alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Department of Energy

Washington, DC 20585

April 16, 1998

Mr. Hugh Thompson, Jr.

Deputy Executive Director

for Regulatory Programs

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

11545 Rockville Pike

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Mr. Thompson:

We would like to propose that our agencies jointly select the Receiving Basin for Off-Site Fuel

(RBOF) and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as the third and fourth pilot

projects under our Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

The RBOF, which is located at the Savannah River Site (SRS) in Aiken, South Carolina, provides

for the safe receipt and interim storage of irradiated spent nuclear fuel elements from off-site test

and research reactors--domestic and foreign. The RBOF is located in H area of SRS, near the

center of the site, and has been operating and receiving off-site fuel since 1964.

The PNNL is located on the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. There are six key

facilities at PNNL--the Hazardous Waste Storage Building, Applied Chemistry Laboratory,

Material Science Laboratory, Chemical Science Laboratory, Life Science Laboratory, which are

located in the 300 Area of the Hanford Site, and the Environmental Molecular Science

Laboratory, located in the Richland North Research Complex.

Our respective staffs will begin working to develop a work plan and schedule to begin the RBOF

pilot within the next three months. We anticipate developing a work plan and schedule to begin

the PNNL pilot in early FY 1999. The Department is committed to exploring additional, more

challenging pilots over the next 18 months to simulate Nuclear Regulatory Commission

regulation.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at (202) 586-6151. /

Sincerely,

Peter N. Brush

Acting Assistant Secretary

Environment, Safety, and Health

9805220186 ~~805220tt}45 ~~~~8Ct416 90416 F i~~d wh-sIn k on recycW ppr . ____ --____

PDR WASTE EDO-- G980249

UK-I PDR -j. .... _
t~~~~~~ -

.i ;' -A . ._ .

K-j

Ie

EDO Principal Correspondence Control

-

FROM: DUE: 05/11/98

Peter N. Brush

Department of Energy (POE)

o' r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

EDO CONTROL: G980249

DOC DT: 04/16/98

FINAL REPLY: .W0

/67, 7

Thompson, DEDR

FOR SIGNATURE-OF : ** GRN ** CRC NO:

Thompson, DEDR

DESC: ROUTING:

RECEIVING BASIN FOR OFF-SITE RUEL AND PACIFIC

NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY (PNNL) AS THIRD AND

FOURTH PILOT PROJECT OF MOU

DATE: 04/20/98

ASSIGNED TO: CONTACT:

NMSS Paperiello

Callan

Thadani

Thompson

Norry

Blaha

Burns

Knapp, RES

Collins, NRR

Martin, AEOD

Cyr, OGC

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:

p,' ' i I',p,.9

' V5.11 T - t,,?,V, e N-

I _.cf q
I.,

0, ,

II II* N f v e EE I - I - I--

. I I 3 .,

.,

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

N4GTN, D.C. 20585

OFFICIAL BUSINESS

Mr. Hugh Thompson, Jr.

Deputy Executive Director

for Regulatory Programs

U, S. Nuclear Rgulatory Commission

11545 Rockville Pike

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

';I

And

1

2.1

}

1:11 .. 

. , 

. I -I limit,Of #$' 11 31141 I

i,
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--First-Class Package Service Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 27, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 19, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add First-Class Package Service Contract 97 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2019-58, CP2019-62.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-27939 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Timothy D. Kahlenberg, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of XTENT, Inc. on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of XTENT, Inc.

 
| Date: May 15, 2009 |                                         |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                         |
| By:                     | /s/ Timothy D. Kahlenberg                    |   |
|                    | Timothy D. Kahlenberg                        |   |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer                      |   |
|                    | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |   |

 

----
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0115 - Rulemaking Plan to Incorporate First Revised Order EA-03-009 Requirements Into 10 CFR 50.55a

Accession Number: ML041610180

Date Released: Monday, July 26, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML041620301 - SECY-04-0115 - Rulemaking Plan to Incorporate First Revised Order EA-03-009 Requirements Into 10 CFR 50.55a (5 page(s), 7/7/2004)
    - ML041610210 - SECY-04-0115Atch - Rulemaking plan for 10 CFR 50.55a Codes and standards (8 page(s), 7/7/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2      Section 906 Certification of CFO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill
Moses, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


BY:  /s/ Merrill Moses
     -----------------
     Merrill Moses
     President and CFO
     May 15, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6359

ANQUAN M. COBB, a/k/a Anquan Montrez Cobb,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

MCKITHER BODISON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(8:10-cv-00919-HFF)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anquan M. Cobb, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anquan M. Cobb seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Cobb has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# L_2018080EN.01002001.xml

| 22.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 80/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/20

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 178/2016

of 23 September 2016

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/436]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/823 of 25 May 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 laying down the rules of organisation and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/823 of 25 May 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 laying down the rules of organisation and procedure of the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 12zs (Commission Regulation (EC) No 771/2008) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32016 R 0823: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/823 of 25 May 2016 (OJ L 137, 26.5.2016, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32016 R 0823: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/823 of 25 May 2016 (OJ L 137, 26.5.2016, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/823 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 September 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Bergdís ELLERTSDÓTTIR

---

(1)  
  OJ L 137, 26.5.2016, p. 4.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §12576. State application

#### (a) In general

Each State desiring an allotment under section 12572 of this title shall submit an application to the Director at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Director may reasonably require.

#### (b) Contents

An application under subsection (a) shall—

(1) describe the scholarship program and the student employment program for which assistance under this part is sought;

(2) contain assurances that the lead agency will work in cooperation with the local law enforcement liaisons, representatives of police labor organizations and police management organizations, and other appropriate State and local agencies to develop and implement interagency agreements designed to carry out this part;

(3) contain assurances that the State will advertise the scholarship assistance and student employment it will provide under this part and that the State will use such programs to enhance recruitment efforts;

(4) contain assurances that the State will screen and select law enforcement personnel for participation in the scholarship program under this part;

(5) contain assurances that under such student employment program the State will screen and select, for participation in such program, students who have an interest in undertaking a career in law enforcement;

(6) contain assurances that under such scholarship program the State will make scholarship payments to institutions of higher education on behalf of persons who receive scholarships under this part;

(7) with respect to such student employment program, identify—

(A) the employment tasks that students will be assigned to perform;

(B) the compensation that students will be paid to perform such tasks; and

(C) the training that students will receive as part of their participation in the program;

(8) identify model curriculum and existing programs designed to meet the educational and professional needs of law enforcement personnel; and

(9) contain assurances that the State will promote cooperative agreements with educational and law enforcement agencies to enhance law enforcement personnel recruitment efforts in institutions of higher education.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XX, §200207, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2059.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14116 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-053 September 18, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC CONDUCTING SPECIAL INSPECTION

 AT SEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The NRC has begun a Special Inspection at the Seabrook nuclear power plant to inspect and

assess an event that occurred at the facility on Aug. 31. On that day, the plant was shut down in

accordance with operating procedures after two emergency diesel generators experienced problems

with their voltage controls. Throughout the event, all off-site power lines and a pair of smaller

supplemental diesel generators were available.

After repairs were made and the generators were returned to service, the reactor was restarted

on Sept. 3 and returned to power operations on Sept. 4.

The Special Inspection team includes two specialists from Region I supported by the NRC

Resident Inspectors at the plant and Regional Risk Analysts. One phase of the inspection started today

at the Seabrook, N.H., site. The inspectors will be tasked with evaluating the circumstances associated

with the Aug. 31st event. Among other things, they will independently assess the apparent causes that

contributed to the failure of the emergency diesel generators and review the company’s root cause

evaluation of what took place.

Nuclear power plants produce electricity which is fed into the grid. However, they also take

back some of that power for the operation of safety systems. In the event that off-site power is lost, the

plant would turn to its backup sources of energy, including its emergency diesel generators, to shut

down the plant. As such, the generators play an important role in plant safety.

Phases of the inspection will occur over the next several weeks. The inspection report will be

issued within 45 days after the exit meeting of the inspection.

###
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofVanity Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony N. DeMint                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                |
|   | March			13, 2006                                                                                                                                                      |
No. D-863.

#### In re Disbarment of Morris.

It is ordered that Jerrold L. Morris, of Chicago, Ill., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
472 P.2d 984

#### Esther M. GARCIA and Lupe Suarez, Petitioners, v. UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., and City of Albuquerque, Respondents.

No. 9088.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 20, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 455, 81 N.M. 703, 472 P.2d 668, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
#### Terry Lynn KUELPER *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 03-1379

150 S.W.3d 282

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 4, 2004

*Larry R. Froelich,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Terry Lynn Kuelper, by and through his attorney, Larry R. Froelich, has filed a motion for belated appeal from his convictions of two counts of rape. Fie also seeks a writ of certiorari to complete the record on appeal.

Appellant was convicted following a jury trial held on June 24 through June 26, 2003. The judgment and commitment order was entered on July 22, 2003. Appellant filed this motion on December 3, 2003. We initially denied the motion and remanded the matter to the Benton County Circuit Court to settle the record. *See Kuelper v. State,*355 Ark. 539, 140 S.W.3d 464 (2004) *(per curiam).*Particularly, we instructed the trial court to determine whether Appellant’s trial attorneys, John Gross and Dan Hash, had been relieved of their responsibility to represent Appellant in this matter, whether Appellant had requested his attorneys to file a notice of appeal on his behalf, and whether current counsel, Mr. Froelich, had been appointed to represent Appellant on appeal.

Following remand, the trial court entered an order on January 28, 2004, finding that (1) Appellant had immediately, on the date of his trial, requested Mr. Gross, in Mr. Hash’s presence, *371to file a notice of appeal on his behalf; (2) Mr. Froelich entered his appearance on Appellant’s behalf on September 12, 2003; and (3) Mr. Gross and Mr. Hash were relieved of their obligations to represent Appellant on the date that Mr. Froelich entered his appearance. Based on these findings, we now grant the motion for belated appeal. *See Venis v. State,*350 Ark. 436, 87 S.W.3d 241 (2002) *(per curiam).*A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct to review the conduct of Mr. Gross and Mr. Hash in this matter.

We further issue a writ of certiorari and direct the court reporter for the Benton County Circuit Court to complete the transcript so that it may be promptly filed with this court’s clerk. A briefing schedule will then be set.

It is so ordered.
### **PART III—PATENTS AND PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS**

Chap.
Sec.
25.
Amendment and Correction of Patents
251
26.
Ownership and Assignment
261
27.
Government Interests in Patents
266
28.
Infringement of Patents
271
29.
Remedies for Infringement of Patent, and Other Actions
281
30.
Prior Art Citations to Office and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents
301
31.
Inter Partes Review
311
32.
Post-Grant Review
321

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2011**—Pub. L. 112–29, §6(b), (e), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 304, 311, added items for chapters 31 and 32 and struck out former item for chapter 31 "Optional Inter Partes Reexamination of Patents".

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13206(a)(17), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1905, inserted a comma after "Patent" in item for chapter 29.

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4604(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–570, as amended by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13202(c)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902, substituted "Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents" for "Reexamination of Patents" in item for chapter 30 and added item for chapter 31.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–256, title I, §101(7), Sept. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 816, added item for chapter 30.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Norman S. Johnson, the Chief Financial Officer
of California Oil & Gas Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)          
the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas Corporation for
the period ended August 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2)         
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of California Oil
& Gas Corporation.

Dated October 22, 2007.

/s/ Norman S. JohnsonNorman
S. Johnson Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

---