alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 838.1111 Amounts subject to child abuse judgment enforcement orders. ( a ) ( 1 ) Employee annuities, other than phased retirement annuities, and refunds of employee contributions are subject to child abuse enforcement orders only if all of the conditions necessary for payment of the employee annuity or refund of employee contributions to the former employee have been met, including, but not limited to— ( i ) Separation from the Federal service;
( ii ) Application for payment of the employee annuity or refund of employee contributions by the former employee; and
( iii ) Immediate entitlement to an employee annuity or refund of employee contributions.
( 2 ) Money held by an employing agency or OPM that may be payable at some future date is not available for payment under child abuse judgment enforcement orders.
( 3 ) OPM cannot pay a child abuse creditor a portion of an employee annuity before the employee annuity begins to accrue.
( b ) ( 1 ) Phased retirement annuities are subject to child abuse enforcement orders only if all of the conditions necessary for payment of the phased retirement annuity to the phased retiree have been met, including, but not limited to— ( i ) Entry of the employee into phased retirement status under subpart Q of part 831 of this chapter or part 848 of this chapter, respectively;
( ii ) Application for payment of the phased retirement annuity by the phased retiree; and
( iii ) The phased retiree's immediate entitlement to a phased retirement annuity.
( 2 ) Money held by an employing agency or OPM that may be payable at some future date is not available for payment under child abuse judgment enforcement orders.
( 3 ) OPM cannot pay a child abuse creditor a portion of a phased retirement annuity before the employee annuity begins to accrue.
( c ) Waivers of employee annuity payments under the terms of section 8345(d) or section 8465(a) of title 5, United States Code, exclude the waived portion of the annuity from availability for payment under a child abuse judgment enforcement order if such waivers are postmarked or received before the date that OPM receives the child abuse judgment enforcement order.
[59 FR 66637, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 79 FR 46631, Aug. 8, 2014]
### §80103. Constitution and bylaws

The corporation shall have a constitution and may adopt bylaws for the admission and qualifications of members, the management of its property, and the regulation of its affairs. The corporation may amend its constitution and bylaws.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1360.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80103 | 36:3503 (1st sentence). | Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 860, §3 (1st sentence), 31 Stat. 1439. |

Section

The words "at pleasure" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §502. Judicial review of rules and regulations

An action of the Secretary to which section 552(a)(1) or 553 of title 5 (or both) refers is subject to judicial review. Such review shall be in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5 and may be sought only in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. However, if such review is sought in connection with an appeal brought under the provisions of chapter 72 of this title, the provisions of that chapter shall apply rather than the provisions of chapter 7 of title 5.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 386; amended Pub. L. 110–389, title I, §102, Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 502 was renumbered section 1502 of this title.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 223(c) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–389 struck out "(other than an action relating to the adoption or revision of the schedule of ratings for disabilities adopted under section 1155 of this title)" after "refers".
CORRECTION: NRC ACCEPTING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMENTS FOR 

CALVERT CLIFFS NEW REACTOR APPLICATION UNTIL APRIL 14 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will accept until April 14 comments on the 

environmental issues the agency should consider in reviewing a Combined License (COL) 

application for a new reactor at the Calvert Cliffs site near Lusby, Md. An earlier NRC press 

release erroneously reported the deadline as April 4. 

 UniStar submitted the application’s environmental portion and associated information 

July 13, 2007, and supplemented the report Dec. 14, 2007. UniStar submitted the remainder of 

the application March 17. More details are available on the NRC Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col/calvert-cliffs.html . 

Unistar is applying for a license to build and operate an Evolutionary Power Reactor 

(EPR) at the Calvert Cliffs site, approximately 40 miles south of Annapolis. The EPR is a large 

pressurized water reactor with a design output of approximately 1,500 MWe. The EPR’s 

designer, Areva, filed an application Dec. 11, 2007, to certify the design, which is currently 

under construction at the Olkiluoto site in Finland. The EPR application, minus proprietary or 

security-related details, is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newlicensing/design-cert/epr.html . 

Comments on the scope of the environmental review should be submitted no later than 

April 14, either by mail to the Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative 

Services, Office of Administration, Mailstop T-6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001; via e-mail at CalvertCliffs.COLAEIS@nrc.gov ; or handdelivered to the NRC at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 

on federal workdays. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-071 April 3, 2008
Logistics for the September 28 Public Meeting to Discuss the 

Safety Culture Policy Statement 

Las Vegas, Nevada & Rockville, Maryland 

8:30-4:30 (PDT) & 10:30-7:30 (ET) 

Time Difference

This is a reminder to stakeholders about the three hour time difference between 

Rockville, MD and Las Vegas, NV. The meeting notice posted on the public website is 

in Pacific Daylight Time. Stakeholders who plan on attending at the Rockville, MD 

meeting site should plan accordingly. 

Lunch

Please be aware that each meeting attendee will be financially responsible for their own 

lunch at both the Las Vegas and Rockville meeting sites. 

Need Help During the Meeting? NRC points of contact 

If you are unable to connect to the meeting for some reason please email Laurette 

Moorin at Laurette.Moorin@nrc.gov. She will respond to any requests in the order in 

which they are received.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |  |  |                                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  |                                          
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 31, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ ANAND NALLATHAMBI                    
|                       |  |  |  | Anand Nallathambi Chief Executive
Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MICAH DAVIDSON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D17-1604

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2017

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Micah Davidson, Wewahitchka, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General 

Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the September 16, 2016,

order on pro se motion to withdraw plea upon remand, filed in Case Nos. 2011-CF1958, 2011-CF-1959, 2011-CF-1960, and 2014-CF-103021, in the Circuit Court in and 

for Volusia County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

ORFINGER, BERGER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2295

___________

Gene Allen Davenport, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Orville L. Coady, District Judge for the *

State of Nebraska, Thayer County *

Courthouse; John Does; Arthur P. * Appeal from the United States

Burnes, Attorney; Joseph Murray, * District Court for the

Attorney; Gary R. Young, Thayer * District of Nebraska

County Sheriff; Nancy C. McLaughlin, *

Clerk of the District Court; Patrick * [UNPUBLISHED]

Kenner, CEO, Thayer County Bank; *

Lloyd Vancleef, CEO, Citizens State *

Bank, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: September 3, 1997

 Filed: September 25, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable David L.

Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska.

-2-

Gene Allen Davenport appeals from a final order of the United States District

Court for the District of Nebraska, dismissing his complaint with prejudice for failing 1

to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, and denying his motions for

summary judgment and for default judgment. We have carefully reviewed the record

and affirm on the basis of the district court&s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny

his motion for judgment against two appellees.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Arthur G. Maloy, Deceased. Anne E. O’Sullivan et al., Appellants; Jane Maloy, Respondent.

Motion to amend the decision in this case. Motion granted, without costs. The decision of this court, handed down November 12, 1947 (272 App. Div. 1084), is amended by striking out the last paragraph therein and inserting the following paragraph: “ Decree modified by finding as a fact that the common-law marriage between decedent and respondent herein took place some time during the months of November and December, 1929, and as so modified, affirmed, on the law and the facts, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. Any inconsistent finding made by the Surrogate is hereby reversed.” Hill, P. J., Heffernan and Poster, JJ., concur; Brewster and Russell, JJ., dissent.
Order entered October 8, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00732
- CV ALBERT G. HILL, III, Appellant
V. ALBERT G. HILL, JR., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. DC
- 11
- 04523 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant and relator Albert G. Hill, III’s September 29, 2014 motion for additional temporary relief, the receiver’s response, and Hill III’s reply. Hill III asks us to stay a hearing on the receiver ’s September 26, 2014 application for fees and expenses for work performed after March 17, 2014 and all further hearings on fee applications . The receiver contends the motion is not ripe because the trial court has yet to rule on the application for fees, but that if a stay is granted, the Court should require Hill III to post a bond to protect the receiver as a party who will be affected by the temporary relief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.10(b) (“ As a condition of granting temporary relief, the court may req uire a bond to protect the parties who will be affected by the relief.”). Hill III responds that there is no authority for this Court to require a bond for fees and costs not yet adjudicated and that we should stay the trial court’shearing on the fee app lication in order to preserve the status quo pending the outcome of the appeal.

