alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED OCTOBER 21, 2011 

.>ePARTiV!EMT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONJSPORTAllON 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -K^C^^^A OPERA! 10N3 

WASHINGTON, DC ,-.0. 0 

?Otl GCl 2 1 P 2- \ 2 

In The Matter Of: 

DRYTAC 

CORPORATION 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0480 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On October 19, 2011 the Respondent, Drytac Corporation (Drytac), filed a Letter 

of Withdrawal of Complaint with the Office of Hearings. The Letter of Withdrawal of 

Complaint requested a cancellation of the October 26, 2011 Litigation Scheduling 

Conference and an order dismissing the proceedings pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The October 20, 2011 Litigation Scheduling Conference scheduled for 

10:00am Eastern Standard Time is cancelled. 

2) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

istrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMS NO. FAA-20H-0480 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

AMENDED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Meredith L. Voder, Respondent's Counsel 

Parker, Pollard, Wilton & Peaden, P.C. 

6802 Paragon Place, Suite 300 

Richmond, VA 23230-1655 

TEL: 804-262-3600 

FAX: 804-262-3284 

Tim Rader, Vice-Prcsidenl/Financc 

Drytac Corporation, Respondent 

5383 Glen Alden Drive 

Richmond-VA 23231 

TEL: • 804-222-3094 

FAX: 804-226-2330 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of TranspoTtatiorT 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by e.xpedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-087 June 29, 2006

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET JULY 12-14 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

will hold a public meeting July 12-14 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the final review

of the license renewal application for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, near Oswego,

N.Y. The committee will also be briefed on study results related to establishing limits for phosphate

ion concentration in groundwater at plants seeking license renewal, and on a proposed framework for

integrating risk and safety margins.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and end at 6:45 p.m. on Wednesday, 7 p.m.

on Thursday and 12:30 p.m. on Friday. A portion of Thursday morning’s meeting will be closed for a

discussion on safeguards and security matters. A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2006/ . 

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting should

contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. To pursue videoconferencing services, contact Theron

Brown, at 301-415-8066.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants and

related safety issues.

# # #
B.C.D. 03-45

MAY 2 2 2003

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC

N&T Railway Company, LLC

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continued status of Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC (NT-LLC), BA.

No. 2273, and the current status of N&T Railway Company LLC

(N&TRC) as employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§ 231 et seep) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. § 351 et seep) (RUIA).

Effective January 1, 2003, N&T RC began rail operations as a result of

its acquisition of all rail line operations, including the transfer of all

employees, of NT-LLC. NT-LLC ceased operations as of the close of

business on December 31, 2002. Surface Transportation Board (STB)

authority regarding this acquisition is set forth in STB Finance Docket

No. 34243, decided January 8, 2003.

Section 202.11 (20 CFR 202.11) of the Board’s regulations states that:

The employer status of any company or person shall

terminate whenever such company or person loses any of the

characteristics essential to the existence of an employer

status.

Also, section 1(a)(1) of the RRA defines the term “employer” to include:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle IV of

Title 49 [45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(l)(i)].

*****

Section 1 of the RUIA contains the same definition.

.1

BA#2273
-2-

Nimishillen & Tuscarawas, LLC

N&T Railway Company, LLC

The information summarized above indicates that NT-LLC no longer

possesses the characteristics of an operating railroad company. The 

Board, therefore, finds that effective with the close of business on

December 31, 2002, the date on which it last operated, Nimishillen &

Tuscarawas, LLC ceased to be a covered employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act.

Additionally, the Board finds that N&T Railway Company, LLC became

a covered rail carrier employer under the Railroad Retirement Act and

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act on January 1, 2003, the date

on which it began operations. Lastly, the Board finds that N&TRC is

the successor employer of the former NT-LLC for purposes of experience

rating under the RUIA. See 20 CFR § 345.203.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
# L_2017189EN.01005001.xml

| 20.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 189/50

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 31/2016

of 5 February 2016

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1314]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1480 of 28 August 2015 amending several annexes to Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules concerning reference methods, data validation and location of sampling points for the assessment of ambient air quality (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1480 of 28 August 2015 amending several annexes to Directives 2004/107/EC and 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules concerning reference methods, data validation and location of sampling points for the assessment of ambient air quality (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in points 14c (Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) and 21ak (Directive 2004/107/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 L 1480: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1480 of 28 August 2015 (OJ L 226, 29.8.2015, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 L 1480: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/1480 of 28 August 2015 (OJ L 226, 29.8.2015, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/1480 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 February 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 226, 29.8.2015, p. 4.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
No. II-08-054 December 3, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404) 562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Roger Hannah (404) 562-4417 

 Joey Ledford (404) 562-4487 

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH TVA OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS CONSTRUCTION 

AND LICENSING OF WATTS BAR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 2 

 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority 

officials from 7-9 p.m. on Thursday, Dec. 11 at Roane State Community College to discuss 

issues relating to construction and licensing of the unfinished Watts Bar nuclear plant’s Unit 2 

near Spring City, Tenn. 

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Roane State’s O’Bryan 

Building, Classroom # 0101, at 276 Patterson Lane in Harriman, Tenn. NRC officials will be 

available to answer questions from the public after the business portion of the meeting. 

The NRC extended the construction permit for Unit 2 earlier this year. TVA suspended 

construction of the unit in 1985, but decided in August 2007 to complete the project. The unit’s 

Westinghouse-designed 1,100 MWe pressurized water reactor is scheduled for completion in 

2013. TVA has been operating Unit 1 at the site since 1996. 

Copies of the meeting agenda and related documents will be made available 

electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room in Washington, D.C., 

and from the NRC document system (ADAMS), which is accessible from the NRC Web site at 

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 3, 2019

b0702 

# Order

Clerk July 3, 2019

159645

In re P. B. CAMPBELL, Minor. SC: 159645

COA: 344885

Wayne CC Family Div:

16

- 523689

- NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded th at the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 016

Attachment Name

CAS RN 1456802-89-3 Summary of Molecular Weight Distributions and Percent Monomer Composition

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. (Chem 4)

Contains CBI

Report Number

 Sanitized Version
All CBI has been removed
115 STAT. 260 PUBLIC LAW 107–47—OCT. 5, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2510:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107–173 (Comm. on Financial Services).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Sept. 5, considered and passed House.

Sept. 21, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Sept. 25, House concurred in Senate amendment with amendments.

Sept. 26, Senate concurred in House amendments.

Æ

Public Law 107–47

107th Congress

An Act

To extend the expiration date of the Defense Production Act of 1950, and for

other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense Production Act Amendments of 2001’’.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT OF 1950.

Section 717(a) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.

App. 2166(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2001’’ and

inserting ‘‘September 30, 2003’’.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Section 711(b) of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C.

App. 2161(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2001’’ and inserting ‘‘2003’’.

SEC. 4. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

The Defense Production Act of 1950 is amended as follows:

(1) In section 301(a)(1) (50 U.S.C. App. 2091(a)(1)), by

striking ‘‘714(a)(1) of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘702(16)’’.

(2) In subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of section 301(e)(1)

(50 U.S.C. App. 2091(e)(1)), by striking ‘‘industrial resource

shortfall’’ each place such term appears and inserting ‘‘industrial resource or critical technology item shortfall’’.

(3) In sections 301(e)(1)(D)(ii) and 303(a)(7)(B) (50 U.S.C.

App. 2091(e)(1)(D)(ii), 2093(a)(7)(B)), by inserting ‘‘item’’ after

‘‘critical technology’’.

(4) In section 304(b)(1), (50 U.S.C. App. 2094(b)(1)), by

striking ‘‘711(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘711(b)’’.

(5) In sections 301(e)(2)(B) and 309(a)(1), (50 U.S.C. App.

2091(e)(2)(B), 2099(a)(1)), by striking ‘‘Committee on Banking,

Finance and Urban Affairs of the House of Representatives’’

and inserting ‘‘Committee on Financial Services of the House

of Representatives’’.

Approved October 5, 2001.

Defense

Production Act

Amendments of

2001.

50 USC app.

2061 note.

Oct. 5, 2001

[H.R. 2510]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 

No: II-08-019 April 9, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2007 PERFORMANCE OF 

SURRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, 

April 15, with representatives of Dominion Energy to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety 

performance during 2007 at the Surry nuclear power plant, operated by the company near Surry, 

Va. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 1:30 p.m. in the 

Surry Government Center, Surry County Extension Conference Room, 45 School Street, Surry, 

Va. 

After the formal presentation, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the 

public on the safety performance of Surry, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe plant 

operation. 

“The NRC continually inspects and reviews the performance of Surry and all commercial 

nuclear plants, issuing inspection reports throughout the year and an overall assessment at year’s 

end,” NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree said. “This meeting is an opportunity to 

discuss our assessment with the company, local officials and people living near the plant, and to 

answer any questions they may have.” 

The NRC said the Surry plant operated safely during the 2007 assessment period, from 

Jan. 1 through Dec. 31. All inspection findings for Units 1 and 2 were “green” and of very low 

safety significance, and all performance indicators showed the plant operating at a level that does 

not require additional NRC oversight. Therefore, the NRC will be conducting only its regular, 

baseline inspections at the plant during 2008. 

When assessing nuclear plant performance, the NRC uses color-coded performance 

indicators and inspection findings. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” 

“yellow” or “red” based on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2007 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/sur_2007q4.pdf . 
Current performance information for the two units at Surry plant is available on the NRC 

web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUR1/sur1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUR2/sur2_chart.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §§854b, 854c. Repealed. June 3, 1948, ch. 390, §22(a), formerly §21(a), 62 Stat. 300; renumbered §22(a), Sept. 14, 1961, Pub. L. 87–233, §1(f), 75 Stat. 506

Section 854b, act Jan. 19, 1942, ch. 6, §3, 56 Stat. 7, related to composition, powers and duties of a Personnel Board.

Section 854c, act Jan. 19, 1942, ch. 6, §4, 56 Stat. 7, related to submission of reports of the Personnel Boards to the President.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the People of the State of New York, by George S. Van Schaick, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, for an Order to Take Possession of the Property of and Rehabilitate the Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company. In the Matter of a Plan of Readjustment of the Rights of the Holders of Investments in a Mortgage Covering Premises 405 Broadway, City of Long Beach, Guaranteed by Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company. (Guarantee No. 180,531.) Rosa B. Hirsh, Appellant; Manufacturers Trust Company, as Trustee, et al., Respondents.

Appeal by claimant from an order, entered in reorganization proceedings on a final accounting by a trustee of a certificated mortgage, insofar as it rejected her claim for an alleged deficiency under a chattel mortgage. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent Manufacturers Trust Company. The pertinent statutes do not require a trial of such a claim in such a proceeding. The rejection of the claim for the alleged deficiency under the chattel mortgage relegated the claimant to an action to enforce the alleged deficiency. In such an action the mortgagor would be afforded an opportunity to contest the claim in whole or part *(Consumers Brewing Go.*v. *Braun,*147 App. Div. 171; *Willcox*v. *Perez,*115 App. Div. 693; *Hyer*v. *Sutton,*59 Hun 40; *Harrison*v. *Hall,*239 Y. Y. 51, 53; 2 Jones, Chattel Mortgages and Conditional Sales, § 711; *Cottone*v. *Spivach,*159 Y. Y. S. 241 [not officially published]; *Gase*v. *Boughton,*11 Wend. 106), where the alleged sale, upon which the alleged deficiency is based, was not made in the course of an action to foreclose the mortgage. Here the alleged sale was made pursuant to the terms of the chattel mortgage. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
### §30105. Additional funding for resources to investigate and prosecute intellectual property crimes and other criminal activity involving computers

#### (a) Additional funding for resources

#### (1) Authorization

In addition to amounts otherwise authorized for resources to investigate and prosecute intellectual property crimes and other criminal activity involving computers, there are authorized to be appropriated for each of the fiscal years 2009 through 2013—

(A) $10,000,000 to the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and

(B) $10,000,000 to the Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice.

#### (2) Availability

Any amounts appropriated under paragraph (1) shall remain available until expended.

#### (b) Use of additional funding

Funds made available under subsection (a) shall be used by the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Attorney General, for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, respectively, to—

(1) hire and train law enforcement officers to—

(A) investigate intellectual property crimes and other crimes committed through the use of computers and other information technology, including through the use of the Internet; and

(B) assist in the prosecution of such crimes; and

(2) enable relevant units of the Department of Justice, including units responsible for investigating computer hacking or intellectual property crimes, to procure advanced tools of forensic science and expert computer forensic assistance, including from non-governmental entities, to investigate, prosecute, and study such crimes.

(Pub. L. 110–403, title IV, §403, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4273.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3713c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2517

_____________________________

SAFE HARBOR RECOVERY, LLC,

and ASCENDANT COMMERCIAL 

INS. INC.

Appellants,

v.

RICHARD LANGWEIL,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Gregory J. Johnsen, Judge.

Date of Accident: March 1, 2016.

January 12, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., Tallahassee,

for Appellants.

Jeffrey M. Friedman of Vassallo, Bilotta, Friedman & Davis, West 

Palm Beach, for Appellee.
### §21117. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter—

(1) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2009;

(2) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2010;

(3) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2011;

(4) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2012;

(5) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2013 1

(6) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2014;

(7) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2015;

(8) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2016;

(9) $60,000,000 for fiscal year 2017; and

(10) $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2024.

#### (b) Availability

Funds appropriated under subsection (a) shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 110–401, title I, §107, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4241; Pub. L. 112–206, §7, Dec. 7, 2012, 126 Stat. 1493; Pub. L. 115–82, §2, Nov. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 1266; Pub. L. 117–262, §2, Dec. 21, 2022, 136 Stat. 2394.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 17617 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a)(10). Pub. L. 117–262 substituted "2024" for "2022".

2017—Subsec. (a)(10). Pub. L. 115–82 substituted "each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022" for "fiscal year 2018".

2012—Subsec. (a)(6) to (10). Pub. L. 112–206 added pars. (6) to (10).

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a semicolon.