alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.C.D. 00-31 AUG 1 6 2000

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION 

Heart of Georgia Railroad, Inc. (HOG)

This is a determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status

of the Heart of Georgia Railroad, Inc. (HOG) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et sea.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seq.) (RUIA).

In Finance Docket No. 33867, decided April 27, 2000, HOG filed a verified

notice of exemption to acquire and operate four contiguous sections of rail line

totaling 177.76 miles between Vidalia, Georgia, and Mahrt, Alabama, owned by

the State of Georgia and the Georgia Southwestern Railroad, Inc. (BA No.

5560). The decision noted that the transaction was expected to be

consummated shortly after April 26, 2000.

In'response to an inquiry from the Chief of the Board’s Audit and Compliance

Section, the Board received the following information from Brad Lefevers,

HOG’s President and CEO. HOG’s stock is owned by Brad Lefevers, Brett

Coleman and Tracy Coleman. HOG anticipated hiring 8 employees and

beginning operations on April 1, 2000. (In a telephone conversation on June 23,

2000 with a staff member from the Office ofthe General Counsel of the Board,

Mr. Lefevers indicated that HOG hired two employees on March 29, 2000 for 

start-up operations; three additional employees were hired in April and four

more employees were hired in May, 2000.) HOG is a short line railroad, and its

operations are described as delivering rail cars to and from its customers. HOG 

interchanges with the Norfolk Southern Railroad (BA No. 1525), CSXT (BA NO.

1524), the Georgia Central Railway (BA No. 5545) and the Georgia

Southwestern Railroad (BA No. 5560). Annual traffic is estimated at 6000 cars

of traffic from various shippers.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe RRA (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as is relevant here,

defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board under part A of subtitle IV of Title 49

[45 U.S.C. §231(a)(l)(i)].

Sections 1(a) and (b) of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain

substantially the same definition, as does section 3231 of the Railroad

Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

BA# 5575
If -2-

Heart of Georgia Railroad, Inc. (HOG)

The information provided indicates that HOG is subject to STB jurisdiction by

virtue ofits operation over the 177.76 miles of rail line between Vidalia,

Georgia, and Mahrt, Alabama. Because HOG falls within the definition of

employer under section l(a)(l)(i) of the RRA (45 U.S.C. § 23 l(a)(l)(i)) and the

corresponding provision of the RUIA, the Board finds that HOG became a rail

carrier employer effective March 29, 2000, the date on which it began start-up

operations. Cf Rev. Rul. 82-100, 1982-1 C.B. 155.

CherryfT. Thomas

*

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
#### § 10001.1 Purpose and scope.

The regulations in this part implement the provisions of the Privacy Act.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24567]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--3-A Sanitary Standards, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), 3-A Sanitary Standards, 
Inc. (``3-A SSI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: 3-A Sanitary 
Standards, Inc., McLean, VA. The nature and scope of 3-A SSI's 
standards development activities are: The development, maintenance and 
publishing of standards for the sanitary design, fabrication, 
installation and operation of equipment and machinery in the following 
areas: Vessels; fillers; valves and fittings; pumps and mixers; heat 
exchangers; conveyors and feeders; instruments; concentrating 
equipment; farm/raw milk; cheese and butter equipment; process and 
cleaning systems; plant support systems; materials and materials 
testing; and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.
    Additional information may be obtained from Timothy R. Rugh, CAE, 
Executive Director of 3-A Sanitary Standards, Inc., at (703) 790-0295.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24567 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Consolidated Service Stations, Inc., Respondent, v. Cities Service Oil Company, Appellant.

Plaintiff is entitled to recover rent from defendant, not because there is or will be created a landlord-tenant relationship between them, but because plaintiff is, as matter of law, the assignee of the landlord’s right to recover rent from defendant. *(United Merchants’ Realty & Improvement Co.*v. *Roth,*193 N. Y. 570.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 665.]
#### Champe S. Andrews v. New York Times Company.

Motion for leave to appeal denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Board Coverage Decision 

2002-46

Richmond Pacific Railroad Corp.

Name Change - Effective April 3, 2002 

Parr Terminal Railroad 

has changed its name to

Richmond Pacific Railroad Corp.

No Decision Published

BA# 4764
No. IV-09-005 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 March 17, 2009 

E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO DISCUSS 2008 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

FOR PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Tonopah, Ariz., on March 24, with 

representatives of Arizona Public Service Co., to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety 

performance during 2008 at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. The plant, operated by 

APS, is located 50 miles west of Phoenix. 

 The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m at the 

auditorium of the Tonopah Valley High School, 38201 W. Indian School Road, Tonopah. 

 In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer 

questions from the public on the safety performance of Palo Verde and the NRC’s role in ensuring 

safe plant operation. The status of a Confirmatory Action Letter that identified areas for 

improvement will also be discussed as well as the agency’s plans for oversight of Palo Verde during 

2009. 

 “We have seen notable improvements in the performance of Palo Verde during 2008,” NRC 

Region IV Administrator Elmo E. Collins said of the triple-reactor plant which has received 

additional NRC oversight since the fall of 2004. “The meeting will provide an opportunity for a 

discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance with the company and with local officials 

and residents who live near the plant.” 

 A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance of 

the plant during 2008 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. The letter states that 

Palo Verde met all NRC safety objectives. It is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/palo_2008q4.pdf. 

Current performance information for Palo Verde Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO1/palo1_chart.html. Current performance 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128 
information for Unit 2 is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO2/palo2_chart.html. Current performance 

information for Unit 3 is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO3/palo3_chart.html. 

 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### § 831.2202 Definitions.

In this subpart—

*Alternative form of annuity* means the benefit elected under § 831.2204.

*Current spouse annuity* has the same meaning as in § 831.603.

*Date of final adjudication* means the date 30 days after the date of the first regular monthly payment as defined in § 831.603.

*Former spouse annuity* has the same meaning as in § 831.603.

*Lump-sum credit* has the same meaning as in 5 U.S.C. 8331(8).

*Present value factor* has the same meaning in this subpart as defined in § 831.603.

*Time of retirement* has the same meaning as in § 831.603.

[51 FR 42989, Nov. 28, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 10136, Mar. 10, 1989; 82 FR 49280, Oct. 25, 2017]
December 11 , 2014



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE ESTATE OF BIL LIE LEE MARTIN, DECE ASED

NO. 14

- 13

- 00176

- CV

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on December 5, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.
We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the quarterly Report of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wais Asefi, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                            
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
    Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|By:    | /s/
    Wais Asefi          | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Wais
    Asefi              | 
|Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer | 
|Date:  | August
    14, 2018         | 



This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hechinger Liquidation Trust on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Conrad F. Hocking,
the Liquidation Trustee of the Liquidation Trust, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Liquidation Trust. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Conrad F. HockingConrad F. HockingLiquidation Trustee
================================================================================


EXHIIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  December 11, 2006                       /s/ Mark Hlady
                                             ----------------------
                                             Name: Mark Hlady
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  December 11, 2006                       /s/ Mark Hlady
                                             ----------------------
                                             Name: Mark Hlady
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer













--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2019192EN.01005201.xml

| 18.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/52

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 64/2019

of 29 March 2019

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1228]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 as regards the location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 amending Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 as regards the location of the seat of the European Medicines Agency (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 15zb (Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32018 R 1718: Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 November 2018 (OJ L 291, 16.11.2018, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2018/1718 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 March 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 291, 16.11.2018, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 841.802 Definitions.

As used in this subpart—

*Annuitant* means a person receiving or who is entitled and has made application to receive retirement or survivor benefits under subchapter II, IV, or V of chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code.

*Annuity* means the gross monthly annuity rate payable before any authorized deductions (such as those for health benefits and life insurance premiums).

*Qualifying court order* means a court order acceptable for processing as defined in § 838.103 of this chapter or a qualifying court order as defined in § 838.1003 of this chapter.

*Waiver* means an annuitant's written request to forfeit a specified amount of annuity as described in this subpart.

[52 FR 2058, Jan. 16, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 33598, July 29, 1992]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARJINDER SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-70612

Agency No. A089-697-548

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 6, 2014

San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Harjinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s

(IJ) denial of his applications for cancellation of removal, withholding of removal,

and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition and remand to the BIA. 

FILED

OCT 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Because the BIA’s analysis suggests that it conducted an independent review

of the record, we review the BIA’s decision. Ahmed v. Keisler, 504 F.3d 1183,

1190 (9th Cir. 2007). Despite the IJ’s adverse credibility finding, the BIA assumed

credibility for the purpose of its decision. We therefore assume that Singh’s

factual contentions are true. Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 657 (9th Cir. 2000).

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that Singh failed to

establish a nexus between his past mistreatment and his political opinion. Singh

testified that he was arrested, beaten, and threatened because he filed a complaint

against the police alleging that the police had a hand in his father’s death. During

his arrest, Singh was questioned about politics and ridiculed for his political

affiliation with the Shiromani Akali Dal party. Police officers threatened to kill

Singh if he did not retract his complaint. Singh’s testimony establishes a nexus

between his mistreatment and his real or imputed political opinion. See Grava v.

INS, 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000); Navas, 217 F.3d at 658–59.

Additionally, substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that

Singh failed to establish a nexus between his past mistreatment and a protected

social group. Singh testified that his father was an active member of the Shiromani

Akali Dal party and that the police wanted to stop his father’s activities. Singh was

arrested and questioned regarding his father’s whereabouts; Singh was threatened

2
and beaten during his arrest. Singh was only released when his father was arrested. 

Police continued to visit Singh’s home to threaten his father. This testimony

establishes a nexus between Singh’s mistreatment and a particular social group:

Singh’s family. See Jie Lin v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 1014, 1028–29 (9th Cir. 2004).

Therefore, we grant Singh’s petition for review and remand for the BIA to

consider issues other than nexus to an enumerated ground in the first instance. INS

v. Orlando Ventura, 537 U.S. 12 (2002).

Petition GRANTED and REMANDED. 

3
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Madera County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of resource advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the secure Rural Schools and 
Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Sierra 
National Forest's Resource Advisory Committee for Madera County will 
meet on Monday, November 15, 2004. The Madera Resource Advisory 
Committee will meet at the Spring Valley School, O'neals, CA 93644. The 
purpose of the meeting is: review FY 2004 RAC proposals.

DATES: The Madera Resource Advisory Committee meeting will be held 
Monday, November 15, 2004. The meeting will be held from 7 p.m. to 9 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Madera County RAC meeting will be held at the Spring 
Valley School, 46655 Road 200, North Fork, CA 93645.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Martin, U.S.D.A., Sierra National 
Forest, Bass Lake Ranger District, 57003 Road 225, North Fork, CA 93643 
(559) 877-2218 ext. 3100; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7511181407011c1b45403513065b1310115b0006"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff9b929e8d8b9691cfcabf998cd1999a9bd18a8c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
review of FY 2004 RAC proposals.

    Dated: November 4, 2004.
Curt E. Palmer,
Acting District Ranger, Bass Lake Ranger District.
[FR Doc. 04-25026 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2019173EN.01003501.xml

| 27.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/35

---

Information on the date of signature of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau

The Protocol (1) on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau was signed on 15 June 2019.

1

The Protocol applies provisionally from 15 June 2019, date of signature, in accordance with its Article 16.

---

(1)  See page 3 of this Official Journal.

1

---
### §154110. Service of process

The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1433.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154110 | 36:1045(b). | Sept. 10, 1962, Pub. L. 87–655, §5(b), 76 Stat. 531. |

Section

The words "at all times" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "to receive" are substituted for "authorized to accept", and the words "is notice to or service on" are substituted for "shall be deemed notice to or service upon", for consistency in the revised title.