alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Manchester Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

  1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 22, 2004


/s/ Jackson Buch
---------------------------------------
Jackson Buch, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6754

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RANDOLPH CROCKER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-95-52)

Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 26, 1999

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randolph Crocker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Crocker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for transcripts under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994)

and to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Crocker, No. CR-95-52 (E.D. Va. May 24, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 838.304 Providing for payment to the former spouse. ( a ) A court order directed at employee annuity is not a court order acceptable for processing unless it provides for OPM to pay the former spouse a portion of an employee annuity as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) To provide for OPM to pay the former spouse a portion of an employee annuity as required by paragraph (a) of this section the court order must— ( 1 ) Expressly direct OPM to pay the former spouse directly;
( 2 ) Direct the retiree to arrange or to execute forms for OPM to pay the former spouse directly; or
( 3 ) Be silent concerning who is to pay the portion of the employee annuity awarded to the former spouse.
( c ) Except when the court order directed at employee annuity contains a provision described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a court order directed at employee annuity that instructs the retiree to pay a portion of the employee annuity to the former spouse is not a court order acceptable for processing.
( d ) Although paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section provide acceptable methods for satisfying the requirement that a court order directed at employee annuity provide for OPM to pay the former spouse, OPM strongly recommends that any court order directed at employee annuity expressly direct OPM to pay the former spouse directly.
Board Coverage Decision

1995-10

Denver Rock Island Railroad Company

Name Change - Effective September 1, 1994

Denver Terminal Railroad Company 

has changed its name to

Denver Rock Island Railroad Company

No Decision Published

BA # 3786
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT
PARV INDE R SING H ; K AW AL JE E T K AUR SACH DE V A; JAPNE E T SING H , Pe titione rs,
v. E RIC H . H O L DE R, Jr ., Attor ne y G e ne r al, R

e sponde nt . No. 10-71489 Age n c y Nos. A099-873-204

A099-873-205 A099-873-206
M E M O RANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

April 8, 2014 * * Se attle , W a s hington B e fore : K O Z INSKI , C hie f Judge , RAW L INSO N and B E A , C irc uit Judge s. The B IA didn’ t e rr in a dopting the im m igration judge ’ s a dve rse c re dibility finding. Theim

m igration judgeliste d “ spe c ific insta nc e s in there c ord tha

t 

# FIL E D
APR 15 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).pa ge 2

form [e d] the ba sis of the. . . a dve rse c re d ibility de te rm ination,” Shre stha v. Holde r, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th C ir. 2010), inc luding Singh’ s volunta ry re turn to India , disc re pa

nc i e s be twe e n the a ffidavits of Singh a nd his fa the r, and pe titione rs’ inc o nsiste nt te s tim ony

re ga rding the ir pla c e of re s ide nc e an d visa a pplic ation proc e s s. Nothing in the

re c ord “ c om

pe ls a c ontra ry c onc lusion.”Singh v. Gonz a le s, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th C ir. 2006).
DE NIE D.
Exhibit 3.4

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC.


     The undersigned, Tag-It Pacific, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
organized and existing by virtue of the General Corporation Law (the "GCL") of
the State of Delaware, does hereby certify as to the following:

1.   The name of the Corporation is Tag-It Pacific, Inc. The original
     Certificate of Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the
     State of Delaware on September 30, 1997.

2.   That by unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors of the
     Corporation in accordance with Section 141(f) of the GCL, resolutions were
     adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of
     Incorporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and requiring that
     said amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for
     approval. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
     follows:

          "RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be
          amended by changing the first paragraph of Article IV so that as
          amended the first paragraph of said Article shall read as follows:

          "This Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares,
          designated, respectively, "Preferred Stock" and "Common Stock." Each
          class of stock shall have a par value of $.001 per share. The number
          of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is 3,000,000 and
          the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is
          30,000,000."

3.   That thereafter, pursuant to resolution by the Board of Directors of the
     Corporation, the aforesaid Amendment was duly submitted to the stockholders
     of the Corporation. Said Amendment was duly adopted at a meeting of the
     stockholders of the Corporation held on July 1, 1999.

4.   Said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
     Section 242 of the GCL.


<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation this 7th day of July, 1999.


                                       TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC.


                                        By:  /S/ COLIN DYNE
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Colin Dyne
                                             Its: Chief Executive Officer


                                     Page 2
### §200307. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Political Activities.—The corporation or an officer or agent as such may not contribute to, support, or assist a political party or candidate for public office.

(c) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, an officer or member during the life of the corporation or on its dissolution or final liquidation. This subsection does not prevent the payment of compensation to an officer or reimbursement for actual necessary expenses in amounts approved by the council of administration of the corporation.

(d) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan or advance to an officer or employee. Members of the council of administration who vote for or assent to making a loan or advance to an officer or employee, and officers who participate in making the loan or advance, are jointly and severally liable to the corporation for the amount of the loan or advance until it is repaid.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1454.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200307(a) | 36:543. | Aug. 20, 1954, ch. 774, §§10, 11, 13, 68 Stat. 751. |
| 200307(b) | 36:541. | |
| 200307(c) | 36:540(a). | |
| 200307(d) | 36:540(b). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title. The words "This subsection does not prevent" are substituted for "Nothing in this subsection, however, shall be construed to prevent" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (d), the words "or advance" are added in 2 places for consistency in the subsection.
Exhibit 10.05.3


 


Second
Amendment to the Citigroup Inc. Amended and Restated Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”)


(effective as of December 16, 2003)





 


 


1.                                       Subparagraph (b) of Section 7 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced with the
following:


 


(b) At the end of each
calendar quarter, there shall be credited to the Director’s Account an amount
equal to the cash dividends that would have been paid on the number of shares
of Common Stock credited to the Director’s Account as of the dividend record
date, if any, occurring during such calendar quarter as if such shares had been
shares of issued and outstanding Common Stock on such record date, and at the
Director’s election, made in the manner described in Section 5(a) above, such
amounts shall be either distributed in cash to the Director or treated as
reinvested in additional shares of Common Stock on the dividend payment date.


 


2.                                       Except as specifically modified herein,
all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in their capacity as an officer of
Oregon Pacific Bancorp (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of his knowledge:

     o    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
          March 31, 2005, (the "Report"), which this certification accompanies,
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2005


 /s/ Thomas K. Grove
--------------------------------------
 Thomas K. Grove

 President and Chief Executive Officer

 /s/ Joanne Forsberg
--------------------------------------
 Joanne Forsberg
 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

                                       22
### §296. Liability of States, instrumentalities of States, and State officials for infringement of patents

(a) In General.—Any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any officer or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his official capacity, shall not be immune, under the eleventh amendment of the Constitution of the United States or under any other doctrine of sovereign immunity, from suit in Federal court by any person, including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, for infringement of a patent under section 271, or for any other violation under this title.

(b) Remedies.—In a suit described in subsection (a) for a violation described in that subsection, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for the violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in a suit against any private entity. Such remedies include damages, interest, costs, and treble damages under section 284, attorney fees under section 285, and the additional remedy for infringement of design patents under section 289.

(Added Pub. L. 102–560, §2(a)(2), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Constitutionality

For information regarding the constitutionality of this section, as added by section 2(a)(2) of Pub. L. 102–560, see the Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court on the Constitution Annotated website, constitution.congress.gov.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective with respect to violations that occur on or after Oct. 28, 1992, see section 4 of Pub. L. 102–560, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 2541 of Title 7, Agriculture.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Waterworks, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 24, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Harry K. Hornish, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Harry K. Hornish, Jr.Harry K. Hornish, Jr.President and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 29, 2004
 A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
National Waterworks, Inc. and will be retained by National Waterworks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request. 21
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Manchester Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October 15, 2004





/s/ Paul Minichiello

---------------------------------------

Paul Minichiello, President and C.E.O.

(Principal Executive Officer)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 05-166 December 8, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, DEC. 13-15

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will

meet Dec. 13-15 in Rockville, Md., to continue to discuss, among other items, the NRC’s plans for the

implementation of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) dose standard for the proposed

geologic repository at Yucca Mountain after 10,000 years. The committee will continue its discussions

with NRC staff from the Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards and be briefed on the

subjects of radionuclide inventory, and the effects of climate change and dosimetry, which are

addressed in the EPA dose standard.

The committee reports to and advises the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management.

The sessions on Tuesday and Wednesday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. The session on

Thursday will run from 10 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. 

Anyone wanting to use video teleconferencing to observe the meeting should contact Theron

Brown, at 301-415-8066 at least five days before the meeting to ensure availability.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2005/ . Individuals interesting in making

statements or those seeking more information should contact Sharon Steele, at 301-415-6805. 

###
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-030-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

-y- io - i202.

FDMS Docket No. FAA-200-

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALP1\., etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date

Boeing Sadayoshi Takara 7113/2010

ATA Mark Lopez 7/21/2010

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verily That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
## Item Check

Takeoff and landing area scouted and clear of obstacles Laptop battery sufficiently charged USB radio plugged in Antenna mounted high w/ clear view Virtual Cockpit correct maps UAV comms connected to right UAV

Takeoff waypoint into the wind, clear of obstacles Landing waypoint surveyed by UAV at landing spot Rally waypoint 1000 ft. glide path, clear of obstacles Area waypoint(s) set correct altitudeand overlap Upload to UAV click flashing red button (upper right) Start camera payload verify running

Pogo-pins undamaged Locator beacon installed, turned ON (optional) Pitot tube extended straight, clear of debris Propeller / spinner spins freely, no rattle Propellers no chips >1mm Propellers light friction Battery installed securely Wings Secure Forehead check elevons still move when wing is flexed

GPS lock min 7 sats, GPS quality values GREEN Top status "lights" all GREEN Artifical horizon all GREEN point UAV North, East, South, West verify "Mag" reading and airplane icon Pitch/Roll check verify correct response, < 1 second delay Pitot finger test airspeed >20 mph for 3 seconds Shield pitot airspeed 0 +/- 5mph [Zero Press.] button verify altitude 0 +/- 5 ft. [GPS Home]button verify Home location moves to aircraft [Check Sensors]button passed, verify heading within 5 degrees

Battery charge level > 95% [Motor Arm]button WARNING MOTOR ARMED [Take Off] button verify countdown starts Launch directly into wind 

# sentera Phoenix A1, Phoenix M1, Vireo 

# Pre-Flight Checklist

Field Set-up

Flight plan

Mechancical Assembly

Sensors

Launch
### §10332. Description of grant program

The Director is authorized to make grants to provide equipment and personnel training for the closed-circuit televising and video taping of the testimony of children in criminal proceedings for the violation of laws relating to the abuse of children.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1402, as added Pub. L. 101–647, title II, §241(a)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4810; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40156(c)(2), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1923.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796aa–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 struck out "to States, for the use of States and units of local government in the States" after "make grants".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Effective Aug. 1, 2000, all functions of Director of Bureau of Justice Assistance, other than those enumerated in section 10142(3) to (6) of this title, transferred to Assistant Attorney General for Office of Justice Programs, see section 1000(a)(1) [title I, §108(b)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 10141 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Kirk
Billingsley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.



                                          /s/ L. KIRK BILLINGSLEY
                                          -----------------------
                                          L. Kirk Billingsley
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          August 4, 2005