alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Second Department,

June, 1914.

#### Charles O. Niles, Appellant, *v.*Frank D. White and Ella White, His Wife, Respondents.

*Ships and shipping—unrecorded conveyance of vessel—fraud—rights of creditors—transactions with wife.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Nassau on the 19th day of February, 1913, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the Nassau Special Term.

Per Curiam:

The execution of the August bills of sale, supported by the testimony of the vendor and of the notary public who drew the instruments and took the acknowledgments, having been found as facts by the court, who saw the witnesses, will not be reversed on this record. Such unrecorded conveyances of vessels are good as between the parties. *(Moore*v. *Simonds,*100 U. S. 145.) From the testimony the court was justified in finding that since August 9, 1911, Mrs. White had hired the employees of the vessels and had managed and controlled them, and had received the earnings and profits of such management and operation. Such is the usual proof available with vessels of this kind to show possession, and warranted the trial justice in refusing to find that there had been no change of possession, as plaintiff had requested. Had Mrs. White remained in the situation bf holding only unrecorded bills of sale an execution and levy might have fastened on the vessels a lien that would have been superior. But her conveyance of March eleventh, recorded prior to the judgment, gave her a valid title that could relate back to the prior equitable appropriation of the vessels by the unrecorded bills of sale, and so rebut the inference that the recorded conveyances were executed to hinder and defraud the plaintiff. So long as our public policy recognizes the separate estate and power of the wife to deal directly with the husband such dealings between them will be subjected to suspicion and strict scrutiny, but when the facts in proof do support the *'bona fides*of the transactions they cannot be rejected merely because the secured creditor turns out to be the wife. *(Spaulding*v. *Keyes,*125 N. Y. 113; *Phillips*v. *Wooster,*36 id 412: *Schreyer*v. *Scott,*134 U. S. 405, 410.) The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
1776 I Street, NW l Suite 400 l Washington, DC l 20006-3708 l P: 202.739.8081 l F: 202.533.0182 l arp@nei.org l www.nei.org 

Anthony R. Pietrangelo 

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT 

AND CHIEF NUCLEAR OFFICER

November 20, 2009 

Mr. R. William Borchardt 

Executive Director for Operations 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Washington, DC 20555-0001 

Subject: Industry Initiative on Buried Piping Integrity 

Project Number: 689 

Dear Mr. Borchardt: 

The nuclear energy industry understands the importance of maintaining the structural capabilities of 

plant piping systems for both safety-related and non-safety-related functions. In particular, the 

integrity of buried piping systems is important to assure the public that our facilities are being 

operated in a safe and environmentally responsible manner. To this end, the industry is moving 

forward with a formal initiative to address buried piping integrity. Earlier this week, the industry’s 

chief nuclear officers voted to approve the initiative, which is attached for your information. 

The initiative is a formal commitment by the companies that operate nuclear energy facilities to 

follow a specific policy or plan of action. The Buried Piping Integrity Initiative calls for a proactive 

approach for managing potential buried piping degradation with a goal to “provide reasonable 

assurance of structural and leakage integrity of all buried piping with special emphasis on piping that 

contains radioactive materials.” 

 

We would be pleased to brief you and your staff on this industry initiative. If you have any 

questions, please contact me or Alex Marion at 202-739-8080; am@nei.org. 

Sincerely, 

Anthony R. Pietrangelo 

c: Mr. Eric J. Leeds, NRR, NRC 

 NRC Document Control Desk
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.21

Tampa Northern Railroad Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4533
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-117 September 11, 2007

NRC STAFF APPROVES TRANSFER OF

COMANCHE PEAK OPERATING LICENSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved the transfer of the operating license for the

Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station from owner TXU Generation Company LP to new owner Luminant

Generation Company LLC. As provided by NRC regulations, the staff's approval of the transfer was effective

September 10.

TXU Generation Company submitted an application April 18 requesting approval of the license

transfer. As part of Texas Energy LP’s purchase of TXU Corp., which owns TXU Generation Company, the

transfer will create an intermediate parent company, Luminant Holdco, between TXU Corp. and TXU

Generation, which will become Luminant Generation. Major issues considered by the NRC included

financial and technical qualifications, as well as the transfer and maintenance of accumulated

decommissioning funds.

A copy of the NRC's approval order and accompanying non-proprietary safety evaluation report will

be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-1

F23, Rockville, MD 20852 (telephone 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737). The non-proprietary safety

evaluation will also be available on the NRC’s Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System

(ADAMS), by entering ML072220130 at this address: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm . Help in

using ADAMS is available by calling the Public Document Room.

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail

notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §182. Abandonment of invention for unauthorized disclosure

The invention disclosed in an application for patent subject to an order made pursuant to section 181 may be held abandoned upon its being established by the Commissioner of Patents that in violation of said order the invention has been published or disclosed or that an application for a patent therefor has been filed in a foreign country by the inventor, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives, or anyone in privity with him or them, without the consent of the Commissioner of Patents. The abandonment shall be held to have occurred as of the time of violation. The consent of the Commissioner of Patents shall not be given without the concurrence of the heads of the departments and the chief officers of the agencies who caused the order to be issued. A holding of abandonment shall constitute forfeiture by the applicant, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives, or anyone in privity with him or them, of all claims against the United States based upon such invention.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 806; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(B)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §152 (Feb. 1, 1952, ch. 4, §2, 66 Stat. 4).

Language is changed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "181".

