alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Border Security Technology Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 27, 2018, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Border Security Technology 
Consortium (``BSTC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Advanced Detection Technology, LLC, Mooresville, NC; 
Analogic Corporation, Peabody, MA; Anduril Industries, Inc., Costa 
Mesa, CA; Deloitte Services LP, Arlington, VA; DroneShield LLC, 
Warrenton, VA; Intelligent Automation, Inc., Rockville, MD; Irvine 
Sensors Corporation, Costa Mesa, CA; Manufacturing Techniques, Inc. 
(MTEQ), Lorton, VA; Mason Livesay Scientific dba IB3 Global Solutions, 
Oak Ridge, TN; Megaray LLC, New York, NY; Siemens Postal, Parcel & 
Airport Logistics LLC, DFW Airport, TX; Smart Imaging Systems, Inc., 
Beltsville, MD; Smiths Detection, Inc., Edgewood, MD; SNA International 
(SNA), Alexandria, VA; and SRC, Inc., North Syracuse, NY, have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and BSTC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 30, 2012, BSTC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 18, 
2012 (77 FR 36292).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 21, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 17, 2018 (83 FR 46971).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-27456 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
#### § 532.601 General.

The Office of Personnel Management shall establish a job grading system in accordance with section 5346 of title 5, United States Code. Appropriate instructions to agencies on the application of the job grading system shall be published by the Office of Personnel Management. Agencies are required to grade all jobs subject to this part in accordance with such instructions.
#### § 531.217 Special conversion rules for certain non-GS employees.

When an employee moves (without a break in service) to a GS position from a non-GS system under an authority in 5 U.S.C. chapters 47, 95, or similar provision of law, and that authority provides that an employee will be converted to GS-equivalent rates immediately before leaving the non-GS system, the employee is considered a GS employee in applying the provisions of this subpart.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Alonzo WRIGHT, Appellant.

No. 01-3716.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 14, 2002.

Filed May 20, 2002.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Wright was convicted of robbing an Omaha, Nebraska credit union. Wright appeals the district court’s * denial of his motion for acquittal, contending the evidence was insufficient to identify him as the robber. We review the sufficiency of evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. *United States v. L.B.G.,*131 F.3d 1276, 1277 (8th Cir.1997). The bank teller from whom the robber demanded money testified in court that Wright was the robber. The teller’s uncorroborated testimony alone is a sufficient basis for conviction. *Id.*at 1278. Further, the conviction is supported by numerous pieces of circumstantial evidence. We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Merrimack,

June, 1899.

#### Hood, *Adm’r, Ap’t, v.*Marshall, *Adm’r, & a.*

An appellant from a decree of the probate court may have his appeal dismissed at any time before trial.

In such ease, the sureties upon the bond of the appellee will not be allowed to prosecute the appeal when their interests are adverse to those of the appellant and their reasons of appeal different from his.

Appeal, from a decree of the probate court, ordering Marshall, as administrator of Crippen, to pay over to Hood, as administrator of Lawrence, any balance in his hands belonging to-the estate of Lawrence, of whose estate in his lifetime Crippen was administrator. Facts found by the court.

The appeal was taken in good faith by Hood, who assigned, as reasons for his appeal, insufficiency and ambiguity in the decree. At the term at which it was entered, counsel for Hood marked the case for trial by the court; but before the trial, at the same term, moved for leave to dismiss the appeal. Counsel for the sureties on Crippen’s administration bond, who are the only parties interested adversely to Hood, objected to the dismissal of the appeal, and moved that they be allowed t-o prosecute the same for their protection, upon the ground that they were aggrieved by the decree and intended to appeal therefrom,, and would have appealed except for the appeal taken by Hood ; and for the reason that they were advised and understood that the questions as to which they were aggrieved by the decree-would be open to them upon the trial of his appeal.

The sureties offered to prove the foregoing, and that they had substantial grounds of defence against the decree of the probate court, which they desired and intended in good faith to litigate. The court rejected the evidence, denied the motion of the appellees and granted that of the appellants, to all of which the sureties, as appellees, excepted.

*606
      *Sargent Mies,*for the plaintiff!

*Leach £ Stevens,*for the defendants.

Blodgett, C. J.

In analogy to the right of a plaintiff to become nonsuit before opening' his case to the jury, it is the right of an appellant from the decree of the probate court to have , his appeal dismissed at any time before trial. *Doughty*v. *Little,*61 N. H. 365, *366; Simpson*v. *Gafney,*66 N. H. 477.

So far as appears, there was no error in denying the sureties’ motion that they be allowed to prosecute the appeal. Their interests are understood to be adverse to those of the appellant, and their reasons of appeal to be different from Kis ; and, if this be so, the granting of their motion would not subserve their purpose, because the only reasons of appeal before the court would be those assigned by the appellant in conformity with the statutory requirement. P. S., *c.*200, *s.*2. Under these circumstances, neither law nor the furtherance of justice would require the granting of the motion.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §3505. Effect on other laws

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to supersede or alter the existing authorities of any Federal agency with respect to ocean and coastal mapping.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12208, formerly §12206, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1426; renumbered §12208, Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIII, §10307(e)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3978.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12208 of Pub. L. 111–11 was renumbered 12210 is classified to section 3507 of this title.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1794

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct and rehabilitate Federal water supply lines associated with Folsom Dam in California, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. DOOLITTLE (for himself and Mr. OSE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to construct and 

rehabilitate Federal water supply lines associated with 

Folsom Dam in California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION OF FED4 ERAL WATER SUPPLY LINES AT FOLSOM 

5 DAM, CALIFORNIA. 

6 (a) CONSTRUCTION OF PARALLEL WATER SUPPLY

7 LINE.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte9 rior may carry out a project to design and construct 
2

•HR 1794 IH 

1 a parallel water supply line connecting the Folsom 

2 Dam pumping facility in California to the Hinkle 

3 Wye in California serving the City of Roseville, Cali4 fornia, and the San Juan Water District, California. 

5 (2) DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.—In designing 

6 and constructing the parallel water supply line, the 

7 Secretary shall—

8 (A) act as expeditiously as possible in car9 rying out the project in recognition of the crit10 ical nature of the facility; and 

11 (B) coordinate closely with the City of 

12 Roseville, California, and the San Juan Water 

13 District, California, to ensure the new pipeline 

14 meets the current and future needs of the per15 sons served by the facility. 

16 (b) REHABILITATION OF EXISTING FEDERAL WATER

17 SUPPLY LINE.—The Secretary of the Interior may carry 

18 out a project to rehabilitate the existing water supply line 

19 connecting the Folsom Dam pumping facility in California 

20 to the Hinkle Wye in California serving the City of Rose21 ville, California, and the San Juan Water District, Cali22 fornia. 

23 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

24 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
3

•HR 1794 IH 

1 out this section a total of $12,000,000 for fiscal years be2 ginning after September 30, 2003.

Æ
Order filed January 7, 2014, Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order filed 

March 18, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00725-CR

____________

JASON MICHAEL PLACIDE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1353416

ORDER

On January 7, 2014, this Court issued an order abating the appeal and 

directing the trial court to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the 

voluntariness of appellant’s statement. 

On March 14, 2014, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the 

trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, our order of 
January 7, 2014, is withdrawn. The appeal is reinstated. The State’s brief is due 

April 17, 2014.

PER CURIAM
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR CHILD EXPLOITATION PREVENTION AND INTERDICTION
Page is not included in this copy.

Pages 183 through 185 are not included in this

copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X___ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the
Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:

1.               The Registrant’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which this certificationis attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has sethis hand hereto as of the 8th day of May, 2007.
| /s/ Robert P. Akins                      |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which itrelates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form10-Q to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

----
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0138 - NRC Knowledge Management Program Status Update.

Accession Number: ML072120054

Date Released: Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML072010200 - SECY-07-0138 - NRC Knowledge Management Program Status Update. (7 page(s), 8/14/2007)
    - ML072010259 - SECY-07-0138 - Enclosure 1: Knowledge Management Dashboard. (3 page(s), 8/14/2007)
    - ML072010269 - SECY-07-0138 - Enclosure 2: Charter of the Knowledge Management Steering Committee. (4 page(s), 8/14/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Robertson, President and CEO of Teryl Resources
Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources Corp. for
the year ended May 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, BC, Canada |                           
|-------------------- | --------------------------
|                     | by:  /s/ John G. Robertson
|August 3, 2007       |                           
|                     | John G. Robertson         
|                     | President                 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained by Teryl
Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 31.1



Chief Executive Officer



I, John Long, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN LONG          
|                        |  |  |  | John Long              
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 179

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the depreciation 
    benefits available to small businesses, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Herger (for himself, Mr. Weller, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. 
 Crane, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Foley, and Mr. Manzullo) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the depreciation 
    benefits available to small businesses, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Expensing Improvement 
Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO EXPENSING UNDER SECTION 179.

    (a) Increase of Amount Which May Be Expensed.--
            (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 179(b) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar limitation) 
        is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Dollar limitation.--The aggregate cost which may be 
        taken into account under subsection (a) for any taxable year 
        shall not exceed $75,000.''
            (2) Increase in phaseout threshold.--Paragraph (2) of 
        section 179(b) of such Code is amended by striking ``$200,000'' 
        and inserting ``$325,000''.
            (3) Inflation adjustment of dollar amounts.--Subsection (b) 
        of section 179 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning in a calendar year after 2003, each dollar 
        amount contained in paragraph (1) or (2) shall be increased by 
        an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins by substituting `calendar year 
                2002' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                thereof.
        If any amount, as adjusted under the preceding sentence, is not 
        a multiple of $1,000 ($10,000 in the case of the dollar amount 
        contained in paragraph (2)), such amount shall be rounded to 
        the nearest multiple of $1,000 or $10,000, as the case may 
        be.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service in taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
§ 430.205 Agency performance appraisal program(s). ( a ) Each agency shall establish at least one appraisal program of specific procedures and requirements to be implemented in accordance with the applicable agency appraisal system. At a minimum, each appraisal program shall specify the employees covered by the program and include the procedures and requirements for planning performance (as specified in § 430.206), monitoring performance (as specified in § 430.207), and rating performance (as specified in § 430.208).
( b ) An agency program shall establish criteria and procedures to address employee performance for employees who are on detail, who are transferred, and for other special circumstances as established by the agency.
( c ) An agency may permit the development of separate appraisal programs under an appraisal system.
( d ) Agencies are encouraged to involve employees in developing and implementing their program(s). When agencies involve employees, the method of involvement shall be in accordance with law.