alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Addendum to Non qualified Stock Option Agreement Dated March 1, 2002



Exhibit 10.66












Addendum to Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement Dated
March 1, 2002


Pursuant to Section 13 of the agreement between UAL Corporation
(the "Company") and Frederic F. Brace (the "Employee) dated March 1, 2002
regarding the grant of a nonqualified stock option under the 2000 Incentive
Stock Plan of UAL Corporation (the "Agreement"), effective as of the date
of grant, the number of shares granted under the Agreement is reduced from
One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand (125,000) shares to Forty-Nine Thousand
Six Hundred (49,600) shares.

 

	UAL CORPORATION
	 
	By /s/ Glenn F. Tilton
	Chairman, President and
	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	ACCEPTED:
	 
	/s/ Frederic F. Brace
	Frederic F. Brace
**EXHIBIT        32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In        connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of Allied Resources, Inc. for the quarterly        period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the        date hereof (“Report”), I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,        that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents,                        in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business                        issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of                        operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this                        Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/        Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh        Campbell

Chief        Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November        14, 2007

 

This        certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be        deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference        into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange        Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report),        irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed        original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small        business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

         

 

 

22
### MEPC 59/INF.17

I: \ M EP C \ 59 \ I N F - 1 7 . d oc 

### ANNEX TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF THE OceanSaverÆ BWMS

### MEPC 59/INF.17 ANNEX Page 2

I: \ M EP C \ 59 \ I N F - 1 7 . d oc

### MEPC 59/INF.17 ANNEX

Page 3

I: \ M EP C \ 59 \ I N F - 1 7 . d oc

### MEPC 59/INF.17 ANNEX Page 4

I: \ M EP C \ 59 \ I N F - 1 7 . d oc

### MEPC 59/INF.17 ANNEX

Page 5

I: \ M EP C \ 59 \ I N F - 1 7 . d oc 

### ___________
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________
No. 97-41531 Summary Calendar

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR ANTONIO GODINEZ-GARCES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(B-97-CR-298-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________ March 2, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Edgar Antonio Godinez-Garces appeals his guilty-plea

conviction for being in the United States without permission after

having previously been deported. He argues that his conviction

should be vacated because the transcript of his guilty plea does

not contain specific responses to several of the Fed. R. Crim. P.

11 questions posed by the district court and that this court cannot
conduct a meaningful review of his guilty plea. He contends that2

the error is not harmless because he is being denied his right to

an appeal.

There is no right to appeal from a gui lty plea in the

absence of a jurisdictional defect. Barrientos v. United States
, 668 F.2d 838, 842 (5th Cir. 1982). Appeal is limited to a review

of Rule 11 errors. Id. at 843.

Rule 11 requir es the district court to follow certain

procedures in determining whether a guilty plea is made knowingly

and voluntarily. U nited States v. Johnson
, 1 F.3d 286, 298-300

(5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). Rule 11 ensures that the district court

addresses three core concerns: “(1) whether the guilty plea was

coerc ed; (2) whether the defendant understands the nature of the

charges; and (3) whether the defendant understands the consequences
of his plea.” Johnson , 1 F.3d at 300.

Although the distri ct court asked many of the Rule 11

questions to the defendan ts as a group and the record does not

contain individual responses to several of the Rule 11 inquiries,

the transcript of Godinez-Gar ces’ guilty plea contains questions

specifically directed toward him regarding whether he was coerced,

whether he understood the nature of the charge against him, and

whether he understood the consequences of his plea. Godinez-Garces

answered appropriately. Moreover, his counsel was silent when the

court asked if anyone had objections to its procedure.

Furthermore, Godinez-Garces does not argue that the

district court varied from the required Rule 11 procedures or that

he did not understand any of the rights he was waiving. Godinez-3

Garces’ argument that he is being denied his right to an appeal is

without merit and is in fact frivolous.

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel., Wickford Corporation, Appellant, against William W. Mills et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents. [1060 Park Ave., Borough of Manhattan.]

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 581.303 Response to legal process or interrogatories. ( a ) Whenever the designated agent is validly served with legal process pursuant to State procedures in effect pursuant to subjection (a)(1) or (b) of section 666 of title 42, United States Code, within 30 calendar days, or within such longer period as may be prescribed by applicable State law, the agent shall comply with all applicable provisions of section 666, including as follows: ( 1 ) If an agent is served with notice concerning amounts owed by an obligor to more than one person, the agent shall comply with section 666(b)(7);
( 2 ) Allocation of moneys due and payable to an individual under section 666(b) shall be governed by section 666(b) and the regulations prescribed under such section by the Secretary of Health and Human Services;
( 3 ) Such moneys as remain after compliance with paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section shall be available to satisfy any other such legal process on a first-come, first-served basis, with any such legal process being satisfied out of such moneys as remain after the satisfaction of all such legal process which have been previously served.
( 4 ) The agent or the agent's counsel or other designee shall respond within 30 calendar days to interrogatories which accompany legal process if the information sought in the interrogatory is not available to the entity to which it was sent, and the proper entity is known, the recipient shall forward the interrogatory to the appropriate entity in sufficient time to allow for a timely response.
( b ) If State or local law authorizes the issuance of interrogatories prior to or after the issuance of legal process, the agent shall respond to the interrogatories within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt: *Provided,* That the document(s) required by § 581.202(c) have been presented.
[45 FR 85667, Dec. 30, 1980, as amended at 63 FR 14759, Mar. 26, 1998]
# L_2015202EN.01004901.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/49

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 195/2014

of 25 September 2014

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1263]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2013/480/EU of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC (1), as corrected by OJ L 102, 5.4.2014, p. 22, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2013/480/EU of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC (1), as corrected by OJ L 102, 5.4.2014, p. 22, is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Decision 2013/480/EU repeals Commission Decision 2008/915/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2013/480/EU repeals Commission Decision 2008/915/EC (2), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement and which is consequently to be repealed under the EEA Agreement.

| (3) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 13cab (Commission Decision 2008/915/EC) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement is replaced by the following:

‘
  32013 D 0480: Commission Decision 2013/480/EU of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC (OJ L 266, 8.10.2013, p. 1), as corrected by OJ L 102, 5.4.2014, p. 22.’

Article 2

The texts of Decision 2013/480/EU, in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 266, 8.10.2013, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 332, 10.12.2008, p. 20.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 2412.10 Initial decision on amendment or correction. ( a ) Within ten (10) working days after receiving your request for amendment or correction, the FLRA's Solicitor or IG, as appropriate, will acknowledge receipt of the request and, under normal circumstances, the Solicitor or IG will notify you, by mail or other appropriate means, of the decision regarding the request not later than thirty (30) working days after receiving of the request.
( b ) The notice of decision will include: ( 1 ) A statement of whether the Solicitor or IG has granted or denied your request, in whole or in part;
( 2 ) A quotation or description of any amendment or correction made to any records; and
( 3 ) When a request is denied in whole or in part, an explanation of the reason for that denial and of your right to appeal the decision to the Chairman of the Authority, pursuant to § 2412.12.
§ 2418.5 How will the FLRA add interest, penalty charges, and administrative costs to an FLRA debt? ( a ) *Assessment and notice.* The FLRA shall assess interest, penalties, and administrative costs on FLRA debts in accordance with the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 31 CFR 901.9. Interest shall be charged in accordance with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3717(a). Penalties shall accrue at the rate of 6% per year, or such other higher rate as authorized by law. The FLRA shall determine administrative costs, that is, the costs of processing and handling a delinquent debt. In the notice to the debtor described in § 2418.4, the FLRA must explain how interest, penalties, costs, and other charges are assessed, unless the requirements are included in a contract or repayment agreement.
( b ) *Waiver of interest, penalties, and administrative costs.* Unless otherwise required by law, the FLRA may not charge interest if the amount due on the debt is paid within 30 days after the date from which the interest accrues. See 31 U.S.C. 3717(d). The FLRA may waive interest, penalties, and administrative costs, or any portion thereof, when it would be against equity and good conscience or not in the FLRA's best interest to collect such charges, in accordance with FLRA guidelines for waiving claims against FLRA employees for erroneous overpayments. See appendix A of this part.
( c ) *Accrual during suspension of debt collection.* In most cases, interest, penalties, and administrative costs will begin and continue to accrue 30 days after notice is given to the employee and during any period when collection has been suspended for any reason (for example, when the debtor has requested a hearing). The FLRA may suspend accrual of any or all of these charges when accrual would be against equity and good conscience or not in the FLRA's best interest, in accordance with FLRA guidelines for waiving claims against FLRA employees for erroneous overpayments. See appendix A of this part.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-04-018-CR

WILLIAM JAMES BRYANT    						APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 20, 2005.
### SUBCHAPTER II—CIVIL COMMITMENT OF DANGEROUS SEX OFFENDERS
B.C.n. 01-79 OCT 1 0 2001

EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

General Railway Corporation d/b/a Iowa Northwestern Railroad

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning

the status of General Railway Corporation d/b/a Iowa Northwestern

Railroad (“General Railway”) as an employer under the Railroad

Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seep) and the Railroad Unemployment

Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.).

Information regarding General Railway was provided by John Larkin,

President of General Railway. According to Mr. Larkin, General Railway

began doing business June 1, 2001, under the name Iowa Northwestern

Railroad. It currently has three employees. In Surface Transportation

Board Finance Docket No. 34037, General Railway filed a notice of

exemption to operate approximately 37 miles of rail line formerly owned

by Union Pacific Railroad, Inc. The Union Pacific transferred the rail

line to the Dickensen-Osceola Railway Association1. General Railway

engages in freight operations, and interchanges with the Union Pacific.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(1)),

insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer as:

(i) any carrier by railroad subject to the jurisdiction of

the Surface Transportation Board under Part A ofsubtitle IV

of title 49, United States Code;

Sections 1(a) and 1(b) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45

U.S.C. §§ 351(a) and (b)) contain substantially the same definition, as

does section 3231 of the Railroad Retirement Tax Act (26 U.S.C. § 3231).

1 The status of Dickensen-Osceola Railway Association under the Acts is currently being reviewed by

the Audit and Compliance Section.

BA# 2656
-2-

General Railway Corporation d/b/a Iowa Northwestern Railroad

The evidence of record establishes that General Railway is a carrier

operating in interstate commerce. Accordingly, it is determined that

General Railway is an employer within the meaning of section l(a)(l)(i) 

of the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231(a)(l)(i)) and the

corresponding provision ofthe Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act as

ofJune 1, 2001, the date as of which it commenced operations.

V. M. Speakman, Jr.
#### § 575.502 Definitions.

In this subpart:

*Agency* means an “Executive agency,” as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105.

*Authorized agency official* means the head of an agency or an official who is authorized to act for the head of the agency in the matter concerned.

*Employee* means an employee of an agency who satisfies the definition of that term in 5 U.S.C. 2105.

*Involuntarily reassigned* refers to a reassignment initiated by an agency against an employee's will and without he employee's consent for reasons other than cause on charges of misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency.

*Involuntarily separated* refers to a separation initiated by an agency against an employee's will and without the employee's consent for reasons other than cause on charges of misconduct, delinquency, or inefficiency. In addition, when an employee is separated because he or she declines to accept reassignment to another geographic area outside one of the covered locations, the separation is involuntary if the employee's position description or other written agreement does not provide for such reassignment. However, an employee's separation is not involuntary if, after such a written mobility agreement is added, the employee accepts one reassignment outside his or her particular territory, possession, or commonwealth, but subsequently declines another reassignment. An employee's separation as a result of disability retirement, a disability that prevents an employee from continuing Federal service or is the basis for separation by the agency as determined by acceptable medical evidence, or the death of an employee is considered to be an involuntary separation.

*Rate of basic pay* means the rate of pay fixed by law or administrative action for the position held by an employee, including any special rate under 5 CFR part 530, subpart C; locality-based comparability payment under 5 CFR part 531, subpart F; or similar payment under other legal authority, but before deductions and exclusive of additional pay of any other kind. For example, a *rate of basic pay* may not include nonforeign area cost-of-living allowances under 5 U.S.C. 5941, night shift differentials under 5 U.S.C. 5343(f), or environmental differentials under 5 U.S.C. 5343(c)(4).

*Service agreement* means a written agreement between an agency and an employee under which the employee agrees to a specified period of employment with the agency in a particular territory, possession, or commonwealth in return for payment of an extended assignment incentive.

*Service period* means an agreed-upon period of employment an employee is obligated to complete under a service agreement.

*Territory, possession, or commonwealth* means a territory or a possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

[68 FR 53669, Sept. 12, 2003, as amended at 70 FR 25752, May 13, 2005; 72 FR 67841, Dec. 3, 2007]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCorrelation of flight effects on centerline velocity decay for cold-flow acoustically excited jetsAcoustic excitation can influence the large scale shear layer structure of jet flow, thereby causing the jet centerline velocity to decay more rapidly. this phenomena has numerous practical applications, such as the reduction of jet/flap impingement velocity in order to reduce flap structural loads for under-the-wing STOL aircraft concepts. Cold flow centerline velocity decay data obtained with acoustic excitation of the jet exhaust flow are correlated with and without flight effects. Initially, static data are correlated in terms of an acoustic parameter involving the threshold sound level needed to initiate acoustic excitation of the jet plume. It is shown that for a given flight speed, the same acoustic excitation parameter as that developed for the static condition is valid. Finally, an aerodynamic flight effects parameter is included to correlate the static and flight centerline velocity decay data with and without acoustic excitation.Document ID19840003815Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsVonglahn, U. H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1982Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:83502E-1842NASA-TM-83502Meeting InformationMeeting: Meeting of the Acoustical Soc. of Am.Location: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: November 7, 1983End Date: November 11, 1983Accession Number84N11883Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-32Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840003815.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024