alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4345

___________

Harvey Hudspeth, Jr.; Estate of Staci *

K. Hudspeth; Estate of Matthew Shane *

Hudspeth, a minor, by Harvey Hudspeth, *

his father, natural guardian and next *

friend, *

* Appeal from the United States

Appellants, * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

v. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

City of Sherwood, Arkansas; *

Leonard Carver, III, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: September 15, 2000

Filed: November 13, 2000

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a June 1, 1995, altercation with a Sherwood, Arkansas, police officer, Staci

K. Hudspeth was charged with the misdemeanor offenses of third degree battery and

obstructing a governmental operation. During the criminal proceedings, her attorney

agreed, on Hudspeth’s behalf, that Hudspeth would forego a civil suit against the police
1The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

officer or the city in exchange for the termination of the proceedings. The city

dismissed the charges, and shortly thereafter Hudspeth died of brain cancer. Some

three years later, Hudspeth’s estate and survivors brought a civil action against the

police officer and the city and now appeal from the district court’s1 grant of summary

judgment in favor of the defendants based on the court’s conclusion that a valid releasedismissal agreement barred the civil suit. See, e.g., Woods v. Rhodes, 994 F.2d 494,

502 (8th Cir. 1993). Having considered the record and the parties’ submissions, we are

satisfied that the court reached the correct result and conclude that a detailed opinion

would have no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §30711. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1324.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30711 | 36:511. | July 19, 1954, ch. 536, §11, 68 Stat. 491. |

Section
No. II-10-060 September 3, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC PROPOSES $140,000 FINE AGAINST NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed that Nuclear Fuel Services 

be fined $140,000 for violations of NRC regulations stemming from an October 2009 event 

related to the control of nuclear material at the company's Erwin, Tenn., nuclear fuel facility. 

In a letter to the company, NRC Regional Administrator Luis Reyes said an NRC 

inspection team and subsequent NRC review found the Oct. 13 event that resulted in an 

unexpected increase in the rate of a chemical reaction and an evacuation of employees from the 

affected area “occurred because multiple barriers at NFS failed.” 

“These failures were primarily attributable to a lack of management oversight...a lack of 

a questioning attitude, perceived production pressure and poor communication,” Reyes said. 

The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or to 

protest its imposition. 

An NRC Augmented Inspection Team was sent to NFS after the October 2009 event and 

the NRC subsequently determined that five violations of agency requirements occurred. At a July 

13, 2010 enforcement conference, NFS acknowledged that the violations occurred, but argued 

that they did not warrant escalated enforcement action. 

 The NRC proposed the large civil penalty based on recent enforcement history at NFS as 

well as the company’s poor performance. The violations, Reyes wrote, “clearly demonstrate 

continuing poor performance” in management oversight, the process for making changes to 

systems and the facility’s safety culture. NRC officials were also concerned that NFS had 

decided to restart the affected process lines without fully understanding the cause of the October 

event and correcting the underlying problems. That concern led to NFS voluntarily halting 

production of all process lines in December and the NRC issuing a confirmatory action letter. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §5703. Certification of records of District of Columbia

When a copy of any public record of the District of Columbia is required by the Secretary to be used in determining the eligibility of any person for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary, the official custodian of such public record shall without charge provide the applicant for such benefits or any person (including any veterans' organization) acting on the veteran's behalf or the authorized representative of the Secretary with a certified copy of such record.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1237, §3303; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(78), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3298; renumbered §5703, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(1), (2)(A)(xiii), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3303 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83 substituted "Secretary" for "Veterans' Administration" in two places and "administered by the Secretary" for "administered by the Veterans' Administration".

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the veteran's" for "his".
#### David Robbins, Respondent, v. Maurice Simmons, Appellant.

Present — Townley, Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 217—THE AMERICAN LEGION**

Sec.
21701.
Organization.
21702.
Purposes.
21703.
Membership.
21704.
Powers.
21704A.
Nondiscrimination.
21705.
Exclusive right to name, emblems, and badges.
21706.
Political activities.
21707.
Service of process.
21708.
Annual report.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–35, §4(b), July 30, 2019, 133 Stat. 1047, added item 21704A.
### §200313. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be distributed as provided by the council of administration, but in compliance with the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1455.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200313 | 36:549. | Aug. 20, 1954, ch. 774, §19, 68 Stat. 752. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "as provided by" are substituted for "in accordance with the determination of" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "and all Federal and States laws applicable thereto" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin R. Griffith, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IDI Global, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

                                   /s/ Kevin R. Griffith
Date: March 29, 2004              ____________________________________
                                  Kevin R. Griffith
                                  Chief Executive Officer
### §3318. Additional assistance: relocation or travel assistance for individual relocating or traveling significant distance for pursuit of a program of education

(a) Additional Assistance.—Each individual described in subsection (b) shall be paid additional assistance under this section in the amount of $500.

(b) Covered Individuals.—An individual described in this subsection is any individual entitled to educational assistance under this chapter—

(1) who resides in a county (or similar entity utilized by the Bureau of the Census) with less than seven persons per square mile, according to the most recent decennial Census; and

(2) who—

(A) physically relocates a distance of at least 500 miles in order to pursue a program of education for which the individual utilizes educational assistance under this chapter; or

(B) travels by air to physically attend an institution of higher learning for pursuit of such a program of education because the individual cannot travel to such institution by automobile or other established form of transportation due to an absence of road or other infrastructure.

(c) Proof of Residence.—For purposes of subsection (b)(1), an individual may demonstrate the individual's place of residence utilizing any of the following:

(1) DD Form 214, Certification of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

(2) The most recent Federal income tax return.

(3) Such other evidence as the Secretary shall prescribe for purposes of this section.

(d) Single Payment of Assistance.—An individual is entitled to only one payment of additional assistance under this section.

(e) No Charge Against Entitlement.—Any amount paid an individual under this section is in addition to any other educational assistance benefits provided the individual under this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 110–252, title V, §5003(a)(1), June 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2369; amended Pub. L. 111–275, title X, §1001(g)(6), Oct. 13, 2010, 124 Stat. 2896.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b)(2)(B). Pub. L. 111–275 substituted "higher learning" for "higher education".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 1, 2009, see section 5003(d) of Pub. L. 110–252, set out as an Effective Date of 2008 Amendment note under section 16163 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
# L_2023073EN.01003801.xml

| 10.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/38

---

DECISION No 2020/2 OF THE REGIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE TRANSPORT COMMUNITY

(Following a consultation of the Regional Steering committee members)

on the Director of the Permanent Secretariat of the Transport Community [2023/554]

THE REGIONAL STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE TRANSPORT COMMUNITY,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Transport Community, and in particular Article 24(1) and Article 30 thereof,

Having regard to the Decision 2019/2 of the Regional Steering Committee of 28 January 2019,

Having regard to the Decision 2019/3 of the Regional Steering Committee of 5 June 2019 on the Rules on the Recruitment, Working conditions and Geographic equilibrium of the staff of the Permanent Secretariat of Transport Community,

Having regard to the agreed conclusions of the Regional Steering Committee meeting of 18 May 2020 and the subsequent consultation of the Ministerial Council as well as the conclusions of the 8th Regional Steering Committee meeting of 30 June;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Matej Zakonjsek is appointed as Director of the Permanent Secretariat.

Article 2

The place of assignment is the seat of the Permanent Secretariat of the Transport Community, Masarikova 5, 11000 Belgrade (Serbia).

Article 3

This appointment is concluded for a period of 36 months, from the date of entry into force of this decision and may be renewed for maximum two times.

Article 4

This Decision shall come into effect on: 1 August 2020.

Done in, Sarajevo, on 6 July 2020.

For the Regional Steering Committee

The President

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2152 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2152

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend for an additional 
         5 years the special immigrant religious worker program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT RELIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM.

    Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ``2003,'' each place 
it appears and inserting ``2008,''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect on October 1, 
2003.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
NRC, CENG MANAGERS TO DISCUSS COMPANY’S FLEET OF

NUCLEAR PLANTS AT PUBLIC MEETING ON JULY 26

Managers from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Constellation Energy Nuclear 

Group (CENG), LLC, will conduct a public meeting on Tuesday, July 26, to discuss the 

company’s three nuclear power plants. Those facilities are Calvert Cliffs, in Lusby, Md.; Ginna, 

in Ontario, N.Y.; and Nine Mile Point, in Scriba, N.Y.

The session will provide NRC senior managers responsible for oversight of the plants 

with an opportunity to discuss them simultaneously – providing a perspective on fleetwide 

activities and initiatives -- with the company’s senior management. Such meetings are routinely 

held on an annual basis.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. at CENG’s headquarters, located at 100 

Constellation Way in Baltimore, Md. It will take place in the Candler Building’s second-floor 

main conference room. Portions of the meeting may be closed due to discussions of securityrelated information. 

Members of the public are invited to observe the meeting. Those in attendance will be 

able to ask questions or offer comments to NRC officials after the business portion has been 

concluded but before the overall session has been adjourned. The meeting notice is available on 

the agency’s website.

Information about the NRC’s assessment of performance at the respective plants is 

available on the agency’s website by clicking Calvert Cliffs 1, Calvert Cliffs 2, Ginna, 

Nine Mile Point 1, or Nine Mile Point 2. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. I-11-026

Contact: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330

 Neil Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

July 20, 2011

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30403 (Summary Calendar)

ADVANCED MATERIALS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WILLIAM H. REED; E. A. BURGESS; GARY BAZZELL; PHILLIP RODGERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 96-CV-771-I)

- - - - - - - - - - January 14, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Advanced Materials, Inc. (“AMI”) appeals the dismissal of its

claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The individual

defendants were employee auditors for the Defense C ontract Audit

Agency (“DCAA ”), which performed the auditing and accounting

functions regarding a research and development contract between AMI

and the Department of Defense. Based on DCAA’s analysis, the2

Department of Defen se disallowed the reimbursement of contract

costs to AMI.

AMI alleges that the individual defendants were negligent in

auditing and analyzing AMI’s contract and committed various acts as

of libel or slander disparaging AMI. AMI has filed these claims

under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b),

2671-80. The FTCA acts as a waiver of the United States’ sovereign

immunity from suit. However, the FTCA explicitly excludes any

claims “arising out of

. . . libel, slander,

. . . or interference

with contract rights.

. . .” 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h). Although AMI

has framed its claims in terms of negligence, the claims regarding

contract anal ysis and auditing are clearly based in contract and

cannot be considered tort claims for purposes of the FTCA. S ee

Davis v. United States , 961 F.2d 53, 56 (5th Cir. 1991). As none

of AMI’s claims fall within the FTC A’s waiver of sovereign

immunity, the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to

consider them and properly dismissed the suit. S ee Truman v.

United States , 26 F.3d 592, 594 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
### §1929. Authority to adjust premium discount rates

(a) Notwithstanding sections 1902, 1923, and 1925 of this title and subject to subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary may from time to time adjust the discount rates for premiums paid in advance on National Service Life Insurance, Veterans' Special Life Insurance, and Veterans Reopened Insurance.

(b)(1) In adjusting a discount rate pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary may not set such rate at a rate lower than the rate authorized for the program of insurance involved under section 1902, 1923, or 1925 of this title.

(2) The Secretary may make an adjustment under subsection (a) of this section only if the Secretary determines that the adjustment is administratively and actuarially sound for the program of insurance involved.

(Added Pub. L. 100–687, div. B, title XIV, §1401(b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4129, §729; renumbered §1929 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 729 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1902, 1923, and 1925" for "702, 723, and 725" in subsec. (a) and "1902, 1923, or 1925" for "702, 723, or 725" in subsec. (b)(1).

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 100–687, div. B, title XIV, §1401(b)(2), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4129, provided that: "The amendment made by paragraph (1) [enacting this section] shall take effect with respect to premiums paid after the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 18, 1988]."