alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §230313. Termination of existence and distribution of assets

(a) Authority To Make Contingent Provisions.—The national convention, by resolution, may declare that the corporate existence will terminate on the occurrence of a specified event and provide for the disposition of any property remaining after the discharge of all liabilities.

(b) Procedure for Carrying Out Contingent Provisions.—(1) An authenticated copy of the national convention's resolution must be filed in the office of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

(2) The court shall take jurisdiction when—

(A) the declared event has occurred; and

(B) a petition is filed with the court reciting the relevant facts.

(3) On proof of the facts, the court shall enter an order vesting title and ownership in accordance with the resolution of the national convention.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1485.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230313 | 36:779. | July 18, 1958, Pub. L. 85–530, §19, 72 Stat. 375. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "declare that the corporate existence will terminate on the occurrence of a specified event" are substituted for "declare the event upon which the corporate existence of the organization is to terminate" for clarity. The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b)(1), the word "duly" is omitted as unnecessary. The word "must" is substituted for "shall" for clarity because the filing is only required if the national convention decides to exercise its discretionary authority under subsection (a).

In subsection (b)(2)(B), the word "relevant" is substituted for "said" for clarity.

In subsection (b)(3), the word "due" is omitted as unnecessary. The word "order" is substituted for "decree" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The word "vesting" is substituted for "which shall be effective to vest" to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §30710. Service of process

(a) District of Columbia.—The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Designation of the agent shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(b) States, Territories, and Possessions.—As a condition to the exercise of any power or privilege granted by this chapter, the corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of each State, territory, or possession of the United States in which the corporation does business, the name and address of an agent in that State, territory, or possession on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1324.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30710(a) | 36:505 (2d, 3d sentences). | July 19, 1954, ch. 536, §§5 (2d, 3d sentences), 17, 68 Stat. 490, 492. |
| 30710(b) | 36:517. | |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "have" is substituted for "maintain at all times", and the word "authorized" is omitted, for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "is notice to or service on the corporation" are substituted for "shall be deemed sufficient notice or service upon the corporation" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (b), the word "precedent" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the Secretary of State, or similar office" for consistency in the revised title. The words "post office" and "authorized" are omitted as unnecessary.
466 P.2d 872

#### STATE of New Mexico ex rel. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION of New Mexico, Relator, v. The Honorable Garnett R. BURKS, District Judge of the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District of the State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 9017.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 10, 1970.

MOISE, Chief Justice, and COMPTON, TACKETT, WATSON and SISK, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
Exhibit 31



eROOMSYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Gestetner, Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Chairman of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during this period in which the annual report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c.

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.

I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|By:  /s/ David A. Gestetner |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board      |  | March 29, 2004
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|David A. Gestetner          |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |  |               



---
§ 900.603 Standards for a merit system of personnel administration. The quality of public service can be improved by the development of systems of personnel administration consistent with such merit principles as— ( a ) Recruiting, selecting, and advancing employees on the basis of their relative ability, knowledge, and skills, including open consideration of qualified applicants for initial appointment.
( b ) Providing equitable and adequate compensation.
( c ) Training employees, as needed, to assure high quality performance.
( d ) Retaining employees on the basis of the adequacy of their performance, correcting inadequate performance, and separating employees whose inadequate performance cannot be corrected.
( e ) Assuring fair treatment of applicants and employees in all aspects of personnel administration without regard to race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy and gender identity), national origin, age (as defined by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended), disability, genetic information (including family medical history), marital status, political affiliation, sexual orientation, status as parent, labor organization affiliation or nonaffiliation in accordance with chapter 71 of title V, or any other non-merit-based factor, or retaliation for exercising rights with respect to the categories enumerated above, where retaliation rights are available, and with proper regard for their privacy and constitutional rights as citizens. This “fair treatment” principle includes compliance with the Federal equal employment opportunity and nondiscrimination laws.
( f ) Assuring that employees are protected against coercion for partisan political purposes and are prohibited from using their official authority for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election or a nomination for office.
[48 FR 9210, Mar. 4, 1983, as amended at 79 FR 43923, July 29, 2014]
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Canadian American Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

regarding the status of Canadian American Railroad Company (CDAC)

as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231

et sea.) (RRA) and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 351 et sea.) (RUIA). CDAC has not previously been determined to

be an employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

Information about CDAC was furnished by Ronald L. Condon, Treasurer

of CDAC. Although CDAC began as a non-carrier, upon its

acquisition and operation of approximately two hundred miles of

rail line from Canadian Pacific Limited, it became a class III

carrier. See Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) Finance Docket

Nos. 32646 and 32657, decided December 29, 1994, and January 30,

1995, respectively. According to information provided by

Mr. Condon, CDAC began operations and its 52 employees have been

compensated from January 1, 1995. Mr. Condon stated that the line

in question interchanges with the Bangor and Aroostook Railroad and

Maine Central Railroad in Maine, and with the Canadian Pacific and

Canadian National in Canada. CDAC's volume of traffic is

approximately 22,000 carloads per year. All locomotives for CDAC

are leased; it neither owns nor leases freight cars at this time.

Section 1(a)(1) of the RRA defines the term "employer" to include:

(i) any express company, sleeping car

company, and carrier by railroad, subject to

subchapter I of chapter 105 of Title 4 9;

(ii) any company which is directly or

indirectly owned or controlled by, or under

common control with one or more employers as

defined in paragraph (i) of this subdivision,

and which operates any equipment or facility

or performs any service (except trucking

service, casual service, and the casual

operation of equipment or facilities) in

connection with the transportation of

passengers or property by railroad, or the

receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in

transit, refrigeration or icing, storage, or

handling of property transported by railroad

* * *. [45 U.S.C. §231 (a) (1) (i) and (ii)] .

Section 1(a) of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. § 351(a)) contains essentially

the same definition.

The evidence establishes that CDAC is a class III rail carrier.

Accordingly, it is determined that Canadian American Railroad

Company became a rail carrier employer under the Railroad

BCD 1995-83 BA # 2127
2

Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective

January 1, 1995, the date on which it began operations as a rail

carrier.
MARK SHAFFER NAMED AS NRC SAFETY ATTACHÉ AT U.S. MISSION TO 

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Mark Shaffer to a term as 

the agency’s new Nuclear Safety Attaché at the U.S. Mission to International 

Organizations in Vienna, Austria. As attaché, he will serve as the U.S. Mission’s 

expert on nuclear safety issues and programs, and provide programmatic and 

policy oversight of the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) safety 

program on behalf of the United States. 

Shaffer will transition to the attaché position during the summer and will assume the 

position formally in October. He is replacing Heather Astwood, who will be returning to the 

NRC’s Office of International Programs after a four-year term. 

Shaffer has extensive international experience, including a six-month assignment at the 

IAEA, where he was acting head of the Standards Applications Unit. Shaffer is currently serving 

as the Director for the Division of Intergovernmental Liaison and Rulemaking in the Office of 

Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. He joined the NRC in 

1991 as a radiation specialist at NRC’s Region IV office (Arlington, Tex.) in the Division of 

Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards. While there, Shaffer held various positions including 

Senior Materials Inspector, State Agreements Officer and Chief of the Nuclear Materials 

Inspection Branch. For two years beginning in June 2006, he served as the Deputy Director for 

the Division of Security Policy, within the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response. 

Prior to his career with NRC, Schaffer worked for several medical and academic research 

institutions in the areas of nuclear medicine and radiation protection. 

Shaffer holds a bachelor’s degree in nuclear medicine from Incarnate Word College in 

San Antonio, Texas.

