alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC STAFF ISSUES SAFETY EVALUATION FOR VOGTLE 

EARLY SITE PERMIT, LIMITED WORK REQUEST APPLICATIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its safety evaluation report (SER) 

for a requested Early Site Permit (ESP) and limited work authorization (LWA) at the Vogtle site, 

about 25 miles southeast of Augusta, Ga. 

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental 

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. 

Southern Nuclear filed the Vogtle ESP application Aug. 15, 2006. Southern filed a related LWA 

request on Aug. 16, 2007, seeking permission for construction activities limited to placement of 

engineered backfill, retaining walls, lean concrete, mudmats, and a waterproof membrane. 

In a separate review, the NRC is considering Southern’s application for a Combined 

License to build and operate two AP1000 reactors on the Vogtle ESP site. Southern currently 

operates two reactors on land adjacent to the site. 

The 800-page SER contains the agency's review of Southern’s ESP and LWA 

applications. The NRC staff reviewed information on: 

– site seismology, geology, meteorology and hydrology; 

– risks from potential accidents resulting from operation of a nuclear plant at the site; 

– the site’s ability to support adequate physical security for a nuclear plant; and 

– proposed major features of the emergency plan Southern would implement if reactors are 

eventually built at the site. 

The report is available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document 

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., and on the NRC’s Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/esp/vogtle.html. In addition, the Burke County Library 

in Waynesboro, Ga., has agreed to make the SER available for public inspection. 

The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will review the SER during their 

December 4-6 meeting and could suggest changes before the staff finalizes the report. The 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-210 November 18, 2008
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board must also conclude a hearing on the application before the 

agency’s final decision on the Vogtle ESP, which is currently expected by late 2009. 

Information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ROSETTA RICHARDSON, CURTIS 

FORBES, JR., AND CYNTHIA DIAZ, 

Appellants, 

v.

Case No. 5D21-3038

LT Case No. 2020-CC-7304

LILY COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed November 1, 2022 

Appeal from the County Court 

for Orange County, 

Brian F. Duckworth, Judge.

La-Zondra C. Randolph, of Law Offices 

of La-Zondra C. Randolph, Orlando, for 

Appellants. 

Brooke R. Skaggs, of Warren &

Skaggs, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arif Karimjee, as Chief FinancialOfficer of Sopheon plc hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| (1) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                        |

 

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | By: /s/ ArifKarimjeeName: Arif KarimjeeTitle: Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: July 8, 2005

 
A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sopheon plc and will beretained by Sopheon Plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

  |
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04454

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04454\04454_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04454\04454_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04454\04454_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04454\04454_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04454\Certification Statement_04454.pdf Plant certification statement

04454\Supporting Documentation\04454_EPA Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04454\Supporting Documentation\04454_Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04454\Supporting Documentation\WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04454\04454_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04454\04454_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
No. IV-09-012 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

April 8, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2008 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

FOR FORT CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Omaha, Neb., on April 27, with 

representatives of Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) to discuss the agency=s 2008 assessment of 

safety performance for the Fort Calhoun nuclear plant. OPPD operates the plant, located about 20 

miles north of Omaha. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Mariott 

Hotel, 10220 Regency Circle, Omaha. 

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public on the safety performance of Fort Calhoun, as well as the NRC=s role in 

ensuring safe plant operation. 

 AThe NRC continually reviews the performance of Fort Calhoun and the nation=s other 

commercial nuclear power facilities,@ NRC Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said. AThis 

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance 

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.@

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the 

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/fcs_2008q4.pdf. 

The NRC said Fort Calhoun operated safely during 2008 and will continue to receive the 

very detailed inspection regime during 2009 used by the NRC for plants that are operating well. 

These inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant 

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 
Current performance information for Fort Calhoun is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FCS/fcs_chart.html. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### § 842.1101 Purpose.

This subpart contains regulations of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to supplement chapter 34 of title 22, United States Code, concerning FERS retirement service credit eligibility for satisfactory Peace Corps volunteer and volunteer leader service.
September 13, 2011

Mr. Steve Magginetti

Director of Maintenance

ACM Aviation Services

1162 Aviation Avenue San Jose, CA 95110-1143

Dear Mr. Magginetti:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 135.151 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your June 6, 2011, exemption request on behalf of ACM Aviation Services into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0690), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific paragraph or paragraphs of 14 CFR § 135.151 from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request, including the model of aircraft, whether you’ve actually taken delivery of the aircraft and if so, have you been operating without meeting the data link requirements.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we2

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
ENVIRONl\lENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

40 CFR Part 52
 

EPA-R08-0AR-2006-0013; FRL-


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; Redesignation
 

Request and Maintenance Plan for Salt Lake County; Utah County; Ogden City PMIO 

Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

l\CTIO!\: Prnposed rule: extension orthe comment period. 

Sl: \1\IARY: LPf\ is c.\tending the comment period Cor a document pLlblished on December I, 

.?O()9 (74 FR 6:27! 7). In the December L 200() document. E:P;\ proposed to disapprove the State 

i)f 1.:1ah·s requc's1S uncler the Clean Air Act to redesignate the Salt Lake County, lJtah County. 

and Ogden City PM]!) nonattainment areas to attainment. and to approve some and disapprove 

otbl:l' associated State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions. The Govemor of Utah submitted the 

redesignation requests and associated SIP revisions on September 2,2005. EPA proposed to 

disapprove the redesignation requests because the areas do not meet all Clean Air Act 

requirements for redesignation, At the request of several com111entors, EPA is extending the 

cumnwnt period through March 1. 20 In, 

DArES: ('omm('l1tc: mu~t ht;? received on or belore March 1. 20 j n. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments. ick~ntifiecl by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-0AR-2006­

uo 13. by one of the following methods: 

• \\\~~".':~"l.:guhni~}ll?,go~, Follow the nn-line instructions for submitting comments. 

• l'~-mai J: videtich.callic(~;)epa, gCl\' 

• Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT if you arc faxing comments). 

•	 !V1ail: Callie Videtich. Director. Air Program. Environmental Protection Agcnc.v 

(FP;\). Rcgi()11 R. \1:1ilcock gp-AR. 1595 Wynkoop St.. Denver. Colorado 80202­

1i 29. 

•	 Hand Delivery: Callie Videtich. Director, Air Program, Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR. 1595 Wynkoop St.. Denver, 

Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through Friday. 

8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.. excluding Federal holidays. Special arrangements should 

be made for de Ii veries of boxed information. 

• F'lr uddilional intlmnalion 011 submitting comments, see thl,.~ Decembl'f 1. 2009 

J.+ FR (2717) notice. 

FOR FVRTHER INFORMATION CO~TACT: Catherine Roberts. Air Program, Mail Code 

gP-AR.l:nvirollmcnw! Protect1on Agency (EPA.), Region 8. 1595 Wynkoop St.. Denver. 

fhted:	 Carol Rushin 

Acting Reg10nal Administrator 

Region 8 

2
#### § 335.105 Notice of job announcements to OPM.

Under 5 U.S.C. 3330, agencies are required to report job announcements to OPM for vacancies for which an agency will accept applications from outside the agency's work force. This requirement is implemented through part 330, subpart A of this chapter.

[66 FR 63906, Dec. 11, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 67605, Nov. 3, 2010]
#### Belle Balter, Respondent, v. Dennis Janis et al., Defendants, and Frances Zall et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

On Remand From Supreme Court of Tennessee May 27, 2003

TROY ALLEN THOMPSON v. ELISA CONNELL HULBERT

An Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County

No. L8261 A. V. McDowell, Judge 

No. W2003-01275-COA-RM-CV - Filed August 28, 2003

This case involves a constitutional challenge to the Tennessee Child Support Guidelines, Tenn.

Comp. R. & Regs. 1240-2-4. In our initial Opinion in this case, we held that the challenged

guidelines were unconstitutional because that they were violative of the equal protection guarantees

of the federal and state constitutions. The Supreme Court of Tennessee granted certiorari and

remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision

in Gallaher v. Elam, 104 S.W.3d 455 (Tenn. 2003). In light of Gallaher, we must conclude that

there is no constitutional defect in the challenged child support guideline provisions. Consequently,

we affirm the child support award ordered by the trial court.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Juvenile Court is Affirmed

HOLLY M. KIRBY,J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S.,

and DAVID R. FARMER, J., joined.

David A. McLaughlin and Gail R. Sevier, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Troy Allen

Thompson.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, and Kim Beals, Assistant Attorney General,

Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellee, State of Tennessee. 

OPINION

The Petitioner/Appellant Troy Thompson filed the original appeal in this action, claiming

that the Tennessee Child Support Guidelines, specifically Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1240-2-4, were

unconstitutional. In our initial Opinion in this case, we agreed with the Appellant and held that the

challenged guidelines were unconstitutional because they were violative of the equal protection

guarantees of the federal and state constitutions. Thompson v. Hulbert, No. W2000-02675-COAR3-JV, 2002 WL 1838131 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 9, 2002). The Supreme Court of Tennessee granted

certiorari and remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s

recent decision in Gallaher v. Elam, 104 S.W.3d 455 (Tenn. 2003). 
-2-

In Gallaher, the Tennessee Supreme Court held that the same guideline provisions at issue

in the instant case were constitutional, and that the challenged classifications had a reasonable

relationship to a legitimate state interest. Gallaher, 104 S.W.3d at 461-62. In light of that holding,

we must conclude that the trial court’s award of child support was appropriate, and we adopt its

determination as the Opinion of this Court. See Whiton v. Whiton, No. E2003-01279-COA-RMCV, 2003 WL 21516221 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2003).

The decision of the juvenile court is affirmed. Costs are to be taxed to the appellant, Troy

Allen Thompson, and his surety, for which execution may issue, if necessary. 

 

___________________________________ 

HOLLY M. KIRBY, JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

PAUL THOMAS WITMER,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 573 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1






BONANZA OIL & GAS, INC.


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


and Principal Financial Officer






I, William Wiseman, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o (d)) and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc.




/s/ William WisemanBy: William WisemanTitle:
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)




Date: September 21, 2009






I, Robert Teague, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o (d)) and that information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc.




/s/ Robert TeagueBy: Robert TeagueTitle:
Vice President (principal financial officer)




Date: September 21, 2009
#### Leon C. Weinstock, Respondent, v. Emanuel Hallenbeck and Marie Hallenbeck, Appellants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and diSv bursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. (See *Wiechers*v. *New Home Sewing Machine Co.,*38 App. Div. 1; *Heishon v. Knickerbocker*
      *967
      *Life Ins. Co.,*77 N. Y. 278; *People ex rel. Cecere*v. *Slocum,*161 App. Div. 733.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2066 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2066

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the allowance for 
 burial expenses of certain veterans buried in private or State-owned 
                              cemeteries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2003

  Ms. Waters introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the allowance for 
 burial expenses of certain veterans buried in private or State-owned 
                              cemeteries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE OF ALLOWANCE FOR THE PLOT ALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN 
              VETERANS BURIED IN PRIVATE OR STATE-OWNED CEMETERIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2303(b) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended in paragraphs (1) and (2) by striking ``$300'' and inserting 
``$1,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 5312(a) of such title is amended 
by striking ``and each rate of monthly allowance paid under section 
1805 of this title,'' and inserting ``each rate of monthly allowance 
paid under section 1805 of this title, and each rate of plot allowance 
provided for under section 2303(b) of this title,''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to deaths occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 316.914 Reporting requirement. ( a ) Not later than September 30 of each of the first three (3) fiscal years beginning after August 13, 2018, when 5 U.S.C. 3116 was enacted, an agency that makes an appointment under this subpart must submit a report to Congress and OPM on the impact of its use of the authority in this subpart during the fiscal year in which the report is submitted. OPM will provide written guidance describing the means by which agencies should collect this information, the timing of such collections, and the groups as to which information should be collected. The report must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The total number of individuals appointed by the agency under the authority in this subpart by position title, series, grade, and geographic location of the position, and type of appointment;
( 2 ) The number of individuals appointed under the authority in this subpart by the items identified in 5 U.S.C. 3116(h), and in OPM guidance;
( 3 ) The number of veterans appointed, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2108;
( 4 ) Any numerical limitation established by the agency in accordance with § 316.913;
( 5 ) The recruitment sources and methods used by the agency to fill positions;
( 6 ) The total number of individuals appointed by the agency during the applicable fiscal year to a position in the competitive service classified in a professional or administrative occupational category at the GS-11 level or below (or equivalent);
( 7 ) The number of individuals appointed under the authority that have been separated;
( 8 ) Information on difficulties encountered when using the authority; and
( 9 ) The number of employees converted to permanent positions under the authority in this subpart.
( b ) OPM may request additional information from agencies on their use of the authority in this subpart. An agency must include in its report to Congress and OPM any additional information required by OPM under this section.