alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.� Archived copies ofpublications are retrieved in the event that publications are no longeravailable from the original publishing agency site. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****GPO Access training manual [electronicresource].**** 
June 2001 | August 2001 | July2003
 
SuDoc Number:GP 3.29/2:
Item Number:0556-C (online)
CGP System Number:000546715
 
 
 
 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
 
June 27, 2017******
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Gretchen E. Schneider, Respondent, against Archie Baxter’s Flying Service, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Aggregate Trust Fund of the State Insurance Fund, Respondent. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*1038All concur.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/  David Salzman
-------------------------
by: David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman
American Credit Corp., Manager
of the Company
February 13, 2003
# L_2017085EN.01004501.xml

| 30.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 85/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 85/45

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 222/2015

of 25 September 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/529]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2015/653 of 24 April 2015 amending Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2015/653 of 24 April 2015 amending Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 24f (Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 L 0653: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/653 of 24 April 2015 (OJ L 107, 25.4.2015, p. 68).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 L 0653: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/653 of 24 April 2015 (OJ L 107, 25.4.2015, p. 68).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive (EU) 2015/653 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Ingrid SCHULERUD

---

(1)  
  OJ L 107, 25.4.2015, p. 68.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Laurel Marcus, an Infant, by Sylvia Marcus, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. David Levin, Appellant.

Order denying defendant’s motions addressed to the amended complaint for, first, an order requiring plaintiff separately to state and number causes of action; second, for an order directing plaintiff io make the complaint more definite and certain; and third, directing plaintiff to serve an amended complaint in the name of the plaintiff, formerly an infant and now of full age, modified on the law by striking from the first decretal paragraph the words “ denied in all respects *”*and substituting therefor the words “denied as to the first two motions and granted as to the third motion”; and by striking out the second decretal paragraph and substituting therefor the following paragraph: “ Ordered that plaintiff within ten days serve a second amended complaint in her own name, omitting therefrom refer*772ence to the appointment of a guardian ad litem”. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the amended complaint states but one cause of action and is neither indefinite, uncertain nor obscure. If the complaint is to be verified, the defendant is entitled to' have the verification by the plaintiff, now of age. (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 99.) Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
### §11314. Grants for tribal delinquency prevention and response programs

#### (a) In general

The Administrator shall make grants under this section, on a competitive basis, to eligible Indian Tribes (or consortia of Indian Tribes) as described in subsection (b)—

(1) to support and enhance—

(A) tribal juvenile delinquency prevention services; and

(B) the ability of Indian Tribes to respond to, and care for, at-risk or delinquent youth upon release; and

(2) to encourage accountability of Indian tribal governments with respect to preventing juvenile delinquency, and responding to, and caring for, juvenile offenders.

#### (b) Eligible Indian Tribes

To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an Indian Tribe or consortium of Indian Tribes shall submit to the Administrator an application in such form as the Administrator may require.

#### (c) Considerations

In providing grants under this section, the Administrator shall take into consideration, with respect to the Indian Tribe to be served, the—

(1) juvenile delinquency rates;

(2) school dropout rates; and

(3) number of youth at risk of delinquency.

#### (d) Availability of funds

Of the amount available for a fiscal year to carry out this subchapter, 11 percent shall be available to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §305, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 505 of Pub. L. 93–415, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12222(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1896, which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2004 to 2008, was renumbered section 506 and was classified to section 5784 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to omission from the Code and its subsequent repeal by Pub. L. 115–385, title IV, §402(c)(2), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5160.

Another prior section 505 of Pub. L. 93–415, as added Pub. L. 102–586, §5(a), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5028; amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(b) [title I, §129(a)(2)(F)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–50, 2681–76, related to grants for prevention programs, prior to the general amendment of title V of Pub. L. 93–415 by Pub. L. 107–273.

Another prior section 505 of Pub. L. 93–415, title V, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1135, amended section 5035 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and was repealed by Pub. L. 115–385, title III, §307, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5152.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section not applicable with respect to funds appropriated for any fiscal year that begins before Dec. 21, 2018, see section 3 of Pub. L. 115–385, set out as an Effective Date of 2018 Amendment note under section 11102 of this title.
### §10234. Prohibition on use of Central Intelligence Agency services

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no use will be made of services, facilities, or personnel of the Central Intelligence Agency.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §815, formerly §822, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1214; renumbered §815, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609B(f), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3789k of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 815 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 809 and is classified to section 10228 of this title.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

July 21, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00676-CV

IN RE ANDREA SIMON, AMBER CROOK, AMANDA BUSBEE, WALTER 

SIMON, AND JAMES CAMBPELL, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-01361

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators Andrea Simon, Amber Crook, Amanda Busbee, Walter Simon, and 

James Cambpell filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for 

temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Ravi 

K. Sandill, presiding judge of the 127th District Court of Harris County, to vacate 

the trial court’s November 19, 2021 order allowing Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to 
2

interplead Albert Benjamin Simon’s estate funds into the registry of the district 

court.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, our 

November 23, 2021 stay is lifted.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
p.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

58) VI-B-9 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37 PM Sheet 58 of 107 
P.2 

A-90-37 

Vl-B-9 

This document has been moved to IV-E-27 at the request of the project 

officer. It was incorrectly categorize originally.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50620

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DOUGLAS MILANTONI,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-95-CR-352-6

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Douglas Milantoni appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for a bill of particulars based upon alleged lack of

specificity in the indictment, and his motion for new trial based

on new evidence of a prior conviction of one of the Government’s

witnesses. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying a bill of particulars because Milantoni has not shown

actual surprise at trial due to a lack of a bill of particulars. 
No. 96-50620

- 2 -

See United States v. Martino, 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir. 1981). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion for new trial because the new evidence of an

undisclosed prior conviction of a Government witness was

cumulative and there is no reasonable probability that it would

have produced a different result. United States v. Sotelo, 97

F.3d 782, 792 (5th Cir. 1996). 

 AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.7 - Declaration of Trust



Exhibit 10.7


DECLARATION OF TRUST


This declaration of trust is made by Sergei Stetsenko (the "Trustee") in favour of Peloton Resources Inc. (the "Beneficiary").  The Trustee solemnly declares that he holds a 100% interest in the Colby #1 - #6 mineral claims, Tenure Numbers 723601 - 723606 inclusive (the "Property") located in the Greenwood Mining Division, British Columbia, Canada, in trust solely for the benefit fo the beneficiary.


The Trustee further promises the Beneficiary not to deal with the property in any way, except to transfer the Property to the Beneficiary, without written instructions, direction and consent of the Beneficiary.


Given at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada on the 19th day of January, 2004.


	
SIGNED SEALED AND DELIVERED by
	
)
	
 

	
SERGEI STETSENKO in the presence of
	
)
	
 

	
 
	
)
	
 

	
/s/ Maryna Bilynska
	
)
	
/s/ Sergei Stetsenko

	
SIGNATURE OF WITNESS
	
)
	
SERGEI STETSENKO

	
 
	
)
	
 

	
/s/ Maryna Bilynska
	
)
	
 

	
NAME OF WITNESS
	
)
	
 

	
 
	
)
	
 

	
1160 - 1040 West Georgia Street
	
)
	
 

	
ADDRESS OF WITNESS
	
)
§ 6701.102 Prohibition on solicited sales to subordinates. A GSA employee shall not engage in solicitation of sales, on or off duty, to any GSA employee under his supervision, at any level. This prohibition applies, but is not limited to, solicitation for the sale of insurance, stock, mutual funds, real estate, computer equipment and any other commodities, goods or services except: ( a ) The one-time sale of the employee's personal property or privately owned dwelling; or
( b ) Sales made in the course of outside employment of GSA employees in retail stores and under other circumstances not involving solicitation.
# L_2016129EN.01003801.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 55/2015

of 20 March 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/738]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2014/77/EU of 10 June 2014 amending Annexes I and II of Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2014/77/EU of 10 June 2014 amending Annexes I and II of Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 6a (Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 L 0077: Commission Directive 2014/77/EU of 10 June 2014 (OJ L 170. 11.6.2014, p. 62).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 L 0077: Commission Directive 2014/77/EU of 10 June 2014 (OJ L 170. 11.6.2014, p. 62).’

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2014/77/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee incorporating Directive 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) into the EEA Agreement, whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 170, 11.6.2014, p. 62.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 88.

2

---
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. II-00-66 November 20, 2000

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416/e-mail: kmc2@nrc.gov

Roger D. Hannah (404)562-4417/e-mail: rdh1@nrc.gov

LICENSING BOARD TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS ON

HARRIS PLANT SPENT FUEL POOL LICENSE AMENDMENT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will hear oral

arguments on December 7 regarding the Orange County, North Carolina, Board of Commissioners’

contention that an environmental impact statement is required for a request by Carolina Power & Light

that the NRC amend the operating license for the Harris nuclear plant to place two unused spent fuel

pools in service. The Harris plant is located southwest of Raleigh and southeast of Orange County.

In December 1998, CP&L filed for a license amendment from the NRC that would allow the

company to use the additional fuel pools and the Orange County Board of Commissioners petitioned to

intervene. The ASLB, which is composed of independent judges who conduct formal hearings on

licensing actions, granted the Commissioners' petition and has been in the process of conducting

hearings on the case.

On December 7, the ASLB will hear oral arguments from CP&L, the Orange County Board of

Commissioners, and the NRC staff related to the environmental impact statement contention.

The oral arguments will begin at 9:30 a.m. in the Jane S. McKimmon Conference Center, North

Carolina State University, at the corner of Gorman Street and Western Boulevard in Raleigh, and will

be open for public observation.

###
### §749. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section, acts July 27, 1912, ch. 255, §2, 37 Stat. 239; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to reimbursement of lighthouse keepers for clothing, etc., furnished shipwrecked persons. See section 2777 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
#### § 1651.18 Payment to one bars payment to another.

Payment made to a beneficiary(ies) in accordance with this part, based upon information received before payment, bars any claim by any other person.
§ 550.401 Purpose, applicability, authority, and administration. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart provides regulations to administer subchapter III (except sections 5524a and 5525) of chapter 55 of title 5, United States Code. The regulations provide for Governmentwide uniformity in making payments during an evacuation to employees or their dependents, or both, who are evacuated in the United States because of natural disasters or for military or other reasons that create imminent danger to their lives.
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to— ( 1 ) Executive agencies, as defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.
( 2 ) Employees of an agency who are U.S. citizens or who are U.S. nationals;
( 3 ) Employees of an agency who are not citizens or nationals of the United States, but who were recruited with a transportation agreement that provides return transportation to the area from which recruited; and
( 4 ) Alien employees of an agency hired within the United States.
( c ) *Authority.* The head of an agency may make advance payments and evacuation payments and pay special allowances as provided by this subpart. If the head of an agency proposes to issue regulations that deviate from the provisions of this subpart, prior approval of the agency regulations, as required by section 4(b) of Executive Order 10982 of December 25, 1961, must be secured from the Office of Personnel Management.
( d ) *Administration.* The head of an agency having employees subject to this subpart is responsible for the proper administration of this subpart. Payment of advance payments and evacuation payments and any required adjustments shall be made in accordance with procedures established by the agency.
[59 FR 66632, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 65 FR 41869, July 7, 2000]
§ 730.103 Coverage. ( a ) The following individuals are subject to the post-employment conflict-of-interest restrictions in 18 U.S.C. 207(c), as amended by section 1125(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2004: ( 1 ) Any individual, including a senior executive, who is paid at a rate of basic pay equal to or greater than 86.5 percent of the rate for level II of the Executive Schedule; and
( 2 ) Any individual, including a senior executive, who as of November 23, 2003, was paid at a rate of basic pay, exclusive of any locality-based comparability payments under 5 U.S.C. 5304, equal to or greater than the rate of basic pay for level 5 of the Senior Executive Service on that date (*i.e.*, $134,000). These employees are subject to the post-employment restrictions through November 24, 2005, without regard to any subsequent changes in position or pay.
( b ) Nothing in this part affects individuals serving in positions described in 18 U.S.C. 207(c)(2)(A)(i), (iii), (iv), or (v).
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY OF 2002

In connection with the interim quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d)
of the securities exchange act of 1934 of Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc. on
Form 10QSB dated for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Registration Statement fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) pr 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Registration Statement fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

February  14, 2005

By: /s/ Clive de Larrabeiti
    -----------------------
    Clive de Larrabeiti
    President and Director
    (who also performs the function of principal financial officer and principal
    accounting officer)