alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
B.C.D. 02-31

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Kansas Southern Railway

APR 1 5 2002

This is a determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

the Kansas Southern Railway (KSR) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement

Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seep) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance 

Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seg.) (RUIA).

According to a letter from Mr. Cecil R. Newman, a CPA employed by the KSR, the

KSR began operations on December 11, 2000. KSR operates over 43 miles oftrack

between Attica and Sun City, Kansas. KSR interchanges with the Burlington 

Northern Santa Fe (BNSF), a carrier subject to the Acts (BA No. 2796). The KSR

operates three freight trains weekly over the entire line. Mr. Newman reported that

no Surface Transportation Board (STB) permission was requested, since the KSR 

operates as a subcontractor of the V & S Railway Company.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Surface

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV of title 49, United

States Code;

Section 1 of the RUIA contains essentially the same definition, as does section 3231

of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act.

The evidence ofrecord establishes that KSR is a rail carrier operating in interstate

commerce, since it interchanges with an interstate railroad, the BNSF. Accordingly,

it is determined that KSR became an employer within the meaning ofsection

1 (a)( 1 )(i) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act and the corresponding provision of

BA# 2799
-2-

Kansas Southern Railway

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective December 11, 2000, the date

it commenced operations.

Jerome F. Kever
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 08-4598

_____________ 

### BLANCA BARRALES PAREJA,

Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent

On Petition for Review from an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board No. A098-632-579) Immigration Judge: Honorable Eugene Pugliese Argued June 23, 2010 Before: SMITH, FISHER and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges

. (Filed: July 29, 2010)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Slip Opinion filed in this case on July 29, 2010, be amended as follows: On page 2 add the firm name of Cyrus D. Mehta & Associates , to the address of Attorney David A. Isaacson, Esquire, under the list of Counsel for Petitioner.For the Court:

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk Dated: July 30, 2010 PDB/cc: David A. Isaacson, Esq. Linda Y. Cheng, Esq. W. Daniel Shieh, Esq.
### **CHAPTERS 2501 THROUGH 2599—RESERVED**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(b)(21), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2839, substituted "CHAPTERS 2501 THROUGH 2599—RESERVED" for "CHAPTER 2601—[RESERVED]".
### **PART II—PATENTABILITY OF INVENTIONS AND GRANT OF PATENTS**

Chap.
Sec.
10.
Patentability of Inventions
100
11.
Application for Patent
111
12.
Examination of Application
131
13.
Review of Patent and Trademark Office Decisions
141
14.
Issue of Patent
151
15.
Plant Patents
161
16.
Designs
171
17.
Secrecy of Certain Inventions and Filing Applications Abroad  1
181

18.
Patent Rights in Inventions Made with Federal Assistance
200

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(a)(6), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1904, substituted "Examination of Application" for "Examination of Applications" in heading of chapter 12.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–256, title I, §101(6), Sept. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 816, added item for chapter 18.

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949, substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office" in heading of chapter 13.

1  So in original. Does not conform to chapter heading.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-15-0036

SAT Date: 10/28/2014

Print Date: 4/1/2015

Related cases: Yes

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 12

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORR-E,S,MM,L; SENS-S; KIDNEY; LIVER; ONCO 

(UNCERT); DEVEL (UNCERT); AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-15-0036

FATE: 

Solid with MP = 125 °C (M)

log Kow = 2.62 (E) 

S = 300 mg/L at 25 °C (M)

VP = 4.0E-5 torr at 25 °C (E)

BP = 330 °C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 1.89 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.40 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 0 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg ≥ mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin as the neat material 

moderate absorption through the skin if in solution, good absorption from the lung and GI tract

(pchem); PMN substance is a potential arylating agent. Concern for irritation and possible 

corrosion to all tissues; kidney and liver toxicity; dermal sensitization; and uncertain concern for 

oncogenicity based on data for analogues. Uncertain concern for developmental toxicity based 

on potential as an arylating agent.

 Test Data: rat 13-week dietary study LOEL = 500 mg/kg, 

irritation of GI mucosal tissue

dog 13-week dietary study NOEL = 0.75%, irritation of GI mucosal tissue at 3%

dermal sensitizer in guinea pigs

mouse 2-year dietary NOEL = 300 mg/kg, kidney toxicity and liver tumors at 900 

mg/kg

severe eye irritation in rabbits

NTP TR-23 (Picloram): Equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in female rats, negative in male 

rats and male and female mice

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 15.4 Halopyrdines-acid SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 11.1 Halopyrdines-acid SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 29.3 Neutral organic SAR

fish _ chronic value 1.3 Halopyrdines-acid SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.3 Halopyrdines-acid SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

2.9 Neutral organic SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Halopyrdines-acid, 

Pyridine-alpha-acids and Neutral Organics; SAR chemical class = Pyridines; MW 226.45;

Solid with MP of 125 at 20 deg C; log Kow = 2.96; S = 0.3 g/L at 20 C (P); pH7; effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness 

