alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0080 - Proposed Rulemaking -- Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.44, "Combustible Gas Control in Containment" (WITS 20010003)

Accession Number: ML021080664

Date Released: Monday, May 20, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021080576 - SECY-02-0080 - Proposed Rulemaking -- Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.44, "Combustible Gas Control in Containment" (WITS 20010003) (10 page(s), 5/13/2002)
    - ML021080720 - SECY-02-0080-Attachment 1-Proposed Rule on Combutible Gas Control in Containment (34 page(s), 5/13/2002)
    - ML021080807 - SECY-02-0080-Attachment 2-Regulatory Analysis for 50.44 (36 page(s), 5/13/2002)
    - ML021080834 - SECY-02-0080-Attachment 3-Regulatory Guide - DG-1117 - Control of Combutible Gas Concentrations in Containment (8 page(s), 3/1/2002)
    - ML021080850 - SECY-02-0080-Attachment 4-Draft Revision to Standard Review Plan - NUREG-0800 in Conjunction with Risk-Informed Revision to 50.44 (11 page(s), 5/13/2002)
    - ML021090013 - SECY-02-0080-Attach. 5-Prop. Safety Evaluation - NRC/NRR Consolidated Line Item Improvement Technical Specification Task Force Change TSTF-xxx Elimination of Requirements for Hydrogen Recombiners & Change of Requirements for Hydrogen and Oxygen Monitors (13 page(s), 5/13/2002)
    - ML020590489 - Draft Proposed Changes to Standard Technical Specifications Based on Draft Rulemaking for Risk-Informed 10 CFR 50.44, Combustible Gas Control (TAC No. MB1080) (38 page(s), 2/27/2002)
    - ML021090022 - SECY-02-0080-Attachment 7-Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner (PAR) Requirements for PWRs: Value Impact Assessment (9 page(s), 5/13/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 293.510 Disposition of Employee Medical Folders. ( a ) When an employee transfers to another Federal agency, the EMF must be transferred to the gaining agency at the same time as the employee's OPF. The EMF is to be addressed only to the gaining agency's designated manager (medical, health, safety, or personnel officer, or other designee) of the EMFS.
( b ) When an employee is separated from the Federal service, the EMF must be forwarded to the NPRC with the OPF, using the instructions in § 293.307 of this part.
( c ) When a former Federal employee is re-employed by an agency, and that agency believes that an EMF exists, either at the last employing agency or at the NPRC, the agency will request the EMF, but no sooner than 30 days after the date of the new appointment. No EMFs will be routinely retrieved during the initial review process (as is done with the OPF) except when authority exists for the agency to require a medical evaluation prior to reaching a decision on employability. EMFs are to be transferred by the NPRC only to the agency-designated manager (medical, health, safety, or personnel, or other designee) shown on the request form.
<Page>

Exhibit 32.2            Section 906 Certification of CFO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill Moses, as
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


BY:  /s/ Merrill Moses
     -----------------
     Merrill Moses
     President and CFO
     May 21, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1855 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1855

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require home health 
  agencies participating in the Medicare Program to conduct criminal 
  background checks for all applicants for employment as patient care 
                               providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require home health 
  agencies participating in the Medicare Program to conduct criminal 
  background checks for all applicants for employment as patient care 
                               providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIRING MEDICARE HOME HEALTH AGENCIES TO CONDUCT CRIMINAL 
              BACKGROUND CHECKS ON ALL APPLICANTS FOR EMPLOYMENT AS 
              PATIENT CARE PROVIDERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1891(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395bbb(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(7) The agency submits to the Attorney General a criminal 
        background request described in section 124(a) of the 
        Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary and 
        Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 
        section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105-277) for each 
        applicant for employment in a position involved in direct 
        patient care.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to applications for employment made on or after 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
August 14, 2013

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

12 00 New Jersey Ave. , S. E

. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Exemption Authority of US Airways , Inc.

( Washington, DC

– Mexico City, Mexico )

(D ated August 22 , 20 11 ) (Docket DOT

- OST

- 200 3

- 15310 )

Dear Mr. Gretch:

On August 22 , 2011 , the Department of Tra nsportation (“Department”) issu ed US

Airways, Inc. (“ US Airways ”) exemption authority to provide s cheduled foreign air

transportation of persons, property and mail between Washington, D.C. and Mexico

City, Mexi co

. ( See Notice of Action Taken, August 22, 20 11 , Docket DOT

- OST

- 200 3

-

15310 (“Notice”).) The Notice stated that U S Airways would provide this service

pursuant to a codeshare arrangement with United Air Lines, Inc. ( “ United ” ) ; and granted

US Airways exemption authority through August 22, 2013

.

In accordance with the C onditions set forth in the Notice, US Airways hereb y

ad vises the Department that no longer provid es Washington, DC

– Mexico City service

via a codeshare with United , and does not intend to renew this exemption authority

. Accordingly, US Airways respectfully provides notice of dormancy with respect to the

Washington, DC

– Mexico City r oute.

Respectfully submitted,

Howard Kass

Vice President

, Legal and Government Affairs

Benjamin T. Slocum

Director

, Legal and Government Affairs

Attachment

cc: Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on August 14, 2013 , I cau sed to be served a copy of the foregoing

Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

urskr @state.gov ( Department of State)

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

vanessa.balgobin@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen @faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

karine. faden@united.com (United)

francis.heil@aa.com (American)

robert.wirick@aa.com (American)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@dowlohnes .com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian )

perkmann @ dowlohnes .com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

robert.lan d@jetblue.com (JetBlue)

msinick@ssd.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

ethan.blank@rjet.com (Republic)

robert.co hn@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@ hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

cefelts @fedex.com (FedEx)

nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar)

_________________________

Benjamin T. Slocum
## United States Court of Appeals
**For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________

No. 21

- 2758

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael Shawn McGuire

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________

Submitted: May 1 6 , 2022 Filed: May 19, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, STR AS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael McGuire received a 120

- month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to four counts of cyberstalking. See 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2). An Anders brief
suggests that the sentence is substantiv ely unreasonable and that he should not have
received a fine

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A pro se supplemental brief raises two other issues.-2- Neither the sentence nor the fine poses a problem. The record establishes that

t he district court 1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461

– 62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). T he record further establishes that the district court did not clearly err when it found that McGuire was “able to pay [the] fine.” United States v. Allmon , 500 F.3d 800, 807 (8th Cir. 2007) (quoting U.S.S.G. § 5E1.2(a) ).

McGuire’s pro se argum ents fare no better. He forfeited his d ouble -j eopardy
argument when he ple ad ed guilty

, s ee United States v. Broce , 488 U.S. 563, 571 (1989) ; and there has been no impermissible double counting

, see United States v.
Jones , 951 F.3d 918, 919

– 20 (8th Cir. 2020).

Finally, we have independently reviewed the record and conclude that no
other non

- frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83 (1988). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw.

______________________________

1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Petrus Lodestijn, Chief Executive Officer of Aqua Society,
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005, and to which this
      certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

| | By:    | /s/
      Petrus Lodestijn
| | ------ | --------------------------
| |        |                           
| | Name:  | PETRUS LODESTIJN          
| |        |                           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer   
| |        |                           
| | Date:  | March 18, 2006            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SEPTEMBER 30, 
1996 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,705
<PP&E>                                          14,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,129
<SALES>                                         35,553
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,428
<CGS>                                           20,961
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                       568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,963
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                             Office of Public Affairs, Region I

                                        475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.www.nrc.gov 

No. I-07-001 January 8, 2007Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED TO THE PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Michael Brownas the new resident inspector at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station in Delta, Pa.  He joins NRCSenior Resident Inspector Fred Bower at the two-unit site.

He replaces Dan Schroeder who was promoted to senior resident inspector at Salem Station inHancock’s Bridge, N.J.

Brown first joined the NRC in May 2004 as an operations engineer in the Division of ReactorSafety the Region I office in King of Prussia, Pa.  Prior to joining the agency, he worked as an NRC-licensed shift supervisor at Plant Vogtle in Georgia; and as a contractor licensed operator instructor atvarious nuclear power plants around the country.  He earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanicalengineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology.

“Mike Brown has the experience and dedication to carry out NRC’s commitment of protectpeople and the environment," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors to independentlymonitor activities at the plants.  They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conductinginspections, monitoring major work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Peach Bottom resident inspectors can be reached at 717/456-7614.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 734.303 Fundraising. An employee may not knowingly: ( a ) Personally solicit, accept or receive a political contribution from another person, except under the circumstances specified in § 734.208(b);
( b ) Personally solicit political contributions in a speech or keynote address given at a fundraiser;
( c ) Allow his or her official title to be used in connection with fundraising activities; or
( d ) Solicit, accept, or receive uncompensated volunteer services from an individual who is a subordinate.
Example 1: An employee may not host a fundraiser at his or her home. However, a spouse who is not covered under this part may host such a fundraiser and the employee may attend. The employee may not personally solicit contributions to the fundraiser. Moreover, the employee may not accept, or receive political contributions, except under the circumstances stated in § 734.208(b).
Example 2: An employee's name may not appear on an invitation to a fundraiser as a sponsor of the fundraiser, or as a point of contact for the fundraiser.
Example 3: An employee may not ask a subordinate employee to volunteer on behalf of a partisan political campaign.
Example 4: An employee may not call the personnel office of a business or corporation and request that the corporation or business provide volunteers or services for a campaign. However, an employee may call an individual who works for a business or corporation and request that specific individual's services for a campaign.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-067 April 15, 2005

NRC APPROVES EXTENDED POWER UPRATE FOR

WATERFORD NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Entergy Nuclear South to

increase the generating capacity of the Waterford nuclear power plant by approximately 8 percent. The

NRC staff’s review determined that Entergy can safely increase the reactor’s power output after

upgrading several plant components and complying with a license condition. Entergy must submit an

amendment for NRC review and approval to account for instrument uncertainty.

NRC staff also reviewed Entergy’s evaluations that showed the plant’s design can handle the

increased power level. The NRC's safety evaluation focused on several areas, including nuclear steam

supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems, accident evaluations,

radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

Extended power uprates involve significant modifications to plant equipment such as the high

pressure turbines, main generators, and/or transformers. The power uprate at the plant, located 20 miles

west of New Orleans, La., will increase the plant’s generating capacity from approximately 1075 to

1143 megawatts electric. The licensee intends to implement the uprate following its spring refueling

outage.

NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal Register,

providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No comments or hearing requests

were received by the NRC. The agency’s evaluation of the Waterford uprate will be available through

the NRC’s ADAMS electronic document database by entering ML051030082 on this Web page:

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm .

###
1 Introduction and Plan Contents

Page 1-18 Petrobras America Inc. Development Operations Coordination Document Cascade / Chinook Development Project 

### 1(c) Safety and Pollution Prevention Features PAI has and will comply with the BOEM safety and pollution prevention requirements described in the following subparts of 30 CFR 250, as well as supporting NTLs :  Subpart C – Pollution Prevention and Control  Subpart D – Oil and Gas Drilling Operations  Subpart E – Oil and Gas Well Completion Operations  Subpart H – Oil and Gas Production Safety Systems  Subpart I – Platforms and Structures  Subpart J – Pipelines and Pipelines Rights-of-Way  Subpart O – Well Control and Production Safety Training PAI has and will comply with the USCG safety and pollution prevention requirements for US and foreign flagged vessels (as appropriate) described in :  33 CFR Subchapter O – Pollution  USCG Policy Letters  Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA90)  International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73/78) with amendments, including Annex I, Annex II, Annex IV, Annex V, and Annex VI (*)  SOLAS 1974 (*) (*) For foreign flagged FPSO PAI has and will comply with the EPA regulations regarding the disposal of oil and gas operational wastes, including : 40 CFR 55 – OCS Air Regulations 40 CFR 112 – Oil Pollution Prevention 40 CFR 122 - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)  Clean Water Act