alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC DIRECTS STAFF TO INITIATE RULEMAKING 

ON DEPLETED URANIUM DISPOSAL 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has directed the agency staff to draft amendments 

to regulations regarding low-level radioactive waste to accommodate disposal of large amounts 

of depleted uranium. 

 In a Staff Requirements Memorandum issued March 18, the Commission accepted the 

staff’s recommendation that the agency continue to consider depleted uranium as Class A lowlevel waste, but amend regulations in 10 CFR Part 61 to require a site-specific analysis for the 

disposal of large quantities of depleted uranium and the technical requirements for such an 

analysis. The Commission also directed the staff to develop a guidance document for public 

comment that outlines the parameters and assumptions to be used in conducting the site-specific 

analyses. 

 The Commission stressed that the rulemaking was not intended to change the current 

classification of depleted uranium as Class A waste. “Eventual changes to waste classification 

designations in the regulations must be analyzed in light of the total amount of depleted uranium 

being disposed of at any given site,” the Commission said in its memorandum. 

 The Commission noted, however, that for “significant amounts of depleted uranium, 

there may be a need to place additional restrictions on the disposal of the depleted uranium at a 

specific site or deny such disposal based on unique site characteristics.” Those restrictions would 

be identified through the site-specific analysis, it said. 

 The Commission also directed the staff to conduct a public workshop with “all 

potentially affected stakeholders” to discuss issues associated with the disposal of depleted 

uranium, the potential issues to be considered in rulemaking, and technical parameters of 

concern in the analysis so that informed decisions can be made in the interim period until the 

regulatory changes are final. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-052 March 18, 2009
Depleted uranium is the byproduct, or tails, of the uranium enrichment process, a key 

point in the production of fuel for nuclear power reactors. The staff proposal (SECY-08-147) 

fulfilled an earlier Commission directive in the adjudicatory proceeding regarding Louisiana 

Energy Services’ application for a license to construct and operate a gas centrifuge enrichment 

plant in New Mexico. That license was granted in June 2006, and the plant is now under 

construction. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 792.203 Child care subsidy programs; eligibility. ( a ) ( 1 ) An Executive agency may establish a child care subsidy program in which the agency uses appropriated funds, in accordance with this subpart, to assist lower-income employees of the agency with their child care costs. The assistance may be provided for both full-time and part-time child care, and may include before-and-after-school programs and daytime summer programs.
( 2 ) Two or more agencies may pool their funds to establish a child care subsidy program for the benefit of employees who are served by a Federally-sponsored child care center in a multi-tenant facility.
( 3 ) ( i ) Except as provided under paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section, an agency may impose restrictions on the use of appropriated funds for its child care subsidy program based on consideration of employees' needs, its own staffing needs, the local availability of child care, and other factors as determined by the agency. For example, an agency may decide to restrict eligibility for subsidies to— ( A ) Full-time permanent employees;
( B ) Employees using an agency on-site child care center;
( C ) Employees using full-time child care; or
( D ) Employees using child care in specific locations.
( ii ) An agency may not limit the payment of subsidies to accredited child care providers.
( b ) Subject to any restrictions applicable under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, an employee who qualifies as a lower-income employee under the agency's child care subsidy program is eligible to receive a child care subsidy for the care of each child under age 13 or, in the case of a disabled child, under age 18.
STATE OF MARYLAND * In the

* Court of Appeals v. * of Maryland
* No. 52 TYSHON LETEEK JONES * September Term, 2015
ORDER The case having been argued before this Court on January 12, 2016, it is this 20th day of May, 2016,
ORDERED , by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that supplemental briefing and reargument be scheduled on the following additional issue set forth below:

1. In deciding this case, should the Court re-consider its holding in Roary v. State, 385 Md.217, 226-36, 867 A.2d 1095, 1100-6 (2005), as to whether first-degree assault may serve as a predicate for second-degree felony murder?
ORDERED , that the petitioner’s supplemental brief shall be filed on or before July
5 , 2016, and the respondent’s supplemental brief shall be filed on or before August 4, 2016, and it is further
ORDERED , that the case shall be set for reargument September 9, 2016.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbara Chief Judge
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN LAMSON        
|                     |  |  |  | John Lamson            
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
### Part A—DNA Identification
§ 890.1044 Entities notified of OPM-issued debarments and suspensions. When OPM debars or suspends a provider under this subpart, OPM shall notify: ( a ) All FEHBP carriers;
( b ) The General Services Administration, for publication in the comprehensive Governmentwide list of Federal agency exclusions;
( c ) Other Federal agencies that administer health care or health benefits programs; and
( d ) State and local agencies, authorities, boards, or other organizations with health care licensing or certification responsibilities.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2003-16505; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-89] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Cherokee, IA.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2525.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 12, 2003 (68 FR                           ( print page 5463)                        69305). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 23, 2004.

Paul J. Sheridan,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.

[FR Doc. 04-2515  Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. I-09-042 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

October 15, 2009 

Email: OPA1.RESOURCE@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., 

have selected Adam Ziedonis as the new resident inspector at the Peach 

Bottom Atomic Power Station in Delta, Pa. 

 He joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Fred Bower at the twounit site, which is operated by Exelon Nuclear. 

 Ziedonis joined the agency’s Region I office in 2004 after earning bachelor’s and 

master’s degrees in mechanical engineering from Drexel University in Philadelphia. He is a 

graduate of the NRC’s Nuclear Safety Professional Development Program, a two-year training 

program that provides specialized training in nuclear safety and a broad perspective of NRC 

regulatory activities. Ziedonis also completed a rigorous NRC inspector qualification program. 

Most recently, he was assigned as a reactor inspector in the Region I Division of Reactor Safety, 

performing engineering inspections. 

 “Adam Ziedonis has the training and commitment to safety that will help the NRC carry 

out its mission of protecting people and the environment, and ensure the safe operation of Peach 

Bottom,” said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. Resident Inspectors can be assigned to 

any one site for up to seven years. 

 The Peach Bottom resident inspectors can be reached at 717/456-7614. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
### [SUBCHAPTER VI—TRANSFERRED]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Former subchapter VI of this chapter, other than section 3771, was transferred to subchapter VI of chapter 20 of this title and inserted after section 2043 of this title, and sections 3772 to 3775 were renumbered sections 2051 to 2054 of this title, respectively, by Pub. L. 107–95, §5(d)(1), Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 918.
```
**July 1995**
INVESTMENT: TAKING THE FIRST STEPS
by Bill Raisner

How should U.S. firms take advantage of agribusiness opportunities in Southern
Russia?  Careful research, followed by the development of a comprehensive market
strategy is essential.  The unfamiliarity of Russian food enterprises with free-
market production techniques, the slow pace of agricultural reform efforts and a
lack of domestic financing sources typically require foreign companies to develop a
wide range of commercial relationships in Southern Russia that are uncommon in
Western markets.  According to John Balis, director of an agribusiness partnership
program managed by the Citizen's Network for Foreign Affairs (CNFA),  U.S.
companies should be prepared "to work the whole system."  This implies the
development of formal or informal business relationships with the full spectrum of
enterprises on which a project depends--including food processing enterprises,
storage facilities, and distribution networks as well as farms.  In Balis' view, those
foreign companies most successful in Southern Russia have developed a "vertically
integrated system to get quality product."

In some cases, U.S. Government programs can help along the way.  The U.S.
Agency for International Development (USAID) provided funding for the
agribusiness partnership program operated by CNFA (above), which awards grants
to U.S. companies for training and technical assistance in connection with
agribusiness ventures.  USAID also provided funding for Farmer-to-Famer Programs
in Southern Russia managed by Volunteers in Overseas Cooperative Assistance
(VOCA) and Tri Valley Growers which can assist U.S. companies in finding
appropriate partners.  Moreover, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Agribusiness Linkage Program and the Peace Corps are able to utilize local
information sources to assist U.S. companies in establishing partnerships with
Russian enterprises.  Finally, the American Business Center in Volgograd sponsored
by the U.S. Department of Commerce can assist U.S. businesses with a wide
range of services including access to office equipment, translators and consulting
services. 

In the area of project finance, USAID has established the U.S.-Russia Investment
Fund which provides equity and loans for Russian enterprises and joint ventures. 
The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) is also in the process of
establishing an investment fund devoted specifically to U.S. agribusiness projects
in Russia and other states of the former Soviet Union.

For more information on these and other programs relating to agribusiness
opportunities in Southern Russia, contact the BISNIS Flashfax at (202) 482-3145
and order document #s 6577 and 6876.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

In connection with Catuity, Inc. (the "Company") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H. Lowry, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Reports fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: March 5, 2004
                                  /s/ John H. Lowry
                                  -----------------
                                  John H. Lowry


                                       2
§ 591.404 Method of payment. ( a ) Separate maintenance allowance rates are paid from the employee's date of arrival at Johnston Island to the employee's date of departure from Johnston Island. No deductions are necessary for details away from Johnston Island or for partial days. The separate maintenance allowance shall be computed and paid at daily rates as follows: ( 1 ) Divide the annual rate of payment by the number of days in the applicable calendar year to obtain a daily rate (counting one half-cent and over as a whole cent);
( 2 ) Multiply the daily rate by 14 to obtain a biweekly rate; and
( 3 ) Multiply the daily rate by the number of days involved to obtain the rate for any period.
( b ) A separate maintenance allowance is not part of an employee's rate of basic pay for any purpose.
( c ) The rate for any pay period shall be computed at the daily rate applicable on the first day of that pay period.
§ 838.807 Cost must be paid by annuity reduction. ( a ) A court order awarding a former spouse survivor annuity is not a court order acceptable for processing unless it permits OPM to collect the annuity reduction required by 5 U.S.C. 8339(j)(4) or 8419 from annuity paid by OPM to a retiree. OPM will not honor a court order that provides for the retiree or former spouse to pay OPM the amount of the annuity reduction by any other means.
( b ) The amount of the annuity reduction required by section 8339(j)(4) or section 8419 of title 5, United States Code, may be paid— ( 1 ) By reduction of the former spouse's entitlement under a court order acceptable for processing that is directed at employee annuity payable to a retiree;
( 2 ) By reduction of the employee annuity payable to a retiree; or
( 3 ) By actuarial reduction of the former spouse survivor annuity in the event the reduction of the employee annuity is not made for any reason prior to the death of the annuitant.
( c ) Unless the court order otherwise directs, OPM will collect the annuity reduction required by 5 U.S.C. 8339(j)(4) or 8419 from the employee annuity payable to a retiree.
[57 FR 33574, July 29, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 46631, Aug. 8, 2014]
# L_2014214EN.01000101.xml

| 19.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 214/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime

The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (1) will enter into force on 3 April 2014.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 89, 25.3.2014, p. 7.

1

---
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fibria Celulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)            the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli |                       |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   | Name:                          | Marcelo Strufaldi Castelli |   |
|   | Title:                         | Chief Executive Officer    |   |

 

Dated: February 29, 2012

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
U

. S

. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENE RGY CONSERVATION STANDARD S

FRAMEWORK FOR CEILING FANS AND CEILING FAN LIGHT KITS

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20 585

Tues day

, March 2 2 , 201 3

Room 8E

- 089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy

conservation standard s framework . DOE will explain its plans for the analytical approach and

scope of coverage for the rulemaking. DOE will also seek comment on the rulemaking, including

planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources. DOE also plans to conduct test procedure

rulemakings for these products. DOE will present a preliminary discussion of key issues for the

test procedures and seeks feedback.

Agend a

9:00 am

- 9 : 55 am Welcome ; Introductions

, Agenda Review

, and Opening

Remarks; Regulatory History and Rulemaking Overview;

Scope of Coverage and Definitions

Lucy d e B utts , DOE Project Manager

9: 55 am

- 1 0: 4 0 am Test Procedures and Metrics

Colleen Kantner

, Karina Garbesi, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

1 0 : 4 0 am

- 1 0 : 5 5 am Break

10 : 5 5 am

- 1 1 : 20 a m Market & Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis

Colleen Kantner, Karina Garbesi, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

11:20 am

- 11:45 a m Engineering Analysis

Aris Marantan, Navigant Consulting, Inc.

1 1 : 45 am

- 1 2 : 45 pm Lunch

1 2 : 45 pm

- 1 : 30 pm Markups and Energy Use Analysis; Life

- Cycle Cost and

Payback Period Analysis ; Shipments Analysis and National

Impacts Analys i s

Colleen Kantner, Lawr ence Berkeley National Laboratory

1 : 30 pm

- 1 : 40 pm Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Hayden Cook

, Navigant Consulting, Inc.

1:40 pm

- 1 : 50 pm NOPR Analyses

Colleen Kantner, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

1 : 50 pm

- 2 : 00 pm Closing Remarks

Lucy deButts, DOE Project Manager