alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000066

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2006-WMC2,

ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-WMC2,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v.

DONNA MAE AMINA, AKA DONNA M. AMINA;

MELVIN KEAKAKU AMINA, AKA MELVIN K. AMINA,

Defendants/Counterclaimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF 2304 METCALF STREET,

Defendants-Appellees, and NATIONWIDE TITLE CLEARING, INC.;

ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP, Third-Party Defendants-Appellees, and

DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC181000540)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Wadsworth, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that selfrepresented Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs/CounterclaimantsAppellants Melvin Keakaku Amina, AKA Melvin K. Amina, and Donna

Mae Amina, AKA Donna M. Amina (Amina Parties) appeal from the

Circuit Court of the First Circuit's May 20, 2022 "Order Denying

[Amina Parties']: (1) Second Motion for More Time to Respond to

Aldridge Pite's Motion for Summary Judgment, Filed April 22,

2022, and (2) Motion to Continue Hearing on Aldridge Pite's

Motion for Summary Judgment" (5/20/22 Order), and its July 11,

2022 "Amended Final Judgment Regarding Order Granting:

(1) Third-Party Defendant Aldridge Pite, LLP's Motion for Summary

Judgment on [Amina Parties'] Third-Party Complaint Filed May 21,

2019, Filed Herein on January 25, 2022 ('AP's MSJ'); and

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000066

23-FEB-2023

07:52 AM

Dkt. 7 ODSLJ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(2) Third-Party Defendant Nationwide Title Clearing, LLC, F/K/A

Nationwide Title Clearing, Inc.'s Substantive Joinder to AP's

MSJ, Filed February 17, 2022" (7/11/22 Amended Judgment). 

Assuming, arguendo, that an appeal from the 7/11/22

Amended Judgment would bring up for review the 5/20/22 Order, the

Amina Parties nonetheless failed to file the December 9, 2022

Notice of Appeal within thirty days after entry of the 7/11/22

Amended Judgment, as required by Hawai i Rules of Appellate

Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(1). See HRAP Rule 26(e) ("The

reviewing court for good cause shown may relieve a party from a

default occasioned by any failure to comply with these rules,

except the failure to give timely notice of appeal."); Narmore v.

Kawafuchi, 112 Hawai i 69, 81, 143 P.3d 1271, 1283 (2006) ("The

requirement that a party timely file a notice of appeal has been

held to be jurisdictional by this court."). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, February 23, 2023.

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge 

2
Exhibit 32.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

                   Certification of Chief Executive Officer
          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard David Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods presented in this Report.



By: /s/ Richard David Scott
Richard David Scott
Chief Financial Officer


Date: December 7, 2007
<page>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 61 Forsyth Street, SW

 Atlanta, GA, 30303-8931

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. II-04-007 March 11, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO HOLD OPEN REGULATORY CONFERENCE 

 TO DISCUSS BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR PLANT OPERATIONS 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold an open Regulatory Conference with officials

of Progress Energy on March 17 in Atlanta to discuss operations at the company’s Brunswick nuclear

power plant.

 Conferees will discuss the safety significance of a Brunswick Unit 2 design review that did not

recognize that the reactor feedwater pump speed control system’s power supplies would fail to provide

power during power supply voltage transients. Progress Energy officials requested the conference to

discuss their evaluation of the review’s preliminary findings.

 The meeting is open to public observation and will begin at 1:00 p.m. in the NRC’s Region II

office in Atlanta, located in the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Suite 24T20.

 The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a color coded

process which classifies regulatory findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of

safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that the safety significance of this

issue is white, meaning that it is considered to be of low to moderate safety significance.

 No decision on determination of the final significance, any apparent violation or any contemplated

enforcement action will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC

officials at a later time.

###
Contains Confidential Business Information

Note: The PMN substance, CAS 12005

‐ 25

‐ 3, is a component in a CSA product mixture at approximately

30% concentration. It is not imported or handled in its pure state. All physico

‐ chemical measurements

or estimates were based on the CSA product mixture, and not on the pure PMN substance.

Property Value Measured

or

Estimated CBI if

marked

with an X

Physical state Solid Measured X

Vapor Pressure Not applicable Estimated X

Density 2.95 g/cm 3 Measured X

Solubility Slightly water soluble

‐ hydrates to form ettringite Measured X

Melting Temperature >450  C Estimated X

Boiling/Sublimation

Temperature >450  C Estimated X

Dissociation Constant Not applicable Estimated X

Octanol/water partition

coefficient Not applicable Estimated X

Henry’s Law Constant Not applicable Estimated X

Volatilization from

water Not applicable Estimated X

Volatilization from soil Not applicable Estimated X

pH (in water) 11

‐ 13 Measured X

Flammability Non

‐ flammable Estimated X

Explodability Non

‐ explosive Estimated X

Particle Size

Distribution See separate attachment for details;

Approximately 1

‐ 200  m diameter;

medium diameter approximately 14  m Measured X
### §891h. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for carrying out this subchapter—

(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 1993;

(2) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 1994; and

(3) such sums as are necessary for each of the fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997.

#### (b) Limitation on fleet modernization activities

All National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration fleet modernization shipbuilding, and conversion shall be conducted in accordance with this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title VI, §610, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4303.)
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 208 / Thursday, October 28, 2004 / Presidential Documents 63039

Memorandum of October 21, 2004

Delegation of Certain Functions Related to the Sudan Peace 

Act 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United 

States Code, I hereby delegate to you the determination, certification, and 

reporting functions conferred upon the President by sections 6(b)(1) and 

6(c) of the Sudan Peace Act (Public Law 107–245). 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

[FR Doc. 04–24302

Filed 10–27–04; 9:31 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 21, 2004. 

.

W
Exhibit 4




Exhibit 4 (0)


March 1, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



  	
      Subject:  
	
      General Electric Capital Services, Inc. Annual Report on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 -- File No. 0-14804






Dear Sirs:

Neither General Electric Capital Services, Inc. (the
"Corporation") nor any of its subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with
respect to its long-term debt that is not registered or filed with the
Commission and under which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10%
of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis. In accordance with paragraph (b) (4) (iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K
(17 CFR §229.601), the Corporation hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities
and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument which defines
the rights of holders of such long-term debt.

 



  	
      
      Very truly yours,

      GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL SERVICES, INC.

       

	
      
      By: 
	
      
      /s/ James A. Parke

	 	
      
 

      
	 	
      
      James A. Parke

      Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
No. I-08-052 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331 

Sept. 16, 2008

NRC PROPOSES $6,500 FINE FOR BUFFALO, N.Y., FIRM FOR FAILURE 

TO ADHERE TO REQUIREMENTS FOR USE OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is proposing a $6,500 civil penalty for Quality 

Inspection Services, Inc., (QISI) of Buffalo, N.Y., for a violation of NRC requirements involving 

the use of an industrial radiography facility it owns in Manchester, Conn. 

Specifically, the NRC found there was a willful failure on the part of a QISI site 

Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) to maintain utilization logs for each sealed radioactive source at 

the site. NRC reviews determined that the RSO performed radiographic operations at the 

Manchester site on several occasions between Nov. 15, 2006, and March 2, 2007, without 

keeping such logs. Among other things, these logs capture whether safety procedures were 

followed. 

During industrial radiography operations, metal parts and welds can be inspected for 

flaws. A sealed radioactive source beams radiation at the object to be checked. Special 

photographic, or radiographic, film on the opposite side of the source is exposed when it is struck 

by the radiation passing through. Structural problems can be detected by studying the film. 

“The NRC concluded that the RSO’s actions were willful, in careless disregard of NRC 

requirements,” NRC Region I Samuel J. Collins wrote to QISI regarding the enforcement action. 

“Willful violations are of particular concern to the NRC, because its regulatory program is based 

on licensees and their employees acting with integrity.” 

On March 13 and 14, 2007, the NRC conducted an inspection at the Manchester site to 

evaluate final preparation of a permanent radiographic facility there. The inspection was 

performed in anticipation of a request from the company for NRC approval of the facility. 

During the inspection, the NRC learned that radiographic exposures were conducted at the site 

prior to NRC approval and were not carried out in accordance with agency regulations. 

An investigation by the NRC Office of Investigations was subsequently conducted to 

determine whether unauthorized radiography operations had been performed at the site and 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
whether QISI personnel had provided incomplete and inaccurate information to the NRC on 

March 13, 2007. Based on information gathered during the investigation and the earlier 

inspection, the NRC identified the violation for which the fine is being proposed. The violation 

was discussed with QISI during a predecisional enforcement conference in the NRC Region I 

Office on Aug. 27, 2008. At that meeting, QISI discussed, among other things, corrective actions 

it had taken in response to the apparent violations. 

QISI has 30 days to provide the NRC with a written response to the violation. 

 #
### §20904. Membership

Except as provided in this chapter, eligibility for membership in the corporation and the rights and privileges of members are as provided in the bylaws.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1291.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20904 | 36:2105. | Aug. 10, 1982, Pub. L. 97–234, §5, 96 Stat. 262. |

Section
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39

N'T''',S'SIG

INITI~I,',10 

### . m OlITlS(;SH'OOl SffiAI.$SIG Mn
""~ SV>UIOL J<lTlAU'SKl o"n~ result inloss ofthe airbrake, which inturn can lead to reduced controllability ofthe these products. originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl defcribe, the unsafe condition as: Extension ofairbrakes above 360 KlAS [knots indicated air speed]/O.79 Mi [Mach indicated] results 

## inaerodynamic driven vibration 

## , ofthe airbrake which, ifnot limited per Revision 14to the AfM (airplane 

## , flight manual], can lead to high cycle fatigue failure ofthe airbrake in-board hinge. airplane. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation RlN 2120-AA64

ACTION: Final rule. (DOT).

The unsafe condition ishigh cycle fatigue ofthe airbrake in-board hinge, which can SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products liste ~ /0 'U "OUTl ••••• SV. l 

### 100 

## T'¥Ho [Docket No. FAA-2010-0555; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-053-AO; Amendment oVT.:snt""l 

## 101.\-,?4J 7.U-I)"t 

# -7 39-*****; AD 2010-'**-**] 

# cu.- 0,"'1; 

## %/3,//. Ainvorthincss Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Type Certificate Previously Held R0l11'ING5\"M''Y" 

### I .. I l'"t by Israel Aircraft Industries, Ltd.) Model 

### Galaxy and Gulfstream 200 Airplanes
#### 500 Fifth Avenue, Inc., Respondent, v. Morris D. Dalsheim, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to modify the judgment by reducing the same to $2,100.60 on the ground that the percentage rent fixed in the lease in effect June 1, 1944, measures the tenant’s liability.
#### In the Matter of Clarence E. Southard et al., Respondents, against John E. McGann et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Island Park, Nassau County, et al., Appellants.

In our opinion the court is without power to cancel the election of candidates for one office in an election in which voting machines were used and in which election candidates for other officers were upon the ballots on the voting machines and voted for in the election. *(Matter of Hogan*v. *Supreme Court,*281 N. Y. 572.) The matters alleged in the petition do not fall within any of the subdivisions of section 330 of the Election Law nor do they, if accepted as true, establish fraud warranting the summary action by the court. The order made is not within the “inherent powers of the court, but must find authorization and support in the express provisions of the statute.” *(Matter of Tamney*v. *Atkins,*209 N. Y. 202, 206; *Matter of Gabelmann,*136 Misc. 641, 642.) “ The field of its powers is limited to the specified matters; within that field the power is plenary.” *(Matter of Holley [Rittenberg],*268 N. Y. 484, 487; *Matter of Aurelio*v. *Cohen,*44 N. Y. S. 2d 145, affd. 266 App. Div. 603, affd. 291 N. Y. 645.) In a companion appeal decided herewith *(Matter of Anson*v. *McGann, ante,*p. 586) we have directed that the board of trustees of the village shall, pursuant to section 53 of the Village *589Law, determine which of the two candidates for trustee who received an equal number of votes shall be deemed elected. When that direction has been complied with, title to that office or to others held by the officials elected in the election in question may, if so advised, be tested by quo warranto upon the disputable and extraneous facts alleged in the petition. *(Greene*v. *Knox, 175*N. Y. 432; Civ. Prac. Act, art. 75.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
### §150502. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—National Conference of State Societies, Washington, District of Columbia (in this chapter, the "corporation"), is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1389.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150502 | 36:401. | Apr. 3, 1952, ch. 131, §1, 66 Stat. 37; July 5, 1968, Pub. L. 90–382, (1), 82 Stat. 292. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provision for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary and executed words.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 06-101 August 15, 2006

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OFVOGTLE EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is making available an application from Southern NuclearOperating Co. for an Early Site Permit (ESP) for property located near the Vogtle nuclear power plant,about 23 miles southeast of Augusta, Ga.  

Last May the NRC held two public meetings in Waynesboro, Ga., to discuss the permit reviewprocess.  The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmentalimpacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The NRC’sformal review will address site safety, environmental protection and emergency planning issues.  If theagency approves the request, Southern Nuclear could reference the permit at any time for up to 20years in an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction of one or more nuclearreactors at the site. 

The Vogtle Early Site Permit application will be available electronically on the NRC’s Website on this page: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/esp.html . A copy of the application willalso be available for public review at the NRC Public Document Room, located at 11555 RockvillePike, Rockville, MD; telephone:  800/397-4209 or 301/415-4737. Local residents may view theapplication at the Burke County Library, 130 Highway 24 South in Waynesboro.

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine whetherit contains enough information for the staff to perform a comprehensive technical review.  If theapplication has sufficient information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and willannounce an opportunity for affected persons to participate in the required hearing. 

###
EXHIBIT 31.2

                       QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Tsuida certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alexander
International Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this quarterly report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of the most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of November 2003.


/s/ Robert Tsuida
-------------------------
Chief Financial Officer