alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1883 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1883

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1601-1 Main Street in Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``Eddie Mae Steward 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1601-1 
Main Street in Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Eddie Mae Steward Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Eddie Mae Steward Post 
Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL GOVERNING BODIES
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                             Chief Executive Officer

I, John Long, Chief Executive Officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed Amendment No. 1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of
FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 26, 2003                           /s/ JOHN LONG
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              John Long
                                              Chief Executive Officer
### Court of Appeal s, State of Michigan ORD ER Heather Ann Kimball v Timothy Roland Pearson Jr Docket No. 335639 LC No. 2010-002626 DM Elizabeth L. Gleicher Presiding Judge Michael J . Kelly Douglas B. Shapiro

Judges

Pursuant to the opinion issued concmTently with this order, this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this Court. We retain jurisdiction. Proceedings on remand in this matter shall commence within 56 days of the Clerk's certification of this order, and they shall be given p1iority on remand until they are concluded. As stated in the accompanying opinion, we remand this case to the trial court so that it may conduct an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motion and reconsider its ruling. The proceedings on remand are limited to this issue. The parties shall promptly file with this Court a copy of all papers filed on remand . Within seven days after entry, appell ant shall fi le with this Comi copies of all orders entered on remand. The transcript of all proceedings on remand shall be prepared and filed within 21 days after completion of the proceedings.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W . Zimmer Jr ., Chief Clerk , on 

# Jll 25 2011 Date
## Dock et No. FAA - 2011 - 0646 C ontacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman ATA M Lopez
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

Ken Schwarz
Intersections, Inc.

December 14, 2001

Dear Ken,

During the renegotiation of our licensing agreement with Intersections I
realized we have been operating under a verbal agreement on the processing of
the monitoring files.

This is a note to confirm our arrangement.

DMS will perform the monitoring for intersections on a monthly basis; this
consists of the following high-level tasks.

- Receipt of monitoring on a weekly or monthly basis as determined by
  Intersections
- Conversion of request files to inquiry files to be sent to bureaus
- Receipt and importing of archive reports from EFX, TU and XPN
- Management and execution of three applications, Monitoring, AQR and CQCU
- QC of Monitoring, AQR and CQCU results files prior to delivery via ftp
- Providing monitoring results reports segregated by product
- Research of QC issues from Intersections
- Provision of attribute information to be utilized for Credit Analyzer and
  Automated QC efforts
- Mutually agree on service level objectives

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For this service Intersections will pay DMS $20,000, per month and agrees to
give DMS one year notice if Intersections decides it no longer wished DMS to
provide these services.

Thanks,

/s/ David A. McGough
----------------------------
David A. McGough
Digital Matrix Systems, Inc.


Agreed to by

/s/ Kenneth Schwarz
----------------------------
Kenneth Schwarz
CFO
Intersections
### Part D—Equal Justice for Women in Courts
Regulations to reduce volatile organic compound emissions from nonfumigant pesticide products

(DPR Regulation No. 12-001)

Enclosure 4

A copy of the rulemaking file for this set of VOC regulations. The documents 

listed below are included in the rulemaking file. Documents that are not 

part of the submittal to US EPA are so noted. 

• Notice of proposed rulemaking

• Text of regulations originally noticed to the public

• Initial statement of reasons

• Economic and fiscal impact statement 

• Correspondence with the Department of Finance regarding 

proposed regulations 

• Correspondence with the California Department of Food and 

Agriculture

• Statement of mailing notice

• Written comments received during the 45-day comment 

period

• Public hearing transcript

• Statement of mailing 15-day notice

• Notice of modifications to the text of proposed changes in the 

regulations pertaining to field fumigant emission reduction; 

and modified text of proposed regulations

• Written comments received during the 15-day comment 

period 

• Statement of mailing second 15-day notice

• Notice of second modifications to text; and text of second 

modified regulations

• Written comments received during the second 15-day public 

comment period

• Updated informative digest

• Final statement of reasons

• Documents relied upon – not part of the submittal
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-12T20:22:00Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-12T20:22:01Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-12T20:22:01Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="16768">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-12T20:22:00Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION t O-7110 WAS NEVER ISSUED OK - _ 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
### §11277. Evaluation and information

#### (a) In general

If a grantee receives grants for 3 consecutive fiscal years under part A, B, C, D, or E (in the alternative), then the Secretary shall evaluate such grantee on-site, not less frequently than once in the period of such 3 consecutive fiscal years, for purposes of—

(1) determining whether such grants are being used for the purposes for which such grants are made by the Secretary;

(2) collecting additional information for the report required by section 11275 of this title; and

(3) providing such information and assistance to such grantee as will enable such grantee to improve the operation of the centers, projects, and activities for which such grants are made.

#### (b) Cooperation

Recipients of grants under this subchapter shall cooperate with the Secretary's efforts to carry out evaluations, and to collect information, under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title III, §386, formerly §364, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7278, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4458; renumbered §384, Pub. L. 102–586, §3(g)(1)(A)(ii), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5022; renumbered §386 and amended Pub. L. 106–71, §3(l), Oct. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1039.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5732 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–71 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) The Secretary shall develop for each fiscal year, and publish annually in the Federal Register for public comment a proposed plan specifying the subject priorities the Secretary will follow in making grants under this subchapter for such fiscal year.

"(b) Taking into consideration comments received in the 45-day period beginning on the date the proposed plan is published, the Secretary shall develop and publish, before December 31 of such fiscal year, a final plan specifying the priorities referred to in subsection (a) of this section."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1988, but not applicable with respect to fiscal year 1989, see section 7296(a), (b)(2) of Pub. L. 100–690, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 11101 of this title.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-07-009 April 17, 2007

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR FT. CALHOUN NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in Omaha, Neb., on April 24, with

representatives of the Omaha Public Power District to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety

performance for last year at the Ft. Calhoun nuclear plant near Omaha.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the

Omaha Mariott, 10220 Regency Circle, Omaha.

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer

questions from the public on the safety performance of Ft. Calhoun, as well as the NRC’s role in

ensuring safe plant operation.

 “The NRC continually reviews the performance of Ft. Calhoun and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett said. 

“This meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety

performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2006 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/fcs_2006q4.pdf .

The NRC utilizes color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess

nuclear power plant performance. The colors start with "green" and then increase to "white,"

"yellow" or "red," commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 
The NRC said Ft. Calhoun operated safely during 2006, but has yet to reach a final

determination on the safety significance of one violation related to an improperly installed valve

in the plant’s containment spray system. It also identified 13 “green” violations in the area of

human performance during the assessment period. NRC will continue to focus attention on this

area as part of its baseline inspections during 2007. 

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant performance to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are activities associated with

engineering, fire protection, emergency preparedness, maintenance and radiological controls.

Current performance information for Ft. Calhoun is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FCS/fcs_chart.html .

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
# L_2017008EN.01001601.xml

| 12.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/16

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 186/2015

of 10 July 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/26]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Decision No 585/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall service (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decision No 585/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall service (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 17ke (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 305/2013) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘17kf. | 32014 D 0585: Decision No 585/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the deployment of the interoperable EU-wide eCall service (OJ L 164, 3.6.2014, p. 6).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘17kf.

Article 2

The text of Decision No 585/2014/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 July 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 164, 3.6.2014, p. 6.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN BETTWIESER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BILLY GANS, AKA William Gans, AKA Billy Gantz; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35631

D.C. No. 1:15

- cv

- 00493

- EJL

- REB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY , M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Martin Bettwieser appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Freedom of Information Ac t

(“FOIA”) and Privacy Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S. F ood & D rug Admin. , 836 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35631

987, 989

- 90 (9th Cir. 2016) (summary judgment); Cervantes v. Countrywide Home

Loans, Inc. , 656 F .3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011) (dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P.

12(b)(6))

. We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for the United States

Postal Service because Bettwieser failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact

as to whether he submitted a request under FOIA and the Privacy Act. See 39

C.F.R. § 265.7(a)(1 )

- (2) (2015) (describing requirements for submitting a FOIA

request); 39 C.F.R. § 266.6(a) (2015) (describing requirements for submitting a

Privacy Act request).

The district court properly dismissed the individual defendants because

individual s are not proper defendants in a FOIA or Privacy Act action

. See Drake

v. Obama , 664 F.3d 774, 785 (9th Cir. 2011) ( “FOIA does not apply to any of the

Defendants because they are all individuals, not agencies

. ”); Rouse v. U.S. Dep’t of

State , 567 F.3d 408, 413 n.3 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Privacy Act only permits suits

against an ‘agency

. ’”).

We reject as without merit Bettwieser’s contention s concerning disco very,

default judgment, the representation of defendants by the Office of United States

Attorney s, and Biv ens remedies.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued3 17

- 35631

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
#### Richard Sexton, as Administrator of the Estate of Richard E. Sexton, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Church in the Gardens, Respondent.

Action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, an infant four years of age, as the result of drowning in a swimming pool owned, maintained and controlled by the defendant. Judgment in favor of defendant, entered on the verdict of a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion, Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johns ton, Adel and Wenzel JJ.
#### § 2606.105 Rules for individuals seeking to ascertain if they are the subject of a record.

An individual seeking to ascertain if any OGE system of records contains a record pertaining to him must follow the access procedures set forth at § 2606.201(a) and (b).