alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, B. K. Chin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s latest fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.November 7, 2007                                                                /s/ B. K. Chin   B. K. Chin   Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 3, 2013

NO. 03-12-00272-CR

Kevin Howard, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s 

judgment of conviction: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that 

the judgment of conviction of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that

this decision be certified below for observance.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Global  Envirotech,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Carl L.
Urich,  President,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the
company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Carl L. Urich
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Carl L. Urich, President, CEO & CFO

Dated: August 12, 2005
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 19

- 00431

- CR

__________________ JOHN WESLEY HARDIN III , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 163rd District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. B150077

- R

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
John Wesley Hardin III has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and
joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is
granted, and t he appeal is therefore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM2 Submitted on January 7, 20 20 Opinion Delivered January 8, 20 20 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2055 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment 

in the number of free roaming horses permitted in Cape 

Lookout National Seashore. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 2055 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN THE NUMBER OF FREE ROAM2 ING HORSES PERMITTED IN CAPE LOOKOUT 

3 NATIONAL SEASHORE, NC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first subsection (b) of section 

5 5 of Public Law 89–366 (16 U.S.C. 459g–4) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘100 free 

8 roaming horses’’ and inserting ‘‘not less than 110 

9 free roaming horses, with a target population of be10 tween 120 and 130 free roaming horses,’’; 

11 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

12 (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

13 ‘‘(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a 

14 plan to maintain the viability of the herd; or’’; and 

15 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘100’’ and in16 serting ‘‘110’’. 

17 (b) REPEAL OF DUPLICATE SUBSECTIONS.—Section 

18 5 of Public Law 89–366 is amended— 

19 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a)’’ after 

20 ‘‘(a)’’; and 

21 (2) by striking the second subsection (b). 

Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
§ 831.804 Conditions for coverage in secondary positions. ( a ) An employee's service in a position that has been determined by the Secretary of the Department of Energy to be a secondary nuclear materials courier position following 3 years of service in a primary nuclear materials courier position is covered under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336(c) if all of the following criteria are met: ( 1 ) The employee is transferred directly (*i.e.,* without a break in service exceeding 3 days) from a primary position to a secondary position; and
( 2 ) If applicable, the employee has been continuously employed in secondary positions since transferring from a primary position without a break in service exceeding 3 days, except that a break in employment in secondary positions which begins with an involuntary separation (not for cause), within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 8336(d)(1), is not considered in determining whether the service in secondary positions is continuous for this purpose.
( b ) An employee who is not in a primary position, nor covered while in a secondary position, and who is detailed or temporarily promoted to a secondary position is not covered under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8336(c).
### SUBCHAPTER I—CORPORATION
No. IV-08-040 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 October 21, 2008 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT 

CONFERENCE WITH SABIA, INC. 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a pre-decisional enforcement 

conference on Nov. 10 with officials from Sabia, Inc., of Idaho Falls, Idaho, to discuss apparent 

violations of NRC requirements for the handling and use of radioactive materials. 

 The apparent violations stem from a Feb. 29 incident at the company’s lab during which 

several workers were exposed to radioactive Strontium-90 when a sealed source was breached. 

The apparent violations involve inadequacies in the company’s radiation protection program and 

failure to perform a leak test of a radioactive source when it was removed from storage prior to 

use. 

 The apparent violations are described in an NRC inspection report that is publicly 

available on the NRC’s web site or from the NRC’s Public Document Room (ADAMS 

Accession Number ML082940325.) 

 The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 8 a.m. in the NRC’s 

Region IV offices in Arlington, Texas. The public will have an opportunity to observe and ask 

questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned. Members of the public can listen to 

the meeting via special telephone line by calling 1-800-952-9677 and asking to be connected to 

the meeting. 

 No decision on the final significance, the apparent violations or any contemplated 

enforcement action will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC 

officials at a later date. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
#### Mildred Kohn, Plaintiff, v. Transocean Merchandise Exchange Incorporated, Respondent. Samuel C. Cohen, Respondent; Angelo P. Sereni et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Sereni & Herzfeld, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 409—NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM**

Sec.
40901.
Establishment.
40902.
Findings.
40903.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—TRANSMITTAL OF RECORDS

40911.
Enhancement of requirement that Federal departments and agencies provide relevant information to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.
40912.
Requirements to obtain waiver.
40913.
Implementation assistance to States.
40914.
Penalties for noncompliance.
40915.
Relief from disabilities program required as condition for participation in grant programs.
40916.
Illegal immigrant gun purchase notification.
40917.
Implementation plan.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—FOCUSING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF RELEVANT RECORDS

40931.
Continuing evaluations.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—GRANTS TO STATE COURT SYSTEMS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT IN AUTOMATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF DISPOSITION RECORDS

40941.
Disposition records automation and transmittal improvement grants.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1549

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore and make permanent 

the exclusion from gross income for amounts received under qualified 

group legal services plans and to increase the maximum amount of 

the exclusion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2003

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore 

and make permanent the exclusion from gross income 

for amounts received under qualified group legal services 

plans and to increase the maximum amount of the exclusion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1549 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER 

2 QUALIFIED GROUP LEGAL SERVICES PLANS 

3 RESTORED AND MADE PERMANENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 120 of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section and 

8 section 501(c)(20) shall apply to taxable years begin9 ning—

10 ‘‘(1) after December 31, 1976, and before July 

11 1, 1992, and 

12 ‘‘(2) after December 31, 2001.’’

13 (b) INCREASE IN MAXIMUM EXCLUSION.—The last 

14 sentence of section 120(a) of such Code is amended by 

15 striking ‘‘$70’’ and inserting ‘‘$150’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2001.

Æ
#### § 353.108 Effect of performance and conduct on restoration rights.

The laws covered by this part do not permit an agency to circumvent the protections afforded by other laws to employees who face the involuntary loss of their positions. Thus, an employee may not be denied restoration rights because of poor performance or conduct that occurred prior to the employee's departure for compensable injury or uniformed service. However, separation for cause that is substantially unrelated to the injury or to the performance of uniformed service negates restoration rights. Additionally, if during the period of injury or uniformed service the employee's conduct is such that it would disqualify him or her for employment under OPM or agency regulations, restoration rights may be denied.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                                         |                                  |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                    |                             |
| Date:              April 18, 2007 | By:                                                | /s/ Lawrence              Taylor |
|                              | Name: Lawrence              Taylor                      |
|                              | Title:              Principal              Financial Officer |

----
§ 841.409 Agency right to appeal normal cost percentage. ( a ) An agency with at least 1,000 employees in the general category of employees or 500 employees in any of the special categories may appeal to the Board the normal cost percentage for that category as applied to that agency.
( b ) No appeal will be considered by the Board unless the agency files, no later than 6 months after the date of publication of the notice of normal cost percentages under § 841.407, a petition for appeal that meets *all* the requirements of § 841.410.
[82 FR 49280, Oct. 25, 2017]
§ 2471.11 Final action by the Panel. ( a ) If the parties do not arrive at a settlement as a result of or during actions taken under §§ 2471.6(a)(2), 2471.7, 2471.8, 2471.9, and 2471.10, the Panel may take whatever action is necessary and not inconsistent with 5 U.S.C. chapter 71 to resolve the impasse, including but not limited to, methods and procedures which the Panel considers appropriate, such as directing the parties to accept a factfinder's recommendations, ordering binding arbitration conducted according to whatever procedure the Panel deems suitable, and rendering a binding decision.
( b ) In preparation for taking such final action, the Panel may hold hearings, administer oaths, take the testimony or deposition of any person under oath, and issue subpenas as provided in 5 U.S.C. 7132, or it may appoint or designate one or more individuals pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7119(c)(4) to exercise such authority on its behalf.
( c ) When the exercise of authority under this section requires the holding of a hearing, the procedure contained in § 2471.8 shall apply.
( d ) Notice of any final action of the Panel shall be promptly served upon the parties, and the action shall be binding on such parties during the term of the agreement, unless they agree otherwise.
[45 FR 3520, Jan. 17, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 19694, May 2, 1983]
#### § 841.501 Purpose.

This subpart contains regulations concerning deductions from employees' pay and government contributions for FERS coverage.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0050 - Firearms Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Associated Policy Issues

Accession Number: ML072920478

Date Released: Monday, September 14, 2009

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML072920440 - SECY-08-0050 - Firearms Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Associated Policy Issues (13 page(s), 4/17/2008)
    - ML072920513 - SECY-08-0050 - Enclosure 2: Analysis of Firearms Guidelines Changes and Impacts on the Proposed Power Reactor Security Rule (5 page(s), 4/17/2008)
    - ML072920527 - SECY-08-0050 - Enclosure 3: Proposed Application of Section 161A. Authority to Various Classes of NRC-Regulated Facilities and Activities (7 page(s), 4/17/2008)
    - ML072950256 - SECY-08-0050- Enclosure 4: Implementation Timelines and Tasks (6 page(s), 4/17/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 842.1204 Additional interest due to administrative error. ( a ) The agency, Clerk of the House of Representatives, or Secretary of the Senate, as appropriate, may pay any additional interest due on the deposit for volunteer or volunteer leader service as a result of its administrative error. OPM may pay any additional interest due on the deposit for VISTA service as a result of its administrative error.
( b ) The agency, Clerk of the House of Representatives, or Secretary of the Senate, as appropriate, shall set their own procedures for employees or Members to claim there was administrative error. OPM shall set its own procedures for claims of administrative error on its part.
( c ) The agency, Clerk of the House of Representatives, or Secretary of the Senate, as appropriate, shall determine if administrative error on its part caused an increase in interest due on the deposit amount. OPM shall determine if administrative error on its part caused an increase in interest due on the deposit amount.
( d ) OPM's final determination regarding a claim of administrative error on its part is not subject to the due process procedures described in 5 U.S.C. 8461(e).
GAO-01-892R Aviation Hall of Fame

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

June 26, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

 Report for the Aviation Hall of Fame for 1999 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Aviation Hall of Fame, a federally chartered corporation, for the years ended

December 31, 1999 and 1998. The corporation’s purpose is to honor citizens, aviation

leaders, pilots, and others for outstanding contributions to the establishment,

development, advancement, or improvement of aviation, and to perpetuate the

memory of them and record their contributions.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-892R Aviation Hall of Fame

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(194040)
#### Mary HIANG and Consuella Terrell *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 04-74

146 S.W.3d 894

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 12, 2004

*Gregory E. Bryant,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellants Mary Hiang and Consuella Terrell, by and through their attorney, Gregory E. Bryant, have filed a motion for rule on clerk. Mr. Bryant admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record due to a mistake on his part.

*121We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. *See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964 (1979) *(per curiam).*

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.