alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018073EN.01002501.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/25

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 150/2016

of 8 July 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/372]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/621 of 21 April 2016 amending Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/621 of 21 April 2016 amending Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/622 of 21 April 2016 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/622 of 21 April 2016 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indents are added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 0621: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/621 of 21 April 2016 (OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 4), |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 0621: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/621 of 21 April 2016 (OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 4),

| — | 32016 R 0622: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/622 of 21 April 2016 (OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 7).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32016 R 0622: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/622 of 21 April 2016 (OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 7).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulations (EU) 2016/621 and (EU) 2016/622 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 9 July 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 4.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 7.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §153104. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation and its subordinate divisions have the exclusive right to use the name "National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution". The corporation has the exclusive right to use and to allow others to use seals, emblems, and badges the corporation adopts.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1423.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153104 | 36:18c. | Feb. 20, 1896, ch. 23, §4, as added Oct. 1, 1976, Pub. L. 94–443, §2, 90 Stat. 1475. |

Section

The word "sole" is omitted as included in "exclusive". The words "the corporation adopts" are substituted for "as have heretofore been adopted or used by the National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution" for consistency in the revised title.
### **CHAPTER 2207—UNITED STATES SUBMARINE VETERANS OF WORLD WAR II**

Sec.
220701.
Definition.
220702.
Organization.
220703.
Purposes.
220704.
Membership.
220705.
Governing body.
220706.
Powers.
220707.
Restrictions.
220708.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
220709.
Records and inspection.
220710.
Service of process.
220711.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
220712.
Annual report.
B.C.D. 02-91

DEC 0 6 2002

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Cuyahoga Valley Railway Company

River Terminal Railway Company

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding

the continued status of Cuyahoga Valley Railway Company and

River Terminal Railway Company, as employers under the

Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seq.) (RRA) and the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seq.)

(RUIA).

Cuyahoga Valley was held to be an employer under the Acts

effective May 18, 1905, (B.A. Number 4207). River Terminal was

held to be an employer under the Acts effective December 8, 1909,

(B.A. Number 4346).

On May 17, 2002, the assets of these two companies were sold and

are now part of a new railroad company, ISG Cleveland Works

Railway Company, which was held by the Board to be an employer

effective May 5, 2002 (B.C.D. No. 02-72.V, B.A. No. 4276). Section

202.11 of the Board’s regulations provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall

terminate whenever such company or person loses any of the

characteristics essential to the existence of an employer

status.

Through the sale of rail assets and cessation of operations,

Cuyahoga Valley and River Terminal have lost the characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status. Accordingly, the

Board holds that these companies ceased to be employers under

the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Acts effective with the close of business on May 17, 2002. Cf. Rev

BA# 4346

.1
-2-

Cuyahoga Valley Railway Company

River Terminal Railway Company

Ruling 82-99, 1982-2 C.B. 154, wherein the Internal Revenue

Service ruled that a railroad ceases to be an employer subject to

taxes under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act when the railroad’s

employees stop performing services in connection with the

railroad’s carrier activities.

Original signed by:

Cherry1 T. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever
#### Julia E. Wood Administratrix, Appellee, v. James E. McEvoy and Julia Wood McEvoy, Appellants.

Gen. No. 5,874.

(liot to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Edgae Eldbedge, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action commenced in *assumpsit*by William Wood against his sister, Julia Wood McEvoy, and her husband, James E. McEvoy, to recover thirteen hundred and fifty dollars received by defendants as the purchase price for a twenty acre tract of land and an undivided half interest in another twenty acre tract conveyed by them to one Hansel, which lands plaintiff claimed to own. After a partial trial before a jury the case was transferred to the chancery side, bill and answer filed and proofs heard by the chancellor, resulting in a decree against the defendants for the whole amount with interest, less a counterclaim about which there was no dispute. From the decree, defendants appeal.

Cornelius Reardon and Browne & Wiley, for appellants.

Duncan, Doyle & O’Conor and C. F. Hanson, for appellee.

*294Abstract of the Decision.

Trusts, § *44*
      ***
      *—when equitable owner of land sold by holder of record title entitled to the purchase money.*On bill filed to recover a certain sum received by defendants as purchase money for certain land sold by defendants, of which land complainant claimed he was the equitable owner, a decree in favor of complainant *held*sustained by the evidence, it appearing that the land in question was purchased by complainant with his money and the deed taken in the name of his father, to protect him against his own improvidence, and that the father had subsequently deeded the property to his daughter, one of the defendants, for a nominal consideration, and it also appearing that the fact of the conveyance was not known to two of the children, including complainant, and that the deed was not recorded until after the father’s death.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Seamprufe, Inc., Appellant, v. Easton Industrial Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag,
TS – 11KK6F, Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, DSC Trace

Reacted
### §874. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §271(5), Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3094

Section, act July 22, 1947, ch. 286, §1, 61 Stat. 400; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, related to transportation of deceased officers' effects and reimbursement for supplies furnished distressed and shipwrecked persons. See section 3075 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-41240

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-117-1

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Rodriguez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

being a felon in possession of firearm ammunition in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). He argues for the first time

on appeal that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on its face and as

applied to the instant case because it does not require a

substantial effect on interstate commerce. He also argues for

the first time on appeal that his conviction should be reversed

because the indictment does not allege that the offense had a
No. 05-41240

-2-

substantial impact on interstate commerce. He acknowledges that

these arguments are foreclosed by precedent, but raises them to

preserve them for possible Supreme Court review. 

We have repeatedly held that “the constitutionality of

§ 922(g) is not open to question.” United States v. Daugherty,

264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001)(quoting United States v.

DeLeon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999)). Evidence that a

weapon was manufactured in one state and possessed in another is

sufficient to sustain a conviction under § 922(g). Daugherty,

264 F.3d at 518; United States v. Kuban, 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th

Cir. 1996); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir.

1996). Additionally, in United States v. Gresham, 118 F.3d 258,

264-65 (5th Cir. 1997), we rejected a challenge to the

sufficiency of the indictment under § 922(g)(1) that was

identical to the one raised by Rodriguez in this case. 

Accordingly, Rodriguez’s challenges to the constitutionality of

§ 922(g)(1) and to the indictment are foreclosed by circuit

precedent.

AFFIRMED.
### **CHAPTER 14—ISSUE OF PATENT**

Sec.
151.
Issue of patent.
152.
Issue of patent to assignee.
153.
How issued.
154.
Contents and term of patent; provisional rights.
[155, 155A. Repealed.]
156.
Extension of patent term.
[157.
Repealed.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(k), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335, struck out items 155 "Patent term extension" and 155A "Patent term restoration".

Pub. L. 112–29, §3(e)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 287, struck out item 157 "Statutory invention registration".

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4507(6)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–566, inserted "; provisional rights" after "patent" in item 154.

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–622, title I, §102(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3384, added item 157.

Pub. L. 98–417, title II, §201(b), Sept. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 1602, added item 156.

**1983**—Pub. L. 98–127, §4(b), Oct. 13, 1983, 97 Stat. 833, added item 155A.

Pub. L. 97–414, §11(b), Jan. 4, 1983, 96 Stat. 2066, added item 155.

**1965**—Pub. L. 89–83, §6, July 24, 1965, 79 Stat. 261, substituted "Issue of patent" for "Time of issue of patent" in item 151.
### §3607. Public-private use policy

The Council shall maintain a policy that defines processes for making decisions about the roles of the Federal Government, the States, regional coastal observing systems, the academic community, and the private sector in providing to end-user communities environmental information, products, technologies, and services related to the System. The Administrator shall ensure that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration adheres to the decision making process developed by the Council regarding the roles of the Federal Government, the States, the regional coastal observing systems, the academic community, and the private sector in providing end-user communities environmental information, data products, technologies, and services related to the System.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12308, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1435; Pub. L. 116–271, title I, §106, Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3340.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–271 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section required the Council to develop a public-private use policy within 6 months after March 30, 2009.
### §§1233 to 1236. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §406(c), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4266

Section 1233, act Apr. 28, 1908, ch. 151, §1, 35 Stat. 69; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to regulations as to regattas or marine parades. See section 70041(a) of Title 46, Shipping.

Section 1234, act Apr. 28, 1908, ch. 151, §2, 35 Stat. 69; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to enforcement of regulations and use of public or private vessels. See section 70041(b) of Title 46.

Section 1235, act Apr. 28, 1908, ch. 151, §3, 35 Stat. 69; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to transfer of authority to regulate to head of other department. See section 70041(c) of Title 46.

Section 1236, act Apr. 28, 1908, ch. 151, §4, 35 Stat. 69; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4302(k), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 539, related to penalties for violations of regulations. See section 70041(d) of Title 46.
#### Stewart W. Chaffee, Respondent, v. Vladimir Kitter, Appellant.

Ro opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

 DCN: SE02152

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1727 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1727

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the dollar 
             limitation on contributions to funeral trusts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2003

 Mr. Camp (for himself and Mr. Sandlin) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the dollar 
             limitation on contributions to funeral trusts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DOLLAR LIMITATION ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO FUNERAL 
              TRUSTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 685 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to treatment of funeral trusts) is 
repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsections (d), (e), and (f) of such 
section are redesignated as subsections (c), (d), and (e), 
respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Global Broadcast Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, SAM WINER, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 19, 2004



/s/ Sam WinerSam WinerChief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors
NRC NEWS                      U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                             Office of Public Affairs Region IV                            611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400                        Arlington, TX  76011-4005

No. IV-06-026 November 28, 2006Contact: Victor Dricks                                                                        E-Mail: opa4@nrc.govPhone: 817-860-8128

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT OFFICIALSTO DISCUSS SECURITY ISSUES 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with South Texas ProjectNuclear Operating Co. officials on December 4, to discuss the results of its review of recentsecurity issues at the South Texas Project nuclear plant near Bay City, Texas.

A summary of the results of NRC’s review of recent security issues at STP is available onthe NRC web site at:http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/for-the-record/2006/south-texas-project.pdf .

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 1 p.m. in the NRCRegion IV offices in Arlington, Texas.  The public will have an opportunity to observe and askquestions of NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.  Members of the public can listen to themeeting via a special telephone line by calling 1-800-952-9677, and requesting ext. 474. 

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBElink.  E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1646

To amend the Uniform Time Act of 1966 to modify the State exemption 

provisions for advancement of time. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2003

Ms. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Uniform Time Act of 1966 to modify the 

State exemption provisions for advancement of time.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF STATE EXEMPTION PROVI4 SIONS FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TIME. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(a) of the Uniform Time 

6 Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a(a)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘either the entire State as provided in (1) or may exempt 

8 the entire area of the State lying within any time zone’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘the entire State as provided in (1)’’. 
2

•HR 1646 IH 

1 (b) APPLICATION.—Notwithstanding section (3)(b) of 

2 the Uniform Time Act of 1966, the amendment made by 

3 subsection (a) shall not apply to any State which enacts 

4 a law after the date of the enactment of this Act and prior 

5 to April 6, 2004, which exempts the entire area of the 

6 State lying within any time zone from the provisions of 

7 section 3(a) of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 providing 

8 for the advancement of time. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

10 (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), this 

11 section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

12 of this Act. 

13 (2) The amendment made by subsection (a) 

14 shall take effect April 5, 2005.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2003N-0481]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Food Additive Petitions

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Food Additive Petitions'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Office of Information 
Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of June 4, 2004 (69 
FR 31617), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0546. 
The approval expires on November 30, 2006. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: November 3, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-24992 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
§ 7301.101 General. ( a ) *Purpose.* In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to employees of the Inter-American Foundation, with the exception of members of the Foundation's Board of Directors and Advisory Council, and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. In addition to the standards in 5 CFR part 2635, directors and other employees are subject to the executive branch financial disclosure regulations contained in 5 CFR part 2634.
( b ) *Designated agency ethics official.* For purposes of this part and otherwise as required by 5 CFR 2638.202, the General Counsel of the Inter-American Foundation shall serve as the designated agency ethics official. The Deputy General Counsel shall serve as the alternate agency ethics official.
[59 FR 3772, Jan. 27, 1994]