alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 720.901 Equal opportunity without regard to politics or marital status. ( a ) *In appointments and position changes.* In determining the merit and fitness of a person for competitive appointment or appointment by noncompetitive action to a position in the competitive service, an appointing officer shall not discriminate on the basis of the person's political affiliations, except when required by statute, or on the basis of marital status
( b ) *In adverse actions and termination of probationers.* An agency may not take an adverse action against an employee covered by part 752 of this chapter, not effect the termination of a probationer under part 315 of this chapter, ( 1 ) for political reasons, except when required by statute, or
( 2 ) because of marital status.
(5 U.S.C. 2301, 2302, 7202, 7203, 7204)
[44 FR 48149, Aug. 17, 1979]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

|Date: March 30, 2004 |  | /s/KEVIN RAKINKevin Rakin Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
### §3841. Prohibitions

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is unlawful for any person—

(1) to act in violation of this chapter, or any regulation prescribed under this chapter;

(2) to sell or distribute in domestic or international commerce organotin or an antifouling system containing organotin;

(3) to manufacture, process, or use organotin to formulate an antifouling system;

(4) to apply an antifouling system containing organotin on any vessel to which this chapter applies; or

(5) after the Convention enters into force for the United States, to apply or otherwise use in a manner inconsistent with the Convention, an antifouling system on any vessel that is subject to this chapter.

#### (b) Vessel hulls

Except as provided in subsection (c), no vessel shall bear on its hull or outer surface any antifouling system containing organotin, regardless of when such system was applied, unless that vessel bears an overcoating which forms a barrier to organotin leaching from the underlying antifouling system.

#### (c) Limitations

#### (1) Excepted vessel

Subsection (b) does not apply to fixed or floating platforms, FSUs, or FPSOs that were constructed prior to January 1, 2003, and that have not been in dry dock on or after that date.

#### (2) Sale, manufacture, etc.

This section does not apply to—

(A) the sale, distribution, or use pursuant to any agreement between the Administrator and any person that results in an earlier prohibition or cancellation date than specified in this chapter; or

(B) the manufacture, processing, formulation, sale, distribution, or use of organotin or antifouling systems containing organotin used or intended for use only for sonar domes or in conductivity sensors in oceanographic instruments.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1031, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3027.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1), (4), (5) and (c)(2)(A), was in the original "this title", meaning title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3023, which enacted this chapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title X to the Code, see Tables.
1995 RUSSIA DUMA WRAP UP

----
# L_2019021EN.01006601.xml

| 24.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 21/66

---

RECOMMENDATION No 1/2018 OF THE EU-ISRAEL ASSOCIATION COUNCIL

of 27 December 2018

approving the extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan [2019/106]

THE EU-ISRAEL ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (‘the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement’), was signed in Brussels on 20 November 1995 and entered into force on 1 June 2000. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part (‘the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement’), was signed in Brussels on 20 November 1995 and entered into force on 1 June 2000.

| (2) | Article 69 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement gives the Association Council the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 69 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement gives the Association Council the power to take decisions and make appropriate recommendations.

| (3) | Article 10 of the Rules of Procedures of the Association Council provides for the possibility of taking decisions or recommendations by written procedure between sessions, if the Parties so agree. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 10 of the Rules of Procedures of the Association Council provides for the possibility of taking decisions or recommendations by written procedure between sessions, if the Parties so agree.

| (4) | The extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan for three years will give the Parties the opportunity to take forward their cooperation for the coming years, including through the possible negotiation of partnership priorities,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION:

Article 1

The Association Council, acting by written procedure, recommends that the EU-Israel Action Plan be extended for three years as of the date of the adoption of the extension.

Article 2

This Recommendation shall take effect on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 27 December 2018.

For the EU-Israel Association Council

President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 21.6.2000, p. 3.

1

---
Order entered January 7, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00111
- CV
ALEJANDRO CASILLAS P RIETO, Appellant

V. RICHARD RENE ALAMIA, ET AL., RAFAEL DE L A GARZA, II & (FNU) DE LA GARZA, Appellee s On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416
- 02393
- 2016



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s December 21, 2018 second pro se motion for leave to make documentation pa rt of the appeal record. Appellant filed his first motion on November 26,
2 018 with various correspondence attached explaining why he failed to serve one defendant at that defendant’s proper address. By order dated November 28, 2018, the Court ruled as fol lows:
The documents attached to appellant’s motion are part of the appellate record to the extent they are attached to appellant’s motion. To the extent appellant’s motion was intended to supplement the clerk’s record with the documents, the motion is DEN IED

. Appellant states in the pending motion he does not understand “if the attached documents were or were not made part of the case/appeal record,” asks for clarification, and resubmits the documents “in the event” they were not “m a[d]e part of the recor d.”We determine the motion as follows. To clarify, the documents are not part of the clerk’s

record. Although the documents are on file with the Court, they do not constitute part of the record that will be considered in determining this appeal. To the e xtent appellant resubmits the documents, we construe the motion as a request for reconsideration and DENY the motion.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
### §220551. Definitions

In this subchapter, the term "joint resolution" means a joint resolution—

(1) which does not have a preamble; and

(2) for which—

(A)(i) the title is only as follows: "A joint resolution to dissolve the board of directors of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee"; and

(ii) the matter after the resolving clause—

(I) is as follows: "That Congress finds that dissolving the board of directors of the United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee would not unduly interfere with the operations of chapter 2205 of title 36, United States Code"; and

(II) prescribes adequate procedures for forming a board of directors of the corporation as expeditiously as possible and in a manner that safeguards the membership and voting power of the representatives of amateur athletes at all times, consistent with the membership and voting power of amateur athletes under section 220504(b)(2); or

(B)(i) the title is only as follows: "A joint resolution relating to terminating the recognition of a national governing body"; and

(ii) the matter after the resolving clause is only as follows: "That Congress determines that __________________, which is recognized as a national governing body under section 220521 of title 36, United States Code, has failed to fulfill its duties, as described in section 220524 of title 36, United States Code", the blank space being filled in with the name of the applicable national governing body.

