alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 20

- 00095

- CV
Celestino MACIAS , Appellant

v.
Remedios BAUTISTA , Appellee
From the 224th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CI07970 Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding 1

PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2020
VACATED AND REMANDED Appellant Celestino Macias and appe llee Remedios Bautista filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal by agreement

. We grant the motion. In accordance with the motion, we set aside the
trial court’ s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court with
instruc ti ons to vacate the trial court’ s November 14, 2019 Default Final Decree of Divorce

. See

1 The Honorable Cathleen Stryker is the presiding judge of the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. However, the Honorable Aaron Hass, sitting by assignment, signed the order that is the subject of this appeal.04

- 20

- 00095

- CV

- 2

- T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2 ) (B)

. 2 Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.
See id. R. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM

2 The parties also request that this court dismiss th is appeal; however, the appeal is disposed of by this court’ s opinion and ju dgment vacating the trial court’ s judgment and remanding the cause to the trial court. See Priority Towing, Inc. v. State , No. 04

- 16

- 00359

- CV, 2017 WL 361755, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Jan. 25, 2017, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.).
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-037 September 15, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC DISPATCHES STAFF IN PREPARATION FOR HURRICANE IVAN

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff have been dispatched to two nuclear plants and two

emergency response centers in preparation for Hurricane Ivan. 

The NRC has staffed its Incident Response Center to monitor and assist Louisiana’s

River Bend and Waterford nuclear plants, and any other plant that may be impacted by the

hurricane. Personnel have already been dispatched to the plants, to augment NRC’s resident

inspectors permanently assigned to those sites. Staff also have been sent to the Federal

Emergency Management Agency’s Regional Operations Center in Denton, Texas, and to

Louisiana’s Emergency Operations Center in Baton Rouge.

“In accordance with NRC requirements, Louisiana’s nuclear plants have made the

necessary preparations for Hurricane Ivan and we have pre-positioned our people to monitor

events and respond, if needed,” said Bruce S. Mallett, administrator of NRC’s Region IV office

in Arlington, Texas.

At this time, the NRC’s primary focus is on Waterford, 20 miles west of New Orelans. 

The plant declared a Notice of Unusual Event, the lowest of NRC’s emergency classifications,

after the National Weather Service issued a hurricane warning for St. Charles Parish, La., at 4

p.m. on Sept. 14. The plant is operating at full power, but it’s procedures require that it begin

shutting down 12 hours prior to any predicted hurricane force winds on site. The plant has

emergency diesel generators available if needed and has additional diesel generators, normally

used in routine operations, and emergency battery power available should the need arise. 

Waterford is situated some 14 to 17 feet above sea level, and has flood protection above

the predicted storm surge. Key components also are housed in watertight buildings capable of

withstanding hurricane force winds and flooding. 
Mallett said the regional office in Arlington will maintain close contact with the agency’s 

headquarters in Rockville, Md., and its staff at Louisiana’s nuclear plants until the hurricane

threat has passed.

###
### §701d. Compacts between States; consent of Congress

The consent of Congress is given to any two or more States to enter into compacts or agreements in connection with any project or operation authorized by this Act for flood control or the prevention of damage to life or property by reason of floods upon any stream or streams and their tributaries which lie in two or more such States, for the purpose of providing, in such manner and such proportion as may be agreed upon by such States and approved by the Secretary of the Army, funds for construction and maintenance, for the payment of damages, and for the purchase of rights-of-way, lands, and easements in connection with such project or operation. No such compact or agreement shall become effective without the further consent or ratification of Congress, except a compact or agreement which provides that all money to be expended pursuant thereto and all work to be performed thereunder shall be expended and performed by the Department of the Army, with the exception of such reasonable sums as may be reserved by the States entering into the compact or agreement for the purpose of collecting taxes and maintaining the necessary State organizations for carrying out the compact or agreement.

(June 22, 1936, ch. 688, §4, 49 Stat. 1571; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 22, 1936, ch. 688, 49 Stat. 1570, popularly known as the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, which to the extent classified to the Code enacted sections 701a, 701b, 701c, 701d to 701f, and 701h of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables. Portions of section 5 and sections 6 and 7 of act June 22, 1936, enumerating certain projects and operations with regard to flood control, were not classified to the Code.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1967

To suspend temporarily the duty on Allyl Pentaerythritol (APE). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Allyl Pentaerythritol 

(APE).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALLYL PENTAERYTHRITOL (APE). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.01 Allyl Pentaerythritol (CAS No. 

1471–18–7 or 

91648–24–7) 

(provided for in 

subheading 

9902.32.15) ....... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•HR 1967 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017170EN.01010301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/103 |

---

DECISION No 1/2017

of 16 June 2017

of the Joint Committee established under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Canada related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters [2017/1179]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Canada and in particular Articles VII and XI;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment A are added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment 4 of the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Bodies indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of modifying the Attachments to the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters of the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

Signed in Ottawa, on 30 May 2017.

Claude BEAUDOIN

On behalf of Canada

Signed in Brussels, on 16 June 2017.

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

On behalf of the European Union

---

ATTACHMENT A

EU Conformity Assessment Bodies added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies in Attachment 4 of the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment, Information Technology Equipment and Radio Transmitters

| | | | | | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | Element Materials Technology Warwick Ltd | | Rothwell Road | | Warwick | | CV34 5JX | | UNITED KINGDOM | | | | --- | | AT4 Wireless S.A.U [(1)](#ntr1-L_2017170EN.01010401-E0001). | | Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía | | C/Severo Ochoa 2 y 6 | | 29590 Málaga | | SPAIN | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-L_2017170EN.01010401-E0001)  On 3 April 2017, the name of AT4 wireless SAU changed into DEKRA Testing & Certification SAU.

---
### §10351. Rural drug enforcement assistance

(a) Of the total amount appropriated for this section in any fiscal year:

(1) 50 percent shall be allocated to and shared equally among rural States as described in subsection (b); and

(2) 50 percent shall be allocated to the remaining States for use in nonmetropolitan areas within those States, as follows:

(A) $250,000 to each nonrural State; and

(B) of the total funds remaining after the allocation in subparagraph (A), there shall be allocated to each State an amount which bears the same ratio to the amount of remaining funds described as the population of such State bears to the population of all States.

(b) For the purpose of this section, the term "rural State" means a State that has a population density of fifty-two or fewer persons per square mile or a State in which the largest county has fewer than one hundred and fifty thousand people, based on the decennial census of 1990 through fiscal year 1997.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1501, as added Pub. L. 101–647, title VIII, §801(a)(3), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4825; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XVIII, §180101(b), (c), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2045.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796bb of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1501 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2601 and is classified to section 10541 of this title.

Another prior section 1501 of Pub. L. 90–351, title X, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 238, was not classified to the Code.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 103–322, §180101(b), substituted "$250,000" for "$100,000".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–322, §180101(c), inserted before period at end ", based on the decennial census of 1990 through fiscal year 1997".
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Harold Earl Wilson v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas 

formerly known as Banker's Trust Company, as Trustee and Custodian 

for IXIS 2006-HE2

Appellate case number: 01-12-00284-CV

Trial court case number: 0771999A

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County

Appellee’s brief in this case is due on November 25, 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Harvey Brown

 X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 5, 2013
#### In the Matter of Harry Silberglitt et al., Appellants, against Joseph A. McNamara et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant petitioners’ application to annul the determination of the civil service commission. (See *Patterson*v. *Lamb,*329 U. S. 539.) ■
### §331. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(a), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section, R.S. §4233; Feb. 19, 1895, ch. 102, §1, 28 Stat. 672; Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 389, §12, 29 Stat. 690; May 21, 1948, ch. 328, §4, 62 Stat. 253; Aug. 5, 1963, Pub. L. 88–84, §4, 77 Stat. 117, related to manner of giving signals for vessels under way, in fog or bad weather, or at anchor.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 24, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10842 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10843 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10844 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10845 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10846 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10847 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10848 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10849 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10850 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10851 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10852 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10853 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10854 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10855 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10856 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10857 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10858 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10859 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10860 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10861 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10862 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10863 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10864 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10865 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10866 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10867 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10868 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10869 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10870 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10871 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10872 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10873 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10874 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10875 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10876 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10877 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10878 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10879 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10880 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10881 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10882 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10883 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10884 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10885 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10886 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10887 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10888 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10889 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10890 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10891 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10892 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10893 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10894 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10895 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10896 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10897 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10898 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10899 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10900 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10901 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10902 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10903 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10904 1972HeinOnline -- 37 Fed. Reg. 10905 1972
# L_2017161EN.01006501.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/65

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 277/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1066]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1039 of 30 June 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 as regards flight testing (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1039 of 30 June 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 as regards flight testing (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66p (Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 1039: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1039 of 30 June 2015 (OJ L 167, 1.7.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 1039: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1039 of 30 June 2015 (OJ L 167, 1.7.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) 2015/1039 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 167, 1.7.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### The People of the State of New York v. William Cleary.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 1201.112 Jurisdiction of judge. ( a ) After issuing the initial decision, the judge will retain jurisdiction over a case only to the extent necessary to: ( 1 ) Correct the transcript; when one is obtained;
( 2 ) Rule on a request by the appellant for attorney fees, consequential damages, or compensatory damages under subpart H of this part;
( 3 ) Process any petition for enforcement filed under subpart F of this part;
( 4 ) Vacate an initial decision to accept into the record a settlement agreement that is filed prior to the deadline for filing a petition for review, even if the settlement agreement is not received until after the date when the initial decision becomes final under § 1201.113 of this part.
( b ) Nothing is this section affects the time limits prescribed in § 1201.113 regarding the finality of an initial decision or the time allowed for filing a petition for review.
[59 FR 22125, Apr. 29, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 17045, Apr. 9, 1997; 70 FR 30609, May 27, 2005; 77 FR 62368, Oct. 12, 2012; 78 FR 23458, Apr. 19, 2013]
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adherex Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, Rostislav Raykov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert Andrade, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  November
1, 2010




By:
              /s/ Rostislav RaykovRostislav
      RaykovChief
      Executive Officer




Date:  November
1, 2010




By:
              /s/ Robert AndradeRobert
      AndradeChief
      Financial Officer
§ 838.122 State courts' responsibilities. State courts are responsible for— ( a ) Providing due process to the employee or retiree;
( b ) Issuing clear, specific, and express instructions consistent with the statutory provisions authorizing OPM to provide benefits to former spouses or child abuse creditors and the requirements of this part for awarding such benefits;
( c ) Using the terminology defined in this part only when it intends to use the meaning given to that terminology by this part;
( d ) Determining when court orders are invalid; and
( e ) Settling all disputes between the employee or retiree and the former spouse or child abuse creditor.
[57 FR 33574, July 29, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 66638, Dec. 28, 1994]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board

# Time and Date:

Tuesday, November 16, 2004, at 7 p.m. local time. 

# Place:

North West Georgia Trade and Convention Center, Lecture Hall Theater, 2211 Dug Gap Battle Road, Dalton, Georgia, (Telephone No. 1-800-824-7469). 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is convening a community meeting in connection with its investigation of a toxic gas release that occurred on April 12, 2004, at the MFG Chemical Inc. facility located in Dalton, Georgia. 

At the meeting CSB staff will present their preliminary investigative findings to the Board, including a summary of the incident. There will also be a panel discussion consisting of five emergency response organizations. After the staff presentations the Board will allow time for public comment. 

All staff presentations are preliminary and are intended solely to allow the Board to consider in a public forum the issues and factors involved in the incident. Factual analyses, conclusions, or findings contained in the staff presentations should not be considered final. 

This meeting will be open to the public. Please notify CSB if a translator or interpreter is needed, at least five (5) business days prior to the meeting. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Daniel Horowitz, (202) 261-7600. 

Dated: November 1, 2004. 

Christopher W. Warner, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 04-24701 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6350-01-P