alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2170

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit desecration of Veterans’ 

memorials. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2003

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. KELLY, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. 

ISRAEL, Mr. MCNULTY, and Mr. OWENS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit 

desecration of Veterans’ memorials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Memorials 

5 Protection Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DESECRATION OF VETERANS’ MEMORIALS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2

•HR 2170 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 1369. Desecration of veterans’ memorials 

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in sub3 section (b), willfully injures or commits any depredation 

4 against any structure, plaque, statue, or other monument 

5 on public property commemorating the service of any per6 son or persons in the armed forces of the United States, 

7 shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 

8 10 years, or both, but if the damage or attempted damage 

9 does not exceed the sum of $1,000, the defendant shall 

10 be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one 

11 year, or both. 

12 ‘‘(b) The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) 

13 is that in committing the offense, the defendant travels 

14 or causes another to travel in interstate or foreign com15 merce, or uses the mail or an instrumentality of interstate 

16 or foreign commerce.’’. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

18 at the beginning of chapter 65 of title 18, United States 

19 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘1369. Desecration of veterans’ memorials.’’.

Æ
### §424. Band leaders

(a) The leader of the Army Band is entitled to the allowances of a captain in the Army.

(b) The leader of the United States Navy Band is entitled to the allowances of a lieutenant of the Navy.

(c) A member of the Marine Corps who is appointed as director or assistant director of the United States Marine Corps Band under section 8287 of title 10, is entitled, while serving thereunder, only to the allowances of an officer in the grade in which he is serving. However, his allowances may not be less than those to which he was entitled at the time of his appointment under that section.

(d) The leader of the Naval Academy Band is entitled to the allowances of the pay grade prescribed for him by the Secretary of Navy under section 207(e) of this title. The second leader is entitled to the allowances of a warrant officer, W–1.

(e) The director of the Coast Guard Band is entitled to the allowances of an officer in the grade in which he is serving. However, his allowances may not be less than those to which he was entitled at the time of his appointment as director.

(Pub. L. 87–649, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 480; Pub. L. 89–189, §3, Sept. 17, 1965, 79 Stat. 820; Pub. L. 95–551, §3(b)(2), Oct. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 2069; Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §809(m)(4), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1843.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 424(a) | 10:3536(b) (less applicability to basic pay). | [None.] |
| 424(b) | 10:4338(a) (as applicable to allowances). | [None.] |
| 424(c) | 10:6221(b) (less applicability to basic pay). | [None.] |
| 424(d) | 10:6222(e) (less applicability to basic pay). | [None.] |
| 424(e) | 10:6969(b) (less last sentence, and less applicability to basic pay). | [None.] |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–232 substituted "section 8287 of title 10" for "section 6222 of title 10".

1978—Subsecs. (b) to (f). Pub. L. 95–551 redesignated subsecs. (c) to (f) as (b) to (e), respectively. Former subsec. (b), which provided that the director of music at the United States Military Academy be entitled to allowances of a commissioned officer of the rank prescribed for the director by the Secretary of the Army, was struck out.

1965—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 89–189 added subsec. (f).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0063 - Fiscal Year 2006 Results of the Industry Trends Program for Operating Power Reactors and Status of the Ongoing Development of the Program

Accession Number: ML070660090

Date Released: Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML070660078 - SECY-07-0063 - Fiscal Year 2006 Results of the Industry Trends Program for Operating Power Reactors and Status of the Ongoing Development of the Program (5 page(s), 4/3/2007)
    - ML070660099 - SECY-07-0063 Enclosure 1 - FY 2006 Long Term Industry Trends Results (8 page(s), 4/3/2007)
    - ML070660115 - SECY-07-0063 Enclosure 2 - FY 2006 Short Term Industry Trends Results (7 page(s), 4/3/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 31.2

  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES AND
                              EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Shannon W. Farrington, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this amendment to annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of
         I-trax, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
         to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
         covered by this report; and

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this report, fairly present in all material
         respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
         of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this report.

Date:    June 2, 2004                     /s/ Shannon W. Farrington
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Name:    Shannon W. Farrington
                                          Title:   Chief Financial Officer
### §70301. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "State" includes the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1349.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70301 | 36:2213. | Jan. 8, 1983, Pub. L. 97–427, §14, 96 Stat. 2267. |

Section

The words "the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico" are omitted as included in "the territories and possessions of the United States".
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-007 January 17, 2007

NRC RENEWS OPERATING LICENSE FOR 

PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating license of the Palisades

Nuclear Plant for an additional 20 years.

The Palisades plant is located 5 miles south of South Haven, Mich. The licensee, Nuclear

Management Co., submitted its license renewal application March 22, 2005. With the renewal, the

license is extended until March 24, 2031.

The NRC’s environmental review for this license renewal is described in a site-specific

supplement to the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear

Power Plants” (NUREG-1437, Supplement 27), issued last October. The review concluded there were

no environmental impacts that would preclude renewal of the license for environmental reasons. Public

meetings to discuss the environmental review were held near the plant July 28, 2005, and April 5,

2006.

After carefully reviewing the plant’s safety systems and specifications, the staff concluded that

there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had

demonstrated the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. The “Safety Evaluation Report

Related to the License Renewal of the Palisades Nuclear Plant” was published last September. In

addition, NRC conducted inspections of the plant to verify information submitted by the licensee. The

reports relating to the Palisades renewal are available on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/palisades.html .

On Nov. 17, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards - an independent body of technical

experts which advises the Commission - issued its recommendation that the operating license for

Palisades be renewed. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the Safety Aspects of the

License Renewal Application for the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant.” This document is available on

the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2006/ .
The Palisades renewal brings the total number of operating license renewals to 48 reactor units.

A complete listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 File Nos. 333-105313 and 333-98625 of First Security Bancorp, Inc. of our
      report dated February 24, 2006 on the consolidated financial statements of
      First
      Security Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the years then
      ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.







/s/
      BKD, LLP


BKD,
      LLP


Indianapolis,
      Indiana


March
      27,
      2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7690

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

COURTNEY HUGH WALKER, a/k/a Gary Walker,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-94-18, CA-96-293-2)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtney Hugh Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We interpret Walker's informal brief filed on January 28,

1997, to serve as his notice of appeal of the January 8, 1997,

district court order. Walker's informal brief may serve as a notice

of appeal because it was filed within the appeal period of the

January 8, 1997, order and meets the Fed. R. App. P. 3(c) content

requirements. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-49 (1992).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-94-18; CA-96-293-2 (M.D. N.C. Jan.

8, 1997).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 845.209 Referral for litigation.

From time to time and in a manner consistent with the General Accounting Office's and the Justice Department's instructions, OPM will refer certain overpayments to the Justice Department for litigation. Referral for litigation will suspend processing under this subpart.
### **CHAPTER 1504—NATIONAL AMERICAN INDIAN VETERANS, INCORPORATED**

Sec.
150401.
Organization.
150402.
Purposes.
150403.
Membership.
150404.
Board of directors.
150405.
Officers.
150406.
Nondiscrimination.
150407.
Powers.
150408.
Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges.
150409.
Restrictions.
150410.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
150411.
Records and inspection.
150412.
Service of process.
150413.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
150414.
Failure to comply with requirements.
150415.
Annual report.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0808 Directorate Identifier: 2010

-NM

- 170

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

5.0 $ 425.00 $ 425.00 41 $17,425.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in co mpliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $17,425 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condi** **tion Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 

### $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexib ility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appr opriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
Exhibit 32.1





IDI Global, Inc.



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

18 U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned executive officers of IDI Global, Inc. (the Company) certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





1.

the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: April 20, 2006

/s/ Kevin R. Griffith

Kevin R. Griffith

Chief Executive Officer









Date: April 20, 2006

/s/ Steven D. Weatherly

Steven D. Weatherly

Consultant performing certain services for the

Company commonly performed by a Chief Financial

Officer
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD TO HOLD PRE-HEARING 

CONFERENCE ON YUCCA MOUNTAIN SEPT. 14-15 IN LAS VEGAS 

An Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hold a pre-hearing conference Sept. 

14-15 in Las Vegas to discuss scheduling and other case management issues for the 

adjudicatory hearing on the Department of Energy’s license application for the proposed 

Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. 

 The conference will be held at the Las Vegas Hearing Facility, Pacific Enterprise 

Plaza, Building 1, 3250 Pepper Lane, Las Vegas, beginning at 9 a.m. Pacific Time on 

Sept. 14. The conference will continue on Sept. 15 only if needed. 

 The conference will be viewable by videoconference from the NRC’s hearing 

room at agency headquarters at Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 

Md. The conference will also be Web streamed live at 

http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=61553 on Sept. 14 and 

http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=61554 on Sept. 15 if needed. 

 The board issued an order Aug. 25 establishing an agenda for the conference. 

Among the issues to be discussed are scheduling for discovery and arguments on 

contentions in response to the NRC staff’s decision to issue its Safety Evaluation Report 

on the license application serially, rather than all at once. 

 Media wishing to attend the conference, either in Las Vegas or Rockville, are 

encouraged to register in advance with NRC’s Office of Public Affairs by calling (301) 

415-8200. Pre-registration is essential for television media, as space inside the hearing 

room is limited. Photographers (video or still) will not be permitted to move around the 

hearing room while the board is in session. ASLB judges will not grant interviews. No 

interviews of other participants shall be permitted inside the hearing facility. Two 

brochures on the Las Vegas Hearing Facility – one for media and one for the general 

public – are available on the NRC’s Web site at this address: http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-150 September 8, 2009
### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting 

should contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
NRC AFFIRMS ADJUDICATORY DECISIONS 

 Today the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission affirmed eight decisions on adjudicatory 

matters. 

 “I am pleased that the Commission has reached resolution on these long-standing issues,” 

said NRC Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko. “I look forward to continuing progress on our important 

work in ensuring public health and safety and protecting the environment.” 

The Commission acted on orders in the following matters: 

• Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corp. (License Amendment Request for Decommissioning of The 

Newfield, New Jersey Site) 

• South Carolina Electric & Gas Co & South Carolina Public Service Authority (Also 

Referred to as Santee Cooper) (Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Units 2 and 3) 

• Progress Energy Florida, Inc. (Combined License Application, Levy County Nuclear Power 

Plant, Units 1 and 2) 

• Detroit Edison Co. (Fermi Power Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation) 

• GE-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment LLC (GLE Commercial Facility) 

• Tennessee Valley Authority (Bellefonte Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2) 

• PPL Bell Bend, LLC (Combined License Application for Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant) 

• Southern Nuclear Operating Co. (Early Site Permit for Vogtle ESP Site) 

 The NRC Staff Requirements Memorandum providing more details on these affirmations 

will be available shortly at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/recent/2010/. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 10-003 January 7, 2010
----

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | · | the                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended                June 30,                2006, (the “Report”), which this certification accompanies, fully complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/                Thomas K. Grove               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  Thomas K. Grove                       |   |
|                  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|  /s/                Joanne Forsberg              |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  Joanne                Forsberg                       |   |
|  Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |   |

----