alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JAN 2 6 2004

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

R.J. Gorman Railroad Company/Central Kentucky Lines, LLC

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of R.J. Corman Railroad Company/Central

Kentucky Lines, LLC (RJCC), as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et sea.).

Information regarding RJCC was provided by Ronald A. Lane,

outside counsel for RJCC. According to Mr. Lane, RJCC began doing

business in March 2003. Ronald Boles is the President of RJCC.

From March through September 30, 2003, RJCC’s operations were

conducted intermittently by three individuals employed by R.J.

Corman Railroad Company/Memphis Lines, an employer under the

Acts (B.A. No. 2598). RJCC currently has 17 employees.

RJCC began operations with a 14.9 mile railroad line formerly

owned by Lexington <S? Ohio Railroad Company, Inc., a covered

employer under the Acts (B.A. No. 5567). The purchase of this line

by R. J. Corman Equipment Company, LLC, a covered employer

under the Acts (B.A. No. 9014), and the lease to RJCC were

authorized in Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket Nos.

34325, 34326, and 34327. An acquisition on October 1, 2003, by R.

J. Corman Equipment Company from CSX Transportation of a 100-

mile railroad line and a lease to RJCC were authorized in Surface

Transportation Board Finance Docket Nos. 34386 and 34387. The

lines interchange with Norfolk Southern Corporation and CSX

Transportation, Inc.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §

231(a)(1)), insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction

of the Surface Transportation Board under Part A of

subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code;

BA#5589
-2-

Employer Status Determination

R.J. Gorman Railroad Company/Central Kentucky Lines, LLC

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

(45 U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same

definition, as does section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act

(26 U.S.C. § 3231).

The evidence of record establishes that RJCC is a carrier operating in

interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that RJCC is an

employer within the meaning of section l(a)(l)(i) of the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding

provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act as of March

1, 2003, the first date of the month in which it commenced

operations.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of East Penn Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Theresa M. Wasko,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

o     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

o     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in
      the Report.


/s/ Theresa M. Wasko
-------------------------------------------------------
Theresa M. Wasko, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 10, 2004


                                    Page 28
#### Genevieve Filby, Respondent, v. John Gaden, Appellant.

A wrongful trespass or eviction of a tenant by the landlord constitutes a tort and renders the landlord liable in damages for any loss the tenant may suffer as a natural consequence of the wrongful act. (2 Clark on New York Law of Damages, § 749.) The record herein contains no evidence of injuries, or the extent thereof, which are compensable in this action. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
# L_2022175EN.01002901.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 16/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1064]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1889 of 23 July 2021 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 as regards the extension of measures for temporary relief from the slot utilisation rules due to the COVID-19 crisis (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1889 of 23 July 2021 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 as regards the extension of measures for temporary relief from the slot utilisation rules due to the COVID-19 crisis (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 64b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32021 R 1889: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1889 of 23 July 2021 (OJ L 384, 29.10.2021, p. 20).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32021 R 1889: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1889 of 23 July 2021 (OJ L 384, 29.10.2021, p. 20).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1889 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 384, 29.10.2021, p. 20.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Eugene H. Wood, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, by default. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [203 Misc. 809.]
#### Henry M. Levengston, Respondent, v. Lamb Publishing Company and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-139 October 24, 2007

 

NRC ISSUES NEW EDITION OF INFORMATION DIGEST

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its 2007-2008 edition of the Information 

Digest, containing up-to-date information about the agency, domestic and worldwide nuclear energy, 

nuclear materials safety, and radioactive waste in an easy-to-read format. 

 This edition, NUREG-1350, Volume 19, provides an expanded discussion about future U.S. 

commercial nuclear power reactor licensing. It also features enhanced graphics and illustrations as well 

as an updated design. 

 The Information Digest, published annually, provides a compilation of NRC-related and 

nuclear-related data and is intended to serve as a quick reference to major facts about the agency and 

the industry it regulates. It is available electronically at: http://www.nrc.gov in the lower left-hand 

corner of the NRC’s homepage. A single copy is available free from NRC by sending requests to: 

DISTRIBUTION@nrc.gov or a fax to: 301-415-2289. Multiple copies may be purchased from the 

U.S. Government Printing Office by phone at 1-866-512-1800 or locally at 202-512-1800; by internet 

at: www.gpoaccess.gov; or by fax at: 202-512-2250 or from the National Technical Information 

Service at 1-800-553-6847 or locally at 703 605-6000; by e-mail: orders@ntis.gov; or fax: 703 605-

6900. 

