alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00329]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Oncology 1--Basic Translational Integrated 
Review Group; Tumor Progression and Metastasis Study Section.
    Date: February 13-14, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bahia Resort Hotel, 998 West Mission Bay Drive, San 
Diego, CA 92109.
    Contact Person: Rolf Jakobi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 6187, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-495-
1718, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1cbc0cacec3c8d3e1ccc0c8cd8fcfc8c98fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7bdb6bcb8b5bea597bab6bebbf9b9bebff9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2019.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00329 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §30712. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be used by the board of directors for the purpose stated in section 30702 of this title or be transferred to a recognized educational foundation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1324.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30712 | 36:515. | July 19, 1954, ch. 536, §15, 68 Stat. 492. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Southwest Research Institute: Clean Diesel IV

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 6, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research 
Institute: Clean Diesel IV (``SWRI'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission Disclosing changes in its membership status. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ArvinMeritor, 
Inc., Troy, MI; Dayco Fluid Technologies SPA, Torino, Italy; Denso 
Corporation, Kariya City, Japan; Nippon Soken, Nishio City, Japan; 
Renault Car, Cedex, France; and Total France, Cedex, France have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SWRI intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 6, 2004, SWRI: Clean Diesel IV filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on May 10, 2004 (69 FR 25923).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 18, 
2004. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 15, 2004 (69 FR 33417).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25082 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 1850.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
#### § 919.135 May the OPM exclude a person who is not currently participating in a nonprocurement transaction?

Given a cause that justifies an exclusion under this part, we may exclude any person who has been involved, is currently involved, or may reasonably be expected to be involved in a covered transaction.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—GENERAL PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–183, §102(a)(1), Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2653, redesignated former subchapter III of this chapter as this subchapter.
No. 14-0258 – David Ragonese v. Racing Corporation of West Virginia, d/b/a Mardi Gras Casino and Resort 

### FILED February 12, 2015 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA Benjamin, Justice, concurring:

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that factual questions exist as to whether the
petitioner, David Ragonese, was a trespasser at the time he was injured. These factual
uncertainties preclude summary judgment on the issue of trespass.

Upon remand, should the fact-finder determine that Mr. Ragonese was not a trespasser, this Court’s recent opinion, Hersh v. E-T Enterprises, Limited Partnership , 232 W. Va. 305, 752 S.E.2d 336 (2013), will control in determining the liability of the
respondent, Racing Corporation of West Virginia, d/b/a Mardi Gras Casino and Resort
(“Mardi Gras Casino”). In syllabus point 6 of Hersh , the Court abolished the open and
obvious doctrine in premises liability negligence actions. Justice Loughry and I dissented

in Hersh because we believe the open and obvious doctrine embodied in the law
traditional concepts of personal responsibility and because application of the open and
obvious doctrine acted to prevent frivolous law suits proceeding past the summary
judgment phase. I write separately in the present case to reaffirm the position of Justice
Loughry and myself in Hersh : By eliminating the open and obvious doctrine, this Court
has fundamentally damaged the means by which premises liability cases proceed through
our judicial system.
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alexander International, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Tsuida, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of March 2003.


/s/ Robert Tsuida
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
BELARUS' NEW CUSTOMS CODE CAME INTOEFFECT JULY 16, 1998

----

27 JUL 1998
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2) Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November
      16, 2009
              
              /s/
      B.J. SparksB.J.
      SparksChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### §1743. Applications

Payments on account of any veteran cared for in a State home shall be made under this subchapter only from the date the Secretary receives a request for determination of such veteran's eligibility; however, if such request is received by the Secretary within ten days after care of such veteran begins, payments shall be made on account of such veteran from the date care began.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1147, §643; Pub. L. 97–251, §7, Sept. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 716; renumbered §1743 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 1743 was renumbered section 3543 of this title.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 643 of this title as this section and substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" in two places.

1982—Pub. L. 97–251 struck out "of any war" after "Payments on account of any veteran".
### §984a. Repealed. June 28, 1955, ch. 189, §12(c)(11), 69 Stat. 181

Section, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 935, ch. VIII, §801, 68 Stat. 818, authorized Administrator to place not more than four positions in grades 16, 17, or 18 of General Schedule established by Classification Act of 1949.
No. 41,498

#### Pan American Petroleum Corporation, a Corporation, Appellee, v. Cities Service Gas Company, a Corporation, *Appellant.*

(341 P. 2d 1012)

Opinion filed July 10, 1959.

*Willard N. Van Slyck, Jr.,*of Topeka, and *Sam Riggs,*of Liberal, argued the cause, and C. C. *Mount, O. R. Stites, Joe Rolston*and *Charles V. Wheeler,*of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, *Clayton E. Kline,*of Topeka, and *Ronald Kaarbo,*of Liberal, were with them on the briefs for the appellant.

*George C. Spradling,*of Wichita, argued the cause, and *W.*W. *Heard*and *John F. Jones,*of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and *Charles Vance,*of Liberal, were with him on the brief for the appellee.

*316The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This is another appeal involving the construction of G. S. 1949, 7-104 relative to the appearance in Kansas courts of lawyers from other states.

Rriefly, the record discloses that Mr. George C. Spradling, a regularly admitted and practicing lawyer of this state, with law offices in Wichita, Sedgwick county, prepared, signed and filed before the district court of Seward county a petition on behalf of plaintiff, associating with him as attorneys for plaintiff certain Oklahoma lawyers. Not only did Mr. Spradling personally sign the petition, but he also, alone, signed the praecipes for summons. Subsequently, defendant filed its motion to strike the petition on the ground there had been no compliance with section 7-104. From an order of the trial court overruling the motion, defendant appeals.

Mr. Spradling, as a regularly practicing member of the bar of this state, needed no associate counsel, either foreign or local, to enable him to file a lawsuit in Seward county on behalf of his client. G. S. 1949, 7-104 has no application to such a member when filing a petition on behalf of a client in any of the courts of this state, and the fact that Mr. Spradling did associate foreign counsel with himself does not alter the situation.

No useful purpose would be served by prolonging the discussion in this case. Suffice it to say that the same questions were presented and considered in our recent case of *Slayman v. Steinhoff,*185 Kan. 88, 340 P. 2d 98, and what was said there is sufficient to affirm the judgment of the trial court in this case. It is so ordered.
*** MEDIA ADVISORY *** 

NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO 

TO SPEAK AT THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION 

NRC Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko will speak Tuesday, July 7, at 10 a.m. at the Heritage 

Foundation in Washington, D.C. Jaczko, whose agency oversees commercial nuclear reactors 

and other civilian uses of radioactive materials, will discuss his regulatory agenda. 

Now serving in his second term as an NRC Commissioner, Jaczko was selected as 

Chairman by President Obama on May 13. He was first nominated and confirmed to a seat on the 

Commission in 2005 and began serving a second term in 2008. As Chairman, Jaczko serves as 

the principal executive officer of the nearly 4,000-strong agency, and also serves as its official 

spokesman. He has focused his efforts on the NRC being a decisive safety regulator, and his 

interests have ranged from strengthening reactor security regulations, particularly protections 

against an aircraft crash, to improving agency communications. 

For additional biographical information, please click on: 

http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/organization/commission/jaczko.html. 

Chairman Jaczko's remarks will be webcast on the Heritage Foundation web site. To 

view the broadcast, go to http://www.heritage.org, click on “Upcoming Heritage Events” section 

reference to his speech, and that will take you to a page with a direct link to the live remarks. The 

speech will also be archived on the Foundation website. 

The Heritage Foundation is located at 214 Mass. Ave., N.E., Washington, D.C. 

Please RSVP to http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev070709a.cfm. 

Contacts: 

NRC: Eliot Brenner, 301-415-8200 

Heritage: Matt Streit, 202-608-6156 

Press Release No. 09-122 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

July 6, 2009
### §3100. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are to provide for all services and assistance necessary to enable veterans with service-connected disabilities to achieve maximum independence in daily living and, to the maximum extent feasible, to become employable and to obtain and maintain suitable employment.

(Added Pub. L. 96–466, title I, §101(a), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2172, §1500; renumbered §3100, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1500 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 96–466, title VIII, §802(a)(1)–(5), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2217, provided that:

"(a)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) of section 101 [enacting this chapter] shall become effective on April 1, 1981.

"(2) The provisions of sections 1508, 1512, 1516, 1518, 1519, 1520, and 1521 [now 3108, 3112, 3116, 3118, 3119, 3120, and 3121] of title 38, United States Code, as added by section 101(a), shall become effective on October 1, 1980.

"(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the provisions of chapter 31 of title 38, United States Code, as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1980] (other than section 1504, relating to subsistence allowances, and section 1507, relating to loans [former sections 1504 and 1507 of this title, respectively]), shall continue in effect until March 31, 1981.

"(4) Effective on October 1, 1980, sections 1504 and 1507 [former sections 1504 and 1507 of this title] are repealed. During the period beginning on October 1, 1980, and ending on March 31, 1981, the provisions of sections 1508 and 1512 [now 3108 and 3112] of title 38, United States Code, as added by section 101(a), shall apply to veterans pursuing a program of vocational rehabilitation training under chapter 31 of such title in the same manner as sections 1504 and 1507 of such title, respectively, applied to veterans pursuing a program of vocational rehabilitation training under such chapter on September 30, 1980.

"(5) Subsection (c) of section 101 [enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3108 of this title] shall become effective on October 1, 1980. Subsection (d) of such section [enacting provisions set out as a note under section 3107 of this title] shall become effective on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1980]."
#### § 831.102 Basic records.

Every Federal department, agency, corporation or branch, whether executive, legislative, or judicial, and the District of Columbia Government (included in this part collectively in the term department or agency) having employees or Members of Congress (hereinafter referred to in this part as Members) subject to subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code, shall initiate and maintain retirement accounts for those employees and Members as prescribed by OPM issuances.

[33 FR 12498, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 66 FR 66711, Dec. 27, 2001]
§ 1180.4 Preparing a product for transfer. ( a ) Every final STEI product or summary shall, to the extent practicable, be prepared in a format that is consistent with one of the various formats found in NTIS guidelines. In addition, every such product shall— ( 1 ) Be accompanied by a report documentation page (SF 298) or its electronic equivalent;
( 2 ) Be in a form capable of high quality reproduction appropriate to the medium;
( 3 ) In the case of software, be accompanied by relevant documentation, such as operating manuals, but not including printed source code; and
( 4 ) In the case of a product not printed by the Government Printing Office, be accompanied by a statement as to whether the product has been made available for depository distribution by the Government Printing Office.
( b ) Each federal agency shall transfer or have transferred to NTIS those STEI products funded by it that are protected by copyright only if there is a license reserved to the Government. In such cases, the agency shall inform NTIS of the terms of the license. Suggested language for inclusion in agency funding instruments is contained in the Appendix to this part.
( c ) If an agency has generated or funded an STEI product which should be available for public dissemination but has embedded within it any copyrighted material, the designated liaison appointed pursuant to § 1180.8 should work with NTIS to determine if it would be appropriate to seek a license from the copyright holder in order to make the STEI product available.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 10, 2019

NO. 03-19-00549-CR

Cody James Kelley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Exhibit 32.1
------------


                             STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.
                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Stellar  Resources  Ltd.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31m 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Andrew Reid, Chief Executive Officer,  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained  byu the Company and  furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Andrew Reid
-----------------------
Andrew Reid
Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Ruth B. HOPPER et al., Appellees.

No. 11964.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 28, 1954.

Warren E. Burger, Washington, D. C., John C. Crawford, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

Spears, Reynolds, Moore & Rebman, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellees.

Before MILLER, Circuit Judge, and GOURLEY and STARR, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties ;

And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952, 122 F.Supp. 181, on appellant’s motion for summary judgment;

It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.
§ 848.901 Mentoring. ( a ) A phased retiree, other than an employee of the United States Postal Service, must spend at least 20 percent of his or her working hours in mentoring activities as defined by an authorized agency official. For purposes of this section, mentoring need not be limited to mentoring of an employee who is expected to assume the phased retiree's duties when the phased retiree fully retires.
( b ) An authorized agency official may waive the requirement under paragraph (a) of this section in the event of an emergency or other unusual circumstances (including active duty in the armed forces) that, in the authorized agency official's discretion, would make it impracticable for a phased retiree to fulfill the mentoring requirement.