alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-029 June 2, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC NAMES REECE NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR PLANT IN VIRGINIA

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials at the Region II office in Atlanta have assigned

James Reece as the Senior Resident Inspector at the North Anna nuclear power plant near Mineral, Va. 

Reece had been the Resident Inspector for more than three years at the Watts Bar nuclear power plant

near Spring City, Tenn. 

Before assignment to Watts Bar, Reece worked as a project engineer in the Region II office. 

Prior to joining the NRC in March 2001, Reece gained 20 years of nuclear utility experience by

working in multiple positions associated with engineering, maintenance and operations at Duke Power

Company’s Oconee nuclear station near Seneca, S.C., at Duke’s general office in Charlotte, N.C., and

at the company’s Catawba nuclear station near York, S.C. Reece held a senior reactor operating

license at Catawba from 1989 through March 2001, and has a Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

degree from Auburn University in Alabama.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects, and interfacing with plant personnel and the public.

Reece joins NRC resident inspector Gerald Wilson and site secretary Barbara Longley at the

North Anna office where they can be reached at 540-894-5421.

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Minerals Management Service

# AGENCY:

Minerals Management Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the proposed notice of sale for proposed sale 194.

# SUMMARY:

The MMS announces the availability of the proposed Notice of Sale for proposed Sale 194 in the Central GOM OCS. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed Notice. The proposed Notice sets forth the proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty rates, and rentals.

# DATES:

                        Comments on the size, timing, or location of proposed Sale 194 are due from the affected States within 60 days following their receipt of the proposed Notice. The final Notice of Sale will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening is currently scheduled for March 16, 2005.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proposed Notice of Sale for Sale 194 and a “Proposed Sale Notice Package” containing information essential to potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, Gulf of Mexico Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-2519.

Dated: November 1, 2004.

R.M. “Johnnie” Burton,

Director, Minerals Management Service.

[FR Doc. 04-24763 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
#### § 550.322 Saving provision.

An agency shall permit a supervisor who so desires, to continue an allotment of dues to a labor organization as defined by section 2(e) of Executive Order 11491, as amended, which was permissible when the supervisor was excluded from a formal or exclusive unit by reason of the requirements of former section 24(d) of this Order.
AAM-11-332-E June 17, 2011

Exemption No. 10292 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0595

Mr. Bartley J. Hallinan Port Towsend Air, LLC. Jefferson Co. International Airport 191 Airport Rd Port Townsend, WA 98368

Dear Mr. Hallinan:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated June 2, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Port Townsend Air, LLC. (PTA), for an exemption from part 120, subpart A, D, E of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow PTA to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to PTA.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that2

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Port Townsend Air, LLC. an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow PTA to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Port Townsend Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the auspices of the Port Townsend Air part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
**EXHIBIT31.1****SECTION302 CERTIFICATION**I, George A. Burnett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media East LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors or (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 10, 2005 /s/ George A. Burnett   George A. Burnett   President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
From: <james.tamm@dot.gov>

To: <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, <rebecca.yoon@dot.gov>, <Steve.Wood@dot.gov>

Date: 09/29/2010 06:44 PM

Subject: RE: Light duty NOI Ch 7.1.3 Impacts on the U.S. Economy

Chandana,

EPA and NHTSA have agreed to drop Ch 7.1.3 Impacts on the U.S. Economy.

Jim
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-056 September 29, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL REMOVED FROM BANKRUPT CENTRAL PA. SITE

A large quantity of radioactive material has been safely shipped to a disposal site in South

Carolina following the bankruptcy of a Central Pennsylvania company. The company,

PermaGrain Products, Inc., declared bankruptcy at its Quehanna, Pa., site last December. 

The site housed a pool irradiator containing a large quantity of cobalt-60. Permagrain

used the irradiator to produce durable wood flooring for commercial applications. The site is

owned by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and was leased to PermaGrain. Following the

bankruptcy, the Commonwealth provided security for the sources. 

Plans for the removal and packaging of the sources were developed and financed by the

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, as a federal removal action. It was requested

by the NRC and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). EPA,

NRC and PADEP have worked closely on the project for the last several months. 

NRC inspectors from the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa., observed preparations

for the shipments and participated in many meetings concerning removal of the cobalt- 60

sources from the PermaGrain site. Inspectors witnessed dry runs of the cask loading operation in

advance of the shipments to assure safety of the shipments.

The final shipment arrived at the low level waste disposal site in Barnwell, S.C., on

Thursday (9/25). 

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1625 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1625

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1114 Main Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, as the ``Robert P. Hammer 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1625

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1114 Main Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, as the ``Robert P. Hammer 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1114 
Main Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Robert P. Hammer Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert P. Hammer Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 6, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|  | (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, thefinancial      condition and results of operations of the Company for the six months      ended June 30, 2010 . |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       | NF Energy Saving      Corporation |                               |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                       |                              |                               |   |
| Date:      August 17, 2010 | By:                               | /S/      Gang Li                   |   |
|                       |                              | Gang      Li                       |   |
|                       |                              | (Principal Executive      Officer) |   |

----
#### § 550.1401 Purpose.

This subpart contains OPM regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 5550b, which establishes a separate type of compensatory time off. Subject to the conditions specified in this subpart, an employee is entitled to earn, on an hour-for-hour basis, compensatory time off for time in a travel status away from the employee's official duty station when the travel time is not otherwise compensable.

[70 FR 3856, Jan. 27, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 19098, Apr. 17, 2007]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-014 April 13, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR BYRON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Company on Tuesday, April 19, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance for last year

at the Byron Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located at Byron, Ill.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 

6 p.m. at Byron Forest Preserve, 7993 North River Road, Byron.

Before the meeting is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the Byron plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe

plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Byron plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/byro_2004q4.pdf

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Byron plant operated safely during the period. The

NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Byron during 2004 were

determined to be “green.” As a result of this performance, the NRC will conduct the normal, baseline

level of inspections during the upcoming year.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in
Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant operations to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are

reactor vessel head and vessel head penetration nozzles, pressurizer penetration nozzles and steam

space piping connections, problem identification and resolution, and modifications.

Current performance information for Byron is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BYRO1/byro1_chart.html and

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BYRO2/byro2_chart.html

###
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.233 Who can receive a post differential? An employee must meet all of the following conditions to be eligible to receive a post differential: ( a ) The employee must be a citizen or national of the United States,
( b ) The employee's official worksite or detail to temporary duty must be in the post differential area, and
( c ) Immediately prior to being assigned to duty in the post differential area, the employee must have maintained his or her actual place(s) of residence outside the post differential area for an appropriate period of time (generally at least 1 year or more), except as provided in § 591.234.
§ 551.402 Agency responsibility. ( a ) An agency is responsible for exercising appropriate controls to assure that only that work for which it intends to make payment is performed.
( b ) An agency shall keep complete and accurate records of all hours worked by its employees.
#### In the Matter of Cedarhurst Gardens, Inc., Appellant, against Ernest E. Elderd et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees and Board of Assessors of the Village of Cedarhurst, Respondents. In the Matter of Hewlett Manor Corporation, Appellant, against Ernest E. Elderd et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees and Board of Assessors of the Village of Cedarhurst, Respondents.

Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
# JJo 

## ·r-

# asr- I??7- :1**~** 

# o

# sCITY OF BILLINGS AVIATION AND TRANSIT DEPARTMENT

1901 Tem1inal Circle. Room 216 Billings Logan IntemationalAirport Billings, Montana 59105-1996 (406) 657-8495 (406) 657-8438 FAX W\vw.t1ybillings.com Thomas H. Binford,A.A.E. Directoro.f Aviationand Transit Kevin Ploehn AssistantDirectorofAviationand Transit



### BILLINGS LOGAN INTERNATIONALAIRPORT SUMMER 2013 RUNWAY 10L/28RCLOSURE**NOTIC~** 

### ..

. - :·.-.-: . During the Summer of 2013, the Billings Logan International Airport 

## will

# be ;'

:

......:,}**,~** rehabilitating Runway 10L/28R, which is the main runway used by cdmmercial service airlines to transport passengers and freight. After much planning with the engineering staff and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the staff at the Airport has elected to implement a construction program for this runway rehabilitation project that will result in the closure of this important runway for six consecutive weekends. The weekend closures will be from Friday morning beginning at 9:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. Sunday evening, at whiGh point the Airport will reopen until the next Friday morning. In 2013, the six consecutive weekends impacted with runway closures will be 

### July 12-14, July 19-21, July 26-28,August 2-4,August9-11, and August 16-18.
This construction option was selected to allow some air service to be sustained during the workweek and heavier travel days, as opposed to an extended 2 or 3 week continual closure. The last time this runway was rehabilitated was in 1998. If additional information is needed please contact Kevin Ploehn, Assistant Director ofAviation and Transit at ploehnk@ci.billings.mt.us or 406-657-8484.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated this 16th day of March, 2009.    /s/ Merrill W. Sherman Merrill W. Sherman President and Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.