The Court GRANT S the motion for additional temporary relief and ORDER S the hearing on the receiver’s September 26, 2014 application for payment of fees and expenses and any h earings on further fee applications by the receiver stayed pending the disposition of this appeal and the consolidated petition for writ of mandamus. We DENY the receiver’s request for

a n additional bond. The bond required by our order of April 3, 2014 i n this appeal remains in place.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
§ 831.643 Time for filing applications for death benefits. ( a ) A survivor of a deceased employee, Member, or retiree, may file an application for annuity, personally or through a representative, at any time within 30 years after the death of the employee, Member, or retiree.
( b ) A former spouse claiming eligibility for an annuity based on § 831.683 may file an application at any time between November 8, 1984 and May 7, 1989. Within this period, the date that the first correspondence indicating a desire to file a claim is received by OPM will be treated as the application date for meeting timeliness deadlines and determining the commencing date of the survivor annuity under § 831.683 if the former spouse is eligible on that date.
[55 FR 9102, Mar. 12, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 52881, Oct. 13, 1993. Redesignated at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
§ 848.502 Computation of composite annuity at final retirement. ( a ) Subject to the adjustment described in paragraph (c) of this section, a phased retiree's composite retirement annuity at final retirement equals the sum obtained by adding— ( 1 ) The amount computed under § 848.501(a), increased by cost-of-living adjustments under § 848.503(c); and
( 2 ) The “fully retired phased component” computed under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) Subject to the requirements described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, a “fully retired phased component” equals the product obtained by multiplying— ( i ) The working percentage; by
( ii ) The amount of an annuity computed under 5 U.S.C. 8415 that would have been payable at the time of full retirement if the individual had not elected phased retirement status and as if the individual was employed on a full-time basis in the position occupied during the phased retirement period and before any reduction for survivor annuity.
( 2 ) In applying paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, the individual must be deemed to have a full-time schedule during the period of phased retirement. The deemed full-time schedule will consist of five 8-hour workdays each workweek, resulting in a 40-hour workweek. In determining the individual's deemed rate of basic pay during phased retirement, only basic pay for hours within the deemed full-time schedule will be considered, consistent with the definition of “full-time” in § 848.102. Any premium pay creditable as basic pay for retirement purposes for overtime work or hours outside the full-time schedule that an employee was receiving before phased retirement, such as standby duty pay under 5 U.S.C. 5545(c)(1) or customs officer overtime pay under 19 U.S.C. 267(a), may not be considered in determining a phased retiree's deemed rate of basic pay during phased retirement.
( 3 ) In computing the annuity amount under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the amount of unused sick leave credit equals the result of dividing the applicable percentage under 5 U.S.C. 8415(l) of the days of unused sick leave to the employee's credit at separation for full retirement, by the working percentage.
( c ) The composite retirement annuity computed under paragraph (a) of this section is adjusted by applying any reduction for any survivor annuity benefit.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67180-67181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors Finance Committee

TIME AND DATE: The Finance Committee of the Legal Services Corporation 
Board of Directors will meet November 20, 2004. The meeting will 
commence immediately following conclusion of the meeting of the 
Operations and Regulations Committee, the deliberations of which are 
anticipated to terminate at approximately 10 a.m. It is possible that 
the Committee meeting may convene earlier or later than expected, 
depending upon when the preceding committee concludes its business.

LOCATION: Westin Cincinnati, 21 E. 5th Street, Cincinnati, Ohio.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Approval of the minutes of the Committee's meeting of September 
10, 2004.
    3. Presentation of LSC's Financial Reports for the Twelve-Month 
Period Ending September 30, 2004.
    4. Update on the status of the FY 2005 Revised Temporary Operating 
Budget.

Closed Session

    5. Briefing \1\ by the Inspector General on the budget of the 
Office of the Inspector General.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Any portion of the closed session consisting solely of staff 
briefings does not fall within the Sunshine Act's definition of the 
term ``meeting'' and, therefore, the requirements of the Sunshine 
Act do not apply to any such portion of the closed session. 5 U.S.C. 
552(b)(a)(2) and (b). See also 45 CFR 1622.2 & 1622.3.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 67181]]

    6. Briefing by management on implications of increasing coverage 
limits under LSC's Directors & Officers liability insurance policy.

Open Session

    7. Consider and act on increasing the coverage limits under LSC's 
Directors & Officers liability insurance policy.
    8. Consider and act on other business.
    9. Public comment.
    10. Consider and act on adjournment of meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Patricia D. Batie, Manager of Board 
Operations, at (202) 295-1500.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Patricia D. Batie, at (202) 295-1500.

    Dated: November 11, 2004.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-25484 Filed 11-12-04; 12:25 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION				PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending **January 31, 2006**as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Andrew Reid**, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:				(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.				Dated:  March 10, 2006				                               __/s/ Andrew Reid____________________				                               Andrew Reid				                               Chief Executive Officer

----
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Superior Oil and Gas Co.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Daniel Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                November 13, 2007
            
            
            */s/
                Daniel Lloyd*Daniel
                Lloyd
              Chief
                Financial Officer





The
      above
      certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB
      or as a separate disclosure document.