alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Laplant v. Pallito , No. 240

- 4

- 14 Wncv (Teachout, J., February 4, 2015)

[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the

accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion data base is not guaranteed.]

STATE OF VERMONT

SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION

Washington Unit Docket No. 240

- 4

- 14 Wncv

TRAVIS LAPLANT

Petitioner

v.

ANDREW PALLITO, COMMISSIONER

, Vermont Department of Corrections

Defendant

DECISION

The DOC’s Motion to Dismiss

Petitioner Travis LaPlant, an inmate in the custody of the Vermont Department of

Corrections (DOC), seeks Rule 75 review of the DOC’s decision to not give him a work camp

placement, which would enable him to earn work camp good time. He characterizes the DOC’ s

refusal a s a violation of his due process rights, his rights under Vermont’s Common Benefits

Clause, and as an abuse of discretion. He seeks placement in work camp and an award of good

time dating back to when he believes his eligibility began. The DOC has filed a motion to

dismiss.

Mr. LaPlant alleges that he was “ case staffed ” to participate in work camp but then that

decision was reversed internally

. E

- mails produced by the DOC at his request , and appended to

his original complaint, brought to his attention that the decision against work camp was

motivated by the existence of a prior DR and perceptions about his propensity toward violence

and escape.

All of Mr. LaPlant’s claims are predicated on his belief that he has som e entitlement to

participate in work camp. The statutes that address work camp, principally 28 V.S.A. § § 811

and 817, do not entitle any inmate to a work camp placement and no statute, rule, policy, or

directive limits the DOC’ s discretion to determine whether or not to p lace a particular inmate in

work camp. Th ere is no right to work camp or to review of a decision against work camp

.

Mr. LaPlant thus has not identified any ministerial duty that might entitle him to relief in

the nature of mandamus, or any quasi

- judicia l decision that might entitle him to relief in the

nature of certio ra ri, as contemplated by Rule 75

. See Inman v. Pallito , 2013 VT 94, ¶¶ 10

– 18,

195 Vt. 218 (explaining that the DOC’s broad discretion over an inmate’s programming

requirements is not revie wable)

. He similarly has not identified any liberty interest that might

give rise to due process rights, and has not meaningfully described any Common Benefits

violation.2 ORDER

For the foregoing reasons, the DOC’s motion to dismiss is granted

.

Dated at Montpelier, Vermont this ____ day of February, 201 5

.

_____________________________ Mary Miles Teachout

Superior Judge
BA # 9023

BCD 2016-16

(Issued 07/26/2016)

Name changed from

Hilco SP Rail, LLC

to

Sparrows Point Rail, LLC

No decision published.
§ 831.1606 Requests from individuals. ( a ) An employee who requests credit for service under 5 U.S.C. 8336(c) bears the burden of proof with respect to that service, and must provide the employing agency with all pertinent information regarding duties performed.
( b ) An employee who is currently serving in a position that has not been approved as a primary or secondary position, but who believes that his or her service is creditable as service in a primary or secondary position may request the agency head to determine whether or not the employee's current service should be credited and, if it qualifies, whether it should be credited as service in a primary or secondary position. A written request for current service must be made within 6 months after entering the position or after any significant change in the position.
( c ) A current or former employee (or the survivor of a former employee) who believes that a period of past service in an unapproved position qualifies as service in a primary or secondary position and meets the conditions for credit may request the agency head to determine whether or not the employee's past service should be credited and, if it qualifies, whether it should be credited as service in a primary or secondary position. A written request for past service must be made no later than June 30, 2012.
( d ) The agency head may extend the time limit for filing under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section when, in the judgment of such agency head, the individual shows that he or she was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from making the request within the time limit.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William G. Forhan,
President  and  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and

2)   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  Report.

Date: May 17, 2004

                                             /s/  William G. Forhan
                                             ----------------------
                                             William G. Forhan, President and
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Hope, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18, U.S.C. Section 1350,
as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and

2)   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  Report.

Date: May 17, 2004


                                             /s/  David Scott
                                             ----------------------
                                             David Scott
                                             Chief Financial Officer
No. IV-08-038 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 September 16, 2008 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON 

SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ISSUES

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Southern California 

Edison Co. officials on Sept. 23 to discuss the status of performance improvements and other 

issues at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. SCE operates the plant, located near San 

Clemente, Calif. 

 The meeting, which will be open to public observation, will begin at 6:30 p.m. at the 

Holiday Inn San Clemente Resort, 111 S. De La Estrella, San Clemente. 

 SCE officials will brief the NRC staff on actions taken to address deficiencies in the areas 

of human performance, and problem identification and resolution. SCE will also discuss the 

status of actions taken in response to a Confirmatory Order issued by the NRC last January in 

response to willful violations of NRC regulations. 

 The public will have an opportunity to observe the meeting and ask questions. A phone 

bridge is also being established to permit interested members of the public to listen to the 

meeting. People interested should contact Don Allen at (817) 276-6574 or via e-mail at: 

Don.Allen@nrc.gov for details. 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
Board Coverage Decision 

2010-44

American Federation of Railroad Police, Inc.

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 7264
### §10123. Authority for 100 per centum grants

A grant authorized under this subchapter may be up to 100 per centum of the total cost of each project for which such grant is made. The Institute shall require, whenever feasible, as a condition of approval of a grant under this subchapter, that the recipient contribute money, facilities, or services to carry out the purposes for which the grant is sought.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §203, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1174.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3723 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 203 of Pub. L. 90–351, title I, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 199; Pub. L. 91–644, title I, §3(a)–(c), Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1881; Pub. L. 93–83, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 198; Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §542, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1142; Pub. L. 94–503, title I, §105, Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2408; Pub. L. 95–115, §9(b), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1061, provided for establishment of State planning agencies, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–157.
### §864a. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section, act May 18, 1920, ch. 190, §§11 (proviso), 14, 41 Stat. 604, related to service credits in computing longevity pay of officers of the Coast and Geodetic Survey.
```

[Federal Register: February 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 34)]
[Notices]               
[Page 7568]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22fe10-27]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday March 12, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-3522 Filed 2-18-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
August 14, 2015

Mr. Ryan Casey

CEO

Skyward Film, Inc.

88 Belgium Street

Cranston, RI 02920

Dear Mr. Casey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ § 45.23, 45.29, 61.113, 61.133, 91.9, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203, 91.401

– 91.

417, and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we

can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered exemption request on behalf of Skyward Film, Inc. into the public docket

(No. FAA− 20 15

− 1671 ) on May 14, 2015 , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 T he reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 1 1.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

I f you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
# L_2018142EN.01000101.xml

| 7.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 142/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 142/1

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 104/2017

of 13 June 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/799]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/45 of 14 January 2015 amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards innovative technologies for reducing CO2 emissions from light commercial vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/45 of 14 January 2015 amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as regards innovative technologies for reducing CO2 emissions from light commercial vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in points 45zu (Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008) and 45zx (Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 0045: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/45 of 14 January 2015 (OJ L 9, 15.1.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 0045: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/45 of 14 January 2015 (OJ L 9, 15.1.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/45 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 14 June 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 109/2017 of 16 June 2017 (2), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 111/2017 of 16 June 2017 (3), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 9, 15.1.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  See page 41 of this Official Journal.

2

