alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1616

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To authorize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther King, Junior,

National Historic Site for lands owned by the City of Atlanta, Georgia, and

for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Martin Luther King, Junior,

National Historic Site Land Exchange Act’’.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:

(1) Public Law 96–438 established the Martin Luther King,

Junior, National Historic Site, and allows acquisition, by donation only, of lands owned by the State.

(2) The National Park Service owns a vacant lot that has

no historic significance. The City of Atlanta has expressed

interest in acquiring this property to encourage commercial

development along Edgewood Avenue.

(3) The National Historic Site Visitor Center and Museum

is land-locked and has no emergency ingress or egress, making

it virtually impossible for firefighting equipment to reach.

(4) The acquisition of city-owned property would enable

the National Park Service to establish easy street access to

the National Historic Site Visitor Center and Museum, and

would benefit the City by exchanging a piece of property that

the City could develop.

(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to authorize the

exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther King, Junior,

National Historic Site for lands owned by the City of Atlanta,

Georgia.
H. R. 1616—2

SEC. 3. LAND EXCHANGE.

Section 2(b)(1) of the Act of October 10, 1980 (Public Law

96–428; 94 Stat. 1839; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is amended by striking

the period and inserting ‘‘or exchange.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# L_2017161EN.01006601.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/66

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 278/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1067]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1536 of 16 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 as regards alignment of rules for continuing airworthiness with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, critical maintenance tasks and aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1536 of 16 September 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 as regards alignment of rules for continuing airworthiness with Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, critical maintenance tasks and aircraft continuing airworthiness monitoring (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 66q (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 R 1536: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1536 of 16 September 2015 (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 R 1536: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1536 of 16 September 2015 (OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 16).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) 2015/1536 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 241, 17.9.2015, p. 16.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE
CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|                    |  |  |  |                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  |                                  
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 10, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/    JOHN LONG                 
|                    |  |  |  |                                  
|                    |  |  |  | John Long Chief Executive
Officer
|                    |  |  |  |                                  



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# L_2020068EN.01008101.xml

| 5.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/81

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 323/2019

of 13 December 2019

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2020/341]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1790 of 16 November 2018 repealing Decision 2002/623/EC establishing guidance notes on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1790 of 16 November 2018 repealing Decision 2002/623/EC establishing guidance notes on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1790 repeals Commission Decision 2002/623/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1790 repeals Commission Decision 2002/623/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 25e (Commission Decision 2002/623/EC) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1790 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1)

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 293, 20.11.2018, p. 32.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 200, 30.7.2002, p. 22.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §30111. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1316.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30111 | 36:891. | Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–870, §11, 72 Stat. 1694. |

Section
### §646. Headquarters and meetings of commission

The headquarters and general offices of said commission shall be located at some city or town on the Mississippi River, to be designated by the Secretary of the Army, and the meetings of the commission except such as are held on Government boats during the time of the semiannual inspection trips of the commission shall be held at said headquarters and general offices, the times of said meetings to be fixed by the president of the commission, who shall cause due notice of such meetings to be given members of the commission and the public.

(June 28, 1879, ch. 43, §8, as added Feb. 18, 1901, ch. 377, 31 Stat. 793; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
§ 319.103 Scientific and professional positions. ( a ) ST positions are established under 5 U.S.C. 3104 to carry out research and development functions that require the services of specially qualified personnel.
( b ) Research and development functions are defined in The Guide to Personnel Data Standards under the data element “Functional Classification.” The guide is available for inspection at the Office of Personnel Management library, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington DC 20415.
( c ) An ST position must be engaged in research and development in the physical, biological, medical, or engineering sciences, or a closely related field.
( d ) ST positions are in the competitive service.
No. II-09-013 March 19, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC TO BEGIN SPECIAL INSPECTION AT NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is scheduled to begin a special inspection at the 

Nuclear Fuel Services facility in Erwin, Tenn. next week. The team, consisting of one of the 

facility’s resident inspectors and another inspector based in the NRC’s Atlanta office, will 

inspect and assess an issue with glove box drains discovered earlier this month by NFS. A glove 

box is an enclosure equipped with gloved openings that allow workers to handle materials inside, 

preventing contamination of the work area and workers. 

On March 4, NFS filed an event report with the NRC after a company engineer found a 

discrepancy in the flow rate calculations of the overflow drains at the bottom of the glove boxes. 

NFS found that the drains may not correctly limit the amount of liquid that could collect in the 

glove box. The company has shut down 23 affected glove boxes until the issue is resolved. 

During the special inspection, the NRC inspectors will review the company’s response 

and investigation; evaluate the adequacy of the company’s root cause analysis after a similar 

event in 2005; and identify any generic issues for NFS or other nuclear fuel cycle facilities. 

 The special inspection will begin Monday, March 23, and is expected to continue for 

about a week. The NRC will issue a report within 30 days of the completion of the inspection. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 67459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 3.125 percent for the January-March quarter of FY 
2019.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the 
cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New 
York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted 
by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate 
will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given 
State.

Dianna L. Seaborn,
Director, Office of Financial Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-28307 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 27 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

DEAN ALAN MILLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. ROBERT D. HANNIGAN, Warden,

Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-3327 (Dist. of Kansas) (D.C. No. 96-CV-3009)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BALDOCK , EBEL , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Accor dingly, we honor the parties’ requests and order the cause sub mitted without oral argument. Dean A. Miller, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Robert D. Hannigan, th e Warden of the Hutchinson-2-

Correctional Facility. In his complaint, Miller al leged that his constitutional rights were being violated by his exposure to envir onmental tobacco smoke (“ETS”). In light of the fact that the Hutchinson facility had recently adopted a smoking ban and the vague and conclusory nature of Miller’s allegations, the district court concluded that no reasonable factfin der could conclude that Hannigan was deliberately indifferent to Miller’s r ight to be free from exposure to ETS. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo , applying the same standards as the district court. See Pietrowski v. Town of Dibble , 134 F.2d 1006, 1008 (10th Cir. 1998). We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs on appeal, the district court’s Memorandum and Order, and the entire recordbefore this court. Based upon that review, we conclude that the district cou rt committed no reversible error and AFFIRM for substantially those reasons set forth by the d istrict court. ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
GLOBAL AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF CHANGE IN CONTROL OR CHANGE OF CONTROL



 Exhibit 10. (zz) 
  
 Global Amendment to Definition of “Change in Control” or “Change of Control” 
  
 The third paragraph (relating to reorganizations and mergers) of the definition of the terms
“Change in Control” and “Change of Control,” as the case may be, contained in the documents listed below is hereby amended in the form set forth on Exhibit A hereto (with such modifications to the paragraph numbering
and defined terms as shall be necessary to conform the definition to a particular plan or agreement): 
  

	1.	 	The Trust Agreement for Executive Deferred Compensation Plans No. 1 and 2 


	2.	 	The Trust Agreement for the Retirement Income Assurance Plan and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 


	3.	 	The Trust Agreement for the Executive Supplemental Plan 


	4.	 	The 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan 


	5.	 	The Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan 

  







 Exhibit A 
  

(c) Consummation of a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange or consolidation or similar corporate transaction involving the Company or any
of its subsidiaries, a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the acquisition of assets or stock of another entity by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (each, a “Business Combination”),
in each case unless, following such Business Combination, (i) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding
voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”) immediately prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 50%
of the then-outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such Business
Combination (including, without limitation, a corporation which, as a result of such transaction, owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the
same proportions as their ownership immediately prior to such Business Combination of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be and (ii) at least a majority of the members of the board of
directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or of the action of the Board providing for such Business Combination.
EXHIBIT 99.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oregon Pacific Bancorp (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Thomas Grove, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companyand of Oregon Pacific Banking Co. (the “Bank”), certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: April 30, 2003
/s/ Thomas K. Grove
Thomas K. Grove
August 14, 2015

Mr. Ryan Casey

CEO

Skyward Film, Inc.

88 Belgium Street

Cranston, RI 02920

Dear Mr. Casey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23, 45.29, 61.113, 61.133, 91.9, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203, 91.401 – 91. 

417, and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered exemption request on behalf of Skyward Film, Inc. into the public docket 

(No. FAA−2015−1671) on May 14, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3