alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27964]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Information Security Oversight Office

[NARA-2019-009]


State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory 
Committee (SLTPS-PAC)

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing a Federal advisory committee meeting of the 
State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be on January 30, 2019, from 10:00 a.m. to 
12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Archives and Records Administration; 700 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW; Jefferson Room; Washington, DC 20408.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Skwirot, Senior Program 
Analyst, by mail at Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO); 
National Archives Building; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20408, by telephone at 202.357.5398, or by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#03716c616671772d7068746a716c77436d6271622d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7b5a8a5a2b5b3e9b4acb0aeb5a8b387a9a6b5a6e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a>. Contact ISOO at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cc859f83838ca2adbeade2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5ecf6eaeae5cbc4d7c48bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We announce advisory committee meetings in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and 
its implementing regulation (41 CFR 101-6).
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss matters relating to the 
Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, 
Tribal, and Private Sector Entities.
    The meeting is open to the public. However, due to space 
limitations and access procedures, you must submit the name and 
telephone number of individuals planning to attend to the Information 
Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Wednesday, January 23, 
2019. ISOO will provide additional instructions for accessing the 
meeting's location.

Miranda Andreacchio,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-27964 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 110404G]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Saltonstall-Kennedy Grant Program (S-K Program) Applications 
and Reports.
    Form Number(s): NOAA Forms 88-204, 88-205.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0135.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 985.
    Number of Respondents: 210.
    Average Hours Per Response: One hour for a project summary form; 
one hour for a budget form; 2.5 hours for a semi-annual report; and 13 
hours for a final report.
    Needs and Uses: The S-K Program provides financial assistance on a 
competitive basis for research and development projects that benefit 
U.S. fishing communities. The respondents must submit applications, and 
grant recipients must submit semi-annual progress reports and final 
reports.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-
profit organizations; not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or 
Tribal Government.
    Frequency: On occasion, semi-annually, annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187c5061767d73587c777b367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66022e1f08030d2602090548010910">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1c587d6a7578434e736f6877796e5c73717e3279736c327b736a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7034110619142f221f03041b1502301f1d125e151f005e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 3, 2004.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-25091 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
U N IT E D ST A T E S O F A M ERICA

R A IL R O A D R E T IR E M E N T B O A R D

844 N R U SH ST 

C H ICAG O IL 60611-2092

L-9 6 - 1 4

G E N E R A L C O U N SE L

Mr. I APR 191996

Dear Mr.

This is in response to your letter dated March 25, 1996, wherein you requested a 

determ ination as to w hether your refusal of a position as a custom er service 

assurance specialist would constitute a refusal of an offer of employm ent in the sam e 

class or craft.

I have reviewed your letter and the material which you subm itted. As you know, a 

person who has 25 years of railroad service who is involuntarily term inated from his 

railroad position has a deem ed current connection, for purposes of supplem ental and 

survivor benefits, if he does not refuse "an offer of employm ent in the sam e class or 

craft" as his previous employment. You have 25 years of railroad service (385 

m onths through 1995) and w ere involuntarily term inated from your position with the 

Burlington Northern Railroad. See the letter dated April 26, 1995, to you from Mr.

Vice President, Human Resources, Burlington Northern Railroad. 

You have now been offered employment by the Burlington Northern Railroad as a 

custom er service assurance specialist in Topeka, Kansas. Prior to your term ination, 

you w ere a national account m anager, international marketing and sales, at a salary 

of $ 4 ,9 8 0 .0 0 per m onth. The new position is located in Topeka, Kansas and pays 

$ 3 ,4 5 8 .7 9 per month.

Prior decisions of this office have analogized the term "same class or craft" for 

purposes of applying the deem ed current connection provision to m anagem ent 

em ployees as being synonym ous with the term "suitable employment" under the 

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act. See Legal opinion L-89-125. In general, work 

is considered not suitable when the remuneration, hours, or other conditions of work 

are substantially less favorable to the employee than those prevailing in the prior 

position. In your case, the pay would be reduced by approximately 30% . The duties 

of your former position involved promoting the sale of railroad services to various 

shippers. The duties of the new position are quite different in th at they entail 

responding to
service com plaints from custom ers and attem pting to rectify them . In addition, the 

new position would require you to relocate from suburban Chicago to Topeka, Kansas, 

a distance of over 500 miles. In my opinion, should you decline the job offer in 

Topeka, Kansas you would not be considered as having declined an offer of 

em ploym ent in the "sam e class or craft" as your prior job. Consequently, you would 

not be disqualified from having a deem ed current connection by reason of declining 

the Topeka, Kansas job.

