alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2019035EN.01003501.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 35/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 35/35

---

RECOMMENDATION No 1/2019 OF THE EU-PLO JOINT COMMITTEE

of 31 January 2019

approving the extension of the EU-PA Action Plan [2019/223]

THE EU-PLO JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (the ‘Interim Association Agreement’), was signed on 24 February 1997 and entered into force on 1 July 1997. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, of the other part (the ‘Interim Association Agreement’), was signed on 24 February 1997 and entered into force on 1 July 1997.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 63 of the Interim Association Agreement, the Joint Committee may take decisions and make appropriate recommendations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 63 of the Interim Association Agreement, the Joint Committee may take decisions and make appropriate recommendations.

| (3) | Article 10 of the Rules of Procedures of the Joint Committee provides for the possibility of taking decisions by written procedure between sessions if both Parties so agree. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 10 of the Rules of Procedures of the Joint Committee provides for the possibility of taking decisions by written procedure between sessions if both Parties so agree.

| (4) | The extension of the EU-PA Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The extension of the EU-PA Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION:

Article 1

The Joint Committee, acting by written procedure, recommends that the EU-PA Action Plan be extended for three years as of the date of the adoption of the extension.

Article 2

This Recommendation shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2019.

For the EU-PLO Joint Committee

The President

Kherieh RASSAS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 187, 16.7.1997, p. 3.

1

---
#### § 831.1212 Administrative review of OPM decisions.

The right to administrative review of an initial decision of OPM is set forth in § 831.109 of this part. The right to appeal a final decision of OPM to the Merit Systems Protection Board is set forth in § 831.110 of this part.

[58 FR 12498, Sept. 4, 1968. Redesignated at 59 FR 27214, May 26, 1994]
#### § 892.203 When will my premium conversion begin?

If you are newly employed or newly eligible for FEHB in a covered Executive Branch agency (as described in § 892.201(a)), your salary reduction (through a Federal allotment) and pre-tax benefit will be effective on the 1st day of the first pay period beginning on or after your employing agency receives your enrollment.

[68 FR 56528, Oct. 1, 2003]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.57

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                      EXCESS BENEFIT MASTER TRUST AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT made as of the 3 day of October, 2003 by and between R.
J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") and Wachovia Bank, N.A. (the
"Trustee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS; the predecessor to the Company established a trust (the
"Trust") under the Excess Benefit Master Trust Agreement dated as of February 5,
1988 and amended and restated as of October 12, 1988, entered into by and
between the Company and the Trustee (the "agreement") to provide assets to pay
certain benefits for designated executives;

         WHEREAS; the Company is the successor to the original trust settlor,
RJR Nabisco, Inc., and Wachovia Bank, N.A. is the successor to Wachovia Bank and
Trust Company, N.A.

         WHEREAS, the excess Benefit Master Trust shall continue for the benefit
of the remaining participant Mr. Stephen Wilson and Mr. Champion Mitchell.

         NOW; THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. as successor shall continue in
its role as settlor of the Trust and Wachovia Bank, N.A. shall continue as
Trustee of the Excess Benefit Master Trust Agreement.

         2. This the 3 day of October, 2003.

                                        R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.

                                        s/s Lynn L. Lane
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        By: Lynn L. Lane
                                        Its: Senior Vice President & Treasurer

                                        Wachovia Bank, N.A.

                                        s/s John N. Smith, III
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        By: John N. Smith, III
                                        Its: Senior Vice President & Treasurer
§ 870.203 Post-election BIA. ( a ) The BIA of an individual who elects a Living Benefit under subpart K of this part is the amount of insurance left after the effective date of the Living Benefit election. This amount is the individual's post-election BIA. ( 1 ) The post-election BIA of an individual who elects a full Living Benefit is 0.
( 2 ) If an employee elects a partial Living Benefit, the employee still has some Basic insurance. OFEGLI determines this amount by computing the BIA as of the date it receives the completed Living Benefit application and reducing the amount by a percentage. This percentage represents the amount of the employee's partial Living Benefit payment, compared to the amount the employee could have received if he or she had elected a full Living Benefit. The amount that is left is rounded up or down to the nearest multiple of $1,000. (If the amount is midway between multiples, it is rounded up to the next higher multiple.)
( b ) The post-election BIA cannot change after the effective date of the Living Benefit election.
( c ) If an employee elected a partial Living Benefit and that employee is under age 45 at the time of death, OFEGLI will multiply the post-election BIA by the appropriate factor, as specified in § 870.202(c), in effect on the date 9 months after the date OFEGLI received the completed Living Benefit application.
[75 FR 60576, Oct. 1, 2010]
# **UPDATEOF COMMERCIAL NEWS**

## January 16, 2000 – January 31, 2000

 

# Prepared byAlexander Gordienko

BISNIS Representative 

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

 

### U.S. Ambassador in Nizhny Novgorod 

On January 22, 2000 the U.S. Ambassador to RussiaJames F. Collins visited Nizhny Novgorod to commemorate the 5thanniversary of the American Informational and Educational Center. It was openedin 1995 under the Cooperation Agreement between the Presidents of the USA andRussia and was sponsored by the USIA. The Center’s library has over 4,500 booksin various fields of knowledge, including the history of the UnitedStates.  Moreover, it has a fewmultimedia laboratories with an access to Internet. Mr. Collins had a fewmeetings with the local business community and local authorities, including theone with Governor Sklyarov and top executives of U.S. companies in the NizhnyNovgorod region. 

 

### Tax Break Period for TPZ Extended 

Both Nizhny Novgorod city and regional authoritiesextended a 75 per cent tax exemption period to the local budget in 4Territorial Production Zones until 2005. They are located in 4 NizhnyNovgorod-based defense companies: Petrovsky Plant, Lazur, Salyut andElektromash. Territorial Production Zones were established to support defenseconversion programs in those companies. 

 

### GAZ-FIAT Joint Cooperation Moves on

Mr. Pugin, President of the Gorky Automobile Plant(GAZ), had a meeting with Mr. Cantarella, CEO of FIAT, in Turin, Italy. Bothsides agreed to continue joint cooperation and submit a revised business plan/investment agreement to the Russian Ministry of Economics in March. Theimplementation of the investment project will begin as soon as both documentshave been approved in the Russian Federal level. To make it more affordable forRussian consumers, the Russian-Italian JV plans to sell a substantialpercentage of its FIAT cars on credit.
§ 842.103 General. To be covered under FERS, an individual must: ( a ) Be an employee, Member, or specifically covered by another provision of law;
( b ) Be covered by social security;
( c ) Have retirement deductions withheld from pay and have agency contributions made; and
( d ) Be paid based on units of time.
Except as provided in § 842.104 and as excluded by § 842.105, an employee or Member is covered by FERS.
### §300109. Endowment fund

The endowment fund of the corporation shall be kept and invested under the management and control of a board of trustees elected by the board of governors. The corporation shall prescribe policies and regulations on terms and tenure of office, accountability, and expenses of the board of trustees.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1493; Pub. L. 110–26, §9, May 11, 2007, 121 Stat. 109.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 300109 | 36:9. | Jan. 5, 1905, ch. 23, §8, as added June 23, 1910, ch. 372, §2, 36 Stat. 604; May 8, 1947, ch. 50, §7, 61 Stat. 83. |

Section

The words "from time to time" are omitted [as] unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–26 struck out "nine" before "trustees elected" in first sentence and substituted "The corporation shall prescribe policies and regulations on terms and tenure of office, accountability, and expenses of the board of trustees." for "The board of governors shall prescribe regulations on terms and tenure of office, accountability, and expenses of the board of trustees."
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2309

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2300 Redondo Avenue in Signal Hill, California, as the ‘‘J. Stephen 

Horn Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2003

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2300 Redondo Avenue in Signal Hill, California, as the ‘‘J. Stephen Horn Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 2300 Redondo Avenue in Signal Hill, California, 

6 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J. Stephen Horn 

7 Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 2309 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘J. Stephen Horn Post Office Building’’.

Æ
### §305b. Special pay: service as member of Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team

(a) Special Pay Authorized.—The Secretary of a military department may pay special pay under this subsection to members of an armed force under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who are entitled to basic pay under section 204 and are assigned by orders to duty as members of a Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team if the Secretary determines that the payment of such special pay is needed to address recruitment or retention concerns in that armed force.

(b) Monthly Rate.—The monthly rate of special pay under subsection (a) may not exceed $150.

(c) Inclusion of Reserve Component Members Performing Inactive Duty Training.—(1) To the extent funds are made available to carry out this subsection, the Secretary of a military department may pay the special pay under subsection (a) to members of a reserve component of the armed forces who are entitled to compensation under section 206 of this title and who perform duty under orders as members of a Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team.

(2) The amount of the special pay for a member referred to in paragraph (1) shall be equal to 1/30 of the monthly special pay rate in effect under subsection (b) for each day on which the member performs duty under orders as members of a Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team.

(d) Regulations.—Special pay under this section shall be provided in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

(e) Definition.—In this section, the term "Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Team" means a team of members of the reserve components of the armed forces that is established under section 12310(c) of title 10 in support of emergency preparedness programs to prepare for or to respond to any emergency involving the use of a weapon of mass destruction.

(Added Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title VI, §624(a), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1505.)
#### § 890.1002 Use of terminology.

Unless otherwise indicated, within this subpart the words “health care provider,” “provider,” and “he” mean a health care provider(s) of either gender or as a business entity, in either the singular or plural. The acronym “OPM” and the pronoun “it” connote the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
#### Calcasieu Paper Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Mutual Paper Company, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present— Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### § 847.422 Crediting future NAFI service.

An employee who elects to remain in FERS coverage with credit for NAFI service under § 847.421(a) will be covered by FERS during all periods of future service not excluded from coverage by FERS, including any periods of service with a NAFI and service as a reemployed annuitant.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45894

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

WILLIAM KARYIM HAMMOND,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: October 22, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twelve years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for discharge of a firearm at an occupied 

vehicle, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly A. Coster, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

William Karyim Hammond pled guilty to discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle, 

Idaho Code § 18-3317. The district court imposed a unified sentence of twelve years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of five years, and retained jurisdiction. Hammond appeals, 

contending that his sentence is excessive and that the district court abused its discretion by 

retaining jurisdiction rather than granting his request for probation.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hammond’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### § 630.1211 Health benefits.

An employee enrolled in a health benefits plan under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (established under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code) who is placed in a leave without pay status as a result of entitlement to leave under § 630.1203(a) of this part may continue his or her health benefits enrollment while in the leave without pay status and arrange to pay the appropriate employee contributions into the Employees Health Benefits Fund (established under section 8909 of title 5, United States Code). The employee shall make such contributions consistent with 5 CFR 890.502.

[58 FR 39602, July 23, 1993. Redesignated at 76 FR 60704, Sept. 30, 2011, and further redesignated at 76 FR 60705, Sept. 30, 2011]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles Makar, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
#### Ernest A. Drake, Doing Business as Drake Heating Co., et al., Respondents, v. Pierce Butler Radiator Corporation, Appellant.

Memorandum: The judgment should be modified by reducing the award of $11,075.75 made by the Official Referee to the sum of $5,228.89. The evidence clearly establishes that on all sales of boilers made outside of plaintiff’s territory for installation therein, plaintiff’s commission was limited to 70% of the discount of 20% allowed by defendant to its agents. We feel that the Referee erred in allowing commissions in excess of 70% on such sales. The over-allowance amounts to $802.86. We also reach the conclusion that the Referee erred in allowing plaintiff $4,384 for extra services performed on boiler installations allegedly due to manufacturing defects in said boilers and for allowing $660 for Clayton valve changes. The testimony supporting the claims for such services is admittedly predicated upon a conservative guess. Testimony of such a character fails to justify the allowances made. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in an action under a contract of hiring.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ. [See *post,*p. 844.]
<PAGE>   1
                                 Exhibit 10.47

List of Vice Presidents who have executed an Officer Severance Agreement with
Rightchoice Managed Care, Inc., a Missouri Corporation.

Kevin G. Aandahl                         VP, Corporate and Public Affairs
Julia Bietsch                            VP, Provider Affairs
Mary Cronin Doyle                        VP, Commercial Product Management and
                                                Policy Administration
Ron Ekstrandt                            VP, Strategy
Larry Glascott                           VP, Controller
Ruth Meyer Hollenback                    VP, Network Management
Gary Maienschein                         VP, Government Affairs
Thomas P. Ogden                          VP, Information Services
Jane I. Potter                           VP, Medical Delivery Systems
Randy D. Ressel                          VP, Outstate Sales
Thomas Stoiber                           VP, Actuarial/Underwriting Services
Dennis J. Sullivan                       VP, Operations/Services
Gary Whitworth                           VP, BCBSMo Operations
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Sierra Railroad, Division of Coast Enterprises, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the status of Sierra

Railroad (SR), a division of Coast Enterprises, Inc (CEI), as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.XRRA) and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

(45 U.S.C. § 351 et sea.MRUIA).

SR is a shortline railroad interchanging with Southern Pacific and The Santa Fe railroads,

and operating 49 miles of rail line between milepost 0.0 at Oakdale, CA, and milepost 49.0

at Fassler, CA. SR has no relationship to or with the Sierra Pacific Coast Railway, Inc. DBA

the Eccles and Eastern Railroad Company (BA No. #3789) or Silver Foot, Inc. DBA Sierra

Railroad Company (BA No. 2752).

Information furnished to the Board by SR in a letter dated October 30, 1995, establishes that 

CEI was incorporated on May 2, 1994, but acquired SR and began operations as a shortline

railroad on September 29, 1995 with a Federal employer’s I.D. of #77-0373437. SR has 6

employees who were first compensated on October 1, 1995. Authority for the acquisition

exemption is contained in ICC Finance Docket No. 32818.

Based on the information in the record, the Board finds that effective with the date operations

began, September 29, 1995, Sierra Railroad, a division

as a rail carrier employer under the RRA and the RUIA

Glen L. Bower

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1996-29

BA # 2774
No. IV-09-022 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 June 19, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Charles 

Peabody as the new resident inspector at the Wolf Creek nuclear plant in 

Burlington, Ks. The plant is operated by Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating 

Corp. 

“Charles Peabody’s technical and regulatory experience will assist 

the NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people and the environment 

and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear power plants,” said NRC Region 

IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins. 

Peabody joined the agency’s Region II office in Atlanta, Ga., in 2003, and holds a 

Bachelor’s Degree in nuclear and radiological engineering from the Georgia Institute of 

Technology. He has worked in the Region II Division of Reactor Safety, performing engineering 

inspections. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can be assigned 

to any one site for up to seven years. Peabody joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Chris Long at 

the plant. 

The Wolf Creek resident inspectors can be reached at (620)-364-8653. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128