42 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 1 / Monday, January 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

certificate to modify any other model 

included on Type Certificate No. A2NM, 

to incorporate the same novel or 

unusual design feature, the special 

conditions would apply to that model as 

well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on one 

model-series of airplanes. It is not a rule 

of general applicability and it affects 

only the applicant who applied to the 

FAA for approval of these features on 

the airplane. 

Under standard practice, the effective 

date of final special conditions would 

be 30 days after the date of publication 

in the Federal Register; however, as the 

return-to-service date for the Boeing 

Model 757 series airplane, modified by 

Continental Airlines, Inc., is imminent, 

the FAA finds that good cause exists to 

make these special conditions effective 

upon issuance. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Boeing Model 757 

series airplanes modified by Continental 

Airlines, Inc. 

1. Except as provided in paragraph 3 

of these special conditions, compliance 

with 14 CFR part 25, appendix F, parts 

IV and V, heat release and smoke 

emission, is required for seats that 

incorporate non-traditional, large, nonmetallic panels that may either be a 

single component or multiple 

components in a concentrated area in 

their design. 

2. The applicant may designate up to 

and including 1.5 square feet of nontraditional, non-metallic panel material 

per seat place that does not have to 

comply with special condition (1), 

above. A triple-seat assembly may have 

a total of 4.5 square feet excluded on 

any portion of the assembly (e.g., 

outboard-seat place 1 square foot; 

middle, 1 square foot; and inboard, 2.5 

square feet). 

3. Seats do not have to meet the test 

requirements of 14 CFR part 25, 

appendix F, parts IV and V, when 

installed in compartments that are not 

otherwise required to meet these 

requirements. Examples include: 

a. Airplanes with passenger capacities 

of 19 or fewer, 

b. Airplanes that do not have § 25.853, 

Amendment 25–61 or later, in their 

certification basis and do not need to 

comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 

121.312, and 

c. Airplanes exempted from § 25.853, 

Amendment 25–61 or later. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 18, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–31121 Filed 12–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0602; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–AEA–13] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Spencer, WV 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This action confirms the 

effective date of a direct final rule 

published in the Federal Register that 

establishes Class E Airspace at Spencer, 

WV. This action enhances the safety and 

airspace management of Boggs Field 

Airport, Spencer, WV. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 

17, 2009. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under Title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; 

telephone (404) 305–5610. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date 

The FAA published a direct final rule 

with request for comments establishing 

Class E Airspace at Boggs Field Airport, 

Spencer, WV, in the Federal Register on 

October 19, 2009 (74 FR 53407), Docket 

No. FAA–2009–0602; Airspace Docket 

No. 09–AEA–13. The FAA uses the 

direct final rulemaking procedure for a 

non-controversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

December 17, 2009. No adverse 

comments were received, and thus this 

notice confirms that effective date. 

* * * * * 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on 

December 15, 2009. 

Barry A. Knight, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. E9–30801 Filed 12–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0203; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ASO–12] 

Modification of Class D and E 

Airspace; Albemarle, NC 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action confirms the 

effective date of a direct final rule 

published in the Federal Register May 

6, 2009, that modifies Class D and Class 

E airspace at Stanly County Airport, 

Albemarle, NC. This action also corrects 

the True bearing used in the Class D 

airspace description that was stated 

incorrectly. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 11, 

2010. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; Telephone (404) 

305–5610, Fax 404–305–5572. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

The rule modifying Class D and E 

airspace for Stanly County Airport, 

Albemarle, NC, published in the 

Federal Register May 6, 2009 (74 FR 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 1 / Monday, January 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 43 

20869), became effective August 27, 

2009. Subsequent to the effective date of 

the rule, the FAA found that the True 

bearing in the Class D description for 

Stanly County Airport was stated 

incorrectly. This action corrects that 

error. 

Correction 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the reference 

to FAA Order 7400.9 for FR Doc. E9– 

10397, FAA Airspace Docket No. 09– 

ASO–12, as published in the Federal 

Register May 6, 2009 (74 FR 20869), is 

corrected as follows: 

On page 20870, column two, line 38, 

amend the language to read 

71.1 [Amended] 

* * * * * 

‘‘* * * 037° bearing from Stanly County 

Airport to 7.8 miles northeast.’’ 

Confirmation of Effective Date 

The FAA published this direct final 

rule with a request for comments 

modifying Class D and E airspace, 

Albemarle, NC in the Federal Register 

on May 6, 2009 (74 FR 20869), Docket 

No. FAA–2009–0203; Airspace Docket 

No. 09–ASO–12. The FAA uses the 

direct final rulemaking procedure for a 

non-controversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

August 27, 2009. No adverse comments 

were received, and thus this notice 

confirms that effective date. 

* * * * * 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on 

December 9, 2009. 

Barry A. Knight, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. E9–30286 Filed 12–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0651; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–AEA–15] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Beckley, WV 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule, confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This action confirms the 

effective date of a direct final rule 

published in the Federal Register that 

modifies Class E airspace at Raleigh 

County Memorial Airport, Beckley, WV. 

This rule increases the safety and 

management of the aircraft operations at 

Raleigh County Memorial Airport. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 

17, 2009. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support 

Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; Telephone (404) 

305–5610, Fax 404–305–5572. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date 

The FAA published a direct final rule 

with request for comments modifying 

Class E Airspace at Raleigh County 

Memorial Airport, Beckley, WV, in the 

Federal Register on October 19, 2009 

(74 FR 53408), Docket No. FAA–2009– 

0651; Airspace Docket No. 09–AEA–15). 

The FAA uses the direct final 

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

December 17, 2009. No adverse 

comments were received, and thus this 

notice confirms that effective date. 

* * * * * 

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on 

December 15, 2009. 

Barry A. Knight, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 

Organization. 

[FR Doc. E9–30800 Filed 12–31–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0652; Airspace 

Docket 09–ASO–21] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Sarasota, FL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Direct final rule, confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This action confirms the 

effective date of a direct final rule 

published in the Federal Register that 

modifies the Class E airspace at 

Sarasota/Bradenton International 

Airport, Sarasota, FL. This rule 

increases the safety and management of 

the aircraft operations at Sarasota/ 

Bradenton International Airport. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

December 17, 2009. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 

51, subject to the annual revision of 

FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melinda Giddens, Operations Support, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–5610. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date 

The FAA published a direct final rule 

with request for comments modifying 

Class E Airspace at Sarasota/Bradenton 

International Airport, Sarasota, FL, in 

the Federal Register on September 14, 

2009 (74 FR 46898), Docket No. FAA– 

2009–0652; Airspace Docket 09–ASO– 

21. The FAA uses the direct final 

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES