alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017273EN.01000101.xml

| 24.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 273/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, of the other part (1)

The European Union and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan have notified the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Cooperation Agreement on Partnership and Development between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, of the other part on 3 October 2017. Consequently, the Agreement applies provisionally in accordance with Article 59(3) of that Agreement as from 1 December 2017.

By virtue of Article 3 of Council Decision (EU) 2017/434 of 13 February 2017 on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement, the following provisions of the Agreement shall be applied provisionally between the Union the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, but only to the extent that they cover matters falling within the Union's competence, including matters falling within the Union's competence to define and implement a common foreign and security policy:

| | Article 2 (General principles); |
| --- | --- |

Article 2 (General principles);

| | Article 3 (Political dialogue); |
| --- | --- |

Article 3 (Political dialogue);

| | Article 4 (Human rights); |
| --- | --- |

Article 4 (Human rights);

| | Article 5 (Gender equality); |
| --- | --- |

Article 5 (Gender equality);

| | Title III (Development cooperation); |
| --- | --- |

Title III (Development cooperation);

| | Title IV (Cooperation on trade and investment matters); |
| --- | --- |

Title IV (Cooperation on trade and investment matters);

| | Article 28 (Cooperation on migration); |
| --- | --- |

Article 28 (Cooperation on migration);

| | Title VII (Regional cooperation); |
| --- | --- |

Title VII (Regional cooperation);

| | Title VIII (Institutional framework) to the extent that the provisions of that Title are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

Title VIII (Institutional framework) to the extent that the provisions of that Title are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement;

| | Title IX (Final provisions) to the extent that the provisions of that Title are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

Title IX (Final provisions) to the extent that the provisions of that Title are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 67, 14.3.2017, p. 3.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Company, as Trustee under the Will of Edwin F. Knowlton, Deceased, Respondent. Tom C. Clark, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Appellant; Edwin C. von Francken-Sierstorpff et al., Respon*849dents.

The order did not affect any substantial right of the appellant. By the petition it was alleged that the parties sought to be struck out were absolutely or contingently interested in the estate. That allegation was admitted by the answer of appellant. The trial proceeded on the theory that there had been due service of the citation and that the nonresident alien parties were in default. Nothing in the papers shows that the appellant moved at any time during the trial to strike out the parties. The motion was made after the close of the trial, when the appellant had no right to ask for a ruling on a question of law. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 71.) Moreover, it is uncontradicted that the motion made by the parties to be allowed to file an answer and reopen the trial was denied. No prejudice, therefore, resulted to the appellant from the order appealed from and it did not affect a substantial right. *(Matter of Kelly [Langevin],*153 App. Div. 322; *Matter of Soule,*46 Hun 661.) Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
August 25, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COOPER INDUSTRIES, LLC, COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD., COOPER US, 

INC., AND COOPER INDUSTRIES, PLC, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00562-CV V.

PEPSI-COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING CO., INC., AND WHITMAN 

INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the order denying a motion to compel arbitration

in favor of appellees, Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., and Whitman 

Insurance Company Ltd, signed June 20, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the 

record. We have inspected the record and find error in the order of the trial court. 

We therefore REVERSE the order and RENDER judgment ordering arbitration of 

appellees’ claims against appellants Cooper Industries, LLC, Cooper Industries, 

Ltd., Cooper US, Inc., and Cooper Industries, PLC. We REMAND this case to the 

trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including the grant 

of an appropriate stay.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellees, Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., and Whitman Insurance 

Company Ltd.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Henry C. SHIVER, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Ap-pellee.

No. 12033.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 4, 1954.

John Schroder, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Fred W. Kaess, Dwight K. Hambor-sky, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case come on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel on an appeal from an order overruling a motion* to vacate sentence.

And it appearing that the appellant in this case was represented by counsel and was fully advised of his rights by counsel and by the trial court, and there*133after voluntarily pleaded guilty to the crime charged in the indictment;

And it further appearing therefore that there was in this case no question of an extrajudicial confession;

It is ordered that the order of the District Court overruling appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be and it hereby is affirmed.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–149

EXTENSION OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY

REGARDING IRAN

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

A NOTICE STATING THAT THE IRAN EMERGENCY DECLARED BY

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12170 ON NOVEMBER 14, 1979 IS TO CONTINUE BEYOND NOVEMBER 14, 2001, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C.

1622(d)

NOVEMBER 13, 2001.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the

Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed

(1)

To the Congress of the United States:

Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C.

1622(d)) provides for the automatic termination of a national emergency unless, prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the

President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to the

Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this provision,

I have sent the enclosed notice, stating that the Iran emergency declared by Executive Order 12170 on November 14, 1979, is to continue in effect beyond November 14, 2001, to the Federal Register

for publication. The most recent notice continuing this emergency

was published in the Federal Register on November 13, 2000 (65

Fed. Reg. 68061).

Our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the

process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with

Iran is still underway. For these reasons, I have determined that

it is necessary to continue the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, with respect to Iran, beyond November 14, 2001.

GEORGE W. BUSH.

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 9, 2001.

(3)

NOTICE

CONTINUATION OF IRAN EMERGENCY

On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President

declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–

1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States

constituted by the situation in Iran. Because our relations with

Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with Iran is still underway, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, must

continue in effect beyond November 14, 2001. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year this national emergency

with respect to Iran.

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

GEORGE W. BUSH.

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 9, 2001.

Æ
### §30303. Membership

(a) General Membership.—An individual who served in the Armed Forces of the United States and who, in the line of duty in that service, sustained a substantial impairment of sight or vision as defined by the bylaws of the corporation is eligible for general membership in the corporation.

(b) Honorary and Associate Membership.—In addition to general membership, the corporation shall have special classes of honorary and associate membership. Eligibility for, and the rights and obligations of, those special classes are as provided in the bylaws.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1317.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30303 | 36:856. | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §6, 72 Stat. 925. |

Section

In subsection (a), the word "individual" is substituted for "person" for clarity and consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "served in" are substituted for "was enlisted, drafted, inducted, or commissioned in" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "from time to time" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the word "qualification" is omitted as included in "eligibility". The words "All persons who are members of any class of Blinded Veterans Association, Incorporated, on August 27, 1958 shall be members of such class of the corporation" are omitted as executed.
Enclosure 1: Attendance List

Meeting Summary of July 28, 2010 

Public Meeting with NEI

Dated August 4, 2010
1 

Attendance at July 28, 2010, Public Meeting to 

Discuss Observations and Lessons Learned of the Pilot Application of the 

Nuclear Energy Institute’s (NEI) Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment Process

at NRC Headquarters, Rockville, Maryland 

NAME AFFILIATION OFFICE E-MAIL WORK PHONE

Andy Vomastek Dominion Andrew.J.Vomastek@dom.com 860-444-5449

Ann Ramey-Smith NRC/NRR Ann.Ramey-Smith@nrc.gov 301-415-6877

Anthony Pietrangelo NEI

Bill Elling* INPO

Brett McCreary TVA bjmccreary@tva.gov 423-751-8989

Carmen Franklin NRC/NRR Carmen.Franklin@nrc.gov 301-415-5601

Charles Bowman STPNOC ctbowman@stpegs.com 361-972-7454

Christi Branch* PNNL

Darin Benyak Exelon Darin.Benyak@exeloncorp.com 630-657-2811

David Lockbaum* Union of Concerned 

Scientists

David Rencurrel STPNOC dwrencurrel@stpegs.com 361-972-7867

David Solorio NRC/OE dls2@nrc.gov 301-415-0149

Don Rickard* Stars Regulatory Affairs

Doug Walters NEI

Eric Hendrixon Dominion Eric.Hendrixson@dom.com 804-273-2243

Eric Leeds NRC/NRR Eric.Leeds@nrc.gov

Fred Brown NRC/NRR Frederick.Brown@nrc.gov 301-415-1104

Fred Gigliotti Westinghouse gigliotjr@westinhouse.com 412-374-4729

Fred Mladen Dominion Fred.Mladen@dom.com 540-894-2108

Jamnes Cameron* NRC/Region III

Jeanie Copsey* Palo Verde

Jennifer Schaffer NEXTERA (FPL) Jennifer.Schaffer@fpl.com 561-691-2295

Jerry Phifer Constellation Energy Jerry.Phifer@congllc.com 410-495-5248

Jim Slider NEI jes@nei.org 202-739-8015

John Dixon* NRC/STP Resident 

Inspector

John Parry PSEG

* on the phone
2 

NAME AFFILIATION OFFICE E-MAIL WORK PHONE

John Olson* PNNL

Kamishan Martin NRC/NRR Kamishan.Martin@nrc.gov 301-415-3469

Kathy Scott* Scientech

Ken Heffner Progress Energy Ken.Heffner@pgnmail.com 919-546-5688

Ken Taplett STPNOC kjtaplett@stpegs.com 361-972-8416

Lawrence Criscione self lscriscione@hotmail.com 573-230-3959

Lee Blair* Vogtle

Lynne Neal NEI dln@nei.org 202-739-8037

Michael Shea* Palo Verde

Mike Gaffney PSEG/Hope Creek Michael.Gaffneysr@pseg.com 856-396-1229

Molly Keefe NRC/NRR Molly.Keefe@nrc.gov 301-415-5717

Patrick Campbell* GE Hitashi

Paulo Albuquerque Southern Nuclear pcalbuqu@southernco.com 706-826-5573

Ray Powell NRC/RI Raymond.Powell@nrc.gov 610-337-6967

Richard Pepka* Winston & Strawn

Rick Burnside PG&E rjb2@pge.com 805-545-3430

Ron Gaston Exelon Ronald.Gaston@exeloncorp.com 815-417-2800

Scott Schaffer* NRC/Region II

Tim Steele* Calloway

Tom Houghton NEI tch@nei.org 202-739-8107

Tom Kauffman NEI tmk@nei.org 202-739-8010

Troy Pruit* NRC/Region IV

Undine Shoop NRC/NRR Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov 301-415-2063

Valerie Barnes* NRC/RES

* on the phone
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DECISIONS AND REVIEW
### §170504. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(b) Nondiscrimination.—The terms of membership may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1445.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170504(a) | 36:2505 (words before 3d comma). | July 23, 1984, Pub. L. 98–372, §5 (words before 3d comma, words after 3d comma related to discrimination in membership), 98 Stat. 1239. |
| 170504(b) | 36:2505 (words after 3d comma related to discrimination in membership). | |

Section
# L_2022175EN.01002701.xml

| 30.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 175/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 175/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 14/2022

of 4 February 2022

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1062]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 amending Directive 2008/96/EC on road infrastructure safety management (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 amending Directive 2008/96/EC on road infrastructure safety management (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 17j (Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| | ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32019 L 1936: Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘, as amended by:

—

32019 L 1936: Directive (EU) 2019/1936 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2019/1936 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 5 February 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 1.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 23, 

2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-01023-CV

DONALD VAUGHN AND DKV ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellants

V.

DAVID A. BJORKLUND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-22185

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 8, 2014. Appellants 

filed a Stipulation of Dismissal in accordance with the parties’ resolution of all 

claims. We construe the Stipulation of Dismissal as a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350) each of the undersigned
officers of The Brickman Group, Ltd. hereby certify, with respect to its Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Scott W. Brickman  
|Scott W. Brickman      
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Timothy H. Pease   
|Timothy H. Pease       
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4955

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYMONT DAVID BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CR-03-155-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 11, 2006

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick W. Lefler, GIBSON, LEFLER & ASSOCIATES, Princeton, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, United States

Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to a plea agreement, Raymont David Brown pled

guilty to distribution of a quantity of cocaine base (“crack”), in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Brown appealed the

district court’s original sentence of 137 months in prison. We

vacated Brown’s sentence and remanded for resentencing, concluding

that, under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), Brown’s

sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. 

Upon remand, the district court sentenced Brown to 115

months in prison, based on the original guideline calculation as

modified to reflect a two-level reduction in offense level granted

pursuant to the government’s post-remand Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b)

motion for a reduction in sentence. Brown timely appealed.

Brown argues that his sentence following Booker violates

his due process rights, as informed by ex post facto principles.

This claim is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v.

Davenport, 445 F.3d 366 (4th Cir. 2006).

Accordingly, we affirm Brown’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 846.726 Delegation of authority to act as OPM's agent for receipt of employee communications relating to elections.

The employing office is delegated authority to act as OPM's agent for the receipt of any documents that employees are required by this subpart to file with OPM. Such documents are deemed received by OPM on the date that the employing office receives them.
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009,      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of China Growth Development,      Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 20, 2009                          |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| /s/      Aizhong An                              |
| Aizhong      AnChief Operating      Officer |