alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §40728A. Recovery of excess firearms, ammunition, and parts granted to foreign countries and transfer to corporation

(a) Authority to Recover.—The Secretary of the Army may recover from any country to which surplus firearms, ammunition, repair parts, or other supplies described in section 40732(a) of this title are furnished on a grant basis under the conditions imposed by section 505 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2314) any such surplus firearms, ammunition, repair parts, or supplies that become excess to the needs of such country.

(b) Cost of Recovery.—(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), the cost of recovery of any surplus firearms, ammunition, repair parts, or supplies under subsection (a) shall be treated as incremental direct costs incurred in providing logistical support to the corporation for which reimbursement shall be required as provided in section 40727(a) of this title.

(2) The Secretary may require the corporation to pay costs of recovery described in paragraph (1) in advance of incurring such costs. Amounts so paid shall not be subject to the provisions of section 3302 of title 31, but shall be administered in accordance with the last sentence of section 40727(a) of this title.

(c) Availability for Transfer to Corporation.—Any surplus firearms, ammunition, repair parts, or supplies recovered under subsection (a) shall be available for transfer to the corporation in accordance with section 40728 of this title under such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary shall prescribe for purposes of this section.

(Added Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title III, §354(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2162; amended Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title X, §1087(a)(2)(A), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 1013.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–92, §1087(a)(2)(A)(i), substituted "surplus firearms" for "rifles" wherever appearing.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–92, §1087(a)(2)(A)(ii), substituted "section 40732(a)" for "section 40731(a)".
§ 847.806 How much NAFI service must employees elect to use to qualify for an immediate CSRS or FERS retirement? ( a ) Employees must elect complete periods of NAFI service under this subpart.
( b ) A complete period of NAFI service in paragraph (a) of this section consists of the period from the date of appointment with an NAFI employer to the date of termination.
NRC APPROVES UPDATES TO NUCLEAR WASTE 

CONFIDENCE FINDINGS AND RULE 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved final revisions to the agency’s “Waste 

Confidence” findings and regulation, expressing the Commission’s confidence that the nation’s 

spent nuclear fuel can be safely stored for at least 60 years beyond the licensed life of any reactor 

and that sufficient repository capacity will be available when necessary. 

 In a Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) approved and issued today, the 

Commission approved the revisions to the draft final rule and additionally directed the staff to 

initiate a long-term rulemaking to address impacts of storage at onsite storage facilities, offsite 

storage facilities or both for extended periods. 

 “Today the Commission affirmed our confidence that spent nuclear fuel can be stored 

safely and securely without significant environmental impacts for at least 60 years after 

operation at any nuclear power plant,” said NRC Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko. “We also 

directed the NRC staff to conduct additional analysis for longer-term storage to ensure that we 

remain fully informed by current circumstances and scientific knowledge relating to spent fuel 

storage and disposal. This decision was carefully considered by the Commission. It is an 

important step forward as it provides a measure of certainty to all of our stakeholders.” 

 The Commission made clear in its SRM that the revisions of the waste confidence 

findings and rule are not intended to signal an endorsement of indefinite storage of spent fuel at 

reactor sites. 

 The current Waste Confidence rule (10 CFR Part 51.23) and findings, that this new rule 

and findings will update, express confidence that commercial high-level radioactive waste and 

spent fuel generated by any reactor “can be stored safely and without significant environmental 

impacts for at least 30 years beyond the licensed life for operation (which may include the term 

of a revised or renewed license) of that reactor” in its spent fuel basin or at either onsite or offsite 

independent spent fuel storage installations. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-162 September 15, 2010
The SRM gives the staff 60 days to incorporate these revisions to the Waste Confidence 

rule and findings before sending them to the Federal Register for publication. It also directs the 

staff to provide a plan to the Commission for the long-term rulemaking by the end of the 

calendar year. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §1159. Protection of service connection

Service connection for any disability or death granted under this title which has been in force for ten or more years shall not be severed on or after January 1, 1962, except upon a showing that the original grant of service connection was based on fraud or it is clearly shown from military records that the person concerned did not have the requisite service or character of discharge. The mentioned period shall be computed from the date determined by the Secretary as the date on which the status commenced for rating purposes.

(Added Pub. L. 86–501, §1, June 10, 1960, 74 Stat. 195, §359; amended Pub. L. 87–825, §6, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 950; renumbered §1159 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 359 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §4(b)(1), (2)(E), substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".

1962—Pub. L. 87–825 provided for computation of the period from the date the administrator determines as the date the status commenced for rating purposes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1962 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 87–825 effective first day of second calendar month which begins after Oct. 15, 1962, see section 7 of Pub. L. 87–825, set out as a note under section 110 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Musculoskeletal, Oral and Skin Sciences 
Integrated Review Group; Skeletal Muscle and Exercise Physiology 
Study Section.
    Date: February 7-8, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Torrance Marriott Redondo Beach, 3635 Fashion Way, 
Torrance, CA 90503.
    Contact Person: Richard Ingraham, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4116, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-496-8551, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f79e999085969f969a859fb79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="41282f26332029202c3329012c20282d6f2f28296f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 23, 2019.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00235 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

AMES 1, LLC,

 

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

No. 22-cv-0196

Filed: March 31, 2022

ORDER

For the reasons stated on the record on March 31, 2022, this Court DENIES as moot

Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF No. 15) and DENIES as 

moot Defendant’s Cross Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (ECF No. 16) given 

this Court’s ruling in Frawner Corporation v. United States, No. 22-cv-0078, granting in part 

Frawner Corporation’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. This Court’s ruling 

in Frawner enjoins Defendant United States from awarding and/or proceeding with any award 

under the Solicitation other than to SD Construction. (Frawner, ECF No. 33.) This Order does 

not impact Defendant’s ability to use other contracting methods to fulfill its contracting needs, if 

lawful and appropriate. (Frawner, ECF No. 31.) In Frawner, this Court also ordered that if

Defendant opts to continue with awards under the Solicitation, it shall undertake corrective action 

consistent with this Court’s ruling on the record and the following conditions:

1. Defendant shall not automatically assign as the overall “Relevancy” rating for a past 

performance effort the adjectival rating of the lowest rated “Relevancy” subfactor;
2

2. Defendant shall not treat the “magnitude” subfactor as a binary factor where past 

performance efforts valued above $2 million receive a “Not Relevant” rating for that 

subfactor and past performance efforts valued below $2 million receive a “Very 

Relevant” rating for that subfactor; rather, Defendant shall, to the extent it applies 

adjectival ratings to “Relevancy” subfactors, employ the full range of such ratings as 

defined in the Solicitation; and

3. Defendant shall conduct a best value trade-off analysis by documenting whether 

benefits of an offeror’s proposal outweigh any potential higher cost for the 

Government.

The Court issues this Order considering the expedited briefing in this case and the parties’ 

request for prompt resolution of this issue. As noted on the record and as agreed to by the parties, 

the Court will issue a more fulsome opinion regarding its decision at a later date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/ Eleni M. Roumel 

ELENI M. ROUMEL

Judge
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Floyd DeBenedetti, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 74-193;

Third District

August 5, 1974.

James Geis, of State AppeHate Defender’s Office, of Ottawa, for appeUant.

Martin Rudman, State’s Attorney, of JoHet, for the People.

PER CURIAM.
# L_2019323EN.01005501.xml

| 12.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/55

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 28/2018

of 9 February 2018

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2019/2064]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1941 of 24 October 2017 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the EU Ecolabel (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1941 of 24 October 2017 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the EU Ecolabel (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 2a (Regulation (EC) No 66/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 1941: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1941 of 24 October 2017 (OJ L 275, 25.10.2017, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 1941: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1941 of 24 October 2017 (OJ L 275, 25.10.2017, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/1941 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 February 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 275, 25.10.2017, p. 9.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Awareness and application of long-term monitoring data in 
the Pacific Islands.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-xxxx.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (request for a new information 
collection).
    Number of Respondents: 160.
    Average Hours per Response: Surveys, 30 minutes; focus groups, 90 
minutes.
    Burden Hours: 170.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for a new collection of 
information. The objective of the study is to understand the types of 
available socioeconomic data, types of data used and data gaps 
identified, regarding coastal conservation management, fisheries and 
other marine conservation management, and efforts (including 
opportunities and barriers) in integrating biophysical and 
socioeconomic data. The voluntary survey and interviews will assess the 
degree to which the available socioeconomic data are being used and 
have met the needs of the different natural resource management and 
conservation programs in the U.S. jurisdictions and affiliations in the 
Pacific island region. Results of the survey and interviews are 
expected to assist in guiding any future modifications of socioeconomic 
and biophysical indicators, data collecting tools, approaches, and 
communications of results.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; not for profit 
institutions; state, federal and tribal governments; Federal 
government.
    Frequency: One time in three years.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#541b1d06150b072136393d27273d3b3a143b39367a313b247a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdf2f4effce2eec8dfd0d4ceced4d2d3fdd2d0df93d8d2cd93dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: December 18, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-27627 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of BAS Consulting, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, B. Alva Schoomer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ B. Alva Schoomer



B. Alva Schoomer

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 4, 2005
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADDED BY**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of East Penn Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the
“Report”), I, **Theresa M. Wasko**, Treasurer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





·
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
                15(d) of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





·
            To
                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                in
                all material respects, the Company’s consolidated financial condition and
                results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
                periods
                presented in the Report.














/s/
      Theresa M.
      Wasko


**Theresa
      M. Wasko**, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer





Dated:    August
      14,
      2007


Page
      34
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0506 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. EDWARD JEFFREY ALLEN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER**
Pursuant to Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until January 3, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 27 2023

11/27/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0506
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312

To amend the Communications Satellite of 1962 to provide for the orderly 

dilution of the ownership interest in Inmarsat by former signatories 

to the Inmarsat Operating Agreement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2003

Mr. SHIMKUS (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. DINGELL, and Mr. 

UPTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Communications Satellite of 1962 to provide 

for the orderly dilution of the ownership interest in 

Inmarsat by former signatories to the Inmarsat Operating Agreement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ORBIT Technical Cor5 rections Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2312 IH 

1 SEC. 2. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING DEADLINES. 

2 Clause (ii) of section 621(5)(A) of the Communica3 tions Satellite Act of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 763(5)(A)) is 

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and in6 serting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; and 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2003’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘December 31, 2004’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 235 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 235

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect the religious 
 free exercise and free speech rights of churches and other houses of 
                                worship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 8, 2003

  Mr. Jones of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Blunt, Mr. 
 Hayes, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Souder, Mr. Hall, Mr. DeMint, Mr. 
Gutknecht, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Pence, 
   Ms. Hart, and Mr. Pitts) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to protect the religious 
 free exercise and free speech rights of churches and other houses of 
                                worship.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Houses of Worship Free Speech 
Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. HOUSES OF WORSHIP PERMITTED TO ENGAGE IN RELIGIOUS FREE 
              EXERCISE AND FREE SPEECH ACTIVITIES, ETC.

    Section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
redesignating subsection (p) as subsection (q) and by inserting after 
subsection (o) the following new subsection:
    ``(p) An organization described in section 508(c)(1)(A) (relating 
to churches) shall not fail to be treated as organized and operated 
exclusively for a religious purpose, or to have participated in, or 
intervened in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) 
any candidate for public office, for purposes of subsection (c)(3), or 
section 170(c)(2) (relating to charitable contributions), because of 
the content, preparation, or presentation of any homily, sermon, 
teaching, dialectic, or other presentation made during religious 
services or gatherings.''.

SEC. 3. CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAWS UNAFFECTED.

    Nothing in section 2 permits any disbursements for electioneering 
communications, or political expenditures, prohibited in the Federal 
Election Campaign Act of 1971.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made herein shall be effective as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```