alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017161EN.01008201.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/82

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 289/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1078]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1342 of 22 April 2015 amending the methodology for the classification of products by activity given in Annex A to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1342 of 22 April 2015 amending the methodology for the classification of products by activity given in Annex A to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 19z (Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 R 1342: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1342 of 22 April 2015 (OJ L 207, 4.8.2015, p. 35).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 R 1342: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1342 of 22 April 2015 (OJ L 207, 4.8.2015, p. 35).’

Article 2

The texts of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1342 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 4.8.2015, p. 35.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
B.C.D. 01-39

APR 3 0 2001

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Minnesota Southern Railway, Inc. (MSRY)

This is a determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

the Minnesota Southern Railway, Inc. (MSRY) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seq.). MSRY has been preassigned B. A. No.

2655.

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket 33970, decided

December 8, 2000, MSRY filed a verified notice of exemption to lease and operate 

approximately 41.44 miles ofrail line owned and operated by Buffalo Ridge

Regional Rail Authority (BRRA) between milepost 0.0 at Agate, Minnesota, and

milepost 41.44, at Manley, Minnesota.1 MSRY entered into a lease and operating 

agreement with BRRR on November 27, 2000, acquiring its lease rights and

obligations in order to provide continuous rail service to shippers located along the

rail line.

Information regarding MSRY was furnished by Mr. Arnold T. Polanchek.

Mr. Polanchek reported that MSRY began operations on November 27, 2000 and

has one full time employee who was first compensated on January 1, 2001.

Mr. Polanchek stated that MSRY also “uses part-time seasonal employees as

needed.” According to Mr. Polanchek, MSRY “is a Class III carrier that provides 

rail transportation services to a predominantly agricultural area.” Mr. Polanchek 

reported that MSRY’s traffic consists primarily of com, soybeans, ethanol, and

DDG and its inbound traffic is primarily fertilizers. Mr. Polanchek further stated

that the projected annual volume offreight traffic is approximately 600 carloads.

MSRY interchanges with BNSF at Manley, Minnesota and the UPRR at

Worthington, Minnesota.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board under part A of subtitle IV of Title 49,

United States Code.

1 The Board’s Audit and Compliance Section is investigating the status of Buffalo Ridge Regional Rail Authority

(BRRA).

BA# 2655
-2-

Minnesota Southern Railway, Inc. (MSRY)

The evidence ofrecord establishes that MSRY is a rail carrier operating in

interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that the Minnesota Southern

Railway, Inc. (MSRY) became an employer within the meaning of section

l(a)(l)(i) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231(a)(l)(i)) and the

corresponding provision ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective

November 27, 2000, the date as of which it commenced operations.

CherryVT. Thomas Jr

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
### [§308e. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title VI, §631(b), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3299]

Section, added Pub. L. 96–342, title VIII, §805(a)(1), Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1093; amended Pub. L. 97–86, title V, §505, Dec. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 1109; Pub. L. 99–145, title VI, §645(a), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 654; Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VI, §626(b), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1104; Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VI, §613, Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1446; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §702(b)(1), (2), (c), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 117; Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title VI, §612(d), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2421; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title VI, §612(c), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1680; Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title VI, §611(c), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2782; Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title VI, §611(c), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 359; Pub. L. 104–201, div. A, title VI, §611(e), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2543; Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title VI, §§611(e), 623, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1785, 1793; Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title VI, §611(e), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2038; Pub. L. 106–65, div. A, title VI, §611(e), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 650; Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title VI, §621(e)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–151; Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title VI, §611(e), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1135; Pub. L. 107–296, title XVII, §1704(c), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2314; Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title VI, §611(d), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2567; Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VI, §611(d), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1500; Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title VI, §611(d), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1946, related to payment of bonus for reserve affiliation agreement.
NRC ACCEPTS FOR REVIEW ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ON PROPOSED 

LASER URANIUM ENRICHMENT PLANT IN NORTH CAROLINA 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has accepted for formal review an 

environmental report submitted by General Electric-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment LLC 

(GLE), as part of an application for a license to construct and operate a laser uranium enrichment 

plant near Wilmington, N.C. 

 GLE submitted the environmental report Jan. 30. The NRC staff has determined that the 

report is sufficiently complete to begin a formal technical review. 

 The report is one part of an application for a 40-year license to construct and operate a 

laser-based uranium enrichment facility at the existing General Electric/Global Nuclear FuelsAmericas site near Wilmington. The proposed facility would enrich uranium up to an assay level 

of 8 percent U-235, the isotope crucial for nuclear fission. The enriched uranium would be used 

in the production of fuel for commercial nuclear power reactors. 

 GLE has indicated it intends to file the rest of its application by the end of June. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-055 March 23, 2009
### §22712. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge or satisfactory provision for discharge of all liabilities shall be transferred to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to be applied to the care and comfort of disabled veterans of World War II, the Korean conflict, and the Vietnam era.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1309.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22712 | 36:67h. | July 23, 1947, ch. 298, §9, 61 Stat. 407; Aug. 15, 1977, Pub. L. 95–98, §1(b)(3), 91 Stat. 830; June 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–54, §13(n)(1), 105 Stat. 278. |

Section

The words "Secretary of Veterans Affairs" are substituted for "Department of Veterans Affairs" because under 38:303 the Secretary is the head of the Department.
No. II-09-040 July 20, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE TO MEET AT WATTS BAR 

NUCLEAR PLANT AND AT NRC REGION II OFFICE 

An advisory subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled two 

meetings in late July in Tennessee and in Atlanta. 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor 

Safeguards’ Plant Operations and Fire Protection Subcommittee has scheduled the first meeting 

for Tuesday, July 28, from 1-4:30 p.m. in the training center at the Watts Bar nuclear plant, 

located near Spring City, Tenn., between Knoxville and Chattanooga. During that meeting, the 

ACRS subcommittee members will hear presentations from Tennessee Valley Authority officials 

about TVA efforts to finish construction and seek an operating license for Watts Bar Unit 2. The 

meeting is open to the public and those attending will have an opportunity to provide comments. 

The subcommittee’s second meeting, also open to the public, is scheduled for Thursday, 

July 30, from 8 a.m. until 3 p.m. in the NRC’s Region II offices on the 24th floor of the Sam 

Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth St. SW in Atlanta. That meeting will allow NRC 

Region II staff to provide an overview of regional activities related to Watts Bar Unit 2 as well as 

other construction projects and operating plants. That meeting will also feature a period for 

public comments near the end. 

The ACRS is composed of experts representing many technical perspectives who provide 

independent advice to the Commission on reactor licensing and other regulatory matters. The 

meeting will provide information for the ACRS’s recommendations on the Watts Bar operating 

license. 

Media representatives and others planning to attend the meeting at the Watts Bar site are 

urged to email or call TVA’s Gail Franklin gfrankl@tva.gov or 423-365-2351 with full name and 

vehicle tag number to expedite processing through the plant’s security checkpoint. 

TVA submitted the original application for the two Watts Bar units in 1976. TVA 

finished Unit 1 and the NRC issued a license in 1996. TVA deferred completion of Unit 2 in the 

mid-1980s, but restarted construction with NRC oversight in 2007. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
For additional information, contact the NRC’s Maitri Banerjee at 301-415-6973 or 

maitri.banerjee@nrc.gov. ACRS meeting notices, transcripts and letters are available on the 

NRC’s web site at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



 



Exhibit 10(e)(ix)



FIRST AMENDMENT TO

SUPPLEMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     This FIRST AMENDMENT to the Supplement to the Employment Agreement by and
between Schering-Plough Corporation, a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”),
and Joseph C. Connors (the “Executive”), dated as of January 1, 2002 (the
“Supplement”), is dated as of the 16th day of December, 2003.


     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has
determined that it would be in the best interests of the Company and its
shareholders for the Executive to remain in the Company’s employment. Therefore,
the Compensation Committee has determined to offer to the Executive, and the
Executive has agreed, to enter into this First Amendment to the Supplement in
order to enhance the incentive for the Executive to remain in the employ of the
Company.


     NOW, THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:



	 	1.	 	Section 7(c) of the Supplement is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:
	 
	 	 	 	     Highest Annual Bonus: the higher of (i) the Executive’s highest
Annual Bonus for the last three full fiscal years prior to the Date of
Termination (annualized in the event that the Executive was not
employed by the Company for the whole of any such fiscal year) and (ii)
the Executive’s Annual Bonus for the fiscal year 2000.
	 
	 	2.	 	The Supplement is otherwise ratified and confirmed without amendment.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and, pursuant to the authorization from
the Compensation Committee of its Board of Directors, the Company, have caused
this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
/s/ Joseph C. Connors	 	 
	 	 	


	 	 	
Joseph C. Connors
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:
	 	/s/ C. Ron Cheeley
	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	[name] C. Ron Cheeley
	 	 	 	 	[title] SVP Global Human Resources
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: 

### Subject:
Hi Scott, Patricia Alexander <palexanderl@ymail.com> Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:53 PM Faulk, Scott (OST) mreeve@reevecorp.com reeve air to Tatitlek**,~ •~:**  . .-,n 

## 8 D i'l· 

## 2 ' l·:d
..

### :-.1

- ' IL" 

### I

My name is Patty Alexander and I am Doris Kompkoffs daughter. My mom is elderly and having to get supplies to her in the village ofTatitlek is essential. All of my dealings with Mike have been positive experiences. He is professional, dependable, and avery nice man. You can see he cares about people and their needs in Tatitlek. Iam always in need of sending my mom stuffand Iso appreciate Mike Reeves Air Services. Please allow him to continue, as he benefits the whole village with the service. Thank you, Patricia Alexander (Patty) 11707 Birch Knoll Loop Anchorage,Ak 99515 Phone#907-230-6754
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1970

To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn-1 (Bolt-1). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn-1 (Bolt-1).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOLTORN-1 (BOLT-1). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.04 Dendritic Polyester (CAS No. 

326794–48–3) 

(provided for in 

subheading 

3907.99.00) ....... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 
2

•HR 1970 IH 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Beaufort and Morehead Railway, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of Beaufort and Morehead Railway Inc. (BMRI)

as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et

sec.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§351 et sec.) (RUIA).

According to Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) Finance Docket

No. 31833, decided February 14, 1991, BMRI is the assignee of a

lease under which the Beaufort and East Coast Railroad, Inc. (BEC)

had operated the Beaufort & Morehead Railroad Company. According

to a letter dated November 4, 1993, from A.T. Leary, Jr., President

of BMRI, on February 4, 1991, BMRI purchased the assets of BEC and

commenced operations. Employees of BEC became employees of BMRI.

It appears more employees were hired February 1, 1993, and

compensated on February 8, 1993.

Based upon the information summarized above, it is determined that

Beaufort & Morehead Railway, Inc., as successor to BEC, became a

rail carrier employer under the RRA and RUIA effective

February 4, 1991, the date it began operations.

Glen L. Bower
### §154303. Powers

The corporation may—

(1) adopt and amend bylaws;

(2) adopt and alter a corporate seal;

(3) appoint or elect officers and agents;

(4) choose a board of trustees, consisting of at least 5 but not more than 15 individuals, to conduct the business and exercise the powers of the corporation;

(5) establish and maintain offices to conduct its activities;

(6) acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer property as necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the corporation;

(7) charge and collect membership dues and receive contributions of money or property to be devoted to carrying out the purposes of the corporation;

(8) sue and be sued; and

(9) do any other act necessary or appropriate to carry out the purposes of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1434.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154303 | 36:140b(b)–(j). | June 6, 1940, ch. 239, §3(b)–(j), 54 Stat. 233. |

Section

In clause (1), the words "not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States or of any State" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (2), the words "at pleasure" are omitted as unnecessary.

Clause (6) is substituted for "acquire, by purchase, devise, bequest, gift, or otherwise, and hold, encumber, convey, or otherwise dispose of such real and personal property as may be necessary or appropriate for its corporate purposes" for consistency in the revised title.

In clause (9), the word "generally" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "any other act" are substituted for "any and all lawful acts" for consistency in the revised title.
#### Helen Schwartz, Respondent, v. Julius Schwartz, Appellant.

It was an abuse of discretion for the court to recall and reverse its prior order in this matter. Order unanimously reversed, with leave to the plaintiff, if so advised, to make a new motion for the relief requested. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
Exhibit 34.3

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

HSBC Technology & Service (USA) Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying “Report on Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria Pursuant To Item 1122 of Regulation AB Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934” (Exhibit 33.3) that HSBC Technology & Services (USA) Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (Servicing Criteria)applicable to the servicing of asset backed securitization transactions backed by receivables generated by accounts originated under the HSBC Finance Corporation Union Plus® program, as described in Schedule I of Exhibit 33.3 (the Applicable Servicing Criteria ), as of and for the period from September 15, 2006 (date of issuance of the initial asset-backed securitization transaction covered by thisreport) through December 31, 2006.  Exhibit 33.3 identifies the individual asset-backed securitization transactions (the Covered Transactions) defined by management as part of their assessment. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Covered Transactions, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Covered Transactions, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.  Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by theCompany during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period September 15, 2006 through December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

March 5, 2007