alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 67374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 28, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 21, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service Contract 7 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2019-64, CP2019-69.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-28188 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 841.404 Demographic factors. ( a ) The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will consider the factors listed below in determining normal cost percentages. To the extent data are available for the factor by specific category of employees, such data will be used. To the extent category specific data are not available, the most relevant available data will be used. ( 1 ) Distributions of new entrants by age, sex, and service;
( 2 ) Withdrawal rates;
( 3 ) Merit salary increases;
( 4 ) Voluntary retirement rates;
( 5 ) Involuntary retirement rates;
( 6 ) Disability retirement rates;
( 7 ) Employee death rates;
( 8 ) Military service rates;
( 9 ) Family characteristics for employees;
( 10 ) Death rates for non-disability annuitants;
( 11 ) Death and recovery rates for disability annuitants;
( 12 ) Child survivor termination and death rates;
( 13 ) Family characteristics for annuitants; and
( 14 ) Administrative expenses.
( b ) Generally, each rate, ratio, or fraction must be separately considered to determine the rates for males and their survivors and the rates for females and their survivors, except those rates for child survivors and merit salary increases.
# L_2020228EN.01002001.xml

| 16.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 228/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 228/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 11/2019

of 8 February 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/930]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1513 of 10 October 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards certain substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (CMR), category 1A or 1B (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1513 of 10 October 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards certain substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (CMR), category 1A or 1B (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 1513: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1513 of 10 October 2018 (OJ L 256, 12.10.2018, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 1513: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/1513 of 10 October 2018 (OJ L 256, 12.10.2018, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2018/1513 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 February 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 February 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 256, 12.10.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Martin V. W. Hall, Plaintiff, v. Woodmere Homestead Company and Others, Defendants.

Motion denied. Present — Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
§ 875.110 May OPM suspend applications for FLTCIP coverage? ( a ) OPM may suspend applications for FLTCIP coverage, including coverage increases, when OPM determines that a suspension is in the best interest of the Program.
( b ) OPM will issue a document in the Federal Register with the effective date of the suspension period, during which no applications for FLTCIP coverage will be accepted. The effective date will be determined at the discretion of the Director and will be at least 30 days after the publication date of the document.
( c ) The duration of the suspension period, as determined at the discretion of the Director and not to exceed 24 months unless subsequently extended, will be announced in a document published in the Federal Register.
( d ) At least 30 days before the end of the suspension period, OPM may issue a document in the Federal Register announcing an extension of the suspension period when OPM determines that such extension is in the best interest of the Program. The duration of any extension to the suspension period will not exceed 24 months, unless subsequently extended by additional periods of suspension, each not to exceed 24 months.
[87 FR 68597, Nov. 16, 2022]
Strafford,

June, 1899.

#### Fish *v.*Hobart.

A creditor resident in this state is not made party to an insolvency proceeding in another state by the unauthorized act of his attorney in attending a meeting of creditors, and objecting to the selection of a proposed assignee.

Assumpsit. Facts found by a referee. March 4, 1895, the defendant, who was indebted to the plaintiff, went into insolvency in Massachusetts. The plaintiff was a resident of New Hampshire and did not prove his claim; but his attorney, acting in his behalf, attended a meeting of the defendant’s creditors called for the selection of an assignee, and objected to the appointment of one Brown. The attorney based his objection upon the ground that he represented a creditor having a large claim, and that he thought there might be some fraudulent collusion between the defendant and those of his creditors who desired Brown’s appointment. He also stated to the court that the creditor whom he represented had not proved his claim, and that he did not know whether it would be proved. Thereupon the court appointed the plaintiff’s attorney and Brown assignees. They accepted the trust and served until the defendant was discharged in insolvency, October 18, 1895. The attorney was not instructed by the plaintiff to appear at the meeting, and the plaintiff did not know how his attorney came to be appointed assignee.

The court ordered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant excepted.

*597
      *Samuel*IV. *Fmery,*for the plaintiff.

*Arthur G. Whittemore*and *John S. II. Frink,*for the defendant.

Peasuee, J.

The plaintiff’s claim was not affected by the insolvency proceedings in Massachusetts, unless he in some way became a party thereto. *Perley*v. *Mason,*64 N. H. 6; *Baldwin*v. *Hale,*1 Wall. 223.

The acts of his attorney were not sufficient for this purpose. While the attorney attended the meeting and objected to the appointment of Brown as assignee, he at the same time stated that the plaintiff’s claim might not be proved. The court was fairly informed that the plaintiff proposed to rely upon his rights as a non-resident, and that what was said by his counsel was merely such suggestions as it is the right and official duty of every attorney to make when he believes a fraud upon the court is attempted. The suggestions did not control the selection of an assignee. They were merely advisory, and the fact that in view of them the court saw fit to exercise the statutory power to appoint a co-assignee (Mass. P. S., c. 157, *s.*41) cannot operate to the prejudice of the plaintiff’s rights. Nor are those rights affected by the acts of the attorney as assignee, for he was then acting as trustee for the creditors and not as the plaintiff’s agent.

*Exception overruled.*

Parsons, L, did not sit: the others concurred.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-029 July 26, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Co. on Monday, July 31, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance for last year at the

Braidwood Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Braceville, Ill.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Reed-Custer

High School, 249 South Comet Drive, in Braidwood. The NRC will respond to questions or comments

from the public before the close of the meeting.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Braidwood plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting’s discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/brai_2005q4.pdf .

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Braidwood plant operated safely during the period. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Braidwood during 2005 were

determined to be “green.” The NRC will conduct normal, baseline level of inspections during 2006.

However, the NRC recently identified a “white” finding related to the unplanned releases of

trititum onsite and offsite and is evaluating the need for additional inspections.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill. Among the areas of plant operations
to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are fire protection, problem identification and resolution,

access control to radiologically significant areas, and reactor pressure vessel head and vessel head

penetration nozzles.

Current performance information for Braidwood is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRAI1/brai1_chart.html (Unit 1) 

and

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRAI2/brai2_chart.html (Unit 2). 

###
### §20209. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Added Pub. L. 105–354, §1(4)(A), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3241.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20209 | 36 App.:5810. | Nov. 18, 1997, Pub. L. 105–85, title XV, §1510, 111 Stat. 1965. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "This section may not be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0189 - U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commision Implementation Plan for the Radioactive Protection and Security Task Force Report

Accession Number: ML082950623

Date Released: Monday, December 22, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML082940477 - SECY-08-0189 - U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Implementation Plan for the Radiation Source Protection and Security Task Force Report (3 page(s), 12/8/2008)
    - ML082950751 - SECY-08-0189 - Enclosure: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Implementation Plan for the Radiation Source Protection and Security Task Force Report (56 page(s), 12/8/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
B.C.D. 01-59

JUL 0 5 2001

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Western Railroad Association

Railroad Publication Services

Railroad Data Processing Services

Railroad Support Services

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of Western Railroad Association (WRA) (B.A. No. 7234), Railroad

Publication Services (RPS) (B.A. No. 7533), Railroad Data Processing Services

(RDPS) (B.A. No. 7532) and Railroad Support Services (RSS) (B.A. No. 7531) as

employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seq.) (RRA) and

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.§ 351, et seq.) (RULA). WRA

was ruled to be an employer under the Acts effective January 1, 1970. RPS, RDPS, 

and RSS were all ruled to be railroad employers effective May 1, 1987.

Mr. Clyde V. McIntyre, Director, Marketing Services, CSX Transportation, advised

the Board, in his letter of April 18, 2001, that he is the chairperson of the

Administrative Committee, which consists of representatives from BNSF, CN, CP,

CSXT, NS and UP. Mr. McIntyre was responding to the Board’s inquiry concerning

the status of WRA, RPS, RDPS and RSS as covered employers under the RRA and

RUIA.

Mr. McIntyre reported that WRA ceased operation in 1995, leaving RPS, RDPS and

RSS in operation until December 31, 2000, at which time RPS, RDPS and RSS

ceased operations.

Based on the above information, it is the determination of the Railroad Retirement

Board that Western Railroad Association ceased to be an employer under the RRA

and RUIA on December 31, 1995, the last day of the year in which it last operated.

It is further determined that Railroad Publication Services, Railroad Data

Processing Services and Railroad Support Services ceased to be employers under

the Acts administered by the Board on December 31, 2000, the day on which each

entity ceased operations.

BA# 7532
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

t0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144819

JUDY HOTCHKISS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144819

COA: 302981 

St Clair CC: 09-003298-CZ

CLAY TOWNSHIP BOARD, CLAY

TOWNSHIP CHIEF ASSESSOR, and CLAY

TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 880.102 Regulatory structure. ( a ) This part contains the following subparts: ( 1 ) Subpart A contains general information about this part and related subjects.
( 2 ) Subpart B establishes the procedures that OPM will follow in missing annuitant cases.
( 3 ) Subpart C establishes the methodologies that OPM will apply in determining continuations of coverage and amounts of payments in missing annuitant cases.
( b ) Part 831 of this chapter contains information about benefits under CSRS.
( c ) Part 838 of this chapter contains information about benefits available to former spouses under court orders.
( d ) Parts 841 through 844 of this chapter contain information about benefits under FERS.
( e ) Part 870 of this chapter contains information about benefits under FEGLI.
( f ) Part 890 of this chapter contains information about benefits under FEHBP.
( g ) Part 1200 of this title contains information about Merit Systems Protection Board review of OPM decisions affecting interests in CSRS or FERS benefits.
( h ) Part 1600 of this title contains information about benefits under the Thrift Savings Plan.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,437-01

EX P ARTE SHE RRON DONDR IEL PHILLIPS, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR-566- 12-D(1) IN THE 206T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HIDALG O COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R P u rs u an t t o the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 8 2 4 , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of marihuana

and sente nced to f

orty -two months’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. I n a single g round, Applicant contends that the Boa rd of Pardons and Paroles’ written notice of its decision not to rele ase him to parole violates due proce ss. See T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E § 508.1411. We order that this application be filed and set for submissi on to deter mine the following questions: (1) whether an applicant who contends that under § 508.1411 the Boa rd of Pardons an d P ar oles’2

written notic e v i o l at es the Due Process Clause of the United States Constit ution has an adequate

reme dy on habea s when ther e is not a pre sumption of relea se to parole ; (2) a ssuming for the sake 1 of arg ument that an applicant does have an adequate reme dy on habea s, whether § 508.1411 implicates due proce ss and the written notice provided by the Boa rd of Pardons and Paroles satisfies due process; and (3) whether an application for a wr it of mandamus is the proper reme dy for such claims. The parties shall brief these issues. The Boa rd of Pardons and Paroles is invited to submit a brie f. The trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f he is indig ent and desires to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent him. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 60 d ay s o f t h e d at e o f this order , a suppl emental transcript containing either the order appointi ng counsel or a st atement that Applicant is not indige nt. All briefs shall be filed with this Court within 90 day s of the date of this order

.

Filed: De cembe r 17, 2014 Do not publish

See Ex parte Ge iken , 28 S.W .3d 553, 558 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E § 1 508.141(a)

.
floatX=5;floatY=150;layerwidth=20;layerheight=20;halign="left";valign="bottom";delayspeed=0;// This script is copyright (c) Henrik Petersen, NetKontoret// Feel free to use this script on your own pages as long as you do not change it.// It is illegal to distribute the script as part of a tutorial / script archive.// Updated version available at: http://www.echoecho.com/toolfloatinglayer.htm// This comment and the 4 lines above may not be removed from the code.NS6=false;IE4=(document.all);if (!IE4) {NS6=(document.getElementById);}NS4=(document.layers);function adjust() {if ((NS4) || (NS6)) {if (lastX==-1 || delayspeed==0){lastX=window.pageXOffset + floatX;lastY=window.pageYOffset + floatY;}else{var dx=Math.abs(window.pageXOffset+floatX-lastX);var dy=Math.abs(window.pageYOffset+floatY-lastY);var d=Math.sqrt(dx*dx+dy*dy);var c=Math.round(d/10);if (window.pageXOffset+floatX>lastX) {lastX=lastX+delayspeed+c;}if (window.pageXOffset+floatX<lastX) {lastX=lastX-delayspeed-c;}if (window.pageYOffset+floatY>lastY) {lastY=lastY+delayspeed+c;}if (window.pageYOffset+floatY<lastY) {lastY=lastY-delayspeed-c;}}if (NS4){document.layers['floatlayer'].pageX = lastX;document.layers['floatlayer'].pageY = lastY;}if (NS6){document.getElementById('floatlayer').style.left=lastX;document.getElementById('floatlayer').style.top=lastY;}}else if (IE4){if (lastX==-1 || delayspeed==0){lastX=document.body.scrollLeft + floatX;lastY=document.body.scrollTop + floatY;}else{var dx=Math.abs(document.body.scrollLeft+floatX-lastX);var dy=Math.abs(document.body.scrollTop+floatY-lastY);var d=Math.sqrt(dx*dx+dy*dy);var c=Math.round(d/10);if (document.body.scrollLeft+floatX>lastX) {lastX=lastX+delayspeed+c;}if (document.body.scrollLeft+floatX<lastX) {lastX=lastX-delayspeed-c;}if (document.body.scrollTop+floatY>lastY) {lastY=lastY+delayspeed+c;}if (document.body.scrollTop+floatY<lastY) {lastY=lastY-delayspeed-c;}}document.all['floatlayer'].style.posLeft = lastX;document.all['floatlayer'].style.posTop = lastY;} setTimeout('adjust()',50);}function define(){if ((NS4) || (NS6)) { if (halign=="left") {floatX=ifloatX};if (halign=="right") {floatX=window.innerWidth-ifloatX-layerwidth-20};if (halign=="center") {floatX=Math.round((window.innerWidth-20)/2)-Math.round(layerwidth/2)};if (valign=="top") {floatY=ifloatY};if (valign=="bottom") {floatY=window.innerHeight-ifloatY-layerheight};if (valign=="center") {floatY=Math.round((window.innerHeight-20)/2)-Math.round(layerheight/2)};}if (IE4) {if (halign=="left") {floatX=ifloatX};if (halign=="right") {floatX=document.body.offsetWidth-ifloatX-layerwidth-20}if (halign=="center") {floatX=Math.round((document.body.offsetWidth-20)/2)-Math.round(layerwidth/2)}if (valign=="top") {floatY=ifloatY};if (valign=="bottom") {floatY=document.body.offsetHeight-ifloatY-layerheight}if (valign=="center") {floatY=Math.round((document.body.offsetHeight-20)/2)-Math.round(layerheight/2)}}}