alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 2130

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 121

Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, as the ‘‘New Bridge Landing

Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

121 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, and known

as the North Hackensack Station Post Office, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘New Bridge Landing Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘New Bridge

Landing Post Office’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# L_2022246EN.01011301.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/113 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/113

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 150/2022

of 29 April 2022

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1594]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1383 of 15 June 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/990 with regard to requirements for assets received by money market funds as part of reverse repurchase agreements (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1383 of 15 June 2021 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/990 with regard to requirements for assets received by money market funds as part of reverse repurchase agreements (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 31mb (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/990) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| | ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32021 R 1383: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1383 of 15 June 2021 (OJ L 298, 23.8.2021, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘, as amended by:

—

32021 R 1383: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1383 of 15 June 2021 (OJ L 298, 23.8.2021, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1383 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 22/2020 of 7 February 2020 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 298, 23.8.2021, p. 1.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

(2)  Not yet published in the OJ.

2

---
Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart E to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.519 Negotiation impasses. ( a ) If the Department and exclusive representative are unable to reach an agreement under §§ 9701.515 or 9701.518, either party may submit the disputed issues to the HSLRB for resolution.
( b ) If the parties do not arrive at a settlement after assistance by the HSLRB, the HSLRB may take whatever action is necessary and not inconsistent with this subpart to resolve the impasse.
( c ) Pursuant to §§ 9701.508 and 9701.525, the HSLRB's regulations will provide for a single, integrated process to address all matters associated with a negotiations dispute, including unfair labor practices, negotiability disputes, and bargaining impasses.
( d ) Notice of any final action of the HSLRB under this section must be promptly served upon the parties. The action will be binding on such parties during the term of the agreement, unless the parties agree otherwise.
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, March 22, 1999 -- Part 1

----
§ 18.16 Answer to application. ( a ) Within 30 calendar days after service of an application, counsel representing the agency against which an award is sought may file an answer to the application. Unless agency counsel requests an extension of time for filing (an extension for an additional 30 days is available as a matter of right) or files a statement of intent to negotiate under paragraph (b) of this section, failure to file an answer within the 30 calendar day period may be treated as a consent to the award requested.
( b ) If agency counsel and the applicant believe that the issues in the fee application can be settled, they may jointly file a statement of their intent to negotiate a settlement. The filing of this statement shall extend the time for filing an answer for an additional 30 days, and further extensions may be granted by the adjudicative officer upon request by agency counsel and the applicant.
( c ) The answer shall explain in detail any objections to the award requested and identify the facts relied on in support of the agency counsel's position. If the answer is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, agency counsel shall include with the answer either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 18.20.
[47 FR 13510, Mar. 31, 1982, as amended at 53 FR 6799, Mar. 3, 1988]
Russia Changes Excise Tax

----

Source: Federal Law No. 29-FZ of 14 February 1998 "On the introduction of amendments to theFederal Law "On Excise Tax" published 18 February 1998 in "Rossiiskaya Gazeta".
Law on Excise Tax Amendent
#### § 831.2004 Amount of lump-sums.

If applicable, the amount of a refund will include interest computed as described in § 831.105(b).
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

[letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers] 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 7, 2003 except with respect to Note 19 which is as of March 8, 2004, which appears inNetEase.com, Inc.’s Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-100069) of NetEase.com, Inc. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian CPAs Limited Company 

 

Beijing, China 

July 7, 2004
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET FEB. 7-9 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting Feb. 7-9 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, 

final review of the license renewal application for the Vermont Yankee nuclear power station; 

proposed licensing strategy for the next generation nuclear plants; and results of the (nuclear 

plant) cable response to live fire testing and fire model improvement program. 

Portions of this meeting may be closed to protect information that is proprietary and are 

identified in the agenda. 

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants 

and related safety issues. 

 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North 

building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. The sessions on Thursday and Friday will run from 8:30 a.m 

to 7 p.m., and Saturday’s session will run from 7:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. A complete agenda is 

available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/acrs/agenda/2008. 

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting 

should contact Girija S. Shukla, at (301) 415-6855. To pursue video conferencing services, 

contact Theron Brown, at (301) 415-8066. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-018 January 29, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2468 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2468

To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify a 
            high priority project in the State of Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century to modify a 
            high priority project in the State of Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HIGH PRIORITY PROJECT, MICHIGAN.

    Item number 1375 of the table contained in section 1602 of the 
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (112 Stat. 307) is 
amended by striking ``Preliminary'' and all that follows through 
``Emmet County'' and inserting ``Petoskey area transportation needs 
study, and trunkline preservation and safety in the Petoskey area''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701

#### Editorial Note:

At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

#### § 9701.362 Special assignment payments.

DHS will issue implementing directives regarding additional payments for employees serving on special assignments in positions placing significantly greater demands on the employee than other assignments within the employee's band. DHS may determine the amount of the payments and the conditions for eligibility, including any performance or service agreement requirements. Payments may be made at the same time as basic pay or in periodic lump-sum payments. Special assignment payments are not basic pay for any purpose and may be terminated or reduced at any time without triggering pay retention provisions or adverse action procedures.
BA # 2633
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of AIDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Hui Lin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Hui Lin Hui Lin Chief Financial Officer Date: November 14, 2007
### §170106. Restrictions

(a) Profit.—The corporation may not engage in business for profit.

(b) Stock.—The corporation may not issue stock.

(c) Political Activities.—The corporation shall be nonpolitical and may not provide financial aid to, or otherwise promote the candidacy of, an individual seeking public office.

(d) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director, officer, member, or employee during the life of the corporation or on its dissolution or final liquidation. This subsection does not prevent the payment of reasonable compensation to an officer or employee or reimbursement for actual necessary expenses in amounts approved by the board of directors.

(e) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, member, or employee. Directors who vote for or assent to making such a loan, and officers who participate in making the loan, are jointly and severally liable to the corporation for the amount of the loan until it is repaid.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1441.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170106(a), (b) | 36:1155. | Aug. 11, 1971, Pub. L. 92–93, §§5, 6, 14, 85 Stat. 318, 319. |
| 170106(c) | 36:1156. | |
| 170106(d) | 36:1164(a). | |
| 170106(e) | 36:1164(b). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "pecuniary" and "or gain" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the word "capital" is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "as an organization" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (d), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title.
NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE TO DISCUSS APPARENT 

VIOLATION AT FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a regulatory conference with 

officials of Southern Nuclear Operating Co. on July 12 to discuss an apparent violation of plant 

procedures that led to a fire in the control room of the Farley Nuclear Plant.

NRC and Southern Nuclear officials will discuss the significance of the inspection finding, 

which involved the failure to maintain the proper configuration of a system that supplies oil to the 

reactor coolant pumps. This condition resulted in an electrical short causing a fire in a switch on the 

Unit 1 main control board on Nov. 10, 2010 when that unit was not in operation. The fire was 

extinguished within approximately one minute. The risk was to both units since the plant has a 

shared control room.

The regulatory conference is scheduled for 12:30 p.m. EDT in the NRC’s Region II office, 

located at 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE., Suite 1200, in Atlanta. The public is invited to observe 

and NRC officials will be available to answer questions.

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a 

color-coded system which classifies findings as green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of 

safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that the violation at Farley was 

“white,” which means it has a low to moderate safety significance.

No decisions on the final safety significance or possible enforcement action will be made at 

the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

The NRC inspection report in which the apparent violation is documented is publicly 

available online at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The number to access the report is 

ML111590912.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Site: www.nrc.gov

Blog: http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov

No: II-11-041

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

 

 July 6, 2011

E-mail: OPA2.Resource@nrc.gov
§ 838.1121 Procedures and requirements. ( a ) Except as otherwise expressly provided in this part, the procedures and requirements applicable to legal process under part 581 of this chapter apply to OPM's administration of child abuse judgment enforcement orders.
( b ) ( 1 ) OPM will accept for processing any legal process under part 581 of this chapter that appears valid on its face.
( 2 ) ( i ) After OPM has determined that a child abuse judgment enforcement order is valid on its face, OPM will not entertain any complaint concerning the validity of the order. Such complaints must be presented to authorities having jurisdiction to review the validity of the legal process.
( ii ) OPM will not delay compliance with a child abuse judgment enforcement order based on any complaint concerning the validity of the order unless instructed to do so by an appropriate authority under the law of the jurisdiction issuing the legal process, the office of the United States Attorney for the jurisdiction issuing the legal process, or the U.S. Department of Justice.
( c ) ( 1 ) The address for service of a child abuse judgment enforcement order is provided in appendix A to subpart A of this part.
( 2 ) ( i ) OPM considers service of legal process by mailing or delivery of the child abuse judgment enforcement order to the designated address appropriate service notwithstanding more formal requirements imposed on creditors under State law.
( ii ) OPM will execute forms required under a State procedure to waive any right to more formal procedures for service of legal process than specified in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Kramont Realty Trust (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl E. Kraus,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ Carl E. Kraus
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Carl E. Kraus
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    Kramont Realty Trust
                                    March 15, 2004

                                       67
#### KIEFFER v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.

No. 11769.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 9, 1954.

Decided April 22, 1954.

Mrs. Katherine M. Staley and Mr. James F. Sharkey, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Mr. Harry L. Cohen, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant.

Mr. Paul R. Connolly, Washington, D. C., for appellee. Mr. George D. Horn-ing, Jr., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before CLARK, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

*242PER CURIAM.

In an action for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the appellee, in connection with a fall of appellant in alighting from one of appellee’s buses, the District Court at the conclusion of appellant’s case directed a verdict in favor of appellee because of insufficient evidence of negligence. We affirm. The cause of the fall was left in such uncertainty at the conclusion of appellant’s case that to permit the jury to attribute the claimed injuries to the negligence of appel-lee would be too speculative to warrant submission of the issue to them.

Affirmed.
### §7636. Exemption of educational assistance payments from taxation

Notwithstanding any other law, any payment to, or on behalf of a participant in the Educational Assistance Program, for tuition, education expenses, a stipend, or education debt reduction under this chapter shall be exempt from taxation.

(Added Pub. L. 100–322, title II, §216(b), May 20, 1988, 102 Stat. 529, §4336; renumbered §7636, Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(b)(1), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 238; amended Pub. L. 105–368, title VIII, §805(6), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3359.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–368 substituted "a stipend, or education debt reduction" for "or a stipend".

1991—Pub. L. 102–40 renumbered section 4336 of this title as this section.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00193]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the ZAT1 SM (46) meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Mechanisms of Mind and 
Body Interventions (MMB).
    Date: February 1, 2019.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Martina Schmidt, Ph.D., Chief, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Center for Complementary & Integrative 
Health, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-594-3456, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c0f1f14111518111d3c111d151052121514521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1467777c797d7079755479757d783a7a7d7c3a737b62">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: January 22, 2019.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00193 Filed 1-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>