alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 65515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25438]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 65515]]

                Proclamation 7845 of November 9, 2004

                
World Freedom Day, 2004

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                Fifteen years ago, the people of East and West Germany 
                tore down the Berlin Wall, and freedom triumphed over 
                Communism. The dismantling of the Berlin Wall reunited 
                Germany and helped spread freedom across Central and 
                Eastern Europe. With free elections and the spread of 
                democratic values, these countries won their liberty, 
                and their people became free. These democracies today 
                contribute to a strong Europe, and the United States 
                values their friendship and their partnership.

                On World Freedom Day, we recognize all of those who 
                fought for liberty and helped end the oppression of 
                Central and Eastern Europe. We stand by those who today 
                are enjoying the blessings of liberty. And we reaffirm 
                our commitment to extending peace and freedom in the 
                world.

                NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the 
                United States of America, by virtue of the authority 
                vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United 
                States, do hereby proclaim November 9, 2004, as World 
                Freedom Day. I call upon the people of the United 
                States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies 
                and activities and to reaffirm their dedication to 
                freedom and democracy.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                ninth day of November, in the year of our Lord two 
                thousand four, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

[FR Doc. 04-25438
Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# August 2008 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML082470564

Date Released: Friday, September 26, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML082470368 - Cover Letter:  August 2008 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 9/18/2008)
    - ML082470371 - Enclosures:  August 2008 Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.206. (11 page(s), 9/18/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### §§ 30.11-30.14 [Reserved]
### §1006. Right of transfer

Officers and employees in the postal career service of the Postal Service shall be eligible for promotion or transfer to any other position in the Postal Service or the executive branch of the Government of the United States for which they are qualified. The authority given by this section shall be used to provide a maximum degree of career promotion opportunities for officers and employees and to insure continued improvement of postal services.

(Pub. L. 91–375, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 732.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1971, pursuant to Resolution No. 71–9 of the Board of Governors. See section 15(a) of Pub. L. 91–375, set out as a note preceding section 101 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-05-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                           52010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 53549
<PP&E>                                           20282
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1054)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   75855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           117598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         33968
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     75855
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                201743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (201743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (201743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (201743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.006)


</TABLE>
#### James H. Winship, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 29, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 29, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0207. JOHNNIE BROWN v. BOBBY WILLS et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

15CV64
#### § 550.1101 Purpose.

This subpart provides the standards to be used by Federal agencies to prepare regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 5514 and by OPM to review and approve such agency regulations, and establishes procedural guidelines to recover debts from the current pay account of an employee when the employee's creditor and paying agencies are not the same.
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

M e m o r a n d u m

FORM G-l ISf (1-92)

. R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

August 20, 2001 

L-2001-12

TO Bob Bergeron

Assistant to the Labor M em ber

FRO M Steven A. B< 

G eneral Co

SUBJECT : Family G roup - Survivor Annuity C alculations

This is in response to your m em orandum d a te d July 26,2001, w herein you 

inquire a b o u t th e possibility of a young widow with tw o minor children 

waiving her annuity entitlem ent for selected periods of tim e. The 

p roposed w aiver would b e for th e purpose of excluding th e m other from 

the family group during those periods of time w hen her earnings w ould 

result in a d e c re a se in the am o u n t pay ab le to the family group.

The provisions governing th e waiver of an annuity a re found in section 11 

of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 j), w hich states as follows:

Any person a w a rd e d an annuity under this A ct m ay d e clin e 

to a c c e p t all or any part of such annuity by a w aiver signed 

a n d filed with the Board. Such a waiver m ay b e rev o k ed in 

writing a t any time, but no paym ent of the annuity w aiv ed 

shall b e m a d e covering th e period during w hich such w aiver 

w as in effect. Such a w aiver will have no effect on 

entitlem ent to. or the am o u n t of. anv other annuity or benefit. 

[Emphasis a d d e d ].

In a c c o rd a n c e with the specific terms of section 11 of th e Act, while a 

young w idow m ay w aive a c c e p ta n c e of her annuity for a se le c te d 

period of time, such waiver will h av e no effect on th e a m o u n t p a y a b le to 

any other family m em bers. Consequently, a young w id o w ’s w aiver of her 

annuity will not entitle her children to a recom putation of their annuity 

rates, excluding the young w idow from the family g roup.
I h a v e also considered w hether the young m other m ay e n te r a c y cle of 

can celin g her application, upon being subject to excess earnings, a n d 

then reap p ly by filing a new application w hen she is not su b ject to a 

reduction for her excess earnings. However, a review of th e Board's 

regulations indicates the cancellation of an application will not provide 

the desired result. When a person can cels an application th e e ffe ct is th e 

sa m e as though an application w as never filed. S ee 20 CFR 217.27. 

C onsequently, all annuity paym ents m a d e b a se d u p o n th e ap p licatio n 

being c a n c e lle d must b e repaid or recovered. S ee 20 CFR 217.26(b)(3).

In sum m ary, while th e young w idow m ay w aive a c c e p ta n c e of her 

annuity, section 11 of th e Act bars the recom putation of th e annuity rates 

of th e other family m em bers as a result of the waiver. C an cellatio n of th e 

young w idow 's application w ould allow for the reco m p u tatio n of th e 

annuity rates of th e other family m em bers, but Board regulations provide 

th at all annuity paym ents m a d e to the young w idow w ould h a v e to b e 

reco v ered or repaid.

c c: Bob Eggert, District M an ag er

C hicago, Illinois

^vl?uLell:c:cm w 

Dh 

• > /

H:\OPI NION^\Waiver of Annuity.doc
#### Frieda Weinberger, Appellant, v. William B. Weinberger, Respondent.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 847.805 What NAFI service can employees elect to credit toward retirement eligibility under CSRS or FERS? ( a ) Employees may elect to credit under this subpart any NAFI service that isn't already creditable under 5 U.S.C. 8332(b)(16), or under 5 CFR part 847, subpart D.
( b ) NAFI service used to qualify for an immediate annuity based on an election in paragraph (a) of this section cannot be credited in a NAFI retirement plan for any purpose including eligibility and calculations of NAFI benefits.
### §153712. Annual report

Not later than 6 months after the end of each fiscal year, the corporation shall submit a report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report may consist of a report on the proceedings of the national convention during that fiscal year. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1430.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153712 | 36:1016. | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §16, 76 Stat. 505. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 204 of House Document No. 103–7.
Board Coverage Decision

1996-24

Soo Line Railroad Co. d/b/a CP Rail System

Name Change - Effective January 1, 1992

Soo Line Railroad Company 

has changed its name to

Soo Line Railroad Co. d/b/a CP Rail System

No Decision Published

BA # 1606
#### In the Matter of Sol Endig, Appellant, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.
### [§432. Renumbered §492]
#### § 286.9 Maintaining recognized status.

Each program participant remaining in the program shall continuously meet all program requirements and cooperate with NIST in the conduct of all surveillance and reassessment activities. Participants shall reimburse NIST for expenses incurred for these purposes.
### §22505. Exclusive right to name

The corporation and its State, territorial, and local subdivisions have the exclusive right to use the name "American War Mothers".

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1305.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22505 | 36:100. | Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 303, §10, 43 Stat. 968. |

Section

The words "to have" are omitted as included in "to use". The words "in carrying out its business purposes" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### Clara Hammer v. George Hammer.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent in part and vote to deny leave to appeal in the following memorandum: The order of this court granting a temporary injunction to maintain the *status quo*before trial was not a final but an intermediate order, and was not based solely on an issue of law but in the discretion of this court on facts stated in the majority decision incorporated into the order of reversal which was not on the law alone but upon the facts and the law and therefore it is improper to certify the question which the majority of the court has certified (Civ. Prac. Act, § 589, subd. 3, pars, [a], [b]; *Braunworth*v. *Braunworth,*285 N. Y. 151; *Langan*V. *First Trust & Deposit Co.,*296 N. Y. 60). Settle order on notice. [See 278 App. Div. 396.]
§ 894.507 After I'm enrolled, may I change from one dental or vision plan or plan option to another? ( a ) You may change from one dental plan to another, and/or from one vision plan to another, or you may change from one plan option to another option in that same plan: ( 1 ) During the annual open season;
( 2 ) When you get married (except for *TEIs* who are unremarried survivors, *TEI former spouses,* and *TEI children);* or
( 3 ) For *employees* or employees of the United States Postal Service, when you return to Federal or Postal employment after being on leave without pay if you did not have Federal dental or vision coverage prior to going on leave without pay, or your coverage was terminated or canceled during your period of leave without pay.
( b ) ( 1 ) If you are enrolled in a dental or vision plan with a geographically restricted service area, and you or a covered eligible *family member* or *TEI family member* move out of the service area, you may change to a different dental or vision plan that serves that area.
( 2 ) You may make this change at any time before or after the move, once you or a covered eligible *family member* or *TEI family member* has a new address.
( 3 ) The enrollment change is effective the first day of the pay period following the pay period in which you make the change.
( 4 ) You may not change your *type of enrollment* unless you also have a *QLE* that allows you to change your *type of enrollment.*
[83 FR 58179, Nov. 19, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 47748, July 25, 2023]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4682** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. LA BARBRA JONES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of Virginia , at Richmond
. James R. Spencer , Chief District Judge. ( 3:10

- cr - 00085

- JRS

- 2 )

Submitted : January 26, 2012 Decided: February 15, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Mark Yurachek, THE LAW OFFICES OF MARK ALLEN YURACHEK & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, N. George Metcalf, Richard D. Cooke, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appelle e.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: La Barbra Jones appeals from her 33

- month sentence for three counts of filing false tax return s , in violation of 26
U.S.C. § 7206(1) ( 2006 ) (Counts 2, 3, 4) , and one count of assisting in filing false tax return s , in violation of 26 U.S.C.
§ 7206(2) ( 2006 ) (Count 64). On appeal, Jones alleges that the district court erred by denying her motion to withdraw the guilty plea she had entered before a magistrate judge. ∗ For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
We discern no abuse of discretion by the district court in its den ial of Jones’ motion to withdraw her guilty plea. See United States v. Ubakanma , 215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir. 2000) (providing review standard). After a th o rough hearing on the matter and consideration of the six factors set
out in United States v. Moore , 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir. 1991) , the district court found that Jones failed to establish a fair and just reason to support her request to withdraw as

r equired under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(h)
. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

∗ Jones waived her right to ple a d guilty before a district court judge and had her plea hearing conducted by a magistrate judge. (J.A. 5; R. 39).3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Silver Star Energy,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, David  Naylor,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    David Naylor
David Naylor
Treasurer, Director
(Principal Financial Officer)


May 6, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §20. Resignation or refusal of office

The only evidence of a refusal to accept, or of a resignation of the office of President or Vice President, shall be an instrument in writing, declaring the same, and subscribed by the person refusing to accept or resigning, as the case may be, and delivered into the office of the Secretary of State.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 678.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act

For protection and preservation of tape recordings of conversations involving former President Richard M. Nixon, see sections 101 to 106 of Pub. L. 93–526, set out as a note under section 2107 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
#### Bertha Martukis by Eugene Martukis, Appellee, v. Ferdinand P. Keyt, Appellant.

Gen. No. 5,854.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Winnebago county; the Hon. Arthur H. Frost, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Bertha Martukis by Eugene Martukis, as her next friend, against Ferdinand P. Keyt to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff, a girl sixteen years old, by being struck by a taxicab owned by the defendant while she was endeavoring to cross a street after alighting from a street car. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Charles W. Ferguson, for appellant.

David D. Madden, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

*280Abstract of the Decision.

1. Automobiles and gabages, § *3*
      ***
      *—when finding of jury as to contributory negligence controlling.*In an action for injuries sustained by plaintiff by being struck by a taxicab owned by defendant while plaintiff was attempting to cross a street, a verdict for plaintiff *held*controlling on the question whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, though it appeared from the record that the accident might have been caused by the combined negligence of the plaintiff and the driver of the car.

2. Instructions, § *94*
      ***
      *—when instruction to disregard testimony of witness inaccurately worded.*The giving of an instruction: “The court instructs the jury as a matter of law that if you believe from the evidence that any of the witnesses have wilfully testified falsely to any material fact in evidence then you will be entitled to entirely disregard any of the evidence of this witness in so far as his testimony is not corroborated by other competent evidence,” *held*reversible error, in that the instruction uses the word “competent” instead of the word “credible” or other words of like import.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND RELATED PROVISIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter IV was redesignated subchapter V of this chapter.
#### § 256.5 Duration of projects.

The work of a Research Associate is generally conducted on a full-time basis. Typically, Research Associates are in residence at NIST for 6 to 18 months; longer-term programs may be carried on by a succession of Research Associates. Agreements provide for cancellation by any of the parties.
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT - PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT ON AZERBAIJAN

----

4 AUG 98