alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Teryl Resources Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Registration Statement and Annual Report on Form 20-F,
  as amended by this Amendment No. 3 on Form 20-F/A of Teryl Resources Corp. for
  the year ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, BC, Canada                 
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|by: /s/ John G. Robertson            
|January 21, 2008.                    
|                                     
|John G. Robertson                    
|                                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained by Teryl
Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Respondent, *v.*Tailored Woman, Inc., Appellant. 754 Fifth Avenue, Inc., Respondent, v. Tailored Woman, Inc., Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

The defendant appeals from two orders in related actions against the same defendant, requiring it to furnish bills of particulars. The notices of motion comprise thirty pages of the record on appeal, and call for answers to 208 topical demands, many of which demands would require the supplying of numerous items. Not only are these demands in some instances repetitious, but in numerous cases, both where allowed and disallowed by Special Term, they are improper and onerous, and drawn with the manifest purpose of imposing an unreasonable and almost insuperable obstacle to the establishment of these defenses. The language is appropriate here which this court used in *American Mint Co.*v. *Ex-Lax, Inc.*(260 App. Div. 576, 577) that the “ demand, both in its form and in its extent, is so unreasonable, meticulous, unnecessarily repetitious, and burdensome that it should have been denied in its entirety as it constitutes a plain abuse of the right to a bill of particulars. To grant it in its present form would not help properly to limit and clarify the issues and.the proof but would serve confusion and prolixity.”

The orders, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the plaintiffs’ motions, based upon the present notices of motion, denied *in toto,*with leave to plaintiffs to renew the motions, restricting their applications on such renewal to proper, reasonable and nonrepetitious demands.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Orders unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the plaintiffs’ motions, based upon the present notices of motion, denied *in toto,*with leave to the plaintiffs to renew the motions, restricting their applications on such renewals to proper, reasonable and nonrepetitious demands.
Exhibit No. 24

ARMSTRONG HOLDINGS, INC.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING

POWER OF ATTORNEY

I, Walter T. Gangl,
Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Armstrong Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that a meeting of the Board of Directors of said corporation duly
held on the 16thday of April, 2007, at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, the following resolution
was adopted and is now in full force and effect.

RESOLVED That the form of the Companys 2006 annual report on Form 10-K reviewed by
the Board is approved, and the execution thereof on behalf of the Company, with such changes therein and additions or deletions thereto as legal counsel to the Company may approve, and the filing thereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
after being executed by the requisite number of directors personally or by their respective attorneys-in-fact, are authorized.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and the seal of said corporation this 16thday of April, 2007.



/s/ Walter T. GanglWalter T. GanglDeputy General Counsel andAssistant Secretary




---

Exhibit No. 24

ARMSTRONG HOLDINGS, INC.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

RE: 2006 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

I, Michael D.
Lockhart, as a Director of Armstrong Holdings, Inc., do hereby constitute and appoint, JOHN N. RIGAS or, in the case of his absence or inability to act as such, WALTER T. GANGL, my agent, to sign in my name and on my behalf the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and any amendments thereto, to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the same effect as if such
signature were made by me personally.



/s/ Michael D. LockhartMichael D. LockhartDated: April 16, 2007


All powers of attorney required to be filed are substantially identical in all material respects. Therefore,
in accordance with SEC Regulation 229.601(a) Instruction 2, only the foregoing copy is being included except, however, that the manually signed copy filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission includes a complete set of powers of attorney.

All powers of attorney differ only from the form of the foregoing in that they are executed by the following parties in the capacities and on the dates as
indicated.



|                  |  |          |  |               
|----------------- |  | -------- |  | --------------
|M. Edward Sellers |  | Director |  | March 27, 2007
|Jerre L. Stead    |  | Director |  | March 26, 2007
### §20981. Pilot program for monitoring sexual offenders

#### (a) Sex offender monitoring program

#### (1) Grants authorized

#### (A) In general

The Attorney General is authorized to award grants (referred to as "Jessica Lunsford and Sarah Lunde Grants") to States, local governments, and Indian tribal governments to assist in—

(i) carrying out programs to outfit sex offenders with electronic monitoring units; and

(ii) the employment of law enforcement officials necessary to carry out such programs.

#### (B) Duration

The Attorney General shall award grants under this section for a period not to exceed 3 years.

#### (C) Minimum standards

The electronic monitoring units used in the pilot program shall at a minimum—

(i) provide a tracking device for each offender that contains a central processing unit with global positioning system; and

(ii) permit continuous monitoring of offenders 24 hours a day.

#### (2) Application

#### (A) In general

Each State, local government, or Indian tribal government desiring a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require.

#### (B) Contents

Each application submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall—

(i) describe the activities for which assistance under this section is sought; and

(ii) provide such additional assurances as the Attorney General determines to be essential to ensure compliance with the requirements of this section.

#### (b) Innovation

In making grants under this section, the Attorney General shall ensure that different approaches to monitoring are funded to allow an assessment of effectiveness.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 2009 to carry out this section.

#### (2) Report

Not later than September 1, 2010, the Attorney General shall report to Congress—

(A) assessing the effectiveness and value of this section;

(B) comparing the cost effectiveness of the electronic monitoring to reduce sex offenses compared to other alternatives; and

(C) making recommendations for continuing funding and the appropriate levels for such funding.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title VI, §621, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 633; Pub. L. 110–400, §4(a), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4227.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16981 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a)(1)(C). Pub. L. 110–400, §4(a), amended subpar. (C) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (C) set minimum standards for electronic monitoring units used in the pilot program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110–400, §4(b), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4228, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply to grants provided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 13, 2008]."
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Adira Energy Ltd. (the Company) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Gadi
Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (i)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and               
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: April 26, 2012 | /s/
      Gadi Levin         
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|                     | Gadi Levin                   
|                     | Chief Financial Officer      
|                     | (principal financial officer)

---
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0567 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-272-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Leading edge fluid 

drainage 

modification

22.0 $1,870.0

0

651 $2,521.00 361 $910,081.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $910,081

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
# C_2015310EN.01000101.xml

| 19.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreements between the European Union and the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Turkey on the participation of, respectively, Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia and Turkey in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’

(2015/C 310/01)

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Albania on the participation of the Republic of Albania in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ was ratified by Albania on 5 August 2014 following which it entered retroactively into force on 1 January 2014.

The Agreement between the European Union and Bosnia and Herzegovina on the participation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ was ratified by Bosnia and Herzegovina on 10 June 2015 following which it entered retroactively into force on 1 January 2014.

The Agreement between the European Union and Montenegro on the participation of Montenegro in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ was signed by Montenegro on 1 July 2014 following which it entered retroactively into force on 1 January 2014.

The Agreement between the European Union and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on the participation of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ was signed by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on 1 July 2014 following which it entered retroactively into force on 1 January 2014.

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Serbia on the participation of the Republic of Serbia in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ was ratified by Serbia on 16 September 2014 following which it entered retroactively into force on 1 January 2014.

The Agreement between the European Union and Turkey on the participation of Turkey in the Union programme ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)’ was ratified by Turkey on 23 July 2014 following which it entered retroactively into force on 1 January 2014.

---
# L_2017308EN.01003701.xml

| 23.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 130/2016

of 3 June 2016

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2017/2148]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2010 of 11 November 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1708/2005 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 as regards the common index reference period for the harmonised index of consumer prices (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2010 of 11 November 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1708/2005 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 as regards the common index reference period for the harmonised index of consumer prices (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 19v (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1708/2005) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 R 2010: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2010 of 11 November 2015 (OJ L 295, 12.11.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 R 2010: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2010 of 11 November 2015 (OJ L 295, 12.11.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/2010 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 June 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 295, 12.11.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1668

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 4, 2003

Received 

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 

North Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ed 

Edmondson United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1668 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 101 North 

3 Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, shall be known and 

4 designated as the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States Court5 house’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States 

11 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 3, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
# L_2017336EN.01000101.xml

| 16.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 336/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 336/1

---

Information on the date of signature of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius

The Protocol (1) setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius was signed on 8 December 2017.

1

The Protocol applies provisionally from 8 December 2017, date of signature, in accordance with its Article 15.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 279, 28.10.2017, p. 3.

1

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Gerald Lau, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Sean Webster, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of
Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Biopack Environmental
      Solutions Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                 

Dated: March 31, 2010

| | /s/
      Gerald Lau                                       
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Gerald Lau, President and Chief Executive
      Officer    
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                              
| |                                                            
| |                                                            
| | /s/
      Sean Webster                                     
| | Sean Webster                                               
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Biopack
Environmental Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Biopack Environmental
Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
### §40743. Expungement of profiles

The expungement requirements under section 12592(d) of this title shall apply to any DNA profile or DNA data collected pursuant to this subchapter for purposes of inclusion in the National DNA Index System.

(Pub. L. 112–253, §4, Jan. 10, 2013, 126 Stat. 2408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 112–253, Jan. 10, 2013, 126 Stat. 2407, known as the Katie Sepich Enhanced DNA Collection Act of 2012, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2013 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14137b of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.