alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, John McLeod, certify that:

1.          
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas
Corporation.;

2.          
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.          
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.          
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and I have:

a)          
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)          
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)          
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.

5.          
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)           all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October 22, 2007

/s/ John McLeodJohn
McLeod, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

p0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144719

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 14 4719

COA: 307808

Oakland CC: 2011

- 236620

- FH

PHILLIPS EDMOND,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
V 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1658

To amend the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance Validation Act to validate 

additional conveyances of certain lands in the State of California that 

form part of the right-of-way granted by the United States to facilitate 

the construction of the transcontinental railway, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2003

Mr. POMBO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance Validation 

Act to validate additional conveyances of certain lands 

in the State of California that form part of the rightof-way granted by the United States to facilitate the 

construction of the transcontinental railway, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Right-of-Way 

5 Conveyance Validation Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1658 IH 

1 SEC. 2. VALIDATION OF ADDITIONAL RAILROAD CONVEY2 ANCES, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 

3 Section 4 of the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance 

4 Validation Act (Private Law 103–2; 108 Stat. 5061) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new para6 graphs: 

7 ‘‘(9) The conveyance entered into between the 

8 Central Pacific Railway Company and the Southern 

9 Pacific Transportation Company and the Bank of 

10 America, as trustee of the last will and testament of 

11 Aaron Herschel, recorded September 27, 1945, in 

12 volume 942 at page 104 of the official records of the 

13 county of San Joaquin. 

14 ‘‘(10) The conveyance entered into between the 

15 Central Pacific Railway Company and the Southern 

16 Pacific Transportation Company and the Tri-Valley 

17 Packing Association, recorded November 13, 1957, 

18 in volume 2016 at page 149 of the official records 

19 of the county of San Joaquin.’’.

Æ
### §140705. Governing body

(a) Board of Directors.—The board of directors and the responsibilities of the board are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(b) Officers.—The officers and the election of officers are as provided in the articles of incorporation.

(c) Nondiscrimination.—The requirements for serving as a director or officer may not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability, age, or national origin.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1385.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 140705(a) | 36:5006. | Oct. 23, 1992, Pub. L. 102–484, title XVIII, §§1806, 1807, 1808 (related to directors and officers), 106 Stat. 2582. |
| 140705(b) | 36:5007. | |
| 140705(c) | 36:5008 (related to directors and officers). | |

Section

In subsections (a) and (b), the words "Except as provided in section 5008 of this title" and "in conformity with the laws of the State in which it is incorporated" are omitted as unnecessary.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-025 March 9, 2001

NRC’s ACRS PLANT LICENSE RENEWAL SUBCOMMITTEE MEETS MARCH 27, 28;

REVISES AGENDA FOR MARCH 16 JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) has

scheduled a meeting of its subcommittee on plant license renewal for March 27 and 28 in Rockville,

Maryland. In addition, the Committee has revised the agenda for the March 16 joint meeting in

Rockville of its subcommittees on materials and metallurgy, thermal-hydraulic phenomena, and

reliability and probabilistic risk assessment.

All of the meetings, which will be open to the public, will begin at 8:30 a.m. in

Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike.

On March 27, the subcommittee will review selected boiling water reactor Vessel and Internals

Project reports applicable to the Edwin I. Hatch nuclear power plant license renewal application and the

proposed final revisions of license renewal regulatory guidance documents, including:

-- the Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) report,

-- the Standard Review Plan and Regulatory Guide for license renewal,

-- and the Nuclear Energy Institute’s “Industry Guideline for Implementing

the Requirements of 10 CFR Part 54 -- The License Renewal Rule.”

The following day, the subcommittee will discuss the draft Safety Evaluation Report for the

Southern Nuclear Operating Company’s license renewal application for Hatch Units 1 and 2.

The previously announced agenda for the March 16 joint session of subcommittees has been

revised to include a discussion of the proposed final ACRS report on the NRC Safety Research

Program, from 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Those who wish to make oral or written statements, or seek additional information on the March

27 and 28 subcommittee meeting or changes to the agenda, should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-

415-7364. For further information on the March 16 joint meeting of subcommittees, contact Michael

Markley at 301-415-6885.
ACRS meeting notices and letter reports are available on the internet, at

http://www.nrc.gov/ACRSACNW/ .

###
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eduardo Avila, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Date: January 14, 2010

/S/ Eduardo AvilaSignature: Eduardo
Avila Title: Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

---
#### Samuel H. Pardes, Inc., Appellant, v. Henley Fashions, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
### §22. Bayou Meto, Arkansas

The Bayou Meto, in the State of Arkansas, is declared to be a nonnavigable stream within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

(Aug. 8, 1917, ch. 49, §16, 40 Stat. 268.)
#### § 730.101 Purpose.

This part implements 5 U.S.C. 7302, which requires agencies to provide written notice to senior executives and other individuals covered by 18 U.S.C. 207(c)(2)(A)(ii) that they are subject to certain post-employment conflict-of-interest restrictions in 18 U.S.C. 207(c).
### §20929. Election by Indian tribes

#### (a) Election

#### (1) In general

A federally recognized Indian tribe may, by resolution or other enactment of the tribal council or comparable governmental body—

(A) elect to carry out this part as a jurisdiction subject to its provisions; or

(B) elect to delegate its functions under this part to another jurisdiction or jurisdictions within which the territory of the tribe is located and to provide access to its territory and such other cooperation and assistance as may be needed to enable such other jurisdiction or jurisdictions to carry out and enforce the requirements of this part.

#### (2) Imputed election in certain cases

A tribe shall be treated as if it had made the election described in paragraph (1)(B) if—

(A) it is a tribe subject to the law enforcement jurisdiction of a State under section 1162 of title 18;

(B) the tribe does not make an election under paragraph (1) within 1 year of July 27, 2006 or rescinds an election under paragraph (1)(A); or

(C) the Attorney General determines that the tribe has not substantially implemented the requirements of this part and is not likely to become capable of doing so within a reasonable amount of time.

#### (b) Cooperation between tribal authorities and other jurisdictions

#### (1) Nonduplication

A tribe subject to this part is not required to duplicate functions under this part which are fully carried out by another jurisdiction or jurisdictions within which the territory of the tribe is located.

#### (2) Cooperative agreements

A tribe may, through cooperative agreements with such a jurisdiction or jurisdictions—

(A) arrange for the tribe to carry out any function of such a jurisdiction under this part with respect to sex offenders subject to the tribe's jurisdiction; and

(B) arrange for such a jurisdiction to carry out any function of the tribe under this part with respect to sex offenders subject to the tribe's jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title I, §127, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 599.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§111–131) of title I of Pub. L. 109–248, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 591, which is classified principally to this part. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16927 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-07-039 July 12, 2007

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTORS

 TO INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Region I Office has assigned Paul C. Cataldo as the new

senior resident inspector and Christopher A. Hott as the new resident inspector at the Indian Point 3

nuclear power plant in Buchanan, N.Y. Indian Point Energy Center, which has two operating nuclear

power units, is operated by Entergy Nuclear Northeast. 

“Both Paul Cataldo and Chris Hott have extensive technical and regulatory experience, and

have demonstrated dedication to safety to carry out NRC’s commitment to protect people and the

environment," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. “They are our eyes and ears on site,

monitoring daily operations.” 

Most recently, Mr. Cataldo was the NRC’s senior resident inspector at the Beaver Valley

nuclear power plant in Shippingport, Pa. Prior to that, he was a resident inspector at the Millstone

nuclear power plant in Waterford, Conn. He joined the NRC’s Region III office near Chicago in 1996

as an operator licensing examiner.

Prior to joining the agency, Mr. Cataldo was a test reactor operator at the University of

Massachusetts-Lowell. He also has experience in the manufacturing industry, in which he performed,

among other things, quality assurance inspections between 1989 and 1993. Mr. Cataldo also served as a

machinist's mate aboard a U.S. Navy nuclear attack submarine. He is a graduate of the University of

Massachusetts-Lowell with a bachelor's degree in nuclear engineering.

Mr. Hott’s previous assignment was as a project engineer in the NRC Region I Division of

Reactor Projects. He joined the agency in 2003. He has worked as a reactor inspector in the Division

of Reactor Safety and as a nuclear materials inspector in the Division of Nuclear Materials and Safety.

Before coming to the NRC, Mr. Hott spent 9 years in the United States Navy nuclear program. 

He holds a double-major bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering and engineering physics from

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y.
Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They are

assigned to each facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and interacting with

plant workers and the public.

The Indian Point 3 resident inspectors can be reached at 914/739-8565. 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Exhibit 10.21

                       Amendment to Coal Supply Agreement


     This Amendment is entered into effective January 1, 2004,  between Southern
Indiana Gas and Electric Company (Buyer) and Vectren Fuels,  Inc., f/k/a SIGCORP
Fuels, Inc. (Seller) and evidences as follows:

     WHEREAS,  on January 19, 2000,  Buyer and Seller entered into a Coal Supply
Agreement  whereby Seller sells coal produced by the  Prosperity  Mine to Buyer;
and

     WHEREAS, the parties intend to continue this arrangement under the terms of
the Coal Supply Agreement, as amended hereby; and

     WHEREAS, in accordance with a 1999 Letter Agreement, Buyer has reviewed the
terms hereof with the OUCC;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Buyer and Seller agree as follows:

     1. The parties have renewed the Agreement  for an  additional  two (2) year
period,  ending  December  31,  2005.  Buyer  reserves  its right to extend  the
Agreement  through  December  31,  2008,  subject to the  parties'  agreement on
pricing for that additional term.

     2. The  parties  agree that  Section 6.1 of the Coal  Supply  Agreement  is
superceded and replaced with the following provision:

          6.1  Price.  The Base Price of fuel per  million  BTU's  delivered  to
     Buyer's Generating Stations during the term of the Agreement is as follows:

                             2004 $1.2010 per MMBtu

                             2005 $1.2615 per MMBtu

     3. All other  terms and  conditions  of the Coal  Supply  Agreement  remain
unmodified and will apply throughout the term of the Agreement.

     In  Witness  Whereof,  Buyer  and  Seller  have  agreed  to these  terms as
evidenced by the signatures of their authorized representatives set forth below:

VECTREN FUELS, INC.                   SOUTHERN INDIANA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY



By:  /s/ Randy L. Beck                By: /s/ Ronald G. Jochum
   -----------------------------         ---------------------------------------
     Randy L. Beck                        Ronald G. Jochum
### §150902. Purposes

The purposes of the corporation are—

(1) to collect, analyze, develop, and disseminate in the public interest information and recommendations about—

(A) protection against radiation; and

(B) radiation measurements, quantities, and units, particularly those concerned with protection against radiation;

(2) to provide a means by which organizations concerned with the scientific and related aspects of protection against radiation and of radiation quantities, units, and measurements may cooperate for effective use of their combined resources, and to stimulate the work of those organizations;

(3) to develop basic concepts about—

(A) radiation quantities, units, and measurements;

(B) the application of those concepts; and

(C) protection against radiation; and

(4) to cooperate with the International Commission on Radiological Protection, the Federal Radiation Council, the International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements, and other national and international organizations, governmental and private, concerned with radiation quantities, units, and measurements and with protection against radiation.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1395.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 150902 | 36:4503. | July 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–376, §3, 78 Stat. 321. |

Section

In this section, the word "objects" is omitted as unnecessary. The words "protection against radiation" are used throughout, and the words "(referred to herein as 'radiation protection')" in 36:4503(1) are omitted, for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
Steven J. Combs 01/12/2016

Droneview LLC

13550 Donop Road

Elmendorf TX 78112

(208) 610-6285

sccombs@earthlink.net

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Filed with www.regulations.gov

Re: Request for modification of Exemption No.11403, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0148.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Droneview LLC requests a modification of the above exemption number in the respect of adding 

an additional UAV to the business.

The UAV is the DJI Inspire 1 Pro which in all practical aspects of the flight characteristics is the 

same as the Phantom 2 Vision + and the Phantom 3 Professional in which Droneview was 

granted its exemption and subsequent amendment.

The differences from the Phantom 2 Vision +, the Phantom 3 professional and the DJI inspire 1 

Pro is mainly the camera system and the camera system software. All of the previous safety 

standards and features from the Phantom 2 Vision + and the Phantom 3 Professional are 

incorporated into the DJI Inspire 1 Pro as well as some easier to use and more intuitive remote 

control functions.

Droneview LLC will incorporate the Inspire 1 Professional into its business using the same pilot 

training and rigorous inspection procedures outlined in the original documents submitted under 

the Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-0148 with separate and serial number specific checklists and 

maintenance records.

The operator’s manual for the DJI Inspire 1 Professional as well as the quick start manual and

the current safety guidelines for use are available online at:

http://www.dji.com/product/inspire-1-pro-and-raw/info#downloads

The file size is 20.82 Mb and will not upload to the Regulations.gov website as it’s too large.

If you have any questions, please contact me at the information above.
Sincerely,

Steven J. Combs