alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.13

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO

                          CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated February 18,
2004 (the "Second Amendment"), is by and between Aequitas Ventures Corp. (the
"Consultant"), and NANNACO, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Client").

                                    RECITALS

      A. The Consultant and the Client entered into a Consulting Services
Agreement dated November 17, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
A (the "Agreement"), pursuant to which the Consultant agreed to provide certain
consulting services to the Client.

      B. The Consultant and the Client entered into an Amendment No. 1 to
Consulting Services Agreement dated January 12, 2004, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "First Amendment"), pursuant to which the
Consultant agreed to provide certain consulting services to the Client.

      C. Client and Consultant wish to amend Section 2 of the Agreement to
provide for additional consideration in exchange for additional consulting
services.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and the mutual
agreements, representations, warranties and covenants contained herein, and for
other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A.    Section 2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and is hereby
      amended to read as follows:

"2.   Consideration.

      Client agrees to pay Consultant, as his fee and as consideration for
services provided, 12,500,000 shares of common stock of the Client. By amendment
dated January 12, 2004 Client agrees to pay Consultant an additional 10,000,000
shares of common stock of the Client, which shares shall be registered on Form
S-8. By amendment dated February 18, 2004 Client agrees to pay Consultant an
additional 10,000,000 shares of common stock of the Client, which shares shall
be registered on Form S-8. Shares issued pursuant to this Second Amendment shall
be issued to Terry Byrne, the natural person performing the consulting services
for Client through Consultant.

(a)   Transfer Restrictions.


                                       1
<PAGE>

      All certificates representing such shares shall be subject to such stock
transfer orders, legends and other restrictions as Client may deem necessary or
advisable."

EXECUTED on the date first set forth above.

                                        CLIENT:

                                        NANNACO, INC.


                                        By:_____________________________________
                                        Andrew DeVries, III - CEO

                                        CONSULTANT:

                                        AEQUITAS VENTURES CORP.


                                        By:_____________________________________
                                        Name: Terry Byrne
                                        Its:


                                       2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company’) for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the ‘Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below hereby certifies, pursuant to IS U.S.C. Section *1350,*as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   | /s/ Thomas H. Holcom, Jr. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   | Thomas H. Holcom, Jr.     |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

May 14, 2008
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chaolei
Marketing and Finance Company for the period ending September 30,
2008, I,  Fan
Luo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chaolei
Marketing and Finance Company  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
            Such
      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending September
      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the period ended September 30, 2008, fairly represents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Chaolei Marketing and Finance Company




Date:
Octber 20, 2008





Chaolei
      Marketing and Finance CompanyBy: /s/
      Fan
      LuoFan
      Luo
              Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer
**Exhibit 31.4**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificationof the Chief Financial Officer of Insight Capital, Inc.**

I, John Abbot, certify that:

1)              I have reviewed thisannual report on Form 10-K of Insight Capital, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

2)              Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3)              Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a)                designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
|        | /s/ JOHN ABBOT               |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | John Abbot                   |
|   | Executive Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer     |
|   | March 29, 2007          |

 

----
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tortuga Mexican
Imports, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eduardo Avila, the Treasurer and Director (Principal
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: Janaury 14, 2010

Eduardo Avila

/s/ Eduardo Avila(Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Edward Polhill, Respondent, against Masell Mfg. Co. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from an award of compensation made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board for 100% permanent loss of use of claimant’s right thumb. Claimant sustained accidental injuries which required the amputation of the distal phalange and a part of the proximal phalange of his right thumb. The board has found that the effects of his injuries constituted a 100% permanent loss of the use of the thumb. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Brewster, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.
# L_2018080EN.01003401.xml

| 22.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 80/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 191/2016

of 23 September 2016

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2018/447]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/68 of 21 January 2016 on common procedures and specifications necessary for the interconnection of electronic registers of driver cards (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/68 of 21 January 2016 on common procedures and specifications necessary for the interconnection of electronic registers of driver cards (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 21b (Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘21ba. | 32016 R 0068: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/68 of 21 January 2016 on common procedures and specifications necessary for the interconnection of electronic registers of driver cards (OJ L 15, 22.1.2016, p. 51).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘21ba.

32016 R 0068: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/68 of 21 January 2016 on common procedures and specifications necessary for the interconnection of electronic registers of driver cards (OJ L 15, 22.1.2016, p. 51).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/68 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 September 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 122/2016 of 3 June 2016 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 15, 22.1.2016, p. 51.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 308, 23.11.2017, p. 27, and EEA Supplement No 76, 23.11.2017, p. 32.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report") of Global Envirotech, Inc. (the "Company") I, Carl
Urich,  President,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: October 1, 2004

/s/Carl Urich
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Urich, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


     This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered December 4, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00755 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0075 6 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0075 7 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0075 8 - CR KAMERON HALL, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F16 - 35022 - H , F16 - 3502 3 - H , F16 - 3502 4 - H & F16 - 3502 5 - H 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due on or before December 10, 2018.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1554-DR]


Georgia; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Georgia (FEMA-1554-DR), dated September 18, 2004, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective October 30, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-25038 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65499-65500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 34600]


Progressive Rail, Incorporated--Lease and Operation Exemption--
Rail Lines of Wisconsin Central, Ltd.

    Progressive Rail, Incorporated (PGR), a Class III rail carrier, has 
filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to lease from 
Wisconsin Central, Ltd. and operate 23.97 miles of rail line consisting 
of (1) the Almena-Cameron Branch that extends between milepost 80.88 at 
or near Almena and milepost 97.80 at or near Cameron, a distance of 
16.92 miles in Barron County, WI, and (2) the Rice Lake-Cameron Branch 
that extends between milepost 49.0 at or near Cameron and milepost 
56.05 at or near Rice Lake, a

[[Page 65500]]

distance of 7.05 miles in Barron County.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The rail line in the instant transaction was the subject of 
a notice of exemption originally filed by Wisconsin Northern 
Railroad Company, LLC (WNRC), a subsidiary of PGR, and voluntarily 
withdrawn by WNRC. See Wisconsin Northern Railroad Company, LLC--
Lease and Operation Exemption--Rail Lines of Wisconsin Central Ltd. 
STB Finance Docket No. 34596 (STB served Oct. 22, 2004). The rail 
line in the instant transaction also connects in Barron County, WI, 
to another PGR rail line recently acquired in Progressive Rail, 
Incorporated--Lease and Operation Exemption--Rail Line of Union 
Pacific Railroad Company, STB Finance Docket No. 34597 (STB served 
Oct. 29, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    PGR certifies that its projected revenues as a result of this 
transaction will not result in the creation of a Class II or Class I 
rail carrier. The transaction was scheduled to be consummated no sooner 
than October 27, 2004, the effective date of the exemption (7 days 
after the exemption was filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 34600, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, 1925 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a 
copy of each pleading must be served on: Thomas F. McFarland, P.C., 208 
South LaSalle St., Suite 1890, Chicago, IL 60604-1112.
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov.

    Decided: November 3, 2004.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-25054 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### Leonidas Gariepy, Appellant, v. Coney Island and Brooklyn Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
### §21106. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1293.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21106 | 36:2402. | June 12, 1984, Pub. L. 98–314, §2, 98 Stat. 237. |

Section

The words "and subject to the laws of such State or States" are omitted as unnecessary.
Board Coverage Decision

2010-44.3

Chicago Railway Hotel Ticket Office

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 7236
### §151508. Duty to maintain corporate and tax-exempt status

(a) Corporate Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as a corporation incorporated under the laws of Illinois.

(b) Tax-Exempt Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1403.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151508(a) | 36:2008(f). | Aug. 9, 1982, Pub. L. 97–231, §§8(f), 15 (1st sentence), 96 Stat. 257, 258. |
| 151508(b) | 36:2014 (1st sentence). | |

Section
On a national level, there is no obvious trend in the data; 

Region III grades show a slight decline over the past 4 yeaRegion IV is down this year.

RO Average Written Grades

90

100

50607080

19911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007

Fiscal Year

Grades (%)
Here again, we don't see any significant tren

performance. Failures are rare.

RO Operating Test Pass-Rates

90

100

%)

50607080

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Fiscal Year

Pass-Rate (%
The national results are flat. Region III is down slightly, but one 200

2 low-grade failures had a big impact due to the small sample size of exams year-to-date. Similarly, Region IV had one exam with 3 low-gr(appeals are pending in both cases).

SRO Average Written Grades

90

100

50607080

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Fiscal Year

Grades (%)
We added an SRO only grade and cut-score (70% if taken 

RO portion and 80% if taken alone) to the exam in 2003. applicants generally score 2 – 3% lower on this portion of 

SRO-Only Written Exam Grades

80 085.090.095.0

100.0

%) 

50.055.060.065.070.075.080.0

2003 2004 2005 2006 200

Fiscal Year

NOTE: The Region III 2003 data includes only two exams, one of which had unusually poor re

Percent (%
The Region IV pass-rate is down after two years with no f

3 applicants on one exam had passed, the pass-rate would rather than 88%.

SRO Operating Test Pass-Rates

8090

100

%) 

50607080

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Fiscal Year

Pass-Rate (%
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-3and S-8 (Nos. 333-114413, 333-99711, 333-40740, 333-54162, 333-110419, and333-114414) of Avocent Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2005 relatingto the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|--------------------------------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |
| Birmingham, Alabama            |
| March 14, 2005                 |

 

1

----