### 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### Frederick J. Helms, Appellant, v. Mila L. Helms (now Mila L. Neiss), Respondent.

All concur.
Order entered January 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00111-CV

ALEJANDRO CASILLAS PRIETO, Appellant

V.

RICHARD RENE ALAMIA, ET AL., RAFAEL DE LA GARZA, II & (FNU) DE LA 

GARZA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-02393-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 21, 2018 second pro se motion for leave to 

make documentation part of the appeal record. Appellant filed his first motion on November 26, 

2018 with various correspondence attached explaining why he failed to serve one defendant at 

that defendant’s proper address. By order dated November 28, 2018, the Court ruled as follows:

The documents attached to appellant’s motion are part of the appellate record 

to the extent they are attached to appellant’s motion. To the extent appellant’s 

motion was intended to supplement the clerk’s record with the documents, the 

motion is DENIED.

Appellant states in the pending motion he does not understand “if the attached documents were 

or were not made part of the case/appeal record,” asks for clarification, and resubmits the 

documents “in the event” they were not “ma[d]e part of the record.”
We determine the motion as follows. To clarify, the documents are not part of the clerk’s 

record. Although the documents are on file with the Court, they do not constitute part of the 

record that will be considered in determining this appeal. To the extent appellant resubmits the 

documents, we construe the motion as a request for reconsideration and DENY the motion. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
# L_2021337EN.01003501.xml

| 23.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 242/2018

of 5 December 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2021/1509]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive (EU) 2015/720 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive (EU) 2015/720 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 amending Directive 94/62/EC as regards reducing the consumption of lightweight plastic carrier bags (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 7 (European Parliament and Council Directive 94/62/EC) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32015 L 0720: Directive (EU) 2015/720 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 (OJ L 115, 6.5.2015, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32015 L 0720: Directive (EU) 2015/720 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 (OJ L 115, 6.5.2015, p. 11).’

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/720 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 December 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 December 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

The Secretaries

To the EEA Joint Committee

Hege M. HOFF

Mikołaj KARŁOWSKI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 115, 6.5.2015, p. 11.

1

(*)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
#### VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 01-1203.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 27, 2002.

Before SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the record from the National Labor Relations Board (Board) and on the briefs and arguments by counsel.

The petitioner seeks review of the Board’s April 18, 2001 decision finding that the petitioner violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (5), by refusing to bargain with Local 141 of the National Staff Nurses Union, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (Union) which had been elected to represent a unit consisting of 15 registered nurses and one pharmacist at the petitioner’s Winslow Clinic, a non-acute care outpatient facility on Bainbridge Island in Washington State. The petitioner challenges the composition of the bargaining unit (“[a]ll registered nurses and all other professional employees employed by the Employer at its Winslow (Bainbridge Island) facility, but excluding all physicians, all nonprofessional employees, and guards and supervisors as defined by the act”) because it excludes all employees at the petitioner’s other facilities, all physicians at Winslow Clinic and two employees, a computer application specialist and a dietitian, who periodically visit various of the petitioner’s facilities including Winslow Clinic. “The Board is entitled to deference on its selection of an appropriate unit” and its unit determination will be upheld “unless it is arbitrary or not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” *Country Ford Trucks, Inc. v. NLRB,*229 F.3d 1184, 1189 (D.C.Cir.2000). The Board’s determination in this case is not arbitrary and is supported by the evi*5dence. The Board reasonably (1) concluded the petitioner had not rebutted the Board’s established “presumption that single-facility units are appropriate in the health care industry,” *Manor Healthcare Corp.,*285 N.L.R.B. 224, 225 (1987) (citations omitted); (2) excluded physicians who, in contrast to the nurses and the pharmacist, “direct all other patient care employees, earn substantially more than other professionals, and have different direct supervision,” App. 7; and (3) excluded the computer application specialist and dietitian who both “are administratively attached elsewhere, and are assigned to perform their specialized work in the Win-slow Clinic from time to time, as needed, analogous to consultants or floating repair persons with a route,” App. 5-6. It is therefore

