alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31,                2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending March 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                BioTex Holdings, Inc. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                October 19, 2007                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| */s/                Scott J. Silverman    *                                               |
| Scott                J. SilvermanChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
# L_2018240EN.01000101.xml

| 25.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and New Zealand pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 13 March 2018, will enter into force on 1 October 2018.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 185, 23.7.2018, p. 3.

1

---
§ 610.406 Holiday for employees on compressed work schedules. ( a ) If a full-time employee is relieved or prevented from working on a day designated as a holiday by Federal statute or Executive order, the employee is entitled to basic pay for the number of hours of the compressed work schedule on that day.
( b ) If a part-time employee is relieved or prevented from working on a day within the employee's scheduled tour of duty that is designated as a holiday by Federal statute or Executive order, the employee is entitled to basic pay for the number of hours of the compressed work schedule on that day. When a holiday falls on a nonworkday of a part-time employee, he or she is not entitled to an in-lieu-of day for that holiday.
#### IN RE DISBARMENT OF JOE H. KIRBY.

(170 N. W. 635).

(File No. 4433.

Opinion filed February 11, 1919.)

Disbarment — Unprofessional Conduct, Findings Sustaining — Misconduct Re But One Matter — Young Attorney — Nonl.mercenary Motives, Regret Exhibited, Effect Re Disbarment — Costs.

Although findings of fact show respondent guilty of unprofessional conduct such, as, if that of an older and more experienced lawyer, would disclose him unfit to be a practitioner at the bar, yet, the charges preferred relating but to one matter, his professional conduct otherwise having been free from criticism, and he being barely past his majority, and having been admitted to practice but about five months, and misconduct not appearing to have been prompted by mercenary motives, he having evidenced sincere regret for same and a desire to make good such financial loss as may have resulted to his client through his misconduct; the proceedings will be dismissed, but at respondent’s cost.

Original proceedings. In re disbarment proceedings against Joe II. Kirby.

Proceedings dismissed.

*C. C. Caldwell,*Attorney General, and *B. S. Payne,*Assistant-Attorney General, representing *the*Court.

*Aikens & Judge,*for Respondent.

WHITING, J.

This proceeding was heard by this court and our findings of facts and conclusions of law are on file. Reference is made to such findings and conclusions as well as to the transcript of evidence.

[1] Prom the findings of fact it appears that respondent, aduly admitted attorney át law of this court, was guilty of unprofessional conduct such as, if that of an older and more experienced lawyer, would disclose him unfit to be a practitioner at the bar of this or any other court..

The misconduct charged and proven relates to but one matter, and, so far as we are advised, his professional conduct has in *406other matters been free from cause’for criticism. He was, at the time of said misconduct, barely past his majority, and had been admitted to practice hut four or five months. Such misconduct does not appear to have been prompted by mercenary motives. Moreover, he has evidenced a sincere regret for same, as well as' a desire to make good such financial loss as may have resulted to his client through his misdoing.

We are convinced that respondent is now and will continue-to be a proper person to practice law in the courts of this state. This proceeding is therefore dismissed, but at respondent’s cost.
§ 731.105 Authority to take suitability actions. ( a ) Neither OPM nor an agency acting under delegated authority may take a suitability action in connection with any application for, or appointment to, a position that is not subject to investigation or check under § 731.104.
( b ) OPM may take a suitability action under this part against an *applicant* or *appointee* based on any of the criteria of § 731.202;
( c ) Except as limited by § 731.103(g), an agency, exercising delegated authority, may take a suitability action under this part against an *applicant* or *appointee* based on the criteria of § 731.202;
( d ) OPM may take a suitability action under this part against an *employee* based on the criteria of § 731.202(b)(3), (4), or (8).
( e ) An agency may not take a suitability action against an *employee.* Nothing in this part precludes an agency from taking an adverse action against an employee under the procedures and standards of part 752 of this chapter or terminating a probationary employee under the procedures of part 315 or part 359 of this chapter. An agency must notify OPM to the extent required in § 731.103(g) if it wants to take, or has taken, action under these authorities.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
      Corp., Manager of the RegistrantFebruary
      8, 2011
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.236 When do COLA and post differential payments end? Subject to § 591.237(a), agencies stop paying an employee a COLA or post differential on— ( a ) Separation,
( b ) The effective date of assignment or transfer to a new official worksite outside the COLA or post differential area, or
( c ) In the case of an employee on detail to temporary duty in a post differential area, the ending date of the detail.
#### Johnny Paul DODSON *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 02-878

146 S.W.3d 893

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 12, 2004

*119
      *Hurst & Morrissey, P.L.L. C.,*by: Q. *Byrum Hurst,*for petitioner.

*Mike Beebe,*Att’y Gen., by: *Clayton K. Hodges,*Ass’t Att’y Gen., for respondent.

Per Curiam.

Johnny Paul Dodson was found guilty by a jury of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced as a habitual offender to life imprisonment. Dodson lodged an appeal from the judgment in this court on August 21, 2002. His attorney, Q. Byrum Hurst, was scheduled to file the appellant’s brief on September 30, 2002.

Counsel filed a series of motions for extensions of time to file the brief which were granted. The brief was not timely filed, however, and counsel sought leave to file a belated brief, which we granted on March 6, 2003. The appellee subsequently filed a motion to direct compliance with Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(h). The motion was granted on May 15, 2003, and appellant was allowed until June 24, 2003, to submit a complying brief.

Counsel sought another extension of time and was allowed until June 29, 2003, to submit the brief. (Counsel was notified at that time that no further extensions would be granted.) When the brief was tendered on Monday, June 30, 2003, it contained only an abstract and was accordingly returned to be corrected. The brief was due July 7, 2003, but not filed.

On July 24, 2003, the appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that counsel had failed to file a brief or request leave to file a belated brief. Counsel did not respond to the appellee’s motion, and we granted it by *per curiam*order entered September 4, 2003.

On December 22, 2003, appellee Dodson filed the instant *pro se*motion in which he urges this court to reinstate the appeal because he was denied effective assistance of counsel by his attorney’s failure to file a brief that conformed to the rules of this court. We find merit in appellant’s argument and reinstate the appeal.

Mr. Hurst did not act to protect appellant’s right to appeal and thus denied him the effective appellate representation guaranteed to a convicted criminal defendant by the Sixth Amend*120ment. *See Pennsylvania v. Finley,*481 U.S. 551 (1987). The direct appeal of a conviction is a matter of right, and a State cannot penalize a criminal defendant by declining to consider his or her first appeal when counsel has failed to follow mandatory appellate rules. *Franklin v. State,*317 Ark. 42, 875 S.W.2d 836 (1994); *see Evitts v. Lucey,*469 U.S. 387 (1985).

Because Mr. Hurst has not been relieved as counsel, he remains attorney-of-record and responsible for the appeal. He is directed to file within seven days of the date of this opinion a motion to file a belated brief. Mr. Hurst is further directed to appear before this court on Thursday, February 26, 2004, at 9. a.m, and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to protect appellant’s right to a first appeal.

Motion granted.
TN: DT-99-08

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Directive 10.133, "Light and Limited Duty

Program"

Purpose: The titles for Management Directives 10.132 and 10.133

have been eliminated and marked "RESERVED."

The Office of Human Resources will issue the information

regarding these two programs as NUREG/BR-0235.

Management Directives 10.132 and 10.133 were never

issued.

Please place this directive transmittal under Tab 10.133

to show that this number is now reserved.

Office and

Division of Origin: Office of Human Resources

Contact: Randall Brown, 415-7111

Date Approved: February 8, 1999

Volume: 10 Personnel Management

Part: 5 Benefits, Health Services, and Employee Safety

Directive: 10.133 [RESERVED]

Availability: Rules and Directives Branch

Office of Administration

Michael T. Lesar, (301) 415-7163

Christy Moore, (301) 415-7086

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
### §27a. Chicago River, West Fork of South Branch

That portion of the West Fork of the South Branch of the Chicago River in Cook County, Illinois, lying between the west line (produced north) of the Collateral Channel of the Sanitary District of Chicago, in the northwest quarter of section 36, township 39 north, range 13 east, third principal meridian, and a line one thousand three hundred feet east of and parallel to the west line of section 30 (section line in South Western Avenue), township 39 north, range 13 east, third principal meridian, in the city of Chicago, Illinois, as the same now exists or may hereafter be extended, is declared to be a nonnavigable stream within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(Aug. 30, 1935, ch. 831, §10, 49 Stat. 1048.)
§ 5701.101 Prior approval for outside employment. ( a ) Before engaging in any outside employment, whether or not for compensation, an employee of the Federal Trade Commission, other than a Commissioner, must obtain the written approval of his or her supervisor and the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) or his or her designee. Requests for approval shall be forwarded through normal supervisory channels to the DAEO and shall include, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) A statement of the name of the person, group, or organization for whom the work is to be performed; the type of work to be performed; and the proposed hours of work and approximate dates of employment;
( 2 ) The employee's certification that the outside employment will not depend in any way on information obtained as a result of the employee's official Government position;
( 3 ) The employee's certification that no official duty time or Government property, resource, or facilities not available to the general public will be used in connection with the outside employment;
( 4 ) The employee's certification that he has read, is familiar with, and will abide by the restrictions contained in all applicable Federal laws and regulations, including those found in 18 U.S.C. chapter 11 and those found or referenced in subpart H (“Outside Activities”) of 5 CFR part 2635 (Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch); and
( 5 ) The written approval of the employee's immediate supervisor.
( b ) Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation. In the case of an employee who wishes to practice a profession involving a fiduciary relationship, as defined in 5 CFR 2636.305(b), approval will be granted only on a case-by-case basis.
( c ) For purposes of this section, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the employee, whether or not for compensation. It includes but it is not limited to personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, or trustee. Prior approval is not required, however, to participate in the activities of a nonprofit charitable, religious, professional, social, fraternal, educational, recreational, public service, or civic organization, unless such activities involve the provision of professional services or advice or are for compensation other than reimbursement of expenses.
[58 FR 30695, May 27, 1993]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY**

**SECTION 302CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Dan W. Matthias, certify that:

 

1.                    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of Mothers Work, Inc.;

 

2.                    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                    The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a—15(e) and 15d—15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

b)        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)         disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.                    The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)         all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| May 17, 2004 |                      | **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS** |   |
|--------------|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date         | Dan W. Matthias           |                    |
|         | *Chief Executive Officer* |                    |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2040 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2040

   To amend the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 to 
extend certain contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and certain 
  irrigation water contractors in the States of Wyoming and Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2003

 Mr. Osborne introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 to 
extend certain contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and certain 
  irrigation water contractors in the States of Wyoming and Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN IRRIGATION PROJECT CONTRACTS.

    Section 2 of the Irrigation Project Contract Extension Act of 1998 
(112 Stat. 2816, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A-70) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``December 31, 2003'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 2005''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``beyond 
                December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``beyond December 31, 
                2005''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``prior to 
                December 31, 2003'' and inserting ``before December 31, 
                2005''.
                                 <all>
```
### §123. National Forest Products Week

(a) Designation.—The week beginning on the third Sunday in October is National Forest Products Week.

(b) Proclamation.—The President is requested to issue each year a proclamation calling on the people of the United States to observe National Forest Products Week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1259.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 123(a) | 36:163 (words before comma). | Sept. 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–753, 74 Stat. 898. |
| 123(b) | 36:163 (words after comma). | |

Section

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Proc. No. 8442. National Forest Products Week

Proc. No. 8442, Oct. 23, 2009, 74 F.R. 55437, provided:

America's forests have helped spur the growth and development that has been indispensable to our Nation's success. They have provided timber and water, as well as habitat for wildlife and opportunities for recreational activities. As a repository for renewable natural resources, forests have supplied the raw materials that have sustained us throughout our history. During National Forest Products Week, we recognize the value of our woodlands and commit ourselves to good stewardship and conservation practices that help us to responsibly manage our Nation's forests.

As a renewable and recyclable resource, wood is one of our Nation's most environmentally friendly building materials. Wood fiber is used throughout our daily lives, from the paper we write on to the offices where we work. We value the beauty of wood in our furniture, in our homes, and in artwork that surrounds us. Today, modern technology and stewardship practices by Federal, State, tribal, and private landowners have improved the way we manage our natural resources so that forests can meet the needs of current and future generations.

Forests are one of the foundations on which our Nation was formed; they are the backbone of our environment. This week, we recognize the value of forest products and the importance of their sustainable use to our lives.

To recognize the importance of products from our forests, the Congress, by Public Law 86–753 (36 U.S.C. 123), as amended, has designated the week beginning on the third Sunday in October of each year as National Forest Products Week and has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this week.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim the week beginning on the third Sunday in October of each year as National Forest Products Week. I call on all Americans to celebrate the varied uses and products of our forested lands, as well as the people who carry on the tradition of careful stewardship of these precious natural resources for generations to come.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

Barack Obama.