alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 351.301 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart is applicable when the work of one or more employees is moved from one competitive area to another as a transfer of function regardless of whether or not the movement is made under authority of a statute, Executive order, reorganization plan, or other authority.
( b ) In a transfer of function, the function must cease in the losing competitive area and continue in an identical form in the gaining competitive area (*i.e.,* in the gaining competitive area, the function continues to be carried out by competing employees rather than by noncompeting employees).
[52 FR 10024, Mar. 30, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 3062, Jan. 13, 1995]
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  American  Bio  Medica
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on November 13, 2006
(the "Report"),  I, Keith E. Palmer,  Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                   (1)   The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act
                         of 1934; and

                   (2)   The   information   contained  in  the  Report   fairly
                         presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
                         condition and results of operations of the Company.




                              /s/ Keith E. Palmer
                              ---------------------------
                              Keith E. Palmer
                              Chief Financial Officer and
                              Executive Vice President

                              November 13, 2006
#### Howard Mulvin, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 30386.)

All concur. (Appeal from a judgment dismissing a claim for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by claimant, and for property damage to claimant’s truck and trailer.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.
§ 451.201 Authority and coverage. ( a ) Under chapter 45 of title 5, United States Code, the President may pay a cash award to and incur necessary expenses for the honorary recognition of an employee who:
( b ) Awards granted under paragraph (a) of this section are subject to the restrictions as specified in § 451.105. ( 1 ) By his/her suggestion, invention or other personal effort contributes to the efficiency, economy, or other improvement of Government operations, or achieves a significant reduction in paperwork; or
( 2 ) Performs an exceptionally meritorious special act or service in the public interest in connection with or related to official employment.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to employees as defined by section 2105 of title 5, United States Code.
( d ) This subpart applies to agencies as defined in section 4501 of title 5, United States Code.
[51 FR 8419, Mar. 11, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 65534, Dec. 15, 1993; 60 FR 43947, Aug. 23, 1995; 67 FR 52596, Aug. 13, 2002]
### §529. Helium lands subject to entry

Lands withdrawn from the public domain which are within (a) Helium Reserve Numbered 1, pursuant to Executive orders of March 21, 1924, and January 28, 1926, and (b) Helium Reserve Numbered 2 pursuant to Executive Order 6184 of June 26, 1933, shall be subject to entry and location under the mining laws of the United States, and to permit and lease under the mineral leasing laws, upon determination by the Secretary of the Interior, based upon available geologic and other information, that there is no reasonable probability that operations pursuant to entry or location of the particular lands under the mining laws, or pursuant to a permit or lease of the particular lands under the Mineral Leasing Act [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.], will result in the extraction or cause loss or waste of the helium-bearing gas in the lands of such reserves: Provided, That the lands shall not become subject to entry, location, permit or lease until such time as the Secretary designates in an order published in the Federal Register: And provided further, That the Secretary may at any time as a condition to continued mineral operations require the entryman, locator, permittee or lessee to take such measures either above or below the surface of the lands as the Secretary deems necessary to prevent loss or waste of the helium-bearing gas.

(Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 730, §9, 68 Stat. 715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Mineral Leasing Act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of this title and Tables.
§ 551.512 Overtime pay entitlement. ( a ) An employee's overtime entitlement under this subpart includes: ( 1 ) The straight time rate of pay times all overtime hours worked; plus
( 2 ) One-half times the employee's hourly regular rate of pay times all overtime hours worked.
( b ) An employee's “straight time rate of pay” is equal to the employee's rate of pay for his or her position (exclusive of any premiums, differentials, or cash awards or bonuses) except for an employee who is authorized annual premium pay under § 550.141 or § 550.151 of this chapter. For an employee who is authorized annual premium pay, straight time rate of pay is equal to basic pay plus annual premium pay divided by the hours for which the basic pay plus annual premium pay are intended.
( c ) An employee has been paid in compliance with the overtime pay provisions of this subpart only if the employee has received pay at a rate at least equal to the employee's straight time rate of pay for all nonovertime hours of work in the workweek.
[45 FR 85665, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 64 FR 69181, Dec. 10, 1999]
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
      statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended December 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
      Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.






/s/
                David SalzmanDavid
                SalzmanChief
                Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
                Corp., Manager of the RegistrantMarch
                28, 2008
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-041 March 3, 2005

NRC PROPOSES REVISED STANDARDS FOR POST-FIRE

 ACTIONS BY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATORS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing revised requirements nuclear power plant

operators must meet in order for their fire protection plans to include manual actions for safely shutting

down the plant after a fire.

The requirements are outlined in a proposed rule that would apply to plants that began

operation prior to Jan. 1, 1979. These plants have the option to adopt the NRC’s approved alternate

methods for using manual actions to safely shut down the reactor after a fire. Compensatory manual

actions by plant personnel had been previously implemented. The proposed rule is intended to provide

consistent standards by which the NRC can ensure manual actions are adequate.

The proposed rule would amend the NRC’s regulations to formally describe where and how

manual actions would be acceptable. The manual action would have to provide protection comparable

to either a fire barrier capable of withstanding a fire for an hour, or to 20 feet of space with no

intervening flammable material. The requirements also require fire detectors and fire suppression

equipment in the fire area. Under the rule change, plant operators will have to provide thorough

evaluations of how their proposed manual actions provide acceptable protection.

For more information on the proposed rule, contact NRC staff members David Diec (telephone

301-415-2834, e-mail dtd@nrc.gov ) or Alexander Klein (telephone 301-415-3477, e-mail

ark1@nrc.gov ).

Comments on the changes will be accepted for 75 days following publication of the proposed

rule in the Federal Register, expected shortly. Comments may be mailed to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 

They may be e-mailed to: SECY@nrc.gov , via the NRC’s rulemaking Web site at

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov , or through the Federal Rulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov . 

Comments may also be faxed to the Secretary at 301-415-1101, or hand-delivered to 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays.

###
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017328EN.01013601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/136 |

---

DECISION No 52/2017 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 24 November 2017

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility [2017/2290]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility. |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorised to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James C. SANFORD

Signed in Washington DC, 15 November 2017

On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA

Signed in Brussels, 24 November 2017

---

ATTACHMENT A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex for Electromagnetic Compatibility

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | --- | | EMITECH Chassieu | | 7, rue Georges Méliès | | 69680 Chassieu | | FRANCE | |

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 0:20-cv-61253-AHS

DOUG LONGHINI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

PNS STORES, INC. d/b/a BIG LOTS,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, DOUG LONGHINI, and Defendants, PNS STORES, INC. d/b/a BIG LOTS,

having entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement that resolves all claims that were or could 

have been brought in this action, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. 

Each party shall bear its respective fees and costs. 

 Respectfully submitted this 29th day of September 2020.

/s/ Anthony J. Perez

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No.: 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

4937 S.W. 74th Court, Unit #3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Facsímile: (305) 553-3031

Primary Email: ajperezlaw@gmail.com;

aquezada@lawgmp.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Laurie A. Thompson 

LAURIE A. THOMPSON

Florida Bar No.: 908339

FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.

515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 2100

West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Telephone: (561) 802-9044

Facsimile: (561) 802-9976

Email: rllorens@shutts.com

Attorney for Defendant

Case 0:20-cv-61253-AHS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 29th, 2020 I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court and counsel of record using CM/ECF.

GARCIA-MENOCAL, & PEREZ, P.L.

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

4937 SW 74th Court, No. 3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@lawgmp.com

Secondary Email: aquezada@lawgmp.com

crodriguez@lawgmp.com

By: /s/ Anthony J. Perez __

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Case 0:20-cv-61253-AHS Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.205 Which areas are nonforeign areas? ( a ) The nonforeign areas are States, commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the United States outside the 48 contiguous United States and any additional areas the Secretary of State designates as being within the scope of Part II of Executive Order 10000, as amended.
( b ) The following areas are nonforeign areas: ( 1 ) State of Alaska;
( 2 ) State of Hawaii;
( 3 ) American Samoa (including the island of Tutuila, the Manua Islands, and all other islands of the Samoa group east of longitude 171 degrees west of Greenwich, together with Swains Island);
( 4 ) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
( 5 ) Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;
( 6 ) Howland, Baker, and Jarvis Islands;
( 7 ) Johnston Atoll;
( 8 ) Kingman Reef;
( 9 ) Midway Atoll;
( 10 ) Navassaa Island;
( 11 ) Palmyra Atoll;
( 12 ) Territory of Guam;
( 13 ) United States Virgin Islands;
( 14 ) Wake Atoll;
( 15 ) Any small guano islands, rocks, or keys that, in pursuance of action taken under the Act of Congress, August 18, 1856, are considered as pertaining to the United States; and
( 16 ) Any other islands outside of the contiguous 48 states to which the U.S. Government reserves claim.
### §869. Repealed. July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIII, §1313 58 Stat. 714

Section, act Apr. 26, 1939, ch. 92, §2, 53 Stat. 620, as affected by 1939 Reorg. Plan No. I, §§201, 205, eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2728, 53 Stat. 1424, provided for medical, dental, etc., treatment of Coast and Geodetic Survey's personnel and their families. See section 253 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Renumbering of Repealing Act

Title XIII, §1313, formerly title VI, §611, of act July 1, 1944, which repealed this section, was renumbered title VII, §711, by act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 958, §5, 60 Stat. 1049; §713, by act Feb. 28, 1948, ch. 83, §9(b), 62 Stat. 47; title VIII, §813, by act July 30, 1956, ch. 779, §3(b), 70 Stat. 721; title IX, §913, by Pub. L. 88–581, §4(b), Sept. 4, 1964, 78 Stat. 919; title X, §1013, by Pub. L. 89–239, §3(b), Oct. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 931; title XI, §1113, by Pub. L. 91–572, §6(b), Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1506; title XII, §1213, by Pub. L. 92–294, §3(b), May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 137; title XIII, §1313, by Pub. L. 93–154, §2(b)(2), Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 604, and was repealed by Pub. L. 93–222, §7(b), Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 936.
Exhibit 23.1



Independent Auditors Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-74501 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements No. 33-91890,
33-18996, 33-18997, 33-65768, 333-79093 and 333-43872 on Form S-8 of Armstrong Holdings, Inc. of our report dated April 16, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Armstrong Venture as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and
the related consolidated statements of income, partners equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Armstrong
Holdings, Inc.



Our report dated April 16, 2004 refers to a change in the
method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP              
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|October 27, 2004
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a listing of the subsidiaries of Anworth Mortgage
Asset Corporation:



|                                           |  |                              
|------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary                                 |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                           | 
|Belvedere Trust Mortgage Corporation       |  | Maryland                     
|                                           | 
|BT Management Holding Corporation          |  | Delaware                     
|                                           | 
|BT Management Company, L.L.C.              |  | Delaware                     
|                                           | 
|Belvedere Trust Finance Corporation        |  | Delaware                     
|                                           | 
|BT Residential Funding Corporation         |  | Delaware                     
|                                           | 
|Belvedere Trust Secured Assets Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|                                           | 
|BellaVista Finance Corporation             |  | Delaware                     
|                                           | 
|BellaVista Funding Corporation             |  | Delaware
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7590

RONALD E. KEIHL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-1161-JFM) Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: September 12, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald E. Keihl, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald E. Keihl appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Keihl v. Conroy , No. CA-99-1161-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 537.109 Employee reimbursements to the Government. ( a ) An employee is indebted to the Federal Government and must reimburse the paying agency for the amount of any student loan repayment benefits received under a service agreement if he or she— ( 1 ) Fails to complete the period of service required in the applicable service agreement (except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section); or
( 2 ) Violates any other condition that specifically triggers a reimbursement requirement under the agreement.
( b ) An agency may not apply paragraph (a) of this section based on an employee's failure to complete the required period of service established under a service agreement if— ( 1 ) The employee is involuntarily separated for reasons other than misconduct, unacceptable performance, or a negative suitability determination under 5 CFR part 731; or
( 2 ) The employee leaves the paying agency voluntarily to enter into the service of any other agency, unless reimbursement to the agency is otherwise required in the service agreement, as provided by § 537.107(e).
( c ) If an agency and an employee mutually agree to modify an existing service agreement to provide additional student loan repayment benefits for additional service (as provided by § 537.107(b)), the modified service agreement may stipulate that, if the employee completes the initial service period but fails to complete the additional service period, he or she is required to reimburse the paying agency only for the amount of any student loan repayment benefits received during the additional service period.
( d ) If an employee fails to reimburse the paying agency for the amount owed under paragraph (a) of this section, a sum equal to the amount outstanding is recoverable from the employee under the agency's regulations for collection by offset from an indebted Government employee under 5 U.S.C. 5514 and 5 CFR part 550, subpart K, or through the appropriate provisions governing Federal debt collection if the individual is no longer a Federal employee.
( e ) An authorized agency official may waive, in whole or in part, a right of recovery of an employee's debt if he or she determines that recovery would be against equity and good conscience or against the public interest. (See 5 U.S.C. 5379(c)(3).)
( f ) Any amount reimbursed by, or recovered from, an employee under this section must be credited to the appropriation account from which the amount involved was originally paid. Any amount so credited must be merged with other sums in such account and must be available for the same purposes and time period, and subject to the same limitations (if any), as the sums with which merged. (See 5 U.S.C. 5379(c)(4).)