alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1/Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 16, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Stan Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Stan CipkowskiStan CipkowskiChief Executive Officer/Interim Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer/Principal Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting OfficerMay 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.1

ADHEREX TECHNOLOGIES INC

CERTIFICATION

I, Rostislav Raykov, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Adherex Technologies Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to filing this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and

(c)

Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation date;

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and quarterly report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;

6.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 28, 2009

| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ Rostivlav Raykov   
| |     | Rostislav Raykov       
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
# L_2016161EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/1

---

Information concerning the signature of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an Association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The above Protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon was signed on 28 April 2016 in Brussels.

---
§ 2412.9 Requests for amendment or correction of records. ( a ) Unless the record is not subject to amendment or correction as stated in paragraph (b) of this section, you may make a request for amendment or correction of an Authority, General Counsel, IG, or Panel record about yourself or about an individual for whom you are a parent or guardian by submitting a written request to the FLRA's Solicitor or IG, as appropriate, following the procedures in § 2412.5. Your request should identify each particular record in question, state the amendment or correction that you want, and state why you believe that the record is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete. Please note that a requester bears the burden of proving by the preponderance of the evidence that information is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete. You may submit any documentation that you think would be helpful. If you believe that the same record is in more than one system of records, your request should state that.
( b ) The following records are not subject to amendment or correction: ( 1 ) Transcripts of testimony given under oath or written statements made under oath;
( 2 ) Transcripts of grand jury proceedings, judicial proceedings, or quasi-judicial proceedings, which are the official record of those proceedings;
( 3 ) Records in systems of records that have been exempted from amendment and correction under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) or (k), by notice published in the Federal Register; and
( 4 ) Records compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action or proceeding.
§ 534.407 Pay computation and aggregate compensation. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, pay for members of the SES must be computed in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5504(b).
( b ) To determine the hourly rate of pay for members of the SES, divide the annual SES rate of basic pay by 2,087 and round to the nearest cent, counting one-half cent and over as a whole cent. To derive the biweekly rate, multiply the hourly rate by 80.
( c ) Senior executives are subject to the applicable aggregate limitation on pay in 5 CFR part 530, subpart B.
[69 FR 70367, Dec. 6, 2004]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-00-63 August 23, 2000

CONTACT: Diane Screnci (610)337-5330/ e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan (610)337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON

CHANGES IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROGRAM AT GINNA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a public meeting for Wednesday, August

30, in Ontario, N.Y., to discuss the agency’s new reactor oversight process. The Robert E. Ginna

Nuclear Plant, one of the nation’s 103 operating commercial nuclear power plants, is located in

Ontario.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m., at the Ontario Golf Club, 2101 Country Club Lane.

Members of the public will have the opportunity to ask questions of NRC staff during and after the

meeting.

The new oversight process, which began at Ginna in April, uses more objective, timely and

safety-significant criteria in assessing performance while seeking to more effectively and efficiently

regulate the industry. Under the new process, inspections by NRC resident inspectors and regional

office-based personnel are supplemented by statistical measures of plant activities called performance

indicators. These performance indicators measure important safety aspects of plant operations,

including the viability of redundant safety systems, emergency planning, radiation protection and

security measures.

Inspection findings and performance indicators for each nuclear power plant are posted on the

NRC’s web site every three months. The safety significance of each inspection finding or performance

indicator is characterized by a color -- green, white, yellow or red.

The NRC response to the inspection finding and performance indicators will be based on the

significance of the items. A green finding receives normal NRC oversight, while white, yellow or red

assessments receive increasing NRC involvement. Multiple red findings could result in a plant

shutdown.

A plain language summary of the reactor oversight process is available from the NRC Office of

Public Affairs or on the web site at: www.nrc.gov/OPA/primer.htm . Detailed information regarding

the reactor oversight process is available at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html .

#
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EdwardM. Krell, Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| **/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL**                             |     |     |
|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|----------|
| Edward M. Krell                                     |     |     |
| *Executive Vice President-Chief  Financial Officer* | * * | * * |
| August 9, 2006                                      |     |     |
|                                                     |          |          |  |  |

 

----
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### May 5, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
TENTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY C. KENNEY, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Defendant - Appellee. No. 15-6021 (D.C. No. 5:14-CV-00463-M) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before GORSUCH , McKAY, and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

After Anthony Kenney filed a drove of frivolous lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, that court imposed certain restrictions on his ability to bring additional actions before it. In an apparent attempt to circumvent those restrictions, Mr. Kenney set his sights on a new jurisdiction and filed this suit in the neighboring Western District. After a

* After examining Mr. Kenney’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.magistrate judge granted his motion to proceed in forma pauperis , the district court dismissed Mr. Kenney’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), which requires courts to dismiss in forma pauperis actions that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted.” Id. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We discern no error in that disposition and so we affirm the district court’s judgment. Though Mr. Kenney’s complaint appears to allege that Oklahoma failed to pay him workers’ compensation benefits, it fails to set forth factual allegations from which we might infer some plausible basis for relief. Mr. Kenney, who has brought more than twenty appeals before this court, should be on notice too that any future frivolous, malicious, or abusive filings will put him at the risk of sanctions, including possible filing restrictions in this court. See Ford v. Pryor , 552 F.3d 1174, 1181 (10th Cir. 2008) (noting our inherent authority to impose “comprehensive filing restrictions on litigants who have repeatedly abused the appellate process”).

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge

- 2 -
### §50112. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Assistance in form of funds

There is authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 for each fiscal year ending after September 30, 2022, to provide under this chapter Federal law enforcement assistance in the form of funds.

#### (b) Assistance other than funds

There are authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year ending after September 30, 1984, such sums as may be necessary to provide under this chapter Federal law enforcement assistance other than funds.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609Y, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2107; Pub. L. 114–198, title II, §201(b), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 115–401, §3, Dec. 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 5342.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 10513 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–401 substituted "September 30, 2022" for "September 30, 2021".

2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–198 substituted "September 30, 2021" for "September 30, 1984".
#### § 330.105 Instructions on how to add a vacancy announcement to USAJOBS.

An agency can find the instructions to add a vacancy announcement to USAJOBS on OPM's Web site at *http://www.usajobs.gov.* An electronic file of the complete vacancy announcement must be included within USAJOBS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors and Subcommittee Meetings.

# TIME AND DATE:

The meetings will occur on the following schedule and will take place in the Eastern (Standard) Time Zone:

## Monday, January 28, 2019

9:00 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Procedures Subcommittee

9:50 a.m.-10:45 a.m. Audit Subcommittee

11:00 a.m.-12:00 Noon Finance Subcommittee

1:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m. Registration System Subcommittee

3:15 p.m.-4:15 p.m. Industry Advisory Subcommittee

4:15 p.m.-5:00 p.m. Dispute Resolution Subcommittee

## Tuesday, January 29, 2019

The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. until noon.

# PLACE:

These meetings will be open to the public at the Embassy Suites, Tampa Downtown Convention Center, 513 South Florida Ave., Tampa, FL 33602, and via conference call. Those not attending the meetings in person may call toll-free; 1-866-210-1669, passcode 5253902#, to listen and participate in the meetings.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board. An agenda for these meetings will be available no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, January 18, 2019 at:                         *https://ucrplan.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

Issued on: December 11, 2018.

Larry W. Minor, 

 Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.

[FR Doc. 2018-27775 Filed 12-18-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
### §10703. Review of applications

The Attorney General shall not finally disapprove any application (or any amendment to that application) submitted under this subchapter without first affording the applicant reasonable notice of any deficiencies in the application and an opportunity for correction of any such deficiencies and reconsideration.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3023, as added Pub. L. 114–198, title II, §201(a)(1), July 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 713.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797ff–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 630.1103 Establishment of an emergency leave transfer program. ( a ) When directed by the President, OPM will establish an emergency leave transfer program that permits an employee to donate his or her accrued annual leave to employees of the same or other agencies who are adversely affected by a disaster or emergency as defined in § 630.1102. In certain situations, OPM may delegate to an agency the authority to establish an emergency leave transfer program.
( b ) OPM will notify agencies of the establishment of an emergency leave transfer program for a specific disaster or emergency, as declared by the President. Once notified, each agency affected by the disaster or emergency is authorized to do the following: ( 1 ) Determine whether, and how much, donated annual leave is needed by affected employees;
( 2 ) Approve emergency leave donors and/or emergency leave recipients within the agency, as appropriate;
( 3 ) Facilitate the distribution of donated annual leave from approved emergency leave donors to approved emergency leave recipients within the agency; and
( 4 ) Determine the period of time for which donated annual leave may be accepted for distribution to approved emergency leave recipients.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-008 March 24, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nuclear

Management Company on Thursday, March 31, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety

performance for the year 2004 at the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located at Covert,

MI.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m.

at the Guesthouse International Lighthouse Inn, 2320 Phoenix Rd, South Haven, MI

Before the meeting is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the Palisades plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe

plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Palisades plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/pali_2004q4.pdf

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Palisades plant operated safely during the period. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Palisades during 2004 were

determined to be “green.” As a result of this performance, the NRC will conduct the normal, baseline

level of inspections during the upcoming year.
-2-

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, IL, and the agency’s headquarters in

Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant operations to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are

emergency preparedness, maintenance, safety system performance, and radiological safety.

Current performance information for Palisades is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALI/pali_chart.html

###
Order entered March 17 , 2020

In t he 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 19
- 01239
- CV
IN RE EDUKID, LP , Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 7 Collin Co unty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 007
- 01603
- 2017 

### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT the petition for a writ of mandamus as to both the trial court’s September 27, 2019 “Or der on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Edukid’s Opinion Testimony Witness Designation for Failure to Designate as an Expert Witness and Provide an Adequate Expert Report” (the Exclusion Order) and its September 27, 2019 “Order Denying Defendant Edukid’s Motio n for Protective Order and Motion to Quash” (the Denial Order).
We ORDER the trial court to issue a written ruling , within thirty days of the date of this Order, that : (1) vacat es the Exclusion Order in its entirety; (2) vacat es the portion of the Denial
O rder denying Edukid’s motion for a protective order to the extent it deals with deposition questions concerning the opinions of testifying experts; and (3) grants Edukid’s motion for a protective order to the extent the deposition of Edukid’s corporate rep resentative may not includequestions concerning the opinions of testifying experts. We further ORDER the trial court to file with this Court, within thirty

- five days of the date of this Order , a certified copy of its written ruling evidencing such complia nce. Should the trial court fail to comply with this Order, the writ will issue. We LIFT this Court’s October 17, 2019 stay of trial

- court proceedings. /s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
### **CHAPTER 35—DEFINITIONS**

Sec.
351.
Definitions.