alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit No. 10(V)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                           THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
                      2003 DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

         The Progressive Corporation 2003 Directors Equity Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       The following is hereby added as Paragraph (13) of SECTION 5,
                  thereof:

                  (13) Any Participant who is then eligible to participate in
                  The Progressive Corporation Directors Restricted Stock
                  Deferral Plan, or any other deferral plan hereafter adopted or
                  maintained by the Company for the benefit of Eligible
                  Directors which allows for the deferral of Restricted Stock
                  Awards, (a "Deferral Plan"), may elect to defer all or any
                  portion of any Restricted Stock Award granted to him or her
                  under this Plan, subject to and in accordance with the terms
                  of the applicable Deferral Plan.

         This Amendment will be effective as of February 1, 2004.

                                          /s/ Charles E. Jarrett
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Charles E. Jarrett
                                          Secretary
# L_2020026EN.01003001.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 50/2018

of 23 March 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/67]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1443 of 29 June 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain drug precursors in the list of scheduled substances (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1443 of 29 June 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain drug precursors in the list of scheduled substances (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 15x (Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 1443: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1443 of 29 June 2016 (OJ L 235, 1.9.2016, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 1443: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1443 of 29 June 2016 (OJ L 235, 1.9.2016, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1443 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 March 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 235, 1.9.2016, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §20921. National Sex Offender Registry

#### (a) Internet

The Attorney General shall maintain a national database at the Federal Bureau of Investigation for each sex offender and any other person required to register in a jurisdiction's sex offender registry. The database shall be known as the National Sex Offender Registry.

#### (b) Electronic forwarding

The Attorney General shall ensure (through the National Sex Offender Registry or otherwise) that updated information about a sex offender is immediately transmitted by electronic forwarding to all relevant jurisdictions.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title I, §119, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 596.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16919 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 3, 2019

b0702

Order 

Clerk

July 3, 2019

159645

In re P. B. CAMPBELL, Minor. SC: 159645

COA: 344885

Wayne CC Family Div: 

16-523689-NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID CARLETTI AND BRENDA 

CARLETTI, H/W,

Petitioners

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 576 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. IV-10-008

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519

 

March 19, 2010

E-Mail: OPA4.Resource@nrc.gov

 

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Entergy Operations, Inc. 

staff on March 31, to discuss the results of an independent safety culture survey conducted by 

the company at several of its nuclear plants.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 8 a.m. in the NRC’s 

Region IV office, 612 E. Lamar Blvd, Arlington, Texas.

Entergy officials will present a briefing on survey results at Arkansas Nuclear One, in 

Ark.; Grand Gulf in Miss.; and the River Bend and Waterford nuclear plants in La.

Observers will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting 

is adjourned. Members of the public can listen to the meeting by calling 1-800-952-9677, and 

requesting to be connected to a phone bridge.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
472 P.2d 383

#### STATE of New Mexico, Respondent, v. Jerry SEGURA, Petitioner.

No. 9080.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 2, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 453, 81 N.M. 673, 472 P.2d 387, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
### §30306. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation and its authorized regional groups and other local subdivisions have the exclusive right to use the name "Blinded Veterans Association" and seals, emblems, and badges the corporation adopts.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1318.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30306 | 36:867. | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §17, 72 Stat. 927. |

Section

The word "sole" is omitted as included in "exclusive", and the word "have" (the 2d time appearing) is omitted as included in "use". The words "duly", "in carrying out its purposes", and "lawfully" are omitted as unnecessary.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1507 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1507

To waive the time limitation specified by law for the award of certain 
 military decorations in order to allow the award of the Congressional 
  Medal of Honor to Steve Piniaha of Sparta, New Jersey, for acts of 
         valor while a member of the Army during World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2003

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive the time limitation specified by law for the award of certain 
 military decorations in order to allow the award of the Congressional 
  Medal of Honor to Steve Piniaha of Sparta, New Jersey, for acts of 
         valor while a member of the Army during World War II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
the time limitations specified in section 3744(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, the President is authorized and requested to award the 
Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to Steve Piniaha of 
Sparta, New Jersey, for acts of valor on April 25, 1945, during World 
War II while a private first class in the United States Army.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

**STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending **April 30, 2006**as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Michael Rezac**, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  June 13  2006 |  
 
/s/  Michael Rezac

 
 
Michael Rezac, Chief Financial Officer

 

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 17, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00598

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CARLOS Y. BENAVIDES, JR., AN INCAPACITATED PERSON,

From the County Court At Law No 1

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PB6

– 000081

- L2 Honorable Hugo Martinez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After this court granted Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief, we set Appellant’s brief due on May 12, 2021. On the extended due date, Appellant filed a second motion for extension of time to file the brief until June 11, 2021. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on June 11, 2021. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of May, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# L_2017161EN.01000301.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/3

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 234/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1023]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2014/704/EU of 8 October 2014 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the list of border inspection posts (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2014/704/EU of 8 October 2014 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the list of border inspection posts (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein.

