alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1907

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to ensure the availability of 

funds to provide technical assistance for certain conservation programs 

of the Department of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma (for himself and Mr. HOLDEN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to ensure the 

availability of funds to provide technical assistance for 

certain conservation programs of the Department of Agriculture.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR TECHNICAL ASSIST4 ANCE FOR DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

5 CONSERVATION PROGRAMS. 

6 (a) Subsection (b) of section 1241 of the Food Secu7 rity Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3841), as amended by section 

8 2106 of the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropria-
2

•HR 1907 IH 

1 tions Act, 2003 (Public Law 108–11; 117 Stat. 590), is 

2 amended—

3 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Effective be4 ginning on the date of enactment of the Agricultural 

5 Assistance Act of 2003, subject to paragraph (2)’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘Effective as of February 20, 2003, 

7 subject to paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(3) FARMLAND PROTECTION PROGRAM, GRASS11 LAND RESERVE PROGRAM, AND ENVIRONMENTAL

12 QUALITY INCENTIVES PROGRAM.—Effective as of 

13 February 20, 2003, with respect to the conservation 

14 programs specified in paragraphs (4) through (6) of 

15 subsection (a), the funds reserved pursuant to para16 graph (1) for the provision of technical assistance 

17 shall be available only for the conservation program 

18 from which the funds were reserved and shall not be 

19 available for other conservation programs specified 

20 in subsection (a).’’.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1697

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 

the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer Continental Shelf in the 

Mid-Atlantic and North Atlantic planning areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2003

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the 

outer Continental Shelf in the Mid-Atlantic and North 

Atlantic planning areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Ocean and Safe 

5 Tourism Anti-Drilling Act’’ or the ‘‘COAST Anti-Drilling 

6 Act’’. 
2

•HR 1697 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CER2 TAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL 

3 SHELF. 

4 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

5 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(p) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

8 CERTAIN AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.—

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of this section or any 

10 other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 

11 lease for the exploration, development, or production of 

12 oil, natural gas, or any other mineral in—

13 ‘‘(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area; or 

14 ‘‘(2) the North Atlantic planning area.’’.

Æ
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS TO MEET 

JAN. 13-15 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.; POSTS 2011 SCHEDULE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) 

will hold a special public meeting on Jan. 13-15, in Rockville, Md., to discuss several issues of 

current interest. Some of the topics include: 

• Aircraft impact assessment for the revised AP1000 reactor design; 

• Final Safety Evaluation Report associated with the Vogtle reactor Units 3 and 4 

combined license application; 

• Draft final revision to regulatory guidance on approaches for probabilistic risk 

assessment in risk-informed decisions on nuclear plant-specific changes to the 

licensing basis; and 

• Draft final rule and regulatory guidance regarding enhancements to emergency 

preparedness regulations for nuclear power plants. 

The ACRS advises the Commission, independently from the NRC staff, on safety issues 

related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants as well as those and in the areas of 

health physics and radiation protection. 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B1 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, 

at 11545 Rockville Pike. Sessions on Thursday, Jan. 13, and Friday, Jan. 14, will run from 8:30 a.m. 

to 7:00 p.m., and the Saturday, Jan. 15, sessions will run from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Portions of the 

meeting may be closed to discuss proprietary information, as well as organizational and personnel 

matters. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s website at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2011/. 

This will be the first meeting of the new year. It will be headed by the following officials, all 

recently re-elected: Dr. Said Abdel-Khalik, chairman, Dr. J. Sam Armijo, vice-chairman and Dr. 

John W. Stetkar, member-at-large. A complete roster of members can be found here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/advisory/acrs/membership.html. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-222 December 22, 2010
The ACRS has also posted its 2011 schedule, which is available on the NRC’s website at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2011/. The meetings are scheduled for 

the following dates: Jan. 13-15, Feb. 10-12, Mar. 10-12, Apr. 7-9, May 12-14, Jun. 8-10, Jul. 13-15, 

Sep. 8-10, Oct. 6-8, Nov. 3-5 and Dec. 1-3. 

Anyone with questions or who wants to make oral statements during the meeting should 

notify Ilka Berrios at (301) 415-3179. For video conferencing services, contact Theron Brown at 

(301) 415-8066. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should contact 

the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Clinical Intelligence, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the  "Report"), I, Gerald Trumbule, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, based on my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 
1)       the Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.

*Date:    October 4, 2005                       /s/ Gerald Trumbule                        				              **                                                    *Gerald Trumbule			                                                                  Chief Financial Officer

----
# L_2022175EN.01004501.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 28/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1076]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1240 of 13 July 2021 on the compliance of the EU portal and the EU database for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use with the requirements referred to in Article 82(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1240 of 13 July 2021 on the compliance of the EU portal and the EU database for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use with the requirements referred to in Article 82(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 18a (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1569) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘18b. | 32021 D 1240: Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1240 of 13 July 2021 on the compliance of the EU portal and the EU database for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use with the requirements referred to in Article 82(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 275, 31.7.2021, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘18b.

32021 D 1240: Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1240 of 13 July 2021 on the compliance of the EU portal and the EU database for clinical trials of medicinal products for human use with the requirements referred to in Article 82(2) of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 275, 31.7.2021, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Decision (EU) 2021/1240 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 275, 31.7.2021, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2020026EN.01003901.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 56/2018

of 23 March 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/73]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2228 of 4 December 2017 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1), as corrected by OJ L 326, 9.12.2017, p. 55, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2228 of 4 December 2017 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1), as corrected by OJ L 326, 9.12.2017, p. 55, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 2228: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2228 of 4 December 2017 (OJ L 319, 5.12.2017, p. 2), as corrected by OJ L 326, 9.12.2017, p. 55.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 2228: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2228 of 4 December 2017 (OJ L 319, 5.12.2017, p. 2), as corrected by OJ L 326, 9.12.2017, p. 55.’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/2228, as corrected by OJ L 326, 9.12.2017, p. 55, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 March 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 319, 5.12.2017, p. 2.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6772

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANIEL SANCHEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:03-CR-184-RGD-FBS; 2:07-cv-131) Submitted: October 26, 2007 Decided: November 16, 2007 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Sanchez, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Daniel Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sanchez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant Sanchez’s motion to seal medical record exhibits and deny his motion to expand the certificate of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.332 Locality rate supplements. ( a ) For each band rate range, DHS may, after coordination with OPM, establish locality rate supplements that apply in specified locality pay areas. Locality rate supplements apply to employees whose official duty station is located in the given area. DHS may provide different locality rate supplements for different occupational clusters or for different bands within the same occupational cluster in the same locality pay area.
( b ) For the purpose of establishing and modifying locality pay areas, 5 U.S.C. 5304 is not waived. A DHS decision to use the locality pay area boundaries established under 5 U.S.C. 5304 does not require separate DHS regulations. DHS may, after coordination with OPM and in accordance with the public notice and comment provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, publish Departmental regulations (6 CFR Chapter I) in the Federal Register that establish and adjust different locality pay areas within the 48 contiguous States or establish and adjust new locality pay areas outside the 48 contiguous States. These regulations are subject to the continuing collaboration process described in § 9701.105. As provided by 5 U.S.C. 5304(f)(2)(B), judicial review of any DHS regulation regarding the establishment or adjustment of locality pay areas is limited to whether or not the regulation was promulgated in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553.
( c ) Locality rate supplements are considered basic pay for only the following purposes: ( 1 ) Retirement under 5 U.S.C. chapter 83 or 84;
( 2 ) Life insurance under 5 U.S.C. chapter 87;
( 3 ) Premium pay under 5 U.S.C. chapter 55, subchapter V, or similar payments under other legal authority;
( 4 ) Severance pay under 5 U.S.C. 5595;
( 5 ) Application of the maximum rate limitation set forth in § 9701.312;
( 6 ) Determining the rate of basic pay upon conversion to the DHS pay system established under this subpart, consistent with § 9701.373(b);
( 7 ) Other payments and adjustments authorized under this subpart as specified by DHS implementing directives;
( 8 ) Other payments and adjustments under other statutory or regulatory authority that are basic pay for the purpose of locality-based comparability payments under 5 U.S.C. 5304; and
( 9 ) Any provisions for which DHS locality rate supplements must be treated as basic pay by law.
ARTICLE ON AZERBAIJAN'S  ONSHORE OIL FIELDS :"LAND AHOY!"

----

**October 1997**
*Excerpt from The Caspian Investor newsletter,  published monthly with news and analysisfor oil and gas executives interested in the Caspian region. For more information or a samplecopy of The Caspian Investor newsletter, contact Jamie Cullen by telephone at 818-343-8474ext. 132, or via e-mail at [email protected].*
**LAND AHOY!**
A fundamental revision of Baku's investment policy for onshore fields is reaping quick results:Azerbaijan's first production-sharing agreement for an onshore field is scheduled to be signed inNovember and implementation is expected to begin early next year. The agreement marks asoftening of Azerbaijan's once-tough stance on projects to develop onshore deposits thatpermitted investors to participate only through joint ventures. Now Azeri officials appear willingto consider options for onshore projects ranging from full-fledged production-sharing agreementsto JVs with PSA-like features. After all, they have little choice: Their commitment to provide atleast partial financing for five or more offshore projects in the near future will leave them withlittle extra capital to spend onshore. Baku's new approach should render attractive an array ofprojects that in the past appeared unprofitable.
In late November, the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) plans to sign anagreement on the basic principles that would govern a production-sharing agreement with theCommonwealth Oil & Gas Co. Ltd. (Canada)/Union Texas Petroleum (US) alliance. Theagreement will specify development terms for the Southwestern Gobustan block, which is located300 kilometers southwest of Baku and contains in-place oil reserves totaling 100 million tons. TheUS-Canadian tandem was only one of several international companies seeking to develop onshorefields on PSA terms, according to a SOCAR official. Other companies that expressed interestinclude UNOCAL (US)/Delta (Saudi Arabia), Texaco, Frontera Energy Resources/Baker Hughes(all US), Elf Aquitaine (France), RAMCO, Lasmo (both UK), and Russia s LUKOIL. 
The November agreement will be significant not only to Commonwealth and Union Texas, but tothe entire foreign investment community, since it will demonstrate that Baku has significantlyrelaxed its policy toward onshore projects. Evidently persuaded that the allure of a production-sharing agreement would whet investor interest, SOCAR officials have also expressed, at leastprivately, a willingness to offer the UNOCAL/Delta group a production-sharing agreement for theKyursanga-Karabagly field.  In a joint venture, a foreign company can have a maximumownership stake of 49% and must pay eight separate taxes,  a SOCAR official involved indrafting PSAs said.  Under a production-sharing agreement, an investor could hold a greaterinterest than SOCAR does and would be subject only to the profit tax.  
**Loosening Up**
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONSI, Scott Kuhlman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kuhlman Company, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: August 15, 2005   /s/ Scott Kuhlman    By Scott Kuhlman    Principal Executive Officer