alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC APPROVES LICENSE RENEWAL FOR SHEARON HARRIS 

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the operating license renewal of the 

Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, in North Carolina for an additional 20 years. 

 The Harris plant is a pressurized water reactor located about 20 miles southwest of 

Raleigh, N.C. The operator, Progress Energy, submitted an application for renewal of the license 

Nov. 16, 2006. Their current license would have expired on October 24, 2026; with the renewal, 

the license is extended until Oct. 24, 2046. 

 The NRC’s environmental review for this license renewal is described in a site-specific 

supplement to the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of 

Nuclear Power Plants” (NUREG-1437, Supplement 33). Public meetings to discuss the 

environmental review were held near the plant on April 18, 007 and Jan. 30. The NRC’s review 

was published in August. The review concluded there were no environmental impacts that would 

preclude renewal of the license for environmental reasons. 

 

 After carefully reviewing the plant’s safety systems and specifications, the staff 

concluded that there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the 

applicant had effectively demonstrated the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. The 

“Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Shearon Harris Nuclear Power 

Plant, Unit 1,” was issued in August. In addition, NRC conducted inspections of the plant to 

verify information submitted by the applicant. The reports relating to the Shearon Harris license 

renewal are available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/harris.html. 

 On Oct. 2, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards – an independent body of 

technical experts that advises the Commission – issued its recommendation that license renewal 

for Shearon Harris should be approved. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the 

Safety Aspects of the License Renewal Application for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.” 

This document is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/acrs/letters/2008/. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-226 December 17, 2008
 The Shearon Harris renewed license brings the total number of renewals to 51 reactor 

units. A complete listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
# L_2015230EN.01004501.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 238/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) and Annex XIV (Competition) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1462]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 of 24 June 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 of 24 June 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 906/2009 as regards its period of application (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes XIII and XIV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes XIII and XIV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 10a (Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 R 0697: Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 of 24 June 2014 (OJ L 184, 25.6.2014, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 R 0697: Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 of 24 June 2014 (OJ L 184, 25.6.2014, p. 3).’

Article 2

The following is added in point 11c (Commission Regulation (EC) No 906/2009) of Annex XIV to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 R 0697: Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 of 24 June 2014 (OJ L 184, 25.6.2014, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 R 0697: Commission Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 of 24 June 2014 (OJ L 184, 25.6.2014, p. 3).’

Article 3

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 697/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 184, 25.6.2014, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
No. I-08-039 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

June 6, 2008

 NRC PROPOSES $3,250 CIVIL PENALTY FOR CHESAPEAKE, VA., COMPANY 

FOR STORING NUCLEAR GAUGES AT UNAUTHORIZED LOCATION 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,250 fine for a Chesapeake, 

Va., company for a violation of agency requirements. The violation, by IBS of America, Corp., 

involves a failure to confine the use of nuclear gauges to a location authorized on the company’s 

NRC-issued license. 

 

On Nov. 5, 2007, the NRC conducted an unannounced inspection at the Chesapeake 

offices of IBS, which is a service company to the paper-manufacturing industry. The inspectors 

determined that IBS had ceased principal activities at its facility on Cook Boulevard and was 

now based instead at a facility on Profit Way, even though the firm failed to notify the NRC of 

this change in writing within 60 days, as required. The company was also storing nuclear gauges 

at the Profit Way site when its license did not authorize it to do so at that location. 

The NRC has proposed the civil penalty for the unauthorized storage of the gauges at the 

Profit Way location. In addition, the agency intends to cite, but not fine, IBS for failing to 

provide written notification of its location change, as well as a failure to perform leak tests on 

two gauges at the required 6-month interval. 

“In assessing the significance of the violation, the NRC considered that at the time that 

IBS moved to its new location, two of its gauges had not been recently leak tested, and IBS had 

not performed a final radiation survey of its prior location of use. This created a potential for the 

prior location of use to have been released for unrestricted use with residual contamination 

present,” NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins wrote in a letter to the company 

notifying it of the enforcement action. 

IBS was offered the opportunity to take part in a predecisional enforcement conference 

with NRC staff. It did so on April 17, 2008, and discussed the apparent violations, their 

significance and root causes, and corrective actions taken by the company. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
The company is required to provide the NRC with a response to the enforcement action 

within 30 days. The agency will conduct additional inspections to verify the firm’s 

implementation of its corrective actions. 

 

 ###
#### James Larsen, Appellant, v. Home Owners' Loan Corporation, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 432-433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Alzheimer's.
    Date: February 15, 2019.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).

[[Page 433]]

    Contact Person: David I. Sommers, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 6154, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-7861, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b2f382426262e39380b262a222765252223652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aaced9c5c7c7cfd8d9eac7cbc3c684c4c3c284cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This meeting notice is being published less than 15 days in 
advance of the meeting due to the partial Government shutdown of 
December 2018.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 18, 2019.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-00170 Filed 1-25-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

**Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin **
**Table of Contents**
therefore, we conclude that he fails to demonstrate that the district court

abused its discretion at sentencing. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 1

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Mayfield, Turco & Gruber Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'Although we filed Castro's fast track statement, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief does not contain margins in compliance with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4). Counsel for Castro is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

### See NRAP 3C(n). We deny Castro's request for full briefing and oral argument. 

### See NRAP 3C(k)(1).

r SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A •
### §20202. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Air Force Sergeants Association (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit corporation incorporated in the District of Columbia, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Added Pub. L. 105–354, §1(4)(A), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3239.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20202(a) | 36 App.:5801. | Nov. 18, 1997, Pub. L. 105–85, title XV, §§1501, 1514 (related to termination of charter), 1515, 111 Stat. 1963, 1966. |
| 20202(b) | 36 App.:5813 (related to termination of charter).36 App.:5814. | |

Section

36 App.:5814.

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
### [§§492 to 494. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title VI, §604(a), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1767]

Section 492, added Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VI, §615(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3879, §431; renumbered §432, Pub. L. 100–26, §8(b)(1), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 285; amended Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title IX, §931(c), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1200; renumbered §492 and amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VI, §631(d)(2), (e)(30), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1460, 1464, related to travel of a member under competent orders as an escort for the member's dependent who is incapable of traveling alone because of age, mental or physical incapacity, or other extraordinary circumstances.

Section 494, added Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VI, §623(a)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2422, §434; renumbered §494 and amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title VI, §631(d)(2), (e)(31), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1460, 1464, related to cost of subsistence incurred by the member while performing duties as an escort or member of an arms control inspection team of a foreign country while engaged in activities related to the implementation of an arms control treaty or agreement.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 E0 02 1

. THOMAS EDW ARD MATTI MOE v . KATHRYN D. MATTI MOE.

Th e Pl ai n t i ff/ Ap p el l an t i n t he ab o v e-s t y led cas e h as f i l e d a Ru l e (4 0 )b
Em erg en cy Mo ti o n F o r Ex t en si o n Of Ti m e. Sai d M ot i o n i s h ereb y GRANTED. Pl ai n t i ff/ Ap p el l an t 's ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal i s d u e on Fri day , Decem b er 2 8 , 2 0 1 8

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## November 26, 2018

11/26/2018
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

New Jersey Rail Carrier LLC

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

New Jersey Rail Carrier, LLC (NJRC), as an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §

35ietseg.).

Information regarding NJRC was provided by Darren Rizzo, Managing Member. 

According to Mr. Rizzo, NJRC began doing business May 1, 2004. NJRC reported that

it has no employees as of yet. The two managing members are the only individuals

working on the NJRC.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 34392, NJRC filed a notice of

exemption to acquire by lease and operate approximately one-half mile of rail line 

formerly known as Columbia Terminals. Mr. Rizzo advised that NJRC will interchange

with the Norfolk Southern or CSXT at NJRC’s gate, and then will place the cars into

position to be offloaded or loaded. NJRC will then reassemble the cars and interchange

them with the main line carrier.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as relevant

here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Surface

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49, United States

Code;

Sections i(a) and i(b) ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§§ 35i(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition, as does section 3231 ofthe

Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

The evidence of record establishes that NJRC is a carrier operating in interstate

commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that NJRC is an employer within the meaning

ofsection i(a)(i)(i) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 23i(a)(i)(i)) and the

corresponding provision ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act as of May 1,

2004, the date as of which it commenced operations.

BA#4116
NO. 07-12-00212-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 22, 2012

IN RE JACKIE LEE BIBBS, RELATOR

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Jackie Lee Bibbs, has filed an Original Application for Writ of Mandamus 

requesting this Court issue a writ of mandamus ordering the Honorable George 

Gallagher, Judge of the 396th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, recused from 

participating in Bibbs’s appeal of his conviction for the offense of capital murder in 

cause number 07-10-0300-CR. We dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

This Court has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against a “judge of a 

district or county court in the court of appeals district.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 

22.221(b) (West 2004). Tarrant County is not within the territorial jurisdiction of this 

Court. See id. § 22.201(h) (West Supp. 2011). The extent of our jurisdiction over a 

transferred case is limited to the specific matters that were transferred. See id. § 

73.002 (West 2005). There is no express statutory authority that would permit this 

Court to exercise mandamus jurisdiction over a mandamus proceeding brought against 

a judge of a court sitting in Tarrant County, Texas. See In re Davis, 87 S.W.3d 794, 795 
2

(Tex.App.—Texarkana 2002, orig. proceeding). While this Court may also issue writs of 

mandamus necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the Court, see TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 22.221(a), Bibbs has failed to identify how the issuance of the writ of mandamus he 

seeks would be necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of this Court. 

For the foregoing reasons, we dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

Mackey K. Hancock

Justice
§ 3901.102 Prior approval for practice of a profession. ( a ) *Prior approval requirement.* A professional employee of the FCC shall obtain approval before engaging in the outside practice of the same profession as that of the employee's official position, whether or not for compensation. As used in this section, “profession” has the meaning set forth in § 2636.305(b)(1) of this title, and “professional employee” means an employee whose official FCC position is in a profession as defined in § 2636.305(b)(1) of this title.
( b ) *Procedures for requesting approval.* ( 1 ) A request for approval shall be in writing and shall be submitted, through the following Commission officials, to the Designated Agency Ethics Official or his designee: ( i ) For Heads of Bureaus and Offices, through the Chairman;
( ii ) For employees in the immediate Office of a Commissioner, through the Commissioner; or
( iii ) For all other employees, through the Head of the Bureau or Office to which the employee is assigned.
( 2 ) A request for approval shall include, at a minimum: ( i ) A full description of the services to be performed in practicing the profession;
( ii ) The name and address of the person or organization for which services are to be provided; and
( iii ) The estimated total time that will be devoted to practicing the profession.
( 3 ) Upon a significant change in the nature or scope of the employee's FCC position or the services to be provided in practicing the profession, the employee shall submit a revised request for approval.
( c ) *Standard for approval.* Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the proposed outside practice of the employee's profession is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR 2635.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

NRC TO INCREASE OVERSIGHT AT GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 The R.E. Ginna nuclear power plant will receive additional oversight from the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission based on NRC inspection findings involving the performance of the 

turbine-driven auxiliary feedwater pump. Ginna is operated by Constellation Energy, LLC, and 

located in Ontario, N.Y. 

 The auxiliary feedwater system is a back-up system that, in the event of an accident, is 

one of multiple methods designed to remove heat from the reactor when it is shut down. 

 In an inspection report issued today, an NRC Special Inspection Team sent to the plant to 

look into multiple failures of the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump found that Ginna had 

identified corrosion of a pump component in 2005, but did not take adequate corrective action to 

prevent the recurrence of corrosion. This finding was assessed as “white,” or of low to moderate 

safety significance. Taken together with a “white” finding for a Dec. 2008 pump problem, the 

plant moved into the “degraded cornerstone” column of the NRC’s Action Matrix which calls for 

the plant to have a supplemental NRC inspection. 

 “Overall, Ginna continues to operate safely. However, these findings represent 

performance issues and a trend that needs to be understood and addressed,” said NRC Region I 

Administrator Samuel J. Collins. “The additional oversight inspection by NRC is warranted 

based on the repeated failures of this important plant component.” 

 The additional NRC inspection will provide assurance that the root causes and causes of 

the performance issues are understood, the extent of condition is identified and the corrective 

actions are sufficient to prevent recurrence. The timing of that inspection has not been 

determined. 

 The inspection report will be available shortly on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/listofrpts_body.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

No. I-09-045 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

November 12, 2009 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov