alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§427 to 430. Repealed. July 31, 1945, ch. 334, §5, 59 Stat. 508

Section 427, act June 26, 1936, ch. 849, §1, 49 Stat. 1982, related to improvement and protection of beaches and defined "beach".

Section 428, act June 26, 1936, ch. 849, §2, 49 Stat. 1982, related to investigations by Beach Erosion Board and duties of Board. See section 426–1 of this title.

Section 429, act June 26, 1936, ch. 849, §3, 49 Stat. 1983, related to investigative reports by Beach Erosion Board. See section 426–1 of this title.

Section 430, act June 26, 1936, ch. 849, §4, 49 Stat. 1983, related to payment of expenses incident to investigations by Board. See section 426–1 of this title.
§ 185.112 Notice of hearing. ( a ) When the ALJ receives the complaint and answer, the ALJ shall promptly serve a notice of hearing upon the defendant in the manner prescribed by § 185.108. At the same time, the ALJ shall send a copy of such notice to the reviewing official or his or her designee.
( b ) Such notice shall include: ( 1 ) The tentative time and place, and the nature of the hearing;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law to be asserted;
( 4 ) A description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing;
( 5 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the representative of the Government and of the defendant, if any; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as the ALJ deems appropriate.
§ 362.302 Eligibility. ( a ) A Recent Graduate is an individual who obtained a qualifying associate's, bachelor's, master's, professional, doctorate, vocational, technical degree or a certificate from a qualifying educational institution or completed a qualifying career or technical education program within the previous 2 years or other applicable period provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, an individual may apply for a position in the Recent Graduates Program only if the individual's application is received not later than 2 years after the date the individual completed all requirements of an academic course of study leading to a qualifying associate, bachelor's, master's, professional, doctorate, vocational, or technical degree or certificate from a qualifying educational institution or completed a qualifying career or technical education program.
( 2 ) A veteran, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2108, who, due to a military service obligation, was precluded from applying to the Recent Graduates Program during any portion of the 2-year eligibility period described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall have a full 2-year period of eligibility upon his or her release or discharge from active duty. In no event, however, may the individual's eligibility period extend beyond 6 years from the date on which the individual completed the requirements of an academic course of study or a qualifying career or technical education program.
[89 FR 25773, Apr. 12, 2024]
#### § 295.209 Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time a response is required.

If a response to a demand or request is required before the General Counsel can make the determination referred to in Sec.295.206, the General Counsel, when necessary, will provide the court or other competent authority with a copy of this part, inform the court or other competent authority that the demand or request is being reviewed, and seek a stay of the demand or request pending a final determination.
No: II-07-046 September 19, 2007 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

TELEPHONE BRIDGE LINE ESTABLISHED FOR PUBLIC MEETING BETWEEN 

NRC AND FARLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

EDITORS/NEWS EDITORS

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have established a telephone bridge line for 

news media representatives or interested citizens to call in and listen to a public meeting between 

the NRC and Farley nuclear power plant officials on September 20 at 5:30 p.m. (CDT). 

 The NRC will conduct a public meeting with Farley officials in the County 

Commissioners Chambers on the Third Floor of the Houston County Administration Building at 

462 Oats Street at that time. (See News Release II-07-045 dated Sept. 17) 

 Ten lines are available for this purpose. Media representatives from outside the Dothan 

area will be given priority. 

 NRC officials will discuss with Farley officials the preliminary results of a five-member 

inspection team’s review of component cooling water system breaker failures. 

 Please call one of the above CONTACT numbers if you wish to participate. You will be 

given a call number and a pass code at that time. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC home page at www.nrc.gov also 

offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC’s 

Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
§ 293.105 Restrictions on collection and use of information. ( a ) First Amendment. Personnel records describing how individuals exercise rights guaranteed by the First Amendment are prohibited unless expressly authorized by statute, or by the individual concerned, or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity. These rights include, but are not limited to, free exercise of religious and political beliefs, freedom of speech and the press, and freedom to assemble and to petition the government.
( b ) Social Security Number. ( 1 ) Agencies may not require individuals to disclose their Social Security Number unless disclosure would be required; ( i ) Under Federal statute; or
( ii ) Under any statute, Executive order, or regulation that authorizes any Federal, State, or local agency maintaining a system of records that was in existence and operating prior to January 1, 1975, to request the Social Security Number as a necessary means of verifying the identity of an individual.
( 2 ) Individuals asked to voluntarily (circumstances not covered by paragraph (b)(1) of this section) provide their Social Security Number shall suffer no penalty or denial of benefits for refusing to provide it.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7707
NATHANIEL SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusC. E. THOMPSON, Warden; FAYE NEWTON, Correctional Officer; CAPTAIN SPEED; LIEUTENANT RICE; SERGEANT HICKS; SERGEANT LINDSEY; SERGEANT BOYD; D. GEORGE; L. SMITH, Sergeant; TERRY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-94-595) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 25, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scott v. Thompson , No. CA-94-595 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Health Level Seven, Inc. (“HL7”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Health Level Seven, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI. The nature and scope of HL7's standards development activities are: To provide a comprehensive framework and related standards for the exchange, integration, sharing, and retrieval of electronic health information that supports clinical practice and the management, delivery and evaluation of health services. Specifically, to create flexible, cost effective standards, guidelines, and methodologies to enable healthcare information system interoperability and sharing of electronic health records.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24568  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60057 Conference Calendar

TROY LEE LOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARCUS GORDON, Circuit Court Judge; GERALD GRIER, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:01-CV-885-WS

-------------------- June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Troy Lee Lott (Mississippi prisoner #K7065) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim. He argues that Gerald Grier, an investigator for Scott County, Mississippi, illegally confiscated his money from his income-tax refunds and prevented him from using that money to hire an attorney to represent him during his state criminal proceedings.No. 02-60057 -2- Lott also argues that Marcus Gordon, a Scott County circuit court judge, violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel by denying him access to his own money to hire an attorney, by denying a motion for continuance to allow additional time for finding an attorney, by giving him only one working day to look for an attorney, and by turning his money over to his appointed public defender to cover some of the costs of representation. As the district court correctly noted, Lott’s allegations concerning the deprivation of his money fail to establish a due-process violation because Mississippi law provides adequate post-deprivation remedies. See Nickens v. Melton , 38 F.3d 183, 185 (5th Cir. 1994). Although Lott states that Judge Gordon deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, the district court properly pointed out that Judge Gordon was entitled to absolute judicial immunity with respect those claims.

See Krueger v. Reimer , 66 F.3d 75, 77 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court did not err in dismissing Lott’s complaint for failure to state a claim. See Bass v. Parkwood Hosp. , 180 F.3d 234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999). Lott’s appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The dismissal of Lott’s complaint for failure to state a claim and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Lott that once he accumulatesNo. 02-60057 -3- three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; § 1915(g) WARNING ISSUED.
§ 451.203 Responsibilities of the Office of Personnel Management. ( a ) The Office of Personnel Management, in accordance with Executive Order 10717, as amended, shall review agency recommendations for the President's Award for Distinguished Federal Civilian Service and recommend to the President which career employees should receive this award.
( b ) Under Executive Order 11228, section 2, the Office of Personnel Management has the authority to determine the activity or activities primarily benefiting from any suggestion, invention, or other contribution which forms the basis for a Presidential award under 5 U.S.C. 4504.
[51 FR 8419, Mar. 11, 1986, as amended at 58 FR 65534, Dec. 15, 1993; 67 FR 52596, Aug. 13, 2002]
Page 1 of 3

source, whichever is later. New sources are defined as
sources that began construction on or after June 4, 2010, or

commenced reconstruction or modification after [ INSERT THE DATE

6 MONTHS AFTER PUBLICATION OF THE FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL

REGISTER ].

Costs and Benefits
The final rule affects 106 existing sources located at 76
facilities. The EPA projects an additional incinerator and five
additional small remote incinerators to be subject to this rule
over the next 5 years. This final rule applies to facilities in
multiple sectors of our economy including small entities. Table
1 of this preamble summarizes the costs and benefits associated
with this final rule. Note, these are the costs and benefits of
the final 2011 CISWI rule as amended by today’s fi nal rule and
replace the costs and benefits presented in the March 2011 final

rule. For comparison, the 2011 final rule, at a 7 percent
discount rate, had costs of $ 218 million and monetized benefits
of $3 20 to $7 90 million (2008 dollars). ( However, becaus e the
February 2011 RIA did not incorporate the final engineering

costs and emission reductions estimates , it reported costs of
$280 million and monetized benefits of $310 to $750 million

(2008 dollars) )

. [T1] A more detailed discussion of the costs andPage 2 of 3

bene fits of this final rule is provided in section II.G of this
preamble.
Table 1. Summary of the Monetized Benefits, Social Costs and Net Benefits for the Final CISWI NSPS and EG In 2015 (Millions of 2008$) 1 3 percent Discount Rate 7 percent Discount Rate
Total Monetized Benefits 2 $420 to $1,000 $380 to $930

Total Social Costs 3 $258 $258

Net Benefits $160 to $770 $120 to $670

Non

- monetized Benefits Health effects from exposure to HAP 780 tons of HCl, 2.5 tons of lead, 1.8 tons of Cd, 680 pounds of Hg, and 58 grams of dioxins/furans) Health effects from exposure to criteria pollutants (20,000 tons of CO

, 6,300 tons of SO 2 , 5,400 tons of NO 2 , and secondary formation of ozone) Ecosystem effects Visibility impairment

1 All estimates are for the implementation year (2015) and are rounded to two significant figures. These results reflect the lowest cost disposal assumption. 2 The total monetized benefits reflect the human health benefits associated with reducing exposure to PM 2.5 through reductions of
PM 2.5 precursors such as directly emitted particles, SO 2 , and NO x . It is important to note that the monetized benefits include many but not all health effects associated with PM 2.5 exposure. Monetized benefits are shown as a range from Pope, et al. (20 02) to Laden, et al. (2006). These models assume that all fine particles, regardless of their chemical composition, are equally potent in causing premature mortality because the scientific evidence is not yet sufficient to allow differentiation of effect e stimates by particle type.

3 The methodology used to estimate social costs for 1 year in the multimarket model using surplus changes results in the same social costs for both discount rates.Page 3 of 3
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-113 September 19, 2006

NRC OFFERS NEW SERVICE FOR E-MAIL NOTIFICATION

In an effort to expand communications with the public, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

has initiated a free automated “list serve” program to provide information and documents when they

are issued. Those who wish to subscribe should go to the SUBSCRIBE link on the NRC website:

http://www.nrc.gov .

Interested members of the public may subscribe to electronic notices of the latest news releases,

speeches by NRC officials, public meetings on the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant in New York,

generic communications from the NRC to specific classes of licensees such as power reactors, and

notices on meetings, upgrades and issues concerning NRC’s Agencywide Document Access and

Management System (ADAMS). E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when the information is

posted to NRC’s web site.

Other information may be available through this service in the future as part of the agency’s

continuing efforts to better serve the public.

###
### §§729, 730. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section 729, acts June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §9, 36 Stat. 538; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to purchase by Commandant of sites for lighthouses. See sections 501(f) and 902 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

Section 730, acts Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 168, 37 Stat. 1018; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; Oct. 22, 1913, ch. 32, 38 Stat. 225, related to purchase of additional land for lighthouses and depots. See section 501(f) of Title 14.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 19, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #15696 and #15697; North Carolina Disaster Number 
NC-00099]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of North Carolina

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 8.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4393-DR), dated 
09/14/2018.
    Incident: Hurricane Florence.
    Incident Period: 09/07/2018 through 09/29/2018.

DATES: Issued on 12/13/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/19/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/14/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated 09/14/2018, is 
hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for 
physical damages as a result of this disaster to 12/19/2018.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-27552 Filed 12-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64823-64824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL19-14-000]


Cottonwood Energy Company LP; Notice of Institution of Section 
206 Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On December 12, 2018, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL19-14-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into whether 
Cottonwood Energy Company LP's Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 may be unjust 
and unreasonable. Cottonwood Energy Company LP, 165 FERC 61,228 (2018).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL19-14-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.

[[Page 64824]]

    Any interested person desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL19-14-
000 must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as 
appropriate, with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.214, within 21 
days of the date of issuance of the order.

    Dated: December 12, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27316 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### **CHAPTER 509—CONFIDENTIALITY OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEER SUPPORT COUNSELING**

Sec.
50901.
Confidentiality of peer support communications.
50902.
Best practices and support.