alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. IV-09-003 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: (817) 860-8128 

 

 February 27, 2009 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

NRC ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ORDER TO SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY 

CORP. 

 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a Confirmatory Order to 

Schlumberger Technology Corp. of Sugar Land, Texas, to take corrective actions following an 

incident involving a lost gauge containing radioactive material. 

 Schlumberger has agreed to the terms of the Confirmatory Order that requires it to 

develop an enhanced accountability and security program for radioactive materials, conducting 

additional management reviews of the company’s radiation safety program and paying a $3,250 

civil penalty. 

 The terms of the Confirmatory Order were agreed to following Alternative Dispute 

Resolution (ADR), which uses a neutral mediator with no decision-making authority to assist the 

NRC and its licensees in resolving differences regarding enforcement actions. 

 The actions stemmed from an Oct. 4, 2007, report by Schlumberger to the NRC that it 

could not locate a device containing radioactive materials. A subsequent inspection by NRC 

determined that a former radiation safety officer at the company’s Rock Springs, Wyo., field 

station failed to conduct an adequate physical inventory of licensed radioactive materials as 

required by NRC regulations. 

 Copies of the Confirmatory Order issued by the NRC to Schlumberger are available on 

the NRC web site at: http: www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . 

 ### 

 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 612 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 

 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 

Telephone: (817) 860-8128
### §30505. Severability

If any provision of this division, an amendment made by this division, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this division, the amendments made by this division, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, §4709, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This division, referred to in text, is division E of Pub. L. 111–84, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2835, known as the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. For complete classification of division E to the Code, see Short Title of 2009 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 249 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1678

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to false communications 

about certain criminal violations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2003

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. 

GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr. KELLER, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. 

FERGUSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

false communications about certain criminal violations, 

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Hoax Terrorism 

5 Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HOAXES AND RECOVERY COSTS. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION ON HOAXES.—Chapter 47 of title 

8 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after sec9 tion 1036 the following: 
2

•HR 1678 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 1037. False information and hoaxes 

2 ‘‘(a) CRIMINAL VIOLATION.—Whoever engages in 

3 any conduct, with intent to convey false or misleading in4 formation, under circumstances where such information 

5 may reasonably be believed and where such information 

6 concerns an activity which would constitute a violation of 

7 section 175, 229, 831, or 2332a, shall be fined under this 

8 title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. 

9 ‘‘(b) CIVIL ACTION.—Whoever engages in any con10 duct, with intent to convey false or misleading informa11 tion, under circumstances where such information con12 cerns an activity which would constitute a violation of sec13 tion 175, 229, 831, or 2332a, is liable in a civil action 

14 to any party incurring expenses incident to any emergency 

15 or investigative response to that conduct, for those ex16 penses. 

17 ‘‘(c) REIMBURSEMENT.—The court, in imposing a 

18 sentence on a defendant who has been convicted of an of19 fense under subsection (a), shall order the defendant to 

20 reimburse any party incurring expenses incident to any 

21 emergency or investigative response to that conduct, for 

22 those expenses. A person ordered to make reimbursement 

23 under this subsection shall be jointly and severally liable 

24 for such expenses with each other person, if any, who is 

25 ordered to make reimbursement under this subsection for 

26 the same expenses. An order of reimbursement under this 
3

•HR 1678 IH 

1 subsection shall, for the purposes of enforcement, be treat2 ed as a civil judgment.’’. 

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

4 at the beginning of chapter 47 of title 18, United States 

5 Code, is amended by adding after the item for section 

6 1036 the following:

‘‘1037. False information and hoaxes.’’.

Æ
### §150904. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—(1) The board of directors is the governing body of the corporation. Between meetings of the corporation, the board is responsible for the general policies and program of the corporation. The board is responsible for the control of all funds of the corporation.

(2) The selection of directors and their term of office are as provided in the bylaws.

(b) Officers.—(1) The officers of the corporation are a president, one or more vice presidents, a secretary, a treasurer, and other officers as provided in the bylaws. Their duties are as provided in the bylaws.

(2) The officers shall be elected at the annual meeting of the corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1395.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150904(a) | 36:4507. | July 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–376, §§7, 8, 78 Stat. 322. |
| 150904(b) | 36:4508. | |

Section

In subsection (a), the text of 36:4507(a) is omitted as obsolete.
NRC NEWS

 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-07-016 May 30, 2007

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO HOLD TWO PUBLIC MEETINGS

ON PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold two public meetings in Tonopah,

Ariz., on performance improvements at the PaloVerde Nuclear Generating Station. Palo Verde,

which is operated by Arizona Public Service Co., is located 55 miles west of Phoenix.

The NRC will meet with APS officials at 6:30 p.m. on June 6, at the Saddle Mountain

Unified School District Administration Building Board Room, 38201 W. Indian School Road,

Tonopah, to discuss the status and focus areas for Palo Verde’s performance improvement plan. 

NRC officials will also discuss plans for a comprehensive inspection at Palo Verde. The meeting

is between NRC staff and APS officials, but members of the public will have an opportunity to

observe the meeting and ask questions of NRC staff prior to the end of the meeting. 

The NRC also will hold a “Town Hall” style meeting with the public at 6:30 p.m. on June

7 to discuss issues of public interest related to Palo Verde. NRC staff will present a brief

overview of activities at Palo Verde, then be available for questions and comments from the

public. The meeting will be held in the Cafeteria of the Ruth Fisher Elementary School, 38201

W. Indian School Road, Tonopah. 

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2028 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, with respect to 

the jurisdiction of Federal courts over certain cases and 

controversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 2028 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pledge Protection Act 

3 of 2004’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON JURISDICTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 99 of title 28, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘§ 1632. Limitation on jurisdiction 

9 ‘‘No court created by Act of Congress shall have any 

10 jurisdiction, and the Supreme Court shall have no appel11 late jurisdiction, to hear or decide any question pertaining 

12 to the interpretation of, or the validity under the Constitu13 tion of, the Pledge of Allegiance, as defined in section 4 

14 of title 4, or its recitation.’’. The limitation in this section 

15 shall not apply to the Superior Court of the District of 

16 Columbia or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. 

17 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

18 at the beginning of chapter 99 of title 28, United States 
3 

HR 2028 RDS 

1 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘1632. Limitation on jurisdiction.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 

2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stan Cipkowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


/s/ Stan Cipkowski
------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 10, 2006


                                       19
p110484.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0484

Focus Ready Draft 7/28/2011

ENGINEER: Avcin \ AG

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

 

OTHER USES: 

 

 

 

Page 1

p110484.eng

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0484

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3

p110484.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0484

 

 

 

 

Page 5
p110484.eng

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0484

 

 

 

 

 

Page 6


p110484.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 9
Exhibit 31.1

                       QUARTERLY CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Tsuida, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Alexander
International Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this quarterly report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of the most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
5th day of August 2003.

/s/ Robert Tsuida
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
### §60502. Definitions

In this Act—

(1) the term "exoneree" means an individual who—

(A) has been convicted of a Federal, tribal, or State offense that is punishable by a term of imprisonment of more than 1 year;

(B) has served a term of imprisonment for not less than 6 months in a Federal, tribal, or State prison or correctional facility as a result of the conviction described in subparagraph (A); and

(C) has been determined to be factually innocent of the offense described in subparagraph (A);

(2) the term "Indian tribe" has the meaning given in section 10251 of this title;

(3) the term "offender" includes an exoneree; and

(4) the term "Transitional Jobs strategy" means an employment strategy for youth and adults who are chronically unemployed or those that have barriers to employment that—

(A) is conducted by State, tribal, and local governments, State, tribal, and local workforce boards, and nonprofit organizations;

(B) provides time-limited employment using individual placements, team placements, and social enterprise placements, without displacing existing employees;

(C) pays wages in accordance with applicable law, but in no event less than the higher of the rate specified in section 206(a)(1) of title 29 or the applicable State or local minimum wage law, which are subsidized, in whole or in part, by public funds;

(D) combines time-limited employment with activities that promote skill development, remove barriers to employment, and lead to unsubsidized employment such as a thorough orientation and individual assessment, job readiness and life skills training, case management and supportive services, adult education and training, child support-related services, job retention support and incentives, and other similar activities;

(E) places participants into unsubsidized employment; and

(F) provides job retention, re-employment services, and continuing and vocational education to ensure continuing participation in unsubsidized employment and identification of opportunities for advancement.

(Pub. L. 110–199, §4, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 660; Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §502(g)(1), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5231.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 110–199, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 657, known as the Second Chance Act of 2007: Community Safety Through Recidivism Prevention and also as the Second Chance Act of 2007. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2008 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 17502 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–391 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In this Act, the term 'Indian Tribe' has the meaning given that term in section 10251 of this title."
[Cite as State v. Myers , 2015-Ohio-4789.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee

v. GENEICE MYERS Defendant-Appellant : : : : : : : : : : C.A. CASE NO. 26161 T.C. NO. 13CRB10811 (Criminal appeal from Municipal Court)

. . . . . . . . . . . O P I N I O N Rendered on the ___20th___ day of ____November___, 2015.

. . . . . . . . . . . STEPHANIE L. COOK, Atty. Reg. No. 00671 01 and EBONY N. WREH, Atty, Reg. No. 0080629, Assistant City Prosecutor, 335 W. Third Street, Rm. 372, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee THOMAS B. SCOTT, Atty. Reg. No. 0075341, Suite 2103, 130 W. Second Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Attorney for Defendant-Appellant

. . . . . . . . . . . . . DONOVAN, J. {¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the Notice of Appeal of Geneice Myers, filed April 8, 2014. Myers was convicted, following a January 23, 2014 bench trial in Dayton Municipal Court, of one count of telecommunications harassment, in violation of-2- R.C. 2917.21(B), a misdemeanor of the first degree. She received a sentence of 180 days, with 180 days suspended, and six months of community control sanctions, requiring 25 hours of community service to be completed by July 11, 2014, and basic supervision for six months. Myers was further ordered to complete a one-day anger management class through the probation department. Myers was released from community control on October 27, 2014. {¶ 2} Myers asserts three assignments of error herein as follows: THE COURT COMMITTED REVESIBLE ERROR BY DENYING APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO CRIMINAL RULE 29. And, THE APPELLANT’S CONVICTION FOR TELEPHONE HARASSMENT WAS AGAINTST THE MANIFEST WIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE. And, THE APPELLAN’T CONDUCT DID NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL OF ABUSE, THREAT OR HARASS. (SIC) {¶ 3} Myers did not seek a stay of her misdemeanor sentence. As this Court has previously noted: * * * It is well-settled that “where a criminal defendant, convicted of a misdemeanor, voluntarily satisfies the judgment imposed upon him or her for that offense, an appeal from the conviction is moot unless the defendant has offered evidence from which an inference can be drawn that he or she-3- will suffer some collateral legal disability or loss of civil rights stemming from that conviction.” * * * State v. Byrd , 185 Ohio App.3d 30, 2009-Ohio-5606, 923 N.E.2d 161, ¶ 10 (2d Dist.). {¶ 4} Myers has satisfied her misdemeanor sentence. She did not seek a stay from the trial court or this Court and offers no evidence of a collateral consequence of her conviction. Accordingly her moot appeal is dismissed.

. . . . . . . . . . FAIN, J. and WELBAUM, J., concur. Copies mailed to: Stephanie L. Cook Ebony N. Wreh Thomas B. Scott Hon. Christopher D. Roberts
#### Goldie Cook, as Administratrix of the Estate of Clara L. Mason, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Michael Siravo et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.