alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Contains Confidential Business Information

Note:  The PMN substance, CAS 12005‐25‐3, is a component in a CSA product mixture at approximately

30% concentration.  It is not imported or handled in its pure state.  All physico‐chemical measurements

or estimates were based on the CSA product mixture, and not on the pure PMN substance.   

Property Value Measured

or

Estimated

CBI if

marked

with an X

Physical state Solid Measured X

Vapor Pressure Not applicable Estimated X

Density 2.95 g/cm3 Measured X

Solubility Slightly water soluble‐hydrates to form ettringite Measured X

Melting Temperature >450C Estimated X

Boiling/Sublimation

Temperature

>450C Estimated X

Dissociation Constant Not applicable Estimated X

Octanol/water partition

coefficient

Not applicable Estimated X

Henry’s Law Constant Not applicable Estimated X

Volatilization from

water

Not applicable Estimated X

Volatilization from soil Not applicable Estimated X

pH (in water) 11‐13 Measured X

Flammability Non‐flammable Estimated X

Explodability Non‐explosive Estimated X

Particle Size

Distribution

See separate attachment for details;

Approximately 1‐200 m diameter;  

medium diameter approximately 14m

Measured X
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John Robertson, Chief Financial Officer* of Teryl Resources
Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Teryl Resources Corp. for
  the year ended May 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
  78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Teryl Resources Corp.

|Richmond, BC Canada     
|------------------------
|by: /s/ John Robertson  
|August 7, 2007          
|John Robertson          
|Chief Financial Officer*
|(*as of May 31, 2005)   



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Teryl Resources Corp. and will be retained by Teryl
Resources Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
### §24. Big Tarkio River, Missouri

The Big Tarkio River, in the counties of Holt and Atchison, in the State of Missouri, is declared to be not a navigable water of the United States within the meaning of the laws enacted by Congress for the preservation and protection of such waters.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(Feb. 15, 1910, ch. 33, §§1, 2, 36 Stat. 194.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The first sentence hereof is section 1 and the last sentence section 2 of act Feb. 15, 1910, entitled "An Act to declare Big Tarkio River, in Holt and Atchison counties, Missouri, nonnavigable".
B.C.D. 04-57 NOV 2 3 2004

# EMPLOYER STATUS DECISION

Cleveland Commercial Railroad Company, LLC

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board 

concerning the status of Cleveland Commercial Railroad Company,

LLC (CCRC) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. § 231, et sea.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351, et sea.) (RUIA)). CCRC has not

heretofore been ruled to be an employer under the RRA and RUIA.

Jami Bishop, attorney for CCRC, advised that CCRC began actual

operations on July 9, 2004 and that its three employees were first

compensated on August 21, 2004. Pursuant to a lease and

operating agreement between CCRC and Wheeling & Lake Erie

Railway Company (W&LE) (B.A. No. 3373), CCRC conducts line haul 

and switching operations over 10.4 miles of rail line owned by W & LE

in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, extending from milepost 15.5 at

Glenview to milepost 5.1 at Cleveland. That line was previously

w operated by Connotton Valley Railway, Inc. (B.A. No. 2283). Surface

Transportation Board (STB) authority for CCRC operations is set forth 

at STB Finance Docket No. 34521, decided July 30, 2004.

Section 1 (a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of

the Surface Transportation Board under Part A of subtitle

IV of Title 49 [45 U.S.C. § 231 (a)(l)(i)j.

Sections 1 (a) and 1 (b) of the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §§ 351 (a) and (b)) contain

substantially the same definition as does section 3231 of the

Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

BA#4281
-2-

Based on the information summarized above, it is determined

that Cleveland Commercial Railroad Company, LLC, became

an employer covered under the Railroad Retirement Act and

the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act on July 9, 2004, the

date on which actual operations began.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.

erome F. Kever
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for clearance of a revised information collection. Online OPM Form 1417, Combined Federal Campaign Results Form, is used to collect information from the 320 local CFC's around the country to verify campaign results. Revisions to the form clarify OPM's request for budgeted campaign costs and provide the ability to create a printer friendly copy of the report. 

We estimate 320 Online OPM Forms 1417 are completed annually. Each form takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 107 hours. 

Comments are particularly invited on: Whether this information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and whether it will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through the appropriate use of technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, Fax (202) 418-3251 or E-mail to                         *mbtoomey@opm.gov.*                         Please be sure to include a mailing address with your request.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—Curtis Rumbaugh, CFC Operations Manager, Office of CFC Operations, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 5450, Washington, DC 20415. 

Office of Personnel Management. 

Kay Coles James, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 04-24337 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-46-U
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert P. Akins,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cymer, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information.

 

b)             any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:   November 7, 2003     |
|-----------------------------------|
|                              |
|                              |
|                              | /s/ ROBERT P. AKINS |   |
| Robert P. Akins                   |
| Chairman, Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 12.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Byung-Moo Park, certify that:1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of hanarotelecomincorporated (the “Company”).2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 16, 2006        /s/ Byung-Moo Park      Byung-Moo Park  Chief Executive Officer
# L_2017308EN.01003901.xml

| 23.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/39

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 132/2016

of 3 June 2016

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2017/2150]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include cooperation concerning free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include cooperation concerning free movement of workers, coordination of social security systems and measures for migrants, including migrants from third countries.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2016, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In paragraphs 5 and 13 of Article 5 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, the words ‘and 2015’ are replaced by the words ‘, 2015 and 2016’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2016.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 June 2016.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

          Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
            And under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Richard David Scott, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarter Report on Form 10-QSB of Invicta Group,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date:  8-7-06                              By: /s/ Richard David Scott
                                               Richard David Scott
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<page>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, as the ``Walt Disney 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 120 
East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, and known as the Marceline 
Main Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Walt Disney Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Walt Disney Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Belknap,

June, 1897.

#### New Hampshire Asylum for the Insane *v.*Belknap County.

The state is chargeable with the support of an insane person transferred from the state prison to the asylum by order of the governor and council, until he is discharged therefrom according to law.

The state prison is not a “ hospital ” or “ other charitable institution,” within the meaning of c. 54, Laws 1895.

Assumpsit, for the support of John Dugan. Facts agreed. October 2, 1891, Dugan, then and for some time before commorant in Belknap county, was committed to the state prison for *175tbe term of three years, to which he was sentenced by the supreme court for that county, and since that time has been a pauper. April 25, 1894, by order of the governor and council, he was transferred from the prison to the asylum as an insane person. The governor and council notified the plaintiffs that the state would not be responsible for his support in the asylum after April 80, 1896, and the plaintiffs notified the defendants that after that time his support would devolve upon them. The action is for the expense of his support after April 30, 1896. He is not chargeable on any other county, or on any town or person.

*M A.*tf *G. B.*Hibbard, for the plaintiffs.

*William B.*Fellows, solicitor, for the defendants.

Carpenter, C. J.

“ The governor and council . . . may transfer any prisoner who is insane to the asylum for the insane, to be there kept at the expense of the state, whenever they are' satisfied that such . . . transfer will be conducive to the health and comfort of the person and the welfare of the public.” P. S.,. *c.*255, *s.*4. There is nothing in the statute indicating that the liability of the state for the support of a prisoner transferred to the asylum is to terminate at the end of the term for which he is sentenced. He is to be kept in the asylum at the state’s expense until he is discharged according to law. The place of his residence or settlement is immaterial. The state prison is not a “hospital” or “other charitable institution” within the meaning of the act of March 21, 1895, which provides that “Any person who shall become a pauper or public charge while at any orphans’ home, hospital, home for the aged, or other charitable institution, or within three months after leaving such institution, shall be chargeable for support to the county in which he last resided before entering such institution, unless such person has-a settlement in some town, or some other county is liable for his support.” Laws 1895, *c.*54. The act has no application to the.present question.

*Judgment for the*defendants.

All concurred.