alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2059

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State of New Mexico as 
          a National Historic Landmark, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORT BAYARD NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK ACT.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Fort Bayard 
National Historic Landmark Act''.
    (b) Designation.--The Fort Bayard Historic District in Grant 
County, New Mexico, as listed on the National Register of Historic 
Places, is hereby designated as the Fort Bayard National Historic 
Landmark.
    (c) Administration.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
administration of the Fort Bayard Historic District by the State of New 
Mexico.
    (d) Cooperative Agreements.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
the State of New Mexico, Grant County, New Mexico, and affected 
subdivisions of Grant County, may enter into cooperative agreements 
with appropriate public or private entities, for the purposes of 
protecting historic resources at Fort Bayard and providing educational 
and interpretive facilities and programs for the public. The Secretary 
shall not enter into any agreement or provide assistance to any 
activity affecting Fort Bayard State Hospital without the concurrence 
of the State of New Mexico.
    (e) Technical and Financial Assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
technical and financial assistance with any entity with which the 
Secretary has entered into a cooperative agreement under subsection 
(d).
    (f) No Effect on Actions of Property Owners.--Designation of the 
Fort Bayard Historic District as a National Historic Landmark shall not 
prohibit any actions which may otherwise be taken by any property 
owners, including the owners of the Fort Bayard National Historic 
Landmark, with respect to their property.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00689

- CR

Julio Jeconiah TORRES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR1303 9

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. No

further extensions absent extenuating c ircum stances. Th e appellant ’ s brief is due on Februa ry

20, 2020.

__ _______________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
NRC MEETING MARCH 31 IN ROCKVILLE, MD., ON PROPOSAL 

TO PRODUCE RADIOISOTOPES AT CLINTON NUCLEAR PLANT 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting at the agency 

headquarters in Rockville, Md., on Tuesday, March 31, to discuss a potential application from 

Exelon for the production of Cobalt-60 at the Clinton Nuclear Power Station. 

Cobalt-60 is a radioactive material licensed by the NRC for applications such as 

commercial irradiators and cancer treatment. The meeting will provide Exelon an opportunity to 

outline its proposal to the agency. The public is invited to observe and will have an opportunity 

to address the staff before the meeting ends. 

 The NRC will hold the meeting from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. in Room E1B15 of the NRC’s 

Executive Boulevard building at 6003 Executive Blvd. in Rockville. The NRC will close a 

portion of the meeting to discuss proprietary information. A teleconference line will also be 

available for members of the public to call in. For more information or to register for the 

meeting, please contact Peter Bamford (301-415-2833 or peter.bamford@nrc.gov) or Stephen 

Sands (301-415-3154 or stephen.sands@nrc.gov). 

### 

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take photos or use a camera to record any portion of a NRC meeting should 

contact the Office of Public Affairs beforehand. 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-054 March 20, 2009
#### Western Bottle Manufacturing Company, Appellee, v. William V. Dufner, Appellant.

Gen. No. 5,868.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. Nicholas E. Worthington, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Western Bottle Manufacturing Company, a corporation, against William V. Dufner to recover the purchase price of certain bottles. The defense interposed'. was that the bottles were not lettered as ordered. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff for $43.52, and from the judgment defendant appeals.

The errors assigned and argued all go in effect to the claim that the verdict is not supported by the law and the evidence, and that the court erred in admitting the testimony of an expert witness.

Clarence W. Heyl, for appellant.

Kirk & Shurtleff, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Sales, § *156*
      ***
      *—when buyer bound to pay for goods by partial acceptance.*In an action for the purchase price of bottles, a defense was interposed that the bottles were not lettered as ordered. There was a conflict in the evidence on that question and the defense was met by evidence, though disputed, that defendant accepted a part of the bottles. The court ruled the law to be that defendant was bound to pay for the whole shipment if it accepted a part. *Held*that ruling was a correct statement of the law.

2. Evidence, § *424*
      ***
      *—when expert evidence as to typewriting admissible.*In an action for the purchase price of bottles, where there was a question whether defendant accepted a part of the *236bottles, and such .acceptance depended upon whether a postscript on a letter written by defendant was a forgery, *held*that the admission of the testimony of a witness familiar with typewriting, to the effect that the postscript was written by the same machine with which the body of the letter was written, was not improper^

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

*235Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney

delivered the opinion of the court.
# L_2020007EN.01000401.xml

| 13.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 7/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 7/4

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Maldives on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Maldives on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 21 September 2006, entered into force on 15 April 2008, in accordance with Article 9(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 15 April 2008.

---
§ 351.503 Length of service. ( a ) All civilian service as a Federal employee, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105(a), is creditable for purposes of this part. Civilian service performed in employment that does not meet the definition of *Federal employee* set forth in 5 U.S.C. 2105(a) is creditable for purposes of this part only if specifically authorized by statute as creditable for retention purposes.
( b ) ( 1 ) As authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3502(a)(A), all active duty in a uniformed service, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2101(3), is creditable for purposes of this part, except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section.
( 2 ) As authorized by 5 U.S.C. 3502(a)(B), a retired member of a uniformed service who is covered by § 351.501(d) is entitled to credit under this part only for: ( i ) The length of time in active service in the Armed Forces during a war, or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign or expedition badge has been authorized; or
( ii ) The total length of time in active service in the Armed Forces if the employee is considered a preference eligible under 5 U.S.C. 2108 and 5 U.S.C. 3501(a), as implemented in § 351.501(d).
( 3 ) An employee may not receive dual service credit for purposes of this part for service performed on active duty in the Armed Forces that was performed during concurrent civilian employment as a Federal employee, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105(a).
( c ) ( 1 ) The agency is responsible for establishing both the service computation date, and the adjusted service computation date, applicable to each employee competing for retention under this part. If applicable, the agency is also responsible for adjusting the service computation date and the adjusted service computation date to withhold retention service credit for noncreditable service.
( 2 ) The service computation date includes all actual creditable service under paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) of this section.
( 3 ) The adjusted service computation date includes all actual creditable service under paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) of this section, and additional retention service credit for performance authorized by § 351.504 (d) and (e).
( d ) The service computation date is computed on the following basis: ( 1 ) The effective date of appointment as a Federal employee under 5 U.S.C. 2105(a) when the employee has no previous creditable service under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section; or if applicable,
( 2 ) The date calculated by subtracting the employee's total previous creditable service under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section from the most recent effective date of appointment as a Federal employee under 5 U.S.C. 2105(a).
( e ) The adjusted service computation date is calculated by subtracting from the date in paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this section the additional service credit for retention authorized by § 351.504(d) and (e).
[64 FR 16800, Apr. 7, 1999; 64 FR 23531, May 3, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 187 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 187

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 
       to allow for the financing of agricultural sales to Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on 
      International Relations and Agriculture, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 
       to allow for the financing of agricultural sales to Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TRADE SANCTIONS REFORM AND EXPORT ENHANCEMENT 
              ACT OF 2000.

     Section 908 of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement 
Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b);
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Prohibition'' and all that 
                follows through ``(1) In general.--'' and inserting 
                ``in General.--'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as subsection 
                (b) (and conforming the margin accordingly); and
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as subsection 
                (c) (and conforming the margin accordingly);
            (3) in subsection (b) (as redesignated), by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)''; and
            (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated), by striking 
        ``paragraph (1)'' and inserting ``subsection (a)''.
                                 <all>
```
### §120112. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, the term "State" includes the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 110–254, §1(a)(2), June 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2421.)
### §12444. Grant conditions

Applicants described in paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) through (6) shall demonstrate that they have entered into a significant partnership with a State, tribal, territorial, or local victim service or advocacy organization or condition in order to develop safe, confidential, and effective protocols, procedures, policies, and systems for protecting personally identifying information of victims.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §41104, as added Pub. L. 109–162, title I, §107, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) through (6), referred to in text, probably mean paragraphs (1) and (3) through (6) of section 12443 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043b–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1972

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclic TMP Formal (CTF). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclic TMP Formal 

(CTF).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CYCLIC TMP FORMAL (CTF). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.06 Cyclic TMP Formal (CAS No. 

5187–23–5) 

(provided for in 

subheading 

2911.00.50) ....... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•HR 1972 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105

MEMO 

SUBJECT: BAAQMD/EPA NSR SIP Submittal Meeting 

FROM: Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer 

 U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Division, Permits Office 

TO: EPA Region 9 Rulemaking File for the BAAQMD NSR SIP Submittal 

On April 28, 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 met 

with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD or District) to discuss the 

District’s revisions to Regulation 2, Rules 1 and 2. The attached agenda contains the topics 

discussed at this meeting. 

Attachment 
BAAQMD/EPA NSR SIP Submittal Meeting 

939 Ellis St. San Francisco, CA 94109 

3rd Floor Main Conference Room 

April 28, 2015 

9:00 – 11:00 AM

AGENDA 

1. Introductions 

2. EPA Schedule 

3. Offsets/ERC Provisions 

4. Other Issues 

5. Clarifications 

6. EPA Proposal Options 

7. Next Steps
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Fowler,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated: April
      11, 2008
            
            
            
            By:
            
            /s/ Michael D.
  FowlerMichael
      D. Fowler
              Interim
      Chief Financial Officer
### §152712. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior calendar year. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1420.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152712 | 36:1511. | Dec. 2, 1980, Pub. L. 96–489, §12, 94 Stat. 2554. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 204 of House Document No. 103–7.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-036 February 26, 2008 

NRC ACCEPTS EPR DESIGN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has accepted for review an application from 

Areva to certify the Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR) design. 

 “We already have a partial application to build and operate an EPR in Maryland, 

and several utilities have told us their applications will be for EPRs,” said Bill Borchardt, 

Director of the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “The staff expects their review work will 

continue at least into 2011.” 

The EPR is a large pressurized water reactor of evolutionary design, with a design 

output of approximately 1,600 megawatts of electricity. Areva filed its application Dec. 

11, 2007, to certify the design, which is currently under construction at the Olkiluoto site 

in Finland and at Flamanville, France. The EPR application, minus proprietary or 

security-related details, is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert/epr.html . Docketing this 

application does not indicate whether the Commission will approve or reject the request. 

The docket number established for this application is 52-020. 

If the NRC certifies the EPR, a company applying for a license to build and 

operate a new nuclear power plant in the United States could choose to use the design and 

reference it in the application. Safety issues resolved within the scope of the design 

certification are not subject to litigation with respect to that individual license application, 

although site-specific design information and environmental impacts associated with 

building and operating the plant at a particular location could be litigated. NRC has 

certified four other standard reactor designs. 

The staff’s technical review will include requests for additional information, as 

needed, and the staff will issue a Safety Evaluation Report after all technical and safety 
questions have been resolved. The NRC would then certify the design through an agency 

rulemaking, which includes an opportunity for public participation. 

 The agency is currently reviewing General Electric’s Economic Simplified 

Boiling Water Reactor and is conducting an acceptance check on an application to certify 

Mistubishi’s US-Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor design. Information about the 

design certification process is available on the NRC Web site here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert.html . The NRC’s regulations 

describe the certification process in Subpart B of Part 52, available on the agency’s Web 

site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part052/ . 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.