alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1715

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enhance the authority of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs to recover from third parties costs of 

medical care furnished to veterans and other persons by the Department. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. EVANS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enhance the 

authority of the Department of Veterans Affairs to recover from third parties costs of medical care furnished 

to veterans and other persons by the Department.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RECOVERY BY THE DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS OF COSTS OF CERTAIN 

5 HEALTH CARE SERVICES. 

6 (a) SCOPE OF RECOVERY AUTHORITY.—Subsection 

7 (i) of section 1729 of title 38, United States Code, is 

8 amended—
2

•HR 1715 IH 

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking clause (i) 

2 and redesignating clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv) as 

3 clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (3)—

5 (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) 

6 through (D) as subparagraphs (B) through (E), 

7 respectively; and 

8 (B) by inserting before subparagraph (B), 

9 as so redesignated, the following new subpara10 graph (A): 

11 ‘‘(A) a department or agency of the United 

12 States other than the Department;’’. 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Subsection (a)(1) 

14 of such section is amended—

15 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘if’’; 

16 (2) by inserting ‘‘, or (B) the person had in17 curred a legal liability to pay for such care or serv18 ices’’ before the period; and 

19 (3) by inserting at the end the following new 

20 sentence: ‘‘The preceding sentence applies notwith21 standing any other provision of law, other than a 

22 law enacted after the date of the enactment of this 

23 sentence that is expressly stated as an exception or 

24 limitation to this section.’’. 
3

•HR 1715 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply only with respect to care and serv3 ices furnished under chapter 17 of title 38, United States 

4 Code, on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 351.802 Content of notice. ( a ) ( 1 ) The action to be taken, the reasons for the action, and its effective date;
( 2 ) The employee's competitive area, competitive level, subgroup, service date, and three most recent ratings of record received during the last 4 years;
( 3 ) The place where the employee may inspect the regulations and record pertinent to this case;
( 4 ) The reasons for retaining a lower-standing employee in the same competitive level under § 351.607 or § 351.608;
( 5 ) Information on reemployment rights, except as permitted by § 351.803(a); and
( 6 ) The employee's right, as applicable, to appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under the provisions of the Board's regulations or to grieve under a negotiated grievance procedure. The agency shall also comply with § 1201.21 of this title.
( b ) When an agency issues an employee a notice, the agency must, upon the employee's request, provide the employee with a copy of OPM's retention regulations found in part 351 of this chapter.
[60 FR 2678, Jan. 11, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 44254, Aug. 25, 1995; 62 FR 62502, Nov. 24, 1997; 63 FR 32595, June 15, 1998]
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.804 Maximum period of entitlement to reemployment.

Entitlement to reemployment terminates at the end of 6 years and 30 days, following the date employment commences in the Institute unless exercised or otherwise terminated before that time as provided in this subpart.
EXHIBIT 32-1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Hesperia  Holding,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2002, as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),    I,    Mark    Presgraves,   Chief   Financial    Officer    and
Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.




                              Mark Presgraves
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              and Secretary/Treasurer
                              August 27, 2003
### §467g. Research

#### (a) In general

The Administrator, in cooperation with the Board, shall carry out a program of technical and archival research to develop and support—

(1) improved techniques, historical experience, and equipment for rapid and effective dam construction, rehabilitation, and inspection;

(2) devices for the continued monitoring of the safety of dams;

(3) development and maintenance of information resources systems needed to support managing the safety of dams; and

(4) initiatives to guide the formulation of effective public policy and advance improvements in dam safety engineering, security, and management.

#### (b) Consultation

The Administrator shall provide for State participation in research under subsection (a) and periodically advise all States and Congress of the results of the research.

(Pub. L. 92–367, §9, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(8), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3692; amended Pub. L. 107–310, §4, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2453; Pub. L. 113–121, title III, §3001(a)(1), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 467g, Pub. L. 92–367, §8, as added Pub. L. 99–662, title XII, §1201(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4261, set out the requisite features of State dam safety programs and provided for program approval and periodic review, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3685.

A prior section 9 of Pub. L. 92–367 was classified to section 467h of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–121 substituted "Administrator" for "Director" in introductory provisions of subsec. (a) and in subsec. (b).

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–310, §4(1), in introductory provisions, substituted "in cooperation with the Board" for "in cooperation with ICODS" and inserted "and support" after "develop".

Subsec. (a)(3), (4). Pub. L. 107–310, §4(2)–(4), added pars. (3) and (4).
### **CHAPTER 303—PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION**

Sec.
30301.
Findings.
30302.
Purposes.
30303.
National prison rape statistics, data, and research.
30304.
Prison rape prevention and prosecution.
30305.
Grants to protect inmates and safeguard communities.
30306.
National Prison Rape Elimination Commission.
30307.
Adoption and effect of national standards.
30308.
Requirement that accreditation organizations adopt accreditation standards.
30309.
Definitions.
GAO-01-904R Legion of Valor of the United States of America, Inc.

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

June 26, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Legion of Valor of the United States of America,

Incorporated, for Fiscal Year 2000

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Legion of Valor of the United States of America, Incorporated, a federally chartered

corporation, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2000. The corporation’s purposes

include remembering the deeds of individuals who were awarded the Congressional

Medal of Honor, the Distinguished Service Cross, the Air Force Cross, and the Navy

Cross, and to advance the best interests of members of the armed forces of the

United States of America.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers.
Page 2 GAO-01-904R Legion of Valor of the United States of America, Inc.

The auditor noted that the statement for the Legion of Valor Museum was not

audited. The Legion of Valor Museum represents a significant portion of the financial

activity for the Legion of Valor--over 50 percent of the reported revenues and

expenses. Other than the above, our review disclosed no instances of

noncompliance. Management of the Legion of Valor has agreed to have a financial

audit covering the Legion of Valor’s financial statements as a whole in the future as

required under 36 U.S.C. 10101. We are returning the audit report you sent with your

letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(194044)
### §2289a. Consideration of measures

#### (a) Definitions

In this section, the following definitions apply:

#### (1) Natural feature

The term "natural feature" means a feature that is created through the action of physical, geological, biological, and chemical processes over time.

#### (2) Nature-based feature

The term "nature-based feature" means a feature that is created by human design, engineering, and construction to provide risk reduction by acting in concert with natural processes.

#### (b) Requirement

In studying the feasibility of projects for flood risk management, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and ecosystem restoration the Secretary shall, with the consent of the non-Federal sponsor of the feasibility study, consider, as appropriate—

(1) natural features;

(2) nature-based features;

(3) nonstructural measures; and

(4) structural measures.

#### (c) Report to Congress

#### (1) In general

Not later than February 1, 2020, and 5 and 10 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of subsection (b).

#### (2) Contents

The report under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(A) A description of guidance or instructions issued, and other measures taken, by the Secretary and the Chief of Engineers to implement subsection (b).

(B) An assessment of the costs, benefits, impacts, and trade-offs associated with measures recommended by the Secretary for coastal risk reduction and the effectiveness of those measures.

(C) A description of any statutory, fiscal, or regulatory barriers to the appropriate consideration and use of a full array of measures for coastal risk reduction.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1184, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1679; Pub. L. 115–270, title I, §1149(b), Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3787.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 115–270 struck out "in coastal areas" after "risk reduction".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 114–322, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6739

JAMES PHILLIP MEGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; RICK JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (3:06-cv-00061)

Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Phillip Meggs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Phillip Meggs appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Meggs v.

North Carolina, No. 3:06-cv-00061 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 511.614 Review by the Director. The Director may, at his or her discretion, reopen and reconsider any decision when written argument or evidence is submitted which tends to establish that: ( a ) The previous decision involves an erroneous interpretation of law or regulation, or a misapplication of established policy:
( b ) The previous decision is of a precedential nature involving a new or unreviewed policy consideration that may have effects beyond the actual case at hand, or is otherwise of such an exceptional nature as to merit the personal attention of the Director.
§ 734.104 Restriction of political activity. No further proscriptions or restrictions may be imposed upon employees covered under this regulation except: ( a ) Employees who are appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
( b ) Employees who are appointed by the President;
( c ) Non-career senior executive service members;
( d ) Schedule C employees, 5 CFR 213.3301, 213.3302; and
( e ) Any other employees who serve at the pleasure of the President.
§ 316.902 Eligibility. A post-secondary student means an individual who: ( a ) Is enrolled or accepted for enrollment in an institution of higher education as defined by the Higher Education Act of 1965, in a section codified at 20 U.S.C.1001(a); and
( b ) Is pursuing a baccalaureate or graduate degree on at least a part-time basis, as determined by the institution of higher education; and
( c ) Meets the minimum qualification standards prescribed or approved by OPM for the position to which the individual is being appointed.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Finger Lakes Bancorp, Incl:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
No. 333-63404 on Form S-8 of Finger Lakes Bancorp, Inc. of our reported dated
January 15, 2002, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of Finger Lakes Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001
and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Finger Lakes Bancorp, Inc.



                                   /s/ KPMG LLP
                                   ---------------------------


March 26, 2002
Syracuse, New York
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mary F. Flaherty, Appellant, against John F. McNeill, as Superintendent of the Matteawan State Hospital for the Criminal Insane, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
#### § 7.2 Reemployment rights.

OPM, whenever it determines it to be necessary, shall prescribe regulations governing the release of employees (both within the competitive service and the excepted service) by any agency in the executive branch of the Government for employment in any other agency, and governing the establishment, granting, and exercise of rights to reemployment in the agencies from which employees are released.

[28 FR 10025, Sept. 14, 1963. Redesignated by E.O. 13197, 66 FR 7853, Jan. 25, 2001]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Eduardo Avila, Chief Financial Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc. for the period ended May 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tortuga Mexican Imports, Inc.

Dated: July 21, 2006

/s/ Eduardo AvilaEduardo Avila
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
D-08~0B-DKG-1 1 06/02/10 

## EPA Defect Reporting Database
Interactive Defect Report Campaign Number: 

## D-08~0B-DKG-1

Problem: defective/incorrect OBD System California only ? Yes / No MIL illumination ? Yes / No Description of the Defect Due to a data error in the OBDII software of the DKG transmission, the freeze frame data corresponding to stored DGK transmission faul t codes will be erased with shut down of the DKG control unit. Impact on Emissions No emissions impact. Drivability Problems Drivability is not affected. How was the defect determined? During BMW internal testing. Available Emissions Data n.a. Address of Plants BMW AG, Plant 1.1 Petuelring 130 80788 Munich, Germany BMW AG, Plant 6.1 Herbert-Quant-Allee 93055 Regensburg, Germany

Anticipated Follow-up BMW is planning to implement an improved software on all affected vehicles in the field at next service. EPA DR #4055 Received: June 23, 2010D-08~0B-DKG-1 2 06/02/10 Notes Engine Family affected means Year Test Group Make Models vehicles determined 2008 8BMXV04.0S65 BMW M3, M3 Coupe, M3 Conv. 2248 by production records (only models with DKG transmission and production between 03/08 – 08/08) 2009 9BMXV04.0S65 BMW M3, M3 Coupe, M3 Conv. 2764 by production records (only models with DKG transmission) 2010 ABMXV04.0S65 BMW M3, M3 Coupe, M3 Conv. 1471 by production records (only models with DKG transmission) 2011 BBMXV04.0S65 BMW M3, M3 Coupe, M3 Conv. 1418 by production records (only models with DKG transmission and production between 03/10 – 08/10)

2009 9BMXV03.054R BMW Z4 sDrive 35i 1397 by production records (only models with DKG transmission) 2010 ABMXV03.054R BMW Z4 sDrive 35i 359 by production records (only models with DKG transmission) 2011 BBMXV03.0ULR BMW 335CiM, 335Ci Conv.M 1411 by production records (only models with DKG transmission and production between 03/10 – 08/10) 2011 BBMXV03.054R BMW Z4 sDrive 35i, Z4 sDrive 35is 592 by production records (only models with DKG transmission and production between 03/10 – 08/10) 2011 BBMXJ03.0N55 BMW 135i, 135i Conv. 1722 by production records (only models with DKG transmission and production between 03/10 – 08/10) EPA DR #4055 Received: June 23, 2010
No. 07-108 August 28, 2007

NRC MEETING SEPTEMBER 11 IN RAINSVILLE, ALA., TO DISCUSSREVIEW PROCESS FOR EXPECTED NEW REACTOR APPLICATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting in Rainsville, Ala., on Tuesday,Sept. 11, to discuss how the agency will review an expected Combined License (COL) application for newreactors at the Bellefonte site near Scottsboro. The prospective applicant, Tennessee Valley Authority, has toldthe NRC it intends to apply later this year for a license to build and operate two AP1000 reactors at Bellefonte.

“The NRC’s reviews of this application and the others we’re expecting before the end of this year couldcertainly affect nearby communities,” said William Borchardt, Director of the NRC’s Office of New Reactors.“This meeting will be one of several where the NRC will work with residents to help them understand andparticipate in this process, because we value the information they can provide.”

The meeting will be held in the Tom Bevill Lyceum at the Northeast Alabama Community College, 138Alabama Highway 35 in Rainsville, from 7 p.m. until 9 p.m. NRC staff presentations will describe the overallCombined License review process, which includes safety and environmental assessments, as well as how thepublic can participate in the process. The NRC will host an open house for an hour prior to the meeting somembers of the public have the opportunity to talk informally with agency staff.

A COL, if issued, is authorization from the NRC to construct and, with conditions, operate a nuclearpower plant at a specific site and in accordance with laws and regulations. More information on the NRC’s newreactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Web site here:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html.

The AP1000 is one of four NRC-certified reactor designs that can be referenced in a COL. It is a 1,000MWe advanced pressurized water reactor that incorporates passive safety systems and simplified systemdesigns. The AP1000 is similar to another certified design, the AP600, but uses a taller reactor vessel toaccommodate longer fuel, and also includes larger steam generators and a larger pressurizer.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  April  30,  2006,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Leroy
Halterman,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/ LEROY HALTERMAN
-------------------------------------------
Leroy Halterman
President, Secretary & Treasurer
(principal executive and financial officer)