alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Air Movement and Control Association 
International, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Air Movement and Control 
Association International, Inc. (``AMCA'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of 
business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature 
and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Air Movement 
and Control Association International, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL. The 
nature and scope of AMCA's standards development activities are: 
Methods of testing for fans, air louvers, dampers and airflow 
measurement stations for various aspects of performance. These are: 
Fans for airflow, pressure, power and sound; louvers for pressure drop 
and water penetration; dampers for pressure drop and air leakage; and 
airflow measurement stations for accuracy of measurement.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-25072 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# L_2019254EN.01004201.xml

| 3.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/42

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 231/2017

of 15 December 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1639]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1462 of 10 August 2017 on recognition of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1462 of 10 August 2017 on recognition of the ‘REDcert’ voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Commission Implementing Decision 2012/432/EU (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, expired on 15 August 2017 and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Commission Implementing Decision 2012/432/EU (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, expired on 15 August 2017 and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 6aj (Commission Implementing Decision 2012/432/EU) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement is replaced by the following:

‘
  32017 D 1462: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1462 of 10 August 2017 on recognition of the “REDcert” voluntary scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 208, 11.8.2017, p. 51).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1462 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 16 December 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 208, 11.8.2017, p. 51.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 199, 26.7.2012, p. 24.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET JULY 9-11 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting July 9-11 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, 

the proposal to increase Millstone Unit 3 reactor’s power by seven percent; selected sections of 

the Safety Evaluation Report on the Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor design 

certification application; rules and guidance in the area of safeguards and security; and the status 

of the 2008 seismic research program plan, including the status of resolution of Generic Safety 

Issue-199: Implications of Seismic Hazard for Nuclear Power Plants in Central and Eastern 

United States (GSI-199). 

 The ACRS advises the Commission, independently from the NRC staff, on licensing and 

operation of nuclear power plants and related safety issues. 

 The meeting will be held in Conference Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint 

North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. Wednesday and Thursday’s sessions will run from 

8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m., and Friday’s session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. A complete 

agenda is available on the NRC’s public website at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2008. 

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting 

should contact Dr. Antonio Dias, at (301) 415-6805. To pursue video conferencing services, 

contact Theron Brown, at (301) 415-8066. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-118 June 24, 2008
exv10w67



 





Exhibit 10.67




AMENDMENT

TO

EXCHANGE RIGHTS AGREEMENT

(CLASS A REALTY PARTNERSHIP UNITS)




          Second Amendment, dated as of December 17, 2003 (this “Amendment”), to
Exchange Rights Agreement dated as of January 2, 1998, among Starwood Hotels &
Resorts (the “Trust”), SLT Realty Limited Partnership (the “Realty
Partnership”) and certain limited partners of the Realty Partnership (the
“Agreement”). All capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned thereto in the
Agreement.



          WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Trust has determined that it is
advisable and in the best interests of the Trust and its shareholders to
exercise the Trust’s right pursuant to Section 2(c) of the Agreement to modify
the right to exchange Class A RP Units pursuant to the Agreement, and the
amendment thereto, dated October 10, 2002, as set forth in this Amendment to
extend the period of time during which the holders of Class A RP Units can
exchange such units for Class B EPS.



          NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust agrees, for its benefit and the benefit of the
holders of Class A RP Units, as follows:




	 	1.	 	Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 2(a) of the
Agreement or in the form of Letter of Transmittal attached thereto as
Exhibit A to the contrary, a holder of Class A RP Units may make a
Class B EPS Request in a Letter of Transmittal delivered to the Trust
after the Cross-Over Date and on or prior to January 2, 2005.
	 
	 	2.	 	Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and
shall be unmodified by the effectiveness of this Amendment.





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Starwood Hotels & Resorts has adopted this
Amendment as of the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Kenneth S. Siegel
	

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Vice President and General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2028 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2028

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to the jurisdiction 
 of Federal courts over certain cases and controversies involving the 
                         Pledge of Allegiance.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2028

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to the jurisdiction 
 of Federal courts over certain cases and controversies involving the 
                         Pledge of Allegiance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pledge Protection Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction
    ``No court created by Act of Congress shall have any jurisdiction, 
and the Supreme Court shall have no appellate jurisdiction, to hear or 
decide any question pertaining to the interpretation of, or the 
validity under the Constitution of, the Pledge of Allegiance, as 
defined in section 4 of title 4, or its recitation.''. The limitation 
in this section shall not apply to the Superior Court of the District 
of Columbia or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 99 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. (the “Company’) for the quarter ended March 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the ‘Report”), the undersigned in the capacity and on the date indicated below hereby certifies, pursuant to IS U.S.C. Section *1350,*as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (I) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   | /s/ Laura V. Stack      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Laura V. Stack          |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

May 14, 2008
Order entered January 7, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01473-CV

PATRICK CRAWFORD, Appellant

V.

CITIMORTGAGE INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-02213

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s January 2, 2013 motion to extend amended appeal 

brief deadline. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellant to file her amended 

brief within five days of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
B.C.D. 01-40

APR 3 0 2001

Employer Status Determination

Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, B.A. No. 2846

Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, L.L.C. Preassigned B.A. No. 2884

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the

continuing status of Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company (Old H&E) B.A. No. 2846, 

as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seep) (RRA)

and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seep) (RUIA)

and the status of Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, L.L.C. (New H&E)

preassigned B.A. No. 2884, as a new employer under the RRA and RUIA. Old H&E

was ruled to be an employer under the Acts effective May 15, 1959. New H&E has

not heretofore been determined to be an employer under the Acts.

