alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24775]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4871]


Notice of Meetings; United States International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee, International Telecommunication Union 
Telecommunications Development Advisory Group Preparations

    The Department of State announces meetings of the U.S. 
International Telecommunication Advisory Committee. The purpose of the 
Committee is to advise the Department on policy and technical issues 
with respect to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The 
purpose of these meetings is to prepare for the December 2004 meeting 
of the Telecommunications Development Advisory Group (TDAG).
    An ITAC meeting will be held on Friday, November 19, 2004, at the 
State Department from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. to begin preparations for the 
meeting of the ITU Telecommunications Development Advisory Group, which 
will take place December 15-17, 2004, in Geneva, Switzerland. An 
additional meeting is scheduled concerning preparations for the TDAG on 
Wednesday, December 8, 2004, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. All of these 
meetings will be at the Department of State in Room 2533A.
    Members of the public may attend these meetings and are welcome to 
participate in the discussions, subject to the discretion of the Chair. 
Directions to meeting location may be determined by calling the ITAC 
Secretariat at 202 647-2592. Entrance to the State Department is 
controlled; in order to get precleared for each meeting, people 
planning to attend should send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#167b757579647d7a73787256656277627338717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa979999958891969f949eba898e9b8e9fd49d958c">[email protected]</span></a> no 
later than 48 hours before the meeting. This e-mail should include the 
name of the meeting and date of meeting, your name, social security 
number, date of birth, and organizational affiliation. One of the 
following valid photo identifications will be required for admission to 
the State Department: U.S. driver's license, passport, U. S. Government 
identification card. Enter the Department of State from the C Street 
Lobby; in view of escorting requirements, non-Government attendees 
should plan to arrive not less than 15 minutes before the meeting 
begins.

    Dated: November 1, 2004.
Doreen McGirr,
Director, ITU-D, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 04-24775 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Steel Corporation

– Keetac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012

**Item 1**

Provide process flow diagrams for both the taconite iron ore mining and the taconite pellet manufacturing processes. Include in the description, at a minimum, information on the following: mining operations, ore transfer and storage, course ore

crus hing, fine ore crushing, ore classification screens, ore storage bins, grinding rod/ball mills, separation, thickeners, balling drums/pellet formation, indurating furnace, pellet cooling and storage, and the process boilers. I nclude a detailed narrative pr ocess description and photographs to explain the indurating furnace process (separatel y for each furnace). For each photograph, provide a coded diagram/map to clearly

identify the location of the image in the photograph. Photographs must correspond to each of the process stages described.
**Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Teresa Simetkosky , Kraig Raiber, Stephani Campbell

**Answer:**

As per the conversa tion during the meeting and tour on April 18, 2012, the tour and the pictures taken and provided reduced the scope of this item. As a result and as agreed upon, USS has provided flowsheets outlining the process flow and an air flow diagram of the indurati ng line at Keetac. As noted in the submittal letter to this response, U. S. Steel respectfully requests that the photographs taken during the tour be treated as Confidential Business Information. U. S. Steel takes reasonable measures to protect the confi dentiality of such pictures and continues to do so, and an y such photographs of equipment and processes are propietary in nature and such photographs are not and have not been reasonabl y obtainable b y legitimate means without U. S. Steel’s consent.
#### Forest J. Tidabock, Respondent, v. United States Gypsum Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the jury rendered a verdict of $11,000 in plaintiff’s favor and against defendants. Defendants appeal from the judgment entered thereon and from “ determina*1066tion” denying their motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless respondent stipulate, within ten days after the entry of an order hereon, to reduce the verdict to $7,500, in which event, the judgment, as thus reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive. Appeal from “determination” dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and STD 
Prevention and Treatment (CHACHSPT); Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 
October 6, 1972, that the CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV, Viral 
Hepatitis and STD Prevention and Treatment (CHACHSPT), Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human 
Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through November 25, 
2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Mermin, M.D., M.P.H., 
Designated Federal Officer, CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV, Viral 
Hepatitis and STD Prevention and Treatment (CHACHSPT), CDC, HHS, 1600 
Clifton Road, NE, Mailstop E07, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4027, Telephone 
404-639-8000, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfd5d7d288ffdcdbdc91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cf6f4f1abdcfff8ffb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Sherri Berger,
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-27717 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
August 14, 2013

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Exemption Authority of US Airways, Inc.

(Washington, DC – Mexico City, Mexico) 

(Dated August 22, 2011) (Docket DOT-OST-2003-15310)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

On August 22, 2011, the Department of Transportation (“Department”) issued US 

Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”) exemption authority to provide scheduled foreign air 

transportation of persons, property and mail between Washington, D.C. and Mexico 

City, Mexico. (See Notice of Action Taken, August 22, 2011, Docket DOT-OST-2003-

15310 (“Notice”).) The Notice stated that US Airways would provide this service 

pursuant to a codeshare arrangement with United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”); and granted 

US Airways exemption authority through August 22, 2013.

