alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 AT ROAD, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of At Road, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Krish Panu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. March 12, 2004 /s/ Krish Panu Krish Panu
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 630.702 Definitions.

*Extended voyage* means a voyage of not less than 7 consecutive calendar days duration.

*Oceangoing vessel* means a vessel in use on the high seas or the Great Lakes; but does not include a vessel which operates primarily on rivers, other lakes, bays, sounds or within the 3-nautical-mile limit of the coastal area of the 48 contiguous States, except when used in mapping, charting, or surveying operations or when in or sailing to or from foreign, territorial, Hawaiian, or Alaskan waters, or waters outside its normal area of operations or outside the 3-nautical-mile limit.

*Shore leave* means leave authorized by section 6305(c) of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart.

*Voyage* means the sailing of an oceangoing vessel from one port and its return to that port or the final port of discharge.

[33 FR 12475, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 60 FR 67287, Dec. 29, 1995]
#### Edwin R. La Vin, Appellant, v. Russell C. La Vin et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
NRC STAFF FINALIZES SAFETY EVALUATION FOR VOGTLE 

EARLY SITE PERMIT, LIMITED WORK REQUEST APPLICATIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued the final safety evaluation report 

(FSER) for a requested Early Site Permit (ESP) and limited work authorization (LWA) at the 

Vogtle site, about 25 miles southeast of Augusta, Ga. 

The 800-page FSER contains the agency's review of Southern Nuclear’s ESP and LWA 

applications, and incorporates comments from the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. 

The NRC staff reviewed information on: 

– site seismology, geology, meteorology and hydrology; 

– risks from potential accidents resulting from operation of a nuclear plant at the site; 

– the site’s ability to support adequate physical security for a nuclear plant; and 

– proposed major features of the emergency plan Southern Nuclear would implement if 

reactors are eventually built at the site. 

The report is available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, 

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., and on the NRC’s Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/esp/vogtle.html. 

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental 

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. 

Southern Nuclear filed the Vogtle ESP application Aug. 15, 2006. Southern filed a related LWA 

request on Aug. 16, 2007, seeking permission for construction activities limited to placement of 

engineered backfill, retaining walls, lean concrete, mudmats, and a waterproof membrane. 

The staff issued a final Environmental Impact Statement for the ESP and LWA in August 

2008. The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board must also conclude a hearing on the application 

before the agency’s final decision on the Vogtle ESP, which is currently expected by late 2009. 

In a separate review, the NRC is considering Southern Nuclear’s application for a Combined 

License to build and operate two AP1000 reactors on the Vogtle ESP site. Southern currently 

operates two reactors on land adjacent to the site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-026 February 11, 2009
Information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 630.1010 Termination of medical emergency. ( a ) The medical emergency affecting a leave recipient shall terminate— ( 1 ) When the leave recipient's Federal service terminates;
( 2 ) When the leave recipient leaves the agency or participating organizational subunit, if the bank board so determines;
( 3 ) At the end of the biweekly pay period in which the leave bank board receives written notice from the leave recipient or from a personal representative of the leave recipient that the leave recipient is no longer affected by a medical emergency;
( 4 ) At the end of the biweekly pay period in which the leave bank board determines, after written notice from the bank board and an opportunity for the leave recipient (or, if appropriate, a personal representative of the leave recipient) to answer orally or in writing, that the leave recipient is no longer affected by a medical emergency; or
( 5 ) At the end of the biweekly pay period in which the agency receives notice that the Office of Personnel Management has approved an application for disability retirement for the leave recipient under the Civil Service Retirement System or the Federal Employees Retirement System.
( b ) The leave bank board shall ensure that annual leave withdrawn from the leave bank and not used before the termination of a leave recipient's medical emergency shall be returned to the leave bank.
( c ) The leave bank board may deem a medical emergency to continue for the purpose of providing a leave recipient an adequate period of time within which to receive contributions of annual leave.
( d ) If a leave recipient elects to buy back annual leave as a result of a claim for an employment-related injury approved by the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs under 20 CFR 10.202 and 10.310, the amount of annual leave withdrawn from the leave bank that is bought back by the leave recipient shall be restored to the leave bank.
[59 FR 67129, Dec. 29, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 64451, Dec. 5, 1996]
NRC ISSUES ANNUAL REPORT ON 

ABNORMAL OCCURRENCES FOR FY2008 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released its annual report on abnormal occurrences 

for fiscal year 2008, citing 10 incidents that occurred in licensed medical facilities during that 

period. 

 An accident or event is considered an abnormal occurrence if it involves a major reduction 

in the degree of protection of public health and safety. Abnormal occurrences can include, but are 

not necessarily limited to, moderate exposure to or release of radioactive material licensed by the 

NRC; major degradation of safety-related equipment; or major deficiencies in design, construction, 

use of or management controls for facilities or radioactive material licensed by the NRC. 

 For FY 2008, there were no abnormal occurrences at NRC-licensed nuclear power reactors. 

Five of the 10 abnormal occurrences in medical facilities involved NRC licensees, while the rest 

involved Agreement State licensees. (Thirty-six states have entered into agreements with the NRC 

to regulate radioactive materials.) Two of the events involved exposure of an embryo or fetus. The 

rest were medical events, such as misadministration of radioactive material during diagnostic or 

therapeutic procedures. Thousands of such procedures are conducted in U.S. medical facilities each 

year. 

 The report details investigations of each incident by the NRC, Agreement States and 

licensees, as well as measures taken to ensure such incidents do not recur. 

 The report on abnormal occurrences for fiscal year 2008 is published as NUREG-0090, vol. 

31. The report was transmitted to Congress on May 16 and is available on the NRC Web site at this 

address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/congress-docs/correspondence/2009/. A 

notice of the report’s availability was published June 8 in the Federal Register. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa.resource@nrc.gov

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 09-110 June 12, 2009
### §21306. Period of increase

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall provide an increase in the amount provided to a State under the covered formula grants under this chapter for a 2-year period.

#### (b) Limit

The Attorney General may not provide an increase in the amount provided to a State under the covered formula grants under this chapter more than 4 times.

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IV, §407, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043h–5 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §717a. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 647

Section, act Feb. 25, 1929, ch. 313, §5, 45 Stat. 1262, provided for the detail of superintendents and engineers to duty at Washington.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)	The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 19, 2008              By: /s/ Paul Sorkin
                                     -----------------------------------
                                     PAUL SORKIN
                                     Chief Executive Officer


<page>
**EXHIBIT NO. 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

Armstrong WorldIndustries, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-74501 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No., 33-91890, 33-18996, 33-18997, 33-65768 and 333-79093 on Form S-8 of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and shareholder’s equity and the related financial statementschedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 

 

Our report dated March 14, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Companyand two of its domestic subsidiaries filed separate voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on December 6, 2000 and the Company has also defaulted on certain debt obligations. Our report also states thatthe filing under Chapter 11 and the resulting increased uncertainty regarding the Company’s potential asbestos liabilities raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 28, 2005
### §170509. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1446.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170509 | 36:2510. | July 23, 1984, Pub. L. 98–372, §10, 98 Stat. 1240. |

Section

In this section, the word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "Nothing in this section shall be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.
The Law Offices of William F. McDonough

35588 Center Ridge

North Ridgeville,

Phone: (440) 327-1542

Email : TricountylawOhio@qmail. com

Website: www.d ronelaw. us

December 28.2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management SYstem

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, Washington, DC 20590

RE:PropelledMedia,Inc.'sPetitionfora333Exemption

Dear SirorMadam:

Attached please find propelled Media, Inc.'s ("Propelled Media") request fcrr an exemption

from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of its Small

Unmanned Aircraft Systems ("sUASs") for aerial photography and videography' This

exemption request is exclusively for the use of the UAS manufactured by D.tI Innovations, a

Hong Kong based company.

Also attached to this letter is the link to the DJI Phantom 3 Professional User's Manual

(hereinafter ,'Manual"), which outlines the operating requirements, limitations, and technical

specifications for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional system. Fropelled Media has reviewed

this Manual and has found it to be acceptable for sUAS aetial photography operations'

Thank you for your time and consideration, and please let me know if you have any

questions.

Road, Unit #3

Ohio 44039

Very truly yours,

. q/)f7 rt ' u /.// "/ lt ,/q*

/

McDonough

Counsel for ProPelled Media, Inc.

WTM:maf
### SUBCHAPTER III—NOAA FLEET MODERNIZATION
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul Jensen et al., Respondent, against Chenango G. L. F. Corp. et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*876Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2028

AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, with rePledge of Allegiance. certain cases and controversies involving the spect to the jurisdiction of Federal courts over

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 2028

AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to

the jurisdiction of Federal courts over certain cases and

controversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2028 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pledge Protection Act

3 of 2004’’.

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing:

8 ‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction

9 ‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any

10 jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appel11 late jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining

12 to the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitu13 tion of, the Pledge of Allegiance, as defined in section 4

14 of title 4, or its recitation.’’. The limitation in this section

15 shall not apply to the Superior Court of the District of

16 Columbia or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

18 at the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States
3

•HR 2028 EH

1 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

2 item:

‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 23,

2004.

Attest:

Clerk.
### §30308. Requirement that accreditation organizations adopt accreditation standards

#### (a) Eligibility for Federal grants

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an organization responsible for the accreditation of Federal, State, local, or private prisons, jails, or other penal facilities may not receive any new Federal grants during any period in which such organization fails to meet any of the requirements of subsection (b).

#### (b) Requirements

To be eligible to receive Federal grants, an accreditation organization referred to in subsection (a) must meet the following requirements:

(1) At all times after 90 days after September 4, 2003, the organization shall have in effect, for each facility that it is responsible for accrediting, accreditation standards for the detection, prevention, reduction, and punishment of prison rape.

(2) At all times after 1 year after the date of the adoption of the final rule under section 30307(a)(4) of this title, the organization shall, in addition to any other such standards that it may promulgate relevant to the detection, prevention, reduction, and punishment of prison rape, adopt accreditation standards consistent with the national standards adopted pursuant to such final rule.

(Pub. L. 108–79, §9, Sept. 4, 2003, 117 Stat. 987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15608 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Phillip C. Bowman, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Bank Holdings,Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and the financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

a)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date: August  13, 2004 |
|------------------------|
|                   |
|                   | /s/ Phillip  C. Bowman |   |
|                   | Phillip C.  Bowman |
|                   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
### §21701. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) the terms "abuse", "adult protective services", "elder", "elder justice", "exploitation", "law enforcement", and "neglect" have the meanings given those terms in section 1397j of title 42;

(2) the term "elder abuse" includes abuse, neglect, and exploitation of an elder; and

(3) the term "State" means each of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 115–70, §2, Oct. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 115–70, Oct. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1208, known as the Elder Abuse Prevention and Prosecution Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2017 Amendment note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.
§ 792.105 Agency responsibilities. ( a ) Agencies shall establish and administer programs through which practitioners who are knowledgeable in counseling and referral services can offer and provide employees who have alcohol and/or drug problems short-term counseling and/or referrals for long-term counseling or treatment.
( b ) Agencies must issue internal instructions implementing the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 7361-7363 and this subpart.
( c ) Whenever a manager/supervisor becomes aware that a Federal employee's use of alcohol and/or drugs may be contributing to a performance or conduct deficiency, the manager/supervisor shall recommend counseling and refer the employee to the agency counseling program. If an employee fails to participate in any rehabilitative program or, having participated, the employee fails to bring conduct or performance up to satisfactory level, the agency shall evaluate the employee accordingly and initiate an appropriate performance-based or adverse action.
( d ) As requested, agencies shall annually submit a report to OPM on their counseling activities for the past fiscal year at a time, and in a manner, set by OPM.
[49 FR 27921, July 9, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 16692, Apr. 29, 1985; 77 FR 42908, July 20, 2012]
#### § 610.306 Supplemental regulations.

Each agency is authorized to issue supplemental regulations not inconsistent with this subpart.

[33 FR 12474, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 34 FR 2479, Feb. 21, 1969]