alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-10-020 

Contact: Victor Dricks: (817) 860-8128 

 Lara Uselding: (817) 276-6519 

 

 April 27, 2010 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2009 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

 FOR COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Richland, Wash., on May 25, with 

representatives of Energy Northwest, to discuss the agency=s 2009 assessment of safety 

performance for the Columbia Generating Station. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at Energy 

Northwest’s Business Services Center, 3000 George Washington Way, Richland. 

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public on the safety performance of Columbia Generating Station, as well as 

the NRC=s role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of Columbia Generating Station and the 

nation=s other commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. 

Collins said. AThis meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment 

of safety performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the 

plant.@

The NRC said the Columbia Generating Station operated safely during 2009 and will 

receive the detailed inspection regime during 2010 used by the NRC for plants that are operating 

safely. But it also noted the number of reactor scrams and unplanned transients last year indicated 

an adverse trend that must be addressed by the licensee. 

 Inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by 

inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 
A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2009 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wnp_2009q4.pdf . 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 922)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company.  The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors.  Comments must be received not later than January 20, 2004.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Marantz Group, LP*, Springfield, Illinois and its general partner, Tom E. Marantz, Springfield, Illinois; to retain voting shares of Staun Bancorp, Inc., Staunton, Illinois, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First Community State Bank, Staunton, Illinois.                

*2.  Joseph Thomas McLane*, Poplar Bluff, Missouri; to become a trustee of Midwest Bancorporation Inc. and Affiliates Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Poplar Bluff, Missouri, and thereby indirectly gain control of Midwest Bancorporation, Inc., Poplar Bluff, Missouri, First Midwest Bank of Carter County, Van Buren, Missouri, First Midwest Bank of Dexter, Dexter, Missouri, and First Midwest Bank of Piedmont, Piedmont, Missouri.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 31, 2003.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-249 Filed 1-6-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```

[House Report 107-273]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-273

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
  2620, DEPARTMENTS OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AND HOUSING AND URBAN 
  DEVELOPMENT, AND INDEPENDENT AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2002

                                _______
                                

  November 7, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Ms. Pryce, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 279]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 279, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2620, the Departments of 
Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and 
Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2002, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.

                                  

```
### §70110. Service of process

The corporation shall comply with the law on service of process of each State in which it is incorporated and each State in which it carries on activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1349.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70110 | 36:5604. | Sept. 23, 1996, Pub. L. 104–201, title XVIII, §1804, 110 Stat. 2761. |

Section

The words "each State in which it is incorporated" are substituted for "the State of Delaware" for consistency in the revised title.
Exhibit 99(b)



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Ronald W. Jones, Principal Financial Officer of Integon Re (Barbados),
Limited (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the
Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Ronald W. Jones
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Ronald W. Jones
                                                  March 31, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Integon Re (Barbados) Limited and will be retained by Integon Re
(Barbados) Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Solomon S. Goldsmith, Respondent, v. Philip Handelman et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Handelman & Ives, Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
#### Max Belenky et al., v. Angelo Colombo et al.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 99.]
### §136. Peace Officers Memorial Day

The President is requested to issue each year a proclamation—

(1) designating May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day in honor of Federal, State, and local officers killed or disabled in the line of duty;

(2) directing United States Government officials to display the flag of the United States at halfstaff on all Government buildings on Peace Officers Memorial Day, as provided by section 7(m) of title 4, United States Code; and

(3) inviting State and local governments and the people of the United States to observe Peace Officers Memorial Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, including the display of the flag at halfstaff.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1261.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 136 | 36:167(1), (2), (4) (related to Peace Officers Memorial Day). | Oct. 1, 1962, Pub. L. 87–726, cls. (1), (2), (4) (related to Peace Officers Memorial Day), 76 Stat. 676; Sept. 13, 1994, Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXII, §320922(a)(2)–(4), 108 Stat. 2131. |

Section

In clause (2), the reference to section 7(m) of title 4 is substituted for the reference to section 175(m) of title 36 because the latter provision is being restated in title 4. See section 2 of the bill.
### §151702. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are to—

(1) encourage, accept, and administer private gifts to promote and ensure the preservation and public accessibility of the nation's film heritage held at the Library of Congress and other public and nonprofit archives throughout the United States and the repatriation of American films from foreign archives;

(2) further the goals of the Library of Congress and the National Film Preservation Board in connection with their activities under the National Film Preservation Act of 1996 (2 U.S.C. 179l–179w); and

(3) conduct activities, alone or in cooperation with other film related institutions and organizations, to further the preservation and public accessibility of films made in the United States, particularly films not protected by private interests, for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1404; Pub. L. 110–336, §3(b)(2), Oct. 2, 2008, 122 Stat. 3728.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151702 | 36:5701(b). | Oct. 11, 1996, Pub. L. 104–285, title II, §202(b), 110 Stat. 3382. |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Film Preservation Act of 1996, referred to in par. (2), is title I of Pub. L. 104–285, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3377, which is classified principally to section 179l et seq. of Title 2, The Congress. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 179l of Title 2 and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Par. (1). Pub. L. 110–336 substituted "United States and the repatriation of American films from foreign archives;" for "United States;".
### §281. Remedy for infringement of patent

A patentee shall have remedy by civil action for infringement of his patent.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 812.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§67 and 70, part (R.S. 4919; R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).

The corresponding two sections of existing law are divided among sections 281, 283, 284, 285, 286 and 289 with some changes in language. Section 281 serves as an introduction or preamble to the following sections, the modern term civil action is used, there would be, of course, a right to a jury trial when no injunction is sought.
#### Nat C. Strong, Inc., Appellant, v. William A. Leuschner, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §130501. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Little League Baseball, Incorporated (in this chapter, the "corporation"), is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1376.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130501 | 36:1071. | July 16, 1964, Pub. L. 88–378, §§1, 2, 78 Stat. 325. |
| | 36:1072. | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words. The text of 36:1072 is omitted as executed.
§ 630.703 Computation of shore leave. ( a ) An employee earns shore leave at the rate of 1 day of shore leave for each 15 calendar days of absence on one or more extended voyages.
( b ) ( 1 ) For an employee who is an officer or crewmember, a voyage begins either on the date he assumes his duties aboard an oceangoing vessel to begin preparation for a voyage or on the date he comes aboard when a voyage is in progress. The voyage terminates on the date he ceases to be an officer or crewmember of the oceangoing vessel or on the date on which he is released from assignment of his duties relating to that voyage aboard the oceangoing vessel at the port of origin or port of final discharge, whichever is earlier.
( 2 ) For an employee other than an officer or crewmember, a voyage begins on the date of sailing and terminates on the date the oceangoing vessel returns to a port at which the employee will disembark in completion of his assignment aboard the vessel, or on the date he is released from his assignment aboard the vessel, whichever is earlier.
( c ) In computing days of absence, an agency shall include ( 1 ) the beginning date of a voyage and the termination date of a voyage;
( 2 ) the days an employee spends traveling to join an oceangoing vessel to which assigned when the vessel is at a place other than the port of origin;
( 3 ) the days an employee spends traveling between oceangoing vessels when the employee is assigned from one vessel to another;
( 4 ) the period representing the number of days within which an employee is reasonably expected to return to the port of origin when his oceangoing vessel's voyage is terminated, or his employment as an officer or crewmember is terminated, at a port other than the port of origin;
( 5 ) for an employee who is an officer or crewmember, the days on which he is on sick leave when he becomes sick during a voyage (whether or not continued as a member of the crew) but not beyond the termination date of the voyage of the oceangoing vessel or his repatriation to the port of origin, whichever is earlier;
( 6 ) for an employee other than an officer or crewmember, the days on which he is carried on sick leave but not beyond the date on which he returns to the port of origin or the termination date of the voyage, whichever is earlier; and
( 7 ) the days of approved leave from a vessel (paid or unpaid) during a voyage.
District Clerk’s LetterOnReceipt NOAatt.wpd

CHRIS DANIEL

HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK

CIVIL/FAMILY POST TRIAL

DATE: March 22, 2018

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS INFORMATION SHEET BY TRIAL COURT CLERK

Note to trial court clerk: You are expected to file the clerk’s record by the original due date. If 

you cannot, you should advise the Clerk of the First Court of Appeals immediately in writing, 

stating the reason and the date by which the record will be filed. Generally speaking, for good 

cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two extensions from the original due date, 

each extension not to exceed 30 days.

Appellate Case Number 01-18-00192-CV

Trial Court Case Number:2017-00441

Trial Court Number 311TH

______________________________________________________________________________

Information from Trial Court Clerk

The clerk’s record will be completed and filed with the appellate court clerk by the 

original due date, subject to payment arrangements being made.

XXX The clerk’s record will not be filed by the original due date. (Please state reasons below) 

Reason(s): The Appellant filed their notice of appeal well after the due date of the 

original clerks record. It appears that casefile is voluminous in size and 

in order fully prepare the clerks record more time is needed ..

I believe I can file the clerk’s record by 4/13/18, and I request an extension.

 

Appellant has not made payment arrangements.

Appellant has been notified that the clerk’s record is ready.

Appellant has made payment arrangements.

Clerk’s Signature: /S/ DUANE C. GILMORE

DUANE C. GILMORE, 

Civil/Family Post Trial Clerk

Harris County District Clerk

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/22/2018 4:52:39 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7000

WILLIE JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee, and JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (0:07-cv-00604) Submitted: August 10, 2007 Decided: August 24, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Willie Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §150709. Headquarters and principal office

The headquarters and principal office of the corporation shall be in the District of Columbia, Maryland, or Virginia. However, the activities of the corporation are not confined to the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia but may be conducted throughout the States, territories, and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1394.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150709 | 36:435(a). | Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 427, §5(a), 67 Stat. 563. |

Section

The word "office" is substituted for "offices" for consistency with section 150710 and other sections of the revised title. The words "the States of" and "various" are omitted as unnecessary.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2009-0301 Directorate ID: 2008-SW-69-AD

Helicopter Model: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited Model 206A, 206B, 206L, 206L-1, 

206L-3, 206L-4, 222, 222B, 222U, 230, 407, 427, and 430 helicopters.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 3,741 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of a blade tip weight, loss of a blade, 

and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter

Labor per Helicopter

(2 work hours X $80 for 

the determination)

$160

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter

Total U.S. Fleet Cost $598,560 assuming all shipping, inspection, and 

repair costs are paid by Rotor Blades, Inc., or 

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Sharon Miles