1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "Commissioner of Patents" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kim S. Destro, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Great Lakes Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial
statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision , to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

May 14, 2004



_______________________
Kim S. Destro
Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
### [§408. Renumbered §478]
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of YFC 355 Corp. (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the        Company.
/s/Anthony N.DeMint                            

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

February6, 2004
Exhibit (10)(l)(5)





Exhibit
(10)(l)(5)


 


AMENDMENT NO. 4


TO


ALLTEL CORPORATION
PROFIT-SHARING PLAN


(January 1, 2002
Restatement)


 


WHEREAS, ALLTEL Corporation (the “Company”) maintains
the ALLTEL Corporation Profit-Sharing Plan, as amended and restated effective
January 1, 2002, and as subsequently amended (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires further to amend the
Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan in
the respects hereinafter set forth.


 


1.  Effective
as of March 1, 2003, Appendix D of the Plan is amended by adding a new
subsection (h) at the end thereof to provide as follows:


 


(h)     Each person who


 


(i)            was an active employee
of Cellular XL Associates, L.P. and became an Employee on March 1, 2003;


 


(ii)           met the eligibility
requirements to become a Participant on or before the last day of the 2003 Plan
Year; and


 


(iii)          is not otherwise
eligible for an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Year
under Section 13.04;


 


shall
receive an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Year as
provided in this Appendix D.


 


2.  Effective
as of September 1, 2003, Appendix D of the Plan is amended by adding a new
subsection (i) at the end thereof to provide as follows:


 


(i)      Each person who


 


(i)            was an active employee
of Western Wireless Corporation and became an Employee on September 1, 2003;


 


(ii)           met the eligibility
requirements to become a Participant on or before the last day of the 2003 Plan
Year; and


 


(iii)          is not otherwise
eligible for an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Year
under Section 13.04;


 

















 


shall
receive an allocation of Employer Contribution for the 2003 Plan Year as
provided in this Appendix D.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly
authorized officer, has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 10th day
of December, 2003.


 


	
   

  	
  ALLTEL CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Scott T. Ford

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  President & CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Fellowship Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 8, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Melissa Stick, PhD, MPH, Chief, Scientific Review Branch, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD/NIH, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25013 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 2429.27 Service; statement of service. ( a ) Except as provided in § 2423.10(c) and (d), any party filing a document as provided in this subchapter is responsible for serving a copy upon all counsel of record or other designated representative(s) of parties, upon parties not so represented, and upon any interested person who has been granted permission by the Authority pursuant to § 2429.9 to present written and/or oral argument as amicus curiae. Service upon such counsel or representative shall constitute service upon the party, but a copy also shall be transmitted to the party.
( b ) If you are serving a document under paragraph (a) of this section, then you must use one of the following methods of service: ( 1 ) Certified mail;
( 2 ) First-class mail;
( 3 ) Commercial delivery;
( 4 ) In-person delivery;
( 5 ) Facsimile (“fax”) service, but only for the types of documents listed in § 2429.24(g) and only where fax equipment is available; or
( 6 ) Electronic mail (“email”), but only when the receiving party has agreed to be served by email.
( c ) If you serve a document under this section, then you must file, with the appropriate FLRA office, a statement indicating that the party has served that document (a “statement of service”). If you are filing documents electronically using the FLRA's eFiling system, then you must certify, in the FLRA's eFiling system and at the time of filing, that you have served copies of the filing and any supporting documents on the appropriate individual(s) specified in paragraph (a) of this section. Regardless of how you file a statement of service with the FLRA, you must ensure that your statement of service includes the names of the parties and persons that you served, their addresses, the date on which you served them, the nature of the document(s) that you served, and the manner in which you served the parties or persons that you served. You must also sign and date the statement of service, unless you are using the FLRA's eFiling system.
( d ) *Date of service.* For any documents that you serve under this section, the date of service depends on the manner in which you serve the documents. Specifically, the date of service shall be the date on which you have: deposited the served documents in the U.S. mail; delivered them in person; deposited them with a commercial-delivery service that will provide a record showing the date on which the document was tendered to the delivery service; transmitted them by fax (where allowed under paragraph (b)(5) of this section); or transmitted them by email (where allowed under paragraph (b)(6) of this section).
[45 FR 3516, Jan. 17, 1980, as amended at 62 FR 40924, July 31, 1997; 74 FR 51745, Oct. 8, 2009; 77 FR 26437, May 4, 2012]
§ 8701.102 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) Before engaging in outside employment with or without compensation, an employee of the Office of Management and Budget, other than a special Government employee, must obtain the written approval of his or her division or office head, the General Counsel, and the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO). Requests for approval shall be forwarded through normal supervisory channels to the division or office head, who shall forward the request to the General Counsel, to be forwarded with their successive approvals to the DAEO. The request for approval shall include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) A statement of the name of the person, group, or other organization for whom the work is to be performed; the type of work to be performed; and the proposed hours of work and approximate dates of employment; and
( 2 ) A statement that the outside employment will not depend on information obtained as a result of the employee's official Government position and that no official duty time or Government property, resources, or facilities not available to the general public will be used in connection with the outside employment.
( b ) Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
( c ) For purposes of this section, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the employee. It includes, but is not limited to, personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher or speaker. It includes writing when done under an arrangement with another person for production or publication of the written product. It does not, however, include participation in the activities of a nonprofit charitable, religious, professional, social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service, or civic organization, unless such activities involve the provision of professional services or advice or are for compensation other than reimbursement of expenses.
[60 FR 12397, Mar. 7, 1995]