(3)  See page 45 of this Official Journal.

3

---
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1882

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 440 South Orange Blossom

Trail in Orlando, Florida, as the ‘‘Arthur ‘Pappy’Kennedy Post Office’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1882

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 440 South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando,

Florida, as the ‘‘Arthur ‘Pappy’ Kennedy Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1882 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 440 South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando,

4 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Arthur

5 ‘Pappy’ Kennedy Post Office’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Arthur ‘Pappy’ Kennedy Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11178 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DEMETRIUS KENYON HALL, also known as Jack Frost, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-121-Y

- - - - - - - - - - October 10, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Demetrius Kenyon Hall has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Hall’s request for a copy of the record and an extension of time in which to identify nonfrivolous issues for appeal is DENIED.
§ 550.504 Other exceptions. ( a ) When a department, agency, or the government of the District of Columbia encounters difficulty in obtaining employees to perform required personal services because of section 5533(a) of title 5, United States Code, it may make an exception from that section upon determining that the required services cannot be readily obtained otherwise. The exception shall specify the position(s) to which it applies.
( b ) The Office of Personnel Management will publish exceptions of general application.
(5 U.S.C. 1104; Pub. L. 95-454, sec. 3(5))
[44 FR 54694, Sept. 21, 1979, as amended at 66 FR 66711, Dec. 27, 2001]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1971 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1971

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn-2 (Bolt-2).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

  Ms. Kaptur introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn-2 (Bolt-2).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOLTORN-2 (BOLT-2).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
      

``    9902.07.05    Dendritic         Free              Free              No change         On or before 12/
                     Polyester (CAS                                                          31/2006          ''
                     No. 326794-49-                                                                            .
                     4) (provided
                     for in
                     subheading
                     3907.99.00)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
From: Reeves, David

To: "Pettis, Mike"

Cc: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: RE: Owens Corning FG1 Data set follow-up

Date: Thursday, January 12, 2012 4:58:06 PM

Hi Mike. We went back and reviewed the FG1 value from the 2002 test and found that we made a

summing error on two of the runs and we agree with your value. We then went back and reviewed

our UPL analysis and determined that the end result would not change – however, with new data

and information from comments, the proposal calculations may or may not be relevant to the final

analysis.

Regards -

Dave Reeves

RTI International

dwreeves@rti.org

(919) 316-3739

From: Pettis, Mike [mailto:mike.pettis@owenscorning.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:22 PM

To: Reeves, David

Subject: RE: Owens Corning FG1 Data set follow-up

I am on the phone so could not take your call. If you give me a number I will call you when you I get off.

     Michael Pettis    740-328-2468   740-877-7087 (cell)

 Make the World a Better Place

 

_____________________________________________

From: Pettis, Mike 

Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:49 PM

To: 'dwreeves@rti.org'

Cc: 'Angus Crane'; 'Chris Pool'

Subject: Owens Corning FG1 Data set follow-up

Dave, Thanks for your time today.

As discussed on the call the Newark and Kansas City data sets reconcile but we were unable to do the FG1

particulate data reconciliation at the time of the call. Data from Nov 2002 was presented to us as being .0048,

.011, .011 (lbs/ton) for the three individual tests. When we look at the data set we get 0.0066 + 0.0113 lb/ton

for the first test, 0.0061 + 0.0173 lb/ton for the second usable test, and 0.0080 + 0.0187 lb/ton for the third

usable test. Resulting in test results being 0.0179, 0.0234, and 0.0267 lb/ton for the three tests resulting in an

average of 0.0227 lb/ton which is significantly different that the .0089 which was related to us in the call and was

used to calculate the MACT floor. I was unable to reconcile your results for that data. I would like to point out
that the second test of the series of both stacks was not utilized due to a failed leak check on one stack.

Without discarding the other stack test result at the same time the production data handling gets to be an

issue. Even so your results are about half of what we calculate from the same data set.

     Michael Pettis    740-328-2468   740-877-7087 (cell)

 Make the World a Better Place

 

The information contained in this communication and its attachment(s) is intended only for

the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and 

may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure. If the

reader of this message is not the intended recipient, 

you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this

communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this

communication in error, please notify postmaster@owenscorning.com and delete the

communication without retaining any copies. Thank you. 

Translations available: http://www.owenscorning.com/emailfooter.html