Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 57267 

stakeholder organizations to build 

innovative dissemination strategies. The 

Partnership Project has developed and 

enhanced tools and strategies to 

improve the collaboration and 

engagement of stakeholder organizations 

linked with State improvement efforts to 

implement evidence-based practices, 

improve the implementation of IDEA, 

and improve outcomes for children with 

disabilities within general education 

reform efforts. Engagement tools and 

strategies include: (1) Various Dialogue 

Guides, focused on education reform 

efforts such as standards-based 

assessment, college- and careerreadiness, and the school-to-prison 

pipeline; (2) communities of practice 

development and implementation; and 

(3) stakeholder engagement protocols. 

At this time, we do not believe that it 

would be in the public interest to run 

a competition for a new Partnership 

Project because the Department is 

planning to change the organization of 

its technical assistance (TA) activities to 

better meet the needs of States and local 

affiliates and families. We also have 

concluded that it would be contrary to 

the public interest to have a lapse in the 

provision of the TA services currently 

provided by the Partnership Project 

pending the changes to the organization 

of the Department’s TA activities. 

For these reasons, the Secretary 

waives the requirements in 34 CFR 

75.250, which prohibit project periods 

exceeding five years, and waives the 

requirements in 34 CFR 75.261(a) and 

(c)(2), which allow the extension of a 

project period only if the extension does 

not involve the obligation of additional 

Federal funds. The waiver allows the 

Department to issue a continuation 

award in the amount of $1,699,000 to 

NASDSE for an additional 12-month 

period. This continuation award should 

ensure that the Partnership Project’s TA, 

coordinated training, outreach, and 

dissemination of information to the 

partners’ State and local affiliates and 

families will not be interrupted. 

Any activities to be carried out during 

the year of the continuation award 

would have to be consistent with, or be 

a logical extension of, the scope, goals, 

and objectives of the grantee’s 

application as approved in the 2008 

Partnership Project competition. 

The requirements applicable to 

continuation awards for this 

competition set forth in the July 15, 

2008, notice inviting applications and 

the requirements in 34 CFR 75.253 

apply to any continuation awards 

sought by the current IDEA Partnership 

grantee. We base our decisions 

regarding a continuation award on the 

program narrative, budget, budget 

narrative, and program performance 

report submitted by the current grantee, 

as well as the requirements in 34 CFR 

75.253. 

Waiver of Delayed Effective Date 

The Administrative Procedure Act 

requires that a substantive rule must be 

published at least 30 days before its 

effective date, except as otherwise 

provided for good cause (5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(3)). We received no substantive 

comments on the proposed waiver and 

extension of project period, and we have 

not made any substantive changes to the 

proposed waiver and extension of 

project period. The Secretary has made 

a determination to waive the delayed 

effective date to ensure provision of TA 

services currently provided by the 

Partnership Project pending the changes 

to the organization of the Department’s 

TA activities. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

The Secretary certifies that this 

waiver and extension of the project 

period would not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

The only entity that would be affected 

by this waiver and extension of the 

project period is the current grantee. 

The Secretary certifies that this 

waiver and final extension would not 

have a significant economic impact on 

this entity because the extension of an 

existing project imposes minimal 

compliance costs, and the activities 

required to support the additional year 

of funding would not impose additional 

regulatory burdens or require 

unnecessary Federal supervision. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

This notice of final waiver and 

extension of the project period does not 

contain any information collection 

requirements. 

Intergovernmental Review 

This program is subject to Executive 

Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 

CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the 

Executive order is to foster an 

intergovernmental partnership and a 

strengthened federalism. The Executive 

order relies on processes developed by 

State and local governments for 

coordination and review of proposed 

Federal financial assistance. This 

document provides early notification of 

our specific plans and actions for this 

program. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 

request to the contact person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: September 13, 2013. 

Sue Swenson, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services, 

delegated the authority to perform the 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2013–22715 Filed 9–17–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0511; FRL–9901–01– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri; Conformity of General 

Federal Actions to State 

Implementation Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by 

the state of Missouri on August 12, 

2011. This revision will update the state 

general conformity rule in its entirety to 

bring in into compliance with the 

Federal general conformity rule which 

was updated in the Federal Register on 

April 5, 2010. General conformity 

regulations prohibit Federal agencies 

from taking actions that may cause or 

contribute to violations of the National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). This rule applies to nonVerDate Mar<15>2010 15:23 Sep 17, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18SER1.SGM 18SER1

pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
57268 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

attainment and maintenance areas of the 

state. The revision to Missouri’s rule 

does not have an adverse affect on air 

quality. EPA’s approval of this SIP 

revision is being done in accordance 

with the requirements of the Clean Air 

Act (CAA). 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective November 18, 2013, without 

further notice, unless EPA receives 

adverse comment by October 18, 2013. 

If EPA receives adverse comment, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2013–0511, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Amy 

Bhesania, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013– 

0511. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

legal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania at (913) 551–7147, or by 

email at bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is approving the revision to the 

Missouri SIP submitted to EPA on 

August 12, 2011. Missouri’s revision 

amends rule 10 CSR 10–6.300 

Conformity of General Federal Actions 

to State Implementation Plans, which 

updates the state general conformity 

This revision will update the state 

general conformity rule in its entirety to 

bring it into compliance with the 

amended Federal general conformity 

rule. EPA has conducted an analysis of 

the State’s amendments and has 

concluded that these revisions do not 

adversely affect the stringency of the SIP 

or adversely impact air quality. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. In addition, the revision 

meets the substantive SIP requirements 

of the CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving the revision to the 

Missouri SIP by approving the State’s 

request to amend 10 CSR 10–6.300 

Conformity of General Federal Actions 

to State Implementation Plans. 

Conformity of General Federal Actions 

prohibits Federal agencies from taking 

actions that may cause or contribute to 

violations of the National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS). This 

amendment improves the process 

entities use to demonstrate their actions 

will not contribute to a NAAQS 

violation, provides tools to encourage 

better communication and air quality 

planning between the state and Federal 

agencies, and encourages both Federal 

agencies and states to take early action 

to ensure projects will conform to SIPs. 

This rule applies to non-attainment and 

maintenance areas of the state. There are 

two revisions in the state rule that differ 

from the Federal rule. In 10 CSR 10– 

6.300 (3)(F)1.A. ‘‘Procedures for 

Conformity Determinations of General 

Federal Actions,’’ the state has added 

that planning assumptions must be 

derived from estimates of current, as 

well as, future population. The second 

revision that differs from the Federal 

rule is in 10 CSR 10–6.300 (3)(G)1, 

‘‘Mitigation of Air Quality Impacts.’’ 

Language has been added that includes 

the identification and quantification of 

all emission reductions claimed for 

measures intended to mitigate air 

quality. In the same paragraph, language 

has been added that the process for 

implementation of these measures 

should include any necessary funding 

and tracking of emissions reductions. 

EPA has determined that these changes 

will not relax the SIP or adversely 

impact air quality. 

We are processing this action as a 

direct final action because the revisions 

do not adversely impact air quality, and 

we do not anticipate any adverse 

comments. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on part of 

this rule and if that part can be severed 

from the remainder of the rule, EPA may 

adopt as final those parts of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 57269 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by November 18, 2013. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: August 16, 2013. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

■ 2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry for 

10–6.300 to read as follows: 

§ 52.1320 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS

Missouri citation Title State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

*******

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of 

Missouri 

*******

10–6.300 ................................. Conformity of General Federal Actions to State Implementation Plans.07/31/11 09/18/13 [Insert Federal Register page number where 

the document begins].

10–6.300(3)(F)1.A and 10– 

6.300(3)(G)1 includes language that differs from the 

Federal rule. 

*******


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
57270 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–22619 Filed 9–17–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0868; EPA–R05– 

OAR–2012–0463; FRL–9900–92–Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 

Redesignation of the Cleveland-AkronLorain Area to Attainment of the 1997 

Annual Standard and 2006 24-Hour 

Standard for Fine Particulate Matter 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: As Ohio requested, EPA is 

redesignating the Cleveland-AkronLorain, Ohio nonattainment area 

(Cleveland area) to attainment for the 

1997 annual and 2006 24-hour National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS or standards) for fine 

particulate matter (PM2.5) because the 

area meets the statutory requirements 

for redesignation under the Clean Air 

Act (CAA). The Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) 

submitted these requests to EPA on 

October 11, 2011, and May 30, 2012, 

and supplemented them on April 30, 

2013. EPA is also taking several related 

actions. EPA is making a determination 

that the Cleveland area attained the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard by its 

attainment date and that the area 

continues to attain both the 1997 annual 

and 2006 24-hour standards. EPA is 

approving, as revisions to the Ohio State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), the state’s 

plans for maintaining the 1997 annual 

and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS 

through 2023 in the area. EPA is 

approving the comprehensive emissions 

inventories submitted by Ohio EPA for 

nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide 

(SO2), primary PM2.5, volatile organic 

compounds (VOC), and ammonia as 

meeting the requirements of the CAA. 

Finally, EPA finds adequate and is 

approving Ohio’s NOX and PM2.5 Motor 

Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs) for 

2015 and 2022 for the Cleveland area. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

September 18, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established dockets 

for these actions under Docket ID Nos. 

EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0868 and EPA– 

R05–OAR–2012–0463. All documents in 

the docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 

Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This 

facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 

p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 

Federal holidays. We recommend that 

you telephone Kathleen D’Agostino, 

Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886– 

1767 before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental 

Engineer, Attainment Planning and 

Maintenance Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 

Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 

60604, (312) 886–1767, 

dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is the background for the actions? 

II. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is the background for the 

actions? 

On September 14, 2011, at 76 FR 

56641, EPA issued a final determination 

that the Cleveland area attained the 

1997 annual PM2.5 standard by the 

applicable attainment date of April 5, 

2010, based on certified ambient 

monitoring data for the 2007–2009 

monitoring period. On October 5, 2011, 

Ohio EPA submitted its request to 

redesignate the Cleveland 

nonattainment area to attainment for the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, and for EPA 

approval of the SIP revision containing 

an emissions inventory, maintenance 

plan, and MVEBs for the area. On May 

30, 2012, Ohio EPA submitted a similar 

request for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

standard. In a supplemental submission 

to EPA on April 30, 2013, Ohio 

provided ammonia and VOC emissions 

inventories to supplement the 

comprehensive emissions inventories 

submitted as part of the redesignation 

requests. 

On July 26, 2013, EPA published a 

rule in the Federal Register (78 FR 

45116) proposing to determine that the 

Cleveland area continues to attain the 

1997 annual standard and is attaining 

the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, and 

that the area has met the requirements 

for redesignation under section 

107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA received 

one comment letter in support of the 

redesignation action, submitted on 

behalf of the Ohio Utility Group. EPA 

received no adverse comments on the 

proposal. 

II. Why is EPA taking these actions? 

EPA has determined that the 

Cleveland area continues to attain the 

1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and that the 

area has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS by its applicable attainment 

date. EPA has also determined that all 

other criteria have been met for the 

redesignation of the Cleveland area from 

nonattainment to attainment of the 1997 

annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS 

and for approval of Ohio’s maintenance 

plans for the area. See CAA sections 

107(d)(3)(E) and 175A. The detailed 

rationale for EPA’s findings and actions 

is set forth in the proposed rule of July 

26, 2013, (78 FR 45116). 

III. Final Action 

EPA is making a determination that 

the Cleveland area continues to attain 

the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard and that 

the area attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

standard by its attainment date and 

continues to attain that standard. EPA is 

determining that the area has met the 

requirements for redesignation under 

section 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the 

CAA. EPA is thus changing the legal 

designation of the Cleveland area from 

nonattainment to attainment for the 

1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5

NAAQS. EPA is also approving Ohio’s 

PM2.5 maintenance plans for the 

Cleveland area as revisions to the Ohio 

SIP because the plans meet the 

requirements of section 175A of the 

CAA. EPA is approving 2005 and 2008 

emissions inventories for primary PM2.5, 

NOX, and SO2, and 2007/2008 emission 

inventories for VOC and ammonia as 

satisfying the requirement in section 

172(c)(3) of the CAA for a 

comprehensive, current emission 

inventory. Finally, EPA finds adequate 

and is approving 2015 and 2022 primary 

PM2.5 and NOX MVEBs for the 

Cleveland area. These MVEBs will be 

used in future transportation conformity 

analyses for the area. 

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), 

EPA finds there is good cause for these 

actions to become effective immediately 

upon publication. This is because a 

delayed effective date is unnecessary 

due to the nature of a redesignation to 

attainment, which relieves the area from 

certain CAA requirements that would 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES