alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Gap 5

Risk Considerations for a Produc

Facility Licensed Under 10 CFR Pa

May 13, 2010 
10 CFR Part 70

Receptor Worker 

ISA requirements in 10 CFR Part 70 do not adequately address the increased risk a reprocessing facility poses relative to other fcycle facilities

– “high consequence” accidents to be 

made “highly unlikely” by applying IROFS

– “intermediate consequence” 

accidents to be made “unlikely” by applying IROFS

– Likelihood criteria on a per accident 

sequence basis recommended in NUREG-1520 

• High consequence: 10-5 per yr• Intermed consequence: 10-4 per yr

May 13, 2010 

p

EventHigh Consequence:-

- > 100 rem (TEDE)- Endanger life of worker Endanger life of worker 

(chemical)

Intermediate Consequence:

- > 25 rem- Irreversible or serious

long-lasting effect(chemical)

(Low Consequence)

Mild transient health effects or less
NEI Recommendation

• NEI White Paper – December 2008

– Recommends an ISA approach supported 

quantitative assessment of the risk to a mof the 

pp p ublic ex

posed to fission 

products t

extent practicable based on the availability 

May 13, 2010
ACNW&M Recommendatio

• ACNW&M White Paper – June 2008, NUR

– NRC needs to consider modifying ISA requirem

10 CFR Part 70 for reprocessing

– Regulation that utilizes PRA insights is prefera

one based on ISA since the latter has significaone based on ISA since the latter has significa

limitations in treating dependent failures, humreliability, uncertainties, and aggregation of s

– Need for ALARA requirements that establish d

objectives

– Effort to do an ISA or PRA to evaluate risks for 

reprocessing facility is similar

May 13, 2010
Additional References

• Reactor Safety Goals and Objectives (51 

30028; August 21, 1986)

• “Risk-Informed Decision-Making for Nu

Material and Waste Applications Rev 1 Material and Waste Applications Rev. 

1

”

February 2008 (ML080720238)

• NRC’s PRA Policy Statement (60 FR 426

August 16, 1995)

May 13, 2010
PRA Policy Statement - 199

The Commission believes that an overall policy on 

of PRA methods in nuclear regulatory activities shoestablished so that the many potential applicationcan be implemented in a consistent and predictabmanner that would promote regulatory stability anefficienc

y.

In addition, the Commission believes that the use technology in NRC regulatory activities should be ito the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in Pmethods and data and in a manner that complemeNRC’s deterministic approach and supports the NRtraditional defense-in-depth philosophy.

May 13, 2010
Discussion Topics

• Assessment of aggregated risk to a mem

the public from accidents?

• How should potential accidents that ca

much higher source terms relative much higher source terms relative to ex

to ex

fuel cycle facilities be best addressed?

• ISA vs PRA?

May 2010
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2275

To reinstate the requirement that firearms dealers comply with the Freedom 

of Information Act by providing information about firearms purchasers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2003

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself and Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To reinstate the requirement that firearms dealers comply 

with the Freedom of Information Act by providing information about firearms purchasers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘People’s Right to 

5 Know Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FOIA LIMITATION. 

7 Section 644 of the Treasury and General Government 

8 Appropriations Act, 2003 (Public Law 108–7, div. J) is 

9 repealed.

Æ
Exhibit 99(e)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of credit card
accounts owned by Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2000-1 (the
accounts) has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and
Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated November 16, 2000
(the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31,
2002. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the
assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the
servicing of accounts has been conducted in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Agreement, as
supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the accounts has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with
the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the
Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated November 16, 2000, as supplemented, as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

                                              /s/ KPMG LLP
                                              KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>
                              Management Assertion


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of credit card
accounts owned by Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, Series 2000-1 has
been conducted by Household Credit Card Services, a division of Household
Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance
Corporation, as Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set
forth in Articles III and Section 5.08 of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement
dated November 16, 2000, as supplemented.







/s/ Margaret Sprude
------------------------
Margaret Sprude
Chief Financial Officer-
Household Credit Card Services


February 28, 2003
---------------------------------
Date
#### John Hennegan, Respondent, and American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Proposed Intervener, Appellant, v. States Marine Corporation, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





The Board of Directors


WebEx Communications, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-61652 and 333-47892) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-67580) on Form S-3 of WebEx Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2002, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of WebEx Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, and the related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report on Form 10-K of WebEx, Communications, Inc.





/s/    KPMG LLP





Mountain View, California


March 27, 2002
#### In the Matter of the Application of The People of the State of New York, by Louis H. Pink, as Superintendent of Insurance, for an Order to Take Possession of the Property of and Rehabilitate the Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company. In the Matter of a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights *601of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises Located at 25 West Broadway, Long Beach, Guaranteed by Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company. (Guarantee No. 181, 464.) In the Matter of an Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Disbursements. Long Beach Apartments, Inc., et al., Appellants; Manufacturers Trust Company, as Trustee, et al., Respondents.

In our opinion the allowances as made were excessive. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1I, Alan B. Levan certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Levitt Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d — 15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter  (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 9, 2007
#### Owen E. Abraham, Assignee, etc., of Charles E. Ball and Louis E. Whicher, Composing the Firm of Ball & Whicher, Appellant, v. The *916American Exchange National Bank, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0060 - Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Break Frequencies for the Option III Risk-Informed Reevaluation of 10 CFR 50.46, Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50, and General Design Criteria (GDC) 35

Accession Number: ML040860198

Date Released: Wednesday, April 28, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML040860129 - SECY-04-0060 - Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) Break Frequencies for the Option III Risk-Informed Reevaluation of 10 CFR 50.46, Appendix K to 10 CFR Part 50, and General Design Criteria (GDC) 35 (6 page(s), 4/13/2004)
    - ML040860166 - SECY-04-0060 - Attachment - 10 CFR 50.46 LOCA Frequency Development (24 page(s), 4/13/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and                           ( print page 65209)                        the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel Protein Kinase G Regulation of Granulosa Cell Viability.                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884,                         *ranhandj@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25020  Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 89-6428.

#### In re Madson.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Tell-A-Tale Incorporated (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, AnthonyN. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or			15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all			material respects, the financial condition and results of operations			of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Anthony N. DeMint |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | January 29, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
### §22905. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1310.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22905(a) | 36:3906. | Nov. 6, 1986, Pub. L. 99–604, §§6, 7, 100 Stat. 3447. |
| 22905(b) | 36:3907. | |

Section

The words "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States in which it is incorporated" in 36:3906 and "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States wherein it is incorporated" in 36:3907 are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy Halterman, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Leroy Halterman


Leroy Halterman


President and Secretary


Principal Executive Officer







Date: September 14, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARLON STAFFORD BENJAMIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-01-125; CA-03-1017-1)

Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 28, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marlon Stafford Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Marlon Stafford Benjamin seeks to appeal from the

district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by

the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Benjamin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny

his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### §3751. Termination of program

The Secretary may not make commitments for financial assistance under this subchapter after September 30, 1986.

(Added Pub. L. 97–72, title III, §302(a), Nov. 3, 1981, 95 Stat. 1059, §1851; amended Pub. L. 101–237, title III, §313(b)(1), Dec. 18, 1989, 103 Stat. 2077; renumbered §3751, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 1851 of this title as this section.

1989—Pub. L. 101–237 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
No. I-10-038 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

August 13, 2010 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT 

R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR PLANT 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, 

Pa., have assigned Gordon Hunegs as the senior resident inspector at 

the R.E. Ginna nuclear power plant in Ontario, N.Y. The plant is 

operated by Constellation Energy. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two 

NRC resident inspectors. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at 

the facility, conducting regular inspections and monitoring plant 

operations. The resident inspectors can be assigned to any one site for a total of about seven 

years. 

 “Gordon Hunegs has the experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC 

ensure that Ginna conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect the public 

health and safety," said acting NRC Region I Administrator Marc L. Dapas. 

 Hunegs joined the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta in 1986 as a project engineer. He 

has been assigned as a resident inspector at Indian Point 3 in Buchanan, N.Y., and as a senior 

resident inspector at Indian Point 2, and at FitzPatrick and Nine Mile Point in Scriba, N.Y. 

Hunegs served in the United States Navy for seven years. He is a graduate of the United States 

Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md. 

 Hunegs joins Resident Inspector Lauren Casey at Ginna. They can be reached at 

315/524-6935. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
#### § 894.703 How long does my coverage as an annuitant or compensationer last?

Your coverage as an *annuitant* or *compensationer* continues as long as you continue receiving an annuity or *compensation* and pay your premiums, unless you cancel your coverage during an open season or terminate coverage due to insufficient annuity or *compensation.*