alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





ENABLE
HOLDINGS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1.  
   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enable Holdings, Inc. for the
quarter ended May 15, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  
   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Enable
Holdings, Inc.





Date:
      May 15, 2009
              /s/
      Jeffrey D. HoffmanBy:
      Jeffrey D. HoffmanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
### §1985. Decisions by the Secretary

Except in the event of suit as provided in section 1984 of this title, or other appropriate court proceedings, all decisions rendered by the Secretary under the provisions of this chapter shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law or fact, and no other official of the United States shall have jurisdiction to review any such decisions.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1167, §785; renumbered §1985 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 785 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1984" for "784".

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in section catchline and in text.
<PAGE>

                             EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.
                                600 Third Avenue
                                   33rd Floor
                            New York, New York 10016



                                                            February 23, 2004



Chardan China Acquisition Corp.
777 South Highway 101
Suite 215
Solana Beach, CA 92075

Dr. Richard D. Propper
Jiangnan Huang
Kerry Propper
Li Zhang
Dan Beharry
Steven Urbach
Anthony D. Errico Jr.
Michael Urbach


Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to each of your respective letter agreements with
EarlyBirdCapital, Inc. and Chardan China Acquisition Corp., dated January 5,
2004. The undersigned hereby waives its rights under Section 7 or Section 8 (as
the case may be) of each of your letter agreements relating to your restrictions
on being involved with future "Acquisition Funds." Except as indicated above,
each of the letter agreements shall remain in full force and effect.




                                                  EARLYBIRDCAPITAL, INC.



                                              By: /s/ David M. Nussbaum
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Name:  David M. Nussbaum
                                                  Title: Chairman
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, John McLeod, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of California Oil & Gas Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas Corporation for the six month period ended May 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of California Oil & Gas Corporation.

Dated July 24, 2006.

/s/ John McLeod                                  

John McLeod

President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

D/ljm/851220.1
### §5122. Cancellation of checks mailed to deceased payees

A check received by a payee in payment of accrued benefits shall, if the payee died on or after the last day of the period covered by the check, be returned to the issuing office and canceled, unless negotiated by the payee or the duly appointed representative of the payee's estate. The amount represented by such check, or any amount recovered by reason of improper negotiation of any such check, shall be payable in the manner provided in section 5121 of this title, without regard to section 5121(c) of this title. Any amount not paid in the manner provided in section 5121 of this title shall be paid to the estate of the deceased payee unless the estate will escheat.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1229, §3022; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(67), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3296; renumbered §5122 and amended Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), (d)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238, 239; Pub. L. 104–316, title II, §202(t), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–316 in last sentence struck out "upon settlement by the General Accounting Office" after "shall be paid".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 3022 of this title as this section and substituted "5121" for "3021" in two places and "5121(c)" for "3021(c)".

1986—Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "the payee's" for "his" in first sentence.
| a. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kuhlman Company, Inc. for the                quarter                ended October 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b. | information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Kuhlman Company,                Inc.                                                                                    |

|                                 |                                           |                                   |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                           |
| Date:              December 22, 2006 |                                           | /s/ Charles              Walensky |
|                                 | By                Charles Walensky             |
|                                 | Interim Chief                Financial Officer |

----
§ 9801.304 Response to appeal of adverse determination on amendment; disagreement statements. ( a ) *Response timing.* The Chairperson should make a final determination in writing not later than 30 days from the date the appeal was received. The 30-day period may be extended for good cause. Notice of the extension and the reasons therefor will be sent to the requester within the 30-day period.
( b ) *Amendment granted.* If the Chairperson determines that the record(s) should be amended in accordance with the requester's request, the Chairperson will take the necessary steps to advise the requester and to direct the appropriate system manager: ( 1 ) To amend the record(s); and
( 2 ) To notify previous recipients of the record(s) for which there is an accounting of disclosure that the record(s) have been amended.
( c ) *Denial affirmed.* If the appeal decision does not grant in full the request for amendment, the decision letter will notify the requester that the requester may: ( 1 ) Obtain judicial review of the decision in accordance with the terms of the Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C. 552a(g); and
( 2 ) File a statement setting forth their reasons for disagreeing with the decision.
( d ) *Requester's disagreement statement.* A requester's disagreement statement must be concise. CIGIE has the authority to determine the “conciseness” of the statement, taking into account the scope of the disagreement and the complexity of the issues.
( e ) *Provision of requester's disagreement statement.* In any disclosure of information about which an individual has filed a proper statement of disagreement, CIGIE will clearly note any disputed portion(s) of the record(s) and will provide a copy of the statement to persons or other agencies to whom the disputed record or records has been disclosed and for whom an accounting of disclosure has been maintained. A concise statement of the reasons for not making the amendments requested may also be provided.
#### § 18.21 Decision.

The adjudicative officer shall issue an initial decision on the application within 30 calendar days after completion of proceedings on the application. The initial decision of the adjudicative officer shall include written findings and conclusions on the applicant's eligibility and status as a prevailing party, and an explanation of the reasons for any difference between the amount requested and the amount awarded. The decision shall also include, if at issue, findings on whether the Department's position was substantially justified, whether the applicant unduly protracted the proceedings, or whether special circumstances make an award unjust. If the applicant has sought an award against more than one agency, the decision shall allocate responsibility for payment of any award made among the agencies, and shall explain the reasons for the allocation made.

[47 FR 13510, Mar. 31, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 6799, Mar. 3, 1988]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Child Psychopathology and Developmental Disabilities.                    

*Date:*                         January 31, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jane A. Doussard-Roosevelt, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3184, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-4445,                         *doussarj@csr.nih.gov.*

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2019.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00173 Filed 1-25-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# L_2017008EN.01001501.xml

| 12.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/15

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 185/2015

of 10 July 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/25]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/547 of 1 April 2015 on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for alcohol-powered flueless fireplaces pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/547 of 1 April 2015 on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for alcohol-powered flueless fireplaces pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 3s (Commission Decision 2013/121/EU) of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘3t. | 32015 D 0547: Commission Decision (EU) 2015/547 of 1 April 2015 on the safety requirements to be met by European standards for alcohol-powered flueless fireplaces pursuant to Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety (OJ L 90, 2.4.2015, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘3t.

Article 2

The text of Decision (EU) 2015/547 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 July 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 90, 2.4.2015, p. 14.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 10.3

MINUTES OF A SPECIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 

OF

DICUT INC.

(the **"Corporation"**)

A special meeting of the board of directors of the Corporation was held at 2150 Northwest Parkway SE, Suite H. Marietta, Georgia on March 14, 2002 at 9:30 am.

Directors present were:

Pierre Quilliam (by telephone)

Raj Kalra

Being all the directors of the Corporation.

The purpose of the meeting was to address this issue of the entitlement of Raj Kalra and Pierre Quilliam to be issued cashless Stock Purchase Warrants by the Company in consideration of bringing forth potential corporate acquisitions for the Company which are ultimately completed.

BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1.  The Corporation is hereby authorized to enter into a Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement with each of Raj Kalra and Pierre Quilliam upon the successful completion of each acquisition of the Company which originated from Mr. Kalra and/or Mr. Quilliam.  The value of the Stock Purchase Warrants for each of Mr. Kalra and Mr. Quilliam shall be equal to fifty percent (50%) of the value of the consideration paid for each such acquisition.

The undersigned, being all of the Directors of the Corporation, hereby consent to the foregoing resolutions.

DATED at Marietta, Georgia this 14th day of March, 2002

/s/ Pierre Quilliam

-------------------------------------

PIERRE QUILLIAM

/s/ Raj Kalra

-------------------------------------

RAJ KALRA
Section 1350 Certification

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


      In connection with the quarterly report of Pioneer Financial Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 13, 2004
                                       By:
                                          -------------------------
                                          Randall J. Opliger
                                          Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-60319

_____________________________________

RAY B. HILL, ET AL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

AND KELLEN KNIGHT; FLORA KNIGHT; M D COATS, SR; LAURA MARIE COATS; JEFFREY MARK COATS, Plaintiffs,
VERSUS CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,
VERSUS WILLIE KILGORE, an Individual, and WAYNE POULTRY DIVISION OF CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

----------------------------------------

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS RAY B. HILL; JUDY HILL, Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:95cv191GS)

______________________________________________________ February 6, 1996* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
2 Before KING, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellants complain of orders of the district court declining
to remand plaintiffs' case to the state court and the order dismissin g plaintiffs' suit. After reviewing the record in this

case and considering the parties' briefs, we find neither error nor abuse of discretion by the district court. The district court's judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
#### § 875.401 How do I apply for coverage?

To apply for coverage, you must complete the application in a form appropriate for your eligibility status as prescribed by the Carrier and approved by OPM.

[87 FR 68598, Nov. 16, 2022]
Un ited Sta tes

Go v ern m en t

MEMORANDUM

FORM G-115f (1-92)

Ra ilroa d Re tir em en t B oard

August 4,2010 

L-2010-04.1

To: V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Labor Member

From: Steven A. Bartholoyy> ,

General CounseL^y^0^

Subject: Clarification of Legal Opinion L-2010-04

I have been advised that questions have been raised concerning the advice provided in Legal 

Opinion L-2010-04 with respect to the creditability of pay for time lost in court issued 

judgments. Legal Opinion L-2010-04 addressed a situation where a judgment issued by a court 

in a FELA case allocated the pay for time lost both retroactively, and prospectively. Future 

damages included pay for time lost, medical expenses, and other damages without specific 

allocation between pay for time lost and other damages; accordingly, under the RRA the entire 

amount of the future damages was considered to be pay for time lost. The opinion advised that, 

inasmuch as there was no restriction as to the period to which the judgment was to be 

apportioned, the entire amount would be considered as creditable so long as the employee 

retained an employment relationship, by allocating the maximum creditable monthly amount to . 

the period prior to the judgment and for the number of months thereafter until the judgment 

amount has been exhausted.

My understanding is that questions have been raised suggesting that Legal Opinion L-2010-04 

means that there is no way of restricting the period after the judgment to which pay for time lost 

is creditable. Compensation may not be credited to any month after an employee has 

relinquished his or her employment relationship. Accordingly, even if there is no period of time 

to which pay for time lost is to be allocated specified in the judgment, the employee can restrict 

the creditability of pay for time lost by relinquishing his employment rights with the employer. 

After the date on which the employee’s employment rights are relinquished, no further 

compensation may be creditable. In addition, the judgment could make a specific allocation of 

damages for pay for time lost and for other damages.