alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 551.101 General. ( a ) The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended (referred to as “the Act” or “FLSA”), provides minimum standards for both wages and overtime entitlements, and administrative procedures by which covered worktime must be compensated. Included in the Act are provisions related to child labor, equal pay, and portal-to-portal activities. In addition, the Act exempts specified employees or groups of employees from the application of certain of its provisions and prescribes penalties for the commission of specifically prohibited acts.
( b ) This part contains the regulations, criteria, and conditions set forth by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) as prescribed by the Act, supplements and implements the Act, and must be read in conjunction with it.
( c ) OPM's administration of the Act must comply with the terms of the Act but the law does not require OPM's regulations to mirror the Department of Labor's FLSA regulations. OPM's administration of the Act must be consistent with the Department of Labor's administration of the Act only to the extent practicable and only to the extent that this consistency is required to maintain compliance with the terms of the Act. For example, while OPM's executive, administrative, and professional exemption criteria are consistent with the Department of Labor's exemption criteria, OPM does not apply the highly compensated employee criteria in 29 CFR 541.601 to determine FLSA exemption status.
### §21131. Additional regional computer forensic labs

#### (a) Additional resources

The Attorney General shall establish additional computer forensic capacity to address the current backlog for computer forensics, including for child exploitation investigations. The Attorney General may utilize funds under this subchapter to increase capacity at existing regional forensic laboratories or to add laboratories under the Regional Computer Forensic Laboratories Program operated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

#### (b) Purpose of new resources

The additional forensic capacity established by resources provided under this section shall be dedicated to assist Federal agencies, State and local Internet Crimes Against Children task forces, and other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies in preventing, investigating, and prosecuting Internet crimes against children.

#### (c) New computer forensic labs

If the Attorney General determines that new regional computer forensic laboratories are required under subsection (a) to best address existing backlogs, such new laboratories shall be established pursuant to subsection (d).

#### (d) Location of new labs

The location of any new regional computer forensic laboratories under this section shall be determined by the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Regional Computer Forensic Laboratory National Steering Committee, and other relevant stakeholders.

#### (e) Report

Not later than 1 year after October 13, 2008, and every year thereafter, the Attorney General shall submit a report to the Congress on how the funds appropriated under this section were utilized.

#### (f) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years 2009 through 2013, $2,000,000 to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Pub. L. 110–401, title II, §201, Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4241.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 17631 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §383. Resistance of pirates by merchant vessels

The commander and crew of any merchant vessel of the United States, owned wholly, or in part, by a citizen thereof, may oppose and defend against any aggression, search, restraint, depredation, or seizure, which shall be attempted upon such vessel, or upon any other vessel so owned, by the commander or crew of any armed vessel whatsoever, not being a public armed vessel of some nation in amity with the United States, and may subdue and capture the same; and may also retake any vessel so owned which may have been captured by the commander or crew of any such armed vessel, and send the same into any port of the United States.

(R.S. §4295.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4295 derived from acts Mar. 3, 1819, ch. 77, §3, 3 Stat. 513; Jan. 30, 1823, ch. 7, 3 Stat. 721.
#### Giovanni Giuntini, Appellant, v. Alex Thompson, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that plaintiff is shown to be a resident of Hew York county. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Clara N. Karibe (Formerly Clara N. Earle), Appellant, to Enforce the Payment of Alimony, etc., v. Edward Earle, Respondent.

Order affirmed. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Dowling, J., dissented.
**Seeking Common Ground,** a partnership of private landowners, livestock, wildlife and professional organizations, as well as federal, state and local resource management agencies, has been closed. Please contact the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation for information about past Seeking Common Ground projects.

The **National Fish and Wildlife Foundation** is a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting improved conservation and sustainable use of our nation's natural resources. Its goals are conservation education, natural resource management, habitat protection, ecosystem restoration, and public policy development. NFWF meets these goals by developing partnerships between the public and private sectors and supporting conservation activities that address the root causes of environmental problems.

National Fish and Wildlife Foundation                                1120 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 900                                Washington, DC 20036                                Telephone: 202/857-0166                                Fax: 202/857-0162                                e-mail: [email protected]
### §3842. Investigations and inspections by Secretary

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may conduct investigations and inspections regarding a vessel's compliance with this chapter or the Convention.

#### (b) Violations; subpoenas

#### (1) In general

In any investigation under this section, the Secretary may issue a subpoena to require the attendance of a witness or the production of documents or other evidence if—

(A) before the issuance of the subpoena, the Secretary requests a determination by the Attorney General of the United States as to whether the subpoena will interfere with a criminal investigation; and

(B) the Attorney General—

(i) determines that the subpoena will not interfere with a criminal investigation; or

(ii) fails to make a determination under clause (i) before the date that is 30 days after the date on which the Secretary makes a request under subparagraph (A).

#### (2) Enforcement

In the case of refusal to obey a subpoena issued to any person under this subsection, the Secretary may request the Attorney General to invoke the aid of the appropriate district court of the United States to compel compliance.

#### (c) Further action

On completion of an investigation, the Secretary may take whatever further action the Secretary considers appropriate under the Convention or this chapter.

#### (d) Cooperation

The Secretary may cooperate with other parties to the Convention in the detection of violations and in enforcement of the Convention. Nothing in this section affects or alters requirements under any other laws.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1032, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3028.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this title", meaning title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3023, which enacted this chapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title X to the Code, see Tables.
§ 2634.205 Special waiver of public reporting requirements. ( a ) *General rule.* In unusual circumstances, the Director of the Office of Government Ethics may grant a request for a waiver of the public reporting requirements under this subpart for an individual who is reasonably expected to perform, or has performed, the duties of an office or position for fewer than 130 days in a calendar year, but only if the Director determines that: ( 1 ) The individual is a special Government employee, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a), who performs temporary duties either on a full-time or intermittent basis;
( 2 ) The individual is able to provide services specially needed by the Government;
( 3 ) It is unlikely that the individual's outside employment or financial interests will create a conflict of interest; and
( 4 ) Public financial disclosure by the individual is not necessary under the circumstances.
( b ) *Procedure.* ( 1 ) Requests for waivers must be submitted to the Office of Government Ethics, via the requester's agency, within 10 days after an employee learns that the employee will hold a position which requires reporting and that the employee will serve in that position for more than 60 days in any calendar year, or upon serving in such a position for more than 60 days, whichever is earlier.
( 2 ) The request must consist of: ( i ) A cover letter which identifies the individual and the position, states the approximate number of days in a calendar year which the employee expects to serve in that position, and requests a waiver of public reporting requirements under this section;
( ii ) An enclosure which states the reasons for the individual's belief that the conditions of paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section are met in the particular case; and
( iii ) The report otherwise required by this subpart, as a factual basis for the determination required by this section. The report must bear the legend: “CONFIDENTIAL: WAIVER REQUEST PENDING PURSUANT TO 5 CFR 2634.205.”
( 3 ) The agency in which the individual serves must advise the Office of Government Ethics as to the justification for a waiver.
( 4 ) In the event a waiver is granted, the report will not be subject to the public disclosure requirements of § 2634.603; however, the waiver request cover letter will be subject to those requirements. In the event that a waiver is not granted, the confidential legend will be removed from the report, and the report will be subject to public disclosure; however, the waiver request cover letter will not then be subject to public disclosure.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 187

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 

2000 to allow for the financing of agricultural sales to Cuba. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on International Relations and Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 to allow for the financing of agricultural sales to Cuba.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TRADE SANCTIONS REFORM 

4 AND EXPORT ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2000. 

5 Section 908 of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Ex6 port Enhancement Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7207) is 

7 amended—

8 (1) by striking subsection (b); 
2

•HR 187 IH 

1 (2) in subsection (a)—

2 (A) by striking ‘‘PROHIBITION’’ and all 

3 that follows through ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘IN GENERAL.—’’; 

5 (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as sub6 section (b) (and conforming the margin accord7 ingly); and 

8 (C) by redesignating paragraph (3) as sub9 section (c) (and conforming the margin accord10 ingly); 

11 (3) in subsection (b) (as redesignated), by strik12 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’; 

13 and 

14 (4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated), by strik15 ing ‘‘paragraph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’.

Æ
### §40501. Program authorized

#### (a) In general

#### (1) Grants authorized

The Attorney General may award grants to eligible entities described in paragraph (2) to enable the eligible entities to improve the transportation, processing, identification, and reporting of missing persons and unidentified remains, including migrants.

#### (2) Eligible entities

Eligible entities described in this paragraph are the following:

(A) States and units of local government.

(B) Accredited, publicly funded, Combined DNA Index System (commonly known as "CODIS") forensic laboratories, which demonstrate the grant funds will be used for DNA typing and uploading biological family DNA reference samples, including samples from foreign nationals, into CODIS, subject to the protocols for inclusion of such forensic DNA profiles into CODIS, and the privacy protections required under section 40502(c) of this title.

(C) Medical examiners offices.

(D) Accredited, publicly funded toxicology laboratories.

(E) Accredited, publicly funded crime laboratories.

(F) Publicly funded university forensic anthropology laboratories.

(G) Nonprofit organizations that have working collaborative agreements with State and county forensic offices, including medical examiners, coroners, and justices of the peace, for entry of data into CODIS or the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (commonly known as "NamUs"), or both.

(Pub. L. 106–177, title II, §202, as added Pub. L. 116–277, §2(a)(1), Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3368.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 40501, Pub. L. 106–177, title II, §202, Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 36, authorized Attorney General to provide grant awards to States to enable States to improve the reporting of unidentified and missing persons, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–277, §2(a)(1), Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3368. Such section was formerly classified to section 14661 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as section 40501.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of title II of Pub. L. 106–177, which is classified to this chapter, as "Jennifer's Law", see section 201 of Pub. L. 106–177, set out as a Short Title of 2000 Act note under section 10101 of this title.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 29 7 . PI TTMAN v . THE STATE.

Th i s cas e was do ck et ed b y t h is co u rt o n Sep t em b er 1 1, 20 2 0
, an d ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n s o f erro r were d u e Oct o b er 1
, 2 0 2 0

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s

o rd er, ap p el l an t s t i l l h as n o t fi l ed a b ri ef an d en u m erat i o n o f e r r o rs an d h as n ot

req u es t ed an ex t en si o n o f t i m e i n wh i ch t o d o s o. Acco rd i ng l y , t h i s ap p eal is h ereb y DISM ISSED as ab an d on ed p u rs u an t t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru les 1 3 an d 2 3

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 10, 2020

11/10/2020
# L_2016211EN.01008201.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/82

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 121/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1304]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/191 of 5 February 2015 amending Decision 2010/670/EU as regards the extension of certain time limits laid down in Article 9 and Article 11(1) of that Decision (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/191 of 5 February 2015 amending Decision 2010/670/EU as regards the extension of certain time limits laid down in Article 9 and Article 11(1) of that Decision (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 21ald (Commission Decision 2010/670/EU) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32015 D 0191: Commission Decision (EU) 2015/191 of 5 February 2015 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 31).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32015 D 0191: Commission Decision (EU) 2015/191 of 5 February 2015 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 31).’

Article 2

The text of Decision (EU) 2015/191 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 31.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §12521. Increased penalties for drug-dealing in "drug-free" zones

Pursuant to its authority under section 994 of title 28, the United States Sentencing Commission shall amend its sentencing guidelines to provide an appropriate enhancement for a defendant convicted of violating section 860 of title 21.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, §90102, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14051 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is comprised of section 90102 of Pub. L. 103–322 which is also listed in a table relating to sentencing guidelines set out under section 994 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I,
Dror David, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

1.
          This Annual Report on Form 20-F of Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. (the
          Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2009

| |                        
| | -----------------------
|
|
|
|
| | /s/ Dror David         
| | Dror David             
| | Chief Financial Officer



---

---
#### Nassau Cottage and Realty Company, Appellant, v. Estates of Long Beach, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-008 February 23, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC, COMPANY TO DISCUSS LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION

CONDUCTED AT NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 The results of a Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection of the aging management program for

Units 1 and 2 of the Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant will be discussed on Thursday, March 3, at a meeting

between NRC officials and the facility’s management. The inspection is part of an NRC review of a license

renewal application for the plant, which is located in Scriba, N.Y., and operated by Constellation Energy

Group. That application is still under review.

 The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at the Town of Scriba Assembly Hall, 42 Creamery Road

in Oswego, N.Y. Members of the public are invited to observe and will have an opportunity to pose questions

to NRC officials before the session is adjourned.

 In May 2004, Constellation Energy applied to the NRC for a 20-year extension of the operating

licenses for the Nine Mile Point units. One important aspect of the NRC license renewal process is to ensure

that a plant manages the effects of aging equipment through an effective monitoring and maintenance program. 

The NRC has found that a successful program will permit safe operation for an additional 20 years beyond its

initial license period of 40 years.

 The current operating license for Nine Mile Point Unit 1 is due to expire on Aug. 22, 2009, while the

current operating license for Nine Mile Point Unit 2 is scheduled to terminate on Oct. 31, 2026.

 A copy of the Nine Mile Point license renewal application is available via the NRC’s web site at:

www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/nine-mile-pt.html . Additional information

about the license renewal process is available at: www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

 ###
### SUBCHAPTER XXXIX—PREVENTION, INVESTIGATION, AND PROSECUTION OF WHITE COLLAR CRIME
### subpart 2—family unity demonstration project for federal prisoners
#### United Security Corporation, Respondent, v. Isadore Suchman, Appellant.

—• Determination affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J. Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.; Callahan and Bergan, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the determination of the Appellate Term and reinstate the intermediate and final orders of the Municipal Court for the reasons assigned in the opinion of Eder, J., at the Appellate Term. [See *post,*p. 760.]
EXHIBIT  32.2
-------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In  connection  with  the  Amended Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
Hope,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18, U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

1)   The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and

2)   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  presented  in  this  Report.



Date:  November  2,  2004              /s/  David  Scott
                                       -----------------
                                       David  Scott
                                       Chief  Financial  Officer