alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12,543.

#### People ex rel. Colorado Bar Association *v.*Kelley.

(18 P. [2d] 1118)

Decided February 6, 1933.

Mr. Robert E. Winbourn, Attorney General, Mr. Charles Roach, Deputy, Mr. Oliver Dean, Assistant, Mr. John S. Underwood, Attorney General, Mr. Ralph L. Carr, for petitioner.

Mr. Lewis deR. Mowry, Mr. Horace N. Hawkins, for respondent.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a discipline case. After issues were joined, a reference was made to our associate Mr. Justice Burke, who heard the matter and has filed his report finding the charges unsupported by the evidence. No objections to that finding were filed.

The finding is accordingly approved and the proceeding dismissed.

Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Burke not participating.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2059

To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State of New Mexico 

as a National Historic Landmark, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2003

Mr. PEARCE (for himself, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, and Mrs. WILSON of 

New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State 

of New Mexico as a National Historic Landmark, and 

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORT BAYARD NATIONAL HISTORIC LAND4 MARK ACT. 

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

6 ‘‘Fort Bayard National Historic Landmark Act’’. 

7 (b) DESIGNATION.—The Fort Bayard Historic Dis8 trict in Grant County, New Mexico, as listed on the Na-
2

•HR 2059 IH 

1 tional Register of Historic Places, is hereby designated as 

2 the Fort Bayard National Historic Landmark. 

3 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—Nothing in this section shall 

4 affect the administration of the Fort Bayard Historic Dis5 trict by the State of New Mexico. 

6 (d) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary, in 

7 consultation with the State of New Mexico, Grant County, 

8 New Mexico, and affected subdivisions of Grant County, 

9 may enter into cooperative agreements with appropriate 

10 public or private entities, for the purposes of protecting 

11 historic resources at Fort Bayard and providing edu12 cational and interpretive facilities and programs for the 

13 public. The Secretary shall not enter into any agreement 

14 or provide assistance to any activity affecting Fort Bayard 

15 State Hospital without the concurrence of the State of 

16 New Mexico. 

17 (e) TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.—The 

18 Secretary may provide technical and financial assistance 

19 with any entity with which the Secretary has entered into 

20 a cooperative agreement under subsection (d). 

21 (f) NO EFFECT ON ACTIONS OF PROPERTY OWN22 ERS.—Designation of the Fort Bayard Historic District 

23 as a National Historic Landmark shall not prohibit any 

24 actions which may otherwise be taken by any property 
3

•HR 2059 IH 

1 owners, including the owners of the Fort Bayard National 

2 Historic Landmark, with respect to their property. 

3 (g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

4 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

5 necessary to carry out this section.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24671]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1310-01; WYW144595]

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW144595 for lands in 
Fremont County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was 
accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated 
under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessees have agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessees have 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessees 
have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out 
in section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW144595 effective April 1, 2003, under the original 
terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty 
rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the 
lands.

Theresa M. Stevens,
Acting Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 04-24671 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
```
# L_2019128EN.01002301.xml

| 16.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 128/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 128/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 131/2017

of 7 July 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/738]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/542 of 22 March 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures by adding an Annex on harmonised information relating to emergency health response (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/542 of 22 March 2017 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures by adding an Annex on harmonised information relating to emergency health response (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zze (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| — | ‘— | 32017 R 0542: Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/542 of 22 March 2017 (OJ L 78, 23.3.2017, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

‘—

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2017/542 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 8 July 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 July 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 78, 23.3.2017, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2013

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to increase to $1,000 the 

maximum amount of the lump-sum death benefit and to allow for payment of such a benefit, in the absence of an eligible surviving spouse 

or child, to the legal representative of the estate of the deceased individual. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2003

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to increase 

to $1,000 the maximum amount of the lump-sum death 

benefit and to allow for payment of such a benefit, 

in the absence of an eligible surviving spouse or child, 

to the legal representative of the estate of the deceased 

individual.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2013 IH 

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM LUMP-SUM DEATH 

2 BENEFIT AND ELIGIBILITY OF LEGAL REP3 RESENTATIVE OF ESTATE. 

4 Section 202(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 402(i)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘$255’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,000’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘death.’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘death; or’’; and 

11 (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(3) if there is no person who qualifies for pay14 ment under paragraph (1) or (2), or if such person 

15 dies before receiving payment, to the legal represent16 ative of the estate of the deceased individual, if 

17 any.’’. 

18 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

19 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

20 respect to deaths occurring on or after the date of the 

21 enactment of this Act.

Æ
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EARLY HARRIS, III

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 792

TANYA MICHELLE HARRIS

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed March 29, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Br evard County

, Tonya B. Rainwater , Judge.

Angela Lynn Leiner, of The Law Office of Angela L

. Leiner, P

. A

. , St

. Petersburg, for Appellant.

John J

. Albert, of Albert & Donnelly

, LLC, Melbourne, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED. See Tramble v. Tramble , 193 So. 3d 1105 , 1105 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)

(holding that in absence of transcript or statement of evidence, appellate court’s review

is lim ited to errors appearing on face of final judgment or in pleadings and other matters

in r ecord); Spreng v. Spreng , 162 So. 3d 168, 169 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (holding that

although trial court’s order awarding wife attorney’s fees was deficient in its factual2

findings, error was not preserved for appeal because husband never filed motion for

rehe aring); Hedstrom v. Hedstrom , 123 So. 3d 150, 152 n. 4 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)

( reiterating that party cannot complain on appeal about inadequate findings unless

al leged defect was brought to trial court’s att ention in motion for rehearing).

SAWAYA, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ. , concur.
§ 831.651 Commencing and terminating dates of survivor annuities. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, current spouse annuities, former spouse annuities, children's survivor annuities, and survivor annuities for beneficiaries of insurable interest annuities under CSRS begin to accrue on the day after death of the employee, Member, or retiree.
( b ) ( 1 ) A current spouse annuity begins to accrue— ( i ) Upon attainment of age 50 when, under section 12 of the Civil Service Retirement Act Amendments of February 29, 1948, the annuity is deferred until age 50; or
( ii ) Upon OPM's receipt of a claim for an annuity authorized for unremarried widows and widowers by section 2 of the Civil Service Retirement Act Amendments of June 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 218.
( 2 ) A former spouse annuity begins to accrue— ( i ) For annuities under § 831.683, on the later of the day after date of death of the retiree or the first day of the second month after the date the application for annuity is received in OPM; or
( ii ) For annuities when a former spouse annuity is authorized by court order under section 8341(h) of title 5, United States Code, on the later of the day after the date of death of the employee, Member, or retiree or the first day of the second month after the court order awarding the former spouse annuity and the supporting documentation required by § 838.721 or § 838.1005 of this chapter are received in OPM.
( c ) A survivor annuity terminates at the end of the month preceding death or any other terminating event.
( d ) A current spouse annuity terminated for reasons other than death may be restored under conditions defined in sections 8341(e)(2) and 8341(g) of title 5, United States Code.
( e ) A survivor annuity accrues on a daily basis, one-thirtieth of the monthly rate constituting the daily rate. An annuity does not accrue for the 31st day of any month, except in the initial month if the survivor's (of a deceased employee) annuity commences on the 31st day. For accrual purposes, the last day of a 28-day month constitutes 3 days and the last day of a 29-day month constitutes 2 days.
( f ) Initial cost-of-living increases on current and former spouse annuities, and annuities to beneficiaries of insurable interest annuities are prorated under section 8340(c) of title 5, United States Code.
[50 FR 20070, May 13, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 31933, Sept. 8, 1986; 55 FR 9102, Mar. 12, 1990; 57 FR 33597, July 29, 1992; 58 FR 52881, Oct. 13, 1993. Redesignated at 58 FR 52882, Oct. 13, 1993]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1985 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage 
amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located 
                          in high-cost areas.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1985

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage 
amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located 
                          in high-cost areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Multifamily Loan Limit 
Adjustment Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. MAXIMUM MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMIT FOR MULTIFAMILY HOUSING IN HIGH-
              COST AREAS.

    In the National Housing Act, sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 
220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 
231(c)(2)(B), and 234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 
1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 
1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B)), and 1715y(e)(3)(B)) are each 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``110 percent'' and inserting ``170 
        percent''; and
            (2) by striking ``140 percent'' and inserting ``170 
        percent''.

SEC. 3. CATCH-UP ADJUSTMENTS TO CERTAIN MAXIMUM MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMITS.

    (a) Section 207 Limits.--Section 207(c)(3) of the National Housing 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3)) is amended by striking ``$11,250'' and 
inserting ``$17,460''.
    (b) Section 213 Limits.--Section 213(b)(2)(A) of the National 
Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715e(b)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$38,025'', ``$42,120'', ``$50,310'', 
        ``$62,010'', and ``$70,200'' and inserting ``$41,207'', 
        ``$47,511'', ``$57,300'', ``$73,343'', and ``$81,708'', 
        respectively; and
            (2) by striking ``$49,140'', ``$60,255'', ``$75,465'', and 
        ``$85,328'' and inserting ``$49,710'', ``$60,446'', 
        ``$78,197'', and ``$85,836'', respectively.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 302.203 Disqualifying factors. ( a ) The qualification standards established by an agency or by an administrative level or subdivision of an agency may provide that certain reasons disqualify an applicant for appointment. The following, among others, may be included as disqualifying reasons: ( 1 ) Dismissal from employment for delinquency or misconduct;
( 2 ) Criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct;
( 3 ) Intentional false statement or deception or fraud in examination or appointment;
( 4 ) Habitual use of intoxicating beverages to excess;
( 5 ) Reasonable doubt as to the loyalty of the person involved to the Government of the United States;
( 6 ) Any legal or other disqualification which makes the individual unfit for service; or
( 7 ) Lack of United States citizenship.
( b ) An agency may not disqualify an applicant solely because of his/her retired status.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2167

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit the disabled 

surviving spouse of an individual to elect to retain private health insurance as the primary payor of health insurance benefits under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2003

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

the disabled surviving spouse of an individual to elect 

to retain private health insurance as the primary payor 

of health insurance benefits under the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2167 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ELECTION OF PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE AS 

2 PRIMARY PAYOR UNDER THE MEDICARE 

3 PROGRAM FOR DISABLED SURVIVING 

4 SPOUSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1862(b)(1)(E) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(b)(1)(E)) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(iv) ELECTION OF DISABLED SUR9 VIVING SPOUSES TO RETAIN GROUP

10 HEALTH PLAN AS PRIMARY PAYOR.—In the 

11 case of a surviving spouse who is a dis12 abled person and who, on the date that 

13 preceded the death of the deceased spouse, 

14 was covered under a group health plan by 

15 virtue of the deceased spouse, the surviving 

16 spouse may elect, in a form and manner 

17 specified by the Secretary, to retain the 

18 group health plan as primary payor under 

19 this title. Unless otherwise provided, such 

20 an election shall take effect immediately 

21 upon its execution. Such an election, once 

22 made, may not be revoked.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—(1) Subject to paragraph 

24 (2), the amendment made by subsection (a) shall take ef25 fect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 

26 apply with respect to elections made on or after such date. 
3

•HR 2167 IH 

1 (2) In the case of an election under paragraph (1) 

2 by the disabled surviving spouse of an individual who died 

3 before the date of the enactment of this Act, the disabled 

4 surviving spouse may only make an election during the 

5 6-month period that begins on such date.

Æ
### §12472. Purpose

The purpose of this subpart is to reduce domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, and to prevent homelessness by—

(1) protecting the safety of victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking who reside in homeless shelters, public housing, assisted housing, tribally designated housing, or other emergency, transitional, permanent, or affordable housing, and ensuring that such victims have meaningful access to the criminal justice system without jeopardizing such housing;

(2) creating long-term housing solutions that develop communities and provide sustainable living solutions for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking;

(3) building collaborations among victim service providers, homeless service providers, housing providers, and housing agencies to provide appropriate services, interventions, and training to address the housing needs of victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; and

(4) enabling public and assisted housing agencies, tribally designated housing entities, private landlords, property management companies, and other housing providers and agencies to respond appropriately to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, while maintaining a safe environment for all housing residents.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §41402, as added Pub. L. 109–162, title VI, §601, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3031; amended Pub. L. 113–4, title VI, §601(a)(2), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 102.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043e–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 113–4 substituted "subpart" for "part" in introductory provisions.
Exhibit
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofAllied
 Resources, Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedMarch 31, 2010
 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Ruairidh
 Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of
the registrant for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:May
 21, 2010





/s/
 Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh
 Campbell

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A
 signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
 registrant and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

24
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: John Tanner (gpjt@charter.net] 

_.J, , Sent, . . Monday, February 15, 2010 3:12 PM 

• To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 


Subject: .Cape Air Loss 


Dear Dennis DeV8.tlY: 

.. 	 Bigger planes, nigher rates, and less frequent flights are not the answer. 

In addition, Colgan Air's track record is suspect. Cape Air is great! 

Please consider offering Cape Air the contract. 

Sincerely, 

John andLouise Tanner 


Plattsburgh, NY 12901 


1