alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
      Corp., Manager of the RegistrantFebruary
      13, 2009
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, John C. Garrison,certify that:

-  I have	reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc.;Based on my	knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material	fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,	in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not	misleading with respect to the period covered by this report	Based on my	knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information	included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the	financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small	business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The small	business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for	establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined	in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer	and have:-  Designed		such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure		controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure		that material information relating to the small business issuer,		including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others		within those entities, particularly during the period in which this		report is being prepared;Evaluated		the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and		procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the		end		of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andDisclosed		in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal		control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business		issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth		fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially		affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.-  The small	business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on	our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to	the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small	business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent	functions):-  All		significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or		operation of internal control over financial reporting which are		reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's		ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;		andAny fraud,		whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who		have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control		over financial reporting.
 

 

Date: April 27, 2005

 

 

/s/ John C.Garrison                         

John C. Garrison,

Chief FinancialOfficer
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
      statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended September 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
      Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.




/s/David
                SalzmanDavid
                SalzmanChief
                Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
                Corp., Manager of the RegistrantNovember
                13, 2008
# L_2018215EN.01004001.xml

| 23.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 215/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 215/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 241/2016

of 2 December 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing, and certification) and Annex X (Services in general) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1179]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Recommendation 2013/461/EU of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Recommendation 2013/461/EU of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Recommendation 2013/461/EU replaces Commission Recommendation 2001/893/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be replaced under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Recommendation 2013/461/EU replaces Commission Recommendation 2001/893/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be replaced under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex II and Annex X to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II and Annex X to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’ in Chapter XX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement, the text of point 5 (Commission Recommendation 2001/893/EC) is deleted.

Article 2

The following is inserted after point 3a (Commission Implementing Decision 2014/89/EU) of Annex X to the EEA Agreement:

‘
  ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE

| 1. | 32013 H 0461: Commission Recommendation 2013/461/EU of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing SOLVIT (OJ L 249, 19.9.2013, p. 10).’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 3

The text of Recommendation 2013/461/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 December 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 249, 19.9.2013, p. 10.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 331, 15.12.2001, p. 79.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
SECURITY ASSESSMENT 

DRAFT RULEMAKING AND 

PROCESS DEVELOPMENT 

UPDATE

July 25, 2006
Draft Rulemaking Purpos

• Requires a security assessment by 

applicants to analyze and establish, early stage, security design features provide minimal reliance on operatioprograms

• Rule would supplement requirement

73.55, App. B, App. C 
Applicability

• Rule requirements would apply to 

applicants for construction permit, operating licenses, design certificatiocombined licenses and manufacturinlicenses, with applications after effecdate 

• Applicants to conduct assessment fo

scope of design (site, security prograwithin the scope of the application
Content of Assessmen

• Target Set Analysis• Evaluation methodologies• Threat scenarios • Security design features• Results of the assessment that ensu

security objectives are met with less reliance on operational programs
Draft Rulemaking

Proposed Schedule

• Public meetings (and posted rule 

language)

• Proposed rule due to Commission 

September 30, 2006

• Public comment• Final rule (September 2007)
Standard

Set of Site & 

Security

Characteristics

Design 

E

Target setAnalysis

COL 

Application

Detect, Delay, Assessment

Response

Characterize

Facility 

Design

Design

Physical

Protection

System

(Evaluation)

Objectives

met?

Actual

Set of Site & 

Security 

Characteristics

• High Assurance -DBT• Mitigation Measures

-Define Objectives -Threat-Set of Scenarios

SECURITY ASSESSMENT CONCE

Less reliaProgram
Security Assessment Guida

Document Developmen

• Format & Content Guide • Revise NUREG/CR-1345 • Final draft documents February 200
Implementation Considerat

• Workshop/Pilot security assessment

performed prior to final rule 
Questions
Points of Contact

Eileen McKennaOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulatio301-415-2189Doug HuyckOffice of Nuclear Security and Incid

Response

301-415-5992
DOE TO “WALK THROUGH” ITS YUCCA MOUNTAIN APPLICATION 

IN PUBLIC MEETING JUNE 19-20 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

 Officials from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will present a “walk-through” of 

DOE’s license application for the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca 

Mountain, Nev., for Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff during a public meeting June 19-20 at 

NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

 DOE submitted the license application June 3. The NRC staff is currently conducting its 

docketing review of the application, to determine whether the application is sufficiently complete 

to warrant docketing it and beginning a full technical safety review. During the public walkthrough, DOE officials will explain the layout and organization of the application, which totals 

more than 8,600 pages. 

 The meeting will be held in the NRC Auditorium in Two White Flint North, 11545 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.. from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time each day. Both 

sessions will be viewable by videoconference at the NRC’s Las Vegas Hearing Facility, Pacific 

Enterprise Plaza, Building 1, 3250 Pepper Lane in Las Vegas, and at the Center for Nuclear 

Waste Regulatory Analyses, Conference Room A103, Building 189, 6220 Culebra Rd., San 

Antonio, Texas. 

 Members of the media wishing to attend, either in Rockville or Las Vegas, are urged to 

register by June 18 with the NRC Office of Public Affairs at (301) 415-8200, in order to 

facilitate security check-in for the meetings. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-116 June 16, 2008
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NF
      Energy
      Saving Corporation of America (the
      "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wang,
      Li Hua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Wang, Li Hua


Wang,
      Li
      Hua


Chief
      Financial Officer





May
      15,
      2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
EXHIBIT 23


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8, File Nos. 333-46438 and 333-89148, of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
of our report dated January 23, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" and SFAS 147, "Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions."



/s/ KPMG LLP


Providence, Rhode Island
March 25, 2003

<PAGE>  24
#### § 8.3 Appointment of persons not citizens of the United States.

Persons who are not citizens of the United States may be recruited overseas and appointed to overseas positions without regard to the Civil Service Act.
§ 630.1205 Intermittent leave or reduced leave schedule. ( a ) Leave under § 630.1203(a) (1) or (2) of this part shall not be taken intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule unless the employee and the agency agree to do so.
( b ) Leave under § 630.1203(a)(3) or (4) may be taken intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule when medically necessary, subject to §§ 630.1207 and 630.1208 (b)(6). Leave under § 630.1203(a)(5) may be taken on an intermittent or reduced leave schedule basis, subject to §§ 630.1207 and 630.1209.
( c ) If an employee takes leave under § 630.1203(a) (3) or (4) of this part intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule that is foreseeable based on planned medical treatment or recovery from a serious health condition, the agency may place the employee temporarily in an available alternative position for which the employee is qualified and that can better accommodate recurring periods of leave. Upon returning from leave, the employee is entitled to be returned to his or her permanent position or an equivalent position, as provided in § 630.1210(a) of this part.
( d ) For the purpose of applying paragraph (c) of this section, an alternative position need not consist of equivalent duties, but must be in the same commuting area and must provide— ( 1 ) An equivalent grade or pay level, including any applicable locality payment under 5 CFR part 531, subpart F; special rate supplement under 5 CFR part 530, subpart C; or similar payment or supplement under other legal authority;
( 2 ) The same type of appointment, work schedule, status, and tenure; and
( 3 ) The same employment benefits made available to the employee in his or her previous position (e.g., life insurance, health benefits, retirement coverage, and leave accrual).
( e ) The agency shall determine the available alternative position that has equivalent pay and benefits consistent with Federal laws, including the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 701) and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 2000e).
( f ) Only the amount of leave taken intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule, as these terms are defined in § 630.1202, shall be subtracted from the total amount of leave available to the employee under § 630.1203 (e) and (f).
[58 FR 39602, July 23, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 3544, Feb. 1, 1996; 61 FR 64453, Dec. 5, 1996; 70 FR 31314, May 31, 2005. Redesignated and amended at 76 FR 60704, 60705, Sept. 30, 2011]
# L_2019180EN.01000101.xml

| 4.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/1

---

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States

The Agreement on Air Transport between Canada and the European Community and its Member States, signed in Brussels on 17 December 2009, entered into force on 16 May 2019, in accordance with Article 23(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 16 April 2019.

---
#### § 316.909 Promotion.

An agency may promote a student appointed for an initial period expected to last more than 1 year but less than 4 years provided the student meets the qualification requirements for the higher graded position, time in grade requirements in 5 CFR part 300, subpart F, and the public notification for the position filled by the student stated the potential for promotion and specified a career ladder.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Castellano, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Kings County, convicting defendant of the crime of murder in the second degree, reversed on the law and new trial ordered. Defendant was deprived of a fair trial by the adverse and improper comments of the prosecutor during the course of summation (1) upon the race of deceased and defendant *(Malinski*v. *New York,*324 U. S. 401, 434; *People*v. *Esposito,*224 N. Y. 370, 373; *Abbate*v. *Solan,*257 App. Div. 776; *Saunders*v. *Champlain Bus Corp.,*263 App. Div. 683), (2) upon the exercise by defendant of the right of peremptory challenge, together with appeals to individual jurors *(People*v. *Creasy,*236 N. Y. 205, 226), and (3) upon defendant’s retention of an attorney and the payment of a fee to him, a subject on which defendant also had been improperly cross-examined. The prejudicial effect of this misconduct was accentuated by the court, which not only failed sternly to admonish the prosecutor but justified it, indulging at times in mild suggestions to the prosecutor to desist. Other prejudicial remarks and conduct of the prosecutor need not be enumerated as it is assumed that there will not be a recurrence thereof at the new trial. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1792 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1792

   To amend title 37, United States Code, to alleviate delay in the 
   payment of the Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus to members of 
                  Selected Reserve who are mobilized.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2003

  Mrs. Davis of California (for herself, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Buyer, and Mr. 
    Taylor of Mississippi) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 37, United States Code, to alleviate delay in the 
   payment of the Selected Reserve reenlistment bonus to members of 
                  Selected Reserve who are mobilized.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF SELECTED RESERVE REENLISTMENT BONUS TO MEMBERS OF 
              SELECTED RESERVE WHO ARE MOBILIZED.

    Section 308b of title 37, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (d), (e), and (f) as 
        subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
        subsection (d):
    ``(d) Payment to Mobilized Members.--In the case of a member 
entitled to a bonus under this section who is called or ordered to 
active duty, any amount of such bonus that is payable to the member 
during the period of active duty of the member shall be paid the member 
during that period of active duty, notwithstanding the service of the 
member on active duty pursuant to such call or order to active duty.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 842.109 Continuation of coverage for former Federal employees of the Civilian Marksmanship Program. ( a ) A Federal employee who was covered under FERS; ( 1 ) Was employed by the Department of Defense to support the Civilian Marksmanship Program as of the day before the date of the transfer of the Program to the Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety; and
( 2 ) Was offered and accepted employment by the Corporation as part of the transition described in section 1612(d) of Public Law 104-106, 110 Stat. 517—remains covered by FERS during continuous employment with the Corporation unless the individual files an election under paragraph (c) of this section. Such a covered individual is treated as if he or she were a Federal employee for purposes of this part, and of any other part within this title relating to FERS. The individual is entitled to the benefits of, and is subject to all conditions under, FERS on the same basis as if the individual were an employee of the Federal Government.
( b ) Cessation of employment with the Corporation for any period terminates eligibility for coverage under FERS during any subsequent employment by the Corporation.
( c ) An individual described by paragraph (a) of this section may at any time file an election to terminate continued coverage under the Federal benefits described in § 1622(a) of Public Law 104-106, 110 Stat. 521. Such an election must be in writing and filed with the Corporation. It takes effect immediately when received by the Corporation. The election applies to any and all Federal benefits described by section 1622(a) of Public Law 104-106, 110 Stat. 521, and is irrevocable. The Corporation must transmit the election to OPM with the individual's retirement records.
( d ) The Corporation must withhold from the pay of an individual described by paragraph (a) of this section an amount equal to the percentage withheld from the pay of a Federal employee for periods of service covered by FERS and, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund the amounts deducted from the individual's pay.
( e ) The Corporation must, in accordance with procedures established by OPM, pay into the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund amounts equal to any agency contributions required under FERS.
[74 FR 66566, Dec. 16, 2009]