alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t FORM 0-1111 (1-M)

M e m o r a n d u m

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t b o a r d

L -95-13

(PR 1 C 1995,

TO: John A. Bognar

Deputy Director of Unemployment and Sickness

Insurance

FROM : Steven A. B a r t h o l o w ^ c ^

Deputy General Counsel

Through: Catherine Cook

General Counsel

SUBJECT: Eligibility Of Claimants for UI benefits Residing

in Foreign Countries

This is in response to your memorandum of December 27, 1994,

inquiring whether employees residing outside the United States

remain eligible for RUIA benefits. You state that your request

results from two cases. In the first case, an employee has resigned

from his railroad employer to accompany a spouse whose employment

was transferred overseas. The second case involves a claimant who

has moved to Mexico while retaining a post office box in the United

States.

The Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act and the regulations do not

prohibit the payment of unemployment benefits simply because the

beneficiary does not reside in the United States. Part 325 of the

Board regulations describes the procedure for applying for

unemployment benefits. Part 327 of the Board's regulations require

unemployed individuals to be "available for work" as a condition of

eligibility for such benefits. Neither of these regulations

require the employee to apply for benefits or provide evidence of

his or her continued eligibility for benefits "in person."

Consequently, a foreign residence in and of itself would not bar to

payment of such benefits, assuming the employee meets all other

eligibility conditions.

Eligibility issues that would be presented by the cases at issue

here include the question of whether or not there was good cause to

voluntarily quit employment and whether the claimants are available

for work.

In comparing state unemployment laws, we note that most states do

not bar eligibility for benefits on grounds of a foreign residency;

however, the states are split as to whether a claimant's voluntary

resignation due to change of location of residence constitutes good

cause within the meaning of the various state statutes. Even if

you were to find good cause, the claimant still must prove he or

she is "available for work." It may difficult for your bureau to
s - 2 -

verify availability for work when the claimant resides in a foreign

country. In this regard it is the claimant's responsibility to

establish that he or she is available for work. The inability to

verify such availability may constitute grounds for denial. In

addition, a claimant certainly would not be available for work if

he or she relocated to a country where a work permit is required

and he or she was unable to obtain one.

Finally, you suggest, a foreign resident may not be able to meet

the time limits established in Part 325 for filing a claim by mail.

You should follow your normal procedures with respect to

timeliness.

TWSadler:KDJohnson:kdj:cmw:scm:atr

ELIGIBLE.KDP
NRC LICENSING BOARD TO WEBCAST PORTION OF 

HEARING ON DAVIS-BESSE ENFORCEMENT CASE 

 The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB), an independent judicial arm of the 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will provide a live video stream of the first day of its hearing 

concerning the NRC’s Enforcement Order against former Davis-Besse employee David Geisen. 

The live video stream is part of an ASLB pilot program examining how information technology 

can enhance the public’s ability to observe the Board’s activities. 

 The video stream, which will be archived for 90 days, will be available at this Web site: 

http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=53643. The video, scheduled to start Dec. 8 

shortly before 9:30 a.m. Eastern Standard Time, will be available in Windows Media and 

QuickTime formats. 

The hearing will begin Dec. 8 at 9:30 a.m. and could last the entire week; the 

commencement of the hearing on subsequent days will be determined during the course of the 

hearing. The public may observe the proceeding in person, except for any closed sessions, in the 

ALSB Hearing Facility, Room T-3B45 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at 

11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. 

The ASLB will hear testimony regarding Geisen’s challenge of the agency’s 

Enforcement Order, which bars Geisen from NRC-licensed activities for five years. The NRC 

issued the Order in January 2006, after the agency found Geisen played a role in deliberately 

providing incomplete and inaccurate information to the NRC on conditions at the Davis-Besse 

nuclear power plant in 2001. Geisen requested the hearing, which was held in abeyance until the 

U.S. Department of Justice concluded a parallel criminal case against Geisen earlier this year. 

The ASLB strongly advises those attending the hearing to arrive early to allow time for 

security screening. The Board also requests attendees avoid bringing unnecessary hand-carried 

items, such as packages, briefcases, backpacks, or other items that might need individual 

examination. Attempting to disrupt the hearing will not be tolerated. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-214 November 21, 2008
**FREEDOM
BANCSHARES, INC.**
 **AND
SUBSIDIARY**
   **EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 In
connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freedom
Bancshares, Inc. (the “ Company ”) for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “ Periodic
Report ”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States
Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 May 13,
2005




/s/
      Clyde A. McArthurClyde A. McArthurChief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and
furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
 
 The
information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# L_2020068EN.01003401.xml

| 5.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 296/2019

of 13 December 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/314]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/957 of 11 June 2019 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards (3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctyl) silanetriol and TDFAs (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/957 of 11 June 2019 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards (3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctyl) silanetriol and TDFAs (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 0957: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/957 of 11 June 2019 (OJ L 154, 12.6.2019, p. 37).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 0957: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/957 of 11 June 2019 (OJ L 154, 12.6.2019, p. 37).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/957 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 154, 12.6.2019, p. 37.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 841.306 Reconsideration. ( a ) *Who may file.* Except as noted in paragraph (b) of this section, any individual whose rights or interests under FERS are affected by an OPM decision (under § 841.305) stating the right to request reconsideration may request OPM to review its initial decision.
( b ) *Actions covered elsewhere.* ( 1 ) A request for reconsideration of termination of annuity payments under 5 U.S.C. 8311 through 22 will be made in accordance with the procedures set out in subpart K of part 831 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A request for reconsideration of a decision to collect a debt will be made in accordance with § 845.204(b).
( 3 ) A decision on court orders affecting FERS benefits will be made in accordance with subpart I of this part.
( c ) *Reconsideration.* A request for reconsideration, when applicable, must be in writing, must include the applicant's name, address, date of birth and claim number, if applicable, and must state the basis for the request.
( d ) *Time limits on reconsideration.* ( 1 ) A request for reconsideration must be received by OPM within 30 calendar days from the date of the initial decision.
( 2 ) The Associate Director's representative responsible for reconsiderations may extend the time limit for filing when the requestor shows that he or she was not notified of the time limit and was not otherwise aware of it, or that he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from making the request within the time limit.
( e ) *Final decision.* After any applicable reconsideration, the Associate Director's representative will issue a final decision that must be in writing, must fully set forth the findings and conclusions of the reconsideration, and must contain notice of the right to request an appeal provided in § 841.308. Copies of the final decision must be sent to the individual, to any competing claimants and, where applicable, to the agency.
### **CHAPTER 77—VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ORGANIZATION; GENERAL

Sec.
7701.
Organization of the Administration.
7703.
Functions of the Administration.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—QUALITY ASSURANCE

7731.
Establishment.
7732.
Functions.
7732A.
Employee certification.
7733.
Personnel.
7734.
Annual report to Congress.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–389, title II, §225(a)(2), Oct. 10, 2008, 122 Stat. 4158, added item 7732A.

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–233, title IV, §402(d)(2), June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 411, substituted "QUALITY ASSURANCE" for "VETERANS OUTREACH SERVICES PROGRAM" in item for subchapter II and struck out former items 7721 "Purpose; definitions", 7722 "Outreach services", 7723 "Veterans assistance offices", 7724 "Outstationing of counseling and outreach personnel", 7725 "Use of other agencies", 7726 "Annual report to Congress", 7727 "Outreach for eligible dependents", and subchapter III "QUALITY ASSURANCE".

**2001**—Pub. L. 107–14, §6(b)(2), June 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 31, added item 7727.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–117, title VIII, §801(a)(2), Nov. 30, 1999, 113 Stat. 1586, added heading for subchapter III and items 7731 to 7734.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents SECY-10-0113 - Closure Options for Generic Safety Issue-191, Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized Water Reactors Sump Performance Accession Number: ML101820212 Date Released: Wednesday, September 1, 2010 Package Contents The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools. ML101820296 - SECY-10-0113 - Closure Options for Generic Safety Issue-191, Assesment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized Water Reactor Sump Performance (12 page(s), 8/26/2010)
            ML101820328 - SECY-10-0113 - Enclosure 1 - Background Discussion and Technical Issues (10 page(s), 8/26/2010)
            ML101820349 - SECY-10-0113 - Enclosure 2 - Evaluation of GSI-191 Closure Options (14 page(s), 8/26/2010)
            ML101820353 - SECY-10-0113 - Enclosure 3 - Discussion of Leak-Before-Break (14 page(s), 8/26/2010)
            ML101820361 - SECY-10-0113 - Enclosure 4 - Discussion of Proposed 10 CFR 50.46a (6 page(s), 8/26/2010)
            ML101820367 - SECY-10-0113 - Enclosure 5 -  Risk-Informed Versus Deterministic Treatment (2 page(s), 8/26/2010)
            ML101820369 - SECY-10-0113 - Enclosure 6 -  Radiation Protection and Dose Evaluation (6 page(s), 8/26/2010)


Privacy Policy Site Disclaimer
#### John Cannon, Respondent, *v.*James C. Fargo, as President of the American Express Company, Appellant.

*Hegligence —injury to workman*— *volunteer—practice—dismissal on appeal.*

Upon reargument ordered after decision of November last to reverse and dismiss the complaint, in view of - subsequent decisions of the Court of Appeals, on the power of this court-to direct final judgment of dismissal. (See 165 App. Div. 931.)

Per Curiam:

Plaintiff’s first and direct admission that at the time of the accident, and at the first trial, he did not know it was his duty to help with express packages, must control. He then swore that such help was not his duty, nor his custom, since (except in rare instances when called on by the station master) he had not given such help to defendant’s servants in handling express matter. His own testimony must be accepted as true, and, therefore, must be decisive of bis action. A mere volunteer, *922when he went to this express car, as plaintiff conceded that he was, could not afterwards face about and turn himself into an emergency helper by such outside testimony as plaintiff produced at the later trials. As the complaint should have been dismissed below, this court, on reversal, may render a final judgment of dismissal. *(Peterson*v. *Ocean Electric R. Co.,*214 N. Y. 43; *Bullock*v. *New York Central & Hudson River R. R. Co.,*213 id. 694.) The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment and order reversed on reargument and complaint dismissed, with costs.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PURPOSE—DEFINITIONS
# L_2020007EN.01000301.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 7/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 7/3

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Macao Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China on certain aspects of air services, signed in Macao on 23 November 2013, entered into force on 30 September 2016, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 29 September 2016.

---
# L_2016161EN.01000102.xml

| 18.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part

The Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 27 June 2014 in Brussels (1), enters into force on 1 July 2016, in accordance with Article 431(2) of the Agreement, as the last instrument of ratification or approval was deposited on 23 May 2016.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 261, 30.8.2014, p. 4.

1

---
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Respondent-Appellee, *v.*Morris Hicks, Petitioner-Appellant.

(No. 59823;

First District (1st Division)

July 1, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

PER CURIAM.

EGAN, P. J., took no part.
### §1504. Persons heretofore having a pensionable status

The pension benefits of subchapters II and III of this chapter shall, notwithstanding the service requirements of such subchapters, be granted to persons heretofore recognized by law as having a pensionable status.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1134, §504; renumbered §1504, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior section 1504 was renumbered section 3104 of this title.

Another prior section 1504, Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1172; Pub. L. 89–137, §1(a), Aug. 26, 1965, 79 Stat. 576; Pub. L. 90–431, July 26, 1968, 82 Stat. 447; Pub. L. 91–219, title I, §101, Mar. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 76; Pub. L. 92–540, title I, §101(2), Oct. 24, 1972, 86 Stat. 1074; Pub. L. 93–508, title I, §101(3), Dec. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1579; Pub. L. 93–602, title II, §202, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1958; Pub. L. 94–502, title I, §§101, 104(4), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2383, 2384; Pub. L. 95–202, title I, §101, Nov. 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 1433, related to subsistence allowances to be paid veterans while pursuing a course of vocational rehabilitation training under chapter 31 of this title, prior to repeal, effective Oct. 1, 1980, by Pub. L. 96–466, title VIII, §802(a)(4), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2218. See section 3108 of this title.

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 504 of this title as this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2265 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2265

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the treatment 
             of certain expenses of rural letter carriers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2003

    Mr. Shaw (for himself, Mr. Tanner, Mr. Sandlin, Mr. Foley, Mr. 
LoBiondo, Mr. English, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Lewis of 
Georgia, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Kleczka, Mr. Stark, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
   Matsui, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Collins, Mr. Deutsch, and Mr. Ramstad) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the treatment 
             of certain expenses of rural letter carriers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN EXPENSES OF RURAL LETTER CARRIERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 162(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to treatment of certain reimbursed expenses of rural 
mail carriers) is amended by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph 
(3) and by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Special rule where expenses exceed reimbursements.--
        Notwithstanding paragraph (1)(A), if the expenses incurred by 
        an employee for the use of a vehicle in performing services 
        described in paragraph (1) exceed the qualified reimbursements 
        for such expenses, such excess shall be taken into account in 
        computing the miscellaneous itemized deductions of the employee 
        under section 67.''
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading for section 162(o) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``Reimbursed''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2245

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to limit the nonFederal share of the cost of shore protection projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2003

Mr. LOBIONDO (for himself and Mr. LAMPSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

to limit the non-Federal share of the cost of shore protection projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Beaches 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS. 

7 Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act 

8 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 

10 ‘‘(n) SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.—
2

•HR 2245 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) PROHIBITION ON SOLICITATION OF EX2 CESS CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Secretary shall not so3 licit contributions from non-Federal interests for 

4 costs of constructing projects or measures for shore 

5 protection in excess of the non-Federal share as6 signed to the appropriate project purposes listed in 

7 subsections (a), (b), and (c). 

8 ‘‘(2) FULL PAYMENT OF CERTAIN COSTS BY

9 NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

10 limit the authority of the Secretary to require non11 Federal interests to pay the full cost of work per12 formed outside the authorized scope of a project.’’.

Æ
### §21108. Duty to maintain corporate and tax-exempt status

(a) Corporate Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as a corporation incorporated under the laws of each State in which it is incorporated.

(b) Tax-Exempt Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21108(a) | 36:2408(e). | June 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–314, §§8(e), 15 (1st sentence), 98 Stat. 238, 239. |
| 21108(b) | 36:2414 (1st sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "organized and" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "each State" are substituted for "State or States" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.