alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t FORM Q-USf (1-92)

MEMORANDUM R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

March 20, 2000 

L-2000-9

TO: V. M. Speakman, Jr. 

Labor Member

FROM: Steven A. Barthc

General Counsel

SUBJECT: Payments for Attendance at a Meeting of a Railway Labor 

Organization’s State Legislative Board

This is in reply to your February 29, 2000 inquiry as to the characterization of 

payments made to an individual for his attendance at the Quadrennial 

Reorganization Meeting of the Illinois Legislative Board of the United 

Transportation Union (UTU).

Information provided indicates that the individual in question is a legislative 

representative of the UTU’s Illinois Legislative Board who is currently in a nonpaid position with the local union. The representative will receive a small amount 

of compensation in addition to a per diem rate of $113.00 per day when attending 

the Quadrennial Meeting.

To be considered compensation creditable under the Railroad Retirement Act, the 

earnings received must be for services rendered as an employee or employee 

representative. See 45 U.SC. § 231(h)(1). Under the circumstances described, it is 

my opinion that the legislative representative would not be providing services for 

an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act, but would merely be serving as 

a representative at the Board Meeting. Consequently, the payments he receives 

for his attendance at the Board Meeting would not be creditable as compensation. 

Rather, the payments received would constitute self-employment income, similar 

to that received by a member of a Board of Directors of a corporation. See 1999 

Social Security Explained. 1401.2. As such, the amounts paid to the individual 

would constitute non-railroad earnings subject to the monthly earnings lim it for 

disabled employee annuitants.
-2 -

Your inquiry recounts the Board’s position as to how to characterize payments 

made to delegates to conventions of a national convention of their union. The 

gathering at issue in this case is a meeting, not a convention. However, if the 

meeting at issue was a convention, the rationale behind the policy adopted in 1994 

would extend to any convention where the delegate is not subject to the direction 

and control of the entity sponsoring the convention.

NV^usselhatw

H:\MISC\LegRep.NVR
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# September 2009 Report (Reissued) on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML092950563

Date Released: Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML092950290 - September 2009 Report (Reissued) on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 10/23/2009)
    - ML092950295 - Enclosures: September 2009 (Reissued) Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regultions, Section 2.206. (3 page(s), 10/23/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
# L_2020340EN.01003701.xml

| 15.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 340/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 340/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 100/2018

of 27 April 2018

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2020/1460]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/208 of 12 February 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 establishing a Union Registry (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/208 of 12 February 2018 amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 establishing a Union Registry (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is inserted in point 21ana (Commission Regulation (EU) No 389/2013) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 0208: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/208 of 12 February 2018 (OJ L 39, 13.2.2018, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32018 R 0208: Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/208 of 12 February 2018 (OJ L 39, 13.2.2018, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2018/208 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 April 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 April 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 39, 13.2.2018, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Argued and submitted November 2,

reversed and remanded December 6, 2000

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*GREGORY ROBERT GANN, *Respondent.*

(991247; CA A109184)

15 P3d 99

Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

James B. Ehrlich argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Wollheim, Judges.

PER CURIAM
#### § 9001.109 Prohibited purchase of assets.

An employee or the employee's spouse or minor children shall not purchase, directly or indirectly, any real or personal property from a regulated entity, unless it is sold at public auction or by other means which would assure that the selling price is the asset's fair market value.
### §3355. Improving recovery of improper payments

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall determine—

(1) current and historical rates and amounts of recovery of improper payments, or, in cases in which improper payments are identified solely on the basis of a sample, recovery rates and amounts estimated on the basis of the applicable sample, including a list of executive agency recovery audit contract programs and specific information of amounts and payments recovered by recovery audit contractors; and

(2) targets for recovering improper payments, including specific information on amounts and payments recovered by recovery audit contractors.

(Added Pub. L. 116–117, §2(a), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 130.)
#### § 890.1054 Agencies and entities to be notified of reinstatements.

OPM shall inform the FEHBP carriers, Government agencies and other organizations that were originally notified of a provider's debarment when a provider is reinstated under § 890.1051 or § 890.1052.
§ 841.415 Right to request reconsideration of the supplemental liability. ( a ) The Secretary of the Treasury or the Postmaster General may request the Board to reconsider a determination of the amount payable with respect to any supplemental liability.
( b ) No request for reconsideration will be considered by the Board unless the Secretary of the Treasury or the Postmaster General files, no later than 6 months after the date of receipt of the first notice of the amount payable with respect to the supplemental liability, a request for reconsideration that meets *all* the requirements of § 841.416.
[82 FR 49281, Oct. 25, 2017]
§ 842.403 Computation of basic annuity. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and §§ 842.405 and 842.406, the annuity of an employee or Member is 1 percent of average pay multiplied by total service.
( b ) The annuity of an employee is 1.1 percent of average pay multiplied by total service, provided the individual— ( 1 ) Has completed 20 years of service; and
( 2 ) At the time of separation on which entitlement to an annuity is based— ( i ) Is at least age 62; and
( ii ) Is not a customs and border protection officer, a Member, Congressional employee, military reserve technician, law enforcement officer, firefighter, nuclear materials courier, or air traffic controller.
[52 FR 4475, Feb. 11, 1987, as amended at 76 FR 42000, July 18, 2011]
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE
CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|                   |  |  |  |                                    
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------
|                   |  |  |  |                                    
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN LAMSON                 
|                   |  |  |  |                                    
|                   |  |  |  | John Lamson Chief Financial
Officer
|                   |  |  |  |                                    

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
----

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | · | the                Quarterly Report of the                Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, (the “Report”),                which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | the                information contained in the                Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   /s/                James P.                Clark      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                              |   |
|                  James P. Clark                              |   |
|                  President and Chief Executive Officer  |   |

|   /s/                Joanne                Forsberg |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                          |   |
|  Joanne                Forsberg                          |   |
|  Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary    |   |

----
OFFICE OFNTHE SECRETARY D M I ArC F/T

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Apr 10, 2007 14:52

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

LTR-07-0226

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 04/07/2007

EDO

DEDR

DEDMRsT

DEDIA

AO GOV Phil Bredesen

TN-GOV

CHRM Dale Klein

Concerns the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive

materials

Appropriate

RF

03/26/2007

Yes

Made publicly available in ADAMS via EDO/DPC

. NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
,ý q

OF TENNESSEE"

PHIL BREDESEN

GOvERNOR

26 March 200J7

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 651 (e) of the Energy

Policy Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced

radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections 1 le.(3) and 1 le.(4) of the

Atomic Energy Act Of 1954, as amended..

-In 1965, the State of Tennessee entered into an Agreement with the Commission under

Section 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that Agreement, the State.

licenses byproduct material as defined in Section 1 le.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, the

State licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined

as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the

program for licensing 11 e.(1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the licensing

program that would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy. Further, we intend to

continue to license the new byproduct materialunder this same program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission.that the State of Tennessee has a program for

licensing byproduct material, as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section Ile. of the Atomic

Energy Act of 1954, as amended, that is adequate to protect the public health and safety, and that

the State intends to continue to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the

byproduct material. -

This'certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the Transition

'of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material."

r.'l~ ely,

. -- .. -°. ...-

Phil Bredesen

State Capitol, Nashville, Tennessee.37243-0001,

Telephone No. (615) 741-2001
B.C.D. 00-16

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION MAY 1 0 2000

Nimishillen & Tuscarawas Railway Company (N&T)

Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC (NT-LLC)

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continued status of Nimishillen & Tuscarawas Railway Company (N&T), B.A.

No. 3278, and the current status of Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC as

employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.) (RRA)

and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seq.) (RUIA).

Information obtained in response to a coverage investigation of N&T indicates

that N&T was a switching line that operated approximately 24.7 miles of rail

line in Perry and Canton, Ohio. Information obtained indicates that Republic

Engineered Steels, Inc. (RESI), a Delaware Corporation, of which N&T was a

wholly-owned subsidiary, and Republic Technologies International, LLC (RTI),

a Delaware limited liability company, entered into a merger agreement in

accordance with the requirements of Section 18-209 of the Delaware Limited

Liability Company Act, and in accordance with Section 264 of the Delaware

General Corporation Law (DGCL), to merge N&T into Nimishillen &

Tuscarawas, LLC (NT-LLC) effective August 13, 1999. According to the

Certificate of Merger filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, the merger

agreement was adopted by written consent of the sole stockholder of N&T in

accordance with Section 228 of the DGCL on that date. No Surface

Transportation Board decision was available regarding the merger.

From the information obtained regarding N&T, it appears that all railroad

trackage operations, and employees have been transferred to NT-LLC, the

surviving entity.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR 202.11) of the Board’s regulations states that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate

whenever such company or person loses any of the characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status.

Also, section 1(a)(1) of the RRA defines the term “employer” to include:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface

Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle IV of Title 49 [45

U.S.C. §231(a)(l)(i)].

*****

BA# 3278
-2-

NimishiUen & Tuscarawas Railway Company (N&T)

Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC (NT-LLC)

Section 1 of the RUIA contains the same definition.

The information summarized above indicates that N&T no longer possesses

the characteristics of an operating railroad company. The Board therefore

finds that effective with the close of business on August 13, 1999, the date the

merger was filed with the State of Delaware, Nimishillen & Tuscarawas

Railway Company ceased to be a covered employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act. Additionally,

the Board finds that Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC became a covered rail

carrier employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act effective that same date. Lastly, the Board finds

that NT-LLC is the successor employer of the former N&T for purposes of 

experience rating under the RUIA. See 20 CFR §345.203.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
###### Editorial Note on Part 735

#### Editorial Note:

Part 1001, added to this chapter at 31 FR 873, Jan. 22, 1966 and revised at 32 FR 11113, Aug. 1, 1967, 36 FR 6874, Apr. 9, 1971, 61 FR 36996, July 16, 1996, and 71 FR 43345, Aug. 1, 2006, supplements this part 735.

#### § 735.203 What are the restrictions on conduct prejudicial to the Government?

An employee shall not engage in criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct, or other conduct prejudicial to the Government.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-168 December 19, 2007 

NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED SECURITY 

REQUIREMENTS FOR A NUCLEAR WASTE REPOSITORY 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking public comment on a proposed 

rule that would amend security requirements for a high-level nuclear waste geologic 

repository proposed for Yucca Mountain, Nev. 

 The agency will hold a public meeting Jan. 23 in Las Vegas to describe the 

proposed rule and receive public comments. 

 The proposed rule, to be published soon in the Federal Register, would establish 

new security and material control and accounting requirements for a “geologic repository 

operations area.” The goal of the rule is to ensure that effective security measures are in 

place for the protection of high-level radioactive waste and other radioactive material at a 

repository in the post-Sept. 11 threat environment. 

 New requirements for security training, improved access authorization, 

improvements to defensive strategies and enhanced reporting requirements are included 

in the rule. The proposed rule would also establish general performance objectives and 

capabilities for the material control and accountability program and would require the 

emergency response plan to address radiological emergencies. 

 The proposed rule will be available through the NRC’s ADAMS online document 

library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html by entering access 

number ML073370554. 

 

 The NRC will accept public comments on the proposed rule for 75 days following 

publication in the Federal Register. Comments may be mailed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C., 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and 
Adjudication Staff. They may also be submitted by e-mail to SECY@nrc.gov or through 

the federal eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov. Comments should include the 

number RIN 3150-AI06. 

 The Jan. 23 public meeting will be held at the NRC’s Las Vegas Hearing Facility, 

Pacific Enterprise Plaza, Building One, 3250 Pepper Lane, Las Vegas, from 3 p.m. to 7 

p.m. After a brief presentation on the rule by NRC staff, the floor will be open for public 

comments. NRC staff will not answer questions regarding the rule during the meeting. 

 Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting are requested to pre-register 

by contacting Vivian Mehrhoff at (702) 794-5053 or vlm@nrc.gov by Jan. 22. 

Registration will also be taken at the meeting. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
§ 847.211 Death of employee during election opportunity period. ( a ) When an employee eligible to make an election under this subpart dies before expiration of the time limit under § 847.206, the employee is deemed to have made the election and to be covered, at time of death, by the retirement system that covered the employee before the qualifying move.
( b ) The deemed election under paragraph (a) of this section does not apply if the eligible survivor elects to have it not apply.
( c ) An election by the survivor to decline the deemed election must be in writing and filed no later than 30 days after the employing agency notifies the survivor of the right to decline the deemed election.