66178 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

(h) Related Information 

Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety 

Agency AD No. 2018–0217, dated October 

10, 2018, for related information. You may 

examine the MCAI on the internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov by searching for and 

locating Docket No. FAA–2018–1058. For 

service information related to this AD, 

contact PILATUS Aircraft Ltd., Customer 

Technical Support (MCC), P.O. Box 992, CH– 

6371 Stans, Switzerland; phone: +41 (0)41 

619 67 74; fax: +41 (0)41 619 67 73; email: 

techsupport@pilatus-aircraft.com; internet: 

http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com. You may 

review this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division, 901 

Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

December 17, 2018. 

Melvin J. Johnson, 

Aircraft Certification Service, Deputy 

Director, Policy and Innovation Division, 

AIR–601. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27899 Filed 12–21–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2018–1012; Product 

Identifier 2018–NM–132–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all The 

Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. 

This proposed AD was prompted by 

reports of uncommanded movements of 

the Captain’s and First Officer’s seats. 

This proposed AD would require an 

identification of the part number, and if 

applicable the serial number, of the 

Captain’s and First Officer’s seats, and 

do applicable on-condition actions for 

affected seats. This proposed AD would 

also require a one-time detailed 

inspection and repetitive checks of the 

horizontal movement system of the 

Captain’s and First Officer’s seats and 

applicable on-condition actions. This 

proposed AD would also provide an 

optional terminating action for the 

repetitive checks of the horizontal 

movement system. We are proposing 

this AD to address the unsafe condition 

on these products. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by February 11, 2019. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster 

Blvd., MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 

90740–5600; telephone 562–797–1717; 

internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this service information at the FAA, 

Transport Standards Branch, 2200 

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. 

It is also available on the internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching 

for and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 

1012. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 

1012; or in person at Docket Operations 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

The AD docket contains this NPRM, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for Docket Operations 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brandon Lucero, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental 

Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO 

Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des 

Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206– 

231–3569; email: Brandon.Lucero@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposal. Send your comments to 

an address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2018–1012; Product Identifier 2018– 

NM–132–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this NPRM. We will consider 

all comments received by the closing 

date and may amend this NPRM 

because of those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We have received reports indicating 

that there have been uncommanded 

movements of the Captain’s and First 

Officer’s seats. A Model 747 operator 

reported that during a takeoff, the First 

Officer’s seat unlocked from its seat 

tracks and moved aft. The First Officer 

was unable to control the airplane and 

the Captain took over the controls to 

avoid a rejected takeoff. The unlocking 

of the seat from the seat tracks was 

caused by actuator damage, which was 

a result of incorrect adjustment of the 

seat’s manual release lever cable, which 

allowed the clutch mechanism to only 

partially engage. Captain’s and First 

Officer’s seats having the same part 

numbers are installed on both Model 

747 and Model 777 airplanes. We are 

considering additional rulemaking to 

address the unsafe condition for Model 

747 airplanes. 

In addition, a Model 777 operator 

reported that the Captain’s seat could 

not be locked in position after an 

adjustment to the horizontal seat 

position in flight. The seat became 

unlocked from the track and moved 

freely forward and aft. Control was 

given to the First Officer for approach 

and landing. The results of an 

inspection revealed that the horizontal 

actuator output shaft had broken. When 

a horizontal actuator output shaft 

breaks, the pilot cannot prevent seat 

movement in a forward and aft direction 

and cannot lock the seat in position. A 

broken horizontal actuator output shaft 

is the result of high loads, that exceed 

the design limits, caused by a stalled 

motor that can occur due to high 

mechanical resistance to motion during 

powered operation of the seat. Foreign 

object debris (FOD) in the seat tracks is 

another condition that can result in a 

stalled motor and cause the horizontal 

actuator output shaft to break. 

An uncommanded seat movement 

during a critical part of a flight, such as 

takeoff or landing, could cause a flight 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 66179 

control obstruction or unintended flight 

control input, which could result in the 

loss of the ability to control the airplane. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

We reviewed Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 777–25– 

0607, Revision 1, dated July 17, 2018 

(‘‘BSASB 777–25–0607, Revision 1’’). 

The service information describes 

procedures for identification of the part 

number, and if applicable the serial 

number, of the Captain’s and First 

Officer’s seats, and for applicable oncondition actions for affected seats. The 

on-condition actions include an 

inspection of each seat’s fore/aft and 

vertical manual control levers for 

looseness, installation of serviceable 

seats, and a seat functional test after any 

cable adjustment. 

We also reviewed Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 777–25– 

0619, Revision 1, dated August 8, 2018 

(‘‘BSASB 777–25–0619, Revision 1’’). 

The service information describes 

procedures for a detailed inspection and 

repetitive checks of the horizontal 

movement system for the Captain’s and 

First Officer’s seats for findings (e.g., 

evidence of cracks, scores, corrosion, 

dents, deformation or visible wear; and 

incorrectly assembled microswitch 

assemblies, actuators, and limit 

switches), and applicable on-condition 

actions. The on-condition actions 

include clearing the seat tracks of FOD, 

overhaul of the horizontal movement 

system and replacement of the 

horizontal actuator. The service 

information also describes procedures 

for an optional terminating action for 

the repetitive checks by installing a 

serviceable Captain’s or First Officer’s 

seat. 

This service information is reasonably 

available because the interested parties 

have access to it through their normal 

course of business or by the means 

identified in the ADDRESSES section. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of the same 

type design. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

This proposed AD would require 

accomplishment of the actions 

identified in the Accomplishment 

Instructions of BSASB 777–25–0607, 

Revision 1, described previously, except 

as discussed under ‘‘Differences 

Between this Proposed AD and the 

Service Information,’’ and except for 

any differences identified as exceptions 

in the regulatory text of this proposed 

AD. 

This proposed AD would also require 

accomplishment of the actions 

identified as ‘‘RC’’ (required for 

compliance) in the Accomplishment 

Instructions of BSASB 777–25–0619, 

Revision 1, described previously, except 

as discussed under ‘‘Differences 

Between this Proposed AD and the 

Service Information,’’ and except for 

any differences identified as exceptions 

in the regulatory text of this proposed 

AD. 

For information on the procedures 

and compliance times, see this service 

information at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2018– 

1012. 

Differences Between This Proposed AD 

and the Service Information 

The effectivity of BSASB 777–25– 

0607, Revision 1; and BSASB 777–25– 

0619, Revision 1, is limited to Model 

777–200, –200LR, –300, –300ER, and 

777F airplanes with Ipeco part number 

series 3A201 and 3A258 Captain’s and 

First Officer’s powered seats installed, 

line numbers 1 and on. However, the 

applicability of this proposed AD 

includes all Model 777–200, –200LR, 

–300, –300ER, and 777F series 

airplanes. Because the affected Captain’s 

and First Officer’s seats are rotable 

parts, we have determined that these 

seats could later be installed on 

airplanes that were initially delivered 

with acceptable seats, thereby subjecting 

those airplanes to the unsafe condition. 

The referenced service bulletins can be 

used on airplanes not included in the 

service bulletin effectivity. This 

difference has been coordinated with 

Boeing. 

Where BSASB 777–25–0607, Revision 

1, specifies to do the actions within 72 

months after the original issue date of 

the service bulletin, this proposed AD 

would require accomplishment of those 

actions within 36 months after the 

effective date of this AD. The 36-month 

compliance time corresponds with the 

compliance time in BSASB 777–25– 

0619, Revision 1. We have determined 

a 36-month compliance time is 

appropriate for doing the actions 

specified in this proposed AD. We have 

coordinated this difference with Boeing. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 190 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 

estimate the following costs to comply 

with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS PER SEAT

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Identification, seat .............................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .... $0 $85 ............................. $85. 

Detailed inspection, horizontal movement system.1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .... 0 $85 ............................. $85. 

Checks, horizontal movement system 2 work-hour × $85 per hour = $170 

per check cycle.

0 $170 per check cycle. $170 per check cycle. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary on-condition actions that 

would be required. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these on-condition actions: 

ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS PER SEAT * 

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Adjustment, control lever cable .................................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........................... $0 ..................... $85. 

Overhaul, horizontal movement system .................... 11 work-hours × $85 per hour = $935 ..................... Up to $5,824 ..... Up to $6,759. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
66180 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS PER SEAT *—Continued 

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Inspection of each seat’s fore/aft and vertical manual control levers.1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........................... $0 ..................... $85. 

Installation of serviceable seats ................................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........................... $0 ..................... $85. 

Clearing FOD ............................................................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........................... $0 ..................... $85. 

Replacement of the horizontal actuator ..................... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85, per actuator ...... $205 ................. $290. 

Functional test, adjusted control lever cable ............. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ........................... $0 ..................... $85. 

* The estimated cost for tooling to align an affected seat for adjustment of the control lever cable is up to $46,064. 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the optional terminating 

action for the repetitive checks specified 

in this proposed AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

This proposed AD is issued in 

accordance with authority delegated by 

the Executive Director, Aircraft 

Certification Service, as authorized by 

FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance 

with that order, issuance of ADs is 

normally a function of the Compliance 

and Airworthiness Division, but during 

this transition period, the Executive 

Director has delegated the authority to 

issue ADs applicable to transport 

category airplanes and associated 

appliances to the Director of the System 

Oversight Division. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2018–1012; Product Identifier 2018– 

NM–132–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

The FAA must receive comments on this 

AD action by February 11, 2019. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to all The Boeing 

Company Model 777–200, –200LR, –300, 

–300ER, and 777F series airplanes, 

certificated in any category. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 25, Equipment/Furnishings. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

uncommanded movements of the Captain’s 

and First Officer’s seats. We are issuing this 

AD to address uncommanded movement of 

the Captain’s and First Officer’s seats. An 

uncommanded seat movement during a 

critical part of a flight, such as takeoff or 

landing, could cause a flight control 

obstruction or unintended flight control 

input, which could result in the loss of the 

ability to control the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Seat Part Number Identification and OnCondition Actions 

Within 36 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do an inspection to determine the 

part number, and serial number as 

applicable, of the Captain’s and First 

Officer’s seats, and do all applicable oncondition actions, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–25– 

0607, Revision 1, dated July 17, 2018. 

(h) Detailed Inspection and Repetitive 

Checks of Horizontal Movement System and 

On-Condition Actions 

Except as specified in paragraph (i) of this 

AD: At the applicable times specified in 

paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–25– 

0619, Revision 1, dated August 8, 2018 

(‘‘BSASB 777–25–0619, Revision 1’’), do all 

applicable actions identified as ‘‘RC’’ 

(required for compliance) in, and in 

accordance with, the Accomplishment 

Instructions of BSASB 777–25–0619, 

Revision 1. 

(i) Exception to Service Information 

Specifications 

For purposes of determining compliance 

with the requirements of this AD: Where 

BSASB 777–25–0619, Revision 1, uses the 

phrase ‘‘the original issue date of this service 

bulletin,’’ this AD requires using ‘‘the 

effective date of this AD.’’ 

(j) Optional Terminating Action for 

Repetitive Checks 

Installation of a serviceable Captain’s or 

First Officer’s seat as specified in, and in 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules 66181 

accordance with, the Accomplishment 

Instructions of BSASB 777–25–0619, 

Revision 1, terminates the repetitive checks 

required by paragraph (h) of this AD for that 

seat only. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 

14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your 

principal inspector or local Flight Standards 

District Office, as appropriate. If sending 

information directly to the manager of the 

certification office, send it to the attention of 

the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of 

this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair, 

modification, or alteration required by this 

AD if it is approved by the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO 

Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be 

approved, the repair method, modification 

deviation, or alteration deviation must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) For service information that contains 

steps that are labeled as Required for 

Compliance (RC), the provisions of 

paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) of this AD 

apply. 

(i) The steps labeled as RC, including 

substeps under an RC step and any figures 

identified in an RC step, must be done to 

comply with the AD. If a step or substep is 

labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC 

requirement is removed from that step or 

substep. An AMOC is required for any 

deviations to RC steps, including substeps 

and identified figures. 

(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be 

deviated from using accepted methods in 

accordance with the operator’s maintenance 

or inspection program without obtaining 

approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, 

including substeps and identified figures, can 

still be done as specified, and the airplane 

can be put back in an airworthy condition. 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Brandon Lucero, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems 

Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; 

phone and fax: 206–231–3569; email: 

Brandon.Lucero@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data 

Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., 

MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600; 

telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this 

referenced service information at the FAA, 

Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 

216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information 

on the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 206–231–3195. 

Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on 

December 14, 2018. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Director, System Oversight Division, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–27901 Filed 12–21–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter VI 

[Docket ID ED–2018–OPE–0076] 

RIN 1840–AD36, 1840–AD37, 1840–AD38, 

1840–AD40, and 1840–AD44 

Negotiated Rulemaking Committee; 

Location of Negotiations and 

Subcommittee Meetings— 

Accreditation and Innovation 

AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary 

Education, Department of Education. 

ACTION: Notice of location of 

negotiations and subcommittee 

meetings. 

SUMMARY: On October 15, 2018, we 

announced our intention to establish a 

negotiated rulemaking committee to 

prepare proposed regulations for the 

Federal Student Aid programs 

authorized under title IV of the Higher 

Education Act of 1965, as amended 

(HEA). In this notice, we announce the 

locations of each committee and 

subcommittee meeting. 

DATES: Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section for meeting dates. 

ADDRESSES: Please see the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 

meeting locations. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Aaron Washington, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW, 

Room 294–12, Washington, DC 20202. 

Telephone (202) 453–7241. Email: 

Aaron.Washington@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Locations for Negotiations and 

Subcommittee Meetings 

The Accreditation and Innovation 

Committee will meet for three sessions 

on the following dates: 

Session 1: January 14–16, 2019 

Session 2: February 19–22, 2019 

Session 3: March 25–28, 2019 

Sessions will run from 9:00 a.m. to 

5:00 p.m. 

The January committee meeting will 

be held at the U.S. Department of 

Education at: Lyndon Baines Johnson 

(LBJ) Building Barnard Auditorium, 400 

Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 

20202. 

The February committee meeting will 

be held at the U.S. Department of 

Education at: Potomac Center Plaza 

(PCP) Auditorium, 550 12th Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20202. 

The March committee meeting will be 

held at the U.S. Department of 

Education at: LBJ Building Barnard 

Auditorium, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, 

Washington, DC 20202. 

The committee meetings are open to 

the public to attend in person. The 

committee meetings will also be made 

available to the public through a 

Department-provided livestream. 

The Distance Learning and 

Educational Innovation Subcommittee 

will meet for three meetings on the 

following dates: 

Meeting 1: January 17–18, 2019 

Meeting 2: February 12–13, 2019 

Meeting 3: March 11–12, 2019 

Meetings will run from 9:00 a.m. to 

5:00 p.m. 

The subcommittee meetings will be 

held at the U.S. Department of 

Education at: LBJ Building, 400 

Maryland Ave. SW, Washington, DC 

20202. 

The January meeting will be held in 

room 1W113. The February meeting will 

be held in room 1W103. The March 

meeting will be held in room 1W126. 

The Faith-Based Entities 

Subcommittee will meet for three 

meetings on the following dates: 

Meeting 1: January 17–18, 2019 

Meeting 2: February 12–13, 2019 

Meeting 3: March 11–12, 2019 

Meetings will run from 9:00 a.m. to 

5:00 p.m. 

The subcommittee meetings will be 

held at the U.S. Department of 

Education at: LBJ Building, 400 

Maryland Ave. SW, Washington, DC 

20202. 

The January meeting will be held in 

room 297–05. The February meeting 

will be held in room 297–05. The March 

meeting will be held in room 1W113. 

The TEACH Grant Subcommittee will 

meet for three meetings on the following 

dates: 

Meeting 1: January 17–18, 2019 

Meeting 2: February 12–13, 2019 

Meeting 3: March 11–12, 2019 

Meetings will run from 9:00 a.m. to 

5:00 p.m. 

The subcommittee meetings will be 

held at the U.S. Department of 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1