alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Morris Davidoff, Suing on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellant-Respondent, v. Elsie A. Seidenberg, as Executrix of Henry J. Seidenberg, Deceased, et al., Respondents-Appellants, and William Davidoff, Respondent.

In our opinion, the complaint does not set forth a sufficient cause for the intervention of the court to compel the declaration of a dividend. It does not allege facts showing the financial condition of the defendant corporation, its assets and liabilities in addition to the naked assertion of a surplus in a stated amount, and why such surplus, together with any moneys which the defendant officers-direetors may be required to repay to the corporation, is not needed in the business of the corporation. *(Nauss*v. *Nauss Bros. Co.,*195 App. Div. 318, 325.) Paragraphs 7 and 8 of the complaint, which allege, respectively, that no dividend was declared during the five years in question, and that the corporation has an earned surplus in excess of $107,000, admittedly relate only to the claim with regard to the failure to declare dividends. They have no relevancy to the cause of action for alleged misappropriation of corporate earnings. It is our further opinion that plaintiff should have the opportunity of pleading properly his claim with regard to the failure of the officers-direetors to declare dividends, as to which cause of action defendant William Davidoff, as a director, would be a proper party defendant. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 838.423 OPM action on receipt of a court order acceptable for processing. ( a ) If OPM receives a court order acceptable for processing that is directed at a refund of employee contributions, OPM will inform— ( 1 ) The former spouse— ( i ) That the court order is acceptable for processing;
( ii ) Of the date on which OPM received the court order;
( iii ) Whether OPM has a record of unrefunded employee contributions on the employee;
( iv ) That the former spouse's share of the refund of employee contributions cannot be paid unless the employee separates from the Federal service and applies for a refund of employee contributions;
( v ) To the extent possible, the formula that OPM will use to compute the former spouse's share of a refund of employee contributions; and
( vi ) That, if the former spouse disagrees with the formula, the former spouse must obtain, and submit to OPM, an amended court order clarifying the amount; and
( 2 ) The employee or separated employee— ( i ) That the former spouse has applied for benefits under this subpart;
( ii ) That the court order is acceptable for processing and that OPM must comply with the court order;
( iii ) Of the date on which OPM received the court order;
( iv ) That the former spouse's share of the refund of employee contributions cannot be paid unless the employee separates from the Federal service and applies for a refund of employee contributions;
( v ) To the extent possible, the formula that OPM will use to compute the former spouse's share of the refund of employee contributions;
( vi ) That, if he or she contests the validity of the court order, he or she must obtain, and submit to OPM, a court order invalidating the court order submitted by the former spouse; and
( vii ) That, if he or she disagrees with the formula, he or she must obtain, and submit to OPM, an amended court order clarifying the amount.
( b ) The failure of OPM to provide, or of the employee or separated employee or the former spouse to receive, the information specified in this section does not affect the validity of payment under the court order.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program 
(5587).
    Date: January 22, 2019.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Lyle Furr, Scientific Review Officer, Office of 
Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 4227, MSC 9550, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
9550, (301) 827-5702, lf33c.nih.gov.

 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 19, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-28013 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §150501. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "State" includes the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1389.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150501 | 36:420. | Apr. 3, 1952, ch. 131, §20, 66 Stat. 41. |

Section
B.C.D. 04-59

DEC 0 2 2004

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Western Rail Switching, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the status of Western Rail Switching, Inc., as an employer under the 

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et sea.) and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et sea.).

Information regarding Western Rail was provided by Todd Havens,

President and Co-Owner. According to Mr. Havens, Western Rail

began doing business October 11,2004. Western Rail currently has

two employees.

In Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No. 34546, decided

September 24, 2004, Western Rail filed a notice of exemption to

operate, pursuant to an agreement with Spokane County,

Washington, approximately 4.93 miles of rail line known as the Geiger

Spur. Western Rail will operate on an as needed basis from two to five

times per week, moving 200 to 500 freight cars a year. It interchanges

with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company.

Section 1 (a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of

the Surface Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle IV

of title 49, United States Code;

Sections 1 (a) and 1 (b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

(45 U.S.C. §§ 351 (a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition,

as does section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. §

3231).

BA#2667
-2-

The evidence of record establishes that Western Rail is a carrier

operating in interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that

Western Rail is an employer within the meaning of section 1 (a)(1 )(i) of 

the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(1 )(i)) and the

corresponding provision of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act

as of October 11,2004, the date as of which it commenced

operations.
<PAGE> 1



                                                                  Exhibit 99.3

               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William A. Loving, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.

                                          /s/ WILLIAM A. LOVING. JR.
                                          ------------------------
                                          William A. Loving, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                          August 12, 2003
                                          ---------------
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JONATHAN HUTCHINSON

, )

)

Petitioner

, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D 17

- 1310

)

HERBERT ANDERSON

, )

)

Respon dent

. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 6, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit

Court for Collier County ; Hugh Hayes

, Judge.

Mark Goldstein, Miami

, f or Petitioner

.

Jesse Gubernat, B anker Lopez Gassler,

Fort Myers; Dee Ann McLemore and

Charles Hall, Banker Lopez Gassler

, P.A.,

St. Petersburg ; and Stanley Plappert

, Ocala

, for Respondent

.

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash t he trial court's "Order

Granting Order to Show C ause. " See CB Condo s. , Inc. v. GRS S

. Fla

. , Inc. , 165 So. 3d

739, 742 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (reversing sanctions order that did not and could not find

the no n party deponent in contempt because the evidence did not establish that the- 2

- non party failed to be sworn o r to answer a question after being directed to do so by the

court); Mo rell v. Booth , 29 So. 3d 429 , 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (concluding that the trial

court erred by i mposing sanctions against a non party, absent a finding of contempt).

Petition granted; order quashed.

SILBERMAN

, SLEET, and LUCAS JJ., Concur.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2002

To establish a pilot program for the promotion of travel and tourism in 

the United States through United States international broadcasting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2003

Ms. BERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To establish a pilot program for the promotion of travel 

and tourism in the United States through United States 

international broadcasting.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM FOR THE PROMOTION OF 

4 TRAVEL AND TOURISM IN THE UNITED 

5 STATES THROUGH UNITED STATES INTER6 NATIONAL BROADCASTING. 

7 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Broadcasting Board of 

8 Governors, in consultation with the Department of Com-
2

•HR 2002 IH 

1 merce and other appropriate Federal, State, and local 

2 agencies, shall conduct a pilot program for the promotion 

3 of travel and tourism in the United States through United 

4 States international broadcasting, particularly to regional 

5 economies that have been affected by the decrease in tour6 ism following the events of September 11, 2001. 

7 (b) PROGRAMMING.—The pilot program shall devote 

8 regular programming to broadcasting information on lo9 calities of the United States with the purpose of promoting 

10 travel and tourism to regional economies heavily reliant 

11 on such tourism. 

12 (c) CONSULTATION.—The Broadcasting Board of 

13 Governors shall consult with Congress relating to actions 

14 taken by the Board in carrying out this section as well 

15 as options for improving programming efforts that would 

16 promote travel and tourism to the United States.

Æ
# L_2020068EN.01008701.xml

| 5.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/87

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 328/2019

of 13 December 2019

amending Annex XXII (Company Law) to the EEA Agreement [2020/346]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/237 of 8 February 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standard 28 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/237 of 8 February 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standard 28 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 10ba (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008) of Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32019 R 0237: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/237 of 8 February 2019 (OJ L 39, 11.2.2019, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32019 R 0237: Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/237 of 8 February 2019 (OJ L 39, 11.2.2019, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2019/237 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 December 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gunnar PÁLSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 39, 11.2.2019, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §240104. Membership

Eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1489.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 240104 | 36:3105. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–584, §5, 98 Stat. 3097. |

Section
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0094 - Tracking or Providing Enhanced Controls For Category 3 Sources

Accession Number: ML052200199

Date Released: Tuesday, May 9, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML060480105 - SECY-06-0094 - Tracking or Providing Enhanced Controls For Category 3 Sources (9 page(s), 4/24/2006)
    - ML060480138 - SECY-06-0094Enclosure 1 - Impacts of and Alternatives for Expanding the National Source Tracking System to Include Category 3 Sources (4 page(s), 4/24/2006)
    - ML060480163 - SECY-06-0094Enclosure 2 - An Analysis of Potential Regulatory Changes to the General Licenses (13 page(s), 4/24/2006)
    - ML060540454 - SECY-06-0094Enclosure 3 - Resource and Commitment Matrix Chart re:  Tracking or Providing Enhanced Controls for Other Than Category 1 and 2 Sources (3 page(s), 4/24/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Exhibit 32.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Zkid Network Company, (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the period ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition  and results of operation of the  Company.  A signed  original of this
written  statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to the  registrant
and  will  be  retained  by it and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated April 19, 2004.                                   /s/ Jon Darmstadter
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       Jon Darmstadter
## NO. 12

- 17

- 00205

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

GABRIELLA ROBERTS,
APPELLANT

V.

MISTI MONTALVO, INDI VIDUALLY
AND AS SUBSTITUTE TR USTEE AND AS FIDUCIARY,
APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 159T H

JUDIC IAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEX AS

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM

Gabriella Roberts sued Misti Montalvo, individually and as substitute trustee and

fiduciary, for wrongful foreclosure and breach of fiduciary duty. CitiMortgage, Inc. intervened.

CitiMortgage subsequently filed traditional and no

- evidence motions for summary judgment,

joined by Montalvo, and the trial court granted the motion s . Roberts filed a notice of appeal.

On August 8, 2017, this Court notified Roberts that h er notice of a ppeal failed to contain

the information specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.5 (service of documents), 25.1(e) (service of notice of appeal in civil cases) . The

notice warned that, unless Roberts f iled a proper notice of appeal on or before September 7 , the

appeal would be referred to the Court for dismissal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. The deadline has

passed and Roberts has not filed a compliant notice of appeal or otherwise responded to this

Court ’s August 8 notice.

Because Roberts has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 9.5 and 25.1 of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure , the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c)

. Opinion delivered September 20, 2017. Panel consisted of Worthe n, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J. ( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 20 , 2017

NO. 12

- 17

- 00205

- CV

GABRIELLA ROBERTS, Appellant
V. MISTI MONTALVO, INDI VIDUA LLY AND AS SUBSTITUT E TRUSTEE AND AS FIDUCIARY, Appellee

Appeal from the 159th District Court

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV

- 03191

- 14

- 05)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of th is Court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed ; and that this decision be certified to the court

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
NRC OPENS HELP DESK TO ASSIST PUBLIC WITH 

ELECTRONIC FILINGS IN LICENSING PROCEEDINGS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has established a telephone and e-mail help desk to 

assist members of the public and licensees in submitting or accessing documents through the 

agency’s electronic filing system. 

 The help desk, activated Nov. 10, will help stakeholders seeking information on license 

applications, including new nuclear power plants and the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository. 

Help will also be available for using the NRC’s Electronic Hearing Docket for adjudications before 

the Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; the Electronic Information Exchange for 

electronic submittal of documents; including e-filings for agency adjudications, and the agency’s 

ADAMS public online document management system. 

 Until now, public requests for assistance have been handled by the NRC Public Document 

Room staff. However, with electronic submissions in a wide variety of licensing proceedings 

expected to increase dramatically, the agency decided to create a dedicated help desk to handle 

requests for assistance. 

 “The help desk will improve our customer service by providing members of the public and 

our licensees with consistent and timely assistance in filing documents for adjudicatory hearings, 

license applications, and other matters,” said Darren B. Ash, the NRC’s deputy executive director 

for corporate management and chief information officer. “This furthers our goal of being open and 

transparent and encouraging maximum public participation in our regulatory activities.” 

 The NRC help desk will be open Mondays through Fridays, except federal holidays, from 8 

a.m. to 8 p.m. Eastern time. The help desk can be reached by toll-free telephone at 1-866-672-7640, 

or by e-mail at MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov. 

 More information on the help desk and instructions for electronic submissions to the NRC 

can be found in the newly revised “Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC, Revision 4,” 

on the agency Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-205 November 10, 2008