alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 591.102 Definitions.

*Agency* means an “Executive agency,” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105.

*Employee* means an employee in or under an agency.

*Category of employees* means any group of employees designated by an agency that has the same basic uniform requirements.

*Head of agency* means the head of an agency or an official who has been delegated the authority to act for the head of the agency in the matter concerned.

*Uniform* means a specified article or articles of clothing that may include, but is not limited to, such items as shoes, boots, hats, shirts, slacks, skirts, or outerwear an employee is required by an agency to wear to provide a distinctive and easily identifiable appearance in performing his or her job. A “uniform” does not include protective equipment required for the employee's safety under 5 U.S.C. 7903 or normal business or work attire purchased at the discretion of the employee.

*Year* means any period of 12 consecutive months designated by an agency as the basis for applying the maximum uniform allowance rates established under this part.
### §60905. Subsequent reviews

#### (a) Case file review

If a review under subsection (a) case file 1 regarding a cold case murder is conducted and a conclusion is reached not to conduct a full reinvestigation, no additional case file review shall be required to be undertaken under this chapter with respect to that cold case murder for a period of five years, unless there is newly discovered, materially significant evidence. An agency may continue an investigation absent a designated person's application.

#### (b) Full reinvestigation

If a full reinvestigation of a cold case murder is completed and a suspect is not identified at its conclusion, no additional case file review or full reinvestigation shall be undertaken with regard to that cold case murder for a period of five years beginning on the date of the conclusion of the reinvestigation, unless there is newly discovered, materially significant evidence.

(Pub. L. 117–164, §6, Aug. 3, 2022, 136 Stat. 1359.)

1 So in original.
### §1328. Aquaculture

#### (a) Authority to permit discharge of specific pollutants

The Administrator is authorized, after public hearings, to permit the discharge of a specific pollutant or pollutants under controlled conditions associated with an approved aquaculture project under Federal or State supervision pursuant to section 1342 of this title.

#### (b) Procedures and guidelines

The Administrator shall by regulation establish any procedures and guidelines which the Administrator deems necessary to carry out this section. Such regulations shall require the application to such discharge of each criterion, factor, procedure, and requirement applicable to a permit issued under section 1342 of this title, as the Administrator determines necessary to carry out the objective of this chapter.

#### (c) State administration

Each State desiring to administer its own permit program within its jurisdiction for discharge of a specific pollutant or pollutants under controlled conditions associated with an approved aquaculture project may do so if upon submission of such program the Administrator determines such program is adequate to carry out the objective of this chapter.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 877; amended Pub. L. 95–217, §63, Dec. 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 1599.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1977—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–217 inserted "pursuant to section 1342 of this title" after "Federal or State supervision".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–217 struck out ", not later than January 1, 1974," after "The Administrator shall by regulation" in existing provisions and inserted provisions that the regulations require the application to the discharge of each criterion, factor, procedure, and requirement applicable to a permit issued under section 1342 of this title, as the Administrator determines necessary to carry out the objectives of this chapter.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–217 added subsec. (c).
### SUBCHAPTER XII—REGIONAL INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEMS
### §190302. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Retired Enlisted Association, Incorporated (in this chapter, the "corporation"), a nonprofit corporation incorporated in Colorado, is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Expiration of Charter.—If the corporation does not comply with any provision of this chapter, the charter granted by this chapter expires.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1449.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190302(a) | 36:5101. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §§1821, 1835 (last sentence), 1837, 106 Stat. 2584, 2586. |
| 190302(b) | 36:5114 (last sentence).36:5116. | |

Section

36:5116.

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
EXHIBIT 32.1
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Manchester  Inc.  (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Richard  D.  Gaines,  Acting  Principal  Executive  Officer of the
Registrant,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



Date:  July 14, 2006              By:  /s/ Richard D. Gaines
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Richard D. Gaines
                                       Title: Acting Principal Executive Officer
                                              Secretary and Director
EXHIBIT 10.30  


EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

between Bruce E. Archinal ("Executive") and

Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation ("Company"),

dated effective February 1, 2003  


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an "Executive Employment Agreement" bearing an original "Effective
Date" of February 1, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS, February 1, 2004, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the "Renewal Date" in that Executive Employment Agreement;
and 


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as
to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit February 1, 2006); and 



        WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce
Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and 


        WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and after the date of
this Extension Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the
experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and 


        WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and
approved by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Company. 


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, and in consideration of the sum
of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows: 


        1.     The
Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an "Effective Date" of February 1, 2003 and a "Renewal Date" which is deemed herein to be
February 1, 2004, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2005 and ending January 31, 2006, unless such employment period is
hereafter further extended for an additional period by both Executive and Company. 



        2.     All
provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company dated as of February 1, 2003, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full
force and effect 








without
change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2004. 



	 	 	POGO PRODUCING COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/S/ JOHN O. McCOY, JR.
 John O. McCoy, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	

ATTEST:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/S/ JOE ANN KINGDON
 Assistant Corporate Secretary	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

EMPLOYEE:
	

 	
 	

/S/ BRUCE E. ARCHINAL
 Bruce E. Archinal

Vice President and Regional Manager—Gulf Coast
### §926. Costs in proceedings brought without reasonable grounds

If the court having jurisdiction of proceedings in respect of any claim or compensation order determines that the proceedings in respect of such claim or order have been instituted or continued without reasonable ground, the costs of such proceedings shall be assessed against the party who has so instituted or continued such proceedings.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §26, 44 Stat. 1438.)
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of BOE Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and for the periods then ended.



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.                    
|George M. Longest, Jr. Chief Executive
Officer
|                                              
|/s/ Bruce E. Thomas                           
|Bruce E. Thomas Chief Financial
Officer       

March 31, 2008
**Exhibit
      32**




The
      following certification accompanies and is furnished in connection with
      Firstwave Technologies, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended June 30, 2006 and is not considered as “filed” as provided in SEC Release
      No’s 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967.








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





The
      undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the
                “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the
                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








Dated:
      August 14,
      2006 /s/
      Richard T. Brock


Richard
      T. Brock


Chief
      Executive Officer











Dated:
      August 14,
      2006 /s/
      Steven R. Deerwester


Steven
      R.
      Deerwester


Controller


(Principal
      Financial Officer)











A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Firstwave Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Firstwave Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
B.C.D. 02-81

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Interstate Quality Services, Inc.

d/b/a Interstate Reloads, Inc.

NOV 1 2 2002

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status ofthe Interstate Quality Services, Inc. (IQS) d/b/a Interstate

Reloads, Inc. (Reloads) (B.A. No. 4647) as a covered employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seg.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seg.) (RUIA). Reloads was ruled to be an

employer under the RRA and RUIA effective March 15, 1989.

According to Lee J. Gullickson, Treasurer ofIowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd. (B.A.

No. 3760), the parent corporation ofIQS, Reloads ceased its business on or about

March 1, 1997. IQS was formally dissolved as a corporation in accordance with

the State ofIllinois, Office ofthe Secretary of State, Certificate of Dissolution of

Domestic Corporation dated October 1, 1997.

Section 202.11 ofthe Board’s regulations (20 CFR 202.1 1) provides that:

The employer status of any company or person shall terminate

whenever such company or person loses any ofthe characteristics

essential to the existence of an employer status.

In view ofthe foregoing information, it is the determination ofthe Railroad

Retirement Board that Interstate Quality Services, Inc. d/b/a Interstate Reloads,

Inc. ceased being an employer under the RRA and RUIA effective October 1,

1997, the date on which it was formally dissolved as a corporation.

Cherry] oT. Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

:rome F. Kever

BA# 4647
### §10421. Grant authorization

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General may make grants under this subchapter to States, for use by States and units of local government for the purpose of—

(1) developing and implementing residential substance abuse treatment programs within State correctional facilities, as well as within local correctional and detention facilities in which inmates are incarcerated for a period of time sufficient to permit substance abuse treatment;

(2) encouraging the establishment and maintenance of drug-free prisons and jails; and

(3) developing and implementing specialized residential substance abuse treatment programs that identify and provide appropriate treatment to inmates with co-occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders or challenges.

#### (b) Consultation

The Attorney General shall consult with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to ensure that projects of substance abuse treatment and related services for State prisoners incorporate applicable components of existing comprehensive approaches including relapse prevention and aftercare services.

#### (c) Additional use of funds

States that demonstrate that they have existing in-prison drug treatment programs that are in compliance with Federal requirements may use funds awarded under this subchapter for treatment and sanctions both during incarceration and after release.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1901, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §32101(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1898; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title II, §§2101, 2102(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1792; Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title XIV, §14012, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1297.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ff of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1901 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2601 and is classified to section 10541 of this title.

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 114–255 added par. (3).

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–273, §2102(1), substituted "purpose of—" for "purpose of", inserted par. (1) designation before "developing", and added par. (2).

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–273, §2101, added subsec. (c).
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2130

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Postal Service located at 121 KinderkamackRoad in River Edge, New Jersey, as the ‘‘NewBridge Landing Post Office’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2130

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 121 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge,

New Jersey, as the ‘‘New Bridge Landing Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2130 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 121 Kinderkamack Road in River Edge, New Jer4 sey, and known as the North Hackensack Station Post

5 Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘New Bridge

6 Landing Post Office’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘New Bridge Landing Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 18,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
# L_2017161EN.01004401.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 262/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1051]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/707 of 30 April 2015 concerning the non-approval of Rheum officinale root extract as a basic substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/707 of 30 April 2015 concerning the non-approval of Rheum officinale root extract as a basic substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 13zzzzt (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘13zzzzu. | 32015 R 0707: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/707 of 30 April 2015 concerning the non-approval of Rheum officinale root extract as a basic substance in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ L 113, 1.5.2015, p. 44).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13zzzzu.

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/707 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 113, 1.5.2015, p. 44.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §154509. Records and inspection

(a) Records.—The corporation shall keep—

(1) correct and complete records of account;

(2) minutes of the proceedings of its members, board of directors, and committees having any of the authority of its board of directors; and

(3) at its principal office, a record of the names and addresses of its members entitled to vote.

(b) Inspection.—A member entitled to vote, or an agent or attorney of the member, may inspect the records of the corporation for any proper purpose, at any reasonable time.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1436.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154509 | 36:2810. | Oct. 19, 1984, Pub. L. 98–520, §10, 98 Stat. 2429. |

Section

In this section, the word "records" is substituted for "books and records" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The words "Nothing in this section shall be construed to contravene any applicable State law" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (a)(2), the words "proceedings of" are substituted for "proceeding of the corporation involving" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
TN: DT-07-09

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Management Directive and Handbook 2.1,

“Information Technology Architecture”

Purpose: Directive and Handbook 2.1 are being eliminated because

they have been consolidated into and replaced by MD 2.8,

“Project Management Methodology (PMM).”

Note: Please remove material under Tab 2.1 and

discard. Do not remove Tab 2.1; it must remain in

place as a reserved number.

Office of Origin: Office of Information Services

Business Process Improvement and Applications Division

Contact: Myron L. Kemerer, 301-415-8735

Date Approved: June 19, 2007

Volume: 2 Information Technology

Directive: 2.1 [RESERVED]

Availability: None

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
#### § 550.606 Reporting exceptions to OPM.

Each agency must notify OPM in writing of any exceptions made under § 550.605.
# Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and subject to fulfilling the requirements of section 614(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to you the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether it is important to the security interests of the United States to use up to $1.3 million in International Military Education and Training (IMET) funds to furnish assistance to Thailand without regard to any other provision of law within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA.

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register.*

[FR Doc. 2018-27694

Billing code 4710-10-P