### 64591 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Notices

application, or a change of a person assigned to a key project staff position (see section VI.A.2.).

8. A change in or temporary absence of the person responsible for managing and reporting on the grant’s finances.

9. A change in the name of the grantee organization.

10. A transfer or contracting out of grant-supported activities (see subsection H. below).

11. A transfer of the grant to another recipient.

12. Pre-agreement costs (see section VII.I.2.a.).

13. The purchase of automated data processing equipment and software (see section VII.I.2.b.).

14. Consultant rates (see section VII.I.2.c.).

15. A change in the nature or number of the products to be prepared or the manner in which a product would be
distributed.

B. Requests for Grant Adjustments

All grantees must promptly notify SJI, in writing, of events or proposed changes that may require adjustments to the approved project design. In requesting an adjustment, the grantee
must set forth the reasons and basis for the proposed adjustment and any other information the program manager determines would help SJI’s review.

C. Notification of Approval/Disapproval

If the request is approved, the grantee will be sent a Grant Adjustment signed by the SJI Executive Director. If the request is denied, the grantee will be sent a written explanation of the reasons
for the denial.

D. Changes in the Scope of the Grant

Major changes in scope, duration, training methodology, or other significant areas must be approved in advance by SJI. A grantee may make minor changes in methodology, approach, or other aspects of the grant to expedite achievement of the grant’s objectives with subsequent notification to SJI.

E. Date Changes

A request to change or extend the grant period must be made at least 30 days in advance of the end date of the grant. A revised task plan should accompany a request for an extension of the grant period, along with a revised budget if shifts among budget categories will be needed. A request to change or
extend the deadline for the final financial report or final progress report must be made at least 14 days in advance of the report deadline (see section VII.L.2.). F. Temporary Absence of the Project

Director

Whenever an absence of the project director is expected to exceed a continuous period of one month, the plans for the conduct of the project director’s duties during such absence must be approved in advance by the
Institute. This information must be provided in a letter signed by an authorized representative of the grantee/ sub-grantee at least 30 days before the departure of the project director, or as soon as it is known that the project director will be absent. The grant may be terminated if arrangements are not approved in advance by SJI.

G. Withdrawal of/Change in Project

Director

If the project director relinquishes or expects to relinquish active direction of the project, SJI must be notified immediately. In such cases, if the grantee/sub-grantee wishes to terminate the project, SJI will forward procedural instructions upon notification of such intent. If the grantee wishes to continue the project under the direction of another individual, a statement of the candidate’s qualifications should be sent to SJI for review and approval. The grant may be terminated if the qualifications of the proposed individual are not approved in advance by SJI.

H. Transferring or Contracting Out of Grant-Supported Activities

No principal activity of a grantsupported project may be transferred or contracted out to another organization without specific prior approval by SJI. All such arrangements must be
formalized in a contract or other written agreement between the parties involved. Copies of the proposed contract or agreement must be submitted for prior approval of SJI at the earliest possible time. The contract or agreement must state, at a minimum, the activities to be performed, the time schedule, the policies and procedures to be followed, the dollar limitation of the agreement, and the cost principles to be followed in determining what costs, both direct and indirect, will be allowed. The contract or other written agreement must not affect the grantee’s overall responsibility for the direction of the project and accountability to SJI.

State Justice Institute Board of

Directors

James R. Hannah (Chairman), Chief Justice,

Supreme Court of Arkansas, Little Rock,

AR Daniel J. Becker (Vice Chairman), State Court Administrator, Utah Administrative Office of the Courts, Salt Lake City, UT Gayle A. Nachtigal (Secretary), Senior Circuit

Court Judge, Washington County Circuit Court, Hillsboro, OR Hernan D. Vera (Treasurer), President & CEO,

Public Counsel Law Center, Los Angeles,

CA Chase T. Rogers, Chief Justice, Supreme

Court of Connecticut, Hartford, CT Jonathan Lippman, Chief Judge of the State

of New York, New York, NY David V. Brewer, Justice, Oregon Supreme

Court, Salem, OR Wilfredo Martinez, County Judge, 9th

Judicial Circuit of Florida, Orlando, FL Marsha J. Rabiteau, Executive Director, Legal

Policy Strategies Group, Bloomfield, CT John B. Nalbandian, Partner, Taft Stettinius

& Hollister LLP, Cincinnati, OH Isabel Framer, President, Language Access

Consultants LLC, Copley, OH Jonathan D. Mattiello, Executive Director (ex

officio)

Jonathan D. Mattiello,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2013–25461 Filed 10–28–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Intent To Rule on Change in Use of Aeronautical Property at**  **Bowman Field Airport, Louisville, KY**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Request for public comment.

**SUMMARY :**  The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public comment on request by the Louisville Regional Airport Authority to temporarily change a portion of airportproperty from aeronautical to nonaeronautical use at the Bowman Field Airport, Louisville, Kentucky. The request consists approximately of 0.41 acres of temporary use. This action is taken under the provisions of Section
125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before November 29, 2013.

**ADDRESSES :**  Documents are available for review at the Louisville Regional Airport Authority, 700 Administration Drive, Louisville, KY 40209; and the FAA Memphis Airports District Office, 2600 Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 2250, Memphis, TN 38118–2482. Written comments on the Sponsor’s request must be delivered or mailed to: Mr. Phillip J. Braden, Manager, Memphis Airports District Office, 2600


### 64592 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Notices

Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 2250, Memphis, TN 38118–2482.

In addition, a copy of any comments
submitted to the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr. Charles T. Miller, Executive Director, Louisville Regional Airport Authority, P.O. Box 9129, Louisville, KY 40209.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Tommy L. Dupree, Team Lead/Civil Engineer, Federal Aviation Administration, Memphis Airports District Office, 2600, Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 2250, Memphis, TN 38118–2482. The application may be reviewed in person at this same location, by appointment.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the request to lease property for non-aeronautical purposes at Bowman Field Airport, Louisville, KY 42103. Under the provisions of AIR 21 (49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2)).

On September 30, 2013, the FAA determined that the request to lease property for non-aeronautical purposes at Bowman Field Airport meets the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in part, no later than November 29, 2013.

The following is a brief overview of the request:

The Louisville Regional Airport Authority is proposing the lease of approximately 0.41 acres, a partial of Parcel 48, bounded by Roger E. Schupp Street to the north, Dutchman’s Lane to the south, Tucker Boulevard to the east,
and Gast Boulevard to the west. The non-aeronautical lease is for a period of 5 (five) years, with an option of 5 (five) years that can be exercised by the airport authority. The non-aeronautical lease is for the purpose of leasing said property to an adjacent land owner, The Jewish Family & Career Services of Louisville, Inc., to be used as a parking
lot.

Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under **FOR**

**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**

.

Issued in Memphis, TN on September 30,

2013. Phillip J. Braden,
Manager, Memphis Airports District Office, Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 2013–25585 Filed 10–28–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Highway Administration**

**Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on the Stehekin Valley Road**  **Improvement Project From the**
**Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan: Chelan County,**  **Washington**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT) and other Federal agencies.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Limitations on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA and other Federal agencies.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces final environmental actions taken by the FHWA, the National Park Service (NPS),
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS), and other Federal agencies that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. § 139( l)(1). The actions relate to the Stehekin Valley Road Improvement project from the Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan in Chelan County, Washington. This action grants approval for the road improvement project element of the plan.

**DATES :**  By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139( l )(1). A claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the roadway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before March 28, 2014. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 150 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period still applies.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Michelle Eraut, Acting Environmental Program Manager, FHWA, 610 East 5th Street, Vancouver, WA, Telephone: (360) 619–7967. For the NPS: Roy M. Zipp, Environmental Protection Specialist, North Cascades National Park, 810 State Route 20, Sedro-Wolley, WA 98284, Telephone: 360–854–7313. For the USF&WS, Greg Kurz, Central Washington Field Office, 215 Melody Lane, Suite 119, Wenatchee, WA 98801, Telephone: (509) 665–3508. The FHWA Stehekin Valley Road Improvement Project Record of Decision, NPS Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD), is available upon written request from the Federal Highway Administration at the
address shown above. Comments or questions concerning this proposed
action should be directed to the FHWA at the address provided above. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Notice is hereby given that the FHWA, has taken final agency action subject to 23 U.S.C. § 139( l)(1) by issuing approval for the following highway project in the State of Washington: Stehekin Valley Road Improvement Project. The project is a component of the Stehekin River Corridor Implementation Plan (Plan) in
the Lake Chelan National Recreation Area for which the U.S. Department of
Interior National Park Service issued a Record of Decision dated March 13, 2013. FHWA served as a cooperating agency in the development of the EIS, and issued a FHWA Record of Decision,dated September 27, 2013. FHWAadministered funds will be used for the project and FHWA will administer the construction contact. The project will realign 1.8 miles of the existing 10 mile alignment, moving this section outside
of the Stehekin River’s channel migration zone to reduce flooding by the river and, consequently, the threat to public safety and access and
maintenance costs. Another 7.4 miles of the road will undergo minor improvements including resurfacing and culvert replacement within the existing roadway prism. In addition, a 1200-foot long connector road will be built to provide access between the realigned portion of the road and the existing alignment. The actions by the Federal agencies and the laws under
which such actions were taken are
described in the Record of Decision issued on September 27, 2013. The NPS EIS, NPS ROD, and the FHWA ROD, are available by contacting the FHWA at the address provided above. This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions
as of the issuance date of this notice and
all laws under which such actions were taken, including but not limited to:

1. General: National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C 4321– 4347]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].

2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401– 7671(q)].

3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 [23 U.S.C. 138 and 49 U.S.C. 303]; Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (LWCF) [16

U.S.C. 460 l –4—460 l –11.].

4. Wildlife: Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531–1544]; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act [16 U.S.C. 661–667 (e)]; Migratory Bird Treaty Act [16 U.S.C. 703–712].

5. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq. ]; Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1977 [16