alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Merrimack,

June, 1897.

#### Murphy *v.*Hill & *a.*

*Burleigh Sg Adams,*for the plaintiff and Franklin Eaton.

*Charles G. Rogers,*for the defendants.

Notice having been given Eaton, after the announcement of the previous opinion in this case at the June term, 1896 (68 N. H. 544), he appeared at the trial term, April, 1897, and assented to the facts previously reported, but offered no evidence. As no claim was made of fraud or mistake in the original entry of judgment in Eaton’s favor in his suit against Clarence E. Hill, the question of law which it was suggested might be presented was not considered, and the views expressed in the opinion heretofore announced were affirmed. It now appearing as a fact that Nancy M. Hill did not join in the covenants sued upon, judgment was ordered for her and for the plaintiff, against Winthrop T. Hill only, .for one dollar damages.

*Case discharged.*
# L_2019192EN.01005901.xml

| 18.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/59

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 104/2019

of 11 April 2019

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1234]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/564 of 28 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date until which counterparties may continue to apply their risk-management procedures for certain OTC derivative contracts not cleared by a CCP (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/564 of 28 March 2019 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the date until which counterparties may continue to apply their risk-management procedures for certain OTC derivative contracts not cleared by a CCP (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 31bcs (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 0564: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/564 of 28 March 2019 (OJ L 99, 10.4.2019, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/564 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 April 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 83/2019 of 29 March 2019, whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 April 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 99, 10.4.2019, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Alma Shurlow, Appellee, v. Lester J. Hoadley, Appellant.

Gen. No. 5,847.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Edgab Eldbedge, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Alma Shurlow against Lester J. Hoadley to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while riding in a buggy with her husband. The injury was caused by defendant’s automobile striking the hind wheel of the buggy when defendant attempted to pass the buggy from behind. The wheel was ‘ ‘dished” *329and that corner of the buggy went down to the ground and plaintiff was injured. From a judgment entered on -a verdict for plaintiff for two thousand dollars, defendant appeals.

McDougall & Chapman, for appellant.

E. J. Kelly and L. W. Brewer, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Automobiles and garages, § *3*
      ***
      *—when instruction erroneous.*In an action for injuries resulting from collision with an automobile in the nighttime, an instruction allowing plaintiff to recover because of a violation of the statute requiring motor vehicles to carry sufficient lights without submitting the questions whether failure to comply with statute caused or contributed to the injuries or whether defendant operated his automobile in a negligent manner, *held*erroneous.

2. Evidence, § *423*
      ***
      *—when expert testimony whether injury was due to accident improper.*In an action for personal injuries permitting expert witnesses to testify, over objection, in answer to hypothetical questions, that in their opinion a fractured rib and a dislocated kidney were due to the accident, *held*improper as such questions were to be determined by the jury.

3. Trial, § *139*
      ***
      *—when remarhs of counsel concerning instructions to he offered hy opponent improper.*Action of plaintiff’s counsel in his address to the jury seeking to cause the jury to look with suspicion upon the instructions to be given on behalf of defendant, *held*improper.

4. Negligence, § *250*
      ***
      *—when admission of improper evidence and improper remarhs of counsel prejudicial.*In an action by a wife for personal injuries, where counsel for plaintiff, over objection, succeeded in getting before the jury the poverty of plaintiff’s husband, and an appeal was made to the jury in behalf of “her little family of children,” though the latter remark was withdrawn, *held*that the effect of such proof and of such remark was prejudicial.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Daniel Nobice PETERS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 04-201

153 S.W.3d 757

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 11, 2004

*Phillip A. McGough,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Daniel Nobice Peters, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Phillip A. McGough, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
NRC STAFF ISSUES GENERIC LETTER ON MANAGING 

GAS ACCUMULATION IN REACTOR SAFETY SYSTEMS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has asked all U.S. nuclear power plant 

operators for information on how they protect certain safety systems from buildup of air, 

nitrogen or other gases that could cause the systems to malfunction. 

 Pockets of gas can damage the pipes, valves and pumps that transport water during a 

reactor emergency. NRC regulations require plant operators to prevent gases from accumulating 

beyond the point where safety systems could be compromised. 

 “U.S. plants are operating safely, but we’ve seen a steady recurrence of gas accumulation 

affecting safety systems over the past 10 years,” said Bill Ruland, Director of the Division of 

Safety Systems in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “We’re asking the plants to 

describe and verify what they’ve been doing to meet our regulations, and we’ll examine their 

answers to see if we need to take more action.” 

 The NRC’s “Generic Letter” asks plant operators to evaluate three basic system types -- 

emergency core cooling, decay heat removal, and containment spray – to determine how their 

design, testing and corrective action programs address gas buildup. The agency asks plant 

operators to provide three types of information from the evaluations: 

 1) The overall results of the evaluations, in sufficient detail to demonstrate how 

the plant meets all applicable NRC regulations; 

2) A description of all corrective actions the plant operator found necessary to meet the 

regulations, and; 

3) A statement including a list of all completed corrective actions, a schedule for any 

remaining actions, and the basis for why that schedule is acceptable. 

 Licensees have nine months to respond. If a plant operator feels it cannot meet this date, 

the operator has three months to describe the actions it will take and why it believes those actions 

are acceptable. A draft letter was published for comment in the Federal Register, and responses 

to public comments have been incorporated into the final document. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-004 January 11, 2008
 The letter will be available electronically on the NRC’s web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/gen-letters/2008/index.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Board Coverage Decision

2010-44.12

Toledo Lorain & Fairport Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4245
#### § 532.411 Details.

An appropriated fund employee detailed to a position other than the position to which appointed shall be paid at the rate of the position to which appointed.
# L_2020210EN.01007301.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/73

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 88/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2020/836]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2032 of 20 November 2018 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2007 concerning the technical specifications for Notices to Skippers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2032 of 20 November 2018 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2007 concerning the technical specifications for Notices to Skippers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 49ac (Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2007) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32018 R 2032: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2032 of 20 November 2018 (OJ L 332, 28.12.2018, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32018 R 2032: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2032 of 20 November 2018 (OJ L 332, 28.12.2018, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2032 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 332, 28.12.2018, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### In the Matter of a Plan for Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering 136 to 138 West 55th Street, Borough of Manhattan, Guaranteed by Lawyers Title and Guaranty Company. (Mortgage No. 430,326.) In the Matter of the Accounting of Samuel J. Krinn, as Trustee, Respondent. 138 West 55th Street Corporation, Appellant.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 901.]
§ 842.801 Applicability and purpose. ( a ) This subpart contains regulations of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to supplement— ( 1 ) 5 U.S.C. 8412(d) and (e), which establish special retirement eligibility for law enforcement officers, members of the Capitol Police and Supreme Court Police, firefighters, nuclear materials couriers, customs and border protection officers, and air traffic controllers employed under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS);
( 2 ) 5 U.S.C. 8422(a), pertaining to deductions;
( 3 ) 5 U.S.C. 8423(a), pertaining to Government contributions; and
( 4 ) 5 U.S.C. 8425, pertaining to mandatory retirement.
( b ) The regulations in this subpart are issued pursuant to the authority given to OPM in 5 U.S.C. 8461(g) to prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 84, in 5 U.S.C. 1104 to delegate authority for personnel management to the heads of agencies and pursuant to the authority given the Director of OPM in section 535(d) of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110-161, 121 Stat. 2042.
[76 FR 42000, July 18, 2011]
### **CHAPTER 1103—JEWISH WAR VETERANS, U.S.A., NATIONAL MEMORIAL, INCORPORATED**

Sec.
110301.
Organization.
110302.
Purposes.
110303.
Governing body.
110304.
Powers.
110305.
Restrictions.
110306.
Principal office.
110307.
Records and inspection.
110308.
Service of process.
110309.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
110310.
Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-10-0045 - Proposed Rule: Requirements for Fingerprint - Based Criminal History Record Checks for Individuals Seeking Unescorted Access to Research or Test Reactors (RIN 3150-A125)

Accession Number: ML100610314

Date Released: Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML100570263 - SECY-10-0045 - Proposed Rule: Requirements for Fingerprint Based Criminal History Records Checks for Individuals Seeking Unescorted Access to Research and Test Reactors (RIN 3150-A125) (11 page(s), 4/9/2010)
    - ML100570303 - SECY-10-0045 - Enclosure 1:  Requirements for Fingerprint Based Criminal History Record Checks for Individual Granted Unescorted Access to Research or Test Reactors - Federal Register Notice (50 page(s), 4/9/2010)
    - ML100610022 - SECY-10-0045 - Enclosure 2:  Regulatory Analysis for Proposed Rule (21 page(s), 4/19/2010)
    - ML100610020 - SECY-10-0045 - Enclosure 3:  Regulatory Analysis Appendix for Proposed RTR Fingerprinting Rule for Unescorted Access (2 page(s), 4/9/2010)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §151511. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1403.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151511 | 36:2009. | Aug. 9, 1982, Pub. L. 97–231, §9, 96 Stat. 257. |

Section
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated this 25th day of March, 2003.



/s/ Merrill W. Sherman
-----------------------------
Merrill W. Sherman
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp
Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>  25
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312

AN ACT

To amend the Communications Satellite of 1962 to

provide for the orderly dilution of the ownershipinterest in Inmarsat by former signatories to theInmarsat Operating Agreement.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2312

AN ACT

To amend the Communications Satellite of 1962 to provide

for the orderly dilution of the ownership interest in

Inmarsat by former signatories to the Inmarsat Operating Agreement.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2312 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ORBIT Technical Cor3 rections Act of 2003’’.

4 SEC. 2. INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING DEADLINES.

5 Clause (ii) of section 621(5)(A) of the Communica6 tions Satellite Act of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 763(5)(A)) is

7 amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and in9 serting ‘‘June 30, 2004’’; and

10 (2) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2003’’ and inserting

11 ‘‘December 31, 2004’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 847.910 If a retiree who elected to credit NAFI service for CSRS immediate retirement returns to work for the Government under conditions that terminate the annuity, how will the retirement annuity be computed when the employee's service with the Government ends? ( a ) If an individual whose annuity terminates upon reemployment with the Government elects to credit NAFI service under subpart B of this part to qualify for a new immediate retirement when the reemployment ends, the annuity will be subject to a reduction under this subpart.
( b ) If an individual whose annuity terminates upon reemployment with the Government qualifies for a new immediate retirement when the reemployment ends without crediting NAFI service, the new annuity will not be subject to a reduction under this subpart.
( c ) If an individual whose annuity terminates upon reemployment with the Government qualifies for a deferred annuity when the reemployment ends, the deferred annuity will not be subject to a reduction under this subpart.
( d ) The reduction in paragraph (a) of this section is computed in accordance with § 847.903 of this subpart as if the individual was retiring for the first time.
#### Albert Zerkowitz, Appellant-Respondent, v. Intra-Mar Shipping Corp. et al., Respondents-Appellants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1808

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an immediate deduction for start-up and organizational expenditures in order to spur entrepreneurship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of 

Florida, and Mr. SOUDER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an 

immediate deduction for start-up and organizational expenditures in order to spur entrepreneurship.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Remove Tax Barriers 

5 for Entrepreneurs Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPENSING OF START-UP AND ORGANIZATIONAL 

7 EXPENDITURES. 

8 (a) START-UP EXPENDITURES.—
2

•HR 1808 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 

2 195(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat3 ing to election to amortize) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘such period of not less than 60 months’’ and in5 serting ‘‘such period of months’’. 

6 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

7 (A) Section 195(b) of such Code is amend8 ed in the heading by striking ‘‘AMORTIZE’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘DEDUCT’’. 

10 (B) Section 195(b)(2) of such Code is 

11 amended in the heading by striking ‘‘AMORTIZA12 TION’’ and inserting ‘‘SELECTED’’. 

13 (b) ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENDITURES.—

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 

15 248 of such Code (relating to organizational expend16 itures) is amended by striking ‘‘such period of not 

17 less than 60 months’’ and inserting ‘‘such period of 

18 months’’. 

19 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

20 248(a) of such Code is amended in the heading by 

21 striking ‘‘AMORTIZE’’ and inserting ‘‘DEDUCT’’. 

22 (c) ORGANIZATIONAL AND SYNDICATION FEES OF

23 PARTNERSHIPS.—
3

•HR 1808 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 

2 709(b) of such Code (relating to amortization of or3 ganization fees) is amended—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘such period of not less 

5 than 60 months’’ and inserting ‘‘such period of 

6 months’’, and 

7 (B) by striking ‘‘such 60-month period’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘such period’’. 

9 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

10 709(b) of such Code is amended in the heading by 

11 striking ‘‘AMORTIZATION’’ and inserting ‘‘DEDUC12 TION’’. 

13 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

14 this section shall apply to elections made after the date 

15 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER II—INVESTIGATIONS