alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §41506. United States-Mexico Border Violence Task Force

#### (a) Task Force

(1) The Attorney General shall establish the United States-Mexico Border Violence Task Force in Laredo, Texas, to combat drug and firearms trafficking, violence, and kidnapping along the border between the United States and Mexico and to provide expertise to the law enforcement and homeland security agencies along the border between the United States and Mexico. The Task Force shall include personnel from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Drug Enforcement Administration, Customs and Border Protection, other Federal agencies (as appropriate), the Texas Department of Public Safety, and local law enforcement agencies.

(2) The Attorney General shall make available funds to provide for the ongoing administrative and technological costs to Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies participating in the Task Force.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2009, for—

(1) the establishment and operation of the United States-Mexico Border Violence Task Force; and

(2) the investigation, apprehension, and prosecution of individuals engaged in drug and firearms trafficking, violence, and kidnapping along the border between the United States and Mexico.

(Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1106, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 509 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,427

EX PARTE MARVIN WADDLETON, III, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 241-0085-06 IN THE 114 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM SMITH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault of a public servant and sentenced to life imprisonment. His direct appeal was dismissed by

the Twelfth Court for want of jurisdiction. Waddleton v. State, No. 12-06-00121-CR (Tex.

App.–Tyler, Jun. 7, 2006, no pet.) (unpublished). 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because the

notice of appeal did not include the certification of applicant’s right of appeal, which resulted in the
2

appeal being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

The trial court has determined that applicant was denied his right to appeal due to no fault

of his own and he should be granted an out-of-time appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No.

241-0085-06 from the 114 Judicial District Court of Smith County. Applicant is ordered returned th

to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of

counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been

imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: September 29, 2010

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual report of Hesperia Holding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steve Chaussy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Hesperia Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Hesperia
Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Date:  March 8, 2005                              By: /s/ STEVE CHAUSSY
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Steve Chaussy
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 5701.102 Fundraising activities.

When engaging in personal fundraising, as described at 5 CFR 2635.808(c), an employee of the Federal Trade Commission may, notwithstanding the prohibition of § 2635.808(c)(1)(i), personally solicit funds from a person who is a prohibited source only under 5 CFR 2635.203(d)(3) (*i.e.,* because the person “conducts activities regulated by” the Commission). The other provisions of § 2635.808(c) continue to apply to any such personal fundraising.

# Example 1:

A Federal Trade Commission employee is president of the local branch of her college alumni association. The association is seeking contributions from local businesses. The employee may, during her off-duty hours, seek a contribution from a company that is regulated by the Commission, but not from one that she knows is currently under Commission investigation or is seeking official action by the Commission, does business or seeks to do business with the Commission, or has interests that may be substantially affected by the employee's job. While the Standards of Conduct provide that companies under the agency's enforcement authority generally are prohibited sources of an employee's fundraising in a personal capacity, § 5701.102 provides that employees of the FTC may seek charitable contributions from an entity that is a prohibited source only because its activities are subject to agency regulation.

[63 FR 43070, Aug. 12, 1998]
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t

M e m o r a n d u m

FORM G-ll5f(l-92)

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

JAN 0 7 2000

L-2000-3

TO Philip H. Arnold

Chief, Records, Analysis & Systems

FROM Steven A Bart] 

General Couns

SUBJECT : Retirement Pension Plan of the Consolidated Rail

Corporation

This is in response to your memorandum dated December 14,1999, requesting 

an opinion as to w hether the above-referenced retirem ent plan (Plan) is a

supplemental pension plan within the meaning of section 2(hX2) of the 

Railroad Retirement Act (RRA).

Section 216.42(a) of the Board’s regulations defines a supplemental pension 

plan as follows:

(a) What is a private railroad pension. * * * A private pension for 

purposes of this subpart is a plan that:

(1) Is a written plan or arrangement which is communicated 

to the employees to whom it applies;

(2) Is established and maintained by an employer for a 

defined group of employees; and

(3) Provides for the payment of definitely determinable 

benefits to employees over a period of years, usually for life, 

after retirement or disability. Such a plan is sometimes 

referred to as a defined benefit plan.

The Plan at issue is a written plan which is communicated to the employees to 

whom it applies. It covers highly compensated employees of the Consolidated 

Rail Corporation. The Plan was created by “spinning off’ assets of the
Philip H. Arnold

Supplemental Pension Plan of the Consolidated Rail Corporation sufficient to 

fund the benefits payable under the new Plan.1

The Plan in question is a defined benefit plan. Benefits payable under the plan 

are based upon a participant’s service for the Consolidated Rail Corporation 

through July 31,1998. Benefits are payable for life at specified ages and are 

reduced in part by the tier I and tier II railroad retirement benefit, but not the 

supplemental annuity.

On the basis of my review of the documents provided with your inquiry, I 

concur with your opinion that the above-described pension plan is a 

supplemental pension within the meaning of section 2(hX2) of the RRA and 

section 216.42 of the Board’s regulations. Consequently, benefits under the 

Plan will reduce the supplemental annuity to the extent benefits are based 

upon employer contributions.

Reports of reductions in the supplemental annuities of Consolidated Rail 

Corporation employees for the purpose of claiming tax credits under section 

3221(c), should be directed to the Consolidated Rail Corporation.

H:\OPINIONS\Retirement Plan conrail.supp.plan.tws

TWSadler:tws:scm:ikf^ -

c. 3652-99 V J

JThe supplemental Pension Plan of the Consolidated Rail Corporation 

was determined to be a supplemental pension plan in Legal Opinion L-90-41. 

There is nothing in the present documentation which would indicate that this 

plan has been terminated.
### **CHAPTER 225—AMERICAN WAR MOTHERS**

Sec.
22501.
Organization.
22502.
Purposes.
22503.
Membership.
22504.
Powers.
22505.
Exclusive right to name.
22506.
Restrictions.
22507.
Tax-exempt status.
22508.
Meetings.
22509.
Service of process.
22510.
Annual report.
### §130510. Statement required in audit report

The corporation shall include in the audit report statement required under section 10101(b)(1)(B) of this title a schedule of all contracts requiring payments greater than $10,000 and all payments of compensation or fees at a rate greater than $10,000 a year.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1378.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130510 | 36:1084(b) (2d sentence cl. (2)). | July 16, 1964, Pub. L. 88–378, §14(b) (2d sentence cl. (2)), 78 Stat. 328. |

Section

The word "salaries" is omitted as included in "compensation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 202 of House Document No. 103–7.
#### § 720.206 Selection guidelines.

This subpart sets forth requirements for a recruitment program, not a selection program. Nevertheless, agencies are advised that all selection processes including job qualifications, personnel procedures and criteria must be consistent with the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (43 FR 38290; August 25, 1978).
### §20108. Crime victims notification grants

#### (a) In general

The Director may make grants as provided in section 20103(c)(1)(A) of this title to State, tribal, and local prosecutors' offices, law enforcement agencies, courts, jails, and correctional institutions, and to qualified public or private entities, to develop and implement state-of-the-art systems for notifying victims of crime of important dates and developments relating to the criminal proceedings at issue in a timely and efficient manner, provided that the jurisdiction has laws substantially equivalent to the provisions of chapter 237 of title 18.

#### (b) Integration of systems

Systems developed and implemented under this section may be integrated with existing case management systems operated by the recipient of the grant.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

In addition to funds made available under section 20101(d) of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section—

(1) $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2005; and

(2) $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009.

#### (d) False Claims Act

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, amounts collected pursuant to sections 3729 through 3731 of title 31 (commonly known as the "False Claims Act") may be used for grants under this section, subject to appropriation.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §1404E, as added Pub. L. 108–405, title I, §103(c), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2265.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 10603e of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §253. Disclaimer

(a) In General.—Whenever a claim of a patent is invalid the remaining claims shall not thereby be rendered invalid. A patentee, whether of the whole or any sectional interest therein, may, on payment of the fee required by law, make disclaimer of any complete claim, stating therein the extent of his interest in such patent. Such disclaimer shall be in writing, and recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office; and it shall thereafter be considered as part of the original patent to the extent of the interest possessed by the disclaimant and by those claiming under him.

(b) Additional Disclaimer or Dedication.—In the manner set forth in subsection (a), any patentee or applicant may disclaim or dedicate to the public the entire term, or any terminal part of the term, of the patent granted or to be granted.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 809; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(e), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 334.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §65 (R.S. 4917).

Language is changed and substantive changes are introduced; (1) only a claim as a whole may be disclaimed, and (2) the provision regarding delay is omitted. See preliminary general description of bill.

See section 288.

The second paragraph is new and provides for the disclaiming or dedication of an entire patent, or any terminal part of the term, for example, a patentee may disclaim the last three years of the term of his patent.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29 designated first and second pars. as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, inserted headings, in subsec. (a), substituted "Whenever" for "Whenever, without any deceptive intention,", and, in subsec. (b), substituted "In the manner set forth in subsection (a)," for "In like manner".

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Otto Fleischner, Respondent, against Imperial Linoleum & Carpet Company et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant was employed as a carpet layer and on November 29, 1950, he suffered a lumbosacral sprain while lifting a radiator. There is no issue raised about the finding that he was thereafter, beginning December 8, 1950, totally disabled for ten days until December 18th, when he returned to work. He has had an award based on partial disability from March 29, 1951, to January 31, 1952. We think the record as a whole does not fairly support the finding of partial disability. The medical proof of claimant is fragmentary, contradictory and equivocal. The case should be re-examined by the board. The employer ought to be permitted to submit proof of reasons other than physical disability arising from the accident why claimant did not work during the period in issue. Decision and award reversed, on the law, with costs to appellants, and claim remitted to the board for its further consideration. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-070 May 23, 2006

CORRECTION: NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE 

FOR SEABROOK NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by FPL Energy Seabrook to

increase the generating capacity of Seabrook Station by 1.7 percent. The NRC staff determined that

FPL could safely increase the reactor’s power output primarily through increased feedwater flow

measurement accuracy. NRC staff also reviewed FPL evaluations that showed the plant’s design can

handle the increased power level.

 The NRC's safety evaluation of the plant’s proposed power uprate focused on several areas,

including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

The power uprate for the unit, located 13 miles south of Portsmouth, N.H., will increase its

generating capacity from approximately 1,220 to 1,240 megawatts electric. FPL intends to operate

Seabrook at the higher power level following its fall refueling operations.

NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal Register,

providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No comments or hearing

requests were received by the NRC. The agency’s evaluation of the Seabrook uprate will be available

through the NRC’s ADAMS electronic document database by entering ML061360034 on this Web

page: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm .

###
(October 23,1951.)

#### Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York, Respondent, v. John Sciacco, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J. Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 370.101 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to implement sections 209(b)(6) and (c) of the E-Government Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-347), which authorize the Office of Personnel Management to establish an Information Technology Exchange Program. This statute authorizes the temporary detail of information technology employees between the Federal Government and private sector organizations. The statute also gives Federal agencies the authority to accept private sector information technology employees detailed under the Information Technology Exchange Program.
( b ) Agency heads, or their designees, may approve details as a mechanism for improving the Federal workforce's competency in using information technology to deliver Government information and services. Details under this part allow Federal employees to serve with private sector organizations for a limited time period without loss of employee rights and benefits. Agencies may not make details under this part to circumvent personnel ceilings, or as a substitute for other more appropriate personnel decisions or actions. Approved details must meet the strategic program goals of the agency. The benefits to the Federal agency and the private sector organization are the primary considerations in initiating details; not the desires or personal needs of an individual employee.
U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2370
**Interpretive Geologic Cross Sections for the Death Valley Regional Flow System and Surrounding Areas, Nevada and California**
*By* Donald S. Sweetkind, Robert P. Dickerson, Richard J. Blakely,*and* Paul D. Denning
Version 1.0

The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format. The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge, click here.
Pamphlet PDF file (2.0 MB)Pamphlet text-only PDF file (2.7 MB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
Sheet 1 PDF file (8.9 MB)Sheet 1 text-only PDF file (50 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
Sheet 2 PDF file (4.2 MB)Sheet 2 text-only PDF file (38 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
Sheet 3 PDF file (3.8 MB)Sheet 3 text-only PDF file (38 KB)(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/mf/2001/mf-2370/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 12:07 EDT 2016
### §151911. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be distributed as provided by the board of directors, but in compliance with the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1410.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151911 | 36:615. | Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1036, §15, 68 Stat. 895. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The words "outstanding" and "all Federal and State laws applicable thereto" are omitted as unnecessary.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DARRELL DWAYNE WHITE, )

DOC #501185, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1915

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 3, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Thomas P. Barber, 

Judge.

Darrell Dwayne White, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.