alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-117 September 15, 2003

REVISED DATE

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET SEPTEMBER 16-18 SEPTEMBER 23-24 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will

hold a meeting from September 23-24 in Rockville, Md. The agenda includes discussion of the topics

the Committee intends to examine over the next 12 to 18 months.

The meeting is open to the public, and will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White

Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. The meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. on Sept. 23, and

at 8:30 a.m. on Sept. 24.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2003/ . For additional information or

schedule changes, please contact Howard Larson at 301/415-6805.

###
Hillsborough*,*

Dec., 1896.

#### Schmidt *& a., Ap’ts, v.*Ellis *& a.*

The probate court has jurisdiction of an assignment in insolvency by a partnership owning property and doing business in this state, although one of the partners is a non-resident.

Appeal, from the decree of the judge of prohate, adjudging the defendants insolvent. Facts agreed. In 1892, the defendants, Ellis of Manchester and Tirrell of Boston, Massachusetts, bégan business in Manchester as copartners under the name of Ellis & Co. All the business of the firm has been done in Manchester, and they have had elsewhere no partnership property. In August, 1895, their property was attached by the plaintiffs, and in September following, upon their own petition, the firm was decreed insolvent. The plaintiffs assign as the reason for their appeal that the decree is invalid because one of the defendants is not a resident of the state.

*Burnham, Brown Warren*and *Drury ‡ Peaslee,*for the plaintiffs.

*David A. laggart,*for the defendants.

Carpenter, C. J.

The statute providing that “ the insolvency of a partnership shall render each partner insolvent within the meaning of this chapter, and his property . . . shall pass to the messenger and assignee appointed in the partnership proceedings” (P. S., c. 201, *s.*46) is applicable to such partners only as reside in the state. The insolvency court has no jurisdiction of non-resident debtors. P. S., *c.*201, *ss.*6, 42; *Ayer*v. *Weeks,*65 N. H. 248; *Smith*v. *Stanley,*67 N. H. 328; *Smith*v. *Hammond,*68 N. H. 363. Tirrell individually and his private property are not affected by the decree. But his exemption from the operation of the law does not deprive the court of its jurisdiction over Ellis, his individual property, and the partnership property in his possession. No more does the circumstance that Tirrell’s separate property cannot be here administered and distributed among his creditors afford any reason why the property of Ellis and of the firm should be “screened from the operation of the insolvent.law.” *McDaniel*v. *King,*5 Cush. 469, 476.

*Appeal dismissed.*

All concurred.
#### § 359.804 Length of furlough.

A furlough may not extend more than one year. It may be made only when the agency intends to recall the appointee within one year.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-11178

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEMETRIUS KENYON HALL, also known as

Jack Frost,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CR-121-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

October 10, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Demetrius Kenyon Hall has filed

a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. Hall’s

request for a copy of the record and an extension of time in

which to identify nonfrivolous issues for appeal is DENIED.
§ 2635.705 Use of official time. ( a ) *Use of an employee's own time.* Unless authorized in accordance with law or regulations to use such time for other purposes, employees must use official time in an honest effort to perform official duties. Employees not under a leave system, including Presidential appointees exempted under 5 U.S.C. 6301(2), have an obligation to expend an honest effort and a reasonable proportion of their time in the performance of official duties. *Example 1 to paragraph (a):* A disability claims examiner of the Social Security Administration may use official time to engage in certain representational activities on behalf of the employee union of which they are a member. Under 5 U.S.C. 7131, this is a proper use of official time even though it does not involve performance of assigned duties as a disability claims examiner.
*Example 2 to paragraph (a):* A pharmacist employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs has been granted an excused absence to participate as a speaker in a conference on drug abuse sponsored by the professional association to which they belong. Even if an excused absence granted by an agency in accordance with Governmentwide personnel guidance would allow employees to be absent from their official duties without charge to their annual leave accounts, such absence would not be on official time.
( b ) *Use of a subordinate's time.* Employees may not encourage, direct, coerce, or request a subordinate to use official time to perform activities other than those required in the performance of official duties or authorized in accordance with law or regulation. *Example 1 to paragraph (b):* A supervisory employee of the Department of Housing and Urban Development may not ask an assistant to run personal errands for the employee during duty hours. Further, directing or coercing a subordinate to perform such activities during nonduty hours constitutes an improper use of public office for private gain in violation of § 2635.702(a). However, when an arrangement is entirely voluntary and appropriate compensation is paid, a subordinate may provide services to the superior during nonduty hours. For example, a subordinate who enjoys calligraphy may prepare invitations for an upcoming party that the superior is organizing with friends and family at home on personal time for appropriate compensation. When the compensation is not adequate, however, the arrangement would involve a gift to the superior in violation of the standards in subpart C of this part.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-162 December 2, 2005

NRC ACCEPTS GENERAL ELECTRIC’S APPLICATION FOR

ESBWR ADVANCED REACTOR DESIGN CERTIFICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has accepted an application from the General

Electric Company to certify the Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR) advanced

nuclear power plant design, after determining the application has sufficient information to be formally

“docketed” and reviewed.

The ESBWR is a nuclear power plant capable of producing approximately 1,550 megawatts of

electricity. The plant features enhanced safety systems that rely on gravity and natural processes to

safely shut down the reactor or mitigate the effects of an accident. It is designed for a 60-year operating

life.

“Our staff has enough information to start an evaluation of the entire design,” said David

Matthews, Director of the New Reactor Licensing Division in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation. “We’ll ask GE for more details on the ESBWR, as needed, while the review goes

forward.”

If certification is granted, a company that wishes to build and operate a new nuclear power plant

could choose to use the design and reference it in a license application. Safety issues resolved within

the scope of the design certification are not subject to litigation with respect to an individual license

application. Site-specific design information and environmental impacts associated with building and

operating the plant at a particular location could be litigated. The NRC has certified three other

standard reactor designs and is considering certification of a fourth later this year.

General Electric submitted its application Aug. 25 and provided supplemental information

several times in September and October. The application (docket number 52-010) is available both in a

Federal Register notice to be published shortly and on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/design-cert/esbwr.html . 

During the staff’s review of the ESBWR, they will continue to request additional information,

if necessary, to properly analyze the design, and then issue an initial Safety Evaluation Report, which

would identify remaining technical and safety questions to be resolved. A supplemental Safety
Evaluation Report will be issued when all technical and safety issues with the design have been

resolved.

Once the design has passed staff review it can then be certified through NRC's rulemaking

process, which is open to public participation. The certification process is described in Title 10 of the

Code of Federal Regulations, Part 52, Subpart B. The design certification process normally lasts

between 42 and 60 months.

###
#### Edward J. Danziger, Respondent, v. Hearst Corporation et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Glennon and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny plaintiff’s motion. [See *post,*p. 644.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ASECO
CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          14,245
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                       410
<INVENTORY>                                      8,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,267
<PP&E>                                           4,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,554
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,762
<SALES>                                          6,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,722
<CGS>                                            3,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (1)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    292
<INCOME-TAX>                                        58
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
§ 630.1110 Limitation on the amount of annual leave donated by an emergency leave donor. ( a ) An emergency leave donor may not contribute less than 1 hour or more than 104 hours of annual leave in a leave year to an emergency leave transfer program. Each agency may establish written criteria for waiving the 104-hour limitation on donating annual leave in a leave year.
( b ) Annual leave donated to an emergency leave transfer program may not be applied against the limitations on the donation of annual leave under the voluntary leave transfer or leave bank programs established under 5 U.S.C. 6332 and 6362, respectively.
#### § 550.1636 Exemption from Fair Labor Standards Act.

The minimum wage and the hours of work and overtime pay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act do not apply to Border Patrol agents. (See also 5 CFR 551.217.)
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katherine A. Anderson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      10, 2010
            By: /s/ Katherine A.
    AndersonKatherine
      A. AndersonChief
      Accounting OfficerRepros
      Therapeutics Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Repros and will be retained by Repros and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 203/Minimum Performance 
Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 203, Minimum Performance 
Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 203, Minimum Performance Standards 
for Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Unmanned Aircraft.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 30-December 2, 2004 starting 
at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 
805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 803, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 135 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> November 30-December 2:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome and Introductory Remarks, 
Review/Approval of Meeting Agenda)
    <bullet> Federal Committee Advisory Act (FACA)/RTCA Procedures
    <bullet> Review of Committee Terms of Reference
    <bullet> Key Note Commentary
    <bullet> Special Committee Structure, Organization and Work Plan
    <bullet> Presentations--Unmanned Aircraft Systems
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (New/Unfinished Business, Date and 
Place of Next Meeting, Review Actions Items/Work Program)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2004.
Robert Zoldos,
FAA System Engineer, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 04-24849 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofMothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Edward M. Krell, Executive Vice President—Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL**                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward M. Krell                                     |
| *Executive Vice President-Chief Financial  Officer* |
| August 9, 2005                                 |

 

----
### §40503. Use of funds

An applicant receiving a grant award under this chapter may use such funds to—

(1) pay for the costs incurred during or after fiscal year 2017 for the transportation, processing, identification, and reporting of missing persons and unidentified remains, including migrants;

(2) establish and expand programs developed to improve the reporting of unidentified persons in accordance with the assurances provided in the application submitted pursuant to section 40502(b) of this title;

(3) hire and maintain additional DNA case analysts and technicians, fingerprint examiners, forensic odontologists, and forensic anthropologists, needed to support such identification programs; and

(4) procure and maintain state of the art multi-modal, multi-purpose forensic and DNA-typing and analytical equipment.

(Pub. L. 106–177, title II, §205, as added Pub. L. 116–277, §2(a)(3), Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3369.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 40503, Pub. L. 106–177, title II, §204, Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 36, related to uses of funds that a State received to establish or expand programs developed to improve the reporting of unidentified persons, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–277, §2(a)(3), Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3369. Such section was formerly classified to section 14663 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as section 40503.
MEMORANDUM

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0451 

 Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0215 

From: Hillary Ward, U.S. EPA, OAQPS, Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Subject: Stakeholder Meeting 2014 

Hillary Ward of EPA/SPPD met with the following people from the Environmental 

Defense Fund (EDF) to discuss their public comments on the rulemakings for Municipal 

Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills Emission Guidelines and New Source Performance

Standards (NSPS). 

Date: September 24, 2014 

Location: U.S. EPA, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Room E145, Research Triangle Park, NC

Attendees: 

Hillary Ward, EPA/SPPD

David Cozzie, EPA/SPPD

Peter Zalzal (EDF)

Tomas Carbonell (EDF)

Topics: This organization’s public comments on the proposed New Source Performance 

Standards and the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the MSW Emission 

Guidelines. 

 1
§ 1210.2 Definitions. ( a ) The term *employee covered by this part* means an individual career appointee as that term is defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(4) or an individual who occupies an administrative or executive position and is appointed under 38 U.S.C. 7306(a) or 7401(1). (38 U.S.C. 713(a) and (g)).
( b ) The term *administrative judge* means a person experienced in hearing appeals and assigned by the Board to hold a hearing and decide an appeal arising under this part. (38 U.S.C. 713(e)(1)).
( c ) The term *response file* means all documents and evidence the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, or designee, used in making the decision to remove or transfer an employee covered by this part. It also may include any additional documents or evidence that the agency would present in support of the Secretary's determination in the event that an appeal is filed.
( d ) The term *misconduct* includes neglect of duty, malfeasance, or failure to accept a directed reassignment or to accompany a position in a transfer of function. (38 U.S.C. 713(g)(2)).
( e ) The term *transfer* means the transfer of an employee covered by this part to a General Schedule position. (38 U.S.C. 713(a)(1)(B)).
[79 FR 48943, Aug. 19, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 49423, Aug. 21, 2014]