| (3) | Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 39 (Commission Decision 2009/821/EC) in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 D 0704: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/704/EU of 8 October 2014 (OJ L 294, 10.10.2014, p. 46).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 D 0704: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/704/EU of 8 October 2014 (OJ L 294, 10.10.2014, p. 46).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision 2014/704/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 294, 10.10.2014, p. 46.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except

under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court’s General Order filed November 29, 1993. 151 F.R.D. 470. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 11/2/95 TENTH CIRCUIT PETER PAUL MARTINEZ,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 95-1167

v. (D.C. No. 94-M-1775) ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS and GALE NORTON, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, (District of Colorado)

Respondents - Appellees.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

The parties have agreed that this case may be submitted for decision on the briefs. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.2. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.2

We AFFIRM for the reasons provided by the district court. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
§ 838.932 Court orders that permit the former spouse to elect to receive a former spouse survivor annuity. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a court order that gives the former spouse the right to elect a former spouse survivor annuity satisfies the requirements of § 838.804(b)(2) and provides a former spouse survivor annuity in the amount otherwise provided by the court order.
( b ) A former spouse who has been awarded a former spouse survivor annuity by a court order that gives the former spouse the right to elect a former spouse survivor annuity may irrevocably elect not to be eligible for a former spouse survivor annuity based on the court order.
( c ) The former spouse may make the election under paragraph (b) of this section at any time after the issuance of the court order. An election under paragraph (b) of this section— ( 1 ) Must be in writing and in the form prescribed by OPM;
( 2 ) Is effective on the first day of the month following the month in which OPM received the election; and
( 3 ) Is irrevocable once it has become effective.
( d ) The reduction in an employee annuity based on a court order that gives the former spouse the right to elect a former spouse survivor annuity terminates on the last day of the month in which OPM receives the former spouse's election under paragraph (b) of this section.
[57 FR 33574, July 29, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 43493, Aug. 17, 1993]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-231 December 22, 2008

NRC CLARIFIES ACCEPTABLE PROCESS FOR EVALUATING 

HEAVY LOAD LIFTS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has notified U.S. nuclear power plants of the 

agency’s position on analyzing crane operations involving very large loads, such as reactor 

vessel heads. 

The NRC’s Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2008-28 explains the staff’s evaluation of 

heavy-load guidelines the nuclear industry developed in 2008. The evaluation includes 

clarifications and conditions the staff finds necessary for appropriately implementing the 

industry guidance. 

Nuclear power plant operators must regularly use cranes to lift and maneuver objects 

weighing dozens of tons in the course of reactor maintenance and spent fuel management. The 

nuclear industry established the guidelines to provide a more consistent approach for safe 

handling of heavy loads at nuclear power plants. 

 The RIS is available through the NRC’s electronic documents database, ADAMS, by 

entering ML082460291 in the ADAMS search engine at: 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### W. Russell Root, Stockholder in The Pulitzer Magazine Company, Inc., on Behalf of Himself, etc., Appellant, v. Walter Pulitzer and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
# L_2017131EN.01001001.xml

| 20.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 131/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 131/10

---

Information on the entry into force of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands

The European Union and the Cook Islands signed, on 3 May 2016, in Brussels, and respectively on 14 October 2016, in Avarua, a Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement and the Implementation Protocol thereto.

The European Union notified on 28 February 2017 that it had completed the internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Agreement. The Cook Islands notified on 10 May 2017.

The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 10 May 2017 pursuant to Article 17 thereof.

---
#### In the Matter of Thomas R. Kearney, Appellant, against Frank C. Moore, as New York State Comptroller, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffeman, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 728.]
### §10591. Grants authorized

The Attorney General may make grants to States, units of local government, territories, nonprofit organizations, and Indian Tribes to—

(1) develop, implement, and expand comprehensive and clinically-appropriate family-based substance abuse treatment programs as alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent parent drug offenders; and

(2) to 1 provide prison-based family treatment programs for incarcerated parents of minor children or pregnant women.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2921, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §113, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 674; amended Pub. L. 114–198, title II, §201(c)(1), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §502(b)(1), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5228.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797s of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2018—Par. (1). Pub. L. 115–391 inserted "nonprofit organizations," before "and Indian" in introductory provisions.

2016—Par. (2). Pub. L. 114–198 inserted before period at end "or pregnant women".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Construction of 2008 Amendment

For construction of amendments by Pub. L. 110–199 and requirements for grants made under such amendments, see section 60504 of this title.

1 So in original. The word "to" probably should not appear.
### §535c. Approval of Secretary; commencement and completion requirements; extension of time limits

The approval of the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, as required by section 491 of this title, shall be given only subsequent to the President's approval, as provided for in section 535b of this title, and shall be null and void unless the construction of the bridge is commenced within two years and completed within five years from the date of the Secretary's approval: Provided, however, That the Secretary, for good cause shown, may extend for a reasonable time either or both of the time limits herein provided.

(Pub. L. 92–434, §5, Sept. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 732; Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §306(b)(6)(A), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 56.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–120 substituted "Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating" for "Secretary of Transportation".