Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Notices 65445

applicants to show that identified needs 

are consistent with priorities of the State 

or county that has primary 

responsibility for the service delivery 

system. Therefore, Category 3 applicants 

do not have to include a copy of the 

State or County Strategic Plan as 

Appendix 5 of their application. 

1.2 In ‘‘Section C, Proposed 

Implementation Approach,’’ Category 3 

(Campus SBI) applicants must, in 

addition to the requirements specified 

in the SVC–05 PA, address the 

following requirements that are added 

as an additional bullet in the Evaluation 

Criteria section of the SVC–05 PA: 

Identify the geographic location of the 

proposed screening and brief 

intervention provider in relation to the 

targeted college/university campus. If 

the provider is located off campus, 

address how students will gain access to 

the service provider. Identify where 

subsequent services (i.e., treatment) will 

be provided. 

1.3 In ‘‘Section E, Evaluation and 

Data,’’ applicants must, in addition to 

the requirements specified in the SVC–

05 PA, address the following 

requirements that are added to the end 

of the 6th bullet in the Evaluation 

Criteria section of the SVC–05 PA: 

Applicants must state whether or not 

the per-person costs are within the 

following reasonable ranges by 

treatment modality. Applicants must 

also discuss the reasonableness of the 

per person costs. If proposed costs 

exceed reasonable ranges, a detailed 

justification must be provided. 

Program costs. The following are 

considered reasonable ranges by 

treatment modality: 

Residential: $3,000 to $10,000. 

Outpatient (Non-Methadone): $1,000 

to $5,000. 

Outpatient (Methadone): $1,500 to 

$8,000. 

Intensive Outpatient: $1,000 to 

$7,500. 

Screen/Brief Intervention/Brief 

Treatment/Outreach/Pretreatment

Services: $200 to $1,200. 

Drug Court Programs (regardless of 

client treatment modality): $3,000 to 

$5,000. 

SAMHSA/CSAT computes per person 

costs as follows. The total support 

requested for the life of the project is 

multiplied by .8 (.2 will be the 

allowance for GPRA reporting 

requirements). The resulting amount is 

then divided by the number of persons 

the applicant proposes to serve over the 

life of the project. 

The outreach and pretreatment 

services cost band only applies to 

outreach and pretreatment programs 

that do not also offer treatment services 

but operate within a network of 

substance abuse treatment facilities. 

Treatment programs that add outreach 

and pretreatment services to a treatment 

modality or modalities are expected to 

fall within the cost band for that 

treatment modality. 

1.4 Performance Measurement: All 

SAMHSA grantees are required to 

collect and report certain data, so that 

SAMHSA can meet its obligations under 

the Government Performance and 

Results Act (GPRA). Grantees of the 

Targeted Capacity Expansion Grants 

program will be required to report 

performance in several areas. 

Applicants must document their ability 

to collect and report the required data 

in ‘‘Section E: Evaluation and Data’’ of 

their applications. 

All Targeted Capacity Expansion 

grant applicants must document their 

ability to collect and report data using 

the Targeted Capacity Expansion Client 

Level GPRA tool that can be found at 

http://www.csat-gpra.samhsa.gov (click 

on ‘‘Data Collection Tools/

Instruments’’), along with instructions 

for completing it. Hard copies are 

available in the application kits 

distributed by SAMHSA’s National 

Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug 

Information (NCADI). GPRA data must 

be collected at baseline (i.e., the client’s 

entry into the project), 6 months after 

the baseline, and 12 months after the 

baseline. Projects serving adolescents 

also must collect 3 month post-baseline 

data to capture the nuances of change 

particular to this population. GPRA data 

must be entered into the GPRA Web 

system within 7 business days of the 

forms being completed. In addition, 

80% of the participants must be 

followed up on. GPRA data are to be 

collected and then entered into CSAT’s 

GPRA Data Entry and Reporting System 

(http://www.csat-gpra.samhsa.gov). 

Training and technical assistance on 

data collecting, tracking, and follow-up, 

as well as data entry, will be provided 

by CSAT. 

2. Review and Selection Process:

Information about the review and 

selection process is available in the 

SVC–05 PA in Section V–2. 

VI. Award Administration Information 

Award administration information, 

including information about award 

notices, administration requirements 

and reporting requirements, is included 

in the SVC–05 PA in Section VI. 

SAMHSA’s standard terms and 

conditions are available at http://

www.samhsa.gov/grants/generalinfo/

useful_info.aspx.

You must plan to send a minimum of 

three persons (Authorized Grantee, 

Project Director if different, Evaluator) 

to at least two joint grantee meetings 

each year instead of the requirement for 

two persons to one joint grantee meeting 

each year as stated in the SVC–05 PA 

and should budget accordingly. 

TCE grantees are required to provide 

progress reports every six months 

instead of annual progress reports 

required by the SVC–05 PA. The last 

report will be a final, cumulative report. 

VII. Contacts for Additional 

Information 

For questions about program issues, 

contact: Ken Robertson, SAMHSA/

CSAT, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 5–

1001, Rockville, MD 20857; (240) 276–

1621; E-mail: 

kenneth.robertson@samhsa.hhs.gov.

For questions on grants management 

issues, contact: Kimberly Pendleton, 

SAMHSA, Division of Grants 

Management, 1 Choke Cherry Road, 

Room 7–1097, Rockville, MD 20857; 

(240) 276–1421; E-mail: 

kimberly.pendleton@samhsa.hhs.gov.

Dated: November 5, 2004. 

Daryl Kade, 

Director, Office of Policy, Planning and 

Budget, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration.

[FR Doc. 04–25188 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Bureau of Customs and Border 

Protection 

[CBP Decision 04–37] 

CBP Decision; Recordation of Trade 

Name: ‘‘Joy Enterprises’’

ACTION: Notice of application for 

recordation of trade name. 

SUMMARY: Application has been filed 

pursuant to section 133.12, Customs 

Regulations (19 CFR 133.12), for the 

recordation under section 42 of the Act 

of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 U.S.C. 

1124), of the trade name ‘‘Joy 

Enterprises’’. The trade name is owned 

by Shell Stores Corporation d/b/a Joy 

Enterprises, a Florida corporation. 

The application states that the trade 

name ‘‘Joy Enterprises’’ is used in 

connection with knives, outdoor and 

sport supplies, police and security 

equipment, gift and premium items, 

swords, daggers, scissors, multitools and 

key chains, which are manufactured in 

China, Taiwan, Japan, Spain, USA, Italy 

and Germany. 

Applicant states that the trade name 

‘‘Joy Enterprises’’ is customarily used 

65446 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2004 / Notices 

apart from the complete business name 

Shell Stores Corporation. The applicant 

states that there are no foreign persons 

or business entities authorized or 

licensed to use the trade name. 

Before final action is taken on the 

application, consideration will be given 

to any relevant data, views, or 

arguments, submitted in writing, by any 

person in opposition to the recordation 

of this trade name. Notice of the action 

taken on the application for recordation 

of this trade name will be published in 

the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 11, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection, Attention: Office of 

Regulations and Rulings, Intellectual 

Property Rights Branch, 1300 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., (Mint 

Annex), Washington, DC 20229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: La 

Verne Watkins, Paralegal, Intellectual 

Property Rights Branch at (202) 572–

8702.

Dated: November 1, 2004, 

George Frederick McCray, 

Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch.

[FR Doc. 04–24645 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4820–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–4909–N–10] 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection for Public Comment on 

How’s HUD Doing in 2005? A HUD 

Partners Survey

AGENCY: Office of Policy Development 

and Research, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The proposed information 

collection requirement described below 

will be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The Department is 

soliciting public comments on the 

subject proposal.

DATES: Comments Due Date: January 11, 

2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name and should be 

sent to: Reports Liaison Officer, Office 

of Policy Development and Research, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street, SW., 

Room 8226, Washington, DC 20410.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cheryl A. Levine, Department of 

Housing and Urban Development, Office 

of Policy Development and Research, 

451 7th Street, SW., Room 8140, 

Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 

708–3700, extension 3928 (this is not a 

toll-free number). Copies of the 

proposed data collection instruments 

and other available documents may be 

obtained from Ms. Levine.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department will submit the proposed 

information collection to OMB for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35, as amended). This Notice is 

soliciting comments from members of 

the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information to: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (3) Enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) Minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology 

(e.g., permitting electronic submission 

of responses). 

This Notice also lists the following 

information: 

Title of Proposal: How’s HUD Doing 

in 2005? A HUD Partners Survey. 

Description of the need for the 

information and proposed use: HUD’s 

Annual Performance Plan requires the 

Department to measure the satisfaction 

level of its partners. A baseline 

satisfaction survey was conducted and 

published in 2001. This proposed effort, 

a follow-up to the 2001 study, is a 

survey of the people and organizations 

HUD works with to implement its 

programs, in particular: local 

governments, housing agencies, 

community development departments, 

fair housing agencies, multi-family 

housing entities, and nonprofit housing 

organizations. 

Members of affected public: Members 

of the following groups will be 

surveyed: local elected officials, city 

and county community development 

department directors, public housing 

authority directors, owners of HUDassisted multifamily housing properties, 

directors of nonprofit organizations, and 

fair housing agency directors. 

Estimation of the total numbers of 

hours needed to prepare the information 

collection including number of 

respondents, frequency of response, and 

hours of response: Approximately 2,500 

partners will be surveyed on a one-time 

basis. Consistent with the baseline 

study, each survey is expected to take 

19 minutes. Total burden hours are 792. 

Status of the proposed information 

collection: Pending OMB approval.

Authority: Section 3506 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 

as amended.

Dated: November 4, 2004. 

Dennis C. Shea, 

Assistant Secretary for Policy, Development 

and Research.

[FR Doc. 04–25157 Filed 11–10–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–62–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–4907–N–33] 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection: Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 

Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The proposed information 

collection requirement described below 

will be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The Department is 

soliciting public comments on the 

subject proposal.

DATES: Comments Due Date: January 11, 

2005.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name and/or OMB 

Control Number and should be sent to: 

Wayne Eddins, Reports Management 

Officer, Department of Housing and 

Urban Development, 451 7th Street, 

SW., L’Enfant Plaza Building, Room 

8001, Washington, DC 20410 or 

Wayne_Eddins@hud.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael McCullough, Director, Office of 

Multifamily Development, Department 

of Housing and Urban Development, 

451 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 

20410, telephone (202) 708–1142, (this 

is not a toll free number), for copies of 

the proposed forms and other available 

information.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department is submitting the proposed 

information collection to OMB for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35, as amended).