alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-018 April 14, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT McGUIRE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Duke Energy officials

April 19 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the McGuire nuclear power

plant, located near Huntersville, N. C. The period covered is the calendar year 2004.

The 1:00 p.m. meeting at the McGuire Office Complex on the plant site is open to public

observation. Before the meeting ends, NRC staff will be available to answer public questions on the

plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff rates the performance of the McGuire plant and all of the nation’s

other commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and with

residents near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer any

questions people may have about our oversight.”

Overall, the McGuire plant operated safely during 2004. The NRC uses color-coded inspection

findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant performance. The colors start with “green”

and increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of the issues

involved. The McGuire plant had nothing classified beyond “green” during 2004. Based on these

results and overall performance, McGuire will receive the baseline, or normal, level of inspections

during 2005. The NRC also plans several additional inspections including routine inspections of the

plant’s independent spent fuel storage installation, inspections of pressurizer penetration nozzles and

steam space piping connections, and operator licensing examinations.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/mcg_2004q4.pdf .

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

inspection specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville,

Md. 

Current information for the McGuire plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG1/mcg1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG2/mcg2_chart.html .

###
### §101. Inventions patentable

Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 797.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §31 (R.S. 4886, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §1, 29 Stat. 692, (2) May 23, 1930, ch. 312, §1, 46 Stat. 376, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 450, §1, 53 Stat. 1212).

The corresponding section of existing statute is split into two sections, section 101 relating to the subject matter for which patents may be obtained, and section 102 defining statutory novelty and stating other conditions for patentability.

Section 101 follows the wording of the existing statute as to the subject matter for patents, except that reference to plant patents has been omitted for incorporation in section 301 and the word "art" has been replaced by "process", which is defined in section 100. The word "art" in the corresponding section of the existing statute has a different meaning than the same word as used in other places in the statute; it has been interpreted by the courts as being practically synonymous with process or method. "Process" has been used as its meaning is more readily grasped than "art" as interpreted, and the definition in section 100(b) makes it clear that "process or method" is meant. The remainder of the definition clarifies the status of processes or methods which involve merely the new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material; they are processes or methods under the statute and may be patented provided the conditions for patentability are satisfied.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Limitation on Issuance of Patents

Pub. L. 112–29, §33, Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 340, provided that:

"(a) Limitation.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism.

"(b) Effective Date.—

"(1) In general.—Subsection (a) shall apply to any application for patent that is pending on, or filed on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act [Sept. 16, 2011].

"(2) Prior applications.—Subsection (a) shall not affect the validity of any patent issued on an application to which paragraph (1) does not apply."
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION BY CHARLES B. SILCOX



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1359, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxely Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief
Financial Officer of The Brickman Group, Ltd. (the Company) does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1. |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 8 ,2003



|                       
|-----------------------
|Charles B. Silcox      
|Chief Financial Officer



.
Discussion of Clothianidin Pollinators DCI Requirement 

 September 23, 2013 3- 4:30 PM Eastern Time

EPA – Washington, DC CDPR – Sacramento, CA PMRA –Ottawa, ON

Objectives : 

1) Summary of existing and the on-going laboratory and field data to 

support DCIs

2) Discussion and Identification of additional agency needs

( Reference to the information provided to EPA on 9-10-2013) 

Participated Attendee lists as of 9/17 /13

USA

EPA Valent Bayer 

Scientists EFED :

Michael Wagman

Bill Eckel

Reuben Baris

Mark Corbin

Meghan Radtke

Frank Farruggia

Dana Spatz

Kristina Garber

Nathan Miller

Richard Allen David Fischer

Dan Dyer

Allen 

Olmstead

Registration PRD: 

Rusty Wasem

Tom Moriarty

Neil Anderson

Stephen Snyderman

Carissa Cyran

Sue Shen

Julie Schlekau

Eric Tamichi

(call-in)

Jamin Huang 

(call-in)

RD : 

Meredith Laws

Marianne Lewis 

Canada ( All Call-In)

PMRA Valent Bayer 

Scientists Wayne Hou

Connie Hart

Tim McDonald

Janice Villeneuve

Nicole McKenzie

Barbara Martinovic 

Barrett

Registration Tina Singal

Christian Bart

Kit Nelson

Lynn Lee

Beth Connor Jeff Parsons
 DPR ( All Call-In)

Scientists Rich Bierly

Carlos Gutierrez

John Troiano

Registration Denise Alder

Ann Pritchard

Mary Lou VerderCarlos
### §30503. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are patriotic, educational, social, and for service, and include—

(1) perpetuating the Blue Star Mothers of America, Inc., and the memory of all the men and women who have served our country as members of the Armed Forces;

(2) maintaining true allegiance to the Government of the United States;

(3) educating members of the corporation and others not to divulge military, naval, or other Government information;

(4) assisting in veterans' ceremonies;

(5) attending patriotic rallies and meetings;

(6) fostering true democracy;

(7) caring for unsupported mothers who gave their sons to the service of the Nation;

(8) aiding in bringing about recognition of the need for permanent civilian defense in each community and the need to be always alert against invasion of un-American activities;

(9) upholding the American institutions of freedom, justice, and equal rights; and

(10) defending the United States from all enemies.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1320.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30503 | 36:943. | July 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–653, §3, 74 Stat. 515. |

Section

Before clause (1), the words "The purposes of the corporation are patriotic, educational, social, and for service, and include" are substituted for "The purposes of the corporation shall be" and "the further object of this organization shall be patriotic, educational, social, and for service" for clarity.

In clause (3), the words "members of the corporation" are substituted for "our members" for clarity.

In clause (8), the words "the need for" are substituted for "the need of", and the words "in each community" are substituted for "for each community", for clarity. The words "the need" are added for clarity. The words "to be always alert" are substituted for "to ever be alert" for clarity.
### §115. Loyalty Day

(a) Designation.—May 1 is Loyalty Day.

(b) Purpose.—Loyalty Day is a special day for the reaffirmation of loyalty to the United States and for the recognition of the heritage of American freedom.

(c) Proclamation.—The President is requested to issue a proclamation—

(1) calling on United States Government officials to display the flag of the United States on all Government buildings on Loyalty Day; and

(2) inviting the people of the United States to observe Loyalty Day with appropriate ceremonies in schools and other suitable places.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1257.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 115(a) | 36:162 (1st–13th words). | July 18, 1958, Pub. L. 85–529, 72 Stat. 369. |
| 115(b) | 36:162 (14th word–semicolon). | |
| 115(c) | 36:162 (words after semicolon). | |

Section
# L_2017161EN.01006001.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/60

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 273/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1062]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/995 of 8 June 2015 amending Decision 2012/757/EU concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/995 of 8 June 2015 amending Decision 2012/757/EU concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘operation and traffic management’ subsystem of the rail system in the European Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 37dl (Commission Decision 2012/757/EU) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 0995: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/995 of 8 June 2015 (OJ L 165, 30.6.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 0995: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/995 of 8 June 2015 (OJ L 165, 30.6.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) 2015/995 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 165, 30.6.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of BioTex Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Scott Silverman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of BioTex Holdings, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bio-Tex Holdings, Inc. |

 
| By:    | */s/*   *Scott Silverman*

Scott SilvermanChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer, and 
Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: November 14, 2005

 

 

 

 

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Sheamus Toal, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New York & Company, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: September 1, 2010

/s/ SHEAMUS TOAL Sheamus Toal Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
### The Safe Level of Fossil Carbon Emissions? Zero! By Wilfred Candler February, 2014 "I challenge the EPA in reporting in Carbon Pollution from New Power Plsnts, to say what it believes the safe level of atmospheric Carbon Dioxide to be." First the good news: 

### We are not short of energy. "Climate Forcing" is positive meaning that Earth receives (slightly) more radiant energy, than it emits into space. Some bad news: 

### This imbalance causes Earth to become (slightly) warmer year after year. Causation: 

### The imbalance is caused by our use of fossil fuels (coal, natural gas and oil) that add carbon dioxide(CO2) to the atmosphere, thus blocking some of the infrared radiation that would otherwise send energy into space: This property of gaseous CO2 has been known to physicists since 1859, when it was discovered by John Tyndall. Our use of fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm (part per million) of CO2 to the atmosphere each year. Currently we are at about 400 ppm. For 800,000 years prior to tbe use of fossil fuels (starting in say 1750), atmospheric CO2 had never been above 300 ppm, 

### as shown in the ice-core data (see next page),we have had 800 thousand 

### years experience with atmospheric CO2 at or below 300 ppm. Currently we are at 400 ppm, but there is no reason to believe t,tiat this i.s safe. 

### There are vicious fast and slow feed-back mechanisms that add to the direct effect of CO2. For instance as the Earth warms there is less polar ice, which means that less of the incoming radiation from the sun is reflected back into space; instead the open water absorbs the radiation leading to faster warming. (The first ice-free day in the arctic is expected in 2016.) The most threatening feed-back mechanism is from methane asm1
30
E 7M n

U 3"
fM 

### ice Core Data

Antarctic Ice Core Data 1

~ law

~ yrMr ~ vriMwn -007 CentuiuMw.

I i i i S i I I Years BP

arctic permafrost melts and decays anaerobically; and from methane currently sequestered in the form of "methane clathrate" (a combination of ice and methane, which may be released as atmospheric methane as the.ice melts). Depending on the strength of these feed-back mechanisms, the Earth might continue to warm even if we stopped using fossil fuels. These fast and slow feed-backs are so strong, that it is estimated that only 150 of the warming effect of added CO2 comes from the direct insulating effect discovered by John Tyndale, the other 85% comes from slow and fast feed-backs some of which take decades to fully work themselves out. (see http://www.apollo-gaia.org/ ... on the web. 

### I challenge the EPA in reporting in Carbon Pollution from New Power Plants, to say what it believes the safe level of atmospheric Carbon Dioxide to be. Wilfred Candler, Ph.D., D.Sc. 410-757-5626 1514 Winchester Rd, Annapolis, MD, 21401 wcandlerl@gmail.com ~

~ U
Z 0

~

r N
### §190311. Service of process

The corporation shall comply with the law on service of process of each State in which it is incorporated and each State in which it carries on activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1451.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 190311 | 36:5104. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §1824, 106 Stat. 2584. |

Section
<PAGE>

Exhibit No. 10(Y)

                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
                      EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
                        (2003 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT)

         WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation
   Plan is currently maintained pursuant to a 2003 Amendment and Restatement
   ("Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend the Plan further;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the respects hereinafter
   set forth, effective November 14, 2003:

         1.       Article 1, Section 1.18 of the Plan is hereby amended and
                  restated in its entirety to provide as follows:

   1.18           "Gainsharing Award" means any bonus or other incentive award
payable with respect to a Plan Year under The Progressive Corporation 2004
Gainsharing Plan, The Progressive Corporation 2004 Information Technology
Incentive Plan, The 2004 Progressive Capital Management Bonus Plan, The
Progressive Corporation 1999 Executive Bonus Plan (as amended on January 31,
2003) or any other plan or program as may be designated by the Committee.

         2.       Article 2, Section 2.3 of the Plan is hereby amended and
restated in its entirety to provide as follows:

   2.3            Fixed Deferral Periods.

If an Eligible Executive wishes to defer receipt of all or a portion of any
Award for a fixed period of time ("Fixed Deferral Period"), then his/her
Deferral Agreement relating to such Award shall specify that Fixed Deferral
Period. Such Fixed Deferral Period shall not be less than three (3) years
following (i) in the case of a deferral of all or a portion of a Gainsharing
Award, the end of the Plan Year in which the Gainsharing Award will be earned
and (ii) in the case of a deferral of a Restricted Stock Award, the end of the
Plan Year in which the last of the restrictions applicable to the Restricted
Stock Award expire. In the case of a Restricted Stock Award as to which
restrictions expire in installments, the Fixed Deferral Period must end on the
same date for all installments. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this
Section 2.3, Eligible Executives may not elect a Fixed Deferral Period with
respect to the deferral of any Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award.

         3.       Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the terms and
                  provisions of the Plan shall remain entirely unchanged and
                  continue in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto caused this Amendment
to be executed by its duly authorized representative effective as of the date
set forth above.

THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION

By: /s/ Charles E. Jarrett
    ----------------------------------------------------
Title: Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer
#### L. Michel Plumbing & Heating Corporation, Respondent, v. Marpearl Holding Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Mo opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-178-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)