Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices 35951 

natural gas (LNG) pathway and 

amendments to various associated 

registration, recordkeeping, and 

reporting provisions. The final 

regulation includes a lifecycle 

greenhouse gas emissions analysis for 

renewable electricity, renewable diesel 

and naphtha produced from landfill 

biogas. Adding these new pathways will 

enhance the ability of the biofuels 

industry to supply advanced biofuels, 

including cellulosic biofuels, which 

greatly reduce the greenhouse gas 

emissions (GHG) compared to the 

petroleum-based fuels they replace. It 

also addresses ‘‘nameplate capacity’’ 

issues for certain production facilities 

that do not claim exemption from the 20 

percent GHG reduction threshold. In the 

accompanying final rule for this ICR, 

EPA addressed issues related to crop 

residue and corn kernel fiber and 

finalized an approach to determining 

the volume of cellulosic Renewable 

Identification Numbers (RIN’s) 

produced from various cellulosic 

feedstocks. We also included a lifecycle 

analysis of advanced butanol and 

discussed the potential to allow for 

commingling of compliant products at 

the retail facility level as long as the 

environmental performance of the fuels 

would not be detrimental. Several other 

amendments to the RFS2 program were 

included. 

In the final rule, EPA also amended 

various changes to the E15 (gasoline 

containing up to 15 volume percent 

ethanol) mis-fueling mitigation 

regulations (MMR) at 40 CFR part 80, 

subpart N. Among the E15 changes 

finalized were technical corrections and 

amendments to sections dealing with 

labeling, E15 surveys, product transfer 

documents, and prohibited acts. 

Technical amendments and corrections 

for this regulations had no bearings on 

the industry estimates. 

Lastly, EPA finalized changes to the 

survey requirements associated with the 

ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) program. 

This change is not addressed here 

because there are fewer than nine 

respondents. 

Form Numbers: 2 

RFS1700–RFS2 Renewable Fuel 

Producers—Cellulosic Converted 

Fraction—5900–362 

RFS1300–RFS2 Renewable Fuel 

Producers Using Crop Residue as a 

Feedstock Report—5900–262 

Respondents/affected entities: 

Producers of renewable fuels, Producers 

of renewable electricity, Importers of 

renewable fuels, Feedstock producers 

from waste treatment plants, Feedstock 

producers from landfills, Parties who 

own RINS’s. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Mandatory. 

Estimated number of respondents: 60 

(total). 

Frequency of response: Quarterly, 

annually, on occasion. 

Total estimated burden: 8,889 hours 

(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.03(b). 

Total estimated cost: $1,081,415 (per 

year), includes $0 annualized capital or 

operation & maintenance costs. 

Changes in Estimates EPA estimates 

yearly 60 respondents and 8,889 burden 

hours which will cost industry 

$1,081,415. This is a new collection 

with no industry cost for comparison. 

Dated: June 15, 2015. 

Byron Bunker, 

Director, Compliance Division, Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air 

and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–15467 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9929–53–OGC] 

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air 

Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent 

decree; request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby 

given of a proposed consent decree to 

address a lawsuit filed by the 

Environmental Integrity Project: 

Environmental Integrity Project v. 

McCarthy, No. 1:14-cv-2106 (RC) (D. 

D.C.). On December 12, 2014, Plaintiff 

filed a complaint alleging that Gina 

McCarthy, in her official capacity as 

Administrator of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty to grant or deny 

within 60 days two petitions submitted 

by the Environmental Integrity Project 

on May 19, 2014, requesting that EPA 

object to two CAA Title V permits 

issued by the Texas Commission on 

Environmental Quality (‘‘TCEQ’’) to the 

Shell Chemical Company and the Shell 

Oil Company authorizing the operation 

of the Deer Park Chemical Plant and the 

Deer Park Refinery, respectively, located 

in Harris County, Texas. The proposed 

consent decree would establish a 

deadline of August 21, 2015, for EPA to 

take such action. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed consent decree must be 

received by July 23, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2015–0364, online at 

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method); by email to oei.docket@

epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; 

or by hand delivery or courier to EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 

4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. Comments on 

a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted 

in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use 

of special characters and any form of 

encryption, and may be mailed to the 

mailing address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard H. Vetter, Air and Radiation 

Law Office, Office of General Counsel, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

c/o US/EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/IO D205–01, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711; telephone: (919) 541–2127; fax 

number (919) 541–4991; email address: 

vetter.rick@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Consent Decree 

The proposed consent decree would 

resolve a lawsuit filed by the 

Environmental Integrity Project seeking 

to compel the Administrator to take 

actions under CAA section 505(b)(2). 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, EPA would agree to sign 

its response granting or denying the 

petitions filed by the Environmental 

Integrity Project regarding Shell 

Chemical Company’s Deer Park 

Chemical Plant and Shell Oil 

Company’s Deer Park Refinery, both 

located in Harris County, Texas, 

pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the 

CAA, on or before August 21, 2015. 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, EPA would 

expeditiously deliver notice of EPA’s 

response to the Office of the Federal 

Register for review and publication 

following signature of such response. In 

addition, the proposed consent decree 

outlines the procedure for the Plaintiffs 

to request costs of litigation, including 

attorney fees. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, EPA will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree from persons who are 

not named as parties or intervenors to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

35952 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 120 / Tuesday, June 23, 2015 / Notices 

the litigation in question. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. Unless 

EPA or the Department of Justice 

determines that consent to this consent 

decree should be withdrawn, the terms 

of the consent decree will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed Consent 

Decree 

A. How can I get a copy of the consent 

decree? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2015–0364) contains a 

copy of the proposed consent decree. 

The official public docket is available 

for public viewing at the Office of 

Environmental Information (OEI) Docket 

in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OEI 

Docket is (202) 566–1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through 

www.regulations.gov. You may use 

www.regulations.gov to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and to access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search.’’ 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at www.regulations.gov 

without change, unless the comment 

contains copyrighted material, CBI, or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the www.regulations.gov Web 

site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address is automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the official public 

docket, and made available in EPA’s 

electronic public docket. 

Dated: June 15, 2015. 

Lorie J. Schmidt, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2015–15460 Filed 6–22–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Public Safety and Homeland Security 

Bureau; Federal Advisory Committee 

Act; Task Force on Optimal Public 

Safety Answering Point Architecture 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA), this notice advises interested 

persons that the Federal 

Communications Commission’s (FCC) 

Task Force on Optimal Public Safety 

Answering Point (PSAP) Architecture 

(Task Force) will hold its third meeting. 

DATES: July 27, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, Room TW–C305 

(Commission Meeting Room), 445 12th 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Timothy May, Federal Communications 

Commission, Public Safety and 

Homeland Security Bureau, 202–418– 

1463, email: timothy.may@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting will be held on July 27, 2015, 

from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the 

Commission Meeting Room of the FCC, 

Room TW–305, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. The Task Force 

is a Federal Advisory Committee that 

studies and will report findings and 

recommendations on PSAP structure 

and architecture to determine whether 

additional consolidation of PSAP 

infrastructure and architecture 

improvements would promote greater 

efficiency of operations, safety of life, 

and cost containment, while retaining 

needed integration with local first 

responder dispatch and support. On 

December 2, 2014, pursuant to the 

FACA, the Commission established the 

Task Force charter for a period of two 

years, through December 2, 2016. At this 

meeting, the Task Force will vote on the 

recommendations and report of Working 

Group 3, ‘‘Optimal Approach to NextGeneration 911 Resource Allocation for 

PSAPs.’’ 

Members of the general public may 

attend the meeting. The FCC will 

attempt to accommodate as many 

attendees as possible; however, 

admittance will be limited to seating 

availability. The Commission will 

provide audio and/or video coverage of 

the meeting over the Internet from the 

FCC’s Web page at http://www.fcc.gov/ 

live. 

Open captioning will be provided for 

this event. Other reasonable 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES