alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 340

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2328

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22 (legislative day, JULY 21), 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2001 East Willard Street in Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 2001 East Willard Street in Philadelphia, Penn6 sylvania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert 

7 A. Borski Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2328 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 340

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2328

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2001 East Willard Street in 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert A. Borski Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
#### § 231.301 Procedures for notifying the Secretary of significant transactions.

During the 10-year period beginning on the date of the Federal financial assistance award under 15 U.S.C. 4652, the covered entity shall submit a notification to the Secretary regarding any planned significant transactions of the covered entity or members of the affiliated group that may involve the material expansion of semiconductor manufacturing capacity in a foreign country of concern, regardless of whether the covered entity believes the transaction falls within an exception in 15 U.S.C. 4652(a)(6)(C)(ii). A notification must include the information set forth in § 231.302 and be submitted to *notifications@chips.gov.*
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25324]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-129771-04]
RIN 1545-BD49


Guidance Under Section 951 for Determining Pro Rata Share; 
Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations 
under section 951(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) that provide 
guidance for determining a United States shareholder's pro rata share 
of a controlled foreign corporation's (CFC's) subpart F income, 
previously excluded subpart F income withdrawn from investment in less 
developed countries, previously excluded subpart F income withdrawn 
from foreign base company shipping operations, and amounts determined 
under section 956.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for November 18, 2004, 
at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sonya M. Cruse of the Publications and 
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel 
(Procedures and Administration), at (202) 622-4693 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and notice 
of public hearing that appeared in Federal Register on Friday, August 
6, 2004, (69 FR 47822), announced that a public hearing was scheduled 
for November 18, 2004, at 10 a.m., in the IRS Auditorium, Internal 
Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 951(a) of the 
Internal Revenue Code.
    The public comment period for these regulations expired on November 
4, 2004. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public 
hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public 
hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be 
addressed. As of Tuesday, November 9, 2004, no one has requested to 
speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for November 18, 2004, 
is cancelled.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing 
Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedures and Administration).
[FR Doc. 04-25324 Filed 11-9-04; 3:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Claudette Massaro, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Louis Massaro, et al., Appellants, v. Vincent Pacifico, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
NRC WELCOMES TEAM OF INTERNATIONAL REGULATORS 

FOR 2-WEEK VISIT 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is hosting an international group of 19 senior 

nuclear regulators as part of the Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS), an International 

Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) program that assesses a country’s regulatory infrastructure 

against international safety standards and good practices. The NRC’s IRRS mission will focus on 

technical and policy issues regarding the agency’s oversight of operating U.S. nuclear power 

plants. 

 “We look forward to demonstrating the NRC’s strong commitment to nuclear safety and 

sharing our approach with our international counterparts,” said NRC Chairman Gregory B. 

Jaczko. “We asked the IAEA for this IRRS mission. When the team’s report is complete our 

senior managers will review the team’s conclusions and determine what actions the NRC should 

take.” 

 Jukka Laaksonen, Director General of Finland’s Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, 

will lead the IRRS team during its visit from Oct. 18-29; his deputy is Kunihisa Soda, Senior 

Advisor at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency. The remainder of the team is comprised of senior 

members of nuclear safety agencies in North America, Europe and Asia. The team will be 

accompanied by three observers. 

As the host regulator, the NRC has spent approximately two years preparing for the IRRS 

visit, including assembling a detailed self-assessment of 12 subject areas covering U.S. nuclear 

reactor safety regulations and their relationship to IAEA safety standards. The IRRS mission 

team will provide an independent peer review of the self-assessment by interviewing NRC staff, 

examining documents and observing inspection activities. The team will draft a report outlining 

its observations and recommendations at the conclusion of the visit, and the report’s final version 

will be made public in a few months. 

 The IAEA has conducted IRRS missions in several countries, including Romania, the 

United Kingdom, France, Australia, Japan, Mexico and Canada. The NRC’s IRRS efforts are 

outlined on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/conference-symposia/irrsNRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-180 October 8, 2010
mission-review.html . More information on the IRRS program is available on the IAEA web site 

at: http://www-ns.iaea.org/reviews/rs-reviews.htm . 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 831.906 Requests from individuals. ( a ) An employee who requests credit for service under 5 U.S.C. 8336(c) bears the burden of proof with respect to that service, and must provide the employing agency with all pertinent information regarding duties performed, including— ( 1 ) For law enforcement officers, a list of the provisions of Federal criminal law the incumbent is responsible for enforcing and arrests made; and
( 2 ) For firefighters, number of fires fought, names of fires fought, dates of fires, and position occupied while on firefighting duty.
( b ) An employee who is currently serving in a position that has not been approved as a primary or secondary position, but who believes that his or her service is creditable as service in a primary or secondary position may request the agency head to determine whether or not the employee's service should be credited and, if it qualifies, whether it should be a primary or secondary position.
( c ) A current or former employee (or the survivor of a former employee) who believes that a period of past service in an unapproved position qualifies as service in a primary or secondary position and meets the conditions for credit must follow the procedure in paragraph (b) of this section. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the request must be made to the agency where the claimed service was performed.
( d ) For a current or former employee seeking credit under 5 U.S.C. 8336(c) for service performed at an agency that is no longer in existence, and for which there is no successor agency, OPM will accept, directly from the current or former employee (or the survivor of a former employee), a request for a determination as to whether a period of past service qualifies as service in a primary or secondary position and meets the conditions for credit.
( e ) Coverage in a position or credit for past service will not be granted for a period greater than 1 year prior to the date that the request from an individual is received under paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this section by the employing agency, the agency where past service was performed, or OPM.
( f ) An agency head, in the case of a request filed under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, or OPM, in the case of request filed under paragraph (d) of this section, may extend the time limit for filing when, in the judgment of such agency head or OPM, the individual shows that he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from making the request within the time limit.
V

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2279

For the relief of Mohammed Manir Hossain, Ferdous Ara Manir, and Maish

Samiha Manir.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Mohammed Manir Hossain, Ferdous Ara

Manir, and Maish Samiha Manir.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MOHAM4 MED MANIR HOSSAIN, FERDOUS ARA MANIR,

5 AND MAISH SAMIHA MANIR.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

8 Act, Mohammed Manir Hossain, Ferdous Ara Manir, and

9 Maish Samiha Manir shall each be eligible for issuance

10 of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that
2

•HR 2279 IH

1 of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence

2 upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant

3 visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of

4 status to lawful permanent resident.

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Mohammed Manir

6 Hossain, Ferdous Ara Manir, or Maish Samiha Manir en7 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified

8 in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have

9 entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligi10 ble, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245

11 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of

12 the enactment of this Act.

13 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap15 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica16 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

17 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

18 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

19 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res20 idence to Mohammed Manir Hossain, Ferdous Ara Manir,

21 and Maish Samiha Manir, the Secretary of State shall in22 struct the proper officer to reduce by 3, during the current

23 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi24 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun25 try of the aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immi-
3

•HR 2279 IH

1 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total

2 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na3 tives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section

4 202(e) of such Act.

5 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

6 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural

7 parents, brothers, and sisters of Mohammed Manir

8 Hossain, Ferdous Ara Manir, and Maish Samiha Manir

9 shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any

10 right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Na11 tionality Act.

Æ
NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE 

WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS NOV. 19 IN ROCKVILLE, MD 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a predecisional enforcement 

conference in Rockville, Md., on Nov. 19, with representatives of Entergy Operations to discuss 

apparent violations of NRC regulations regarding decommissioning funding assurance for the 

River Bend plant in Louisiana. 

The conference will begin at 8 a.m. in room O16B4 of the NRC’s One White Flint North 

building at 11555 Rockville Pike in Rockville. During the conference, the licensee will have an 

opportunity to address the apparent violations identified by the NRC during the agency’s review 

of nuclear power plant decommissioning funds. The NRC determined Entergy’s 

decommissioning funding plan for River Bend failed to provide adequate assurance the company 

would have sufficient resources to cover the estimated costs of cleaning up the River Bend site 

after the reactor permanently shuts down. 

The public is invited to observe the meeting. NRC officials will be available before the 

conclusion of the meeting to answer questions. A teleconference will be available; please contact 

Anneliese Simmons at 301-415-2791 or anneliese.simmons@nrc.gov by Nov. 18 for the call-in 

information. 

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that a 

determination has been made that violations have occurred or that enforcement action will be 

taken. The purpose is to discuss the apparent violations, causes and safety significance, to 

provide the licensee with an opportunity to point out any errors, if any, in the NRC inspection 

report and to enable the company to outline its corrective actions. 

No decision on the apparent violations or any contemplated enforcement action, such as a 

civil penalty, will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a 

later time. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-198 November 3, 2010
Code of Ethics



 EXHIBIT 10(a)(1) 
  
 Code of Ethics for Persons Acting in Capacity of 
 CEO and Financial Executives of 
 Allstate Assurance Company Separate Account B 
  
 In my role as Chairman of the Board of Managers of Allstate Assurance Company Separate
Account B (the “Separate Account”) acting as the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, or certain of the Chief Financial Officer’s direct reports, I certify that I will seek to adhere to the following principles and
responsibilities, which are in addition to any other applicable requirements set forth in Allstate Assurance Company Separate Account B Code of Ethics applicable to every director, officer, general partner, Portfolio Manager, or Advisory Person of
the Separate Account, and Adviser or any other Separate Account policy statements as amended from time to time: 
  

	1.	Acting ethically and with honesty in my work on behalf of the Separate Account and avoiding conflicts of interest in my personal and professional relationships, and expecting
those that work with and for me to do likewise. 

  

	2.	Disclosing information that is full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable in all SEC filings and public communications. 

  

	3.	Complying with applicable laws, rules, and regulations of the countries, states, local governments, agencies, and stock exchanges that regulate the business of the Separate
Account. 

  

	4.	Promptly reporting violations of this Code of Ethics, or any other applicable Separate Account policy statements, to the Office of Business Practices and Ethics or any other
appropriate Separate Account officer, auditor, director or regulator.  

  

	5.	Assuming personal accountability for adherence to this Code of Ethics, and understanding that I am subject to disciplinary action, up to and possibly including termination, for
failure to do so. 

  
 I understand that I may choose to remain
anonymous in reporting any violation of this Code of Ethics and that any questions regarding this Code of Ethics should be directed to the Office of Business Practices and Ethics. I understand that any waivers of this Code of Ethics can only be made
by the Separate Account’s Board of Managers and must be reported by the Separate Account to the SEC. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	  


		
	 Name:
	 	 
		
	 Date:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Unico, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I Mark A. Lopez, Chief Executive Officer of Unico, Incorporated (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, was adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: June 11, 2009

*/s/ Mark A. Lopez*

Mark A. Lopez

Chief Executive Officer

 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
B.C.D. 03-57

JUN 2 5 2003

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Short Line Services, Inc.

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of Short 

Line Services, Inc. (SLS), as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 231 et seg.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.l.

Information regarding SLS was provided by H. Devone Shaw, Steptoe & Johnson, counsel

for SLS. SLS was incorporated March 8,2002. Mr. Shaw advised that SLS is to begin

doing business upon issuance of a ruling by the Board. Pursuant to a contract with Big

Eagle Rail, LLC, a covered employer under the Acts (B.A. No. 2414), SLS will operate a 

short line railroad transporting approximately 700,000 tons of coal per month from the

point of mining to the loading facilities along a six mile track. That operation is currently

being performed by Appalachian Railcar Services (B.A. No. 9410), a covered employer

under the Acts to the extent it performs services for Big Eagle, and an affiliate of SLS.

Appalachian Railcar Services1 will transfer the two employees who perform services for

Big Eagle Rail to SLS when SLS begins operations. SLS will also maintain and repair coal

cars belonging to Big Eagle.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 33920, Big Eagle filed a verified

notice of exemption to lease and operate a rail line which interchanges with CSX

Transportation. Big Eagle began operations August 20, 2000, and was held to be an

employer by the Board as ofthat date.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.-§ 231(a)(1)), insofar as relevant

here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Surface

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49, United States

Code;

Sections i(a) and i(b) ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition, as does section 3231 ofthe

Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

The evidence of record establishes that SLS will conduct railroad operations over the rail

line of Big Eagle, which is subject to STB jurisdiction and is a carrier employer under the

RRA and the RUIA. Because SLS will be conducting rail operations over Big Eagle’s rail

1 The Board’s Audit and Compliance Section will review Appalachian Railcar Services with a view to 

determining whether its coverage under the Acts should be terminated.

BA#2415
-2-

Short Line Services, Inc.

line, it is determined that SLS will become an employer within the meaning ofsection

i(a)(i)(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 23i(a)(i)(i)) and the corresponding

provision ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective the date ofthis

decision2.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

2 The Board does not ordinarily issue coverage decisions prior to the beginning date of operations.

However, in this case it appears that SLS is depending on the Board’s decision in order to begin operations.