alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2020210EN.01003201.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 66/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/819]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 of 17 December 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) and diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 of 17 December 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), dibutyl phthalate (DBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) and diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 2005: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 of 17 December 2018 (OJ L 322, 18.12.2018, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 2005: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 of 17 December 2018 (OJ L 322, 18.12.2018, p. 14).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2018/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 322, 18.12.2018, p. 14.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 PURPOSES
 DEFINITIONS




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



STOCK
  ADMINISTRATION
 Procedure
 Powers of the Committee
 Effect of the Committees Decision
 ELIGIBILITY
 3




---



##### 



TERM OF PLAN
 STOCK OPTIONS
 Term of Option .
 Exercise Price And Consideration .
 Price
     Certain Corporate Transactions
 4




---



##### 



Payment
 Exercise Of Option .
 Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Shareholder
 Termination of Status as an Employee
 5




---



##### 



Disability of Optionee
 Death of Optionee
   Transferability Of Options .
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
 In General .
    6




---



##### 



Vesting Date .
    7




---



##### 



Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards .
                8




---



##### 



Dividend Rights .
 Voting Rights .
 Tender Offers .
 Designation of Beneficiary .
 Taxes .
 9




---



##### 



ADJUSTMENTS UPON CHANGES IN CAPITALIZATION OR MERGER
    10




---



##### 



TIME FOR GRANTING OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
 AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF THE PLAN
 Committee Action; Shareholders Approval .
 Effect of Amendment or Termination .
 CONDITIONS UPON ISSUANCE OF SHARES
  RESERVATION OF SHARES
 11




---



##### 



STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT; AWARD NOTICE
 SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL
 OTHER PROVISIONS
 INDEMNIFICATION OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS
 NO OBLIGATION TO EXERCISE OPTION
 WITHHOLDINGS; TAX MATTERS
  12




---



##### 



OTHER COMPENSATION PLANS
 SINGULAR, PLURAL; GENDER
 HEADINGS, ETC. NO PART OF PLAN
 SEVERABILITY
 13
# L_2016211EN.01006801.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/68

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 111/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1294]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 repeals Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 repeals Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003 of 20 November 2003 (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 66q (Commission Regulation (EC) No 2042/2003) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement shall be replaced by the following:

‘
  32014 R 1321: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 of 26 November 2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (OJ L 362, 17.12.2014, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 362, 17.12.2014, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 315, 28.11.2003, p. 1.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 842.1002 Definitions. As used in this subpart: *Agency head* means the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. For purposes of an approval of coverage under this subpart, agency head is also deemed to include the designated representative of the Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, except that the designated representative must be a department headquarters-level official who reports directly to the Secretary of Homeland Security, or to the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, and who is the sole such representative for the entire department. For the purposes of a denial of coverage under this subpart, agency head is also deemed to include the designated representative of the Secretary of Department of Homeland Security at any level within the Department of Homeland Security.
*Customs and border protection officer* means an employee in the Department of Homeland Security occupying a position within the Customs and Border Protection Officer (GS-1895) job series (determined applying the criteria in effect as of September 1, 2007) or any successor position and whose duties include activities relating to the arrival and departure of persons, conveyances, and merchandise at ports of entry. Also included in this definition is an employee engaged in this activity who is transferred directly to a supervisory or administrative position in the Department of Homeland Security after performing such duties in 1 or more positions within the GS-1895 job series (determined applying the criteria in effect as of September 1, 2007), or any successor position, for at least 3 years.
*Employee* means an employee as defined by 5 U.S.C. 8401(11).
*First-level supervisors* are employees classified as supervisors who have direct and regular contact with the employees they supervise. First-level supervisors do not have subordinate supervisors. A first-level supervisor may occupy a primary position or a secondary position if the appropriate definition is met.
*Primary position* means a position classified within the Customs and Border Protection Officer (GS-1895) job series (determined applying the criteria in effect as of September 1, 2007) or any successor position whose duties include the performance of work directly connected with activities relating to the arrival and departure of persons, conveyances, and merchandise at ports of entry.
*Secondary position* means a position within the Department of Homeland Security that is either— ( 1 ) Supervisory; i.e., a position whose primary duties are as a first-level supervisor of customs and border protection officers in primary positions; or
( 2 ) Administrative; i.e., an executive, managerial, technical, semiprofessional, or professional position for which experience in a primary customs and border protection officer position is a prerequisite.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.21    
    


 
  AMENDMENT NO. 2
  TO
  ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
  SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN    
    


        Alliance Data Systems Corporation hereby adopts this Amendment No. 2 to the Alliance Data Systems Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
"Plan"). The Amendment is effective January 1, 2004. 


	1.
	Section 3.1
is amended to read as follows: 




3.1. Eligibility. All full time Associates who are on the United States payroll of an Employer are eligible to participate in the SERP provided
(1) the Associate's Regular Compensation is at least $150,000 on an annual basis, or the Associate's Eligible Compensation was at least $170,000 as of December 31st, 2003,
and has not fallen below that amount in any subsequent year, and (2) the Associate is a participant in the Qualified Plan. 




	2.
	Section 3.2
shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 




3.2 Enrollment Procedure. Each Participant shall be eligible for a Restorative Contribution and a Section 415 Contribution without application.
To be eligible for Elective Contributions, a Participant must file an Enrollment Form, a model of which is attached as Exhibit A, prior to the beginning of the calendar year for which the
enrollment is to be effective or, in the first calendar year in which an Associate becomes eligible to participate in the Plan, no later than thirty (30) days after the first day of such
eligibility and effective for services to be performed subsequent to the election. 




	3.
	Section 11.4
shall be amended by substituting the State of Delaware for the State of Ohio therein. 



Adopted
this 12th day of December, 2003, but effective as provided above. 



	 	 	ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
	

 	
 	

Dwayne H. Tucker

	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  DWAYNE H. TUCKER      






	 	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	












QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.21


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ALLIANCE DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
No. 89-1410.

#### Zannino *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Employer Status Determination

Pioneer Railcorp

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board with respect

to the employer status of Pioneer Railcorp under the Railroad

Retirement (RRA) and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts (RUIA).

In a letter dated March 11, 1993, Mr. Daniel A. LaKemper, stated

that Pioneer was incorporated on January 31, 1986, and that it

began operations on October 1, 1988. He stated that Pioneer is a

holding company which owns the common stock of six class III

railroads. Pioneer performs management services and property

management. The management services include corporate planning,

financial, legal and management services for its affiliated

railroads. Ninety eight percent of Pioneer's revenue is derived

from its affiliated railroads, two percent is derived from nonrailroad activities.

Section 1 of the RRA defines the term "employer" to include:

(i) any express company, sleeping car company, and

carrier by railroad, subject to subchapter I of chapter

105 of Title 49;

(ii) any company which is directly or indirectly

owned or controlled by, or under common control with, one

or more employers as defined in paragraph (i) of this

subdivision, and which operates any equipment or facility

or performs any service (except trucking service, casual

service, and the casual operation of equipment or

facilities) in connection with the transportation of

passengers or property by railroads, or the receipt,

delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration

or icing, storage, or handling of property transported by

railroad. [45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)(i) and (ii)]

Section 1(a) of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. § 351(a)) contains essentially

the same definition.

A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the

Federal Circuit regarding a claim for refund of taxes under the

RRTA held that a parent corporation which owns a rail carrier

subsidiary is not under common control with the subsidiary within

the meaning of §3231. Union Pacific Corporation v. United States,

5 F. 3d 523 (Fed. Cir., 1993).

The relevant facts of the Union Pacific case are indistinguishable

from those presented by Pioneer. Accordingly, a majority of the

BCD 1995-23
-2-

Pioneer Railcorp

Board determines that Pioneer is not an employer under the Railroad

Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts as it is not

under common control with its rail carrier subsidiaries.

An appropriate Form G-215 is attached.

Glen L. Bower

opinion attached)

J&rome F. Kever
#### The People of the State of Illinois for use of Jacob Glos, Appellant, v. Peter B. Olsen, County Clerk et al., Appellees.

Gen. No. 19,370.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. S. C. Stotjgh, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 21, 1914.

Rehearing denied May 5, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by the People of the State of Illinois for the use of Jacob Grlos against Peter B. Olsen, county clerk of Cook county, and others to recover for an alleged breach of the official bond given by Olsen as county clerk. The declaration alleged sixty-nine breaches in as many counts. Judgment was entered in favor of defendant upon a general demurrer being sustained to plaintiff’s declaration. From the judgment, plaintiff appeals.

John R. O’Connor, for appellant Jacob Glos.

Carl R. Chindblom, William F. Struckmann & Frank L. Shepard for appellees Olsen, Chytraus and Severson.

Abstract of the Decision.

Official bonds, § *32*
      ***
      *—when declaration in suit on bond of county cleric demurrable.*In an action on a county clerk’s official bond, certain counts in the declaration alleged that the county clerk charged and collected excessive fees for the issuance of tax deeds and for recording the evidence upon which they were based, and the remaining counts were based on a claim that in each deed is*58sued on the affidavit required as a foundation therefor the county clerk included but a single parcel of land instead of several, thus causing an increased cost to the relator for record of the tax deeds. *Held*that assuming the action would lie on the bond for" such breaches, a general demurrer to the declaration was properly sustained for the reason that no one of the former counts alleged what amount or fee could legally have been required for recording such evidence, and for the reason that the allegations of the latter counts were hut mere conclusions, there being no allegations of fact from which the court could infer whether more than one lot should have been included in a tax deed or not.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Veis. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

*57Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Superior Oil
and Gas Co. (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30,
2005 (the "Report"),  I, Daniel Lloyd,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November 21, 2005

                                             /s/ Daniel Lloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Daniel Lloyd
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
# L_2019128EN.01004601.xml

| 16.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 128/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 128/46

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 145/2017

of 7 July 2017

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2019/752]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/548 of 23 March 2017 laying down a standard form for the written statement on the removal or breakage of a tachograph seal (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/548 of 23 March 2017 laying down a standard form for the written statement on the removal or breakage of a tachograph seal (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 21bb (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/799) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘21bc. | 32017 R 0548: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/548 of 23 March 2017 laying down a standard form for the written statement on the removal or breakage of a tachograph seal (OJ L 79, 24.3.2017, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘21bc.

32017 R 0548: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/548 of 23 March 2017 laying down a standard form for the written statement on the removal or breakage of a tachograph seal (OJ L 79, 24.3.2017, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/548 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2016 of 3 June 2016 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 79, 24.3.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 308, 23.11.2017, p. 27

2

---
#### § 875.102 Where do I send benefit claims?

You must submit your benefit claims to the FLTCIP Carrier.

[87 FR 68597, Nov. 16, 2022]
```

MANUFACTURING CONSUMER PRODUCTS IN UKRAINE 
by Carol Z. Logan

The size and strength of NIS consumer markets is leading many Western
manufacturers to shift from exporting to manufacturing there, in order to reduce
transportation and distribution costs, cut delivery times, and offer more
competitive prices to NIS consumers.  For example, Procter and Gamble is using
local contractors to produce detergent in St. Petersburg; Unilever is manufacturing
personal care products in Russia; and Baskin Robbins is building a $30 million ice
cream plant in Moscow.  One of the first U.S. consumer products companies to
begin manufacturing in the NIS is SC Johnson Wax, which began operations in
Ukraine in 1990, when it was still part of the Soviet Union.  Today, the company's
Ukrainian subsidiary, SC Johnson Kiev, sources ingredients, manufactures, and
distributes a growing range of home-care products in Ukraine and elsewhere. 
SC Johnson Kiev makes and sells many home care products in Ukraine and
elsewhere in the NIS market.  It also imports and sells familiar Johnson aerosol
products that are manufactured at other Johnson locations.  Ukraine is SC Johnson
Kiev's chief market, although the company also supplies Johnson subsidiaries in
Russia and elsewhere in Europe.  Products that are currently manufactured and/or
marketed in Ukraine by SC Johnson Kiev include: air fresheners, polishes and
waxes, insect control products, cleaners, and a variety of others. 

SC Johnson Kiev faces the same distribution challenges as other consumer
products companies doing business in the NIS.  To distribute its products, the
company is building a strong distribution network, based on its own sales force,
and regional and national wholesalers.  General Manager Franck Benhamou is
optimistic about the future of the market.  "Ukraine has a large, well-educated
population and as purchasing power increases, more people will be able to afford
our products," he said.

A corporate tradition of innovation and concern for the environment also serve this
U.S. manufacturer well in Ukraine.  Sawdust from Kiev furniture factories, for
example, that would otherwise go to waste  is used to manufacture "Fauch"
firelighter briquettes.  "The neighboring furniture factories didn't know what to do
with the sawdust they were producing, and now they are earning money for the
waste," according to Benhamou.  "The sawdust is being recycled into a
high-quality product made without formaldehyde or kerosene, and we are earning
hard currency from our export sales."
 
As for SC Johnson Kiev's over-all business goals, Benhamou's answer is realistic. 
"The situation could always be better, but I believe that the corporation is satisfied
with the results obtained so far.  We are meeting our objectives of building strong
brands for the future and being profitable."

Carol Z. Logan, an occasional contributor to BISNIS Bulletin, works for the United
States Information Agency.
```