alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Brian John, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Teeka Tan Products, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of IHealth, Inc.

November 16, 2006                      By: /s/ Brian John
                                           --------------
                                       Brian John, CEO,
                                       principal executive officer and
                                       principal accounting officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2115. Acquisition, operation, and maintenance of Lafayette Escadrille Memorial

The American Battle Monuments Commission may enter into an agreement with the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial Foundation to acquire, operate, and maintain the Lafayette Escadrille Memorial in Marnes-la-Coquette, France. Under such an agreement, the Commission shall make necessary arrangements to ensure the ongoing maintenance of the memorial, including the cemetery at the memorial that contains the remains of 49 aviators of the United States who died during World War I.

(Added Pub. L. 114–227, §1(a), Sept. 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 934.)
NRC PROVIDES IMPROVED ACCESS TO PUBLIC DOCUMENTS 

IN ADAMS THROUGH ITS WEBSITE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has put in place enhancements to allow members of 

the public easier and quicker access to all public documents in its Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System (ADAMS) through the NRC website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. ADAMS is the official recordkeeping system, 

through which the NRC provides access to all of the agency’s publicly available documents. 

The new interface is transparent, versatile and no longer requires downloading or 

installing special software to reach any publicly-available document in ADAMS. Searches for 

documents in ADAMS can be made through one link and newly released documents will now be 

available in ADAMS on the same day that they are published, eliminating the 1-day delay that 

had been the standard in the previous system. Users will still be able to view document images, 

download files, create reports, and print documents locally.

The new web-based ADAMS allows users to search the full text of publicly available 

documents published in electronic form, and provides expanded access to over 2.5 million NRC 

documents including those stored on microfiche or in paper form. A User Guide and Frequently 

Asked Questions, available on the ADAMS website, provide more detailed information on how 

to find, retrieve and print publicly available documents.

Additional improvements to ADAMS are planned as the agency continues to develop 

better content management systems, as reported in NUREG-1954, “Enterprise Content 

Management: Streamlining How Staff and Stakeholders Work within the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission’s Regulatory Environment.” 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web 

address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at 

www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when 

news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-189 October 20, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Genes, Genomes, and Genetics Integrated Review Group; Therapeutic Approaches to Genetic Diseases Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         February 7-8, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Methode Bacanamwo, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-827-7088,                         *methode.bacanamwo@nih.gov*.                    

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 23, 2019.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00236 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 68 FR 51355, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 20.16 Hearings, decisions, post-termination proceedings.

Certain DOC procedural provisions applicable to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to DOC enforcement of these regulations. They are found in 15 CFR Part 8, § 8.12 and § 8.13.
§ 843.209 Waiver of notification requirement. The current and/or former spouse notification requirement will be waived upon a showing that the current and/or former spouse's whereabouts cannot be determined. A request for waiver on this basis must be accompanied by— ( a ) A judicial or administrative determination that the current and/or former spouse's whereabouts cannot be determined; or
( b ) Affidavits by the former employee and two other persons, at least one of whom is not related to the former employee, attesting to the inability to locate the current and/or former spouse and stating the efforts made to locate the current and/or former spouse.
No. II-10-082 December 3, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO AREVA RICHLAND FACILITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to AREVA NP, 

Inc., which operates a nuclear fuel processing facility in Richland, Wash. Under the terms of the 

order, the company has agreed to a series of corrective actions related to an employee falsifying 

transportation forms for an overseas shipment of low-enriched uranium. 

The order is the result of an agreement reached under the NRC’s Alternative Dispute 

Resolution process, which was requested by AREVA to address the violation associated with the 

improper shipment forms. ADR is a process using a neutral mediator with no decision-making 

authority to assist the parties in reaching an agreement. 

In 2009, the NRC’s Office of Investigations substantiated that an AREVA employee 

deliberately falsified United Kingdom Department for Transportation transit approval forms for 

overseas shipments of low-enriched uranium. In addition, the NRC investigation found that the 

employee also failed to follow the procedure for calculations associated with the shipments. 

A mediation session with AREVA was held on Oct. 5 and a settlement was reached. The 

Confirmatory Order, issued Thursday, outlines a number of actions AREVA has agreed to take. 

As part of the order, AREVA is required to document corrective actions and enhancements 

already completed or in progress, and to conduct a review within the next year to determine the 

effectiveness of those actions. The company also must conduct an independent safety culture 

assessment at its facilities, and develop additional corrective actions based on the assessment. 

The company took disciplinary action against the employee involved in the incident and 

that employee is no longer employed at AREVA, Inc.

Copies of the Confirmatory Order will be posted on the NRC web site at 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions. 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

LEONA COSBY, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

V. ) 

) 

PEOPLE'S CANCEL OF THE COURT, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

JUN- 7 2012 

Clerk, U.S. District & B 

Courts for the Oist . ankruptcy net ot Columbia 

12 0926 

This matter comes before the court on review of the plaintiffs application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the 

complaint. 

The Court has reviewed the plaintiffs complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by 

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted 

by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even prose litigants, however, 

must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 

(D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint 

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a 

short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand 

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum 

standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendant of the claim being asserted, sufficient to 

prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine 

of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

1 
In its entirety, the complaint states: 

The people in this area have been doing things to me that are not 

good standard hitting me in the face and head, taking things from 

me, money, clothes, [harassing] just about even night. I was unable 

to go in to there [sic] stores with my cart. I was told not to come 

back in the store. Some is in the room behind the bathroom taking 

picture wild [sic] using the bathroom. I was also cut my body. 

Compl. Plaintiff demands "one Trillion" dollars. !d. What few factual allegations the plaintiff 

includes in her pleading are far too vague to establish an entitlement to the monetary damages she 

demands. As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a), and it will be dismissed. 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately. 

