alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 536.102 Coverage. ( a ) Subject to the exclusions in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, this part covers any employee who, at the time this part is applied— ( 1 ) Is in a covered pay system; or
( 2 ) Is moving to a position under a covered pay system from a position not under a covered pay system, as long as the individual was an *employee* as defined in 5 CFR 536.103 while serving in the position in a noncovered pay system.
( b ) An agency may not provide grade or pay retention under this part to an employee who— ( 1 ) Is reduced in grade or pay for personal cause or at the employee's request;
( 2 ) Was employed on a temporary or term basis immediately before the action causing the reduction in grade or pay;
( 3 ) Does not satisfactorily complete the probationary period prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3321(a)(2), and, as a result, is removed from a supervisory or managerial position;
( 4 ) Is entitled to receive a saved rate of basic pay under 5 U.S.C. 3594(c) and 5 CFR 359.705 because of removal from the Senior Executive Service and placement in a civil service position (other than a Senior Executive Service position) under 5 U.S.C. 3594(b)(2);
( 5 ) Moves from an Executive Schedule position paid under 5 U.S.C. chapter 53, subchapter II, or a position whose rate of pay is fixed by law at a rate equal to a rate for the Executive Schedule;
( 6 ) Moves between positions not under a covered pay system or from a position under a covered pay system to a position not under a covered pay system;
( 7 ) Moves to a nonappropriated fund position as described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c) (except a position occupied by a prevailing rate employee);
( 8 ) Moves from a nonappropriated fund position as described in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c) (except a position occupied by a prevailing rate employee) to a position in a covered pay system, unless covered by § 536.302(a); or
( 9 ) Is reduced in pay upon termination of a critical position pay authority under 5 CFR part 535.
( c ) An agency may not provide grade or pay retention under this part based on the grade or rate of basic pay held by the employee during a temporary promotion or temporary reassignment. However, a temporary promotion or temporary reassignment does not affect an employee's preexisting entitlement to grade or pay retention.
( d ) An agency may not provide grade retention under subpart B of this part to an employee who moves from a position not under a covered pay system to a position under a covered pay system.
( e ) An employee loses eligibility for or entitlement to grade or pay retention under the conditions specified in §§ 536.207, 536.208, and 536.308.
[70 FR 31305, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 50183, Aug. 26, 2008]
§ 536.104 Reasonable offer. ( a ) For the purpose of determining whether grade retention eligibility or entitlement must be terminated under § 536.207 or 536.208, the offer of a position is a reasonable offer if the position's grade is equal to or higher than the retained grade and if all the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section are met. If the offered position is in a different pay system, § 536.105 must be applied to determine whether the grade of the offered position is equal to or greater than the retained grade.
( b ) For the purpose of determining whether pay retention eligibility or entitlement must be terminated under § 536.308, the offer of a position is a reasonable offer if the employee's rate of basic pay in the position would be equal to or greater than the rate to which the employee is or would be entitled under the pay retention provisions and if all the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section are met.
( c ) An offer of a position must meet the following additional conditions to qualify as a reasonable offer: ( 1 ) The offer must be in writing and must include an official position description of the offered position;
( 2 ) The offer must inform the employee that entitlement to grade or pay retention will terminate if the offer is declined and that the employee may appeal the reasonableness of the offer as provided in § 536.402;
( 3 ) The offered position must be of equal or greater tenure than the employee's position before the action resulting in the grade or pay retention entitlement;
( 4 ) The offered position must be full-time, unless the employee's position immediately before the action resulting in entitlement to grade or pay retention was less than full-time, in which case the offered position must have a work schedule providing for no fewer hours of work per week or per pay period than the position held before the action; and
( 5 ) The offered position must be in the same commuting area as the employee's position immediately before the offer, unless the employee is subject to a mobility agreement or a published agency policy that requires employee mobility.
Rockingham,

Dec., 1898.

#### Fellows *& a. v.*Ripley *& a.*

The legal estate in land in which a use is created vests by the statute of uses in the *cestui que use,*and his deed transfers the title.

Bill in Equity, to remove a cloud from the title to certain real estate which the plaintiffs claim to own. Facts found by a referee.

*Burnham, Brown £ Warren,*for the plaintiffs.

*&■ K. B. 1. Bartlett*and *Edwin Gr. Eastman,*for the defendants.

Wallace, J.

Richard Fellows negotiated the purchase of the land, paid the consideration, and took the deed in his wife’s name, under circumstances which show it was not a gift to or settlement upon her, but created a use in his favor. The plaintiffs claim title to the premises as the heirs of the wife, and the defendants under a-deed of Richard to them.

Under the statute of uses (27 Hen. VHI, *c.*10), which is in force in this state, Richard, who was the *cestui que use,*became the legal owner of the land. The statute of uses executes the use, and vests the legal estate in the *cestui que use. Hutchins*v. *Heywood,*50 N. H. 491. Richard’s title passed by his deed to the defendants. *Osgood*v. *Eaton,*62 N. H. 512.

*Decree for the defendants.*

Young, J., did.not sit: the others concurred.
§ 576.101 Definitions. In this part: *Employee* , as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3521, means an employee as defined under 5 U.S.C. 2105 employed by an agency and an individual employed by a county committee established under section 8(b)(5) of the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act (16 U.S.C. 590h(b)(5)) who— ( 1 ) Is serving under an appointment without time limitation; and
( 2 ) Has been currently employed for a continuous period of at least 3 years.
*Specific designee* means a senior officer or official within an agency who has been specifically designated to sign requests for authority to offer Voluntary Separation Incentive Payments for, or in place of, the head of the agency. Examples include the Chief Human Capital Officer, the Assistant Secretary for Administration, the Director of Human Resources Management, or a deputy of one of these persons.
# L_2016093EN.01003801.xml

| 7.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 24/2015

of 25 February 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/512]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1062/2013 of 30 October 2013 on the format of the European Technical Assessment for construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1062/2013 of 30 October 2013 on the format of the European Technical Assessment for construction products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 2p (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 157/2014) of Chapter XXI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘2q. | 32013 R 1062: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1062/2013 of 30 October 2013 on the format of the European Technical Assessment for construction products (OJ L 289, 31.10.2013, p. 42).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘2q.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1062/2013 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 February 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 289, 31.10.2013, p. 42.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 2638.101 Mission. ( a ) *Mission.* The primary mission of the executive branch ethics program is to prevent conflicts of interest on the part of executive branch employees.
( b ) *Breadth.* The executive branch ethics program works to ensure that public servants make impartial decisions based on the interests of the public when carrying out the governmental responsibilities entrusted to them, serve as good stewards of public resources, and loyally adhere to the Constitution and laws of the United States. In the broadest sense of the term, “conflicts of interest” stem from financial interests; business or personal relationships; misuses of official position, official time, or public resources; and the receipt of gifts. The mission is focused on both conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts of interest.
( c ) *Conflicts-based program.* The executive branch ethics program is a conflicts-based program, rather than a solely disclosure-based program. While transparency is an invaluable tool for promoting and monitoring ethical conduct, the executive branch ethics program requires more than transparency. This program seeks to ensure the integrity of governmental decision making and to promote public confidence by preventing conflicts of interest. Taken together, the systems in place to identify and address conflicts of interest establish a foundation on which to build and sustain an ethical culture in the executive branch.
EX-4(e)

                                   ENDORSEMENT

1.    The last  sentence  of the  first  paragraph  under  Section  16  entitled
      "INITIAL PURCHASE PAYMENT" is deleted and replaced with the following:

      THE  SINGLE  PURCHASE  PAYMENT  IS DUE ON THE DATE OF ISSUE.  THE  MINIMUM
      SINGLE PURCHASE PAYMENT WHICH MAY BE MADE IS [$5,000].

2.    The last sentence of the first  paragraph under Section 35 entitled "DEATH
      OF ANNUITANT" is deleted and replaced with the following:

      THE DEATH BENEFIT WILL BE THE GREATEST OF THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS:

      (A)   THE  ACCUMULATED  VALUE ON THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF DUE PROOF OF DEATH
            AT THE COMPANY'S HOME OFFICE;

      (B)   THE  ACCUMULATED  VALUE  ON  THE  SPECIFIED   CONTRACT   ANNIVERSARY
            IMMEDIATELY  PRECEDING  THE DATE OF DEATH,  INCREASED  BY THE DOLLAR
            AMOUNT OF SUBSEQUENT PURCHASE PAYMENTS AND REDUCED PROPORTIONALLY BY
            THE PERCENTAGE  REDUCTION IN ACCUMULATED VALUE  ATTRIBUTABLE TO EACH
            SUBSEQUENT  PARTIAL  WITHDRAWALS  SINCE  THE  IMMEDIATELY  PRECEDING
            SPECIFIED CONTRACT ANNIVERSARY; OR

      (C)   100% OF ALL  PURCHASE  PAYMENTS  MADE  UNDER  THE  CONTRACT  REDUCED
            PROPORTIONALLY BY THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF ANY PARTIAL WITHDRAWALS SINCE
            THE DATE OF ISSUE.

3.    The last  sentence of Section 36 entitled  "DEATH OF OWNER" is deleted and
      replaced with the following:

      IN THE EVENT OF THE DEATH OF THE OWNER, THE ACCUMULATED  VALUE ON THE DATE
      OF RECEIPT OF DUE PROOF OF DEATH AT THE COMPANY'S HOME OFFICE WILL BE PAID
      TO THE BENEFICIARY(IES).  IF THERE ARE JOINT OWNERS, THE ACCUMULATED VALUE
      WILL BE PAID WHEN THE FIRST  OWNER DIES.  UPON THE DEATH OF EITHER  OWNER,
      THE  SURVIVING  JOINT  OWNER WILL BE THE  PRIMARY  BENEFICIARY.  ANY OTHER
      BENEFICIARY DESIGNATED WILL BE TREATED AS A CONTINGENT BENEFICIARY, UNLESS
      THE COMPANY IS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE.

                                          First Investors Life Insurance Company

                                          Carol Springsteen

END-VAC (CDSC)
### §60p. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60p was editorially reclassified as section 4595 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                           CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements of Tag-It Pacific, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-109854, 333-98577,
333-66356,  333-44592,  333-84099, 333-50267) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-106494
and  333-111612)  of our  report  dated  March  8,  2004  on our  audits  of the
consolidated balance sheets of Tag-It Pacific,  Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and
2002,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,  stockholders'
equity and convertible redeemable preferred stock and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2003,  which report is incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                             /s/BDO Seidman, LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 26, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1653 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1653

To amend title 10, United States Code, to change the effective date for 
paid-up coverage under the military Survivor Benefit Plan from October 
                      1, 2008, to October 1, 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2003

Mr. Saxton (for himself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Foley, Mr. Wilson 
   of South Carolina, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Bartlett of 
  Maryland, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Filner, Mr. 
LoBiondo, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Lucas of Kentucky, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. 
 Hefley, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Turner of Texas, Mr. Andrews, 
 Mr. Simpson, and Mr. Goode) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to change the effective date for 
paid-up coverage under the military Survivor Benefit Plan from October 
                      1, 2008, to October 1, 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PAID-UP COVERAGE UNDER SURVIVOR BENEFIT 
              PLAN.

     Section 1452(j) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``October 1, 2008'' and inserting ``October 1, 2003''.
                                 <all>
```
### §§91, 92. Repealed. Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §5, 65 Stat. 407

Section 91, acts Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 325; June 10, 1896, ch. 401, §1, 29 Stat. 381, related to sound signals for fog.

Section 92, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 325, related to speed in fog.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1954, see note set out under sections 61 to 63 of this title.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of D. J. B., D. G., D. G., D. G. and D. L. v. Department 

of Family and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-16-00989-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-26726

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

This is an accelerated appeal from a parental termination order. Our deadline for 

disposing of termination cases is 180 days after the notice of appeal is filed. See Tex. R. Jud. 

Admin. 6.2(a), reprinted in TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. Ann, tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West 2013). 

Therefore, it is imperative that records are timely filed.

The deadline for filing the reporter’s record was December 27, 2016. On December 29, 

2016, an order issued advising that the record was overdue and ordering the reporter’s record to 

be filed within 10 days. On January 9, 2017, court reporter Delores Johnson filed volumes 3 and 

5 of the reporter’s record. Johnson also advised of two other court reporters who were involved 

in the case. One of those reporters, Walter Johnson, filed a notice on January 11 that he was not 

involved. He stated that the two reporters were Delores Johnson and Angelia Singleton. The 

other court reporter, Angelia Singleton, has not responded to our December 29 order.

Accordingly, we order court reporter Angelia Singleton to file the remaining volumes of 

reporter’s record on or before January 27, 2017.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 12, 2017
(July 9, 1953.)

#### City of Buffalo, Respondent, v. Hanna Furnace Corporation et al., Appellants.

Upon remission from the Court of Appeals (305 N. Y. 369), order of this court and of the Supreme Court reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur. Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ. [280 App. Div. 623.]
Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Oromin Explorations Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that: 1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 5, 2010 (signed): Chet Idziszek Chet Idziszek
President and Chief Executive Officer


---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 20, 2011

h0713 

# Order

July 20, 2011

142794

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142794 COA: 301913 KWAN VOLIARE WARE, Be rrien CC: 2009-016978-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 10, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Vernon Park Realty, Inc., Respondent, v. City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 890.]
§ 582.304 Nonliability for disclosure. ( a ) No agency employee whose duties include responding to interrogatories pursuant to § 582.303(b), shall be subject to any disciplinary action or civil or criminal liability or penalty for any disclosure of information made in connection with the carrying out of any duties pertaining directly or indirectly to answering such interrogatories.
( b ) However, an agency would not be precluded from taking disciplinary action against an employee who consistently or purposely failed to provide correct information requested by interrogatories.
#### James W. Adams, Plaintiff, v. Edwin H. Stewart and Others, Respondents, Impleaded with Elizabeth S. Turner, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
# L_2014259EN.01000102.xml

| 30.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/1

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part

The Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, signed in Brussels on 27 June 2014, will be provisionally applied, by virtue of Article 3(1) of the Council Decision on the signing and provisional application of the Agreement (1), as of 1 September 2014.

1

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/492/EU of 16 June 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part (OJ L 260, 30.8.2014, p. 1).

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marcellus Reid, Respondent, against Philip Rose, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion for reargument, or in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ. [See 281 App. Div. 1062.]