alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henrietta P. Messing, Appellant, v. Herman Messing, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7721
MAXIE D. EVANS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DE PARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GERALDINE P. MIRO; CHARLIE CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-972-0-20BD) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maxie D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson, RobertEric Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. South Carolina Dep't of Corr. , No. CA-96- 972-0-20BD (D.S.C. Oct. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Adams, Kevin (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Kevin, mike fell <mike@pathfinderaviation.com> Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:24 PM. Adams, Kevin (OST) diomede essential air service

Pathfinder Aviation is interested in providing a proposal for the Diomede essential air service contract. We are requesting a two week extension on the deadline. We were late receiving the RFP and wish to have a little more time to put our proposal together. Regards,



### Mike Fell PathfinderAviation Inc. www.

### pathfinderaviation. com mike@pathfinderaviation. com mikefell@mac.com 907-299-2800 cell 907-226-2800 ofc

1 .. :' ---·

...·.. ,·-**-~.** :-·--< : ...

.:·,··
**Part II, Section B, Item 1(b) Operation Description TS**  **- C50**  **79 P**
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kulwant Sandher, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Kulwant Sandher


Kulwant Sandher


Chief Financial Officer


Principal Financial Officer







Date: September 14, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1745 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1745

   To express the sense of the Congress that funding should be made 
 available from the Highway Trust Fund to encourage States to require 
  law enforcement officers to impound motor vehicles of those charged 
        with driving while intoxicated, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2003

 Mr. LoBiondo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To express the sense of the Congress that funding should be made 
 available from the Highway Trust Fund to encourage States to require 
  law enforcement officers to impound motor vehicles of those charged 
        with driving while intoxicated, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that funding should be made available 
from the Highway Trust Fund to encourage States to require law 
enforcement officers to impound motor vehicles of individuals charged 
with operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and to issue 
responsibility warnings to individuals who take custody of suspects of 
driving while intoxicated.

SEC. 2. NTSB STUDY AND REPORT.

    (a) Study.--The National Transportation Safety Board shall conduct 
a study on--
            (1) the number of States that have adopted laws to impound 
        the motor vehicles of individuals charged with driving while 
        intoxicated; and
            (2) the number and severity of traffic accidents caused by 
        individuals who were released by State and local police hours 
        after being charged with driving while intoxicated.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Board shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
of the study, together with recommendations on the need for States to 
enact vehicle impoundment laws for those charged with driving while 
intoxicated and the effectiveness of such laws in States which have 
already enacted such laws.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated
in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, WU
Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
|Date:December 1, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ WU Yuxiang                 |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Name: WU Yuxiang               |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 5201.103 Fundraising activities. Notwithstanding 5 CFR 2635.808(c)(1)(i), an employee of any separate agency component listed in this section may, in a personal capacity, personally solicit funds from a person who is a prohibited source if person is a prohibited source for employees of the component only under 5 CFR 2635.203(d)(3) because the person conducts activities regulated by the component: ( a ) The Wage and Hour Division;
( b ) The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs;
( c ) The Remainder of the Employment Standards Administration, as defined in § 5201.102(c);
( d ) Occupational Safety and Health Administration;
( e ) Employee Benefits Security Administration;
( f ) Veterans' Employment and Training Service; and
( g ) The Remainder of the Department of Labor, as defined in § 5201.102(c).
Example 1: A training official in the Mine Safety and Health Administration is president of the local branch of her college alumni association. The association is seeking used computers from local businesses to upgrade the college's language lab. The employee may not seek a contribution from the vice president of a mining company which is regulated by MSHA. Even though the mining company is not currently under investigation, it is a prohibited source for the employment because it is subject to MSHA regulation and MSHA is not one of the agency components designated as separate for the purpose of fundraising in a personal capacity.
Example 2: A typist in the Employee Benefits Security Administration raises money for a local homeless shelter during his off-duty hours. He may seek a contribution from a firm that is regulated by EBSA under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act but may not seek contributions from one that he knows is currently under investigation for a violation of the Act. While firms regulated by an agency would ordinarily be prohibited sources for purposes of an employee's fundraising in a personal capacity, § 5201.103 provides that employees of EBSA and the other separate agency components listed in that section may seek charitable contributions from an entity that is a prohibited source only because its activities are subject to regulation by that separate agency component. On the other hand, the employee may not engage in fundraising from a person who he knows is a prohibited source for any other reason, such as an ongoing enforcement action.
Example 3: An employee of the Employment and Training Administration may seek charitable contributions from a firm currently under investigation by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). ETA does not regulate this firm and has had no dealings or business with it of any kind. Since ETA has been designated as a separate agency under § 5201.102, ETA employees need only consider their own official duties and activities and those of ETA in determining whether a person is a prohibited source for purposes of their fundraising in a personal capacity. The fact that a person may be a prohibited source of direct and indirect gifts for OSHA employees is not relevant in this instance.
[61 FR 57284, Nov. 6, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 16398, Apr. 3, 2003]
No. III-07-024 

Contact: Viktoria Mitlyng 

Phone: 630-829-9663 

 October 23, 2007 

 E-Mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Web site: http://www.nrc.gov

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT BYRON NUCLEAR STATION TO REVIEW 

CORROSION AND LEAKAGE OF EQUIPMENT COOLING WATER PIPING 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection at the Byron Nuclear 

Power Station to review the circumstance surrounding the corrosion of piping in the equipment 

cooling water system and subsequent leak in one pipe. The two-reactor station, which is located 

near Byron, Ill., is operated by Exelon Generation Co. 

 As a result of the leakage, reactor operators shut both reactors down on Friday, Oct. 19, 

to repair the leak and inspect similar pipes. The pipes carry water from the plant where it is used 

for cooling of essential safety equipment back to basins under fan-driven cooling towers. Other 

systems provide cooling water to the reactors. 

 The NRC inspectors will review the utility’s previous inspections of the eight similar 

pipes in the system, called the essential service water system. Corrosion had previously been 

observed on the exterior of the pipes and plant workers were performing further inspections and 

tests when the leak developed. The cooling water carried by the pipes is not radioactive. 

 “The inspection team will consider the utility’s handling of the pipe corrosion and the 

decision-making which led to the shut down of the two reactors,” said James Caldwell, NRC 

Region III Administrator. “Our resident inspectors were onsite during the reactor shutdown, and 

reported that all safety systems functioned normally during the shutdown.” 

 The NRC team will also monitor the utility’s ongoing analysis of the pipe corrosion and 

leakage and any repair activities. 

 A written inspection report will be issued four to six weeks following the completion of 

the inspection. It will be available on the NRC web site – www.nrc.gov – and from the NRC 

Region III Office of Public Affairs. 

 ### 

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region III 

2443 Warrenville Road 

Lisle IL 60532
### §130311. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be distributed as provided by the board of directors, but in compliance with the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1376.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130311 | 36:645. | Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 546, §15, 69 Stat. 490. |

Section

The words "dissolution or final liquidation" are substituted for "final dissolution or liquidation" for consistency in the revised title. The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "as provided by" are substituted for "in accordance with the determination of" for consistency in the revised title. The words "all Federal and State laws applicable thereto" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### Laurie J. Carpenter, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 28296.)

—Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims dismissing the claimant’s claim for damages arising out of alleged fraud, irregularities, torts and misfeasance on the part of the State and its officers and employees in the handling of a workmen’s compensation matter. The evidence fails to substantiate the claim. Moreover, the acts complained of took place some ten or twenty years ago and any rights which the claimant may have had have long since been foreclosed by the Statute of Limitations. (Court of Claims Act, § 10; L. 1939, ch. 860.) Order affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Brewster, Foster, Bussell and Deyo, JJ. [See post, p. 1041.]
Exhibit31.2I, Eyal Kolka, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TopSpin Medical, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;     (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.         Date: November 8, 2007 /s/ Eyal Kolka   Eyal Kolka   Chief Financial Officer
### §12554. Designation of lead agency and submission of State plan

#### (a) Lead agency

A State that desires to participate in the Police Corps program under this part shall designate a lead agency that will be responsible for—

(1) submitting to the Director a State plan described in subsection (b); and

(2) administering the program in the State.

#### (b) State plans

A State plan shall—

(1) contain assurances that the lead agency shall work in cooperation with the local law enforcement liaisons, representatives of police labor organizations and police management organizations, and other appropriate State and local agencies to develop and implement interagency agreements designed to carry out the program;

(2) contain assurances that the State shall advertise the assistance available under this part;

(3) contain assurances that the State shall screen and select law enforcement personnel for participation in the program; and

(4) meet the requirements of section 12559 of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XX, §200105, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2050.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14094 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24889]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Extension of Public Comment Period: Louisiana Energy Services 
National Enrichment Facility

AGENCY: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NRC is extending the public comment period for the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Proposed National 
Enrichment Facility in Lea County, New Mexico (NUREG-1790) that was to 
end on November 6, 2004. The original notice of availability of the 
DEIS appeared in the Federal Register on September 17, 2004 (69 FR 
56104).
    On October 25, 2004, the NRC initiated an additional security 
review of publicly available documents to ensure that potentially 
sensitive information is removed from the ADAMS database accessible 
through the NRC's Web site. Interested members of the public should 
check the NRC's Web pages for updates on the availability of documents 
through the ADAMS system. This extension of the public comment period 
is appropriate to allow members of the public adequate opportunity to 
obtain access to relevant documents in ADAMS in order to comment on the 
DEIS. Therefore, the public comment period is being extended until 
December 18, 2004.
    Members of the public are invited and encouraged to submit comments 
to the Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, Mail Stop T6-D59, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Please 
note Docket No. 70-3103 when submitting comments. Written comments 
submitted by mail should be postmarked by December 18, 2004, to ensure 
consideration. Comments mailed after that date will be considered to 
the extent practical.
    Comments will also be accepted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3cdd1c0d1c6d3e3cdd1c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d637f6e7f687d4d637f6e236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>, or by 
facsimile to 301-415-5397, Attention: Anna Bradford.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general or technical information 
associated with the license review of the National Enrichment Facility, 
please contact Timothy Johnson at (301) 415-7299. For general 
information on the NRC environmental review process, please contact 
Anna Bradford at (301) 415-5228.

    Signed in Rockville, MD, this 2nd day of November, 2004.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
B. Jennifer Davis,
Chief, Environmental and Low-Level Waste Section, Division of Waste 
Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Nuclear Material 
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 04-24889 Filed 11-8-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 724.104 Procedures. ( a ) The procedures that agencies must use to reimburse the Judgment Fund are those prescribed by the Financial Management Service (FMS), the Department of the Treasury, in Chapter 3100 of the Treasury Financial Manual. All reimbursements to the Judgment Fund covered by the No FEAR Act are expected to be fully collectible from the agency. FMS will provide written notice to the agency's Chief Financial Officer within 15 business days after payment from the Judgment Fund.
( b ) Within 45 business days of receiving the FMS notice, agencies must reimburse the Judgment Fund or contact FMS to make arrangements in writing for reimbursement.