(Added Pub. L. 116–189, §5(a)(2), Oct. 30, 2020, 134 Stat. 946.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 116–189, §5(c), Oct. 30, 2020, 134 Stat. 947, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this subchapter and redesignating subchapter III relating to United States Center for SafeSport as subchapter IV] shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 2020]."
### SUBCHAPTER I—EXISTING SPECIAL PAY, INCENTIVE PAY, AND BONUS AUTHORITIES
(December 15, 1947.)

#### In the Matter of the Application of Brooklyn Bar Association. William E. Magee, an Attorney.

Proceeding dismissed. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
#### § 734.501 Permitted and prohibited activities.

Except as otherwise specified in this part 734, employees who are appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate are subject to the provisions of subparts B and C of this part.
### §152910. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1421.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152910 | 36:2911. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–561, §11, 98 Stat. 2912. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "Nothing in this section shall be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit 32.1


                           BEERE FINANCIAL EQUITY CORP
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Beere Financial Equity Corp (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Norman J. Birmingham, the President and Director of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Norman J. Birmingham
--------------------------
Norman J. Birmingham
President
April 26, 2006


The foregoing certifications are made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for
any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.1








STELLAR RESOURCES LTD.


OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stellar Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray Jefferd, President and CEO,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated  March 15, 2010








/s/ Ray Jefferd


Ray Jefferd


President & CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

TRAVIS WILFORD BOWLES, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE 

CONNIE J. STEINHEIMER, DISTRICT 

JUDGE, 

Res • ondents. 

No. 84929 

FILED 

JUL 29 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERKgF SiPREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUll< 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or in 

the alternative to show cause pursuant to NRS 34.160 et seq. seeking to 

compel the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and consider the 

merits of petitioner's habeas petition. 

This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus 

and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole 

discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial 

Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner 

bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted and such 

relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy 

at law. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 

P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). 

Although petitioner provided a brief affidavit wherein he 

references the dismissal of a habeas petition, he has not provided this court 

with any record or documentation in support of his claims and necessary for 

this court's consideration of the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that 

petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 1947A 44#2P. 
understand[ing] the matters set forth in the petition"). We conclude that 

petitioner has failed to demonstrate our intervention by extraordinary writ 

is warranted. Therefore, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in 

this matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Prit,ALA

Parraguirre 

C.J. 

J. 

Hardesty 

Al•ZSbas-.0 J. 

Stiglich 

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge 

Travis Wilford Bowles 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A .46t,o 

2
# L_2017089EN.01000101.xml

| 1.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/1

---

Information concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement amending for the second time the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement

The Agreement amending for the second time the Partnership Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, as first revised in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005
   (1), enters into force on 1 April 2017, in accordance with Article 93(3) of the Agreement, as the last instrument of ratification or approval was deposited on 27 January 2017.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 287, 4.11.2010, p. 3.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2254 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2254

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1101 Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, as the ``Bruce 
                    Woodbury Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1101 
Colorado Street in Boulder City, Nevada, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Bruce Woodbury Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bruce Woodbury Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NRC SEEKS PARTICIPANTS FOR UPCOMING DISCUSSIONS 

ON DRAFT SAFETY CULTURE POLICY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will host several public workshops next year to 

gather input on the agency’s draft policy statement on “safety culture,” and the staff wants to 

hear from individuals interested in participating in the workshops’ roundtable discussions. 

“Safety culture is not a simple issue, but it is vital to the NRC’s mission of protecting the 

public’s health and safety,” said NRC Chairman Gregory B. Jaczko. “Public involvement is 

critical to addressing the complexities of this topic and I welcome and encourage the public’s 

participation in the upcoming discussions.” 

 The Commission recently published the draft safety culture policy statement in the 

Federal Register, (http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-26816.pdf ), setting forth the 

NRC’s expectation that all licensees and certificate holders establish and maintain a safety 

culture that protects public health and safety and the common defense and security. The draft 

policy defines safety culture as: “That assembly of characteristics, attitudes and behaviors in 

organizations and individuals which establishes that as an overriding priority, nuclear safety and 

security issues receive the attention warranted by their significance.” 

The workshops, described in another Federal Register notice 

(http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-29793.pdf), are tentatively scheduled for February, 

April and October 2010. The staff expects the workshops will help forge a consensus around the 

objectives, strategies, activities and measures that enhance safety culture for NRC-regulated 

activities. The effort should also help develop high-level description/traits of areas important to 

safety culture. These concepts will be incorporated into the final safety culture policy statement 

and could also be incorporated into the NRC’s oversight programs. 

Individuals or organizations interested in participating should submit names of 

individuals who will represent a group (or themselves) to Alex Sapountzis or Maria Schwartz, by 

mail to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Enforcement, Concerns Resolution 

Branch, Mail Stop O-4 A15A, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to 

Alexander.Sapountzis@nrc.gov or Maria.Schwartz@nrc.gov. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-200 December 18, 2009