alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 550.407 Termination of payments during evacuation. Advance payments or evacuation payments terminate when the agency determines that— ( a ) The employee is assigned to another duty station outside the evacuation area;
( b ) The employee abandons or is otherwise separated from his or her position;
( c ) The employee's employment is terminated by his or her transfer to retirement rolls or other type of annuity based on cessation of civilian employment;
( d ) The employee resumes his or her duties at the duty station from which he or she was evacuated;
( e ) The agency determines that payments are no longer warranted; or
( f ) The date the employee is determined to be covered by the Missing Persons Act (50 App. U.S.C. 1001 *et seq.*), unless payment is earlier terminated under these regulations.
No. I-08-022 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

April 9, 2008

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

 TO MILLSTONE NUCLEAR PLANT 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have 

selected James Krafty as the new Resident Inspector at Millstone Station in 

Waterford, Conn. He joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Steve Shaffer 

and Resident Inspector Jamie Benjamin at the site. There are two operating 

units at Millstone; Unit 1 is permanently shut down. 

Krafty first joined the NRC in May 2004 as a reactor inspector in the Division of Reactor 

Safety in the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Krafty worked as an engineer for more than 15 years, holding 

various engineering positions with Weyerhauser in Oglethorpe, Ga., Millennium Chemicals in 

Baltimore, O’Neal Engineering in Baltimore, and Archer Daniels Midland in Peoria, Ill. He 

served as a submarine officer in the United States Navy for seven years. 

Krafty earned a bachelor=s degree in mechanical engineering from the United States 

Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md. He is a registered professional engineer. 

AJim Krafty is a good addition to the Millstone inspection team. His technical and 

regulatory experience will assist the NRC in carrying out its mission of protecting people and the 

environment and ensuring the safe operation of nuclear power plants," said NRC Region I 

Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Millstone resident inspectors can be reached at 860/447-3170. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
Board Coverage Decision

2004-09

MGK

MGK service credited under the Acts.

The Board found that MGK was an officer of an employer under 

the Acts for the periods between November 1993 and February 6,

1998.

No Form G-215 Available
B.C.D. 04-9 FEB 20 2004

EMPLOYEE SERVICE DETERMINATION

MGK

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning whether the

services performed by MGK as President of the Eastern Idaho Railroad Company

constituted employee service under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad 

Unemployment Insurance Acts. The Eastern Idaho is and has been a covered employer 

under those Acts since November 21,1993 (BA. No. 2768).

MGK was President of the Eastern Idaho from November 1993 through February 6,

1998. He advises that he was involved in all aspects of railroad operations except

accounting and payroll.

No service was reported for MGK at least through December 1996. MGK raised this

issue with the Board at least as early as March 1998. However, resolution of MGKs’

complaint was delayed, as enforcement of reporting requirements against the owners of

Eastern Idaho was attempted and concluded.

Section 203.2 ofthe Board’s regulations provides that:

An individual shall be an employee whenever (a) he is engaged in

performing compensated service for an employer or (b) he is in an employment

relation to an employer, or (c) he is an employee representative, or (d) he is an

officer of an employer.

The Board finds that MGK was an officer of an employer under the Railroad Retirement

and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts for the period November 1993 through

February 6,1998, and should be credited with service for that period.

Original signed by:

Michael S. Schwartz

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(b)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended.  The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, Statistical Techniques for Clinical Studies.                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 4:20 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mark Czarnolewski, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 8122, MSC 9667, Bethesda, MD 20892-9667, (301) 435-4582,                         *mczarnol@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientific Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2004.

LaVerne Stringfield, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25018  Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
401 P.2d 95

#### James C. BURLESON, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Warden of the New Mexico State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. 7853.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

April 12, 1965.

Edward T. Johnson, Santa Fe, for petitioner.

Harry S. Connelly, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty.^ Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s sentence in Cause No. 4409, Curry County, was increased to life imprisonment because of a determination by a jury in Cause No. 4411 that he had previously been convicted of five felonies within the meaning of § 41-16-1 to 4 N.M.S.A., 1953. He asserts that the increased punishment is void because the determination that he had been previously convicted of other offenses was made in a separately numbered case rather than by supplemental proceedings in Cause No. 4409. Our opinion filed this day in Lott v. Cox, 401 P.2d 93, is controlling and requires denial of the relief sought and the discharge of the Writ of Habeas Corpus heretofore issued in this cause. The petitioner will be remanded to the custody of the Warden of the New Mexico State Penitentiary.

It is so ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

      ( print page 62436)    
This decision is made pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. in Suite 4100W, Franklin Court Building, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

*Docket Number:*                     04-017.                     *Applicant:*                     University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.                     *Instrument:*                     Electron Microscope, Model Technai G2                     TWIN bioTWIN.                     *Manufacturer:*                     FEI Company, Japan.                     *Intended Use:*                     See notice at FR 69, 60395, October 8,2004.                     *Order Date:*                     January 20, 2004.                

*Comments:*                     None received.                     *Decision:*                     Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as the instrument is intended to be used, was being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. Reasons: The foreign instrument is a conventional transmission electron microscope (CTEM) and is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring a CTEM. We know of no CTEM, or any other instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in the United States either at the time of order of the instrument OR at the time of receipt of the application by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.                

Gerald A. Zerdy,

Program Manager, Statutory Import Programs Staff.

[FR Doc. 04-23954 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.220 How does OPM calculate energy utility cost indexes? ( a ) OPM calculates energy utility cost indexes based on the relative cost of maintaining a standard size dwelling in each area at a given ambient temperature and the cost of other energy uses. Although the dwelling size may vary from one COLA survey area to another, OPM compares the utility cost for the same size dwelling in the COLA survey area and the Washington, DC, area.
( b ) OPM applies the following six-step process to compute a cost index(es) for heating and cooling a standard home to a given ambient temperature and to combine the cost index(es) by energy type (e.g., electricity and natural gas) with cost indexes for other energy uses. ( 1 ) *Step 1.* OPM obtains technical information about the requirements by major energy type for heating and cooling a standard size dwelling, built according to current local building practices and codes in each area, given local climatic conditions (e.g., seasonal temperature and humidity). OPM also obtains similar information for use of energy types in other household operations (e.g., hot water, cooking, cleaning, recreation).
( 2 ) *Step 2.* OPM obtains from the shelter survey, a survey of Federal employees, or other appropriate sources, information on dwelling size and the types and prevalence of heating and cooling equipment and energy types (e.g., electricity, gas, and oil) in each area.
( 3 ) *Step 3.* OPM computes estimates of total home energy requirements by energy type attributable to heating and cooling plus all other household energy uses for the COLA survey area and the Washington, DC, area.
( 4 ) *Step 4.* OPM surveys utility prices for each major energy type appropriate to the area.
( 5 ) *Step 5.* OPM combines the above data to produce for each COLA survey area the cost of maintaining the standard size dwelling at a given ambient temperature and the cost of other household energy uses.
( 6 ) *Step 6.* OPM compares the COLA survey area cost with the DC area cost to produce a price index.
FILED

April 16, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt

Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

GEORGE LANGSTON CLARK, ) KNOX CHANCERY

)

Plaintiff/Appellant ) NO. 03A01-9807-CH-00224

)

v. ) HON. H. DAVID CATE

) CHANCELLOR

LINDA LOUISE CLARK, )

)

Defendant/Appellee ) AFFIRMED

J U D G M E N T

This appeal came on to be heard upon the record of the Chancery Court

of Knox County and briefs filed on behalf of the respective parties. Upon

consideration thereof, this Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible

error in the trial court’s judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that the

judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs are assessed to the appellant and

its surety. The case is remanded to the Chancery Court of Knox County for

collection of costs pursuant to applicable law, for which execution may issue if

necessary.

PER CURIAM
# L_2019128EN.01002201.xml

| 16.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 128/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 128/22

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 130/2017

of 7 July 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/737]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/706 of 19 April 2017 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards skin sensitisation and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/706 of 19 April 2017 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards skin sensitisation and repealing Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The 39th indent (Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688) is deleted. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The 39th indent (Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1688) is deleted.

| 2. | The following indent is added:






  — | ‘— | 32017 R 0706: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/706 of 19 April 2017 (OJ L 104, 20.4.2017, p. 8).’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.

The following indent is added:

—

‘—

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/706 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 104, 20.4.2017, p. 8.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 831.1804 Conditions for requesting an offset. An agency may request that money payable from the Fund be offset to recover any valid debt due the United States when all of the following conditions are met: ( a ) The debtor failed to pay all of the debt on demand, or the creditor agency has collected as much as possible from payments due the debtor from the paying agency; and
( b ) The creditor agency sends a debt claim to OPM (under § 831.1805(b) (1), (2), (3), or (4), as appropriate) after doing one of the following: ( 1 ) Obtaining a court judgment for the amount of the debt;
( 2 ) Following the procedures required by 31 U.S.C. 3716 and 4 CFR 102.4;
( 3 ) Following the procedures required by 5 U.S.C. 5514 and § 550.1107 of this title; or
( 4 ) Following the procedures agreed upon by the creditor agency and OPM, if it is excepted by § 831.1805(b)(4) from the completion of procedures prescribed by § 831.1805(b)(3).
### §20212. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be submitted at the same time as the report of the audit required by section 10101 of this title. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Added Pub. L. 105–354, §1(4)(A), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3241.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20212 | 36 App.:5811. | Nov. 18, 1997, Pub. L. 105–85, title XV, §1512, 111 Stat. 1965. |

Section
### §10644. Requirements

#### (a) Training and technical assistance

The rural State shall provide training and technical assistance, including through such groups as the National Crime Prevention Council, to assist local communities in developing Crime Prevention Plans that reflect statewide strategic goals and objectives, and performance targets and measures.

#### (b) Reports

The rural State shall provide a report on its statewide strategic plan to the Attorney General, including information about—

(1) involvement of relevant State-level agencies to assist communities in the development and implementation of their Crime Prevention Plans;

(2) support for local applications for Community Grants; and

(3) community progress toward reducing crime, violence, and substance abuse.

#### (c) Certification

Beginning in the third year of the program, States must certify that the local grantee's project funded under the community grant is generally consistent with statewide strategic goals and objectives, and performance targets and measures.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2988, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11027(b), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1835.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797y–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 4, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00131

- CV

Appellants University of Texas at Austin President Jay Ha rtzell ; University of Texas at Austin R egistrar Mark Simpson; University of Texas Dean of Students Soncia Reagi ns Lilly; Univ er sity of Texa s Regents Kevin Paul Eltife, R. Steven Hicks, Chr istina Mel ton Cr ain, Jodie Lee Jiles, D avid J. Beck, Kelcy L. Warren, Janiece M. Longoria, Nolan Pere z, and James Conrad Weaver, in th eir offic ial capaciti es // Cross

- Appellant, S. O.

v.

Appel lee, S. O.// Cross

- Appellees, University of Texas at Austin President Jay Hartzell ; University of Texas at Austin R egistrar Mark Simpson; University of Texas Dean of Students Soncia Reagi ns - Lilly; Univer sity of Texa s R egents Kevin Paul Eltife, R. Stev en Hicks, Chr istina Melton Cr ain, Jodie Lee Jiles, D avid J. Beck, Kelcy L . Warren, Janiece M. Longoria, Nolan Perez, and James Conrad Weaver, in th eir offic ial capacities

APPEAL FROM THE 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS CO UNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIIN, BAKER, AND KELLY AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on February 11, 2019

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms th e trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant s shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the
undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and President and Chief Financial Officer of New York & Company, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 3, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:
December 13, 2007

| |  | /s/RICHARD P. CRYSTALRichard P. Crystal Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/RONALD W. RISTAURonald W. Ristau President and Chief Financial Officer   

---



QuickLinks
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Joseph Gomez

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00004

- CR & 01

- 20

- 00005

- CR

Trial court case number: 1657519 & 1657521

Trial court: 338th District Court of Harr is County

The motion for rehearing is denied.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau , and Farris.

Date: November 1, 2022