alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION BY SCOTT W. BRICKMAN



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Brickman Group, Ltd. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Scott W. Brickman, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 10, 2003
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Scott W. Brickman  
|Scott W. Brickman      
|Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies each
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 838.123 Claimants' responsibilities. Claimants are responsible for— ( a ) Filing a certified copy of court orders and all other required supporting information with OPM;
( b ) Keeping OPM advised of their current mailing addresses;
( c ) Notifying OPM of any changes in circumstances that could affect their entitlement to benefits; and
( d ) Submitting all disputes with employees or retirees to the appropriate State court for resolution.
# L_2016079EN.01000101.xml

| 30.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The Additional Protocol to the Agreement on Trade, Development and Cooperation between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of South Africa, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (1), notified on 29 July 2015 and 24 February 2016 respectively, has, in accordance with Article 7(1) thereof, entered into force on 1 March 2016.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 3.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.2

                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                CERTIFICATION

I, James R. Simmons, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Northborough Holdings,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
        entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
        is being prepared;

     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
        annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
        of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
        the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
        for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal
        controls; and

     b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls; and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: June 5, 2003

By:

/s/ James R. Simmons

JAMES R. SIMMONS,
Chief Executive Officer
#### William H. Williams, Respondent, v. Thaddeus J. Osinski, Defendant, and Raymond Stankiewicz, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. ■ The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PRISONS
§ 839.821 Who is responsible for correcting my records? ( a ) Your current employer will correct your records in accordance with OPM instructions. Your employer must not delay correcting your records.
( b ) For former employees and retirees, the last employer will correct the records. For survivors, the employee's last employer will correct the records. If an employer no longer exists as an organization, and there is no successor agency, then OPM will correct the records.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1548-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-1548-DR), dated September 15, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 22, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is reopened. The incident period for this declared disaster is now September 13, 2004, through and including September 26, 2004. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individual and Household Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-24179 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Brian Shenkman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of W-Candy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2005,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of W-Candy, Inc

   June 20, 2006

                                     By:/s/ Brian Shenkman
                                     Brian Shenkman, CEO





<PAGE>
#### SARVIS v. PIEDMONT & N. RY. CO.

No. 6817.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1954.

Decided July 16, 1954.

Basil L. Whitener and Grady B. Stott, Gastonia, N. C. (Henry L. Kiser, Bessemer City, N. C., on brief), for appellant.

Carl Horn, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (W. S. O’B. Robinson, Jr., and W. B. McGuire, Jr., Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in an action for damages heard in the court below by the judge without a jury. Plaintiff had gone upon the premises of defendant for the purpose of buying some cantaloupes. He climbed into a box car at the invitation of defendant with this end in view and was injured when jumping out of the car to the ground. He contends that he was a business visitor or invitee on the premises and that defendant was negligent in failing to provide him a safe means of getting from the car to the ground. The trial judge found that there was no negligence on the part of the defendant and that plaintiff’s injury was due to his own negligence. We find nothing in the record which would justify our interfering with these findings.

Affirmed.
#### Herman Wennemer, Inc., Appellant, v. John T. Brady & Co., Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 733.]
### §150304. Annual meeting

The corporation shall hold an annual meeting at a place designated by the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1389.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150304 | 36:253 (words before 1st comma). | Mar. 3, 1863, ch. 111, §3 (words before 1st comma), 12 Stat. 806. |

Section
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Adira Energy Ltd. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Hezi Kugler, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: November 21, 2011 | /s/ Hezi KuglerHezi Kugler
Chief Executive Officer 
(principal executive officer)
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0082 - Rulemaking to Make Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant Accident Technical Requirements; 10 CFR 50.46a, "Alternative Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light-Water Nuclear Power Reactors"

Accession Number: ML070180692

Date Released: Friday, June 1, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML070180466 - SECY-07-0082 - Rulemaking to Make Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant Accident Technical Requirements; 10 Cfr 50.46a, "Alternative Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light-Water Nuclear Power Reactors" (8 page(s), 5/16/2007)
    - ML070460275 - SECY-07-0082 - Encl 1 - Rule Overview and Summary of ACRS Recommendations (7 page(s), 5/16/2007)
    - ML070870226 - SECY-07-0082 - Encl 2 - Resource Estimate to Address ACRS Issues and Complete Rule (1 page(s), 5/16/2007)
    - ML071370411 - SECY-07-0082 - Encl 3 - Non-Concurrence on Rulemaking to make Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant Accident Technical Requirements (10 CFR 50.46a) (5 page(s), 4/29/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 32



Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief
Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Entravision Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2011 |  |  |  | /S/    WALTER F.
ULLOA                      
|                     |  |  |  | Walter F. Ulloa Chief Executive Officer     
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 11, 2011 |  |  |  | /S/    CHRISTOPHER T.
YOUNG                 
|                     |  |  |  | Christopher T. Young Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Joseph Gomez

Appellate case number: 01-20-00004-CR & 01-20-00005-CR

Trial court case number: 1657519 & 1657521

Trial court: 338th District Court of Harris County

The motion for rehearing is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Peter Kelly

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris.

Date: November 1, 2022
#### In the Matter of New York Central Railroad Company, RespondentAppellant, against William E. Boyland et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Appellants-Respondents. [277 Park Ave., Borough of Manhattan.]

Order unanimously modified' so as to fix the building value at $2,300,000 for each year under review and, as so modified, affirmed. The record supports that value. Settle order on notice. Present ■ — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Breitel, JJ.
Manager, Flight Standards Service

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office

FAA Headquarters, Building 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 11367 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0072)

Attention: FAA UAS Integration Office

This is a request for an amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 11367 to add 

additional aircraft to Texas UAV Professionals authorized commercial operations. On April 17, 2015, the 

FAA granted this Petition for Exemption to operate small unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of 

conducting inspections for utility and construction industries. The Petitioner now seeks an amendment 

to its exemption authorizing the operation of additional aircraft as described in the confidential and 

proprietary operations manuals submitted in support of this amendment request. 

Additional Aircraft:

TUP X8A-2100 - Manual sent separately to 333exemptions@faa.gov

TUP’s existing safety standards, maintenance, operational parameters and procedures outlined in our 

Manual will continue for the additional aircraft.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you 

should have any questions.

Best regards, 

Curtis Youngblood

Texas UAV Professionals

5205 Sycamore Hills Court

College Station, TX 77845

979-828-4269

Curtis@texasdroneprofessionals.com
J~~SED STqTFS 

r'~ A '2 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C . 20460 

JUN 1 0 2009 

OFFICE OF 

WATER 

Mr. Charles B. Husick 

President, OWA, Inc. 

1375 Pinellas Bayway, #29 

St. Petersburg, FL 33715-2133 

Dear Mr. Husick: 

Thank you for your letter dated March 4, 2009, to Senator Bill Nelson, regarding 

marine sanitation device (MSD) standards for controlling sewage discharges from 

vessels. Senator Nelson referred your letter to the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) for consideration and requested that we respond to you directly . 

Your letter suggests that EPA should revise the Type I MSD standards (which 

apply to vessels under 65 feet in length) and no discharge zone (NDZ) rules promulgated 

pursuant to CWA Section 312. With regard to your suggestion that boats equipped with 

these devices should be allowed to discharge in NDZs, CWA section 312(f) (3) 

contemplates that NDZs will prohibit discharge of both treated and untreated sewage in 

NDZs. For example, CWA §312(f) (3) states, a "State may completely prohibit the 

discharge from all vessels of any sewage, whether treated or not . . . ." In addition, we 

note that reducing bacteria levels alone may not make MSD discharge in a given area 

acceptable . Other components in MSD effluent, based on the performance evaluation 

you mentioned in your letter, may also be of concern to the States that designate NDZs. 

For example, residual chlorine and nutrients are of environmental concern in many areas. 

EPA is developing several new regulations and permits for vessel discharges ; 

however, at this time we are not actively revising MSD standards . We appreciate your 

opinions and suggestions regarding Type l MSD standards and will consider them in our 

discussions regarding future regulation of vessel discharges under the CWA. 

Internet Address (URL) ~ http ://www .epa .gov 

Recycled/Recyclable ~ Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%, Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
Again, thank you for your letter . If you have further questions, please contact 

Paul Cough, Director of the Oceans and Coastal Protection Division, at (202) 566-0688 . 

Sincerely, 

Michael H. Shapiro 

Acting Assistant Administrator 

cc : The Honorable Bill Nelson
### §20945. Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Department of Justice, under the general authority of the Attorney General, an Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "SMART Office").

#### (b) Director

The SMART Office shall be headed by a Director who shall be appointed by the President. The Director shall report to the Attorney General through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs and shall have final authority for all grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts awarded by the SMART Office. The Director shall not engage in any employment other than that of serving as the Director, nor shall the Director hold any office in, or act in any capacity for, any organization, agency, or institution with which the Office makes any contract or other arrangement.

#### (c) Duties and functions

The SMART Office is authorized to—

(1) administer the standards for the sex offender registration and notification program set forth in this chapter;

(2) administer grant programs relating to sex offender registration and notification authorized by this chapter and other grant programs authorized by this chapter as directed by the Attorney General;

(3) cooperate with and provide technical assistance to States, units of local government, tribal governments, and other public and private entities involved in activities related to sex offender registration or notification or to other measures for the protection of children or other members of the public from sexual abuse or exploitation; and

(4) perform such other functions as the Attorney General may delegate.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title I, §146, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 607.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (c)(1), (2), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 109–248, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 587, known as the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2006 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16945 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### Hillary Holding Corporation v. Brooklyn Jockey Club. Brooklyn Jockey Club v. Hillary Holding Corporation et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present— Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 538.]
Second Department,

October, 1953.

(October 5, 1953.)

#### Brooklyn Fire Brick Works, Inc., Appellant, v. James W. Clark et al., Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division denied, with $10 costs. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.