alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015311EN.01003801.xml

| 26.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 285/2014

of 12 December 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2015/2152]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 of 11 August 2014 on new rail passenger services (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 of 11 August 2014 on new rail passenger services (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is added after 42a (Council Directive 95/18/EC) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘42aa. | 32014 R 0869: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 of 11 August 2014 on new rail passenger services (OJ L 239, 12.8.2014, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘42aa.

32014 R 0869: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 of 11 August 2014 on new rail passenger services (OJ L 239, 12.8.2014, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 869/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 13 December 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee incorporating Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council into the EEA Agreement, whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 239, 12.8.2014, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
**OCT**
               JAN
				Feb11
				Next capture**2008**
               2010
				2011**19 captures**
           29 Oct 05 - 11 Jan 10
   Close
       Help


| |                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Relative Poverty Rates in Appalachia, 1980(County Rates as a Percentage of the U.S. Average)

|A poverty rate is the ratio of the persons below poverty level 
to the total number of persons for whom poverty status has been 
determined. The percent of the U.S. average is computed by dividing the 
county poverty rate by the national average and multiplying by 100. The 
map uses critical breaks such as the national average to organize the 
data into groups of common values.


Source and Methodology



      Downloadable filesPDF version of the map (990 KB)Excel file of supporting data for the map (70KB) | This map shows the poverty rate in each of the ARC counties, as a percentage of the U.S. average. The Appalachian rates range from 45.1% to 389.5% of the U.S. average. The U.S. average is 12.4%. The Appalachian average is 14.1%. For a list of county data by state, see the downloadable Excel file.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6632

VANCE KINGSBURY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL GAINES, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-93-7) Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 19, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vance Kingsbury, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel M. Cisin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Washington, D.C.; Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Vance Kingsbury seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); see Madley v. Parole Comm’n , 278 F.3d 1306, 1309-10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kingsbury has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1639.11 Cross-servicing agreement with the Department of the Treasury.

The Board will enter into a cross-servicing agreement with the Department of the Treasury which will authorize Treasury to take all of the debt collection actions described in this part. These debt collection services will be provided to the Board in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3701 *et seq.*
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1834 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1834

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
        coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel TRUE BLUE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2003

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
        coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel TRUE BLUE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and 
sections 12106 and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and 
fisheries for the vessel TRUE BLUE (United States official number 
947297).
                                 <all>
```
#### § 537.101 Purpose.

This part implements 5 U.S.C. 5379, which authorizes agencies to establish a student loan repayment program for the purpose of recruiting or retaining highly qualified personnel. Under such a program, an agency may agree to repay (by direct payment to the loan holder on behalf of the employee) all or part of any outstanding qualifying student loan or loans previously taken out by a job candidate to whom an offer of employment has been made, or by a current employee of the agency.
§ 537.110 Records and reports. ( a ) Each agency must keep a record of each determination to provide student loan repayment benefits under this part and make such records available for review upon request by OPM. Such a record may be destroyed when 3 years have elapsed since the end of the service period specified in the employee's service agreement unless any dispute has arisen regarding the agreement. If the service agreement has not been fulfilled, there are other disputes regarding the agreement or the loan payouts, or the agreement has become the subject of litigation, the records should be kept until the agency is notified by agency counsel that all pending claims have been resolved, all litigation concluded, and any applicable periods for seeking further review has elapsed and, in any event, for a minimum of 6 years from the date the facts giving rise to the dispute occurred. If debt collection is pursued against the employee for repayments made by the agency, the agency must keep the records until the agency is notified by agency counsel that the debt is fully collected, compromised, or settled finally and that any applicable period for seeking further review has elapsed.
( b ) By March 31st of each year, each agency must submit a written report to OPM containing information about student loan repayment benefits it provided to employees during the previous calendar year. Each report must include the following information: ( 1 ) The number of employees who received student loan repayment benefits;
( 2 ) The job classifications of the employees who received student loan repayment benefits; and
( 3 ) The cost to the Federal Government of providing student loan repayment benefits.
### §12. Port Arthur Ship Canal

After there shall be conveyed to the United States, free of cost, a valid title to the line of water communication between Taylors Bayou and Sabine Pass, in the State of Texas, known as the Port Arthur Ship Canal, together with a valid title to the turning basin as existing June 19, 1906, and to the artificial slip on which the lumber dock of the Port Arthur Canal and Dock Company is built, the said waterways shall thereupon become free public waters of the United States, and be subject to the laws enacted by Congress for the maintenance, preservation, protection, and regulation of navigable waters: Provided, That the company or corporation conveying title to said canal as aforesaid shall also convey to the United States, free of cost, the fee to a strip of land one hundred and fifty feet wide along the westerly margin of the canal, except that where the right of way of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company prevents the transfer of such strip of land along the westerly margin of said canal there shall be conveyed such strip on the easterly margin thereof as may be necessary to make up such one hundred and fifty feet of width, with the reservation that until Congress shall have authorized and provided for the enlargement and widening of said canal the said company or corporation, its successors or assigns, shall have the right to control, occupy, and use the said strip of land and every part thereof in the same manner and to the same extent as before the execution and delivery of the conveyance, and also the right to transfer, lease, sell, quitclaim, or otherwise dispose of said property and every part thereof, subject to the grant made to the United States. The charges for the use of said docks and wharves shall be just and reasonable and shall not be greater than charges for similar services at other ports of the United States on the Gulf of Mexico.

(June 19, 1906, ch. 3436, §1, 34 Stat. 302.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section is from a proviso following provisions establishing an additional collection district in the State of Texas to be known as the district of Sabine; the establishment of the said district being conditioned on the making of the conveyance referred to in this section.

Further provisions of the said proviso authorizing the Secretary of War to accept the said waterways as the property of the United States, and directing that the Act take effect only when the requirements of the section be fully complied with to the satisfaction of the Secretary of War, have been omitted as executed and obsolete.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 15d-14(a) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Philip Keipp, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Waterworks, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting;  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: April 27, 2005
    /s/ Philip KeippPhilip KeippVice President and Chief Financial Officer 20
#### § 550.152 [Reserved]
§ 2422.18 What is the purpose of a representation hearing and what procedures are followed? ( a ) *Purpose of a hearing.* Representation hearings are considered investigatory and not adversarial. The purpose of the hearing is to develop a full and complete record of relevant and material facts.
( b ) *Conduct of hearing.* Hearings will be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the Hearing Officer. There is no burden of proof, with the exception of proceedings on objections to elections under § 2422.27(b). Formal rules of evidence do not apply.
( c ) *Hearing officer.* The Regional Director appoints a hearing officer to conduct a hearing. Another hearing officer may be substituted for the presiding Hearing Officer at any time.
( d ) *Transcript.* An official reporter will make the official transcript of the hearing. Copies of the official transcript may be examined in the appropriate Regional Office during normal working hours. Parties should contact the official hearing reporter to purchase copies of the official transcript.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         92,891
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              127,519
<PP&E>                                        264,928
<DEPRECIATION>                                129,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                433,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         845,583
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        3,131
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,040,996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  433,010
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,131,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             92,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,131,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,131,404)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,131,404)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)



</TABLE>
A. Field Process McElmo Creek unit isa C02 flood designed to enhance oil recovery. C02 is delivered to the unit via pipeline (KinderMorgan gas plant from the Shell Dome). The dome is approximately 25 miles north ofthe McElmo Creek Unit. The method used to flood the unit is Water/Alternating/Gas (WAG) sytem.

McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production: WaterProduction: C02 Purchased: Gas Re-injection 3700 BOPD 26,000BWPD 12KCF 23KCF Approximately 90 producing wells send full well stream, (oil, gas and water) to either a satellite ofone of4 batteries. There are 11 satellites that function as testing facilities for producing wells. As stated above, not all wells go into a satellite, several wells are directed straight into a Battery. (see flow diagrams for more detail)

Oil is sold at the LACT unit at each Central Tank Batteryto Giant Refinery through Running Horse Pipeline (owned & operatedby Navajo Nation)

Water is separated and re-injected via the water injection station. Gas is sent to the Plantand processed as described below.
B. Plant and Process Overview The McElmo Creek Compression Plant serves tertiary recovery operations for the McElmo Creek Field. The goal ofthe Plant is to receive produced gas through a gathering system, pressure the gas up to a suitable working pressure then re-inject the gas to maintain reservoirpressure. The natural gas is injected with produced water in a dual injection system. Due to varying waterinjection demands in the field, and to the number ofwells being serviced at any time, the Plant inlet volume can vary between 10 and 18 million standard cubic feet per day (MSCFD).

To describe the plantprocess in more detail, the gas is processed in three main steps: inlet separation, compression and re-injection.
Inlet Separation. The inlet separation consists ofan inlet slug receiver which collects free liquids. The gas then passes through filter vessels which collect any incoming solids. Compression. The Plant consists offour high-speed electrically-drivenreciprocating compressors which utilize 6300 Brake Horsepower (BHP). Each compressor consists offour stages which raise the pressure ofthe incoming gas from 40 psig to 2900 psig. Each stage has a dedicated aerial cooler and liquid scrubber vessel. On the largest compressor, inter stage dehydration takes place to remove water for corrosion mitigation.**I~** \

Re-Injection. The four units discharge into a single header, where purchased C02 is co-mingled to achieve a daily injection goal of24 MSCFD. The gas is then distributed to the field. During Plantupsets, additional C02 is purchased to meet the daily injection goal.
Exhibit 32.1



                                 CERTIFICATION

                   Certification of Chief Executive Officer
          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William G. Forhan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

  2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods presented in this Report.







Date: May 21, 2007	By: /s/ William G. Forhan
			William G. Forhan
			President and Chief Executive Officer

<page>