alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §20988. Jessica Lunsford Address Verification Grant Program

#### (a) Establishment

There is established the Jessica Lunsford Address Verification Grant Program (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Program").

#### (b) Grants authorized

Under the Program, the Attorney General is authorized to award grants to State,1 local governments, and Indian tribal governments to assist in carrying out programs requiring an appropriate official to verify, at appropriate intervals, the residence of all or some registered sex offenders.

#### (c) Application

#### (1) In general

Each State or local government seeking a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require.

#### (2) Contents

Each application submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall—

(A) describe the activities for which assistance under this section is sought; and

(B) provide such additional assurances as the Attorney General determines to be essential to ensure compliance with the requirements of this section.

#### (d) Innovation

In making grants under this section, the Attorney General shall ensure that different approaches to address verification are funded to allow an assessment of effectiveness.

#### (e) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 2009 such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

#### (2) Report

Not later than April 1, 2009, the Attorney General shall report to Congress—

(A) assessing the effectiveness and value of this section;

(B) comparing the cost effectiveness of address verification to reduce sex offenses compared to other alternatives; and

(C) making recommendations for continuing funding and the appropriate levels for such funding.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title VI, §631, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 641.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16988 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 So in original. Probably should be "States,".
<PAGE> 1



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Claudia L. Acord, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.

                                          /s/ CLAUDIA L. ACORD
                                          ------------------------
                                          Claudia L. Acord
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          November 10, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. and
will be retained by Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 of 1

EPA’s Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act TAS Provision

– Meeting with the

Legal Net wo rk of the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS)

Thursday, June 4, 2015

1 :00

– 2 : 0 0 p.m. EDT Meeting Summary

EPA Moderator: Avi Garb ow, EPA General Counsel

EPA Presenter: Tod Siegal , EPA Office of General Counsel Participants: Representatives of o ver 3 0 states

The topic of the potential reinterpretation of the tribal authority provision of the Clean Water Act was one of several on the agenda. Two documents that were provided to invitees in advance of the meeting are available in the docket for thi s rulemaking:

 Clean Water Act Tribal Provision: Overview

, p repared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water and Office of General Counsel

, May 2015.

 Clean Water Act Tribal Provision: Discussion Paper

, p repared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water and Office of General Counsel

, May

2015.

Tod Siegal provided a brief overview of the potential action

.

Participants raised n o questions or issues

.
§ 575.310 Service agreement requirements. ( a ) Before paying a retention incentive, an agency must require an employee, including each employee covered by a group retention incentive authorization and any employee who may receive a higher retention incentive as a result of an approved waiver of the maximum limit on the amount of a retention incentive under § 575.309(e), to sign a written service agreement to complete a specified period of employment with the agency (or successor agency in the event of a transfer of function). An authorized agency official must determine the length of a service period. A written service agreement is not required under the condition described in paragraph (f) of this section.
( b ) The service agreement must include the commencement and termination dates of the required service period. The service period must begin on the first day of a pay period and end on the last day of a pay period.
( c ) The service agreement must specify the retention incentive percentage rate established under § 575.309(a); whether the incentive will be paid in installments or in a lump-sum payment upon completion of the service period provided in the service agreement; whether any installment payments will be paid at less than the full retention incentive percentage rate established under § 575.309(a), with the accrued but unpaid incentive payment being paid in a lump sum upon completion of the full service period required by the service agreement under § 575.309(c)(2); and the timing of incentive payments.
( d ) The service agreement must include the conditions under which the agency must terminate the service agreement before the employee completes the agreed-upon service period (*i.e.*, if an employee is demoted or separated for cause, receives a rating of record of less than “Fully Successful” or equivalent, or otherwise fails to fulfill the terms of the service agreement) under § 575.311. The service agreement must specify the effect of a termination, including the conditions under which the agency will pay an additional retention incentive payment for partially completed service under § 575.311(e) and (f).
( e ) The service agreement may include any other terms or conditions that, if violated, will result in a termination of the service agreement under § 575.311(b). For example, the service agreement may specify the employee's work schedule, type of position, and the duties he or she is expected to perform. In addition, the service agreement may address the extent to which periods of time on detail, in a nonpay status, or in paid leave status are creditable towards the completion of the service period.
( f ) A written service agreement is not required if the agency— ( 1 ) Pays the retention incentive in biweekly installments; and
( 2 ) Sets each biweekly installment payment at the full retention incentive percentage rate established for the employee under § 575.309(a).
[70 FR 25747, May 13, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 74996, Dec. 19, 2005]
§ 550.705 Criteria for meeting the requirement for 12 months of continuous employment. ( a ) The requirement for 12 months of continuous employment is met if, on the date of separation, an employee has held one or more civilian Federal positions over a period of 12 months without a single break in service of more than 3 calendar days. The positions held must have been under: ( 1 ) One or more qualifying appointments;
( 2 ) One or more nonqualifying temporary appointments that precede the current qualifying appointment; or
( 3 ) An appointment to a position in a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard that precedes the current qualifying appointment in the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard, respectively.
( b ) When a break in service that is covered by severance pay interrupts otherwise continuous Federal employment, the entire period is considered continuous service.
( c ) The period during which an employee receives continuation of pay or compensation for an injury on the job under chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, is considered continuous Federal service.
[55 FR 6593, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 12405, Apr. 10, 1992]
### §21301. Organization

American Historical Association (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a body corporate and politic in the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1294.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21301 | 36:20 (1st sentence words before "for the promotion"). | Jan. 4, 1889, ch. 20, (1st sentence words before "for the promotion"), 25 Stat. 640. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words.
### §108. Constitution Week

The President is requested to issue each year a proclamation—

(1) designating September 17 through September 23 as Constitution Week; and

(2) inviting the people of the United States to observe Constitution Week, in schools, churches, and other suitable places, with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1256.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 108 | 36:159. | Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 875, 70 Stat. 932. |

Section
§ 838.621 Prorata share. ( a ) *Pro rata share* means one-half of the fraction whose numerator is the number of months of Federal civilian and military service that the employee performed during the marriage and whose denominator is the total number of months of Federal civilian and military service performed by the employee through the day before the effective date of phased retirement or separation for retirement, as applicable to the annuity calculation. In the computation of the division of phased retirement annuity and a composite retirement annuity, a pro rata share will be computed through the day before the effective date of an employee's phased retirement for the computation of the division of a phased retirement annuity and then recomputed for division of the composite retirement annuity under §§ 831.1742 and 848.502.
( b ) A court order that awards a former spouse a prorata share of an employee annuity or a refund of employee contributions by using the term “prorata share” and identifying the date when the marriage began satisfies the requirements of §§ 838.305 and 838.504 and awards the former spouse a prorata share as defined in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) A court order that awards a portion of an employee annuity as of a specified date before the employee's phased retirement or retirement awards the former spouse a pro rata share as defined in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) A court order that awards a portion of the “value” of an annuity as of a specific date before retirement, without specifying what “value” is, awards the former spouse a prorata share as defined in paragraph (a) of this section.
[57 FR 33574, July 29, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 46627, Aug. 8, 2014]
§ 841.202 Applications required. ( a ) No benefit is payable under FERS, until after the claimant has applied for the benefit in the form prescribed by OPM.
( b ) An employee, Member, or survivor may exercise any option or make any election authorized by FERS only in the form prescribed by OPM.
#### Mary J. Lane, Respondent, v. New York Post-Graduate Medical School and Hospital, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 871.]
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
|   | 2. | The information contained in the annual              report              fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition              and              results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| OnScreen                Technologies, Inc.                            |                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                                                  |                          |
| By:                __/s/_______________________                       | March                30, 2007 |
| Russell                L. Wall                                        |                               |
| Chief                Executive Officer / Director                     |                          |
|                                                                  |                          |
| By:                __/s/_______________________                       | March                30, 2007 |
| Mark                R. Chandler                                       |                               |
| Chief                Financial Officer / Principal Accounting Officer |                          |
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              November 14, 2008
            
            /s/ *B.J.
              Sparks*B.J.
                Sparks
              Chief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


Exhibit
        32.2
 Page
        1 of
        1 Page
#### § 734.504 Contributions to political action committees through voluntary payroll allotments prohibited.

An employee described in § 734.502(a) may not financially contribute to a political action committee through a voluntary allotment made under § 550.311(b) of this title.

[61 FR 35102, July 5, 1996]
Exhibit 31.2

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Norman S. Johnson, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas Corporation.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: October 18, 2006

 

/s/ Norman S. Johnson                                    

Norman S. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

D/JLM/912642.1
U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Research
  Search ESRL:  
Calendar | People | Publications
Skip navigation
-  About    - Organization 
  - What We     Do 
  - About the     Director 
  - Staff Listing 
  - Contacts 
  - Planning 
-  Research    - Systems     Development 
  - Observing     Systems 
  - Modeling     and Data Assimiliation 
  - High     Performance Computing 
  - Real-Time Verification System 
-  Outreach    - Visitor     Services 
  - Education 
  - Maps &     Lodging 
  - Science on a Sphere® 
  - NOAA's     Virtual World 
  - Outreach     Calendar 
-  Media Center    - Headlines 
  - Awards 
  - Outreach     Calendar 
  - Conference     Rooms 
  - GSD and Archived     FSL Publications 
-  Weather    - Current     Conditions 
  - Observations 
  - Forecasts     & Analyses 
  - Daily     Weather Briefing 
-  Data    - On-Line     Databases 
  - Real-Time     Data 
  - Retrospective 
  - MADIS 
  - Software 
-  ESRL Home    - Visit the ESRL Homepage 
- What's New   
- GSD's   Role in Wildfire Planning Workshop 
- ESRL   Researchers Demo at National Association of Broadcasters Conference 
- ESRL's   SOS Featured at COP15 
- ESRL   Technology at Emergency Managers Conference 
- Contact us 
- GSD   Branches     - Assimilation &     Modeling 
  - Information Systems 
  - Aviation 
  - Technology Outreach 
  - Forecast Applications 
  - Information & Tech     Services 
- Intranet 
- Search GSD 
- ESRL Divisions    - Global Monitoring (GMD) 
  - Physical Sciences (PSD) 
  - Chemical Sciences (CSD) 
  - Global Systems (GSD) 
Archived FSL Forum IssuesDecember               2003February               2003June               2002December               2000Feburary               2000February               1999March               1998November               1997June               1997December               1996
GSD online publications are in the public domain and free                     of charge. Publications are available for downloading in PDF                     and HTML. For a hard copy of any publication, to change                     subscription status, or if you have questions or comments                     regarding any GSD publications, contact the editor:

Annie Reiser NOAA/ESRL/Global Systems                       Division, R/GSD David Skaggs Research Center 325                       Broadway Boulder, Colorado 80305-3328                       Phone: 303-497-6634 Fax:                       303-497-3329 Email: Ann.M.Reiser@noaa.gov
U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEarth System Research Laboratory | Global Systems Divisionhttp://esrl.noaa.gov/gsd/publications/forum.htmlPrivacy Policy | Accessibility | DisclaimerContact the Webmasterwebmaster.gsd@noaa.gov
Schedule to Form of Change in Control Agreement



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 Schedule to Form of Change in Control Agreement between 
 Ryerson Tull, Inc. and the following parties: 
  
 James M. Delaney 
 Stephen E. Makarewicz
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Sabrenda T. Littles v. Riverwalk Council of Co-Owners, Inc. and JDH 

Association Management Co.

Appellate case number: 01-16-00790-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-38134

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: October 22, 2018

Party filing motion: Appellant/Cross-Appellee

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny appellant/cross-appellee’s motion for en 

banc reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Terry Jennings________

Acting for the Court the En Banc Court*

Date: ___November 20, 2018__

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, Lloyd, and Caughey.