alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Argued and submitted October 31,

affirmed December 13, 2000

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*JOHN SAMUEL THIEMEYER III, *Appellant.*

(9812-20207; CA A106396)

15 P3d 995

Meredith Allen, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was David E. Groom, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim and Brewer, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Hutchinson,*170 Or App 154, 11 P3d 269 (2000).
#### In re Estate of Catherine Welch, deceased. On Appeal of John H. O’Brien, Appellant, v. Margaret Welch, Appellee.

Gen. No. 19,315.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. Sterling Pomeroy, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Proceeding by Margaret Welch, administratrix of the estate of Catherine Welch, deceased, against John H. 0 ’Brien by citation in the Probate Court under section 81 of the act relating to “Administration of Estates,” J. & A. ¶ 130. The Probate Court entered an order directing defendant to pay a certain sum found in his possession to the administratrix. On defendant’s appeal to the Circuit Court a like order was entered. *201From the order of the Circuit Court, defendant appeals.

Francis A. McDonnell, for appellant.

George E. Brannan, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Executors and administrators, § *95*
      ***
      *—when objections to affidavit waived.*Objection to the sufficiency of an affidavit filed by an administratrix in pursuance of section 81 of the statute relating to “Administration of Estates,” J. & A. ¶ 130, is waived by the party appearing and going to trial.

2. Executors and administrators, § *94*
      ***
      *—necessary parties in proceeding by citation.*It is not necessary to make the beneficiaries of an estate parties to a proceeding by citation under section 81 of the statute relating to the “Administration of Estates,” J. *&*A. 1f 130.

3. Gifts, § *29*
      ***
      *—when evidence insufficient to establish gift inter vivos in trust.*In a proceeding by citation under section 81 of the statute relating to “Administration of Estates,” where the person cited claimed that certain property was given him by the intestate to hold in trust for the benefit of certain persons, *held*that the evidence was insufficient to establish a gift *inter vivos*in trust, it appearing that defendant was the intestate’s agent with -reference to the sale of certain real estate and collected the money therefrom which he retained, of which the fund in question was a part, and that the money was considered as belonging to the intestate to he disposed of in whatever manner she saw fit during her lifetime, without any intention of parting with its control

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §10262. State and local governments to consider courts

The Attorney General may require, as appropriate, that whenever a State or unit of local government or Indian tribe applies for a grant from the Department of Justice, the State, unit, or tribe demonstrate that, in developing the application and distributing funds, the State, unit, or tribe—

(1) considered the needs of the judicial branch of the State, unit, or tribe, as the case may be;

(2) consulted with the chief judicial officer of the highest court of the State, unit, or tribe, as the case may be; and

(3) consulted with the chief law enforcement officer of the law enforcement agency responsible for the security needs of the judicial branch of the State, unit, or tribe, as the case may be.

(Pub. L. 110–177, title III, §302(c), Jan. 7, 2008, 121 Stat. 2539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007, and not as part of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 3702 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.33    
    


 
  FIFTH AMENDMENT TO
  THE ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS 401(K) AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
  (amended and restated as of January 1, 2001)    



        ADS
Alliance Data Systems, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 5 to the Alliance Data Systems 401(k) and Retirement Savings Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of
September 12, 2003, except as otherwise provided. 



	1.
	Section 1.67
shall be amended by adding new subsection (E) at the end thereof to read as follows:



	(E)
	Notwithstanding
the foregoing, former employees of Specialty Retailers (TX) LP, a subsidiary of Stage Stores, Inc ("Specialty), who became employees of the Company as of
September 12, 2003, as the result of an asset purchase shall have their service to Specialty, as determined from its payroll records ("Specialty Service"), credited to them for purpose of
determining their eligibility to participate in the Plan, provided, however, that no such former employee shall be, or ever become, eligible to receive a Retirement Contribution.






	2.
	Section 1.68
of the Plan shall be amended by adding new subsection (G) at the end thereof to read as follows:



	(G)
	Notwithstanding
the foregoing, former employees of Specialty, who became employees of the Company as of September 12, 2003, as the result of an asset purchase shall have their
Specialty Service credited to them for purpose of determining their Years of Vesting Service.






	3.
	Appendix A
shall be amended by adding the following new language at the end thereof: 







	Employing Company
 
	 	Years of Eligibility
	 	Years of Vesting

	Specialty	 	Date of hire by Specialty,

but only if employed by

the Company as of 9/12/2003.	 	Date of hire by Specialty,

but only if employed by

the Company as of 9/12/2003.






        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed on this 25th day of September, 2003, but effective as provided above. 



	 	 	ADS ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  DWAYNE H. TUCKER      












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.33


FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS 401(K) AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN (amended and restated as of January 1, 2001)
Exhibit 13.2

906 Certification

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In connection with the periodic report of NetEase.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Denny Lee, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: June 26, 2007



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Denny Lee          
|Name:  |  | Denny Lee              
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. III-09-032 

Contacts: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663 

 November 17, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Web site: www.nrc.gov

NRC STAFF ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO ENTERGY 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Confirmatory Order to Entergy 

Nuclear Operations Inc., operator of the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, to confirm the actions to 

be taken to address the violation of NRC requirements. Palisades failed to provide the NRC with 

complete and accurate security information. The plant is located in Covert, Mich., five miles 

south of South Haven. 

 The NRC identified the violation during an inspection and an investigation conducted in 

2008 at the plant. Although the details of the violation are being withheld because they contain 

security related information, the problems associated with it have been resolved. 

 Entergy has agreed to the terms and conditions of the Confirmatory Order that requires it 

take a number of actions nuclear fleet wide such as: (1) develop and implement a process that 

ensures safeguards and security related information is processed appropriately through the 

corrective action program; (2) provide training to employees on the importance of providing 

complete and accurate information to the NRC and; (3) provide a lessons-learned presentation to 

utility groups that will address the events that led to the Confirmatory Order and the corrective 

actions taken. 

 The Confirmatory Order documents the commitments to the NRC, reached as a result of 

the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) process. The ADR process uses a neutral mediator 

with no decision-making authority to assist the NRC and its license holders in resolving 

differences regarding enforcement actions. Often, the ADR process is more effective than 

traditional enforcement in developing broad, long-term corrective actions, thus producing a 

greater benefit for public safety than a one-time fine or other enforcement action. 

 The NRC will not take any other enforcement actions against Entergy for these issues. 

However, the NRC staff will evaluate the commitments during future inspections. Copies of the 

Confirmatory Order issued will be available on the NRC Web Site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

# # # 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-051 April 19, 2007

 NRC RANKED BEST PLACE TO WORK IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission captured the top ranking among large federal agencies in

the 2007 Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings announced today by the Partnership

for Public Service and the American University Institute for the Study of Public Policy

Implementation. 

The NRC, along with others, was recognized in a ceremony today in Washington, D.C., where

NRC Chairman Dale E. Klein said, "This is a very great honor for all the men and women at the NRC

who are committed to our mission to protecting people and the environment. The remarkable

dedication and camaraderie at our agency make it a great place to work, and we will work hard to keep

it that way.” 

The NRC is recruiting about 400 employees each year for the next few years because of the

expected arrival of close to two dozen applications for new reactor licenses beginning this fall. This

ranking, along with new recruiting authority provided by Congress, should assist in the agency’s hiring

efforts to maintain an innovative and effective workforce.

Rankings are compiled by the Partnership using data from the Office of Management and

Budget’s 2006 Federal Human Capital Survey. This year, a record 221,000 employees at 283 federal

organizations responded. The survey data is analyzed by the Partnership to develop detailed rankings

of federal agencies. Agencies are ranked according to employee satisfaction and engagement, plus by

10 workplace categories including effective leadership, strategic management, teamwork, and training

and development, plus pay/benefits and work/life balance.

As a result of NRC employee responses to the survey, the NRC ranked number one in eight of

10 categories and scored well above the government-wide average. It ranked consistently higher in

three key categories of effective leadership, employee skills/mission match and work/life balance. The

NRC also ranked first among all age groups and for black and white employees. 

Details of the survey can be found at: http://www.bestplacestowork.org.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 
http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
# L_2022175EN.01004201.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/42

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 25/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1073]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1589 of 22 July 2020 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the data on new heavy-duty vehicles to be monitored and reported by Member States and by manufacturers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1589 of 22 July 2020 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the data on new heavy-duty vehicles to be monitored and reported by Member States and by manufacturers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21azk (Regulation (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32020 R 1589: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1589 of 22 July 2020 (OJ L 360, 30.10.2020, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32020 R 1589: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1589 of 22 July 2020 (OJ L 360, 30.10.2020, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1589 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 396/2021 of 10 December 2021 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 360, 30.10.2020, p. 4.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

2

---
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0066 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs - Fiscal Year 2006

Accession Number: ML070730498

Date Released: Friday, April 20, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030560328 - SRM-SECY-02-0216 - Proposed Process for Providing Information on Significant Nuclear Materials Issues & Adverse Licensee Performance. (1 page(s), 2/25/2003)
    - ML070730515 - SECY-07-0066 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs - Fiscal Year 2006 (67 page(s), 4/4/2007)
    - ML070730558 - SECY-07-0066 Enclosure 1- Annual Trend in AO Events from FY 1999 - 2006 (1 page(s), 4/4/2007)
    - ML070730580 - SECY-07-0066 Enclosure 2 - Summary of Level I and II Enforcement Actions for FYs 2002 - 2006 (6 page(s), 4/4/2007)
    - ML070670153 - INL/EXT-06-01325, "Nuclear Material Events Database Quarterly Report - Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2006." (71 page(s), 1/31/2007)
    - ML070730596 - SECY-07-0066 Enclosure 4 - Review of Breakdown of Agreement State and NRC Event Data (2 page(s), 4/4/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §70701. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Frederick Douglass Memorial and Historical Association (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a body corporate and politic in the District of Columbia.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1354.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70701 | 36:4401 (words before "for the following objects and purposes"). | June 6, 1900, ch. 806, §§1 (words before "for the following objects and purposes"), 3, 31 Stat. 662, 663. |
| | 36:4403. | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words. The text of 36:4403 is omitted as executed and obsolete.
§ 630.506 Minimum unit. ( a ) When an employee moves between positions under subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, in different agencies, only his leave in whole hour units may be transferred.
( b ) When an employee moves between positions under subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, covered by different leave charging systems within the same agency, his leave is transferable in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, unless the agency establishes a different policy making fractions of an hour of leave transferable.
[38 FR 18446, July 11, 1973; 38 FR 26601, Sept. 24, 1973]
### §60555. Authorization of appropriations for research

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out sections 60551, 60552, and 60553 of this title, $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023.

(Pub. L. 110–199, title II, §245, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 692; Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §504(e), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 17555 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–391 substituted "and 60553 of this title, $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023" for "60553, and 60554 of this title, $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2009 and 2010".
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Krish Panu, certify that:

1.    I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of @Road, Inc.;

2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.    The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 15, 2005

/s/KRISH PANU

Krish
Panu
Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
Resolving CommercialDisputes in Russia

----
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20320 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Roberto Perez Bastar,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 605

- 1

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Perez
Bastar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez Bastar has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 27, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-20320 Document: 00516182725 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/27/2022No. 21

- 20320

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for a ppellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 21-20320 Document: 00516182725 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/27/2022