alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the  Securities                  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial                  condition of the Company as of March 31, 2008 and results of operations                  of                  the                  Company for the three months ended March 31,                  2008. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  |                                                                  |                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                                                  | NF                Energy                Saving Corporation of America |
|                                             |                                                             |                       |
| Date: May                15,                2008 | By:                                                         | /s/ Gang                Li |
|                                                  | Chief                Executive Officer                                |
|                                                  |                                                                  |

----
### §10556. Rules of construction

#### (a) No funds to provide firearms or training

No amounts provided as a grant under this subchapter may be used for the provision to any person of a firearm or training in the use of a firearm.

#### (b) No effect on other laws

Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to preclude or contradict any other provision of law authorizing the provision of firearms or training in the use of firearms.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2706, as added Pub. L. 115–141, div. S, title V, §502(6), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1132.)
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

AUG 11 2014 

Mr. Rickie Traeger 

Rockford Scanner 

608 Loves Park Drive 

Loves Park, IL 61 1 1 1 

Dear Mr. Traeger: 

800 Independence Ave .. S w. Washinglon. D.C. 20591 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We are unable to process your request on behalf of Rockford Scanner any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of§ 11.81 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you 

must send us all of the following: 

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an ~xemption. 

• A summary we can publish in the Federal Register, stating: 

• The rule from which you seek the exemption; and 

• A brief description of the nature of the exemption you seek. 

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that§ 11.63(d) requires you to send 

your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Michelle Ferritto 

Acting Manager, Airmen and 

Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Exhibit
      32.2





Ener1,
      Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309





March
      24,
      2006





Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE


Washington,
      DC 20549





Re:
      Certification Of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec.
      1350





Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
      connection with the accompanying Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form
      10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended March 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Gerard Herlihy, Chief Financial Officer
      of Ener1, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            such
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ener1, Inc., for the quarter ended
                March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and








2)
            the
                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
                Ener1,
                Inc., for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                Ener1, Inc.








/s/
                Gerard Herlihy
              Gerard
                Herlihy
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Duly
                Authorized Principal Financial and
              Accounting
                Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Ener1, Inc. and will be
      retained by Ener1, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.





This
      certification is being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Ener1, Inc.’s
      quarterly report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject
      to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
      reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
      except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a
      filing.
B.C.D. 01-59

JUL 0 5 2001

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Western Railroad Association

Railroad Publication Services

Railroad Data Processing Services

Railroad Support Services

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of Western Railroad Association (WRA) (B.A. No. 7234), Railroad

Publication Services (RPS) (B.A. No. 7533), Railroad Data Processing Services

(RDPS) (B.A. No. 7532) and Railroad Support Services (RSS) (B.A. No. 7531) as

employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seep) (RRA) and

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.§ 351, et sea.) (RULA). WRA

was ruled to be an employer under the Acts effective January 1, 1970. RPS, RDPS,

and RSS were all ruled to be railroad employers effective May 1, 1987.

Mr. Clyde V. McIntyre, Director, Marketing Services, CSX Transportation, advised

the Board, in his letter of April 18, 2001, that he is the chairperson of the

Administrative Committee, which consists of representatives from BNSF, CN, CP,

CSXT, NS and UP. Mr. McIntyre was responding to the Board’s inquiry concerning

the status of WRA, RPS, RDPS and RSS as covered employers under the RRA and

Mr. McIntyre reported that WRA ceased operation in 1995, leaving RPS, RDPS and

RSS in operation until December 31, 2000, at which time RPS, RDPS and RSS

ceased operations.

Based on the above information, it is the determination of the Railroad Retirement

Board that Western Railroad Association ceased to be an employer under the RRA

and RULA on December 31, 1995, the last day of the year in which it last operated.

It is further determined that Railroad Publication Services, Railroad Data

Processing Services and Railroad Support Services ceased to be employers under

the Acts administered by the Board on December 31, 2000, the day on which each

entity ceased operations.

RULA.

. Speakman, Jr.

2^4

BA# 7234
### §170505. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(c) Nondiscrimination.—The requirements for holding office in the corporation may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1445.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170505(a) | 36:2506. | July 23, 1984, Pub. L. 98–372, §§5 (words after 3d comma related to discrimination in holding office), 6, 7, 98 Stat. 1239. |
| 170505(b) | 36:2507. | |
| 170505(c) | 36:2505 (words after 3d comma related to discrimination in holding office). | |

Section

In subsections (a) and (b), the words "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States in which it is incorporated" in 36:2506 and "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States wherein it is incorporated" in 36:2507 are omitted as unnecessary.
EXHIBIT
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. ss 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I,
Vanessa Avila, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tortuga Mexican Imports,
Inc.
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to date a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;
 
 4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 (b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control over
financial reporting.
 
 5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls and
procedures for financial reporting.
 
 Date:
July 14, 2009
 
 /S/Vanessa
Avila
 Signature:  Vanessa
Avila
 Title:
  President, Secretary and Director
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
# L_2019307EN.01000201.xml

| 28.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 307/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 307/2

---

Information on the date of signature and provisional application of the Protocol on the implementation of the Agreement on a sustainable fisheries partnership between the European Union and the Republic of Senegal

The European Union and the Republic of Senegal signed on 18 November 2019, in Brussels, the Protocol on the implementation of the Agreement on a sustainable fisheries partnership between the European Union and the Republic of Senegal.

The Protocol accordingly applies provisionally from 18 November 2019 pursuant to Article 16 thereof.

---
§ 550.1204 Projecting the lump-sum leave period. ( a ) A lump-sum payment must equal the pay an employee would have received had he or she remained in the Federal service until the expiration of the accumulated and accrued annual leave to the employee's credit. The agency must project the lump-sum period leave beginning on the first workday (counting any holiday) occurring after the date the employee becomes eligible for a lump-sum payment under § 550.1203 and counting all subsequent workdays and holidays until the expiration of the period of annual leave. The period of leave used for calculating the lump-sum payment must not be extended by any holidays under 5 U.S.C. 6103 (or applicable Executive or administrative order) which occur immediately after the date the employee becomes eligible for a lump-sum payment under § 550.1203; annual leave donated to an employee under the leave transfer or leave bank programs under subparts I and J of part 630 of this chapter; unused compensatory time off earned under 5 U.S.C. 5543 and § 550.114(d) or § 551.531(d) or under 5 U.S.C. 5542(g) and § 550.1625; or credit hours accumulated under an alternative work schedule established under 5 U.S.C. 6126.
( b ) For employees whose annual leave was held in abeyance immediately prior to becoming eligible for a lump-sum payment, the agency must project the lump-sum payment beginning on the first workday occurring immediately after the date the employee becomes eligible for a lump-sum payment under § 550.1203, consistent with paragraph (a) of this section.
[64 FR 36771, July 8, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 58112, Sept. 25, 2015]
#### Truman McDOWELL, Jr., Petitioner, v. Henry N. GRAVEN, Judge United States District Court, Northern District of Iowa, Respondent.

No. 15133.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 21, 1954.

Truman McDowell, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of mandamus against respondent denied and dismissed.
§ 732.201 Sensitivity level designations and investigative requirements. ( a ) For purposes of this part, the head of each agency shall designate, or cause to be designated, any position within the department or agency the occupant of which could bring about, by virtue of the nature of the position, a material adverse effect on the national security as a sensitive position at one of three sensitivity levels: Special-Sensitive, Critical-Sensitive, or Noncritical-Sensitive.
( b ) Investigative requirements for each sensitivity level are provided in OPM issuances.
[56 FR 18654, Apr. 23, 1991, as amended at 66 FR 66711, Dec. 27, 2001]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated March 31, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to uncertainty associated with regulatory actions) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in theRegistration Statements of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp filed on Form S-8 (File No. 333-65634, effective July 23, 2001 and File No. 333-123853, effective April 5, 2005). 

/s/ SQUAR, MILNER, PETERSON, MIRANDA & WILLIAMSON, LLP 

Newport Beach, California 

March 31, 2010
# L_2021067EN.01000101.xml

| 25.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/1

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 123/2018

of 6 July 2018

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement [2021/185]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/313 of 28 February 2018 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the lists of border inspection posts and veterinary units in Traces (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/313 of 28 February 2018 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the lists of border inspection posts and veterinary units in Traces (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein.

| (3) | Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 39 (Commission Decision 2009/821/EC) in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 D 0313: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/313 of 28 February 2018 (OJ L 60, 2.3.2018, p. 40).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 D 0313: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/313 of 28 February 2018 (OJ L 60, 2.3.2018, p. 40).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/313 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 7 July 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 60, 2.3.2018, p. 40.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Board of Directors
Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.
Cheraw, South Carolina

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-79339) of our report dated July
18, 2003 on the consolidated financial statements of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.
and Subsidiary as of and for the years ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, which
appears in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.

/s/ Dixon Odom PLLC

Sanford, North Carolina
September 26, 2003
#### Edward McCormick, Appellee, v. Agnes Downs and M. E. Fleming, Appellants.

Gen. No. 5,839.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lee county; the Hon. Richard S. Farrand, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of tlie Case.

Action by Edward McCormick against Agnes Downs and M. E. Fleming to recover the.price of a colt alleged to have been sold by plaintiff to Agnes Downs. Suit was originally commenced before a justice of the peace where plaintiff had judgment for ninety-five dollars. On appeal to the Circuit Court plaintiff recovered a like judgment. From the judgment of the Circuit Court, defendants appeal.

Brooks & Brooks, for appellants.

Harry Edwards, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Sales, § *18*
      ***
      *—when evidence sufficient to sustain finding that seller assented to terms of sale.*In an action for the price of a colt, *327where the purchaser claimed that she never bought the colt, and that plaintiff did not assent to her proposition to wait until corn shelling time for his pay, a verdict for plaintiff *held*sustained by the evidence.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, san>e jtcpjc and section number.

*326Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

*3272. Fbauds, statute of, § *16*
      ***
      *—when oral promise to pay for goods sold to another is an original promise.*Where a person sent word to another that a colt which the latter had traded for with a third person belonged to him and for him to sell it back to such third person and he would see that the colt was paid for, and a sale was made to such third party in reliance on the promise, *held*that the promise thus made was an original promise not within the statute of frauds, and that the maker of the promise was liable with the purchaser for the price of the colt.