ORDERED that the petition for review is denied and that the cross-application for enforcement is granted.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).
§ 890.1027 Cases where an additional fact-finding proceeding is required. ( a ) *Criteria for holding fact-finding proceeding.* The debarring official shall request another OPM official (“presiding official”) to hold an additional fact-finding proceeding if: ( 1 ) Facts material to the proposed debarment have not been adjudicated in a prior due process proceeding; and
( 2 ) These facts are genuinely in dispute, based on the entire administrative record available to the debarring official.
( b ) *Qualification to serve as presiding official.* The presiding official is designated by the OPM Director or another OPM official authorized by the Director to make such designations. The presiding official shall be a senior official who is qualified to conduct informal adjudicative proceedings and who has had no previous contact with the proposed debarment or the contest.
( c ) *Effect on contest.* The debarring official shall defer a final decision on the contest pending the results of the fact-finding proceeding.
§ 841.111 Garnishment of payments after disbursement. ( a ) Payments that are covered by 5 U.S.C. 8470(a) and made by direct deposit are subject to 31 CFR part 212, Garnishment of Accounts Containing Federal Benefit Payments.
( b ) This section may be amended only by a rulemaking issued jointly by the Department of the Treasury and the agencies defined as a “benefit agency” in 31 CFR part 212.
[76 FR 9962, Feb. 23, 2011]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-118 September 27, 2006

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET OCTOBER 4-6 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

will hold a public meeting Oct. 4-6 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, two issues

related to new reactors: the development of the Master Integrated Plan, and proposed updates to

regulatory guides and standard review plan sections. The committee will also discuss the draft final

revision 3 to Regulatory Guide 1.7, “Control of Combustible Gas Concentrations in Containment.” 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and end at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 7 p.m.

on Thursday, and 1 p.m. on Friday. A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2006/ . 

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting should

contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. To pursue videoconferencing services, contact Theron

Brown, at 301-415-8066.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants and

related safety issues.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's web site.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge, based
upon their review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002, of Southern Community Bancorp (the Report), that:



| | (i)  |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                          
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.

|                      |  |                                                                                                                      
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 12, 2003 |  | /s/ Charlie W. Brinkley                                                                                              
|                      |  |                                                                                                                      
|                      |  | Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                      |  |                                                                                                                      
|                      |  | /s/ John G. Squires                                                                                                  
|                      |  |                                                                                                                      
|Date:  March 12, 2003 |  | John G. Squires
President and Chief Financial Officer
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20294 c/w No. 11-20295 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAY NARCISO CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant

------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RAY CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-652-1 USDC No. 4:09-CR-199-3 U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Sep tem ber 1 5, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk Case: 11-20294 Document: 00511603766 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2011No. 11-20294 c/w No. 11-20295 Before BENAVIDES, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned appeals are CONSOLIDATED. Ray Narciso Contreras pleaded guilty in separate cases of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute methamphetami n e a n d was sentenced to concurrent 210-month terms of imprisonment. Judgment was entered in both cases on November 17, 2010, and his notices of appeal were dated April 12, 2011, and were filed in the record on Ap r il 20, 2011. Contreras’s notices of appeal were filed five months aft e r t h e final judgments were entered and beyon d t h e time for extending the appeal p e r i o d u n d e r Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4). See F E D
. R. AP P
. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). Contreras did not file a timely notice of appeal as to either appeal, and he has not asserted any ground for excusable neglect. Therefore, his appeals are DISMISSED as untimely. See United States v. Leijano-Cruz , 473 F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 200 6)

. Accordingly, his motions for appointment of counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED AS MOOT.

Pur sua nt to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. 2 Case: 11-20294 Document: 00511603766 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2011
BISNIS Search For Partners, December 15, 1997

----

The Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS) has created theSearch for Partners program to help U.S. companies find investment opportunities in theexpanding markets of the Newly Independent States (NIS) of the former Soviet Union.The opportunities are provided solely as an informational service and do not represent anendorsement by the U.S. Department of Commerce.  Verification of these leads is theresponsibility of the reader.
Index of Investment Opportunities: