alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018215EN.01005001.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 215/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 215/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 252/2016

of 2 December 2016

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1188]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/775 of 18 May 2016 on the benchmark to allocate greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge to aircraft operators pursuant to Article 3f(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/775 of 18 May 2016 on the benchmark to allocate greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge to aircraft operators pursuant to Article 3f(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 21alh (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1123/2013) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘21ali. | 32016 D 0775: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/775 of 18 May 2016 on the benchmark to allocate greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge to aircraft operators pursuant to Article 3f(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 128, 19.5.2016, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘21ali.

32016 D 0775: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/775 of 18 May 2016 on the benchmark to allocate greenhouse gas emission allowances free of charge to aircraft operators pursuant to Article 3f(5) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 128, 19.5.2016, p. 10).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/775 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 128, 19.5.2016, p. 10.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### John W. Ingles, appellant, v. Charles F. Grothe, appellee.

Filed March 16, 1911.

No. 16,344.

Appeal: Conflicting Evidence. In an action at law, where no question of law is involved, and tlie evidence is conflicting and so evenly balanced that it would be sufficient to sustain a judgment either way, the judgment of the district court will not be disturbed on appeal.

Appeal from the district court for Saline county: Leslie G. Hurd, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*746*Hastings & Ireland*and *J. H. Grimm & Son,*for appellant.

*Price & Abbott, contra.*

Fawcett, J.

Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of the northeast quarter of section 9, township 7, range 3, in Salino county; that the defendant at many and divers times between October, 1905, and the 1st of November, 1907, “forcibly and illegally entered said premises, and without the consent of the plaintiff tore down and damaged his fences thereon, dug holes and ditches in the ground, ploughed, scraped and made embankments thereon, and hauled dirt and soil from said premises, and appropriated the same to his own use,” to the great damage of plaintiff, etc. The answer is a general denial, coupled with the plea that defendant has an easement over plaintiff’s land for a millrace used in connection with his water-power mill, and that all of the work done and soil removed was within the limits of said millrace, which defendant and his grantors have used for mill purposes ever since the year 1870. The reply admits the easement, but denies all the other allegations of the answer. A jury was waived, and trial had to the court. Defendant prevailed, and plaintiff appeals.

The case was tried in the district court upon the theory that defendant has an easement only for his millrace across plaintiff’s land, and that he has no right to take the soil from plaintiff’s land to repair his race upon other lands, but that within the limits of his race he can use the soil as he sees fit; and the contention, upon which a large amount of testimony was offered on each side, was as to the eastern or northern boundary of the race. If that boundary is as testified to by plaintiff and his witnesses, defendant was a trespasser, and plaintiff should have recovered. On the other hand if it is as testified to by *747defendant and bis witnesses, defendant was witbin tbe boundaries of bis race, and tbe judgment of tbe district court is right. Tbis is a law action. No controverted questions of law are involved. The evidence is in sharp conflict. As it appears in cold type in tbe record, it would sustain a judgment either way. Tbe court saw the witnesses upon tbe stand, heard them testify, and in addition thereto personally viewed tbe premises. In such a case, we cannot substitute our judgment for that of tbe trial court.

Tbe judgment of tbe district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Letton, J., not sitting.
# L_2017189EN.01002201.xml

| 20.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 189/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 16/2016

of 5 February 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1299]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1491 of 3 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘virginiamycin’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1491 of 3 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘virginiamycin’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1492 of 3 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘tylvalosin’ (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1492 of 3 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘tylvalosin’ (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indents are added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 1491: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1491 of 3 September 2015 (OJ L 231, 4.9.2015, p. 7), |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 1491: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1491 of 3 September 2015 (OJ L 231, 4.9.2015, p. 7),

| — | 32015 R 1492: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1492 of 3 September 2015 (OJ L 231, 4.9.2015, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 R 1492: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1492 of 3 September 2015 (OJ L 231, 4.9.2015, p. 10).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Regulations (EU) 2015/1491 and (EU) 2015/1492 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 February 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 231, 4.9.2015, p. 7.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 231, 4.9.2015, p. 10.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      David A. Gestetner, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
      (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
                David A. Gestetner
            
            President,
                Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the
                Board
            
            June
                22, 2006David
                A. Gestetner
            
            (Principal
                Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial
                and Accounting Officer)
§ 870.403 Withholdings and contributions following a Living Benefit election. ( a ) Withholdings and contributions for Basic insurance for an individual who elects a full Living Benefit under subpart K of this part stop at the end of the pay period in which the Living Benefit election is effective.
( b ) Withholdings and contributions for Basic insurance for an employee who elects a partial Living Benefit under subpart K of this part are based on the post-election BIA. This reduction in withholdings and contributions starts at the end of the pay period in which the Living Benefit election is effective.
( c ) Withholdings and contributions for Basic insurance for an annuitant or compensationer who elected a partial Living Benefit as an employee are based on the post-election BIA.
( d ) There is no change in withholdings for Optional insurance for individuals who elect a Living Benefit.
[62 FR 48731, Sept. 17, 1997; 62 FR 52181, Oct. 6, 1997]
HP Nanum Pigment Process Flow Diagram, Part 1

( )
### §119. National Day of Prayer

The President shall issue each year a proclamation designating the first Thursday in May as a National Day of Prayer on which the people of the United States may turn to God in prayer and meditation at churches, in groups, and as individuals.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1258.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 119 | 36:169h. | Apr. 17, 1952, ch. 216, 66 Stat. 64; May 5, 1988, Pub. L. 100–307, 102 Stat. 456. |

Section
§ 848.102 Definitions. In this subpart— *Authorized agency official* means— ( 1 ) For the executive branch agencies, the head of an Executive agency as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105;
( 2 ) For the legislative branch, the Secretary of the Senate, the Clerk of the House of Representatives, or the head of any other legislative branch agency;
( 3 ) For the judicial branch, the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts;
( 4 ) For the Postal Service, the Postmaster General;
( 5 ) For any other independent establishment that is an entity of the Federal Government, the head of the establishment; or
( 6 ) An official who is authorized to act for an official named in paragraphs (1)-(5) in the matter concerned.
*Composite retirement annuity* means the annuity computed when a phased retiree attains full retirement status.
*Director* means the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.
*Full retirement status* means that a phased retiree has ceased employment and is entitled, upon application, to a composite retirement annuity.
*Full-time* means— ( 1 ) An officially established recurring basic workweek consisting of 40 hours within the employee's administrative workweek (as established under § 610.111 of this chapter or similar authority); or
( 2 ) An officially established recurring basic work requirement of 80 hours per biweekly pay period (as established for employees with a flexible or compressed work schedule under 5 U.S.C. chapter 61, subchapter II, or similar authority).
*Phased employment* means the less-than-full-time employment of a phased retiree.
*Phased retiree* means a retirement-eligible employee who— ( 1 ) With the concurrence of an authorized agency official, enters phased retirement status; and
( 2 ) Has not entered full retirement status;
*Phased retirement annuity* means the annuity payable under 5 U.S.C. 8412a before full retirement.
*Phased retirement percentage* means the percentage which, when added to the working percentage for a phased retiree, produces a sum of 100 percent.
*Phased retirement period* means the period beginning on the date on which an individual becomes entitled to receive a phased retirement annuity and ending on the date on which the individual dies or separates from phased employment.
*Phased retirement status* means that a phased retiree is concurrently employed in phased employment and eligible to receive a phased retirement annuity.
*Working percentage* has the meaning given that term in § 848.202(a).
### §21504. Acquisition and management of property

The corporation may acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer property, in the United States and France, to carry out the purposes of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1296.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21504 | 36:4902. | Jan. 30, 1913, ch. 21, §2, 37 Stat. 654; June 14, 1929, ch. 23, 46 Stat. 11; Oct. 1, 1965, Pub. L. 89–231, §1, 79 Stat. 901. |

Section

The words "may acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer" are substituted for "is authorized to take by purchase, gift, grant, devise, and bequest, and to hold, mortgage, lease, transfer, and convey" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "real and personal" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "to carry out the purpose of the corporation" are substituted for "for the purposes of the said corporation" and "as may be deemed necessary for the wants or development of the corporation or any of them" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
§ 630.302 Maximum annual leave accumulation—forty-five day limitation. ( a ) The effective date on which an employee (otherwise eligible thereunder) becomes subject to section 6304(b) of title 5, United States Code, is the: ( 1 ) Date of his entry on duty when he is employed locally;
( 2 ) Date of his arrival at a post of regular assignment for duty; or
( 3 ) Date on which he begins to perform duty in an area outside the United States and the area of recruitment or from which transferred, when the employee is required to perform duty en route to his post of regular assignment for duty.
( b ) Subject to section 6304(c) of title 5, United States Code, the maximum amount of annual leave that may be carried forward into the next leave year by an employee who is transferred or reassigned to a position in which he is no longer subject to section 6304(b) of that title is determined as follows: ( 1 ) When, on the date prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section, the amount of an employee's accumulated and accrued annual leave is 30 days or less, he may carry forward the amount prescribed by section 6304(a) of title 5, United States Code;
( 2 ) When, on the date prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section, the amount of an employee's accumulated and accrued annual leave is more than 30 days but not more than 45 days, he may carry forward the full amount thereof that is unused at the end of the current leave year;
( 3 ) When, on the date prescribed by paragraph (c) of this section, the amount of an employee's accumulated and accrued annual leave is more than 45 days, he may carry forward the amount of unused annual leave to his credit at the end of the current leave year that does not exceed: ( i ) 45 days, if he is not entitled to a greater accumulation under section 6304(c) of title 5, United States Code; or
( ii ) The amount he is entitled to accumulate under section 6304(c) of that title, if that amount is greater than 45 days.
( c ) For the purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, an agency shall determine the amount of an employee's accumulated and accrued annual leave at the end of the pay period which includes: ( 1 ) The date on which the employee departs from his post of regular assignment for transfer or reassignment, except that when the employee is required to perform duty en route in an area in which he would be subject to section 6304(b) of title 5, United States Code, if assigned there, it is the date on which he ceases to perform the duty; or
( 2 ) The date on which final administrative approval is given to effect a change in the employee's duty station when he is on detail or leave in the United States, or in an area (the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or a territory or possession of the United States) from which he was recruited or transferred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fellie Cherry, Appellant.

Motion for reargument granted. Upon reargument, the court adheres to the original determination. Assuming, *arguendo,*that the detention of appellant was a false arrest, which he might resist, he nevertheless had no right to use more force than such resistance required. The trial court has found that the testimony of the police officers was true. That being so, there was no cause for appellant to apprehend bodily harm, and his violent conduct in biting a police officer supports the conclusion that thereby he committed an assault. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 948.]
# L_2019036EN.01003601.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 89/2017

of 5 May 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/201]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/227 of 9 February 2017 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards bis(pentabromophenyl)ether (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/227 of 9 February 2017 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards bis(pentabromophenyl)ether (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 0227: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/227 of 9 February 2017 (OJ L 35, 10.2.2017, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 0227: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/227 of 9 February 2017 (OJ L 35, 10.2.2017, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/227 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 May 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 35, 10.2.2017, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Memo to Project File and Final Copy of 9/24/08 NRC Onsite Observation Report.

Accession Number: ML091470241

Date Released: Thursday, June 4, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML091470243 - Memo to Project File Re: Final Copy of the September 24, 2008 NRC Onsite Observation Report for the INL INTEC Tank Farm Facility. (2 page(s), 5/27/2009)
    - ML090540613 - R. Mark Shaw Ltr Re: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Onsite Observation Report for the Idaho National Laboratory Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center Tank Farm Facility. (10 page(s), 9/24/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer