alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 224

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount that 

small businesses may expense under section 179 to $75,000. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the amount that small businesses may expense under 

section 179 to $75,000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Ex5 pensing Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXPENSING UNDER SECTION 179. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 179(b) 

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to election 

9 to expense certain depreciable business assets) is amended 

10 to read as follows: 
2

•HR 224 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) DOLLAR LIMITATION.—The aggregate cost 

2 which may be taken into account under subsection 

3 (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed $75,000.’’

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years ending after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00333

- CV

Betty Lou SHEERIN

, Appellant

v.

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008

- CI

- 01245 Honorable Victor Hugo Negron Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2013

VACATED AND DISMISSED

The parties notified the court they reached an agreement resolving the issues in this

appeal and requested the appeal be abated until January 1, 2013. On November 2, 2012, the court

granted appellant’s unopposed motion to abate this appeal

. We now reinstate the appeal on the

docket of the court and, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, vacate the trial court’s judgment

without regard to the merits and dismiss the case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); 43.2(e)

. All

costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
### [§406b. Renumbered §476b]
#### § 930.103 Coverage.

This subpart governs agencies in authorizing their employees to operate Government-owned or -leased motor vehicles for official purposes within the States of the Union, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the territories or possessions of the United States and establishes minimum procedures to ensure the safe and efficient operation of such vehicles.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Cell Biology Integrated Review Group; Nuclear and                               ( print page 370)                            Cytoplasmic Structure/Function and Dynamics Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         January 31, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites Hotel, 4300 Military Road, Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jessica Smith, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *jessica.smith6@nih.gov*.                    

This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 18, 2019.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2019-00157 Filed 1-24-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. II-10-081 November 30, 2010

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC STAFF SCHEDULES MEETING WITH SHAW AREVA MOX SERVICES

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE AT MIXED OXIDE FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with officials of 

Shaw Areva MOX Services at 7 p.m. on Thursday, Dec. 16 in Aiken, S.C., to discuss the results 

of the Applicant Performance Review for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility currently 

under construction at the Savannah River site.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in the Aiken Municipal Center, 

215 The Alley in Aiken. NRC officials will be available to answer questions from the public 

after the business portion of the meeting.

The NRC review covered the period from Oct. 1, 2009 to Sept. 30, 2010, and found 

MOX facility construction activities acceptable. The review also determined that the construction 

program was being sufficiently implemented. 

The NRC staff identified design control as an area needing improvement during the 

previous review discussed in Aiken last December. Since then, the agency has conducted 

additional inspections in that area and the company has taken steps to improve performance. The 

NRC did not identify any areas needing improvement during the most recent assessment period. 

The MOX facility, which will be owned by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear 

Security Administration, is part of an effort to make surplus weapons-grade plutonium into more 

proliferation-resistant forms. Converting the plutonium into MOX fuel will enable it to be used 

in commercial reactors to generate electricity. In the United States, only those reactors 

authorized by the NRC will be permitted to use MOX fuel.

The performance review letter for the MOX facility is available on the NRC website at 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The number for that document is ML103210588.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### Eastern States Electrical Contractors, Inc., et al., v. New York Casualty Company.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 875.]
I 

★

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2384

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide an exemption from Interstate System weight limitations for milk hauling vehicles in the State 

of Connecticut. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2003

Mr. SIMMONS (for himself, Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut, Mr. SHAYS, Ms. 

DELAURO, and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide an exemption from Interstate System weight limitations for milk 

hauling vehicles in the State of Connecticut.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM INTERSTATE SYSTEM 

4 WEIGHT LIMITATIONS FOR MILK HAULING 

5 VEHICLES IN CONNECTICUT. 

6 Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The State 

8 of Connecticut may allow, by special permit, on Interstate 
2

HR 2384 IH1S 

1 System highways in the State the operation of vehicles 

2 with a gross vehicle weight of up to 99,000 pounds for 

3 the hauling of milk in liquid form.’’.

Æ
§ 838.735 Cost-of-living adjustments. ( a ) OPM applies cost-of-living adjustments to all former spouse survivor annuities in pay status at the time of the adjustment and in the amount provided by Federal statute.
( b ) OPM will not honor provisions of a court order that alters the time or amount of cost-of-living adjustments or that attempts to prevent OPM from applying cost-of-living adjustments to a former spouse survivor annuity in pay status.
```

CHANGES IN THE UKRAINIAN TAX CODE

by Paul J. Norton

On January 1, 1995, Ukraine implemented a new tax regime as part of its overall
economic reform plan.  Reduced tax rates for both resident and non-resident
companies are now based on profit instead of gross income.  The law on "Taxation
of Profits of Enterprises" [#334-94-BP] also cancels the five year tax holiday for
foreign investments registered after January 1.  Previously registered joint ventures 
will retain all applicable tax holidays provided that the qualified investment was
executed. 

The basic tax rate is now 30 percent of a company's balance profit, with the
exception of gambling activities (60 percent), and brokerage activities and auctions
(45 percent).  Net profit is determined by calculating a company's worldwide
income, including profits from currency assets, securities, royalties, and other
sources of income.  Balance profits are derived from net profit by deducting
corporate bond or dividend payments; property taxes; land taxes; social
maintenance costs (employee day care, medical facilities, etc.); and no more than
4 percent of balance profits for contribution to charitable organizations. 
Deductions can also be taken for production costs and losses.  

For foreign companies, tax rates vary depending on the nature of the business. 
Foreign companies operating in Ukraine can register as resident companies,
including wholly-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures, or as non-residents. 
Resident companies with foreign investment  registered after January 1 are subject
to the new law. 

Non-resident companies with permanent representation are taxed at the rate of 30
percent, which is the same rate levied on Ukrainian residents.  Companies with
permanent representation that repatriate profits derived from economic activity in
Ukraine are also subject to a repatriation tax of 15 percent.    

Passive profits  (dividends from corporative rights, interest from securities and
financial assets trading, profit from financial leasing, insurance, and royalties) of
non-residents without permanent representation in Ukraine, and incomes from 
services (i.e., freight forwarding) provided in Ukraine are also taxed at the rate of
15 percent upon repatriation.

Activities exempted from profit tax include:  production and/or processing of
agricultural products (except producers of  alcoholic beverages, excluding bulk
wine for further processing, tobacco, and fur products); commercial fish farming;
production of protein fodder from animal carcasses.  U.S. companies doing
business in Ukraine should consult with one of the many U.S. accounting or law
firms with experience in Ukraine.  For a list of Western accountants in Ukraine
order document # 6717 from the BISNIS Flashfax;  for a list of Western law firms
operating in Ukraine, order document # 6713.
```
§ 831.1731 Application for full retirement status. ( a ) *Election of full retirement.* ( 1 ) A phased retiree may elect to enter full retirement status at any time by submitting to OPM an application for full retirement in accordance with § 831.104. This includes an election made under § 831.1715(h)(6) in lieu of a mandated return to regular employment status. Upon making such an election, a phased retiree is entitled to a composite retirement annuity.
( 2 ) A phasFERCed retiree may cancel an election of full retirement status and withdraw an application for full retirement by submitting a signed written request with the agency and obtaining the approval of an authorized agency official before the commencing date of the composite retirement annuity.
( b ) *Deemed election of full retirement.* A phased retiree who is separated from phased employment for more than 3 days enters full retirement status. The individual's composite retirement annuity will begin to accrue on the commencing date of the composite annuity as provided in § 831.1732, and payment will be made after he or she submits an application in accordance with § 831.104 for the composite retirement annuity.
( c ) *Survivor election provisions.* An individual applying for full retirement status under this section is subject to the survivor election provisions of subpart F of this part.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Page 8 of 17

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 1999-A

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Bank One, National Association           Banker's Trust Company
Fka, The First National Bank of Chicago  Four Albany Street
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126           New York, New York  10006
Chicago,  IL  60670                      ATTN: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
ATTN: Corporate Trust Administration     Structured Finance
Phone:(312) 407-0192                     Phone:  (212) 250-6501
Fax:(312) 407-1708                       Fax: (212) 250-6349

Key Bank USA, National Association
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH   44114
ATTN:  Senior Vice President
Key Education Resources
Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax:(216) 828-9301



Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller and Administrator, KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
1999-A, and The First National Bank of Chicago (nka, Bank One, National
Association), as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1999 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of PHEAA as Servicer from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000,
and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best
of our knowledge, based on our review, PHEAA as Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                            PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION
                                            ASSISTANCE AGENCY, Servicer

Date:  3/21/01                              By: /s/ Ernest P. Beardsley
                                              --------------------------
                                            Name: Ernest P. Beardsley
                                            Title: Senior Vice President
#### § 890.1021 Determining length of debarment based on failure to furnish information needed to resolve claims.

Debarments under 5 U.S.C. 8902a(d)(3) shall be for a period of 3 years, subject to adjustment based on the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in § 890.1016.
§ 890.1069 Information the debarring official must consider in deciding a provider's contest of proposed penalties and assessments. ( a ) *Documentary material and written arguments.* As part of a provider's contest, the provider must furnish a written statement of reasons why the proposed penalties and assessments should not be imposed and/or why the amounts proposed are excessive.
( b ) *Mandatory disclosures.* In addition to any other information submitted during the contest, the provider must inform the debarring official in writing of: ( 1 ) Any existing, proposed, or prior exclusion, debarment, penalty, assessment, or other sanction that was imposed by a Federal, State, or local government agency, including any administrative agreement that purports to affect only a single agency; and
( 2 ) Any current or prior criminal or civil legal proceeding that was based on the same facts as the penalties and assessments proposed by OPM.
( c ) *In-person appearance.* A provider may request a personal appearance (in person, by telephone conference, or through a representative) to provide testimony and oral arguments to the debarring official.
No. IV-10-028 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 August 5, 2010 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD SEISMIC WORKSHOP SEPTEMBER 8 – 9 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a seismic workshop in San Luis Obispo, 

Calif., Sept. 8 - 9 to share information about seismic hazard and its application to the safe operation 

of nuclear power plants. 

The workshop will be held from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Sept. 8, and from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. on Sept 9, at 

the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Road, San Luis Obispo. 

“We know there is a great deal of interest in the community about seismic issues and how 

they relate to the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant,” NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. 

Collins said. “The workshop will provide an opportunity for people to hear from a wide range of 

experts in the field and ask questions of the presenters.” 

The first day of the workshop will focus on fundamental concepts of seismic hazard 

including the science employed to measure and monitor geologic conditions, and the methods used 

to translate data into commercial nuclear plant design specifications. The second day will focus on 

seismic hazard information specific to the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in San Luis Obispo, 

including the history of seismic reviews at the site and a briefing on current seismic studies. 

Invited guests will address topics including: an explanation of the science of seismology and 

how it is used to design buildings and other structures in geologically active areas; state of the art 

techniques for identifying and profiling faults; nuclear power plant seismic monitoring programs; 

and the state of current seismic studies involving Diablo Canyon. 

 Guests include officials from the California Energy Commission, Cal Poly University, 

Berkeley University of California, the California Geological Society; the Geological Society of 

America, Southern California Edison Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Co., the U.S. Geological Survey, 

the University of California at Santa Barbara, and the NRC. 

 

 The workshop agenda and free on-line registration is available at: www.nrc.gov. 

 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
Exhibit 10.70



 



Exhibit 10.75


ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     This Addendum (the “Addendum”) is made effective as of the 12th day of
December, 2003 and is intended to amend a certain Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”) by and between Erie Indemnity Company and Douglas F. Ziegler
effective as of December 15, 1999.


     WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of the
Company and its Shareholders to secure the continued employment of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of December
9, 2003 has again agreed to extend the term of the Agreement for a period of
one (1) additional year as contained herein; and


     WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.


     NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as
follows:


     1.     Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with respect to the Term is hereby amended
by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2005.


     2.     All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ATTEST:
	 	ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/
	 	Jan R. Van Gorder
	 	By:  
	/s/  	F. William Hirt
	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	Jan R. Van Gorder
	 	 	 	F. William Hirt
	 	 	 	 	Secretary
	 	 	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	WITNESS:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/	 	Cori Coccarelli
	 	 
	/s/
	Douglas F. Ziegler
	 	 	

	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	Cori Coccarelli
	 	 	 	Douglas F. Ziegler
	 	 	 	 	Executive Secretary
	 	 	 	378 Ridgeview Drive
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Erie, PA 16505




47