alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:39 AM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov; silverman.steven@epamail.epa.gov; 

Johnson.Steffan@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Your comment on use of Method 5 vs. Method 5I

Dear Courtney:

In our conversation you expressed a concern about the use of Method 5 vs. Method 5I. My understanding 

was you wanted to be sure that, even though the rule encourages the use of 5I, Method 5 is still 

acceptable. I have attached a couple of excerpts from the rule. What we say is you may use Method 5 or 

Method 5I. So I believe that the rule test plainly shows that either method is acceptable. Let me know if 

you have any more concerns on this issue.

(See attached file: PM Test Methods.docx)

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

919-541-5605

"Higgins, Cortney" ---12/14/2012 06:53:49 PM---Hi Sharon, Attached are interagency comments under 

EO 13563 on the Portland cement rule. Please let

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 12/14/2012 06:53 PM

Subject: Interagency comments on RIN 2060-AQ93

Hi Sharon,

Attached are interagency comments under EO 13563 on the Portland cement rule. Please let me know if you have 

any questions or comments. 

There may be additional comments that I’ll receive on Monday, but I wanted to get these to you before the 

weekend. 

Thanks,

Cortney

202.395.7856[attachment "EO_12866_PortlandCement_2060-AQ93_InteragencyCommentsunderEO13563.docx" 

deleted by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US] 
(c) PM Emissions Monitoring Requirements. (1) For each 

kiln or clinker cooler subject to a PM emissions limit in 

§60.62, you must demonstrate compliance through an initial 

performance test. You will conduct your performance test using 

Method 5 or Method 5I at appendix A-3 to part 60 of this 

chapter. You must also monitor continuous performance through 

use of a PM continuous parametric monitoring system (PM CPMS).

(7) Use EPA Method 5 or Method 5I of appendix A to part 60 

of this chapter to determine PM emissions. For each performance 

test, conduct at least three separate runs under the conditions 

that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest 

load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. Conduct 

each test run to collect a minimum sample volume of 2 dscm for 

determining compliance with a new source limit and 1 dscm for 

determining compliance with an existing source limit. Calculate 

the average of the results from three consecutive runs to 

determine compliance. You need not determine the particulate 

matter collected in the impingers (”back half”) of the Method 5 

or Method 5I particulate sampling train to demonstrate 

compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. This shall not 

preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination 

of the ”back half” for other purposes.
### §22501. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—American War Mothers (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Place of Incorporation.—The corporation is declared to be incorporated in the District of Columbia.

(c) Period of Existence.—The corporation may continue to exist until there are no individuals who qualify for membership.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1304.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22501 | 36:91. | Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 303, §§1, 2, 5 (words between colon and 1st comma), 13, 15, 43 Stat. 966, 967, 968. |
| | 36:92.36:95 (words between colon and 1st comma).36:103.36:105. | |

Section

36:95 (words between colon and 1st comma).

36:103.

36:105.

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary and executed words.

The text of 36:92, 103, and 105 is omitted as executed and obsolete.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN DONAHUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 183 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Arthur Silverman, Respondent, v. Indevco, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 4.15

                                                 BANK of BERMUDA
                                                 Bank of Bermuda
                                                 (Isle of Man) Limited
                                                 P.O. Box 34
                                                 12/13/ Hill Street,
                                                 Douglas,
                                                 Isle of Man, IM99 1BW
                                                 British Isles
                                                 Telephone (44) 1624 637777
                                                 Fax (44) 1624 63777879


9th March, 2001



The Directors,
Trade Media Holdings Limited,
Isle of Man Representative Office,
Salisbury House,
Douglas,
Isle of Man.


Dear Sirs:

This letter confirms that the Bank of Bermuda (Isle of Man) Limited ("the Bank")
is prepared to extend the existing loan facility of U.S. $25,000,000 (twenty
five million U.S. Dollars) extended to Trade Media Holdings Limited ("the
Borrower") subject to the terms and conditions originally set forth in the
Bank's facility letter of 13th March 2000.

The loan and all unpaid interest, fees and other sums payable under this
facility shall be repaid in full not later than the 12th March 2002, pending a
full review and possible renewal of the facility for a further twelve month
term.

The Bank will incur no obligations under this letter until it has received all
of the following:

     a) return of the enclosed copy of this letter duly signed by the Borrower
as acceptance of the terms and conditions of this letter.

     b) a copy (certified as true by a Director or the Secretary of the
Borrower) of a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Borrower authorising
such acceptance and designating the person(s) authorised to sign the acceptance
and confirming that all corporate action necessary to accept the terms of this
letter have been taken.


<PAGE>

                                      -2-


     c) payment of an Annual Fee of(pound)1,000 in respect of this extension.

If the terms and conditions of this letter are acceptable, please sign and date
the form of acceptance on the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to the
Bank together with the items mentioned above.

                                    Yours faithfully,



                                    /s/  Alan Corkill
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Alan Corkill
                                    Credit Manager
#### Mary A. Mineo, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Joseph Mineo, Respondent, v. City of Syracuse, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff .in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
#### FORT MASON FRUIT CO. v. DURKIN, Secretary of Labor.

No. 14725.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 2, 1954.

Claude L. Gray, Orlando, Fla., James Hardin Peterson, Lakeland, Fla., Dorothea Watson, Orlando, Fla., for appellant.

Bessie Margolin, Chief of Appellate Lit. U. S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Solicitor, Joseph M. Stone, Attorney, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D. C., Beverley R. Worrell, Regional Attorney, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.

Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.

*364DAWKINS, District Judge.

This is a companion case to Chapman v. Durkin, 5 Cir., 214 F.2d 360; and the issues are identical, with common counsel. Appellant was also engaged in “bird dog” operations of the citrus fruit industry in the State of Florida. It owned no farms or groves and its employees worked indiscriminately in gathering rejected fruit from the trees and in transporting it to bins or canneries, with approximately the same quantity of purchases as eliminations from packers and small producers at its yard.

The only difference appears to be that appellant contends it has a stronger case on the facts because of a stipulation in the record, to wit:

> “16. All of defendant’s employees are necessary to the maintenance and operation of its business and all operate as an integral part thereof.”

Judge Simpson below held, as did Judge Barker in the Chapman case, and for the same reasons, that while appellant was not a farmer, employees who gathered the fruit were essentially workers in agriculture “on a farm” within the meaning of the Act, Section 203(f), 29 U.S.C.A. § 203(f).

It is not believed that the stipulation justifies any different conclusion from that reached in the Chapman case. There, the business was a unit, and, as here, was one of buying fruit which, it gathered from the trees, as well as fruit rejected by packers and fruit brought to its yard by small producers. Since appellant was not a “farmer” within the meaning of the law, all of the labor, other than gathering the unpicked fruit, was performed elsewhere than “on a farm”; and regardless of the manner in which the appellant operated, under the authorities cited in the Chapman case, the fact that all employees operated as a unit could not serve to exempt even the same individual employees when engaged in other operations of appellant away from the farm.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.
### §21112. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be submitted at the same time as the report of the audit required by section 10101 of this title. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21112 | 36:2411. | June 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–314, §12, 98 Stat. 239. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 196 of House Document No. 103–7.
EXHIBIT 10.32



SALARY INFORMATION FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS



The table below provides information regarding the salary of each executive officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated (Kosan) as of March 15, 2005. All other
compensation arrangements between Kosan and each of its executive officers are referenced in the Exhibit Index to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                                    |  |        |        
|----------------------------------- |  | ------ | -------
|Executive Officer                   |  | Salary
|Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D.        |  | $      | 425,000
|Robert G. Johnson, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. |  | $      | 350,000
|Susan M. Kanaya                     |  | $      | 292,000
|Bruce E. MacMillan                  |  | $      | 252,000
NRC APPROVES RULE INCORPORATING EPA STANDARDS 

FOR YUCCA MOUNTAIN REPOSITORY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a final rule incorporating the 

Environmental Protection Agency=s radiation protection standards for the proposed high-level waste 

repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev., for the period beyond 10,000 years and up to 1 million years. 

The rule, to be published soon in the Federal Register, makes NRC=s regulations for the 

repository in 10 CFR Part 63 consistent with the EPA=s revised standards, as required by law. The 

EPA=s final standard was issued Sept. 30, 2008. The EPA=s revised standards and the NRC=s 

rulemaking were required by the July 9, 2004, ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. 

Circuit, which overturned EPA=s earlier standard that limited the compliance period to 10,000 years. 

EPA published its proposed revisions Aug. 22, 2005, and NRC published a proposed rule 

adopting EPA’s revisions and requesting public comment on Sept. 8, 2005. The Federal Register

notice with NRC’s final rule includes the NRC staff=s responses to public comments on the 

proposed rule, as well as a regulatory analysis of the final rule. 

The final rule retains EPA=s standard dose limit for individuals of 15 millirem for the first 

10,000 years after disposal and adopts EPA’s 100 millirem dose limit for the period after 10,000 

years and up to 1 million years. It will be posted on the NRC Web site here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fedreg/notices/. The rule will become effective 30 

days following publication. 

 The Department of Energy submitted its application for the Yucca Mountain repository on 

June 3, 2008. The NRC formally docketed the application Sept. 8, and published a notice of 

opportunity to request a hearing on Oct. 22. Petitions to intervene were submitted in December, and 

in January, three Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards were established to review the proposed 

contentions for standing and admissibility. Information about the NRC’s review of the Yucca 

Mountain application is available here: http://www.nrc.gov/waste/hlw-disposal/yucca-lic-app.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-031 February 17, 2009
# L_2017300EN.01004101.xml

| 16.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 91/2016

of 29 April 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement [2017/2041]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1188 of 28 April 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for local space heaters (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1188 of 28 April 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for local space heaters (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 6o (Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1095) of Chapter IV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘6p. | 32015 R 1188: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1188 of 28 April 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for local space heaters (OJ L 193, 21.7.2015, p. 76).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6p.

Article 2

The following point is inserted after point 26p (Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1095) of Annex IV to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘26q. | 32015 R 1188: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1188 of 28 April 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for local space heaters (OJ L 193, 21.7.2015, p. 76).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘26q.

Article 3

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/1188 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 193, 21.7.2015, p. 76.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
| Global Sources Ltd22nd FloorVita Tower29 Wong Chuk Hang RoadAberdeenHong Kong | Freddie LingE: fling@savills.com.hkDL: (852) 2842 4297F: (852) 2530 0756 23/F Two Exchange SquareCentral, Hong Kong EA LICENCE: C-023750T: (852) 2801 6100savills.com |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | RE: | 1) | UNITS 21-28 ON 26TH FLOOR OF PACIFIC LINK TOWER, UNITS 12-20 ON 26TH FLOOR OF TOWER B AND CAR PARKING SPACES NOS. P109, P110 AND P126 ON 1STFLOOR, SOUTHMARK, 11 YIP HING STREET, WONG CHUK HANG, HONG KONG |
|--------|-----|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | 2)    21ST, 22ND AND 23RD FLOORS, VITA TOWER, 29 WONG CHUK HANG ROAD, WONG CHUK HANG, HONG KONG |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | 3)    THE WHOLE OF 33RD, 34TH, 35TH AND 36TH FLOORS OF INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TOWER, INTERSECTION OF FUHUA THIRD ROAD AND YITIAN       ROAD, FUTIAN DISTRICT, SHENZHEN, THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | 4)    THE WHOLE OF 48TH, 49TH AND 50TH FLOORS OF INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TOWER, INTERSECTION OF FUHUA THIRD ROAD AND YITIAN ROAD,       FUTIAN DISTRICT, SHENZHEN, THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | 5)    THE WHOLE OF 25TH TO 28TH FLOORS (ACTUAL FLOOR: 21ST TO 24TH FLOORS) AND CAR PARKING SPACES NOS. B2-9, B2-10, B2-11, B2-12 AND B2-15, CITY POINT, NO.       666 WEST HUAIHAI ROAD, SHANGHAI, THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# L_2018201EN.01000101.xml

| 8.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 201/1

---

Information on the date of signature of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Côte d'Ivoire

The Protocol (1) on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire was signed on 1 August 2018.

1

The Protocol applies provisionally from 1 August 2018, date of signature, in accordance with its Article 13.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 194, 31.7.2018, p. 3.

1

---
§ 847.912 If an employee who elects to credit NAFI service under subpart H of this part elects a survivor annuity will the monthly survivor annuity rate be subject to reduction? ( a ) The monthly survivor annuity benefit of an employee who elects to credit NAFI service under subpart H of this part will be subject to reduction.
( b ) The reduction under paragraph (a) of this section equals: ( 1 ) The difference in the present value of the initial survivor annuity generated from the immediate annuity computation with credit for NAFI service and the initial survivor annuity generated from the deferred annuity computation without credit for NAFI service, divided by
( 2 ) The present value factor for the retiree's age (in full years) at the time of retirement.
( c ) The present value of the survivor annuity generated from the immediate annuity with credit for NAFI service in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is computed under the provisions of § 847.905 of this subpart.
( d ) The present value of the initial survivor annuity generated from the deferred annuity without credit for NAFI service in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is computed under the provisions of § 847.906 of this subpart.
( e ) The ages of the employee as of the commencing date of the immediate retirement and the commencing date of the deferred retirement are used to compute the present value of the survivor benefits under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
#### § 841.601 Purpose.

This subpart regulates the computation of interest under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS).
#### § 919.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered transactions?

All nonprocurement transactions, as defined in § 919.970, are covered transactions unless listed in § 919.215. (See appendix to this part.)