alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: August 13, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0619
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING Thisproceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM060014) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons on the

ie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative LawJudg Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FPCX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 465 California Street, Suite 210 SanFrancisco, CA 94104-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 Todd C. Emerson, Esq. Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWestAirlines, Respondent 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FPCX: 435-634-3505 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0619 (Civil PenaltyAction)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.



### -2-

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536



### -3-
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John McLeod, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas Corporation.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: July 13, 2007

 

/s/ John McLeod

John McLeod, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

CW1323218.1
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131877 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131877 

 COA: 260421 

Jackson CC: 04-000543-FC 

RODERICK ANDRE McGUIRE,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows: 

I would grant defendant’s application for leave to appeal to consider whether 

defendant was denied a fair trial because of prearrest delay. 

In 1981, defendant’s brother was acquitted of felony murder charges that arose out 

of a shooting death that occurred in 1980. No charges were filed against defendant until 

2004. Defendant contends that the prearrest delay denied him a fair trial. 

Michigan applies a balancing test to determine if such a delay requires reversing a 

defendant’s conviction. People v Cain, 238 Mich App 95 (1999). “A defendant has the 

burden of coming forward with evidence of prejudice resulting from the delay while the 

prosecutor has the burden of persuading the reviewing court that the delay was not 

deliberate and did not prejudice the defendant.” Id., p 108. 

In this case, 24 years elapsed between the shooting death and defendant’s arrest. 

During that time, defendant’s brother and defendant’s brother’s wife died. Both had 

provided alibi testimony at defendant’s brother’s trial, but they could not testify at 

defendant’s trial. It is also unclear whether transcripts of the brother’s trial exist and, if 

they do, whether they would be helpful to defendant in his defense. This is especially 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

true because the focus of defendant’s brother’s trial was on defendant’s brother’s 

innocence, and not defendant’s innocence. Accordingly, I would grant defendant’s 

application for leave to appeal to further explore these questions in order to determine 

whether the prearrest delay prejudiced defendant. 

l1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 29, 2006 

Clerk
Hillsborough,

June, 1898.

#### Russell *v.*Mason.

Where owners of lumber commit- the custody thereof to one of their number, who may chance to be a tradesman in lumber, to be sold by him for their joint benefit, the common property is taxable at its full value, under P. S., *o. 56, s.*16, and not as stock in trade.

Petition, for abatement of taxes for 1896, filed February 1, 1897,— the taxes having been paid by the plaintiff under protest. Trial by the court. The plaintiff is a farmer, and has been a wood and lumber dealer in Mason for several years. On the first day of April, 1896, he had $1,800 worth of lumber on hand in Mason, for which the selectmen taxed him at its full value. The plaintiff contends that the tax should have been assessed upon the average value of his lumber during the year, which he returned as $586.

It appeared from the evidence that the plaintiff' had been in the lumber business for more than twenty years, carrying it on with his farming. lie has sometimes bought timber and lumber standing, and sometimes bought the land with the lumber and wood on it. His sales have averaged upwards of $2,000 a year for the last ten years. The lumber is generally cut and manufactured in the winter, and the sales are made in the summer. The lumber in question was cut on land in Mason owned by the plaintiff, his brother, and another party, and belonged to them on April 1,1896, although it was in the plaintiff’s custody. The most of it was cut and sawed into boards and planks on the lot during the two preceding months.

The court found that the plaintiff was a dealer in lumber, wood, and timber and might be regarded as a tradesman in the same, and that the tax should be abated; and the defendants excepted.

*David Cross,*for the plaintiff.

*George B. French,*for the defendants.

Blodgett, J.

Whether, upon the facts appearing in the case, the plaintiff may properly be regarded as a tradesman in lumber within the statutory sense of the term as used in the Public Statutes, *e.*55, *s.*7, *par.*YI, it is not necessary to determine; for however this may be, as to the particular lumber in question he cannot be so regarded. A single, independent transaction in lumber like the one here disclosed does not make the parties *360engaged in it tradesmen in the statutory or any other just sense; and if they commit the custody of the common property to one of their number, who may chance to be such a tradesman, merely for the purpose of being marketed by him for their joint benefit, it will stand no differently in respect of valuation for taxation than it would if it had been committed to the other owners-, or either of them, for the like purpose. In each case alike, the statute, as well as manifest justice, requires its taxation, not as stock in trade but at “its full value.” P. S., *c.*56, s. 16; *lb., c.*58, s. 1. Exception sustained.

*Petition dismissed.*

Clark, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §41312. Report on female genital mutilation

Not later than one year after January 5, 2021, and annually thereafter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress a report that includes—

(1) an estimate of the number of women and girls in the United States at risk of or who have been subjected to female genital mutilation;

(2) the protections available and actions taken, if any, by Federal, State, and local agencies to protect such women and girls; and

(3) the actions taken by Federal agencies to educate and assist communities and key stakeholders about female genital mutilation.

(Pub. L. 116–309, §4, Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4924.)
Author: John L. Helgerson
*The Center for the Study of Intelligence supports research and publishing on the intelligence profession and its various disciplines and declassifies historical records related to US intelligence analyses and operations during the Cold War. The Center welcomes inquiries from intelligence professionals and scholars about its programs and publications.*
- ****Foreword ****Preface
-  ****Introduction- ****Chapter 1 -- Briefing Governor Clinton in Little Rock ****Chapter 2 -- Truman and Eisenhower: Launching the Process
-  ****Chapter 3 -- Into Politics With Kennedy and Johnson- ****Chapter 4 -- Nixon and Ford: Uneven Access ****Chapter 5 -- In-Depth Discussions With Carter
-  ****Chapter 6 -- Reagan and Bush: A Study in Contrasts- ****Chapter 7 -- Concluding Observations Center for the Study of Intelligence
# L_2016093EN.01003601.xml

| 7.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 22/2015

of 25 February 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/510]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 568/2014 of 18 February 2014 amending Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the assessment and verification of constancy of performance of construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 568/2014 of 18 February 2014 amending Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the assessment and verification of constancy of performance of construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Regulation (EU) No 305/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XXI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0568: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 568/2014 of 18 February 2014 (OJ L 157, 27.5.2014, p. 76).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 568/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 February 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 157, 27.5.2014, p. 76.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §151706. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in the District of Columbia, or another place as determined by the board of directors. However, the corporation may conduct business throughout the States, territories, and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 109–9, title III, §312(c), Apr. 27, 2005, 119 Stat. 226.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 151706 | 36:5703(a)(2), (3). | Oct. 11, 1996, Pub. L. 104–285, title II, §204(a)(2), (3), 110 Stat. 3384. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–9 inserted ", or another place as determined by the board of directors" after "District of Columbia".
09/28/201003:40 PM

SB7 Data

Brandon Greulich to: Adina Wiley ~_""_'__ m""'_'''~''''''WW,"",w,,''••• wwwwwm~·",·." __·,__·_w_ .• .·,._~·,_~_ww_W"m,,~'_''''_· __' '·W' " __'''''w•• _,·"~_w. __ ''·'_.'~_"''_''"" ·'__W_WWW""_._" __ .•."W--""_"_,_wC__·'W~'·_'W' ~_,,_~'_ww,.",,>·w.~_,._,,_•••• ·,",·~W __'

2 attachments

SB7_TRADES_WITH_COUNTIES.xlsx SB7-Cap-NOX-S02.xlsx

Adina,

As requested, here is the data regarding trades, the SB7 NOx / S02 caps, and the amount of

allowances used per year.

I can help to explain these spreadsheets if necessary. Also, please let me know if you need

anything else.

Have a great day!

Brandon W. Greulich

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Chief Engineer's Office MC-206

Air Quality Division

Emissions Banking and Trading

Ph: (512) 239-4904

Fax: (512) 239-5687

bgreulic@tceq.state.tx.us
### §110103. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are as provided in its articles of incorporation and include a continuing commitment, on a national basis, to—

(1) maintain true allegiance to the United States;

(2) foster and perpetuate true Americanism;

(3) combat whatever tends to impair the efficiency and permanency of our free institutions;

(4) uphold the fair name of Jews and fight their battles wherever unjustly assailed;

(5) encourage the doctrine of universal liberty, equal rights, and full justice to all men;

(6) combat the powers of bigotry and darkness wherever originating and whatever the target;

(7) preserve the spirit of comradeship by mutual helpfulness to comrades and their families;

(8) cooperate with and support existing educational institutions and establish educational institutions;

(9) foster the education of ex-servicemen and ex-servicewomen and members of the corporation in the ideals and principles of Americanism;

(10) instill love of country and flag;

(11) promote sound minds and bodies in members of the corporation and their youth;

(12) preserve the memories and records of patriotic service performed by the men and women of the Jewish faith and honor their memory; and

(13) shield from neglect the graves of our heroic dead.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1367.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110103 | 36:2703. | Aug. 21, 1984, Pub. L. 98–391, §3, 98 Stat. 1358. |

Section

Before clause (1), the word "objects" is omitted as included in "purposes".
### §10723. Authorized programs

A grant or cooperative agreement awarded under this subchapter may be made only for the following programs, with respect to the prevention, investigation, and prosecution of certain criminal activities:

(1) Programs to provide a nationwide support system for State and local criminal justice agencies.

(2) Programs to assist State and local criminal justice agencies to develop, establish, and maintain intelligence-focused policing strategies and related information sharing.

(3) Programs to provide training and investigative support services to State and local criminal justice agencies to provide such agencies with skills and resources needed to investigate and prosecute such criminal activities and related criminal activities.

(4) Programs to provide research support, to establish partnerships, and to provide other resources to aid State and local criminal justice agencies to prevent, investigate, and prosecute such criminal activities and related problems.

(5) Programs to provide information and research to the general public to facilitate the prevention of such criminal activities.

(6) Programs to establish or support national training and research centers regionally to provide training and research services for State and local criminal justice agencies.

(7) Programs to provide training and oversight to State and local criminal justice agencies to develop and comply with applicable privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties related policies, procedures, rules, laws, and guidelines.

(8) Any other programs specified by the Attorney General as furthering the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3033, as added Pub. L. 115–76, §3(a), Nov. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 1248.)
#### Olga L. Donoghue v. James W. Donoghue.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 921.]
# L_2018089EN.01002001.xml

| 5.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/20

---

Corrigendum to the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 12/2015 of 25 February 2015 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/500]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 93 of 7 April 2016
  )

On page 21, the text in point 2 of Article 1 of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 12/2015 is replaced as follows:

for:

‘The text of point 73 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1048/2012) is deleted.’

read:

‘The text of point 74 (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2012) is deleted.’

---
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2      Section 906 Certification of CFO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill Moses, as
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By: /s/ Merrill Moses
    ----------------------------

Merrill Moses
President and CFO
August 9, 2005
### §582. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 644

Section, act July 18, 1918, ch. 155, §9, 40 Stat. 912, related to subsistence allowance to persons engaged in field work.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Nancy A. Gray, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this amendment.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 8, 2012



/S/ NANCY A. GRAYNancy A. Gray
Chief Financial Officer