T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T P E T R OS HA KO B YA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73252 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 864- 522 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P e tr os H a koby an, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of A rm e ni a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU L 09 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73252 2 u n d er 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew fo r su b st an t i al ev i d en ce factual fi n d i n g s, in c lu d in g th e a g e n c y ’s a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityf in d in g s . C ortez -P i neda v. H older , 610 F .3 d1 1 1 8 , 1 1 2 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . H ak o b ya n testifiedre g ar d in g a h it -a n d -ru n in cid en t i n w h ich H ak o b ya n ’s daught e rw a s s truc k byac arw hi l e c r os s i ng the s tr e e t , a nd t o the a l l e ge d poi s oni ng of hi s w i f e a nd daught e r s , buthi s or i gi na l de c l ar a t i on s ubm i tt e d w i th hi s a s y l um ap p lic a tio n d o e s n o t m e n tio n th e s e in c id e n ts . See Zam an ov v. H older , 649 F . 3d 969, 973- 74 ( 9th C i r . 2011) (a d d it io n al in cid en ts re co u n tedinp etit io n er ’s s ubs e que ntw r i tt e n s t a t e m e nt s a nd t e s t i m onym a t e r i a l l ya l t e r e d the a c c ountof p er se cu ti o n su ff

icien tl y to su p p o rt an ad v er se cr ed ib il ity f in d in g ). H ak o b ya n ’s e x p lan a tio n s o f

th e in c o n s is te n c ie s a n do m is s io n d o n o t c o m p e l ac o n tr aryr e s u lt. Se e id. a t974 ( e xpl ana t i on di d notc om pe l be l i e f “ i n l i ghtof

the i m port anc e of

the o m itte din c id e n ts to h is a s y lu m c la im ” ) . A c c o r d in g ly , in th e ab s e n c e o f c r e d ib le t e s t i m ony , w e de nythe pe t i t i on a s t o H a koby an’ s a s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of rem o v al cl ai m s. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se H a koby a n’ s C A T c l a i m r e l i e s on the s a m e s t a t e m e nt s the a ge nc yf ound not c r e d ib le , an dh e d o e s n o t p o in t to a n yo th e re v id e n c e in th e r e c o r dth a t w o u ld c om pe l af

i ndi ng tha ti ti s m or e l i ke l ythan nothe w oul d be t ortur e d byorw i th the08- 73252 3 a c q u ie s c e n c e o f

th e g o v e rn m e n t if

r e tu rn e dto A rm e n ia . Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 3 4 8 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 6 - 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , H a k o b y an ’s C A T c la im fai l s. H a koby an’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons a r e nots upport e d bythe r e c or d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.