alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Conrad F. Hocking, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hechinger Liquidation Trust; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, changes infinancial condition and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and representatives of the Committee: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: May 15, 2006 By: /s/ Conrad F. Hocking         Conrad F. Hocking    Liquidation Trustee
24
### Part C—National Communications System
#### § 630.1002 Definitions.

*Agency* means an “Executive agency,” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105, or a “military department,” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 102. “Agency” does not include the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or any other Executive agency or subunit thereof, as determined by the President, whose principal function is the conduct of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence activities.

*Available paid leave* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Committed relationship* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Domestic partner* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Employee* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Family member* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Leave bank* means a pooled fund of annual leave established by an agency under § 630.1003.

*Leave bank member* means a leave contributor who has contributed, in an open enrollment period (or individual enrollment period, as applicable) of the current leave year, at least the minimum amount of annual leave required by § 630.1004.

*Leave contributor* means an employee who contributes annual leave to a leave bank under § 630.1004.

*Leave recipient* means a leave bank member whose application to receive contributions of annual leave from a leave bank has been approved under § 630.1007.

*Medical emergency* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Paid leave status under subchapter I* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Parent* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Shared leave status* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

*Son or daughter* has the meaning given that term in subpart I of this part.

[59 FR 67129, Dec. 29, 1994, as amended at 75 FR 33496, June 14, 2010]
***Exhibit******32***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Allied Resources, Inc.for the quarterlyperiod endedSeptember30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do        hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:         

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuerat the endof the period covered by this report and resultsof operations of the small business issuerfor the period covered by this                report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: November 13, 2008         

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Thiscertification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuerfor the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of        1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 hasbeen provided to the small business issuerand will be retained by the small business issuerand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.         

31

----
§ 316.702 Excepted positions brought into the competitive service. ( a ) When the Office, or an agency acting under an agreement with the Office, finds that an excepted position has been brought into the competitive service by statute, Executive order, or the revocation of an exception under Civil Service Rule VI (§ 6.6 of this chapter), or is otherwise made subject to competitive examination, the agency may retain the incumbent of the position.
( b ) ( 1 ) When an agency retains an employee under paragraph (a) of this section who was serving in an excepted position under an indefinite appointment or an appointment without time limit, the agency gives the employee a status quo appointment and may convert that employee's appointment to career or career-conditional under § 315.701 of this chapter.
( 2 ) When the agency decides not to effect conversion under § 315.701 of this chapter, or the employee fails to qualify for conversion, the agency, in its discretion, may retain the employee as a status quo employee.
( c ) An employee who was serving under an excepted appointment limited to 1 year or less may be retained as a temporary employee under paragraph (a) of this section until the scheduled expiration date of the employee's excepted appointment. Extension of the employee's temporary appointment beyond that date will be subject to the provisions of § 316.402.
( d ) An employee who was serving under an excepted appointment with a definite time limit longer than 1 year may be retained under a term appointment. The term appointment is subject to all conditions and time limits applicable to term appointments. Service under excepted appointment does not count against the maximum time limit for term appointment in the competitive service.
[44 FR 55133, Sept. 25, 1979, as amended at 60 FR 39101, Aug. 1, 1995; 63 FR 63784, Nov. 17, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1921 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1921

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase from one month to 
three months the quantity of supply of certain prescriptions furnished 
    by the Department of Veterans Affairs to veterans with chronic 
                              conditions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2003

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase from one month to 
three months the quantity of supply of certain prescriptions furnished 
    by the Department of Veterans Affairs to veterans with chronic 
                              conditions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuity of Care for Veterans with 
Chronic Conditions Act''.

SEC. 2. THREE-MONTH SUPPLY OF CERTAIN MEDICATIONS FOR VETERANS WITH 
              CHRONIC CONDITIONS.

    (a) Increase in Amount of Medication Supplied.--Chapter 17 of title 
38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1722A the 
following new section:
``Sec. 1722B. Quantity of certain medications furnished
    ``(a) In furnishing to a veteran by prescription a medication 
described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall furnish not less than 
a 90-day supply of such medication if the physician prescribing the 
medication determines--
            ``(1) that the veteran has a chronic condition for which 
        that medication is medically appropriate; and
            ``(2) that the veteran has not, over a prior course of that 
        medication for a minimum period to be determined by the 
        Secretary by regulation, demonstrated any symptoms of abuse of 
        that medication.
    ``(b) This section applies with respect to medications that are 
controlled substances within the meaning of section 102 of the 
Controlled Substances Act.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1722A the following new item:

``1722B. Quantity of certain medications furnished.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--Section 1722B of title 38, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to prescriptions 
written after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §633. Protection, alteration, reconstruction, relocation, or replacement of structures and facilities; contract standards; reasonable costs

Whenever, during the construction or reconstruction of any navigation, flood control, or related water development project under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the Chief of Engineers determines that any structure or facility owned by an agency of government and utilized in the performance of a governmental function should be protected, altered, reconstructed, relocated, or replaced to meet the requirements of navigation or flood control, or both; or to preserve the safety or integrity of such facility when its safety or usefulness is determined by the Chief of Engineers to be adversely affected or threatened by the project, the Chief of Engineers may, if he deems such action to be in the public interest, enter into a contract providing for (1) the payment from appropriations made for the construction or maintenance of such project, of the reasonable cost of replacing, relocating, or reconstructing such facility to such standard as he deems reasonable but not to exceed the minimum standard of the State or political subdivision for the same type of facility involved, except that if the existing facility exceeds the minimum standard of the State or political subdivision, the Chief of Engineers may provide a facility of comparable standard, or (2) the payment of a lump sum representing the estimated reasonable cost thereof. This section shall not be construed as modifying any existing or future requirement of local cooperation, or as indicating a policy that local interests shall not hereafter be required to assume costs of modifying such facilities. The provisions of this section may be applied to projects hereafter authorized and to those heretofore authorized but not completed as of July 3, 1958, and notwithstanding the navigation servitude vested in the United States, they may be applied to such structures or facilities occupying the beds of navigable waters of the United States.

(Pub. L. 85–500, title I, §111, July 3, 1958, 72 Stat. 303; Pub. L. 89–298, title III, §309, Oct. 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 1094.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1965—Pub. L. 89–298 provided for payment of the reasonable cost of replacing, relocating, or reconstructing the facility to a reasonable standard, not exceeding minimum standard of State or political subdivision for same type of facility involved, except that if the existing facility exceeds the minimum standard of the State or political subdivision, the Chief of Engineers may provide a facility of comparable standard, in provision designated as clause (1), eliminated former provision for payment of reasonable actual cost of the remedial work, and designated existing provisions as clause (2).
# L_2016211EN.01008001.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/80

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 119/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1302]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2014/893/EU of 9 December 2014 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for rinse-off cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2014/893/EU of 9 December 2014 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for rinse-off cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Decision 2014/893/EU repeals Commission Decision 2007/506/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2014/893/EU repeals Commission Decision 2007/506/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 2y (Commission Decision 2007/506/EC) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement is replaced by the following:

‘
  32014 D 0893: Commission Decision 2014/893/EU of 9 December 2014 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel for rinse-off cosmetic products (OJ L 354, 11.12.2014, p. 47).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2014/893/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 354, 11.12.2014, p. 47.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 186, 18.7.2007, p. 36.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 07-2568

_____________
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.; Hunt Martin Materials, LLC, Appellee,

v. The City of Greenwood, Missouri, Appellant. * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: April 15, 2008 Filed: July 10, 2008

________________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. The City of Greenwood, Missouri, filed this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s 1 order entered on June 26, 2007, whic h issued a preliminary injunction against the City of Greenwood, Missouri, prohibiting the City from enforcing its-2- Ordinance No. 2007-02-01-02, a commercial us e streets ordinance passed by the City Council on February 1, 2007. Our careful review satisfies us that the district court did not rely on any clearly errone ous factual findings or erroneous legal conclusions, see PCTV Gold, Inc. v. SpeedNet, LLC , 508 F.3d 1137, 1142-43 (8th Cir. 2007) (stating standard of review and recogni zing the wide latitude afforded district courts in issuing preliminary injunctions ); Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C L Sys., Inc. , 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (listing preliminary injuncti on factors), and we summarily affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Our affirmance does not prejudice either party's ability to contest any decision made by the district court to i ssue or to decline to issue a permanent injunction relating to the same ordinance. The Motion for Emergency Stay of Di strict Court Proceedings filed by the Appellant, City of Greenwood, Missouri, has been considered by the court and is denied.
Mandate to issue forthwith.

______________________________
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Jun 14, 2007 11:04

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

LTR-07-0409

EDO

GOV Bill Ritter

CO-GOV

LOGGING DATE: 06/13/2007

EDO

DEDMRS

DEDR

DEDIA

AO

Energy Policy Act of 2005

Appropriate

RF

06/07/2007

No

Made publicly available in ADAMS via EDO/DPC

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
STATE OF COLORADO

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

136 State Capitol Building

Denver, Colorado 80203

(303) 866 - 2471

(303) 866 - 2003 fax

Bill Rifter, Jr.

Governor

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Kiein,

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 651 (e) of the Energy Policy

Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced

radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections 1 le.(3) and 1 le.(4) of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

The State of Colorado entered into an Agreement in 1968, amended in 1982, with the

Commission under Section 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that

Agreement, as amended, the State licenses byproduct material as defined in Sections 1 le.(1) and

11 e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, the State licenses the naturally occurring and

accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the

program for licensing 1 le.(1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the

licensing program that would impact the previous U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) finding of adequacy. Further, we

intend to continue to license the new byproduct material under this same program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the State of Colorado has a program for licensing

byproduct material, as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section I le. of the Atomic Energy Act

of 1954, as amended, that is adequate to protect thepublic health and safety, and that the State

intends to continue to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct

material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the Transition of

Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material."

Respectfully, 2

Bill Ritte'r,-Jr.,

Governor "