alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  quarterly  Report of CCP  Worldwide,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
David R. Allison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ David R. Allison
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer


June 3, 2004
### §359. Rules and regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations as are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purposes of this chapter, which rules and regulations shall be the same as those prescribed under the mineral leasing laws to the extent that they are applicable.

(Aug. 7, 1947, ch. 513, §10, 61 Stat. 915.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of "mineral leasing laws", see section 351 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of the Interior to promulgate regulations under this chapter relating to fostering of competition for Federal leases, implementation of alternative bidding systems authorized for award of Federal leases, establishment of diligence requirements for operations conducted on Federal leases, setting of rates for production of Federal leases, and specifying of procedures, terms, and conditions for acquisition and disposition of Federal royalty interests taken in kind, transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(b) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. Section 7152(b) of Title 42 was repealed by Pub. L. 97–100, title II, §201, Dec. 23, 1981, 95 Stat. 1407, and functions of Secretary of Energy returned to Secretary of the Interior. See House Report No. 97–315, pp. 25, 26, Nov. 5, 1981.
### §21902. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation include—

(1) the presentation of theatrical productions of the highest type;

(2) the stimulation of public interest in the drama as an art belonging both to the theater and to literature and to be enjoyed both on the stage and in the study;

(3) the advancement of interest in the drama throughout the United States by furthering the production of the best plays, interpreted by the best actors at a minimum cost;

(4) the further development of the study of drama of the present and past in our universities, colleges, schools, and elsewhere; and

(5) the sponsoring, encouraging, and developing of the art and technique of the theater through a school within the National Academy.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1298.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21902 | 36:3302 (last sentence). | July 5, 1935, ch. 373, §2 (last sentence), 49 Stat. 458. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "include" is substituted for "shall embrace" for consistency in the revised title.

In clause (3), the words "of America" are omitted as unnecessary.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

AT ROAD, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of At Road, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas C. Hoster,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Thomas C. Hoster    | 
|                        | 
|Thomas C. Hoster        | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 31, 2003          |
### §12431. Task force

#### (a) Establish

The Attorney General, in consultation with national nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations whose primary expertise is in domestic violence, shall establish a task force to coordinate research on domestic violence and to report to Congress on any overlapping or duplication of efforts on domestic violence issues. The task force shall be comprised of representatives from all Federal agencies that fund such research.

#### (b) Uses of funds

Funds appropriated under this section shall be used to—

(1) develop a coordinated strategy to strengthen research focused on domestic violence education, prevention, and intervention strategies;

(2) track and report all Federal research and expenditures on domestic violence; and

(3) identify gaps and duplication of efforts in domestic violence research and governmental expenditures on domestic violence issues.

#### (c) Report

The Task Force shall report to Congress annually on its work under subsection (b).

#### (d) Definition

For purposes of this section, the term "domestic violence" has the meaning given such term by section 10447 1 of this title.

#### (e) Authorization of Appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2004.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40901, as added Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title IV, §1407, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1517.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 10447 of this title, referred to in subsec. (d), was subsequently repealed and a new section 10447 enacted which does not define "domestic violence". However, such term is defined in section 12291 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14042 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 575.404 Use of authority. ( a ) Each determination to pay a supervisory differential shall be made in writing under procedures established by each agency.
( b ) The procedures established by each agency under paragraph (a) of this section shall provide that— ( 1 ) Each determination to pay a supervisory differential, including the amount of such differential, shall be reviewed and approved by an official of the agency who is at higher level than the official who made the initial decision, unless there is no official at a higher level in the agency; and
( 2 ) In determining whether to use the authority under 5 U.S.C. 5755 and this subpart and in determining the amount of such differential, the relationship in pay among supervisors under the General Schedule in the same organizational component of the agency shall be considered, as well as the relationship in pay between the supervisor and his or her subordinate(s).
( 3 ) Each determination to pay a supervisory differential shall be documented.
#### In the Matter of George W. Anderson, Inc. In the Matter of Robest Realty Corp. Esther Yudell, Appellant; Robert I. Yudell, Respondent.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2087

To establish the Bob Hope American Patriot Award. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2003

Mr. COX (for himself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To establish the Bob Hope American Patriot Award.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bob Hope American 

5 Patriot Award Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOB HOPE AMERICAN PATRIOT AWARD. 

7 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of the Con8 gress that—

9 (1) a presidential award should be established 

10 to encourage love of country and service to the peo11 ple of the United States; and 
2

•HR 2087 IH 

1 (2) it is appropriate to name such an award for 

2 Bob Hope because of his service to the Armed 

3 Forces of the United States, not through combat, 

4 but through his patriotism and dedication to the 

5 spiritual well-being of the troops he entertained for 

6 so many years. 

7 (b) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Bob 

8 Hope American Patriot Award (in this section referred to 

9 as the ‘‘award’’). 

10 (c) SELECTION OF RECIPIENT.—Each year, the 

11 President may select to receive the award not more than 

12 one civilian individual or organization that—

13 (1) has demonstrated extraordinary love of this 

14 Nation and devotion to its citizens in the form of 

15 true patriotism; and 

16 (2) best represents the fundamental facets of 

17 Americanism, namely freedom, democracy, strength, 

18 justice, and goodwill. 

19 (d) PRESENTATION OF AWARD.—

20 (1) ARRANGEMENTS.—Subject to paragraph 

21 (2), the President may make appropriate arrange22 ments for the presentation of the award. 

23 (2) WHITE HOUSE CEREMONY.—Each presen24 tation of the award shall be at a White House cere25 mony. 
3

•HR 2087 IH 

1 (e) PUBLICATION OF AWARD.—An individual or or2 ganization to which an award is made under this section 

3 may publicize the receipt of the award by the individual 

4 or organization and may use the award in advertising.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 27, 2010 

s0419 

Order 

 

April 27, 2010 

140150 & (37) 

JACKOB TRAKHTENBERG, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140150 

 COA: 285247 

Oakland CC: 2008-088401-NM 

DEBORAH H. McKELVY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion to file late reply is GRANTED. The application 

for leave to appeal the October 27, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered 

and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People v Jacob Trakhtenberg (Docket No. 

138875) has been remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings and that the 

decision in that case may have an effect on an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
Section 1350 Certification
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

       In connection with the quarterly  report of Pioneer  Financial  Services,
Inc. (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  December 31, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the
Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and (2) the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

        Date: February 14, 2006
                                              By:  /s/ William D. Sullivan
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   William D. Sullivan
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
# L_2018068EN.01000101.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020

The Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway (1) entered into force on 1 August 2017, the procedure provided for in Article 19.3 of the Agreement having been completed on 20 July 2017.

1

---

(1)  Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on supplementary rules in relation to the instrument for financial support for external borders and visa, as part of the Internal Security Fund for the period 2014 to 2020 (OJ L 75, 21.3.2017, p. 3).

1

---
#### Bisesarlall Brijlal, Plaintiff, v. Andes Trading Company, Inc., Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Hab Manufacturing Co., Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present.— Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 831.1742 Computation of composite annuity at final retirement. ( a ) Subject to the adjustment described in paragraph (c) of this section, a phased retiree's composite retirement annuity at final retirement equals the sum obtained by adding— ( 1 ) The amount computed under § 831.1741(a) without adjustment under § 831.1741(b) and (c), increased by cost-of-living adjustments under § 831.1743(c); and
( 2 ) The “fully retired phased component” computed under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) Subject to the requirements described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, a “fully retired phased component” equals the product obtained by multiplying— ( i ) The working percentage; by
( ii ) The amount of an annuity computed under 5 U.S.C. 8339 that would have been payable at the time of full retirement if the individual had not elected phased retirement status and as if the individual was employed on a full-time basis in the position occupied during the phased retirement period and before any reduction for survivor annuity.
( 2 ) In applying paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, the individual must be deemed to have a full-time schedule during the period of phased retirement. The deemed full-time schedule will consist of five 8-hour workdays each workweek, resulting in a 40-hour workweek. In determining the individual's deemed rate of basic pay during phased retirement, only basic pay for hours within the deemed full-time schedule will be considered, consistent with the definition of “full-time” in § 831.1702. Any premium pay creditable as basic pay for retirement purposes for overtime work or hours outside the full-time schedule that an employee was receiving before phased retirement, such as standby duty pay under 5 U.S.C. 5545(c)(1) or customs officer overtime pay under 19 U.S.C. 267(a), may not be considered in determining a phased retiree's deemed rate of basic pay during phased retirement.
( 3 ) In computing the annuity amount under paragraph (b)(1) of this section— ( i ) The amount of unused sick leave equals the result of dividing the days of unused sick leave to the individual's credit at separation for full retirement by the working percentage; and
( ii ) The reduction for any unpaid deposit for non-deduction service performed before October 1, 1982, is based on the amount of unpaid deposit, with interest computed to the commencing date of the composite annuity.
( c ) The composite retirement annuity computed under paragraph (a) of this section is adjusted by applying any reduction for any survivor annuity benefit.
( d ) The monthly installment derived from a composite retirement annuity computed under paragraph (a) of this section and adjusted under paragraph (c) is adjusted by any— ( 1 ) Actuarial reduction applied to the phased retirement annuity under § 831.1741(b), increased by cost-of-living adjustments under § 831.1743(d); and
( 2 ) Offset under § 831.1005 (i.e., the offset based on all service, including service during the phased retirement period, performed by the individual that was subject to mandatory Social Security coverage).
### §11276. Consolidated review of applications

With respect to funds available to carry out parts A, B, C, D, and E, nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary from—

(1) announcing, in a single announcement, the availability of funds for grants under 2 or more of such parts; and

(2) reviewing applications for grants under 2 or more of such parts in a single, consolidated application review process.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title III, §385, as added Pub. L. 106–71, §3(o), Oct. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1041.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5731a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 385 of Pub. L. 93–415 was renumbered section 388 and is classified to section 11280 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert L. Barclay, Otherwise Called Robert Schaffer, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 532.701 General.

A prevailing rate employee may at any time appeal the occupational series, grade, or title to which the employee's job is assigned, but may not appeal under this subpart the standards established for the job, nor other matters such as the accuracy of the job description, the rate of pay, or the propriety of a wage schedule rate. The filing of a job-grading appeal does not negate any other appeal or grievance rights which may be available under applicable law, rule, regulation, or negotiated agreement.

[51 FR 18561, May 21, 1986]
### §701. Uniforms, arms, and equipment to be same as Army or Air Force

So far as practicable, the same types of uniforms, arms, and equipment as are issued to the Army shall be issued to the Army National Guard, and the same types of uniforms, arms, and equipment as are issued to the Air Force shall be issued to the Air National Guard.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 612.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 701 | 32:31. | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §82; restated June 15, 1933, ch. 87, §17, 48 Stat. 160. |

The words "shall be issued" are substituted for the words "shall * * * be uniformed, armed, and equipped with". The words "as are issued" are substituted for the words "as are or shall be provided". The word "Army" is substituted for the words "Regular Army", since the Army is the category to which uniforms, arms, and equipment are issued, and the Regular Army is a personnel category only. Similarly, the words "Air Force" are used instead of the words "Regular Air Force".
#### SPINKS et al. v. SECOND NAT. BANK OF WASHINGTON et al.

No. 11962.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 6, 1954.

Decided June 10, 1954.

Petition for Rehearing Denied July 13, 1954.

Mr. Kahl K. Spriggs, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. David B. Nicholson and Woodson P. Houghton, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Charles E. Pledger, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellee William Mouat Hannay, Ill.

Messrs. William E. Leahy, Washington, D. C., and James F. Reilly, Wash*854ington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee The Second Nat. Bank of Washington.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, PRET-TYMAN and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia which construed a codicil to a will. We think the trial judge’s construction of the testator’s language was correct for the reasons given in his opinion, 1953, 122 F.Supp. 153.

Affirmed.

BAZELON, Circuit Judge

(dissenting).

I cannot agree with my brothers in following the view of the District Court that all the persons named in the codicil’s residuary clause, in dispute here, share and share alike and that the shares of those who predeceased the testator be distributed to their surviving issue, if any.

This clause provides:

> “The residue of my estate remaining after the payment of all costs of administration and all bequests made in my said Will and this Codicil thereto is hereby devised and bequeathed to the following named persons:

> “1. Mary Hannay, widow of my brother, George F. Hannay; George F. Hannay, Jr.; William Mouat Hannay; Robina Hannay; Sadie Hannay; Edith Hannay Bingle; Margaret McCallum Scott Spinks; Allison Fendall Hannay Scott; William Mouat Hannay III; the daughter of Edith Hannay Bingle; Grace V. Scott and Allis Scott Simmons; *each of them to receive the portion of said residue to which they would be entitled had I died intestate.”*[Emphasis supplied.]

This language reflects a gross ambiguity since five of the twelve persons named are not next of kin, and hence would be entitled to receive nothing if the testator had died intestate,' and since at least one other person who is next of kin is not named in this clause. I am unable to draw any reasonable view of the testator’s intent, from the will as a whole and the surrounding circumstances, upon which to resolve this ambiguity. For that reason, I cannot escape the conclusion, despite the strong presumption against intestacy, that the. codicil’s residuary clause is void and the property involved thereunder should therefore pass by intestacy.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0144 - Final Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45)

Accession Number: ML082490364

Date Released: Monday, October 6, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML082490372 - SECY-08-0144- Final Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (9 page(s), 10/1/2008)
    - ML082490380 - SECY-08-0144 - Enclosure 1:  Federal Register Notice re:  Final Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (227 page(s), 10/1/2008)
    - ML082490444 - SECY-08-0144 - Enclosure 2:  Regulatory Analysis re:  Final Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (66 page(s), 10/1/2008)
    - ML082490398 - SECY-08-0144 - Enclosure 3:  Environmental Assessment re:  Final Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (7 page(s), 10/1/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer