alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3601.105 Disclaimer for teaching, speaking, and writing in a personal capacity related to official duties. An employee who uses or permits the use of his or her military rank or who includes or permits the inclusion of his or her title or position as one of several biographical details given to identify himself or herself in connection with teaching, speaking, or writing, in accordance with 5 CFR 2635.807(b), must make a disclaimer if the subject of the teaching, speaking, or writing deals in significant part with any ongoing or announced policy, program, or operation of the employee's agency, as defined in § 3601.102, and the employee has not been authorized by appropriate agency authority to present that material as the agency's position. The disclaimer must be made as follows: ( a ) The required disclaimer must expressly state that the views presented are those of the speaker or author and do not necessarily represent the views of DoD or its components.
( b ) When a disclaimer is required for an article, book, or other writing, the disclaimer will be printed in a reasonably prominent position in the writing itself.
( c ) When a disclaimer is required for a speech or other oral presentation, the disclaimer may be given orally provided it is given at the beginning of the oral presentation. *Example 1 to § 3601.105* [Disclaimer Required]: An employee is asked to provide unpaid personal remarks at a local university on a DoD matter she handled in the past year. As part of her introduction, the university facilitator identifies the employee by her official title. Since the subject matter of her speech is related to her official duties, and her official title is used, she must provide a reasonably prominent disclaimer at the beginning of her remarks.
*Example 2 to § 3601.105* [Disclaimer Not Required]: An employee is invited in his personal capacity to speak at his alma mater on Career Day about his personal experiences as a Government employee, but will not discuss the ongoing or announced policy, program, or operation of his agency. The introduction to his talk only mentions that he is a graduate of the school and currently a “DoD employee,” but does not use his official title, rank, or position. No disclaimer would be necessary because the introduction to the employee's speech did not include his official title or position and the subject of the speech does not deal in significant part with any ongoing or announced policy, program or operation of the relevant DoD agency.
Note 1 to § 3601.105 .
Ethics review of whether a disclaimer is necessary or prudent is not a substitute for compliance with other DoD requirements such as obtaining a security review of the content of the teaching, speaking, or writing.
#### Ruthbert Real Estate Corp., Respondent, v. Edward Koorbusch, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, John McLeod, the President, Secretary,
Treasurer and a director of California Oil & Gas Corporation, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         
 the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas
Corporation for the period ended August 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)         
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of California Oil
& Gas Corporation.

Dated October 20, 2008.



/s/ John McLeod John McLeod President, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
### §190103. Membership

(a) Eligibility.—Eligibility for membership in the corporation is as provided in the constitution and bylaws of the corporation.

(b) Voting.—Each active member of a department or chapter has one vote in the conduct of official business of that department or chapter.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1447.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190103(a) | 36:225. | June 30, 1950, ch. 431, §§5, 7(e), 64 Stat. 313, 314. |
| 190103(b) | 36:227(e). | |

Section
### §142. White Cane Safety Day

The President may issue each year a proclamation—

(1) designating October 15 as White Cane Safety Day; and

(2) calling on the people of the United States to observe White Cane Safety Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1262.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 142 | 36:169d. | Oct. 6, 1964, Pub. L. 88–628, 78 Stat. 1003. |

Section
### §891f. Use of vessels

#### (a) Vessel agreements

In implementing the NOAA fleet replacement and modernization program, the Secretary shall use excess capacity of UNOLS vessels where appropriate and may enter into memoranda of agreement with the operators of these vessels to carry out this requirement.

#### (b) Report to Congress

Within one year after October 29, 1992, the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide a report to Congress, in consultation with the Secretary, comparing the cost-efficiency, accounting, and operating practices of the vessels of NOAA, UNOLS, other Federal agencies, and the United States private sector in meeting the missions of NOAA.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title VI, §608, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4303.)
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-165 September 9, 2008

NRC PERMANENTLY BARS CONTRACTOR FROM MANY 

ACTIVITIES, RESTRICTS OTHER NRC-LICENSED FUNCTIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an Order to a nuclear materials contractor 

permanently prohibiting him from any work related to packaging and transporting so-called “Type 

B” nuclear materials. The agency issued the immediately effective Order, which also places 

restrictions on other NRC-regulated activities for five years, following the contractor’s plea 

agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice. 

NRC officials said Joseph S. Shepherd, a contractor for Source Production and Equipment 

Company (SPEC), which supplies industrial gamma radiography equipment, repeatedly and 

deliberately provided inaccurate information regarding modifications to, and inspections of, a 

shipping container for radioactive material. Specifically, Shepherd told the NRC in 2005 that he had 

authorized modifications to the container, invalidating its status as an NRC-approved package. 

Shepherd repeatedly told both SPEC and the NRC the container had been properly inspected, but 

NRC investigators determined the inspections were incomplete or not performed by a qualified 

inspector. 

“The NRC can no longer rely on Mr. Shepherd complying with our rules for Type B 

packages, so we’ve barred him from working in that area,” said Cynthia Carpenter, Director of the 

NRC’s Office of Enforcement. “While no one was harmed by his actions in this case, altering the 

integrity of a shipping package for significant amounts of radioactive material was inexcusable.” 

The Order and the DOJ agreement require Shepherd, over the next five years, to take several 

actions before he can perform other NRC-regulated activities, including: 

• Notifying the NRC, in writing, before doing such work so that the agency can 

perform proper inspections; 

• Notifying his customers of the Order; and 

• Completing Radiation Safety Officer training, focusing on the importance of meeting 

NRC and U.S. Department of Transportation regulations. 

The Order will be available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/enforcement/actions/individuals/.

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-018 August 14, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR PUBLIC COMMENTS AUGUST 28

 IN GRAND GULF EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION PROCEEDING

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, an independent judicial arm of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, will receive comments from interested members of the public in

connection with the Early Site permit (ESP) application for the Grand Gulf nuclear plant.

The Board will receive comments from interested members of the public in a session on

August 28 from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Port Gibson City Hall, 1005 College St., Port Gibson,

Miss. Each speaker will be allowed approximately five minutes to make a statement to the

Board.

The Grand Gulf ESP application was filed on October 16, 2003, by System Energy

Resources, Inc. (SERI), a subsidiary of Entergy Nuclear. If approved, the permit would give

SERI between 10 and 20 years to decide whether to build one or more nuclear plants on the site

and to file an application with the NRC to begin construction.

The NRC staff’s preliminary recommendation is that a permit should be issued. The

staff’s conclusion is based on its independent review of the Site Safety Analysis Report and the

Environmental Report submitted by SERI, taking into account consultations with federal, state,

tribal and local agencies and consideration of comments received during the public scoping

process. The staff’s preliminary conclusions include a finding that there are no environmentally

preferable or obviously superior sites. The staff’s conclusions, however, are not binding on the

Board, which must make its own independent judgment on the ESP application.

Anyone wishing to submit a written statement or to submit a written request to make an

oral statement may do so by email to hearingdocket@nrc.gov, by fax (301) 415-1101, or by mail

to: Office of the Secretary, Attn. Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, Mail Stop: O-16C1, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. In addition, copies of written
statements or requests to make an oral statement should be sent to the Chairman of the Licensing

Board by e-mail to daw1@nrc.gov, fax (301-415-5599), or by mail to: Administrative Judge

Lawrence G. McDade, c/o Debra Wolf, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, Mail Stop: T3F23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Documents related to the proceeding are available electronically for public inspection in

the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., and on the NRC web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Documents also are available for

inspection at the Harriette Person Memorial Library, located at 606 Main St., Port Gibson.

 ###
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

The Warren and Trumbull Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of The Warren and Trumbull Railroad Company

(WTRC) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. 

§231 et sea. ) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. §351 et sea.) (RUIA).

The WTRC is the operator of rail property owned by the Economic

Development Rail Corporation II, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the 

Mahoning Valley Economic Development Corporation. WTRC is

responsible for all transportation, maintenance, and administrative

matters on the property of Economic Development Rail Corporation

II. WTRC pays Economic Development Rail Corporation II $10.00 per

carload received or delivered. WTRC began operations March 15,

1994, and performs a two to three hour run two to three times a

week; it interchanges with CSXT. WTRC advises that it has no

employees or any equipment. It contracts with the Ohio Central

Railroad, Inc., to provide service.

In cases such as this where an entity has authority to operate a

rail line, but does not actually operate the line in question, the

Board looks to the identity of the entity operating the line and

the nature of the relationship of that entity to the ICC certified

carrier to determine the status of the certified carrier under the 

RRA and RUIA. If the operating entity is itself a carrier employer

covered under the Acts administered by the Board, or if that entity

has been recognized by the ICC as the operator of the line in

question, that entity will be found to be a covered employer with

respect to the operation of the line it has undertaken. If the

certified entity has no involvement in the actual operation of the 

rail line, the Board will find the certified entity not to be a

covered employer under the RRA and the RUIA. However, if the

operating entity is neither a covered employer nor an entity that 

has been recognized by the ICC as the operator of the line, the 

Board will find the certified entity to be a covered employer and

persons operating that line to be employees of the covered

employer.

The WTRC has no employees and operations are conducted by the

employees of another railroad carrier, which is an employer under

the Acts. That employer reports the employee service rendered to 

PRI to the Board. Consistent with above-described analysis of

cases such as this, a majority of the Board finds that WTRC is not 

an employer subject to the Railroad Retirement and Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Acts.

BCD 1996-12
-2-

The Warren and Trumbull Railroad Company

The WTRC is

operation of

reminded to inform the Board of any change in the 

the rail line in this case.

Glen Ij. Bower

V. M, Speakman, Jp/ (Dissenting)
Supreme Court of Florida

____________

No. SC17-984

____________

HARRY FRANKLIN PHILLIPS, 

Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

[January 22, 2018]

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Harry Franklin Phillips’ appeal of the circuit court’s 

order denying Phillips’ motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 

Phillips’ motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s 

decision in Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in 

Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2161 

(2017). This Court stayed Phillips’ appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v. 

State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017). After this 
- 2 -

Court decided Hitchcock, Phillips responded to this Court’s order to show cause 

arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.

After reviewing Phillips’ response to the order to show cause, as well as the 

State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Phillips is not entitled to relief. 

Phillips was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a

vote of seven to five. Phillips v. State, 705 So. 2d 1320, 1321 (Fla. 1997). 

Phillips’ sentence of death became final in 1998. Phillips v. Florida, 525 U.S. 880 

(1998). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Phillips’ sentence of death. 

See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Phillips’ 

motion.

The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Phillips, we 

caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so 

ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.

LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.

I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock 

v. State, 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now 

final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting 

opinion in Hitchcock.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, 

Nushin G. Sayfie, Judge - Case No. 131983CF0004350001XX
- 3 -

Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, William Hennis, and Marta 

Jaszczolt, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Ft. 

Lauderdale, Florida,

for Appellant

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Melissa J. Roca, Assistant Attorney 

General, Miami, Florida,

for Appellee
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Achim Stamm, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer of Aqua Society, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby
  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “Report”) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  

| | By:    | /s/ Achim Stamm                       
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| |        |                                       
| | Name:  | ACHIM STAMM                           
| |        |                                       
| | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer               
| |        |                                       
| | Date:  | May 25, 2005                          

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant
  and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant
  under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether
  made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### §701b–8. Submission of report by Chief of Engineers

It is declared to be the policy of the Congress that the following provisions shall be observed:

No project or any modification not authorized, of a project for flood control or rivers and harbors, shall be authorized by the Congress unless a report for such project or modification has been previously submitted by the Chief of Engineers, United States Army, in conformity with existing law.

(Sept. 3, 1954, ch. 1264, title II, §202, 68 Stat. 1256.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section comprises last two paragraphs of section 202 of act Sept. 3, 1954. First paragraph of section 202 is set out as a note under section 701–1 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior acts:

May 17, 1950, ch. 188, title II, §202, 64 Stat. 170.

June 30, 1948, ch. 771, title II, §202, 62 Stat. 1175.

July 24, 1946, ch. 596, §2, 60 Stat. 641.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Link [electronic resource].**
 
Volume
Number
15
0102030405
16
01020304
17
01020304
18
01020304
19
01020304
20
01020304
21
01020304
22
01020304
23
01020304
24
01020304
 
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.303/4:
Item Number:0455-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000590027
 
January 16, 2020
#### § 575.501 Purpose.

This subpart contains OPM regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 5757, which authorizes the payment of extended assignment incentives. Subject to the requirements of this subpart, an agency may pay an extended assignment incentive to eligible Federal employees assigned to positions located in a territory or possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands who agree to complete a specified additional period of employment with the agency in that location.