alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 841.504 Agency responsibilities. ( a ) Each employing agency is required to contribute the total amount of the normal cost percentage for each category of its employees, determined under § 841.413 of this part, to the Fund.
( b ) Each employing agency must withhold the appropriate amount of employee deductions from the basic pay paid each covered employee for each pay period. No employee deduction is due if an employee receives no basic pay for a pay period.
( c ) An employing agency must record the appropriate amount of employee deductions on an individual retirement record maintained for each employee in the manner prescribed by OPM.
( d ) When an employee separates from Federal service or transfers to another agency, or transfers to a position in which he or she is not covered by FERS, the agency must close the employee's Individual Retirement Record (IRR) and forward it to OPM within the time standards prescribed by OPM. However, if an employee transfers to another position covered under FERS— ( 1 ) Within the same agency, and
( 2 ) To a position serviced by another payroll office, the agency may, in lieu of forwarding an IRR to OPM at the time of the intra-agency transfer, record the transfer for future IRR certification in an internal automated system of records.
( e ) An agency must maintain payroll systems and records in such manner as to permit accurate and timely reporting to OPM, in the manner prescribed by OPM.
( f ) An agency must report the employee deduction and agency contribution amounts for each pay period in the manner prescribed by OPM.
( g ) An agency must make such other reports of the normal cost, employee deductions and Government contributions amounts as are prescribed and in the manner prescribed by OPM.
( h ) An agency must remit in full the total amount of normal cost (which includes both employee deductions and Government contributions), so that payment is received by the Fund on the day of payment to the employee of the basic pay from which the employee deductions were made.
( i ) Upon the death of an employee whose tour of duty is less than full time, the employing agency must certify to OPM— ( 1 ) The number of hours that the employee was entitled to basic pay (whether in a duty or paid-leave status) in the 52-week work year immediately preceding the end of the last pay period in which the employee was in a pay status; and
( 2 ) If the employee's tour of duty was part time (regularly scheduled), the number of hours of work in the employee's tour of duty.
[52 FR 2057, Jan. 16, 1987, and 52 FR 25196, July 6, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 16535, May 10, 1988; 65 FR 21119, Apr. 20, 2000]
### §170110. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1442.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170110 | 36:1165. | Aug. 11, 1971, Pub. L. 92–93, §15, 85 Stat. 319. |

Section
Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114188 of Air France-KLM (the Company) on Form F-3 of our report relating to the financial statements of the Company dated
June 27, 2006 (July 18, 2006 as to Notes 41 to 42), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2006. This report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (i) the
Companys change in method of accounting for financial instruments effective April 1, 2005, (ii) the full recognition of KLM pension fund surplus based on the current status of the related discussions of the International Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee and the adjustments made to the comparative consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2005 as compared to those published in the interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30,
2005, as a result of applying this accounting policy, and (iii) the fact that International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Commission for use in the European Union vary in certain significant respects from accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America; information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Notes 41 and 42 of the consolidated financial statements.



|                                        |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ for Deloitte & Associés             |  | 
|Neuilly-sur-Seine, France July 18, 2006 |  |
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Escalante Western Railway APR 0 8 2004

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

Escalante Western Railway (EWR) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act

(45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351 et seq.) (RUIA).

In 1973, Western Fuels Association, Inc. (WFAI) became part ofthe “coal chain’" that

utilizes America’s vast coal reserves and brings them to the consumer market.

According to a press release, Western Fuels Association, Inc. is a not-for-profit and

consumer-driven business that produces coal. WFAI contracts coal transportation

sendees with Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Union Pacific, both covered employers

under the Acts. At issue before the Board is WFAI’s operation of Escalante Western

Railway, which connects another producer’s coal mine in New Mexico to one of its

nearby power plants.

Information regarding EWR was provided by Rod Wolf, Director of Rail Operations for

WFAI. According to Mr. Wolf, EWR is owned by WFAI and began operations in 1984.

He also stated that EWR employs four employees. Mr. Robert P. Norrgard is the chief

executive officer of EWR. Mr. Wolfstated that the EWR provides rail service from the

Escalante Generating Station, approximately 4.0 miles on the Palmer Spur and then 37

miles on the Lee Ranch Coal Spur to the Lee Ranch Mine; however, EWR is a private

carrier and does not interchange with any rail carriers covered under the RRA.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as relevant

here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Surface

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49, United States

Code;

Section 1 ofthe RUIA contains essentially the same definition, as does section 3231 of

the Railroad Retirement Tax Act.

The information summarized above indicates that Escalante Western Railway does not

operate, and never has operated, as a rail common carrier. Rather, Western Fuels

Association, Inc. established EWR for the sole purpose of transporting coal to one of its

power plants. Further, there is no evidence that EWR provides any service in

connection with the interstate transportation of freight or passengers by rail within the

meaning of the RRA and RUIA.
-2-

Escalante Western Railway

Accordingly, it is the determination of the Board that Escalante Western Railway is not

an employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0188 - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Participation in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Halden Reactor Project During 2009-2011

Accession Number: ML083400509

Date Released: Monday, December 22, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML083370440 - SECY-08-0188 - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Participation in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Halden Reactor Project During 2009-2011 (4 page(s), 12/5/2008)
    - ML083400500 - SECY-08-0188 - Enclosure: Extended Summary of NRC Involvement In the Halden Reactor Project (5 page(s), 12/5/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30


                                January 12, 2004

Mr. Philip J. Purcell
Morgan Stanley
2500 Lake Cook Road
Riverwoods, IL 60015

Dear Phil:

         This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of
your director's fees in 2004.

         1. All director's fees and retainers ("Fees") payable to you in
connection with your service on the boards of directors (including committees of
such boards) of AMR Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004, will be deferred and paid to you in
accordance with this letter agreement.

         2. Fees will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with
the Directors' Stock Equivalent Purchase Plan, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A (the "Plan").

         3. Within 30 days of the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation, the Stock Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be
converted to cash and paid to you by multiplying the number of such Stock
Equivalent Units by the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock
("fair market value") during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR
Corporation.

         4. AMR's obligation to make the payment pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof
will not be released or modified by reason of your death. In such event, the
number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of death will be multiplied by
the fair market value of AMR stock during the calendar month immediately
preceding your death, and the amount paid to Anne Purcell.

<PAGE>

         If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one
of the originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.

                                               Very truly yours,



                                               Charles D. MarLett
                                               Corporate Secretary


Accepted and agreed:


 /s/ Philip J. Purcell
------------------------------
Philip J. Purcell


 1/20/2004
------------------------------
Date
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Mohall Railroad, Inc.

JAN 1 0 2001

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the

status of Mohall Railroad, Inc., as an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seep) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seep) (RUIA).

Information regarding Mohall Railroad was provided by Byron D. Olsen,

counsel for Mohall. Information was also found in Surface Transportation

Board (STB) Finance Docket No. 33855.

Mohall purchased a rail line of 42.55 miles in North Dakota from the Burlington

Northern Santa Fe. Mohall has no employees but has contracted with the

Northern Plains Railroad, an employer under the RRA and the RUIA (B.A. No.

2642), to operate the rail line. The rail operation will interchange with the

Northern Plains Railroad. The beginning date of operations was June 1, 2000.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board under Part A. of subtitle IV of title

49, United States Code;

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition, as does section 3231

of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

In its decision regarding the employer status of Railroad Ventures. Inc. (B.C.D.

00-47), the Board held that an entity that has STB authority to operate a rail

line, but leases or contracts with another to operate the line in question, is

covered under the Acts administered by the Board unless the Board

determines that the entity is not a carrier. The Board enunciated a three-part

test in B.C.D. No. 00-47 to be applied in making this determination. An entity

that leases a line to another company or contracts with another company to

operate the line is a carrier under the Railroad Retirement Act unless the

Board finds that all three of the following factors exist: 1) the entity does not

have as a primary business purpose to profit from railroad activities: 2) the

entity does not operate or retain the capacity to operate the rail line; and 3) the

BA# 2652
-2-

Mohall Railroad, Inc.

operator of the rail line is already covered or would be found to be covered

under the Acts administered by the Board.

According to the above-cited Surface Transportation Board decision, the

purpose of the Mohall operation is to provide rail service to “two presently

active shippers * * * and any other parties desiring rail service * * * .” There is

no information that would indicate that Mohall Railroad. Inc.’s intent in

purchasing the line is primarily designed to preserve rail service rather than

profit from railroading activities. Accordingly, the Board finds that Mohall has

as a primary business purpose to profit from railroad activities. The Board

therefore finds that Mohall became a rail carrier employer under section

l(a)(l)(i) of the RRA and the corresponding sections of the RUIA beginning

June 1, 2000, the date it began operations.

erome F. Kever
NRC PUBLISHES SURVEY RESULTS ON NUCLEAR ACCIDENT 

RESPONSE STRATEGIES TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission released today a publication that provides new 

insights into how best to protect the public during a nuclear power plant accident. The 

publication is based on the results of focus groups and telephone surveys conducted in the 

Emergency Planning Zones (EPZs) around reactor sites. The data will help the NRC review its 

regulations and guidance related to emergency preparedness and determine if changes need to be 

considered to existing protective action strategies. 

Focus groups were used in 2007 to collect information that guided the development of the 

phone survey. The phone survey was administered in 2008 by Sandia National Laboratories, 

under contract to the NRC, to approximately 2,500 households randomly selected in order to 

obtain 800 completed, anonymous surveys. 

The surveys found that a majority of the residents living within the EPZs of nuclear 

power plants: 

 Were generally well informed about what to do in a nuclear power plant 

emergency; 

 Remembered receiving emergency response information from the nuclear power 

plant and kept it readily accessible; 

 Recalled receiving information about evacuation and sheltering; 

 Agreed they would evacuate, shelter-in-place or monitor for more information, if 

directed to do so; and 

 Agreed they would support a staged evacuation, during which some residents 

would shelter while others would evacuate. 

 

The survey also found that many parents will get their children from school even when 

told they were already being evacuated and that many “special needs” residents who don’t live in 

special facilities had not registered for evacuation assistance. 

Based on the results of the survey, the NRC, in partnership with the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA), is proceeding with revision of “NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, 

criteria for Protective Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents,” which provides guidance 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-206 November 13, 2008
for protective action strategies for severe accidents at nuclear power plants. NRC will seek 

stakeholder input during the process to revise Supplement 3. In addition, NRC will work with 

stakeholders and its federal partners, including FEMA, to address the findings of the study. 

The full report, titled, “Review of NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, Criteria for Protective 

Action Recommendations for Severe Accidents,” can be found at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/nuregs/contract/cr6953/vol2/. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC SCHEDULES OPEN HOUSE TO DISCUSS THE 

 2008 PERFORMANCE OF RIVER BEND NUCLEAR STATION 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for April 23, in 

St. Francisville, La., and will be available to discuss and answer questions about the 2008 safety 

performance of the River Bend Station nuclear power plant. The plant, located in St. Francisville, is 

operated by Entergy Operations, Inc., 

The open house is informal and scheduled to run between 4 and 6 p.m. at the River Bend 

Station Training Center Auditorium, 5485 U.S. Hwy. 61N in St. Francisville. 

The NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety 

performance of River Bend Station, as well as the NRC=s role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of River Bend Station and the nation=s other 

commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. AThis 

open house will provide an opportunity for local officials and interested members of the public to 

talk to NRC staff about our assessment of the plant’s safety performance.” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the 

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/rbs_2008q4.pdf. 

 

The NRC said River Bend operated safely during 2008 and will receive the very detailed 

inspection regime during 2009 used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. 

These inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant 

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

 Telephone: (817) 860-8128 

No. IV-09-011 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

April 6, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov
Current performance information for River Bend Station is available on the NRC web site 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/RBS1/rbs1_chart.html. 

 

### 

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
No. II-09-042 July 20, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SENDS SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO B&W IN LYNCHBURG, VA. 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has dispatched a Special Inspection team to 

B&W Nuclear Operations Group in Lynchburg, Va., to assess the circumstances associated with 

a July 15 event that prompted the facility to go into alert status for nearly five hours. 

A saw used to cut fuel components was found to have discharged oil which contained an 

unknown amount of highly enriched uranium into a receptacle. Plant personnel identified that the 

situation represented a loss of safety controls for uranium and declared an alert. The material was 

analyzed and it was learned that only a small amount of uranium was in the oil, leading to an exit 

of the alert at 12:35 a.m. on July 16. 

An alert is the lowest level of NRC emergency classifications for fuel facilities such as 

B&W. However, the event in the plant’s Uranium Recovery area created the potential for a 

criticality, which can occur when highly enriched uranium accumulates in sufficient quantity and 

shape to initiate a chain reaction resulting in either a “burst” or a sustained release of radiation. 

The NRC Special Inspection team, composed of experts from the agency’s Region II 

offices as well as its Rockville, Md., headquarters, will be tasked with reviewing the factors that 

led to the build up of enriched uranium. The four-member team, which will include an operations 

inspector and two criticality safety specialists, is expected to spend about a week on the site. 

The NRC inspection will also include a review of B&W’s own investigation of the 

incident’s root cause. The NRC inspection team will issue a publicly available report within a 

few days of the inspection’s completion. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §904. Hostage and Wrongful Detainee flag

(a) Designation.—The Hostage and Wrongful Detainee flag championed by the Bring Our Families Home Campaign is designated as the symbol of the commitment of the United States to recognizing, and prioritizing the freedom of, citizens and lawful permanent residents of the United States held as hostages or wrongfully detained abroad.

(b) Required Display.—

(1) In general.—The Hostage and Wrongful Detainee flag shall be displayed at the locations specified in paragraph (3) on the days specified in paragraph (2).

(2) Days specified.—The days specified in this paragraph are the following:

(A) U.S. Hostage and Wrongful Detainee Day, March 9.

(B) Flag Day, June 14.

(C) Independence Day, July 4.

(D) Any day on which a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States—

(i) returns to the United States from being held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad; or

(ii) dies while being held hostage or wrongfully detained abroad.

(3) Locations specified.—The locations specified in this paragraph are the following:

(A) The Capitol.

(B) The White House.

(C) The buildings containing the official office of—

(i) the Secretary of State; and

(ii) the Secretary of Defense.

(c) Display To Be in a Manner Visible to the Public.—Display of the Hostage and Wrongful Detainee flag pursuant to this section shall be in a manner designed to ensure visibility to the public.

(d) Limitation.—This section may not be construed or applied so as to require any employee to report to work solely for the purpose of providing for the display of the Hostage and Wrongful Detainee flag.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVIII, §1804(a)(2)(A), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 686.)
### §12313. Information programs

The Attorney General shall compile information regarding sex offender treatment programs and ensure that information regarding community treatment programs in the community into which a convicted sex offender is released is made available to each person serving a sentence of imprisonment in a Federal penal or correctional institution for a commission of an offense under chapter 109A of title 18 or for the commission of a similar offense, including halfway houses and psychiatric institutions.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40154, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13943 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.