alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 534.509 Preservation of an established rate of basic pay. ( a ) An SL or ST employee whose rate of basic pay is higher than the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule may not suffer a reduction in pay as a result of transfer to an SL or ST position in another agency where the maximum rate of basic pay for the applicable SL or ST rate range is equal to the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule.
( b ) An SL or ST employee whose rate of basic pay is higher than the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule may not suffer a reduction in pay because his or her agency's applicable performance appraisal system certification expires or is suspended under § 430.405(h) of this chapter. See § 530.203(g) and (h) of this chapter for treatment of the aggregate pay limit when certification status changes during the calendar year.
( c ) An agency may continue an SL or ST employee's rate of basic pay above the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule upon that employee's movement within the agency to an SL or ST position that is not under a certified performance appraisal system. Pay may be reduced upon the movement only as provided in § 534.508.
( d ) If an agency grants a temporary pay increase under conditions described in § 534.508(d) to an SL or ST employee subject to a certified performance appraisal system who, prior to the temporary pay increase, has a rate of basic pay above the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule, the agency may return the employee to an SL or ST position that is not subject to a certified performance appraisal system when the temporary assignment ends and set the SL or ST employee's rate of basic pay at the rate in effect immediately before the temporary pay increase.
( e ) When a rate of basic pay that is higher than the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule is preserved under a provision of this section, the SL or ST employee will continue to receive his or her current rate of basic pay and is not eligible for a pay increase until he or she is assigned to an SL or ST position covered by a certified performance appraisal system or his or her rate of basic pay is less than the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule.
( f ) An agency that is otherwise subject to the limitation in § 534.504(a)(2)(i) with respect to an SL or ST position occupied by an SL or ST employee whose rate of basic pay is authorized to be preserved under paragraph (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this section may set that employee's rate of basic pay above EX-III only at the level required to preserve the applicable rate.
( g ) Preservation of a rate of basic pay under this section does not preclude a subsequent reduction in pay as provided in § 534.508.
( h ) The provisions of this section do not apply upon the appointment of a senior professional employee to a position in the Senior Executive Service or upon the appointment of a member of the Senior Executive Service to a senior professional position.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as createdby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officerof Conceptus, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the threemonths ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 10, 2006 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
|                    | /s/ Gregory E. Lichtwardt |   |
|                    | Gregory E. Lichtwardt |
|                    | Executive Vice President, Treasurer and  Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
### §10304. Regulations

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General may promulgate reasonable and necessary regulations to implement this part.

#### (b) Sliding scale

Notwithstanding section 10303(b) of this title, the Attorney General shall issue regulations regarding the use of a sliding scale based on financial need to ensure that an eligible person who is in financial need receives priority in receiving funds under this part.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1214, as added Pub. L. 104–238, §2(2), Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3115; amended Pub. L. 105–390, §2(4), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3495; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title X, §1086(b)(1)(G), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1968.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796d–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–239 substituted "person" for "dependent".

1998—Pub. L. 105–390 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2013 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–239 effective Jan. 2, 2013, and applicable to matters pending on Jan. 2, 2013, or filed or accruing after that date, with certain exceptions, see section 1086(d) of Pub. L. 112–239, set out as a note under section 10251 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6652

JOHN EDWARD HAMMOND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON,

State of South Carolina Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-99-779-3-8BC)

Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edward Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eugene Bogan, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The magistrate judge relied on our interpretation of 28

U.S.C.A. § 2254(d)(1) (West Supp. 2000), announced in Green

v. French, 143 F.3d 865 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S.

1090 (1999), to deny Hammond relief. The Supreme Court recently

overruled that aspect of Green, however, in Williams v. Taylor, 120

S. Ct. 1495 (2000). We have reviewed Hammond’s appeal in light of

Williams and conclude that the state habeas corpus court’s decision

was not “‘contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of,

clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme

Court.’” Williams, 120 S. Ct. at 1517 (quoting § 2254(d)(1)).

2

PER CURIAM:

John E. Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the

reasoning of the district court.* See Hammond v. South Carolina,

No. CA-99-779-3-8BC (D.S.C. Apr. 14, 2000. We deny Hammond’s

motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Georgia Southwestern Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

regarding the status of the Georgia Southwestern Railroad Co.,

(GSWR) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C.

§231 et sea.) (RRA) and Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. §351 et sea. ) (RUIA) . GSWR has not previously been

determined to be an employer under the RRA and the RUIA.

Information about GSWR was furnished by Ms. Julie Herbert, Tax

Manager of RailTex, Inc., the parent company of GSWR. GSWR

operates rail lines from White Oak to Smithville, Georgia, from

Columbus to Brainbridge, Georgia, from Rochelle, Georgia to Mahrt,

Alabama and Dawson to Albany, Georgia. There are 15.2 miles of

track in Alabama and 341.6 miles in Georgia. According to

information provided by Ms. Herbert, GSWR began operations on

July 17, 1995, and has 29 employees who were first compensated from

that date. Ms. Herbert stated that the line in question

interchanges with Norfolk Southern and CSX Transportation.

Section 1(a)(1) of the RRA defines the term "employer" to include:

(i) any express company, sleeping car

company, and carrier by railroad, subject to

subchapter I of chapter 105 of Title 49;

(ii) any company which is directly or

indirectly owned or controlled by, or under

common control with one or more employers as

defined in paragraph (i) of this subdivision,

and which operates any equipment or facility

or performs any service (except trucking

service, casual service, and the casual

operation of equipment or facilities) in

connection with the transportation of

passengers or property by railroad, or the

receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in

transit, refrigeration or icing, storage, or

handling of property transported by railroad

* * *. [45 U.S.C. §231(a)(1)(i) and (ii)].

Section 1(a) of the RUIA (45 U.S.C. § 351(a)) contains essentially

the same definition.

The evidence establishes that GSWR is a carrier subject to the

Interstate Commerce Act. Accordingly, it is determined that the

BCD 1995-96 BA # 5560
-2-

Georgia Southwestern Railroad Company

Georgia Southwestern Railroad Co. became a rail carrier employer

under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Acts effective July 17, 1995, the date on which it first

compensated employees.

Glen L. Bower

V. M. 6peakman, Jry'
# L_2017161EN.01008301.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/83

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 290/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1079]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1365 of 30 April 2015 on the transmission format for research and development expenditure data (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1365 of 30 April 2015 on the transmission format for research and development expenditure data (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 19za (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 724/2014) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘19zb. | 32015 R 1365: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1365 of 30 April 2015 on the transmission format for research and development expenditure data (OJ L 211, 8.8.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘19zb.

Article 2

The texts of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1365 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 211, 8.8.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1569-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1569-DR), dated October 7, 2004, and related determinations.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 28, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.                              ( print page 64580)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 7, 2004: Martin County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-24708 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
IB 

Union Calendar No. 138

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1985

[Report No. 108–247] 

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage 

amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located 

in high-cost areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself and Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Additional sponsors: Ms. ESHOO and Ms. WATERS

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 6, 2003] 

A BILL

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the maximum mortgage amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located in high-cost areas.
2

•HR 1985 RH 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Multifamily Loan 

5 Limit Adjustment Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MAXIMUM MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMIT FOR MULTI7 FAMILY HOUSING IN HIGH-COST AREAS. 

8 In the National Housing Act, sections 207(c)(3), 

9 213(b)(2)(B)(i), 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 

10 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), and 234(e)(3)(B) (12 

11 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i), 

12 1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(II), 1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 

13 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B)), and 1715y(e)(3)(B)) 

14 are each amended—

15 (1) by striking ‘‘110 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘170 

16 percent’’; and 

17 (2) by striking ‘‘140 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘170 

18 percent’’. 