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-116 

 

 June 28, 2010
§ 630.1001 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this subpart is to establish procedures and requirements for a voluntary leave bank program under which the unused accrued annual leave of an employee may be contributed to a leave bank for use by a leave bank member who needs such leave because of a medical emergency.
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to officers and employees— ( 1 ) To whom subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code applies; and
( 2 ) Who are employed in agencies and their organizational subunits operating a voluntary leave bank program under this subpart.
# L_2023164EN.01005801.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/58

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 323/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex VII (Recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1265]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/907 of 14 March 2019 establishing a Common Training Test for ski instructors under Article 49b of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of the professional qualifications (1), as corrected by OJ L 38, 11.2.2020, p. 39, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/907 of 14 March 2019 establishing a Common Training Test for ski instructors under Article 49b of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of the professional qualifications (1), as corrected by OJ L 38, 11.2.2020, p. 39, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 1c (Directive (EU) 2018/958 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘1d. | 32019 R 0907: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/907 of 14 March 2019 establishing a Common Training Test for ski instructors under Article 49b of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of the professional qualifications (OJ L 145, 4.6.2019, p. 7), as corrected by OJ L 38, 11.2.2020, p. 39.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1d.

32019 R 0907: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/907 of 14 March 2019 establishing a Common Training Test for ski instructors under Article 49b of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of the professional qualifications (OJ L 145, 4.6.2019, p. 7), as corrected by OJ L 38, 11.2.2020, p. 39.’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/907, as corrected by OJ L 38, 11.2.2020, p. 39, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 145, 4.6.2019, p. 7.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NRC APPROVES MAJOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL UPGRADE 

FOR SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS AT OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved a license amendment request 

from Duke Energy Carolinas to install an up-to-date computer upgrade of major safety-related 

systems at the Oconee Nuclear Station, located about 30 miles west of Greenville, S.C. 

The amended Oconee license gives Duke permission to replace 1970s-era analog, solidstate controls for the plant’s Reactor Protection System (RPS) and Engineered Safeguard 

Protection System (ESPS). Duke will install Teleperm XS (TXS) digital computer-based 

equipment. 

“Our staff reviewed the proposal to ensure the new systems can respond safely and 

appropriately to both normal plant conditions and emergency scenarios,” said Joseph Giitter, 

director of the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. “The new systems will process and react to information from the plant’s existing 

sensors that monitor the reactor core and critical plant parameters.” 

The NRC had previously reviewed the TXS basic platform to ensure it met applicable 

safety regulations, and in May 2000 the staff concluded U.S. nuclear power plants could apply to 

use the system. Duke submitted its Oconee-specific application in January 2008, supplementing 

its supporting information numerous times through December 2009. 

 

The NRC staff approved the Oconee amendment after confirming the new system’s 

ability to meet both safety requirements and NRC cybersecurity regulations that isolate the 

systems and prevent cyber attacks. The staff paid particular attention to the system’s ability to 

maintain two-way communications between various subsystems and provide diverse control 

pathways for safety-related commands, as well as the tools used to simulate and validate the 

system’s performance. NRC staff also inspected Duke’s procedures for the Oconee-specific TXS 

design and implementation and observed testing of the actual system at production facilities in 

Germany. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-021 February 1, 2010
This marks the first NRC approval for a nuclear power plant’s integrated digital RPS and 

ESPS instrumentation and control system. The agency had previously approved single safetyrelated digital control applications, such as for the main steam and feedwater isolation system at 

the Wolf Creek nuclear plant in Kansas. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
No. II-10-011 March 24, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC MOVING REGION II OFFICE TO NEW ATLANTA LOCATION APRIL 12 

Effective Monday, April 12, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II staff 

will be moving into new offices in Atlanta. Please change your contact information to reflect the 

following new address and telephone numbers for the Region II Office of Public Affairs: 

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Region II 

Marquis One Tower 

245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Roger Hannah, Senior Public Affairs Officer 

Office: 404-997-4417 Cell: 404-520-4394 

roger.hannah@nrc.gov

Joey Ledford, Public Affairs Officer 

Office: 404-997-4416 Cell: 404-567-0311 

joey.ledford@nrc.gov

If your call is urgent and you are unable to reach the Region II Office of Public Affairs by 

phone or email, you may contact the NRC headquarters Operations Center at 301-816-5100. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### In the Matter of John J. Brown, Petitioner, against Robert Moses et al., Constituting the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Respondents.

No opinion. Present— Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [191 Misc. 360.]