alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John Robertson, Chief Financial Officer* of Teryl Resources
Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources Corp. for
the year ended May 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, BC Canada     
|------------------------
|by: /s/ John Robertson  
|August 3, 2007          
|John Robertson          
|Chief Financial Officer*
|(*as of May 31, 2004)   



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained by Teryl
Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
### §2330b. Fish hatcheries

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may operate a fish hatchery for the purpose of restoring a population of fish species located in the region surrounding the fish hatchery that is listed as a threatened species or an endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) or a similar State law.

#### (b) Costs

A non-Federal entity, another Federal agency, or a group of non-Federal entities or other Federal agencies shall be responsible for 100 percent of the additional costs associated with managing a fish hatchery for the purpose described in subsection (a) that are not authorized as of December 16, 2016, for the fish hatchery.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1168, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1671.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Endangered Species Act of 1973, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 93–205, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 884, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1531 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1531 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 114–322, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
# L_2016341EN.01007401.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/74

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 173/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2016/2208]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include cooperation concerning free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include cooperation concerning free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for that extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2015, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for that extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In paragraphs 5 and 13 of Article 5 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, the words ‘the financial year 2014’ are replaced by the words ‘the financial years 2014 and 2015’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2015.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
| Searched for **http://www.cnet.com** | **153** Results |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------|
Certificate of Amendment                                                      Certificat de modification
  ADIRA ENERGY LTD.
  449907-7
    Canada Business Loi canadienne sur les
 Corporations Act societes par actions
  Canada
   -









Industry Industrie Canada Canada Form 4 Articles of AmendmentCanada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) (s. 27 or 177) Formulaire 4 Clauses modificatricesLoi canadienne sur ies societes par actions (LCSA) (art. 27 ou 177) Corporate name
 ADIRA ENERGY LTD.
 449907-7
      By consolidating the issued and outstanding common shares on the basis of 1 common share for every 3 common shares held.
 Alan Friedman




not or to
 t*t o m n
 Privacy Act
 catn et LoisvrUt rtrattgntmtna perron neb
Issue Date: 10/19/06 06-028 -1-

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 06-028

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 0801 03/13/06 IMC 0801 10/19/06

2. ------------ ------------ IMC 2696 10/19/06

3. IP 71007 03/13/06 IP 71007 10/19/06

TRAINING: None

REMARKS: IMC 0801 (Reactor Oversight Process Feedback Program) has been

revised to introduce the use of the NRR Work Planning Center to assign

TAC numbers and assign tasks to reviewer, using the Work Planning and

Characterization Form.

IMC 2696 (Louisiana Energy Services Gas Centrifuge Facility

Construction and Pre-Operational Readiness Review Inspection

Programs) has been issued to implement the construction and operational

readiness review inspection program at the Louisiana Energy Services

National Enrichment Facility 

IP 71007 (Reactor Vessel Head Replacement Inspection) has been

revised to changed Section 03.02.a.2.(a.) from an energy requirement of

75 ft-lbs for the reactor vessel head to be in agreement with ASME

Section III, Division 1, Subsection NB-2331 requirements of at least 35

mils lateral expansion and not less than 50 ft-lbs absorbed energy.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
#### M. J. Cletcher, Appellant, v. Estate of James L. Alsup, Deceased, Appellee.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Pope county; the Hon. William N. Butleb, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 1, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by M. J. Cletcher against the estate of James L. Alsup to recover on a promissory note. The trial court found in favor of the Estate and rendered judgment against plaintiff for costs. To reverse the judgment, plaintiff appeals; z

J. W. Browning and Charles Durfee, for appellant ; W. A. Spann, of counsel.

James C. Courtney and H. A. Evans, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice McBride

delivered the opinion of the court.

*475Abstract of the Decision.

Bills and notes, § *78*
      ***
      *—when erasures and alterations on note defeats recovery thereon.*In an action against an estate to recover on a promissory note containing erasures and alterations which plaintiff claimed were made before the note was signed by the deceased, *held*that a judgment for defendant was sustained by the evidence, it appearing that the amount of the note, the payee and also the date had been changed and there was no explanation given as to why a new note was not prepared.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ Nos. 97-1208/2077

___________ Jeffrey Barge, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * * Knight Ridder Corp.; Seattle Times * Appeals from the United States Co., T.A.; Blethen Corp.; BRJG * District Court for the Publishing, Inc.; Minnesota Law * District of Minnesota. and Politics, T/A; West Publishing * [UNPUBLISHED] Company; Mead Data Central, Inc.; * Reed Elsevier, PLC; Brett Johnson; * William White; Michele Matassa * Flores; John Doe, 1-100, * * Defendants - Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: April 15, 1998 Filed: April 24, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.TheHonorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Mi nnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John M

. Mason, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Jeffrey B arge appeals the district court & s orders dismissing his diversity suit

. 1 After reviewing the parti es’ submissions and following our de novo review, we affirm the ju dgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Barge’s motion for sanctions. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Open File Report 98-786

The exact equivalent of the U.S.G.S. Open-File Report for this quadrangle can be viewed and printed 

clicking on the following highlighted text:

Saint Lawrence pdf file (244 k)

(Note that the ARDF is in Adobe Acrobat format; if your computer does not hav

this software, it can be installed with the Acrobat icon at the bottom of this page

Digital Versions of the Data

The data was originally compiled with FileMaker Pro software; if you have Version 7.0 or later of FileM

your computer, the data can be searched and manipulated through your browser by clicking on 

Saint Lawrence FileMaker Pro (.fp7) file (328 k)

(If you are going to use this file repeatedly, it may be more convenient to downlo

it permanently to your computer rather than wait for it to download through yo

browser every time you wish to use it.)

ARDF - Saint Lawrence http://ard1 of 2 
The data can also be downloaded in a "csv" format that can be used with a variety of data base and sprea

have the appropriate software that can work with csv files installed on your computer, the data can be m

directly through your browser. (However, see the comment in italics above for the advantages of down

your computer if it is to be used repeatedly).

Saint Lawrence comma-separated-value (.csv) file (71 k)

ARDF Home | Quad Map | Quad Table | 

<URL:http://ardf.wr.usgs.gov/quads/html/SaintLawrence.html >

Page maintainer: ARDF@usgs.gov

ARDF - Saint Lawrence http://ard2 of 2
#### § 723.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge 

Jeffrey Darrisaw 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2
§ 831.673 Rates of child annuities. ( a ) ( 1 ) The rate of annuity payable to a child survivor whose annuity commenced before February 27, 1986, is computed in accordance with the law in effect on the date when the annuity began to accrue, unless the rate of annuity is recomputed under paragraph (e) of this section on or after February 27, 1986.
( 2 ) The rate of annuity payable to a child survivor whose annuity commenced on or after February 27, 1986, or was recomputed under paragraph (e) of this section on or after February 27, 1986, is computed under paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the rate of annuity of a child survivor is computed under section 8341(e)(2) (i) through (iii) of title 5, United States Code, with adjustments in accordance with section 8340 of title 5, United States Code, when the deceased employee, Member or annuitant was never married to a natural or adoptive parent of that surviving child of the former employee or Member.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the rate of annuity payable to a child survivor is computed under section 8341(e)(2) (A) through (C) of title 5, United States Code, with adjustments in accordance with section 8340 of title 5, United States Code, whenever a deceased employee, Member, or retiree is survived by a natural or adoptive parent of that surviving child of the employee, Member, or retiree.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the rate of annuity payable to a child survivor is computed under section 8341(e)(2) (i) through (iii) of title 5, United States Code, with adjustments in accordance with section 8340 of title 5, United States Code, when the deceased employee, Member, or retiree is not survived by a natural or adoptive parent of that surviving child of the former employee or Member.
( e ) On the death of a natural or adoptive parent or termination of the annuity of a child, the annuity of any other child or children is recomputed and paid as though the parent or child had not survived the former employee or Member.
[51 FR 31933, Sept. 8, 1986. Redesignated at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
AD Grid Sheet 

Docket No.: FAA-2012-0189 

Directorate Identifier: 2011 -NM-133-AD 

AD Action: Final rule after NPRM 

This action applies to BAE SYSTEMS (OPERATIONS) LIMITED Model BAe 146 and 

Avro 146-RJ airplanes 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial and 

full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

~CURRENCES 

ROUTING SYMUOL 

/t).)){- f IN ITI ~IG 

~ 

[)ATF5:/ ·:, I 

1'2--

ROUTING SY~WOL 

A-;V;« .- / D I 

INITIALSISIG 

[)ATE 

INII IALSISIG 

DATE 

ROUTING S\'MDOL 

INITIALSISIG 

DATE
Case 0:20-cv-61469-RS Document 207-203 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/05/2023 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Vanessa Avila, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.

Dated: September 10, 2007

/s/ Vanessa AvilaVanessa Avila
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program (5587).                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lyle Furr, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 4227, MSC 9550, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-9550, (301) 827-5702,                         *lf33c.nih.gov.*

 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No.: 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 19, 2018.

Natasha M. Copeland,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-28013 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67325-67326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28231]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0973]

Random Drug Testing Rate for Covered Crewmembers for 2019

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of minimum random drug testing rate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has set the calendar year 2019 minimum random 
drug testing rate at 50 percent of covered crewmembers.

DATES: The minimum random drug testing rate is effective January 1, 
2019 through December 31, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this notice, 
please contact Mr. Patrick Mannion, Drug and Alcohol Prevention and 
Investigation Program Manager, Office of Investigations and Casualty 
Analysis (CG-INV), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard requires marine employers to 
establish random drug testing programs for covered crewmembers in 
accordance with 46 CFR 16.230. Every marine employer is required by 46 
CFR 16.500 to collect and maintain a record of drug testing data for 
each calendar year, and submit this data by 15 March of the following 
year to the Coast Guard in an annual MIS report.
    Each year, the Coast Guard will publish a notice reporting the 
results of random drug testing for the previous calendar year's MIS 
data and the minimum annual percentage rate for random drug testing for 
the next calendar year. The purpose of setting a minimum random drug 
testing rate is to promote maritime safety by establishing an effective 
deterrent to drug misuse within the maritime workforce. Intoxicated 
operations poses a serious threat to life, property and the environment 
in the maritime commons. As such, the minimum random drug testing rate 
is intended to deter and detect illegal drug misuse in the maritime 
industry.
    The Coast Guard announces that the minimum random drug testing rate 
for calendar year 2019 is 50 percent. The Coast Guard has increased the 
minimum random drug testing rate for 2019 as a result of MIS data for 
the most recent reporting year indicating that the positive rate is 
greater than one percent. 46 CFR part 16.230(f)(2) requires the 
Commandant to set the minimum random drug testing rate at 50 percent 
when the positivity rate for drug use is greater than 1 percent.
    For 2019, the minimum random drug testing rate will be 50 percent 
of covered employees for the period of January 1,

[[Page 67326]]

2019 through December 31, 2019 in accordance with 46 CFR 16.230(e).

    Dated: December 19, 2018.
Jennifer F. Williams,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Director of Inspections and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018-28231 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**






STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Diagnostic Corp. of
      America (the "Company") for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Wang, Li Hua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Wang, Li Hua


Wang,
      Li
      Hua


Chief
      Financial Officer








November
      11, 2006







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.