alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018297EN.01004701.xml

| 22.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/47

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 36/2017

of 3 February 2017

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2018/1770]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/912 of 9 June 2016 correcting Regulation (EU) No 1303/2014 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to ‘safety in railway tunnels’ of the rail system of the European Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/912 of 9 June 2016 correcting Regulation (EU) No 1303/2014 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to ‘safety in railway tunnels’ of the rail system of the European Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 37dba (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1303/2014) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32016 R 0912: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/912 of 9 June 2016 (OJ L 153, 10.6.2016, p. 28).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32016 R 0912: Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/912 of 9 June 2016 (OJ L 153, 10.6.2016, p. 28).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) 2016/912 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 4 February 2017, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2017.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Claude MAERTEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 153, 10.6.2016, p. 28.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. ss 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Eduardo Avila, Chief Financial Officer of Tortuga Mexican
Imports, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Tortuga
Mexican Imports, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to date a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Date: January 16, 2009

/S/ Eduardo AvilaSignature: Eduardo
AvilaTitle: Chief Financial Officer

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 25

### CFR Correction

 In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, revised as of January 1, 2018, on page 218, in § 25.143, paragraph (c)(1) is reinstated to read as follows:

 § 25.143

* * * * *

(c) * * *

                            (1) At the minimum V2                             for takeoff;                        

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018-27860 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
#### § 630.305 Designating agency official to approve exigencies.

Before annual leave may be restored under 5 U.S.C. 6304, the determination that an exigency is of major importance and that therefore annual leave may not be used by employees to avoid forfeiture must be made by the head of the agency or someone designated to act for him or her on this matter. Except where made by the head of the agency, the determination may not be made by any official whose leave would be affected by the decision.

[53 FR 42933, Oct. 25, 1988]
EXHIBIT 32

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Resources, Inc. (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ruairidh Campbell, chief executive officer and chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant

| | at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2006

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-7138 DAVID EUGENE CRAWFORD, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-93-11, CA-97-3-4-V) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated in part, dismissed in part, and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL David Eugene Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: David E. Crawford appeals from the district court's orders denying his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and his motion for reconsideration. We deny Crawford's motion for a certificate of appealability as to all claims other than Crawford's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file an appeal, and dismiss those claims on the reasoning of the district court that the evidence does not support Crawford's claims for relief. United States v. Crawford , Nos. CR-93-11; CA-97-3-4-V (W.D.N.C. July 2, 1997). A defense attorney's failure to comply with his client's request to file an appeal constitutes per se ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Peak , 992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir. 1993). Furthermore,a district court may not credit an attorney's affidavit over a petitioner's verified papers without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Williams v. Griffin , 952 F.2d 820, 823 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we grant Crawford's motion for a certificate of appealability as to the limited claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's alleged failure to file an appeal after being asked to do so, vacate in part as to that claim, and remand that claim to the district court for an evidentiary hearing. We deny Crawford's motion to amend his informal brief.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. VACATED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART, AND REMANDED
2
§ 370.103 Eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible for a detail under this part, an individual must: ( 1 ) Work in the field of information technology management;
( 2 ) Be considered an exceptional employee by the individual's current employer; and
( 3 ) Be expected by the individual's current employer to assume increased information technology management responsibilities in the future.
( b ) To be eligible for a detail under this part, a Federal employee, in addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, must be serving in a position at the GS-11 level or above (or equivalent), under a career or career-conditional appointment or an appointment of equivalent tenure in the excepted service. For purposes of this part, positions of equivalent tenure in the excepted service are limited to permanent appointments. In addition, only career members of the Senior Executive Service are eligible to be detailed under this part.
( c ) To be eligible to participate in the Information Technology Exchange Program, a private sector organization must be registered in the Central Contractor Registration Database located at *http://www.ccr.gov ,* except as permitted by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR 4.1102).
( d ) To be eligible for a detail to a Federal agency under this part, a private sector employee, in addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, must meet citizenship requirements for Federal employment in accordance with 5 CFR 7.3 and 338.101, as well as any other statutory limitation.
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Paul Branagan,certify that:

-  I have	reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc.;Based on my	knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material	fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,	in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not	misleading with respect to the period covered by this report	Based on my	knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information	included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the	financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small	business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The small	business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for	establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined	in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer	and have:-  Designed		such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure		controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure		that material information relating to the small business issuer,		including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others		within those entities, particularly during the period in which this		report is being prepared;Evaluated		the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and		procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the		end		of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andDisclosed		in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal		control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business		issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth		fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially		affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small		business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.-  The small	business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on	our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to	the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small	business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent	functions):-  All		significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or		operation of internal control over financial reporting which are		reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's		ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;		andAny fraud,		whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who		have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control		over financial reporting.
 

 

Date: April 27, 2005

 

 

/s/ Paul Branagan                              

Paul Branagan,President and

Chief ExecutiveOfficer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Miguel Sandoval, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
The State of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00227

- CR

Arturo Rosales AKA Artemio Rosales

- AYALA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR1786

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is granted. We order the clerk of

this court to send appellant, pro se, a copy of the record. We further order appellant’s pro se

brief is due November 16, 2015

. Appellant is advised that no extensions of time to file the pro

se brief will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 511.203 Exercise of authority.

An agency may exercise the authority under § 511.202 only in accordance with guidelines and standards issued by OPM.
# L_2016341EN.01006501.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/65

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 166/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Annex XVI (Procurement) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2201]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Directive 2014/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Directive 2014/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 6d (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 842/2011) of Annex XVI to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘6e. | 32014 L 0055: Directive 2014/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on electronic invoicing in public procurement (OJ L 133, 6.5.2014, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6e.

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/55/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 133, 6.5.2014, p. 1.

1

(*1)  Constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
k . i

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Dec 13, 2006 16:10

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

LTR-06-0629

I:'nn

LOGGING DATE: 12/12/2006

GOV Bob Taft- 6 DEDMRS

DEDR

OH-GOV DEDIA

AO

Dale Klein P. [

Concerns the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive

materials ...

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION:

Appropriate

RF

12/01/2006

No

ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:

:~ 6 . 3E9 -0/
BoB TAFT

GOVERNOR

STATE OF OHIO

December 1, 2006

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 65 1(e) of the

Energy Policy Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator

produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections 11 e. (3) and

1 le.(4) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

In 1999, the state of Ohio entered into an Agreement with the Commission under Section

274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that Agreement, Ohio licenses

byproduct material as defined in Section 11 e.(1) of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, Ohio

licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now defined as

byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from

the program for licensing 1 Ile. (1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made to the

licensing program that would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy. Further, we

intend to continue to license the new byproduct material under this same program. Accordingly,

I certify to the Commission that the state of Ohio has a program for licensing byproduct material,

as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section I le. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended,

that is adequate to protect the public health and safety, and that the state of Ohio intends to

continue to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC' s "Plan for the

Transition of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct

Material."

Sincerely,

3~74kV

Bob Taft

Governor

BT:mt

cc: J. Nick Baird, M.D., Director of Health

77 SOUTH HIGH STREET * 30TH FLOOR * COLUMBUS, OHIO 43215-61 17 * 614.466.3555 *FAX: 614.466.9354
#### § 351.607 Permissive continuing exceptions.

An agency may make exception to the order of release in § 351.601 and to the action provisions of § 351.603 when needed to retain an employee on duties that cannot be taken over within 90 days and without undue interruption to the activity by an employee with higher retention standing. The agency shall notify in writing each higher-standing employee reached for release from the same competitive level of the reasons for the exception.