In accordance with the Conditions set forth in the Notice, US Airways hereby 

advises the Department that no longer provides Washington, DC – Mexico City service

via a codeshare with United, and does not intend to renew this exemption authority. 

Accordingly, US Airways respectfully provides notice of dormancy with respect to the 

Washington, DC – Mexico City route. 

Respectfully submitted,

Howard Kass

Vice President, Legal and Government Affairs

Benjamin T. Slocum

Director, Legal and Government Affairs

Attachment

cc: Service List
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on August 14, 2013, I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing 

Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

urskr@state.gov (Department of State)

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

vanessa.balgobin@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

karine.faden@united.com (United)

francis.heil@aa.com (American)

robert.wirick@aa.com (American)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue)

msinick@ssd.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

ethan.blank@rjet.com (Republic)

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

cefelts@fedex.com (FedEx)

nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar)

_________________________

Benjamin T. Slocum
Source Name Source Type

 Pioneer Valley, MA New NGCC

Woodbridge Energy, NJ (CPV Vally) New NGCC

Newark Energy Center, NJ New NGCC

CPV Valley, NY New NGCC

Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc. - 

Sumpter Power Plant in Belleville, MI

Modify an existing CT into a combined-cycle 

CT by adding a non-fired HRSG

LCRA, TX New NGCC

Pacificorp Lakeside Phase II, UT New NGCC

FPL - Port Everglades New NGCC

Palmdale Hybrid Power Plant New NGCC with Solar

Cricket Valley Energy, NY New NGCC

Garrison Energy, DE New NGCC
GHG BACT Limits

895 lbs of CO2e/MWh on a 365-day rolling average

925 lbs/MWh CO2

879 lbs/MWh CO2

925 lbs/MWh CO2

954 CO2e per lb/MWh gross energy output on a 12-month rolling avg.

0.459 Ton CO2e/MWh (net) 12 month rolling average (918 lb/MWh)

950 lb CO2e per MWh (gross), 12-month rolling average

Applicant proposed: 877 lb CO2e/MWh (either fuel)

774 lb CO2/MWh net output and 7319 Btu/kWh (365-day rolling)

Thermal efficiency of 57.4% and heat rate < 7605 Btu/kW-hr

7,717 btu/kwh; 1,006,304 tpy CO2e
### SUBCHAPTER I—PRELIMINARY
#### § 1653.23 Processing and payment.

To the maximum extent consistent with sections 8437(e)(3) and 8467(a)(2), child abuse court orders will be processed by the TSP record keeper under the procedures described in subparts A and B of this part.

[FR 35510, June 13, 2003, as amended at 87 FR 31691, May 24, 2022]
#### Leon Bohn, Appellant, *v.*434 East 59th Street, Inc., Respondent.

First Department,

November 10, 1953.

*Ludwig M. Wilson*of counsel *(Samuel Balk*on the brief; *Samuel R. Kurzman,*attorney), for respondent.

*Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr.,*of counsel *(Fink, McNamee & Pavia,*attorneys), for appellant.

*574
      *Beatrice Shainswit*of counsel *(Robert H. Schaffer,*attorney), for State Rent Commission, *amicus curiæ.*

*Per Curiam.*

The appellant sued to recover rental overcharges of $475 with treble damages. The jury returned a verdict for single damages and upon appeal the Appellate Term reversed the judgment and dismissed the complaint.

The appellant occupied an apartment on the premises of the respondent from September 15,1950, to September 30, 1951, pursuant to a written lease which provided that the apartment was to be occupied as “ living quarters and executive offices ”. The stipulated rent was $110 per month. Some five months previous to September, 1950, a commercial rent of $125 a month had been fixed pursuant to a commercial arbitration with a prior tenant and confirmed by an order of the Supreme Court. The registered maximum residential rent was $62.50 a month.

The trial court submitted to the jury the factual issue of whether the apartment was in fact intended and actually used for residential or commercial purposes. The respondent took no exceptions to the charge and submitted no requests. Implicit in the verdict of the jury was a finding that the intended and actual use of the apartment was for residential purposes.

The fixing of a commercial rent pursuant to law does not deprive a subsequent residential tenant of the protection of the residential rent control and the maximum rent established' thereby. (Cf. *Powell*v. *Park Lex. Realty Corp.,*280 App. Div. 136, affd. 304 N. Y. 960.)

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and the judgment of the Municipal Court reinstated, with costs to appellant and an allowance to the appellant of an additional counsel fee in the sum of $125.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ., concur.

Determination unanimously reversed in accordance with the opinion herein. Settle order on notice.
### §10308. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this part such sums as may be necessary.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1218, as added Pub. L. 104–238, §2(2), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796d–7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 8301.106 Additional rules for employees of the Office of Inspector General. Any employee of the Office of Inspector General, not otherwise required to obtain approval for outside employment under § 8301.102, shall obtain written approval, in accordance with the procedures and standards set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) of § 8301.102, before engaging in any form of outside employment that involves the following: ( a ) Law enforcement, investigation, security, firearms training, defensive tactics training, and protective services;
( b ) Auditing, accounting, bookkeeping, tax preparation, and other services involving the analysis, use, or interpretation of financial records;
( c ) The practice of law, whether compensated or not; or
( d ) Employment involving personnel, procurement, budget, computer, or equal employment opportunity services.
# USGS Publications Warehouse

The Pubs Warehouse provides access to over 170,000 publications written by USGS scientists over the            century-plus history of the bureau.

**

### New                        Publications by USGS Authors

Groundwater quality near the Placerita Oil Field, California, 2018

Pesticides in surface water downstream of and near agricultural and developed land in Hawai‘i, 2015–19

Projected sea-level rise and high tide flooding at San Juan National Historic Site, Puerto Rico

Dissolved oxygen monitoring on the Souris River, 2019–23

Evaluation and review of ecology-focused stream studies to support cooperative monitoring, Fountain Creek Basin, Colorado

ECCOE Landsat quarterly Calibration and Validation report—Quarter 1, 2024
### §520. Review of findings and orders

Any order made or issued under section 516 of this title may be reviewed by the court of appeals for any judicial circuit in which the bridge in question is wholly or partly located, if a petition for such review is filed within three months after the date such order is issued. The judgment of any such court shall be final except that it shall be subject to review by the Supreme Court of the United States upon certification or certiorari, in the manner provided in section 1254 of title 28. The review by such Court shall be limited to questions of law, and the findings of fact by the Secretary, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive. Upon such review, such Court shall have power to affirm or, if the order is not in accordance with law, to modify or to reverse the order, with or without remanding the case for a rehearing as justice may require. Proceedings under this section shall not operate as a stay of any order of the Secretary issued under provisions of this subchapter other than section 516 of this title, or relieve any bridge owner of any liability or penalty under such provisions.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §10, 54 Stat. 501; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Section 1254 of title 28" substituted in text for "sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, section 1 of which enacted Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Prior to the enactment of Title 28, sections 239 and 240 of the Judicial Code were classified to sections 346 and 347 of Title 28.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, as amended by act May 24, 1949, substituted "court of appeals" for "circuit court of appeals".
§ 2428.3 Authority decision. ( a ) A decision and order of the Assistant Secretary shall be enforced unless it is arbitrary and capricious or based upon manifest disregard of the law.
( b ) The Authority shall issue its decision on the case enforcing, enforcing as modified, refusing to enforce, or remanding the decision and order of the Assistant Secretary.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0130 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2014-CE-005-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
### §41504. Project Safe Neighborhoods

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall establish a program for each United States Attorney to provide for coordination with State and local law enforcement officials in the identification and prosecution of violations of Federal firearms laws including school gun violence and juvenile gun offenses.

#### (b) Authorization for hiring 94 additional Assistant United States Attorneys

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $9,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 to hire an additional Assistant United States Attorney in each United States Attorney Office.

(Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title I, §104, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1766.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified as a note under section 509 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 550.406 Work assignments during evacuation; return to duty. ( a ) Evacuated employees at safe havens may be assigned to perform any work considered necessary or required to be performed during the period of the evacuation without regard to the grades or titles of the employees. Failure or refusal to perform assigned work may be a basis for terminating further evacuation payments.
( b ) When part-time employees are given assigned work at the safe haven, records of the number of hours worked shall be maintained so that payment may be made for any hours of work that are greater than the number of hours on which evacuation payments are computed.
( c ) Not later than 180 days after the effective date of the order to evacuate, or when the emergency or evacuation situation is terminated, whichever is earlier, an employee must be returned to his or her regular duty station, or appropriate action must be taken to reassign him or her to another duty station.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

July 21 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00676

- CV

IN RE ANDREA SIMON, AMBER CROOK, AMANDA BUSBEE, WALTER

SIMON, AND JAMES CAM BPELL , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 127th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 01361



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

R elator s Andrea Simon, Amber Crook, Amanda Busbee, Walter Simon, and James Cambpell filed a petition for writ of m andamus and emergency motion for

t emporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this Court to compel the Honorable Ravi
K. Sandill, presiding judge of the 127th District Court of Harris County

, to vacate

the t rial court ’ s November 19, 2021 order allowing Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to2

interplead Albert Benjamin Simon’s estate funds into the registry of the district

court.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, our November 23, 2021 stay is lifted.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.