alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §140511. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be distributed as provided by the board of directors, but in compliance with the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1384.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140511 | 36:835. | Aug. 26, 1958, Pub. L. 85–761, §15, 72 Stat. 859. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The words "outstanding" and "all Federal and State laws applicable thereto" are omitted as unnecessary.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1556-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio (FEMA-1556-DR), dated September 19, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 2, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 19, 2004: 

Vinton County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance.) 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary,  Emergency Preparedness and Response,  Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-25039 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### Elizabeth R. Fondiller, Respondent, v. Richard Fondiller et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [179 Misc. 1086.]
#### Robert Lee SPARKMAN *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 04-268

158 S.W.3d 123

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered April 8, 2004

*Jeff Kearney,*for appellant.

No response.

*689Per Curiam.

Appellant, Robert Lee Sparkman, by and through his attorney, Jeff Kearney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. The record reflects that appellant was convicted of rape and sentenced to eighteen years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. The judgment and commitment order was filed on August 6, 2003. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on September 2, 2003.

On November 25, 2003, the trial court entered an order extending the time to file the record on appeal until March 6, 2004. Because March 6, 2004, fell on a Saturday, the time for filing the record was extended to Monday, March 8, 2004. Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 9. A partial record was tendered with this court’s clerk on March 8, 2004, contemporaneous with the filing of the motion for rule on clerk. Because the partial record was timely filed, we will not consider the motion for rule on clerk. *Franklin v. State,*318 Ark. 687, 886 S.W.2d 633 (1994). However, in his motion, appellant prays that this court authorize the lodging of the appeal herein on the basis of the partial record, and that the court issue a writ of certiorari, granting the court reporter thirty days within which to complete the record on appeal.

We authorize the lodging of the partial record in this case and issue a writ of certiorari directing Sharon L. Fields, Official Court Reporter for the Circuit Court, Division II, Nineteenth District West, to complete and file the transcript in this matter within thirty days of the date of this order.
### §150707. Exclusive right to name, seals, emblems, and badges

The corporation has the exclusive right to use the name "National Conference on Citizenship" and seals, emblems, and badges the corporation adopts.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1393.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150707 | 36:446. | Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 427, §16, 67 Stat. 565. |

Section

The word "sole" is omitted as unnecessary and for consistency in the revised title.
### §150513. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be divided equally among the State and territorial societies in the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1391.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150513 | 36:417. | Apr. 3, 1952, ch. 131, §17, 66 Stat. 41. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
25, 2009





/s/
      B.J. SparksB.J.
      SparksChief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Slip-Op 05-58

United States Court of International Trade

NORSK HYDRO CANADA INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant,

 and

U.S. MAGNESIUM, LLC,

 Defendant-Intervenor. 

 

Before: Pogue, Judge

Court No. 03-00828

ORDER

On October 24, 2004, this Court denied Defendant’s motion to

dismiss Plaintiff’s action. Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United

States, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (2004). In that opinion, the Court

held that it had subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. The

Court further held that “[the Department of] Commerce has the

authority under [19 U.S.C.] § 1671(a) to ensure that the amount of

the countervailing duty imposed is equal to the amount of the net

countervailable subsidy.” Norsk Hydro, 350 F. Supp. 2d at 1186.

Moreover, 19 U.S. C. §1675a(a)(1)(A) requires that, in an

administrative review, the Department of Commerce is to “review and

determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy.” 

Following the Court’s opinion, Plaintiff filed a Motion for

Judgment on the Agency Record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2.

Plaintiff’s motion, and the responses thereto, are now before the

Court. However, neither the motion nor the responses thereto have

raised any new legal claims other than those resolved by the

Court’s prior opinion. 

The Department of Commerce, in the proceedings below,

determined that it could not offset future duties by the amount

Plaintiff overpaid in the past. Therefore, Commerce did not make

an evidentiary finding regarding the merits of Plaintiff’s case to

“determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy.”

Consequently, this Court has no evidence on the record to review.
Ct. No. 03-00828 Page 2

Accordingly, the Court having resolved the meaning of the relevant

statutory provisions in Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States,

350 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (2004), it is hereby

ORDERED that the Department of Commerce’s final results in the

administrative review of Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from

Canada, 68 Fed. Reg. 53962(Dep’t Commerce Sept. 15, 2003) (final

results of countervailing duty administrative review)are remanded

to the Department of Commerce; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon remand, and consistent with

this Court’s opinion and order, the Department of Commerce shall

“review and determine the amount of any net countervailable

subsidy,” and specifically shall “ensure that the amount of the

countervailing duty imposed is equal to the amount of the net

countervailable subsidy;” 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Department of Commerce shall

determine the amount of any duty remaining to be assessed; 

The Department of Commerce shall have until June 17, 2005 to

submit its remand determination. The parties shall have until July

1, 2005 to submit comments on the remand determination. Rebuttal

comments shall be submitted by July 15, 2005.

 /s/ 

 Donald C. Pogue, Judge

Dated: May 17, 2005

New York, New York
Section 1350 Certification

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2
                                                                   ------------

      In connection with the quarterly report of Pioneer Financial Services,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

      Date: February 13, 2004


                               By:  /s/ Randall J. Opliger
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Randall J. Opliger
                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### Louis Appelbaum, Appellant, v. Frieda Appelbaum, Respondent.

Order modified on the facts by reducing from $500 to $250 the amount awarded to defendant for counsel fee and disbursements on the appeal from the order granting defendant temporary alimony and counsel fee. As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### §151904. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—(1) The board of directors is the governing body of the corporation. Between meetings of the members of the corporation, the board is responsible for the general policies and program of the corporation and for the control of all funds of the corporation.

(2) The number of directors, their manner of selection (including the filling of vacancies), and their term of office are as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation. However—

(A) the corporation shall have at least 15 but not more than 25 directors; and

(B) at least four of the directors shall be members of the medical profession.

(b) Officers.—(1) The officers of the corporation are a chairman of the board of directors, a president, one or more vice presidents as provided in the constitution and bylaws, a secretary, a treasurer, and one or more assistant secretaries and assistant treasurers as provided in the constitution and bylaws.

(2) The manner of election, term of office, and duties of the officers are as provided in the constitution and bylaws.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1408.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151904(a) | 36:607. | Aug. 28, 1954, ch. 1036, §§7, 8, 68 Stat. 893. |
| 151904(b) | 36:608. | |

Section

In subsection (a), the text of 36:607(a) is omitted as obsolete. In paragraph (1), the words "control of all funds of the corporation" are substituted for "control of all contributed funds as may be raised by the corporation" to eliminate unnecessary words.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Diagnostic Corporation of America
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, SAM WINER, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Sam Winer                           
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
|                        |  | Officer, Secretary and Chairman of      
|                        |  | the Board of Directors
Kodiak Energy, Inc.
 
 EXHIIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the amended annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-KA
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
March 27, 2009
 
 /s/   William S.
Tighe
 William
S. Tighe
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
No: II-08-016 April 1, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2007 PERFORMANCE OF 

HATCH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Wednesday, 

April 9, with representatives of Southern Nuclear Operating Company to discuss the agency’s 

assessment of safety performance during 2007 at the Hatch Nuclear Power Plant. The plant, 

operated by Southern Nuclear, is in south Georgia 11 miles north of the town of Baxley. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. in the 

Appling County Commissioners Meeting Room, 69 Tippins Street in Baxley. 

After the formal presentation, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the 

public on the safety performance of Hatch, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant 

operation. 

“The NRC continually inspects and reviews the performance of Hatch and all commercial 

nuclear plants, issuing inspection reports throughout the year and an overall assessment at year’s 

end,” NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree said. “This meeting is an opportunity to 

discuss that annual assessment with the company, local officials and people near the plant, and to 

answer any questions they may have.” 

The NRC said the Hatch plant operated safely during the 2007 assessment period, from 

Jan. 1 through Dec. 31, with Unit 1 having all inspection findings of very low safety significance 

and all performance indicators indicating performance at levels requiring no additional NRC 

oversight. As a result, the NRC plans to conduct routine baseline inspections on Unit 1 during 

2008. 

Plant performance for Hatch Unit 2 was in the Regulatory Response column of the 

NRC’s Action Matrix for the final three quarters of 2007 due to a high pressure injection system 

performance indicator crossing the threshold from “green” to “white” in the second quarter of 

2007. When assessing nuclear plant performance, the NRC uses color-coded performance 

indicators and inspection findings. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” 

“yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. A 

supplemental NRC inspection was conducted in early March to review the actions taken by the 

plant to address the “white” performance indicator. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2007 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/hat_2007q4.pdf . 

Current performance information for the two units at the Hatch plant is available on the 

NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT1/hat1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAT2/hat2_chart.html . 

###
### §10387. Access to documents

#### (a) By Attorney General

The Attorney General shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any pertinent books, documents, papers, or records of a grant recipient under this subchapter and to the pertinent books, documents, papers, or records of State and local governments, persons, businesses, and other entities that are involved in programs, projects, or activities for which assistance is provided under this subchapter.

#### (b) By Comptroller General

Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to audits and examinations conducted by the Comptroller General of the United States or by an authorized representative of the Comptroller General.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1707, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title I, §10003(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1813.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796dd–6 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §41302. Acquisition of statistical data on child abuse

#### (a) Data acquisition for 1987 and 1988

The Attorney General shall acquire from criminal justice agencies statistical data, for the calendar years 1987 and 1988, about the incidence of child abuse, including child sexual abuse, and shall publish annually a summary of such data.

#### (b) Modification of uniform crime reporting program

(1) As soon as practicable, but in no case later than January 1, 1989, the Attorney General shall modify the uniform crime reporting program in the Federal Bureau of Investigation to include data on the age of the victim of the offense and the relationship, if any, of the victim to the offender, for types of offenses that may involve child abuse, including child sexual abuse.

(2) The modification, once made, shall remain in effect until the later of—

(A) 10 years after the date it is made; or

(B) such ending date as may be set by the Attorney General.

(Pub. L. 99–401, title I, §105, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 906.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 5101 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.