On November 8, 2000, Old H&E merged with and into New H&E. Old H&E was an

Oklahoma Corporation and New H&E is a Delaware Corporation. On November 9,

2000, New H&E changed its status as a legal entity from a corporation to a limited

liability company under the laws of Delaware. A Certificate of Exemption for this

transaction was granted in Surface Transportation Board Finance Docket No.

33954, decided November 13, 2000. There has been no change in actual railroad

operations. Attorney Edward A. Razim, III, on behalf of New H&E, stated in his

letter ofJanuary 24, 2001, that the railroad’s primary business was and continues

to be the transport of wallboard and other products from Republic Gypsum’s

Facility in Duke, Oklahoma to the Wichita Tillman Jackson County rail line. He

also stated that New H&E performs the same operations as old H&E.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Surface

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV of Title 49 [45 U.S.C. §

23 l(a)(l)(i)].

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition as does 

section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

In view of the foregoing, it is determined that Hollis and Eastern Railroad

Company (an Oklahoma Corporation) ceased to be an employer under the

RRA and RUIA as of the close of business on November 8, 2000 when, it

merged with and into Hollis and Eastern Railroad Company, L.L.C. (a

BA# 2846
-2-

Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, B.A. No. 2846

Hollis & Eastern Railroad Company, L.L.C. Preassigned B.A. No. 2884

Delaware corporation). It is also determined that Hollis and Eastern Railway

Company, LLC., (a Delaware limited liability company) became an employer

under the RRA and RUIA on November 9, 2000, the date it began actual

operations as a new legal entity.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

fl/C'0 -4- ----

erome F. Kever
#### § 847.803 When do employees make the election to use their NAFI service to qualify for an immediate retirement under CSRS or FERS?

Employees about to retire must make their election to credit NAFI service under this subpart no later than the date of separation on which their retirement is based.
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Gabi Seligsohn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 30, 2011




/s/Gabi Seligsohn
Gabi Seligsohn

President and Chief Executive Officer
NRC PUBLIC MEETING NOV. 18 IN ST. FRANCISVILLE, LA., TO DISCUSS 

REVIEW PROCESS FOR NEW REACTOR APPLICATION 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting in St. Francisville, 

La., on Tuesday, Nov. 18, to discuss how the agency will review a Combined License (COL) 

application for a new reactor at the River Bend site, about 24 miles northwest of Baton Rouge, 

La. 

The applicant, Entergy, is seeking a license to build and operate an Economic Simplified 

Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) at River Bend. The application, minus proprietary or securityrelated details, is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newreactors/col/river-bend.html. 

 NRC staff will hold the meeting in the Auditorium of the W. Feliciana Parish High 

School, 8604 US Highway 61 in St. Francisville, from 7 p.m. until 9:30 p.m. NRC staff 

presentations will describe the overall Combined License review process, which includes safety 

and environmental assessments, as well as how the public can participate in the process. The 

NRC will host an open house for an hour prior to the meeting so members of the public have the 

opportunity to talk informally with agency staff. 

 A COL, if issued, provides authorization from the NRC to construct and, with conditions, 

operate a nuclear power plant at a specific site and in accordance with laws and regulations. 

More information on the NRC’s new reactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Web 

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

The NRC is currently reviewing the ESBWR, a 1,500 MWe natural-circulation boiling 

water reactor incorporating passive safety systems, for possible certification. Information on the 

design is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/designcert/esbwr.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-199
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         December 28, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 20, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Parcel Return Service Contract 11 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2019-62, CP2019-67.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-28158 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Silvio DE VITA, appellant, v. Lloyd W. McCORKLE, Principal Keeper of the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton, New Jersey.

No. 11399.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Aug. 18, 1954.

Decided Aug. 18, 1954.

Isadore Glauberman, Jersey City, N. J., for appellant.

Maurice J. McKeown, Newark, N. J., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

De Vita, found guilty of murder in connection with an armed robbery in New Jersey, petitioned the court below for a writ of *habeas corpus*alleging that he had been denied due process of law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, by the State Tribunals. Specifically he alleges that one of the jurors who sat in this case was not an impartial or indifferent person as required by law. He is under sentence of death, to be executed in the week commencing August 15th, 1954.

The court below by Judge Modarelli denied the relief sought by De Vita but nonetheless granted a certificate of probable cause for appeal pursuant to Section 2253, 28 U.S.C., and entered an order staying De Vita’s execution until noon Thursday, August 19, 1954. De Vita has appealed and has petitioned this court for the stay of his execution pending the disposition of the appeal. We shall grant the stay. It obviously would be a mockery of federal justice to execute De Vita pending the disposition of his appeal in view of the fact that Judge Mo-darelli, after denying the petition for *habeas*corpus, granted a certificate of probable cause for appeal. See Fouquette v. Bernard, 9 Cir., 1952, 198 F.2d 96. In so acting we are not unaware of the delicate balance that exists and must continue to exist between the State and federal tribunals in matters of this nature. But under the circumstances presented we have no other alternative.

Accordingly, a stay of execution will be granted pending the disposition of the appeal in the instant case.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Manchester Inc. (the Company) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the

Company.



Date: April 14, 2005





/s/ Paul Minichiello

------------------------------------

Paul Minichiello

Principal Financial Officer