alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.aa

                           SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE
               HUFFY CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL/EXCESS BENEFIT PLAN

         WHEREAS, Huffy Corporation (the "Sponsor") maintains the Huffy
Corporation Supplemental/Excess Benefit Plan (the "Plan") effective June 1,
1988; and

         WHEREAS, the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Sponsor adopts the following amendment to the Plan
effective as of January 1, 2004:

I.       Section 5.3 shall be added to the Plan to read as follows:

                           5.3      Limitation on Payments. Notwithstanding
                  anything to the contrary set forth in the Plan, in the event
                  that, at the time a Participant's Vested Benefit hereunder
                  becomes payable, the Board of Directors of the Sponsor (the
                  "Board") determines that the Sponsor has not accumulated with
                  respect to such Participant assets equal to the entire amount
                  of such Participant's Supplemental/Excess Benefit which is
                  then payable, then the Sponsor shall pay to the Participant
                  the largest amount of such currently payable
                  Supplemental/Excess Benefit which the Board in its discretion
                  determines may be paid from the assets which the Sponsor has
                  accumulated for that purpose. The remaining portion of the
                  Participant's Supplemental/Excess Benefit which has become
                  payable shall be paid over the succeeding 24 months. Payment
                  of such remaining portion (and accrued interest, as described
                  below) shall be made, as determined by the Board in its
                  discretion, in monthly installments, quarterly installments, a
                  lump sum, or a combination of such methods. Interest shall
                  accrue on any unpaid portion of the Participant's
                  Supplemental/Excess Benefit at a rate equal to the rate
                  currently payable on 10 year debt instruments issued by the
                  United States Treasury as of the date on which the
                  Participant's Supplemental/Excess Benefit originally becomes
                  payable.

II.      In all other respects, the Plan shall remain unchanged.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has caused this instrument to be
executed as of the 10th day of February, 2004.

                                                 HUFFY CORPORATION

                                                 By: /s/ Nancy A. Michaud
                                                     ---------------------------

                                                 Title:   Secretary
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Paul Minichiello, C.F.O., Treasurer and Director of Manchester Inc., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Manchester Inc.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact

or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances

under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this

quarterly report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this

quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and

cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the

registrant and have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to

the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those

entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of August 31,

2005 (the Evaluation Date);



c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls

and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to

the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons

performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely the

registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the

registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a

significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there

were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal

controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with

regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  October 14, 2005                                                 /s/ Paul Minichiello

---------------------------------------------------------

Paul Minichiello, Treasurer and Director

Principal Financial Officer
§ 831.1604 Conditions for coverage in secondary positions. ( a ) An employee's service in a position that has been determined by the employing agency head to be a secondary position is covered under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336(c) if all of the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) The employee is transferred directly (i.e., without a break in service exceeding 3 days) from a primary position to a secondary position; and
( 2 ) The employee has completed 3 years of service in a primary position, including a position for which no CSRS deductions were withheld; and
( 3 ) If applicable, the employee has been continuously employed in secondary positions since transferring from a primary position without a break in service exceeding 3 days, except that a break in employment in secondary positions which begins with an involuntary separation (not for cause), within the meaning of 8336(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is not considered in determining whether the service in secondary positions is continuous for this purpose.
( b ) For the purpose of applying the criteria at paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section to evaluate transfers, service, and employment periods that occurred before September 1, 2007— ( 1 ) A primary position is deemed to include: ( i ) A position whose duties included the performance of work directly connected with activities relating to the arrival and departure of persons, conveyances, and merchandise at ports of entry that was classified within the Immigration Inspector Series (GS-1816), Customs Inspector Series (GS-1890), Canine Enforcement Officer Series (GS-1801), or any other series which the agency head determines were predecessor series to the Customs and Border Protection Series (GS-1895), and that would have been classified under the GS-1895 series had it then existed; and
( ii ) A position within the Customs and Border Protection Series (GS-1895) whose duties included the performance of work directly connected with activities relating to the arrival and departure of persons, conveyances, and merchandise at ports of entry.
( 2 ) A secondary position is deemed to include: ( i ) A first-level supervisor of an employee in a position described at paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii) of this section; or
( ii ) An executive, managerial, technical, semiprofessional, or professional position for which experience in a position described at paragraph (b)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(ii) of this section is a mandatory prerequisite.
( c ) An employee who is not in a primary position, nor covered while in a secondary position, and who is detailed or temporarily promoted to a secondary position is not covered under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336(c) for any purpose under this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 21, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et. seq. (``the Act''), Society of Automotive 
Engineers, Inc., (``SAE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Society of 
Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA. The nature and scope of 
SAE's standards development activities are: The development of 
consensus standards for self-propelled vehicles including aerospace 
vehicles, aircraft, automobiles, trucks and buses, off-highway 
equipment vehicles, marine, rail and transit systems.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25077 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

P ETER MANUEL CANDELARIA

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00 009

- C R

Appeal from the

118 th District Court

o f Howard County, Texas

(TC# 15558 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until May 12 , 20 20

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Rick Dunbar , the Appellant’s attorney, prepare the

Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Cour t on or before May 12 , 20 20

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 4 th day of April , 20 20

.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October
2, 2009





/s/
      B.J. SparksB.J.
      SparksChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Kathleen B. O’Brien, Appellant, v. Philip G. O’Brien, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
1

From:

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:57 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Aloha,

I am writing to express my extreme concern and dismay for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel

leaking from Navy storage tanks in Red Hill. When will you protect this precious resource?

Please ensure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty‐five years is way too long to wait before acting

to save our most precious resource. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, then the tanks must be emptied. This is

criminal since the aquifer supplies water for the citizens and farmlands of Oahu.

I also ask that the public comment period on the negotiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity to

understand and weigh‐in on this important issue.  

Please continue to keep me informed in this decision‐making process.  

Thank you.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-125 October 5, 2004

NRC CHAIRMAN DISCUSSES NUCLEAR PLANT SECURITY

AT AMERICAS NUCLEAR ENERGY SYMPOSIUM

MIAMI - Security at U.S. nuclear power plants has been substantially upgraded since Sept. 11,

2001, with higher federal requirements placed on utilities that operate nuclear facilities, Nuclear

Regulatory Commission Chairman Nils J. Diaz said Tuesday.

"Nuclear power plants have been and are even more so now among the most well-protected

elements of our national civilian infrastructure," Diaz said in remarks prepared for delivery at the

Americas Nuclear Energy Symposium jointly sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and the

American Nuclear Society. 

"The NRC has further strengthened security requirements at nuclear power plants and enhanced

our coordination with federal, state and local organizations since Sept. 11," Diaz said. "In addition, the

NRC has conducted research-based studies which concluded that a significant radiological release

affecting public health and safety is unlikely from a terrorist attack, including a large commercial

aircraft. And time is available to protect the public in the unlikely event of a radiation release."

Diaz also said the NRC is:

- improving nuclear plant operating safety in the United States through the use of a new Reactor

Oversight Program that provides a better inspection regime for plants. He said the NRC

objective is to “provide the tools for inspecting and assessing licensee performance in a manner

that was more risk-informed, objective, predictable and understandable than the previous

oversight processes, and that ensures the agency’s performance goals are being met.”

- providing oversight in a way that corresponds to the actual, real world risk presented, rather

than a theoretical worst-case scenario. He added, “Simply put, technical and regulatory

decisions are informed by the real world – utilizing advancing scientific knowledge, improving

technological capabilities and the lessons that have been learned through decades of operating

experience.”

Outlining security advances, Diaz said that the steps taken by the NRC include: ordering plants

to take into account a more challenging adversarial threat; tighter access controls and vehicle checks at

greater stand-off distances; significantly improved force-on-force exercises to test the capabilities of

plant defenders; better readiness by plant security forces; and enhanced liaison with the intelligence
-2-

community, and federal, state and local authorities responsible for protecting the national critical

infrastructure through integrated response training.

The symposium brought together members of the government, industry, and academic

communities for presentations and discussions on issues related to the future of nuclear energy in the

Americas. 

###
#### Harold E. Ingram et al., v. Harris S. Bigelow et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 667.]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128245 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128245 

 COA: 258216 

Saginaw CC: 02-021833-FC 

RUSSELL JAMISON RICHARDS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 16, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
§ 839.1204 On what basis will OPM review claims under this subpart? ( a ) OPM will base its decision on only the written record, including all of your submissions and other documentation in OPM's possession.
( b ) At OPM's discretion, OPM may request your employer to provide an administrative report. The report may include: ( 1 ) A description of the retirement coverage error;
( 2 ) A statement as to whether a settlement or other court-ordered award was made;
( 3 ) The employer's recommendation for resolution of the claim; and
( 4 ) Any other information your employer believes OPM should consider.
( c ) The burden of proof that the criteria for approving a reimbursement of expenses is on you.
### §10594. Applications

#### (a) In general

An entity described in section 10591 of this title desiring a grant under this subchapter shall submit to the Attorney General an application in such form and manner and at such time as the Attorney General requires.

#### (b) Contents

An application under subsection (a) shall include a description of the methods and measurements the applicant will use for purposes of evaluating the program involved.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2924, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §113, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797s–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Construction of 2008 Amendment

For construction of amendments by Pub. L. 110–199 and requirements for grants made under such amendments, see section 60504 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

                    The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces the appointment of members of the AHRQ Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB). This action is being taken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., 4314(c)(4) of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, which requires members of the performance review boards to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

The function of the PRB is to ensure consistency, stability and objectivity in SES performance appraisals, and to make recommendations to the Director, AHRQ, relating to the performance of senior executives in the Agency.

The following persons will serve on the AHRQ SES Performance Review Board:

Bill Beldon

Helen Burstin

Francis Chesley

Steven Cohen

J. Michael Fitzmaurice

Irene Fraser

Robert Graham

Kathleen Kendrick

Anna Marsh

Robert McSwain

Jean Slutsky

Christine Williams

Phyllis Zucker

For further information about the AHRQ Performance Review Board, contact Jeffrey Toven, Office of Performance, Accountability, Resources, and Technology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 4329, Rockville, Maryland 20850.

Dated: November 4, 2004.

Carolyn M. Clancy, 

Director, AHRQ.

[FR Doc. 04-24998  Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-90-M