alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8




 




 




January 9, 2003




 




Mr. Joseph C. Christenson




President




PPT Vision, Inc.




12988 Valley View Road




Eden Prairie, MN   55344




 




Dear Joe:




 




             In response to our recent

discussions about the potential capital requirements of PPT Vision, Inc.,  I hereby advise you that the Investors

listed below would be willing to provide 

$500,000-$750,000 of additional capital to the Company, depending upon

the Company’s needs, through April 30, 2004.




 




             I anticipate the investment would

take the form of one or more of (i) a working capital line of credit (ii) a

convertible note or debenture, (iii) preferred stock or (iv) common stock.  In connection to any line of credit or debt

instrument , a security interest in some or all of the Company’s assets,

including intellectual property might be required.




 




             This loan or investment would be

made by one or more of the following Investors: (i) P R Peterson individually

(including through the PR Peterson Keogh Plan), (ii) ESI Investment Company and

(iii) Peterson Brothers Securities Company.




 




             I am available to meet with members

of management or the Company’s Board of Directors at your convenience to

finalize the terms of any financing.




 








	

  Very truly yours,


  
	

   


  
	

  /s/ PETER R. PETERSON


  	

   


  
	

  P. R. Peterson
### §949. Effect of unconstitutionality

If any part of this chapter is adjudged unconstitutional by the courts, and such adjudication has the effect of invalidating any payment of compensation under this chapter, the period intervening between the time the injury was sustained and the time of such adjudication shall not be computed as a part of the time prescribed by law for the commencement of any action against the employer in respect of such injury; but the amount of any compensation paid under this chapter on account of such injury shall be deducted from the amount of damages awarded in such action in respect of such injury.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §50 formerly §49, 44 Stat. 1446; renumbered §50, Pub. L. 92–576, §19, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1263.)
§ 831.1207 Withdrawal of disability retirement applications. ( a ) OPM will honor, without question, an applicant's request to withdraw an employee-filed disability retirement application if it receives the withdrawal request before the employing agency has separated the current employee, or, if the employee has already separated from the service, the withdrawal request is received before the official notice of approval has been issued by OPM. Similarly, OPM will honor, without question, an agency's request to withdraw an agency-filed disability retirement application if it receives the withdrawal request before the employee has separated from the service. Once the request to withdraw the application is accepted, an applicant must reapply to receive any further consideration.
( b ) Withdrawal of a disability retirement application does not ensure the individual's continued employment. It is the employing agency's responsibility to determine whether it is appropriate to continue to employ the individual.
( c ) OPM considers voluntary acceptance of a permanent position in which the employee has civil service retirement coverage, including a position at a lower grade or pay level, to be a withdrawal of the employee's disability retirement application. The employing agency must notify OPM immediately when an applicant for disability retirement accepts a position of this type.
( d ) OPM also considers a disability retirement application to be withdrawn when the agency reports to OPM that it has reassigned an applicant or an employee has refused a reassignment to a vacant position, or the agency reports to OPM that it has successfully accommodated the medical condition in the employee's current position. Placement consideration is limited only by agency authority and can occur after OPM's allowance of the application up to the date of separation for disability retirement. The employing agency must notify OPM immediately if any of these events occur.
( e ) After OPM allows a disability retirement application and the employee is separated, the application cannot be withdrawn. However, an individual entitled to a disability annuity may decline to accept all or any part of the annuity under the waiver provisions of 5 U.S.C. 8345(d) or request to be found medically recovered under § 831.1208(e) of this part.
### §10722. Purposes

The purposes of this subchapter include the following:

(1) To ensure that training is available for State, local, tribal and territorial law enforcement agencies and officers nationwide to support local efforts to identify, prevent, investigate, and prosecute cyber and financial crimes, including those crimes facilitated via computer networks and other electronic means, and crimes involving financial and economic impacts such as intellectual property crimes.

(2) To deliver training to State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement officers, and other criminal justice professionals concerning the use of proven methodologies to prevent, detect, and respond to such crimes, recognize emerging issues, manage electronic and financial crime evidence and to improve local criminal justice agency responses to such threats.

(3) To provide operational and technical assistance and training concerning tools, products, resources, guidelines, and procedures to aid and enhance criminal intelligence analysis, conduct cyber crime and financial crime investigations, and related justice information sharing at the local and State levels.

(4) To provide appropriate training on protections for privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties in the conduct of criminal intelligence analysis and cyber and electronic crime and financial crime investigations, including in the development of policies, guidelines, and procedures by State, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies to protect and enhance privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties protections and identify weaknesses and gaps in the protection of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3032, as added Pub. L. 115–76, §3(a), Nov. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 1248.)
P. 1


# RCRA Box 321 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 215)OGRC-S001 6 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 215of 259P. 2

PAUL . M . BOHANNO N

LAWYE R .40fX > N BK-

SPRIN G 6"i ' SUIT E il l MHOLf>NLi . 11*At > V 9 /U S 

### 0£«C - soo/ £

(9is ) eas-iao i •AX(BIS ) tma-o/« o


### Septembe r

18 , 199 0

Mr . Da n Derkic s Offic e o f Soli d wast e & Emergenc yRespons e specia l Wast e Managemen t Divisio n Mai l cod e 0S32 3 Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 1 M . Street , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2 046 0
Re : Wast e Crud e Oi l Reclaimer s Dea r Mr . Derkics : I hav e bee n th e coordinatin g lawye r i n th e wast e crud e oi l reclaimers ' efforts . M yaffiliatio n wit h Porte r & Clement s i s effectiv e Octobe r 1 , 1990 . I wante d t o provid e yo u a copyo f ou r informatio n a t th e earlies t possibl e date . I trus t i t wil l b e help
fu l i n sortin g throug hou r situation . Du e t o th e fac t tha t m yclient s ar e fromremot e area s i n Ne wMexic o an d Texas , the ywil l b e departin g fo r Midlan d Internationa l Airpor t a t 7:0 0 Mountain , 9:0 0 Eastern . I wil l d o m ybes t t o cal l yo u a t 8:0 0 sharp , o r shortl ythereafte r i f mor e convenien t fo r you . Ou r fligh t fo r Washingto n from Midlan d depart s a t 10:3 0 a.m . Wednesda y(today , b yth e tim e yo u rea d thi s letter) . I f Fridayi s bette r fo r you , jus t leav e a mes sag e wit hyou r secretary , o r visi t wit h m e earl ythi s morning . I kno wthi s ha s bee n a specia l effor t fo r yo u an d you r staff . Fo r th e mos t part , thes e reclaimer s ar e smal l busines s persons . The yappreciat e you r graciou sP. 3

Mr . Da nDerkic s Septembe r 18 , 199 0 Pag e -2 - willingnes s t o handl e thei r situatio no na nexpedited basis . Althoug

hther e ar e man

y othe r reclaimers , due t o the sor t tim

e fram e w e nevertheles s are pleasedt o presen t the entitie s liste di nthe document . I wil l loo

kforwar

dt o meetin

g an dvisitin

g wit h youan dyour staff .

VER YTRUL YYOURS ,

PAU L M . BOHANNO

N PMB/sy p
### §1523. General procedures; issuance and enforcement of orders; scope of authority; evidentiary matters

The Secretary or his delegate shall have the authority to issue and enforce orders during proceedings brought under this chapter. Such authority shall include the authority to issue subpenas, administer oaths, compel the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, papers, documents, and other evidence, to take depositions before any designated individual competent to administer oaths, and to examine witnesses.

(Pub. L. 93–627, §24, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2147.)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation 

Santa Monica, California 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-81698, No. 333-110744 and 333-115392, respectively) and Form S-8 (No. 333-70478, No. 333-96563, No. 333-104227 and No. 333-129528, respectively) of Anworth Mortgage AssetCorporation of our reports dated March 13, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also consent to the reference to us under the caption “Experts” in the Prospectus. 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 13,2006
#### Edith Stoll, Appellant, v. Robert E. Stoll, Defendant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

pu reqBoot ml opalour attartloa F+ondt 

tlwnl& a0 folforor 
Honorable L. F. hloKee, page 2 

aontraot, that is the exception of $(r,ooo.oo 

automatically guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporati0a.a 

Chapter 2, .Articles 2544, et seq., relating to 

county depositories and Chapter 3, Articles 25Wget seq., 

relating to city depositories, are found incorporated under Title 47 of Vernon's Annotated Revised Civil Statutes, 

1925~ By a very comprehensive Act passed in 1937, 45th 

Legislature, regular session, Chapter 484, the above mentioned statutes were amended. Under the provisions thereof, we find Article 2686 re-enacted and which provides 

that all provisions of the.Act shall apply to towns and 

villages incorporated under the general laws of Texas, as 

well as to cities so incorporated. 

Section 4 of said Act of 1937, found incorporated 

in the Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, as Articles 25GGa, 

reads as follows: 

*Notwithstanding any provisions of 

this Act requiring securities for deposits 

in the form of collateral, surety bond or 

in any other form, security for such deposits shall not be required to the extent 

said deposits are insured under the provisions of Section 12b of the Federal Reserve Aat as amende& or any amendments 

thereto." 

You will note that the above provisions of Article 

2666a expressly exempt such banks that are members or come 

within the provisions of Sec.12b of the Federal Reserve Act 

as amended, or any amendment thereto, from being required 

to maintain securities as collateral for the protection of 

county or city deposits to the extent of the deposits insured 

by said law. The anergency clause, under which the 1937 Act, 

45th Legislature, Chapter 484 was passed, expressly referred 

therein to the 1935 amendment to the Federal Reserve Act. 

An examination of the provisions of the 1935 amendment to the Federal Reserve Act discloses that Section 12b, 

as amended, set forth under Chapter 614, Acts of the 74th 

Congress, session one, as found in Vol.49 U.S.Statutes at large 

p.GS4,provides for the establishment of the Federal Doposit Insurance Corporation, an agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government. This Act provides that any State or National member bank 
APFPDJUN 24, 1939 

ATTORNEY CZRERAIAL Or TEX&t
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

          - [Docket No. APHIS-2018-0060]

# AGENCY:

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, we are giving notice that the Secretary of Agriculture intends to reestablish the National Wildlife Services Advisory Committee for a 2-year period. The Secretary has determined that the Committee is necessary and in the public interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Carrie Joyce, Designated Federal Officer, Wildlife Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 87, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851-3999.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the National Wildlife Services Advisory Committee (the Committee) is to advise the Secretary of Agriculture on policies, program issues, and research needed to conduct the Wildlife Services program. The Committee also serves as a public forum enabling those affected by the Wildlife Services program to have a voice in the program's policies.

Done in Washington, DC, this 19th day of December 2018.

Kevin Shea,

Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018-27943 Filed 12-21-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 01-065 May 29, 2001

 NRC SEEKS COMMENTS ON PROPOSED CHANGES

 TO MATERIAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTING REGULATIONS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking comments on proposed changes to its material

control and accounting regulations for nuclear power plants, fuel cycle facilities and other licensees that

possess 350 grams or more of special nuclear materials (uranium-233, enriched uranium, or plutonium).

The changes, which are designed to streamline the regulatory process and provide additional

flexibility to licensees, would amend the frequency and timing of reporting requirements for submitting

material balance and inventory composition reports. These changes would not affect efforts to fulfill

the requirements of the safeguards agreement between the United States and the International Atomic

Energy Agency.

Currently, licensees that possess 350 grams or more of special nuclear material are required to

file the two reports for the period ending March 31 and September 30 of each year. The proposed

changes would require licensees to file the reports only once each year, after 60 days of conducting a

physical inventory. 

The proposed amendments also would broaden the current exclusion from the requirement to

perform an environmental assessment before approving amendments to safeguards plans. The

exclusion would be made general enough to cover both approvals of safeguards plans and amendments

thereto. 

In addition, the proposed changes seek to develop safeguards risk-informed requirements for

certain types of facilities that are licensed to possess and use between one and five kilograms of

moderate to highly enriched special nuclear material. Currently, there is only one such facility in this

category, General Atomics Inc. of La Jolla, Calif., which is undergoing decommissioning. Some

requirements for these facilities currently are more restrictive than those for facilities licensed to possess

larger amounts and more highly enriched nuclear materials. The proposed changes would make

material control and accounting requirements more consistent with the safeguards risk posed by the

various types of facilities. 

The comment period will expire 75 days following publication of the proposed rule in the

Federal Register Notice, expected shortly. Comments should be submitted to:
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attn: Rulemakings

and Adjudications Staff. They can be delivered to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., between 7:30

a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays. Comments may also be sent electronically via the NRCís

interactive rulemaking web site, at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov . For information about the interactive

rulemaking web site, contact Carol Gallagher at 301-415-5905; e-mail CAG@nrc.gov .

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-149 November 18, 2003

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON LICENSE RENEWAL 

PROCESS FOR ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT 2

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Tuesday,

November 18, in Russellville, Arkansas, to discuss how the agency will review the application from

Entergy Operations, Inc. to renew the operating license for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2, near

Russellville. Members of the public are invited to ask questions and comment on license renewal

issues the NRC should consider in its review of the application.

The meeting will be held in the Nebo Room of the Holiday Inn at 2407 N. Arkansas Road

beginning at 7:00 p.m. The NRC staff will provide information on how the license renewal process

works and how the public can participate in this process. The NRC received the license renewal

application from Entergy Operations on October 15.

An electronic copy of the license renewal application is available on the NRC web site at this

address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/ano-2.html . In addition, copies

of the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 license renewal application are available at the Arkansas

Technical University’s library, 305 West Q St., Russellville, Arkansas.

###
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

Brick and Structural Clay Products

FROM: Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

DATE OF CONTACT: May 11, 2015

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED: 

Acme Brick Company

PERSON CONTACTED: 

Dr. Garth Tayler, Technical Director

817-870-8354

PURPOSE OF CONTACT:

To obtain additional information regarding green brick mercury testing results.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT: 

The Brick Industry Association (BIA) provided the EPA with a spreadsheet of mercury green 

brick testing results with the intent to add a mercury raw material variability factor to the 

Mercury MACT floor limit. In order to incorporate this raw material data, the EPA needed to 

know a little bit more about the general location of the clay deposits being used by the facilities:

-What is the clay deposit name being used by the facility?

-What is the geological age of the deposit? 

-Is the location of the facility approximately the same location as the deposit?

Mr. Tayler indicated that the Acme Brick Company could provide the additional information

regarding the deposit information in correlation to the green brick mercury testing results. 

Mr. Tayler was informed that a spreadsheet of the Acme Brick Company facilities that provided 

green brick testing results to EPA via BIA would be emailed to him to fill in the: Name of Clay 

Deposit, Geological Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit.
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




We, Rafi Amit, Chief Executive Officer of Camtek Ltd., and Mira Rosenzweig, Chief Financial Officer of Camtek Ltd., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report for Camtek Ltd. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Camtek Ltd.




Date:  June 7, 2010




By:  /s/Rafi AmitName: Rafi AmitTitle: Chief Executive OfficerBy: /s/ Mira RosenzweigName: Mira RosenzweigTitle: Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Camtek Ltd. and will be retained by Camtek Ltd. and furnished to the United States Securities And Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.3

         CONSENT OF REGISTERED INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO: Hesperia Holding, Inc.

As registered independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Hesperia Holding, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004 of our report dated February 9, 2005 and contained in the
Registration Statement No. 333-120687 of Hesperia Holding, Inc. Form SB-2 under
the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial
statements of Hesperia Holding, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.



                            /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                            --------------------------------------------
                            Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

McLean, Virginia
February 9, 2005
#### Dominick Salatino, Respondent, v. Josephine Saladino, etc., Appellant.

Order affirmed. No opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
**1501 Lee Highway** ▪ **Suite 180** ▪ **Arlington, Virginia 22209**

**www.mcbreenkopko.com** December 10 , 2014

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M

- 30

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Application of Compass Airlines , LLC for an Exemption (US

- Canada)

Docket OST

- 2014

- 02 20

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter will confirm that Compass Airlines, LLC has polled all carriers on the service list to

the above

- referenced Application filed on December 9 , 2014 and there are no objecti ons. 1

Please contact me with any with any questions.

Very truly yours,

Lisa A. Harig

Counsel for Compass Airlines, LLC

cc: Brett Kruger

1 We were unable to contact counsel for Evergr een International Airlines. We understand Evergreen is no longer

operating flights

, has filed for bankruptcy (Chapter 7)

, and is, therefore, unlikely to object to this Application

.