alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC PARTICIPATING IN NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES MEETING

FEB. 24 ON FIRST PHASE OF NRC-SPONSORED ANALYSIS OF CANCER RISKS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will present information during the National Academy 

of Sciences’ (NAS) first committee meeting of the NRC-sponsored study, “Analysis of Cancer 

Risks in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities: Phase 1.” The meeting’s public session will occur 

during the afternoon of Feb. 24 at the Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, in Washington, 

D.C.

The NRC will explain the agency’s rationale for asking the NAS to conduct this study, along 

with the NRC’s expectations, to the Committee. Members of the public are welcome to attend the 

open session, which will also be webcast. The NAS website 

(www.nationalacademies.org/cancerriskstudy) has additional details and will also provide any 

updates on the meeting. General questions on the study can be sent via e-mail to: crs@nas.edu.

The NAS project will update the 1990 U.S. National Institutes of Health – National Cancer 

Institute (NCI) report, “Cancer in Populations Living Near Nuclear Facilities” 

(http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/nuclear-facilities). The NRC uses the 1990 NCI 

report as a primary resource when communicating with the public about cancer mortality risk in 

counties that contain or are adjacent to nuclear power facilities. In the new study, the NRC is asking

the NAS to evaluate cancer diagnosis rates, in addition to mortality risk, for populations living near 

decommissioned, operating and proposed NRC-licensed nuclear facilities. Phase 1 of the NAS study 

will determine whether a technically defensible approach to meet the goals of the study request is 

feasible – and if so, the approach will be developed using scientifically sound processes for 

evaluating cancer risk that could be associated with nuclear facilities. 

The National Academy of Sciences is a non-governmental organization chartered by the 

U.S. Congress to advise the nation on issues of science, technology, and medicine. Through the 

National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, it carries out studies independently of the 

government using processes designed to promote transparency, objectivity, and technical rigor. 

More information on NAS methods for performing studies is available at:

http://www.nationalacademies.org/studycommitteprocess.pdf.

###

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand.

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No. 11-020 February 8, 2011
#### William H. Schofield, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Respondent, v. Dayve De Boris De Waltoff and Another, Defendants; Dora A. De Waltoff, Appellant. William H. Schofield, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Respondent, v. Mechanics Bank of Brooklyn and Another, Defendants; Dora A. De Waltoff, Appellant. William H. Schofield, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Respondent, v. Rebecca Wolper and Others, Defendants; Dora A. De Waltoff, Appellant.

Motions denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
NISEXPORT DOCUMENTATION

----
### [§311. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–145, title VI, §639(b), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 651]

Section, added Pub. L. 90–207, §1(2)(A), Dec. 16, 1967, 81 Stat. 651; amended Pub. L. 90–603, §1, Oct. 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 1187; Pub. L. 90–623, §3(5), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1314; Pub. L. 93–274, §1(3), May 6, 1974, 88 Stat. 95; Pub. L. 93–394, §1, Aug. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 792; Pub. L. 96–284, §4(d)(1)–(3), June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 591, 592; Pub. L. 96–513, title IV, §414(b), title V, §516(7), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2906, 2938, provided for continuation pay for dentists in the armed forces. See section 302b of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 639(f) of Pub. L. 99–145, set out as an Effective Date of 1985 Amendment note under section 302b of this title.
§ 2011.110 Suspension of certificate system. ( a ) *Suspension.* The U.S. Trade Representative may suspend the provisions of this subpart whenever he or she determines that such action gives due consideration to the interests in the U.S. sugar market of domestic producers and materially affected contracting parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Notice of such suspension and the effective date thereof shall be published in the Federal Register.
( b ) *Reinstatement.* The U.S. Trade Representative may at any time reinstate the operation of this subpart if he or she finds that the conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section no longer apply. Notice of such reinstatement and the effective date thereof shall be published in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Transitional provisions.* In the case of any suspension or reinstatement of the certificate system established by this subpart, the Secretary, in consultation with the United States Trade Representative, may prescribe such additional guidelines, instructions, and limitations which shall be applied or implemented by appropriate customs officials in order to ensure an orderly transition.
#### § 296.10 Third party in-kind contribution of research services.

NIST shall not issue a TIP award to a single recipient or joint venture whose proposed budget includes the use of third party in-kind contribution of research as cost share, and no costs shall be incurred under such a TIP project, until such time as an agreement between the recipient and the third party contributor of in-kind research has been executed by both parties and approved by NIST.
03-15-00232-CR

ALICIA NICOLE PEREZ, § IN THE

Appellant §

VS. § THIRD COURT

§

STATE OF TEXAS, § OF APPEALS

Appellee

APPELLANT’S THIRD MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Alicia Nicole Perez, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file

appellant’s briet pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

and for good cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 207th Judicial District Court of Comal

~County, Texas.

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. ALICIA

NICOLE PEREZ, and numbered CR2012-603.

3. Appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance.

4. Appellant was assessed probated sentence of four years.

5. Notice of appeal was given on 4/22/2015.

6. The clerk’s record was filed on 6/12/2015; the reporter’s record was

filed on 7/17/2b15.

7. The appellate brief was due on 9/16/2015.

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of 15 days from October 16,

2015, to November 2, 2015.

ACCEPTED

03-15-00232-CR

7434280

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

10/19/2015 1:52:08 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/19/2015 1:52:08 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
9. Two prior extensions have been received in this cause.

10. Defendant is currently free on bond.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested

extension:

Counsel just completed and filed a brief on September 28, 2015 in the

Fourth Court ofAppeals, No. 04-15-00204-CR, Robert Rodriguez v.

State ofTexas, and due to this, as well daily court appearances and

trial preparation, was unable to finish the instant brief

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this

Court grant this Third Motion To Extend Time to File Brief, and for such other and

further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted,

Schoon Law Firm, P.C.

200 N. Seguin Avenue

New Braunfels, Texas 78130

Tel: (830) 627-0044

Fax: (830) 620-5657

susan@~schoonIawfirm.com

By:_________________

Susan Schoon

State Bar No. 24046803

Attorney for Appellant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on October 19, 2015 a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was sewed on the District Attorney’s Office, Comal

County, Texas by fax to 830-608-2008.

&2v~ tzc

Susan Schoon
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.18

Savannah River Terminal Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4531
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Group Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Ronald A. Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date:   August 6, 2010 | /s/ Ronald A. Robinson                           |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Ronald A. Robinson                               |
|                             | President  & Chief Executive Officer

  |
KA Catalog Needed 

To Support Initial Exam Development
#### Lewis A. Dreyer, as Administrator of the Estate of Ballard Macdonald, Deceased, Appellant, v. Shapiro-Bernstein & Co., Inc., Respondent.

Order, so„far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 846.]
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2003

Received 

AN ACT

To amend the Communications Satellite of 1962 to provide 

for the orderly dilution of the ownership interest in 

Inmarsat by former signatories to the Inmarsat Operating Agreement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2312 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ORBIT Technical Cor3 rections Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING DEADLINES. 

5 Clause (ii) of section 621(5)(A) of the Communica6 tions Satellite Act of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 763(5)(A)) is 

7 amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and in9 serting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2003’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘December 31, 2004’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
No. II-10-026 April 16, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC AUGMENTS INSPECTION AT ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has formed an Augmented Inspection Team to 

further review an automatic reactor trip, two fires in the plant’s electrical systems and the plant 

operators’ response to those events at the Robinson nuclear plant on Sunday, March 28. 

An Alert was declared that evening at the Robinson plant, which is operated by Progress 

Energy near Hartsville, S.C., about 26 miles northwest of Florence. An Alert is the next to lowest 

NRC emergency classification for plant events, and the Robinson plant exited the Alert after 

about two and a half hours. 

The plant remained shut down and entered a planned refueling outage early. The NRC 

dispatched a three-person special inspection team to the Robinson plant two days after the 

original events. Further review by the company and the NRC found additional deficiencies in 

operations which increased the overall risk and pointed to the need for additional inspection. 

 

An Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) is formed by the NRC to review more significant 

events or issues at NRC-licensed facilities, and the Robinson AIT will expand the scope of the 

special inspection team sent to the site earlier. The AIT will include members of the special 

inspection team as well as five additional inspectors. The AIT will be led by NRC Region II 

Branch Chief Bob Haag and will officially begin work at the plant on Monday, April 19. 

“The increased risk associated with these new issues makes an augmented inspection 

team the appropriate level of review,” said NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes. 

“Upgrading the inspection to an AIT underscores our commitment to evaluate these issues 

thoroughly and ensure they are being properly addressed.” 

The AIT will hold an exit meeting with the company upon completion of the inspection 

to discuss its preliminary findings. That meeting will be open to interested members of the public 

and the news media, and team members will be available to answer questions after the results are 

presented. The AIT will also issue a written report 30 days after the completion of the inspection. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart B to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.221 Classification requirements. ( a ) DHS must develop a methodology for describing and documenting the duties, qualifications, and other requirements of categories of jobs, and DHS must make such descriptions and documentation available to affected employees.
( b ) An authorized agency official must— ( 1 ) Assign occupational series to jobs consistent with occupational series definitions established by OPM under 5 U.S.C. 5105 and 5346 or by DHS, after coordination with OPM; and
( 2 ) Apply the criteria and definitions required by § 9701.211 and § 9701.212 to assign jobs to an appropriate occupational cluster and band.
( c ) DHS must establish procedures for classifying jobs and may make such inquiries or investigations of the duties, responsibilities, and qualification requirements of jobs as it considers necessary for the purpose of this section.
( d ) Classification decisions become effective on the date designated by the authorized agency official who makes the decision.
( e ) DHS must establish a plan to periodically review the accuracy of classification decisions.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2302

To extend for an additional six months the period for which chapter 12 

of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2003

Ms. BALDWIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To extend for an additional six months the period for which 

chapter 12 of title 11 of the United States Code is reenacted.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection of Family 

5 Farmers Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD 

7 FOR WHICH CHAPTER 12 OF TITLE 11, 

8 UNITED STATES CODE, IS REENACTED. 

9 (a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 149 of title I of division 

10 C of Public Law 105–277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note), as most 
2

•HR 2302 IH 

1 recently amended by section 2 of Public Law 107–377 

2 (116 Stat. 3115), is further amended—

3 (1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2003’’ each place it ap4 pears and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2004’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (a)—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘June 30, 2003’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2003’’ and in9 serting ‘‘July 1, 2003’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall take effect as of July 1, 2003.

Æ
### §108. Seven-year absence presumption of death

(a) No State law providing for presumption of death shall be applicable to claims for benefits under laws administered by the Secretary.

(b) If evidence satisfactory to the Secretary is submitted establishing the continued and unexplained absence of any individual from that individual's home and family for seven or more years, and establishing that after diligent search no evidence of that individual's existence after the date of disappearance has been found or received, the death of such individual as of the date of the expiration of such period shall be considered as sufficiently proved.

(c) Except in a suit brought pursuant to section 1984 of this title, the finding of death made by the Secretary shall be final and conclusive.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1112; Pub. L. 99–576, title VII, §701(7), Oct. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 3291; Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(a)(1), (b)(1), (2)(E), 5(c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 403–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(1), substituted "administered by the Secretary" for "administered by the Veterans' Administration".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1984" for "784".

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

1986—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–576 substituted "that individual's" for "his" in two places.
§ 2.5 Adjudication and settlement of claims. ( a ) Upon receipt of a claim by the Assistant General Counsel for Finance and Litigation, the time and date of receipt shall be recorded. The Assistant General Counsel may, after recording the claim, transmit it to the Departmental office or primary operating unit involved in the claim and request that an investigation be conducted. The appropriate Departmental office or primary operating unit shall designate an official to conduct the investigation, who shall prepare a file, obtain additional information as necessary, and prepare for the Assistant General Counsel's signature a proposed award or denial of the claim. If the investigation capabilities of the office or unit are insufficient for a proper and complete investigation, the office or unit shall consult with the Departmental Office of Investigations and Security to: ( 1 ) Have that Office conduct the investigation or
( 2 ) Request another Federal agency to conduct the investigation as necessary, pursuant to § 14.8 of the regulations (28 CFR Part 14), all on a reimbursable basis.
( b ) If the amount of the proposed award exceeds $25,000 (in which case, approval by the Attorney General is required), or if consultation with the Department of Justice is desired or required pursuant to § 14.6 of the regulations, the Assistant General Counsel for Finance and Litigation will prepare and compile the material required by the Department of Justice under § 14.7 of the Regulations.
( c ) Denial of a claim shall be communicated as provided by § 14.9 of the regulations (28 CFR Part 14).
( d ) Designees hereunder are responsible for the control over and expeditious handling of claims, bearing in mind the applicable statutory time limitations for adjudications of claims.
[32 FR 3769, Mar. 7, 1967, as amended at 48 FR 31636, July 11, 1983; 63 FR 29945, June 2, 1998]
• Aerial Centrifugal Impeller Generation I (ACI Gen I) 

• 11 Apr 2012: ACI Gen I proof of concept achieved

• 15 Mar, 2013: ACI patent application submitted

• Grandfather protections ensured under first to invent patent rules

• Mohyi Labs is on the cusp of delivering ACI Generation II 

(ACI Gen II) bladeless technology that is capable of 

accomplishing a wide cross-section of missions within 

aerospace and sub-aquatic environments 

• In sub-aquatic environments, cavitation is alleviated

• No “rotating razor blades” means safer operations, derisking personal injury and collateral damage threat

Mohyi Labs UAS Bladeless Concept

10/26/2015 1

ACI Gen II

ACI Gen I Early Prototype
Fully Assembled
Bottom View 

Assembled
§ 25.9 Answer. ( a ) The respondent may request a hearing by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer shall be deemed to be a request for hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the respondent— ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the respondent intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the respondent contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the respondent to act as respondent's representative, if any.
### **CHAPTER 25—PRESIDENT'S COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES**

Sec.
2501.
Acceptance of voluntary services and money or property.
2502.
Authorization of appropriations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Page 9 of 18

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

JPMorgan Chase Bank                     Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126          fka Bankers Trust Company
Chicago, IL 60670                       60 Wall Street, 26th Floor-MS NYC60-2606
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration    New York, NY 10007
Phone: (312) 407-0192                   Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Fax:   (312) 407-1708                         Structured Finance
                                        Phone: (212) 250-8522
                                        Fax:   (212) 797-8606

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44114
ATTN: President, KER
Phone: (216) 828-4293
Fax:   (216) 828-9301

Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller and Administrator, KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999-A, as Issuer, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, as Servicer
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, successor in interest to Bank One, National
Association, successor in interest to The First National Bank of Chicago, not in
its individual capacity but solely as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of
January 1, 1999 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a
review of the activities of PHEAA as Servicer from January 1, 2003, through
December 31, 2003, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and
(ii) to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on the review, PHEAA as
Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such
period.

The undersigned also hereby certifies that PHEAA has disclosed to the
Administrator and to the Trust's certified public accountants all significant
deficiencies relating to PHEAA's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
in accordance with a review conducted in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar standard as set forth in the
Agreement.

                                        PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
                                        ASSISTANCE AGENCY, Servicer

Date: February 24, 2004                 By:  /S/ RICHARD E. WILLEY
                                        --------------------------
                                        Name: Richard E. Willey
                                        Title: President and CEO