alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65245-65246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25049]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 2, 2004.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the

[[Page 65246]]

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 10, 
2004 to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0044.
    Form Number: TTB F 5110.34.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Notice of Change in Status of Plant.
    Description: TTB F 5110.34 is necessary to show the use of the 
distilled spirits plan (DSP) premises for other activities or by 
alternating proprietors. It describes proprietor's use of plant 
premises and other information show that the change in plant status is 
in community with law and regulations. It also shows what bond covers 
the activities of the DSP at a given time.
    Respondents: Business of other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 100.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,000 hours.
    OMB Number: 1513-0050.
    Form Number: TTB F 5110.50.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Tax Deferral Bond--Distilled Spirits (Puerto Rico).
    Description: TTB Form 5110.50 is the bond to secure payment of 
excise taxes on distilled spirits shipped from Puerto Rico to the U.S. 
on deferral of the tax. The form identifies the principal, the surety, 
purpose of bond, and allocation of the penal sum among the principal's 
locations.
    Respondents: Business of other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 10.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 10 hours.
    Clearance Officer: William H. Foster, (202) 927-8210, Alcohol and 
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G. Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-25049 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

######  National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, “Technical Support for Constituency Outreach and Research Dissemination”.                     

*Date:*                         January 22, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Room 220, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1439.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 31, 2003.

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-252  Filed 1-6-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2I, Louis Ploth, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Zonagen, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: May 1, 2006 By: /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.         Louis Ploth, Jr.    Vice President Business Development and    Chief Financial Officer    Zonagen, Inc.
### §210107. Nonapplication of audit requirements

The audit requirements of section 10101 of this title do not apply to the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1456.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 210107 | (no source). | |

Section

This section is added to except the Theodore Roosevelt Association from the application of section 10101 of the revised title, restating 36:1101–1103, which imposes audit requirements on certain federally chartered corporations. The Association is not included in the list of corporations set out in 36:1101 to which the audit requirements apply.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-60319

_____________________________________

RAY B. HILL, ET AL,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

AND

KELLEN KNIGHT; FLORA KNIGHT; M D COATS, SR;

LAURA MARIE COATS; JEFFREY MARK COATS,

 Plaintiffs,

VERSUS

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

WILLIE KILGORE, an Individual, and

WAYNE POULTRY DIVISION OF

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY,

a foreign corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

----------------------------------------

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

RAY B. HILL; JUDY HILL,

 Defendants-Appellants.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:95cv191GS)

______________________________________________________

February 6, 1996
 

*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2

Before KING, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants complain of orders of the district court declining

to remand plaintiffs' case to the state court and the order

dismissing plaintiffs' suit. After reviewing the record in this

case and considering the parties' briefs, we find neither error nor

abuse of discretion by the district court. The district court's

judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors 

WebEx Communications, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-61652 and 333-47892) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-67580)on Form S-3 of WebEx Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 4, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of WebEx Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 which report appears in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K of WebExCommunications, Inc. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

March 27, 2003
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB UNDER THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

|   | Re: | HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------|

Series 2006-1, Class A Notes; Series 2006-1, Class B Notes;

|   | Series 2007-1, Class A Notes and Series 2007-2, Class A Notes |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 

I, Dennis J. Mickey, Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer – Treasury of HSBC Finance Corporation (the “Company”), pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission and Section 3.05 of the Second Amended and Restated Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among HSBC Receivables Funding Inc. I, as Transferor, the Company, as Servicer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee of the HSBC Credit Card Master Note Trust (USA) I, hereby certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Company from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period referred to above except as set forth below: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | NONE |
|--------|------|

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on behalf of the Company this 3rd day of March 2008.

 

HSBC Finance Corporation

 

 

By:  /s/ Dennis J. Mickey

Name:  Dennis J. Mickey

Title:  Senior Vice President, 

Chief Operating Officer – Treasury
#### § 838.723 OPM action on receipt of a court order not acceptable for processing.

If OPM receives an application from a former spouse not based on a court order acceptable for processing, OPM will inform the former spouse that OPM cannot approve the application and provide the specific reason(s) for disapproving the application. Examples of reasons for disapproving an application include that the order does not meet the definition of court order in § 838.103 or does not meet one or more of the requirements of subpart H of this part.
### §120110. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for any act of any officer or agent of the corporation acting within the scope of the authority of the corporation.

(Added Pub. L. 110–254, §1(a)(2), June 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2421.)
§ 842.105 Regulatory exclusions. ( a ) OPM is authorized in 5 U.S.C. 8402(c)(1) to “exclude from the operation of this chapter an employee or group of employees in or under an Executive agency, the United States Postal Service, or the Postal Rate Commission, whose employment is temporary or intermittent, except an employee whose employment is part-time career employment (as defined in section 3401(2)).” Therefore, under this authority, OPM is excluding the following: ( 1 ) Employees serving under appointments limited to 1 year or less, unless such appointments meet the definition of provisional appointments contained in §§ 316.401 and 316.403 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Intermittent employees serving under other than career or career conditional appointments.
( b ) When an employee who is covered by FERS moves to a position listed in paragraph (a) of this section without a break in service or after a separation of 3 days or less, his or her FERS coverage will continue, except in the case of an employee hired by the Census Bureau under a temporary, intermittent appointment to perform decennial census duties.
( c ) Paragraph (a) of this section does not deny FERS coverage to an employee who receives an interim appointment under § 772.102 of this chapter and was covered by FERS at the time of the separation for which interim relief is required.
[51 FR 47197, Dec. 31, 1986, as amended at 56 FR 10143, Mar. 11, 1991; 57 FR 3714, Jan. 31, 1992; 63 FR 9402, Feb. 25, 1998]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

           NOTICE REGARDING OMISSION OF CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

      The report of Arthur Andersen LLP dated April 30, 2001 relating to certain
of the financial statements that appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is
incorporated by reference into our Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-56646, 333-53648, 333-59859, 333-48572). Arthur Andersen LLP has not
consented to the incorporation by reference of their report on our financial
statements into those registration statements. We have dispensed with the
requirement to file their consent in reliance upon Rule 437a under the
Securities Act of 1933. Because Arthur Andersen LLP has not consented to the
incorporation by reference of their report into those registration statements,
you will not be able to recover against Arthur Andersen LLP under Section 11(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

      Section 11(a) provides that if any part of a registration statement, at
the time such registration statement becomes effective, contains any untrue
statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any
person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unless such
person knows of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others, every
accountant who has consented to be named as having prepared or certified any
part of the registration statement, or as having prepared or certified any
report or valuation that is used in connection with the registration statement,
with respect to the statement in such registration statement, report or
valuation that purports to have been prepared or certified by the accountant.

      Because we are unable to obtain Arthur Andersen's written consent to the
incorporation by reference of their report on such financial statements, Rule
437a permits us to file registration statements without that written consent.
Because it did not consent, Arthur Andersen does not become subject to liability
under Section 11(a), as discussed above. Consequently, stockholders would be
unable to sue Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) in connection with the
purchase or sale of securities. However, other persons who are subject to
liability under Section 11, including the Company's officer and directors, may
still rely on Arthur Andersen's original audit reports as being made by an
expert for purposes of establishing a due diligence defense under Section 11(b)
of the Securities Act.
### §510. Disclosure of and prohibition on certain donations

(a) In General.—A committee shall not be considered to be the Inaugural Committee for purposes of this chapter unless the committee agrees to, and meets, the requirements of subsections (b) and (c).

(b) Disclosure.—

(1) In general.—Not later than the date that is 90 days after the date of the Presidential inaugural ceremony, the committee shall file a report with the Federal Election Commission disclosing any donation of money or anything of value made to the committee in an aggregate amount equal to or greater than $200.

(2) Contents of report.—A report filed under paragraph (1) shall contain—

(A) the amount of the donation;

(B) the date the donation is received; and

(C) the name and address of the person making the donation.

(c) Limitation.—The committee shall not accept any donation from a foreign national (as defined in section 319(b) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441e(b))).1

(Added Pub. L. 107–155, title III, §308(a)(2), Mar. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 103.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 92–225, Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 3, which was formerly classified principally to chapter 14 (§431 et seq.) of Title 2, The Congress, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering in Title 52, Voting and Elections, and is now classified principally to chapter 301 (§30101 et seq.) of Title 52. Section 319 of this Act is classified to section 30121 of Title 52. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 510 was renumbered section 511 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 6, 2002, see section 402 of Pub. L. 107–155, set out as an Effective Date of 2002 Amendment; Regulations note under section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.

1 See References in Text note below.
### SUBCHAPTER XXI—MENTAL HEALTH COURTS
### §1165. Choice of sex of medical examiner for certain disabilities

(a) In General.—The Secretary shall ensure that a veteran who requires a medical examination from a covered medical provider in support of a claim for compensation under this chapter for a mental or physical health condition that resulted from a physical assault of a sexual nature, battery of a sexual nature, or sexual harassment may designate the sex of the medical provider who provides such medical examination.

(b) Covered Medical Providers.—For purposes of this section, a covered medical provider is any medical provider who is employed by the Department or is under any contract with the Department to provide a medical examination or a medical opinion when such an examination or opinion is necessary to make a decision on a claim.

(c) Notice.—Before providing any medical examination for a veteran in support for a claim described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall notify the veteran of the veteran's rights under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 116–315, title V, §5502(a), Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 5050.)
#### § 831.662 Deposits required to change an election after final adjudication.

The amount of the deposit required under § 831.622 or § 831.685 equals the sum of the monthly differences between the annuity paid to the retiree and the annuity that would have been paid if the additional annuity reduction elected under § 831.622 or § 831.685 had been in effect since the time of retirement, plus 24.5 percent of the increase in the designated base (computed as of the time of retirement) on which the survivor annuity is calculated.

[51 FR 31935, Sept. 8, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 52881, Oct. 13, 1993. Redesignated and amended at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
§ 848.402 Commencing date of composite retirement annuity. ( a ) The commencing date of the composite retirement annuity of a phased retiree who enters full retirement status is the day after separation.
( b ) A phased retirement annuity terminates upon separation from service.
§ 870.103 Correction of errors. ( a ) The employing office may make corrections of administrative errors regarding coverage or changes in coverage. Retroactive corrections are subject to the provisions of § 870.401(f).
( b ) OPM may order correction of an error after reviewing evidence that it would be against equity and good conscience not to do so.