5796 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2004 / Proposed Rules 

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 

regulatory evaluation prepared for this 

action is contained in the Rules Docket. 

A copy of it may be obtained by 

contacting the Rules Docket at the 

location provided under the caption 

ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the Federal Aviation 

Administration proposes to amend part 

39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. Section 39.13 is amended by 

adding the following new airworthiness 

directive:

Airbus: Docket 2002–NM–278–AD.

Applicability: Model A319 and A320 series 

airplanes, certificated in any category; except 

those on which Airbus Modification 31888 

has been accomplished. 

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless 

accomplished previously. 

To reduce the potential for electrical arcing 

within the fuel tank due to insufficient 

electrical bonding, which could result in a 

fire or explosion in the fuel tank, accomplish 

the following: 

Modification of Electrical Bonding 

(a) Within 60 months after the effective 

date of this AD, modify the electrical bonding 

of the fuel return line in each wing between 

ribs 7 and 8, by installing a grounding tag to 

a certain check valve attachment bolt; 

installing bonding leads between the check 

valve, the fuel return line, and the adjacent 

rib 8; and performing an electrical bonding 

resistance test; per the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–

28–1103, Revision 01, dated April 1, 2003. If 

the electrical resistance test of any bonding 

lead fails: Before further flight, disassemble 

the bonding lead, repeat the applicable 

cleaning procedures, reassemble the bonding 

lead, and repeat the electrical resistance test 

per the Accomplishment Instructions of the 

service bulletin. 

Credit for Actions Accomplished Previously 

(b) Actions accomplished before the 

effective date of this AD per Airbus Service 

Bulletin A320–28–1103, dated June 14, 2002, 

are acceptable for compliance with the 

corresponding actions required by paragraph 

(a) of this AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(c) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, is 

authorized to approve alternative methods of 

compliance for this AD.

Note 1: The subject of this AD is addressed 

in French airworthiness directive 2002–

476(B), dated September 18, 2002.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

29, 2004. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 04–2483 Filed 2–5–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Part 990 

[Docket No. FR–4874–C–03] 

Operating Fund Program; Notice of 

Intent To Establish a Negotiated 

Rulemaking Committee and Notice of 

First Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Public and Indian 

Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Correction.

SUMMARY: On January 28, 2004, HUD 

published a notice announcing its intent 

to establish a negotiated rulemaking 

advisory committee under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act. The purpose 

of the Committee is to provide advice 

and recommendations on developing a 

rule for effectuating changes to the 

Public Housing Operating Fund 

Program in response to the Harvard 

University Graduate School of Design’s 

‘‘Public Housing Operating Cost Study.’’

Among other information, the January 

28, 2004, notice contains a list of the 

proposed committee members, and 

solicits public comment on the 

proposed membership of the committee. 

The list of committee members contains 

a typographical error. Specifically, the 

January 28, 2004, notice incorrectly 

identifies the location of the Alameda 

County Housing Authority as Alameda, 

California. The housing authority is 

located in the city of Hayward, 

California. This document makes the 

necessary correction.

DATES: Comment Due Date: The due 

date for public comments provided in 

the January 28, 2004, notice is 

unchanged. Comments on the 

committee and its proposed 

membership are due on or before: 

February 27, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

the committee and its proposed 

members to the Regulations Division, 

Office of General Counsel, Room 10276, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20410–0500. 

Comments or any other communications 

submitted should consist of an original 

and four copies and refer to the above 

docket number and title. Facsimile 

(FAX) comments are not acceptable. The 

docket will be available for public 

inspection and copying between 8 a.m. 

and 5 p.m. weekdays at the above 

address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chris Kubacki, Director, Funding and 

Financial Management Division, Public 

and Indian Housing—Real Estate 

Assessment Center, Suite 800, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 1280 Maryland Ave., 

SW., Washington, DC 20024–2135; 

telephone (202) 708–4932 (this 

telephone number is not toll-free). 

Individuals with speech or hearing 

impairments may access this number 

through TTY by calling the toll-free 

Federal Information Relay Service at 1–

800–877–8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 28, 2004 (69 FR 4212), HUD 

published a notice announcing its intent 

to establish a negotiated rulemaking 

advisory committee under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act. The purpose 

of the Committee is to provide advice 

and recommendations on developing a 

rule for effectuating changes to the 

Public Housing Operating Fund 

Program in response to the Harvard 

University Graduate School of Design’s 

‘‘Public Housing Operating Cost Study.’’

Among other information, the January 

28, 2004, notice contains a list of the 

proposed committee members, and 

solicits public comment on the 

proposed membership of the committee. 

The list of committee members contains 

a typographical error. Specifically, the 

January 28, 2004, notice incorrectly 

identifies the location of the Alameda 

County Housing Authority as Alameda, 

California. The housing authority is 

located in the city of Hayward, 

California. This document makes the 

necessary correction. 

