alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §204. Preference for United States industry

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no small business firm or nonprofit organization which receives title to any subject invention and no assignee of any such small business firm or nonprofit organization shall grant to any person the exclusive right to use or sell any subject invention in the United States unless such person agrees that any products embodying the subject invention or produced through the use of the subject invention will be manufactured substantially in the United States. However, in individual cases, the requirement for such an agreement may be waived by the Federal agency under whose funding agreement the invention was made upon a showing by the small business firm, nonprofit organization, or assignee that reasonable but unsuccessful efforts have been made to grant licenses on similar terms to potential licensees that would be likely to manufacture substantially in the United States or that under the circumstances domestic manufacture is not commercially feasible.

(Added Pub. L. 96–517, §6(a), Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3023.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1981, but implementing regulations authorized to be issued earlier, see section 8(f) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
#### Troy Savings Bank, Respondent, v. Rebecca Scheer, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no park
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In
connection with the quarterly report of Bonanza Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
 Date:
August 14, 2008
  /s/
      Ran FurmanRan
      FurmanChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
   Date:
August 14, 2008
  /s/
      William WisemanWilliam
      WisemanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer,(Principal
      Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward M. Krell, ExecutiveVice President-Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| **/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL**                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward M. Krell                                     |
| *Executive Vice President-Chief  Financial Officer* |
| February 9, 2007                                    |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Bright, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §383. International design application

In addition to any requirements pursuant to chapter 16, the international design application shall contain—

(1) a request for international registration under the treaty;

(2) an indication of the designated Contracting Parties;

(3) data concerning the applicant as prescribed in the treaty and the Regulations;

(4) copies of a reproduction or, at the choice of the applicant, of several different reproductions of the industrial design that is the subject of the international design application, presented in the number and manner prescribed in the treaty and the Regulations;

(5) an indication of the product or products that constitute the industrial design or in relation to which the industrial design is to be used, as prescribed in the treaty and the Regulations;

(6) the fees prescribed in the treaty and the Regulations; and

(7) any other particulars prescribed in the Regulations.

(Added Pub. L. 112–211, title I, §101(a), Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1528.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the later of the date that is 1 year after Dec. 18, 2012, or the date that the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs enters into force with respect to the United States (May 13, 2015), and applicable only to certain applications filed on and after that effective date and patents issuing thereon, see section 103 of Pub. L. 112–211, set out as an Effective Date of 2012 Amendment note under section 100 of this title.
### §110108. Duty to maintain corporate and tax-exempt status

(a) Corporate Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as a corporation incorporated under the laws of New York.

(b) Tax-Exempt Status.—The corporation shall maintain its status as an organization exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1368.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110108(a) | 36:2701(b). | Aug. 21, 1984, Pub. L. 98–391, §§1(b), 15 (1st sentence), 98 Stat. 1358, 1361. |
| 110108(b) | 36:2714 (1st sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "retain and" and "organized and" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Ethel S. Klauber et al., Appellants, against William S. Miller et al., as Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments of the City of New York, Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

We do not construe the statement of the city’s expert concerning the numerous sales called to his attention as a refusal on his part to give due consideration thereto. We think that he intended merely to indicate that, in his opinion, said sales were not entitled to great weight as an indication of value, because of the unusual conditions under which they were made. Of course, evidence of numerous sales in the vicinity under circumstances that have continued for a considerable number of years is entitled to due consideration in determining assessments. (See *People ex rel. Four Park Avenue Corp.*v. *Lilly,*267 App. Div. 102, decided herewith.) While receipt of the evidence referred to does not warrant a reversal of the order, we think that all *997the circumstances warrant some further reduction in the valuations, as fixed. We, therefore, modify the order appealed from, as follows:

> *Land Building Total*

> 1937 $37,500 ■ $82,500 $120,000

> 1938-39 36,500 81,000 117,500

> 1939-40 36,000 79,500 115,500

> 1940-41 36,000 78,000 114,000

> 1941-42 35,000 76,500 111,500

As so modified the order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the relators-appellants.

Present — Townley, Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously modified as indicated in opinion and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the relators-appellants. Settle order on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24218]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

32 CFR Part 1910


Debarment and Suspension Procedures

AGENCY: Central Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with its statutory procurement authorities, the 
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has established a policy whereby the 
rights of CIA contractors in all matters involving debarment and 
suspension will be governed by the debarment and suspension provisions 
of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

DATES: Effective October 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harvy P. Cooper, Legal Staff, Office 
of the Chief Information Officer, Central Intelligence Agency, 
telephone 703-613-1287.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 1910

    Debarment and suspension procedures.


0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Central Intelligence Agency 
adds 32 CFR Part 1910 as follows:

PART 1910--DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION PROCEDURES

Sec.
1910.1 General.

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. 401-442; 50 U.S.C. 403a-403u; 48 CFR ch. 1, 
subpart 9.4.


Sec.  1910.1  General.

    The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), in accordance with its 
authorities under the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, as 
amended, and the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, has an 
established debarment and suspension process in accordance with subpart 
9.402(d) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). This process and 
the causes for debarment and suspension are consistent with those found 
in FAR 9.406 and 9.407. The rights of CIA contractors in all matters 
involving debarment and suspension are hereby governed by the 
provisions of subpart 9.4 of the FAR.

    Dated: October 14, 2004.
Edmund Cohen,
Director of Information Management Services, Office of the Chief 
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-24218 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6310-02-P
DARLINGTON COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

       CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Charles A. Hardin,  the Vice  President of Darlington  County Bank, the only and
wholly-owned  subsidiary of Darlington County Bancshares,  Inc. (the "Company"),
the closest  equivalent  to a chief  financial  officer of the  Company,  hereby
certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   This Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company (the "Report")  fully
          complies  with  the   requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as
          applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of complying with the
requirements  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350)  and  may not be  relied  upon  by  anyone  for  any  other  purpose.  The
undersigned  expressly  disclaims any undertaking to update such  certifications
except as required by law.


Date: March 24, 2004                  /s/ Charles A. Hardin
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Charles A. Hardin
                                      Vice President
                                      (Acting as Chief Financial Officer)
                                      Darlington County Bank


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Darlington  County  Bancshares,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by
Darlington County Bancshares,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
AFS

- 14

- 212

- E

July 22, 2014

Mr. Alex C. Anderegg

2261 N. Hil l top Dr. Muskegon, MI 49441

Dear Mr. Anderegg :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption, and explains why we cannot process your request for exemption , from §§ 61.160( b ) (3 ) (i) and ( b )(3) (ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

You entered a petition for exemption on March 24 , 2014

, into the public docket (No. FAA

2014

- 0201 ), but we are unable to process you r request any further. The relief that you are seeking is for an eligibility requirement for the restricted privileges airline transport pilot ( R

ATP) certificate. If an individual were granted the relief you have requested, further relief

from additiona l requirements listed in § 61.160(b ) would be needed to exercise that re lief.

Specifically, § 61.160(b)(1) require s an applicant for an R

- ATP certificate to hold a Bachelor’s degree with an aviation major from an institution of higher education that has been

issued a letter of authorization (LOA) by the FAA under § 61.169 (b)

. Under § 61.169(b), an institution of higher education must comply with the LOA and may not certify a graduate unless it determines that the graduate meets the requirements of § 61.1 60.

Additionally

, under § 61.160(b)(4)

, an applicant for a n R

- ATP certificate with an airplane category multiengine class rating

, or R

- ATP certificate obtained concurrently with an airplane type rating “must present an official transcript and certifying d ocument from an institution of higher education that holds a letter of authorization from the Administrator under § 61.169.”

The relief that you have requested would not permit an institution of higher education to deviate from the requirements prescribed in § 61.169 or the conditions listed in the letter of

authorization.

In summary the relief for which you are petitioning the FAA is insufficient for the outcome

you are seeking and would not provide the appropriate relief for an individual to be eligible

for an R

- ATP in accordance with § 61.160(b). The FAA will only consider the relief that you have requested from an institution of higher education, as defined in § 61.1, which has the2

same meaning as defined by the Department of Education in 34 CFR 600.4. Th e authority to certify graduates for an ATP certificate under the academic and aeronautical experience requirements in § 61.160 may be satisfied only by the institution’s determination of eligibility. In consideration of the forgoing the FAA will take no further action on your request for an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.160(c)(2) and 61.160(c)(3)

.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further If you have any questions, you ma y call Carl N. Johnson, Acting Deputy Division Manager (AFS

- 801) General Aviation and Commercial Division, Flight Standards Service at (202)

- 385

- 9600.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
GAO-01-897R The Military Chaplains Association of the U.S.A.

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

June 26, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for The Military Chaplains Association of the United States of

America for 1999 and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of The

Military Chaplains Association of the United States of America, a federally chartered

corporation, for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998. The corporation’s

purpose is to assist chaplains in the performance of their duties, promote the

effectiveness of the military chaplaincy, and encourage individuals to enter the

chaplaincy.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-897R The Military Chaplains Association of the U.S.A.

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(194046)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Norman S. Johnson, the Chief Financial Officer of California Oil & Gas Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas Corporation for the period ended February 28, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of California Oil & Gas Corporation.

Dated April 25, 2007.

/s/ Norman S. Johnson                        

Norman S. Johnson

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer

and Principal Accounting Officer)
### §114. Leif Erikson Day

The President may issue each year a proclamation designating October 9 as Leif Erikson Day.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1257.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 114 | 36:169c. | Sept. 2, 1964, Pub. L. 88–566, 78 Stat. 849. |

Section
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Vanessa Avila, President and Chief Executive Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc. for the period ended November 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.

Dated: January 21, 2007

/s/ Vanessa AvilaVanessa Avila
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 107–248

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2904, MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2002

OCTOBER 16, 2001.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 268]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 268, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report and against its consideration. The resolution further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ
NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET MAY 8-10 IN ROCKVILLE, MD. 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards 

(ACRS) will hold a public meeting May 8-10 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, 

presentations by NRC staff and General Electric-Hitachi Nuclear Energy regarding selected 

chapters of the safety evaluation report for the Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor 

design certification application. In addition, there will be a review and discussion of the draft 

report on approaches for using probabilistic risk assessment methods for digital systems and the 

license renewal application for the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant. 

Portions of this meeting, identified in the agenda, may be closed to protect proprietary 

information. 

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants 

and related safety issues. 

 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North 

building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. Thursday’s session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7 p.m., Friday’s 

session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and Saturday’s session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 

1:30 p.m. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2008 . 

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting 

should contact Girija S. Shukla, at (301) 415-6855. To pursue video conferencing services, 

contact Theron Brown, at (301) 415-8066. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-086 April 28, 2008
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment # 10

Pt. 2, Sec. B

Additional Information on the Absence of Water Releases during Manufacture,

Processing, and End UseTS- ACET10/20/30/40/50
472 P.2d 382

#### Eloy P. QUINTANA, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent.

No. 9082.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 2, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 417, 81 N.M. 671, 472 P.2d 385, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.