alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2130 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2130

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 650 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, as the ``New Bridge 
                         Landing Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2003

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 650 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, as the ``New Bridge 
                         Landing Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW BRIDGE LANDING POST OFFICE.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 650 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, and 
known as the North Hackensack Station Post Office, shall be known and 
designated as the ``New Bridge Landing Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the New Bridge 
Landing Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-09-0054 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2008.

Accession Number: ML090540513

Date Released: Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML090540523 - SECY-09-0054 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2008 (12 page(s), 4/6/2009)
    - ML090540538 - SECY-09-0054 - Enclosure 1 - Reactor Oversight Process Program Area Evaluations (11 page(s), 4/6/2009)
    - ML090540545 - SECY-09-0054 - Enclosure 2 - Stakeholder Survey Results (7 page(s), 4/6/2009)
    - ML090540570 - SECY-09-0054 - Enclosure 3 - Regulatory Impact Summary (2 page(s), 4/6/2009)
    - ML090540575 - SECY-09-0054 - Enclousre 4 - Reactor Oversight Process Resources (4 page(s), 4/6/2009)
    - ML090540587 - SECY-09-0054 - Enclosure 5 - Resident Inspector Demographics (10 page(s), 4/6/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 839.1111 If I elect to change my retirement coverage under the FERCCA, can I change the election I originally made at retirement for survivor benefits? ( a ) Yes, if you elect to change your retirement coverage under the FERCCA, you will have an opportunity to change the election you made for survivor benefits.
( b ) If you elect less than the maximum survivor benefit, your spouse's consent is necessary in accordance with § 831.614 or § 842.603(a)(1) of this chapter, as applicable.
---

Exhibit 8.1

The following table sets forth a list of our subsidiaries.

|Name of
      Subsidiary                 | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Adira Energy
      Holding Corp.1        | Ontario, Canada              
|Adira CBM
      Ltd.2                    | Israel                       
|Adira Oil
      Technologies Ltd.2       | Israel                       
|Adira Energy
      Israel Ltd.2          | Israel                       
|Adira Energy
      Israel Services Ltd.2 | Israel                       
|Adira GeoGlobal
      Ltd.3              | Israel                       

Notes:

| | 1. | Adira Energy Holding Corp. is a wholly-owned direct
      subsidiary of the Registrant.                                                            
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | These companies are second-tier wholly-owned indirect
      subsidiaries of the Registrant, which are held through Adira Energy
      Holding Corp.
| |    |                                                                                                                                                    
| | 3. | The Registrant holds an indirect 60% interest in Adira
      Energy GeoGlobal Ltd. through Adira Energy Holding
Corp.                              

---
# L_2018297EN.01002801.xml

| 22.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 22/2017

of 3 February 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1756]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/576 of 14 April 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘rafoxanide’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/576 of 14 April 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘rafoxanide’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 0576: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/576 of 14 April 2016 (OJ L 99, 15.4.2016, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 0576: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/576 of 14 April 2016 (OJ L 99, 15.4.2016, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/576 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 February 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 99, 15.4.2016, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Maine Coast Railroad Corporation

SEP 2 6 2001

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continuing status of Maine Coast Railroad Corporation (MCR), B.A.

No. 3121, as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 231, et seg.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351, et seg.) (RUIA). MCR was ruled to be an employer under

the RRA and RUIA effective August 26, 1990.

According to Mr. James E. Howard, attorney for MCR, the railroad

ceased all operations and last compensated its employees on

December 6, 2000. MCR operated its equipment on trackage which it

leased from the State of Maine. Surface Transportation Board 

Authority for MCR’s termination of service over the lines it leased is set

forth in STB Finance Docket Numbers 31727 and 32271, both dated

October 5, 2000. Although MCR has not been formally dissolved as a

corporation, Mr. Howard advised that it has sold certain of its

equipment and it is in the process of disposing of the balance of its

assets over the next few months.

In view of the foregoing, it is the determination of the Railroad

Retirement Board that the Maine Coast Railroad Corporation ceased

being an employer under the RRA and RUIA effective December 6,

2000, the date as of which it terminated its operations.

Jerome F. Kever

BA# 3121
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Rogers Peet Company, Appellant-Respondent, against William W. Mills et al., as Tax Commissioners of the City of New York, Respondents-Appellants. [479-485 5th Ave., 1-7 E. 41st St., 14—16 E. 42nd St., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
# L_2022069EN.01012701.xml

| 4.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/127

---

DECISION No 74/2021 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 8 February 2022

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Telecommunication Equipment [2022/371]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column 'EC access to the US market' in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Telecommunication Equipment. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.
  This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington, on 2 February 2022

On behalf of the European Union

Lucian CERNAT

Signed in Brussels, on 8 February 2022

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column 'EC access to the US market' in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Telecommunication Equipment

| KL-Certification GmbH |
| --- |
| Heinrich-Hertz-Allee 7 |
| 66386 St. Ingbert |
| GERMANY |

KL-Certification GmbH

Heinrich-Hertz-Allee 7

66386 St. Ingbert

GERMANY

---
### **CHAPTER 203—AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS**

Sec.
20301.
Organization.
20302.
Purpose.
20303.
Membership.
20304.
Powers.
20305.
Annual meeting.
20306.
Annual report.
20307.
Nonapplication of audit requirements.
#### Abraham Schlein, Appellant, v. Morris Metzger et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Metzger & Cohen, Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 831.1732 Commencing date of composite retirement annuity. ( a ) The commencing date of the composite retirement annuity of a phased retiree who enters full retirement status is the day after separation.
( b ) A phased retirement annuity terminates upon separation from service.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/ A for the Year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


JULY 11, 2005                 /S/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                              -----------------------
                              JOHN J. JOYCE
                              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO AMBIENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY AMBIENT CORPORATION AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Robert L. Rodd, Appellant, v. Kamen Products Co. Inc. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

The assignment delivered to plaintiff was void. *(Manhattan Commercial Co.*v. *Paul,*216 N. Y. 481; *Martin*v. *National Sur. Co.,*300 U. S. 588; *McKenzie*v. *Irving Trust Co.,*292 N. Y. 347.) It was not executed in accordance with Federal law. (U. S. Code, tit. 31, § 203, U. S. Rev. Stat., § 3477.) No warrant for payment had issued and payment thereunder had not been made. The United States was a creditor of the corporation. The assignment had no present value and, therefore, could not work a dis*856charge of the notes. *(Wise*v. *Chase,*44 N. Y. 337, 340.) At best it was a conditional payment of the notes. *(Cherey*v. *McLaughlin,*245 N. Y. 616.) It woidd become effective only if and when the United States issued its warrant and made payment of the overassessment of income taxes. The corporate maker was, therefore, not discharged by delivery and acceptance of the assignment. The Trial Justice obviously permitted his erroneous conclusion that the assignment constituted absolute payment of the notes to shape his examination of the plaintiff and to enter into his determination as to the credibility of plaintiff on the question of fact as to waiver of presentment and waiver of notice of presentment. The findings in the decision that there was no waiver of presentment and that the assignment was given in full payment of the notes are reversed. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 839.213 May I make a retirement coverage election if I withdrew all or part of my TSP account after I was corrected to FERS? ( a ) You may not make a retirement coverage election if your qualifying retirement coverage error was previously corrected to FERS, and you later received one of the following TSP withdrawals: ( 1 ) A TSP annuity after separation from service, but before receiving a FERS annuity; or
( 2 ) A single payment or monthly payments after separation from service; or
( 3 ) An age-based in-service withdrawal.
( b ) If you received an automatic cashout of your TSP account after you separated (because your account balance was $3,500 or less), or if you received a financial hardship in-service withdrawal, you may make a retirement coverage election.
# L_2020210EN.01007501.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/75

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 90/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2020/838]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1866 of 28 November 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are banned from operating or are subject to operational restrictions within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1866 of 28 November 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are banned from operating or are subject to operational restrictions within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 1866: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1866 of 28 November 2018 (OJ L 304, 29.11.2018, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 1866: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1866 of 28 November 2018 (OJ L 304, 29.11.2018, p. 10).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1866 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 29.11.2018, p. 10.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 841.413 Determinations of amount due from each agency. ( a ) For each pay period, each agency will determine the total amount of basic pay paid to employees in each category of employees.
( b ) For each category of employees, the amount due from each agency for a pay period is the product of— ( 1 ) The total amount of basic pay of employees in that category of employees in that agency; and
( 2 ) The normal cost percentage.
[51 FR 47187, Dec. 31, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 25196, July 6, 1987]
### §105. Child Health Day

The President is requested to issue each year a proclamation—

(1) designating the first Monday in October as Child Health Day; and

(2) inviting all agencies and organizations interested in child welfare to unite on Child Health Day in observing exercises that will make the people of the United States aware of the fundamental necessity of a year-round program to protect and develop the health of the children of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1255.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 105 | 36:143. | May 18, 1928, ch. 643, 45 Stat. 617; Sept. 22, 1959, Pub. L. 86–352, 73 Stat. 627. |

Section
GSA SIGNS LEASE FOR THIRD NRC HEADQUARTERS BUILDING 

The General Services Administration, acting on behalf of the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, has signed a lease with developer LCOR to build a 14-story office building adjacent 

to the NRC’s two Rockville, Md., headquarters offices. This will permit the reconsolidation of staff 

displaced by agency growth. 

“This is a tremendous accomplishment,” said NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko. “A lot of 

people worked long and hard on this project, and it is great to see it come to fruition.” 

“Now we can bring back to the main complex functions that we had to move out as the 

agency expanded to deal with new reactor applications. One of the core lessons of the Three Mile 

Island event is that the NRC functions best when its constituent parts are co-located, and that will be 

accomplished in just a few years,” he added. 

The approximately 360,000 square feet of space – which the developer believes can be ready 

by July 2012 – will house approximately 1,300 NRC personnel. Groundbreaking is expected in 

Spring of 2010. 

The property is across Marinelli Street from the two existing NRC buildings, on the east side 

of Rockville Pike, next to the White Flint Metro station. It will be part of the North Bethesda 

Center, a mixed-use development that LCOR is building in phases on a 32-acre site. LCOR is a real 

estate investment and development company working in the eastern United States and the West 

Coast. 

The building, designed by architect HOK, will meet Leadership in Energy and 

Environmental Design Silver certification standards set by the U.S. Green Building Council. 

A rendering of the new $131 million building is available at this link: 

http://www.northbethesdacenter.com/office.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-179 October 23, 2009
§ 575.203 Eligible categories of employees. ( a ) Except as provided in § 575.204, an Executive agency may pay a relocation incentive to an employee in the following categories of positions: ( 1 ) A General Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5332 or 5305 (or similar special rate authority);
( 2 ) A senior-level or scientific or professional position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5376;
( 3 ) A Senior Executive Service position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5383 or a Federal Bureau of Investigation and Drug Enforcement Administration Senior Executive Service position paid under 5 U.S.C. 3151;
( 4 ) A position as a law enforcement officer, as defined in 5 CFR 550.103;
( 5 ) A position under the Executive Schedule paid under 5 U.S.C. 5311-5317 or a position the rate of pay for which is fixed by law at a rate equal to a rate for the Executive Schedule;
( 6 ) A prevailing rate position, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 5342(a)(3); or
( 7 ) Any other position in a category for which payment of relocation incentives has been approved by OPM at the request of the head of an executive agency.
( b ) Except as provided in § 575.204, a legislative agency may pay a relocation incentive to an employee in a General Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C. 5332 or 5305 (or similar special rate authority).
[70 FR 25743, May 13, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 67838, Dec. 3, 2007]
### §170102. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to preserve the great and basic truths and enduring principles on which this Nation was founded;

(2) to form a national association for the benefit of individuals who have suffered injuries or diseases of the spinal cord;

(3) to acquaint the public with the needs and problems of paraplegics;

(4) to promote medical research in the several fields connected with injuries and diseases of the spinal cord, including research in neurosurgery and orthopedics and in genitourinary and orthopedic appliances; and

(5) to advocate and foster complete and effective reconditioning programs for paraplegics, including a thorough physical reconditioning program, physiotherapy, competent walking instructions, adequate guidance (both vocational and educational), academic and vocational education (both in hospitals and in educational institutions), psychological orientation and readjustment to family and friends, and occupational therapy (both functional and diversional).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1439.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170102 | 36:1153. | Aug. 11, 1971, Pub. L. 92–93, §3, 85 Stat. 317. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".