alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. I-09-002 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

 January 7, 2009 

 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION 

FOR SUSQUEHANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ON JAN. 13 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will discuss the results of an inspection of the 

proposed aging-management approach for the Susquehanna nuclear power plant on Tuesday, 

Jan. 13, at a meeting with the facility’s management. 

PPL Susquehanna, LLC, which owns and operates the Salem Township (Luzerne 

County), Pa., plant, has applied for a 20-year license extension for each of the two units at the 

site. The inspection is part of an ongoing review of that application. 

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. in the meeting room of the Eagles 

Building, at 107 S. Market St. in Berwick, Pa. After a discussion of the inspection results, NRC 

staff will conduct a question-and-answer session regarding the review for interested members of 

the public. 

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant has a 

term of 40 years. Companies may apply to renew those licenses for up to an additional two 

decades, provided that agency requirements are met. 

PPL applied to the NRC on Sept. 15, 2006, to renew the licenses for the Susquehanna 

reactors. If approved, the expiration date for Susquehanna Unit 1 would be extended to 

July 17, 2042; for Susquehanna Unit 2, the new expiration date would be March 23, 2044. 

 

An important aspect of the NRC license renewal review process is to ensure that a plant 

manages the effects of aging safety systems, structures and components through thorough 

monitoring and maintenance programs. At the meeting on Jan. 13, NRC staff will discuss what it 

found when it inspected the aging management programs proposed in the Susquehanna 

application. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
A copy of the Susquehanna license renewal application is available via the NRC’s web 

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/susquehanna.html. 

Additional information on the NRC’s license renewal review process is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart B to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.203 Waivers. ( a ) When a specified category of employees is covered by a classification system established under this subpart, the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 51 and 5 U.S.C. 5346, and related regulations, are waived with respect to that category of employees, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, § 9701.106, and § 9701.222(d) (with respect to OPM's authority under 5 U.S.C. 5112(b) and 5346(c) to act on requests for review of classification decisions).
( b ) Section 5108 of title 5, U.S. Code, dealing with the classification of positions above GS-15, is not waived.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PAYMENTS TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS
§ 950.402 Pledge form. ( a ) The Director will provide guidance with regard to the data required for electronic pledge processing.
( b ) An employee may not make a designation to an organization not listed in the Charity List. All pledges must be designated to specific CFC participating organization(s). No undesignated pledges will be allowed.
LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENT MAY 26 IN SAN LUIS OBISPO, 

CALIFORNIA, ON DIABLO CANYON REACTOR LICENSE RENEWAL 

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board handling the Diablo Canyon nuclear reactor 

license renewal proceeding will hear oral argument May 26 on the request by the San Luis 

Obispo Mothers for Peace (SLOMFP) for an evidentiary hearing. The Board is an independent 

quasi-judicial arm of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that decides legal challenges to 

applications and proposed licensing actions by the NRC. 

The oral argument will be presented by the lawyers representing SLOMFP, Pacific Gas & 

Electric (PG&E), and NRC staff. The session will begin at 8:30 a.m. PDT and may extend into 

the evening, if necessary, on Wednesday, May 26, in the San Luis Obispo County Board 

Chambers of the County Government Center, 1055 Monterey St. in San Luis Obispo. Although 

the oral argument will be limited to the lawyers for the litigants, the session is open to the public 

for observation. Early arrival is suggested to allow for security screening for all members of the 

public interested in attending. NRC policy prohibits signs, banners, posters or displays in the 

hearing room. 

PG&E submitted a license renewal application on Nov. 24, 2009, seeking a 20-year 

renewal of the operating licenses for Diablo Canyon Power Plant Units 1 and 2. The units are 

located approximately 12 miles southwest of San Luis Obispo. The Atomic Safety & Licensing 

Board is considering whether SLOMFP should be granted intervenor status in the proceeding. 

SLOMFP has submitted contentions challenging five aspects of PG&E’s application, along with 

a request to waive two NRC regulations so as to allow the admission of two of the contentions. 

All parties have filed extensive legal briefs on these issues. On May 26th the Board will listen to 

the lawyers’ arguments and ask them questions concerning the proposed contentions and waiver 

requests. 

Documents related to the Diablo Canyon license renewal application are available on the 

NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/diablocanyon.html. More information about the ASLB can be found at: http://www.nrc.gov/aboutnrc/organization/aslbpfuncdesc.html. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-078 May 3, 2010
No. II-10-045 June 10, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 NRC AUTHORIZES OPERATION OF LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES 

NATIONAL ENRICHMENT FACILITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed its readiness review of the 

Louisiana Energy Services gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in Lea County, N.M., and 

concluded that the facility can begin operation of the first cascade under its NRC license. A 

cascade is a series of rotating cylinders using centrifugal force to separate uranium isotopes. 

The LES URENCO USA Facility, located near the town of Eunice, was granted an NRC 

license in June 2006, and the company began constructing the site’s buildings, centrifuges and 

security structures. The license allows LES to enrich uranium up to five percent of the isotope 

uranium-235 for use in the manufacture of nuclear fuel for commercial power plants. 

LES is a subsidiary of URENCO, a company that has been using centrifuge technology in 

Europe for more than 30 years. 

During the construction of the LES facility, NRC inspectors conducted extensive 

evaluations to independently assess whether the plant was built in accordance with its design and 

NRC regulations. Once the construction was completed, further detailed NRC inspections looked 

at safety systems, training, operating procedures, security and other aspects of safe facility 

operation before the agency authorized operation of the enrichment facility first cascade. 

“Our inspectors have examined not only the construction and testing of systems, but the 

additional factors, including training and procedures,” said NRC Region II Administrator Luis 

Reyes. “Even after the first centrifuge is started, we will continue to inspect the operation to 

ensure the protection of people and the environment in the area.” 

The NRC staff will hold a public meeting in the area soon to discuss the decision to 

authorize operation as well as the continuing NRC oversight and inspection. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
#### Boniventure Pierce, an Infant, etc., by Nellie Pierce, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. William C. Willets, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ.
Martin, Michael (OST)

From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Bruce Gordon <bruce@btpost.net> Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:20 PM EAS (OST) Excursion Inlet EAS Contract PGP.sig 

## 2011 OCT 2b 

## P 3: 2Cl

I realize this is a bit late, but Ijustreturned from a two weekvacation, to the FlatLands and amjustnow getting to the backlog ofeMails, that had accumulated.
Concerning the Excursion Inlet, Alaska EAS Contract, I am speaking for the LOCAL Residents that are here, NOWand a few ofthe summer LOCAL Residents that I have talked to, recently. We are very pleased withthe Air Excursions contract, and the SERVICEthey are providing. Theyremember to Call, onWheels Up, inJuneau, and have beenvery easy to work with, since the change in Carriers on Sept. 15,2012.

One thing that shows the lack ofcommunications from Wings ofAlaska, the previous Carrier,

· is an issue that happened, in last week ofAugust, 2012. Wings decided to change to their "Winter

Schedule, (One a Week, Service) withNO Notification, to eitherthe Cannery, (Ocean Beauty Seafoods) the Post Office, orMyself. The Cannery was still operating, with 60 employees, and continued to operate until Sept 6, 2012. That week the Cannery Mail had 1500# ofMail, basically Bulk Parcels ofCanned Salmonthat the employees

were sending home, at FULL Priority Postage, as well as the normal First Class, that included Final Bill Payments from the Cannery as well as Final Checks, to fisherman. When informed that there was NO SERVICE that Wed, we were stuck, with 1500# ofMail, that was time sensitive, until the following Monday. When

we called into Wings, they were less than Helpful, and could only offer to Charter a Plane out for the original1500#, which was growing as people were leaving, by another 500# by that Friday. I was told by their Regional Manager, that they had fulfilled their "Contract" and that was it. This is NOTthe Accepted SERVICE, that has beenprovided, by ANY previous Carrier, onthe Contract. They have ALWAYS switched to Winter Schedule, AFTERthe Canneryhad "Closed for the Winter". This issue shows the lack ofSERVICE, extended by Wings ofAlaska, and lack ofcommunications about their Schedule Changes. The Cannery expressedthat they needed to move this Mail in a timely manner, but iftheyhad to Charter, to do so, "They would NOTbe paying Wings ofAlaska, a Single DIME, to do so. The Cannerythen arranged with AirExcursions, to come pickup that 1500# ofmail, that Thursday, at their expense. Air Excursions also showed in their filing, that they wouldbe flexible in Schedule changes, as needed bythe Cannery, ifthey were awarded the EAS Contract. We, the Residents, are very satisfied with they way things are, NOW, and hope that Wings ofAlaska's \ Request for Reconsideration, is denied.

1Bruce (semiretired powderman & exFCC Field Inspectorfor Southeastern Alaska)

Bruce Gordon* Debora Gordon R.N. P.O. Box EXI Juneau, Alaska 99850 AL7AQ * KL7WJ Bruce's Trading Post Excursion Inlet South Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850 www.btpost.net www.99850.net

2
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Montifiore G. Kahn, Appellant, and National City Bank of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
No. IV-09-007 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 March 18, 2009 

E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2008 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

 FOR WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Killona, La., on March 25 with 

representatives of Entergy Operations, to discuss the agency=s 2008 assessment of safety 

performance at the Waterford 3 nuclear plant. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. at the 

Entergy Education Center, 4224 Hwy. 3127, Killona. 

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public on the safety performance of Waterford 3, as well as the NRC=s role in 

ensuring safe plant operation. 

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of Waterford 3 and the nation=s other 

commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. AThis 

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance 

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.@

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the 

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wat_2008q4.pdf . 

The NRC said Waterford 3 operated safely during 2008 and will receive the very detailed 

core inspection regime used by the NRC for plants that are operating well during 2009. 

These inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and 

by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 
Current performance information for Waterford 3 is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WAT3/wat3_chart.html. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
---

(3,400.00)

Addendum to the loan agreement dated 28/10/2006

Extension

LOAN AGREEMENT

between

EDI Exploration Drilling International Holding GmbH
Represented by Managing Director Günter Thiemann Goethestrasse
61 45721 Haltern am See

- in the following referred to as
lender -

and

EDI Exploration Drilling International GmbH represented by
the Managing Director Christian Runge Goethestrasse 59 45721 Haltern
am See

- in the following referred to as borrower -

Effective immediately, the loan agreement, to which this
addendum applies, is changed in § 2 paragraphs 2 and 3 as follows:

§ 2 Interest, term and repayment of loan

| | 2. | The term shall be extended by approximately 9 months and
      ends on 31/03/2009.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 3. | The loan shall be repaid on 31/03/2009 into the lenders
      account.           

All other provisions of the agreement shall remain unchanged
and valid.

Haltern, 28/05/2008

|[Signature]      |  |                
|---------------- |  | ---------------
|                 |  |                
|EDI Holding GmbH |  | EDI GmbH       
|Günter Thiemann  |  | Christian Runge
|- Lender -       |  | - Borrower -   

[File name]

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 164 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 164

      To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Regula introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, notwithstanding 
any other authority of law, the mountain located 63 degrees 04 minutes 
12 seconds north, by 151 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds west shall 
continue to be named and referred to for all purposes as Mount 
McKinley.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 900.411 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of title VI is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of title VI.
### §50306. Restrictions

The corporation shall be nonpolitical and nonsectarian, and may not promote the candidacy of an individual seeking public office.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1345.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50306 | 36:90f. | June 17, 1932, ch. 268, §6, 47 Stat. 321; July 15, 1942, ch. 505, §4, 56 Stat. 660. |

Section

The words "as an organization" are omitted as unnecessary.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-9043-1]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa/​*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements

Filed 12/17/2018 Through 12/20/2018

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search*

EIS No. 20180320, Final, BLM, WY, Lost Creek Uranium In-Situ Recover Project Modifications, Review Period Ends: 01/28/2019, Contact: Annette Treat 307-328-4314

EIS No. 20180321, Final, DOE, CA, Remediation of Area IV and the Northern Buffer Zone of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Review Period Ends: 01/28/2019, Contact: Stephanie Jennings 805-842-3864

EIS No. 20180322, Draft, APHIS, PRO, Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cricket Suppression Program, Comment Period Ends: 02/11/2019, Contact: Jim Warren 202-316-3216

EIS No. 20180323, Draft Supplement, DOE, KY, Disposition of Depleted Uranium Oxide Conversion Product Generated from DOE's Inventory of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride, Comment Period Ends: 02/11/2019, Contact: Jaffet Ferrer-Torres 202-586-0730

EIS No. 20180324, Draft, BLM, AK, Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, Comment Period Ends: 02/11/2019, Contact: Nicole Hayes 907-271-4354

## Amended Notices

EIS No. 20180272, Draft, USN, NV, Fallon Range Training Complex Modernization, Comment Period Ends: 02/14/2019, Contact: Sara Goodwin 619-532-4463 Revision to FR Notice Published 11/16/2018; Extending the Comment Period from 01/15/2019 to 02/14/2019.

Dated: December 21, 2018.

Robert Tomiak,

Director, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2018-28208 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
§ 5001.104 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) Before engaging in any outside employment, whether or not for compensation, an employee of the Interstate Commerce Commission, other than a Commissioner, must obtain the written approval of his or her supervisor and the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO). Requests for approval shall be forwarded through normal supervisory channels to the DAEO and shall include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) A statement of the name of the person, group, or other organization for whom the work is to be performed; the type of work to be performed; and the proposed hours of work and approximate dates of employment;
( 2 ) The employee's certification that the outside employment will not depend in any way on information obtained as a result of the employee's official Government position;
( 3 ) The employee's certification that no official duty time or Government property, resources, or facilities not available to the general public will be used in connection with the outside employment;
( 4 ) The employee's certification that he or she has read, is familiar with, and will abide by the restrictions contained in all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including those found in 18 U.S.C. chapter 11 and those found or referenced in subpart H (“Outside Activities”) of 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch); and
( 5 ) The written approval of the employee's immediate supervisor.
( b ) Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation.
( c ) For purposes of this section, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment, business relationship or activity involving the provision of personal services by the employee, whether or not for compensation. It includes but is not limited to personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher or speaker. It includes writing when done under an arrangement with another person for production or publication of the written product. Prior approval is not required, however, to participate in the activities of a nonprofit charitable, religious, professional, social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service, or civic organization, unless such activities involve the provision of professional services or advice or are for compensation other than reimbursement for expenses.
#### §§ 723.152-723.159 [Reserved]