alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2240. Emergency response services

#### (a) Grants

The Secretary is authorized to make grants to any non-Federal interest operating a project for a harbor for provision of emergency response services in such harbor (including contingency planning, necessary personnel training, and the procurement of equipment and facilities either by the non-Federal interest, by a local agency or municipality, or by a combination of local agencies or municipalities on a cost-reimbursable basis, either by a cooperative agreement, mutual aid plan, or mutual assistance plan entered into between one or more non-Federal interests, public agencies, or local municipalities).

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1986, and ending before October 1, 1992, $5,000,000.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title II, §212, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4107.)
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1917 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1917

     To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize military 
 recreational facilities to be used by any veteran with a compensable 
                     service-connected disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2003

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize military 
 recreational facilities to be used by any veteran with a compensable 
                     service-connected disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF MILITARY RECREATIONAL FACILITIES BY VETERANS WITH 
              COMPENSABLE SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 54 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 1066. Morale, welfare, and recreation facilities: use by 
              veterans with compensable service-connected disabilities
    ``(a) Disabled Veterans.--A person who is a veteran with a 
compensable service-connected disability (as determined by the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs) shall be permitted to use MWR recreation 
facilities on the same basis as members entitled to retired pay.
    ``(b) Dependents.--Dependents of a person who is permitted under 
subsection (a) to use MWR recreation facilities shall be permitted to 
use such facilities on the same basis as dependents of members entitled 
to retired pay.
    ``(c) MWR Recreation Facilities Defined.--In this section, the term 
`MWR recreation facilities' means recreation facilities operated by 
nonappropriated fund activities of the Department of Defense for the 
morale, welfare, and recreation of members of the armed forces. Such 
term does not include exchange stores and other revenue-generating 
facilities operated by those activities.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``1066. Morale, welfare, and recreation retail facilities: use by 
                            veterans with compensable service-connected 
                            disabilities.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 1066 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 180-day 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Further Explanation regarding Slot Summary Reports for Docket Number 

FAA-2014-1073:

In response to requests received for information related to the notice of proposed rulemaking 

entitled “Slot Management and Transparency for LaGuardia Airport, John F. Kennedy 

International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport”,

1 the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) posted a number of slot reports providing summaries of slot holder and 

operator information during particular periods at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), 

LaGuardia Airport (LGA), and Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR).

2

This document provides an explanation regarding some of the information posted, and corrects

an error regarding the 01 July 2012 operator summary report file for LGA.

1. Slot Summary Reports were previously posted with Holder and Operator information for 

January and July 2009-2012 for JFK (Docket No. FAA-2014-1073-0026), LGA (Docket 

No. FAA-2014-1073-0027) and EWR (Docket No. FAA-2014-1073-0029.) These reports 

include information on slots held or operated at least 5 days per week beginning with the 

status date. The status date reflects FAA confirmed slot transactions as of that date. The 

reports for LGA exclude Saturdays and before 1200 local time on Sundays as those 

periods are not slot controlled. 

2. The January 2009 summary reports for JFK include slot holdings by the larger domestic 

carriers held five days per week or more. Records are not available in the FAA Slot 

Management System for that period. The reports include domestic and foreign air carrier 

information beginning with the summer 2009 season.

3. There may be differences between holder and operator summary totals as some slots are 

not transferred five or more days per week and would not be included in these reports. 

Some slots are allocated to a carrier for less than five days per week. Additionally, in 

some cases the reports do not reflect all transfers between mainline carriers marketing 

flights and the operating regional carriers. These slots would be reflected primarily as the 

mainline rather than the regional carrier.

4. A LGA Slot Summary Operator report for 01 July 2012 has been placed in Docket No. 

FAA-2014-1073-0027. The report is titled “corrected LGA OPER 01JUL12” and 

replaces a report for an incorrect date.

 1 80 FR 1273, January 8, 2015.

2 80 FR 12355, March 9, 2015.
§ 3201.109 Provisions of 5 CFR part 2635 not applicable to Corporation employees. The following provisions of 5 CFR part 2635 are not applicable to employees of the Corporation: ( a ) Because of the restrictions imposed by 18 U.S.C. 213 on examiners accepting loans or gratuities, an examiner in the Division of Supervision and Consumer Protection may not use any of the gift exceptions at 5 CFR 2635.204 to accept a gift from an FDIC-insured depository institution examined by him or her or from any person connected with such institution.
( b ) Provisions of 41 U.S.C. 423 (Procurement integrity) and the implementing regulations at 48 CFR 3.104 (of the Federal Acquisition Regulation) applicable to procurement officials referred to in: ( 1 ) 5 CFR 2635.202(c)(4)(iii);
( 2 ) The note following 5 CFR 2635.203(b)(7);
( 3 ) Example 5 following 5 CFR 2635.204(a);
( 4 ) Examples 2 and 3 following 5 CFR 2635.703(b)(3);
( 5 ) 5 CFR 2635.902(f), (h), (l), and (bb);
( c ) Provisions of 31 U.S.C. 1353 (Acceptance of travel and related expenses from non-Federal sources) and the implementing regulations at 41 CFR part 304-1 (Acceptance of payment from a non-Federal source for travel expenses) referred to in 5 CFR 2635.203(b)(8)(i).
( d ) Provisions of 41 CFR Chapter 101 (Federal Property Management Regulations) referred to in 5 CFR 2635.205(a)(4).
( e ) Provisions of 41 CFR Chapter 201 (Federal Information Resources Management Regulation) referred to in Example 1 following 5 CFR 2635.704(b)(2).
[60 FR 20174, Apr. 25, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 71070, Nov. 29, 2002]
#### Corby Commission Company, Appellant, v. John Gilliam, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
December 5, 2013



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ORLANDO SALINAS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00378

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below.

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be

certified below for observa nce.
§ 610.122 Variations in work schedules for educational purposes. ( a ) Notwithstanding § 610.121, the head of an agency may authorize a special tour of duty of not less than 40 hours to permit an employee to take one or more courses in a college, university, or other educational institution when it is determined that: ( 1 ) The courses being taken are not training under chapter 41 of title 5, United States Code;
( 2 ) The rearrangement of the employee's tour of duty will not appreciably interfere with the accomplishment of the work required to be performed;
( 3 ) Additional costs for personal services will not be incurred; and
( 4 ) Completion of the courses will equip the employee for more effective work in the agency.
( b ) The agency may not pay to the employee any premium pay solely because the special tour of duty authorized under this section causes the employee to work on a day, or at a time during the day, for which premium pay would otherwise be payable.
( c ) OPM may from time to time request an agency to report on the use of this authority.
---

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION  1.
     I have reviewed the annual report on Form 20-F of Oromin Explorations Ltd. (the Company);2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the Company and have:a)
     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
     designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
     evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
     disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and5.
     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)
     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: July 5, 2010 (signed)Ian BrownIan Brown, Chief Financial Officer


---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1817

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a dredging project 

to increase the depth of Menominee Harbor, Menomiee River, Michigan 

and Wisconsin, from 24 feet to 26 feet. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a 

dredging project to increase the depth of Menominee 

Harbor, Menomiee River, Michigan and Wisconsin, from 

24 feet to 26 feet.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and 

4 River, Michigan and Wisconsin, authorized by section 101 

5 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) and 

6 deauthorized on April 15, 2002, in accordance with section 

7 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
2

•HR 1817 IH 

1 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2); 100 Stat. 4201), may be car2 ried out by the Secretary of the Army.

Æ
§ 630.1207 Notice of leave. ( a ) If leave taken under § 630.1203(a) of this part is foreseeable based on an expected birth, placement for adoption or foster care, or planned medical treatment, the employee shall provide notice to the agency of his or her intention to take leave not less than 30 calendar days before the date the leave is to begin. If the date of birth or placement or planned medical treatment requires leave to begin within 30 calendar days, the employee shall provide such notice as is practicable.
( b ) If leave taken under § 630.1203(a) (3) or (4) of this part is foreseeable based on planned medical treatment, the employee shall consult with the agency and make a reasonable effort to schedule medical treatment so as not to disrupt unduly the operations of the agency, subject to the approval of the health care provider. The agency may, for justifiable cause, request that an employee reschedule medical treatment, subject to the approval of the health care provider.
( c ) If the need for leave taken under § 630.1203(a)(5) is foreseeable, the employee must provide notice as soon as practicable, regardless of how far in advance the leave is being requested.
( d ) If the need for leave is not foreseeable—e.g., a medical emergency or the unexpected availability of a child for adoption or foster care, and the employee cannot provide 30 calendar days' notice of his or her need for leave, the employee shall provide notice within a reasonable period of time appropriate to the circumstances involved. If necessary, notice may be given by an employee's personal representative (e.g., a family member or other responsible party). If the need for leave is not foreseeable and the employee is unable, due to circumstances beyond his or her control, to provide notice of his or her need for leave, the leave may not be delayed or denied.
( e ) If the need for leave is foreseeable, and the employee fails to give 30 calendar days' notice with no reasonable excuse for the delay of notification, the agency may delay the taking of leave under § 630.1203(a) of this part until at least 30 calendar days after the date the employee provides notice of his or her need for family and medical leave.
( f ) An agency may waive the notice requirements under paragraph (a) of this section and instead impose the agency's usual and customary policies or procedures for providing notification of leave. The agency's policies or procedures for providing notification of leave must not be more stringent than the requirements in this section. However, an agency may not deny an employee's entitlement to leave under § 630.1203(a) of this part if the employee fails to follow such agency policies or procedures.
( g ) An agency may require that a request for leave under § 630.1203(a) (1) and (2) be supported by evidence that is administratively acceptable to the agency.
[58 FR 39602, July 23, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 62274, Dec. 2, 1994; 61 FR 64453, Dec. 5, 1996; 65 FR 26487, May 8, 2000. Redesignated and amended at 76 FR 60704, 60705, Sept. 30, 2011]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Henry M. Fishman, Respondent, against Lafayette Radio Corp. et al, Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*877Present — Poster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Santry and Bergan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 973.]
<Page>

Exhibit 32.1            Section 906 Certification of CEO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill Moses, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


BY:  /s/ Merrill Moses
     -----------------
     Merrill Moses
     President and CEO
     May 21, 2007
EX-10.4

Amendment to Original Agreement

November 18, 2003

Datameg Corp. agrees to the following amended compensation articles relating to
the Agreement signed between the parties on August 1, 2003.

1. Datameg Corp. will issue, per every $ 250,000 raised by AMT Management;
500,000 shares DTMG Common Stock to AMT.  This condition may be exercised for
all funds raised by AMT prior to January 1, 2004, up to $ 1,000,000.00.

2. Datameg Corp. will issue an additional 1,000,000 shares to AMT should
they raise the entire $1,000,000.00 prior to December 10, 2003.

Signed:

/s/ Andrew Benson
----------------
Andrew Benson

Datameg Corp.

/s/ Michael Mitsunaga
---------------------
Michael Mitsunaga

AMT Management
###### Editorial Note on Part 315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

#### § 315.501 Transfer.

Subject to part 335 of this chapter, an agency may appoint by transfer to a competitive service position, without a break in service of a single workday, a current career or career-conditional employee of another agency.

[60 FR 53504, Oct. 16, 1995]
§ 575.304 Ineligible categories of employees. An agency may not pay a retention incentive to an employee in— ( a ) A position to which an individual is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate;
( b ) A position in the Senior Executive Service as a noncareer appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(7));
( c ) A position excepted from the competitive service by reason of its confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character; or
( d ) A position not otherwise covered by the exclusions in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section— ( 1 ) To which an individual is appointed by the President without the advice and consent of the Senate, except a Senior Executive Service position in which the individual serves as a career appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(4));
( 2 ) Designated as the head of an agency, including an agency headed by a collegial body composed of two or more individual members;
( 3 ) In which the employee is expected to receive an appointment as the head of an agency; or
( 4 ) To which an individual is appointed as a Senior Executive Service limited term appointee or limited emergency appointee (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 3132(a)(5) and (a)(6), respectively) when the appointment must be cleared through the White House Office of Presidential Personnel.
[70 FR 25747, May 13, 2005, as amended at 78 FR 49364, Aug. 14, 2013]
December 23, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CORDARRELL CHARLES C ARROLL , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00735

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

___ _____________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order th is decision certified below for observance.
§ 2606.302 OGE or other agency action on requests. ( a ) *Time limit for acknowledging a request for amendment.* To the extent possible, OGE or the other agency concerned will acknowledge receipt of a request to amend a record or records within 10 working days.
( b ) *Initial determination on an amendment request.* The decision of OGE or the other agency in response to a request for amendment of a record in a system of records may grant in whole, or deny any part of the request to amend the record(s). ( 1 ) If OGE or the other agency concerned grants the request, the appropriate system manager will amend the record(s) and provide a copy of the amended record(s) to the data subject. Where an accounting of disclosure has been maintained, the system manager shall advise all previous recipients of the record that an amendment has been made and give the substance of the amendment. Where practicable, the system manager shall send a copy of the amended record to previous recipients.
( 2 ) If OGE or the other agency concerned denies the request in whole or in part, the reasons for the denial will be stated in the response letter. In addition, the response letter will state: ( i ) The name and address of the official with whom an appeal of the denial may be lodged; and
( ii ) A description of any other procedures which may be required of the data subject in order to process the appeal.
Cite as 2016 Ark. 191



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-16-301 STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PETITIONER V. TERESA LYNETTE BLOODMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, ABN 2005055 RESPONDENT Opinion Delivered April 28, 2016

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE

SPECIAL JUDGE APPOINTED.

PER CURIAM Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, has filed a petition for disbarment against the respondent, Teresa Lynette Bloodman. Pursuant to section 13(A) of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law, a special judge shall be appointed to preside over the disbarment proceedings in the instant case. After hearing all the evidence relevant to the alleged misconduct, the judge shall make findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of an appropriate sanction, and shall file them, along with a transcript and the record of the proceedings, with the clerk of the supreme court. We hereby appoint the Honorable Kim Smith as a special judge to hear this matter and to provide the court with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of anCite as 2016 Ark. 191

appropriate sanction. Upon receipt of the special judge’s findings, we will render a decision in this matter. It is so ordered. W OOD , J., not participating.

2