alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 10.11

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC.
                      CORPORATE OFFICER STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


Pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Champion Enterprises, Inc. Corporate Officer
Stock Purchase Plan ("Plan"), and in accordance with authority granted by the
Deferred Compensation Committee, Champion Enterprises, Inc. hereby adopts this
Amendment to the Plan.

        1. Section 9.2 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as
           follows:

           9.2 Rabbi Trust. To the extent that any person acquires a right to
        receive payments from the Employer hereunder, such rights shall be no
        greater than the right of an unsecured creditor of the Employer. The
        Company will, however, establish a grantor type trust, commonly known as
        a Rabbi Trust, as a vehicle for accumulating the assets needed to pay
        the promised benefit. The trustee shall invest the assets of the trust
        exclusively in Champion Enterprises, Inc. Common Stock, except to the
        extent of fractional shares, which shall be held in cash.
        Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon the written instruction of a
        Participant, the trustee shall, as promptly as is administratively
        feasible, sell the number of shares of said stock from the Participant's
        Vested Account Balance as the Participant directs, and shall invest the
        sales proceeds in liquid fixed income obligations or diversified stock
        mutual funds as may be approved from time to time by the Deferred
        Compensation Committee. The Participant subsequently may direct the
        trustee, in writing, to reinvest the sales proceeds and any accumulated
        earnings in Champion Enterprises, Inc. Common Stock, which the trustee
        shall do as promptly as is administratively feasible. Provided, however,
        that a Participant may not make a purchase or sale direction more
        frequently than once every twelve months, and the timing of any purchase
        or sale transaction shall be subject to all applicable restrictions of
        the Federal securities laws.

        2. This Amendment is effective August 1, 2002.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Champion Enterprises, Inc. has caused this Amendment
to be executed as of ____________________________, 2002.

                                                     CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC.


                                                     By: _______________________
Its: _________________________


                                                     ATTEST:

                                                     ___________________________
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE CLERK WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001 April 1,2015

Clerk 

### Court ofCriminal Appeals ofTexas ftpfen 

# P.O.Box 12308 C0^T0f^DIM Capitol Station ^'"AlARp^^ 

# Austin,TX78711 APR Qq^fljc
RE: Charles R. Ray v. Texas

- 

# TXCoCRAWE-49,997-05 ^COsHQ@rk No: 14-9113
Dear Clerk: 

### The above-entitled petition for a writ ofcertiorari was originally postmarked December 8,2014 and received again on March 31,2015. The papers are returned for the following reason(s): 

### The petition is out-of-time. The date ofthe lower courtjudgment or order denying a 

### timely petition for rehearing was August 20, 2014. Therefore, the petition was due on or before November 18, 2014. Rules 13.1, 29.2 and 30.1. When the time to file a petition for a writ ofcertiorari in a civil case (habeas action included) has expired, the Court no 

### longer has the power to review the petition. The order dated September 16, 2014 does not appear to be the denial ofa timely filed 

### petition for reconsideration/rehearing. The petition in case #14-9113 has been removed from the docket.

Enclosures Sincerely, Scott S. Harris, Clerk By:
Andrew Downs (202) 479-3038
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Sullivan, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 677-678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Final 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Land-Water Interface 
and Service Pier Extension at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor, Kitsap County, 
WA

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Department of the Navy (Navy), announces its 
decision to construct and operate a Service Pier Extension (SPE) and 
associated support facilities in Hood Canal on the waterfront of Naval 
Base (NAVBASE) Kitsap Bangor, Washington (WA). The Navy will implement 
Alternative 2, short pier configuration, which is the preferred 
alternative in the October 2018 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement (SEIS) for the Land-Water Interface (LWI) and SPE, NAVBASE 
Kitsap Bangor, WA. The Alternative 2 short pier configuration is also 
the environmentally preferred alternative and will fully meet the 
Navy's purpose and need for the proposed action.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The existing Service Pier will be extended 
by 520 feet and will require in-water as well as upland construction of

[[Page 678]]

associated facilities to provide additional maintenance berthing 
capacity and improve associated support facilities for existing 
homeported and visiting submarines at NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor. The 
complete text of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the LWI and SPE SEIS 
is available on the project website at http://www.nbkeis.com/SEIS.aspx, 
along with the October 2018 Final SEIS for LWI and SPE, NAVBASE Kitsap 
Bangor, WA. Single copies of the ROD are available upon request by 
contacting: Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest, Attn: Ms. 
Kimberly Kler (LWI and SPE SEIS Program Manager), 1101 Tautog Circle, 
Silverdale, WA 98315-1101.

    Dated: January 28, 2019.
M.S. Werner,
Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-00372 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
# L_2021067EN.01003901.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 146/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2021/208]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2017/2054 of 8 November 2017 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2017/2054 of 8 November 2017 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 3q (Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 L 2054: Commission Directive (EU) 2017/2054 of 8 November 2017 (OJ L 311, 25.11.2017, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 L 2054: Commission Directive (EU) 2017/2054 of 8 November 2017 (OJ L 311, 25.11.2017, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2017/2054 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 311, 25.11.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §3763. Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program Account

(a) There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States an account known as the "Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program Account" (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Account").

(b) The Account shall be available to the Secretary to carry out all operations relating to the making of direct housing loans to Native American veterans under this subchapter, including any administrative expenses relating to the making of such loans. Amounts in the Account shall be available without fiscal year limitation.

(Added Pub. L. 102–547, §8(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3639; amended Pub. L. 105–368, title VI, §602(e)(3)(B), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3347; Pub. L. 107–14, §8(a)(16), June 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 35.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–14 substituted "hereinafter" for "hereafter".

1998—Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "Native American Veteran Housing Loan Program Account" for "Housing loan program account" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–368 effective Oct. 1, 1998, see section 602(f) of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as a note under section 2106 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart B to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.204 Definitions.

In this subpart:

*Band* means a work level or pay range within an occupational cluster.

*Basic pay* means an employee's rate of pay before any deductions and exclusive of additional pay of any kind, except as expressly provided by law or regulation. For the specific purposes prescribed in §§ 9701.332(c) and 9701.333, respectively, basic pay includes locality and special rate supplements.

*Classification,* also referred to as job evaluation, means the process of analyzing and assigning a job or position to an occupational series, cluster, and band for pay and other related purposes.

*Competencies* means the measurable or observable knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics required by a position.

*Occupational cluster* means a grouping of one or more associated or related occupations or positions. An occupational cluster may include one or more occupational series.

*Occupational series* means the number OPM or DHS assigns to a group or family of similar positions for identification purposes (for example: 0110, Economist Series; 1410, Librarian Series).

*Position* or *Job* means the duties, responsibilities, and related competency requirements that are assigned to an employee whom the Secretary or designee approves for coverage under § 9701.202(a).
# L_2019307EN.01000101.xml

| 28.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 307/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 307/1

---

Information on the date of signature and provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2019

The European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania signed on 13 November 2019, in Brussels, the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2019.

The Agreement accordingly applies provisionally from 16 November 2019 pursuant to point 6 thereof.

---
### §1958. Statutory total permanent disability

Without prejudice to any other cause of disability, the permanent loss of the use of both feet, of both hands, or of both eyes, or of one foot and one hand, or of one foot and one eye, or of one hand and one eye, or the loss of hearing of both ears, or the organic loss of speech, shall be deemed total permanent disability for insurance purposes. This section shall be deemed to be in effect on and after April 6, 1917, and shall apply only to automatic insurance, yearly renewable term insurance, and United States Government life insurance issued prior to December 15, 1936.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1163, §758; renumbered §1958, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 758 of this title as this section.
#### § 930.202 Definitions.

In this subpart:

*Administrative law judge position* means a position in which any portion of the duties requires the appointment of an administrative law judge under 5 U.S.C. 3105.

*Agency* has the same meaning given in 5 U.S.C. 551(1).

*Detail* means the temporary assignment of an administrative law judge from one administrative law judge position to another administrative law judge position without change in civil service or pay status.

*Removal* means discharge of an administrative law judge from the position of an administrative law judge or involuntary reassignment, demotion, or promotion to a position other than that of an administrative law judge.

*Senior administrative law judge* means a retired administrative law judge who is reemployed under a temporary appointment under 5 U.S.C. 3323(b)(2) and § 930.209 of this chapter.

*Superior qualifications* means an appointment made at a rate above the minimum rate based on such qualifications as experience practicing law before the hiring agency; experience practicing before another forum in a field of law relevant to the hiring agency; or an outstanding reputation among others in a field of law relevant to the hiring agency.
```

[House Report 107-332]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-332

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
       2883, INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002

                                _______
                                

 December 11, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 312]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 312, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2883, the Intelligence 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002, and against its 
consideration.

                                

```
§ 845.208 Referral to a collection agency. ( a ) OPM retains the responsibility for resolving disputes, compromising claims, referring the debt for litigation, or suspending or terminating collection action.
( b ) OPM may refer certain debts to commercial collection agencies under the following conditions: ( 1 ) All processing required by § 845.204 has been completed before the debt is released; and
( 2 ) A contract for collection services has been negotiated.
§ 838.111 Exemption from legal process except as authorized by Federal law. ( a ) Employees, retirees, and State courts may not assign CSRS and FERS benefits except as provided in this part.
( b ) CSRS and FERS benefits are not subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment or other legal process except as expressly provided by Federal law.
#### Peter Casella, Respondent, v. Maurice Simmons, as Property Clerk of the Police Department of the City of New York, Appellant.

Present—Townley, Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGG EBELING,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

GREGORY SMITH; NEVADA

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 12-16350

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00356-RCJWGC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2014** 

San Francisco, California

Before: BEA, IKUTA, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregg Ebeling appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). The Nevada Supreme Court’s denial of

Ebeling’s claim that his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated by

FILED

SEP 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the trial court’s limitations on the cross-examination of the child witnesses, and by

the exclusion of expert testimony regarding the child witnesses, was not contrary to

or an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent. Cf.

Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400, 411 (1988); Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S.

284, 302–03 (1973). The trial court did not prohibit Ebeling “from engaging in

otherwise appropriate cross-examination,” see Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S.

673, 679–80 (1986), and there is no Supreme Court case addressing the exclusion

of expert testimony, Moses v. Payne, 555 F.3d 742, 757–59 (9th Cir. 2008). 

Although Ebeling failed to exhaust his due process claim based on prosecutorial

misconduct, we deny it on the merits, 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2), because the

prosecutor’s comments did not make the trial fundamentally unfair. See Donnelly

v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 (1974). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2004,  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
McIntosh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Robert McIntosh
Robert McIntosh
President, CEO and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


November 3, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.337 Treatment of employees whose rate of pay falls below the minimum adjusted rate of their band. ( a ) In the case of an employee who does not receive a pay increase under § 9701.335 because of an unacceptable rating of record and whose rate of basic pay (including a locality or special rate supplement) falls below the minimum adjusted rate of his or her band as a result of that rating, DHS must— ( 1 ) If the employee demonstrates performance that meets or exceeds performance expectations within 90 days after the date of the locality or special rate supplement adjustment, issue a new rating of record under § 9701.409(b) and adjust the employee's pay prospectively by making the increase effective on the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after the date the new rating of record is issued; or
( 2 ) Initiate action within 90 days after the date of the locality or special rate supplement adjustment to demote or remove the employee in accordance with the adverse action procedures established in subpart F of this part.
( b ) If DHS fails to initiate a removal or demotion action under paragraph (a)(2) of this section within 90 days after the date of a locality or special rate supplement adjustment, the employee becomes entitled to the minimum adjusted rate of his or her band rate range on the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after the 90th day following the date of the locality or special rate supplement adjustment.