alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT  32.1
-------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc.  (the "Company")
on  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William G. Forhan,
President  and  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and

2)   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  Report.


Date:  August  26,  2004


                                   /s/ William G. Forhan
                                   ---------------------
                                   William G. Forhan, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the “ Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 08, 2009

 
| /s/ Mark M. Sieczkarek  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Mark M. Sieczkarek      |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trovagene, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Zaniboni, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| July 3,   2014 | /s/ STEPHEN ZANIBONI |
|---------------------|---------------------------|
|                | Stephen Zaniboni          |
| * *            | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-042                                             October 28, 2005CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416       E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NOTE TO EDITORS:

The regulatory conference between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff and FloridaPower & Light Company officials, originally scheduled for Nov. 8 at 10:00 a.m., has been changed toNov. 16 at 1:00 p.m at the request of FPL.   

The conference, to discuss the risk significance of inspection findings at the Turkey Pointnuclear power plant, is still scheduled to be held in the NRC’s Region II office, located on the 24th

floor of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street SW in Atlanta.

Additional information about the conference is available in NRC News Release II-05-041.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 06-025 February 16, 2006

 

NRC RELEASES RESULTS OF ITS 2005 SAFETY CULTURE AND CLIMATE SURVEY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the public release of its 2005 Safety

Culture and Climate Survey. According to the survey results, the NRC improved in essentially all areas

as compared to the 2002 survey, with the largest gains in communication, mission and strategic

planning, employee engagement, recruiting, developing and retaining staff, and management

leadership. 

According to the survey – with an impressive 70 percent response rate against the 53 percent in

2002 – workload and stress continue to be challenges for employees. Better knowledge transfer from

staff who are retiring and use of the Differing Professional Opinion program are also areas of

opportunity for continued improvement. 

The survey was conducted by the NRC’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) with assistance

from a contractor research firm to gain a better understanding of NRC’s safety culture and climate. In

the experience of the contractor, it is rare that scores improve to this degree between surveys. It is the

third survey conducted; previous surveys were conducted in 1998 and 2002. The OIG’s definition used

for the survey is: Safety culture reflects an organization’s mission, characteristics and policies along

with the beliefs and actions of its individual members, which establish and support nuclear safety and

security as overriding priorities. 

The 2005 report is now available on the NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/insp-gen/2006 . 

“The NRC’s Safety Culture and Climate Survey is a key assessment tool that is an important

contributor to enhancing the welfare of our agency,” said NRC Chairman Nils J. Diaz. “The high level

of participation underscores the importance both top management and NRC employees place in the

survey. We’re very pleased at the gains we’ve seen.”

The agency has taken a number of actions based on the results of the 2002 survey. These were

in the areas of reinforcing the paramount importance of the agency’s safety mission, internal

communications, handling of employee concerns, and management and leadership skills. NRC is

committed to taking additional actions to address the results of the 2005 survey.
Each office and region within the NRC will receive their specific survey scores to analyze and

develop future improvements for their organizations. In addition, a management team will determine

whether there are any agency-wide areas that need additional attention. 

The survey results come just a few months after the NRC was ranked third in best federal

workplaces and the top-ranked regulatory agency in government. The award was based on a survey of 

150,000 employees at 250 federal organizations by the Partnership for Public Service and American

University’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy Implementation.

# # #
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of American Bank Holdings,Inc. (The “Company”), Hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the datehereof:

 

(a)          The Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB of theCompany for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(b)         Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/Phillip C. Bowman                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Phillip C. Bowman                     |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | August 13, 2004                  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to American Bank Holdings, Inc. and will beretained by American Bank Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Thomas Taylor, Respondent, *v.*Alexander Philip, Appellant.

(Argued June 17, 1878 ;

decided November 12, 1878.)

This was an actio u upon a contract. Defendant having been invited by the building committee of a religious society to make tenders for doing the stonecutters’ work upon a church, plaintiff sent to him a letter stating that he understood such an invitation had been extended, and proposing to furnish detailed bills of quantities for three-quarters of one per cent on the amount of the tender, to be paid only by the party who might get the work. Defendant accepted the offer, the bills were furnished ; defendant made a tender, which was rejected by the committee, who accepted the offer of another. Defendant and others thereafter took a sub-contract from the successful bidder for this and other work. Held, that plaintiff was not entitled to recover ; that although defendant had the benefit of the use of the bills of quantities so furnished, yet that this did not answer the proviso of the contract upon wdiich alone he was under express legal obligation to pay ; that when defendant’s tender was rejected and that of a third person accepted, the contract was abandoned, and it was not revived because of the sub-contract.

*Payson Merrill*for appellant.

*A. Bell*Malcomson, *jr.*for respondent.

*589Folger, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except Church, Ck. J. and Miller, J. absent at argument.

Judgment reversed.
### §34. Mill Slough, Oregon

Mill Slough, a tidal tributary of Coos Bay, lying within the limits of the city of Marshfield, State of Oregon, is declared to be not a navigable waterway of the United States, within the meaning of the laws enacted by Congress for the preservation and protection of such waterways, and the consent of Congress is given to the filling in of said slough by the said city of Marshfield.

(Oct. 23, 1913, ch. 33, 38 Stat. 233.)
### §40315. Enforcement and implementation

All departments, agencies, officers, and employees of the United States shall enforce the Compact and cooperate with one another and with all Party States in enforcing the Compact and effectuating its purposes. For the Federal Government, the Attorney General shall make such rules, prescribe such instructions, and take such other actions as may be necessary to carry out the Compact and this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 105–251, title II, §216, Oct. 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 1875.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14615 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 470.313 Project implementation regulations.

Agencies will prepare demonstration project implementing regulations, as appropriate, to replace Government-wide statutes and regulations waived for the project. Demonstration project implementing regulations issued pursuant to an OPM-approved demonstration project must be approved by OPM and shall have full force and authority pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                          Subsidiaries of the Company

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                                        Jurisdiction of Incorporation
------------------------------------------------                            ----------------------------------------
<S>                                                                         <C>
eFunds Corporation                                                          California
Analytic Research Technologies, Inc.                                        Minnesota
eFunds Canada, Inc.                                                         Canada
eFunds Government Services, Inc.                                            Delaware
Chex Systems, Inc.                                                          Minnesota
eFunds Holdings Limited                                                     United Kingdom
eFunds International Limited                                                United Kingdom
Deposit Payment Protection Services, Inc.                                   Delaware
iDLX Corporation                                                            Delaware
iDLX International B.V.                                                     Netherlands
iDLX Holdings N.V.                                                          Netherlands
eFunds IT Solutions Group, Inc.                                             Delaware
eFunds International India Private Limited                                  India
eFunds Overseas, Inc.                                                       Minnesota
</TABLE>
§ 550.806 Interest computations. ( a ) ( 1 ) Interest begins to accrue on the date or dates (usually one or more pay dates) on which the employee would have received the pay, allowances, and differentials if the unjustified or unwarranted personnel action had not occurred.
( 2 ) Interest accrual ends at a time selected by the agency that is no more than 30 days before the date of the back pay interest payment. No interest is payable if a complete back pay payment is made within 30 days after any erroneous withdrawal, reduction, or denial of a payment, and the interest accrual ending date is set to coincide with the interest accrual starting date.
( b ) In computing the amount of interest due under section 5596 of title 5, United States Code, the agency shall reduce the amount of pay, allowances, and differentials due for each date described in paragraph (a) of this section by an amount determined as follows: ( 1 ) Divide the employee's earnings from other employment during the period covered by the corrective action, as described in § 550.805(e)(1) of this part, by the total amount of back pay prior to any deductions;
( 2 ) Multiply the ratio obtained in paragraph (b)(1) of this section by the amount of pay, allowances, and differentials due for each date described in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The agency shall compute interest on the amount of back pay computed under section 5596 of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart before making deductions for erroneous payments, as required by § 550.805(e)(2) of this part.
( d ) The rate or rates used to compute the interest payment shall be the annual percentage rate or rates established by the Secretary of the Treasury as the overpayment rate under section 6621(a)(1) of title 26, United States Code (or its predecessor statute), for the period or periods of time for which interest is payable.
( e ) On each day for which interest accrues, the agency shall compound interest by dividing the applicable interest rate (expressed as a decimal) by 365 (366 in a leap year).
( f ) The agency shall compute the amount of interest due, and shall issue the interest payment within 30 days of the date on which accrual of interest ends.
( g ) To the extent administratively feasible, the agency shall issue payments of back pay and interest simultaneously. If all or part of the payment of back pay is issued on or before the date on which accrual of interest ends and the interest payment is issued after the payment of back pay is issued, the amount of the payment of back pay shall be subtracted from the accrued amount of back pay and interest, effective with the date the payment of back pay was issued. Interest shall continue to accrue on the remaining unpaid amount of back pay (if any) and interest until the date on which accrual of interest ends.
[53 FR 18072, May 20, 1988, and 53 FR 45886, Nov. 15, 1988; 64 FR 69179, Dec. 10, 1999]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW144595] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW144595 for lands in Fremont County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW144595 effective April 1, 2003, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

 

Theresa M. Stevens, 

Acting Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication. 

[FR Doc. 04-24671 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
### §20922. Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website

#### (a) Establishment

There is established the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Website"), which the Attorney General shall maintain.

#### (b) Information to be provided

The Website shall include relevant information for each sex offender and other person listed on a jurisdiction's Internet site. The Website shall allow the public to obtain relevant information for each sex offender by a single query for any given zip code or geographical radius set by the user in a form and with such limitations as may be established by the Attorney General and shall have such other field search capabilities as the Attorney General may provide.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title I, §120, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 597.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website, referred to in text, is located at https://www.nsopw.gov.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16920 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
NRC NEWS                 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                     2443 Warrenville Road                                                             Lisle IL 60532                             Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov  E-mail:  opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-021                                           May 4, 2005CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662  

NRC PROPOSES $60,000 FINE AGAINST EXELON GENERATION CO.FOR RADIATION SAFETY VIOLATION AT LASALLE NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $60,000 fine against ExelonGeneration Co. for violating a radiation safety requirement at its LaSalle Nuclear Power Station.  Theplant, which has two reactors, is located near Seneca, Ill.

An NRC investigation determined that four employees of a contractor working at the LaSalleStation entered a high radiation area without authorization on Jan. 25, 2004.  The Unit 1 reactor wasshut down at the time for refueling and maintenance.

A contractor foreman and three workers were assigned work on a valve in the reactor building,but were unable to locate it.  The foreman led the three workers into a posted high radiation areawithout necessary authorization and training.

NRC investigators determined that the violation was willful in that the foreman and two of theworkers were aware they were not authorized to enter the high radiation area and had not received thebriefing by radiation protection personnel necessary to enter the area.

The workers realized they were in the high radiation area when their radiation monitorsalarmed, and none of them received a significant radiation exposure.  The maximum radiationexposure received was 5 millirem, which is a small fraction of the NRC limit of 5,000 millirem peryear for workers at nuclear facilities.

“These workers showed careless disregard for radiation safety rules and procedures, rules thatare intended to protect them from excessive doses of radiation while working at a nuclear facility,”said James Caldwell, NRC Regional Administrator.  In notifying the utility of the fine, heacknowledged that Exelon had taken extensive corrective actions to improve worker training andcontrol of activities in high radiation areas.

The letter notifying Exelon of the proposed fine will be available from the Region III Office ofPublic Affairs and on the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#reactor

Exelon has until June 2 to pay the fine or to protest it.  If the fine is protested and subsequentlyimposed by the NRC staff, the utility may request a hearing.

###
Salsa dHaiti

(Nami of Company, please pri nu

Aeroport Toussaint Louverture, Port-au-Prince Haiti

(Address)

hereby d gmltes. puruant o section 36103 ofThle 49 of the LS, Code ifomierly section I005ht of the Fcderai A. uEion Act

or 19. a amendedj the pco.on na,ued beto’ as its Aecnt UOfl whom sei’ice of all noticet rnd prove’.’.. 2naJ il1 rdco. decision’..

and requirements of the Department otTransportaiion mv be made for and on behalf of ,aid c..trrier. hereby cancelinç all previou..

desiations ôfa nts mode by it to the DOT,

Name of Agent

Charles F. Donley II cdoniey@ssd.com 1-202-626-6840

(Please Print)

1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,, Suite 500, Washington, D.C. 20004

The Agent so designated has written his name arid also his initials in the following space:

Name (Initials)TN WJTNESS WHEREOF.

Salsa d’Haiti has caused these

(Narrie of Company)

(Name of Company

office at

luvirig its principal

Address

presents to be sgned in its name by

of said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal by

x x

x

‘ ri-4- idr’

. President

Please Print)

X 1 Aori

on hts cay of_i

ATTEST:

x

(Secretary. or other Title)

20i10

--

Salsa cVHaili

(Secresar,, or other officer)

(President)

OST F 1010.5 (1—5)
#### David Bandler, Appellant, v. John R. Hill and Edith H. Hill, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.