75–312 PS

Calendar No. 169

107TH CONGRESS REPORT

1st Session " ! SENATE 107–68

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATION BILL, 2002

SEPTEMBER 25, 2001.—Ordered to be printed

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, from the Committee on Appropriations,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany S. 1460]

The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1460) making appropriations for military construction, family housing, and

base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 2002, and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and recommends that the bill do pass.

Total of bill as reported to Senate ........................... $10,500,000,000

Amount of 2002 budget estimate ............................ 9,971,312,000

Amount of 2001 appropriations ............................... 8,936,498,000

The bill as reported to the Senate:

Over the budget estimate, 2002 ....................... 528,688,000

Over appropriations for fiscal year 2001 ......... 1,563,502,000
(2)

CONTENTS

Page

Background:

Purpose of the bill ............................................................................................ 3

Comparative statement .................................................................................... 3

Compliance with section 308 of the Budget Control Act ............................... 9

Committee recommendation ................................................................................... 9

Items of special interest .......................................................................................... 10

Military construction, Army .................................................................................... 16

Military construction, Navy .................................................................................... 17

Military construction, Air Force ............................................................................. 18

Military construction, Defense-wide ....................................................................... 19

Military construction, Reserve components ........................................................... 24

NATO Security Investment Program ..................................................................... 27

Family housing overview ........................................................................................ 27

Family housing, Army ............................................................................................. 27

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps .............................................................. 28

Family housing, Air Force ....................................................................................... 30

Family housing, Defense-wide ................................................................................ 31

Family housing improvement fund ........................................................................ 31

Homeowners assistance fund, Defense .................................................................. 31

Base realignment and closure account, part IV .................................................... 32

General provisions ................................................................................................... 35

Compliance with paragraph 7, rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate ... 36

Compliance with paragraph 12, rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the

Senate ................................................................................................................... 36

Project listing by location ........................................................................................ 37
(3)

BACKGROUND

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The Military Construction appropriation bill provides necessary

funding for the planning, design, construction, alteration, and improvement of military facilities worldwide, both for Active and Reserve Forces. It also finances the construction, alteration, improvement, operation, and maintenance of military family housing, including payments against past housing mortgage indebtedness.

Certain types of community impact assistance may be provided, as

well as assistance to members of the military who face loss on the

sale of private residences due to installation realignments and closures. The bill is also the source for the U.S. share of the NATO

Security Investment Program. In addition, the bill provides funding

to implement base closures and realignments authorized by law.

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT

The Committee recommends appropriations totaling $10,500,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 military construction, family

housing, and base closure. The following table displays the Committee recommendation in comparison with the current fiscal year,

and the President’s fiscal year 2002 request.
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY

[In thousands of dollars]

Item 2001 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation

Increase (∂) or decrease 

pared with—

2001 enacted Budg

Military construction, Army ...................................................................................................................... 907,878 1,760,541 1,668,957 ∂761,079 

Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥635 ............................... ............................... ∂635 .........

Rescission ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... ¥26,400 ¥26,400 

Miscellaneous appropriations (Public Law 106–554) .................................................................... 26,941 ............................... ............................... ¥26,941 .........

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 9,144 ............................... ............................... ¥9,144 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 943,328 1,760,541 1,642,557 ∂699,229 

Military construction, Navy ...................................................................................................................... 929,113 1,071,408 1,148,633 ∂219,520 

Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥2,889 ............................... ¥19,588 ¥16,699 Rescission ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .........

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 3,187 ............................... ............................... ¥3,187 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 929,411 1,071,408 1,129,045 ∂199,634 

Military construction, Air Force ................................................................................................................ 868,294 1,068,250 1,148,269 ∂279,975 

Rescission ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... ¥4,000 ¥4,000 

Miscellaneous appropriations (Public Law 106–554) .................................................................... 11,974 ............................... ............................... ¥11,974 .........

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 5,065 ............................... ............................... ¥5,065 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 885,333 1,068,250 1,144,269 ∂258,936 

Military construction, Defense-wide ......................................................................................................... 819,954 694,558 881,058 ∂61,104 

Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥7,115 ............................... ............................... ∂7,115 .........

Rescissions ...................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... ¥69,280 ¥69,280 

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... ¥14,376 ............................... ............................... ∂14,376 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 798,463 694,558 811,778 ∂13,315 Total, Active components ........................................................................................................... 3,556,535 4,594,757 4,727,649 ∂1,171,114 

Military construction, Army National Guard ............................................................................................ 281,097 267,389 378,549 ∂97,452 

Miscellaneous appropriations (Public Law 106–554) .................................................................... 4,490 ............................... ............................... ¥4,490 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 285,587 267,389 378,549 ∂92,962 
Military construction, Air National Guard ................................................................................................ 203,381 149,072 222,767 ∂19,386 

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 6,700 ............................... ............................... ¥6,700 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 210,081 149,072 222,767 ∂12,686 

Military construction, Army Reserve ........................................................................................................ 108,499 111,404 111,404 ∂2,905 .........

Military construction, Naval Reserve ....................................................................................................... 64,331 33,641 33,641 ¥30,690 .........

Rescission ....................................................................................................................................... ¥2,400 ............................... ¥925 ∂1,475 

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 61,931 33,641 32,716 ¥29,215 

Military construction, Air Force Reserve .................................................................................................. 36,510 53,732 53,732 ∂17,222 .........

Total, Reserve components ......................................................................................................... 702,608 615,238 799,168 ∂96,560 Total, Military construction ......................................................................................................... 4,259,143 5,209,995 5,526,817 ∂1,267,674 

Appropriations .................................................................................................................... (4,261,543) (5,209,995) (5,627,422) (∂1,365,879) 

Rescissions ........................................................................................................................ (¥2,400) ............................... (¥100,605) (¥98,205) 

NATO Security Investment Program ......................................................................................................... 171,622 162,600 162,600 ¥9,022 .........Family housing, Army:

New construction ............................................................................................................................. 165,459 59,200 80,400 ¥85,059 Construction improvements ............................................................................................................ 63,450 220,750 220,750 ∂157,300 .........

Planning and design ....................................................................................................................... 6,528 11,592 11,592 ∂5,064 .........

Subtotal, construction ................................................................................................................ 235,437 291,542 312,742 ∂77,305 

Operation and maintenance ........................................................................................................... 969,566 1,108,991 1,108,991 ∂139,425 .........

Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥19,911 ............................... ............................... ∂19,911 .........

Subtotal, operation and maintenance ........................................................................................ 949,655 1,108,991 1,108,991 ∂159,336 .........

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 26,480 ............................... ............................... ¥26,480 .........

Total, Family housing, Army ....................................................................................................... 1,211,572 1,400,533 1,421,733 ∂210,161 

Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps:

New construction ............................................................................................................................. 204,669 114,847 123,047 ¥81,622 

Construction improvements ............................................................................................................ 192,652 183,054 183,054 ¥9,598 .........

Planning and design ....................................................................................................................... 19,914 6,499 6,499 ¥13,415 .........

Subtotal, construction ................................................................................................................ 417,235 304,400 312,600 ¥104,635 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Item 2001 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation

Increase (∂) or decrease 

pared with—

2001 enacted Budg

Operation and maintenance ........................................................................................................... 880,696 918,095 918,095 ∂37,399 .........Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥1,071 ............................... ............................... ∂1,071 .........

Subtotal, operation and maintenance ........................................................................................ 879,625 918,095 918,095 ∂38,470 .........

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 20,300 ............................... ............................... ¥20,300 .........

Total, Family housing, Navy and Marine Corps ......................................................................... 1,317,160 1,222,495 1,230,695 ¥86,465 

Family housing, Air Force:

New construction ............................................................................................................................. 71,857 140,800 150,800 ∂78,943 

Construction improvements ............................................................................................................ 173,663 352,879 375,345 ∂201,682 Planning and design ....................................................................................................................... 12,732 24,558 24,558 ∂11,826 .........

Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥6,839 ............................... ............................... ∂6,839 .........

Subtotal, construction ................................................................................................................ 251,413 518,237 550,703 ∂299,290 

Operation and maintenance ........................................................................................................... 824,453 869,121 869,121 ∂44,668 .........Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment ........................................................................................ ¥5,392 ............................... ............................... ∂5,392 .........

Subtotal, operation and maintenance ........................................................................................ 819,061 869,121 869,121 ∂50,060 .........

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 13,625 ............................... ............................... ¥13,625 .........

Total, Family housing, Air Force ................................................................................................. 1,084,099 1,387,358 1,419,824 ∂335,725 

Family housing, Defense-wide:

Construction improvements ............................................................................................................ ............................... 250 250 ∂250 .........

Operation and maintenance ........................................................................................................... 44,787 43,762 43,762 ¥1,025 .........

Total, Family housing, Defense-wide ......................................................................................... 44,787 44,012 44,012 ¥775 .........

Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................... ............................... 2,000 2,000 ∂2,000 .........

Homeowners assistance fund, Defense ................................................................................................... ............................... 10,119 10,119 ∂10,119 .........

(By transfer) .................................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .........
Total, Family housing ................................................................................................................. 3,657,618 4,066,517 4,128,383 ∂470,765 

New construction ............................................................................................................... (441,985) (314,847) (354,247) (¥87,738) Construction improvements ............................................................................................... (429,765) (756,933) (779,399) (∂349,634) 

Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment .......................................................................... (¥6,839) ............................... ............................... (∂6,839) .........

Planning and design ......................................................................................................... (39,174) (42,649) (42,649) (∂3,475) .........

General reduction .............................................................................................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .........

Operation and maintenance .............................................................................................. (2,779,907) (2,939,969) (2,939,969) (∂160,062) .........Foreign currency fluctuation adjustment .......................................................................... (¥26,374) ............................... ............................... (∂26,374) .........

Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................................... ............................... (2,000) (2,000) (∂2,000) .........

Homeowners Assistance Fund ........................................................................................... ............................... (10,119) (10,119) (∂10,119) .........(By transfer) ...................................................................................................................... ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .........

Base realignment and closure accounts:

Part IV ............................................................................................................................................. 1,022,115 532,200 682,200 ¥339,915 

Supplemental appropriations (Public Law 107–20) ....................................................................... 9,000 ............................... ............................... ¥9,000 .........

Total ............................................................................................................................................ 1,031,115 532,200 682,200 ¥348,915 

GENERAL PROVISIONS

General provision (sec. 129) .................................................................................................................... ¥100,000 ............................... ............................... ∂100,000 .........

Foreign currency account (sec. 132) ....................................................................................................... ¥83,000 ............................... ............................... ∂83,000 .........

Grand total:

New budget (obligational) authority ................................................................................. 8,936,498 9,971,312 10,500,000 ∂1,563,502 

Appropriations ........................................................................................................... (8,938,898) (9,971,312) (10,600,605) (∂1,661,707) 

Rescissions ............................................................................................................... (¥2,400) ............................... (¥100,605) (¥98,205) (By transfer) ............................................................................................................. ............................... ............................... ............................... ............................... .........

SUMMARY OF APPROPRIATIONS ACCOUNTS

Military Construction, Army ...................................................................................................................... 943,328 1,760,541 1,642,557 ∂699,229 

Military Construction, Navy ...................................................................................................................... 929,411 1,071,408 1,129,045 ∂199,634 

Military Construction, Air Force ............................................................................................................... 885,333 1,068,250 1,144,269 ∂258,936 Military Construction, Defense-wide ........................................................................................................ 798,463 694,558 811,778 ∂13,315 

Total, Active components ........................................................................................................... 3,556,535 4,594,757 4,727,649 ∂1,171,114 

Military Construction, Army National Guard ............................................................................................ 285,587 267,389 378,549 ∂92,962 

Military Construction, Air National Guard ............................................................................................... 210,081 149,072 222,767 ∂12,686 

Military Construction, Army Reserve ........................................................................................................ 108,499 111,404 111,404 ∂2,905 .........

Military Construction, Naval Reserve ....................................................................................................... 61,931 33,641 32,716 ¥29,215 
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Item 2001 enacted Budget estimate Committee rec- ommendation

Increase (∂) or decrease 

pared with—

2001 enacted Budg

Military Construction, Air Force Reserve .................................................................................................. 36,510 53,732 53,732 ∂17,222 .........

Total, Reserve components ......................................................................................................... 702,608 615,238 799,168 ∂96,560 Total, Military Construction ........................................................................................................ 4,259,143 5,209,995 5,526,817 ∂1,267,674 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program .......................................................... 171,622 162,600 162,600 ¥9,022 .........Family Housing, Army:

Construction .................................................................................................................................... 235,437 291,542 312,742 ∂77,305 

Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 976,135 1,108,991 1,108,991 ∂132,856 .........

Family Housing, Navy and Marine Corps:

Construction .................................................................................................................................... 417,235 304,400 312,600 ¥104,635 

Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 899,925 918,095 918,095 ∂18,170 .........

Family Housing, Air Force:

Construction .................................................................................................................................... 251,413 518,237 550,703 ∂299,290 Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 832,686 869,121 869,121 ∂36,435 .........

Family Housing, Defense-wide:

Construction .................................................................................................................................... ............................... 250 250 ∂250 .........Operation and Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 44,787 43,762 43,762 ¥1,025 .........

Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund ................................................................... ............................... 2,000 2,000 ∂2,000 .........

Homeowners Assistance Fund, Defense ................................................................................................... ............................... 10,119 10,119 ∂10,119 .........

Total, Family Housing ................................................................................................................. 3,657,618 4,066,517 4,128,383 ∂470,765 

Base Realignment and Closure Account ................................................................................................. 1,031,115 532,200 682,200 ¥348,915 

General Provisions .................................................................................................................................... ¥183,000 ............................... ............................... ∂183,000 .........

Grand Total ................................................................................................................................. 8,936,498 9,971,312 10,500,000 ∂1,563,502 
9

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 308 OF THE BUDGET CONTROL ACT

Section 308(a) of the Budget and Impoundment Control Act of

1974 (Public Law 93–344) requires that the Committee include in

its report a comparison of its recommendations with levels contained in the first concurrent resolution. Appropriate data are reflected below:

BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL

PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC.

308(a), PUBLIC LAW 93–344, AS AMENDED

[In millions of dollars]

Budget authority Outlays

Committee

allocation

Amount

of bill

Committee

allocation

Amount

of bill

Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee allocations to its subcommittees of

amounts in the First Concurrent Resolution

for 2002: Subcommittee on Military Construction:

General purpose, defense ............................ 10,500 10,500 NA NA

General purpose, non-defense ..................... .................... .................... NA NA

General purpose, total ................................. 10,500 10,500 9,284 1 9,253

Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:

2002 ............................................................. .................... .................... .................... 2 2,741

2003 ............................................................. .................... .................... .................... 4,026

2004 ............................................................. .................... .................... .................... 2,310

2005 ............................................................. .................... .................... .................... 794

2006 and future years ................................ .................... .................... .................... 598

Financial assistance to State and local governments for 2002 ................................................ NA .................... NA ....................

1 Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

2 Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.

NA: Not applicable.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

The Committee recommends new fiscal year 2002 appropriations

of $10,500,000,000. This is $528,688,000 over the budget request,

and $1,563,502,000 over the appropriations for fiscal year 2001.

The basis for this recommendation is contained in the following

‘‘Items of special interest,’’ and under the discussions pertaining to

each individual appropriation. Complete project detail is provided

in the tables at the end of the report.
(10)

ITEMS OF SPECIAL INTEREST

COMPLIANCE WITH 302(b) ALLOCATION

The Appropriations Committee conformed fully to the budget resolution for defense spending in its 302(b) allocation. This allocation

divided the budget authority and outlays among the subcommittees

with jurisdiction over discretionary spending. In this recommended

bill, the Appropriations Committee has remained within the tight

constraints of its 302(b) allocation for military construction.

HEARINGS

The Subcommittee on Military Construction held hearings on the

fiscal year 2002 budget request during July and August 2001. The

subcommittee heard testimony from representatives of the military

services and defense agencies concerning fiscal year 2002 budget

priorities and base realignment and closure issues.

SUMMARY OF COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

The budget request for fiscal year 2002 reflects an increase of

$1,034,814,000 from the amount enacted in fiscal year 2001.

The Committee recommends an additional $528,688,000 above

the fiscal year 2002 budget request. The total recommended appropriation for fiscal year 2002 is $10,500,000,000, an increase of

$1,563,502,000 from fiscal year 2001 funding.

GENERAL AND FLAG OFFICER QUARTERS

The Committee is concerned about the escalating costs of improving and maintaining general and flag officer quarters. The Committee recognizes that many of these quarters are historic and as

such, require maintenance, preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration beyond the normal Department of Defense standards.

These preservation activities contribute significantly to the annual

cost of maintaining these quarters.

The Committee urges the Department to look for innovative ways

to reduce these expenses while ensuring that projects are consistent with DOD standards and not excessive. While the Department of Defense should preserve these quarters as a historical legacy, the military services should also explore more cost effective

ways of rehabilitating and restoring historic family housing, such

as the use of synthetic building materials where appropriate.

The Committee has again included section 125 which requires

that the Military Construction Appropriations bill be the sole

source of all operation and maintenance for all flag and general officer quarters. Based on the escalating costs of routine repair and

maintenance activities, the Committee recommends that the annual limitation of expenditures for repairs on these quarters be

raised from $25,000 to $35,000 per year.
11

OVERSEAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION

The Committee notes the significant increase in military construction funding allocated for overseas bases in the fiscal year

2002 budget request. In all, the proposed fiscal year 2002 overseas

spending is 14.4 percent of overall specified project spending versus

only 9.9 percent of total spending in fiscal year 2001. The Committee remains concerned about the adequacy of facilities, particularly housing, community, and environmental systems, at U.S. installations overseas. However, the Committee is also concerned

that some senior U.S. commanders, in their efforts to improve inadequate facilities, may be advocating major construction and environmental programs that may lead to large funding commitments

ahead of policy decisions by the Secretary of Defense.

