alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 28, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 21, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service Contract 7 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2019-64, CP2019-69.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-28188 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
BUSINESS WEBSITES IN KAZAKHSTAN

----

**April 1998**
by Philip H. de Leon
Over the past 12 months, numerous websites containing useful commercial information have beenestablished in Kazakhstan. The following list is a selection of some of the most useful andinformative sites for anyone interested in investing in Kazakhstan.  All of them are regularlyupdated and free at the time this Bulletin is put to print.  (Note: this is not a comprehensive listand inclusion on it does not represent an endorsement by the U.S. Department ofCommerce.)
Securities Market and Privatization in the Republic of Kazakhstan   *www.kazecon.kz.* Information on the securities market and privatization projects is available from this website inEnglish and Russian.  This page was designed and is maintained by the U.S. Agency forInternational Development "Kazakhstan Securities Market Development Project."  The site alsoprovides access to a legal database and documents on investments.
Information Center of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan  *www.nationalbank.kz.*  This is the official, Russian-language website of the NationalBank of Kazakhstan (NBK).  Various NBK documents are available here, including the NBK'sweekly bulletin, which contains information on the Kazakhstani banking system and financialmarkets, as well as the normative and legal acts of the NBK regulating the banking system.
Panorama   *www.panorama.kz.*  One of Kazakhstan's leading weekly newspapers isavailable at this site.  Produced in Russian, this site covers a wide range of economic, political andsocial issues.
### §100104. Membership

A citizen of the United States who was honorably discharged from the Armed Forces is eligible for membership in the corporation. Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the bylaws.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1365.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100104 | 36:1705. | Nov. 20, 1981, Pub. L. 97–82, §5, 95 Stat. 1091. |

Section
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2034

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that an employer 

shall be liable for Social Security taxes on unreported tips paid to 

an employee only after the Internal Revenue Service establishes the 

amount of tips received by that employee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2003

Mr. HERGER (for himself and Mr. TANNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that an employer shall be liable for Social Security taxes 

on unreported tips paid to an employee only after the 

Internal Revenue Service establishes the amount of tips 

received by that employee.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tip Tax Fairness Act 

5 of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2034 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EMPLOYER LIABLE FOR FICA TAX ON TIPS RE2 CEIVED BY EMPLOYEE ONLY AFTER IRS ES3 TABLISHES AMOUNT OF TIPS RECEIVED BY 

4 THAT EMPLOYEE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (q) of section 3121 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to tips in7 cluded for both employee and employer taxes) is amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘The 

9 Secretary may issue a notice and demand to an employer 

10 for taxes imposed by section 3111 with respect to tips re11 ferred to in the exception in the preceding sentence only 

12 after the Secretary has determined the liability of each 

13 employee for taxes imposed by section 3101 on such tips.’’

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

16 of this Act.

Æ
No. IV-07-039 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 October 24, 2007 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov 

NRC PROPOSES $3,250 FINE FOR R&M ENGINEERING, INC. 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a fine of $3,250 against R&M 

Engineering, Inc. of Juneau, Alaska, for violating NRC requirements. 

 In an Oct. 23 letter to the company, NRC Region IV Administrator E. Collins said that as 

a result of an NRC inspection, the agency determined that the company violated NRC 

requirements for the possession and use of radioactive materials. 

 On Aug. 19, 2006, a company employee left a portable gauge containing radioactive 

materials unsecured in the bed of a pickup truck in the company’s parking lot for several minutes 

when he went into an office to retrieve some paperwork. In a separate incident later that day, a 

portable gauge containing radioactive materials fell out of the back of a company vehicle driven 

by the same individual on a public highway. The gauge was retrieved by a member of the public 

and promptly returned, but it was not under the company employee’s direct control and constant 

surveillance for a short period of time. 

 “The NRC considers the loss of licensed materials significant, even for short periods of 

time,” Collins said in a letter to the company. “Although there were no actual safety 

consequences resulting from this violation, the failure to maintain adequate security of portable 

gauges and the loss of the gauge could have resulted in unintended radiation doses to members of 

the public if the sealed sources were moved from the locked and shielded position.” 

 

 NRC discussed the violations, their significance, the root cause and the company’s 

corrective actions during an enforcement conference with the company on Oct. 4. The company 

has taken steps to prevent recurrence. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

611 Ryan Plaza Drive – Suite 400 

Arlington, Texas 76011-4005 
 The company has 30 days to either pay the proposed fine or challenge it and 10 days in 

which to request alternative dispute resolution. The NRC’s letter, its enclosures and the 

company’s response will be available through the agency’s public document reading room at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Help in accessing these documents is available 

from the NRC’s Public Document Room by calling 1-800-397-4209. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Order entered October 8, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00732-CV

ALBERT G. HILL, III, Appellant

V.

ALBERT G. HILL, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-04523

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant and relator Albert G. Hill, III’s September 29, 2014 motion 

for additional temporary relief, the receiver’s response, and Hill III’s reply. Hill III asks us to 

stay a hearing on the receiver’s September 26, 2014 application for fees and expenses for work 

performed after March 17, 2014 and all further hearings on fee applications. The receiver 

contends the motion is not ripe because the trial court has yet to rule on the application for fees,

but that if a stay is granted, the Court should require Hill III to post a bond to protect the receiver 

as a party who will be affected by the temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“As a 

condition of granting temporary relief, the court may require a bond to protect the parties who 

will be affected by the relief.”). Hill III responds that there is no authority for this Court to 

require a bond for fees and costs not yet adjudicated and that we should stay the trial court’s 
hearing on the fee application in order to preserve the status quo pending the outcome of the 

appeal. 

The Court GRANTS the motion for additional temporary relief and ORDERS the 

hearing on the receiver’s September 26, 2014 application for payment of fees and expenses and 

any hearings on further fee applications by the receiver stayed pending the disposition of this 

appeal and the consolidated petition for writ of mandamus. We DENY the receiver’s request for 

an additional bond. The bond required by our order of April 3, 2014 in this appeal remains in 

place.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
§ 532.403 New appointments. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a new appointment to a position shall be made at the minimum rate of the appropriate grade.
( b ) An agency may make a new appointment at a rate above the minimum rate of the appropriate grade in recognition of an appointees' special qualifications. In determining the rate at which to set the appointee's pay: ( 1 ) An agency must consider how the step has been set for employees who had similar qualifications (based on the level, type, or quality of the appointee's skills or competencies or other qualities and experiences) and who have been newly appointed to positions that are similar to the appointee's position (based on the position's occupational series, grade level, organization, geographic location, or other job-relevant factors), if applicable;
( 2 ) An agency may not consider the appointee's pay history (*i.e.,* existing pay or prior pay) or a pay rate from a competing job offer; and
( 3 ) An agency must consider other relevant factors (e.g., the level, type, or quality of the appointee's skills or competencies; or significant disparities between Federal and non-Federal salaries for the skills and competencies required in the position to be filled).
( c ) An agency shall make a new appointment at a step-rate above the minimum rate of a grade if the lead agency for the wage area has designated, in accordance with § 532.249, a step-rate above the first step-rate of a grade as the minimum step-rate at which a position may be filled.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 32274, June 9, 1993; 89 FR 5755, Jan. 30, 2024]
### §135. Parents' Day

(a) Designation.—The fourth Sunday in July is Parents' Day.

(b) Recognition.—All private citizens, organizations, and Federal, State, and local governmental and legislative entities are encouraged to recognize Parents' Day through proclamations, activities, and educational efforts in furtherance of recognizing, uplifting, and supporting the role of parents in bringing up their children.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1261.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 135(a) | 36:142c. | Oct. 14, 1994, Pub. L. 103–362, 108 Stat. 3465. |
| 135(b) | 36:142c–1. | |

Section

In subsection (b), the word "entities" is substituted for "bodies" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0040 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs Fiscal Year 2009

Accession Number: ML100601089

Date Released: Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML100570402 - SECY-10-0040 - Annual Report to the Commission on Licensee Performance in the Materials and Waste Programs Fiscal Year 2009 (6 page(s), 4/6/2010)
    - ML100570415 - SECY-10-0040 - Enclosure 1 - Annual Trend in Abnormal Occurrence Events from FY 2000-2009 (1 page(s), 4/6/2010)
    - ML100830544 - SECY-10-0040 - Enclosure 2 - Nuclear Material Events Database Annual Report FY 2009 (79 page(s), 2/1/2010)
    - ML100570426 - SECY-10-0040 - Enclosure 3 - Portable Gauge Events Trend Analysis for January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2009 (1 page(s), 4/6/2010)
    - ML100601070 - SECY-10-0040 - Enclosure 4 - Licensees Identified with Significant Performance Issues (4 page(s), 4/6/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Kodiak
Energy, Inc.
 
 EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 30, 2009
 /s/
William E. Brimacombe
 Name:
William E. Brimacombe
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rosario Di Maggio, Appellant, against Vernon A. Morhous, as Warden of Great Meadow Prison, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Washington County, dismissing a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant was convicted on January 28, 1947, in the Court of General Sessions of New York County of the misdemeanor of unlawfully possessing a narcotic drug, upon his plea of guilty. While awaiting sentence on this charge, he was indicted in the same court for attempted grand larceny in the second degree and he was convicted of this crime on June 1, 1949, upon his plea of guilty. On June 3, 1949, he was sentenced for an indeterminate term to the New York City Penitentiary on the misdemeanor conviction. Shortly thereafter on June 17, 1949, while he was serving his sentence in the penitentiary, he was sentenced to serve a term of from two to four years in State prison on the attempted grand larceny conviction. The defendant remained in the penitentiary until January 30, 1951, when he was *992released from the penitentiary and taken to Sing Sing Prison to begin his second sentence of two to four years. The appellant contends that, in the absence of any statement of the sentencing court to the contrary, the two sentences must be deemed to have run concurrently. This contention finds support in the common-law rule, stated in the case relied upon by the appellant, that “ Ordinarily, two or more sentences run concurrently, in the absence of specific provisions in the judgment to the contrary” *(People ex rel.*De *Santis*v. *Warden Gity Penitentiary,*176 Mise. 844, 845, affd. 262 App. Div. 1003; see, also, *People ex rel. Gerbino*v. *Ashworth,*267 App. Div. 579). But this rule has been superseded in certain specific situations set forth in subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 2190 of the Penal Law *(People*v. *Ingber,*248 N. Y. 302). This ease falls within the letter of subdivision 1 of section 2190. The appellant has been convicted of two offenses “ before sentence had been pronounced upon him for either offense ”; therefore the sentence upon the second conviction “ must commence at the termination of the first or other prior term”. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, *Go*on, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See *post,*p. 998.]
§ 894.401 How do I pay premiums? ( a ) *Employees* and employees of the United States Postal Service pay premiums through payroll allotments.
( b ) *Annuitants* and survivor *annuitants* pay premiums through annuity allotments.
( c ) *Compensationers* pay premiums through allotments from *compensation* payments.
( d ) In limited circumstances, individuals may make direct premium payments. See § 894.405.
( e ) A *sponsor, TEI certifying family member, TEI former spouse, or TEI* who is an unremarried survivor pays premiums the following ways: ( 1 ) A *sponsor* or *TEI certifying family member* who receives uniformed services pay or uniformed services retirement pay shall pay premiums through deduction from payroll (including uniformed services retirement pay deduction).
( 2 ) A *sponsor* or *TEI certifying family member* who is not described in paragraph (e)(1) of this section, and a *TEI former spouse* or *TEI* who is an unremarried survivor shall pay premiums through: ( i ) Automatic bank withdrawal; or
( ii ) Direct premium payments.
[73 FR 50184, Aug. 26, 2008, as amended at 83 FR 58179, Nov. 19, 2018; 88 FR 47747, July 25, 2023]
#### § 880.103 Definitions.

For purposes of this part—

*Annuitant* means an individual who has separated from the Federal service with, and has retained, title to a CSRS or FERS annuity, has satisfied the age and service requirements for commencement of that annuity, and has filed an application for that annuity;

*Associate Director* means OPM's Associate Director for Retirement and Insurance or his or her designee;

*Authorized institution* means a government organization or official legally charged with making determinations of death in the State or country of the missing annuitant's domicile, citizenship, or disappearance;

*CSRS* means the Civil Service Retirement System established in subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code;

*FEGLI* means the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance program established in chapter 87 of title 5, United States Code;

*FEHBP* means the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program established in chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code;

*FERS* means the basic benefit portion of the Federal Employees Retirement System established in subchapters I, II, IV, V, and VI of chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code; *FERS* does not include benefits under the Thrift Savings Plan established under subchapters III and VII of chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code;

*Missing annuitant* means an individual who has acquired the status of missing annuitant under § 880.203(b).
================================================================================



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-130561) of Kodiak Energy, Inc. of our report dated April 7,
2006, with respect to Note 2, 2005 Restatement, Noveember 30, 2006 with respect
to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Kodiak Energy, Inc.
which is included in the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended
December 31, 2005.




/s/ Meyers Norris Penny LLP

Calgary, Canada
December 6, 2006























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### LEWIS v. UNITED STATES.

No. 12009.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 24, 1954.

Decided June 10, 1954.

Mr. Walter E. Gallagher, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Myron G. Ehrlich, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Kenneth D. Wood and Alexander L. Stevas, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 This is an appeal from a decision of the Municipal Court of Appeals, holding that the occupational tax imposed by Chapter 27A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 3290 (1952), on the business of accepting wagers, is constitutional in its application to the District of Columbia. United States v. Lewis, D.C.Mun.App.1953, 100 A.2d 40. That decision is clearly correct, in view of United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22, 73 S.Ct. 510, 97 L.Ed. 754, rehearing denied, 1953, 345 U.S. 931, 73 S.Ct. 778, 97 L.Ed. 1360. “Of course Congress may tax what it also forbids.” United States v. Stafoff, 1923, 260 U.S. 477 at page 480, 43 S.Ct. 197 at page 199, 67 L.Ed. 358.

Affirmed.
§ 919.700 When may the suspending official issue a suspension? Suspension is a serious action. Using the procedures of this subpart and subpart F of this part, the suspending official may impose suspension only when that official determines that— ( a ) There exists an indictment for, or other adequate evidence to suspect, an offense listed under § 919.800(a), or
( b ) There exists adequate evidence to suspect any other cause for debarment listed under § 919.800(b) through (d); and
( c ) Immediate action is necessary to protect the public interest.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2303

To limit the United States share of assessments for the United Nations 

regular budget. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2003

Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To limit the United States share of assessments for the 

United Nations regular budget.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON THE UNITED STATES SHARE OF 

4 ASSESSMENTS FOR UNITED NATIONS REG5 ULAR BUDGET. 

6 Section 11 of the United Nations Participation Act 

7 of 1945 (22 U.S.C. 287e–3) is amended by striking ‘‘22 

8 percent of the total of all assessed contributions for that 

9 budget’’ and inserting ‘‘the largest assessed contribution 
2

•HR 2303 IH 

1 of any other permanent member country of the United Na2 tions Security Council’’.

Æ