alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 630.906 Transfer of annual leave. ( a ) An employee may submit a voluntary written request to his or her own employing agency that a specified number of hours of his or her accrued annual leave be transferred from his or her annual leave account to the annual leave account of a specified leave recipient. Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, annual leave may be transferred only to a leave recipient employed by the leave donor's employing agency.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section and subject to the limitations on the amount of annual leave that may be donated by a leave donor under § 630.908, all or any portion of the annual leave requested under paragraph (a) of this section may be transferred to the annual leave account of the specified leave recipient under procedures established by the leave recipient's employing agency.
( c ) An agency having employees who earn and use annual leave on the basis of an uncommon tour of duty shall establish procedures for administering the transfer of annual leave to or from such employees under this subpart.
( d ) A leave recipient's employing agency shall not transfer annual leave to a leave donor's immediate supervisor.
( e ) Annual leave transferred under this section may be substituted retroactively for period of leave without pay (LWOP) or used to liquidate an indebtedness for advanced annual or sick leave granted on or after a date fixed by the leave recipient's employing agency as the beginning of the period of medical emergency for which LWOP or advanced annual or sick leave was granted.
( f ) A leave recipient's employing agency shall accept the transfer of annual leave from leave donors employed by one or more other agencies when— ( 1 ) A family member of a leave recipient is employed by another agency and requests the transfer of annual leave to the leave recipient;
( 2 ) In the judgment of the leave recipient's employing agency, the amount of annual leave transferred from leave donors employed by the leave recipient's employing agency may not be sufficient to meet the needs of the leave recipient; or
( 3 ) In the judgment of the leave recipient's employing agency, acceptance of leave transferred from another agency would further the purpose of the voluntary leave transfer program.
( g ) The employing agency of a leave donor who wishes to donate annual leave to a leave recipient in another agency shall verify the availability of annual leave in the leave donor's annual leave account, determine that the amount of annual leave to be donated does not exceed the limitations in § 630.908, and ascertain that the leave recipient's employing agency has made any determination that may be required under paragraph (f) of this section. Upon satisfying these requirements, the leave donor's employing agency shall— ( 1 ) Reduce the amount of annual leave credited to the leave donor's annual leave account, as appropriate; and
( 2 ) Notify the leave recipient's employing agency in writing of the amount of annual leave to be credited to the leave recipient's annual leave account.
#### § 595.101 Purpose.

Section 5948 of title 5, United States Code, authorizes the payment of allowances to certain eligible Federal physicians who enter into service agreements with their agencies. These allowances are paid only to categories of physicians for which the agency is experiencing recruitment and retention problems and are fixed at the minimum amounts necessary to deal with such problems. The President has delegated regulatory responsibility for this program to the Director of OPM, acting in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget. This part contains the regulations, criteria and conditions which the Director of OPM, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, has prescribed for the administration of the physicians' comparability allowance program. This part supplements and implements 5 U.S.C. 5948 and should be read together with that section of law.

[69 FR 27817, May 17, 2004]
FLRA NEWS
                                
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY  *  WASNINGTON, DC  *  20424


Contact: Helenann Hirsch                 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
      202-482-6500                     March 8, 1995 -- PR 95-1

              OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL REPORTS 
                   RESULTS OF OUTREACH SURVEY 
                 TO NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL

     In a presentation to the National Partnership Council
today, Joseph Swerdzewski, General Counsel of the Federal Labor
Relations Authority, discussed the findings of a recent Outreach
Survey assessing the effectiveness of the facilitation,
intervention, training and education programs presented by the
Office of General Counsel during the past year.  

     Results of the survey, which were sent to a representative
sampling of the over 17,000 management and union representatives
who participated in the programs, show that the programs are
helping parties improve their relationships and reduce the cost
of conflict in the federal service.  Program participants say
they are relying less on the adversarial methods of dispute
resolution and more on informal cooperative problem solving,
giving them more time to accomplish the mission of the agency
and serve the American public.  Survey highlights include a
reduction in the number of unfair labor practices and formal
grievances in agencies participating in the programs.

      "President Clinton's and the National Partnership
Council's commitment to cooperative labor-management
relationships has helped create an environment where agencies
and unions are receptive to our facilitation, intervention,
training and education programs" said FLRA General Counsel
Swerdzewski.  "I am gratified that we are beginning to see the
fruits of our efforts." Adding that the survey respondents also
gave some helpful suggestions on improving the programs,
Swerdzewski confirmed the FLRA's commitment to "maintaining a
dialogue with agencies and unions to build on the success of our
efforts and promote stable labor-management relationships in the
federal sector."

     The Federal Labor Relations Authority administers the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and provides
guidance and leadership to agencies and unions in the federal
government.  The National Partnership Council, established by
President Clinton in October, 1993, is composed of
representatives from unions and agencies, including the Federal
Labor Relations Authority.  The Council is charged with, among
other responsibilities, supporting the creation of 
labor-management partnerships and promoting partnership efforts.

     A copy of the Executive Summary of the Survey is attached.



                             --end--
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-056 April 18, 2006

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM EXTENDED

OPERATION OF BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statement on the

proposed renewal of the operating licenses for the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. The

report contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would preclude license

renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The Brunswick plant is located on the Cape Fear River, approximately 15 miles south of

Wilmington, N.C. The current operating licenses expire Sept. 8, 2016, for Unit 1 and Dec. 27, 2014,

for Unit 2. Carolina Power and Light, now doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.,

submitted an application for renewal of the licenses Oct. 18, 2004.

As part of its environmental review of the applications, the NRC held public meetings near the

plant to discuss the scope of the review and the draft version of the environmental impact statement.

Comments were received from members of the public, local officials, and representatives of state and

federal agencies.

The Brunswick Final Environmental Impact Statement is available on the NRC’s Web site at

this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement25/index.html . Copies are also available for inspection at

the NRC’s Public Document Room at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md,

and the William Madison Randall Library, located at 601 S. College Rd., Wilmington, NC, 28403. 

###
# L_2017270EN.01002001.xml

| 19.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 270/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 270/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 52/2016

of 18 March 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1882]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1095 of 5 May 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for professional refrigerated storage cabinets, blast cabinets, condensing units and process chillers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1095 of 5 May 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for professional refrigerated storage cabinets, blast cabinets, condensing units and process chillers (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 6n (Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1189) of Chapter IV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘6o. | 32015 R 1095: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1095 of 5 May 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for professional refrigerated storage cabinets, blast cabinets, condensing units and process chillers (OJ L 177, 8.7.2015, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6o.

Article 2

The following point is inserted after point 26o (Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1189) of Annex IV to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘26p. | 32015 R 1095: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1095 of 5 May 2015 implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for professional refrigerated storage cabinets, blast cabinets, condensing units and process chillers (OJ L 177, 8.7.2015, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘26p.

Article 3

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/1095 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 19 March 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 18 March 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 177, 8.7.2015, p. 19.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant tothe requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker,Chief Financial Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”),hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’s quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, to which this certificationis attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 

                **In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has sether hand hereto as of the 5th day of November, 2004.

 

 
| /s/Nancy J.  Baker                       |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Nancy J.  Baker, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 7, 2010

d0107 

# Order

January 7, 2010

140294 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140294 COA: 294667 Wayne CC: 09-015867-AR MARY M. WATERSTONE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the Decemb er 17, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall consider whether th e Attorney General’s prosecution of the defendant is consistent with the requirement s of Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 1.7, 1.9, and 1.10, and with Attorney General v Public Service Commission , 243 Mich App 487 (2000). We further DIRECT the Cour t of Appeals to issue an opinion within 56 days of the date of this or der. We leave it to the disc retion of the Court of Appeals whether to order oral argument or further brie fing. We further ORDER that district court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be revi ewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

C AVANAGH , J., would deny leave to appeal.

C ORRIGAN

, J., states as follows:

I am not participating because I may be a witness in this case.
§ 550.906 Termination of hazard pay differential. An agency shall discontinue payment of hazard pay differential to an employee when— ( a ) One or more of the conditions requisite for such payment ceases to exist;
( b ) Safety precautions have reduced the element of hazard to a less than significant level of risk, consistent with generally accepted standards that may be applicable, such as those published by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of Labor; or
( c ) Protective or mechanical devices have adequately alleviated physical discomfort or distress.
[56 FR 20345, May 3, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 33417, June 29, 1994]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Institute of Electrical 
and Electronics Engineers (``IEEE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization, and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Institute of 
Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ. The nature and 
scope of IEEE's standards development activities are: To develop 
consensus standards through an open process that brings diverse parts 
of the electrical engineering industry together. Through its portfolio 
of more than 870 completed standards and over 400 in development, IEEE 
promotes the electrical engineering process by creating, developing, 
integrating, sharing and applying knowledge about electro- and 
information technologies and sciences.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24561 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 410.405 Protection of Government interest.

The head of an agency shall establish such procedures as he or she considers necessary to protect the Government's interest when employees fail to complete, or to successfully complete, training for which the agency pays the expenses.
### §426–2. Board on Coastal Engineering Research

The functions of the Coastal Engineering Research Center established by section 426–1 of this title, shall be conducted with the guidance and advice of a Board on Coastal Engineering Research, constituted by the Chief of Engineers in the same manner as the present Beach Erosion Board.

(Pub. L. 88–172, §2, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 305.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Compensation of Board

Pub. L. 91–611, title I, §105, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1819, provided that: "The civilian members of the Board on Coastal Engineering Research authorized by the Act of November 7, 1963 (33 U.S.C. 426–2) may be paid at rates not to exceed the daily equivalent of the rate for GS–18 for each day of attendance at Board meetings, not to exceed thirty days per year, in addition to the traveling and other necessary expenses connected with their duties on the Board in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5703(b), (d), and 5707."

[References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.]

#### Abolition of Beach Erosion Board

Section 1 of Pub. L. 88–172 abolished Beach Erosion Board, and is set out as a note under section 426 of this title. For transfer of functions of Board to Coastal Engineering Research Center and Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, see sections 426–1 and 426–3 of this title. For termination of Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 180 days after Oct. 31, 1992, and reassignment of duties and responsibilities by Secretary of Army, see section 223 of Pub. L. 102–580, set out as a note under section 541 of this title.
§ 294.104 Clarifying a requester's category. ( a ) *Seeking clarification of a requester's category.* OPM may seek additional clarification before assigning a person to a specific category if— ( 1 ) There is reasonable cause to doubt the requester's intended use of records; or
( 2 ) The intended use is not clear from the request itself; or
( 3 ) There is any other reasonable doubt about qualifications that may affect the fees applicable or the services rendered under § 294.109.
( b ) *Prompt notification to requester.* When OPM seeks clarification as provided by paragraph (a) of this section, it will provide prompt notification either by telephone or in writing of the information or materials needed.
( c ) *Effect of seeking clarification on time limits for responding.* When applying the time limits in section 552 of title 5, United States Code, OPM will not officially consider any request for records as being received until the official who is assigned responsibility for making a decision on releasing the records has received any additional clarification sought under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section; and has determined that the clarifying information is sufficient to correctly place the requester in one of the categories prescribed in this section. If the requested clarifying information is not received within a reasonable time, OPM will, based on the information available, determine a final category for the request and calculate applicable fees.
[54 FR 25094, June 13, 1989, as amended at 58 FR 32043, June 8, 1993]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    March 1, 2007
    
    /s/ Sung Won Sohn, Ph.D.Sung Won Sohn, Ph.D.President and Chief Executive Officer
### §649. Vicksburg Harbor and Ohio River below Cache River

The harbor at Vicksburg, Mississippi, and the Ohio River from its mouth to the mouth of the Cache River, are transferred to and placed under the control and jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission: Provided, That no part of the improvement of the Ohio River, with a view to the construction of locks and dams, shall be considered as transferred to or placed under the control and jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission.

(July 27, 1916, ch. 260, §1, 39 Stat. 402.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from part of section 1 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1916.
EXHIBIT32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, David Polay, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

/s/David Polay                                   
DavidPolay

ChiefFinancial Officer

April14, 2004
### §12145. Reports

Not later than December 31, 1998, the Attorney General shall prepare and submit to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House and Senate an evaluation of the model programs developed under this part and make recommendations regarding the implementation of a national crime prevention program.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §30305, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13775 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.