alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-005 January 11, 2007

Contact: Diane Screnci 610-337-5330

 Neil Sheehan 610-337-5331 

 

 NRC TO REVIEW ENTERGY REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE 

FOR MEETING ENERGY POLICY ACT REQUIREMENTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has received Entergy's request for an extension of

the Jan. 30, 2007, deadline imposed by the NRC to meet requirements of the 2005 Energy Policy Act at

its Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, N.Y. Agency staff will evaluate the request and provide a

decision as rapidly as possible.

The Energy Policy Act included a provision directing the NRC to require nuclear power plants

located within certain population densities to have back-up power for their emergency notification

systems, including sirens. Indian Point is the only nuclear plant that fell within the requirement. 

In January 2006, the NRC issued a confirmatory Order requiring Entergy to install back-up

power for its entire alert and notification system. The Order required completion by Jan. 30, 2007. The

NRC Order allows Entergy to request relaxation of specific aspects of the Order.

In its extension request, Entergy states that “considerable progress” has been made toward

completing the new siren system. However, Entergy indicated that one tower is unable to support the

addition of the necessary antennae and will need modifications to support the new equipment. Entergy

also stated that additional testing of the system and training of emergency service workers will be

needed once work is completed on the final tower. In addition, Entergy said the need to obtain

additional local permits for the new-siren locations also contributed to the delay. Entergy said these

issues will prevent the work from being completed by the Order’s deadline. Entergy has asked for an

extension until April 15, 2007. Entergy noted in the extension request that they had discussed the

request with surrounding counties.

Indian Point’s existing alert and notification system is unaffected by the new system and

remains in place to notify the public, if necessary. 

"We will carefully evaluate this request to ensure that Entergy has taken reasonable steps to

complete installation and has provided good cause for any relaxation of the Order," said Jim Dyer,

Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
The Entergy extension request is posted on this page: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/indian-point-issues.html . 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: FROM: TO: • Review ofKlamath Falls Nonattainment Area Emission Inventory Robert Kotchenruther, OEA

# ~~ Justin Spenillo, APU OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL

ASSESSMENT 

## NOV 19 2014

I have reviewed the 2008 base-year emissions inventory prepared for the Klamath Falls PM2

.s nonattainment area that was submitted on December 12, 2012 as part of the Klamath Falls Attainment Plan SIP submission package. My involvement included multiple reviews ofthe inventory as it was developed by the Oregon Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ODEQ) in 2011 and 2012. Based on my reviews, I believe this emissions inventory satisfies the requirements of40 CFR 51.1008 and was developed in accordance with the August 2005 EPA guidance, 

### "Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implementation of Ozone and Particulate Matter NAAQS and Regional Haze Regulations. " The 2009 designation ofKlamath Falls as a nonattainment area relied on air quality data from 2006 to 2008, and ODEQ appropriately selected 2008 as a base-year for the inventory. 200R was al so a year for which DEQ compiled extensive emissions data for the National Emissions Inventory. The ODEQ 's 2008 base-year emissions inventory includes emissions of direct PM2.s and the precursors to the formation ofPM2.s which are nitro gen oxides (NOx); volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ammonia (NH3), and sulfur dioxide (S02). The emissions inventory appropriately addre ssed general source categories of sta tionary point sources, stationary nonpoint sources (area sources), non-road mobile sources, and on-road mobile sources. The main sources of emissions contributing to PM2.s in the Klamath Falls NAA are residential wood combustion with additional contribution from mobile sources, non-road sources, and industrial point sources. The emissions inventory considered, but did not include as separate so urce categories, three source categories with minimal emissions. The industrial open burning and commercial and institutional on-site incineration source category was determined to have insignificant associated emissions based on an analysis ofp ermitting and complaint records. Emissions from this source category are included as point source emissions for the major and minor sources that are required to have permits under Oregon 's Air Contaminant Discharge Permit (ACDP) rules. For the very small point sources that are not required to obtain an ACDP, a l etter permit would have been required to conduct industrial open burning and, according to DEQ , records show that no letter permits were issued in the base year . The residential solid waste incineration category was not included as a separate source category becau se these emissions are captured in the residential open burning source category. The orchard heaters and orchard prunings burning source category was not included because there are no orchards within the NAA due to its high elevation and cold temperatures and therefore no sources in this category.
No. I-08-043 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

July 7, 2008

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO INDIAN POINT 2 NUCLEAR PLANT 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region I 

office in King of Prussia have selected George J. Malone as the 

Senior Resident Inspector at the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant 

in Buchanan, N.Y. 

 Malone joins Resident Inspector Chris Hott at Indian Point 2. 

Two resident inspectors are also assigned to Indian Point 3. Both Indian Point units are 

operated by Entergy Nuclear. 

 Since Fall 2005, Malone has been the Senior Resident Inspector at Hope Creek in 

Hancock’s Bridge, N.J. and previously was the Resident Inspector at the adjacent Salem 

Nuclear Generating Station. He joined the NRC in March 2002 as an operations engineer 

in the Region I Division of Reactor Safety. Prior to joining the agency, he worked as an 

operations and training engineer at Bechtel-Bettis, Inc., in Charleston, S.C. Malone also 

held a senior reactor operator license at a research reactor. He has a master’s and a 

bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering from the University of Illinois. 

 “George Malone is an excellent addition to the inspection team at Indian Point. 

He has the experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC ensure that 

Indian Point 2 conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect public 

health and safety," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident 

inspectors. They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular 

inspections, monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and 

the public. Residents can serve for up to seven years at any one site. 

 The Indian Point residents can be reached at 914/739-9360. 

### 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.5(c)

12. NO REPRICING OF GRANTS OR AWARDS. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to
the contrary and subject to Section VII.7, the exercise price or base price, as
the case may be, of any grant or award hereunder shall not be reduced after the
date of such grant or award, and no grant or award hereunder shall be canceled
for the purpose of regranting a new grant or award at a lower exercise price or
base price, as the case may be, without shareholder approval given at a meeting
in which the reduction of such exercise price or base price, or the cancellation
and regranting of a grant or award, as the case may be, is considered for
approval.
### §190111. Liability for acts of officers and agents

The corporation is liable for the acts of its officers and agents acting within the scope of their authority.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1449.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190111 | 36:232. | June 30, 1950, ch. 431, §12, 64 Stat. 314. |

Section
# L_2020210EN.01002801.xml

| 2.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 61/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2020/815]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/470 of 21 March 2018 on detailed rules on the maximum residue limit to be considered for control purposes for foodstuffs derived from animals which have been treated in the EU under Article 11 of Directive 2001/82/EC (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/470 of 21 March 2018 on detailed rules on the maximum residue limit to be considered for control purposes for foodstuffs derived from animals which have been treated in the EU under Article 11 of Directive 2001/82/EC (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12c (Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/782) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12d. | 32018 R 0470: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/470 of 21 March 2018 on detailed rules on the maximum residue limit to be considered for control purposes for foodstuffs derived from animals which have been treated in the EU under Article 11 of Directive 2001/82/EC (OJ L 79, 22.3.2018, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12d.

32018 R 0470: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/470 of 21 March 2018 on detailed rules on the maximum residue limit to be considered for control purposes for foodstuffs derived from animals which have been treated in the EU under Article 11 of Directive 2001/82/EC (OJ L 79, 22.3.2018, p. 16).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/470 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 79, 22.3.2018, p. 16.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# regon Department of Environmental Quality Headquarters 81.1 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, OR 97204-1390

(503) 229-5696 FAX (503) 229-6124

TTY: 711

Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Designation of SKATS Ozone Maintenance Area

Dear Mr. McLerran: The purpose of this letter is to advise the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that the Salem-Keizer Area Transportation Study (SKATS) is an ozone maintenance area under Oregon state law. SKATS was formerly in non-compliance with the one-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), and was designated as a non-attainment area by EPA. It subsequently met the requirements for compliance with the one-hour ozone NAAQS, but did not obtain redesignation as an attainment area before the 1997 eight-hour ozone NAAQS replaced the one-hour standard. Since that time, SKATS has remained in compliance with the eight-hour ozone NAAQS. The state of Oregon considers SKATS an ozone maintenance area under Oregon law. As a maintenance area, nonattainment-area New Source Rules of the State of Oregon do not apply to sources in this area. The state will continue all existing ozone strategies as submitted in the section 110(a)(1) maintenance plan and supporting rules for Portland and Salem, Oregon submitted on May 22, 2007. DEQ looks forward to EPA proceeding, under federal law, with its review and approval of the Oregon ozone maintenance plan as a revision to Oregon's State Implementation Plan. P_lease_feel_free_to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,

An rew Ginsburg, Ad inistrator Air Quality Division John A. Kitzhaber, MD, Governor

September 22, 2011
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-089 June 7, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE TO MEET 

JUNE 15-17 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste will hold a

public meeting June 15-17, in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, risk-informing Office of

Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards activities, and the committee’s draft white papers on high-level

radioactive waste transportation issues and low-level radioactive waste. The meeting will also include

the committee’s review of the latest International Commission on Radiation Protection Foundation

Documents, and its review of the Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses’ research program.

An ACNW working group will meet Wednesday, June 15, to discuss draft guidance being

prepared to implement the License Termination Rule. The meeting will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

The Thursday session will run from 10:15 a.m. to 5:40 p.m., and the session on Friday from 8:30 a.m.

to 12:00 noon. All sessions are open to the public and will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike.

Video teleconferencing is available for observing open sessions. Those interested in this

service should call Mr. Theron Brown at 301-415-8066 10 days before the meeting to assure

availability.

For more information on the meeting, contact Sharon Steele, at 301-415-6805. A complete

agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2005/ . 

# # #
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-036 March 20, 2006

 

NRC INVITES THE PUBLIC TO SUBMIT NOMINATIONS FOR THE 

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking qualified candidates for its Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), which provides the Commission with independent expert

advice on the safety of existing and proposed nuclear facilities, and the adequacy of proposed reactor

safety standards. The ACRS also provides advice related to the integration of safety and security at

commercial reactors.

At present, the committee is focusing on risk-informed and performance-based regulations;

license renewal applications; power uprates; and the use of mixed oxide and high burn-up fuels. The

committee is also increasing its emphasis on new reactor designs and technologies.

ACRS members are drawn from a variety of engineering and scientific disciplines, and serve a

four-year term with the possibility of reappointment for an additional two terms. At this time, the NRC

is seeking individuals with at least 10 years of experience in such areas as: thermal hydraulics,

materials and metallurgy, plant operations, severe accident analysis, probabilistic risk assessment,

design engineering, digital instrumentation and control, or nuclear analysis. Candidates should have a

demonstrated record of accomplishments in nuclear reactor safety; those with pertinent graduate-level

education will receive additional consideration. 

It is the NRC’s policy to select the best qualified applicant for the job, regardless of race,

gender, age, religion, or any other non-merit factor. Consistent with the requirements of the Federal

Advisory Committee Act, the NRC seeks candidates with varying views and diverse backgrounds so

that ACRS membership is balanced.

Conflict-of-interest regulations restrict the participation of members actively involved in

regulated aspects of the nuclear industry, so the degree and nature of any such involvement will be

weighed. Each qualified candidate’s financial interests must be reconciled with federal and NRC rules

and regulations prior to final appointment. This might require divestiture of securities issued by nuclear

industry entities, or the discontinuance of industry-funded research contracts or grants. A security

background investigation for a “Q” clearance (or the transfer of an up-to-date “Q” clearance) is also

required.
Candidates must be citizens of the United States and be able to devote from 80 to 100 days per

year to ACRS business. Applicants should send a resumé describing their educational and professional

background including any special accomplishments; professional references, current address and

telephone number should also be included. Resumés are being accepted on an ongoing basis

throughout 2006. They should be sent to: Sherry Meador, ACRS/ACNW, Mail Stop T2E-26, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 or by e-mail to sam@nrc.gov .

###
### §11221. Authority for program

The Secretary is authorized to make grants and to provide technical assistance to public and nonprofit private entities to establish and operate transitional living youth projects for homeless youth.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title III, §321, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7273(f), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4455; amended Pub. L. 106–71, §3(e), Oct. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1038.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5714–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 321 of Pub. L. 93–415 was renumbered section 363 and is classified to section 11275 of this title.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–71 struck out "Purpose and" before "Authority" in section catchline and struck out subsec. (a) designation before "The Secretary" and subsec. (b) which defined "homeless youth" and "transitional living youth project".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1988, see section 7296(a) of Pub. L. 100–690, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 11101 of this title.
From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

~~) ,._.,.,., 

~,; q_: !] -21 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:55 PM 

Draylon Gant (dgant@greenvillems.org); Joshua Abramson Q.abramson@flytupelo.com); 

Tom Williams (twilliams@meridianairport.com); Tom Heanue; Barry Griffith 

(barryg@flytheshoals.com); John Dupree (mayor@hattiesburgms.com); John H. Cox III 

Qohncox@greenvillems.org); mayor@rtconnect.net 

Tim Sieber; Dave Hackett (dhackett@gosunair.com); Wade Steel 

(wade.steel@skywest.com); Mickey Bowman (mickeybowman@msn.com); Beale, Scott 

(sbeale@flyadi.com); cstork@airchoiceone.com; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); 

michael.mooney@sixelconsulting.com; 'lauren@seaportair.com' 

UPDATE: One more EAS proposal at Mississippi 5 and Muscle Shoals- Comments due 

July 9 

Aerodynamics EAS bid -MEl, PIB, TUP- June 2014.pdf; Air Choice One EAS bid- MSL, 

GLH, TUP- June 2014.pdf; ExpressJet EAS bid MEl & PlB- June 2014.pdf; SeaPort EAS 

proposal - TUP, MSL, GLH -June 2014.docx.pdf; SunAir EAS bid - MSL, GLH, PlB, TUPJune 2014.pdf 

My apologies- there was an oversight on my part. Disregard my earlier e-mail. Five air carriers submitted proposals for 

EAS at the Mississippi 5 and Muscle Shoals: 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Muscle Shoals, Alabama; Greenville, 

Laurel/Hattiesburg, Meridian, and Tupelo, Mississippi, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the 

record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued 

Order 2014-4-24 (April22, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EAS for a new term. In 

response to our request, five air carriers submitted proposals: 

• Aerodynamics, Inc. submitted a proposal to serve Laurel/Hattiesburg, Meridian, and Tupelo. 

• Air Choice One submitted a proposal to serve Muscle Shoals, Greenville, and Tupelo. 

• ExpressJet submitted a proposal to serve Laurel/Hattiesburg and Meridian. 

• SeaPort Airlines submitted a proposal to serve Muscle Shoals, Greenville, and Tupelo. 

• SunAir submitted a proposal to serve Muscle Shoals, Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg, and Tupelo. 

I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov 

sometime this afternoon. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as 

possible, but no later than Wednesday, July 9. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on the 

distribution list. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

1
#### § 310.101 Legal restrictions on public officials in the employment of relatives.

Section 3110 of title 5, United States Code, sets forth the legal restrictions on the employment of relatives.