SERVED : AUGUS T 20 , 201 0

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTE RO F HARRISO N YACH T SALES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 6 (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-062 6

ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV E LA WJUDG E Thi s proceedin g arise s from acomplain t serve dJul y 20 , 2010 , allegin g violatio n o f th e Federal Aviatio n Act/Regulations , an dth e Respondent' s reques t for hearin g date dJun e 29 , 2010 . Th e undersigne dadministrativ e la w judg e was assigne dt o thi s proceedin g b y Notic e serve d Augus t 20,2010 . Th e Rule s o f

Practic e for

thi s proceedin g are se t

fort hi n Part 13 , Subpart

G , o f th e Feder

al Aviatio n Regulation s (1 4 C.F.R . § § 13.201-13.23 5 (2009)) . Thos e rule s provide , inte r alia , tha t th e Responden t

mus t file awritte n answe r

o r motio n withi n 3 0 day s afte r servic e o f

th e complain t ( § 13.209(a)) ; tha t

agenera l denia l i s deeme dafailur e t o file an answe r ( § 13.209(e)) ; that failure t o file an answe r

withou t goo dcaus e i s deeme dan admissio n o f eac hallegatio n i n th e complain t ( § 13.209(f)) , an dtha t

apart y seekin g a n extensio n o f tim e mus t

file awritte n motio n at leas t seve n day s befor e th e documen t i s due , absen t

agreemen t

o f th e partie s o r

goo dcaus e show n ( § 13.213(a ) an d(b)) ./

T o expedit e th e hearing i n thi s matter . Complainan t an dth e Respondent , o n o r before September

20 , 2010 , shal l file (1 ) an y amendmen t o f th e complain t

o r answer; ' (2 ) a

n agree do r separat e propose dprocedura l schedules , includin g propose ddates (/ . e. , specifi c dates , no t merel y number s o r

day s before th e hearing ) for (a ) filing stipulations , alis t o f witnesses , asummary o f thei r propose dtestimony , an dfo r (b ) exchangin g exhibit s an ddiscovery , i f any ; (3 ) astatemen t concernin g th e statu s o f

settlemen t

efforts ; an d(4 ) apropose dhearin g sit e and , absen t agreemen t o f th e parties , ajustificatio n o f th e propose dsite . Se e 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.217 . Unde r FA A Orde r

2150.3 B (Oct . 1 , 2007 ) an dth e Rule s governin g thes e proceedings . Complainan t

an dth e Responden t

shoul dcontinu e t o conside r th e possibility o f

settlemen t

an d compromis e o f

thi s matter . I n connectio n withsuc hdiscussions , th e partie s shoul dnot e tha t FA A Order

2150.3B , whic hestablishe s standard s fo r th e Complainant' s conduc t an dsettlemen t o f thi s proceeding , i s availabl e o n th e Internet. ^ See , i n particular , chapte r 6 (Legal Enforcemen t Action s an dLegal Counse l Responsibilities) ; an deithe r (a ) Appendi x B (Tabl e o f Sanctions) , page s B-1—B 8 (Part

On e - Abbreviation s an dDefinitions ) an dthos e portion s o f Part Tw o - Sanctio n Guidanc e Tables , whic happl y t o particular allegation s not

involvin g hazardou s mate rials , o r (b ) Appendi x C , whic hpertain s t o hazardou s material s cases . Upo n reques t o f Respon

-

' Further amendment s are no t

anticipate dabsent

goo dcaus e shown . Thoug h 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.214(b)(1 ) permit s amendment s a

t any tim e more tha

n 1 5 day s befor

e ahearing , utili2atio n o f

that provisio n woul dpreven t

orderl y prepara tio n fo r ahearin g andcoul dprevent any hearin g a

t all , becaus e notic e o f

ahearin g mus t

b e give n 6 0 day s in advance . § 13.221(a) . A

n amendmen t

that migh t b e filed1 5 day s prio r

t o th e hearin g woul dentitl e th e other part y u p t o 2 0 day s i n whicht o reply ( § 13.214(c)) , an dcoul dgenerate ane w roun do f schedule s ( § 13.217) , motion s ( § 13.218) , an ddiscover y ( § 13.220) , necessitatin g apos^onemen t o f th e hearing , anew 60-da

y notice , e t

ceter aa dinfinitum . ^ Se e Lind aJoyc e Goodman , FA A Docke t No . CP89WP0061 , DM S No . FAA-2004-18292 , at 1 1 (Ma y 30 , 1989) , availabl e a t

www.regulations.go v (concludin g that "th e prosecutin g agenc y attorne y mus t conside r settle

men t an dtha t th e Rule s d o no t

permi t th e Chie f Counse l t o exercis e polic y contro l o r decisionmakin g i n thi s cas e o r i n civi l penalty case s generall y s o a s t o den y prosecutoria l discretio n with respec t t o settlemen t

an dcompromis e t o th e agenc y attorne y a s define di n th e rules") . Se e als o Exec . Orde r No . 12,988,6 1 Fed . Reg . 472 9 (Feb . 5,1996) , whic hrefer s t o facilitatin g th e jus t an defficien t

resolutio n o f

civi l claim s involvin g th e Unite dState s Governmen t an dwhic hdirect s Federal agencie s an dthei r litigatio n counse l to , "a s soo n a s practicabl e after ascertainin g th e na tur e o f adisput e i n litigation , an dthroughou t th e litigation,.. . evaluat e settlemen t possibilitie s an dmak e reasonabl e effort s t o settl e th e litigation. " Se e als o FA A Orde r 2150.3 B a

t paragrap h 6-2 . ^ Accesse dat

http://rgl.faa.go v by selectin g "Orders/Notices, " the n "Curren t Orders ; B y Number, " the n "2150.3 3 10/01/200 7 FAA Complianc e an dEnforcemen t Program(Chang e 1 included). "dent , Complainan t shal l provid e Responden t acop y o f

th e applicabl e reference dprovisions . Submission s sen t

t o th e stree t

addres s o f

th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportation , Offic e o f Hearings , b y regular

mai l ma y b e delaye du p t o four week s du e t o posta l screenin g an dmay b e

• V "irradiated, " whic hma y resul t i n page s bein g fuse dtogether . Accordingly , partie s wh o serv e submission s o n th e Judg e b y regular mai l shoul dals o fax , expres s carrier , o r personall y delive r thos e submissions . Th e certificat e o f servic e shoul dreflec t

th e manne r

o f service . Compromis e ma y b e effecte dwit ho r withou t afinding o f

violatio n ( § 13.16(n)) . Eac h party' s filing shal l includ e atelephon e numbe r wher e th e part y ca n b e reache db y th e Judg e for prehearin g telephon e conferences . S O ORDERED .

A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w J

# U- Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

-3 -"1 1

FA A Docke t

No . CP10EA000 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Davi dHarrison , Presiden t Harriso n Yach t

Sales , Inc. , Responden t 10 6 Well s Cov e Roa d P.O . Bo x 9 8 Grasonville,M D 2163 8 TEL : 401-827-780 0 FAX : 410-827-483 0 Mar y Madelin e McCarthy , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-326 7 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mEl2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

" Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e i n perso n o r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Fed

eral Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbur Wrigh t Building

- Suit e 2W1060 , Washing

ton , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .

- 4 -