65632 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / Notices 

Activity/Operator Location Date 

Vintage Petroleum, Inc., Structure Removal 

SEA ES/SR 04–137.

Main Pass, Block 125, Lease OCS–G 04913, located 20 miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.9/23/2004 

Maritech Resources, Inc., Structure Removal SEA ES/SR 04–136.East Cameron, Block 38, Lease OCS–G 02562, located 8 miles from the nearest 

Louisiana shoreline.

9/28/2004 

Maritech Resources, Inc., Structure Removal SEA ES/SR 04–135.Eugene Island, Block 28, Lease OCS–G 05478, located 12 miles from the nearest 

Louisiana shoreline.

9/28/2004 

ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Structure Removal SEA ES/SR 04–134.High Island (East South), Block A354, Lease OCS–G 17212, located 110 miles from 

the nearest Texas shoreline.

9/28/2004 

Veritas DGC, Inc., Geological & Geophysical Exploration Plan SEA L04–62.Located in the central Gulf of Mexico south of Fourchon, Louisiana ........................... 9/30/2004 

Persons interested in reviewing 

environmental documents for the 

proposals listed above or obtaining 

information about SEAs and FONSIs 

prepared for activities on the Gulf of 

Mexico OCS are encouraged to contact 

MMS at the address or telephone listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section.

Dated: October 7, 2004. 

Chris C. Oynes, 

Regional Director, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.

[FR Doc. 04–25242 Filed 11–12–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation 

and Enforcement 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement.

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation 

and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing 

that the information collection request 

for its Technical Evaluation customer 

surveys has been forwarded to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and comment. The 

information collection request describes 

the nature of the information collection 

and the expected burden and cost. The 

OMB control number for this collection 

of information is 1029–0114 and is on 

the forms along with the expiration 

date.

DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to 

approve or disapprove the information 

collections but may respond after 30 

days. Therefore, public comments 

should be submitted to OMB by 

December 15, 2004, in order to be 

assured of consideration.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request a copy of the information 

collection request, explanatory 

information and related form, contact 

John A. Trelease at (202) 208–2783, or 

electronically to jtreleas@osmre.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, which 

implement provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), 

require that interested members of the 

public and affected agencies have an 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection and recordkeeping activities 

(see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). OSM has 

submitted a request to OMB to renew its 

approval of the collection of information 

contained in a series of technical 

evaluation customer surveys. OSM is 

requesting a 3-year term of approval for 

the information collection activity. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The OMB control 

number for this collection of 

information is 1029–0114. 

As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a 

Federal Register notice soliciting 

comments on this collection of 

information was published on June 24, 

2204 (69 FR 35391). No comments were 

received. This notice provides the 

public with an additional 30 days in 

which to comment on the following 

information collection activity: 

Title: Technical Evaluations Series. 

OMB Control Number: 1029–0114. 

Summary: The series of surveys are 

needed to ensure that technical 

assistance activities, technology transfer 

activities and technical forums are 

useful for those who participate or 

receive the assistance. Specifically, 

representatives from State and tribal 

regulatory and reclamation authorities, 

representatives of industry, 

environmental or citizen groups, or the 

public, are the recipients of the 

assistance or participants in these 

forums. These surveys will be the 

primary means through which OSM 

evaluates its performance in meeting the 

performance goals outlined in its annual 

plans developed pursuant to the 

Government Performance and Results 

Act. 

Bureau Form Number: None. 

Frequency of Collection: Once. 

Description of Respondents: 26 State 

and tribal governments, industry 

organizations and individuals who 

request information or assistance. 

Total Annual Responses: 300. 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 25. 

Send comments on the need for the 

collection of information for the 

performance of the functions of the 

agency; the accuracy of the agency’s 

burden estimates; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility and clarity of the 

information collection; and ways to 

minimize the information collection 

burden on respondents, such as use of 

automated means of collection of the 

information, to the following address. 

Please refer to the appropriate OMB 

control number in all correspondence.

ADDRESSES: Please send comments to 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, Attention: Department of 

Interior Desk Officer, electronically to 

OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov, or via 

facsmile at (202) 395–6566. Also, please 

send a copy of your comments to John 

A. Trelease, Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 

Constitution Ave, NW., Room 210–SIB, 

Washington, DC 20240, or electronically 

to jtreleas@osmre.gov.

Dated: September 7, 2004. 

Sarah E. Donnelly, 

Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.

[FR Doc. 04–25319 Filed 11–12–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1070 (Final)] 

Certain Tissue Paper Products and 

Crepe Paper Products From China

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject 

investigation. 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / Notices 65633

1Petitioners are Seaman Paper Company of 

Massachusetts, Inc.; American Crepe Corp.; Eagle 

Tissue LLC; Flower City Tissue Mills Co.; Garlock 

Printing & Converting, Inc.; Paper Service Ltd.; 

Putney Paper Co., Ltd.; and the Paper, AlliedIndustrial, Chemical and Energy Workers 

International Union AFL–CIO, CLC.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 5, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Forstall ((202) 205–3443), Office of 

Industries, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 

(202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 4, 2004, the Commission issued 

a schedule for the conduct of the final 

phase of the subject investigation (69 FR 

60423, October 8, 2004). Subsequently, 

counsel on behalf of petitioners in this 

investigation 1 requested that the 

Commission extend the deadline for 

filing posthearing briefs on issues 

related to tissue paper (also applicable 

to the deadline for the submission of a 

written statement of information on 

issues related to tissue paper by any 

person who has not entered an 

appearance as a party to the 

investigation) by one week or more 

(letter from Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC 

to Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary, October 

21, 2004). Upon consideration of the 

reasons stated for the request, including 

an overlapping deadline with a related 

filing on crepe paper from China, the 

Commission is revising its schedule to 

extend the deadline for filing 

posthearing briefs and written 

statements by non-parties on issues 

related to tissue paper from January 5, 

2005, to January 12, 2005.

For further information concerning 

this investigation see the Commission’s 

notice cited above and the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

Authority: This investigation is being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: November 8, 2004. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04–25255 Filed 11–12–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division 

United States v. Cingular Wireless 

Corporation, SBC Communications 

Inc., BellSouth Corporation, and AT&T 

Wireless Services, Inc.; Competitive 

Impact Statement, Proposed Final 

Judgment, Complaint, Preservation of 

Assets Stipulation and Order 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a Complaint, 

proposed Final Judgment, Preservation 

of Assets Stipulation and Order, and 

Competitive Impact Statement have 

been filed with the U.S. District Court 

for the District of Columbia in United 

States v. Cingular Wireless Corps., Civil 

Case No. 1:04CV01850 (RBW). On 

October 25, 2004, the United States, 

along with the Attorneys General from 

the states of Connecticut and Texas, 

filed a complaint alleging that the 

proposed acquisition of AT&T Wireless 

Services, Inc. (‘‘AT&T Wireless’’) by 

Cingular Wireless Corp. (‘‘Cingular’’), 

which is jointly owned by BellSouth 

Corporation (‘‘BellSouth’’) and SBC 

Communications, Inc. (‘‘SBC’’), would 

violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 

U.S.C. 18, by substantially lessening 

competition in the provision of mobile 

wireless telecommunications services 

and mobile wireless broadband services. 

The proposed Final Judgment, filed at 

the same time as the Complaint and 

Preservation of Assets Stipulation and 

Order, requires Cingular to divest assets 

in eleven states—Connecticut, Georgia, 

Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, 

Massachusetts, Missouri, Michigan, 

Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas—in 

order to proceed with Cingular 

Wireless’s $41 billion cash acquisition 

of AT&T Wireless. A Competitive 

Impact Statement filed by the United 

States on October 29, 2004 describes the 

Complaint, the proposed Final 

Judgment, the industry, and the 

remedies available to private litigants 

who may have been injured by the 

alleged violation. 

Copies of the Complaint, proposed 

Final Judgment, Preservation of Assets 

Stipulation and Order, the Competitive 

Impact Statement, and all further papers 

filed with the Court in connection with 

the Complaint will be available for 

inspection at the Antitrust Documents 

Group, Antitrust Division, Liberty Place 

Building, Room 215, 325 7th Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20530 (202–514–

2481), and at the Office of the Clerk of 

the U.S. District Court for the District of 

Columbia. Copies of these materials may 

be obtained from the Antitrust Division 

upon request and payment of the 

copying fee set by Department of Justice 

regulations. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments in writing regarding the 

proposed consent decree to the United 

States. Such comments must be received 

by the Antitrust Division within sixty 

(60) days and will be filed with the 

Court by the United States. Comments 

should be addressed to Nancy 

Goodman, Chief, Telecommunications & 

Media Enforcement Section, Antitrust 

Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 

1401 H Street, NW., Suite 8000, 

Washington, DC 20530 (202–514–5621). 

At the conclusion of the sixty (60) day 

comment period. The U.S. District Court 

for the District of Columbia may enter 

the proposed consent decree upon 

finding that it serves the public interest.

J. Robert Kramer II, 

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

In the United States District Court for 

the District of Columbia 

United State of America, State of 

Connecticut and State of Texas, 

Plaintiffs, v. Cingular Wireless 

Corporation, SBC Communications Inc., 

Bellsouth Corporation and AT&T 

Wireless Services, Inc., Defendants; 

Competitive Impact Statement 

Civil No. 1:04CV01850 (RBW). 

Filed: October 29, 2004.

Plaintiff United States of America 

(‘‘United States’’), pursuant to Section 

2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures and 

Penalties Act (‘‘APPA’’ or ‘‘Tunney 

Act’’), 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h), files this 

Competitive Impact Statement relating 

to the proposed Final Judgment 

submitted for entry in this civil antitrust 

proceeding. 

I. Nature and Purpose of the Proceeding 

Defendants Cingular Wireless 

Corporation (‘‘Cingular’’), SBC 

Communications Inc. (‘‘SBC’’), 

BellSouth Corporation (‘‘BellSouth’’), 

and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. 

(‘‘AT&T Wireless Services’’) entered 

into an Agreement and Plan of Merger 

dated February 17, 2004, pursuant to 

which Cingular will acquire AT&T 

Wireless. Plaintiff United States and the 

states of Connecticut and Texas 

(‘‘plaintiff states’’) filed a civil antitrust 

Complaint on October 25, 2004, seeking 

to enjoin the proposed acquisition. The