alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1985 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1985

  To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage 
amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located 
                          in high-cost areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

    Mr. Gary G. Miller of California (for himself and Mr. Frank of 
Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage 
amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located 
                          in high-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Multifamily Loan Limit 
Adjustment Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. MAXIMUM MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMIT FOR MULTIFAMILY HOUSING IN HIGH-
              COST AREAS.

    In the National Housing Act, sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 
220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 
231(c)(2)(B), and 234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 
1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 
1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B)), and 1715y(e)(3)(B)) are each 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``110 percent'' and inserting ``170 
        percent''; and
            (2) by striking ``and by not to exceed 140 percent where 
        the Secretary determines it necessary on a project-by-project 
        basis''.
                                 <all>
```
### §140502. Principles and purposes

(a) Principles.—The principles underlying the corporation are patriotic allegiance to the United States, fidelity to the Constitution and laws of the United States, the security of civil liberty, and the permanence of free institutions.

(b) Purposes.—The purposes of the corporation are educational, fraternal, historical, and patriotic, perpetuating the principles of liberty and justice which have created the United States, by—

(1) commemorating all national patriotic holidays;

(2) maintaining true allegiance to the Government of the United States and fidelity to its Constitution and laws;

(3) preserving and strengthening comradeship and patriotism among its members;

(4) assisting, comforting, and aiding all needy and distressed members and their dependents;

(5) giving needed hospital and service work through its Department of Veterans Affairs certified service officers;

(6) cooperating with other civic and patriotic organizations having worthy objectives;

(7) keeping alive the achievements and memory of our country's founders;

(8) ever cherishing the memory of General George Washington, who founded the Purple Heart at his headquarters at Newburgh-on-the-Hudson on August 7, 1782;

(9) influencing and teaching our citizenry, in a loyal appreciation of the heritages of American citizenship, with its responsibilities and privileges; and

(10) preserving and defending the United States from all enemies.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1381.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140502 | 36:823. | Aug. 26, 1958, Pub. L. 85–761, §3, 72 Stat. 856; June 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–54, §13(n)(3), 105 Stat. 278. |

Section

In this section, the words "of America" are omitted for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (b)(3), the word "among" is substituted for "amongst" to use more common terminology.

In subsection (b)(10), the word "whomsoever" is omitted as unnecessary.
#### Ruth W. Perry, Respondent-Appellant, v. Marsden J. Perry, Appellant-Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
# L_2022175EN.01004101.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 24/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1072]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 of 5 August 2021 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council in order to take into account the evolution of the mass of new passenger cars registered in 2017, 2018 and 2019 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 of 5 August 2021 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council in order to take into account the evolution of the mass of new passenger cars registered in 2017, 2018 and 2019 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | By virtue of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 168/2020 of 23 October 2020 (2), Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 does not apply to Liechtenstein. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By virtue of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 168/2020 of 23 October 2020 (2), Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 does not apply to Liechtenstein.

| (3) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21az (Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32021 R 1961: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 of 5 August 2021 (OJ L 400, 12.11.2021, p. 14).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32021 R 1961: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 of 5 August 2021 (OJ L 400, 12.11.2021, p. 14).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1961 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 400, 12.11.2021, p. 14.

1

(2)  Not yet published in the Official Journal.

2

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Certificate of Compliance No. 1014 Amendment No. 6 Issuance.

Accession Number: ML092300151

Date Released: Monday, August 24, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML092300169 - 08/17/2009, T.Morin, Holtec International, Letter Re: Amendment No. 6 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1014 for the Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System. (2 page(s), 8/17/2009)
    - ML092300197 - Certificate of Compliance No. 1014, Amendment 6; Docket No. 72-1014; TAC No. L24208. (5 page(s), 8/17/2009)
    - ML092300202 - Appendix A of CoC 1014 Amendment 6. (1 page(s), 8/17/2009)
    - ML092300206 - Appendix B of CoC 1014 Amendment 6. (9 page(s), 8/17/2009)
    - ML092300207 - Safety Evaluation Report for CoC 1014 Amendment 6. (10 page(s), 8/17/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Superior Oil and
Gas Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Daniel  Lloyd,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 18, 2005
                                                          /s/ Daniel Lloyd
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Daniel Lloyd
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
B.C.D. 15-25

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

TransDistribution Ridgeland Railroad Company (TDRR)

October 6, 2015

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

TransDistribution Ridgeland Railroad Company (TDRR) as an employer under the 

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seep). The status of TDRR under the Acts has not 

previously been considered.

TDRR is a subsidiary corporation of TransDistribution, Inc, (TDI). TDI has never been

found to be an employer under the Acts. David C. Dillon of Dillon & Nash, Ltd., counsel 

for TDRR, provided information regarding the formation and start of operations for

TDRR. Mr. Dillon stated that TDRR began operations on January 1,2015, and hired two

employees who began compensated service to TDRR on January 2, 2015. However, these 

employees were being paid through the payroll of Sweetener Supply Corporation because

TDRR has been unable to obtain a Federal Employer Identification Number from the

Internal Revenue Service.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 35891, TDRR filed a Verified

Notice of Exception to operate along 1,230 linear feet of rail line within the Berwyn 

Transload Facility in Berwyn, Illinois. There are no mileposts or mile markers on the

line. TDRR indicated in that filing that the rail line is owned by the BNSF Railway 

Company (BA# 1621) and has been leased to Sweetener Supply Corporation for the

transloading of bagged sugar products. BNSF Railway Company is a Class I rail carrier

and a covered employer under the Acts with service creditable from March 3, 1970.

TDRR also stated that the line would be used to interchange with BNSF, and that its

projected annual revenues would not exceed $5 million. The Surface Transportation

Board granted TDRR’s request for exemption effective January 17, 2015.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface 

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49, United States Code.

Section 1 of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. § 351) contains essentially the same definition, as does

section 3231 ofthe Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C.§ 3231).

BA # 4798
2

The evidence of record establishes that TDRR is a rail carrier operating in interstate

commerce. Accordingly, the Board finds that TransDistribution Ridgeland Railroad 

Company became an employer within the meaning of section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad

Retirement Act and Section 1 of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective 

January 1,2015, the date on which TDRR began operations.

FOR THE BOARD

Martha P. Rico

Secretary to the Board
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH MARIDON, SR. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0116 (Civil Penalty Action)



### ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING**~** .

Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin has transferred to the Food and Drug Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. Any dates set for hearing orprehearing conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect absent further order. 

### SO ORDERED.

Attachment-Service ListDocketNo. FAA-2014-0116 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1
JosephMaridon, Sr., 

### Re5pondenl 9212 E. Frederick Ave Spokane, WA 99206-4303 ONE COPY

Joseph 

### R. Maridon, Jr., 

### Respondent's Counsel Attorney at Law 6130 Elton Ave Las Vegas, NV 89107
David F. Shayne, 

### Complainant 's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2165 FAX: 425-227-1007 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,

### Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 Walter

### L. Ayers, 

### Respondent's Counsel Attorney at Law 13435 North Whitehouse Court Spokane, WA 99208

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
# L_2021067EN.01006101.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/61

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 166/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2021/227]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/336 of 8 March 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/336 of 8 March 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21as (Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 0336: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/336 of 8 March 2018 (OJ L 70, 13.3.2018, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 0336: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/336 of 8 March 2018 (OJ L 70, 13.3.2018, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2018/336 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 70, 13.3.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §150414. Failure to comply with requirements

If the corporation fails to comply with any of the requirements of this chapter, including the requirement under section 150410 to maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation, the charter granted by this chapter shall expire.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 938.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7309

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARIO SORTO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-251-A, CA-99-854-AM) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 22, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mario Sorto, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Mario Sorto seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sorto , Nos. CR-96-251-A; CA-99-854-AM (E.D. Va. July 1 & Sept. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 831.908 Mandatory separation. ( a ) The mandatory separation provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8335(b) apply to all law enforcement officers and firefighters in primary and secondary positions. A mandatory separation under section 8335(b) is not an adverse action under part 752 of this chapter or a removal action under part 359 of this chapter. Section 831.502 provides the procedures for requesting an exemption from mandatory separation.
( b ) In the event an employee is separated mandatorily under 5 U.S.C. 8335(b), or is separated for optional retirement under 5 U.S.C. 8336(c), and OPM finds that all or part of the minimum service required for entitlement to immediate annuity was in a position which did not meet the requirements of a primary or secondary position and the conditions set forth in this subpart, such separation will be considered erroneous.
[58 FR 64367, Dec. 7, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 38524, July 25, 2001]
### §31111. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be distributed as provided by the board of directors, but in compliance with the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1329.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31111 | 36:705. | Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 976, §15, 70 Stat. 1056. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The words "outstanding" and "all Federal and State laws applicable thereto" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 900.601 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of these regulations is to implement provisions of title II of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, as amended, relating to Federally required merit personnel systems in State and local agencies, in a manner that recognizes fully the rights, powers, and responsibilities of State and local governments and encourages innovation and allows for diversity among State and local governments in the design, execution, and management of their systems of personnel administration, as provided by that Act.
( b ) Certain Federal grant programs require, as a condition of eligibility, that State and local agencies that receive grants establish merit personnel systems for their personnel engaged in administration of the grant-aided program. These merit personnel systems are in some cases required by specific Federal grant statutes and in other cases are required by regulations of the Federal grantor agencies. Title II of the Act gives the U.S. Office of Personnel Management authority to prescribe standards for these Federally required merit personnel systems.
# L_2019174EN.01005601.xml

| 27.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 174/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 174/56

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 185/2017

of 22 September 2017

amending Annex XV (State Aid) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1073]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1084 of 14 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 as regards aid for port and airport infrastructure, notification thresholds for aid for culture and heritage conservation and for aid for sport and multifunctional recreational infrastructures, and regional operating aid schemes for outermost regions and amending Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 as regards the calculation of eligible costs (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1084 of 14 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 as regards aid for port and airport infrastructure, notification thresholds for aid for culture and heritage conservation and for aid for sport and multifunctional recreational infrastructures, and regional operating aid schemes for outermost regions and amending Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 as regards the calculation of eligible costs (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 1j (Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014) of Annex XV to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32017 R 1084: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1084 of 14 June 2017 (OJ L 156, 20.6.2017, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32017 R 1084: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1084 of 14 June 2017 (OJ L 156, 20.6.2017, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/1084 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 23 September 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 22 September 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 20.6.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 919.405 May I enter into a covered transaction with a participant if a principal of the transaction is excluded?

As an agency official, you may not enter into a covered transaction with a participant if you know that a principal of the transaction is excluded, unless you obtain an exception under § 919.120.