alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28009]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act that a virtual meeting of the Geriatrics 
and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on January 29, 2019, at 
10:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m. EST. The dial in number is 1-800-767-1750 with 
access code 78128#. This meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of VA and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters pertaining to 
geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the capability of VA 
health care facilities and programs to meet the medical, psychological, 
and social needs of older Veterans and evaluates VA programs designated 
as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's 
geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, 
updates on VA's employee staff working in the area of geriatrics (to 
include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans 
Health Administration (VHA) strategic planning activities in geriatrics 
and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and program 
advances in palliative care, and performance and oversight of VA 
Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide 
written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Alejandra 
Paulovich, Program Analyst, Geriatrics and Extended Care (10NC4), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e7a68b828d8689839586c9b786928b88918e848fa79186c9808891"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3f2dfd6d9d2ddd7c1d29de3d2c6dfdcc5dad0dbf3c5d29dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at (202) 
461-6016.

    Dated: December 19, 2018.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-28009 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32-2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Hesperia  Holding,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2002, as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Donald Shimp of the Company, certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.




                         Donald Shimp
                         President
                         August 27, 2003
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill
Moses, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

BY:  /S/ MERRILL MOSES
     -----------------
     MERRILL MOSES
     PRESIDENT AND CEO
     NOVEMBER 21, 2007
EXHIBIT 99.1

             PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
                     SAFE HARBOR COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
                      FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In passing the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Reform
Act"), 15 U.S.C.A. Sections 77z-2 and 78u-5 (Supp. 1996), Congress encouraged
public companies to make "forward-looking statements" by creating a safe
harbor to protect companies from securities law liability in connection with
forward-looking statements. NORTHBOROUGH HOLDINGS, INC. ("Northborough" or the
"Company") intends to qualify both its written and oral forward-looking
statements for protection under the Reform Act and any other similar safe
harbor provisions.

"Forward-looking statements" are defined by the Reform Act. Generally,
forward-looking statements include expressed expectations of future events and
the assumptions on which the expressed expectations are based. All
forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain as they are based on
various expectations and assumptions concerning future events and they are
subject to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could
cause actual events or results to differ materially from those projected. Due
to those uncertainties and risks, the investment community is urged not to
place undue reliance on written or oral forward-looking statements of
Northborough. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise this
Safe Harbor Compliance Statement for Forward-Looking Statements (the "Safe
Harbor Statement") to reflect future developments. In addition, Providence
Capital undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking
statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated
events or changes to future operating results over time.
### §43. Saint Marys River, Ohio and Indiana

Saint Marys River, Ohio and Indiana, is declared to be a nonnavigable stream within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

(Aug. 8, 1917, ch. 49, §17, 40 Stat. 268.)
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Caldwell County Railroad

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board 

concerning the status of Caldwell County Railroad Company (CCRC) as

an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et

sea.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C.

§351 et seg.) (RUIA).

Information about CCRC was provided in a letter dated January 5,

1995, from Ms. C. Nadine McGrady, Secretary/Treasurer for CCRC.

According to Ms. McGrady, CCRC is 22.7 miles long, running from

Hickory, North Carolina to Valmead, North Carolina, and began 

operations on September 24, 1994, as a "short line railroad

providing service to industries on the above said line",

interchanging with the Norfolk Southern. In Interstate Commerce

Commission (ICC) Finance Docket No. 32584, CCRC was granted an

exemption to lease, operate, and possibly acguire in the future

this rail line which is currently owned by the Norfolk Southern.

CCRC leases one locomotive from Thermal Belt Railway1. CCRC has

two employees, first compensated on September 26, 1994. These

employees are paid by Southeast Shortlines, Inc. d/b/a/ Thermal

Belt Railway, and CCRC then reimburses Thermal Belt Railway for the

appropriate percentage of hours worked on CCRC.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) (45 U.S.C.

§ 231(a)(1)), insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer

as:

(i) any express company, sleeping-car company, and

carrier by railroad, subject to subchapter I of chapter

105 of Title 49;

(ii) any company which is directly or indirectly 

owned or controlled by, or under common control with one

or more employers as defined in paragraph (i) of this 

subdivision and which operates any eguipment or facility 

or performs any service (other than trucking service,

casual service, and the casual operation of eguipment and

facilities) in connection with the transportation of

passengers or property by railroad * * *.

Section 1(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) (45

U.S.C. §§ 351(a) contains a substantially similar definition.

1 Southeast Shortlines, Inc. doing business as Thermal Belt Railway, is operated by Donald

J. and Carol N. McGrady, who operate CCRC.

BCD 1995-45 BA # 5556
Caldwell County Railroad Company

The evidence establishes that CCRC is a carrier by rail engaged in

the transportation of persons or property in interstate commerce.

Accordingly, it is determined that the Caldwell County Railroad

Company became a rail carrier under the Railroad Retirement and

Railroad Unemployment Insurance Acts effective September 24, 1994,

the date it began operations.

Glen L. Bower
### **CHAPTER 1001—ITALIAN AMERICAN WAR VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES**

Sec.
100101.
Definition.
100102.
Organization.
100103.
Purposes.
100104.
Membership.
100105.
Governing body.
100106.
Powers.
100107.
Restrictions.
100108.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
100109.
Records and inspection.
100110.
Service of process.
100111.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
100112.
Annual report.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Irving Savings Bank, Respondent, against Clyde Howes, as Assessor of the Village of Pelham Manor, et al., Appellants

Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
474 P.2d 76

#### Ira B. MILLER, Petitioner, v. Richard A. STANLEY, District Judge Third Judicial District, State of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 9007.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Sept. 10, 1970.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and TACK-ETT, WATSON, SISK and McKENNA, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition heretofore issued herein on February 9, 1970, be and the same is hereby quashed without prejudice for the reason that jurisdiction of the cause has been accepted by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cold Formed Parts and Machine Institute

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 16, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cold Formed Parts and 
Machine Institute (``CFPMI'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Cold Formed 
Parts and Machine Institute, Tarrytown, NY. The nature and scope of 
CFPMI's standards development activities are: development and 
maintenance of the American National Standard for Rivet Setting 
Machines. CFPMI is an ANSI accredited Standards Development 
Organization.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24570 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1920 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1920

 To require that contracts entered into by the Federal Government for 
 reconstruction in Iraq include a condition that the contractor, when 
 hiring employees to carry out the contract, provide a preference for 
                        the hiring of veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2003

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that contracts entered into by the Federal Government for 
 reconstruction in Iraq include a condition that the contractor, when 
 hiring employees to carry out the contract, provide a preference for 
                        the hiring of veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let U.S. Veterans Rebuild Iraq 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR VETERANS HIRING PREFERENCE FOR FEDERAL 
              CONTRACTORS PERFORMING CONTRACTS FOR RECONSTRUCTION IN 
              IRAQ.

    (a) Veterans Preference.--As a condition of any contract, or any 
subcontract at any tier under a contract, entered into by the Federal 
Government with a private sector contractor to perform reconstruction 
in Iraq, the Federal Government shall require the contractor (and any 
subcontractor at any tier hired by the contractor), when hiring 
employees who will perform work under the contract (or subcontract), to 
extend to preference eligible veterans a hiring preference equivalent 
to the preference extended to preference eligible veterans for civilian 
employee positions in the Federal Government.
    (b) Preference Eligible Veteran Defined.--In this section, the term 
``preference eligible veteran'' has the meaning given the term 
``preference eligible'' in section 2108 of title 5.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1Subsidiaries of the Company     Name Jurisdiction of IncorporationeFunds Corporation   CaliforniaAnalytic Research Technologies, Inc.   MinnesotaeFunds Canada, Inc.   CanadaClearCommerce Corporation   DelawareChex Systems, Inc.   MinnesotaeFunds Holdings Limited   United KingdomeFunds International Limited   United KingdomDeposit Payment Protection Services, Inc.   DelawareeFunds Global Holdings Corporation   MinnesotaiDLX International B.V.   NetherlandsiDLX Holdings B.V.   NetherlandseFunds IT Solutions Group, Inc.   DelawareeFunds International India Private Limited   IndiaeFunds Overseas, Inc.   MinnesotaATM Management Services, Inc.   MinnesotaeFunds (Canada) Corporation   Nova ScotiaPenley, Inc.   GeorgiaGlobal Recovery Services India Private Limited   IndiaWildCard Systems, Inc.   FloridaWCS Administrative Services, Inc.   FloridaWildCard Systems (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd.   SingaporeeFunds Corporation Payments Solutions and ServicesIndia Private Limited   India
#### Marie Mroz, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Sbeglia, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

BCD 2025-07

Connersville Northern Railroad, LLC (CNR)

B.A. No. 5353

December 6, 2024

This is a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning Connersville Northern 

Railroad, LLC’s (CNR) status as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) 

and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA) (collectively, the Acts). RRA, 45 

U.S.C. § 231 et seq.; RUIA, 45 U.S.C. §351 et seq. 

Mr. Brian Miller, President, Chief Executive Officer, and 100% Owner of CNR, provided 

information regarding CNR. On July 29, 2024, CNR began providing common carrier 

operations on approximately 5.2 miles of rail line that it purchased from RMW Ventures, 

LLC (RMW), extending from Milepost 0.0 in Connorsville, Indiana to Milepost 5.2+/- in 

Beeson, Indiana (the Line).

1 The Line has a point of interchange with CSX Transportation

Company (B.A. 1524) in Connorsville, Indiana. The first date of employee compensation 

was August 19, 2024.

In Surface Transportation Board (STB) Finance Docket No. 36793, CNR filed a verified 

notice of exemption to acquire and operate the Line as the exclusive common carrier 

service provider. Connersville Northern Railroad LLC—Acquisition and Change of 

Operator Exemption— RMW Ventures, LLC., 2024 STB Fin. Dkt. 36793. In its decision, 

effective July 26, 2024, the STB approved the consummation of the transaction between 

RIR and the County.

Under section 1(a)(1)(i) of the RRA, insofar as relevant here, a covered employer is defined 

as “any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board 

under Part A of subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code.” RRA § 1(a)(1)(i), 45 U.S.C. §

231(a)(l)(i). Section 1 of the RUIA and section 3231(a) of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act

(RRTA) contain substantially similar definitions. RUIA § 1, 45 U.S.C. § 351; RRTA, 26 

U.S.C. § 3231.

Here, the record establishes that CNR is a rail carrier operating in interstate commerce 

subject to the STB’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is determined that Connersville Northern 

Railroad, LLC became an employer within the meaning of the Acts effective on July 29, 

2024, the date it commenced operations. 

FOR THE BOARD

Stephanie Hillyard

Secretary to the Board

1 Prior to CNR’s acquisition of the Line, Big Four Terminal Railroad, LLC (BFTR) (B.A. 5431), a 

corporate affiliate of RMW, operated the Line and provided common carrier operations. The Board 

previously found that BFT was an employer under the Acts. See B.C.D. 15-12 (June 19, 2015).
Order entered May 16, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00744-CV

U.S. BANK, NA. SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF BEAR STEARNS ASSET 

BACKED SECURITIES I TRUST 2004-HW11, ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES 

SERIES 2004-HE11, BY AND THROUGH ITS SERVICER IN FACT, 

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., Appellant

V.

LUCILA M. SAAVEDRA AND JOSE MANUEL SAAVEDRA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-12077

ORDER

Before the Court is the parties’ May 10, 2019 joint notice of settlement and motion to 

stay briefing schedule. We GRANT the motion to the extent that we ORDER either appellees 

file their brief on the merits or the parties file a motion to dismiss by June 17, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

## **DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANY’SNON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS COMPENSATION POLICY**

 

The followingis a summary description of the material terms of the Company’s Non-EmployeeDirectors Compensation Policy (which was effective with the fiscal year beginningOctober 1, 2004):

 

•      TheCompany shall pay each non-employee director a retainer of $5,000 per quarter.

•      Eachnon-employee director will be paid $1,500 for each Board meeting scheduled tobe held in person and attended by such non-employee director.

•      Eachnon-employee director will be paid $750 for each committee meeting scheduled tobe held in person and attended by such non-employee director.

•      TheChairman of the Audit Committee will be paid a retainer of $2,500 per quarter.

•      TheChairman of the Compensation Committee will be paid a retainer of $1,250 perquarter.

•      Non-employeedirectors will not be compensated for attendance at Board or committee meetingsscheduled to be held telephonically.

•      Uponconclusion of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders each year, the Company willgrant each non-employee director immediately vested options to purchase 5,000shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Company’s 1994 Director Stock OptionPlan.

 

----
§ 831.1308 Referral to a collection agency. ( a ) OPM may refer certain debts to commercial collection agencies under the following conditions: ( 1 ) All processing required by § 831.1304 has been completed before the debt is released.
( 2 ) A contract for collection services has been negotiated.
( 3 ) OPM retains the responsibility for resolving disputes, compromising claims, referring the debt for litigation, or suspending or terminating collection action.
### §110107. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director, officer, or member during the life of the charter granted by this chapter. This subsection does not prevent the payment of reasonable compensation to an officer or reimbursement for actual necessary expenses in amounts approved by the board of directors.

(c) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, or employee.

(d) Claim of Governmental Approval or Authority.—The corporation may not claim congressional approval or the authority of the United States Government for any of its activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1368.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110107 | 36:2708. | Aug. 21, 1984, Pub. L. 98–391, §8, 98 Stat. 1359. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title. The words "This subsection does not prevent" are substituted for "Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
### §573. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 656

Section, act May 17, 1950, ch. 188, title I, §111, 64 Stat. 170, provided that section 607 of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, as amended [former 5 U.S.C. 947], should not be construed to prevent employment of additional personnel.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Neal Ludeke
-------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
American Credit Corp., Manager
of the Company
February 13, 2003