alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017328EN.01014001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/140 |

---

DECISION No 54/2017 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 24 November 2017

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2017/2292]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington DC, 15 November 2017

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels, 24 November 2017

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | Emilab Srl | | Via F. lli Solari 5/A | | 33020 Amaro (UD) | | ITALY | |

---
§ 849.203 Information considered in determining whether to appoint a representative payee. In determining whether to appoint a representative payee, the agency will consider the following information: ( a ) *Evidence of legal guardianship or other court determinations.* Evidence of the appointment of a legal guardian or other person legally vested with the care of the individual or estate of an incompetent or a minor shall be a certified copy of the court's determination.
( b ) *Medical evidence.* The agency will use medical evidence to help determine whether an annuitant is capable of managing or directing the management of benefit payments. For example, a statement by a physician or other licensed health practitioner, based upon his or her recent examination of the annuitant and his or her knowledge of the annuitant's present condition, will be used in the agency's determination, if it includes information concerning the nature of the annuitant's illness or disability, the annuitant's chances for recovery, and the opinion of the physician or other licensed health practitioner as to whether the annuitant is able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments.
( c ) *Other evidence.* The agency may also require statements of relatives, friends, or other people in a position to know and observe the annuitant, which contain information helpful to the agency in deciding whether the annuitant is able to manage or direct the management of benefit payments.
### §20710. Service of process

The corporation shall comply with the law on service of process of each State in which it is incorporated and each State in which it carries on activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1290.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20710 | 36:1904. | June 1, 1982, Pub. L. 97–192, §4, 96 Stat. 109. |

Section

The words "in furtherance of its corporate purposes" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 838.804 Court orders must expressly award a former spouse survivor annuity or expressly direct an employee or retiree to elect to provide a former spouse survivor annuity. ( a ) A court order awarding a former spouse survivor annuity is not a court order acceptable for processing unless it expressly awards a former spouse survivor annuity or expressly directs an employee or retiree to elect to provide a former spouse survivor annuity as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) To expressly award a former spouse survivor annuity or expressly direct an employee or retiree to elect to provide a former spouse survivor annuity as required by paragraph (a) of this section the court order must— ( 1 ) Identify the retirement system using terms that are sufficient to identify the retirement system as explained in § 838.911; and
( 2 ) ( i ) Expressly state that the former spouse is entitled to a former spouse survivor annuity using terms that are sufficient to identify the survivor annuity as explained in § 838.912; or
( ii ) Expressly direct the retiree to elect to provide a former spouse survivor annuity using terms that are sufficient to identify the survivor annuity as explained in § 838.912.
### §220112. Service of process

(a) District of Columbia.—The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(b) States, Territories, and Possessions.—The corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of each State, territory, or possession of the United States in which the corporation or a council, organization, chapter, or affiliate may have activities, the name and address of an agent in that State, territory, or possession on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1462.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 220112(a) | 36:1309(b). | Dec. 29, 1979, Pub. L. 96–165, §9(b), (c), 93 Stat. 1271. |
| 220112(b) | 36:1309(c). | |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the secretary" for clarity and consistency in the revised title. The words "local, State, or regional", "post office", and "authorized" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "in that State, territory, or possession" are added (the 2d time they appear), and the words "legal process" are substituted for "local process", for clarity and consistency in the revised title.
### §60911. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) The term "designated person" means an immediate family member or someone similarly situated, as defined by the Attorney General.

(2) The term "immediate family member" means a parent, parent-in-law, grandparent, grandparent-in-law, sibling, spouse, child, or step-child of a murder victim.

(3) The term "victim" means a natural person who died as a result of a cold case murder.

(4) The term "murder" means any criminal offense under section 1111(a) of title 18 or any offense the elements of which are substantially identical to such section.

(5) The term "agency" means a Federal law enforcement entity with jurisdiction to engage in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of a cold case murder.

(6) The term "cold case murder" means a murder—

(A) committed more than three years prior to the date of an application by a designated person under section 60901(a) of this title;

(B) previously investigated by a Federal law enforcement entity;

(C) for which all probative investigative leads have been exhausted; and

(D) for which no likely perpetrator has been identified.

(Pub. L. 117–164, §12, Aug. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 1361.)
**EXHIBIT
      32**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), David A. Gestetner, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
      and
      Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial
      Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/
                David A. Gestetner
            
            President,
                Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the
                Board
            
            August
                3, 2006David
                A. Gestetner
            
            (Principal
                Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial
                and Accounting Officer)
### §901. Service flag and service lapel button

(a) Individuals Entitled To Display Service Flag.—A service flag approved by the Secretary of Defense may be displayed in a window of the place of residence of individuals who are members of the immediate family of an individual serving in the Armed Forces of the United States during any period of war or hostilities in which the Armed Forces of the United States are engaged.

(b) Individuals Entitled To Display Service Lapel Button.—A service lapel button approved by the Secretary may be worn by members of the immediate family of an individual serving in the Armed Forces of the United States during any period of war or hostilities in which the Armed Forces of the United States are engaged.

(c) License To Manufacture and Sell Service Flags and Service Lapel Buttons.—Any person may apply to the Secretary for a license to manufacture and sell the approved service flag, or the approved service lapel button, or both. Any person that manufactures a service flag or service lapel button without having first obtained a license, or otherwise violates this section is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $1,000.

(d) Regulations.—The Secretary may prescribe regulations necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1267.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 901(a) | 36:179. | Oct. 17, 1942, ch. 615, 56 Stat. 796; May 27, 1953, ch. 70, 67 Stat. 35. |
| 901(b) | 36:180. | |
| 901(c) | 36:181. | |
| 901(d) | 36:182. | |

Section

In subsection (c), the text of 36:181 (1st sentence) is omitted as executed. The word "Thereafter" is omitted as obsolete. The words "is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of" are substituted for "shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-149 August 12, 2008

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR 

MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Aug. 12 approved a request by Dominion 

Generation to increase the generating capacity of Unit 3 at the Millstone nuclear power 

plant by approximately 7 percent. The reactor is located about three miles southwest of 

New London, Conn. 

 The NRC staff determined that Dominion could safely increase the reactor’s 

output primarily by upgrading major plant components such as turbines and transformers. 

NRC staff also reviewed Dominion’s evaluations showing the plant’s design can handle 

the increased power level. 

The NRC's safety evaluation of the plant’s proposed power uprate focused on 

several areas, such as the nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control 

systems, electrical systems, accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations 

and training, testing, and technical specification changes. 

The power uprate will increase Millstone Unit 3’s generating capacity from 

approximately 1150 to 1230 megawatts electric. Dominion intends to implement the 

uprate during its fall 2008 outage. 

The NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the 

Federal Register providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. 

One request was submitted, but was rejected by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; 

an appeal of that decision is currently before the Commission. The agency’s evaluation of 

the Millstone Unit 3 uprate is available through the NRC’s ADAMS electronic document 

database by entering ML081640535 on this Web page: 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2326

To require the conveyance of certain Bureau of Land Management lands 

in Nye County, Nevada, to Ponderosa Dairy in Amargosa, Nevada. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2003

Mr. GIBBONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To require the conveyance of certain Bureau of Land Management lands in Nye County, Nevada, to Ponderosa 

Dairy in Amargosa, Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, PONDEROSA DAIRY, 

4 AMARGOSA, NEVADA. 

5 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the 

6 Interior shall convey to Ponderosa Dairy in Amargosa, 

7 Nevada, all right, title, and interest of the United States 

8 in and to a parcel of real property that is administered 

9 by the Bureau of Land Management in Nye County, Ne10 vada, consists of approximately 40 acres, and is more fully 
2

•HR 2326 IH 

described as the NE 1⁄4 , E 1⁄4 SE 1⁄4 , SW 1 1 ⁄4 of section 

2 15, township 17 south, range 49 east, Mount Diablo me3 ridian. 

4 (b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the con5 veyance under subsection (a), the recipient shall pay to 

6 the Secretary an amount equal to the fair market value 

7 of the conveyed lands. The fair market value of the lands 

8 shall be determined by an appraisal that is acceptable to 

9 the Secretary and conforms to the Federal appraisal 

10 standards, as defined in the Uniform Appraisal Standards 

11 for Federal Land Acquisitions developed by the Inter12 agency Land Acquisition Conference. 

13 (c) TIME FOR CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary shall 

14 complete the conveyance under subsection (a) not later 

15 than 120 days after the date on which the recipient depos16 its sufficient funds with the Bureau of Land Management 

17 to cover survey work and direct transaction costs described 

18 in subsection (d). 

19 (d) PAYMENT OF COSTS.—All direct transaction 

20 costs associated with the conveyance under subsection (a), 

21 including the costs of appraisal, title, and survey work, 

22 shall be paid by the recipient.

Æ
B.C.D. 02-34

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION MAY 1 0 2002

United Railway Supervisors Association

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board

regarding the continued status of the United Railway

Supervisors Association as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seq.) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et

seq.) (RUIA).

The Association was held to be a labor organization

employer under the Acts effective August 27, 1986, (B.A.

Number 8938). On December 30, 2000, the Association

merged into the United Transportation Union/Yardmasters

Division, also a labor organization employer under the

Acts (B.A. No. 8936) .

Accordingly, the Board holds that the Association ceased

to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement and

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective with the

date of the merger, December 30, 2000.

Cherr^ZL T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA# 8938
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-008 May 3, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE 

AT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with South Texas Project Nuclear

Operating Co. officials on May 10, to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the South Texas Project nuclear plant during 2005.

The 6 p.m. meeting at the Bay City Civic Center, 201 Seventh St., Bay City, Texas, is

open to public observation. Before the session ends, NRC staff will be available to answer

questions on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe plant

operation.

“Each year, the NRC assesses the performance of all of the nation’s commercial nuclear

power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “The meeting gives us an

opportunity to discuss our findings with the company, local officials and members of the public.

We look forward to meeting with members of the community and answering any questions they

may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2005 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/stp_2005q4.pdf .

Overall, South Texas Project operated safely during the period. The NRC uses colorcoded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear power plant performance.

The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate

with the safety significance of the issues involved. Because all of the inspection findings and

performance indicators for the plant during the last quarter of 2005 were determined to be
“green,” South Texas Project will receive a baseline (or routine) level of inspections during the

upcoming assessment period. 

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant operations to be inspected during the next year by NRC specialists are emergency

preparedness and radiological safety.

Current performance information for South Texas Project Unit 1 is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/STP1/stp1_chart.html . Current

performance information for South Texas Project Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/STP2/stp2_chart.html .

###
# L_2019254EN.01005601.xml

| 3.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/56

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 243/2017

of 15 December 2017

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1649]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1239 of 6 July 2017 on the recognition of Ethiopia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1239 of 6 July 2017 on the recognition of Ethiopia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 56jv (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1412) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘56jw. | 32017 D 1239: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1239 of 6 July 2017 on the recognition of Ethiopia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (OJ L 177, 8.7.2017, p. 43).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘56jw.

32017 D 1239: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1239 of 6 July 2017 on the recognition of Ethiopia pursuant to Directive 2008/106/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the systems for training and certification of seafarers (OJ L 177, 8.7.2017, p. 43).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1239 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 December 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 177, 8.7.2017, p. 43.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---