alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gregory D. Casciaro, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of XTENT, Inc. onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of XTENT, Inc.
| Date: November 2, 2007 |
|-----------------------------|
|                        |
| By:                         | /s/ Gregory D. Casciaro |
|                        | Gregory D. Casciaro |
|                        | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                        | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

----
§ 752.101 Coverage. ( a ) *Adverse actions covered.* This subpart applies to actions taken under 5 U.S.C. 7515. *(b) Definitions. In this subpart—* Agency— ( 1 ) Has the meaning given the term in 5 U.S.C. 2302(a)(2)(C), without regard to whether any other provision of this chapter is applicable to the entity; and
( 2 ) Does not include any entity that is an element of the intelligence community, as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). *Day* means a calendar day.
*Grade* means a level of classification under a position classification system.
*Insufficient evidence* means evidence that fails to meet the substantial evidence standard described in 5 CFR 1201.4(p).
*Pay* means the rate of basic pay fixed by law or administrative action for the position held by the employee, that is, the rate of pay before any deductions and exclusive of additional pay of any kind.
*Prohibited personnel action* means taking or failing to take an action in violation of paragraph (8), (9), or (14) of 5 U.S.C. 2302(b) against an employee of an agency.
*Supervisor* means an employee who would be a supervisor, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 7103(a)(10), if the entity employing the employee was an agency.
*Suspension* means the placing of an employee, for disciplinary reasons, in a temporary status without duties and pay.
[85 FR 65983, Oct. 16, 2020, as amended 87 FR 67782, Nov. 10, 2022]
NRC, ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS UPDATE 

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COOPERATION 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Army Corps of Engineers have revised 

their interagency agreement regarding environmental reviews for proposed nuclear power plants 

as well as significant actions at existing plants. The agencies will coordinate early in these 

reviews to ensure they share all the information necessary for carrying out their respective 

regulatory duties. 

The NRC’s licensing process ensures public health and safety, as well as the 

environment, are maintained during commercial use of nuclear materials, including nuclear 

power plants. The NRC takes the lead in meeting the National Environmental Policy Act’s 

(NEPA) requirements during that process. The Corps protects U.S. waters and wetlands through 

the provisions of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and the Clean Water Act, and administers 

permits for such purposes. 

 

“We’re now in a better position to work efficiently with the Corps as we come to our 

decisions on more than a dozen new reactor applications,” said Bill Borchardt, the NRC’s 

Executive Director for Operations. “The technical expertise both agencies bring to bear on these 

reviews means the public can be confident we’ll reach accurate conclusions regarding these 

projects’ potential environmental impacts.” 

“I’m pleased that this interagency agreement will improve the energy regulatory process 

and carry out the President’s directives to facilitate America’s energy independence while 

assuring the highest standards for environmental quality,” said John Paul Woodley, Jr., Army 

Assistant Secretary for Civil Works. 

Borchardt and Woodley signed the agreement, which lays out the two agencies’ separate 

roles and agrees that the NRC’s and the Corps’ licensing and permit processes will start 

essentially simultaneously. The agreement names the NRC as the lead NEPA agency for 

preparing an environmental analysis on a proposed nuclear power plant. In this role, the NRC 

will strive to coordinate early with the Corps to address Clean Water Act permitting 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-177 September 22, 2008
requirements. The Corps will complete an independent permit decision in carrying out its 

regulatory responsibilities. The agreement includes a process for resolving any instances where 

the two agencies disagree on a proposed plant’s compliance with the agencies’ respective rules. 

 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
B.C.D. 02-30 APR 15 2002

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Conecuh Valley Railroad Co., Inc.

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

Conecuh Valley Railroad Co., Inc. (CVRC) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seg.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seg.) (RUIA). CVRC has not heretofore been

ruled to be an employer under the RRA and RUIA.

According to Mr. H. Peter Claussen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of

Gulf and Ohio Railways, a non-carrier holding company, which wholly owns

CVRC, CVRC began operations as a common carrier on October 8, 2001 on a rail

line it acquired from the Southern Alabama Railroad Co., Inc.. CVRC operates on

approximately 15.04 miles ofrail line between Troy, Alabama and Goshen,

Alabama, interchanging with CSX, a covered employer, at Troy, Alabama. CVRC 

first compensated employees on October 15, 2001. Surface Transportation Board

authority for the acquisition and operation ofits carrier service is set forth in STB

Finance Docket numbers 34105 and 34106, decided November 7, 2001.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

is relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe

Surface Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV of Title 49 

[45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(l)(i)].

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition as does

section 3231 ofthe Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

BA# 5585
-2-

Conecuh Valley Railroad, Co., Inc.

Based on the information summarized above, it is determined that Conecuh

Valley Railroad Co., Inc. became an employer covered under the Railroad

Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act on October

8, 2001, the date it began operations.

Cherryl Tu'Thomas

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

X?.

erome F. Kever

.< A ./H'i
# L_2014283EN.01000101.xml

| 27.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity

The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (1) adopted on 29 October 2010 will enter into force, by virtue of Article 33(1) of the Protocol, on 12 October 2014.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 150, 20.5.2014, p. 234.

1

---
### **CHAPTERS 1601 THROUGH 1699—RESERVED**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(b)(14), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2838, added placeholder for chapters 1601 to 1699.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2132

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to reallocate costs of the Pactola 

Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to reflect increased demands for 

municipal and industrial and fish and wildlife purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2003

Mr. JANKLOW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to reallocate costs 

of the Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to 

reflect increased demands for municipal and industrial 

and fish and wildlife purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pactola Reservoir Re5 allocation Authorization Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 
2

•HR 2132 IH 

1 (1) It is appropriate to reallocate the costs of 

2 the Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to 

3 reflect increased demands for municipal and indus4 trial and fish and wildlife purposes. 

5 (2) Section 302 of the Department of Energy 

6 Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7152) prohibits this re7 allocation of costs without congressional approval. 

8 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF REALLOCATION OF COSTS OF 

9 PACTOLA DAM AND RESERVOIR, SOUTH DA10 KOTA. 

11 The Secretary of the Interior may reallocate the con12 struction costs of the Pactola Dam and Reservoir, Rapid 

13 Valley Unit, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, South 

14 Dakota, from irrigation purposes to municipal and indus15 trial and fish and wildlife purposes. The reallocation shall 

16 be accomplished in a manner consistent with reclamation 

17 law (including the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), 

18 and all Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary there19 to) and Bureau of Reclamation policy.

Æ
#### Frances Guercio et al., Appellants, v. New York Lerner Company, Inc., Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 782.]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     I, C. Shane Polson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Technol Fuel
     Conditioners, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.


         By: /s/ C. Shane Polson                              Date: May 23, 2006
             -------------------
             C. Shane Polson
             President and Chief executive Officer
### §313. Appointments and enlistments: age limitations

(a) To be eligible for original enlistment in the National Guard, a person must be at least 17 years of age and under 45, or under 64 years of age and a former member of the Regular Army, Regular Navy, Regular Air Force, or Regular Marine Corps. To be eligible for reenlistment, a person must be under 64 years of age.

(b) To be eligible for appointment as an officer of the National Guard, a person must—

(1) be a citizen of the United States; and

(2) be at least 18 years of age and under 64.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 604; Pub. L. 85–861, §2(9), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1544; Pub. L. 90–130, §2(2), Nov. 8, 1967, 81 Stat. 383.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 313(a) 313(b) | 32:4 (less 22 words before proviso).32:4 (22 words before proviso). | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §58; restated Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 371, §1 (1st par.); restated June 15, 1933, ch. 87, §5 (1st par.), 48 Stat. 155; June 19, 1935, ch. 277, §2, 49 Stat. 391; June 28, 1947, ch. 162, §7 (less applicability to §57 of the Act of June 3, 1916, ch. 134), 61 Stat. 192; July 9, 1952, ch. 608, §§803 (8th par.), 806(j), 66 Stat. 505, 508. |

313(b)

32:4 (22 words before proviso).

In subsection (a), 32:4 (1st 19 words) is omitted as covered by section 101(3) and (5) of this title. 32:4 (54th through 62d words) is omitted as surplusage. The words "under 64" are substituted for the words "not more than sixty-four" to conform to an opinion of the Judge Advocate General of the Army (JAGA 1953/9033, 3 Dec. 1953). The word "Regular" is inserted before the words "Navy" and "Marine Corps". The words "Regular Air Force" are inserted to complete the coverage of the revised section. The word "reenlistment" is substituted for the words "subsequent enlistment".

| Section of title 32 | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 313(b) | 32 App.:4 (as applicable to age). | July 30, 1956, ch. 789, §2 (as applicable to age), 70 Stat. 729. |

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1967—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 90–130 struck out cl. (3) which inserted requirement that women appointed with a view to serving as a nurse or medical specialist be at least 21 years of age and under 64 years of age in order to be eligible for appointment as an officer of the National Guard.

1958—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 85–861 inserted qualifications for appointment of women with a view to serving as nurses or medical specialists.
#### § 575.213 Records and reports.

Each agency must keep a record of each determination to pay a relocation incentive and make such records available for review upon OPM's request.

[70 FR 25743, May 13, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 49364, Aug. 14, 2013]
#### Kenmore Estates, Inc., Appellant, v. Montrose Industrial Bank, Respondent.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARJINDER SINGH, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 11-70612 Agency No. A089-697-548
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted October 6, 2014 San Francisco, California Before: WARDLAW, W. FLETCHER, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Harjinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for cance llation of removal, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Tort ure. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition and remand to the BIA. 

# FILED
OCT 17 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Because the BIA’s analysis suggests that it conducted an independent review of the record, we review the BIA’s decision. Ahmed v. Keisler , 504 F.3d 1183, 1190 (9th Cir. 2007). Despite the IJ’s a dverse credibility finding, the BIA assumed credibility for the purpose of its decision. We therefore assume that Singh’s factual contentions are true. Navas v. INS , 217 F.3d 646, 657 (9th Cir. 2000). Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that Singh failed to establish a nexus between his past mistreatment and his political opinion. Singh testified that he was arrested, beaten, a nd threatened because he filed a complaint against the police alleging that the police ha d a hand in his father’s death. During his arrest, Singh was questioned about politics and ridiculed for his political affiliation with the Shiromani Akali Dal party. Police officers threatened to kill Singh if he did not retract his complain t. Singh’s testimony establishes a nexus between his mistreatment and his real or imputed political opinion. See Grava v. INS , 205 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2000); Navas , 217 F.3d at 658–59. Additionally, substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that Singh failed to establish a nexus between his past mistreatment and a protected social group. Singh testified that his fath er was an active member of the Shiromani Akali Dal party and that the police wanted to stop his father’s activities. Singh was arrested and questioned regarding his fa ther’s whereabouts; Singh was threatened
2and beaten during his arrest. Singh was only released when his father was arrested. Police continued to visit Singh’s home to threaten his father. This testimony establishes a nexus between Singh’s mistreatment and a particular social group: Singh’s family. See Jie Lin v. Ashcroft , 377 F.3d 1014, 1028–29 (9th Cir. 2004). Therefore, we grant Singh’s petition for review and remand for the BIA to consider issues other than nexus to an enumerated ground in the first instance. INS v. Orlando Ventura , 537 U.S. 12 (2002). Petition GRANTED and REMANDED.

3
# L_2016211EN.01002801.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 91/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1274]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/292 of 24 February 2015 approving carbon dioxide as an active substance for use in biocidal products for product-type 15 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/292 of 24 February 2015 approving carbon dioxide as an active substance for use in biocidal products for product-type 15 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzq (Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzr. | 32015 R 0292: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/292 of 24 February 2015 approving carbon dioxide as an active substance for use in biocidal products for product-type 15 (OJ L 53, 25.2.2015, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzr.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/292 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 53, 25.2.2015, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Achim Stamm, Chief Financial Officer of Aqua Society, Inc.
  (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
  to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                              

| | By:    | /s/
      Achim Stamm  
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | ACHIM STAMM            
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 20, 2006         

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
```

[107th Congress Public Law 35]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ035.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 217]]

Public Law 107-35
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
419 Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, as the ``M. Caldwell 
 Butler Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 20, 2001 -  [H.R. 1753]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 419 
Rutherford Avenue, N.E., in Roanoke, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``M. Caldwell Butler Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``M. Caldwell Butler Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved August 20, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1753:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            June 20, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.
```