December 21, 2006

Terry D. Lindsey, Manager

Department of Human Services, Radiation Protection Services

Oregon State Public Health

800 NE Oregon St.

Portland, Oregon 97232

Dear Mr. Lindsey:

We have reviewed the final revisions to the Oregon Administrative Rules (Div. 333), Radiation

Protection Services, as received by our office on November 7, 2006. These regulations were

reviewed by comparison to the equivalent Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) rules in 10

CFR Parts 19, 20, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 36, 39, 40, 61, 70, 71, and 150; and the requirements of

the 18 amendments identified in the enclosed State Regulation Status (SRS) Data Sheet. We

discussed our review of the regulations with you on December 21, 2006.

As noted in All Agreement States letter STP-05-072, dated September 28, 2005, NRC staff will

continue to hold in abeyance any determination on those rules and compatibility of10 CFR 31.5

and 31.6, if the Agreement State has the essential elements of the NRC’s rule and is more

restrictive than the NRC’s rule.

As a result of our review against the GL Device Rule Compatibility Category B designation, we

have 11 comments as listed in the enclosure. Comments 16, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, and 26

indicate that the State’s regulations are more restrictive than the NRC’s regulations, and there

is no corrective action required for these comments at this time. However, Comments 17, 18,

19, and 23 indicate that the State’s regulations are less restrictive than the NRC’s regulations,

and they need to be addressed in the State’s future rule making process. 

As a result of the remainder of our review, we have 15 comments that have been identified in

the enclosure. Please note that we have limited our review to regulations required for

compatibility and/or health and safety. We have determined that if these regulations are

revised, incorporating our comments and without other significant change, they would meet the

compatibility and health and safety categories established in the Office of State and Tribal

Programs (STP) Procedure SA-200.

We request that when you revise your regulations to address our comments, a copy of the “as

published” regulations be provided to us for review. As requested in STP Procedure SA-201,

“Review of State Regulatory Requirements,” please highlight the location of any changes made

by Oregon, in response to our comments, and provide a copy to Division of Materials Safety

and State Agreements, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management

Programs (FSME) (see letter FSME 06-94 dated October 6, 2006 for further information).

The SRS Data Sheet summarizes our knowledge of the status of other Oregon regulations, as

indicated. Please let us know if you note any inaccuracies, or have any comments on the
Terry Lindsey, Manager -2- December 21, 2006

information contained in the SRS Data Sheet. This letter, including the SRS Data Sheet, is

posted on the FSME website: http://www.hsrd.ornl.gov/nrc/rulemaking.htm. 

If you have any questions regarding the review results, the compatibility and health and safety

categories, or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact Kathleen

Schneider State Regulation Review Coordinator at 301-415-2320 (email: kxs@nrc.gov), William

Rautzen at 301-415-7206 (e-mail: wrr@nrc.gov, ) or Monica Orendi at 301-415-3938 (e-mail:

mlo1@nrc.gov ).

Sincerely,

\RA By S.W. Moore\

Scott W. Moore, Deputy Director

Division of Materials Safety and State Agreements

Office of Federal and State Materials and

Environmental Management Programs

Enclosures: 

As stated
Terry Lindsey, Manager 2 December 21, 2006

 information contained in the SRS Data Sheet. This letter, including the SRS Data Sheet, is

posted on the FSME website: http://www.hsrd.ornl.gov/nrc/rulemaking.htm. 

If you have any questions regarding the review results, the compatibility and health and safety

categories, or any of the NRC regulations used in the review, please contact Kathleen

Schneider State Regulation Review Coordinator at 301-415-2320 (email: kxs@nrc.gov), William

Rautzen at 301-415-7206 (e-mail: wrr@nrc.gov, ) or Monica Orendi at 301-415-3938 (e-mail:

mlo1@nrc.gov ).

Sincerely,

\RA By S.W. Moore\

Scott W. Moore, Deputy Director

Division of Materials Safety and State Agreements

Office of Federal and State Materials and

Environmental Management Programs

Enclosures: As stated

Distribution:

DIR RF (6-281) Sunsi Review Complete

DCD (SP08) : Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available

LMcLean, RSAO : Non-Sensitive G Sensitive

WRautzen, ASPO MOrendi Oregon File ML of Incoming Document: ML063110122

DOCUMENT NAME: C:\FileNet\ML070030381.wpd To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the

box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy

OFFICE SAIS MSEA SAIS OGC MSSA:DD

NAME WRautzen MOrendi KSchneider FCameron SMoore

DATE 11/29/06* 11/29/06* 11/30/06* 12/20/06* 12/21/06*

ML 070030381 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY PKG.ML070030428
COMPATIBILITY COMMENTS ON OREGON FINAL REGULATIONS

STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

1 333-118-0020 71.4 1996-1 B Definitions

It was noted in the January 2003 letter that

Oregon omitted the definition of A1. Oregon,

in it’s response to the comment, stated that it

is found at 333-118-0020(18), their definition

of “Type A Package”. This is only a reference

to A1, and not a definition. Oregon also stated

in their response to the January 2003 letter

that they would add the definition of A1 to their

regulations, but as of this review have not.

Oregon needs to add the definition of A1 to

333-118-0020 to meet the Compatibility

Category B designation assigned to 10 CFR

71.4.

*If Oregon adopts 2004-1 in its entirety these

comments will resolve. Oregon will address

this comment in a December 2006 rule

making.

2 333-118-0020 71.4 1996-1 B Definitions

It was noted in Oregon’s response to the

January 2003 letter that they did not have A2

defined. Oregon also stated in their response

to the January 2003 letter that they would add

the definition of A2 to their regulations, but as

of this review have not.

Oregon needs to add the definition of A2 to

333-118-0020 to meet the Compatibility

Category B designation assigned to 10 CFR

71.4

*If Oregon adopts 2004-1 in its entirety these

comments will resolve. Oregon will address

this comment in a December 2006 rule

making.

3 333-118-0020 71.4 1996-1 B Definitions

It was noted in the January 2003 letter that

Oregon omitted the definition of “Package”. 

Oregon stated in their response to the

January 2003 letter that the definition is split

between 333-118-0020(5), (10), (18), (19),

and (20). The definition of “Package” was

found to be only partially defined over those 5

parts.

Oregon needs to add the definition of

Package to 333-118-0020 to meet the

Compatibility Category B designation

assigned to 10 CFR 71.4.

*If Oregon adopts 2004-1 in its entirety these

comments will resolve. Oregon will address

this comment in a December 2006 rule

making.
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

4 333-102-0010 30.14 N/A B Exempt Concentrations

It was noted in the January 2003 letter that

Oregon omitted sections 10 CFR 30.14 (b)

and (c). Due to confusion over what was

asked to be added to the section, Oregon

stated that 10 CFR 30.14 (c) was the only

requirement that was to be added. As of this

letter, Oregon has not made that update to 

333-102-0010.

Oregon needs to add the Exempt

Concentration requirements to meet the

Compatibility Category B designation

assigned to 10 CFR 30.14(b) and (c).

*Oregon will address this comment in a

December 2006 rule making.

5 333-100-

0005(32)

20.1003 1998-5 A Definitions

It was noted in the January 2003 letter that

Oregon omitted the phrase “the declaration

remains in effect until the declared pregnant

woman withdraws the declaration in writing or

is no longer pregnant” and substituted the

phrase “her employer” for “the licensee”. 

Oregon stated in their response that the

phrase “the declaration remains in effect until

the declared pregnant woman withdraws the

declaration in writing or is no longer pregnant”

was added to the definition, but there was no

change of the phrase “her employer” for “the

licensee”. 

Oregon needs to change the phrase “her

employer” to “the licensee” to 333-100-

0005(32) to meet the Compatibility Category

A designation assigned to 10 CFR 20.1003.

*Oregon will be addressing this issue in a

December rule making.

6 333-120-

0210(2)(b)

20.1502 1998-5 H&S Conditions requiring individual monitoring

of external and internal occupational dose

It was noted in the January 2003 letter that

Oregon omitted the requirements for

monitoring a declared pregnant woman in

333-120-0210(2)(b). Oregon did not address

this part of the comment in their response

letter.

Oregon needs to adopt the essential

objectives of the requirements for monitoring

a declared pregnant woman in 333-120-

0210(2)(b) to meet the Category H&S

designation assigned to section 10 CFR

20.1502.

*Oregon will address this comment in a

December 2006 rule making.
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

7 333-120-0015 20.1003 1997-1 C Definitions

It was noted in the January 2003 letter that

Oregon omitted the definition of “Constraint

(Dose Constraint)”. Oregon stated in their

response to the letter that the definition was

not considered necessary, and might be

addressed in a 2003 rule making. As of this

review, the definition is still omitted.

Oregon needs to adopt the essential

objectives of the definition “Constraint (Dose

Constraint)” in 333-120-0005 to meet the

Compatibility Category C designation

assigned to section 10 CFR 20.1003.

8 105-0530 34.43 1997-5 B January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Training

The State has added the phrase “at least 40

hours” to the training requirements for a

radiographer.

The State needs to remove the reference to

number of hours of training. This section is a

compatibility category “B”. The addition of a

time requirement to this section makes it more

restrictive than 34.43

*Oregon will address this comment in a

December 2006 rule making.

9 100-0005 20.1003 1995-5 A January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Definitions: Occupational Dose and Public

Dose

The State’s updated definitions in 120-0015

are correct and meet compatibility. 

However, the same definitions appear in 100-

0005 and are not updated and do not meet

compatibility.

The State needs to change or delete the

definitions found in 100-0005.

*Oregon is addressing this comment in a

future rule making dated December 2006*

10 120-0015 and

100-0005

20.1003 1998-5 A January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Definitions: Very High Radiation Area

The State has omitted the phrase “from

sources external to the body” in its definition

of high radiation area.

The State needs to add this phrase to achieve

compatibility.

*Oregon will address this comment in a

December 2006 rule making.
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

11 333-118-0190 71.97 1996-1 B January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Advanced Notification of Shipment of

Irradiated Reactor Fuel and Nuclear Waste

The State has substituted the words “nuclear

waste” for “licensed material” in the

requirements of notification of transportation.

This substitution limits the requirements for

notification to just nuclear waste.

The State needs to use the words “licensed

material “ to achieve compatibility. 

*If Oregon adopts 2004-1 in its entirety these

comments will resolve. Oregon will address

this comment in a December 2006 rule

making.

12 333-100-0005 20.1003 1998-5 A January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Definitions: High Radiation Area

The State omitted part of this definition.

The State needs to include all of this definition

to achieve compatibility. 

*Oregon will address this comment in a

December 2006 rule making. 

13 333-118-0150 71.87 1996-1 B January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Routine Determinations

The State has omitted the requirements of

section 71.87 (g) and (k) and also 71.47 (c) &

(d) that is referenced from 71.87 as part of

routine determinations.

The State needs to include these

requirements to achieve compatibility.

*If Oregon adopts 2004-1 in its entirety these

comments will resolve. Oregon will address

this comment in a December 2006 rule

making.

14 333-100-0005 71.4 1996-1 B January 2003 comment not addressed in

this package.

Definitions: Natural Thorium

The States definition is different from 71.4 to

such an extent that it does not meet

compatibility.

The State needs to adopt a definition

compatible to the definition in 71.4.

*If Oregon adopts 2004-1 in its entirety these

comments will resolve. Oregon will address

this comment in a December 2006 rule

making.
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

15 333-113-0501 39.77 2000-1 C Notification of incidents and lost sources;

abandonment procedures for irretrievable

sources

Oregon regulations omitted the requirements

equivalent to 10 CFR 39.77(d)(9) concerning

abandonment procedures for irretrievable

sources.

Oregon needs to adopt the essential

objectives of this section to 333-113-0501 to

meet the Compatibility Category C

designation assigned to Section 10 CFR

39.77(d).

*Oregon will address this comment in a

December 2006 rule making.

16 333-102-

0115(4)(d)

31.5(c)(4) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized 

atmosphere

Oregon regulations require records to be

retained for five years. This is more stringent

than NRC rule requirement of three years.

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule.

17 333-102-

0115(4)(g)

31.5(c)(8) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon regulations omitted the phrase “...by

export as provided by (c)(7) of this section...”. 

Note: 333-102-0115(4)(k) is equivalent to 10

CFR 31.5(c)(7) .

Oregon needs to add the above phrase for

exporting a GL device to 333-102-0115(4)(g)

to meet the Compatibility Category B

designation assigned to 10 CFR 31.5(c)(8). 

18 333-102-

0115(4)(g)(A)

31.5(c)(8)(ii) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon omits the words “... or export...” from

333-102-0115(4)(g)(A).

Oregon needs to add “... or export ...” to 333-

102-005(4)(g)(A) in order to meet the

Compatibility Category B designation

assigned to 10 CFR 31.5(c)(8)(ii).
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

19 333-102-

0115(4)(h)(A)

31.5(c)(9)(I) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon does not indicate that the address for

the transferee be that of the location of use.

Oregon needs to add this requirement to 333-

102-0115(4)(h)(A) to meet the Compatibility

Category B designation assigned to 10

CFR31.5(c)(9)(I). 

20 333-102-

0115(6)

31.5(c)(11) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon regulations omitted the provision

allowing any other specified time period for

responding to written requests.

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule.

21 333-102-

0115(8)

31.5(c)(13) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon regulations require all GL devices to

be registered with the Agency. 

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule.
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

22 333-102-

0115(8)

31.5(c)(13) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon regulations require GL devices

containing more than 370 MBq (10 mCi) of

cesium-137, 3.7 MBq (0.1 mCi) of strontium90, 37 MBq (1 mCi) of cobalt-60, any quantity

of americium-241 or any other transuranic

(i.e., element with atomic number greater than

uranium (92)), to have a specific license. 

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule.

23 333-103-0015 31.5(c)(13)(ii) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon omits requiring the registration

information to be submitted within 30 or as

otherwise indicated on the request and omits

information regarding bankruptcy notification

requirements for devices that meet criteria in

333-102-115(9) (10 CFR 31.5(c)(13)(I)) from

section 333-103-0015.

Oregon needs to add the above to meet the

Compatibility Category B designation

assigned to 10 CFR 31.5(c)(13)(ii).

24 333-102-

0115(10)

31.5(c)(14) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon regulations omitted a provision for

portable devices requiring a report of address

change only if the device’s primary place of

storage has changed. 

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule.
STATE SECTION NRC SECTION RATS ID CATEGORY SUBJECT and COMMENTS

25 333-102-

0115(11)

31.5(c)(15) 2001-1 B Certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or

controlling devices and certain devices for

producing light or an ionized atmosphere

Oregon regulations require generally licensed

devices that are not in use for longer than 2

years must be transferred to an authorized

recipient or disposed of as radioactive waste. 

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule. 

26 333-102-

0247(3)

32.52(c) 2001-1 B Same: material transfer reports and

records

Oregon regulation requires records to be

retained for 5 years. This is more stringent

than NRC rule requirement of three years. 

Oregon’s rule has the essential elements of

the NRC, but is more restrictive than the

NRC’s GL rule. 

As noted in the September 28, 2005 All

Agreement States Letter STP-05-072, the

determination on this provision will be held in

abeyance until such time that the NRC

completes its review and response to the

Organization of Agreement State on

compatibility changes for the GL rule.
STATE REGULATION STATUS

State: Oregon[18 Amendments reviewed identified by an i at Tracking T

the beginning of each equivalent NRC requirement.] Date: Dece

NRC Chronology Identification FR Notice

(State Due Date)

RATS ID

Proposed / Final (F)

Rule / LicCondition(LC) ML 

Safety Requirements for Radiographic Equipment-Part 34 55 FR 843; (1/10/94) 1991-1 F

ML023450

ASNT Certification of Radiographers-Part 34 56 FR 11504; (none) 1991-2 

Standards for Protection Against Radiation-Part 20 56 FR 23360; 56 FR 61352;

57 FR 38588; 57 FR 57877;58 FR 67657; 59 FR 41641;60 FR 20183; (1/1/94)

1991-3 F

ML021970

Notification of Incidents-Parts 20, 30, 31, 34, 39, 40, 70 56 FR 64980; (10/15/94) 1991-4 F

ML023450

Quality Management Program and Misadministrations-Part 35 56 FR 34104; (1/27/95) 1992-1 F

ML023450

Eliminating the Recordkeeping Requirements for Departures from Manufacturer's InstructionsParts 30,35 57 FR 45566; (none) 1992-2 

Decommissioning Recordkeeping and License Termination: Documentation Additions[Restricted areas and spill sites]-Parts 30, 40 

58 FR 39628; (10/25/96) 1993-1 F

ML023450

Licensing and Radiation Safety Requirements for Irradiators-Part 36 58 FR 7715; (7/1/96) 1993-2 F

ML023450

Definition of Land Disposal and Waste Site QA Program-Part 61 58 FR 33886; (7/22/96) 1993-3 Self-Guarantee as an Additional Financial Mechanism-Parts 30, 40, 70 58 FR 68726; 59 FR 1618;

(none)

1994-1 

Uranium Mill Tailings Regulations: Conforming NRC Requirements to EPA Standards-Part 40 59 FR 28220; (7/1/97) 1994-2 Timeliness in Decommissioning Material Facilities-Parts 30, 40, 70 59 FR 36026; (8/15/97) 1994-3 F

ML023450

Preparation, Transfer for Commercial Distribution, and Use of Byproduct Material for MedicalUse-Parts 30, 32, 35

59 FR 61767; 59 FR 65243;60 FR 322; (1/1/98)

1995-1 F

ML023450

Frequency of Medical Examinations for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment-Part 20 60 FR 7900; (3/13/98) 1995-2 
NRC Chronology Identification FR Notice

(State Due Date)

RATS ID

Proposed / Final (F)

Rule / LicCondition(LC) ML 

iLow-Level Waste Shipment Manifest Information and Reporting-Parts 20, 61 60 FR 15649; 60 FR 25983;

(3/1/98)

1995-3 F

ML063110

Performance Requirements for Radiography Equipment-Part 34 60 FR 28323; (6/30/98) 1995-4 F

ML023450

iRadiation Protection Requirements: Amended Definitions and Criteria-Parts 19, 20 60 FR 36038; (8/14/98) 1995-5 F

ML063110

iClarification of Decommissioning Funding Requirements-Parts 30, 40, 70 60 FR 38235; (11/24/98) 1995-6 F

ML063110

iMedical Administration of Radiation and Radioactive Materials-Parts 20, 35 60 FR 48623; (10/20/98) 1995-7 F

ML063110

i10 CFR Part 71: Compatibility with the International Atomic Energy Agency-Part 71 60 FR 50248; 61 FR 28724;

(4/1/99)

1996-1 F

ML063110

One Time Extension of Certain Byproduct, Source and Special Nuclear Materials LicensesParts 30, 40, 70 61 FR 1109; (none) 1996-2 Termination or Transfer of Licensed Activities: Recordkeeping Requirements-Parts 20, 30, 40,61, 70

61 FR 24669; (6/17/99) 1996-3 F

ML023450

iResolution of Dual Regulation of Airborne Effluents of Radioactive Materials; Clean Air ActPart 20 61 FR 65120; (1/9/00) 1997-1 FML063110

Recognition of Agreement State Licenses in Areas Under Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction Within

an Agreement State-Part 150

62 FR 1662; (2/27/00) 1997-2 F

ML023450

Criteria for the Release of Individuals Administered Radioactive Material-Parts 20, 35 62 FR 4120; (5/29/00) 1997-3 F

ML023450

Fissile Material Shipments and Exemptions-Part 71 62 FR 5907; (none) 1997-4 

iLicenses for Industrial Radiography and Radiation Safety Requirements for Industrial

Radiography Operations-Parts 30, 34, 71, 150

62 FR 28947; (6/27/00) 1997-5 F

ML063110
NRC Chronology Identification FR Notice

(State Due Date)

RATS ID

Proposed / Final (F)

Rule / LicCondition(LC) ML 

Radiological Criteria for License Termination-Parts 20, 30, 40, 70 62 FR 39057; (8/20/00) 1997-6 F

ML023450

iExempt Distribution of a Radioactive Drug Containing One Microcurie of Carbon-14 UreaPart 30 62 FR 63634; (1/02/01) 1997-7 FML063110Deliberate Misconduct by Unlicensed Persons-Parts 30, 40, 61, 70, 71, 150 63 FR 1890; 63 FR 13773;

(2/12/01)

1998-1 F

ML023450

Self-Guarantee of Decommissioning Funding by Nonprofit and Non-Bond-Issuing LicenseesParts 30, 40, 70 63 FR 29535; (none) 1998-2 License Term for Medical Use Licenses-Part 35 63 FR 31604; (none) 1998-3 Licenses for Industrial Radiography and Radiation Safety Requirements for IndustrialRadiographic Operations-Part 34

63 FR 37059; (7/9/01) 1998-4 F

ML023450

iMinor Corrections, Clarifying Changes, and a Minor Policy Change-Parts 20 63 FR 39477; 63 FR 45393;

(10/26/01)

1998-5 F

ML063110

iTransfer for Disposal and Manifests: Minor Technical Conforming Amendment-Part 20 63 FR 50127; (11/20/01) 1998-6 F

ML063110

Radiological Criteria for License Termination of Uranium Recovery Facilities-Part 40 64 FR 17506; (6/11/02) 1999-1 

Requirements for Those Who Possess Certain Industrial Devices Containing ByproductMaterial to Provide Requested Information-Part 31

64 FR 42269; (none) 1999-2 

Respiratory Protection and Controls to Restrict Internal Exposure-Part 20 64 FR 54543; 64 FR 55524;

(2/2/03)

1999-3 P

ML061020

iEnergy Compensation Sources for Well Logging and Other Regulatory Clarifications-Part 39 65 FR 20337; (5/17/03) 2000-1 F

ML063110

iNew Dosimetry Technology-Parts 34, 36, 39 65 FR 63750; (1/8/04) 2000-2 F

ML063110

iRequirements for Certain Generally Licensed Industrial Devices Containing ByproductMaterial - Parts 30, 31, 32

65 FR 79162; (2/16/04) 2001-1 F

ML063110
NRC Chronology Identification FR Notice

(State Due Date)

RATS ID

Proposed / Final (F)

Rule / LicCondition(LC) ML 

1. Or other generic Legally Binding Requirements.2. (Y/N) Y means “Yes,” there are comments in the review letter that the State needs to address. 

N means “No,” there are no comments in the review letter.

3. Not required means these regulations are not required for purposes of compatibility.4. A State need not adopt a specific regulation if the State has no licensees that would be subject to that regulation. See: “Final 

Adequacy and Compatibility of Agreement State Programs,” III.1. Time Frame for Adoption of Compatible State Regulations, p

1995.

5. ADAMS ML Number6. By letter dated September 2, 2005, from Paul H. Lohaus, Director, Office of State and Tribal Programs, Agreement States were 

legally binding requirements satisfying the requirements of NRC Order EA-05-090.

iRevision of the Skin Dose Limit -Part 20 67 FR 16298; 4/5/05 2002-1 F

ML063110

iMedical Use of Byproduct Material-Parts 20, 32, and 35 67 FR 20249; 4/24/05 2002-2 F

ML063110

iFinancial Assurance for Materials Licensees – Parts 30, 40, 70 68 FR 57327; (12/3/06) 2003-1 F

ML063110

Compatibility With IAEA Transportation Safety Standards and Other Transportation SafetyAmendments – Part 71

69 FR 3697; (10/01/07) 2004-1

iSecurity Requirements for Portable Gauges Containing Byproduct Material - Part 30 70 FR 2001; (7/11/08) 2005-1 F

ML063110

iMedical Use of Byproduct Material - Recognition of Specialty Boards - Part 35 70 FR 16336; 71 FR 1926

(4/29/08)

2005-2 F

ML063110

Increased Controls for Risk-Significant Radioactive Sources (NRC Order EA-05-090)6 70 FR 72128; (12/1/05) 2005-3 LC

ML052870

Minor Amendments - Part 20,30,32,35,40 and 70 71FR15005 (3/27/09) 2006-1