alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 831.1801 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the procedures to be followed by a Federal agency when it requests the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to recover a debt owed to the United States by administrative offset against money due and payable to the debtor from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (the Fund). This subpart also prescribes the procedures that OPM must follow to make these administrative offsets.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1987 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1987

  To designate the air traffic control tower at Newark International 
Airport in Newark, New Jersey, as the ``William J. `Whitey' Conrad Air 
                        Traffic Control Tower''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2003

 Mr. Payne (for himself, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Andrews, Mr. Ferguson, 
 Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Holt, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Menendez, Mr. 
 Pallone, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Rothman, Mr. Saxton, and Mr. Smith of New 
   Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the air traffic control tower at Newark International 
Airport in Newark, New Jersey, as the ``William J. `Whitey' Conrad Air 
                        Traffic Control Tower''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The air traffic control tower located at Newark International 
Airport in Newark, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the 
``William J. `Whitey' Conrad Air Traffic Control Tower''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the air traffic control tower referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William J. 
`Whitey' Conrad Air Traffic Control Tower''.
                                 <all>
```
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTExhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Clyde R. Parks, certify that:1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Moliris Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.September 1, 2005/s/ Clyde R. ParksClyde R. Parks Principal Executive Officer
28
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0055 - REPORT TO CONGRESS ON ABNORMAL OCCURRENCES:  FISCAL YEAR 2005

Accession Number: ML053480028

Date Released: Friday, May 5, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML053480034 - SECY-06-0055 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences: Fiscal Year 2005 (4 page(s), 3/9/2006)
    - ML053480044 - SECY-06-0055 - Enclosure 1 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences Fiscal Year 2005 (32 page(s), 3/9/2006)
    - ML053480062 - SECY-06-0055 - Enclosures 2 and 3: Senate/House Letters (2 page(s), 3/9/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 731.402 Notice of proposed action. ( a ) The agency must notify the applicant or appointee (hereinafter, the “respondent”) in writing of the proposed action, the charges against the respondent, and the availability for review, upon request, of the materials relied upon. The notice must set forth the specific reasons for the proposed action and state that the respondent has the right to answer the notice in writing. The notice must further inform the respondent of the time limit for the answer as well as the address to which such answer must be delivered.
( b ) The notice must inform the respondent that he or she may be represented by a representative of the respondent's choice and that if the respondent wishes to have such a representative, the respondent must designate the representative in writing.
( c ) The agency must serve the notice of proposed action upon the respondent by mail or hand delivery no less than 30 days prior to the effective date of the proposed action to the respondent's last known residence or duty station.
( d ) If the respondent is employed in a position covered by this part on the date the notice is served, the respondent is entitled to be retained in a pay status during the notice period.
SERVED: JANUARY 25, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-1267 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011AL030047) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative La 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

F~deral Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of Brent R. Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

ONE COPY 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7th Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

DMS No .. FAA-2012-1267 

( ivil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, se the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Buil ing-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
### §2300. Study of Corps capabilities

The Secretary shall study and evaluate the measures necessary to increase the capabilities of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to undertake the planning and construction of water resources projects on an expedited basis and to adequately comply with all requirements of law applicable to the water resources program of the Corps of Engineers. As part of such study the Secretary shall consider appropriate measures to increase reliance on the private sector in the conduct of the water resources program of the Corps of Engineers. The Secretary shall implement such measures as may be necessary to improve the capabilities referred to in the first sentence of this section, including the establishment of increased levels of personnel, changes in project planning and construction procedures designed to lessen the time required for such planning and construction, and procedures for expediting the coordination of water resources projects with Federal, State, and local agencies.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §936, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4197.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### GAO Review of Civil Works Program

Pub. L. 100–676, §44, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4041, provided that the Comptroller General was to conduct a review of the Civil Works Program of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and to transmit the review to Congress with any recommendations the Comptroller General may make.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-002 January 10, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC REVOKES LICENSE OF A MISSOURI COMPANY AND PROHIBITS ITS OWNER

FROM INVOLVEMENT IN NRC-LICENSED ACTIVITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff issued an Order Dec. 30 to KTL Roudebush Testing,

located in Kansas City, Missouri, revoking its NRC license to use nuclear material. In addition, an

Order was issued the same day to its owner prohibiting his involvement from all NRC-licensed

activities for deliberately violating safety requirements and providing false information to the agency.

KTL Roudebush held an NRC license to possess and use radioactive material for radiography,

which uses sealed radiation sources to make x-ray like images of heavy metal objects like pumps,

valves, and pipes.

The Order revoking the license required the company to transfer all NRC-licensed materials to

authorized recipients and provide proof that all transferred materials have been leak-tested and securely

transferred. The Order prohibiting NRC-licensed activity prohibited Christopher V. Roudebush, the

company owner, president and radiation safety officer from engaging in any NRC licensed activities

for five years from the date of the Order. 

An NRC inspection and followup investigation by the agency’s Office of Investigations found

numerous violations of NRC safety requirements and multiple instances of providing the NRC with

incomplete and inaccurate information. As a result, on March 11, 2004, the NRC issued a Suspension

Order requiring the company to immediately stop all work involving NRC-licensed radioactive

materials (refer to NRC press release No 3-04-012, issued March 16, 2004). The Suspension Order

remained in effect until the license was terminated.

“Our license holders have a responsibility to follow the NRC’s regulations designed to protect

public health and safety. We also rely on them to provide the NRC with complete and accurate

information. Because the company and its owner failed to follow through on these responsibilities, we

are barring them from handling NRC-licensed materials,” said James Caldwell, Regional

Administrator for the NRC’s Region III office in Lisle, IL. 

The license holder may request a hearing by January 19.

Copies of the Order can be accessed at the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-wedo/regulatory/enforcement/current.html . 

###
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30,                2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                BioTex Holdings, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                October 19, 2007                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| */s/                Scott J. Silverman     *                                         |
| Scott                J. SilvermanChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bruker Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank H. Laukien, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



Date: March 1, 2011

By:

/s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D. Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D. President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

                      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In connection with the Report of Allegheny Bancshares, Inc.(the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Loving,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      No purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled
to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except
as required by law.

                                          /s/  WILLIAM A. LOVING. JR.
                                          ---------------------------
                                          William A. Loving, Jr.
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                          May 6, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Timothy D. Kahlenberg, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of XTENT, Inc. onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of XTENT, Inc.
| Date: August 13, 2007 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
| By:                        |   | /s/ Timothy D. Kahlenberg |   |
|                       |   | Timothy D. Kahlenberg |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                       |   | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |

 

----
115 STAT. 214 PUBLIC LAW 107–32—AUG. 20, 2001

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 821:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):

Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Public Law 107–32

107th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1030 South

Church Street in Asheboro, North Carolina, as the ‘‘W. Joe Trogdon Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1030 South Church Street in Asheboro, North Carolina, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘W. Joe Trogdon Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W. Joe

Trogdon Post Office Building’’.

Approved August 20, 2001.

Aug. 20, 2001

[H.R. 821]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-037 March 25, 2004

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO MEET APRIL 15-17 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting April 15-17 in Rockville, Md. The committee will discuss, among other items, the

license renewal application for the R.E. Ginna nuclear power plant, and proposed options and

recommendations for containment structures of non-light-water reactors.

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two

White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. The meetings will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. 

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2004 .

For additional information, please contact Sam Duraiswamy, at 301-415-7364, Monday through

Friday between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.

###
#### Estelle M. Greenberg, Appellant, v. William Z. Greenberg, Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 31, 2015

p0323

Order 

Clerk

March 31, 2015

149486(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149486

COA: 320527

Kalamazoo CC: 2010-001165-FC

DAVID FRANKLIN McNEES, JR., Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 30, 

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
Order entered March 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01522-CV

ALICIA AND UVENCE GARZA AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 8529 SANTA 

CLARA DRIVE, FRISCO, TX 75034, Appellant

V.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-02123-2013

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated December 5, 2013, 

we informed appellant the Court Reporter had notified us that the reporter’s record had not been 

filed because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to 

pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification she had 

requested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been 

found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered 

submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the required 

documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s 
record. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s 

brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE