alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GAO-01-1091R Reserve Officers Association of the United States

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

August 21, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Reserve Officers Association of the United States for Fiscal

Year 2000

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Reserve Officers Association of the United States, a federally chartered corporation,

for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000. The corporation’s purpose is to support a

military policy for the United States that will provide adequate national security.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

! present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

! obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

! submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-1091R Reserve Officers Association of the United States

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure
Page 3 GAO-01-1091R Reserve Officers Association of the United States

(194065)
###### Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

#### § 591.217 In which outlets does OPM collect prices?

OPM collects prices in popular outlets in each survey area. OPM selects these outlets based on their proximity to the housing data collection areas, accessibility by road, physical size, advertising, and other characteristics that reflect sales volume. To the extent practical, OPM prices like items in the same types of outlets in the COLA areas and the Washington, DC, area. As warranted, OPM also may conduct point-of-purchase surveys and select outlets based on the results of those surveys.
B.C.D. 00-60

DEC 1 8 2000 EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Mid-Michigan Railroad, Inc. (MMRR) (BA. 4268)

Dallas, Garland & Northeastern Railroad. Inc. (DGNO-Texas) (B.A. 3890)

Dallas, Garland & Northeastern Railroad, Inc. (DGNO-Delaware)

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

status of the above-referenced entities as employers under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231, et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351, et seq.) (RUIA).

As set forth in Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No.33809, decided

October 25, 1999, Railtex, a non-carrier, changed its corporate family structure

by unifying all of its class III railroads into Delaware corporations. This

involved the assignment of the assets of DGNO (Texas) and MMRR. including

the assets of the Texas Northeastern Railroad, a division of MMRR, to DGNO

(Delaware). According to Ms. Kay Acuff, Payroll Supervisor. RailAmenca.1 the

DGNO (Texas) and MMRR assignment of assets to DGNO (Delaware) resulted

in DGNO (Texas) becoming an inactive corporation and MMRR remaining an

active corporation, except that MMRR’s Texas Northeastern Railroad Division

no longer exists as of September 30, 1999, the effective date ofthe assignment.

Ms. Acuff further advised that all employees of the affected entities continue to

perform service except that they are paid under a different federal

identification number.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board under part A of subtitle IV of Title

49, United States Code.

The evidence of record establishes that DGNO (Delaware) is a rail carrier

operating in interstate commerce by virtue of its taking over the operations of

DGNO (Texas), an existing rail carrier employer under the Acts administered

by the Board. Accordingly, it is determined that DGNO (Delaware) became an

employer within the meaning ofsection l(a)(l)(i) of the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. §23 l(a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding provision of the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act effective September 30. 1999, the date the

‘RailAmerica acquired direct control of RailTex and indirect control of

RailTex’s rail carrier subsidiaries by acquisition of all of the common stock of

RailTex. See STB Finance Docket 33813, decided November 3, 1999.

BA#2883
Mid-Michigan Railroad, Inc. (MMRR) (BA. 4268)

Dallas, Garland & Northeastern Railroad, Inc. (DGNO-Texas) (B.A. 3890)

Dallas, Garland & Northeastern Railroad, Inc. (DGNO-Delaware)

assignment became effective. It is also determined that DGNO (Texas) is

terminated as an employer covered under the Acts of September 30, 1999, the

date on which its assets were assigned to DGNO (Delaware). MMRR remains a

covered employer under the Acts since its operations continue to exist.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7836-9]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), EPA gives notice of a meeting of the Gulf of Mexico Program (GMP) Policy Review Board (PRB).

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Thursday, December 2, 2004, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Wyndham New Orleans at Canal Place, 100 Rue Iberville, New Orleans, LA 70130 (504) 566-7006.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, Mail Code EPA/GMPO, Stennis Space Center, MS 39529-6000 at (228) 688-2421.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Proposed agenda topics include: FY 2004 Program Accomplishments; Executive Order Status/Next Steps; Key Ocean Commission Activities Relevant to the Gulf of Mexico; Overview and Status Report on June 2004 Report on Methylmercury in the Gulf of Mexico; Review of Industry-Led Solutions Proposal for Collaborative Gulf Hypoxia Support; Update on GMP Efforts to Help Strengthen Coastal America; Review of FY 2005 GMP Workplan.

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: November 2, 2004.

Gloria D. Car,

Designated Federal Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-25067 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### The People of the State of New York v. Thomas Cully.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
SERVED: JANUARY 25, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF GRANT AVIATION, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1267
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011AL030047) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Ronnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative La Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY**F~deral** 

### Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

### Law Office ofBrentR. Cole, P.C. 821 N Street, Suite 208 Anchorage, AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 ONE COPY



### Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

### Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Alaskan Region Federal Aviation Administration 222 W. 7th Avenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 DMS No
..FAA-2012-1267 ( ivil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, se the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Buil ing-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Alamo Gulf Coast Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of Alamo Gulf Coast Railroad Company (Alamo),

as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231

et sea.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§351 et seq.).

Information regarding Alamo was provided by Sharon L. Burton of

Alamo. According to Ms. Burton, Alamo began doing business May 31,

1996. David L. Wenzel is the chief executive officer of Alamo.

Alamo currently has 22 employees.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket 32855, Alamo filed

a notice of exemption to acquire by lease and operate approximately

5 miles of rail line owned by Southern Pacific Transportation

Company as a shortline company offering switching services and

railcar repair services. It interchanges with Southern Pacific.

The evidence of record establishes that Alamo is a carrier

operating in interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined

that it is an employer within the meaning of section 1(a)(1)(i) of

the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231a (1) (i) ) and the

corresponding provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

effective May 31, 1996, the date as of which it commenced

operations.

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1996-76

BA# 2873
### §41304. Family and domestic violence: data collection and reporting

#### (a) Family violence reporting

Under the authority of section 534 of title 28, the Attorney General shall require, and include in uniform crime reports, data that indicate—

(1) the age of the victim; and

(2) the relationship of the victim to the offender, for crimes of murder, aggravated assault, simple assault, rape, sexual offenses, and offenses against children.

#### (b) National Crime Survey

The Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, through the annual National Crime Survey, shall collect and publish data that more accurately measures the extent of domestic violence in America, especially the physical and sexual abuse of children and the elderly.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated in fiscal years 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1992, such sums as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this section.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7609, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4517.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 534 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2023

NO. 03-22-00471-CR

Bryan Jarett Riepl, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Henry Singleton, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously modified by striking out the additional sentence of thirty days in the workhouse, and as so modified affirmed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### § 550.1632 Hazardous duty pay.

An agent is eligible for hazardous duty pay, subject to the requirements in 5 U.S.C. 5545(d) and subpart I of this part. The agent's rate of basic pay (without any overtime supplement) must be used in computing any hazardous duty pay.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Diagnostic Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, SAM WINER, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  | /s/ Sam Winer                                    
|                   |  | Sam Winer                                        
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
|                   |  | Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# January 2009, Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.206.

Accession Number: ML090230091

Date Released: Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML090220441 - January 2009, Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.206. Cover Memo. (3 page(s), 2/9/2009)
    - ML090220443 - January 2009, Report on the Status of Public Petitions Under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 2.206.  Enclosures. (13 page(s), 2/9/2009)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Quarterly Report of FORE Holdings LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: 1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ David L. Hunt      
|                     |  |     |  | David L. Hunt          
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
FORE Holdings LLC and will be retained by FORE Holdings LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as and exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed as part of
the Form 10-Q.
§ 831.116 Garnishment of payments after disbursement. ( a ) Payments that are covered by 5 U.S.C. 8346(a) and made by direct deposit are subject to 31 CFR part 212, Garnishment of Accounts Containing Federal Benefit Payments.
( b ) This section may be amended only by a rulemaking issued jointly by the Department of the Treasury and the agencies defined as a “benefit agency” in 31 CFR 212.3.
[76 FR 9961, Feb. 23, 2011]
### SUBCHAPTER XXII—SUPPORT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND FAMILIES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 116–32, §2(1), July 25, 2019, 133 Stat. 1036, substituted "SUPPORT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND FAMILIES" for "FAMILY SUPPORT" in subchapter heading.
### SUBCHAPTER III—GRANTS TO STATE COURT SYSTEMS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT IN AUTOMATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF DISPOSITION RECORDS
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                         330 E. Warm Springs
                                         Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                702.257.1984
                                            702.362.0540 fax





March 27, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The  firm  of  G.  Brad  Beckstead,  CPA,  consents  to  the
inclusion  of my report of March 27, 2002, on the  Financial
Statements of Take A Ride, Inc. for the years ended December
31,  2001  and 2000, in its Form 10K-SB filing to  be  filed
with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,




G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
Strafford,

June, 1899.

#### Marston *v.*Strafford Savings Bank *& a.*

Bill in Equity, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure recovered by the defendant bank against the plaintiff. Upon hearing, the bill was dismissed.

*Frank F. Fernald,*for the plaintiff.

*Arthur G. Whittemore*and *John S. H. Frink,*for the defendant bank.

Parsons, J.

The finding of the trial court, that none of the facts upon which the plaintiff relied to sustain her allegation of fraud in the judgment against her were proved, disposes of the questions raised. No question of law has been presented. The only question of law which might have been raised on the facts is settled in *Bergeron*v. *Bank,*62 N. H. 655; *S. C.,*63 N. H. 195.

*Case discharged.*

Wallace and Pike, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §172. Right of priority

The right of priority provided for by subsections (a) through (d) of section 119 shall be six months in the case of designs. The right of priority provided for by section 119(e) shall not apply to designs.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 805; Pub. L. 103–465, title V, §532(c)(2), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4987; Pub. L. 112–29, §§3(g)(1), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 288, 335.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §32, part (R.S. 4887, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1903, ch. 1019, §1, 32 Stat. 1225, 1226, (2) June 19, 1936, ch. 594, 49 Stat. 1529, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 450, §1, 53 Stat. 1212).

This provision is taken from R.S. 4887 (see section 119) and made a separate section.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "119" and after "119(e)".

Pub. L. 112–29, §3(g)(1), struck out "and the time specified in section 102(d)" before "shall be six months".

1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted "subsections (a) through (d) of section 119" for "section 119" and inserted at end "The right of priority provided for by section 119(e) of this title shall not apply to designs."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by section 3(g)(1) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title.

Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–465 effective 6 months after Dec. 8, 1994, and applicable to all patent applications filed in the United States on or after that effective date, with provisions relating to earliest filed patent application, see section 534(b)(1), (3) of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as a note under section 154 of this title.