alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2289

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for projects 

to construct fences or other barriers to prevent public access to tracks 

and other hazards of fixed guideway systems in residential areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 2, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to make grants 

for projects to construct fences or other barriers to prevent public access to tracks and other hazards of fixed 

guideway systems in residential areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railway Safety Act 

5 of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2289 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PUBLIC ACCESS TO TRACKS AND OTHER HAZARDS 

2 OF FIXED GUIDEWAY SYSTEMS IN RESIDEN3 TIAL AREAS. 

4 (a) GRANTS.—The Secretary of Transportation may 

5 make grants to the operator of a rail fixed guideway mass 

6 transportation system that is subject to regulation by the 

7 Federal Transit Administration or the Federal Railroad 

8 Administration for projects to construct fences or other 

9 barriers to prevent public access to tracks and other facili10 ties of the system that may present a hazard in a residen11 tial area. 

12 (b) FEDERAL SHARE.—The Federal share of the cost 

13 of a project carried out with amounts made available 

14 under this section shall not exceed 50 percent. 

15 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

16 authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust 

17 Fund $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2003 to carry out this 

18 section. 

19 (d) APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 23.—Funds authorized 

20 by this section shall be available for obligation in the same 

21 manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 

22 1 of title 23, United States Code; except that subsection 

23 (b) shall apply with respect to the Federal share and such 

24 funds shall remain available until expended.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

EILEEN MCGUIRE,

Petitioner

v.

DONALD RUSSO, DOING BUSINESS AS LAW OFFICES OF DONALD P. RUSSO, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF DONALD P RUSSO, (THE “RUSSO DEFENDANTS”), AND DEIRDRE KAMBER TODD, DOING

BUSINESS AS FITZPATRICK LENTZ & BUBBA P.C., DOING BUSINESS AS KAMBER LAW GROUP, P.C., ALSO KNOWN AS KAMBER LAW GROUP P.C., ESQ., THE KAMBER LAW GROUP P.C.,

FITZPATRICK LENTZ & BUBBA P .C.

, (THE “TODD/FLB DEFENDANTS”),

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 901 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of June , 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is :

Should this Court overturn its decision in Muhammad v. Strassburger, Mckenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick , 587 A.2d 1346 (Pa. 1991), which bars legal malpractice suits following the settlement of a lawsuit absent an allegation of fraud, even in instances where an attorney’s neglig ence led to a lesser settlement.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 67460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10644]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Imported 
for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Visiting Masterpiece: Juan de Mesa's 
Saint Louis of France'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object to be included in the exhibition 
``Visiting Masterpiece: Juan de Mesa's Saint Louis of France,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Art Institute of 
Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about January 17, 2019, until on 
or about December 17, 2020, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52213731263b3d3c6066676b1221263326377c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24574147504d4b4a1610111d6457504550410a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-21 of December 14, 2018.

Jennifer Z. Galt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-28228 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. II-10-036 April 27, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO AREVA NP NUCLEAR FUEL 

PROCESSING FACILITY IN RICHLAND, WASH. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Areva NP’s 

nuclear fuel processing facility in Richland, Wash., which has agreed to a series of corrective 

actions related to materials safety. 

The settlement was achieved under the NRC’s Alternative Dispute Resolution process, 

which was initiated at the request of Areva NP to address a willful violation of a facility safety 

procedure. On Jan. 6, the NRC notified Areva that an agency investigation determined that a 

plant employee had willfully defeated the function of a tool relied upon for safety. 

 The tool, an electronic sensor known as a vacuum wand interlock, is used to transfer 

uranium powder from a drum into the plant’s processing system. During the powder processing, 

operators must block the wand’s eye with their body to activate the vacuum transfer system. The 

employee deliberately bypassed the tool’s safety function on April 21, 2009 by taping the wand’s 

eye, violating an operating procedure. Even though the wand was used improperly, sufficient 

safety controls to prevent accident scenarios remained in place. 

A mediation session was held on March 9 and a settlement was reached. A Confirmatory 

Order, issued Monday, outlines a number of corrective actions and enhancements Areva NP has 

agreed to take. Among the required actions are to communicate the facts of the incident and 

lessons learned internally and to all Areva special nuclear materials licensed facilities. All Areva 

U.S. fuel employees are to receive supplemental safety training incorporating the lessons 

learned. 

As outlined in the order, the NRC agreed to refrain from issuing a Notice of Violation, a 

civil penalty or taking any other enforcement action. The company took disciplinary action 

against the employee involved in the incident and that employee is no longer employed at the 

facility. 

Copies of the enforcement action will be posted on the NRC web site at 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CERTIFICATIONS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levitt Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan B. Levan, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Alan B. LevanName: Alan B. LevanTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 12, 2004
Armenia's Emerging Banking System

----

**November 1998**
by George Isayan
Although the banking sector in Armenia is small, it is one of the most advanced and efficientsectors of the economy.  As of July 1, 1998, the total capital of commercial banks in Armenia was 19.0 billiondram (US$38million).  These banks are considerably stronger now than in 1995.  Of course, Armenian banksdo not yet provideall the types of financial services generally provided by Western banks.  However, competitionand closesupervision by the Central Bank of Armenia are pushing more banks towards meetinginternational standards. U.S. companies doing business in Armenia should become familiar with the capabilities,regulations, andlimitations of the country's banking sector as part of preparations for entering the market. 
Armenia's banking sector is comprised of the Central Bank, the state-controlled Savings Bank,and 31private commercial banks with more than 200 branches on the territory of Armenia. The CentralBank of Armeniaconducts national monetary policy, issues the national currency, the dram, and grants licenses toindividuals ororganizations engaged in banking and money exchange operations. 
A series of laws passed between 1993 and 1996 has established operational procedures andregulations forbanks in Armenia. By law, the minimal charter capital of the bank must be 50 million dram(US$100,000). Currently, banks must have a minimum of US$600,000 (equivalent in dram) in total bank capital. As of January1, 1999, that amount must be US$800,000 (equivalent in dram), and as of January 1, 2000, US$1million(equivalent in dram).
The government owns shares in three commercial banks: Ardshinbank, Armeconombank, andArmagrobank. Foreign banks are represented by Midland Armenia Bank (member of the HSBCGroup,UK), Rossiysky Kredit Armenia (Russia), Menatep-Yerevan (Russia), and Mellat Bank (Iran). The numberof private banks has decreased by over 40 in the last three years as the Central Bank has pursued apolicy oftightening bank capitalization requirements and pushing weak and undercapitalized banks intoclosing or intomerging with stronger banks.  Meanwhile, the Central Bank of Armenia has joined Swift, thewidely acceptedinternational system for wire transfers, and has provided nine Armenian commercial banks(Ardshinbank,Armagrobank, Armimpexbank, Armeconombank, Credit-Yerevan, Armenian Development,Ineko,Converse, and Shirakinvest) with linkage to Swift through a terminal based at the Central Bank.
**Basic Services and Bank Cards**
B.C.D. 02-74

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company

Mount Hood Railway Company

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company

Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company

Spokane International Railroad Company

Des Chutes Railroad Company

OCT 3 0 2002

This is the decision ofthe Railroad Retirement Board regarding the continued

status ofthe following railroads as employers under the Railroad Retirement and 

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts: Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad

Company (B.A. No. 8040), Mount Hood Railway Company (B.A. No. 3628),

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company (B.A. No. 8041), Oregon-Washington

Railroad & Navigation Company (B.A. No. 8038), Spokane International Railroad

Company (B.A. No. 1614), and Des Chutes Railroad Company1.

The above railroads were all merged into the Union Pacific Railroad Company at

the end of December 19872.

Accordingly, the Board holds that Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, 

Mount Hood Railway Company, Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, OregonWashington Railroad & Navigation Company, Spokane International Railroad

Company, and Des Chutes Railroad Company ceased to be employers under the 

Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective with

the close of business on December 31, 1987.

Original signed by:

Cherry1 T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever

1 No B.A. number was assigned to the De Chutes Railroad Company; however, it had been held to be a covered

employer under the Acts.

2 Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company and Des Chutes Railroad Company were merged into the

Oregon Short Line Railroad Company before that company was merged into the Union Pacific.

BA# 1614

.4
Issue Date: 10/20/08 -1- 08-029 

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 08-029 

 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. ________ ________ IMC 0613 10/20/08 

2. ________ ________ IMC 2505 10/20/08 

3. ________ ________ IP 65001.10 10/20/08 

4. ________ ________ IP 65001.19 10/20/08 

5. ________ ________ IP 71303 10/20/08

TRAINING: None 

REMARKS: IMC 0613 (Documenting 10 CFR Part 52 Construction and Test 

Inspections) is issued to provide direction for format and content when 

writing construction inspection reports. 

IMC 2505 (Periodic Assessment of Construction Inspection Program 

Results) is issued to support licensing under 10 CFR Part 52. 

IP 65001.10 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Instrument 

Components and Systems) is issued to support Inspections, Tests, 

Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC)-related inspections under 10 

CFR Part 52. 

IP 65001.19 (Inspection of Installation of ITAAC-Related Radiation 

Monitoring Components and Systems) is issued to support ITAAC-related 

inspections under 10 CFR Part 52. 

IP 71303 (Part 52, Technical Specifications Review) is issued to support 

inspections of operational programs described in IMC 2504, “Construction 

Inspection Program - Non-ITAAC Inspections.” 
Issue Date: 10/20/08 -2- 08-029 

 

 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

 

END
§ 1400.2 Definitions. For the purpose of this part: ( a ) Minority business enterprise means a business which is owned or controlled by one or more socially or economically disadvantaged persons.
( b ) Socially disadvantaged persons means those persons who have been subjected to cultural, racial or ethnic prejudice because of their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual qualities.
( c ) Economically disadvantaged persons means those persons whose ability to compete in the free enterprise system has been impaired due to diminished capital and credit opportunities because of their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual qualities, as compared to others in the same line of business and competitive market area.
( d ) Person means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.
# L_2019023EN.01000101.xml

| 25.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 23/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Japan, of the other part (1)

The European Union and Japan have notified each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Japan, of the other part, on 21 December 2018. Consequently, Japan and the Union may provisionally apply mutually determined provisions of the Agreement in accordance with (Article 47(2)) as from 1 February 2019.

By virtue of Article 4 of Council Decision (EU) 2018/1197 of 26 June 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement, the following parts of the Agreement shall be applied provisionally between the Union and Japan:

| (a) | Articles 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 40 and 41; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Articles 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 40 and 41;

| (b) | Article 13, Article 15 (with the exception of point (b) of paragraph 2), Articles 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31 and 37, Article 38(1) and Article 39 to the extent that they cover matters for which the Union has already exercised its competence internally; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Article 13, Article 15 (with the exception of point (b) of paragraph 2), Articles 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31 and 37, Article 38(1) and Article 39 to the extent that they cover matters for which the Union has already exercised its competence internally;

| (c) | Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(1) to the extent that they cover matters falling within the Union's competence to define and implement a common foreign and security policy; |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(1) to the extent that they cover matters falling within the Union's competence to define and implement a common foreign and security policy;

| (d) | Article 42 (with the exception of point (c) of paragraph 2), Articles 43-47, Article 48(3) and Articles 49, 50 and 51 to the extent that these provisions are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Article 42 (with the exception of point (c) of paragraph 2), Articles 43-47, Article 48(3) and Articles 49, 50 and 51 to the extent that these provisions are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 216, 24.8.2018, p. 4.

1

---
# L_2019219EN.01002101.xml

| 22.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/21

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 207/2017

of 27 October 2017

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1370]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2015/996 of 19 May 2015 establishing common noise assessment methods according to Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2015/996 of 19 May 2015 establishing common noise assessment methods according to Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 32g (Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘32ga. | 32015 L 0996: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/996 of 19 May 2015 establishing common noise assessment methods according to Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 168, 1.7.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘32ga.

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/996 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 October 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 168, 1.7.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §721. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165

Section, acts June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §4, 36 Stat. 537; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; Aug. 16, 1937, ch. 665, §4, 50 Stat. 667, gave Commissioner of Lighthouses the power to settle damage claims up to $500.
Issue Date: 07/01/08 08-019 -1-

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 08-019 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IP 71004 05/09/06 IP 71004 07/01/08 

2. IMC 0801 10/19/06 IMC 0801 07/01/08 

3. ________ ________ IP 65001.15 07/01/08 

4. ________ ________ IP 73054 07/01/08 

5. ________ ________ IP 80522 07/01/08 

6. ________ ________ IP 84527 07/01/08 

TRAINING: None 

REMARKS: IP 71004 (Power Uprate) has been revised to address concerns identified 

during the OIG 2007 audit of the Power Uprate process by providing 

guidance on planning, tracking, and documenting completion of IP 71004. 

In addition, previously provided guidance was moved to Section 02, 

“Inspection Requirements and Guidance,” and referenced baseline 

procedures were changed to reflect the 2007 ROP realignment. 

 IMC 0801 (Reactor Oversight Process Feedback Program) has been 

revised to more efficiently use Technical Assignment Control (TAC) 

numbers for management of the feedback process. 

IP 65001.15 (Inspection of ITAAC-Related Installation of Fire Protection 

Equipment) is issued to support Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and 

Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC)-related new reactor construction inspections 

under 10 CFR Part 52. 

IP 73054 (Part 52, Preservice and Inservice Inspection - Review of 

Program) is issued to support inspections of operational programs 
Issue Date: 07/01/08 08-019 -2-

described in IMC 2504, “Construction Inspection Program - Non-ITAAC 

Inspections.” 

IP 80522 (Part 52, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 

(REMP) is issued to support inspections of operational programs 

described in IMC 2504, “Construction Inspection Program - Non-ITAAC 

Inspections.” 

IP 84527 (Part 52, Solid Waste Management System) is issued to support 

inspections of operational programs described in IMC 2504, “Construction 

Inspection Program - Non-ITAAC Inspections.” 

 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

END
# L_2019027EN.01000101.xml

| 31.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 27/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the cumulation of origin between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of Norway and the Republic of Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the cumulation of origin between the European Union, the Swiss Confederation, the Kingdom of Norway and the Republic of Turkey in the framework of the Generalised System of Preferences will enter into force on 1 February 2019 in accordance with point 18 of the Agreement.

---