alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §883j. Ocean satellite data

The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (hereinafter referred to in this subtitle 1 as the "Administration") shall take such actions, including the sponsorship of applied research, as may be necessary to assure the future availability and usefulness of ocean satellite data to the maritime community.

(Pub. L. 99–272, title VI, §6082, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 135.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle H (§§6081–6085) of title VI of Pub. L. 99–272, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 135, which enacted this section and section 1530 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, amended section 883e of this title and sections 330e, 2903 and 2904 of Title 15, and repealed section 2905 of Title 15. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary and other officers of Department of Commerce under this section that relate to the Office of Aeronautical Charting and Cartography to provide aeronautical charts, products, and services for safe and efficient navigation of air commerce transferred to Administrator of Federal Aviation Administration effective Oct. 1, 2000, see section 44721(c)(2) of Title 49, Transportation.

#### Report on Satellite Oceanography

Pub. L. 102–567, title I, §116, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4279, directed the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology through the Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences, in consultation with Federal, academic, and commercial users of remotely sensed data, to consider and develop findings and recommendations regarding the most urgent current needs of oceanographic researchers for remote sensing capabilities and remotely sensed data and the major goals of satellite oceanography for the next 10 years, and, not later than one year after Oct. 29, 1992, to submit to Congress a report which described the findings and recommendations of the Committee.

1 See References in Text note below.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-31183

Conference Calendar

 

GHULAM MOHAMMED NASIM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES A. FUSELIER, Individually and in his official capacity;

TODD LOUVIERE, Warden, Individually and in his official capacity;

MAJORIE ALLEMOND, Individually and in her official capacity;

SAMONE ALEX, Individually and in her official capacity; KEW

LEDET, Individually and in his official capacity; R. JENKINS,

Individually and in his official capacity; DONNA BROUSSARD,

Individually and in her official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-579

--------------------

June 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) detainee Ghulam

Mohammed Nasim (# 57187) moves this court for appointment of

appellate counsel. The motion is DENIED. Nasim appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as timebarred, but he implicitly concedes that his complaint was not

filed within the applicable one-year limitation period. See
No. 99-31183

-2-

Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 243-48 (1989); Elzy v. Roberson,

868 F.2d 793, 794-95 (5th Cir. 1989); LA. CIV. CODE ANN. art. 3492

(West 2000). We find no merit to Nasim’s argument that his

claims should be deemed to relate back to a prior lawsuit. 

Accordingly, the dismissal of the complaint is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR COUNSEL DENIED. MOTION TO STAY FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT IS MOOT IN LIGHT OF THE OPINION.
§ 630.1604 OPM and agency responsibilities. ( a ) OPM is responsible for prescribing regulations and guidance related to the appropriate use of leave under this subpart and the proper recording of such leave, including OPM guidance on Governmentwide dismissal and closure policies and procedures that provides for use of consistent terminology in describing various operating status scenarios. In issuing any operating status announcements for the Washington, DC, area, OPM must make the specific policies and procedures related to those announcements consistent with the regulations in this subpart and with OPM's Governmentwide guidance.
( b ) Employing agencies are responsible for— ( 1 ) Establishing and applying policies and procedures related to use of leave under this subpart that are consistent with OPM regulations and guidance described in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Using terminology required by OPM-issued Governmentwide guidance in any agency-specific operating status announcements they issue (for a specific geographic location or area).
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **
| In    connection with the Quarterly Report of Median Group Inc a Texas corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the    six months period ending June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),    Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (1) | The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations    of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| A signed    original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Median Group Inc., and will be retained by    Median Group Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| /s/    *Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali*                           |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| --------------------------                                 |
| Mohd Suhaimi bin    Rozali                                 |
| Chief Financial    Officer                                 |
|  

August                                    17, 2017 |
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

| **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
    In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Media Group Corporation a Texas    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months period ending June    30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Cheng Pheng LOI, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to    the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Media Group Corporation, and will be retained by China Media Group Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
    /s/ Cheng Pheng LOI
--------------------------
Cheng    Pheng LOI
Chief    Executive Officer
August    17, 2010 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §868a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Jan. 19, 1942, ch. 6, §10, 56 Stat. 8; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318; Oct. 14, 1966, Pub. L. 89–657, §2, 80 Stat. 907; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, related to the purchase of commissary and quartermaster supplies by personnel from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and has been superseded by former section 857–4 of this title and section 3074 of this title.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-2 (No. 333-76642), Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87555, 333-81698,
333-85036, 333-91480, 333-101547 and 333-99005) and Form S-8 (No. 333-96563) of
Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation of our report dated January 18, 2003,
relating to the financial statements, which is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 25, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (no.
333-52005) on Form S-1 of U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC of our report
dated April 11, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of U.S.
Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC and subsidiary and our report dated April 11,
2003 relating to the financial statements of US Timberlands Yakima, LLC which
are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                       Eisner LLP (Formerly Richard A. Eisner &
                                                   Company, LLP)



New York, New York
April 14, 2003
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Sohini Chatterjee, New York City, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating her to the practice of law following her suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1715 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to November 11, 2019, the December 23, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department and respondent's supplemental affidavit sworn to January 9, 2020, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan], 173 AD3d 1602, 1603 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1051 [2018]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Devine, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 161 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 161

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Nathaniel R. 
         Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Portman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
 at 10 East Commerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, as the ``Nathaniel R. 
         Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATHANIEL R. JONES FEDERAL BUILDING AND 
              UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

     The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 10 
East Commerce Street in Youngstown, Ohio, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

     Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Nathaniel R. Jones Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
AFS-14-212-E

July 22, 2014

Mr. Alex C. Anderegg

2261 N. Hilltop Dr.

Muskegon, MI 49441

Dear Mr. Anderegg:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption, and 

explains why we cannot process your request for exemption, from §§ 61.160(b)(3)(i) and 

(b)(3)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

You entered a petition for exemption on March 24, 2014, into the public docket (No. FAA2014-0201), but we are unable to process your request any further. The relief that you are 

seeking is for an eligibility requirement for the restricted privileges airline transport pilot (RATP) certificate. If an individual were granted the relief you have requested, further relief 

from additional requirements listed in § 61.160(b) would be needed to exercise that relief. 

Specifically, § 61.160(b)(1) requires an applicant for an R-ATP certificate to hold a 

Bachelor’s degree with an aviation major from an institution of higher education that has been 

issued a letter of authorization (LOA) by the FAA under § 61.169(b). Under § 61.169(b), an 

institution of higher education must comply with the LOA and may not certify a graduate 

unless it determines that the graduate meets the requirements of § 61.160.

Additionally, under § 61.160(b)(4), an applicant for an R-ATP certificate with an airplane 

category multiengine class rating, or R-ATP certificate obtained concurrently with an airplane 

type rating “must present an official transcript and certifying document from an institution of 

higher education that holds a letter of authorization from the Administrator under § 61.169.” 

The relief that you have requested would not permit an institution of higher education to 

deviate from the requirements prescribed in § 61.169 or the conditions listed in the letter of 

authorization.

In summary the relief for which you are petitioning the FAA is insufficient for the outcome 

you are seeking and would not provide the appropriate relief for an individual to be eligible 

for an R-ATP in accordance with § 61.160(b). The FAA will only consider the relief that you 

have requested from an institution of higher education, as defined in § 61.1, which has the 
2

same meaning as defined by the Department of Education in 34 CFR 600.4. The authority to 

certify graduates for an ATP certificate under the academic and aeronautical experience 

requirements in § 61.160 may be satisfied only by the institution’s determination of eligibility.

In consideration of the forgoing the FAA will take no further action on your request for an 

exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.160(c)(2) and 61.160(c)(3).

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further If you have any questions, you may call Carl N. Johnson, Acting Deputy Division 

Manager (AFS-801) General Aviation and Commercial Division, Flight Standards Service at 

(202)-385-9600. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
NRC ORDERS ALASKA RADIOGRAPHY FIRM TO CEASE OPERATIONS 

BECAUSE OF REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has ordered Alaska Industrial X-Ray, Inc. (AIX), to 

cease licensed radiography operations immediately because the company repeatedly violated 

NRC requirements that two qualified individuals conduct industrial radiography at a temporary 

job site. 

 The suspension order, issued Oct. 19, is effective immediately and until the company 

implements measures that reassure the NRC its regulations will be met. 

 AIX, based in Anchorage, routinely performs radiography at a client’s industrial facility, 

using a makeshift “vault.” The company applied to the NRC to have the vault approved as a 

permanent radiography installation in 1999. The agency determined the vault did not meet safety 

standards, and the company was unwilling to make improvements. Since the vault is considered 

a temporary job site, the company is required to have two qualified individuals (either two 

radiographers or one radiographer and a radiography assistant) present when performing 

radiography operations to guard against inadvertent exposures to the radiographers or others. 

 An NRC inspection and investigation from June through October determined that AIX 

employees routinely violated the two-person requirement by having one radiographer present 

while the second went to a separate facility to develop film. This practice occurred regularly for 

up to three years, even though the company was cited by the NRC for similar violations in 2001 

and had pledged to follow the two-person requirement. 

 “The safety and health of the public and workers are at risk whenever industrial 

radiography is conducted and these safety requirements are not being followed,” said Cynthia 

Carpenter, NRC’s director of enforcement. 

 The NRC issues suspension orders to remove a threat to public health and safety. They 

can be effective immediately when necessary to protect public health and safety or in response to 

willful violations of NRC safety requirements. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-137 October 22, 2007
 Industrial radiography uses a radioactive source to perform non-invasive testing of 

materials. Improper handling of the radiography camera and the radiation source can result in 

harmful exposure to workers or members of the public. 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 630.1606 Administration of weather and safety leave. ( a ) An agency must use the same minimum charge increments for weather and safety leave as it does for annual and sick leave under § 630.206.
( b ) Employees may be granted weather and safety leave only for hours within the tour of duty established for purposes of charging annual and sick leave when absent. For full-time employees, that tour is the 40-hour basic workweek as defined in 5 CFR 610.102, the basic work requirement established for employees on a flexible or compressed work schedule as defined in 5 U.S.C. 6121(3), or an uncommon tour of duty under § 630.210.
( c ) Employees may not receive weather and safety leave for hours during which they are on other preapproved leave (paid or unpaid) or paid time off. Agencies should not provide weather and safety leave to an employee who, in the agency's judgment, is cancelling preapproved leave or paid time off, or changing a regular day off in a flexible or compressed work schedule, for the primary purpose of obtaining weather and safety leave.
# L_2014215EN.01000102.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 215/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the facilitation of the issuance of visas will enter into force on 1 September 2014 in accordance with Article 14(2) of the Agreement, as the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Azerbaijan on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation will enter into force on that date.

---