alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                        DIAMOND TRIUMPH AUTO GLASS, INC.

          AMENDMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN DIAMOND
       TRIUMPH AUTO GLASS, INC. AND RICHARD RUTTA DATED AS OF NOVEMBER 17,
                             2003 (THE "AGREEMENT")

It is hereby certified that:

                  1. Diamond Triumph Auto Glass, Inc. (hereinafter called the
         "Corporation") and Richard Rutta (the "Executive") mutually agree to
         amend the terms of the agreement by and between the corporation and the
         executive dated as of November 17, 2003

                  2. Section 4.1, Compensation, shall be amended effective
         March15, 2004, for base salary as defined in the agreement. The new
         base salary shall be $52,000 per annum.

                  3. All other items in the agreement shall remain unchanged.

Signed on March 15, 2004

                                           DIAMOND TRIUMPH AUTO GLASS, INC

                                       BY: /s/ Kenneth Levine
                                          -------------------------------
                                           NAME:  KENNETH LEVINE
                                           TITLE: CO-CHAIRMAN

                                            /s/ Richard Rutta
                                          -------------------------------
                                            RICHARD RUTTA
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

###### Office of Governmentwide Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of Governmentwide Policy, GSA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The General Services Administration, Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, has revised SF 129, Solicitation Mailing List Application. The data on this form is now collected on the following Web site:                         *http://www.ccr.gov*. This Web site is the official form. In July of 2003, the paper construction was cancelled and can no longer be used. Effective immediately, data can only be submitted through the above-cited Web site. No paper form will be accepted.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Regulatory and Federal Assistance Publication Division, (202) 501-4755.

# DATES:

Effective November 3, 2004.

Dated: October 28, 2004.

Barbara M. Williams,

Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-24526  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
### **CHAPTER 1509—NATIONAL COUNCIL ON RADIATION PROTECTION AND MEASUREMENTS**

Sec.
150901.
Organization.
150902.
Purposes.
150903.
Membership.
150904.
Governing body.
150905.
Powers.
150906.
Restrictions.
150907.
Principal office.
150908.
Records and inspection.
150909.
Statement required in audit report.
150910.
Service of process.
150911.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
150912.
Distribution of assets on dissolution or final liquidation.
#### Charles M. Henderson, Appellee, v. Frank Blakesley, Appellant.

Gen. No. 5,875.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the County Court of McHenry county; the Hon. David T. Smiley, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Charles M. Henderson against Frank Blakesley to recover $1.50 per rod for digging a ditch across a portion of defendant’s land. The suit was originally commenced before a justice of the peace where plaintiff recovered a judgment, and on appeal to the County Court plaintiff had a verdict and judgment for the same amount. From the latter judgment, defendant appeals.

*357Bernard Barnard, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Assumpsit, action of, § *89*
      ***
      *—when recovery for digging ditch sustained by evidence.*In an action to recover charges for digging a ditch across defendant’s land, plaintiff claimed that the work was done under an express contract that he was to be paid a certain sum per rod, and defendant claimed that he made no such contract but that he gave plaintiff permission to cross his land with the ditch if a third party, who was benefited by the ditch as an outlet, would pay for it, and that plaintiff said he would charge the work to the third party: *Held*that a verdict for plaintiff was sustained by the evidence.

2. Evidence, § *476*
      ***
      *—number of witnesses as determining weight of evidence.*It is not the law that if the number of witnesses on each side of an issue is equal the evidence is therefore evenly balanced, and that he who has the affirmative of the issue must fail.

3. Appeal and erbor, § *1009*
      ***
      *—when irregularity in impanelment of jury not presented for review.*Irregularity in the impanelment of the jury is not presented for review where it is not shown in the bill of exceptions and it does not appear that there were any objections to the course pursued.

4. Appeal and ereob, § *1560*
      ***
      *—when refusal of requested instruction harmless.*Refusal of a requested instruction which was not based upon any proof and was against appellant’s interest, *held*harmless.

5. Contracts, § *393*
      ***
      *—when requested instruction properly refused.*In an action to recover charges for digging a ditch, an instruction requested by defendant stated that if the minds of the parties did not come together upon all the terms and conditions of the alleged contract plaintiff could not recover. *Held*that the instruction was too broad as applied to the case, the pleadings being oral and defendant testifying that plaintiff said nothing about the price, in which case it would appear that defendant retained a bill for the work, without objection, for such a time as to establish an admission and acquiescence" in the price charged.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-062 May 5, 2006

NRC SETS REVIEW SCHEDULE ON REVISED APPLICATION 

FOR NORTH ANNA EARLY SITE PERMIT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing the supplemented, revised application for an

Early Site Permit (ESP) from Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC (Dominion), concerning the North

Anna nuclear power plant site, near Mineral, Va. 

Dominion submitted its initial application on Sept. 25, 2003, and submitted a revised

application on Jan. 13, 2006, which was supplemented on April 13. The revision reflects changes to the

reactor design and the cooling water system referenced in the application. The supplement addresses

several aspects of the changes, including the new cooling tower system’s impact on both humans and

wildlife downstream from the site.

“With this additional information, we can now move forward in reviewing Dominion’s

proposal,” said William Beckner, Deputy Director of the Division of New Reactor Licensing in the

NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “The staff expects to finish its technical work on the

application by the end of this year.”

The NRC staff’s projected schedule includes issuing a supplement to its draft environmental

impact statement (EIS) in late July, with a public meeting near the plant to discuss the supplement in

August. The EIS is expected to be finalized by the end of this year. The staff expects to supplement its

safety evaluation report in August, with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards reviewing the

supplement late in the year. The updated review schedule is available on the NRC’s Web site at this

address: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/esp/north-anna.html#schedule .

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. If a permit

is granted, the applicant has up to 20 years to decide whether to build a new nuclear unit on the site and

to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction. The Atomic Safety and

Licensing Board must conclude a hearing, expected to last approximately a year, on the North Anna

ESP application before the agency’s final decision.

###
### §10337. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "child" means an individual under the age of 18 years; and

(2) the term "abuse" means physical or mental injury, sexual abuse or exploitation, or negligent treatment of a child.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1409, as added Pub. L. 101–647, title II, §241(a)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4813.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796aa–8 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 6801.104 Speculative dealings. [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,217,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,579,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,376,895
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,045,072
<PP&E>                                       2,662,431
<DEPRECIATION>                                 930,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,358,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,116,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,107
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,896,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,358,208
<SALES>                                     22,667,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,667,507
<CGS>                                       10,989,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,989,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,358,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,219,014
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,219,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,219,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1971

To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn-2 (Bolt-2). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2003

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn-2 (Bolt-2).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BOLTORN-2 (BOLT-2). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.05 Dendritic Polyester (CAS No. 

326794–49–4) 

(provided for in 

subheading 

3907.99.00) ....... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 
2

•HR 1971 IH 

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a conference call of the State Advisory Committee Chairpersons in the Western Region (Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Texas and Washington) will convene at 1 p.m. (p.s.t.) and adjourn at 2 p.m., Friday, November 19, 2004. The purpose of the conference call is to discuss regional civil rights issues and update information. This conference call is available to the public through the following call-in number: 1-800-473-7795, access code number 28699764. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls not initiated using the provided call-in number or over wireless lines and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls using the call-in number over land-line connections. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and access code.

To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting Thomas Pilla of the Western Regional Office, (213) 894-3437, by 3 p.m. on Thursday, November 18, 2004.

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission.

Dated at Washington, DC, October 29, 2004.

Ivy L. Davis,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 04-24777 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
### **CHAPTER 501—DAUGHTERS OF UNION VETERANS OF THE CIVIL WAR 1861–1865**

Sec.
50101.
Definition.
50102.
Organization.
50103.
Purposes.
50104.
Membership.
50105.
Governing body.
50106.
Powers.
50107.
Restrictions.
50108.
Duty to maintain tax-exempt status.
50109.
Records and inspection.
50110.
Service of process.
50111.
Liability for acts of officers and agents.
50112.
Annual report.
### §110305. Restrictions

(a) Stock and Dividends.—The corporation may not issue stock or declare or pay a dividend.

(b) Political Activities.—The corporation or a director or officer as such may not contribute to, support, or assist a political party or candidate for public office.

(c) Distribution of Income or Assets.—The income or assets of the corporation may not inure to the benefit of, or be distributed to, a director or officer. This subsection does not prevent the payment of compensation to an officer or employee in an amount approved by the executive committee of the corporation.

(d) Loans.—The corporation may not make a loan to a director, officer, or employee. Directors who vote for or assent to making a loan to a director, officer, or employee, and officers who participate in making the loan, are jointly and severally liable to the corporation for the amount of the loan until it is repaid.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1370.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 110305(a) | 36:921. | Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–903, §§8, 9, 11, 72 Stat. 1740. |
| 110305(b) | 36:919. | |
| 110305(c) | 36:918(a). | |
| 110305(d) | 36:918(b). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "any shares of" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), the word "otherwise" is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "inure to the benefit of" are substituted for "inure to" for consistency in the revised title. The words "This subsection does not prevent" are substituted for "Nothing in this section, however, shall be construed to prevent" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
§ 297.202 Methods of access. ( a ) The methods for allowing access to records, when such access has been granted by the Office or agency, are: ( 1 ) Inspection in person in the designated office during the hours specified by the Office or agency; or
( 2 ) Transfer of records at the option of the Office or agency to another more convenient Federal facility.
( b ) Generally, Office of Personnel Management offices will not furnish certified copies of records. When copies are to be furnished, they may be provided as determined by the Office and may require payment of any fee levied in accordance with the Office's established fee schedule.
( c ) When the requester seeks to obtain original documentation, the Office reserves the right to limit the request to copies of the original records. Original records should be made available for review only in the presence of the system manager or designee. An agency should consult with the Office when it receives a request for original documentation. Section 2701(a) of title 18 of the United States Code makes it a crime to conceal, mutilate, obliterate, or destroy any record filed in a public office, or to attempt to do so.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1847

Concerning denial of passports to noncustodial parents subject to State arrest 

warrants in cases of nonpayment of child support. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2003

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

Concerning denial of passports to noncustodial parents subject to State arrest warrants in cases of nonpayment 

of child support.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Denial of Passports 

5 to Noncustodial Parents in Cases of Nonpayment of Child 

6 Support’’. 
2

•HR 1847 IH 

1 SEC. 2. DENIAL OF PASSPORTS TO NONCUSTODIAL PAR2 ENTS SUBJECT TO STATE ARREST WARRANTS 

3 IN CASES OF NONPAYMENT OF CHILD SUP4 PORT. 

5 The Secretary of State is authorized to refuse a pass6 port or revoke, restrict, or limit a passport in any case 

7 in which the Secretary of State determines or is informed 

8 by competent authority that the applicant or passport 

9 holder is a noncustodial parent who is the subject of an 

10 outstanding State warrant of arrest for nonpayment of 

11 child support, where the amount in controversy is not less 

12 than $5,000.

Æ
### Part B—Transitional Living Grant Program

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§7272(2), 7273(f), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4454, 4455, added part B heading, set out above, and struck out "Part B—Records" heading.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part B of title III of Pub. L. 93–415 consisted of former section 321, prior to amendment by Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §§7272(2), 7273(e)(2), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4454, 4455.
No: II-08-031 May 13, 2008 

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov 

 Roger Hannah (404)562-4417 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2007 PERFORMANCE OF 

HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT MAY 20 

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Tuesday, 

May 20, with representatives of Progress Energy to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety 

performance during 2007 at the Shearon Harris nuclear plant, located about 20 miles southwest 

of Raleigh, N.C. 

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:45 p.m. in the 

New Horizons Fellowship, 820 E. Williams Street (Highway 55) in Apex. The formal 

presentation at 6:45 will be preceded by an open house and poster session from 5 until 6:30 p.m. 

NRC staff will be available during the open house and after the presentation to answer questions 

from the public on the safety performance of the Harris plant, as well as the NRC’s role in 

ensuring safe plant operation. 

“The NRC continually inspects and reviews the performance of Harris and all 

commercial nuclear plants, issuing inspection reports throughout the year and an overall 

assessment at year’s end,” NRC Region II Administrator Luis Reyes said. “This meeting is an 

opportunity to discuss our assessment with the company, local officials and people living near 

the plant, and to answer any questions they may have.” 

The NRC said the Harris plant operated safely during the 2007 assessment period, from 

Jan. 1 through Dec. 31. All inspection findings were “green” and of very low safety significance. 

All performance indicators showed the plant operating at a level that does not require additional 

NRC oversight. Therefore, the NRC is conducting only its regular, baseline inspections at the 

plant during 2008. 

When assessing nuclear plant performance, the NRC uses color-coded performance 

indicators and inspection findings. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” 

“yellow” or “red” based on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II 

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303 

Web Site: www.nrc.gov 
A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2007 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2007q4.pdf . 

Current performance information for the Harris plant is available on the NRC web site at: 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html . 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.