The Committee is aware that the Department of Defense is in

the midst of a comprehensive review of our overseas installations

to ensure that our presence is consistent with the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) and our long-term basing strategy. The Committee directs the Department to submit a report on the Department’s overseas basing master plan to the congressional committees not later than April 1, 2002. The master plan must identify

those enduring installations required to support our national military objectives as well as provide a roadmap for future stationing

decisions. This report must take into account the issue of military

training and the potential for restrictions on proposed training

areas, including encroachment and environmental constraints and

concerns. The Committee’s goal is to ensure that scarce resources

are appropriately allocated in support of our national security objectives and consistent with the Department of Defense’s long

range policies and plans.

CONFORMANCE WITH AUTHORIZATION BILL

The Committee strongly supports the authorization-appropriation

process. However, the Committee has reported the appropriation

bill prior to completion of the authorization process. Therefore, the

Committee has provided construction funds for specific projects

which were included in the Senate-reported version of the National

Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2002 and projects subject

to authorization.

CONTINGENCY FUNDING

The Committee commends the Department and the military services for including contingency funding in the fiscal year 2002 budget request for military construction and family housing projects.

Adequate contingency funding is essential for the efficient and costeffective execution of the overall construction program throughout

the Department of Defense. The Committee strongly urges the Department to include responsible contingency funding in the fiscal

year 2003 budget submission.

REPROGRAMMING RULES/CRITERIA

The following rules apply for all military construction and family

housing reprogrammings. A project or account (including the subelements of an account) which has been specifically reduced by the
12

Congress in acting on the appropriation request is considered to be

a congressional interest item. A prior approval reprogramming is

required for any increase to an item that has specifically reduced

by the Congress. Accordingly, no below threshold reprogrammings

to an item specifically reduced by the Congress are permitted.

The reprogramming criteria that apply to military construction

projects (25 percent of the funded amount or $2,000,000, whichever

is less) continue to apply to new housing construction projects and

to improvements over $2,000,000. To provide the individual services the flexibility to proceed with construction contracts without

disruption or delay, the costs associated with environmental hazard

remediation such as asbestos removal, radon abatement, lead-based

paint removal or abatement, and any other legislated environmental hazard remediation may be excluded, provided that such remediation requirements could not be reasonably anticipated at the

time of budget submission. This exclusion applies to projects authorized in the budget year, and also projects authorized in prior

years for which construction contracts have not been completed.

Furthermore, in instances where a prior approval reprogramming request for a project or account has been approved by the

Committee, the amount approved becomes the new base for any future increase or decrease via below threshold reprogrammings (provided that the project or account is not a congressional interest

item).

TRANSFER AUTHORITY

The budget request proposed a general provision which would

allow the transfer of up to $67,000,000 between any accounts in the

bill, and this could be accomplished at the determination of the

Secretary of Defense and upon the approval of OMB. Congress

would be given an ‘‘after the fact’’ notification. The Committee believes that the existing reprogramming procedures are sufficient in

solving urgent, high priority funding problems within available resources and denies this request.

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

The Committee has included $682,200,000 for the ‘‘Base realignment and closure’’ account, an increase of $150,000,000 over the

budget request. This additional funding is needed to address urgent, unfunded environmental remediation requirements at bases

that have been closed or realigned.

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION

The fiscal year 2002 budget request includes $1,218,435,000 to

construct or modernize 60 barracks projects.

The Committee recommends $1,246,373,000 for barracks construction projects in fiscal year 2002, an increase of $27,938,000

over the budget request. This additional funding is provided to help

reduce the unaccompanied housing deficit and modernize existing

barracks.
13

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

Location Request Recommended

Army:

Alaska: Fort Richardson Barracks Complex (144 spaces) ........................... $45,000,000 $45,000,000

Colorado: Fort Carson Barracks Complex (336 spaces) ............................... 25,000,000 25,000,000

Hawaii:

Schofield Barracks Barracks Complex (400 spaces) .......................... 23,000,000 23,000,000

Wheeler Trng Range Barracks Complex (192 spaces) ........................ 50,000,000 50,000,000

Kentucky: Fort Campbell Barracks Complex (104 spaces) .......................... 47,000,000 47,000,000

Michigan: Augusta/Battle Creek TASS Barracks (336 spaces) .................... .................... 13,318,000

Missouri: Fort Leonard Wood Basic Training Complex (1,200 spaces) ........ 27,000,000 27,000,000

New Jersey: Fort Monmouth Barracks Complex (250 spaces) ...................... 20,000,000 20,000,000

North Carolina:

Fort Bragg Basic Training Complex (352 spaces) .............................. 49,000,000 49,000,000

Fort Bragg Basic Training Complex (228 spaces) .............................. 27,000,000 27,000,000

Fort Bragg Basic Training Complex (330 spaces) .............................. 17,500,000 17,500,000

South Carolina: Fort Jackson Basic Training Complex (1,200 spaces) ....... 26,000,000 26,000,000

Texas: Fort Hood Barracks Complex (480 spaces) ....................................... 41,000,000 41,000,000

Washington: Fort Lewis Barracks Complex (300 spaces) ............................ 48,000,000 48,000,000

Germany:

Bamberg Barracks Complex (282 spaces) .......................................... 20,000,000 20,000,000

Darmstadt Barracks Complex (82 spaces) .......................................... 6,800,000 6,800,000

Darmstadt Barracks Complex (82 spaces) .......................................... 6,700,000 6,700,000

Heidelberg Barracks Complex (89 spaces) .......................................... 6,800,000 6,800,000

Heidelberg Barracks Complex (132 spaces) ........................................ 8,500,000 8,500,000

Hanau Barracks Complex (105 spaces) .............................................. 7,200,000 7,200,000

Korea:

Camp Hovey Barracks Complex (400 spaces) ..................................... 33,000,000 33,000,000

Camp Humphreys Barracks Complex (232 spaces) ............................ 14,500,000 14,500,000

Camp Stanley Barracks Complex (464 spaces) .................................. 28,000,000 28,000,000

Subtotal, Army ................................................................................. 577,000,000 590,318,000

Navy & Marine Corps:

California:

Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (400 spaces) ................ 21,200,000 21,200,000

Camp Pendleton Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (400 spaces) ................ 21,600,000 21,600,000

El Centro Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (320 spaces) ........................... 23,520,000 23,520,000

NAS Lemoore Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (104 spaces) ..................... 10,010,000 10,010,000

NC San Diego Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (516 spaces) .................... 47,240,000 47,240,000

Twentynine Palms Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (384 spaces) ............. 29,675,000 29,675,000

Washington, DC: Anacostia Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (120 spaces) ........ 9,810,000 9,810,000

Florida: Mayport Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (260 spaces) ......................... 16,420,000 16,420,000

Hawaii:

Kaneohe Bay Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (300 spaces) ...................... 24,920,000 24,920,000

NS Pearl Harbor Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (112 spaces) ................ 17,300,000 17,300,000

NS Pearl Harbor Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (312 spaces) ................ 23,300,000 23,300,000

Illinois:

Great Lakes Recruit Barracks (1,056 spaces) .................................... 41,130,000 41,130,000

Great Lakes Recruit Barracks (1,056 spaces) .................................... 41,130,000 41,130,000

Maine:

Kittery-Portsmouth Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (172 spaces) ............. .................... 14,620,000

Brunswick Transient Student Quarters (500 spaces) ......................... 22,630,000 22,630,000

Mississippi: Gulfport Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (180 spaces) .................. 14,300,000 14,300,000

Missouri: Kansas City Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (196 spaces) ................ 9,010,000 9,010,000

North Carolina:

Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (400 spaces) ................... 16,530,000 16,530,000

Camp Lejeune Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (320 spaces) ................... 13,550,000 13,550,000
14

BARRACKS CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS—Continued

Location Request Recommended

Virginia:

NS Norfolk BEQ Modernization (380 spaces) ...................................... 14,730,000 14,730,000

Quantico Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (200 spaces) ............................ 9,390,000 9,390,000

Greece: Larissa Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (152 spaces) ........................... 12,240,000 12,240,000

Guam: Guam BEQ Modernization (64 spaces) ............................................. 9,300,000 9,300,000

Subtotal, Navy & Marine Corps ................................................................ 448,935,000 463,555,000

Air Force:

Alabama:

Maxwell AFB Officer Training School Dormitory (120 spaces) ............ 11,800,000 11,800,000

Maxwell AFB Squadron Officer School Dormitory (162 spaces) .......... 13,600,000 13,600,000

Alaska: Elmendorf AFB Domitory (180 spaces) ............................................ 20,000,000 20,000,000

Arizona: Davis-Monthan AFB Domitory (120 spaces) ................................... 8,700,000 8,700,000

Colorado: Buckley AFB Domitory (144 spaces) ............................................. 11,200,000 11,200,000

Oklahoma: Tinker AFB Domitory (144 spaces) ............................................. 10,200,000 10,200,000

Texas:

Lackland AFB Domitory (96 spaces) .................................................... 8,600,000 8,600,000

Sheppard AFB Student Domitory (140 spaces) ................................... 16,000,000 16,000,000

Sheppard AFB Student Domitory (160 spaces) ................................... 21,000,000 21,000,000

Virginia: Langley AFB Domitory (96 spaces) ................................................ 8,300,000 8,300,000

Germany: Ramstein AFB Domitory (120 spaces) .......................................... 11,000,000 11,000,000

Italy: Aviano AFB Domitory (102 spaces) ..................................................... 8,200,000 8,200,000

Korea:

Osan AFB Domitory (156 spaces) ........................................................ 14,400,000 14,400,000

Osan AFB Domitory (156 spaces) ........................................................ 15,800,000 15,800,000

Osan AFB Officer Domitory (69 spaces) .............................................. 9,700,000 9,700,000

Turkey: Eskisehir Domitory (32 spaces) ........................................................ 4,000,000 4,000,000

Subtotal, Air Force .................................................................................... 192,500,000 192,500,000

REAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENT

The Committee recommends a continuation of the following general rules for repairing a facility under Operations and Maintenance account funding:

Components of the facility may be repaired by replacement, and

such replacement can be up to current standards or code.

Interior arrangements and restorations may be included as repair, but additions, new facilities, and functional conversions must

be performed as military construction projects.

Such projects may be done concurrent with repair projects, as

long as the final conjunctively funded project is a complete and usable facility.

The appropriate Service Secretary shall submit a 21-day notification prior to carrying out any repair project with an estimated cost

in excess of $7,500,000.

The Department is directed to continue to provide the real property maintenance backlog at all installations for which there is a

requested construction project in future budget requests. This information is to be provided on Form 1390. In addition, for all troop

housing requests, the Form 1391 is to continue to show all real

property maintenance conducted in the past 2 years and all future

requirements for unaccompanied housing at that installation.
15

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS

The fiscal year 2002 budget request includes $25,460,000 for 4

child development center projects. The Committee recommends

$33,610,000 for a total of 6 projects.

The following child development center projects are provided for

fiscal year 2002:

Location Request Recommended

Army:

Illinois: Rock Island Arsenal ......................................................................... .................... $3,500,000

Kansas: Fort Riley ......................................................................................... $6,800,000 6,800,000

Maryland: Fort Meade ................................................................................... 5,800,000 5,800,000

Germany: Wiesbaden Air Base ...................................................................... 6,800,000 6,800,000

Navy:

South Carolina: Beaufort Naval Base ........................................................... 6,060,000 6,060,000

Air Force:

Montana: Malmstrom AFB ............................................................................. .................... 4,650,000

Total .......................................................................................................... 25,460,000 33,610,000
(16)

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $943,328,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 1,760,541,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,642,557,000

The Committee recommends $1,642,557,000 for the Army for fiscal year 2002. This is a decrease of $117,984,000 from the budget

request for fiscal year 2002. This also reflects the realignment of

the Chemical Demilitarization Program responsibility from the

Army. (See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.)

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as practical:

Installation Desalinization System, Fort Bliss, TX.—Of the

$153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army’’

account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,800,000 be

made available for the design of this water treatment system.

Replace Instructional Facility, Bell Hall, Fort Leavenworth, KS.—

Of the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the

‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $2,500,000 be made

available for the design of this instructional facility.

Division Command and Control Facility, Fort Campbell, KY.—Of

the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the

‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,500,000 be made

available for the design of this command and control facility.

U.S. Army Heritage and Education Center, Carlisle Barracks,

PA.—Of the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $500,000 be made

available for the planning and design of the center for restoration

and archival of Army documents and audio/visual media.

U.S. Army Museum Support Center, Martinsburg, WV.—Of the

$153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $100,000 be made available to

conduct a study on the feasibility and cost to renovate the Martinsburg Roundhouse Center, to accommodate the U.S. Army indoor

storage facility for macro military artifacts project.

Physical Fitness Center Addition, Fort Wainwright, AK.—Of the

$21,130,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $600,000

be made available for the construction of this physical fitness center addition.

Aircraft Armament Engineering Center, Yuma, AZ.—Of the

$21,130,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,480,000 be made available for the construction of this engineering center.

Launch Complex Quality Assurance Facility, White Sands Missile

Range, NM.—Of the $21,130,000 provided for unspecified minor
17

construction within the ‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $1,050,000 be made available for the construction of

this quality assurance facility.

Anechoic Chamber, White Sands Missile Range, NM.—The Committee recognizes the immediate requirement of the Army Research

Laboratory (Survivability, Lethality and Analysis Division, SLAD)

at White Sands Missile Range to replace the anechoic chamber destroyed by fire in December 2000. The loss of this facility will significantly impede critical research and development in Army Information Operations. The Committee strongly recommends that the

Army expedite replacement of the anechoic chamber at White

Sands Missile Range.

Consolidated Logistics Maintenance Complex, Fort Sill, OK.—Of

the $153,084,000 provided for planning and design within the

‘‘Army’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,300,000 be made

available for the design of this logistics maintenance complex.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, NAVY

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $929,411,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 1,071,408,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,129,045,000

The Committee recommends $1,129,045,000 for Navy and Marine

Corps military construction for fiscal year 2002. This amount is an

increase of $57,637,000 from the fiscal year 2002 budget request.

(See State tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.)

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as practical:

Chapel, Kaneohe Bay Marine Corps Base, HI.—Of the

$37,332,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $510,000 be

made available for the design of this chapel.

Renovate Joint Interoperability Test Command, Indian Head,

Naval Surface Warfare Center, MD.—Of the $37,332,000 provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee

directs that not less than $300,000 be made available for the design of this facility.

Aircraft Prototype Facility, Patuxent River, MD.—Of the

$37,332,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,450,000 be

made available for the design of this prototype facility.

National Security Research Center, Newport Naval War College,

RI.—Of the $37,332,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,790,000 be made available for the design of this research center.

Electronic Integration and Support Facility, Charleston Naval

Weapons Station, SC.—Of the $37,332,000 provided for planning

and design within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $650,000 be made available for the design of this support facility.

Turner Field House, U.S. Naval Academy, MD.—Of the

$37,332,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that $2,700,000 be made available

for the design of this facility.
18

Fitness Center, Albany, Marine Corps Logistics Base, GA.—Of the

$13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $900,000

be made available for the construction of this fitness center.

Infrastructure System Upgrade, Corpus Christi Naval Air Station, TX.—Of the $13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $786,000 be made available for the construction of

these electrical, air conditioning and water facilities upgrades.

Repair Taxiway, Field Waldron, TX.—Of the $13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Navy’’ account,

the Committee directs that not less than $520,000 be made available for the construction repair of this taxiway.

Repair Runway and Perimeter Fence, Cabaniss, TX.—Of the

$13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $369,000

be made available for the construction repair of this runway and

fence.

Compartmented Intelligence Facility, Joint Readiness Base, Fort

Worth, TX.—Of the $13,321,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Navy’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $200,000 be made available for the construction of

this facility.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $885,333,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 1,068,250,000

Committee recommendation (including rescission) ............................. 1,144,269,000

The Committee recommends $1,144,269,000 for the Air Force in

fiscal year 2002. This is an increase of $76,019,000 to the fiscal

year 2002 budget request. (See State tables at the end of the report

for complete program recommendations.)

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as practical:

Convert Facilities to Avionics Shop, Elmendorf Air Force Base,

AK.—Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$540,000 be made available for the design of this conversion.

Blair Lake Vehicle Maintenance Facility, Eielson Air Force Base,

AK.—Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$300,000 be made available for the design of this vehicle maintenance facility.

Corrosion Paint/De-Paint Facility, Robins Air Force Base, GA.—

Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design within the

‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,250,000 be made available for the design of this corrosion facility.

Fire/Crash Rescue Station, Seymour Johnson Air Force Base,

NC.—Of the $83,420,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$490,000 be made available for the design of this fire/crash rescue

station.
19

Ramp Extension, Minot AFB, ND.—Of the $83,420,000 provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Air Force’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,710,000 be made available for the planning

and design of this ramp extension. The shortage of parking space

on the main parking apron at Minot AFB degrades the readiness

of the 5th Bomb Wing to meet mission requirements and is a significant force protection deficiency. The Committee urges the Air

Force to complete all remaining design work as quickly as possible

and to fully fund this project in the President’s fiscal year 2003

budget.

Biomedical Training Facility—Brooks AFB, TX.—Of the

$12,250,000 provided for unspecified minor construction in the ‘‘Air

Force’’ account, the Committee directs that $1,000,000 be made

available for the construction of this facility.

Masirah Island Airfield, Oman.—The Committee recommendation includes $8,000,000 in the ‘‘Air Force’’ major construction account to complete planning and design and construction of the

Masirah Island Airfield project in Oman. The Committee recommendation rescinds $4,000,000 from previously appropriated Air

Force funds, and $4,000,000 from previously appropriated DefenseWide funds and reappropriates those funds in this Act to complete

the Masirah Island project, which was originally authorized and

funded in Public Law 107–20.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $798,463,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 694,558,000

Committee recommendation (including rescissions) ........................... 811,778,000

The Committee recommends $811,778,000 for projects considered

within the ‘‘Defense-wide’’ account. The amount recommended is an

increase of $117,220,000 from the fiscal year 2002 budget request.

This increase reflects the realignment of the Chemical Demilitarization Program responsibility to this appropriation. (See State

tables at the end of the report for complete program recommendations.)

PENTAGON RECONSTRUCTION

The Committee fully supports the Department of Defense efforts

to rebuild the Pentagon from the recent terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The Committee is committed to working with the

Department to ensure the necessary resources are available for reconstructing the Pentagon and improving the anti-terrorism and

force protection measures of the facility. The Congress recently provided $40,000,000,000 of emergency spending authority to the administration, of which a portion will be directed towards the Pentagon reconstruction. The Committee believes that the funding to

rebuild the destroyed wedge of the Pentagon should be funded

through traditional military construction appropriations, specifically ‘‘Military Construction, Defense-wide’’. The Committee directs

the Department to report to the congressional defense committees

on the overall status of the reconstruction plan, acquisition strategy, project time line, and cost estimates no later than November

1, 2001.
20

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION

The budget request identified a requirement of $172,500,000 for

the construction of the following chemical weapon demilitarization

facilities in fiscal year 2002. The Committee recommends a total of

$172,500,000 for this program as requested by the President.

State/installation/project Request Recommended

Arkansas: Pine Bluff Arsenal, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph 6 .......... $26,000,000 $26,000,000

Colorado: Pueblo Depot, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph 3 ................... 11,000,000 11,000,000

Indiana: Newport Army Ammunition Plant, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility,

Ph 4 ................................................................................................................... 66,000,000 66,000,000

Kentucky: Bluegrass Army Depot, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph 2 .... 3,000,000 3,000,000

Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Ground, Ammunition Demilitarization Facility, Ph

4 ......................................................................................................................... 66,500,000 66,500,000

Total .......................................................................................................... 172,500,000 172,500,000

The budget request proposes that these amounts should be appropriated under the ‘‘Military Construction, Army’’ account. As in

prior years, the Committee recommends that these amounts be appropriated under the ‘‘Military Construction, Defense-wide’’ account, in order to facilitate the tracking of expenses for the Chemical Demilitarization Program, and to avoid distorting the size of

the Army’s military construction program.

The Committee believes that the focus on this program must remain at the Office of the Secretary of the Defense rather than at

the service level and directs the Department to submit the fiscal

year 2003 budget accordingly.

The following chart displays the scope of the military construction investment in the overall chemical demilitarization program:

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS

[In millions of dollars]

2000

and

prior

Fiscal year—

Total

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Tooele ............................... 198.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 198.0

Anniston ........................... 181.2 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 181.2

Umatilla Depot ................. 11.2 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 11.2

Umatilla Facility .............. 182.2 9.4 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 191.6

Pine Fixed Facility ............ ............ ............ ............ 2.0 7.7 0.8 ............ 10.5

Pine Bluff Depot .............. 10.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 10.0

Pine Bluff Facility ............ 107.8 43.6 25.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ 176.4

Pueblo Depot .................... 6.3 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 6.3

Pueblo Facility ................. ............ 10.7 13.0 35.3 71.0 28.8 ............ 158.8

Blue Grass Depot ............ 2.0 8.5 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 10.5

Blue Grass Facility .......... ............ ............ 3.0 10.0 ............ 36.0 62.0 111.0

Aberdeen CTDF ................. 16.1 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 16.1

Aberdeen Depot ................ 1.9 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 1.9

Aberdeen Facility ............. 80.0 45.7 66.5 30.4 ............ ............ ............ 221.7

Newport Depot ................. 2.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 2.0

Newport Facility ............... 47.4 34.4 65.0 13.2 ............ ............ ............ 160.0

MAPS Facility ................... ............ 3.1 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 3.1

Planning and Design ....... 114.5 ............ 1.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ 115.5
21

CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION PROGRAM MILITARY CONSTRUCTION COSTS—Continued

[In millions of dollars]

2000

and

prior

Fiscal year—

Total

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Total ................... 960.6 155.4 172.5 90.9 78.7 65.6 62.0 1,585.8

MEDICAL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM

The fiscal year 2002 budget request included $225,126,000 for 22

projects plus planning and design and unspecified minor construction to provide hospital and medical facilities, including treatment,

training, and medical research and development facilities. The

Committee recommends a total of $229,126,000 for Department of

Defense medical projects.

The following hospital and medical projects are recommended for

fiscal year 2002:

Location/project title Request Recommended

Alaska: Ft. Wainwright, Hospital Replacement ............................................. $18,500,000 $18,500,000

California:

Camp Pendleton, Fleet Hospital Support Facilities .............................. 3,150,000 3,150,000

Camp Pendleton, Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement, Horno, ............. 4,300,000 4,300,000

Camp Pendleton, Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement, Las Flores ...... 3,800,000 3,800,000

Camp Pendleton, Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement, Las Pulgas ..... 4,050,000 4,050,000

Twentynine Palms, LDRP Conversion .................................................... 1,600,000 1,600,000

Colorado: Shriever Air Force Base, Medical/Dental Clinic ............................. 4,000,000 4,000,000

Florida:

Hurlburt Field, Clinic Addition/Alteration .............................................. 8,800,000 8,800,000

Mayport Naval Station, Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement ................ 24,000,000 24,000,000

Georgia:

Albany Marine Corps Logistics Base, Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement .................................................................................................. 5,800,000 5,800,000

Fort Stewart, Consolidated Troop Medical Clinic ................................. 11,000,000 11,000,000

Maryland:

Andrews Air Force Base, Medical Clinic Addition/Alteration ................ 7,300,000 7,300,000

Andrews Air Force Base, Branch Medical/Dental Clinic Replacement .................................................................................................. 2,950,000 2,950,000

New Mexico: Holloman Air Force Base, Medical Clinic Alteration ................. 5,700,000 5,700,000

Texas:

Dyess Air Force Base, Medical Treatment Facility Alteration ............... 3,300,000 3,300,000

Fort Hood, Hospital Addition/Alteration ................................................ 12,200,000 12,200,000

Virginia: Norfolk, Branch Medical Clinic Addition/Alteration ........................ 21,000,000 21,000,000

Washington: Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, Water Survival Facility ...... 6,600,000 6,600,000

Wyoming: F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Medical Clinic Alteration .................. 2,700,000 2,700,000

Portugal: Lajes Field, Dental Clinic Replacement ......................................... 3,750,000 3,750,000

Germany: Thule Air Force Base, Composite Medical Facility Replacement .. 28,000,000 28,000,000

Greenland: Heidelberg, Hospital Addition/Clinic Alteration ........................... 10,800,000 10,800,000

Total .................................................................................................. 193,300,000 193,300,000

Ambulatory Clinic, Goose Creek, SC.—Of the $30,300,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Defense-wide Tricare

Management Activity’’ account, the Committee directs that not less

than $4,000,000 be made available for the design of this clinic.
22

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP).—The Committee is

aware of the long standing need for expanded and improved facilities for the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) as reported

to Congress in the AFIP Facility Improvement Plan in accordance

with direction in the fiscal year 2000 National Defense Authorization Act. However, the Committee is concerned over the projected

cost estimates to renovate and expand the existing facility at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Therefore, the Committee directs

the Department of Defense to undertake an assessment of alternate locations in lower cost regions within the Mid-Atlantic area.

In conducting its assessment, the Department is instructed to take

into account regional facilities that could provide research, medical,

DNA analysis, forensic, and biometric support to the Institute.

DEFENSE AGENCIES

Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) Test, Evaluation, and Acquisition Support Center (MASINT/TEA), Huntsville,

AL.—Of the $16,516,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Defense-wide Defense Intelligence Agency’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $4,000,000 be made available for

the completion of concept development, cost estimation, and design

of this support center.

Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) Tasking,

Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination (MASINT/TPED) Center, Martinsburg, WV.—Of the $16,516,000 provided for planning

and design within the ‘‘Defense-wide Defense Intelligence Agency’’

account, the Committee directs that not less than $6,000,000 be

made available for the completion of concept development, cost estimation, and design of this tasking, processing, exploitation, and

dissemination center.

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION

The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Secretary of Defense ‘‘Contingency construction’’ account in accordance with the

budget request. This account provides funds which may be used by

the Secretary of Defense for unforeseen facility requirements. The

Committee believes that the funding provided to the account is

adequate to meet the needs of the Department.

RESCISSIONS

National Missile Defense.—Division A of Public Law 106–246

provided funding for ‘‘National Missile Defense, Initial Deployment

Facilities, Phase 1.’’ The administration has determined that currently planned National Missile Defense construction programs

should be funded through the Defense Appropriations research,

test, development, and evaluation account instead of through the

Military Construction Appropriations bill. Consequently, the

$55,030,000 balance remaining in the National Missile Defense

Military Construction account is no longer required for the project

for which it was appropriated. The Committee therefore rescinds

$55,030,000 from the ‘‘Military Construction, Defense-wide’’ account.
23

Aruba-Forward Operating Locations.—Division B of Public Law

106–246 provided funding for a Forward Operating Location at

Aruba. This project is no longer required. Therefore, the Committee

rescinds $10,250,000 from the ‘‘Military Construction, Defensewide’’ account.

ENERGY CONSERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

The Committee recommends the full budget request of $35,600,000 for the Energy Conservation and Improvement Project

(ECIP). Last winter’s energy shortages, coupled with heightened

national security concerns over the vulnerability of the existing

power delivery system, transmission lines, and fuel supply sources,

have underscored the need for the Department to increase its reliance on renewable energy resources, particularly solar, wind, and

geothermal, at military installations and Department of Defense

family housing complexes. It is the opinion of the Committee that

renewable energy resources can help to improve energy reliability,

independence, and security through diversification and distributed

development, and in so doing, complement conventional energy resources.

To accomplish this goal, the Committee directs the Department

to designate an executive agent among the services with field-level

renewable energy purchasing experience, to assess the regional potential of renewal energy generation, transmission, and distribution by industry on or near Department of Defense installations in

the United States. Because of the Air Force’s scope and level of experience, the Committee recommends that the Air Force be designated the executive agent.

The assessment is expected to encompass installations in each of

the services and should include an analysis of the overall cost, benefit, and risk of various renewable energy proposals. The Department is also directed to provide a plan for encouraging the participation of private industry in the development and provision of renewable energy, and address the Department’s market, regulatory,

legal, cost and other possible impediments to an increased reliance

on renewable resources. A thorough assessment is expected to take

a minimum of 12 to 15 months to complete, at an estimated cost

of $10,000,000. Given the critical importance of this assessment,

the Committee directs that of the $35,600,000 in the Energy Conservation Improvement Project fund, $10,000,000 be allocated to

this assessment. The Department is directed to provide the congressional defense committees with an interim report on the scope

and method of the assessment no later than April 30, 2002, and a

final report no later than April 30, 2003.

JOINT USE FACILITIES

Joint Use Facilities—Joint Future Years’ Defense Plan (FYDP).—

The Committee recognizes the efficiencies gained by the construction of joint use—multi-service facilities. However, past initiatives

to begin development of such projects have produced limited results. It is the belief of the Committee that the military services,

including the reserve components, should be encouraged to develop

joint use facilities without the penalty of having the cost of the entire facility added to the FYDP of only one component.
24

Given that it is within the authority of the Secretary of Defense,

through the Office of the Comptroller, to develop a separate future

year defense plans account for the application of such joint use

projects, the Committee directs the Secretary of Defense, through

the Office of the Comptroller, to develop such an account, within

the existing funding constraints, that would encourage the application for, and construction of, joint-use, multi-service projects

throughout the services including the reserve components. The

Committee further encourages the Department to submit a budget

in fiscal year 2003 with the inclusion of a Joint Future Years’ Defense Plan (FYDP).

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to report to the

congressional defense committees on the Department’s plan to develop a Joint Future Years’ Defense Plan no later than February

15, 2002.

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, RESERVE COMPONENTS

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $702,608,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 615,238,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 799,168,000

The Committee recommends $799,168,000 for military construction projects for the Guard and Reserve components. This amount

is $183,930,000 above the fiscal year 2002 budget request. This increase reflects the Committee’s continued strong support for the

Guard and Reserve.

The Committee’s recommended action on each Reserve component project is reflected in the State list at the end of this report.

The Committee recommends approval of military construction,

Reserve component as outlined in the following table:

RESERVE COMPONENT

Component Request Recommended

Army National Guard ...................................................................................... $267,389,000 $378,549,000

Air National Guard ......................................................................................... 149,072,000 222,767,000

Army Reserve .................................................................................................. 111,404,000 111,404,000

Naval Reserve (including rescission) ............................................................ 33,641,000 32,716,000

Air Force Reserve ........................................................................................... 53,732,000 53,732,000

Total .................................................................................................. 615,238,000 799,168,000

Weapons of Mass Destruction—Civil Support Teams.—The Committee notes the continued progress by the Department in establishing the Weapons of Mass Destruction—Civil Support Teams

(WMD/CST), and in the administrative and organizational restructuring.

However, the National Guard has continued requirements for additional, adequate facilities from which to train, and to coordinate

with other Federal and State agencies, and to store decontamination and reconnaissance equipment. Any outstanding requirements

in this area must be fully integrated into the overall resourcing

strategy for responding to events addressing weapons of mass destruction and civil support. The Committee has provided the Army

National Guard an additional $9,000,000, in unspecified minor con-
25

struction funding to directly support the completion of facilities for

the next seven WMD/CST locations. The Committee directs the

Chief of the National Guard Bureau to report to the congressional

defense committees on the distribution of these funds no later than

60 days following the designation of the remaining locations of the

27 initial sites.

The Committee has added funding for specific Reserve component planning and design initiatives. The Committee recommendation also provides additional funding over the budget request for

minor construction activities for the Reserve components.

The Committee fully expects contracts for the following projects

to be awarded, as early in fiscal year 2002 as practical:

Readiness Center, Warren, AR.—Of the $34,378,000 provided for

planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account,

the Committee directs that $30,000 be made available for the planning and design of this readiness center.

Reconstruct Leadership Academy, Camp Rowland, CT.—Of the

$34,378,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army

National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$520,000 be made available for the design to reconstruct this leadership academy.

Maintenance Shop, Camp Blanding, FL.—Of the $34,378,000

provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National

Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,400,000 be made available for the design of this maintenance

shop.

Consolidated Maintenance Facility, Esler/Pineville, LA.—Of the

$34,378,000 provided for planning and design with the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,700,000 be made available for the design of this maintenance facility.

Readiness Center, Kosciusko, MS.—Of the $34,378,000 provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that $300,000 be made available for

the design of this readiness center.

Integrated Special Operations Training Facility, Camp Dawson,

WV.—Of the $34,378,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that

$2,000,000 be made available for the planning and design of this

operations and training facility.

Aviation Classification Repair (AVCRAD), Springfield, MO.—Of

the $34,378,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Army

National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,620,000 be made available for the design of this aviation repair

facility.

Unit Training Equipment Site (UTES), Fort Indiantown Gap,

PA.—Of the $34,378,000 provided for planning and design within

the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $1,500,000 be made available for the design of this

equipment site.

Readiness Center, Watertown, SD.—Of the $34,378,000 provided

for planning and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $514,000 be made

available for the design of this readiness center.
26

Joint Army National Guard/Air National Guard Readiness Center, Martinsburg, WV.—Of the $34,378,000 provided for planning

and design within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,000,000 be made available for

the design of this readiness center.

Security Forces Facility, Eielson Air Force Base, AK.—Of the

$7,342,000 provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,000,000 be made available for the design of this security forces

facility.

Airfield Facilities Upgrade, Des Moines, IA.—Of the $7,342,000

provided for planning and design within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $370,000 be

made available for the design of this airfield upgrade.

Airfield Facilities Upgrade, Martinsburg Air National Guard

Base, WV.—Of the $7,342,000 provided for planning and design

within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs

that not less than $2,000,000 be made available for the design of

this airfield upgrade.

Scout Armories, AK.—Of the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified

minor construction within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the

Committee directs that not less than $1,487,000 be made available

for the construction of these scout armories in Kipnuk, Newtok,

and Kake, Alaska.

Entry Way/Guard Facility, Fort Harrison, MT.—Of the

$22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that

$727,000 be made available for the construction of this entry way/

guard facility.

Storage Building, Camp Grafton, ND.—Of the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army National

Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than

$1,499,000 be made available for the construction of a storage

building.

Joint Use Training Facility, Rickenbacker Army National Guard

Base, OH.—Of the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $1,274,000 be made available for

the construction of this training facility.

C–26 Hangar, Rickenbacker Army National Guard Base, OH.—Of

the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within

the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $1,365,000 be made available for the construction of

this hangar.

Courseware Development Support Facility, Camp Murray, WA.—

Of the $22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction

within the ‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs

that not less than $1,375,000 be made available for the construction of this support facility.

Airfield Facilities Upgrade, Camp Dawson, WV.—Of the

$22,381,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the

‘‘Army National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not

less than $1,000,000 be made available for the construction of these

airfield upgrades.
27

Munitions Storage Facility, McConnell Air Force Base, KS.—Of

the $8,425,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within

the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not

less than $1,500,000 be made available for the construction of this

munitions storage facility.

Alter Command Post/Logistics Base, Selfridge Air National

Guard Base, MI.—Of the $8,425,000 provided for unspecified minor

construction within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that not less than $425,000 be made available for

this command post addition.

Engineering Storage Facility, Malmstrom Air Force Base, MT.—

Of the $8,425,000 provided for unspecified minor construction within the ‘‘Air National Guard’’ account, the Committee directs that

not less than $1,500,000 be made available for this storage facility.

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT

PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $171,622,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 162,600,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 162,600,000

The Committee has provided $162,600,000 for the North Atlantic

Treaty Organization [NATO] Security Investment Program for fiscal year 2002, fully funding the budget request.

The Committee continues the requirement that no funds will be

used for projects (including planning and design) related to the enlargement of NATO and the Partnership for Peace program, unless

Congress is notified 21 days in advance of the obligation of funds.

In addition, the Committee’s intent is that section 122 of the General Provisions shall apply to this program.

The Department of Defense is directed to identify separately the

level of effort anticipated for NATO enlargement and for Partnership for Peace for that fiscal year in future budget justifications.

FAMILY HOUSING OVERVIEW

The Committee has provided $4,128,383,000 for family housing

construction, operations and maintenance, and the Department’s

family housing improvement fund. This amount is $61,866,000

above the fiscal year 2002 budget request and $470,765,000 above

the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2001.

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $1,211,572,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 1,400,533,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,421,733,000

The Committee recommends a total of $1,421,733,000 for family

housing, Army, in fiscal year 2002. This is $21,200,000 over the fiscal year 2002 budget request.

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $80,400,000 for new construction instead of $59,200,000 as requested, as shown below:
28

Location/project Requested Recommended

Alaska: Fort Wainwright (32 Units) Southern Lights .................................... $12,000,000 $12,000,000

Arizona: Fort Huachuca (72 Units) Pershing Plaza West .............................. 10,800,000 10,800,000

Kansas: Fort Leavenworth (80 Units) ............................................................ 10,000,000 20,000,000

Texas:

Fort Bliss (76 Units) ............................................................................. 13,600,000 13,600,000

Fort Sam Houston (80 Units) ................................................................ ........................ 11,200,000

Korea: Camp Humphreys (54 Units) .............................................................. 12,800,000 12,800,000

Total .................................................................................................. 59,200,000 80,400,000

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts

provided for construction improvements:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Alabama: Ft. Rucker (28 units) ..................................................................... $2,400,000 $2,400,000

Washington, DC: Walter Reed Army Medical Center (221 units) .................. 100,000 100,000

Georgia: Ft. Stewart/Hunter AAF (2,927 units) Privatization ........................ 37,800,000 37,800,000

Kentucky: Ft. Campbell (4,540 units) Privatization ...................................... 52,800,000 52,800,000

Maryland:

Aberdeen Proving Ground (10 units) .................................................... 1,050,000 1,050,000

Ft. Detrick (155 units) Privatization ..................................................... 1,200,000 1,200,000

New Jersey: Picatinny Arsenal (116 units) Privatization ............................... 500,000 500,000

New York:

Ft. Hamilton (436 units) Privatization .................................................. 2,200,000 2,200,000

West Point (51 units) New Brick .......................................................... 9,400,000 9,400,000

North Carolina: Ft. Bragg (4,744 units) Privatization ................................... 50,000,000 50,000,000

Germany:

Ansbach (128 units) Bleidorn ............................................................... 14,400,000 14,400,000

Baumholder (188 units) ........................................................................ 5,300,000 5,300,000

Darmstadt (180 units) .......................................................................... 6,600,000 6,600,000

Stuttgart (30 units) Boeblingen ........................................................... 3,600,000 3,600,000

Stuttgart (45 units) Steuben & Weicht Village .................................... 5,200,000 5,200,000

Wiesbaden (432 units) .......................................................................... 12,600,000 12,600,000

Italy: Vicenza (156 units) .............................................................................. 11,600,000 11,600,000

Korea: Yongsan (17 units) ............................................................................. 4,000,000 4,000,000

Total .................................................................................................. 220,750,000 220,750,000

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $1,317,160,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 1,222,495,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,230,695,000

The Committee recommends $1,230,695,000 for family housing,

Navy and Marine Corps, in fiscal year 2002. This amount is

$8,200,000 over the fiscal year 2002 budget request.

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $123,047,000 for new construction

instead of $114,847,000 as requested, as shown below:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Arizona: MCAS Yuma (51 Units) .................................................................... $9,017,000 $9,017,000
29

Location/project Requested Recommended

California: Twentynine Palms (74 Units) Marine Palms Housing area ........ 16,250,000 16,250,000

Hawaii:

MCB Kaneohe Bay (172 Units) Housing areas 63 & 64 ...................... 46,996,000 55,196,000

CNB Pearl Harbor (70 Units) Hale Moku .............................................. 16,827,000 16,827,000

Mississippi: NAS Pascagoula (160 Units) ..................................................... 23,354,000 23,354,000

Italy: NAS Sigonella (10 Units) ...................................................................... 2,403,000 2,403,000

Total .................................................................................................. 114,847,000 123,047,000

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts

provided for construction improvements:

Location/project Requested Recommended

California:

COMNAVBASE San Diego (160 units) ................................................... $16,055,000 $16,055,000

Camp Pendleton (40 units) San Onofre ............................................... 3,700,000 3,700,000

Camp Pendleton (3,200 units MCB Pendleton, 111 units MWTC

Brideport, 284 MCB Pendleton) Privatized ....................................... 14,737,000 14,737,000

Washington, DC:

Marine Barracks 8th & I (Quarters 2) .................................................. 945,000 945,000

Marine Barracks 8th & I (Quarters 4) .................................................. 949,000 949,000

Marine Barracks 8th & I (Quarters 6) .................................................. 1,788,000 1,788,000

Florida:

NAS Pensacola (36 units) Cabannis Crescent ..................................... 2,557,000 2,557,000

NAS Pensacola (14 units) Light House Terrace ................................... 1,267,000 1,267,000

NAS Whiting Field (115 units) Whiting Pines ...................................... 9,873,000 9,873,000

Maryland:

USNA Anapolis (42 units) North Severn Village ................................... 3,955,000 3,955,000

NAS Patuxent River (28 units) Chaffee Court ...................................... 1,609,000 1,609,000

Mississippi: NAS Meridian (118 units) .......................................................... 8,696,000 8,696,000

North Carolina:

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (80 units) Watkins Village ............ 4,569,000 4,569,000

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (30 units) Paradise Point ............. 3,172,000 3,172,000

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (1 unit) Quarters 2000 ................. 70,000 70,000

Tennessee: NSA Mid South, Memphis (773 units Privatized) ....................... 12,370,000 12,370,000

Virginia:

COMNAVREG Norfolk (12 units) Pecan Crescent .................................. 582,000 582,000

COMNAVREG Norfolk (25 units) Fairway Crescent ............................... 1,600,000 1,600,000

ACSC Wallops Island (28 units) Blades Circle .................................... 2,917,000 2,917,000

Iceland:

NAS Keflavik (95 units) SP housing area ............................................ 26,074,000 26,074,000

NAS Keflavik (65 units) Lower Commissary housing area ................... 12,681,000 12,681,000

Japan:

CFA Sasebo: Hario Village (44 units) Dragon Vale (8 Units) .............. 608,000 608,000

CNFJ Yokosuka (96 units) ..................................................................... 9,475,000 9,475,000

CNFJ Yokosuka (96 units) ..................................................................... 10,398,000 10,398,000

CNFJ Yokosuka (78 units) ..................................................................... 7,029,000 7,029,000

MCAS Iwakuni (44 units) Midrise 656 ................................................. 1,293,000 1,293,000

Marianas Island: CNFM Guam (44 units) New Apra Heights ....................... 7,620,000 7,620,000

United Kingdom:

NAVACTS London (70 units) Daws Hill ................................................. 7,530,000 7,530,000

NAVACTS London (80 units) West Ruislip ............................................ 8,935,000 8,935,000

Total .................................................................................................. 183,054,000 183,054,000
30

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $1,084,099,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 1,387,358,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 1,419,824,000

The Committee recommends $1,419,824,000 for family housing,

Air Force, in fiscal year 2002, which is $32,466,000 over the budget

request.

CONSTRUCTION

The Committee recommends $150,800,000 for new construction,

instead of $140,800,000 as requested, as shown below:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Arizona: Luke AFB (120 Units) ....................................................................... $15,712,000 $15,712,000

California: Travis AFB (118 Units) ................................................................ 18,150,000 18,150,000

Colorado: Buckley AFB (55 Units) .................................................................. 11,400,000 11,400,000

Delaware: Dover AFB (120 Units) .................................................................. 18,145,000 18,145,000

Washington, DC: Bolling AFB (136 Units) Ph 7 ............................................ 16,926,000 16,926,000

Hawaii: Hickam AFB (102 Units) Ph 1 .......................................................... 25,037,000 25,037,000

Idaho: Mountain Home AFB (56 Units) Ph 4 ................................................. ........................ 10,000,000

Louisiana: Barksdale AFB (56 Units) Ph 1 ................................................... 7,300,000 7,300,000

South Dakota: Ellsworth AFB (78 Units) Ph 1 .............................................. 13,700,000 13,700,000

Virginia: Langley AFB (4 Units) ..................................................................... 1,200,000 1,200,000

Portugal: Lajes AFB Azores (64 Units) Ph 2 ................................................. 13,230,000 13,230,000

Total .................................................................................................. 140,800,000 150,800,000

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS

The following projects are to be accomplished within the amounts

provided for construction improvements:

Location/project Requested Recommended

Alaska: Elmendorf AFB (624 units) Privatization .......................................... $12,300,000 $12,300,000

Arizona: Luke AFB—Improve Electrical System ............................................ 1,084,000 1,084,000

California:

Beale AFB (1,444 units) Privatization .................................................. 14,500,000 14,500,000

Travis AFB (49 units) ............................................................................ 3,276,000 3,276,000

Colorado: USAF Academy—Improve Gas Valve Facility ................................ 297,000 297,000

Delaware: Dover AFB—Improve Family Housing Management Office .......... 400,000 400,000

Washington, DC: Bolling AFB (2 units) ......................................................... 690,000 690,000

Florida: Eglin Aux Field 9 (330 Units) Privatization ..................................... ........................ ........................

Hawaii:

Hickam AFB (1,356 units) Privatization ............................................... 15,420,000 15,420,000

Hickam AFB—Improve Infrastructure ................................................... 2,167,000 2,167,000

Illinois: Scott AFB—Improve Housing Office ................................................. 550,000 550,000

Louisiana: Barksdale AFB—Improve Water Distribution System .................. 1,500,000 1,500,000

Maryland:

Andrews AFB (202 units) ...................................................................... 16,789,000 16,789,000

Andrews AFB (115 units) Privatization ................................................. 7,779,000 7,779,000

Andrews AFB—Improve Housing Office ............................................... 600,000 600,000

Massachusetts: Hanscom AFB—Improve Utilities Systems .......................... 1,100,000 1,100,000

Missouri:

Whiteman AFB (176 units) ................................................................... ........................ 17,966,000

Whiteman AFB—Improve Sewer System .............................................. 500,000 500,000

Nevada: Nellis AFB (1,313 units) Privatization ............................................. 1,466,000 1,466,000
31

Location/project Requested Recommended

New Jersey: McGuire AFB (1,882 units) Privatization ................................... 27,127,000 27,127,000

North Dakota: Grand Forks AFB (181 units) ................................................. 17,810,000 17,810,000

South Carolina:

Charleston AFB (178 units) .................................................................. 13,495,000 13,495,000

Charleston AFB (50 units) Hunley Park, Ph 2 ...................................... ........................ 4,500,000

Texas: Lackland AFB (564 units) Privatization ............................................. 20,733,000 20,733,000

Virginia:

Langley AFB (66 units) Improve Historic Family Housing .................... 15,746,000 15,746,000

Langley AFB (1,268 units) Privatization ............................................... 16,700,000 16,700,000

Wyoming: F.E. Warren AFB—Improve Sanitary Sewer Mains ........................ 470,000 470,000

Germany:

Ramstein AB (407 units) ...................................................................... 46,668,000 46,668,000

Ramstein AB—Improve Common Neighborhood Areas ........................ 1,012,000 1,012,000

Spangdahlem AFB (138 units) ............................................................. 15,632,000 15,632,000

Guam: Andersen AFB (112 units) Ph 10 ....................................................... 17,534,000 17,534,000

Japan:

Kadena AB (108 units) Ph 2 ................................................................ 13,582,000 13,582,000

Yokota AFB (281 units) Ph 1 ................................................................ 16,240,000 16,240,000

United Kingdom:.

RAF Croughton (158 units) ................................................................... 16,100,000 16,100,000

RAF Lackenheath (156 units) ............................................................... 15,208,000 15,208,000

RAF Mildenhall (31 units) ..................................................................... 5,808,000 5,808,000

RAF Molesworth (119 units) ................................................................. 12,596,000 12,596,000

Total .................................................................................................. 352,879,000 375,345,000

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $44,787,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 44,012,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 44,012,000

The Committee recommends $44,012,000 for family housing, Defense-wide, in fiscal year 2002. This amount is equal to the budget

request. Specific details are included in the tables at the end of the

report.

FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. ...........................

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... $2,000,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 2,000,000

The Committee recommends $2,000,000 for the Family Housing

Improvement Fund. This amount is equal to the budget request.

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND, DEFENSE

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. ...........................

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... $10,119,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 10,119,000

The Committee recommends $10,119,000 for the Homeowners

Assistance Fund, which is equal to the amount of the budget request.

The Homeowners Assistance Fund is a non-expiring revolving

fund which finances a program for providing assistance to homeowners by reducing their losses incident to the disposal of their

homes when military installations at or near where they are serv-
32

ing or employed are ordered to be closed or the scope of operations

is reduced. The Fund was established in recognition of the fact that

base closure and reduction actions can have serious economic effects on local communities. The Fund receives funding from several

sources: appropriations, borrowing authority, reimbursable authority, prior fiscal year unobligated balances, revenue from sale of acquired properties, and recovery of prior year obligations.

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

OVERVIEW

The Congress has appropriated, to date, a net total of

$21,393,333,000 for the Base Realignment and Closure program for

fiscal years 1990 through 2001. In the bill for fiscal year 2002, the

Committee is recommending total funding of $682,200,000 under

one account.

The Committee, in appropriating such funds, has provided the

Department with the flexibility to allocate funds by Service, by

function and by base. The Committee, in recognizing the complexities of realigning and closing bases and providing for environmental restoration, has provided such flexibility to allow the Office

of the Secretary of Defense to monitor the program execution of the

Services and to redistribute unobligated balances as appropriate to

avoid delays and to effect timely execution of realignment and closures along with environmental restoration.

The following table displays the total amount appropriated for

each round of base closure including amounts recommended for fiscal year 2002:

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

[Total funding, fiscal year 1990 through fiscal year 2002]

Fiscal year 1990

through fiscal

year 2000

Fiscal year 2001

enacted

Fiscal year 2002

Committee recommendedTotal

Part I ...................................................... $2,684,577,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) $2,684,577,000

Part II ..................................................... 4,915,636,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 4,915,636,000

Part III .................................................... 7,269,267,000 ( 1 ) ( 1 ) 7,269,267,000

Part IV .................................................... 5,492,738,000 $1,031,115,000 $682,200,000 7,206,053,000

Total .......................................... 20,362,218,000 1,031,115,000 682,200,000 22,075,533,000

1 Not applicable.

Since the start of the current process for Base Realignment and

Closure, Military Construction Appropriations Acts have appropriated a net total of $21,393,333,000 for the entire program for fiscal years 1990 through 2001. The total amount appropriated combined with the budget requested for fiscal year 2002 Base Realignment and Closure is a total of $22,075,533,000.

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV

Appropriations, 2001 ............................................................................. $1,031,115,000

Budget estimate, 2002 ........................................................................... 532,200,000

Committee recommendation ................................................................. 682,200,000
33

The Committee recommends $682,200,000 for the base realignment and closure account, part IV. This is an increase of

$150,000,000 over the amount requested for fiscal year 2002, and

$348,915,000 under the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2001.

The Committee is deeply concerned about the adequacy of funding for, and pace of, environmental cleanup at BRAC installations.

Of particular concern are the substantial shortfalls in the Navy

and Air Force fiscal 2002 budget submissions for ‘‘must pay’’ BRAC

environmental cleanup costs. Both services identified to this Committee environmental requirements that must be funded in fiscal

year 2002 that were not included in the revised budget submission.

The Navy has reported a shortfall of $167,627,000 for urgent environmental remediation projects, including health and safety threats

and legal commitments, at 16 installations. The Air Force shortfall

is $55,000,000 for clean up projects at 7 installations.

The administration’s fiscal year 2002 budget request is $532,200,000. The request is $498,915,000 below the amount appropriated for fiscal year 2001, and $150,000,000 below the Committee recommendation of $682,200,000. The Committee believes

that the budget request is wholly inadequate to meet the current

environmental cleanup requirements at BRAC installations. To

help make up the services’ urgent shortfall in funding, the Com- mittee recommends that the unobligated balance of $55,030,000 remaining in the fiscal year 2001 Defense-wide account, ‘‘National

Missile Defense Initial Deployment Facilities Phase 1,’’ be rescinded and that the funds be reallocated to the base realignment

and closure account, part IV, specifically to offset the Navy and Air

Force BRAC environmental shortfalls. The Committee recommends

this offset as a result of the Department’s decision to shift the proposed national missile defense construction program from military

construction into research, test, development, and evaluation. The Committee also recommends that $19,588,000 be rescinded

from previously appropriated Navy planning and design funds, and

that $925,000 be rescinded from previously appropriated Naval Reserve planning and design funds and reallocated to the BRAC account so that the Navy will have an additional source of funds to

meet its BRAC oblications.

In all, to help the communities affected by the services’ environmental remediation shortfalls, the Committee recommends an increase of $150,000,000 over the budget request for the base realignment and closure account, part IV, and strongly urges the Department to accelerate to the maximum extent possible the environmental cleanup of BRAC installations. Consistent with the requirements identified by the Navy and the Air Force, the Committee

also expects the Department to properly fund this account to fully

meet its requirements and honor its commitments in future budget

requests. The Committee expects the Department to give priority

consideration to the projects that the Navy and Air Force have

identified as urgent unfunded requirements, and to execute these

projects as expeditiously as possible in fiscal year 2002.

The Committee also directs the Department to provide a report

by March 1, 2002, detailing the ongoing BRAC environmental remediation projects of each of the services and relevant Defense

Agencies. The report should include the following elements: (1) the
34

total funds allocated to each project through fiscal year 2002, (2)

the budget request for fiscal year 2003, (3) details of the mandatory

spending requirements for fiscal year 2003 based on legal and regulatory commitments, (4) the projected cost to complete each

project, and (5) the projected completion date.

HUNTERS POINT NAVAL SHIPYARD

Of particular concern to the Committee is the level of progress

being made on BRAC environmental remediation at the former

Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in California.

The Committee directs the Secretary of Defense to provide the

congressional defense committees, within 90 days of the enactment

of this Act, with a master plan for the cleanup of Hunters Point

Naval Shipyard. This plan should include a detailed cleanup schedule plus cost estimates for each parcel as well as for the entire

project. Following submission of the initial report, the Secretary is

directed to provide semi-annual progress reports to the defense congressional committees.

The Committee expects the Navy to fully fund the cleanup of the

shipyard in a timely manner, and to execute as expeditiously as

possible the total fiscal year 2002 program, at no less than the

budgeted level of $50,608,000. This includes allocating sufficient resources to complete the cleanup of Parcel B, to continue the cleanup of Parcels C and D, and to initiate site characterization of Parcels E and F in fiscal year 2002. The Committee also expects the

Navy to adequately fund the cleanup of Parcels C and D and the

site characterization of Parcels E and F as expeditiously as possible

in accordance with the master plan.

ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, MC CLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE, CA

The closure of McClellan Air Force Base was completed on July

13, 2001. Productive re-use of the base is now underway, and nearly 2,000 of the 25,000 jobs lost to the Sacramento Region with the

base closure have been recreated. An estimated $490,000,000 in

BRAC environmental remediation funds will be required to complete the base clean up program. Of particular concern to the Committee is the urgent requirement to clean up the plutonium contamination at the installation. In addition to the $35,754,000 included in the President’s fiscal year 2002 budget for environmental

clean up at McClellan AFB, the Air Force has identified to the

Committee a shortfall of $22,600,000 for fiscal year 2002 clean up

activities at McClellan. The Committee expects the Air Force to

fully fund the environmental remediation program at McClellan in

2002 and beyond.
(35)

GENERAL PROVISIONS

The following lists general provisions proposed by the Committee. The Committee recommends inclusion of several proposals

which have been incorporated in previous appropriations acts, provisions requested by the Defense Department, and new provisions.

The Committee recommendations are as follows:

SEC. 101. Restricts payments under a cost-plus-a-fixed-fee contract for work, except in cases of contracts for environmental restoration at base closure sites.

SEC. 102. Permits use of funds for hire of passenger motor vehicles.

SEC. 103. Permits use of funds for defense access roads.

SEC. 104. Prohibits construction of new bases inside the continental United States for which specific appropriations have not

been made.

SEC. 105. Limits the use of funds for purchase of land or land

easements.

SEC. 106. Prohibits the use of funds to acquire land, prepare a

site, or install utilities for any family housing except housing for

which funds have been made available.

SEC. 107. Limits the use of minor construction funds to transfer

or relocate activities among installations.

SEC. 108. Prohibits the procurement of steel unless American

producers, fabricators, and manufacturers have been allowed to

compete.

SEC. 109. Prohibits payments of real property taxes in foreign

nations.

SEC. 110. Prohibits construction of new bases overseas without

prior notification.

SEC. 111. Establishes a threshold for American preference of

$500,000 relating to architect and engineering services.

SEC. 112. Establishes preference for American contractors for

military construction in the United States territories and possessions in the Pacific, and on Kwajalein Atoll, or in the Arabian Gulf.

SEC. 113. Requires notification of military exercises involving construction in excess of $100,000.

SEC. 114. Limits obligations during the last 2 months of the year.

SEC. 115. Permits funds appropriated in prior years to be available for construction authorized during the current session of Congress.

SEC. 116. Permits the use of expired or lapsed funds to pay the

cost of supervision for any project being completed with lapsed

funds.

SEC. 117. Permits obligation of funds from more than 1 fiscal

year to execute a construction project, provided that the total obligation for such project is consistent with the total amount appropriated for the project.
36

SEC. 118. Allows expired funds to be transferred to the ‘‘Foreign

currency fluctuations, construction, defense’’ account.

SEC. 119. Directs the Department to report annually on actions

taken to encourage other nations to assume a greater share of the

common defense budget.

SEC. 120. Allows transfer of proceeds from earlier base realignment and closure accounts to the continuing base realignment and

closure accounts.

SEC. 121. Permits the transfer of funds from Family Housing

Construction accounts to the DOD Family Housing Improvement

Fund.

SEC. 122. Restricts the use of funds for the Partnership for Peace

Program.

SEC. 123. Requires the Secretary of Defense to notify the congressional defense committees of all family housing privatization solicitations and agreements which contain any clause providing consideration for base realignment and closure, force reductions and extended deployments.

SEC. 124. Provides transfer authority to the Homeowners Assistance Program.

SEC. 125. Requires that all Military Construction Appropriations

Acts be the sole funding source of all operation and maintenance

for family housing, including flag and general officer quarters, and

limits the repair on flag and general officer quarters to $35,000 per

year without prior notification to the defense committees.

SEC. 126. Provides for completion of the Masirah Island Airfield

project in Oman.

SEC. 127. Directs the Secretary of Defense to submit to the congressional defense committees a Master Plan for the environmental

remediation of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, California.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE

Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires that Committee reports on general appropriations bills identify each Committee amendment to

the House bill ‘‘which proposes an item of appropriation which is

not made to carry out the provisions of an existing law, a treaty

stipulation, or an act or resolution previously passed by the Senate

during that session.’’

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI OF THE

STANDING RULES OF THE SENATE

Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports on

a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute or part

of any statute include ‘‘(a) the text of the statute or part thereof

which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a comparative print of

that part of the bill or joint resolution making the amendment and

of the statute or part thereof proposed to be amended, showing by

stricken-through type and italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical devices the omissions and insertions which

would be made by the bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form

recommended by the committee.’’

The Committee bill as recommended contains no such provisions.
37

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

ALABAMA

ARMY:

ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT:

COMPONENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............................................ 2,300 2,300 ......................

REBUILD SHOP AND FACILITY ........................................................ 2,850 2,850 ......................

FORT RUCKER: COMMANCHE SIMULATOR TRAINING FACILITY ............... 11,400 11,400 ......................

REDSTONE ARSENAL: DINING FACILITY ................................................... 7,200 7,200 ......................

AIR FORCE:

MAXWELL AFB:

SQUADRON OFFICER SCHOOL ACADEMIC FACILITY ....................... 9,000 9,000 ......................

OFFICER TRAINING SCHOOL DORMITORY ....................................... 11,800 11,800 ......................

SQUADRON OFFICER SCHOOL DORMITORY .................................... 13,600 13,600 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

HUNTSVILLE: UNIT TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE ....................................... 7,498 7,498 ......................

MOBILE: ADD/ALTER READINESS CENTER ............................................... 5,333 5,333 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DOTHAN: COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS SQUADRON ...... ...................... 11,000 ∂11,000

AIR FORCE RESERVE:

MAXWELL AFB:

FUEL CELL MAINTENANCE HANGAR ............................................... 7,300 7,300 ......................

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ................................................. 9,900 9,900 ......................

TOTAL, ALABAMA ........................................................................ 88,181 99,181 ∂11,000

ALASKA

ARMY:

FORT RICHARDSON: BARRACKS COMPLEX (PHASE I) ............................. 45,000 45,000 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT:

ASSEMBLY BUILDING ...................................................................... 4,200 4,200 ......................

POWER PLANT COOLING TOWER .................................................... 23,000 23,000 ......................

FORT RICHARDSON: MOUT TRAINING FACILITY ....................................... ...................... 18,000 ∂18,000

AIR FORCE:

EARECKSON AFB: UPGRADE WASTEWATER SYSTEM ............................... 4,600 4,600 ......................

ELMENDORF AFB:

ADD/ALTER AIRCRAFT FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE HANGAR ....... 12,200 12,200 ......................

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 20,000 20,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

EIELSON AFB: REPLACE BULK FUEL STORAGE TANKS ............................ 8,800 8,800 ......................

FORT WAINWRIGHT: HOSPITAL REPLACEMENT (PHASE III) ..................... 18,500 18,500 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: JUNEAU: READINESS CENTER .................................. ...................... 7,568 ∂7,568

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ELMENDORF AFB: UPGRADE COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES ......................................................................................... 5,000 5,000 ......................

TOTAL, ALASKA .................................................................................... 141,300 166,868 ∂25,568

ARIZONA

ARMY: FORT HUACHUCA: EFFLUENT REUSE SYSTEM ...................................... 6,100 6,100 ......................

NAVY:

YUMA MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ....................................................... 6,750 6,750 ......................

LAND ACQUISITION (PHASE II) ....................................................... 8,660 8,660 ......................

STATION ORDNANCE AREA ............................................................. 7,160 7,160 ......................

AIR FORCE:

DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 8,700 8,700 ......................

REPLACE AIRCRAFT RECLAMATION/PARTS PROCESS COMPLEX .... 8,600 8,600 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: MARANA: AVIATION MAINTENANCE HANGAR ............ 14,358 14,358 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: MESA: RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP ............................................................................................................ 10,900 10,900 ......................

TOTAL, ARIZONA .................................................................................. 71,228 71,228 ......................
38

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

ARKANSAS

ARMY: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY

(PHASE VI) ................................................................................................... 26,000 ...................... ¥26,000

AIR FORCE:

LITTLE ROCK AFB:

C–130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ............................................ 10,600 10,600 ......................

FIRE STATION ................................................................................. ...................... 7,500 ∂7,500

DEFENSE-WIDE: PINE BLUFF ARSENAL: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE VI) ........................................................................................ ...................... 26,000 ∂26,000

TOTAL, ARKANSAS ............................................................................... 36,600 44,100 ∂7,500

CALIFORNIA

NAVY:

CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE:

AIRCRAFT HANGAR IMPROVEMENTS ............................................... 4,470 4,470 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 21,200 21,200 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 21,600 21,600 ......................

BOAT MAINTENANCE FACILITY ........................................................ 11,980 11,980 ......................

HELO OUTLYING LANDING FIELD (PHASE II) .................................. 3,910 3,910 ......................

INDOOR PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITY ............................................. 13,460 13,460 ......................

IRON/MANGANESE PLANT ............................................................... 11,180 11,180 ......................

REGIMENTAL ARTILLERY MAINTENANCE COMPLEX ........................ 13,160 13,160 ......................

CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE: EXPEDITIONARY WARFARE

TRAINING FACILITY .............................................................................. 8,610 8,610 ......................

EL CENTRO NAVAL AIR FACILITY: TRANSIENT BACHELOR ENLISTED

QUARTERS ........................................................................................... 23,520 23,520 ......................

LEMOORE NAVAL AIR STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS .......... 10,010 10,010 ......................

PORT HUENEME NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER:

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SCHOOL ................................................... 3,780 3,780 ......................

PORT IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................... 12,400 12,400 ......................

SAN DIEGO NAVAL STATION:

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 47,240 47,240 ......................

REPLACE PIERS 10/11 (PHASE II) ................................................. 17,500 17,500 ......................

SAN NICHOLAS ISLAND: SUPPLY PIER .................................................... 13,730 13,730 ......................

TWENTYNINE PALMS:

ACADEMIC INSTRUCTION BUILDING ............................................... 9,860 9,860 ......................

AMMUNITION STORAGE FACILITIES ................................................. 9,540 9,540 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 29,675 29,675 ......................

ENLISTED DINING FACILITY ............................................................ 11,930 11,930 ......................

RESERVE SUPPORT FACILITIES ...................................................... 8,760 8,760 ......................

VEHICLE WASH STATION ................................................................. 5,360 5,360 ......................

AIR FORCE:

EDWARDS AFB:

ADD/ALTER TERMINAL AREA CONTROL FACILITY ........................... 4,600 4,600 ......................

CONSOLIDATED SUPPORT FACILITY ................................................ 11,700 11,700 ......................

LOS ANGELES AFB: CONSOLIDATED BASE SUPPORT COMPLEX .............. 23,000 23,000 ......................

TRAVIS AFB:

REPLACE SUPPORT FACILITY .......................................................... 6,800 6,800 ......................

C–5 SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY ......................................... ...................... 9,600 ∂9,600

VANDENBERG AFB: MISSILE TRANSPORT BRIDGE .................................. 11,800 11,800 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

CAMP PENDLETON MARINE CORPS BASE:

FLEET HOSPITAL SUPPORT FACILITIES ........................................... 3,150 3,150 ......................

REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC (HORNO) ................................. 4,300 4,300 ......................

REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC (LAS FLORES) ......................... 3,800 3,800 ......................

REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC (LAS PULGAS) ........................ 4,050 4,050 ......................

TRACY DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT: REPLACE GENERAL PURPOSE

WAREHOUSE ........................................................................................ 30,000 30,000 ......................

CORONADO NAVAL AMPHIBIOUS BASE: SEAL TEAM FIVE OPERATIONS

FACILITY .............................................................................................. 13,650 13,650 ......................
39

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

TWENTYNINE PALMS: HOSPITAL LDRP CONVERSION ............................... 1,600 1,600 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

FORT IRWIN: MANEUVER AREA TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE (PHASE I) .. 21,953 21,953 ......................

LANCASTER: READINESS CENTER ........................................................... 4,530 4,530 ......................

AZUSA: READINESS CENTER ................................................................... ...................... 14,011 ∂14,011

NAVY RESERVE: PORT HUENEME NAVAL RESERVE CENTER: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ....................................................................................... 1,000 1,000 ......................

TOTAL, CALIFORNIA ............................................................................. 458,808 482,419 ∂23,611

COLORADO

ARMY:

FORT CARSON: BARRACKS COMPLEX (NELSON BLVD) (PHASE I) .......... 25,000 25,000 ......................

PUEBLO DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE

III) ....................................................................................................... 11,000 ...................... ¥11,000

AIR FORCE:

BUCKLEY AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 11,200 11,200 ......................

FITNESS CENTER ............................................................................ 12,000 12,000 ......................

CONTROL TOWER ............................................................................ ...................... 5,800 ∂5,800

SCHRIEVER AFB: SBIRS MISSION CONTROL STATION BACKUP ............... 19,000 19,000 ......................

U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY:

ADD/ALTER ATHLETIC FACILITIES (PHASE II) ................................. 11,400 11,400 ......................

INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING (ENLISTED DORMITORY) .................... 1,300 1,300 ......................

REPLACE CONTROL TOWER ............................................................ 6,400 6,400 ......................

UPGRADE POTABLE WATER SYSTEM (CADET AREA) ...................... 6,400 6,400 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

PUEBLO DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE

III) ....................................................................................................... ...................... 11,000 ∂11,000

SCHRIEVER AFB: MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC ............................................. 4,000 4,000 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: FORT CARSON: ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER/NEW

RESERVE CENTER ........................................................................................ 9,394 9,394 ......................

TOTAL, COLORADO .............................................................................. 117,094 122,894 ∂5,800

CONNECTICUT

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ORANGE ANGS: REPLACE AIR CONTROL SQUADRON

COMPLEX ..................................................................................................... 12,000 12,000 ......................

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ARMY: FORT MCNAIR: PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER ......................... 11,600 11,600 ......................

NAVY: ANACOSTIA: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS REPLACEMENT .............. 9,810 9,810 ......................

AIR FORCE: BOLLING AFB: ADD/ALTER CHAPEL CENTER ................................ 2,900 2,900 ......................

TOTAL, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA .......................................................... 24,310 24,310 ......................

DELAWARE

AIR FORCE: DOVER AFB: FIRE STAION ............................................................. ...................... 7,300 ∂7,300

FLORIDA

NAVY:

KEY WEST NAVAL AIR STATION: AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER/OPERATIONS BUILDING ................................................................................ 11,400 11,400 ......................

MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................. 16,420 16,420 ......................

PENSACOLA NAVAL AIR STATION: CONSOLIDATED FIRE STATION ........... ...................... 3,700 ∂3,700

WHITING FIELD NAVAL AIR STATION: AIRFIELD APPROACH LIGHTING ..... 2,140 2,140 ......................

AIR FORCE:

CAPE CANAVERAL AIR STATION: REPLACE FIRECRASH RESCUE STATION .................................................................................................... 7,800 7,800 ......................

EGLIN AFB: COMMAND AND CONTROL TEST OPERATIONS CENTER ........ 11,400 11,400 ......................

HURLBURT FIELD:

CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATION FACILITY ................................... 4,000 4,000 ......................
40

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

DINING FACILITY/FITNESS CENTER ................................................. 6,400 6,400 ......................

MACDILL AFB: MISSION PLANNING CENTER (PHASE I) ........................... 10,000 ...................... ¥10,000

TYNDALL AFB:

F–22 FUELS SYSTEM MAINTANENCE HANGAR ............................... 3,050 3,050 ......................

F–22 SQUAD OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT MAINT UNIT HANGAR .......... 12,000 12,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

HURLBURT FIELD:

ADD/ALTER MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC ............................................. 8,800 8,800 ......................

CV–22 TRAINING DEVICE SUPPORT FACILITY ................................ 10,200 10,200 ......................

READINESS SUPPLY PACKAGE FACILITY ......................................... 3,200 3,200 ......................

MACDILL AFB:

PUBLIC ACCESS BUILDING ............................................................. 2,500 2,500 ......................

RENOVATE COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY ............................. 9,500 9,500 ......................

MAYPORT NAVAL STATION: REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC ............. 24,000 24,000 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP BLANDING: REPLACE WEATHER TRAINING

COMPLEX ..................................................................................................... 6,900 6,900 ......................

NAVY RESERVE:

JACKSONVILLE NAVAL AIR STATION:

HANGAR RENOVATIONS .................................................................. 3,744 3,744 ......................

MARINE CORPS RESERVE TRAINING CENTER ................................ ...................... ...................... ......................

READINESS SUPPORT SITE FACILITIES ........................................... 2,500 2,500 ......................

TOTAL, FLORIDA ......................................................................... 155,954 149,654 ¥6,300

GEORGIA

ARMY:

FORT BENNING:

PASSENGER PROCESSING FACILITY ............................................... 17,000 17,000 ......................

RUNWAY EXTENSION ...................................................................... 6,900 6,900 ......................

FORT GILLEM:

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FORENSIC LABORATORY ....................... 29,000 29,000 ......................

EXPLOSIVE ORDANCE DETACHMENT OPERATIONS BUILDING ......... 5,600 5,600 ......................

FORT GORDON:

INFORMATION SYSTEMS FACILITY .................................................. 11,000 11,000 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 23,000 23,000 ......................

FORT STEWART:

EDUCATION CENTER ....................................................................... 16,000 16,000 ......................

SOLDIER SERVICE CENTER ............................................................ 10,200 10,200 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 13,600 13,600 ......................

AIR FORCE:

MOODY AFB: FITNESS CENTER ................................................................ ...................... 8,600 ∂8,600

ROBINS AFB:

FIRE TRAINING FACILITY ................................................................. 3,800 3,800 ......................

LARGE ITEM AIRCRAFT SUPPORT EQUIPMENT PAINT FAC ............. 3,050 3,050 ......................

REPLACE KC–135 SQUADRON OPERATIONS .................................. 7,800 7,800 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

ALBANY MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE: REPLACE MEDICAL/DENTAL

CLINIC ................................................................................................. 5,800 5,800 ......................

FORT BENNING: TACTICAL EQUIPMENT COMPLEX ................................... 5,100 5,100 ......................

FORT STEWART: CONSOLIDATED TROOP MEDICAL CLINIC ...................... 11,000 11,000 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ROBINS AFB: REPLACE OPERATIONS AND TRAINING

COMPLEX ..................................................................................................... 6,100 6,100 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: ROBINS AFB: AIR FORCE RESERVE HEADQUARTERS

(PHASE II) .................................................................................................... 2,000 2,000 ......................

TOTAL, GEORGIA ................................................................................. 176,950 185,550 ∂8,600

HAWAII

ARMY:

PEARL HARBOR: SHIPPING OPERATIONS BUILDING ................................ 11,800 11,800 ......................

POHAKULOA TRAINING AREA:

COMMAND AND RANGE CONTROL BUILDING ................................. 5,100 5,100 ......................
41

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

LAND ACQUISITION PARKER RANCH ............................................... ...................... 1,500 ∂1,500

KAHUKU WINDMILL SITE: LAND ACQUISITION .......................................... ...................... 900 ∂900

SCHOFIELD BARRACKS: BARRACKS COMPLEX (WILSON STREET)

(PHASE I–C) ........................................................................................ 23,000 23,000 ......................

WHEELER ARMY AIRFIELD: BARRACKS COMPLEX (AVIATION) (PHASE

VI–A) ................................................................................................... 50,000 50,000 ......................

NAVY:

CAMP SMITH: CINCPAC HEADQUARTERS (PHASE III) .............................. 37,580 37,580 ......................

KANEOHE BAY MARINE CORPS BASE: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................................................................... 24,920 24,920 ......................

LUALUALEI NAVAL MAGAZINE: SHORE POWER AT WHARVES .................. 6,000 6,000 ......................

PEARL HARBOR NAVAL COMPLEX:

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 17,300 17,300 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 23,300 23,300 ......................

DRYDOCK SUPPORT FACILITY ......................................................... 7,900 7,900 ......................

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS .................... 12,100 12,100 ......................

SEWER FORCE MAIN ...................................................................... 16,900 16,900 ......................

FORD ISLAND WATER LINE REPLACEMENT .................................... ...................... 14,100 ∂14,100

DEFENSE-WIDE: HICKAM AFB: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ................... 29,200 29,200 ......................

TOTAL, HAWAII .................................................................................... 265,100 281,600 ∂16,500

IDAHO

AIR FORCE: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB: REPLACE AIRCRAFT PARKING APRON ..... 14,600 14,600 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: GOWEN FIELD: READINESS CENTER ........................ 8,117 8,117 ......................

TOTAL, IDAHO ...................................................................................... 22,717 22,717 ......................

ILLINOIS

ARMY: ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL: CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ...................... ...................... 3,500 ∂3,500

NAVY:

GREAT LAKES NAVAL TRAINING CENTER:

RECRUIT BARRACKS ....................................................................... 41,130 41,130 ......................

RECRUIT BARRACKS ....................................................................... 41,130 41,130 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: GREAT LAKES: RESERVE CENTER RENOVATION .................... 4,426 4,426 ......................

TOTAL, ILLINOIS .................................................................................. 86,686 90,186 ∂3,500

INDIANA

ARMY: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE IV) ........................................................................... 66,000 ...................... ¥66,000

NAVY: CRANE NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER: SPECIAL WARFARE MUNITIONS ENGINEERING FACILITY ..................................................................... 5,820 5,820 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: NEWPORT ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE IV) ................................................................ ...................... 66,000 ∂66,000

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP ATTERBURY: BATTLE SIMULATION CENTER ... ...................... 4,947 ∂4,947

AIR FORCE RESERVE: GRISSOM ARB: SERVICES COMPLEX (PHASE III) ......... 13,200 13,200 ......................

TOTAL, INDIANA ................................................................................... 85,020 89,967 ∂4,947

IOWA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: ESTHERVILLE: READINESS CENTER ......................... 2,713 2,713 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

SIOUX GATEWAY AIRPORT:

KC–135 PARKING APRON/HYDRANT REFUELING SYSTEM .............. 14,400 14,400 ......................

KC–135 FUEL CELL/CORROSION CONTROL HANGAR ..................... 8,300 8,300 ......................

KC–135 EXTEND AND UPGRADE TAXIWAY ..................................... 4,300 4,300 ......................

TOTAL, IOWA ....................................................................................... 29,713 29,713 ......................
42

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

KANSAS

ARMY:

FORT RILEY:

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 6,800 6,800 ......................

MODIFIED RECORD FIRE RANGE .................................................... 4,100 4,100 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT RILEY: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP ............................................................................................................ 645 645 ......................

TOTAL, KANSAS ................................................................................... 11,545 11,545 ......................

KENTUCKY

ARMY:

BLUE GRASS ARMY DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY

(PHASE II) ........................................................................................... 3,000 ...................... ¥3,000

FORT CAMPBELL:

BARRACKS COMPLEX (MARKET GARDEN ROAD) (PHASE III) ......... 47,000 47,000 ......................

DEPLOYMENT STAGING COMPLEX .................................................. 3,300 3,300 ......................

DEPLOYMENT STAGING COMPLEX/AIR ............................................ 3,300 3,300 ......................

DEPLOYMENT STAGING COMPLEX/RAIL .......................................... 3,300 3,300 ......................

ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION ............................................................... 10,000 10,000 ......................

EXPAND KEYHOLE HARDSTAND AREA ............................................ 10,600 10,600 ......................

PASSENGER PROCESSING FACILITY ............................................... 11,400 11,400 ......................

FORT KNOX: RANGE MULTI-PURPOSE DIGITAL TANK (PHASE IV) WILCOX

RANGE ................................................................................................. ...................... 12,000 ∂12,000

DEFENSE-WIDE: BLUEGRASS ARMY DEPOT: AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION

FACILITY (PHASE II) ..................................................................................... ...................... 3,000 ∂3,000

ARMY RESERVE: FORT KNOX: RESERVE CENTER ............................................ 14,846 14,846 ......................

TOTAL, KENTUCKY ............................................................................... 106,746 118,746 ∂12,000

LOUISIANA

ARMY:

FORT POLK:

EDUCATION CENTER ....................................................................... 10,800 10,800 ......................

READINESS AND OPERATIONS FACILITY ......................................... 10,400 10,400 ......................

AIR FORCE: BARKSDALE AFB: CONTROL TOWER ............................................. ...................... 5,000 ∂5,000

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

CAMP BEAUREGARD: READINESS CENTER .............................................. 5,392 5,392 ......................

CARVILLE: READINESS CENTER ............................................................... 5,677 5,677 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: NEW ORLEANS: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT

EQUIPMENT FACILITY ................................................................................... ...................... 5,500 ∂5,500

NAVY RESERVE: LAFAYETTE: MARINE RESERVE TRAINING CENTER ................ 5,200 5,200 ......................

NEW ORLEANS NAVAL AIR STATION:

EQUIPMENT SHOP AND HOLDING SHELTER .................................... 2,270 2,270 ......................

JOINT RESERVE CENTER (PHASE II) ............................................... ...................... ...................... ......................

REFUELER MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................ 650 650 ......................

REPLACE BRIDGES ......................................................................... 1,300 1,300 ......................

TOTAL, LOUISIANA ...................................................................... 41,689 52,189 ∂10,500

MAINE

NAVY:

BRUNSWICK NAVAL AIR STATION:

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR ................................................. 41,665 41,665 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 22,630 22,630 ......................

P–3 SUPPORT FACILITY .................................................................. 3,100 3,100 ......................

KITTTERY-PORTSMOUTH NAVAL STATION: BACHELOR HOUSING ............. ...................... 14,620 ∂14,620

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: BANGOR: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY

(PHASE I) ..................................................................................................... 11,618 11,618 ......................

TOTAL, MAINE ..................................................................................... 79,013 93,633 ∂14,620
43

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

MARYLAND

ARMY:

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE IV) .................. 66,500 ...................... ¥66,500

AMMUNITION SURVEILLANCE FACILITY ........................................... 5,300 5,300 ......................

CLIMATIC TEST FACILITY ................................................................ 9,000 9,000 ......................

EDGEWOOD: CHEMISTRY LABORATORY ................................................... 44,000 44,000 ......................

FORT MEADE:

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 5,800 5,800 ......................

OPERATIONS FACILITY (55TH SIGNAL COMPANY) .......................... ...................... 5,400 ∂5,400

NAVY:

INDIAN HEAD NAVAL EXPLOSIVE ORDANCE CENTER: JOINT EOD EQUIPMENT MAGNETIC EVALUATION FACILITY ............................................. 1,250 1,250 ......................

PATUXENT RIVER NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER:

ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTEGRATION FACILITY (PHASE VI) .............. 10,770 10,770 ......................

RANGES OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY ...................................... 2,260 2,260 ......................

AIR FORCE:

ANDREWS AFB:

CONSOLIDATE SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY .......................... 10,070 10,070 ......................

REPAIR EAST RUNWAY ................................................................... 7,600 7,600 ......................

UPGRADE FIRE TRAINING FACILITY ................................................ 1,750 1,750 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND:

AMMUNITION DEMILITARIZATION FACILITY (PHASE IV) .................. ...................... 66,500 ∂66,500

OPERATIONAL TRAINING FACILITY .................................................. 3,200 3,200 ......................

ANDREWS AFB:

ADD/ALTER MEDICAL CLINIC .......................................................... 7,300 7,300 ......................

BRANCH MEDICAL/DENTAL CLINIC RELOCATION ............................ 2,950 2,950 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: SALISBURY: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP ............................................................................................................ 2,314 2,314 ......................

TOTAL, MARYLAND .............................................................................. 180,064 185,464 ∂5,400

MASSACHUSETTS

AIR FORCE: HANSCOM AFB: RENOVATE ACQUISITION MGMT FACILITY (PHASE

III) ................................................................................................................ 9,400 9,400 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FRAMINGHAM: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE

SHOP ............................................................................................................ 8,347 8,347 ......................

TOTAL, MASSACHUSETTS .................................................................... 17,747 17,747 ......................

MICHIGAN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

LANSING: COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP (PHASE II) ........... 5,809 5,809 ......................

AUGUSTA/BATTLE CREEK: TASS BARRACKS ............................................ ...................... 13,318 ∂13,318

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

SELFRIDGE ANGB: RUNWAY CLEAR ZONE LAND ACQUISITION ............... 2,000 2,000 ......................

BATTLE CREEK: MUNITIONS AND MAINTENANCE STORAGE COMPLEX .... ...................... 9,500 ∂9,500

NAVY RESERVE: SELFRIDGE ANGB: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ............ 1,490 1,490 ......................

TOTAL, MICHIGAN ................................................................................ 9,299 32,117 ∂22,818

MINNESOTA

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: DULUTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: COMPOSITE AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE COMPLEX (PHASE I) ................................................. ...................... 10,000 ∂10,000

NAVY RESERVE: DULUTH: RESERVE CENTER ADDITION .................................. 2,980 2,980 ......................

TOTAL, MINNESOTA ............................................................................. 2,980 12,980 ∂10,000
44

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

MISSISSIPPI

NAVY:

GULFPORT NAVAL CONSTRUCTION BATTALION CENTER:

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 14,300 14,300 ......................

MOBILIZATION OPERATIONS FACILITY ............................................ 7,360 7,360 ......................

PASCAGOULA: FLEET OPERATIONS BUILDING .......................................... ...................... 4,680 ∂4,680

MERDIAN NAVAL AIR STATION: T–45 SUPPORT FACILITY ....................... ...................... 3,370 ∂3,370

AIR FORCE:

REPLACE TECHNICAL TRAINING FACILITY (PHASE II–A) ......................... 28,600 28,600 ......................

COLUMBUS AFB: RADAR APPROACH CONTROL CENTER ......................... ...................... 5,000 ∂5,000

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

CAMP SHELBY: MILITARY EDUCATION CENTER (PHASE II) ..................... 11,444 11,444 ......................

GULFPORT: READINESS CENTER ............................................................. 9,145 9,145 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

JACKSON IAP:

C–17 FACILITY CONVERSION ......................................................... 16,500 16,500 ......................

UPGRADE CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY .................................... 5,700 5,700 ......................

AIR FORCE RESERVE: KEESLER AFB: C–130J MAINTENANCE HANGAR ........... 12,000 12,000 ......................

TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI ............................................................................. 105,049 118,099 ∂13,050

MISSOURI

ARMY:

FORT LEONARD WOOD:

BASIC COMBAT TRAINING COMPLEX (PHASE II) ............................ 27,000 27,000 ......................

NIGHT FIRE RANGE ......................................................................... 4,300 4,300 ......................

RECORD FIRE RANGE ..................................................................... 3,550 3,550 ......................

NAVY: KANSAS CITY MARINE CORPS SUPPORT ACTIVITY: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ....................................................................................... 9,010 9,010 ......................

TOTAL, MISSOURI ................................................................................ 43,860 43,860 ......................

MONTANA

AIR FORCE: MALMSTROM AFB: CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................... ...................... 4,650 ∂4,650

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: KALISPELL: READINESS CENTER .............................. 822 822 ......................

TOTAL, MONTANA ................................................................................ 822 5,472 ∂4,650

NEBRASKA

AIR FORCE: OFFUTT AFB: FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION ................................ ...................... 10,400 ∂10,400

TOTAL, NEBRASKA ............................................................................... ...................... 10,400 ∂10,400

NEVADA

NAVY: FALLON NAS: WATER TREATMENT FACILITY .......................................... ...................... 6,150 ∂6,150

AIR FORCE:

NELLIS AFB:

DYNAMIC BATTLE CONTROL CENTER ............................................. 12,600 12,600 ......................

LAND ACQUISITION ......................................................................... ...................... 19,000 ∂19,000

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: RENO-TAHOE IAP: REPLACE BASE SUPPLY WAREHOUSE COMPLEX ......................................................................................... 8,500 8,500 ......................

TOTAL, NEVADA ................................................................................... 21,100 46,250 ∂25,150

NEW HAMPSHIRE

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

CONCORD:

ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ............................................... 27,185 27,185 ......................

READINESS CENTER ....................................................................... 1,868 1,868 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: PEASE AFB: KC–135R SIMULATOR TRAINING FACILITY ................................................................................................................ 2,200 2,200 ......................
45

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

ARMY RESERVE: ROCHESTER: RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................................................................ 9,122 9,122 ......................

TOTAL, NEW HAMPSHIRE .................................................................... 40,375 40,375 ......................

NEW JERSEY

ARMY: FORT MONMOUTH: BARRACKS .............................................................. 20,000 20,000 ......................

NAVY: EARLE NAS: EXPLOSIVE TRUCK HOLDING YARDS (3) ........................... ...................... 4,370 ∂4,370

AIR FORCE:

C–17 ADD/ALTER FUEL CELL .................................................................. 1,050 1,050 ......................

C–17 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT ......................................................... 1,400 1,400 ......................

C–17 FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY ......................................................... 4,900 4,900 ......................

C–17 MAINTENANCE HANGAR ................................................................. 27,700 27,700 ......................

C–17 THREE BAY HANGAR ..................................................................... 1,500 1,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: MCGUIRE AFB: BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK ........................... 4,400 4,400 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

ATLANTIC CITY IAP: COMMUNICATIONS/SECURITY FORCES COMPLEX ... 6,300 6,300 ......................

MCGUIRE AFB: REPLACE JOINT MEDICAL TRAINING FACILITY ................ 4,900 4,900 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: FORT DIX: BARRACKS MODERNIZATION ................................ 12,000 12,000 ......................

TOTAL, NEW JERSEY ........................................................................... 84,150 88,520 ∂4,370

NEW MEXICO

ARMY: WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER .............................................................................................................. ...................... 7,600 ∂7,600

AIR FORCE:

CANNON AFB: REPLACE FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION ......................... 9,400 9,400 ......................

KIRTLAND AFB: TELESCOPE/ATMOSPHERE COMPENSATION LABORATORY ................................................................................................... 15,500 15,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: HOLLOMAN AFB: MEDICAL CLINIC ALTERATION ..................... 5,700 5,700 ......................

TOTAL, NEW MEXICO ........................................................................... 30,600 38,200 ∂7,600

NEW YORK

ARMY:

FORT DRUM:

BATTLE SIMULATION CENTER (PHASE II) ....................................... 9,000 9,000 ......................

FIELD OPERATIONS FACILITY .......................................................... 2,150 2,150 ......................

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE FACILITY .................................. 4,700 4,700 ......................

TACTICAL EQUIPMENT SHOPS ........................................................ 31,000 31,000 ......................

U.S. MILITARY ACADEMY: CADET PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER

(PHASE II) ........................................................................................... 37,900 37,900 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT DRUM: MANEUVER AREA TRAINING EQUIPMENT SITE (PHASE I) ................................................................................... 17,000 17,000 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT: COMPOSITE SUPPORT COMPLEX ........ 19,000 19,000 ......................

NIAGARA FALLS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: FUEL CELL/CORROSION

HANGAR ADDITION .............................................................................. ...................... 2,800 ∂2,800

TOTAL, NEW YORK .......................................................................... 120,750 123,550 ∂2,800

NORTH CAROLINA

ARMY:

FORT BRAGG:

BARRACKS COMPLEX (BUTNER ROAD) (PHASE II) ......................... 49,000 49,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX (LONGSTREET ROAD) (PHASE II) ................. 27,000 27,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX (TAGAYTAY ROAD) (PHASE II–C) ................. 17,500 17,500 ......................

PARACHUTE TEAM GENERAL PURPOSE BUILDING ......................... 7,700 7,700 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 13,600 13,600 ......................

SUNNY POINT MILITARY OCEAN TERMINAL:

DEPLOYMENT STAGING AREA ......................................................... 2,000 2,000 ......................

FIRE STATION ................................................................................. 2,750 2,750 ......................
46

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

OPEN STORAGE AREA ..................................................................... 2,050 2,050 ......................

ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND TRUCK PAD ........................................ 4,600 4,600 ......................

NAVY:

CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS BASE:

ACADEMIC BUILDING ...................................................................... 15,860 15,860 ......................

AMMUNITION STORAGE MAGAZINE UPGRADE (PHASE I) ................ 5,880 5,880 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 16,530 16,530 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 13,550 13,550 ......................

ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SHOP ............................ 6,960 6,960 ......................

LANDFILL CELL ............................................................................... 8,290 8,290 ......................

NEW RIVER MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:

PROPERTY CONTROL FACILITY ....................................................... 1,560 1,560 ......................

PROPERTY CONTROL FACILITY ....................................................... 2,490 2,490 ......................

AIR FORCE: POPE AFB: CONSOLIDATE C–130 CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY ................................................................................................................ 17,800 17,800 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

CAMP LEJEUNE MARINE CORPS BASE: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION

AND RENOVATION ............................................................................... 8,857 8,857 ......................

FORT BRAGG:

IMAGERY AND ANALYSIS FACILITY ................................................. 3,150 3,150 ......................

LANGUAGE SUSTAINMENT TRAINING FACILITY ............................... 2,100 2,100 ......................

REPAIR TRAINING FACILITY ............................................................ 1,812 1,812 ......................

TEAM OPERATIONS/INFORMATION AUTOMATION FACILITY .............. 5,800 5,800 ......................

TRAINING FACILITY ......................................................................... 5,000 5,000 ......................

TRAINING RANGE ............................................................................ 2,600 2,600 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX ................................................. 3,600 3,600 ......................

WEATHER OPERATIONS FACILITY .................................................... 1,000 1,000 ......................

BATTALION OPERATIONS/VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ........... 8,500 8,500 ......................

POPE AFB: BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK ................................................... 3,400 3,400 ......................

TOTAL, NORTH CAROLINA ................................................................... 260,939 260,939 ......................

NORTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: GRAND FORKS AFB: KC–135 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT

MAINT UNIT .................................................................................................. 7,800 7,800 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

GRAND FORKS AFB: HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ......................................... 9,110 9,110 ......................

MINOT AFB: HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM ...................................................... 14,000 14,000 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: FARGO/HECTOR: WEAPONS RELEASE SYSTEMS

SHOP ............................................................................................................ ...................... 5,000 ∂5,000

TOTAL, NORTH DAKOTA ....................................................................... 30,910 35,910 ∂5,000

OHIO

AIR FORCE:

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB:

ADD/ALTER SPECIAL OPERATIONS INTELLIGENCE FACILITY ........... 3,450 3,450 ......................

CONSOLIDATE ACQ MANAGEMENT COMPLEX (PHASE IV–B) .......... 21,400 21,400 ......................

SECURITY GATE,BASE ENTRANCE .................................................. ...................... 3,400 ∂3,400

CINCINNATI: READINESS CENTER ............................................................ 9,780 9,780 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: CLEVELAND: LAND ACQUISITION ........................................... 1,200 1,200 ......................

TOTAL, OHIO ........................................................................................ 35,830 39,230 ∂3,400

OKLAHOMA

ARMY: FORT SILL: DEPLOYMENT STAGING COMPLEX ...................................... 5,100 5,100 ......................

AIR FORCE:

ALTUS AFB:

REPAIR AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS (PHASE I) ....................................... 20,200 20,200 ......................

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 10,200 10,200 ......................

DEPOT PLATING SHOP .................................................................... ...................... 11,200 ∂11,200
47

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

VANCE AFB: ROAD REPAIR (ELAM ROAD) ............................................... ...................... 4,809 ∂4,809

TOTAL, OKLAHOMA .............................................................................. 35,500 51,509 ∂16,009

OREGON

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: EUGENE: JOINT ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER

(PH I) ........................................................................................................... ...................... 8,300 ∂8,300

PENNSYLVANIA

DEFENSE-WIDE:

NEW CUMBERLAND DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT: SPECIAL PURPOSE

WAREHOUSE ........................................................................................ 19,900 19,900 ......................

PHILADELPHIA DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER: CONSOLIDATE INDOOR FITNESS FACILITIES ................................................................................. 2,429 2,429 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

PITTSBURGH IAP:

REPLACE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX ................................. 3,200 3,200 ......................

SQUADRON OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT FACILITY (171ST AIR REFUELING SQDN) .......................................................................... ...................... 7,700 ∂7,700

NAVY RESERVE: WILLOW GROVE: HANGAR FIRE PROTECTION UPGRADES ...... 3,715 3,715 ......................

TOTAL, PENNSYLVANIA ........................................................................ 29,244 36,944 ∂7,700

RHODE ISLAND

NAVY:

NEWPORT NAVAL STATION:

SPECIAL WARFARE OFFICERS INSTRUCTION BUILDING .................. 15,290 15,290 ......................

LAB-UNMANNED UNDERSEA COMBAT VEHICLE ............................. ...................... 9,370 ∂9,370

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: QUONSET STATE AIRPORT: C–130J REPLACE COMPOSITE MAINTENANCE SHOPS ..................................................................... 9,600 9,600 ......................

TOTAL, RHODE ISLAND ........................................................................ 24,890 34,260 ∂9,370

SOUTH CAROLINA

ARMY: FORT JACKSON: BASIC COMBAT TRAINEE COMPLEX (PHASE I) ........... 26,000 26,000 ......................

NAVY:

BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION:

AIRBORNE WEAPONS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT WAREHOUSE ............. 1,960 1,960 ......................

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 6,060 6,060 ......................

PARRIS ISLAND MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT: MILITARY POLICE

AND EMERGENCY SERVICES FACILITY ................................................ 5,430 5,430 ......................

AIR FORCE: SHAW AFB: EDUCATION CENTER .................................................. ...................... 5,800 ∂5,800

DEFENSE-WIDE: BEAUFORT MARINE CORPS AIR STATION: REPLACE LAUREL

BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL .......................................................................... 12,850 12,850 ......................

TOTAL, SOUTH CAROLINA .................................................................... 52,300 58,100 ∂5,800

SOUTH DAKOTA

AIR FORCE: ELLSWORTH AFB: LIVE ORDNANCE LOADING AREA ...................... ...................... 12,200 ∂12,200

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

MITCHELL: COMBINED SUPPORT MAINTENANCE SHOP ........................... 14,228 14,228 ......................

JOE FOSS FIELD/SOUIX CITY: RUNWAY/TAXIWAY IMPROVEMENT ............ ...................... 6,500 ∂6,500

TOTAL, SOUTH DAKOTA ....................................................................... 14,228 32,928 ∂18,700

TENNESSEE

NAVY: MILLINGTON NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: ELEVATED WATER TANK ........ 3,900 3,900 ......................

AIR FORCE:

ARNOLD AFB:

CONVERT TO HYPERSONIC PLANT .................................................. 10,400 10,400 ......................

UPGRADE JET ENGINE AIR INDUCTION SYSTEM (PHASE IV) .......... 14,000 14,000 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

ALCOA: READINESS CENTER ................................................................... 8,203 8,203 ......................
48

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

HENDERSON: OPERATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP .................................. 2,012 2,012 ......................

TOTAL, TENNESSEE ............................................................................. 38,515 38,515 ......................

TEXAS

ARMY:

FORT HOOD:

BARRACKS COMPLEX ..................................................................... 41,000 41,000 ......................

COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY (PHASE II) ............................. 10,000 10,000 ......................

MULTI-PURPOSE DIGITAL TRAINING RANGE (PHASE II) ................. 13,000 13,000 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 12,200 12,200 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 23,000 23,000 ......................

FORT SAM HOUSTON: GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ....................... 2,250 2,250 ......................

NAVY: KINGSVILLE NAS: AIRFIELD LIGHTING .................................................... ...................... 6,160 ∂6,160

AIR FORCE:

LACKLAND AFB:

JOINT ADVANCED LANGUAGE TRAINING CENTER ........................... 4,200 4,200 ......................

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 8,600 8,600 ......................

LAUGHLIN AFB: ADD/ALTER FITNESS CENTER ......................................... 12,000 12,000 ......................

SHEPPARD AFB:

REPLACE STUDENT DORMITORY/DINING FACILITY ......................... 16,000 16,000 ......................

STUDENT DORMITORY/DINING FACILITY ......................................... 21,000 21,000 ......................

DYESS AFB: C–130 SQUADRON OPERATIONS FACILITY .......................... ...................... 16,800 ∂16,800

DEFENSE-WIDE:

DYESS AFB: MEDICAL TREATMENT FACILITY ALTERATION ...................... 3,300 3,300 ......................

FORT HOOD: ADD/ALTER HOSPITAL ......................................................... 12,200 12,200 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: AUSTIN: ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY ........... 25,659 25,659 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP MABRY: REPLACE WEATHER FLIGHT COMPLEX ............................................................................................................. 900 900 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: RED RIVER ARMY DEPOT: RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ....................................................................... 1,862 1,862 ......................

TOTAL, TEXAS ...................................................................................... 207,171 230,131 ∂22,960

UTAH

AIR FORCE:

HILL AFB:

CONSOLIDATE HYDRAULIC/PNEUDRAULIC REPAIR FACILITY .......... 14,000 14,000 ......................

DEPOT MAINTENANCE HANGAR (PHASE I) ..................................... ...................... 8,000 ∂8,000

TOTAL, UTAH .............................................................................. 14,000 22,000 ∂8,000

VIRGINIA

ARMY:

FORT BELVOIR:

CHAPEL ........................................................................................... 4,950 4,950 ......................

OPERATIONS BUILDING ................................................................... 31,000 31,000 ......................

FORT EUSTIS:

FIELD OPERATIONS FACILITY .......................................................... 1,750 1,750 ......................

MAIN PIER ...................................................................................... 23,000 23,000 ......................

ACCESS ROAD ................................................................................ ...................... 9,900 ∂9,900

FORT LEE:

AIRBORNE TRAINING FACILITY ....................................................... 17,500 17,500 ......................

MILITARY ENTRANCE PROCESSING STATION .................................. 6,400 6,400 ......................

NAVY:

NORFOLK NAVAL STATION:

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR REPLACEMENT ......................... 11,300 11,300 ......................

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR REPLACEMENT ......................... 14,100 14,100 ......................

AIRFIELD PAVEMENT UPGRADE ...................................................... 6,360 6,360 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS MODERNIZATION ........................ 14,730 14,730 ......................

DEPERMING PIER REPLACEMENT ................................................... 2,810 2,810 ......................

PIER REPLACEMENT (PHASE I) ...................................................... 28,210 28,210 ......................
49

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

WATERFRONT ELECTRICAL UPGRADE ............................................. 15,620 15,620 ......................

WATERFRONT ELECTRICAL UPGRADE ............................................. 12,900 12,900 ......................

QUANTICO MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND:

AIRCRAFT FIRE AND RESCUE STATION .......................................... 3,790 3,790 ......................

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS ................................................... 9,390 9,390 ......................

AIR FORCE:

LANGLEY AFB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 8,300 8,300 ......................

F–22 LOW OBSERVABLE/COMPOSITE REPAIR FACILITY ................. 16,000 16,000 ......................

F–22 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY ........................... 19,000 19,000 ......................

F–22 UPGRADE FLIGHTLINE INFRASTRUCTURE .............................. 4,000 4,000 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

FORT BELVOIR: ADDITIONAL CHILLER UNIT ............................................ 900 900 ......................

NORFOLK: ADD/ALTER BRANCH MEDICAL CLINIC ................................... 21,000 21,000 ......................

PENTAGON: PHYSICAL FITNESS AND READINESS FACILITY ..................... 25,000 25,000 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: FORT PICKETT: MANEUVER AND EQUIPMENT

TRAINING SITE ............................................................................................. ...................... 10,700 ∂10,700

NAVY RESERVE: WILLIAMSBURG: HEADQUARTERS BUILDING .......................... 2,130 2,130 ......................

TOTAL, VIRGINIA .................................................................................. 300,140 320,740 ∂20,600

VERMONT

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: BURLINGTON: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX ....... ...................... 5,600 ∂5,600

WASHINGTON

ARMY:

FORT LEWIS:

AMMUNITION SUPPLY POINT EXPANSION ....................................... 17,000 17,000 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX (17TH AND B STREET) (PHASE I) ................ 48,000 48,000 ......................

COMBAT VEHICLE TRAIL ................................................................. 7,300 7,300 ......................

DEPLOYMENT STAGING COMPLEX .................................................. 15,500 15,500 ......................

DEPLOYMENT STAGING COMPLEX/RAIL .......................................... 16,500 16,500 ......................

PALLET HANDING FACILITY ............................................................. 13,200 13,200 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 9,100 9,100 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 9,600 9,600 ......................

NAVY:

BANGOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS FACILITY: UTILITIES AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................................... 3,900 3,900 ......................

BREMERTON NAVAL STATION: REPLACE PIER DELTA (PHASE II) ............ 24,460 24,460 ......................

EVERETT NAVAL STATION: SHORE INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ....................................................................................................... 6,820 6,820 ......................

WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR STATION:

P–3 SUPPORT FACILITY .................................................................. 3,470 3,470 ......................

CONTROL TOWER ............................................................................ ...................... 3,900 ∂3,900

AIR FORCE:

FAIRCHILD AFB: REPLACE MUNITIONS MAINTENANCE ADMIN FACILITY ....................................................................................................... 2,800 2,800 ......................

MCCHORD AFB:

ADD/ALTER MISSION SUPPORT CENTER (PHASE I) ........................ 15,800 15,800 ......................

C–17 EXTEND NOSE DOCKS .......................................................... 4,900 4,900 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

FORT LEWIS:

LANGUAGE SUSTAINMENT TRAINING FACILITY ............................... 1,100 1,100 ......................

TACTICAL EQUIPMENT COMPLEX .................................................... 5,800 5,800 ......................

WHIDBEY ISLAND NAVAL AIR STATION: AIRCREW WATER SURVIVAL

TRAINING FACILITY .............................................................................. 6,600 6,600 ......................

ARMY RESERVE: FORT LEWIS: RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP ................................................................................................ 21,978 21,978 ......................

TOTAL, WASHINGTON ........................................................................... 233,828 237,728 ∂3,900
50

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

WEST VIRGINIA

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: WILLIAMSTOWN: READINESS CENTER ...................... ...................... 6,433 ∂6,433

GLEN JEAN:

ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATION MAINTENANCE

SHOP ................................................................................................... ...................... 21,389 ∂21,389

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: YEAGER AIR BASE: CIVIL ENGINEER/WEAPONS COMPLEX ............................................................................................................. ...................... 4,100 ∂4,100

TOTAL, WEST VIRGINIA ........................................................................ ...................... 31,922 ∂31,922

WISCONSIN

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD: OSHKOSH: ORGANIZATIONAL MAINTENANCE SHOP .. 5,274 5,274 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: CAMP DOUGLAS/VOLK FIELD: CONTROL TOWER ......... ...................... 5,700 ∂5,700

TOTAL, WISCONSIN .............................................................................. 5,274 10,974 ∂5,700

WYOMING

AIR FORCE: F.E. WARREN AFB: FITNESS CENTER ............................................ 10,200 10,200 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: F. E. WARREN AFB: MEDICAL CLINIC ALTERATION ................ 2,700 2,700 ......................

NAVY RESERVE: CHEYENNE: RESERVE CENTER ADDITION .............................. 1,060 1,060 ......................

TOTAL, WYOMING ................................................................................ 13,960 13,960 ......................

EL SALVADOR

DEFENSE-WIDE: COMALAPA AB: FORWARD OPERATING LOCATION .................. 12,577 12,577 ......................

GERMANY

ARMY:

BAMBERG:

BARRACKS COMPLEX (WARNER’S 3) ............................................. 20,000 20,000 ......................

PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER ........................................... 16,000 16,000 ......................

BAUMHOLDER: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................... 9,000 9,000 ......................

DARMSTADT:

BARRACKS COMPLEX (CAMBRAI FRITSCH 4028) ........................... 6,700 6,700 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX (KELLEY 4163) ............................................ 6,800 6,800 ......................

HANAU: BARRACKS COMPLEX (PIONEER 8) ............................................ 7,200 7,200 ......................

HEIDELBERG:

BARRACKS COMPLEX (PATTON 114) .............................................. 6,800 6,800 ......................

BARRACKS COMPLEX (TOMPKINS 4253) ........................................ 8,500 8,500 ......................

MANNHEIM: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ........................................ 16,000 16,000 ......................

WEISBADEN:

CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ....................................................... 6,800 6,800 ......................

PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER ........................................... 19,500 19,500 ......................

AIR FORCE:

RAMSTEIN AB:

COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS SQUADRON COMPLEX (PHASE I) ....... 15,000 15,000 ......................

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 11,000 11,000 ......................

FREIGHT TERMINAL AND DEFENSE COURIER SERVICE .................. 9,400 9,400 ......................

STRATEGIC LIFT AREA EXPANSION ................................................. 4,600 4,600 ......................

UPGRADE UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................. 2,900 2,900 ......................

SPANGDAHLEM AB:

NORTHWEST INFRASTRUCTURE EXPANSION ................................... 6,200 6,200 ......................

REFUELER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................. 2,500 2,500 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE:

GEILENKIRCHEN: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MULTI PURPOSE ROOM ........... 1,733 1,733 ......................

HEIDELBERG:

HOSPITAL ADDITION/CLINIC ALTERATION ....................................... 28,000 28,000 ......................

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION/RENOVATION ......... 3,312 3,312 ......................

KAISERLAUTERN: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ............ 1,439 1,439 ......................

KITZINGEN: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ..................... 1,394 1,394 ......................

LANDSTUHL: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/MIDDLE SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ................................................................................................. 1,444 1,444 ......................
51

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

RAMSTEIN: HIGH SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION .................................. 2,814 2,814 ......................

VOGELWEH: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION/RENOVATION .................................................................................................... 1,558 1,558 ......................

WEISBADEN: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ................... 1,378 1,378 ......................

WUERZBURG: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM/GYMNASIUM ADDITION .................................................................................................... 2,684 2,684 ......................

TOTAL, GERMANY ........................................................................... 220,656 220,656 ......................

GREECE

NAVY:

LARISSA NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS .. 12,240 12,240 ......................

SOUDA BAY NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY: SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

ADDITION ............................................................................................. 3,210 3,210 ......................

TOTAL, GREECE .............................................................................. 15,450 15,450 ......................

GREENLAND

AIR FORCE: THULE AB: REPLACE TAXIWAYS/APRONS ...................................... 19,000 ...................... ¥19,000

DEFENSE-WIDE: THULE AB: COMPOSITE MEDICAL FACILITY REPLACEMENT ... 10,800 10,800 ......................

TOTAL, GREENLAND ............................................................................ 29,800 10,800 ¥19,000

GUAM

NAVY:

GUAM NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY:

BACHELOR ENLISTED QUARTERS MODERNIZATION ........................ 9,300 9,300 ......................

WATERFRONT UTILITIES UPGRADE ................................................. 14,800 14,800 ......................

AIR FORCE:

ANDERSEN AFB:

WAR RESERVE MATERIAL STORAGE FACILITY ................................ 4,550 4,550 ......................

REPLACE SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS FACILITY ..................... 5,600 5,600 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: ANDERSEN AFB: REPLACE HYDRANT FUEL SYSTEM .............. 20,000 20,000 ......................

AIR NATIONAL GUARD: ANDERSON AFB: OPERATIONS AND TRAINING FACILITY ................................................................................................................ 4,300 4,300 ......................

TOTAL, GUAM ...................................................................................... 58,550 58,550 ......................

ICELAND

NAVY: KEFLAVIK NAVAL AIR STATION: SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL CONNECTION

CHARGE ....................................................................................................... 2,820 2,820 ......................

ITALY

NAVY: SIGONELLA NAVAL AIR STATION: P–3 SUPPORT FACILITY .................... 3,060 3,060 ......................

AIR FORCE:

AVIANO AB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 8,200 8,200 ......................

INDOOR FIRING RANGE .................................................................. 3,600 3,600 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: AVIANO AB: ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASSROOM ADDITION ... 3,647 3,647 ......................

TOTAL, ITALY ....................................................................................... 18,507 18,507 ......................

JAPAN

DEFENSE-WIDE: YOKOTA AB: BULK FUEL STORAGE TANK ............................... 13,000 13,000 ......................

KOREA

ARMY:

CAMP CARROLL:

ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM .............................................. 8,000 8,000 ......................

PHYSICAL FITNESS TRAINING CENTER ........................................... 8,593 8,593 ......................

CAMP CASEY: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY .................................... 8,500 8,500 ......................

CAMP HOVEY:

BARRACKS COMPLEX ..................................................................... 33,000 33,000 ......................
52

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM ............................................................. 2,750 2,750 ......................

CAMP HUMPHREYS: BARRACKS COMPLEX .............................................. 14,500 14,500 ......................

CAMP JACKSON: GENERAL INSTRUCTION BUILDING ............................... 6,100 6,100 ......................

CAMP STANLEY: BARRACKS COMPLEX .................................................... 28,000 28,000 ......................

AIR FORCE:

KUNSAN AB: ADD/ALTER FITNESS CENTER ............................................. 12,000 12,000 ......................

OSAN AB:

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 14,400 14,400 ......................

DORMITORY .................................................................................... 15,800 15,800 ......................

OFFICER DORMITORY ..................................................................... 9,700 9,700 ......................

REPLACE BASE CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLEX ................................... 36,000 ...................... ¥36,000

REPLACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FACILITY .................................... 5,925 5,925 ......................

REPLACE VEHICLE OPERATIONS/ADMINISTRATION FACILITY .......... 2,000 2,000 ......................

VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................... 17,317 17,317 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: CAMP CASEY: REPLACE FUEL STORAGE FACILITY ................. 5,500 5,500 ......................

TOTAL, KOREA ..................................................................................... 228,085 192,085 ¥36,000

KWAJALEIN

ARMY: KWAJALEIN ATOLL: COLD STORAGE WAREHOUSE ................................. 11,000 11,000 ......................

OMAN

AIR FORCE: MASIRAH ISLAND: AIRFIELD REPAIRS (PHASE II) ......................... ...................... 8,000 ∂8,000

PORTUGAL

DEFENSE-WIDE: LAJES FIELD: DENTAL CLINIC REPLACEMENT ........................ 3,750 3,750 ......................

AMERICAN SAMOA

ARMY RESERVE: AMERICAN SAMOA: RESERVE CENTER/ORGANIZATIONAL

MAINTENANCE SHOP .................................................................................... 19,703 19,703 ......................

SPAIN

NAVY: ROTA NAVAL STATION: AIRCRAFT FIRE AND RESCUE ADDITION ........... 2,240 2,240 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: ROTA NAVAL STATION: MARINE LOADING ARMS .................... 3,000 3,000 ......................

TOTAL, SPAIN ...................................................................................... 5,240 5,240 ......................

TURKEY

AIR FORCE: ESKISEHIR: DORMITORY/MISSION SUPPORT FACILITY .................. 4,000 4,000 ......................

UNITED KINGDOM

AIR FORCE:

RAF MILDENHALL:

AVIONICS MAINTENANCE COMPLEX (PHASE II) .............................. 10,800 10,800 ......................

FITNESS CENTER ............................................................................ 11,600 11,600 ......................

RAF LAKENHEATH: REPLACE SUPPLY MATERIAL CONTROL FACILITY ...... 11,300 11,300 ......................

DEFENSE-WIDE: RAF FELTWELL: CONSTRUCT NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL .............. 22,132 22,132 ......................

TOTAL, UNITED KINGDOM .................................................................... 55,832 55,832 ......................

WAKE ISLAND

AIR FORCE: WAKE ISLAND: REPAIR AIRFIELD PAVEMENT (PHASE I) ............... 25,000 ...................... ¥25,000

NATO

NATO SECURITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM ......................................................... 162,600 162,600 ......................

WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED

ARMY:

CLASSIFIED LOCATIONS:

CLASSIFIED PROJECT ...................................................................... 4,000 4,000 ......................

RESCISSION CLASSIFIED PROJECT ................................................. ...................... ¥26,400 ¥26,400

AIR FORCE: CLASSIFIED LOCATION: TACTICAL UNIT DETACHMENT FACILITY .. 4,458 4,458 ......................
53

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

DEFENSE-WIDE: CLASSIFIED LOCATION: AVIATION AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY ................................................................................................................ 2,400 2,400 ......................

TOTAL, WORLDWIDE CLASSIFIED ......................................................... 10,858 ¥15,542 ¥26,400

WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED

ARMY:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

HOST NATION SUPPORT .................................................................. 23,100 23,100 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 134,098 153,084 ∂18,986

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 18,000 21,130 ∂3,130

NAVY:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 29,932 37,332 ∂7,400

UPSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 10,546 13,321 ∂2,775

RESCISSION .................................................................................... ...................... ¥19,588 ¥19,588

AIR FORCE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 79,130 83,420 ∂4,290

UPSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 11,250 12,250 ∂1,000

RESCISSION .................................................................................... ...................... ¥4,000 ¥4,000

DEFENSE-WIDE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

ENERGY CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ....................... 35,600 35,600 ......................

CONTINGENCY CONSTRUCTION ...................................................... 10,000 10,000 ......................

RESCISSION .................................................................................... ...................... ¥65,280 ¥65,280

RESCISSION .................................................................................... ...................... ¥4,000 ¥4,000

PLANNING AND DESIGN;

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY .......................................... 26,300 30,300 ∂4,000

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................................... 6,861 6,861 ......................

CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEFENSE PROGRAM ................ 700 700 ......................

DEFENSE THREAT REDUCTION AGENCY ................................ 2,400 2,400 ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION ............ 1,929 1,929 ......................

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ........................ 6,290 6,290 ......................

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY .......................................... 6,516 16,516 ∂10,000

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ................................................ 3,500 3,500 ......................

UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................... 20,000 20,000 ......................

SUBTOTAL, PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................. 74,496 88,496 ∂14,000

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION:

TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY .......................................... 5,526 5,526 ......................

SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND .......................................... 1,903 1,903 ......................

DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE .................... 1,500 1,500 ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DEPENDENT EDUCATION ............ 4,249 4,249 ......................

BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ........................ 2,009 2,009 ......................

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF ........................................................ 6,305 6,305 ......................

UNDISTRIBUTED ..................................................................... 3,000 3,000 ......................

SUBTOTAL, UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............ 24,492 24,492 ......................

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 25,794 34,378 ∂8,584

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 4,671 22,381 ∂17,710

AIR NATIONAL GUARD:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 3,972 7,342 ∂3,370

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 5,000 8,425 ∂3,425

ARMY RESERVE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 8,024 8,024 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 2,375 2,375 ......................
54

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

NAVY RESERVE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 1,176 1,176 ......................

RESCISSION .................................................................................... ...................... ¥925 ¥925

AIR FORCE RESERVE:

UNSPECIFIED WORLDWIDE LOCATIONS:

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................. 4,336 4,336 ......................

UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION ............................................ 4,996 4,996 ......................

TOTAL, WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED ............................................. 510,988 501,865 ¥9,123

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY

ALASKA: FORT WAINWRIGHT (32 UNITS) .......................................................... 12,000 12,000 ......................

ARIZONA: FORT HUACHUCA (72 UNITS) ........................................................... 10,800 10,800 ......................

KANSAS: FORT LEAVENWORTH (80 UNITS) ....................................................... 10,000 20,000 ∂10,000

TEXAS:

FORT BLISS (76 UNITS) ........................................................................... 13,600 13,600 ......................

FORT SAM HOUSTON (80) ....................................................................... ...................... 11,200 ∂11,200

KOREA: CAMP HUMPHREYS (54 UNITS) ........................................................... 12,800 12,800 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 220,750 220,750 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 11,592 11,592 ......................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 291,542 312,742 ∂21,200

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

FURNISHING ACCOUNT ............................................................................ 45,546 45,546 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 82,177 82,177 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 1,277 1,277 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 49,520 49,520 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 258,790 258,790 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 196,956 196,956 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY ........................................................ 446,806 446,806 ......................

INTEREST PAYMENT ................................................................................. 1 1 ......................

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COST ............................................... 27,918 27,918 ......................

FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION ADJUSTMENT ................................... ...................... ...................... ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 1,108,991 1,108,991 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY ......................................................... 1,400,533 1,421,733 ∂21,200

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS

ARIZONA: YUMA (51 UNITS) ............................................................................. 9,017 9,017 ......................

CALIFORNIA: TWENTYNINE PALMS (74 UNITS) ................................................. 16,250 16,250 ......................

HAWAII:

KANEOHE BAY (212 UNITS) ..................................................................... 46,996 55,196 ∂8,200

PEARL HARBOR (70 UNITS) .................................................................... 16,827 16,827 ......................

MISSISSIPPI: PASCAGOULA (160 UNITS) .......................................................... 23,354 23,354 ......................

ITALY: SIGONELLA (10 UNITS) .......................................................................... 2,403 2,403 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 183,054 183,054 ......................

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 6,499 6,499 ......................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 304,400 312,600 ∂8,200

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 32,701 32,701 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 85,535 85,535 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT ..................................................................... 1,200 1,200 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 65,787 65,787 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 195,172 195,172 ......................

LEASING ACCOUNT .................................................................................. 123,965 123,965 ......................

MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 409,567 409,567 ......................

SVCM’S MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUM ACCOUNT ............................ 68 ......................

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COST ............................................... 4,100 4,100 ......................
55

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION ADJUSTMENT ................................... ...................... ...................... ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 918,095 918,095 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ........................ 1,222,495 1,230,695 ∂8,200

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE

ARIZONA: LUKE AFB (120 UNITS) .................................................................... 15,712 15,712 ......................

CALIFORNIA: TRAVIS AFB (118 UNITS) ............................................................. 18,150 18,150 ......................

COLORADO: BUCKLEY AFB (55 UNITS) ............................................................ 11,400 11,400 ......................

DELAWARE: DOVER AFB (120 UNITS) .............................................................. 18,145 18,145 ......................

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: BOLLING AFB (136 UNITS) ....................................... 16,926 16,926 ......................

HAWAII: HICKAM AFB (102 UNITS) ................................................................... 25,037 25,037 ......................

IDAHO: MOUNTAIN HOME AFB (56 UNITS) ....................................................... ...................... 10,000 ∂10,000

LOUISIANA: BARKSDALE AFB (56 UNITS) ......................................................... 7,300 7,300 ......................

SOUTH DAKOTA: ELLSWORTH AFB (78 UNITS) ................................................. 13,700 13,700 ......................

VIRGINIA: LANGLEY AFB (4 UNITS) .................................................................. 1,200 1,200 ......................

PORTUGAL: LAJES FIELD (64 UNITS) ................................................................ 13,230 13,230 ......................

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 352,879 375,345 ∂22,466

PLANNING AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 24,558 24,558 ......................

SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION ................................................................ 518,237 550,703 ∂32,466

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT .......................................................................... 36,619 36,619 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT ......................................................................... 58,224 58,224 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT ................................................................................ 28,356 28,356 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT ................................................................................. 168,652 168,652 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ...................................................................................... 2,384 2,384 ......................

LEASING ................................................................................................... 102,919 102,919 ......................

MAINTENANCE ......................................................................................... 436,526 436,526 ......................

MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS ........................................................ 35 35 ......................

HOUSING PRIVATIZATION SUPPORT COST ........................................................ 35,406 35,406 ......................

FOREIGN CURRENCY FLUCTUATION ADJUSTMENT ................................... ...................... ...................... ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 869,121 869,121 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE ................................................. 1,387,358 1,419,824 ∂32,466

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE

CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ...................................................................... 250 250 ......................

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE:

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (NSA) ................................................................ 129 129 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DIA) ................................................................. 3,630 3,630 ......................

FURNISHINGS ACCOUNT (DLA) ................................................................ 30 30 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (NSA) ............................................................... 15 15 ......................

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT (DLA) ............................................................... 292 292 ......................

MISCELLANEOUS ACCOUNT (NSA) ........................................................... 57 57 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT (NSA) ...................................................................... 374 374 ......................

SERVICES ACCOUNT (DLA) ...................................................................... 78 78 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT (NSA) ....................................................................... 414 414 ......................

UTILITIES ACCOUNT (DLA) ....................................................................... 428 428 ......................

LEASING (NSA) ........................................................................................ 11,698 11,698 ......................

LEASING (DLA) ......................................................................................... 25,600 25,600 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (NSA) .............................................. 658 658 ......................

MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY (DLA) .............................................. 359 359 ......................

SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ....................................... 43,762 43,762 ......................

TOTAL, FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE-WIDE .......................................... 44,012 44,012 ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ................ 2,000 2,000 ......................
56

MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT LISTING BY LOCATION—Continued

[In thousands of dollars]

Installation and project Budget

request

Committee

recommendation

Change from

budget

estimate

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND, DEFENSE

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND, DEFENSE ................................................... 10,119 10,119 ......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT, PART IV ................................. 532,200 682,200 ∂150,000

GRAND TOTAL ..................................................................................... 9,971,312 10,500,000 ∂528,688

RECAPITULATION

ARMY ................................................................................................................ 1,760,541 1,668,957 ¥91,584

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥26,400 ¥26,400

NAVY ................................................................................................................. 1,071,408 1,148,633 ∂77,225

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥19,588 ¥19,588

AIR FORCE ........................................................................................................ 1,068,250 1,148,269 ∂80,019

RESCISSION (GENERAL PROVISION 126) ................................................ ...................... ¥4,000 ¥4,000

DEFENSE AGENCIES ......................................................................................... 694,558 881,058 ∂186,500

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥65,280 ¥65,280

RESCISSION (GENERAL PROVISION 126) ................................................ ...................... ¥4,000 ¥4,000

ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ................................................................................... 267,389 378,549 ∂111,160

AIR NATIONAL GUARD ...................................................................................... 149,072 222,767 ∂73,695

ARMY RESERVE ................................................................................................ 111,404 111,404 ......................

NAVAL RESERVE ............................................................................................... 33,641 33,641 ......................

RESCISSION ............................................................................................. ...................... ¥925 ¥925

AIR FORCE RESERVE ........................................................................................ 53,732 53,732 ......................

TOTAL MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ........................................................ 5,209,995 5,526,817 ∂316,822

NATO INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................... 162,600 162,600 ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, ARMY .................................................................................. 1,400,533 1,421,733 ∂21,200

(NEW CONSTRUCTION) ............................................................................ (59,200) (80,400) (∂21,200)

(CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS) .......................................................... (220,750) (220,750) ......................

(PLANNING AND DESIGN) ........................................................................ (11,592) (11,592) ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (1,108,991) (1,108,991) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ................................................. 1,222,495 1,230,695 ∂8,200

(NEW CONSTRUCTION) ............................................................................ (114,847) (123,047) (∂8,200)

(CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS) .......................................................... (183,054) (183,054) ......................

(PLANNING AND DESIGN) ........................................................................ (6,499) (6,499) ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (918,095) (918,095) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, AIR FORCE .......................................................................... 1,387,358 1,419,824 ∂32,466

(NEW CONSTRUCTION) ............................................................................ (140,800) (150,800) (∂10,000)

(CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS) .......................................................... (352,879) (375,345) (∂22,466)

(PLANNING AND DESIGN) ........................................................................ (24,558) (24,558) ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (869,121) (869,121) ......................

FAMILY HOUSING, DEFENSE AGENCIES ............................................................ 44,012 44,012 ......................

(CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS) .......................................................... (250) (250) ......................

(OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE) ............................................................ (43,762) (43,762) ......................

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FAMILY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FUND ................ 2,000 2,000 ......................

HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE FUND ................................................................... 10,119 10,119 ......................

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE ACCOUNT ................................................ 532,200 682,200 ∂150,000

GRAND TOTAL ..................................................................................... 9,971,312 10,500,000 ∂528,688

Æ