alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 831.1208 Termination of disability annuity because of recovery. ( a ) Each annuitant receiving disability annuity from the Fund shall be examined under the direction of OPM at the end of 1 year from the date of disability retirement and annually thereafter until the annuitant becomes 60 years of age unless the disability is found by OPM to be permanent in character. OPM may order a medical or other examination at any time to determine the facts relative to the nature and degree of disability of the annuitant. Failure to submit to reexamination shall result in suspension of annuity.
( b ) A disability annuitant may request medical reevaluation under the provisions of this section at any time. OPM will reevaluate the medical condition of disability annuitants age 60 or over only on their own request.
( c ) Recovery based on medical documentation. When an examination or reevaluation shows that a disability annuitant has medically recovered from the disability, OPM will terminate the annuity effective on the first day of the month beginning 1 year after the date of the medical examination showing recovery.
( d ) Recovery based on reemployment by the Federal Government. Reemployment by an agency at any time before age 60 is evidence of recovery if the reemployment is in a permanent position at the same or higher grade or pay level as the position from which the disability annuitant retired. The permanent position must be full-time unless the position the disability annuitant occupied immediately before retirement was less than full-time, in which case the permanent position must have a work schedule of no less time than that of the position from which the disability annuitant retired. In this instance, OPM needs no medical documentation to find the annuitant recovered. Disability annuity payments will terminate effective on the first day of the month following the month in which the recovery finding is made under this paragraph.
( e ) Recovery based on a voluntary request. OPM will honor a written and signed statement of medical recovery voluntarily filed by a disability annuitant when the medical documentation on file does not demonstrate that the annuitant is mentally incompetent. OPM needs no other documentation to find the annuitant recovered. Disability annuity payments will terminate effective on the first day of the month beginning 1 year after the date of the statement. A disability annuitant can withdraw the statement only if the withdrawal is received by OPM before annuity payments terminate.
( f ) When an agency reemploys a recovered disability annuitant at any grade or rate of pay within the 1-year period pending termination of the disability retirement benefit under paragraph (c), (d), or (e) of this section, OPM will terminate the annuity effective on the date of reemployment.
#### § 532.101 Scope.

This part provides common policies, systems, and practices for uniform application by all agencies subject to section 5342 of title 5, United States Code, in fixing pay for prevailing rate employees as nearly as is consistent with the public interest in accordance with prevailing rates.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.



Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the
Companies)



Written Statement by Chief
Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-K annual
report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Michael D. Lockhart 
|                        
|Michael D. Lockhart     
|Chief Executive Officer 
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Michael D. Lockhart              
|                                     
|Michael D. Lockhart                  
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.     



Dated: March 4, 2004
#### § 7.1 Discretion in filling vacancies.

In his discretion, an appointing officer may fill any position in the competitive service either by competitive appointment from a civil service register or by noncompetitive selection of a present or former Federal employee, in accordance with the Civil Service Regulations. He shall exercise his discretion in all personnel actions solely on the basis of merit and fitness and without regard to political or religious affiliations, marital status, or race.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Robert M. Neumeister, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media East LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors or (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 8, 2005 /s/ Robert M. Neumeister, Jr   Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.   Executive Vice President and
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0228 - Denial of a Petition for Rulemaking to Codify FEMA GM EV-2, "Protective Actions for School Children," Into the Emergency Planning Regulations in 10 CFR Part 50 (PRM-50-81)

Accession Number: ML061420139

Date Released: Monday, March 5, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML061420148 - SECY-06-0228 - Denial of a Petition for Rulemaking to Codify FEMA GM EV-2, "Protective Actions for School Children," into the Emergency Planning Regulations in 10 CFR Part 50 (PRM-50-81) (4 page(s), 11/21/2006)
    - ML061420182 - SECY-06-0228 - Attachment 1 - Federal Register Notice Denial of Petition for Rulemaking PRM -50-81 (5 page(s), 11/21/2006)
    - ML061420229 - SECY-06-0228 - Attachment 2 - Letter to Mr. Eric J. Epstein re: PRM-50-81 (1 page(s), 11/21/2006)
    - ML061420245 - SECY-06-0228 - Attachment 3 - Federal Register Notice of Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-79 (5 page(s), 11/21/2006)
    - ML061740582 - Daycare FRN Revision (25 page(s), 8/1/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 1 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 2 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 3 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 4 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 5 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 6 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 7 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 8 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 9 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 10 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 11 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 12 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 13 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 14 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 15 of 16 

 
M13003 Pollution Prevention 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 16 of 16
Order entered March 17, 2020

In the

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01239-CV

IN RE EDUKID, LP, Relator

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-01603-2017

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT the petition 

for a writ of mandamus as to both the trial court’s September 27, 2019 “Order on Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Strike Edukid’s Opinion Testimony Witness Designation for Failure to Designate as 

an Expert Witness and Provide an Adequate Expert Report” (the Exclusion Order) and its 

September 27, 2019 “Order Denying Defendant Edukid’s Motion for Protective Order and 

Motion to Quash” (the Denial Order).

We ORDER the trial court to issue a written ruling, within thirty days of the date of this 

Order, that: (1) vacates the Exclusion Order in its entirety; (2) vacates the portion of the Denial 

Order denying Edukid’s motion for a protective order to the extent it deals with deposition 

questions concerning the opinions of testifying experts; and (3) grants Edukid’s motion for a 

protective order to the extent the deposition of Edukid’s corporate representative may not include 
questions concerning the opinions of testifying experts. We further ORDER the trial court to file 

with this Court, within thirty-five days of the date of this Order, a certified copy of its written 

ruling evidencing such compliance. Should the trial court fail to comply with this Order, the writ 

will issue. We LIFT this Court’s October 17, 2019 stay of trial-court proceedings. 

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Set forth below are the
Companys subsidiaries, their respective states of incorporation or organization and the percentage of outstanding shares or other voting interests held by the Company in each of such subsidiaries as of the date of this Annual Report.



|                        |  |                                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Name of Subsidiary      |  | State of Incorporation or Organization |  | Percentage Ownership
|                        |  |                                       
|Pacific Mercantile Bank |  | A California corporation               |  | 100%                
|                        |  |                                       
|PMB Statutory Trust III |  | A Connecticut trust                    |  | 100%                
|                        |  |                                       
|PMB Capital Trust III   |  | A Delaware trust                       |  | 100%
#### § 430.402 Definitions.

In this subpart—

*Appraisal system* means the policies, practices, and procedures an agency establishes under 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 and 5 CFR part 430, subparts B and C, or other applicable legal authority, for planning, monitoring, developing, evaluating, and rewarding employee performance. This includes appraisal systems and appraisal programs as defined at § 430.203 and performance management systems as defined at § 430.303.

*GPRA* means the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.

*OMB* means the Office of Management and Budget.

*OPM* means the Office of Personnel Management.

*Outstanding performance* means performance that substantially exceeds the normally high performance expected of any senior employee, as evidenced by exceptional accomplishments or contributions to the agency's performance.

*Performance evaluation* means the comparison of the actual performance of senior employees against their performance expectations and may take into account their contribution to agency performance, where appropriate.

*Performance expectations* means critical and other performance elements and performance requirements that constitute the senior executive performance plans (as defined in § 430.303) established for senior executives, the performance elements and standards that constitute the performance plans (as defined in § 430.203) established for senior professionals, or other appropriate means authorized under performance appraisal systems not covered by 5 U.S.C. chapter 43 for communicating what a senior employee is expected to do and the manner in which he/she is expected to do it, and may include contribution to agency performance, where appropriate.

*Program performance measures* means results-oriented measures of performance, whether at the agency, component, or function level, which include, for example, measures under the Government Performance and Results Act.

*PRB* means Performance Review Board, as described at § 430.310.

*Relative performance* means the performance of a senior employee with respect to the performance of other senior employees, including their contribution to agency performance, where appropriate, as determined by the application of a certified appraisal system.

*Senior employee* means a senior executive or a senior professional.

*Senior executive* means a member of the Senior Executive Service (SES) paid under 5 U.S.C. 5383.

*Senior professional* means an employee in a senior-level (SL) or scientific or professional position (ST) paid under 5 U.S.C. 5376.
Voluntary Surrender of Section 333 Exemption and COAs 

Dave [publisher@gasecuritymagazine.onmicrosoft.com] 

Dear Administrator,

With immediate effect, Planehook Aviation Services, LLC voluntarily surrenders its Section 333 

exemption, certificate 2016­CSA­14695­659­333E (Regulatory Docket No. FAA­2015­4858, Exemption 

#14695, FAA ltr Feb 5, 2016), its associated Blanket COA, and COA for the San Antonio, Texas area 

(2016­CSA­14695­659­333E, dated Jun 23, 2016). Planehook Aviation Services, LLC believes itself to be 

in full compliance with and will continue flight operations in accordance with 14 CFR 101 and 14 CFR 

107.

I am pleased to continue to champion sUAS flight safety as a FAA Safety Team Representative.

Sincerely,

Dave Hook

David C. Hook, CFII, ATP, RP/sUAS

President

Planehook Aviation Services, LLC

TLSC# B17127

Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:04 PM 

To: 9-AJV-115-UASOrganization (FAA); 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA); 9-AFS-UAS-Inquiries (FAA)

Voluntary Surrender of Section 333 Exemption and COAs Page 1 of 1

https://email.dot.gov/owa/9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions@faa.gov/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Not... 11/21/2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of change in meeting date. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest's Madison-Beaverhead Resource Advisory Committee's meeting date has been changed to Wednesday, December 1, 2004, from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m., in Ennis, Montana, for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, December 1, 2004 (changed from November 9).

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Forest Service office at 5 Forest Service Road, Ennis, MT 59729.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas K. Reilly, Designated Forest Official (DFO), Forest Supervisor, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, at (406) 683-3973.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics for these meetings include hearing and deciding on proposals for projects to fund under Title II of Pub. L. 106-393, hearing public comments, and other business. If the meeting location changes, notice will be posted in local newspapers, including the Dillon Tribune and The Montana Standard.

Dated: October 29, 2004.

Thomas K. Reilly,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 04-24808 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Merrimack,

Dec., 1896.

#### Concord *v.*Boston & Maine Railroad.

It is the duty of a railroad corporation to light a covered highway bridge over its tracks, when the public safety requires it.

Debt, for money paid for lighting a covered bridge on a highway in Concord. Facts agreed. Prior to the building of the bridge, Bridge street crossed the defendants’ tracks at grade. The bridge was erected by the defendants about 1860 as an overhead railroad crossing, and they have maintained and kept it in repair. Within one half mile from the bridge there are one hundred inhabitants, and it is necessary that the bridge should be lighted. In June, 1895, the parties agreed that for the safety of the public the bridge should be lighted, that the expense of lighting should be paid in the first instance by the plaintiffs, and that the defendants would repay the same to the plaintiffs in case the court should determine that the expense should be borne by the defendants.

Sargent, *Hollis Niles,*for the plaintiffs.

*John M. Mitchell*and *Frank S. Streeter,*for the defendants.

Carpenter, C. J.

“ It shall be the duty of the proprietors of every railroad to provide suitable crossings ... for the accommodation of the public.” P. S., *c.*159, s. 1. The bridge is a crossing. Until it is made reasonably safe and convenient for the public use it is not suitable. It being agreed that the public safety requires the bridge to be lighted, there must be

*Judgment for the plaintiffs.*

All concurred.
Order entered April 7, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 19 - 01121 - CV CLARKE BARCUS, C - 2 - I T RENTAL, INC., 440 EQUIPMENT, LLC AND

CYRUS BARCUS, Appellant s

V. SAR AH SCHARBAUER, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. Dc - 17 - 08105

ORDER Before the Court is appellants’ April 3, 2020 unopposed second motion to extend time to file their brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 21, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### James I. Brokaw, Respondent, v. William Grant Brown, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. So opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 511.606 Form and content of an appeal. ( a ) *Employee appeal.* An employee's appeal shall be in writing, and shall contain the reasons why the employee believes his or her position is erroneously classified, or should be brought under or excluded from chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code. The agency, when forwarding the employee's appeal or when requested by the Office, shall furnish all relevant facts concerning the position and the agency's justification for its classification decision. The agency shall also comment on the information submitted by the employee if requested to do so by the Office. Either the employee or agency may submit relevant information to the Office at any time following the initial filing of an appeal.
( b ) *Agency appeal.* An agency's appeal shall be in writing, and shall contain its reasons and justification for requesting a review of the Office's certificate.
( c ) *Inspection of the Office's appellate record.* The employee, an employee's representative and the agency will be permitted to inspect the Office's appellate record on request. Agencies will make available to appellants copies of any and all information submitted by the agency to the Office with respect to the appellant's individual appeal.