alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 550.1613 Selection of agents for assignment.

If application of paragraphs (f)(3) and (4) of § 550.1611 (or application of those paragraphs through § 550.1612) requires CBP to select agents for assignment to a particular regular tour of duty out of a pool of agents who prefer a different assignment, CBP must make any such selection consistent with an established written plan that includes the criteria that will be considered and the priority of those criteria. Such plan must be consistent with the requirements of this subpart.
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John McLeod, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of California Oil & Gas Corporation.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: April 25, 2007

 

/s/ John McLeod                                                            

John McLeod, President, Treasurer, Secretary and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1838

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the presumptions of serviceconnection relating to diseases and disabilities of former prisoners of war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2003

Mr. EVANS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the presumptions of service-connection relating to diseases and 

disabilities of former prisoners of war.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTIONS OF SERVICE-CONNECTION RE4 LATING TO DISEASES AND DISABILITIES OF 

5 FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR. 

6 Subsection (b) of section 1112 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(b)(1) For the purposes of section 1110 of this title 

9 and subject to the provisions of section 1113 of this title, 

10 in the case of a veteran who is a former prisoner of war—
2

•HR 1838 IH 

1 ‘‘(A) a disease specified in paragraph (2) shall 

2 be considered to have been incurred in or aggravated 

3 by such service, notwithstanding that there is no 

4 record of such disease during the period of service; 

5 and 

6 ‘‘(B) if the veteran was detained or interned as 

7 a prisoner of war for not less than thirty days, a dis8 ease specified in paragraph (3) which became mani9 fest to a degree of 10 percent or more after active 

10 military, naval, or air service shall be considered to 

11 have been incurred in or aggravated by such service, 

12 notwithstanding that there is no record of such dis13 ease during the period of service. 

14 ‘‘(2) The diseases specified in this paragraph are the 

15 following: 

16 ‘‘(A) Psychosis. 

17 ‘‘(B) Any of the anxiety states. 

18 ‘‘(C) Dysthymic disorder (or depressive neu19 rosis). 

20 ‘‘(D) Organic residuals of frostbite, if the Sec21 retary determines that the veteran was interned in 

22 climatic conditions consistent with the occurrence of 

23 frostbite. 

24 ‘‘(E) Post-traumatic osteoarthritis. 
3

•HR 1838 IH 

1 ‘‘(3) The diseases specified in this paragraph are the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(A) Avitaminosis. 

4 ‘‘(B) Beriberi (including beriberi heart disease). 

5 ‘‘(C) Chronic dysentery. 

6 ‘‘(D) Helminthiasis. 

7 ‘‘(E) Malnutrition (including optic atrophy as8 sociated with malnutrition). 

9 ‘‘(F) Pellagra. 

10 ‘‘(G) Any other nutritional deficiency. 

11 ‘‘(H) Cirrhosis of the liver. 

12 ‘‘(I) Peripheral neuropathy except where di13 rectly related to infectious causes. 

14 ‘‘(J) Irritable bowel syndrome. 

15 ‘‘(K) Peptic ulcer disease.’’.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Potter, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — Callahan, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 021

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Branagan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Paul Branagan                                   			

Paul Branagan |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------|

|   | April			17, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
# L_2018297EN.01003201.xml

| 22.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/32

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 26/2017

of 3 February 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1760]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1618 of 8 September 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to fertilisers for the purposes of adapting Annexes I and IV (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1618 of 8 September 2016 amending Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to fertilisers for the purposes of adapting Annexes I and IV (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 1618: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1618 of 8 September 2016 (OJ L 242, 9.9.2016, p. 24).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 1618: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/1618 of 8 September 2016 (OJ L 242, 9.9.2016, p. 24).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/1618 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 February 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 242, 9.9.2016, p. 24.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1500

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize veterans to select the 

appraiser for housing loans for which they apply that are to be guaranteed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Mr. SMITH of Washington (for himself, Mr. EVANS, and Mr. MICHAUD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize veterans 

to select the appraiser for housing loans for which they 

apply that are to be guaranteed by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Appraiser 

5 Choice Act’’. 
2

•HR 1500 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SELECTION OF APPRAISERS FOR PURPOSES OF 

2 HOME LOANS GUARANTEED BY THE DEPART3 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY FOR BORROWER TO SELECT AP5 PRAISER.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 3731 of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(b)(1) A veteran applying for a housing loan for 

8 which an appraisal is required for the purposes of this 

9 chapter may select the appraiser for such purpose. If a 

10 veteran declines to select an appraiser when an appraisal 

11 is required for the purposes of this chapter, the Secretary 

12 shall select the appraiser. Any such selection by a veteran 

13 or by the Secretary shall be made from a list required by 

14 subsection (a)(3). Selection of appraisers by the Secretary 

15 under this paragraph shall be made on a rotating basis.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall take effect at the end of the 60-day 

18 period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

19 (c) STYLISTIC AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

20 Such section is further amended—

21 (1) in subsection (a)(3)—

22 (A) by striking ‘‘clause (1) of this sub23 section’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (1)’’; and 

24 (B) by striking ‘‘clause (2) of this sub25 section’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; 
3

•HR 1500 IH 

1 (2) in subsections (b)(2), (c), (d), (e), and 

2 (f)(1), by striking ‘‘of this section’’ each place it ap3 pears; and 

4 (3) in subsection (f)—

5 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘para6 graphs (2) and (3) of this subsection’’ and in7 serting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; 

8 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘of this 

9 subsection’’; 

10 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

11 (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

12 (D) in paragraph (4), as so redesignated—

13 (i) by striking ‘‘paragraph (4) of this 

14 subsection’’ in the matter preceding sub15 paragraph (A) and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

16 (3)’’; and 

17 (ii) by striking ‘‘of this subsection’’ in 

18 subparagraph (B).

Æ
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-07-009 April 4, 2007

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE AT

SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Tennessee Valley

Authority officials April 10 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Sequoyah nuclear power plant, located near Soddy-Daisy, Tenn., for the calendar year 2006.

The 1:00 p.m. meeting will be held at the Soddy-Daisy Municipal Building, located at 9835

Dayton Pike in Soddy-Daisy, and is open to public observation. Before the meeting ends, NRC staff

will be available to answer public questions on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s

role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff assesses the performance of the Sequoyah plant and all of the

nation’s other commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. 

“This meeting gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and

with residents near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer

any questions people may have about our oversight.”

The report says the Sequoyah plant operated safely during 2006. The NRC uses color-coded

inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant performance. The colors start

with “green” and increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of

the issues involved. Both Sequoyah reactors received “green” inspection findings from the NRC

during 2006, which means that all were of low safety significance. As a result, Sequoyah will receive

the baseline, or normal, level of NRC inspections during 2007. NRC inspectors will also conduct nonroutine inspections of the plant’s independent spent fuel (dry cask) storage facility, containment

emergency recirculation sump blockage modifications, and reactor pressure vessel head and

penetration nozzle examinations.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/seq_2006q4.pdf .

 Current performance information for Sequoyah Unit 1 is available on the NRC’s web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ1/seq1_chart.html and at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ1/seq2_chart.html for Sequoyah Unit 2 .
###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—FUNDING
# L_2017189EN.01005801.xml

| 20.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 189/58

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 38/2016

of 5 February 2016

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1321]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2231 of 2 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standards 16 and 38 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2231 of 2 December 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008 adopting certain international accounting standards in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards International Accounting Standards 16 and 38 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 10ba (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1126/2008) of Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 2231: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2231 of 2 December 2015 (OJ L 317, 3.12.2015, p. 19).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 2231: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/2231 of 2 December 2015 (OJ L 317, 3.12.2015, p. 19).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2015/2231 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 6 February 2016, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 317, 3.12.2015, p. 19.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-08-0036 - Denial of Two Petitions for Rulemaking Concerning the Environmental Impacts of High-Density Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Spent Fuel Pools (PRM-51-10 and PRM-51-12)

Accession Number: ML080170587

Date Released: Friday, August 8, 2008

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML080170604 - SECY-08-0036 - Denial of Two Petitions for Rulemaking Concerning the Environmental Impacts of High-Density Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Spent Fuel Pools (PRM-51-10 and PRM-51-12) (11 page(s), 3/7/2008)
    - ML080170641 - SECY-08-0036 - Enclosure 1:  Final Rule on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 51-10 and PRM 51-12 Denial (35 page(s), 3/7/2008)
    - ML080170663 - SECY-08-0036- Enclosure 2:  Letter to MA Attorney General  re: Denial of PRM 51-10 (3 page(s), 3/7/2008)
    - ML080200003 - SECY-08-0036 - Enclosure 3:  Letter to CA Attorney General  re: Denial of PRM 51-12 (3 page(s), 3/7/2008)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 10.11  


EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

between Stephen R. Brunner ("Executive") and

Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation ("Company"),

dated effective February 1, 2003  


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an "Executive Employment Agreement" bearing an original "Effective
Date" of February 1, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS, February 1, 2004, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the "Renewal Date" in that Executive Employment Agreement;
and 


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as
to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit February 1, 2006); and 



        WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce
Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and 


        WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and after the date of
this Extension Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the
experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and 


        WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and
approved by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Company. 


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, and in consideration of the sum
of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows: 


        1.     The
Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an "Effective Date" of February 1, 2003 and a "Renewal Date" which is deemed herein to be
February 1, 2004, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2005 and ending January 31, 2006, unless such employment period is
hereafter further extended for an additional period by both Executive and Company. 



        2.     All
provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company dated as of February 1, 2003, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full
force and effect 








without
change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2004. 



	 	 	POGO PRODUCING COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/S/ JOHN O. McCOY, JR.
 John O. McCoy, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	

ATTEST:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/S/ JOE ANN KINGDON
 Assistant Corporate Secretary	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

EMPLOYEE:
	

 	
 	

/S/ STEPHEN R. BRUNNER
 Stephen R. Brunner

Executive Vice President—Operations