alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §70505. Powers

The corporation may—

(1) adopt and amend bylaws for the management of its property and the regulation of its affairs;

(2) adopt and alter a corporate seal;

(3) choose officers, managers, and agents as the activities of the corporation require;

(4) make contracts;

(5) acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer property as necessary to carry out the purposes of the corporation;

(6) borrow money, issue instruments of indebtedness, and secure its obligations by granting security interests in its property;

(7) sue and be sued; and

(8) do any other act necessary and proper to carry out the purposes of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1352.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70505 | 36:574. | Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 911, §§4, 18, 68 Stat. 797, 800. |
| | 36:588. | |

Section

In this section, the definition of "State" in 36:588 is omitted because the word "State" (which in the source provisions for this chapter only appears in 36:574) is not used in the revised chapter.

In clause (1), the words "apply, and administer" and "not inconsistent with the laws of the United States of America or any State in which the corporation is to operate" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (2), the word "use" is omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (3), the word "activities" is substituted for "business" for consistency in the revised title.

In clause (4), the words "make contracts" are substituted for "contract and be contracted with" to eliminate unnecessary words.

Clause (5) is substituted for "take and hold by lease, gift, purchase, grant, devise, bequest, or otherwise, any property, real or personal, or mixed, necessary for carrying into effect the purposes of the corporation" and "transfer, lease, or convey real or personal property" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "subject to applicable provisions of law of any State (1) governing the amount or kind of real and personal property which may be held by, or (2) otherwise limiting or controlling the ownership of real and personal property by, a corporation operating in such State" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (6), the words "for the purposes of the corporation" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "issue instruments of indebtedness, and secure its obligations by granting security interests in its property" are substituted for "issue bonds or other evidences of indebtedness therefor, and secure the same by mortgage or pledge" for consistency in the revised title. The words "subject to applicable Federal or State laws" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (7), the words "complain and defend in any court of competent jurisdiction" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (8), the words "any other act" are substituted for "any and all acts" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
**Exhibit
31.1** **Section
302 Certification**
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Almon
C. Hall, certify that:
  1.
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nortek,
      Inc.;
 
 2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
      to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: May
10, 2005
 
 
 /s/ Almon
C. Hall
 Name:  Almon C.
Hall
 Title:  Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
### §30311. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1319.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30311 | 36:861. | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §11, 72 Stat. 926. |

Section
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-080 April 18, 2008

NRC ACCEPTS APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTOR AT GRAND GULF 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has docketed, or accepted for review, a combined 

license (COL) application for a new reactor at the Grand Gulf site near Port Gibson, Miss. 

Entergy’s application, submitted Feb. 27, is the seventh COL request the agency has accepted for 

review. 

“The NRC staff has concluded Entergy’s submittal meets our requirements for a full 

review, and we have started their environmental and safety analyses,” said Bill Borchardt, 

Director of the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “We expect this work, as well as a hearing on the 

application, to continue through mid-2011.” 

The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC 

Web site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col/grand-gulf.html . Entergy seeks 

approval to build and operate an Economic and Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) at 

the site, approximately 25 miles south of Vicksburg. 

The NRC currently is reviewing the ESBWR design for possible certification. The staff 

will consider any findings concerning the design during the review of the Grand Gulf 

application, which is the second to reference the 1,500 MWe ESBWR. Information on the 

ESBWR application is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newlicensing/design-cert/esbwr.html . 

Docketing the Grand Gulf application does not indicate whether the Commission will 

approve or reject the request. The docket number established for this application is 52-024. The 

NRC will shortly issue in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to participate, or 

“intervene,” in a hearing on the application. Petitions to intervene in a hearing may be filed 

within 60 days of the notice, by anyone whose interest may be affected by the proposed license 

and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. 

 

The NRC is currently reviewing COL applications for reactors at six other locations: 

• the Lee site in South Carolina; 

• the South Texas Project site in Texas; 

• the Bellefonte site in Alabama; 
• the North Anna site in Virginia; 

• the Calvert Cliffs site in Maryland, and; 

• the Shearon Harris site in North Carolina. 

The agency is also conducting an acceptance review on an application for the Vogtle site 

in Georgia. The agency will in the near future conduct a review on an application for the 

Summer site in South Carolina. The NRC expects 10 more applications in 2008. Information 

about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 831.203 Continuation of coverage for employees of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. ( a ) Permanent Federal Aviation Administration employees assigned to Washington National Airport or Dulles International Airport who elect to transfer to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, retain their retirement coverage under subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code.
( b ) *Eligibility requirements.* To be eligible for continuation of retirement coverage, an employee must ( 1 ) be a permanent Federal Aviation Administration employee assigned to the Metropolitan Washington Airports who elects to transfer to the Airports Authority;
( 2 ) be subject to subchapter III chapter 83 of title 5 United States Code on the day before the date the lease takes effect; and
( 3 ) become continually employed by the Airports Authority without a break in service. A “break in service” means a separation from employment of at least 3 calendar days.
( c ) *Employee deductions.* Employees of the Airports Authority who have continuing coverage under title 5 retirement provisions are deemed to consent to deductions from their basic pay for the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund. The amounts deducted will be the same as if the employees were still employed by the Federal Government. The Airports Authority must, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund the amounts deducted from an employee's pay.
( d ) *Employer contributions.* The Airports Authority must, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund amounts equal to any agency contributions that would be required for employees covered by the Civil Service Retirement System.
( e ) *Sick leave.* An employee who retires, or dies leaving a survivor entitled to an annuity, from the Airports Authority within the 5 year period beginning on the date the lease takes effect will be permitted to credit unused sick leave in his or her annuity computation. After the 5 year period, use of unused sick leave in the annuity computation will be permitted if the employee is under a formal leave system as defined in § 831.302.
[52 FR 19125, May 21, 1987, and 53 FR 10055, Mar. 29, 1988. Redesignated at 53 FR 10055, Mar. 29, 1988]
#### § 720.302 Definition.

As used in this subpart, the terms *veteran* and *disabled veteran* have the meanings given to these terms in title 38 of the United States Code.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0137 - Proposed Rule:  Limiting the Quantity of Byproduct Material in A Generally Licensed Device (RIN 3150-AI33)

Accession Number: ML081980563

Date Released: Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML081980662 - SECY-08-0137 - Proposed Rule:  Limiting the Quantity of Byproduct Material in A Generally Licensed Device (RIN 3150-AI33) (8 page(s), 9/16/2008)
    - ML081990243 - SECY-08-0137 - Enclosure 1:  Federal Register Notice re:  Proposed Rule:  Limiting the Quantity of Byproduct Material in A Generally Licensed Device (RIN 3150-AI33) (34 page(s), 9/15/2008)
    - ML081990265 - SECY-08-0137 - Enclosure 2:  Regulatory Analysis re:  Proposed Rule to Limit the Amount of Activity of Byproduct Material Allowed In A Generally Licensed Device (30 page(s), 7/1/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65227-65228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25081]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--North American Electric Reliability Council

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), North American Electric 
Reliability Council, a New Jersey nonprofit corporation (``NERC''), has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal 
place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the 
nature and scope of its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting

[[Page 65228]]

the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: North 
American Electric Reliability Council, Princeton, NJ. The nature and 
scope of NERC's standards development activities are: NERC's standards 
development activities encompass the full range of matters affecting 
the planning and reliable operation of the bulk electric system in 
North America, including matters relating to cyber and physical 
security. NERC's standards development activities include all aspects 
of standards development, including compliance assessment activities. 
NERC's standards development process is accredited by the American 
National Standards Institute.
    Additional information with respect to NERC's standards development 
activities, including the full text of NERC's current standards and the 
standards under development, may be obtained from NERC's Web site: 
http://www.nerc.com.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25081 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NUMBER 13-23-00392-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

WILLIAM ARIC KRAUSE, INDEPENDENT 

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

LINDA K. KRAUSE, DECEASED, AND AS 

TRUSTEE OF THE LINDA K. KRAUSE 

LIVING TRUST, PATRISHA K. SALDIVAR, 

AS TRUSTEE OF LINDA K. KRAUSE 

MINERAL TRUST, AND LINDA K. KRAUSE 

FARM, LLC, WILLIAM ARIC KRAUSE, 

AS TRUSTEE OF THE LINDA K. KRAUSE 

MINERAL TRUST, Appellants,

 v.

MICHAEL KRAUSE, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE 24TH DISTRICT COURT 

OF DEWITT COUNTY, TEXAS

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña 

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
2

This matter is before the Court on an agreed motion to reinstate and dismiss

appeal. The parties have settled the disputes between them and request the dismissal of 

this appeal.

The Court, having considered the agreed motion, is of the opinion that the agreed

motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (2). The motion to reinstate and 

dismiss is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby reinstated and dismissed. 

Pursuant to the agreement within the agreed motion, costs are taxed against the 

party incurring the same. See id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court 

will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, 

no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice

Delivered and filed on the

13th day of June, 2024.
§ 838.242 Computing lengths of service. ( a ) ( 1 ) The smallest unit of time that OPM will calculate in computing a formula in a court order is a month, even where the court order directs OPM to make a more precise calculation.
( 2 ) If the court order states a formula using a specified simple or decimal fraction other than twelfth parts of a year, OPM will use the specified number to perform simple mathematical computations.
( b ) Unused sick leave is counted as “creditable service” on the date of separation for an immediate CSRS or FERS annuity. The unused sick leave of a phased retiree is counted as “creditable service” on the date of separation of the phased retiree to enter full retirement status. Unused sick leave is not apportioned over the time when earned.
[57 FR 33574, July 29, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 46626, Aug. 8, 2014]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6254

SHERRI PROVINCE, a/k/a Sherri Province Shelburne,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-94-567-R)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: June 14, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherri Province, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising

jurisdiction upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 636(c)(1) (West 1993).

2

PER CURIAM:

Sherri Province appeals from the magistrate judge's order

denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion.* We have

reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

magistrate judge. Province v. United States, No. CA-94-567-R (W.D.

Va. Jan. 11, 1995). We deny Province's motion to hold this appeal

in abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 07-095             July 31, 2007

NRC STAFF APPROVES TRANSFER OF POINT BEACH OPERATING LICENSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved the transfer of the operating license forthe Point Beach Nuclear Plant from owner Wisconsin Electric Power Company and operator NuclearManagement Company, to new owner FPL Energy Point Beach, LLC. As provided by NRCregulations, the staff's approval of the transfer is effective July 31, contingent on the licensee receivingcertain regulatory and judicial approvals.

Wisconsin Electric Power Company and Nuclear Management Company submitted anapplication on Jan. 26, requesting approval of the license transfer. Major issues considered by the NRCincluded financial and technical qualifications, as well as transfer and maintenance of accumulateddecommissioning funds. The license transfer also authorizes FPL Energy Point Beach to store spentfuel at Point Beach’s Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation.

A copy of the NRC's approval order and accompanying non-proprietary safety evaluation reportwill be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,Room O-1 F23, Rockville, MD 20852 (telephone 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737). The non-proprietary safety evaluation will also be available on the NRC’s Agency-wide Documents Access andManagement System (ADAMS), by entering ML071560124 at this address:http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. Help in using ADAMS is available by calling the PublicDocument Room.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
#### § 847.809 What effect will NAFI service used to qualify for an immediate retirement have on the amount of the CSRS or FERS annuity?

The annuity of a CSRS or FERS employee who elects to credit NAFI service under this subpart will be reduced under the provisions outlined in subpart I of this part.
#### § 724.403 Advisory guidelines.

OPM will issue advisory guidelines to Federal agencies incorporating the best practices identified under § 724.402 that agencies may follow to take appropriate disciplinary actions against employees for conduct that is inconsistent with Federal Antidiscrimination Laws and Whistleblower Laws.
§ 842.211 Senior Executive Service, Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service, and Senior Cryptologic Executive Service. ( a ) A member of the Senior Executive Service, the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service, or the Senior Cryptologic Senior Executive Service who is removed or who resigns after receipt of written notice of proposed removal for less than fully successful executive performance, or for failure to be recertified as a senior executive, is entitled to an annuity— ( 1 ) After completing 25 years of service; or
( 2 ) After becoming age 50 and completing 20 years of service.
( b ) *Removed for less than fully successful executive performance* means ( 1 ) with respect to a member of the Senior Executive Service, removal in accordance with procedures in subpart E of part 359 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) with respect to a member of the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service or the Senior Cryptologic Executive Service, a certification by the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency or National Security Agency (or their designees) that the employee has been removed for less than fully successful executive performance.
( c ) *Removed for failure to be recertified as a senior executive* means ( 1 ) With respect to a member of the Senior Executive Service, removal in accordance with the procedures in subpart C of part 359 of this chapter, and
( 2 ) with respect to a member of the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service or the Senior Cryptologic Executive Service, a certification by the head of the Defense Intelligence Agency or National Security Agency (or their designees) that the employee has been removed for failure to be recertified under 10 U.S.C. 1601(a) or section 12(a)(1) of the National Security Agency Act, respectively.
( d ) An annuity payable under paragraph (a) of this section commences on the day after separation from service.
[52 FR 4473, Feb. 11, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 173, Jan. 3, 1991]