alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2027 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2027

                    For the relief of Zdanko Lisak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2003

Mr. LaTourette introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Zdanko Lisak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL OF, OR DENIAL OF ADMISSION TO, 
              ZDANKO LISAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 212(a) and 237(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, Zdanko Lisak may not be removed from 
the United States, or denied admission to the United States, by reason 
of any act of his that is a ground for removal or denial of admission 
and is reflected in the records of the Immigration and Naturalization 
Service of the Department of Justice, or the Visa Office of the 
Department of State, on the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Rescission of Outstanding Order of Removal.--The Attorney 
General shall rescind any outstanding order of removal or deportation, 
or any finding of deportability, that has been entered against Zdanko 
Lisak by reason of any act described in subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
From: Jason Dewees <Dewees.Jason@epamail.epa.gov>

To: Jodi Howard <Howard.Jodi@epamail.epa.gov>

CC: "Philip Crawford" <Philip.Crawford@erg.com>, "Colin Hayes" <Colin.Hayes@erg.com>, Barrett Parker

<Parker.Barrett@epamail.epa.gov>, Robin Segall <Segall.Robin@epamail.epa.gov>, Peter Westlin <Westlin.Peter@epamail.epa.gov>, Ray

Merrill <Ray.Merrill@erg.com>

Date: 2/2/2012 6:09 PM

Subject: Method 25 A RDL

Jodi,

MTG has determined that the representative detection limit(RDL) for

Method 25A for a 10 ppm propane span would be 0.5 ppmwv propane. We

arrived at this representative detection limit by surveying the typical

flame ionization analyzers in use by the testing community and

evaluating the required method criteria in Method 25A. The survey of

the instruments yielded several vender stated instrument detection

limits from 0.01 to 0.5 ppm as Carbon with one independent third party

degermation of approximately 0.8 ppm as carbon. In addition, several

instruments minium reportable resolution is 0.1 ppm as propane. The

method criteria allows for a 3% zero and span drift during performance

runs and an initia l criteria of 5% of the calibration gas. The sum

allowable calibration error and drift would be approximately 0.475 ppm

as propane (using a 3.5 ppm propane span gas), which would be higher

than the instrumental detection limits.

References

40 CFR 60 Appe ndix A

- 7, Method 25A

- Determination of Total Gaseous

Organic Concentration using a Flame Ionization Analyzer

http://rental.cleanair.com/sites/default/files/51cht.pdf

http://www.jum.com/products/analyzers/ve7.html

http://www.signal

- group.com/Tech_sheets/mcerts2.pdf

http://www.signal

- group.com/Tech_sheets/mcerts2.pdf

Jason M DeWees

USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD/MTG

109 TW Alexander Drive (E143

- 02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919)541

- 9724(Voice)/(919)541

- 0516(Fax)

email: dewees.jason@epa. gov
§ 23.6 Definitions. ( a ) *Operating units.* Bureaus and other organizational entities outside the Office of the Secretary charged with carrying out specified substantive functions (*i.e.*, programs).
( b ) *Organizational units.* The organizational units within the Department of Commerce are:
Office of the Secretary Bureau of Economic Analysis Economic Development Administration Bureau of the Census International Trade Administration Minority Business Development Agency National Bureau of Standards National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Telecommunications and Information Administration National Technical Information Service Patent and Trademark Office United States Travel and Tourism Administration
###### Editorial Note on Part 20

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 20 appear at 68 FR 51355, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 20.6 Burden of proof.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions outlined in § 20.5 is on the recipient of Federal financial assistance.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2000-2

             ------------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-2 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
                  Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
                  the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer during the period
                  from the closing date until December 31, 2000, and of
                  performance under this Indenture has been made under the
                  supervision of the undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
                  review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture
                  throughout the period from the closing date until December 31,
                  2000. No default in the compliance of any such condition or
                  covenant has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in
                  paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.



                                                  (signatures on following page)

<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 28th day of March, 2001.

                                         By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, National
                                         Association, as Administrator


                                         By:      /s/ Keith Schuck
                                                  --------------------------
                                         Name:    Keith Schuck
                                         Title:   Senior Vice President
### **CHAPTER 1—GENERAL**

Sec.
101.
Definitions.
102.
Dependent parents.
103.
Special provisions relating to marriages.
104.
Approval of educational institutions.
105.
Line of duty and misconduct.
106.
Certain service deemed to be active service.
107.
Certain service deemed not to be active service.
108.
Seven-year absence presumption of death.
109.
Benefits for discharged members of allied forces.
110.
Preservation of disability ratings.
111.
Payments or allowances for beneficiary travel.
111A.
Transportation of individuals to and from Department facilities.
112.
Presidential memorial certificate program.
113.
Treatment of certain programs under sequestration procedures.
114.
Multiyear procurement.
115.
Acquisition of real property.
116.
Reports to Congress: cost information.
117.
Advance appropriations for certain accounts.
118.
Submission of reports to Congress in electronic form.
119.
Contracting for statistical analyses and data evaluation.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2020**—Pub. L. 116–171, title III, §306(b), Oct. 17, 2020, 134 Stat. 805, added item 119.

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–235, div. I, title II, §244(c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2569, added item 117 and struck out former item 117 "Advance appropriations for certain medical care accounts".

**2013**—Pub. L. 112–260, title II, §202(c), Jan. 10, 2013, 126 Stat. 2424, added item 111A.

**2010**—Pub. L. 111–275, title X, §1001(a), Oct. 13, 2010, 124 Stat. 2896, added item 118 and struck out former item 118 "Reports to Congress: submission in electronic form".

Pub. L. 111–163, title X, §1003(b), May 5, 2010, 124 Stat. 1183, added items 117 and 118 and struck out former item 117 "Advance appropriations for certain medical care accounts".

**2009**—Pub. L. 111–81, §3(b), Oct. 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 2138, which directed addition of item 117 after item 113, was executed by adding item 117 after item 116 to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

**2000**—Pub. L. 106–419, title IV, §403(d)(1)(B), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1864, added item 116.

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–86, title IV, §402(b), Aug. 14, 1991, 105 Stat. 422, added item 115.

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–237, title VI, §601(b)(2), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2094, struck out "for certain medical items" after "Multiyear procurement" in item 114.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–322, title I, §108(e)(2), title IV, §404(b), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 498, 547, substituted "Payments or allowances for beneficiary travel" for "Travel expenses" in item 111 and added item 114.

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–576, title VI, §601(a)(2), title VII, §701(1)(B), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3289, 3290, struck out "; husbands" after "parents" in item 102 and added item 113.

**1972**—Pub. L. 92–540, title IV, §409, Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1092, substituted "Dependent parents; husbands" for "Dependent parents and dependent husbands" in item 102.

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–88, §1(b), July 24, 1965, 79 Stat. 264, added item 112.

**1964**—Pub. L. 88–445, §1(c), Aug. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 464, substituted "Preservation of disability ratings" for "Preservation of total disability ratings" in item 110.
LENINGRAD OBLAST LAW

----

**February1998**
by Nikolai Nemchinov & Gennady Khareyn
The Leningrad Oblast has enacted a new investment law introducing substantial tax incentives andother benefits for investors in the region.  The new law "On Investment Activity in the LeningradOblast," enacted July 22, 1997, sets out local benefits for newly-established enterprises withinvestments over 6 billion rubles ($1 million, as calculated prior to the ruble redenomination whichbegan January 1, 1998; see BISNIS Bulletin, December 1997/January 1998, Page 6).  The lawindicates the oblast administration's flexibility and willingness to accomodate investors, but U.S.companies should remember that federal taxes are by far the greatest share of the tax burden inRussia, and that Russian federal law supercedes local legislation in tax matters.
The 1997 law expands tax privileges for new enterprises, including those with foreignparticipation, beyond the provisions of the oblast's 1994 investment law.  The 1997 statute isdesigned to encourage Russian and foreign investment and stimulate manufacturing in the region.  According to the law, an investor can obtain tax breaks in the Leningrad Oblast, provided it: (1) isa legal entity properly registered with the Russian authorities; (2) invests in the development ofindustry, construction, or agriculture in the oblast; and (3) has concluded a special investmentagreement with the oblast administration.
**Locally-Registered Entity Required**
Issue Date: 08/05/09 -1- 09-019

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 09-019

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. ________ ________ IP 65001.D 08/05/09

2. ________ ________ IP 65001.09 08/05/09

3. ________ ________ IP 65001.13 08/05/09

4. IP 81073 05/09/84 IP 81073 08/05/09

TRAINING: None

REMARKS: The following inspection procedures are issued to provide initial guidance

for Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) related 

inspections under 10 CFR Part 52:

IP 65001.D (Inspection of the ITAAC-Related Operational Testing 

Program)

IP 65001.09 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Electric and Fiber 

Optic Cable)

IP 65001.13 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of

Load Handling Equipment and Fuel Racks)

IP 81073 (Access Control (Fuel Facility) - Packages, Material, and 

Strategic Special Nuclear Material (SSNM)) has been revised to: 

(1) emphasize the risk-informed, performance-based approach to 

inspection and (2) impose changes to inspection activities due to orders 

issued that have not been incorporated by rulemaking. 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard for IP 65001.D, IP 65001.09, and IP 65001.13.
Issue Date: 08/05/09 -2- 09-019

Distribution for IP 81073, has been designated as containing “Official Use

Only - Security-Related Information” and is therefore not available to the public. For 

information on this IP, please contact Oleg Bukharin at 301-415-3551 or Larry Harris at 

301-415-5072.

END
§ 9801.206 Response to appeal of a denial of access. ( a ) *Access granted.* If the Chairperson or the Chairperson's designee determines that access to the records should be granted, the response will state how access will be provided if the records are not included with the response.
( b ) *Denial affirmed.* Any decision that either partially or fully affirms the initial decision to deny access or no record finding shall inform the requester of the right to seek judicial review of the decision in accordance with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(g)).
( c ) *When appeal is required.* If a requester wishes to seek review by a court of any adverse determination or denial of a request, the requester must first appeal it under § 9801.205.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.1

                         MERGER AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
                                COMBANC, INC. AND
                               THE COMMERCIAL BANK

On April 13, 1998, shareholders of The Commercial Bank (the "Bank") approved a
Merger Agreement ("Agreement") pursuant to which ComBanc,Inc. (the "Company")
acquired all of the outstanding stock of the Bank as a result of the exchange of
shares between the shareholders of the Bank and the Company. After the share
exchange which became effective on August 31, 1998, the Bank survived as a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and continues its operations as The
Commercial Bank. Under the terms of the Agreement, each one of the existing
outstanding shares of the Bank's common stock was exchanged for two of the
Company's common shares so that each existing shareholder of the Bank became a
shareholder of the Company, owning the same number and percentage of shares in
the Company as the Bank. The shares of the Company issued in connection with the
transaction were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Act"), in reliance upon the exemption from registration set forth in
Section 3(a)(12) of the Act.

         As a result of the transaction described above, the Company is the
successor issuer to the Bank pursuant to Rule 12g-3 promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). The Bank is subject to the
informational requirements of the Exchange Act and in accordance with Section
12(I) thereof has timely filed reports and other information with the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRS"). Such reports and other
information filed by the Bank with the FRS may be examined without charge at, or
copies obtained upon payment of prescribed fees from, the Securities Disclosure
Division, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Stop 153A,
Washington, D.C. 20551.

                                       80
§ 630.210 Uncommon tours of duty. ( a ) An agency may require that an employee with an uncommon tour of duty accrue and use leave on the basis of that uncommon tour of duty. The leave accrual rates for such employees shall be directly proportional (based on the number of hours in the biweekly tour of duty and the accrual rate of the corresponding leave category) to the standard leave accrual rates for employees who accrue and use leave on the basis of an 80-hour biweekly tour of duty. One hour (or appropriate fraction thereof) of leave shall be charged for each hour (or appropriate fraction thereof) of absence from the uncommon tour of duty.
( b ) When an employee is converted to a different tour of duty for leave purposes, his or her leave balances shall be converted to the proper number of hours based on the proportion of hours in the new tour of duty compared to the former tour of duty.
( c ) An agency shall establish an uncommon tour of duty for each firefighter compensated under part 550, subpart M, of this chapter. The uncommon tour of duty shall correspond directly to the firefighter's regular tour of duty, as defined in § 550.1302 of this chapter, so that each firefighter accrues and uses leave on the basis of that tour.
( d ) In applying § 550.805(g) of this chapter, and §§ 630.306(b), and 630.310(d), the referenced number of hours for full-time employees (416 hours and 208 hours) shall be proportionally adjusted based on the percentage amount by which the number of hours in the uncommon tour of duty exceeds the number of hours in a regular full-time tour of duty. For example, if the uncommon tour of duty consists of 120 hours in a biweekly pay period instead of the 80 hours for a regular full-time employee, the percentage adjustment would be 50 percent [(120/80) − 1]; accordingly, 416 hours would be converted to 624 hours and 208 hours would be converted to 312 hours.
[59 FR 66635, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 63 FR 64595, Nov. 23, 1998; 67 FR 15467, Apr. 2, 2002; 85 FR 48101, Aug. 10, 2020]
NRC SEEKS ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INPUT ON 

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ISSUE 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission seeks additional public input on ways to improve 

the agency’s approach to the groundwater contamination issue. This is an additional opportunity 

for public input beyond that of the agency’s April 20 workshop. 

 Recent tritium contamination of groundwater wells and soil from buried piping leaks at 

several nuclear power plants has raised questions regarding the completeness of NRC actions to 

date and whether those actions need to be augmented. A task force was formed in response to 

these incidents. 

 On April 20, the NRC staff held a public workshop where a variety of government, 

industry, academic and public experts had the opportunity to provide their input on this matter. 

The meeting is available for viewing through the NRC webcast archives at http://video.nrc.gov/. 

The task force will provide its observations, findings and recommendations in a written 

report that will be reviewed by staff. Public feedback and comments will be considered for the 

report that is expected to be available to the public in June. Comments can be sent to 

chuck.casto@nrc.gov by May 13. 

 A copy of the memorandum establishing the task force can be found on the NRC Web 

site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/buried-pipes-tritium.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-083 May 6, 2010
§ 842.606 Election of a self-only annuity or a one-half reduced annuity by married employees and Members. ( a ) A married employee may not elect a self-only annuity or a one-half reduced annuity to provide a current spouse annuity without the consent of the current spouse or a waiver of spousal consent by OPM in accordance with § 842.607.
( b ) Evidence of spousal consent or a request for waiver of spousal consent must be filed on a form prescribed by OPM.
( c ) The spousal consent form will require that a notary public or other official authorized to administer oaths certify that the current spouse presented identification, gave consent, signed or marked the form, and acknowledged that the consent was given freely in the notary's or official's presence.
( d ) The form described in paragraph (c) of this section may be executed before a notary public, an official authorized by the law of the jurisdiction where executed to administer oaths, or an OPM employee designated for that purpose by the Associate Director.
( e ) A request for waiver of the spousal consent requirement must be by letter and fully state the basis for the request.
( f ) The amount of the reduction in the retiree's annuity for a one-half reduced annuity to provide a current spouse annuity is 5 percent of the retiree's annuity.
[52 FR 2061, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 54679, Nov. 20, 1992]
**/www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/)"  BORDER="0" hspace=14 vspace=2>**
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27753]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  83 FR 64630, 17 
December 2018.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Wednesday, December 
19, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following item will not be considered 
during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, July 18, 2018:
     Whether to issue a Request for Comment on nature and 
content of quarterly reports and earnings releases issued by reporting 
companies.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 18, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27753 Filed 12-18-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
GEORGIA INVESTMENT LAW

----
### §153709. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account; and

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its national convention.

(b) Inspection.—A member, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1430.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153709 | 36:1014. | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §14, 76 Stat. 505. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF INSIGHT MIDWEST, L.P.



The undersigned hereby certify that the annual report on Form 10-K of Insight Midwest, L.P. (the registrant) for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



/s/ Michael S. WillnerMichael S. WillnerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerInsight Midwest, L.P.March 9, 2004/s/ John AbbotJohn AbbotSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerInsight Midwest, L.P.March 9, 2004