alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. I-10-010 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

March 23, 2010 

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT 

VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected David Spindler as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the Vermont 

Yankee nuclear power plant, in Vernon (Windham County), Vt. 

Spindler joined the NRC in October 2006 as a boiling-water reactor 

training specialist at the NRC’s Professional Development Center in 

Bethesda, Md. In November 2007, he became the Resident Inspector at the 

Beaver Valley nuclear power plant in Shippingport, Pa. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Spindler worked as a software specialist, a control room 

supervisor and a shift manager at the FitzPatrick nuclear power plant. He also worked for 

General Physics Corp. in Pottstown, Pa., and served in the U.S. Navy as a reactor operator. 

Spindler earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Maryland and a master’s 

degree in business administration from Syracuse University. 

 “Dave Spindler has an extensive technical background, and he has demonstrated the 

dedication to safety to carry out NRC’s commitment to protect people and the environment,” 

NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins said. “He joins our Resident Inspector at 

Vermont Yankee, Heather Jones, as NRC point persons for the careful monitoring of daily plant 

operations.” 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC Resident Inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring 

major work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can 

be assigned to any one site for up to seven years. 

The Vermont Yankee Resident Inspectors can be reached at (802) 257-4319. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Enrico Piparo, Respondent, against Hyman L. Klar et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an award for bilateral inguinal herniae as an occupational disease. The evidence sustains the award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ.
#### § 875.202 Am I eligible as a Federal annuitant?

If you are a Federal annuitant, including a survivor annuitant, a deferred annuitant, or a compensationer, you are eligible to apply for coverage. Separated Federal employees with title to a deferred annuity may apply for coverage, even if they are not yet receiving that annuity.

[68 FR 5534, Feb. 4, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 30607, May 27, 2005]
```

[House Report 107-294]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-294

======================================================================

 
WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
  RULES

                                _______
                                

  November 16 (legislative day, November 15), 2001.--Referred to the 
                House Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 290]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 290, by a non-record vote to report the same 
to the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                Summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of November 
16, 2001, providing for consideration or disposition of a 
conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1447) to improve 
aviation security, and for other purposes, or any amendment 
reported in disagreement from a conference thereon.

                                  

```
§ 831.1002 Definitions. *Contribution and benefit base* means the contribution and benefit base in effect with respect to the tax year involved, as determined under section 230 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 430).
*CSRS* means the Civil Service Retirement System established under subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code.
*Employee* means an employee subject to CSRS.
*Federal service* means service covered under CSRS and subject to the OASDI tax by operation of section 101 of Public Law 98-21 (42 U.S.C. 410(a)). *Federal service* does not include— ( 1 ) Service performed before January 1, 1984;
( 2 ) Service subject to the OASDI tax only (that is, no simultaneous CSRS deductions), except in the case of an employee or Member who elected not to have any CSRS deductions withheld from salary pursuant to section 208(a)(1)(A) of Public Law 98-168, 97 Stat. 1111, or section 2206(b) of Public Law 98-369, 98 Stat. 1059, (relating to certain senior officials; and
( 3 ) Service subject to the full rate of CSRS deductions (7, 71 ⁄ 2, or 8 percent) and the OASDI tax, pursuant to an election under section 208(a)(1)(B) of Public Law 98-168, 97 Stat. 1111, except in the case of an employee or Member who elects to become subject to this subpart under section 301(b) of Public Law 99-335, 100 Stat. 599.
*Federal wages* means basic pay, as defined under 5 U.S.C. 8331(4), of an employee or Member performing Federal service.
*Member* means a Member of Congress as defined by 5 U.S.C. 8331(2).
*OASDI tax* means, with respect to Federal wages, the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance tax imposed under section 3101(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3101(a)).
#### § 7701.101 Purpose.

In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations of this part apply to employees of the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. In addition to the regulations in 5 CFR part 2635 and this part, employees of IMLS are subject to the executive branch employee responsibilities and conduct regulations at 5 CFR part 735, the executive branch financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634, and the executive branch financial interests regulations at 5 CFR part 2640.
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan Rootenberg, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) of Adira Energy Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/
      Alan Rootenberg
| | ------ | -------------------------
| | Name:  | Alan Rootenberg          
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer  
| |        |                          
| |        |                          
| |        |                          
| | Date:  | January 15, 2010         

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

267) IV-C-13 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:04 AM Sheet 267 of 276 
w 

b 

P.2 

iv-c-1 3 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OEC 5 1991 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADM ION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: "Delays" in Resolving Section 407 NOx Requirement and 

WEPCO 

FROM: William G. Rosenberg 

/assistant Administrator 

for Air and Radiation 

TO: Linda Stuntz 

Deputy Under Secretary 

Policy, Planning and Analysis 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Your November 29 memo on WEPCO and NOx is ironically 

indicative of the difficulties we are having in resolving these 

policy and timing issues. Let me address your points in the order 

presented. 

First, because of unsuccessful staff level meetings, Eileen 

Cl auusen, uur .lead manager on NOx, contacted your deputy, Howard 

Grcunspecht on November 26, 1991. They are now set to meet 

December 9 to try to resolve the NOx issue, following which we will 

send to OMB the rule on December 20 and the preamble on January 10. 

Second, concerning the NOx rule in general, we have had 

numerous meetings and conference calls with your staff, starting 

September 27th and followed with a proposed draft regulation on 

October 7, 1991. More recently, your staff offered to provide us 

a response by December 2 to our October 7 proposal — 2 months 

after we delivered that proposal. As of December 5 we had not yet 

received a comprehensive response to our proposal. 

Third, we agree with you regarding the need to proceed as 

expeditiously as possible with a final WEPCO rule. We also share 

your concern about the need to provide certainty with respect to 

utility projects and compliance with the Clean Air Act. However, 

as you know, on July 22, 1991, the Health and Environment 

Subcommittee on the Environment and Commerce held a hearing on the 

proposed WEPCO rule. At the hearing, without your objection, EPA 

agreed to have the transcript of the hearing placed in the docket 

Printnrt nn Runvriorf Pnnpr 
J" 

P.3 

and take public comment at that time. It is precisely because of 

the need to continue to make progress on the WEPCO rulemaking that, 

even though an official copy of the hearing transcript had not 

been made available to EPA, we reopened the comment-period for a 

short time in December to take comment on the unofficial 

transcript. 

I will also point out that the reopening of the comment 

period, and its duration, were agreed to through the standard 

process with OMB, white House Counsel, Office of Policy Development 

and the Council on Competitiveness staff. If your views were not 

adequately represented, I suggest you address that separately. 

Additionally, we have received a letter from the large power 

producers to extend the comment period, and if we decide to do so, 

still plan to meet our January 17 schedule. 

I look forward to a resolution of these and other issues, 

cc: Alan Hubbard
### §21. Mineral lands reserved

In all cases lands valuable for minerals shall be reserved from sale, except as otherwise expressly directed by law.

(R.S. §2318.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2318 derived from act July 4, 1866, ch. 166, §5, 14 Stat. 86.
§ 595.107 What are the requirements for implementing a physicians' comparability allowance program? ( a ) An agency may not enter into any service agreement under 5 U.S.C. 5948 until the agency's plan for implementing the physicians' comparability allowance program has been submitted to and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with this section and such instructions as the Office of Management and Budget may prescribe.
( b ) The agency must submit to the Office of Management and Budget a complete description of its plan for implementing the physicians' comparability allowance program, including the following: ( 1 ) An identification of the categories of physician positions the agency has established under § 595.103, and of the basis for such categories;
( 2 ) An explanation of the determination that a recruitment and retention problem exists for each such category, in accordance with the criteria in § 595.104; and
( 3 ) An explanation of the basis for the amount of comparability allowance determined necessary for each category of physician position under § 595.105.
( c ) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review each agency's plan for implementing the physicians' comparability allowance program and determine whether the plan is consistent with 5 U.S.C. 5948 and the requirements of this part. The Office of Management and Budget will advise the agency within 45 calendar days after receipt of the plan as to whether the plan is consistent with 5 U.S.C. 5948 and this part or what changes need to be made.
[44 FR 40876, July 13, 1979, as amended at 53 FR 8142, Mar. 14, 1988, and 53 FR 24011, June 27, 1988; 69 FR 27818, May 17, 2004]
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofTell-A-Tale Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
#### Ralph L. BORN, Appellant, v. R. J. LAUBE et al., Appellees.

No. 13304.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

July 15, 1954.

Bailey E. Bell, William H. Sanders, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant.

James E. Swan, Peter J. Kalamarides, Anchorage, Alaska, Sam Bassett, Bas-sett, Geisness & Vance, Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Norman W. Harris, Decatur, Ala., amicus curise.

Before HEALY, ORR, and LEMMON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for rehearing is predicated largely upon the claim that our decision is in conflict with the intervening holding of the Supreme Court in United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Construction Corporation, 347 U.S. 656, 74 S.Ct. 833.

We have carefully considered the Laburnum decision and are of opinion that it is distinguishable inasmuch as the complaining party there, under the Labor Management Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., was wholly without remedy in damages for the tortious conduct of the Union. Here the complaining employee had available the remedy of reinstatement with back pay. Moreover, unlike Laburnum, there was no violence or threat of violence which might serve to bring the cause within the area of the Territorial police power.

The petition for rehearing is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2001 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2001

  To amend title 32, United States Code, to revise the matching funds 
 requirements for States participating in the National Guard Challenge 
Program and to authorize appropriations for the program for fiscal year 
                          2004 and thereafter.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2003

  Mr. Baker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 32, United States Code, to revise the matching funds 
 requirements for States participating in the National Guard Challenge 
Program and to authorize appropriations for the program for fiscal year 
                          2004 and thereafter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL GUARD YOUTH CHALLENGE PROGRAM.

    (a) Matching Funds Requirements.--Subsection (d) of section 509 of 
title 32, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraphs (1) 
through (4) and inserting the following new paragraphs:
            ``(1) for fiscal year 2004, 65 percent of the costs of 
        operating the State program during that year;
            ``(2) for fiscal year 2005, 70 percent of the costs of 
        operating the State program during that year; and
            ``(3) for fiscal year 2006 and each subsequent fiscal year, 
        75 percent of the costs of operating the State program during 
        that year.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Such section is further 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(n) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of Defense to carry out the National 
Guard Challenge Program the following amounts:
            ``(1) $71,200,000 for fiscal year 2004.
            ``(2) $76,200,000 for fiscal year 2005.
            ``(3) $81,200,000 for fiscal year 2006 and each subsequent 
        fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that a conference call of the Vermont Advisory Committee will convene at 10:30 a.m. and adjourn at 11 a.m., Tuesday, November, 16, 2004. The purpose of the conference call is to discuss juvenile justice issues in Vermont.

This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-659-8294, access code: 30141003. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the supplied call-in number or over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and access code.

                    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Barbara de La                           ( print page 65580)                        Viez of the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533 by 4 p.m. on Monday, November 15, 2004.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Dated in Washington, DC, November 8, 2004.

Ivy L. Davis,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 04-25248 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
§ 875.107 What are OPM's responsibilities as regulator under this Program? Consistent with the authority and discretion given to OPM by the FLTCIP law, OPM's responsibilities include those functions typically associated with, and preemptive of, State insurance regulatory authorities such as: ( a ) Reviewing and approving the content and format of materials associated with the FLTCIP pursuant to section 9008(d) of title 5, United States Code;
( b ) Reviewing and approving rates, forms, and marketing materials;
( c ) Determining the qualifications of enrollment personnel and the Program administrator(s);
( d ) Suspending applications for FLTCIP coverage, including coverage increases as specified in § 875.110; and
( e ) Holding special application periods as specified in § 875.402.
[68 FR 5534, Feb. 4, 2003, as amended at 87 FR 68597, Nov. 16, 2022]