alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §50324. Presentation of State and Local Law Enforcement Badges

#### (a) Presentation by Member of Congress

A Member of Congress may present a State and Local Law Enforcement Badge to any State and Local Law Enforcement Badge recipient who resides in such Member's congressional district. If both a Senator and Representative choose to present a State and Local Law Enforcement Badge, such Senator and Representative shall make a joint presentation.

#### (b) Presentation by Attorney General

If no Member of Congress chooses to present the State and Local Law Enforcement Badge as described in subsection (a), the Attorney General, or a designee of the Attorney General, shall present such State and Local Law Enforcement Badge.

#### (c) Presentation arrangements

The office of the Member of Congress presenting each State and Local Law Enforcement Badge may make arrangements for the presentation of such State and Local Law Enforcement Badge, and if a Senator and Representative choose to participate jointly as described in subsection (a), the Members shall make joint arrangements. The State and Local Board shall facilitate any such presentation arrangements as requested by the congressional office presenting the State and Local Law Enforcement Badge and shall make arrangements in cases not undertaken by Members of Congress.

(Pub. L. 110–298, title II, §204, July 31, 2008, 122 Stat. 2993.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15254 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Exhibit 13.1



906 Certification



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certificate set
forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Ted Sun, the Acting Chief Executive Officer of NetEase.com, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
NetEase, Inc.



Date: June 22, 2005



|       |  |                               
|------ |  | ------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Ted Sun                   
|Name:  |  | Ted Sun                       
|Title: |  | Acting Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Subpart F of Part 531
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart F of part 531 appear at 70 FR 31305, May 31, 2005.

§ 531.610 Treatment of locality rate as basic pay. A locality rate is considered to be an employee's rate of basic pay only for the purpose of computing or applying— ( a ) Retirement deductions, contributions, and benefits under 5 U.S.C. chapters 83 and 84;
( b ) Life insurance premiums and benefits under 5 U.S.C. chapter 87;
( c ) Premium pay under 5 U.S.C. chapter 55, subchapter V, and 5 CFR part 550, subparts A and I (including the computation of limitations on premium pay);
( d ) Severance pay under 5 U.S.C. 5595 and 5 CFR part 550, subpart G;
( e ) Advances in pay under 5 U.S.C. 5524a and 5 CFR part 550, subpart B;
( f ) Post differentials under 5 U.S.C. 5925(a) and danger pay allowances under 5 U.S.C. 5928 for an employee temporarily working in a foreign area when the employee's official worksite is located in a locality pay area;
( g ) Nonforeign area cost-of-living allowances and post differentials under 5 U.S.C. 5941 and 5 CFR part 591, subpart B;
( h ) Recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives, supervisory differentials, and extended assignment incentives under 5 U.S.C. chapter 57, subchapter IV, and 5 CFR part 575;
( i ) Performance-based cash awards under 5 U.S.C. 4505a and 5 CFR part 451, subpart A, when such awards are computed as a percentage of an employee's rate of basic pay;
( j ) GS pay administration provisions (e.g., GS promotion provisions) to the extent provided in subpart B of this part;
( k ) Pay administration provisions for prevailing rate employees which consider rates of basic pay under the GS pay system in setting pay (except as otherwise provided in 5 CFR part 532), subject to the requirement that, if the employee's actual locality rate would not apply at the official worksite for the prevailing rate position, that locality rate must be converted to a corresponding rate on the locality rate schedule for that official worksite;
( l ) Lump-sum payments under 5 CFR part 550, subpart L, for accumulated and accrued annual leave;
( m ) Grade and pay retention under 5 U.S.C. chapter 53, subchapter VI, to the extent provided by 5 CFR part 536;
( n ) Other provisions as specified in other statute or OPM regulations; and
( o ) Payments or benefits equivalent to those listed in this section under other legal authority, as determined by the head of the agency or other authorized official responsible for administering such payments or benefits.
[70 FR 31304, May 31, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 74996, Dec. 19, 2005; 73 FR 66154, Nov. 7, 2008; 76 FR 68634, Nov. 7, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Pure Resources, Inc.

          We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No's. 333-48346, 333-34970, 333-37868 and 333-37870) on Form S-8 of
Pure Resources, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2002, except for Note 22
which is dated July 26, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Pure
Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and owner's
net investment and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in
the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Pure
Resources, Inc. Our report refers to a change in accounting for derivative
instruments and hedging activities.


                                    KPMG LLP

Midland, Texas
July 26, 2002
<HTML>
<head>
<meta NAME="DESCRIPTION" CONTENT="  ">
<TITLE>RM Magazine-McCoy Msg</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<body bgcolor=#FFFFBF>



<CENTER><H1>A Message from the Assistant Secretary of The Army (FM&C)</h1></CENTER>
<P>
<P><BR>
	In this issue of <I>Resource Management</I>, and the one following, I want to 
focus attention on training and developing our workforce to meet the challenges of the 
next century.  We are now in the midst of a major review of the Army's financial 
management function, processes and systems.  The training implications of such a review 
are extensive.
<P>
	Our workforce professionals at all levels need to approach the challenges ahead 
with a spirit of confidence in their own abilities and competitiveness as the nation's best 
stewards of its public trust.  We foster that bright-spirited approach by being attentive to 
our people's training needs and by making professional development a priority mission 
requirement everywhere.  We do it also by recognizing work well done under the aegis of 
our investment in training.  That is where this issue of the RM publication comes in.
<P>
	Look at this issue as a kind of FM "refrigerator door," where some of our 
professional family's best recent school assignments have been posted.  Inside are several 
cogent articles which are the products of our careerists' educational growth through the 
Advanced Resource Management Course, the Professional Military Comptroller School, 
and the Army Comptrollership Program.  The articles represent a return on training 
investment that has been made by the authors themselves, their supervisors and the Army 
as a whole.  All three parties have shared in the necessary investment, by contributing 
"time, talent and treasure."  Comments from readers, as always, are welcome.
<P>
	Our training theme will continue in the next issue, which will focus on Army-
wide professional development opportunities.  In the meantime, I ask all of you, as you 
reflect daily on ways we could improve the financial management function, to think in 
terms of how we ought best to train and develop our people as part of that improvement.
<P>
<P><BR>
<P><BR>
<P><BR>
<center><B>Helen T. McCoy</B><BR>
<I>Assistant Secretary of the Army<BR>
(Financial Management and Comptroller) </i></center>

<P>
<HR ALIGN=center SIZE=8 NOSHADE>
<P>
<CENTER>
<TABLE>
<TD HEIGHT=100 WIDTH=60>
<TD HEIGHT=100 WIDTH=60>
<a href="cov-toc.htm#toc"><IMG SRC="/images/icons/but-toc.gif" ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="TOC" BORDER="0"></A></TD>
</TD>
<TD HEIGHT=100 WIDTH=60>
<a href="02pdasa.htm"><IMG SRC="/images/icons/but-next.gif" ALIGN=BOTTOM ALT="Next" BORDER="0"></A>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</CENTER>


</BODY>

</HTML>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 18, 2016

s0928 

# Order

Clerk October 18, 2016

152927

SUSANA E. NARVAEZ TERAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152927

COA: 322016

Otsego CC: 10

- 013744

- DP

MICHAEL R. RITTLEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2020026EN.01006501.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/65

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 67/2018

of 23 March 2018

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2020/84]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2159 of 20 November 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 as regards certain references to ICAO provisions (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2159 of 20 November 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 255/2010 as regards certain references to ICAO provisions (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66wi (Commission Regulation (EU) No 255/2010) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 2159: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2159 of 20 November 2017 (OJ L 304, 21.11.2017, p. 45).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 2159: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2159 of 20 November 2017 (OJ L 304, 21.11.2017, p. 45).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2159 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 March 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 21.11.2017, p. 45.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Stefano Luisoni, Respondent, v. Hinrich Schottler et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously modified so as to eliminate items 6, 7, 8 and 13 and, as so modified, affirmed. Such items are neither proper nor *861necessary under the pleadings. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
§ 890.1036 Information considered in deciding a contest. ( a ) *Presenting information and arguments to the suspending official.* A provider may submit documents and written arguments in opposition to the suspension, and may appear personally, or through a representative, before the suspending official to provide any other relevant information.
( b ) *Specific factual basis for contesting the suspension.* The provider shall identify specific facts that contradict the basis for the suspension as stated in the suspension notice. A general denial of the basis for suspension does not raise a genuine dispute over facts material to the suspension, and the suspending official shall not give such a denial any probative weight.
( c ) *Mandatory disclosures.* Any provider contesting a suspension shall disclose the items of information set forth in § 890.1023(c). Failure to provide such information completely and accurately may be a basis for OPM to initiate further legal or administrative action against the provider.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tortuga Mexican
Imports, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Eduardo Avila, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 16, 2008

Eduardo Avila

/s/ Eduardo AvilaChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
### §21005. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the bylaws and articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the bylaws and articles of incorporation.

(c) Nondiscrimination.—The requirements for serving as a director or officer may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, age, or national origin.

(Added Pub. L. 105–354, §1(5)(A), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3243.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21005(a) | 36 App.:5906. | Aug. 13, 1998, Pub. L. 105–231, §§6, 7, 8(g) (related to directors and officers), 112 Stat. 1531. |
| 21005(b) | 36 App.:5907. | |
| 21005(c) | 36 App.:5908(g) (related to directors and officers). | |

Section

In subsections (a) and (b), the words "Except as provided in section 5908(g) of this title" and "and in conformity with the laws of the State of Texas" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "The requirements for serving as a director or officer" are substituted for "in determining the requirements for serving on the board of directors or as an officer of the association" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NEIL ANAND,

Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 669 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of June, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
§ 848.701 Death of phased retiree during phased employment. ( a ) For the purpose of 5 U.S.C. chapter 84, subchapter IV— ( 1 ) The death of a phased retiree is deemed to be a death in service of an employee; and
( 2 ) The phased retirement period is deemed to have been a period of part-time employment with the work schedule described in § 848.202(a)(1) and (b) for the purpose of determining survivor benefits. The part-time proration adjustment for the phased retirement period will be based upon the employee's officially established part-time work schedule, with no credit for extra hours worked. In determining the employee's deemed rate of basic pay during the phased retirement period, only basic pay for hours within the employee's officially established part-time work schedule may be considered. No pay received for other hours during the phased retirement period may be included as part of basic pay for the purpose of computing retirement benefits, notwithstanding the normally applicable rules.
Exhibit 32.1   WINGS & THINGS, INC.   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  • the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  • the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  March  18, 2010/s/ Greg L. Popp
Greg L. Popp
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET FEB. 5-7 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting Feb. 5-7 in Rockville, Md., to discuss several issues of 

current interest. Topics include: digital upgrade of the Oconee nuclear power plant’s reactor 

protection system and engineered safety features, safety and security interface in reactors, and 

options to revise radiation protection regulations and guidance. 

 The ACRS advises the Commission, independently from the NRC staff, on safety issues 

related to the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants and in areas of health physics and 

radiation protection. The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint 

North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. Sessions on Feb. 5 and Feb. 6 will run from 8:30 a.m. 

to 7 p.m., and the Feb. 7 session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. Portions of this meeting may 

be closed to protect proprietary information. 

A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2009/. 

 

 Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting 

should contact Girija Shukla, at (301) 415-6855. To pursue video conferencing services, contact 

Theron Brown, at (301) 415-8066. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-017 January 26, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Report on Form  10-KSB of  Technol  Fuel
Conditioners,  Inc.  for the year  ended  December  31,  2003,  I,  Mel  Hooper,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such  Report on Form  10-KSB  for the year ended  December  31,  2003,  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained  in such Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003,  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Technol Fuel Conditioners, Inc.

Dated: May 18, 2004

/s/ Mel Hooper
-----------------
By: /s/ Mel Hooper, President
and acting Chief Financial Officer
#### Rose M. Carrock, Doing Business under the Name of Carrock & Son, Respondent, v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Allied Market Employees, Local 63, et al., Defendants, and Gus Charles et al., Defendants-Appellants.

*1058Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
§ 838.401 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart regulates the procedures that the Office of Personnel Management will follow upon the receipt of claims arising out of State court orders that affect refunds of employee contributions under CSRS or FERS. OPM must comply with court orders, decrees, or court-approved property settlements in connection with divorces, annulments of marriages, or legal separations of employees or retirees that— ( 1 ) Award a portion of a refund of employee contributions to a former spouse; or
( 2 ) If the requirements of §§ 838.431 and 838.505 are met, bar payment of a refund of employee contributions.
( b ) This subpart prescribes— ( 1 ) The circumstances that must occur before refunds of employee contributions are available to satisfy a court order acceptable for processing; and
( 2 ) The procedures that a former spouse must follow when applying for a portion of a refund of employee contributions based on a court order under section 8345(j) or section 8467 of title 5, United States Code.
( c ) ( 1 ) Subpart E of this part contains the rules that a court order directed at a refund of employee contributions must satisfy to be a court order acceptable for processing.
( 2 ) Subpart F of this part contains definitions that OPM uses to determine the effect on a refund of employee contributions of a court order acceptable for processing.
### §30507. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation and its subordinate divisions have the exclusive right to use the name "Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc.". The corporation has the exclusive right to use, and to allow others to use, seals, emblems, and badges the corporation adopts.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1321.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30507 | 36:956. | July 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–653, §16, 74 Stat. 518. |

Section

The word "sole" is omitted as included in "exclusive". The words "and no other organization shall use the name 'Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc.' " are omitted as unnecessary. The words "and to allow others to use" are substituted for "or to allow or refuse the use of" for consistency in the revised title. The words "the corporation adopts" are substituted for "as have heretofore been used by the Blue Star Mothers of America" for consistency in the revised title.