Sincerely,

General Counsel

cc: Railroad Retirement Board

District Office 

Joliet, Illinois
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hechinger Liquidation Trust on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Conrad F. Hocking,
the Liquidation Trustee of the Liquidation Trust, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Liquidation Trust. Date: August 13, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Conrad F. HockingConrad F. HockingLiquidation Trustee
**SABIT PROGRAM FY00**

** **

The U.S. Department ofCommerce’s Special American Business Internship Training (SABIT) program, whichprovides funding to U.S. organizations to conduct stateside management trainingfor business executives and scientists from the NIS, will host experts in thefollowing sectoral and regional programs this year. 

 

Novosibirsk - TechnologyCommercialization/Computer Industry

# Program Dates: April 1–29, 2000

 

Caucasus/Central AsiaRegional Development - Building and Home Construction    

Program Dates: June 3–July1, 2000

 

Caucasus/Central AsiaRegional Development - Technology Commercialization

Program Dates: August19–September 16, 2000

 

NIS EnvironmentalTechnologies  - Air PollutionManagement 

Program Dates: June 10–July22, 2000

 

NIS Standards - InformationTechnology

Program Dates: May 22–June17, 2000

 

NIS Standards - LaboratoryAccreditation

Program Dates: October23–November 18, 2000

 

*For more information,contact SABIT at (202) 482-0073, or visit www.mac.doc.gov/sabit/sabit.html.*
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.234 Under what circumstances may people recruited locally receive a post differential? ( a ) Current residents of the area qualify for a post differential if they were originally recruited from outside the differential area and have been in substantially continuous employment by the United States or by U.S. firms, interests, or organizations.
( b ) Examples of persons recruited locally but eligible to receive a post differential include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Those who were originally recruited from outside the area and have been in substantially continuous employment by other Federal agencies, contractors of Federal agencies, or international organizations in which the U.S. Government participates and whose conditions of employment provide for their return transportation to places outside the post differential area,
( 2 ) Those who are temporarily present in the post differential area for travel or formal study at the time they are hired and have maintained actual places of residence outside the area for an appropriate period of time, and
( 3 ) Those who are discharged from U.S. military service in the differential area to accept employment with a Federal agency and have maintained actual places of residence outside the differential area for an appropriate period of time.
#### § 847.201 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains OPM's regulations on the procedures, eligibility requirements, time limits and effects of elections under sections 8347(q) and 8461(n) of title 5, United States Code.
#### § 870.903 Effective date of assignment.

An assignment under this subpart is effective on the date the employing office receives the properly completed, signed, and witnessed assignment form.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Inspection Manual Change Notice 09-012.

Accession Number: ML091330726

Date Released: Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML091330719 - Inspection Manual Change Notice 09-012. (2 page(s), 5/13/2009)
    - ML091120247 - IMC 2600, "Fuel Cycle Facility Operational Safety and Safeguards Inspection Program." (18 page(s), 5/13/2009)
    - ML091260394 - IP 92703, "Followup of Confirmatory Action Letters or Orders." (2 page(s), 5/13/2009)
    - ML091330739 - Table of Contents for Inspection Manual Change Notice 09-012. (44 page(s), 5/13/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Skip to main content    

-  Home 
-  About     -  Mission 
  -  Insignia 
  -  Organizational Chart 
  -  Strategic Plan 
  -  EEO & Diversity 
  -  Contract Opportunities 
-  Resources     -  Advisories/Bulletins/Fact Sheets 
  -  Filing Information 
  -  Financial Institutions 
  -  FinCEN Exchange 
  -  Innovation 
  -  International 
  -  Law Enforcement 
  -  SAR Stats 
  -  Statutes and Regulations 
-  Newsroom     -  News 
  -  Speeches 
  -  Testimony 
  -  Enforcement Actions 
  -  SAR Technical Bulletins 
-  Careers     -  Core Career Descriptions 
  -  Quality of Work Life 
  -  Current Openings 
-  Advisories 
-  Glossary 

Search

## Sidebar Menu

                            - U.S. Department of the Treasury
                            - U.S. Department of Justice
                            - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
                            - Contact Public Affairs

# National Money Laundering Strategies

The U.S. Departments of Treasury, Justice, and Homeland Security periodically issue the*National Money Laundering Strategy* – a report detailing continued efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing networks.
                  - 2007 National Money Laundering Strategy (May 2007)  PDF Only
                  - 2003 National Money Laundering Strategy (November 2003)  PDF Only
                  - 2002 National Money Laundering Strategy (July 2002)  PDF Only
                  - 2001 National Money Laundering Strategy (September 2001)  PDF Only
                  - Treasury & Justice Money Laundering Strategy 2000 (March 2000)  PDF Only
                  - Treasury & Justice Money Laundering Strategy 1999  PDF Only

## Footer menu

Home 

Resources 

Contact 

About 

Careers 

Newsroom 

Site Map 

Contract Opportunities 

USA.govRegulations.govTreasury.govIRS.govFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)NO FEAR ActAccessibilityEEO & Diversity PolicyPrivacy Policy
§ 890.908 Notification of HHS. An FEHB plan, under the oversight of OPM, will notify the Secretary of HHS, or the Secretary's designee, if the plan finds that: ( a ) A hospital knowingly and willfully collects, on a repeated basis, more than the amount determined to be equivalent to the Medicare part A payment under the DRG-based PPS.
( b ) A Medicare participating physician or supplier knowingly and willfully collects, on a repeated basis, more than the amount determined to be equivalent to the Medicare part B payment under the Medicare Participating Physician Fee Schedule.
( c ) A Medicare nonparticipating physician or supplier knowingly and willfully charges, on a repeated basis, more than the amount determined to be equivalent to the Medicare limiting charge amount.
[60 FR 26668, May 18, 1995]
#### Aaron A. Cohen, Appellant, v. Holbrooke Homes, Inc., et al., Respondents.

— Motion to compel acceptance of notice of appeal denied, with $10 costs. (See Civ. Prac. Act, § 612.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
§ 870.906 Cancellation of insurance. ( a ) The right to cancel (or reduce) insurance transfers to the assignee; the insured individual cannot cancel (or reduce) insurance after making an assignment.
( b ) The assignee has the right to cancel insurance according to the provisions of §§ 870.502 and 870.505. When there is more than one assignee, all assignees must agree to the cancellation. A cancellation of Basic insurance also cancels all Optional insurance.
Kodiak Energy, Inc.





EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  April 13, 2011




/s/  Richard Carmichael


Name: Richard Carmichael


Title: Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-07-005 March 29, 2007

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE AT 

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Tennessee Valley

Authority officials on Monday, April 2, to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance

for 2006 at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant, located near Athens, Ala.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 1:00 p.m. (CDT) at the

plant’s Training Center is open to public observation. The NRC staff will present the results of the

assessment and be available to respond to questions or comments from the public before the close of

the meeting. 

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Browns Ferry plant and the nation’s

other commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting is a chance for us to discuss that safety performance with the company, with local officials and

with people living near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of

Units 2 and 3 during the period and will serve as the basis for that meeting’s discussion. It is available

on the NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/bf_2006q4.pdf .

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

depending on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

The NRC said the Browns Ferry plant operated safely during 2006 with all inspection findings

being “green,” or very low safety significance, and all performance indicators also indicating

performance at levels requiring no additional NRC oversight. 

As a result, the NRC plans to conduct only routine baseline inspections for Units 2 and 3 for

the rest of 2007. The NRC staff will also conduct several other inspections, including the independent

spent fuel storage installation and extended power uprate modifications. 
Current information for Browns Ferry Units 2 and 3 is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF2/bf2_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF3/bf3_chart.html .

### 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following web address: http://www.nrc.gov/publicinvolve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent

to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's web site.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6333

STEVEN STUART MARKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief

District Judge. (7:15-cv-00073-GEC-RSB)

Submitted: November 30, 2016 Decided: December 14, 2016

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Stuart Marks, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Stuart Marks seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Marks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED