alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-030 August 23. 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING AUGUST 31 ON LICENSE APPLICATION

FOR HAWAIIAN COMMERCIAL IRRADIATOR

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting on Aug. 31 in

Honolulu, Hawaii, to discuss how the agency will review the application submitted by Pa’ina

Hawaii, LLC, a Hawaiian owned company, to build and operate an underwater pool-type

commercial irradiator near the Honolulu International Airport.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Ala Moana Hotel, 410 Atkinson Drive. The

purpose of the meeting is for the NRC staff to provide information on the process that will be

used to review the application submitted by Pa’ina Hawaii on June 27.

The device would primarily be used for the irradiation of fresh fruit and vegetables bound

for the mainland from the Hawaiian islands. During use, materials to be irradiated are loaded

into a stainless steel chamber, then lowered into a water-filled pool where they are exposed to

radiation. The company also plans to irradiate cosmetics and pharmaceutical products, conduct

research and development activities and irradiate a wide range of other materials as specifically

approved by the NRC.

This will be the first of several public meetings the NRC staff plans to hold in Hawaii to

enhance public awareness of the agency’s independent regulatory role in protecting public health

and safety and the environment, solicit public comments on the irradiator application, and

encourage public involvement in the regulatory process.

“The NRC staff looks forward to meeting with members of the community and

explaining the process we will use in reviewing this license application,” said Region IV

Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. 
A copy of the license application (with security-sensitive information redacted) will be

available through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System

(ADAMS). Use ADAMS number ML052060372. Help in using ADAMS is available by

contacting the NRC Public Document Room staff at 1-800-397-4209, or by sending a message

to: pdr@nrc.gov.

In addition, copies of the application will be available for inspection at the Honolulu

Public Library and the library of the University of Hawaii. 

###
Belknap,

Dec., 1896.

#### Iona Savings Bank *v.*Boynton.

A married woman may bind lierself by a promissory note given to obtaii money for her husband’s use.

Assumpsit, on the promissory note of the defendant, a married woman. Pacts found by the court. The note was signed by her at the request of her husband, who told her he needed the money,. She signed the note to help her husband in his business, and authorized him to secure its discount and dispose of the proceeds. The defendant’s husband applied to the plaintiffs for a loan of $5,000, with sixty shares of the capital stock of the Tilton Hosiery Company as collateral. They declined to make the loan, but told him that if his wife desired to borrow that amount with the same security, the loan would be made. Shortly afterward he brought to the bank the note in suit, with the collateral above-named, and received the amount of the plaintiffs. He deposited' the avails in the Citizens’ National Bank to the credit of theTilton Hosiery Company, of which he was treasurer. The defendant never met or had any talk with any officer of the bank relative to the loan. Upon the foregoing facts the court found a verdict for the plaintiffs for the amount due on the note, and the-defendant excepted.

*William JB, Fellows*and *Edward B. S. Sanborn,*for the plaintiffs,.

*Walter I). Hardy, Fabius E. Elder,*and *Bingham, Mitchell ftBatchellor,*for the defendant.

*78Wallace, J.

The ease discloses that the plaintiffs refused to make the loan to the husband, but did make it to the wife alone upon a note signed by her to which the husband was not a party, and that the hiring of the money by the defendant from the plaintiffs was the independent contract of the wife as principal and not as the surety or guarantor of the husband. The fact that she hired the money with the intention of letting her husband have it to assist him in his business, and did so let him have it, did not impair or suspend her legal capacity to make the contract, or make it an undertaking for him or in his behalf within the meaning of the statute. *Parsons*v. *McLane, 64*N. H. 478; *Jones*v. *Holt,*64 N. H. 546; *Wells*v. *Foster,*64 N. H. 585.

*Exception overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §288. Action for infringement of a patent containing an invalid claim

Whenever a claim of a patent is invalid, an action may be maintained for the infringement of a claim of the patent which may be valid. The patentee shall recover no costs unless a disclaimer of the invalid claim has been entered at the Patent and Trademark Office before the commencement of the suit.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 813; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 112–29, §20(h), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 334.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §71 (R.S. 4922).

The necessity for a disclaimer to recover on valid claims is eliminated. See section 253.

Language is changed.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29 struck out ", without deceptive intention," after "Whenever".

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to proceedings commenced on or after that effective date, see section 20(l) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 2 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
### **CHAPTER 1403—THE MILITARY CHAPLAINS ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA**

Sec.
140301.
Organization.
140302.
Purposes.
140303.
Powers.
140304.
Exclusive right to name.
140305.
Annual report.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Richard F. Dalton, as Surviving Executor of John S. O’Leary, Deceased, Respondent. Joseph P. Kelly, as One of the Executors of Sarah D. O’Leary, Deceased, Appellant.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 766.]
### §313. Preliminary response to petition

If an inter partes review petition is filed under section 311, the patent owner shall have the right to file a preliminary response to the petition, within a time period set by the Director, that sets forth reasons why no inter partes review should be instituted based upon the failure of the petition to meet any requirement of this chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4604(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–568; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13202(c)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902; Pub. L. 112–29, §6(a), (c)(3)(A)(ii), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 300, 305.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Pub. L. 112–29, §6(c)(3)(A)(ii), which directed substitution of "it has been shown that there is a reasonable likelihood that the requester would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the request" for "a substantial new question of patentability affecting a claim of the patent is raised", was executed by making the substitution for "a substantial new question of patentability affecting a claim of a patent is raised", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 112–29, §6(a), amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "If, in a determination made under section 312(a), the Director finds that it has been shown that there is a reasonable likelihood that the requester would prevail with respect to at least 1 of the claims challenged in the request, the determination shall include an order for inter partes reexamination of the patent for resolution of the question. The order may be accompanied by the initial action of the Patent and Trademark Office on the merits of the inter partes reexamination conducted in accordance with section 314."

2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106–113, which enacted this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by section 6(a) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to any patent issued before, on, or after that effective date, with provisions for graduated implementation, see section 6(c)(2) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 311 of this title.

Amendment by section 6(c)(3)(A)(ii) of Pub. L. 112–29 effective Sept. 16, 2011, and applicable to requests for inter partes reexamination filed on or after Sept. 16, 2011, but before the effective date set forth in section 6(c)(2)(A) of Pub. L. 112–29, with continued applicability of prior provisions, see section 6(c)(3)(B), (C) of Pub. L. 112–29, set out as a note under section 312 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Nov. 29, 1999, and applicable to any patent issuing from an original application filed in the United States on or after that date, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4608(a)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 41 of this title.
Order filed, October 21, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00826-CV

____________

JAN R. MERKLIN, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellant

V.

JOHN NOVA LOMAX AND HOUSTON PRESS, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-19128

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 30, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Gina Wilburn, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




STATEMENT
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of NF Energy Saving
      Corporation of America (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Li, Gang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      that:




*
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




*
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/
      Li, Gang


Li,
      Gang


Chief
      Executive Officer








May
      15,
      2007







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
p.1 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

30) IV-C-3 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:46 AM Sheet 30 of 273 
P.2 

A-94-52 

IV-C-3 

Keith Barnett 

08/06/2001 11:19AM 

To: John Schweitzer <jschwtzr@gte.net> 

cc: 

Subject: Re: information, pleaseJH 

Three years afte r publicatio n of the fina l rule , assuming this is th e 

compliance date . 

If by the compliance date their emissions prior to any add-on controls are less than 100 tpy, and 

they have incorporated the required controls based on their emissions level at the time they certify 

compliance, then they are in compliance regardless of what their emissions were prior to that date. 

Keith W. Barnett 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Emission Standards Division 

MD-13 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

919-541-5605 

barnett.keith@epa.gov 

John Schweitzer <jschwtzr@gte.net> 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

John Schweitzer 

< jschwtzr@gte.net > 

08/06/2001 09:44 AM 

Please respond to John 

Schweitzer 

To: Keith Bamett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

cc: 

Subject: Re: information, please 

Keith, thank you sending the information. 

By the way, if a sourcfesis above the lOOtpy threshold, bu€ wants to avoid 

the 95% capture and control requirement by reducing emjrssions below lOOtpy 

(for example, by cutting prspluction) , when would th-^y have to do this? 

By date of proposal (i.e., it'-^\too late)? 

By date of publication of the fin'&l rule? 

Three years after publication of tnKfinal ^rule? 

In other words, for an existing source^ 

above-the-floor requirements? 

Thanks. 

•That is the date for triggering the 

Original Message 

From: <Barnett. Keith@epamz(il. epa. gov> 

To: "John Schweitzer" </jfschwtzr@gte.net> 

Sent: Friday, August/03, 2001 3:49 PM 

Subject: Re: information, please 

> I will fajr you a copy of a paper on using PTE's in the shipbuilding and 

> aerospace industries for your information. The concentration reference 

> came Irom the Table 5-1 of 

> | —yL +_. + +. 

> \/ I I I \l
# L_2015321EN.01007001.xml

| 5.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 321/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 321/70

---

DECISION No 2/2014 OF THE EU-GEORGIA ASSOCIATION COUNCIL

of 17 November 2014

on the establishment of two Sub-Committees [2015/2262]

THE EU-GEORGIA ASSOCIATION COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part (1) (‘the Agreement’), and in particular Article 409 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 431 of the Agreement, parts of the Agreement have been applied provisionally as of 1 September 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 431 of the Agreement, parts of the Agreement have been applied provisionally as of 1 September 2014.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 409(2) of the Agreement, the Association Council may decide to set up any special committee or body in specific areas necessary for the implementation of the Agreement to assist the Association Council in carrying out its duties. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 409(2) of the Agreement, the Association Council may decide to set up any special committee or body in specific areas necessary for the implementation of the Agreement to assist the Association Council in carrying out its duties.

| (3) | In order to allow for expert level discussions on the key areas falling within the scope of the provisional application of the Agreement, two sub-committees should be established. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In order to allow for expert level discussions on the key areas falling within the scope of the provisional application of the Agreement, two sub-committees should be established.

| (4) | Upon agreement of the Parties, it should be possible to modify the list of sub-committees and the scope of the individual sub-committees, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Upon agreement of the Parties, it should be possible to modify the list of sub-committees and the scope of the individual sub-committees,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Sub-Committees listed in the Annex are hereby established.

Article 2

The Rules of Procedure of the Sub-Committees listed in the Annex are governed by Article 16 of the Rules of Procedure of the Association Committee and of Sub-Committees as adopted by Decision No 1/2014 of the EU-Georgia Association Council.

Article 3

Upon agreement of the Parties the list of Sub-Committees set out in the Annex and the scope of the individual Sub-Committees listed in the Annex can be modified.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2014.

For the Association Council

The Chair

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 261, 30.8.2014, p. 4.

1

---

ANNEX

LIST OF SUB-COMMITTEES

| (1) | Sub-Committee on Freedom, Security and Justice |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Sub-Committee on Freedom, Security and Justice

| (2) | Sub-Committee on Economic and Other Sector Cooperation |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Sub-Committee on Economic and Other Sector Cooperation

---
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Local Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigneds best knowledge and belief:

(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of March 2004.

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | LOCAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| | (Company)                
|
| | /s/ Edward A. Townsend     
| |                            
| | Edward A. Townsend         
| | Chief Executive Officer    
| |                            
| | /s/ Richard L. Park        
| |                            
| | Richard L. Park            
| | Chief Financial Officer    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 532.253 Special rates or rate ranges for leader, supervisory, and production facilitating positions. ( a ) When special rates or rate ranges are established for nonsupervisory positions, a lead agency also shall establish special rates for leader, supervisory, and production facilitating positions, classified to the same occupational series and title, that lead, supervise, or perform production facilitating work directly relating to the nonsupervisory jobs covered by the special rates.
( b ) The step rate structure shall be the same as that of the related nonsupervisory special rate or rate range.
( c ) The following formulas shall be used to establish a special rate or rate range: ( 1 ) A single rate shall equal the top step of the appropriate leader, supervisory, or production facilitating grade on the regular schedule, plus the cents per hour difference between the top step of the appropriate nonsupervisory grade on the regular schedule and the special nonsupervisory rate.
( 2 ) For a multiple rate range, the step 2 rate shall equal the step 2 rate of the appropriate leader, supervisory, or production facilitating grade on the regular schedule, plus the cents per hour difference between the prevailing rate of the appropriate nonsupervisory grade on the regular schedule and the prevailing rate of the special rate position. Other required step rates shall be computed in accordance with the formula established in § 532.203 of this subpart.
[55 FR 46144, Nov. 1, 1990]
## Subtitle IV—Criminal Records and Information
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Richard M. Grandy, Manager and Chief Executive Officer of Easy GardenerProducts, Ltd., certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended December 31, 2003 of Easy Gardener Products, Ltd.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and;
          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and;
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: February 17, 2004    /s/ Richard M. GrandyRichard M. Grandy  Manager / CEO
### **CHAPTERS 603 THROUGH 699—RESERVED**

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–237, §3(b)(5), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2836, added placeholder for chapters 603 to 699.