For the convenience of readers, HUD 

is republishing the complete list of 

committee members, including the 

corrected location of the Alameda 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2004 / Proposed Rules 5797

County Housing Authority. The list of 

proposed committee members is as 

follows: 

Housing Agencies 

1. Atlanta Housing Authority, Atlanta, 

GA 

2. New York City Housing Authority, 

NYC, NY 

3. Puerto Rico Housing Authority, San 

Juan, PR 

4. Chicago Housing Authority, Chicago, 

IL 

5. Dallas Housing Authority, Dallas, TX 

6. Anne Arundel Housing Authority, 

Anne Arundel, MD 

7. Indianapolis Housing Authority, 

Indianapolis, IN 

8. Albany Housing Authority, Albany, 

NY 

9. Jackson Housing Authority, Jackson, 

MS 

10. Boise City/Ada County Housing 

Authority, Boise City, ID 

11. Reno Housing Authority, Reno, NV 

12. Alameda County Housing Authority, 

Hayward, CA 

13. Athens Housing Authority, Athens, 

GA 

14. Housing Authority of East Baton 

Rouge, Baton Rouge, LA 

15. Housing Authority of the City of 

Montgomery, Montgomery, AL 

Tenant Organizations 

1. Jack Cooper, Massachusetts Union of 

Public Housing Tenants, Needham, 

MA 

Other Interests/Policy Groups 

1. Ned Epstein, Housing Partners, Inc. 

2. Howard Husock, Director of Kennedy 

School Case Program 

3. Greg Byrne, Project Director for 

Harvard Cost Study 

4. Dan Anderson, Bank of America 

5. David Land, Lindsey and Company 

6. Council of Large Public Housing 

Agencies 

7. National Association of Housing and 

Redevelopment Officials 

8. Public Housing Authorities Directors 

Association 

9. National Organization of African 

Americans in Housing 

Federal Government 

1. Assistant Secretary Michael Liu, U.S. 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development 

2. Deputy Assistant Secretary William 

Russell, U.S. Department of Housing 

and Urban Development

Dated: January 30, 2004. 

William O. Russell III, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Public 

Housing and Voucher Programs.

[FR Doc. 04–2543 Filed 2–5–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–33–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

[REG–160330–02] 

RIN 1545–BB65 

Section 704(c), Installment Obligations 

and Contributed Contracts; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed 

rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (REG–106330–02) that was 

published in the Federal Register on 

Monday, November 24, 2003 (68 FR 

65864). These proposed regulations 

relate to the tax treatment of installment 

obligations and property acquired 

pursuant to a contract under sections 

704(c) and 737.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher L. Trump, (202) 622–3070 

(not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This notice of proposed rulemaking 

that is the subject of this correction is 

under sections 704(c) and 737 of the 

Internal Revenue Code. 

Need for Correction 

As published REG–160330–02 contain 

errors which may prove to be 

misleading and are in need of 

clarification. 

Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the 

notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–

160330–02), which is the subject of FR 

Doc. 03–29323, is corrected as follows: 

1. On page 65865, column 2, under 

the paragraph heading ‘‘Part 1—

INCOME TAXES’’, Par. 2 amendatory 

instruction 6a, line four, the language 

‘‘paragraphs (a)(8)(ii), and (a)(8)(ii) and’’

is corrected to read ‘‘paragraphs 

(a)(8)(ii), and (a)(8)(iii) and’’.

§ 1.704–4 [Corrected] 

2. On page 65865, column 3, § 1.704–

4, paragraph (g) Effective date, line four 

the language ‘‘except that paragraphs 

(d)(1)(i) and (ii)’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘except that paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and 

(iii)’’.

§ 1.737–5 [Corrected] 

3. On page 65866, column 1, § 1.737–

5 under the section heading, § 1.737–5 

Effective dates., line five, the language 

‘‘2(d)(3)(ii) and (ii) apply to 

distributions’’ is corrected to read 

‘‘2(d)(3)(ii) and (iii) apply to 

distributions’’.

Cynthia Grigsby, 

Acting Chief, Publications and Regulations 

Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate 

Chief Counsel (Procedures and 

Administration).

[FR Doc. 04–2502 Filed 2–5–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM

32 CFR Parts 1602, 1605, 1609 and 

1656 

RIN 3240–AA01 

Alternative Service Worker Appeals of 

Denied Job Reassignments

AGENCY: Selective Service System.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: The Selective Service System 

(SSS) proposes to amend its regulations 

regarding the procedures for 

conscientious objectors, who have been 

placed in the Alternative Service 

Program as Alternative Service Workers 

(ASW), to appeal denied requests for job 

reassignments during a military draft. 

Civilian Review Boards (CRB), whose 

sole responsibility is to decide ASW 

appeals of denied job reassignments, 

would be abolished with their 

responsibilities transferred to the more 

numerous District Appeal Boards 

(DAB). Under existing regulations, the 

sole responsibility of DABs is to decide 

appeals of local board classification 

decisions. This organization change is 

necessary to ensure a more efficient and 

economical administration of the SSS. 

Its primary intended effect is to 

eliminate the administrative costs of 

maintaining separate appeal boards for 

ASWs without adversely impacting on 

the Agency’s ability to expeditiously 

decide appeals of denied job 

reassignments or appeals of local board 

classification decisions. A secondary 

intended effect is to improve customer 

service to ASWs during a military draft.

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 6, 2004.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• E-mail: information@sss.gov

• Mail: Rudy G. Sanchez, Jr., Office of 

the General Counsel, Selective Service 

System, Arlington, VA 22209–2425.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: