alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HARRIS APPLICATION FOR NEW REACTORS 

AVAILABLE ON NRC WEBSITE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today made available the public version of a 

combined license (COL) application for two new reactors at the Harris site near Apex, N.C. 

The applicant, Progress Energy, submitted the application and associated information 

Feb. 19. The application, minus proprietary or security-related details, is available on the NRC 

Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/col.html . 

The Progress COL application seeks approval to build and operate two AP1000 reactors 

at the site, approximately 20 miles southwest of Raleigh. The AP1000 is a Westinghousedesigned 1,100 MWe pressurized-water reactor the NRC certified in 2006. The NRC accepted 

Westinghouse’s application to amend the AP1000 design in January. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial check of the application to determine 

whether it contains sufficient information required for a formal review. If the application passes 

the initial check, the NRC will “docket,” or accept it for review; this decision is expected in 

April. If the application is accepted for formal review, the NRC will then notice an opportunity 

for the public to participate in an adjudicatory hearing on the application. 

The NRC is currently reviewing COL applications for the Lee site in South Carolina, the 

South Texas Project site in Texas, the Bellefonte site in Alabama, the North Anna site in 

Virginia, and a partial application for the Calvert Cliffs site in Maryland. The agency is also 

conducting an acceptance review on an application for the Grand Gulf site in Mississippi. The 

agency expects an additional 14 applications in 2008. Information about the new reactor 

licensing process is available on the NRC Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactorlicensing.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 08-049 March 10, 2008
|  |  | CNET tech sites:Price comparisons|Product reviews|Tech news|Downloads|Site map |  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
|  |  |
|  |  |  | TelevisionsMusicDigital CamerasCamcordersHandheldsDesktopsNotebooksComponentsPeripheralsMore »  CNET : **Shopper****** |  |
|--|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
### §679. Violation of permit to mine; penalty

An intentional violation on the part of a mine owner or owners, company, or corporation, or the agents or employees of either, of the conditions of the order granted pursuant to section 673 of this title, or such modifications thereof as may have been made by said commission, shall work a forfeiture of the privileges thereby conferred, and upon notice being served by the order of said commission upon such owner or owners, company, or corporation, or agent in charge, work shall immediately cease. Said commission shall take necessary steps to enforce its orders in case of the failure, neglect, or refusal of such owner or owners, company, or corporation, or agents thereof, to comply therewith, or in the event of any person or persons, company, or corporation working by said process in said territory contrary to law.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §19, 27 Stat. 510.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

California Debris Commission abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Army by Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1106, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4229, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-30980 Summary Calendar

BENNY C. HAYES, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-255

- - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benny C. Hayes appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that his right to due process was violated by judicial vindictiveness because the sentence imposed after his jury trial was greater than that given under a prior invalidated plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given by theNo. 97-30980 -2- district court. Hayes v. Cain , No. 97-0255-A (W.D. La. Aug. 8, 1997).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CENTRAL DAUPHIN SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Petitioner

v.

VALERIE HAWKINS, FOX 43 NEWS AND

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 16 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Published Opinion and

Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 1154 CD 2017, at 199 A.3d 1005 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018) entered on
December 10, 2018, affirming the Order of the Dauphin County Court

of Common Plea s at No. 2016

- CV

4401

- MP entered on August 1, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in determining that the video recording, which is maintained by the District and which captures student conduct being investigated by the District for the purpose of determining if discipline should be imposed on students, is not an education record under [the Family Educatio nal Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g].

The Commonwealth Court’s order is VACATED , and this matter is REMANDED for

additional proceedings consistent with Easton Area Sch. Dist. v. Miller , ___ A.3d ___,

2020 WL 3281099 (Pa. 2020)

. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue.
Issue Date: 03/13/07 07-010 -1-

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 07-010

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IP 92701 03/14/94 IP 92701 03/13/07

2. TI 2800/039 10/13/06 ---------- ----------

TRAINING: None

REMARKS: IP 92701 (Followup) has been revised to be applicable to IMC - 2514,

“Light Water Reactor Inspection Program -- Startup Testing Phase.”

2800/039 (Information Collection: Release of Individuals Containing

Unsealed Byproduct Material or Implants Containing Byproduct Material)

has been deleted. In accordance with the completion schedule, a review

was completed by Headquarters staff in January 2007, three months from

the date of issuance. It was determined that enough data has been

obtained for an adequate statistical sample for the study.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
---

Exhibit 15.1







INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





We consent to the use of our report dated September 26, 2008 on
the consolidated financial statements of Teryl Resources Corp. as at May 31,
2008 and 2007, and for the years ended May 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 that are
included in the Company's Annual Report Form 20-F filing.

In addition, we consent to the reference to us under the
heading Statement by Experts in the Annual Report.



|Vancouver, Canada | Morgan & Company   
|----------------- | ---------------------
|                  |                      
|November 26, 2008 | Chartered Accountants







---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2072

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 

penalty in the computation of the income tax on Social Security benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2003

Mr. FOLEY (for himself, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. PAUL, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, 

Mr. BACHUS, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. NEY, Mr. ENGLISH, 

Mr. PLATTS, Mr. MCHUGH, Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico, Mr. SOUDER, 

Mr. NETHERCUTT, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. HAYWORTH, and Ms. GINNY

BROWN-WAITE of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the marriage penalty in the computation of the income 

tax on social security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Mar5 riage Penalty Elimination Act of 2003’’.
2

•HR 2072 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN COM2 PUTATION OF INCOME TAX ON SOCIAL SECU3 RITY BENEFITS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 86 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security 

6 and tier 1 railroad retirement benefits) is amended to read 

7 as follows: 

8 ‘‘(c) BASE AMOUNT AND ADJUSTED BASE

9 AMOUNT.—For purposes of this section—

10 ‘‘(1) BASE AMOUNT.—The term ‘base amount’ 

11 means—

12 ‘‘(A) $50,000 in the case of a joint return, 

13 and 

14 ‘‘(B) $25,000 in any other case. 

15 ‘‘(2) ADJUSTED BASE AMOUNT.—The term ‘ad16 justed base amount’ means—

17 ‘‘(A) $68,000 in the case of a joint return, 

18 and 

19 ‘‘(B) $34,000 in any other case.’’

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 December 31, 2002.

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER III—GRANTS AND OTHER PROVISIONS
§ 731.202 Criteria for making suitability determinations. ( a ) *General.* OPM, or an agency to which OPM has delegated authority, must base its suitability determination on the presence or absence of one or more of the specific factors (charges) in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Specific factors.* In determining whether a person is suitable for Federal employment, only the following factors will be considered a basis for finding a person unsuitable and taking a suitability action: ( 1 ) Misconduct or negligence in employment;
( 2 ) Criminal or dishonest conduct;
( 3 ) Material, intentional false statement, or deception or fraud in examination or appointment;
( 4 ) Refusal to furnish testimony as required by § 5.4 of this chapter;
( 5 ) Alcohol abuse, without evidence of substantial rehabilitation, of a nature and duration that suggests that the applicant or appointee would be prevented from performing the duties of the position in question, or would constitute a direct threat to the property or safety of the applicant or appointee or others;
( 6 ) Illegal use of narcotics, drugs, or other controlled substances without evidence of substantial rehabilitation;
( 7 ) Knowing and willful engagement in acts or activities designed to overthrow the U.S. Government by force; and
( 8 ) Any statutory or regulatory bar which prevents the lawful employment of the person involved in the position in question.
( c ) *Additional considerations.* OPM and agencies must consider any of the following additional considerations to the extent OPM or the relevant agency, in its sole discretion, deems any of them pertinent to the individual case: ( 1 ) The nature of the position for which the person is applying or in which the person is employed;
( 2 ) The nature and seriousness of the conduct;
( 3 ) The circumstances surrounding the conduct;
( 4 ) The recency of the conduct;
( 5 ) The age of the person involved at the time of the conduct;
( 6 ) Contributing societal conditions; and
( 7 ) The absence or presence of rehabilitation or efforts toward rehabilitation.
( d ) *Reciprocity.* An agency cannot make a new determination under this section for a person who has already been determined suitable or fit based on character or conduct unless a new investigation is required under § 731.104 or § 731.106, or no new investigation is required but the investigative record on file for the person shows conduct that is incompatible with the core duties of the relevant covered position.
[73 FR 20154, Apr. 15, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 66493, Nov. 11, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 247 (Thursday, December 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66674-66675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Klamath National Forest; California; Crawford Vegetation 
Management Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Withdrawal of notice of intent to prepare an environmental 
impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Klamath National Forest is withdrawing the Notice of 
Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 
Crawford Vegetation Management Project. The original NOI was published 
in the Federal Register on January 27, 2014 (79 FR 4323). Upon further 
evaluation, there are no expected significant impacts to the human 
environment associated with the project. As a result, the Klamath 
National Forest is now preparing an environmental assessment (EA). All 
comments previously received regarding this project will be retained 
and considered in the development of the EA. If it is determined that 
the project may have significant impacts, the EIS process will be 
reinitiated and a NOI will be published.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this notice and 
requests to be added to the project mailing list should be directed to 
Lisa Bousfield, Happy Camp/Oak Knoll Ranger District, 63822 State 
Highway 96, P.O. Box 377, Happy Camp, CA 96039; by telephone at (530) 
493-1766; or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#036f616c7670656a666f674365702d6566672d7670"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89e5ebe6fcfaefe0ece5edc9effaa7efeceda7fcfa">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who have previously submitted comments on this project 
will

[[Page 66675]]

remain on the project mailing list and do not need to contact the 
Forest.

    Dated: December 4, 2018.
Jennifer Eberlien,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2018-27970 Filed 12-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §10447. Definitions and grant conditions

In this subchapter the definitions and grant conditions in section 12291 of this title shall apply.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2008, as added Pub. L. 109–162, §3(c)(1), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2971.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796gg–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Another section 2008 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 2016 and is classified to section 10453 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2008 of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, formerly §2003, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40121(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1913; amended Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title I, §§1103(b)(3), 1109(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1496, 1502; renumbered §2008, Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title IV, §402(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1789; Pub. L. 108–405, title III, §310(b), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2276, related to definitions of terms in part T of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–162, §3(c)(1), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2971.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions and Grant Conditions Applicable to Division B of Pub. L. 106–386

Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, §1002, Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1491, as amended by Pub. L. 109–162, §3(d), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2972, provided that: "In this division [see section 1001 of Pub. L. 106–386, set out as a Short Title of 2000 Act note under section 10101 of this title] the definitions and grant conditions in section 40002 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 [34 U.S.C. 12291] shall apply."
### §305. Conduct of reexamination proceedings

After the times for filing the statement and reply provided for by section 304 have expired, reexamination will be conducted according to the procedures established for initial examination under the provisions of sections 132 and 133. In any reexamination proceeding under this chapter, the patent owner will be permitted to propose any amendment to his patent and a new claim or claims thereto, in order to distinguish the invention as claimed from the prior art cited under the provisions of section 301, or in response to a decision adverse to the patentability of a claim of a patent. No proposed amended or new claim enlarging the scope of a claim of the patent will be permitted in a reexamination proceeding under this chapter. All reexamination proceedings under this section, including any appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, will be conducted with special dispatch within the Office.

(Added Pub. L. 96–517, §1, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3016; amended Pub. L. 98–622, title II, §204(c), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3388; Pub. L. 112–29, §§3(j)(1), 20(j), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 290, 335.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §20(j), struck out "of this title" after "304", after "133", and after "301".

Pub. L. 112–29, §3(j)(1), substituted "Patent Trial and Appeal Board" for "Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences".

1984—Pub. L. 98–622, §204(c), substituted "Patent Appeals and Interferences" for "Appeals".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by section 3(j)(1) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to certain applications for patent and any patents issuing thereon, see section 3(n) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as an Effective Date of 2011 Amendment; Savings Provisions note under section 100 of this title.

Amendment by section 20(j) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98–622, set out as a note under section 41 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1981, and applicable to patents in force as of July 1, 1981, or issued thereafter, see section 8(b) of Pub. L. 96–517, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40995

Summary Calendar

 

STACEY B. MARTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DENNIS JONES,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-98-CV-216

- - - - - - - - - -

April 1, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stacey B. Martin, Texas prisoner # 554134, appeals the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e). Martin, a Muslim, argues that Dennis Jones violated

his First and Eighth Amendment rights and retaliated against him

after Martin flooded the run to protest the adequacy of his food

tray during Ramadan. 
No. 98-40995

-2-

We have reviewed the record and Martin’s brief and AFFIRM

the magistrate judge’s dismissal for essentially the same reasons

set forth by the magistrate judge. Martin v. Jones, No. C-98-CV216 (S.D. Tex. July 27, 1998).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB forthe period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Garrison, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The Report	fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the	Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material	respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

 

/s/ John C. Garrison                        

John C. Garrison

Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2005
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Agnes P. Faile et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Laura E. Purdy, Deceased, Appellants-Respondents. Highlands of White Plains, Inc., Respondent-Appellant; Hazel H. McKinney et al., Respondents.

Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 786.]
#### § 831.1401 Conditions for waiver.

Recovery of an overpayment from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund may be waived pursuant to section 8346(b), of title 5, United States Code, when the annuitant (a) is without fault and (b) recovery would be against equity and good conscience. Where it has been determined that the recipient of an overpayment is ineligible for waiver, the individual is nevertheless entitled to an adjustment in the recovery schedule if he/she shows that it would cause him/her financial hardship to make payment at the rate scheduled.