alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 171 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 171

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision that 
limited the interest deduction on refinanced home mortgage indebtedness 
          to the amount of the indebtedness being refinanced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Reynolds (for himself and Mrs. Myrick) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision that 
limited the interest deduction on refinanced home mortgage indebtedness 
          to the amount of the indebtedness being refinanced.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeowner Refinance Fairness Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REFINANCING LIMITATION ON DEDUCTION FOR HOME MORTGAGE 
              INTEREST.

    (a) In General.--The last sentence of section 163(h)(3)(B)(i) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
``Such term also includes any indebtedness secured by such residence 
resulting from the refinancing of indebtedness meeting the requirements 
of the preceding sentence (or this sentence); but only to the extent 
the amount of the indebtedness resulting from such refinancing does not 
exceed the limitation under clause (ii).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 630.1601 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) This subpart implements 5 U.S.C. 6329c, which allows an agency to provide a separate type of paid leave when weather or other safety-related conditions prevent employees from safely traveling to or safely performing work at an approved location due to an act of God, terrorist attack, or other applicable condition. Section 6329c(d) directs OPM to prescribe regulations to carry out the statutory provisions on weather and safety leave, including regulations on the appropriate uses and the proper recording of this leave.
( b ) This subpart applies to an employee as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105 who is employed in an agency, but does not apply to an intermittent employee who, by definition, does not have an established regular tour of duty during the administrative workweek.
( c ) As provided in 5 U.S.C. 6329c(e), this subpart applies to employees described in subsection (b) of 38 U.S.C. 7421, notwithstanding subsection (a) of that section.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 12(a).1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  Hanaro Telecom, Inc. (the "Company") is filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

                  I, IN-HAENG LEE, Representative Director/Senior Executive Vice
President (performing similar functions of a chief executive officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (i)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

    /s/ In-Haeng Lee
----------------------
IN-HAENG LEE
Representative Director/Senior Executive Vice President
June 5, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Hanaro Telecom, Inc., and will be retained by Hanaro Telecom, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 340.403 Intermittent employment. ( a ) *Appropriate use.* An intermittent work schedule is appropriate only when the nature of the work is sporadic and unpredictable so that a tour of duty cannot be regularly scheduled in advance. When an agency is able to schedule work in advance on a regular basis, it has an obligation to document the change in work schedule from intermittent to part-time or full-time to ensure proper service credit.
( b ) *Noncompetitive movement.* Intermittent employees serving under career appointment may move to other positions in the same way as other regular career employees.
### §10238. Accountability and oversight

#### (a) Report by grant recipients

The Attorney General or Secretary of Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall require grantees under any program authorized or reauthorized by this division or an amendment made by this division to report on the effectiveness of the activities carried out with amounts made available to carry out that program, including number of persons served, if applicable, numbers of persons seeking services who could not be served and such other information as the Attorney General or Secretary may prescribe.

#### (b) Report to Congress

The Attorney General or Secretary of Health and Human Services, as applicable, shall report biennially to the Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate on the grant programs described in subsection (a), including the information contained in any report under that subsection.

(Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, §1003, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1491.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This division, referred to in subsec. (a), is division B of Pub. L. 106–386, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1491, known as the Violence Against Women Act of 2000. For complete classification of division B to the Code, see Short Title of 2000 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Violence Against Women Act of 2000, and also as part of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, and not as part of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 3789p of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 831.2010 Transfers between retirement systems.

Transfers of employees' contributions between the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund and other retirement systems for Federal or District of Columbia employees when made in accordance with Federal statute for the purpose of transferring retirement service credit to the other retirement system are not subject to the notice requirements or court order provisions of this subpart.

[51 FR 31937, Sept. 8, 1986]
# L_2015202EN.01004001.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/40

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 188/2014

of 25 September 2014

amending Annex VI (Social security) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1256]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex VI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex VI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12 (Council Directive 98/49/EC) of Annex VI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘13. | 32014 L 0050: Directive 2014/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on minimum requirements for enhancing worker mobility between Member States by improving the acquisition and preservation of supplementary pension rights (OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/50/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 128, 30.4.2014, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §20128. Agency and department coordination

Each head of an Executive department (as defined in section 101 of title 5) responsible for carrying out a program under this Act, the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (title IV of Public Law 103–322; 108 Stat. 1902), the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–386; 114 Stat. 1491), the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005 (title IX of Public Law 109–162; 119 Stat. 3080) 1, or the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–4; 127 Stat. 54) may coordinate and collaborate on the prevention of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, including sharing best practices and efficient use of resources and technology for victims and those seeking assistance from the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, §3, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, Apr. 6, 2022, 136 Stat. 840, known as the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Act of 2022. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as a Short Title of 2022 Amendment note under section 10101 of this title, and Tables.

The Violence Against Women Act of 1994, referred to in text, is title IV of Pub. L. 103–322, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1902. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 40001 of Pub. L. 103–322, set out as a Short Title of 1994 Act note under section 10101 of this title, and Tables.

The Violence Against Women Act of 2000, referred to in text, is div. B of Pub. L. 106–386, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1491. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2000 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

The Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 109–162, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2960. Section 3 and Titles I to IX of the Act are known as the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2005. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of Pub. L. 109–162, set out as a Short Title of 2006 Act note under section 10101 of this title, and Tables.

The Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 113–4, Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 54. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of Pub. L. 113–4, set out as a Short Title of 2013 Act note under section 10101 of this title, and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as a note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 12291 of this title, as made applicable by section 2(b) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, which is set out as a note under section 12291 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### subpart 2—assistance to victims of sexual assault
#### In the Matter of Luciano Aufiero, on Behalf of Philip S. Aufiero, an Infant, Respondent, against Town of Eastchester, Appellant.

Application on behalf of an infant for leave to serve a notice of claim against the Town of Eastohester pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e-of the General Municipal Law. It appears that eight days after the accident a letter was written by the attorney for the four-year-old infant to the clerk of the village of Tuekahoe informing him of the 'pertinent facts,- that said letter was forwarded to the clerk of the town of Eastohester, that both the village and the town caused an investigation to be made, that plaintiff’s failure to timely file a proper notice of claim was due solely to his attorney’s oversight, and that the present application was made within one year after the happening of the accident. The Town of Eastohester appeals from the order granting leave to serve the notice of claim. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F (the annual report) of Oromin Explorations Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  January 31, 2007



(signed):    Chet Idziszek



Chet Idziszek

President and Chief Executive Officer
B.C.D. 02-5 JAN 1 7 2002

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Three Notch Railroad Company. Inc.

This is the determination ofthe Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of

Three Notch Railroad Company, Inc. (TNRC) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.) (RUIA).

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket No. 33981, decided

June 22, 2001, TNRC filed a verified notice of exemption to acquire and operate a

line ofrailroad owned in part and leased in part by Alabama and Florida Railway

Company (A&F). The rail line begins approximately at the interchange point with

CSX Transportation in Georgiana, Alabama, and A&F milepost 581.3 in

Andalusia, Alabama, a distance of approximately 35 route miles in Covington,

Butler and Conecuh counties, Alabama. The STB decision stated that TNRC and

A&F intended to consummate the transaction on or after the June 8, 2001 effective

date ofthe exemption.

Information regarding TNRC was provided by Mr. H. Peter Claussen, Chairman of

TNRC. According to Mr. Claussen, Gulf & Ohio Railways Holding Company is

the owner of TNRC. Mr. Claussen stated that TNRC began rail operations over its

rail line on October 15, 2001 with 7 employees. Mr. Claussen further stated that

TNRC provides common carrier freight service and expects to handle

approximately 1800 carloads of freight annually. Mr. Claussen also stated that 

TNRC interchanges with CSXT and Alabama and Florida Railroad.

Section 1(a)(1) ofthe Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)), insofar as

relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction ofthe Surface

Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV oftitle 49, United States

Code;

Section 1 ofthe RUIA contains essentially the same definition, as does section 

3231 ofthe Railroad Retirement Tax Act.

The evidence ofrecord establishes that TNRC is a rail carrier operating in

interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that Three Notch Railroad 

Company became an employer within the meaning ofsection 1 (a)(l )(i) ofthe

BA# 5583
-2-

Three Notch Railroad Company, Inc

Railroad Retirement Act and its corresponding provision ofthe Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Act effective October 15, 2001, the date as ofwhich its

first employee was first compensated. [Cf. Rev. Rule. 82-100, 1982-1 C.B. 155,

wherein the IRS held that a company became an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Tax Act on the date it hired employees to perform functions directly

related to its carrier operations.]

A/rA Oh.*

V. M. Speakman, Jr. ^

e
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2007 (the "Report"), I,
      Keith
      E. Palmer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Keith E. Palmer


Keith
      E.
      Palmer


Chief
      Financial Officer and


Executive
      Vice President





March
      2,
      2007
#### Moses Singer, Plaintiff in Error, *v.*The People of the State of New York, Defendants in Error.

(Argued November 22, 1878;

decided December 10, 1878.)

Reported below, 13 Hun, 418.

*Max Huebner*for plaintiff in error.

*Benjamin K. Phelps*for defendants in error.

Agree to affirm without opinion.

All concur, except Church. Ch. J., dissenting.

Judgment affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2016

JEFFREY BINKIS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WASHINGTON COUNTY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen Lipton Hollander, Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 02158

- ELH )

Submitted : September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022

Before WILKINSON , DIAZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jeffrey Binkis , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2016 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Binkis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as
frivolous . We have r eviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Binkis v. Washington Cnty. , No. 1:21

- cv - 02158

- ELH (D. Md. Aug

. 31, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-2016 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### § 550.331 Scope.

An agency shall permit an employee to make an allotment for dues to an association of management officials and/or supervisors when the employee is a supervisor or management official, and the employee is a member of an association of management officials and/or supervisors with which the agency has agreed in writing to deduct allotments for the payment of dues to the association.
### §10643. Statewide strategic prevention plan

#### (a) In general

A statewide strategic prevention plan shall be used by the rural State to assist local communities, both directly and through existing State programs and services, in building comprehensive, strategic, and innovative approaches to reducing crime, violence, and substance abuse based on local conditions and needs.

#### (b) Goals

The plan must contain statewide long-term goals and measurable annual objectives for reducing crime, violence, and substance abuse.

#### (c) Accountability

The rural State shall be required to develop and report in its plan relevant performance targets and measures for the goals and objectives to track changes in crime, violence, and substance abuse.

#### (d) Consultation

The rural State shall form a State crime free communities commission that includes representatives of State and local government, and community leaders who will provide advice and recommendations on relevant community goals and objectives, and performance targets and measures.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2987, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11027(b), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1834.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797y–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Ex. 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Loren Moll, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date: May 16, 2008

                                            /s/  Loren Moll
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Loren Moll,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
#### Martin V. W. Hall, Respondent, v. Woodmere Homestead Company and Another, Defendants. John McVickar Richmond, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.