alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017085EN.01002801.xml

| 30.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 211/2015

of 25 September 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/518]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/446 of 17 March 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘barium selenate’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/446 of 17 March 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance ‘barium selenate’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 0446: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/446 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 0446: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/446 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 18).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/446 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Ingrid SCHULERUD

---

(1)  
  OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 18.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2012

To require the Secretary of Defense to implement fully by September 30, 

2004, requirements for additional Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil 

Support Teams. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2003

Mr. GIBBONS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Defense to implement fully by 

September 30, 2004, requirements for additional Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Weapons of Mass De5 struction Civil Support Team Implementation Act of 

6 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2012 IH 

1 SEC. 2. FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF REQUIREMENTS FOR 

2 ADDITIONAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUC3 TION CIVIL SUPPORT TEAMS. 

4 (a) DEADLINE FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION.—The 

5 Secretary of Defense shall fully implement the require6 ments regarding the establishment and number of Weap7 ons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams under sec8 tion 1403(a) of the Bob Stump National Defense Author9 ization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107–314; 

10 116 Stat. 2676; 10 U.S.C. 12310 note) not later than 

11 September 30, 2004. 

12 (b) PERSONNEL.—In order to meet the requirement 

13 in subsection (a), the authorized end strengths for mem14 bers of the National Guard serving on full-time National 

15 Guard duty as of September 30, 2004, shall be increased 

16 over the number of such members otherwise authorized 

17 by law by the number of such members as follows: 

18 (1) For the Army National Guard of the United 

19 States, 414 members of the National Guard. 

20 (2) For the Air National Guard of the United 

21 States, 92 members of the National Guard. 

22 (c) FUNDING.—(1) From the aggregate amount au23 thorized to be appropriated for procurement for the Armed 

24 Forces by title I of the National Defense Authorization 

25 Act for Fiscal Year 2004, there shall be available (and 

26 may be transferred to other authorizations of appropria-
3

•HR 2012 IH 

1 tions, as appropriate) such sums as the Secretary con2 siders appropriate to meet the requirement in subsection 

3 (a) in accordance with this section. 

4 (2) The Secretary shall allocate among the accounts 

5 for procurement for the Armed Forces for fiscal year 2004 

6 the reduction in amounts available for such procurement 

7 under title I of that Act by reason of the availability of 

8 funds under paragraph (1) to meet the requirement in 

9 subsection (a).

Æ
CERTIFICATION

Exhibit 31.2

I, Randall J. Opliger, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.;

2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over ‘financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

----
# L_2016129EN.01004801.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/48

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 64/2015

of 20 March 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2016/747]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 3870 of 17 June 2014 amending Commission Decision C(2010) 774 as regards clarification, harmonisation and simplification of the use of explosive trace detection is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 3870 of 17 June 2014 amending Commission Decision C(2010) 774 as regards clarification, harmonisation and simplification of the use of explosive trace detection is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66hf (Commission Decision C(2010) 774 final) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 D 3870: Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 3870 of 17 June 2014 amending Commission Decision C(2010) 774 as regards clarification, harmonisation and simplification of the use of explosive trace detection.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 D 3870: Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 3870 of 17 June 2014 amending Commission Decision C(2010) 774 as regards clarification, harmonisation and simplification of the use of explosive trace detection.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### **CHAPTER 213—AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION**

Sec.
21301.
Organization.
21302.
Purposes.
21303.
Powers.
21304.
Annual meeting.
21305.
Principal office.
21306.
Historical collections.
21307.
Annual report.
# L_2016129EN.01005101.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/51

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 67/2015

of 20 March 2015

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2016/750]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2014/80/EU of 20 June 2014 amending Annex II to Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2014/80/EU of 20 June 2014 amending Annex II to Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 13caa (Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 L 0080: Commission Directive 2014/80/EU of 20 June 2014 (OJ L 182, 21.6.2014, p. 52).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 L 0080: Commission Directive 2014/80/EU of 20 June 2014 (OJ L 182, 21.6.2014, p. 52).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/80/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 182, 21.6.2014, p. 52.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §20206. Powers

The corporation has only the powers provided in its bylaws and articles of incorporation filed in each State in which it is incorporated.

(Added Pub. L. 105–354, §1(4)(A), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3240.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20206 | 36 App.:5802. | Nov. 18, 1997, Pub. L. 105–85, title XV, §1502, 111 Stat. 1963. |

Section

The words "each State in which it is incorporated" are substituted for "the District of Columbia" for consistency in the revised title. The words "and subject to the laws of the District of Columbia" are omitted as unnecessary.
§ 334.106 Requirement for written agreement. ( a ) Before the assignment begins, the assigned employee and the Federal agency, the State, local, Indian tribal government, institution of higher education, or other eligible organization must enter into a written agreement recording the obligations and responsibilities of the parties, as specified in 5 U.S.C. 3373-3375.
( b ) Federal agencies must maintain a copy of each assignment agreement form established under this part, including any modification to the agreement. The agency may determine the appropriate time period for retaining copies of its written agreements.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         I, Jerome Natoli, Chief Financial Officer of NexPrise, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

                  (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which
         this certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

                  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Registrant.


Date:  March 17, 2003                                    /s/  Jerome Natoli
                                                         Jerome Natoli
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO                                                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of Security
With Advanced Technology, Inc., (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30,
2007, each of the undersigned Scott Sutton, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Jeffrey G. McGonegal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigneds knowledge
and belief:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                                     |                                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 20, 2007 
                   
                   
Date: August 20, 2007 | By: /s/ Scott Sutton
Scott Sutton
Chief Executive Officer
 By: /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
      Chief Financial Officer

*   *   *   *   *

A signed original of the written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Order entered April 24, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01201
- CR
GERRICK ANTHONY HAWT HORNE, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19
- 52867
- Y

O RDER Before the Court is appella n t ’ s April 23, 2020 motion to supplement the
record . We GRANT the motion. We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia
Pitre to file a supplemental clerk ’ s record containing the signed jury charge on guilt/inn ocen ce and the signed jury charge on pu nishment W ITHIN TEN DAYS
of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
#### § 841.702 Definitions.

In this subpart—

*Annuity supplement* means the benefit under subpart E of part 842 of this chapter. An *annuity supplement* is only payable to retirees.

*Basic annuity* means the benefits computed under subpart D of part 842 of this chapter and payable to retirees.

*Basic employee death benefit* means the basic employee death benefit as defined in § 843.102 of this chapter.

*Beneficiary of insurable interest annuity* means a person receiving a recurring benefit under FERS that is payable (after the employee's, Members, or retiree's death) to a person designated to receive such an annuity under § 842.605 of this chapter.

*COLA* means a cost-of-living adjustment.

*Combined CSRS/FERS annuity* means the recurring benefit with a CSRS component and a FERS component. A “combined CSRS/FERS annuity” is only payable to a retiree who as an employee elected to transfer to FERS under part 846 of this chapter, who at the time of transfer had at least 5 years of service creditable under CSRS (excluding service that was subject to both social security and partial CSRS deductions), and who was covered by FERS for at least 1 month.

*CSRS* means the Civil Service Retirement System as described in subchapter III of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code.

*CSRS component* means the portion of a combined CSRS/FERS annuity that is computed under CSRS rules.

*Current spouse annuity* means a current spouse annuity as defined in § 842.602 of this chapter.

*Disability retiree* means a retiree who retired under part 844 of this chapter.

*Effective date* means the date annuities increased by a COLA begin to accrue at the higher rate.

*FERS* means the Federal Employees Retirement System as defined in chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code.

*FERS component* means the portion of a combined CSRS/FERS annuity computed under FERS rules.

*Former spouse annuity* means a former spouse annuity as defined in § 842.602 of this chapter.

*Initial monthly rate* means the monthly annuity rate that a retiree (other than a disability retiree) is entitled to receive at the time of retirement (as defined in § 842.602 of this chapter).

*Percentage change* means the percent change in the price index as defined in section 8462(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code.

*Retiree* means a retiree as defined in § 842.602 of this chapter.

*Survivor* means a person receiving a current spouse annuity or a former spouse annuity, or the beneficiary of an insurable interest annuity. As used in this subpart, “survivor” does not include a child annuitant.

*Survivor supplement* means the recurring benefit payable to a survivor under § 843.308 of this chapter.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201500413

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### WILLIAM G. MAC Operations Specialist Third Class (E

- 4 ), U.S. Navy Appellant

___________________

______ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Paul C. LeBlanc , JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Command ing Officer , USS PINCKNEY (DDG 91)

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander

C hristo pher P. Toscano, JAGC, USN

. For Appellant: Capt ain Daniel R. Douglas , USMC. For Appellee: Lieutenant Commander Catheryne E. Pully, JAGC,

USN; Lieutenant Jetti L. Gibson , JAGC, USN.

_________________________ Decided 16 February 2017

______________________ ___ Before M ARKS , G LASER

- A LLEN , and J ONES , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but may be cited as persuasive authority under NMCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.2.

_____________________ ____ PER CURIAM : A military judge sitting as a special court

- martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification of wrongful use of marijuana and one specification of assault consummated by a battery in violation of Articles 112a a nd 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 928.United States v. Mac , No. 201 500413

2 The military judge sentenced the appellant to eight months’ confinement, forfeiture of $1,144.00 pay per month for eight months, reduction to pay grade E

- 1, and a bad

- conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence. The appellant avers , and the government concedes , that the adjudged and approved forfeiture s of pay exceed the maximum allowed by law at this special court

- martial. The military judge calculated the a djudged forfeiture amount by mistakenly including the $100 sea pay the appellant receiv ed at the time of trial. “ T he maximum authorized amount of a partial forfeiture shall be determined by using the basic pay

. . . and, if no confinement is adjudged , any sea or hardship duty pay.” R ULE FOR C OURTS

- M ARTIAL 1003(b)(2), M ANUAL FOR C OURTS

- M ARTIAL , U NITED S TATES (2012 ed.) (emphasis added). As the adjudged sentence here included confinement, t he military judge should not have included sea pay when calculat i ng ma ximum forfeitures

— two

- thirds of basic pay , in whole dollars, at the appellant’s reduced rank, or $1,031.00 pay per month

. After taking corrective action, we conclude that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and that no error materially p rejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant remains. Arts. 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ. The findings and only so much of the sentence as provides for confinement for eight months, reduction to pay grade E

- 1, forfeiture of $1 , 031.00 pay per month for e ight months, and a bad

- conduct discharge are affirmed.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL
Clerk of Court