alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REGIONAL CORNER: OMSK OBLAST, RUSSIA

----

**June 1998**
**by Michael Trainor**
The Omsk Oblast in Central Siberia covers nearly 140,000 square kilometers and has six majorcities with populations exceeding 100,000.  The largest of these is the regional capital, Omsk,whose 1.2 million inhabitants represents 55 percent of the region's 2.2 million people.  Omsk,bordered by Kazakhstan to the south, is one of the most important regions in Central Siberia.
**Industry**
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Noble Innovations, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Cole, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

James Cole

President and Principal Financial Officer

|   | August 20, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------|

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Friede & Goldman, LLC f/k/a FGL Buyer, LLC d/b/a 

Friede & Goldman, Ltd.

Appellate case number: 01-18-00409-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-29340

Trial court: 125th District Court of Harris County

Relator, Friede & Goldman, LLC f/k/a FGL Buyer, LLC d/b/a Friede & Goldman, 

Ltd., has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in this Court. Relator also has filed a 

“Motion for Emergency Order Staying Trial Court Discovery.” The motion is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 21, 2018
### [§§3723 to 3725. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–368, title VI, §602(a)(1), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3345]

Section 3723, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1214, §1823; Pub. L. 86–73, §4, June 30, 1959, 73 Stat. 156; Pub. L. 86–665, §4, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 87–84, §3, July 6, 1961, 75 Stat. 202; Pub. L. 88–274, Feb. 29, 1964, 78 Stat. 147; Pub. L. 88–560, title VII, §701(e)(2), Sept. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 94–324, §§6, 7(27), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 721, 722; Pub. L. 97–295, §4(68), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1310; Pub. L. 97–452, §2(e)(2), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2479; Pub. L. 99–576, title IV, §405, Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3281; Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §313(b)(1), (8), (9), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2077, 2078; renumbered §3723 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, related to direct loan revolving fund. See section 3722 of this title.

Section 3724, added Pub. L. 86–665, §7(a), July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 532, §1824; amended Pub. L. 94–324, §7(28), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 722; Pub. L. 97–72, title III, §303(j), Nov. 3, 1981, 95 Stat. 1060; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title V, §2511(b), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1117; Pub. L. 99–322, §2(a), May 23, 1986, 100 Stat. 494; Pub. L. 100–689, title III, §303, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4177; Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §§302(a)(2), (3)(A), (c), 313(b)(1), (2), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2070, 2071, 2077; renumbered §3724 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406, related to Loan Guaranty Revolving Fund. See section 3722 of this title.

Section 3725, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1215, §1824; renumbered §1825, Pub. L. 86–665, §7(a), July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 532; amended Pub. L. 94–324, §7(29), June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 722; Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §302(a)(1), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2069; Pub. L. 102–54, §15(a)(2), June 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 289; renumbered §3725 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406; Pub. L. 102–547, §2(b)(2), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3634, related to Guaranty and Indemnity Fund. See section 3722 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1998, see section 602(f) of Pub. L. 105–368, set out as an Effective Date of 1998 Amendment note under section 2106 of this title.
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

FOR M G-11SI (1-M)

M e m o r a n d u m

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t b o a r d

L -95-31-

OCT 311995

TO Kenneth J. Zoll

Director of Retirement Benefits

FROM Steven A. Bartho

Deputy General C

Through: Catherine C. Cook ^ ( f

General Counsel

SUBJECT The 1989 Pension Plan for Employees of CN U.S.

Subsidiaries (As Renamed, Amended and Restated

January 1, 1989)

This is in response to your memorandum of September 22, 1995,

requesting my opinion as to whether the above-referenced pension

plan is a supplemental pension plan within the meaning of section

2(h)(2) of the Railroad Retirement Act. The plan covers Grand

Trunk Western RR Co. (BA 1208), Duluth, Winnepeg and Pacific

Railway Co. (BA 1607), Minnesota & Manitoba RR (BA 1111), and CNNew England (BA 1113) , all of which are active U.S. subsidiaries of

the Canadian National Railway (BA 1103). Grand Trunk Western RR

Co. and Duluth, Winnepeg and Pacific Railway Co. are currently in

the Supplemental Annuity Tax Credit/Tax Liability (TACAL) program.

The Minnesota & Manitoba RR and the CN-New England need to be added

to TACAL.

The pension plan is a defined benefit plan with definite provisions

concerning participation, contributions, creditable service,

vesting, retirement age, and benefits. The plan is currently

funded from the trust fund; prior to January 1, 1979, there were

employee contributions. The plan has been approved by the Internal

Revenue Service.

Section 216.42(a) of the Board's regulations defines a supplemental

pension plan as follows:

(a) What is a private railroad pension. * * * A private

pension for purposes of this subpart is a plan that:

(1) Is a written plan or arrangement which is

communicated to the employees to whom it applies;

(2) Is established and maintained by an employer for

a defined group of employees; and
Kenneth J. Zoll

Director of Retirement Benefits

2

(3) Provides for the payment of definitely

determinable benefits to employees over a period of

years, usually for life, after retirement or disability.

Such a plan is sometimes referred to as a defined benefit

plan.

It is my opinion that the plan is question meets the requirements

of section 216.42(a) and, thus, is a supplemental plan under

section 2(h)(2). Benefits under the plan will reduce the

supplemental annuity to the extent benefits are based upon employer

contributions.
Report to NSIAC 

January, 2011
Overall Implementation Statu
Overall Implementation Statu

 All plants have met the first and second mile No deviations to the Initiative have been rep All plants report that they are on schedule fo

milestones except one utility (3 plants) 

– Inspection start is at risk pending publication 

d t th t id id i ti documen

t th

a

t provides guidance on inspecti

planning 

 One utility reported that inspections of all of 

systems” was complete in July, but not compJanuary 

– Utility discovered additional contaminated pip

the July 2010 report
Operating Experience

 Reported in EP

early January

 Significant leak

– Exceed NRC o

limits, 

– Reportable und

Ground water PGround water P

Initiative, 

– Result in a sys

component beiservice

 Adverse inspec

findings require within one cycle

 Too early to tre
Operating Experience

The majority of leaks are inconsequentialSignificant leaks amount to about 7 to 15% of total 

Number of these leaks was approximately the same in 2009 and 2010 

•Historically, approximately 12% of leaks occur in s

y y stems that are safet

y related or 

contain licensed material

•May be biased by data prior to 2009 when the leaks that were most likely to be reported were significant ones

The three major reported failure causes were mechanical processes, equipment aging, and erosion/corrosion
NDE Technology

 Buried pipe NDE reference guide issued last August 

1021626)

– Describes various in-line and outside pipe NDE techno

 Inspection methods and delivery tools are available; 

vendors

– Have limited resources, – Are in demand at other industries Are in demand at other industries, 

– Have limited experience in the nuclear industry.

 Challenges:

– Developing appropriate implementation methods– Documenting technological capabilities and processes– Aggressive inspection schedules– Field demonstration of technologies 

 Buried Piping Industry Group (BPIG) working on issu
Overall Observations

 Implementing Underground Piping and Tanks In

scheduled

 Keep focus and funding on inspection tool deve Importance of the “reasonable assurance docum Communicate ins

pection schedules to allow res

planning 

– Communication will occur through BPIG.

 Holding a Underground Piping and Tanks Integr

Ground Water Protection Initiative coordination w

– September 2011– Enhanced Inspection and Environmental Monitoring In
<PAGE>
                               EXHIBIT (11)

                            CMI CORPORATION
             STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                            September 30       September 30
                                         ------------------  -----------------                                        
                                              1996     1995       1996    1995
                                              ----     ----       ----    ----

<S>                                        <C>       <C>        <C>     <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income per statements of operations    $ 2,333      878      6,212  18,054

Deduct dividends on preferred stock        $   151      133        272     315

Deduct accretion of preferred stock
 discount                                  $     -        2          -       7
                                            ------   ------     ------  ------
Net Income Available to Common Stock       $ 2,182      743      5,940 $17,732
                                            ======   ======     ======  ======
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                20,468   20,376     20,413  20,362

Add dilutive effect of outstanding
 stock options (as determined using
 the treasury stock method)                    204      549        344     561
                                            ------   ------     ------  ------
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding, as adjusted                   20,672   20,925     20,757  20,923
                                            ======   ======     ======  ======
Primary earnings per share                 $   .11      .04        .29     .85
                                            ======   ======     ======  ======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net income applicable to common stock
 as shown in primary computation above     $ 2,182      743      5,940  17,732
                                            ------   ------     ------  ------
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                20,468   20,376     20,413  20,362

Add fully dilutive effect of
 outstanding stock options (as
 determined using the treasury stock
 method)                                       204      549        344     561
                                            ------   ------     ------  ------
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding, as adjusted                   20,672   20,925     20,757  20,923
                                            ======   ======     ======  ======
Fully diluted earnings per share           $   .11      .04        .29     .85
                                            ======   ======     ======  ======
</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 9—MISCELLANEOUS**

Sec.
901.
Service flag and service lapel button.
902.
National League of Families POW/MIA flag.
903.
Designation of Medal of Honor Flag.
904.
Hostage and Wrongful Detainee flag.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVIII, §1804(a)(2)(B), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 687, added item 904.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–248, title VIII, §8143(b)(2), Oct. 23, 2002, 116 Stat. 1570, added item 903.
§ 919.940 Disqualified. *Disqualified* means that a person is prohibited from participating in specified Federal procurement or nonprocurement transactions as required under a statute, Executive order (other than Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) or other authority. Examples of disqualifications include persons prohibited under— ( a ) The Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276(a));
( b ) The equal employment opportunity acts and Executive orders; or
( c ) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7606), Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368) and Executive Order 11738 (3 CFR, 1973 Comp., p. 799).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of BAS Consulting, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, B. Alva Schoomer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ B. Alva Schoomer

B. Alva Schoomer

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2005
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# ROP Annual Performance Metric Report for CY 2010.

Accession Number: ML110740073

Date Released: Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML110740045 - Reactor Oversight Process Annual Performance Metric Report For Calendar Year 2010. (3 page(s), 4/13/2011)
    - ML110740064 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment Metrics. (57 page(s), 4/13/2011)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Order entered Febr uary 26 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01308
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 01309
- CR GERARDO DELACRUZ, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F13
- 21654
- R ,F12
- 22418
- R 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal s . On January 23, 2015, we ordered the tri al court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s record had not been filed. On February 25, 2015, we received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the January 23, 2015 order requiring findings. Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
NRC SEEKING ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING COMMENTS REGARDING 

TURKEY POINT NEW REACTOR APPLICATION, MEETING JULY 15 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold public meetings Thursday, July 15, in 

Homestead, Fla., to discuss the agency’s review of a Combined License (COL) application for two 

new reactors proposed for the Turkey Point site near Homestead, and the environmental issues the 

agency should consider in reviewing the application. 

The NRC staff will meet with the public from 1 – 4 p.m. and 7 – 10 p.m. at the Homestead 

YMCA, 1034 Northeast 8th St. in Homestead. The NRC will transcribe the meeting and post the 

information on the agency’s Web page for the Turkey Point application at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/turkey-point.html. NRC staff will be available for 

informal discussions with members of the public during “open house” sessions from noon – 1 p.m. 

and 6 – 7 p.m. No formal comments on the environmental review will be accepted during the open 

house sessions. 

Florida Power & Light submitted the COL application June 30, 2009, seeking approval to 

build and operate two AP1000 reactors at the site, approximately 40 miles south of Miami. The 

application’s environmental report is available on the agency’s website at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/turkey-point.html. 

 Those wishing to register in advance to present their comments at the meeting should 

contact Andrew Kugler or Tomeka Terry by telephone at 800-368-5642, x2828 and x1148 

respectively, or via e-mail at TurkeyPoint.COLEIS@nrc.gov by July 12. Those with special needs 

for attending or presenting information at the meeting should notify the staff by July 7. Those 

wishing to speak may also register at the meeting no later than 12:45 p.m. and 6:45 p.m. 

Individual comments could be limited by the time available and the number of people wishing to 

speak. 

NRC staff will also consider written comments on the scoping issues associated with the 

Turkey Point application. Comments should be submitted no later than Aug. 16, either by mail to 

Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Division of 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-106 June 16, 2010
Administrative Services, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001., or via e- mail at 

TurkeyPoint.COLEIS@nrc.gov. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 919.520 Who places the information into the EPLS? Federal officials who take actions to exclude persons under this part or officials who are responsible for identifying disqualified persons must enter the following information about those persons into the *EPLS*: ( a ) Information required by § 919.515(a);
( b ) The Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) of the excluded or disqualified person, including the social security number (SSN) for an individual, if the number is available and may be disclosed under law;
( c ) Information about an excluded or disqualified person, generally within five working days, after— ( 1 ) Taking an exclusion action;
( 2 ) Modifying or rescinding an exclusion action;
( 3 ) Finding that a person is disqualified; or
( 4 ) Finding that there has been a change in the status of a person who is listed as disqualified.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

June 21, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00038-CR

IN RE JOVANY JAMPHER PAREDES, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1241896

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 24, 2022, relator Jovany Jampher Paredes filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable 

Colleen Gaido, presiding judge of the 337th District Court of Harris County, to 

rule on two pending motions: (1) “Motion for Forensic DNA Testing Under 
2

Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure”; and (2) “Motion to Appoint 

Counsil [sic] under Ch. 64.01 of the C.C.P.”

By Order dated April 26, 2022, this Court advised relator that his petition 

does not comply with Rules 52.3(j), 52.3(k), and 52.7(a) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. In the Order, the court notified relator that “his petition for 

writ of mandamus will be dismissed unless relator supplements and/or amends his

petition to addresses the issues identified above on or before May 26, 2022.”

To date, relator has not supplemented or amended his petition to comply 

with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and this Court’s Order. As such,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
No. II-09-007 February 10, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the NRC’s Region II 

office in Atlanta have selected Phil O’Bryan as the new senior resident 

inspector at the Brunswick nuclear power plant, located near Southport, N.C. 

He joins NRC Resident Inspector Greg Kolcum and Site Secretary Betty 

Hitchuk at the plant, which is operated by Progress Energy. 

O'Bryan joined the NRC as a project engineer in the Region II office 

in August 2003. He later held the positions of resident inspector and senior resident inspector at 

the Harris Nuclear Plant near Raleigh. Prior to joining the NRC, O'Bryan served in the U.S. 

Navy’s nuclear service for six years, and worked as an engineer at Bettis Atomic Power 

Laboratories for eight years. O'Bryan holds a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the 

University of Southern Indiana and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from the University 

of Tennessee. 

“Phil O’Bryan has the experience and commitment to safety to carry out the NRC 

mission of protecting people and the environment, and to help ensure the safe operation of the 

Brunswick plant,” said NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident inspectors can be assigned to 

any one site for up to seven years. 

The Brunswick resident inspectors can be reached at 910-457-9531. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov