alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Magic Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2006

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                                                                                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Gordon Scott Venters, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer). |
# L_2015104EN.01000102.xml

| 23.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/1

---

Information concerning the signature of the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Lebanon in Union programmes

The above Protocol between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon was signed in Brussels on 9 February 2015.

---
-4

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Mar 15, 2007 14:53

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION:

LTR-07-0174

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 03/14/2007

Jon Huntsman

UT-GOV

CHRM Dale Klein

Concerns program for licensing byproduct material

EDO

DEDMRS

DEDR

DEDIA

AO

Q')V

Appropriate

RF

12/2-9/2006

No

Immediate release to the public via SECY/EDO/DPC

ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
X~fA-o'k O/7~

STATE OF UTAH

JON M. HUNTSMAN, JR. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR GARY R. HERBERT

GOVERNOR SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH LIEUTENANT GOVEiNOR

841 14-2220

December 29, 2006

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 651(e) of the Energy Policy

Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive

materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections I Ie.(3) and I I e.(4) of the Atomic Energy Act of

1954, as amended.

In 1984, the State of Utah entered into an Agreement with the Commission under Section 274b.

of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that Agreement, the State licenses byproduct

material as defined in Section I le.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, the State licenses the

naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the

program for licensing 1 e.(1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the licensing

program that would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy. Further, we intend to continue to

license the new byproduct material under this same program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the State of Utah has a program for licensing

byproduct material, as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section I I e. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,

as amended, that is adequate to protect the public health and safety, and that the State intends to continue

to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the Transition of

Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material."

Sincere.

Ion M. Huntsman, Jr.

Governor
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22


                                                     January 12, 2004


Mr. Earl G. Graves
Chairman and CEO
Earl G. Graves Ltd.
130 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10011

Dear Earl:

         This will confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of
your director's fees in 2004.

         1. All director's fees and retainers ("Fees") payable to you in
connection with your service on the boards of directors (including committees of
such boards) of AMR Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004 , will be deferred and paid to you in
accordance with this letter agreement.

         2. Fees will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with
the Directors' Stock Equivalent Purchase Plan, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A (the "Plan").

         3. Within 30 days of the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation, the Stock Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be
converted to cash and paid to you by multiplying the number of such Stock
Equivalent Units by the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation.

         4. AMR's obligation to make the payment pursuant to paragraph 3 hereof
will not be released or modified by reason of your death. In such event, the
cash payment contemplated by paragraph 3 will be made to your named beneficiary
under the Director's Term Life Insurance Policy maintained by the Corporation.



<PAGE>

         If the foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one
of the originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.



                                                         Very truly yours,



                                                         Charles D. MarLett
                                                         Corporate Secretary


Accepted and agreed:




   /s/ Earl G Graves
----------------------------
Earl G. Graves


1/20/2004
----------------------------
Date
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.704 Duration of reemployment rights. ( a ) *Termination of authority.* Rights are not granted to persons who leave Federal employment for employment with a tribal organization after the date (December 31, 1985, at present) specified in section 105(e) of the Indian Self-Determination Act (88 Stat. 2209).
( b ) *Maximum period of entitlement.* Entitlement to reemployment terminates at the end of 6 years following the date employment commences in the tribal organization unless exercised or otherwise terminated before that time as provided in this subpart.
§ 1207.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with a disability.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with parties by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 1207.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(r)

                    Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement
                    ---------------------------------------

     Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of September 19,
1997 (the "Agreement"),  between United Rentals, Inc. (subsequently renamed
United Rentals (North America), Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and John N. Milne ("Executive").

The Company and Executive agree that following new subparagraph shall be added
following Paragraph 6(d):

     (e)  The Company and Bradley S. Jacobs ("Jacobs") are parties to an
     Employment Agreement dated September 19, 1997 (the "Jacobs Agreement").
     Paragraph 6(a)(iii)(D) of the Jacobs Agreement provides that Jacobs may
     terminate the Jacobs Agreement for "Good Reason" (as defined in the Jacobs
     Agreement).  If (1) Jacobs terminates the Jacobs Agreement for Good Reason
     (as defined in the Jacobs Agreement), (2) the circumstances constituting
     such "Good Reason" are described in clause (i) of the definition of such
     term in the Jacobs Agreement, and (3) concurrently therewith or during the
     90-day period that commences on the date of such termination, Executive
     resigns as an employee of the Company (even if not for Good Reason) or his
     employment with the Company otherwise terminates, then the Company shall be
     required to pay to Executive a severance payment equal to 10.91 times the
     sum of (x) the Executive's annual Base Salary in effect at the time of
     termination plus (y) the highest annual cash bonus (if any) paid by the
     Company to Executive during the three-year period preceding the date of
     termination. Such severance payment shall be payable in a lump sum payment
     within fifteen (15) days of the termination of Employee's employment.  If
     the Company is required to make a payment pursuant to this paragraph 6(e),
     the Company shall not be required to make the payment provided for in
     paragraph 6(a)(iii).

Except as specifically set forth above, the Agreement remains unmodified and in
full force and effect:

Dated: December 24, 1999

UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC.

By
   --------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------

------------------------
John N. Milne
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-137 October 31, 2006

NRC RENEWS OPERATING LICENSES FOR 

NINE MILE POINT UNITS 1 AND 2 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Nine Mile Point

Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, for an additional 20 years.

Nine Mile Point is located on the shore of Lake Ontario about five miles northeast of Oswego,

N.Y. The licensee, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station LLC (now a subsidiary of Constellation Nuclear),

submitted its license renewal application May 26, 2004. With the renewal, the license for Unit 1 is

extended until Aug. 22, 2029, and the license for Unit 2 is extended until Oct. 31, 2046.

The NRC’s environmental review for this license renewal is described in a site-specific

supplement to the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear

Power Plants” (NUREG-1437, Supplement 24), issued in May. The review concluded there were no

environmental impacts that would preclude renewal of the licenses for environmental reasons. Public

meetings to discuss the environmental review were held near the plant Sept. 21, 2004, and Nov. 17,

2005.

After carefully reviewing the plant’s safety systems and specifications, the staff concluded that

there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had

demonstrated effectively the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. The “Safety Evaluation

Report Related to the License Renewal of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2”

(NUREG-1900) was published in June. In addition, NRC conducted inspections of the plant to verify

information submitted by the licensee. The reports relating to the Nine Mile Point renewal are available

on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/nine-mile-pt.html .

On Aug. 2, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards - an independent body of technical

experts which advises the Commission - issued its recommendation that the operating licenses for Nine

Mile Point be renewed. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the Safety Aspects of the

License Renewal Application for the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.” This document

is available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2006/ .
The Nine Mile Point renewals bring the total number of renewals to 46 reactor units. A

complete listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

### 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### Gibby *vs.*Hall and others.

An injunction will not be dissolved upon the hearing upon the bill and answer, when the answer is unsatisfactory as to any matter which is an essential part of the complainant’s equity.

Bill for injunction to stay a suit at law. Motion to dissolve the injunction on bill and answer.

*Mr. G. JR.*Lindsay, for motion.

*Mr. Joel Parlcer, contra.*

The Chancello».

The complainant, who was the owner of mortgaged premises which were advertised to be sold under a decree of foreclosure of this court, swears that just before the time appointed for the sale, October 27th, 1875, the defendant, Hall, accepted a deed from him and his wife for the premises, and agreed, in consideration of the conveyance, to stop the sale and deliver up his bond to them. The bond and mortgage were given by the complainant to Hall in 1870, to secure the payment of part of the purchase money of the mortgaged premises, which were then conveyed by the latter to the former. Though Hall, in 1872, assigned the bond and mortgage to his daughter, Mrs. Marsh, and claims that he was, therefore, from that time no longer interested in them, yet it appears that he entertained negotiations, on the part of the complainant, on the subject of the proposed conveyance of the property to him in satisfaction thereof. The property was struck off at the sheriff’s sale to Mrs. Marsh for $300, subject to prior encumbrances. According to the complainant, it did not bring one-half of its value. A few days after the sale, suit was begun against the complainant on his bond, and the bill is filed to stay that action.

*283The complainant’s allegation in the bill that Hall told him, during the negotiation for the re-conveyance of the property, that notwithstanding the assignment to- his daughter, he was still the owner of the bond and mortgage, derives some support from the fact that immediately after the sheriff’s sale, Mrs. Marsh and her husband conveyed the property to Hall at the price at which it was struck off to her. Besides, it would appear, from the bill and answer, that Hall was permitted to deal with the bond and mortgage in the negotiations for re-conveyance, as though they were his own, if they were, indeed, the property of his daughter. The answer is not satisfactory as to the alleged agreement with Hall, by which, in consideration of the re-conveyance, he agreed to stop the sale and deliver up the bond. The deed was retained by Hall, and ' is still in his possession. Under the circumstances of the case, the injunction should be retained until the hearing.
Exhibit
32.1




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO) 1350




YUHE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Yuhe International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gao Zhentao, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 31, 2009




/s/
      Gao ZhentaoGao
      ZhentaoChief
      Executive Officer,
director
§ 630.1101 Purpose, applicability, and administration. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart provides regulations to implement section 6391 of title 5, United States Code, and must be read together with section 6391. Section 6391 of title 5, United States Code, provides that in the event of a major disaster or emergency, as declared by the President, that results in severe adverse effects for a substantial number of employees, the President may direct the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to establish an emergency leave transfer program under which an employee may donate unused annual leave for transfer to employees of his or her agency or to employees in other agencies who are adversely affected by such disaster or emergency.
( b ) *Applicability.* This subpart applies to any individual who is defined as an “employee” in 5 U.S.C. 6331(1) and who is employed in— ( 1 ) An Executive agency; or
( 2 ) The Judicial branch.
( c ) *Administration.* The head of each agency having employees subject to this subpart is responsible for the proper administration of this subpart. Each Federal agency must establish and administer procedures to permit the voluntary transfer of annual leave consistent with this subpart.
#### William H. Jessup et al., Appellants, *v.*Jacob Steurer, Respondent.

(Argued December 11, 1878;

decided December 20, 1878.)

This action was brought to recover for a quantity of malt alleged to have been purchased by defendant of plaintiffs. The malt was sold to one Gescheidt and credit given to him, but plaintiffs’ evidence was to the effect that Gescheidt was in fact the agent of defendant in making a purchase. *Held,*that plaintiffs, although they supposed Gescheidt to be the purchaser, yet if they afterwards discovered that defendant *614■ was the principal, were entitled to resort to defendant for payment. *(Meeker*v. *Olaghorn,*44 N". Y., 349.)

The principal controversy oil the appeal was as to a ruling of the trial court holding that defendant was not liable for malt had by Gesolieidt, prior to April 9, 1872, and excluding it from the consideration of the jury. *Held,*error, as plaintiffs’ evidence was substantially the same as to malt purchased before as after that date, and it being- disputed by defendant’s evidence was for the jury to determine.

*Samuel Jones*for appellants.

*Henry Daily, jr.*for respondent.

Earl, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial. All concur.

Judgment reversed.
§ 1201.25 Content of agency response. The agency response to an appeal must contain the following: ( a ) The name of the appellant and of the agency whose action the appellant is appealing;
( b ) A statement identifying the agency action taken against the appellant and stating the reasons for taking the action;
( c ) All documents contained in the agency record of the action;
( d ) Designation of and signature by the authorized agency representative; and
( e ) Any other documents or responses requested by the Board.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip De Lavore, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ.
§ 720.305 Agency accomplishment reports. ( a ) Not later than December 1 of each year, agencies must submit an annual accomplishment report on their disabled veterans affirmative action program to the Office of Personnel Management, covering the previous fiscal year.
( b ) Agency annual accomplishment reports must describe: ( 1 ) Methods used to recruit and employ disabled veterans, especially those who are 30 percent or more disabled.
( 2 ) Methods used to provide or improve internal advancement opportunities for disabled veterans.
( 3 ) A description of how the activities of major operating components and field installations were monitored, reviewed, and evaluated.
( 4 ) An explanation of the agency's progress in implementing its affirmative action plan during the fiscal year. Where progress has not been shown, the report will cite reasons for the lack of progress, along with specific plans for overcoming cited obstacles to progress.
#### § 206.4 Notification of other agencies.

For each investigation subject to provisions of part 206, the Commission will transmit copies of the petition, request, resolution, or Commission motion as required by the relevant statute, along with a copy of the notice of investigation.

[67 FR 8190, Feb. 22, 2002]