alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-049 August 31, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING BOARD EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON VERMONT

YANKEE POWER UPRATE SCHEDULED FOR SEPT. 13-15 IN NEWFANE, VT.

An evidentiary hearing regarding the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant power uprate will be held

starting at 9 a.m. on Wednesday, Sept. 13, at the Windham County Courthouse, 7 Court St. in

Newfane, Vt. The sessions will continue, if necessary, on Sept. 14 and 15.

The hearing will be conducted by a three-judge panel from the NRC’s Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board (ASLB), which is a quasi-judicial arm of the agency that handles licensing matters. 

Its purpose is to allow the New England Coalition (NEC), a public interest group, to present testimony

on a contention it submitted in opposition to a 20-percent power increase implemented at the Vernon,

Vt., reactor earlier this year.

Portions of the hearing will involve proprietary information and will therefore be closed to the

public. Also, all three days may not be needed for completion of the hearing and sessions may extend

into the evening to facilitate completion.

The plant’s owner, Entergy Nuclear, applied to the NRC for the power uprate in September

2003. Subsequently, the Vermont Department of Public Service (DPS) and NEC filed requests for a

hearing on the proposal. An ASLB panel formed to hear the requests ruled in November 2004 that the

DPS and NEC had established standing and that each had submitted two admissible contentions. 

Subsequently, the DPS withdrew its contentions and NEC withdrew one of its contentions. 

Accordingly, the only contention left to be considered at the hearing will be NEC’s argument

pertaining to whether large transient testing should be performed as a condition of uprate.

More information about the hearing is available in the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access

and Management Systems (ADAMS), which is accessible via the agency’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the

NRC’s Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at PDR@NRC.GOV

.

 ###
### SUBCHAPTER II—CRIME PREVENTION
### §190305. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(c) Nondiscrimination.—The requirements for serving as a director or officer may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, age, or national origin.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1450.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190305(a) | 36:5106. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §§1826, 1827, 106 Stat. 2584. |
| 190305(b) | 36:5107. | |
| 190305(c) | 36:5108 (related to directors and officers). | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §1828 (related to directors and officers), 106 Stat. 2585; Nov. 30, 1993, Pub. L. 103–160, title XI, §1182(c)(6), 107 Stat. 1772. |

Section

In subsections (a) and (b), the words "and in conformity with the laws of the State in which it is incorporated" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "The requirements for serving as a director or officer" are substituted for "in determining the requirements for serving on the board of directors or as an officer of the corporation" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2075 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 337
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2075

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                            October 27, 2003

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, as the 
             ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1905 
West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post 
Office Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 337

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2075

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm Beach, Florida, as the 
             ``Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 27, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### § 532.225 Nonappropriated fund survey jobs.

(a) A lead agency shall survey the following required jobs:

| Job title | Job grade |
| --- | --- |
| Janitor (Light) | 1 |
| Food Service Worker | 1 |
| Food Service Worker | 2 |
| Fast Food Worker | 2 |
| Janitor | 2 |
| Laborer (Light) | 2 |
| Laborer (Heavy) | 3 |
| Service Station Attendant | 3 |
| Stock Handler | 4 |
| Short Order Cook | 5 |
| Materials Handling Equipment Operator | 5 |
| Warehouseman | 5 |
| Service Station Attendant | 5 |
| Truck Driver (Light) | 5 |
| Truck Driver (Medium) | 6 |
| Truck Driver (Heavy) | 7 |
| Cook | 8 |
| Carpenter | 9 |
| Painter | 9 |
| Automotive Mechanic | 10 |
| Electrician | 10 |

(b) A lead agency may not omit a required survey job from a regular schedule wage survey.

(c) A lead agency may survey the following jobs on an optional basis:

| Job title | Job grade |
| --- | --- |
| Service Station Attendant | 1 |
| Groundskeeper | 4 |
| Grill Attendant | 4 |
| Tractor Operator | 6 |
| Bowling Equipment Mechanic | 7 |
| Building Maintenance Worker | 7 |
| Vending Machine Mechanic | 8 |
| Building Maintenance Worker | 8 |
| Air Conditioning Equipment Mechanic | 8 |
| Truck Driver (Trailer) | 8 |
| Air Conditioning Equipment Mechanic | 10 |

(d) A lead agency must obtain prior approval of OPM to add a job not listed under paragraph (a) or (c) of this section.

[55 FR 46143, Nov. 1, 1990]
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Stefan
Parker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Stefan ParkerStefan
      ParkerChief
      Financial OfficerExecutive
      Vice President, FinancePrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      14, 2009
§ 2417.202 Factors that the decision-maker will consider. The Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel, as appropriate, in his or her sole discretion, may grant an employee permission to testify on matters relating to official information, or produce official records and information, in response to a request or demand. Among the relevant factors that the Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel may consider in making this decision are whether: ( a ) The purposes of this part are met;
( b ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
( c ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would assist or hinder the FLRA in performing its statutory duties;
( d ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in the best interest of the FLRA;
( e ) The records or testimony can be obtained from other sources;
( f ) The request or demand is unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the request or demand arose;
( g ) Disclosure would violate a statute, Executive Order or regulation;
( h ) Disclosure would reveal confidential, sensitive, or privileged information; trade secrets or similar, confidential or financial information; otherwise protected information; or information that would otherwise be inappropriate for release;
( i ) Disclosure would impede or interfere with an ongoing law-enforcement investigation or proceeding, or compromise constitutional rights or national-security interests;
( j ) Disclosure would result in the FLRA appearing to favor one litigant over another;
( k ) The request was served before the demand;
( l ) A substantial Government interest is implicated;
( m ) The request or demand is within the authority of the party making it;
( n ) The request or demand is sufficiently specific to be answered; and
( o ) Any other factor deemed relevant under the circumstances of the particular request or demand.
[74 FR 11640, Mar. 19, 2009,as amended at 81 FR 63363, Sept. 15, 2016]
#### Martin Lowe, Appellant, v. Michael Benetar, Doing Business as Congo Trading Co., Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00768-CV

Mark HOMER a/k/a Doc’s Space Center,

Appellant

v.

Ernesto MARTINEZ,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 380903A

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2018

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

In this appeal, the clerk’s record was due on October 29, 2018. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. 

A few days later, the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that Appellant Mark Homer 

a/k/a Doc’s Space Center had not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not 

entitled to a free clerk’s record. 

On November 15, 2018, we ordered Appellant to file written proof with this court by 

November 26, 2018, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made 

to pay the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We 
04-18-00768-CV

- 2 -

warned Appellant that if he failed to respond as ordered, this appeal would be dismissed for want 

of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

To date, Appellant has not filed any response with this court. Therefore, we dismiss this 

appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM
#### § 297.601 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement the requirements of the Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 to limit the use of Social Security numbers on documents mailed by the Office of Personnel and Management (OPM). The subpart applies to all written or printed documents that OPM sends by mail that include a complete or partial Social Security number.
### **CHAPTERS 313 THROUGH 399—RESERVED**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(b)(2), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2836, added placeholder for chapters 313 to 399.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Stephen Perry, Respondent, against Jacob W. Osmann et al., Constituting the Board of Assessors in and for the City of Long Beach, Nassau County, Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXVI—GRANT PROGRAM TO EVALUATE AND IMPROVE EDUCATIONAL METHODS AT PRISONS, JAILS, AND JUVENILE FACILITIES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was comprised of part JJ of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, Pub. L. 90–351, as added by Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §114(2), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 677, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §502(c)(1), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5228. Another part JJ of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 is classified to subchapter XXXV (§10671) of this chapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #3642]

                    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency—effective September 30, 2004, the above                           ( print page 64801)                        numbered declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning September 27, 2004, and continuing through September 30, 2004.                

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is December 17, 2004 and for economic injury the deadline is July 18, 2005.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 59008).

Dated: November 1, 2004.

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-24816 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §154301. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Navy Club of the United States of America (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1434.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 154301(a) | 36:140. | June 6, 1940, ch. 239, §§1, 3(a), 54 Stat. 232, 233. |
| 154301(b) | 36:140b(a). | |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate obsolete words.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-028 February 25, 2004

 NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FROM

 EXTENDED OPERATION OF VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has issued its final environmental impact

statement on the proposed renewal of the operating license of the Virgil C. Summer nuclear power

plant. In its statement, the NRC found there are no environmental impacts that would preclude license

renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The V.C. Summer nuclear facility is located 26 miles from Columbia, South Carolina. The

current operating license expires on August 6, 2022. South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, the

operator of the plant, submitted an application for renewal of the license on August 6, 2002.

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held two public meetings near

the plant to discuss the scope of the review and a draft version of the environmental impact statement

for the facility. Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and

representatives of State and Federal agencies.

Copies of the statement are available electronically on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement15/index.html .

The report also is available for public inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room, www.pdr.gov ,

located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, or by calling 1-800-397-

4209 or 301-415-4737. 

 ###
visitation determinations. See Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019,

922 P.2d 541, 543 (1996) (providing that child custody decisions rest within the district court's sound discretion). The district court made findings under the factors set forth in NRS 125.480(4) and determined that the custody and visitation arrangement was in the children's best interests. SeeNRS 125.480(1) (stating that in determining child custody, the court's sole consideration is the child's best interest). The district court's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence. See Rico v. Rodriguez, 121 Nev. 695, 701, 120 P.3d 812, 816 (2005).

Appellant next contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his requests to continue the trial based on discovery issues and a change in trial counsel. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the requests. See Bongiovi v. Sullivan, 122 Nev. 556, 570, 138 P.3d 433, 444 (2006). Finally, appellant contends that the district court abused its discretion in ruling that the Hummer vehicle was community property rather than appellant's separate property. In support of this argument, appellant identifies his testimony that he purchased the vehicle with proceeds from his personal injury settlement. See NRS 123.130(2) (providing that all property acquired by a spouse as an award for personal injury damages is separate property). Appellant has identified no documentary evidence in support of this claim, however, and the district court found that appellant failed to establish clear and convincing evidence tracing the personal injury settlement to the purchase of the vehicle. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion as to this issue. See Shydler v. Shydler, 114 Nev. 192, 196, 954 P.2d 37, 39

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2EaSE



### (1998) (explaining that this court reviews a district court's decision regarding divorce proceedings for an abuse of discretion). Accordingly, having concluded that appellant's contentions are without merit, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Hardesty 

# P
0.4.0 1 t Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division Robert E. Gaston, Settlement Judge Stephens, Gourley & Bywater Barnes Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 

### 3

ilWAIENC22 111
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2108

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand and extend the 

eligibility of Hispanic-serving institutions for assistance under title V 

of that Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2003

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to expand 

and extend the eligibility of Hispanic-serving institutions 

for assistance under title V of that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hispanic-Serving Insti5 tution Assistance Improvement Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 2108 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY OF HISPANIC-SERVING 

2 INSTITUTIONS: ELIMINATION OF WAIT-OUT 

3 PERIOD. 

4 Section 504(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

5 (20 U.S.C. 1101c(a)) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(a) AWARD PERIOD.—The Secretary may award a 

7 grant to a Hispanic-serving institution under this title for 

8 5 years.’’.

Æ
NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM 

EXTENDED OPERATION OF WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has completed its final environmental impact 

statement on the proposed renewal of the operating license for the Wolf Creek nuclear power 

plant. The report contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would 

preclude license renewal for an additional 20 years of operation. 

The Wolf Creek Generating Station is a pressurized water reactor located about 4 miles 

northeast of Burlington, Kans. The current operating license expires March 11, 2025. The 

operator, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp., submitted an application for renewal of the 

license Oct. 4, 2006. 

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held public meetings 

near the plant to discuss the scope of the review and the draft version of the environmental 

impact statement. Comments were received and considered from members of the public, local 

officials, and representatives of state and federal agencies. 

Publication of the final environmental impact statement does not represent final NRC 

action on the license renewal application. The agency staff is completing its safety evaluation 

report, and the NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will evaluate that report and 

make its recommendation before the agency makes a final decision. 

The Wolf Creek final environmental impact statement is available on the NRC’s Web site 

at this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement32/. 

The Wolf Creek license renewal application is posted at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/wolf-creek.html. 

Additional information about the license renewal process is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-096 May 16, 2008
The report is also available for review at the Coffey County Public Library, Burlington 

Branch, 410 Juniatta St., Burlington. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.