alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 831.2007 Notification of current and/or former spouse before payment of lump sum. ( a ) Payment of the lump-sum credit based on a refund application filed on or after May 7, 1985, may be made only if any current spouse and any former spouse (from whom the employee or Member was divorced after May 6, 1985) are notified of the former employee's or Member's application.
( b ) ( 1 ) Notification of the former spouse will not be required if the marriage to the former spouse was of less than 9 months duration or if the employee has not completed a total of 18 months of creditable service covered under the retirement system.
( 2 ) Applicants for payment of the lump-sum credit must certify on a form prescribed by OPM whether the applicant has a current or former spouse subject to the notification requirement.
( c ) Proof of notification will consist of a signed and witnessed Statement by the current and/or former spouse on a form provided by OPM acknowledging that he or she has been informed of the former employee's or Member's application for refund and the consequences of the refund on the current or former spouse's possible annuity entitlement. This Statement must be presented to the employing agency or OPM when filing the Application for Refund of Retirement Deductions.
( d ) If the current and/or former spouse refuses to acknowledge the notification or the employee or Member is otherwise unable to obtain the acknowledgement, the employee or Member must submit— ( 1 ) Affidavits signed by two individuals who witnessed the employee's or Member's attempt to personally notify the current or former spouse. The witnesses must attest that they were in the presence of the employee or Member and the current or former spouse when the employee or Member gave or attempted to give the notification form to the current or former spouse and that the employee's or Member's purpose should have been clear to the current or former spouse; or
( 2 ) The current mailing address of the current or former spouse. OPM will attempt to notify (by certified mail—return receipt requested) the current or former spouse at the address provided by the employee or Member. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the lump-sum credit will not be paid until at least 20 days after OPM receives the signed return receipt.
( e ) If an OPM notice sent under paragraph (d)(2) of this section is returned and OPM has no reason to believe that the current or former spouse does not live at the address to which the notice was sent, OPM will re-mail the notice by first class mail and wait at least 20 days after the notice has been re-mailed before paying the refund.
[50 FR 20081, May 13, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 31936, Sept. 8, 1986; 55 FR 9106, Mar. 12, 1990; 55 FR 29340, July 19, 1990]
# L_2014259EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part

The Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part signed in Brussels on 27 June 2014, will be provisionally applied, by virtue of Article 3(1) of the Council Decision on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement (1), as of 1 September 2014.

1

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/494/EU of 16 June 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part (OJ L 261, 30.8.2014, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 736.103 Protecting the identity of a source.

When a source is granted a promise that the source's identity will be kept confidential, the investigative agency and all other agencies that receive information obtained under the promise are required to take all reasonable precautions to protect the source's identity. Each agency will prepare for its investigators and agents implementing instructions consistent with this part.
§ 846.401 Refunds of excess contributions. ( a ) An individual who elects FERS coverage is entitled to a refund of CSRS contributions made prior to the effective date of the election for service that is subject to FERS computation under § 846.304(c) (if not already refunded) which exceed the contributions required under FERS, as provided by this section.
( b ) The refund is equal to— ( 1 ) For service described in § 846.302(a) and performed on or after January 1, 1984, and before January 1, 1987, the amount by which the amount contributed exceeds 1.3 percent of basic pay;
( 2 ) For service described in § 846.302(a) and performed on or after January 1, 1987, the amount by which the amount contributed exceeds the amount required under § 841.503 of this chapter; and
( 3 ) For service described in § 846.302(b), the amount by which the amount contributed exceeds 1.3 percent of basic pay.
( c ) A refund made under this section is payable with interest computed as prescribed under § 831.105 (d) and (e) of this chapter. Interest is payable regardless of the length of the period of service for which refund is being made or the total amount of service the employee has.
( d ) A refund described in this section is payable upon the receipt of an application by OPM or its designee.
EXHIBIT
32.1





ENABLE
HOLDINGS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enable Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Enable Holdings,
Inc.


Date:
      August 14, 2009
              
              /s/
      Jeffrey D. HoffmanBy:
      Jeffrey D. HoffmanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6990

CARL KOFI MAYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TOMMIE SMITH, Officer, acting in his

individual capacity and under color of law;

JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-1961-AM)

Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Carl Kofi Mayers, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Carl Kofi Mayers appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his complaint against two federal correctional officers

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayers v.

Smith, No. CA-00-1961-AM (E.D. Va. April 4 2002; May 29, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 870.1006 Cancellation of insurance. ( a ) An individual who is insured under this subpart may cancel his/her insurance at any time by written request. The cancellation is effective on the 1st day of the pay period after the pay period in which the U.S. Department of State receives the request.
( b ) Cancellation must be requested by the insured individual and cannot be requested by a representative acting on the individual's behalf.
( c ) An individual who cancels the insurance under this section cannot obtain the insurance again, unless the U.S. Department of State determines that it would be against equity and good conscience not to allow the individual to be insured.
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September       30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending September  30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China      Growth Development, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 16, 2009                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| /s/      Jiming Zhu                              |
| Jiming      ZhuChief Financial      Officer |
Nebraska
Interfaith
Power & Light



### Testimony in Support of EPA Section 111(d) Regulations

for Coal-Fired Power Plants

Rev. Kim Morrow Director, Nebraska Interfaith Power & Light

Denver, Colorado July 28, 2014

Climate change is the most pressing moral issue of our time. Climate scientists are nearly unanimous in their warnings of a significantly altered climate in the years ahead, and the dramatic effects that will have on agriculture, public health, housing, food supply, transportation, the economy and more. We are moving into a world that none of us has ever seen before; a world where the very pillars of our lifestyles and our economy and will shift. Our society is not prepared for these changes, and I fear the large-scale human suffering that is bound to follow. Those among us with the fewest resources to adapt are suffering and will continue to suffer the highest burden of these changes. The projections for how climate change will impact Nebraska are sobering. The annual mean maximum temperature for Lancaster County, where I live, is projected to rise 7 degrees F by 2074. These rising temperatures will lead to increased demand for water and energy. At the same time, we are likely to have less water available as less snowpack in the Rocky Mountains will lead to less water flowing into our streams, rivers and aquifer. We will see changes in crop growth cycles, leading to the need for different agricultural practices. We will see both more periods of drought and more episodes of heavy downpours, along with more

extreme storms. It is urgent that we take steps to curb carbon pollution and to mitigate the worst projected effects of climate change. We are at a time when the solutions of the past are no longer viable. Since power plants are responsible for 40% of our nation's carbon pollution, it is critical that we make bold changes in this sector. Regulations from the EPA developed in partnership with individual states is the way to make a profound difference in our nation's future. In the second creation story from the book of Genesis, God calls forth creation from the ground itself. All of life- plants, animals and humans- have their common origins in the sacred and fertile ground. God then puts Adam in the Garden of Eden to till it and to keep it—not to exploit it: but to keep it. In Deuteronomy we hear that "the Lord your God is bringing you into a good Land, a land of flowing streams, a land of olive trees and honey, where you will lack nothing, and where you will bless the Lord your God for the good land he has given you." In these examples we are reminded that we are only here but for the grace of God, who brought forth all creation in God's image. The earth on which we live has

3151 South St., Suite B I Lincoln, NE 168502 I www.nebraskaipl.orq I 402.405.9425been entrusted to us as a gift of life, and we have been asked from the beginning to

be its stewards. The people of faith in Nebraska support strong Carbon Pollution Standards for power plants—because we know that what God promised us is a world that is powered by love and justice. Thank you.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7359

RASHID QAWI AL-AMIN, a/k/a Donald T. Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G. DEEDS; M. SPRADLING; D. CROWELL; Y. ELSWICK,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-648-R)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 20, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rashid Qawi Al-Amin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Al-Amin v. Deeds, No. CA-96-648-R (W.D. VA.

Aug. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# L_2018073EN.01003101.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 157/2016

of 8 July 2016

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement (2018/378)

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 amending Annexes II and III to Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 amending Annexes II and III to Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of water intended for human consumption (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 7a (Council Directive 98/83/EC) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 L 1787: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 6).’. |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 L 1787: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1787 of 6 October 2015 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 6).’.

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/1787 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**Exhibit 13.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S.SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of FibriaCelulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Evandro César Camillo Coura, Officer for Control andRisk Management, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(i)             the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Evandro César  Camillo Coura          |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name Evandro César Camillo Coura          |   |
|   | Title: Officer for Control and Risk Management |   |

 

Dated:  April 30, 2010

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 15.4

[Letterhead of King & Wood]

June 30, 2009

NetEase.com, Inc.

26/F, SP Tower D

Tsinghua Science Park Building 8

No. 1 Zhongguancun East Road

Haidian District, Beijing 100084, Peoples Republic of China

Dear Sirs,

Re: Consent of Peoples Republic of China Counsel

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Enforcement of Civil Liabilities in the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 of NetEase.com, Inc. to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission in the month of June 2009.



|                 
|-----------------
|Very truly yours,
|                 
|/s/ King & Wood  
|King & Wood
OIL AND GAS IN AZERBAIJAN

----
### §1153. Aggravation

A preexisting injury or disease will be considered to have been aggravated by active military, naval, air, or space service, where there is an increase in disability during such service, unless there is a specific finding that the increase in disability is due to the natural progress of the disease.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1124, §353; renumbered §1153, Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title IX, §926(a)(15), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "air, or space service" for "or air service".

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 353 of this title as this section.
### §601. Applicability

This chapter applies to—

(1) members of a uniformed service who are on active duty (other than for training) or who are on a retired list of that service; and

(2) members of the Fleet Reserve or Fleet Marine Corps Reserve.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 483.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 601 | 37:351. | June 21, 1950, ch. 342, §1, 64 Stat. 249. |

The words "on active duty (other than for training)" are substituted for the words "on the active . . . list" to conform to longstanding administrative construction, and because there is no "active list" in the case of many of the uniformed services named, but only for certain regular component of those services, e.g., the "Regular Army" and the "Regular Air Force". The words "a retired list of that service" are substituted for the words "retired list", since there is more than one retired list for many of the services named. (See sections 1376, 3966, and 8966 of title 10, for example.) The words "members of the Reserve components of the respective services entitled to Federal pay either on the active or any retired list of said services" are omitted as covered by clause (1), since members of the reserve components are members of the uniformed services concerned. The word "transferred" is omitted as surplusage.
**EXPROPRIATION NOWCLOSER TO REALITY**

** **

JANUARY 3, 2000

 

FM AMEMBASSY MINSK

                            

 1. ON NOVEMBER 23, 1999, BELARUSIANPRESIDENT

 ALEXANDER LUKASHENKO SIGNED DECREE NO40, WHICH ENABLES

 HIM TO NATIONALIZE THE PROPERTY OF ANYINDIVIDUAL

 (INCLUDING HIS BUSINESS) IF THEPRESIDENT DECIDES THAT

 THIS INDIVIDUAL HAS CAUSED DAMAGE(LOSSES) TO THE

 BELARUSIAN STATE.  THE DECREE IS EQUALLY APPLICABLE TO

 BELARUSIANS, FOREIGNERS AND INDIVIDUALSWITHOUT ANY

 CITIZENSHIP. 

 

 2. UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEYPOINTS OF THE

 DECREE FOLLOWS: IN ORDER TO ENSURECOMPLETE COMPENSATION

 FOR THE LOSSES (DAMAGE) SUFFERED BY THESTATE... THIS DECREE

 RULES THAT:

 

 A. PRESIDENT OF BELARUS MAY DECIDE TOTRANSFER INTO THE

 OWNERSHIP OF BELARUS A PROPERTY, WHICHIS OWNED

 (ADMINISTERED, OPERATIONALLY RULED) BY:

 

 --AN INDIVIDUAL, WHO HAS CAUSED DAMAGE(LOSSES) TO THE

 STATE;

 --LEGAL ENTITY(IES) ESTABLISHED BY THISINDIVIDUAL;

 --LEGAL ENTITY(IES) ESTABLISHED BY THELEGAL

 ENTITY(IES), WHOSE PROPERTY IS TO BETRANSFERRED INTO

 THE OWNERSHIP OF BELARUS.

 

 B. PROPERTY, TRANSFERRED INTO THEOWNERSHIP OF BELARUS

 WILL BE ADMINISTERED BY THE MINISTRY OFSTATE PROPERTY

 AND PRIVATIZATION, UNLESS OTHERWISEESTABLISHED BY THE

 PRESIDENT OF BELARUS.

 

 C. NOT TRANSFERRED INTO THE OWNERSHIP OFBELARUS IS THE

 PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT LIABLE FORCONFISCATION UNDER

 THE COURT DECISION, AS WELL AS PROPERTYCOSTING LESS

 THAN TWENTY MINIMUM WAGES (APPROXIMATELYUSD 40).

 

 D. PROPERTY TRANSFERRED INTO THEOWNERSHIP OF BELARUS

 (ITS MONEY EQUIVALENT) MAY BE RETURNEDTO THE ORIGINAL

 OWNER IN THE FOLLOWING CASES:

 

 --COMPLETE COMPENSATION OF THE CAUSEDDAMAGE (LOSSES);

 --COURT'S ACQUITTAL.

 

 

 3. THE VAGUE DEFINITION OF 'DAMAGE' INTHIS

 DECREE, COUPLED WITH THE ABSENCE OF ANINDENPENDET

 JUDICIARY, COULD ALLOW THE LUKASHENKOREGIME TO

 UNILATERALY EXPROPRIATE THE PROPERTY OFANY OPPONENT OR

 COMPETITOR WHICH IS PERCEIVED TO BE ATHREAT.  POST

 WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THEIMPLEMENTATION OF THIS

 DECREE.