alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation 

Complete when issuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure. 

0 No Change from existing AD action 

2 0 I "f- C f?"- as ( - liD 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

/j you make change., to the \'alue.' in the table hi!lm1, youmn't t'llsure the total.\ update accordingly. /j 

the) do not. dick (or Tah) into and !hen olll ofthe cll<lllgt?d cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

Action propeller, appliance) 

(e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

(include cost (labor + u.s. tor U.S. Fleet replacement) access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

Existing models 

Inspect wing lift 

struts and wing lift 8.0 22,000 

strut forks 

Install placard 1.0 $30 22,000 

I 

ll ' , I I 

' 

l 

Additional models 

Inspect wing lift 

struts and wing lift 8.0 200 

strut forks 

Install placard 1.0 $30 200 

; 

c ' 

' 

' 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 17,649,000 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that 

was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The 200 products are 

only the incremental change in U.S. registered aircraft for the extended applicability. This is beyond 

the economic analysis of the existing AD 99-01-05 Rl which affects approximately 22,000 aircraft. 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • 

YES* 0 NO[gj 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO[gj 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. G 

YES 0 NO[gj 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES* 0 NO [gj 

*Explanation:
BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                        Certified Public Accountant


1582 TULITA DRIVE                           OFFICE (702) 361-8414
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89123                    FAX NO. (702) 896-0278


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Whom It May Concern:
                                                          January 2, 2001

     The  firm  of  Barry  L. Friedman, P.C., Certified  Public  Accountant
consents  to  the inclusion of their report of  January 2,  2001,  on  the
Financial Statements of YFC 355 Corp., as of December 31, 2000, in
any filings  that are  necessary  now  or  in the near future with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,

/s/ Barry L. Friedman

Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
```

[Federal Register: June 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 112)]
[Notices]               
[Page 33376]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11jn10-128]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7045]

 
Determination Related to Serbia Under Section 7072(c) of the 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 111-117)

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including under section 7072(c) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. 
L. 111-117), and the President's Delegation of Responsibilities Related 
to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, dated March 22, 2001, I hereby 
determine and certify that the Government of Serbia is:
    (1) Cooperating with the International Criminal Tribunal for the 
former Yugoslavia, including access for investigators, the provision of 
documents, timely information on the location, movement, and sources of 
financial support of indictees, and the surrender and transfer of 
indictees or assistance in their apprehension, including Ratko Mladic;
    (2) Taking steps that are consistent with the Dayton Accords to end 
Serbian financial, political, security and other support which has 
served to maintain separate Republika Srpska institutions; and
    (3) Taking steps to implement policies, which reflect a respect for 
minority rights and the rule of law.
    This Determination and related Memorandum of Justification shall be 
provided to the appropriate committees of the Congress. This 
Determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 27, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-14130 Filed 6-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
```
#### Esther Lehrman, Respondent, v. Harry Lehrman, etc., Appellant.

Motion for stay granted. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
§ 843.313 Elections between survivor annuities. ( a ) A current spouse annuity cannot be reinstated under § 843.305 unless— ( 1 ) The surviving spouse elects to receive the reinstated current spouse annuity instead of any other payments (except any accrued but unpaid annuity and any unpaid employee contributions) to which he or she may be entitled under FERS, or any other retirement system for Government employees, by reason of the remarriage; and
( 2 ) Any lump sum paid on termination of the annuity is returned to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund.
( b ) A current spouse is entitled to a current spouse annuity based on an election under § 842.612 only upon electing this current spouse annuity instead of any other payments (except any accrued but unpaid annuity and any unpaid employee contributions) to which he or she may be entitled under FERS, or any other retirement system for Government employees.
( c ) A former spouse who marries a retiree is entitled to a former spouse annuity based on an election by that retiree under § 842.611, or a qualifying court order terminating that marriage to that retiree only upon electing this former spouse annuity instead of any other payments (except any accrued but unpaid annuity and any unpaid employee contributions) to which he or she may be entitled under FERS, or any other retirement system for Government employees.
( d ) As used in this section, “any other retirement system for Government employees” does not include Survivor Benefit Payments from a military retirement system or social security benefits.
[57 FR 54681, Nov. 20, 1992]
§ 843.406 Proof of dependency. ( a ) A child is considered to have been dependent on the deceased employee or retiree if he or she is— ( 1 ) A legitimate child; or
( 2 ) An adopted child; or
( 3 ) A stepchild or recognized natural child who lived with the employee or retiree in a regular parent-child relationship at the time of the employee's or retirees death; or
( 4 ) A recognized natural child for whom a judicial determination of support was obtained; or
( 5 ) A recognized natural child to whose support the employee or retiree made regular and substantial contributions.
( b ) The following are examples of proofs of regular and substantial support. More than one of the following proofs may be required to show support of a natural child who did not live with the employee or retiree in a regular parent-child relationship and for whom a judicial determination of support was not obtained. ( 1 ) Evidence of eligibility as a dependent child for benefits under other State or Federal programs;
( 2 ) Proof of inclusion of the child as a dependent on the decedent's income tax returns for the years immediately before the employee's or retiree's death;
( 3 ) Cancelled checks, money orders, or receipts for periodic payments received from the employee or retiree for or on behalf of the child;
( 4 ) Evidence of goods or services that show regular contributions of considerable value;
( 5 ) Proof of coverage of the child as a family member under the employee's or retiree's Federal Employees Health Benefits enrollment; and
( 6 ) Other proof of a similar nature that OPM may find to be sufficient to demonstrate support or parentage.
( c ) Survivor benefits may be denied— ( 1 ) If evidence shows that the deceased employee or retiree did not recognize the claimant as his or her own despite a willingness to support the child; or
( 2 ) If evidence casts doubt upon the parentage of the claimant, despite the deceased employee's or retiree's recognition and support of the child.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App 1, Section 10), that a meeting of the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory Commission will be held on December 6, 2004. 

The Commission was reestablished pursuant to Public Law 87-126 as amended by Public Law 105-280. The purpose of the Commission is to consult with the Secretary of the Interior, or his designee, with respect to matters relating to the development of Cape Cod National Seashore, and with respect to carrying out the provisions of sections 4 and 5 of the Act establishing the Seashore. 

The Commission members will meet at 1 p.m. at Headquarters, Marconi Station, Wellfleet, Massachusetts for the regular business meeting to discuss the following: 

1. Adoption of Agenda 

2. Approval of Minutes of Previous Meeting (September 27, 2004) 

3. Reports of Officers 

4. Reports of Subcommittees 

5. Superintendent's Report: Update on ORV Permit Distribution Process; Update on Salt Pond Visitor Center Project; Update on Highlands Center Project; Update on Hunting EIS; Update on Treatment of Phragmites at Pamet Bog; Proposed Herring River Restoration Project; News from Washington 

6. Old Business: Role of Dune Shack Sub-Committee in Reviewing Ethnography Report 

7. New Business 

8. Date and agenda for next meeting 

9. Public comment and 

10. Adjournment 

The meeting is open to the public. It is expected that 15 persons will be able to attend the meeting in addition to Commission members. 

Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the Commission during the business meeting or file written statements. Such requests should be made to the park superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting. Further information concerning the meeting may be obtained from the Superintendent, Cape Cod National Seashore, 99 Marconi Site Road, Wellfleet, MA 02667. 

Dated: October 13, 2004. 

Michael B. Murray, 

Acting Superintendent. 

[FR Doc. 04-24982 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
**Exhibit32.2**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS OF INSIGHT CAPITAL, INC.**

Theundersigned hereby certify that the annual report on Form 10-K ofInsight Capital, Inc. (“the registrant”) for the year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.
|        | /s/ MICHAEL S.  WILLNER                                                                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S. WillnerChairman and Chief  Executive Officer  Insight Capital, Inc.March 30, 2006 |

                                                
|        | /s/ JOHN ABBOT                                                                                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | John AbbotExecutive  Vice President and 

Chief  Financial Officer  Insight Capital, Inc.March 30, 2006 |

 

----
§ 838.211 Amounts subject to court orders. ( a ) ( 1 ) Employee annuities other than phased retirement annuities are subject to court orders acceptable for processing only if all of the conditions necessary for payment of the employee annuity to the former employee have been met, including, but not limited to— ( i ) Separation from a position in the Federal service covered by CSRS or FERS under subpart B of part 831 of this chapter or subpart A of part 842 of this chapter, respectively;
( ii ) Application for payment of the employee annuity by the former employee; and
( iii ) The former employee's immediate entitlement to an employee annuity.
( 2 ) Money held by an employing agency or OPM that may be payable at some future date is not available for payment under court orders directed at employee annuities.
( 3 ) OPM cannot pay a former spouse a portion of an employee annuity before the employee annuity begins to accrue.
( 4 ) Payment to a former spouse under a court order may not exceed the net annuity.
( b ) ( 1 ) Phased retirement annuities are subject to court orders acceptable for processing only if all of the conditions necessary for payment of the phased retirement annuity to the phased retiree have been met, including, but not limited to— ( i ) Entry of the employee into phased retirement status under 5 CFR part 831, subpart Q, or part 848 of this chapter, respectively;
( ii ) Application for payment of the phased retirement annuity by the phased retiree; and
( iii ) The phased retiree's entitlement to a phased retirement annuity.
( 2 ) Money held by an employing agency or OPM that may be payable at some future date is not available for payment under court orders directed at phased retirement annuities.
( 3 ) OPM cannot pay a former spouse a portion of a phased retirement annuity before the employee annuity begins to accrue.
( 4 ) Payment to a former spouse under a court order may not exceed the phased retirement annuity.
( c ) Waivers of employee annuity payments under the terms of section 8345(d) or section 8465(a) of title 5, United States Code, exclude the waived portion of the annuity from availability for payment under a court order if such waivers are postmarked or received before the date that OPM receives a court order acceptable for processing.
[57 FR 33574, July 29, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 46626, Aug. 8, 2014]
#### § 890.504 Disposition of contingency reserves upon reorganization or merger of plans.

Upon reorganization or merger of a plan, OPM must credit to the surviving plan the reserves of the reorganized or merged plan. If more than one plan survives, the reserves must be divided among the surviving plans in proportion to the number of enrollees continuing to subscribe to the surviving plans.

[54 FR 52339, Dec. 21, 1989; 55 FR 22891, June 5, 1990]
§ 330.203 RPL Eligibility. An employee must meet the conditions in either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section to be an RPL eligible. ( a ) For eligibility based on part 351 of this chapter, the employee: ( 1 ) Must be serving in an appointment in the competitive service in tenure group I or II;
( 2 ) Must have received either a specific notice of separation or a Certification of Expected Separation under part 351 of this chapter that has not been cancelled, rescinded, or modified so that the employee is no longer under notice of separation;
( 3 ) Must have received a rating of record of at least fully successful (Level 3) or equivalent as the most recent performance rating of record; and
( 4 ) Must not have declined an offer under part 351, subpart G, of this chapter of a position with the same type of work schedule and with a representative rate at least as high as that of the position from which the employee will be separated.
( b ) For eligibility based on part 353 of this chapter, the employee or former employee: ( 1 ) Must be serving in, or separated from, an appointment in the competitive service in tenure group I or II;
( 2 ) Must either have accepted a position at a lower grade or pay level in lieu of separation or have been separated because of a compensable injury or disability. (For the purposes of this subpart, any reference to the position from which an individual was or will be separated includes the position from which the RPL eligible accepted the lower graded or pay level position under this paragraph.);
( 3 ) Must have fully recovered more than 1 year after compensation began; and
( 4 ) Must have received notification from the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of Labor, that injury compensation benefits have ceased or will cease.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Louis Monsky, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

All concur.
ComEd Specification EM13050 - Dry-Type, Indoor, Single PhaseSpecification Limiting Dimensions and WeightCurrent Design Being PurchasedCatalog IDCapacity (kVA)Pri Volt (V)Sec Volt (V)Height (in.)Width (in.)Depth (in.)Weight (lbs)Height (in.)Width (in.)Depth (in.)Weight (lbs)131686775.07200120/24062.035.529.5115062.035.529.51150131691775.0720027762.035.529.5115062.035.529.511501316868100.07200120/24062.035.529.5140062.035.529.514001316918100.0720027762.035.529.5140062.035.529.514001316871167.07200120/24062.035.529.5180062.035.529.518001316921167.0720027762.035.529.5180062.035.529.518001316873250.07200120/24066.040.035.0255066.040.035.024001316923250.0720027766.040.035.0255066.040.035.024001316875333.07200120/24070.042.035.0305066.040.035.029201316925333.0720027770.042.035.0305066.040.035.030001316877500.07200120/24076.049.035.0415075.049.035.039501316927500.0720027776.049.035.0415075.049.035.03550
April 15, 2014

Mr. John Varley

Senior Vice President and General Counsel Virgin America, Inc. 555 Airport Boulevard, Suite 500 Burlingame, CA 94010

Dear Mr. Varley:

This is in response to your January 9, 2014, letter sent to the public docket (Docket No. FAA-2013-0128) petitioning the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Virgin Airlines, Inc. (Virgin America) for an extension to its exemption from § 121.803(c)(3) and Appendix A of part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would conti nue to provide Virgin America relief from the requirement to include Atropine in an Emergency Medical Kit (EMK).

Your exemption request is now covered under Exemption No. 10690C (copy enclosed) in

Docket No. FAA-2013-0034. In that action, the FAA amended the Airlines for America, Regional Airlines Association, and National Ai r Carriers Association exemption to include all similarly-situated air carriers.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under Exemption No. 10690C, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Leslie H. Smith Manager, Air Transportation Division

Enclosure
#### Edgar Fitch, Respondent, v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. of New York et al., Appellants. Martha Fitch, Respondent, v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. of New York et al., Appellants.

Separate appeals by defendants from an order of the Supreme Court, Cortland County, entered in each action denying motions to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffs sue in negligence. Defendants moved at Special Term for dismissal in pursuance of rule 107 on the ground the causes of action pleaded had been released. The motion was denied. Attached to the moving papers are exhibits purported to have been signed by the plaintiffs who are husband and wife, each releasing all defendants for a stated consideration. Each plaintiff denies under oath “having ever made or executed a release to ” the two principal defendants and “ that therefore ” each release referred to in the moving papers “ is wholly without foundation of fact and is totally false and untrue.” These broad denials, however, seem addressed to plaintiffs’ main contention that the instruments signed by them were signed as a result of misrepresentations of fact. Whether the plaintiffs are bound by the releases relied upon by defendants in the motions to dismiss is a question which on the record presented here ought not to be decided on affidavits. We think, however, that the issue ought to be tried first before the main causes of action of plaintiffs are heard *(Burton*v. *Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,*280 App. Div. 356). If and when the defenses of release are pleaded, the application for separate trial may be addressed to the Trial Term. Orders unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. Present- — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE0212 7

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 870.206 Accidental death and dismemberment. ( a ) ( 1 ) Accidental death and dismemberment coverage is an automatic part of Basic and Option A insurance for employees.
( 2 ) There is no accidental death and dismemberment coverage with Option B or Option C.
( 3 ) Individuals who are insured as annuitants or compensationers do not have accidental death and dismemberment coverage.
( b ) ( 1 ) Under Basic insurance, accidental death benefits are equal to the BIA, but without the age factor described in § 870.202(c).
( 2 ) Under Option A, accidental death benefits are equal to the amount of Option A.
( c ) ( 1 ) Under Basic insurance, accidental dismemberment benefits for the loss of a hand, foot, or the vision in one eye are equal to one-half the BIA. For loss of 2 or more of these in a single accident, benefits are equal to the BIA.
( 2 ) Under Option A, accidental dismemberment benefits for the loss of a hand, foot, or the vision in one eye are equal to one-half the amount of Option A. For loss of 2 or more of these in a single accident, benefits are equal to the amount of Option A.
( 3 ) Accidental dismemberment benefits are paid to the employee.
( 4 ) Accidental death benefits are paid to the employee's beneficiaries.
[75 FR 60577, Oct. 1, 2010]
§ 334.107 Termination of agreement. ( a ) An assignment may be terminated at any time at the request of the Federal agency or the State, local, Indian tribal government, institution of higher education, or other organization participating in this program. Where possible, the party terminating the assignment prior to the agreed upon date should provide 30-days advance notice along with a statement of reasons, to the other parties to the agreement.
( b ) Federal assignees continue to encumber the positions they occupied prior to assignment, and the position is subject to any personnel actions that might normally occur. At the end of the assignment, the employee must be allowed to resume the duties of the employee's position or must be reassigned to another position of like pay and grade.
( c ) An assignment is terminated automatically when the employer-employee relationship ceases to exist between the assignee or original employer.
( d ) OPM has the authority to direct Federal agencies to terminate assignments or take other corrective actions when OPM finds assignments have been made in violation of the requirements of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act or this part.