alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Mel Hooper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  issuer's  other  certifying   officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e)  for the  issuer  and  have:  (a)  Designed  such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure  controls and
procedures  to be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to ensure  that  material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being  prepared;  (b)  Evaluated  the  effectives of the
issuer's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  and presented in this report our
conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's  internal  control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant  deficiencies
and material  weaknesses  in the design or  operation  of internal  control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees
who have a  significant  role in the issuer's  internal  control over  financial
reporting.

/s/ Mel Hooper
-------------------------
/s/ Mel Hooper,  President
and acting Chief Financial Officer,
May 18, 2004
#### § 1820.9 Other rights and services.

This subpart does not create a right or entitlement for any individual to any service or to the release of any record other than those available under FOIA.
### §10. Headquarters of mine rescue cars; site for experimental work; leases and donations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to accept any suitable land or lands, buildings, or improvements that may be donated for the headquarters of mine rescue cars and construction of necessary railway sidings and housing for the same, or as the site of an experimental mine and plant for studying explosives, and to enter into leases for periods not exceeding ten years, subject to annual appropriations by Congress.

(June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 912; Ex. Ord. No. 6611, Feb. 22, 1934.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1 of this title.
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.210 What are weights? ( a ) A weight is the relative importance or share of a subpart of a group compared with the total for the group. A weight is frequently expressed as a percentage. For example, in a pie chart, each wedge has a percentage that represents its relative importance or the size of the wedge compared with the whole pie.
( b ) OPM uses two kinds of weights: Consumer expenditure weights and employment weights. ( 1 ) *Consumer expenditure weights.* The consumer expenditure weight for a category of expenditures (e.g., Food) is the relative importance or share (often expressed as a percentage) of that category in terms of total consumer expenditures. OPM derives consumer expenditure weights from the tabulated results of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES).
( 2 ) *Employment weights.* The employment weight is the relative employment population of the survey area compared with the employment population of the COLA area as a whole. OPM uses the number of General Schedule employees in the survey area to compute employment weights. OPM uses these employment weights as described in § 591.216(b).
### §12242. Definitions

In this part—

"child" means a person who is less than 7 years of age.

"community correctional facility" means a residential facility that—

(A) is used only for eligible offenders and their children under 7 years of age;

(B) is not within the confines of a jail or prison;

(C) houses no more than 50 prisoners in addition to their children; and

(D) provides to inmates and their children—

(i) a safe, stable, environment for children;

(ii) pediatric and adult medical care consistent with medical standards for correctional facilities;

(iii) programs to improve the stability of the parent-child relationship, including educating parents regarding—

(I) child development; and

(II) household management;

(iv) alcoholism and drug addiction treatment for prisoners; and

(v) programs and support services to help inmates—

(I) to improve and maintain mental and physical health, including access to counseling;

(II) to obtain adequate housing upon release from State incarceration;

(III) to obtain suitable education, employment, or training for employment; and

(IV) to obtain suitable child care.

"eligible offender" means a primary caretaker parent who—

(A) has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not more than 7 years or is awaiting sentencing for a conviction punishable by such a term of imprisonment; and

(B) has not engaged in conduct that—

(i) knowingly resulted in death or serious bodily injury;

(ii) is a felony for a crime of violence against a person; or

(iii) constitutes child neglect or mental, physical, or sexual abuse of a child.

"primary caretaker parent" means—

(A) a parent who has consistently assumed responsibility for the housing, health, and safety of a child prior to incarceration; or

(B) a woman who has given birth to a child after or while awaiting her sentencing hearing and who expresses a willingness to assume responsibility for the housing, health, and safety of that child,

a parent who, in the best interest of a child, has arranged for the temporary care of the child in the home of a relative or other responsible adult shall not for that reason be excluded from the category "primary caretaker".

"State" means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31903, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1893.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13882 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
% Gender neutral or male specific values, except for female BTW and fat available

% Set sex=1 to access female parameters

SPECIES=1; SEX=0; PREG=0; GDSTART=1; PAFC=1;

%BWT and Volume fat specific to women % Gompertz BWT Parameters (Luecke 2007) % set Female BWT Parameters B1=3.4;B2=2.07402;B3=1.504154;B5=34.8806;B6=0.2120837;B7=0.443786; B4=2.672665;B8=0.31127; AGE1=2.949004;AGE2=11;AGE3=21.86533; BWSW=1; %Switch for age (set =0) or set (set =1) determination of BW BWST=68; %Set value of BW (kg) Np=68, 1ST TRIMESTER=74, 3RD TRIMESTER=77 % set Female VFCb VF6=-1.273e-30;VF5=7.249e-25;VF4=-1.558e-19;VF3=1.540e-14;VF2=-6.787e-10; VF1=1.401e-05;VF0=9.217e-02;

% Constant organ volumes VBMC=0.021; % Brown 1997 (red only, yellow is in adipose) VDC=0.0003; VPC=0.00148; % Young 2009, Brown 1997 VINTC=0.0091; % Just small intestine (Brown 1997)

% HCT HCTN=0.40; % 0.43 women, 0.47 men (Bresarb 1998); 40 from Abdjljalil et al

% Partitioning Coef. (Lowe 2009) % CPF PPLA=83; %PLACENTA =1/3 fat - placenta/fetus could include some bound CPF? PAFC=19; % CPF-oxon PPLAO=11.2; %PLACENTA =2xrapid VVOL=0.075; %ml/hr urine production in women

start @nocallback
SCPW-14-0000452
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

EILEEN SHAVELSON, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE RANDAL G.B. VALENCIANO, JUDGE OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT, THE HONORABLE CRAIG H. NAKAMURA, and THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE M. REIFURTH, JUDGES OF THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civil No. 13-1-0137)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Eileen Shavelson’s motion for reconsideration of the March 19, 2014 order denying her petition for a writ of mandamus, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 13, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-14-0000452 13-OCT-2014 09:26 AM
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Leroy Halterman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Leroy Halterman


Leroy Halterman


President, Secretary & Treasurer


(principal executive and financial officer)







Date:  September 18, 2009
#### Moritz Roth, Appellant, v. Galva State Bank et al., Appellees.

Gen. No. 5,876.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. Fbank D. Ramsay, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Bill by Moritz Both against Galva State Bank, Olof C. Anderson, Selma Anderson, S. P. Samuels on and Charles C. Wilson, executor of the last will and testament of Charles C. Wilson, deceased, to have reviewed, reversed and set aside a certain deficiency decree entered against the complainant in a foreclosure proceeding, wherein the Galva State Bank was complainant and the said Andersons, Both and Wilson were defendants. The Galva State Bank demurred to the bill and the demurrer was sustained and the bill of review dismissed. Prom the decree, complainant appeals.

James H. Andrews and Nels P. Anderson, for appellant.

Albert E. Bergland, for appellees.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney

delivered the opinion of the court.

*237Abstract of the Decision.

1. Mortgages, § *645*
      ***
      *—when hill of review to set aside a deficiency decree properly dismissed.*A deficiency decree in a foreclosure proceeding was entered against a grantee of the mortgaged premises, who assumed the mortgage, and such grantee filed a hill to review the decree claiming that no deficiency decree could he entered against him in chancery for the reason that he did not own the premises when the bill for foreclosure was filed, and that he was not a proper party defendant to the hill in the absence of such an allegation. *Held*that the bill for review was properly dismissed for the reason that he had a complete remedy in the foreclosure proceeding if his contention was correct, first, by demurring to the foreclosure hill; second, by appealing from the deficiency decree entered against him; or third, by taking a writ of error and reviewing the whole proceeding for failure to find his ownership of the land, it also appearing that he could have answered the original bill setting up his conveyance, and it further appearing that he still had a right to prosecute a writ of error from the entire proceeding.

2. Mortgages, § *635*
      ***
      *—against whom a deficiency decree may he entered.*Where a grantee of mortgaged premises assumed the mortgage and later conveyed the premises to another before bill for foreclosure was filed, *held*that he was a proper party defendant to a bill for foreclosure and that a deficiency decree could be entered against him.

3. Equity, § *554*
      ***
      *—when hill is a hill of review and also in the nature of a hill of review.*Where complainant in a bill to review a deficiency decree against him in a foreclosure proceeding alleged as an affirmative fact, not appearing in the record sought to be reviewed, that before the hill for foreclosure was filed he had conveyed the mortgaged premises to another, *held*that the bill was a bill for review and also a bill in the nature of a bill of review.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1928

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the eligibility of 

certain expenses for the low-income housing credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut (for herself and Mr. RANGEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the eligibility of certain expenses for the low-income 

housing credit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN EXPENSES FOR LOW4 INCOME HOUSING CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 42 of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to low-income 

7 housing credit) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(8) ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS IN10 CLUDED IN BASIS.—
2

•HR 1928 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Solely for purposes of 

2 this section, associated development costs shall 

3 be taken into account in determining the basis 

4 of any building which is part of a low-income 

5 housing project to the extent not otherwise so 

6 taken into account. 

7 ‘‘(B) ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT

8 COSTS.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the 

9 term ‘associated development costs’ means, with 

10 respect to any building, such building’s allo11 cable share of—

12 ‘‘(i) any cost incurred in preparing 

13 the site which is reasonably related to the 

14 development of the qualified low-income 

15 housing project of which the building is a 

16 part, 

17 ‘‘(ii) any fee imposed by a State or 

18 local government as a condition to develop19 ment of such project, 

20 ‘‘(iii) any reasonable fee paid to any 

21 developer of such project, 

22 ‘‘(iv) any professional fee relating to 

23 any item includible in the basis of the 

24 building pursuant to this paragraph, and 
3

•HR 1928 IH 

1 ‘‘(v) any cost of financing attributable 

2 to construction of the building (without re3 gard to the source of such financing) which 

4 is required to be capitalized.’’

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall apply to—

7 (1) housing credit dollar amounts allocated 

8 after December 31, 2003, and 

9 (2) buildings placed in service after such date 

10 to the extent paragraph (1) of section 42(h) of the 

11 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 does not apply to 

12 any building by reason of paragraph (4) thereof, but 

13 only with respect to bonds issued after such date.

Æ
Exhibit 10.18


 


Amendment
to Lease


 


This Amendment to Lease dated
this 1st day of September, 1995 shall amend the terms of a lease
dated February 3, 1993 (“Lease”) by and between Jaytee Properties (“Landlord”)
and Republic Bank & Trust Company (“Tenant”) and any other amendments to
such lease.


 


Landlord and Tenant agree that
the following terms of the Lease shall be amended specifically adding 8,000
square feet of lower level space to the leased Premises at $11 per square foot
which by previous arrangement was leased to Tenant for 18 months rent free.


 


ARTICLE I.   PREMISES


 


SECTION 1.   Tenant leases from Landlord and Landlord
leases to Tenant the following premises (hereinafter called the “Premises”):


 


Being 13,000 square feet of office space located on
the first floor and lower level in the Republic Bank Building (hereinafter
called “the Building”) located at Hurstbourne Parkway and Stone Creek Parkway
in Jefferson County, Kentucky.  Tenant’s
retail banking operation shall be limited to 5,000 square feet on the first
floor as such space is the only location available for purposes other than
office use.


 


ARTICLE III.  
RENT AND OPERATING EXPENSES


 


SECTION 1.  
Tenant shall pay to Landlord, at Landlord’s office in the Building or at
such place as Landlord may from time to time designate, as rental for the
Premises, the sum of $14,416.66 (the “Rent”). 
Rent shall be payable in advance on the first day of each calendar month
beginning September 1, 1995 for the remaining term of the lease.


 


 


	
  JAYTEE
  PROPERTIES

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  BY:

  	
   

  	
  \s\ Steve Trager

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  REPUBLIC BANK
  & TRUST COMPANY

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  BY:

  	
   

  	
  \s\ Lee Kinsolving

  	
   

  	
   

  
						



 


91
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard

          - 33 CFR Part 117
          - [CGD01-04-132]

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

# SUMMARY:

The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations for the Metropolitan Avenue Bridge, mile 3.4, across English Kills at New York City, New York. Under this temporary deviation the bridge may remain closed from 6 a.m. to midnight on the following days: November 10 through November 12; November 17 through November 19; November 22 through November 24; and December 1 through December 3, 2004. The temporary deviation is necessary to facilitate bridge maintenance.

# DATES:

This deviation is effective from November 10, 2004, through December 3, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7195.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Metropolitan Avenue Bridge has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 10 feet at mean high water and 15 feet at mean low water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.801(e).

The owner of the bridge, New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), requested a temporary deviation from the drawbridge operation regulations to facilitate rehabilitation repairs at the bridge. The bridge must remain in the closed position to perform these repairs.

Under this temporary deviation the NYCDOT Metropolitan Avenue Bridge may remain in the closed position from 6 a.m. through midnight on the following days: November 10 through November 12; November 17 through November 19; November 22 through November 24; and December 1 through December 3, 2004.

This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35, and will be performed with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as soon as possible.

Dated: October 30, 2004.

David P. Pekoske,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, First Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 04-24971 Filed 11-8-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64800-64801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24816]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3642]


Commonwealth of Virginia; Amendment <greek-i>2

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
September 30, 2004, the above

[[Page 64801]]

numbered declaration is hereby amended to establish the incident period 
for this disaster as beginning September 27, 2004, and continuing 
through September 30, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is December 17, 2004 and for 
economic injury the deadline is July 18, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: November 1, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-24816 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P