alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §20920. Public access to sex offender information through the Internet

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in this section, each jurisdiction shall make available on the Internet, in a manner that is readily accessible to all jurisdictions and to the public, all information about each sex offender in the registry. The jurisdiction shall maintain the Internet site in a manner that will permit the public to obtain relevant information for each sex offender by a single query for any given zip code or geographic radius set by the user. The jurisdiction shall also include in the design of its Internet site all field search capabilities needed for full participation in the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website and shall participate in that website as provided by the Attorney General.

#### (b) Mandatory exemptions

A jurisdiction shall exempt from disclosure—

(1) the identity of any victim of a sex offense;

(2) the Social Security number of the sex offender;

(3) any reference to arrests of the sex offender that did not result in conviction; and

(4) any other information exempted from disclosure by the Attorney General.

#### (c) Optional exemptions

A jurisdiction may exempt from disclosure—

(1) any information about a tier I sex offender convicted of an offense other than a specified offense against a minor;

(2) the name of an employer of the sex offender;

(3) the name of an educational institution where the sex offender is a student; and

(4) any other information exempted from disclosure by the Attorney General.

#### (d) Links

The site shall include, to the extent practicable, links to sex offender safety and education resources.

#### (e) Correction of errors

The site shall include instructions on how to seek correction of information that an individual contends is erroneous.

#### (f) Warning

The site shall include a warning that information on the site should not be used to unlawfully injure, harass, or commit a crime against any individual named in the registry or residing or working at any reported address. The warning shall note that any such action could result in civil or criminal penalties.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title I, §118, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 596.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Website, referred to in subsec. (a), is located at https://www.nsopw.gov.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16918 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 532.513 Flexible and compressed work schedules.

Federal Wage System employees who are authorized to work flexible and compressed work schedules under sections 6122 and 6127 of title 5, United States Code, shall be paid premium pay in accordance with subchapter II of chapter 61 of title 5, United States Code. Subpart D of part 610 of this chapter supplements subchapter II and must be read together with it.

[62 FR 28307, May 23, 1997]
---

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMG Oil Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Michael Hart                 | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|                               | 
|Name: Michael Hart             | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 
|December 18, 2008              | 

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jack Norton, Appellant.

Appeal dismissed upon stipulation filed.
### §701b–4. Administration of surveys; number authorized; reports

The surveys authorized to be performed under the direction of the Secretary of the Army as well as all duties performed by the Chief of Engineers under the direction of the Secretary of the Army shall be functions of the Engineer Corps, United States Army, and its head, to be administered under the direction of the Secretary of the Army and the supervision of the Chief of Engineers except as otherwise specifically provided by Congress: Provided, That the power and authority conferred by the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and previously conferred, upon the Federal Power Commission shall remain in full force and effect: Provided, That no preliminary examination, survey, project, or estimate for new works other than those designated in this Act or some prior Act or joint resolution shall be made: Provided further, That after the regular or formal reports made as required by law on any examination, survey, project, or work under way or proposed, are submitted, no supplemental or additional report or estimate shall be made unless authorized by law.

(Aug. 11, 1939, ch. 699, §6, 53 Stat. 1415; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, referred to in text, is act June 28, 1938, ch. 795, 52 Stat. 1215, which to the extent classified to the Code is classified to sections 701b, 701b–1, 701b–2, 701c–1, 701f–1, 701i, 701j, 702a–11⁄2, 702a–11, and 706 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

This Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 11, 1939, ch. 699, 53 Stat. 1414, which to the extent classified to the Code enacted sections 558b–1, 701b–3, 701b–4, and 707 of this title and amended sections 701c–1 and 701g of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

The Federal Power Commission was terminated, and its functions, personnel, property, funds, etc., were transferred to the Secretary of Energy (except for certain functions which were transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) by sections 7151(b), 7171(a), 7172(a), 7291, and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Power Commission, with certain reservations, to chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 9 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Exhibit 32
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As Adopted Pursuant To
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Loving, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.
 
 
 
 By:
/s/ William A. Loving, Jr.Name:
William A. Loving, Jr.Title:
Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 By:
/s/ L. Kirk BillingsleyName:
L. Kirk BillingsleyTitle:
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 Date:  August 11, 2009
473 P.2d 911

#### EVCO, a New Mexico Corporation, d/b/a Evco Instructional Designs, Respondent, v. Franklin JONES, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue of the State of New Mexico and the Bureau of Revenue of the State of New Mexico, Petitioners.

No. 9096.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

July 31, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari he and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 430, 81 N.M. 724, 472 P.2d 987, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
#### § 831.2501 Purpose.

This subpart contains regulations of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to supplement chapter 66, title 42, United States Code, concerning CSRS retirement service credit eligibility for Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA) volunteers.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amendment to the Quarterly Report of Brinx Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Leroy Halterman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Leroy Halterman


Leroy Halterman


President, Secretary & Treasurer


(principal executive and financial officer)







Date:  September 18, 2009
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Maurice Heller, as Executor of Morris A. Fischer, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent. Gussie Fischer et al., Respondents-Appellants; Samuel J. Krinn, Special Guardian for Eric Flanders and Others, Infants, Respondent-Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 367.]
# L_2018297EN.01003001.xml

| 22.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 24/2017

of 3 February 2017

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1758]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1444 of 31 August 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance hydrocortisone aceponate (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1444 of 31 August 2016 amending Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 as regards the substance hydrocortisone aceponate (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 13 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010) of Chapter XIII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32016 R 1444: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1444 of 31 August 2016 (OJ L 235, 1.9.2016, p. 8).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32016 R 1444: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1444 of 31 August 2016 (OJ L 235, 1.9.2016, p. 8).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1444 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 February 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 235, 1.9.2016, p. 8.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-10262

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.

v.  CR-04-00111-HDM/

RA JUAN VILLA-LARA,

Defendant-Appellant. ORDER 

Filed July 6, 2006

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Arthur L. Alarcón, and

M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The request to publish the unpublished Memorandum disposition is granted. The Memorandum disposition filed May

9, 2006, is redesignated as an authored Opinion by Judge

Hug. 

7381
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2006 Thomson/West.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: Tuesday, November 16, 2004, at 7 p.m. local time.

Place: North West Georgia Trade and Convention Center, Lecture Hall 
Theater, 2211 Dug Gap Battle Road, Dalton, Georgia, (Telephone No. 1-
800-824-7469).

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board (CSB) is convening a community meeting in connection with its 
investigation of a toxic gas release that occurred on April 12, 2004, 
at the MFG Chemical Inc. facility located in Dalton, Georgia.
    At the meeting CSB staff will present their preliminary 
investigative findings to the Board, including a summary of the 
incident. There will also be a panel discussion consisting of five 
emergency response organizations. After the staff presentations the 
Board will allow time for public comment.
    All staff presentations are preliminary and are intended solely to 
allow the Board to consider in a public forum the issues and factors 
involved in the incident. Factual analyses, conclusions, or findings 
contained in the staff presentations should not be considered final.
    This meeting will be open to the public. Please notify CSB if a 
translator or interpreter is needed, at least five (5) business days 
prior to the meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Daniel Horowitz, (202) 261-7600.

    Dated: November 1, 2004.
Christopher W. Warner,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-24701 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
§ 550.903 Establishment of hazard pay differentials. ( a ) A schedule of hazard pay differentials, the hazardous duties or duties involving physical hardship for which they are payable, and the period during which they are payable is set out as appendix A to this subpart and incorporated in and made a part of this section.
( b ) Amendments to appendix A of this subpart may be made by OPM on its own motion or at the request of the head of an agency (or authorized designee). The head of an agency (or authorized designee) may recommend the rate of hazard pay differential to be established and must submit, with its request for an amendment, information about the hazardous duty or duty involving physical hardship showing— ( 1 ) The nature of the duty;
( 2 ) The degree to which the employee is exposed to hazard or physical hardship;
( 3 ) The length of time during which the duty will continue to exist;
( 4 ) The degree to which control may be exercised over the physical hardship or hazard; and
( 5 ) The estimated annual cost to the agency if the request is approved.
[56 FR 20344, May 3, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 69179, Dec. 10, 1999]
§ 581.306 Lack of moneys due from, or payable by, a governmental entity served with legal process; transfer of service of legal process to another governmental entity. ( a ) When legal process is served on a governmental entity, and the individual identified in the legal process as the obligor is found not to be entitled to moneys (the entitlement to which is based upon remuneration for employment) due from, or payable by, the governmental entity, the entity shall follow the procedures set forth in the legal process for that contingency or, if no procedures are set forth therein, shall return the legal process to the court, or other authority from which it was issued, and advise the court, or other authority, that no moneys, the entitlement to which is based upon remuneration for employment, are due from, or payable by, the governmental entity to the named individual.
( b ) Where it appears that remuneration for employment is only temporarily exhausted or otherwise unavailable, the court, or other authority, shall be fully advised as to why, and for how long, the remuneration will be unavailable, if that information is known by the governmental entity.
( c ) In instances where an employee obligor separates from his/her employment with a governmental entity which is presently honoring a continuing legal process, the entity shall inform the party who caused the legal process to be served, or the party's representative, and the court, or other authority, that the payments are being discontinued. In cases where the obligor has a Thrift Savings Fund account, or has retired, or has separated and requested a refund of retirement contributions, or transferred, or is receiving benefits under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, or where the employee obligor has been employed by either another governmental entity or by a private employer, and where this information is known by the governmental entity, the governmental entity shall provide the party with the designated agent for the new disbursing governmental entity or with the name and address of the private employer.
( d ) In instances where an employee obligor, who is employed by a governmental entity which is honoring a continuing legal process, enters phased retirement status in accordance with part 831, subpart Q, and part 848 of this chapter, the entity must inform the party who caused the legal process to be served, or the party's representative, and the court or other authority, that remuneration for employment will continue at a reduced rate and that the employee obligor will be receiving a phased retirement annuity. The governmental entity must provide the party with the designated agent at the Office of Personnel Management who is responsible for the disbursement of retirement benefits.
[45 FR 85667, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 26281, June 7, 1983; 55 FR 1357, Jan. 16, 1990; 58 FR 35846, July 2, 1993; 79 FR 46618, Aug. 8, 2014]
Stability Assessment of a Hurricane Mitch-induced Landslide Dam on the Río La Lima, Sierra de las Minas, Eastern Guatemala

#### *By* Robert L. Schuster, Robert C. Bucknam, *and* Manuel
Antonio Mota

Version 1.0



The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format. The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge, click here.

English-version PDF file (2.1 MB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)

Spanish-version PDF file (2.2 MB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)

separator bar



|AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2001/ofr-01-0120/
Questions or Assistance: USGS Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wed Dec  7 18:26 EDT 2016

---
#### Lucy Montefusco et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. City of New York, Defendant, and Lotli, Inc., Respondent-Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and loss of services, order denying plaintiffs’ motion to preclude defendant Lotli, Inc., from giving evidence at the trial in respect of the matters as to which a bill of particulars was ordered, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order denying the motion of defendant Lotli, Inc., to resettle the order directing the furnishing of a bill of particulars, dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Can well, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Wolin, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Levine, Appellant.

Judgments affirmed. No opinion. Present — Glennon, *768J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse, dismiss the informations and remit the fines on the ground that the guilt of the defendants was not established beyond a reasonable doubt.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**NAKIA A. YANCY,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**HON. JACQULINE F. ALLEN,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 135 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are**  GRANTED **. The Court of**

**Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is** DIRECTED **to adjudicate Petitioner’s pending**

**filings within 90 days. The Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to serve this order on the**

**President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philad elphia County and to strike the** 

**name of the jurist from the caption.**