alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. I-10-027 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

May 20, 2010 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS SPENT FUEL STORAGE PLANS FOR SALEM NUCLEAR PLANT 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of PSEG Nuclear, 

LLC, on Thursday, May 27 to discuss the company’s upcoming plans for the dry cask storage of 

spent nuclear fuel at the Salem nuclear power plant in Hancocks Bridge (Salem County), N.J. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC’s 

Region I Office, which is located at 475 Allendale Road in King of Prussia, Pa. There will be an 

opportunity for members of the public in attendance to ask questions of NRC staff regarding the 

topic prior to the session’s adjournment. 

 Nuclear power plants have two options for the storage of spent nuclear fuel: It can be 

stored in a plant’s circulating-water spent fuel pool or in dry cask storage, which involves 

removing fuel from the pool, placing it in a stainless-steel cask and then moving that cask to a 

large steel-reinforced concrete vault located outside on plant grounds. 

 PSEG intends to move fuel from its Salem nuclear power plant to the site’s dry cask 

storage facility, which is also known as an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, or ISFSI, 

later this year. The two-reactor Salem plant shares the ISFSI with an adjoining plant, the singlereactor Hope Creek unit, also owned and operated by the company. 

 ### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
### §540. Investigations and improvements; control by Department of the Army; wildlife conservation

Federal investigations and improvements of rivers, harbors, and other waterways shall be under the jurisdiction of and shall be prosecuted by the Department of the Army under the direction of the Secretary of the Army and the supervision of the Chief of Engineers, except as otherwise specifically provided by Act of Congress, which said investigations and improvements shall include a due regard for wildlife conservation.

(June 20, 1938, ch. 535, §1, 52 Stat. 802; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Acts Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 831, 49 Stat. 1028; Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 832, 50 Stat. 844, contained similar provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Waterway Improvements Study and Report; Availability of Data to National Transportation Policy Commission

Pub. L. 94–587, §158, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2933, directed the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to make a comprehensive study and report on the system of waterway improvements under his jurisdiction, including a review of emergency and defense requirements and an appraisal of additional improvements necessary to optimize the system and its intermodal characteristics, and to submit a report to Congress within three years after funds were first appropriated and made available for the study, together with his recommendations. The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, was to make available to the National Transportation Policy Study Commission established by section 154 of Public Law 94–280 [set out as a note under section 101 of Title 23, Highways], the information and other data developed as a result of the study.

#### Reimbursement of States for Water Resources Projects; Study

Pub. L. 89–298, title III, §314, Oct. 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 1096, authorized the Secretary of the Army, through the Chief of Engineers, to study the need for and feasibility of Federal reimbursement of certain public entities for their expenses incurred in connection with authorized projects for improvements of rivers, harbors, and certain other waterways, for various purposes, and to submit a report to Congress no later than Jan. 31, 1967, together with his recommendations in connection therewith.
§ 870.205 Amount of Optional insurance. ( a ) Option A coverage is $10,000. Effective for pay periods beginning on or after October 30, 1998, Option A cannot exceed this amount. Exception: This does not apply to annuitants who retired with a higher amount of Option A before the removal of the maximum on Basic insurance (the first pay period beginning on or after October 30, 1998).
( b ) ( 1 ) Option B coverage comes in 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 multiples of an employee's annual pay (after the pay has been rounded to the next higher thousand, if not already an even thousand). Effective for pay periods beginning on or after October 30, 1998, there is no maximum amount for each multiple. Note:
If an employee's pay is “capped” by law, the amount of the Option B insurance is based on the capped amount, which is the amount the employee is actually being paid. It is not based on the amount the employee's pay would have been without the pay cap.
( 2 ) The amount of Option B coverage automatically changes whenever annual pay is increased or decreased by an amount sufficient to raise or lower pay to a different $1,000 bracket.
( c ) Effective April 24, 1999, Option C coverage comes in 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 multiples of the following amounts: $5,000 on the death of a spouse and $2,500 on the death of an eligible child. Payments are made to the insured individual.
[62 FR 48731, Sept. 17, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 72461, Dec. 28, 1999; 75 FR 60577, Oct. 1, 2010]
# L_2017270EN.01001901.xml

| 19.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 51/2016

of 18 March 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1881]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1139 of 13 July 2015 amending Directive 2012/9/EU as regards the date for its transposition and the deadline for the end of the transitional period (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1139 of 13 July 2015 amending Directive 2012/9/EU as regards the date for its transposition and the deadline for the end of the transitional period (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in the first indent of point 3 (Directive 2001/37/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 L 1139: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1139 of 13 July 2015 (OJ L 185, 14.7.2015, p. 15). |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 L 1139: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1139 of 13 July 2015 (OJ L 185, 14.7.2015, p. 15).

The provisions of Directive (EU) 2015/1139 shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptations:

In Article 1(1) the words “
  20 May 2016
  ” shall, as regards the EFTA States, read “the date of the entry into force of the EEA Joint Committee Decision incorporating Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council into the EEA Agreement”.

In Article 1(2) the words “
  20 May 2017
  ” shall, as regards the EFTA States, read “one year after the date of the entry into force of the EEA Joint Committee Decision incorporating Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council into the EEA Agreement”.’.

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/1139 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 19 March 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 18 March 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 185, 14.7.2015, p. 15.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

          We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No's. 333-48346, 333-34970, 333-37868 and
333-37870) of Pure Resources, Inc., formerly referred to as Union Oil's Permian
Basin business unit, of our report dated March 10, 2000 relating to the
consolidated financial statements which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
July 26, 2002
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00208-CR

KHIRY DESHAWN TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 30th District Court

of Wichita County (61,662-A)

May 11, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
§ 894.704 What happens if I retire and then come back to work for the Federal Government or the United States Postal Service? ( a ) If you have FEDVIP coverage as an *annuitant,* and you become reemployed in an eligible position in Federal service or United States Postal Service, you must contact the *Administrator* so it can send the request for allotments to your agency so your agency can start making the allotments from your pay.
( b ) If you did not enroll in FEDVIP coverage as an *annuitant* and become reemployed in an eligible Federal position or United States Postal Service, you have 60 *days* to enroll in FEDVIP.
( c ) If you enroll as an *employee* the *Administrator* will stop sending requests for allotments from your annuity.
( d ) If your reemployment terminates, you must notify the *Administrator* within 30 days to have your allotments withheld from your annuity payments. Otherwise, your FEDVIP coverage will terminate due to non-payment of premiums.
[73 FR 50184, Aug. 26, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 47749, July 25, 2023]
Submitted on record and briefs October 6,

reversed and remanded December 6, 2000

#### ANGEL SEGURA, *Appellant, v.*Joan PALMATEER, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Respondent.*

(99C-18628; CA A108413)

15 P3d 99

Tomina Carter filed the brief for appellant.

Kelly Knivila filed the brief for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Kistler, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*332PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from the trial court’s *sua sponte*dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. He argues that the petition contains factual allegations that are sufficient both to bring his claim within the holding of *Peek v. Thompson,*160 Or App 260, 980 P2d 178, *rev dismissed*329 Or 553 (1999), and to show that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the decision of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision to extend his parole release date under the applicable administrative rule. The state concedes that the trial court erred, and we agree.

Reversed and remanded.
# Continuation of Emergency Regarding Weapons of Mass 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, President Clinton declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 to amend Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering such weapons. Because the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2004. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 04-24951

Billing code 3195-01-P
# L_2019219EN.01002001.xml

| 22.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 206/2017

of 27 October 2017

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1369]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 2017 amending Annex III to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the hazardous property HP 14 ‘Ecotoxic’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 2017 amending Annex III to Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the hazardous property HP 14 ‘Ecotoxic’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 32ff (Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 0997: Council Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 2017 (OJ L 150, 14.6.2017, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 0997: Council Regulation (EU) 2017/997 of 8 June 2017 (OJ L 150, 14.6.2017, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/997 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 October 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 150, 14.6.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Earl S. GORDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheila SHETHS, M.D.; Ronald Peterson, CEO; The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-1098.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 25, 2002.

Decided May 6, 2002.

Earl S. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. M. Natalie McSherry, Catherine Whitehurst Steiner, Tracy A. Cannon, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Earl S. Gordon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Gordon v. Sheths,*No. CA-01-2878-MJG (D. Md. filed Jan. 8, 2002 & entered Jan. 9, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



1. Base Salary; Incentive Compensation . th
 2. Status of Existing Employment Agreement .




---



##### 



3. Chairman Emeritus Service .
 4. Payment For CE Service .
 5. Tax Compliance Delay .
 6. Disability; Death .
 2




---



##### 



th
 7. Benefits Matters .
 a.
 b.
 8. Restricted Activities .
 a.
 b.
 3




---



##### 



Sincerely,
Levitt and Sons, LLCBy:
    /s/ Alan B. LevanName:
    Alan B. LevanTitle:
    Chairman  /s/
Elliott M. Wiener
 8/17/06
 4
Exhibit 13.1




Certification


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Global Sources Ltd. (the “Company”) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the periods covered by such Report.




Dated:  April 26, 2012




/s/ Merle A. Hinrichs

Merle A. Hinrichs,

Director and Executive Chairman





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350(a) and (b)), is not a part of the Form 20-F to which it refers and is, to the extent permitted by law, provided by the above signatory to the extent of his knowledge.




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO GLOBAL SOURCES LTD. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY GLOBAL SOURCES. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned officer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)            the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, as amended, (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Sign:                                 | /S/   Richard A. Smith |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                      |                                  |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |                                  |
| November 13, 2006                |                                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Bravo Resources Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Daniel  Savino,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in  the Report fairly  presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ DANIEL SAVINO
------------------------------------------
Daniel Savino
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of Security With Advanced Technology,
Inc., (the Company) for the quarter ended September  30, 2006, each of
the undersigned Thomas Marinelli, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey
G. McGonegal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                         |                                                                                                                              
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 
                   
                   
Date: November 14, 2006 | By: /s/ Thomas Marinelli
Thomas Marinelli
Chief Executive Officer
 By: /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
      Chief Financial Officer

*   *   *   *   *

A signed original of the written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.