alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §935. Substitution of carrier for employer

In any case where the employer is not a self-insurer, in order that the liability for compensation imposed by this chapter may be most effectively discharged by the employer, and in order that the administration of this chapter in respect of such liability may be facilitated, the Secretary shall by regulation provide for the discharge, by the carrier for such employer, of such obligations and duties of the employer in respect to such liability, imposed by this chapter upon the employer, as it considers proper in order to effectuate the provisions of this chapter. For such purposes (1) notice to or knowledge of an employer of the occurrence of the injury shall be notice to or knowledge of the carrier, (2) jurisdiction of the employer by a deputy commissioner, the Board, or the Secretary, or any court under this chapter shall be jurisdiction of the carrier, and (3) any requirement by a deputy commissioner, the Board, or the Secretary, or any court under any compensation order, finding, or decision shall be binding upon the carrier in the same manner and to the same extent as upon the employer.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §35, 44 Stat. 1441; Pub. L. 92–576, §15(i), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1262; Pub. L. 98–426, §27(a)(2), Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1654.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–426 substituted "Secretary" for "commission". See Transfer of Functions note set out under section 902 of this title.

1972—Pub. L. 92–576 inserted reference to the Board in cls. (2) and (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984, see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1972 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as a note under section 902 of this title.
Issue Date: 07/01/08 08-018 -1-

 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

 

Change Notice 08-018 

 

 DELETED: TRANSMITTED: 

 Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 0320 04/04/07 IMC 0320 07/01/08 

2. IP 87127 12/31/02 IP 87127 07/01/08 

3. TI 2515/154 01/12/07 ________ ________ 

TRAINING: None 

REMARKS: IMC 0320 (Operating Reactor Security Assessment Program) has been 

revised to incorporate material controls and accounting into the security 

cornerstone as a key attribute. Two Performance Indicators were 

eliminated per Commission guidance. Changes were made to align 

exhibits with changes in other inspection manual chapters (e.g. IMC 0305, 

“Operating Reactor Assessment Program,” and IMC 0612, “Power 

Reactor Inspection Reports”). Exhibit markings and instructions were 

updated. In addition, Exhibit 1 and the security cornerstone chart were 

updated. 

 IP 87127 (Radiopharmacy Programs) has been revised to incorporate 

NRC’s new definition of byproduct material and regulatory authority over 

naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive material (NARM). 

 TI 2515/154 (Material Control and Accounting at Nuclear Power Plants 

and Wet Storage Sites) has been deleted because it is closed. Per 

SECY-08-005, the inspection requirements formally under TI 2515/154 are 

being incorporated into the security cornerstone of the Reactor Oversight 

Program (ROP). 

DISTRIBUTION: Standard 

END
### §150410. Duty to maintain tax-exempt status

The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LI, §5103(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 937.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in text, is classified to Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
### §40725. National Forensic Science Commission

#### (a) Appointment

The Attorney General shall appoint a National Forensic Science Commission (in this section referred to as the "Commission"), composed of persons experienced in criminal justice issues, including persons from the forensic science and criminal justice communities, to carry out the responsibilities under subsection (b).

#### (b) Responsibilities

The Commission shall—

(1) assess the present and future resource needs of the forensic science community;

(2) make recommendations to the Attorney General for maximizing the use of forensic technologies and techniques to solve crimes and protect the public;

(3) identify potential scientific advances that may assist law enforcement in using forensic technologies and techniques to protect the public;

(4) make recommendations to the Attorney General for programs that will increase the number of qualified forensic scientists available to work in public crime laboratories;

(5) disseminate, through the National Institute of Justice, best practices concerning the collection and analyses of forensic evidence to help ensure quality and consistency in the use of forensic technologies and techniques to solve crimes and protect the public;

(6) examine additional issues pertaining to forensic science as requested by the Attorney General;

(7) examine Federal, State, and local privacy protection statutes, regulations, and practices relating to access to, or use of, stored DNA samples or DNA analyses, to determine whether such protections are sufficient;

(8) make specific recommendations to the Attorney General, as necessary, to enhance the protections described in paragraph (7) to ensure—

(A) the appropriate use and dissemination of DNA information;

(B) the accuracy, security, and confidentiality of DNA information;

(C) the timely removal and destruction of obsolete, expunged, or inaccurate DNA information; and

(D) that any other necessary measures are taken to protect privacy; and

(9) provide a forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas and information in furtherance of the objectives described in paragraphs (1) through (8).

#### (c) Personnel; procedures

The Attorney General shall—

(1) designate the Chair of the Commission from among its members;

(2) designate any necessary staff to assist in carrying out the functions of the Commission; and

(3) establish procedures and guidelines for the operations of the Commission.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $500,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 108–405, title III, §306, Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14136c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §153901. Organization

The National Yeomen (F) (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a body corporate and politic in the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1431; Pub. L. 113–237, §3(c)(8)(B), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2840.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 153901 | 36:139 (words before "for patriotic, historical, and educational purposes"). | June 15, 1936, ch. 546, §1 (words before "for patriotic, historical, and educational purposes"), 49 Stat. 1501. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provision for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary and executed words.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237 substituted "Yeomen (F)" for "Yoemen F".
### Revised Toxics Rule RIA Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/15/2011 09:39 PM Bcc: Kevin Culligan, RobertJ Wayland Cortney -- Here is the revised draft Toxics Rule RIA, minus chapter two which will be sent later. Thanks.

CHAPTER 7toxicsruleRIAprofile3-4_March_15_redlinestrikeout.docx Chapter6co-benefitstoxicsruleRIA3-15OMBclean.docx Chapter6co-benefitstoxicsruleRIA 3-15OMBredlinestrikeout.docx Chapter5mercuryHAPbenefitstoxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewclean.docx Chapter5mercuryHAPbenefitstoxicsruleRIA3- 15OMBreviewredlinestrikeout.docx Chapter4AQmodelingtoxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewclean.docx Chapter4AQmodelingtoxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewredlinestrikeout.docx Chapter3_EmissionstoxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewclean.docx Chapter3_EmissionstoxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewredlinestrikeout3.docx Chapter1Exec SummaryToxicsRuleRIA3- 14OMB2_InteragencyComment sUnderEO12866_03142011EPAedits3-15clean.docx Chapter1Exec SummaryToxicsRuleRIA3- 14OMB2_InteragencyCommentsUnd erEO12866_03142011EPAedits3-15redlinestrikeout.docx CHAPTER 11benefit-costcomparisonToxicsRuleRIA_3- 15OMB_Interagencyco mmentsunderEO12866clean.docx CHAPTER 11benefit-costcomparisonToxicsRuleRIA_3- 15OMB_Interagencycomm entsunderEO12866redlinestrikeout.docx Chapter10toxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewclean.docx Chapter10toxicsruleRIA3-15OMBreviewredlinestrikeout.docxChapter 9economicimpactstoxicsruleRIA3- 11OMBreviewclean_Interagencycomm entsunderEO12866clean.docx Chapter 9economicimpactstoxicsruleRIA3- 11OMBreviewclean_Interagencycommentsun derEO12866redlinestrikeout.docx Chapter 8ToxicsRuleRIA3-11OMBreviewclean_I nteragencycommentsunderEO12866_03152011_CAMD response 03-15-11_clean.docx Chapter 8ToxicsRuleRIA3-11OMBreviewclean_I nteragencycommentsunderEO12866_03152011_CAMD response 03-15-11_redlinestrikeout.docx CHAPTER 7toxicsruleRIAprofile3-4_March_15_clean.docx AppendixFToxics RuleRIA3-11OMBreviewclean.docx AppendixFToxics RuleRIA3-11OMBreviewredlinestrikeout.docx Appendix D - Co-Benefits Appendix to Toxics rule 3-14redlinestrikeoutOMBreview.docx Appendix D - Co-Benefits Appendix to Toxics rule 3-14OMBclean.docx 

### Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt



### Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
### §20501. Organization

American Chemical Society (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1287.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20501 | 36:3201. | Aug. 25, 1937, ch. 762, §§1, 7, 50 Stat. 798, 799. |
| | 36:3207. | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provision for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words.

The text of 36:3207 is omitted as executed and obsolete.
Competition and Consumer Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform: Focus on Retail Competition

APPENDIX B – 

COMMENTS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Commenter Abbreviation

Air Conditioning Contractors of America ACCA

Allegheny Energy, Inc. Allegheny

Alliance for Retail Energy Markets AREM

AARP AARP

Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets CAEM

Cleco Corporation Cleco

Coalition for Fair Competition in Rural Markets CFCRM

Edison Electric Institute EEI

Electric Consumers' Alliance ECA

Electric Power Supply Association EPSA

Electricity Consumers Resource Council ELCON

Enron Corporation Enron

Exelon Corporation Exelon

Florida Public Service Commission FPSC

Green Mountain Energy Company Green Mountain

Illinois Commerce Commission ICC

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission IURC

Industrial Energy Consumers of Pennsylvania, et al. IECP

Maine Public Advocate Office ME PA
B2

Competition and Consumer Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform: Focus on Retail Competition

Maine Public Utilities Commission ME PUC

Maryland Office of People's Counsel MD OPC

Mercatus Center Mercatus

Michigan Public Service Commission MI PSC

MidAmerican Energy MidAmerican

Minnesota Power MinnPower

MG Industries MG

National Alliance for Fair Competition NAFC

National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners NARUC

National Energy Marketers Association NEMA

National Rural Electric Cooperative Association NRECA

New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate NJ Ratepayer

New Power Company New Power

New York State Attorney General NY AG

Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. Northeast

Nuclear Energy Institute NEI

Ohio Consumers' Counsel OCC

Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate PA OCA

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission PA PUC

Potomac Electric Power Company PEPCO

Process Gas Consumers Group PGCG
B3

Competition and Consumer Protection Perspectives on Electric Power Regulatory Reform: Focus on Retail Competition

Public Service Commission of the State of New York NYPSC

Public Utility Commission of Texas TX PUC

Reason Public Policy Institute RPPI

Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC Reliant

Shell Energy Services Co., L.L.C. Shell

Strategic Energy L.L.C. Strategic

Transmission Access Policy Study Group TAPS Group

Utility Workers Union of America and the UWUA and the MUPHT

Massachusetts Union of Public Housing Tenants
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Pure Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jack Hightower, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
        and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.


Dated:  August 2, 2002                     /s/ Jack Hightower
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Jack Hightower,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2  STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NF Energy Saving Corporation of America (the "Company") for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wang, Li Hua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:  *   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  *   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Wang, Li Hua _____________________
Wang, Li Hua Chief Financial Officer  November 13, 2007   This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
LEE APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTORS AVAILABLE ON NRC WEBSITE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today made available the public version of a 

combined license (COL) application for two new reactors at the Lee site in Cherokee County, 

S.C. 

The applicant, Duke Energy, submitted the application and associated information 

Dec. 13. The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC 

Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col.html . 

Duke’s COL application seeks approval to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at the 

site, approximately 35 miles southwest of Charlotte, N.C. The AP1000 is a 1,100 megawatt 

electric pressurized-water reactor design the NRC certified in 2006. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial check of the application to determine 

whether it contains sufficient information required for a formal review. If the application passes 

the initial check, the NRC will “docket,” or accept it for review; this decision is expected early 

next year. If the application is accepted for formal review, the NRC will then notice an 

opportunity for the public to request an adjudicatory hearing on the application. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-172 December 28, 2007
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
And under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard David Scott, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this Quarter Report on Form 10-QSB of Invicta Group,
Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2006      By: /s/ Richard David Scott
                                 Richard David Scott
                                 Chief Financial Officer

<page>
#### § 297.205 Access to medical records.

When a request for access involves medical or psychological records that the system manager believes requires special handling, the requester should be advised that the material will be provided only to a physician designated by the data subject. Upon receipt of the designation and upon verification of the physician's identity, the records will be made available to the physician, who will have full authority to disclose those records to the data subject when appropriate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-52240) pertaining to the Catuity Inc. Stock Option Plan, the Catuity
Inc. 2000 Director Stock Option Plan and certain Employee Options of our report
dated March 8, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Catuity Inc. included in Catuity Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 26, 2002
* District Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting by

designation.

** Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-30618

_____________________

In The Matter Of: ROBERT LEO HACKETT

Debtor

-------------------------

ROBERT LEO HACKETT

Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, INC.; DAVID OESTREICHER;

JANICE CHENIER TAYLOR

Appellees

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-3819)

_________________________________________________________________ August 31, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and PARKER, Circuit Judge , and KAZEN *

, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

Robert L. Hackett appeals the district court’s judgment

affirming the order of the bankruptcy court dismissing his Chapter11 case.

The record reflects that Hackett filed a Chapter 13 case in

October 1997. Two motions for relief from stay were filed, one of

which was granted. The second creditor, Schwegmann Bank & Trust

Company, filed a § 362 motion for relief from the automatic stay in

January 1998, but resolution of the matter was delayed due to

uncertainty whether Hackett’s case would proceed. Schwegmann

renewed its motion in April 1998. Faced with an attempt by the

United States Trustee to dismiss his case for ongoing nonobservance

of Chapter 13 deadlines, Hackett voluntarily dismissed that case

-

on the morning of the hearing date set for Schwegmann’s motion.

The dismissal mooted Schwegmann’s § 362 proceeding.

Three days later, Hacke tt sought relief under Chapter 11 of

the Bankruptcy Code in a new case. The United States Trustee

successfull y moved to dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 109(g)(2).

Hackett appealed the dismissal to the district court which affirmed

and filed a thoughtful opinion in support of its judgment.

On appeal, Hackett has favored us with a four-paragraph brief,

which asserts that he “followed the adv ice of counsel” in

voluntarily dismissing his Chapter 13 case and refiling in Chapter

ll. He provides no record cites and no argument in support of that

assertion. As appellee United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

correctly points out, that is insufficient to preserve the issue

and it is waived. Hackett also attempts to raise the issue whether

§ 109(g)(2) should be strictly en forced or whether, instead, itshould read in appropriate circumstances to include a good faith

exception. S ee In re Ulmer

, 19 F.3d 234 (5 th Cir. 1994). Whatever

may be the answer to that question, it is clear that Hackett would

not qualify for such an exception however it might be configured.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Costs shall

be borne by Hackett.