alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Moliris Corp., D/B/A Advantage
Packaging., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), Clyde Parks, Principal Executive and Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Clyde Parks
---------------------------
Clyde Parks
Principal Executive Officer
August 20, 2004


/s/ Clyde Parks
---------------------------
Clyde Parks
Principal Financial Officer
August 20, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be
retained by Moliris Corp, D/B/A Advantage Packaging and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]

                                       29
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2164

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Kevin L. Kivett, Sr. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

____________ Submitted: February 2, 2021 Filed: February 16, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before KELLY, MELLOY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Kevin Kivett appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to drug offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed

1 The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the imposition

of a role-in-the-offense sentencing enhancement, Kivett’s designation as a career offender, and the substantive reasonableness of Kivett’s sentence. After careful review, we discern no clear error in the district court’s imposition of the role enhancement. See United States v. Camacho , 555 F.3d 695, 705-06 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing application of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1). We decline to address Kivett’s challenge to his career-offender status, as his United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”) range would have been the same without the career-offender designation, and we conclude any error was harmless. See United v. Sykes , 854 F.3d 457, 462 (8th Cir. 2017) (reasoning that any error was harmless where it did not change the Guidelines calculation). Finally, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and discussing substantive reasonableness); see also United States v. Callaway , 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014) (noting within-Guidelines sentence is presumed reasonable). Having reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
# L_2019323EN.01002601.xml

| 12.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 323/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 323/26

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 13/2018

of 9 February 2018

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/2049]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1558 of 14 September 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the substance bromelain as regards its maximum residue limit (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1558 of 14 September 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the substance bromelain as regards its maximum residue limit (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1559 of 14 September 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the maximum residue limit of the substance alarelin (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1559 of 14 September 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 to classify the maximum residue limit of the substance alarelin (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indents are added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32017 R 1558: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1558 of 14 September 2017 (OJ L 237, 15.9.2017, p. 67), |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32017 R 1558: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1558 of 14 September 2017 (OJ L 237, 15.9.2017, p. 67),

| — | 32017 R 1559: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1559 of 14 September 2017 (OJ L 237, 15.9.2017, p. 69).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32017 R 1559: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1559 of 14 September 2017 (OJ L 237, 15.9.2017, p. 69).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Regulations (EU) 2017/1558 and (EU) 2017/1559 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 February 2018, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 February 2018.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 237, 15.9.2017, p. 67.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 237, 15.9.2017, p. 69.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §152709. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1419.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152709 | 36:1510. | Dec. 2, 1980, Pub. L. 96–489, §10, 94 Stat. 2554. |

Section

The word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "However, nothing in this section shall be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of her knowledge:

1.               The Registrant’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which this certificationis attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned has set her hand hereto asof the 8th day of May, 2007.
| /s/Nancy J. Baker                       |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which itrelates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form10-Q to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

----
NRC’S PAPO BOARD TO HOLD MEETING TO DISCUSS HANDLING OF 

CLASSIFIED INFORMATION IN YUCCA MOUNTAIN HEARINGS 

 The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel’s Pre-License Application Presiding 

Officer (PAPO) Board will hold a case management meeting Dec. 2 in Rockville, Md., to discuss 

how classified information will be protected and handled during adjudicatory hearings on the 

proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev. 

 Representatives from the Department of Energy, the state of Nevada, and the NRC staff 

will attend the meeting at the ASLB hearing room at NRC headquarters, Two White Flint North, 

11545 Rockville Pike, at 1 p.m. Eastern Time. Other potential parties who have filed a notice of 

appearance may participate either in person or by video hookup in the NRC’s Las Vegas Hearing 

Facility, Pacific Enterprise Plaza, Building 1, 3250 Pepper Lane, Las Vegas, beginning at 10 

a.m. Pacific Time. Members of the public are welcome to observe the meeting at either location. 

The meeting will also be Webcast on the Internet at 

http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=53642. 

 DOE submitted its application for the proposed repository June 3. The NRC staff 

formally docketed the application Sept. 8, and the agency published a notice of opportunity to 

request a hearing Oct. 22 in the Federal Register. 

 Because the application contains some classified information, DOE petitioned the 

Commission to issue a protective order governing access to and handling of that classified 

information during the Yucca Mountain hearings. The Commission subsequently referred that 

petition to the PAPO Board. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-217 November 26, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofTake A Ride, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Social Security Administration

          - 20 CFR Part 404 

# AGENCY:

Social Security Administration. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; partial withdrawal. 

# SUMMARY:

                            We are withdrawing the rules we proposed for evaluating hematological disorders that were included in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the                             **Federal Register**                             on November 27, 2001 (66 FR 59306). In that NPRM, we proposed revisions to both the listings for hematological disorders and the listings for malignant neoplastic diseases. The public comments we received on the NPRM raised significant issues about the proposed listings for some of the hematological disorders, and we have decided to withdraw the proposed rules for hematological disorders while we obtain additional input to resolve these issues. We plan to publish a new NPRM for the hematological disorders listings at a later date. We are publishing separately in today's edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             final rules for evaluating malignant neoplastic diseases.                         

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                            Martin Sussman, Regulations Officer, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration, 100 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, (410) 965-1767 or TTY (410) 966-5609. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet Web site,                             *Social Security Online*, at                             *http://www.socialsecurity.gov/​*.                         

Dated: July 19, 2004. 

Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 

Commissioner of Social Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-24898 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
### SUBCHAPTER XX—GRANTS TO IMPROVE THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESPONSE AND ENFORCEMENT OF PROTECTION ORDERS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title I, §102(a), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 848, substituted "GRANTS TO IMPROVE THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESPONSE" for "GRANTS TO ENCOURAGE ARREST POLICIES" in heading.

Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title I, §1101(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1492, inserted "AND ENFORCEMENT OF PROTECTION ORDERS" at end of heading.
### §22509. Service of process

As a condition to the exercise of any power or privilege granted by this chapter, the corporation shall file, with the secretary of state or other designated official of each State, the name and address of an agent in that State on whom legal process or demands against the corporation may be served.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1305.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22509 | 36:102. | Feb. 24, 1925, ch. 303, §12, 43 Stat. 968. |

Section

The words "precedent", "herein", and "or conferred" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "with the secretary of state or other designated official" are substituted for "in the office of the secretary of each State" for consistency in the revised title. The words "post-office" and "authorized" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Atlantic Rayon Corporation et al., Appellants, and Harold Goldsmith, Doing Business under the Name of Hargold Textiles, Respondent

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 277 App. Div. 554.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6899

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES THOMAS HANCOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-6902

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES THOMAS HANCOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00206-JAB-2; 1:11-cv-00551-JABPTS; 1:07-cr-00071-JAB-1; 1:11-cv-00774-JAB-JLW)

Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Hancock, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

James Thomas Hancock seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motions. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hancock has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
4

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
400 P.2d 480

#### Joseph Alvin MILLER, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Warden of the New Mexico State Penitentiary, Respondent.

No. 7837.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

March 22, 1965.

*66George A. Graham, Jr., Santa Fe, for petitioner.

Boston E. Witt, Atty. Gen., Harry S. Connelly, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks his discharge from the custody of the Warden of the New Mexico State Penitentiary, on exactly the same grounds as were urged in French v. Cox, 1964, *74*N.M. 593, 396 P.2d 423.

We reapprove what was said therein, and find that petitioner, with the advice of able court-appointed counsel, intelligently, competently and understandingly entered guilty pleas to two separate charges of second degree murder; that petitioner was in nowise prejudiced because of the failure to appoint counsel at and prior to the preliminary examination, and that such failure does not require vacating the pleas of guilty entered in the district court.

Plowever, as in French, supra, the petitioner was never sentenced following the acceptance of his guilty pleas in the two murder cases, but was sentenced under the Habitual Criminal Act to a charge contained in an information in Cause No. 2532, Luna County. This sentence, as stated in French, supra, was void. It follows that the commitment under which petitioner is now serving is of no validity, but, inasmuch as petitioner has been legally convicted in the two murder cases (Numbers 2530 and 2531, Luna County) and no legal judgment has been rendered thereon, he should be remanded in order that valid sentences may be pronounced.

, Petitioner should be remanded to the Sheriff of Luna County, to be held by him to await the further action of the district court for the imposition of sentences in Causes Numbered 2530 and 2531. It is so ordered.