alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2305. Staff

(a) Establishment of the Museum Director as Chief Executive Officer.—There shall be a director of the Museum (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the "Director") who shall serve as chief executive officer of the Museum and exercise day-to-day authority for the Museum. The Director shall be appointed by the Chairperson of the Council, subject to confirmation of the Council. The Director may be paid with nonappropriated funds, and, if paid with appropriated funds shall be paid the rate of basic pay for positions at level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5. The Director shall report to the Council and its Executive Committee through the Chairperson. The Director shall serve at the pleasure of the Council.

(b) Appointment of Employees.—The Director shall have authority to—

(1) appoint employees in the competitive service subject to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, relating to classification and general schedule pay rates;

(2) appoint and fix the compensation (at a rate not to exceed the rate of basic pay in effect for positions at level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5) of up to three employees notwithstanding any other provision of law; and

(3) implement the decisions and strategic plan for the Museum, as approved by the Council, and perform such other functions as may be assigned from time-to-time by the Council, the Executive Committee of the Council, or the Chairperson of the Council, consistent with this legislation.

(Added Pub. L. 106–292, §1, Oct. 12, 2000, 114 Stat. 1032.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2305, Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1278, related to the establishment of the memorial museum, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 106–292.
MOLDOVA PUBLISHES TELECOM DECREE

----

**December 1997/January 1998**
by Valenntina David 
The final version of the Moldovan Government's plan to privatize Moldtelecom, the country'sstate telecommunications monopoly, has been published in the government's official gazette.  Theplan involves a two-part tender process intended to ensure that only internationaltelecommunications operators which can contribute the required financial resources and technicaland commercial expertise are admitted as potential bidders.  The entire process is intended to betransparent, with offers to be evaluated according to clear, pre-established rules.
The tender will be conducted in two phases.  In phase one, potential investors will be invited toestablish their credentials as telecommunications operators by demonstrating:
- network development and operational experience; the ability to install international-standard information management and accountingsystems;
adequate financial resources;
the ability to protect Moldtelecom's international telecommunications revenues; and
 technical expertise and commercial success.
During this phase, potential investors will be required to make indicative bids and present so-called "preliminary documentation," including a draft corporate charter and founding agreement.The indicative bids of the short-listed bidders will be published at the end of phase one.  
The Moldovan Government will use a weighted scoring system to evaluate bids received in phaseone.  The indicative price offered will account for 50 points out of a possible 100, with the highestprice offer receiving 50 points.  Credentials such as professional qualifications and proficiency willaccount for a maximum of 30 points.  The bidder's proposed business plan, including itswillingness to transfer operational and commercial know-how and its program for developinghuman resources and maintaining employment, will account for 20 points.
A short list of bidders will be invited to take part in the second and final phase of the tender. During this phase, qualified bidders will be invited to make final and binding bids, based on theirfinal documentation.  The winner will be selected on the basis of the highest price bid and the finalbusiness plan.  A maximum of 90 points out of a possible 100 will be awarded for the final priceoffered, and a maximum of 10 points will be awarded for the bidder's proposed business plan.
In the event that an adequate distinction cannot be made between two final bids, the MoldovanGovernment reserves the right to negotiate simultaneously with two bidders or bidding groups.The final decision will be made by the Government of Moldova, which reserves the right not toaccept any final bid in the event that none proves satisfactory. *For more information on theMoldtelecom privatization tender, visit BISNIS Online atwww.mac.doc.gov/bisnis/isa/971024md.htm.
Valenntina David is with the American Embassy in Chisinau.
***This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the NewlyIndependent States (BISNIS)****
### §151707. Provision and acceptance of support by Librarian of Congress

(a) Provision by Librarian.—(1) The Librarian of Congress may provide personnel, facilities, and other administrative services to the corporation. Administrative services may include reimbursement of expenses under section 151703(f) of this title, at rates not exceeding the applicable per diem rates for the United States Government.

(2) The corporation shall reimburse the Librarian for support provided under paragraph (1) of this subsection. Amounts reimbursed shall be deposited in the Treasury to the credit of the appropriations then current and chargeable for the cost of providing the support.

(b) Acceptance by Librarian.—The Librarian may accept, without regard to chapters 33 and 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5 and related regulations, the services of the corporation and its directors, officers, and employees as volunteers in performing functions authorized under this chapter, without compensation from the Library of Congress.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1406.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151707(a) | 36:5704. | Oct. 11, 1996, Pub. L. 104–285, title II, §§205, 206, 110 Stat. 3385. |
| 151707(b) | 36:5705. | |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "chapters 33 and 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5 and related regulations" are substituted for "the civil service classification laws, rules, or regulations" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
# L_2022246EN.01009601.xml

| 22.9.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 246/96

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 139/2022

of 29 April 2022

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2022/1583]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2006 of 16 November 2021 laying down implementing technical standards amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1800 as regards the allocation of credit assessments of external credit assessment institutions to an objective scale of credit quality steps in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2006 of 16 November 2021 laying down implementing technical standards amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1800 as regards the allocation of credit assessments of external credit assessment institutions to an objective scale of credit quality steps in accordance with Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1w (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1800) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32021 R 2006: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2006 of 16 November 2021 (OJ L 407, 17.11.2021, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32021 R 2006: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2006 of 16 November 2021 (OJ L 407, 17.11.2021, p. 18).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2006 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 April 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Nicolas VON LINGEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 407, 17.11.2021, p. 18.

1

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*

---
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster
Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2011



/s/ James C. SmithJames C. Smith
President (Principal Executive
Officer)


Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification
is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1948

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU 

4 YAMADA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Shigeru Yamada shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 
2

•HR 1948 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Shigeru Yamada 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3

•HR 1948 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Shigeru Yamada shall 

2 not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 

3 privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act.

Æ
#### Meyer Haberkorn et al., Appellants, v. New York Telephone Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PAUL TILLAGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:08-cr-00458-REP-RCY-1)

Submitted: January 29, 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Tillage, Appellant Pro Se. Heather L. Hart, Stephen Wiley 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Erik Sean Siebert, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Paul Tillage seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Tillage has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Thomas M. Losie, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders of Ken-Vic, Inc., Appellant, v. Ken-Vic, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Hilliard Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

All concur.
### §41507. National Gang Intelligence Center

#### (a) Establishment

The Attorney General shall establish a National Gang Intelligence Center and gang information database to be housed at and administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to collect, analyze, and disseminate gang activity information from—

(1) the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

(2) the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives;

(3) the Drug Enforcement Administration;

(4) the Bureau of Prisons;

(5) the United States Marshals Service;

(6) the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security of the Department of Homeland Security;

(7) the Department of Housing and Urban Development;

(8) the Office of Justice Services of the Bureau of Indian Affairs;

(9) tribal, State, and local law enforcement;

(10) Federal, tribal, State, and local prosecutors;

(11) Federal, tribal, State, and local probation and parole offices;

(12) Federal, tribal, State, and local prisons and jails; and

(13) any other entity as appropriate.

#### (b) Information

The Center established under subsection (a) shall make available the information referred to in subsection (a) to—

(1) Federal, tribal, State, and local law enforcement agencies;

(2) Federal, tribal, State, and local corrections agencies and penal institutions;

(3) Federal, tribal, State, and local prosecutorial agencies; and

(4) any other entity as appropriate.

#### (c) Annual report

The Center established under subsection (a) shall annually submit to Congress a report on gang activity.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2006 and for each fiscal year thereafter.

(Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1107, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3093; Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §251(a), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 534 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a)(8). Pub. L. 111–211, §251(a)(1)(A), (B), added par. (8) and redesignated former par. (8) as (9).

Subsec. (a)(9). Pub. L. 111–211, §251(a)(1)(A), (C), redesignated par. (8) as (9) and substituted "tribal, State," for "State". Former par. (9) redesignated (10).

Subsec. (a)(10) to (12). Pub. L. 111–211, §251(a)(1)(A), (D), redesignated pars. (9) to (11) as (10) to (12), respectively, and inserted "tribal," before "State," wherever appearing. Former par. (12) redesignated (13).

Subsec. (a)(13). Pub. L. 111–211, §251(a)(1)(A), redesignated par. (12) as (13).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–211, §251(a)(2), inserted "tribal," before "State," wherever appearing.
### §152705. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1419.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152705(a) | 36:1506. | Dec. 2, 1980, Pub. L. 96–489, §§6, 7, 94 Stat. 2553. |
| 152705(b) | 36:1507. | |

Section

The words "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States where incorporated" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 919.905 Affiliate. Persons are *affiliates* of each other if, directly or indirectly, either one controls or has the power to control the other or a third person controls or has the power to control both. The ways we use to determine control include, but are not limited to— ( a ) Interlocking management or ownership;
( b ) Identity of interests among family members;
( c ) Shared facilities and equipment;
( d ) Common use of employees; or
( e ) A business entity which has been organized following the exclusion of a person which has the same or similar management, ownership, or principal employees as the excluded person.
1997 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-3-1997

Deane v. Pocono Med Ctr

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket

96-7174

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1997 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Deane v. Pocono Med Ctr" (1997). 1997 Decisions. Paper 237.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1997/237
Filed October 3, 1997

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 96-7174

STACY L. DEANE,

 Appellant

v.

POCONO MEDICAL CENTER

(D.C. Civil Action No. 94-1139)

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON,

MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD,

ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, Circuit Judges, and

BARRY, District Judge*

ORDER

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing

en banc in the above appeal, it is

O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the

opinion filed August 25, 1997 and list the above case for

rehearing en banc at the convenience of the court.

 By the Court,

 /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter

 Chief Judge

Dated: October 3, 1997

_________________________________________________________________

*Hon. Maryanne Trump Barry, United States District Court for the

District of New Jersey, sitting by designation, as to panel rehearing 

only.

A True Copy:

Teste:

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals

 for the Third Circuit
### §11190. Issuance of rules

The Administrator shall issue rules to carry out this subchapter, including rules that establish procedures and methods for making grants and contracts, and distributing funds available, to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §299I, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12219, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1893.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5680 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first fiscal year that begins after Nov. 2, 2002, and applicable only with respect to fiscal years beginning on or after the first day of the first fiscal year that begins after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 12223 of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as an Effective Date of 2002 Amendment note under section 11101 of this title.