alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, Review of HIV Supplement.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Martha Ann Carey, PhD, RN, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activites, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Room 6151, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, (301) 443-1606,                         *mcarey@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training; National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-25017  Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.205b Authority to return an SES employee to his or her former or successor agency. The transfer of a career SES appointee with a grant of reemployment rights under this subpart authorizes the return of the employee to his or her former or successor agency when the employee is reemployed in his or her former or successor agency— ( a ) Without a break in service of 1 workday or more in any position in the SES for which the employee is qualified; and
( b ) At not less than the SES rate of basic pay as determined under 5 CFR part 534, subpart D at which the employee was being paid immediately before his or her transfer.
[51 FR 25187, July 11, 1986]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25


Airworthiness Standards: Transportation Category Airplanes

CFR Correction

0
 In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, revised 
as of January 1, 2018, on page 218, in Sec.  25.143, paragraph (c)(1) 
is reinstated to read as follows:


 Sec.  25.143   General.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) At the minimum V<INF>2</INF> for takeoff;
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-27860 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
No. I-07-046 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

September 11, 2007

NRC TO SOLICIT PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SEPT. 19 

AS PART OF INDIAN POINT LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION REVIEW 

 

Public comments on potential environmental impacts from a license renewal for the 

Indian Point nuclear power plant will be accepted by Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff at 

two meetings on Wednesday, Sept. 19. The meetings are scheduled to begin at 1:30 p.m. and 7 

p.m., respectively, at the Colonial Terrace catering facility, 119 Oregon Road in Cortlandt 

Manor, N.Y. 

Directions to the facility are available at: www.colonialterracecaterers.com/ . Those 

planning to attend are advised that parking may be limited. 

An “open house” will be held 1 hour before each meeting to provide citizens with an 

opportunity to talk informally with agency staff. It is important to note, however, that formal 

comments must be expressed during the transcribed meetings. 

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., which operates the Buchanan (Westchester County), 

N.Y., plant, applied to the NRC on April 30, 2007 to extend the operating licenses for the tworeactor plant by 20 years each. The current operating license for Indian Point 2 is due to expire 

on Sept. 28, 2013 and Indian Point 3’s on Dec. 12, 2015. 

As part of its review of the application, the NRC staff will prepare a draft environmental 

impact statement (EIS). The comments provided at the meetings on Sept. 19 will be considered 

as that report is being developed. Once a draft version of the report is completed, the NRC staff 

will once again meet with the public to solicit comments on that document. Following 

consideration of those comments, a final EIS will be prepared. 

More information on the Indian Point license renewal application is available on the NRC 

web site at: www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/indian-point.html . 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 550.161 Responsibilities of the agencies. The head of each agency, or an official who has been delegated authority to act for the head of an agency in the matter concerned, is responsible for: ( a ) Fixing tours of duty; ordering employees to remain at their stations in a standby status; and placing responsibility on employees for remaining on duty when required by circumstances.
( b ) Determining, in accordance with section 5545(c) of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart, which employees shall receive premium pay on an annual basis under § 550.141 or § 550.151. These determinations may not be retroactive.
( c ) Determining the number of hours of actual work to be customarily required in positions involving longer than ordinary periods of duty, a substantial part of which consists of standby duty. This determination shall be based on consideration of the time required by regular, repetitive operations, available records of the time required in the past by other activities, and any other information bearing on the number of hours of actual work which may reasonably be expected to be required in the future.
( d ) Determining the number of hours of irregular or occasional overtime work to be customarily required in positions which require substantial amounts of irregular or occasional overtime work with the employee generally being responsible for recognizing, without supervision, circumstances which require him to remain on duty. This determination shall be based on consideration of available records of the hours of irregular or occasional overtime work required in the past, and any other information bearing on the number of hours of duty which may reasonably be expected to be required in the future.
( e ) Determining the rate of premium pay fixed by OPM under § 550.144 or § 550.154 which is applicable to each employee paid under § 550.141 or § 550.151; or, if no rate fixed under § 550.144 or § 550.154 is considered applicable, proposing a rate of premium pay on an annual basis to OPM.
( f ) Reviewing determinations under paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) of this section at appropriate intervals, and discontinuing payments or revising rates of premium pay on an annual basis in each instance when that action is necessary to meet the requirements of section 5545(c) of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart.
[33 FR 12458, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 35 FR 6311, Apr. 18, 1970]
#### Frank E. Nash, Doing Business under the Name of Frank E. Nash Fence Company, Respondent, v. Frank Mennan, as President of Local 580 of the International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers, et al., Appellants.

In our opinion the evidence

establishes a labor dispute within the meaning of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act. Although the members of the defendant union are not employees of the plaintiff, and the defendants were not attempting to organize plaintiff’s employees and were not interested in representing them as their bargaining agent, defendants had, nevertheless, a direct interest in the labor policies of plaintiff, who was engaged in the same industry as were the members of the defendant union, and whose wage scale was lower than that of the defendant union, for the work of erecting fences. All engaged in a trade are affected by the prevailing rate of wages. *(May’s Furs & Ready-To-Wear,*v. *Bauer,*
      *610282 N. Y. 331-340.) The dispute involved, although jurisdictional in nature, concerned terms and conditions of employment which directly affected the interests of the members of the defendant union. Consequently, plaintiff’s failure to comply with the provisions of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act requires the reversal of the judgment and the dismissal of the complaint. Moreover, whether such a labor dispute is, or is not, involved, it is our opinion that the evidence adduced was insufficient to establish any wrongful acts, or threats, on the part of defendants which justified injunctive relief. The members of defendant union had the right to refuse to work on any ground which they might consider sufficient, and to act individually, or as an organization, if they had no unlawful object in view. *(National Protective Assn.*v. *Cumming,*170 N. Y. 315; *Williams*v. *Quill,*277 N. Y. 1.) Under the circumstances disclosed by this record, it was not unlawful for the members of defendant union to refuse to work on jobs upon which plaintiff’s employees were erecting fences, or for defendants to threaten to call a strike of such members, if such conditions should continue. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 666.]
Regulatory Evaluation Complete when issuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure. 

### 0 No C hange from exist ing AD action 

## 2 0 I 

### "f
- C 

## f?"- as (
- liD Docket No. FAA- Directorate I denti fi er : -AD /j you make change., to the \'alue.' in the table hi!lm1, youmn't t'llsure the total.\ update accordingly. /j the) do not. dick (or Tah) into and !hen olll ofthe cll<lllgt?d cell
. Estimated Costs : Costs per P ro

du ct (e.g., aircraft , engine, Action propeller, appl i ance) (e.g., Ins p ection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost (include cost (labor + 

## u.s . tor U. S
. F l eet replacement) access , testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Existing mode ls Inspect wing lift struts and wing lift 8.0 22,000 strut fo rks Install placard 1.0 $30 22,000
I ll ' , I I ' l Add itional models Inspect w ing lift struts and w ing lift 8.0 200 strut forks Install placa rd 1.0 $30 200

; c 

### ' ' 

# '

The known number of produ cts in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 17 ,64 9 ,000 Costs covered un der war ranty (if known) $ Special considera ti on s for Econom ic Analys is (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): T he 200 products are only the incremental change in U.S. registered aircraft for the extended applicability. This is beyond the economic an alysis of the existi ng AD 99

- 01

- 05 Rl which affects approx imately 22,000 aircraft.Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • YES* 

## 0 N O[gj *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD s ignificant?

## ~ YES * 

## 0 NO[gj *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer . 

# G YES 

## 0 NO[gj Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intras tate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation?

- YES* 

## 0 NO [gj *Exp lanation :
Exhibit 32.1

                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Tthe undersigned officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..      the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
       December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..      the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date:   March 27, 2006
                                   /s/ Linda L. Perry
                                   ___________________________________
                                   Linda L. Perry
                                   Principal Executive Officer
                                   Principal Financial  Officer
No. IV-08-034 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 August 4, 2008 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC FINALIZES “WHITE” FINDING FOR COOPER NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Cooper nuclear plant will continue to receive additional oversight from the Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission based on a violation that adversely affected the reliability of one of the 

plant’s emergency diesel generators. The plant, located near Brownville, Neb., is operated by the 

Nebraska Public Power District. 

The NRC uses a color-coded system to categorize inspection findings. They range from 

“green,” for an issue of very low safety significance, to “red,” for a highly significant issue. In 

this case, the violation has been determined to be “white,” indicating it is of low to moderate 

safety significance. 

The finding is based on an NRC inspection described in a report issued on May 6. The 

inspection identified a violation involving improper electrical maintenance of an emergency 

diesel generator which resulted in failure during testing on January 15. The diesel generators 

supply power to plant safety systems during emergencies in the event of a loss of off-site power. 

The licensee has taken corrective action to prevent recurrence, but the failure was significant. 

The NRC offered the licensee the opportunity to take part in a regulatory conference, at 

which additional details on an issue can be brought forward, or to respond in writing to the 

proposed action. The licensee provided additional information in writing which was taken into 

consideration by the NRC staff in reaching a final determination of the safety significance of the 

violation. The licensee has 30 days to appeal the decision. 

Cooper has been receiving additional oversight from the NRC since early 2008. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
---

---

Exhibit 14.1

# Brightman Almagor
& Co.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS

As independent auditors, we hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 16, 2005 included
in Novas Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 into
the Form S-8 Registration Statements for Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd., filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the following dates: September 13, 2000 (File No.
333-12546); March 5, 2002 (File No. 333-83734); March 5, 2002 (File No. 333-83734);
December 24, 2002 (File No. 333-102193); March 24, 2003 (File No. 333-103981); May 17,
2004 (three files; File Nos. 333-115554, 333-115555, and 333-115556); and March 7, 2005
(File No. 333-123158).

Brightman Almagor &
Co.

Certified Public
Accountants

A member of Deloitte
Touche Tohmatsu

Tel Aviv, Israel

June 28, 2005



---

---
Exhibit 99.2 

 

AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AGREEMENT 

 

THIS AMENDMENT is made this 28th day of July, 2004, by and between SAFERENT, INC., a Delaware corporation, EMPLOYEE HEALTH PROGRAMS, INC., a Florida corporation, SUBSTANCE ABUSE MANAGEMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, HIRECHECK, INC., a Florida corporation,AMERICAN DRIVING RECORDS, INC., a California corporation, FIRST AMERICAN REGISTRY, INC., a Nevada corporation and US SEARCH.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation (collectively, the “Pledgors”), and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (the “Bank”).

 

Recitals 

 

The Pledgors and the Bank executed a Security Agreement (as amended from timeto time, the “Security Agreement”) dated July 31, 2003. The parties wish to amend the Security Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof. 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 

 

1. The term “Note” as defined in the Recitals to the Security Agreement is hereby amended so that, from and afterthe date hereof, the term “Note” shall mean that certain Renewal Promissory Note dated July 28, 2004, executed by First Advantage Corporation, doing business in Florida as First Advantage Holding, Inc. (the “Borrower”) in favorof the Bank in the principal amount of $15,000,000.00 (as such Note may be amended, extended or renewed from time to time). 

 

2. Each Pledgor certifies that as of the date hereof: (a) all of its representations and warranties in the Security Agreement are true and correct as ifmade on the date hereof; and (b) no Default or Event of Default has occurred under the Security Agreement. The Security Agreement, as modified herein, shall continue in full force and effect from and after the date hereof. 

 

DATED the day and year first above written. 

 

 

EMPLOYEE HEALTH PROGRAMS, INC.By: 
/s/ John Lamson
Its: 
Vice President
   
 
HIRECHECK, INC.By: 
/s/ John Lamson
Its: 
Vice President
   
 
AMERICAN DRIVING RECORDS, INC.By: 
/s/ John Lamson
Its: 
Vice President
   
 
FIRST AMERICAN REGISTRY, INC.By: 
/s/ John Lamson
Its: 
Vice President
   
 
U.S. SEARCH.COM, INC.By: 
/s/ John Lamson
Its: 
Vice President
   
 

2
### §154501. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "State" includes the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1435.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154501 | 36:2813. | Oct. 19, 1984, Pub. L. 98–520, §14, 98 Stat. 2430. |

Section

The words "the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico" are omitted as included in "the territories and possessions of the United States".
#### Buell G. Davis, Individually and as Executor, etc., Appellant, v. George W. Seaward, as Administrator, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Motion granted pursuant to the powers conferred by chapter 553 of the Laws of 1915, amending section 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and appeal sent to the Appellate Division in the Fourth Department. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
No. II-09-022 April 21, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE 

WITH GLOBAL NUCLEAR FUEL 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a predecisional enforcement 

conference in Atlanta for Thursday, April 30 to discuss with officials of Global Nuclear Fuel -- 

Americas, LLC of Wilmington, N.C. an apparent violation of NRC requirements associated with 

the facility’s criticality warning system. 

The meeting will begin at 10 a.m. at the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, located in the 

Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth St., S. W., Suite 23T85. The meeting will be open 

to observation by the public, and NRC officials will be available at its conclusion to answer 

questions from interested observers. Members of the public interested in attending the meeting or 

participating by toll-free audio teleconference should contact the NRC=s Richard Gibson at 404-

562-4718 or richard.gibson@nrc.gov or Chad Cramer at 404-562-4712 or chad.cramer@nrc.gov.

 

An NRC inspection in February reviewed a situation in December 2008 where the 

facility’s criticality warning system had been switched from the automatic to manual mode for 

four days without proper monitoring to ensure alarm activation should an accidental nuclear 

criticality occur. The NRC inspector concluded that the company’s investigation was satisfactory 

and proposed corrective actions were adequate, but an apparent violation was noted and the 

enforcement conference scheduled. 

No decision on enforcement action will be made at the meeting. NRC officials will 

review information presented by Global Nuclear Fuel at the meeting and reach a decision on 

appropriate regulatory action at a later date. 

An NRC report with information on the issue is available through the Region II office or 

through the NRC Web page at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. The number to access the 

document is ML090850208. 

 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §240106. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1489.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 240106 | 36:3102. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–584, §2, 98 Stat. 3097. |

Section

The words "provided in" are substituted for "granted to it through" for consistency in the revised title. The words "and subject to the laws of such States" are omitted as unnecessary.