alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Neal  Ludeke,  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

/s/  Neal Ludeke
-----------------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman American
Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant
November 14, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 12(a).2

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  Hanaro Telecom, Inc. (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

                  I, YOUNG WAN CHO, Vice President/Head of the Financial
Strategy Unit (performing similar functions of a chief financial officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

    /s/ Young Wan Cho
----------------------
YOUNG WAN CHO
Vice President/Head of the Financial Strategy Unit
June 5, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hanaro Telecom, Inc., and will be retained by Hanaro Telecom, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Richard P. Crystal, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of New York & Company, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the period presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: September 13,  2005 |   | /s/ RICHARD P.  CRYSTAL                 |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Richard P. Crystal                      |
|                           |   | *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and* |
|                           |   | *President*                             |

 

----
### §701b–11. Flood protection projects

#### (a) General considerations; nonstructural alternatives

In the survey, planning, or design by any Federal agency of any project involving flood protection, consideration shall be given to nonstructural alternatives to prevent or reduce flood damages, with a view toward formulating the most economically, socially, and environmentally acceptable means of reducing or preventing flood damage, including—

(1) floodproofing of structures, including through elevation;

(2) floodplain regulation;

(3) acquisition of floodplain land for recreational, fish and wildlife, and other public purposes;

(4) relocation; and

(5) the use of a feature described in section 2289a(a) of this title.

#### (b) Non-Federal participation through nonstructural alternatives; limitation

Where a nonstructural alternative is recommended, non-Federal participation shall be comparable to the value of lands, easements, and rights-of-way which would have been required of non-Federal interests under section 701c of this title, for structural protection measures, but in no event shall exceed 20 per centum of the project costs.

(Pub. L. 93–251, title I, §73, Mar. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 32; Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title I, §115(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2627.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–260 substituted ", with a view toward formulating the most economically, socially, and environmentally acceptable means of reducing or preventing flood damage, including—" and pars. (1) to (5) for "including, but not limited to, floodproofing of structures; flood plain regulation; acquisition of flood plain lands for recreational, fish and wildlife, and other public purposes; and relocation with a view toward formulating the most economically, socially, and environmentally acceptable means of reducing or preventing flood damages."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Nonstructural Flood Control Policy

Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §202(d), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3675, provided that:

"(1) Review.—The Secretary shall conduct a review of policies, procedures, and techniques relating to the evaluation and development of flood control measures with a view toward identifying impediments that may exist to justifying nonstructural flood control measures as alternatives to structural measures.

"(2) Report.—Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 12, 1996], the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the findings of the review conducted under this subsection, together with any recommendations for modifying existing law to remove any impediments identified under such review."
No: II-07-043 September 10, 2007 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC SENDS AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW 

ELECTRICAL BREAKERS ISSUE AT ALABAMA NUCLEAR PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is sending an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to 

review the failures of electrical breakers for component cooling water pumps at the Farley 

nuclear power plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company near Dothan in southern 

Alabama. The component cooling water system circulates water through a closed system, 

similar to the cooling system in a car, to cool many plant systems and components. 

An AIT is formed to review the circumstances surrounding more significant issues at 

NRC-licensed facilities. The NRC inspection team includes inspectors and specialists from the 

agency=s Region II office in Atlanta and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. The team 

is expected to spend about a week at the site and will hold a public exit meeting to present the 

preliminary inspection results a few days later. In addition, a written report will be issued within 

30 days of the end of inspection. 

On September 4 and 5, two different electrical breakers associated with component 

cooling water pumps on Unit 1 failed to close during testing. The breakers were replaced and 

Southern Nuclear is troubleshooting the failed breakers. Because the Farley plant has 

experienced previous breaker issues and this condition has the potential to be applicable to 

similar breakers in safety-related systems on both Unit 1 and Unit 2, the NRC staff determined 

an AIT was appropriate. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §10615. Applications

To request funds under this subchapter, the chief executive or the chief justice of a State or the chief executive or judge of a unit of local government or Indian tribal government, or the chief judge of a State court or the judge of a local court or Indian tribal court shall submit an application to the Attorney General in such form and containing such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2955, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title II, §2301(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1797.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797u–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
# L_2016341EN.01006901.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/69

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 169/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2204]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 on amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 on amending Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 on the list of aircraft operators that performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 21as (Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 0180: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 (OJ L 34, 10.2.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 0180: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/180 of 9 February 2015 (OJ L 34, 10.2.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/180 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 34, 10.2.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 2601.101 Authority.

Section 2 of the Office of Government Ethics Authorization Act of 1996, amending the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as codified at 5 U.S.C. app. 403(b), authorizes the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) to accept and utilize gifts for the purpose of aiding or facilitating the work of OGE.
§ 1655.18 Spousal rights. ( a ) *Spouse of CSRS participant.* ( 1 ) Before a loan is disbursed to a CSRS participant, the TSP record keeper will send a notice to the participant's current spouse that the participant has applied for a loan.
( 2 ) A CSRS participant may obtain an exception to the requirement described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section if the participant establishes, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, that the spouse's whereabouts are unknown as described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Spouse of FERS or uniformed services participant.* ( 1 ) Before a loan agreement is approved for a FERS or uniformed services participant, the spouse must consent to the loan by signing the loan agreement.
( 2 ) A FERS or uniformed services participant may obtain an exception to the requirement described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section if the participant establishes, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, that: ( i ) The spouse's whereabouts are unknown; or
( ii ) Exceptional circumstances prevent the participant from obtaining the spouse's consent.
( c ) *Exception to spousal requirements.* The procedures for obtaining an exception to the spousal requirements described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) of this section are the same as the procedures described in 5 CFR part 1650, subpart G.
( d ) *Certification of truthfulness.* By completing a loan request, the participant certifies, under penalty of perjury, that all information provided to the TSP record keeper during the loan process is true and complete, including statements concerning the participant's marital status, the spouse's email or physical address at the time the application is filed, or the current spouse's consent to the loan.
[68 FR 35515, June 13, 2003, as amended at 68 FR 74451, Dec. 23, 2003; 87 FR 31694, May 24, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24898]



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2004 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 67039]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

20 CFR Part 404


Revised Medical Criteria for Evaluating Hematological Disorders 
and Malignant Neoplastic Diseases

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Proposed rule; partial withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are withdrawing the rules we proposed for evaluating 
hematological disorders that were included in the Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register on November 27, 
2001 (66 FR 59306). In that NPRM, we proposed revisions to both the 
listings for hematological disorders and the listings for malignant 
neoplastic diseases. The public comments we received on the NPRM raised 
significant issues about the proposed listings for some of the 
hematological disorders, and we have decided to withdraw the proposed 
rules for hematological disorders while we obtain additional input to 
resolve these issues. We plan to publish a new NPRM for the 
hematological disorders listings at a later date. We are publishing 
separately in today's edition of the Federal Register final rules for 
evaluating malignant neoplastic diseases.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Sussman, Regulations Officer, 
Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration, 100 Altmeyer 
Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, 
(410) 965-1767 or TTY (410) 966-5609. For information on eligibility or 
filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 
or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet Web site, Social Security 
Online, at http://www.socialsecurity.gov/.

    Dated: July 19, 2004.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 04-24898 Filed 11-12-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
No. 07-100 August 14, 2007

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, SEPTEMBER 6-8

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)will hold a public meeting Sept. 6-8, in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, a final reviewof the license renewal application for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. In addition, the committeewill discuss the draft ACRS report on the NRC safety research program and review a draft report onthe quality of selected NRC research projects.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants andrelated safety issues. 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at11545 Rockville Pike. The session on Thursday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; Friday’s sessionis from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; Saturday’s session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. A completeagenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2007.

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting shouldcontact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. To pursue video conferencing services, contact TheronBrown, at 301-415-8066.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link.E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.NRC

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
#### Samuel Honig, Respondent, v. Edlill Realty Co., Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appeal from a portion of an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Sullivan County, on November 17, 1952, granting plaintiff’s motion for an examination of certain defendants before trial. Appellant *objects only to*that portion of the order which requires the examination of Thomas Raphael within the State of New York. The order requires the examination of the corporate defendant by Harry C. Resnick, its president, and Thomas Raphael, its secretary and treasurer, in Sullivan County, New York. Resniek, the president, is willing to appear and testify. It appears without dispute that the evidence of Thomas Raphael would be cumulative. It is also without dispute that Thomas Raphael is, and has been for approximately one year prior to the motion, a resident of the State of Florida. His testimony might be acquired by interrogatories or deposition taken there. Under these circumstances we regard it as an unreasonable hardship and unnecessary expense to the defendants to produce him personally for examination in Sullivan County. *(Bolognino*v. *Anheuser-Busch,*279 App. Div. 819.) Order modified, on the law and facts, by striking therefrom the requirement that Thomas Raphael attend for examination in Sullivan County, New York, and as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs to appellant. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy Halterman, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Leroy
Halterman


Leroy
Halterman


President,
Secretary & Treasurer


(principal
executive and financial officer)







Date:  June
10, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hechinger Liquidation Trust on Form 10-Q for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Conrad F. Hocking, the Liquidation Trustee of the Liquidation Trust,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Liquidation Trust. Date:  February 14, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Conrad F. HockingConrad F. HockingLiquidation Trustee 24