alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 10, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 10, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0825. ROSANN MARTIN v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the use of our report dated
January 25, 2002 in respect of the consolidated financial statements of iDLX
Holdings NV for year ended December 31, 2001 in the Form 10-K of eFunds
Corporation included in Registration Statement File No. 000-30791, and its
incorporation by reference into Registration Nos. 333-51568, 333-51564,
333-51536 and 333-44830 filed on Form S-8.

/s/ Arthur Andersen & Associates

Chennai, India
February 28, 2002

THIS IS A COPY OF A PREVIOUSLY
ISSUED ANDERSEN CONSENT. THIS CONSENT HAS NOT BEEN
REISSUED BY ANDERSEN
Table 3 - Henry Hub gas prices - $/MMBtu

Row #:Year 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 1 Jan 5.146 4.938 4.745 4.581 4.453 4.364 4.292 4.236 2 Feb 5.121 4.913 4.725 4.564 4.438 4.349 4.276 4.220 3 Mar 5.043 4.838 4.655 4.496 4.373 4.284 4.222 4.171 4 Apr 3.763 4.573 4.403 4.244 4.121 4.044 4.017 3.980 5 May 4.759 4.596 4.422 4.263 4.135 4.058 4.029 3.985 6 Jun 4.789 4.629 4.451 4.290 4.159 4.081 4.052 4.007 7 Jul 4.83 4.670 4.489 4.324 4.191 4.113 4.078 4.031 8 Aug 4.87 4.697 4.514 4.346 4.209 4.128 4.089 4.042 9 Sep 4.879 4.702 4.517 4.348 4.211 4.128 4.087 4.038 10Oct 4.927 4.738 4.553 4.381 4.247 4.156 4.109 4.055 11Nov 5.028 4.836 4.643 4.468 4.325 4.218 4.167 4.113 12Dec 5.238 5.041 4.843 4.656 4.496 4.378 4.294 4.222 13Annual 4.866 4.764 4.580 4.413 4.280 4.192 4.143 4.092 14% increase 2.14%4.02%3.77%3.12%2.10%1.18%1.25%2.89% 15Average for 12 months through 8/9/2013: 3.516

Source:http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/energy/natural-gas/natural-gas.html Date: 7/29/13 "Prior Settle" prices for November-December 2013; 12/1/13 "Prior Settle" prices for 2014-21 Source:http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngwhhdm.htm Date: 2012 - October 2013 historical spot price data, downloaded 7-18-13 and 12-1-132014 2013 2012

3.954 3.33 2.67 3.960 3.33 2.51 3.945 3.81 2.17 3.900 4.17 1.95 3.913 4.04 2.43 3.938 3.83 2.46 3.968 3.62 2.95 3.980 3.43 2.84 3.971 3.62 2.85 3.984 3.68 3.32 4.045 3.664 3.54 4.163 3.829 3.34 3.977 3.696 2.753 7.59%34.28%

7/29/13 "Prior Settle" prices for November-December 2013; 12/1/13 "Prior Settle" prices for 2014-21
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Ross M. Strickland, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Webster PreferredCapital Corporation.
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures; and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting and;
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperations of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.   Date: March 11, 2004   By: /s/ Ross M. Strickland    President and Principal Executive Officer
33
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of MabVax Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. David Hansen, Executive Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


April 30, 2015





/s/ J. David HansenJ. David HansenExecutive Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to MabVax Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 754.101 Coverage. ( a ) *Actions covered.* A complaint, or any other information, submitted by an applicant for an appointment to a civil service position relating to compliance with section 9202 of title 5, United States Code.
( b ) *Definitions.* In this subpart, *Agency, applicant, appointing authority,* *conditional offer, criminal history record information,* and *employee* have the meanings set forth in 5 CFR 920.101.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-059 May 14, 2007

NRC APPROVES FINAL RULE ON EXPANDED DEFINITION 

OF BYPRODUCT MATERIAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a final rule expanding the definition of

radioactive materials subject to its regulatory authority, implementing provisions of the Energy Policy

Act of 2005.

