alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMG Oil Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Garth Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Garth Johnson                | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|                               | 
|Name: Garth Johnson            | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 
|December 18, 2008              | 

---
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of Nortek, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their
knowledge:





1.
            the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 3, 2009
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the fiscal quarter ended October 3, 2009 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Richard L.
Bready


Name: Richard L.
Bready


Title:    President
and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Almon C.
Hall


Name: Almon C.
Hall


Title:    Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
GAO-01-1088R National Society, Daughters of the American Colonists

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

August 21, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the National Society, Daughters of the American Colonists for

Fiscal Year 2000

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

National Society, Daughters of the American Colonists, a federally chartered

corporation, for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2000. The corporation provides

scholarships and awards, publishes a yearbook, and participates in a variety of

patriotic projects.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

! present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

! obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

! submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-1088R National Society, Daughters of the American Colonists

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(194062)
### §1951. Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to address the adverse impacts of marine debris on the United States economy, the marine environment (including waters in the jurisdiction of the United States, the high seas, and waters in the jurisdiction of other countries), and navigation safety through the identification, determination of sources, assessment, prevention, reduction, and removal of marine debris.

(Pub. L. 109–449, §2, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3333; Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §603, Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1576; Pub. L. 116–224, title I, §101(1), Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1074.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–224 substituted "marine environment (including waters in the jurisdiction of the United States, the high seas, and waters in the jurisdiction of other countries)," for "marine environment,".

2012—Pub. L. 112–213 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The purposes of this chapter are—

"(1) to help identify, determine sources of, assess, reduce, and prevent marine debris and its adverse impacts on the marine environment and navigation safety;

"(2) to reactivate the Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating Committee; and

"(3) to develop a Federal marine debris information clearinghouse."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2012 Amendment

Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §601, Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1576, provided that: "This title [amending this section and sections 1952 to 1956 of this title, transferring section 1914 of this title to section 1954 of this title, repealing sections 1915 and 1954 of this title, and amending provisions set out as a note under this section] may be cited as the 'Marine Debris Act Amendments of 2012'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 109–449, §1, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3333, as amended by Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §602(a), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1576, provided that: "This Act [enacting and amending this chapter] may be cited as the 'Marine Debris Act'."
#### Virchand Panachand & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Ameximpo, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 839.302 Will my employer give me a written explanation? ( a ) Your employer must provide you with written notice of the error. The notice must include an explanation of the error, your options regarding the error, and any time limits that apply.
( b ) Your employer must inform you if they find that you do not have a retirement coverage error.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ken Cabianca, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Kenneth Cabianca


Kenneth Cabianca


President


Principal Executive Officer







Date: September 14, 2012
§ 831.622 Changes of election after final adjudication. ( a ) Except as provided in section 8339 (j) or (k) of title 5, United States Code, or §§ 831.682, 831.684, 831.685, or paragraph (b) of this section, an employee or Member may not revoke or change the election or name another survivor later than 30 days after the date of the first regular monthly payment.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in § 831.613 and paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, a retiree who was married at the time of retirement and has elected a self-only annuity, or a partially reduced annuity to provide a current spouse annuity, or a fully reduced annuity or a partially reduced annuity to provide a former spouse annuity, or an insurable interest annuity may elect, no later than 18 months after the time of retirement, an annuity reduction or an increased annuity reduction to provide a current spouse annuity.
( 2 ) A current spouse annuity based on an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section cannot be paid if it will, when combined with any former spouse annuity or annuities that are required by court order, exceed the maximum survivor annuity permitted under § 831.641.
( 3 ) To make an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the retiree must pay, in full, a deposit determined under § 831.662, plus interest, at the rate provided under § 831.105(g), no later than 18 months after the time of retirement.
( 4 ) If a retiree makes an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section and is prevented from paying the deposit within the 18-month time limit because OPM did not send him or her a notice of the amount of the deposit at least 30 days before the time limit expires, the time limit for making the deposit will be extended to 30 days after OPM sends the notice of the amount of the deposit.
( 5 ) An election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, cancels any spousal consent under § 831.611 to the extent of the election.
( 6 ) An election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is void unless it is filed with OPM before the retiree dies.
( 7 ) If a retiree who had elected a fully reduced annuity or a partially reduced annuity to provide a former spouse annuity or former spouse annuities makes an election under paragraph (b)(1) of this section which would cause the combined current spouse annuity and former spouse annuity (or annuities) to exceed the maximum allowed under § 831.641, the former spouse annuity (or annuities) must be reduced to not exceed the maximum allowable under § 831.641.
[51 FR 31932, Sept. 8, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 52881, Oct. 13, 1993. Redesignated at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 20, 2007

Mr. Robert Underwood

P.O. Box 1138

Carthage, TX 75633

Mr. Steven M. Dowd

Law Offices of Steven M. Dowd

8140 N. Mopac Exwy., Bldg. 1, Suite 120

Austin, TX 78759

RE:Case Number:  04-0729

Court of Appeals Number:  06-03-00071-CV

Trial Court Number:  2002-328

Style:TOMMY JOE HOLMES

v.

ALAN BRAD KENT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF LINDA ANN MCWHORTER, DECEASED, AND CASSIE ELIZABETH KENT

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals’ judgment and renders judgment.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 04-0729Page 1**
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Henry Schectman, Appellant, against John F. Foster, as Warden of Auburn State Prison, Respondent.

Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCum, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
### §10495. Award of grants; limitation

#### (a) Grant distribution

In approving grants under this subchapter, the Attorney General shall assure an equitable distribution of assistance among the States, among urban and rural areas of the United States, and among urban and rural areas of a State.

#### (b) Duration

The Attorney General may award a grant each fiscal year, not to exceed $100,000 to a State or local law enforcement agency or $250,000 to a law enforcement organization for a period not to exceed 5 years. In any application from a State or local law enforcement agency or organization for a grant to continue a program for the second, third, fourth, or fifth fiscal year following the first fiscal year in which a grant was awarded to such agency, the Attorney General shall review the progress made toward meeting the objectives of the program. The Attorney General may refuse to award a grant if the Attorney General finds sufficient progress has not been made toward meeting such objectives, but only after affording the applicant notice and an opportunity for reconsideration.

#### (c) Limitation

Not more than 5 percent of grant funds received by a State or a local law enforcement agency or organization may be used for administrative purposes.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2305, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXI, §210201(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2063.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796jj–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05111**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 05111\05111_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05111\05111_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05111\05111_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05111\05111_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05111\05111_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05111\Certification Statement Plant ID 05111.pdf Plant certification statement 05111\Supplemental Documents\05111_aerial map.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 05111\Supplemental Documents\05111_Bottom Ash PID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05111\Supplemental Documents\05111_Deadline Extension Approval.pdf Follow-up correspondence with EPA.

05111\Supplemental Documents\05111_FLY ASH PID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05111\Supplemental Documents\05111_S4_Water Discharge Sketch_091509.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05111\05111_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05111\05111_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
No: II-08-037 July 3, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC STAFF TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING TO 

DISCUSS INSPECTION FINDINGS AT FARLEY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials of the Farley nuclear 

power plant in Dothan, Ala., on Thursday, July 10, to discuss the results of a Supplemental 

Inspection conducted at the plant June 2 – 13 to review corrective actions taken regarding 

regulatory concerns related to component operating problems at the plant. 

 The meeting will be held at 3 p.m. (CDT) at the Dothan Chamber of Commerce, 182 

Jamestown Blvd., in Dothan. The meeting, between officials of the NRC and the Farley nuclear 

power plant, will be open to observation by members of the public. NRC officials will be 

available at the close of the business portion, but before the meeting ends, to answer questions 

from interested observers. 

An NRC inspection report will be available within 30 days of the date of the meeting and will be 

available on the web at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

###

 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2480

DARRELL E. BYRD, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOE ROGERS; CHAMBERS USA WASTE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-89-3)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell E. Byrd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jon David Becker, JON D.

BECKER & ASSOCIATES, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Ruth Litvin,

DIAMONSTEIN, BECKER & STALEY, P.L.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Darrell E. Byrd, Sr. appeals the district court's order

entering judgment in favor of the Defendants in this action filed

under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C.

§ 621 et seq. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Byrd v. Rogers, No. CA-96-89-3

(E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
(October 29, 1951.)

#### Louis Appelbaum, Appellant, v. Frieda Appelbaum, Respondent.

Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
### §153. How issued

Patents shall be issued in the name of the United States of America, under the seal of the Patent and Trademark Office, and shall be signed by the Director or have his signature placed thereon and shall be recorded in the Patent and Trademark Office.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 804; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §§13203(c), 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902, 1906.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §39 (R.S. 4883, amended (1) Feb. 18, 1888, ch. 15, 25 Stat. 40, (2) April 11, 1903, ch. 417, 32 Stat. 95, (3) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §5, 42 Stat. 391).

The phrases referring to the attesting officers and to the recording of the patents are broadened.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 107–273, §13203(c), struck out "and attested by an officer of the Patent and Trademark Office designated by the Director," after "signature placed thereon".

1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, §13206(b)(1)(B), substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
§ 838.502 Expressly dividing a refund of employee contributions. ( a ) A court order directed at a refund of employee contributions is not a court order acceptable for processing unless it expressly awards a former spouse a portion of a refund of employee contributions as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) To expressly award a former spouse a portion of a refund of employee contributions as required by paragraph (a) of this section, the court order must— ( 1 ) Identify the retirement system using terms that are sufficient to identify the retirement system as explained in § 838.611; and
( 2 ) Expressly state that the former spouse is entitled to a portion of a refund of employee contributions using terms that are sufficient to identify the refund of employee contributions as explained in § 838.612.
#### Ernest David, Respondent, v. Christian J. Wolfarth et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of South Shore Motor Transportation Company, et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ.
Order filed November 10, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00826

- CV

____________ GERALD LEE RICKS , Appellant

V. ANTHONY GUNN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. 14

- CV

- 1095



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 28, 2015. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying co sts has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before November 25, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Ifappellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
### §150411. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete books and records of accounts;

(2) minutes of any proceeding of the corporation involving any member of the corporation, the board of directors, or any committee having authority under the board of directors; and

(3) at the principal office of the corporation, a record of the names and addresses of all members of the corporation having the right to vote.

(b) Inspection.—

(1) In general.—All books and records of the corporation may be inspected by any member having the right to vote, or by any agent or attorney of such a member, for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(2) Effect.—Nothing in this section contravenes—

(A) the laws of the jurisdiction under which the corporation is incorporated; or

(B) the laws of those jurisdictions within the United States and its territories within which the corporation carries out activities in furtherance of the purposes of the corporation.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 937.)
### §130112. Annual report

Not later than March 1 of each year, the corporation shall submit a report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report may consist of a report on the proceedings of the national convention. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1373.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130112 | 36:78n. | June 17, 1959, Pub. L. 86–47, §15, 73 Stat. 79. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 201 of House Document No. 103–7.