alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of Dicut, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his
knowledge, that:

     1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company complies in all
material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.     The information contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly
presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company; and

Date: February 17, 2003


/s/ Raj Kalra
Raj Kalra, Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Pierre Quilliam
Pierre Quilliam, Chief Financial Officer
### §20109. Sexual assault survivors' notification grants

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General may make grants as provided in section 20103(c)(1)(A) of this title to States to develop and disseminate to entities described in subsection (c)(1) of this section written notice of applicable rights and policies for sexual assault survivors.

#### (b) Notification of rights

Each recipient of a grant awarded under subsection (a) shall make its best effort to ensure that each entity described in subsection (c)(1) provides individuals who identify as a survivor of a sexual assault, and who consent to receiving such information, with written notice of applicable rights and policies regarding—

(1) the right not to be charged fees for or otherwise prevented from pursuing a sexual assault evidence collection kit;

(2) the right to have a sexual assault medical forensic examination regardless of whether the survivor reports to or cooperates with law enforcement;

(3) the availability of a sexual assault advocate;

(4) the availability of protective orders and policies related to their enforcement;

(5) policies regarding the storage, preservation, and disposal of sexual assault evidence collection kits;

(6) the process, if any, to request preservation of sexual assault evidence collection kits or the probative evidence from such kits; and

(7) the availability of victim compensation and restitution.

#### (c) Dissemination of written notice

Each recipient of a grant awarded under subsection (a) shall—

(1) provide the written notice described in subsection (b) to medical centers, hospitals, forensic examiners, sexual assault service providers, State and local law enforcement agencies, and any other State agency or department reasonably likely to serve sexual assault survivors; and

(2) make the written notice described in subsection (b) publicly available on the Internet website of the attorney general of the State.

#### (d) Provision to promote compliance

The Attorney General may provide such technical assistance and guidance as necessary to help recipients meet the requirements of this section.

#### (e) Integration of systems

Any system developed and implemented under this section may be integrated with an existing case management system operated by the recipient of the grant if the system meets the requirements listed in this section.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1404F, as added Pub. L. 114–236, §3, Oct. 7, 2016, 130 Stat. 967.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 10603f of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1403

To remove the exemption with respect to Pakistan from the prohibition 

on assistance to a country whose elected head of government was deposed 

by decree or military coup. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. PALLONE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To remove the exemption with respect to Pakistan from 

the prohibition on assistance to a country whose elected 

head of government was deposed by decree or military 

coup.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF EXEMPTION FROM PROHIBITION 

4 ON MILITARY ASSISTANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act to authorize the President to exercise waivers of for7 eign assistance restrictions with respect to Pakistan 

8 through September 30, 2003, and for other purposes’’, ap-
2

•HR 1403 IH 

1 proved October 27, 2001 (Public Law 107–57), is re2 pealed. 

3 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The repeal made by subsection 

4 (a) shall apply to all funds expended on or after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, and to any funds obligated 

6 before the date of the enactment of this Act that have 

7 not been expended as of such date of enactment.

Æ
#### Theodore Heos, an Infant, by Peter Heos, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Irving Ladner, Doing Business as Highway Auto Renting Company, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision of June 8, 1953 *{ante,*p. 707). Present — Adel, Acting F. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ. Motion to relieve appellants from the withdrawal of question of the power of the Special Term to refer motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine and for other relief denied, without costs. Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion to dispense with printing of record and brief granted. The appellants may prosecute the appeal on a typewritten brief, on the printed papers already on file in this court and on typewritten copies of the additional papers. Appellants are directed to file two typewritten copies of the additional papers and five typewritten copies of their brief and to serve one copy of such record and brief on the attorney for the respondent. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ.; Carswell, J., not voting. [See 283 App. Div. 670.]
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No: II-07-038                                                          July 31, 2007CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416       E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING IN WILMINGTON ON AUGUST 2TO DISCUSS REGULATORY PERFORMANCE AT GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUELS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting in Wilmington, N. C.,  on Thursday, August 2, with officials of Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas, L.L.C., for a review ofregulatory safety performance at the company’s low-enriched uranium fuel fabrication facility.

The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. (EDT) in the Masonboro Island Room of the StudentCenter at the University of North Carolina Wilmington, located at 601 South College Road. Thepurpose of the meeting will be to discuss the results of the NRC’s latest Licensee Performance Reviewat the plant for a period from May 8, 2005 through August 2, 2007.

The NRC staff said in letters to the company earlier this month that Global Nuclear Fuelscontinued to conduct its activities related to Safety Operations, Radiological Controls, NuclearMaterials Safeguards, Facility Support and Licensing in a safe and secure manner but that one areaneeding improvement was identified. The letter said that, while performance in the area of FacilitySupport was adequate, the company needed to improve on its implementation of procedures formaintenance and surveillance of safety controls to ensure they can perform their intended function. 

The meeting is between officials of the NRC and Global Fuels and is open to observation bythe public and news media representatives. NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answerquestions from reporters and interested members of the public.

Copies of the meeting announcement letter and the appraisal letter and its enclosures from theNRC to Global Nuclear Fuels are available to the public toll-free from the NRC Public DocumentRoom at 1-800-397-4209 or from the NRC’s Agencywide Document Access and Management System(ADAMS) on the internet at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. Enter ML Number071910423 for the meeting announcement and ML071870342 for the appraisal letter.  

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-3and S-8 (Nos. 333-127401, 333114413, 333-99711, 333-137168, and 333-137169) ofAvocent Corporation of our report****dated February 21,2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K.

 
| /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP    |
| Birmingham, Alabama            |
| February 21, 2008         |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-56646, 333-53648 and 333-48572) of Tvia, Inc. of
our report dated May 7, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated May 7, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
June 26, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 67187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24965]



[[Page 67187]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Office of Polar Programs; Comprehensive Environmental Evaluations 
for Antarctic Activities

AGENCY: National Science Foundation (NSF).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: National Science Foundation gives notice of the availability 
of a Final Environmental Impact Statement/Comprehensive Environmental 
Evaluation (FEIS/FCEE) for activities proposed to be undertaken in 
Antarctica.

DATES: The waiting period ends January 18, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Dr. Polly A. Penhale, Office of Polar Programs, Room 755, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea9a9a8f84828b868faa84998cc48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6a6a6b3b8beb7bab396b8a5b0f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Polly A. Penhale, Environmental 
Officer, Office of Polar Programs, (703) 292-8033, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80f0f0e5eee8e1ece5c0eef3e6aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85f5f5e0ebede4e9e0c5ebf6e3abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 3 of Annex I to the Protocol on 
Environmental Protection of the Antarctic Treaty requires the 
preparation of an EIS/CEE for anyproposed Antarctic activity likely to 
have more than a minor or transitory impact. The DraftEIS/CEE for 
Project IceCube was made publicly available and comments were accepted 
during a90-day comment period, as specified in 45 CFR 641.18(c). The 
Final EIS/CEE containingcomments received on the Draft EIS/CEE and 
responses to these comments, is now publiclyavailable and has been 
circulated to all Parties to the Protocol and parties that commented on 
theDraft EIS/CEE. This notice is published pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 2403a.
    The National Science Foundation has submitted this Final EIS/CEE, 
for the operation ofa high-energy neutrino telescope (Project IceCube) 
at the South Pole. The document is availableon the Internet at http://www.nsf.gov/od/opp/antarct/treaty/cees/icecube/icecube_final_cee.pdf.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-24965 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018189EN.01001901.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/19 |

---

DECISION No 58/2017 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 5 June 2018

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2018/1054]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Bodies indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington DC, on 30 May 2018

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels, on 5 June 2018

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | IMST GmbH | | Prüfzentrum | | Carl-Friedrich-Gauss-Strasse 2-4 | | 47475 Kamp-Lintfort | | GERMANY | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | Laird Bochum GmbH | | Meesmanstrasse 103 | | 44807 Bochum | | GERMANY | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | TÜV SÜD Product Service GmbH | | Äussere Frühlingsstrasse 45 | | 94315 Straubing | | GERMANY | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | TÜV Rheinland LGA Products GmbH | | Tillystrasse 2 | | 90431 Nürnberg | | GERMANY | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | UL International Germany GmbH | | Hedelfinger Strasse 61 | | 70327 Stuttgart | | GERMANY | |

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | Nemko GmbH & Co. KG | | Reetzstrasse 58 | | 76327 Pfinztal | | GERMANY | |

---
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20559

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ZAMORA

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:89-CR-232-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Zamora, federal prisoner # 49902-079, appeals the district court’s

denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence, which was

imposed following his 1990 convictions on multiple counts related to the

distribution of cocaine and marijuana. Zamora argues that the subsequent

amendment of certain sections of the United States Sentencing Guidelines

should result in a reduction of his sentence. He asserts that some of these

amendments were “clarifying” amendments, which can be applied retroactively

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 24, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20559

2

regardless of whether the Guidelines specifically designate the amendment as

retroactive.

Pursuant to § 3582(c)(2), a defendant may have his sentence modified if

he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment based upon a sentencing range that

subsequently was lowered by the Sentencing Commission. The district court

may grant a reduction if consistent with the applicable policy statements issued

by the Sentencing Commission. § 3582(c)(2). The Sentencing Commission has

stated in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 that unless an amendment is listed in § 1B1.10(c),

a reduction based on the amendment under § 3582(c) is not consistent with the

policy statement of § 1B1.10. See § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1(A)). We review a

district court’s refusal to lower a defendant’s sentence under § 3582(c)(2) for

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Drath, 89 F.3d 216, 217-18 (5th Cir.

1996).

Although Zamora argues that certain guidelines sections have been

amended, he has not specified which amendments he is referring to or shown

that these amendments apply retroactively. In addition, we have held that,

except on direct appeal, a clarifying amendment is not retroactively applied

unless the amendment is listed in § 1B1.10(c). See Drath, 89 F.3d at 217.

Finally, Zamora has not shown that the district court was required to provide

additional reasons to explain its denial of his motion. Accordingly, the district

court did not abuse its discretion in denying Zamora’s § 3582(c)(2) motion. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amendment to annual report of I-trax,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Shannon W. Farrington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Shannon W. Farrington
--------------------------
Shannon W. Farrington
Chief Financial Officer

June 2, 2004
§ 334.105 Obligated service requirement. ( a ) A Federal employee assigned under this part must agree, as a condition of accepting an assignment, to serve with the Federal Government upon completion of the assignment for a period equal to the length of the assignment.
( b ) If the employee fails to carry out this agreement, he or she must reimburse the Federal agency for its share of the costs of the assignment (exclusive of salary and benefits). The head of the Federal agency, or his or her designee, may waive this reimbursement for good and sufficient reason.
### §70903. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the FFA and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the constitution or bylaws of the FFA.

(b) Voting.—In matters of official business of a local chapter, each member has one vote. In matters of official business of a State association, each qualified delegate of a local chapter has one vote.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1356; Pub. L. 116–7, §4, Feb. 21, 2019, 133 Stat. 479.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70903 | 36:276. | Aug. 30, 1950, ch. 823, §6, 64 Stat. 565. |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "In matters of" are substituted for "In the conduct of" for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–7 substituted "FFA" for "corporation" and "as provided in the constitution or bylaws of the FFA" for "as provided in the bylaws" before period at end.
#### § 553.101 Applicability.

This part applies to employment of civilian annuitants who would be subject to termination of annuity or annuity offset under 5 U.S.C. 8344 or 5 U.S.C. 8468. Agencies may request exceptions as provided in subpart B of this part from the reemployed annuitant provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8344 (for Civil Service Retirement System annuitants) or 8468 (for Federal Employees' Retirement System annuitants), as appropriate.

[65 FR 19644, Apr. 12, 2000]
No. I-08-034 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

May 15, 2008

NEW NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

 TO HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Blake Welling as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the 

Hope Creek nuclear power plant in Hancock’s Bridge, N.J. 

 Welling joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in the Region I 

Office in June 1995. Most recently, he was a senior project engineer in 

the Regional Division of Reactor Projects. He also has worked as a resident inspector at 

Limerick Generating Station in Limerick, Pa., and the Peach Bottom Atomic Power 

Station in Delta, Pa., and as a reactor inspector in the Division of Reactor Safety. 

 Prior to joining the agency, Welling worked as a nuclear safety assessor for the 

United States Department of Energy. He also served as a submarine officer in the nuclear 

power program of the U. S. Navy. He received a Bachelor’s degree in mechanical 

engineering from the U. S. Naval Academy. 

ABlake has the experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry 

out its mission of protecting people and the environment and ensuring the safe operation 

of nuclear power plants. He’s an excellent addition to our inspection team at Hope 

Creek," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, 

monitoring major work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Hope Creek resident inspectors can be reached at 856-935-5373. 

 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov