alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED AUGUS T 29 , 20 1 

## •r-':PARTMF[^JTO F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N HA^'SP0RTAT!O^ |

OFFIC E O FHEARING S >./KF T QPERATIOK'

^ WASHINGTON , DC

• 201 ! AU G 3 0 Aq : 3 3 

### I N 'TH E MA'TTE

ROF CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penall y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-2011-077 3

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2O10SW27O039 ) ha s been assigne dto Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . Al l futur e pleading s andothe r

eommunieation s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA

A Hearin g Docket , andthe othe r person s on th e attache dServic e List .

Chie f Administrative/ ' Attacluncn t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S NO . FAA-2011-077 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W100 0

ON E COP Y Thoma s Newto n Boiling , Respondent' s Counse l Vic e Presiden t

an dAssociat e Genera l Counse l Unite dAirline s an dCont'wenta ] Airlines , Inc. , Responden t 1 1 W . Wacke r

Drive-I6'' ' Floo r Chicago , I L6060 1 TEL ; 312-997-806 8 FAX : 312-997-806 8 Ti mDuff , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 Southwes t

Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBIvd . Ft . Worth , T X 76193-000 7 TE L817-222-509 9 FA X 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' ScR'ic c wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r ser\'ic c i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 . Wasliington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
Merrimack,

Dec., 1898.

#### Seavey *v.*Dennett.

In an action for negligently poisoning a horse, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the expense of caring for the animal during its sickness and the cost of another equally serviceable.

Case, for negligently poisoning the plaintiff’s -horse. Trial by the court. The expense of caring for the horse while it was sick and of no use to the plaintiff was $14.50. The horse died, and it will cost the plaintiff $35 to replace it by another equally serviceable, although he could not have sold his hoTse in the market which his neighborhood afforded for more than $20. There was judgment for the plaintiff for $49.50, and the defendant excepted.

*Sargent, Hollis Niles,*for the plaintiff.

*William II. Sawyer,*for the defendant.

Young, J.

Damages are given to compensate the injured party for his loss ; and the measure of his damages in any given case is so much money as will compensate him for all loss which results directly from the wrong done him. *Fay*v. *Parker,*53 N. H. 342; *Hovey*v. *Grant,*52 N. H. 569, 581. The market value of goods which have been destroyed is not the measure of the injured party’s damages, but only evidence to be considered on that question; for “ a party may be greatly injured by the loss of goods which he cannot sell.” *Hovey*v. *Grant, supra.*Compensation being the rule, the plaintiff’s judgment was for the correct amount. It will take $49.50 to put him in as good condition as he was before the wrong was done; for he paid $14.50 for care of the horse when it was of no use to him *(Cornell*v. *Putnam,*58 N. H. 534), and it will cost him $35 to replace it by another as serviceable as the one he lost.

*Exception overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §40106. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1330.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40106 | 36:2602. | Aug. 17, 1984, Pub. L. 98–382, §2, 98 Stat. 1343. |

Section

The words "and subject to the laws of such State or States" are omitted as unnecessary.
# L_2020026EN.01006601.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/66

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 68/2018

of 23 March 2018

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2020/85]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2285 of 6 December 2017 Amending the user’s guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2285 of 6 December 2017 Amending the user’s guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 1eaj (Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1508) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘1eak. | 32017 D 2285: Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2285 of 6 December 2017 Amending the user’s guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 328, 12.12.2017, p. 38).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1eak.

32017 D 2285: Commission Decision (EU) 2017/2285 of 6 December 2017 Amending the user’s guide setting out the steps needed to participate in EMAS, under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 328, 12.12.2017, p. 38).’

Article 2

The text of Decision (EU) 2017/2285 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 March 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 328, 12.12.2017, p. 38.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Philip Shulman, Appellant, v. Harry J. Gruber et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Action for judgment declaring that an arbitration should be vacated and for an accounting by the arbitrator and by other defendants, who are alleged to be partners of plaintiff. Order granting motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
#### § 839.601 How do I make an election?

You may make your election using the form issued by OPM. If you are an employee, your employer will provide you with this form. If you are not a current employee, OPM will provide the form.
#### § 317.603 Selection.

An agency may make a noncareer or limited appointment without the use of merit staffing procedures. The appointee, however, must meet the qualifications requirements for the position, as determined in writing by the appointing authority.

[45 FR 62414, Sept. 19, 1980, as amended at 60 FR 6386, Feb. 2, 1995]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7309

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARIO SORTO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-96-251-A, CA-99-854-AM)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 22, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Sorto seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999),

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Sorto, Nos. CR-96-251-A; CA-99-854-AM (E.D. Va.

July 1 & Sept. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### § 894.106 Special provisions for *TRICARE-eligible individuals (TEI).*

Generally, applicable provisions of this part are effective for *TEIs.* Provisions that are specific to Federal *employees, annuitants* and their *family members* do not apply to *TEIs. See* § 894.101 for application of defined terms to *TEIs* and subpart H of this part for special provisions for *TEIs,* which governs in the event of ambiguity.

[83 FR 58178, Nov. 19, 2018]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC
MERCANTILE BANCORP

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year
ended December 31, 2007

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, I, Nancy A. Gray, certify that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: March 13, 2008



/S/ NANCY A. GRAYNancy A. GrayChief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Mercantile Bancorp and will be retained by Pacific Mercantile Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 04-123]


Notice of Prospective Patent Application License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Molecular NanoSystems Inc., of 
Palo Alto, CA, has applied for a co-exclusive license to practice the 
invention disclosed in NASA Case No. ARC-15173-1, entitled 
``Nanoengineered Thermal Materials Using Carbon Nanotube Array 
Composites,'' for which a U.S. Patent Application was filed and 
assigned to the United States of America as represented by the 
Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 
Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent 
to Ames Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by December 13, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Padilla, Chief Patent Counsel, 
NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, 
(650) 604-5104.

    Dated: November 2, 2004.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.
[FR Doc. 04-25123 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memor andum Opinion filed

June 21 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00038

- CR

IN RE JOVANY JAMP H ER PAREDES , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 337th District Court Harris County, T exas Trial Court C ause No. 1241896



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 24, 2022 , relator J o v a n y J amp h er Paredes filed a petition for

writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks t his Court to compel the Honorable
Colleen Gaido, presiding judge of the 337th District Court of Harris County

, to

rule on two pending motions: (1 ) “Motion for Forensic DNA Testing Under2

Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure” ; and (2) “Motion to App o int Counsil [sic] under Ch. 64.01 of the C.C.P.”

By Order dated April 26, 2022, this Cour t ad vised relator that his petition does not comply with Rules 52.3(j), 52.3 (k)

, and 52.7(a) of t he Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In th e Order, t he court notif i e d relator that “ his petition for

writ of mandamus will be d ismissed unless relator supplement s and/or amend s his petition to addr e sses the issue s identified above on or before May 2 6
, 202 2

. ”

To date, r elator has not supplemented or amended his petition t o comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and this Court ’ s Order. A s such,

relator ’ s petition for w rit of mandamus is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer

, and Spain. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Kay-Cee Properties, Inc., Respondent, v. Arnold Lampert, Appellant.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10632]

The Secretary of State determined on November 3, 2018, pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(D) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (NDAA), (Pub. L. 112-81), as amended, that as of November 3, 2018, each of the following jurisdictions have significantly reduced the volume of their crude oil purchases from Iran: China, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey.

Kent D. Logsdon,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Energy Resources, U.S. Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-28093 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-AE-P
Connor Woollums

Connor Woollums Photography & Video 

4986 Foxborough Court

Bettendorf, Iowa 52722

1 | P a g e

I, Connor Woollums, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333.

I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, Yuneec TYPHOON Q500+

Aircraft, to provide services for profit, including aerial photography, aerial videography, aerial surveying, 

aerial filming and photography in real estate applications, environmental studies and assessments, 

geological surveys, and special/private events (both public and private).

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre-Flight Safety Inspection. Only 

the manufacturer’s authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all repairs. Flights will not 

take place over densely populated areas or private property without the owner’s permission. The 

UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 

400 feet. The FAA can be confident that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent 

or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Todd Thomas, Drone Pics and Mike Lloyd 

& Associates, who have received Section 333 exemptions for comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21;

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 

14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5);

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a); 

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c);

14C.F.R. 91.109(a);
Connor Woollums

Connor Woollums Photography & Video 

4986 Foxborough Court

Bettendorf, Iowa 52722

2 | P a g e

14 C.F.R 91.7(a) 

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2);

14 C.F.R. 91.119;

14 C.F.R. 91.121;

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 91.405(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);

14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2};

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Thank you for your consideration in the granting of this petition. Please do not hesitate to contact me if 

you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Connor Woollums 

Connor Woollums

Connor Woollums Photography & Video

563-505-0112
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of China Growth      Development, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 18, 2008                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| /s/      Sam Liu                              |
| Sam      LiuChief Operating      Officer |
GAINESVflLE 

M A G A Z I N 

Riiiuly McCloi'v 

Account Executive 

2700 S.W. n"" Street, Gainesville, Plorida 32608 

(352)374-5071 

Randall,McClory@gvilIesun.com 

August 17,2010 

Aloha Ley _ ~- --

Associate Director ~" " j^^r^i^;"' 

Small Community Air Service Development Progrant (SCASDP) , ^ ~'^^rJ^-

nloha.lev(«).dQt.pov '_ ^ ^ ' 

Re: Smail ConnnuHfty Air Service Deveiopnieiit Grant ^-^ 

Dear Ms. Ley, 

The Gainesville Sun fully supports the Gaiiiesville-Alachua Counly Regional Airport Authorily's request 

for a Small Community Air Service Development grant to help support the new American Engle Airlines 

service between Gainesville and Miami and the existing local air carriers, Delta Air Lines and US 

Airways. We recognize the importance of air service to economic development and the quality of life for 

residents and visitors in our region. 

We want to help ensure the success of the new American Airlines service between Gainesville and the 

Miami hub. We are already working closely with the Airport Authority and matching funds spent. The 

lack of air sei-vice to South Florida and adequate connecting service to internatiofjaJ destinations has 

forced many to commute to and fiom other airports or make the exhausting 5+ hour trip to Miami by 

automobile. Additionally, American's extensive domestic and international route structure from Miami 

will provide new tiavel options and a greater level of frequency. 

Due to the critical Importance of quality air service for our region, we are committed to supporting 

American's new sei-vice and continued improvement in air seivice. Therefore, we will match funds spent 

with Gainesville Sun and Gainesville.com to help Aineiican Airlines establish its new route between 

GNV and MIA. With The Gainesville Sun and Gainesville.com's 192,780 daily readers, we believe our 

donation for advertising will help make the new sei'vice successful. 

I urge you to proceed with ap])roving the Airport Authority's request for a grant to assist with marketing 

efforts for the next two years. If you have any questions abotit Gainesville Sun, please feel free to contact 

me 

Sincerely, 

Randall J. McClory 

Account Executive 

Gainesville Sun/Gainesville.com 

Page 61
(November 12, 1943.)

#### Ben Jenkins et al., Respondents, *v.*Samuel Bloom, Defendant, and Mott Haven Feed Co., Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

There was no evidence that the brain injuries resulting in the neurological symptoms of the plaintiff Jenkins were permanent. The onjy medical witness offered by the plaintiff on that issue was unable to testify to their permanency. The question of the permanency of these injuries, therefore, should not have been submitted to the jury.

The judgment insofar as it is in favor of the plaintiff Hoffman should be affirmed, with costs, the action severed and the judgment, insofar as it is in favor of the plaintiff Jenkins, reversed and a new trial ordered as to said plaintiff, with costs to the defendants-appellants to abide the event.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Judgment insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Hoffman unanimously affirmed, with costs, the action severed and judgment, insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff Jerikins, unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered as to said plaintiff, with costs to the defendants-appellants to abide the event. Settle order on notice.