alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. II-10-056 July 26, 2010 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS RESTART OF 

THIRD PROCESS LINE AT NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have scheduled a public meeting on 

Tuesday, Aug. 3 to discuss their decision to authorize resumed operations on another process line 

at the Nuclear Fuel Services facility in Erwin, Tenn., where the company voluntarily halted 

production last December due to NRC safety concerns. 

 The meeting is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. in the Erwin Town Hall at 211 North Main 

Ave. in Erwin. Members of the public can observe the business part of the meeting and the NRC 

staff will host a formal question and answer session when that portion has ended. 

 “The Uranium Aluminum line is the third to be authorized to restart and this meeting 

allows us to discuss and answer questions about that decision as well as update people on our 

continuing assessment of NFS operations,” said NRC Region II Division of Fuel Facility 

Inspection Director Tony Gody. 

The Uranium Aluminum line is part of NFS's Blended Low-Enriched Uranium 

Preparation Facility, which processes various forms of high-enriched uranium into low-enriched 

forms suitable for use in commercial facilities. 

 The NRC authorized the restart of the Navy Fuel process line in late March and the 

Uranium Metal/Uranium Oxide line in May after the agency was satisfied that the performance 

deficiencies identified last year were sufficiently addressed by NFS. All NFS process lines were 

shut down in late December 2009 and the NRC issued a confirmatory action letter in January 

designed to address issues that contributed to some earlier events at the facility. 

 The NRC will conduct a readiness inspection for a fourth process line, involving 

uranium hexafluoride processing, when NFS advises the agency it is ready for inspectors to 

evaluate the safety of that operation. 

 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200 

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1934

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that, of the total amount 

of family leave available to a Federal employee based on the birth 

of a child or the placement of a child with the employee for adoption 

or foster care, at least one-half of that time shall be leave with pay. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. HOYER, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. OWENS, Mr. WYNN, Mr. ACKERMAN, 

Mr. ENGEL, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. MORAN of 

Virginia, Ms. LEE, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. MCCARTHY of Missouri, Mr. LYNCH, 

Mr. DINGELL, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Ms. 

DELAURO, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. WAXMAN, and 

Mr. MCNULTY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that, of 

the total amount of family leave available to a Federal 

employee based on the birth of a child or the placement 

of a child with the employee for adoption or foster care, 

at least one-half of that time shall be leave with pay.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 1934 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employees 

3 Paid Parental Leave Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PAID LEAVE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6382 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(f)(1) Of the 12 weeks of leave available to an em9 ployee under subsection (a)(1)(A) or (B) during any 12-

10 month period based on a birth or placement, up to one11 half of that time (as the employee may designate in con12 formance with applicable requirements under paragraph 

13 (3)) shall be with pay. 

14 ‘‘(2) Paid leave under this subsection shall be in addi15 tion to any annual or sick leave which the employee may 

16 otherwise elect to use under subsection (d) as part of the 

17 same 12-week period. 

18 ‘‘(3) The Office shall prescribe any regulations nec19 essary to carry out this subsection, including the manner 

20 in which an employee may designate any day or other pe21 riod that such employee wishes to have treated as a period 

22 of paid leave under this subsection.’’. 

23 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

24 Section 6382 of title 5, United States Code, is amended—

25 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘(d),’’ and in26 serting ‘‘(d) or (f),’’; and 
3

•HR 1934 IH 

1 (2) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘any unpaid’’ 

2 after ‘‘substitute for’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 The amendments made by this Act shall not be effec5 tive with respect to any birth or placement occurring be6 fore the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date 

7 of enactment of this Act.

Æ
# L_2021075EN.01004201.xml

| 4.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 75/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 75/42

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 203/2018

of 21 September 2018

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2021/317]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/712 of 20 April 2017 establishing the reference year and the programme of the statistical data and metadata for population and housing censuses provided for by Regulation (EC) No 763/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/712 of 20 April 2017 establishing the reference year and the programme of the statistical data and metadata for population and housing censuses provided for by Regulation (EC) No 763/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 18yd (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2017/543) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘18ye. | 32017 R 0712: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/712 of 20 April 2017 establishing the reference year and the programme of the statistical data and metadata for population and housing censuses provided for by Regulation (EC) No 763/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 105, 21.4.2017, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘18ye.

32017 R 0712: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/712 of 20 April 2017 establishing the reference year and the programme of the statistical data and metadata for population and housing censuses provided for by Regulation (EC) No 763/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 105, 21.4.2017, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/712 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 22 September 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 21 September 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 105, 21.4.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
## PART IV—GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

Chap.
Sec.
51.
Claims, Effective Dates, and Payments
5100
53.
Special Provisions Relating to Benefits
5301
55.
Minors, Incompetents, and Other Wards
5501
57.
Records and Investigations
5701
59.
Agents and Attorneys
5901
61.
Penal and Forfeiture Provisions
6101
63.
Outreach Activities
6301

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2006**—Pub. L. 109–233, title IV, §402(d)(3), June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 411, added item for chapter 63.

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–330, title III, §308(g)(1)(A), Dec. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 2828, substituted "5100" for "5101" in item for chapter 51.

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–40, title IV, §402(c)(2), May 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 239, substituted "5101" for "3001" in item for chapter 51, "5301" for "3101" in item for chapter 53, "5501" for "3201" in item for chapter 55, "5701" for "3301" in item for chapter 57, "5901" for "3401" in item for chapter 59, and "6101" for "3501" in item for chapter 61.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–687, div. A, title I, §103(c)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4107, substituted "Claims" for "Applications" in item for chapter 51.
§ 875.408 What is the significance of incontestability? ( a ) Incontestability means coverage issued based on an erroneous application may remain in effect. Such coverage will not remain in effect under any of the following conditions: ( 1 ) If your coverage has been in force for less than 6 months, the Carrier may void your coverage upon a showing that information on your signed application that was material to your approval for coverage is different from what is shown in your medical records.
( 2 ) If your coverage has been in force for at least 6 months but less than 2 years, the Carrier may void your coverage upon a showing that information on your signed application that was material to your approval for coverage is different from what is shown in your medical records and pertains to the condition for which benefits are sought.
( 3 ) After your coverage has been in effect for 2 years, the Carrier may void your coverage only upon a showing that you knowingly and intentionally made a false or misleading statement or omitted information in your signed application for coverage regarding your health status that was material to your approval for coverage.
( 4 ) If your coverage is voided, as described in paragraph (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) of this section, no claims will be paid. In addition, the provisions of § 875.104 relating to the procedures for resolving a dispute involving benefits eligibility or claims denials do not apply to your situation. You may request a review by the Carrier if you believe that your coverage was voided in error. You must submit your request in writing to the Carrier within 30 days of the date of the rescission letter (letter voiding your coverage).
( b ) Your coverage can be contested at any time when the Carrier finds that you were not an eligible individual at the time you applied and were approved for coverage.
( c ) If the Carrier voids coverage after it has paid benefits, it cannot recover the benefits already paid.
( d ) Incontestability does not apply when you have not paid your premiums on a timely basis.
[68 FR 5534, Feb. 4, 2003, as amended at 72 FR 12037, Mar. 15, 2007]
### §230301. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Veterans of World War I of the United States of America, Incorporated (in this chapter, the "corporation"), is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Place of Incorporation and Domicile.—The corporation is declared to be incorporated and domiciled in the District of Columbia.

(c) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1482.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230301 | 36:761. | July 18, 1958, Pub. L. 85–530, §§1, 2, 4(1), 72 Stat. 370, 371. |
| | 36:762.36:764(1). | |

Section

36:764(1).

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary and executed words.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ELIGIBILITY; CONTRIBUTIONS; AND MATCHING FUND
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1306** 

REGINALD B. STEWART ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Defendant

– Appellee ,
and

CELINA M. INMAN; VALERIE A. HUTTON ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv
- 03610

- PWG )

Submitted : September 22, 2014 Decided: October 8, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Eden Brown Gaines, BROWN GAINES, LLC, White Plains, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Victor M. Lawrence, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, fo r Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Reginald B. Stewart appeals the district court ’ s order
denying his request for limited discovery and dismissing his
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction . We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart

v. United States , No. 8:13

- cv
- 03610

- PWG (D. Md. Mar. 7, 2014)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §21011. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Added Pub. L. 105–354, §1(5)(A), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3244.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21011 | 36 App.:5909. | Aug. 13, 1998, Pub. L. 105–231, §9, 112 Stat. 1532. |

Section

The words "officers and agents" are substituted for "officers, directors, employees, and agents" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §210307. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation has the exclusive right to use the name "369th Veterans' Association" and seals, emblems, and badges the corporation adopts. This section does not affect any vested rights.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1458.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 210307 | 36:3015. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–565, §16, 98 Stat. 2922. |

Section

The words "sole and" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "This section does not affect any vested rights" are substituted for "Nothing in this section shall be construed to interfere or conflict with established or vested rights" for consistency in the revised title.
#### W. L. Elder, Appellee, v. The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant.

Gen No. 19,285.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John J. Rooney, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Reversed with finding of fact.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by W. L. Elder against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company to recover damages to an automobile owned by plaintiff and struck by an engine belonging to defendant at a street crossing. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for four hundred and sixty-five dollars, defendant appeals.

Loesch, Scofield *&*Loesch, for apppellant.

No appearance for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

*200Abstract of the Decision.

1. Railroads, § *738*
      ***
      *—when judgment for damages to automobile cannot be sustained.*In an action against a railroad company for damages to plaintiff’s automobile by being struck by an engine at a street crossing, the evidence showed that servants of plaintiff attempted to drive the automobile over the crossing on a dark night without looking to see if a train was approaching and that there was nothing to prevent them from seeing the approaching locomotive with its headlight burning had they looked. *Held*that a judgment for plaintiff could not *be sustained for*the reason that plaintiff, through his agents, was guilty of contributory negligence.

2. Railroads, § *668*
      ***
      *—when driver of automobile approaching railroad crossing guilty of contributory negligence.*A person driving an automobile on a dark night upon a railroad track, where it is known that trains are frequently passing, without the slightest concern whether or not a train is approaching is guilty of contributory negligence barring a recovery.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2055 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2055

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
    free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2055

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
    free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN THE NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING HORSES PERMITTED IN 
              CAPE LOOKOUT NATIONAL SEASHORE, NC.

    (a) In General.--The first subsection (b) of section 5 of Public 
Law 89-366 (16 U.S.C. 459g-4) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``100 free roaming 
        horses'' and inserting ``not less than 110 free roaming horses, 
        with a target population of between 120 and 130 free roaming 
        horses,'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a plan to 
        maintain the viability of the herd; or''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``110''.
    (b) Repeal of Duplicate Subsections.--Section 5 of Public Law 89-
366 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a)'' after ``(a)''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the second subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Nacional Financiera, S. A., Respondent, v. Banco de Ponce, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 923.]
#### Thomas O’Laughlin, Appellee, v. Mutual Health and Accident Association of America, Appellant. U. C. Weinstock, Appellee, v. Centralia Gas and Electric Company, Appellant.

Judgments, § *4*****—when may he reverseé for want of court’s legal existence.*Judgments entered by a City Court having no legal existence are wholly void and of no effect and may be reversed on appeal for the reason that the court had no jurisdiction.

Appeal from the City Court of Centralia; the Hon. Albert D. Rodenberg, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1912.

Reversed.

Opinion filed May 1, 1914.

Kagy & Vandervort, for appellant Mutual Health & Accident Association.

L. B. Skipper and W. F. Bundy, for appellee Thomas O’Laughlin.

W. F. Bundy and Noleman & Smith, for appellant Centralia Gas & Electric Company.

L. B. Skipper, C. F. Dewand and C. H. Holt, for appellee U. C. Weinstock.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Per Curiam :

These cases both involve appeals from the City Court of Centralia. After these appeals had been heard by this court and opinions prepared in them, but before judgment was entered here, upon said appeals, the Supreme Court of this State in the case of *People v.*Rodenberg, 254 Ill. 386, held that the city of Centralia had no power under the Constitution to establish a City Court by virtue of the power conferred by the act in relation to courts of record in cities, for the reason that said city was located in two counties.

At the present term of this court, in the case of *People ex rel. Smith v.*Rodenberg, ante, p. 623, we *635have affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion county, entering judgment of ouster against said Albert D. Eodenberg, who is claiming to exercise the office of judge of said City Court by reason of an election to said office held under the act in relation to courts of record in cities, above referred to. Under these circumstances we have concluded that the judgments in the above entitled causes should be and the same are hereby reversed for the reason that the court which entered the same had no legal existence and was without jurisdiction to hear and determine said causes, and that the judgments entered in said causes were wholly void and of no effect; and leave is given to the respective parties to withdraw records, abstracts and briefs filed by them in said appeals.

*Reversed.*
### §20306. Annual report

The corporation shall make an annual report to Congress, to be filed with the Librarian of Congress.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1287.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20306 | 36:4204 (related to report). | Apr. 17, 1916, ch. 77, §4 (related to report), 39 Stat. 51. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 196 of House Document No. 103–7.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00809

- CR

Ex Parte George GARCIA

, Appellant

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Co urt No. 2000CR5603W The Honorable Andrew Wyatt Carruthers, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chi ef Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

O n January 14, 2015, after Appellant failed to provide this court with an appealable order

or a trial court certification of Appellant’s right of appeal, we dismissed this appeal for want of
jurisdiction.

On January 22, 2015, Appellant filed a motion for rehearing and

, the next day , the Bexar
County District Clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record which contains, as previously ordered,

a signed, written order and a trial court’s certification

. Acting sua sponte , we withdraw our opinion and order of January 14, 2015, that
dismissed this appeal, and our order of the same date w hich assigned the panel and set the

submission date f or this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 19.1 , 31.1

.
Appe llant’s motion for rehearing is moot

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1.

The clerk’s and reporter’s recor ds have been filed; A ppellant’s brief is due T WENTY

DAYS from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1, 38.6(a).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justi ceIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Cler k of Court