alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017085EN.01003801.xml

| 30.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 217/2015

of 25 September 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/524]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 13zzzzs (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/553) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘13zzzzt. | 32015 R 0408: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (OJ L 67, 12.3.2015, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13zzzzt.

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/408 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Ingrid SCHULERUD

---

(1)  
  OJ L 67, 12.3.2015, p. 18.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 1620.36 Transmission of information.

Any employee who moves to a NAF instrumentality must be reported by the losing Federal Government agency to the TSP record keeper as having transferred to a NAF instrumentality of the DOD or Coast Guard rather than as having separated from Government service. If the employee subsequently elects not to be covered by CSRS or FERS, the NAF instrumentality must submit an Employee Data Record to report the employee as having separated from Federal Government service as of the date of the move.
### Part H—Domestic Violence Task Force
Editorial Note on Subpart C of Part 316
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart C of part 316 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 316.304 Trial period. ( a ) The first year of service of a term employee is a trial period regardless of the method of appointment. Prior Federal civilian service is credited toward completion of the required trial period in the same manner as prescribed by § 315.802 of this chapter.
( b ) The agency may terminate a term employee at any time during the trial period. The employee is entitled to the procedures set forth in § 315.804 or § 315.805 of this chapter as appropriate.
[33 FR 12423, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 63 FR 63783, Nov. 17, 1998]
### §853o–1. Credit of service as deck officer or junior engineer and certain other active service for retirement and retirement pay

Active service in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration as a deck officer or junior engineer and active service counted on June 30, 1922, for longevity pay, shall be credited to commissioned officers as active commissioned service for purposes of retirement and retirement pay.

(Pub. L. 87–649, §9(c), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 496; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 302 of Title 37 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services, by Pub. L. 87–649, §1, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 451.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 1, 1962, see section 15 of Pub. L. 87–649, set out as a note preceding section 101 of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Coast and Geodetic Survey consolidated with Weather Bureau to form a new agency in Department of Commerce to be known as Environmental Science Services Administration, and commissioned officers of Survey transferred to ESSA, by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318, set out as a note under section 851 of this title. The Reorg. Plan also transferred to Secretary of Commerce all functions of Coast and Geodetic Survey and Director of Survey. Subsequently, Environmental Science Services Administration abolished, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration established, and Commissioned Officer Corps of ESSA redesignated Commissioned Officer Corps of NOAA by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. For further details, see note set out under section 851 of this title.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-009 January 23, 2007

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS TO MEET FEB. 1-3 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)will hold a public meeting Feb. 1-3 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the final reviewof the 5 percent power uprate application for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Unit 1. Portions of thisdiscussion may be closed to protect proprietary information. The committee will also perform the finalreview of the license renewal application for the Oyster Creek Generating Station.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and end at 7 p.m. on Thursday and Friday andat 1 p.m. on Saturday. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at:http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2007/ .

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting shouldcontact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. To pursue videoconferencing services, contact TheronBrown at 301-415-8066.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants andrelated safety issues.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
---

Exhibit 1.7

|Province of British Columbia
|----------------------------
|                            
|FORM 19                     
|                            
|(Section 348)               
|                            
|COMPANY ACT                 
|                            
|SPECIAL RESOLUTION          

| | Certificate of    |       
| | ----------------- | ------
| | Incorporation No. | 210187

The following special resolution was passed by
  the undermentioned Company on the date stated:

|Name of Company:        | TERYL RESOURCES CORP.
|----------------------- | ---------------------
|                        |                      
|Date resolution passed: | January 22, 2003     

Special Resolution:

BE IT RESOLVED that
  the name of the Company be changed from Teryl Resources Corp. to
  Teryl Gold Corp.

(Altered Memorandum attached)

CERTIFIEDa true copy the 23rdday
  of January, 2003.

| | John
      Robertson, President and
| | -----------------------------------
| | Director                           

---

|COMPANY ACT                                                     
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|FORM 1                                                          
|                                                                
|ALTERED MEMORANDUM                                              
|                                                                
|(as altered by Special Resolution passed January
      22, 2003)

I wish to be formed in to a company with limited
  liability under the British Columbia Company Act in pursuance of this
  Memorandum.

|1. | The name of the Company is TERYL
        GOLD INC.                                                                                                                                                                
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The authorized capital of the Company
        consists of 105,000,000 shares divided into 100,000,000 common shares
        without par value and 5,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $1.00
        each.
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|   | There will be attached to the preferred
        shares the rights and restrictions as set forth in the Articles of the
        Company.                                                                             

---
2011 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-29-2011

USA v. Walker

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 10-3623

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2011

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2011 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Walker" (2011). 2011 Decisions. Paper 453.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2011/453
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

__________

No. 10-3623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

AHMED WALKER, a/k/a Amelios, a/k/a Ammo,

Ahmed Walker,

Appellant.

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D. C. No. 1-00-cr-00300-003)

District Judge: Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

on July 15, 2011

Opinion filed September 9, 2011

Before: RENDELL, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed on September 9, 2011, is hereby 

vacated and an amended opinion shall be filed simultaneously with this order. The 

revised opinion does not alter the September 9, 2011 judgment or the panel’s 
decision to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing..

By the Court,

/s/ Jane R. Roth

Circuit Judge

Dated: 29 September 2011
Exhibit 10.14     Tommy L. Andrews, John B. (Jack) Benton, Laura Jo De Cespedes, Kathleen Flanagan, George W.Gresham, Rahul Gupta, Kay J. Nichols, Larence Park, Kevin L. Reager and Clyde L. Thomas haveentered into Change in Control Agreements that are substantially identical in all respects to theagreement with Paul F. Walsh that was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.     Steven F. Coleman has entered into a Change in Control Agreement that, as amended, issubstantially identical in all material respects to the Agreement and amendment thereto filed asExhibits 10.29 and 10.30, respectively, to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2000.
From: "steamhelp" <steamhelp@erg.com> 

 To: <Gary.Pendergrass@cityutilities.net> 

 Cc: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Deborah 

Bartram" <Deborah.Bartram@erg.com>

 

 Date: 07/09/2010 12:58 PM 

 Subject: Re: Effluent Guidelines ICR 

Gary,

My name is Elizabeth Sabol, from Eastern Research Group, Inc. under a

contract to U.S. EPA for the steam electric questionnaire. ERG is

responsible for technical help regarding the questionnaire. All

extension requests should be handled directly with EPA. Below, please

find the contact information for EPA regarding extension requests, also

found in the questionnaire instructions.
Jezebele Alicea

USEPA Headquarters

Ariel Rios Building

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Mail Code: 4303T

Washington, DC 20460

alicea.jezebele@epa.gov

202-566-1755

Please let us know if we can help with any of the technical information

requested in the questionnaire.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth

U.S. EPA Steam Electric Helpline

c/o Eastern Research Group, Inc.

14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200

Chantilly VA 20151

(703) 633-1696

Toll Free: (877) 353-7560

>>> <Gary.Pendergrass@cityutilities.net> 7/9/2010 10:43 AM >>>

We need to request extensions of time to complete the questionnaires for

our James River Power Station (Plant ID 00548) and Southwest Power

Station (Plant ID 05265). How long of an extension will you grant?

Regards,

Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG

Manager - Environmental Compliance

Governmental Relations/Environmental Affairs

City Utilities of Springfield

301 E. Central Street

P.O. Box 551

Springfield, MO 65801

Ph: 417-831-8501

Fx: 417-831-8771

E-mail: gary.pendergrass@cityutilities.net
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20611 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR ARMANDO GARCIA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-929-ALL

-------------------- February 20, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Armando Garcia-Sanchez appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Sanchez argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case. He contends that the unconstitutional portions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 should be severed from the statute. He asks usNo. 02-20611 -2- to vacate his conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for resentencing under that provision. Alternatively, he asks us to simply vacate his sentence and remand his case for resentencing under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Garcia-Sanchez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been called into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-024 February 23, 2007

NRC RE-SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS REVISIONS, ADDITIONS TO

PHYSICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has rescheduled a public meeting for March 9, 2007,

from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. to discuss a proposed rule amending its security regulations related to the

physical protection of nuclear power reactors. The originally scheduled meeting was cancelled due to

inclement weather.

