alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §90104. Officers and employees

(a) Appointment of Officers and Employees.—The board of directors appoints, removes, and replaces officers and employees of the foundation.

(b) Status and Compensation of Employees.—

(1) In general.—Officers and employees of the foundation—

(A) are not employees of the Federal Government (except as may otherwise be provided in this chapter);

(B) shall be appointed and removed without regard to the provisions of title 5 governing appointments in the competitive service; and

(C) may be paid without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5.

(2) Availability of federal employee rates for travel.—For purposes of any schedules of rates negotiated by the Administrator of General Services for the use of employees of the Federal Government who travel on official business, officers and employees of the foundation who travel while engaged in the performance of their duties under this chapter shall be deemed to be employees of the Federal Government.

(Added Pub. L. 107–252, title VI, §601(a), Oct. 29, 2002, 116 Stat. 1719, §152604; renumbered §90104, Pub. L. 113–237, §3(c)(6)(B), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2840.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237 renumbered section 152604 of this title as this section.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification of ChiefFinancial Officer

 

I, Geoffrey M. Boyd,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-K of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact

necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all

material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and

procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over

financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
|   | March 17, 2006 |
|--------|---------------------|
|   |                |   |
|   |                |   |
|   | Sign:               |  /S/       Geoffrey  M. Boyd |   |
|   |                | Geoffrey M. Boyd |   |
|   |                | Chief Financial  Officer |   |

 

----
### §153705. Powers

The corporation may—

(1) adopt and amend a constitution and bylaws for the management of its property and the regulation of its affairs;

(2) adopt and alter a corporate seal;

(3) choose officers as the corporation requires;

(4) make contracts;

(5) acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer property as necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes of the corporation; and

(6) sue and be sued.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1429.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153705 | 36:1004(2)–(8). | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §§4(2)–(8), 18, 76 Stat. 503, 506. |
| | 36:1018. | |

Section

In this section, the text of 36:1018 is omitted as executed and obsolete.

In clause (1), the word "alter" is omitted as included in "amend". The words "not inconsistent with the laws of the United States or any State in which the corporation is to operate" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (2), the word "use" is omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (4), the words "make contracts" are substituted for "contract and be contracted with" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

Clause (5) is substituted for "take by lease, gift, purchase, grants, devise, or bequest from any public body or agency or any private corporation, association, partnership, firm, or individual and to hold absolutely or in trust for any of the purposes of the corporation any property, real, personal, or mixed, necessary or convenient for attaining the objects and carrying into effect the purposes of the corporation" and "transfer, convey, lease, sublease, encumber, and otherwise alienate real, personal, or mixed property" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "subject, however, to applicable provisions of law of any State, (A) governing the amount or kind of property which may be held by, or (B) otherwise limiting or controlling the ownership of property by, a corporation operating in such State" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (6), the words "complain and defend in any court of competent jurisdiction" are omitted as unnecessary.
### §230509. Duty to maintain tax-exempt status

The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1487.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 230509 | 36:3815. | May 23, 1986, Pub. L. 99–318, §16, 100 Stat. 476. |

Section
No. III-10-002 

Contacts: 

Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662 

Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663 

 January 20, 2010 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Web site: www.nrc.gov

 

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT 

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission has selected Stephen Burton as the 

new Senior Resident Inspector at the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant in 

Two Creeks, Wis, roughly 40 miles southeast of Green Bay. 

Most recently, Burton was senior resident inspector at the Kewaunee nuclear 

power plant located in Kewaunee, Wis. He joined the NRC in HQ as a 

reactor engineer in 1996. 

Prior to joining the agency, Burton served more than six years in the Navy. He was a Machinist 

Mate aboard USS Philadelphia. Burton graduated from the University of the State of New York 

with a bachelor’s of science degree in nuclear technology. 

“Stephen Burton is an experienced inspector with a firm commitment to safety. He will help the 

NRC fulfill its mission of protecting people and the environment by helping ensure the Point 

Beach plant operates at the high standards set by the NRC,” Region III Administrator Mark 

Satorius said. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant site has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as 

the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects 

and interacting with plant workers and the public. Burton joins Acting Resident Inspector 

Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh at the plant. Both can be reached at (920) 755-2309. 

### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532
### §190303. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are as provided in its articles of incorporation and bylaws and include—

(1) upholding and defending the Constitution of the United States;

(2) promoting health, prosperity, and scholarship among its members and their dependents and survivors through benevolent programs;

(3) assisting veterans and their dependents and survivors through a service program established for that purpose;

(4) improving conditions for retired enlisted service members, veterans, and their dependents and survivors; and

(5) fostering fraternal and social activities among its members in recognition that cooperative action is required for the furtherance of their common interests.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1449.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190303 | 36:5103. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §1823, 106 Stat. 2584. |

Section

The word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".
# L_2020210EN.01004401.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 74/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement [2020/827]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 6a (Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 L 1513: Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 (OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 L 1513: Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 (OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The following indent is added in point 41 (Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IV to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 L 1513: Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 (OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 L 1513: Directive (EU) 2015/1513 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 (OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1).’

Article 3

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/1513 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 239, 15.9.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### WILLARD C. BEACH AIR BRUSH COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, Appellant v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Thomas E. Archer, Howard Haskins, Tracy F. Brackett, Edward Fox, Sam N. Heyman, Monte Gaffman, Earl R. Quick, James McEvoy and Edward F. Fisher.

No. 11292.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 11,1954.

Decided June 30, 1954.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 7, 1954.

Harold G. Aron, Kew Gardens, N. Y., (Alexander Chananau, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

James D. Carpenter, Jersey City, N. J. (Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, Jersey City, N. J., Drury W. Cooper, New York City, Thomas L. Morrissey, Milton A. Dauber, Jersey City, N. J., on the brief), for appellees.

Before BIGGS,' Chief Judge, and MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM.

For the earlier history of this case see 88 F.Supp. 849, and 118 F.Supp. 242. On the last appeal we reversed an order of the court below denying a motion by the plaintiff to vacate and set aside a judgment of discontinuance with prejudice because it had been entered pursuant to the written consent of counsel for the plaintiff at a time when the authority of the attorney to act for the plaintiff had been withdrawn. We also directed the court below on remand to permit the filing of the defendants’ plea of accord and satisfaction and to hear and dispose of that plea *in limine.*3 Cir., 184 F.2d 569. This has been done and a judgment entered in favor of the defendants 118 F. Supp. 242. No error was committed by the court below. The appeal at bar is without merit. It is time that this prolonged litigation was brought to an end. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed.
§ 1631.36 Fees. ( a ) *Generally.* The Board may condition the production, disclosure, or release of records or the appearance and testimony of a Board employee upon advance payment of a reasonable estimate of the costs to the Board.
( b ) *Fees for records.* Fees for the production, disclosure, or release of records are the same as those charged by the Board in its Freedom of Information Act regulations in subpart A of this part.
( c ) *Fees for oral testimony.* Fees for attendance by a witness will include fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court's rules. If no such fees are prescribed, witness fees will be determined based upon the rule of the Federal district court closest to the location where the witness will appear. Such fees will include cost of time spent by the witness to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( d ) *Fees for written testimony.* For time spent by each employee preparing affidavits or declarations (including declarations to authenticate records), the Board may assess charges at the rate described in § 1631.14(a).
### §153506. Exclusive right to name

The corporation has the exclusive right to use and to allow others to use the name "National Tropical Botanical Garden".

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1426.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153506 | 36:4616. | Aug. 19, 1964, Pub. L. 88–449, §16, 78 Stat. 499; Oct. 28, 1988, Pub. L. 100–539, §1, 102 Stat. 2718. |

Section
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8053

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, 

District Judge. (4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 5, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Scott W. Putney, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marty Lorenzo Wright appeals the district court’s 

order denying his “Motion for Clarification” in which he sought

to contest the court’s earlier order denying his motion for a 

reduction of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Wright, No. 4:95-cr-00039-TEMTEM-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2020006EN.01000601.xml

| 10.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 6/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 6/6

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Georgia on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Georgia on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 3 May 2006, entered into force on 25 February 2008, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 25 February 2008.

---
#### Morton Frackman, Respondent, v. Joseph Frackman et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

40–547 PDF 2007

S. HRG. 110–328

[ERRATA]

HEARING ON PENDING LEGISLATIVE

HEARING

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS 

UNITED STATES SENATE

ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

October 24, 2007

Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

(

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate 

[ERRATA] 

The referenced hearing held before the Senate Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs was inadvertently printed with two typographical 

errors. The hearing’s title should read ‘‘Hearing on Pending Legislation’’ and the year printed should read ‘‘Washington : 2008’’.
### SUBCHAPTER II—UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT LIFE INSURANCE
1

Assessing	the	Effect	of	Five	Gasoline	Properties	on	Exhaust	Emissions	from	LightDuty	Vehicles	certified	to	Tier-2	Standards

Analysis	of	Data	from	EPA	Phase	3

(EPAct/V2/E-89)

Appendix	I.3f

Final	Model	Fitting

Non-methane	Hydrocarbons (NMHC)	(Bag	3)

No. Observations: 837

No. Vehicles: 15 

No. censored measurements: 119

No. missing measurements: 0

No. measurements removed: 0

Model Type: Tobit regression
2

I.3f.1		Model Fitting	based	on	the	11-term	design	model.

Model fitting for the 11-term design model gives results identical to those for the 16-term 

extended model, as presented below.
3

I.3f.2	Model	Fitting	based	on	the	16-term	extended	model.

Models fit for NMHC (Bag 3): (Grand Intercept not fit by Tobit models).

Model Term Notation Model

Full FM61FM8 FM9 FM10 FM11

etOH Ze ● ● ● ● ● ●

Arom Za

● ● ● ● ● ×

RVP Zr ● ● ● ● ● ●

T50 Z5 ● ● ● ● ● ●

T90 Z9 ● ● ● ● ● ●

etOH × etOH ZZee

● ×

T50 × T50 ZZ55 ● ×

etOH × Arom ZZea

● ×

etOH × RVP ZZer ● ● ● ● ● ●

etOH × T50 ZZe5 ● ● ×

etOH × T90 ZZe9 ● ×

Arom × RVP ZZar

● ● ×

Arom × T50 ZZa5 ● ×

Arom × T90 ZZa9 ● ● ● ×

T50 × T90 ZZ59 ● ×

RVP × T90 ZZr9 ● ● ● ● ×

1 Indicates “Full minus 6,” etc.

NMHC (Bag 3): Model fitting history, starting with the 17-term extended model.

Fit Parameters Test with respect to

Previous Model

Model p-1

1

-2lnL Dev. d Pr>χ

2

Full Model 16 2447.661

FM6 10 2448.148 0.487 6 0.998

FM8 8 2449.275 1.127 2 0.569

FM8 7 2449.727 0.452 1 0.501

FM10 6 2450.108 0.381 1 0.537

FM112 5 2450.114 0.006 1 0.938

1 Total number of terms excludes the intercept, as the Tobit

Models do not fit intercepts.

2 Best fit with respect to the 16-term extended model.
4

NMHC (Bag 3): Coefficients and Tests of Effect for the Full and Reduced Models, with respect to 

the 16-term extended model.

Effect Full Model Reduced Model (FM11)

Estimate Std. Err. d.f. t -value Pr>t Estimate Std. Err. d.f. t -value Pr>t

Intercept -5.9827

Z e-0.1038 0.0561 1 3.42 0.064 -0.0581 0.0405 1 2.06 0.15

Z a 0.0007 0.0352 1 0.00000 0.98

Z r-0.0565 0.0474 1 1.42 0.23 -0.0313 0.0355 1 0.78 0.38

Z 5 0.0779 0.0626 1 1.55 0.21 0.1356 0.0427 1 10.09 0.0015

Z 9 0.1517 0.0364 1 17.35 <0.0001 0.1546 0.0321 1 23.23 <0.0001

ZZee -0.0391 0.0652 1 0.36 0.55

ZZ55 -0.0250 0.0533 1 0.22 0.64

ZZea -0.0228 0.0529 1 0.19 0.67

ZZer 0.0769 0.0359 1 4.58 0.032 0.0773 0.0313 1 6.09 0.014

ZZe5 -0.0505 0.0689 1 0.54 0.46

ZZe9 0.0056 0.0423 1 0.02 0.90

ZZar -0.0430 0.0573 1 0.56 0.45

ZZa5 -0.0231 0.0642 1 0.13 0.72

ZZa9 -0.0258 0.0359 1 0.52 0.47

ZZ59 0.0099 0.0478 1 0.040 0.84

ZZr9 0.0329 0.0405 1 0.66 0.42

4.4045

0.9347 0.9358

2

veh

2


EXHIBIT
32.1





ENABLE
HOLDINGS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that:





1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enable Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Enable Holdings,
Inc.




Date:
      August 13, 2010
            
            /s/ Patrick L. NevilleBy:
      Patrick L. NevillePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### Ruth B. Niman, Respondent, v. M. Robert Niman, Defendant. National Foundry Company of New York, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In this matrimonial action, the Special Term, Nassau County, denied appellants' application for an order vacating or modifying subpcenas duces tecum served upon them in this action, in which the issues involving the financial circumstances of the defendant husband are now pending before an official referee. The appellants are not parties to the action, nor are they to be substituted in the place of any party, nor to intervene in the action. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The matter having been remitted to an official referee, and the subpoenas there issued, a motion to quash, if there be merit in such motion, should be made before the referee. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
#### Emma Tyler, Respondent, v. Roger Tyler, Appellant.

Present— Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.