alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015230EN.01001801.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/18

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 219/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1443]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 474/2014 of 8 May 2014 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (‘REACH’) as regards 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 474/2014 of 8 May 2014 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (‘REACH’) as regards 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0474: Commission Regulation (EU) No 474/2014 of 8 May 2014 (OJ L 136, 9.5.2014, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0474: Commission Regulation (EU) No 474/2014 of 8 May 2014 (OJ L 136, 9.5.2014, p. 19).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 474/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 136, 9.5.2014, p. 19.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F (the annual report) of Oromin Explorations Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 31, 2007



(signed):     Naomi Corrigan



Naomi Corrigan

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                              <C>                   <C>

                                                                                               Exhibit 21
                                            ONIX SYSTEMS INC.

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
      At February 28, 1999, the Registrant owned the following companies:

                                                                      STATE OR             REGISTRANT'S
                                                                   JURISDICTION OF     PERCENT OF OWNERSHIP
                             NAME                                   INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Brandt Instruments, Inc.                                            Delaware                  100
  CAC Inc.                                                            Delaware                  100
    Flow Automation Inc.                                                Texas                   100
    Lots 82 and 83, Inc.                                              Louisiana                 100
    Mid-South Power Systems, Inc.                                     Louisiana                 100
    Mid-South Controls & Services, Inc.                               Louisiana                 100
    Thermo Instrument Controls de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                 Mexico                   100
    (1% of which shares are owned directly by ONIX Systems Inc.)
  ONIX Process Analysis Inc.                                            Texas                   100
  OnIX Holdings Limited                                                England                  100
    CAC Limited                                                   England and Wales             100
    ONIX Measurement Limited                                      England and Wales             100
      Peek Environmental Limited                                  England and Wales             100
      Sarasota Data Products Limited                              England and Wales             100
      Sarasota Instrumentation Limited                            England and Wales             100
    VG Gas Analysis Limited                                       England and Wales             100
  Polysonics, Inc.                                                      Texas                   100
  TN Spectrace Europe B.V.                                           Netherlands                100
  TN Technologies Inc.                                                  Texas                   100
    Kay-Ray/Sensall, Inc.                                             Delaware                  100
    TN Technologies Canada Inc.                                        Canada                   100
  Westronics Inc.                                                       Texas                   100
</TABLE>
### §10181. Application requirements

(a) No grant may be made under this part unless an application has been submitted to the Director in which the applicant—

(1) sets forth a program or project which is eligible for funding pursuant to section 10171 of this title;

(2) describes the services to be provided, performance goals, and the manner in which the program is to be carried out;

(3) describes the method to be used to evaluate the program or project in order to determine its impact and effectiveness in achieving the stated goals; and

(4) agrees to conduct such evaluation according to the procedures and terms established by the Bureau.

(b) Each applicant for funds under this part shall certify that its program or project meets all the applicable requirements of this section, that all the applicable information contained in the application is correct, and that the applicant will comply with all the applicable provisions of this part and all other applicable Federal laws. Such certification shall be made in a form acceptable to the Director.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §517, formerly §513, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6091(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4336; renumbered §517 and amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XVIII, §1801(a)(4), (6), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4847; Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1111(c)(2)(A), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3763 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section. Some section numbers or references in amendment notes below reflect the classification of such sections or references prior to editorial reclassification.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 517 of Pub. L. 90–351, title I, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 207; Pub. L. 91–644, title I, §7(6), Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1887; Pub. L. 93–83, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 213, provided for personnel of Administration, prior to the general amendment of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 96–157.

#### Amendments

2006—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–162 substituted "pursuant to section 3762a" for "pursuant to section 3761 or 3762a".

1990—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 101–647, §1801(a)(4)(A), inserted "or 3762a" after "3761".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–647, §1801(a)(4)(B), inserted "applicable" after "all the" in three places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–162 applicable with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after Jan. 5, 2006, and each fiscal year thereafter, see section 1111(d) of Pub. L. 109–162, set out as a note under section 10151 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

Effective Aug. 1, 2000, all functions of Director of Bureau of Justice Assistance, other than those enumerated in section 10142(3) to (6) of this title, transferred to Assistant Attorney General for Office of Justice Programs, see section 1000(a)(1) [title I, §108(b)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 10141 of this title.
#### § 180.103 Time limitations.

A claim must be presented in writing within 2 years after it accrues, except during war or armed conflict. If war or armed conflict occurs within the 2-year period following accrual, when claimant shows good cause, the claim may be presented within 2 years after the cause ceases to exist but not more than 2 years after termination of the war or armed conflict. A claim accrues when loss or damage is or should have been discovered by claimant even though such loss or damage occurred at a prior time.
§ 630.1212 Greater leave entitlements. ( a ) An agency shall comply with any collective bargaining agreement or any agency employment benefit program or plan that provides greater family or medical leave entitlements to employees than those provided under this subpart. Nothing in this subpart prevents an agency from amending such policies, provided the policies comply with the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The entitlements established for employees under this subpart may not be diminished by any collective bargaining agreement or any employment benefit program or plan.
( c ) An agency may adopt leave policies more generous than those provided in this subpart, except that such policies may not provide entitlement to paid time off in an amount greater than that otherwise authorized by law or provide sick leaved in any situation in which sick leave would not normally be allowed by law or regulation.
( d ) The entitlements under sections 6381 through 6387 of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart do not modify or affect any Federal law prohibiting discrimination. If the entitlements under sections 6381 through 6387 of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart conflict with any Federal law prohibiting discrimination, an agency must comply with whichever statute provides greater entitlements to employees.
[58 FR 39602, July 23, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 64454, Dec. 5, 1996. Redesignated at 76 FR 60704, Sept. 30, 2011, and further redesignated at 76 FR 60705, Sept. 30, 2011]
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017246EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 26.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 246/10 |

---

DECISION No 2/2017 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND CANADA

of 12 September 2017

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters [2017/1755]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Canada and in particular Articles VII and XI;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment 4 of the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of modifying the Attachments to the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters of the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Signed in Ottawa, on 1 September 2017

Josette GALLANT

On behalf of Canada

Signed in Brussels, on 12 September 2017

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

On behalf of the European Union

---

ATTACHMENT A

EU Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment 4 of the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | CETECOM GmbH | | Im Teelbruch | | 45219 Essen | | GERMANY | |

---
### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL AUTHORITY
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Gonzalez Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00778-CR

Trial court case number: 1380317

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

On March 26, 2014, Appellant filed his Second Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Appellant’s Brief. The motion is GRANTED, in part. Appellant’s brief is due April 15, 2014, 

and no further extensions will be considered. If a brief is not filed by April 15, 2014, this 

appeal will be abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing at which a determination will 

be made as to whether Daniel Gonzales Rodriguez wishes to pursue his appeal, and whether or 

not his appointed counsel, Kurt B. Wentz, has abandoned the appeal and should be allowed to 

withdraw for appointment of new counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/_Justice Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 27, 2014
### §10236. District of Columbia matching fund source

Funds appropriated by the Congress for the activities of any agency of the District of Columbia government or the United States Government performing law enforcement functions in and for the District of Columbia may be used to provide the non-Federal share of the cost of programs or projects funded under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §817, formerly §824, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1214; renumbered §817, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609B(f), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3789m of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 817 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 811 and is classified to section 10230 of this title.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 20168 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee

v.
CARLOS PAUL GONZALEZ , Defendant

- Appell ant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08

- CR

- 76

- 1

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carlos Paul Gonzalez, federal prisoner # 82609

- 179, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud and was sentenced to 135 months of imprisonment. He did not file a direct appeal. The district court
dismissed his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as barred by the waiver contained in Gonzalez’s plea agreement. Subsequently, Gonzalez filed a motion requesting that the district court judge recuse himself and a motion for a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 25, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-20168 Document: 00514570729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/25/2018No. 17

- 20168

2 default judgment. The district court found that there were no proceedings pending before the court from which the district judge could recuse himself or from which the Government could be in default and denied the motions. Gonzalez appeals the denial of the motion to recuse. Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a justice, judg e, or magistrate of the United States is required to recuse himself “in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Section 455(b) requires that he recuse himself in other specified circumstances, including proceedings where he is personally biased. If “a judge’s partiality might reasonably be questioned, recusal is required under § 455(a),” even if the circumstance is not covered by § 455(b). Andrade v. Chojnacki , 338 F.3d 448, 454 (5th Cir. 2003). As there was nothing pe nding before the district court when Gonzalez filed his motion for recusal , t here was no proceeding from which the district court judge could recuse himself under § 455 . Accordingly, Gonzalez’s recusal motion was unauthorized and meaningless. See United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994). Gonzalez’s motions to expedite his appeal, for extraordinary relief, and for oral argument are denied.
AFFIRMED ; MOTIONS DENIED

. Case: 17-20168 Document: 00514570729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/25/2018
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Telik, Inc. (the
Company), and Cynthia M. Butitta, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended; and
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28th day of February, 2007.



|                                                                  |  |                                                                       
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL M.
WICK                                            |  | /s/    CYNTHIA M.
BUTITTA                                             
|Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Cynthia M. Butitta Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Telik, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
DJI PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONAL CHECKLIST

1. DJI PHANTOM 3 PRO AIRCRAFT PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

☐ Gimbal Clamp (Removed; Stowed)

☐ Micro SD Card (Installed; Available Space)

☐ Format SD Card (As Necessary)

☐ Battery (Installed; Status Check Fully Charged)

☐ Propeller (Check Condition; Installed Black On Black, White On White)

☐ CHECK COMPLETE

2. DJI PHANTOM 3 PRO CONTROLLER PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

☐ Tablet, Phone (Mounted, Plugged In)

☐ Sun Shield If Applicable (Mounted, Adjusted)

☐ Antennas (Positioned)

☐ Flight Mode Switch (Desired Position)

☐ Battery (Status Check Fully Charged)

☐ CHECK COMPLETE

3. DJI PHANTOM 3 PRO CONTROLLER BEFORE ENGINE START CHECKLIST

☐ Power On (Controller)

☐ Battery Status (Double Checked)

☐ Controller LED (Green)

☐ Controller Status LED (Checked, No Errors)

☐ Power On (Tablet, Phone)

☐ Unnecessary Apps & Features (Exit, Turn Off)

☐ DJI Pilot App (Launch)

☐ Camera Icon (Select)

☐ Camera Options (Checked, Set)

☐ Compass Calibration (If Different Launch Site)

☐ CHECK COMPLETE
Page 2

4. DJI PHANTOM 3 PRO AIRCRAFT BEFORE ENGINE START CHECKLIST

☐ Aircraft (On A Level Surface)

☐ Propellers (Double Check Tightness)

☐ Power On (Aircraft)

☐ Battery (Status Check Fully Charged, No Errors)

☐ Compass Calibration (If Different Launch Site)

☐ • Interference (Check No Large Metal Surfaces, Cars, Concrete)

☐ • Ferromagnetic Materials (Check No Keys Or Cell Phone On Person Or Near Aircraft)

☐ Proceed With Calibration

☐ Aircraft Status LED’s (Checked, No Errors)

☐ Aircraft (On A Level Surface)

☐ Aircraft Orientation (Nose Away From Operator)

☐ CHECK COMPLETE

5. DJI PHANTOM 3 PRO TAKEOFF CHECKLIST

☐ DJI Pilot App Flight Status (Check Safe To Fly – GPS, Safe To Fly - VPS)

☐ Launch Site (Clear, Safe For Take Off)

☐ Start Motors (Both Control Sticks To Lower - Inner Position)

☐ Take Off (Auto, Manual)

☐ Low Hover (Check Hover Stability)

☐ Flight Controls (Move Each Stick Check Proper Stability & Control)

☐ CHECK COMPLETE

☐ FLY SAFE!!!
#### § 250.206 Human Capital Reviews.

Each agency must participate with OPM in a Human Capital Review (HCR). The HCR will be conducted during the evaluation phase and OPM will issue guidance about the HCR requirements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.209 Employee appeals to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

When an agency denies reemployment to a person claiming reemployment rights under this subpart, the agency shall inform him or her of that denial by a written notice. In the same notice, the agency shall inform him/her of his/her right to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under the provisions of the Board's regulations. The agency shall comply with the provisions of § 1201.21 of this title.

[44 FR 48952, Aug. 21, 1979]