alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HEARING SET ON NEVADA’S CHALLENGE TO DOE DOCUMENTS 

CERTIFICATION IN YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROCEEDING 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Pre-License Application Presiding Officer 

(PAPO) Board will hear oral arguments Dec. 5 in Las Vegas on Nevada’s challenge to the 

Department of Energy’s certification of its document collection on the Licensing Support 

Network (LSN) for the Yucca Mountain proceeding. 

 DOE’s certification, filed Oct. 19, is a milestone in DOE’s preparations to file a license 

application for the proposed high-level waste geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev., 

about 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas. The certification is DOE’s declaration that it has made 

available electronically all documents required by NRC regulations generated by DOE or its 

contractors relating to the license application, for use by potential parties to an adjudicatory 

hearing. NRC regulations require DOE to certify its document collection at least six months 

before the department submits its license application. 

 The PAPO Board, consisting of three judges from the agency’s Atomic Safety and 

Licensing Board (ASLB) Panel, was appointed to hear and rule on LSN-related matters before 

the application is submitted. The board will hear oral arguments Dec. 5, beginning at 9 a.m., in 

the NRC’s Las Vegas Hearing Facility, Pacific Enterprise Plaza, Building 1, 3250 Pepper Lane, 

Las Vegas. The hearing room is a multimedia facility constructed in anticipation of the 

adjudicatory hearing on the Yucca Mountain application in order to provide the people of 

Nevada maximum access to the hearing. 

 Cox Communications, Las Vegas, will provide at no cost a live feed of the proceeding 

via satellite to the NRC and to broadcast media in southern Nevada and nationwide as a public 

service, and will broadcast the proceedings live on its local access channel, Cox 96. Media 

outlets desiring access to the feed should contact Juergen Barbusca, manager of communications, 

at Cox Las Vegas, at (702) 545-1004, or juergen.barbusca@cox.com. 

 In addition, the proceeding will be available for public viewing at the ASLB hearing 

room in NRC headquarters, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., 

beginning at 12 p.m. Eastern time. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-155 November 20, 2007
 Members of the public wishing to attend the proceeding at either the Las Vegas Hearing 

Facility or at NRC headquarters should budget enough time to allow for security screening. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.904 Basic requirement. ( a ) An employee is required to serve a probationary period prescribed by the agency upon initial appointment to a supervisory and/or managerial position.
( b ) An employee is required to complete a single probationary period in a supervisory position and a single probationary period in a managerial position, regardless of the number of agencies, occupations, or positions in which the employee serves. However, an agency may by regulation provide for exceptions to the probationary period for managers who have satisfactorily completed a probationary period for supervisors when justified on the basis of performance and experience.
( c ) Employees who, as of the date this requirement is effective, are serving or have served in Federal civilian supervisory or managerial positions without time limitation, or in time-limited supervisory or managerial positions under an official assignment exceeding 120 days, are exempt from its provisions, except that supervisors who are assigned to managerial positions may, according to agency regulations, be required to serve a probationary period for managers.
No: II-07-045 September 17, 2007 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC SETS PUBLIC MEETING WITH FARLEY ON SEPT. 20 IN DOTHAN 

TO DISCUSS INSPECTION OF COOLING WATER SYSTEM BREAKER FAILURES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting with Farley nuclear 

power plant officials on Sept. 20 in Dothan, Ala., to discuss preliminary results of a five-member 

inspection team’s review of Component Cooling Water System breaker failures. 

 

 The meeting will begin at 5:30 p.m. (CDT) in the County Commissioners Chambers on 

the Third Floor of the Houston County Administration Building, located at 462 North Oats 

Street. 

 The NRC dispatched what the agency calls an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to 

Farley on Sept. 10 to review the failures of electrical breakers for component cooling water 

pumps. The component cooling water system does not provide cooling water for the reactor. It 

circulates water through a closed system to cool other plant systems and components. 

 On Sept. 4 and 5, two different electrical breakers associated with component cooling 

water pumps on Unit 1 failed to close during testing. The breakers were replaced, and the 

company is trouble shooting the failures. NRC officials said that, because Farley has 

experienced previous breaker issues, and this condition has the potential to be applicable to 

similar breakers in safety-related systems on both Unit 1 and Unit 2, the agency determined that 

an AIT, formed to review circumstances surrounding more significant issues at NRC-licensed 

facilities, was appropriate. 

 The meeting is open to the public, and interested observers will have an opportunity to 

communicate with the NRC after the business portion, but before the meeting is adjourned. 

### 

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC home page at www.nrc.gov also 

offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are 

posted to NRC’s Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
### §59r. Trent River, Craven County, North Carolina

Those portions of the Trent River in the city of New Bern, county of Craven, State of North Carolina, bounded and described in Committee Print 95–56 of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives are hereby declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States within the meaning of the laws of the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–520, §3, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3036.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Public Works and Transportation of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of House of Representatives by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress.
### §10233. Prohibition on land acquisition

No funds under this chapter shall be used for land acquisition.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §814, formerly §821, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1214; renumbered §814, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609B(f), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3789j of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 814 of Pub. L. 90–351 was classified to section 3789c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to repeal by section 609B(e) of Pub. L. 98–473.
# L_2016340EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 340/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Stepping Stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part

The European Union and the Republic of Ghana have notified the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Stepping Stone Economic Partnership Agreement between Ghana, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part (1), in accordance with Article 75 of that Agreement. Consequently, the Agreement applies provisionally as from 15 December 2016 between the European Union and the Republic of Ghana.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 287, 21.10.2016, p. 1.

1

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1969

To suspend temporarily the duty on BEPD70L. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on BEPD70L.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BEPD70L. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.03 Mixture of 

BEPD and 

Neopentyl Glycol 

(CAS Nos. 115–

84–4 and 126–

30–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

3824.90.91) ....... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•HR 1969 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2      Section 906 Certification of CFO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill
Moses, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


BY:  /s/ Merrill Moses
     -----------------
     Merrill Moses
     President and CFO
     June 8, 2006
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID WESLEY SCHUMACHER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-730

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 23, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Charlotte County; George Richards 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public 

Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr. 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for 

Appellant. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14

                                   AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                         1993 BURLINGTON RESOURCES INC.
                              STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

         The 1993 Burlington Resources Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is
hereby amended in the following respects:

                  1.       The last sentence of Section 9.2 of the Plan is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "If the Plan Administrator determines that any shares of Restricted
         Stock granted or to be granted under the Plan will be represented by
         the issuance of certificates, the Plan Administrator may require, under
         such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate or desirable, that
         the certificates for such Restricted Stock may be held in custody by a
         bank or other institution, or that the Company may itself hold such
         shares in custody until the Restriction Period (as defined in Section
         9.3) expires or until restrictions thereon otherwise lapse, and may
         require, as a condition of any receipt of Restricted Stock, that the
         Participant shall have delivered a stock power endorsed in blank
         relating to the shares of Restricted Stock."

                  2.       Section 9.8 of the Plan is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

         "9.8 The Plan Administrator shall in its discretion determine whether
         any shares of Restricted Stock granted or to be granted under the Plan
         will be represented by the issuance of a certificate for such shares
         registered in the name of the Participant (subject to Section 9.2) or
         will be represented by a book entry reflecting the grant to the
         Participant."

                  3.       The first sentence of Section 11.2 of the Plan is
amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         "All certificates for shares issued in respect of Restricted Stock
         awards or in respect of the exercise of Stock Purchase Rights shall be
         subject to such stop-transfer orders and other restrictions as the Plan
         Administrator may deem advisable under the rules, regulations and other
         requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock
         exchange upon which Common Stock is then listed and any applicable
         federal or state securities laws, and the Plan Administrator may cause
         a legend or legends to be placed on any such certificates to make
         appropriate reference to such restrictions."

                  Adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Burlington Resources Inc. on December 17, 2003.
U n i t e d S t a t e s G o v e r n m e n t FORM G-ll5f(l-92)

R a i l r o a d R e t i r e m e n t B o a r d

MEMORANDUM

FOR BOARD INFORMATION

TO

FROM

The Board

Steven A. Bartholow 

General C o u n s e l/^

SUBJECT Legislative Analysis - Public Law 106-182

Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act of 2000

The Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act of 2000, Public Law 106-182, was signed into 

law by President Clinton on April 7, 2000. In general, it amends the Social Security Act 

effective for years after December 31, 1999, to remove any reduction of benefits due to 

earnings by beneficiaries age 65 through 69. After this year, exemption from earnings 

deductions will be tied to attainment of “retirement age,” which will gradually increase from 

age 65 to age 67.

Under prior law social security recipients aged 65 through 69 could earn up to $17,000 

without being subject to work deductions. Beneficiaries in that age group who earned 

more than $17,000 lost $1.00 for every $3.00 in earnings above the threshold.

Individuals under retirement age lose $1.00 for every $2.00 that the earnings exceed the 

exempt amount. This earnings restriction was not affected by enactment of the Senior 

Citizens' Freedom to Work Act of 2000.

Public Law 106-182 continues the treatment under prior law of excess earnings in the year 

in which the beneficiary attains retirement age. In the year in which a person attains 

retirement age, deductions for earnings over the exempt amount in months prior to 

attainment of retirement age will be made at the rate of $1.00 for every $3.00 that the 

earnings exceed the exempt amount.

In addition, section 4(b) of the Act provides that an individual shall receive a delayed 

retirement credit for any month after retirement age that is not paid either due to work or 

if the individual requests that his/her annuity not be paid.
- 2 -

The amendments made by Public Law 106-182 also apply to benefits payable under the 

Railroad Retirement Act. The amendment eliminating the excess earnings reductions for 

persons upon attainment of retirement age applies t<? tier I benefits, vested dual benefits 

and survivor annuities. The amendment made by section 4(b) of Public Law 106-182 

applies to the computation of tier I benefits. The disability earnings and last person 

employment restrictions in the Railroad Retirement Act are unaffected by Public Law 106- 

182. In addition, the Railroad Retirement Act continues to preclude the payment of an 

annuity for any month in which the beneficiary performs compensated service for an 

employer under the Act.

cc: Director of Programs

Director of Hearings and Appeals

Chief Financial Officer

Acting Director of Legislative Affairs

AAArfa:aa

H:\BILLSU T\senior citizen freedom to work 2000.doc
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-085 June 26, 2006

NRC RENEWS OPERATING LICENSES FOR 

BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Brunswick

Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, for an additional 20 years.

The Brunswick plant is located south of Wilmington, N.C., at the mouth of the Cape Fear

River. The licensee, Carolina Power & Light Co., submitted its license renewal application Oct. 18,

2004. With the renewal, the license for Unit 1 is extended until Sept. 8, 2036, and the license for Unit 2

is extended until Dec. 27, 2034.

The NRC’s environmental review for this license renewal is described in a site-specific

supplement to the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear

Power Plants” (NUREG-1437, Supplement 25), issued in April. The review concluded there were no

environmental impacts that would preclude renewal of the licenses for environmental reasons. Public

meetings to discuss the environmental review were held near the plant Jan. 27, 2005, and Oct. 18,

2005.

After carefully reviewing the plant’s safety systems and specifications, the staff concluded that

there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had

demonstrated effectively the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. The “Safety Evaluation

Report Related to the License Renewal of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2”

(NUREG-1856) was published in March. In addition, NRC conducted inspections of the plant to verify

information submitted by the licensee. The reports relating to the Brunswick renewal are available on

the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/brunswick.html .

On May 17, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards - an independent body of technical

experts which advises the Commission - issued its recommendation that the operating licenses for

Brunswick be renewed. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the Safety Aspects of the

License Renewal Application for the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2.” This document is

available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2006/ .
The Brunswick renewals bring the total number of renewals to 44 reactor units. A complete

listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

###
### §10445. Staff of Office on Violence Against Women

The Attorney General shall ensure that the Director has adequate staff to support the Director in carrying out the Director's responsibilities under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2005, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title IV, §402(3), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1791; amended Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title IX, §901(d), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 911.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796gg–0c of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2005 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2010 and is classified to section 10449 of this title.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–103 substituted "Office on Violence Against Women" for "Violence Against Women Office" in section catchline.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–103 not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 90 days after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 403 of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 10442 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-083 May 24, 2005

NRC LICENSING BOARD DENIES THE STATE OF UTAH’S MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD’S FINAL PARTIAL INITIAL DECISION

APPROVING THE PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE APPLICATION

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, an independent adjudicatory arm of the Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, issued a decision today essentially denying the State of Utah’s Motion for

Reconsideration of the Board’s Feb. 24, 2005 Final Partial Initial Decision on the spent nuclear fuel

storage facility proposed for Skull Valley, Utah, by the Private Fuel Storage (PFS) consortium. 

In February, after a formal 16-day hearing which was closed for security purposes, the Board

rejected the State’s assertion that there is too high a probability that the accidental crash of an F-16

traveling through Skull Valley from Hill Air Force Base could puncture the internal canister of a

storage cask, causing a radiological release, and today adhered to that determination. 

The State’s motion raised several challenges to the Board’s February decision. The Board

rejected several State claims regarding technical issues. Additionally, the Board rejected the State’s

argument that it was being improperly deprived of the opportunity to show that some accidents, while

not breaching the canister holding the spent fuel, might cause enough damage to the shielding of the

outer cask to result in an excessive radiation dose. The Board concluded that the State had not raised

that issue at the hearing. The Board did, however, suggest to the Commission that, in its supervisory

role over the NRC staff, it consider directing the staff to fully examine this matter and report back to it.

In the course of its ruling, the Board noted that the State had properly brought its attention to

points not explicitly addressed in the Feb. 24 decision. After examining those matters, however, the

Board held that none of the procedural or substantive deficiencies claimed by the State were “of

sufficient merit and/or moment to alter the result.” The Board thus remained convinced that the

likelihood of a consequential accidental F-16 crash is less than the one-in-a-million per year standard

set by the Commission.

The Commission had previously held in abeyance the time within which the parties may appeal

the Board’s decision. With today’s ruling, the matter is no longer in abeyance and the appeal period

outlined in the Feb. 24 decision is once again in effect. The question of whether to issue the requested

PFS license remains in the Commission’s hands.

###