alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ikanos Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Michael Gulett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Cory J. Sindelar, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | IKANOS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                         |  | /s/    MICHAEL GULETT  
|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  | Michael Gulett                              
|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: November 5, 2009 |  |  |  | By:                         |  | /s/    CORY J. SINDELAR
|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  | Cory J. Sindelar                            
|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                        |  |  |  |                             |  |                         |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### §504. Cadets and midshipmen: chapter does not apply to

This chapter does not apply to cadets at the United States Military Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, the Coast Guard Academy, midshipmen at the United States Naval Academy, or cadets or midshipmen serving elsewhere in the armed forces.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 483.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 504 | 37:38 (as applicable to payment for leave). | Aug. 9, 1946, ch. 931, §10 (as applicable to payment for leave); added Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 475, §3 (as applicable to payment for leave), 61 Stat. 749; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §33(d)(2), 72 Stat. 1567. |

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Alice Sherman, Respondent, against General Electric Company, Appellant. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., taking no part.
### §170101. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Paralyzed Veterans of America (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1439.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170101(a) | 36:1151. | Aug. 11, 1971, Pub. L. 92–93, §§1, 2, 4 (related to perpetual succession), 85 Stat. 317. |
| | 36:1152. | |
| 170101(b) | 36:1154 (related to perpetual succession). | |

Section

Subsection (a) is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary language.

Subsection (b) is substituted for "shall have perpetual succession" for consistency in the revised title.
### §40306. Exclusive right to name, insignia, copyrights, emblems, badges, marks, and words

The corporation has the exclusive right to use the name "Civil Air Patrol" and all insignia, copyrights, emblems, badges, descriptive or designating marks, words, and phrases the corporation adopts. This section does not affect any vested rights.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1332.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40306 | 36:206. | July 1, 1946, ch. 527, §6, 60 Stat. 347. |

Section

The word "sole" is omitted as included in "exclusive". The words "right to use the name 'Civil Air Patrol' and all" are substituted for "right to the name 'Civil Air Patrol' and to have and to use, in carrying out its purposes, all" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "the corporation adopts" are substituted for "now or heretofore used by the Civil Air Patrol" in section 6 of the Act of July 1, 1946 (ch. 527, 60 Stat. 347) for consistency in the revised title. The words "in carrying out its program" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "This section does not affect any vested rights" are substituted for "Provided, however, That no powers or privileges herein granted shall interfere or conflict with established or vested rights" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
Argued and submitted June 2,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration December 6, 2000,

petition for review denied March 20, 2001 (331 Or 692)

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of John Harkness, Claimant. John HARKNESS, *Petitioner, v.*SAIF CORPORATION and Unocal 76, *Respondents.*

(97-08467; CA A104207)

15 P3d 103

Gayle A. Shields argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Jerome Patrick Larkin argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge,* and Kistler, Judge.

PER CURIAM

*

 Deits, C. J., *vice*Warren, S. J.

*330PER CURIAM

This is a workers’ compensation case in which claimant seeks review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of compensation. He contends that the Board erred in affirming SAIF’s denial of coverage because its denial was premature under our holding in *Croman Corp. v. Serrano,*163 Or App 136, 986 P2d 1253 (1999). Because the Board did not make a finding as to whether acceptance occurred before the denial in question, we remand for reconsideration. *Blamires v. Clean Pak Systems, Inc.,*171 Or App 263, 15 P3d 101 (2000).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
§ 451.104 Awards. ( a ) An agency may grant a cash, honorary, or informal recognition award, or grant time-off without charge to leave or loss of pay consistent with chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, and this part to an employee, as an individual or member of a group, on the basis of— ( 1 ) A suggestion, invention, superior accomplishment, productivity gain, or other personal effort that contributes to the efficiency, economy, or other improvement of Government operations or achieves a significant reduction in paperwork;
( 2 ) A special act or service in the public interest in connection with or related to official employment; or
( 3 ) Performance as reflected in the employee's most recent rating of record (as defined in § 430.203 of this chapter), provided that the rating of record is at the fully successful level (or equivalent) or above, except that performance awards may be paid to SES members only under § 534.405 of this chapter and not on the basis of this subpart.
( b ) A cash award under this subpart is a lump sum payment and is not basic pay for any purpose.
( c ) An award is subject to applicable tax rules, such as withholding.
( d ) When an award is approved for— ( 1 ) An employee of another agency, the benefiting agency shall make arrangements to transfer funds to the employing agency to cover the award. If the administrative costs of transferring funds would exceed the amount of the award, the employing agency shall absorb the award costs and pay the award; and
( 2 ) A member of the armed forces for a suggestion, invention, or scientific achievement, arrangements shall be made to transfer funds to the agency having jurisdiction over the member in accordance with E.O. 11438, “Prescribing Procedures Governing Interdepartmental Cash Awards to the Members of the Armed Forces”.
( e ) An award may be granted to a separated employee or the legal heir(s) or estate of a deceased employee.
( f ) A time-off award granted under this subpart shall not be converted to a cash payment under any circumstances.
( g ) When granting an award paid as a percentage of basic pay under 5 U.S.C. 4505a(a)(2), the rate of basic pay used must include any applicable locality payment under 5 CFR part 531, subpart F; special rate supplement under 5 CFR part 530, subpart C; or similar payment or supplement under other legal authority. For an employee receiving a retained rate under 5 CFR part 536, subpart C (or similar authority, such as 5 CFR 359.705), the rate of basic pay is the maximum payable rate for the employee's grade or level, rather than the retained rate.
( h ) Programs for granting performance-based cash awards on the basis of a rating of record at the fully successful level (or equivalent) or above, as designed and applied, must make meaningful distinctions based on levels of performance.
[60 FR 43946, Aug. 23, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 70359, Dec. 6, 2004; 70 FR 31287, May 31, 2005; 70 FR 74995, Dec. 19, 2005; 72 FR 1270, Jan. 11, 2007]
§ 849.601 When a new representative payee will be selected. ( a ) When the agency learns that the interests of the annuitant are not served by continuing payment to the present representative payee or that the present representative payee is no longer able or willing to carry out the payee responsibilities, the agency will undertake to find a new representative payee.
( b ) The agency will select a new representative payee if the agency finds a preferred payee or if the present payee: ( 1 ) Has been found by the agency or a court of competent jurisdiction to have misused the benefits;
( 2 ) Has not used the benefit payments on the annuitant's behalf in accordance with the rules in this part;
( 3 ) Has not carried out the other responsibilities described in this subpart;
( 4 ) Dies;
( 5 ) No longer wishes to be the representative payee;
( 6 ) Is unable to manage the benefit payments; or
( 7 ) Fails to cooperate, within a reasonable time, in providing evidence, accounting, or other information requested by the agency.
( c ) The agency may suspend payment as explained in § 849.202(c) if we determine that making direct payment to the annuitant would cause substantial harm. Payments, including all retroactive amounts due, will resume once a representative payee is located.
II 

Calendar No. 337

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2075

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West 

Palm Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers 

Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm 

6 Beach, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2075 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 337

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2075

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, as the 

‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | - | the                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended                March                31, 2005, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | - | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/                Thomas K. Grove             |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas                K. Grove                       |   |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|  /s/                Joanne Forsberg             |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Joanne                Forsberg                       |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |   |
### §50105. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1342.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50105(a) | 36:3706. | Dec. 9, 1985, Pub. L. 99–172, §§6, 7, 99 Stat. 1021. |
| 50105(b) | 36:3707. | |

Section

The words "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States in which it is incorporated" are omitted as unnecessary.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7632** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. REGGIE LAMAR KELLEY, a/k/a Lil Red , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , Senior District Judge. ( 3:04

- cr - 00998

- CMC

- 1; 3:13

- cv - 02494

- CMC )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Reggie Lamar Kelley, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Reggie Lamar Kelley seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 201 2 ) motion as successive and unauthorized, and he has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability . The district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) ( 2012 )
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional righ t.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) ( 2012 )
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debat able, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kelley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifi cate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §100108. Duty to maintain tax-exempt status

The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1366.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 100108 | 36:1714 (1st sentence). | Nov. 20, 1981, Pub. L. 97–82, §15 (1st sentence), 95 Stat. 1093. |

Section
### §10463. Reports

Each grantee receiving funds under this subchapter shall submit a report to the Attorney General evaluating the effectiveness of projects developed with funds provided under this subchapter and containing such additional information as the Attorney General may prescribe.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2104, formerly §2103, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40231(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1933; renumbered §2104, Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title XV, §1506(1), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796hh–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2104 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2105 and is classified to section 10464 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–103 not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
# L_2019036EN.01005901.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/59

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 98/2017

of 5 May 2017

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2019/210]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2214 of 8 December 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2214 of 8 December 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 2214: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2214 of 8 December 2016 (OJ L 334, 9.12.2016, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 2214: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2214 of 8 December 2016 (OJ L 334, 9.12.2016, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2214 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 May 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 334, 9.12.2016, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 839.1115 What is an actuarial reduction?

An actuarial reduction allows you to receive benefits without having to pay an amount due in a lump sum. OPM reduces your annuity in a way that, on average, allows the Fund to recover the amount of the missing lump sum over your lifetime. The actuarial reduction becomes a permanent reduction in your benefit. The amount of the reduction depends on your age and the amount of the lump sum you would otherwise have to pay at that time. To compute an actuarial reduction, OPM divides the lump sum amount by the present value factor for your age at retirement.
# L_2019241EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade

The Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam on forest law enforcement, governance and trade (1), signed in Brussels on 19 October 2018, has pursuant to its Article 25(1), entered into force on 1 June 2019.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 5.6.2019, p. 3

1

---