IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00264-CR

CYNTHIA STALEY,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. 23,333

ORDER

Appellant Cynthia Ann Staley pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to 

possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in the amount of one gram or 

more but less than four grams. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112 (West 

2017). The trial court deferred an adjudication of guilt and placed Staley on community 

supervision for five years. The State later moved to proceed to an adjudication of guilt. 

The motion alleged that Staley violated a condition of her community supervision 

because she admitted to her community supervision officer that she had used 
Staley v. State Page 2

methamphetamine. Staley pled “true” to the allegation. The trial court thereafter 

adjudicated Staley guilty and sentenced her to seven years’ imprisonment. This appeal 

ensued. 

Staley’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and Anders1 brief

with this Court. In accordance with the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Kelly v. 

State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), counsel also prepared and sent to Staley a 

Pro Se Motion for Access to Appellate Record, lacking only Staley’s signature and the 

date, and provided Staley the mailing address for this Court. See id. at 315, 320. 

We have not received the Pro Se Motion for Access to Appellate Record from 

Staley. Instead, we have received a letter from Staley in which she requests appointment

of another attorney. Staley claims that her current counsel has not responded to her 

letters, and she indicates that she has sought a copy of the appellate record from her 

current counsel but that she has been unable to obtain it.

Staley’s pro se request for another attorney is denied without prejudice. In this 

situation, the trial court retains the sole authority to relieve Staley’s current counsel of his 

duties and to replace him with other counsel. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 

26.04(a) (West Supp. 2017); Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907-08 (Tex. App.—Waco 

1999, order) (per curiam); cf. Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 688 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 

Furthermore, a defendant does not have the right to her choice of appointed counsel, and 

 

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Staley v. State Page 3

unless she waives her right to counsel and chooses to represent herself, or shows 

adequate reason for appointment of new counsel, she must accept the counsel appointed 

by the court. Rodriguez v. State, 491 S.W.3d 18, 33 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, 

pet. ref’d).

Counsel is nevertheless ORDERED to resend Staley, within 14 days from the date 

of this Order, the documentation (1) notifying her of the motion to withdraw and the 

accompanying Anders brief, and providing her a copy of each, (2) informing her of her 

right to file a pro se response and of her right to review the record preparatory to filing 

that response, and (3) informing her of her pro se right to seek discretionary review should 

the court of appeals declare her appeal frivolous. See Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 319. Counsel

is further ORDERED to simultaneously notify this Court and the State when he has 

completed this task.

In accordance with Stanley v. State, 523 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App.—Waco 2015, order) 

(per curiam), counsel is also ORDERED to obtain and send Staley, within 14 days from 

the date of this Order, copies of the clerk’s and reporter’s records and to simultaneously 

notify this Court, the State, the trial court, and the trial court clerk when he has completed 

this task. In the event that the record made available to Staley must be returned to the 

trial court clerk, counsel must notify Staley and this Court of that fact.

Counsel is reminded that there are certain rules and statutes that prohibit certain 

sensitive or illegal information from being included in a public record. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 9.10. If counsel identified any such information while conducting the review of the 
Staley v. State Page 4

record as necessary to prepare the Anders brief in support of counsel’s motion to 

withdraw, counsel should take appropriate steps to redact or in some manner remove 

that information from the copy of the record that is being provided to Staley.

Staley is ORDERED to file her pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief within 30

days from the date counsel sends notice to this Court that the record has been forwarded 

to her, unless the due date is extended by order of this Court upon proper and timely 

motion by Staley. If counsel notifies Staley and this Court that the record being provided 

to Staley was obtained from the trial court clerk and must be returned thereto, Staley is 

ORDERED to not take the record apart or mark on or modify the record.

If the record must be returned to the trial court clerk, so that its return to the trial 

court clerk can be monitored and enforced, Staley is ORDERED to send the record to this 

Court with her response. If no response is filed, but nevertheless, the record must be 

returned to the trial court clerk, Staley is ORDERED to send the record to this Court 

within 45 days of the date the attorney sends notice to the Court that the record was 

forwarded to Staley, unless the due date is extended by order of this Court upon proper 

and timely motion by Staley. 

The submission of this cause is set aside. The parties will be advised when it is 

again submitted for decision.

PER CURIAM
Staley v. State Page 5

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed March 21, 2018

Do not publish