alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### B. E. Buckley, trading as Colonial Mercantile Agency, Appellee, v. R. H. Robertson, Appellant.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Marion county; the Hon. Thomas M. Jett, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 1, 1914.

*604Statement of the Case.

Action by B. E. Buckley, trading as Colonial Mercantile Agency, against B. H. Bobertson, on a promissory note for fifty dollars, payable to the Colonial Mercantile Agency and signed by the defendant. The defense was, failure of consideration for the note. From a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff on a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence, defendant appeals.

Noleman & Smith, for appellant.

Bundy & Wham, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Bills and notes, § *434*
      ***
      *—when rejection of testimony offered to prove failure of consideration not error.*In an action on a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiff for the right to share the benefits of plaintiff’s Mercantile Agency, where the defense was failure of consideration, rejection of testimony offered to show that a representative of plaintiff at the time of making the contract stated that the Agency had ability to collect desperate claims and that it had facilities for collecting claims in every State and town, *held*not error where the offer contained no proposal to show that such representations were false.

2. Bills and notes, § *434*
      ***
      *—when testimony to prove failure of consideration inadmissible.*In an action on a promissory note given by defendant to plaintiff for the right to share the benefits of plaintiff’s Mercantile Agency, where the defense was failure of consideration, “sustaining an objection to a question asked of defendant as to whether the Agency had a representative in a city where defendant conducted his business, the proposal for the testimony being to show that an agent of the Agency had said that the Agency had facilities for collecting claims in every city and town, *heh}*not error since the representations of the agent could be true whether the Agency had a representative in such city at the time or not, and it further appearing that the list of defendant’s debtors sent to plaintiff did not contain the address of all the debtors, that the *605contract was still in force and that there was no time fixed for the making of collections.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

*604Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

*6053. Trial, § *93*
      ***
      *—necessity of specific objection to evidence.*Objections on a trial to a paper or other evidence must be specifically pointed out so that it may be obviated if possible.

4. Bills and notes, § *479*
      ***
      *—when party cannot complain of want of proof of ownership of note.*Where defendant in an action on a note objected to plaintiff’s proof of his ownership of the note and the objection was sustained, he cannot complain of want of such proof.
# L_2014079EN.01000102.xml

| 18.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation

The renewal of the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation, signed on 16 November 2000
   (1) and renewed in 2003 (2), 2009 (3) and 2014 (4), has, in accordance with Article 12(a) thereof, entered into force on 14 February 2014. The renewal of the Agreement for a further period of 5 years, in accordance with Article 12(b) thereof, is effective as from 20 February 2014.

1

2

3

4

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 28.11.2000, p. 14.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 92, 4.4.2009, p. 3.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 32, 1.2.2014, p. 1.

4

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofYFC 355 Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65228-65229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Title Council of America

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative

[[Page 65229]]

Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the 
Act''), Title Council of America (``TCA'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Title Council 
of America, Anderson, SC. The nature and scope of TCA's standards 
development activities are: Standard specifications for the 
installation of ceramic tile, for ceramic title installation materials, 
and for ceramic tile including tile, porcelain tile, glass tile, and 
special purpose tile.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25076 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
##### 



December 21, 2005
 Amendment to Alfred H. Racine III Employment Agreement
With Catuity Inc. Dated September 23, 2004
As Amended Effective September 7, 2005
  The following paragraphs are added at the end of .Section 10 (a) Stock Options & Restricted Stock
Grant.:
     Signed: /s/ Clifford W. Chapman
    
    Signed: /s/ Alfred H. (John) RacineClifford W. Chapman
    
    Alfred H. (John) RacineChairman, Compensation Committee
    
    President & CEO(By Order of the Board)
    
    December 21, 2005December 21, 2005
 42
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 04-122] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of prospective patent license. 

# SUMMARY:

NASA hereby gives notice that Kid Saver, Incorporated, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has applied for an exclusive license to practice the invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 6,714,132 entitled “Self-Activating System and Method for Alerting When an Object or a Person is Left Unattended,” and NASA Case No. LAR 16324-2 entitled “Self-Activating System and Method for Alerting When an Object or a Person is Left Unattended,” both of which are assigned to the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent to NASA Langley Research Center. NASA has not yet made a determination to grant the requested license and may deny the requested license even if no objections are submitted within the comment period. 

# DATES:

Responses to this notice must be received by November 29, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Helen Galus, Patent Attorney, Mail Stop 212, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681-2199, (757) 864-3227; Fax 757-864-9190. 

Dated: November 2, 2004. 

Keith T. Sefton, 

Deputy General Counsel (Administration and Management). 

[FR Doc. 04-25121 Filed 11-10-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
### §190301. Definition

For purposes of this chapter, "State" includes the District of Columbia and the territories and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1449.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190301 | 36:5117. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §1838, 106 Stat. 2586. |

Section

The words "the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands" are omitted as included in "the territories and possessions of the United States".
EXHIBIT 10.27  


EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

between James P. Ulm, II ("Executive") and

Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation ("Company"),

dated effective February 1, 2003  


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an "Executive Employment Agreement" bearing an original "Effective
Date" of February 1, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS, February 1, 2004, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the "Renewal Date" in that Executive Employment Agreement;
and 


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as
to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit February 1, 2006); and 



        WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce
Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and 


        WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and after the date of
this Extension Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the
experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and 


        WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and
approved by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Company. 


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, and in consideration of the sum
of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows: 


        1.     The
Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an "Effective Date" of February 1, 2003 and a "Renewal Date" which is deemed herein to be
February 1, 2004, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2005 and ending January 31, 2006, unless such employment period is
hereafter further extended for an additional period by both Executive and Company. 



        2.     All
provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company dated as of February 1, 2003, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full
force and effect 








without
change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2004. 



	 	 	POGO PRODUCING COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/S/ JOHN O. McCOY, JR.
 John O. McCoy, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	

ATTEST:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/S/ JOE ANN KINGDON
 Assistant Corporate Secretary	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

EMPLOYEE:
	

 	
 	

/S/ JAMES P. ULM, II
 James P. Ulm, II

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### §132. National School Lunch Week

(a) Designation.—The week beginning on the second Sunday in October is National School Lunch Week.

(b) Proclamation.—The President is requested to issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe National School Lunch Week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1260.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 132(a) | 36:168 (words before comma). | Oct. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–780, 76 Stat. 779. |
| 132(b) | 36:168 (words after comma). | |

Section
Order entered April 24, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01201-CR

GERRICK ANTHONY HAWTHORNE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-52867-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 23, 2020 motion to supplement the 

record. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia 

Pitre to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the signed jury charge on 

guilt/innocence and the signed jury charge on punishment WITHIN TEN DAYS

of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
#### Jose M. Amezaga, Respondent, *v.*Celestino Fernandez and Others, Appellants.

Appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 29th day of March, 1915, as grants hhe plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars eosts and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, *891upon the ground that there is no affidavit presented by the plaintiff explaining the reason for the failure to include in the original complaint the fact now sought to be set up in the amended complaint, or setting forth his grounds for believing the new allegations contained in the amended complaint, nor is his failure to present such affidavit properly excused, with leave to renew the motion upon proper papers. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew the motion upon proper papers.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-3337; MB Docket No. 04-150; RM-10857]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Burlington and Trenton, NJ

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In response to petition for rule making filed by Nassau 
Broadcasting, ll, L.L.C. this document reallots Channel 248B from 
Trenton to Burlington, New Jersey, and modifies the Station WPST 
license to specify operation on Channel 248B at Burlington. See 69 FR 
25874, May 10, 2004. The reference coordinates for the Channel 248B 
allotment at Burlington, NewJersey, are 40-14-05 and 74-46-02. With 
this action, the proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective December 10, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418-
2177.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Report and Order 
in MB Docket No. 04-150 adopted October 20, 2004, and released October 
25, 2004. The full text of this decision is available for inspection 
and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference 
Information Center at Portals ll, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and 
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 
20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The 
Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order in a report to be 
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New Jersey, is 
amended by removing Channel 248B at Trenton, and adding Burlington, 
Channel 248B.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-24829 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 831.404 Procedure for making voluntary contributions. ( a ) To make voluntary contributions to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, an eligible individual must first apply on a form prescribed by OPM. OPM will establish a voluntary contribution account for each eligible individual who elects to make voluntary contributions and notify the individual that a voluntary contribution account has been established. An eligible individual may not make voluntary contributions until notified by OPM that an account has been so established.
( b ) After receiving notice from OPM under paragraph (a) of this section, an eligible individual may forward voluntary contributions to the Office of Personnel Management, at the address designated for that purpose. Voluntary contributions must be in the amount of $25 or multiples thereof, by money order, draft, or check payable to OPM.
( c ) The total voluntary contributions made by an employee or Member may not exceed, as of the date any contribution is received, 10 percent of the aggregate basic pay received by the eligible individual. ( 1 ) Employees are responsible for not exceeding the 10 percent limit.
( 2 ) When the employee retires or withdraws the voluntary contributions, OPM will check to determine whether the 10 percent limit has been exceeded.
( 3 ) If the total of voluntary contributions received from the employee exceeds the 10 percent limit, OPM will refund without interest any amount that exceeds the 10 percent limit.
No: II-08-028 May 1, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2007 PERFORMANCE OF 

ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Wednesday, 

May 7, with representatives of Progress Energy to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety 

performance during 2007 at the Robinson nuclear plant, located near Hartsville, S.C. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 1:30 p.m. in the 

Hartsville Public Library, 147 W. College Avenue in Hartsville. After the formal presentation, 

NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance of 

Robinson, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant operation. 

“The NRC continually inspects and reviews the performance of Robinson and all 

commercial nuclear plants, issuing inspection reports throughout the year and an overall 

assessment at year’s end,” Acting NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree said. “This 

meeting is an opportunity to discuss our assessment with the company, local officials and people 

living near the plant, and to answer any questions they may have.” 

The NRC said the Robinson plant operated safely during the 2007 assessment period, 

from Jan. 1 through Dec. 31. All inspection findings were “green” and of very low safety 

significance, and all performance indicators showed the plant operating at a level that does not 

require additional NRC oversight. Therefore, the NRC is conducting only its regular, baseline 

inspections at the plant during 2008. 

When assessing nuclear plant performance, the NRC uses color-coded performance 

indicators and inspection findings. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” 

“yellow” or “red” based on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2007 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/rob_2007q4.pdf . 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
Current performance information for the Robinson plant is available on the NRC web site 

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ROB2/rob2_chart.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.