alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REMARKS OF NRC CHAIRMAN GREGORY B. JACZKO AT 

COMMISSION BRIEFING ON DECOMMISSIONING FUNDING 

 Good morning. The Commission will hear today from both staff and external stakeholders 

on decommissioning funding issues. 

 Decommissioning is an issue that really demonstrates the breadth of the NRC’s regulatory 

work. Our responsibilities in this area start with making sure that our licensees are setting aside 

adequate funds or providing other appropriate financial assurance while they are operating to cover 

their decommissioning costs after they shut down. Our responsibilities don’t end until decades later 

once licensed operations have ceased and the agency oversees the actual cleanup efforts at the site 

or facility. 

 The agency requires licensees to provide detailed reports at least once every two years on 

the financial investments and instruments that they have set aside to cover their future 

decommissioning costs. During the economic downturn, we have seen that licensees have 

experienced some challenges in maintaining sufficient decommissioning funds. Overall though, I 

believe that the experience of the last two years has shown that our regulatory approach is generally 

sound. Most of our licensees maintained adequate funds, and most of those who experienced 

shortfalls already have addressed them. 

 During our first panel, we will hear from several stakeholders – including state, public 

advocacy, and licensee representatives – who will provide several different perspectives on the 

funding challenges that some of our licensees have experienced. We will then hear from the staff on 

our second panel this morning. The staff will provide a general overview of our decommissioning 

funding regulations, review some of the challenges our licensees have experienced in meeting their 

financial assurance requirements, and discuss the proposed changes to our guidance and rules. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-034 February 23, 2010
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 0-30197

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of KIK Technology International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
M. Knooihuizen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2008                         By: /s/ Donald Dean
      --------------                            --------------------------------
                                                Donald Dean
                                                Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of KIK Technology International,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
Dean,  Chief  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934;  and (2) the  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2008                         By: /s/ Donald Dean
      --------------                            --------------------------------
                                                Donald Dean
                                                Chief Accounting Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology International, Inc. and will furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2018073EN.01002701.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 152/2016

of 8 July 2016

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2018/374]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1605 of 12 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1569/2007 establishing a mechanism for the determination of equivalence of accounting standards applied by third country issuers of securities pursuant to Directives 2003/71/EC and 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1605 of 12 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1569/2007 establishing a mechanism for the determination of equivalence of accounting standards applied by third country issuers of securities pursuant to Directives 2003/71/EC and 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 29e (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1569/2007) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 1605: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1605 of 12 June 2015 (OJ L 249, 25.9.2015, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 1605: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1605 of 12 June 2015 (OJ L 249, 25.9.2015, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1605 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 249, 25.9.2015, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2017134EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol (2015) amending the Annex to the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft

The Protocol (2015) amending the Annex to the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft will enter into force on 26 May 2017.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                           PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION

       AMENDMENT TO THE NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT ("AMENDMENT")

         THIS AMENDMENT TO NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (this
"Amendment") dated as of May 18, 2001, is made by and between Peabody Energy
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and the undersigned employee
of the Company or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates (the "Optionee").

         WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.7 of the Option Agreement, the Company
and the Optionee have the power to amend the Option Agreement if they deem it
appropriate;

         WHEREAS, concomitantly herewith, that certain Stockholders Agreement
dated as of May 19, 1998, among the Company, the Optionee and other parties
thereto (the "Stockholders Agreement") is amended to clarify certain rights
granted thereunder to Management Investors and their Permitted Transferees (as
such terms are defined in the Stockholders Agreement); and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee desire to amend the Option
Agreement to reflect certain additional changes agreed upon by the parties to
the Stockholders Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Option Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

                                       I.

         Section 3.4(c) of the Option Agreement, as previously amended, is
further amended by deleting subsection 3.4(c)(i) in its entirety and replacing
it with the following:

         "(i) upon completion of an IPO on or before July 31, 2001, at least 50%
         of the shares subject to the Superperformance Option I shall vest and
         the balance shall vest in accordance with the IRR chart set forth in
         Section 3.3 above".

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered by
the parties hereto.

                                    PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION

                                        By:    ________________________________

                                        Title: VP - Human Resources
                                               ________________________________

                                               Optionee Signature
                                               ________________________________

<PAGE>

                                                    Optionee Name (Please Print)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 31, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51113

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EUDELIO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-650-3-AML

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Eudelio Rodriguez appeals from his sentence for conspiracy

to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Rodriguez asserts that his

waiver of appeal is invalid because the Government violated the

plea agreement. This court reviews de novo whether a waiver of

appeal bars an appeal. United States v. Baymon, 312 F.3d 725,

727 (5th Cir. 2002).
No. 03-51113

-2-

Rodriguez contends that the Government violated its

agreement by supporting the probation officer’s recommendation to

deny him credit for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G.

3E1.1(a). This lacks merit because the record shows that the

Government promised not to oppose the adjustment only if the

probation officer recommended it in the presentence report. At

Rodriguez’s sentencing hearing, this was made clear. Thus

Rodriguez’s reliance on United States v. Keresztury, 293 F.3d

750, 755-57 (5th Cir. 2002), is misplaced.

The record shows that Rodriguez knowingly and voluntarily

waived his right to appeal his sentence. See United States v.

Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United

States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261, 269 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly,

Rodriguez’s waiver of appeal is enforceable and bars the present

appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—LOAN GUARANTEE FOR MULTIFAMILY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–95, §5(d)(1), (2)(A), Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 918, redesignated subchapter VI of chapter 37 of this title as this subchapter and struck out "FOR HOMELESS VETERANS" after "HOUSING" in subchapter heading.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - 33 CFR Chapter I 
          - [USCG-2004-19615] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Request for public comments; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Coast Guard published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 3, 2004, requesting comments on a petition for rulemaking from the City of Fall River. That document contained an incorrect docket number for the submission of comments.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        If you have questions on this notice, please call Commander John Cushing at 202-267-1043, or e-mail                         *JCushing@comdt.uscg.mil.*                         If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, please call Ms. Andrea M. Jenkins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-0271.                     

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 3, 2004, in FR Doc. 04-24454, on page                               ( print page 65556)                            63979, the docket number is incorrect. The docket number is corrected to read (USCG-2004-19615) each place that it appears.                     

Dated: November 8, 2004. 

David L. Nichols, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of Regulations, and Administrative Law. 

[FR Doc. 04-25254 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No.: 20-23443-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES

MAURICIO CERPAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Acting Commissioner for Social Security

Administration,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Alicia M. Otazo-Reyes’s

Report and Recommendation (the “Report”). [ECF No. 28]. On August 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed a

Complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

(the “Commissioner”) denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits. [ECF No. 

1]. The matter was referred to Judge Otazo-Reyes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for a ruling 

on all pretrial, non-dispositive motions and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive 

motions. [ECF No. 2]. On June 16, 2022, Judge Otazo-Reyes issued her Report recommending that 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 25] be denied, the Commissioner’s Motion 

for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 26] be granted, and that the Commissioner’s decision be 

affirmed. Neither party has timely objected to the Report.

A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which 

objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings 

that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see 

Case 1:20-cv-23443-DPG Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific 

objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint 

Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc., 

208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). 

The Court finds no clear error with Judge Otazo-Reyes’s well-reasoned analysis and 

agrees that the Commissioner’s decision should be affirmed.

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Judge Otazo-Reyes’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 28] is AFFIRMED 

AND ADOPTED and incorporated into this Order by reference.

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 25] is DENIED.

(3) The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 26] is 

GRANTED.

(4) The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED. 

(5) This action is CLOSED for administrative purposes.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 18th day of July, 2022. 

________________________________

DARRIN P. GAYLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-23443-DPG Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/18/2022 Page 2 of 2
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2152

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend

for an additional 5 years the special immigrant religious

worker program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR XX EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT RELI2 GIOUS WORKER PROGRAM.

3 Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and

4 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘2003,’’ each place it appears and inserting

6 ‘‘2008,’’.

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

8 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect

9 on October 1, 2003.

Passed the House of Representatives September 17,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2152

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to

extend for an additional 5 years the special immigrant religious worker program.
#### Ebling Brewing Company v. Hermine Peter.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON 

PROPOSED ENFORCEMENT POLICY REVISIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a proposed major 

revision to its Enforcement Policy which will more appropriately address NRC-regulated 

activities and reflect current and future agency work. 

The Enforcement Policy proposes to include fines related to the Yucca Mountain highlevel waste repository and gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facilities, and modify fines for 

uranium conversion facilities. It also adds discussion of enforcement issues associated with 

combined licenses for the proposed new reactors and the construction phase of proposed fuel 

facilities as well as recently publicized requirements in the safeguards and security area. 

The NRC’s Enforcement Policy sets out guidance for potential penalties and actions in 

response to apparent violations of NRC requirements. It encourages prompt identification and 

comprehensive correction of violations. 

The draft will soon be available on the NRC’s Web site at www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html ADAMS ML082520457. The NRC welcomes public comments from interested 

parties including public interest groups, states, members of the public and the regulated industry 

on the proposed Policy for 60 days from publication of a “Notice of Availability” in the Federal 

Register, expected shortly. 

Comments may be submitted by either accessing the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at 

www.regulations.gov and with docket ID: NRC-2008-0497 or by mailing comments to Michael 

T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking, Directives and Editing Branch, Mail Stop T6-D59, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555-0001. 

For further information contact Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement, email 

Doug.Starkey@nrc.gov or phone 301-415-3456. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-168 September 15, 2008