alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Global Broadcast Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, SAM WINER, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                                                                                   
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 21, 2004 |  |                                                                                                   
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Sam Winer                                                                                     
|                   |  | Sam Winer                                                                                         
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0001 - Proposed Rulemaking: Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (RIN 3150-AH85)

Accession Number: ML062010150

Date Released: Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML063310424 - SECY-07-0001 - Proposed Rulemaking: Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (RIN 3150-AH85) (9 page(s), 1/3/2007)
    - ML063310455 - SECY-07-0001 - Enclosure 1:  Federal Register Notice for Proposed Rule:  10 CFR Parts 40, 72, 74, and 150 - Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (RIN 3150-AH85) (49 page(s), 1/3/2007)
    - ML063320190 - SECY-07-0001 - Enclosure 2:  Regulatory Analysis for Proposed Rule re:  Regulatory Improvements to the Nuclear Materials Management and Safeguards System (RIN 3150-AH85) (17 page(s), 1/3/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 831.1601 Applicability and purpose. ( a ) This subpart contains regulations of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to supplement 5 U.S.C. 8336(c), which establishes special retirement eligibility for customs and border protection officers employed under the Civil Service Retirement System; 5 U.S.C. 8331(3)(C) and (G), pertaining to basic pay; 5 U.S.C. 8334(a)(1) and (c), pertaining to deductions, contributions, and deposits; 5 U.S.C. 8335(b), pertaining to mandatory retirement; and 5 U.S.C. 8339(d), pertaining to computation of annuity.
( b ) The regulations in this subpart are issued pursuant to the authority given to OPM in 5 U.S.C. 8347 to prescribe regulations to carry out subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5 of the United States Code, and in 5 U.S.C. 1104 to delegate authority for personnel management to the heads of agencies, and pursuant to the authority given the Director of OPM in Section 535(d) of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2008, Division E of Public Law 110-161, 121 Stat. 1844, at 2075.
No. 07-114 September 5, 2007

NRC MEETING SEPTEMBER 18 IN APEX, N.C., TO DISCUSS REVIEWPROCESS FOR EXPECTED NEW REACTOR APPLICATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting in Apex, N.C., onTuesday, Sept. 18, to discuss how the agency will review an expected Combined License (COL)application for new reactors at the Shearon Harris site, about 20 miles southwest of Raleigh. Theprospective applicant, Progess Energy, has told the NRC it intends to apply in a few months for alicense to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at Harris.

“The NRC’s expecting several applications before the end of this year, and as we review themwe’ll be looking for valuable input from nearby communities,” said William Borchardt, Director of theNRC’s Office of New Reactors. “This meeting will help residents understand and contribute to theprocess.”

The meeting will be held at New Horizons Fellowship, 820 E. Williams St. in Apex, from 7p.m. until 9 p.m. NRC staff presentations will describe the overall Combined License review process,which includes safety and environmental assessments, as well as how the public can participate in theprocess. The NRC will host an open house for an hour prior to the meeting so members of the publichave the opportunity to talk informally with agency staff.

A COL, if issued, is authorization from the NRC to construct and, with conditions, operate anuclear power plant at a specific site and in accordance with laws and regulations. More information onthe NRC’s new reactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Web site here:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html .

The AP1000 is one of four NRC-certified reactor designs that can be referenced in a COL. It isa 1,000 MWe advanced pressurized water reactor that incorporates passive safety systems andsimplified system designs. The AP1000 is similar to another certified design, the AP600, but uses ataller reactor vessel to accommodate longer fuel rods, and also includes larger steam generators and alarger pressurizer.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Allan Coulter, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Fun For You, Inc. (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the        Company.
/s/Anthony N.DeMint                            

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

February6, 2004
### §130502. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to promote, develop, supervise, and voluntarily assist in all lawful ways the interest of young people who participate in Little League baseball;

(2) to help and voluntarily assist young people in developing qualities of citizenship and sportsmanship; and

(3) using the disciplines of the native American game of baseball, to teach spirit and competitive will to win, physical fitness through individual sacrifice, the values of team play, and wholesome well being through healthy social association with other youngsters under proper leadership.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1377.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130502 | 36:1073. | July 16, 1964, Pub. L. 88–378, §3, 78 Stat. 325; Dec. 26, 1974, Pub. L. 93–551, 88 Stat. 1744. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24370]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>P065]


State of New York; Amendment <greek-i>1

    In accordance with notices received from the Department of Homeland 
Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective October 13 and 
22, 2004, the above numbered Public Assistance declaration is hereby 
amended to include Cattaraugus, Niagara, Orange, and Orleans Counties 
in the State of New York as a disaster area due to damages caused by 
severe storms and flooding occurring on August 29, 2004, and continuing 
through September 16, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is November 30, 2004.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008.)

    Dated: October 26, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-24370 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §130503. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(b) Voting.—Each member (except an honorary or associate member) has one vote on each matter submitted to a vote at a meeting of the members.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1377.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130503 | 36:1076. | July 16, 1964, Pub. L. 88–378, §6, 78 Stat. 326. |

Section
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0061- Semiannual Update of the Risk Informed and Performance-Based Plan

Accession Number: ML080780098

Date Released: Thursday, May 15, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML080780113 - SECY-08-0061 - Semiannual Update of the Risk Informed and Performance-Based Plan (3 page(s), 4/30/2008)
    - ML080780116 - SECY-08-0061 - Enclosure:  Recent Accomplishments and Near-Term Anticipated Accomplishments (8 page(s), 4/30/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51338

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CULLEN REED HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:91-CR-43-2

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cullen Reed Harris, federal prisoner # 01864-063, moves for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his appeal from the

district court’s denial of his motion for a nunc pro tunc order

challenging the sentences imposed following his convictions for

conspiracy to manufacture more than 1,000 grams of

methamphetamine and manufacturing more than 1,000 grams of

methamphetamine. The district court denied Harris leave to

proceed IFP on appeal, certifying that the appeal was not taken

in good faith. By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Harris is
No. 04-51338

-2-

challenging the district court’s certification. See Baugh v.

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); FED. R. APP. P.

24(a)(5). However, Harris has not demonstrated any nonfrivolous

ground for appeal.

Harris argues that the sentence enhancement he received

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) was improper. For the first

time on appeal, he asserts that his sentence was void ab initio

because 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b)(1) was held unconstitutional in

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005).

This appeal is “from the denial of a meaningless,

unauthorized motion.” See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140,

142 (5th Cir. 1994). We will not consider Harris’s Booker claim

because it was raised for the first time in an appeal from the

denial of a collateral attack on his sentence. See Whitehead v.

Johnson, 157 F.3d 384, 388 (5th Cir. 1998). Harris has failed to

show that his appeal involves “legal points arguable on their

merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed IFP on appeal is

DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117

F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Harris is WARNED that the

filing or prosecution of frivolous appeals in the future will

subject him to sanctions. See FED. R. APP. P. 38; Clark v. Green,

814 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1987).

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS

FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1761 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1761

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 9350 East Corporate Hill Drive in Wichita, Kansas, as the ``Garner 
                   E. Shriver Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9350 
East Corporate Hill Drive in Wichita, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Garner E. Shriver Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Garner E. Shriver Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 316.908 Breaks in program.

A break in program is defined as a period of time when a student is working for the agency but is unable to go to school, or is neither attending classes nor working for the agency. An agency may use its discretion in either approving or denying a request for a break in program.
§ 581.203 Information minimally required to accompany legal process. ( a ) Sufficient identifying information must accompany the legal process in order to enable processing by the governmental entity named. Therefore, the following identifying information about the obligor, if known, is requested: ( 1 ) Full name;
( 2 ) Date of birth;
( 3 ) Employment number, social security number, Department of Veterans Affairs claim number, or civil service retirement claim number;
( 4 ) Component of the governmental entity for which the obligor works, and the official duty station or worksite; and
( 5 ) Status of the obligor, e.g., employee, former employee, or annuitant.
( b ) If the information submitted is not sufficient to identify the obligor, the legal process shall be returned directly to the court, or other authority, with an explanation of the deficiency. However, prior to returning the legal process, if there is sufficient time, an attempt should be made to inform the party who caused the legal process to be served, or the party's representative, that it will not be honored unless adequate identifying information is supplied.
[45 FR 85667, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 26280, June 7, 1983; 55 FR 1357, Jan. 16, 1990]
### §498b. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §135(c), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 174

Section, act June 27, 1930, ch. 640, §1, 46 Stat. 821, provided that, in case of any bridge authorized prior to Mar. 23, 1906, by Act of Congress, where Congress has specifically reserved the right to alter, amend, or repeal such Act, regulation of all tolls be subject to sections 491 to 494 and 495 to 498 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of her knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’sannual report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, to which thiscertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

**In Witness Whereof**,the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 3rd day of May, 2006.

 

 
| /s/Nancy J. Baker                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, isnot deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
### §140709. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1385.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140709 | 36:5011. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §1811, 106 Stat. 2583. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "Nothing in this section shall be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### Max Weinstein, Respondent, *v.*Louis Berry, Appellant.

Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.

(dissenting in part). We dissent from the reversal of the order granting plaintiff’s motion to examine before trial defendant’s witnesses Frant, Simon, Jr., and Messing, except that we concur with the majority of the court in excluding from the examination the subject matter of paragraph 14 of plaintiff’s order to show cause.

The only reason for preventing plaintiff from examining these persons appears to be that they are witnesses rather than parties to the action. Each of them *810was active in transactions out of which the cause of action or defense arose, their hostility to plaintiff is unquestioned, and it is clear that plaintiff has been and will be unable to obtain material and necessary information from them without examining them before trial. The rule enunciated by this Department in *Manufacturers Trust Co.*v. *American Nat. Fire Ins. Co.*(232 App. Div. 536) should be applied. It was there stated: “ The persons whom plaintiff sought to examine, although not parties to the action, were so related to the acts which plaintiff must prove and the circumstances of their connection with the alleged wrongful conduct of defendants were such that we conclude that an examination ought to have been allowed.” To similar effect are the cases of *Peyton*v. *Coulson*(190 Misc. 754); *Bloch*v. *Ballin*(54 N. Y. S. 2d 205) ; *Kotopoulos*v. *Kotopoulos*(53 N. Y. S. 2d 932); and *Stevens*v. *Silverman*(157 Misc. 381). We think that special circumstances have been shown to exist justifying the taking of the deposition of each of these persons as a witness under section 288 of the Civil Practice Act.

Dore, J. P., Callahan and Shientag, JJ., concur in decision; Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent in part and vote to eliminate only item 14, in opinion.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion denied. No opinion. Settle order on notice.
### §60302. Capital prosecution improvement grants

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall award grants to States for the purpose of enhancing the ability of prosecutors to effectively represent the public in State capital cases.

#### (b) Use of funds

#### (1) Permitted uses

Grants awarded under subsection (a) shall be used for one or more of the following:

(A) To design and implement training programs for State and local prosecutors to ensure effective representation in State capital cases.

(B) To develop and implement appropriate standards and qualifications for State and local prosecutors who litigate State capital cases.

(C) To assess the performance of State and local prosecutors who litigate State capital cases, provided that such assessment shall not include participation by the assessor in the trial of any specific capital case.

(D) To identify and implement any potential legal reforms that may be appropriate to minimize the potential for error in the trial of capital cases.

(E) To establish a program under which State and local prosecutors conduct a systematic review of cases in which a death sentence was imposed in order to identify cases in which post-conviction DNA testing may be appropriate.

(F) To provide support and assistance to the families of murder victims.

#### (2) Prohibited use

Grants awarded under subsection (a) shall not be used to fund, directly or indirectly, the prosecution of specific capital cases.

(Pub. L. 108–405, title IV, §422, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2288.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14163a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.