alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §50501. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Coordinator

The term "Coordinator" means the Blue Alert Coordinator of the Department of Justice designated under section 50503(a) of this title.

#### (2) Blue Alert

The term "Blue Alert" means information sent through the network relating to—

(A) the serious injury or death of a law enforcement officer in the line of duty;

(B) an officer who is missing in connection with the officer's official duties; or

(C) an imminent and credible threat that an individual intends to cause the serious injury or death of a law enforcement officer.

#### (3) Blue Alert plan

The term "Blue Alert plan" means the plan of a State, unit of local government, or Federal agency participating in the network for the dissemination of information received as a Blue Alert.

#### (4) Law enforcement officer

The term "law enforcement officer" shall have the same meaning as in section 10284 of this title.

#### (5) Network

The term "network" means the Blue Alert communications network established by the Attorney General under section 50502 of this title.

#### (6) State

The term "State" means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 114–12, §2, May 19, 2015, 129 Stat. 192.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14165 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of Pub. L. 114–12, which is classified to this chapter, as the "Rafael Ramos and Wenjian Liu National Blue Alert Act of 2015", see section 1 of Pub. L. 114–12, set out as a Short Title of 2015 Act note under section 10101 of this title.
Februar y 13 , 201 2 , -wi^^Oj ^ fATiOi'. ' ^^: i OPERATIO N Kath y Borzenski 210 6 Northwes t

i ^ Lansing , M I 4890 6 210 6 Northwes t Ave . i n L C 2 i P j : 5 S Docke t Managemen t

Facilit y U.S . Dept . o f

Transportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Wes t Buildin g Gran dFloor , Roo mW-12014 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 T o Who mIt

Ma y Concern : I amwritin g thi s lette r

t o reques t

tha t yo u allo w Su n Country Airline s t o kee p thei r landin g right s at

Reaga n Nationa l Airport . A s Lansin g i s th e capita l city o f Michigan , i t i s importan t

tha t w e hav e adirec t

flight t o Washington , DC , tha t i s easil y accessibl e t o ou r nation' s Capital . I n th e past , whe n Su n Country was not availabl e t o us , i t

wa s a hardshi p t o thos e wh o neede dt o trave l betwee n th e tw o cities . I t woul db e asham e t o retur n t o thos e days . SimCountry Airline s ha s bee n adependabl e flight tha t w e can coun t

o n departin g an d arrivin g a t

th e projecte dtimes . W e hav e ha dan dstil l hav e othe r airline s tha t

ar e committe dt o flying fromLansin g t o DC , bu t the y als o sto p a t

large r airport s befor e makin g i t t o Washington , DC . On e flight goe s fromLansin g t o Detroi t t o D C an dth e othe r goe s fromLansin g t o Chicago t o DC . Th e proble mwith tha t i s tha t th e flights ar e notoriousl y delaye do r

cancelled , especiall y at

th e beginnin g o f

th e wee k an dthi s ha s cause dissue s for

passenger s tha t

nee dt o b e a t

thei r destinatio n b y aparticular tim e for thei r work . Thos e flights alway s tak e a n extr aamoun t o f tim e an denerg y tha t

coul db e utilize dmuc h mor e efficientl y whe n usin g Su n Coimtry' s direc t route . Both o f th e othe r tw o availabl e airline s ar e mor e expensiv e tha n Su n Country , whic h i s anothe r proble mwhe n tryin g t o trave l economically , whethe r for busines s o r

pleasure . M y so n live s i n Washington , D C an dfor hi man dou r

family , i t i s mor e feasibl e t o visi t eac h othe r

wit h Su n Country fare s an dschedules . W e hav e bee n thrille dvdt h ou r experience s o n Su n Countr y Airline s an dar e pleadin g wit h yo u t o le t

thi s airline s continu e usin g landin g right s a t Reaga n Airport . Thi s airlin e offer s Lansing-D C traveler s aconvenient , reliable , an dfiscally responsibl e choic e for thei r travels . A s wor dcontinue s t o spread , 1 ampositiv e mor e peopl e wil l b e delighte dt o trave l "Su n Country " an denjo y thei r stress-fre e D C adventure ! With gratitud e for

you r carefu l consideration , Kathy^orzenfeki ^
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64102-64103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Air Conditioning Contractors of America 
Educational Institute, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Air Conditioning 
Contractors of America Educational Institute, Inc. (``ACCA-EI'') has 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal 
place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the 
nature and scope of its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Air 
Conditioning Contractors of America Educational Institute, Inc., 
Arlington, VA. The nature and scope of ACCA-EI's standards development 
activities are: The development of standards that promote proper 
design, correct equipment selection and installation, energy efficient 
operation, proper maintenance and repair of heating, ventilating, air 
and system balance for optimal performance or operation of the HVACR 
systems. The goals of standards may include requirements for comfort 
and well being, design, equipment installation, and maintenance and 
repair and may include standards that promote optimum comfort, safe and 
efficient operation at minimal energy utilization, performance or 
operation or qualification of personnel.
    Additional information concerning ACCA-EI can be obtained from 
Hilary P.

[[Page 64103]]

Atkins, Executive Director of ACCA-EI, at (703) 824-8855.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24565 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 2100.1 Purpose.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended, the following rules of procedures are established with respect to access and amendment of records maintained on the individual subjects of these records by the Armed Forces Retirement Home, which includes the continuing care retirement communities of the U.S. Soldiers' and Airmen's Home and the U.S. Naval Home. These rules do not apply to civilian employees' records maintained by the individual facilities which are covered by the Office of Personnel Management systems of records.
Motion Granted, Abatement Order issued August 2, 2012 Withdrawn, and Order

filed August 14, 2012.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00205

- CR

____________ DUC HUU DOAN , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal fr om the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1232619



### ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Casey Garrett . On July 2, 2012 , time to file appellant’s brief expired without a brief and no motion for extension of time
was filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). Counsel and the trial court were notified on July 10, 2012 , th at no brief had been received. Appellant filed no response , and on August 2, 2012, this court ordered the appeal abated and directed the trial court to c onduct a hearing pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) to determine why appellant’s brief had not been filed.2

On August 8, 2012, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file a brief. Appellant’s counsel cited difficulty in obtaining a copy of the r ecord necessary to prepare appellant’s brief. According to the motion, counsel waited for the record to be returned to the Harris County District Clerk’s office by the attorney handling a related appeal filed
under our case number 14

- 12

- 00050

- CR. We note that the appeal in the related case was dismissed on March 8, 2012. Nonetheless, we GRANT appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief until September 7, 2012. No further extensions will be granted absent exceptional circumstances. Th e court also advises appellant’s counsel that this court maintains electronic copies of the appellate record, and counsel may obtain a disc containing the electronic record from the office of the Clerk of this court for use in preparing appellant’s brief.
Our August 2, 2012, order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed in
WITHDRAWN. The appeal is REINSTATED.

PER CURIAM
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1308

MOHAMED MOCTAR HIMA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MARCIE GUNNEL, Supervisor , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Lydia Kay Griggsby , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 01251

- LKG )

Submitted : July 20, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Mohamed Moctar Hima, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Joseph Kresslein, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1308 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Mohamed Moctar Hima appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant Marci Gunnel’s motion to dismiss Hima’s claims , brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 , and denying Hima’ s motion to amend his previously amended complaint

. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Hima v. Gunnel , No. 1:21

- cv 01251

- LKG (D. Md

. Mar. 16, 2023 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1308 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/25/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
NRC PUBLISHES STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 

OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE REGULATORY PROGRAM 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has published the staff’s strategic 

assessment of the agency’s low-level radioactive waste (LLW) regulatory program, 

proposing several initiatives to meet impending challenges such as decreased disposal 

capacity and increased production of LLW as new reactors and other nuclear facilities 

come online. 

 Those challenges include the anticipated closure to most of the nation in 2008 of 

the Barnwell, S.C., LLW disposal facility. Barnwell is currently the nation’s only 

commercial disposal option for certain wastes, and its closure could force licensees to 

store waste on-site until other disposal options become available. In addition, operation of 

new uranium enrichment facilities, potential nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities and 

commercial nuclear power plants will create additional demand for LLW disposal 

capacity. 

 The strategic assessment concludes that current NRC regulations on disposal of 

low-level radioactive waste fully protect the health and safety of workers and the public. 

However, the assessment identifies several measures that could improve the effectiveness 

of low-level waste management and regulation as disposal needs and circumstances 

change. 

 The strategic assessment identifies seven “high-priority” tasks the NRC intends to 

carry out to strengthen the agency’s ability to ensure safe and secure LLW disposal, 

improve the effectiveness of its regulations, and assure regulatory stability and 

predictability while allowing flexibility in disposal options. These tasks include updating 

guidance for extended storage of LLW; developing new guidance for alternative disposal 

of low-activity waste; and developing guidance for classifying LLW according to the risk 

it poses to public health and safety. 

 The strategic assessment was developed with input from the NRC’s Advisory 

Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials as well as external stakeholders such as 

industry, state agencies, and public interest groups. It is currently before the Commission 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-146 November 2, 2007
as an information paper (SECY-07-0180) and will be available on the NRC’s Web site at 

this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/2007/ , or 

by calling the NRC Office of Public Affairs at (301) 415-8200.

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site.
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Teryl Resources Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Robertson, CEO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: December 1, 2010 /s/   John G. Robertson John G. Robertson, CEO and Director
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

CIMARRON VALLEY RAILROAD L.C.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the status of Cimarron

Valley Railroad L. C. (CVR) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§231 et seq.) (RRA) and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seq.)

(RUIA). CVR has not previously been determined to be an employer under the RRA and the

Information about CVR was furnished by Mr. Alan Sessions, Controller of CVR. CVR operates

over 254 miles of track with interchange points at Boise City, Oklahoma, Springfield, Colorado

and E. Ensign, Kansas. According to information provided by Mr. Sessions, CVR began

operations on February 24, 1996, and its five employees were first compensated on that date. 

Mr. Sessions stated that the CVR interchanges with the BNSF. The Surface Transportation

Board has approved the transaction which made CVR a carrier by railroad.

Section 1(a)(1) of the RRA defines the term "employer" to include:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation

Board under part A of subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code;.

(ii) any company which is directly or indirectly owned or controlled by, or under

common control with one or more employers as defined in paragraph (i) of this

subdivision, and which operates any equipment or facility or performs any service

(except trucking service, casual service, and the casual operation of equipment or

facilities) in connection with the transportation of passengers or property by

railroad, or the receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refrigeration or

icing, storage, or handling of property transported by railroad * * *. [45 U.S.C.

§231(a)(l)(i) and (ii)].

Section 1(a) of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. § 351(a)) contains essentially the same definition.

The evidence establishes that CVR is a carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the

Surface Transportation Board. CVR is a class III carrier. Accordingly, it is determined that

the Cimarron Valley Railroad L.C. became a rail carrier employer under the Railroad

Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective February 24, 1996, the date

on which it first compensated employees.

RUIA.

' Ulen L. Bower

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1996-50

BA # 2777
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

MIKHAIL KOKORICH, §

§

Plaintiff Below, Appellant, § No. 207, 2023

§

v. § Court Below: Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

MOMENTUS, INC., a Delaware §

Corporation, § C.A. 2022-0722

§

Defendant Below, Appellee. §

Submitted: November 15, 2023

Decided: November 30, 2023

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, and GRIFFITHS, Justices. 

O R D E R

Now this 30th day of November 2023, the Court having considered this matter on 

the briefs and oral arguments of the parties and the record below and having concluded that 

the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of 

Chancery in its Memorandum Opinion and Order decided on May 15, 2023; 

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery be and the same hereby is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
### §20986. Children's safety online awareness campaigns

#### (a) Awareness campaign for children's safety online

#### (1) In general

The Attorney General, in consultation with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, is authorized to develop and carry out a public awareness campaign to demonstrate, explain, and encourage children, parents, and community leaders to better protect children when such children are on the Internet.

#### (2) Required components

The public awareness campaign described under paragraph (1) shall include components that compliment 1 and reinforce the campaign message in a variety of media, including the Internet, television, radio, and billboards.

#### (b) Awareness campaign regarding the accessibility and utilization of sex offender registries

The Attorney General, in consultation with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, is authorized to develop and carry out a public awareness campaign to demonstrate, explain, and encourage parents and community leaders to better access and utilize the Federal and State sex offender registries.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as are necessary for fiscal years 2007 through 2011.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title VI, §629, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 640.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16986 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 So in original. Probably should be "complement".
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2022

NO. 03-22-00243-CV

Author Manning II, Appellant

v.

Merrill Lynch, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

Having reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. 

Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
§ 733.104 Prohibited political activities—employees who reside in designated localities. ( a ) This section does not apply to an individual who is employed in an agency or position described in § 733.105(a), unless that individual has been appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
( b ) Employees who reside in a municipality or political subdivision designated by OPM under § 733.107 may not: ( 1 ) Run as the representative of a political party for local partisan political office;
( 2 ) Solicit a political contribution on behalf of an individual who is a candidate for local partisan political office and who represents a political party;
( 3 ) Knowingly solicit a political contribution from any Federal employee, except as permitted under 5 U.S.C. 7323(a)(2)(A)-(C).
( 4 ) Accept or receive a political contribution from a subordinate; or
( 5 ) Solicit, accept, or receive uncompensated volunteer services from a subordinate for any political purpose.
( c ) An employee covered under this section may not participate in political activities: ( 1 ) While he or she is on duty:
( 2 ) While he or she is wearing a uniform, badge, or insignia that identifies the employing agency or instrumentality or the position of the employee;
( 3 ) While he or she is in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by an individual employed or holding office in the Government of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof; or
( 4 ) While using a Government-owned or leased vehicle or while using a privately owned vehicle in the discharge of official duties.
( d ) An employee described in 5 U.S.C. 7324(b)(2) may participate in political activity otherwise prohibited by § 733.104(c) if the costs associated with that political activity are not paid for by money derived from the Treasury of the United States.
( e ) Candidacy for, and service in, a partisan political office shall not result in neglect of, or interference with, the performance of the duties of the employee or create a conflict, or apparent conflict, of interest.
### subpart 1—education and training for judges and court personnel in state courts
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zonagen, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Louis Ploth, Jr., Vice President Business Development and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 9, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis Ploth, Jr.Vice President Business Developmentand Chief Financial OfficerZonagen, Inc.
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zonagen
and will be retained by Zonagen and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.