The meeting will be held in the Commissioners’ Hearing Room, at NRC headquarters, in the

One White Flint North building, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. Registration will begin at 

8 a.m. A telephone bridge line will also be available. To pre-register for the bridge, call 301-415-2589

or send an e-mail to ljr2@nrc.gov by March 6.

The proposed rule enhances requirements for access controls, event reporting, security

personnel training, safety and security activity coordination, contingency planning and radiological

sabotage protection. It would also add requirements related to background checks for firearms users

and authorization for enhanced weapons to fulfill certain provisions in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

This proposed rule was published in the Federal Register last year inviting the public to submit

comments. The comment period ends today. In order to allow all stakeholders time to understand the

rule and ensure the NRC has a full understanding of stakeholder issues, the comment period will be

reopened until March 26. The entire proposed rule along with information on how to submit comments

can be found on the NRC’s eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov .

 More information about security requirements for NRC licensees can be found on the NRC’s

Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/safety-security.html .

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's

Web site.
§ 2636.102 Definitions. The definitions listed below are of general applicability to this part. Additional definitions of narrower applicability appear in the subparts or sections of subparts to which they apply. For purposes of this part: ( a ) *Agency ethics official* refers to the designated agency ethics official and to any deputy ethics official described in § 2638.204 of this subchapter to whom authority to issue advisory opinions under § 2636.103 of this part has been delegated by the designated agency ethics official.
( b ) *Designated agency ethics official* refers to the official described in § 2638.201 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Employee* means any officer or employee of the executive branch, other than a special Government employee as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202. It includes officers but not enlisted members of the uniformed services as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2101(3). It does not include the President or Vice President.
( d ) *Executive branch* includes each executive agency as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105 and any other entity or administrative unit in the executive branch. However, it does not include any agency that is defined by 5 U.S.C. app. 109(11) as within the legislative branch.
( e ) The terms *he, his,* and *him* include “she,” “hers” and “her.”
[56 FR 1723, Jan. 17, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 43068, Aug. 12, 1998]
### §194. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644

Section, acts Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §38, 41 Stat. 451; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145, related to fees and commissions of registers (successors to consolidated offices of registers and receivers), the predecessors of managers.
§ 362.109 Reporting requirements. Agencies must provide information requested by OPM regarding workforce planning strategies that includes: ( a ) Information on the entry-level occupations targeted for filling positions under this part in the coming three fiscal years;
( b ) The percentage of overall hiring expected in the coming three fiscal years under the Internship, Recent Graduates, and Presidential Management Fellows Programs; and
( c ) Every three fiscal years beginning with fiscal year (FY)—2024 (*i.e.,* FY24 and then again in FY27, etc.), for each of the preceding three fiscal years: ( 1 ) The number of individuals initially appointed under each Pathways Program;
( 2 ) The percentage of the agency's overall hires made from each Pathways Program;
( 3 ) The number of Pathways Participants, per Program, converted to the competitive service; and
( 4 ) The number of Pathways Participants.
[89 FR 25771, Apr. 12, 2024]
§ 550.312 General limitations. ( a ) The allotter must specifically designate the allottee and the amount of the allotment.
( b ) The total amount of allotments may not exceed the pay due the allotter for a particular period.
( c ) The allotter must personally authorize a change or cancellation of an allotment.
( d ) The agency has no liability in connection with any authorized allotment disbursed by the agency in accordance with the allotter's request.
( e ) Any disputes regarding any authorized allotment are a matter between the allotter and the allottee.
( f ) Notwithstanding the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section, an agency may make an allotment for an employee's share of Federal Employees Health Benefits premiums under § 550.311(a)(7) and part 892 of this chapter without specific authorization from the employee, unless the employee specifically waives such allotment. Agency procedures for processing employee waivers must be consistent with procedures established by the Office of Personnel Management. (See part 892 of this chapter.)
[46 FR 2325, Jan. 9, 1981, as amended at 64 FR 69176, Dec. 10, 1999; 65 FR 44644, July 19, 2000; 71 FR 66828, Nov. 17, 2006]