alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5301.103 Outside employment and activities. ( a ) *Prohibited outside employment and activities.* ( 1 ) An NSF employee may not receive, directly or indirectly, any salary, consulting fee, honorarium, or other form of compensation for services, or reimbursement of expenses, from an NSF award.
( 2 ) An NSF employee may not serve as principal investigator or project director under an NSF award.
( 3 ) An NSF employee may not receive, directly or indirectly, any honorarium or any other form of compensation, or reimbursement of expenses from anyone, other than the United States, for participating in an event supported by NSF funds.
( b ) *Prior approval of outside employment and activities.* ( 1 ) An employee shall obtain written approval from an agency designee before: ( i ) Engaging in compensated outside employment with any person or institution (including any for-profit, non-profit, or governmental organization) which does business or may reasonably be expected to do business with the NSF. For these purposes, “employment” means any form of non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the employee. It includes, but is not limited to, personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher, or speaker. It includes writing when done under an arrangement for publication of the written product; or
( ii ) Serving, with or without compensation, on a visiting committee with any institution that does business or may reasonably be expected to do business with NSF.
( 2 ) In addition to any prior approval required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, an employee shall obtain prior written approval: ( i ) From an ethics counselor in the Office of the General Counsel before participating, with or without compensation, as a policymaking officer of any research or educational institution or any scientific society or professional association; and
( ii ) From his Assistant Director or Office head before serving in a personal capacity as an organizer, director, proceedings editor, or session chairperson for a conference, workshop, or similar event supported by NSF funds, or before presenting a paper at such an event.
( 3 ) The approvals required by paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section shall be granted only upon a determination by the appropriate NSF official that the outside employment or activity is not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulations, including 5 CFR part 2635 and this part.
# L_2015157EN.01011001.xml

| 23.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 157/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 157/110

---

DECISION No 2/2014 OF THE EU-UKRAINE ASSOCIATION COUNCIL

of 15 December 2014

on the establishment of two Sub-Committees [2015/978]

THE EU-UKRAINE ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (1) (‘the Agreement’), and in particular Article 466 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 486 of the Agreement, parts of the Agreement have been applied provisionally as of 1 November 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 486 of the Agreement, parts of the Agreement have been applied provisionally as of 1 November 2014.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 466(2) of the Agreement the Association Council may decide to set up any special committee or body in specific areas necessary for the implementation of the Agreement to assist the Association Council in carrying out its duties. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 466(2) of the Agreement the Association Council may decide to set up any special committee or body in specific areas necessary for the implementation of the Agreement to assist the Association Council in carrying out its duties.

| (3) | In order to allow for expert level discussions on the key areas falling within the scope of the provisional application of the Agreement, two sub-committees should be established. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In order to allow for expert level discussions on the key areas falling within the scope of the provisional application of the Agreement, two sub-committees should be established.

| (4) | Upon agreement of the Parties, it should be possible to modify the list of sub-committees and the scope of the individual sub-committees, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Upon agreement of the Parties, it should be possible to modify the list of sub-committees and the scope of the individual sub-committees,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Sub-Committees listed in the Annex are hereby established.

Article 2

The Rules of Procedure of the Sub-Committees listed in the Annex are governed by Article 16 of the Rules of Procedure of the Association Committee and of Sub-Committees as adopted by Decision No 1/2014 of the EU-Ukraine Association Council.

Article 3

Upon agreement of the Parties the list of Sub-Committees set out in the Annex and the scope of individual Sub-Committees listed in the Annex can be modified.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2014.

For the Association Council

The Chair

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 161, 29.5.2014, p. 3.

1

---

ANNEX

LIST OF SUB-COMMITTEES

| (1) | Sub-Committee on Freedom, Security and Justice |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Sub-Committee on Freedom, Security and Justice

| (2) | Sub-Committee on Economic and Other Sector Cooperation. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Sub-Committee on Economic and Other Sector Cooperation.

---
# L_2016341EN.01006201.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/62

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 163/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2198]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/445 of 17 March 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 as regards technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/445 of 17 March 2015 amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 as regards technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Point 66ne (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| 1. | The following is added in the first indent (Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012):

  ‘, as amended by:






  — | 32015 R 0445: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/445 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

The following is added in the first indent (Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012):

‘, as amended by:

—

32015 R 0445: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/445 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 1).’

| 2. | The following indent is added:






  ‘— | 32015 R 0445: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/445 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The following indent is added:

‘—

32015 R 0445: Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/445 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) 2015/445 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 74, 18.3.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2075

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 1, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West 

Palm Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers 

Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 2075 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 1905 West Blue Heron Boulevard in West Palm 

4 Beach, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Judge Edward Rodgers Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 30, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
| | Exhibit 32.1
| | ------------

Certification
of Chief Executive Officerof Prime Medical Services, Inc.

This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Issuer).

| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  November 12, 2003.

| | /s/ Brad A. Hummel

Brad A. Hummel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Prime Medical Services, Inc.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 4(e)  



	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY	 	P. O. BOX 10648	 	BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA	 	35202-0648
	





RETURN OF PURCHASE PAYMENTS

VARIABLE ANNUITY DEATH BENEFIT RIDER  


We
are amending the Contract to which this rider is attached as described below: 


	1.
	The
provision entitled "Death Benefit" in the "DEATH BENEFIT" section of your Contract
is deleted in its entirety.



	2.
	The
following provisions are added to the "DEATH BENEFIT" section of your Contract. 



Death Benefit—The death benefit will be determined as of the end of the Valuation Period during which we receive due proof of death. The
death benefit will equal the greater of: 



	•
	the
Contract Value; or



	•
	aggregate
Purchase Payments less an adjustment for each surrender. 




For
the purpose of calculating the death benefit, the adjustment for each partial surrender will equal the amount that reduces the death benefit in the same proportion that the amount surrendered
reduced the Contract Value as of the Valuation Period during which that surrender was taken. 


The
maximum death benefit provided under this Rider will never exceed the Contract Value as of the end of the Valuation Period during which we receive due proof of death plus $1,000,000. 


Only
one death benefit is payable under this Contract even though the Contract may, under certain circumstances, continue beyond the time of an Owner's death. 



Enhanced Spousal Continuation Benefit

If a sole Beneficiary is the spouse of a deceased Owner and elects, in lieu of receiving the death benefit, to continue the Contract and become the new Owner as provided in the Contract, we will add
to the Contract Value an amount equal to the excess of the death benefit over the Contract Value, if any, as of the date we receive due proof of death. We will allocate that amount according to the
current Purchase Payment allocation instructions, but the amount we add will not be considered a Purchase Payment. 


Suspension of Benefits—For a period of one year after any change of ownership involving a natural person, the death benefit will equal the
Contract Value. 


Rider Termination—The Rider will automatically terminate upon the occurrence of any of the following events 



	(a)
	settlement
of a claim for the death benefit;



	(b)
	the
Contract Anniversary immediately after the oldest Owner attains Age {95};



	(c)
	a
cancellation, or full surrender of the Contract;



	(d)
	annuitization.






Signed
for the company and made a part of the contract as of the Effective date. 


PROTECTIVE
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 



	


 



Secretary

	
 	

 




1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Samuel Friedman, Appellant, against City of New York, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



|In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clixster Mobile Group Inc a Texas corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months period ending March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Clixster Mobile Group Inc, and will be retained by Clixster Mobile Group Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali
|---------------------------
|-------------------------- 
|Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali    
|Chief Financial Officer    
|June 23, 2014
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1502 V

Filed: August 13, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

MIYEITA MAGEE

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

petitioner.

Voris Edward Johnson , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On September 28, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 23, 2017, petitioner suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine
Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the
disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned

agrees that the iden tified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from
public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this
case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management
and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 10 0 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012 ).2

On August 6, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent co ncludes that petitioner “ suffered a Table injury of left

SIRVA

. ” Id. at 5 . Respondent further agrees that “ petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation un der the Act

. ” Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
### §12558. Service obligation

#### (a) Swearing in

Upon satisfactory completion of the participant's course of education and training program established in section 12557 of this title and meeting the requirements of the police force to which the participant is assigned, a participant shall be sworn in as a member of the police force to which the participant is assigned pursuant to the State Police Corps plan, and shall serve for 4 years as a member of that police force.

#### (b) Rights and responsibilities

A participant shall have all of the rights and responsibilities of and shall be subject to all rules and regulations applicable to other members of the police force of which the participant is a member, including those contained in applicable agreements with labor organizations and those provided by State and local law.

#### (c) Discipline

If the police force of which the participant is a member subjects the participant to discipline such as would preclude the participant's completing 4 years of service, and result in denial of educational assistance under section 12555 of this title, the Director may, upon a showing of good cause, permit the participant to complete the service obligation in an equivalent alternative law enforcement service and, if such service is satisfactorily completed, section 12555(d)(1)(B)(iii) of this title shall not apply.

#### (d) Layoffs

If the police force of which the participant is a member lays off the participant such as would preclude the participant's completing 4 years of service, and result in denial of educational assistance under section 12555 of this title, the Director may permit the participant to complete the service obligation in an equivalent alternative law enforcement service and, if such service is satisfactorily completed, section 12555(d)(1)(B)(iii) of this title shall not apply.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XX, §200109, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2055.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14098 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

133880 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan GWENDOLYN JONES, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133880 COA: 272746 WCAC: 04-000200 COMERICA, INC., and FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of January 30, 2008, the applic ation for leave to appeal the March 29, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pending the decision in Stokes v Chrysler LLC (Docket No. 133880). On or der of the Court, the ca se having been decided on June 12, 2008, 481 Mi ch 266 (2008), the application is again cons idered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (W CAC) for reconsideration in light of Stokes. The WCAC may remand this case to the Bo ard of Magistrates for the taking of additional proofs and for further fi ndings upon the request of a party.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

C AVANAGH , J., would deny leave to appeal.

W EAVER , J., would grant leave to appeal.

t0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk