Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices 67345 

future lease sales or discouraging 

exploration, development, or 

production under other leases or by 

interfering with potential future 

renewable energy activities). 

Thus, the issues related to DIP of 

pipeline valves and fittings and other 

pipeline-related infrastructure in 

deepwater are potentially complex, 

especially in light of the size and scope 

of some projects. Accordingly, BSEE 

invites the public to submit relevant 

information and comments on such 

issues in order to help BSEE establish a 

consistent and reasonable approach to 

consideration of requests to allow DIP of 

pipeline valves and fittings and other 

pipeline-related infrastructure in 

deepwater. 

II. Request for Information 

BSEE would appreciate your views, 

and any relevant technical information 

you can provide, on whether and under 

what circumstances it would be 

appropriate for BSEE to approve DIP of 

pipeline valves and fittings (pursuant to 

§ 250.1751(g)) and of other pipelinerelated infrastructure (pursuant to 

§ 250.142) in deepwater. Among other 

issues, BSEE would appreciate 

comments and information related to 

whether DIP of pipeline valves and 

fittings or other pipeline-related 

infrastructure in deepwater: (1) Could 

increase (or decrease) safety or 

environmental risks as compared to 

decommissioning by removal; or (2) 

could interfere with navigation, create 

an obstruction, or otherwise unduly 

interfere with present or future uses of 

the OCS. 

Please be as specific as possible in 

expressing your views and in the other 

information you provide. For example, 

please consider how your views or 

information could vary depending on 

specific circumstances, such as the 

water depth at which decommissioning 

takes place. Wherever possible, please 

provide relevant factual support for 

your views. 

Scott A. Angelle, 

Director, Bureau of Safety and Environmental 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2018–28304 Filed 12–27–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1139] 

Certain Electronic Nicotine Delivery 

Systems and Components Thereof; 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Correction of Notice. 

SUMMARY: Correction is made to notice 

83 FR 64156, which was published on 

December 13, 2018; the investigation 

number, ‘‘Investigation No. 337–TA– 

1139,’’ is erroneously missing from the 

title of the investigation. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 20, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–28176 Filed 12–27–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1081] 

Certain LED Devices, LED Power 

Supplies, and Components Thereof 

Notice of Request for Submissions on 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) has issued a recommended 

determination on remedy and bonding 

should a violation be found in the 

above-captioned investigation. The 

Commission is soliciting submissions 

on public interest issues raised by the 

recommended limited exclusion order 

against certain LED devices, LED power 

supplies, and components thereof, 

manufactured and imported by 

respondents Feit Electric Company, Inc. 

of Pico Rivera, California; Feit Electric 

Company, Inc. (China) of Xiamen, 

China; L G Sourcing, Inc. of North 

Wilkesboro, North Carolina; and Satco 

Products, Inc. of Brentwood, New York. 

This notice is soliciting comments from 

the public only. Parties are to file public 

interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR 

210.50(a)(4). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. The public version of the 

complaint can be accessed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides 

that if the Commission finds a violation 

it shall exclude the articles concerned 

from the United States: 

unless, after considering the effect of such 

exclusion upon the public health and 

welfare, competitive conditions in the United 

States economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the United 

States, and United States consumers, it finds 

that such articles should not be excluded 

from entry. 

19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). 

The Commission is interested in 

further development of the record on 

the public interest in these 

investigations. Accordingly, members of 

the public are invited to file 

submissions of no more than five (5) 

pages, inclusive of attachments, 

concerning the public interest in light of 

the administrative law judge’s 

recommended determination on remedy 

and bonding issued in this investigation 

on December 19, 2018. Comments 

should address whether issuance of the 

recommended limited exclusion order 

in this investigation would affect the 

public health and welfare in the United 

States, competitive conditions in the 

United States economy, the production 

of like or directly competitive articles in 

the United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the recommended 

limited exclusion order are used in the 

United States; 

(ii) Identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the recommended limited 

exclusion order; 

(iii) Identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
67346 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 248 / Friday, December 28, 2018 / Notices 

1All contract personnel will sign appropriate 

nondisclosure agreements. 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) Indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the recommended 

limited exclusion order within a 

commercially reasonable time; and 

(v) Explain how the recommended 

limited exclusion order would impact 

consumers in the United States. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business on 

January 16, 2019. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 

1081’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this Investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) By the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and in part 210 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

part 210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 20, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–28174 Filed 12–27–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1074] 

Certain Industrial Automation Systems 

and Components Thereof Including 

Control Systems, Controllers, 

Visualization Hardware, Motion and 

Motor Control Systems, Networking 

Equipment, Safety Devices, and Power 

Supplies; Commission Determination 

Not To Review a Final Initial 

Determination Finding a Section 337 

Violation by the Defaulted 

Respondents 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review a final initial determination 

(‘‘FID’’) of the presiding administrative 

law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding a section 337 

violation by the Defaulted Respondents. 

The Commission also requests written 

submissions, under the schedule set 

forth below, on remedy, the public 

interest, and bonding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non–confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at https://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on October 16, 2017, based on a 

complaint filed by Complainant 

Rockwell Automation, Inc. of 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin. See 82 FR 

48113–15 (Oct. 16, 2017). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 based on the 

infringement of certain registered 

trademarks and copyrights and on 

unfair methods of competition and 

unfair acts in the importation or sale of 

certain industrial automation systems 

and components thereof including 

control systems, controllers, 

visualization hardware, motion and 

motor control systems, networking 

equipment, safety devices, and power 

supplies, the threat or effect of which is 

to destroy or substantially injure an 

industry in the United States. See id. 

The Notice of Investigation identifies 

the following respondents: Can Electric 

Limited of Guangzhou, China (‘‘Can 

Electric’’); Capnil (HK) Company 

Limited of Hong Kong (‘‘Capnil’’); 

Fractioni (Hongkong) Ltd. of Shanghai, 

China (‘‘Fractioni’’); Fujian Dahong 

Trade Co. of Fujian, China (‘‘Dahong’’); 

GreySolution Limited d/b/a Fibica of 

Hong Kong (‘‘GreySolution’’); Huang 

Wei Feng d/b/a A–O–M Industry of 

Shenzhen, China (‘‘Huang’’); KBS 

Electronics Suzhou Co, Ltd. of 

Shanghai, China (‘‘KBS’’); PLC–VIP 

Shop d/b/a VIP Tech Limited of Hong 

Kong (‘‘PLC–VIP’’); Radwell 

International, Inc. d/b/a PLC Center of 

Willingboro, New Jersey (‘‘Radwell’’); 

Shanghai EuoSource Electronic Co., Ltd 

of Shanghai, China (‘‘EuoSource’’); 

ShenZhen T-Tide Trading Co., Ltd. of 

Shenzhen, China (‘‘T-Tide’’); SoBuy 

Commercial (HK) Co. Limited of Hong 

Kong (‘‘SoBuy’’); Suzhou Yi Micro 

Optical Co., Ltd., d/b/a Suzhou Yiwei 

Guangxue Youxiangongsi, d/b/a Easy 

Microoptics Co. LTD. of Jiangsu, China 

(‘‘Suzhou’’); Wenzhou Sparker Group 

Co. Ltd., d/b/a Sparker Instruments of 

Wenzhou, China (‘‘Sparker’’); and 

Yaspro Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

of Shanghai, China (‘‘Yaspro’’). See id. 

In addition, the Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is also a party in this 

investigation. See id. 

Nine respondents were found in 

default, namely, Fractioni, 

GreySolution, KBS, EuoSource, T-Tide, 

SoBuy, Suzhou, Yaspro and Can Electric 

(collectively, ‘‘the Defaulted 

Respondents’’). See Order No. 17 (Feb. 

1, 2018), unreviewed, Comm’n Notice 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1