alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-007 May 3, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT GRAND GULF NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Entergy Operations officials on May

9, to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Grand Gulf nuclear plant

during 2005.

The 6 p.m. meeting at Port Gibson City Hall, 1005 College St., Port Gibson, Miss., is

open to public observation. Before the session ends, NRC staff will be available to answer

questions on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe plant

operation.

“Each year, the NRC assesses the performance of all of the nation’s commercial nuclear

power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “The meeting gives us an

opportunity to discuss our findings with the company, local officials and members of the public.

We look forward to meeting with members of the community and answering any questions they

may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2005 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/gg_2005q4.pdf .

Overall, Grand Gulf operated safely during the period. The NRC uses color-coded

inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear power plant performance. The

colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the

safety significance of the issues involved. Because all of the inspection findings and performance

indicators for the plant during the last quarter of 2005 were determined to be “green,” Grand Gulf

will receive a baseline (or routine) level of inspections during the upcoming assessment period. 
Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant operations to be inspected during the next year by NRC specialists are emergency

preparedness and radiological safety.

Current performance information for Grand Gulf is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/GG1/gg1_chart.html .

###
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Felicia C. Gutierrez, Respondent, against Republic Steel Corporation et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Superior Oil
and Gas Co. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006
(the "Report"),  I, Daniel Lloyd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  October 20, 2006
                                                      /s/ Daniel Lloyd
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Daniel Lloyd
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Termination Agreement of Kenneth D. Lewis



 Exhibit 10(n) 
  
 TERMINATION AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 9th day of December, 2003, by and between Kenneth D. Lewis
(“Executive”) and Bank of America Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”). 
  
 Statement of Purpose 
  
 Executive has been employed by the Corporation pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement dated April 10, 1998 and effective as of September 30, 1998, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”). The
Employment Agreement is currently scheduled to terminate effective September 30, 2004. At Executive’s request, the parties have determined to terminate the Employment Agreement effective as of the date hereof in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing statement of purpose and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Employment Agreement is terminated effective as of the date hereof,
provided that the “Confidential Information” provisions of Section 9 of the Employment Agreement shall remain in effect. In that regard, from and after the date hereof, as is the case with associates within the Corporation and its
subsidiaries generally, Executive shall have the right to terminate his employment at any time with or without cause or notice, and the Corporation reserves for itself an equal right. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. 
  

			
	BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    STEELE
ALPHIN        


	 	 	 Name: Steele Alphin
 Title: Corp. Personnel
Dir.

	
	“Corporation”
	
	 /s/    KENNETH D. LEWIS


	Kenneth D. Lewis
	
	“Executive”
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2315 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2315

    To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to certain 
    prohibitions relating to police badges, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2003

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to certain 
    prohibitions relating to police badges, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Badge Security Enhancement Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. POLICE BADGES.

    Section 716 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraphs (2) and (4); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (2); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d)(1) Whoever receives, in interstate or foreign commerce, a 
genuine or counterfeit police badge shall provide a certification of 
the intended use of that badge to the person or entity from which the 
badge is received.
    ``(2) Whoever knowingly transfers or transports in interstate or 
foreign commerce, a genuine or counterfeit police badge shall obtain 
written permission from the agency represented on the badge before 
doing so.
    ``(3) The Attorney General shall, by rule made on the record, 
establish additional procedures for the transfer or transportation of 
genuine and counterfeit police badges in interstate or foreign commerce 
to assure that a genuine or counterfeit police badge is not acquired 
under false pretenses that the badge will be used or is intended to be 
used for a purpose described in subsection (b) but then diverted to 
illegal purposes.
    ``(4) Whoever knowingly engages in conduct that violates paragraph 
(1) or (2), or a rule made under paragraph (3), shall be fined under 
this title or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.
    ``(5) This section shall not apply to the use of a genuine or 
counterfeit badge in the fictitious or historical visual depiction of 
either a public officer or employee.''.
                                 <all>
```
### [§406c. Renumbered §476c]
#### Lee A. Whitney, Appellant, v. George Dudley et al., Respondents.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of DeFi Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), undersigned, Jeff Rice, Chief Executive Officer and a Director, and Mark Sierra Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2009, and for the period then ended.    May  13, 2010By:/s/ Jeff RiceJeff RiceBy:Chief Executive Officer and a Director (Principal Executive Officer)
DeFi Global, Inc.

/s/ Mark Sierra
Mark Sierra
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) DeFi Global, Inc.
exv10w63



 







RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003



Exhibit 10.63




Richard A. Young

219 Winchester Beach Drive

Annapolis, MD 21401 USA


Dear Richard:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Richard A. Young
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: June 12, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 104,250

Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting



34,750 on 06/12/2004

34,750 on 06/12/2005

34,750 on 06/12/2006


By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Richard A. Young

	 	Date: ________________
	                     Richard A. Young
	 	 






Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals 

 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00560-CR

TRISTAN OMARR ARMSTRONG, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 226th District Court of Bexar County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2013-CR-5695).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 2, 

2014. The Supreme Court of Texas transferred the appeal from the Court of Appeals for 

the Fourth District of Texas to this Court. After submitting the case on the appellate 

record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial 

court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered October 27, 2015.

Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and 

Lloyd.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Huayang International
Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ Gao Wanjun
Gao Wanjun
Chief Executive Officer
April 23, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 227 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 227

  To eliminate the termination date on authority for schools with low 
      default rates to make single disbursements of student loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

    Mr. Wu introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To eliminate the termination date on authority for schools with low 
      default rates to make single disbursements of student loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TERMINATION DATE.

     Section 422(d) of the Higher Education Amendments of 1998 (112 
Stat. 1696) is amended by striking ``, and ending September 30, 2002''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2429.26 Other documents. ( a ) The Authority or the General Counsel, or their designated representatives, as appropriate, may in their discretion grant leave to file other documents as they deem appropriate.
( b ) A copy of such other documents shall be served on the other parties.
# L_2020068EN.01007601.xml

| 5.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/76

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 319/2019

of 13 December 2019

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2020/337]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1134 of 1 July 2019 amending Decision 2009/300/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/2099, as regards the period of validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to certain products, and of the related assessment and verification requirements (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1134 of 1 July 2019 amending Decision 2009/300/EC and Decision (EU) 2015/2099, as regards the period of validity of the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to certain products, and of the related assessment and verification requirements (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| (1) | the following is added in point 2d (Commission Decision (EU) 2015/2099):

  ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32019 D 1134: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1134 of 1 July 2019 (OJ L 179, 3.7.2019, p. 25).’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

the following is added in point 2d (Commission Decision (EU) 2015/2099):

‘, as amended by:

—

32019 D 1134: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1134 of 1 July 2019 (OJ L 179, 3.7.2019, p. 25).’;

| (2) | the following indent is added in point 2j (Commission Decision 2009/300/EC):






  ‘— | 32019 D 1134: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1134 of 1 July 2019 (OJ L 179, 3.7.2019, p. 25).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

(2)

the following indent is added in point 2j (Commission Decision 2009/300/EC):

‘—

32019 D 1134: Commission Decision (EU) 2019/1134 of 1 July 2019 (OJ L 179, 3.7.2019, p. 25).’

Article 2

The text of Decision (EU) 2019/1134 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1)

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 179, 3.7.2019, p. 25.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
No. II-10-079 November 18, 2010

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to Nuclear Fuel 

Services, a nuclear fuel processing facility in Erwin, Tenn., which has agreed to a series of 

corrective actions related to the company’s failure to provide the NRC with complete and accurate 

inspection information.

The order stems from a settlement achieved under the NRC’s Alternative Dispute 

Resolution process, which was initiated at the request of NFS to address violations linked to fire 

damper inspections. On July 20, the NRC notified NFS that an agency investigation had 

substantiated that a former NFS Industrial Safety Specialist had on two occasions willfully provided 

the NRC with incomplete and inaccurate information about the inspections.

NFS had documented to the NRC, on Nov. 22, 2008, that all of the fire dampers included in 

a specific procedure had passed inspection. In fact, 12 of the dampers had not been inspected, 

including three which had been designated as items relied upon for safety. The NRC investigation 

concluded that the former safety specialist’s actions had been willful.

A mediation session was held on Oct. 4 and a settlement was reached. A Confirmatory 

Order, issued Wednesday, outlines a number of corrective actions and enhancements NFS has 

agreed to take to ensure the NRC is provided with complete and accurate information in the future. 

As part of the order, NFS is required to submit a license amendment request that will incorporate its 

enhanced corrective action program into its license. The company also must develop and implement 

an appropriate safety culture improvement plan and conduct periodic independent safety culture 

assessments. 

The company took disciplinary action against the employee involved in the incident and that 

employee is no longer employed at the facility.

Copies of the Confirmatory Order will be posted on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/enforcement/actions.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's website.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### Robert Grafton, Respondent, v. John Oscar Ball, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
# L_2022267EN.01002701.xml

| 13.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 267/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 267/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 181/2022

of 10 June 2022

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1881]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/185 of 10 February 2022 correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/185 of 10 February 2022 correcting certain language versions of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451 laying down implementing technical standards for the application of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 14ab (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/451) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32022 R 0185: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/185 of 10 February 2022 (OJ L 30, 11.2.2022, p. 5).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32022 R 0185: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/185 of 10 February 2022 (OJ L 30, 11.2.2022, p. 5).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/185 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 June 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 30, 11.2.2022, p. 5.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Exhibit
      21.1






List
      of
      Subsidiaries











WebEx
      Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australia)


WebEx
      Asia Ltd. (Hong Kong)


WebEx
      China Ltd. (China)


WebEx
      Communications B.V. (Netherlands)


WebEx
      Communications Deutschland GmbH (Germany)


WebEx
      Communications France, SARL (France)


WebEx
      Communications India Pvt. Ltd. (India)


WebEx
      Communications Japan K.K. (Japan)


WebEx
      Communications U.K., Ltd. (UK)


WebEx
      Worldwide B.V. (Netherlands)


WebExOne,
      Inc. (incorporated in Delaware, headquarters in Burlington, MA)


Intranets
      K.K.
      (Japan)