alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016341EN.01005901.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/59

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 161/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2196]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/14 of 5 January 2015 amending Decision 2012/88/EU on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystems of the trans-European rail system (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/14 of 5 January 2015 amending Decision 2012/88/EU on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystems of the trans-European rail system (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 37i (Commission Decision 2012/88/EU) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 D 0014: Commission Decision (EU) 2015/14 of 5 January 2015 (OJ L 3, 7.1.2015, p. 44).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 D 0014: Commission Decision (EU) 2015/14 of 5 January 2015 (OJ L 3, 7.1.2015, p. 44).’

Article 2

The texts of Decision (EU) 2015/14 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 3, 7.1.2015, p. 44.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
B.C.D. 03-5 JAN 1 5 2003

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

St. Marys Railroad Company 

Durango Railroad Corporation

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the status of Durango Railroad Corporation and the continuing status

of St. Marys Railroad Company (SMR), B.A. No. 3557, as employers

under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231, et seg.) (RRA) and

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et seg.)

(RUIA). SMR was ruled to be an employer under the RRA and RUIA 

effective January 11, 1924.

According to Mr. Herbert Baez, the president and CEO of SMR, the

railroad was merged into Gilman Paper Company on January 11, 1999.

The surviving corporation was Gilman Paper Company. At the same

time, Gilman set up a St. Marys Railroad, LLC and transferred all of

the assets of St. Marys Railroad Company to St. Marys Railroad LLC.

On December 17, 1999, St. Marys Railroad LLC was sold to Durango

Paper Company. On January 18, 2000, Durango set up a new

corporation, Durango Railroad Corporation. Since the creation of

Durango Railroad Corporation, all the operations of St. Marys Railroad,

LLC have been conducted under the name of Durango Railroad

Corporation. The operations of St. Marys have not changed but it is

now known as Durango Railroad Company d/b/a St. Marys Railroad

Company. Reports are being filed by Durango Railroad Company. The

last compensation to employees was paid by St. Marys Railroad

Company on March 31, 2000.1

In view of the foregoing, it is the determination of the Railroad

Retirement Board that the St. Marys Railroad Company ceased being

an employer under the RRA and RUIA effective March 31, 2000, the

last date its employees were compensated.

1 St. Marys reported the compensation and service of its employees through the first quarter of 2002.

Thereafter, reports are being filed by Durango Railroad Corporation.

BA#5588
St. Marys Railroad Company

Durango Railroad Corporation

In addition, the evidence of record establishes that Durango Railroad 

Corporation is a rail carrier operating in interstate commerce.

Accordingly, it is determined that Durango Railroad Corporation 

became an employer within the meaning of section l(a)(l)(i) of the

Railroad Retirement Act and the corresponding provision of the

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act effective April 1, 2000, the date

its employees were first compensated. [CF. Rev. Rul. 82-100, 1982-1

C.B. 155, wherein the IRS held that a company became an employer

under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act on the date it hired employees

to perform functions directly related to its carrier operations.]

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
No. I-07-049 

Contact: Diane Screnci 610/337-5330 

 Neil Sheehan 610/337-5331 

September 20, 2007

NRC SENDS TEAM TO REVIEW PEACH BOTTOM SECURITY 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a team of inspectors to conduct a special 

security inspection at the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant in Delta, Pa. The team, called an 

Augmented Inspection Team (AIT), will arrive on site tomorrow to begin its work. The plant is 

operated by Exelon Nuclear. 

The NRC is aware of information that security officers may have been inattentive while 

on duty at Peach Bottom. The company is conducting its own investigation into this information. 

An AIT is formed to review the circumstances surrounding more significant issues at 

NRC-licensed facilities. This five-member team includes specialists from the agency’s Region I 

office in King of Prussia, Pa., and from its headquarters in Rockville, Md. The inspectors are 

expected to spend at least a week at the site before returning to the regional office where the 

information they have gathered will be analyzed and evaluated. 

“The inspection team will comprehensively assess the Peach Bottom security issues to 

confirm that the security program is being effectively implemented. It will also assess Exelon’s 

actions in response to this information,” NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins said. 

“Our NRC Resident Inspectors have been monitoring the situation and we continue to believe the 

site is secure.” 

A report will be issued within 30 days of the close of the inspection. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I 

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406 

E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of First  Security  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, R.
Douglas  Hutcherson,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 24, 2004            Signature /s/ R. Douglas Hutcherson
                                           -------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Addendum to Non qualified Stock Option Agreement Dated February 27, 2002



Exhibit 10.67










Addendum to Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement Dated
February 27, 2002


Pursuant to Section 13 of the agreement between UAL Corporation
(the "Company") and Peter D. McDonald (the "Employee) dated February 27,
2002 regarding the grant of a non-qualified stock option under the 2000
Incentive Stock Plan of UAL Corporation (the "Agreement"), effective as
of the date of grant, the number of shares granted under the Agreement
is reduced from Eighty-Two Thousand Six Hundred Fifty (82,650) shares to
zero (0) shares.

 

 

	UAL CORPORATION
	 
	By /s/ Glenn F. Tilton
	Chairman, President and
	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	ACCEPTED:
	 
	/s/ Peter D. McDonald
	Peter D. McDonald
Kodiak
Energy, Inc.





EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.








Dated:
March 31, 2010


/s/ William S.
Tighe


Name:
William S. Tighe


Title:
Chief Executive Officer











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-19T08:21:08-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1898.

#### Willard *v.*Sullivan.

The extent to which a cross-examination upon collateral issues shall be permitted for the purpose of testing the memory of a witness is a question of fact for the trial term.

Testimony educed upon a cross-examination as to immaterial issues is not open to contradiction.

Assumpsit, to recover upon a special promise by the owner to pay the past and future bills of a sub-contractor. Facts found by the court.

One Beaudry, the principal contractor, was asked -what the final result of his contract with the owner was,— whether the house cost more or less than the contract price. The plaintiff objected on the ground that it was immaterial. The defendant’s counsel asked the privilege of inquiring along that line for the purpose of testing the memory of the witness, and was permitted to do so to a considerable extent. The court then ruled that he had inquired sufficiently for this purpose, and the defendant excepted.

The defendant offered to show that he had paid Beaudry in full. The court ruled that the evidence was immaterial. The defendant then offered the evidence to contradict Beaudry’s statements which had been received in evidence for the purpose of testing his credibility, as above stated. The evidence was excluded, and the defendant excepted.

*Wason Jackson,*for the plaintiff

*Bertis A. Pease*and *Henry B. Atherton,*for the defendant.

Blodgett, C. J.

How far justice required the inquiries to Beaudry, upon the immaterial point whether the house cost more *492■or less than the contract price, should be allowed to go for the purpose of testing his memory, was a question of fact to be determined at the trial *(Spalding*v. Merrimack, 67 N. H. 382, 383; *Baldwin v. Wentworth,*67 N. H. 408, 409); and his statements so made were not open to contradiction upon the other immaterial point as to whether he had been fully paid by the defendant for building the house. *Sumner*v. *Crawford,*45 N. H. 416, 418; *Dewey*v. *Williams,*43 N. H. 384, 386; *Hersom*v. *Henderson,*23 N. H. 498, 506, 507.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 837.804 Finality of elections under this subpart.

Except as otherwise provided by this subpart, an election of coverage under, or annuity from, another retirement system, in lieu of CSRS or FERS coverage or annuity, or the election between simultaneous entitlements under CSRS or FERS, is final and conclusive for the period of simultaneous entitlement to coverage or annuity.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Louis Mainieri, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

All concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-31183 Conference Calendar

GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES A. FUSELIER, Individually and in his official capacity; TODD LOUVIERE, Warden, Individually and in his official capacity; MAJORIE ALLEMOND, Individually and in her official capacity; SAMONE ALEX, Individually and in her official capacity; KEW LEDET, Individually and in his official capacity; R. JENKINS, Individually and in his official capacity; DONNA BROUSSARD, Individually and in her official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-579

-------------------- June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) detainee Ghulam Mohammed Nasim (# 57187) moves this court for appointment of appellate counsel. The motion is DENIED. Nasim appeals thedistrict court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as timebarred, but he implicitly concedes that his complaint was not filed within the applicable one-year limitation period. SeeNo. 99-31183 -2- Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 243-48 (1989); Elzy v. Roberson , 868 F.2d 793, 794-95 (5th Cir. 1989); L A . C IV . C ODE A NN . art. 3492 (West 2000). We find no merit to Nasim’s argument that his claims should be deemed to relate back to a prior lawsuit. Accordingly, the dismissal of the complaint is AFFIRMED. AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR COUNSEL DENIED. MOTION TO STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT IS MOOT IN LIGHT OF THE OPINION.
§ 7401.101 General. ( a ) *Purpose.* In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to employees of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635.
( b ) *Cross-references.* In addition to 5 CFR part 2635 and this part, MSPB employees are required to comply with implementing guidance and procedures issued by the MSPB in accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105(c). MSPB employees are also subject to the regulations concerning executive branch financial disclosure contained in 5 CFR part 2634, the regulations concerning executive branch financial interests contained in 5 CFR part 2640, and the regulations concerning executive branch employee responsibilities and conduct contained in 5 CFR part 735.
# L_2019192EN.01005701.xml

| 18.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/57

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 102/2019

of 11 April 2019

amending Annex IX (Financial Services) to the EEA Agreement [2019/1232]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/544 of 3 April 2019 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2031 determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is equivalent, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/544 of 3 April 2019 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2031 determining, for a limited period of time, that the regulatory framework applicable to central counterparties in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is equivalent, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 31bcaw (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/2031) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32019 D 0544: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/544 of 3 April 2019 (OJ L 95, 4.4.2019, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32019 D 0544: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/544 of 3 April 2019 (OJ L 95, 4.4.2019, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/544 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 April 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 April 2019.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 95, 4.4.2019, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §10516. Reports

Each State or unit of local government which receives a grant under this subchapter shall submit to the Attorney General, for each year in which funds from a grant received under this subchapter is expended, a report at such time and in such manner as the Attorney General may reasonably require which contains—

(1) a summary of the activities carried out under the grant and an assessment of whether such activities are meeting the needs identified in the application submitted under section 10512 of this title; and

(2) such other information as the Attorney General may require.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2406, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title XXI, §210302(c)(1)(C), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2067; amended Pub. L. 112–189, §2(a), Oct. 5, 2012, 126 Stat. 1435.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796kk–5 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2012—Pub. L. 112–189 struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "Reports to Attorney General" before "Each State" and struck out subsec. (b) which required the Attorney General to submit reports to Congress on grant amounts and activities.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0112 - Staff Evaluation and Proposed Revision to the Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process to Address Radioactive Liquid Spills and Leaks

Accession Number: ML071910166

Date Released: Monday, July 23, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML071010582 - Excerpt from Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix D Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process. (4 page(s), 4/11/2007)
    - ML070790598 - SECY-07-0112 - Staff Evaluation and Proposed Revision to the Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process to Address Radioactive Liquid Spills and Leaks (6 page(s), 7/6/2007)
    - ML071550286 - SECY-07-0112 Enclosure 2:  Excerpt from Inspection Manual Chapter 0308, Attachment 3, Appendix D Technical Basis for Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process (3 page(s), 7/6/2007)
    - ML071010597 - SECY-07-0112 Enclosure 3:  Draft Public Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process Flowchart (2 page(s), 7/6/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
# L_2017161EN.01000401.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/4

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 235/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex I (Veterinary and phytosanitary matters) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1024]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/919 of 12 June 2015 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the lists of border inspection posts and veterinary units in Traces (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/919 of 12 June 2015 amending Decision 2009/821/EC as regards the lists of border inspection posts and veterinary units in Traces (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

This Decision concerns legislation regarding veterinary matters. Legislation regarding veterinary matters shall not apply to Liechtenstein as long as the application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products is extended to Liechtenstein, as specified in the sectoral adaptations to Annex I to the EEA Agreement. This Decision is therefore not to apply to Liechtenstein.

| (3) | Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 39 (Commission Decision 2009/821/EC) in Part 1.2 of Chapter I of Annex I to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 D 0919: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/919 of 12 June 2015 (OJ L 149, 16.6.2015, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 D 0919: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/919 of 12 June 2015 (OJ L 149, 16.6.2015, p. 15).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/919 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 149, 16.6.2015, p. 15.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---