United States District Judge 

DATE: 

2
7590-01-P 

Notice of Availability of Memorandum of Understanding between 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on 

Environmental Reviews Related to the Issuance of Authorizations to Construct and Operate 

Nuclear Power Plants

SUMMARY: On September 12, 2008, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which 

establishes a framework for early coordination and participation among the agencies. The MOU 

is an effort to facilitate the timely review of proposed nuclear power plant applications and it 

establishes a commitment to early agency involvement; proactive participation and informal 

communication throughout the review process; sharing of information gathered, considered and 

relied upon by each agency; and, if requested, interagency participation in public hearings. 

Interagency cooperation under the MOU will facilitate each agency’s compliance with its review 

responsibilities under the National Environmental Policy Act and other related statutes with 

respect to the authorizations required to construct and operate nuclear power plants licensed by 

the NRC. It is anticipated that the Corps will act as a cooperating agency in most 

circumstances; however, the MOU does not preclude different forms of coordination (e.g., Corps 

participation as a consulting agency). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Emch, Environmental Technical Support 

Branch, Division of Site and Environmental Reviews, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD 20854, 301-415-1590, or Paul Michalak, Environmental 

Projects Branch 2, Division of Site and Environmental Reviews, Office of New Reactors, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD 20854, 301-415-7612. The MOU between the 
- 2 - 

NRC and the Corps is entitled “Memorandum of Understanding between U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Environmental Reviews Related to the 

Issuance of Authorizations to Construct and Operate Nuclear Power Plants” and is attached to 

this notice. The MOU was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) of the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and by the Executive Director for Operations for the U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission on September 12, 2008. 

 Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of September, 2008. 

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 /RA/ 

Scott C. Flanders, Director 

Division of Site and Environmental Reviews 

Office of New Reactors
Board Coverage Decision

2010-44.13

Union Depot Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4350
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE RUSSIAN BANKING SECTOR

----

OCTOBER 1998
AUTHOR:   MARINA PARSHUKOVA
INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1998.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES
Summary.  This report provides information on recent developments in the banking sector inRussia.  While the financial crisis unfolds, and more banks are facing bankruptcy, the Russiangovernment is deciding upon steps to save the banking system from a total collapse.  Governmentand expert agencies have provided updated ratings of banks, according to which the prospects forbanks' future activity and effectiveness can be judged.  Certain information has been providedfrom local publications and Interfax International News Agency.  End summary. 
We would appreciate your feedback on this report.  Please share your comments and suggestionswith us:
US & Foreign Commercial Service Moscow
U.S. Depanment of

Transponation

Office of the Secretary

Of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

May 8,2014

Mr. Ted Vallas

President

Carlsbad-Palomar Airlines, Inc.

d/b/a California Pacific Airlines

5670 EI Camino Real, Suite D

Carlsbad, CA 92008

Rr Docket DOT-OST-201O-0l26, Application of

Carlsbad-Palomar Airlines, Inc. d/b/a California

P~cific Airlines for a certificate of public

cdnvenience and necessity

Dear Mr. Vallas:

This letter responds to your request 0 behalf of Carlsbad-Palomar Airlines, Inc. d/b/a

California Pacific Airlines ("CP Air"), for a waiver from the dormancy provisions of

section 204.7 of our rules (14 CFR § 204.7), to enable the company to fulfill the

conditions in Order 2011-8-3 issued Aurt 25, 2011, to make its authority effective.

In support of its request, CP Air provided updated information in support of its fitness

and states that it is continuing to work ,.ith the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA")

to obtain the required safety authority fo' its proposed operations.

As you know, the Department does ot generally grant waivers from the dormancy

provisions of section 204.7 unless the company at issue shows good cause for such

action. Based on our review of the mformation CP Air submitted in support of an

extension, it appears that the company remains fit to conduct operations as aU. S.

certificated air carrier. Moreover, ti}e FAA has informed us that while resource

constraints of that agency resulted in the recent termination of CP Air's FAA

certification, CP Air's certification rekains on the Phoenix Certificate Management

Office's waiting list as the top priority. I Therefore, we conclude that there is good cause

to grant the company an additional sik months, that is, until November 8, 2014, to

commence actual flight operations.

Any additional requests for a waiver 10m section 204.7 of our rules must be received

45-days before the expiration of CP "!'Iir's authority and be accompanied by adequate

information evidencing that CP Air still meets the Department's fitness criteria and that it

has completed nearly all of the steps 0 commence operations (i.e., has the necessary

personnel, financial resources, aircraft, and FAA operating authority). Furthermore, any
2

such waiver request should be mailed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket

Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E., West Building

Ground Floor, Washington, D.C. 2059 , or electronically filed at www.regulations.gov.

In either case, the waiver request ShO~ld be accompanied by proof of payment of the

$280 application fee, which may be pai i at www.pay.gov.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Damon Walker of my

staff on (202) 366-7785.

Sincerely,

Laura yn J. Remo

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0126

Keith Ballenger

Assistant Manager

Federal Aviation Administration

Western-Pacific Flight Standards Di ision
---

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rainer Rotthaeuser, the Chief Executive Officer of
Exploration Drilling International Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/
      Rainer Rotthaeuser         
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| | Name:  | RAINER ROTTHAEUSER                   
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| | Date:  | November 14, 2006                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### Art Color Printing Company, Appellant, v. Kable News Company, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1






STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.


OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Issuer”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2012as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray Jefferd, President, and Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated  March 21, 2012




/s/ Ray Jefferd


Ray Jefferd


President and Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 0.735-10a-0.735-15 [Reserved]