alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Enclosure 7: NEI Handouts

Meeting Summary of July 28, 2010 

Public Meeting with NEI

Dated August 4, 2010
NEI HANDOUT AT 28 JUL 2010 PUBLIC MEETING 

ACTION TABLE 

DRAFT 

Improvement Opportunity Recommended 

Action

Trends noted in monitoring panel and SLT that do not constitute a 

significant concern but need to be addressed

Directed training, 

communication, etc.

A significant immediate indication of declining safety culture 

performance in a department (e.g., issue with supervisors in the 

department) 

ACE or CCE required

A significant immediate indication of declining safety culture 

performance at the station (e.g., issue with a department manager 

or senior manager) 

ACE, CCE, RCE, or 

NSCA required

An indication of a decline in safety culture over the last two quarters 

in a functional area (e.g., multiple ECP issues, emotional CRs, etc.)

ACE, CCE or RCE 

required

An indication of a declining trend over the last four quarters at the 

station (e.g., increase in allegations over historic averages, multiple 

Office of Investigation visits in an area)

RCE or NSCA required

A noticeable difference in a functional area from the remainder of 

the station culture (e.g., increase in CRs that are emotional, survey 

results indicate a measureable difference from the station norm, 

etc.)

ACE or RCE required

A continuing decline in the culture of a functional area or the station 

indicating corrective actions are ineffective (e.g., repetitive issues 

after corrective actions have been completed) 

ACE or RCE required

Indications of a return of a previously addressed issue indicating 

corrective actions were not durable (e.g., return of similar issues to 

issues addressed two or more years ago and believed corrected) 

RCE or NSCA required

Request from NRC due to their lack of confidence in site’s ability to 

identify and/or correct longstanding cultural issue. 

Independent NSCA 

required

Recommendation from external safety board to conduct 

independent or third party assessment.

Independent or third 

party NSCA required

Request from NRC to conduct assessment due to station being 

placed in column four of the action matrix.

Third party NSCA 

required

Note: ACE= Apparent Cause Evaluation; CCE= Common Cause Evaluation, RCE=Root 

Cause Evaluation; NSCA= Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment
§ 842.610 Changes of election after final adjudication. ( a ) Except as provided in § 842.611, § 842.612, or paragraph (b) of this section, an employee or Member may not revoke or change the election or name another survivor later than 30 days after the date of the first regular monthly payment.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in § 842.605 and paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, a retiree who was married at the time of retirement and has elected a self-only annuity, a one-half reduced annuity to provide a current spouse annuity, a fully reduced annuity or a one-half reduced annuity to provide a former spouse annuity, or an insurable interest rate may elect, no later than 18 months after the time of retirement, an annuity reduction or an increased annuity reduction to provide a current spouse annuity.
( 2 ) A current spouse annuity based on an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section cannot be paid if it will, when combined with any former spouse annuity or annuities that are required by court order, exceed the maximum survivor annuity permitted under § 842.613.
( 3 ) To make an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the retiree must pay, in full no later than 18 months after the time of retirement, a deposit equal to the sum of the monthly differences between the annuity paid to the retiree and the annuity that would have been paid if the additional annuity reduction elected under paragraph (b)(1) of this section had been in effect since the time of retirement, plus— ( i ) If the election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section changes the annuity from a self only annuity to a fully reduced annuity, 24.5 percent of the retiree's annual annuity, plus 6 percent interest on both; or
( ii ) If the election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section changes the annuity from a self only annuity to a one-half reduced annuity or from a one-half reduced annuity to a fully reduced annuity, 12.25 percent of the retiree's annual annuity, plus 6 percent interest on both.
( 4 ) If a retiree makes an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section and is prevented from paying the deposit within the 18-month time limit because OPM did not send him or her a notice of the amount of the deposit at least 30 days before the time limit expires, the time limit for making the deposit will be extended 30 days after OPM sends the notice of the amount of the deposit.
( 5 ) An election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section cancels any spousal consent under § 842.603.
( 6 ) An election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is void unless filed with OPM before the retiree dies.
( 7 ) If a retiree who had elected a fully reduced annuity or a one-half reduced annuity to provide a former spouse annuity (or annuities) makes an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section which would cause the combined current spouse annuity and former spouse annuity (or annuities) to exceed the maximum allowed under § 842.613, the former spouse annuity (or annuities) must be reduced to not exceed the maximum allowable under § 842.613.
[52 FR 2061, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 65419, Dec. 17, 1991; 57 FR 54680, Nov. 20, 1992]
# Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the “Act”) (50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the Act, that the domestic production capability for precursor materials for munitions is essential to the national defense.

Without Presidential action under section 303 of the Act, United States industry cannot reasonably be expected to provide the production capability for precursor materials for munitions adequately and in a timely manner. Further, purchases, purchase commitments, or other action pursuant to section 303 of the Act are the most cost-effective, expedient, and practical alternative method for meeting the need for this critical capability.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register.*

[FR Doc. 2019-00100

Billing code 5001-06-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2354

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the allowance for burial 

expenses of certain veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2003

Mr. CASE (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Mr. GIBBONS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

allowance for burial expenses of certain veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Veterans Ceme5 tery Fairness Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF ALLOWANCE FOR THE PLOT ALLOW7 ANCE OF CERTAIN VETERANS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2303(b)(1)(A) of title 38, 

9 United States Code, is amended by inserting after ‘‘$300’’ 

10 the following: ‘‘(or the lesser of the actual costs or $750 
2

•HR 2354 IH 

1 in the case of a State in which ground burial in a national 

2 cemetery is not available)’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to deaths occurring on or after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. II-09-062 October 30, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC BANS FORMER FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT 

SECURITY OFFICER FROM NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITIES 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order to Robert Robbirds banning 

him from involvement in NRC-licensed activities for three years. Robbirds is a former security 

officer at the Farley nuclear power plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company near 

Columbia, Ala. about 18 miles south of Dothan. 

Earlier this year, the NRC completed an investigation that reviewed a June 2008 incident 

where Robbirds consumed alcohol before arriving for work, and entered the plant with alcohol in 

water bottles. After Robbirds had been on duty as an armed responder for five to six hours, he 

was found by plant employees to be unresponsive and not fit for duty. 

“The actions of this former officer demonstrated a complete lack of regard for his duties 

and NRC requirements,” said NRC Region II Deputy Administrator for Operations Victor 

McCree. “Fortunately, no actual security events occurred during that time, but the NRC takes 

any degradation in security very seriously.” 

In addition to the three-year prohibition, Robbirds must notify the NRC during the year 

following that period if he accepts employment involving NRC-licensed activities. Robbirds has 

20 days to either request an extension or a hearing before the imposition of the order. 

 

Southern Nuclear was also cited for a violation, but the company acknowledged the 

seriousness of the officer’s actions and took steps to correct the violation and prevent recurrence. 

Because the company identified the issue and took corrective actions, the NRC is not proposing a 

fine, but the violation could result in increased inspections. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:See attached file(s)

? U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule grid

? U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule

? No Comment
# L_2017161EN.01002101.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 245/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1034]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/208 of 8 December 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle functional safety requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/208 of 8 December 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle functional safety requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 40a (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1322/2014) of Chapter II of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘41. | 32015 R 0208: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/208 of 8 December 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to vehicle functional safety requirements for the approval of agricultural and forestry vehicles (OJ L 42, 17.2.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘41.

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/208 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 42, 17.2.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Joseph L. Guzzetta, Jr., Appellant, v. Lillian W. Guzzetta, Respondent.

Memorandum: We find only questions of fact presented by the record which we feel the Special Term correctly resolved. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in an action for an annulment, and granting custody of infant child to defendant.) Present — Taylor, P; J., MeCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ. [See *post,*p. 844.]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Eduardo Avila, Chief Financial Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc. for the period ended November 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.

Dated: January 13, 2006

/s/ Eduardo AvilaEduardo Avila
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
exv10w66



 





Exhibit 10.66




AMENDMENT

TO

EXCHANGE RIGHTS AGREEMENT

(CLASS B OPERATING PARTNERSHIP UNITS)




          Amendment, dated as of December 17, 2003 (this “Amendment”), to Exchange
Rights Agreement dated as of January 2, 1998, among Starwood Hotels & Resorts
Worldwide, Inc. (the “Corporation”), SLC Operating Limited Partnership (the
“Operating Partnership”) and certain limited partners of the Operating
Partnership (the “Agreement”). All capitalized terms used in this First
Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings
assigned thereto in the Agreement.



          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has determined that it
is advisable and in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders
to exercise the Corporation’s right pursuant to Section 2(c) of the Agreement
to modify the right to exchange Class B OP Units pursuant to the Agreement, and
the amendment thereto, dated October 10, 2002, as set forth in this Amendment
to extend the period of time during which the holders of Class B OP Units can
exchange such units for Class B EPS.



          NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation agrees, for its benefit and the benefit of
the holders of Class B OP Units, as follows:




	 	1.	 	Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 2(a) of the
Agreement or in the form of Letter of Transmittal attached thereto as
Exhibit A to the contrary, a holder of Class B OP Units may make a
Class B EPS Request in a Letter of Transmittal delivered to the Trust
after the Cross-Over Date and on or prior to January 2, 2005.
	 
	 	2.	 	Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and
shall be unmodified by the effectiveness of this Amendment.





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. has
adopted this Amendment as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Kenneth S. Siegel
	

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary
Agency Spotlight

----

**November 1998**
Export-Import (Ex-Im) Bank  Ex-Im Bank's new exposure fee system went into effect on October1, 1998.  This fee system is consistent with the agreement on export credit premium ratesnegotiatedamong the OECD countries.  The new exposure fee includes five variables: country risk level,percentof cover, products offered, length of drawdown period, and length of repayment period.  Thebank'sweb site (http://www.exim.gov) provides an Exposure Fee Calculator to assist customers indetermining proposed exposure fees under the new system.  The bank also provides free diskettescontaining the calculator, as well as a seminar on the new system.  For more information, call Ex-ImBank at 1-800-565-3946.
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)   DOE is hosting the first-ever U.S.- Ukraine Conference onNuclear Trade and Cooperation.  Sponsored in cooperation with several U.S. agencies, theconference will be held on November 9 and 10, 1998, in Washington, D.C.  The goal is promoteopportunities for nuclear commerce between Ukraine and the United States.  Ukrainian industryrepresentatives will present products and technologies to U.S. businesses interested in establishingcommercial relationsips with Ukrainian firms.  A follow-on conference is planned for spring 1999inUkraine.  For more information and to register for the conference, visithttp://insp.pnl.gov:2080/?reports/ukuscon/background on the Internet, or contact JenniferCarpenterby telephone at (509) 372-4139 or by e-mail at [email protected]. 
***This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the NewlyIndependent States (BISNIS)***
NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR PLANT 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Heather Jones as the new resident inspector at the Vermont 

Yankee nuclear power plant in Vernon, Vt. She joins NRC Acting Senior 

Resident Inspector Dave Spindler at the plant, which is operated by Entergy 

Nuclear Operations, Inc. 

 Jones joined the agency’s Region I office in 2005 after earning a 

bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of Arizona 

and a master’s degree in chemical engineering from the University of 

Pittsburgh. She is a graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a 

two-year training program that provides specialized training in nuclear safety and a broad 

perspective of NRC regulatory activities. Jones also completed a rigorous NRC inspector 

qualification program. Most recently, she was assigned as a reactor inspector in the Region I 

Division of Reactor Safety, performing engineering inspections. 

 “Heather Jones has the training and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry 

out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and ensure the safe operation of 

Vermont Yankee,” said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can be assigned to 

any one site for up to seven years. 

 

The Vermont Yankee resident inspectors can be reached at 802/257-4319. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. I-09-033 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

June 16, 2009 

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov
UNITED STATES 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-001 

 

 

 

June 18, 2009 

FOR THE RECORD 

DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING ASSURANCE

We would like to ensure that NRC requirements for funding eventual decommissioning 

of nuclear power plants are properly understood. The agency’s regular analysis of plants’ 

decommissioning funding plans includes a conservative growth estimate to account for inflation 

and market instability. The NRC’s analysis disregards unsupported hopes for better market 

performance or expectations for reactor license renewals. The NRC is also prepared to require 

additional contributions to decommissioning funds or other acceptable financial mechanisms if 

our analysis indicates possible shortfalls. Decommissioning funds are separate from other plant 

assets and are protected by law for cleanup activities only – a plant operator cannot “walk away” 

from its responsibilities to return a site to an acceptable state. 

There may also be some confusion about NRC requirements for proper maintenance of 

permanently closed plants under the SAFESTOR concept. Any plant that chooses that option 

must continue to monitor and maintain the plant to meet safety regulations, as well as mount an 

effective defense against threats to any spent nuclear fuel on-site. The NRC inspects 

permanently shut-down plants to ensure they meet these requirements until the site is cleaned up. 

NRC regulations prohibit SAFESTOR plants from doing anything which would prevent release 

of the site for future use, cause any new significant environmental impacts, or that could lead to 

insufficient decommissioning funds. In order for the NRC to terminate a plant operator’s 

obligations at a site, the cleanup must meet explicit standards for future use such that the public 

or workers would remain safe.
#### § 9301.1 In general.

This information is furnished for the guidance of the public and in compliance with the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended. This subpart should be read in conjunction with the FOIA. The Freedom of Information Act applies to third-party requests for documents concerning the general activities of the government and of SIGAR in particular. When a U.S. citizen or an individual lawfully admitted for permanent residence requests access to his or her own records, it is considered a Privacy Act request. Such records are maintained by SIGAR under the individual's name or personal identifier. Although requests are considered either FOIA requests for Privacy Act requests, agencies process requests in accordance with both laws, which provides the greatest degree of lawful access while safeguarding an individual's privacy.

[77 FR 38171, June 27, 2012]
No. II-09-056 October 16, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT NFS 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting for 

Thursday, Oct. 29, to discuss various topics involving the Nuclear Fuel Services facility in 

Erwin, Tenn. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. in the Erwin Town Hall Meeting Room, 211 

N. Main Ave., in Erwin. 

 The meeting is being held to answer questions about the site, many of which were raised 

by citizens during a May NRC public meeting in Erwin. The NRC staff has reviewed those 

questions and will provide responses at the meeting. 

There will also be an opportunity for citizens to ask NRC staff additional questions 

regarding the agency’s oversight and regulatory activities at NFS, including recent performance 

and future NRC inspection and oversight plans. 

 

###

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov