alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 575.105 Applicability to employees. ( a ) A recruitment incentive may be paid under the conditions prescribed in this subpart to an employee who is newly appointed to a position listed in § 575.103 that is likely to be difficult to fill, as determined under § 575.106.
( b ) ( 1 ) An agency may target groups of similar positions (excluding positions covered by § 575.103(a)(2), (a)(3), or (a)(5) or those in similar categories approved by OPM under § 575.103(a)(7)) that have been difficult to fill in the past or that may be difficult to fill in the future and make the required determination to offer a recruitment incentive to newly-appointed employees on a group basis.
( 2 ) An agency must define a targeted category of positions using factors that relate to the conditions described in § 575.106(b). Factors that may be appropriate include the following: occupational series, grade level, distinctive job duties, unique competencies required for the positions, and geographic location.
( 3 ) An agency must review each decision to target a group of similar positions for the purpose of granting a recruitment incentive at least annually to determine whether the positions are still likely to be difficult to fill. An authorized agency official must certify this determination in writing. If an agency determines the positions are no longer likely to be difficult to fill, the agency may not offer a recruitment incentive to newly-appointed employees in that group on a group basis.
( c ) An agency may not commence a recruitment incentive service agreement during— ( 1 ) A period of employment established under any service agreement required for a relocation incentive under 5 CFR part 575, subpart B, or
( 2 ) A period of employment established under any service agreement required for a retention incentive or for which an employee receives retention incentive payments without a service agreement under 5 CFR part 575, subpart C.
[70 FR 25740, May 13, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 67838, Dec. 3, 2007; 78 FR 49363, Aug. 14, 2013]
§ 754.201 Coverage. ( a ) *Actions covered.* This subpart applies to actions taken under 5 U.S.C. 9204.
( b ) *Employees covered.* This subpart covers an employee of an agency as defined and “employee” has the meaning given the term in 5 CFR 920.101.
( c ) *Definitions.* In this subpart— *Civil penalty* means a monetary penalty imposed on an employee of a covered agency when it has been determined the employee has violated the Fair Chance Act.
*Day* means a calendar day.
*Director* means the Director of OPM or Director's designee.
*Suspension* means the placing of an employee of a covered agency in a temporary status without duties and pay when it has been determined the employee violated the Fair Chance Act.
# L_2014170EN.01000102.xml

| 11.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/1

---

Information relating to the provisional application of an Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway consequent to the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union

The procedures necessary for the provisional application of an Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway consequent to the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 11 April 2014, having been completed on 15 May 2014, the Protocol will be applied on a provisional basis as from 1 August 2014.

1

---

(1)  See page 5 of this Official Journal.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Henry C. Brown, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The order dismisses the writ of habeas corpus and remands relator to the custody of defendant.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1471 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1471

 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to allow public water systems to 
         avoid filtration requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2003

  Mr. Engel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to allow public water systems to 
         avoid filtration requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FILTRATION REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1412(b)(7)(C) of title XIV of the Safe Drinking Water Act 
(42 U.S.C. 300g-1) is amended by adding the following at the end of 
clause (iii): ``After such 12 month period, based on information, 
technology, or evidence not available prior to the expiration of such 
12-month period, any public water system supplied by surface water 
sources may apply to the State agency for a determination that, under 
the criteria established under clause (i), the system is not required 
to use filtration. After notice and opportunity for public comment, but 
not later than 120 days after receipt of such application, the State 
shall make such determination and publish notice thereof.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §702a–8. Additional roads; construction by United States

In addition to the construction by the United States of roads in connection with floodways as heretofore provided, the Federal Government may, in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, and within the limits of available funds, construct additional roads to afford access to those portions of the levee lines not otherwise accessible.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 548, §8, 49 Stat. 1510.)
^-mRJMENT OF 

SERVED JANUARY 19,2011 / ^^f cWwiOiVS 

•vi! m 20 p 1:21 

u s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

STUART S. MACPHERSON 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10WP0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS FAA-2010-0538 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on May 19, 2010. Respondent Stuart MacPherson (hereinafter 

"Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing on May 5, 2010. 

On January 12, 2011, Respondent withdrew its Request for Hearing, citing 

settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 
2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

C ^ ^^yxr'oJci^Z^ 0 ^ 

flichfrd G. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

it 

I 

11 

I 

m 

km 

tm 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Stuart S. MacPherson, Respondent 

P.O. Box 807 

Cardiff, CA 92007 

TEL; 760-632-6624 

Laura Ponto, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-9863 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### §10454. Grant eligibility regarding compelling victim testimony

In order for a prosecutor's office to be eligible to receive grant funds under this subchapter, the head of the office shall certify, to the State, Indian Tribal government, or territorial government receiving the grant funding, that the office will, during the 3-year period beginning on the date on which the grant is awarded, engage in planning, developing and implementing—

(1) training developed by experts in the field regarding victim-centered approaches in domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking cases;

(2) policies that support a victim-centered approach, informed by such training; and

(3) a protocol outlining alternative practices and procedures for material witness petitions and bench warrants, consistent with best practices, that shall be exhausted before employing material witness petitions and bench warrants to obtain victim-witness testimony in the investigation, prosecution, and trial of a crime related to domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking of the victim in order to prevent further victimization and trauma to the victim.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2017, as added Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title I, §101(a)(3), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 848.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as a note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
### §12141. Grant authorization

#### (a) Establishment

#### (1) In general

The Attorney General may award grants to not more than 15 chronic high intensive crime areas to develop comprehensive model crime prevention programs that—

(A) involve and utilize a broad spectrum of community resources, including nonprofit community organizations, law enforcement organizations, and appropriate State and Federal agencies, including the State educational agencies;

(B) attempt to relieve conditions that encourage crime; and

(C) provide meaningful and lasting alternatives to involvement in crime.

#### (2) Consultation with the Ounce of Prevention Council

The Attorney General may consult with the Ounce of Prevention Council in awarding grants under paragraph (1).

#### (b) Priority

In awarding grants under subsection (a), the Attorney General shall give priority to proposals that—

(1) are innovative in approach to the prevention of crime in a specific area;

(2) vary in approach to ensure that comparisons of different models may be made; and

(3) coordinate crime prevention programs funded under this program with other existing Federal programs to address the overall needs of communities that benefit from grants received under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §30301, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1844.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 103–322, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1836. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13771 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
# L_2016211EN.01005701.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/57

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 103/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex X (Services in general) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1286]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2014/89/EU of 14 February 2014 on a pilot project to implement the administrative cooperation obligations set out in Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by means of the Internal Market Information System (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2014/89/EU of 14 February 2014 on a pilot project to implement the administrative cooperation obligations set out in Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by means of the Internal Market Information System (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex X to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex X to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 3 (Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex X to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘3a. | 32014 D 0089: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/89/EU of 14 February 2014 on a pilot project to implement the administrative cooperation obligations set out in Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council by means of the Internal Market Information System (OJ L 45, 15.2.2014, p. 36).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘3a.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision 2014/89/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 102/2015 of 30 April 2015 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 45, 15.2.2014. p. 36.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  See page 55 of this Official Journal.

2

---
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Peter
Braun, as President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By:  /s/ Peter Braun
-----------------------------
Peter Braun
President and CFO
May 14, 2003
#### Esther Hochberger et al., Appellants, v. Macombs-Inwood Realty Corp., Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Peek, P. J., Glennon-, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Concert Technologies 

Under Contract No. M00681-13-F-0147 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59396 

Jason R. Collins, Esq. 

Frias Daisy Collins, LLP 

Dulles, VA 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Pamela J. Nestell, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute which is the subject of the appeal having been settled, the appeal is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement 

is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within 

180 days of the date of this Order. 

Dated: 6 February 2015 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59396, Appeal of Concert 

Technologies, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
§ 3902.103 Submission and review of employees' statements. ( a ) An employee required to submit a statement of employment and financial interests will be notified individually of his or her obligation to file.
( b ) An employee required to submit an FCC Form A54A, “Confidential Supplemental Statement of Employment and Financial Interests” pursuant to § 3902.102 shall submit such statement to the Designated Agency Ethics Official, on the prescribed form, not later than 30 days after his or her entrance on duty, and annually thereafter at the time the employee submits his or her SF 278 or SF/OGE Form 450.
( c ) Financial statements submitted under this subpart shall be reviewed by the Designated Agency Ethics Official.
( d ) When a statement submitted under this subpart or information from other sources indicates a potential violation of applicable laws and regulations, such as a conflict between the interests of an employee or special Government employee and the performance of his or her services for the Government, the employee concerned shall be provided an opportunity to explain and resolve the potential violation.
( e ) When, after explanation by the employee involved, the potential violation of law or regulation is not resolved, the information concerning the potential violation shall be reported to the Chairman by the Designated Agency Ethics Official for appropriate action.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A forthe period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Garrison, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The Report	fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the	Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material	respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

 

/s/ John C. Garrison                        

John C. Garrison

Chief Financial Officer

April 27, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

h0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148823

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148823

COA: 319261

Kalamazoo CC: 2012-001926-FC

DUNCAN ERIC WILLIAMS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 16, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 179.301 Scope of regulations.

These regulations apply to the collection of debts owed to the United States arising from transactions with OPM other than those involving payments made from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (the Fund), or where a request for an offset from OPM's administrative accounts—other than the Fund—is received by OPM from another Federal agency. Regulations for other agencies to request OPM's Retirement and Insurance Group to recover a debt from the Fund are provided at subpart R of part 831 and subpart D of part 845 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations. These regulations are consistent with the Federal Claims Collection Standards on Administrative Offset issued jointly by the Department of Justice and the General Accounting Office as set forth in 4 CFR 102.3.
### §883l. Contracts for surveying and mapping services

On and after February 20, 2003, the Secretary of Commerce may award contracts for hydrographic, geodetic, and photogrammetric surveying and mapping services in accordance with title IX of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949.1

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. B, title II, §206, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 77.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, 63 Stat. 377. Title IX of the Act, which was classified generally to subchapter VI (§541 et seq.) of chapter 10 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, was repealed and reenacted by Pub. L. 107–217, §§1, 6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062, 1304, as chapter 11 (§1101 et seq.) of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works. For disposition of sections of former Title 40 to revised Title 40, see Table preceding section 101 of Title 40. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 107–77, title II, § 206, Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 778.

Pub. L. 106–553, §1(a)(2) [title II, §207], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2762, 2762A–79.

Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(1) [title II, §208], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–32.

Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(b) [title II, §208], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–50, 2681–87.

Pub. L. 105–119, title II, §208, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2480.

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(a) [title II, §209], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009–41.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(a) [title II, §212], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–32.

1 See References in Text note below.