alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gerald Lau and Sean Webster, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Biopack Environmental
      Solutions Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                 

Dated: April 15, 2011

| | /s/
      Gerald Lau                                       
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Gerald Lau, President and Chief Executive
      Officer    
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                              
| |                                                            
| |                                                            
| | /s/
      Sean Webster                                     
| | Sean Webster                                               
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   

---
NINE MILE POINT APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTOR 

AVAILABLE ON NRC WEB SITE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has made available to the public the combined 

license (COL) application for a new reactor at the Nine Mile Point site near Oswego, N.Y. 

The applicant, UniStar, submitted the application and associated information Sept. 30. 

The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC Web site 

at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/nine-mile-point.html. 

The UniStar application seeks approval to build and operate an Evolutionary Power 

Reactor (EPR) at the site, approximately six miles northeast of Oswego. The EPR is an Arevadesigned pressurized water reactor, with a nominal output of approximately 1,600 megawatts of 

electricity. Areva filed its application to certify the design on Dec. 11, 2007. A version of the 

EPR is currently under construction at the Olkiluoto site in Finland and at Flamanville, France. 

The EPR application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC Web 

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert/epr.html. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial check of the UniStar application to 

determine whether it contains sufficient information required for a formal review. If the 

application passes the initial check, the NRC will docket the application for review; the staff 

expects to make this decision by early December. If the staff accepts the application, the NRC 

will then announce an opportunity for the public to participate in an adjudicatory hearing on the 

application. 

Information about the new reactor licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-193 October 21, 2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 8, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00280

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J .A.O., A CHILD

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013EM503255 Honorable Eric Rodriguez , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to modify judgment is denied. This appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal because appell ant qualifies as indigent

under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

It is so ORDERED on August 8, 2018

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of August, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
#### § 531.501 Applicability.

This subpart contains regulations of the Office of Personnel Management to carry out section 5336 of title 5, United States Code, which authorizes the head of an agency, or another official to whom such authority is delegated, to grant quality step increases.

[60 FR 43948, Aug. 23, 1995]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Page 31 - *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52

*Commercial/financial information may be entitled to confidential treatment* 
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
Page 75 - *Confidential Statement of Formula may be entitled to confidential treatment*
#### Matilda Sussman, Appellant, v. Aaron Hershfield, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Germaine Guntzer, Respondent, v. County of Westchester, Appellant.

In an action against the county of Westchester to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, order of the County Court, Westchester County, granting plaintiff’s motion to extend her time to serve a complaint and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 16, 17, 218; *Liberty Bank of Buffalo*v. *City of Buffalo,*241 App. Div. 323, 324; *Friederiehsen*v. *Benard,*247 IT. S. 207.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., -dissent and vote to reverse the order, to deny plaintiff’s motion and to grant defendant’s cross motion on the authority of *Harriss*v. *Tams*(258 N. Y. 229) and *Liberty Bank of Buffalo*v. *City of Buffalo*(241 App. Div. 323). [See *post*pp. 966, 1008.]
Exhibit
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofAllied
 Resources, Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedSeptember 30,
 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission on the date hereof, I,Ruairidh Campbell, do
 hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
 best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of
the registrant for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November
 13, 2009





/s/
 Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh
 Campbell

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A
 signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the
 registrant and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

11
Exhibit 32.1**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**     I, Eli Porat, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Tvia, Inc. (the “Company”), certifyfor the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to thebest of my knowledge,     (i)     the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2006(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and     (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         By       /s/ Eli Porat    Eli Porat    June 27, 2006
#### In the Matter of Samuel Siegel, an Attorney.

Present—Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
| Home   | Site   Search |Help   | CommentsSite   Contents | What's   New | Online Bookstore | Finding   Aids | Library   Services

You have reached the Federal Depository   Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures   ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the   archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locator services,   including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications. There is no direct   browsing of the archive. Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the   event that publications are no longer available from the original publishing   agency site.   
   For more information on GPO's Permanent Public Access initiatives, see the   Permanent Public Access Working Group   Web page.   

A service of the Superintendent   of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.   Questions or comments: [email protected].

 Last   updated:  October 12, 2000   Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/index.html |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Peter
Braun, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Peter Braun
-----------------------

Peter Braun
President and CEO
November 11, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronald SAMPSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50470.

D.C. No. CR-00-371-HLH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 10, 2002.

Decided May 23, 2002.

*592Before KLEINFELD and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Ronald Sampson appeals his ten-month sentence imposed for income tax evasion. He argues that the district court erred in imposing an enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 2Tl.l(b)(l) without sufficient factual findings, in ordering restitution that was not contemplated by the plea agreement, and in delegating the task of determining the amount of restitution to the Internal Revenue Service. He asks the court to reverse imposition of the enhancement and to vacate the order of restitution. We affirm in part, and vacate and remand in part.

Sampson contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Tl.l(b) for failing to report more than $10,000 in income gained as a result of criminal activity because the court based the enhancement on conduct that was only civil in nature. The district court found that the “criminal means” in this case were “the withdrawals without authorization of clients’ money from the attorney trust fund of the defendant and referred also to a “criminal taking of clients funds.” The record supports this finding, and the finding describes a crime. *See*Cal.Penal Code § 506 (West 1999).

However, we find that a limited remand is necessary in order to correct the order of restitution. The district court ordered restitution to the Internal Revenue Service for the tax due for the year of Sampson’s conviction. Although a meeting was contemplated by the plea-agreement, the parties had not met in order to arrive at this calculation. The court, therefore, acknowledged that it was unsure of the actual amount of restitution and ordered that the amount of restitution “is to be determined by the Internal Revenue Service in consultation with the defendant.”

The court should have determined the actual amount of restitution owed after Sampson’s tax liability had been calculated and entered its order accordingly. *See United States v. Najjor,*255 F.3d 979, 984 (9th Cir.2001) (the sentencing court is responsible for determining the amount of loss the victim suffered by the defendant’s conduct). We remand so that the court may now do so.

We affirm the convictions and sentence, but vacate the restitution order and remand for the limited purpose of correcting the award of restitution.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED for correction of amount of restitution ordered.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of A4S
Security, Inc., (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, each of
the undersigned Thomas Marinelli, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey
G. McGonegal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                                                                               |                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2006 
                   
                   
Date: May 15, 2006 | By: /s/ Thomas Marinelli
Thomas Marinelli
Chief Executive Officer
 By: /s/ Jeffrey G. McGonegal
      Chief Financial Officer

*   *   *   *   *

A signed original of the written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Zeese-Wilkinson-Dillon Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Brownie’s Blockprints, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the affirmative defense of defendant Brownie’s Blockprints, Inc., affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 65198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-25002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Public Health Service Act; Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the authority vested 
in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under Section 319F-2 of 
Title III of the Public Health Service Act, as amended, to enter into 
agreements with recipients of the Stockpile material will be deployed. 
The authority to deploy the Stockpile referred to herein is limited to 
the CHEMPACK Program.
    This authority cannot be redelegated. Further, CDC must notify the 
Office of Public Health Emergency Preparedness before entering into an 
agreement.
    This delegation became effective upon date of signature. In 
addition, I have affirmed and ratified any actions taken by the 
Director, CDC, or his/her subordinates which involved the exercise of 
the authorities delegated therein prior to the effective date of the 
delegation.

    Dated: October 27, 2004.
Tommy G. Thompson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-25002 Filed 11-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of American Bank Holdings,Inc. (The “Company”), Hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the datehereof:

 

(a)          The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of theCompany for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(b)         Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/Phillip C. Bowman                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Phillip C. Bowman                     |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | May 14, 2004                          |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to American Bank Holdings, Inc. and will beretained by American Bank Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-1188 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2008-SW-46-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### Mrs. W. F. ROBINSON, movant, v. David A. JOHNSON, opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

December 5, 1947.

Hubert Meredith for movant.

Claude E. Smith for opposed.

Motion for an appeal from the Daviess Circuit Court. Money judgment for $446 as damages for violation of Regulation 139 promulgated by the Office of Price Administration.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; Judgment affirmed.
### **CHAPTER 10—ANCHORAGE GROUNDS AND HARBOR REGULATIONS GENERALLY**

Sec.
471, 472.
Transferred.
473, 474.
Repealed.
475.
Regulations for Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.
476.
Restrictions on tanker traffic in Puget Sound and adjacent waters.
#### § 838.801 Purpose and scope.

This subpart regulates the requirements that a court order awarding a former spouse survivor annuity must meet to be a court order acceptable for processing.