alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Chang-Bun Yoon, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of hanarotelecom incorporated (the“Company”).
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 29, 2005
     /s/ Chang-Bun YoonChang-Bun Yoon
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-143 November 17, 2006

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST A HEARING ON DECOMMISSIONING

PLAN FOR SHIELDALLOY METALLURGICAL CORP.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the opportunity to request a hearing on a

decommissioning plan submitted by Shieldalloy Metalurgical Corp. for its facility in Newfield, N.J.

The Newfield facility conducted smelting and alloy production from 1940 through 2001. The

facility processed pyrochlore, which contains uranium and thorium and is subject to NRC licensing

requirements. Shieldalloy has proposed decommissioning under restricted use, as provided for in NRC

regulations (10 CFR 20.1403). The company’s proposed approach is to use a possession-only license

for long-term control, which would allow some radioactive material to remain on the site with

restrictions imposed on the site’s use and engineered barriers employed to meet NRC’s requirements

for protecting public health and safety and the environment.

The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the

agency to begin its detailed technical review. Beginning this review does not preclude requesting

additional information as the review proceeds; nor does it indicate whether the Commission will

approve the application.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing was published today in the Federal Register. The

deadline for requesting a hearing is Jan. 16. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest may be

affected by the decommissioning plan and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding. 

NRC staff will conduct two public meetings, Dec. 5 and Dec. 12, in the vicinity of the Newfield

site to discuss the decommissioning process and the scope of the agency’s environmental review for

the license amendment application. More information about those meetings is contained in the Federal

Register notice, and an additional announcement will be made closer to the date.

A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of

the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Requests may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101

or e-mail to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov . A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of

General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov .
Shieldalloy’s decommissioning plan is available on the NRC Web site through its ADAMS

document system, at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , using docket number

04007102.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 8001.101 General. ( a ) *Purpose.* In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to the employees of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA or Agency), and the employees of the Pretrial Services Agency (PSA or Agency), an independent entity within CSOSA. The regulations in this part supplement the Standards of Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635.
( b ) *Cross-references.* In addition to 5 CFR part 2635 and this part, CSOSA and PSA employees are subject to the executive branch financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634, the regulations concerning executive branch financial interest contained in 5 CFR part 2640, and the regulations concerning executive branch employee responsibilities and conduct contained in 5 CFR part 735.
---

Exhibit 14.1

|JUNE FITZMARTYN              
|-----------------------------
|CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT         
|#300 - 2600 GRANVILLE STREET,
|VANCOUVER, B. C. V6H 3V3     

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
  FIRM

We consent to the use of our report dated October
  16, 2003 on the consolidated financial statements of Teryl Resources Corp. as
  at May 31, 2003 and 2002, and for the years ended May 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001
  that are included in the Company's annual report 20-F filing.

|Vancouver, Canada | /s/ June Fitzmartyn  
|----------------- | ---------------------
|July 23, 2007     | Chartered Accountants

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Pinello, Respondent, against George Leadbitter, as Chief of Police of the City of Poughkeepsie, Respondent. The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

No opinion. Cars-well, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [194 Misc. 481.]
§ 551.421 Regular working hours. ( a ) Under the Act there is no requirement that a Federal employee have a regularly scheduled administrative workweek. However, under title 5 United States Code, and part 610 of this chapter, the head of an agency is required to establish work schedules for his or her employees. In determining what activities constitute hours of work under the Act, there is generally a distinction based on whether the activity is performed by an employee during regular working hours or outside regular working hours. For purposes of this part, “regular working hours” means the days and hours of an employee's regularly scheduled administrative workweek established under part 610 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[45 FR 85664, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 36806, Aug. 15, 1983]
NOV 2 6 2002

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Yakima Valley Rail & Steam Museum

d/b/a Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad

Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the continuing status of the Yakima Valley Rail & Steam Museum d/b/a

Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad (TSW) (B.A. No. 2645) and the

new status of Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad, Inc. (TSWI) as an

employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seep)

(RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351,

et seq.) (RUIA). TSW was ruled to be an employer under the RRA and

RUIA effective October 18, 1993. TSWI has not heretofore been ruled to

be an employer under the Acts.

On April 1, 2002, TSWI was created as an independent, for-profit

corporate entity. On April 1, 2002, all TSW employees became TSWI

employees and TSW ceased to exist. TSWI performs the same freight

operations which TSW performed. Board records show that the Yakima

Valley Rail and Steam Museum was the parent corporation and its

subsidiary was the Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad. The

museum operations were ruled to be not covered under the RRA and

RUIA. However, the freight operations of its subsidiary were

segregated from the non-carrier operations of the museum and ruled to

be a covered employer under the RRA and RUIA. (B.C.D. 97-52). The

reason for this change from a segregated subsidiary unit of a noncarrier parent company to an independent corporation was because the

museum’s non-profit status as an educational and preservation

corporation was in jeopardy due to its unrelated business income from

the freight operation.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

BA# 2645
Yakima Valley Rail & Steam Museum

d/b/a Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad

Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad, Inc.

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of

the Surface Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle

IV of Title 49 [45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(l)(i)].

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Act (45 U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same

definition, as does section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax

Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

Based on the information summarized above, it is determined that

Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad, Inc., became an employer

covered under the Railroad Retirement Act and the Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act on April 1, 2002, the date it began

operations. Toppenish, Simcoe & Western Railroad (B.A. No.

2645) ceased to be an employer covered under the Acts

administered by the Board on April 1, 2002, the date on which it

ceased its operations and became nonexistent.

Cherry1/T. Thomas
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1308

MOHAMED MOCTAR HIMA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARCIE GUNNEL, Supervisor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Lydia Kay Griggsby, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01251-LKG)

Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohamed Moctar Hima, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Joseph Kresslein, JACKSON LEWIS 

PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1308 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Mohamed Moctar Hima appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Marci 

Gunnel’s motion to dismiss Hima’s claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights 

Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and denying Hima’s motion to amend his 

previously amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Hima v. Gunnel, No. 1:21-cv01251-LKG (D. Md. Mar. 16, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1308 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the Annual  Report of the Fund on Form  10-K/A for the year ended  December
     31, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  June 30, 2004


                              /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                              -------------------------
                              Michelle A. Alexander
                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Teryl Resources Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jane He, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 4, 2011 /s/  Jane He Jane He, Chief Financial Officer
M e m o r a n d u m

U n it e d St a t e s G o v e r n m e n t FORM G-11M (142)

R a il r o a d R e t ir e m e n t Bo a r d

November 13,2002

L-2002-14

TO : Kenneth P. Boehne 

Chief Financial Officer

FROM : Steven A. B 

General Cc

SUBJECT : Proper Fiscal Year Appropriation to be Charged

In the Conversion of Compensatory Time to Overtime Pay

This is in response to your memorandum dated October 17, 2002, wherein you 

requested my opinion as to whether overtime work performed in a prior fiscal 

year should be charged to that prior fiscal year's appropriation. A Board 

employee worked overtime in Fiscal Year 2002. That employee was 

compensated with compensatory time in accord with 5 U.S.C § 5543. After the 

end of the fiscal year, a request was made to pay that individual overtime pay 

in accord with 5 U.S.C. § 5542, in lieu of the compensatory time previously 

granted that had not been used. A request for similar conversions, that was 

granted, had been made for other employees before the end of the fiscal year. 

This one request was inadvertently left off of the prior request.

In determining what fiscal year's appropriation should be charged, we must 

seek guidance in the decisions of the Comptroller General. The Comptroller 

General has ruled that the appropriation for the fiscal year during which the 

work is actually performed is the proper fiscal year to be charged for 

compensation for that work. See 24 Comp. Gen 676, 678 (1945) and 38 Comp. 

Gen 316,319 (1958). Opinions of the Comptroller General have also held that 

the obligation to pay for overtime compensation is not extinguished until the
- 2-

compensatory time off is in fact granted. See B-l 59597,1966 U.S. Comp. Gen. 

LEXIS 1905 (August 2,1966) and B-183751, 1975 U.S. Comp. Gen LEXIS 1693 

(October 3,1975). See also the decision of the Office of General Counsel of the 

Office of Personnel Management, OPM Case Number S9700856 (December 2, 

1997). Since the obligation to pay the overtime worked was not extinguished 

until the compensatory time off was actually used, the obligation to make the 

payment for the overtime worked in Fiscal Year 2002 remained in effect.

In conclusion, the work for which the person is to be compensated was 

performed during fiscal year 2002; therefore, the appropriation for that fiscal 

year should be charged for the compensation that will be paid to the employee 

in fiscal year 2003.

A A

l:V MISC\money7771.doc
### §10425. Evaluation

Each State that receives a grant under this subchapter shall submit to the Attorney General an evaluation not later than March 1 of each year in such form and containing such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1905, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §32101(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1900.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ff–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Qlante 


1ftoran 


Sb 

March 19,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washingtpn" DC £Q~Q___ ~_~..___~ _.. ' 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

On behalfof Plante & Moran, PLLC, I am writing to express our strong support for th~ 

application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many 

corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese 

companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to 

Japan and its market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has created demand for 

increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience of flying 

into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. 

Indianapolis does not offer international service to Asia, and many ofour business 

travelers use Detroit as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful 

gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is 

adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to 

make it the airline's gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that 

would clearly benefit our region. 

Thank you for consideration of this request. 

illinois Chicago· Elgin Michigan Ann Arbor· Aubum Hills· Detroit • East Lansing Praxiij/: Flint· Grand Rapids· Kalamazoo· Macomb· St. Joseph· Southfield· Traverse City .' . MEMIER tl* 

GLO I Al ALLIANCE Of Ohio Cleveland· Columbus· Toledo China Shanghai. Mexico Monterrey plantemoran.com IllOEPEIiOENT FIllMS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1426
SIDNEY T. LEWIS, Executor and Heir of Estate of Bettie Hamilton, In Re: The Estate of Ida B. Yancey; TIMOTHY CONLEY, In Re: Heir of Estate of Ida B. Yancey; ARNESHIA A. BAKER, In Re: Heir of Estate of Ida B. Yancey, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus EMIGRANTS MORTGAGE COMPANY; PHILIP L. MCGRORY; EMIGRANTS SAVINGS BANK; WENDY ALFORD, Vice President, Emigrants Savings Bank, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA01-1585-DKC) Submitted: June 20, 2002 Decided: June 25, 2002 Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Sidney T. Lewis, Timothy Conley, Arneshia A. Baker, Appellants Pro Se. John Henry Zink, III, Daniel Patrick Moylan, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sidney Lewis, Timothy Conley, and Arneshia A. Baker appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendants in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Emigrants Mortgage Co. , No. CA-01-1585-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2002). Appellants’ motion for a mediation conference is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT  32.1
-------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In  connection  with  the  Amended Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William  G.  Forhan,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and

2)   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  Report.


Date:  November  15,  2004                 /s/  WILLIAM G. FORHAN
                                           ----------------------
                                           WILLIAM G. FORHAN
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer