alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019128EN.01003401.xml

| 16.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 128/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 128/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 138/2017

of 7 July 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/745]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 indicating design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 indicating design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 2 (Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘3. | 32017 R 0306: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 indicating design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment (OJ L 48, 24.2.2017, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘3.

32017 R 0306: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 of 6 February 2017 indicating design, construction and performance requirements and testing standards for marine equipment (OJ L 48, 24.2.2017, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/306 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 48, 24.2.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2022246EN.01008001.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/80

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 131/2022

of 29 April 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1575]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1789 of 8 October 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450 as regards the publication of references of European Assessment Documents for flexible sprinkler hose with end fittings and other construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1789 of 8 October 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450 as regards the publication of references of European Assessment Documents for flexible sprinkler hose with end fittings and other construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1zzp (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/450) of Chapter XXI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32021 D 1789: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1789 of 8 October 2021 (OJ L 359, 11.10.2021, p. 117).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32021 D 1789: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1789 of 8 October 2021 (OJ L 359, 11.10.2021, p. 117).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1789 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 359, 11.10.2021, p. 117.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
# L_2021067EN.01004001.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 147/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2021/209]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/414 of 9 January 2018 supplementing Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the identification of specific items of marine equipment which can benefit from electronic tagging (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/414 of 9 January 2018 supplementing Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the identification of specific items of marine equipment which can benefit from electronic tagging (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 3 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/773) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘4. | 32018 R 0414: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/414 of 9 January 2018 supplementing Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the identification of specific items of marine equipment which can benefit from electronic tagging (OJ L 75, 19.3.2018, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4.

32018 R 0414: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/414 of 9 January 2018 supplementing Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the identification of specific items of marine equipment which can benefit from electronic tagging (OJ L 75, 19.3.2018, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/414 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 75, 19.3.2018, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITIES FOR HEARING ON APPLICATIONS TO RENEW 

OPERATING LICENSES FOR SALEM AND HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced opportunities to request a hearing 

on applications to renew the operating licenses for the Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 

and 2, and the Hope Creek Generating Station. 

 The Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units are pressurized-water nuclear reactors; the 

Hope Creek Generating Station is a boiling-water nuclear reactor. The plants are located in 

Hancock’s Bridge, N.J., about 18 miles southeast of Wilmington, Del.

 The licensee, PSEG Nuclear LLC, submitted the renewal applications on August 18 for 

both plants. The current operating licenses for Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2 

expire on Aug. 13, 2016, and April 18, 2020, respectively. The Hope Creek license expires on 

April 11, 2026. 

 

 The NRC staff has determined that the applications contain sufficient information for the 

agency to formally "docket," or file, both applications and begin their technical review. 

Docketing of the applications does not preclude requesting additional information as the review 

proceeds; nor does it indicate whether the Commission will grant the applications. 

 The deadline for requesting a hearing is Dec. 22, following today’s publication of notices 

in the Federal Register. By that date, petitions must be filed by anyone whose interest may be 

affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. 

 A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary 

of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, 

Attention: Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. They may also be submitted by facsimile to 

(301) 415-1101 or email to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov. A copy should also be submitted to 

the NRC Office of General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to 

OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov. 

 Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC Web site at 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-178 October 23, 2009
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. The Salem renewal application is 

online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/salem.html and 

the Hope Creek renewal application is online at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/hope-creek.html . 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC ACCEPTS TOSHIBA APPLICATION TO RENEW CERTIFICATION 

FOR ADVANCED BOILING WATER REACTOR DESIGN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has accepted for review an application requesting a 

15-year renewal of the design certification for the Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR). 

 The NRC certified the ABWR in 1997 as being acceptable for use in the United States. A 

design certification is valid for 15 years and can be renewed for an additional 10 to 15 years. 

Toshiba Corporation submitted the renewal application on Nov. 2. The application is available 

on the NRC website at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/design-cert/renewal-abwr.html. 

Docketing the ABWR renewal application does not indicate whether the Commission 

will approve or reject the request. The NRC has established docket number 52-044 for this 

application. More information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC 

website at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

 For further information, contact project manager David Misenhimer in the Office of New 

Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T6D38, Washington, D.C. 20555; 

David.Misenhimer@nrc.gov or by telephone at (301) 415-6590. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-223 December 22, 2010
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company JUL 1 6 2004

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status ofthe Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company (MCR) (B.A.

No. 4335) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et

seep) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et

seep) (RUIA). MCR has been an employer under the RRA and RUIA with sendee

creditable from April 1, 1885.

Mr. William Kuhn, Controller, MCR, reported that MCR ceased its operations on

July 31, 2002 and last compensated its employees on December 31, 2002.

Pursuant to an agreement effective July 31, 2002, MCR was sold to LTV Steel

Company and ALMONO LP. ALMONO LP purchased all land, track structures 

and buildings owned by MCR. Various equipment and rolling stock were sold to

various parties prior to the sale. According to Mr. Kuhn, MCR is now an empty 

corporate structure waiting to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation.

Section 202.11 ofthe Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate 

whenever such company or person loses any ofthe characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status.

Based on the information set forth above, it is the determination ofthe Railroad 

Retirement Board that Monongahela Connecting Railroad Company ceased being

an employer under the RRA and RUIA on December 31, 2002, the date on which it

last compensated its employees.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA # 4335
§ 630.912 Prohibition of coercion. ( a ) An employee may not directly or indirectly intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other employee for the purpose of interfering with any right such employee may have with respect to donating, receiving, or using annual leave under this subpart.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a) of this section, the term “intimidate, threaten, or coerce” includes promising to confer or conferring any benefit (such as an appointment or promotion or compensation) or effecting or threatening to effect any reprisal (such as deprivation of appointment, promotion, or compensation).
### §21305. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1295.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21305 | 36:20 (3d sentence words before 2d comma). | Jan. 4, 1889, ch. 20, (3d sentence words before 2d comma), 25 Stat. 640. |

Section
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert McIntosh,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Robert McIntosh
Robert McIntosh
President, CEO and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


May 6, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TRUMAN SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-98-79-F, CA-01-212-7-F) Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Truman Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50729

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Trinidad Walter Encarnacion-Pascual, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-142-1

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Trinidad Walter Encarnacion-Pascual appeals his conviction and 

sentence for illegal reentry after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) 

and (b)(2). He contends that the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 

§ 1326(b) was unconstitutional because the fact of his prior conviction, which 

increased his statutory maximum, was treated as a sentencing factor, rather 

than as an element of the offense. He has filed an unopposed motion for 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 20, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50729 Document: 00516618482 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/20/2023
No. 22-50729

2

summary disposition and a letter brief explaining that he has raised this issue 

only to preserve it for further review and conceding correctly that this issue 

is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See 

United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). Because 

summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 

F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Encarnacion-Pascual’s motion is 

GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-50729 Document: 00516618482 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/20/2023
### §220104. Governing body

(a) Board of Governors.—(1) The board of governors is the governing body of the corporation. The board is responsible for the general policies and program of the corporation and for the control of the affairs and property of the corporation.

(2) The board shall be elected by the members of the corporation for the term and in the classes provided in the bylaws of the corporation. The board includes—

(A) six members appointed by the President;

(B) the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary's designee; and

(C) representatives of the civilian organizations listed in section 220102(4) of this title, and of the public at large, as provided in the bylaws.

(3) The corporation may have other governing bodies or committees as provided in the bylaws.

(b) Officers.—(1) The office of honorary chairman of the corporation shall be offered to the President. On acceptance, the honorary chairman shall be invited to preside at meetings of the corporation that the honorary chairman deems appropriate and convenient.

(2) The corporation may have other officers as provided in the bylaws.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1460; Pub. L. 109–284, §5(11), Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1212.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 220104(a) | 36:1305(b), (c). | Dec. 29, 1979, Pub. L. 96–165, §5(b)–(d), 93 Stat. 1270. |
| 220104(b) | 36:1305(d). | |

Section

In subsection (a)(1), the words "The board of governors is the governing body of the corporation" are substituted for "The management of the corporation shall be entrusted to a board of governors" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (a)(2), the text of 36:1305(b) (2d sentence) and the word "Thereafter" are omitted as executed and obsolete.

In subsection (b)(1), the word "offered" is substituted for "tendered" to use a more common word.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a)(2)(B). Pub. L. 109–284 substituted "Defense" for "State".
### [§411l. Renumbered §481l]