alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
r

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Jan 25, 2007 14:13

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

LTR-07-0047

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 01/24/2007

EDO

Mark Sanford c . DEDMRS

DEDR

SC-GOV DEDIA

AO

Dale Klein

Naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials defined as byproduct material

Appropriate

RF

01/16/2007

No

Made publicly available in ADAMS

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
6tate of 6outb Carolina

Office of the 0obernor

MARK SANFORD POST OFFICE Box 12267

GOVERNOR COLUMBIA 29211

January 16, 2007

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D.

Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Klein,

The •ph0rposezof this- letteris to comply with-the pro.visions of.Sectiont 65;1(e)-of the.:Energy!Policy

Act of :2005, .regarding.thet licensing; of certain iiatdr~ally occurring and, accelerator produced!.-.

radioactive materials',ntow.defined as byprqduct material- in; Section:'11e. (3); and ItI e(4).of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

In 1969, the State of South Carolina entered into an Agreement with' the Commission under

Section 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that Agreement, the State

licenses byproduct material as defined in Section 1 le.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition,

the State licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now

defined as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the

program for licensing 1 le.(1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the

licensing program that would impact the previous Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation

Program (IMPEP) finding of.adequacy. Further, we intend to continueto license,.the new..

byproduct material under this same program.

Accordingly,! I -certify to- the,.Conmiissidn.thatthe State:of.South Carqlina has -a program for,

licensingbyprdductn material, as' defined in; paragraph, (3)2'.or" (4). of Section l1 1 e. rof the Atomic

Energy.. Act of4-.954, as amended,-that is. adequate, to. protect,the public'health and, safety;.'-and' that

the State intends to continue to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the
Page 2

Dr. Klein

January 16, 2007

byproduct material. This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan

for the Transition of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct

Material."

Thank you and take care.

Sincerely,

Mark Sanford

MS/kl.kh
From: Mohan Nagavedu [mailto:mnagavedu@aqmd.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 7:31 PM 

To: Adams, Lucy H. 

Cc: Mulrine.Phil@epamail.epa.gov; Mohan Nagavedu 

Subject: Newer Chrome Source Test Reports 

Lucy / Phil

Here are some newer source test reports for chrome testing at the facilities which were on the original

list. There were not as many as we originally thought because of duplicates from the original list. Three

of them were considered “unacceptable,” including the one which was invalidated due to some

apparent revisions to field data sheet information (STID 10004).

STID COMPANY Comments 

08104 Accu Crome Plating Co. 

09048 Rebilt Metalizing Co. 

This report was evaluated as "Unacceptable." See the 

included evaluation for specific details. 

09064 Sigma Plating Co., Inc. 

09066 Multichrome Company, Inc. 

09069 Triumph Processing, Inc. 

09079 Chrome Tech 

09080 

Hightower Plating and 

Manufacturing Co. 

09096 Sigma Plating Co., Inc. 

This report was evaluated as "Unacceptable." See the 

included evaluation for specific details. 

10004 Markland Manufacturing Inc. 

This report was evaluated as "Unacceptable." See the 

included evaluation for specific details. 

===========================================

P. Eric Padilla

Air Quality Engineer

SCAQMD, Source Test Engineering 

21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765

(909)396-2265

(909)396-2099 Fax

epadilla@aqmd.gov

===========================================
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Adherex Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
(the Report), each of the undersigned, William P. Peters, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James A. Klein, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                     
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |     |  |                                     
|                   |  |    
|                   |  | By: |  | /s/ William P. Peters               
|                   |  |     |  | William P. Peters                   
|                   |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |     |  |                                     
|                   |  |    
|                   |  | By: |  | /s/ James A. Klein, Jr.             
|                   |  |     |  | James A. Klein, Jr.                 
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 536.207 Loss of eligibility for grade retention. ( a ) Eligibility for grade retention as a result of an entitlement under § 536.201 ceases if any of the following conditions occurs at any time after the employee receives written notice of the reduction in grade, but before the commencement of the 2-year period of grade retention: ( 1 ) The employee has a break in service of 1 workday or more;
( 2 ) The employee is reduced in grade for personal cause or at the employee's request (based on the actual grade of the employee's position rather than the employee's retained grade and, when a movement to a different covered pay system is involved, a comparison of comparison rates under § 536.105);
( 3 ) The employee moves to a position under a covered pay system with a grade that is equal to or higher than the retained grade (as determined under § 536.105), excluding a temporary promotion;
( 4 ) The employee declines a reasonable offer of a position with a grade equal to or higher than the retained grade (as determined under §§ 536.104 and 536.105);
( 5 ) The employee elects in writing to terminate the benefits of grade retention; or
( 6 ) The employee moves to a position not under a covered pay system.
( b ) Eligibility for grade retention as a result of entitlement under § 536.202 ceases if any of the following conditions occurs at any time after management informs the employee of an impending reorganization or reclassification that will or could result in a reduction in grade, but before the commencement of the 2-year period of grade retention: ( 1 ) Any of the conditions listed in paragraph (a) of this section except that an employee's request for placement in a lower-graded position, in lieu of displacing another employee at his or her grade under reduction in force procedures, is not a declination of a reasonable offer for grade retention purposes; or
( 2 ) The employee fails to enroll in, or to comply with reasonable written requirements established to assure full consideration under, a program providing priority consideration for placement.
( c ) If an employee loses eligibility for grade retention under this section, the employee's rate of basic pay must be set in accordance with the pay-setting rules and pay rates applicable to the employee's position of record (e.g., 5 CFR part 531, subpart B, for GS positions). An employee is not eligible for pay retention under subpart C of this part based on an action that provided eligibility for grade retention if the employee elects to terminate eligibility for grade retention under paragraph (a)(5) or (b) of this section.
[70 FR 31305, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 66155, Nov. 7, 2008]
Exhibit 31.2

I, Paul Chung, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respect the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report. 

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
### §140407. Tax-exempt status required as condition of charter

If the corporation fails to maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the charter granted under this chapter shall terminate.

(Added Pub. L. 111–95, §1(a), Nov. 6, 2009, 123 Stat. 3003.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in text, is classified generally to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Diagnostic Corporation of America (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, SAM WINER, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 18, 2006 |  | /s/ Sam Winer                                                                                     
|                      |  | Sam Winer                                                                                         
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors
NRC SEEKS PUBLIC COMMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION 

OF REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking comment from members of the 

public on the implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP), which the agency 

put in place seven years ago to revamp and improve its inspection and enforcement 

programs for commercial nuclear power plants. Each year the NRC seeks feedback to 

help the agency continue to improve its regulatory approach. 

 In particular, the NRC would appreciate the public’s answers to a list of 26 

questions relating to the ROP, including the following: 

-- Does the Inspection Program adequately cover areas important to safety? 

-- Is the information in NRC inspection reports useful to you? 

-- Is the ROP understandable, and are the processes, procedures and products clear 

 and written in plain English? 

-- Has the public had sufficient opportunity to participate in the ROP and provide 

 input and comments? 

 All 26 questions are contained in the Federal Register notice, which should be 

published shortly. The notice is available on the NRC’s Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/rop2007survey.pdf . 

 The comment period runs until Dec. 7. Comments may be e-mailed to 

nrcrep@nrc.gov or mailed to Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Office of 

Administration, Mail Stop T-6D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

D.C., 20555-0001. Comments can also be delivered to Two White Flint North, 11545 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-133 October 9, 2007
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.3

Central Indiana Railway Company C/O Conrail 

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 2303
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                                                                    ------------

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No's. 333-48346, 333-34970, 333-37868 and 333-37870) of
Pure Resources, Inc., formerly referred to as Union Oil's Permian Basin business
unit, of our report dated March 10, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial
statements which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
March  18, 2002
# L_2015202EN.01005601.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/56

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 202/2014

of 25 September 2014

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2015/1270]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Council Recommendation 2012/C 398/01 of 20 December 2012 on the validation of non-formal and informal learning (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Council Recommendation 2012/C 398/01 of 20 December 2012 on the validation of non-formal and informal learning (1).

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in paragraph 8 of Article 4 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32012 H 1222(01): Council Recommendation 2012/C 398/01 of 20 December 2012 on the validation of non-formal and informal learning (OJ C 398, 22.12.2012, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32012 H 1222(01): Council Recommendation 2012/C 398/01 of 20 December 2012 on the validation of non-formal and informal learning (OJ C 398, 22.12.2012, p. 1).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ C 398, 22.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# L_2017308EN.01004001.xml

| 23.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 133/2016

of 3 June 2016

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2017/2151]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the European Union regarding the implementation and development of the single market for financial services. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the European Union regarding the implementation and development of the single market for financial services.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2016, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 7 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | In paragraphs 3 and 4, the words ‘paragraphs 5 to [11]’ are replaced by the words ‘this Article’. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In paragraphs 3 and 4, the words ‘paragraphs 5 to [11]’ are replaced by the words ‘this Article’.

| 2. | The following paragraph is added:






  ‘12. | The EFTA States shall, as from 1 January 2016, participate in the Union actions related to the following budget line, entered into the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016:






  — | Budget line 12 02 01: ‘Implementation and development of the single market for financial services’.’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.

The following paragraph is added:

‘12.

—

Budget line 12 02 01: ‘Implementation and development of the single market for financial services’.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2016.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Magic Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: June 15, 2004

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                              |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                       |
| Gordon Scott Venters        Principal Executive Officer and        Acting Principal Financial Officer |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hechinger Liquidation Trust on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Conrad F. Hocking,
the Liquidation Trustee of the Liquidation Trust, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Liquidation Trust.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 13, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/  Conrad F. Hocking
Conrad F. Hocking
Liquidation Trustee