alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

          - [Request for Application 05017] 

                    A notice announcing the availability of fiscal year (FY) 2005 funds for a research cooperative agreement program to conduct efficacy and effectiveness trials of intervention strategies to prevent intimate partner violence and/or its negative consequences, particularly studies of strategies that have not been well studied, for at-risk or underserved populations was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 207, pages 62694-62701. The notice is amended as follows: On page 62696, Column 3, Line 2, delete $1,800,000 and replace with the new amount of $2,250,000.                 

Dated: November 3, 2004. 

William Nichols, 

Acting Director, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 04-25027 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### § 838.241 Cost-of-living adjustments.

Unless otherwise provided in the court order, when the terms of the court order or § 838.621 provide for cost-of-living adjustments on the former spouse's payment from employee annuity, the cost-of-living adjustment will be effected at the same time and at the same percentage rate as the cost-of-living adjustment in the employee annuity.
No. IV-08-035 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 August 21, 2008 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC PROPOSES $20,800 FINE AGAINST ALASKA INDUSTRIAL X-RAY, INC., 

ISSUES ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a fine of $20,800 against Alaska 

Industrial X-Ray, Inc. of Anchorage, Alaska, for violating NRC requirements. In addition, NRC 

has issued an order modifying the terms and conditions of the company’s license and barred two 

individuals from participating in NRC licensed activities. 

 In a letter to the company, NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said that as a 

result of an NRC inspection and investigation, the agency determined that the company violated 

requirements for the possession and use of radioactive materials. 

 The violations occurred when two of the company’s radiographers, a part-time 

radiographer and radiation safety officer deliberately conducted radiographic operations at a 

temporary jobsite without the presence of two qualified individuals on multiple occasions since 

2004. In addition, company officials, including the president, provided misleading information 

to NRC investigators when questioned about the incidents. 

 “The circumstances in this case raise serious concerns about AIX company management’s 

ability or desire to conduct licensed activities safely.” Collins said. “This is why significant 

enforcement action is needed.” 

 Therefore, the NRC is issuing an Order modifying the company’s license to require (1) 

continued independent oversight designed to ensure that AIX radiographers follow NRC 

requirements; (2) that AIX hire an independent consultant to evaluate the company’s safety 

procedures and provide training to radiographers and their assistants; (3) that steps be taken to 

control access to an area where radiography is conducted; and (4) the president of AIX take 

radiation safety training and perform quarterly audits of company radiographers. 

In addition, the NRC has issued orders barring two individuals involved in the incidents 

from participating in NRC licensed activities for periods of one year and three years. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 
 The company has 30 days to pay the proposed fine or challenge it; 20 days to respond to 

the order or request a hearing; and 10 days to request alternative dispute resolution. The NRC’s 

letter, its enclosures, and the company’s responses will be available through the agency’s 

electronic reading room at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in assessing these 

documents is available from the NRC Public Document Room at: 1-800-397-4209. 

 ### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §152703. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to promote, in every way, patriotic, scientific, educational, and civic improvement activities and public safety in skiing, by such means as the dissemination of information and the formation of volunteer local patrols consisting of competent skiers trained in first aid for the purpose of preventing accidents and rendering speedy assistance to individuals sustaining accidents; and

(2) to solicit contributions of money, services, and other property for, and generally to encourage and assist in carrying out these purposes in every way.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1418.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152703 | 36:1503. | Dec. 2, 1980, Pub. L. 96–489, §3, 94 Stat. 2553. |

Section

In clause (1), the words "in every way" are substituted for "in any and all ways" for consistency in this section and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "by such means as" are substituted for "including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "with respect thereto" and "the administration of" are omitted as unnecessary.
Martin, Michael (OST) D o ^ G)5T- ;^C X^*^ - \ \ A 4^.(U 

From: Ridgway, William [WMR10@psu.edu] ;_ ,. T-pr M 

Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:15 AM . ; I> ;. ;'l \,ioU 

To: EAS(OST) 

Subject: Essential Air Service contract - Altoona-Blair County Airport 

Essential Air Service Division, 

As an employee of the Pennsylvania State University my colleagues and I take flights to and from both the University 

Park Airport and the Altoona-Blair County Airport. I have used Colgan Air on numerous occasions. 

Colgan Air, in my opinion does a great all around job providing a vital link to the Washington, DC airports. I've always 

found their flights to be reasonably on time with the only delays I've encountered to be due to circumstances beyond 

their control. The pilots operated at a high professional level, seemed well trained and never 'fatigued' as described in 

the article published in the Altoona Mirror ( 

http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/529003.html7nav-742 ). In addition the entire crew including 

the flight attendants are always considerate and attentive. 

I therefore support continued use of Colgan Air to fulfill the commuter flight service at the Altoona-Blair Airport. 

Sincerely, 

Penn State Employee
### §59q–1. Union Canal, Outer Buffalo Harbor, New York

The portion of the Union Canal, also known as the Union Ship Canal, an appendage of the Buffalo Outer Harbor, located in the City of Buffalo, State of New York, is declared to be a nonnavigable waterway of the United States within the meaning of the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525, et seq.) from a point two hundred feet west of Fuhrmann Boulevard east to its terminus.

(Pub. L. 100–202, §101(l) [title III, §332], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–358, 1329–384.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Bridge Act of 1946, referred to in text, is title V of act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, 60 Stat. 847, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§525 et seq.) of chapter 11 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 525 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                  CERTIFICATION
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of CFB Bancshares,
Inc., I, Wendell S. Langley,  Chief Financial  Officer of CFB Bancshares,  Inc.,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  CFB
     Bancshares, Inc.



Date:  May 14, 2003                         /s/ Wendell S. Langley
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Wendell S. Langley
                                            Chief Financial Officer
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of the Company for the nine months      ended September 30, 2009. |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         | NF Energy Saving      Corporation |                                              |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                              |                                              |   |
| Date:      November 11, 2009 | By:                               | /S/      Li Hua, Wang                             |   |
|                         |                              | (Principal Financial and      Accounting Officer) |   |

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Edward M. Krell, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mothers Work, Inc.;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| February 9, 2005 |                                                | ** ** | **  /s/ EDWARD M. KRELL** | ** ** | ** ** |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| Date                  | Edward M. Krell                                     | ** ** |
| * *              | *Executive Vice  President-Chief Financial Officer* | * *   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 52b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Review.
    Date: January 28, 2019.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, The Gateway Building, Suite 
2W-200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Greg Bissonette, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 
Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-402-1622, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7858e94948889829393828085a78a868e8bc9898e8fc9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4a6adb7b7abaaa1b0b0a1a3a684a9a5ada8eaaaadaceaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 19, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
 Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-28011 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §150413. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation shall be liable for the acts of the officers and agents of the corporation acting within the scope of their authority.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 938.)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-036 August 12, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION OF DAMAGE

TO NUCLEAR GAUGE AT INDIANA FOUNDRY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection to review the

circumstances surrounding the recent damage to a nuclear gauge at the DaimlerChrysler Indianapolis

Foundry. The foundry, located at 1100 S. Tibbs Ave., Indianapolis, Ind., manufactures cast iron engine

blocks.

The gauge was damaged when overheated during foundry operations in late July. The

permanently mounted gauge, which contains a sealed radiation source of radioactive cesium, is used to

measure the level of metal in foundry equipment. The overheating affected the lead shielding in the

gauge, but does not appear to have damaged the radioactive material which is contained in a doublewalled steel capsule inside the shielded gauge.

After the gauge was damaged, several workers may have received inadvertent radiation

exposures while assessing the malfunction. No significant health consequences would be expected

from these radiation exposures.

The damage was reported to the NRC on Wednesday, August 10. The gauge has been shut

down, and access to the area surrounding the gauge is being controlled.

A team of three NRC inspectors arrived at the facility on Thursday afternoon. The inspectors

are reviewing the gauge damage, evaluating the possible radiation exposures received by workers, and

assessing the plans for removal and replacement of the gauge.

An report of the team’s findings will be issued about 30 days after the completion of the

inspection. The report will be available from the NRC’s Region III Office of Public Affairs and in the

NRC’s online public document library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html – assistance in

using the document library is available from the NRC Public Document Room staff at 800/397-4209.

###
Section 1350 Certification

Exhibit 32.2

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2007

 

 

|   | By:    | /s/ Randall J. Opliger                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Randall J. Opliger

Chief Financial Officer |
### §21302. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to promote historical studies;

(2) to collect and preserve historical manuscripts; and

(3) other kindred purposes in the interest of American history and of history in America.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21302 | 36:20 (1st sentence words beginning with "for the promotion"). | Jan. 4, 1889, ch. 20, (1st sentence words beginning with "for the promotion"), 25 Stat. 640. |

Section
§ 731.203 Suitability actions by OPM and other agencies. ( a ) For purposes of this part, a suitability action is one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Cancellation of eligibility;
( 2 ) Removal;
( 3 ) Cancellation of reinstatement eligibility; and
( 4 ) Debarment.
( b ) A non-selection, or cancellation of eligibility for a specific position based on an objection to an eligible or pass over of a preference eligible under 5 CFR 332.406, is *not* a suitability action even if it is based on reasons set forth in § 731.202.
( c ) A suitability action may be taken against an applicant or an appointee when OPM or an agency exercising delegated authority under this part finds that the applicant or appointee is unsuitable for the reasons cited in § 731.202, subject to the agency limitations of § 731.103(g).
( d ) OPM may require that an appointee or an employee be removed on the basis of a material, intentional false statement, deception or fraud in examination or appointment; refusal to furnish testimony as required by § 5.4 of this chapter; or a statutory or regulatory bar which prevents the person's lawful employment.
( e ) OPM may cancel any reinstatement eligibility obtained as a result of a material, intentional false statement, deception or fraud in examination or appointment.
( f ) An action to remove an appointee or employee *for suitability reasons* under this part is not an action under part 315, 359, or 752 of this chapter. Where behavior covered by this part may also form the basis for an action under parts 315, 359, or 752 of this chapter, an agency may take the action under part 315, 359, or 752 of this chapter, as appropriate, instead of under this part. An agency must notify OPM to the extent required in § 731.103(g) if it wants to take, or has taken, action under these authorities.
( g ) Agencies do not need approval from OPM before taking unfavorable suitability actions. However, they are required to report to OPM all unfavorable suitability actions taken under this part within 30 days after they take the action. Also, all actions based on an OPM investigation must be reported to OPM as soon as possible and in no event later than 90 days after receipt of the final report of investigation.
§ 838.611 Identifying the retirement system. ( a ) To satisfy the requirements of § 838.303(b)(1) or § 838.502(b)(1), a court order must contain language identifying the retirement system to be affected. For example, “CSRS,” “FERS,” “OPM,” or “Federal Government” benefits, or benefits payable “based on service with the U.S. Department of Agriculture,” etc., are sufficient identification of the retirement system.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section, language referring to benefits under another retirement system, such as military retired pay, Foreign Service retirement benefits or Central Intelligence Agency retirement benefits, does not satisfy the requirements of § 838.303(b)(1) or § 838.502(b)(1). ( 1 ) A court order that mistakenly labels CSRS benefits as FERS benefits and vice versa satisfies the requirements of §§ 838.303(b)(1) and 838.502(b)(1).
( 2 ) Unless the court order expressly provides otherwise, for employees transferring to FERS, court orders directed at CSRS benefits apply to the entire FERS basic benefit, including the CSRS component, if any. Such a court order satisfies the requirements of §§ 838.303(b)(1) and 838.502(b)(1).
( c ) A court order affecting military retired pay, even when military retired pay has been waived for inclusion in CSRS annuities, does not award a former spouse a portion of an employee annuity or a refund of employee contributions under CSRS or FERS. Such a court order does not satisfy the requirements of § 838.303(b)(1) or § 838.502(b)(1).