alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1303. Cost-of-living adjustments

(a) In the computation of cost-of-living adjustments for fiscal years 1998 through 2013 in the rates of dependency and indemnity compensation payable under this chapter, such adjustments (except as provided in subsection (b)) shall be made by a uniform percentage that is no more than the percentage equal to the social security increase for that fiscal year, with all increased monthly rates (other than increased rates equal to a whole dollar amount) rounded down to the next lower whole dollar amount.

(b) For purposes of this section, the term "social security increase" means the percentage by which benefit amounts payable under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) are increased for any fiscal year as a result of a determination under section 215(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)).

(Added Pub. L. 105–33, title VIII, §8031(b)(1), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 668; amended Pub. L. 107–103, title II, §205, Dec. 27, 2001, 115 Stat. 990; Pub. L. 108–183, title VII, §706, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title II of the Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§401 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–183 substituted "2013" for "2011".

2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–103 substituted "2011" for "2002".
### §124. National Freedom Day

The President may issue each year a proclamation designating February 1 as National Freedom Day to commemorate the signing by Abraham Lincoln on February 1, 1865, of the joint resolution adopted by the Senate and the House of Representatives that proposed the 13th amendment to the Constitution.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1259.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 124 | 36:156. | June 30, 1948, ch. 755, 62 Stat. 1150. |

Section
### SUBCHAPTER III—TUITION REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM
NRC ACCEPTS “BEST PLACE TO WORK” HONORS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a 4,000-strong independent federal safety regulator 

dedicated to protecting people and the environment, has for the third time in succession been named 

the “Best Place to Work” in the federal government by the Partnership for Public Service. 

The selection, in cooperation with the American University Institute for the Study of Public 

Policy Implementation, also marked the first time since the inception of the survey of federal 

employees that any agency has ranked at the top in all four survey categories. The categories are: 

Leadership and Knowledge Management, Results-oriented Performance Culture, Talent 

Management, and Job Satisfaction. 

The NRC, created by Congress in 1974 and headquartered in Rockville, Md., is responsible 

for regulating and overseeing the safety of commercial nuclear reactors and the safe use of 

radioactive materials. It has regional offices outside of Philadelphia, in Atlanta, and near Chicago 

and Dallas. 

“I want to thank the managers and staff of the NRC for making this award possible by their 

dedication to this agency’s important public health and safety mission,” said NRC Chairman 

Gregory B. Jaczko. “We are proud to be a part of the federal family and appreciate the work the 

Office of Personnel Management, the Partnership for Public Service and American University do to 

recognize the efforts and commitment of civil servants across the federal government. 

The Best Places to Work rankings are the most comprehensive and authoritative rating and 

analysis of employee engagement in the federal government. They are compiled by the Partnership 

using data from the Office of Personnel Management’s government-wide Federal Employee 

Viewpoint Survey. The survey measures employees’ perceptions of whether, and to what extent, 

conditions characterizing successful organizations are present in their agencies. This year more than 

260,000 federal employees responded to the survey. 

The NRC also won the honor of “Best Place to Work” in 2007 and 2009 when the survey 

was taken biennially. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-152 September 1, 2010
Computer Trade Mission toUrals, Siberia

----
# L_2017308EN.01002201.xml

| 23.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 119/2016

of 3 June 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/2137]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/314 of 4 March 2016 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/314 of 4 March 2016 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 0314: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/314 of 4 March 2016 (OJ L 60, 5.3.2016, p. 59).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 0314: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/314 of 4 March 2016 (OJ L 60, 5.3.2016, p. 59).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/314 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 June 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 60, 5.3.2016, p. 59.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2017263EN.01003601.xml

| 12.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 263/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 263/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 317/2015

of 11 December 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1828]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/962 of 18 December 2014 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/962 of 18 December 2014 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 17kf (Decision No 585/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘17kg. | 32015 R 0962: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/962 of 18 December 2014 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services (OJ L 157, 23.6.2015, p. 21).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘17kg.

32015 R 0962: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/962 of 18 December 2014 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services (OJ L 157, 23.6.2015, p. 21).’

Article 2

The texts of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/962 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 157, 23.6.2015, p. 21.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 23, 2019)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00100]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 84 , No. 15 / Wednesday, January 23, 2019 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 207]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2019-10 of January 16, 
                2019

                
Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 
                303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 303 of the Defense 
                Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ``Act'') (50 
                U.S.C. 4533), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 
                303(a)(5) of the Act, that the domestic production 
                capability for precursor materials for munitions is 
                essential to the national defense.

                Without Presidential action under section 303 of the 
                Act, United States industry cannot reasonably be 
                expected to provide the production capability for 
                precursor materials for munitions adequately and in a 
                timely manner. Further, purchases, purchase 
                commitments, or other action pursuant to section 303 of 
                the Act are the most cost-effective, expedient, and 
                practical alternative method for meeting the need for 
                this critical capability.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 16, 2019

[FR Doc. 2019-00100
Filed 1-22-19; 8:45 am]
Billing code 5001-06-P
### §40741. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter:

#### (1) DNA arrestee collection process

The term "DNA arrestee collection process" means, with respect to a State, a process under which the State provides for the collection, for purposes of inclusion in the index described in section 12592(a) of this title (in this subchapter referred to as the "National DNA Index System"), of DNA profiles or DNA data from the following individuals who are at least 18 years of age:

(A) Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that consists of a homicide.

(B) Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that has an element involving a sexual act or sexual contact with another and that is punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year.

(C) Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that has an element of kidnaping or abduction and that is punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year.

(D) Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that consists of burglary punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year.

