alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-038 March 23, 2007

JANICE DUNN LEE APPOINTED DEPUTY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE OECD/NEA;

MARGARET DOANE APPOINTED OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS

DIRECTOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced the appointment of Janice Dunn Lee as the

Deputy Director General of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear

Energy Agency (OECD/NEA) in Paris. Margaret M. Doane become the Director of NRC’s Office of

International Programs position in mid-July upon Dunn Lee’s departure.

“Ms. Dunn Lee’s appointment,” said Chairman Dale Klein, “will greatly enhance NRC’s

relationship with the OECD/NEA and confirms our commitment for cooperation with the international

nuclear regulatory community.”

Dunn Lee began her federal career in 1975 as an intern with the NRC and has held a number of

progressively responsible positions in the international field. She served as Special Assistant for

International Policy to former Chairmen Lando Zech, Kenneth Carr, Ivan Selin, and Shirley Ann

Jackson. Since 1999, she has served as the Director of the Office of International Programs.

Dunn Lee received her Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology from the University of California

at Berkeley and a Master of Arts degree in International Relations from The Fletcher School of Law

and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

The OECD is an intergovernmental organization of industrialized countries based in Paris,

France. Through the NEA it assists member nations in maintaining and further developing, through

international cooperation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for the safe,

environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes.

“I am looking forward to contributing to the critical role that the NEA will have in enhancing

safe nuclear power during the potential nuclear renaissance gathering speed around the world,” said

Dunn Lee. 

Upon Dunn Lee’s departure, Doane will become Director of the Office of International

Programs. She has served as the Deputy Director of that office since 2004. 

Doane began her career at the NRC in 1991 as a Special Assistant in the Office of the Secretary

and then served as an attorney in the Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication through 1998. She

then served as Commissioner Jeffrey S. Merrifield’s Legal Counsel and Chief of Staff from 1998 to
2004. Before joining the NRC, Doane served for three years as an attorney advisor for the

Department of Veterans Affairs, Board of Veterans Appeals. 

Doane received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Loyola College in Baltimore and

law degree from the University of Maryland.

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-07-24                                                                       April 25, 2007CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416       E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO MEET WITH WESTINGHOUSE NUCLEAR FUEL PLANTOFFICIALS TO DISCUSS FACILITY SAFETY PERFORMANCE

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with officials of the Westinghousecommercial nuclear fuel plant in Columbia, S.C., on Thursday, April 26, to discuss the agency’s latestreview of the facility’s safety performance.        

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. in the Red Roomof the South Carolina State Museum, located at 301 Gervais Street in Columbia.  The NRC staff willpresent the results of the review and be available to respond to questions or comments from the publicbefore the close of the meeting. 

The NRC staff will discuss with Westinghouse safety performance in the major areas of safetyoperations, radiological controls, facility support and special topics.   The evaluation covers a periodfrom Feb. 18, 2006, through Feb.12, 2007.

The review found that Westinghouse had conducted its activities safely during the period ofreview.  The NRC said Westinghouse’s human performance improvement efforts, which includedretraining and re-qualification of operators, implementation of a rigorous audit program, improvementsto the plant’s corrective action program, and improved implementation of the quality assuranceprogram, contributed to an overall improvement in performance.  

The NRC has determined that, based on plant performance during the period of evaluation, noadditional inspection effort will be required this year, and the agency has implemented its regularinspection program for the Westinghouse category of fuel fabrication facility. 

A copy of the NRC letter to Westinghouse which outlines details of the review is available bycontacting OPA2@nrc.gov or from the NRC web site athttp://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html as document ML060750108. 

###
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Maternity Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Judd P. Tirnauer, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ JUDD P. TIRNAUER                           
|Judd P. Tirnauer                               
|Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|February 9, 2010
### §9109. Exclusion of a wholly owned Government corporation from this chapter

When the President considers it practicable and in the public interest, the President shall include in the budget submitted to Congress under section 1105 of this title a recommendation that a wholly owned Government corporation be deemed to be an agency (except a corporation) under chapter 11 of this title and for fiscal matters. If Congress approves the recommendation, the corporation is deemed to be an agency (except a corporation) under chapter 11 and for fiscal matters for fiscal years beginning after the fiscal year of approval and is not subject to this chapter. The corporate entity is not affected by this section.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1045.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9109 | 31:852. | Dec. 6, 1945, ch. 577, §107, 59 Stat. 599. |

The word "President" is substituted for "Director of the Office of Management and Budget" because sections 101 and 102(a) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (eff. July 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 2085) designated the Bureau of the Budget as the Office of Management and Budget and transferred all functions of the Bureau to the President. The words "with the approval of the President" are omitted because of the restatement. The word "considers" is substituted for "deemed" for consistency. The words "in connection with the budget program of such corporation" are omitted as surplus. The words "submitted to Congress under section 1105 of this title" are added for clarity. The words "deemed to be" are substituted for "treated . . . as if it were" for consistency. The word "agency" is substituted for "Government agency" and "establishment" because of section 101 of the revised title and for consistency. The words "if it were", "appropriations, expenditures, receipts, accounts, and other", and "in connection with the budget program for any fiscal year" are omitted as surplus. The words "deemed to be" are substituted for "regarded as" for consistency.
#### John I. Howe, Jr., Respondent, v. Gustav A. Gubitz and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Isidor H. Aaron and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-047 March 11, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE TO MEET 

MARCH 15-17 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste will hold a

public meeting March 15-17, in Rockville, Md., where, among other items, members will brief the

NRC Commissioners on issues previously reviewed at the Commission’s request. The members will

also receive a briefing on research on the estimation of groundwater recharge techniques and methods,

and discuss the status of the NRC review of the USEC license application for a proposed gas centrifuge

uranium enrichment facility in Ohio. 

The session on Tuesday will run from 10:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The Wednesday session will run

from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m., and the session on Thursday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. All sessions

will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike,

except the meeting with the NRC Commissioners, which will take place from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

on Wednesday in the Commissioners Conference Room in One White Flint North. 

For more information on the meeting, contact Sharon Steele, at 301-415-6805. A complete

agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2005/ . 

# # #
#### John G. Hale, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward A. Ferguson et al., Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 18,752.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodobe Bbentano, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Bill by John Q-. Hale against Edward A. Ferguson, Union Central Life Insurance Company and Charles W. Sampson to enjoin the collection of a judgment entered against complainant in favor of Ferguson on a promissory note, and also to enjoin the collection of a judgment recovered on an appeal bond. A demurrer was filed setting up that the face of the bill showed that the matter was *res adjudicaba*and that there had been laches in prosecuting it. The demurrer was sustained and the bill dismissed. Later the complainant moved to vacate the order of dismissal and to make Lelia H. Hale a party complainant and the motion was denied. Thereupon complainant sued out a writ of error.

Previous to the filing of the bill, Ferguson recovered a judgment against the complainant on a promissory note before a justice of the peace, and on appeal to the Circuit Court a judgment was entered for the same amount, and from the judgment Hale appealed to the Appellate Court and the judgment was affirmed. After this affirmance, Ferguson failing to obtain satisfaction of his judgment brought suit against the surety on the appeal bond (one Lelia H. Hale) and obtained a judgment. On appeal from the judgment to the Appellate Court the judgment was affirmed. See 162 Ill. App. 523.

*157Edward J. Kelley, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendants in error.

Abstract of the Decision.

Judgment, § *311*
      ***
      *—when dismissal of Mil to enjoin enforcement of judgment proper.*On bill to enjoin the collection of a judgment recovered against complainant on a promissory note on the ground that there was fraud in the execution of the note and a partial failure of consideration, *held*that a decree dismissing the bill was proper, that the matter set up in the bill would have been, available in law as well as in equity, and that the matter was *res adjudicata*in the Superior Court and in the Appellate Court.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Brown

delivered the opinion of the court.
Order entered March 18, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01434
- CV KIBROM BELAI, Appellant
V. CLIFF’ S CHECK CASHING, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. CC
- 14
- 04339
- B 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s March 16, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a brief.
We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellant on January 29, 2015 filed as of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
§ 191.133 Explanation of terms. ( a ) *Materials.* Section 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), applies only to materials used in the original construction and equipment of vessels and aircraft, or to materials used in a “major conversion”, as defined in this section, of a vessel or aircraft. Section 313(g) does not apply to materials used for alteration or repair, or to materials not required for safe operation of the vessel or aircraft.
( b ) *Foreign account and ownership.* Foreign account and ownership, as used in § 313(g) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1313(g)), means only vessels or aircraft built or equipped for the account of an owner or owners residing in a foreign country and having a bona fide intention that the vessel or aircraft, when completed, shall be owned and operated under the flag of a foreign country.
( c ) *Major conversion.* For purposes of this subpart, a “major conversion” means a conversion that substantially changes the dimensions or carrying capacity of the vessel or aircraft, changes the type of the vessel or aircraft, substantially prolongs the life of the vessel or aircraft, or otherwise so changes the vessel or aircraft that it is essentially a new vessel or aircraft, as determined by Customs (see 46 U.S.C. 2101(14a)).
§ 2472.4 Content of request. ( a ) A request from a party or parties to the Panel for consideration of an impasse arising from an agency determination not to establish or to terminate a flexible or compressed work schedule under section 6131 (c)(2) or (c)(3) of the Act must be in writing and shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Identification of the parties and individuals authorized to act on their behalf, including their addresses, telephone numbers, and facsimile numbers;
( 2 ) Description of the bargaining unit involved in the dispute and the date recognition was accorded to the exclusive representative;
( 3 ) Number, length, and dates of negotiation sessions held;
( 4 ) A copy of any collective bargaining agreement between the parties and any other agreements concerning flexible and compressed work schedules;
( 5 ) A copy of the schedule or proposed schedule, if any, which is the subject of the agency's determination;
( 6 ) A copy of the agency's written determination and the finding on which the determination is based, including, in a case where the finding is made by a duly authorized delegatee, evidence of a specific delegation of authority to make such a finding; and
( 7 ) A summary of the position of the initiating party or parties with respect to the agency's determination.
[48 FR 19695, May 2, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 41295, Aug. 8, 1996]
#### § 2423.5 [Reserved]
J~"IEO ST,qT,S 

r UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

y ~l~ft► z 

F~ 0 lqC PROS~G~~ 

APR 1 1 21111 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

J. R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Prograni 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

This is in response to your Apri18, 2011, request for the Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence with the Department of Energy's (DOE) draft amended 

certification letter to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterizing transuranic 

(TRU) waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Your request is in accordance with the Carlsbad 

Field Office (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot 

Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste 

characterization activities at DOE TRU waste generator sites. We concur that DOE's latest draft 

amended certification letter comports with all of EPA's existing approvals for CH TRU waste 

(debris, soils, and solids) and RH TRU waste (debris and solids) at SRS. 

The purpose of this amended certification is to correctly identify the certified container 

sizes for which Real-Time Radiography and Nondestructive Assay units are certified to 

characterize. EPA has also received and reviewed quarterly tiering reports covering Tier 2 

changes to the waste characterization program implemented by CCP at SRS and have found all 

changes made to be acceptable. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft amended certii -ication 

memo for SRS-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

~~~,Dlt ,~ ) 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 0 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO NTP 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA 

Raymond Lee, EPA
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1378

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to increase payments 

to States for expenditures for short term training of staff of certain 

child welfare agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2003

Mr. WELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act 

to increase payments to States for expenditures for short 

term training of staff of certain child welfare agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN PAYMENTS TO STATES FOR EX4 PENDITURES FOR SHORT TERM TRAINING OF 

5 STAFF OF CERTAIN CHILD WELFARE AGEN6 CIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 474(a)(3)(B) of the So8 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 674(a)(3)(B)) is amended by 

9 inserting ‘‘, or State-licensed or State-approved child wel-
2

•HR 1378 IH 

1 fare agencies providing services,’’ after ‘‘child care institu2 tions’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) shall take effect on the 1st day of the 

6 1st calendar quarter that begins on or after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act, without regard to 

8 whether regulations to implement the amendment 

9 are promulgated by such date. 

10 (2) DELAY PERMITTED IF STATE LEGISLATION

11 REQUIRED.—In the case of a State plan approved 

12 under section 454 of the Social Security Act which 

13 requires State legislation (other than legislation ap14 propriating funds) in order for the plan to meet the 

15 additional requirements imposed by the amendment 

16 made by subsection (a) of this section, the State 

17 plan shall not be regarded as failing to comply with 

18 the additional requirements solely on the basis of the 

19 failure of the plan to meet the additional require20 ments before the first day of the first calendar quar21 ter beginning after the close of the first regular ses22 sion of the State legislature that begins after the 

23 date of the enactment of this Act. For purposes of 

24 the previous sentence, in the case of a State that has 

25 a 2-year legislative session, each year of such session 
3

•HR 1378 IH 

1 shall be deemed to be a separate regular session of 

2 the State legislature.

Æ
§ 351.703 Exception to qualifications. An agency may assign an employee to a vacant position under § 351.201(b) or § 351.701 of this part without regard to OPM's standards and requirements for the position if: ( a ) The employee meets any minimum education requirement for the position; and
( b ) The agency determines that the employee has the capacity, adaptability, and special skills needed to satisfactorily perform the duties and responsibilities of the position.
[56 FR 65417, Dec. 17, 1991]
Exhibit 11
 AmSurg Corp.
Earnings Per Share
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
  Three Months Ended June 30,
    
    Six Months Ended June 30,Per
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    PerEarnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share
    
    Earnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share(Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    Amount
    
    (Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    Amount2009:Net earnings from
continuing
operations
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(basic)
    
    $
    13,798
    
    
    
    30,660
    
    
    $
    0.45
    
    
    $
    26,411
    
    
    
    30,952
    
    
    $
    0.85Effect of
dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    168
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    165Net earnings from
continuing
operations
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    13,798
    
    
    
    30,828
    
    
    $
    0.45
    
    
    $
    26,411
    
    
    
    31,117
    
    
    $
    0.85Net earnings
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(basic)
    
    $
    13,580
    
    
    
    30,660
    
    
    $
    0.44
    
    
    $
    26,196
    
    
    
    30,952
    
    
    $
    0.85Effect of
dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    168
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    165Net earnings
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    13,580
    
    
    
    30,828
    
    
    $
    0.44
    
    
    $
    26,196
    
    
    
    31,117
    
    
    $
    0.842008:Net earnings from
continuing
operations
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(basic)
    
    $
    12,444
    
    
    
    31,479
    
    
    $
    0.40
    
    
    $
    24,066
    
    
    
    31,388
    
    
    $
    0.77Effect of
dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    483
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    488Net earnings from
continuing
operations
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    12,444
    
    
    
    31,962
    
    
    $
    0.39
    
    
    $
    24,066
    
    
    
    31,876
    
    
    $
    0.75Net earnings
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(basic)
    
    $
    11,244
    
    
    
    31,479
    
    
    $
    0.36
    
    
    $
    22,950
    
    
    
    31,388
    
    
    $
    0.73Effect of
dilutive securities options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    483
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    488Net earnings
attributable to
AmSurg Corp. per
common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    11,244
    
    
    
    31,962
    
    
    $
    0.35
    
    
    $
    22,950
    
    
    
    31,876
    
    
    $
    0.72