alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To:               Harold Simmons                        Date:    July 23, 2003

From:             Lanny Martin

Subject: Consulting Agreement


Harold:

The NL Finance  department  needs  something in writing to confirm my consulting
arrangement with NL Industries.

As agreed, I will provide consulting  services to you and NL Industries relating
to NL's  product  liability  (including  lead  paint  cases)  and  environmental
matters.  I will work with Rob Graham,  Dave  Garten,  outside  counsel,  Marcus
Martin and others in an effort to control the costs of the  overall  efforts and
to achieve the best results reasonably possible.

NL will compensate me at a rate of $600,000 [50,000 per month starting  8/15/03]
per annum  beginning on the  effective  date of my stepping down as CEO of NL on
July  2003.  NL will also  reimburse  me for  reasonable  business  expenses  in
connection with my consultation.

I will be given the normal  indemnity from NL acting as its agent in the matters
described above.

This  agreement is  terminable  at any time by either of us. Only the  indemnity
continues following termination.

My NL stock options will remain  outstanding until termination of this agreement
at which  time I will have 90 days to  exercise  any  vested  options  remaining
outstanding.

If you agree  with the  above  would you  please  sign and  return to me. I will
forward to NL's finance department.

Sincerely,



-------------------------------------------
/s/J. Landis Martin
Lanny Martin

Agreed and Accepted:



--------------------------------------------
/s/Harold C. Simmons
Harold C. Simmons
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Kwajo M. Sarfoh, is
the Chief Executive Officer and Princiapal Financial Officer of Cape Coastal Trading Corporation (the
Company).

This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I
certify that:

|a. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
               the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /S/ Kwajo M. Sarfoh
Kwajo M. Sarfoh, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial OfficerDate:  May 24, 2004
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 839.603 Can I later change my election?

Your election is irrevocable once your employer or OPM processes it. If you do not make a timely election, the resulting coverage (see § 839.602) is also irrevocable.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ikanos Communications, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Michael Gulett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
and Cory J. Sindelar, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                             |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                     |  | IKANOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|                     |  |                            
|Dated: July 23, 2009 |  | By:                         |  | /s/    MICHAEL GULETT                       
|                     |  |                             |  | Michael Gulett                              
|                     |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                     |  |                             |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                     |  |                            
|Dated: July 23, 2009 |  | By:                         |  | /s/    CORY J. SINDELAR                     
|                     |  |                             |  | Cory J. Sindelar                            
|                     |  |                             |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                     |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Agency Spotlight

----

**June 1998**
**World Bank--**The Republic of Moldova has received a loan from the World Bank toprocure irrigation pipes and equipment.  The Moldovan **Ministry of Agriculture andFood** is accepting sealed bids for the supply of pipe and equipment in five lots.  The lotscover similar types of equipment, suitable for  bidding by specialty suppliers.  Lots are divided asfollows: lot 1--sprinklers (540 sets), lot 2--portable diesel pumps (nine sets), lot 3--high-densitypolymer distribution pipes (various diameters), lot 4--high-density polymer irrigation pipe withdrip outlets every two-meter length, lot 5--electrical pumps (various capacities).  For moreinformation, visit ***BISNIS Online*** at http://www.mac.doc.gov/bisnis/cables/980528m3.htm.
**U.S. Department of Commerce/Commercial Service--** The Kazakhstan Ministry ofTransport has announced a list of priority projects for repair and maintenance services for roadand railway lines, as well as for transport and telecommunications services.  U.S. transport andconstruction companies are encouraged to participate in these projects.  Competitive tenders willbe announced once financing is identified for each project. U.S. companies are encouraged toremain in contact with the ministry and the American Embassy in Almaty for updates on financing. Selected projects include upgrading of the  Aktogai-Druzhba section of the Trans-Asian RailwayMainline project, development of high-speed traffic on the Astana-Almaty railway line, renewal ofrolling stock and container fleet, reorganization of trans-Caspian ferry service at the Aktauseaport, and rehabilitation of the road network in western Kazakhstan.  For more information,visit ***BISNIS Online*** at http://www.mac.doc.gov/bisnis/cables/980513kz.htm.
***This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the NewlyIndependent States (BISNIS)***
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 3.11


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

                                       OF

                    EOTT Energy Pipeline Limited Partnership


         EOTT Energy Pipeline Limited Partnership (hereinafter called the
"partnership"), a limited partnership organized under the Delaware Revised
Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the "Act"), for the purpose of amending
Certificate of Limited Partnership filed with the office of the Secretary of
State of Delaware on January 25, 1994, hereby certifies that:

         1. The name of the limited partnership is: EOTT Energy Pipeline Limited
Partnership

         2. Pursuant to provisions of Section 17-202, Title 6, Delaware Code,
the Certificate of Limited Partnership is amended as follows:

            1. The name of the limited partnership is: Link Energy Pipeline
               Limited Partnership

         3. This Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Limited Partnership
shall be effective on October 1, 2003.

         The undersigned, a general partner of the partnership, executed this
Certificate of Amendment on August 15, 2003.

                                          EOTT ENERGY GENERAL PARTNER, L.L.C.,
                                          General Partner


                                          /s/ Thomas M. Matthews
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Thomas M. Matthews, Authorized Person
[J-10-2015] [MO: Saylor, C.J.] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

ROBERT SCHANNE, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

JENNA ADDIS, 

 Appellee 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 106 MAP 2014 

Appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals, 

Third Circuit No. 12-4044 

ARGUED: March 10, 2015 

CONCURRING OPINION 

MADAME JUSTICE TODD DECIDED: August 17, 2015

I join the Majority Opinion. I write separately to emphasize that my position is 

firmly tied to the peculiar factual circumstances of the instant case. As noted by the 

majority, Jenna Addis was 26 years old and had been out of high school for more than 7 

years when she told Susan O’Bannon that she had a relationship with Robert Schanne 

while she was a high school student. Had Addis been a student at the time she 

confided in O’Bannon, I might very well have reached a different result.
§ 843.307 Basic benefits on death of a disability retiree. ( a ) Except as provided in § 843.312, the widow or widower of a retiree who retired based on disability under part 844 of this chapter is entitled to a current spouse annuity based on the service of the disability annuitant computed under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) In the case of a current spouse entitled to an annuity based on the service of a disability annuitant who died after attaining age 62, the amount of the current spouse annuity is one-half of the amount of the annuity to which such disability annuitant was entitled as computed under part 844 of this chapter (including any appropriate reduction under § 844.302(b)(2) or (c)(2) of this chapter, and any adjustments under section 8462 of title 5, United States Code) as of the day before the date of the disability annuitant's death.
( 2 ) In the case of a current spouse entitled to an annuity based on the service of a disability annuitant who dies before age 62, the amount of the current spouse annuity equals 50 percent of the amount to which the disability annuitant would have been entitled under § 844.303 of this chapter, if the disability annuitant had attained age 62 on the day before his or her death. However, in determining the amount under § 844.303(a) of this chapter, creditable service includes the period of time between the date of death and the date of the 62nd anniversary of the birth of the annuitant, but average pay is adjusted (under section 8462 of title 5, United States Code) only through date of death.
[52 FR 2074, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 23014, June 17, 1987]
Exhibit 31.1
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Charlie W. Brinkley, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SouthernCommunity Bancorp (the “Issuer”);
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
 4. The Issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theIssuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The Issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have significant role in the Issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004         /s/ Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr.   Charlie W. Brinkley, Jr.   Principal Executive Officer
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Boric Acid Corrosion of Light Water Reactor Pressure Vessel Materials (NUREG/CR-6875, ANL-04/08)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6875 (PDF -13.81 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**May 2004**Date Published:**July 2005

**Prepared by:** J.-H. Park, O.K. Chopra, K. Natesan, and W.J. Shack Energy Technology Division Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

P. Krishnaswamy, D. Rudland, and G.M. Wilkowski Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus Columbus, Ohio 43221

William H. Cullen, Jr., NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6722

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents experimental data on electrochemical potential and corrosion rates of the materials found in the reactor pressure vessel head and control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) nozzles in boric acid solutions of varying concentrations at temperatures of 95–316°C (203–600°F). Tests were conducted in (a) high-temperature, high-pressure aqueous solutions with a range of boric acid concentrations, (b) high-temperature (150–316°C) H-B-O solutions at ambient pressure, wetted and dry, and (c) low-temperature (≈95°C) saturated, aqueous, boric acid solutions. These correspond to the following situations: (a) low leakage through the nozzle and nozzle/head annulus plugged, (b) low leakage through the nozzle and nozzle/head annulus open, and (c) significant cooling due to high leakage and nozzle/head annulus open. The results indicate significant corrosion only for the low-alloy steel and no corrosion for Alloy 600 or 308 stainless steel cladding. Also, corrosion rates were significant in saturated boric acid solutions, and no material loss was observed in boric acid melts or deposits in the absence of moisture. The results are compared with the existing corrosion/wastage data in the literature.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
# L_2018073EN.01002101.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 148/2016

of 8 July 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/370]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/266 of 7 December 2015 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/266 of 7 December 2015 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zza (Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 0266: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/266 of 7 December 2015 (OJ L 54, 1.3.2016, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 0266: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/266 of 7 December 2015 (OJ L 54, 1.3.2016, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/266 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 54, 1.3.2016, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §1305. Reevaluation of dependency and indemnity compensation determinations pursuant to changes in presumptions of service connection

(a) Reevaluation.—Whenever a law, including through a regulation or Federal court decision or settlement, establishes or modifies a presumption of service connection, the Secretary shall—

(1) identify all claims for dependency and indemnity compensation under this chapter that—

(A) were submitted to the Secretary;

(B) were evaluated and denied by the Secretary before the date on which such provision of law went into effect; and

(C) might have been evaluated differently had the establishment or modification been applicable to the claim;

(2) allow for the reevaluation of such claims at the election of the claimant; and

(3) notwithstanding section 5110 of this title, with respect to claims approved pursuant to such reevaluation, provide compensation under this chapter effective as if the establishment or modification of the presumption of service connection had been in effect on the date of the submission of the original claim described in paragraph (1).

(b) Outreach.—(1) The Secretary shall conduct outreach to inform relevant claimants that they may elect to have a claim be reevaluated in light of the establishment or modification of a presumption of service connection described in subsection (a).

(2) Outreach under paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A) The Secretary shall publish on the internet website of the Department a notice that such claimants may elect to have a claim so reevaluated.

(B) The Secretary shall notify, in writing or by electronic means, veterans service organizations of the ability of such claimants to elect to have a claim so reevaluated.

(C) The Secretary shall contact each claimant identified under subsection (a) in the same manner that the Department last provided notice of a decision.

(Added Pub. L. 117–168, title II, §204(a), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1776.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 117–168, title II, §204(b), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1777, provided that: "Section 1305 of title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to presumptions of service connection established or modified on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 10, 2022], including pursuant to amendments made by this Act [see Short Title of 2022 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title]."

#### Rule of Construction

Pub. L. 117–168, title II, §204(c), Aug. 10, 2022, 136 Stat. 1777, provided that: "Nothing in this section [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note above] shall be construed as modifying the obligations of the Department of Veterans Affairs under Federal court decisions or settlements in effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act [Aug. 10, 2022]."
§ 280.212 Matter protected against disclosure. ( a ) *Protective measures.* The administrative law judge may limit discovery or introduction of evidence or issue such protective or other orders as in the ALJ's judgment may be needed to prevent undue disclosure of classified or sensitive documents or information. Where the administrative law judge determines that documents containing the classified or sensitive matter need to be made available to a party to avoid prejudice, the ALJ may direct that an unclassified and/or nonsensitive summary or extract of the documents be prepared. The administrative law judge may compare the extract or summary with the original to ensure that it is supported by the source document and that it omits only so much as must remain undisclosed. The summary or extract may be admitted as evidence in the record.
( b ) *Arrangements for access.* If the administrative law judge determines that this procedure is unsatisfactory and that classified or otherwise sensitive matter must form part of the record in order to avoid prejudice to a party, the administrative law judge may provide the parties an opportunity to make arrangements that permit a party or a representative to have access to such matter without compromising sensitive information. Such arrangements may include obtaining security clearances or giving counsel for a party access to sensitive information and documents subject to assurances against further disclosure, including a protective order, if necessary.