alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2022267EN.01003501.xml

| 13.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/35

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 186/2022

of 10 June 2022

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1886]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/352 of 29 November 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 as regards the 2021 update of the taxonomy laid down in the regulatory technical standards on the single electronic reporting format (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/352 of 29 November 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815 as regards the 2021 update of the taxonomy laid down in the regulatory technical standards on the single electronic reporting format (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 29dd (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32022 R 0352: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/352 of 29 November 2021 (OJ L 77, 7.3.2022, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32022 R 0352: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/352 of 29 November 2021 (OJ L 77, 7.3.2022, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/352 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 June 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 82/2020 of 12 June 2020 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 77, 7.3.2022, p. 1.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

(2)  Not yet published in Official Journal.

2

---
#### § 839.242 Do these rules apply to me if I had multiple errors?

You must be in the wrong retirement plan for at least 3 years of Federal service after December 31, 1986. You need not be in the same wrong retirement plan during the entire 3-year period. If you had more than one type of erroneous retirement coverage, then you will have a retirement plan election under these rules if one of the errors is of a type that qualifies you for an election.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
AT MARCH 31,  2000,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         36,677
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    8,715
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51,508
<PP&E>                                         125,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,548
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          665,728
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,849
<OTHER-SE>                                     (167,913)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,664
<SALES>                                        447,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               457,968
<CGS>                                          46,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,556,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,154,564)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,154,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,154,564)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.28)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.38






                                            As of January 1, 2004


Mr. Jonathan M. Tisch
667 Madison Avenue
New York, New York  10021

Dear Mr. Tisch:

  Reference is made to your Employment Agreement with Loews Corporation (the
"Company"), dated January 1, 1999, as amended by agreements dated as of
January 1, 2002 and as of January 1, 2003 (the "Employment Agreement").

  This will confirm our agreement that the Employment Agreement is amended as
follows:

  1. Term of Employment.  The period of your employment under and pursuant to
     ------------------
the Employment Agreement is hereby extended for an additional period through
and including March 31, 2005 upon all the terms, conditions and provisions of
the Employment Agreement, as hereby amended.

  2. Compensation.  You shall be paid as basic compensation (the "Basic
     ------------
Compensation") for your services to the Company and its subsidiaries under and
pursuant to the Employment Agreement a salary at the rate of Nine Hundred
Seventy-Five Thousand ($975,000) Dollars per annum for the extension period
January 1, 2004 through  March 31, 2005. Basic Compensation shall be payable
in accordance with the Company's customary payroll practices as in effect from
time to time, and shall be subject to such increases as the Board of Directors
of the Company, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine.

  3. Incentive Compensation Plan.  In addition to receipt of Basic
      ---------------------------
Compensation under the Employment Agreement, you shall participate in the
Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers of the Company (the
"Compensation Plan") and shall be eligible to receive incentive compensation
under the Compensation Plan as may be awarded in accordance with its terms.

  4. Other Compensation.  The compensation provided pursuant to this Letter
     ------------------
Agreement shall be exclusive of compensation and fees, if any, to which you
may be entitled as an officer or director of a subsidiary of the Company.

  Except as herein modified or amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.










Mr. Jonathan M. Tisch
As of January 1, 2004
Page 2


  If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, would you please
sign the enclosed duplicate copy of this Letter Agreement at the place
indicated below and return the same to us for our records.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            LOEWS CORPORATION


                                            By: /s/Gary W. Garson
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Gary W. Garson
                                                Senior Vice President

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

/s/Jonathan M. Tisch
-------------------------------
       Jonathan M. Tisch
B.C.n. 01-37

Employer Status Determination

Northwestern Pacific Railway Company, L.L.C.

APR 3 0 2001

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning 

the status of the Northwestern Pacific Railway Company, L.L.C.

(NWPY) as a covered employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. § 231, et seep) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seep) (RUIA).

NWPY is the lessee operator on approximately 317.6 miles of rail line

properties of the North Coast Railroad Authority, the Northwestern

Pacific Railroad Authority and the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and

Transportation District. NWPY connects with the California Western

Railroad at Willits, California and the Union Pacific Railroad at

Lombard, California. Actual operations began on February 13, 2001.

Surface Transportation Board authority for NWPY is set forth in STB

Finance Docket No. 33998, decided January 30, 2001.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle IV of Title

49 [45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(l)(i)].

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition as

does section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. §

3231).

The evidence establishes that NWPY is a carrier by railroad

within the meaning of section l(a)(l)(i) of the Railroad Retirement

Act. It is determined that Northwestern Pacific Railway

BA# 2793
t

-2-

Northwestern Pacific Railway Company, L.L.C.

Company, L.L.C., became an employer covered under the Railroad

Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act on

February 13, 2001, the date it began operations.

Cherryl T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk September 9 , 2020

15 8 240 ( 95 )

SUSAN BISIO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 158240

v COA: 335422

Oakland CC: 2015

- 150462

- CZ

THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF

CLARKSTON,

Defendant

- Appellee

.

_______________________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellant to file a response to

the joint answer of amici Michigan Municipal League, Michigan Townships Association,

and Michigan Association o f Municipal Attorneys to the motion for rehearing is

GRANTED. The response submitted on August 31, 202 0 , is accepted for filing

.
#### § 847.911 Is an employee who elects to credit NAFI service to qualify for an immediate FERS retirement under subpart H of this part eligible for an FERS annuity supplement under 5 CFR 842 subpart E?

An FERS Annuity Supplement is not payable to a retiree who elects to credit NAFI service under subpart H of this part.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-11-0039 - Final Rule:  Definition of Construction in 10 CFR Parts 30, 36, 39, 40, 51, 70, and 150

Accession Number: ML110770493

Date Released: Friday, April 1, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML110770501 - SECY-11-0039 - Final Rule: Definition of Construction in 10 CFR Parts 30, 36, 39, 40, 51, 70, and 150 (6 page(s), 3/18/2011)
    - ML110770513 - SECY-11-0039 - Enclosure: Final Rule: 10 CFR Parts 30,36, 39, 40, 51, 70, and 150 (64 page(s), 3/18/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Harold J. GIBBONS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15040.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 30, 1954.

Stanley M. Rosenblum, Mortimer Rosecan, St. Louis, Mo., and Merle L. Silverstein, University City, Mo., for appellant.

Harry Richards, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., and Max Goldschein, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of BAS Consulting, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, B. Alva Schoomer,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

        1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or
                 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and result of
                 operations of the Company.


/s/ B. Alva Schoomer
B. Alva Schoomer
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2005
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**uBid.com
      Holdings, Inc.**





**CERIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1.
 
      The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of uBid.com Holdings, Inc. for the quarter
      ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of uBid.com
      Holdings, Inc.




Date,
                May 14, 2008
            /s/
                Miguel A. Martinez, Jr.By:
                Miguel A. Martinez, Jr.Chief
                Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 477-478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-18-012: NIDDK 
Program Projects in Gastroenterology.
    Date: February 5, 2019.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7349, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-8894, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa989f9d8f9794ba94939e9e91d4949392d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb898e8c9e8685ab85828f8f80c5858283c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 478]]


    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00271 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 890.1415 Reconsideration of enrollment and eligibility decisions and appeal rights. ( a ) The tribal employer shall establish or identify an independent dispute resolution panel to adjudicate appeals of determinations made by a tribal employer denying an individual's status as a tribal employee eligible to enroll in FEHB or denying a change in the type of enrollment (*i.e.:* to or from self only coverage) under this subpart. Such panel shall be authorized to enforce enrollment and eligibility decisions. The tribal employer shall notify affected individuals of this panel and its functions.
( b ) Under procedures set forth by the tribal employer, an individual may file a written request to the independent dispute resolution panel to reconsider an initial decision of the tribal employer under this subpart. A reconsideration decision made by the panel must be issued to the individual in writing and must fully state the findings and reasons for the findings. The panel may consider information from the tribal employer, the individual, or another source. The panel must retain a file of its documentation until December 31 of the 3rd year after the year in which the decision was made, and must provide the file to OPM upon request.
( c ) If the panel determines that the individual is ineligible to enroll in FEHB as a tribal employee or to change enrollment, the individual may request that OPM reconsider the denial. Such a request must be made in writing and any decision by OPM will be binding on the tribal employer.
( d ) OPM may request a panel decision file during the retention period described at paragraph (b) of this section. Panel decisions remain subject to final OPM authority to correct errors, as set forth in § 890.1406.
### **CHAPTER 39—AUTOMOBILES AND ADAPTIVE EQUIPMENT FOR CERTAIN DISABLED VETERANS AND MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES**

Sec.
3901.
Definitions.
3902.
Assistance for providing automobile and adaptive equipment.
3903.
Limitations on assistance; special training courses.
3904.
Research and development.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This chapter as added by Pub. L. 91–666, §2(a), Jan. 11, 1971, 84 Stat. 1998, constitutes a general revision of the provisions of a prior chapter 39, as enacted by Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1215, and amended thereafter. The analysis in the original consisted of the following provisions:

"Automobiles For Disabled Veterans" in the chapter heading.

"Veterans eligible for assistance" in item 1901.

"Limitation on types of assistance furnished and veterans otherwise entitled" in item 1902.

"Limitation on amounts paid by United States" in item 1903.

"Prohibition against duplication of benefits" in item 1904.

"Applications" in item 1905.

#### Amendments

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(b)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, renumbered items 1901 to 1904 as 3901 to 3904, respectively.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–581, title II, §205(b)(1), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2858, struck out "; coordination with other Federal programs" in item 1904.

**1974**—Pub. L. 93–538, §§4(c), 5(b), Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1737, inserted "; special training courses" in item 1903, and added item 1904.
#### In the Matter of Katherine C. Millicker, Appellant, against Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 of the Towns of Carmel and Putnam Valley et al., Respondents.

In our opinion, section *8503013 of the Education Law requires the principal to include the names of all teachers in the lists and reports he is required to furnish to the district superintendent of schools. The principal is vested with no discretion to determine who shall be recommended for appointment on tenure. Such' discretion is vested solely in the district superintendent of schools. Since the proceeding is nominally called in the petition one to review a determination, but is actually one to compel performance of a duty specifically enjoined by law, the four months’ limitation does not begin to run until after proof of respondents’ refusal, following appellant’s demand, to perform that duty. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 1286; *Matter of O’Connell*v. *Kern,*287 N. Y. 297, 301.) Since there is no proof of such a refusal more than four months before the institution of the proceeding, the proceeding commenced September 2, 1948, is timely brought. Respondents are not granted permission to answer because it appears from their brief that they do not desire such permission and are willing that appellant be granted the relief to which this court believes she is entitled. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.