alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-001 January 3, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC RESCHEDULES MEETING ON HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT TO JAN. 12

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has rescheduled a public meeting at which key issues

involving the Hope Creek nuclear power plant are to be discussed. The reason for the postponement is

to allow adequate time for the NRC staff to complete its review of issues associated with one of the

reactor recirculation pumps at the Hancocks Bridge (Salem County), N.J., facility.

Previously scheduled for Wednesday, Jan. 5, the meeting between NRC staff and

representatives of Public Service Electric and Gas (PSEG), the operator of the plant, will now take

place on Wednesday, Jan. 12. The location will remain unchanged: The Holiday Inn Select Bridgeport,

located off Exit 10 of Interstate 295 in Swedesboro, N.J. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff

will accept questions and comments from the public.

Another topic of discussion at the meeting will be the results of an NRC special inspection

conducted at the plant in response to a steam line failure and shutdown with complications that

occurred there on Oct. 10. In addition, issues involving the exhaust piping for the high-pressure

coolant injection pump will be discussed.

Prior to the meeting, the NRC staff expects to release the results of its analysis of the issues

involving the “B” recirculation pump as well as the preliminary results of the special inspection.

The meeting will take place prior to the plant’s return to service from its current refueling and

maintenance outage.

Background information regarding the Hope Creek plant can be found on a portion of the

NRC’s web site devoted to that plant and the adjacent Salem reactors. The web address is:

www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/hope-creek-salem-issues.html . Specific information on the

technical issues involving the Hope Creek “B” recirculation pump can be found in the NRC’s

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System, or ADAMS, under Accession Numbers

ML043480164 and ML043510279. ADAMS can be accessed at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-

415-4737.

###
No. II-10-050 June 28, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS STARTUP 

AND INSPECTION OF LES PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting in Eunice, N.M., 

to discuss issues related to the startup of the Louisiana Energy Services gas centrifuge uranium 

enrichment plant. 

That discussion will include the agency’s decision to allow the plant to begin operation, 

the inspections that led to that decision, the operational inspection program and continued 

construction inspections. 

The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 8, at 6 p.m. MDT in the Eunice Community 

Center at 906 12th Street in Eunice. There will be brief presentations by the NRC staff and 

members of the public will have opportunities to make comments or ask further questions of the 

NRC staff. 

The LES URENCO USA Facility, located near Eunice, was granted an NRC license in 

June 2006. The license allows LES to enrich uranium up to 5 percent of the isotope uranium-235 

for use in the manufacture of nuclear fuel for commercial power plants. The NRC completed its 

thorough readiness review earlier this month and concluded that the facility could begin 

operation under its NRC license. 

LES is a subsidiary of URENCO, a company that has been using centrifuge technology in 

Europe for many years. 

NRC inspectors conducted extensive evaluations during construction to assess whether 

the plant was built in accordance with its design and NRC regulations. Once construction was 

completed, further detailed NRC inspections looked at safety systems, training, operating 

procedures, security and other aspects of safe facility operation before the agency authorized 

operation. The NRC will continue to inspect the plant’s operations for compliance with 

applicable regulations. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
§ 843.409 Rates of annuities. ( a ) For each month, the amount of annuity payable to each surviving child under this subpart is— ( 1 ) The difference between the basic child's annuity rate for that month and the total amount of child's insurance benefits under title II of the Social Security Act payable for that month to all children of the employee or retiree based on the total earnings (including any non-Federal wages or self employment subject to FICA taxes) of the employee or retiree;
( 2 ) Divided by the total number of children entitled to annuity based on the service of that employee or retiree.
( b ) On the death of the current spouse or the former spouse or termination of the annuity of a child, the annuity of any other child or children is recomputed and paid as though the spouse, former spouse, or child had not survived the former employee or Member.
# L_2020046EN.01001101.xml

| 19.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 46/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 46/11

---

DECISION No 71/2019 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 5 Febuary 2020

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2020/226]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Articles 7 and 14,

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.
  This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington, on 13 January 2020

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels, on 5 February 2020

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services Germany GmbH
  European Compliance Laboratory (ECL)
  Thurn-und-Taxis-Strasse 18
  90411 Nürnberg
  GERMANY |
| --- |

Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services Germany GmbH

European Compliance Laboratory (ECL)

Thurn-und-Taxis-Strasse 18

90411 Nürnberg

GERMANY

---
August 25 , 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COOPER INDUSTRIES, L LC, COOPER INDUSTRIE S, LTD., COOPER US,

INC., AND COOPER IND USTRIES, PLC , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 14

- 00562

- CV V.

PEPSI

- COLA METROPOLITAN BO TTLING CO., INC., AN D WHITMAN

INSURANCE COMPANY LT D , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the order denying a motion to compel arbitration in favor of appel lee s , Pepsi

- Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., and Whitma n Insurance Company Ltd, signed June 20, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the order of the trial court

. We therefore REVERSE the orde r and RENDER judgment ordering arbitration of appellees’ claims against appellants Cooper Industries, LLC, Cooper Industries, Ltd

. , Cooper US, Inc., and Cooper Industries, PLC. We REMAND this case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including the grant of an appropriate stay. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee s , Pepsi

- Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc., and Whitman Insurance Company Ltd.

We further order this decis ion certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedofficer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Sign:                                  | /S/   Richard  A. Smith |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                       |                                   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |                                   |
| March 17, 2006                    |                                   |

 

----
### §1005. Army, Air Force, and Space Force: prompt payments required

Members of the Army, the Air Force, and the Space Force shall be paid at such times that arrears will at no time be more than two months, unless circumstances make further arrears unavoidable.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 490; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §925(k)(1)(A), (B), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3829.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1005 | 37:310b. | R.S. 1189. |

The applicability of this section to members of the Air Force is based on Department of Defense Transfer Order No. 25, dated October 14, 1948.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "Army, Air Force, and Space Force: prompt payments required" for "Army and Air Force: prompt payments required" in section catchline and ", the Air Force, and the Space Force" for "and of the Air Force" in text.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-024 February 3, 2010

NRC HOLDING PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS PROPOSED 

ENHANCEMENTS TO ITS FORCE-ON-FORCE INSPECTIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is holding a public meeting Feb. 10 to discuss with 

the public, the nuclear power industry and other interested stakeholders proposed enhancements 

to the agency’s force-on-force inspection program. 

Force-on-force inspections test a nuclear power plant’s ability to defend against 

adversaries and they are conducted at each plant every three years. A series of table-top drills 

and other assessments precede the three days of mock commando-style attacks against the 

facility. In the event the facility’s security force fails to protect key equipment, the NRC requires 

that deficiencies in the protective strategy be promptly reviewed and corrected. 

NRC staff is currently reviewing options for enhancing these inspections, including 

enhancing the way some of the objectives are assessed. At the meeting, the staff is seeking public 

input into these potential enhancements as well as taking questions and providing as much detail 

as possible without compromising plant security. 

The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Marriott North Bethesda, 5701 

Marinelli Road, Rockville, Md. It can also be accessed remotely via the Internet and a toll-free 

teleconference number. 

The full meeting notice is located here: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/index.cfm?fuseaction=Search.Detail&MC=20100055&NS=0&CFID=351590&CFTO

KEN=63677918. 

 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
ASLB TO WEBSTREAM MARCH 1 PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

IN ROCKVILLE, MD., ON BELLEFONTE CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) will 

hold a prehearing conference March 1 in Rockville, Md., regarding a challenge to the NRC’s 

reinstatement of construction permits for the incomplete Bellefonte reactors in Alabama. 

 Anyone wishing to view the conference over the Internet may do so at this link: 

http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=66071. 

 The board will conduct oral arguments with the petitioners challenging the reinstatement 

(the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League and its Bellefonte Efficiency and Sustainability 

Team chapter, as well as the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy), the applicant (Tennessee 

Valley Authority), and the NRC staff. The arguments will include how the Atomic Energy Act’s 

“good cause” standard applies in this case, along with the admissibility of the petitioners’ 

proposed contentions. 

 The prehearing conference will begin at 9 a.m. March 1 in the NRC’s ASLB hearing 

room, T-3B45, at the agency’s headquarters at 11545 Rockville Pike in Rockville. Members of 

the public are welcome to attend. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-033 February 22, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65490-65491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25224]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3639; Amendment <greek-i>2]


State of Minnesota

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
November 3, 2004, the above declaration is hereby amended to include 
Martin and Olmsted Counties as disaster areas due to damages caused by 
severe storms and flooding occurring on September 14, 2004, and 
continuing through September 27, 2004.

[[Page 65491]]

    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Cottonwood, Jackson, 
Wabasha, Watonwan, and Winona in the State of Minnesota; and Emmet 
County in the State of Iowa may be filed until the specified date at 
the previously designated location. All other counties contiguous to 
the above primary counties have previously been declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is December 6, 2004, and for 
economic injury the deadline is July 7, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: November 4, 2004.
Cheri L. Cannon,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-25224 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 919.1010 Suspending official. ( a ) *Suspending official* means an agency official who is authorized to impose suspension. The suspending official is either: ( 1 ) The agency head; or
( 2 ) An official designated by the agency head.
( b ) [Reserved]
# L_2020006EN.01000201.xml

| 10.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 6/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 6/2

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Armenia on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Armenia on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 9 December 2008, entered into force on 12 November 2009, in accordance with Article 9(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 12 November 2009.

---
B.C.D. 04-41

Employer Status Determination

Old Augusta Railroad Company

Old Augusta Railroad, LLC

SEP 0 2 2004

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continuing

status of Old Augusta Railroad Company (OARC) (B.A. No. 4563) as an employer

under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et sea. ) (RRA) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et sea.) (RUIA). OARC has been an

employer under the RRA and RUIA with service creditable from June 15, 1982. This is

also the determination of the Board concerning the employer status of Old Augusta

Railroad, LLC (OARLLC) as an employer under the RRA and RUIA. OARLLC has not

heretofore been ruled to be an employer under the Acts.

According to information given to the Board by representatives of OARC and

OARLLC, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a non-carrier and parent company of OARC,

sold OARC, with all assets, to Koch Cellulose, LLC, a non-carrier and parent company

of OARLLC. This transaction took place as of the close of business on May 7, 2004, at

which time and date OARC employees were last compensated and OARC ceased

operations. Simultaneously, as of the close of business on May 7, 2004, OARLLC

began operations over the same 2.5 mile line of track to the Leaf River Pulp Mill and

interchanging with the Canadian National Railway Company. Surface

Transportation Board (STB) authority for acquisition and exemption in this matter is set

forth at STB Finance Docket No. 34493. decided April 14, 2004. Additionally, in order

to qualify OARLCC to do business in Mississippi, OARC changed its name to Old Pine

Belt Railroad Company, which is currently a corporate shell with no operations.

Section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate whenever such 

company or person loses any of the characteristics essential to the existence of

an employer status.

Based on the information summarized above, it is determined that Old Augusta

Railroad Company ceased being an employer covered under the RRA and RUIA as

of the close of business on May 7, 2004, the date on which it ceased operations and

last compensated employees.

Section 1 (a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface

Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle IV of Title 49 [45 U.S.C.

§ 231 (a)(1 )(i)]. .

.1

BA#4563
-2-

Sections 1 (a) and 1 (b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§§ 351 (a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition as does section

3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

Based on the information summarized above, it is determined that Old Augusta

Railroad, LLC became an employer covered under the Railroad Retirement

Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act as of the close of business

on May 7, 2004, the date it began operations.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
§ 536.208 Termination of grade retention. ( a ) Grade retention under § 536.201 terminates if any of the conditions listed in § 536.207(a) occurs after commencement of the 2-year period of grade retention.
( b ) Grade retention under § 536.202 terminates if any of the conditions listed in § 536.207(b) occurs after the commencement of the 2-year period of grade retention.
( c ) Termination of grade retention benefits takes effect— ( 1 ) At the end of the day before separation from service if termination is the result of a break in service;
( 2 ) At the end of the day before placement if the termination is the result of the employee's placement in another position; or
( 3 ) At the end of the last day of the pay period in which the employee— ( i ) Declines a reasonable offer;
( ii ) Elects to terminate grade retention benefits (except that, if an employee's election specifically provides that the termination will take effect at the end of a later pay period, the election is considered to be made effective on the last day of that later pay period for the purpose of applying this paragraph); or
( iii ) Fails to enroll in, or comply with reasonable written requirements established to assure full consideration under, a program providing priority consideration for placement.
( d ) If an employee's entitlement to grade retention terminates under this section, the employee's rate of basic pay must be set in accordance with the pay-setting rules and pay rates applicable to the employee's position of record (e.g., 5 CFR part 531, subpart B, for GS positions). An employee is not entitled to pay retention under subpart C of this part based on a reduction in basic pay resulting from waiver of the employee's grade retention entitlement under paragraph (a)(5) or (b) of § 536.207.
[70 FR 31305, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 66155, Nov. 7, 2008]
Transfer

OE to NePlants

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Joseph SearsManager, Chemistry Manager, Chemistry 

NRC-NEI Meeting NEI MeetingFebruary 24, 2010
Transferring OE to New 

Plants

• Review visits

– Supplier participants– Construction sites

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

• Construction experience data 
Transferring OE to New 

Plants

• Documentation examples

– Historical Construction Experie

Apply to New Plant Deploymen

O ti E i tA l

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

–

Operating 

Experience 

to 

Apply 

Advanced Light Water Reactor Designs
Questions 

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations