alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §154105. Powers

The corporation may—

(1) adopt and amend a constitution and bylaws for the management of its property and the regulation of its affairs;

(2) adopt and alter a corporate seal;

(3) choose officers, managers, employees, and agents as the activities of the corporation require;

(4) make contracts;

(5) acquire, own, lease, encumber, and transfer property as necessary or convenient to carry out the purposes of the corporation;

(6) borrow money, issue instruments of indebtedness, and secure its obligations by granting security interests in its property; and

(7) sue and be sued.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1432.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154105 | 36:1044(2)–(9). | Sept. 10, 1962, Pub. L. 87–655, §§3, 4(2)–(9), 17, 76 Stat. 531, 534. |
| | 36:1043.36:1057. | |

Section

36:1057.

In this section, the text of 36:1043 and 1057 is omitted as executed and obsolete.

In clause (1), the word "alter" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "not inconsistent with the laws of the United States or any State in which the corporation is to operate" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (2), the word "use" is omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (4), the words "make contracts" are substituted for "contract and be contracted with" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.

Clause (5) is substituted for "to take by lease, gift, purchase, grant, devise, or bequest from any private corporation, association, partnership, firm or individual and to hold any property, real, personal or mixed, necessary or convenient for attaining the objects and carrying into effect the purposes of the corporation" and "transfer, convey, lease, sublease, encumber and otherwise alienate real, personal, or mixed property" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "subject, however, to applicable provisions of law of any State (A) governing the amount or kind of property which may be held by or (B) otherwise limiting or controlling the ownership of property by, a corporation operating in such State" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (6), the words "for the purposes of the corporation" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "issue instruments of indebtedness, and secure its obligations by granting security interests in its property" are substituted for "issue bonds therefor, and secure the same by mortgage, deed of trust, pledge or otherwise" for consistency in the revised title. The words "subject in every case to all applicable provisions of Federal and State laws" are omitted as unnecessary.

In clause (7), the words "complain and defend in any court of competent jurisdiction" are omitted as unnecessary.
_____________

No. 96-1293WA

_____________

Tenna M. Potter, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Arkansas.

Shirley S. Chater, *

Commissioner of the Social * [UNPUBLISHED]

Security Administration, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: January 27, 1997

 Filed: January 30, 1997

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Tenna M. Potter appeals the district court's judgment affirming the

Social Security Commissioner's decision to deny Potter's applications for

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Having

reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude substantial

evidence supports the Commissioner's decision that Potter is not disabled

for Social Security purposes. Because an opinion by this court would not

have precedential value, we affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate

judge's recommendation adopted by the district court without further

discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §306. Appeal

The patent owner involved in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter may appeal under the provisions of section 134, and may seek court review under the provisions of sections 141 to 144, with respect to any decision adverse to the patentability of any original or proposed amended or new claim of the patent.

(Added Pub. L. 96–517, §1, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3016; amended Pub. L. 112–29, §§6(h)(2)(A), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, 335.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "134" and after "144".

Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(A), substituted "144" for "145".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Pub. L. 112–29, §6(h)(2)(B), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 312, provided that: "The amendment made by this paragraph [amending this section] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011] and shall apply to any appeal of a reexamination before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or the Patent Trial and Appeal Board that is pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act."

Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

##### **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofBancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(a) the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this 6th day of March, 2006.

 

 

 
| /s/ Merrill W. Sherman                 |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Merrill  W. Sherman                    |   |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bancorp RhodeIsland, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

----
### §254. Certificate of correction of Patent and Trademark Office mistake

Whenever a mistake in a patent, incurred through the fault of the Patent and Trademark Office, is clearly disclosed by the records of the Office, the Director may issue a certificate of correction stating the fact and nature of such mistake, under seal, without charge, to be recorded in the records of patents. A printed copy thereof shall be attached to each printed copy of the patent, and such certificate shall be considered as part of the original patent. Every such patent, together with such certificate, shall have the same effect and operation in law on the trial of actions for causes thereafter arising as if the same had been originally issued in such corrected form. The Director may issue a corrected patent without charge in lieu of and with like effect as a certificate of correction.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 809; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–582; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §88 (Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 535, §1, 43 Stat. 1268).

The last sentence of the present section is omitted as obsolete. A sentence is added similar to a provision in the corresponding section in the trade-mark law, 15 U.S.C., 1946 ed., §1057(f), and provides that the Commissioner may issue a corrected patent instead of a certificate of correction.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113. See 1999 Amendment note below.

1999—Pub. L. 106–113, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, substituted "Director" for "Commissioner" in two places.

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in section catchline and text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
#### § 6.5 Assignment of excepted employees.

No person who is serving under an excepted appointment shall be assigned to the work of a position in the competitive service without prior approval of OPM.
### §152510. Service of process

The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1417.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152510 | 36:465(b). | Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 429, §5(b), 67 Stat. 571. |

Section

The word "have" is substituted for "maintain" for consistency in the revised title. The words "at all times" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "to receive" are substituted for "authorized to accept", and the words "is notice to or service on" are substituted for "shall be deemed notice or service upon", for consistency in the revised title.
# L_2017308EN.01003401.xml

| 23.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 127/2016

of 3 June 2016

amending Annex XVI (Procurement) to the EEA Agreement [2017/2145]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/7 of 5 January 2016 establishing the standard form for the European Single Procurement Document (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/7 of 5 January 2016 establishing the standard form for the European Single Procurement Document (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 2 (Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘2a. | 32016 R 0007: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/7 of 5 January 2016 establishing the standard form for the European Single Procurement Document (OJ L 3, 6.1.2016, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2a.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/7 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 June 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 97/2016 of 29 April 2016 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 3, 6.1.2016, p. 16.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 300, 16.11.2017, p. 49

2

---
### §210313. Annual report

The corporation shall submit an annual report to Congress on the activities of the corporation during the prior fiscal year. The report shall be submitted at the same time as the report of the audit required by section 10101 of this title. The report may not be printed as a public document.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1458.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 210313 | 36:3011. | Oct. 30, 1984, Pub. L. 98–565, §12, 98 Stat. 2922. |

Section

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of reporting provisions in this section, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 207 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §150911. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1397.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150911 | 36:4511. | July 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–376, §11, 78 Stat. 323. |

Section
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1629

To clarify that the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument does 

not include within its boundaries any privately owned property, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To clarify that the Upper Missouri River Breaks National 

Monument does not include within its boundaries any 

privately owned property, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY EXCLUDED 

4 FROM MONUMENT. 

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

6 ‘Upper Missouri River Breaks Boundary Clarification 

7 Act’. 

8 (b) PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY EXCLUDED FROM

9 MONUMENT.—
2

•HR 1629 IH 

1 (1) PROPERTY CLARIFICATION.—The Upper 

2 Missouri River Breaks National Monument, estab3 lished by Presidential proclamation 7398 on January 

4 17, 2001, shall not include within its boundaries any 

5 privately owned property. 

6 (2) MAP.—The Secretary shall keep a map of 

7 the Monument reflecting the boundary clarification 

8 in paragraph (1) on file and available for public in9 spection in the appropriate offices of the Director of 

10 the Bureau of Land Management, Department of 

11 the Interior.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Destination Maternity Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Edward M. Krell, Chief Executive Officer & President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL                
|Edward M. Krell                    
|Chief Executive Officer & President

February 9, 2011
#### § 839.623 If I decide to keep the FERS election in effect, may I change the effective date of the FERS election?

No, If you decide to keep FERS, the original FERS election will remain unchanged.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-020 April 27, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION

AT KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR PLANT FOLLOWING SHUTDOWN 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Kewaunee Nuclear

Power Plant following the shutdown of the facility late Wednesday (April 26) which involved

problems with several non-nuclear components. The plant, located at Kewaunee, Wis., is operated by

Dominion Generation Co.

The plant was shut down safely, and there was no hazard to plant workers or the general public.

Operators were preparing to shut the plant down to repair a leak in the cooling system piping

for one of the emergency diesel generators when the problems occurred.

During the gradual shutdown, a pump in the secondary cooling system stopped unexpectedly

while the plant was at about 35 percent power. The pump stoppage should have caused the main steam

turbine to shut down, which, in turn, would have led to an automatic reactor shutdown.

When the main steam turbine failed to shut down, plant operators manually shut down the

turbine and the reactor promptly. All reactor safety systems then functioned as designed.

The utility declared an Alert under its emergency plan because the turbine and reactor did not

shut down automatically and led to operator action for the manual shutdown. Had the operators not

taken manual action, other safety circuits would have subsequently triggered an automatic shutdown. 

An Alert is the second lowest of NRC’s four emergency classifications. The NRC initially

monitored the event from its headquarters Operations Center in Rockville, Md. The NRC senior

resident inspector was dispatched to the plant to directly monitor plant activities, and the agency

staffed its incident response center at its Lisle, Ill., regional office.

The NRC inspectors will review the equipment problems associated with the shutdown and the

actions taken by plant operators to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe condition. The

agency will also monitor the repairs being made to the piping for the emergency diesel generator

cooling system.

The NRC special inspection team will issue its report about 30 days after the completion of the

inspection. The report will be available from the Region III Office of Public Affairs or in the agency’s
online document library at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html . (Use Docket

Number 05000305).

###
### SUBCHAPTER XXVII—PAUL COVERDELL FORENSIC SCIENCES IMPROVEMENT GRANTS
#### Otto Young *v.*Charles H. McConnell.

*Filed at Ottawa May 19, 1884.*

1. Error wmi not aiavays *reverse—as to giving and refusing instructions.*The refusal of a proper instruction relating to a collateral issue, which, if given, would not probably have induced a different verdict, affords no ground of reversal, as such error works no prejudice.

2. This court will not reverse, in every case of conflict in the evidence, because of some slight error in giving or refusing an instruction. When the evidence clearly sustains the verdict, this court never reverses for error in instructions.

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Goudy & Chandler, for the appellant.

Mr. A. B. Jenks, and Mr. A. S. Trude, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We regard it as unnecessary to consider more than one assignment of error in this case, and that is, whether the court below should have given defendant’s seventh instruction. It is this:

> “If the jury believe, from the evidence, that either the witness McConnell or the witness Clapp has willfully testified falsely as to any material fact, then they may disregard his evidence entirely, except when it is corroborated by other testimony. ”

It is urged that it is correct, and it was error to refuse it. It related to a collateral and not to the main issue in the *84case. The question then arises, whether its refusal was calculated to have injured appellant. If it is not apparent that the jury, had the instruction been given, would have reached a different verdict, or we can see they probably would have done so, we are unable to say the error prejudiced appellant. On examining the evidence, we are unable to believe that the result would have been different had it been given. All persons know, without being instructed, that a person who testifies falsely to a material fact in a case is unworthy of belief. The jury would know that any portion of the evidence which was corroborated should have been considered. The Appellate Court has found the fp,cts, and if they are true as found, (and we must so receive them,) the jury have reached a correct conclusion, independent of the instruction. Had the Appellate Court believed there was doubt as to the facts, or that the witnesses named had not made false statements, the judgment would no doubt have been reversed. We can not consider the weight of the evidence. That is for the jury and the Appellate Court. We are not prepared to adopt a rule that we will reverse in every case of conflict in the evidence because of some slight error in giving or refusing an instruction. When the evidence clearly sustains a verdict, this court never reverses because of error in instructions, and the Appellate Court is doubtless governed by the same rule, as it is required by the law. We can not say that court did not so act in this case.

The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
### **CHAPTER 503—DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS**

Sec.
50301.
Organization.
50302.
Purposes.
50303.
Membership.
50304.
Powers.
50305.
Exclusive right to name.
50306.
Restrictions.
50307.
Service of process.
50308.
Annual report.
50309.
Dissolution.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–135, §1(c), Mar. 18, 2016, 130 Stat. 300, added item 50309.