alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT31.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I,John C. Garrison, certify that:

-  I    have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc.;Based    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a    material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based    on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information    included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the    financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small    business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The    small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible    for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as    defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small    business issuer and have:
(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure    controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that    material information relating to the small business issuer, including its    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being    prepared;

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure    controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end    of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small    business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's    fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business    issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
-  The    small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,    based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial    reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee    of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the    equivalent functions):
(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably    likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,    process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other    employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's    internal control over financial reporting.

Date:December 16, 2004

 

/s/JohnC. Garrison                   

JohnC. Garrison

ChiefFinancial Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03917

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03917\03917_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03917\03917_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03917\03917_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03917\03917_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03917\03917_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03917\03917_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03917\03917_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03917\Certification Statement Plant ID_03917.PDF Plant certification statement

x 03917\Supporting Documentation\03917_Stoneman Supporting Documents.PDF Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information collection. SF 2808, Designation of Beneficiary: Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), is used by persons covered by CSRS to designate a beneficiary to receive the lump sum payment due from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund in the event of their death. 

Approximately 2,000 forms will be completed annually. The form takes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual burden is estimated at 500 hours. 

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, Fax (202) 418-3251 or via E-mail to                         *mbtoomey@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—Pamela S. Israel, Chief Operations Support Group, Retirement Services Program, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3349, Washington, DC 20415; and Joseph F. Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. 

For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination—Contact: Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, Support Group, (202) 606-0623. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

Kay Coles James, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 04-23694 Filed 10-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
### §41104. Processing of fingerprint identification records and name checks by FBI

For fiscal year 1991 and hereafter the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation may establish and collect fees to process fingerprint identification records and name checks for non-criminal justice, non-law enforcement employment and licensing purposes and for certain employees of private sector contractors with classified Government contracts, and notwithstanding the provisions of section 3302 of title 31, credit such fees to this appropriation to be used for salaries and other expenses incurred in providing these services, and that the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation may establish such fees at a level to include an additional amount to establish a fund to remain available until expended to defray expenses for the automation of fingerprint identification and criminal justice information services and associated costs.

(Pub. L. 101–515, title II, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2112; Pub. L. 104–91, title I, §101(a), Jan. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 11, amended Pub. L. 104–99, title II, §211, Jan. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 37.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 534 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Department of Justice Appropriations Act, 1991, and also from the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1991.

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–91 is based on section 113 of H.R. 2076, One Hundred Fourth Congress, as passed by the House of Representatives on Dec. 6, 1995, which was enacted into law by Pub. L. 104–91.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–91, as amended by Pub. L. 104–99, which directed the amendment of this section by inserting "and criminal justice information" after "for the automation of finger-print identification", was executed by making the insertion after "for the automation of fingerprint identification" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No: II-07-036                                               July 9, 2007CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416      E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES CONFERENCE WITH SCE&G TO DISCUSSAPPARENT VIOLATION AT SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with representatives of SouthCarolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) on Monday, July 16, to discuss an apparent violation ofagency requirements related to the emergency plan for the company’s Summer Nuclear Station, locatednear Jenkinsville in central South Carolina.  The apparent violation was identified during an NRCinspection of Summer’s emergency plan.

The conference with SCE&G is scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. (EDT) in the NRC Region IIOffice, at 61 Forsyth Street SW, Suite 23T85, in Atlanta, Ga., and will be open to the public.  Themeeting is between SCE&G and the NRC, but those people attending will have an opportunity to askquestions of NRC staff prior to the end of the meeting.

During late 2006 and early 2007, the NRC reviewed revisions to the emergency plan forSummer and found that, in several cases, the revisions had potentially decreased the effectiveness ofthe emergency plan and resulted in a failure to maintain a standard emergency classification system.The NRC requires nuclear plant operators to maintain a standard emergency classification system to beused in declaring the appropriate emergency level during an event. 

The purpose of the July 16th  meeting is to obtain information that will allow the NRC todetermine what, if any, enforcement action is warranted.   No decision will be made by the NRC staffat the meeting, but NRC management will make a decision sometime in the near future. 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §10753. Review of applications

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall make a grant under section 10751 of this title to carry out the projects described in the application submitted under section 10752 of this title upon determining that—

(1) the application is consistent with the requirements of this subchapter; and

(2) before the approval of the application, the Attorney General has made an affirmative finding in writing that the proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with this subchapter.

#### (b) Approval

Each application submitted under section 10752 of this title shall be considered approved, in whole or in part, by the Attorney General not later than 90 days after first received, unless the Attorney General informs the applicant of specific reasons for disapproval.

#### (c) Restriction

Grant funds received under this subchapter shall not be used for land acquisition or construction projects.

#### (d) Disapproval notice and reconsideration

The Attorney General may not disapprove any application without first affording the applicant reasonable notice and an opportunity for reconsideration.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3053, as added Pub. L. 116–281, §2(a), Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3384.)
Motion Granted, Abatement Order issued August 2, 2012 Withdrawn, and Order 

filed August 14, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00205-CR

____________

DUC HUU DOAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1232619

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Casey Garrett. On July 2, 2012,

time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no motion for extension of time

was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel and the trial court were notified on July 

10, 2012, that no brief had been received. Appellant filed no response, and on August 2, 

2012, this court ordered the appeal abated and directed the trial court to conduct a hearing 

pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) to determine why appellant’s brief had not been filed.
2

On August 8, 2012, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file a brief. 

Appellant’s counsel cited difficulty in obtaining a copy of the record necessary to prepare 

appellant’s brief. According to the motion, counsel waited for the record to be returned to 

the Harris County District Clerk’s office by the attorney handling a related appeal filed 

under our case number 14-12-00050-CR. We note that the appeal in the related case was 

dismissed on March 8, 2012. Nonetheless, we GRANT appellant’s motion for extension 

of time to file appellant’s brief until September 7, 2012. No further extensions will be 

granted absent exceptional circumstances. The court also advises appellant’s counsel 

that this court maintains electronic copies of the appellate record, and counsel may obtain 

a disc containing the electronic record from the office of the Clerk of this court for use in 

preparing appellant’s brief.

Our August 2, 2012, order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to 

conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed in 

WITHDRAWN. The appeal is REINSTATED. 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual report of Lion Capital Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
      T. Page, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


*/s/
                        Timothy T. Page**Timothy
                        T. Page*
                      *Chief
                        Executive Officer and*
                      *Chairman
                        of the Board of Directors*
                      
                      *Date:
                        April 15,
                        2007*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 20-CV-61648-RAR

BRENDA HERNANDEZ, and 

LUIS LUQUE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAM’S EAST, INC.,

Defendant. 

_________________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon United States Magistrate Judge Jared M. 

Strauss’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 78] (“Report”), filed on August 13, 2021. The 

Report recommends that the Court grant Defendant Sam’s East, Inc.’s Verified Memorandum in 

Support of Its Bill of Costs (“Defendant’s Motion”) [ECF No. 61] and deny Plaintiffs’ response 

and incorporated motion to strike (“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike”) [ECF No. 64]. See Report at 1. 

The Report properly notified the parties of their right to object to Magistrate Judge Strauss’s

findings and the consequences for failing to object. Id. at 6. The time for objections has passed 

and no party has filed any objections to the Report. 

When a magistrate judge’s “disposition” has properly been objected to, district courts must 

review the disposition de novo. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). However, when no party has timely 

objected, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in 

order to accept the recommendation.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72 advisory committee’s notes (citation 

omitted). Although Rule 72 itself is silent on the standard of review, the Supreme Court has 

acknowledged Congress’s intent was to only require a de novo review where objections have been 

Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

properly filed, not when neither party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It 

does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate [judge]’s 

factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to 

those findings.”). In any event, the “[f]ailure to object to the magistrate [judge]’s factual findings 

after notice precludes a later attack on these findings.” Lewis v. Smith, 855 F.2d 736, 738 (11th 

Cir. 1988) (citing Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 (5th Cir. 1982)). 

Because no party has filed an objection to the Report, the Court did not conduct a de novo

review of Magistrate Judge Strauss’s findings. Rather, the Court reviewed the Report for clear

error. Finding none, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Report [ECF No. 78] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

2. Defendant’s Motion [ECF No. 61] is GRANTED. Defendant is awarded costs 

in the amount of $6,652.55 and post-judgment interest to be calculated from April 27, 2021, until 

the judgment is satisfied. 

3. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike [ECF No. 64] is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 7th day of September, 2021.

 _________________________________

 RODOLFO A. RUIZ II

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Counsel of record

Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss

Case 0:20-cv-61648-RAR Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/08/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §21742. Interstate initiatives

#### (a) Interstate agreements and compacts

The consent of Congress is given to any two or more States (acting through State agencies with jurisdiction over adult protective services) to enter into agreements or compacts for cooperative effort and mutual assistance—

(1) in promoting the safety and well-being of elders; and

(2) in enforcing their respective laws and policies to promote such safety and well-being.

#### (b) Recommendations on interstate communication

The Executive Director of the State Justice Institute, in consultation with State or local adult protective services, aging, social, and human services and law enforcement agencies, nationally recognized nonprofit associations with expertise in data sharing among criminal justice agencies and familiarity with the issues raised in elder abuse cases, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall submit to Congress legislative proposals relating to the facilitation of interstate agreements and compacts.

(Pub. L. 115–70, title IV, §404, Oct. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 1215.)
Exhibit 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



I, Jane He, Chief Financial Officer of Teryl
Resources Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best
of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources Corp. for the year ended May 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Teryl Resources Corp.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: October 1, 2014 | /s/ Jane He
|--------------------- | -----------
|                      |            
|                      |
#### § 8.2 Appointment of United States citizens.

United States citizens may be recruited overseas for appointment to overseas positions in the competitive service without regard to the competitive requirements of the Civil Service Act. Persons so recruited who meet the qualification standards and other requirements of OPM for overseas positions may be given appointments to be known as “overseas limited appointments.” Such appointments shall be of temporary or indefinite duration, and shall not confer the right to acquire a competitive status. OPM may authorize overseas limited appointments for United States citizens recruited within the continental limits of the United States whenever it determines that it is not feasible to appoint from a civil-service register. Persons serving under appointments made pursuant to this section are hereby excluded from the operation of the Civil Service Retirement Act of May 29, 1930, as amended, unless eligible for retirement benefits by continuity of service or otherwise.