alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 890.108 Will OPM waive requirements for continued coverage during retirement? ( a ) Under 5 U.S.C. 8905(b), OPM may waive the eligibility requirements for health benefits coverage as an annuitant for an individual when, in its sole discretion, it determines that due to exceptional circumstances it would be against equity and good conscience not to allow a person to be enrolled in the FEHB Program as an annuitant.
( b ) The individual's failure to satisfy the eligibility requirements must be due to exceptional circumstances. An individual requesting a waiver must provide OPM with evidence that: ( 1 ) The individual intended to have FEHB coverage as an annuitant (retiree);
( 2 ) The circumstances that prevented the individual from meeting the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 8905(b) were beyond the individual's control; and
( 3 ) The individual acted reasonably to protect his or her right to continue coverage into retirement.
[72 FR 19100, Apr. 17, 2007]
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–271

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3167, GERALD

B.H. SOLOMON FREEDOM CONSOLIDATION ACT OF 2001

NOVEMBER 6, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

R E P O R T

[To accompany H. Res. 277]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 277, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3167, the Gerald B.H. Solomon Freedom Consolidation Act of 2001, under a

modified closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate in the

House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking

minority member of the Committee on International Relations.

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the

bill. The rule also provides that the amendment recommended by

the Committee on International Relations now printed in the bill

shall be considered as adopted.

The rule further provides for consideration of only the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the Congressional

Record, if offered by Representative Lantos or his designee, which

shall be considered as read and shall be separately debatable for

one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent.

Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51338 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CULLEN REED HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:91-CR-43-2

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Cullen Reed Harris, federal prisoner # 01864-063, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion for a nunc pro tunc order challenging the sentences imposed following his convictions for conspiracy to manufacture more than 1,000 grams of methamphetamine and manufacturing more than 1,000 grams of methamphetamine. The district court denied Harris leave to proceed IFP on appeal, certifying that the appeal was not taken in good faith. By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Harris isNo. 04-51338 -2- challenging the district court’s certification. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); F ED . R. A PP . P. 24(a)(5). However, Harris has not demonstrated any nonfrivolous ground for appeal. Harris argues that the sentence enhancement he received pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) was improper. For the first time on appeal, he asserts that his sentence was void ab initio because 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(1) was held unconstitutional in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). This appeal is “from the denial of a meaningless, unauthorized motion.” See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). We will not consider Harris’s Booker claim because it was raised for the first time in an appeal from the denial of a collateral attack on his sentence. See Whitehead v. Johnson , 157 F.3d 384, 388 (5th Cir. 1998). Harris has failed to show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Harris is WARNED that the filing or prosecution of frivolous appeals in the future will subject him to sanctions. See F ED . R. A PP . P. 38; Clark v. Green , 814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987).
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
|                                                         |                  | Exhibit 99(a)
|-------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------
|Household Finance Corporation                            |                  |              
|Household Receivables Funding, Inc. III                  |                  |              
|Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2000-1 |                 
|                                                         |                  |              
|                                                         |                  |              
|Original Class A Principal                               | 1,103,333,000.00 |              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                          | 1,103,333.00     |              
|Original Class B Principal                               | 96,667,000.00    |              
|Number of Class B Bonds (000's)                          | 96,667.00        |              
|                                                         |                  |              
|                                                         |                  |              
|Distribution Date                                        |                  | 2003 Totals  
|                                                         |                  |              
|CLASS A                                                  |                  |              
|Class A Principal Distributions                          |                  | 0.00         
|Class A Interest                                         |                  | 15,308,424.49
|                                                         |                  |              
|                                                         |                  |              
|CLASS B                                                  |                  |              
|Class B Principal Distributions                          |                  | 0.00         
|Class B Interest                                         |                  | 1,595,353.32 
|                                                         |                  |
Exhibit 31.1
I, Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer of Levitt Corporation, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Levitt Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and c. Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004   By: /s/ Alan B. Levan  Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1977 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1977

               To suspend temporarily the duty on TMPME.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

  Ms. Kaptur introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on TMPME.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TMPME.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.07.11    Trimethylolpropa  Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     ne monoallyl                                                            31/2006          ''
                     ether (CAS No.                                                                            .
                     682-11-1)
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     9902.32.59)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99(i)

 

 

 

 

 

	ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

	HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION

	HOUSEHOLD RECEIVABLES FUNDING, INC. III

	HOUSEHOLD CREDIT CARD MASTER NOTE TRUST I

	________________________________________________________

 

		The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer ("HFC"), pursuant to a Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 16, 2000 (as amended and supplemented, the "Agreement"), by and among Household Receivables Funding, Inc. III, as transferor, HFC, and Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, as Issuer, (the "Trust"), does hereby certify that:

		1.	HFC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

		2.	The undersigned is an Authorized Officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trust.

		3.	A review of the activities of the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2003 and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

		4.	Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

 

 

	5.	The following is a description of each default in 	the performance of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been made by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2003, which 	sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each such default:

NONE

 

		IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 25th day of March, 2004.

 

						HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION

						  as Servicer,

 

						By:____/s/ Steven H. Smith________

							Steven H. Smith

							Assistant Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIfundingIII.doc
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Cardillo, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of CCP  Worldwide,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
R. Allison,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respect,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations  of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/David R. Allison
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2004
# L_2022175EN.01003101.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 18/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1066]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2021/1226 of 21 December 2020 amending, for the purposes of adapting to scientific and technical progress, Annex II to Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards common noise assessment methods (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2021/1226 of 21 December 2020 amending, for the purposes of adapting to scientific and technical progress, Annex II to Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards common noise assessment methods (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 32g (Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32021 L 1226: Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2021/1226 of 21 December 2020 (OJ L 269, 28.7.2021, p. 65).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32021 L 1226: Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2021/1226 of 21 December 2020 (OJ L 269, 28.7.2021, p. 65).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Directive (EU) 2021/1226 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 269, 28.7.2021, p. 65.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-105 July 22, 2005

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM

EXTENDED OPERATION OF MILLSTONE POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statement on the

proposed renewal of the operating licenses for the Millstone Power Station, Units 2 and 3. The report

contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would preclude license

renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The Millstone nuclear plant is located in Waterford, Conn., on Millstone Point between the

Niantic and Thames rivers, approximately 40 miles southeast of Hartford. The current operating

licenses expire on July 31, 2015, for Unit 2 and Nov. 25, 2025, for Unit 3. Dominion Nuclear

Connecticut, Inc., the licensee, submitted the applications for renewal of the licenses on Jan. 22, 2004.

As part of its environmental review of the applications, the NRC held public meetings near the

plant to discuss the scope of the review and the draft version of the environmental impact statement.

Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and representatives of state and

federal agencies.

The Millstone Final Environmental Impact Statement is available on the NRC’s Web site: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement22/index.html . Copies

are also available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room at One White Flint North, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md; the Waterford Public Library, 49 Rope Ferry Rd., Waterford, Conn.,

and the Three Rivers Community College, Thames River Campus Library, 574 New London Turnpike,

Norwich, Conn.

###
### §153703. Membership

Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights, privileges, and designation of classes of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation. Eligibility for membership is limited to—

(1) women who are the wives, mothers, daughters, and sisters of Union soldiers, sailors, and marines; and

(2) other loyal women who have not given aid or comfort to the enemies of the United States of America.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1428.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153703 | 36:1005. | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §5, 76 Stat. 503. |

Section

Before clause (1), the words "is limited to" are substituted for "shall be" for clarity.
Regional Corner: Irkutsk

----
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2154

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prevent an employer 

from placing a nonimmigrant who is an intracompany transferee with 

another employer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2003

Mr. MICA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to prevent 

an employer from placing a nonimmigrant who is an 

intracompany transferee with another employer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON PLACEMENT OF 

4 INTRACOMPANY TRANSFEREES. 

5 Section 214(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality 

6 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following: 

8 ‘‘(F)(i) No alien may be admitted or provided status 

9 as a nonimmigrant described in section 101(a)(15)(L) un-
2

•HR 2154 IH 

1 less the importing employer has filed with the Secretary 

2 of Labor an application stating that the employer will not 

3 place the nonimmigrant with another employer where—

4 ‘‘(I) the nonimmigrant performs duties in whole 

5 or in part at one or more worksites owned, operated, 

6 or controlled by such other employer; and 

7 ‘‘(II) there are indicia of an employment rela8 tionship between the nonimmigrant and such other 

9 employer. 

10 ‘‘(ii) The employer shall make available for public ex11 amination, within one working day after the date on which 

12 an application under this subparagraph is filed, at the em13 ployer’s principal place of business or worksite, a copy of 

14 each such application (and such accompanying documents 

15 as are necessary). The Secretary shall compile, on a cur16 rent basis, a list (by employer and by occupational classi17 fication) of the applications filed under this subparagraph. 

18 The Secretary shall make such list available for public ex19 amination in Washington, DC. The Secretary of Labor 

20 shall review such an application only for completeness and 

21 obvious inaccuracies. Unless the Secretary of Labor finds 

22 that an application is incomplete or obviously inaccurate, 

23 the Secretary of Labor shall certify to the Secretary of 

24 Homeland Security, within 7 days of the date of the filing 

25 of the application, that the requirements of this clause 
3

•HR 2154 IH 

1 have been satisfied. The application form shall include a 

2 clear statement explaining the liability under this subpara3 graph of an employer who places a nonimmigrant with an4 other employer in violation of clause (i). 

5 ‘‘(iii) The provisions of section 212(n)(2) shall apply 

6 to a failure to meet a condition of clause (i) in the same 

7 manner as such provisions apply to a failure to meet a 

8 condition of section 212(n)(1)(F).’’.

Æ