alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony N. DeMint,
certify that:



1. I have
		reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of YFC 355 Corp.;
2. Based on
		my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
		of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
		the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
		statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
		by this report;
3. Based on
		my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
		included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
		the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
		small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
		annual report;
4. I am the
		sole officer and director and I am responsible for establishing and
		maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
		Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
		have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
> 				disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
> 				supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> 				small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
> 				is made known to me by others within those entities,
> 				particularly during the period in which this report is being
> 				prepared;
> 		Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer
> 				disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
> 				my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
> 				controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
> 				this report based on such evaluation; and
> 		Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
> 				during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
> 				(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
> 				of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
> 				reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. I have
		disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
		financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the
		small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
		equivalent functions):

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> 				design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
> 				which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
> 				business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
> 				report financial information; and
> 		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
> 				other employees who have a significant role in the small
> 				business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 7,
2005





/s/ Anthony N. DeMint_________

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief Accounting
Officer
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF YANZHOU COAL MINING COMPANY LIMITED

As of May 31, 2010, we owned the following subsidiaries:



|                                                 |  |                                                    
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                               |  | Country of incorporation/ registrationand
operation
|Austar Coal Mine Pty Limited                     |  | Australia                                          
|Felix Resources Limited                          |  | Australia                                          
|Qingdao Free Trade Zone Zhongyan Trade Co., Ltd. |  | PRC                                                
|Shandong Hua Ju Energy Co., Limited              |  | PRC                                                
|Shandong Yanmei Shipping Co., Ltd.               |  | PRC                                                
|Shanxi Heshun Tianchi Energy Company Limited     |  | PRC                                                
|Shanxi Tianhao Chemicals Co., Ltd.               |  | PRC                                                
|Yancoal Australia Pty Limited                    |  | Australia                                          
|Yankuang Shanxi Nenghua Co., Ltd.                |  | PRC                                                
|Yanmei Heze Nenghua Company Limited              |  | PRC                                                
|Yanzhou Coal Ordos Nenghua Company Limited       |  | PRC                                                
|Yanzhou Coal Yulin Nenghua Company Limited       |  | PRC
#### The Bank of the United States, Respondent, v. The Public Bank of New York City, Appellant.

Determination affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KASHIF OMAR ELLIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 274 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### §12410. Definitions

As used in this part—

(1) the term "national crime information databases" refers to the National Crime Information Center and its incorporated criminal history databases, including the Interstate Identification Index; and

(2) the term "protection order" includes an injunction or any other order issued for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts or harassment against, or contact or communication with or physical proximity to, another person, including temporary and final orders issued by civil or criminal courts (other than support or child custody orders) whether obtained by filing an independent action or as a pendente lite order in another proceeding so long as any civil order was issued in response to a complaint, petition, or motion filed by or on behalf of a person seeking protection.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40611, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1952.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14040 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00431-CR

__________________

JOHN WESLEY HARDIN III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 163rd District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B150077-R

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

John Wesley Hardin III has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and 

joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is 

granted, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM
2

Submitted on January 7, 2020

Opinion Delivered January 8, 2020

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
### §702m. Interest of Members of Congress in contracts for acquisition of land

In every contract or agreement to be made or entered into for the acquisition of land either by private sale or condemnation as in sections 702a, 702b to 702d, 702e to 702g, 702h, 702i, 702j, 702k, 702l, 702m, and 704 of this title provided the provisions contained in section 6306(a) of title 41 shall be applicable.

(May 15, 1928, ch. 569, §14, 45 Stat. 539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "section 6306(a)" substituted for "section 3741 of the Revised Statutes being section 22 of title 41 of the United States Code" on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.
§ 610.121 Establishment of work schedules. ( a ) Except when the head of an agency determines that the agency would be seriously handicapped in carrying out its functions or that costs would be substantially increased, he or she shall provide that— ( 1 ) Assignments to tours of duty are scheduled in advance of the administrative workweek over periods of not less than 1 week;
( 2 ) The basic 40-hour workweek is scheduled on 5 days, Monday through Friday when possible, and the 2 days outside the basic workweek are consecutive;
( 3 ) The working hours in each day in the basic workweek are the same;
( 4 ) The basic nonovertime workday may not exceed 8 hours;
( 5 ) The occurrence of holidays may not affect the designation of the basic workweek; and
( 6 ) Breaks in working hours of more than 1 hour may not be scheduled in a basic workday.
( b ) ( 1 ) The head of an agency shall schedule the work of his or her employees to accomplish the mission of the agency. The head of an agency shall schedule an employee's regularly scheduled administrative workweek so that it corresponds with the employee's actual work requirements.
( 2 ) When the head of an agency knows in advance of an administrative workweek that the specific days and/or hours of a day actually required of an employee in that administrative workweek will differ from those required in the current administrative workweek, he or she shall reschedule the employee's regularly scheduled administrative workweek to correspond with those specific days and hours. The head of the agency shall inform the employee of the change, and he or she shall record the change on the employee's time card or other agency document for recording work.
( 3 ) If it is determined that the head of an agency should have scheduled a period of work as part of the employee's regularly scheduled administrative workweek and failed to do so in accordance with paragraphs (b) (1) and (2) of this section, the employee shall be entitled to the payment of premium pay for that period of work as regularly scheduled work under subpart A of part 550 of this chapter. In this regard, it must be determined that the head of the agency: ( i ) Had knowledge of the specific days and hours of the work requirement in advance of the administrative workweek, and
( ii ) had the opportunity to determine which employee had to be scheduled, or rescheduled, to meet the specific days and hours of that work requirement.
(5 U.S.C. 5548 and 6101(c))
[48 FR 3935, Jan. 28, 1983]
§ 630.211 Exclusion of Presidential appointees. ( a ) *Authority.* ( 1 ) Section 6301(2)(xi) of title 5, United States Code, authorizes the President to exclude certain Presidential appointees in the executive branch or the government of the District of Columbia from the annual and sick leave provisions of subchapter I of chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code, and from the related provisions of this part.
( 2 ) The President, by Executive Order 10540, as amended, has delegated to the Office of Personnel Management the responsibility for making exclusions under section 6301(2)(xi), and the Office of Personnel Management has delegated responsibility to the head of each agency consistent with the provisions of this section.
( 3 ) Presidential appointees in positions where the rate of basic pay is equal to or exceeds the rate for level V of the Executive Schedule are already excluded from the annual and sick leave provisions by 5 U.S.C. 6301(2)(x). Therefore, no further action by an agency is necessary to exclude these appointees.
( b ) *Criteria for exclusions.* The head of an agency may exclude an officer in the agency from the annual and sick leave provisions only if the officer meets all of the following criteria: ( 1 ) The officer is a Presidential appointee;
( 2 ) The officer is not a United States attorney or United States marshal; and
( 3 ) The officer's responsibilities for carrying out the duties of the position continue outside normal duty hours and while away from the normal duty post.
( c ) *Revocation of exclusion.* The head of an agency may revoke an exclusion from the annual and sick leave provisions which was made under this section.
( d ) *Reports.* The head of an agency must report any exclusion, or revocation of an exclusion, authorized under this section to the Office of Personnel Management.
( e ) *Continuation of previous authorizations.* Any officer in an agency who was excluded by action of the President or the Civil Service Commission prior to February 15, 1979, from the annual and sick leave provisions under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 6301(2)(xi) shall continue to be excluded from annual and sick leave unless the exclusion is revoked by the agency under the provisions of this section.
[44 FR 54694, Sept. 21, 1979, as amended at 56 FR 18663, Apr. 23, 1991]
#### Martina Ciciarelli, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. James W. Bixby and Others, Respondents.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.
#### § 576.201 Definitions.

*‘Employment’ means* employment with the Government of the United States, including employment under a personal services contract (or other direct contract) with the United States Government (other than an entity in the legislative branch) unless employed pursuant to § 576.203(a).
### **CHAPTERS 505 THROUGH 599—RESERVED**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(b)(4), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2836, added placeholder for chapters 505 to 599.
### §10331. Function of Director

The Director shall provide funds to eligible States and units of local government pursuant to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1401, as added Pub. L. 101–647, title II, §241(a)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4810.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796aa of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Another section 1401 of Pub. L. 90–351, title IX, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 238, enacted section 3103a of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1401 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2601 and is classified to section 10541 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Effective Aug. 1, 2000, all functions of Director of Bureau of Justice Assistance, other than those enumerated in section 10142(3) to (6) of this title, transferred to Assistant Attorney General for Office of Justice Programs, see section 1000(a)(1) [title I, §108(b)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 10141 of this title.
# L_2016078EN.01000101.xml

| 24.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and Kosovo (*1), of the other part

As the procedures necessary for the entry into force of the abovementioned Agreement have been completed on 26 February 2016, this Agreement enters into force on 1 April 2016, in accordance with its Article 144.

---

(*1)  This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.

*1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.901 Purpose.

This subpart implements section 1203 of the Panama Canal Act of 1979, which provides for the detail or transfer of Federal employees to the Panama Canal Commission with reemployment rights in the former agency.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Herman K. Endemann, Deceased. State Tax Commission, Appellant; Sarah H. Endemann, as Executrix of Herman K. Endemann, Deceased, Respondent.

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 768.]
NRC ANNOUNCES CHIEF OF NEW COMPUTER SECURITY OFFICE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the 

establishment of the Computer Security Office (CSO) and has selected 

Patrick D. Howard as the Chief Information Security Officer to lead 

the new office effective March 17. 

Howard will report to the Deputy Executive Director for 

Information Services and Chief Information Officer, and serve as the 

focal point for information technology (IT) security. He will provide 

vision, leadership, and oversight in developing, promulgating, and 

implementing an agency IT security strategy. This organizational 

change meets the Federal Information Security Management Act 

(FISMA) requirements as they relate to IT security. 

The CSO has three core groups: 1) cyber situational awareness, analysis, and response 

team; 2) FISMA compliance and oversight team; and 3) the policy, standards and training team. 

The current Office of Information Services will remain intact with the exception of the IT 

security-related functions. 

Howard has more than 35 years of experience in the security industry, and has worked in 

the computer security field for the past 16 years. Prior to joining the NRC, he worked as the 

Chief Information Security Officer at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 

(HUD) where he managed HUD’s enterprise-wide IT security program. There he led HUD to a 

first ever “A+” score on Congress’ 2006 FISMA Report Card and was recognized as a 2007 Fed 

100 winner for his accomplishments in government IT. Prior to joining HUD, Howard was 

employed by the Titan Corporation, supporting the Department of Transportation serving as the 

department’s certification and accreditation program manager. 

Howard received a Bachelor of Arts degree in history from the University of Oklahoma 

and a Master of Arts degree in international relations from Boston University. He is a Certified 

Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) and a certified information security 

manager. In addition, Howard is co-author of the Total CISSP Exam Prep Book, and authored 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-055 March 14, 2008
Building and Implementing a Security Certification and Accreditation Program. He is a member 

of the Federal Systems Security Governance Board and the International Information Systems 

Security Certification Consortium’s Government Advisory Board.

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
EXHIBIT 99.1

================================================================================

                    WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the President of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)      the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31,
         2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.


                                               /s/ Ross M. Strickland
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Ross M. Strickland,
                                               President
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
                                               March 20, 2003

                                       35
#### § 353.206 Documentation upon return.

Upon request, a returning employee who was absent for more than 30 days, or was hospitalized or convalescing from an injury or illness incurred in or aggravated during the performance of service in the uniformed services, must provide the agency with documentation that establishes the timeliness of the application for reemployment, and length and character of service. If documentation is unavailable, the agency must restore the employee until documentation becomes available.
Merrimack,

June, 1898.

#### Pattee & *a. v.*Thompson & *a.*

Under P. S., *c.*112, *s.*23, towns have power to appoint agents to enforce the law against the illegal sale of spirituous and malt liquors.

Bill in Equity, by taxpayers of the town of Warner, praying that the defendant Flanders be enjoined from collecting of the-town the expenses incurred by him as its agent to enforce the-liquor laws therein, and that the other defendants, as selectmen and treasurer of the town, be restrained from paying the same.

*Streeter, Walker Hollis,*for the plaintiffs.

*William H. Sawyer*and *Albin, Martin $ Howe,*for the defendants.

Blodgett, J.

The question raised by the case is whether-towns have power to appoint agents to enforce the law against the illegal sale of spirituous and malt liquors, under *s.*23, *c.*112,., P. 8., relating to such liquors, by which it is enacted that “ The-selectmen shall prosecute, at the expense of the town, every person guilty of a violation of any previous section of this chapter, of which they can obtain reasonable proof; and if any selectman shall neglect his duty as specified in this section, he shall be fined not more than two hundred dollars. But this provision shall not-be construed to prevent any person from making complaint, and instituting and carrying on prosecutions for such offences; and such complainant, whether a town or city by its officers, or an individual, shall be entitled to one half of every fine collected-through such prosecution.”

We have no doubt that this question should bo answered in the affirmative, and, moreover, it is in effect so answered in *Northumberland*v. *Coös,*51 N. H. 557, 559, where it was held that a town is entitled to one half the fines in liquor prosecutions instituted and carried on by its agent. In other words, it is our - opinion that the explanatory and qualifying part of *s.*23 is to be - construed as if it read: But this provision shall not be construed to prevent any person, town, or city from making complaint, etc. Taking this to be so, if the selectmen neglect their duty to prosecute, or if for any reason it is deemed desirable, the town may do so; and as towns can act only through agents, they may - of course appoint an agent for that purpose.

*Bill dismissed.*

All concurred.