alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Brian Williams, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00082

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 5th District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 11F0304

- 5 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Brian Williams, has adequately indicated his inability to pay
costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 5, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Order filed January 7, 2014 , Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order filed

March 18, 2014

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00725

- CR

____________ JASON MICHAEL PLACID E , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1353416



### ORDER
On January 7, 2014 , this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to submit findings of fact and conclusions of law on the
voluntariness of appellant’s statement

. On March 14, 2014, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, o ur order ofJanuary 7, 2014 , is withdrawn. The appeal is reinstated. The State’s brie f is due

April 17, 2014

.
PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10- KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, John G. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1)  
           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  
           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                                       
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   March 31, 2005 | Signature/s/ John G. Sullivan  Chief Financial Officer
# L_2014165EN.01001501.xml

| 4.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/15

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Russian Federation on drug precursors

Following signature on 4 June 2013, the Government of the Russian Federation and the European Union notified on 20 February 2014 and on 21 February 2014 respectively that they had finalised their internal procedures to conclude the Agreement between the European Union and the Russian Federation on drug precursors.

The Agreement accordingly entered into force on 1 April 2014 pursuant to Article 11 thereof.

---
### Part A—Ounce of Prevention Council
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION



I, Anthony N. DeMint,
certify that:



1. I have
		reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Interbank Capital Corp.;
2. Based on
		my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
		of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
		the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
		statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
		by this report;
3. Based on
		my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
		included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
		the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
		small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
		annual report;
4. I am the
		sole officer and director and I am responsible for establishing and
		maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
		Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
		have:

> Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
> 				disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
> 				supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
> 				small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
> 				is made known to me by others within those entities,
> 				particularly during the period in which this report is being
> 				prepared;
> 		Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer
> 				disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
> 				my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
> 				controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
> 				this report based on such evaluation; and
> 		Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred
> 				during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
> 				(the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
> 				of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
> 				reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
> 				issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. I have
		disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
		financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the
		small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
		equivalent functions):

> All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
> 				design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
> 				which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
> 				business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and
> 				report financial information; and
> 		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
> 				other employees who have a significant role in the small
> 				business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: February 2,
2005





/s/ Anthony N. DeMint_________

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief Accounting
Officer
# L_2016341EN.01005201.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 341/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 341/52

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 156/2015

of 11 June 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2016/2191]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2015/559 of 9 April 2015 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2015/559 of 9 April 2015 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II and Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II and Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 1 (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Chapter XXXII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 L 0559: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/559 of 9 April 2015 (OJ L 95, 10.4.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 L 0559: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/559 of 9 April 2015 (OJ L 95, 10.4.2015, p. 1).’

Article 2

The following indent is added in point 56d (Council Directive 96/98/EC) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 L 0559: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/559 of 9 April 2015 (OJ L 95, 10.4.2015, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 L 0559: Commission Directive (EU) 2015/559 of 9 April 2015 (OJ L 95, 10.4.2015, p. 1).’

Article 3

The text of Directive (EU) 2015/559 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 June 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 5

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 June 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 95, 10.4.2015, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Antonio DeRosa, Appellant, v. Binghamton Taxicab Co., Inc., Respondent.

All concur.
O pinion filed February 3 , 2022



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

___ ___ ____ No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 19 9

- C V

____ __ ____ IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.G., E.J.G. , A.LG. II , AND E.F.G

. , C HILD REN

On Appeal from the 318 th District Court Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. FM64112

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a final order in which the trial court terminated the parental rights of the mother and the father of L.L.G., E.J.G., A.LG. II, and E.F.G.
See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 161.001 (West Supp. 20 2 1). Both parents filed a notice of appeal

. We affirm

. Each parent’s court

- appointed counsel has filed a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examine s the record and applicable law and
conclude s that the appeal is frivolous and without merit

. The brief s meet the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 , 406

– 08 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 , 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).2 Each c ounsel provided his/her client with a copy of the respective brief

. Counsel also informed the parents of their right to review the record and file a pro

se response to counsel’s brief. In compliance with Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 , 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) , each parent’s attorney provided his/her client with

a copy of the appellate record. W e conclude that both attorneys have satisfied their
dut ies under Anders , Schulman , and Kelly

. We note that neither parent has f ile d a pro se response to counsel’s Anders
brief s

