alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 208.7 Report to the President. In its report to the President, the Commission will include the following: ( a ) The determination made and an explanation of the basis for the determination;
( b ) If the determination is affirmative or if the Commission is equally divided in its determination, the recommendation of members of the Commission who agreed to the affirmative determination for the action that is necessary to address the material harm or threat of material harm found, and an explanation of the basis for the recommendation.
( c ) Any dissenting or separate views by members of the Commission regarding the determination.
No. 07-093 July 30, 2007

NRC MEETING AUG. 14 IN SOLOMONS, MD TO DISCUSSREVIEW PROCESS FOR CALVERT CLIFFS REACTOR APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s staff will conduct a public meeting in Solomons, Md.,on Tuesday, Aug. 14, to discuss how the agency will review a Combined License application for a newreactor at the Calvert Cliffs site, located 40 miles south of Annapolis. The applicant, UniStar,submitted one part of its application for a license to build and operate an Evolutionary Power Reactorat Calvert Cliffs on July 13.

“It’s important to the NRC that we keep the public near Calvert Cliffs well-informed of ourreview and their opportunities to participate in the licensing process,” said William Borchardt, Directorof the NRC’s Office of New Reactors.

The meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn Select Solomons, 155 Holiday Drive, from7 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. NRC staff will describe the overall Combined License review process, whichincludes safety and environmental assessments, as well as how the public can participate in the process.The NRC will host an open house for two hours prior to the meeting so members of the public have theopportunity to talk informally with agency staff.

UniStar’s environmental report is available on the NRC Web site at this address:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col.html.  More information on the NRC’s new reactorlicensing process is available on the agency’s Web site here:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
NRC ACCEPTS APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTOR AT RIVER BEND SITE 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has docketed, or accepted for review, a combined 

license (COL) application from Entergy for a new reactor at the River Bend site in Louisiana. 

Entergy’s application, submitted Sept. 25, is the 14th COL request the agency has accepted for 

review. 

The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC 

Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/river-bend.html. Entergy seeks 

approval to build and operate an Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) at the 

site, about 24 miles northwest of Baton Rouge, La. 

The NRC currently is reviewing the ESBWR design for possible certification. The staff 

will consider any findings concerning the design during the review of the River Bend 

application. Information on the ESBWR application is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/design-cert/esbwr.html. 

Docketing the River Bend application does not indicate whether the Commission will 

issue a license. The docket number established for this application is 52-036. The NRC will 

shortly issue in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to participate, or “intervene,” in a 

hearing on the application. Petitions to intervene in a hearing may be filed within 60 days of the 

notice, by anyone whose interest may be affected by the proposed license and who wishes to 

participate as a party in the proceeding. More information on the hearing process is available on 

the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/adjudicatory/hearing.html. 

Information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-221 December 10, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated
this 10th day of March, 2008.

|/s/MERRILL W. SHERMANMerrill W. Sherman President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp Rhode
Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
§ 831.1781 Mentoring. ( a ) A phased retiree, other than an employee of the United States Postal Service, must spend at least 20 percent of his or her working hours in mentoring activities as defined by an authorized agency official. For purposes of this section, mentoring need not be limited to mentoring of an employee who is expected to assume the phased retiree's duties when the phased retiree fully retires.
( b ) An authorized agency official may waive the requirement under paragraph (a) of this section in the event of an emergency or other unusual circumstances (including active duty in the armed forces) that, in the authorized agency official's discretion, would make it impracticable for a phased retiree to fulfill the mentoring requirement.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|Date: March 15, 2005 |  | /s/KEVIN RAKINKevin Rakin Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### **CHAPTER 605—RECIDIVISM PREVENTION**

Sec.
60501.
Purposes; findings.
60502.
Definitions.
60503.
Submission of reports to Congress.
60504.
Rule of construction.
60505.
Audit and accountability of grantees.
60506.
Federal interagency reentry coordination.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NEW AND INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS TO IMPROVE OFFENDER REENTRY SERVICES

60511.
Careers training demonstration grants.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—ENHANCED DRUG TREATMENT AND MENTORING GRANT PROGRAMS

#### Part A—Drug Treatment

60521.
Offender reentry substance abuse and criminal justice collaboration program.

#### Part B—Mentoring

60531.
Community-based mentoring and transitional service grants to nonprofit organizations.
60532.
Repealed.
60533.
Bureau of Prisons policy on mentoring contacts.
60534.
Bureau of Prisons policy on chapel library materials.

#### Part C—Administration of Justice Reforms

#### subpart 1—improving federal offender reentry

60541.
Federal prisoner reentry initiative.

#### subpart 2—reentry research

60551.
Offender reentry research.
60552.
Grants to study parole or post-incarceration supervision violations and revocations.
60553.
Addressing the needs of children of incarcerated parents.
60554.
Repealed.
60555.
Authorization of appropriations for research.
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Nortek, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their knowledge:





1.
the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Richard L. Bready


Name: Richard L. Bready


Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Almon C. Hall


Name: Almon C. Hall


Title:    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### §150403. Membership

Subject to section 150406, eligibility for membership in the corporation, and the rights and privileges of members, shall be as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 936.)
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November
22, 2010





/s/
      B.J. SparksB.J.
      SparksChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Apr 23, 2007 14:47

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

LTR-07-0269

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 04/23/2007

GOV Kathleen Blanco

LA-GOV

Dale Klein

Energy Policy Act of 2005

C-EDO

S DEDMRS

DEDR

DEDIA

AO

12y

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

Appropriate

RF

04/18/2007

No

Made publicly available in ADAMS via EDO/DPC

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

KATHLEEN BABINEAUX BLANCO POST OFFICE BOX 94D04

GOVERNOR 70804.9004 (22n) 342-7015

April 18, 2007 VIA FACSIMILE: 301/415-3502

Attention: Ms. Janet Schlueter, Director

Division of Materials Safety and State Agreements

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 65 1(e) of the Energy Policy

Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced

radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections 1 Ie.(3) and 11 e.(4) of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

In 1967, the state of Louisiana entered into an Agreement with the Commission under Section

274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that agreement, the state of

Louisiana licenses byproduct material as defined by Section 1 le.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act.

In addition, the state of Louisiana licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator produced

radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the

program for licensing I le.(1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the

licensing program that would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy. Further, we

intend to continue to license the new byproduct material under this same program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the state of Louisiana has a program for licensing

byproduct material, as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section 1 le. of the Atomic Energy Act

of 1954, as amended, that is adequate to protect public health and safety, and that the state

intends to continue to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct

material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the Transition of

Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material".

Sincerely,

Kathleen Babineaux Blanco

Governor

jw

c: Secretary Mike D. McDaniel, Ph.D., Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVE MULLEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-56533

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01374-GHK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. King, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Steve Mullen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his independent action to set aside a prior judgment for fraud on the court under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
the dismissal of an independent action under Rule 60(b) for an abuse of discretion. 

Appling v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 340 F.3d 769, 780 (9th Cir. 2003). We

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Mullen’s

independent action because his allegations fail to state a facially plausible claim of

fraud on the court. See United States v. Beggerly, 524 U.S. 38, 47 (1998) (“[A]n

independent action should be available only to prevent a grave miscarriage of

justice.”); see also Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007) (claim

must be “plausible on its face”). Mullen’s allegation that the Department of Justice

Civil Rights Division could not locate an audio tape he requested in its central

filing system is insufficient to support a “plausible” inference that a United States

District Judge and two Assistant United States Attorneys conspired to fabricate that

tape. Bell Atl. Corp., 550 U.S. at 570.

AFFIRMED.

2
§ 831.811 Oversight of coverage determinations. ( a ) Upon deciding that a position is a nuclear materials courier position, the agency head must notify OPM (Attention: Associate Director for Retirement and Insurance) stating the title of each position, the number of incumbents, and whether the position is primary or secondary. The Director of OPM retains the authority to revoke the agency head's determination that a position is a primary or secondary position, or that an individual's service in any other position is creditable under 5 U.S.C. 8336(c).
( b ) The Department of Energy must establish a file containing each coverage determination made by the agency head under § 831.803 and § 831.804, and all background material used in making the determination.
( c ) Upon request by OPM, the Department of Energy will make available the entire coverage determination file for OPM to audit to ensure compliance with the provisions of this subpart.
( d ) Upon request by OPM, the Department of Energy must submit to OPM a list of all covered positions and any other pertinent information requested.
```

[107th Congress Public Law 40]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ040.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 224]]

Public Law 107-40
107th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
    To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those 
     responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United 
           States. <<NOTE: Sept. 18, 2001 -  [S.J. Res. 23]>> 

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were 
    committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the 
    United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect 
    United States citizens both at home and abroad; and
Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign 
    policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; 
    and
Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat 
    to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; 
    and
Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take 
    action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against 
    the United States: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Authorization for Use 
of Military Force. 50 USC 1541 note.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This joint resolution may be cited as the ``Authorization for Use of 
Military Force''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

    (a)  <<NOTE: President.>> In General.--That the President is 
authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those 
nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, 
committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 
2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any 
future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such 
nations, organizations or persons.

    (b) War Powers Resolution Requirements.--
            (1) Specific statutory authorization.--Consistent with 
        section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress 
        declares that this section is intended to constitute specific 
        statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of 
        the War Powers Resolution.

[[Page 115 STAT. 225]]

            (2) Applicability of other requirements.--Nothing in this 
        resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers 
        Resolution.

    Approved September 18, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S.J. Res. 23 (H.J. Res. 64):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Sept. 14, considered and passed Senate and House.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 37 (2001):
            Sept. 18, Presidential statement.

                                  <all>
```
### §319. Appeal

A party dissatisfied with the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board under section 318(a) may appeal the decision pursuant to sections 141 through 144. Any party to the inter partes review shall have the right to be a party to the appeal.

(Added Pub. L. 112–29, §6(a), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 304.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued before, on, or after that effective date, with provisions for graduated implementation, see section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment note under section 311 of this title.
No. I-08-035 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

May 24, 2008

NRC MONITORING UNUSUAL EVENT AT MILLSTONE 2 NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is monitoring an Unusual Event declared 

this morning at the Millstone 2 nuclear power plant in Waterford, Conn. An Unusual Event is the 

lowest of four levels of emergency classification used by the NRC. 

At 9:38 a.m. today, Millstone 2 lost off-site power for reasons that are still being 

investigated. (Nuclear power plants, besides sending electricity to the grid, also use a small 

percentage of their electrical output to power certain operational equipment.) In response, plant 

owner and operator Dominion declared an Unusual Event at 9:54 a.m. due to a loss of off-site 

power for greater than 15 minutes. 

As designed, the pressurized-water reactor shut down and the plant’s two emergency 

diesel generators, which provide back-up power when off-site power is lost, started to provide 

electricity to key safety systems. One of two required off-site power sources has been restored to 

the plant’s electrical distribution system. That occurred at approximately 11:06 a.m. 

Millstone 2 was in the process of being restarted and was at a low power level at the time 

of the event. The unit had been shut down on May 22 in response to a turbine trip, or shutdown, 

believed to be caused by a lightning strike at a substation located about 2 1⁄2 miles from the plant. 

Dominion continues to evaluate the root cause of the May 22 shutdown and whether there is any 

connection between the electrical problem that caused that event and the loss of off-site power 

earlier today. 

The NRC began formally monitoring the event at 10:24 a.m. today. A Resident Inspector 

assigned to the plant was already on-site at the time of the event to monitor the plant start-up 

from the May 22nd shutdown and immediately began monitoring the company’s actions in 

response to the shutdown. In addition, the Incident Response Center at the NRC’s Region I 

Office in King of Prussia, Pa., was activated to track developments at the plant, maintain close 

communications, and determine if any additional actions were needed. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
Millstone 3, an adjoining pressurized-water reactor owned and operated by Dominion, 

was not affected by the event and continues to operate at 100-percent power. 

Federal and state officials have been notified regarding the event. 

 

 #