Issue Date: 08/05/09 1 65001.13 

ATTACHMENT 65001.13

INSPECTION OF ITAAC-RELATED INSTALLATION OF 

LOAD HANDLING EQUIPMENT AND FUEL RACKS 

PROGRAM APPLICABILITY: 2503 

65001.13-01 INSPECTION OBJECTIVES 

01.01 To determine whether installation activities of both New Fuel Storage Racks (NFR) 

and Spent Fuel Storage Racks (SFR) are in accordance with the Design Control Document 

(DCD), Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), industry code requirements, owner and 

vendor approved procedures, and regulatory requirements. 

01.02 To determine whether installation of Refueling Light Load Handling and Overhead 

Heavy Load Handling Equipment is in accordance with the FSAR, DCD, industry code 

requirements, owner and vendor approved procedures, and regulatory requirements. 

01.03 To determine whether post installation activities are being performed according to 

applicable instructions and quality assurance requirements. 

01.04 To determine whether Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria 

(ITAAC) related activities are being conducted in accordance with established procedures 

and test acceptance criteria have been met. 

01.05 To evaluate the adequacy of the implementation of the specific Quality Assurance 

(QA) program requirements related to installation activities including the identification, 

resolution, tracking and trending of problems within the corrective action program. 

65001.13-02 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDANCE 

For purposes of this procedure, load-handling equipment and fuel racks may include the 

following components. 

a. Fuel Racks 

1. New Fuel Dry Storage Racks consist of the supported racks that will contain 

the new reactor fuel in dry storage within the new fuel storage area. 

2 Spent Fuel Storage Racks consist of the supported racks that will contain the 

new fuel until placed in the reactor and the spent reactor fuel under water 

within the Spent Fuel Pool. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 2 65001.13 

b. Load Handling Equipment 

1. Light Load Handling Equipment (Related to Refueling) includes the fuel 

handling and refueling system which consist of equipment and structures 

used for conducting refueling operations. 

2. Overhead Heavy Load Handling Systems consist of equipment which lift 

loads whose weight is greater than the combined weight of a single spent 

fuel assembly and its handling device. This equipment would be used for 

activities such as reactor disassembly, spent fuel cask handling, and 

movement of critical parts of the reactor or support components. These 

cranes are generally safety related and seismically qualified and remain in 

the vicinity of the reactor or refuel floor. For example, the AP1000 Heavy 

Load Handling Systems include the following: Containment Polar Crane, 

Equipment Hatch Hoist, Maintenance Hatch Hoist, Spent Fuel Shipping Cask 

Crane, Main Steam Isolation Valve (MSIV) Monorail Hoists. 

02.01 Fuel Rack Installation. Select a sample of installation activities for both NFR and 

SFR described above. Through direct inspection, confirm that both the general QA 

attributes described in section 01.05 and the following attributes, as applicable, have been 

met: 

a. NFR and SFR are fabricated using the proper material (base metal and neutron 

absorbing material) as described in the design documents and manufacturer=s 

specifications. 

b. NFR and SFR are properly supported and/or restrained so as to comply with 

appropriate seismic classification specified in the design documents. 

c. Installation requirements have been met such as: proper location, orientation, 

alignment, spacing, placement, dimensions, tolerances, and quantity. 

d. A seismic stress analysis for the safe shutdown earthquake and a stress analysis 

for the fuel rack design loads should be complete and have been reviewed and 

approved by the licensee prior to installation. 

e. Utilization of specially trained and qualified personnel and equipment where 

required to meet manufacturers= instructions. 

f. Appropriate drawings and work procedures are available to installation personnel. 

Installation requirements, construction drawings, specifications, and work 

procedures are of the latest approved revision. 

g. Proper QA controls are implemented for installation activities in accordance with 

program procedures and regulatory requirements. 

General Guidance. This inspection should be performed on a sampling basis during 

component installation activities and will conclude when the licensee’s final acceptance 

tests are completed. Field observations can include independent 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 3 65001.13 

measurement/observation or observation of licensee/contractor inspections. While all 

applicable attributes do not need to be reviewed for each sample, the majority should be 

reviewed and samples/attributes reviewed should include all facets of installation activities 

including backshift activities. Generally, Fuel Storage and Handling is addressed in 

Chapter 9, Auxiliary Systems, of the FSAR. If welding is performed within the scope of fuel 

rack installation, refer to inspection procedure 65001.B for additional guidance. (Applicable 

welding codes may be found in the FSAR) 

Specific Guidance. 

a. Reference the applicable FSAR and licensee purchase / design and installation 

specifications. 

b. As an example, for the AP1000, the NFRs rest on the floor, but lateral supports are 

attached to New Fuel Pit. SFRs are free standing and not anchored to the floor nor 

the spent fuel pool wall. 

c. Rack installation should not distort the rack geometry or have any detrimental 

impact on rack mechanical integrity (over stress, exposure to contamination, etc). 

Handling and rigging of the racks should be carefully planned and effectively 

implemented. Installation rigging points on the racks should be inspected for 

localized damage. Dimensional and visual checks should be made to assure no 

distortion prior to and post installation. Distortion could impact a smooth fuel 

assembly fit into the racks. Dummy fuel assembly loading into all/random rack 

storage areas should be used to identify any anomalies or non-conforming 

conditions. The racks should comply with the installation requirements including 

dimensional clearances and leveling criteria. 

Confirm that precautions are included in work instructions to prevent rack damage 

during storage/installation and are adhered to. For example, prior to installation 

lifts, pre-job briefs should take place, and rigging equipment should be inspected 

per both site administrative controls and appropriate ANSI standards. Spread lift 

rigs should be utilized as recommended by the vendor 

Post-installation conditions should periodically be observed throughout the 

construction period to assure components are properly protected and maintained 

until final turnover. 

d. Both NFRs and SFRs shall have a vendor provided confirmatory dynamic and 

stress analysis. The licensee shall have reviewed and accepted these analyses 

and installation instructions shall assure installation meets the design that was 

analyzed. The racks shall also have a Seismic Category 1 (Per RG-1.29) stress 

analysis that the licensee has reviewed and approved if completed by a vendor. 

The inspector should reference the DCD and FSAR for specific guidance. 

For seismic components, the inspector should pay particular attention to the 

traceability of material and equipment to prevent the use of incorrect or defective 

materials, parts, and components. The inspector should ensure that required 

identification of the item is maintained by part number, bolting grading, serial 

number, or other appropriate means, either on the item or on records traceable to 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 4 65001.13 

the item, and that any required markings are on the item. In the case of critical 

fasteners, compliance with the applicable material specification (e.g. purchase 

order and vendor identification) should be verified by required markings on bolts 

and nuts and certified material test reports or certificates of conformance as 

required by the applicable procurement drawings and specifications and/or by the 

applicable codes. In the case of vendor-supplied equipment assemblies containing 

fasteners, samples should be inspected to verify compliance with approved vendor 

drawings, design and code specifications, and other information. 

Field observations should include independent measurement/observation, or 

alternatively, observation of licensee/contractor inspections. While all applicable 

attributes do not need to be reviewed for each sample, the review should include 

all facets of installation activities. 

e. Review the manufacturer’s instructions for installation of the NFR and SFR. 

Determine if they specify that personnel with special training should be utilized for 

the installation. If so, determine if specially trained personnel are being utilized to 

meet the specification. 

f. Height of the SFRs relative to the anticipated pool water depth should be confirmed 

for required water coverage/protection. Water flow paths around the SFRs and the 

clearance between the pool walls and the rack shall be in accordance with 

installation requirements. The licensee’s analysis shall demonstrate the ability of 

cooling water to naturally circulate through the racks and provide adequate cooling 

to the spent fuel. If applicable, ensure that new fuel storage area floor drains are 

installed and free from obstruction and are protected from foreign material being 

trapped in the drain during installation. Ensure that if foreign material covers are 

installed they are then removed when the pit is put in service. 

g. Additional guidance for QA requirements are in section 65001.13-02.05. QA items 

that the inspector should pay particular attention to include the following: quality 

control hold points, quality of QA records, QA record management, and field 

changes are properly controlled. The inspector should review the licensee=s 

procurement packages for equipment inspected under this procedure. 

02.02 Refueling Light Load Handling and Overhead Heavy Load Handling Equipment 

Installation. Select a sample of installation activities for both the Light Load Handling 

Equipment and Overhead Heavy Load Handling Systems described above. Through direct 

inspection, confirm that both the general QA attributes described in section 01.05 and the 

following attributes, as applicable, have been met: 

a. Load handling equipment has been fabricated using the proper materials and 

techniques as described in the construction code and design documents. 

b. Crane installation is in accordance with design drawings, design specification, and 

licensee procedures. 

c. Crane maximum load is adequate for its use and has been analyzed by the 

licensee. If appropriate, review load limit set points for compliance to design 

requirements. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 5 65001.13 

d. Refueling equipment specified in the DCD and the FSAR meets purchase 

specifications and has been installed or stored in accordance with established site 

procedures. 

e. Verify that the crane meets the Single Failure Proof Guidelines stated in NUREG0554. 

f. Crane complies with seismic design criteria. 

g. Utilization of specially trained personnel and equipment where required to meet 

manufacturers= instructions. 

h. Installation requirements, construction drawings, specifications, and work 

procedures contain the latest revisions and are available to craft personnel. 

I. Proper QA controls are implemented for installation activities in accordance with 

program procedures and the licensee’s QA program requirements. 

j. Structural and/or fabrication welding is completed in accordance with applicable 

welding codes, standards, manufacturer’s installation requirements, qualified 

welding procedures and the licensee’s QA program requirements related to the 

control of special processes. 

General Guidance. This inspection should be performed as often as significant component 

installation activities are taking place. Field observations can include independent 

measurement/observation or observation of licensee/contractor inspections. While all 

applicable attributes do not need to be reviewed for each sample, the majority should be 

reviewed and samples/attributes reviewed should include all facets of installation activities. 

Generally, Load Handling Equipment is addressed in Chapter 9, Auxiliary Systems, of the 

FSAR. 

Specific Guidance. 

Light Load Handling Systems. 

a. The LLHS design shall conform to applicable requirements specified in ANS 57.1-

1992, “Design Requirements for Light Water Reactor Fuel Handling Systems.” 

b. Verify allowable crane movement has been analyzed by the licensee. For 

example, movement of the AP1000 New Fuel Jib Crane is positioned such that it 

cannot reach the spent fuel storage positions. Test movement and verification of 

limitations shall be conducted on all possible load paths. 

 Other installation requirements such as: coatings, orientation, alignment, 

dimensional tolerances, and other mounting requirements should be verified. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 6 65001.13 

 The rails for the fuel moving equipment should be checked for dimensional 

acceptability; the successful transport of fuel is in the alignment and smoothness of 

operation of the machine to rail interface. 

 Distance between rails and the level of the rail should be checked. The rails 

should be parallel along their length. Centerline distance between rails and the 

wheels of carts shall meet drawing tolerances. Lift cabling installation, installation 

requirements and method of attachment/adjustment are potential critical points for 

inspection. Hydraulic equipment should be checked for leak tightness and smooth 

operation. 

 Verify adequate precautions are taken to prevent damage during 

placement/mounting. For example, prior to installation lifts, pre-job briefs should 

take place, and rigging equipment should be inspected per site administrative 

controls and appropriate ANSI standards. Spread lift rigs should be utilized as 

recommended by the vendor and other documentation. 

 For additional electrical installation guidance, utilize IPs 65001.8 and .9. Power 

sources/supplies to components should be reliable. The breaker for the component 

should not have other intermittent, permanent, or temporary loads that can 

overload the supply breaker. 

c. If present for the reactor type, the jib crane has a maximum load rating. This crane 

as well as all cranes should be clearly marked with their maximum rating. The 

licensee shall verify that the crane is capable of this maximum load. The jib crane 

may get used as a general lift apparatus and its load limit can unintentionally be 

exceeded. Administrative controls should be used to limit the crane=s use. Fuel 

handling cranes and platforms typically have a maximum load rating. There shall 

be a vendor provided analysis on this topic. 

d. Fuel handling tools should be sampled for compliance with drawing dimensional 

tolerance. 

e. Review the DCD and FSAR to determine if the licensee is committed to follow 

NUREG-0554. If so, verify that the crane meets the Single Failure Proof 

Guidelines stated in NUREG-0554. 

f. A particular crane may be designed to Seismic Category 1 requirements as 

described in Regulatory Guide (RG) - 1.29. Some cranes may be designed to 

Seismic Category II (such as the Fuel Handling Jib Crane for the AP1000). 

g. Review the manufacturer’s instructions for installation and first operation of the 

cranes and light load handling equipment. Determine if they specify that personnel 

with special training should be utilized for the installation. If so, determine if 

specially trained personnel are being utilized to meet the specification. 

h. Installation requirements, construction drawings, specifications, and work 

procedures are of the latest approved revision. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 7 65001.13 

I. Additional guidance for QA requirements are in section 65001.13-02.05. QA items 

of particular interest include: verification of QC hold points, QA record quality and 

retention requirements, QA records management, and review of field changes to 

confirm that they do not deviate from the approved design. The inspector should 

review the licensee=s procurement packages for purchased equipment inspected 

under this inspection procedure. 

j. If welding is required for component installation, select a sample of welds for 

review. Through direct observations and/or record reviews, confirm the applicable 

attributes listed in IP 65001.B have been met. 

Inspectors performing this inspection should be familiar with the applicable industry code 

requirements such as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and 

Pressure Vessel Code Section IX, Welding and Brazing Qualifications. (NOTE: ASME 

Section IX is only a qualification code, the code requirements for fabrication using welding 

techniques are contained in the appropriate construction code, such as ASME Section III 

or ASME NOG-1). The inspector should also be familiar with the other requirements from 

the FSAR, DCD, other welding related design information, applicable process procedures, 

QA program requirements, and commitments. The inspector should be familiar with 

general welding practices and specific welding techniques. Additionally, the inspector 

should be competent in nondestructive testing techniques such as, visual examination, 

Magnetic Particle, Liquid Penetrant, Radiographic, and Ultrasonic. 

The selected samples should include sufficient variety to assure that various welding 

processes and material combinations are observed for each constructor performing ITAACrelated welding. This scope applies to both observations and record reviews. A variety of 

nondestructive examination processes should also be included. 

The inspector should consider efficiencies gained by performing this inspection along with 

other welding activities since these may be the same craft personnel, procedures, welders, 

etc. 

Records shall provide traceability of the welding activity such as weld procedures used, 

identification of welders, material certification, inspections performed and results, 

inspectors, and qualification records for procedures and personnel. These records shall be 

retained and stored in accordance with QA requirements. 

Overhead Heavy Load Handling Systems (OHLHS) 

Based on review of design specifications, industry codes, ITAAC requirements, drawings, 

engineering calculations, station procedures, and field observations, verify: 

a. The OHLHS is seismically qualified, where applicable, and that the as-installed 

equipment including anchorage is seismically bounded by the tested or analyzed 

conditions. 

b. The OHLHS meets one of three safety guidelines for load drops as described in 

Standard Review Plan 9.1.5, Overhead Heavy Load Handling System. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 8 65001.13 

c. Procedural controls have been established for the design, operation, testing, 

maintenance, and inspection of the OHLHS consistent with section 5.1.1 of 

NUREG-0612 and SRP 9.1.5. 

d. Load testing of the OHLHS cranes main and auxiliary hoists is satisfactory, meet 

applicable Code and ITAAC requirements, and bound the expected load weights. 

Pre-operational inspection and testing of overhead cranes is typically governed by 

ASME NOG-1. Tests shall include operational testing with 100 percent load to 

demonstrate function and speed controls for bridge, trolley, and hoist drives and 

proper functioning of limit switches, locking and safety devices. A rated load test is 

performed with a 125 percent load. 

e. Testing is completed satisfactorily to confirm that the uncontrolled lowering of a 

heavy load is prevented. Testing meets applicable Code and ITAAC requirements, 

and bounds the expected load weights. The crane braking subsystem should be 

clearly understood prior to testing. Dynamic and Emergency braking pretest shall 

verify proper operation prior to the application of loads. For highly reliable/single 

failure proof cranes, Section 8 of NUREG-0554 provides additional testing 

guidance. 

f. Programmatic controls are established and in place for the inspection and use of 

slings and special lifting devices. 

g. Crane rails shall be inspected for dimensional acceptability prior to setting the 

crane. Vendor rail installation instructions in the containment may require an 

understanding of rebar locations in the concrete matrix. Installation may have to be 

coordinated with containment welding inspections or roof closure. The rails should 

be circular and in a common plane within tolerance. 

h. Power sources/supplies to components should be reliable and should not have 

other intermittent permanent or temporary loads that can overload the supply 

breaker. For additional electrical installation guidance, utilize IP 65001.08 and IP 

65001.09. 

i. Crane movement paths are to be clearly prescribed. Exact locations relative to 

crane movement position must be established such that fuel, crane, and other 

equipment are not damaged. Interlock position detectors for crane movement 

limitations should be identified and mounted appropriately. Interlocks for load 

paths shall be tested. The cask handling crane shall be interlocked such that it 

cannot traverse over the spent fuel pool, new fuel pit, or fuel transfer canal 

j. Review appropriate references (below) for inspection details. 

02.03 Post Installation Activities. Select at least one component from each group of 

equipment for review (NFR, SFR, Load Handling Equipment), with emphasis on the more 

significant ITAAC-related components previously selected for Section 02.01 and 02.02. 

Confirm these components are properly protected and maintained considering the following 

attributes, as applicable: 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 9 65001.13 

a. Periodic inspections are being performed in accordance with established 

procedures. 

b. Protection is provided as required against adverse temperature, humidity, flooding, 

and foreign materials such as dirt, dust, and construction debris. 

c. Lubrication, rotation, and electrical resistance checks are being performed. 

d. Records are being maintained as to the status of installed components. 

e. Appropriate stamps, tags, markings, etc. are in use to prevent missing required 

inspections and tests, and the prevention of inadvertent operation. 

f. If applicable, ensure that new fuel storage area floor drains are free from 

obstruction and are protected from foreign material being trapped in the drain 

during installation, fabrication, and post installation. 

Guidance. Post-installation activities should be observed monthly throughout the 

construction period to assure components are properly maintained until final turnover. 

02.04 Testing and Verification. Select a sufficient number of component ITAAC-related 

testing activities to assure testing is conducted in accordance with established procedures 

and test acceptance criteria have been met. 

General Guidance. The inspector should review the FSAR, DCD and review the ITAAC 

that are associated with this inspection procedure. The inspector should determine what 

specific acceptance criteria are established and select those for observation that are best 

confirmed through direct observation. Others should be confirmed through record/data 

review although direct observation is the preferred method of inspection for most. 

This inspection should be coordinated with IP 65001.C, Construction Testing; IP 65001.D, 

Operational Testing; and MC 2504 guidance. Sample size will be dependant on guidance 

from those IPs and the size of the targeted ITAAC sets. 

Specific Guidance. 

a. NFR and SFR 

 As indicated in the installation section above, dummy (go/no-go) assembly trial 

insertions using the fuel handling equipment should be used to identify fuel rack 

installation problems. All interlocks associated with design minimum and maximum 

rack positions shall be tested in accordance with the applicable ITAAC. 

b. Light Load Handling Equipment (Refueling) 

1. The fuel handling equipment should have a visible maximum load rating. 

The vendor provided analysis on the adequacy of a particular load value 

shall be available for review. Load testing shall be completed per code 

requirements and in accordance with specific administrative procedures. 

Testing shall be completed prior to placing the equipment in service, and 

prior to any fuel handling. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 10 65001.13 

2. Cabling, electrical operation of components, and hydraulics should move 

smoothly during testing. Other components of the handling equipment such 

as upenders should not vibrate or bind during operation. 

Power sources/supplies to components should be reliable. The breaker for 

the component should not have other intermittent loads that can overload the 

supply breaker with the components in operation. With power removed from 

the component, the component should fail to a braked, non-moving position. 

 Pivot fasteners should not tend to loosen themselves while in operation. 

Interlock position detectors for fuel movement limits should be clearly 

identified and mounted appropriately. Trial movement of equipment should 

be accomplished on all load paths. 

c. Overhead Heavy Load Equipment 

1. ITAAC and FSAR should require specific load testing. Review those 

requirements prior to testing initiation. Preoperational inspection and 

testing of overhead cranes is typically governed by ASME NOG-1. Tests 

shall include operational testing with 100 percent load to demonstrate 

function and speed controls for bridge, trolley, and hoist drives and proper 

functioning of limit switches, locking and safety devices. A rated load test 

shall be performed with a 125 percent load. 

2. Crane movement paths are to be clearly prescribed. Exact locations 

relative to crane movement position must be established such that fuel, 

crane, other equipment are not damaged. 

The crane braking subsystem should be clearly understood prior to 

testing. The dynamic and emergency braking pretests shall confirm 

proper operation prior to the application of loads. Section 8 of NUREG0554 provides additional testing guidance. 

3. Interlock position detectors for crane movement limitations should be 

identified and mounted appropriately. Interlocks for all load paths shall be 

tested. 

Review appropriate references for cranes for other details of inspection (see 

below references). 

02.05 Quality Assurance Program (Corrective Action Program). Evaluate the adequacy of 

the implementation of the specific quality assurance program requirements related to 

installation of load handling equipment and fuel storage racks. Confirm that problems 

identified associated with installation of load handling equipment and fuel storage racks are 

entered into the licensee/constructor corrective action program in accordance with program 

requirements. The inspector may review licensee actions to address similar or related 

problems that were previously identified, in order to check the extent of condition and 

confirm the effectiveness of the licensee=s corrective measures. 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 11 65001.13 

Guidance: This inspection activity is to assure that problems are identified and entered 

into the applicable process to assure corrective actions appropriate to the circumstances 

are developed, prioritized, and implemented. Inspections of Quality Assurance Program 

implementation, effectiveness of Problem Identification and Resolution, and SelfAssessment will be performed under the MC 2504 process. 

65001.13-03 RESOURCE ESTIMATE 

The average resource expenditure for this inspection procedure is estimated to be 200 

hours per Unit. 

65001.13-04 REFERENCES 

IP 65001.B, Welding 

IP 65001.11, Containment Integrity 

IP 65001.C, Construction Testing 

IP 65001.D, Operational Testing 

NUREG-0554, Single-Failure-Proof Cranes for Nuclear Power Plants 

NUREG-0612, Control of Heavy Loads at Nuclear Power Plants (Microfiche location 

6411/280) 

RG 1.13, Spent Fuel Storage Facility Design Basis 

RG 1.29, Seismic Design Classification 

RG 1.54, Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to WaterCooled Nuclear Power Plants 

RG 1.84, Design and Fabrication Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III, Division 1 

RG 1.124, Service Limits and Loading Combinations for Class 1 Linear-Type Component 

Supports (Rev. 1, ML003739380) 

RG 1.130, Service Limits and Loading Combinations for Class 1 Plate-and-Shell-Type 

Component Supports (Rev. 1, ML003740123) 

ANS 57.1, Design Requirements for Light Water Reactor Fuel Handling Systems 

ANSI N210-76, Design Requirements for Light Water Reactor Spent Fuel Storage Facilities 

at Nuclear Power Stations 

ANSI-N 14.6, Standard for Special Lifting Devices for Shipping Containers Weighing 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 12 65001.13 

10,000 Pounds (5 ton) or More for Nuclear Materials 

ANSI B30.9, ASlings@

ANSI B30.10 , AHooks@ 

ANSI B30.2, Performance Standards for Overhead Electric Wire Rope Hoists 

ANSI B30.16, Performance Standards for Air Wire Rope Hoists 

ANSI B30.11, Overhead and Gantry Cranes 

ASME NOG-1, Rules for Construction of Overhead and Gantry Cranes (Top Running 

Bridge, Multiple Girder) 

ASME B&PV Code Section III 

AWS D1.1, Structural Welding Code 

AWS D14.1, Specification for Welding Industrial and Mill Cranes 

CMAA-70, Specifications for Top Running Bridge and Gantry Type Multiple Girder Electric 

Overhead Traveling Cranes 

ANSI/ANS 57.3, Design Requirements for New Fuel Storage Facilities at Light Water 

Reactor Plants 

NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan 9.1.4, Light Load Handling System (Related to 

Refueling) 

NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan 9.1.5, Overhead Heavy Load Handling Systems 

NUREG-0800, Standard Review Plan 9.1.2, New and Spent Fuel Storage 

END 

Attachment 1: Revision History for IP 65001.13 
Issue Date: 08/05/09 Att1-1 

Attachment 1 

Revision History for IP 65001.13 

Commitment Tracking Number 

Issue Date Description of Change Training 

Needed 

Training Completion Date 

CRA

N/A 08/05/09 

CN 09-019 

Researched commitments for 4 years and found none. Initial issuance to support ITAAC related inspections under 10 CFR 52 

No N/A N