alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 6801.106 Prohibition on supervisory employees' seeking credit from institutions involved in work assignments. ( a ) *Prohibition on supervisory employee's seeking credit.* ( 1 ) A supervisory employee may not, on his or her own behalf, or on behalf of his or her spouse or child or anyone else (including any business or nonprofit organization), seek or accept credit from, or renew or renegotiate credit with, a depository institution or any of its affiliates if the institution or affiliate is a party to an application, enforcement action, investigation, or other particular matter involving specific parties pending before the Board and: ( i ) The supervisory employee is assigned to the matter; or
( ii ) The supervisory employee is aware of the pendency of the matter and knows that he or she will participate in the matter by action, advice or recommendation.
( 2 ) The prohibition in paragraph (a)(1) of this section also applies for three months after the supervisory employee's participation in the matter has ended.
( b ) *Credit sought by spouse and other related persons.* A supervisory employee must disqualify himself or herself from participating (by action, advice or recommendation) in any application, enforcement action, investigation or other particular matter involving specific parties to which a depository institution or any of its affiliates is a party as soon as the supervisory employee learns that any of the following related persons are seeking or have sought or accepted credit from, or have renewed or renegotiated credit with, the depository institution or any of its affiliates while the matter is pending before the Board: ( 1 ) The employee's spouse or dependent child;
( 2 ) A company or business if the employee or the employee's spouse or dependent child owns or controls more than 10 percent of its equity; or
( 3 ) A partnership if the employee, or the employee's spouse or dependent child is a general partner.
( c ) *Exception.* The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section and the disqualification requirement in paragraph (b) of this section do not apply with respect to credit obtained through the use of a credit card or overdraft protection on terms and conditions available to the public.
( d ) *Waivers.* The Board's Designated Agency Ethics Official, after consulting with the relevant division director, may grant a written waiver from the prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section, or the disqualification requirement in paragraph (b) of this section, based on a determination that participation in matters otherwise prohibited by this section would not create an appearance of loss of impartiality or use of public office for private gain, and would not otherwise be inconsistent with the Office of Government Ethics' Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (5 CFR part 2635) or prohibited by law.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Cole,
President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ James
Cole


James
Cole, President and


Principal
Accounting Officer


August
14, 2008
#### Sarah Schultz, Appellant, *v.*Leonard Baker, Respondent.

Third Department,

January 7, 1948.

*187
      *Unger man & Lynn,*attorneys *(Morton M. Z. Lynn*of counsel), for appellant.

*Garter & Gonboy,*attorneys *(James Gonboy*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal from an order dismissing the complaint under rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice. The action is for damages claimed to have been received by plaintiff-appellant on or about May 9, 1944, while riding in a passenger bus owned by the Albany Transit Company, which was being driven in a negligent manner by its employee, the defendant in this action. The plaintiff was represented by other counsel in two previous actions brought in connection with the same claimed injury, the first against the Albany Transit Company, the complaint being verified and dated September 5, 1944, which action was discontinued by stipulation in December, 1944; the second was commenced in February, 1945, against the United Transportation Co., Inc., and therein it was asserted that the transportation company was the owner of the bus which was being driven in a negligent manner by its employee, the defendant-respondent in this appeal The latter action was tried and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, which was entered in the Office of the Clerk of Bensselaer County. In August, 1945, the defendant transportation company deposited the sum then due upon that judgment with the Clerk of Bensselaer County, whereupon that official certified that the judgment was duly satisfied and discharged and notified this appellant, plaintiff in that action, and her then attorney. Appellant, through her present attorneys now brings this third action, the complaint alleging that the defendant-respondent herein was driving a bus belonging to the Albany Transit Company.

Appellant has had but one injury which was received while riding in a bus of which the present respondent was the driver. There was a single cause of action, and having successfully prosecuted it to judgment in an action against the United Transportation Co., Inc., no cause of action remains which may be prosecuted against the defendant-respondent herein. *(Wolf*v. *Kenyon,*242 App. Div. 116; *Luce*v. *New York, Chicago & St. Louis R. R. Co.,*213 App. Div. 374, appeal dismissed 241 N. Y. 541.)

*188
      *Daly*v. *Terpening*(287 N. Y. 611) cited by appellant, has no application.

The order should be affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements.

Hill, P. J., Heffernau, Foster and Deyo, JJ., concur; Russell, J., taking no part.

Order affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. -
### §200312. Annual report

Not later than March 1 of each year, the corporation shall submit a report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report may consist of a report on the proceedings of the national encampment. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1455.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200312 | 36:546. | Aug. 20, 1954, ch. 774, §16, 68 Stat. 752. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 206 of House Document No. 103–7.
§ 835.603 Notification of intent to collect. ( a ) *Notification before submission to the IRS.* A request for reduction of an IRS income tax refund will be made only after OPM makes a determination that an amount is owed and past-due and gives or makes a reasonable attempt to give the debtor 60 days written notice of the intent to collect by IRS tax refund offset.
( b ) *Contents of notice.* OPM's notice of intention to collect by IRS tax refund offset (Notice of Intent) will state: ( 1 ) The amount of the debt;
( 2 ) That unless the debt is repaid within 60 days from the date of OPM's Notice of Intent, OPM intends to collect the debt by requesting the IRS to reduce any amounts payable to the debtor as a Federal income tax refund by an amount equal to the amount of the debt and all accumulated interest and other charges;
( 3 ) A mailing address for forwarding any written correspondence and a contract name and a telephone number for any questions; and
( 4 ) That the debtor may present evidence to OPM that all or part of the debt is not past due or legally enforceable by— ( i ) Sending a written request for a review of the evidence to the address provided in the notice;
( ii ) Stating in the request the amount disputed and the reasons why the debtor believes that the debt is not past-due or is not legally enforceable;
( iii ) Including in the request any documents that the debtor wishes to be considered or stating that the additional information will be submitted within the remainder of the 60-day period.
#### Raffaele Conte, Appellant, v. Rosina Conte, Respondent.

Order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
# L_2018142EN.01001101.xml

| 7.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 142/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 142/11

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 113/2017

of 13 June 2017

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2018/806]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) 2016/2032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 on rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) 2016/2032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 on rail transport statistics, as regards the collection of data on goods, passengers and accidents (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 7 (Regulation (EC) No 91/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 2032: Regulation (EU) 2016/2032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 (OJ L 317, 23.11.2016, p. 105).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 2032: Regulation (EU) 2016/2032 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 (OJ L 317, 23.11.2016, p. 105).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/2032 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 June 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 23.11.2016, p. 105.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2022291EN.01006501.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/65

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 175/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2167]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2019/418 of 13 March 2019 amending Decisions (EU) 2017/1214, (EU) 2017/1215, (EU) 2017/1216, (EU) 2017/1217, (EU) 2017/1218 and (EU) 2017/1219 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2019/418 of 13 March 2019 amending Decisions (EU) 2017/1214, (EU) 2017/1215, (EU) 2017/1216, (EU) 2017/1217, (EU) 2017/1218 and (EU) 2017/1219 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The following indent is added in points 2e (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1218), 2h (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1216), 2r (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1214), 2zg (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1215) and 2zh (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1219):






  ‘— | 32019 D 0418: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/418 of 13 March 2019 (OJ L 73, 15.3.2019, p. 188).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

The following indent is added in points 2e (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1218), 2h (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1216), 2r (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1214), 2zg (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1215) and 2zh (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1219):

‘—

32019 D 0418: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/418 of 13 March 2019 (OJ L 73, 15.3.2019, p. 188).’

| 2. | The following is added in point 2t (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1217):

  ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32019 D 0418: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/418 of 13 March 2019 (OJ L 73, 15.3.2019, p. 188).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The following is added in point 2t (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1217):

‘, as amended by:

—

32019 D 0418: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/418 of 13 March 2019 (OJ L 73, 15.3.2019, p. 188).’

Article 2

The text of Decision (EU) 2019/418 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 73, 15.3.2019, p. 188.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
# L_2023078EN.01004001.xml

| 16.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 90/2020

of 18 June 2020

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/539]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) 2020/561 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices, as regards the dates of application of certain of its provisions (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) 2020/561 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 amending Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices, as regards the dates of application of certain of its provisions (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 11 (Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| | ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32020 R 0561: Regulation (EU) 2020/561 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 (OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘, as amended by:

—

32020 R 0561: Regulation (EU) 2020/561 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2020 (OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 18).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2020/561 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 18 June 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 288/2019 of 13 December 2019 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 18 June 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Clara GANSLANDT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 130, 24.4.2020, p. 18.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

(2)  
  OJ L 68, 5.3.2020, p. 24.

2

---
§ 875.406 May I change my coverage? ( a ) You may make the following changes to your coverage: ( 1 ) At any time outside of a suspension period described in § 875.110, you may apply to increase your coverage with full underwriting.
( 2 ) If you increase your coverage by adding to your daily benefit amount, the premiums for the additional coverage will be based on your age, prevailing premium rates, and coverage rules in effect at the time you purchase the additional coverage.
( 3 ) For other types of coverage increases, your entire premium will be based on your age, prevailing premium rates, and coverage rules in effect at the time you purchase the increased coverage. Any increase in coverage will take effect on the 1st day of the month following the date the Carrier approves your request for an increase.
( b ) You may decrease your coverage at any time, although any decrease will be subject to coverage rules at the time of the decrease. Decreased coverage takes effect on the 1st day of the month after the Carrier receives your request. You will not receive any refund of premiums paid for coverage you held before the decrease; however, your subsequent premiums will be reduced based on your new, lower level of coverage. The Carrier will refund or credit any portion of premium paid in advance for the period following the date on which you decrease your coverage.
( c ) You may cancel your coverage at any time. ( 1 ) If you cancel during the free look period, your premiums will be refunded to you.
( 2 ) If you cancel your coverage at any time other than during the free look period, cancellation will take effect on your requested cancellation date or at the end of the period covered by your last premium payment, whichever occurs first. You will not receive any refund of premiums paid, other than any premiums paid in advance for the period following the effective date of your cancellation of coverage, and you will not have to pay any more premiums unless you owed retroactive premiums.
[68 FR 5534, Feb. 4, 2003, as amended at 87 FR 68599, Nov. 16, 2022]
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No: II-07-040                                                     August 29, 2007CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416      E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO MEET WITH SOUTHERN NUCLEAR ABOUT INSPECTION FINDING ATFARLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with Southern NuclearOperating Company officials to discuss an inspection finding at the Farley nuclear power plant nearDothan, Ala.

The meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, Sept. 12, at 10:00 a.m. in the NRC Region II office,Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street in Atlanta, Ga. The meeting is open toobservation by members of the public and the press.

The NRC has preliminarily determined that an inspection finding at the Farley nuclear powerplant related to valves associated with the Unit 2 residual heat removal system containment suctionsupply is "yellow," meaning the issue may have substantial safety significance that could result inadditional NRC inspections and potentially other NRC action.

Under the NRC reactor oversight process, inspection findings are evaluated using a significancedetermination process and assigned a color indicating its safety significance. Findings with very lowsafety significance are labeled "green." "White" findings have low to moderate safety significance,"yellow" findings have substantial safety significance, and "red" findings have high safety significance.

The NRC staff completed a special inspection in May that reviewed the circumstancessurrounding Unit 2 residual heat removal containment sump suction valve failures which occurredduring surveillance testing in April 2006 and January 2007. During that inspection, the NRC identifieda failure to promptly identify and correct the condition, and the finding was determined to involve aviolation of NRC requirements. The “yellow” finding is preliminary and this meeting permits SouthernNuclear an opportunity to discuss the issue with the NRC before NRC makes a final decision regardingthe safety significance of the finding. 

According to NRC officials, the condition does not present a current safety concern becauseSouthern Nuclear took interim corrective actions to ensure the valve operates properly after the failurein January and took long-term corrective actions during a refueling outage this spring.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### § 200.110 Priorities and time of completion.

Schedule work assignments for calibrations and other tests will generally be made in the order in which confirmed requests are received. However, Government work may be given priority. On the regular services, the workload is usually such that the turn-around interval, between the date a customer's apparatus is received and the date it is prepared for return shipment, will be not more than 45 days. Some types of instruments may require considerably longer, particularly if their abnormal behavior requires reruns to check reliability. The customer who can spare the instrument for only a short time can usually arrange by letter or telephone call for shipping it to NIST just as the assigned starting date approaches. A notice will be sent acknowledging receipt of the customer's standard and/or purchase order. If both a confirmed purchase order (or equivalent) and the apparatus have been received, estimates of the completion date and the calibration fee will be sent upon request.
#### James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellant, v. C. W. VOLLMER & COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 14749.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 1954.

Sylvin S. Ellison, Washington, D. C., Earl Street, Regional Attys. Dept. of Labor, Dallas, Tex., Stuart Rothman, Sol., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Bessie Margolin, Chief of Appellate Lit., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Robert E. Leake, Jr., Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

We find ourselves in agreement with the views expressed by the learned district judge and approve his opinion reported in 113 F.Supp. 235 et seq. See also the later opinion of this Court in Van Klaveren v. Killian-House Co., 5 Cir., 210 F.2d 510, and Billeaudeau v. Temple Associates, Inc., Ms., decided June 5, Cir., 213 F.2d 707. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.
### **CHAPTERS 409 THROUGH 499—RESERVED**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(b)(3), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2836, added placeholder for chapters 409 to 499.