alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §130104. Governing body

(a) National Convention.—(1) The national convention is the supreme governing authority of the corporation.

(2) The national convention is composed of officers and elected representatives from the States and other local subdivisions of the corporation as provided in the constitution and bylaws. However, the form of government of the corporation must be representative of the membership at large and may not permit concentration of control in a limited number of members or in a self-perpetuating group not representative of the membership at large.

(3) The meetings of the national convention may be held in the District of Columbia or in any State, territory, or possession of the United States.

(b) Officers.—The titles, manner of selection, term of office, and duties of the officers are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1372.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130104(a) | 36:78e. | June 17, 1959, Pub. L. 86–47, §§6, 7, 73 Stat. 78. |
| 130104(b) | 36:78f. | |

Section

In subsection (a)(2), the words "several", "always", "thereof", and "the hands of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (a)(3), the words "State, territory, or possession of the United States" are substituted for "State or Territory" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
NRC TO DISCUSS PROCESS FOR REVIEW OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION 

FOR DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct two public meetings on 

Feb. 9, to discuss the agency’s review process for the license renewal application for the Diablo 

Canyon nuclear power plant, located near San Luis Obispo, Calif. 

The meetings will be held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Road, San Luis 

Obispo. The first session will begin at 1:30 p.m. and continue until 4:30 p.m., as necessary. The 

second session, which will offer the same presentations as the earlier one, will get under way at 

7 p.m. and continue until 10 p.m., as needed. 

Both meetings will begin with NRC staff presentations on how the license renewal 

review will be conducted. Following the presentations, attendees will be able to ask questions of 

the staff. 

The NRC will host an open house beginning one hour before each meeting during which 

people can talk informally with agency staff. 

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant has a 

term of 40 years. The license may be renewed for up to an additional 20 years if NRC 

requirements are met. 

The plant is located in Avila Beach, 12 miles from San Luis Obispo, Calif. The current 

operating licenses for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 expire on Nov. 2, 2024, 

and Aug. 26, 2025, respectively. The licensee, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., submitted the renewal 

application on Nov. 23, 2009, for Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2. The application is available on 

the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html. 

 

### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 

No. IV-010-002 

Contact: Victor Dricks (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding (817) 276-6519 

 January 28, 2010 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov
#### Art Color Printing Company, Appellant, v. Kable News Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

South Central Florida Railroad

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued status

of the South Central Florida Railroad (SCFR) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seq) (RUIA). The SCFR was ruled to be an

employer under the Acts administered by the Board effective May 30, 1990.

On September 16, 1994 the SCFR ceased operations. SCFR employees last

performed compensated service on September 16, 1994. Substantially all of the 

assets of the SCFR, which operated as a division of the Brandywine Valley Railroad

Company (B.A. 3342), were sold to the South Central Florida Express, Inc. (B.A. 

5554). This railroad took over the operations of the SCFR immediately after

September 16,1 994, as evidenced in Interstate Commerce Commission notice of

exemption, Finance Docket No. 32876, dated September 9, 1994.

In accordance with the information summarized above, it is the Board's determination

that the South Central Florida Railroad ceased being an employer under the RRA and

RUIA as of the close of business on September 16, 1994, the day employees were

last compensated.

Glen L. Bower

V. M.'Speakman, Jr.

/Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1995-47 BA # 5533
**EXHIBIT31.2****SECTION302 CERTIFICATION**I, Scott A. Pomeroy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media East LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors or (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 10, 2005 /s/ Scott A. Pomeroy   Scott A. Pomeroy   Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-3137

_____________________________

ERIC TIWIAN LEVINE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

September 10, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Tyler Kemper Payne, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 847.801 What information is in this subpart?

This subpart contains OPM's regulations on the procedures, eligibility requirements, and time limits for elections under 5 U.S.C. 8332(b)(17) and 5 U.S.C. 8411(b)(6).
Exhibit 11

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of W Candy, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Brian Shenkman, as Chief Executive Officer and as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

May 9, 2003       

By Brian Shenkman
/s/ Brian Shenkman

President, CEO, CFO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to W Candy, Inc. and will be retained by W Candy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-09-0038 - Periodic Assessment of the Activities of the Committee to Review Generic Requirements from June 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008

Accession Number: ML081550646

Date Released: Monday, March 23, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML081550671 - SECY-09-0038 - Periodic Assessment of the Activities of the Committee to Review Generic Requirements from June 1, 2007, through May 31, 2008 (5 page(s), 3/6/2009)
    - ML090150052 - SECY-09-0038 - Enclosure: Activities and Assessment of the Committee to Review Generic Requirements Between June 1, 2007, and May 31, 2008 (6 page(s), 3/6/2009)
    - ML081550665 - SECY-09-0038 - Attachment 1: Topics Formally Reviewed by the Committee to Review Generic Requirements Between June 1, 2007, and May 31, 2008 (1 page(s), 3/6/2009)
    - ML081550662 - SECY-09-0038 - Attachment 2: Topics Informally Reviewed by the Committee to Review Generic Requirements Between June 1, 2007, and May 31, 2008 (3 page(s), 3/6/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §1003. Assimilation of pay and allowances

Chapters 3 and 5 and sections 402 through 403b, 405, 414, 452, and 453 of this title apply equally to persons who are not serving as members of a uniformed service but whose pay or allowances, or both, are assimilated under law or a regulation prescribed under law, to the pay or allowances, or both, of commissioned officers, warrant officers, or enlisted members of any grade, rank, or rating in any uniformed service.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 490; Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VI, §631(f)(4)(A), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1465; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(a)(9), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1948; Pub. L. 117–263, div. A, title VI, §626(h)(8), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 2630.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1003 | 37:309. | Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, §509; restated May 19, 1952, ch. 310, §3, 66 Stat. 80. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "sections 402 through 403b, 405, 414, 452, and 453" for "sections 402–403b, 474–477, 479–481, and 414".

2013—Pub. L. 112–239, §1076(a)(9), made technical amendment to directory language of Pub. L. 112–81, §631(f)(4)(A). See 2011 Amendment note below.

2011—Pub. L. 112–81, §631(f)(4)(A), as amended by Pub. L. 112–239, §1076(a)(9), substituted "402–403b, 474–477" for "402–407" and "479–481" for "409–411".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2013 Amendment

Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1076(a), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1947, provided that the amendment made by section 1076(a)(9) is effective Dec. 31, 2011, and as if included in Pub. L. 112–81 as enacted.
----

**DAVID L. KAHN****ATTORNEY AT LAW****535 N. Hayworth Ave., #301****Los Angeles****,****CA********90048****Telephone: (323) 658-6771****Fax: (323) 651-5569**

February 11, 2004

Mr. Alan Atlas     Corporate Counsel     La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc. ("La Jolla")     7817 Herschel Avenue, Suite 200     La Jolla, CA 92037     By Fax: (858) 551-8779

Re: Clarification Letter to your October 20, 2003 Warrant to Purchase Common Stock of Magic Media Networks, Inc. ("Warrant”)

Dear Mr. Atlas:

This is to confirm our understanding that, notwithstanding anything in the Warrant to the contrary, if, and to the extent that, La Jolla's holdings of the common stock of Magic would result in La Jolla becoming subject to the provisions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by virtue of being the "beneficial owner" of more than ten percent (10%) of the then outstanding shares of Magic's common stock, then La Jolla shall not have the right, and Magic shall not have the obligation, to exercise any portion of such stock options as shall cause La Jolla to be deemed the "beneficial owner" of more than (9.9%) of the then outstanding shares of Magic's common stock.

If the foregoing clarification letter accurately states La Jolla's agreement with Magic as to La Jolla's Warrant rights, please sign and fax back to me a copy of this clarification letter.

Very truly yours,

David L. Kahn

Agreed to and accepted this ______ day of February, 2004:

La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.

By Alan L. Atlas, Corporate Counsel

cc: Mr. Scott Venters
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1898

_____________________________

LOUIS D. FERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

March 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Louis D. Fernandez petitions this court for a writ of habeas 

corpus seeking to vacate his conviction. Because the issues 

Fernandez raises in his petition could have been or were raised on 

direct appeal, we dismiss his petition as unauthorized. See Baker 

v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004). 

We also find that this petition is frivolous. We direct the Clerk 

of the Court to provide a certified copy of this opinion to the Florida 

Department of Corrections to be forwarded to the appropriate 

institution or facility for disciplinary procedures under the rules of 

the Department. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (providing that “[a] 

prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or 
2

malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal . . . or to have 

brought a frivolous or malicious collateral criminal proceeding . . . 

is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the 

Department of Corrections”).

Fernandez is warned that any future filings that this court 

determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of 

sanctions, including a prohibition against further pro se filings in 

this court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999) 

(“[A]ny citizen, including a citizen attacking his or her conviction, 

abuses the right to pro se access by filing repetitious and frivolous 

pleadings, thereby diminishing the ability of the courts to devote 

their finite resources to the consideration of legitimate claims.”).

DISMISSED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Louis D. Fernandez, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0142- Change in Staff Position Concrening Information in Plant-Specific Technical Specifications that Combined License Applicants Must Provide to Support Issuance of Combined Licenses

Accession Number: ML082520782

Date Released: Thursday, October 16, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML082520748 - SECY-08-0142- Change in Staff Position Concrening Information in Plant-Specific Technical Specifications that Combined License Applicants Must Provide to Support Issuance of Combined Licenses (6 page(s), 9/25/2008)
    - ML082520723 - SECY-08-0142- Enclosure:  Interim Staff Guidance on the Necessary Content of Plant-Specific Technical Specifications when a Combined License is Issued (5 page(s), 9/25/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40402 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE LUIS MEZA

- FLORES, also known as Jose Luis Meza , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 1396

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Meza

Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Meza

- Fl ores h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 16, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40402 Document: 00514240231 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/16/2017No. 17

- 40402

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40402 Document: 00514240231 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/16/2017
No. IV-10-012 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 

 April 9, 2010 

 E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING WITH NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a meeting with the Nebraska 

Public Power District on April 15 to discuss the status of the Independent Spent Fuel Storage 

Installation at the Cooper Nuclear Station. 

The Cooper plant has one boiling water reactor and is located 23 miles south of Nebraska 

City, Neb. 

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 1 p.m. in the NRC’s 

Region IV office, 612 East Lamar Blvd, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas. Nebraska Public Power 

officials will discuss the status of the spent fuel storage project currently underway at the plant. 

“The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the licensee’s plan to safely move spent fuel 

from the spent fuel pools to the dry storage casks,” said Elmo E. Collins, Regional Administrator 

for the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. 

Members of the public will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff before 

the meeting concludes. 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
### §901. Wartime pay of officer of armed force exercising command higher than his grade

In time of war, an officer of an armed force who is serving with troops operating against an enemy and who exercises, under assignment in orders issued by competent authority, a command above that pertaining to his grade, is entitled to the pay and allowances (not above that of pay grade O–7) appropriate to the command so exercised.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 486.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 901 | 37:235a. | Apr. 26, 1898, ch. 191, §7 (less last proviso), 30 Stat. 365. |

Applicability of the source law to the Air Force is based on Transfer Order No. 25(zzz), of the Secretary of Defense, dated October 14, 1948. Its applicability, other than to the Army and the Air Force, is based upon an opinion of the Judge Advocate General of the Navy, JAG 135: DDC; dmt.; 4229, dated July 29, 1960. The words "(but not above that of pay grade O–7)" are substituted for section 235a (proviso) of existing title 37.