alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015230EN.01004901.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/49

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 241/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1465]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 545/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 545/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Point 18a (Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| (1) | the following indent is added:






  ‘— | 32014 R 0545: Regulation (EU) No 545/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 (OJ L 163, 29.5.2014, p. 10).’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

the following indent is added:

‘—

32014 R 0545: Regulation (EU) No 545/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 (OJ L 163, 29.5.2014, p. 10).’;

| (2) | the introductory phrase to the adaptations and the adaptations shall be replaced by the following:

  ‘The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:
  This Regulation shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

the introductory phrase to the adaptations and the adaptations shall be replaced by the following:

‘The provisions of the Regulation shall, for the purposes of this Agreement, be read with the following adaptation:

This Regulation shall not apply to Liechtenstein.’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 545/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 163, 29.5.2014, p. 10.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §21304. Application

A State seeking an increase in the amount provided to the State under the covered formula grants shall include in the application of the State for each covered formula grant such information as the Attorney General may reasonably require, including information about the law described in section 21303 of this title.

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IV, §405, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043h–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### **CHAPTER 49—INTEGRATED COASTAL AND OCEAN OBSERVATION SYSTEM**

Sec.
3601.
Purposes.
3602.
Definitions.
3603.
Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observing System.
3604.
Interagency financing and agreements.
3605.
Application with other laws.
3606.
Report to Congress.
3607.
Public-private use policy.
3608.
Repealed.
3609.
Intent of Congress.
3610.
Authorization of appropriations.
3611.
Assessing and modeling named storms over coastal States.
3612.
Accelerating innovation at Cooperative Institutes.
3613.
Blue Economy valuation.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Vanessa Avila, Chief Financial Officer of Tortuga Mexican Imports Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tortuga Mexican Imports Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 27, 2005

/s/ Vanessa Avila		Vanessa Avila
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ROBERT JAMES SCHEAFFER, Jr.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-30004

D.C. No. 4:13-cr-00084-BMM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Robert James Scheaffer, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges a special condition of supervised release imposed following his guiltyplea conviction for sexual abuse of a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a)

FILED

JUN 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Scheaffer’s request for oral

argument is denied.
and 2243(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and

remand.

Scheaffer challenges the district court’s imposition of Special Condition 10,

which prohibits him from associating with minors in several ways. As the

government concedes, the portion of the condition prohibiting Scheaffer from

dating or socializing with any person he knows to have minor children is

overbroad. See United States v. Wolf Child, 699 F.3d 1082, 1100-02 (9th Cir.

2012). We, therefore, vacate the condition and remand for the district court to

consider whether to impose a similar but more narrowly drawn condition. See id.

at 1103. In light of this disposition, we do not reach Scheaffer’s challenge to the

other portions of the special condition. Schaeffer may raise those arguments on

remand if the district court elects to impose a similar condition.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 14-30004
§ 581.101 Purpose. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section 407 of title 42, United States Code, section 5301 of title 38, United States Code, and sections 8346 and 8470 of title 5, United States Code), section 659 of title 42, United States Code, as amended, provides that moneys, the entitlement to which is based upon remuneration for employment, due from, or payable by, the United States or the District of Columbia to any individual, shall be subject, in like manner and to the same extent as if the United States or the District of Columbia were a private person: ( 1 ) To legal process for the enforcement of an obligor's legal obligations to provide child support, alimony, or both, resulting from an action brought by an individual obligee; and
( 2 ) To withholding in accordance with State law enacted pursuant to subsections (a)(1) and (b) of section 666 of title 42, United States Code, and to regulations of the Secretary of Health and Human Services under such subsections, and to any other legal process brought by a State agency subject to regulations of the Secretary of Health and Human Services that is administering a program under an approved State plan to enforce the legal obligations of obligors to provide child support and alimony.
( b ) Section 659 of title 42, United States Code, as amended, provides further that each governmental entity shall be subject to the same requirements as would apply if the governmental entity were a private person, except as set forth in this part.
[63 FR 14757, Mar. 26, 1998]
EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION

Durham Transport, Inc.

This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board

concerning the status of Durham Transport, Inc. (DTI) as an

employer under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et sea. )

(RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 

et sea.) (RUIA).

Although DTI began as a non-carrier, upon its acquisition and

operation of 12 miles of rail line within the Raritan Center

Industrial Park, it became a class III rail carrier. See

Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) Finance Docket No. 31917.

According to information provided in December 1992 and November

1994, by Mr. G. D. Crane, President of DTI, DTI interchanges with

Conrail. Mr. Crane describes DTI's operations as "switching

service at Raritan Industrial Park". DTI began operations on

August 1, 1994, and has four employees who were first compensated

on October 29, 1994.

Section 1(a)(1) of the Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) (45 U.S.C.

§ 231(a)(1)), insofar as relevant here, defines a covered employer

as:

(i) any express company, sleeping-car company, and

carrier by railroad, subject to subchapter I of chapter

105 of Title 49; ... .

Section 1(a) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA)

(45 U.S.C. §§ 351(a)) contains a substantially similar definition.

The evidence establishes that DTI is a carrier by rail engaged in

the transportation of persons or property in interstate commerce.

Accordingly, it is determined that Durham Transport, Inc. became a

rail carrier employer under the Railroad Retirement and Railroad

Unemployment Insurance Acts effective August 1, 1994, the date it

began operations.

Glen L. Bower

Jerome F. Kever

BCD 1995-35 BA # 2362
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chaolei
Marketing and Finance Company for the period ending March 31, 2008,
I,  Fan
Luo, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Chaolei
Marketing and Finance Company  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.
            Such
      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
      the period ended March 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chaolei
      Marketing and Finance Company




Date: May
19, 2008





Chaolei Marketing and Finance
      CompanyBy:
      /s/ Fan
      LuoFan
      Luo
              Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer
================================================================================

EXHIIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for
the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Dated: April 2, 2007                         /s/ Mark Hlady
                                             ----------------------
                                             Name: Mark Hlady
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: April 2, 2007                         /s/ William Brimacombe
                                             ----------------------
                                             Name: William Brimacombe
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §3072. Eligibility for veterans benefits and other rights, privileges, immunities, and benefits under certain provisions of law

#### (a) In general

Active service of officers of the Administration shall be deemed to be active military service for the purposes of all rights, privileges, immunities, and benefits under the following:

(1) Laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

(2) The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act [50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.].

(3) Section 410 of title 42, as in effect before September 1, 1950.

#### (b) Exercise of authority

In the administration of the laws and regulations referred to in subsection (a), with respect to the Administration, the authority vested in the Secretary of Defense and the Secretaries of the military departments and their respective departments shall be exercised by the Secretary of Commerce.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §262, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3092; Pub. L. 108–189, §2(g), Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2866.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is act Oct. 17, 1940, ch. 888, 54 Stat. 1178, which is classified principally to chapter 50 (§3901 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in sections 857 and 857–3(a) of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.

#### Amendments

2003—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 108–189 amended par. (2) generally substituting "The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act" for "The Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940 (50 App. U.S.C. 501 et seq.)".
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1876 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1876

To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to provide, in the case of an employee welfare benefit plan providing 
benefits in the event of disability, an exemption from preemption under 
 such title for State tort actions to recover damages arising from the 
          failure of the plan to timely provide such benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2003

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 
 to provide, in the case of an employee welfare benefit plan providing 
benefits in the event of disability, an exemption from preemption under 
 such title for State tort actions to recover damages arising from the 
          failure of the plan to timely provide such benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM ERISA PREEMPTION FOR STATE CAUSES OF ACTION 
              IN TORT TO RECOVER DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE FAILURE OF A 
              PLAN PROVIDING BENEFITS IN THE EVENT OF DISABILITY TO 
              TIMELY PROVIDE SUCH BENEFITS.

     Section 514(b) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (9) as paragraph (10); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the following new 
        paragraph:
    ``(9) Subsection (a) shall not be construed to preclude, in the 
case of an employee welfare benefit plan providing benefits in the 
event of disability, any cause of action in tort under State law to 
recover damages arising from the failure of such plan to timely provide 
such benefits.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

     The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
failures occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §12632. Extension of authorizations of appropriations for fiscal years for which full amount authorized is not appropriated

If, in making an appropriation under any provision of this Act or amendment made by this Act that authorizes the making of an appropriation for a certain purpose for a certain fiscal year in a certain amount, the Congress makes an appropriation for that purpose for that fiscal year in a lesser amount, that provision or amendment shall be considered to authorize the making of appropriations for that purpose for later fiscal years in an amount equal to the difference between the amount authorized to be appropriated and the amount that has been appropriated.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXI, §310003, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2105.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–322, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1796, known as the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1994 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14213 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Thad
M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                       By: /s/ Thad M. Brown
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Thad M. Brown,
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           March 25, 2003
exv10w20



 





Exhibit 10.20




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     This Amendment, dated as of January 9, 2004 (this “Amendment”), to the
Employment Agreement, dated as of February 17, 1999 (the “agreement”), is
entered into between AptarGroup, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Emil Meshberg (the “Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement in
order to modify certain terms of the Agreement as provided herein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:





	 	 	 
	 	1.	Section 3. Compensation , (e) Life Insurance of the Agreement is
amended by deleting the first sentence thereof and substituting
therefore the following sentence:
	 
	 	 	“During the Employment Period, the Company shall cause Emson Research,
Inc. at it’s cost, to provide the Executive with a term life insurance
policy with a Face Value of $1,200,000.”
	 
	 	2.	In all other respects, the Agreement, and previous Amendment, shall
not be amended and shall remain in full force and effect.






     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this
Amendment as of the date first above written.

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	APTARGROUP, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Stephen J. Hagge
 	 
	 	 	Stephen J. Hagge 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE

 	 
	 	  	/s/ Emil Meshberg
 	 
	 	 	Emil Meshberg