alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.28

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                             DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2003
                                     BETWEEN
                         KENNETH LEVINE (THE "EMPLOYEE")
                                       AND
                DIAMOND TRIUMPH AUTO GLASS, INC. (THE "COMPANY")

The Employee and Company acknowledge and agree that on March 15, 2004 the
Employee and the Company mutually agreed to reduce the Employee's annual base
salary from $320,000.00 per annum to $52,000.00 per annum and that such base
salary remained at that level from such date until February 27, 2005.

The Employee and the Company further acknowledge and agree that effective
February 28, 2005 the Company shall increase the Employee's annual base salary
from $52,000.00 per annum to $320,000.00 per annum in accordance with the terms
of the original Employment Agreement.

In addition to the above, the Employee shall serve in the capacity of the
Chairman of the Board during the term of the Employment Agreement.

The Employee and the Company acknowledge that the other terms and conditions set
forth in the Employment Agreement dated November 17, 2003 between the Employee
and the Company shall remain in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Amendment:

                                    DIAMOND TRIUMPH AUTO GLASS, INC.

                                    BY: /s/ Norman Harris
                                        ----------------------------
                                        NAME:  NORMAN HARRIS
                                        TITLE: CEO

                                        /s/ Kenneth Levine
                                        ----------------------------
                                        KENNETH LEVINE
Exhibit No. 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

Armstrong Holdings, Inc.

(the Company)

Written Statement by Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the
Companys Form 10-K annual report containing its financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained
in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of that date.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/ Michael D. Lockhart                          
|Michael D. Lockhart                              
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc.                         

Dated: April 16, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24562]



[[Page 64106]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--InterNational Electrical Testing Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), InterNational Electrical 
Testing Association (``NETA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: InterNational 
Electrical Testing Association, Morrison, CO. The nature and scope of 
NETA's standards development activities are: To provide electrical 
acceptance testing standards and specifications which provide 
requirements for the testing of newly installed electrical equipment 
and systems, and to provide electrical maintenance testing standards 
and specifications which provide requirements for the testing of 
existing electrical facilities.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24562 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000199 23-DEC-2016 08:31 AM
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0126 - Proposed Rulemaking - Power Reactor Security Requirements (RIN 3150-AG63)

Accession Number: ML060830634

Date Released: Wednesday, June 7, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML060830629 - SECY-06-0126 - Proposed Rulemaking - Power Reactor Security Requirements (RIN 3150-AG63) (12 page(s), 5/31/2006)
    - ML060830633 - SECY-06-0126 - Attachment 1 - FRN -  Power Reactor Security Requirements (15 page(s), 5/31/2006)
    - ML060930319 - SECY-06-0126 - Attachment 2 - Proposed NRC Form 754 (3 page(s), 5/31/2006)
    - ML061380803 - SECY-06-0126 - Attachment 3 - Draft regulatory analysis and backfit analysis (33 page(s), 5/31/2006)
    - ML060890598 - SECY-06-0126 - Attachment 4 - Environmental Assessement Supporting Proposed Rule, Power Reactors Security Requirements (10 page(s), 5/31/2006)
    - ML061380796 - SECY-06-0126 - Attachment 3 - Appendix A - Incremental Licensee Activities and Cost Equations for Individual Provisions of the Proposed Rule (18 page(s), 5/31/2006)
    - ML061440013 - SECY-06-0126 - Attachment 3 - Appendix B - Incremental NRC Activities and Cost Equations for Individual Provisions of the Proposed Rule (4 page(s), 5/31/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS15334 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
| Searched for all pages on **http://www.cnet.com** | Results **1** - **10** of about **33549** |
|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
§ 1209.8 Filing a request for a stay. ( a ) *Time of filing.* An appellant may request a stay of a personnel action allegedly based on whistleblowing at any time after the appellant becomes eligible to file an appeal with the Board under § 1209.5 of this part, but no later than the time limit set for the close of discovery in the appeal. The request may be filed prior to, simultaneous with, or after the filing of an appeal.
( b ) *Place of filing.* Requests must be filed with the appropriate Board regional or field office as set forth in 5 CFR 1201.4(d).
( c ) *Service of stay request.* A stay request must be simultaneously served upon the Board's regional or field office and upon the agency's local servicing personnel office or the agency's designated representative, if any. A certificate of service stating how and when service was made must accompany the stay request.
( d ) *Method of filing.* A stay request must be filed with the appropriate Board regional or field office by mail, by facsimile, by commercial or personal delivery, or by electronic filing in accordance with § 1201.14 of this chapter.
[55 FR 28592, July 12, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 36345, July 7, 1993, 59 FR 65243, Dec. 19, 1994; 68 FR 59865, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57631, Sept. 27, 2004]
### §579. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–640, title I, §119(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4630

Section, Pub. L. 93–251, title I, §12, Mar. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 16; H. Res. 988, Oct. 8, 1974; Pub. L. 94–587, §157(a), Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2933; S. Res. 4, Feb. 4, 1977, provided for deauthorization of projects of improvement of rivers and harbors and other waterways for navigation, beach erosion, flood control, and other purposes which the Secretary of the Army determined should no longer be authorized.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2014212EN.01004501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 212/45 |

---

DECISION No 43/2014 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 15 April 2014

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

(2014/474/EU)

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Articles 7 and 14,

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | The Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Bodies indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James SANFORD

Signed in Washington on 23 June 2014

On behalf of the European Union

Fernando PERREAU DE PINNINCK

Signed in Brussels on 1 July 2014

---

Attachment A

EC Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

| | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | ALTER TECHNOLOGY TÜV NORD, S.A.U. | | ATN EC | | Emilia Santiago & Jorge Berkowitsch | | C/la Majada, 3 | | 28760 — Tres Cantos (Madrid) | | SPAIN | | | | --- | | M. DUDDE HOCHFREQUENZ-TECHNIK | | Rottland 5a | | 51429 — Bergisch Gladbach | | GERMANY | |

---
Docket Management Facility

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12 – 140

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing to request a 60-day extension to the comment period for the notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) published under Docket FAA-2015-0150. The comment period outlined in this 

NPRM is currently scheduled to expire on April 24, 2015. We respectfully request a 60-day extension to 

keep the comment period open until May 24, 2015.

We knew this NPRM was coming, but the timing was terrible for us. It was issued in the closing 

days of February right at the peak of our final preparations for our annual industry trade show, HELIEXPO. Our show did provide a good opportunity for Jim Williams and Bill Crozier from the FAA’s 

office of UAS integration to spread the word about the NPRM to a large crowd of helicopter 

professionals. However, it didn’t give us or our industry adequate time to analyze and seriously discuss 

the particulars of the proposed rule.

We need to get this right. The integration of unmanned aircraft into the National Airspace 

System will indisputably impact more directly, and more significantly, the safety and the economic 

futures of helicopter operators, pilots and professionals than any other segment of the industry. In 

particular, this first installment of rulemaking for UAS, which is limited to “small” aircraft, will have a 

significant impact on our segment. This rule, when finalized, will unleash thousands of commercial UAS 

into the low level airspace where currently only helicopters work. That makes safety a major concern for 

us.

At the same time, we realize, that unmanned technology will create new competition for 

helicopter operators in many mission areas. However, we also believe that in many of these areas, we 

have the experience to put this new technology to use ourselves, to expand helicopter opportunities to 

provide new services and supplement existing operations. But again, to create these new opportunities, 

we need to get this NPRM right.

Please give us a 60-day extension in the official comment period for docket FAA-2015-0150. 

Sincerely,

Matthew S. Zuccaro

HAI President and CEO
### Part C—Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Block Grant Program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part C of title II of Pub. L. 93–415 related to national programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12210(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1880.
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Take A Ride, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for theperiod ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)				or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
-  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all				material respects, the financial condition and results of				operations of the Company.

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                           

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief AccountingOfficer

February 7, 2005
Exhibit 12.2.  Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Dr. Klaus Hartmann,
certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form
20-F of Magyar Telekom;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.     The Companys other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:  a.) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  b.)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of 
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and  c.)
Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.     The Companys other certifying officer and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of
Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a.)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and  b.)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.   Date: May 11, 2005By:
  /s/ Dr. Klaus
  HartmannName:
  Dr. Klaus
  HartmannTitle:
  Chief Financial
  Officer
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1788

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the minimum 

Medicare deadlines for filing claims to take into account delay in processing adjustments from secondary payor status to primary payor status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. COSTELLO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

the minimum Medicare deadlines for filing claims to 

take into account delay in processing adjustments from 

secondary payor status to primary payor status.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1788 IH 

1 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN MINIMUM MEDICARE CLAIMS 

2 FILING DEADLINES TO ACCOUNT FOR DELAY 

3 IN PROCESSING ADJUSTMENTS FROM SEC4 ONDARY TO PRIMARY PAYOR STATUS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 1814(a)(1) and 

6 1835(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1395f(a)(1), 1395n(a)(1)) are each amended by inserting 

8 ‘‘(but, in the case of items and services furnished to an 

9 individual during the period beginning on the date the in10 dividual’s status under section 1862(b)(2) changes from 

11 having a group health plan that is primary plan to no 

12 longer having such a plan that is a primary plan and end13 ing on the date of completion of the change of status, end14 ing no earlier than 1 year after the date of completion 

15 of the change of status)’’ after ‘‘1 calendar year’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE; TRANSITION.—(1) The 

17 amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply to items 

18 and services furnished on or after August 10, 1993. 

19 (2) In the case of claims for items and services de20 scribed in the matter inserted by the amendments made 

21 by subsection (a) and furnished on or after August 10, 

22 1993, and before the date of the enactment of this Act, 

23 notwithstanding any other provision of law, the deadline 

24 for submission of such claims under parts A and B of title 

25 XVIII of the Social Security Act shall in no case expire 
3

•HR 1788 IH 

1 before the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
- ·, '- , r ,......,... 

SERVED: May 12,2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF·HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MARCO FIMBRES 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2015-0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE 

AND 

AMENDEDPROCEDURALORDER 

·'; 

On March 3, 2015, we issued our Procedural Order. On April 8, 2015 the Federal 

Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted. 

We issued an Amended Order to Show Cause on April 28, 2015. On March 28, 2015, 

Marco Fimbres (hereinafter "Fimbres") filed his Answer which was not in the file. 

We will vacate our Order to Show Cause and extend times to comply with our 

Procedural Order. Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as 

follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

1. Our Order to Show Cause dated April 28, 2015, be and is hereby VACATED; and 

2. On or before July I, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including. but 

not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

and 

3. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or allcr July I, 

2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming. in a separate Order. 

~.-I 

..:..· .} t 
Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 

2 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

·ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI 0001 

Marco A. Fimbres, Respondent 

4444 East Benson Highway, Trir 21 

Tucson, AZ 85706 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.6 

Weste.rn-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 3 I 0-725-71 17 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin. Administrative Law .Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 15-0204 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier. use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington. 

DC 20591: Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

3
United States 

Environmental Protection Agency(6609J)Washington, DC 20460Official BusinessPenalty for Private Use$300EPA 402-K-01-003
A VISION FOR THE 21 S T CENTURY

United States 

Environmental Protection 

Agency

Office of Air and Radiation

(6609J)

EPA 402-K-01-003

October 2001

HEALTHY BUILDINGS,HEALTHY PEOPLE: