alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1909

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to provide for inflation adjustments to the mandatory jurisdiction thresholds of the National Labor 

Relations Board. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mr. ISTOOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to provide for 

inflation adjustments to the mandatory jurisdiction 

thresholds of the National Labor Relations Board.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS TO MANDATORY JU4 RISDICTION THRESHOLDS OF NATIONAL 

5 LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. 

6 Section 14(c)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act 

7 (29 U.S.C. 164(c)(1)) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(c)(1)(A) MANDATORY JURISDICTION.—The Board 

9 shall assert jurisdiction over any labor dispute involving 
2

•HR 1909 IH 

1 any class or category of employers over which it would 

2 assert jurisdiction under the standards prevailing on Au3 gust 1, 1959, with the financial threshold amounts ad4 justed for inflation under subparagraph (B). 

5 ‘‘(B) INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.—The Board, begin6 ning on October 1, 2003, and not less often than every 

7 5 years thereafter, shall adjust each of the financial 

8 threshold amounts referred to in subparagraph (A) for in9 flation, using as the base period the later of (i) the most 

10 recent calendar quarter ending before the financial thresh11 old amount was established, or (ii) the calendar quarter 

12 ending June 30, 1959. The inflation adjustments shall be 

13 determined using changes in the Consumer Price Index 

14 for all urban consumers published by the Department of 

15 Labor and shall be rounded to the nearest $10,000. The 

16 Board shall prescribe any regulations necessary for mak17 ing the inflation adjustments.’’.

Æ
No. I-07-067 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

December 17, 2007

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO INDIAN POINT UNIT 3 

Anthony Koonce has been assigned as the new Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident 

Inspector at Indian Point Unit 3. He joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Paul Cataldo at the 

nuclear plant in Buchanan, N.Y. Two resident inspectors are also assigned to Indian Point 2. 

Both Indian Point units are operated by Entergy Nuclear. 

“Tony Koonce’s technical and regulatory experience will assist the NRC in carrying out 

its mission of protecting people and the environment and ensuring the safe operation of Indian 

Point 3,” said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

Koonce joined the NRC in August 2006 as a reactor engineer in Region III. Prior to 

joining the agency, Koonce served in the United States Navy for nine years. 

He earned a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering and engineering physics from 

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., and a master’s degree in nuclear science and 

engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve 

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work 

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Indian Point 3 resident inspectors can be reached at 914/739-9360. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LARRY D. WEATHERS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 13

- 1234

[ June 24, 2015 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 562001CF000525A

.

Larry D. Weathers, Milton, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Catherine Linton, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C U RIAM

.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to set aside or correct illegal sentence and remand this matter for further proceedings

consistent with Falcon v. State

, 40 Fla. L. Weekly S151 (Fla. Mar. 19, 2015), and Horsley v. State

, 160 So. 3d 393 (Fla. 2015).

D AMOORGIAN

, C.J., S TEVENSON and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 839.1002 Will OPM compute the lost earnings if my qualifying retirement coverage error was previously corrected and I made TSP make-up contributions?

If you made contributions to the TSP after your qualifying retirement coverage error was previously corrected, OPM will compute the lost earnings on your make-up contributions to the TSP under the following circumstances:

| You were in: | And were previously corrected to: | And under these rules you elect: |
| --- | --- | --- |
| CSRS | FERS | FERS. |
| CSRS Offset | FERS | |
| Social Security-Only | FERS | No election required. |
| Social Security-Only | CSRS | |
| Social Security-Only | CSRS Offset | |
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-16427

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:03-cr-20102-CMA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KELVIN PACE, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

No. 16-16429

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:16-cv-21794-CMA,

1:03-cr-20102-CMA-1

KELVIN PACE, 

Case: 16-16427 Date Filed: 09/29/2017 Page: 1 of 3 
2

 Petitioner-Appellee,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(September 29, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

The Government appeals the district court’s grant of Kelvin Pace’s motion 

to vacate sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pace had been sentenced to 235 months’ 

imprisonment under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). 

The Government asserts the district court erred by concluding Pace lacked a

sufficient number of predicate “violent felonies” in light of Johnson v. United 

States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). After review,1 we reverse and remand to the 

district court. 

 1 In a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding we review a district court’s findings of fact for clear 

error, and its legal conclusions de novo. Garcia v. United States, 278 F.3d 1210, 1212 (11th Cir. 

2002).

Case: 16-16427 Date Filed: 09/29/2017 Page: 2 of 3 
3

Pace contends the cases cited by the Government are unpersuasive. We do 

not agree. Following close review, we conclude our binding precedent counsels in 

favor of reversal and remand because, in light of his convictions for Florida 

robbery pursuant to Florida Statue § 812.13, Pace has a sufficient number of 

predicate “violent felonies” to support an armed career criminal designation under 

the ACCA. See United States v. Fritts, 841 F.3d 937 (11th Cir. 2016); United 

States v. Lockley, 632 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2011); United States v. Dowd, 451 F.3d 

1244 (11th Cir. 2006). The district court’s amended judgment is VACATED. The 

district court’s order granting Pace’s motion to vacate sentence is REVERSED. 

We REMAND to the district court for reinstatement of its original judgment and 

further action consistent with this opinion.

Case: 16-16427 Date Filed: 09/29/2017 Page: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2075 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2075

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, as the 
             ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1905 
West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 724.201 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart implements Title II of the Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 concerning the obligation of Federal agencies to notify all employees, former employees, and applicants for Federal employment of the rights and protections available to them under the Federal Antidiscrimination Laws and Whistleblower Protection Laws. This subpart also implements Title II concerning the obligation of agencies to train their employees on such rights and remedies. The regulations describe agency obligations and the procedures for written notification and training.
( b ) Pursuant to section 205 of the No FEAR Act, neither that Act nor this notice creates, expands or reduces any rights otherwise available to any employee, former employee or applicant under the laws of the United States, including the provisions of law specified in 5 U.S.C. 2302(d).
### §748a. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(11), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165

Section, act May 13, 1938, ch. 215, §2, 52 Stat. 353; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §2(a), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1432; Pub. L. 89–670, §6(b)(1), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 938, related to transportation expenses for school children of lighthouse keepers.
Summary of Compensation for



Exhibit 10.42



Description of Compensation and Benefits for Directors



 
1.  Cash Compensation of UAL Non-employee Directors.  Non-employee directors receive an $18,000 annual retainer, $900 per meeting attended, and $2,700 per year for chairing certain Board committees.


2.  Flight Benefits for Directors.  Generally, directors, their spouses and their dependent children are entitled to complimentary positive space travel on United Airlines and United Express for pleasure or UAL business travel, and will be reimbursed annually for the income tax liability incurred in using this privilege.


3.  Complimentary Cargo Carriage Policy for Directors.  Directors receive complimentary cargo carriage (excludes ground transportation) for personal goods on United Airlines, for up to 2,500 pounds per year, and are reimbursed for the related income tax liability.


4.  Stock-Based Compensation of UAL Non-employee Directors.  Under the Corporation's 1995 Directors Plan, non-employee directors have typically received 400 shares of UAL common stock on the first business day of January each year and 189 deferred stock units on December 31 of each year.  The Plan permits cash compensation to be taken in stock, as well as the deferral of receipt of cash or stock compensation for tax purposes.  However, in 2003 the Nominating/Governance Committee determined not to issue the 189 deferred stock units and the 400 shares issuable in January 2004.


5.  Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance and Indemnification.  The Company has a policy which provides liability insurance for directors and officers of UAL and its subsidiaries.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, George Burnett, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media East LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. November 10, 2004 By:
    /s/ George BurnettGeorge BurnettPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      I, Richard P. Underwood, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Technol Fuel
      Conditioners, Inc.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
      statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report.

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows
      of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report.

      By: /s/ Richard P. Underwood                        Date: December 5, 2005
          ------------------------
      Richard P. Underwood
      Chief Executive Officer,
      President & Chairman

                                        1
§ 532.413 Simultaneous action. ( a ) If an employee becomes entitled to more than one pay change at the same time, the employing agency shall process the pay changes in the order which will provide the maximum benefit, except as required by paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) If an employee becomes entitled to an increase in pay and subject to a personnel or appointment change at the same time, the increased rate of pay is deemed to be the employee's existing scheduled rate of pay when the personnel or appointment change is processed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.



Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the
Companies)



Written Statement by Chief
Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-K annual
report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|                                
|/s/ Leonard A. Campanaro        
|                                
|Leonard A. Campanaro            
|Chief Financial Officer         
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and    
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.



Dated: March 4, 2004
B.C.D. 15-05 March 26, 2015

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Mississippi Rail Group, Inc.

d/b/a Kosciusko & Southwestern Railway

(MRGI)

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of Mississippi Rail Group, Inc. d/b/a Kosciusko &

Southwestern Railway (MRGI) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seep) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et sec;.) (collectively, the “Acts”).

MRGI (B.A. # 5576) has been an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act since May 1, 2000, the date

from which MRGI was found to have first commenced freight railroad

operations as found in Board Notice 00-28 dated July 13, 2000.

The latest coverage information in the file for MRGI was provided by Don

Brown, the retired President and majority stockholder for MRGI. He served

a letter dated April 8, 2014, on the Board’s Audit and Compliance Division

which provided details and documentation of MRGI’s sale of all assets and

indicated that at that time the company had not yet been dissolved.

Information in the file indicates that MRGI operated over a 21.4 mile line of

track leased from the state of Mississippi. According to information from 

Mr. Brown, MRGI last operated a train over the line of track on August 19,

2008 and employees were last compensated in July of 2011. MRGI filed

Articles of Dissolution with the State of Mississippi effective with the date

of filing, September 5, 2014.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR 202.11) ofthe Board’s regulations states that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate

whenever such company or person loses any of the characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status.

Information in our coverage files indicates that MRGI was formed to operate

approximately 21.4 miles oftrack from Aberdeen, Mississippi to Kosciusko,

Mississippi. MRGI began freight rail operations on May 1, 2000. The

evidence of record establishes that MRGI has not operated as a railroad

carrier and does not retain the ability to do so since the sale of assets and the

BA # 5576
2

subsequent filing of the Articles of Dissolution on September 5, 2014.

MRGI has not functioned as a rail carrier since that date and no longer

possesses the characteristics of a railroad carrier employer.

The Board therefore finds that effective September 5, 2014, the date that

MRGI was dissolved as a corporation in the State ofMississippi, Mississippi

Rail Group, Inc. d/b/a Kosciusko & Southwestern Railway ceased being a

covered employer under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Acts.

FOR THE BOARD

Martha P. Rico

Secretary to the Board
### **CHAPTER 2003—SONS OF UNION VETERANS OF THE CIVIL WAR**

Sec.
200301.
Organization.
200302.
Purposes.
200303.
Membership.
200304.
Governing body.
200305.
Powers.
200306.
Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges.
200307.
Restrictions.
200308.
Principal office.
200309.
Records and inspection.
200310.
Service of process.
200311.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
200312.
Annual report.
200313.
Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation.
### §152402. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are to—

(1) encourage, accept, and administer private gifts to promote and ensure the preservation and public accessibility of the nation's sound recording heritage held at the Library of Congress and other public and nonprofit archives throughout the United States; and

(2) further the goals of the Library of Congress and the National Recording Preservation Board in connection with their activities under the National Recording Preservation Act of 2000.

(Added Pub. L. 106–474, title II, §201(a), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2092.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Recording Preservation Act of 2000, referred to in par. (2), is Pub. L. 106–474, Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2085, which enacted this chapter and chapter 27 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 2, The Congress. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of Title 2 and Tables.
### §21305. Grant increase

The amount of the increase provided to a State under the covered formula grants under this chapter shall be equal to not more than 10 percent of the average of the total amount of funding provided to the State under the covered formula grants under the 3 most recent awards to the State.

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IV, §406, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043h–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### Part D—Police Recruitment
### §12572. Allotment

From amounts appropriated under section 14119 of title 42, the Director shall allot—

(1) 80 percent of such amounts to States on the basis of the number of law enforcement officers in each State compared to the number of law enforcement officers in all States; and

(2) 20 percent of such amounts to States on the basis of the shortage of law enforcement personnel and the need for assistance under this part in the State compared to the shortage of law enforcement personnel and the need for assistance under this part in all States.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XX, §200203, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2058.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 14119 of title 42, referred to in text, was omitted from the Code as obsolete.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14112 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.