alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.3



I, Michael D. Lockhart, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 2, 2004



/s/    Michael D. LockhartMichael D. LockhartChief Executive Officer
### §11242. Grants for technical assistance and training

The Secretary may make grants to statewide and regional nonprofit organizations (and combinations of such organizations) to provide technical assistance and training to public and private entities (and combinations of such entities) that are eligible to receive grants under this subchapter, for the purpose of carrying out the programs, projects, or activities for which such grants are made.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title III, §342, as added Pub. L. 102–586, §3(g)(1)(C), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5023.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5714–22 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 342 of Pub. L. 93–415 was renumbered section 381 and is classified to section 11272 of this title.
B.C.D. 02-29 APR 0 2 2002

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Beaufort & Morehead Railway, Inc.

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of 

Beaufort & Morehead Railway, Inc., as an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351 et seq.).

The Beaufort & Morehead was held to be an employer under the Acts effective 

February 4, 1991, when it assumed operation of approximately three miles ofrail

line between Morehead City and Beaufort, North Carolina. On March 7, 2000, the

North Carolina Ports Railway Commission (Railway Commission) reported that 

the Surface Transportation Board had approved the acquisition ofthe lease and

operation ofthe railway line by the Railway Commission. See: North Carolina 

Ports Railway Commission d/b/a Beaufort & Morehead Railway-Acquisition and

Operation Exemption-Beaufort & Morehead Railway. Inc.. STB Finance Docket 

No. 33826, 64 Fed. Reg. 67619, December 2, 1999. Accordingly, the Board held

the Railway Commission to be a reactivated employer (B.A. No. 4560) effective 

January 1, 2000, and terminated the coverage under the Acts ofthe Beaufort &

Morehead effective December 31, 1999 (B.C.D. 00-41).

The Beaufort & Morehead filed a notice of exemption to re-acquire and operate the

rail line which had been previously transferred to the Railway Commission. See:

Beaufort & Morehead Railway-Acquisition and Operation Exemption- North

Carolina Ports Railway Commission d/b/a Beaufort & Morehead Railway. Inc..

STB Finance Docket No. 34151, 67 Fed. Reg. 2729, January 11, 2002.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe

Surface Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49,

United States Code;

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition, as does section 3231

ofthe Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

BA# 4560
-2-

Beaufort & Morehead Railway, Inc.

The evidence ofrecord establishes that the Beaufort & Morehead is again a rail

carrier operating in interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that the 

Beaufort & Morehead is an employer within the meaning of section l(a)(l)(i) of

the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(l)(i)) and the corresponding

provision ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act as of December 28, 2001, 

the date as of which it was scheduled to re-acquire the rail line’.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

1 The continued status ofNorth Carolina Ports Railway Commission under the Acts is currently being examined by

the Board’s Office of Audit and Compliance.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EdwardM. Krell, Chief Operating Officer & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| **/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL**                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward M. Krell                                         |
| *Chief Operating Officer  &Chief Financial Officer* |
| August 7, 2007                                          |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 1527—NATIONAL SKI PATROL SYSTEM, INCORPORATED**

Sec.
152701.
Definition.
152702.
Organization.
152703.
Purposes.
152704.
Membership.
152705.
Governing body.
152706.
Powers.
152707.
Restrictions.
152708.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
152709.
Records and inspection.
152710.
Service of process.
152711.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
152712.
Annual report.
No. 07-096 August 1, 2007

NRC RECEIVES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, EXTENDS REVIEW FOR VERMONT YANKEE LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is revising its schedule for issuing a SafetyEvaluation Report (SER) for the license renewal application from the Vermont Yankee nuclear powerplant, about 5 miles south of Brattleboro, Vt.

The NRC staff’s inspections and ongoing review of the application have led plant operatorEntergy Nuclear Northeast to add information on more than two dozen systems to those alreadycovered by a preliminary SER. Because of this late change to the renewal application, NRC staff willnot issue a complete SER on Aug. 1 as initially scheduled.

“This change will add at least two months to the review,” said Jim Dyer, Director of the NRC’sOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “We’ll set a formal new schedule for completing our work andreaching an overall decision on Vermont Yankee’s license renewal after we receive all of Entergy’sadditional information.”

Entergy filed the renewal application on Jan. 27, 2006, and if approved, Vermont Yankee’slicense would be extended 20 years. The plant’s current license expires March 21, 2012. The NRC staffexpects to issue a final Environmental Impact Statement on the renewal application in the near future.In addition to the staff’s work, the NRC’s independent Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguardsmust issue a report on the application, and an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel must concludea hearing on the application before the staff can reach a final conclusion on renewing the plant’slicense. More information on the review is available on the NRC’s Web site at:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/vermont-yankee.html.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

132180 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. RONALD G. HAAER and DAWN L. RHODES, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Justices

v SC: 132180 COA: 260001 Ingham CC: 03-001767-CZ VREBA-HOFF DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., VREBA-HOFF HOLDINGS, L.L.C., VAN BAKEL EXPLOITATI EMIJ B. V., JOHN VANDER HOFF, WILHEL M VAN BAKEL, and MENNO WAGLER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
### §§739 to 740b. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section 739, R.S. §4668, related to substitution of lighthouses for lightships.

Section 740, acts Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 81, §5, 38 Stat. 927; Aug. 28, 1916, ch. 414, §3, 39 Stat. 538; June 20, 1918, ch. 103, §5, 40 Stat. 608; June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 927, related to post-lantern lights on particular waters.

Section 740a, act May 22, 1926, ch. 371, §6, 44 Stat. 626, related to post-lantern lights on Allegheny and Rock Rivers.

Section 740b, acts June 23, 1874, ch. 455, §1, 18 Stat. 220; June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538, related to lights and buoys on Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri Rivers.

Sections covered by section 541 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2      Section 906 Certification of CFO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill
Moses, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By: /s/ Merrill Moses
    ----------------------------
Merrill Moses
President and CFO
February 15, 2005
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 24, 2022

NO. 03-20-00231-CR

Wesley Eugene Perkins, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 8 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Appellant shall 

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
|  |
|--|
| Home |  Advanced Search |  Directory |  Site Map |  Privacy Policy |  Accessibility |  Contact Us                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| About  Our Work  Career Opportunities  Business With Us  Information Resources  Outreach |
|  

LIBRARY

VOLPE JOURNAL

HIGHLIGHTS

PUBLISHED AND PRESENTED

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

TRANSPORTATIONSTRATEGIC PLANS

LINKS                  |  

National Science and Technology Council
Partnership to Promote Enhanced Freight Movement at Ports and Intermodal TerminalsA Strategic Plan
Committee on TechnologySubcommittee on Transportation Research and Development

**February 2000**
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
- Introduction  
Opportunities and Challenges
Investment Strategies
- Implementation   Appendix ACase Studies  Appendix BAcronyms  Return to Top    
Prepared byUnited States Department of TransportationResearch and Special Programs AdministrationJohn A. Volpe National Transportation Systems CenterTransportation Strategic Planning and Analysis Office55 BroadwayCambridge, Massachusetts 021432
                U.S. Department of Transportation
Research and Special Programs Administration 
  |
#### Otto Brehm Inc., Appellant, v. William Brewster, Defendant, and Ben Brustowsky, Copartners Doing Business under the Name of *“*Brewster’s Bakery ”, Respondent.

*592No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
---

Exhibit 1.6

|Province of British Columbia
|----------------------------
|                            
|FORM 19                     
|                            
|(Section 348)               
|                            
|COMPANY ACT                 
|                            
|SPECIAL RESOLUTION          

| | Certificate of    |       
| | ----------------- | ------
| | Incorporation No. | 210187

The following special resolution was passed by
  the undermentioned Company on the date stated:

|Name of Company:        | TERYL RESOURCES CORP.
|----------------------- | ---------------------
|                        |                      
|Date resolution passed: | November 20, 2000    

Special Resolution:

BE IT RESOLVED that
  the authorized capital of the Company be increased from 30,000,000 common shares
  without par value to 100,000,000 common shares without par value.

(Altered Memorandum attached)

CERTIFIEDa true copy the 25th
  day of November, 2002.

| | /s/
      John Robertson     
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | John Robertson, President and
| | Secretary                    

---

|SCHEDULE A                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|COMPANY ACT                                                      
|                                                                 
|FORM 1                                                           
|                                                                 
|ALTERED MEMORANDUM                                               
|                                                                 
|(as altered by Special Resolution passed November
      20, 2000)

I wish to be formed in to a company with limited
  liability under the British Columbia Company Act in pursuance of this
  Memorandum.

|1. | The name of the Company is
        TERYL RESOURCES CORP.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                           
|2. | The authorized capital of the
        Company consists of:
|   |                                                           
|   | a.                                                        
|   | b.                                                        

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Adherex Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, Rostislav Raykov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert Andrade, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  February
4, 2011




By:
                /s/
      Rostislav
      RaykovRostislav
      RaykovChief
      Executive Officer




Date:  February
4, 2011




By:
                  /s/
      Robert
      AndradeRobert
      AndradeChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vanessa Avila, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 27, 2005

/s/ Vanessa Avila	Vanessa Avila
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Jacob P. Galewitz, Deceased. President and Directors of Manhattan Company et al., as Executors of Jacob P. Galewitz, Deceased, Appellants; Hannah Galewitz et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $ 20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ.
### §§691 to 692. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted pursuant to section 5 of Pub. L. 104–130, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note below.

Section 691, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1021, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1200, provided line item veto authority.

Section 691a, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1022, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1201; amended Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10121(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 696, required special messages to Congress of cancellations made.

Section 691b, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1023, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1202, provided that cancellations were to be effective unless disapproved.

Section 691c, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1024, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1202; amended Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10121(b), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 696, related to deficit reduction.

Section 691d, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1025, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1203, related to expedited congressional consideration of disapproval bills.

Section 691e, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1026, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1207; amended Pub. L. 105–33, title X, §10122, Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 697, defined terms used in this subchapter.

Section 691f, Pub. L. 93–344, title X, §1027, as added Pub. L. 104–130, §2(a), Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1210, related to identification of limited tax benefits.

Section 692, Pub. L. 104–130, §3, Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1211, provided for judicial review.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Constitutionality

For information regarding the constitutionality of part C of title X of Pub. L. 93–344, as added by section 2(a) of Pub. L. 104–130, which was classified generally to this subchapter (sections 691 et seq. of this title), see the Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court on the Constitution Annotated website, constitution.congress.gov.

#### Effective and Termination Dates

Pub. L. 104–130, §5, Apr. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 1212, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter and provisions set out as a note under section 681 of this title and amending provisions set out as notes under section 621 of this title] and the amendments made by it shall take effect and apply to measures enacted on the earlier of—

"(1) the day after the enactment into law, pursuant to Article I, section 7, of the Constitution of the United States, of an Act entitled 'An Act to provide for a seven-year plan for deficit reduction and achieve a balanced Federal budget.'; or

"(2) January 1, 1997;

and shall have no force or effect on or after January 1, 2005."