alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/21/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: SnowRiders International Meeting and Media Event on 11/20/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA Region 8 participated in a meeting and media event with SnowRiders International on 11/20/2014

to discuss their support of the proposed Clean Power Plan and accept the comments they have collected 

through their Powder Not Power Plants campaign. The meeting and media event were held in in Denver, 

Colorado, at EPA Region 8. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES:

EPA

Shaun McGrath, EPA Region 8 Regional Administrator

Carl Daly, EPA Region 8 Air Division Director

Laura Farris, EPA Region 8 Climate Change Coordinator

Joan Card, EPA Region 8 Senior Policy Advisor

External Stakeholders

Representatives of Arapahoe Basin Ski Area

Philip Huffeldt, Coordinator of Snowriders International

Julien Carr, Professional Skier

Jon Kahn, owner of Confluence Kayak and Ski

Others

Media event: As ski season opens, mountain communities and enthusiasts 

nationwide call for bold climate action.

Denver, CO – 11/18/14 – As the ski season opens, over 100 snow and mountain supporters across the 

country including ski areas, local businesses, professional winter sports athletes, local governments, and 

organizations have signed letters in support of bold action by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

to curb power plant emissions. Those letters, in support of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan, will be delivered 

to the EPA at a media event featuring some of the letter signers.

What: News conference announcing the delivery of coalition letters to the Regional EPA administrator 

in support of EPA rules on power plants as part of the Powder, Not Power Plants campaign.

Who: ski areas, local businesses, professional winter sports athletes, local governments, and 

organizations from across the country .

Speakers: 

Jon Kahn, owner of Confluence Kayak and Ski

Representatives of Arapahoe Basin Ski Area
Philip Huffeldt, Coordinator of Snowriders International

...possibly others such as an elected official

When: Thursday, November 20th at 11 AM

Where: Sidewalk in front of EPA Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street, 8P-AR

Denver, CO 80202

The entrance to EPA building is on 16th St next door to Office Depot.

Why: Release the letters and get diverse perspectives on why limiting carbon pollution from power 

plants—the single largest source of global warming pollution—is vital to protect public health, our 

environment, and the mountain way of life.

###

Snowriders International is an organization of skiers, boarders, and mountain recreation enthusiasts. We are 

dedicated to the promotion of winter sports and protection of the environment across the globe through service, 

education, research, and advocacy.

www.snowridersinternational.org
# L_2016341EN.01005301.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/53

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 157/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2192]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/217 of 10 April 2014 authorising Member States to adopt certain derogations pursuant to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/217 of 10 April 2014 authorising Member States to adopt certain derogations pursuant to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the inland transport of dangerous goods (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13c (Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 D 0217: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/217 of 10 April 2014 (OJ L 44, 18.2.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 D 0217: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/217 of 10 April 2014 (OJ L 44, 18.2.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/217 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 44, 18.2.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dry Dock Auto Co., Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph S.
Podolski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
      10, 2010
              By: /s/ Joseph S.
  PodolskiJoseph
      S. PodolskiChief
      Executive OfficerRepros
      Therapeutics Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Repros and will be retained by Repros and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Magic Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2004

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                             |
| Gordon Scott Venters           Principal Executive Officer and           Acting Principal Financial Officer |
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-041 February 29, 2008 

NRC ACCEPTS US-APWR DESIGN APPLICATION FOR REVIEW 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has accepted for review an application from 

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to certify the U.S. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor 

(US-APWR) design. The docket number assigned to this application is 52-021. 

 “We’re expecting an application later this year from a company that wants 

permission to build and operate a US-APWR in Texas,” said Bill Borchardt, Director of 

the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “The staff expects this design certification review 

will continue at least into 2011.” 

The US-APWR design, a similar version of which is currently under license 

review in Japan, is a nuclear power plant capable of producing about 1,700 megawatts of 

electricity. Mitsubishi submitted the application and associated information Dec. 31, 

2007. The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the 

NRC Web site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert/apwr.html . 

Docketing this application does not indicate whether the Commission will approve or 

reject the request. 

If the NRC certifies the US-APWR, a company applying for a license to build and 

operate a new nuclear power plant in the United States could choose to use the design and 

reference it in the application. Safety issues resolved within the scope of the design 

certification are not subject to litigation with respect to that individual license application, 

although site-specific design information and environmental impacts associated with 

building and operating the plant at a particular location could be litigated. NRC has 

certified four other standard reactor designs. 

The staff’s technical review will include requests for additional information, as 

needed, and the staff will issue a Safety Evaluation Report after all technical and safety 

questions have been resolved. The NRC would then certify the design through an agency 

rulemaking, which includes an opportunity for public participation. 
 The agency is currently reviewing General Electric’s Economic Simplified 

Boiling Water Reactor and Areva’s Evolutionary Power Reactor. Information about the 

design certification process is available on the NRC Web site here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert.html . The NRC’s regulations 

describe the certification process in Subpart B of Part 52, available on the agency’s Web 

site here: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part052/ . 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-41531

Summary Calendar

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR ANTONIO GODINEZ-GARCES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(B-97-CR-298-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________

March 2, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Edgar Antonio Godinez-Garces appeals his guilty-plea

conviction for being in the United States without permission after

having previously been deported. He argues that his conviction

should be vacated because the transcript of his guilty plea does

not contain specific responses to several of the Fed. R. Crim. P.

11 questions posed by the district court and that this court cannot

conduct a meaningful review of his guilty plea. He contends that
2

the error is not harmless because he is being denied his right to

an appeal. 

There is no right to appeal from a guilty plea in the

absence of a jurisdictional defect. Barrientos v. United States,

668 F.2d 838, 842 (5th Cir. 1982). Appeal is limited to a review

of Rule 11 errors. Id. at 843.

Rule 11 requires the district court to follow certain

procedures in determining whether a guilty plea is made knowingly

and voluntarily. United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 286, 298-300

(5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). Rule 11 ensures that the district court

addresses three core concerns: “(1) whether the guilty plea was

coerced; (2) whether the defendant understands the nature of the

charges; and (3) whether the defendant understands the consequences

of his plea.” Johnson, 1 F.3d at 300.

Although the district court asked many of the Rule 11

questions to the defendants as a group and the record does not

contain individual responses to several of the Rule 11 inquiries,

the transcript of Godinez-Garces’ guilty plea contains questions

specifically directed toward him regarding whether he was coerced,

whether he understood the nature of the charge against him, and

whether he understood the consequences of his plea. Godinez-Garces

answered appropriately. Moreover, his counsel was silent when the

court asked if anyone had objections to its procedure.

Furthermore, Godinez-Garces does not argue that the

district court varied from the required Rule 11 procedures or that

he did not understand any of the rights he was waiving. Godinez-
3

Garces’ argument that he is being denied his right to an appeal is

without merit and is in fact frivolous.

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
§ 715.202 Resignation. ( a ) *General.* An employee is free to resign at any time, to set the effective date of his resignation, and to have his reasons for resigning entered in his official records.
( b ) *Withdrawal of resignation.* An agency may permit an employee to withdraw his resignation at any time before it has become effective. An agency may decline a request to withdraw a resignation before its effective date only when the agency has a valid reason and explains that reason to the employee. A valid reason includes, but is not limited to, administrative disruption or the hiring or commitment to hire a replacement. Avoidance of adverse action proceedings is not a valid reason.
[33 FR 12482, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 36 FR 9765, May 28, 1971; 38 FR 18446, July 11, 1973; 38 FR 26601, Sept. 24, 1973]
### **CHAPTER 37—NATIONAL STAGE**

Sec.
371.
National stage: Commencement.
372.
National stage: Requirements and procedure.
[373.
Repealed.]
374.
Publication of international application.
375.
Patent issued on international application: Effect.
376.
Fees.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2013**—Pub. L. 112–274, §1(i), Jan. 14, 2013, 126 Stat. 2457, struck out item 373 "Improper applicant".

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4507(12)], as added by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13205(2)(F), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1903, substituted "Publication of international application" for "Publication of international application: Effect" in item 374.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-05-051 October 14, 2005 

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC NAMES HUNEGS SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT FITZPATRICK;

NAMES CLINE SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR AT NINE MILE POINT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have assigned Gordon

Hunegs as the senior resident inspector at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant; and assigned

Leonard Cline as the senior resident inspector at the Nine Mile Point nuclear plant. Both plants are in

Scriba, N.Y.

 Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections and monitoring plant

operations. The resident inspectors can be assigned to any one site for a total of about seven years. 

“Both Hunegs and Cline have the experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC

ensure that Nine Mile Point and FitzPatrick conduct operations with the highest safety standards to

protect the public health and safety," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins.

Hunegs joined the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta in 1986 as a project engineer. He has

been assigned as a resident inspector at Indian Point 3 in Buchanan, N.Y., and as a senior resident

inspector at Indian Point 2 and FitzPatrick. Most recently, he was senior resident inspector at Nine

Mile Point. Hunegs served in the United States Navy for seven years. He is a graduate of the United

States Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md. 

Cline joined the NRC in 1999 as a reactor engineer in the Region I office in King of Prussia. 

He was then assigned as a reactor inspector in the performance evaluation branch in the Region’s

Division of Reactor Safety. He was a resident inspector at the Calvert Cliffs site in Lusby, Md. Prior

to his assignment to Nine Mile Point, Cline was the senior resident inspector at FitzPatrick. Before

joining the NRC, he was an officer in the United States Navy, where he completed the Navy’s nuclear

training program. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Pennsylvania State

University. 
-2-

Hunegs joins Resident Inspector Douglas Dempsey at FitzPatrick. They can be reached at

315/342-4907. 

Cline joins Resident Inspectors Brian Fuller and Ed Knutson at Nine Mile Point. They can be

reached at 315/342-4041.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24656]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[VA155-5081a; FRL-7834-6]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Virginia; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule to approve reasonable available control technology (RACT) to limit 
nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X</INF>) emissions from two individual sources 
located in Fairfax County, Virginia, namely, the Central Intelligence 
Agency, and the National Reconnaissance Office. In the direct final 
rule published on September 9, 2004 (69 FR 54574), we stated that if we 
received adverse comment by October 12, 2004, the rule would be 
withdrawn and not take effect. EPA received adverse comments on October 
12, 2004. EPA will address the comments received in a subsequent final 
action based upon the proposed action also published on September 9, 
2004 (69 FR 54600). EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
this action.

DATES: The Direct final rule is withdrawn as of November 4, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dcada9b5b2a8b3f2aeb3afb99cb9acbdf2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1667637f78627938647965735673667738717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, 
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 29, 2004.
James W. Newsom,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA withdraws the revision 
of the entries for the Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, George Bush 
Center for Intelligence; and the National Reconnaissance Office, Boeing 
Service Center in Sec.  52.2420(d) published at 69 FR 54578 (September 
9, 2004).

[FR Doc. 04-24656 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
(April 6, 1948.)

#### Francesco Di Lauro, Appellant, v. Louis A. Pharao et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3



I, Michael D. Lockhart, certify that:



|1) | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3) | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                  |  |                                            
|----- |  | ---------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 4, 2004 |  |                                            
|      |  |                  |  | /s/ Michael D. Lockhart                    
|      |  |                  |  | Michael D. Lockhart Chief Executive
Officer
#### Christine M. Hetzer, Appellant, v. Gertrude I. Hetzer, Respondent.

In our opinion the amount of $780 for “ Managerial expense ”, and the amount of $724.50 for interest on moneys expended by respondent in connection with the conveyance of the property by appellant to her were not proper credits as items which respondent was required to pay in order to “keep and carry ” the property. She did not pay out these moneys and she was not entitled, under the terms of the contract, to retain such sums, either for her services or as interest. Present — Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.