alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 4.5

AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 5, 2002

THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT is dated for reference the 4th
  day of November, 2002.

BETWEEN:

LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. 
  #1103 - 11871 Horseshoe Way 
  Richmond, BC V7A 5H5 
  ("Linux")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND:

TERYL RESOURCES CORP.#1103 - 11871 Horseshoe Way 
  Richmond, BC V7A 5H5

("Teryl")

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

|A. | Linux optioned their 50% interest in
        the Fish Creek Claims for 200,000 shares of Teryl Resources Corp. and
        expenditures of $500,000 U.S. over a three-year period.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants
  and conditions set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:

|1. | Linux agrees that in consideration for
        receiving a mining lease that was not disclosed to Linux at the time of
        the March 5th, 2002 Agreement (the Original Agreement)
        both parties agree to grant Linux a back in working interest for a 25%
        interest in the mining lease after Teryl completes the $500,000 expenditures.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed
  this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

|LINUXWIZARDRY SYSTEMS, INC. |  | TERYL RESOURCES CORP.   
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                            |  |                         
|                            |  |                         
|/s/
      John Robertson    |  | /s/
      John Robertson
|Signature                   |  | Signature               
|                            |  |                         
|John
      Robertson        |  | John Robertson          
|Print Name                  |  | Print Name              
|                            |  |                         
|President                   |  | President               
|Title                       |  | Title                   



---
§ 300.506 Requirements of procurement. ( a ) Agencies must follow the Federal procurement laws and the Federal Acquisition Regulation, as applicable, in procuring services from the private sector.
( b ) Agencies should make full use of the provisions of the Federal procurement system to make clear that the firm is the legally responsible employer and to specify the obligations the firm will have to meet to provide effective performance including such matters as the types and levels of skills to be provided, deadlines for providing service, liability insurance, and, when necessary, security requirements. The Federal procurement system also requires contractors to comply with affirmative action requirements to employ and advance in employment qualified disabled and Vietnam era veterans as provided in 41 CFR part 60-250, and with public policy programs including equal employment opportunity, handicapped employment, and small businesses.
# L_2015149EN.01002101.xml

| 16.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 149/21

---

DECISION No 1/2015 OF THE EU-EFTA JOINT COMITTEE ON SIMPLIFICATION OF FORMALITIES IN TRADE IN GOODS

of 11 May 2015

as regards an invitation to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to accede to the Convention on the simplification of formalities in trade in goods [2015/920]

THE EU-EFTA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on the simplification of formalities in trade in goods (1) (‘the Convention’), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The exchange of goods with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia would be facilitated by a simplification of formalities which affect the trade in goods between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the European Union, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of Turkey. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The exchange of goods with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia would be facilitated by a simplification of formalities which affect the trade in goods between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the European Union, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of Turkey.

| (2) | With a view to achieving such facilitation, it is appropriate to invite the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to accede to the Convention, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

With a view to achieving such facilitation, it is appropriate to invite the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to accede to the Convention,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 11a of the Convention on the simplification of formalities in trade in goods, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia shall be invited to accede to the Convention as from 1 July 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Ankara, 11 May 2015.

For the EU-EFTA Joint Committee

The President

Sezai UÇARMAK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 134, 22.5.1987, p. 2.

1

---
#### § 734.408 Participation in political management and political campaigning; prohibitions.

An employee covered under this subpart may not take an active part in political management or in a political campaign, except as permitted by subpart D of this part.

[61 FR 35102, July 5, 1996]
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0144 - Proposed Reorganization of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Region II

Accession Number: ML061770301

Date Released: Monday, July 24, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML061770296 - SECY-06-0144 - Proposed Reorganization of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Region II (5 page(s), 6/24/2006)
    - ML061510345 - SECY-06-0144 - Enclosure 1 - Reorganization of NRR (6 page(s), 6/24/2006)
    - ML061510297 - SECY-06-0-144 - Enclosure 2 - Reorganization of RII (2 page(s), 6/24/2006)
    - ML061510483 - SECY-06-0144 - Enclosure 3 - Functional Statements (12 page(s), 6/24/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0297. PITTMAN v. THE STATE.

This case was docketed by this court on September 11, 2020, and appellant’s

brief and enumerations of error were due October 1, 2020. As of the date of this

order, appellant still has not filed a brief and enumeration of errors and has not

requested an extension of time in which to do so. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED as abandoned pursuant to Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

November 10, 2020

11/10/2020
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2009 |  | /s/ ANAND NALLATHAMBI  
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 734.407 Use of official authority; prohibition.

An employee covered under this subpart may not use his or her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 31, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-51113 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EUDELIO RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-650-3-AML

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eudelio Rodriguez appeals from his sentence for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Rodriguez asserts that his waiver of appeal is invalid because the Government violated the plea agreement. This court reviews de novo whether a waiver of appeal bars an appeal. United States v. Baymon , 312 F.3d 725, 727 (5th Cir. 2002).No. 03-51113 -2- Rodriguez contends that the Government violated its agreement by supporting the probation officer’s recommendation to deny him credit for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. 3E1.1(a). This lacks merit because the record shows that the Government promised not to oppose the adjustment only if the probation officer recommended it in the presentence report. At Rodriguez’s sentencing hearing, this was made clear. Thus Rodriguez’s reliance on United States v. Keresztury , 293 F.3d 750, 755-57 (5th Cir. 2002), is misplaced. The record shows that Rodriguez knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. See United States v. Portillo , 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United
States v. Dees , 125 F.3d 261, 269 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, Rodriguez’s waiver of appeal is enforceable and bars the present appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 31.2



Chief Financial Officer



I, John Lamson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN
LAMSON     
|                     |  |  |  | John Lamson            
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
# L_2016211EN.01006001.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/60

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 105/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1288]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 98 and 101 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2010/299/EU of 21 May 2010 repealing Decision 2002/627/EC establishing the European Regulators Group for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2010/299/EU of 21 May 2010 repealing Decision 2002/627/EC establishing the European Regulators Group for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Decision 2010/299/EU repeals Commission Decision 2002/627/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2010/299/EU repeals Commission Decision 2002/627/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed from the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XI and Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XI and Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 5ci (Commission Decision 2002/627/EC) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 2

The text of point 17 (The European Regulators Group for Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Commission Decision 2002/627/EC) of Protocol 37 to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 3

The text of Decision 2010/299/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 127, 26.5.2010, p. 18.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 200, 30.7.2002, p. 38.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §1302b. Small and medium publicly owned treatment works circuit rider program

#### (a) Establishment

Subject to the availability of appropriations, not later than 180 days after November 15, 2021, the Administrator shall establish a circuit rider program (referred to in this section as the "circuit rider program") under which the Administrator shall award grants to qualified nonprofit entities, as determined by the Administrator, to provide assistance to owners and operators of small and medium publicly owned treatment works to carry out the activities described in section 1382(b)(13) of this title.

#### (b) Limitation

A grant provided under the circuit rider program shall be in an amount that is not more than $75,000.

#### (c) Prioritization

In selecting recipients of grants under the circuit rider program, the Administrator shall give priority to qualified nonprofit entities, as determined by the Administrator, that would serve a community that—

(1) has a history, for not less than the 10 years prior to the award of the grant, of unresolved wastewater issues, stormwater issues, or a combination of wastewater and stormwater issues;

(2) is considered financially distressed;

(3) faces the cumulative burden of stormwater and wastewater overflow issues; or

(4) has previously failed to access Federal technical assistance due to cost-sharing requirements.

#### (d) Communication

Each qualified nonprofit entity that receives funding under this section shall, before using that funding to undertake activities to carry out this section, consult with the State in which the assistance is to be expended or otherwise made available.

#### (e) Report

Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Administrator establishes the circuit rider program, and every 2 years thereafter, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report describing—

(1) each recipient of a grant under the circuit rider program; and

(2) a summary of the activities carried out under the circuit rider program.

#### (f) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2022 through 2026.

#### (2) Limitation on use of funds

Of the amounts made available for grants under paragraph (1), not more than 2 percent may be used to pay the administrative costs of the Administrator.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title II, §224, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. E, title II, §50206, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1164.)
### MEMORANDUM

To: Docket for SO2 NAAQS From: Janet McCabe, OAR Re: Meetings on the proposed SO2 NAAQS Date: May 13, 2010

On 5/7/2010, EPA held a meeting at which provisions of the proposed SO2 Natio nal Ambient Air Quality

Standards rule were discussed. Present at the meeting were Janet McCabe, Chet Wayland, Kevin Mclean and Steve Page of EPA , Mark MacLeod and Vi cky Patton of Environmental Defense, David Barron of Earth Justice, Janice Nolan of Americ an Lung Association, and John Walke of NRDC. The topic discussed was the process fo r designating areas nonattainment under a future revised standard.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de
C.V. for the period ended December 31, 2002, I, Diego Foyo Mejia, Chief
Financial Officer of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.      this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2.      the information contained in this Form 20-F for the period ended
December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V.

Date: June 30, 2003               /s/ Diego Fogo Mejia
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Diego Foyo Mejia
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and will be retained by Azteca
Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
§ 2638.303 Notice to prospective employees. Written offers of employment for positions covered by the Standards of Conduct must include the information required in this section to provide prospective employees with notice of the ethical obligations associated with the positions. ( a ) Content. The written offer must include, in either the body of the offer or an attachment: ( 1 ) A statement regarding the agency's commitment to government ethics;
( 2 ) Notice that the individual will be subject to the Standards of Conduct and the criminal conflict of interest statutes as an employee;
( 3 ) Contact information for an appropriate agency ethics office or an explanation of how to obtain additional information on applicable ethics requirements;
( 4 ) Where applicable, notice of the time frame for completing initial ethics training; and
( 5 ) Where applicable, a statement regarding financial disclosure requirements and an explanation that new entrant reports must be filed within 30 days of appointment.
( b ) *DAEO's authority.* At the election of the DAEO, the DAEO may specify the language that the agency will use in the notice required under paragraph (a) of this section or may approve, disapprove, or revise language drafted by other agency officials.
( c ) *Tracking.* Each agency must establish written procedures, which the DAEO must review each year, for issuing the notice required in this section. In the case of an agency with 1,000 or more employees, the DAEO must review any submissions under § 2638.310 each year to confirm that the agency has implemented an appropriate process for meeting the requirements of this section.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44826, 333-58020, 333-118614, 333-135396 and 333-161132) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2000Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1988 Stock Option Plan and certain Non-Plan Stock Option Agreements with Telik, Inc. and the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-108031, 333-114366 and333-89596) and in the related Prospectuses and Prospectus Supplements, of our reports dated March 1, 2010, with respect to the financial statements of Telik, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Telik,Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Palo Alto, California 

March 1, 2010