alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John M. Wright, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of American Bank Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and the financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 14, 2004

 
|   | /s/ John M. Wright                                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | John M. Wright                                    |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
NRC ISSUES MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS FOR NATION’S NUCLEAR PLANTS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued mid-cycle assessment letters to the 

nation’s 104 operating commercial nuclear power plants. The agency’s most recent assessments 

show all the plants continue to operate safely. 

“We ensure nuclear power plants are safe, inspecting them and rating their performance 

regularly, as part of our mission to protect people and the environment,” said Fred Brown, 

Director of the Division of Inspection and Regional Support in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation. “The latest round of assessments shows that 90 percent of the nation’s 

commercial nuclear power plants require only the basic level of attention by the agency. This is 

an improvement from a year ago, when only 72 percent of the plants required this lower level of 

oversight.” 

If a nuclear power plant’s performance declines, the NRC assigns additional resources to 

ensure the plant operator is taking the steps necessary to correct the situation. Only one plant, 

Palo Verde in Arizona, requires the NRC’s highest level of attention, which will include 

additional inspections this fall to confirm the plant’s performance issues are being addressed. 

Five plants require significantly increased NRC attention, and another five plants get some 

additional attention. These numbers are significantly lower than last year’s mid-cycle 

assessments. 

A list of each plant’s current performance rating is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/actionmatrix_summary.html. 

Updated information on plant performance is posted to the NRC Web site every quarter. 

In addition to the mid-cycle assessment letters, the plants will also receive annual assessment 

letters in March 2009. The mid-cycle assessment letters sent to each licensee are available on the 

NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-163 September 4, 2008
### **CHAPTER 1547—NON COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED**

Sec.
154701.
Definition.
154702.
Organization.
154703.
Purposes.
154704.
Membership.
154705.
Governing body.
154706.
Powers.
154707.
Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges.
154708.
Restrictions.
154709.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
154710.
Records and inspection.
154711.
Service of process.
154712.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
154713.
Annual report.
### §109. Father's Day

(a) Designation.—The third Sunday in June is Father's Day.

(b) Proclamation.—The President is requested to issue a proclamation—

(1) calling on United States Government officials to display the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on Father's Day;

(2) inviting State and local governments and the people of the United States to observe Father's Day with appropriate ceremonies; and

(3) urging the people of the United States to offer public and private expressions of Father's Day to the abiding love and gratitude they have for their fathers.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1256.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 109(a) | 36:142a (1st sentence). | Apr. 24, 1972, Pub. L. 92–278, 86 Stat. 124. |
| 109(b) | 36:142a (last sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (b)(1), the word "appropriate" is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "State and local governments" are substituted for "the governments of the States and communities" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.
#### § 839.1303 Are there any types of decisions that I cannot appeal?

Yes, OPM's decisions under subpart L (Discretionary Actions by OPM) are final and conclusive and are not subject to administrative or judicial review.
---

EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Monique van Oord, Chief Financial Officer of Teryl Resources
  Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources Corp. for
  the year ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
  Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, British Columbia, Canada |                          
|---------------------------------- | -------------------------
|                                   |                          
|                                   | by:  /s/ Monique van Oord
|                                   |                          
|October 19, 2007                   |                          
|                                   |                          
|                                   | Monique van Oord         
|                                   |                          
|                                   | Chief Financial Officer  



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained by Teryl
  Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
  staff upon request.



---
#### GALUMBECK v. SUBURBAN PARK STORES CORP. et al.

No. 6797.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 14,1954.

Decided July 16, 1954.

Howard I. Legum, Norfolk, Va. (Louis B. Fine, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellant.

Bertram S. Nusbaum, Norfolk, Va. (Richard J. Alfriend, III, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 This is an appeal from an order dismissing an action as barred by the statute of limitations. The action was instituted to recover damages for breach of an agreement by the terms of which the defendant Cohen purporting to act as president of the Suburban Park Stores Corporation, a corporation which did not in fact exist, agreed to erect a gasoline station on property which he did not own and lease it to plaintiff for a period of ten years beginning May 1, 1941. The agreement was not a lease, but an agreement to erect a building and lease it; and it is clear that the agreement was breached when the defendant failed to erect the gasoline station and lease it to plaintiff in accordance with the terms of the agreement and that this breach occurred when there was a failure to do this by May 1, 1941, as provided in the agreement. As action was not instituted until more than ten years thereafter, it is clearly barred by the Virginia five year statute of limitations, Code 1950 Va. § 8-13. The contention that the agreement constituted a lease of the property, which defendant did not own and therefore could not lease, and that the statute began to run only from the termination of the term of the lease, is so lacking in merit as not to warrant discussion. Equally frivolous is the contention that the running of the statute *661was tolled by the fact that defendant Cohen falsely represented that the Suburban Park Stores Corporation was a Virginia corporation and that it owned the property in question. The representation, if made, had no tendency to conceal the breach of the agreement sued on or prevent institution of suit to recover damages for any cause of action arising out of the breach, including the cause of action based on the alleged breach of warranty of authority by Cohen.

Affirmed.
#### Philip Zwiebel et al., appellees, v. William Sehestedt et al., appellants.

Filed December 10, 1910.

16,225.

1. Mortgages: Foreclosure: Appraisal: Presumptions. “An order denying a motion to vacate an appraisement of property for judicial sale on the ground that the appraisers’ valuation was too low will, in the absence of a hill of exceptions embodying the evidence given at the hearing, he presumed to be correct.” *Johnston v. Craig,*61 Neb. 98.

2. -: -: -: Certificate of Liens: Confirmation of Sale. The failure of a county clerk to include in his certificate a statement of liens junior to those for the satisfaction of which the defendants’ land is to he sold, and his failure to attach his official seal to said certificate, do not prejudice the owners of the equity of redemption, and should not prevent the confirmation of a sale otherwise regular and lawful.

Appeal from the district court for Sarpy county: Lee S. Estelle, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Anthony E. Langdon,*for appellants.

*B. F. Thomas, Oarl E. Herring*and *H. Z. Wedgwood, contra.*

Root, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling objections to the appraisal of, and to the confirmation of, a sale of certain real estate. The defendants appeal.

It is first argued that the appraised value of the real estate is too low. No bill of exceptions of the evidence submitted to the district court concerning the value of the real estate has been filed in this court, and we shall presume that the finding of the trial court upon the issue of value is sustained by the evidence. *Johnson v. Craig,*61 Neb. 98.

The defendants contend that the district court erred in permitting the county clerk to attach his seal to his cer*101tificatu of incumbrances, and that the certificate is insufficient in that it does not refer to any liens junior to those included in the decree of foreclosure. The appellants own the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises, and would not have been prejudiced if no certificate of liens had been filed. *La Flume v. Jones,*5 Neb. 256; *Smith v. Foxworthy,*39 Neb. 214; *Hamer v. McKinley-Lanning Loan & Trust Co.,*52 Neb. 705; *Ballou v. Sherwood,*58 Neb. 20; *Green v. Paul,*60 Neb. 7. It appears that the only incumbrances deducted were taxes, and that the property sold for more than two-thirds of its gross value as determined by the sheriff and the other appraisers.

For the reason that we find nothing in the record to suggest a suspicion that the appellants were in any manner prejudiced by the matters referred to in their brief, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
### §3323. Warrants

(a) Except as provided in section 3326 of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury may pay out money only against a warrant. A warrant shall be—

(1) authorized by law;

(2) signed by the Secretary; and

(3) countersigned by the Comptroller General.

(b)(1) A disbursing official shall send to the Secretary with a warrant a certificate under section 3526 of this title, or a requisition for an advance. The certificate or requisition shall state the appropriation to which the payment is to be charged.

(2) The Secretary shall return the certificate or requisition to the Comptroller General with the date and amount endorsed on the certificate or requisition.

(c) A requisition for the payment of money on an audited account or for depositing money in the Treasury is not required.

(d) The Secretary and the Comptroller General shall charge to the appropriate appropriation in their books any money paid by a warrant.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 950.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3323(a) | 31:44(1st sentence). | June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §304(1st par. 1st sentence), 42 Stat. 24. |
| | 31:76(2d sentence words before 3d comma). | July 31, 1894, ch. 174, §11(2d, 3d sentences), 28 Stat. 209. |
| | 31:147(related to disbursement). | R.S. §305(related to disbursement); July 31, 1894, ch. 174, §11(last sentence related to §305), 28 Stat. 209. |
| 3323(b) | 31:76(2d sentence words after 3d comma). | |
| 3323(c) | 31:76(3d sentence). | |
| 3323(d) | 31:44(1st sentence). | |
| | 31:77. | R.S. §3675. |

In the section, the words "Comptroller General" are substituted for "General Accounting Office" for consistency.

Subsection (a) is substituted for 31:76(2d sentence words before 3d comma) and 147(related to disbursement) to eliminate unnecessary words and for clarity and consistency.

In subsection (b), the word "Secretary" is substituted for "Treasurer" because of the source provisions restated in section 321 of the revised title.

In subsection (b)(1), the words "instead of being specified on the warrant" are omitted as surplus. The reference to "section 3526 of this title" is used because section 72, referred to in 31:76, has been omitted from the restatement superseded by 31:82i and 31:82i is restated in section 3526.

In subsection (c), the word "depositing" is substituted for "covering" for clarity and consistency.
§ 330.204 Agency requirements and responsibilities. ( a ) An agency must establish policies and maintain an RPL for each local commuting area in which the agency has RPL eligibles.
( b ) An agency must give each RPL eligible information about its RPL program, including Merit Systems Protection Board appeal rights under § 330.214, when: ( 1 ) The agency issues a RIF separation notice or a Certification of Expected Separation under part 351 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) The employee accepts a position at a lower grade or pay level or is separated from the agency because of a compensable work-related injury.
( c ) An agency must register an RPL eligible on the appropriate RPL no later than 10 calendar days after receiving the eligible's written application.
( d ) Agencies must include in their RPL policies established under this subpart how they will assist RPL eligibles who: ( 1 ) Request an RPL application;
( 2 ) Request help in completing the RPL application; and
( 3 ) Request help in identifying and listing on the RPL application those positions within the agency for which they are qualified and interested.
( e ) An agency must give RPL registrants placement priority for personnel actions as described in § 330.210.
( f ) An agency must not remove an individual from the RPL under § 330.209(a)(1), (b)(1), or (b)(2) without evidence (such as a Postal Service return receipt signed by addressee only) showing that the offer, inquiry, or scheduled interview was made in writing. The written offer, inquiry, or scheduled interview must clearly state that failure to respond will result in removal from the RPL for positions at that grade or pay level and for positions at lower grades and pay levels for which registered.
§ 841.410 Contents of petition for appeal of normal cost percentage. ( a ) To file an appeal, an agency head must, before expiration of the time limit, file with OPM— ( 1 ) A letter of appeal;
( 2 ) An actuarial report; and
( 3 ) A certificate of eligibility (described in paragraph (d) of this section).
( b ) ( 1 ) The letter of appeal must be in writing and signed by the agency head. Delegation of signatory authority is not permitted.
( 2 ) The letter of appeal may contain any argument the agency wishes to make or may simply submit the actuarial report for consideration.
( c ) The actuarial report must contain a detailed actuarial analysis of the normal cost of FERS benefits as applied to the employees of that agency in the category of employees for which the agency is appealing. The actuarial report must— ( 1 ) Be signed by an actuary;
( 2 ) Use the economic assumptions under § 841.405; and
( 3 ) Specifically address and consider each of the demographic factors listed in § 841.404. The appealing agency is responsible for developing data relating to the first nine demographic factors as they relate to the category of agency employees for which the appeal is being filed. OPM's demographic factors (available from OPM) will be presumed to be sufficient and reliable for factors 10 through 13 unless the appealing agency is able to demonstrate, through sufficient and reliable data relating to its employees or former employees, the use of alternative factors is appropriate. The fourteenth factor, administrative expenses, will be supplied by OPM.
( d ) The certificate of eligibility is a letter from the agency's director of personnel certifying that the agency has the requisite 1,000 or 500 in the category of employees under consideration.
[51 FR 47187, Dec. 31, 1986, as amended at 82 FR 49280, Oct. 25, 2017]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

The Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence, Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The January 18, 2019 public hearing in Washington, DC, on proposed amendments to the Evidence Rules has been canceled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules Committee Secretary, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Announcements for this hearing were previously published in 83 FR 39463 and 83 FR44305.

Dated: December 20, 2018.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Rules Committee Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-28160 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
### §702a–4. Fuse-plug levees

After the Eudora Floodway shall have been constructed and is ready for operation, the fuse-plug levees now at the head of the Boeuf and Tensas Basins shall be constructed to the 1914 grade and the 1928 section. The fuse-plug levees at the head of the Atchafalaya Basin on the west side shall be constructed to the 1914 grade and the 1928 section. The fuse-plug levees at the head of the Atchafalaya Basin on the east side of the Atchafalaya River shall be constructed to the 1914 grade and 1928 section, and, after the Morganza Floodway has been completed, shall be raised to the 1928 grade as provided in section 702a–3 of this title. Thereafter those stretches of said levees which are left as fuse-plug levees shall be reconstructed and maintained as herein provided, subject to the provisions of section 702a–3 of this title. Any funds appropriated under authority of sections 702g–1 and 702k–1 of this title may be expended for this purpose.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 548, §10, 49 Stat. 1511.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Herein, referred to in text, means act June 15, 1936, ch. 548, 49 Stat. 1508, which enacted sections 642a, 702a–1, 702a–2 to 702a–12, 702g–1, 702j–1, 702j–2, 702k–1, and 702k–2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
### §152506. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation and its subordinate divisions and regional, State, and local chapters have the exclusive right to use the name "National Safety Council". The corporation has the exclusive right to use and to allow others to use seals, emblems, and badges the corporation adopts. This section does not affect any vested rights.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1417.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 152506 | 36:477. | Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 429, §17, 67 Stat. 574. |

Section

The words "and such emblems, seals, and badges as have heretofore been used by the Illinois corporation referred to in section 478 of this title in carrying out its program" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "This section does not affect any vested rights" are substituted for "it being distinctly understood, however, that nothing in this chapter shall interfere or conflict with established or vested rights" to eliminate unnecessary words.