Page 1 of 15 

### Docket Index Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan;

California Air Resources Board; Consumer Products Direct Final and Proposed Rules ( Docket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2014

- 0529 )

September 10 , 2014 A. Rulemaking Documents A

- 1. Docket Index, Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; California Air Resources Board; Consumer Products , (Docket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 201 4

- 0 529 ), September 10 , 2014

. A

- 2. Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, California Air Resources Board; Consumer Products , Direct final rule, signed August 5, 2014 (pre

- publication version). A

- 3. Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, California Air Resources Board; Consumer Products, Proposed rule, signed August 5, 2014 (pre

- publication versio n). A

- 4. Technical Support Document for EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the California State Implementation Plan ; California Air Resources Board (CARB) Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products; California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Divi sion 3, Chapter 1, Subchapter 8.5 Consumer Products, Article 2 Consumer Products, dated July 2014. B. State Implementation Plan Submittals

– Current Rule B

- 1. Regulation for Reducing Emissions From Consumer Products, California Air Resources Board, Amended: Ma rch 15, 2013 , (CARB Attachment A)

. B

- 2. Letter from Richard W. Corey, Executive Officer, California Air Resources Board, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX, dated May 28, 2014. B

- 3. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Executive Order S

- 13

- 010. B

- 4. CARB Attachment B Coversheet and C ompleteness Checklist for SIP Revision: 2009, 2010, and 2012 Amendments , (CARB Attachment B

- 1)

. C. 2009 Second Tier Regulatory Action (CARB Attachment B
- 2). C

- 1. CARB Memo to California Office of Administrative Law (9/16/2010)

. C

- 2. Updated Informative Digest

. C

- 3. Executive Order R

- 10

- 013

. a. Executive Order R

- 10

- 013. b. Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products (Includes Sept. 2009 amendments).Page 2 of 15 c. Final Regulation Order

– Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products (2009 amendments)

– strikeout version. C

- 4. Resolution 09

- 51

. a. Resolution 09

- 51, September 24, 2009. b. CARB Attachment B, Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, S taff’s Suggested Modifications. C

- 5. Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking Including Summary of Public Comments and Agency Responses. C

- 6. Notice of Decision and Response to Significant Environmental Issues. C

- 7. Certi ficate of Mailing , 45

- day Notice.
a. Certificate of Mailing, 45

- day Notice. b. Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Proposed Amendments. C

- 8. Economic Impact Statement

. C

- 9. Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, Initial Statement of Reasons, August 7, 2009. C

- 10. Transcript of Hearin g , September 24, 2009. C

- 11. Slide Presentation , Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, September 24, 2009. C

- 12. Written Comments Received, 45

- day

. C

- 13. Certificate of Mailing , 15

- day Notice

. a. Certificate of Mailing 15

- day Notice. b. Notice of Public Availability of Modified Text.
c. Proposed Modified Regulatory Language for 15

- day Public Comment Period. C

- 14. Written Comments Received, 15

- day Notice. C

- 15. Certificate of Mailing, Second 15

- day Notice.
a. Certificate of Mailing, second 15

- day Notice. b. Second Notice of Public Availability of Modified Text.
c. Proposed Modified Regulatory Language for Second 15

- day Comment Period. C

- 16. Written Comments Received during Second 15

- day Notice Period ( No Comments Received )

. C

- 17. References

– September 2009 Rulemaking. C

- 18. Certificate of Rulemaking File

. C

- 19. Memorandum from Office of Administrative Law Memo to CARB

– Return of Approved Rulemaking Materials

- Form 400 (9/21/2010)

.Page 3 of 15

D
. 20 10 Regulatory Action (CARB Attachment B
- 3) D

- 1. Update Informative Digest

. D

- 2. Executive Order R

- 11

- 011

. a. Executive Order R

- 11

- 011. b. Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products

. c. Final Regulatory Order

– Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products (2010 proposed amendments)

– strikeout version

. D

- 3. Resolution 10

- 40
a. Resolution 10

- 40 , November 18, 2010. b. CARB Attachment B, Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations. D

- 4. Final Statement of Reasons and Addendum.
a. Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking Including Summary of Public Comments and Agency Responses. b. Addendum to the Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking. D

- 5. Notice of Decision. D

- 6. Certificate of Mailing , 45

- day and Text.
a. Certificate of Mailing, 45

- day. b. Notice of Public Hearing to Consi der Adoption of Proposed Amendments. D

- 7. Economic Impact Statement

. D

- 8. Staff Report

– Initial Statement of Reasons , September 29, 2010. D

- 9. Transcript of Hearing, November 18, 2010

. D

- 10. Slide Presentation , Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulatio ns, November 18, 2010. D

- 11. Written Comment s Received, 45

- day

. D

- 12. Certificate of Mailing, 15

- day Notice and Text.
a. Certificate of Mailing, 15

- day Notice. b. Notice of Public Availability of Modified Text.
c. 15 Day Modifications to the Original Proposed Regulation (CARB Attachment A). d. Letter from Victoria A. Whitney, Deputy Director, Division of Water Quality, to Richard W. Corey, Chief, Stationary Source Division, California Air Resources Board, (6/20/11) (CARB Attachment B). D

- 13. Written Comment s Received , 15

- day Notice. D

- 14. Certificate of Availability of References

.Page 4 of 15

D

- 15. List of References and References (on Disk)
a. 15

- day References

1. Backer, et al ., HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan

- A regional programme of measures for the marine environment based on the Ecosystem Approach

. 2010. Marine Pollution Bulletin, Volume 60, Number 6: 642

- 649. (Backer et al ., 2010). ( Copyrighted ). 2. Baker et al ., Analysis of Endocrine Disruption in Southern California Coastal Fish Using an Aquatic Multispecies Microarray. 2009. Environmental Health Perspectives. Volume 117, Number 2: 223

- 230. (Baker et al ., 2009). ( Copyrighted ). 3. Barber et al ., Reproductive responses of male fathead minnows exposed to wastewater treatment plant effluent, effluent treated with XAD8 resin, an d an environmentally relevant mixture of alkylphenol compounds . 2007. Aquatic Toxicology. Volume 82, Number 1: 36

- 46. (Barber et al ., 2007). ( Copyrighted ). 4. Canada 2002. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines for Nonylphenol and its Ethoxylates (Water, Sediment, and Soil) Scientific Supporting Document. Ecosystem Health: Science

- based Solutions Report No. 1

- 3. 2002. National Guidelines and Standards Office, Environmental Quality Branch, Environment Canada. (Canada 2002). 5. CSPA comment letter RE: Comments on Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation; Board Agenda Item# 10

- 10

- 7. November 16, 2010. (CSPA, 2010). http://www.arb .ca.gov/lists/cp2010/231

- cspa_comments_on_proposed_2010_amendments_

- _final.pdf

. 6. REACH Annex XVII Restrictions Nonylphenol and its ethoxylates, Guidance Note, Environmental Agency , December 2010. (Environmental Agency, 2010). 7. Hanson, et al ., Effects of 1713

- estradiol, 4

- nonylphenol, and 13

- sitosterol on the growth h ormone - insulin

- like growth factor system and seawater adaptation of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus My kiss). Aquaculture. Published online September 18, 2010. (Hanson et al .,2010)

. (Cop yrighted). 8. HELCOM Ministerial Declaration on the Implementation of the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan. May 2010. (HELCOM, 2010)

. 9. Huang , et al ., Huang, G.L., Hou, S.G., Wang, L., Sun, H.W. Distribution and fate of nonylphenol in an aquatic microcosm. 2007. Water Research. Volume 41, Number 20: 4630

- 4638. (Huang et al ., 2007)

. (Copyrighted). 10. Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Bureau of Remediation and Waste Management. Basis Statement for Chapter 883, Designation of the Chemical Class Nonylp henol and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates as a Priority Chemical and Safer Chemicals Program Support Document forPage 5 of 15 the Designation as a Priority Chemical of Nonylphenol and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates . September 2, 2010. (Maine, 2010)

. http://www.maine.gov/dep/safechem/rules/nonylphenol%20_support_doc ument_final.pdf 11. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Aquatic Life Water Quality Standards. Technical Support Document for Nonylphenol and Ethoxylates . Draft for External Review. October 14, 2010. (Minnesota, 2010)

. www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view

- document.html?gid=14925 12. OSPAR Commissi on. Rev iew Statement for the OSPAR Background Document on nonylphenol/nonylphenol ethoxylates . Update 2009. (OSPAR, 2009)

. 13. 

### Schoenfuss et.al., Impairment of the reproductive potential of male fathead minnows by environmentally relevant exposures to 4

- nonylphenol. 2008. Aquatic Toxicology. Volume 86, Number1: 91

- 98. (Schoenfuss et al ., 2008)

. (Copyrighted). 14. Sumi et al ., Comparison of serum vitellogenin, steroid hormone, gonad histopathology and bioaccumulation in common carp (Cvprinus carpio) of two rivers and a lake in Japan: potential for endocrine disruption. 2007. Journal of Environmental Sciences. Volume 14, Numbe r 1: 41c54. (Sumi et al ., 2007)

. (Copyrighted). 15. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Design for the Environment (DfE). Safer Detergents Stewardship Initiative (SDSil. Updated February 24, 2009. (U.S. EPA, 2009b)

. 16. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Nonylphenol (NP) and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPEs) Action Plan [RIN 2070

- ZA09). August 18, 2010. 17. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria

- Nonylphenol. Office of Water, Office of Scienc e and Technology, Washington, D.C. EPA

- 822

- R

- 05

- 005. December 2005. (U.S. EPA, 2005). 18. Vajda et al ., Reproductive Disruption in Fish Downstream from an Estrogenic Wastewater Effluent. 2008. Environmental Science & Technology. Volume 42, Number 9: 3407

- 3414. (Vajda et al

. , 2008)

. (Copyrighted). 19. Ward et al ., Scents and Scents

- ability: Pollution Disrupts Chemical Social Recognition and Shoaling in Fish. 2008. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, Volume 275, Number 1630: 101

- 105. (Ward et al ., 2008)

. (Copyrighted). 20. Xie et al ., Evaluation of Estrogenic Activities of Aquatic Herbicides and Surfactants Using an Rainbow Trout Vitellogenin Assay. 2005. Toxicological Sciences. Volume 87, Number 2: 391

- 398. (Xie et al ., 2005)

. (Copyrighted).Page 6 of 15

b. California Office of Administrative Law, Appendices

1. CARB Appendix B References

. (1) ASTM D 3257

- 06, Standard Test Method for Aromatics in Mineral Spirits by Gas Chromatography. (Copyrighted). (2) ASTM E 1782

- 08, Standard Test Method for Determining Vapor Pressure by Thermal Analysis. (Copyrighted). (3) US EPA SW

- 846 Method 8015B, Nonhalogenated Organics Using GC/FID. (4) US EPA SW

- 846 Method 8020, Aromatic Volatile Organics by Gas Chromatography. (5) US EPA SW

- 846 Method 8270D, Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). 2. CARB Appendix E References. (1) Chemical Engineering magazine. Chemical Engineering Plant Cos t Index . April, 1997. (Chemical Engineering, 1997)

. (Copyrighted)

. (2) Chemical Engineering magazine. Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index . June, 2010. (Chemical Engineering, 2010)

. (Copyrighted). (3) Peters, M. S. and Timmerhaus, K. D. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers . 3rd Edition, McGraw

- Hill Book Company, 1980, 159

- 162. (Peters and Timmerhaus, 1980)

. (Copyrighted).
c. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 3 References. ( N ote there are no references associated with Chapters 1, 2, and 5) Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, Initial Statement of Reasons, August 7, 2009. d. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 4 References.

1. Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, Initial Statement of Reasons, August 7, 2009. 2. Delfino et al ., Association of Asthma Symptoms with Peak Particulate Air Pollution and Effect Modification by Anti

- inflammatory Medication Use

. 2002. Environmental Health Perspectives. Volume 110, Number 10: A607

- 617. (Delfino et al ., 2002)

. (Copyrighted). 3. Dominici et al ., Revised Analyses o f the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study, Part II. 2003. Health Effects Institute Special R eport. (Dominici et al ., 2003). (Copyrighted). 4. Dominici et. at., Revised Analyses of the National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study: Mortality Among Residents of 90 Cities . 2005.Page 7 of 15 Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Part A, 68:1071

- 92. (Dominici et al ., 2005)

. (Copyrighted)

. 5. Dominici et al ., Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Hospital Admission for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases . 2006. Journal of American Medical Association. Volume 295, Number 10: 1127

- 1134. (Dominici et al ., 2006)

. (Copyrighted). 6. Gauderman et al ., Association Between Air Pollution and Lung Function Growth in Southern California Children . 20 00. American Journal Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. Volume 162: 1383

- 1390. (Gauderman et al ., 2000)

. (Copyrighted). 7. Gauderman et al ., Association between Air Pollution and Lung Function Growth in Southern California Children: Results from a Second Cohort

. 2002. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. Volume 166: 76

- 84. (Gauderman et al ., 2002)

. (Copyrighted). 8. Gauderman et al ., The Effect of Air Pollution on Lung Development from 10 to 18 Years of Age . 2004. New England Journal of Medicine. Volume 351, Number 11: 1057

- 1067. (Gauderman et al ., 2004)

. (Copyrighted). 9. Gauderman et al ., Childhood Asthma and Exposure to Traffic and Nitrogen Dioxide . 2005. Epidemiology. Volume 16, Number 6: 737

- 743. (Gauder man et al ., 2005). (Copyrighted). 10. Gilliland et al ., The Effects of Ambient Air Pollution on School Absenteeism Due to Respiratory Illnesses . 2001. Epidemiology. Volume 12, Number 1: 43

- 54. (Gilliland et al ., 2001)

. (Copyrighted). 11. Krewski et al ., Reanalysis of the Harvard Six Cities Study and the American Cancer Society Study of Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality

. 2000. Special Report. Health Effects Institute. (Krewski et al ., 2000)

. (Copyrighted). 12. Laden et al ., Association of Fine Particulate Matter from Different Sources with Daily Mortality in Six U.S. Cities . 2000. Environmental Health Perspectives. Volume 108, Number 10: 941

- 947. (Laden et al ., 2000)

. (Copyrighted). 13. Laden et al ., Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and M ortality

. 2006. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. Volume 173: 667

- 672. (Laden et al ., 2006)

. (Copyrighted). 14. McConnell et al ., Air Pollution and Bronchitic Symptoms in Southern California Children with Asthma . 1999. Environmental H ealth Perspectives. Volume 107, Number 9: 757

- 760. (McConnell et al ., 1999)

. (Copyrighted). 15. McConnell et al ., Asthma in Exercising Children Exposed to Ozone: A Cohort Study . 2002. Lancet. Volume 359: 386

- 391. (McConnell et al ., 2002)

. (Copyrighted).Page 8 of 15 16. Miller et al ., Long

- term Exposure to Air Pollution and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events in Women . 2007. New England Journal of Medicine. Volume 356, Number 5: 447

- 458. (Miller et al ., 2007)

. (Copyrighted). 17. Moolgavkar, S.H. Air Pollution and Daily Deaths and Hospital Admissions in Los Angeles and Cook Counties. Revised Analyses of Time

- Series Studies of Air Pollution and Hea lth . 2003. Special Report. Health Effects Institute: 183

- 198. (Moolgavkar, 2003)

. (Copyrighted). 18. Ostro, B.D. and Rothschild, S. Air Po llution and Acute Respiratory Morbidity: An Observational Study of Multiple Pollutants . 1989. Environmental Research. Volume 50: 238

- 247. (Ostro and Rothschild, 1989)

. (Copyrighted). 19. Ostro et al ., Air Pollution and Respiratory Morbidity among Adults in Southern California . 1993. American Journal of Epidemiology. Volume 137, Number 7: 691

- 700. (Copyrighted). 20. Peel et.al., Ambient Air Pollution and Respiratory Emergency Department Visits . 2005. Epidemiology. Volume 16, Number 2: 164

- 174. (Peel et al ., 2005 )

. (Copyrighted). 21. Pope et al ., Lung Cancer , Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long

- term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution . 2002. Journal of American Medical Association. Volume 287, Number 9: 1132

- 41. (Pope et al ., 2002)

. (Copyrighted). 22. Pope et al ., Cardiovascular Mortality and Long

- Term Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution: Epidemiological Evidence of General Pathophysiological Pathways of Disease . 2004. Circulation. Volume 109: 71

- 77. (Pope et al ., 2004)

. (Copyrighted). 23. Seinfeld, J.H. and Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics From Air Pollution to Climate Change . John Wiley & Sons Inc. New York. (Copyrighted).
e. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 6 References.

1. Proposed Regulation to Reduce Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer Products

– Staff Report, August 1990. 2. Proposed Amendments to the Statewide Regulation to Reduce Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer Products

– Phase II

– Staff Report, October 1991. 3. Proposed Amendments to the California Consume r Products Regulations, Initial Statement of Reasons, August 7, 2009. 4. David et al ., Alkylphenols in Marine Environments: Distribution Monitoring Strategies and Detection Considerations . 2009. Marine Pollution Bulletin. Volume 58: 953

- 960. (David et al ., 2 009)

. (Copyrighted).Page 9 of 15

f. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 7 References.

1. Proposed Regulation to Reduce Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer Products

– Staff Report, August 1990. 2. Proposed Amendments to the Statewide Regulation to Re duce Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer Products

– Phase II

– Staff Report, October 1991. 3. Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Including Summary of Comments and Agency Responses, M id

- term Measures, July 4, 1997. 4. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation, Mid

- term Measure s I, June 6, 1997. 5. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation, Mid

- term Measure s I I, September 10, 1999. 6. 2003 Consumer & Commercial Products Survey, November 3, 2004. 7. Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation for the Aerosol Coatings Regulation, September 29, 2006. 8. Final Regulatory Order, Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Emissions of Perchloroethylene Associated with Dry Cleaning Operations and Requirements for Manufacturers and Distributors of Perchloroethylene, Approved by the Office of Administrative Law on December 27, 2007. 9. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation, May 9, 2008. 10. California Department of Public Health. Health Benefits . Memorandum dated September 16, 2010, from Gilberto Chavez, M.D., M.P.H., State Epidemiologist, Deputy Director, Cent er for Infectious Diseases, to Richard Corey, Chief, Stationary Source Division, Air Resources Board. (CA DPH, 2010)

. 11. Claire Manufacturing Company. Claire Technical Information: Jet Force Wasp and Hornet Killer. September 15, 2010. http://clairemfg.com/sites/all/themes/theme623/techsheets/ts

- c005.pdf

. (Claire, 2010)

. 12. Institute for Research and Technical Assistance . Safer Alternatives for th e Textile Cleaning Industry: Alternative Spotting Agents and Evaluation of Improvements in Carbon Dioxide and Wet Cleaning Technologies

. November, 2009. (IRTA, 2009)

. 13. Schafer, E. The Science of Dilution . Maintenance Supplies. September 23, 2008. (Schafer , 2008)

. (C opyright ed). 14. State Coalition for Remediation of Dry Cleaners. Glossary of Drycleaning Terms. September 15, 2010.Page 10 of 15 http://www.drycleancoalition.org/docdisplay.cfm?doc=dcglossary.htm (SCRDC, 2010)

. 15. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Design for the Environment. Garment and Textile Care Program. Frequently Asked Questions About Drycleaning . June, 1998. (U.S. E PA, 1998b) EPA 744

- K

- 98

- 002

. g. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 8 References.

1. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation, Mid

- term Measure s I, June 6, 1997. 2. Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, Initial Statement of Reasons, August 7, 2009

. 3. D&B Industry and Financial Consulting Services. Industry Norms & Key Business Ratios, Manufacturing

– Volume 1. SIC #2000

- 2999. Three Year Edition 2007

- 2008 . January, 2008, pp. 192,194. (D&B, 2008)

. (C opyright ed)

. 4. D&B Industry and Financial Consulting Services. Industry Norms & Key Business Ratios, Manufacturing

– Volume 1. SIC #2000

- 2999 . Three Year Edition 2008

- 2009. January, 2009, pp. 167,175,184. (D&B, 2009)

. (C opyr ight ed)

. h. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 9 References.

1. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation, M id

- term Measure s II, September 10, 1999

. 2. Staff Report: Initial Statement of Reasons for the Proposed Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Emissions of Chlorinated Toxic Air Contaminants from Automotive Maintenance and Repair Activities, March 10, 2000. 3. Initial Statement of Reasons for the Proposed Amendments to the California Aeroso l Coating Products, Antiperspirants and Deodorants, and Consumer Products Regulations, (CONS

- 1), May 7, 2004. 4. Bowman et al ., Ozone and Aerosol Productivity of Reactive Organics

. 1994. Atmospheric Environment. Volume 29: 579 589. (Bowman et al ., 1994)

. (Cop yrighted). 5. Chan, et al ., Understanding Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Formation from Lower

- Volatility Precursors: Photooxidation of Naphthalene and Alkyl

- naphthalenes

. February 27, 2009. (Chan et al ., 2009). (Copyrighted). 6. David et al ., Alkylphenols in Marine Environments: Distribution Monitoring Strategies and Detection Considerations . 2009. Marine Pollution Bulletin. Volume 58: 953

- 960. (David et al ., 2009)

. (Copyrighted).Page 11 of 15 7. Finlayson

- Pitts et al ., Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere

. Chapter 9, Academic Press, New York, 2000. (Finlayson

- Pi tts and Pitts, 2000). (C opyright ed). 8. Griffin et al ., Incremental Aerosol Reactivity: Application to Aromatic and Biogenic Hydrocarbons . 1999. Environmental Science & Technology. Volume 33: 2403 2408. (Griff in et al ., 1999)

. (Copyrighted). 9. Grosjean, D. In Situ Organic Aerosol Formation during a Smog Episode: Estimated Production and Chemical Functionality . 1992. Atmospheric Environment. Volume 26A, Number 6: 953 963. (Grosjean, 1992)

. (Copyrighted). 10. McConnel l et al ., Asthma in Exercising Children Exposed to Ozone: A Cohort Study . 2002. Lancet. Volume 359: 386

- 391. (McConnell et al ., 2002)

. (Copyrighted). 11. Moolgavkar et al ., A Critical Review of the Evidence on Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality. 1996. Epidemiology. Volume 7, Number 4: 420 428. (Moolgavkar and Luebeck, 1996)

. (Copyrighted). 12. Pandis et al ., Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation and Transport . 1992. Atmospheric Environment. Volume 26A: 2269 2282. (Pandis et al ., 1992)

. (Copyrighted). 13. Schwartz et al ., Is Daily Mortality Associated Specifically with Fine Particles? 1996. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. Volume 46: 927 939. (Schwartz et al ., 1996)

. (Copyrighted). 14. Seinfeld, J.H. and Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics From Air Pollution to Climate Change . John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. 1998, pp. 299,300,724

- 726,738

- 741. (Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998)

. (Copyrighted). 15. Singer et al ., Cleaning Products and Air Fresheners: Emissions and Resulting Concentrations of Glycol Ethers and Terpenoids . Indoor Air. 2006. Volume 16: 179

- 191. (Singer et al ., 2006)

. (Copyrighted). i. California Office of Administrative Law, Chapter 10 References.

1. Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, Initial Statement of Reasons, August 7, 2009

. 2. 75 FR 2938 (January 19, 2010), National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. j. California Office of Administrative Law, Executive Summary References.

1. Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulations, Initial St atement of Reasons, August 7, 2009

. 2. David et al ., Alkylphenols in Marine Environments: Distribution Monitoring Strategies and Detection Considerations . 2009. MarinePage 12 of 15 Pollution Bulletin. Volume 58: 953

- 960. (David et al ., 2009)

. (Copyrighted). 3. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Provisional Reference Exposure Levels (RELS) Compounds of Interest As Possible LVP

- VOCS. Memorandum dated September 16, 2010, from Melanie Marty, Ph.D., Chief, Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch, Office of Enviro nmental Health Hazard Assessment, to Janette Brooks, Chief, Air Quality Measures Branch, Air Resources Board. (OEHHA, 2010)

. 4. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Effects on Water Quality of Alkylphenol Ethoxylate Surfactants (APEOs) . Memoran dum dated July 15, 2010, from Keith Maruya, Principle Scientist, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, to Darrin Polhemus, Deputy Director, Division of Water Quality, State Water Resour ces Control Board. (SCCWRP, 201 0)

. 5. State Water Resources Control Board. Water Quality Effects of Alkylphenol Ethoxylate Surfactants. Memorandum dated September 20, 2010, from Darrin Polhemus, Deputy Director, Division of Water Quality, State Water Resources Control Board, to Richard Corey, Chief, Stationary Source Division, Air Resources Board. (SWRCB, 2010a)

. 6. State Water Resources Control Board. Effects on Water Quality of Alkylphenol Ethoxylate Surfactants. Memorandum dated July 19, 2010, from Valerie M. Connor, Ph.D., Office of Informatio n Management and Analysis, State Water Resources Control Board, to Darrin Polhemus, Deputy Director, Division of Water Quality, State Water Resources Control Board. (SWRCB, 2010b)

. k. 15

- day References for CARB Attachment B 15

- day materials

. l. CARB References f or November 2010 Rulemaking (by Chapter)

. D

- 16. Office of Administrative Law Approval and Form 400.
a. Memorandum from Office of Administrative Law Memo to CARB

– Return of Approved Rulemaking Materials

- Form 400 (11/22/2011). b. Method 310

– Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in Consumer Products and Reactive Organic Compounds in Aerosol Coating Products

– strikeout version ( September 29, 2011)

. c. Final Regulatory Order

– Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products (2010 proposed amen dments)

– strikeout version. D

- 17. Certificate of Rulemaking File

. E. 2012 Regulatory Action (CARB Attachment B
- 4)
. E

- 1. Updated Informative Digest E

- 2. Executive Order R

- 12

- 015

. a. Executive Order R

- 12

- 015.Page 13 of 15 b. Final Regulatory Order

– Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products (2012 amendments)

– strikeout version. E

- 3. Resolution 12

- 32

. a. Resolution 12

- 32, October 18, 2012. b. Attachment B to the Resolution 12

- 32. E

- 4. Final Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Including Summary of Comments and Agency Responses. E

- 5. Notice of De cision

. E

- 6. Certificate of Mailing 45

- day and text

. a. Certificate of Mailing, 45

- day. b. Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Amendments. E

- 7. Economic Impact Statement

. E

- 8. Staff Report

– Initial Statement of Reasons

. a. Staff Report

– Initial Statement of Reasons, August 29, 2012. b. Appendix A

– Proposed Amendments to the Regulation for Reducing Emissions from Consumer Products.
c. Appendix B

– Analysis to Identify Freezing Regions and Evaluate Impacts of Expanding Type “A” Areas. E

- 9. Transcript of Hearing , October 18, 2012. E

- 10. Slide Pre sentation , Proposed Amendments to the Consumer Products Regulation Pertaining to Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid, October 18, 2012. E

- 11. Written Comment, 45

- day

. a. CSPA comment letter RE: Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation Pertaining to Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid Products ; Board Agenda Item# 1 2

- 7

- 2

. October 15, 2012

. b. ASPA comment letter RE: Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation Pertaining to Automotive Windshield Washer Fluid Products; Board Agenda Item# 12

- 7

- 2. October 16, 2012. E

- 12. Certificate of Mailing, 15

- day Notice and Text

. a. Certificate of Mailing, 15

- day. b. Notice of Public Availability of Modified Text.
c. Attachment 15

- day Modifications. E

- 13. Written Comment, 15

- day

. E

- 14. Certification of Availabi lity of References. E

- 15. References

.Page 14 of 15 a. Consumer Products 2012 Master Reference List. b. References for CARB Appendix B. 1. Proposed Amendments to the Californ ia Consumer Products Regulation and the Aerosol Coatings Regulation; Initial Statement of Reasons, September 29, 2006

. 2. ArcGIS Online. 3. California Department of Finance, Population Projection. 4. PRISM Spatial Climate Layers

– Course Material, Daly and Johnson, December 3, 1998. 5. Daly et al., A Knowledge

- base Approach to the Statistical Mapping of Climate . 2002. Climat e Research. Volume 22:99

- 113. (Copyrighted). 6. Daly et al., Physiographically Sensitive Mapping of Climatological Temperature and Precipitation Across the Conterminous United States

. 2008. International Journal of Climatology

. 28: 2031

– 2064. doi: 10.1002/joc .1688

. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.1688/pdf 7. Daly C. 2006. Guidelines for assessing the suitability of spatial climate data sets . International Journal of Climatology 26: 707

– 721. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.1322/pdf 8. PRI SM Climate Group. 9. World Climate Programme Data, Calculation of Monthly and Annual 30

- year Standard Normals , WCDP

- No. 10 WMO

- TD/No. 341, World Meteorological Organization, March 1989.
c. References for CARB Technical Support Document. 1. Proposed Regulation to Reduce Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Consumer Products, Technical Support Document, August 1990. 2. Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the California Consumer Products Regulation, Mid

- term Measures II, September 10, 1999. 3. Initial Statement of Reasons for the Proposed Amendments to the California Aerosol Coating Products, Antip erspirants and Deodorants, and Consumer Products Regulations, (CONS

- 1), May 7, 2004. E

- 16. Memorandum from Office of Administrative Law Memo to CARB

– Return of Approved Rulemaking Materials

– OAL File No. 2013

- 0315

- 03S. Form 400 (4/26/2013). E

- 17. Certificate of Rule making File

. F. Rulemaking Support Documents. F

- 1. Final Approval of California Air Resources Board Consumer Products Regulation. Amended May 5 , 2009, submitted February 16 , 2010. (76 FR 27613 May 12, 2011).Page 15 of 15

F

- 2. 40 CFR 59 Subpart C

– National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Consumer Products. F

- 3. Consumer Products Regulations Overview and Proposed Amendments, September 26, 2013. California Air Resources Board. F

- 4. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations. Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register. May 25, 1988. F

- 5. State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992). F

- 6. Guidance Document for Correcting Commo n VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies (A.K.A., The Little Bluebook). Issued April 1991, Revised August 21, 2001.