alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12211. Definitions

As used in this part:

#### (1) Community development corporation

The term "community development corporation" means a private, nonprofit corporation whose board of directors is comprised of business, civic and community leaders, and whose principal purpose includes the provision of low-income housing or community economic development projects that primarily benefit low-income individuals and communities.

#### (2) Local and private sector contribution

The term "local and private sector contribution" means the funds available at the local level (by private financial institutions, State and local governments) or by any private philanthropic organization and private, nonprofit organizations that will be committed and used solely for the purpose of financing private business enterprises in conjunction with amounts provided under this part.

#### (3) Population-losing community

The term "population-losing community" means any county in which the net population loss is at least 7 percent from April 1, 1980 to April 1, 1990, as reported by the Bureau of the Census.

#### (4) Private business enterprise

The term "private business enterprise" means any business enterprise that is engaged in the manufacture of a product, provision of a service, construction or development of a facility, or that is involved in some other commercial, manufacturing or industrial activity, and that agrees to target job opportunities stemming from investments authorized under this part to certain individuals.

#### (5) Target area

The term "target area" means any area defined in an application for assistance under this part that has a population whose income does not exceed the median for the area within which the target area is located.

#### (6) Very low-income community

The term "very low-income community" means a community in which the median income of the residents of such community does not exceed 50 percent of the median income of the area.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31131, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1887.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13851 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

As independent auditors of Ambient Corporation ("the Company"), we hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated March 1, 2001, on
the Company's consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2000 in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed in October 1998 and in the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 which the Company anticipates
filing after the date hereof.


/S/ Brightman Almagor & Co.

Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Tel-Aviv, Israel
June 12, 2001
§ 531.215 Setting pay upon demotion. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise provided in this section, an employee who is demoted is entitled to the minimum payable rate of basic pay for the lower grade unless the agency sets the employee's pay at a higher rate under— ( 1 ) The grade and pay retention rules in 5 CFR part 536, as applicable; or
( 2 ) The maximum payable rate rule in § 531.221, as applicable.
( b ) *Geographic conversion.* If the employee's official worksite after demotion is in a different geographic location where different pay schedules apply, the agency must first convert the employee's payable rate of pay as required by § 531.205 before setting the demoted employee's pay using the grade and pay retention rules in 5 CFR part 536 or the maximum payable rate rule in § 531.221.
( c ) *Expiration or termination of a temporary promotion.* ( 1 ) When an employee is returned to the lower grade from which promoted on expiration or termination of a temporary promotion, the agency must set the employee's payable rate of basic pay in the lower grade as if he or she had not been temporarily promoted, unless the agency sets pay at a higher rate under the maximum payable rate rule in § 531.221. As provided in subpart D of this part, time during the temporary promotion may be creditable service towards GS within-grade increases in the lower grade.
( 2 ) If a temporary promotion is made permanent immediately after the temporary promotion ends, the agency may not return the employee to the lower grade. (See § 531.214(e).)
( d ) *Demotion upon failure to complete a supervisory probationary period.* When an employee promoted to a supervisory or managerial position does not satisfactorily complete a probationary period established under 5 U.S.C. 3321(a)(2) and is returned to a position at the lower grade held before the promotion, the agency must set the employee's payable rate of basic pay upon return to the lower grade as if the employee had not been promoted to the supervisory or managerial position, unless the agency sets pay at a higher rate under the maximum payable rate rule in § 531.221. As provided in subpart D of this part, time served following the promotion may be creditable service towards GS within-grade increases in the lower grade. However, nothing in this paragraph prohibits an agency from taking action against an employee serving under a probationary period under 5 U.S.C. 3321(a)(2) for cause unrelated to supervisory or managerial performance and setting pay in accordance with such action.
( e ) *Correcting an erroneous demotion.* When a demotion is determined to be erroneous and is canceled, the agency must set the employee's rate of basic pay as if the employee had not been demoted. The action is a correction of the original demotion action and may not be treated as a promotion under § 531.214. For example, when a demotion based on a reclassification of the employee's position is found to be erroneous and is corrected retroactively under 5 CFR 511.703, the corrective action is cancellation of the original demotion.
[70 FR 31291, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 66152, Nov. 7, 2008]
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-003 January 19, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO MEET WITH NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT TO DISCUSS

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT ACTIONS AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Nebraska Public

Power District on Tuesday, January 25, to discuss the status of actions set out in a Confirmatory

Action Letter (CAL) issued on January 30, 2003, to the Cooper Nuclear Station.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at

Brownville Concert Hall, Atlantic Avenue and Second Street, Brownville, Neb. Before the

session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public about the

safety performance of the plant and the role of the NRC in ensuring its safe operation.

Cooper has been subject to increased NRC oversight since April 2002. The CAL

describes steps Nebraska Public Power District officials committed to take to improve plant

performance, which have been subject to NRC inspection. In a Sept. 2, 2004, letter to the NRC,

Nebraska Public Power District officials informed the NRC that they had completed all of the steps

outlined in the CAL. 

“The NRC has been independently verifying that Nebraska Public Power District has

completed all of the actions described in the CAL to improve plant performance,” NRC Region

IV administrator Bruce S. Mallet said. “At the meeting, we plan to discuss with the licensee

whether we can close the CAL as an oversight tool and the steps they will take to ensure

improved performance for the long term.”

The CAL can be found in the agency’s electronic document system (ADAMS) which can

be accessed through the NRC’s web site at www.nrc.gov . Help in using ADAMS is available by

contacting the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209.

###
§ 531.223 Rates of basic pay that may not be used as the highest previous rate. The highest previous rate may not be based on the following: ( a ) A rate received under an appointment as an expert or consultant under 5 U.S.C. 3109;
( b ) A rate received in a position to which the employee was temporarily promoted for less than 1 year, except upon permanent placement in a position at the same or higher grade;
( c ) A rate received in a position from which the employee was reassigned or reduced in grade for failure to satisfactorily complete a probationary period as a supervisor or manager;
( d ) A rate received by an individual while employed by the government of the District of Columbia who was first employed by that government on or after October 1, 1987;
( e ) A rate received by an individual while employed by a Department of Defense or Coast Guard nonappropriated fund instrumentality;
( f ) A rate received solely during a period of interim relief under 5 U.S.C. 7701(b)(2)(A);
( g ) A special rate established under 5 U.S.C. 5305 and 5 CFR part 530, subpart C, or 38 U.S.C. 7455 (except as provided in § 531.222(c));
( h ) A rate received under a void appointment or a rate otherwise contrary to applicable law or regulation;
( i ) A rate received as a member of the uniformed services; or
( j ) A retained rate under 5 U.S.C. 5363 or a similar rate under another legal authority.
[70 FR 31291, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 66153, Nov. 7, 2008]
# L_2015311EN.01002701.xml

| 26.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 274/2014

of 12 December 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2015/2141]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2014/289/EU of 15 May 2014 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the active substances pinoxaden and meptyldinocap (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2014/289/EU of 15 May 2014 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the active substances pinoxaden and meptyldinocap (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 13zzzzk (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 922/2014) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘13zzzzl. | 32014 D 0289: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/289/EU of 15 May 2014 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the active substances pinoxaden and meptyldinocap (OJ L 147, 17.5.2014, p. 114).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘13zzzzl.

32014 D 0289: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/289/EU of 15 May 2014 allowing Member States to extend provisional authorisations granted for the active substances pinoxaden and meptyldinocap (OJ L 147, 17.5.2014, p. 114).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2014/289/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 13 December 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 203/2014 of 30 September 2014 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 147, 17.5.2014, p. 114.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 202, 30.7.2015, p. 57.

2

---
#### § 2429.2 Transfer and consolidation of cases.

In any matter arising pursuant to parts 2422 and 2423 of this subchapter, whenever it appears necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute or to avoid unnecessary costs or delay, Regional Directors may consolidate cases within their own region or may transfer such cases to any other region, for the purpose of investigation or consolidation with any proceedings which may have been instituted in, or transferred to, such region.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 20, 2022

No. 04-22-00355-CV

SSC WIMBERLEY OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, Randall Morris, Bozena Mrozek, 

Calvin Boutte, SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC, and SSC Equity Holdings 

MT, LLC,

Appellants

v.

Shellie GOODMAN,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI17165

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 30, 2022, we stayed all appellate deadlines in this case pending mediation. 

The parties have notified this court the mediation was unsuccessful and have jointly requested 

that we lift the stay. Appellee further requests the court to impose a deadline for her brief due no 

earlier than October 14, 2022.

The stay is lifted, and this appeal is reinstated. We order appellee to file her brief, if 

any, no later than October 14, 2022.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
### §2305. Use of FMHA funds

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Federal assistance made available by the Farmers Home Administration may be used to pay the non-Federal share of any other Federal grant-in-aid program for any project for water resources, including water pollution control.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §950, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4201.)
§ 550.708 Creditable service. The following types of service are creditable for computing an employee's severance pay under § 550.707: ( a ) Civilian service as an employee (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105), excluding time during a period of nonpay status that is not creditable for annual leave accrual purposes under 5 U.S.C. 6303(a);
( b ) Service performed with the United States Postal Service or the Postal Rate Commission;
( c ) Military service, including active or inactive training with the National Guard, when performed by an employee who returns to civilian service through the exercise of a restoration right provided by law, Executive order, or regulation;
( d ) Service performed by an employee of a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard, as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c), who moves to a position within the civil service employment system of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard, respectively, without a break in service of more than 3 days; and
( e ) Service performed with the government of the District of Columbia by an individual first employed by that government before October 1, 1987, excluding service as a teacher or librarian of the public schools of the District of Columbia.
[55 FR 6593, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 12405, Apr. 10, 1992; 58 FR 33499, June 18, 1993; 64 FR 69177, Dec. 10, 1999]
##### Nav Bar Menu - desktop

-  Home 
-  Search 
-  Nav Rules 
-  BNMs 
-  LNMs 
-  GPS 
-  Comms 
-  MSI 
-  AIS 
-  Ice Patrol 
-  Archives 
-  Space Ops 

                - Home

##### NAVCEN Main Menu - desktop

-  Home 
-  Search 
-  Resources 
-  Maritime Safety Information    -  Broadcast Notices to Mariners 
  -  Local Notices to Mariners 
  -  Light Lists      -  Light List Annual 
    -  Weekly Light Lists 
    -  Light List Summary of Corrections 
    -  Light List Archives 
  -  Automatic Identification System (AIS) 
  -  Maritime Telecomms 
  -  Navigation Rules 
  -  Bridge Notices 
  -  Vessel Traffic Services 
  -  International Ice Patrol 
  -  Local Variance Depository 
-  Nav Systems and Services 
-  Waterways 
-  Contact Us/Report a Problem 

##### NAVCEN Main Menu - mobile

-  Home 
-  Search 
-  Resources 
-  Maritime Safety Information    -  Broadcast Notices to Mariners 
  -  Local Notices to Mariners 
  -  Light Lists      -  Light List Annual 
    -  Weekly Light Lists 
    -  Light List Summary of Corrections 
    -  Light List Archives 
  -  Automatic Identification System (AIS) 
  -  Maritime Telecomms 
  -  Navigation Rules 
  -  Bridge Notices 
  -  Vessel Traffic Services 
  -  International Ice Patrol 
  -  Local Variance Depository 
-  Nav Systems and Services 
-  Waterways 
-  Contact Us/Report a Problem 

## Light Lists
#### § 595.106 What termination and refund provisions are required?

Each service agreement entered into by an agency and a physician under the comparability allowance program must prescribe the terms under which the agreement may be terminated and the amount of allowance, if any, required to be refunded by the physician for each reason for termination. In the case of each service agreement covering a period of service of more than 1 year, the service agreement must include a provision that, if the physician completes more than 1 year of service pursuant to the agreement, but fails to complete the full period of service specified in the agreement either voluntarily or because of misconduct by the physician, the physician must refund the amount of allowance he or she has received under the agreement for the 26 weeks of service immediately preceding the termination (or for a longer period, if specified in the agreement).

[69 FR 27818, May 17, 2004]
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection
with the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Yanzhou Coal Company Limited (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, WU Xiangqian, General Manager of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                             
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: September 7, 2016
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ WU Xiangqian            
|Name:                   |  | WU Xiangqian                
|Title:                  |  | Director and General Manager
§ 2634.501 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart establishes the procedures of the Office of Government Ethics for enforcement of the qualified blind trust, qualified diversified trust, and independent trustee provisions of title I of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, and the regulation issued thereunder (subpart D of this part).
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart applies to all trustee approvals and trust certifications pursuant to §§ 2634.405 and 2634.407, respectively.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-020 March 28, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH FPL OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Florida Power & Light officials

on Tuesday, April 8, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the St.

Lucie nuclear power plant on Hutchinson Island off the east coast of Florida.

The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Pelican Room of the Courtyard by Marriott, 10978

S. Ocean Drive, in Jensen Beach, Florida. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC

officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Florida Power & Light addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, St. Lucie

operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a level

requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is

available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/stl_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will also

conduct inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders, and a review

of the plant staff’s activities in response to an NRC Bulletin on reactor vessel heads and vessel head

penetrations.

 Current performance indicators for the two units at the St. Lucie plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/STL1/stl1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/STL2/stl2_chart.html

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-036 February 25, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET MARCH 3-5 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting March 3-5 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the draft Safety Evaluation

Report related to the North Anna, Va., Early Site Permit application. The committee will also discuss a

revised draft of an NRC technical report, “Estimating Loss-of-Coolant Accident Frequencies Through

the Elicitation Process,” and a proposed rulemaking package for using risk insights in revising the

NRC’s regulations on “Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light-Water

Nuclear Power Reactors.”

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. The meeting will run from 8:30 a.m. to 6:45 p.m. on Thursday and Friday, and

from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. on Saturday. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2005/ .

Individuals with questions or those wanting to make public statements during the meeting

should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364.

###