alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 1535—NATIONAL TROPICAL BOTANICAL GARDEN**

Sec.
153501.
Organization.
153502.
Purposes.
153503.
Membership.
153504.
Governing body.
153505.
Powers.
153506.
Exclusive right to name.
153507.
Restrictions.
153508.
Principal office and location of activities and gardens.
153509.
Records and inspection.
153510.
Statement required in audit report.
153511.
Service of process.
153512.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
153513.
Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation.
153514.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2014**—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(c)(7), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2840, added item 153514.
**FREEDOM
      BANCSHARES, INC.**


**AND
      SUBSIDIARY**





**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Freedom
      Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September
      30, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,
      pursuant to Title 18, Section 1350 United States Code, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge
      and
      belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November
      14, 2007








/s/
                Clyde A. McArthurClyde
                A. McArthurChief
                Financial Officer











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Freedom Bancshares, Inc. and
      furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





The
      information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|   |                    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Laura V. Stack      |
|   | Laura V. Stack          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

April 7, 2008
AAM-2011-1362 

December 23, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10419 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1362 

Mr. Mark Nelson 

Substance Prevention/Abuse Program Manager 

Hawk Aviation, Inc. 

51601 Forest Boulevard 

Rush City, MN 55069 

Dear Mr. Nelson: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 6, 2011 you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Hawk Aviation (Hawk) for an exemption from § 120.1(a) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Hawk to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Hawk. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Hawk Aviation, Inc. an exemption from 

14 CFR § 120.1(a) to the extent necessary to allow Hawk to cover its safety-sensitive 

employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described 

below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Hawk Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

Hawk Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on January 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
### §70305. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1350.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 70305(a) | 36:2206. | Jan. 8, 1983, Pub. L. 97–427, §§6, 7, 96 Stat. 2265. |
| 70305(b) | 36:2207. | |

Section

The words "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States in which it is incorporated" in 36:2206 and "and in conformity with the laws of the State or States wherein it is incorporated" in 36:2207 are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vanessa Avila, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 12, 2006

/s/ Vanessa AvilaVanessa Avila
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
### §153512. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1427.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153512 | 36:4609. | Aug. 19, 1964, Pub. L. 88–449, §9, 78 Stat. 498. |

Section
NRC TO HOLD MANAGEMENT MEETING WITH SHAW AREVA TO DISCUSS 

PROGRESS ON MIXED-OXIDE NUCLEAR FUEL PLANT 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public management meeting with 

officials from Shaw Areva MOX Services on Wed., April 29, in Aiken, S.C., to discuss the 

current status of the license review, oversight activities, and construction of the mixed-oxide 

(MOX) nuclear fuel fabrication facility at the Savannah River Site. 

 The meeting will be held from 7 to 9 p.m. at the Aiken Federal Building, 151 Corporate 

Parkway, in Aiken. Members of the public will be welcome to observe the meeting and will be 

given one or more opportunities to speak with NRC staff. 

 Interested parties may also listen by teleconference. For call-in information, contact 

Catina Gibbs at 301-492-3204 or Catina.Gibbs@nrc.gov. 

 The MOX facility will fabricate fuel for use in commercial nuclear power plants, using a 

mixture of uranium and plutonium left over from U.S. weapons production. 

 The NRC issued a construction authorization for the facility in March 2005, and is 

currently reviewing Shaw Areva MOX Service’s application for an operating license. Public 

meetings were held in the vicinity on April 12, 2007, and Dec. 15, 2008. 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-077 April 24, 2009
#### George A. Barnds, Appellant, v. Beatrice Wiley et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for injuries from the bites of a dog, judgment entered in favor of defendants, after trial by the court, without a jury, and order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the judgment, for a new trial, to make additions to the stenographer’s minutes, etc., unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
| Not in Archive.

The page you requested has not been archived. If the page is still available on the Internet, we will begin archiving it during our next crawl.Try another request or click here to search for all pages onepa.gov/iaq/hbhp/sec01.pdfSee the FAQs for more info and help, or contact us. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

Home |                                                Help

Copyright © 2001,                                                Internet Archive |                                                Terms of Use |                                                Privacy Policy
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Eduardo Avila, Chief Financial Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc. for the period ended November 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.

Dated: January 21, 2007

/s/ Eduardo AvilaEduardo Avila
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
### §131. Examination of application

The Director shall cause an examination to be made of the application and the alleged new invention; and if on such examination it appears that the applicant is entitled to a patent under the law, the Director shall issue a patent therefor.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §36 (R.S. 4893).

The first part is revised in language and amplified. The phrase "and that the invention is sufficiently useful and important" is omitted as unnecessary, the requirements for patentability being stated in sections 101, 102 and 103.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.

1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Pre-Prosecution Assessment Pilot Program

Pub. L. 117–328, div. W, §106, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5521, provided that:

"(a) Pilot Program.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 29, 2022], the Director shall establish a pilot program to assist first-time prospective patent applicants in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a potential patent application submitted by such a prospective applicant.

"(b) Considerations.—In developing the pilot program required under subsection (a), the Director shall establish—

"(1) a notification process to notify a prospective patent applicant seeking an assessment described in that subsection that any assessment so provided may not be considered an official ruling of patentability from the Office;

"(2) conditions to determine eligibility for the pilot program, taking into consideration available resources;

"(3) reasonable limitations on the amount of time to be spent providing assistance to each individual first-time prospective patent applicant;

"(4) procedures for referring prospective patent applicants to legal counsel, including through the patent pro bono programs; and

"(5) procedures to protect the confidentiality of the information disclosed by prospective patent applicants."

[For definitions of terms used in section 106 of div. W of Pub. L. 117–328, set out above, see section 102 of div. W of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as a Definitions note under section 1 of this title.]
#### Herbert Werblowsky, an Infant, by Gerda W. Van Dam, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Moritz Werblowsky, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWIGHT JONES, a/k/a Shakey,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 96-7873

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWIGHT JONES, a/k/a Shakey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-162, CA-96-740)
2

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 18, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Hechtkopf, Robert Esten

Lindsay, Meghan Suzanne Skelton, Karen Marie Quesnel, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997),

and motions for reconsideration and recusal. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss these appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Jones, Nos. CR-92-162; CA-96-740 (E.D. Va. Aug. 13; Sept.

10 & Oct. 30, 1996). Additionally, we deny Appellant's motion to

stay the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §558. Income tax deferment

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a Federal income tax return of, or the payment of a Federal income tax by, a member of a uniformed service who, at the time the return or payment would otherwise become due, is in a missing status, does not become due until the earlier of the following dates—

(1) the fifteenth day of the third month in which he ceased (except by reason of death or incompetency) being in a missing status, unless before the end of that fifteenth day he is again in a missing status; or

(2) the fifteenth day of the third month after the month in which an executor, administrator, or conservator of the estate of the taxpayer is appointed.

That due date is prescribed subject to the power of the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate to extend the time for filing the return or paying the tax, as in other cases, and to assess and collect the tax as provided by sections 6851, 6861, and 6871 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 in cases in which the assessment or collection is jeopardized and in cases of bankruptcy or receivership.

(Added Pub. L. 89–554, §5(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631; amended Pub. L. 96–513, title V, §516(16), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2939; Pub. L. 100–26, §8(c), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 285.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 558 | 50 App. 1013. | Mar. 7, 1942, ch. 166, §13, 56 Stat. 146; Aug. 8, 1947, ch. 515, §6, 61 Stat. 918; Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–428, §1(9), 78 Stat. 437. |

Only that portion of the source law which is applicable to members of the uniformed services and their dependents is codified in this section.

The words "in the case of any taxable year beginning after December 31, 1940" are omitted as unnecessary.

The words "as defined in section 101(3) and (23) of title 37, United States Code" are omitted as unnecessary since the revised section is codified in title 37. The words "in a missing status" are substituted for "absent from his duty station under the conditions specified in section 2 of the Act" to conform to the definition in revised section 551(3) of this chapter and in view of the provisions of revised section 552 establishing the entitlement of a member in a missing status to receive pay and allowances or have them credited to his account. Reference to "title 26" is substituted for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 6851, 6861, and 6871 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in text, are classified to sections 6851, 6861, and 6871, respectively, of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

#### Amendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–26 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954" in last sentence.

1980—Pub. L. 96–513 substituted "the Internal Revenue Code of 1954" for "title 26".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–513 effective Dec. 12, 1980, see section 701(b)(3) of Pub. L. 96–513, set out as a note under section 101 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §272. Temporary presence in the United States

The use of any invention in any vessel, aircraft or vehicle of any country which affords similar privileges to vessels, aircraft or vehicles of the United States, entering the United States temporarily or accidentally, shall not constitute infringement of any patent, if the invention is used exclusively for the needs of the vessel, aircraft or vehicle and is not offered for sale or sold in or used for the manufacture of anything to be sold in or exported from the United States.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 812; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, §533(b)(4), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4989.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section follows the requirement of the International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, to which the United States is a party, and also codifies the holding of the Supreme Court that use of a patented invention on board a foreign ship does not infringe a patent.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "not offered for sale or sold" for "not sold".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective on date that is one year after date on which the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(a), (b)(3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.