alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 17, 2016



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM MARSH RICE U NIVERSITY AND GARY S PEARS , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 13

- 00235

- CV V.

RASHEED R E FAEY

, Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the order signed on February 21, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the order . We therefore order the order of the court below REVERSED and
RENDER judgment that Defendants’ Second Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that appellee Rasheed Refaey take nothing by his claims against appellants William Marsh Rice University and Gary Spears. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellee Rasheed R e faey.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of
China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, WU Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |               |  |  |  |                               
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: |  | June 29, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Wu Yuxiang                
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Name: WU Yuxiang              
|      |  |               | 
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24226-24227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10106]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

28 CFR Part 16

[CPCLO Order No. 005-2015]

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

[[Page 24227]]

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (the Department or DOJ) published a 
proposed rule in the Federal Register on March 26, 2015 (80 FR 15951), 
which added a new section to the Department's Privacy Act exemption 
regulations to exempt a DOJ-wide system of records from certain 
subsections of the Privacy Act. The heading of the document referenced 
``CPCLO Order No. 004-2014'' when the Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties 
Order (CPCLO) number should read 004-2015. This document corrects the 
CPCLO number.

DATES: This correction is effective on April 30, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Moss, Privacy Analyst, 202-514-
8568.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 26, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-06938, 
on page 15951, in the heading, second line, correct the number to read:
    [CPCLO Order No. 004-2015]

