alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99(b)

Household Finance Corporation
Household Receivables Funding, Inc. III
Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2001-1


Original Class A Principal                    827,500,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                   827,500.00
Original Class B Principal                     72,500,000.00
Number of Class B Bonds (000's)                    72,500.00


Distribution Date                                                  2002 Totals

CLASS A
-------
Class A Principal Distributions                                             0.00
Class A Interest                                                   16,408,211.10


CLASS B
-------
Class B Principal Distributions                                             0.00
Class B Interest                                                    1,650,163.52
§ 890.1613 Contributions and withholdings. ( a ) *In general.* The calculations for contributions and withholdings for coverage under this subpart will be made in the same manner as 5 U.S.C. 8906 and subpart E of this part.
( b ) *Postal Service contribution.* The Government contribution with respect to the Postal Service for health benefits plans under this subpart shall be determined annually in accordance with § 890.501 commencing 2024 using the weighted average of rates offered by PSHB plans for the following year with respect to self only, self plus one, and self and family enrollments. For the initial contract year, the weighted average applicable for determining the Government contribution by the Postal Service will be determined using the calculation at 5 U.S.C. 8903c(i), except that OPM will use available data with respect to Postal Service enrollment for 2024, taking into account 2023 data.
( c ) *Medicare late enrollment penalty.* Upon request by the Postal Service, and only until the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund is depleted, OPM will pay out of the Fund any late enrollment penalties required under section 1839(e)(1) of the Social Security Act for individuals who enrolled during the special enrollment period established under section 1837(o) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395p).
( d ) *Calculations for the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund.* As directed by 5 U.S.C. 8909a OPM shall make annual computations with respect to the cost of claims attributable to Postal Service annuitants and their covered family members, and the United States Postal Service shall pay into the Fund annually according to those computations.
( e ) *Clarification of statutory terms.* OPM has determined that “future net claims costs” in the calculation in 5 U.S.C. 8909a(e)(1) is equivalent to “estimated net claims costs” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 8909a(g).
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-031 February 14, 2008 

NRC ANNOUNCES TRANSITION SCHEDULE 

FOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE MERGER 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a transition schedule for the 

planned merger of its Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste & Materials (ACNW&M) 

into the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), with the merger to be 

completed by the end of May. 

 The ACNW&M will continue to meet until that time in order to complete work 

already on its agenda. That work includes several letter reports to the Commission on 

issues related to the proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain; the health 

effects of low radiation doses; the NRC staff’s strategic assessment of low-level waste 

regulation; use of burn-up credit in transportation of spent nuclear fuel; and the 

recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection on 

collective dose estimates. The committee will also complete a white paper on the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and low-level waste disposal. 

 “With the committee’s work coming to an end, the time is right to use the 

members’ expertise in health physics and other specialties in areas where they will be in 

increasing demand – namely in licensing of new reactors and other nuclear facilities,” 

said Dr. Michael Ryan, chairman of the ACNW&M. 

 Once the ACNW&M completes its work in May, the committee’s members will 

be offered positions as consultants to the ACRS. The ACRS has a current vacancy, which 

it intends to fill with an expert in nuclear materials and radiation protection. That new 

member will serve as a subcommittee chairman in charge of issues formerly covered by 

the ACNW&M. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                      FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                 VW CREDIT, INC.

                      _____________________________________

            VOLKSWAGEN CREDIT AUTO MASTER OWNER TRUST, SERIES 2000-1

________________________________________________________________________________

          The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of VW Credit, Inc.
("VCI"), as Servicer, pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
of August 10, 2000 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"), by and among
Volkswagen Credit Auto Master Owner Trust, as Issuer, Volkswagen Dealer Finance,
LLC, as transferor, VCI, as Servicer, and Bank One, as Trustee, do hereby
certify that:

          1.   VCI is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.

          2.   The Undersigned is a Servicing Officer and is duly authorized
     pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
     Trustee, any Agent and any Enhancement Providers.

          3.   A Review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from
     the initial Closing Date through the calendar year ended December 31, 2002
     and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my
     supervision.

          4.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my
     knowledge, performed in all material respects all of its obligations under
     the Agreement throughout such period and no default in the performance of
     such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
     paragraph 5 below.

          5.   None.

          Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in
the Agreement.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this fifth day of March, 2003.


                                                  /s/ Dennis M. Tack
                                                  ------------------
                                           Name:  Dennis Tack

                                           Title: Controller
§ 890.1009 Contesting proposed mandatory debarments. ( a ) *Contesting the debarment.* Within 30 days after receiving OPM's notice of proposed mandatory debarment, a provider may submit information, documents, and written arguments in opposition to the proposed debarment. OPM's notice shall contain specific information about where and how to submit this material. If a timely contest is not filed, the proposed debarment shall become effective as stated in the notice, without further action by OPM.
( b ) *Requesting a reduction of the debarment period.* If OPM proposes a mandatory debarment for a period longer than the 3-year minimum required by 5 U.S.C. 8902a(g)(3), the provider may request a reduction of the debarment period to not less than 3 years, without contesting the debarment itself.
( c ) *Personal appearance before the debarring official.* In addition to providing written material, the provider may appear before the debarring official personally or through a representative to present oral arguments in support of his contest. OPM's notice shall contain specific information about arranging an in-person presentation.
NO. 07-00-00432-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	MAY __7, 2001

	______________________________

	RICHARD ALAN MARSCHNER,

			Appellant

	v.

	tThe HE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 122ND DISTRICT COURT OF GALVESTON COUNTY;

	NO. 99CR2110; HON. I. ALAN LERNER, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Richard Alan Marschner (appellant) appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated and contends, through his single point of error, that the evidence was legally

insufficient to uphold the jury’s verdict of guilty.  Nothing is said about the factual sufficiency

of the evidence.   We affirm.

Point One – Legal Sufficiency

	Standard of Review

	In considering the legal sufficiency of the evidence, the court views the relevant evidence, both circumstantial and direct, in the light most favorable to the verdict and determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the

crime beyond a reasonable doubt.  Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); King v. State, 29 S.W.3d 556, 562 (Tex.Crim.App.2000).   This, however, does not permit the court to sit as a thirteenth juror.  Moreno v. State, 755 S.W.2d 866, 867 (Tex.Crim.App.1988).  Rather, the reviewing court merely acts to

safeguard due process and to ensure the rationality of the fact-finder’s verdict.  Teer v. State, 923 S.W.2d 11, 17 (Tex.Crim.App.1996).

	Application of Standard

	According to appellant, the State failed to present legally sufficient evidence

establishing that his mental and physical faculties were impaired due to the ingestion of

alcohol.  That is, appellant does not argue that he was not intoxicated.  Rather, he believes

that the State failed to prove his intoxication was “due to the introduction of alcohol into [his] body.”  (Emphasis in original).  We disagree and overrule the point.  

	Appearing of record is evidence that appellant’s eyes were bloodshot and “droopy,”, his speech was slurred, and the inside of his automobile smelled of alcohol.  So too is there evidence that he failed the various sobriety tests given him by a police officer prior to 

arrest.  According to the officer, the failure to pass the tests indicated that appellant had

a “blood alcohol content” of .08 or more and that his mental and physical faculties were impaired.  (Emphasis added).   Finally, in speaking with the arresting officers, appellant

admitted that he had drank two or three glasses of wine (an alcoholic beverage).  Viewing

this evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, we hold that it constitutes some evidence upon which a fact-finder could rationally conclude, beyond reasonable doubt, that

appellant was intoxicated due to the ingestion of alcohol.

	Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s point of error and affirm the judgment.

								Brian Quinn

								    Justice

Do not publish.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the authority vested in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 319F-2 of Title III of the Public Health Service Act, as amended, to enter into agreements with recipients of the Stockpile material will be deployed. The authority to deploy the Stockpile referred to herein is limited to the CHEMPACK Program.

This authority cannot be redelegated. Further, CDC must notify the Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness before entering into an agreement.

This delegation became effective upon date of signature. In addition, I have affirmed and ratified any actions taken by the Director, CDC, or his/her subordinates which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated therein prior to the effective date of the delegation.

Dated: October 27, 2004.

Tommy G. Thompson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04-25002  Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
### §1943. Premiums

The premium rates for insurance shall be the net rates based upon the American Experience Table of Mortality and interest at 31⁄2 percent per annum. Regulations shall prescribe the time and method of payment of premiums, but payments of premiums in advance shall not be required for periods of more than one month each, and may be deducted from the pay or deposit of the insured or be otherwise made at the insured's election.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1158, §743; Pub. L. 97–295, §4(26), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1307; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(30), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3293; renumbered §1943, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 743 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the insured's" for "his".

1982—Pub. L. 97–295 substituted "percent" for "per centum".
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 0-30197


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of KIK Technology International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
M. Knooihuizen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2005                            By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      ------------                                ------------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of KIK Technology International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kuldip
C. Baid, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934;  and (2) the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2005                            By: /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
      ------------                                ------------------------------
                                                                  Kuldip C. Baid
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology International, Inc. and will furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





I,
      Thomas
      W. Martin, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of ICON Capital
      Corp., the Manager of the Registrant in connection with the Quarterly Report
      of
      ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the "LLC") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
      31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the "Quarterly Report") certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m); and





2.  The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      LLC.








*Dated:
      May 15, 2007*





*/s/
      Thomas W. Martin*


Thomas
      W.
      Martin


Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and President of the Manager


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### § 27.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 27.101(i) or exempted under § 27.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
No. II-09-057 October 16, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO CATAWBA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have selected Andy 

Hutto as the new senior resident inspector at Duke Energy’s Catawba 

nuclear power plant, located near York, S.C., about 18 miles south of 

Charlotte. 

Hutto joined the NRC in 1998 as a resident inspector at 

Progress Energy’s Robinson plant near Hartsville, S.C. He later 

served as a resident inspector and then senior resident inspector at 

Duke Energy’s Oconee Nuclear Station near Seneca, S.C. Before 

joining the agency, he worked for the U.S. Navy as a civilian nuclear 

shift test engineer at the Charleston Naval Shipyard. 

Hutto received a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry and a Master’s degree in 

Environmental Engineering from Clemson University. 

“Andy Hutto has the experience and commitment to safety to carry out the NRC mission 

of protecting people and the environment, and to help ensure the safe operation of the Catawba 

plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each U.S. commercial nuclear plant. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at 

one site for up to seven years. 

Hutto joins Resident Inspector Ron Cureton and Site Secretary Lee Harmon at the 

Catawba plant. The Catawba resident inspectors can be reached at 803-831-2963. 

 ### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Exhibit 10.68



 




Exhibit 10.68


ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY and

ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

Erie, Pennsylvania



AGGREGATE EXCESS OF LOSS REINSURANCE



ADDENDUM NO. 3



Amendment to the REINSURANCE CONTRACT made the first day of January, 1998,
between ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, by and through its Attorney-in-Fact, ERIE
INDEMNITY COMPANY, of Erie, Pennsylvania, (hereafter called the “REINSURER”),
and ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY and its wholly owned subsidiary ERIE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF NEW YORK, both of Erie, Pennsylvania (herein referred to
collectively (or individually as the context requires) as the “COMPANY”)


It is understood and agreed that, effective January 1, 2004, this Contract is
amended by the deletion of Article 12 and by substitution of the following
revised Article 12:


ARTICLE 12 – Premium



The premium for this reinsurance shall be 1.70% of the subject Net Premiums
earned by the COMPANY during any Annual Period this Reinsurance Contract
remains in force, and shall be subject to a minimum premium of $2,992,000 for
each Annual Period.


The COMPANY shall pay to the REINSURER a deposit premium of $3,366,000 for each
Annual Period which shall be payable in equal installments of $1,683,000 each
on the first days of January and July during the period this Reinsurance
Contract remains in force. Final adjustment of the premium for each Annual
Period hereunder shall be made as soon as may be reasonably practicable after
expiration of that Annual Period.


39






 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.


In Erie, Pennsylvania, this 28th day of January, 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY
	 	 	ATTEST:	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/
	Sheila Hirsch
	 	/s/
	Jan R. Van Gorder
	 	 	

	 	

	 	 	 	Sheila Hirsch
	 	 	Jan R. Van Gorder
	 	 	 	Executive Secretary
	 	 	Senior Executive Vice President
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Secretary & General Counsel
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY
	 	 	 	 	 	 	OF NEW YORK
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ATTEST:	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/
	Cori Coccarelli
	 	/s/
	Philip A. Garcia
	 	 	

	 	

	 	 	 	Cori Coccarelli
	 	 	Philip A. Garcia
	 	 	 	Executive Secretary
	 	 	Executive Vice President and
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, by
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY,
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Attorney-in-Fact
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ATTEST:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/
	Pamela D. Carullo
	 	/s/
	Michael S. Zavasky
	 	 	

	 	

	 	 	 	Pamela D. Carullo
	 	 	Michael S. Zavasky
	 	 	 	Administrative Assistant
	 	 	Senior Vice President




40
#### § 847.507 Earnings after transfer.

Amounts transferred to the Fund under § 847.502 that are used to determine the deficiency under § 847.604 accrue interest at the rate prescribed under § 841.603 of this chapter from the date of receipt in OPM through the date determined under § 847.603 (pertaining to the date of calculation of any deficiency).
###### Editorial Note on Part 15

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 15 appear at 62 FR 19669, Apr. 23, 1997.

#### § 15.22 Applicability and scope.

This subpart applies to Commissioned Officers of the NOAA Corps on active duty.