alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE AND MATERIALS 

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MD, MARCH 18-20 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and 

Materials (ACNWM) will meet March 18-20 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, a 

presentation by NRC staff to the Committee regarding resolution of burnup credit issues for 

licensing spent nuclear fuel transportations casks. In addition, the Committee will discuss 

proposed reports on matters considered during previous meetings. 

 

The ACNWM reports to and advises the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste and 

materials management. 

The meeting is open to the public; however, portions may be closed to protect 

information that is pre-decisional and are identified in the agenda. 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North 

building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. All sessions will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Anyone requiring the use of video teleconferencing to observe the meeting should contact 

Theron Brown at (301) 415-8066 to ensure availability. A complete agenda is available on the 

NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2008/ .

Individuals interested in making a statement or those seeking more information should contact 

Antonio Dias at (301) 415-6805. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-042 March 3, 2008
#### Kate Weissberger, Respondent, v. Harry Weissberger, Appellant.

Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
Reporti

Strategi

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

Joseph SearsManager, Chemistry Manager, Chemistry 

NRC-NEI Meeting NEI MeetingFebruary 24, 2010
Overview

• NEI reporting 

requirements

• EPIX

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

• Tie between EPIX and NEI 0

Tie between EPIX and NEI 0

• Questions
NEI 09-14 INPO support 14 INPO support

• Review plant Buried Piping Program

including piping that may not be safrelated but is important to plant safecontains potentially contains potentially radiologically radiologicallycontaminated fluids. 

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

• Communicate operating experience 

relative to buried piping issues and relevant information to the industry. 

• Assemble and report to NEI the 

information necessary to make perireports to NSIAC (Appendix A) on operating experience.
EPIX

• Equipment Performance 

Information Exchange Syste

• Component reliability data

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

p y
EPIX

• NEI 09-014 Appendix A 014 Appendix A• Basis for Underground Piping Le

EPIX Reporting Criteria 

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

• EPIX ready for reporting 2/28/20
EPIX Reporting Guidance

Utilities will enter operating experience related to 

below into INPO’s EPIX database when instance

Entries shall be made in a timeframe consistent wtiming requirements.

• Leaks from buried piping • Significant leaks from buried piping: defined as 

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

which meet either of the following criteria 

– Reportable under NRC, EPA, or state regulation o

Ground Water Protection Initiative, or 

– Result in the system or component being out of s

• Adverse inspection findings: defined as indicati

inspections that require a major repair within on
EPIX and NEI 09 EPIX and NEI 09-14 Appendix 

14 Appendix 

Each instance will be categorized into one o

following five areas depending upon the pipaffected. 

1. Piping contains radioactive material 2. Safety related piping 3 Pi i t i i t ll iti 

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 

. Piping contains environmentally sensitiv

(e.g., oils, chemicals, non (e.g., oils, chemicals, non-radioactive flu

radioactive flu

4. Other piping that is in the buried piping 

(excludes piping categorized as “run to under utility programs) 

5. Leaks from piping categorized as “run to 
Questions 

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
exv10w2x6yxcy



 



Exhibit 10.2(6)(c)


THIRD AMENDMENT TO

BELO

2000 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN



     Belo Corp., a Delaware corporation, pursuant to authorization of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, adopts the following
amendments to the Belo 2000 Executive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), effective
as of December 4, 2003.


     1.     Paragraph 2(d) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as
follows:



		
	 	     (d) “Change in Control” means the first to occur of the events
described in (i) through (iv) below, unless the Board has adopted a
resolution prior to or promptly following the occurrence of any such
event stipulating, conditionally, temporarily or otherwise, that any such
event will not result in a change in control of Belo for purposes of the
Plan:




		
	 	     (i) the commencement of, or first public announcement of the
intention of any entity, person or group (within the meaning of
Section 3(b) of, and Rule 13d-5(b) promulgated under, the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, respectively) to
commence, a tender offer or exchange offer (other than an offer by
Belo or any Subsidiary) for all, or any part of, the Common Stock;




		
	 	     (ii) the public announcement by Belo or by any group (as
defined in clause (i) above), entity or person (other than Belo,
any Subsidiary, or any savings, pension or other benefit plan for
the benefit of employees of Belo or any Subsidiary) which, through
a transaction or series of transactions has acquired, directly or
indirectly, beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
of more than 30% of the total number of shares of Common Stock,
that such group, entity or person has become such a beneficial
owner;




		
	 	     (iii) the approval by Belo’s shareholders (or, if such
approval is not required, the consummation) of a merger in which
Belo does not survive as an independent publicly owned corporation,
a consolidation, or a sale, exchange, or other disposition of all
or substantially all of Belo’s assets; or




		
	 	     (iv) a change in the composition of the Board during any
period of two consecutive years such that individuals who at the
beginning of such period were members of the Board cease for any
reason to constitute at least a majority thereof, unless the
election, or the nomination for election by Belo’s shareholders, of
each new director was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of
the directors then still in office who were directors at the
beginning of such period



 






 






     2.     The Plan is amended by the addition of the following new Paragraph:



		
	 	     17. Term. The Plan was approved by the shareholders of Belo on May
10, 2000, and will expire on the tenth anniversary of such shareholder
approval. No further Awards will be made under the Plan on or after May
10, 2010.



     Executed this 5th day of December, 2003.



	 	 	 
	 	
BELO CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By	
 /s/Marian Spitzberg
	 	 	



	 	 	
Marian Spitzberg
	 	 	
Senior Vice President/Human Resources




2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Kenneth Shenkman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of W-candy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of W-Candy, Inc

   June 20, 2006

                By:/s/ Kenneth Shenkman
                Kenneth Shenkman, CFO and Chief and Principal Accounting Officer
### §501. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) "Inaugural Committee" means the committee appointed by the President-elect to be in charge of the Presidential inaugural ceremony and functions and activities connected with the ceremony; and

(2) "inaugural period" means the period that includes the day on which the Presidential inaugural ceremony is held, the 5 calendar days immediately preceding that day, and the 4 calendar days immediately following that day.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1263.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 501 | 36:721(b). | Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 974, §1(b), 70 Stat. 1049. |
| | 36:730. | Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 974, §10, as added Jan. 30, 1968, Pub. L. 90–251, §4, 82 Stat. 4. |

Section

In this chapter, the word "Mayor" is substituted for "Commissioners" in the Presidential Inaugural Ceremonies Act (ch. 974, 70 Stat. 1049) [subsequently changed to "Commissioner" in 36:ch. 30 because section 401 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1967 (5 App. U.S.C.) transferred the functions of the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia to the Commissioner of the District of Columbia and because of 36:730] because of sections 421 and 711 of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act (Public Law 93–198, 87 Stat. 789, 818), which abolished the office of Commissioner of the District of Columbia and replaced it with the office of Mayor of the District of Columbia.

In this section, the text of 36:721(b)(3)–(5) is omitted because the complete names of the Mayor of the District of Columbia and the Secretaries of Defense and of the Interior are used the first time the terms appear in a section.
No. II-09-010 March 2, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS 

SAFETY CULTURE AT NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a public meeting in Atlanta with 

officials of Nuclear Fuel Services on Wednesday, March 18 to discuss a plan to improve safety 

at the company’s facility in Erwin, Tenn. 

The meeting will begin at 1 p.m. (EST) at the NRC Region II office, located in the Sam 

Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth St., S.W., Suite 24T20. The meeting will be open to 

observation by the public, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer 

questions from interested observers.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the status of the NFS Comprehensive Safety 

Culture Initiative. “Safety culture” refers to an organization’s overall commitment to health and 

safety management. NFS agreed in 2007 to launch the program, designed to improve safety at 

the facility following a series of violations. 

 Those interested in participating in this meeting by toll-free audio teleconference should 

contact Manuel Crespo at 404-562-4733 or via email at manuel.crespo@nrc.gov by March 16. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 53455-0-II

Respondent,

v.

DAVID ACE MIKEALS, UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appellant.

LEE, C.J. — David A. Mikeals was convicted of residential burglary, possession of a 

controlled substance, and bail jumping. Mikeals appeals only his conviction for possession of a 

controlled substance, arguing that the statute criminalizing simple possession is unconstitutional. 

Based on our Supreme Court’s decision in State v. Blake,

1 we agree. Therefore, we reverse 

Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance and remand to the trial court to vacate 

that conviction and to resentence Mikeals on his remaining convictions.2

 

1

 State v. Blake, 197 Wn.2d 170, 481 P.3d 521 (2021). 

2

 Mikeals also filed a motion to remand for resentencing. Motion to Remand for Resentencing in 

Light of Blake, No. 53455-0-II, March 17, 2021. The State agrees that this case should be 

remanded for resentencing. Because we reverse Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled 

substance, resentencing is necessarily required. Therefore, we also grant Mikeals’ motion for 

resentencing.

In addition, Mikeals filed a motion for accelerated review that is pending before this court. Motion 

to Accelerate Review, No. 53455-0-II, April 6, 2021. Because we have now decided Mikeals’

appeal, the motion for accelerated review is now moot. 

Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

June 15, 2021
No. 53455-0-II

2

FACTS

Following a jury trial, Mikeals was convicted of residential burglary, possession of a 

controlled substance, and bail jumping. Mikeals appeals his conviction for possession of a 

controlled substance. 

ANALYSIS

Mikeals argues that his conviction for possession of a controlled substance is 

unconstitutional. We agree.

In Blake, our Supreme Court held that RCW 69.50.4013(1), the statute criminalizing 

simple possession, is unconstitutional. 197 Wn.2d at 186. Therefore, the statute is void. Id. at

195. Because RCW 69.50.4013(1) is void, Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled 

substance is invalid. See In re Pers. Restraint of Hinton, 152 Wn.2d 853, 857-58, 100 P.3d 801 

(2004). 

We reverse Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance. We remand to 

the trial court to vacate Mikeals’ conviction for possession of a controlled substance and to 

resentence Mikeals on his remaining convictions. 
No. 53455-0-II

3

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the 

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, 

it is so ordered.

Lee, C.J.

We concur:

Worswick, J.

Glasgow, J.
### §3048. Continuation on active duty; deferral of retirement

The provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 36 of title 10 relating to continuation on active duty and deferral of retirement shall apply to commissioned officers of the Administration.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §248, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3090.)
# L_2019082EN.01000101.xml

| 25.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 82/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 82/1

---

Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People's Republic of China in connection with DS492 European Union — Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People's Republic of China in connection with DS492 European Union — Measures affecting Tariff Concessions on Certain Poultry Meat Products (1), signed in Geneva on 30 November 2018, will enter into force on 1 April 2019.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 27, 31.1.2019, p. 4.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 18, 2018

No. 04-18-00351-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.G.M.R., a Child

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-01101

Honorable Richard Garcia, Associate Judge Presiding

ORDER

This appeal is DISMISSED. Because appellant is indigent, no costs of this appeal are 

assessed. 

It is so ORDERED on July 18, 2018.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of July, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Adira
Energy Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and               
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: April 30, 2014 | /s/
      Gadi Levin         
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | Gadi Levin                   
|                     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     | (principal executive officer)

---
SUBSIDIARIES OF AVOCENT CORPORATION  as of December 31, 2000

|1.  |  | Cybex Computer Products Corporation, an Alabama corporation         
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.  |  | Avocent Services Corporation, a Texas corporation                   
|3.  |  | Avocent International, Ltd., an Ireland corporation                 
|4.  |  | Cybex International Corporation, a Barbados corporation             
|5.  |  | Avocent Computertechnik GmbH, a Germany corporation                 
|6.  |  | Avocent GmbH & Co. KG, a Germany corporation                        
|7.  |  | Avocent GmbH Data Systems, a Germany corporation                    
|8.  |  | Apex Incorporated, a Washington corporation                         
|9.  |  | Apex International, Inc., a Washington corporation                  
|10. |  | Apex PC Solutions, Ltd., a Barbados corporation                     
|11. |  | Apex.com Incorporated, a Washington corporation                     
|12. |  | Apex Solutions Texas, L.P., a Texas limited partnership             
|13. |  | Apex Solutions Texas I, LLC, a Washington limited liability company 
|14. |  | Apex Solutions Texas II, LLC, a Washington limited liability company

---

QuickLinks
# L_2017191EN.01001101.xml

| 22.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 191/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 191/11

---

DECISION No 1/2017 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONAL CONVENTION ON PAN-EURO-MEDITERRANEAN PREFERENTIAL RULES OF ORIGIN

of 16 May 2017

as regards the request of Ukraine to become a Contracting Party to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin [2017/1367]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 5(1) of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (‘the Convention’) provides that a third party may become a Contracting Party to the Convention provided that the candidate country or territory has a free trade agreement in force, providing for preferential rules of origin, with at least one of the Contracting Parties. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 5(1) of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin (‘the Convention’) provides that a third party may become a Contracting Party to the Convention provided that the candidate country or territory has a free trade agreement in force, providing for preferential rules of origin, with at least one of the Contracting Parties.

| (2) | Ukraine submitted a written request for accession to the Convention on 12 September 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Ukraine submitted a written request for accession to the Convention on 12 September 2016.

| (3) | Ukraine has a free trade agreement in force with several Contracting Parties to the Convention and therefore complies with the condition set out in Article 5(1) of the Convention to become a Contracting Party. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Ukraine has a free trade agreement in force with several Contracting Parties to the Convention and therefore complies with the condition set out in Article 5(1) of the Convention to become a Contracting Party.

| (4) | Article 4(3)(b) of the Convention provides that the Joint Committee is to adopt by decision invitations to third parties to accede to the Convention, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Article 4(3)(b) of the Convention provides that the Joint Committee is to adopt by decision invitations to third parties to accede to the Convention,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ukraine shall be invited to accede to the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2017.

For the Joint Committee

The Chair

Péter KOVÀCS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 54, 26.2.2013, p. 4.

1

---
#### § 630.404 Requesting sick leave.

An employee must file an application—written, oral, or electronic, as required by the agency—for sick leave within such time limits as the agency may require. The employee must request advance approval for sick leave for the purpose of receiving medical, dental, or optical examination or treatment and, to the extent possible, for the purposes described in § 630.401(a)(3), (4), and (6).

[71 FR 47695, Aug. 17, 2006. Redesignated at 75 FR 75373, Dec. 3, 2010]
§ 831.1762 Death of an individual who has separated from phased employment and who dies before submitting an application for a composite retirement annuity. ( a ) For the purpose of 5 U.S.C. 8341, an individual who dies after separating from phased employment and before submitting an application for composite retirement annuity is deemed to have filed an application for full retirement status, and composite retirement annuity, with OPM.
( b ) Unless an individual described in paragraph (a) of this section was reemployed with the Federal Government after separating from phased employment, the composite retirement annuity of an individual described in paragraph (a) of this section is deemed to have accrued from the day after separation through the date of death. Any composite annuity accrued during such period of time, minus any phased annuity paid during that period, will be paid as a lump-sum payment of accrued and unpaid annuity, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8342(c) and (f).