. F ollowing the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record in this cause , and we agree that the appeal

— as to each parent

— is frivolous

. We note that counsel for the mother has filed in this court a motion to
withdraw as counsel for the mother. In light of a recent holding by the Texas Supreme Court, however, an Anders motion to withdraw “may be premature” if fi led in the court of appeals under the circumstances presented in this case. See In re P.M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016). The court in P.M. stated that “appointed counsel’s obligations can be satisfied by filing a petition for review that satisfies the standards
for an Anders brief.” Id. at 27

– 28. Accordingly , we must deny the motion to
withdraw that w as filed by the mother’s court

- appointed attorney

. See id. at 27

. W e deny the motion to withdraw, and we affirm the trial court’s order of
termination

.

PER CURIAM

February 3 , 2022
Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trott er , J., and Williams, J.
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10.14(c)

                                 LEASE AMENDMENT

     This LEASE AMENDMENT ("Amendment) dated as of 01/01 2003 is made by and
between CHESTERFIELD PLAZA JOINT VENTURE (hereinafter called "Landlord") and
CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND, successor in interest to Chesapeake Federal Savings
and Loan Association, (hereinafter called "Tenant").

     WHEREAS, Tenant is leasing from Landlord approximately 1,260 square feet
located in the property known as 8095-G Edwin Raynor Blvd, Pasadena, Maryland
pursuant to the Lease Agreement as Amended ("Original Leases"), dated September
22, 1987 by and between Landlord and Tenant and whereas the parties now desire
that the Original Leases shall be amended as set forth herein:

     Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree that this Lease Amendment hereby
modifies the terms of the Original Leases as set forth herein;

     1.   Defined Terms.

          Except as otherwise specifically defined herein, all terms shall have
          the same meaning as was ascribed to such terms in the Original Leases.

     2.   Renewal Period.

          The term shall be for three (3) years, commencing on December 1, 2002
          and expiring on November 30, 2005, unless otherwise terminated or
          further extended.

     3.   Rent.

          Tenants covenant and agree to pay to Landlord as rental for the entire
          Premises during the Renewal Period the following, namely:

                                    Annual Rent             Monthly Rent
                                    -----------             ------------
          12/1/02- 11/30/05         $37,420.67              $3,118.39

     4.   Option to Terminate.

          If Tenant is not then in default under this Lease or any of the
          provisions hereof, Tenant may Terminate the Lease by giving Landlord
          Twelve (12) months written notice at any time during the Renewal
          Period. The Lease

                                       1

<PAGE>

          will Terminate at the end of the calendar month that occurs 12 months
          after the date of notice.

     Except as otherwise modified herein, all provisions of the Original Leases
shall remain in full force and effect and, by their signature below, are hereby
ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date of the year first above written.

                                         LANDLORD:

                                         CHESTERFIELD PLAZA JOINT VENTURE



______________________________          BY______________________(SEAL)
WITNESS

                                         TENANT:

                                         CHESAPEAKE BANK OF MARYLAND

______________________________           /s/ Gail E. Smith      (SEAL)
WITNESS                                  -----------------------

                                       2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1788 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1788

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the minimum 
  Medicare deadlines for filing claims to take into account delay in 
  processing adjustments from secondary payor status to primary payor 
                                status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2003

 Mr. Costello introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the minimum 
  Medicare deadlines for filing claims to take into account delay in 
  processing adjustments from secondary payor status to primary payor 
                                status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT IN MINIMUM MEDICARE CLAIMS FILING DEADLINES TO 
              ACCOUNT FOR DELAY IN PROCESSING ADJUSTMENTS FROM 
              SECONDARY TO PRIMARY PAYOR STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Sections 1814(a)(1) and 1835(a)(1) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a)(1), 1395n(a)(1)) are each amended by 
inserting ``(but, in the case of items and services furnished to an 
individual during the period beginning on the date the individual's 
status under section 1862(b)(2) changes from having a group health plan 
that is primary plan to no longer having such a plan that is a primary 
plan and ending on the date of completion of the change of status, 
ending no earlier than 1 year after the date of completion of the 
change of status)'' after ``1 calendar year''.
    (b) Effective Date; Transition.--(1) The amendments made by 
subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished on or after 
August 10, 1993.
    (2) In the case of claims for items and services described in the 
matter inserted by the amendments made by subsection (a) and furnished 
on or after August 10, 1993, and before the date of the enactment of 
this Act, notwithstanding any other provision of law, the deadline for 
submission of such claims under parts A and B of title XVIII of the 
Social Security Act shall in no case expire before the end of the 1-
year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 731.404 Decision.

The decision regarding the final action must be in writing, be dated, and inform the respondent of the reasons for the decision and that an unfavorable decision may be appealed in accordance with subpart E of this part. If the decision requires removal, the employing agency must remove the appointee from the rolls within 5 work days of the agency's decision.
#### Louise Weingarten et al., Respondents, v. Janettel Holding Corporation, Appellant.

It appears upon the record that the attorney for the defendant-appellant herein died before the motion was made at Special Term or the appeal herein taken, and no order of substitution has been entered herein. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### **CHAPTER 3—PRACTICE BEFORE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE**

Sec.
[31.
Repealed.]
32.
Suspension or exclusion from practice.
33.
Unauthorized representation as practitioner.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1999**—Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4715(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–580, struck out item 31 "Regulations for agents and attorneys".

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949, substituted "PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" for "PATENT OFFICE" in chapter heading.
### §30. Grand River, Missouri, above Brunswick

Grand River in the State of Missouri above the city of Brunswick, in the county of Chariton in said State, is declared to be not a navigable stream and shall be so treated by the Secretary of the Army and by all other authorities.

(Feb. 15, 1905, ch. 574, 33 Stat. 715; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
### §10754. Evaluation

Each State, Indian Tribe, unit of local government, or community-based nonprofit organization that receives a grant under this subchapter shall submit to the Attorney General an evaluation not later than 1 year after receipt of the grant in such form and containing such information as the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, may reasonably require.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3054, as added Pub. L. 116–281, §2(a), Dec. 31, 2020, 134 Stat. 3384.)
TN: DT-07-10

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Management Directive and Handbook 2.2,

"Capital Planning and Investment Control"

Purpose: Directive and Handbook 2.2 are being eliminated because

they have been consolidated into and replaced by MD 2.8,

“Project Management Methodology (PMM).”

Note: Please remove material under Tab 2.2 and

discard. Do not remove Tab 2.2; it must remain in

place as a reserved number.

Office of Origin: Office of Information Services

Business Process Improvement and Applications Division

Contact: Myron L. Kemerer, 301-415-8735

Date Approved: June 19, 2007

Volume: 2 Information Technology

Directive: 2.2 [RESERVED]

Availability: None

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
#### Catherine Toms, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Post & McCord, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Scott, J., dissented.
§ 530.301 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* This subpart contains OPM regulations implementing 5 U.S.C. 5305, which authorizes the establishment of special rates of pay for Federal employees in executive agencies to address significant recruitment or retention problems. This subpart also contains rules for determining an employee's rate of pay when a special rate schedule is established, increased, decreased, or discontinued, or when conditions for coverage under a special rate schedule are changed. All other pay actions for special rate employees are governed by the pay-setting rules in 5 CFR parts 531 and 536.
( b ) *Applicability.* Except as explained in § 530.303(a), this subpart applies only to GS employees.
### **CHAPTER 32—POST-GRANT REVIEW**

Sec.
321.
Post-grant review.
322.
Petitions.
323.
Preliminary response to petition.
324.
Institution of post-grant review.
325.
Relation to other proceedings or actions.
326.
Conduct of post-grant review.
327.
Settlement.
328.
Decision of the Board.
329.
Appeal.
### §§741, 742. Repealed. June 6, 1940, ch. 257, §§5, 6, 54 Stat. 247

Section 741, acts May 14, 1908, ch. 168, §7, 35 Stat. 162; June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to reports of aids to navigation which might be discontinued.

Section 742, R.S. §4674; acts Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to discontinuance and reestablishment of lights.

Provisions of section 742 were substantially incorporated into sections 501 and 504 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
### §20982. Assistance for prosecution of cases cleared through use of DNA backlog clearance funds

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General may make grants to train and employ personnel to help prosecute cases cleared through use of funds provided for DNA backlog elimination.

#### (b) Authorization

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2011 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title VI, §624, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 636.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16982 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.