alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 23.1    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS CONSENT The Board of Directors
eFunds Corporation: We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements filed on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-51568, 333-51564, 333-51536, and 333-44830) of eFunds Corporation of our reports dated
March 14, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of eFunds Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and all
related financial statement schedules, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004
annual report on Form 10-K of eFunds Corporation.  /s/ KPMG LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 14, 2005
§ 731.303 Answer. ( a ) *Respondent's answer.* A respondent may answer the charges in writing and furnish documentation and/or affidavits in support of the answer. To be timely, a written answer must be submitted no more than 30 days after the date of the notice of proposed action.
( b ) *Agency's answer.* An employing agency may also answer the notice of proposed action. The time limit for filing such an answer is 30 days from the date of the notice. In reaching a decision, OPM will consider any answer the agency makes.
EFAHrt^lfikW^ GENERAL OF TEXAS 

•^^^NSPORTAIJ' 

:;:::•• OPERA! G ABBOT T 

DECEIVED 

•^N - 6 ;oii 

ARING DOCKET 

Januarys, 2011 

iCil M 11 P 2: 02 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS, M-2 0 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

East Bldg. Ground Fir., Rm. El2-320 

Washington DC 20590 

Ph: (202) 366-2139 / Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Re: U.S. Dep't of Trans., Office of Hearings, Washington D.C.; In the matter of the Executive 

Office of the State of Texas; FAA Docket No. CP09SO0014; DMS No. FAA-2009-1045 

Dear Judge Goodwin: 

This letter brief is submitted with respect to the applicability of Appendix A to this case, as 

addressed by counsel yesterday during argument. The Guard offered Appendix A as authority and 

guidance for calculating civil penalties. The FAA argued that Appendix A related to pipeline safety. 

The Appendix begins at p. 43 of the copy tendered to the court. The top of the page is titled Pipeline 

and Hazardous Materials - Safety Administration (emphasis added). More importantly, the rules 

referred to in the Appendix are FAA rules, most of which are found at 49 CFR § § 171.001, e/ seq, 

and 172.001, et seq. Every regulation that the FAA claims the Guard violated is found in the 

Appendix. Clearly it is relevant to calculation of the penalty. 

The FAA should not be permitted to charge violation of its regulations and then disclaim their 

applicability when the penalty is determined. 

ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION & ADMIN. LAW DIV. 

Ph: (512) 475-4208 / Fax: (512) 320-0167 

michael.crowleyfgjoag.state.tx.us 

cc: Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

600 Independence Ave, SW 

Wilbur Wright Bldg, Ste 2W1000 

Washington DC 20591 

Via FedEx 796626141987 

Gerald A. Ellis 

Via Facsimile: (404) 305-5223 

Major Sonya Batchelor 

Via Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

POS T OFFICE Box 12548, AUSTIN , TEXA S 78711-2548 TEL: (512)463-2100 

WEB: WWW.OAG.STATE.TX.US 

An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper
#### William S. Mark et al., Doing Business as Uptown Handkerchief Co., et al., Appellants, v. Commerce Realty Corp., Respondent.

No opinion. Present —• Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, WU Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                  |  |  |  |                   |  |                        
|----- |  | ---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | February 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    WU Yuxiang
|      |  |                  |  |  |  | Name:             |  | WU Yuxiang             
|      |  |                  |  | 
|      |  |                  |  |  |  | Title:            |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 201.27 Special procedures: Medical records. ( a ) While an individual has an unqualified right of access to the records in systems of records maintained by the Commission which pertain to him or her, medical and psychological records merit special treatment because of the possibility that disclosure will have an adverse physical or psychological effect upon the requesting individual. Accordingly, in those instances where an individual is requesting the medical and/or psychological records which pertain to him or her, he or she shall, in his or her Privacy Act request to the Privacy Act Officer as called for in § 201.24(a) of this part, specify a physician to whom the medical and/or psychological records may be released.
( b ) It shall be the responsibility of the individual requesting medical or psychological records to specify a physician to whom the requested records may be released. If an individual refuses to name a physician and insists on inspecting his or her medical or psychological records in the absence of a doctor's discussion and advice, the individual shall so state in his or her Privacy Act request to the Privacy Act Officer as called for in § 201.24(a) of this part and the Privacy Act Officer shall provide access to or transmit such records directly to the individual.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44826, 333-58020, 333-118614 and 333-135396) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2000 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 1996 StockOption Plan, the 1988 Stock Option Plan and certain Non-Plan Stock Option Agreements with Telik, Inc. and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-108031, 333-114366 and 333-89596) for the registration of $200,000,000 of equity securitiesand in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated February 29, 2008, with respect to the financial statements of Telik, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Telik, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP 

Palo Alto, California 

February 29, 2008
#### § 550.604 Biweekly pay periods and computation of pay.

Agencies must apply the biweekly pay period and computation of pay provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5504 for employees covered by § 550.602(a).
#### § 550.902 Definitions.

In this subpart: *Agency* has the meaning given that term in 5 U.S.C. 5102(a)(1).

*Duty involving physical hardship* means duty that may not in itself be hazardous, but causes extreme physical discomfort or distress and is not adequately alleviated by protective or mechanical devices, such as duty involving exposure to extreme temperatures for a long period of time, arduous physical exertion, or exposure to fumes, dust, or noise that causes nausea, skin, eye, ear, or nose irritation.

*Employee* means an employee covered by the General Schedule (*i.e.,* covered by chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code).

*Hazardous duty* means duty performed under circumstances in which an accident could result in serious injury or death, such as duty performed on a high structure where protective facilities are not used or on an open structure where adverse conditions such as darkness, lightning, steady rain, or high wind velocity exist.

*Hazard pay differential* means additional pay for the performance of hazardous duty or duty involving physical hardship.

*Head of an agency* means the head of an agency or an official who has been delegated the authority to act for the head of the agency in the matter concerned.

[56 FR 20344, May 3, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 33416, June 29, 1994; 64 FR 69179, Dec. 10, 1999]
§ 5.2 Investigation and evaluations. The Director may secure effective implementation of the civil service laws, rules, and regulations, and all Executive orders imposing responsibilities on the Office by: ( a ) Investigating the qualifications, suitability, and fitness of applicants for positions in the competitive service, positions in the excepted service where the incumbent can be noncompetitively converted to the competitive service, career appointments to positions in the Senior Executive Service, and any other positions in the excepted service of the executive branch for which the Director has standard-setting responsibility under Civil Service Rule II. ( i ) The Director may require appointments to be made subject to investigation to enable the Director to determine, after appointment, that the requirements of law or the Civil Service Rules and Regulations have been met.
( ii ) The Director may cause positions to be designated based on risk to determine the appropriate level of investigation, and may prescribe investigative standards, policies, and procedures.
( iii ) The Director may prescribe standards for reciprocal acceptance by agencies of investigations and adjudications of suitability and fitness, except to the extent authority to apply additional fitness standards is vested by statute in an agency.
( b ) Evaluating the effectiveness of: (1) Personnel policies, programs, and operations of Executive and other Federal agencies subject to the jurisdiction of the Office, including their effectiveness with regard to merit selection and employee development; (2) agency compliance with and enforcement of applicable laws, rules, regulations and office directives; and (3) agency personnel management evaluation systems.
( c ) Investigating, or directing an agency to investigate and report on, apparent violations of applicable laws, rules, regulations, or directives requiring corrective action, found in the course of an evaluation.
[45 FR 4337, Jan. 22, 1980, as amended by E.O. 13197, 66 FR 7853, Jan. 25, 2001; E.O. 13764, 82 FR 8115, Jan. 23, 2017]
### §4009. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Under Secretary to carry out sections 4002 and 4003 of this title $20,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018, and $20,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

#### (b) Extramural research activities

The Under Secretary shall ensure that a substantial portion of funds appropriated pursuant to subsection (a) that are used for research purposes are allocated to extramural research activities. For each fiscal year, the Under Secretary shall publish a list of all grant recipients and the amounts for all of the funds allocated for research purposes, specifying those allocated for extramural research activities.

(Pub. L. 105–383, title VI, §610, formerly §609, as added Pub. L. 113–124, §11, June 30, 2014, 128 Stat. 1386; amended Pub. L. 115–423, §9(h), Jan. 7, 2019, 132 Stat. 5464; renumbered §610, Pub. L. 117–144, §2(a)(1), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–423 inserted ", and $20,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023" before period at end.
# L_2018089EN.01002102.xml

| 5.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/21

---

Corrigendum to the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 294/2015 of 30 October 2015 amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1083]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 161 of 22 June 2017
  )

On page 90, the text in the second paragraph of Article 3 of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 294/2015 is replaced as follows:

for:

‘Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 293/3015’,

read:

‘Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 293/2015’.

---
#### Alice M. Ryder, as Administratrix of the Estate of George Benesh, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Mill Basin Asphalt Corporation et al., Defendants, City of New York, Defendant-Respondent, and Taylor-Fiohter Steel Construction Co., Inc., Impleaded Defendant, Appellant.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., "concur.
§ 1200.4 Petition for rulemaking. ( a ) Any interested person may petition the MSPB for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule. For purposes of this regulation, a “rule” means a regulation contained in 5 CFR parts 1200 through 1216. Each petition shall: ( 1 ) Be submitted to the Clerk of the Board, 1615 M Street NW., Washington, DC 20419;
( 2 ) Set forth the text or substance of the rule or amendment proposed or specify the rule sought to be repealed;
( 3 ) Explain the petitioner's interest in the action sought; and
( 4 ) Set forth all data and arguments available to the petitioner in support of the action sought.
( b ) No public procedures will be held on the petition before its disposition. If the MSPB finds that the petition contains adequate justification, a rulemaking proceeding will be initiated or a final rule will be issued as appropriate under the Administrative Procedure Act. If the Board finds that the petition does not contain adequate justification, the petition will be denied by letter or other notice, with a brief statement of the ground for denial. The Board may consider new evidence at any time; however, repetitious petitions for rulemaking will not be considered.
[77 FR 62363, Oct. 12, 2012]
### subpart 1—community economic partnership investment funds
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7960

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARLON STAFFORD BENJAMIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-01-125; CA-03-1017-1) Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 28, 2005 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marlon Stafford Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Marlon Stafford Benjamin seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Benjamin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 550.321 Authority.

Section 7115, title 5, United States Code, authorizes an employee to make an allotment for dues to a labor organization as defined in subchapter 1 of chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. Such an allotment shall be effected in accordance with such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Federal Labor Relations Authority.
§ 251.102 Coverage. To be covered by this part, an association or organization: ( a ) Must be a lawful, nonprofit organization whose constitution and bylaws indicate that it subscribes to minimum standards of fiscal responsibility and employs democratic principles in the nomination and election of officers;
( b ) Must not discriminate in terms of membership or treatment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or handicapping condition;
( c ) Must not assist or participate in a strike, work stoppage, or slowdown against the Government of the United States or any agency thereof or impose a duty or obligation to conduct, assist, or participate in such strike, work stoppage, or slowdown; and
( d ) Must not advocate the overthrow of the constitutional form of Government of the United States.
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1825

For the relief of Frank Redendo. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mrs. KELLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Frank Redendo.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION FOR VACCINE-RELATED IN4 JURY. 

5 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATION.—The time limita6 tion set forth in section 2116(a)(1) of the Public Health 

7 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa–16(a)(1)) shall not apply 

8 to a petition for compensation filed under section 2111 

9 of that Act by Frank Redendo of Carmel, New York, for 

10 injuries received as a result of a vaccine administered in 

11 March, 1964. 
2

•HR 1825 IH 

1 (b) DEADLINE.—Subsection (a) shall apply only to 

2 a petition filed not later than 2 years after the date of 

3 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofToo Late Financial Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
#### Seamlex Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Blumstein Bros., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §943. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–348, §1(15), Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1311

Section, act Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §43, 44 Stat. 1444, required Secretary to make a report to Congress at beginning of each regular session of the administration of this chapter for preceding fiscal year, including a detailed statement of receipts of and expenditures from funds established in sections 944 and 945 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Security Industry Association (“SIA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Security Industry Association, Alexandria, VA. The nature and scope of SIA's standards development                           ( print page 64108)                        activities are: Standards for the manufacturers of electronic security equipment, including those activities related to the design, production, installation, monitoring, maintenance, and other treatments or aspects of electronic security equipment, including alarm and non-alarm equipment, such as law enforcement response and telecommunication signaling utilizing the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).                

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24560  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M