alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 9701
Editorial Note: At 73 FR 58435, Oct. 7, 2008, the application of subpart C to part 9701 was rescinded.

§ 9701.302 Coverage. ( a ) This subpart applies to eligible DHS employees in the categories listed in paragraph (b) of this section, subject to a determination by the Secretary or designee under § 9701.102(b).
( b ) The following employees are eligible for coverage under this subpart: ( 1 ) Employees who would otherwise be covered by the General Schedule pay system established under 5 U.S.C. chapter 53, subchapter III;
( 2 ) Employees who would otherwise be covered by a prevailing rate system established under 5 U.S.C. chapter 53, subchapter IV;
( 3 ) Employees in senior-level (SL) and scientific or professional (ST) positions who would otherwise be covered by 5 U.S.C. 5376; and
( 4 ) Members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) who would otherwise be covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 53, subchapter VIII, subject to § 9701.102(d).
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rainer Rotthaeuser, the Chief Executive Officer of
Exploration Drilling International Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/
      Rainer Rotthaeuser         
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | RAINER ROTTHAEUSER                   
| |        |                                      
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | May 20, 2008                         
| |        |                                      





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
§ 919.740 Are suspension proceedings formal? ( a ) Suspension proceedings are conducted in a fair and informal manner. The suspending official may use flexible procedures to allow you to present matters in opposition. In so doing, the suspending official is not required to follow formal rules of evidence or procedure in creating an official record upon which the official will base a final suspension decision.
( b ) You as a respondent or your representative must submit any documentary evidence you want the suspending official to consider.
B.C.D. 95-81A - RAILTEX TRAC COMPANY, INC. - COVERAGE UNDER THE

RAILROAD UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACT

This order modifies B.C.D. 95-81 with respect to the coverage of

RailTex Trac Company, Inc. under the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act. In B.C.D. 95-81, issued September 6, 1995, RailTex 

Trac Company, Inc. was determined to be an employer under the

Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts 

effective April 1, 1991. RailTex Trac Company, Inc. has requested

that coverage under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

commence June 1, 1995. In support of this request, RailTex Trac

Company has stated that it believed in good faith that it was

covered under the Federal/State unemployment compensation system 

and that it had paid all taxes under that system up to June 1,

1995 .

Based on our review of the evidence in this case, the Board has

determined to grant RailTex Trac Company's request. Accordingly, 

it is the Board's determination that RailTex Trac Company, Inc.

became an employer under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

effective June 1, 1995. Notwithstanding this determination, the

Board will consider employees of RailTex Trac Company, Inc. to have

covered service and remuneration commencing on or after January 1,

1994, for purposes of sickness benefits and unemployment insurance 

benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act if the

employees would not be qualified for comparable benefits under the

Federal/State unemployment compensation system based on such

service and remuneration.

Glen L. Bower

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1996-21

BA # 9841
§ 890.110 Enrollment reconciliation. ( a ) Each employing office must report to each carrier or its surrogate on a quarterly basis the names of the individuals who are enrolled in the carrier's plan in a format and containing such information as required by OPM.
( b ) The carrier must compare the data provided with its own enrollment records. When the carrier finds in its total enrollment records individuals whose names do not appear in the report from the employing office of record, the carrier must request the employing office to provide the documentation necessary to resolve the discrepancy.
[63 FR 59459, Nov. 4, 1998; 63 FR 64761, Nov. 23, 1998]
| a. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Kuhlman Company, Inc. for the                quarter                ended October 28, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b. | information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Kuhlman Company,                Inc.                                                                                    |

|                                      |                                   |                                |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                   |
| Date: December              22, 2006 |                                   | /s/ Scott              Kuhlman |
|                                      | By                Scott Kuhlman        |
|                                      | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
### §300105. Powers

(a) General.—The corporation may—

(1) adopt policies and regulations;

(2) adopt, alter, and destroy a seal;

(3) own and dispose of property to carry out the purposes of the corporation;

(4) accept gifts, devises, and bequests of property to carry out the purposes of the corporation;

(5) sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States; and

(6) do any other act necessary to carry out this chapter and promote the purposes of the corporation.

(b) Designation.—The corporation is designated as the organization authorized to act in matters of relief under the treaties of Geneva, August 22, 1864, July 27, 1929, and August 12, 1949.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1492; Pub. L. 110–26, §7, May 11, 2007, 121 Stat. 108.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 300105 | 36:2 (1st sentence words between 2d comma and 3d semicolon and after 4th semicolon). | Jan. 5, 1905, ch. 23, §2 (1st sentence words between 2d comma and 3d semicolon and after 4th semicolon), 33 Stat. 600; May 8, 1947, ch. 50, §3, 61 Stat. 81. |

Section

In subsection (a)(1), the word "adopt" is substituted for "ordain and establish" for consistency in the revised title. The words "not inconsistent with the laws of the United States of America or any State thereof" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (a)(2), the words "adopt, alter, and destroy a seal" are substituted for "adopt a seal and the same to alter and destroy at pleasure" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (a)(3), the words "own and dispose of property" are substituted for "to have and to hold such real and personal estate as shall be deemed advisable and to dispose of the same" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (a)(4), the word "property" is substituted for "real and personal estate" for clarity and consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (a)(6), the word "things" is omitted as included in "act". The words "carry out this chapter" are substituted for "carry into effect the provisions of sections 1, 2 to 6, 8, and 9 of this title" for clarity and because under 36:1a the corporation existing under those sections continued under the source provisions restated in the revised chapter.

In subsection (b), the words "treaties of Geneva, August 22, 1864, July 27, 1929, and August 12, 1949" are substituted for "said treaties" for clarity and consistency in the chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 110–26 substituted "policies" for "bylaws".
EXIM Expands Russia Coverage

----
Board Coverage Decision

2015-27

No Decision Published

Decision issued 11/06/2015

Indiana Southern Railroad, LLC (Name Change)

BA # 5334
### §1111. Presumption of sound condition

For the purposes of section 1110 of this title, every veteran shall be taken to have been in sound condition when examined, accepted, and enrolled for service, except as to defects, infirmities, or disorders noted at the time of the examination, acceptance, and enrollment, or where clear and unmistakable evidence demonstrates that the injury or disease existed before acceptance and enrollment and was not aggravated by such service.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1119, §311; renumbered §1111 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), (c)(1), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Pub. L. 102–83, §5(a), renumbered section 311 of this title as this section.

Pub. L. 102–83, §5(c)(1), substituted "1110" for "310".
Presidential Documents

201 

Federal Register 

Vol. 84, No. 15 

Wednesday, January 23, 2019 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2019–07 of January 16, 2019 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 303 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 303 of the Defense 

Production Act of 1950, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’) (50 U.S.C. 4533), I hereby 

determine, pursuant to section 303(a)(5) of the Act, that the domestic capability for advanced manufacturing techniques for the production of chemicals 

in munitions is essential to the national defense. 

Without Presidential action under section 303 of the Act, United States 

industry cannot reasonably be expected to provide the capability for advanced 

manufacturing techniques for the production of chemicals in munitions adequately and in a timely manner. Further, purchases, purchase commitments, 

or other action pursuant to section 303 of the Act are the most cost-effective, 

expedient, and practical alternative method for meeting the need for this 

critical capability. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 16, 2019 

[FR Doc. 2019–00097 

Filed 1–22–19; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 5001–06–P 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-18-012: NIDDK 
Program Projects in Diabetes and Obesity.
    Date: February 6, 2019.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Najma S. Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
Room 7349, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 
594-8894, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1b3b4b6a4bcbf91bfb8b5b5baffbfb8b9ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="593b3c3e2c34371937303d3d3277373031773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 24, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00270 Filed 1-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1609 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1609

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, as the ``Admiral 
                  Donald Davis Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2003

Mr. Graves (for himself, Mr. Skelton, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Akin, Mr. Clay, 
  Mr. Blunt, Mr. Hulshof, Ms. McCarthy of Missouri, and Mr. Gephardt) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, as the ``Admiral 
                  Donald Davis Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMIRAL DONALD DAVIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, and 
known as the Brookfield Main Office, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Admiral Donald Davis Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Admiral 
Donald Davis Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 839.1112 If I elect to change my retirement coverage under the FERCCA, can I retroactively revoke the waiver of military retired pay I made at retirement?

Yes, you may retroactively change your decision regarding waiver of your military retired pay.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2140 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2140

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
amounts received as damages (including punitive damages) on account of 
                          age discrimination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
amounts received as damages (including punitive damages) on account of 
                          age discrimination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED AS DAMAGES (INCLUDING 
              PUNITIVE DAMAGES) ON ACCOUNT OF AGE DISCRIMINATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to compensation for injuries or 
sickness) is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (4), 
by striking the period at the end of paragraph (5) and inserting ``; 
and'', and by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) the amount of any damages (including punitive 
        damages) received (whether by suit or agreement and whether as 
        lump sums or as periodic payments) on account of age 
        discrimination.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to amounts received after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
L-96-13-*

APR 2 51996

TO Peter A. Larson 

Chief Financial Officer

FROM Catherine C. Cook 

General Counsel

SUBJECT : Interest on Trust Funds Transfers

This is in response to your memorandum dated April 11,1996, wherein you stated 

that the supplemental annuity taxes refunded under the settlement agreement 

between the IRS and several railroads were improperly charged to the Railroad 

Retirement Account (RR Account), the Social Security Equivalent Benefit Account 

(SSEB Account), and the Railroad Supplemental Account (RRS Account) rather than

to the RRS Account alone. According to your memorandum the RRS Account owes 

the RR Account $24,432,090 and the SSEB Account $25,220,103 in principal and 

interest erroneously charged to the RR Account and SSEB Account.

You ask whether the amount owed by the RRS Account to the SSEB Account should 

also be repaid with interest. There is no question that the principal should be repaid 

in the case of an erroneous payment from the SSEB Account rather than the RRS 

Account. See Legal Opinion L-95-17. It is also my opinion that the amount to be 

repaid to the SSEB Account should include interest. If the amount erroneously paid 

out from the SSEB Account rather than the RRS Account had been left in the SSEB 

Account, this amount would have been invested in debt obligations of the United 

States. Because of the erroneous charge by Treasury, the SSEB Account was 

deprived of these investments. The RRS Account, on the other hand, has been 

unjustly enriched by the interest earned on the funds borrowed from the RR Account 

that were supposed to be used to pay the tax refunds. In my opinion, the funds 

improperly charged to the SSEB Account should be considered as having been 

invested by the RRS Account on behalf of the SSEB Account and the return of those 

funds to the SSEB Account should include the interest earned by those funds while 

credited to the RRS Account.

The above discussion would apply to the interest to be paid to the RR Account as

SABartholow:AA>Arfa:cmw/TRUSTFND.AAA
#### In the Matter of Motor Haulage Company, Inc., Petitioner, against Milo R. Maltbie et al., Constituting the Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Respondents.

*1041Crapser, Heffernan and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents in memorandum, in which Hill, P. J., concurs. Bliss, J. (dissenting). Ninety-five per cent of this company’s business is contract work. The remaining five per cent might possibly be classified as that of a common carrier. Under these circumstances this remaining five per cent is merely incidental to the great bulk of petitioner’s business which is that of a contract carrier. It surely does not make a common carrier out of a company which is not one. This company reserved the right at all times to fix its own prices by contract and to decide what business to accept and what to reject.