alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1956

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

coverage of certain self-administered intramuscular and subcutaneous 

drugs under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Mr. GREENWOOD (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. HOLT, Mr. FROST, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island, Mr. 

OWENS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. LEACH, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr. BISHOP of New York, and 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to provide coverage of certain self-administered 

intramuscular and subcutaneous drugs under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1956 IH 

1 SECTION 1. COVERAGE OF CERTAIN SELF-ADMINISTERED 

2 INTRAMUSCULAR AND SUBCUTANEOUS 

3 DRUGS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(s)(2) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)) is amended —

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara7 graph (U); 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara9 graph (V); and 

10 (3) by adding at the end of the following new 

11 subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(W) in the case of a disease where an 

13 intramuscular biological therapy has approval of the 

14 Federal Food and Drug Administration for patient 

15 self-administration upon physician determination of 

16 appropriateness and is covered under subparagraph 

17 (A) or (B) of this paragraph, any intramuscular and 

18 subcutaneous drug and biological with a similar ap19 proved use by such Administration (including the 

20 same biological delivered by intramuscular injection 

21 which is covered by either such subparagraph) with22 out regard to whether there is medical or other su23 pervision with respect to the administration of such 

24 drug or biological;’’. 
3

•HR 1956 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to drugs furnished on or after 

3 January 1, 2004.

Æ
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2048

AN ACT

To extend the period for reimbursement under the

Fishermen’s Protective Act of 1967, and to reauthorize the Yukon River Salmon Act of 2000.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2048

AN ACT

To extend the period for reimbursement under the Fishermen’s Protective Act of 1967, and to reauthorize the

Yukon River Salmon Act of 2000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2048 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Fisheries

3 Reauthorization Act of 2003’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR REIMBURSEMENT

5 UNDER FISHERMEN’S PROTECTIVE ACT OF

6 1967.

7 Section 7(e) of the Fishermen’s Protective Act of

8 1967 (22 U.S.C. 1977(e)) is amended by striking ‘‘2003’’

9 and inserting ‘‘2008’’.

10 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF YUKON RIVER SALMON ACT

11 OF 2000.

12 Section 208 of the Yukon River Salmon Act of 2000

13 (16 U.S.C. 5727) is amended by striking ‘‘2000’’ and all

14 that follows through ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2004 through

15 2008’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 20,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2039

To amend section 376 of title 28, United States Code, to allow a period 

of open enrollment for certain individuals who are elevated to the position 

of chief judge of a district. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2003

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend section 376 of title 28, United States Code, to 

allow a period of open enrollment for certain individuals 

who are elevated to the position of chief judge of a 

district.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPEN ENROLLMENT FOR CERTAIN INDIVID4 UALS ELEVATED TO POSITION OF CHIEF 

5 JUDGE OF A DISTRICT. 

6 Section 376(a)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is 

7 amended—
2

•HR 2039 IH 

1 (1) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘or’’ after 

2 the semicolon; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (G), by adding ‘‘or’’ after 

4 the semicolon; and 

5 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(H) a chief judge of a district;’’. 

8 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subject to subsection (b), 

10 the amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

12 (b) APPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS.—An 

13 individual who became a chief judge of a district during 

14 the period beginning January 1, 2002 and ending on the 

15 date of enactment of this Act, but has not made the notifi16 cation described under section 376(a)(1) of title 28, 

17 United States Code, may come within the purview of sec18 tion 376 of that title if he or she makes such notification 

19 not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of 

20 this Act.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-50344 

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

GILBERTO VALLE-PINADA, also known as Miguel Fernando Valle-Pineda,

also known as Gilberto Valla, also known as Francisco Pineda Maldonado, also

known as Francisco Maldonado, also known as Heriberto Pindea, also known as

Gilberto Pineda Valle, also known as Alberto Rodriguez-Gutierrez, also known

as Herberto Pineda, 

Defendant - Appellant

Consolidated with 

No. 11-50363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

GILBERTO VALLE-PINADA, also known as Francisco Maldonado, also known

as Herberto Pineda, also known as Alberto Rodriguez-Gutierrez, 

Defendant - Appellant

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 1, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk
No. 11-50344 c/w No. 11-50363

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CR-34-1

USDC No. 1:09-CR-375-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto Valle-Pinada

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Valle-Pinada has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as VallePinada’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals

present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

To the extent Valle-Pinada suggests that counsel provided ineffective

assistance, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of his

claim at this time; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal

when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity

existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v.

Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
§ 550.1634 Leave and other paid time off. ( a ) An agent is subject to the rules governing leave accrual and usage under 5 U.S.C. chapter 63 on the same basis as other employees. The tour of duty for leave accrual and usage purposes is the basic workweek, which excludes regularly scheduled overtime hours within the regular tour of duty established under this subpart. The agent must be charged corresponding amounts of leave for each hour (or part thereof) the agent is absent from duty during regular time (except that full days off for military leave must be charged when required).
( b ) An agent is subject to the normally applicable rules governing other types of paid time off (such as holiday time off under 5 U.S.C. chapter 61, compensatory time off for religious observances under subpart J of this part, or compensatory time off for travel under subpart N of this part) on the same basis as other covered employees. The tour of duty used in applying those rules is the basic workweek, which excludes regularly scheduled overtime hours within the regular tour of duty established under this subpart. The agent must be charged corresponding amounts of paid time off for each hour (or part thereof) the agent is absent from duty during regular time.
( c ) In computing a lump-sum annual leave payment under 5 U.S.C. 5551-5552, an overtime supplement for an agent's regularly scheduled overtime hours within the agent's regular tour of duty is included, as provided in § 550.1205(b)(5)(iv).
§ 842.1005 Withholding and contributions. ( a ) During service covered under the conditions established by § 842.1003(a) or (c), the Department of Homeland Security will deduct and withhold from the employee's base pay the amounts required under 5 U.S.C. 8422(a) and submit that amount to OPM in accordance with payroll office instructions issued by OPM.
( b ) During service described in paragraph (a) of this section, the Department of Homeland Security must submit to OPM the Government contributions required under 5 U.S.C. 8423(a) in accordance with payroll office instructions issued by OPM.
( c ) If the correct withholdings and/or Government contributions are not timely submitted to OPM for any reason whatsoever, including cases in which it is finally determined that past service of a current or former employee was subject to the higher deduction and Government contribution rates, the Department of Homeland Security must correct the error by submitting the correct amounts (including both employee and agency shares) to OPM as soon as possible. Even if the Department of Homeland Security waives collection of the overpayment of pay under any waiver authority that may be available for this purpose, such as 5 U.S.C. 5584, or otherwise fails to collect the debt, the correct amount must still be submitted to OPM as soon as possible.
( d ) Upon proper application from an employee, former employee or eligible survivor of a former employee, the Department of Homeland Security will pay a refund of erroneous additional withholdings for service that is found not to have been covered service. If an individual has paid to OPM a deposit or redeposit, including the additional amount required for covered service, and the deposit is later determined to be erroneous because the service was not covered service, OPM will pay the refund, upon proper application, to the individual, without interest.
( e ) The additional employee withholding and agency contributions for covered service properly made are not separately refundable, even in the event that the employee or his or her survivor does not qualify for a special annuity computation under 5 U.S.C. 8415(d).
( f ) While an employee who does not hold a primary or secondary position is detailed or temporarily promoted to such a position, the additional withholdings and agency contributions will not be made.
( g ) While an employee who holds a primary or secondary position is detailed or temporarily promoted to a position that is not a primary or secondary position, the additional withholdings and agency contributions will continue to be made.
# L_2017165EN.01000101.xml

| 28.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 25 November 2016, will enter into force on 30 June 2017.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 108, 26.4.2017, p. 3.

1

---
§ 842.101 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This subpart contains regulations concerning automatic coverage under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). References to FERS coverage in this subpart are to automatic, as opposed to elective, FERS coverage.
( b ) Part 846 of this chapter contains regulations concerning elective FERS coverage. FERS elections are available under limited circumstances to employees not subject to automatic FERS coverage.
[59 FR 64282, Dec. 14, 1994]
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Kenneth Shenkman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of W-candy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September
 30, 2005  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of W-Candy, Inc

   June 20, 2006

                By:/s/ Kenneth Shenkman
                Kenneth Shenkman, CFO and Chief and Principal Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT23**

 

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

 

 

 

The Board ofDirectors

Bancorp RhodeIsland, Inc.

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8, FileNos. 333-46438, 333-89148, 333-107130, 333-118293, 333-122968 and 333-126151, of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. ofour reports dated March 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes inshareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and theeffectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December31, 2005, which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BancorpRhode Island, Inc. and to reference to our firm under the heading “SelectedFinancial Data”.

 
| /s/  KPMG LLP |
|---------------|

 

Providence, RhodeIsland

March 6, 2006

 

 

 

----
1N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF SONJA L. POSPISIL FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN

THE BAR OF MONTANA

V

AUG 0 4 2020

Gr..:e.r1VN/00(.1

Coun

Sonja L. Pospisil has petitioned this Court for reinstatementtadtiVestatus in the

State Bar of Montana. Pospisil was placed on inactive status in January 2020 for failing to

comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending

March 31, 2019. Attached to the Petition is a letter from the State Bar stating that Pospisil

has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year. The Petition states that

Pospisil is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts

or omissions sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status.

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Sonja L. Pospisil for reinstatement

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state lidense tax to the State Bar of Montana, Pospisil shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this -7 day of August, 2020.

LAsvg_05%

08/04/2020

Case Number: PR 06-0544
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51092

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISAAC DWAYNE CALDWELL, also known as Isaac Caldwell, also known as 

Issac Caldwell, also known as Issac Dwayne Caldwell, also known as Isaac 

Coldwell, also known as Ahmad Devon Haywood,

Defendant-Appellant

Cons. w/ No. 13-51094

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISAAC CALDWELL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:09-CR-90-1

USDC No. 1:11-CR-456-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 13-51092 Document: 00512751341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
No. 13-51092

c/w No. 13-51094

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isaac Dwayne 

Caldwell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Caldwell has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

2

 

 Case: 13-51092 Document: 00512751341 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0029 - State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses - Reporting Offsite Health Consequences

Accession Number: ML080310014

Date Released: Thursday, March 20, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML080310041 - SECY-08-0029 - State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses - Reporting Offsite Health Consequences (11 page(s), 3/4/2008)
    - ML080310047 - SECY-08-0029 - Enclosure:  Assessment of Latent Health Effects Attributable to Ionizing Radiation and Public Communication of Offsite Consequences (8 page(s), 3/4/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 843.503 Commencing and terminating dates. ( a ) An annuity under this subpart commences on the day after the retiree dies.
( b ) An annuity under this subpart terminates on the last day of the month before the insurable interest beneficiary dies.
( c ) A survivor annuity accrues on a daily basis, one-thirtieth of the monthly rate constituting the daily rate. An annuity does not accrue for the 31st day of any month, except in the initial month if the survivor's (of a deceased employee) annuity commences on the 31st day. For accrual purposes, the last day of a 28-day month constitutes 3 days and the last day of a 29-day month constitutes 2 days.
### §46d–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §506(k)(5), formerly §506(h)(5), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1508, renumbered §506(i)(5), Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, renumbered §506(j)(5), Pub. L. 96–304, title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, renumbered §506(k)(5), Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189

Section, Pub. L. 90–57, July 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 130, authorized payment from contingent fund of Senate of charges for long distance telephone calls by Senators. See section 6314 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 92–607, ch. V, §506(k), formerly §506(h), Oct. 31, 1972, 86 Stat. 1507, renumbered §506(i) by Pub. L. 95–391, title I, §108(a), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 773, renumbered §506(j) by Pub. L. 96–304 title I, §101, July 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 889, and renumbered §506(k) by Pub. L. 97–276, §101(e), Oct. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 1189, provided that the repeal is effective Jan. 1, 1973.
First Union Commercial Corporation




 EXHIBIT 4.30 
  
 FIRST UNION COMMERCIAL CORPORATION 
  
 USA TRUCK, INC. 
  
 November 3, 2003 
  
 Mr. Craig Shelly 
 Treasurer 
 USA Truck, Inc. 
 3200 Industrial Park Road 
 Van Buren,
Arkansas 72956 
  
 Dear Mr. Shelly: 
  
 We are pleased to present our proposal for lease of equipment from First Union Commercial
Corporation. The enclosed proposal exhibit contains additional information regarding this proposal and is incorporated herein by reference. If the terms are mutually satisfactory, they will be incorporated in an Equipment Lease agreement which will
be executed by the parties. 
  
 The lease proposal is as follows: 
  

	1.	LESSEE: USA Truck. 

  

	2.	LESSOR: First Union Commercial Corporation or its nominee. 

  

	3.	EQUIPMENT, LEASE TERM AND LEASE PAYMENT: See attached exhibit(s). 

  

	4.	TYPE OF LEASE: The lease will be a net lease whereby Lessee will be responsible for all expenses related directly or indirectly to the use of the equipment including
maintenance, taxes, insurance coverage, etc. 

  
 Should this
proposal be acceptable in principle, please sign and date the enclosed original of this letter and return it to us as an indication of your acceptance, by the expiration date noted below. As is our standard practice, this proposal is subject to
final approval by our Pricing and Credit Committees and, as such, should not be deemed to be a commitment on the part of First Union. 
  










 We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal and look forward to your favorable acknowledgement of this letter.
In the meantime, we would be pleased to receive any questions or comments that you may have. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	FIRST UNION COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
	
	/s/    JODY ROBERTS        
	

	Jody Roberts
	Director

  

			
	ACCEPTED PROPOSAL EXHIBIT NO.     
	
	USA TRUCK
	 (Seal)

		
	By:	 	/s/    CLIFF BECKHAM        
	 	 	

	 Title
	 	CFO
	Date:	 	12/03/03


  
 THIS PROPOSAL SHALL EXPIRE ON
December 3, 2003 UNLESS ACCEPTED BY LESSEE PRIOR TO THAT DATE.