alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC TO DISCUSS 2008 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

 FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Richland, Wash., on June 18, with 

representatives of Energy Northwest, to discuss the agency=s 2008 assessment of safety performance 

for the Columbia Generating Station. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at Energy 

Northwest’s Business Services Center, 3000 George Washington Way, Richland. 

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public on the safety performance of Columbia Generating Station, as well as the 

NRC=s role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of Columbia Generating Station and the 

nation=s other commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins 

said. AThis meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety 

performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.@

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the 

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wnp_2008q4.pdf. 

The NRC said the Columbia Generating Station operated safely during 2008 and will receive 

the detailed inspection regime during 2009 used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. 

These inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and 

by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. 

Current performance information for Columbia Generating Station is available on the NRC 

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WASH2/wash2_chart.html. 

 ### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 

No. IV-09-018 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128

May 27, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov
**Exhibit 31.2**

Certification ofChief Financial Officer

I, Geoffrey M.Boyd, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrols over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|        | November 13, 2006 |
|--------|------------------------|
|   |                   |   |
|   |                   |   |
|   | Sign:                  | /S/       Geoffrey  M. Boyd |   |
|   |                   | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|   |                   | Chief Financial  Officer |   |

 

----
#### § 831.2002 Eligibility for lump-sum payment upon filing an Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions (SF 2802).

Except as provided in §§ 831.2007 through 2009 or in section 3716 of title 31, United States Code, on administrative offset for government claims, a former employee or Member who has been separated from a covered position for at least 31 days at the time of filing an application for refund and who is ineligible for an annuity commencing within 31 days after the date of filing an application for refund is eligible for a refund for the total lump-sum credit to his or her credit in the Retirement Fund.
#### § 551.426 Time spent in charitable activities.

Time spent working for public or charitable purposes at an agency's request, or under an agency's direction or control, shall be considered hours of work. However, time spent voluntarily in such activities outside an employee's regular working hours is not hours of work.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1883

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1601–1 Main Street in Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘Eddie Mae Steward 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2003

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1601–1 Main Street in Jacksonville, Florida, 

as the ‘‘Eddie Mae Steward Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 1601–1 Main Street in Jacksonville, Florida, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Eddie Mae Steward 

7 Post Office’’. 
2

•HR 1883 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the Eddie Mae Steward Post Office.

Æ
(October 30, 1951.)

#### Fay J. Goldsmith, Appellant, *v.*Sam Goldsmith, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The action is for an annulment.

There are two causes of action set forth in the complaint: (1) for fraud based upon concealment of an incurable physical, mental and nervous disorder, and (2) for physical incapacity on the part of the husband.

*580As to the first cause of action we think that plaintiff adduced sufficient proof to establish that there was fraudulent concealment by defendant before marriage of a serious mental disorder and that the party deceived would not have consented to the marriage but for the fraudulent representation. As to the second cause of action we think there was adequate prima facie proof to establish that there was physical incapacity from the time of the marriage up to the time of the separation of the parties and that the incapacity was of such a nature as to be incurable. In our view the trial court should not have granted judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case as to either cause of action.

We desire to note that in an action of this kind the court has inherent power to order such a mental or physical examination as might be necessary to ascertain the nature and extent of the alleged disability *(Trovato*v. *Trovato,*262 App. Div. 276). Such examination might even be had during the progress of the trial so that the testimony of the examining medical expert may be received in aid of a proper decision. *(Gore*v. *Gore,*103 App. Div. 168.)

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN HEARING ON 

NEW REACTOR APPLICATION FOR COMANCHE PEAK SITE IN TEXAS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today announced the opportunity to participate in a 

hearing on a Combined License (COL) application for two new nuclear reactors at the Comanche 

Peak site near Glen Rose, Texas. 

Luminant Generation submitted the COL application and associated information Sept. 19, 

2008, and updated the application in November and December 2008. Luminant seeks approval to 

build and operate two U.S. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactors (US-APWR) at the site, about 

four miles north of Glen Rose. The NRC is currently reviewing the US-APWR for possible 

certification. The Comanche Peak application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is 

available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/comanchepeak.html . 

 The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the 

agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application and begin its technical review. Docketing 

the application does not preclude additional requests for information as the review proceeds; nor 

does it indicate whether the Commission will issue the license. The docket numbers established 

for this application are 52-034 and 52-035. 

 The NRC has issued in the Federal Register ( http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-

2455.pdf ) a notice of opportunity to intervene in the proceeding on the application, and the 

deadline for requesting a hearing is April 6. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest 

may be affected by the proposed license, who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding, 

and who meets criteria set out in the NRC’s regulations. Background information regarding the 

hearing process was provided by NRC staff to members of the public during a January public 

meeting in Glen Rose. 

Information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html . 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-023 February 5, 2009
 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 12-12237 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:04-cr-60038-WPD-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DELVIN MCKINNEY, 

a.k.a. Poochie, 

a.k.a. Poco, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(November 8, 2012)

Before BARKETT, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-12237 Date Filed: 11/08/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
Delvin McKinney appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for

a “complete direct review or evidentiary hearing” based on his contention that his

appellate counsel was not provided with a complete copy of his trial transcript

prior to his direct appeal. McKinney contends the district court abused its

discretion by denying his motion because his appellate counsel never received the

transcript of the afternoon session on February 18, 2005, and McKinney had a

right to a record on appeal that included a complete transcript of the trial. 

 The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying McKinney’s

motion. Even assuming some doubt regarding whether McKinney’s counsel 1

received a full copy of the February 18, 2005, transcript, McKinney’s essential

contention–that he was denied the right to effective assistance of appellate counsel

because of an incomplete record–is one that must be raised in a § 2255 motion. To

the extent that McKinney might seek to raise such a claim on collateral review, he

has previously filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which has been adjudicated on its

merits. See McKinney v. United States, S.D. Fla. Case No. 08-cv-60300. As

McKinney has not sought or obtained an order from this Court authorizing a

 We review a district court’s denial of a motion for evidentiary hearing for an abuse of 1

discretion. United States v. Massey, 89 F.3d 1433, 1443 (11th Cir. 1996).

2

Case: 12-12237 Date Filed: 11/08/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
second or successive § 2255 motion, there was no reason for the district court to

hold an evidentiary hearing. 

AFFIRMED.

3

Case: 12-12237 Date Filed: 11/08/2012 Page: 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                LIST OF HANARO TELECOM'S SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  PERCENTAGE OF
                                                                  OWNERSHIP AND              PERCENTAGE OF
                                                               VOTING INTEREST HELD       OWNERSHIP AND VOTING
                                                                 BY HANARO TELECOM         INTEREST HELD BY
                                            JURISDICTION OF              (%)               HANARO TELECOM (%)
            NAME                             INCORPORATION       AS OF DEC 31, 2002       AS OF APRIL 30, 2003
            ----                             -------------       ------------------       --------------------
<S>                                         <C>                <C>                        <C>
Hanaro Telecom America, Inc.                 Delaware, USA               100                        100
M-Commerce Co., Ltd.                             Korea                 30.29                      30.29
Hanaro WEB(n)TV Co., Ltd.                        Korea                 90.91                      90.91
Hanaro Realty Development &                      Korea                 99.99                      99.99
Management Co., Ltd.
Hanaro Telephone & Internet                      Korea                 99.99                      99.99
Information, Inc.
Dreamline Corporation                            Korea                 32.18                      32.18
HanaroDream Corp. (1)                            Korea                 42.14(1)                   42.14(1)
Korea Digital Cable Media Center (2)             Korea                 24.75                      24.75
</TABLE>

    (1)   Previously known as DreamX.net Co. Such percentage of ownership and
          voting interest represents the percentage held by Dreamline
          Corporation.

    (2)   In October 2002, we acquired a 24.75% equity interest in Korea Digital
          Cable Media Center.
NRC MEETING JUNE 12 IN GLEN ROSE, TEXAS, TO DISCUSS 

REVIEW PROCESS FOR EXPECTED NEW REACTOR APPLICATION 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting in Glen Rose, Texas, 

on Thursday, June 12, to discuss how the agency will review an expected Combined License 

(COL) application for two reactors at the Comanche Peak site, about four miles north of Glen 

Rose. The prospective applicant, Luminant Power, has told the NRC it intends to apply later this 

year for a license to build and operate two U.S.-Advanced Pressurized Water Reactors 

(US-APWR) reactors at the site. 

 “The NRC is coming to Glen Rose so that the community can learn about what’s being 

proposed and how we’ll review the application,” said David Matthews, Director of the Division 

of New Reactor Licensing in the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “When residents better 

understand the process they’re in a better position to provide valuable information we need 

during our reviews.” 

 The NRC will hold the meeting at the Expo and Texas Amphitheatre, 202 Bo Gibbs 

Blvd. in Glen Rose, from 7 p.m. until 9 p.m. NRC staff presentations will describe the overall 

Combined License review process, which includes safety and environmental assessments, as 

well as how the public can participate in the process. The NRC will host an open house for an 

hour prior to the meeting so members of the public have the opportunity to talk informally with 

agency staff. 

 A COL, if issued, provides authorization from the NRC to construct and, with conditions, 

operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site and in accordance with laws and regulations. 

More information on the NRC’s new reactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Web 

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html . 

 The US-APWR is a Mitsubishi Heavy Industries-designed 1,700 MWe pressurized-water 

reactor the NRC is currently reviewing for possible certification. More information regarding the 

review is available on the NRC’s Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert/apwr.html .

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-100 May 27, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 04/04-0330]

Notice is hereby given that Ballast Point Ventures III, L.P., 401 East Jackson Street, Suite 2300, Tampa, FL 33602, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing in a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act, Section 107.730, Financings which constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Ballast Point Ventures III, L.P. proposes to invest $5 million in YPrime Inc., 263 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) and § 107.730(a)(4) of the Regulations because Ballast Point Ventures II, LP and Ballast Point Ventures EF II, LP (together “BPV II”) and YPrime expect to receive $30 million and $5 million, respectively, from the proposed $52.5 million transaction, including $47.5 million from the lead investor and $5 million from the Licensee. BPV II and YPrime Inc. are Associates to the Licensee. Thus, this transaction constitutes a Conflict of Interest requiring SBA's prior written exemption.

                    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on this transaction within                           ( print page 67459)                        fifteen days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416.                

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2018-28313 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P