alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 536.202 Optional grade retention. ( a ) Subject to the requirements in §§ 536.102 and 536.203, an authorized agency official may provide grade retention to an employee moving from a position under a covered pay system to a lower-graded position under a covered pay system when— ( 1 ) Management announces a reorganization or reclassification decision in writing (including a general notice or a specific notice) that may or would affect the employee; and
( 2 ) The employee moves to a lower-graded position (either at the employee's initiative or in response to a management-initiated offer) on or before the date the announced reorganization or reclassification is effected.
( b ) An agency must apply § 536.105 in determining whether a position under a different covered pay system is a lower-graded position.
( c ) When an employee is offered a position with grade retention under this section in anticipation of a reduction in grade, the agency must inform the employee in writing that acceptance of the position is not required and that declination of the offer will not affect the employee's entitlement to grade retention under § 536.201 if the agency actually moves the employee to the lower-graded position.
[70 FR 31305, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 66155, Nov. 7, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2130 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2130

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 121 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, as the ``New Bridge 
                         Landing Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 121 
Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jersey, and known as the North 
Hackensack Station Post Office, shall be known and designated as the 
``New Bridge Landing Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``New Bridge Landing Post 
Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Achim Stamm, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aqua Society, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Achim Stamm                       
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| |        |                                       
| | Name:  | ACHIM STAMM                           
| |        |                                       
| | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer               
| |        |                                       
| | Date:  | August 22, 2005                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2055

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment in the number 

of free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2003

Mr. JONES of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To amend Public Law 89–366 to allow for an adjustment 

in the number of free roaming horses permitted in Cape 

Lookout National Seashore.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN THE NUMBER OF FREE ROAM4 ING HORSES PERMITTED IN CAPE LOOKOUT 

5 NATIONAL SEASHORE, NC. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first subsection (b) of section 

7 5 of Public Law 89–366 (16 U.S.C. 459g–4) is amend8 ed—

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘100 free 

10 roaming horses’’ and inserting ‘‘not less than 110 
2

•HR 2055 IH 

1 free roaming horses, with a target population of be2 tween 120 and 130 free roaming horses,’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

4 (B) and inserting the following new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a 

6 plan to maintain the viability of the herd; or’’; and 

7 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘100’’ and in8 serting ‘‘110’’. 

9 (b) REPEAL OF DUPLICATE SUBSECTIONS.—Section 

10 5 of Public Law 89–366 is amended—

11 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a)’’ after 

12 ‘‘(a)’’; and 

13 (2) by striking the second subsection (b).

Æ
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT: 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM 

FOR COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL 

EQUIPMENT: 

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION TRANSFORMERS 

September 2007 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 196
This document was prepared for the Department of Energy 

by staff members of 

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

and 

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

 EE-RM/STD-00-550 COMMENT 196
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively,
of Nortek, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify that to their
knowledge:





1.
            the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year quarter June 28, 2008
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the fiscal quarter ended June 28, 2008 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/ Richard L.
Bready


Name: Richard L.
Bready


Title:    President
and Chief Executive Officer











/s/ Almon C.
Hall


Name:Almon C. Hall


Title:VicePresident and ChiefFinancialOfficer
#### LAUREL COUNTY, Movant, v. William REAMS, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 12, 1945.

C. R. Luker for movant.

H. C. Clay and R. B. Johnson opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Motions for appeal from judgment of Laurel circuit court in favor of movant for $250 on contract, denied. Judgment affirmed on appeal and cross appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Dated this 27th day of February, 2004.


      /s/ Albert R. Rietheimer
-------------------------------------
Albert R. Rietheimer
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45894

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

WILLIAM KARYIM HAMMOND
,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: October 22, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twelve years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly A. Coster

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

William Karyim Hammond pled guilty to discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle

, Idaho Code § 18

- 3317 . The district court imposed a unified sentence of twelve years, with a

minimum period of confinement of five years , and retained jurisdiction

. Hammond appeals,

contending that his sentence is excessive and that the district court abused its discretion by

retaining jurisdiction rather than granting his request for probation

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating th e reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hammond ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### Ada C. Lorenz, Respondent, v. Samuel Lorenz, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2131

To award a congressional gold medal to President Jose Maria Aznar of 

Spain. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2003

Mr. GIBBONS (for himself, Mr. REYES, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. 

ENGLISH, Mr. WYNN, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To award a congressional gold medal to President Jose Maria 

Aznar of Spain.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDING. 

4 The Congress finds that President Jose Maria Aznar 

5 of Spain has—

6 (1) clearly demonstrated, during a very trying 

7 and historic time for our two nations, as well as for 

8 all other peaceful and free nations, that he is a 

9 staunch and steadfast ally of the United States of 

10 America; 
2

•HR 2131 IH 

1 (2) recognized the threat of terrorism to the se2 curity of the world; and 

3 (3) steadfastly provided support to fight ter4 rorism throughout the world. 

5 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL. 

6 (a) PRESENTATION AUTHORIZED.—The Speaker of 

7 the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tem8 pore of the Senate shall make appropriate arrangements 

9 for the presentation, on behalf of the Congress, of a gold 

10 medal of appropriate design, to President Jose Maria 

11 Aznar, in recognition of his outstanding and enduring con12 tributions to maintaining the security of all freedom-loving 

13 nations. 

14 (b) DESIGN AND STRIKING.—For purposes of the 

15 presentation referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary 

16 of the Treasury (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Sec17 retary’’) shall strike a gold medal with suitable emblems, 

18 devices, and inscriptions to be determined by the Sec19 retary. 

20 SEC. 3. DUPLICATE MEDALS. 

21 The Secretary may strike and sell duplicates in 

22 bronze of the gold medal struck pursuant to section 2 

23 under such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, at 

24 a price sufficient to cover the cost thereof, including labor, 
3

•HR 2131 IH 

1 materials, dies, use of machinery, and overhead expenses, 

2 and the cost of the gold medal. 

3 SEC. 4. STATUS OF MEDALS. 

4 (a) NATIONAL MEDALS.—The medals struck pursu5 ant to this Act are national medals for purposes of chapter 

6 51 of title 31, United States Code. 

7 (b) NUMISMATIC ITEMS.—For purposes of section 

8 5134 of title 31, United States Code, all medals struck 

9 under this Act shall be considered to be numismatic items. 

10 SEC. 5. AUTHORITY TO USE FUND AMOUNTS; PROCEEDS OF 

11 SALE. 

12 (a) AUTHORITY TO USE FUND AMOUNTS.—There is 

13 authorized to be charged against the United States Mint 

14 Public Enterprise Fund such amounts as may be nec15 essary to pay for the costs of the medals struck pursuant 

16 to this Act. 

17 (b) PROCEEDS OF SALE.—Amounts received from the 

18 sale of duplicate bronze medals authorized under section 

19 3 shall be deposited into the United States Mint Public 

20 Enterprise Fund.

Æ
No. II-09-017 April 3, 2009 

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4416 

NRC SCHEDULES OPEN HOUSE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ON 

2008 PERFORMANCE OF SUMMER NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled an open house for Monday, 

April 13, and will be available to discuss and answer questions about the agency’s assessment of 

safety performance during 2008 at the Summer nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by 

SCE&G, is located near Jenkinsville, S.C., about 26 miles northwest of Columbia. 

The open house is informal and scheduled to run from 5-6 p.m. at McCrorey-Liston 

Elementary School, 1978 State Highway 215 South in Blair, S.C. During the open house, NRC staff 

will be available to answer questions on the safety performance of the Summer plant last year, as 

well as the NRC role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

“Throughout the year, we inspect and review the performance of the Summer plant and all 

commercial nuclear plants,” NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes said. “We issue several 

inspection reports during the year and an overall annual assessment. This open house allows us to 

discuss that assessment with local officials and people near the plant, and answer any questions they 

may have.” 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the 

NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/sum_2008q4.pdf. 

The NRC found that the Summer plant’s 2008 performance met all NRC safety objectives. 

This year, the NRC plans to continue to conduct the very detailed inspections required at those 

plants operating well. In addition, the agency will complete some generic inspections related to 

operator licensing examinations, ground water protection and reactor cooling system welds at 

Summer in 2009. 

Performance at Summer during all of 2008 was at a level that resulted in no additional NRC 

oversight. 

Current performance information for Summer Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site at: 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUM/sum_chart.html. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §4101. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Administration

The term "Administration" means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

#### (2) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

#### (3) Cooperative activities of the Administration

The terms 1 "cooperative activities of the Administration" means cooperative activities between the Administration and an external entity, such as the Cooperative Institutes, Sea Grant Colleges, National Estuarine Research Reserves, the National Oceanographic Partnership Program established under chapter 665 of title 10, and regional associations of the Integrated Ocean Observing System.

#### (4) Data specifications

The term "data specifications" shall refer to the type, resolution, periodicity, and quality of data required by an program of the Administration.

#### (5) Test or training range

#### (A) In general

The term "test or training range" means an area designated for operating unmanned maritime systems and other types of systems for the purpose of—

(i) evaluating the performance of such systems; or

(ii) training personnel on operating procedures for such systems.

#### (B) Inclusions

The term "test or training range" may include specialized fixed or portable instrumentation for the operation of unmanned maritime systems and other types of systems.

#### (6) Unmanned maritime systems

#### (A) In general

The term "unmanned maritime systems" means remotely operated or autonomous vehicles produced by the commercial sector—

(i) designed to function without an on-board human presence; and

(ii) that may include associated components such as control and communications, instrumentation, data transmission, and processing systems.

#### (B) Examples

The term "unmanned maritime systems" includes the following:

(i) Unmanned undersea vehicles.

(ii) Unmanned surface vehicles.

(iii) Autonomous underwater vehicles.

(iv) Autonomous surface vehicles.

#### (C) Treatment of aerial vehicles

The term "unmanned maritime systems" includes unmanned aerial vehicles and autonomous aerial vehicles that are used to address maritime issues to the extent the Administrator determines it is necessary and appropriate to achieve the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 115–394, §2, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5281.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 115–394, §1(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5281, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Commercial Engagement Through Ocean Technology Act of 2018' or the 'CENOTE Act of 2018'."

1 So in original. Probably should be "term".
#### UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA and United Mine Workers of America, District 28, Appellants, v. C. C. LAMBERT, C. H. Lambert, M. G. Lambert and Elmer Lambert, Partners d/b/a Low Gap Coal Company, Appellees.

No. 6798.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 15, 1954.

Decided July 16, 1954.

Stuart B. Campbell, Wytheville, Va., and Harrison Combs, Washington, D. C. (Stuart B. Campbell, Jr., Wytheville, Va., on brief), for appellants.

Robert T. Winston, Jr., and Fred B. Greear, Norton, Va. (Greear, Bowen, Mullins & Winston, Norton, Va., on brief), for appellees.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $100,000 actual damages and $50,000 punitive damages in an action brought in the court below under the provisions of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq. The questions involved are substantially the same as those which were before us in United Mine Workers v. Patton, 4 Cir., 211 F.2d 742, a companion case arising out of the same labor controversy and tried before the same judge. The case now before us was tried before our opinion in that case was handed down. We hold, as in that case, that there was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury, that punitive damages were not recoverable and that there was the same prejudicial error in the charge of the court on the issue of actual damages. There is some difference in the nature of the evidentia-ry questions presented, but it is not necessary to go into these as they will probably not arise on the rehearing of the case in the light of what we had occasion to say in the opinion in the Patton case. On the basis of our opinion in that case, the judgment appealed from will be reversed and the case will be remanded for a new trial.

Reversed.
### subpart 2—reentry research