alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

SYSTEM

v.

CROSS PETITION OF: PENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION,

Intervenor :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 344 MAL 2015

Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Published Opinion and Order

of the Commonwealth Court at Nos. 207 CD 2014 and 293 CD 2014, at 113 A.3d 9 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2015) entered on March
20, 2015, affirming, reversing and remanding the Order Dated of the Office of Open Records at No. AP 2013

- 1830 entered on January 31, 2014

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED , the order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED , and the matter is

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with Pennsylvania State Education Ass’n v.

De p’t of Community and Economic Development

, 148 A.3d 142 (Pa. 2016).
# L_2022291EN.01006801.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/68

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 177/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2169]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/226 of 6 February 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/226 of 6 February 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21as (Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 0226: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/226 of 6 February 2019 (OJ L 41, 12.2.2019, p. 100).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 0226: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/226 of 6 February 2019 (OJ L 41, 12.2.2019, p. 100).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/226 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 41, 12.2.2019, p. 100.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
§ 280.201 Violations. ( a ) *Engaging in prohibited conduct.* No person may engage in any conduct prohibited by or contrary to, or refrain from engaging in any action required by the Act, this part, or any order issued thereunder.
( b ) *Sale of fasteners.* It shall be unlawful for a manufacturer or distributor, in conjunction with the sale or offer for sale of fasteners from a single lot, to knowingly misrepresent or falsify— ( 1 ) The record of conformance for the lot of fasteners;
( 2 ) The identification, characteristics, properties, mechanical or performance marks, chemistry, or strength of the lot of fasteners; or
( 3 ) The manufacturers' insignia.
( c ) Manufacturers' insignia. Unless the specifications provide otherwise, fasteners that are required by the applicable consensus standard or standards to bear an insignia identifying their manufacturer shall not be offered for sale or sold in commerce unless ( 1 ) The fasteners bear such insignia; and
( 2 ) The manufacturer has complied with the insignia recordation requirements established under 15 U.S.C. 5407(b).
[61 FR 50558, Sept. 26, 1996, as amended at 63 FR 18275, Apr. 14, 1998; 63 FR 34965, June 26, 1998; 63 FR 51526, Sept. 28, 1998. Redesignated and amended at 65 FR 39802, June 28, 2000]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

142095 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142095 

 COA: 291882 

Kent CC: 08-004992-FC 

MARVIN MICHAEL JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 23, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2022298EN.01001601.xml

| 17.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 194/2019

of 10 July 2019

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2216]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/248 of 13 November 2018 correcting Regulation (EU) No 63/2011 laying down detailed provisions for the application for a derogation from the specific CO2 emission targets pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/248 of 13 November 2018 correcting Regulation (EU) No 63/2011 laying down detailed provisions for the application for a derogation from the specific CO2 emission targets pursuant to Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 21aea (Commission Regulation (EU) No 63/2011) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32019 R 0248: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/248 of 13 November 2018 (OJ L 42, 13.2.2019, p. 5).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32019 R 0248: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/248 of 13 November 2018 (OJ L 42, 13.2.2019, p. 5).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/248 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 July 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 42, 13.2.2019, p. 5.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Exhibit 31.2
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Stephen R. Jeuck, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SouthernCommunity Bancorp (the “Issuer”);
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
 4. The Issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have significant role in the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004         /s/ Stephen R. Jeuck   Stephen R. Jeuck   Chief Financial Officer
Reprocessing And Recycli

Environmental Protectio

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissio

Reprocessing Workshop

September 7th and 8th

Rockville, MD
Several Aspects To

Environmental Protection

• NEPA Requirements

– EIS required for rulemaking– May generate a topical report or BTP a

precursor

• Effluents/Emissions (current focus)• Other aspects

– For example, confinement/containmen

filters/types

September 2010 Reprocessing Workshop
Effluents And Emissions

• Limits established by the EPA in 40 CFR 190

– NRC regulates to the EPA limit via Part 20

• Dose Limits relatively low

– Based upon individual health impact– 25/75/25 mrem/yr whole body/thyroid/other organ

• 1 chest x-ray is about 10 mrem• movi t D f W hi t DC i b t 200 ing 

to 

Denver 

from 

Washing

ton DC is a

bou

t 200 

– Easily met by modern, commercial reprocessing 

• Quantity (radioactive – curie) limits more diffic

ascertain and meet

– Based upon collective exposure of populations– Very small doses to very large populations– This “microdoses to megapopulations” may overs

impacts

September 2010 Reprocessing Workshop
EPA 40 CFR 190 Limits

Apply To Entire Fuel Cycle 

And Power Reactors

Annual Dose Equivalent Limit, mrem/yr

Isotope Limit 

Essentially all of the releases would come from reprocessing operations

mrem/yrWhole body dose 25Thyroid 75Any other organ 25

Kr-85 50,000

Ci/Gwe-yr

I-129 5 milliCi/

Gwe-yr

Pu-239 and other alphaemitting TRU

0.5 milliCi/Gwe-yr

September 2010 Reprocessing Workshop
Basis For EPA Quantity

(curie) Limits

• Population (Collective) dose• 1,000 GWe nuclear power (10 times ac

value)

• 25 1, y p gp 500 MTIHM/

yr re

processin

g

plant

(actual value is zero)

• Relatively short cooling times before 

reprocessing (1-5 years; current practi5 years)

• Land-locked site (current practice is co

based) 

September 2010 Reprocessing Workshop
Analysis

• Some emission control technologies ad

potential hazards (e.g., voloxidation, krand tritium capture)

– Do benefits outweigh the risks?

• Use of old SNF reduces Kr and T sig 

nif

– Significant quantity of SNF > 30 years afte

discharge

– Reduces Kr and T by circa 90%– Loses fuel value of Pu-241 and increases 

(recycle/disposal)

• Iodine limit based upon many assumpt

some of which may not be valid today

September 2010 Reprocessing Workshop 
Any Specific Requirement

For Environmental Protectio

• Technologies

– Confinement/containment– Filtration

• P f er ormance-b d ase

d

– Minimum decontamination factors

• ALARASeptember 2010 Reprocessing Workshop
Potential Points

For Discussion

• Specific environmental topics or topica

reports

• Potential sources of data and analyses• App , , 

roaches, assessments, or methodo

to use

• Siting attributes (e.g., coast vs desert, 

vs arid)

• SNF time, aging, or other requirements• Technology or performance requiremeSeptember 2010 Reprocessing Workshop
EBRD LAUNCHES NEW AGRIBUSINESS FUND

----
Editorial Note on Part 735
Editorial Note: Part 1001, added to this chapter at 31 FR 873, Jan. 22, 1966 and revised at 32 FR 11113, Aug. 1, 1967, 36 FR 6874, Apr. 9, 1971, 61 FR 36996, July 16, 1996, and 71 FR 43345, Aug. 1, 2006, supplements this part 735.

§ 735.202 What are the restrictions on conduct that safeguard the examination process? ( a ) An employee shall not, with or without compensation, teach, lecture, or write for the purpose of the preparation of a person or class of persons for an examination of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) or other agency to which examining authority has been delegated, or Board of Examiners for the Foreign Service that depends on information obtained as a result of the employee's Government employment.
( b ) This section does not preclude the preparation described in paragraph (a) of this section if: ( 1 ) The information upon which the preparation is based has been made available to the general public or will be made available on request; or
( 2 ) Such preparation is authorized in writing by the Director of OPM, or his or her designee, or by the head of an agency to which examining authority had been delegated, or his or her designee, or by the Director General of the Foreign Service, or his or her designee, as applicable.
§ 19.9 When will Commerce entities transfer a Commerce debt to the Treasury Department's Bureau of the Fiscal Service for collection? ( a ) Commerce entities will transfer any Commerce debt that is more than 120 days delinquent to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service for debt collection services, a process known as “cross-servicing.” *See* 31 U.S.C. 3711(g), 31 CFR 285.12, and 31 U.S.C. 3716(c)(6). Commerce entities may transfer Commerce debts delinquent 120 days or less to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service in accordance with the procedures described in 31 CFR 285.12. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service takes appropriate action to collect or compromise the transferred Commerce debt, or to suspend or terminate collection action thereon, in accordance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and authorities applicable to the Commerce debt and the collection action to be taken. *See* 31 CFR 285.12(b) and 285.12(c)(2). Appropriate action can include, but is not limited to, contact with the debtor, referral of the Commerce debt to the Treasury Offset Program, private collection agencies or the Department of Justice, reporting of the Commerce debt to credit bureaus, and administrative wage garnishment.
( b ) At least sixty (60) days prior to transferring a Commerce debt to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Commerce entities will send notice to the debtor as required by § 19.4 of this part. Commerce entities will certify to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, in writing, that the Commerce debt is valid, delinquent, legally enforceable, and that there are no legal bars to collection. In addition, Commerce entities will certify their compliance with all applicable due process and other requirements as described in this part and other Federal laws. *See* 31 CFR 285.12(i) regarding the certification requirement.
( c ) As part of its debt collection process, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service uses the Treasury Offset Program to collect Commerce debts by administrative and tax refund offset. *See* 31 CFR 285.12(g). The Treasury Offset Program is a centralized offset program administered by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service to collect delinquent debts owed to Federal agencies and states (including past-due child support). Under the Treasury Offset Program, before a Federal payment is disbursed, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service compares the name and taxpayer identification number (TIN) of the payee with the names and TINs of debtors that have been submitted by Federal agencies and states to the Treasury Offset Program database. If there is a match, the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (or, in some cases, another Federal disbursing agency) offsets all or a portion of the Federal payment, disburses any remaining payment to the payee, and pays the offset amount to the creditor agency. Federal payments eligible for offset include, but are not limited to, income tax refunds, salary, travel advances and reimbursements, retirement and vendor payments, and Social Security and other benefit payments.
§ 837.303 Annuity offset. ( a ) *Applicability.* When the right to receive annuity continues during reemployment (even though actual receipt of annuity may have been waived under 5 U.S.C. 8345(d) or 8465(a)), the pay of the reemployed annuitant shall be offset by the amount of annuity allocable to the period of reemployment, except that— ( 1 ) No amount shall be offset from pay in accordance with this section for a period for which the annuitant has elected to receive FEC benefits in lieu of annuity; and
( 2 ) No amount shall be offset from a lump-sum payment of annual leave, made on or after termination of the reemployment period.
( b ) *Payment.* The employing agency shall pay to the Fund the full amount required to be offset from a reemployed annuitant's salary under this section in accordance with instructions issued by OPM. Payment in full to the Fund is not contingent on actual offset from the reemployed annuitant's salary.
( c ) *Computation.* To compute the amount of the annuity offset for any particular pay period, divide the amount of annuity for the calendar days included in the pay period by the number of hours that would constitute a full-time tour of duty for that pay period, then multiply the result by the number of hours actually paid for the pay period, not to exceed the number of hours that constitutes a full-time tour of duty.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Levitt Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glen R. Gilbert,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/S/ Glen R. Gilbert
------------------------------
Name:  Glen R. Gilbert
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 12, 2003

The foregoing certificate is provided solely for purposes of complying with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and for no other purpose
whatsoever. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth herein or in any
of the Company's previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate the
Company's future filings, including this Report on Form 10-Q, in whole or in
part, this Certificate shall not be incorporated by reference into any such
filings. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Levitt Corporation and will be retained by Levitt Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       42
#### Ronald Tyler *v.*George D. Bronson, Warden

*Suzanne Zitser,*assistant public defender, and *Joette Katz,*public defender, in support of the petition.

*Judith Rossi,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided February 2, 1988

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 12 Conn. App. 621, is denied.
§ 2634.104 Policies. ( a ) Title I of the Act requires that high-level Federal officials disclose publicly their personal financial interests, to ensure confidence in the integrity of the Federal Government by demonstrating that they are able to carry out their duties without compromising the public trust. Title I also authorizes the Office of Government Ethics to establish a confidential (nonpublic) financial disclosure system for less senior executive branch personnel in certain designated positions, to facilitate internal agency conflict-of-interest review.
( b ) Public and confidential financial disclosure serves to prevent conflicts of interest and to identify potential conflicts, by providing for a systematic review of the financial interests of both current and prospective officers and employees. These reports assist agencies in administering their ethics programs and providing counseling to employees.
( c ) Financial disclosure reports are not net worth statements. Financial disclosure systems seek only the information that the President, Congress, or OGE as the supervising ethics office for the executive branch has deemed relevant to the administration and application of the criminal conflict of interest laws, other statutes on ethical conduct or financial interests, and Executive orders or regulations on standards of ethical conduct.
( d ) Nothing in the Act, the STOCK Act, or this part requiring reporting of information or the filing of any report will be deemed to authorize receipt of income, honoraria, gifts, or reimbursements; holding of assets, liabilities, or positions; or involvement in transactions that are prohibited by law, Executive order, or regulation.
( e ) The provisions of title I of the Act, the STOCK Act, and this part requiring the reporting of information supersede any general requirement under any other provision of law or regulation on the reporting of information required for purposes of preventing conflicts of interest or apparent conflicts of interest. However, the provisions of title I and this part do not supersede the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 7342 (the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act).
( f ) This part is intended to be gender-neutral; therefore, use of the terms he, his, and him include she, hers, and her, and vice versa.
### §60108. Duty to maintain tax-exempt status

The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1346.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 60108 | 36:4814. | Nov. 5, 1990, Pub. L. 101–510, title XVI, §1615, 104 Stat. 1738. |

Section