alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 9801.106 Use and collection of social security numbers. ( a ) *No denial of right, benefit, or privilege.* Individuals may not be denied any right, benefit, or privilege as a result of refusing to provide their social security numbers, unless the collection is required by Federal statute; and
( b ) *Notification to individual.* Individuals requested to provide their social security numbers must be informed of: ( 1 ) Whether providing social security numbers is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) The statutory or regulatory authority that authorizes the collection of social security numbers; and
( 3 ) The uses that will be made of the numbers.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6428

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCEL RANSOM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR99-250-CCB, CA-01-3401-CCB) Submitted: July 2, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcel Ransom, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* To the extent Ransom seeks to raise for the first time on appeal issues not properly presented to the district court, we find they are waived. SeeMuth v. United States , 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding claims raised for first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances). 2 PER CURIAM: Marcel Ransom seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a motion under § 2255 unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Ransom has not made the requisite showing. * See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### **CHAPTER 1541—NAVAL SEA CADET CORPS**

Sec.
154101.
Organization.
154102.
Purposes.
154103.
Membership.
154104.
Governing body.
154105.
Powers.
154106.
Exclusive right to name, insignia, emblems, badges, marks, and words.
154107.
Restrictions.
154108.
Principal office.
154109.
Records and inspection.
154110.
Service of process.
154111.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
154112.
Annual report.
154113.
Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation.
EXHIBIT 31.1

<PAGE>

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Carl Urich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Global  Envirotech,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)  presented  in  this  quarterly   report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 1, 2004


/s/ Carl Urich
------------------------
 Carl Urich, CEO & CFO
### §154502. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Navy Wives Clubs of America (in this chapter, the "corporation"), incorporated in California, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1435.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154502(a) | 36:2801. | Oct. 19, 1984, Pub. L. 98–520, §§1, 15 (last sentence), 16, 98 Stat. 2428, 2430. |
| 154502(b) | 36:2814 (last sentence).36:2815. | |

Section

36:2815.

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2368

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax the campaign committees 

of candidates for State and local public office in the same manner 

as campaign committees of candidates for Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2003

Mr. GREEN of Texas (for himself, Mr. REYES, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. GONZALEZ, 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. SANDLIN, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. TURNER of Texas, Mr. 

FROST, Mr. BELL, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. 

DOGGETT, and Mr. HALL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to tax the 

campaign committees of candidates for State and local 

public office in the same manner as campaign committees 

of candidates for Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2368 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULE FOR PRINCIPAL 

2 CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES TO CANDIDATES 

3 FOR STATE OR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 527(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

6 to principal campaign committee defined) is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘or for State or local public of8 fice’’ after ‘‘a candidate for Congress’’, and 

9 (2) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘in the case of a 

10 candidate for Congress,’’ before ‘‘section 302(e)’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Kevin R. Griffith, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IDI Global, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.







Date: April 20, 2006

/s/ Kevin R. Griffith

Kevin R. Griffith, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 24

                    TAUBER AND BALSER, P.C.
                 Certified Public Accountants
                   3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                         Suite 250
                     Atlanta, GA 30326


                INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

As independent auditors of Innovative Coatings Corporation ("ICC"), we
hereby consent to the incorporation in the Form 10-KSB, Amendment No. 1 to
be filed on or about November 20, 2001 of our report dated April 26, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of ICC as of December 31, 2000,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000
and 1999.

/s/ Tauber and Balser, P.C.
------------------------------
Tauber and Balser, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
November 20, 2001
### §30309. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members, directors, and officers.

(b) Inspection.—A member, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1319.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30309 | 36:863. | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §13, 72 Stat. 926. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and DALY

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Randolph T. HOPE

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202300125

_________________________

Decided: 20 December 2023

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Yong J. Lee

Sentence adjudged 3 March 2023 by a special court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction 

to E-1, confinement for six months, forfeiture of $1,278.00 pay per 

month for six months, and a bad-conduct discharge.1

1 We note that the military judge’s initial announcement regarding adjudged forfeiture of pay was inconsistent with Rule for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 1003(b)(2) and 

that the subsequent correction was discussed via email rather than at a post-trial Article 39(a), Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ] session, as prescribed in R.C.M. 

1104(b)(1)(C). However, we find no prejudice to Appellant. 
United States v. Hope, NMCCA No. 202300125

Opinion of the Court

2

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Commander Doug Ottenwess, JAGC, USN

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON

Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PILOT PROGRAM FOR ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW STATE MEDICAL SCHOOLS
### SUBCHAPTER IV—EXPANSION OF DEPARTMENT HOSPITAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING CAPACITY

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §4(a)(3), (4), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404, substituted "DEPARTMENT" for "VETERANS' ADMINISTRATION".
Agency Spotlight

----
### §230508. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director, officer, or member during the life of the charter granted by this chapter. This subsection does not prevent the payment of reasonable compensation to an officer or reimbursement for actual necessary expenses in amounts approved by the board of directors.

(c) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, or employee.

(d) Claim of Governmental Approval or Authority.—The corporation may not claim congressional approval or the authority of the United States Government for any of its activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1487.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230508(a) | 36:3809(c). | May 23, 1986, Pub. L. 99–318, §9, 100 Stat. 475. |
| 230508(b) | 36:3809(a). | |
| 230508(c) | 36:3809(b). | |
| 230508(d) | 36:3809(d). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the words "No part of" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to", the words "the charter granted by this chapter" are substituted for "this charter", and the words "This subsection does not prevent" are substituted for "Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent", for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (d), the words "by virtue of this chapter" are omitted as unnecessary.
BISNIS Trades & Tenders, January 20, 1998

----

INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S.DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 1997.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITEDSTATES.
THE BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICE FOR THE NEWLY INDEPENDENT STATES (BISNIS)HAS CREATED THE BISNIS TRADES AND TENDERS ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER TO HELP U.S.COMPANIES FIND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE EXPANDING MARKETS OF THE NEWLYINDEPENDENT STATES (NIS) OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.
THESE OPPORTUNITIES ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN INFORMATIONAL SERVICE AND DONOT REPRESENT AN ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.VERIFICATION OF LEADS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE READER. BISNIS MAY CONSIDEROTHER PRIVATE SECTOR-GENERATED TRADE LEADS AND TENDERS, IN ELECTRONIC FORMONLY, AND PUBLISH ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE BASIS. PLEASE SEND YOUR LEADS TO[email protected]
§ 1830.5 Requirements for requesting amendment of records. ( a ) *Submission of requests.* Individuals may request amendment of records pertaining to them that are subject to amendment under the Privacy Act and this part. The request must be sent: ( 1 ) *By email to: foiarequest@osc.gov ;* or
( 2 ) *By mail to:* Chief Privacy Officer, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, 1730 M Street NW, Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-4505.
( 3 ) Both the request letter and envelope or email should be clearly marked “Privacy Act Amendment Request.” Whether sent by mail or email, a Privacy Act amendment request is considered received by OSC when it reaches the Chief Privacy Officer.
( b ) *Description of amendment sought.* Requests for amendment should include the identification of the records together with a statement of the basis for the requested amendment and all available supporting documents and materials. The request needs to articulate whether information should be added, deleted, or substituted with another record and clearly articulate the reason for believing that the record should be corrected or amended.
( c ) *Proof of identity.* Rules and procedures set forth in § 1830.3 apply to requests made under this section.
( d ) *Acknowledgement and response.* Requests for amendment shall be acknowledged by OSC no later than ten (10) business days after receipt by the Chief Privacy Officer and a determination on the request shall be made promptly.
( e ) *What will not change.* The Privacy Act amendment or correction process will not be used to alter, delete, or amend information which is part of a determination of fact or which is evidence received in the record of a claim in any form of an administrative appeal process. Disagreements with these determinations are to be resolved through the assigned OSC Program Office.
( f ) *Notice of error.* If the record is wrong, OSC will correct it promptly. If wrong information was disclosed from the record, we will tell those of whom we are aware received that information that it was wrong and will give them the correct information. This will not be necessary if the change is not due to an error—e.g., a change of name or address.
( g ) *Record found to be correct.* If the record is correct, OSC will inform the requestor in writing of the reason why we refuse to amend the record, the right to appeal the refusal, and the name and address of the official to whom the appeal should be sent.
( h ) *Record of another government agency.* If you request OSC to correct or amend a record governed by the regulation of another government agency, we will forward your request to such government agency for processing and we will inform you in writing of the referral.
**Exhibit 15.3**

[Letterhead of Maples and Calder] 

NetEase.com, Inc. 

26/F, SP Tower D 

Tsinghua Science Park Building 8 

No. 1 Zhongguancun East Road 

Haidian District, Beijing 100084, 

People’s Republic of China 

26 June 2008 

Dear Sirs 

**Re: NetEase.com, Inc.** (the “**Company**”)

We have acted as legal advisors as to the laws of the Cayman Islands to the Company, an exempted limited liability company incorporated in the CaymanIslands, in connection with the filing by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of an annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

We hereby consent to the reference of our name under the headings “Taxation” and “Enforcement of Civil Liabilities” in the Form 20-F.

Yours faithfully 

*/s/ Maples and Calder*

Maples and Calder
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, John McLeod, the President, Secretary,
Treasurer and a director of California Oil & Gas Corporation, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil &
Gas Corporation for the period ended February 29, 2008 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
California Oil & Gas Corporation.

Dated April 21, 2008.

/s/ John McLeod 
  John McLeod
  President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director 
  (Principal Executive Officer)

---
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.23

The New York & Harlem Railroad Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 8087