alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §220703. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are as provided in its articles of incorporation and include—

(1) preserving and promoting patriotism and loyalty to the United States of America;

(2) perpetuating and establishing memorials to the memory of shipmates who served aboard United States submarines and gave their lives in submarine warfare during World War II;

(3) promoting the spirit and unity that existed among the United States Navy submarine crewmen during World War II;

(4) fostering general public awareness of life aboard submarines during World War II, through securing, restoring, and displaying the submarines that were in service at that time;

(5) sponsoring annual college scholarships; and

(6) performing acts of charity as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1479.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 220703 | 36:1803. | Nov. 20, 1981, Pub. L. 97–83, §3, 95 Stat. 1094. |

Section

Before clause (1), the words "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".

In clause (1), the words "preserving and promoting" are added for clarity.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2334

ALEXANDER HOUSE APARTMENTS, c/o McShea Management, Inc., Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-03076-DKC)

Submitted: November 5, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raheem Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Geoffrey Townsend Hervey, BREGMAN, BERBERT, SCHWARTZ & GILDAY, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding this case back to state court. Because the remand order was based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca , 516 U.S. 124, 127-28 (1995); Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc. , 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir. 2008); Borneman v.

United States , 213 F.3d 819, 824-25 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal, deny Muhammad’s motion for stay pending appeal and motion to strike, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”** )
      on Form
      10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the **“Report”** ),
      I,
      David R. Bock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/
      David R. Bock


David
      R.
      Bock


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer








March
      16,
      2007
EXHIBIT 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8, File No. 333-46438, of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. of our report
dated January 16, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K.


/s/  KPMG LLP


Providence, Rhode Island
March 25, 2002
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Reactor Oversight Process Annual Self Assessment Performance Metrics (CY2008 Metric Report).

Accession Number: ML090690616

Date Released: Friday, April 3, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML090690628 - Annual Performance Metric Report. (3 page(s), 4/2/2009)
    - ML090550522 - Reactor Oversight Process Annual Self Assessment Performance Metrics (Report for CY 2008. (61 page(s), 4/2/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC SIGNS ARRANGEMENTS AT 

INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission renewed four international arrangements this 

week and signed a new cooperative arrangement with Croatia during the General Conference of 

the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), held in Vienna, Austria. 

The NRC renewed its cooperative arrangements with Greece, Australia, Indonesia and 

France. These arrangements generally allow for the exchange of unclassified technical and 

regulatory information relating to safety, safeguards, physical protection, transportation safety, 

radiation protection, waste management, and the environmental impact of nuclear facilities, 

materials, and activities. 

Both Chairman Dale E. Klein and Commissioner Kristine L. Svinicki attended the 

conference and met with some 25 regulatory counterparts and members of the IAEA Secretariat. 

Chairman Klein also delivered keynote remarks at the Conference's Senior Regulators Meeting. 

 “Arrangements for cooperation with our regulatory counterparts enable us to exchange 

information in areas of mutual interest, encouraging open bilateral dialogue,” said Klein. “These 

arrangements also allow the NRC to provide assistance to countries that may request it by, for 

example, sharing insights into our regulatory processes.” 

 

The IAEA General Conference is the largest annual gathering of IAEA Member States. 

During the week-long conference, representatives have the opportunity to discuss their policies, 

programs and activities in a variety of forums, including large plenary sessions, panel 

discussions, bilateral meetings and exhibit area displays. 

 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-182 October 3, 2008
No. II-08-055 December 5, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4487 

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH SHAW AREVA MOX SERVICES TO DISCUSS 

PERFORMANCE AT MIXED OXIDE FABRICATION FACILITY 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with officials of 

Shaw Areva MOX Services at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, Dec. 15 in Aiken, S.C., to discuss the 

results of the Assessment of Applicant Performance for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication 

Facility currently under construction at the Savannah River site. 

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in the Aiken Municipal Center, 

215 The Alley in Aiken. NRC officials will be available to answer questions from the public 

after the business portion of the meeting. 

The MOX facility, which will be owned by the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear 

Security Administration, is part of an effort to make surplus weapons-grade plutonium into more 

proliferation-resistant forms. Converting the plutonium into MOX fuel will enable it to be used 

in commercial reactors to generate electricity. In the United States, only those reactors 

authorized by the NRC will be permitted to use MOX fuel. 

Copies of the meeting agenda and related documents will be made available 

electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room in Washington, D.C., 

and from the NRC document system (ADAMS), which is accessible from the NRC Web site at 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 96-2800

___________ George F. Cummings, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. J. W. Tippy, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 10, 1996 Filed: December 13, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. George Cummings appeals the district court's 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-038 August 11, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

TO LIMERICK GENERATING STATION 

Samuel L. Hansell has been assigned as the new Nuclear Regulatory Commission senior

resident inspector at the Limerick Generating Station in Sanatoga, Pa. He joins NRC Resident

Inspector Blake Welling at the two-unit site. Hansell replaces Arthur Burritt, who was

reassigned to the NRC Regional Office in King of Prussia. 

NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins said, "Sam Hansell’s extensive

experience and commitment to safety will help the NRC in its mission to ensure that Limerick

continues to meet the high standards we insist upon for reactor operation in the United States."

Hansell first joined the NRC in April 1990 as a licensed operator examiner in Region I. 

In 1998, he was assigned as a resident inspector at Limerick. The following year he was

promoted to senior resident inspector at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station in Berwick, Pa. 

Prior to joining the agency, Hansell worked for PSEG as a reactor operator and senior

reactor operator at Hope Creek nuclear plant in Hancock’s Bridge, N.J., and in the operations

department with Public Service Enterprise Group. 

Hansell is a graduate of Thomas Edison State College in Trenton, N.J., where he earned a

bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering technology. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Limerick resident inspectors can be reached at 610/327-1344.

###
# L_2017161EN.01005101.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/51

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 266/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1055]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1475 of 27 August 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 as regards the transitional measures applying to procedures concerning plant protection products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1475 of 27 August 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 284/2013 as regards the transitional measures applying to procedures concerning plant protection products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13c (Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 R 1475: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1475 of 27 August 2015 (OJ L 225, 28.8.2015, p. 10)’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 R 1475: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1475 of 27 August 2015 (OJ L 225, 28.8.2015, p. 10)’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) 2015/1475 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 225, 28.8.2015, p. 10.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 875.404 What is the effective date of coverage? ( a ) ( 1 ) The effective dates of coverage under special application period enrollments will be announced in a document published in the Federal Register that announces special application period dates.
( 2 ) If you are an active workforce member or the spouse of an active workforce member and you are applying for coverage during a special application period, the workforce member must be actively at work at least 1 day during the calendar week immediately before the week which contains your coverage effective date for your coverage to become effective. You must inform the Carrier if you do not meet this requirement. In the event you do not meet this requirement, the Carrier will issue you a revised effective date, which will be the 1st day of the next month. The workforce member also must meet the actively at work requirement for any revised effective date for coverage to become effective, or you will be issued another revised effective date in the same manner.
( b ) If you enroll at any time outside of a special application period, your coverage effective date is the 1st day of the month after the date your application is approved.
[87 FR 68598, Nov. 16, 2022]
§ 890.1023 Information considered in deciding a contest. ( a ) *Documents and oral and written arguments.* A provider may submit documents and written arguments in opposition to the proposed debarment and/or the length of the proposed debarment, and may appear personally or through a representative before the debarring official to provide other relevant information.
( b ) *Specific factual basis for contesting the proposed debarment.* A provider's oral and written arguments shall identify the specific facts that contradict the basis for the proposed debarment as stated in the notice of proposed debarment. A general or unsupported denial of the basis for debarment does not raise a genuine dispute over facts material to the debarment, and the debarring official shall not give such a denial any probative weight.
( c ) *Mandatory disclosures.* Regardless of the basis for the contest, providers are required to disclose certain types of background information, in addition to any other information submitted during the contest. Failure to provide such information completely and accurately may be a basis for OPM to initiate further legal or administrative action against the provider. The specific items of information that shall be furnished to OPM are: ( 1 ) Any existing, proposed, or prior exclusion, debarment, penalty, or other sanction imposed on the provider by a Federal, State, or local government agency, including any administrative agreement that purports to affect only a single agency;
( 2 ) Any criminal or civil legal proceeding not referenced in the notice of proposed debarment that arose from facts relevant to the basis for debarment stated in the notice; and
( 3 ) Any entity in which the provider has a control interest, as that term is defined in § 890.1003.
Board Coverage Decision

2002-4

B&H Rail Corporation

Name Change - Effective October 16, 2001

Conhoctton Valley Railroad Corp.

has changed its name to

B&H Rail Corp.

No Decision Published

BA# 2134
I

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2161

To require the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to collect and

assess scientific evidence regarding prescription drugs frequently used

by Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 2003

Mr. BEREUTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To require the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

to collect and assess scientific evidence regarding prescription drugs frequently used by Medicare or Medicaid

beneficiaries, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prescription Value

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 2161 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY ON PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FREQUENTLY

2 USED BY MEDICARE OR MEDICAID BENE3 FICIARIES.

4 (a) STUDY.—The Director of the Agency for

5 Healthcare Research and Quality (in this section referred

6 to as the ‘‘Director’’) shall—

7 (1) identify prescription drugs that are fre8 quently used by Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries;

9 (2) collect available scientific evidence regarding

10 the relative clinical appropriateness and cost-effec11 tiveness of such prescription drugs;

12 (3) assess the validity and reliability of such

13 scientific evidence; and

14 (4) identify areas of additional research needed

15 to make an objective determination on the clinical

16 appropriateness and cost-effectiveness of such pre17 scription drugs.

18 (b) EVIDENCE.—In carrying out this section, the Di19 rector shall take into account—

20 (1) any relevant published scientific evidence;

21 and

22 (2) publicly available scientific studies and data

23 submitted by pharmaceutical companies, pharmacy

24 benefit managers, public and private payors, phar25 macies, managed care plans, and other interested

26 parties.
3

•HR 2161 IH

1 (c) DISSEMINATION.—The Director shall disseminate

2 the scientific evidence collected under this section to the

3 Congress, State Medicaid program directors, and the Cen4 ters for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

5 (d) COMMENCEMENT.—The Director shall commence

6 implementation of this section not later than 90 days after

7 the date of the enactment of this section.

8 (e) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the

9 commencement date described in subsection (d), the Di10 rector shall submit to the Congress a report that includes

11 the following:

12 (1) A description of the activities conducted

13 under this section.

14 (2) A recommendation for the modification or

15 expansion of such activities.

16 (3) A description of the applicability of such ac17 tivities on a large scale to Government programs, in18 cluding Medicare and Medicaid.

19 (f) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

20 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

21 $10,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2004 through

22 2005.

Æ
§ 894.806 Can a retiree or Retired Reserve member enroll and cover TEI family members in a FEDVIP dental plan? Generally, yes, since a retiree or Retired Reserve member who is a *sponsor* is also a *TEI-D.* However, if a retiree or Retired Reserve member who is eligible to enroll does not in fact enroll, then the member is not an *enrollee* and cannot cover *TEI family members.* A *TEI certifying family member* may serve as *enrollee* only if the member does not enroll and meets at least one of the following conditions: ( a ) Receives VA dental services;
( b ) Has employer-sponsored dental coverage without a family coverage option; or
( c ) Has a medical or dental condition that prevents him or her from obtaining dental benefits. *See* description of eligibility in § 894.309(a)(3)(iii).
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**








In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Superior Oil and Gas Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Daniel Lloyd, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




****Date: November 17, 2004
By:
/s/ Daniel LloydDaniel LloydChairman and Chief Executive Officer





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.




Exhibit 32
### §21906. Headquarters and meetings

The corporation may have its headquarters and hold its meetings at places the corporation decides are best.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1299.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21906 | 36:3306. | July 5, 1935, ch. 373, §6, 49 Stat. 458. |

Section

The word "may" is substituted for "be, and is hereby, authorized to" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "within or without the District of Columbia" and "from time to time" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### § 844.101 Purpose.

This part establishes the requirements under the Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS) for eligibility to receive a disability annuity, application procedures for disability annuities, rules for computing a disability annuity, and the conditions and procedures under which a disability annuity is terminated and reinstated.