19 SEC. 3. CATCH-UP ADJUSTMENTS TO CERTAIN MAXIMUM 

20 MORTGAGE AMOUNT LIMITS. 

21 (a) SECTION 207 LIMITS.—Section 207(c)(3) of the 

22 National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3)) is amended 

23 by striking ‘‘$11,250’’ and inserting ‘‘$17,460’’. 
3

•HR 1985 RH 

1 (b) SECTION 213 LIMITS.—Section 213(b)(2)(A) of the 

2 National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715e(b)(2)(A)) is 

3 amended—

4 (1) by striking ‘‘$38,025’’, ‘‘$42,120’’, ‘‘$50,310’’, 

5 ‘‘$62,010’’, and ‘‘$70,200’’ and inserting ‘‘$41,207’’, 

6 ‘‘$47,511’’, ‘‘$57,300’’, ‘‘$73,343’’, and ‘‘$81,708’’, re7 spectively; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘$49,140’’, ‘‘$60,255’’, ‘‘$75,465’’, 

9 and ‘‘$85,328’’ and inserting ‘‘$49,710’’, ‘‘$60,446’’, 

10 ‘‘$78,197’’, and ‘‘$85,836’’, respectively. 
Union Calendar No. 138

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1985

[Report No. 108–247] 

A BILL

To amend the National Housing Act to increase the 

maximum mortgage amount limit for FHA-insured mortgages for multifamily housing located in high-cost areas. 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2003

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 

and ordered to be printed
#### §§ 2416.131-2416.139 [Reserved]
### §10409. Assessment reports

#### (a) Reports to Attorney General

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (4), for each fiscal year for which a grant or subgrant is awarded under this subchapter, each State or specially qualified unit of local government that receives such a grant shall submit to the Attorney General a grant report, and each unit of local government that receives such a subgrant shall submit to the State a subgrant report, at such time and in such manner as the Attorney General may reasonably require.

#### (2) Grant report

Each grant report required by paragraph (1) shall include—

(A) a summary of the activities carried out with such grant;

(B) if such activities included any subgrant, a summary of the activities carried out with each such subgrant; and

(C) an assessment of the effectiveness of such activities on achieving the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (3) Subgrant report

Each subgrant report required by paragraph (1) shall include—

(A) a summary of the activities carried out with such subgrant; and

(B) an assessment of the effectiveness of such activities on achieving the purposes of this subchapter.

#### (4) Waivers

The Attorney General may waive the requirement of an assessment in paragraph (2)(C) for a State or specially qualified unit of local government, or in paragraph (3)(B) for a unit of local government, if the Attorney General determines that—

(A) the nature of the activities are such that assessing their effectiveness would not be practical or insightful;

(B) the amount of the grant or subgrant is such that carrying out the assessment would not be an effective use of those amounts; or

(C) the resources available to the State or unit are such that carrying out the assessment would pose a financial hardship on the State or unit.

#### (b) Reports to Congress

Not later than 120 days after the last day of each fiscal year for which 1 or more grants are awarded under this subchapter, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report, which shall include—

(1) a summary of the information provided under subsection (a);

(2) an assessment by the Attorney General of the grant program carried out under this subchapter; and

(3) such other information as the Attorney General considers appropriate.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1808, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12102(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1867.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ee–8 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000561 21-JUN-2017 08:30 AM
# ill 

# ijill

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 

### 2024 KW 0444 DE'ONDRIC CLARKS 

### MAY 20, 2024 In Re: De' Ondric Clarks, applying 

## for supervisorywrits, 16th

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Mary, No. 17- 

### 199380. BEFORE: WELCH, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. 

## The requestforstay is denied. JEW WIL EW



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT N - 

# A EPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday October 7, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-24654 Filed 9-21-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
-79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

38.0 38.5 39.0 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/09 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8057

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee,

v. OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cr-00112-UA-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Okang Kareem Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Okang Kareem Rochelle seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting his request for new counsel, and the court’s finding that he is competent to stand trial. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Rochelle seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED