alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-07-031 May 11, 2007

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE AT HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Progress Energy officials

and the public on Wednesday, May 23, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last

year and other issues at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant, located southwest of Raleigh, N.C.

The meeting, which begins with an open house and poster session from 5:00 to 7:00 p.m., will

be at New Horizons Fellowship, 820 E. Williams Street (Highway 55), in Apex. During the open

house, NRC staff will be available to answer questions and provide information about the Harris plant. 

There will also be displays discussing various aspects of NRC regulations and activities.

At 7:15, the NRC staff will present an overview of the plant’s performance during 2006 and

allow Progress Energy officials to comment. After that presentation, the NRC staff will answer written

questions, and that question and answer session is scheduled to end at about 9:00 p.m. 

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Harris plant and other commercial

nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This meeting allows us

to discuss that performance with the company, local officials and people living near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2006q4.pdf.

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

depending on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

The NRC said the Harris plant operated safely during 2006 with all inspection findings being

“green,” or of very low safety significance, and all performance indicators also indicating performance

at levels requiring no additional NRC oversight. 

As a result, the NRC plans to conduct only routine baseline inspections at the plant for the rest

of 2006. The NRC staff will also conduct several non-routine inspections, including license renewal

and the containment emergency re-circulation sump temporary instruction.
Current information for the Harris plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html .

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 04/25/2007 FSME Procedure SA-800, Providing NRC Predecisional Documents to Agreement States, Organization of Agreement States, Inc., and Appropriate Working Groups of the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc.

Accession Number: ML080590677

Date Released: Thursday, March 6, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML080590676 - 04/25/2007 FSME Procedure, SA-800, Providing NRC Predecisional Documents to Agreement States, Organization of Agreement States, Inc., and Appropriate Working Groups of the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (9 page(s), 4/25/2007)
    - ML070260337 - SA-800: Providing NRC Predecisional Documents to Agreement States and Appropriate Working Groups of the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (10 page(s), 1/25/2007)
    - ML080640733 - FSME Procedure SA-800 - Summary of Comments. (3 page(s), 4/17/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
**Exhibit 13.2.**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Thilo Kusch,certify that the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: June 27, 2007 |   |   |   |                    |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   |   |   |                    |
|                |   | By:    |   | /s/ Thilo Kusch         |
|                |   | Name:  |   | Thilo Kusch             |
|                |   | Title: |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before January 28, 2019. Such persons may also file a written request for a hearing on the application on or before January 28, 2019.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for hearing must be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Administrator, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. All requests for hearing should also be sent to: (1) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: Hearing Clerk/OALJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and (2) Drug Enforcement Administration, Attn: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on August 13, 2018, Agilent Technologies, 250 Smith Street, North Kingstown, Rhode Island 02852 applied to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleMarihuana
7360
ITetrahydrocannabinols
7370
I
 
 
 This company plans to import the listed controlled substances in bulk form for testing and calibration only. The listed controlled substances are not for human or animal use. Dated: December 8, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-28080 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 1997 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN



 EXHIBIT 10.67 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO THE 
 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 
 1997 STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN, 
 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED ON JANUARY 24, 2000 

 
 The Boston Properties, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”), as amended and restated on January 24, 2000, is hereby amended, by action of the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Boston Properties, Inc. at a meeting of the Committee duly called and
held on October 16, 2003, as follows: 
  
 Section 14 is hereby
amended by adding the following sentences at the beginning of such Section 14: 
  
 “Unless sooner terminated as herein provided, the Plan shall terminate on May 3, 2010 and no Award shall be granted under the Plan on and after such date. The termination of the Plan shall not adversely affect
the rights under any outstanding Award without the holder’s written consent.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned certifies that the Amendment set forth above was adopted by the Committee on October 16, 2003. 
  
  
 /s/    FRANK D. BURT, ESQ. 
 Frank D.
Burt, Secretary
Exhibit 13.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I, Gabi Seligsohn, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
  1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: March 26, 2010
  /s/ Gabi Seligsohn

Gabi Seligsohn

President and Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 3

source, whichever is later. New sources are defined as 

sources that began construction on or after June 4, 2010, or 

commenced reconstruction or modification after [INSERT THE DATE 

6 MONTHS AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL 

REGISTER].

Costs and Benefits

The final rule affects 106 existing sources located at 76 

facilities. The EPA projects an additional incinerator and five 

additional small remote incinerators to be subject to this rule 

over the next 5 years. This final rule applies to facilities in 

multiple sectors of our economy including small entities. Table 

1 of this preamble summarizes the costs and benefits associated 

with this final rule. Note, these are the costs and benefits of 

the final 2011 CISWI rule as amended by today’s final rule and 

replace the costs and benefits presented in the March 2011 final 

rule. For comparison, the 2011 final rule, at a 7 percent 

discount rate, had costs of $218 million and monetized benefits 

of $320 to $790 million (2008 dollars). (However, because the 

February 2011 RIA did not incorporate the final engineering 

costs and emission reductions estimates, it reported costs of 

$280 million and monetized benefits of $310 to $750 million 

(2008 dollars)).[T1] A more detailed discussion of the costs and 
Page 2 of 3

benefits of this final rule is provided in section II.G of this 

preamble. 

Table 1. Summary of the Monetized Benefits, Social Costs and Net 

Benefits for the Final CISWI NSPS and EG In 2015 (Millions of 

2008$)1

3 percent Discount 

Rate

7 percent Discount 

Rate

Total Monetized 

Benefits2 $420 to $1,000 $380 to $930

Total Social 

Costs3 $258 $258

Net Benefits $160 to $770 $120 to $670

Non-monetized 

Benefits

Health effects from exposure to HAP 780 

tons of HCl, 2.5 tons of lead, 1.8 tons of 

Cd, 680 pounds of Hg, and 58 grams of 

dioxins/furans)

Health effects from exposure to criteria 

pollutants (20,000 tons of CO, 6,300 tons of 

SO2, 5,400 tons of NO2, and secondary 

formation of ozone) 

Ecosystem effects 

Visibility impairment 

1 All estimates are for the implementation year (2015) and are 

rounded to two significant figures. These results reflect the 

lowest cost disposal assumption.

2 The total monetized benefits reflect the human health benefits 

associated with reducing exposure to PM2.5 through reductions of 

PM2.5 precursors such as directly emitted particles, SO2, and 

NOx. It is important to note that the monetized benefits 

include many but not all health effects associated with PM2.5

exposure. Monetized benefits are shown as a range from Pope, et 

al. (2002) to Laden, et al. (2006). These models assume that 

all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, 

are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the 

scientific evidence is not yet sufficient to allow 

differentiation of effect estimates by particle type. 

3The methodology used to estimate social costs for 1 year in the 

multimarket model using surplus changes results in the same 

social costs for both discount rates.
Page 3 of 3
TS- ACET10/20/30/40/50

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites

Controlled by OthersAttachment #7

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at**

**Industrial Sites Controlled by Others** TS

- ACET10/20/30/40/50
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

      KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Tod R. Hamachek and Jennifer L. Good and each of
them, severally as attorney-in-fact for him or her in any and all capacities, to
sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, and to file same and any amendments, with
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be
done virtue hereof.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE                                                     DATE
---------                                                     ----

<S>                                                           <C> 
/s/ Paul E. Freiman                                           March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
Paul E. Freiman, Director


/s/ Jere E. Goyan, Ph.d.                                      March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
Jere E. Goyan, Ph.D., Director


/s/ Rolf H. Henel                                             March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
Rolf H. Henel, Director


/s/ Robert J. Hennessey                                       March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
Robert J. Hennessey, Director


/s/ N. Stewart Rogers                                         March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
N. Stewart Rogers, Director


/s/ John N. Staniforth, Ph.d.                                 March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
John N. Staniforth, Ph.D., Director


/s/ Anne M. Vanlent                                           March 20, 1999
----------------------------------------------------          --------------
Anne M. VanLent, Director
</TABLE>
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Dex Media East LLC as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman of the Board of Directors and
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Chief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2007
    
    
    
    May 14, 2007
  33
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1572 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1572

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox 
 Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Winston E. Arnow United States 
                             Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1572

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox 
 Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Winston E. Arnow United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox Street in 
Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Winston E. 
Arnow United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Winston E. 
Arnow United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 3, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64572-64573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies

[[Page 64573]]

owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed 
below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 11, 2019.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (David L. Hubbard, Senior 
Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62210d0f0f070c16114c0312120e0b0103160b0d0c112211160e114c0410004c0d1005"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7f4d8dadad2d9c3c499d6c7c7dbded4d6c3ded8d9c4f7c4c3dbc499d1c5d599d8c5d0">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. The McGehee Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan, McGehee, 
Arkansas; to acquire additional voting shares of Southeast Financial 
Bankstock Corp., McGehee, Arkansas, and thereby acquire shares of 
McGehee Bank, McGehee, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 12, 
2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-27249 Filed 12-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adherex Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), each of the undersigned, Rostislav Raykov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert Andrade, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |     |                                         
|------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------
|Date:  November 13, 2009 |     |                                         
|                         |     |                                         
|                         | By: | /s/ ROSTISLAV RAYKOV                    
|                         |     | Rostislav Raykov
Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  November 13, 2009 |     |                                         
|                         |     |                                         
|                         | By: | /s/ ROBERT ANDRADE                      
|                         |     | Robert Andrade
Chief Financial Officer
### §675. Conditions precedent for commencement of mining operations

No permission granted to a mine owner or owners under this chapter shall take effect, so far as regards the working of a mine, until all impounding dams or other restraining works, if any are prescribed by the order granting such permission, have been completed and until the impounding dams or other restraining works or settling reservoirs provided by said commission have reached such a stage as, in the opinion of said commission, it is safe to use the same: Provided, however, That if said commission shall be of the opinion that the restraining and other works already constructed at the mine or mines shall be sufficient to protect the navigable rivers of said systems and the work of said commission, then the owner or owners of such mine or mines may be permitted to commence operations.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §15, 27 Stat. 509.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

California Debris Commission abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Army by Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1106, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4229, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.