    Dated: April 2, 2015.
Kristi Lane Scott,
Deputy Director, Office of Privacy and Civil Liberties, United States 
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015-10106 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-FB-P
```
## StateofWashington 

# •

JOHNSPELLMAN,Governor 

### June 

### 29, 1984 OFFICEOFTHEGOVERNOR ;t.,

. 

# R[CI'IVE1J Ms. Ernesta .B. Barnes Regional Administrator, Region 10

. 

### JUL 21984 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Sixth Avenue 

### OFFICE OF Sea.ttle, Washington 98101 

### REGIONAL

### ADM1Nl_~ 't 

### : Dear Ms. i3a·rnes: In accordance with Public Law 94-580, Subtitle C, .Section 3006(c), 1976, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),'the state 'of Washington hereby applies for Final Authorization for the Washington State Department of Ecology to administer the State Dangerous Waste Management Program in' lieu of the Federal Hazardous .Waste Program.

. The enclosed application and its component parts represent eight years of development since the original enactment of state dangerous waste legislation in 1976. Updates and amendments in 

### 1980, 1983, and 1984, have resulted .in ouicurrent legislation enabling the Department of Ecology to develop a program**cop.si~tentand** equivalent to RCRA. 'the Department·, s recent adoption of amendments to itsdangerolls waste**tegula~ionsfurther** demonstrates the state's intent to comply with ReRA. We feel that the evidence submitted in this application will**sh6~** .that the ,state program is both consistent with and equivalent to the Federal program and,as such,should be'granted full Final Authorization. Once again, as in the application for Interim Authorization" I would like to extend my appreciation to the Environmental Protection Agency's Region 10 and the headquarters hazardous waste personnel who provided our staff with a continuous review and comments on the component parts of the final**appli~ationas** it was developed. If there, are any questions or .if additional information is needed, please contact Mr

. Donald W. Moos , Di·rector of the Washington Department of Ecology. With best wishes,

Enclosure

cc: Washington State Congressional Delegation, w/o enclosure .DonaldW. Moos, Director .Dep'artment of Ecology 

# • J\ LegislativeBuilding

_ Olympia, Washington98504 @ (206) 753-6780

_ (Scan) 234-6780**~3**

# o

" ,

(

, ' 

## I,

PROGRAM D[VllOPMth,**~tCTtON** 

# o
# L_2018089EN.01001201.xml

| 5.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/12

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 209/2016

of 28 October 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/530]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 2016 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 2016 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zze (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 0918: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 2016 (OJ L 156, 14.6.2016, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 0918: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/918 of 19 May 2016 (OJ L 156, 14.6.2016, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/918 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 29 October 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 156, 14.6.2016, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Tozai Koeki Kaisha, Ltd., Appellant, v. Trans-America Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Unex Credit Corporation, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Breitel and Botein, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 833; 283 App. Div. 656.]
#### § 6.2 Schedules of excepted positions.

OPM shall list positions that it excepts from the competitive service in Schedules A, B, C, and D, and it shall list the position of administrative law judge in Schedule E, which schedules shall constitute parts of this rule, as follows:

Schedule A. Positions other than those of a confidential or policy-determining character for which it is not practicable to examine shall be listed in Schedule A.

Schedule B. Positions other than those of a confidential or policy-determining character for which it is not practicable to hold a competitive examination shall be listed in Schedule B. Appointments to these positions shall be subject to such noncompetitive examination as may be prescribed by OPM.

Schedule C. Positions of a confidential or policy-determining character shall be listed in Schedule C.

Schedule D. Positions other than those of a confidential or policy-determining character for which the competitive service requirements make impracticable the adequate recruitment of sufficient numbers of students attending qualifying educational institutions or individuals who have recently completed qualifying educational programs shall be listed in Schedule D. These positions are temporarily placed in the excepted service to enable more effective recruitment from all segments of society by using means of recruiting and assessing candidates that diverge from the rules generally applicable to the competitive service.

Schedule E. Positions of administrative law judge appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105 shall be listed in Schedule E. Conditions of good administration warrant placing the position of administrative law judge in the excepted service and exempting appointment to this position from the requirements of 5 CFR, part 302, including examination and rating requirements, though each agency shall follow the principle of veteran preference as far as administratively feasible.

[E.O. 14029, 86 FR 27025, May 19, 2021]
§ 8101.103 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) *Prior approval requirement.* Before engaging in any outside employment, with or without compensation, an employee, other than a special Government employee. shall obtain prior written approval from his or her supervisor and the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) or Alternate DAEO. The Request for Approval of Outside Activity (CPSC Form 241), available from the DAEO or unit administrative officer, may be used to request approval. Requests for approval shall be forwarded through normal supervisory channels.
( b ) *Standard of approval.* Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by Federal statute or regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
( c ) *Notification of action.* Employees will be notified in writing of the action taken on their requests. All requests will be maintained in the files of the Designated Agency Ethics Official for the duration of the requester's CPSC employment.
( d ) *Duration and scope of approval.* Approval will be for a period not to exceed two years, after which renewal approval must be sought. An employment must submit a new request for approval after two years or earlier upon either a significant change in the nature or scope of the outside employment or a change in the employee's CPSC position.
( e ) *Definition of employment.* For purposes of this section, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment, business relationship or activity involving the provision of personal services by the employee, whether or not for compensation. Employment includes, but is not limited to, personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher or speaker. Employment also includes writing when done under an arrangement with another person for production or publication of the written product. Employment does not, however, include participation in the activities of a nonprofit charitable, religious, professional, social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service, consumer or civic organization, unless such activities are for compensation other than reimbursement for expenses or involve the provision of professional services or advice to, or serving as an officer, trustee, or member of a board or other such body of, an organization that is a prohibited source as defined in 5 CFR 2635.203(d).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Old Florida Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Larry W. Johnson, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  October 30, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Larry W. Johnson                                  
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |     |  | Larry W. Johnson, President andChief Executive Officer
### §4251. Incentive for fishermen to collect and dispose of plastic found at sea

#### (a) In general

The Under Secretary shall establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing incentives, such as grants, to fishermen based in the United States who incidentally capture marine debris while at sea—

(1) to track or keep the debris on board; and

(2) to dispose of the debris properly on land.

#### (b) Support for collection and removal of derelict gear

The Under Secretary shall encourage United States efforts, such as the Fishing for Energy net disposal program, that support—

(1) collection and removal of derelict fishing gear and other fishing waste;

(2) disposal or recycling of such gear and waste; and

(3) prevention of the loss of such gear.

(Pub. L. 116–224, title I, §137, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1086.)
§ 2424.40 Authority decision and order. ( a ) *Issuance.* Subject to the requirements of this part, the Authority will expedite proceedings under this part to the extent practicable and will issue to the exclusive representative and to the agency a written decision, explaining the specific reasons for the decision, at the earliest practicable date. The decision will include an order, as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, but, with the exception of an order to bargain, such order will not include remedies that could be obtained in an unfair labor practice proceeding under 5 U.S.C. 7118(a)(7).
( b ) *Cases involving proposals.* If the Authority finds that the duty to bargain extends to the proposal, then the Authority will order the agency to bargain concerning the proposal. If the Authority finds that the duty to bargain does not extend to the proposal, then the Authority will dismiss the petition for review as to that proposal. If the Authority finds that the proposal is bargainable only at the election of the agency, then the Authority will so state. If the Authority resolves a negotiability dispute by finding that a proposal is within the duty to bargain, but there are unresolved bargaining obligation dispute claims, then the Authority will order the agency to bargain in the event its bargaining obligation claims are resolved in a manner that requires bargaining.
( c ) *Cases involving provisions.* If the Authority finds that a provision is not contrary to law, rule, or regulation, or is bargainable at the election of the agency, then the Authority will direct the agency to rescind its disapproval of such provision in whole or in part as appropriate. If the Authority finds that a provision is contrary to law, rule, or regulation, then the Authority will dismiss the petition for review as to that provision.
[63 FR 66413, Dec. 2, 1998, as amended at 88 FR 62459, Sept. 12, 2023; 88 FR 69873, Oct. 10, 2023]
### §10633. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §504(g)(1), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5234

Section, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2978, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §111, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 669, related to State, Tribal, and local reentry courts.

Section was formerly classified to section 3797w–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
# L_2018089EN.01002002.xml

| 5.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/20

---

Corrigendum to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 167/2015 of 11 June 2015 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2202]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 341 of 15 December 2016
  )

On page 66, in points 1 and 2 of Article 1 of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 167/2015, the CELEX number is replaced as follows:

for:

‘
  32015 R 0345
  ’,

32015 R 0345

read:

‘
  32015 D 0345
  ’.

32015 D 0345

---
### §10477. Report

A State, Indian tribal government, or unit of local government that receives funds under this subchapter during a fiscal year shall submit to the Attorney General a report in March of the following year regarding the effectiveness of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2207, as added Pub. L. 106–515, §3(a), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2402.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ii–6 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2207 of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title V, §50001(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1957, related to geographic distribution of grant awards, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title I, §114(b)(1)(A)], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–21; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-4345

___________ Harvey Hudspeth, Jr.; Estate of Staci * K. Hudspeth; Estate of Matthew Shane * Hudspeth, a minor, by Harvey Hudspeth, * his father, natural guardian and next * friend, * * Appeal from the United States Appellants, * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * City of Sherwood, Arkansas; * Leonard Carver, III, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 15, 2000 Filed: November 13, 2000

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After a June 1, 1995, altercation with a Sherwood, Arkansas, police officer, Staci K. Hudspeth was charged with the misdemeanor offenses of third degree battery and obstructing a governmental operation. During the criminal proceedings, her attorney agreed, on Hudspeth’s behalf, that Hudspeth would forego a civil suit against the police1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- officer or the city in exchange for the termination of the proceedings. The city dis missed the charges, and shortly thereafter Hudspeth died of brain cancer. Some three years later, Hudspeth’s estate and survivors brought a civil action against the police officer and the city and now appeal from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgmentin favor of the defendants based on the court’s conclusion that a valid releasedismissal agreement barred the civil suit. See, e.g. , Woods v. Rhodes , 994 F.2d 494, 502 (8th Cir. 1993). Having considered the record and the parties’ submissions, we are satisfiedthat the court reached the correct result and conclude that a detailed opinion wouldhave no precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1188 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2008 - SW - 46 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**