alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-047 April 5, 2006

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

FROM PROPOSED GRAND GULF EARLY SITE PERMIT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final environmental impact statement

(EIS) on the proposed Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Grand Gulf site, about 25 miles south of

Vicksburg, Miss. The report contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that

would prevent issuing the ESP.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The Grand

Gulf ESP application was filed Oct. 21, 2003, by System Energy Resources Inc. (SERI), a subsidiary of

Entergy Nuclear. If approved, the permit would give SERI up to 20 years to decide whether to build a

new nuclear unit on the site and to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

The NRC staff’s conclusion is based on its independent review of a report submitted by SERI,

taking into account consultations with federal, state, tribal and local organizations and consideration of

comments received during the public scoping process. The staff’s conclusions include a finding that

there are no environmentally preferable or obviously superior sites.

The final EIS and related documents are available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. They are also available on the

NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1817/index.html . In

addition, the Harriette Person Memorial Library, located at 606 Main St., Port Gibson, Miss., will have

a copy of the EIS available for public inspection.

Before the Commission can reach a final decision on issuing the permit, the NRC staff must

complete revisions to the ESP’s safety evaluation report (SER). The Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board Panel must also conduct a mandatory hearing on the matter. The staff expects to issue the

revised portion of the SER shortly, and it will be available on the agency’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/esp/grand-gulf.html#safetyeval . The NRC expects to finish

the entire review process early in 2007.

###
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy Halterman, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Leroy Halterman


Leroy Halterman


President and Secretary


Principal Executive Officer







Date: March 16, 2011
§ 575.510 What requirements are associated with service agreements? ( a ) Before paying an extended assignment incentive, the agency must require the employee to sign a written service agreement to complete a specified period of employment with the agency in a particular territory, possession, or commonwealth. The service period must meet the following conditions: ( 1 ) The service period must begin on the first day of a pay period and end on the last day of a pay period; and
( 2 ) The service period must not cause an employee to exceed the 5-year lifetime limitation described in § 575.508.
( b ) In addition to the service requirement in paragraph (a) of this section, the service agreement may specify other terms and conditions of employment applicable to the employee. For example, the service agreement may specify the employee's work schedule, type of position, and performance level. In addition, the service agreement may address the extent to which periods of time on a detail, in a nonpay status, or in a paid leave status are creditable towards the completion of the service period.
( c ) The service agreement must specify the method of payment of an extended assignment agreement. The agency may choose to pay an extended assignment incentive in an initial lump-sum payment at the beginning of the service period, in installments at the end of specified periods throughout the service period (biweekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.), in a lump-sum payment at the end of the entire service period, or through a combination of payment methods.
( d ) The service agreement must include the conditions under which the employee would be required to repay an extended assignment incentive under § 575.513.
( e ) The service agreement must specify the conditions under which the payment of an extended assignment incentive may be terminated by the agency under § 575.512.
( f ) The service agreement must specify the conditions under which the agency may be obligated to pay an additional incentive payment for partially completed service, as provided in § 575.513(d).
( g ) The service agreement must specify the conditions under which the agency may impose a repayment penalty under § 575.513(e) for an employee who fails to fulfill the terms of the service agreement.
( h ) The service agreement must specify the conditions under which the agency may be obligated to pay an incentive payment attributable to some or all of the employee's *uncompleted* service for employees covered by § 575.511 or § 575.512.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         MANION MCDONOUGH & LUCAS, P.C.
                                ATTORNEYS AT LAW

600 GRANT STREET                                                     TELEPHONE
SUITE 882                                                         (412) 232-0200
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15219-2702                                  ---------
                                                                     TELECOPIER
                                                                  (412) 232-0206

                                August 14, 2000

VIA FAX AND U.S. MAIL
---------------------

James R. Martin, CFO
Northstar Health Services, Inc.
The Atrium
665 Philadelphia Street
Indiana, PA 15701

          Re:  Northstar Health Services, Inc.
               -------------------------------

Dear Jim:

          In accordance with your request of July 28, 2000, I previously
forwarded to you a copy of our opinion letter of March 23, 1998 concerning the
claim of James P. Shields against Northstar Health Services, Inc. and related
companies ("Northstar").

          As we discussed today, Northstar has our consent to disclose our firm
name and our opinion on the Shields' claim in Note 9 to Northstar's amended
Form 10-K filing for December 31, 1999 and to use our opinion and consent as
exhibits to that filing.

                                             Very truly yours,

                                             MANION MCDONOUGH & LUCAS, P.C.

                                             By /s/ Paul A. Manion
                                                ------------------------
                                                Paul A. Manion

PAM/jp
Enclosure
### §604. Removal of snags, etc., from Mississippi River

For the purpose of removing snags, wrecks, and other obstructions in the Mississippi River, the Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from the junction with the Mississippi and Red Rivers down the Atchafalaya River as far down as Melville, Louisiana, the Secretary of the Army, upon the application of the Chief of Engineers, is authorized to draw his warrant or requisition from time to time upon the Secretary of the Treasury for such sums as may be necessary to do such work, not to exceed in the aggregate for each year the sum of $100,000.

(Aug. 11, 1888, ch. 860, §§1, 7, 25 Stat. 421, 424; Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 264, §3, 35 Stat. 817; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501; Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1076, §1(15), 68 Stat. 967.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1888, act Aug. 11, 1888, as affected by act Mar. 3, 1909.

Act Mar. 3, 1909, made the provisions of act Aug. 11, 1888, for the removal of snags applicable to "the Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from the junction with the Mississippi and Red Rivers down the Atchafalaya River as far as Melville, Louisiana."

Section 7 of act Aug. 11, 1888, provided for "securing the uninterrupted work of operating snag boats on the upper Mississippi River" as well as for the removal of snags. The provision for operating snag boats is set out as section 605 of this title.

The words "the sum of $100,000" are substituted for "the amounts appropriated in this act for such purposes." An appropriation of $100,000 for removal of snags is contained in section 1 of the act.

#### Amendments

1954—Act Aug. 30, 1954, repealed proviso requiring that an itemized statement of expenses incurred in the removal of snags, etc., as provided in this section, should accompany the annual report of the Chief of Engineers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Appropriations

Act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §2, 48 Stat. 1225, which was classified to section 725a of former Title 31, Money and Finance, repealed the permanent appropriation under the title "Removing obstructions in Mississippi, Atchafalaya, and Old Rivers (fiscal year) (8–961.58)" effective July 1, 1935, and provided that such portions of any Acts as make permanent appropriations to be expended under such account are amended so as to authorize, in lieu thereof, annual appropriations from the general fund of the Treasury in identical terms and in such amounts as now provided by the laws providing such permanent appropriations.
### §41501. Financial institutions fraud task forces

#### (a) Establishment

The Attorney General shall establish such financial institutions fraud task forces as the Attorney General deems appropriate to ensure that adequate resources are made available to investigate and prosecute crimes in or against financial institutions and to recover the proceeds of unlawful activities from persons who have committed fraud or have engaged in other criminal activity in or against the financial services industry.

#### (b) Supervision

The Attorney General shall determine how each task force shall be supervised and may provide for the supervision of any task force by the Special Counsel.

#### (c) Senior interagency group

#### (1) Establishment

The Attorney General shall establish a senior interagency group to assist in identifying the most significant financial institution fraud cases and in allocating investigative and prosecutorial resources where they are most needed.

#### (2) Membership

The senior interagency group shall be chaired by the Special Counsel and shall include senior officials from—

(A) the Department of Justice, including representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Advisory Committee of United States Attorneys, and other relevant entities;

(B) the Department of the Treasury;

(C) the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation;

(D) the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency;

(E) the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; and

(F) the National Credit Union Administration.

#### (3) Duties

This senior interagency group shall enhance interagency coordination and assist in accelerating the investigations and prosecution of financial institutions fraud.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2539, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4884; Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §359(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified in a note under section 509 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (c)(2)(C) to (H). Pub. L. 111–203, which directed the amendment of subsec. (c)(2) by striking out subpars. (C) and (D) and redesignating subpars. (E) to (H) as "(C) through (G), respectively", was executed by striking subpars. (C) and (D) and redesignating subpars. (E) to (H) as (C) to (F), respectively, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Former subpars. (C) and (D) related to the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Resolution Trust Corporation, respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the transfer date, see section 351 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 906 of Title 2, The Congress.
### **CHAPTER 415—RESOURCE CENTERS, TASK FORCES, DATABASES, AND PROGRAMS**

Sec.
41501.
Financial institutions fraud task forces.
41502.
Morgan P. Hardiman Child Abduction and Serial Murder Investigative Resources Center.
41503.
Fugitive Apprehension Task Forces.
41504.
Project Safe Neighborhoods.
41505.
Organized retail theft database.
41506.
United States-Mexico Border Violence Task Force.
41507.
National Gang Intelligence Center.
41508.
Grants to States for threat assessment databases.
§ 1304.4604 Definitions. ( a ) *Government Employee* includes any officer or employee of the Executive Branch, those appointed or detailed under 5 U.S.C. 3374, and Special Government Employees. It does not include an individual performing services for the United States as an independent contractor under a personal service contract.
( b ) *Former Government Employee* means one who was, and no longer is, a Government employee.
( c ) *Special Government Employee* means an officer or employee of an agency who is retained, designated, appointed, or employed to perform temporary duties on a full-time or intermittent basis for not more than 130 days during any period of 365 consecutive days. This applies whether the Special Government Employee is compensated or not.
( d ) *Senior Employee* means an employee or officer as designated in the statute or by the Director of the Office of Government Ethics. The Director of the Office of Government Ethics has designated civilians who have significant decision-making or supervisory responsibility and are paid at or equivalent to GS-17 or above as Senior Employees. Civilians paid at the Executive level are automatically designated by statute as Senior Employees. (A list of Senior Employee positions is found at 5 CFR 737.33.)
### §519. Noncompliance with orders; penalties; removal of bridge

Any bridge owner who shall willfully fail or refuse to comply with any lawful order of the Secretary, made in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall be punished in any court of competent jurisdiction by a fine not exceeding $5,000, and every month such bridge owner shall remain in default shall be deemed a new offense and subject such bridge owner to additional penalties therefor. In addition to the penalties above prescribed the Secretary may, upon the failure or refusal of any bridge owner to comply with any lawful order issued by the Secretary in regard thereto, cause the removal of any such bridge and accessory works at the expense of the bridge owner; and suit for such expense may be brought in the name of the United States against such bridge owner and recovery had for such expense in any court of competent jurisdiction. The removal of any bridge erected or maintained in violation of the provisions of this subchapter or the order or direction of the Secretary made in pursuance thereof, and compliance with any order of the Secretary made with respect to any bridge in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, may be enforced by injunction, mandamus, or other summary process upon application to the district court of any district in which such bridge may, in whole or in part, exist, and proper proceedings to this end may be instituted under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States at the request of the Secretary.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §9, 54 Stat. 500.)
I^COmPaS S - o-.rMTn - compas s Airiines,LL C

^sJj ^ 'AHhT M iiHlMENTO r750 0 Airlin e Drive , suit e 13 0

Airline s •.^-JvSPOPWIOi ! IVIinneapolis , M N 5545 0 •"'f,h ^ npPRAJjOi-i S compassairline.co m 612.713.689 1 August2,201 1 .. . . . _ q ^ , . ^ 3

VI ACERTIFIE D MAI U RETUR N RECEIP TREQUESTE D U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n Docke tManagemen tSyste m 40 0 7* ^ Street , SW , Plaz a 40 1 Washington , D C 20591-000 1 Re : Compas s Airline s Reques tfo rExtensio n o fO E Exemptio n No . 949 6 Docke tID : FAA-2007-2896 7 Dea rSi ro rMadam : Thi s lette ri s t o reques ta two-yea rextensio n o fExemptio n No . 949 6 date d Apri l 200 9 whic h i s se tt o expir e i n Septembe r2011 . I n Exemptio n No . 9496 , Compas s Airlines , LL C wa s grante d a n exemptio n fro m 1 4 CF R § 121.434(c)(1)(ii ) t o th e exten t necessar yt o substitut e a qualifie d an d authorize d chec k airma n o raircre wprogra m designe e fo ra n FA A inspecto rt o observ e a qualifyin g PI C wh o i s completin g initia l o rupgrad e trainin g specifie d i n §121.42 4 durin g a tleas ton e fligh tle g tha tinclude s a takeoffan d a landing , subjectt o th e condition s an d limitation s describe d therein . Sinc e th e tim e o fth e exemption . Compas s ha s abide d byth e condition s an d limitation s describe d therei n an d th e exemptio n ha s not previousl ybee n supersede d o rrescinded . A n extensio n o fth e exemptio n i s necessar yt o Compass' s operation . An ylaps e o fth e extensio n wil l resul ti n significan tdelays i n Compass ' pilo ttrainin g progra m whic h wil l resul ti n staffin g issue s whic h wil l affectCompass ' entir e operation . Further , Compas s doe s no tsee k t o chang e th e condition s an d limitation s o fth e curren texemptio n whic h wa s originall ygrante d i n Septembe ro f200 7 an d extende d i n Apri l o f2009 . Thi s exemptio n ha s bee n i n us e fo rfou ryears wit h n o know n compromis e o fsafety . Th e renewa l o fthi s exemptio n i s no ta controversia l issue . Th e existenc e o fth e exemptio n i s wel l know n an d widel yaccepted . Fo rthi s reason , an d th e reason s state d above . Compas s request s tha ta findin g o fgoo d caus e b e mad e waivin g publicatio n i n th e Federa l Registe r (1 4 CF R §11.87) . Than k yo u fo ryou rconsideratio n o fou rreques to fthi s exemption . I fyo u require an y furthe rinformatio n pleas e cal l m e at612-713-6891 .Page 2 Augus t2 , 201 1 Sincerely , 

# OcuTVi ^ nv. \xhjJ^i^( L Jame s M . Whit e Directo ro fOperation s Compas s Airlines , LL C 750 0 Airlin e Drive , Suit e 13 0 Minneapolis , M N 5545 0 

### (612)713-689 1 mike.white@compassairlines.co m cc : Mr . Dougla s Lundgre n Principa l Operation s Inspector , Federa l Aviatio n Administration , FSDO-EA27-IA D
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Intent To Grant an Exclusive License for a U.S. Army Owned 
Invention to Distributed Control Factory Corporation of Pearl River, LA

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces that, unless there is 
objection, it will grant an exclusive license to Distributed Control 
Factory Corporation of Pearl River, Louisiana, on U.S. Patent 
Application Serial No. 10/064,542, entitled ``System and Method for 
Model Based Control'', filed July 25, 2002, and on Patent Cooperation 
Treaty Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US03/23,540, entitled ``System 
and Method for Model Based Control'', filed July 25, 2003. Any license 
granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404.

DATES: File written objections by February 20, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Beam, Legal Office, AMSRD-
AAR-GC, U.S. Army ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000, (973) 724-
3411.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Anyone wishing to object to the granting of 
this license has 15 days from the date of this notice to file written 
objections along with supporting evidence, if any.

Luz D. Ortiz,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-2496 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
U.S. Geological SurveyFact Sheet 094-01

# Monitoring for Pesticides in Ground Water in Nevada, 2001

*By* Nyle Pennington, Patricia A. Adams, Charles W. Moses1, Hugh E. Bevans, JonCarpenter1, and Scott Cichowlaz1

1Nevada Department of Agriculture, Reno, Nevada

**Report availability**: Web (HTML) and Portable Document Format (PDF).

  The HTMLversion of the report can be viewed in your web browser.

  The PDFversion of the report (1,379 Kb) displays high-resolution, printable pages. You must have the free **Adobe AcrobatReader** installed on your computer to view this document (download Acrobat Reader).

**Document Accessibility:** Adobe Systems Incorporated has information about PDFs and the visuallyimpaired. This information provides tools to help make PDF files accessible. These tools convert Adobe PDF documentsinto HTML or ASCII text, which then can be read by a number of common screen-reading programs that synthesize text asaudible speech. In addition, an accessible version of Acrobat Reader 5.0 for Windows (English only), which containssupport for screen readers, is available. These tools and the accessible reader may be obtained free from Adobe at Adobe Access.

Send questions or comments about this report to the NevadaDistrict Web Team.

For more information about USGS activities in Nevada, visit the USGS NevadaDistrict home page.

----
§ 831.1404 Financial hardship. Financial hardship may be deemed to exist in—but not limited to—those situations where the annuitant from whom collection is sought needs substantially all of his/her current income and liquid assets to meet current ordinary and necessary living expenses and liabilities. ( a ) *Considerations.* Some pertinent considerations in determining whether recovery would cause financial hardship are as follows: ( 1 ) The individual's financial ability to pay *at the time collection is scheduled to be made.*
( 2 ) Income to other family member(s), if such member's ordinary and necessary living expenses are included in expenses reported by the annuitant.
( b ) *Exemptions.* Assets exempt from execution under State law should not be considered in determining an individual's ability to repay the indebtedness, rather primary emphasis shall be placed upon the annuitant's liquid assets and current income in making such determinations.