alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24690]



[[Page 64623]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation; Employees for the Period of January 1, 2005, Through December 
31, 2005

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and 
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2005, 
through December 31, 2005, will remain at 25 percent of covered 
aviation employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of covered 
aviation employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mark Crispi, Office of Aerospace 
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Analysis Branch (AAM-810), 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-8442.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR part 121, appendix I, section V.C, 
the FAA Administrator's decision on whether to change the minimum 
annual random drug testing rate is based on the reported random drug 
test positive rate for the entire aviation industry. If the reported 
random drug test positive rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator 
may continue the minimum random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2003, the 
random drug test positive rate was 0.56%. Therefore, the minimum random 
drug testing rate will remain at 25% for calendar year 2005.
    Similarly, 14 CFR part 121, appendix J, section III.C, requires the 
decision on the minimum annual random alcohol testing rate to be based 
on the random alcohol test violation rate. If the violation rate 
remains less than 0.50%, the Administrator may continue the minimum 
random alcohol testing rate at 10%. In 2003, the random alcohol test 
violation rate was 0.10%. Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing 
rate will remain at 10% for calendar year 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual 
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code 
of Federal Regulations Title 14: part 121, appendix I, section V.C (for 
drug testing), and appendix J, section III.C (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 29, 2004.
Jon L. Jordan,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 04-24690 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dan W. Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   | ** ** |
|---------------------------|------------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| May 10, 2006              |

 

----
B.C.D. 03-24

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Southwestern States Management Company

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the

continued status of Southwestern States Management Company as an

employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seq.)

(RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351.

et seq.) (RUIA).

Southwestern States was held to be an employer under the Acts

effective February 1, 1978, (B.A. Number 9834). On December 31,

1994, it merged into Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, at that time a

covered employer under the Acts (B.A. No. 1813). On January 1, 1997,

Missouri Pacific merged into the Union Pacific Railroad Company (B.A.

No. 1715).

Accordingly, the Board holds that Southwestern States Management

Company ceased to be an employer under the Railroad Retirement and

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective with the close of

business on December 31, 1994.

9*-

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

Jerome F. Kever

BA#9834
# L_2018073EN.01003801.xml

| 15.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 163/2016

of 26 August 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/384]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council Directive 96/98/EC (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council Directive 96/98/EC (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Directive 2014/90/EU repeals with effect from 18 September 2016 Directive 96/98/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement with effect from 18 September 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Directive 2014/90/EU repeals with effect from 18 September 2016 Directive 96/98/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement with effect from 18 September 2016.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The following point is inserted after point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC):






  ‘2. | 32014 L 0090: Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council Directive 96/98/EC (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

The following point is inserted after point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC):

‘2.

| 2. | The text of point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC) shall be deleted with effect from 18 September 2016. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The text of point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC) shall be deleted with effect from 18 September 2016.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/90/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 27 August 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 46, 17.2.1997, p. 25.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Oil & Gas Co. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, B.J. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 19, 2008


*/s/
                B.J.
                Sparks*B.J. Sparks
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Superior Oil & Gas Co. and will be retained by Superior Oil & Gas Co.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
### §20303. Membership

The corporation may have not more than 50 regular members.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1286.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20303 | 36:4203 (words before 1st comma). | Apr. 17, 1916, ch. 77, §3 (words before 1st comma), 39 Stat. 51. |

Section

The words "may have not more than" are substituted for "shall consist of not more than" for clarity and consistency.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-065 April 11, 2005

 

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES 

TO MEET APRIL 20-21

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes will

hold a public meeting April 20 and 21 in Rockville, Md., where, among other items, members will

meet with NRC Commissioners to provide opinions and recommendations on several technical

matters. Committee members will also discuss proposed guidance that would allow family members to

exceed the regulatory radiation dose limit while caring for a sick relative undergoing radiation

treatment and hear external stakeholder opinions about the presence of physicians during gamma

stereotactic radiosurgery therapy.

The public portion of the meeting will be from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Wednesday and from 10 a.m.

to 4:30 p.m. on Thursday. The meeting will be held at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and

Conference Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, except for the Commission briefing, which will be held at the

Commissioner’s Briefing Room, at the NRC’s White Flint North Building, 11555 Rockville Pike.

Questions from the public will be permitted at the discretion of the committee chairman. Any member

of the public wishing to submit a written statement or needing special assistance must contact Angela

McIntosh, at 301-415-5030 or arm@nrc.gov. A transcript and written comments will be available on

the NRC’s Web site, at www.nrc.gov and through the NRC Public Document Room on or about

July 20, 2005.

###
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Carl Urich, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Global  Envirotech,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2004; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 15, 2003


/s/ Carl Urich
- -----------------------
 Carl Urich, CEO & CFO
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Keith E. Palmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.


/s/ Keith E. Palmer
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President

Date:  November 13, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2076

TYVETTE MCBRIDE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

SSA (Social Security Administration),

Party-in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-00440-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: February 23, 2012 Decided: February 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyvette McBride, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyvette McBride appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) her complaint seeking 

judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of her claims for 

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2011). 

The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) and advised McBride 

that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation 

could waive appellate review of a district court order based 

upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). 

McBride has waived appellate review by failing to file 

objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we 

affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2019254EN.01005001.xml

| 3.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 237/2017

of 15 December 2017

amending Annex VII (Recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1645]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/983 of 24 June 2015 on the procedure for issuance of the European Professional Card and the application of the alert mechanism pursuant to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/983 of 24 June 2015 on the procedure for issuance of the European Professional Card and the application of the alert mechanism pursuant to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 1a (Commission Decision 2007/172/EC) of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘1b. | 32015 R 0983: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/983 of 24 June 2015 on the procedure for issuance of the European Professional Card and the application of the alert mechanism pursuant to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 27).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1b.

32015 R 0983: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/983 of 24 June 2015 on the procedure for issuance of the European Professional Card and the application of the alert mechanism pursuant to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 27).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/983 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 December 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 94/2017 of 5 May 2017 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 27.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 36, 7.2.2019, p. 52.

2

---