Interim Decision #1909 

MATTER OF GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP. 

In Visa Petition Proceedings 

BIM—N-3448 

Decided by Regional Commissioner August 28, 1968 

Notwithstanding the petitioning corporation employs and has a continuing 

need for the services of electronic design engineers, petition is approved to 

accord 14 • electronic design engineers nonimmigrant classification under 

section 101 (a) (15) (H) (ii), Immigration and Nationality Act, since they 

are coming to perform "temporary services" within the meaning of that 

section where their activity in the field of electronic design engineering 

will be limited to design work on special testing equipment during a 

critical peak production situation of not more than 6 months duration. 

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Joseph F. Shramek, Esquire 

General Dynamics Corp. 

Electronics Division 

1400 North Goodman Street 

Rochester, New York 14601 

This matter is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal 

from the decision of the District Director at Buffalo, New York 

denying, the petitioner's request for the services of fourteen electronic design engineers. 

The petitioning organization is one of the operating units of 

General Dynamics and is engaged in the manufacture of military 

electronics communications equipment. It desires to employ fourteen electronic design engineers of various nationalities for a period of six months. These prospective beneficiaries are presently 

residing in the Montreal area and are, or have been until recently, employed by Canadair, a Canadian subsidiary of the parent concern of the petitioning organization. The remuneration offered is $98.00 per forty-hour workweek, plus a per diem 

allowance for living expenses of $14.00. No provision is made in 

the petition or labor certification for overtime employment. The 

certification of the Bureau of Employment Security provides for 

thirty positions for the period of time between June 17, 1968 and 

December 17, 1968. It identifies the work on which the beneficiar23 
Interim Decision #1909 

ies' services will be employed as the design of automatic electronic test equipment. 

In the appeal brief and the oral argument offered in support of 

this appeal the petitioning organization, through counsel, has furnished supplemental information which discloses that the 

prospective beneficiaries have no interest in immigrating to this 

country and that the services of the beneficiaries will be temporarily utilized by the petitioner in the design of special equipment 

which is called for under two of the several contracts entered into 

by the Air Force for the development of the F-111 military 

plane. The beneficiaries of this petition, according to the supplemental information furnished by counsel, will be employees of 

Canadair and will be paid in Canadian funds at their usual rate 

of pay under their agreement with Canadair. It is counsel's belief 

that there will be a monthly inter-divisional accounting for the 

dollars expended by Canadair and that Canadair will be reimbursed by the Electronics Division of General Dynamics in Rochester, New York. These employees will be, according to counsel's 

statement, working on the maintenance and support systems 

which are prime units for the production of ground support systems which are prime units for the production of ground support 

equipment, test stations, etc. for this plane. Counsel further contended that a peak production situation exists which involves 

critical military procurement related to the F-111 program. 

The pertinent portions of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

which provide for petitions of this type are as follows: 

Section 101. (a) As used in this Act- 

* * * a * 

(15) The term "immigrant" means every alien except an alien who is 

within ono of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens- 

* a a a * 

(H) an alien having a residence in a foreign country which he has 

no intention of abandoning- 

* * * * * 

(ii) who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform 

other temporary services or labor, if unemployed persons capable 

of performing such service or labor cannot be found in this country; 

In determining whether or not the positions for which the beneficiaries' services are desired are of a temporary or permanent 

nature certain guidelines have been developed. (Matter of 

M—S—H—, 8 I. & N. Dec. 460, Matter of Contopoulos, 10 L & N. 

Dec. 654, and Matter of Kowarski, 12 I. & N. Dec. 571). 

While it is important to know whether the positions are included within the petitioner's regular business operations, it is 

24 
Interim Decision #1909 

more important to ascertain whether the specific services which 

the beneficiaries will provide are needed for a temporary period 

or on a continuing basis. In the instant proceeding, the petitioner 

employs a number of electronic design engineers. He has a; continuing need for the services of these engineers but the need for 

the beneficiaries covered by this petition is of a different nature 

and is for the very limited period of time of not more than six 

months. While they will be working in the same field of activity, 

their work will be limited to design work on special testing equipment during a critical peak production situation. The duration of 

their employment and the work which will be assigned to them 

will be on a phase of the project which, by necessity, must be 

completed within the duration of their stay in the United States. 

Their services are wanted for a temporary period of time and not 

on a continuing basis. 

From the evidence of record, including the supplemental information furnished by counsel in his brief and during oral argument, it is concluded that the beneficiaries of this petition have 

residences in a foreign country which they have no intention of 

abandoning; that they will be coming to the United States temporarily to perform temporary services as electronic design engineers; and, that unemployed persons capable of performing such 

services cannot be found in this country. 

It is ordered that this appeal be and the same is hereby sustained. 

/1 is further ordered that the petition be and the same is 

hereby granted. 

25