alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward P. Hurley, Respondent, *v.*Alfred R. Hurley et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

First Department,

February 26, 1952.

*416*John L. Seymour*for appellants.

*Sidney S. Levine*of counsel *(Levine & MecTder,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The complaint purports to cast the defendants in the position of trustees of certain real property in which the decedent, father of the plaintiff and of one of the defendants-appellants and husband of the other defendant-appellant, is alleged to have had the beneficial interest and power of disposition during his life. The charge of the complaint is that the defendants have been in possession and have collected the emoluments and rents of the property since decedent’s death and have failed, refused and -neglected to account to plaintiff or to the estate.

Assuming that the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to allege a trust duty on the part of defendants in relation to plaintiff and a breach thereof, the action is upon its face barred by the ten-year Statute of Limitations. It is clear from the complaint that if any duty devolved upon defendants to act as trustees in relation to plaintiff, or to account to him or to the estate, it accrued on June 18, 1939, when the decedent died. Plaintiff by reason of his alleged position in the matter knew *417at that time of whatever rights he or the estate might have, and any such rights should have been asserted within ten years from that date *(Lammer*v. *Staddard,*103 N. Y. 672; *Hifler v. Calmac Oil & Gas Corp.,*258 App. Div. 78, 89). It is no excuse that an administrator was not appointed for several years because of plaintiff’s belatedly petitioning for the appointment of an administrator.

If the allegation at the end of the complaint that1 ‘ defendants have refused to account therefor after demand ”, without stating when demand was made, is intended to suggest that the statute should begin to run only from the date of demand and that belated demand saves the case from the statute, the answer is that it is clear upon the facts as alleged in the present complaint that the plaintiff should have made a timely demand, if he felt one was in order, and that such demand should have been made about the time of decedent’s death. Eleven years having elapsed before suit was instituted, it is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

The orders appealed from, insofar as they deny a dismissal of the complaint on the ground of the Statute of Limitations, should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs to appellants.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voobhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Orders, insofar as they deny a dismissal of the complaint on the ground of the Statute of Limitations, unanimously reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellants. Settle order on notice.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 48]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ048.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 261]]

Public Law 107-48
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2002, and 
     for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 12, 2001 -  [H.J. Res. 68]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 107-44 is 
amended by striking ``October 16, 2001'' in section <<NOTE: Ante, p. 
255.>>  107(c) and inserting in lieu thereof ``October 23, 2001''; by 
adding the following before the semicolon in section 
101(b)(1) <<NOTE: Ante, p. 254.>>  ``: Provided, That the rate for 
operations of the Defense Health Program may exceed the current rate as 
may be necessary to fund a pro rata share of the program expansion 
authorized by section 712(a) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-398)''; by 
striking section 115 <<NOTE: Ante, p. 256.>>  and adding the following:

    ``Sec. 115. Notwithstanding the dates specified in section 7 of the 
Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 (12 U.S.C. 635f) and section 1(c) of 
Public Law 103-428, the Export-Import Bank of the United States shall 
continue to exercise its functions in connection with and in furtherance 
of its objects and purposes through the date specified in section 107(c) 
of this joint resolution.''; and adding the following new section:
    ``Sec. 123. Notwithstanding section 107, funds shall be available 
and obligations for mandatory payments due on or about November 1, 2001, 
may continue to be made.''.

    Approved October 12, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 68:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Oct. 11, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-007 March 1, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO CONDUCT SPECIAL INSPECTION

AT PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection to evaluate problems

related to a new steam generator and the operation of the shutdown cooling system at the Palo

Verde Nuclear Generating Station, located 50 miles west of Phoenix, Arizona.

On February 19, operators shut down Palo Verde Unit 2 after monitors detected a minute

leak in one of two steam generators that had been replaced last fall. Despite some problems

subsequently encountered, the plant remained in a safe condition at all times and there was no

danger to public health or safety. After the reactor cooled, operators reduced the level of water in

the reactor coolant system to facilitate access to the leaking steam generator. However, problems

with some equipment led them to prolong the time that the plant remained in this condition. 

Workers discovered that air had displaced some of the water in the reactor shutdown cooling

system, forcing them to open valves to vent air into the auxiliary building every two hours.

 The NRC staff has decided to conduct a special inspection to evaluate the adequacy of

the licensee’s response to the situation, the root cause, and corrective actions.

The NRC’s Special Inspection Team, consisting of two reactor engineers from the NRC’s

Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas, an inspector from the Callaway nuclear plant in Missouri,

and a Headquarters specialist, arrived on site last week and have begun their review.

The inspection report will be issued about four weeks after the inspection is completed,

and will be available on the agency’s web site and through its Electronic Reading Room at:

http//www.nrc.gov as an Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS)

document. Help in using ADAMS is available through the NRC Public Document Room at 301-

417-4737 or 1-800-397-4209.

###
NRC PUBLISHES ANNUAL SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT TO CONGRESS 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public an 

unclassified version of an annual report to Congress outlining the previous year’s security 

inspection program. The report covers the security inspection program, including force-on-force 

exercises, for commercial power reactors and certain fuel cycle facilities for calendar year 2007. 

 According to the report, required under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the NRC 

conducted 199 security inspections at commercial power reactors, of which 22 were force-onforce inspections. These force-on-force inspections use a well-trained mock adversary force to 

test a facility’s ability to respond to the level of threat the facility is required to defend against. 

The 199 security inspections yielded 122 findings from these reviews, of which 117 were of very 

low security significance and five were of low to moderate security significance. The results of 

the security inspections conducted at Category I fuel cycle facilities are discussed in the 

Safeguards Information version of this report. 

 Under the security inspection program, licensees are expected to promptly fix or put 

compensatory measures in place if any potentially significant deficiencies are identified in the 

protective strategy of a plant. 

 “The NRC is committed to protecting the public health and safety, promoting the 

common defense and security, and protecting the environment. Conducting force-on-force 

exercises and implementing the security inspection program are just two of a number of 

regulatory oversight activities the NRC performs to ensure the secure use and management of 

radioactive materials by the commercial nuclear industry,” said NRC Chairman Dale E. Klein. 

 The report can be found on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/congress-docs/correspondence/2008/ . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-129

July 11, 2008
No. III-08-007 

Contacts: Viktoria Mitlyng 630-829-9662 

 Prema Chandrathil 630-829-9663 

 

 March 26, 2008 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Web site: www.nrc.gov

NRC RESPONDS TO UNUSUAL EVENT AT THE BYRON NUCLEAR PLANT

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has responded to an unusual event at the Byron 

Nuclear Power Plant. The unusual event was declared on March 25, at 6:49 PM. The NRC has 

continuously evaluated plant conditions since the event declaration. The two-unit facility, located 

about 25 miles southwest of Rockford, Ill., is operated by the Exelon Generation Company. 

 An unusual event is the lowest of four levels in the NRC’s emergency classification 

system. An unusual event is declared when events are in process or have occurred which indicate 

potential degradation in the level of safety of the plant. No release of radioactive material 

requiring offsite response or monitoring has occurred or is expected to occur. 

 “We activated the regional Incident Response Center as soon as the unusual event was 

declared to evaluate the utility’s response to the event. The plant is in a stable condition, “ said 

James Caldwell, Regional Administrator for the NRC’s mid-west region. “Our staff in the Lisle 

office, at NRC headquarters, and NRC inspectors at the plant monitored the plant overnight and 

will continue to do so until the problem has been corrected.” 

 The unusual event was declared when outside electrical power delivered to Byron Unit 2 

was interrupted due to a problem with electrical transformers. Both Byron units are in a stable 

condition. The incident presents no threat to public safety. 

 Byron Unit 1 is shut down for a refueling outage. Unit 2 did not shut down as a result of 

the off-site power loss. Unit 2 is sharing off-site power with Unit 1 and will continue to do so 

until off-site power to Unit 2 is restored. 

 The NRC will continue to evaluate the utility’s response to the event, its efforts to 

identify the root cause of the problem, the proposed actions to fix the problem and the 

implementation of repairs. 

### 

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail 

notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532
### §702a–3. Levees; raising and enlarging

The levees along the Mississippi River from the head of the Morganza Floodway to the head of the Atchafalaya River and down the east bank of the Atchafalaya River to intersection with the west protection levee of said Morganza Floodway shall be raised and enlarged to 1928 grade and section.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 548, §3, 49 Stat. 1509.)
EXHIBIT 99.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oregon Pacific Bancorp (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Joanne A. Forsberg, Secretary of the Company and Chief FinancialOfficer of Oregon Pacific Banking Co. (the “Bank”), certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: April 30, 2003
/s/ Joanne A. Forsberg
Joanne A. Forsberg
§ 831.661 Deposits not subject to waiver. ( a ) The deposits required to elect fully or partially reduced annuities under §§ 831.622, 831.631, 831.632, 831.682, 831.684, or 831.685 are not annuity overpayments and their collection is not subject to waiver. They are subject to reconsideration only to determine whether the amount has been correctly computed.
( b ) [Reserved]
[50 FR 20070, May 13, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 31935, Sept. 8, 1986; 57 FR 33597, July 29, 1992; 58 FR 52881, Oct. 13, 1993. Redesignated and amended at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
### §20332. Grants for juvenile and family court personnel

In order to improve the judicial system's handling of child abuse and neglect cases, the Administrator of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention shall make grants for the purpose of providing—

(1) technical assistance and training to judicial personnel and attorneys, particularly personnel and practitioners in juvenile and family courts; and

(2) administrative reform in juvenile and family courts.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title II, §222, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4797.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13022 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2102

To provide a cost-sharing requirement for the construction of the Arkansas 

Valley Conduit in the State of Colorado. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2003

Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself and Mr. MCINNIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To provide a cost-sharing requirement for the construction 

of the Arkansas Valley Conduit in the State of Colorado.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST-SHARING REQUIREMENT FOR THE AR4 KANSAS VALLEY CONDUIT IN THE STATE OF 

5 COLORADO. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7 of Public Law 87–590 

7 (76 Stat. 393) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘SEC. 7.’’ and inserting the fol9 lowing: ‘‘SEC. 7. AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO10 PRIATIONS.’’; 
2

•HR 2102 IH 

1 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘There is 

2 hereby authorized’’ and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(a) CONSTRUCTION.—There is authorized’’; 

4 (3) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘There 

5 are also’’ and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(b) OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE.—There are’’; 

7 and 

8 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(c) ARKANSAS VALLEY CONDUIT.—

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be 

11 appropriated such sums as are necessary to pay the 

12 Federal share of the costs of constructing the Ar13 kansas Valley Conduit in accordance with subsection 

14 (a) of the first section, which Federal share shall be 

15 nonreimbursable. 

16 ‘‘(2) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The non-Federal 

18 share of the total costs of construction (includ19 ing design and engineering costs) of the Arkan20 sas Valley Conduit shall be not more than 25 

21 percent. 

22 ‘‘(B) FORM.—Up to 100 percent of the 

23 non-Federal share may be in the form of in24 kind contributions.’’. 
3

•HR 2102 IH 

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub2 section (a) apply to any costs of constructing the Arkansas 

3 Valley Conduit incurred during fiscal year 2002 or any 

4 subsequent fiscal year.

Æ
# L_2015177EN.01000101.xml

| 8.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 177/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 177/1

---

Information concerning the signature of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and of Romania to the European Union

The above Protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon was signed in Brussels on 18 June 2015.

---
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT M ay 12, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 14802 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 0 4 0 - C R - T - 1 7 - T GW U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f- A p p e lle e , v ersu s V A L E N C I O V E N N E R W I L L I A M S , D e fe n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t ates D i stri ctC ou rt forthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l ori da

_________________________ ( M ay 12, 2006) B efo re B L A C K , C A R N E S an d B A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: J e rr y T h e o p h ilo p o u lo s , ap p o in te d c o u n s e l fo rV a le n c io V e n n e rW illia m s in2

thi s di r e c tc r i m i na lappe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a ti on of the appe l l a nta nd f

i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i for ni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 13 96 , 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the enti re re cord r e v e a ls th a t c o u n s e l’s a s s e s s m e n t o f th e r e la tiv e m e r it o f

th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c aus e i nde pe nde nte xa m i na ti on of the e nti r e r e c or d r e ve a l s no ar guabl e i s s ue s of m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o ti o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , a nd W i l l i a m s ’ s c onvi c ti ons and sent ence s are A FFI R M ED .
#### In the Matter of Peer Berge et al., Appellants, against Harold E. Hollister, as District Superintendent, Second Supervisory District, Westchester County, et al., Respondents.

*853Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
#### § 843.212 Lump-sum payments which include contributions made to a retirement system for employees of a nonappropriated fund instrumentality.

A lump-sum payment will include employee contributions and interest as provided under subpart G of part 847 of this chapter.

[61 FR 41721, Aug. 9, 1996]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

TERRENCE LEWIS,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 108 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2019, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00123

- CV

Elizabeth Beal v. Romeo Villa and Astrid Villa
On Appeal from the 464th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 1238

- 18

- L

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consi dered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 10 , 2021
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.213 What prices does OPM collect? ( a ) OPM surveys the price charged to the consumer at the time of the survey. The price includes any sales, excise, or general business tax passed on to the consumer at the time of sale and any discounts, mark-downs, or “sales” in progress at the time the price was collected.
( b ) *Exceptions:* ( 1 ) OPM does not collect coupon prices, clearance prices, going-out-of-business prices, or area-wide distress sale prices.
( 2 ) OPM prices automobiles at dealers and obtains the sticker (*i.e.,* non-negotiated) price for the model and specified options. The prices are the manufacturer's suggested retail price (including options), destination charges, additional shipping charges, appropriate dealer-added items or options, dealer mark-up, and taxes.
( 3 ) OPM estimates prices for selected items, such as health insurance and K-12 education, based on employee usage of the item. For example, OPM estimates health insurance prices based on the employee's share of the premium costs and weights reflecting Federal enrollment, as reported in OPM's Central Personnel Data File, in the various plans available to Federal employees in each area.
[67 FR 22340, May 3, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 59762, Oct. 6, 2004]
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

The following are subsidiaries of RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. as of December
31, 2000:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    State of
                                                                  Incorporation
                       Name                                      or Organization
----------------------------------------------------------     -------------------
<S>                                                            <C>
HMO Missouri, Inc. (BlueCHOICE)                                 Missouri
Diversified Life Insurance Agency of Missouri, Inc.             Missouri
Healthy Alliance Life Insurance Company                         Missouri
HealthLink, Inc.                                                Illinois
HealthLink HMO, Inc.                                            Missouri
The EPOCH Group, L.C.                                           Missouri
RightCHOICE Insurance Company                                   Illinois
Preferred Health Plans of Missouri, Inc.                        Missouri
4444 Forest Park Redevelopment Corporation                      Missouri
C&S Properties, Inc.                                            Missouri
R&P Realty, Inc.                                                Missouri
</TABLE>