alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1935

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing loan benefits 

for the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. QUINN, Mr. SERRANO, Mrs. MCCARTHY of 

New York, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. OWENS, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

SANDERS, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mrs. JONES

of Ohio, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, 

Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GILLMOR, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. BISHOP

of Georgia, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. FROST, and Mr. WYNN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing 

loan benefits for the purchase of residential cooperative 

apartment units.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Housing 

5 Fairness Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1935 IH 

1 SEC. 2. RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS. 

2 (a) HOUSING BENEFITS FOR COOPERATIVE APART3 MENT UNITS.—Section 3710(a) of title 38, United States 

4 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(12) To purchase stock or membership in a 

7 development, project or structure of a cooperative 

8 housing corporation in accordance with subsection 

9 (h).’’. 

10 (b) CONDITIONS OF HOUSING BENEFITS FOR COOP11 ERATIVE APARTMENT UNITS.—Section 3710 of such title 

12 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(h)(1) A loan may not be guaranteed under sub15 section (a)(12) unless the following conditions are met: 

16 ‘‘(A) The development, project or structure of 

17 the cooperative housing corporation complies with 

18 such criteria as the Secretary prescribes in regula19 tions. 

20 ‘‘(B) The dwelling unit, that the purchase of 

21 stock or membership in the development, project or 

22 structure of the cooperative housing corporation en23 titles the purchaser to occupy, is a one-family resi24 dential unit. 

25 ‘‘(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term 

26 ‘cooperative housing corporation’ has the same meaning 
3

•HR 1935 IH 

1 given such term by section 216(b)(1) of the Internal Rev2 enue Code of 1986. 

3 ‘‘(3) For the purposes of applying the term ‘value of 

4 the property’ to a loan guaranteed under subsection 

5 (a)(12), such term means the appraised value of the stock 

6 or membership entitling the purchaser to the permanent 

7 occupancy of the dwelling unit in the development, project 

8 or structure of the cooperative housing corporation.’’.

Æ
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7068

EDGAR L. KNIGHT,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secret ary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

William F. Fox, Jr. , Purcell & Fox, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for claimantappellant. Of counsel was Robert W. Legg , Law Office of Robert W. Legg, of Arlington,

Virginia.

John J. Todor , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigat ion Branch, Civil Division, United

States Department of Justic e, of Washington, DC, ar gued for respondent-appellee.

With him on the brief were Gregory G. Katsas , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E.

Davidson , Director, and Martin F. Hockey, Jr. , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the

brief were Michael J. Timinski , Deputy Assistant G eneral Counsel, and Y. Ken Lee

, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs,

of Washington, DC.

Appeal from: United States Cour t of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Judge William A. MoormanNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7068

EDGAR L. KNIGHT,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secret ary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States C ourt of Appeals for Veterans Claims

in CASE NO(S). 06-0151

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED November 25, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
#### HYUNDAI ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. and Hyundai Electronics America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Micron Technology, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor.

Slip Op. 06-46.

Court No. 00-01-00027.

United States Court of International Trade.

April 5, 2006.

*JUDGMENT ORDER*

GOLDBERG, Senior Judge.

Upon consideration of the United States Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand (“Redetermination Results”) filed pursuant to the Court’s decision in *Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States,*414 F.Supp.2d 1289, 30 CIT-(CIT 2006); and upon consideration *of the*fact that no parties have filed negative comments regarding the Redetermination Results; and upon consideration of all other papers filed herein; and upon due deliberation, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination Results are sustained in all respects.

SO ORDERED.
|  |
|--|
| Home |  Advanced Search |  Directory |  Site Map |  Privacy Policy |  Accessibility |  Contact Us                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| About  Our Work  Career Opportunities  Business With Us  Information Resources  Outreach |
|  

LIBRARY

VOLPE JOURNAL

HIGHLIGHTS

PUBLISHED AND PRESENTED

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

TRANSPORTATIONSTRATEGIC PLANS

LINKS                  |  

National Science and Technology Council
Partnership to Promote Enhanced Freight Movement at International Border Gateways:A Strategic Plan
**February 2000**
Table of Contents
Executive Summary

OpportunitiesImplementation
- Introduction
Vision, Goals, Outcomes, and PartnersOutcome GoalsScope of EffortsThe Federal RoleTechnology DeploymentTechnology Delivery
- Opportunities and Challenges
OpportunitiesChallenges
- Investment Strategies
Outcome Goal 1: Improved Facility CapacityOutcome Goal 2: Improved Intermodal Access at Border FacilitiesOutcome Goal 3: Improved Intermodal ConnectivityOutcome Goal 4: Enhanced US Competitive Position
- Implementation
Technology DevelopmentTechnology Deployment SupportTechnology Delivery and Outreach
Appendix ACase Studies  Appendix BAcronyms
Return to Top
About the National Science and Technology Council
President Clinton established the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) by Executive Order on November 23, 1993. This cabinet-level council is the principal means for the President to coordinate science, space, and technology policies across the Federal Government. NSTC acts as a "virtual" agency for science and technology (S&T;). The President chairs the NSTC. Membership consists of the Vice President, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, Cabinet Secretaries and Agency Heads with significant science and technology responsibilities, and other White House officials.

Through the NSTC, Federal departments and agencies work cooperatively to ensure that Federal science and technology investments support national goals. NSTC Committees prepare R&D; strategies that are coordinated across the Federal government to form a comprehensive investment package.

Call 202-456-6100 to obtain additional information regarding the NSTC.

 

Prepared byUnited States Department of TransportationResearch and Special Programs AdministrationJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems CenterTransportation Strategic Planning and Analysis Office55 BroadwayCambridge, Massachusetts 021432

Return to Top |

 
|   U.S. Department of Transportation | Research and Special Programs Administration  |   |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
### §985a. Cancellation of bonds issued under section 985

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any bond issued under section 985 of this title, is hereby canceled together with the obligation to pay such bond.

(Pub. L. 97–369, title III, §311, Dec. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1782.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1983, and not as part of act May 13, 1954, ch. 201, 68 Stat. 903, which comprises this chapter.

Section consists of a part of section 311 of Pub. L. 97–369. The remainder of section 311 of Pub. L. 97–369 amended sections 984 and 988 of this title.
# L_2020012EN.01000201.xml

| 16.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 12/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 12/2

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Moldova on certain aspects of air services, signed in Luxembourg on 11 April 2006, entered into force on 25 February 2008, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 25 February 2008.

---
The HONORABLE RICHARD H. KYL E, United States District Judge for the 1 District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. The Honorab le James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern 2 District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1093

___________ Ezekiel L. Lofton, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Stant Manufacturing, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 10, 1998 Filed: July 2, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and KYLE, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM. Ezekiel L. Lofton appeals from the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter 2 of law to Stant Manufacturin g, Inc. on his claim that his employer unlawfully retaliated against him for filing an employment discrimination charge in violation of Title VII, 42-2-

U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. See Kim v. Nash Finch Co. , 123 F .3d 1046, 106 0 (8th Cir. 1997) (detailing elements of retaliation claim under both statutes)
. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude th at the judgment of the district court was correct. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
49



Exhibit 32.1
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004 of Andresmin Gold Corporation, a Montana corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Ian Brodie, President, Chief Executive Officer
and principal financial officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: September 27, 2004                                  /s/ Ian Brodie
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Ian Brodie, President, CEO and
                                                  principal financial officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15845 and #15846; VIRGINIA Disaster Number VA-00079]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of VIRGINIA (FEMA-4411-DR), dated 12/18/2018. *Incident:*
                         Tropical Storm Michael. *Incident Period:*
                         10/09/2018 through 10/16/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 12/18/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/19/2019. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/18/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 12/18/2018, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Amelia, Appomattox, Brunswick, Campbell, Charlotte, Chesterfield, Cumberland, Danville 
                    ( print page 95)
                    City, Dinwiddie, Essex, Floyd, Fluvanna, Franklin, Galax City, Halifax, King and Queen, Lunenburg, Montgomery, New Kent, Northumberland, Nottoway, Pittsylvania, Powhatan, Prince Edward, Rappahannock, Richmond, Roanoke. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 158458 and for economic injury is 158460. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2019-00015 Filed 1-7-19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Kodiak
Energy, Inc.
 
 EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 30, 2009
 /s/
William S. Tighe
 Name:
William S. Tighe
 Title:
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2072 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2072

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
    penalty in the computation of the income tax on Social Security 
                               benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 13, 2003

Mr. Foley (for himself, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Paul, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, 
   Mr. Bachus, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Istook, Mr. Ney, Mr. English, Mr. 
    Platts, Mr. McHugh, Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico, Mr. Souder, Mr. 
 Nethercutt, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Hayworth, and Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite 
 of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 
    penalty in the computation of the income tax on social security 
                               benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Marriage Penalty 
Elimination Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN COMPUTATION OF INCOME TAX ON 
              SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 86 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Base Amount and Adjusted Base Amount.--For purposes of this 
section--
            ``(1) Base amount.--The term `base amount' means--
                    ``(A) $50,000 in the case of a joint return, and
                    ``(B) $25,000 in any other case.
            ``(2) Adjusted base amount.--The term `adjusted base 
        amount' means--
                    ``(A) $68,000 in the case of a joint return, and
                    ``(B) $34,000 in any other case.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly  Report of Manchester
Inc. (the  "Registrant")  on Form  10-QSB/A for the period  ending  February 28,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Richard D. Gaines, Acting Principal Executive
Officer of the  Registrant,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to ss.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to his
knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


Date:  April 20, 2006            By:  /s/ Richard D. Gaines
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Richard D. Gaines
                                      Title: Acting Principal Executive Officer,
                                             Secretary and Director
Gibbons 

Douglas 

discretion to determine whether a writ will be considered, See Smith v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991), 

and because petitioners have failed to submit the information necessary 

for us to do so, NRAP 21(a)(4), we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge 

Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas 

Ramzy P. Ladah 

Patrick K. McKnight 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

111LEMENZIM GEGNIE
# L_2021389EN.01000101.xml

| 4.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 389/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 389/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Korea on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 25 June 2020, entered into force on 1 November 2021, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 5 October 2021.

---