alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018305EN.01003401.xml

| 29.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/34

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 67/2017

of 17 March 2017

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1831]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2236 of 12 December 2016 specifying the technical characteristics of the 2018 ad hoc module on reconciliation between work and family life (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2236 of 12 December 2016 specifying the technical characteristics of the 2018 ad hoc module on reconciliation between work and family life (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 18av (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/8) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘18aw. | 32016 R 2236: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2236 of 12 December 2016 specifying the technical characteristics of the 2018 ad hoc module on reconciliation between work and family life (OJ L 337, 13.12.2016, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘18aw.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2236 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 18 March 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 337, 13.12.2016, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### In the Matter of Vim Electric Co., Inc., Appellant-Respondent. Retail & Wholesale Employees Union, Local 830, Respondent-Appellant.

Order denying in part motion to vacate and set aside, or, in the alternative, to modify an award in arbitration, modified on the law and the facts by striking from *871its decretal paragraph everything following the words “ be and the same hereby is denied”, and by adding thereto the following: “and it is further Ordered that the said award in arbitration be and the same hereby is in all respects confirmed.” As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondent-appellant. In our opinion the finding and determination of the award therein numbered “ 5 ” was properly made within the matters submitted to the arbitrator under the stipulation and agreement of arbitration. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 967.]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Public Federal Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Roundtable; Region 
VII Regulatory Fairness Board

    The Small Business Administration Region VII Regulatory Fairness 
Board and the SBA Office of the National Ombudsman will hold a Public 
Roundtable on Thursday, November 18, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. at the Bradbury 
Thompson Center on the Campus of Washburn University, 1700 SW College 
Avenue, Topeka, KS 66621-0001, to provide small business owners and 
representatives of trade associations with an opportunity to share 
information concerning the Federal regulatory enforcement and 
compliance environment.
    Anyone wishing to attend or to make a presentation must contact 
Gary Cook in writing or by fax, in order to be put on the agenda. Gary 
Cook, District Director, SBA Kansas City District Office, 323 W 8th 
Street, Suite 501, Kansas City, MO 64105, phone (816) 374-6897, fax 
(816) 374-6759, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#244345565d0a474b4b4f645746450a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="523533202b7c313d3d39122130337c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information, see our Web site at http://www.sba.gov/ombudsman.

    Dated: October 28, 2004.
Peter Sorum,
Senior Advisor, Office of the National Ombudsman.
[FR Doc. 04-24497 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §2213a. Treatment of certain benefits and costs

#### (a) In general

In the case of a flood risk management or coastal storm risk management project in a region of moderate or high seismic hazard, for the purpose of a benefit-cost analysis for the project, the Secretary shall not include in that analysis any additional design and construction costs resulting from addressing seismic concerns.

#### (b) Savings provision

Except with respect to the benefit-cost analysis, the additional costs referred to in subsection (a) shall be—

(1) included in the total project cost; and

(2) subject to cost-share requirements otherwise applicable to the project.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title I, §152, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2658; Pub. L. 117–263, div. H, title LXXXI, §8380, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3828.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "a flood risk management or coastal storm risk management project in a region" for "flood risk management project that incidentally generates seismic safety benefits in regions".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of div. AA of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
§ 831.1406 Waiver precluded. ( a ) *When not granted.* Waiver of an overpayment cannot be granted when— ( 1 ) The overpayment was obtained by fraud; or
( 2 ) The overpayment was made to an estate.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40171

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

JUAN CARLOS CAMPOS,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-623-1

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Carlos Campos

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Campos has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 26, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40171 Document: 00511274188 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
|  | (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, thefinancial      condition and results of operations of the Company for the six months      ended June 30, 2010. |
|--|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       | NF Energy Saving      Corporation |                                              |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                              |                                              |   |
| Date:      August 17, 2010 | By:                               | /S/      Li Hua, Wang                             |   |
|                       |                              | (Principal Financial and      Accounting Officer) |   |

----
Exhibit 15.1
 
 Securities and Exchange Commission
 100 F Street, N.E.
 Washington, DC 20549
 
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  The firm of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer, A member of Ernst & Young Global, was previously the independent registered public accounting firm of Adira Energy Ltd. (the “Company”), and reported on the financial statements of the Company from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2013.We have read Item 16F of Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2014 on Form 20-F, and are in agreement with the statements contained in that item.
  Tel-Aviv, Israel
KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIEREROctober 9, 2015
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
 
  Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
 3 Aminadav St.
 Tel-Aviv 6706703, Israel
 Tel: +972-3-6232525
 Fax: +972-3-5622555
 ey.com
# L_2016211EN.01002301.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/23

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 86/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1269]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2015/13 of 31 October 2014 amending Annex III to Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the flowrate range of water meters (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2015/13 of 31 October 2014 amending Annex III to Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the flowrate range of water meters (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 27e (Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter IX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 L 0013: Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2015/13 of 31 October 2014 (OJ L 3, 7.1.2015, p. 42).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 L 0013: Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2015/13 of 31 October 2014 (OJ L 3, 7.1.2015, p. 42).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Directive (EU) 2015/13 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 3, 7.1.2015, p. 42.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 361.102 Online registration. ( a ) *In general.* ( 1 ) Any importer, importing company, customs broker or importer's agent with a U.S. street address may register and obtain the username necessary to log on to the automatic aluminum import license issuance system. Foreign companies may obtain a username if they have a U.S. address through which they may be reached; P.O. boxes will not be accepted. A username will be issued within two business days. Companies will be able to register online through the AIM system website. However, should a company prefer to apply for a username non-electronically, a phone/email option will be available at Commerce during regular business hours.
( 2 ) This username will be required in order to log on to the aluminum import license issuance system. A single username will be issued to an importer, customs broker or importer's agent. Operating units within the company (*e.g.,* individual branches, divisions or employees) will all use the same basic company username but can supply suffixes to identify the branches. The aluminum import license issuance system will be designed to allow multiple users of a single identification number from different locations within the company to enter information simultaneously.
( b ) *Information required to obtain a username.* In order to obtain a username, the importer, importing company, customs broker or importer's agent will be required to provide general information. This information will include: The filer company name, employer identification number (EIN) or Customs ID number (the Customs-issued importer number) (where no EIN is available), U.S. street address, phone number, contact information and email address for both the company headquarters and any branch offices that will be applying for aluminum licenses. It is the responsibility of the applicant to keep the information up to date. This information will not be released by Commerce, except as required by U.S. law.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0808 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-170-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

5.0 $ 425.00 $ 425.00 41 $17,425.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $17,425

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Timothy D. Kahlenberg, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of XTENT, Inc. onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of XTENT, Inc.
| Date: November 2, 2007 |
|-----------------------------|
|                        |
| By:                         | /s/ Timothy D. Kahlenberg |
|                        | Timothy D. Kahlenberg |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |
|                        | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |

 

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARVINDER SINGH; KAWALJEET

KAUR SACHDEVA; JAPNEET

SINGH,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney

General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71489

Agency Nos. A099-873-204

A099-873-205

A099-873-206

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 8, 2014** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The BIA didn’t err in adopting the immigration judge’s adverse credibility

finding. The immigration judge listed “specific instances in the record that

FILED

APR 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
page 2

form[ed] the basis of the . . . adverse credibility determination,” Shrestha v.

Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010), including Singh’s voluntary return to

India, discrepancies between the affidavits of Singh and his father, and petitioners’

inconsistent testimony regarding their place of residence and visa application

process. Nothing in the record “compels a contrary conclusion.” Singh v.

Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir. 2006).

DENIED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 45610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18761]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-14]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: August 8, 2012.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.
    Matters to be Considered:

Summary Agenda

    July 11, 2012 minutes--Open Session.

(No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

Appraisal Foundation April and May 2012 Grant Reimbursement Requests;
Arkansas Compliance Review;
Maryland Compliance Review.

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov. You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, 
fax or commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H 
Street NW., Ste 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-
4101. Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must agree to submit to reasonable security 
measures. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public 
attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the 
ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any 
video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any 
other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is 
prohibited at ASC meetings.

     Dated: July 26, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-18761 Filed 7-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
### §60504. Rule of construction

Nothing in this Act or an amendment made by this Act shall be construed as creating a right or entitlement to assistance or services for any individual, program, or grant recipient. Each grant made under this Act or an amendment made by this Act shall—

(1) be made as competitive grants 1 to eligible entities for a 12-month period, except that grants awarded under section 113 2, section 60521 of this title, section 60531 of this title, and section 60532 2 of this title or under section 10631 of this title may be made for a 24-month period; and

(2) require that services for participants, when necessary and appropriate, be transferred from programs funded under this Act or the amendment made by this Act, respectively, to State and community-based programs not funded under this Act or the amendment made by this Act, respectively, before the expiration of the grant.

(Pub. L. 110–199, §6, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 660; Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §502(h), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5231.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 110–199, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 657, known as the Second Chance Act of 2007: Community Safety Through Recidivism Prevention and also as the Second Chance Act of 2007. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2008 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

Section 113, referred to in par. (1), means section 113 of Pub. L. 110–199. For complete classification of section 113 of Pub. L. 110–199 to the Code, see Tables.

Section 60532 of this title, referred to in par. (1), was repealed by Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §504(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5233.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 17504 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2018—Par. (1). Pub. L. 115–391 inserted "or under section 10631 of this title" after "section 60532 of this title".

1 So in original. Probably should be "as a competitive grant".

2 See References in Text note below.