alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bruker Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank H. Laukien, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



Date: March 12, 2010

By:

/s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D. Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
# L_2017161EN.01004101.xml

| 22.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 259/2015

of 30 October 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/1048]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/864 of 4 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 on the fees and charges payable to the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/864 of 4 June 2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 on the fees and charges payable to the European Chemicals Agency pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zf (Commission Regulation (EC) No 340/2008) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 R 0864: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/864 of 4 June 2015 (OJ L 139, 5.6.2015, p. 1).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 R 0864: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/864 of 4 June 2015 (OJ L 139, 5.6.2015, p. 1).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/864 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda SLETNES

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 5.6.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 511.616 Availability of information. ( a ) The Office, upon a request which identifies the individual from whose file the information is sought, shall disclose the following information from an appeal file to a member of the public, except when the disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy: ( 1 ) Confirmation of the name of the individual from whose file the information is sought and the names of the other parties concerned;
( 2 ) The status of the appeal;
( 3 ) The results of the appeal (*i.e.,* proper title, pay plan, series, and grade);
( 4 ) the classification requested (*i.e.,* title, pay plan, series, and grade); and
( 5 ) With the consent of the parties concerned, other reasonably identified information from the file.
( b ) The Office will disclose to the parties concerned the information contained in an appeal file in proceedings under this part. For the purposes of this section, *the parties concerned* means the Government employee or former Government employee involved in the proceedings, his or her representative designated in writing, and the representative of the agency or the Office involved in the proceeding.
(5 U.S.C. 552, Freedom of Information Act, Pub. L. 92-502)
[50 FR 3313, Jan. 24, 1985]
§ 630.209 Refund for unearned leave. ( a ) When an employee who is indebted for unearned leave is separated, the agency shall: ( 1 ) Require him to refund the amount paid him for the period covering the leave for which he is indebted; or
( 2 ) Deduct that amount from any pay due him. An employee who enters active military service with a right of restoration is deemed not separated for the purpose of this paragraph.
( b ) This section does not apply when an employee: ( 1 ) Dies;
( 2 ) Retires for disability; or
( 3 ) Resigns or is separated because of disability which prevents him from returning to duty or continuing in the service, and which is the basis of the separation as determined by his agency on medical evidence acceptable to it.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52026-52027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice: 2012-0448]

 Application for Final Commitment for a Long-term Loan or 
Financial Guarantee in Excess of $100 Million

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of 25 day comment period regarding an application for 
final commitment for a long-term loan or financial guarantee in excess 
of $100 million.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reason for Notice: This Notice is to inform the public, in 
accordance with Section 3(c)(10) of the Charter of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank''), that Ex-Im Bank has 
received an application for final commitment for a long-term loan or 
financial guarantee in excess of $100 million (as calculated in 
accordance with Section 3(c)(10) of the Charter). Comments received 
within the comment period specified below will be presented to the Ex-
Im Bank Board of Directors prior to final action on this Transaction.
    Reference: AP086953XX.

Purpose and Use

    Brief description of the purpose of the transaction:
    To support the export of commercial aircraft to Ireland.
    Brief non-proprietary description of the anticipated use of the 
items being exported:
    To be sub-leased to foreign airlines (acceptable to Ex-Im Bank), to 
be determined at a later date, for short- and medium-haul passenger air 
service in East Asia, South Asia, and/or Europe.
    To the extent that Ex-Im Bank is reasonably aware, the item(s) 
being exported are not expected to produce exports or provide services 
in competition with the exportation of goods or provision of services 
by a United States industry.

Parties

    Principal Supplier: The Boeing Company.
    Obligor: AWAS Aviation Trading Limited.
    Guarantor(s): N/A.

Description of Items Being Exported

    Boeing 737 aircraft.
    Information on Decision: Information on the final decision for this 
transaction will be available in the ``Summary Minutes of Meetings of 
Board of Directors'' on http://www.exim.gov/articles.cfm/board%20minute.

