alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: September 11, 2014 517227

________________________________ In the Matter of NATHANIEL JAY, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

________________________________ Calendar Date: August 4, 2014 Before: Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________ Nathaniel Jay, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

__________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Rensselaer County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating various prison disciplinary rules after a search of his prison cell disclosed, among other things, gang-related items. He was found guilty of possessing gang-related material following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.-2- 517227

We confirm. The misbehavior report and hearing testimony, including that of a prison official with experience in identifying gang-related materials, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Doyle v Prack, 115 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2014], lv denied NY3d [June 30, 2014]; Matter of Boyd v Fischer, 108 AD3d 995, 995 [2013]). Petitioner contends that several confiscated items had been reviewed by the mail room at his previous facility without incident but, even if true, "this would not alter the fact that 'the material is nonetheless prohibited by the prison disciplinary rule'" (Matter of Madison v Fischer, 108 AD3d 959, 960 [2013], quoting Matter of Smith v Fischer, 100 AD3d 1314, 1314 [2012]). The record further establishes that the hearing was commenced and completed in a timely manner and that proper extensions were obtained (see Matter of Shepherd v Fischer, 111 AD3d 1213, 1214 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 864 [2014]). We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions, including that the Hearing Officer was biased and that all of an offending pamphlet had previously been approved through the media review process, and find them to lack merit. Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES 

 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 REGION I 

 475 ALLENDALE ROAD 

 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406-1415 

November 6, 2009 

Cynthia Sanders 

Manager 

Radioactive Materials Program 

Environmental Protection Division 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

4220 International Parkway, Suite 100 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

Dear Ms. Sanders: 

A periodic meeting with your Office was held on October 28, 2009. The purpose of the meeting 

was to review and discuss the status of the Georgia Department of Natural Resource’s 

Agreement State program. The NRC was represented by Monica Orendi and me. 

I have completed and enclosed a general meeting summary, including any specific actions that 

will be taken as a result of the meeting. 

If you feel that our conclusions do not accurately summarize the meeting discussion, or have 

any additional remarks about the meeting in general, please contact me at (610) 337-5214, or 

email to James.Kottan@nrc.gov to discuss your comments. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

James Kottan 

Regional State Agreements Officer 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 

Enclosure: As stated 

 
November 6, 2009 

Cynthia Sanders 

Manager 

Radioactive Materials Program 

Environmental Protection Division 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

4220 International Parkway, Suite 100 

Atlanta, GA 30354 

Dear Ms. Sanders: 

A periodic meeting with your Office was held on October 28, 2009. The purpose of the meeting 

was to review and discuss the status of the Georgia Department of Natural Resource’s 

Agreement State program. The NRC was represented by Monica Orendi and me. 

I have completed and enclosed a general meeting summary, including any specific actions that 

will be taken as a result of the meeting. 

If you feel that our conclusions do not accurately summarize the meeting discussion, or have 

any additional remarks about the meeting in general, please contact me at (610) 337-5214, or 

email to James.Kottan@nrc.gov to discuss your comments. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/ 

James Kottan 

Regional State Agreements Officer 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety 

Enclosure: As stated 

 

Distribution: 

Aaron McCraw, FSME 

Monica Orendi, FSME 

John Kinneman, RI DNMS 

Daniel Collins, RI DNMS 

SUNSI Review Complete: JJK (Reviewer=s Initials) 

DOCUMENT NAME: 

After declaring this document AAn Official Agency Record@ it will be released to the Public. 

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with 

attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy LTR: ML093160518; Encl: ML093160540 

OFFICE DNMS/RI E DNMS/RI N 

NAME DJanda/DMJ JKottan/JJK 

DATE 11/10/09 11/6/09 

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
### §150711. Service of process

The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Designation of the agent shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1394.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150711 | 36:435(b). | Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 427, §5(b), 67 Stat. 563. |

Section

The word "have" is substituted for "maintain" for consistency in the revised title. The words "at all times" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "to receive" are substituted for "authorized to accept", and the words "is notice to or service on" are substituted for "shall be deemed sufficient notice or service upon", for consistency in the revised title.
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------|

Series 2006-1, Class A Notes; Series 2006-1, Class B Notes;

|   | Series 2007-1, Class A Notes and Series 2007-2, Class A Notes |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 

I, Betty A. Earll, Vice President of HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 3.05 of the Second Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Receivables Funding Inc. I, as Transferor, HSBC Finance Corporation, as Servicer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 30th day of March 2009.

 

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.

 

 

By:  /s/ Betty A. Earll

|   | Name:  Betty A. Earll |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | Title:  Vice President |
|--------|------------------------|
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2254

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1101 Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, 

as the ‘‘Bruce Woodbury Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2254 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1101 Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Bruce Woodbury 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Bruce Woodbury Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
### §152913. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be submitted at the same time as the report of the audit required by section 10101 of this title. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1422.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152913 | 36:2912. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–561, §13, 98 Stat. 2912. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 204 of House Document No. 103–7.
No. I-08-050 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

September 10, 2008

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region I office in 

King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Amar Patel as the Resident Inspector at 

the Hope Creek nuclear power plant in Hancocks Bridge, N.J. 

 Patel joins Senior Resident Inspector Blake Welling at Hope 

Creek. Two resident inspectors are also assigned to the adjacent Salem 

Units 1 & 2. Hope Creek and Salem are operated by PSEG Nuclear. 

 Patel joined the agency’s Region I staff in 2002 after earning a bachelor’s degree 

in electrical engineering from Drexel University in Philadelphia. He is a graduate of the 

NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year training program 

that provides specialized training in nuclear safety and a broad perspective of NRC 

regulatory activities. He also completed a rigorous NRC inspector qualification program. 

Most recently, Patel was a reactor inspector in the Region I Division of Reactor Safety. 

 “Amar Patel has the training, experience and commitment to safety that will help 

the NRC carry out its mission of protecting people and the environment and ensuring the 

safe operation of Hope Creek,” said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant site has at least two NRC resident 

inspectors. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular 

inspections, monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and 

the public. Residents can serve for up to seven years at any one site. 

 The Hope Creek residents can be reached at 856/935-5151. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
(April 21, 1948.)

#### Sadie K. Breakstone et al., Appellants, v. Continental Bank & Trust Company of New York et al., Respondents.

Whatever may be said of the attitude of one or two of the directors in the negotiations, we cannot say that the directors as a whole were not warranted in approving the offer of Chemical Bank & Trust Company. It was for the stockholders to decide the fate of their company. This they have done with knowledge of the competing offers. Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
§ 847.906 How is the present value of a deferred annuity without credit for NAFI service computed? ( a ) The present value of a deferred annuity equals the present value of the deferred annuity without credit for the NAFI service as of the deferred annuity date discounted for interest to that date.
( b ) The present value of the deferred annuity without credit for the NAFI service as of the deferred annuity date equals the retiree's monthly annuity without credit for the NAFI service as of the deferred annuity date times the present value factor for the retiree's age on that date.
( c ) The present value under paragraph (b) of this section is discounted for interest by dividing that amount by a factor equal to the value of the exponential function in which— ( 1 ) The base is one plus the assumed interest rate under 5 CFR part 841, subpart D, on the commencing date of the retiree's immediate annuity, and
( 2 ) The exponent is one-twelfth of the number of months between the commencing date of the retiree's immediate annuity and the deferred annuity date.
# L_2022182EN.01002301.xml

| 7.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 182/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 182/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 51/2022

of 18 March 2022

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1119]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1445 of 23 June 2021 amending Annexes II and VII to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1445 of 23 June 2021 amending Annexes II and VII to Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 51 (Regulation (EU) 2018/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32021 R 1445: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1445 of 23 June 2021 (OJ L 313, 6.9.2021, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32021 R 1445: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1445 of 23 June 2021 (OJ L 313, 6.9.2021, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1445 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 19 March 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 49/2022 of 18 March 2022 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 18 March 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 313, 6.9.2021, p. 4.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

(2)  See page 19 of this Official Journal.

2

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul Albrecht, Appellant, against California Pie & Baking Corporation et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*1048All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         125,983
<SECURITIES>                                    41,113
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                       802
<INVENTORY>                                     43,713
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,707
<PP&E>                                          48,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,908
<SALES>                                         56,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,468
<CGS>                                           35,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,047
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,047
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
NRC 21ST ANNUAL REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE MARCH 10-12 

TO FOCUS ON SAFETY AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING

 The theme of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 21st Annual Regulatory Information 

Conference (RIC) will be Safe Today -- Safer Tomorrow: The Power of Sharing Knowledge. The RIC 

will be held March 10-12 at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli 

Road, Bethesda, Md. More than 2,300 people are expected to attend, including representatives from more 

than 25 foreign countries, the nuclear industry and congressional staff. 

 

 Agency speakers at the conference will include NRC Chairman Dale E. Klein and 

Commissioners Gregory B. Jaczko, Peter B. Lyons, Kristine L. Svinicki, and Executive Director for 

Operations William Borchardt. This year’s special guest speaker is Jason Grumet, the founder and 

president of the Bipartisan Policy Center, which has been active in leading unique coalitions that could 

lead to significant policy achievements at both the state and federal level. 

 

 The conference brings together NRC staff, plant owners, nuclear materials users and other 

interested stakeholders to discuss nuclear safety and security topics and current regulatory activities. 

Topics at this year’s RIC include: construction and licensing of new nuclear power plants; advanced 

reactor designs; security; safety research; domestic and international nuclear power plant operating 

experience; technical issues such as digital instrumentation and control in nuclear plants and fire 

protection; operator training; and safe disposal of nuclear waste. The conference will also feature posters, 

exhibits and models on various nuclear topics of interest. 

 The RIC also offers tours of the NRC’s Operations Center, which serves as the focal point for 

coordinating and communicating with plant personnel, state entities, and other federal agencies during an 

emergency involving a nuclear facility or nuclear materials. 

 The full conference program is available on the NRC’s Web site at this address: 

http://www.nrcric.org/ricProgram.asp. 

 The conference is free and open to the public. The RIC is a joint presentation of the NRC's 

Offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Nuclear Regulatory Research. Onsite registration will be 

available during the conference. For more information, visit the RIC Web site at http://www.nrcric.org. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-038 February 26, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7165

JENNIFER L. BUNCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HENRICO COUNTY; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-1411)

Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: November 21, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jennifer L. Bunch, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer L. Bunch appeals the district court’s order denying

her motion to reconsider pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Bunch v. Henrico

County, No. CA-02-1411 (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2003; entered June

26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §50110. Service of process

The corporation shall comply with the law on service of process of each State in which it is incorporated and each State in which it carries on activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1343.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50110 | 36:3704. | Dec. 9, 1985, Pub. L. 99–172, §4, 99 Stat. 1021. |

Section

The words "in furtherance of its corporate purposes" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### § 839.803 If I am like the person in the previous question, but the amount I paid as deductions under CSRS is more than the amount of combined retirement deductions and Social Security taxes due for my new retirement coverage, will I get a refund of the excess?

Yes, either OPM or your employer, as appropriate, will issue the payment in accordance with OPM instructions.