alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE
CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 6, 2005 |  | /s/ JOHN LONG          
|                  |  | John Long              
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-02-010 February 28, 2002

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC ISSUES ìYELLOWî FINDING ON INDIAN POINT 2 OPERATOR TRAINING ISSUE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed its final significance determination of

an inspection finding at Entergy Northeastís Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant, related to the failure

of crews during a facility-administered annual licensed operator requalification exam last Fall. The

staff has determined that this finding should be characterized as ìyellow,î meaning it is an issue that,

when it occurred, was of substantial importance to safety and will result in additional NRC inspection. 

The finding stems from an NRC inspection conducted between October 22 and October 26

regarding the facility-administered annual licensed operator requalification examinations in which four

of seven crews failed. 

Under the NRC's new reactor oversight process, inspection findings are evaluated under a

significance determination process and assigned a color that indicates safety significance. Findings

with very low safety significance are labeled "green." "White" findings have low to moderate

importance to safety and may require additional NRC inspection. "Yellow" findings have substantial

safety significance, and "red" findings high safety significance. 

A preliminary "yellow" finding was described in an inspection report dated December 5 of last

year. The letter transmitting the report provided the company with an opportunity to either request a

regulatory conference to discuss this issue or to respond in writing. The company declined the

conference but did respond by letter.

Although the company did not agree with the preliminary NRC finding, the NRC reviewed

Entergyís response and concluded it was appropriate to characterize the finding as yellow. 

No violations of NRC requirements were identified because the operators were removed from

shift following the failures and were retrained as required. The NRC also acknowledged the company

has taken corrective actions to address the finding, including performing a root cause investigation and

initiating a four-week intensive training and evaluation program for all operators. 

Entergy has 10 days to appeal the NRCís significance determination. 

###
cc: Getiye Aschalew Dubale Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0113 - Final Rule: 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, and 150 - Exemptions from Licensing, General Licenses, and Distribution of Byproduct Material:  Licensing and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3150-AH41)

Accession Number: ML071760264

Date Released: Monday, July 23, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML071760269 - SECY-07-0113- Final Rule: 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, and 150 - Exemptions from Licensing, General Licenses, and Distribution of Byproduct Material:  Licensing and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3150-AH41) (9 page(s), 7/6/2007)
    - ML071760278 - SECY-07-0113 - Encl 1 - Federal Register Notice for Final Rule: 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, and 150 - Exemptions From Licensing, General Licenses, and Distribution of Byproduct Material:  Licensing and Reporting Requirements" (RIN 3150-AH41) (66 page(s), 7/6/2007)
    - ML071760296 - SECY-07-0113 Encl 2:  Regulatory Analysis re:  Final Rule - 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, and 150 - Exemptions From Licensing, General Licenses, and Distribution of Byproduct Material:  Licensing and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3150-AH41) (26 page(s), 1/1/2007)
    - ML071760348 - SECY-07-0113 Encl 3:  Environmental  Assessment re:  Final Rule:  10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, and 150 - Exemptions from Licensing, General Licenses, and Distribution of Byproduct Material; Licensing and Reporting Requirements (RIN 3150-AH41)  EDO Pkg. (7 page(s), 7/6/2007)
    - ML070360567 - SECY-07-0113 Encl 4: Congressional Review Act Forms (CRA) re:  Final Rule:  10 CFR Parts 30, 31, 32, and 150 - Exemptions From Licensing, General Licenses, and Distribution of Byproduct Material - Licensing and Reporting Requirements (6 page(s), 7/6/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 831.1611 Oversight of coverage determinations. ( a ) Upon deciding that a position is a customs and border protection officer position, the agency head must notify OPM (Attention: Associate Director, Retirement Services, or such other official as may be designated) stating the title of each position, occupational series, position description number (or other unique identifier), the number of incumbents, and whether the position is primary or secondary. The Director of OPM retains the authority to revoke the agency head's determination that a position is a primary or secondary position.
( b ) The Department of Homeland Security must establish and maintain a file containing all coverage determinations made by the agency head under § 831.1603 and § 831.1604, and all background material used in making the determination.
( c ) Upon request by OPM, the Department of Homeland Security will make available the entire coverage determination file for OPM to audit to ensure compliance with the provisions of this subpart.
( d ) Upon request by OPM, the Department of Homeland Security must submit to OPM a list of all covered positions and any other pertinent information requested.
Exhibit B

OMB No. 2025-0006

Expires xx/xx/xxxx 

EPA Form 5300-27 1

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Quality Assurance Reporting Form

for Use by Recipients of Assistance Agreements

Recipient Organization: 

Name:

Address:

EPA Award Number:

Project/Program Period(starting and ending dates, mm/dd/yyyy):

Activity Group: 

(check all that apply)

□ Infrastructure Development

□ Data Exchange, Analysis and Integration

□ Planning, Mentoring, and Training

□ Challenge

Goal Task Output Outcome Quality Assurance Measures

Instructions: - Please submit electronically to exchangenetwork@epa.gov within 90 days of award.

 - For Quality Assurance Measures, please refer to Solicitation Notice Appendix D: Quality Assurance Guidelines.

 - For Goals, please refer to goals outlined in your assistance agreement work plan.

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) Burden Statement: The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average one hour per response. Send comments 

on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated 

collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control 

number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.
Exhibit B

OMB No. 2025-0006

Expires xx/xx/xxxx 

EPA Form 5300-27 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ucluelet Explorations Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Heel, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 15, 2004

David Heel

/s/ David Heel______________________
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director 
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
### §185. Patent barred for filing without license

Notwithstanding any other provisions of law any person, and his successors, assigns, or legal representatives, shall not receive a United States patent for an invention if that person, or his successors, assigns, or legal representatives shall, without procuring the license prescribed in section 184, have made, or consented to or assisted another's making, application in a foreign country for a patent or for the registration of a utility model, industrial design, or model in respect of the invention. A United States patent issued to such person, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives shall be invalid, unless the failure to procure such license was through error, and the patent does not disclose subject matter within the scope of section 181.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 100–418, title IX, §9101(b)(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1568; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(a)(11), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1904; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(c), (j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 333, 335.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §155 (Feb. 1, 1952, ch. 4, §5, 66 Stat. 5).

Language is changed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "184" and after "181" and struck out "and without deceptive intent" after "error".

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 struck out second period at end.

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 inserted before period at end ", unless the failure to procure such license was through error and without deceptive intent, and the patent does not disclose subject matter within the scope of section 181 of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–418 applicable, subject to certain qualifications and exceptions, to all United States patents, and to all licenses under section 184 of this title, regardless of the date such patents or licenses are granted, and to all applications for such patents pending on or filed after Aug. 23, 1988, see section 9101(d) of Pub. L. 100–418, set out as a note under section 184 of this title.
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Ruairidh Campbell certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Allied Resources, Inc.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 14, 2007  

 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

| Ruairidh Campbell |
|-------------------|

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1598 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1598

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 
    Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in 
projects within the San Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Irvine Basin Surface and Groundwater 
Improvement Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1635 the following:

``SEC. 1636. IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT 
              PROJECTS.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Irvine 
Ranch Water District, California, is authorized to participate in the 
design, planning, and construction of projects to naturally treat 
impaired surface water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and 
provide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek Watershed.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the projects 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation or maintenance of a project authorized by this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1635 the 
following:
``1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement 
          projects.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §130101. Organization

(a) Federal Charter.—Ladies of the Grand Army of the Republic (in this chapter, the "corporation") is a federally chartered corporation.

(b) Place of Incorporation and Domicile.—The corporation is declared to be incorporated and domiciled in the District of Columbia.

(c) Perpetual Existence.—Except as otherwise provided, the corporation has perpetual existence.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1371.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130101 | 36:78. | June 17, 1959, Pub. L. 86–47, §§1, 2, 4(1), 73 Stat. 76, 77. |
| | 36:78a.36:78c(1). | |

Section

36:78c(1).

This section is substituted for the source provisions for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate executed and unnecessary words. The text of 36:78a is omitted as executed and obsolete.
#### § 294.401 References.

The table below provides assistance in locating other OPM regulations in title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations that have provisions on the disclosure of records:

| Type of information | Location |
| --- | --- |
| Classification appeal records | 511.616. |
| Classification information | 175.101. |
| Employee performance folders | 293.311. |
| Examination and related subjects records | 300.201. |
| Grade and pay retention records | 536.405. |
| Investigative records | 736.104. |
| Job grading reviews and appeals records | 532.707. |
| Medical information | 297.205 and 293 subpart E. |
| Official Personnel Folders | 293.311. |
| Privacy and personnel records | 297. |
| Retirement | 831.106 and 841.108. |

[54 FR 25098, June 13, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 32046, June 8, 1993; 70 FR 31286, May 31, 2005]
# L_2018142EN.01004001.xml

| 7.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 142/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 142/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 117/2017

of 13 June 2017

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2018/810]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the European Union regarding company law. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the European Union regarding company law.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2017, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2017,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 7(13) of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, the words ‘the financial year 2016’ are replaced by the words ‘the financial years 2016 and 2017’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2017.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-029 June 24, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE

OF COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION JULY 22

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Energy

Northwest on July 22 to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of safety performance at

the Columbia Generating Station. The plant is located near Richland, Washington.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. at the Energy Northwest Office Complex, Walkley

room, 3000 George Washington Way, Richland. The public is invited to observe the meeting

and NRC officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions

from the public.

"The meeting will give area residents a chance to hear first-hand how NRC inspectors

think the plant has been run from a safety standpoint. It is the plant's responsibility to operate in

a safe manner, and this is our report card on how they've done in the past year," said NRC

Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallet. 

The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition,

the NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Energy Northwest addresses the performance of the plant during

this period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wnp_2003q4.pdf

The NRC concluded that the plant operated safely last year and will receive routine

inspections during 2004. 
-2-

With regard to security issues, the letter points out that NRC has issued several orders and

threat advisories to enhance security capabilities at all nuclear power plants and improve guard

force readiness since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted

inspections to review the implementation of these requirements and has monitored the action of

plant operators in response to changing plant conditions. The NRC will continue security

inspections during 2004.

Current performance indicators for Columbia are available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WASH2/wash2_chart.html .

 ###