alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 07-134 October 15, 2007

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTORS 

AVAILABLE ON NRC WEBSITE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today made available the public version of a 

combined license (COL) application for two new reactors at the South Texas Project site near 

Bay City, Texas. 

The applicants, NRG Energy and South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company, 

submitted the application and associated information Sept. 24. The application, minus 

proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC Web site here: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col.html . 

NRG’s COL application seeks approval to build and operate two Advanced Boiling 

Water Reactors (ABWR) at the site, approximately 12 miles southwest of Bay City. The ABWR 

is a 1,300 MWe design the NRC certified in 1997, and is currently in use overseas. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial check of the application to determine 

whether it contains sufficient information required for a formal review. If the application passes 

the initial check, the NRC will “docket,” or accept it for review; this decision is expected in 

December. If the application is accepted, the NRC will then notice an opportunity for the public 

to request an adjudicatory hearing on the application. 

 ### 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 1, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ ANAND NALLATHAMBI  
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### Charles H. Hurlbut et al., appellees, v. Lester Proctor, appellant.

Filed February 15, 1911.

No. 16,278.

1. Appeal: Denial of Amendment. The denial of leave to amend a pleading during the trial is not reversible error, if the record fails to disclose that the trial court in so ruling abused its discretion.

2.-: Failure to Except. Failure to mark an Instruction "given” is not available as error in absence of .an exception on that ground.

*492Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*George A. Adams*and *W. W. Towle,*for appellant.

*Burr & Ma/rlay, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is an action for breach of warranty in the sale of a crib of corn purchased by plaintiffs from defendant. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $100, defendant has appealed.

The petition alleges and the answer admits that the corn was purchased February 8, 1907. During the trial the court refused to allow defendant to amend his answer by alleging the sale was made at an earlier date, and the ruling is assigned as error. It is familiar law that the denying of leave to amend a pleading during the trial is not reversible error, if the record fails to disclose that the trial court in so ruling abused its discretion. *Hubenka v. Vach,*64 Neb. 170. No abuse of discretion is shown. The case had previously been tried before a justice of the peace, and there is nothing to indicate a change in the testimony or in anything else requiring an amendment of the answer in the particular stated.

It is suggested by defendant that an instruction appearing in the record was not marked “given,” as required by statute. The transcript, however, shows it was in fact given. There was no exception to the instruction on that ground, and the omission therefore is not available as error. *City of Chadron v. Glover,*43 Neb. 732.

An instruction referring to the witnesses and directing the jury to consider “their apparent fairness or bias, if any such appears,” and “their apparent fairness or bias, if any such is proved,” is criticised as erroneous. It is argued that the words “appear” and “proved” differ in meaning, and that it is not sufficient under the charge to *493show that bias of a witness “appears,” but that it must be “proved.” There is no substantial ground for this criticism.

The assignments fail to disclose a reversible error and the judgment is

Affirmed.
No. 07-116 September 7, 2007

LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR BEAVER VALLEY NUCLEAR PLANTAVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-year renewalof the operating licenses for the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant, Units 1 and 2, is available forpublic review.

Beaver Valley Units 1 and 2 are pressurized water reactors located about 17 miles west ofMcCandless, Pa. The current operating licenses expire Jan. 29, 2016, for Unit 1 and May 27, 2027, forUnit 2.

Beaver Valley’s operator, First Energy Nuclear Operating Co. (FENOC), submitted the licenserenewal application Aug. 27. The application is available on the NRC Web site at this address:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html . The application is alsoavailable at the Beaver Area Memorial Library, 100 College Ave., Beaver, Pa. 

FENOC originally submitted a license renewal application for Beaver Valley in March 2005.The NRC returned that application as incomplete and unacceptable for docketing.

The NRC staff is currently conducting its initial reviews of the new application to determinewhether it contains sufficient information required for the formal safety and environmental reviews. Ifthe application has sufficient information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file it and will announcean opportunity for the public to request an adjudicatory hearing on the renewal request. Additionalinformation about the NRC’s review of reactor license renewal applications is available on the NRCWeb site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

###

News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.

NRC NEWS  U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION   

Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00034-CR

ALLEN LATOI STORY,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-2499-C1

S E C O N D A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

On February 26, 2020, this Court issued an abatement order, abating this cause to 

the trial court for the parties to create a record that is capable of being reviewed. The trial 

court was ordered to hold a hearing to receive certain evidence within 35 days of the date 

of the abatement order. The trial court clerk was ordered to include in the clerk’s record,

due May 5, 2020, any additional documents designated by the parties for the appellate 
Story v. State Page 2

record and any additional orders or findings of the trial court. The court reporter was

ordered to file a reporter’s record of the hearing with the additional evidence, if any, by 

May 5, 2020.

The trial court requests an extension of the deadlines in the February 26, 2020

abatement order until 30 days after the expiration of Governor Greg Abbott’s recent 

emergency declaration. We reinstate this appeal to rule on the trial court’s request. We 

grant the request. 

Accordingly, we again abate this cause to the trial court for the parties to create a 

record that is capable of being reviewed, pursuant to this Court’s February 26, 2020 

abatement order. However, the deadlines in the February 26, 2020 abatement order are 

extended as follows.

 The trial court is ORDERED to hold the hearing by June 15, 2020. The trial court 

clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing any additional 

documents designated by the parties for the appellate record and any additional orders 

or findings of the trial court by July 15, 2020. The court reporter is ORDERED to file a 

reporter’s record of the hearing with the additional evidence, if any, by July 15, 2020.

The appellant’s brief will then be due 30 days after this Court has received both 

the clerk’s record and reporter’s record and has reinstated this appeal.

PER CURIAM
Story v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed April 17, 2020

RWR