alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2020046EN.01000701.xml

| 19.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 46/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 46/7

---

DECISION No 69/2019 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 5 February 2020

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2020/224]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.
  This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington, on 13 January 2020

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels, on 5 February 2020

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| Seibersdorf Labor GmbH
  An der B60
  2444 Seibersdorf
  AUSTRIA |
| --- |

Seibersdorf Labor GmbH

An der B60

2444 Seibersdorf

AUSTRIA

---
EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT


     This Equipment Purchase Agreement is made and entered into this 1st day
of April, 2003 between Kaibab Industries, Inc., an Arizona corporation
("Kaibab Industries" or "Seller") of  4602 East Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ
85018 and Unico, Incorporated, an Arizona corporation ("Unico" or "Buyer") of
P. O. Box 777, Magalia, CA  95954.

     WHEREAS, Kaibab Industries is the owner of the equipment and personal
property listed on Exhibit A attached hereto ("the Equipment") and desires to
sell the Equipment, and

     WHEREAS, Unico has agreed to purchase said Equipment pursuant to that
Mining Lease and Option to Purchase between the parties dated July 20, 2001,

     NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

     1.  Purchase and Sale; Purchase Price:  Kaibab Industries does hereby
sell and Unico does hereby purchase the Equipment described on Exhibit A
attached hereto for the price of $165,000, payable as follows:

     In 24 monthly installments of principal only in the amount of $2,000
     each, commencing April 1, 2003 and continuing on the first day of each
     and every month thereafter for 24 months.  The entire unpaid principal
     balance ($117,000) shall be all due and payable on April 1, 2005.

The purchase price shall be evidenced by a Promissory Note in the amount of
$165,000, which Note shall be secured by a Security Agreement covering the
Equipment (referred to in the Security Agreement as the "Collateral") and
Buyer agrees to execute a UCC -1 financing statement to perfect Seller's
security interest in the Collateral.

     2.  Acceleration Upon Exercise of Option:  Any unpaid balance of the
purchase price shall be all due and payable upon exercise of the option set
forth in that Revised Mining Lease and Option to Purchase between the parties
dated April 1, 2003.

     3.  Default; Interest:  Should Buyer fail to make any installment payment
when due hereunder, Seller may declare Buyer to be in default by giving
written notice of default to Buyer.  Buyer shall have 30 days from the date of
said notice to cure such default.  If Buyer's default is not cured within said
30 days, Seller may, at its election, accelerate payment of the balance due
hereunder and/or charge default interest on the entire unpaid principal
balance at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date said payment
was due until payment is brought current.

     4.  Entire Agreement; Governing Law:  This Equipment Purchase Agreement
sets forth the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the
Equipment and any amendments thereto shall be in writing.  This Equipment
Purchase Agreement shall be governed under the laws of the State of Utah.

SELLER:                                   BUYER:

Kaibab Industries, Inc.                   Unico, Incorporated

By: /s/ Gordon Whiting                    By: /s/ Ray C. Brown

Its: President                            Its: CEO
**** Warning: **

**** Error: **

**** Error: **

**** Info: **

**** Success: **

#### Error

								Your account is required to use two-factor authentication to access NIH/eRA systems. Please setup and use either a Login.gov account or an InCommon Federated account that supports NIH?s 								two-factor authentication standards. For further information, please see the following:							
                          -  Access eRA Modules Via Login.gov
                          -  Accessing eRA Modules Via an InCommon Federated Account

#### Error

								Login to NIH/eRA systems requires two-factor authentication. Either your institution does not support two-factor authentication, or your institution has not enabled your account for two-factor authentication. Please contact your local IT department (whoever manages your account) to inquire about the ability to support two-factor authentication for your account. If two-factor authentication is not available through your institution, you may also register for and use an account from Login.gov. 								For further information, please visit:							
                          - Access eRA Modules Via Login.gov . 
                          - Access eRA Modules Via an InCommon Federated Account  Or contact:  The InCommon Federation : help@incommon.org

#### Error

								PIV login is required. Please login using the **Login with PIV/CAC** option.							

#### Error

								The eRA credentials you entered are invalid and the account has now been locked. Please contact your organization's account administrator for assistance or use forgot password/unlock account link after 15 mins.							

#### Error

								The eRA credentials you entered are invalid, please contact your organization's account administrator for assistance.
#### § 290.1 Purpose.

This rule provides policy for a program to establish Regional Centers for the Transfer of Manufacturing Technology as well as the prescribed policies and procedures to insure the fair, equitable and uniform treatment of proposals for assistance. In addition, the rule provides general guidelines for the management of the program by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, as well as criteria for the evaluation of the Centers, throughout the lifecycle of financial assistance to the Centers by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting agenda.

# DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, November 23, 2004, 10 a.m.-12 noon.

# PLACE:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 1100,  Washington, DC 20005. (Metro Stop: Metro Center)

# AGENDA:

                        The Commission will receive updates and reports on the following:                               ( print page 65416)                            Title II Requirements Payments; Court Case Update; Results from the HAVA College Poll Worker Program; Election Day Data Collection Update. The Commission will also receive presentations on EAC Election Day Activities and other items. Presentations will include: Election Day  at the EAC Office; Election  Day Reports from the  Field; Election Day Summary; EAC Plan of Action for 2005.                    

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

DeForest B. Soaries, Jr.

Chairman, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-25339  Filed 11-9-04; 3:50 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-YN-M
### SUBCHAPTER VI—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES
B.C.D. 02-62

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Chicago Short Line Railway Company

AUG 2 7 2002

This is the decision ofthe Railroad Retirement Board regarding the continued 

status of Chicago Short Line Railway Company, as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seep) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment 

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seep) (RUIA).

Chicago Short Line was held to be an employer under the Acts effective March 30,

1901 (B.A. Number 4315). In April 2002, its assets were sold to the International 

Steel Group. Chicago Short Line last compensated employees in June 2002.

Section 202.11 ofthe Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever

such company or person loses any ofthe characteristics essential to the existence 

of an employer status.

Through the sale ofits assets and its cessation of operations, Chicago Short Line 

has lost the characteristics essential to the existence of an employer status.

Accordingly, the Board holds that Chicago Short Line ceased to be an employer 

under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts

effective with the close ofbusiness on June 30, 2002, the end ofthe month during 

which its employees were last compensated. Cf. Rev Ruling 82-99, 1982-2 C.B.

154, wherein the Internal Revenue Service ruled that a railroad ceases to be an

employer subject to taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act when the

railroad’s employees stop performing services in connection with the railroad’s

carrier activities.

CherrylT. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA# 4315
NRC PUBLISHES VOLUME 1 OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN

SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published the first volume of the agency staff’s 

safety evaluation report on the Department of Energy’s license application seeking authorization 

to construct a high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev. This first volume 

contains the staff’s evaluation of the “General Information” section of the DOE license 

application, which contains introductory and overview information about the proposed facility 

and its operation.

Publication of Volume 1 does not represent a licensing decision or indicate what an 

eventual licensing decision might be. No decision to grant or deny a construction authorization 

can be made until after completion of the NRC staff’s independent technical review of the 

application, the adjudicatory hearing and subsequent Commission review.

This is one of five planned volumes of the NRC staff’s safety evaluation report. 

The staff currently is continuing its safety review of the application according to the schedule it 

provided to the Construction Authorization Board conducting the adjudicatory hearing.

DOE submitted the license application on June 3, 2008. On March 3, 2010, DOE filed a 

motion to withdraw its license application for the Yucca Mountain repository with prejudice. On 

June 29, the Construction Authorization Board denied the withdrawal motion. DOE’s motion to 

withdraw its application is now before the Commission.

“Safety Evaluation Report Related to Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in a 

Geologic Repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Volume 1: General Information” (NUREG1949, Vol. 1) is available through the NRC’s website at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-147 August 23, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of XSInventory (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Cole, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ James Cole |
|--------|----------------|

James Cole

President and Principal Accounting Officer

|   | April 3, 2008 |
|--------|---------------|
#### § 875.411 May I continue my coverage when I am no longer a qualified relative?

If you are already enrolled as a qualified relative, you may continue your FLTCIP coverage if you subsequently lose qualified relative status (such as upon divorce), as long as the Carrier receives the required premium when due.
### §7330D. Inapplicability of Paperwork Reduction Act to research activities

Subchapter I of chapter 35 of title 44 (commonly referred to as the "Paperwork Reduction Act") shall not apply to the voluntary collection of information during the conduct of research by the Veterans Health Administration, including the Office of Research and Development, or individuals or entities affiliated with the Veterans Health Administration.

(Added Pub. L. 117–328, div. U, title I, §181(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5435.)
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*William Malone, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 12453;

Fourth District

August 15, 1974.

John F. McNichols, J. Daniel Stewart, and Daniel D. Yuhas, all of State Appellate Defenders Office, of Springfield, for appellant.

. Robert L. Welch, *State’s*Attorney, of Virginia, for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE TRAPP

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant appeals his conviction upon a negotiated plea to possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 402(b) of the Controlled *435Substances Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 56%, par. 1402(b)). A sentence of 1 to 2 years was imposed.

The only issue remaining upon appeal following oral argument is the sufficiency of the indictment alleging “possession *[of]*less than 200 grams of a substance containing a derivative of barbituric acid #

It is primarily contended that the indictment failed to specify the controlled substance, secobarbital, and that such omission could make defendant subject to a subsequent prosecution for the same acts.

 In *People v. Jones,*53 Ill.2d 460, 464, 292 N.E.2d 361, the court said:

> “The liberalization of criminal pleading also reflects a lessening in importance of the indictment’s secondary functions. The indictment as a means of informing defendants of particulars concerning the case is now far overshadowed by the array of discovery procedures available to the defense. Similarly, the time when an indictment defined the limits of jeopardy has passed and a prior prosecution on the same facts may be proved by resort to the record.”

 We find that the record includes the proceedings at a preliminary hearing wherein the date, time and place, together with persons present or having knowledge of the offense, are set out in detail. At such hearing secobarbital was identified as the substance. Such record establishes a bar to subsequent prosecution for the same offense.

 A plea of guilty waives any irregularity in an indictment which is not jurisdictional. *People v. Hubbard,*46 Ill.2d 563, 264 N.E.2d 144.

 In the absence of a genuine issue that defendant was unable to prepare a defense, or that he was subject to a subsequent prosecution for the same acts, the conviction and sentence must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

SMITH, P. J., and CRAVEN, J., concur.
NRC PRESENTING AT NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MEETING

APRIL 18 IN CHICAGO REGARDING NRC-SPONSORED CANCER RISK STUDY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will present information during the National 

Academy of Sciences’ (NAS) second committee meeting of the NRC-sponsored study, “Analysis 

of Cancer Risks in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities: Phase 1.” The meeting’s public session

will occur on April 18 at the Chicago Marriott Southwest at Burr Ridge in Burr Ridge, Ill., near 

Chicago. 

In the morning session, the NRC will explain the agency’s program for keeping offsite 

doses as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) and be available to answer committee member 

questions. Additional speakers in the morning will discuss the background and current status of 

U.S. cancer registries. In the afternoon session the committee will break-out into three technical 

working groups to discuss in-depth 1) dosimetry, 2) cancer registries, and 3) epidemiology and 

statistics. Members of the public are welcome to attend both the morning and afternoon open 

session, which will also be webcast. The NAS website has additional details

(dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/nrsb/agenda/agendadraft4-4.pdf ), although they are subject 

to change. General questions on the study can be sent via e-mail to crs@nas.edu. 

The NAS project (www.nationalacademies.org/cancerriskstudy) will update the 1990 

U.S. National Institutes of Health – National Cancer Institute (NCI) report, “Cancer in 

Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities.” The NRC uses the 1990 NCI report as a primary 

resource when communicating with the public about cancer mortality risk in counties that 

contain or are adjacent to nuclear power facilities. In the new study, the NRC is asking the NAS

to evaluate cancer diagnosis rates, in addition to mortality risk, for populations living near 

decommissioned, operating and proposed NRC-licensed nuclear facilities. Phase 1 of the NAS 

study will determine whether a technically defensible approach to meet the goals of the study 

request is feasible - and if so, the approach will be developed using scientifically sound processes 

for evaluating cancer risk that could be associated with nuclear facilities. 

The NAS is a non-governmental organization chartered by the U.S. Congress to advise 

the nation on issues of science, technology, and medicine. Through the National Research 

Council and Institute of Medicine, it carries out studies independently of the government using 

processes designed to promote transparency, objectivity, and technical rigor. More information 

on NAS methods for performing studies is available at

www.nationalacademies.org/studycommitteprocess.pdf .

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-063 April 8, 2011