The Commission approved the rule by a 5-0 vote affirmed May 14. The final rule will be

published in the Federal Register later this year, after the agency staff incorporates changes to the text

directed by the Commission and obtains approval from the Office of Management and Budget for

information-collection requirements.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 expanded the definition of so-called “byproduct material” subject

to NRC’s authority to include discrete sources of radium-226, material made radioactive in a particle

accelerator, and other radioactive material that the Commission determines could pose a threat to public

health and safety or the common defense and security. Previously, these materials were regulated by the

states.

Although the legislation made NRC’s authority over these new materials effective immediately,

the agency issued a waiver allowing states to continue to regulate them while the agency drafted

regulations to implement the new requirements. The NRC soon will publish a transition plan for

assuming the new authority over these materials. The 34 Agreement States - which regulate byproduct

material in their states under agreements with the NRC - are expected to maintain authority over the new

materials under their agreements with the NRC.

The draft text of the final rule was posted on the NRC Web site last month at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/2007/secy2007-0062/2007-0062scy.p

df. The Commission’s Staff Requirements Memorandum, which details the edits and revisions directed

by the Commission to be incorporated in the rule, will be posted at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/srm/2007/.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. Email notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0127 - Final Rulemaking: Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.44, "Combustible Gas Control in Containment"

Accession Number: ML031670912

Date Released: Thursday, August 28, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML031640408 - SECY-03-0127 - Final Rulemaking -Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.44, "Combustible Gas Control in Containment" (7 page(s), 7/24/2003)
    - ML031640594 - SECY-03-0127-Attachment 1-Final NRC Action on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-68 (2 page(s), 7/24/2003)
    - ML031670903 - SECY-03-0127-Attachment 2-Final NRC Action on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-71 (3 page(s), 7/24/2003)
    - ML031640441 - SECY-03-0127-Attachment3 - Federal Register Notice, 10 CFR Parts 50 and 52, "Combustible Gas Control in Containment" (67 page(s), 7/24/2003)
    - ML031640482 - SECY-03-0127-Attachment 4 - Regulatory Analysis - Final Rulemaking - Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.44, "Combustible Gas Control in Containment" (35 page(s), 7/24/2003)
    - ML031640498 - SECY-03-0127-Attachment 5 - Regulatory Guide 1.7, Control of Combustible Gas Concentrations in Containment (10 page(s), 7/24/2003)
    - ML031640518 - SECY-03-0127-Attachment 6 - Standard Review Plan - NUREG-0800 in Conjunction with Risk-Informed Revision to 50.44, Section 6.2.5, Combustible Gas Control in Containment (12 page(s), 7/24/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 362.408 Termination and reduction in force. ( a ) *Termination.* ( 1 ) An agency may terminate a Fellow for reasons related to misconduct, poor performance, or suitability.
( 2 ) As a condition of employment, a Fellow's appointment expires at the end of the 2-year Program period, plus any agency-approved extension, unless the Participant is selected for noncompetitive conversion. If an agency does not convert a Fellow at the end of the Program, as provided in § 362.409 of this part, or extend the individual's initial appointment under § 362.404, the appointment expires when certification for Program completion is denied or when the Director denies the agency's request for an extension.
( 3 ) The agency must provide written notification to OPM when a Fellow is terminated for any reason.
( b ) *Reduction in force.* Fellows are in the excepted service Tenure Group II for purposes of § 351.502 of this chapter.
Alan Gibson Letter Dated 2/5/04



 EXHIBIT 10.59 
  
 Paul Crowe 
 Chief Executive Officer 

Molecular Imaging 
 2150 West Washington Street 
 Suite 110 
 San Diego, 
 California 92110 
  

	cc:	Evan Mead Stone 


	  	Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek Attn Kirk Ellis 

  
 5th February 2004 
  
 Dear Mr Crowe 
  
 Thank you for your letter of 26th January 2004 advising us of your intention to issue New Securities under a Term Sheet from Ascendiant Securities LLC/Mercator Advisory Group LLC (and certain affiliates). 
  
 Under section 4.07 of the Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 12th, 2002 between Molecular Imaging Corporation (formerly, Mobile PET Systems Inc) (The “Company), Ivan Bradbury and
InHealth Group SA (formerly Integrated Health Care Management SA) (the Agreement) which was subsequently assigned to Dragon Nominees Limited I am pleased to tell you that I am authorised by Dragon Nominees to advise you that Dragon Nominees
Limited wishes to exercise our right of first refusal to purchase all of the New Securities being issued on the terms and conditions set out in that Term Sheet. 
  

