alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1846

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 

1991 to provide for the collection of data on the availability of credit 

for women-owned business. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 to provide for the collection of 

data on the availability of credit for women-owned business.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Availability for 

5 Women-Owned Businesses Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF DATA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (a) and (b) of section 

8 122 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Im-
2

•HR 1846 IH 

1 provement Act of 1991 (12 U.S.C. 1817 nt.) are each 

2 amended by inserting ‘‘, women-owned businesses,’’ after 

3 ‘‘small businesses’’. 

4 (b) WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESSES DEFINED.—Sec5 tion 122 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

6 Improvement Act of 1991 (12 U.S.C. 1817 nt.) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(d) WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS DEFINED.—The 

9 term ‘women-owned business’ means any business—

10 ‘‘(1) more than 50 percent of the outstanding 

11 shares of which are held by 1 or more women; and 

12 ‘‘(2) a majority of the directors on the board of 

13 directors of which are women.’’. 

14 (c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

15 Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 122(c) of the Federal 

16 Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 

17 (12 U.S.C. 1817 nt.) are each amended by inserting ‘‘and 

18 women-owned businesses’’ before the period at the end of 

19 each such paragraph.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors

MPW Industrial Services
Group:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-41991) pertaining to the MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. 1997, 1994 and 1991 Stock Option Plans of our report dated September 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of MPW Industrial Services Group,
Inc. as of June 30, 2005, and the related consolidated statement of operations, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended included in the Annual Report on the Form 10-K.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|                  
|Columbus, OH      
|September 30, 2005
### §50331. Congressional Badge of Bravery Office

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Department of Justice a Congressional Badge of Bravery Office.

#### (b) Duties

The Office shall—

(1) receive nominations from Federal agency heads on behalf of the Federal Board and deliver such nominations to the Federal Board at Federal Board meetings described in section 50313(d)(2) of this title;

(2) receive nominations from State or local agency heads on behalf of the State and Local Board and deliver such nominations to the State and Local Board at State and Local Board meetings described in section 50323(d)(2) of this title; and

(3) provide staff support to the Federal Board and the State and Local Board to carry out the duties described in section 50313(b) and section 50323(b) of this title, respectively.

(Pub. L. 110–298, title III, §301, July 31, 2008, 122 Stat. 2994.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 15261 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) KEIRON M. ELIAS , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23

- 0986 (UNA) ) SCOTT S. HARRIS, ) ) Defendant. )

___________________________________ )
MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s applications for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 2, 11) and her pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court will grant the applications and, for the reasons discussed below, dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff brings this action against the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court. Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 2 (page numbers designated by CM/ECF). She alleges she submitted a petition for writ of certiorari and appellate brief, which defendant rejected as untimely filed. See id. at 4

- 5. Plaintiff does not demand monetary damages; she “seeks injunctive relief ordering defendant

to file [her] opening Appellate Brief and evidence in support of claims in Appeal[.]” Id . at 3 ; see id . at 5

. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is the designated recipient of all documents submitted to the Supreme Court and is authorized to reject any filing that does not comply with applicable rules and orders. See Sup. Ct. R. 1. This Court has no authority to determine what action, if any, must be taken by the Supreme Court and its administrative officers. See Nixon v. Barnes , 799 F. App ’ x 5 (D.C. Cir. 20 20) (“ Insofar as appellant sought declaratory relief against an employee of the Supreme Court Clerk’s office, the district court lacked authority to grant such relief .”); Miller2 v. Harris , 599 F. App ’ x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (“The district court correctly dete rmined it lacked jurisdiction to review decisions of the United States Supreme Court, including those of its Clerk of Court.”); In re Marin , 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam) (concluding that the Supreme Court “ has inherent supervisory authority o ver its Clerk ,” and “ neither a district court nor a circuit court of appeals has jurisdiction to interfere with it by mandamus or otherwise ”) ; Bishay v. Harris , No. 21

- cv - 1831, 2022 WL 612609, at *2 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2022) (concluding district court has no authority “to declare the clerks’ routine processing of a stay application to be fraudu lent, criminal, and in violation of the Constitution ” because granting such relief “ would directly trench on the Supreme Court ’ s exclusive supervisory authority ”), aff ’ d , No. 22

- 5060, 2022 WL 3449223 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 11, 2022)

. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: July 17, 2023 TREVOR N. McFADDEN United States District Judge
§ 581.307 Compliance with legal process requiring the payment of attorney fees, interest, and/or court costs. Before complying with legal process that requires withholding for the payment of attorney fees, interest, and/or court costs, the governmental entity must determine that the legal process meets both of the following requirements: ( a ) The legal process must expressly provide for inclusion of attorney fees, interest, and/or court costs as (rather than in addition to) child support and/or alimony payments;
( b ) The awarding of attorney fees, interest, and/or court costs as child support and/or alimony must be within the authority of the court, authorized official, or authorized State agency that issued the legal process. It will be deemed to be within the authority of the court, authorized official, or authorized State agency to award attorney fees as child support and/or alimony if such order is not in violation of or inconsistent with State or local law, even if State or local law does not expressly provide for such an award.
[55 FR 1357, Jan. 16, 1990]
§ 831.117 Computation of the supplemental liability. ( a ) OPM will compute each supplemental liability of the Fund using demographic factors specific to the populations for which the supplemental liability applies.
( b ) The supplemental liability will be computed based on the economic assumptions used by the Board of Actuaries of the Civil Service Retirement System for the most recent valuation of the System.
( c ) Each supplemental liability shall be rounded to the nearest one hundred million dollars.
[82 FR 49279, Oct. 25, 2017]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0185 - Moderator Exclusion in Transportation Packages

Accession Number: ML072190681

Date Released: Thursday, January 10, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML063240443 - SECY-07-0185 - Moderator Exclusion in Transportation Packages (7 page(s), 10/22/2007)
    - ML072190682 - SECY-07-0185 - Enclosure 1:  Regulatory References (2 page(s), 10/22/2007)
    - ML072190683 - SECY-07-0185 - Enclosure 2:  Regulatory Options for Considering Moderator Exclusion (4 page(s), 10/22/2007)
    - ML081970150 - SECY-07-0185 - REDACTED Enclosure 3 - Security-Related Issues Connected with Moderator Exclusion (3 page(s), 10/22/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 427

EX PA R TE M A R V I N W A D D LE TO N , I I I , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 4 1 - 0 0 8 5 - 0 6 I N T HE 1 1 4 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM S M I TH CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 1 8 S. W. 2 d

8 2 4 , 8 2 6 ( T e x. Cr im
. Ap p . 1 9 6 7 )
. Ap p li c an t w a s c o n v ic te d o f a g g rava ted assault of a public serva

ntand sente nced to life imprisonment. His direct appe al was dismissed by the Twe lfth Court for wa nt of jurisdiction. W

ad dle ton v. State , N o . 1 2
- 0 6
- 0 0 1 2 1
- CR ( T e x. App.–Tyler, Jun. 7, 2006, no pet.) (unpublished). Applicant conte nds, inte r a lia , that his counsel re ndere d ineffe ctive assistanc e beca use the notice of appea l did not include the cer tification of applica

nt’s rig ht of appe al, which r esulted in the2

appea l being dismiss ed for want of jurisdiction. Th e tr ia l c ourt ha s de te rm ine d th a t a pp lic ant w a s d e nie d h is r ig ht t o a pp e a l du e to n o f

a ult of his ow n a

nd he sh ou ld b e g ra

nte d a n o ut- of -t ime a pp e a l. We fi nd , th erefo re, th a t App lic ant i s entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the j udg ment of convic tion in C ause N o. 241-0085-06 from the 114 J udicial District Court of Smit hCounty . Applicant is order ed re turned th to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal so th at h e m ay t h en, with t he aid of counsel, obtain a

meaning ful appe al. All time limi ts shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. W e hold that, should Applicant desire to pr osecute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the tr ia l c ourt wi thi n 3 0 d ay s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: September

29, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.206 Expiration of reemployment rights.

Reemployment rights granted under a Letter of Authority expire at the end of 2 years following the date of the personnel action, unless exercised or otherwise terminated before that time, except that the reemployment rights of an employee serving outside the continental United States extend for an additional period of 3 months.
| **Exhibit    32.1** |
|---------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **
| In    connection with the Quarterly Report of Median Group Inc a Texas corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the    six months period ending June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),    Andrew Hwan Lee, I, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (1) | The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations    of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| A signed    original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Median Group Inc, and will be retained by    Median Group Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| */s/    Andrew Hwan Lee*                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| --------------------------                                 |
| Andrew Hwan Lee                                            |
| Chief Executive    Officer                                 |
|  

August                                    17, 2017 |
### §1474. Federal intervention actions

Upon a determination under section 1472 of this title of a grave and imminent danger to the coastline or related interests of the United States, the Secretary may—

(1) coordinate and direct all public and private efforts directed at the removal or elimination of the threatened pollution damage;

(2) directly or indirectly undertake the whole or any part of any salvage or other action he could require or direct under subsection (1) of this section; and

(3) remove, and, if necessary, destroy the ship and cargo which is the source of the danger.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §5, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 9.)
### §60104. Enforcement

Any person who is found in violation of the regulations established by sections 60101 to 60104 of this title shall—

(1) be liable to the United States for a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for each violation and, in addition, to the United States for the costs of prosecution; and

(2) make restitution to any entity of the United States, of a State, or of an inferior political subdivision of a State, which expends funds for the purpose of apprehending any violent prisoner who escapes from a prisoner transport company as the result, in whole or in part, of a violation of regulations promulgated pursuant to section 60103(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–560, §5, Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2786.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13726c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 3101.102 Designation of separate agency components. Pursuant to 5 CFR 2635.203(a), each of the following components of the Department of the Treasury is designated as a separate agency for purposes of the regulations contained in subpart B of 5 CFR part 2635 governing gifts from outside sources and 5 CFR 2635.807 governing teaching, speaking or writing: ( a ) Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB);
( b ) Bureau of Engraving and Printing;
( c ) Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS);
( d ) Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN);
( e ) Internal Revenue Service (IRS);
( f ) Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC);
( g ) Office of the Inspector General;
( h ) Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP);
( i ) Office of the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA); and
( j ) United States Mint.
Note to § 3101.102 :
As a result of the designations contained in this section, employees of the remaining parts of the Department of the Treasury (e.g., employees in Departmental Offices) will also be treated as employees of an agency that is separate from all of the above listed bureaus and offices for purposes of determining whether the donor of a gift is a prohibited source under 5 CFR 2635.203(d) and for identifying an employee's “agency” under 5 CFR 2635.807 governing teaching, speaking and writing. For purposes of this section, employees in the Legal Division shall be considered to be part of the bureaus or offices in which they serve.
[79 FR 65877, Nov. 6, 2014]
### §10511. Grant authorization

The Attorney General may make funds available under this subchapter to States and units of local government, or combinations thereof, to carry out all or a substantial part of a program or project intended to develop or improve the capability to analyze deoxyribonucleic acid (referred to in this subchapter as "DNA") in a forensic laboratory.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2401, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXI, §210302(c)(1)(C), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2066.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796kk of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2401 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2601 and is classified to section 10541 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 103–322, title XXI, §210302(c)(4), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2068, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [enacting this subchapter and amending sections 10152, 10154, 10261, and 10541 of this title] shall take effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Sept. 13, 1994]."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Cheryl
Spousta-Schertzer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

BY:  /S/ CHERYL SPOUSTA-SCHERTZER
     ----------------------------
     CHERYL SPOUSTA-SCHERTZER
     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     NOVEMBER 19, 2007
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0034 - Litigation Report 2004 - 01

Accession Number: ML040560453

Date Released: Tuesday, March 16, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML040560462 - SECY-04-0034 - Litigation Report - 2004-01 (21 page(s), 3/2/2004)
    - ML040560213 - Khoury v. NRC dated 02/23/04. (3 page(s), 11/12/2003)
    - ML040560158 - Summons & Notice of Status Conference in an Adversary Proceeding, 1/20/04. (7 page(s), 1/23/2004)
    - ML040630507 - SECY-04-0034 - Attachment 1 - Connecticut Coalition, "Petition for Review," dated 1/6/04 (3 page(s), 1/6/2004)
    - ML040560188 - Petition for Review, dated 01/08/04. (3 page(s), 1/8/2003)
    - ML040560176 - Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue, dated 1/26/04. (3 page(s), 1/26/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 551.209 Creative professionals. ( a ) To qualify for the creative professional exemption, an employee's primary duty must be the performance of work requiring invention, imagination, originality, or talent in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor as opposed to routine mental, manual, mechanical, or physical work. The work performed must be “in a recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor,” including such fields as music, writing, acting, and the graphic arts. The exemption does not apply to work which can be produced by a person with general manual or intellectual ability and training. The requirement of “invention, imagination, originality, or talent” distinguishes the creative professions from work that primarily depends on intelligence, diligence, and accuracy. The duties of employees vary widely, and exemption as a creative professional depends on the extent of the invention, imagination, originality, or talent exercised by the employee. Determination of exempt creative professional status must be made on a case-by-case basis. This requirement generally is met by actors, musicians, composers, conductors, and soloists; painters who at most are given the subject matter of their painting; and writers who choose their own subjects and hand in a finished piece of work to their employers. This requirement generally is not met by a person who is employed as a retoucher of photographs, since such work is not properly described as creative in character.
( b ) Federal employees engaged in the work of newspapers, magazines, television, or other media are not exempt creative professionals if they only collect, organize, and record information that is routine or already public, or if they do not contribute a unique interpretation or analysis to a news product. For example, employees who merely rewrite press releases or who write standard recounts of public information by gathering facts on routine community events are not exempt creative professionals. Employees also do not qualify as exempt creative professionals if their work product is subject to substantial control by the organization. However, when the work requires invention, imagination, originality, or talent, as opposed to work which depends primarily on intelligence, diligence, and accuracy, such employees may qualify as exempt creative professionals if their primary duty is performing on the air in radio, television or other electronic media; conducting investigative interviews; analyzing or interpreting public events; writing editorials, opinion columns, or other commentary; or acting as a narrator or commentator. Work that does not fully meet the creative professional exemption criteria does not preclude exemption under another exemption category. For example, public affairs work under control of the organization that does not meet the creative professional exemption may meet the administrative exemption.