(E) Individuals who are arrested for or charged with a criminal offense under State law that consists of aggravated assault punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year.

#### (2) State

The term "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 112–253, §2, Jan. 10, 2013, 126 Stat. 2407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 112–253, Jan. 10, 2013, 126 Stat. 2407, known as the Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2012, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2013 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14137 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Exhibit 4(g)  



	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY	 	P. O. BOX 10648	 	BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA	 	35202-0648
	





NET AMOUNT AT RISK FEE ENDORSEMENT

FOR

VARIABLE ANNUITY DEATH BENEFIT RIDERS  


We
are adding the following provisions to the Variable Annuity Death Benefit Rider attached to your Contract: 


Benefit Cost—The cost for the death benefit is based on its Net Amount at Risk. Net Amount at Risk is defined as the amount by which the
death benefit exceeds the Contract Value. 


Monthly Fee—Once each month beginning with the 13th month after the Effective Date and continuing as long as the Variable Annuity Death
Benefit Rider is in force, we will calculate the fee for the death benefit and deduct that amount from the Contract Value. The monthly fee is calculated as of the end of the Valuation Period that
includes the same day of the month as the Effective Date, or the last Valuation Period of the month if that date does not occur during the month for which the fee is being calculated. The fee is
deducted from the Contract Value as of the next Valuation Period. 


Calculating the Monthly Fee—We calculate the monthly fee by first dividing the Net Amount at Risk by 1000, and multiplying that number by a
NAR factor that is based on the oldest Owner's Age and gender as shown in the table on the following page. 


Monthly Fee = NAR/1000 x f , where 



NAR = is the Net Amount at Risk as of the calculation date; and
 f = is the Net Amount at Risk factor. 




The
monthly fee will vary as a result of fluctuations in the value of the death benefit and Contract Value, as well as Age based increases in the Net Amount at Risk factor. The monthly fee will be $0
anytime the death benefit equals the Contract Value as of the Valuation Period during which the monthly fee is calculated. 


Deducting the Monthly Fee—We will deduct the monthly fee as of the Valuation Period immediately following the Valuation Period during which
it was calculated. The monthly fee will be deducted pro rata from the Allocation Options in the same proportion that the value of the Allocation Option bears to the total Contract Value. Deduction of
the monthly fee is a partial surrender for the purpose of calculating the death benefit. 


Signed
for the company and made a part of the contract as of the Effective date. 


PROTECTIVE
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 



	


 



Secretary

	
 	

 




1
NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR

PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Northern States Power 

Company to increase the generating capacity of Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Units 1 

and 2 by 1.64 percent.

The NRC staff determined that Northern States Power could safely increase the reactors’

output primarily through more accurate means of measuring feedwater flow. NRC staff also 

reviewed the company’s evaluations showing the plant’s design can handle the increased power 

level.

The NRC safety evaluation of the plant’s proposed power uprate focused on several 

areas, including the nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, 

electrical systems, accident evaluations, radiological consequences, fire protection, operations 

and training, testing, and technical specification changes. 

The power uprate for Prairie Island, located approximately 28 miles southeast of 

Minneapolis, Minn., will increase Unit 1’s generating capacity from approximately 551 to 560

megawatts electric and Unit 2’s generating capacity from approximately 545 to 554 megawatts 

electric. Northern States Power intends to implement the uprate in February 2011.

The NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal 

Register (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-10820.pdf) providing the public an 

opportunity to comment or request a hearing. The agency’s evaluation of the Prairie Island

power uprate will be available through the NRC’s ADAMS electronic document database by 

entering ML102030573 on this Web page: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-145 August 20, 2010
§ 919.310 What must I do if a Federal agency excludes a person with whom I am already doing business in a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue covered transactions with an excluded person if the transactions were in existence when the agency excluded the person. However, you are not required to continue the transactions, and you may consider termination. You should make a decision about whether to terminate and the type of termination action, if any, only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not renew or extend covered transactions (other than no-cost time extensions) with any excluded person, unless the OPM grants an exception under § 919.120.
ABC--KIEV NOW OPEN!

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8053** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of Virginia , at Newport News . Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 4:95

- cr - 00039

- TEM

- TEM

- 1 )

Submitted : February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marty Lor enzo Wright appeals the district court’ s order denying his “Motion for Clarification” in which he s ought to contest the court’s earlier order denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed th e record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wright , No. 4:95

- cr - 00039

- TEM

TEM

- 1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal content ions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
§ 837.403 Termination of annuity during reemployment. ( a ) *Agency action.* When a reemployed disability annuitant is found recovered from disability or restored to earning capacity by OPM, OPM shall terminate the annuity as of the date of the finding, and the employing agency shall cease reducing pay by the amount of annuity allocable to the period of reemployment effective that same date. If the appointment is subject to retirement deductions, retirement deductions will begin or continue, as the case may be.
( b ) *Subsequent benefits* — ( 1 ) *CSRS.* If, on separation from a period of reemployment during which the disability annuity was terminated because of recovery or restoration to earning capacity, the former disability annuitant is entitled to either an immediate or deferred annuity based on the most recent separation, any right to an annuity based on a prior separation is permanently extinguished. If no such right to immediate or deferred annuity accrues based on this most recent separation, however, any right to immediate or deferred annuity will be determined on the basis of the next prior separation.
( 2 ) *FERS.* If a disability annuity is terminated during a period of reemployment because of recovery or restoration to earning capacity, any right to an annuity based on a prior separation is permanently extinguished, except as otherwise provided by § 844.405(b)(2) of this chapter.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PURPOSE; DEFINITIONS; ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS