alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019112EN.01000101.xml

| 26.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 112/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 112/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation

The Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation (1), signed in Santo Domingo on 25 October 2016, shall, pursuant to its Article 25.1, enter into force as from 17 May 2019.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 103, 12.4.2019, p. 3.

1

---
### §210306. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1457.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 210306 | 36:3002. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–565, §2, 98 Stat. 2920. |

Section

The words "and subject to the laws of such State or States" are omitted as unnecessary.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Jeffrey Allen Lindsay

,

Appellant,

v.

The Estate of Roy Orey Lindsay, Sr., Roy

A. Lindsay, Rainey L. Lindsay, Susan

Lindsay Thomas, Joni K. Lindsay, Roy A.

("Sonny") Lindsay, and Hanging H.

Ranch, Inc.

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 212

- C V

Appeal from the

143 rd District Court

of Reeves C ounty, Texas

(TC# 13

- 12

- 20542 P3137 )

O R D E R

On October 28, 2021, the Court issued a letter requesting the parties to file a motion to

dismiss by November 17, 2021. As of this date, no motion to dismiss has been filed. Therefore,

the Court ORDERS the parties to file a motion to dismiss by December 2, 2021. If no motion to

dismiss is filed, the Court will continue with the appeal without a reporter’s record.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 2 2 nd day of November , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 135)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EschelonTelecom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Richard A. Smith, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his knowledge:

 

(1)          The report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Sign:                                 | /S/  Richard A. Smith |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| March 31, 2005                   |

 

----
§ 894.501 When may I enroll? You may enroll: ( a ) During the annual open season;
( b ) Within 60 *days* after you first become eligible as: ( 1 ) A new *employee* or employee of the United States Postal Service;
( 2 ) A previously ineligible *employee* or employee of the United States Postal Service who transfers to a covered position;
( 3 ) A new survivor *annuitant,* if not already covered under FEDVIP;
( 4 ) An *employee* or an employee of the United States Postal Service working on a temporary appointment as stated in § 894.302(e)(5); an *employee* or employee of the United States Postal Service working on a seasonal schedule as stated in § 894.302(f); or an *employee* or employee of the United States Postal Service working on an intermittent schedule as stated in § 894.302(g);
( 5 ) An *employee* in a position identified by OPM that provides emergency response services for wildland fire protection pursuant to § 890.102(h) of this chapter; or an *employee* performing similar types of emergency response services pursuant to § 890.102(i) of this chapter for whom OPM grants eligibility to enroll based on a request by the employing agency. In granting eligibility requests, OPM may limit the coverage of intermittent employees to the periods of time during which they are in a pay status;
( 6 ) A *TEI certifying family member,* but only if, on your first date of eligibility to enroll, your *sponsor* is not a *TEI* or is deceased, or for FEDVIP dental coverage, if your *sponsor* is defined at § 894.309(a)(3)(iii); or
( 7 ) A *TEI former spouse;*
( c ) Within 60 days of when you return to service following a break in service of at least 30 days;
( d ) From 31 days before you or an eligible family member loses other dental or vision coverage to 60 days after a QLE that allows you to enroll;
( e ) For a *sponsor* who becomes eligible as a *TEI,* from 31 days before you lose other dental or vision coverage as an active duty service member to 60 days after you become eligible to enroll as a uniformed services retiree who is a *TEI;*
( f ) From 31 days before you get married to 60 days after; )
( g ) Within 60 days after returning to Federal employment or employment with the United States Postal Service after being on leave without pay if you did not have Federal dental or vision coverage prior to going on leave without pay, or your coverage was terminated or canceled during your period of leave without pay;
( h ) Within 60 days of your *annuity* or *compensation* being restored after having been terminated; or
( i ) For a *TEI,* within 60 days of your uniformed services pay or uniformed services retirement pay being restored after having been reduced, forfeited, or terminated.
[73 FR 50184, Aug. 26, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 20514, Apr. 20, 2010; 79 FR 41405, July 16, 2014; 83 FR 58179, Nov. 19, 2018; 88 FR 47747, July 25, 2023]
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

MEMORANDUM

FORM G-lISr (1-92)

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

March 10, 2000 

L-2000-8

TO Joseph M. Waechter, Jr.

Assistant to the Management Member

FROM Steven A. Bartholovw 

General CounseJ.^

SUBJECT : Excess Earnings

Limited Liability Corporations

This is in reply to your inquiry as to how income from limited liability corporations (LLC) is 

to be treated in regard to the excess earnings provisions of the Social Security Act.

LLCs are generally classified as partnerships for the purposes of federal income taxes. 

Thus, members of LLCs are treated as partners. A general summary of social security law1 

indicates that, while income paid to a general partner would be considered selfemployment income and therefore subject to the excess earnings test, income paid to 

limited partners would not be considered earnings unless that income is paid for services 

rendered2.

While it is not entirely clear what constitutes a general, as compared to a limited, member 

of an LLC, an LLC should be treated as a partnership for the purpose of determining 

whether payments by the LLC to members constitute earnings from employment

11999 Social Security Explained. If 409.

2 All earnings from LLCs owned by one individual would be regarded as self-employment

income and would be subject to the earnings test. A member of an LLC that is taxed as

a corporation would be subject to the excess earnings test on his or her salary, but not

on dividends or distributions.
or self-employment. Accordingly, it would then be the case that an individual would be a 

limited member (analogous to a limited partner) unless that individual is personally liable 

for the debts of the LLC, has authority to contract for it, and works for it a substantial 

amount of time3.

The LLC is a relatively new phenomenon, and there is as yet no complete answer to your 

question. For the purposes of determining whether FICA tax is due on income received 

from an LLC, it must be decided in each case whether that income is to be reported as 

employment or self-employment income, or as a return on investment. The result reached 

in that determination should be applied to the earnings test as well.

r /> v v

[ MCLitt:cmw

H:\WP7DATA\OPINIONS\L-2000-8.doc

'y n

3 Other criteria which may be used include the seven tests used by the Internal Revenue

Service to distinguish between passive and active income: participation by the individual

of more than 500 hours, the individual’s participation constitutes substantially all of the

participation of all individuals, participation of more than 100 hours with no one else

participating more, etc. Another approach suggested by 1999 Social Security Explained

would be to subject income from an LLC to the earnings test only to the extent that that

income represents services rendered. A third approach suggested would be to treat all

income from an LLC as subject to the earnings test.
OFFICE OF TIlE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

.Date Printed: Mlay 31,2007 17:41

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

LTR-07-0389

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 05/30/2007

'To'. cF m _

AUTiHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

GOV Donald Carcieri

RI-GOV

Dale Klein

Energy Policy Act of 2005

Appropriate

RF

05/18/2007

No

Immediate release to the public via SECY/EDO/DPC

EDO

DEDMRS

DEDR

DEDIA

AOP-1

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

State House

Providence, Rhode Island 02903-1196

401-222-2080

Donald L. Carcieri

Governor

May 18, 2007

Dr. Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory' Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 651 (e) of the

Energy Policy Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and

accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections

SlIe. (3) and lIe. (4) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

In 1980, the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations entered into an Agreement

with the Commission under Section 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended. Under that Agreement, the State licenses byproduct material as defined in

Section 1 Ie. (1) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, the State licenses the naturally

occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct

material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from

the program for licensing lIe. (1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to

the licensing program that would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy.

Further, we intend to continue to license the new byproduct material under this same

program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the State of Rhode Island and Providence

Plantations has a program for licensing byproduct material, as defined in paragraph (3) or

(4) of Section lIe. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, that is adequate to

protect the public health and safety, and that the State intends to continue to implement

our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct material.
,e

May 18, 2007

Dr. Dale E. Klein, Ph.D.

Page Two

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the

Transition of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct

Material."

Sincerely,

Donald L. Carcieri

Governor

cc: Janet Schlueter, NRC (Director-STP)

James Kottan, NRC (RSAO-Region I)

David R. Gifford, MD, MPH, Director of Health
# L_2017263EN.01003401.xml

| 12.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 263/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 263/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 315/2015

of 11 December 2015

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1826]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2000/520/EC (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, was declared invalid by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 6 October 2015 in Case C-362/14 (2) and consequently the reference to Decision 2000/520/EC is to be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2000/520/EC (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, was declared invalid by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 6 October 2015 in Case C-362/14 (2) and consequently the reference to Decision 2000/520/EC is to be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 5ec (Commission Decision 2000/520/EC) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 215, 25.8.2000, p. 7.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015, p. 5.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NO, 600516-A 

## ARTHUR JOSEPH ALVAREZ RECEIVEDIN 

# tdc'-id6fass^i""' COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS
HUGHES UNIT RT. 2 BOX 4400 

## Gatesville, Texas 76597 ncp ]qQjj',/

To: Deanna Williams, Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas P.O. Box 1230B Capital Station 

### Austin, Texas 7B711 Re: Court Order to surrender Attorney DeanaWilliamson,Clerk irt Order to •render Attorney Emily Detato affidavit Chris Daniel, Clerk of the Court Criminal Post-Trial Section of 

### Harris County, District Clerks Office 1201 Franklin, 3rd Floor 

### Houston, Texas 77002 Date: December 14, 2017

Tr. Ct. No. 600516-A 

### UR-87,223-02 ,
DEAR CLERK , the state having considered the Applicant's, Arthur Alvarez, application for writ of habeas corpus in the above captioned
cause, designated issue of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel needed to be resolved, pursuant to 11.07 § 3 (d). 

### EMILY DETOTO (attorney) Idas ORDERED to filed affidavit summarizing the actions taken to represent Applicant with the Criminal Post-Trial Section of Harris 

### County District Clerk's Office, WITHIN 30 DAYS of signing of State'sOrder, 

### September 2017. Upon receiving (attorney) EMILY DETDTD affidavit the CLERK OF THE COURT was ORDERED to send a copy of said affidavit to Applicant Arthur Alvarez and counsel for the State, Beanna Schartz. To this date 12/14/17 applicant has NOT received the above mentioned affidavit filed by attorney EMILY DETOTO. 

### Applicant, Mr. Alvarez, PLEADS to theClerk of theCourt tosurrender a copy of the above mentioned affidavit as'uas ORDERED by the Court. 

### Further delay will impede Applicant's attempts to properly &adequately challenge his conviction & sentence. 

### Respecfully Submitted,_ 

## AA/File ArthurJaesphAlvarez, prose
Exhibit 31.2

              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Paul D. Watson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of IDI Global, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


                                   /s/ Paul D. Watson
Date: March 29, 2004               ____________________________________
                                   Paul D. Watson
                                   Chief Financial Officer
### §1982. Administrative cost

Except as provided in sections 1920(c), 1923(d), and 1955(c) of this title, the United States shall bear the cost of administration in connection with this chapter, including expenses for medical examinations, inspections when necessary, printing and binding, and for such other expenditures as are necessary in the discretion of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 85–857, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1165, §782; renumbered §1982 and amended Pub. L. 102–83, §§4(b)(1), (2)(E), 5(a), Aug. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 404–406; Pub. L. 104–99, title II, §201(b), Jan. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 36.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–99 is based on section 107(4) of H.R. 2099, One Hundred Fourth Congress, as passed by the House of Representatives on Dec. 7, 1995, which was enacted into law by Pub. L. 104–99.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–99 substituted "Except as provided in sections 1920(c), 1923(d), and 1955(c) of this title, the United States" for "The United States".

1991—Pub. L. 102–83 renumbered section 782 of this title as this section and substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator".
### §603. Repealed. Mar. 2, 1945, ch. 19, §3, 59 Stat. 23

Section, acts July 25, 1912, ch. 253, §1, 37 Stat. 222; July 3, 1930, ch. 847, §3, 46 Stat. 946; Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 895, §3, 54 Stat. 1200, related to removal of temporary obstructions and to minor improvements in navigable waters. See section 603a of this title.
### **PART IV—PATENT COOPERATION TREATY**

Chap.
Sec.
35.
Definitions
351
36.
International Stage
361
37.
National Stage
371

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Analysis of chapters editorially supplied. Part IV added by Pub. L. 94–131 without adding analysis for chapters 35, 36, and 37.

Pub. L. 96–517 purported to amend the table of chapters of title 35 by adding after the item for chapter 37 the following: "38. Patent Rights in Inventions Made with Federal Assistance". Title 35 did not contain a table of chapters, and section 6(b) of Pub. L. 96–517 and the purported amendment made by it were repealed by Pub. L. 97–256. See chapter 18 (§200 et seq.) of this title.
NO. 07-04-0243-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 27, 2004

	______________________________

	DAVIE HARRISON, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 223RD DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;

	NO. 33,442; HONORABLE LEE WATERS, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Following the dismissal of his civil suit pursuant to chapter 14 of the Texas Civil and Practice Remedies Code, appellant filed a notice of appeal.1  On May 4, 2004, he filed a motion to withdraw his appeal.  Although the signature line on the motion is blank, appellant did sign his transmittal letter in which he indicates he intends to file a motion to withdraw his appeal.  We apply Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to suspend the operation of Rule 9.1(b) which provides that a party without representation must sign any document filed.  Without passing on the merits of the appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

						Don H. Reavis

						    Justice