alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §701f–2. Funds for specific and authorized projects merged with and accounted for under regular annual appropriation

Funds on and after May 17, 1950, appropriated for a specific and heretofore authorized project for a river, harbor, or flood-control works shall be merged with and be accounted for under the regular annual appropriation title applicable to such item.

(May 17, 1950, ch. 188, title II, §207, 64 Stat. 182.)
### **CHAPTER 301—COMPUTER CRIMES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CRIMES**

Sec.
30101.
State grant program for training and prosecution of computer crimes.
30102.
Development and support of cybersecurity forensic capabilities.
30103.
Local law enforcement grants.
30104.
Improved investigative and forensic resources for enforcement of laws related to intellectual property crimes.
30105.
Additional funding for resources to investigate and prosecute intellectual property crimes and other criminal activity involving computers.
30106.
Annual reports.
30107.
Local law enforcement grants for enforcement of cybercrimes.
30108.
National Resource Center grant.
30109.
National strategy, classification, and reporting on cybercrime.
30110.
Improved investigative and forensic resources for enforcement of laws related to cybercrimes against individuals.
30111.
Training and technical assistance for States.
#### § 297.106 Contact point for Privacy Act matters.

To determine what records the Office maintains in its system of records, requesters must write to the Assistant Director for Workforce Information, Personnel Systems and Oversight Group, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415. Using the Office's response, requesters can contact the particular system manager indicated in the Office's notices of its systems published in the Federal Register for further assistance in determining if the Office maintains information pertaining to them.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                  (After Issuance of Stock)

                          Filed by:

                            Charger Ventures Inc.
                             Name of Corporation

We the undersigned      President       and            Secretary        of
                    President or Vice                 Secretary or
                        President                 Assistant Secretary

   Charger Ventures Inc.      do hereby certify:
    Name of Corporation

That the Board of Directors of said corporation at a meeting duly convened,
held on the

27th  day of  March, 2000     adopted  a  resolution  to  amend  the  original
                              articles as

follows:

Article   1  is hereby amended to read as follows:

The name of the corporation is Global Industrial Services Inc.

The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to vote on an
amendment  to  the  Articles  of Incorporation is  4,020,000;  that  the  said
change(s) and amendment have been consented to and approved by a majority vote
of  the  stockholders  holding at least a majority  of  each  class  of  stock
outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.


                                   /s/ Terry Kirby
                                   President or Vice President

                                   /s/ Terry Kirby
                                   Secretary or Assistant Secretary
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00192

- CR

R ONDAL D URAY J OHNSON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1276234W)

July 25, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
### §728. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8512(a)(3), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4759

Section, R.S. §4662, related to sufficiency of cession by State and service of State process in lands ceded.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4662 derived from act Mar. 2, 1795, ch. 40, §§1, 2, 1 Stat. 426.
#### § 191.142 Procedure.

Other provisions of this part shall apply to claims for drawback filed under this subpart insofar as applicable to and not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart.
#### John M. Westerfield, appellant, v. Lardner Howell et al., appellees.

Filed February 15, 1911.

No. 16,294.

Quieting Title: Void Foreclosure Proceedings: Purchase Subject to Mortgage. If a valid real estate mortgage has been foreclosed, even though the proceedings are void, one who purchased the equity of redemption subject to the mortgage will not be heard to question the title acquired by reason of those proceedings, unless he pays or tenders the amount of the mortgage debt and interest.

Appeal from the district court for Lincoln county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Ellery H. Westerfield■,*for appellant.

*A. Muldoon, contra.*

Root, J.

This is an action to quiet in the plaintiff title to a tract of land. The defendants prevailed, and the plaintiff appeals.

In 1892 the plaintiff purchased the land in controversy subject to a mortgage which was subsequently foreclosed. The defendants purchased the land at the sheriff’s sale. The plaintiff asserts that in the foreclosure proceedings the court did not acquire jurisdiction over the real estate, *464and that the decree and the sheriff’s deed are void. The plaintiff does not contend that the mortgage was invalid, paid or satisfied at the time those proceedings were instituted, or that the mortgage debt has been paid, but relies upon section 61a, ch. 73, Comp. St. 1909, which provides for quieting title to real estate as against unenforceable liens. The plaintiff does not confine his petition to the mortgage lien, but assails the foreclosure proceedings and the sheriff’s deed. He has not paid, nor does he offer to pay, the mortgage debt. The district court therefore was right in dismissing the petition, *Loney v. Courtnay,*24 Neb. 580; *Stull v. Masilonka,*74 Neb. 309; *Barney v. Chamberlain,*85 Neb. 785.

The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the
Annual Report of Bruker Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William J. Knight, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 16,
  2009
  By:
  /s/ WILLIAM J. KNIGHTWilliam J. Knight
  Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial
  and Accounting Officer)  1
Slip-Op 05-58 United States Court of International Trade
NORSK HYDRO CANADA INC.,

Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant, and U.S. MAGNESIUM, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: Pogue, Judge Court No. 03-00828

ORDER On October 24, 2004, this Court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s action. Norsk Hydro Can ada , Inc. v. United States , 350 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (2004). In that opinion, the Court heldthat it had subject matter jurisdiction over this matter. The C ourt f urther held that “[the Department of] Commerce has the authorityunder [19 U.S.C.] § 1671(a) to ensure that the amount of the countervailing duty imposed is equal to the amount of the net countervailable subsidy.” Norsk Hydro , 350 F. Supp. 2d at 1186. Moreover, 19 U.S. C. §1675a(a)(1)(A) requires that, in an administrative review, the Department of Commerce is to “review and determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy.” Following the Court’s opinion, Plaintiff filed a Moti on f or Judgment on the Agency Record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2. Plaintiff’s motion, and the responses thereto, are now before the Court. However, neither the motion nor the responses thereto have raisedany new legal claims other than those resolved by the Court’s prior opinion.
The Department of Commerce, in the proceedings below, determinedthat it could not offset future duties by the amount Plaintiff overpaid in the past. Therefore, Commerce did not make an evidentiary finding regarding the merits of Plaintiff’s case to “determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy.” Consequently, this Court has no evidence on the record to review.Ct. No. 03-00828 Page 2

Accordingly, the Court having resolved the meaning of the relevant statutoryprovisions in Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States , 350 F. Supp. 2d 1172 (2004), it is hereby
ORDERED that the Department of Commerce’s final results in the administrative review of Pure Magnesiu m an d Alloy Magnesium from Canada , 68 Fed. R eg. 53 962(Dep’t Commerce Sept. 15, 2003) (final results of countervailing duty administrative review)are remanded to the Department of Commerce; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon remand, and consistent with this Court’s opinion and order, the Depa rtment of Commerce shall “review and determine the amount of any net countervailable subsidy,” and specifically shall “ensure th at the amount of the countervailing duty imposed is equal to the amount of the net countervailable subsidy;”
IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that the Department of Commerce shall determine the amount of any duty remaining to be assessed; The Department of Commerce shall have until June 17, 2005 to submit its remand determination. The parties shall have until July 1, 2005 to submit comments on the remand determination. Rebuttal comments shall be submitted by July 15, 2005.

/s/ Donald C. Pogue, Judge Dated: May 17, 2005 New York, New York
#### In the Matter of The People of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel Singer, Respondent, against Albert F. Lannon, Appellant.

Order affirmed in accordance with the decision of this court in *Matter of People ex rel. Singer*V. *Charney (ante,*p. 919), decided herewith. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
§ 3301.103 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) *Prior approval requirement.* Before engaging in any outside employment, whether or not for compensation, an employee, other than a special Government employee, must obtain written approval of his immediate supervisor and the Counselor. Requests for approval shall include the name of the person, group or organization for whom the work is to be performed; the type of work to be performed; and the proposed hours of work and approximate dates of employment.
( b ) *Standard for approval.* Approval shall be granted unless there is a determination that the outside employment is expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
( c ) *Definition of employment.* For purposes of this section, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the employee. It includes but is not limited to personal services as an officer, director, trustee, general partner, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, employee, advisor, or teacher. It does not include participating in the activities of a nonprofit, charitable, religious, public service or civic organization, unless such activities involve the provision of professional services or are for compensation.
### §553. Freight statistics

In the collection of statistics relating to traffic, the Corps of Engineers is directed to adopt a uniform system of classification for freight, and upon rivers or inland waterways to collate ton-mileage statistics as far as practicable.

(July 25, 1912, ch. 253, §1, 37 Stat. 223.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from part of section 1 of act July 25, 1912, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1912".
IB 

House Calendar No. 109

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1702

[Report No. 108–315] 

To designate the Federal building which is to be constructed at 799 First 

Avenue in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown United 

States Mission to the United Nations Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2003

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

OCTOBER 15, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To designate the Federal building which is to be constructed 

at 799 First Avenue in New York, New York, as the 

‘‘Ronald H. Brown United States Mission to the United 

Nations Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1702 RH 

1 SECTION 1. RONALD H. BROWN UNITED STATES MISSION 

2 TO THE UNITED NATIONS BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building at 799 

4 First Avenue in New York, New York (construction of 

5 which is expected to begin in 2005) shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown United States Mis7 sion to the United Nations Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

11 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Ronald H. 

12 Brown United States Mission to the United Nations 

13 Building. 

House Calendar No. 109

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1702

[Report No. 108–315] 

A BILL

To designate the Federal building which is to be 

constructed at 799 First Avenue in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Ronald H. Brown United States Mission to the United Nations Building’’. 

OCTOBER 15, 2003

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### § 550.1409 Inapplicability of premium pay and aggregate pay caps.

Accrued compensatory time off under this subpart is not considered in applying the premium pay limitations established under 5 U.S.C. 5547 and 5 CFR 550.105 through 550.107 or the aggregate limitation on pay established under 5 U.S.C. 5307 and 5 CFR part 530, subpart B.
# L_2016093EN.01003201.xml

| 7.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 19/2015

of 25 February 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/507]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 866/2014 of 8 August 2014 amending Annexes III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1), as corrected by OJ L 254, 28.8.2014, p. 39, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 866/2014 of 8 August 2014 amending Annexes III, V and VI to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1), as corrected by OJ L 254, 28.8.2014, p. 39, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0866: Commission Regulation (EU) No 866/2014 of 8 August 2014 (OJ L 238, 9.8.2014, p. 3), as corrected by OJ L 254, 28.8.2014, p. 39.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 866/2014, as corrected by OJ L 254, 28.8.2014, p. 39, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 February 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 238, 9.8.2014, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 551.422 Time spent traveling. ( a ) Time spent traveling shall be considered hours of work if: ( 1 ) An employee is required to travel during regular working hours;
( 2 ) An employee is required to drive a vehicle or perform other work while traveling;
( 3 ) An employee is required to travel as a passenger on a one-day assignment away from the official duty station; or
( 4 ) An employee is required to travel as a passenger on an overnight assignment away from the official duty station during hours on nonworkdays that correspond to the employee's regular working hours.
( b ) An employee who travels from home before the regular workday begins and returns home at the end of the workday is engaged in normal “home to work” travel; such travel is not hours of work. When an employee travels directly from home to a temporary duty location outside the limits of his or her official duty station, the time the employee would have spent in normal home to work travel shall be deducted from hours of work as specified in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section.
( c ) An employee who is offered one mode of transportation, and who is permitted to use an alternative mode of transportation, or an employee who travels at a time other than that selected by the agency, shall be credited with the lesser of: ( 1 ) The actual travel time which is hours of work under this section; or
( 2 ) The estimated travel time which would have been considered hours of work under this section had the employee used the mode of transportation offered by the agency, or traveled at the time selected by the agency.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an agency may prescribe a mileage radius of not greater than 50 miles to determine whether an employee's travel is within or outside the limits of the employee's official duty station for determining entitlement to overtime pay for travel under this part. However, an agency's definition of an employee's official duty station for determining overtime pay for travel may not be smaller than the definition of “official station and post of duty” under the Federal Travel Regulation issued by the General Services Administration (41 CFR 300-3.1).
[45 FR 85664, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 66635, Dec. 28, 1994; 72 FR 12036, Mar. 15, 2007]
### §3708. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) NOAA

There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to carry out the purposes of this chapter—

(1) $20,500,000 for fiscal year 2023;

(2) $22,000,000 for fiscal year 2024;

(3) $24,000,000 for fiscal year 2025;

(4) $26,000,000 for fiscal year 2026; and

(5) $28,000,000 for fiscal year 2027.

#### (b) NSF

There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Science Foundation to carry out the purposes of this chapter, $20,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12409, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1441; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title VI, §10649, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1681.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–167, §10649(1), substituted pars. (1) to (5) for former pars. (1) to (4) which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2009 to 2012.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–167, §10649(2), substituted "chapter, $20,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2023 through 2027." for "chapter—" and pars. (1) to (4) which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2009 to 2012.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-033 March 3, 2006

NRC ISSUES ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR NATION’S NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued annual assessment letters to the nation’s 103

operating commercial nuclear power plants. All the plants continue to operate safely.

“These annual assessments give the public an overview of how each plant has performed over

the past year,” said Michael Case, Director of the Division of Inspection and Regional Support in the

NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “Later this spring, the NRC will meet with the operators

of every plant in nearby locations to publicly discuss plant performance.”

A separate announcement will be issued for each plant meeting. In addition to the annual

assessment letters, plants also receive an NRC inspection plan for the coming year. Updated

information on plant performance is posted to the NRC web site every quarter. The plants also receive

a mid-cycle assessment letter during the year; the next mid-cycle letters will be issued in September.

The assessment letters sent to each licensee are available on the NRC Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html and through ADAMS, the Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System. Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC

Public Document Room by calling (301) 415-4737 or (800) 397-4209.

###