alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Merrimack,

Dec., 1897.

#### State *v.*Narcarm.

On tlie trial of an indictment for a second offence of illegally keeping malt liquor for sale, the state may prove a former conviction of the defendant under another name by which he was known and called.

Indictment, against the defendant, under the name Francis Narcarm, for a second offence of illegally keeping malt liquor for sale. Facts agreed. The alleged former conviction was of the defendant under the name Ferrin Narcarm, before a police court. The only record of the conviction was the original complaint and warrant, with minutes indorsed upon the warrant by the clerk of the court, showing that the defendant pleaded guilty and was fined. The defendant’s true name is Ferrin Narcarm, but he is also .known as and called Francis Narcarm.

*238*George M. Fletcher,*solicitor, for the state.

*Albín, Martin £ Howe, Cornelius E. Clifford,*and *EanielB. Donovan,*for the defendant.

Carpenter, C. J.

The original complaint and warrant and the minutes indorsed upon the warrant were competent evidence of the former conviction. *State*v. *Cox, post, p.*246.

The defendant could take advantage of the misnomer in the indictment only by a plea in *abatement;*and to such a plea a replication that he is known as well by one name as the other would be good. 1 Ch. Cr. L. 445,451; 1 Arch. Cr. L. & PI. 261, 262, n, 267; Whar. Am. Cr. L., *ss.*536, 537; *Rex*v. *Berriman,*5 C. & P. 601; *Commonwealth*v. *Dedham,*16 Mass. 141, 147; *Turns*v. *Commonwealth,*6 Met. 224; *Commonwealth*v. *Fredericks,*119 Mass. 199; *State*v. *Thompson,*20 N. H. 250.

*Judgment, guilty.*

All concurred.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-005 January 14, 2008 

NRC ANNOUNCES EXPANDED PHOTO GALLERY ON ITS WEB SITE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has expanded the photo gallery on its Web site, 

allowing users to easily find and download high-quality photographs and other images related to 

agency activities. 

“In our efforts to strengthen public outreach, the agency has developed a photo gallery to 

help show who the NRC is and what it does” said Director of Public Affairs Eliot Brenner. “We 

expect these photos to help journalists, students, researchers and others with an interest in how 

the NRC protects people and the environment.” 

The photo gallery can be searched by key words or through a menu of categories and 

subcategories. In addition, there are guidelines for searching and printing photos as well as 

conditions for using NRC images. New photos and images will be added, along with their 

descriptions, as they become available. 

A link to the new gallery is available on the lower right side of the NRC’s homepage at 

www.nrc.gov . To go directly to the gallery, the URL is: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/photogallery/. 

 

 ###
### §30312. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be transferred to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to be applied to the care and comfort of blinded veterans.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1319.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30312 | 36:865. | Aug. 27, 1958, Pub. L. 85–769, §15, 72 Stat. 927; June 13, 1991, Pub. L. 102–54, §13(n)(4), 105 Stat. 278. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "Secretary of Veterans Affairs" are substituted for "Department of Veterans Affairs" because under 38:303 the Secretary is the head of the Department.
### §153903. Powers

The corporation may—

(1) adopt a constitution and bylaws;

(2) adopt a seal; and

(3) hold real and personal property in the United States, but only to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of the corporation and only in an amount not more than $50,000.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1431.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153903 | 36:139a. | June 15, 1936, ch. 546, §2, 49 Stat. 1506. |

Section

In clause (1), the words "not inconsistent with law" are omitted as unnecessary.
### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL EMPLOYEE MATTERS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–223, div. A, title II, §247(a)(2)(A), Sept. 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 890, inserted subchapter heading.
### §153701. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—National Woman's Relief Corps, Auxiliary to the Grand Army of the Republic (in this chapter, the "corporation"), is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Place of Incorporation and Domicile.—The corporation is declared to be incorporated and domiciled in the District of Columbia.

(c) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1428.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153701 | 36:1001. | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §§1, 2, 4(1), 76 Stat. 502, 503. |
| | 36:1002.36:1004(1). | |

Section

36:1004(1).

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary and executed words.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVoltage controlling mechanisms in low resistivity silicon solar cells:  A unified approachAn experimental technique capable of resolving the dark saturation current into its base and emitter components is used as the basis of an analysis in which the voltage limiting mechanisms were determined for a variety of high voltage, low resistivity silicon solar cells. The cells studied include the University of Florida hi-low emitter cell, the NASA and the COMSAT multi-step diffused cells, the Spire Corporation ion-implanted emitter cell, and the University of New South Wales MINMIS and MINP cells. The results proved to be, in general, at variance with prior expectations. Most surprising was the finding that the MINP and the MINMIS voltage improvements are due, to a considerable extent, to a previously unrecognized optimization of the base component of the saturation current. This result is substantiated by an independent analysis of the material used to fabricate these devices.Document ID19840012848Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsWeizer, V. G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Swartz, C. K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Hart, R. E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Godlewski, M. P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateMay 4, 1984Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83612NAS 1.15:83612Meeting InformationMeeting: Photovoltaic Specialists Conf.Location: Kissimmee, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: May 1, 1984End Date: May 4, 1984Sponsors:IEEEAccession Number84N20916Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-55-42Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840012848.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 7501.101 Purpose.

In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to employees of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD or Department) and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. Employees are required to comply with 5 CFR part 2635, this part, and any additional rules of conduct that the Department is authorized to issue.
Belknap,

June, 1899.

#### Edwards *v.*Lamb.

A physician is liable for injuries resulting from his negligent assurance that the dressing of a wound was not attended with danger ,oi infection.

Case, for negligence. The declaration alleged that the defendant, a physician and surgeon, was employed to treat the plaintiff’s husband for a wound which became an infectious sore; that the defendant knew‘the danger to the plaintiff of infection therefrom, but negligently informed her that there was no such danger, and on one occasion directed her to assist in dressing the wound; that she, in1 justifiable ignorance of the truth and relying upon his assurances, did so assist him, whereby she became infected with septic poison. The defendant demurred.

*Walter S. Peaslee, Martin £ Howe,*and *Stone g Shannon,*for the plaintiff

*William B. Fellows*and *Fdioard B. S. Sanborn,*for the defendant.

Peaslee, *J.*

The question presented is not one of breach of contract, and it is not necessary to consider how far the defend-' ant’s contractual duties extended. Nor is it necessary to decide whether, in the absence of any statement by the defendant, he would be liable. The case is one of positive action, not merely of failure to act.

The declaration alleges that the defendant informed the plaintiff that there was no danger of infection, and when he did this he voluntarily assumed certain obligations. The fact that his duty, as to her, was merely to advise and not to administer treatment, is immaterial. *Harriott*v. *Plimpton,*166 Mass. 585, 588. The situation was such that she needed the advice of a physician. This the defendant knew. He knew of her danger and negligently advised her as to it, and she was injured by following his advice. That when he advised her he assumed the obligation to use due care in so doing, is not open to doubt. *Carpenter*v. *Blake,*75 N. Y. 12, 25_

_ If the contract to attend the plaintiff’s husband were eliminated from the case, the liability would be the same. The gratuitous character of the services rendered to the plaintiff would not excuse the defendant’s failure to exercise such care as the circumstances demanded. *Peck*v. *Hutchinson,*88 Ia. 320, 327; *600
      *McNevins*v. *Lowe,*40 Ill. 209. On the other hand, if the advice to the wife is treated as a part of the performance of the contract with the husband, the defendant still owed her the non-contractual duty to use care in the performance of such of his services as concerned her personally. *Harriott*v. *Plimpton, supra.*

It is urged that there would have been no danger but for pricks in the plaintiff’s fingers, of which the defendant was ignorant. There was danger unless the plaintiff’s hands were free from the slightest wounds. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that a perfect physical condition is so common that the defendant could reasonably rely upon it in giving advice; or that the plaintiff ought, as a reasonable person, to have understood.that he was acting upon the assumption that such was the fact.'

*Demurrer overruled.*

All concurred.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–155

EMERGENCY REGARDING PROLIFERATION OF

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

MESSAGE

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

SIX MONTH PERIODIC REPORT ON THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY

WITH RESPECT TO THE PROLIFERATION OF WEAPONS OF MASS

DESTRUCTION THAT WAS DECLARED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER

12938 OF NOVEMBER 14, 1994, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1703(c)

AND 50 U.S.C. 1641(c)

DECEMBER 4, 2001.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the

Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed

(1)

To the Congress of the United States:

As required by section 204(c) of the International Emergency

Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1703(c), and section 401(c) of the

National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1641(c), I transmit herewith

a 6-month periodic report on the national emergency with respect

to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction that was declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994.

GEORGE W. BUSH.

THE WHITE HOUSE, December 4, 2001.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18
#### § 831.1703 Implementing directives.

The Director may prescribe, in the form he or she deems appropriate, such detailed procedures as are necessary to carry out the purpose of this subpart.
#### § 831.2103 Definitions.

*Employee* shall have the same meaning as in 5 U.S.C. 8331(1).

*Estimated earnings* is an estimate of basic pay for a period of military service, as determined by an authorized official of the Department of Defense the Department of Transportation, the Department of Commerce, or the Department of Health and Human Services.

*Fund* is the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund.

*Member* shall have the same meaning as in 5 U.S.C. 8331(2).

*OPM* is the Office of Personnel Management.

*Period of service* is the total years, months, and days from date of initial entry on active duty (or January 1, 1957, if that is later) to date of final discharge for enlisted military personnel, and to date of final release from active duty for officers and reservists. “Period of service” includes consecutive periods of service where there is no break in service, but does not include any lost time.

*Service* is active honorable military service performed after December 31, 1956.

*Sufficient evidence* of basic pay for service exists when the employee, Member, or survivor eligible to make a deposit for service provides copies of all official military pay documents, as identified in instructions published by OPM, which show the exact basic pay he or she received for a full period of service. If an employee, Member, or survivor does not have sufficient evidence of basic pay, he or she shall obtain a statement of estimated earnings from the appropriate branch of the military service.

*Survivor* shall have the same meaning as in 5 U.S.C. 8331(10).

[48 FR 38788, Aug. 26, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 66711, Dec. 27, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 212 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 212

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the exemption from 
     income tax for social clubs found to be practicing prohibited 
                            discrimination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Towns introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the exemption from 
     income tax for social clubs found to be practicing prohibited 
                            discrimination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF EXEMPTION FROM TAX FOR SOCIAL CLUBS PRACTICING 
              PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATION.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 501 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to prohibition of discrimination by 
certain social clubs) is amended--
            (1) by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
        sentence ``, or if, at any time during the taxable year or a 
        prior taxable year, a determination by an appropriate 
        government agency or court that such organization has a pattern 
        or practice of so discriminating against any person became 
        final'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence:
``A final determination shall cease to be taken into account under the 
first sentence after the date it is established to the satisfaction of 
the Secretary that the organization no longer engages in discrimination 
of the type involved in such determination.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 
 Kodiak Energy, Inc.
 
 We hereby consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of our Report dated March 19, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Kodiak Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009
 
 We also consent to the incorporation by reference of the above report into Kodiak Energy, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-130561 and No. 333-133452.
 
 
 /s/ MEYERS NORRIS PENNY   LLP
 
 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 Calgary, Canada
 
 April 12, 2010
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0915; Dir ID 2010-NM-020-AD
### §60533. Bureau of Prisons policy on mentoring contacts

#### (a) In general

Not later than 90 days after April 9, 2008, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall, in order to promote stability and continued assistance to offenders after release from prison, adopt and implement a policy to ensure that any person who provides mentoring services to an incarcerated offender is permitted to continue such services after that offender is released from prison. That policy shall permit the continuation of mentoring services unless the Director demonstrates that such services would be a significant security risk to the released offender, incarcerated offenders, persons who provide such services, or any other person.

#### (b) Report

Not later than September 30, 2009, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall submit to Congress a report on the extent to which the policy described in subsection (a) has been implemented and followed.

(Pub. L. 110–199, title II, §213, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 683.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 17533 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §70312. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be submitted at the same time as the report of the audit required by section 10101 of this title. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1351.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70312 | 36:2211. | Jan. 8, 1983, Pub. L. 97–427, §12, 96 Stat. 2266. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 200 of House Document No. 103–7.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Great LakesBancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Kim S. Destro, Chief Financial Officer, certify to the best of myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of      section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and,                                     |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company. |

                August 12, 2005

 

                   /s/ Kim S. Destro                                                       Kim S. Destro                Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
§ 919.315 May I use the services of an excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue to use the services of an excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction if you were using the services of that person in the transaction before the person was excluded. However, you are not required to continue using that person's services as a principal. You should make a decision about whether to discontinue that person's services only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not begin to use the services of an excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction unless the OPM grants an exception under § 919.120.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 16
- 00399
- CV
EMILY SPECKHARD , Appellant v. GLENN WILLIS , Appellee

From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 15
- 001794
- CV
- 361

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 4, 2017 , the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the $ 205 filing fee in this cause was past due and that the appeal would be dismissed if Appellant did
not either establish the right to proceed without payment of costs or pay the filing fee
within twenty

- one days of the date of the letter. On January 5, 2017, t he Clerk of this Court also notified Appellant that we have not received the docketing statement and that the appeal would be dismissed if the docketing statement was not filed within twenty

-Speckhard v. Willis Page 2

one days of the date of the letter. No response has been receive d from Appellant. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3 (b), (c).

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion de livered and filed February 22 , 2017 [CV06]