alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew W. Dorn, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB ofGreat Lakes Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrantand have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

August 13, 2004

 

/s/ Andrew W. Dorn, Jr.                  Andrew W. Dorn, Jr.President & Chief Executive Officer
No. II-10-004 February 10, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULED TO DISCUSS SAFETY OVERSIGHT OF 

LES ENRICHMENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with officials of 

Louisiana Energy Services in Eunice, N.M., to discuss the company’s performance during the 

construction of the National Enrichment Facility near Eunice. 

The meeting is scheduled for 6 p.m. on Feb. 23 at the Eunice Community Center at 906 

12th Street in Eunice. Its purpose is to discuss the results of the NRC’s Assessment of Licensee 

Performance, which covers the period from July 1, 2008 through Nov. 30, 2009. 

The meeting is open to the public, and NRC officials will be available to answer 

questions from interested observers. 

The discussion will include management measures, facility construction and facility 

support. In its report, the staff concluded that LES conducted its activities safely and in 

accordance with the license requirements. The staff’s review did not identify a need for any 

improvement in the areas evaluated, though it did identify some inspection findings in quality 

assurance oversight and design controls that require the continued focus of LES management. 

When completed, the gas centrifuge plant will enrich uranium for use in nuclear power 

plant fuel. The NRC will schedule another public meeting in the area to discuss the results of the 

agency's operational readiness reviews. 

 A copy of the NRC letter to the company regarding the review is publicly available 

online at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . The number to access the document 

is ML100201057. 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
# L_2019194EN.01000101.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 194/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part (1)

The European Union and the Union of Comoros have notified the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Interim Agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between the Eastern and Southern Africa States, on the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part, in accordance with Article 62 of that Agreement. Consequently, the Agreement applies provisionally as from 7 February 2019 between the European Union and the Union of Comoros.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 111, 24.4.2012, p. 2.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Clark T. Chambers, Respondent, against Bernard H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Assessors of the Village of North Tarrytown, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
# L_2019036EN.01006101.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/61

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 100/2017

of 5 May 2017

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2019/212]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1253 of 29 July 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 92/2010 as regards the data exchange between customs authorities and national statistical authorities and the compilation of statistics (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1253 of 29 July 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 92/2010 as regards the data exchange between customs authorities and national statistical authorities and the compilation of statistics (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 8aa (Commission Regulation (EU) No 92/2010) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32016 R 1253: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1253 of 29 July 2016 (OJ L 205, 30.7.2016, p. 12).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32016 R 1253: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1253 of 29 July 2016 (OJ L 205, 30.7.2016, p. 12).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1253 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 May 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 205, 30.7.2016, p. 12.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 870.1102 Amount of a Living Benefit. ( a ) ( 1 ) An employee may elect to receive either: ( i ) A full Living Benefit, which is all of his/her Basic insurance, or
( ii ) A partial Living Benefit, which is a portion of his/her Basic insurance, in a multiple of $1,000.
( 2 ) An annuitant or compensationer may only elect to receive a full Living Benefit.
( b ) The amount of Basic insurance elected as a Living Benefit will be reduced by an actuarial amount representing the amount of interest lost to the Fund because of the early payment of benefits.
( c ) ( 1 ) If an individual elects a full Living Benefit, the post-election BIA will be 0. If an employee elects a partial Living Benefit, the post-election BIA will be the BIA reduced in proportion to the amount of Basic insurance elected as a Living Benefit, as prescribed by Pub. L. 103-409 (108 Stat. 4231).
( 2 ) The post-election BIA cannot change after the effective date of a Living Benefit election.
( d ) ( 1 ) If an employee elects a full Living Benefit, Basic accidental death and dismemberment coverage terminates as of the effective date of the election.
( 2 ) If an employee elects a partial Living Benefit, Basic accidental death and dismemberment coverage is reduced to equal the post-election BIA.
### §230503. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are as provided in its articles of incorporation, constitution, and bylaws and include a commitment—

(1) to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States;

(2) to foster improvement of the condition of Vietnam-era veterans;

(3) to promote the social welfare (including educational, economic, social, physical, and cultural improvement) of Vietnam-era veterans and other veterans in the United States by encouraging their growth, development, readjustment, self-respect, self-confidence, and usefulness;

(4) to improve conditions for Vietnam-era veterans and develop channels of communication to assist Vietnam-era veterans;

(5) to conduct and publish research, on a nonpartisan basis, pertaining to—

(A) the relationship between Vietnam-era veterans and American society;

(B) the Vietnam war experience;

(C) the role of the United States in securing peaceful coexistence for the world community; and

(D) other matters that affect the educational, economic, social, physical, or cultural welfare of Vietnam-era veterans, other veterans, and their families;

(6) to assist disabled Vietnam-era veterans and other veterans in need of assistance and the dependents and survivors of those veterans; and

(7) to consecrate the efforts of the members of the corporation, and Vietnam-era veterans generally, to mutual helpfulness and service to their country.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1486.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230503 | 36:3803. | May 23, 1986, Pub. L. 99–318, §3, 100 Stat. 474. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".
#### David Lackomowitz, Appellant, v. Jerome E. Bates and Leonard W. Bates, Copartners, etc., and Another, Respondents.

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this ease may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and .order, in so far as they affect defendant McGonigle, affirmed, without costs; in so far as they affect the defendants Bates, reversed and new trial granted, with costs against appellants Bates to abide the event. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 507; *Ferguson*v. *Crawford,*70 N. Y. 253; *Sinnott*v. *Sanan,*156 App. Div. 323.) There is no pleading nor proof which makes it proper for us to pass upon the effect of a motion asserted to have been made in the Municipal Court to set aside the judgment on the ground that the defendant in that action was not served with summons; therefore, that question is left undetermined by this appeal. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### § 734.701 General.

In addition to the provisions regulating political activity set forth in subparts A through G of this part, there are a number of statutes and Executive orders that establish standards to which the political activity of an employee, a Federal labor organization, a Federal employee organization, and a multicandidate political committee must conform. The list set forth in § 734.702 references some of the more significant of those statutes. It is not comprehensive and includes only references to statutes of general applicability.
#### § 831.809 Reemployment.

An employee who has been mandatorily separated under 5 U.S.C. 8335(b) is not barred from reemployment in any position except a primary position after age 60. Service by a reemployed annuitant is not covered by the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336(c).
No: II-07-054 November 28, 2007 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING DEC. 5 AT OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT 

TO DISCUSS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR PERFORMANCE DEFICIENCIES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting Dec. 5 at the 

Oconee nuclear power plant near Seneca, S.C., to discuss with plant officials performance 

deficiencies, lessons learned, and proposed corrective actions for degraded performance of all 

three Oconee reactors. 

The meeting is scheduled from 10:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m., in the World of Energy at 

7812 Rochester Highway in Seneca. The meeting is between the NRC and Duke Energy but is 

open to observation by the public and media, and NRC officials will be available after the 

meeting to answer any questions. 

 NRC Acting Regional Administrator Victor McCree said the Oconee reactors “continue 

to operate safely” but that two “white” findings and one “white” performance indicator resulted 

in performance at all three units to be in the degraded cornerstone column of the NRC’s action 

matrix from the fourth quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007. That level of performance at 

a nuclear plant means NRC objectives are being met but there is a minimal reduction in the 

safety margin, leading to additional meetings between the NRC and plant management, 

additional NRC inspections and a self-assessment by the plant operator with NRC oversight. 

 McCree said the degraded performance was a result of: (1) a fourth quarter 2006 “white” 

inspection finding involving failure to implement adequate foreign material exclusion controls 

for the Unit 3 reactor building emergency sump; (2) a third quarter 2006 “white” finding 

involving failure to effectively control maintenance activities, resulting in a breach of the 

standby shut down facility external flood protection barrier: and (3) a fourth quarter 2006 

emergency AC power system “white” performance indicator for the unavailability of the Keowee 

hydro-electric Unit 2 due to an extended forced outage. The nearby Keowee plant supplies 

emergency power to the Oconee units if offsite power is unavailable. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
A copy of a letter and its enclosure, sent to Duke Energy on November 20, along with 

supplemental inspection reports of the three White issues and the resulted degraded performance, 

are available on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §170302. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Pearl Harbor Survivors Association (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit corporation incorporated in Missouri, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1442.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170302(a) | 36:3601. | Oct. 7, 1985, Pub. L. 99–119, §§1, 17, 99 Stat. 498, 501. |
| 170302(b) | 36:3616. | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title.
COMMERCIALLENDING: WHEN?

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-21003

Summary Calendar

__________________

PATRICIA W. GILL,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 93-CV-2764

- - - - - - - - - -

July 26, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patricia W. Gill appeals the grant of summary judgment for

Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, raising several issues that do not

address the basis of the judgment. We have carefully reviewed

the record and appellate arguments. We find no error in the

district court's ruling. See Gill v. Dalkon Shield Claimants

Trust, No. H-93-2764 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 1995). 
No.

-2-

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED.
### **CHAPTER 101—GENERAL**

Sec.
10101.
Audits.
10102.
Reservation of right to amend or repeal.
### **CHAPTER 25—AMENDMENT AND CORRECTION OF PATENTS**

Sec.
251.
Reissue of defective patents.
252.
Effect of reissue.
253.
Disclaimer.
254.
Certificate of correction of Patent and Trademark Office mistake.
255.
Certificate of correction of applicant's mistake.
256.
Correction of named inventor.
257.
Supplemental examinations to consider, reconsider, or correct information.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–29, §12(b), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 327, added item 257.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(a)(18), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1905, substituted "Correction of named inventor" for "Misjoinder of inventor" in item 256.

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949, substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in item 254.
### §303. National floral emblem

The flower commonly known as the rose is the national floral emblem.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 303 | 36:187. | Oct. 7, 1986, Pub. L. 99–449, 100 Stat. 1128. |

Section

The text of 36:187 (words after comma) is omitted as executed because the proclamation was made on November 20, 1986. See Proclamation No. 5574, 51 Fed. Reg. 42197.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Proc. No. 5574. The Rose Proclaimed the National Floral Emblem of the United States of America

Proc. No. 5574, Nov. 20, 1986, 51 F.R. 42197, provided:

Americans have always loved the flowers with which God decorates our land. More often than any other flower, we hold the rose dear as the symbol of life and love and devotion, of beauty and eternity. For the love of man and woman, for the love of mankind and God, for the love of country, Americans who would speak the language of the heart do so with a rose.

We see proofs of this everywhere. The study of fossils reveals that the rose has existed in America for age upon age. We have always cultivated roses in our gardens. Our first President, George Washington, bred roses, and a variety he named after his mother is still grown today. The White House itself boasts a beautiful Rose Garden. We grow roses in all our fifty States. We find roses throughout our art, music, and literature. We decorate our celebrations and parades with roses. Most of all, we present roses to those we love, and we lavish them on our altars, our civil shrines, and the final resting places of our honored dead.

The American people have long held a special place in their hearts for roses. Let us continue to cherish them, to honor the love and devotion they represent, and to bestow them on all we love just as God has bestowed them on us.

The Congress, by Senate Joint Resolution 159 [Pub. L. 99–449, now this section], has designated the rose as the National Floral Emblem of the United States and authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation declaring this fact.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, RONALD REAGAN, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim the rose as the National Floral Emblem of the United States of America.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of November, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and eleventh.

Ronald Reagan.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 75786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29711]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD

Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in the membership of the Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board for the Chemical Safety and 
Hazard Investigation Board (CSB).

DATES: Effective December 19, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Lau, Human Resources Director, 
(202) 261-7600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management, a performance review board (PRB). The PRB reviews 
initial performance ratings of members of the Senior Executive Service 
(SES) and makes recommendations as to final annual performance ratings 
for senior executives. Because the CSB is a small independent Federal 
agency, the SES members of the CSB's PRB are drawn from other Federal 
agencies.
    The Chairperson of the CSB has appointed the following individuals 
to the CSB Senior Executive Service PRB:
    PRB Members--Fran Leonard, Chief of Staff, Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service serves as Chair of the PRB. William Huneke, 
Director, Office of Economics, Surface Transportation Board will serve 
as a Member of the PRB.
    Nancy Weiss, General Counsel, Institute of Museum and Library 
Services, continues to serve as a Member of the PRB, as announced in 
the Federal Register of September 20, 2013 (78 FR 57837).
    This notice is published in the Federal Register pursuant to the 
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: December 15, 2014.
Rafael Moure-Eraso,
Chairperson.
[FR Doc. 2014-29711 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
```