alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §983. Functions of Corporation

#### (a) Construction of deep-water navigation works in Saint Lawrence River; conditions precedent

The Corporation is authorized and directed to construct, in United States territory, deep-water navigation works substantially in accordance with the "Controlled single stage project, 238–242" (with a controlling depth of twenty-seven feet in channels and canals and locks at least eight hundred feet long, eighty feet wide, and thirty feet over the sills), designated as "works solely for navigation" in the joint report dated January 3, 1941, of the Canadian Temporary Great Lakes-Saint Lawrence Basin Committee and the United States Saint Lawrence Advisory Committee, in the International Rapids section of the Saint Lawrence River together with necessary dredging in the Thousand Islands section; and to operate and maintain such works in coordination with the Saint Lawrence Seaway Authority of Canada, created by chapter 24 of the acts of the fifth session of the Twenty-first Parliament of Canada 15–16, George VI (assented to December 21, 1951): Provided, That the Corporation shall not proceed with the aforesaid construction unless and until—

(1) the Saint Lawrence Seaway Authority of Canada, provides assurances satisfactory to the Corporation that it will complete the Canadian portions of the navigation works authorized by section 10, chapter 24 of the acts of the fifth session of the Twenty-first Parliament of Canada 15–16, George VI, 1951, as nearly as possible concurrently with the completion of the works authorized by this section;

(2) the Corporation has received assurances satisfactory to it that the State of New York, or an entity duly designated by it, or other licensee of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in conjunction with an appropriate agency in Canada, as nearly as possible concurrently with the navigation works herein authorized, will construct and complete the dams and power works approved by the International Joint Commission in its order of October 29, 1952 (docket 68) or any amendment or modification thereof.

#### (b) Coordination of activities regarding power projects

The Corporation shall make necessary arrangements to assure the coordination of its activities with those of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Authority of Canada and the entity designated by the State of New York, or other licensee of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, authorized to construct and operate the dams and power works authorized by the International Joint Commission in its order of October 29, 1952 (docket 68) or any amendment or modification thereof.

(May 13, 1954, ch. 201, §3, 68 Stat. 93; Pub. L. 95–91, title IV, §402(a)(1)(A), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 583.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" substituted for "Federal Power Commission" in subsecs. (a)(2) and (b), on authority of Pub. L. 95–91, title IV, §402(a)(1)(A), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 583, which is classified to section 7172(a)(1)(A) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2030

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, 

as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2030 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan W. Matthias,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| May 10, 2007              |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7613
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CAMILLE FORD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CR-94-163, CA-98-1206) Submitted: February 28, 2003 Decided: June 2, 2003 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Camille Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen her previous § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ford , Nos. CR-94-163; CA98-1206 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Adelaide Neuwirth, Appellant, and Ruth D. Salmon et al., Interveners, Appellants, v. Hans Wyman et al., Respondents.

Order denying the motion ©f plaintiff Neuwirth and intervener Salmon to vacate or modify the notice of examination unanimously affirmed. The order denying a similar motion made by the other intervener plaintiffs is unanimously affirmed only as to those intervener plaintiffs who are residents of the city of New York and otherwise modified as follows: The intervener plaintiffs residing outside the city may be examined at their respective places of residence upon written interrogatories, as provided in section 302 of the Civil Practice Act and the Rules of Civil Practice applicable to such examinations. At the option of the defendants-respondents, upon payment by them of traveling and other expenses involved, any of said intervener plaintiffs may be examined in the borough of Manhattan as provided in the order appealed from. Lastly, if defendants-respondents so elect, the testimony of any intervener plaintiffs may be taken at their place of residence upon open commission. In such event the necessary disbursements of the attorneys for both sides in attending upon the examination shall be paid by the defendants-respondents. Settle order on notice. Present — Callahan, J. Pv Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 708.]
### §20707. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Severe forms of trafficking in persons

The term "severe forms of trafficking in persons" has the meaning given the term in section 7102(9) 1 of title 22.

#### (2) Sex trafficking

The term "sex trafficking" has the meaning given the term in section 7102(10) 1 of title 22.

#### (3) Commercial sex act

The term "commercial sex act" has the meaning given the term in section 7102(4) of title 22.

(Pub. L. 109–164, title II, §207, Jan. 10, 2006, 119 Stat. 3572; Pub. L. 113–4, title XII, §1212(b)(2)(C), Mar. 7, 2013, 127 Stat. 144.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 109–164, Jan. 10, 2006, 119 Stat. 3567, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Tables.

Section 7102(9) and (10) of title 22, referred to in pars. (1) and (2), was redesignated section 7102(11) and (12), respectively, of title 22 by Pub. L. 115–427, §2(1), Jan. 9, 2019, 132 Stat. 5503.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14044e of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2013—Par. (1). Pub. L. 113–4, §1212(b)(2)(C)(i), substituted "section 7102(9)" for "section 7102(8)".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 113–4, §1212(b)(2)(C)(ii), substituted "section 7102(10)" for "section 7102(9)".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 113–4, §1212(b)(2)(C)(iii), substituted "section 7102(4)" for "section 7102(3)".

1 See References in Text note below.
### §130508. Principal office

The principal office of the corporation shall be in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, or another place decided by the board of directors. However, the activities of the corporation may be conducted throughout the world.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1378.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130508 | 36:1075(a). | July 16, 1964, Pub. L. 88–378, §5(a), 78 Stat. 326. |

Section

The words "shall not be confined to that place and" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "throughout the various States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States, and in other areas" are omitted as included in "throughout the world".
#### § 211.103 Administration of preference.

Agencies are responsible for making all preference determinations except for preference based on a common law marriage. Such a claim must be referred to OPM's General Counsel for decision.
#### In re Daniel S. POPLAWSKI and James W. McGinley (Assigned to Stratos Lightwave, Inc.),

No. 01-1598.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 14, 2002.

Rehearing Denied June 6, 2002.

Before NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36
# L_2017161EN.01006401.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/64

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 276/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1065]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 of 29 June 2015 laying down a list classifying occurrences in civil aviation to be mandatorily reported according to Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 of 29 June 2015 laying down a list classifying occurrences in civil aviation to be mandatorily reported according to Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 66gc (Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66gd. | 32015 R 1018: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 of 29 June 2015 laying down a list classifying occurrences in civil aviation to be mandatorily reported according to Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 163, 30.6.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66gd.

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 275/2015 of 30 October 2015 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 163, 30.6.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  See page 62 of this Official Journal.

2

---
#### Suzanne A. Roth, Appellant, v. Simon I. Patino, Defendant, and Albino R. De Patino et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present ■ — ■ Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 921.]
NRC REMINDS NEW REACTOR APPLICANTS AND EXISTING PLANTS OF NEED 

TO GUARD AGAINST COUNTERFEIT PARTS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reminding reactor license applicants and nuclear 

power plant operators of their responsibility to prevent counterfeit parts from posing a safety 

concern. 

The agency issued an Information Notice to ensure the nuclear power industry is aware of 

two counterfeit part incidents from 2007, neither of which affected plant safety. 

“Nuclear power plants require high-quality components that meet rigorous standards,” 

said Bill Borchardt, Director of the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “As the industry prepares for 

possible new plants, we want both utilities and construction companies to ensure their suppliers 

are up to the job.” 

The notice recounts previous NRC documents covering counterfeit or misrepresented 

products, and lists three keys to effectively ensuring the use of quality nuclear-grade products: 

• Involve engineering staff in procuring and accepting products; 

• Inspect parts both at the vendor’s plant and after receipt, along with testing parts before use, 

and; 

• Extensively review and test any commercial products before considering their use in safetyrelated applications. 

The Information Notice is available on the NRC’s Web site here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/info-notices/2008/index.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-072 April 8, 2008
§ 752.406 Agency records. The agency must maintain copies of, and will furnish to the Merit Systems Protection Board and to the employee upon his or her request, the following documents: ( a ) Notice of the proposed action;
( b ) Employee's written reply, if any;
( c ) Summary of the employee's oral reply, if any;
( d ) Notice of decision; and
( e ) Any order effecting the action, together with any supporting material.
Exhibit 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8, File No. 333-46438, of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. of our report
dated January 18, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2001
#### George T. Haner et al., appellees, v. Ella K. Palmer, appellant.

Filed February 15, 1911.

No. 16,309.

1. Appearance. By a general appearance in an action the defendant waives all defects in the original summons.

2. Appeal: Petition. The objection that the petition in the district court states a different cause of action from the one tried in the justice court cannot be considered, where the record does not contain a copy of the original bill of particulars.

3. Principal and Agent: Evidence. A letter written by an agent of a party with his knowledge and consent ordinarily is competent evidence against him.

4. Appeal: Conflicting Evidence. A judgment rendered upon conflicting evidence will not be reversed unless it is found to be clearly wrong.

Appeal from the district court for Saline county-: Leslie G. Hurd, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Joshua Palmer,*for appellant.

*B. M. Proudfit, contra.*

*439Barnes, J.

The plaintiffs recovered a judgment in the district court for Saline county for money expended in furnishing an abstract of title for the defendant at her request, and she has appealed.

It appears that the plaintiffs commenced their action in justice court, where they recovered a judgment from which the defendant appealed to the district court, where the plaintiffs again had judgment. Complaint is now made of the insufficiency of the summons issued by the justice of the peace, but that question cannot be considered, for the reason that the defendant appeared generally in the justice court, and asked for and procured a continuance of the cause for the period of 30 days. By such appearance she waived all defects in the original summons. *Stelling v. Peddicord,*78 Neb. 779; *Merchants Savings Bank v. Noll,*50 Neb. 615.

It is further claimed that the petition in the district court set forth a different cause of action from the one sued on in the justice court. This assignment cannot be considered for the record does not contain the original bill of particulars upon which the cause was tried in the justice court.

It is also stated that the court erred in the admission of a certain part of plaintiffs’ evidence, to wit, the letter to plaintiffs requesting them to prepare the abstract in question. The objection is that the defendant did not write the letter herself. It appears that the letter was written with her knowledge and consent by her husband, who, she admits, was her agent and was entrusted with the management of her business. ' Therefore the letter was competent evidence against her. Finally, it is contended that the judgment is not sustained by the evidence. It appears that the judgment was rendered -upon conflicting testimony, and, as it is not shown to be clearly wrong, it must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2059

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State of New Mexico 
        as a National Historic Landmark, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2059

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate Fort Bayard Historic District in the State of New Mexico 
        as a National Historic Landmark, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORT BAYARD NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK ACT.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Fort Bayard 
National Historic Landmark Act''.
    (b) Designation.--The Fort Bayard Historic District in Grant 
County, New Mexico, as listed on the National Register of Historic 
Places, is hereby designated as the Fort Bayard National Historic 
Landmark.
    (c) Administration.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
administration of the Fort Bayard Historic District by the State of New 
Mexico.
    (d) Cooperative Agreements.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
the State of New Mexico, Grant County, New Mexico, and affected 
subdivisions of Grant County, may enter into cooperative agreements 
with appropriate public or private entities, for the purposes of 
protecting historic resources at Fort Bayard and providing educational 
and interpretive facilities and programs for the public. The Secretary 
shall not enter into any agreement or provide assistance to any 
activity affecting Fort Bayard State Hospital without the concurrence 
of the State of New Mexico.
    (e) Technical and Financial Assistance.--The Secretary may provide 
technical and financial assistance with any entity with which the 
Secretary has entered into a cooperative agreement under subsection 
(d).
    (f) No Effect on Actions of Property Owners.--Designation of the 
Fort Bayard Historic District as a National Historic Landmark shall not 
prohibit any actions which may otherwise be taken by any property 
owners, including the owners of the Fort Bayard National Historic 
Landmark, with respect to their property.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```