alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-11-006 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 January 26, 2011

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS PG&E DIGITAL UPGRADE 

PROPOSAL AT THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Feb. 3 to discuss Pacific 

Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) proposal to perform a digital upgrade of the Diablo Canyon 

Power Plant’s instrumentation and control protection system. Diablo Canyon is a nuclear plant 

located near San Luis Obispo, Calif. 

 

 The meeting will be held from 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. at the PG&E Energy Center, 6588 Ontario 

Road, San Luis Obispo. Members of the public will have an opportunity to ask questions of the 

NRC staff at the meeting. 

Diablo Canyon’s reactor is protected by circuitry that will automatically and safely shut 

down the plant and activate other safety systems in the case of a malfunction. Currently this is an 

analog system. In order for PG&E to perform the digital upgrade, it would be required to apply to 

NRC for a license amendment. 

PG&E has not applied for a license amendment yet. The purpose of the meeting is to provide 

the NRC staff with detailed information on the company’s digital upgrade plan. 

If NRC approves the plan to proceed, Diablo Canyon would be one of a few plants in the 

country to convert from analog to digital controls for its reactor protection system. 

 

 ### 

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
#### In the Matter of the Estate of George Vargo, Deceased. Mary Vargo, Appellant; Mary Doyle, Respondent.

Decedent was married to Anna Hluska, in Brooklyn, on January 16, 1910. Respondent, born July 13, 1912, is the only living issue of that marriage. Decedent did not live with his first wife since 1913. About that time he took up residence with appellant, to whom he was formally married on January 17, 1922, in Pennsylvania. There are four children of decedent’s second marriage. Decedent’s first wife died on January *70222, 1934. There is no testimony that decedent lived with appellant after that date. Decedent died on September 2, 1952. Appellant, claiming to be decedent’s widow, petitioned for letters of administration. Respondent filed objections on the ground that appellant was not the widow and that she (respondent) was entitled to letters as the only issue of decedent’s first marriage. Temporary letters were issued to appellant on October 31, 1952. After hearing, the Surrogate entered a decree revoking the temporary letters issued on October 31, 1952, and appointing respondent as administratrix. The Surrogate held that decedent’s second marriage on January 17, 1922, was invalid under subdivision 3 of section 6 of the Domestic Relations Law as it existed at the time of that marriage (i.e., prior to its amendment by L. 1922, ch. 279) because decedent knew that his first wife was living and could have located her had he wished to do so. Decree, of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, unanimously affirmed, without costs. We do not adopt the reasoning of the Surrogate. The second marriage took place in Pennsylvania, and, therefore, the provisions of the New York Domestic Relations Law were not applicable. Although, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there is a presumption of the validity of the second marriage, which was ceremonial, and of the legitimacy of the issue of that marriage, in our opinion, there is evidence in this record to sustain a finding that the first marriage had not been terminated prior to the time the second marriage was contracted. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. [203 Mise. 642.]
Exhibit 10.7(c)

BANK RHODE ISLAND  NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN    AMENDMENT NO. 4

WHEREAS,
Bank Rhode Island (the "Company") established and has maintained the Bank Rhode Island Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan") effective January 1, 1997, to
provide unfunded deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees; and

WHEREAS,
the Company has maintained the right to amend the Plan from time to time; and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to clarify that the Plan include employees of the Company's subsidiaries;

NOW
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Fourth Amendment this18thday of December, 2007.

| |  |        |  |                      
| |  | ------ |  | ---------------------
| |  |        |  | BANK RHODE ISLAND    
| |  | By:    |  | /s/MERRILL W. SHERMAN
| |  | Title: |  | President & CEO      

---



QuickLinks
SHIPPING TO SIBERIA: IT CAN BE DONE

----

**Decembe 1997/January 1998**
by Jim Whitman
The sheer distance of Siberia from the United States deters many American firms from thisimportant regional market, according to research conducted recently by the American BusinessCenter-Novosibirsk.  At first glance, it seems that U.S. exporters are at a significantdisadvantage when competing with European companies because of distance.  Shipping to Siberiais less daunting than it seems, however, for those willing to adapt to the region's specialcircumstances.
U.S. exporters need to be extremely flexible when shipping goods to Siberia, where goods movevery long distances and seasonal temperatures range between -35 and +35 Celsius.   While mostmajor Siberian cities are located along the Trans-Siberian Railroad, many smaller settlements areonly accessible during the winter months, when the region's many unpaved roads are frozen. Also, because the physical distribution chain is so long, companies are often forced to useairfreight to ensure timely delivery to important customers.  Finally, short-term sales opportunitiesand changing customs requirements require companies to modify their shipping practicesfrequently.
**Ship, Rail, or Road?**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0589

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

MIKEL STETSON LETHERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 27, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 13 2023

01/13/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0589
Form Memorandum Amendment to Existing Stock Option Agreements dated 8/25/2003



 EXHIBIT 10.9 
  
 M E M O R A N D U M 
  

	Date:	 	August 25, 2003 

  

	To:	 	All Ducommun Incorporated Stock Option Holders 

  

	From:	 	Jim Heiser 

  

	Re:	 	Amendment to Existing Stock Option Agreements 

  

  
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved an amendment to all
existing stock option agreements to clarify the definition of “retirement” in Section 5(b) of the stock option agreements. As a result, Section 5(b) of all existing stock option agreements shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following: 
  
 (b) Retirement or Permanent
Disability. If the Option Holder retires or becomes permanently disabled, this option may be exercised (for not more than the number of shares as to which the Option Holder might have exercised this option on the date of his or her retirement or
permanent disability) at any time prior to the Expiration Date. As used herein, “retirement” shall mean the date on which the Option Holder voluntarily terminates his or her employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary with the
permanent intention of not seeking other employment or becoming self-employed except for consulting, part-time employment and such other exceptions as the Committee may determine are appropriate. “Permanent disability” shall mean the date
on which the Option Holder has not worked or been able to work due to physical or mental incapacity for a period of 180 consecutive days. In order to qualify for “retirement,” if requested by the Corporation the Option Holder shall execute
a declaration on the date of the termination of employment with the Corporation or a Subsidiary in such form as the Corporation may reasonably request certifying that he or she meets the definition of “retirement.” If at any time following
retirement, the Option Holder ceases to meet the definition of “retirement” this option may be exercised (for not more than the number of shares as to which the Option Holder might have exercised this option on the date on which his or her
employment was terminated) at any time (i) prior to the Expiration Date in the event the Expiration Date is not more than three months following the date on which he or she ceased to meet the definition of “retirement,” or (ii) within such
three-month period, in the event that the Expiration Date is more than three months following the date on which the Option Holder ceased to meet the definition of “retirement.” 
  
 To confirm your agreement with the foregoing, please sign a copy of this memorandum in the space below and return it to me. 
  

							
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:	 	 	 	 
			
	
	 	Date:	 	

			
	
	 	 	 	 
	[Print Name]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28165]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, January 8, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC.

STATUS: This Meeting Will be Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Additional Information:
    This meeting will be cancelled if the Commission is not open due to 
a funding lapse.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Laura E. Sinram,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-28165 Filed 12-21-18; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
### §140503. Membership

(a) Active Members.—An individual is eligible for active membership in the corporation if the individual—

(1) is of good moral character; and

(2) has received the Purple Heart for wounds received as a member, of any rank, of the Armed Forces of the United States or any foreign country during military or naval combat against an armed enemy of the United States.

(b) Associate Members.—The corporation may extend eligibility for membership as associate members to the parents, spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants of an individual described in subsection (a) of this section on terms provided in its constitution and bylaws.

(c) Voting.—Each member described in subsection (a) of this section has one vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of the members.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1382; Pub. L. 110–207, §2, Apr. 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 719.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140503 | 36:826. | Aug. 26, 1958, Pub. L. 85–761, §6, 72 Stat. 857. |

Section

In this section, the text of 36:826(d) is omitted as obsolete.

In subsection (a), the words "has received" are substituted for "who have received or who may hereafter receive", and the words "as a member" are substituted for "are, have been, or may become members", for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b), the word "may" is substituted for "shall have the power, moreover, to" for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–207 substituted "the parents, spouse, siblings, and lineal descendants" for "parents and lineal descendants".
### §505. Opinions of Attorney General

The Secretary may require the opinion of the Attorney General on any question of law arising in the administration of the Department.

(Added Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 387.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 505 to 508 were renumbered sections 1505 to 1508 of this title, respectively.

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 211(b) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–83, §2(a).
Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 19, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01367-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.B., a child 

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. JD-10-103-X 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

By letter dated December 9, 2014, the Court raised a question concerning its jurisdiction 

over this appeal. Specifically, the orders appellant identified in her notice of appeal as the orders 

she wished to appeal were the trial court’s October 20, 2014 temporary orders in this suit 

affecting the parent-child relationship. To date appellant has not responded to the Court’s 

jurisdictional inquiry. Accordingly, we address our jurisdiction sua sponte, as we must. M.O. 

Dental Lab. v. Rape, 139 S.W.3d 671, 673 (Tex. 2004) (per curiam). 

This court may entertain appeals only from final judgments or interlocutory orders 

authorized by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Tex. R. 

App. P. 28.1(a). Pursuant to the Family Code, temporary orders cannot be appealed. TEX. FAM.

CODE ANN. § 105.001(e). Absent an appealable interlocutory order or final judgment, this court 

has no jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ogletree v. Matthews, 262 S.W.3d 316, 319 n. 1 (Tex. 

2007); Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195; Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 
 –2– 

895 (Tex. 1966). For that reason, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(a). 

 

141367F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.B., a child 

No. 05-14-01367-CV 

 On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. JD-10-103-X. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want 

of jurisdiction. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee DALLAS COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES 

 recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ANGELINA BRASHEAR AKA ANGELINA 

MARIE RICHARDSON 

Judgment entered this 19th day of February, 2015.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ikanos
Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Michael A. Ricci, Chief Executive Officer
and President of the Company, and Cory J. Sindelar, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                      |  |                             |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                      |  | IKANOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|                      |  |                            
|Dated: August 3, 2007 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ MICHAEL A. RICCI                        
|                      |  |                             |  | Michael Ricci                               
|                      |  |                             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                      |  |                             |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                      |  |                            
|Dated: August 3, 2007 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ CORY J. SINDELAR                        
|                      |  |                             |  | Cory J. Sindelar                            
|                      |  |                             |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                      |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of BAS Consulting, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, B. Alva
Schoomer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ B. Alva Schoomer
--------------------
B. Alva Schoomer
Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

December 13, 2004
EXHIBIT
32.1





ENABLE
HOLDINGS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enable Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Enable Holdings,
Inc.




Date:
      November 20, 2009
                  
                  /s/
      Jeffrey D. HoffmanBy:
      Jeffrey D. HoffmanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
Addendum to NAHB Ex Parte Memo Regarding DOE Participation in IECC Development

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is including the attached statements as an addendum to an ex 

parte memo submitted by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) regarding a September 24, 

2014 meeting to discuss DOE participation in International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 

development. In this meeting, DOE representatives explained how it produces code change proposals 

for the IECC, and participates in the International Code Council (ICC) code development process. 

In the ex parte memo dated September 30, 2013, NAHB included statements describing how DOE 

intends to exercise voting privileges in the upcoming ICC Public Comment Hearings that will result in the 

2015 IECC. These statements were identified by NAHB as a “DOE Policy Announcement (Re: Code 

Development).” DOE wishes to clarify these statements, in that Dr. Kathleen Hogan’s response 

indicated that DOE intended to participate in the ICC Public Comment Hearings in a matter consistent 

with the previously issued Federal Register Notice (78 FR 23550). Based on this guidance, DOE will focus 

on its own proposals; as well those related to a DOE proposal or published technical analysis.
Z. C

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Nov 30, 2006 .09:-54

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

LTR-06-0604

EDO

GOV Kathleen Sebelius

KS-GOV

Dale Klein

LOGGING DATE: 11/30/2006

g e ' EDO

D.DMRS

DEDR

DEDIA

AO

SUBJECT: State ltr of compliance with provisions of section 651 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

Appropriate

RF

11/20/2006

No

Made publicly available in ADAMS via EDO/DPC

NOTES:

FILE-LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
m

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, GOVERNOR

November 20, 2006

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D.

Chairman, United States NuclearRegulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 651 (e) of the Energy Policy Act of

2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials

now defined as by-product material in Sections 1 le.(3) and 1 le.(4) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended.

In 1965, the State of Kansas entered into an Agreement with the Commission under Section 274b. of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that Agreement, the State of Kansas licenses byproduct

material as defined in Section l1 e. (1) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, the State (Commonwealth)

licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct

material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the program for

licensing lIe. (1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the licensing program that

would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy. Further, we intend to continue to license the new

byproduct material under this same program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the State of Kansas has a program for licensing byproduct

material, as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section lie. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, that is adequate to protect the public health and safety, and that the State intends to continue to

implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication on the NRC's Plan for the Transition of

Regulato Authori Resultin from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material.

Respectfully,

C : '

Kathleen Sebelius 7j:,

Governor of the State of Kansas -T

Capitol, 300 SW lOth Ave., Ste. 212S, Topeka, KS 66612-1590

Voice 785-296-3232 Fax 785-296-7973 www.ksgovernor.org governorgstate.ks.us