alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2040 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2040

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 to 
extend certain contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and certain 
  irrigation water contractors in the States of Wyoming and Nebraska.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2040

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 to 
extend certain contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and certain 
  irrigation water contractors in the States of Wyoming and Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN IRRIGATION PROJECT CONTRACTS.

    Section 2 of the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 
(112 Stat. 2816, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A-70) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 2005''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``beyond 
                December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``beyond December 31, 
                2005''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``prior to 
                December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``before December 31, 
                2005''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NRC AND PRAIRIE ISLAND INDIAN COMMUNITY SIGN 

 FIRST-OF-A KIND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 

On June 17, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Prairie Island Indian Community 

(PIIC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for working together to review potential 

environmental impacts of the proposed license renewal of the Prairie Island nuclear power plant 

located near Red Wing, Minn. This is the first MOU dealing with a reactor license renewal 

environmental review. 

The MOU describes each side’s roles and responsibilities as the NRC leads the review of the 

application to renew the operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 at the Prairie Island Nuclear 

Generating Plant. Eric Leeds, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, and 

PIIC Tribal Council President Ronald Johnson signed the memorandum. 

“We look forward to collaborating with the Prairie Island Indian Community,” Leeds said. 

“This close cooperation will lead to a more effective and complete environmental review before the 

NRC reaches a decision on renewing the plant’s license.” 

The MOU recognizes PIIC’s special expertise and information as it relates to historic and 

archeological resources, socioeconomics, land use, and environmental justice. The NRC will give 

the community copies of technical reports, data and other information that fall under the PIIC’s 

areas of interest, and the agency will give extra weight to the community’s comments in those areas. 

The agency retains final authority on the renewal decision. 

The complete text of the MOU is available in the NRC’s electronic document database, 

ADAMS, by entering ML081610273 on this Web page: 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. For more information contact Richard Plasse, 

telephone (301) 415-1427 or email, richard.plasse@nrc.gov. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-119 June 26, 2008
#### Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Percy Uris et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 876.]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-138 October 28, 2004

NRC RENEWS LICENSES FOR DRESDEN AND QUAD CITIES

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Dresden

Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, and the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2, in

Illinois for an additional 20 years. 

The Dresden plant is near Morris, and the Quad Cities plant is near Moline. Both are operated

by the Exelon Generation Co. Exelon submitted its license renewal applications for both plants on Jan.

3, 2003. With the renewals, the license for Dresden Unit 2 is extended to Dec. 22, 2029, and the license

for Dresden Unit 3 is extended to Jan. 12, 2031. The licenses for both units of Quad Cities are

extended to Dec. 14, 2032.

The NRC’s environmental reviews are described in site-specific supplements to the NRC’s

“Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants” (NUREG1437, Supplements 16 and 17). In the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements, issued in

June, the NRC concluded there were no environmental impacts that would preclude renewal of the

licenses for environmental reasons. Two public meetings to discuss the environmental review were

held near the plants on April 8 and 10, 2003.

The NRC staff completed a careful and thorough review and issued the results in July in its

“Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station,

Units 2 and 3, and the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2.” The staff concluded that

there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had

demonstrated the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. In addition, NRC conducted

inspections of the plants to verify information submitted by the licensee. The reports relating to these

renewals are available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/dresden-quad.html .

On Sept. 16, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards – an independent body of

technical experts which advises the Commission – issued its recommendation that the operating

licenses for Dresden and Quad Cities be renewed. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the

Safety Aspects of the License Renewal Application for the Dresden 2 and 3 and Quad Cities 1 and 2

Nuclear Power Stations.” This document is available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2004/ .
The Dresden and Quad Cities license renewals bring the total number of renewals to 30 reactor

units. A complete listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html .

###
#### New York Dock Company, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Present — Cars-well, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 775.]
### **CHAPTER 305—HATE CRIMES**

Sec.
30501.
Findings.
30502.
Definitions.
30503.
Support for criminal investigations and prosecutions by State, local, and tribal law enforcement officials.
30504.
Grant program.
30505.
Severability.
30506.
Rule of construction.
30507.
Jabara-Heyer NO HATE Act.
### §701b–6. Examinations and surveys by Secretary of Agriculture

That, in order to further the declaration of policy and principles declared in sections 701a and 701b of this title, and to supplement the preliminary examinations and surveys which the Secretary of the Army has heretofore been, or is hereafter, authorized and directed to make of waterways with a view to the control of their floods, the Secretary of Agriculture be, and he is, authorized and directed to cause preliminary examinations and surveys to be made for run-off and water-flow retardation and soil-erosion prevention on the watersheds of said waterways, the costs thereof to be paid from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for such purposes.

(Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 877, §3, 50 Stat. 877; Jan. 19, 1948, ch. 2, §1, 62 Stat. 4; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1948—Act Jan. 19, 1948, inserted "or is hereafter" after "heretofore been" to make section applicable to future preliminary surveys and examinations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Clyde Parks, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Moliris Corp., D/B/A
Advantage Packaging;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting. August 20, 2004

/s/ Clyde Parks
---------------------------
Clyde Parks
Principal Financial Officer

                                       28
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R.
Douglas Hutcherson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  
           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  
                   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                                              
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   March 31, 2005 | Signature  /s/ R. Douglas Hutcherson  Chief Executive Officer
# L_2016129EN.01003101.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 50/2015

of 20 March 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/733]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2014 of 12 September 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, as regards the substance ‘lufenuron’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2014 of 12 September 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010, as regards the substance ‘lufenuron’ (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0967: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2014 of 12 September 2014 (OJ L 272, 13.9.2014, p. 3).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0967: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2014 of 12 September 2014 (OJ L 272, 13.9.2014, p. 3).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 967/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 272, 13.9.2014, p. 3.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128413 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128413 

 COA: 253124 
 Wayne CC: 03-009943-01 

ANTHONY JEROME ANDERSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 17, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005 

Clerk
### §12522. Enhanced penalties for illegal drug use in Federal prisons and for smuggling drugs into Federal prisons

#### (a) Declaration of policy

It is the policy of the Federal Government that the use or distribution of illegal drugs in the Nation's Federal prisons will not be tolerated and that such crimes shall be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

#### (b) Sentencing guidelines

Pursuant to its authority under section 994 of title 28, the United States Sentencing Commission shall amend its sentencing guidelines to appropriately enhance the penalty for a person convicted of an offense—

(1) under section 844 of title 21 involving simple possession of a controlled substance within a Federal prison or other Federal detention facility; or

(2) under section 841(b) of title 21 involving the smuggling of a controlled substance into a Federal prison or other Federal detention facility or the distribution or intended distribution of a controlled substance within a Federal prison or other Federal detention facility.

#### (c) No probation

Notwithstanding any other law, the court shall not sentence a person convicted of an offense described in subsection (b) to probation.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title IX, §90103, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14052 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is comprised of section 90103 of Pub. L. 103–322. Subsec. (b) of section 90103 of Pub. L. 103–322 is also listed in a table relating to sentencing guidelines set out under section 994 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR 

DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on June 30 approved a request by FirstEnergy 

Nuclear Operating Company to increase the generating capacity of the Davis-Besse nuclear 

power plant by approximately 1.6 percent. The reactor is located about 21 miles east-southeast of 

Toledo, Ohio. 

 The NRC staff determined that FirstEnergy could safely increase the reactor’s output 

primarily through more accurate means of measuring feedwater flow. NRC staff also reviewed 

FirstEnergy’s evaluations showing the plant’s design can handle the increased power level. 

The NRC's safety evaluation of the plant’s proposed power uprate focused on several 

areas, such as the nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical 

systems, accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations and training, testing, and 

technical specification changes. 

The power uprate will increase Davis-Besse’s generating capacity from approximately 

893 to 905 megawatts electric. FirstEnergy intends to implement the uprate this summer. 

The NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal 

Register providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No requests were 

submitted. The agency’s evaluation of the Davis-Besse uprate is available through the NRC’s 

ADAMS electronic document database by entering ML081410652 on this Web page: 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-123 July 1, 2008
#### Leonie B. Luhman, Respondent, v. New York, Westchester and Boston Railway Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
**SECTION 302**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael Hart, certify that: 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of AMG Oil Ltd.; 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this year end report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this year end report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 29th day of December, 2003.

BY:
/s/ Michael Hart                        Michael Hart, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
<

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Abbeville-Grimes Railway Company, Inc.

This is the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board regarding the

status of the Abbeville-Grimes Railway Company, Inc. (A-G) as an

employer under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Acts.

The A-G was held to be an employer under the Acts effective March

1, 1989 (B.A. Number 5536) . The record establishes that A-G ceased

operations December 31, 1993 . It assets were sold to the Bay Line

Railroad, L.L.C.

Accordingly, the Board holds that the A-G ceased to be an employer

under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Acts effective December 31, 1993.

V." M.Vspeakman, Jrv

BCD 1996-35

BA # 5536