alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL19-16-000]

                    On December 20, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL19-16-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether the transmission formula rate of Michigan Electric Transmission Company, LLC may be unjust, unreasonable, or unduly discriminatory or preferential.                     *Int'l Transmission Co., et al.,*                     165 FERC 61,236 (2018).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL19-16-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL19-16-000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 days of the date of issuance of the order.

Dated: December 20, 2018.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-28253 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.221 How does OPM compute the consumer expenditure weights it uses to combine price indexes? OPM uses the following ten-step process to compute consumer expenditure weights: ( a ) *Step 1.* OPM obtains the latest BLS tabulated CES data nationwide and for the Washington, DC, area.
( b ) *Step 2.* In both the nationwide and DC area tabulated data, OPM replaces the homeowners' expenditures for shelter with estimated rental values of owned homes that are available elsewhere in tabulated CES data. Note: These replacements are consistent with the rental equivalence approach described in § 591.219.
( c ) *Step 3.* OPM selects the central income groups in the nationwide CES tabulation.
( d ) *Step 4.* OPM calculates the expenditure shares (*i.e.,* percentages) for each central income group by dividing each of its DEC expenditures by total expenditures for the income group. OPM also calculates expenditure shares for total nationwide expenditures by dividing each nationwide DEC expenditure by total nationwide expenditures.
( e ) *Step 5.* OPM computes a democratic distribution of expenditure shares by averaging the central income groups' shares at each DEC and higher level of aggregation.
( f ) *Step 6.* OPM computes a set of ratios by dividing each expenditure share of the nationwide democratic distribution by the corresponding expenditure share of the total national distribution.
( g ) *Step 7.* OPM computes estimated expenditures for Washington DC for each DC DEC and higher level of aggregation that BLS reported by multiplying the reported expenditure by the corresponding ratio derived in Step 6.
( h ) *Step 8.* For each DC DEC and higher level of aggregation that BLS did not report, OPM computes expenditures for DC by distributing the DC expenditure calculated in step 7 using the distribution of expenditure shares derived in step 5.
( i ) *Step 9.* As described in § 591.211(c), OPM classifies each DEC and aggregate into PEGs.
( j ) *Step 10.* OPM computes expenditure weights by dividing each DEC or aggregate by the total expenditure derived from the DC expenditure computed in step 8. Therefore, the sum of the MEGs, PEGs, and DECs, will separately total 100, *i.e.,* so that all consumer expenditures in the original tabulation are accounted for.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM EDWARD SHAW,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 73 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

99–011 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–131

REPORT ON MILITARY ACTIONS TAKEN TO RESPOND

TO THE THREAT OF TERRORISM

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

A REPORT, CONSISTENT WITH THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION

AND PUBLIC LAW 107–40, TO HELP ENSURE THAT THE CONGRESS IS KEPT INFORMED ON MILITARY ACTIONS TAKEN TO

RESPOND TO THE THREAT OF TERRORISM

OCTOBER 9, 2001.—Referred to the Committee on International Relations

and ordered to be printed

(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, October 9, 2001.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, Speaker of the House of Representatives,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: At approximately 12:30 p.m. (EDT) on October 7, 2001, on my orders, U.S. Armed Forces began combat action

in Afghanistan against Al Qaida terrorists and their Taliban supporters. This military action is a part of our campaign against terrorism and is designed to disrupt the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations.

We are responding to the brutal September 11 attacks on our

territory, our citizens, and our way of life, and to the continuing

threat of terrorist acts against the United States and our friends

and allies. This follows the deployment of various combat-equipped

and combat support forces to a number of locations in the Central

and Pacific Command areas of operations, as I reported to the Congress on September 24, to prepare for the campaign to prevent and

deter terrorism.

I have taken these actions pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations as Commander in Chief and

Chief Executive. It is not possible to know at this time either the

duration of combat operations or the scope and duration of the deployment of U.S. Armed Forces necessary to counter the terrorist

threat to the United States. As I have stated previously, it is likely

that the American campaign against terrorism will be lengthy. I

will direct such additional measures as necessary in exercise of our

right to self-defense and to protect U.S. citizens and interests.

I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution and

Public Law 107–40. Officials of my Administration and I have been

communicating regularly with the leadership and other members of

Congress, and we will continue to do so. I appreciate the continuing

support of the Congress, including its enactment of Public Law

107–40, in these actions to protect the security of the United States

of America and its citizens, civilian and military, here and abroad.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH.

Æ
# L_2018305EN.01001801.xml

| 29.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 53/2017

of 17 March 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1817]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1936 of 4 November 2016 approving calcium oxide (burnt lime) as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 3 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1936 of 4 November 2016 approving calcium oxide (burnt lime) as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 3 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzzzg (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1950) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzzzh. | 32016 R 1936: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1936 of 4 November 2016 approving calcium oxide (burnt lime) as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 3 (OJ L 299, 5.11.2016, p. 48).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzzzh.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1936 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 18 March 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 5.11.2016, p. 48.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 550.712 Reemployment; recredit of service. ( a ) When a former employee is reemployed, the employing agency shall record on the appointment document the number of weeks of severance pay received (including partial weeks).
( b ) If an employee again becomes entitled to severance pay, the agency in which entitlement arises shall recompute the severance pay allowance on the basis of all creditable service and current age and deduct from the number of weeks it would take to exhaust the allowance the number of weeks for which severance pay previously was received.
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov

Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Peter 

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ 

Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 03/23/2012 02:32 PM

Subject: GHG NSPS RIA

Attached below is both a clean and redline version of the RIA. The executive summary, chapter 1, and 

chapter 4 have no additional changes in them since the last version you reviewed. . I have also included 

redline versions of chapters 2, 3, 5, and 6. Those include the following changes, which are either minor 

corrections or edits to align with the preamble:

Chapter 2: Revised language discussing reconstructed sources to match the preamble edits delivered to 

OMB on 4/13.

Chapter 3: Corrected USGCRP, per their request on call last Friday.

Chapter 5: Revised language on reconstructed sources to match preamble, corrected a few errors found 

after the 4/13 version, and fixed two typos in table 5-8.

Chapter 6: Revised Paperwork Reduction Act language and description of projected generation to match 

preamble.

Clean RIA:

0 EGU GHG NSPS Exec Summary 0323 clean.docx

 

1 EGU GHG NSPS Introduction 0323 clean.docx

 

2 EGU GHG NSPS Control Strategies 0323 clean.docx

 

3 EGU GHG NSPS Defining Climate Change Problem 0323 clean.docx

 

4 EGU GHG NSPS Electric Power Sector Profile 0323 clean.docx

 

5 EGU GHG NSPS Costs Benefits 0323 clean.docx

 

6 EGU GHG NSPS Executive Order 0323 clean.docx 
Redline:

2 EGU GHG NSPS Control Strategies 0323 redline.docx 

3 EGU GHG NSPS Defining Climate Change Problem 0323 redline.docx

 

5 EGU GHG NSPS Costs Benefits 0323 redline.docx

 

6 EGU GHG NSPS Executive Order 0323 redline.docx
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 199

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 2 percent 

excise tax on the net investment income of tax-exempt foundations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. CRANE, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BURR, Mr. 

FORBES, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mrs. JOHNSON of 

Connecticut, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. LEACH, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. 

OTTER, Mr. PAUL, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. 

SCHROCK, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SIMMONS, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the 2 percent excise tax on the net investment income 

of tax-exempt foundations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON NET INVESTMENT 

4 INCOME OF TAX-EXEMPT FOUNDATIONS. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Subsection (a) of section 4940 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to excise tax 

7 based on investment income) is repealed. 
2

•HR 199 IH 

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) Section 4940 of such Code is amended—

3 (A) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), 

4 and (d) as subsections (a), (b), and (c), respec5 tively, 

6 (B) by striking subsection (e), and 

7 (C) in subsection (a), as redesignated by 

8 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘(A) the tax im9 posed under subsection (a) (computed as if such 

10 subsection applied to such private foundation 

11 for the taxable year),’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) an 

12 amount equal to 2 percent of the net invest13 ment income of such foundation for the taxable 

14 year,’’. 

15 (2) Section 4942(f)(3)(A) of such Code is 

16 amended by striking ‘‘section 4940(c)(3)(B)’’ and 

17 inserting ‘‘section 4940(b)(3)(B)’’. 

18 (3) Section 4945(d)(4)(A) of such Code is 

19 amended by striking ‘‘section 4940(d)(2)’’ and in20 serting ‘‘section 4940(c)(2)’’. 

21 (4) Section 4948(a) of such Code is amended 

22 by striking ‘‘section 4940(c)(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘sec23 tion 4940(b)(2)’’. 
3

•HR 199 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2003.

Æ
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1996

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the exemption 

from the minimum wage and overtime compensation requirements of 

that Act for certain computer professionals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself and Mr. ANDREWS) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify 

the exemption from the minimum wage and overtime 

compensation requirements of that Act for certain computer professionals, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS. 

4 Paragraph (17) of section 13(a) of the Fair Labor 

5 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(17)) is amended 

6 to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(17)(A) any employee who is a computer sys8 tems, network, or database analyst, designer, devel-
2

•HR 1996 IH 

1 oper, programmer, software engineer, or other simi2 larly skilled worker—

3 ‘‘(i) whose primary duty is—

4 ‘‘(I) the application of systems or net5 work or database analysis techniques and 

6 procedures, including consulting with 

7 users, to determine hardware, software, 

8 systems, network, or database specifica9 tions (including functional specifications); 

10 ‘‘(II) the design, configuration, devel11 opment, integration, documentation, anal12 ysis, creation, testing, securing, or modi13 fication of, or problem resolution for, com14 puter systems, networks, databases, or pro15 grams, including prototypes, based on and 

16 related to user, system, network, or data17 base specifications, including design speci18 fications and machine operating systems; 

19 ‘‘(III) the management or training of 

20 employees performing duties described in 

21 subclause (I) or (II); or 

22 ‘‘(IV) a combination of duties de23 scribed in subclauses (I), (II), or (III) the 

24 performance of which requires the same 

25 level of skills; and 
3

•HR 1996 IH 

1 ‘‘(ii) who, in the case of an employee who 

2 is compensated on an hourly basis, is com3 pensated at a rate of not less than $27.63 an 

4 hour. 

5 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘network’ in6 cludes the Internet and Intranet networks and the 

7 world wide web. 

8 ‘‘(C) For the purposes of this Act, an employee 

9 who meets the exemption provided by this paragraph 

10 shall be considered an employee in a professional ca11 pacity under paragraph (1).’’.

Æ
### §20701. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "State" includes the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1288.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20701 | 36:1913. | June 1, 1982, Pub. L. 97–192, §14, 96 Stat. 111. |

Section

The words "the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico" are omitted as included in "the territories and possessions of the United States".
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.17

Pullman Railroad Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4345
B.C.D. 03-68

SEP 1 0 2003

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION 

Mississippi & Tennessee RailNet, Inc. (MTRI)

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the continuing status of Mississippi & Tennessee

RailNet, Inc. (MTRI) (B.A. No. 5570) as an employer under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et sea.) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et sea.)

(RUIA). MTRI has been an employer under the RRA and RUIA,

with service creditable from June 23, 1998.

Information regarding MTRI was furnished by Mr. William E.

Glavin, Executive Vice President of North American RailNet.

Information provided by Mr. Glavin shows that MTRI owned and

operated approximately 87.7 miles of railroad extending between

milepost GG 281.0 at Houston, in Chickasaw, Pontotoc, Union and

Tippah Counties, Mississippi, and milepost GG 368.7 at Middleton

in Hardeman County, Tennessee. According to Mr. Glavin, MTRI 

ceased operations on May 30, 2003. Mr. Glavin stated that the

assets of MTRI, including the rail line, were sold to Mississippi

Tennessee Holdings, L.L.C. on May 30, 2003. Authority for this

transaction was obtained in Surface Transportation Board (STB)

Finance Docket No. 34355, decided June 5, 2003. Employees were

last compensated on June 30, 2003.

Section 202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that-'

The employer status of any company or person

shall terminate whenever such company or person

loses any of the characteristics essential to the

existence of an employer status. (20 CFR 202.11.)

BA#5570
-2-

Mississippi & Tennessee RailNet, Inc. (MTRI)

The record in this case indicates that MTRI lost the

characteristics essential to the existence of its employer status

and ceased being a covered rail carrier employer effective June 30,

2003, the date on which MTRI last compensated its employees.

Michael S. Schwartz

tpi..

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
§ 848.301 Ending phased retirement status to return to regular employment status. ( a ) *Election to end phased retirement status to return to regular employment status.* ( 1 ) A phased retiree may elect, with the permission of an authorized agency official, to end phased employment at any time to return to regular employment status. The election is deemed to meet the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 8412a(g) regardless of the employee's work schedule. The employee is not subject to any working percentage limitation (i.e., full-time, 50 percent of full-time, or any other working percentage) upon electing to end phased retirement status.
( 2 ) To elect to end phased retirement status to return to regular employment status, a phased retiree must— ( i ) Submit to an authorized agency official, on a form prescribed by OPM, a written and signed request to end phased retirement status to return to regular employment status; and
( ii ) Obtain the signed written approval of an authorized agency official for the request.
( 3 ) An employee may cancel an approved election to end phased retirement status to return to regular employment status by submitting a signed written request to the agency and obtaining the approval of an authorized agency official before the effective date of return to regular employment status.
( 4 ) The employing agency must notify OPM that the employee's phased retirement status has ended by submitting to OPM a copy of the completed election to end phased retirement status to return to regular employment status within 15 days of its approval.
( b ) *Mandated return to regular employment status.* A phased retiree may be returned to regular employment status as provided under § 848.205(j)(6).
( c ) *Bar on reelection of phased retirement.* Once an election to end phased retirement status to return to regular employment status is effective, the employee may not reelect phased retirement status.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 210

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate the individual 

income tax rate cuts made by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 

Reconciliation Act of 2001 and to make permanent all tax cuts made 

by that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. TIBERI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to accelerate 

the individual income tax rate cuts made by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 

and to make permanent all tax cuts made by that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX 

4 RATE CUTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The table contained in paragraph 

6 (2) of section 1(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

7 (relating to reductions in rates after June 30, 2001) is 

8 amended to read as follows:
2

•HR 210 IH 

‘‘In the case of taxable years

beginning during calendar year: 

The corresponding percentages 

shall be substituted for

the following percentages: 

28% 31% 36% 39.6%

2001 .......................................................................... 27.5% 30.5% 35.5% 39.1%

2002 .......................................................................... 27.0% 30.0% 35.0% 38.6%

2003 and thereafter .................................................. 25.0% 28.0% 33.0% 35.0%’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2002. 

4 SEC. 2. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TAX RELIEF RECONCILI5 ATION ACT OF 2001 MADE PERMANENT. 

6 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec7 onciliation Act of 2001 (relating to compliance with Con8 gressional Budget Act) is hereby repealed.

Æ