<150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

30

SARs Pyridine-alpha-acids and 

Neutral Organics

SAR Class Pyridine-alpha-acids and 

Neutral Organics

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair:
---

EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Susanne Robertson, Chief Financial Officer* of Teryl
Resources Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources Corp. for
the year ended May 31, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, BC Canada |                           
|------------------- | --------------------------
|                    | by:  /s/ Susanne Robertson
|July 31, 2007       |                           
|                    | Susanne Robertson         
|                    | Chief Financial Officer*  
|                    | (*as of May 31, 2001)     



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained by
Teryl Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
# L_2017008EN.01000601.xml

| 12.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/6

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 178/2015

of 10 July 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/18]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/490 of 23 March 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95 as regards the adjustment of the fees of the European Medicines Agency to the inflation rate (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/490 of 23 March 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95 as regards the adjustment of the fees of the European Medicines Agency to the inflation rate (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 15h (Council Regulation (EC) No 297/95) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 0490: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/490 of 23 March 2015 (OJ L 78, 24.3.2015, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 0490: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/490 of 23 March 2015 (OJ L 78, 24.3.2015, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/490 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 July 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 78, 24.3.2015, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §2. Regulations for navigation of South and Southwest Passes of Mississippi River; penalties

The Secretary of the Army is authorized to make such rules and regulations for the navigation of the South and Southwest Passes of the Mississippi River as to him shall seem necessary or expedient for the purpose of preventing any obstruction to the channels through said South and Southwest Passes and any injury to the works therein constructed. The term "South and Southwest Passes", as employed in this section, shall be construed as embracing the entire extent of channel in each case, between the upper ends of the works at the head of the pass and the outer or sea ends of the jetties at the entrance from the Gulf of Mexico; and any willful violation of any rule or regulation made by the Secretary of the Army in pursuance of this section shall be deemed a misdemeanor, for which the owner or owners, agent or agents, master or pilot of the vessel so offending shall be separately or collectively responsible, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not less than $100, nor exceeding $500, or by imprisonment for not exceeding three months, or by both fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court.

(Mar. 3, 1909, ch. 264, §5, 35 Stat. 818; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

These provisions were part of section 5 of act Mar. 3, 1909, popularly known as the "River and Harbor Appropriation Act of 1909".

These provisions superseded previous similar provisions relating to the navigation of the South Pass only, contained in act Aug. 11, 1888, ch. 860, §5, 25 Stat. 424, amended by act Sept. 19, 1890, ch. 907, §3, 26 Stat. 452.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Timothy T. Page, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Telecomm.com, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date: June 18, 2003 | By: /s/ Timothy T. Page                                               
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Timothy T. Page, Chief Executive Officer & Principal
Financial Officer
NRC TO DISCUSS PROPOSED AIRCRAFT IMPACT ASSESSMENT RULE 

NOVEMBER 15 IN ROCKVILLE, MD 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Nov. 15 in 

Rockville, Md., to discuss the need for designers of new reactors to assess the level of 

built-in protection a particular reactor design has to avoid or reduce the effects of a large 

commercial aircraft impact. 

The meeting on the proposed rule will run from 9:00 a.m. until noon in the 

Commissioners’ Conference Room, on the first floor of the NRC’s One White Flint 

North building, 11555 Rockville Pike. The public is invited to participate and ask 

questions throughout the meeting at designated points in the agenda, available on the 

NRC’s Public Meeting Schedule Web page: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/index.cfm . 

In order to ensure enough meeting materials are available, those interested in 

attending are asked to contact NRC staff members Stewart Schneider at 301-415-4123 or 

George Tartal at 301-415-0016 by Nov. 9. If special accommodations such as a sign 

language interpreter are required, please contact one of these staffers by Nov. 2. The 

public can also access the meeting via a toll-free teleconference; contact Schneider or 

Tartal after Nov. 12 for the telephone number and passcode. The meeting will be 

transcribed and posted on the NRC’s Web site through the agency’s electronic document 

database, ADAMS. 

The proposed rule may be viewed and downloaded via the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal at http://www.regulations.gov . Participants may provide informal comments at the 

meeting, but the NRC will only respond to written comments submitted by Dec 17. 

Comments can be mailed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments 

can be e-mailed to SECY@nrc.gov . If you fail to receive a reply e-mail confirming 

receipt of your comments, please call (301) 415-1966. Comments can also be submitted 

online at the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Comments can be hand-delivered to 11555 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays, or 

faxed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301) 415-1101. Please 

include RIN 3150-AI19 in the subject line. 

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a 

SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's 

Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-143 October 31, 2007
#### § 550.1009 Relationship to premium pay and overtime work.

The premium pay provisions for overtime work in subpart A of this part and section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (FLSA), do not apply to overtime work performed by an employee that is used to earn religious compensatory time off under this subpart. The overtime hours worked to earn religious compensatory time off under this subpart do not create an entitlement to premium pay (including overtime pay) under subpart A of this part or FLSA overtime pay under 5 CFR part 551. Religious compensatory time off is not considered in applying the premium pay limitations described in §§ 550.105, 550.106, and 550.107.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert P. Akins,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cymer, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information.

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Date:  August 11, 2003

 

 
| /s/ ROBERT P. AKINS  Robert P. Akins  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----