alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10659]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that the objects to be exhibited in the exhibition “The World Between Empires: Art and Identity in the Ancient Middle East,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about March 11, 2019, until on or about June 23, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-24 of January 8, 2019.                

Jennifer Z. Galt,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2019-00086 Filed 1-22-19; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IB 

Union Calendar No. 147

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2059

[Report No. 108–257] 

To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State of New Mexico 

as a National Historic Landmark, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2003

Mr. PEARCE (for himself, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and Mrs. WILSON of 

New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State 

of New Mexico as a National Historic Landmark, and 

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 2059 RH 

1 SECTION 1. FORT BAYARD NATIONAL HISTORIC LAND2 MARK ACT. 

3 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

4 ‘‘Fort Bayard National Historic Landmark Act’’. 

5 (b) DESIGNATION.—The Fort Bayard Historic Dis6 trict in Grant County, New Mexico, as listed on the Na7 tional Register of Historic Places, is hereby designated as 

8 the Fort Bayard National Historic Landmark. 

9 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—Nothing in this section shall 

10 affect the administration of the Fort Bayard Historic Dis11 trict by the State of New Mexico. 

12 (d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary, in 

13 consultation with the State of New Mexico, Grant County, 

14 New Mexico, and affected subdivisions of Grant County, 

15 may enter into cooperative agreements with appropriate 

16 public or private entities, for the purposes of protecting 

17 historic resources at Fort Bayard and providing edu18 cational and interpretive facilities and programs for the 

19 public. The Secretary shall not enter into any agreement 

20 or provide assistance to any activity affecting Fort Bayard 

21 State Hospital without the concurrence of the State of 

22 New Mexico. 

23 (e) TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—The 

24 Secretary may provide technical and financial assistance 

25 with any entity with which the Secretary has entered into 

26 a cooperative agreement under subsection (d). 
3

•HR 2059 RH 

1 (f) NO EFFECT ON ACTIONS OF PROPERTY OWN2 ERS.—Designation of the Fort Bayard Historic District 

3 as a National Historic Landmark shall not prohibit any 

4 actions which may otherwise be taken by any property 

5 owners, including the owners of the Fort Bayard National 

6 Historic Landmark, with respect to their property. 

7 (g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

8 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

9 necessary to carry out this section. 
Union Calendar No. 147

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2059

[Report No. 108–257] 

A BILL

To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the 

State of New Mexico as a National Historic Landmark, and for other purposes. 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Michael Bell, certify that:

 

|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of CareDx, Inc.; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                  |   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|
| Date: October 9, 2018 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Michael Bell |
|                  |   |   |   | Michael Bell |
|                  |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                  |   |   |   | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
§ 890.1001 Scope and purpose. ( a ) *Scope.* This subpart implements 5 U.S.C. 8902a, as amended by Public Law 105-266 (October 19, 1998). It establishes a system of administrative sanctions that OPM may, or in some cases, must apply to health care providers who have committed certain violations. The sanctions include debarment, suspension, civil monetary penalties, and financial assessments.
( b ) *Purpose.* OPM uses the authorities in this subpart to protect the health and safety of the persons who obtain their health insurance coverage through the FEHBP and to assure the financial and programmatic integrity of FEHBP transactions.
§ 831.103 Evidence. ( a ) Standard Form 2806 (Individual Retirement Record) is the basic record for action on all claims for annuity or refund, and those pertaining to deceased employees, deceased Members, or deceased annuitants.
( b ) When the records of the department or agency concerned are lost, destroyed, or incomplete, the department or agency shall request the General Accounting Office, through OPM, to furnish the data that it considers necessary for a proper determination of the rights of the claimant. When an official record cannot develop the required information, the department, agency, or OPM should request inferior or secondary evidence which is then admissible.
#### Adroit Metal Products, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Young’s Windows of America, Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20294

c/w No. 11-20295

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAY NARCISO CONTRERAS,

Defendant-Appellant

-------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAY CONTRERAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-652-1

USDC No. 4:09-CR-199-3

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 11-20294 Document: 00511603766 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2011
No. 11-20294

c/w No. 11-20295

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned appeals are CONSOLIDATED. 

Ray Narciso Contreras pleaded guilty in separate cases of conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to distribute

methamphetamine and was sentenced to concurrent 210-month terms of

imprisonment. Judgment was entered in both cases on November 17, 2010, and

his notices of appeal were dated April 12, 2011, and were filed in the record on

April 20, 2011. Contreras’s notices of appeal were filed five months after the

final judgments were entered and beyond the time for extending the appeal

period under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4). See FED. R. APP.

P.4(b)(1)(A)(i), (b)(4). Contreras did not file a timely notice of appeal as to either

appeal, and he has not asserted any ground for excusable neglect. Therefore, his

appeals are DISMISSED as untimely. See United States v. Leijano-Cruz, 473

F.3d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, his motions for appointment of

counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED AS MOOT.

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

Case: 11-20294 Document: 00511603766 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2011
#### Milton Meiselman, an Infant, by Fanny Meiselman, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Present— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7187** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. PAUL TILLAGE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:08

- cr - 00458

- REP

- RCY

- 1 )

Submitted : January 29, 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Paul Tillage, Appellant Pro Se. Heather L. Hart, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Erik Sean Siebert, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in t his circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul Tillage seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253( c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the di strict court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tillage has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1145 CA 15-00548**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

CARRIANN RAY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

ANNETTE FRANCHINI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES, NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

O’HARA, O’CONNELL & CIOTOLI, FAYETTEVILLE (STEPHEN CIOTOLI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

HINMAN STRAUB P.C., ALBANY (JOSEPH M. DOUGHERTY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered November 19, 2014. The order and judgment granted the motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint and dismissed the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court ( see Ingle v Glamore Motor Sales , 73 NY2d 183, 188-190).

Entered: November 13, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### SUBCHAPTER III—INFORMATION SECURITY
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 2000

 2500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
### SUBCHAPTER II—WARTIME DISABILITY COMPENSATION
#### Rosalie Borysevicz, Appellant, v. Vincent Borysevicz, Respondent.

*1005Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 211 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 211

To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Consumer Product Safety Commission to ban toys which in 
       size, shape, or overall appearance resemble real handguns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TOY HANDGUNS.

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall promulgate a rule in 
accordance with section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2058) to declare as a banned hazardous product under section 8 any toy 
which in size, shape, or overall appearance resembles a real handgun.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Genes, Aneuploidy and Mamalian 
Development.
    Date: November 17, 2004.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Ramada Inn Rockville, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Child Health and Human 
Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Bldg Rm 5B01, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6889, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b39333a2f353a3c3c1b363a323775353233753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b69636a7f656a6c6c4b666a626725656263256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 5, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-25274 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2020026EN.01006401.xml

| 30.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 26/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 26/64

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 66/2018

of 23 March 2018

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2020/83]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/334 of 27 February 2017 correcting the Bulgarian, Dutch, Estonian and German language versions of Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/334 of 27 February 2017 correcting the Bulgarian, Dutch, Estonian and German language versions of Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 on the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, parts and appliances, and on the approval of organisations and personnel involved in these tasks (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66q (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 0334: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/334 of 27 February 2017 (OJ L 50, 28.2.2017, p. 13)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 0334: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/334 of 27 February 2017 (OJ L 50, 28.2.2017, p. 13)’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/334 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 March 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 50, 28.2.2017, p. 13.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Dana D. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2015

No. 04-14-00363-CV

Augustine NWABUISHI, Rose Nwabuishi, Resource Health Services, Inc dba Resource Home 

Health Services, Inc. and Resource Care Corp.,

Appellants

v.

Dana D. MOHAMMADI,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-05341

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief is GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
§ 582.201 Agent to receive process. ( a ) Except as provided in appendix A to this part, appendix A to 5 CFR part 581 lists agents designated to accept service of process under part 581 and this part.
( b ) United States Attorneys are not considered appropriate agents to accept service of process.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

h0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148602

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148602

COA: 318435

Macomb CC: 2011

- 001645

- FC

AMAND HASEEN STITT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, be cause we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.