65378 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by January 11, 2005. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds.

Dated: November 1, 2004. 

James B. Gulliford, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7.

■ Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart Q—Iowa

■ 2. In § 52.820 the table in paragraph (c) 

is amended under chapter 22 by revising 

the entry for ‘‘567–22.1’’ to read as 

follows:

§ 52.820 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

EPA-APPROVED IOWA REGULATIONS

Iowa citation Title State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Commission (567)

* * * * * * * 

Chapter 22—Controlling Pollution

567–22.1 ........ Permits Required for New 

or Existing Stationary 

Sources.

10/8/03 

1/14/04 

11/12/04 [insert FR page 

number where the document begins].

Subrules 22.1(2), 22.1(2) ‘‘g,’’ 22.1(2) ‘‘i’’ have a 

state effective date of 5/23/01. Subrules 22.1(2) 

‘‘u’’ and ‘‘v’’ have a state effective date of 10/8/03 

and subrule 22.1(2) ‘‘w’’ has a state effective date 

of 1/14/04. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 04–24918 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[R05–OAR–2004–IL–0003; FRL–7831–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Illinois; 

Approval of a Site-Specific Sulfur 

Dioxide Plan Revision for CILCO 

Edwards Station

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: On July 29, 2003, Illinois 

submitted a site-specific sulfur dioxide 

(SO2) State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision request for the Central Illinois 

Light Company’s Edwards Generating 

Station in Peoria County, Illinois 

(CILCO Edwards). This revision request 

is identical to an earlier temporary SIP 

revision, which EPA approved on April 

13, 2000 (65 FR 19838). Therefore, EPA 

is approving the July 29, 2003, 

permanent SIP revision request.

DATES: This ‘‘direct final’’ rule is 

effective on January 11, 2005 unless 

EPA receives adverse written comments 

by December 13, 2004. If adverse 

comment is received, EPA will publish 

a timely withdrawal of the rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by Regional Material in 

EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2004–

IL–0003, by one of the following 

methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Agency Web site: http://

docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Regional 

Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s 

electronic public docket and comments 

system, is EPA’s preferred method for 

receiving comments. Once in the 

system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key 

in the appropriate RME Docket 

identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

E-mail: bortzer.jay@epa.gov.

Fax: (312) 886–5824. 

Mail: You may send written 

comments to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 

Air Programs Branch, (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

Hand delivery: Deliver your 

comments to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 

Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office’s normal 

hours of operation. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID 

No. R05–OAR–2004–IL–0003. EPA’s 

policy is that all comments received 

will be included in the public docket 

without change, including any personal 

information provided, unless the 

comment includes information claimed 

to be Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 65379

disclosure is restricted by statute. Do 

not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through Regional Material in 

EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or email. The EPA RME Web site and the 

federal regulations.gov Web site are 

‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through RME or 

regulations.gov, your e-mail address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the public docket and made 

available on the Internet. If you submit 

an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to Section I of 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

of the related proposed rule which is 

published in the Proposed Rules section 

of this Federal Register. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

Regional Material in EDocket (RME) 

index at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/

index.jsp. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in RME or 

in hard copy at Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 

Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. (We 

recommend that you telephone Mary 

Portanova, Environmental Engineer, at 

(312) 353–5954 before visiting the 

Region 5 office.) This Facility is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Portanova, Environmental 

Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air 

Programs Branch, EPA Region 5, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–5954, 

portanova.mary@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

supplementary information is organized 

in the following order:

I. General Information 

A. Does This Action Apply to Me? 

B. How Can I Get Copies of This Document 

and Other Related Information? 

C. How and To Whom Do I Submit 

Comments? 

II. What Action Is Being Taken in This 

Document? 

III. What Has Changed in the Illinois SO2

SIP? 

IV. What Is EPA’s Final Rulemaking Action? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. General Information 

A. Does This Action Apply to Me? 

This action applies to a single source, 

CILCO Edwards Generating Station, in 

Peoria County, IL. 

B. How Can I Get Copies of This 

Document and Other Related 

Information? 

1. The Regional Office has established 

an electronic public rulemaking file 

available for inspection at Regional 

Material in EDocket (RME) under RME 

ID No. R05–OAR–2004–IL–0003, and a 

hard copy file which is available for 

inspection at the Regional Office. The 

official public file consists of the 

documents specifically referenced in 

this action, any public comments 

received, and other information related 

to this action. Although a part of the 

official docket, the public rulemaking 

file does not include Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. The official public 

rulemaking file is the collection of 

materials that is available for public 

viewing at the Air Programs Branch, Air 

and Radiation Division, EPA Region 5, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. EPA requests that if at all 

possible, you contact the person listed 

in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section to schedule your 

inspection. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

excluding Federal holidays. 

2. Electronic Access. You may access 

this Federal Register document 

electronically through the 

regulations.gov Web site located at 

http://www.regulations.gov where you 

can find, review, and submit comments 

on Federal rules that have been 

published in the Federal Register, the 

Government’s legal newspaper, and are 

open for comment. 

For public commenters, it is 

important to note that EPA’s policy is 

that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing at the EPA Regional Office, as 

EPA receives them and without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. When EPA 

identifies a comment containing 

copyrighted material, EPA will provide 

a reference to that material in the 

version of the comment that is placed in 

the official public rulemaking file. The 

entire printed comment, including the 

copyrighted material, will be available 

at the Regional Office for public 

inspection. 

C. How and To Whom Do I Submit 

Comments? 

You may submit comments 

electronically, by mail, or through hand 

delivery/courier. To ensure proper 

receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate 

rulemaking identification number by 

including the text ‘‘Public comment on 

proposed rulemaking Region 5 Air 

Docket ‘‘R05–OAR–2004–IL–0003’’ in 

the subject line on the first page of your 

comment. Please ensure that your 

comments are submitted within the 

specified comment period. Comments 

received after the close of the comment 

period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not 

required to consider these late 

comments. 

For detailed instructions on 

submitting public comments and on 

what to consider as you prepare your 

comments see the ADDRESSES section 

and the section I General Information of 

the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

of the related proposed rule which is 

published in the Proposed Rules section 

of this Federal Register. 

II. What Action Is Being Taken in This 

Document? 

EPA is approving a site-specific 

request to revise Illinois’ SO2 SIP for 

CILCO Edwards in Bartonville, Illinois. 

The requested revision limits the SO2

emissions of the plant’s three boilers. 

On April 15, 1999, the Illinois Pollution 

Control Board (IPCB) granted CILCO 

Edwards a variance to the SO2 emission 

limits of 35 Illinois Administrative Code 

(IAC) 214.141. EPA approved the 

variance on April 13, 2000 (65 FR 

19838). Under the terms of the variance, 

CILCO Edwards could apply to the IPCB 

to convert the variance to a permanent 

site-specific SIP revision. If CILCO 

Edwards chose not to apply for 

permanence, the variance was to expire 

on February 28, 2002. CILCO Edwards 

did apply for permanence, filing its 

petition of site-specific rulemaking with 

the Office of the Clerk of the IPCB on 

April 26, 2002. The Notice of Hearing 

for this petition was filed August 21, 

2002, and the public hearing was held 

on October 11, 2002. The IPCB adopted 

the variance’s emission limits into 35 

65380 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

IAC 214.561, and Illinois submitted this 

rule to the EPA as a SIP revision request 

on July 29, 2003. 

The regulatory language in 35 IAC 

214.561, as published in the Illinois 

Register on July 25, 2003 (27 IR 12101), 

is identical to the language which the 

EPA approved as a SIP revision on April 

13, 2000 (65 FR 19838). Therefore, the 

EPA is relying on the April 13, 2000 

action to support its rulemaking action 

on Illinois’ July 29, 2003 request. For 

further information, please see 65 FR 

19838.

III. What Has Changed in the Illinois 

SO2 SIP? 

This SIP revision request simply 

makes permanent the following SO2

emission limits in the Illinois SIP at 35 

IAC 214.561: CILCO Edwards operates 

three boilers, numbered 1, 2, and 3. The 

average SO2 emissions from Boilers 1, 2, 

and 3, as a group, may not exceed 4.71 

lb/MMBTU actual heat input. 

The average SO2 emissions from any 

one boiler may not exceed 6.6 lb/

MMBTU actual heat input. 

CILCO Edwards must determine 

compliance with these limits on a daily 

basis using the SO2 methodology of the 

Phase II Acid Rain program set forth in 

40 CFR part 75. 

A plantwide SO2 emissions limit for 

CILCO Edwards limits Boilers 1, 2, and 

3, as a group, to 34,613 pounds SO2 per 

hour (lb/hr) on a 24-hour average. 

Compliance with the plantwide limit 

must also be determined on a daily basis 

using the Phase II Acid Rain 

methodology. 

IV. What Is EPA’s Final Rulemaking 

Action? 

EPA is approving the July 29, 2003, 

site-specific SO2 SIP revision request for 

the Central Illinois Light Company’s 

Edwards Generating Station in Peoria 

County, Illinois. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and 

therefore is not subject to review by the 

Office of Management and Budget. 

Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

For the above reason, this action is 

also not subject to Executive Order 

13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

This action merely approves State law 

as meeting Federal requirements and 

imposes no additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by State law. 

Accordingly, the Administrator certifies 

that this rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.). 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

Because this rule approves preexisting requirements under State law 

and does not impose any additional 

enforceable duty beyond that required 

by State law, it does not contain any 

unfunded mandate or significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments, as 

described in the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). 

Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This rule also does not have tribal 

implications because it will not have a 

substantial direct effect on one or more 

Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action also does not have 

Federalism implications because it does 

not have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). This action merely 

approves a State rule implementing a 

Federal standard, and does not alter the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established in the 

Clean Air Act. 

Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

and Safety Risks 

This rule also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it is not 

economically significant. 

National Technology Transfer 

Advancement Act 

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve State choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the 

absence of a prior existing requirement 

for the State to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a SIP submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, 

to use VCS in place of a SIP submission 

that otherwise satisfies the provisions of 

the Clean Air Act. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

This rule does not impose an 

information collection burden under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. Section 804, 

however, exempts from section 801 the 

following types of rules: rules of 

particular applicability; rules relating to 

agency management or personnel; and 

rules of agency organization, procedure, 

or practice that do not substantially 

affect the rights or obligations of non 

agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is 

not required to submit a rule report 

regarding today’s action under section 

801 because this is a rule of particular 

applicability. 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by January 11, 2005. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).)

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 65381

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides.

Dated: October 20, 2004. 

Bharat Mathur, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

■ Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart O—Illinois

■ 2. Section 52.720 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(171) to read as 

follows.

§ 52.720 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * * 

(171) On July 29, 2003, the Illinois 

Environmental Protection Agency 

submitted a site-specific revision to the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) for 

sulfur dioxide (SO2) for the Central 

Illinois Light Company’s E. D. Edwards 

Generating Station in Peoria County, 

Illinois. 

(i) Incorporation by reference. Illinois 

Administrative Code Title 35: 

Environmental Protection, Subtitle B: 

Air Pollution, Chapter 1: Pollution 

Control Board Subchapter C: Emissions 

Standards and Limitations for 

Stationary Sources, Part 214: Sulfur 

Limitations, Subpart X: Utilities Section 

214.561 E.D. Edwards Electric 

Generating Station which was amended 

at 27 Ill. Reg. 12101, effective July 11, 

2003.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 04–24916 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 239 and 258 

[FRL–7836–6] 

Adequacy of Minnesota Municipal 

Solid Waste Landfill Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Removal of immediate final 

rule. 

SUMMARY: Because EPA received 

adverse comment, we are removing the 

immediate final rule for Adequacy of 

Minnesota Municipal Solid Waste 

Landfill Program. We published the 

immediate final rule on September 10, 

2004 (69 FR 54756), approving 

Minnesota’s research, development, and 

demonstration (RD&D) permit 

requirements. We stated in the 

immediate final rule that unless adverse 

comments were received on or before 

October 12, 2004, the final 

determination would be effective on 

November 9, 2004. We subsequently 

received adverse comments on October 

12, 2004. As a result we are publishing 

this notice of removal in the Federal 

Register. We will address the comment 

in a subsequent final action based on 

the parallel proposal also published on 

September 10, 2004 (69 FR 54760).

DATES: As of November 12, 2004, EPA 

removes the immediate final rule 

published on September 10, 2004 (69 FR 

54756).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna Twickler, mailcode DW–8J, 

Waste Management Branch, U.S. EPA 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, telephone (312) 

886–6184, twickler.donna@epa.gov.

Dated: November 3, 2004. 

Norman Niedergang, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

[FR Doc. 04–25095 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 04–3475, MM Docket No. 99–277, RM–

9666] 

Digital Television Broadcast Service; 

Corpus Christi, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission, by this 

document, denies the petitions for 

reconsideration filed by Channel 7 of 

Corpus Christi, Inc. and Minerva L. 

Lopez of the Report and Order, which 

substituted DTV channel 8 for DTV 

channel 47 at Corpus Christi, Texas. See

68 FR 68254, December 8, 2003. With 

this action, this proceeding is 

terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Aronowitz, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s 

Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM 

Docket No. 99–277, adopted October 28, 

2004, and released November 5, 2004. 

The full text of this document is 

available for public inspection and 

copying during regular business hours 

in the FCC Reference Information 

Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Room CY–A257, Washington, DC. This 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 

445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC, 20554, telephone 301–

816–2820, facsimile 301–816–0169, or 

via e-mail joshir@erols.com.

This document does not contain [new 

or modified] information collection 

requirements subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Pub. L. 

104–13. In addition, therefore, it does 

not contain any new or modified 

‘‘information collection burden for 

small business concerns with fewer than 

25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 

Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 

Pub. L. 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

The Commission will send a copy of 

this Memorandum Opinion & Order in 

a report to be sent to Congress and the 

General Accountability Office pursuant 

to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 

U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because there are no 

rules attached. This was a petition for 

reconsideration that was denied.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Digital television broadcasting, 

Television.

Federal Communications Commission. 

Clay C. Pendarvis, 

Associate Chief, Video Division, Media 

Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04–25218 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 04–3473, MB Docket No. 04–281, RM–

11041] 

Digital Television Broadcast Service 

and Television Broadcast Service; 

Mobile, AL

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the 

request of Paxson Communications 

Corporation, substitutes DTV channel 

18 for TV channel 61 at Mobile, 

Alabama. See 69 FR 46476, August 3, 

2004. DTV channel 18 can be allotted to 

Mobile, Alabama, in compliance with