alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Claudia L. Acord, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.

                                          /s/ CLAUDIA L. ACORD
                                          -------------------------
                                          Claudia L. Acord
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                          November 12, 2004
Board Coverage Decision

2010-42.2

Bourbon Stockyard Company

Employer Coverage Terminated*

No Decision Published

BA # 4541
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Clay A. Blake, Petitioner,

v. State of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2010-155846

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal From Georgetown County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-025 Submitted May 2, 2012 – Filed June 27, 2012

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, the writ of certiorari is DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

. TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY , KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. 103rd Street & West End Avenue, Inc., Appellant, against Joseph Lilly et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

We deem that Special Term failed to give sufficient consideration to the persuasive nature of the evidence concerning the income-producing capacity of the property involved herein during the years in question. Taking all the evidence into consideration, we find that the assessments should be modified by further reducing them as follows:

> *Land Building Total*

> 1941- 42 $174,000 $650,000 $824,000

> 1942- 43 168,000 625,000 793,000

The order, so far as appealed from, should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the relator.

Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the relator-appellant. Settle order on notice.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-058 April 25, 2006

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS MAY 10-11 IN GEORGIA

TO DISCUSS REVIEW OF POSSIBLE EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public in Waynesboro, Ga., on

Wednesday, May 10, and Thursday, May 11, to discuss how the agency would review an expected

application for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at the Vogtle site, about 23 miles southeast of Augusta, Ga. 

The site, owned by Southern Nuclear Operating Co., currently contains two commercial nuclear power

plants.

 On May 10, the staff will hold an open house from noon until 2 p.m. in the Auditorium of the

Burke County Library, 130 Highway 24 South in Waynesboro. There will be no formal presentations,

but the staff will have information available about the ESP process and will informally discuss the

process with interested members of the public.

On May 11, the meeting will be held in the Auditorium of the Augusta Technical College’s

Waynesboro campus, 216 Highway 24 South, from 7 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Before the meeting NRC staff

will be available for informal discussions during an open house from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. The NRC will

then make a formal presentation at the meeting which will include information on the NRC’s overall

licensing process for nuclear power plants, as well as an overview of how the ESP process works and

how the public can participate. Members of the public are invited to ask questions regarding the

agency’s ESP review.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The NRC’s

review process requires both a technical review of safety issues and an environmental review for each

application. If approved, an ESP gives the applicant up to 20 years to decide whether to build one or

more nuclear plants on the site and to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin

construction.

If Southern submits an ESP application as expected, the NRC staff will review it to determine

whether Southern has provided enough information for the agency to begin a formal review. If the

application has sufficient information, the NRC will formally docket, or file, the application and will

announce an opportunity to request a hearing.

###
#### Charter Oak Insurance Company *vs.*Star Insurance Company.

This court will not entertain a case reserved by the superior court on a motion for a nonsuit, for advice as to whether the nonsuit should be granted.

Assumpsit, tried in the superior court for Hartford County. The defendants moved for a nonsuit. The record recited the plaintiffs’ evidence, and concluded as follows: — “ If upon said evidence, or so much. thereof as may be legally admissible, the plaintiffs have failed to make out a *prima facie*case, this court will grant said motion for a nonsuit; and all questions respecting the admissibility of said testimony and the question whether said evidence is sufficient to make out a *prima facie*case for the plaintiffs, and what judgment should be rendered thereon, are reserved for the advice of the Supreme Court of Errors.” The parties were desirous to proceed with the hearing in this court upon the case as presented by the record, but the court were unanimously of opinion that the question of granting a nonsuit must in all cases be decided in the first instance by the court below, and that no judgment having been rendered in this case, and this court having no power to advise one, the questions of evidence could not be considered, as it did not appear that a decision of these would necessarily affect the decision of the cause.
### §130506. Exclusive right to name and emblems

The corporation has the exclusive right to use and to allow others to use the names "Little League" and "Little Leaguer" and the official Little League emblem or any colorable simulation of that emblem. This section does not affect any vested rights.

(Pub. L. 105–225, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1378.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 130506 | 36:1086. | July 16, 1964, Pub. L. 88–378, §16, 78 Stat. 328. |

Section

The word "sole" is omitted as included in "exclusive". The words "or refuse" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "This section does not affect any vested rights" are substituted for "No powers or privileges hereby granted shall, however, interfere or conflict with established or vested rights" for consistency in the revised title and to eliminate unnecessary words.
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Iowa Terminal Railroad Company

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of Iowa Terminal Railroad Company (IAT) (BA

No. 5620) as an employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45

U.S.C. §231 et sea.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance

Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et sea.) (RUIA).

In March 1986 IAT filed an application with the Interstate Commerce

Commission (ICC) to abandon its line, alleging, among other things,

that there had been no traffic on the part of the line known as the

Mason City Division for at least four years, and for the portion

known as the Charles City Division for more than 10 years. The ICC

granted IAT permission to abandon the line, but shortly thereafter

Iowa Traction Railroad Company (ITRC)1 offered to purchase the

10.4-mile Mason City Division portion of the line. Sale of this

portion of the line was consummated on April 13, 1987.

Based upon the information summarized above, it is determined that

Iowa Terminal Railroad Company ceased to be a rail carrier employer

under the RRA and RUIA effective April 13, 1987, the date of the

i^eroieh Kever

ITRC has been found to be an employer covered by the Acts.

B.A. No. 3655.
### §6614. Funds advanced by Secretary of Senate to Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of Senate to defray office expenses; accountability; maximum amount; vouchers

From funds available for any fiscal year (commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 1984), the Secretary of the Senate shall advance to the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate for the purpose of defraying office expenses such sums (for which the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper shall be accountable) not in excess of $1,000 at any one time, as such Sergeant at Arms shall from time to time request; except that the aggregate of the sums so advanced during the fiscal year shall not exceed $10,000.

In accordance with the provisions of this section, a detailed voucher shall be submitted to the Secretary of the Senate by such Sergeant at Arms whenever necessary, in order to replenish funds expended.

(Pub. L. 98–51, title I, §104, July 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 65d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section is from the Congressional Operations Appropriation Act, 1984, which is title I of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1984.
### §212. Disposition of rights in educational awards

No scholarship, fellowship, training grant, or other funding agreement made by a Federal agency primarily to an awardee for educational purposes will contain any provision giving the Federal agency any rights to inventions made by the awardee.

(Added Pub. L. 98–620, title V, §501(14), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3368.)
### §2291. Federal Project Repayment District

(a) The Secretary may enter into a contract providing for the payment or recovery of an appropriate share of the costs of a project under his responsibility with a Federal Project Repayment District or other political subdivision of a State prior to the construction, operation, improvement, or financing of such project. The Federal Project Repayment District shall include lands and improvements which receive identifiable benefits from the construction or operation of such project. Such districts shall be established in accordance with State law, shall have specific boundaries which may be changed from time to time based upon further evaluations of benefits, and shall have the power to recover benefits through any cost-recovery approach that is consistent with State law and satisfies the applicable cost-recovery requirement under subsection (b).

(b) Prior to execution of an agreement pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall require and approve a study from the State or political subdivision demonstrating that the revenues to be derived from a contract under this section, or an agreement with a Federal Project Repayment District, will be sufficient to equal or exceed the cost recovery requirements over the term of repayment required by Federal law.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §916, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4191; Pub. L. 100–676, §15, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4026.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–676 substituted "have the power to recover benefits through any cost-recovery approach that is consistent with State law and satisfies the applicable cost-recovery requirement under subsection (b)" for "include the power to collect a portion of the transfer price from any transaction involving the sale, transfer, or change in beneficial ownership of lands and improvements within the district boundaries".
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

Written Statement of ChiefExecutive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officerof American Bank Holdings, Inc. (The “Company”), hereby certifies that to hisknowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)                        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(b)                       Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Phillip C. Bowman                  |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Phillip C. Bowman                      |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | May 14, 2003                           |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to American Bank Holdings, Inc. andwill be retained by American Bank Holdings, Inc. And furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          92,887
<SECURITIES>                                   105,430
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                       776
<INVENTORY>                                     65,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               390,466
<PP&E>                                         125,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 480,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,405
<BONDS>                                        172,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   480,060
<SALES>                                         85,802
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,251
<CGS>                                           43,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,275
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
473 P.2d 911

#### CITY OF HOBBS, Respondent, v. Loarn Anthony BISWELL, Relator.

No. 9109.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Aug. 20, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 405, 81 N.M. 778, 473 P.2d 917, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
TICKET

DATE RECEIVED: 09/04/97

FROM:

ORIGINAL DUE DT:

DIVISION DATE:

TIME:

06/30/98

06/30/98

CONTROL NO: 9700385

DOC DT: 08/15/97

COMP DT: / /

Mario P. Fiori

Manager

Savanna River Site

DOE

TO:

Paperiello

FOR SIGNATURE OF : ** BLUE ** SECY NO:

Paperiello

ASSIGNED TO:

DESC:

CONTACT:

Weller

ROUTING:

MOU AND IA BETWEEN DOE, SAVANNAH RIVER OPERATIONS

OFFICE AND THE NRC ON THE CLOSURE OF HIGH-LEVEL

WASTE STORAGE TANKS AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE

Paperiello

Kane

Linehan

Dattilo

Poland

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS:

OLO'0 ailA

.&' s OEM .~~~~liz
Department of Energy

1* Savannah River Operations Office

id tw}P.O. Box A

Aiken, South Carolina 29802

AUG 1 5 7.

Dr. Carl J. Paperiello

Director

Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

Dear Dr. PaperinO:

SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and Interagency Agreement (IA) between''

the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Savannah River Operations Office (SR),

and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on the Closure of High T

Level Waste (HLW) Storage Tanks at the Savannah River Site (SRS) S;

We are looking forward to working with you and the NRC staff in accordance with the recently

finalized MOU and IA regarding specific criteria for classification of residual waste in HLW

storage tanks at SRS as "incidental" waste.

As a starting point, please find enclosed a copy of the Regulatory Basis for the Incidental Waste

Classification at the Savannah River Site High Level Waste Tank Farms, Revision 1, dated

April 30, 1997, for your staffs review.

~ousti6*'~iVy be' directed to Frank McCoy, Assistant Manager for High Level Waste, at

803-208-6053 or Larry Ling at 803-208-8248.

Sincerely,

.;.... ... ; g~(?4aio P. Fiori

Manager

PB-97-0114 V

Enclosure

Regulatory Basis fer the

Incidental Waste Classification

at the SRS HLW Tank Farms, Rev. 1
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-18-00253-CR 

________________________

DAMEON MARMOLEJO, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 137th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2018-414,849; Honorable John J. “Trey” McClendon III, Presiding 

 

October 3, 2018 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Pending before this court is the Motion to Dismiss Appeal of Appellant, Dameon 

Marmolejo, in which he moves to have his notice of appeal withdrawn and this appeal 

dismissed. Pursuant to an open plea of guilty, Appellant was convicted of aggravated 

assault by use of a deadly weapon1 and sentenced to fifteen years confinement. As 

 

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a) (2) (West 2011).
2

required by Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion to dismiss 

is signed by Appellant and his attorney. No decision of this court having been delivered, 

the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be 

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam

 

Do not publish.
### §41307. Reporting requirement for missing children

#### (a) In general

Each Federal, State, and local law enforcement agency shall report each case of a missing child under the age of 21 reported to such agency to the National Crime Information Center of the Department of Justice and, consistent with section 40507 (including rules promulgated pursuant to section 40507(c)) of this title, shall also report such case, either directly or through authorization described in such section to transmit, enter, or share information on such case, to the NamUs databases.

#### (b) Guidelines

The Attorney General may establish guidelines for the collection of such reports including procedures for carrying out the purposes of this section and section 41308 of this title.1

#### (c) Annual summary

The Attorney General shall publish an annual statistical summary of the reports received under this section and section 41308 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVII, §3701, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4966; Pub. L. 108–21, title II, §204, Apr. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 660; Pub. L. 117–327, §2(c)(1), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4455.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This section and section 41308 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title XXXVII of Pub. L. 101–647, which enacted this section and section 41308 of this title, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5779 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–327 inserted before period at end "and, consistent with section 40507 (including rules promulgated pursuant to section 40507(c)) of this title, shall also report such case, either directly or through authorization described in such section to transmit, enter, or share information on such case, to the NamUs databases".

2003—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–21 substituted "age of 21" for "age of 18".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–327 applicable with respect to reports made before, on, or after Dec. 27, 2022, see section 40506(c)(3) of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §72a–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–57, §105(i)(1), July 28, 1967, 81 Stat. 144

Section, Pub. L. 85–75, July 1, 1957, 71 Stat. 246, provided for computation of salaries and wages paid out of Senate contingent-expense items. See section 4575(b), (c) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 1, 1967, see section 105(k) of Pub. L. 90–57, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4575 of this title.