This letter therefore serves as our official notice under 4.07 that we intend to step into the position set out in the Term Sheet. 
  
 Yours sincerely 
  
 Alan Gibson 
  
 On Behalf of Dragon Nominees Limited
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hechinger Liquidation Trust on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Conrad F. Hocking, the Liquidation Trustee of the Liquidation Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Liquidation Trust. Date: May 2, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Conrad F. HockingConrad F. HockingLiquidation Trustee
§ 831.1204 Filing disability retirement applications: General. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, an application for disability retirement is timely only if it is filed with the employing agency before the employee or Member separates from service, or with the former employing agency or OPM within 1 year thereafter.
( b ) An application for disability retirement that is filed with OPM, an employing agency or former employing agency by personal delivery is considered filed on the date on which OPM, the employing agency or former employing agency receives it. The date of filing by facsimile is the date of the facsimile. The date of filing by mail is determined by the postmark date; if no legible postmark date appears on the mailing, the application is presumed to have been mailed 5 days before its receipt, excluding days on which OPM, the employing agency or former employing agency, as appropriate, is closed for business. The date of filing by commercial overnight delivery is the date the application is given to the overnight delivery service.
( c ) An application for disability retirement that is filed with OPM or the applicant's former employing agency within 1 year after the employee's separation, and that is incompletely executed or submitted in a letter or other form not prescribed by OPM, is deemed timely filed. OPM will not adjudicate the application or make payment until the application is filed on a form prescribed by OPM.
( d ) OPM may waive the 1-year time limit if the employee or Member is mentally incompetent on the date of separation or within 1 year thereafter, in which case the individual or his or her representative must file the application with the former employing agency or OPM within 1 year after the date the individual regains competency or a court appoints a fiduciary, whichever is earlier.
( e ) An agency may consider the existence of a pending disability retirement application when deciding whether and when to take other personnel actions. An employee's filing for disability retirement does not require the agency to delay any appropriate personnel action.
[63 FR 17049, Apr. 8, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 120
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 120 appear at 72 FR 50039, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 120.221 Fees and expenses that the Lender may collect from a loan applicant or Borrower. Unless otherwise allowed by SBA Loan Program Requirements, the Lender may charge and collect from the applicant or Borrower only the following fees and expenses: ( a ) *Service and packaging fees.* The Lender may charge an applicant reasonable fees (customary for similar Lenders in the geographic area where the loan is being made) for packaging and other services. The Lender must advise the applicant in writing that the applicant is not required to obtain or pay for unwanted services. The applicant is responsible for deciding whether fees are reasonable. SBA may review these fees at any time. Lender must refund any such fee considered unreasonable by SBA.
( b ) *Extraordinary servicing.* Subject to prior written SBA approval, if all or part of a loan will have extraordinary servicing needs, the Lender may charge the applicant a service fee not to exceed 2 percent per year on the outstanding balance of the part requiring special servicing.
( c ) *Out-of-pocket expenses.* The Lender may collect from the applicant necessary out-of-pocket expenses such as filing or recording fees.
( d ) *Late payment fee.* The Lender may charge the Borrower a late payment fee not to exceed 5 percent of the regular loan payment.
( e ) *Legal services.* Lender may charge the Borrower for legal services rendered on an hourly basis.
[61 FR 3235, Jan. 31, 1996, as amended at 82 FR 39503, Aug. 21, 2017; 85 FR 7648, Feb. 10, 2020; 85 FR 80588, Dec. 14, 2020]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50620 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DOUGLAS MILANTONI, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CR-352-6
- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Douglas Milantoni appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a bill of particulars based upon alleged lack of specificity in the indictment, and his motion for new trial based on new evidence of a prior conviction of one of the Government’s witnesses. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a bill of particulars because Milantoni has not shown actual surprise at trial due to a lack of a bill of particulars.No. 96-50620 - 2 - See United States v. Martino , 648 F.2d 367, 383 (5th Cir. 1981). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial because the new evidence of an undisclosed prior conviction of a Government witness was cumulative and there is no reasonable probability that it would have produced a different result. United States v. Sotelo , 97 F.3d 782, 792 (5th Cir. 1996). AFFIRMED.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs December 13, 2005

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EFRAIN MURILLO RAMIREZ

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Greene County

No. 04CR201 James E. Beckner, Judge

No. E2005-00550-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 23, 2006

The defendant, Efrain Murillo Ramirez, who is serving an eight-year Department of Correction

sentence for a Greene County Criminal Court jury conviction of possession of one-half or more

grams of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver, appeals and challenges the trial court’s denial of his

motion to suppress the cocaine seized from his automobile. Because the suppression issue has been

waived by the failure to file a timely motion for new trial, the judgment is affirmed.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3; Judgment of the Criminal Court is Affirmed.

JAMES CURWOOD WITT,JR.,J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JOSEPH M. TIPTON and

DAVID G. HAYES, JJ., joined.

Greg W. Eichelman, District Public Defender; and Ethel Rhodes, Assistant District Public Defender,

for the Appellant, Efrain Murillo Ramirez.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General & Reporter; Jennifer L. Bledsoe, Assistant Attorney General;

C. Berkeley Bell, Jr., District Attorney General; and Cecil Mills, Assistant District Attorney General,

for the Appellee, State of Tennessee.

OPINION

Aggrieved of the police officers’ seizure of cocaine from his parked, unoccupied

automobile following detection by a trained narcotics-sniffing dog, the defendant filed a pretrial

motion to suppress the evidence. After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion. Therefore, the

case proceeded to trial and, ultimately, to a conviction and the imposition of the eight-year sentence.

The defendant’s issues on appeal relate solely to the proprietyof the trial court’s denial of the motion

to suppress. In his brief, the defendant asks for a new trial.

The record before us reflects that the trial court’s judgment of conviction was entered

on January 13, 2005. The denial of the suppression motion was raised in a motion for new trial, but
-2-

the motion was not filed until February 15, 2005. As such, the motion for new trial was late. See

Tenn. R. Crim. P. 33(b) (specifying a period of 30 days for filing a motion for new trial).

[I]n all cases tried by a jury, no issue presented for review shall be

predicated upon error in the admission or exclusion of evidence . . .

or other ground upon which a new trial is sought, unless the same was

specifically stated in a motion for a new trial; otherwise such issues

will be treated as waived. 

Tenn. R. App. P. 3(e). The rule is mandatory; extensions of time for filing the motion for new trial

are not allowed. Tenn. R. Crim. P. 45(b); State v. Martin, 940 S.W.2d 567, 569 (Tenn. 1997). 

Accordingly, the suppression issue is waived, and the judgment of the Criminal Court

is affirmed.

___________________________________ 

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE
Page 3 of 9





Page 9 of 9
Total Flight time recorded: 0.0

Type Reg No From To

Date UAV Returned to Service

Total Time on Airframe

DJI Inspire 1 Maintenance Record

Date Aircraft Mechanic / Technician Discrepancy Maintenance Description
§ 536.310 Exceptions for certain employees in nonforeign areas. ( a ) Notwithstanding §§ 536.304(b)(3) and 536.306(a), an employee who is receiving a retained rate in excess of Executive Schedule level IV on January 1, 2012, consistent with the Non-Foreign Retirement Equity Assurance Act of 2009 (subtitle B of title XIX of Pub. L. 111-84), may continue to receive a retained rate higher than Executive Schedule level IV until— ( 1 ) The retained rate becomes equal to or falls below Executive Schedule level IV; or
( 2 ) The employee ceases to be entitled to pay retention under § 536.308.
( b ) Notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. 5361(1) and § 536.102(b)(2), an employee who is employed on a temporary or term basis is not barred from receiving a retained rate if such employee— ( 1 ) Is receiving a special rate above Executive Schedule level IV on January 1, 2012, and is covered by paragraph (a) of this section; or
( 2 ) Is receiving a special rate incorporating an additional adjustment under section 1915(b)(1) of the Non-Foreign Retirement Equity Assurance Act (subtitle B of title XIX of Pub. L. 111-84) at the time the employee's special rate schedule is reduced or terminated.
[76 FR 68634, Nov. 7, 2011]