alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OBM Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
8, 2004.
    Title and OMB Number: Viability of TRICARE Standard Survey; OMB 
Number 0720-0031.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 25,165.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 25,165.
    Average Burden Per Response: 10 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 4,194.
    Needs and Uses: As mandated by Congress, confidential surveys of 
civilian physicians will be completed in TRICARE market areas within 
the United States to determine how many accept new TRICARE Standard 
patients in each market area. 20 TRICARE market areas in the United 
States will be conducted each fiscal year until all TRICARE market 
areas in the United States have been surveyed.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/ESCD/Information Management 
Division, 1225 South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: October 29, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-24784 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

gonorable a. F8t Bdlial-d8 

Civil Diatrlct Attorner 

xalles, Texao 

“Ho oocoupatian CPT o&r than hfmela Smpcaed 

shall be Xevlod by $.he Stats or any count 

or tom, Ypaa any 1t.h ~,lsmvu?anae ampany h;x 

rubxbject to &a occup8tlon tfu in proportion te ltr 

groae premitm r&qeiptr ox it8 agenta, Tba osaupatlen tax impwed by this law ah411 be the role OQaupatioa tas whidh say aompaay dob-q$ buainecc in 

this ~stace~uadec the pr?oolrloa of thlr chapter chall 

be requizvd tic pan.' 

Among ether thinga, Artiae 7047, V%mm&l’~ Anaotated 

Civil Statutes, providea; 

“!Phme &al.% be 3,wrlmS cm and collected f'roa 

every pawim, flma, oongsng or uaoaiatloa of 

pereonc, pureufsa, any a? the oi3aupatlonr named 
in th8 r0mwittg rmahe~ed wbcuri8itma of two 

srtiale, an annu8l aaauptlon tu, vhlab shsll bs 

paid aiuiuall;y In 8drrnoe exaept uhere here&a otherv1ae p”’ 

ovkied, on every suah oaaupation or 8eperste 

satab Irbment a8 followa: 

I 

. . . . 

‘(b) @b~erSl U&t S~d.81 &$eAt8.--FlWA each 

errd every pereon aotlng 88 a (tenma or 8peoIal 

S-At of every lR8ur8noe 0oEpany that arap traaarot 

any Inauraaee business In thl8 state, on annusl 

oeau~tlan tax of TVeAtr-f;Ve D0llU.o ($25.00). By 

*general agent* a@ uaud heroin, is taoant any perwn, vhether a mwber of 8 flnn or a88oclatlon, or 

u peppe8entrtIre or employee, x&o may exercire a 

general l uparvi8ion over tha bus&e88 of any IasuraRae oompnay in thle Btatie, or over lee01 ~801e8, 

of 8u8h laauran~ oeapmie8, tar any person rupervkleg auoh busIne88, or sny port thereof, a8 aantradirtinguhhed f%cpn a loeel l -t 0F 10081 r$cmaJ. 

By *rpeaIal agent’ as ueed herein, I8 mxmt 8ny 

per8on, vhether a aember of 8 SImn ar as8oaiatfon, 

or 88 repre8entatIva 0F smployee, vho issy exeral8e 

8uperrI8IQR In aIq exaeutlTe 6apaait , othor thrn 

o f aa o ffio oef r l ua h aaa p eonvey, Lw r b ur ti or 

any inawanae aompany 5ntUr 8t4te, or over the 

adju8tmeAt of km&on or the plaekrg oi r1.b. But 

OAe gbqmiintoftha aAAu6lQoacupotIaAtaxhereIA hlpored 8hal3 be r%@red of Bng one per80~ randem 

this 8ubdlvi8ion. 

It uill be noted theit uid hvtlcle 4771 v&e twoted 

in 1909,tile Sootian 10 (b of Artlola 7047 beesleo law IA 1931. 

The la8t e~b8h.m af the !! av-wker8 muat be given etfeet. AA 

aat that Is later in point of the aontrc3a and papeal u1 

earlier act, iMofar as the two are Inaori818tent aad Fcreeonailable. Fry r. Jaokaoa, 264 8.U. 612~ ~roaa v. Dwrouaett Inde AdeAt School Mstrlot, 277 8.U. 7511 uhItteaborg v. ~AfbP, 

2&&M. 152, Cop. lippa.; 39 Tex. Jur., pp. 139-145 

EemeC ang person fa;Sling vIthIA the deflnitlon OS 

‘gumral tA@At, a8 cOAtsinn IA Section 10(b) of Artlale 7047 

18 rubjeet to the o*CIljMtiOA teX therein ;lOv;ted, and to 8 eO& 

waupatlor, t8x af ha3f that amount, Vh%re 3aviad by the aowaty. 
P 

Ban0rable B. Pat Rdvbrd8, pbgai 3 

our ewv8r to yea QWStiOA ia ui tUfl.raative 

thbt 0. - N &CUWy tan8 rithbt SUOh 

YOU’S 

OAO l SSWlitt& 

defiR Itio R. 

verty r uly
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report of New York & Company, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 29,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Richard P. Crystal, Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President of the Company, and I, Ronald W. Ristau, Chief Operating Officerand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge,:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|                        | /s/ RICHARD  P. CRYSTAL                 |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                   | Richard P. Crystal                      |
| December 13, 2005 | *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and* |
|                   | *President*                             |

 
|                        | /s/ RONALD  W. RISTAU         |
|------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                   | Ronald W. Ristau              |
| December 13, 2005 | *Chief Operating Officer and* |
|                   | *Chief Financial Officer*     |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 197 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 197

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
 cemetery for veterans in the Jacksonville, Florida, metropolitan area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Stearns (for himself, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, 
and Mr. Mica) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
 cemetery for veterans in the Jacksonville, Florida, metropolitan area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL CEMETERY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish, 
in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, a 
national cemetery in the Jacksonville, Florida, metropolitan area to 
serve the needs of veterans and their families.
    (b) Consultation in Selection of Site.--Before selecting the site 
for the national cemetery established under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall consult with--
            (1) appropriate officials of the State of Florida and local 
        officials of the Jacksonville metropolitan area, and
            (2) appropriate officials of the United States, including 
        the Administrator of General Services, with respect to land 
        belonging to the United States in that area that would be 
        suitable to establish the national cemetery under subsection 
        (a).
    (c) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
establishment of the national cemetery under subsection (a). The report 
shall set forth a schedule for such establishment and an estimate of 
the costs associated with such establishment.
                                 <all>
```
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Giora Dishon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          This Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Nova Measuring Instruments, Ltd. (the
          Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 12, 2006

| |  | /s/ Giora Dishon
Giora Dishon President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# • RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 60 For Reauthorization ( 270.62(d» Amendmentto Requirements for HazardousWaste Incinerator Permits 54 FR 4286-4288 January 30, 1989 (non-HSWA ClusterV)

In lieu of making the changes addressed by this checklist, a State may submit a certification by the State Attorney General that he/she interprets his/her State's existing regulations in the mannerdescribed in this rule. Such a simplified application is allowed because EPA is only clarifying current regulatory language, and the Agency assumesthatthese requirements are already 

### In effect in most States. If a StateAttorney General cannotcertifythat he/she interprets his/her Stateis eXisting regulations in the mannerdescribed in

. this rule, the State's regulations must be amended to reflectthis clarification. AG certification needed.

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: MORE BROADEQUIV- STRIN- ER IN ALENT GENT SCOPE

PART270 - EPAADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE HAZARDOUSWASTE PERMIT PROGRAM 

# • SUBPART F - SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS

HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR PERMITS



# •

January 30, 1989

- Page 1 of2

### RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 60: Amendmentto Requirements for Hazardous Waste Incinerator Permits (cont'd) 

# o

STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ER IN REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE

after "permit," replace "to" with ''for''; after "incinerate," replace "may"with "must"; . after "in accordance with," insert· "§270.19(b) and"; before "(9)" insert "(b)"; after "section," add clause regarding information in §270.19(c) and a sentence regarding exemption from §264.343 and 264.345; after''trial burn results" add sentence regarding submission oftrail burn. results prior to permit issuance; in last . sentence replace 

### "if' with "when"; change requirements so that the director specifies a time period priorto permit issuance in which the trial burn must be submitted 

### Note: Previously authorized
as morestringent
270.62(dl" 807(10)

. 

# x

,

, 

### .

January 30, 1989 - Page 2 of2 

# c
# L_2017161EN.01005201.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/52

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 267/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1056]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1190 of 20 July 2015 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1190 of 20 July 2015 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1a (Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 1190: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1190 of 20 July 2015 (OJ L 193, 21.7.2015, p. 115).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 1190: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1190 of 20 July 2015 (OJ L 193, 21.7.2015, p. 115).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) 2015/1190 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 193, 21.7.2015, p. 115.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §581. Hiring special means of transportation

In their execution and inspection of river and harbor improvement work, at points beyond easy reach of ordinary regular transportation lines, Engineer officers are authorized to hire and use such transportation as they may consider desirable and advantageous to the progress of work.

(July 25, 1912, ch. 253, §9, 37 Stat. 233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act July 25, 1912, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1912".
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1795

To provide that the income tax shall not apply for taxable years during 

which the taxpayer, or either spouse of a married couple, is serving 

in the war in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To provide that the income tax shall not apply for taxable 

years during which the taxpayer, or either spouse of 

a married couple, is serving in the war in Iraq.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TAX ON ACCOUNT OF SERV4 ICE IN WAR IN IRAQ. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—No tax imposed by subtitle A of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall apply to any indi7 vidual (or, in the case of a married individual, to such 

8 individual and such individual’s spouse) for any taxable 

9 year if during any portion of such taxable year such indi-
2

•HR 1795 IH 

1 vidual (or either spouse) is serving as a member of the 

2 Armed Forces of the United States (as defined in section 

3 7701(a)(15) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) on 

4 active duty in the combat zone designated for purposes 

5 of the war with Iraq. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to 

7 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 8, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60477 Summary Calendar

RUBEN PEREIRA; VILMA ESPERANZA SOLIS-RIVERA; RUBEN ALBERTO PEREIRA-SOLIS; VILMA VIOLETA PEREIRA-SOLIS, Petitioners,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.
* * * * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH 02-60478 * * * * * * * * * * ROBEL PEREIRA-SOLIS, Petitioner,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A73 756 832 BIA No. A73 756 834 BIA No. A73 756 836 BIA No. A73 756 837 BIA No. A76 226 680

-------------------- Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.No. 02-60477 c/w 02-60478 -2-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** The regulation is currently codified under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(a)(7)(ii). PER CURIAM: * Ruben Pereira, his wife, and his children (collectively, the Pereiras) petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirming the immigration judge’s decision to deny their application for asylum and for a withholding of deportation. They argue that the summary affirmance procedures of the BIA, as codified at the time of their hearing under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7)(ii), ** deprive them of meaningful judicial review and deny them due process. Their contentions are without merit. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft , ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Mar. 28, 2003), 2003 WL 1093979. The Pereiras also assert that the BIA violated 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7)(ii) because it affirmed the decision of the immigration judge despite the fact that the immigration judge committed material errors. This is in effect a challenge to the merits of the immigration judge’s decision. Even if it is assumed that the immigration judge did not consider their documentary evidence detailing the conditions in Guatemala during the 1980s and at the time of their departure (despite having considered other documentary evidence presented before the hearing), the Pereiras have not shown that this generalNo. 02-60477 c/w 02-60478 -3- information was sufficient to overcome the flaws in the evidence presented in the application and at the hearing. The Pereiras likewise have not established that Ruben Pereira’s membership in a particular social group, resulting from his position as a former national police officer, is sufficient to overcome that evidence, in light of the fact that Ruben Pereira stayed on relatively amicable terms with the police while working as a truck driver. We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the decision is supported by substantial evidence.
See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996). The petition for review is DENIED.
§ 185.110 Default upon failure to file an answer. ( a ) If the defendant does not file an answer within the time prescribed in § 185.109(a), the reviewing official may refer the complaint to the ALJ.
( b ) Upon the referral of the complaint, the ALJ shall promptly serve on the defendant in the manner prescribed in § 185.108, a notice that an initial decision will be issued under this section.
( c ) The ALJ shall assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true and, if such facts establish liability under § 185.103, the ALJ shall issue an initial decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under the statute.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, by failing to file a timely answer the defendant waives any right to further review of the penalties and assessments imposed under paragraph (c) of this section and the initial decision shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after it is issued.
( e ) If, before such an initial decision becomes final, the defendant files a motion with the ALJ seeking to reopen on the grounds that extraordinary circumstances prevented the defendant from filing an answer, the initial decision shall be stayed pending the ALJ's decision on the motion.
( f ) If, on such motion, the defendant can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances excusing the failure to file a timely answer, the ALJ shall withdraw the initial decision in paragraph (c) of this section, if such a decision has been issued, and shall grant the defendant an opportunity to answer the complaint.
( g ) A decision of the ALJ denying a defendant's motion under paragraph (e) of this section is not subject to reconsideration under § 185.138.
( h ) The defendant may appeal to the authority head the decision denying a motion to reopen by filing a notice of appeal with the authority head within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal shall stay the initial decision until the authority head decides the issue.
( i ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the authority head, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( j ) The authority head shall decide expeditiously whether extraordinary circumstances excuse the defendant's failure to file a timely answer based solely on the record before the ALJ.
( k ) If the authority head decides that extraordinary circumstances excused the defendant's failure to file a timely answer, the authority head shall remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant the defendant an opportunity to answer.
( l ) If the authority head decides that the defendant's failure to file a timely answer is not excused, the authority head shall reinstate the initial decision of the ALJ, which shall become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the authority head issues such decision.
#### Fanny M. Mann, Respondent, *v.*William K. Mann, Appellant.

(Argued December 17, 1878;

decided December 20, 1878.)

*George F. Danforth*for appellant.

*A. J. Abbott*for respondent.

Agree to affirm orders of General and Special Terms. No opinion.

Orders affirmed.