alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §171. Patents for designs

(a) In General.—Whoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

(b) Applicability of This Title.—The provisions of this title relating to patents for inventions shall apply to patents for designs, except as otherwise provided.

(c) Filing Date.—The filing date of an application for patent for design shall be the date on which the specification as prescribed by section 112 and any required drawings are filed.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 805; Pub. L. 112–211, title II, §202(a), Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1535.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §73 (R.S. 4929, amended (1) May 9, 1902, ch. 783, 32 Stat. 193, (2) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 450, §1, 53 Stat. 1212; R.S. 4933).

The list of conditions specified in the corresponding section of existing statute is omitted as unnecessary in view of the general inclusion of all conditions applying to other patents. Language is changed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2012—Pub. L. 112–211 designated first and second pars. as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, inserted headings, and added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–211 effective on the date that is 1 year after Dec. 18, 2012, applicable to patents issued before, on, or after that effective date and patent applications pending on or filed after that effective date, and not effective with respect to patents in litigation commenced before that effective date, see section 203 of Pub. L. 112–211, set out as an Effective Date note under section 27 of this title.
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In    connection with the Quarterly Report of China Media Group Corporation a Texas corporation    (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months period ending June 30, 2011, as    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Cheng Pheng LOI, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to    the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Media Group Corporation, and will be retained by China Media Group Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
    /s/ Cheng Pheng LOI
--------------------------
Cheng    Pheng LOI
Chief    Executive Officer
August    22, 2011 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Presidential Documents

65277 

Federal Register 

Vol. 83, No. 243 

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of December 18, 2018 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Serious Human Rights Abuse and Corruption 

On December 20, 2017, by Executive Order 13818, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world and, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), took related steps to deal with 

the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, 

and economy of the United States. 

The prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that 

have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, 

continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the 

national emergency declared on December 20, 2017, must continue in effect 

beyond December 20, 2018. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13818 with 

respect to serious human rights abuse and corruption. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

December 18, 2018. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27660 

Filed 12–18–18; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F9–P 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PRESDOC2Trump.EPS</GPH>
GAO-01-890R American Gold Star Mothers, Incorporated

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

June 25, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the American Gold Star Mothers, Incorporated, for Fiscal Years

2000 and 1999

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

American Gold Star Mothers, Incorporated, a federally chartered corporation, for the

fiscal years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999. The corporation was established in 1928

for the purpose of perpetuating the ideals of Americanism for which members’

relatives fought and died.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the

auditors’ working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of

noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO–01-890R American Gold Star Mothers, Incorporated

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly on a modified cash basis of accounting. We are

returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(194038)
#### Virginia P. G. Benjamin, Appellant, v. Henry R. Benjamin, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Bruce Gordon < bruce@btpost.net> 

Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:20 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Excursion Inlet EAS Contract 

PGP.sig 

2011 OCT 2b P 3: 2Cl 

I realize this is a bit late, but I just returned from a two week vacation, to the FlatLands 

and am just now getting to the backlog of eMails, that had accumulated. 

Concerning the Excursion Inlet, Alaska EAS Contract, I am speaking for the LOCAL Residents 

that are here, NOW and a few of the summer LOCAL Residents that I have talked to, recently. 

We are very pleased with the Air Excursions contract, and the SERVICE they are providing. 

They remember to Call, on Wheels Up, in Juneau, and have been very easy to work with, since 

the change in Carriers on Sept. 15,2012. 

One thing that shows the lack of communications from Wings of Alaska, the previous Carrier, 

· is an issue that happened, in last week of August, 2012. Wings decided to change to their "Winter 

Schedule, (One a Week, Service) with NO Notification, to either the Cannery, (Ocean Beauty Seafoods) 

the Post Office, or Myself. The Cannery was still operating, with 60 employees, and continued to operate 

until Sept 6, 2012. 

That week the Cannery Mail had 1500# of Mail, basically Bulk Parcels of Canned Salmon that the 

employees 

were sending home, at FULL Priority Postage, as well as the normal First Class, that included Final Bill 

Payments from the Cannery as well as Final Checks, to fisherman. When informed that there was NO 

SERVICE 

that Wed, we were stuck, with 1500# ofMail, that was time sensitive, until the following Monday. When 

we called in to Wings, they were less than Helpful, and could only offer to Charter a Plane out for the 

original1500#, which was growing as people were leaving, by another 500# by that Friday. I was told by 

their Regional Manager, that they had fulfilled their "Contract" and that was it. This is NOT the Accepted 

SERVICE, that has been provided, by ANY previous Carrier, on the Contract. They have ALWAYS switched 

to 

Winter Schedule, AFTER the Cannery had "Closed for the Winter". This issue shows the lack of SERVICE, 

extended 

by Wings of Alaska, and lack of communications about their Schedule Changes. The Cannery expressed that 

they 

needed to move this Mail in a timely manner, but if they had to Charter, to do so, "They would NOT be paying 

Wings of Alaska, a Single DIME, to do so. The Cannery then arranged with Air Excursions, to come pick up 

that 

1500# of mail, that Thursday, at their expense. Air Excursions also showed in their filing, that they would be 

flexible in Schedule changes, as needed by the Cannery, if they were awarded the EAS Contract. 

We, the Residents, are very satisfied with they way things are, NOW, and hope that Wings of Alaska's \ 

Request for Reconsideration, is denied. 

1 
Bruce (semiretired powderman & exFCC Field Inspector for Southeastern Alaska) 

Bruce Gordon* Debora Gordon R.N. 

P.O. Box EXI 

Juneau, Alaska 99850 

AL7AQ * KL7WJ 

Bruce's Trading Post 

Excursion Inlet South 

Excursion Inlet, Alaska 99850 

www.btpost.net www.99850.net 

2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

|   |                      |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                      |
|   | /s/ Thomas H. Holcom, Jr. |
|   | Thomas H. Holcom, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

April 1, 2008
MEPC 59/INF.17 

I:\MEPC\59\INF-17.doc 

ANNEX 

TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF THE OceanSaverÆ BWMS 
MEPC 59/INF.17 

ANNEX 

Page 2 

I:\MEPC\59\INF-17.doc 
MEPC 59/INF.17 

ANNEX 

Page 3 

I:\MEPC\59\INF-17.doc 
MEPC 59/INF.17 

ANNEX 

Page 4 

I:\MEPC\59\INF-17.doc 
MEPC 59/INF.17 

ANNEX 

Page 5 

I:\MEPC\59\INF-17.doc 

___________
### §154704. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(b) Nondiscrimination.—The terms of membership may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, age, or national origin.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1438.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154704(a) | 36:4005. | Apr. 6, 1988, Pub. L. 100–281, §§5, 8 (related to membership), 102 Stat. 73, 74. |
| 154704(b) | 36:4008 (related to membership). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "Except as provided in this chapter" are substituted for "Except as provided in section 4008 of this title" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (b), the words "The terms of membership" are substituted for "In establishing the conditions of membership in the corporation" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
#### § 842.504 Amount of annuity supplement.

(a) Subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an annuity supplement is an amount equal to the old-age insurance benefit payable under title II of the Social Security Act, multiplied by a fraction—

(1) The numerator of which is the annuitant's total service creditable under FERS, excluding military service not performed during an absence of leave without pay from civilian service, rounded to the nearest whole number of years not exceeding 40 years; and

(2) The denominator of which is 40.

(b)

(1) The benefit referred to in paragraph (a) of this section is computed—

(i) As if the annuitant were age 62 and fully insured on January 1 of the year the annuity supplement commences;

(ii) Without regard to the Social Security earnings test (section 203 of the Social Security Act);

(iii) Without regard to the Social Security windfall elimination provisions (sections 215(a)(7) and 215(d)(5) of the Social Security Act); and

(iv) Using the actuarial reduction (section 202(q) of the Social Security Act) prescribed in the following table:

| Year of Birth | Reduction (percent) |
| --- | --- |
| 1937 and before | 20 |
| 1938 | 205/6 |
| 1939 | 212/3 |
| 1940 | 221/2 |
| 1941 | 231/3 |
| 1942 | 241/6 |
| 1943-54 | 25 |
| 1955 | 255/6 |
| 1956 | 262/3 |
| 1957 | 271/2 |
| 1958 | 281/3 |
| 1959 | 291/6 |
| 1960 and later | 30 |

(2) In computing the primary insurance amount—

(i) The number of elapsed years used to compute the number of benefit computation years does not include the years beginning with the year in which the annuity supplement commences;

(ii) For an employee or Member who retires under §§ 842.205, 842.206, 842.209, or 842.211 before reaching the minimum retirement age, wages in calendar years beginning after the date of separation on which the retirement is based, are deemed to be zero.

(iii) Only basic pay for full calendar years of service creditable under FERS is taken into account in computing the retiree's wages for a benefit computation year;

(iv) For a benefit computation year after age 21 during which the retiree did not perform a full calendar year of service creditable under FERS the retiree's wages are deemed to equal the product of—

(A) The National Average Wage Index (as determined by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) corresponding to that year, multiplied by

(B) A fraction—

(*1*) The numerator of which is the retiree's basic pay for his or her first full year of service creditable under FERS; and

(*2*) The denominator of which is the National Average Wage Index (as determined by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) corresponding to the retiree's first full year of service creditable under FERS.

[52 FR 4479, Feb. 11, 1987, as amended at 69 FR 69806, Dec. 1, 2004]
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1898.

#### Dow *& a. v.*The Electric Co.

High-water mark on a fresh-water river is the line which the river impresses . upon the soil by covering it for sufficient periods to deprive it of vegetation and to destroy its value for agriculture. .

. Petition, under the flowage act, for the assessment of damages. The plaintiffs’ land was bounded by the Piscataquog river at “ high-water mark.” The Piscataquog is a fresh-water river. The court instructed the jury that the words “ high-water mark ” meant that line on the river bank where vegetation ceased, and that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover damages to their land by flowage to that line. The defendants excepted.

*Burnham, Brown ft Warren,*for the plaintiffs.

*Sulloway ft Topliff*and *David A. Taggart,*for the defendants.

Wallace, J.

The high-water mark on fresh-water rivers is not the highest point to which the stream rises in times of freshets, but is “ the line which the river impresses upon the soil by covering it for sufficient periods to deprive it of vegetation and to destroy its value for- agriculture.” Gould Wat., *s. 45; Howard*v. *Ingersoll,*13 How. 381; *In re Minnetonka Lake,*56 Minn. 513; *Houghton v. Railroad, 47 Ia. 370.*The instructions to the jury were in accordance with this principle. ,

*Exception overruled.*

*'*Pike, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### **CHAPTER 30—INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA**

Sec.
1601.
Definitions.
1602.
International Regulations.
1603.
Vessels subject to International Regulations.
1604.
Vessels not subject to International Regulations.
1605.
Navy and Coast Guard vessels of special construction or purpose.
1606.
Special rules for ships of war, vessels proceeding under convoy, and fishing vessels engaged in fishing as a fleet.
1607.
Implementation by rules and regulations; authority to promulgate.
1608.
Civil penalties.
NRC ISSUES ADVANCED REACTOR DESIGN POLICY

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published the latest update to its policy 

statement on advanced nuclear power plant designs. 

 The policy provides expectations and guidance on safety, security and preparednessrelated issues so, as a matter of prudence, designers can address them early in the development of 

advanced reactors. The policy encourages the earliest possible interactions between the NRC and 

reactor vendors, potential applicants, the public, and other government agencies. 

 The Commission believes designers should consider several reactor characteristics, 

including: 

• Highly reliable, less complex safe shutdown systems, particularly ones with inherent or 

passive safety features; 

• Simplified safety systems that allow more straightforward engineering analysis, operate 

with fewer operator actions and increase operator comprehension of reactor conditions; 

• Concurrent consideration of safety and security requirements while designing a facility, 

resulting in an overall security system that requires fewer human actions; 

• Features that prevent a simultaneous breach of containment and loss of core cooling from 

an aircraft impact, or that inherently delay any radiological release, and; 

• Features that maintain spent fuel pool integrity following an aircraft impact. 

 The policy will be available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/commission/policy/. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-189 October 14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Global Plus 5

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add the Global Plus 5 product to the 
Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of notice: December 27, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle R. Coppin, 202-268-2368.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on December 19, 
2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the 
United States Postal Service to add Global Plus 5 to the Competitive 
Products List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2019-59 and CP2019-63.

Christopher C. Meyerson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-28026 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
December
      21, 2006











David
      Bock, CFO


I-Trax,
      Inc.


40
      Burton
      Hills Blvd STE 200


Nashville,
      TN 37215








Dear
      Mr.
      Bock:





Bank
      of
      America, N.A. has extended the maturity date of your $14,000,000.00 Line of
      Credit evidenced by the Promissory Note dated March 31, 2005 (including any
      previous amendments, the “Note”). The date on which the final principal and
      interest payment is due is now January 1, 2008.





This
      extension shall not constitute a commitment to extend the maturity of the Note
      beyond the date specified above. All other terms and conditions of the Note
      shall remain in full force and effect.





I
      also
      want to take this opportunity to thank you for your business. I believe we
      can
      continue to provide your company with the same high level of customer service
      and expertise.





If
      you
      have any questions, please contact your Client Manager, Kirk Porter at 615.749.3137 .





Bank
      of
      America, N.A.











By: /s/
      Jennifer Vescera


Jennifer
      Vescera, Officer