alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §151907. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in New York, New York, or another place decided by the board of directors. However, the activities of the corporation are not confined to the place where the principal office is located but may be conducted throughout the States, territories, and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1409.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151907 | 36:605(a). | Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1036, §5(a), 68 Stat. 893. |

Section

The word "various" is omitted as unnecessary.
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fibria Celulose S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guilherme Perboyre Cavalcanti, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Guilherme Perboyre Cavalcanti                               |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name Guilherme Perboyre Cavalcanti                              |   |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer and   Investor Relations Officer |   |

 

Dated: February 28, 2013

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### § 5801.101 General.

In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to members and other employees of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. In addition to the standards in 5 CFR part 2635 and this part, members and other employees are subject to the executive branch financial disclosure regulations contained in 5 CFR part 2634 and to additional regulations regarding their conduct contained in 10 CFR part 0.
#### § 591.301 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the regulations required by section 5942 of title 5, United States Code, for the payment of an allowance based on duty at remote worksites.
### §220308. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a trustee, officer, or member as such during the life of the corporation or on its dissolution or final liquidation. This subsection does not prevent the payment of reasonable compensation to an officer or employee or reimbursement for actual expenses in amounts approved by the board of trustees.

(c) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan or advance to a trustee, officer, or employee. Trustees who vote for or assent to making a loan or advance to a trustee, officer, or employee, and officers who participate in making the loan or advance, are jointly and severally liable to the corporation for the amount of the loan or advance until it is repaid.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1464.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 220308(a) | 36:1211. | Oct. 20, 1978, Pub. L. 95–493, §§9, 11, 92 Stat. 1646. |
| 220308(b) | 36:1209(a). | |
| 220308(c) | 36:1209(b). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title. The words "This subsection does not prevent" are substituted for "Nothing in this subsection, however, shall be construed to prevent" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (c), the words "or advance" are added the first time they appear for consistency in the subsection. The word "Trustees" is substituted for "Any director", and the word "trustee" is substituted for "director", for clarity and consistency in the revised chapter.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adherex Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), each of the undersigned, William P. Peters, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James A. Klein, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 10, 2007



By:

/s/ William P. PetersWilliam P. PetersChairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 10, 2007



By:

/s/ James A. Klein, Jr.James A. Klein, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER V—INCENTIVE GRANTS FOR LOCAL DELINQUENCY PREVENTION PROGRAMS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Title V of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, comprising this subchapter, was originally added to Pub. L. 93–415 by Pub. L. 102–586, §5(a), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5027, and amended by Pub. L. 105–277, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681. Title V is shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12222(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1894, without reference to the intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of the title's provisions by Pub. L. 107–273.

Another title V of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93–415, title V, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1133, enacted chapter 319 and sections 5038 to 5042 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and former sections 3772 to 3774 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and amended sections 5031 to 5038 of Title 18, former sections 3701 and 3768 of Title 42, and sections 10123 and 10133 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §307, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5152. For complete classification of that title V to the Code, see Tables.
BCD 1996-60 BA 2129
§ 842.706 Computation of alternative form of annuity. ( a ) To compute the beginning rate of annuity payable to a retiree who elects an alternative form of annuity, OPM will first compute the monthly rate of annuity (and annuity supplement, if any), otherwise payable under subchapter II of chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, including all reductions provided under the subchapter other than those in section 8420a of that title. That monthly rate is then reduced by an amount equal to the retiree's lump-sum credit, excluding interest, divided by the applicable present value factor for the retiree's attained age (in full years) at the time of retirement. The reduced monthly rate is then rounded to the next lowest dollar and becomes the rate of annuity payable.
( b ) OPM will publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing any proposed adjustments in present value factors at least 30 days before the effective date of the adjustments.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2128

To amend chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code, to allow members 

of the Armed Forces to sue the United States for damages for certain 

injuries caused by improper medical care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2003

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, and Mr. 

GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code, 

to allow members of the Armed Forces to sue the United 

States for damages for certain injuries caused by improper medical care.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLAIMS FOR IMPROPER MEDICAL CARE. 

4 (a) COGNIZABLE CLAIMS.—Chapter 171 of title 28, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new section: 
2

•HR 2128 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 2681. Certain claims by members of the Armed 

2 Forces 

3 ‘‘(a) CLAIMS OF MEMBERS OF ARMED FORCES.—

4 Subject to all the provisions of this chapter, claims may 

5 be brought under this chapter for damages against the 

6 United States for personal injury or death of a member 

7 of the Armed Forces serving on active duty or on full8 time National Guard duty (as defined in section 101(42) 

9 of title 10), under the conditions prescribed in this section. 

10 ‘‘(b) WHERE CARE PERFORMED.—The personal in11 jury or death referred to in subsection (a) must have aris12 en out of medical or dental care furnished the member 

13 of the Armed Forces in a fixed medical treatment facility 

14 operated by the Secretary of a military department or any 

15 other fixed medical facility operated by the United States. 

16 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, a 

17 fixed medical facility is a medical center, hospital, or clinic 

18 that is located in a building, structure, or other improve19 ment to real property. 

20 ‘‘(d) REDUCTION OF CLAIMS BY OTHER BENE21 FITS.—The payment of any claim of a member of the 

22 Armed Forces under this section shall be reduced by the 

23 present value of other benefits received by the member and 

24 the member’s estate, survivors, and beneficiaries, under 

25 title 10, title 37, or title 38 that are attributable to the 

26 physical injury or death from which the claim arose.’’. 
3

•HR 2128 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for chapter 171 of title 28, United States Code, is amend3 ed by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘2681. Certain claims by members of the Armed Forces.’’.

4 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 Section 2681 of title 28, United States Code, as 

6 added by section 1, shall apply only with respect to per7 sonal injuries or deaths occurring on or after the date of 

8 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Hillsborough,

June, 1897.

#### Fradd *v.*Charon & *Tr.,*Wallace, *Claimant.*

An assignment ol future earnings, received in good faith and for a valuable consideration, will not be invalidated by mere knowledge on the part of the assignee of the assignor’s desire to prevent an attachment by other creditors.

Foreign Attachment. Issue between the plaintiff and the claimant. The court ordered the trustee discharged, and the plaintiff excepted. Facts found by the court are stated in the opinion.

*Sullivan |f Broderick,*for the plaintiff.

*Burnham, Brown $ Warren,*for the claimant.

Clark, J.

The trustee disclosed an indebtedness to the principal defendant of $151, for the service of a team and man at four dollars per day, twenty dollars of this sum being due at the date of the service of the writ, July 25,1896, and the balance becoming due in different sums, week by week, up to September 19, 1896. The claimant seeks to hold the funds under a written assignment from the defendant, dated July 10, 1896, accepted to be paid as found due, and duly filed with the city clerk, July 11, 1896. One object of the assignment known to the claimant was the prevention of attachment by the defendant’s creditors of the sums becoming due him each week under his contract of employment; and upon this ground the plaintiff claims that the assignment was fraudulent, and that the fraud is an inference of law from the facts found by the court. No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the consideration.

The court found that “ one object of the assignment known to Wallace was to prevent attachment by Charon’s creditors of the weekly sums becoming due him under his employment by the street and park commissioners of the city.” This is not a finding that Wallace had any such motive in taking the assignment. Wallace’s purpose and object were to secure a debt due him from the defendant; and the fact that he knew the defendant had an object to prevent the attachment of his earnings by other creditors would in no way affect the validity of the assignment. As Wallace was not guilty of fraud in taking the assignment as security for his claim against the defendant, the validity of that security would not be affected by knowledge of a purpose on the *190part of the defendant in which he did not participate. *McCormick*v. *Towns,*64 N. H. 278.

The consideration for the assignment was $238.95, being the amount of a promissory note for $207.97 given by Charon to Wallace, and $30.98 due to one Cota from Charon, which Wallace was to pay at the rate of two dollars per week out of the sums collected by him. The assignment was not made for the purpose of hindering or delaying Charon’s creditors, or to secure a benefit to the assignor.

*Exception overruled.*

Parsons, J,, did not sit: the others concurred.
Exhibit 32.1

                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, the undersigned officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   March 12, 2004
                                  /s/ Linda L. Perry
                                _________________________________________
                                Linda L. Perry
                                Principal Executive and Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

y0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142758 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142758 

 COA: 292041 

Kent CC: 08-003025-FC 

MICHAEL LAVAIL WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Exhibit 13.1
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report of Adira Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (i)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 29, 2015
/s/ Gadi LevinGadi LevinChief Financial Officer(principal executive officer)
```

[House Report 107-214]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-214

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2926, AIR TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND 
                        SYSTEM STABILIZATION ACT

                                _______
                                

 September 21, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 244]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 244, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2926, the 
Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act, under a 
closed rule. The rule waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill. The rule provides one hour of debate 
in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure. Finally, the rule provides one motion to 
recommit.

                            committee votes

    Pursuant to clause 3(b) of House rule XIII the results of 
each record vote on an amendment or motion to report, together 
with the names of those voting for and against, are printed 
below:

Rules Committee record vote No. 42

    Date: September 21, 2001.
    Measure: H.R. 2926.
    Motion by: Representative Hall.
    Summary of motion: To make in order the Hastings (FL) 
amendment to make all airline and airport workers, including 
airport transit workers, as well as employees who work for 
airline suppliers eligible to receive extended unemployment, 
job training, and health benefits in the event that they lost 
their jobs as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 
11, 2001.
    Results: Defeated 4-8.
    Vote by Members: Goss--Nay; Pryce--Nay; Diaz-Balart--Nay; 
Hastings (WA)--Nay; Myrick--Nay; Sessions--Nay; Reynolds--Nay; 
Frost--Yea; Hall--Yea; Slaughter--Yea; Hastings (FL)--Yea; 
Dreier--Nay.

                                  

```
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District

of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2294

___________

James Hill, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Dave Dormire, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 24, 2007

Filed: May 30, 2007

___________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

James Hill, a Missouri inmate, appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Dave Dormire, former

superintendent at Missouri State Penitentiary (MSP). We grant Hill leave to proceed

in forma pauperis on appeal.
-2-

Hill alleged that he had been exposed to a number of dangerous environmental

conditions at MSP which had caused skin problems, stomach pain, nausea, diarrhea

and vomiting. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court

that Hill offered no evidence that any medical problem he suffered was attributable

to the alleged conditions and no evidence that Dormire was deliberately indifferent to

a substantial risk of serious harm to him or other inmates. See Choate v. Lockhart, 7

F.3d 1370, 1373-74 (8th Cir. 1993) (to establish Eighth Amendment violation,

prisoner must show that alleged condition was objectively sufficiently serious and that

prison officials’ actions subjectively demonstrated deliberate indifference to prisoner’s

health or safety). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________