alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



Chief Executive Officer



I, John Long, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN LONG          
|                     |  |  |  | John Long              
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
### §284. Damages

Upon finding for the claimant the court shall award the claimant damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court.

When the damages are not found by a jury, the court shall assess them. In either event the court may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed. Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d).

The court may receive expert testimony as an aid to the determination of damages or of what royalty would be reasonable under the circumstances.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4507(9)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–566; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 335.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§67 and 70, part (R.S. 4919; R.S. 4921, amended (1) Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 391, §6, 29 Stat. 694, (2) Feb. 18, 1922, ch. 58, §8, 42 Stat. 392, (3) Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 726, §1, 60 Stat. 778).

This section consolidates the provisions relating to damages in R.S. 4919 and 4921, with some changes in language.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Second par. Pub. L. 112–29 struck out "of this title" after "154(d)".

1999—Second par. Pub. L. 106–113 inserted at end "Increased damages under this paragraph shall not apply to provisional rights under section 154(d) of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective Nov. 29, 2000, and applicable only to applications (including international applications designating the United States) filed on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4508] of Pub. L. 106–113, as amended, set out as a note under section 10 of this title.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Gregory J. Scott, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New York & Company, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: June 9, 2011

/s/ GREGORY J. SCOTT Gregory J. Scott Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
### §12542. Rural drug enforcement training

#### (a) Specialized training for rural officers

The Director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center shall develop a specialized course of instruction devoted to training law enforcement officers from rural agencies in the investigation of drug trafficking and related crimes.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out subsection (a)—

(1) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1996;

(2) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1997;

(3) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;

(4) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1999; and

(5) $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2000.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XVIII, §180103, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14082 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center of the Department of the Treasury to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(4), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**Statement explaining how earnings per share information was calculated in this annual report**

The calculation of theearnings per share attributable to the equity holders of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is based on the income attributable to the equity holders of the Company of RMB2,881,461,000, RMB3,154,317,000 andRMB1,386,686,000 and on the weighted average number of 4,918,400,000 shares, 4,743,606,557 shares and 4,592,000,000 shares in issue, respectively, during the years. 

The weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purpose of calculating basic earnings per share for all the period presented has been adjusted for the bonus issue of the Company on July 27, 2005.

The earnings per ADS have been calcualted based on the net income for the relevant periods and on one ADS being, equivalent to 50 shares, which has beenadjusted for the bonus issue of the Company on July 27, 2005. 

No diluted earnings per share has been presented as there are no dilutive potentialshares in issue during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of LeRoy W. Fairchild, Deceased. Fermene G. Fairchild, as Executrix of Harry P. Fairchild, Deceased, et al., Appellants-Respondents; Mabel H. Fairchild, Individually and as Surviving Executrix of LeRoy C. Fairchild, Deceased, et al., Respondents-Appellants; United States Trust Company of New York et al., Respondents.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 705.]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00489-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Ruben G. ELIZONDO Jr.,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 657461

Honorable Melissa Vara, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 15, 2021, Ruben G. Elizondo Jr. moved the trial court to dismiss his case for 

want of a speedy trial. 

On October 19, 2021, the trial court granted the motion and dismissed the case with 

prejudice. But on October 21, 2021, during the period of its plenary power, the trial court 

rescinded its October 19, 2021 order, denied Elizondo’s motion to dismiss, and set his trial for 

November 29, 2021. 

On November 5, 2021, the State filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s October 19, 

2021 order. See State v. Richardson, 383 S.W.3d 544, 547 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (“Article

44.01(a)(1) allows the state to appeal a decision ‘dismiss[ing] . . . any portion of an indictment.’”

(alterations in original) (quoting TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.01(a))).

Given the trial court’s rescission of its October 19, 2021 order, the clerk’s record does not 

appear to contain an appealable order or judgment. Contra TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 

44.01. 

We ORDER the State to show cause in writing not later than TWENTY DAYS from the 

date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 ofthe *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, that:1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the *SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934*; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Allan J. Kent    Allan J. Kent   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

#### § 591.243 How many members are on each COLA Advisory Committee?

A COLA Advisory Committee has up to 12 members composed of OPM representatives and other agency and employee representatives, unless OPM determines that the committee should be larger. In determining the number of committee members, OPM considers the amount of work the committee is likely to be requested to do (based on the size and complexity of the local living-cost survey) and the availability of employee and agency representatives to participate as committee members.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-146 November 29, 2006

 

NRC INVITES NOMINATIONS FOR 

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking nominations for the position of radiation

therapy medical physicist on the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes (ACMUI).

Nominees must be U.S. citizens and able to devote approximately 160 hours per year to committee

business. The position is for a four-year term beginning Oct. 1, 2007, with possible reappointment to

an additional term.

The ACMUI was established in 1958 and advises NRC on policy and technical issues related to

the regulation of the medical use of radioactive material. Responsibilities include providing comments

on changes to NRC rules, regulations and guidance documents; evaluating certain non-routine uses of

radioactive material; providing technical assistance in licensing, inspection, and enforcement cases;

and bringing key issues to the attention of the NRC for appropriate action.

Members who are not federal employees are compensated for their service; all members are

reimbursed for travel. Nominees undergo a security background check and are required to complete

financial disclosure statements to avoid possible conflict-of-interest issues.

ACMUI members possess the medical and technical skills needed to address evolving issues.

The current committee membership is comprised of the following professionals: (a) nuclear medicine

physician; (b) nuclear cardiologist; (c) medical physicist in nuclear medicine, unsealed byproduct

material; (d) therapy medical physicist; (e) radiation safety officer; (f) nuclear pharmacist; (g) two

radiation oncologists; (h) patients’ rights advocate; (i) Food and Drug Administration representative;

(j) Agreement State representative; and (k) health care administrator. 

Interested candidates should submit four copies of their resumé to the Office of Human

Resources, Attn: Ms. Joyce Riner, Mail Stop T2D32, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington D.C. 20555.
Applications will be accepted for 60 days following publication of a call for nominations in the

Federal Register. For more information, contact Mohammad S. Saba, in the NRC’s Office of Federal

and State Materials and Environmental Management Program, at (301) 415-7608 or via e-mail at

mss@nrc.gov . 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Group Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard J. Wehrle, Vice President & Corporate Controller of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

| May 6, 2011 | /s/ Richard  J. Wehrle                     |
|-------------|--------------------------------------------|
|        | Richard  J. Wehrle                         |
|        | Vice  President & Corporate Controller |
|        | (Principal  Accounting Officer)            |
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0176 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Development of Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models.

Accession Number: ML072070469

Date Released: Monday, October 22, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML072070431 - SECY-07-0176 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Development of Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Models. (4 page(s), 10/3/2007)
    - ML072070451 - SECY-07-0176 Enclosure 1 - Status of the Accident Sequence Precursor Program and the Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Model Development Program. (8 page(s), 10/3/2007)
    - ML072070464 - SECY-07-0176 Enclosure 2 - Results, Trends, and Insights from the Accident Sequence Precursor Program. (11 page(s), 10/3/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Order entered September 17 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01072
- CR
JAMES CRAWFORD, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 86th District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 30096
- 422



### O RDER Before the Court are appellant’s motion for rehearing and appellant’s motion requesting a copy of the trial record. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is OVERRULED

. Appellant’s motion to request trial records is GRANTED IN PART

.

We OR DER appellant’s counsel, J. Daniel Oliphant , to deliver, in paper format, copies of the portions of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record relevant to the issues raised on appeal which would include the following:

1. The amended indictment;

2. The trial court’ s charge to the jury;3. The jury’s verdicts;

4. The judgment; and

5. The reporter’s record of the entire trial except voir dire.
To reduce the amount of paper and cost involved, counsel may print this material on both sides of each sheet of paper and may print it in a format so that not more than two pages of the record appear on each side of the page.

.

We ORDER Mr. Oliphant to file with this Court, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, written verification that he has sent a paper copy of the record to appellant.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to J. Daniel Oliphant, and by first

- class mail to James Crawford.

/David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
§ 6601.102 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) Before engaging in any outside employment with a prohibited source within the meaning of 5 CFR 2635.203(d), whether or not for compensation, an employee other than a special Government employee must obtain written approval from his or her immediate supervisor and the Designated Agency Ethics Official. The request for approval shall include the following: ( 1 ) A brief description of the employee's official duties, a brief description of the proposed outside employment (including the name of the person, group or other organization for whom the work is to be performed), and a brief description of the employee's discipline or inherent area of expertise based on experience or educational background; and
( 2 ) Responses to the following questions: ( i ) Whether the proposed outside employment will draw on non-public information or pertain to a matter to which the employee is presently assigned or has been assigned within the last year;
( ii ) Whether the proposed outside employment pertains to an ongoing or announced agency policy or program;
( iii ) Whether the proposed outside employment will involve teaching a course which is part of the established curriculum of an accredited institution of higher education, secondary school, elementary school, or an education or training program sponsored by a Federal, State or local government entity;
( iv ) Whether the sponsor of the proposed outside employment has any interests before the NEH that may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the employee's duties;
( v ) Whether the employee intends to refer to his or her official NEH position during the proposed outside employment, and, if so, the text of any disclaimers that he or she will use; and
( vi ) Whether the employee will receive any payment or compensation for the proposed activity, and, if so, how much.
( b ) Approval shall be granted only upon determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635.
( c ) Outside employment means any form of compensated or uncompensated non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the employee. It includes, but is not limited to, personal services such as acting as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher or speaker. It includes writing done under arrangement with another person for production or publication of any written product.