alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 182 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 182

 To make permanent the authority to waive restrictions on use of funds 
  for threat reduction in States of the former Soviet Union and for a 
            chemical weapons destruction facility in Russia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Schiff (for himself, Mr. Spratt, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Edwards, Mr. 
  Crowley, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Berman, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
  Shays, Ms. Harman, and Mr. Brown of Ohio) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in 
 addition to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make permanent the authority to waive restrictions on use of funds 
  for threat reduction in States of the former Soviet Union and for a 
            chemical weapons destruction facility in Russia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Threat Reduction Implementation Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT WAIVER OF RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS FOR THREAT 
              REDUCTION IN STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION.

    Section 1306 of the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-314) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``only with respect to 
        fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005'' and inserting ``with 
        respect to fiscal year 2003 and each fiscal year thereafter'';
            (2) by striking subsection (d); and
            (3) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (d).

SEC. 3. PERMANENT WAIVER OF RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CHEMICAL 
              WEAPONS DESTRUCTION.

    Section 8144 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2003 
(Public Law 107-248; 116 Stat. 1571) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and any fiscal year thereafter'' after 
        ``2003'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b); and
            (3) by striking ``(a)''.
                                 <all>
```
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Blue Mountain & Reading Railroad Company

JUN 1 9 2002

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status ofthe Blue Mountain & Reading Railroad Company (BM&R)

(B.A. No. 3355) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 231, et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 351, et seq.) (RUIA). The BM&R was ruled to be an employer under the RRA

and RUIA effective October 13, 1983.

Mr. Philip Geschwindt, Director ofAccounting for the Reading Blue Mountain and

Northern Railroad Company, B.A. NO. 3377, reported that BM&R operations 

ceased on July 1, 1995 and that its employees were last compensated on June 30,

1995. All rail operations ofBM&R were abandoned and BM&R was dissolved as

a corporation and liquidated its assets as of December 31, 1997.

Based on the above information, it is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement

Board that the Blue Mountain and Reading Railroad Company ceased to be an

employer under the RRA and RUIA on July 1, 1995, the day operations ceased.

Cherryl T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

erome F. Kever

BA# 3355
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Kirk
Billingsley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.

                                          /s/ L. KIRK BILLINGSLEY
                                          ---------------------------
                                          L. Kirk Billingsley
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          May 1, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 202 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 202

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an inflation 
adjustment of the base amounts used in determining the amount of Social 
              Security benefits included in gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an inflation 
adjustment of the base amounts used in determining the amount of Social 
              Security benefits included in gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF BASE AMOUNTS USED IN DETERMINING 
              AMOUNT OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS INCLUDED IN GROSS 
              INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 86 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to base amount and adjusted base amount) 
is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning in a calendar year after 2003, each dollar 
        amount contained in paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be increased 
        by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                2002' for `calendar year 1992'.
        If any increase determined under the preceding sentence is not 
        a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the next 
        lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Manchester Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the

Company.



Date: July 15, 2004





/s/ Jackson Buch

------------------------------------

Jackson Buch

Principal Financial Officer
#### Oscar B. London, Respondent, *v.*Jennie Joslovitz, Individually and as Executrix of Jacob Joslovitz, Deceased, Appellant.

Third Department,

January 9, 1952.

*281
      *Alexander Pfeiffer,*for appellant.

*Arthur B. Ewig*and *Abraham Streifer,*for respondent.

*Per*Curiam.

Plaintiff was the lessee of certain business property owned by defendant under a lease which expired on February 28,1951. The rental was $373.33 per month, plus some tax payments. The lease contained an option to purchase which is the subject of this litigation between the parties. The plaintiff contends that the option is absolute and seeks specific performance and a conveyance of the premises. Defendant contends the option was a conditional one and amounted only to a *“*first refusal.” We are not concerned with the merits of that litigation which is pending and cannot be tried at the earliest until sometime in 1952. Since March 1, 1951, plaintiff has been occupying the premises without the payment of any rent, and continues to do so. Defendant is obliged to pay the taxes and some other expenses. In the event plaintiff is successful in this action and the premises are conveyed to him, the terms of payment call for an immediate down payment of $5,000 in cash.

*282Defendant made this motion for an order directing the plaintiff to pay an amount equal to the rent on the basis of the lease, the same to be applied upon the down payment of $5,000 if the property is subsequently conveyed to him. The court at Special Term denied the motion, both for lack of power and in its discretion.

There should be no question of power or authority. This is an action in equity. The power of equity is as broad as equity and justice require, whether by motion in an action, or by action. There is no other limitation. The fact that there is no precedent for the precise relief sought is of no consequence. On the merits there would seem to be no sound reason for denying the motion. Though the plaintiff’s claim may be all meritorious, the defendant has a right to present her contentions to a court of justice. She may not be said at this stage of the proceedings to have caused this situation. In the meantime the plaintiff is occupying the premises rent free while the defendant is paying substantial expenses connected with the property. If plaintiff is unsuccessful in the action he would be liable for the rent — if he is successful he will receive credit upon the down payment which will be immediately due. It appears without dispute, and was conceded by plaintiff’s counsel on argument, that plaintiff will be in no way harmed by granting the relief sought. In the meantime defendant, is being harmed. That should be the answer to the equities and to the motion.

The order should be reversed and the motion granted, with $10 costs.

Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, on the law and facts, and motion granted, with $10 costs.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Paul Minichiello, C.F.O., Treasurer and Director of Manchester Inc., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Manchester Inc.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact

or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances

under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this

quarterly report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this

quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and

cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the

registrant and have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to

the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those

entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of February

28, 2004 (the Evaluation Date);



c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls

and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to

the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons

performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely the

registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the

registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a

significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there

were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal

controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with

regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:  April 14, 2005                                              /s/ Paul Minichiello

---------------------------------------------------------

Paul Minichiello, Treasurer and Director

Principal Financial Officer
### **CHAPTER 202—AIR FORCE SERGEANTS ASSOCIATION**

Sec.
20201.
Definition.
20202.
Organization.
20203.
Purposes.
20204.
Membership.
20205.
Governing body.
20206.
Powers.
20207.
Restrictions.
20208.
Duty to maintain corporate and tax-exempt status.
20209.
Records and inspection.
20210.
Service of process.
20211.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
20212.
Annual report.
<PAGE>   1
MULTIMEDIA GAMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Re:  Multimedia Games, Inc.
     Registration on Form S-3 and S-8


We are aware that our report dated May 6, 1997 on our review of the interim
financial information of Multimedia Games, Inc. for the periods ended 
March 31, 1997, and included in this Form 10-QSB is incorporated by reference 
in the Company's registration statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-16729) and 
on Form S-8 (File No. 333-23123). Pursuant to Rule 436 (C) under the Securities 
Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part of the registration 
statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 
of that Act.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Tulsa, Oklahoma
May 13, 1997
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-037 March 21, 2007

NRC ANNOUNCES HEARING OPPORTUNITY AND INTENT TO DEVELOP

ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT ON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the opportunity to request a hearing on a

license renewal application for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant in North Carolina. The agency

will also hold a public meeting near the plant to discuss the license renewal process and the scope of its

review of the environmental impacts of the proposed renewal.

Carolina Power & Light Co., doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas Inc., submitted the

license renewal application for Shearon Harris Nov. 16. The application was formally docketed Jan. 12,

but because the NRC was operating under a continuing resolution that held federal spending at the

Fiscal Year 2006 level, the staff’s technical and environmental reviews were delayed. Now that the

NRC has received its requested funding for FY 2007, those reviews will proceed.

The Harris nuclear plant is located in Wake County, N.C., about 20 miles south of Raleigh. Its

current operating license expires Oct. 24, 2026. Renewal would extend that license for an additional 20

years.

NRC staff will conduct a public meeting April 18 in the vicinity of the plant to explain the

license renewal review process and to seek public input on issues to be considered in the agency’s

Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed renewal. Details of that meeting will be announced

separately closer to the date.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing was published March 20 in the Federal Register.

The deadline for requesting a hearing is May 21. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest may

be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. 

A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of

the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Requests may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101

or e-mail to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov. A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of the

General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov.
Information on the NRC’s hearings process is available at this Web address:

http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html. Information on the Atomic Safety

and Licensing Board Panel, which will consider hearing requests and conduct any adjudication, is

available here: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/organization/aslbpfuncdesc.html.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### State of Nebraska v. Union Pacific Railroad Company.

Filed February 28, 1911.

No. 16,534.

Original action by the state. Demurrer to petition.

*Demurrer overruled.*

*William, T. Thompson, Attorney General,*and *Grant G. Martm,*for plaintiff:

*N. E. Loomis, Edson Rich, J. A. Sheean*and *E. F. Pettis, contra.*

Sedgwick, J,

This is a companion case to *State v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., ante,*p. 669. There was a general demurrer to the petition in this case also. For the reasons there given, the demurrer is

Overruled.

Barnes, J., dissents.

Letton, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1817 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1817

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a dredging project 
to increase the depth of Menominee Harbor, Menomiee River, Michigan and 
                  Wisconsin, from 24 feet to 26 feet.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2003

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a dredging project 
to increase the depth of Menominee Harbor, Menomiee River, Michigan and 
                  Wisconsin, from 24 feet to 26 feet.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the project for 
navigation, Menominee Harbor and River, Michigan and Wisconsin, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 
482) and deauthorized on April 15, 2002, in accordance with section 
1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
579a(b)(2); 100 Stat. 4201), may be carried out by the Secretary of the 
Army.
                                 <all>
```
### §151902. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are to raise from private sources, administer, and disperse funds for medical education, and in carrying out those purposes, to take other appropriate action to promote—

(1) the interpretation of the needs of medical education to the American public;

(2) the encouragement of the growth, development, and advancement of constantly improving standards and methods in the education and training of all medical personnel in the United States; and

(3) the preservation of academic freedom in the institutions of medical education.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1408.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151902 | 36:603. | Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1036, §3, 68 Stat. 892. |

Section

The words "in carrying out those purposes" are substituted for "in connection therewith" for clarity. In clause (2), the word "personnel" is substituted for "manpower" to use a word that is gender-neutral.