alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. II-10-063 September 16, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES MEETINGS IN PIKETON TO DISCUSS PORTSMOUTH 

GASEOUS DIFFUSION PLANT AND LEAD CASCADE FACILITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two public meetings at Piketon, 

Ohio, on Sept. 23 to discuss results of the agency’s most recent reviews of the United States 

Enrichment Corporation’s Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant and the USEC Inc.’s American 

Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility located at the same site. USEC Inc. is the parent company of 

the United States Enrichment Corporation. 

The first meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (EDT) at the Ohio State University South Centers 

Auditorium, 1864 Shyville Road in Piketon. The NRC staff will discuss with company officials 

the results of the agency’s review of safety performance at the plant from July 6, 2008, to July 

10, 2010. The discussion will include performance in the areas of safety operations, safeguards, 

radiological controls, facility support and special topics. 

In its review, the NRC found no areas needing improvement, but did note that the 

agency’s inspection program for the facility will likely be revised because the company plans to 

turn several facilities at the site over to the Department of Energy this fall. 

The NRC will also conduct a second public meeting at about 7:30 p.m., or immediately 

following the first meeting, to discuss the NRC review of the American Centrifuge Lead Cascade 

facility at the Portsmouth plant site. That review will cover the same areas as those discussed in 

the first meeting. The NRC found no areas needing improvement at the lead cascade facility. 

The agency will continue the current level of inspections based on the performance and the 

limited amount of material currently at the site. 

Both meetings will be open to the public and NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions after the business portion of each meeting. 

A copy of the Licensee Performance Review for the gaseous diffusion plant is publicly 

available online at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. The number to access the 

document is ML102370403. The document number for the lead cascade LPR is ML102370410. 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
§ 842.210 Military reserve technicians. ( a ) A military reserve technician as defined in 5 U.S.C. 8401(30) who is separated from civilian service because of ceasing to qualify as a member of a military reserve component after reaching age 50 and completing 25 years of service is entitled to an annuity.
( b ) An annuity payable under paragraph (a) of this section commences on the day after separation.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-161 November 28, 2005

NRC RENEWS MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION

OPERATING LICENSES FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Millstone

Power Station, Units 2 and 3, for an additional 20 years. 

The Millstone plant is located about 3 miles southwest of New London, Conn. The licensee,

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc., submitted its license renewal applications on Jan. 20, 2004. With

the renewal, the license for Unit 2 is extended to July 31, 2035, and the license for Unit 3 is extended

to Nov. 25, 2045.

The NRC’s environmental review for this license renewal is described in a site-specific

supplement to the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear

Power Plants” (NUREG-1437, Supplement 22), issued in July. The review concluded there were no

environmental impacts that would preclude renewal of the licenses for environmental reasons. A public

meeting to discuss the environmental review was held near the plant on Jan. 11.

After carefully reviewing the plant’s safety systems and specifications, the staff concluded that

there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had

demonstrated the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. The “Safety Evaluation Report

Related to the License Renewal of the Millstone Power Station, Units 2 and 3” (NUREG-1838), was

published in October. In addition, NRC conducted inspections of the plants to verify information

submitted by the licensee. The reports relating to the Millstone renewal are available on the NRC Web

site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/millstone.html .

On Sept. 22, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards – an independent body of

technical experts which advises the Commission – issued its recommendation that the operating license

for Millstone be renewed. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the Safety Aspects of the

License Renewal Applications for the Millstone Power Station, Units 2 and 3.” This document is

available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2005/ .
The Millstone renewals bring the total number of renewals to 37 reactor units. A complete

listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html .

###
### §3535. Approval of courses

An eligible person shall receive the benefits of this chapter while enrolled in a course of education offered by an educational institution only if such course (1) is approved in accordance with the provisions of subchapter I 1 of chapter 36 of this title, or (2) is approved for the enrollment of the particular individual under the provisions of section 3536 of this title.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1199, §1735; Pub. L. 88–126, §2, Sept. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 162; Pub. L. 89–358, §4(n), Mar. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 25; Pub. L. 92–540, title IV, §402(4), Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1090; renumbered §3535 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapter I of chapter 36 of this title, referred to in text, was redesignated subchapter II (§3670 et seq.) of chapter 36 of this title by Pub. L. 117–333, §2(a)(1), Jan. 5, 2023, 136 Stat. 6122.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1735 of this title as this section and substituted "3536" for "1736".

1972—Pub. L. 92–540 substituted reference to section 1736 of this title for reference to section 1737 of this title.

1966—Pub. L. 89–358 redesignated former subsec. (a) as the entire section, struck out therefrom the introductory phrase "Until the date for the expiration of all education and training under chapter 33 of this title,", substituted "An eligible person" for "and eligible person", "chapter" for "subchapter", and "subchapter I of chapter 36 of this title" for "this section or subchapter VII of this chapter", and struck out former subsec. (b) which provided for scope of approval and is now incorporated in section 1770(b) of this title.

1963—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 88–126, §2(1), (2), inserted "Until the date for the expiration of all education and training under chapter 33 of this title, and" before "eligible person", and "or subchapter VII of this chapter" after "this section".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 88–126, §2(3), inserted "or section 1778."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 88–126, §2(4), repealed subsec. (c) which related to the responsibility of the Administrator, after the expiration date of all education and training under chapter 33 of this title, for the approval of any additional courses.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 838.124 Employees' and retirees' responsibilities. Employees and retirees are responsible for— ( a ) Raising any objections to the validity of a court order in the appropriate State court; and
( b ) Submitting all disputes with former spouses to the appropriate State court for resolution.
No: II-08-042 August 14, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $16,250 FINE AGAINST GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUELS 

FOR VIOLATIONS AT WILMINGTON NUCLEAR FUEL PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $16,250 civil penalty against 

Global Nuclear Fuel – Americas, L.L.C., for incorrectly categorizing an emergency level 

declaration during a Jan. 30 incident at the plant’s low-enriched uranium processing line in 

Wilmington, N.C. 

 NRC officials said violations occurred when moisture was introduced into a Dry 

Conversion Process cooling hopper containing uranium dioxide powder which was initially 

believed to be above safe critical mass limits. A criticality event is an unanticipated nuclear 

reaction resulting in an undesired release of radiation. 

 No actual consequences resulted from the event, and it did not result in a criticality 

accident. Company representatives later told the NRC at a pre-decisional enforcement 

conference that the system was undergoing maintenance testing and that the company later 

determined that a criticality event was not possible because one of two moisture control 

interlocks remained operational during the test, preventing excess moisture from entering the 

cooling hopper. The company said it was determined that the hopper contained a safe amount of 

uranium dioxide, moisture in the powder was within normal limits, and that long-term corrective 

action had been taken to prevent recurrence. 

 NRC officials said in this case corrective actions were prompt and comprehensive and 

that no civil penalty was being proposed. 

 However, the NRC said another violation caused the agency to propose the fine. It was 

associated with declaration by the company of an incorrect emergency action level. Company 

representatives told the NRC that an Alert was declared based on information available at the 

time of the event. However, the company initially declared the event as an “Off-Normal 

Condition” and upgraded it to an Alert 11 minutes later without obtaining any new information. 

The NRC staff said the company failed to follow its own procedure that would have initially 

categorized the event as an Alert, based on information at the time of the event that indicated a 

potential for a criticality existed. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
-2- 

 The company has 30 days in which to either pay the civil penalty or to protest its 

imposition, in whole or in part. 

 A copy of the NRC letter, its enclosures and the company’s response will be made 

available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public document Room in Washington, 

D.C., and from the NRC document system (ADAMS) accessible from the NRC web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. NRC also includes significant enforcement actions 

on its web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions/. 

###
Exhibit 34.2

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Card Services Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” that HSBC Card Services Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), and 1122(d)(4)(xiv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Applicable Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions secured by credit card receivables that are identified in management’s “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31,2008. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 30, 2009
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00327

- CV

Maxine ADAMS and Cecil Adams

,

Appellants

v.
Christopher PRINE

, Appellee

From the 269th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 35653

- a Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In civil cases, rule 34.5(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure requires the clerk’s record to include “all pleadings on which the trial was held.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(a)(1). The final judgment signed in the above

- referenced case states the trial court considered “Prine’s Motion to Enter Final Judgment;” therefore, that motion is one of the “pleadings on which the trial was held.” Id. However, the motion was not included in the clerk’s record filed in this

a ppeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court clerk file a supplemental clerk’s record containing “Prine’s Motion to Enter Final Judgment” no later than ten days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of December, 20 16

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.6
                                                                    ------------

                        Consent of Independent Engineers

The Board of Directors of
Pure Resources, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-48346, 333-37868 and 333-37870), the
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 Registration Statement
(No. 333-34970) and the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-34970) of
Pure Resources, Inc., of references to our decommissioning estimates included or
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

TWATCHMAN SNYDER & BYRD, INC.


/s/ Robert C. Byrd
------------------------------------
Twatchman Snyder & Byrd, Inc.
Robert C. Byrd
Vice President

March 8, 2002
Exhibit 32.1






STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.


OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Luigi
Rispoli, President, and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:




(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 17, 2009






/s/ Luigi Rispoli


Luigi Rispoli


President and CEO & CFO
**Exhibit32.2**

**Certification of Chief FinancialOfficer**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedofficer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)                                     theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Sign:                   | /S/   Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Geoffrey M. Boyd        |                                  |   |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |                                  |   |   |   |
| March 12, 2007          |                                  |   |   |   |
|                         |                                       |        |  |  |  |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; Development—2 Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 4-5, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rass M. Shayiq, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2182, MSC 7818, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-2359,                         *shayiqr@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2019.

Sylvia L. Neal, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00167 Filed 1-25-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 847.908 If a retiree who elected to credit NAFI service under subpart H of this part earns a supplemental annuity under 5 CFR part 837, how will that supplemental annuity be computed?

This subpart does not affect supplemental annuities under 5 CFR part 837. Supplemental annuities will be computed in accordance with the provisions of that part.
Exhibit 13.1




Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Global Sources Ltd. (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.




Dated: June 25, 2010




/s/  Merle A. Hinrichs

Merle A. Hinrichs

Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 20-F to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GLOBAL SOURCES LTD. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY GLOBAL SOURCES. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.