alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 841.706 Increases on combined CSRS/FERS annuities. ( a ) COLA's on combined CSRS/FERS annuities are computed by increasing the CSRS component by the percentage change and the FERS component by the amount of COLA's under § 841.703(a).
( b ) The initial monthly rate is computed by— ( 1 ) Applying CSRS rules to CSRS service to obtain the annual rate of the self-only annuity (as defined in § 831.603 of this chapter) based on the CSRS service; then
( 2 ) Applying FERS rules to FERS service to obtain the annual rate of annuity determined under § 842.403, § 842.405, § 842.406, or § 842.407 of this chapter based on the FERS service; then
( 3 ) Making any applicable FERS reductions for age and/or survivor benefits to the amounts computed under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section; then
( 4 ) Dividing the sum of the reduced amounts computed under paragraph (b)(3) of this section by 12; then
( 5 ) Dropping any cents.
( c ) The initial monthly CSRS component is computed by— ( 1 ) Applying CSRS rules to CSRS service to obtain the annual rate of the self-only annuity (as defined in § 831.603 of this chapter) based on the CSRS service; then
( 2 ) Making any applicable FERS reductions for age and/or survivor benefits; then
( 3 ) Dividing the annual amount by 12; then
( 4 ) Dropping any cents.
( d ) The initial monthly FERS component is computed by subtracting the initial monthly CSRS component from the initial monthly rate.
( e ) A retiree who was covered under FERS for at least one month has a FERS component. If the amount of the FERS component as computed under paragraph (d) of this section is zero (because the CSRS component is equal to the monthly rate, leaving no balance for the FERS component), the FERS component is $1 per month. The retiree is due a full dollar increase on the FERS component with the next COLA. An employee with less than a month of FERS service has no FERS component and is not due any FERS COLA's.
( f ) COLA's are determined by applying the appropriate increase to each component and rounding to the next lower dollar (each component must increase by at least one dollar if a COLA applies to each component) before adding them together for the new monthly amount payable.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Henry Coger, Appellant.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, John*605ston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. The motion for reargument is granted in view of the recent decision in *People*v. *Bichetti*(302 N. Y. 290). On reargument, the order of this court dated May 15, 1950, is vacated, and the decision of this court, made on the same date, is amended to read as follows: Order of the County Court, Queens County, denying a motion *coram nobis,*to vacate a judgment of that court which convicted defendant, on his plea of guilty, of the crimes of burglary, third degree, and petit larceny, reversed and the motion *coram nobis*is remitted to the County Court, Queens County, for the purpose of holding a trial and making a determination of the questions of fact arising upon said motion. (See *People*V. *Richetti,*302 N. Y. 290.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2245 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2245

 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to limit the non-
        Federal share of the cost of shore protection projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2003

  Mr. LoBiondo (for himself and Mr. Lampson) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to limit the non-
        Federal share of the cost of shore protection projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Beaches Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Shore Protection Projects.--
            ``(1) Prohibition on solicitation of excess 
        contributions.--The Secretary shall not solicit contributions 
        from non-Federal interests for costs of constructing projects 
        or measures for shore protection in excess of the non-Federal 
        share assigned to the appropriate project purposes listed in 
        subsections (a), (b), and (c).
            ``(2) Full payment of certain costs by non-federal 
        interests.--Paragraph (1) shall not limit the authority of the 
        Secretary to require non-Federal interests to pay the full cost 
        of work performed outside the authorized scope of a project.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 34.3

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” that HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Applicable Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions secured by credit card receivables that are identified in management’s “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (the Platform), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) arenot applicable to the Company’s activities. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Ourprocedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 30, 2009
#### § 919.710 When does a suspension take effect?

A suspension is effective when the suspending official signs the decision to suspend.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of FORE Holdings LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 5, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ David L. Hunt      
|                  |  |     |  | David L. Hunt          
|                  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
FORE Holdings LLC and will be retained by FORE Holdings LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of
the Form 10-Q.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levitt Corporation (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Alan B. LevanName:
    Alan B. LevanTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 9, 2005
#### Eva Barrett, Appellant-Respondent, v. Roy Perkins, Appellant, and Ann Frulla et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Eva Barrett, as Administratrix of the Estate of Lewis D. Barrett, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent, v. Roy Perkins, Appellant, and Ann Frulla et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

*868The plaintiffs in actions Nos. 1 and 2 may have one bill of costs against the defendant-appellant Perkins; insofar as the judgments of no cause of action are concerned no costs are allowed as against the plaintiffs. Present — • Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 12, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00916

- CR

Eberto A. MENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR2760 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On April 13, 2015, appellant’s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of his right to file his own brief and obtain a copy of

the record. Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Anton io 1997, no pet.); Bruns

v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Counsel provided appellant with an “Appellant’s Motion for Pro Se Access to the Appellate Record.” On April 13, 2015, the State filed a letter waiving its ri ght to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro se brief.

Appellant has not requested a copy of the appellate record. If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so no later than June 26, 2015

. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s co unsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further

order of the court.

We further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant, appellant’s counsel, the attorney for the State, and the clerk of the trial court._________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 847.608 Reduction in annuity due to deficiency.

Any annuity payable in the case of an employee who has made an election under subpart D of this part will include credit for the NAFI service. The monthly annuity rate on the date determined under § 847.603 will be permanently reduced by an amount equal to the amount of any deficiency divided by the present value factor for the annuitant's age on that date.
# L_2022291EN.01003301.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/33

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 154/2019

of 14 June 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2146]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1251 of 18 September 2018 not approving empenthrin as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1251 of 18 September 2018 not approving empenthrin as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzzzzv (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1985) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzzzzw. | 32018 D 1251: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1251 of 18 September 2018 not approving empenthrin as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18 (OJ L 235, 19.9.2018, p. 24).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzzzzw.

32018 D 1251: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1251 of 18 September 2018 not approving empenthrin as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 18 (OJ L 235, 19.9.2018, p. 24).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1251 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 235, 19.9.2018, p. 24.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FAA aviation news [microform]:a DOT/FAA flight standards safety publication.**
 
2001:Jan/Feb | Mar| Apr | May/Jun| Jul/Aug | Sep| Oct | Nov/Dec
2002:Jan/Feb | Mar| Apr | May/Jun| Jul/Aug | Sep/Oct| Nov/Dec
2003:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug| Sep/Oct | Nov/Dec
2004:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug| Sep/Oct | Nov/Dec
2005:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug | Sep/Oct | Nov/Dec
2006:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug | Sep/Oct| Nov/Dec
2007:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug | Sep/Oct| Nov/Dec
2008:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug| Sep/Oct | Nov/Dec
2009:Jan/Feb | Mar/Apr| May/Jun | Jul/Aug| Sep/Oct|Nov/Dec
2010:Jan/Feb
 
SuDoc Number:TD 4.9:
Item Number:0431-A-11 (MF)
CGP systemNumber:000569013
 
January 21, 2020
§ 847.431 Election requirements. ( a ) ( 1 ) ( i ) A NAFI employee who completed a qualifying move from FERS under § 847.402(a) may, instead of the election provided by § 847.411 (pertaining to elections of CSRS and FERS coverage), elect to remain subject to the current NAFI retirement system for all subsequent periods of service.
( ii ) Prior service under FERS becomes credible under the NAFI retirement system rules.
( 2 ) An NAFI employee who has had a previous opportunity to elect retirement coverage under § 847.202(e) or (f) is not excluded from making this election.
( b ) A survivor may make an election under paragraph (a) of this section if the employee was otherwise eligible, but died before expiration of the time limit under § 847.304.
( c ) An election under this section is irrevocable when received by the employing agency.
[61 FR 41721, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 2180, Jan. 16, 2003]
#### § 890.1020 Determining length of debarment based on false, wrongful, or deceptive claims.

Debarments under 5 U.S.C. 8902a(c)(4) and (5) and 5 U.S.C. 8902a(d)(1) and (2) shall be for a period of 3 years, subject to adjustment based on the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in § 890.1016.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Hewitt Holdings LLC (n/k/a FORE Holdings LLC) (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                     |  |                       |  | 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 4, 2004 |  | By: /s/ David L. Hunt
|                     |  | David L. Hunt        
|                     |  | Chairman
### §80307. Annual report

Not later than April 1 of each year, the corporation shall submit a report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be printed each year, with accompanying illustrations, as a separate House document of the session of the Congress to which the report is submitted.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1362.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 80307 | 36:37. | Mar. 16, 1950, ch. 62, §7, 64 Stat. 24; Aug. 14, 1953, ch. 486, §2, 67 Stat. 583; Aug. 30, 1964, Pub. L. 88–504, §4(2), 78 Stat. 636. |
| | 36:39. | Apr. 16, 1951, ch. 29, 65 Stat. 31. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in the first sentence of this section relating to the requirement that the corporation submit a report to Congress not later than April 1 of each year, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 200 of House Document No. 103–7.
#### § 930.114 Reports required.

An agency will submit to OPM, on request (a) a copy of agency orders and directives issued in compliance with this subpart; and (b) such other reports as OPM may require for adequate administration and evaluation of the motor vehicle operator program.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1917

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize military recreational 

facilities to be used by any veteran with a compensable service-connected 

disability. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize military 

recreational facilities to be used by any veteran with 

a compensable service-connected disability.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF MILITARY RECREATIONAL FACILITIES 

4 BY VETERANS WITH COMPENSABLE SERVICE5 CONNECTED DISABILITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 54 of title 10, United 

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section: 
2

•HR 1917 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 1066. Morale, welfare, and recreation facilities: use 

2 by veterans with compensable service3 connected disabilities 

4 ‘‘(a) DISABLED VETERANS.—A person who is a vet5 eran with a compensable service-connected disability (as 

6 determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs) shall be 

7 permitted to use MWR recreation facilities on the same 

8 basis as members entitled to retired pay. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEPENDENTS.—Dependents of a person who is 

10 permitted under subsection (a) to use MWR recreation fa11 cilities shall be permitted to use such facilities on the same 

12 basis as dependents of members entitled to retired pay. 

13 ‘‘(c) MWR RECREATION FACILITIES DEFINED.—In 

14 this section, the term ‘MWR recreation facilities’ means 

15 recreation facilities operated by nonappropriated fund ac16 tivities of the Department of Defense for the morale, wel17 fare, and recreation of members of the armed forces. Such 

18 term does not include exchange stores and other revenue19 generating facilities operated by those activities.’’. 

20 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such 

21 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following 

22 new item:

‘‘1066. Morale, welfare, and recreation retail facilities: use by veterans with 

compensable service-connected disabilities.’’.

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1066 of title 10, 

24 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 
3

•HR 1917 IH 

1 effect at the end of the 180-day period beginning on the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §150412. Service of process

With respect to service of process, the corporation shall comply with the laws of—

(1) the jurisdiction under which the corporation is incorporated; and

(2) those jurisdictions within the United States and its territories within which the corporation carries out activities in furtherance of the purposes of the corporation.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 937.)