alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 848.201 Eligibility. ( a ) A retirement-eligible employee, as defined in paragraphs (b) and (c), may elect to enter phased retirement status if the employee has been employed on a full-time basis for not less than the 3-year period ending on the effective date of phased retirement status under § 848.203.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a retirement-eligible employee means an employee who, if separated from the service, would meet the requirements for retirement under subsection (a) or (b) of 5 U.S.C. 8412.
( c ) A retirement-eligible employee does not include— ( 1 ) A member of the Capitol Police or Supreme Court Police, or an employee occupying a law enforcement officer, firefighter, nuclear materials courier, air traffic controller, or customs and border protection officer position, except a customs and border protection officer who is exempt from mandatory separation and retirement under 5 U.S.C. 8325 pursuant to section 535(e)(2)(A) of Division E of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110-161;
( 2 ) An individual eligible to retire under 5 U.S.C. 8412(d) or (e): or
( 3 ) An employee covered by a special work schedule authority that does not allow for a regularly recurring part-time schedule, such as a firefighter covered by 5 U.S.C. 5545b or a nurse covered by 38 U.S.C. 7456 or 7456A.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1848 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1848

  To afford students and parents with private civil remedies for the 
     violation of their privacy rights under the General Education 
                            Provisions Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To afford students and parents with private civil remedies for the 
     violation of their privacy rights under the General Education 
                            Provisions Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Privacy Protection Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. REMEDY ESTABLISHED.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act 
(20 U.S.C. 1232g) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(k) Private Remedies.--
            ``(1) Actions authorized.--No educational agency or 
        institution subject to the requirements of this section shall 
        deprive any parent or student (or person applying for admission 
        as a student) of any of the rights of privacy of and access to 
        educational records established by this section. Any such 
        parent, student, or person aggrieved by an action or inaction 
        in violation of this section or the regulations thereunder by 
        such an educational agency or institution may bring, in an 
        appropriate United States district court--
                    ``(A) an action based on a violation of this 
                section or the regulation prescribed thereunder to 
                enjoin such violation;
                    ``(B) an action to recover damages from such a 
                violation, as determined by the court; or
                    ``(C) both such actions.
            ``(2) Treble damages.--If the court finds that the 
        defendant willfully or knowingly violated this section or the 
        regulations thereunder, the court may, in its discretion, 
        increase the amount of the award under paragraph (1) to not 
        more than 3 times the amount available under subparagraph (B) 
        of such paragraph .''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Directors
I-trax, Inc.


We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 16, 2004,
except for Note 19, as to which the date is March 19, 2004, included in this
Form 10-KSB/A, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on
Amendment No. 1 to Forms S-3 (No. 333-108191), Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 (No.
333-110891), and Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (No. 333-114604).




GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

June 2, 2004
#### Martin Boyle v. George A. Fuller Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc. (the Company), each certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of
this certification:



| | 1. | The annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/  Nancy K. HedrickNancy K. HedrickChief Executive OfficerDate: March 25, 2011/s/   David B. DechantDavid B. DechantChief Financial OfficerDate: March 25, 2011
### §110110. Service of process

The corporation shall comply with the law on service of process of each State in which it is incorporated and each State in which it carries on activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1368.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110110 | 36:2704. | Aug. 21, 1984, Pub. L. 98–391, §4, 98 Stat. 1359. |

Section

The words "in furtherance of its corporate purposes" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit
      32.1





BEERE
      FINANCIAL EQUITY CORP


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Beere Financial Equity Corp (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve
      Lane, the President and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Steve LaneSteve
                LanePresidentNovember
                19, 2008





The
      foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any
      other
      purpose.
§ 1216.102 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests to current and former employees, advisors, and consultants for factual or expert testimony relating to official information or official duties or for production of official records or information, in legal proceedings in which the MSPB is not a named party. This part does not apply to: ( a ) Demands upon or requests for an MSPB employee to testify as to facts or events that are unrelated to his or her official duties or that are unrelated to the functions of the MSPB;
( b ) Demands upon or requests for a former MSPB employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at the MSPB;
( c ) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a; or
( d ) Congressional demands and requests for testimony, records or information.
PUBLIC LAW 107–51—OCT. 16, 2001 115 STAT. 267

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 42 (S.J. Res. 18):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Oct. 2, considered and passed House.

Oct. 4, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–51

107th Congress

Joint Resolution

Memorializing fallen firefighters by lowering the American flag to half-staff in

honor of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

Whereas 1,200,000 men and women comprise the American fire

and emergency services;

Whereas the fire and emergency services is considered one of the

most dangerous jobs in the United States;

Whereas fire and emergency services personnel respond to over

16 million emergency calls annually, without reservation and

with little regard for their personal safety;

Whereas fire and emergency services personnel are the first to

respond to an emergency, whether it involves a fire, medical

emergency, spill of hazardous materials, natural disaster, act

of terrorism, or transportation accident;

Whereas approximately one-third of all active fire and emergency

personnel suffer debilitating injuries annually; and

Whereas approximately 100 fire and emergency services personnel

die annually in the line of duty: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That each year,

the American flags on all Federal office buildings will be lowered

to half-staff in honor of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial

Service in Emmitsburg, Maryland.

Approved October 16, 2001.

36 USC 151302

note.

Oct. 16, 2001

[H.J. Res. 42]
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Adira Energy Ltd. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(i) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: February 2, 2011 | /s/Gadi Levin                
|---------------------- | -----------------------------
|                       | Gadi Levin                   
|                       | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       | (principal financial officer)

---
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

I, Nicholas Plessas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Green Dolphin SystemCorporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the issuer
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectives of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

|*/s/ Nicholas Plessas*

**Nicholas PlessasPresident and Chief Executive  OfficerDate April 15, 2005                                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 2421.5 Primary national subdivision.

*Primary national subdivision* of an agency means a first-level organizational segment which has functions national in scope that are implemented in field activities.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000032 13-DEC-2013 08:24 AM
**Exhibit 15.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114188 on Form F-3 of Air France-KLM of our report datedOctober 28, 2005, except for notes 24 and 25 as to which the date is July 5, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements as of July 31, 2005 (such report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatoryparagraph referring to the fact that International Financial Reporting Standards vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that the application of the latter would haveaffected the determination of consolidated net income for the seven month period ended July 31, 2005, and the determination of consolidated shareholders’ equity and financial position as of July 31, 2005, to the extent summarized inNote 25) of Amadeus Global Travel Distribution, S.A. and its subsidiaries, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Air France-KLM for the year ended March 31 2007. 

 

 

/s/ DELOITTE, S.L. 

 

Madrid, Spain 

July 5, 2007
Board Coverage Decision

2010-11

Rarus Railway Company

Name Change - Effective July 16, 2007

Rarus Railway Company 

has changed its name to

Rarus Railway Company D/B/A Butte, Anaconda & Pacific

Railway Company

No Decision Published

BA # 3649
#### D. C. Miller, Appellant, v. Eva S. Liljerstrom, Appellee.

Gen. No. 5,834.

(Not to Tbe reported in full.)

Appeal from the County Court of Knox county; the Hon. R. C. Rice, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action in *assumpsit*by D. C. Miller against Eva S. Liljerstrom to recover one-half the value of real estate which defendant took as sole devisee named in the will of her father. It appeared that defendant—an uneducated woman, was an illegitimate child and had been living with her father and was recognized and treated as his daughter, and that the father, unfamiliar with business affairs, neglected to make a will in her favor. She discussed the matter with plaintiff, who was an attorney, and he drafted a paper for her father to sign which was entitled “The acknowledging and owning of a child,” but the signature was not obtained. Plaintiff claims that afterwards through a mutual friend he induced the father to make a will leaving his property to defendant and that he had an oral agreement with her that he should receive one-half the value of the property he might thus obtain for her. The jury found for the defendant and judgment was entered on the verdict. From the judgment, plaintiff appeals.

R. C. Hunt, for appellant.

Hardy, Welsh & Hardy and E. A. Corbin, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

*276Abstract of the Decision.

Attobney and client, § *135*
      ***
      *—when evidence insufficient to establish contract for compensation.*In an action by an attorney to recover one-half the value of real estate which plaintiff took as devisee in the will of her father, plaintiff claimed he was entitled thereto under an oral contract with defendant that he should receive one-half of defendant’s father’s property he might obtain for her by inducing the father to own that defendant was his child and inducing the father to make a will devising his property to defendant. *Held*that a verdict for defendant on conflicting evidence whether defendant made such a contract would not be disturbed.
§ 831.502 Automatic separation; exemption. ( a ) When an employee meets the requirements for age retirement on any day within a month, he is subject to automatic separation at the end of that month. The department or agency shall notify the employee of the automatic separation at least 60 days in advance of the separation. If the department or agency fails through error to give timely notice, the employee may not be separated without his consent until the end of the month in which the notice expires.
( b ) The head of the agency, when in his or her judgment the public interest so requires, may exempt a law enforcement officer, firefighter, nuclear materials courier, or customs and border protection officer from automatic separation until that employee becomes 60 years of age.
( c ) The Secretary of Transportation and the Secretary of Defense, under such regulations as each may prescribe, may exempt an air traffic controller having exceptional skills and experience as a controller from automatic separation until that controller becomes 61 years of age.
( d ) When a department or agency lacks authority and wishes to secure an exemption from automatic separation for one of its employees other than a Presidential appointee, beyond the age(s) provided by statute, i.e., age 60 for a law enforcement officer, firefighter, nuclear materials courier, or customs and border protection officer, and age 61 for an air traffic controller, the department or agency head shall submit a recommendation to that effect to OPM. ( 1 ) The recommendation shall contain: ( i ) A statement that the employee is willing to remain in service;
( ii ) A statement of facts tending to establish that his/her retention would be in the public interest;
( iii ) The period for which the exemption is desired, which period may not exceed 1 year; and,
( iv ) The reasons why the simpler method of retiring the employee and immediately reemploying him or her is not being used.
( 2 ) The recommendation shall be accompanied by a medical certificate showing the physical fitness of the employee to perform his or her work.
( e ) OPM may approve an exemption only before the automatic separation date applicable to the employee. For this reason, the department or agency shall forward the recommendation to OPM at least 30 days before this separation date.
[76 FR 41997, July 18, 2011]
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JUNE 10, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-15836

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00149-CR-CAP-3-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDWARD LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(June 10, 2009)

Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Edward Lopez in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Lopez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Matthew B. Ferguson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FoxHollow Technologies, Inc.

Date: November 9,
2006



By:

/s/ MATTHEW B. FERGUSONMatthew B. Ferguson Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
                                                             330 E. Warm Springs
                                                             Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                                    702.528.1984
                                                             425.928.2877 (efax)


May 24, 2001


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of G. Brad Beckstead, CPA, consents to the inclusion of my report of
May 24, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Dicut, Inc. from the inception date
of May 31, 1994 through March 31, 2001, in any filings which are necessary now
or in the near future to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Signed,


/s/ G. BRAD BECKSTEAD

G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
### SUBCHAPTER VII—PHILIPPINE COMMONWEALTH ARMY AND PHILIPPINE SCOUTS