alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 732.102 Definition and applicability. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the term “national security position” includes: ( 1 ) Those positions that involve activities of the Government that are concerned with the protection of the nation from foreign aggression or espionage, including development of defense plans or policies, intelligence or counterintelligence activities, and related activities concerned with the preservation of the military strength of the United States; and
( 2 ) Positions that require regular use of, or access to, classified information. Procedures and guidance provided in OPM issuances apply.
( b ) The requirements of this part apply to competitive service positions, and to Senior Executive Service positions filled by career appointment, within the Executive Branch, and agencies may apply them to excepted service positions within the Executive Branch.
[56 FR 18654, Apr. 23, 1991, as amended at 66 FR 66711, Dec. 27, 2001]
§ 843.304 Commencing and terminating dates of survivor annuities. ( a ) A current or former spouse annuity under this subpart commences on the day after the death of the person on whose service the annuity is based.
( b ) A current or former spouse annuity under this subpart terminates on the last day of the month before the current or former spouse remarries before age 55 or dies.
( c ) A current spouse annuity under this subpart terminated for reasons other than death may be restored under § 843.305.
( d ) A survivor annuity accrues on a daily basis, one-thirtieth of the monthly rate constituting the daily rate. An annuity does not accrue for the 31st day of any month, except in the initial month if the survivor's (of a deceased employee) annuity commences on the 31st day. For accrual purposes, the last day of a 28-day month constitutes 3 days and the last day of a 29-day month constitutes 2 days.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 137158 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137158 

 COA: 277139 

Wayne CC: 06-012193-01

REGINALD LEE KIRKWOOD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 25, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANTS



|                                             |  |                                              
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name                                         |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Communications Midwest, LLC          |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Communications of Kentucky, L.P.     |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Kentucky Partners I, L.P.            |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P.           |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Kentucky Capital, LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|Coaxial Communications of Central Ohio, Inc. |  | Ohio                                         
|Insight Communications of Central Ohio, LLC  |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Phone of Indiana, LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Phone of Illinois, LLC               |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Phone of Kentucky, LLC               |  | Delaware                                     
|Insight Phone of Ohio, LLC                   |  | Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1967 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1967

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Allyl Pentaerythritol (APE).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

  Ms. Kaptur introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Allyl Pentaerythritol (APE).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLYL PENTAERYTHRITOL (APE).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.07.01    Allyl             Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     Pentaerythritol                                                         31/2006          ''
                     (CAS No. 1471-                                                                            .
                     18-7 or 91648-
                     24-7) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     9902.32.15)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 185.122 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and § 185.123, the term *documents* includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) Motions for discovery are to be handled according to the following procedures: ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within 10 days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 185.125.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he or she finds that the discovery sought: ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 185.125.
( e ) Depositions are to be handled in the following manner: ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 185.108.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ within 10 days of service a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
§ 919.50 How is this part written? ( a ) This part uses a “plain language” format to make it easier for the general public and business community to use. The section headings and text, often in the form of questions and answers, must be read together.
( b ) Pronouns used within this part, such as “I” and “you,” change from subpart to subpart depending on the audience being addressed. The pronoun “we” always is the OPM.
( c ) The “Covered Transactions” diagram in the appendix to this part shows the levels or “tiers” at which the OPM enforces an exclusion under this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10652]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “Monumental Journey: The Daguerreotypes of Girault de Prangey,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about January 29, 2019, until on or about May 12, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Marie Therese Porter Royce,

Assistant Secretary, for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2019-00012 Filed 1-8-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
§ 890.1203 Coverage. ( a ) An individual is covered under this subpart when the U.S. Department of State determines that the individual is eligible for coverage under section 599C of Public Law 101-513.
( b ) An individual who is covered under this subpart is covered under the Standard Option of the Service Benefit Plan. The individual has a self and family enrollment unless the U.S. Department of State determines that the individual is married and has no eligible children, or is unmarried and has one eligible child, in which case the individual is covered under a self plus one enrollment, or unless the U.S. Department of State determines that the individual is unmarried and has no eligible children, in which case the individual has a self only enrollment.
( c ) Individuals covered under this subpart are deemed ineligible for enrollment in any FEHB plan or option other than the Standard Option of the Service Benefit Plan.
( d ) Eligible surviving family members of an individual covered under this subpart whose hostage status ended because of death or who dies during the 60 months or 12 months following the end of hostage status are eligible to continue enrollment under this part. The enrollment terminates no later than 60 months or 12 months after hostage status ended.
( e ) An individual covered by this subpart is not considered an employee for the purpose of this part.
( f ) Eligibility for coverage under this subpart shall be subject to the availability of funds under section 599C(e) of Public Law 101-513.
[55 FR 50537, Dec. 7, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 43132, Sept. 18, 1992; 78 FR 64878, Oct. 30, 2013; 80 FR 55738, Sept. 17, 2015]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

** **

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I, Mark Gatto, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President of ICONCapital, LLC, the Manager of the Registrant, in connection with the QuarterlyReport of ICON Income Fund Ten, LLC (the “LLC”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       The Quarterly Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.       The information contained in the QuarterlyReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the LLC.

 

Date: November 5, 2013

 

/s/ Mark Gatto

Mark Gatto 

Co-Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Co-President

ICON Capital, LLC

 

 

----
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, June 1, 1998

----
#### Arnold Taubenslag, Doing Business under the Name of “Intercont” Intercontinental de Comercio, Respondent, v. Fabrikant Steel Products, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. There was insufficient basis for the sweeping examination of defendant’s books. The application too was premature since the use of the books and records on the examination before trial that has been directed may suffice plaintiff’s needs. Moreover, granting of the motion at this time circumvents the prior order at Special Term directing that the examination before trial of plaintiff should precede the examination before trial of defendant. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ.
# L_2023117EN.01000601.xml

| 4.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/6

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 280/2022

of 28 October 2022

amending Annex V (Free movement of workers) and Annex VIII (Right of establishment) to the EEA Agreement [2023/876]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 of 8 September 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1073 laying down technical specifications and rules for the implementation of the trust framework for the EU Digital COVID Certificate established by Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 of 8 September 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1073 laying down technical specifications and rules for the implementation of the trust framework for the EU Digital COVID Certificate established by Regulation (EU) 2021/953 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes V and VIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes V and VIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 10a (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1073) of Annex V to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32022 D 1516: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 of 8 September 2022 (OJ L 235, 12.9.2022, p. 61).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32022 D 1516: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 of 8 September 2022 (OJ L 235, 12.9.2022, p. 61).’

Article 2

The following indent is added in point 11a (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1073) of Annex VIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32022 D 1516: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 of 8 September 2022 (OJ L 235, 12.9.2022, p. 61).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32022 D 1516: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 of 8 September 2022 (OJ L 235, 12.9.2022, p. 61).’

Article 3

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1516 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 October 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 235, 12.9.2022, p. 61.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
### §3312. Educational assistance: duration

(a) In General.—Subject to section 3695 and except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), an individual entitled to educational assistance under this chapter is entitled to a number of months of educational assistance under section 3313 equal to 36 months.

(b) Continuing Receipt.—The receipt of educational assistance under section 3313 by an individual entitled to educational assistance under this chapter is subject to the provisions of section 3321(b)(2).

(c) Discontinuation of Education for Active Duty.—

(1) In general.—Any payment of educational assistance described in paragraph (2) shall not—

(A) be charged against any entitlement to educational assistance of the individual concerned under this chapter; or

(B) be counted against the aggregate period for which section 3695 limits the individual's receipt of educational assistance under this chapter.

(2) Description of payment of educational assistance.—Subject to paragraph (3), the payment of educational assistance described in this paragraph is the payment of such assistance to an individual for pursuit of a course or courses under this chapter if the Secretary finds that the individual—

(A)(i) in the case of an individual not serving on active duty, had to discontinue such course pursuit as a result of being called or ordered to serve on active duty under section 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 10; or

(ii) in the case of an individual serving on active duty, had to discontinue such course pursuit as a result of being ordered to a new duty location or assignment or to perform an increased amount of work; and

(B) failed to receive credit or lost training time toward completion of the individual's approved education, professional, or vocational objective as a result of having to discontinue, as described in subparagraph (A), the individual's course pursuit.

(3) Period for which payment not charged.—The period for which, by reason of this subsection, educational assistance is not charged against entitlement or counted toward the applicable aggregate period under section 3695 of this title shall not exceed the portion of the period of enrollment in the course or courses from which the individual failed to receive credit or with respect to which the individual lost training time, as determined under paragraph (2)(B).

(Added Pub. L. 110–252, title V, §5003(a)(1), June 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2362.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 1, 2009, see section 5003(d) of Pub. L. 110–252, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 16163 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
§ 231.203 Prohibition on certain joint research or technology licensing. (Technology Clawback) ( a ) During the applicable term of a Federal financial assistance award under 15 U.S.C. 4652, a covered entity may not knowingly engage in any joint research or technology licensing with a foreign entity of concern that relates to a technology or product that raises national security concerns.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, this prohibition will not apply to joint research or technology licensing that relate to technology or products that raise national security concerns that were ongoing prior to the Secretary's determination that such technology or products raised national security concerns. Any such ongoing joint research or technology licensing shall be memorialized in the required agreement.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Harold Earl Wilson v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas

formerly known as Banker's Trust Company, as Trustee and Custodian

for IXIS 2006

- HE2

Appellate case numb er: 01

- 12

- 00284

- CV

Trial court case number: 0771999A

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Appellee’s brief in this case is due on November 25, 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/ Harvey Brown

X Acti ng individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 5, 2013