alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023011EN.01002801.xml

| 12.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 262/2019

of 25 October 2019

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2023/85]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/784 of 14 May 2019 on harmonisation of the 24,25-27,5 GHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing wireless broadband electronic communications services in the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/784 of 14 May 2019 on harmonisation of the 24,25-27,5 GHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing wireless broadband electronic communications services in the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 5czo (Decision (EU) 2017/899 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘5czp. | 32019 D 0784: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/784 of 14 May 2019 on harmonisation of the 24,25-27,5 GHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing wireless broadband electronic communications services in the Union (OJ L 127, 16.5.2019, p. 13).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5czp.

32019 D 0784: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/784 of 14 May 2019 on harmonisation of the 24,25-27,5 GHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing wireless broadband electronic communications services in the Union (OJ L 127, 16.5.2019, p. 13).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/784 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 October 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 127, 16.5.2019, p. 13.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
                             THE UNITED STATES CODE

     The following certification accompanies the issuer's Annual Report on Form
10-K and is furnished, not filed, as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8238,
34-47986 dated June 5, 2003:

     I, Joseph B. Feil, Assistant Vice President of Wilmington Trust Company,
trustee of the MetLife Policyholder Trust (the "Trust"), certify that (i) the
Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Trust.

                                          By: /s/ Joseph B. Feil
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joseph B. Feil
                                            Assistant Vice President
                                            Wilmington Trust Company

Date: March 31, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the MetLife Policyholder Trust and will be retained by the
MetLife Policyholder Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                CFO CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the Annual Report of Rolltech, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
year  ended  December  31,  2002,  as  filed  with  the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Taly  Keren,  Principal
Accounting  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

(1)  the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                         /s/  Taly  Keren
                         Taly  Keren,  Principal  Accounting  Officer
                         March  28,  2003


<PAGE>
#### § 894.817 If I am a retiree who is a TEI-V and I return to active duty, what happens to my TEI family members' enrollment in their FEDVIP vision plan?

If you and your *TEI family members* are enrolled in a FEDVIP vision plan while you are retired, and you return to active duty, you will no longer be eligible to enroll in a FEDVIP vision plan and cannot continue to be the *enrollee* even though you are the *sponsor.* The current enrollment for you and your *TEI family members* will terminate and your coverage stops at the end of the pay period for which the premium payment was made from your uniformed services retirement pay. A *TEI certifying family member* may accept responsibility to self-certify as the *enrollee* by enrolling and, if appropriate, covering other *TEI family members.* You are responsible for notifying your covered *TEI family members* that your enrollment will terminate and of their opportunity to accept responsibility to self-certify as the *enrollee.* Once the *TEI certifying family member* enrolls, and covers your *TEI family members,* they can remain enrolled in a FEDVIP vision plan for the duration of your active duty service. *See* § 894.601.
### SUBCHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter I of this chapter consisting of sections 4101 to 4120, related to organization of Department of Medicine and Surgery, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §401(a)(3), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 210. See Prior Provisions notes set out under sections 4101 to 4110A of this title.
### §702k–2. Separability

If any provision of sections 642a, 702a–1, 702a–2 to 702a–12, 702g–1, 702j–1, 702j–2, and 702k–1 of this title, or the application thereof, to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the said sections, and the application of such provisions to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 548, §14, 49 Stat. 1513.)
#### § 892.301 How do I pay my premium?

As a participant in premium conversion, instead of having your premium withheld from after-tax salary, your salary will be reduced (through a Federal allotment) by the amount equal to your FEHB premium, which you will allot to your agency. The allotment from salary satisfies the FEHB premium payment requirement of 5 U.S.C. 8906. Your employer is authorized to accept this allotment under § 550.311(a)(7) and § 550.312 of this chapter or, for employers not subject to those regulations, a similar mechanism. Your agency will use the allotment to pay your share of your FEHB premium. This will reduce your taxable income as described in § 892.102.

