Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2018 / Notices 65349 

4See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

5See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

6 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

7See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 

8103. See also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

8See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 32629, 32630 (July 13, 

2018). 

the issue, (2) a brief summary of the 

argument, and (3) a table of authorities.4

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, must submit a written request 

to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via ACCESS. An 

electronically filed document must be 

received successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.5 Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any written briefs, 

not later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

If a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is above de minimis in 

the final results of this review, we will 

calculate an importer-specific 

assessment rate based on the ratio of the 

total amount of dumping calculated for 

each importer’s examined sales and the 

total entered value of the sales in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).6

If a respondent’s weighted-average 

dumping margin or an importer-specific 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis in 

the final results of review, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties in accordance with 

the Final Modification for Reviews.7 The 

final results of this administrative 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise under review 

and for future deposits of estimated 

duties, where applicable. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review produced by 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. or Hyundai 

Steel Company for which they did not 

know their merchandise was destined 

for the United States, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 

the all-others rate if there is no rate for 

the intermediate company(ies) involved 

in the transaction. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements for estimated antidumping 

duties will be effective upon publication 

of the notice of final results of this 

review for all shipments of CTL plate 

from Korea entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication as provided by 

section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for companies subject to 

this review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

companies not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation but the producer 

is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment for the producer of 

the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 0.98 percent,8 the 

all-others rate established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation, adjusted 

for the export-subsidy rate in the 

companion countervailing duty 

investigation. 

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this period 

of review. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: December 14, 2018. 

Gary Taverman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

performing the non-exclusive functions and 

duties of the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

A. Comparisons to Normal Value 

1. Determination of Comparison Method 

2. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

B. Product Comparisons 

C. Date of Sale 

D. Level of Trade/CEP Offset 

E. Affiliated Service Providers 

F. Export Price and Constructed Export 

Price 

1. Dongkuk 

2. Hyundai Steel 

G. Normal Value 

1. Overrun Sales 

2. Selection of Comparison Market 

3. Affiliated Parties 

4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test 

5. Cost of Production 

6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on 

Comparison Market Prices 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2018–27536 Filed 12–19–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Limitation of Duty-Free Imports of 

Apparel Articles Assembled in Haiti 

Under the Caribbean Basin Economic 

Recovery Act (CBERA), as Amended 

by the Haitian Hemispheric 

Opportunity Through Partnership 

Encouragement Act (HOPE) 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notification of Annual 

Quantitative Limit on Imports of Certain 

Apparel from Haiti. 

SUMMARY: CBERA, as amended, 

provides duty-free treatment for certain 

apparel articles imported directly from 

Haiti. One of the preferences is known 

as the ‘‘value-added’’ provision, which 

requires that apparel meet a minimum 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
65350 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2018 / Notices 

threshold percentage of value added in 

Haiti, the United States, and/or certain 

beneficiary countries. The provision is 

subject to a quantitative limitation, 

which is calculated as a percentage of 

total apparel imports into the United 

States for each 12-month annual period. 

For the annual period from December 

20, 2018 through December 19, 2019, 

the quantity of imports eligible for 

preferential treatment under the valueadded provision is 372,889,066 square 

meters equivalent. 

DATES: Applicable Date: December 20, 

2018. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurie Mease, International Trade 

Specialist, Office of Textiles and 

Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

(202) 482–2043. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: Section 213A of the 

Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act 

(19 U.S.C. 2703a) (‘‘CBERA’’), as 

amended; and as implemented by 

Presidential Proc. No. 8114, 72 FR 

13655 (March 22, 2007), and No. 8596, 

75 FR 68153 (November 4, 2010). 

Background: Section 213A(b)(1)(B) of 

CBERA, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

2703a(b)(1)(B)), outlines the 

requirements for certain apparel articles 

imported directly from Haiti to qualify 

for duty-free treatment under a ‘‘valueadded’’ provision. In order to qualify for 

duty-free treatment, apparel articles 

must be wholly assembled, or knit-toshape, in Haiti from any combination of 

fabrics, fabric components, components 

knit-to-shape, and yarns, as long as the 

sum of the cost or value of materials 

produced in Haiti or one or more 

beneficiary countries, as described in 

CBERA, as amended, or any 

combination thereof, plus the direct 

costs of processing operations 

performed in Haiti or one or more 

beneficiary countries, as described in 

CBERA, as amended, or any 

combination thereof, is not less than an 

applicable percentage of the declared 

customs value of such apparel articles. 

Pursuant to CBERA, as amended, the 

applicable percentage for the period 

December 20, 2018 through December 

19, 2019, is 60 percent. 

For every twelve-month period 

following the effective date of CBERA, 

as amended, duty-free treatment under 

the value-added provision is subject to 

a quantitative limitation. CBERA, as 

amended, provides that the quantitative 

limitation will be recalculated for each 

subsequent 12-month period. Section 

213A (b)(1)(C) of CBERA, as amended 

(19 U.S.C. 2703a(b)(1)(C)), requires that, 

for the twelve-month period beginning 

on December 20, 2018, the quantitative 

limitation for qualifying apparel 

imported from Haiti under the valueadded provision will be an amount 

equivalent to 1.25 percent of the 

aggregate square meter equivalent of all 

apparel articles imported into the 

United States in the most recent 12- 

month period for which data are 

available. The aggregate square meters 

equivalent of all apparel articles 

imported into the United States is 

derived from the set of Harmonized 

System lines listed in the Annex to the 

World Trade Organization Agreement 

on Textiles and Clothing (‘‘ATC’’), and 

the conversion factors for units of 

measure into square meter equivalents 

used by the United States in 

implementing the ATC. For purposes of 

this notice, the most recent 12-month 

period for which data are available as of 

December 20, 2018 is the 12-month 

period ending on October 31, 2018. 

Therefore, for the one-year period 

beginning on December 20, 2018 and 

extending through December 19, 2019, 

the quantity of imports eligible for 

preferential treatment under the valueadded provision is 372,889,066 square 

meters equivalent. Apparel articles 

entered in excess of these quantities will 

be subject to otherwise applicable 

tariffs. 

Terry K. Labat, 

Senior Advisor, performing the Non-Exclusive 

Duties of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Textiles, Consumer Goods and Materials. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27494 Filed 12–19–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DOD–2018–HA–0102] 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, 

DoD. 

ACTION: Information collection notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Uniformed Services University of the 

Health Sciences announces a proposed 

public information collection and seeks 

public comment on the provisions 

thereof. Comments are invited on: 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of 

the burden of the proposed information 

collection; ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and ways to minimize the 

burden of the information collection on 

respondents, including through the use 

of automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by February 19, 

2019. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Mail: Department of Defense, Office of 

the Chief Management Officer, 

Directorate for Oversight and 

Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 

Mailbox #24 Suite 08D09, Alexandria, 

VA 22350–1700. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request more information on this 

proposed information collection or to 

obtain a copy of the proposal and 

associated collection instruments, 

please write to the Office of Regulatory 

Affairs and Research Compliance, Henry 

M. Jackson Foundation for the 

Advancement of Military Medicine 

(HJF), ATTN: Sandra SamayoaKozlowsky, Regulatory Affairs 

Assistant, 6720A Rockledge Drive, Suite 

100, Bethesda, MD 20817 or call the HJF 

Office of Regulatory Affairs at (240) 

694–2121. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title; Associated Form; and OMB 

Number: Comparing Hospital Hand 

Hygiene in Liberia: Soap, Alcohol, and 

Hypochlorite; OMB Control Number 

0720–XXXX. 

Needs and Uses: This information 

collection is necessary to conduct 

research as part of a U.S.-Liberia 

collaboration funded by the U.S. 

Department of Defense Center for Global 

Health Engagement. The study 

objectives are to determine the most 

appropriate cleansing material (soap, 

alcohol, or hypochlorite/chlorine 

solution) for routine hand hygiene in 

Liberian healthcare facilities and to 

determine how best to implement hand 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES