alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-249]



[[Page 922]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 20, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Marantz Group, LP, Springfield, Illinois and its general 
partner, Tom E. Marantz, Springfield, Illinois; to retain voting shares 
of Staun Bancorp, Inc., Staunton, Illinois, and thereby indirectly 
retain voting shares of First Community State Bank, Staunton, Illinois.
    2. Joseph Thomas McLane, Poplar Bluff, Missouri; to become a 
trustee of Midwest Bancorporation Inc. and Affiliates Employee Stock 
Ownership Plan, Poplar Bluff, Missouri, and thereby indirectly gain 
control of Midwest Bancorporation, Inc., Poplar Bluff, Missouri, First 
Midwest Bank of Carter County, Van Buren, Missouri, First Midwest Bank 
of Dexter, Dexter, Missouri, and First Midwest Bank of Piedmont, 
Piedmont, Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 31, 
2003.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-249 Filed 1-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
§ 831.112 Definitions of employee. ( a ) *Determinations involving an employee's ability to make a deposit or redeposit.* A person may make a deposit or redeposit under section 8334 of title 5, United States Code, if he or she is an “employee.” For purposes of this paragraph, an *employee* is— ( 1 ) A person currently employed in a position subject to the civil service retirement law; or
( 2 ) A former employee (whose annuity has not been finally adjudicated) who retains civil service retirement annuity rights based on a separation from a position in which retirement deductions were properly withheld and remain (or have been redeposited in whole or in part) in the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund.
( b ) *Determinations involving the payment of survivor benefits at an employee's or former employee's death.* To determine entitlement to survivor benefits, OPM establishes whether the deceased individual was an “employee” or a “retiree” on the date of death. If the decedent was an “employee” on the date of death, survivor benefits are paid as though the individual died in service. If the decedent was a “retiree” on the date of death, survivor benefits are only paid as provided in the individual's election, provided it was properly made. However, if a former employee was eligible only for a deferred annuity at age 62, survivor benefits are only paid if the individual was a “retiree” on the date of death. For purposes of this paragraph— ( 1 ) *Employee* is a person— ( i ) Who had not been separated from service prior to his or her death, even if he or she had applied for retirement (for example, an applicant for disability annuity) and the application had been approved; or
( ii ) Whose death occurs before the commencing date of annuity, even though separation has occurred.
( 2 ) Retiree or annuitant is a person— ( i ) Who has been separated from service and met all the requirements to receive an annuity including having filed an application for the annuity prior to his or her death; and
( ii ) Whose death occurs on or after the commencing date of annuity.
( c ) *Determinations involving the requirement of spousal consent for elections of alternative annuity and survivor annuity benefits.* Spousal consent is required as specified in §§ 831.614 and 831.2203(c), if the employee/annuitant is married on the commencing date of annuity, regardless of whether that date is before or after the date of separation from service.
[56 FR 45883, Sept. 9, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 52880, Oct. 13, 1993]
§ 831.601 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart explains the annuity benefits payable in the event of the death of employees, retirees, and Members; the actions that employees, retirees, Members, and their current spouses, former spouses, and eligible children must take to qualify for survivor annuities; and the types of evidence required to demonstrate entitlement to provide survivor annuities or qualify for survivor annuities.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified, this subpart, except §§ 831.682 and 831.683 and the provisions relating to children's survivor annuities, only applies to employees and Members who retire under a provision of law that permits election of a reduced annuity to provide a survivor annuity.
[55 FR 9099, Mar. 12, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 52880, Oct. 13, 1993]
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the quarterly report of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date:
November 14, 2008




/s/
      G. Wade StubblefieldG.
      Wade StubblefieldChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)






Date:
November 14, 2008




/s/
      William WisemanWilliam
      WisemanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer,(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0177 - Proposed Rule: Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72:  RIN: 3150-AH45)

Accession Number: ML070140014

Date Released: Monday, October 22, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML072390153 - SECY-07-0177 - Proposed Rule: Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72:  RIN: 3150-AH45) (11 page(s), 10/3/2007)
    - ML072480620 - SECY-07-0177 - Enclosure 1:  Existing Regulations That Staff Could Use to Identify Subsurface Contamination. (1 page(s), 9/5/2007)
    - ML072480623 - SECY-07-0177 - Enclosure 2:  List of Proposed Amendments and Revised Section of Regulatory Text. (1 page(s), 9/5/2007)
    - ML072480629 - SECY-07-0177 - Enclosure 3:  Proposed Amendments for Tighter Controls on Decommissioning Financial Assurance. (13 page(s), 9/5/2007)
    - ML072390177 - SECY-07-0177 - Enclosure 4:  Federal Register Notice for Proposed Rule re:  Proposed Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (129 page(s), 10/3/2007)
    - ML072390191 - SECY-07-0177 - Enclosure 5:  Regulatory Analysis re:  Proposed Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (65 page(s), 1/9/2007)
    - ML072390205 - SECY-07-0177 - Enclosure 6:  Environmental Assessment re:  Proposed Rule:  Decommissioning Planning (10 CFR Parts 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, and 72; RIN 3150-AH45) (6 page(s), 1/9/2007)
    - ML072700917 - SECY-07-0177 Enclosure 7:  Referenced SECY and SRM Documents re:  Proposed Rule for Decommissioning Planning (1 page(s), 10/3/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
B.C.D. 00-18

Employer Status Determination MAY 1 7 2000

New Orleans Lower Coast Railroad, Inc.

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of the New Orleans Lower Coast Railroad, Inc. (NOLR) (B.A.

No. 3881) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et.

seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et. 

seq.) (RULA). NOLR was determined to be an employer covered under the RRA

and RULA effective March 16, 1991.

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket No. 33736, decided

April 20, 1999, the New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company (NOGC)1 filed a

notice of exemption to acquire from NOLR its entire rail line. The transaction

was scheduled to be consummated on or after April 15, 1999.

NOLR advised the Board that it ceased operations and its employees last

performed compensated service on April 23, 1999. NOLR further advised that

NOGC purchased NOLR’s assets at that time and that NOLR’s employees

thereafter either stayed on with NOGC, transferred to another company within

Railtex, or resigned. According to NOLR, its only remaining relationship with

the railroad industry involves the payment of past due bills.

In view of the foregoing, it is the determination of the Railroad Retirement

Board that the New Orleans Lower Coast Railroad, Inc. ceased to be an

employer covered under the RRA and RULA as ofthe close of business on

April 23, 1999, the date on which it ceased operations and last compensated its

employees.

‘NOGC was determined to be an employer under the Acts administered

by the Board effective April 24,1999. See B.C.D. 99-24.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

BA# 3881
#### § 2425.1 Applicability of this part.

This part applies to all arbitration cases in which exceptions are filed with the Authority, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7122, on or after June 4, 2012.

[77 FR 26434, May 4, 2012]
§ 7.3 Citizenship. ( a ) No person shall be admitted to competitive examination unless such person is a citizen or national of the United States.
( b ) No person shall be given any appointment in the competitive service unless such person is a citizen or national of the United States.
( c ) OPM may, as an exception to this rule and to the extent permitted by law, authorize the appointment of aliens to positions in the competitive service when necessary to promote the efficiency of the service in specific cases or for temporary appointments.
[E.O. 11935, 41 FR 37301, Sept. 3, 1976. Redesignated by E.O. 13197, 66 FR 7853, Jan. 25, 2001]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vanessa
Avila, the President, Secretary and Director (Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
April 14, 2009





Vanessa
Avila





/s/Vanessa
Avila


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanmi Financial
Corporation; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 Date:            June 3, 2010
    /s/ Brian E. ChoBrian E. ChoExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Application of Anthony V. Seghy for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Ohio.)

Application granted. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
### §30109. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1316.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30109 | 36:893. | Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–870, §13, 72 Stat. 1694. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
EXHIBIT G

Case 1:20-cv-23449-BB Document 61-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2021 Page 1 of 4
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-cv-23449-BLOOM/Louis

JULIE FERRO, 

 Plaintiff,

 v. 

DOCTORS HEALTHCARE PLANS, 

INC., 

 Defendant.

______________________________/

[PROPOSED] VERDICT FORM

Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence:

1. That Ms. Ferro had a “disability”?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your 

foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your 

answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.

2. That Ms. Ferro was a “qualified individual”?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your 

foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your 

answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.

Case 1:20-cv-23449-BB Document 61-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2021 Page 2 of 4
2

3. That Doctors HealthCare Plans terminated Ms. Ferro’s employment

because of her disability?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “No,” this ends your deliberations, and your 

foreperson should sign and date the last page of this verdict form. If your 

answer is “Yes,” go to the next question.

4. That Ms. Ferro should be awarded damages to compensate for a net 

loss of wages and benefits to the date of your verdict?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “Yes,”

in what amount? $_____________

5. That Ms. Ferro should be awarded damages to compensate for 

emotional pain and mental anguish?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “Yes,”

in what amount? $_____________

If you did not award damages in response to either Question Nos. 4 or 

5, this ends your deliberations, and your foreperson should sign and date the 

last page of this verdict form. If you awarded damages in response to 

Question Nos. 4 or 5 (or both), go to the next question.

Case 1:20-cv-23449-BB Document 61-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2021 Page 3 of 4
3

6. Do you find from clear and convincing evidence that punitive 

damages should be assessed against Doctors HealthCare Plans?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “Yes,”

in what amount? $_____________]

7. Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that punitive 

damages should be assessed against Doctors HealthCare Plans?

Answer Yes or No _____________

If your answer is “Yes,”

in what amount? $_____________]

SO SAY WE ALL.

___________________________

Foreperson’s Signature

DATE: ___________________

Case 1:20-cv-23449-BB Document 61-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/24/2021 Page 4 of 4
APPENDIX B 

BART DETERMINATION SUPPORT DOCUMENTS 

BART DETERMINATION SUPPORT DOCUMENTS 

Fourteen units at seven facilities in Nevada were identified as eligible for Best Available Retrofit 

Technology (BART) determinations. The BART-eligible facilities include: NV Energy’s 

generating stations at Tracy, Fort Churchill, Reid Gardner and Sunrise; Southern California 

Edison’s (SCE) generating station at Mohave; Nevada Cement Company’s facility at Fernley;

and Chemical Lime Company’s facility at Apex. 

A summary of the Western Regional Air Partnership’s BART exemption modeling results for 

Nevada’s BART-eligible sources is found at http://ndep.nv.gov/baqp/planmodeling/rhaze.html. 

Nevada Cement Company chose to do their own modeling and assessment to determine whether 

they were subject to BART. Their report and protocol may be viewed at “Source-Specific BART 

Exemption Modeling Report: Nevada Cement Company - Fernley Plant,”

(http://ndep.nv.gov/baqp/planmodeling/rhaze.html) and “Source-Specific BART Modeling 

Protocol: Nevada Cement Company - Fernley Plant” 

(http://ndep.nv.gov/baqp/planmodeling/rhaze.html), respectively. Three BART-eligible sources 

in Nevada were exempt from BART determinations: NV Energy’s Sunrise Generating Station, 

Chemical Lime Company and Nevada Cement Company. 

Four facilities in Nevada, comprising ten units, are subject to BART: NV Energy’s generating 

stations at Tracy (units 1, 2 and 3), Fort Churchill (units 1 and 2) and Reid Gardner (units 1, 2 

and 3); and SCE’s generating station at Mohave (units 1 and 2). Because the Nevada Division of 

Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Planning (NDEP-BAQP) did not accept NV 

Energy’s BART determination for NOx at Tracy, Fort Churchill and Reid Gardner or their SO2

BART determination at Reid Gardner, NDEP-BAQP prepared a BART determination review 

document for each of the NV Energy facilities. SCE’s BART determination for Mohave was 

accepted by NDEP-BAQP, and therefore, an agency review/determination document was not 

prepared for Mohave. 

Support documents for Nevada’s BART determinations are found at 

http://ndep.nv.gov/baqp/planmodeling/rhaze.html. This includes: 

NDEP BART Determination Reviews of NV Energy BART Analyses:

• Fort Churchill BART Review (revised October 2009) 

• Tracy BART Review (revised October 2009) 

• Reid Gardner BART Review (revised April and October 2009) 

NV Energy 10-03-2008 BART Reports and Appendices:

• BART Analysis for Fort Churchill Unit 1 and appendix 

• BART Analysis for Fort Churchill Unit 2 and appendix 

• BART Analysis for Tracy Unit 1 and appendix 

• BART Analysis for Tracy Unit 2 and appendix 

• BART Analysis for Tracy Unit 3 and appendix 

B - 1 
• BART Analysis for Reid Gardner Station Unit 1 and appendix 

• BART Analysis for Reid Gardner Station Unit 2 and appendix 

• BART Analysis for Reid Gardner Station Unit 3 and appendix 

BART Determination for SEC’s Mohave Generating Station and appendices, October 9, 

2008:

• Mohave BART Report 

• Appendices 

B - 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alexander International Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Tsuida, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of this
date.


/s/ Robert Tsuida                                                 11/26/04
----------------------------                                      --------
Robert Tsuida                                                       Date
Chief Financial Officer
### §154109. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1433.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154109 | 36:1053. | Sept. 10, 1962, Pub. L. 87–655, §13, 76 Stat. 533. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.