alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §153708. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in Springfield, Illinois. However, the activities of the corporation are not confined to Springfield but may be conducted throughout the States of the United States and the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1429.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153708 | 36:1009(a). | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §9(a), 76 Stat. 504. |

Section

The word "various" is omitted as unnecessary.
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET FEB. 4-6 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting Feb. 4-6 in Rockville, Md., to discuss several issues of 

current interest. Topics include: guidance for the assessment of beyond-design-basis aircraft 

impacts, revisions to guidance on manual initiation of protective actions that applies to all types 

of nuclear power plants, proposed revisions to NUREG-1520 on the standard review plan for the 

NRC’s review of a license application for a fuel cycle facility, the status of rulemaking for 

disposal of depleted uranium and other unique waste streams, and a draft ACRS report on the 

NRC’s safety research program. 

 The ACRS, a group of experienced technical experts, advises the Commission, 

independently from the NRC staff, on safety issues related to the licensing and operation of 

nuclear power plants as well as those issues in the areas of health physics and radiation 

protection. 

 The meeting will be held in Room T2-B1 in the Two White Flint North building at NRC 

Headquarters at 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. The sessions on Thursday, Feb. 4, and 

Friday, Feb. 5, will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7 p.m., and on Saturday, Feb. 6, from 8:30 a.m. to 1 

p.m. Portions of the meeting may be closed to discuss information that includes classified, 

proprietary, organizational or personnel matters. 

 A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2010/. 

 Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting 

should contact Girija Shukla, at (301) 415-6855. To pursue video conferencing services, contact 

Theron Brown, at (301) 415-8066. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-018 January 27, 2010
#### Virginio F. Orsini, Respondent, *v.*Eastern Wine Corporation, Appellant.

*Per Guriam.*

Applying the rule of liberal construction to the amended complaint, we are of the opinion that enough is set forth to charge that the use of the name Orsini, together with the family crest and the princely crown, identifies the plaintiff in the public mind as the individual whose name is being used without his consent for trade purposes. If the plaintiff establishes that upon a trial he would be entitled to the remedy afforded by the *“*right of privacy statute ”, section 51 of the Civil Rights Law.

The order should be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is insufficient in law.

Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. [190 Mise. 235.] [See *post,*p. 996.]
TAJIKISTAN LIBERALIZES TRADE

----
### §21907. Service of process

As a condition to the exercise of any power or privilege granted by this chapter, the corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of the District of Columbia or of each State, territory, or possession of the United States in which its headquarters, branches, or subdivisions are located, the name and address of an agent in that jurisdiction on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1299.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21907 | 36:3309. | July 5, 1935, ch. 373, §9, 49 Stat. 459. |

Section

The words "precedent", "herein", and "or conferred" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the Secretary or the properly designated officer", and the words "territory, or possession of the United States" are substituted for "Territory", for consistency in the revised title. The words "post-office" and "authorized" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "in that jurisdiction" are added for clarity.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Zsolt Petko and Zsuzsanna Adam v. Carelton Courtyard

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 9 18

- CV

Trial court case number: CV

- 0 077741

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Galveston County

The panel has voted to deny appellant s ’ Motion for Rehearing of the memorandum

opinion and judgment, issued on April 3 , 2018

.

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting for the Panel

Panel consists of: Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Higley

.

Date: July 3 , 2018
No. IV-09-029 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 August 28, 2009 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON 

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Arizona Public Service 

Co. officials on Sept. 10 to discuss the status of performance improvements at the Palo Verde 

Nuclear Generating Station. APS operates the plant, located 55 miles west of Phoenix, Ariz. 

 The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 6 p.m. in the board 

room of the Saddle Mountain Unified School District Office, 38201 W. Indian School Road, 

Tonopah, Ariz. 

 APS officials will present a briefing on the status of performance improvements at Palo 

Verde. The public will have an opportunity to observe and ask questions of NRC staff before the 

meeting is adjourned. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7617

KEVIN T. HARDY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN P. STIRLING,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:17-cv-00306-JMC)

Submitted: January 19, 2021 Decided: January 21, 2021

Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin T. Hardy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin T. Hardy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and 

advised Hardy that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Although Hardy received proper notice 

and timely objected to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived appellate 

review of his racial-profiling-based claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel—the 

only claim raised on appeal—because the objections were not specific to the particularized 

legal recommendations made by the magistrate judge on that claim.

∗

 See Martin, 858 F.3d 

at 245 (holding that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party 

must object to the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as 

reasonably to alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation 

marks omitted)). 

∗ By failing to raise the remaining grounds in his informal brief, Hardy has forfeited 

appellate review of those issues. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
3

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION

Exhibit 31.1



I, Thomas H. Holcom, Jr., certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)       All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---



(b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
        August 22, 2007




/s/ Thomas H. Holcom, Jr.Thomas H. Holcom, Jr.Chief Executive Officer and President
### §70108. Duty to maintain corporate and tax-exempt status

(a) Corporate Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as a corporation incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania.

(b) Tax-Exempt Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1348; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1087(g)(4)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70108(a) | 36:5608(e). | Sept. 23, 1996, Pub. L. 104–201, title XVIII, §§1808(e), 1814 (related to duty to maintain status), 110 Stat. 2761, 2762. |
| 70108(b) | 36:5613 (related to duty to maintain status). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "organized and" and "the State of" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–398 substituted "Pennsylvania" for "Delaware".
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
### §40727. Army support

(a) Logistical Support.—The Secretary of the Army shall provide logistical support to the Civilian Marksmanship Program for competitions and other activities. The corporation shall reimburse the Secretary for incremental direct costs incurred in providing logistical support. The reimbursements shall be credited to the appropriations account of the Department of the Army that is charged to provide the logistical support.

(b) National Matches.—(1) The National Matches may be held at Department of Defense facilities where the National Matches were held before February 10, 1996.

(2) The Secretary shall provide, without cost to the corporation, members of the National Guard and Army Reserve to support the National Matches as part of the annual training under title 10 and title 32.

(c) Regulations.—The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1338.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 40727(a) | 36:5507(a). | Feb. 10, 1996, Pub. L. 104–106, title XVI, §1617, 110 Stat. 519. |
| 40727(b)(1) | 36:5507(c). | |
| 40727(b)(2) | 36:5507(b). | |
| 40727(c) | 36:5507(d). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "other activities" are substituted for "other activities conducted by the Corporation" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b)(1), the words "continue to" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "for the use of" and "performance of" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §170105. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation and its State and regional organizations and local chapters or posts have the exclusive right to use the name "Paralyzed Veterans of America" and seals, emblems, and badges the corporation lawfully adopts.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1441.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170105 | 36:1160. | Aug. 11, 1971, Pub. L. 92–93, §10, 85 Stat. 318. |

Section

The words "sole", "have and", and "in carrying out its purposes" are omitted as unnecessary.
**Exhibit 15.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114188 of Air France-KLM (the “Company”) on FormF-3 of our reports relating to the financial statements of the Company (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s changes in method of accounting for financial instruments toadopt the provisions of International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) No. 32, “*Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentatio**n**”*, and IAS No. 39, “*Financial Instruments: Recognition andMeasurement**”*, effective April 1, 2005, in accordance with the option offered by these standards, as disclosed in Note 3.1) and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting dated July 6,2007 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2007. 

 

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in such registration statement. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Associés 

 

 

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France 

July 6, 2007
#### Terry B. Weinberg, an Infant, by Melvin Weinberg, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. Julius L. Silchenstedt et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Upon the facts in this case it was improper to grant a preference over all other issues. (See *Bitterman*v. *2007 Davidson Ave.,*278 App. Div. 759.) Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### § 410.203 Options for developing employees.

Agencies may use a full range of options to meet their mission-related organizational and employee development needs, such as classroom training, on-the-job training, technology-based training, satellite training, employees' self-development activities, coaching, mentoring, career development counseling, details, rotational assignments, cross training, and developmental activities at retreats and conferences.

[61 FR 66193, Dec. 17, 1996. Redesignated at 74 FR 65388, Dec. 10, 2009]
#### § 919.815 How may I contest a proposed debarment?

If you as a respondent wish to contest a proposed debarment, you or your representative must provide the debarring official with information in opposition to the proposed debarment. You may do this orally or in writing, but any information provided orally that you consider important must also be submitted in writing for the official record.
# L_2020051EN.01000101.xml

| 25.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 51/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 51/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force between the European Union and Mexico, of the Third Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The Third Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, signed in Brussels on 27 November 2018, shall, pursuant to its Article 5.2, enter into force between the European Union and Mexico as from 1 March 2020.

---
Distributed Control Systems

Richard DeVercellyAugust 26, 2008
Definition

z A distributed control system (DCS

refers to a control system in which tcontroller elements are not central ilocation but are distributed throughothe system with each component susystem controlled by one or more controllers. The entire system of controllers are connected by a netwfor communication and monitoring.
Applications

z Electrical Generation and Transmissionz Environmental control systems z Traffic signals z Water management systems z Oil Refining plants z Chemical plants z Pharmaceutical manufacturing z Sensor Networks z Dry cargo and bulk oil carrier ships 
Glossary

z DCS - Distributed Control Systemz SCADA - Supervisory Control and Data 

Acquisition

z PLC - Programmable Logic Controllerz HMI - Human Machine Interfacez RTU - Remote Transmission Unitz DCU - Digital Communication Unit

Elements

z A DCS typically uses computers as controllers and uses both p

interconnections and protocols for communication. 

z The processor receives information from input modules and se

information to output modules. The input modules receive inforfrom input instruments in the process (a.k.a. field) and output mtransmit instructions to the output instruments in the field. 

z Computer buses or electrical buses connect the processor and 

through multiplexers/demultiplexers. Buses also connect the dcontrollers with the central controller and finally to the Human-Interface (HMI) or control consoles. 

z Elements of a distributed control system may directly connect t

equipment such as switches, pumps and valves or may work tintermediate system such as a SCADA system.

EXAMPLE APPLICATION

Network 

Communication

(Ethernet/Fiber Opt
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00333-CV

Betty Lou SHEERIN,

Appellant

v.

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-01245

Honorable Victor Hugo Negron Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2013

VACATED AND DISMISSED

The parties notified the court they reached an agreement resolving the issues in this 

appeal and requested the appeal be abated until January 1, 2013. On November 2, 2012, the court 

granted appellant’s unopposed motion to abate this appeal. We now reinstate the appeal on the 

docket of the court and, pursuant to the agreement of the parties, vacate the trial court’s judgment 

without regard to the merits and dismiss the case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); 43.2(e). All 

costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM