alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2055 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 2055

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 2004

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend Public Law 89-366 to allow for an adjustment in the number of 
    free roaming horses permitted in Cape Lookout National Seashore.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN THE NUMBER OF FREE ROAMING HORSES PERMITTED IN 
              CAPE LOOKOUT NATIONAL SEASHORE, NC.

    (a) In General.--The first subsection (b) of section 5 of Public 
Law 89-366 (16 U.S.C. 459g-4) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``100 free roaming 
        horses'' and inserting ``not less than 110 free roaming horses, 
        with a target population of between 120 and 130 free roaming 
        horses,'';
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph (B) and 
        inserting the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) unless removal is carried out as part of a plan to 
        maintain the viability of the herd; or''; and
            (3) in paragraph (5), by striking ``100'' and inserting 
        ``110''.
    (b) Repeal of Duplicate Subsections.--Section 5 of Public Law 89-
366 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``(a)'' after ``(a)''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the second subsection (b).

            Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §130113. Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation

On dissolution or final liquidation of the corporation, any assets remaining after the discharge of all liabilities shall be distributed as provided by the council of administration, but in compliance with the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1373.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130113 | 36:78p. | June 17, 1959, Pub. L. 86–47, §17, 73 Stat. 80. |

Section

The word "satisfaction" is omitted as included in "discharge", and the word "obligations" is omitted as included in "liabilities". The word "outstanding" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "as provided by" are substituted for "in accordance with the determination of" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words. The reference to the "council of administration" is retained although there is no council of administration created by 36:78e or 36:78f. The words "all Federal and State laws applicable thereto" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### Anna C. Hallstrom, Appellant, v. James T. McCullough and Susan F. McCullough, Appellees.

Gen. No. 20,413.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John M. O’Connor, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1914.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion filed April 13, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Bill by Anna C. Hallstrom against James T. McCullough and Susan F. McCullough on which a tern*15por ary injunction was obtained. From an order dissolving the injunction, complainant appeals.

Martin & Martin, for appellant.

Louis J. Pierson, for appellees.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Appeal and ebbob, § *309*
      ***
      *—when order dissolving injunction*is *interlocutory order.*Where a bill seeks other relief than an injunction, an order dissolving the injunction is an interlocutory order and not in legal effect a final decree dismissing the bill.

2. Appeal and ebbob, § *309*
      ***
      *—right to appeal from interlocutory order dissolving injunction.*Section 123 of the Practice Act, J. *&*A. 1[ 8661, providing for appeals from interlocutory orders does not authorize an appeal from an order dissolving an * See Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, samo tcpic and section number.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §676. Allotment of expenses for common dumping grounds; location of impounding works

In case the joint petition referred to in section 671 of this title is granted, the commission shall fix the respective amounts to be paid by each owner of such mines toward providing and building necessary impounding dams or other restraining works. In the event of a petition being filed after the entry of such order, or in case the impounding dam or dams or other restraining works have already been constructed and accepted by said commission, the commission shall fix such amount as may be reasonable for the privilege of dumping therein, which amount shall be divided between the original owners of such impounding dams or other restraining works in proportion to the amount respectively paid by each party owning same. The expense of maintaining and protecting such joint dam or works shall be divided among mine owners using the same in such proportion as the commission shall determine. In all cases where it is practicable, restraining and impounding works are to be provided, constructed, and maintained by mine owners near or below the mine or mines before reaching the main tributaries of said navigable waters.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §16, 27 Stat. 509.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

California Debris Commission abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Army by Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1106, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4229, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
ATTACHMENT F

Response to Comments

The following includes responses to comments receiv ed at the PAR 2005 Public Workshop on March 3 , 20 11 and dur ing the public comment period.

Comment: If the second and subsequent year RTC holding requirements are being removed for existing RECLAIM facilities, why not remove the same requirements for new RECLAIM facilities?

Response: The original Rule 2005 requirement was due to EPA’s concern over the permanency of emission reductions used to offset emission increases. EPA

intended to ensure that emission offsets under RECLAIM meet the federal permanency requirement set forth in the Emission Offset Interpretation Ruling, 40 CFR Section 51, Appendix S. On this basis, AQMD staff proposed in the initial RECLAIM rulemaking that the permanency requirement would be met by supplying one year’s worth of RTCs, since the RECLAIM facilities operate on an annual basis and must reduce their total emissions annually. On this basis, new RECLAIM facilities must continue to provide one year’s worth of RTCs prior to the actual operation and every year thereafter. 1

1 Reference: RECLAIM Appendix II

- Y, Response to Comments (Comments received from June 26, 1993 through July 23, 1993, New Source Review for RECLAIM, Pg. 18, Comment No.2)
### §200310. Service of process

The corporation shall have a designated agent in the District of Columbia to receive service of process for the corporation. Notice to or service on the agent, or mailed to the business address of the agent, is notice to or service on the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1455.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 200310 | 36:539(b). | Aug. 20, 1954, ch. 774, §9(b), 68 Stat. 751. |

Section

The words "at all times" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "to receive" are substituted for "authorized to accept", and the words "is notice to or service on" are substituted for "shall be deemed notice to or service upon", for consistency in the revised title.
#### § 839.1103 If my qualifying retirement coverage error started when I should have been placed under FERS automatically, but my agency put me in CSRS because I had some past service, will I get a CSRS component in my FERS annuity for the service before the error if I elect FERS?

No, employees who should have been automatically placed in FERS (generally because they did not have 5 years of past service under CSRS rules) do not have a CSRS component in their future FERS benefit. All service must be treated as FERS service in this circumstance.
### **[CHAPTER 1526—TRANSFERRED]**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


EXHIBIT 32.1


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Qlinks America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof.


I, James O. Mulford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

     1.   The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods shown in
          such report.




                                       /s/  James O. Mulford
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James O. Mulford, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 10, 2007
### §21702. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States;

(2) to promote peace and good will among the peoples of the United States and all the nations of the Earth;

(3) to preserve the memories and incidents of the 2 World Wars and the other great hostilities fought to uphold democracy;

(4) to cement the ties and comradeship born of service; and

(5) to consecrate the efforts of its members to mutual helpfulness and service to their country.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1297.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21702 | 36:43. | Sept. 16, 1919, ch. 59, §3, 41 Stat. 285; Oct. 29, 1942, ch. 633, §1, 56 Stat. 1012; July 26, 1955, ch. 386, §1, 69 Stat. 379; Sept. 1, 1966, Pub. L. 89–550, §1, 80 Stat. 371. |

Section

In clause (1), the words "of America" are omitted.
### §170303. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are as provided in its articles of incorporation and include—

(1) upholding and defending the Constitution of the United States;

(2) collating, preserving, and encouraging the study of historical episodes, chronicles, mementos, and events pertaining to "The Day of Infamy, 7 December 1941", and in particular those memories and records of patriotic service performed by the heroic Pearl Harbor survivors and nonsurvivors;

(3) shielding from neglect the graves, past and future, of those who served at Pearl Harbor on that day;

(4) stimulating communities and political subdivisions into taking more interest in the affairs and future of the United States to keep our Nation alert;

(5) fighting unceasingly for our national security to protect the United States from enemies within and without our borders;

(6) preserving the American way of life and fostering the spirit and practice of Americanism; and

(7) instilling love of country and flag and promoting soundness of mind and body in the youth of our Nation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1442.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 170303 | 36:3603. | Oct. 7, 1985, Pub. L. 99–119, §3, 99 Stat. 498. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as unnecessary.
EXHIBIT  32.1
-------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In  connection  with  the  Amended Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
G.  Forhan,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and

2)   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  Report.



Date:  November  2,  2004              /s/  WILLIAM G. FORHAN
                                       ----------------------
                                       WILLIAM G. FORHAN
                                       President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-07-017 June 5, 2007

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE

 AT COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet on June 12, with representatives of 

TXU Power to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at the Comanche

Peak nuclear plant near Glen Rose, Texas.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the

Somervell County Expo Center, 202 Bo Gibbs Blvd., Glen Rose.

The NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the safety

performance of Comanche Peak, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant

operation.

 “The NRC continually reviews the performance of Comanche Peak and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett said. 

“This meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety

performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2006 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cp_2006q4.pdf.

The NRC utilizes color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess

nuclear power plant performance. The colors start with "green" and then increase to "white,"

"yellow" or "red," commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 
The NRC said Comanche Peak operated safely during 2006 and will receive baseline, or

routine inspections, during 2007.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant performance to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are activities associated with

engineering, fire protection, emergency preparedness, maintenance and radiological controls.

Current performance information for Comanche Peak Unit 1 is available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP1/cp1_chart.html and at

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP2/cp2_chart.html for Unit 2.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00640-CR

Tommy Earl Landrum Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 62724, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
2

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

 

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: May 13, 2009

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1918 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1918

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend commissary and 
    exchange store privileges to veterans with a service-connected 
 disability rated at 30 percent or more and to the dependents of such 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2003

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend commissary and 
    exchange store privileges to veterans with a service-connected 
 disability rated at 30 percent or more and to the dependents of such 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVILEGES FOR DISABLED 
              VETERANS.

    (a) Extension of Privileges.--Chapter 54 of title 10, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1066. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans 
              and dependents
    ``(a) Disabled Veterans.--A veteran with a service-connected 
disability rated at 30 percent or more shall be permitted to use 
commissary and exchange stores on the same basis as a member of the 
armed forces entitled to retired pay.
    ``(b) Dependents.--A dependent of a veteran who is permitted under 
subsection (a) to use commissary and exchange stores shall be permitted 
to use such stores on the same basis as a dependent of a member of the 
armed forces entitled to retired pay.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms `veteran' and 
`service-connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 
of title 38.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1066. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans and 
                            dependents.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 576.203 Waivers of the Voluntary Separation Incentive Repayment requirement. ( a ) ( 1 ) If the proposed reemployment is with an agency other than the Government Accountability Office, the United States Postal Service, or the Postal Rate Commission, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management may, at the request of the head of the agency, waive the repayment if— ( i ) The individual involved possesses unique abilities and is the only qualified applicant available for the position; or
( ii ) In case of an emergency involving a direct threat to life or property, the individual— ( A ) Has skills directly related to resolving the emergency; and
( B ) Will serve on a temporary basis only so long as that individual's services are made necessary by the emergency.
( 2 ) If the proposed reemployment is with an entity in the legislative branch, the head of the entity or the appointing official may waive the repayment if the individual involved possesses unique abilities and is the only qualified applicant available for the position.
( 3 ) If the proposed reemployment is with the judicial branch, the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts may waive the repayment if the individual involved possesses unique abilities and is the only qualified applicant available for the position.
( 4 ) The repayment waiver provisions under this section do not extend to a repayment obligation resulting from employment under a personal services contract or other direct contract.
( b ) For a Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment made under statutory authority other than subpart A of this part, the agency should review the authorizing statute and, if a waiver is permitted, submit a request as specified by that statute.
[70 FR 3859, Jan. 27, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 46065, Aug. 9, 2005]
§ 752.606 Agency records. The agency must maintain copies of, and will furnish to the Merit Systems Protection Board and to the appointee upon his or her request, the following documents: ( a ) Notice of the proposed action;
( b ) Appointee's written reply, if any;
( c ) Summary of the appointee's oral reply, if any;
( d ) Notice of decision; and
( e ) Any order effecting the action, together with any supporting material.