[65 FR 44646, July 19, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 66828, Nov. 17, 2006]
```

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 773-774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00318]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4), 552b(c)(6), and 
552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and 
the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information

[[Page 774]]

concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; U01 RFA Panel: Tools and Technologies for the Analysis of 
Glycans.
    Date: February 13, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road NW, Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Raj K. Krishnaraju, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6190, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
435-1047, [email protected].

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00318 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
No. II-10-073 November 1, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

FOR FARLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have selected Jeffrey Sowa as the new 

resident inspector at Southern Company’s Farley nuclear power plant, located near Columbia, 

Ala., about 18 miles south of Dothan. 

Sowa joined the NRC in November 2008 as a project 

engineer in the Resident Inspector Development Program in the 

Region II office in Atlanta. Before joining the agency, he was a 

submarine officer in the U.S. Navy. 

Sowa received a Bachelor of Science degree from the U.S. 

Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., in 1998. He also holds a 

Master’s degree in Engineering Management from Old Dominion 

University and an MBA from California State University. 

“Jeff Sowa has the knowledge, training and experience to help ensure that the Farley 

plant is operated according to NRC regulations and in a way that protects people and the 

environment,” said NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes. 

At least two NRC resident inspectors are assigned to each U.S. commercial nuclear plant. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can serve at 

one site for up to seven years. 

Sowa joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Eddy Crowe and Site Secretary Amy Barrett 

at the Farley plant. The Farley resident inspectors can be reached at 334-899-3386. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
No. IV-11-023

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519

 May 12, 2011 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

FOR DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting in San Luis Obispo, 

Calif., on June 15, to discuss the agency’s 2010 performance assessment for the Diablo Canyon 

nuclear power plant. The plant, located near San Luis Obispo, is operated by Pacific Gas & 

Electric Co.

The meeting will be held from 6 to 9 p.m. at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna 

Road, in San Luis Obispo. In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be 

available to answer questions and hear comments from the public on issues related to Diablo 

Canyon.

“Each year, the NRC assesses the performance of all of the nation’s commercial nuclear 

power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. “The meeting provides us an 

opportunity to discuss our annual assessment of the plant with the company, local officials and 

the public. We look forward to answering any questions they may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2010 and will serve as the basis for the meeting. It is available on the NRC 

website at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/diab_2010q4.pdf.

The NRC said Diablo Canyon operated safely during 2010 and will receive the detailed 

inspection regime during 2011 used by the NRC for plants in this category. Inspections are 

performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists 

from the Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. 

The letter says PG&E has made progress in addressing human performance issues 

regarding the use of conservative assumptions in decision making. However, progress needs to 

be made in addressing issues involving problem identification and resolution because inspections 

continue to identify findings associated with this theme. NRC plans to conduct focused 

inspections to monitor the licensee’s progress in addressing this issue.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov
Current performance information for Diablo Canyon Unit 1 is available on the NRC 

website at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DIAB1/diab1_chart.html. 

Information for Unit 2 is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DIAB2/diab2_chart.html.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s website.
#### Denver Piatt, Appellant, v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Defendant, and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Respondent.

Memorandum: Plaintiff’s action being based upon the alleged negligence of the employer railroad, its officers and employees, assumption of risk is not available as a defense (U. S. Code, tit. 45, § 54, as amd. in 1939) and should be stricken from appellant’s answer. Contributory negligence, while not a bar to recovery, goes to mitigation of damages. The fact that it may be proved under a general denial which puts in issue not only the defendant’s negligence but also the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence, does not, we feel, require that it be stricken in the absence of a showing that plaintiff would be prejudiced. No such showing is made. All concur. (Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out portions of the answer of defendant railroad company.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
§ 9801.102 CIGIE organization. ( a ) *Centralized program.* CIGIE has a centralized Privacy Act program, with one office receiving and coordinating the processing of all Privacy Act requests to CIGIE.
( b ) *Acceptance of requests and appeals.* CIGIE will accept initial requests or appeals regarding CIGIE records.
[82 FR 51333, Nov. 6, 2017]
### §230309. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account; and

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its national convention and board of administration.

(b) Inspection.—A member, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1485.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230309 | 36:774. | July 18, 1958, Pub. L. 85–530, §14, 72 Stat. 374. |

Section

In this section, the word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
#### § 2006.2 Adequacy of the petition.

If the petition filed pursuant to section 302 does not conform substantially to the requirements of §§ 2006.0 and 2006.1, the Chairman of the Section 301 Committee may decline to docket the petition as filed and, if requested by petitioner, return it to petitioner with guidance on making the petition conform to the requirements, or may nevertheless determine that there is sufficient information on which to proceed to a determination whether to initiate an investigation.
NRC UPDATES AGING MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT FOR REVIEWING 

REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL REQUESTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the second revision of its Generic Aging 

Lessons Learned (GALL) Report, a key document in the agency’s process for reviewing 

applications to renew reactor operating licenses.

The report’s revisions stem from lessons learned since the first revision in 2005. Updates 

were made to all of the existing aging management programs. Several new aging management 

programs were added to the GALL Report, for example a new program covering buried pipes 

and tanks.

The GALL Report catalogs the structures and components found in a nuclear power 

plant. NRC reviewers use the report’s matrix of materials and environments, as well as aging 

effects and mechanisms, to judge whether a plant’s aging management program is acceptable. 

The NRC staff asked for public input during the revision process, and considered these 

comments in the final report. As part of this process, the NRC also revised the Standard Review 

Plan it uses for license renewal applications based on the GALL report revisions and lessons 

learned during previous license renewals.

The revised GALL Report is available online from the NRC’s electronic document 

database, ADAMS. It can be retrieved by entering ML103490041, in the ADAMS search engine 

at this Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. For more 

information on the schedule and background on guidance visit the NRC website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/guidance/updated-guidance.html. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-218 December 16, 2010
#### § 0.735-50 Judicial review.

Any former employee found to have violated 18 U.S.C. 207, or regulations issued thereunder, by a final administrative decision under this subpart may seek judicial review of the administrative determination.
§ 231.102 Foreign country of concern. The term *foreign country of concern* means: ( a ) A country that is a covered nation (as defined in 10 U.S.C. 4872(d)); and
( b ) Any country that the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and the Director of National Intelligence, determines to be engaged in conduct that is detrimental to the national security or foreign policy of the United States.
Exhibit 10.7
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO
CREDIT AGREEMENT
 WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC. BOOKHAM, INC., Parent Borrower Borrowers
    DEFINED TERMS .
 AMENDMENT .
 Section 2.12(a)(ii)
  Schedule 1.1
 Eligible Accounts provided however
 Schedule 1.1
 Eligible Alcatel Italia Accounts Alcatel Italia




---



##### 



REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
 NO DEFAULTS . Borrowers hereby affirms to the Lender Group that no Event of Default
has occurred and is continuing as of the date hereof.
 CONDITION PRECEDENT
 COSTS AND EXPENSES
 LIMITED EFFECT
 COUNTERPARTS; EFFECTIVENESS
   WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,
a California corporationBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



BOOKHAM, INC.,
a Delaware corporation, as ParentBy:Name:
    Steve AbelyTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerBOOKHAM TECHNOLOGY PLC,
a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of
England and Wales, as a BorrowerBy:Name:
    Steve AbelyTitle:
    DirectorNEW FOCUS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation, as a BorrowerBy:Name:
    Steve AbelyTitle:
    PresidentBOOKHAM (US), INC.,
a Delaware corporation, as a BorrowerBy:Name:
    Steve AbelyTitle:
    President
### SUBCHAPTER VII—OTHER PROVISIONS
GEORGIAN BANKING SECTOR MATURING

----

**November 1997**
By Bob Ross
Three years ago it would have been extremely risky to do business with a Georgian bank. Turmoiland conflict in Georgia following independence had a strong effect on the country's banks.  Accounting records were haphazard and banks were illiquid and lacked equity.  After the localcurrency, the coupon failed, Georgia's banks took refuge in the U.S. dollar.  When the IMF andNational Bank of Georgia (NBG -- Georgia's central bank) took measures to reduce the supplyof coupons and stem inflation in 1994, the subsequent exchange rate move (from 4.2 millioncoupons per dollar to 1.3 million coupons per dollar) resulted in heavy exchange losses for thebanks.  In addition, lax regulation and licensing led to the proliferation of small private banks,many demanding outrageous rates of interest for dollar deposits and disappearing shortlythereafter.  However, there are signs of a much healthier banking sector now.  Despite theweaknesses described above, balance sheets, though small, are now robust and some larger bankshave received unconditional audit opinions.  U.S. companies doing business in Georgia can nowgive stronger consideration to the possibility of doing business with a Georgian bank.  
**The Situation Today**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERRANCE WILSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 131 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.