[[Page 52027]]

    Confidential Information: Please note that this notice does not 
include confidential or proprietary business information; information 
which, if disclosed, would violate the Trade Secrets Act; or 
information which would jeopardize jobs in the United States by 
supplying information that competitors could use to compete with 
companies in the United States.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 24, 2012 to be 
assured of consideration before final consideration of the transaction 
by the Board of Directors of Ex-Im Bank.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.regulations.gov.

Kathryn Hoff-Patrinos,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-21160 Filed 8-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 63915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24663]



[[Page 63913]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of November 1, 2004--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to Sudan


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 211 / Tuesday, November 2, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 63915]]

                Notice of November 1, 2004

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Sudan

                On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order 13067, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                Sudan pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
                Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States 
                constituted by the actions and policies of the 
                Government of Sudan. Because the actions and policies 
                of the Government of Sudan continue to pose an unusual 
                and extraordinary threat to the national security and 
                foreign policy of the United States, the national 
                emergency declared on November 3, 1997, and the 
                measures adopted on that date to deal with that 
                emergency must continue in effect beyond November 3, 
                2004. Therefore, consistent with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing for 1 year the national emergency with 
                respect to Sudan.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    November 1, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-24663
Filed 11-1-04; 1:43 pm]
Billing code 3195-01-P
2000 Coal Controls for SO

2 an

Sourc(NEEDMaps (Virtuelectrother partic
2005 Coal Controls for SO

2 an

Virtuelectrother particSourc(NEEDMaps (
2008 Coal Controls for SO

2 an

Virtuelectrother particSourc(NEEDMaps (
2010 Coal Controls for SO

2 an

Virtuelectrother particSourc(NEEDMaps (
2012 Coal Controls for SO

2 an

Virtuelectrother particSourc(NEEDMaps (
2014 Coal Controls for SO

2 an

Virtuelectrother particSourc(NEEDMaps (
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



|In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clixster Mobile Group Inc a Texas corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months period ending March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Noor Azlan Khamis, I, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Clixster Mobile Group Inc, and will be retained by Clixster Mobile Group Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Noor Azlan Khamis     
|--------------------------
|--------------------------
|Noor Azlan Khamis         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|June 23, 2014
Merrimack,

Dec., 1898.

#### Brown *v.*Peaslee.

The findings of a referee that lands in controversy were included in duly recorded deeds, under which the defendant occupied for more than twenty years prior to an action for trespass against him, and that he had been, in open, visible, notorious, exclusive, and adverse possession of the premises for more than twenty years prior to such action, establish a title by deed and by prescription.

Trespass, *quare clausum.*The acts which the -plaintiff claims constitute the trespass to his land were the construction and occupation by the defendant of a building thereon, called the carriage house, and the dumping of dirt and sand around it. Pacts-found by a referee. Both parties move for judgment.

*Albin, Martin $• Howe,*for the plaintiff.

*437
      *Sargent f Niles*and *Fred H. Gould,*for the defendant.

Blodgett, C. J.

The real controversy between the parties is as to the site of the divisional line between their lands. Both claim under deeds which necessitate the location on the ground of the boundaries described; and, in addition, the defendant claims by adverse possession.

The referee to whom the cause was sent finds as a matter of fact that the defendant’s deeds (given and recorded more than twenty years prior to the commencement of this suit) include the land in question; “ that the defendant has been in the open, visible, notorious, exclusive, and adverse possession of the land described in his said deeds for more than twenty years before the date of the writ, under color of title thereto, and that the defendant has had open, visible, notorious, exclusive, and adverse possession of the land upon which the carriage house stands for more than twenty years before the date of the writ, claiming under color of title.”

Either of these findings is conclusive. “ The location on the ground of the boundaries described in a deed is a question of fact ” *(Tasker*v. *Cilley,*59 N. H. 575), and *“*possession under a deed, duly recorded, is constructive notice that he who is in possession is claiming adversely, it being the presumption that he is claiming under and according to his title.” *Forest*v. *Jackson,*56 N. H. 357, 362; *Clark*v. *Clough,*65 N. H. 43, 78. By deed and by prescription, the defendant’s title is alike incontestably established.

The exceptions to evidence taken at the trial require no consideration.

*Judgment on the report for the*defendant.

All concurred.
STATUS OF NEW

REACTOR ISSUES

April 17, 2007

William Kane, Deputy Executive

Director for Reactor and

Preparedness Programs
Agenda

• Overview of New Reactor Status

* Environmental Reviews

2
Activities Update

• Completed

-Two early site permits issued

- Updated Standard Review Plan

and Regulatory Guides

-Staffing and Training

- Technical Assistance

Contracting framework

3
Activities Update

* On-going

- Process for Early Resolution of

Design Acceptance Criteria

- ESBWR design certification

review

- Pre-Combined license

interactions

-Licensing Program Plan

4
Near Term Activities

* North Anna Early Site Permit

* Rulemaking

- Part 52 (new reactor

requirements)

- Part 26 (fitness for duty)

- Limited work authorization

-Part 73 (security requirements)

5
Workload Forecast Changes

" TXU Power

US Advanced Pressurized Water

Reactor

* Amarillo Power

-Evolutionary Power Reactor

-No early site permit

" Regulatory Issue Summary

6
Workload Forecast Changes

* FP&L

-Turkey Point - Potential Site

* Ameren UE - Callaway Plant

- Evolutionary Power Reactor

7
Environmental Reviews

* Environmental review process

* Lessons learned from early site

permit reviews

* Preparation for combined license

reviews

* Pre-application interactions

* Challenges

8
Environmental Review

Process

" Scoping

* Draft Environmental Impact

Statement

* Resolution of comments

* Final Environmental Impact

Statement

" Hearing

9
Lessons Learned from ESPs

Applicant related issues

o Quality of submittal

*Timeliness of responses to

requests for additional

information

*Timeliness of interactions

with State agencies

10
Lessons Learned from ESPs

NRC staff related issues

Training for staff and contractors

Air Quality Nuclear Safety/ Air QFuel Cycle/

Waste/

. -Accident Analysis

Socioeconomicsl

Environmental Justice Terrestrial

Ecology

Radiation

Protection

,u ý- a .Transportation/

Land Use -

A

E

quatic

cology

Archaeology/ Edo

'Cultural Res~ourcbs

4

Hydiologic Sciences"

(Surface and Groundwater)

0 - Water Ume

Economics

(BenefitS PAssessment) 0 0 0

Power Marketing

(Alferndtive Energy.

11
Lessons Learned from ESPs

NRC staff related issues

* Leveraging technical assistance

contractors

• Use of site audits

• Improved comment capture/

resolution

* Clearly articulated logic for

positions

* Identification of variances from

guidance

12
Preparation for Combined

License reviews

* Contracts in place

" Interagency Agreements

" Updating Environmental Standard

Review Plan (NUREG-1555)

" Knowledge Management

13
Status of Pre-Application

Interactions

* Purpose

* Planned Activities

Bellefonte

Summer

Lee Station

Shearon Harris

South Texas

14
Challenges

" Staffing and training

" Guidance development related to

Part 52 revisions

" Continuity of funding

15
Acronyms

* ESP- Early site permit

* ESBWR - Economic simplified

boiling water reactor

16
### Part A—Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office
March 21, 2007

Mr. Steven A. Toelle

USEC Inc. 

6903 Rockledge Drive

Bethesda, MD 20817-1818

SUBJECT: DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS, AND THE U.S. 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ON THE AMERICAN CENTRIFUGE

PLANT

Dear Mr. Toelle,

Attached is a draft of the subject document which delineates the roles and

responsibilities of the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

(NRC) for the deployment and utilization of gas centrifuge technology by USEC Inc. (USEC) in

its American Centrifuge Plant. The subject document was developed after numerous

discussions, phone calls, and meetings between NRC and DOE. The DOE and NRC intend to

finalize this document by April 13, 2007. As such, any comments or concerns that you may

have should be provided to the NRC by March 30, 2007. If you have any questions or need

clarification on the subject matter, please contact Brian W. Smith at 301-415-7457, or

BWS1@nrc.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/RA by Rex Wescott for/

Brian W. Smith, Branch Chief

Enrichment and Conversion Branch

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety 

 and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Material Safety 

 and Safeguards 

Docket No.: 70-07004

Enclosure: 

Memorandum of Understanding

Between the Department of Energy,

Oak Ridge Operations, and the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

cc: Randall DeVault, DOE Oak Ridge 

 William Seymunski, DOE HQ 
Mr. Steven A. Toelle

USEC Inc. 

6903 Rockledge Drive

Bethesda, MD 20817-1818

SUBJECT: DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF

ENERGY, OAK RIDGE OPERATIONS, AND THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION ON THE AMERICAN CENTRIFUGE PLANT

Dear Mr. Toelle,

Attached is a draft of the subject document which delineates the roles and responsibilities of the

Department of Energy (DOE) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the deployment and

utilization of gas centrifuge technology by USEC Inc. (USEC) in its American Centrifuge Plant. The

subject document was developed after numerous discussions, phone calls, and meetings between NRC

and DOE. The DOE and NRC intend to finalize this document by April 13, 2007. As such, any comments

or concerns that you may have should be provided to the NRC by March 30, 2007. If you have any

questions or need clarification on the subject matter, please contact Brian W. Smith at 301-415-7457, or

BWS1@nrc.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/RA by Rex Wescott for/

Brian W. Smith, Branch Chief

Enrichment and Conversion Branch

Division of Fuel Cycle Safety 

 and Safeguards

Office of Nuclear Material Safety 

 and Safeguards 

Docket No.: 70-07004

Enclosure: 

Memorandum of Understanding

Between the Department of Energy,

Oak Ridge Operations, and the

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

cc: Randall DeVault, DOE Oak Ridge 

 William Seymunski, DOE HQ 

Distribution:

FCSS r/f

ML070780669

OFFICE FCSS FCSS OGC FCSS

NAME ISpivack LWilliamson JHull Bsmith

/by R. Wescott for/

DATE 03/20/07 03/20/07 03/21/07 03/21/07

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
### §6717. Judicial review

(a) Appeals in Federal Court of Appeals.—A unit of general local government which receives notice from the Secretary about withholding payments under section 6703(f), suspending payments under section 6713(a)(1)(B), or terminating payments under section 6712(d)(2)(A), may apply for review of the action of the Secretary by filing a petition for review with the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which the government is located. The petition shall be filed by the 60th day after the date the notice is received. The clerk of the court shall immediately send a copy of the petition to the Secretary.

(b) Filing of Record of Administrative Proceeding.—The Secretary shall file with the court a record of the proceeding on which the Secretary based the action. The court may consider only objections to the action of the Secretary that were presented before the Secretary.

(c) Court Action.—The court may affirm, change, or set aside any part of the action of the Secretary. The findings of fact by the Secretary are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence in the record. If a finding is not supported by substantial evidence in the record, the court may remand the case to the Secretary to take additional evidence. Upon such a remand, the Secretary may make new or modified findings and shall certify additional proceedings to the court.

(d) Review Only by Supreme Court.—A judgment of a court under this section may be reviewed only by the Supreme Court under section 1254 of title 28, United States Code.

(Added Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31001(a), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1878.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6717, Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1025; Pub. L. 98–185, §§7, 9(h), Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1310, 1312, related to discrimination proceedings, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–272, title XIV, §14001(a)(1), (e), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 327, 329, eff. Oct. 18, 1986.