alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC MEETING APRIL 23 IN HOMESTEAD, FLA., TO DISCUSS 

REVIEW PROCESS FOR EXPECTED NEW REACTOR APPLICATION 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting in Homestead, Fla., 

on Thursday, April 23, to discuss how the agency will review an expected Combined License 

(COL) application for two new reactors at the Turkey Point site, about 25 miles south of Miami. 

The prospective applicant, Florida Power & Light, has told the NRC it intends to apply later this 

year for a license to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at the site. 

 “The NRC is currently reviewing several applications for new reactors, and we want 

communities located near potential new reactor sites to know what’s being proposed,” said 

David Matthews, Director of the Division of New Reactor Licensing in the NRC’s Office of 

New Reactors. “We want residents around Turkey Point to understand what we review and how 

they can participate, because the public can provide valuable information during the process.” 

 The NRC will hold the meeting in the Palm Room at the Keys Gate Golf Club, 2300 

Palm Drive in Homestead, from 7 p.m. until 9 p.m. NRC staff presentations will describe the 

overall Combined License review process, which includes safety and environmental assessments, 

as well as how the public can participate in the process. The NRC will host an open house for an 

hour prior to the meeting so members of the public have the opportunity to talk informally with 

agency staff. 

 A COL, if issued, provides authorization from the NRC to construct and, with conditions, 

operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site and in accordance with laws and regulations. 

More information on the NRC’s new reactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Web 

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

 The AP1000 is a Westinghouse-designed 1,100 MWe pressurized-water reactor the NRC 

certified in 2006. The agency is currently reviewing a Westinghouse application, submitted in 

May 2007, to amend the certified design. More information regarding the review is available on 

the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/design-cert/amendedap1000.html. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-063 April 7, 2009
#### Don Jesse NEAL, Appellant, v. George BECKSTEAD, Sheriff of Salt Lake County; and Marcel Graham, Warden of Utah State Prison, Appellees.

No. 4934.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 22, 1954.

Carle Whitehead, Denver, Colo. (David I. Shapiro, New York City, Billy Hulsey, Salt Lake City, Utah, and Herbert Monte Levy, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Walter L. Budge, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Utah (E. R. Callister, Atty. Gen., State of Utah, on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON, HUXMAN, MURRAH, and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On a consideration of the record in the' instant case and the opinion of the Supreme Court of Utah in State v. Neal, 1 Utah 2d 122, 262 P.2d 756, certiorari denied, 347 U.S. 963, 74 S.Ct. 714, May 3, 1954, the court is of the opinion that under the law of Utah the matters complained of resulted in no prejudice or injury to Neal and that upon an appraisal of the totality of the facts in the case, Neal was not denied due process of law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

The order denying a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

It is further ordered that the stay heretofore granted in this case shall continue in effect until midnight, Saturday, June 26, 1954; and that the request for an extension of such stay be denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
22, 2010


/s/
      B.J. SparksB.J.
      SparksChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 23.3

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors

HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-134419 and No. 333-134419-01) on Form S-3 of HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I of our attestation report dated March 3, 2008 with respect to HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc.’s (the Company) assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by receivables in the HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I program, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.  Management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Company’s activities with respect to HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I.  Our attestation report appears in the December 31, 2007 annualreport on Form 10-K of HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I.  

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 24, 2008
§ 892.208 Can I decrease my enrollment type at any time? If you are participating in premium conversion you may decrease your FEHB enrollment type under either of the following circumstances: ( a ) *During the annual open season.* A decrease in enrollment type made during the annual open season takes effect on the 1st day of the first pay period that begins in the next year.
( b ) *Within 60 days after you have a qualifying life event.* A decrease in enrollment type made because of a qualifying life event takes effect on the first day of the first pay period that begins after the date your employing office receives your appropriate request. Your change in enrollment must be consistent with and correspond to your qualifying life event. For example, if you get divorced and have no dependent children, changing to self only would be consistent with that qualifying life event. As another example, if both you and your spouse are Federal employees, and your youngest dependent turns age 26, changing from a self and family to a self plus one or two self only enrollments would be consistent and appropriate for that event.
( c ) If you are subject to a court or administrative order as discussed in § 890.301(g)(3), you may not decrease enrollment type in a way that eliminates coverage of a child identified in the order as long as the court or administrative order is still in effect and you have at least one child identified in the order who is still eligible under the FEHB Program, unless you provide documentation to your agency that you have other coverage for your child or children. See also §§ 892.207 and 892.209. If you are subject to a court or administrative order as discussed in § 890.301(g)(3), you may not change your enrollment to self plus one as long as the court or administrative order is still in effect and you have more than one child identified in the order who is still eligible under the FEHB Program, unless you provide documentation to your agency that you have other coverage for your children. See also §§ 892.207 and 892.209.
[80 FR 55739, Sept. 17, 2015]
#### Ambrose J. McNamara, Plaintiff, v. Herbert S. Powell et al., Defendants.

*1062Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
§ 870.1005 Premiums. ( a ) Government contributions and employee withholdings required under subpart D of this part are paid from the funds provided under section 599C(e) of Pub. L. 101-513 (104 Stat. 2035).
( b ) If an individual isn't insured for the full pay period, premiums are paid only for the days he/she is actually insured. The daily premium is the monthly premium multiplied by 12 and divided by 365.
( c ) OPM may accept the payments required by this section in advance from a State Department appropriation, if necessary to fund the 12-month period of coverage beginning the earlier of: ( 1 ) The day after sanctions or hostilities end; or
( 2 ) The day after the individual's hostage status ends.
( d ) OPM will place any funds received under paragraph (c) of this section in an account set up for that purpose. OPM will make the deposit required under 5 U.S.C. 8714 from the account when the appropriate pay period occurs.
[62 FR 48731, Sept. 17, 1997; 62 FR 52181, Oct. 6, 1997]
#### Anna Farrell, Defendant in Error, v. William J. Farrell et al., Plaintiffs in Error.

Gen. No. 19,154.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John K. Pbindeville, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Anna Farrell against William J. Farrell, Mrs. Mary Farrell, Miss Mary Farrell and Annie Gallagher in replevin to recover possession of certain furniture. The bailiff was unable to obtain possession of the goods, and thereafter the defendants entered their appearance and the court gave leave to plaintiff to file a statement of claim in trover. No such statement was filed, but the parties treated the action as one of trover. The jury found defendants guilty and assessed plaintiff’s damages at three hundred and fifty dollars. To reverse a judgment entered on the verdict, defendants prosecute error.

Fred A. Rathje and Charles E. Loy, for plaintiffs in error.

*122Litzinger, McGurn & Reid, for defendant in error; Leonard C. Reid, of counsel.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Municipal Court op Chicago, § *26*
      ***
      *—sufficiency of transcript.*Statements in transcript of the record made by the clerk of the Municipal Court *held*conflicting and attention called thereto that greater care may be observed by the clerk of that court. The transcript states that “On the 2nd day of November, A. D. 1912, a certain affidavit for replevin was filed * * * in words and figures following, to wit.” Then follows an affidavit purporting to have been sworn to November 18, 1912, before one of plaintiff’s attorneys. The transcript then states that “On the 8th day of November, 1912, a certain replevin writ was issued out of the office of the clerk of said Court.” Then follows a replevin writ dated the 2nd day of November, 1912, on which a return of the bailiff is indorsed, stating that the writ was received November 2, read to one of the defendants November 4 and returned November 8, 1912.

2. Trover and conversion, § *39*
      ***
      *—when evidence insufficient to sustain judgment against joint defendants.*In an action of trover against several defendants to recover for certain furniture, *held*that a judgment against the defendants was erroneous as to one of the defendants and must be reversed as to all, there being no evidence to show that such defendant had possession of any of the furniture in question at the time the demand was made or at any other time, nor that she ever claimed to he entitled to possession of or to have any right in the property.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
Section 1350 Certification

Exhibit 32.1

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2007

 

 

|   | By:    | /s/ William D. Sullivan                      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   | William D. Sullivan

Chief Executive Officer |
### §240111. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers or agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1490.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 240111 | 36:3109. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–584, §9, 98 Stat. 3098. |

Section
**Exhibit 23.3**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-74501 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 33-91890,33-18996, 33-18997, 33-65768, 333-79093 and 333-43872 on Form S-8 of Armstrong Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Armstrong Venture as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,and the related consolidated statements of income, partners’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of ArmstrongHoldings, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 23, 2005
# L_2018087EN.01000101.xml

| 3.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Arab Republic of Egypt in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA)

The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Arab Republic of Egypt setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Arab Republic of Egypt in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA) (1), signed on 27 October 2017, has, in accordance with Article 4(2) thereof, entered into force on 15 March 2018.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 316, 1.12.2017, p. 9.

1

---
No. III-10-003 

Contacts: 

Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662 

Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663 

 January 25, 2010 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Web site: www.nrc.gov

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532 

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT 

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Thomas 

Hartman as the new Resident Inspector at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant 

in Perry, Ohio, roughly 35 miles northeast of Cleveland. 

Hartman joined the NRC in Region III as a reactor engineer in 

2009. Prior to joining the agency, he served more than six years in the 

U.S. Navy as a Machinist Mate aboard the aircraft carrier USS Carl 

Vinson. Hartman graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute with a 

bachelor’s of science degree in nuclear engineering. 

“Thomas Hartman is an excellent inspector with a firm commitment to safety. He will 

help the NRC fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by helping ensure the 

Perry plant operates at the high standards set by the NRC,” Region III Administrator Mark 

Satorius said. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They 

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major 

work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Hartman joins Senior Resident 

Inspector Mark Marshfield at the plant. Both can be reached at (440) 259-3610. 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Letter Agreement, executed December 23, 2003



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 BSB Bancorp, Inc. 
  
 William M. Le Beau 
 BSB Bank & Trust Company 
 58-68 Exchange Street 
 Binghamton, New York 
  
 Dear Bill: 
  
 This letter agreement is to confirm the additional agreements, arrangements
and understandings relating to the payments that you will become entitled to receive in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and between Partners Trust Financial
Group, Inc., SBU Bank, Wicked Acquisition Corporation, Partners Trust, MHC and BSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), dated December 23, 2003. The agreements, arrangement and understandings contained herein amend the Change of Control
Severance Agreement between you, the Company and BSB Bank & Trust Company, dated as of December 6, 2000 (the “COC Agreement”) and the Target Benefit Supplemental Retirement Benefit Agreement between BSB Bank & Trust Company and the
Executive, dated as of October 30, 2003 (the “SERP”). The commitments set forth in this letter agreement are subject to (i) the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and (ii) the limitations imposed on the
Company pursuant to Section 4.01 of the Disclosure Schedule to the Merger Agreement. To the extent the payments under Sections 1 and 2 of this letter agreement, when combined with the other payments to employees of the Company as permitted by
Section 4.01 of the Disclosure Schedule, exceed the limitation set forth in such Schedule, the payments under Sections 1 and 2 hereof shall be subject to reduction on a pro-rata basis. All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
given to them in the Merger Agreement. 
  
 1.
COC Agreement Payment. Immediately prior to the Closing Date, the Company shall make a lump sum cash payment to you equal to $683,100 in full satisfaction of the severance obligations under the COC Agreement. 
  
 2. SERP Payment. Immediately prior to the Closing
Date, the Company shall make a lump sum cash payment to the Executive in an amount equal to $601,841 in full satisfaction of the obligations under the SERP. 
  
 3. Section 280G Gross-Up Payment. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the provisions of Section 6
(“Section 280G Gross-Up Payment”) of the COC Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, as if restated herein in its entirety, in the event that any payments or distributions to you or for your benefit, whether paid or payable
hereunder or otherwise, are determined (in accordance with the terms of such Section 6) to be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The provisions of this Section 3 shall survive the
termination of the COC agreement. 
  
 Please sign below to
indicate your acknowledgment and acceptance of the agreements set forth herein. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Howard W. Sharp


	 Name: Howard W. Sharp

	 Title: Chief Executive Officer



  

			
	 Acknowledged and Accepted:

	
	 William M. Le Beau

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ William M. Le Beau
§ 919.505 Who uses the EPLS? ( a ) Federal agency officials use the *EPLS* to determine whether to enter into a transaction with a person, as required under § 919.430.
( b ) Participants also may, but are not required to, use the *EPLS* to determine if— ( 1 ) Principals of their transactions are excluded or disqualified, as required under § 919.320; or
( 2 ) Persons with whom they are entering into covered transactions at the next lower tier are excluded or disqualified.
( c ) The *EPLS* is available to the general public.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of
A4S Security, Inc., (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, each of
the undersigned Thomas Marinelli, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: September 1, 2005                          \s\ Thomas Marinelli
                                                  --------------------
                                                  Thomas Marinelli,
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


Dated: September 1, 2005                          \s\ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  Jeffrey G. McGonegal,
                                                  Chief Financial Officer





                                    * * * * *





A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §396. Recovery of penalties and forfeitures generally

All the penalties and forfeitures which may be incurred for offenses against title 48 of the Revised Statutes may be sued for, prosecuted, and recovered in such court, and be disposed of in such manner, as any penalties and forfeitures which may be incurred for offenses against the laws relating to the collection of duties, except when otherwise expressly prescribed.

(R.S. §4305.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title 48 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title", meaning title 48 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§4131 to 4305. For complete classification of R.S. §§4131 to 4305 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

R.S. §4305 derived from act Dec. 31, 1792, ch. 1, §29, 1 Stat. 298.