alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014079EN.01000101.xml

| 18.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/1

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius

Following signature on 21 December 2013, the Republic of Mauritius and the European Union notified on 17 January and 28 January 2014 respectively, that they had finalised their internal procedures to conclude the Fisheries Partnership Agreement.

The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 28 January 2014 pursuant to Article 17 thereof.

---
No. 41,721

#### Clyde F. Rakes, *Appellee,*v. Wright Cooperative Exchange, Farmers Elevator Mutual Casualty Company, Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance Company, *Appellants.*

(347 P. 2d 389)

Opinion filed December 12, 1959.

*Clarence N. Holeman,*of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellants.

*Keith M. Wilcox,*of Sublette, argued the cause, and *Richard A. Hickey*and *Rex A. Neubauer,*both of Liberal, and *Collis R. Hamer,*of Dodge City, were with him on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is a workmen’s compensation case, and the employer and its insurance carrier appeal from the award.

The' only question involved,is whether the finding that the workman sustained a five per cent permanent partial disability is supported by any substantial evidence.

The facts surrounding the accidental injury and resulting dis*795ability need not be detailed. It is sufficient to say that on March 5, 1956, the workman, a truck driver, while assisting in loading oats with the use of a mechanical grain auger, fell astraddle the auger and it struck him between his legs and across his back when he fell against the side of the truck. He was hospitalized. Prior to the accident he weighed 175 pounds, but at the time of hearing on his claim for compensation weighed only 140 pounds. He continued to experience severe pains in his back, although such fact did not disable him from employment.

At the conclusion of the hearing the commissioner made an award for temporary total disability and for medical expenses, with which we are not concerned, and found that the workman had suffered a five per cent permanent partial disability and made an award accordingly.

On appeal, the district court, after reviewing the record, approved the commissioner’s findings and adopted them as its own.

From that judgment respondents have appealed.

Almost every month this court has occasion to repeat the familiar rule pertaining to appeals in workmen’s compensation cases to the effect that its jurisdiction is limited to the determination of questions of law, which, as applied to facts, means that this court reviews the record only to determine whether it contains substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings, and that in so doing all of the evidence is reviewed and considered in the light most favorable to the prevailing party in the trial court. If substantial evidence appears, such findings are conclusive and will not be disturbed on appellate review. *(Snedden v.*Nichols, 181 Kan. 1052, 317 P. 2d 448; *La Rue v. Sierra Petroleum Co.,*183 Kan. 153, 325 P. 2d 59; *Weimer v. Sauder Tank Co.,*184 Kan. 422, 425, 337 P. 2d 672, and cases cited in those opinions.)

Specifically, then, the question here is whether there is any substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s finding that the workman sustained a five per cent permanent partial disability.

In answer to this question we merely state that the record has been read and considered, and that the question must be answered in the affirmative. Such being the case, the judgment is affirmed.
# Wright Brothers Day, 2018

On December 17, 1903, two American brothers from Dayton, Ohio, Orville and Wilbur Wright, launched the first manned, powered flight on a windy beach in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. Their handcrafted biplane, though aloft a mere 12 seconds, ushered in the age of aviation and changed the course of history. On Wright Brothers Day, we commemorate this monumental achievement and look ahead to new chapters of American aviation in which new scientists, inventors, dreamers, and entrepreneurs will change history, fulfilling the human spirit's relentless quest for exploration and discovery.

In the 115 years since the Wright brothers achieved their groundbreaking flight, the United States has led the world in aviation innovation. We have developed supersonic jets, walked on the moon, placed increasingly advanced landers and rovers on Mars, and vaulted spacecraft into the far reaches of the universe to explore distant horizons. The aviation industry has transformed the way we live and communicate, strengthening our connections to other nations and continents, expanding the global marketplace, and extending the frontiers of imagination and experimentation. These revolutionary achievements trace their origins back to the triumphs of Orville and Wilbur, two daring pioneers who, fueled by passion, undeterred by years of failure, and empowered by legendary American intrepidity, took mankind to new heights.

We reflect with pride on the historic successes of our Nation's aviation visionaries, and we look ahead to a future of limitless potential and even greater accomplishment. My Administration is working to build on America's heritage as aviation pioneers and the world's greatest space-faring nation. I have instructed Federal agencies to embrace aeronautics and space industries of the future by modernizing our outdated regulations and funding aerospace research and development. We will broaden America's leadership in aerospace technology, including through the return of civil supersonic flight, the growth of commercial unmanned aircraft systems, and continued innovation in space exploration and travel. As we continue our pursuits in flight, we are indebted to the Wright brothers for hazarding to dream and inspiring our Nation to look heavenward.

The Congress, by a joint resolution approved December 17, 1963, as amended (77 Stat. 402; 36 U.S.C. 143), has designated December 17 of each year as “Wright Brothers Day” and has authorized and requested the President to issue annually a proclamation inviting the people of the United States to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim December 17, 2018, as Wright Brothers Day.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourteenth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-third.

[FR Doc. 2018-27624

Billing code 3295-F9-P
### §153711. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1430.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153711 | 36:1012. | Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–650, §12, 76 Stat. 505. |

Section
#### § 843.302 Time for filing applications for death benefits.

A current or former spouse of a deceased retiree, employee, or separated employee may file an application for benefits under this subpart, personally or through a representative, at any time within 30 years after the death of the retiree, employee, or separated employee.
exv10w62



 







RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003



Exhibit 10.62




Richard A. Young

219 Winchester Beach Drive

Annapolis, MD 21401 USA


Dear Richard:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Richard A. Young
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: April 14, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 90,000

Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting



30,000 on 04/14/2004

30,000 on 04/14/2005

30,000 on 04/14/2006


By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Richard A. Young

	 	Date: ________________
	                     Richard A. Young
	 	 






Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
# The Effects of Ultra

- Low Sulfur Gasoline on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles in the In

- Use Fleet

Final Report

Appendix B Emission Concentration Plots

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data thatare currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments.

EPA-420-R-14-002 March 2014

### Appendix B. Emission Concentration Plots

646566676869
§ 550.1501 General. ( a ) *Statutory authority.* This subpart implements the Civilian Service Recognition Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-73; December 20, 2011), reprinted as a note to 5 U.S.C.A. 5570, which authorizes agencies to give a flag of the United States to a beneficiary of a Federal civilian employee who dies of injuries incurred in connection with his or her employment with the Federal Government, under specific circumstances.
( b ) *Eligibility.* Agencies may furnish a flag to the beneficiary (as defined in § 550.1503) of an eligible employee (as specified in § 550.1504) who died on or after December 20, 2011.
§ 842.905 Evidence. ( a ) The Secretary of Energy's determination under § 842.903 that a position is a primary position must be based solely on the official position description of the position in question, and any other official description of duties and qualifications. The official documentation for the position must establish that it satisfies the requirements defined in § 842.902.
( b ) A determination under § 842.904 must be based on the official position description and any other evidence deemed appropriate by the agency head for making the determination.
( c ) If an employee is in a position not subject to the one-half percent higher withholding rate of 5 U.S.C. 8422(a)(3), and the employee does not, within 6 months after entering the position or after any significant change in the position, formally and in writing seek a determination from the employing agency that his or her service is properly covered by the higher withholding rate, the agency head's determination that the service was not so covered at the time of the service is presumed to be correct. This presumption may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence that the employee was unaware of his or her status or was prevented by cause beyond his or her control from requesting that the official status be changed at the time the service was performed.
Section 1350 Certification

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

        In connection with the quarterly report of Pioneer  Financial  Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the  capacity  and on the  date  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as amended;  and (2) the  information  contained in this
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.

        Date: May 12, 2006

                                              By:  /s/ Randall J. Opliger
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Randall J. Opliger
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.01.2


 


September 16,
2003


 


Dear
Sandy:


 


In order to
appropriately reflect the recently announced succession plan, this letter
agreement (“2003 Agreement”) shall serve as an amendment to the Amended and
Restated Employment Agreement (the “2001 Agreement”) dated as of
November 16, 2001 between you (“Weill”) and Citigroup Inc. (the
“Company”).


 


The
first two sentences of Section 1 of the 2001 Agreement are hereby amended
to read as follows:


 


1.                                       Employment.  The
Company agrees to employ Weill on a full-time basis as its Chairman of the
Board.  Weill shall have in such
position all of the duties, responsibilities and powers afforded to the
Chairman of the Board under the Articles of Incorporation and the By-laws of
the Company, as in effect from time to time.


 


Section 3
of the 2001 Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:


 


3.                                       Employment Term.  The
employment relationship created by this Agreement shall commence as of the date
hereof and continue until the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the
Company, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of Section 5
below (the “Employment Term”).


 


The
last paragraph of Section 5(a) of the 2001 Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting the words:


 


“or pursuant to a notice of non-renewal given by the Company as
described in Section 3 above”


 


Section 5(b)(v)
of the 2001 Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the words:


 


“or pursuant to a notice of non-renewal given by the Company as
described in Section 3 above”


 

















 


Mr. Sanford I. Weill


September 16, 2003


Page 2


 


Except
as specifically modified herein, all of the terms and provisions of the 2001
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Please indicate your
acceptance of the foregoing amendments by signing below.


 


 


	
  Citigroup Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Michael S.
  Helfer

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Michael S. Helfer,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Corporate Secretary

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Accepted and Agreed:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Sanford I. Weill

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Sanford I. Weill
### **CHAPTER 2103—369TH VETERANS' ASSOCIATION**

Sec.
210301.
Definition.
210302.
Organization.
210303.
Purposes.
210304.
Membership.
210305.
Governing body.
210306.
Powers.
210307.
Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges.
210308.
Restrictions.
210309.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
210310.
Records and inspection.
210311.
Service of process.
210312.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
210313.
Annual report.
#### Robert H. Solof et al., Appellants, v. Samuel Heitner et al., Respondents.

—In an action for the removal of that part of defendants’ garage which is erected within the area restricted by covenants and the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Hempstead, and for damages suffered in consequence of defend*739ants’ illegal acts, judgment was rendered in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint on the ground that the violations were insignificant and the damage sustained was too trivial for relief, and on the further ground that plaintiffs were guilty of laches. Judgment modified on the facts by striking from the first paragraph thereof everything which follows the words “ on the merits” and by substituting therefor the words “without costs, it is” and by striking from the second paragraph of said judgment everything which follows the words “upon the merits.” As so modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Upon the facts disclosed by this record, respondents should not have been awarded costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Mac-Crate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

4 Rails Incorporated

This is a determination as to the employer status of 4 Rails, Inc.

(4 Rails) under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) (45 U.S.C. §231

et sea.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) (45

U.S.C. §351 et sea.). 4 Rails has not previously been held to be

an employer under the Acts.

The evidence is that 4 Rails was incorporated March 19, 1992, as a

privately held corporation. On April 21, 1992, 4 Rails

incorporated the McCloud Railway Company (McCloud Railway) as a

wholly owned subsidiary. In May 1992, the Interstate Commerce

Commission exempted from regulation a transaction whereby 4 Rails

acquired from the McCloud River Railroad approximately 97 miles of

right of way in Siskiyou and Shasta Counties, California. See:

McCloud Railway Company--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--

McCloud River Railroad Company. Finance Docket No. 32069, 57 Fed.

Reg. 23599, (June 4, 1992) . 4 Rails in turn leased the property to

its subsidiary, which conducts rail carrier service over the line.

Eighty percent of 4 Rails' gross revenue derives from its

subsidiary rail carrier; the balance from non-railroad sources. 4

Rails has never had any employees.

Section 1 of the RRA defines "employer" to include:

(i) any express company, sleeping car company, and

carrier by railroad, subject to subchapter I of chapter

105 of Title 49;

(ii) any company which is directly or indirectly

owned or controlled by, or under common control with, one 

or more employers as defined in paragraph (i) of this 

subdivision, and which operates any equipment or facility

or performs any service (except trucking service, casual

service, and the casual operation of equipment or

facilities) in connection with the transportation of

passengers or property by railroad, or the receipt,

delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration

or icing, storage, or handling of property transported by

railroad. (45 U.S.C. §231 (a) (1) (i) and (ii) ) .

Section 1 of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. § 351) and section 3231 of the

Railroad Retirement Tax Act (RRTA) (26 U.S.C. § 3231) contain

essentially the same definition.

A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the

Federal Circuit regarding a claim for refund of taxes under the

RRTA held that a parent corporation which owns a rail carrier

subsidiary is not under common control with the subsidiary within

the meaning of §3231. Union Pacific Corporation v. United States.

5 F. 3d 523 (Fed. Cir., 1993).

BDC 1995-22
-2-

4 Rails Incorporated.

The facts in the Union Pacific case are indistinguishable from 

those presented by 4 Rails. Accordingly, a majority of the Board

finds that 4 Rails, Incorporated is not and has never been an

employer covered by the RRA and the RUIA because it is not under

common control with its rail carrier subsidiary.

An appropriate Form G-215 is attached.

Glen L. Bower

V. M. Speakman, Jr.j^bissentir.g

opinion attached)

Jerome F. Kever

!
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Petrus Lodestijn, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Aqua Society, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          

| | By:    | /s/ Petrus Lodestijn             
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | PETRUS LODESTIJN                 
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | June 22, 2006                    

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### Lawrence B. Auerbach, Appellant-Respondent, v. John B. Taub et al., Respondents-Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.