U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5131

Prepared in cooperation with the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma

Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant 

Contamination at an Abandoned Oilfield-Service Site near 

Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006
Cover photograph shows the threading barn taken in June 2004 by the Absentee Shawnee Tribe, Office of 

Environmental Protection. Photograph was reproduced with permission of the Absentee Shawnee Tribe.
Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, 

and Plant Contamination at an Abandoned 

Oilfield-Service Site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma, 2005–2006

By Shana L. Mashburn and S. Jerrod Smith

Prepared in cooperation with the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma

Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5131

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Department of the Interior

DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary

U.S. Geological Survey

Mark D. Myers, Director

U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007

For product and ordering information:

World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod

Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS

For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, 

natural hazards, and the environment:

World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov

Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the 

U.S. Government.

Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to 

reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.

Suggested citation:

Mashburn, S.L., and Smith, S.J., 2007, Reconnaissance of soil, ground water, and plant contamination at an abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations 

Report 2007-5131, 91 p.
iii

Contents

Abstract...........................................................................................................................................................1

Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1

Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................1

Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................................2

Acknowledgments................................................................................................................................2

Data Collection and Analysis.......................................................................................................................2

Field Procedures...................................................................................................................................2

Data Analysis.......................................................................................................................................11

Soil Characteristics .....................................................................................................................................12

Physical Properties.............................................................................................................................12

Chemical Analysis...............................................................................................................................12

Ground-Water Chemical Analysis.............................................................................................................23

Plant Chemical Analysis and Relation to Trace elements in Soils and Ground Water ....................23

Areas of Contamination ..............................................................................................................................25

Summary........................................................................................................................................................25

Selected References...................................................................................................................................26

Appendixes ...................................................................................................................................................29

Appendix 1. Quality control data ......................................................................................................31

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma 2005-2006..............................................................................................................47

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma 2005-2006..............................................................................................................68

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma 2005-2006..............................................................................................................80

Figures

1. Map showing location of study area near Shawnee, Oklahoma .........................................3

2. Aerial photograph showing abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma, 2005–2006 ...................................................................................................................4

3. Photographs showing buildings and debris on abandoned oifield-service site near 

Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 ................................................................................................5

4–5. Aerial photographs showing:

 4. Locations of soil coring sites and installed wells (including existing supply well 

labeled Old Well) near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 .......................................................7

 5. Locations of transects for initial plant survey and plant sampling sites near 

Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 ................................................................................................8

6. Diagram showing approximate range in soil textures found in the A, B, and C 

horizons of soil cores collected from abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma, 2005–2006 .................................................................................................................13

7. Descriptive log of soil textures found in soil core SS4 representative of well 1 near 

Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 ..............................................................................................14
iv

8. Descriptive log of soil textures found in soil core SS1 representative of wells 2 

and 5 near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006. ........................................................................15

9. Descriptive log of soil textures found in soil core SS7 representative of wells 3 

and 4 near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006. .........................................................................16

10. Aerial photograph showing total trace-element and semivolatile organic compound 

concentrations in soil samples near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006. ............................17

11. Boxplots showing trace-element concentrations in soil from abandoned oilfieldservice site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 and soil and bedrock samples 

collected from Central Oklahoma aquifer in Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, 1991.....18

12–13. Aerial photographs showing:

 12. Trace elements and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) in ground-water 

samples near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.....................................................................22

 13. Total trace-element concentrations in plant samples near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 

2005–2006 .....................................................................................................................................24

Tables

1. Percent coverages of plants in Open Grassland Zones and Dense Covered Zones 

at the abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005. ............................9

2. Summary table for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Human Health 

Medium-Specific screening level exceedances...................................................................19

3. Ground-water levels measured in wells near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005-2006..............20

4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma 2005-2006...................................................................................................................32

5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near 

Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006. ..............................................................................................38

6. Quality-control plant samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma 2005-2006...................................................................................................................44
v

Conversion Factors

Multiply By To obtain

Length

inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter (cm)

foot (ft) 0.3048 meter (m)

mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer (km)

Area

acre 4,047 square meter (m2)

Multiply By To obtain

Length

millimeter (mm) 0.03937 inch (in.)

meter (m) 3.281 foot (ft) 

meter (m) 1.094 yard (yd) 

Mass

milligram (mg) 0.00003527 ounce (oz)

kilogram (kg) 2.205 pound (lb)

Temperature in degrees Celsius (°C) may be converted to degrees Fahrenheit (°F) as follows:

°F=(1.8×°C)+32

Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) may be converted to degrees Celsius (°C) as follows:

°C=(°F-32)/1.8

Vertical coordinate information is referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 

(NAVD 88).

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).

Altitude, as used in this report, refers to distance above the vertical datum.

Specific conductance is given in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius (μS/cm at 

25 °C).

Concentrations of chemical constituents in soil are given either in milligrams per kilogram (mg/

kg) or micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg). Milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) is equivalent to parts 

per million (ppm) and micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg) is equivalent to parts per billion (ppb) for 

constituent concentrations in soil.

Concentrations of chemical constituents in water are given either in milligrams per liter (mg/L) 

or micrograms per liter (μg/L). Milligrams per liter (mg/L) is equivalent to parts per million 

(ppm) and micrograms per liter (μg/L) is equivalent to parts per billion (ppb) for constituent 

concentrations in water.

Concentrations of chemical constituents in plants are given either in parts per million (ppm), 

parts per billion (ppb), or percent (%). Parts per million (ppm) is equivalent to milligrams per 

kilogram (mg/kg), parts per billion (ppb) is equivalent to micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg), and 

percent (%) is equivalent to 10,000 parts per million (ppm). 
vi

Laboratory reporting level (LRL) is generally equal to twice the yearly determined long-term 

method detection level. The LRL controls false negative error. The probability of falsely reporting 

a nondetection for a sample that contained an constituent at a concentration equal to or greater 

than the LRL is predicted to be less than or equal to 1 percent (Childress and others, 1999).
Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the 

Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, began a reconnaissance study of a site in Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, in 

2005 by testing soil, shallow ground water, and plant material 

for the presence of trace elements and semivolatile organic 

compounds. Chemical analysis of plant material at the site was 

investigated as a preliminary tool to determine the extent of 

contamination at the site. 

Thirty soil samples were collected from 15 soil cores 

during October 2005 and analyzed for trace elements and 

semivolatile organic compounds. Five small-diameter, 

polyvinyl-chloride-cased wells were installed and groundwater samples were collected during December 2005 and May 

2006 and analyzed for trace elements and semivolatile organic 

compounds. Thirty Johnsongrass samples and 16 Coralberry 

samples were collected during September 2005 and analyzed 

for 53 constituents, including trace elements. 

Results of the soil, ground-water, and plant data indicate 

that the areas of trace element and semivolatile organic compound contamination are located in the shallow (A–horizon) 

soils near the threading barn. Most of the trace-element concentrations in the soils on the study site were either similar to 

or less than trace-element concentrations in background soils. 

Several trace elements and semivolatile organic compounds 

exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 

6, Human Health Medium-Specific Screening Levels 2007 

for Tap Water, Residential Soils, Industrial Indoor Soils, and 

Industrial Outdoor Soils.

There was little or no correlation between the plant and 

soil sample concentrations and the plant and ground-water 

concentrations based on the current sample size and study 

design. The lack of correlation between trace-element concentrations in plants and soils, and plants and ground water 

indicate that plant sampling was not useful as a preliminary 

tool to assess contamination at the study site.

Introduction

The state of Oklahoma has a well-known history of oil 

and gas production beginning in the late 1800s (Oklahoma 

Energy Resources Board, 2006). Oilfield-service sites were an 

integral part of the oil and gas industry and used for storage 

and maintenance of oilfield equipment. The Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma was working to reclaim an oilfieldservice site near Shawnee, Oklahoma and needed to determine 

the nature and extent of contamination to aid clean-up efforts. 

The oilfield service-site contained production storage tanks, 

production pipe, and warehouses and other buildings that were 

used to clean and cut production pipe. Wastes left behind on 

the oilfield-service site in Shawnee, Oklahoma consisted of 

pipes, cuttings from pipe threading, hydraulic fluid, oils, and 

solvents. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, began a 

reconnaissance study of a site in Pottawatomie County (fig. 1) 

in 2005 by testing soil, shallow ground water, and plant material for the presence of trace elements and semivolatile organic 

compounds (SVOCs). The objectives of the study were to 

(1) summarize soil, ground-water, and plant data collected 

for the reconnaissance study, (2) determine if trace-element 

concentrations from this study were similar to background 

concentrations in the area, (3) report exceedances of the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region 6, Human 

Health Medium-Specific Screening Levels 2007 for Tap 

Water, Residential Soils, Industrial Indoor Soils, and Industrial 

Outdoor Soils, and (4) investigate chemical analysis of plant 

material as a preliminary tool to determine the extent of contamination at the site. The results of this study will support the 

Absentee Shawnee Tribe clean-up efforts on the site.

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of this report is to present the results of 

the soil, ground-water, and plant analyses at the abandoned 

oilfield-service site and compare them to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency screening level criteria for human 

Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant 

Contamination at an Abandoned Oilfield-Service Site near 

Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

By Shana L. Mashburn and S. Jerrod Smith
2 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

health. The utility of plant material analysis as a surrogate for 

soil and ground-water contamination with trace elements also 

is discussed. The scope of this report was limited to a specific 

study area of approximately 20 acres and was restricted to 

analysis of trace elements and SVOCs present in soil, shallow 

ground water, and plants. The scope of this report also was 

confined by the period of data collection from September 2005 

to May 2006. 

Description of Study Area

The abandoned oilfield-service site is approximately 

20 acres in size and located south of Shawnee, Oklahoma, near 

an upland terrace south of the North Canadian River 

(fig. 1). A small intermittent creek is located in the center 

of the property that drains to Squirrel Creek and eventually the North Canadian River. The site is underlain by the 

Oscar Group, a red-brown to gray shale and orange-brown 

fine-grained, crossbedded sandstone of Pennsylvanian age 

(Bingham and Moore, 1975) ranging from 570 to 940 feet in 

thickness (Christenson and others, 1992). Parkhurst and others 

(1996) refer to the Oscar Group as the Chase, Council Grove, 

and Admire Groups of Permian age, which composes part of 

the Central Oklahoma aquifer (COA). The COA is used to 

supply water for municipal, domestic, industrial, and agricultural needs (Tortorelli, 2004). 

Soils were generally silt loam of the Port and Chickasha 

soil series (Soil Conservation Service, 1977). The Port series 

consist of very deep, well drained, moderately permeable 

flood plain soils that formed in calcareous loamy alluvium 

of recent age. Soil cores on the site contained some terrace 

deposits, but those deposits were very thin and discontinuous. 

Native vegetation on Port soils was tall grasses with a canopy 

of pecan, black walnut, bur oak, and eastern cottonwood trees. 

The Chickasha series consists of deep, well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in material weathered from 

sandstone of Permian age. Native vegetation on the Chickasha soils was tallgrass prairie. Precipitation near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma, is about 35 to 40 inches annually (Oklahoma 

Climatological Survey, 2002). Rainfall is most abundant from 

March to May and least abundant from December to February 

(Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 2002).

Local hydrology at the site consists of shallow semipermeable unconsolidated material (silty clay loam) that has 

limited hydrologic connection to the intermittent creek and the 

Oscar Group bedrock. Ground water in the shallow unconsolidated material is present under perched conditions. A tight 

mudstone at the base of the unconsolidated material confines 

the bedrock aquifer and limits the potential for surface and 

subsurface contaminants to be transported to the bedrock 

aquifer. Shallow ground water in the unconsolidated material 

potentially drains to the creek. Surface and subsurface contamination could potentially enter the creek and travel downstream. No flow was observed in the intermittent creek during 

dry periods of the year.

The site was used as a pipe and supply yard for local 

oilfield production activities from the early 1960s to the mid1990s (Renee Hood, Absentee Shawnee Tribe, oral commun., 

2005). Activities on the site included storage of several types 

of oilfield production pipes, separators and production oil 

storage tanks; cleaning the pipes and equipment, and cutting 

new threads on the pipes. Buildings on the site were used for 

vehicle maintenance, pipe threading, storage, and offices (fig. 

2). The site contained piles of debris, including solid wastes, 

metal shavings, lead-acid batteries, and metal barrels containing hydraulic fluids and solvents (fig. 3). 

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of 

Oklahoma, Office of Environmental Protection staff for their 

assistance in the study. Renee Hood coordinated all project 

activities; Roger Anderson, Mark Williams, and Kevin Smith 

provided assistance for field activities and data collection. 

Sincere thanks to Lacy Jo Burgess, University of Oklahoma 

student, for plant species identification and percent coverage 

of the site. The authors thank Shea Clark Smith of Minerals 

Exploration and Environmental Geochemistry Laboratory 

(MEG Labs) for his knowledge and advice on biogeochemistry sampling. Additional thanks to Jason Masoner, U.S. 

Geological Survey, for assisting with data collection.

Data Collection and Analysis

Most samples for this study were collected from the 

east side of the study area. The east side contained apparent 

subsurface contamination based on previous site assessments 

done by the Absentee Shawnee Tribe (Renee Hood, Absentee 

Shawnee Tribe, oral commun., 2005) The west side of the 

study area appeared to contain mostly above ground debris. 

Soil cores were collected with a Geoprobe. Five wells were 

installed to collect ground-water samples and to measure water 

levels. Johnsongrass and Coralberry plant material samples 

were collected from the site for chemical analysis.

Field Procedures

Thirty soil samples were collected from 15 soil cores. 

The cores were collected by use of a truck-mounted Geoprobe 

during October 2005. A Geoprobe is a hydraulically powered 

sampling and logging tool that uses both static force and percussion to advance into the ground. Soil cores were collected 

from land surface to the point of refusal, which was assumed 

to be the soil-bedrock interface. Soil cores were retrieved from 

1.5-inch diameter by 48 inches long plastic sleeves. Ten coring 

locations were near previously collected plant sample sites 

for investigation of possible correlation between plant and 

soil trace-element concentrations. Five coring locations were 
Data Collection and Analysis 3

Figure 1. Location of study area near Shawnee, Oklahoma.

intermittent creek Tecumseh

Lake

City of Shawnee

Study Area

Squirrel Creek

North Canadian River

! !

! !

!

!! ! ! !

! !

!!

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! !

£¤177

UV18

UV3

177

Benedict Highland Beard

Harrison

Farrall

Kickapoo

Lake

Kickapoo Spur

Map Shawnee compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Hydrography from National Hydrography DatasetHigh Resolution, downloaded 2006

Streets from StreetMap USA

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

0 0 0.25 .5 1 Mile

0 1 0.5 K 2 ilometers

35°17'

96°57' 96°56' 96°55' 96°54'

35°18'

35°19'

35°20'
4 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

Figure 2. Abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.

EXPLANATION

Threading 

Barn

Storage

Shed

Vehicle

Maintenance

Garage

Storage

Shed

Office

Facilities

Tank Storage

Yard

96°56'50" 96°56'40"

35°17'30"

35°17'20"

Map compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Aerial image from Absentee Shawnee Tribe, June 2004

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

0 0 0.025 M .05 0.1 ile

0 1 50 00 200 Meters

boundary of oilfield-service site
Data Collection and Analysis 5

Figure 3. Buildings and debris on abandoned oilfield-service site 

near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006. (Photographs taken by S. Jerrod 

Smith, U.S. Geological Survey.)
6 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

selected in poorly vegetated areas. Coring locations also were 

dependent on apparent surface contamination and by accessibility (fig. 4). The cores were processed at a field laboratory 

on site. Two parallel cuts along the length of the core sleeve 

were made with two parallel stainless steel hook blades to 

expose the 1.5-inch soil core for descriptions of color and texture. The parallel cuts penetrated only the plastic core sleeve 

and not the material inside the core. The cores were described 

to identify soil horizons for sampling and to provide general 

information regarding presence of ground water and possible 

contaminants. After the cores were described, two soil samples 

were collected from each core for a total of 30 soil samples. 

Each soil sample was collected using a decontaminated plastic 

spoon to prevent cross-contamination between soil samples. 

Each sample was collected from the center of the core, ranging 

from 3 to 6 inches of core length, to prevent contact of soil 

sample with any possible contaminant residue on the core 

sleeve. Sixteen ounces of core material were collected into two 

8-ounce glass containers for each sample and shipped overnight. Soil samples were collected from the B and C soil horizons to observe possible leaching into the substratum. The C 

horizon was usually below the water table and where the well 

screens were installed. If there was apparent contamination in 

the core, samples were collected from the contaminated zone 

and from an uncontaminated zone, which were not necessarily 

from the B and C soil horizons. Examples of apparent contamination include petroleum odor, metal shavings, and soil with 

color and consistency of tar. Soil samples were labeled with an 

identifier corresponding to the sequential order of coring and a 

letter representing the soil horizon from which the sample was 

collected. If more than one sample was collected from a soil 

horizon, a number followed the soil horizon letter to indicate the sequence of the samples (example B1 and B2). Soil 

samples were shipped to Severn Trent Laboratories, Arvada, 

Colorado, for analysis of trace elements using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods 6010B and 6020, and for 

SVOCs using method 8270C. Three replicate soil samples 

also were submitted to assess laboratory analytical error and 

sample variation, and are discussed in appendix 1.

Five 0.5-inch diameter, polyvinyl-chloride(pvc)-cased 

wells were installed with a Geoprobe to collect ground-water 

samples. The water table was identified by apparent water 

saturation in the soil cores. Well locations were selected near 

the creek because shallow ground water was not found in the 

upland areas of the site (fig. 4). Wells ranged in total depth 

from 15 to 24 feet, with a 3-foot screen attached to the end of 

the casing. Water samples were collected during December 

2005 and May 2006 for analysis of trace elements and SVOCs. 

Three well volumes were purged prior to sampling the shallow wells. Ground water was sampled from the shallow wells 

using a peristaltic pump and C-flex tubing that was replaced 

between wells. Ground-water samples were labeled with an 

identifier that corresponds to the well from which the samples 

were collected. Sampling dates were chosen to observe possible seasonal differences in trace element and SVOC concentrations. The least amount of rain falls in Oklahoma from 

December to February (Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 

2002). During this time the plants are dormant and evapotranspiration is minimal. The greatest amount of rain falls in Oklahoma from March to May when the plants are more active and 

evapotranspiration is high. 

An existing water-supply well on the site (referred to in 

this report as the Old Well) was sampled on December 2005 

and May 2006 for analysis of trace elements and SVOCs (fig. 

4). Records about construction information are not available 

for the Old Well. The depth of the Old Well was approximately greater than 250 feet. The depth was determined from 

the depth of the pump after the pump was pulled from the 

well. This old well was most likely completed in the Oscar 

Group (Chase, Council Grove, and Admire Groups). A waterquality sample was collected from water in the Old Well to 

compare deep and shallow water quality in the study area. The 

Old Well was not purged because of logistical considerations 

for disposal of any purged water; therefore, a grab sample was 

collected at the water surface using a Teflon bailer. 

All ground-water samples were analyzed at the USGS 

National Water Quality Laboratory, Lakewood, Colorado, 

for laboratory schedules 2703 (dissolved trace elements) and 

1383 (SVOCs). Quality control for the ground-water samples 

consisted of one equipment blank, one field blank, and two 

replicate environmental samples (appendix 1). Water levels 

were measured with an electric tape in the installed wells and 

the Old Well during January 2006 and May 2006 at the time of 

sampling. Water levels also were measured during December 

2005 and March 2006 to determine any seasonal differences in 

water levels.

An initial survey was conducted during June 2005 to 

identify the plant species available for sampling on the site. 

Individual plants were identified along nine east-west 20-meter transects across the site (fig. 5). Percent coverage of each 

plant species was calculated for each transect. The survey 

indicated there were two distinct vegetation zones or groups 

of species in the study area. One group prefers direct sunlight 

(open grassland) and the other group prefers shade (dense 

covered). Ideally, only one species of plant would be sampled 

across the site; although the initial survey proved this was not 

possible. The open grassland zones were dominated by Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and Goldenrod (Solidago spp.). 

The dense covered zones were dominated by Coralberry (Symphoricarpos orbiculatus) and Saw Greenbrier (Smilax bonanox L.) (table 1). Open grassland zones cover about 65 percent 

of the site and dense covered zones cover about 35 percent of 

the site. Johnsongrass was selected for sampling in the open 

grassland zones, and Coralberry was selected for sampling in 

the dense covered zones. These perennial plants were selected 

for sampling because of the relatively high amounts of water 

used for growth, and abundance in the study area. Thirty Johnsongrass samples and 16 Coralberry samples were collected 

during September 2005. Plant sample locations (fig. 5) were 

determined based on abundance of species at each location in 

order to obtain enough plant material for analysis. Each plant 

sample was collected using nitrile gloves and decontaminated 
Data Collection and Analysis 7

Figure 4. Locations of soil coring sites and installed wells (including existing supply well labeled Old Well) near Shawnee, 

Oklahoma, 2005–2006.

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R !R

!R

!R

!R

Old Well

Well 4

Well 3

Well 1

Well 2

Well 5

#

SW 3

SS9

SS8

SS7

SS6

SS5

SS4

SS3

SS2

SS1

SS15

SS14

SS13

SS12 SS11

SS10

96°56'45" 96°56'40" 96°56'35"

35°17'25"

35°17'30"

35°17'35"

0 0 0.025 M .05 0.1 ile

0 8 40 0 160 Meters

Map compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Aerial image from Absentee Shawnee Tribe, June 2004

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

EXPLANATION

!R

#

boundary of oilfield-service site

Soil Coring Location

Wells

Surface-water sample location
8 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

Figure 5. Locations of transects for initial plant survey and plant sampling sites near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

46C

45C

44C

43C

42C

41C

40C

39C

38C

37C

36C

35C

34C

33C

32C

31C

30J

29J

28J

27J

26J

25J

24J

23J

22J

21J

20J 19J

18J

17J

16J

15J

14J 13J

12J

11J

10J 09J 08J

07J

06J

05J

04J

03J

02J

01J

96°56'45" 96°56'40" 96°56'35"

35°17'25"

35°17'30"

35°17'35"

Map compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Aerial image from Absentee Shawnee Tribe, June 2004

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

EXPLANATION 0 0 0.025 M .05 0.1 ile

0 8 40 0 160 Meters

boundary of oilfield-service site

20-meter length transect for initial plant 

survey

Johnsongrass Sample

Coralberry Sample
Data Collection and Analysis 

9

Table 1. Percent coverages of plants in Open Grassland Zones and Dense Covered Zones at the abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005.[Scientific and common names from United States Department of Agriculture (2007)]

Open grassland zones

(Transects A, B, F, G)

Scientific name

Common name Percent 

coverage

Dense covered zones

(Transects C, D, E, H, I)

Scientific name

Common name Percent 

coverage

Sorghum halepense Johnsongrass 17.75 Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Coralberry 28.00Solidago spp. Goldenrod 14.31 Smilax bona-nox Saw greenbrier 16.10Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Coralberry 9.44 Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle 8.80Echinochloa crus-galli Barnyardgrass 6.13 Smilax rotundifolia Roundleaf greenbrier 5.80Rubus argutus Sawtooth blackberry 5.94 Toxicodendron radicans Eastern poison ivy 5.30unknown grass unknown grass 5.13 unknown grass unknown grass 3.80Arachniodes spp. Fern 5.06 unknown 4 unknown 4 2.30Juniperus virginiana Eastern redcedar 4.44 Rubus argutus Sawtooth blackberry 2.20Coreopsis tinctoria Golden tickseed 4.13 Cocculus carolinus Coralina coral bead 1.60Ambrosia psilostachya Cuman ragweed 3.81 Cyclanthera dissecta Cutleaf cyclanthera 1.60Digitaria sanguinalis Hairy crabgrass 2.00 Ulmus americana American elm 1.50unknown 5 unknown 5 1.38 Carya alba Mockernut hickory 1.40Digitaria ciliaris Southern crabgrass 1.38 Argemone polyanthemos Crested pricklypoppy 1.10Melilotus officinalis Yellow sweetclover 1.31 Juniperus virginiana Eastern redcedar 1.00Argemone polyanthemos Crested pricklypoppy 1.00 unknown 3 unknown 3 0.90Erigeron annuus Eastern daisy fleabane 1.00 Torilis arvensis Spreading hedgeparsley 0.90Torilis arvensis Spreading hedgeparsley 0.94 Carya illinoinensis Pecan 0.70Smilax bona-nox Saw greenbrier 0.88 unknown 1 unknown 1 0.60Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle 0.63 Vitis cinerea Graybark grape 0.50Plantago patagonica Woolly plantain 0.63 Gleditsia triacanthos Honeylocust 0.30Passiflora incarnata Purple passionflower 0.50 Salix exigua Narrowleaf willow 0.20Salix nigra Black willow 0.38 Parthenocissus quinquefolia Virginia creeper 0.20Sabatia campestris Texas star 0.31 Cercis canadensis Eastern redbud 0.10Geum canadense White avens 0.25 bare bare 15.10unknown 4 unknown 4 0.25Melilotus alba White sweetclover 0.25unknown 1 unknown 1 0.25Prunus mexicana Mexican plum 0.25
10 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 1. Percent coverages of plants in Open Grassland Zones and Dense Covered Zones at the abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005. [Scientific and common names from United States Department of Agriculture (2007)] Open grassland zones (Transects A, B, F, G) Scientific name Common name Percent coverage Dense covered zones (Transects C, D, E, H, I) Scientific name Common name Percent coverage Solanum carolinense Carolina horsenettle 0.19 Cyclanthera dissecta Cutleaf cyclanthera 0.13 Chamaecrista fasciculata Sleeping plant 0.13 Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass 0.13 bare bare 8.63 disturbed disturbed 1.13 —Continued
Data Collection and Analysis 11

stainless steel scissors to prevent cross-contamination between 

samples. Johnsongrass was collected by cutting with scissors 

the main stem an inch above the soil. Leaves and stems were 

then folded to fit into a cloth sample bag. Coralberry samples 

were collected by cutting with scissors the most recent growth 

where it joined the main stem and placing leaves, berries, and 

stems into a cloth sample bag. 

Each plant sample was labeled with an identifier corresponding to sequential order of sampling and the letter J or C, 

indicating Johnsongrass or Coralberry sample. Cloth sample 

bags were placed in a cardboard box and shipped to Minerals 

Exploration and Environmental Geochemistry Laboratories 

(MEG Labs), Carson City, Nevada. The samples were dried 

and washed in tap water at the lab to remove any dirt and foreign debris. Leaves and stems of Johnsongrass samples were 

extracted for chemical analysis. Only the leaves of the Coralberry samples were extracted for chemical analysis. All plant 

samples were analyzed for 53 constituents, including trace 

elements, by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. 

Quality control for the plant samples consisted of six replicate 

environmental samples (appendix 1).

Plant tissue analysis has been used as a tool in mineral 

exploration or prospecting since the early 1930s (Rose and 

others, 1979). The science behind this tool is based on the 

ability of plants to uptake constituents from ground water. 

Meinzer (1923) defined a phreatophyte as a plant that habitually obtains its water supply from the zone of saturation, either 

directly or through the capillary fringe. Phreatophytes have 

been shown to be general indicators of ground-water quality 

(Meinzer, 1927). Although the plants sampled in this study 

are not categorized as phreatophytes, both species use relatively high amounts of water for growth (U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, 2007). The phreatophytes that were present on the 

site did not abundantly cover the study area; therefore phreatophytes were not used for sampling. Plant tissue analysis has 

been used more recently to identify areas of environmental 

contamination. Erdman and Christenson (2000) correlated 

boron, sodium, bromine, and strontium concentrations in cottonwood leaves to constituent concentrations in ground water 

and used the relations to determine the extent of a landfill 

leachate plume. Erdman and others (2003) determined the 

extent of a contamination plume near a silver mining district 

by identifying the anomalous presence of zinc and cadmium in 

willow leaves. 

Data Analysis

Data analysis methods used in this study consist of 

graphical, statistical, and geospatial techniques. Many detections of trace elements in soil samples occurred, because trace 

elements occur naturally in soils at detectable concentrations 

(Smith and others, 2005). Tukey’s standard boxplots (Helsel 

and Hirsch, 2002) were used to display the summary statistics 

of trace elements in soil samples. Most of the soil samples 

contained no detectable SVOCs, because SVOCs do not occur 

naturally in soils; therefore, any soil sample with a reported 

value was considered greater than background. Trace element 

and SVOC concentrations were totaled to obtain a total concentration per sample. 

Trace-element concentrations in soil samples from this 

study were statistically compared to trace-element concentrations in soils from a study of the COA (Christenson and 

others, 1991) that served as an indicator of background 

concentrations. Trace-element concentrations in soils from 

this study also were statistically compared to trace-element 

concentrations in rock samples from the COA study to determine if the trace-element concentrations in the soils were 

similar to the underlying Oscar Group (Chase, Council Grove, 

and Admire Groups). Statistical comparisons were performed 

using the Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) rank sum test with a 

95 percent confidence interval. The Wilcoxon rank sum test 

is a nonparametric test that determines if the medians of two 

independent data groups are statistically different. Data were 

censored to a single value less than the highest reporting level 

for each constituent to account for multiple reporting levels in 

the two data sets (Helsel, 2005). The tie correction equation 

was used to account for multiple tied ranks in the data as suggested by Helsel and Hirsch (2002).

Most of the trace elements and SVOCs were not detectable in ground-water samples. Trace-element concentrations 

in ground water from this study were compared to previous 

ground-water data in the USGS National Water Information 

System database (http://waterdata.usgs.gov/ok/nwis) from the 

shallow bedrock aquifers in Pottawatomie County to determine if the trace-element concentrations from this study were 

similar to background concentrations.

The soil and ground-water analytical results were compared to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 

6, Human Health Medium-Specific Screening Levels 2007 

for Tap Water, Residential Soils, Industrial Indoor Soils, and 

Industrial Outdoor Soils (U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 2006). This comparison provided a baseline to determine the areas for clean-up efforts. 

As in soil samples, trace elements occur naturally in plant 

tissue at detectable concentrations (Shea Clark Smith, MEG 

Labs, oral commun., 2005). The laboratory reported detectable concentrations in most of the plant samples. Johnsongrass 

and Coralberry samples were separated into two data sets for 

analysis because it was apparent that trace element uptake 

varied among the two species. Boxplots were used to display 

the summary statistics of trace elements in plant samples. 

Plant data were compared to the soil data using the 

Spearman rho or Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The 

Spearman rank correlation coefficient is a nonparametric statistical test that can identify both linear and nonlinear relations 

between two populations of data. A 95 percent confidence 

interval was used to determine if significant correlation existed 

between the plant and soil trace-element concentrations. Plant 

data were compared to the ground-water data by a geospatial 

comparison because of the small set of ground-water data. The 

possible correlation of plant data to ground-water data would 
12 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

indicate plants take up constituents from the shallow ground 

water. The possible correlation of plant data to soil data would 

indicate that the soil plays a role in the uptake of constituents 

by plants. Any correlation between these data would indicate 

that plant sampling could be used as a preliminary tool to 

assess contamination.

Soil Characteristics

Soil characteristics are important to understanding the 

possible migration pathways for contaminants. Clays typically 

act as barriers and sands act as conduits to ground water and 

solute migration. 

Physical Properties

The 15 soil cores ranged in depth from 45 to 288 inches. 

The soil-bedrock interface was often difficult to distinguish 

because local bedrock was poorly consolidated. Soil texture 

was determined from the feel of fresh, moist core samples, and 

descriptions in the Soil Survey of Pottawatomie County (Soil 

Conservation Service, 1977). Texture generally became finer 

with depth in the soil profile, typically ranging from silt loam 

or loam near the surface (A horizon) to silty clay or silty clay 

loam at depth (B and C horizons) (fig. 6). Where undisturbed, 

the A horizon was usually dark or light brown with fine granular structure. B and C horizons were usually red-brown to red 

with fine to medium prismatic structure, reflecting the increase 

in percent clay with depth. Soil color terms are subjective and 

were used only as a means of differentiating between zones in 

each individual core. The descriptions should not be considered as standardized or comparable between cores. The color 

and composition of the C horizon varied widely depending 

on the characteristics of the parent material. Green-gray iron 

reduction spots and sandstone rock fragments, which were 

derived from the bedrock, were present near the base of some 

cores. The C horizon was generally composed of thick hard 

clay, but sandy zones were identified in several cores in the C 

horizon. Small carbonate nodules and unidentified black spots, 

possibly manganese, were often distributed throughout the B 

and C horizons. The diameter of these features was generally 

.05 to 0.5 inches and appeared to be slightly larger below the 

water table in the deeper sections of the profile. 

Soil core SS4 was representative of the soil profile at well 

1 (fig. 7). Soil core SS1 was representative of the soil profile at 

wells 2 and 5 (fig. 8). Soil core SS7 was representative of the 

soil profile at wells 3 and 4 (fig. 9). The soil profile in SS1 was 

generally coarser and more developed than the profile in SS7. 

This was possibly because SS1 was located closer to Squirrel Creek and the North Canadian River floodplain. Saturated 

zones were identified at a depth of 16 feet from land surface in 

SS7 and at a depth of about 20 feet from land surface in SS1. 

Chemical Analysis

Trace-element concentrations were totaled for seven trace 

elements (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, 

and zinc) to determine total trace element concentration per 

sample (raw data in appendix 2). Soil sample SS15–A contained a total trace element concentration of 964,563 micrograms per kilogram (μg/kg) for the seven trace elements. Soil 

sample SS13–A contained a total trace element concentration 

of 625,930 μg/kg for the seven trace elements (fig. 10). 

The detectable SVOC concentrations were totaled to 

determine a total SVOC concentration per sample (raw data in 

appendix 2). Soil sample SS13–A had the most SVOC detections of all the sites, and contained 17 different compounds 

with a total SVOC concentration of 151,300 μg/kg (fig. 10). 

Soil sample SS4–A contained 11 SVOCs with a total SVOC 

concentration of 2,242 μg/kg.

A study of the COA (Mosier and others, 1991) analyzed 

outcropping rocks and soils from the B horizon for 44 elements. The purpose of the COA study was to understand 

rock-water interaction through analysis of chemistry, hydrology, and geochemical analysis of solid constituents (not water) 

within the aquifer. Trace-element concentrations in COA soil 

and bedrock samples from Pottawatomie County were compared to concentrations from this study (fig. 11). Samples with 

nondetectable concentrations were reassigned a value of half 

the laboratory reporting level for plotting purposes; the laboratory reporting level is indicated on the boxplot. Cadmium 

and silver are not included in the boxplot, because all sample 

values in the COA study (Mosier and others, 1991) were less 

than the laboratory reporting level of 2 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). 

Results from the Wilcoxon rank sum test show that the 

trace element median concentrations in soil from this study 

were either similar to or less than median concentrations 

in soil from the COA study. Arsenic, lead, nickel, and zinc 

median concentrations in soils from this study were greater 

than concentrations in COA rock samples. Chromium, copper, 

and manganese median concentrations in soils from this study 

were similar to median concentrations in COA rock samples. 

Results from this statistical comparison of median concentrations suggest that the trace-element concentrations in soils 

from the study area are not elevated above background soil 

concentrations, although some are elevated above outcropping 

COA rock concentrations.

The soil sample laboratory results were compared to the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Human 

Health Medium-Specific Screening Levels 2007 for Residential, Industrial Indoor, and Industrial Outdoor Soils (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006) (table 2). These screening 

levels address common human health exposure pathways, but 

do not consider all exposure pathways nor address ecological 

concerns. Soil samples SS1–C, SS6–C, and SS7–C exceeded 

the Residential Soil Screening Level for manganese of 3,200 

mg/kg. All other sample values for manganese were less than 

the Industrial Indoor and Industrial Outdoor Soil Screening 
Soil Characteristics 13

C

Sand

Silt

 0 

 20 

 40 

 60 

 80 

 100 

PERCENT SAND

PERCENT CLAY

100

80

60

40

20

0

100

80

60

40

20

0

Clay

Sandy

clay

Silty

clay

Silty clay

loam Clay loam

Sandy clay loam

Sandy loam

Loamy

 sand

Silt loam

Loam

PERCENT SILT

A

B

C

Figure 6. Approximate range in soil textures found in the A, B, and C horizons of soil cores collected from 

abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 (Modified from United States Department of 

Agriculture, 1993).
14 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Red-brown Dark brown Dark red-brown Unidentified black spots Gray-green reduction spots Roots Unidentified gray nodules

A

Sampled interval with identification number

Soil horizon name

SS4A

A

B

0142653

120

129

B

C

C

R

X

Clay

Silty clay

Silty c al y lo ma ilt lo S

ma

Fine sandy lo ma

X

X

X

Clay

Silty clay

Silty clay lo ma

Silt lo ma

X

Depth, in

inches

60

X

SS4B

2072

X

X

91

SS4A

Lo ma y fine sand

Fine sandy lo ma

Lo ma y fine sand

Mudstone

Depth, in

inches EXPLANATION

Figure 7. Descriptive log of soil textures found in soil core SS4 representative of well 1 near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.
Soil Characteristics 15

A

B

0

14

31

46

96

172

192

238

242

288

B

C

C

R

X

Clay Silty clay Silty clay lo

ma

Silt lo

ma

Lo

ma y fine sand

X

X

X

Clay Silty clay Silty clay lo

ma

Silt lo

ma

Lo

ma y fine sand

X

X

Clay Silty clay Silty clay lo

ma

Silt lo

ma

Lo

ma y fine sand

X

X

X

C al y Silty clay Silty clay lo

ma

Silt lo

ma

Lo

ma y fine sand

X

X

Depth, in

inches

Unknown

282285

16

51

X

X

X

X

X

Dark red-brown Red

Dark brown Red-brown

Unidentifiedblack spots

Carbonatenodules Roots Rock fragments

(siltstone andmudstone)

A Soil horizon name

Water table

EXPLANATION

Sampled interval with identification number

SS1C

SS1B

SS1C

Depth, in

inches

Depth, in

inches

Depth, in

inches

Figure 8. Descriptive log of soil textures found in soil core SS1 representative of wells 2 and 5 near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.
16 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006Yellow-brown

A

B

0

12

21

4868

109

170

192

234

242

288

C

R

B

C

X

Clay

Silty clay

Silty clay lo ma

Silt lo ma

Silt

X

X

XX

Clay

Silty clay

Silty clay lo ma

Silt lo ma

Silt

X

X

Clay

Silty clay

Silty clay lo ma

Silt lo ma

Silt

X

X

X

Clay

Silty clay

Silty clay lo ma

Silt lo ma

Silt

X

X

Depth, in

inches

Mudstone

RedBrown Yellow-red

Unidentifiedblack spots

Carbonatenodules Roots Rock fragments

(sandstone)

A Soil horizon name

Water table

EXPLANATION

Sampled interval with identification number

SS7C

SS7C

SS7B

Depth, in

inches

Depth, in

inches

Depth, in

inches

Figure 9. Descriptive log of soil textures found in soil core SS7 representative of wells 3 and 4 near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.
Soil Characteristics 17

Figure 10. Total trace-element and semivolatile organic compound concentrations in soil samples near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 

2005–2006.

SS1

SS2

SS3

SS15 SS8

SS5

SS4

SS7

SS6

SS12 SS11

SS10

SS9

SS13

SS14

96°56'45" 96°56'40" 96°56'35"

35°17'25"

35°17'30"

35°17'35"

Map compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Aerial image from Absentee Shawnee Tribe, June 2004

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

0 0 0.025 M .05 0.1 ile

0 8 40 0 160 Meters

EXPLANATION

TOTAL TRACE-ELEMENT

CONCENTRATION IN

MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM

TOTAL SEMIVOLATILE

ORGANIC COMPOUND

CONCENTRATION IN

MICROGRAMS PER KILOGRAM

> 100,000

10,000 - 100,000

1,000 - 10,000

100 - 1,000

50 - 100

0

> 500,000

100,000 - 500,000

50,000 - 100,000

< 50,000

shallow

samples

deep

samples

boundary of oilfield-service site
18 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

x

x

xx

x

x

xx

xx

xx

x

xx

xxx

xx

xx

x

x

xxxxxx

x

xxxx

xxx

CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION, IN MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM 10 1.0

0.1

100

1,000

10,000

100,000

LRL LRL

LRL

LRL

Arsenic Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Manganese Zinc

30 27 70 30 27 70 30 27 70 30 27 70 30 27 70 30 27 70 30 27 70

Soil, this studySoil, (Mosier and others, 1991)Rock, (Mosier and others, 1991) Number of samples 

x Outlier

First data value less than or equal to 1.5 times the interquartile  range, referenced from the 75th percentile

75th percentileMedian25th percentileFirst data value greater than or equal to 1.5 times the interquartile  range, referenced from the 25th percentile

EXPLANATION

30

Interquartile range

LRL Laboratory reporting level, shown only for data sets with values below LRL

Mean

LRL

Figure 11. Trace-element concentrations in soil from abandoned oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 and soil and bedrock samples collected from Central Oklahoma aquifer in Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, 1991.
Soil Characteristics 19

Table 2. Summary table for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Human Health Medium-Specific screening level exceedances.[mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/L, micrograms per liter; E, estimated value; USEPA, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]

Sample median Sample name Constituent Measured value

USEPA screening level1

Residential 

soil

(mg/kg)

Industrial 

indoor soil

(mg/kg)

Industrial 

outdoor soil

(mg/kg)

Tap water

(μg/L)

SS1–C manganese 15,000 mg/kg 3,200 47,000 35,000SS6–C manganese 6,400 mg/kg 3,200 47,000 35,000SS7–C manganese 5,500 mg/kg 3,200 47,000 35,000SS4–A benzo(a)pyrene E 0.1 mg/kg 0.015 0.78 0.23SS13–A benzo(a)anthracene 11 mg/kg 0.15 7.8 2.3SS13–A benzo(a)pyrene 7.5 mg/kg 0.015 0.78 0.23SS13–A benzo(b)fluoranthene 13 mg/kg 0.15 7.8 2.3SS13–A dibenz(ah)anthracene 2.9 mg/kg 0.015 0.78 0.23SS13–A indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 3.6 mg/kg 0.15 7.8 2.3SW 3 Dec manganese 4,420 μg/L 1,700Well 2 Dec bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate E 10 μg/L 4.8Old Well Dec arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.13 μg/L 0.045Well 2 Dec arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.28 μg/L 0.045SW Well 3 Dec arsenic (cancer endpoint) 3.1 μg/L 0.045Well 4 Dec arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.26 μg/L 0.045Well 5 Dec arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.34 μg/L 0.045Old Well May arsenic (cancer endpoint) <.24 μg/L 0.045Well 2 May arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.3 μg/L 0.045Well 4 May arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.36 μg/L 0.045Well 5 May arsenic (cancer endpoint) 0.29 μg/L 0.045

1 Screening levels from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 Human Health Medium-Specific Screening Levels, 2007 for Residential, Industrial Indoor, and 

Industrial Outdoor Soils (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006)

Soil Ground Water
20 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

Table 3. Ground-water levels measured in wells near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005-2006.

[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ~, approximately; nw, no water in well]

Local identifier Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date

Well depth

(feet below 

land surface)

Water level

(feet below 

land surface)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/5/2005 ~ 250 36.6

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 1/20/2006 ~ 250 37.8

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 1/20/2006 15 nw

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 1/20/2006 24 11.8

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 1/20/2006 19 14.6

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 1/20/2006 22 12.8

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 1/20/2006 17 10.9

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 3/20/2006 ~ 250 36.9

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 3/20/2006 15 nw

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 3/20/2006 24 9.9

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 3/20/2006 19 14.0

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 3/20/2006 22 12.3

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 3/20/2006 17 8.7

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 3/21/2006 ~ 250 37.1

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 3/21/2006 15 nw

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 3/21/2006 24 9.9

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 3/21/2006 19 14.1

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 3/21/2006 22 12.4

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 3/21/2006 17 8.8

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 3/22/2006 ~ 250 36.8

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 3/22/2006 15 nw

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 3/22/2006 24 10.1

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 3/22/2006 19 14.1

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 3/22/2006 22 12.0

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 3/22/2006 17 10.3

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 3/23/2006 ~ 250 37.6

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 3/23/2006 15 nw

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 3/23/2006 24 10.0

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 3/23/2006 19 13.7

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 3/23/2006 22 12.4

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 3/23/2006 17 10.9

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 3/24/2006 ~ 250 36.9

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 3/24/2006 15 nw
Soil Characteristics 21

Table 3. Ground-water levels measured in wells near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005-2006.

[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ~, approximately; nw, no water in well]

Local identifier Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date

Well depth

(feet below 

land surface)

Water level

(feet below 

land surface)

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 3/24/2006 24 10.0

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 3/24/2006 19 11.1

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 3/24/2006 22 12.4

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 3/24/2006 17 10.8

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 5/1/2006 ~ 250 37.6

Well 1 35.293 -96.944 5/1/2006 15 nw

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 5/1/2006 24 10.0

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 5/1/2006 19 12.1

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 5/1/2006 22 12.5

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 5/1/2006 17 9.0

 

 

—Continued
22 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

#

EXPLANATION

96°56'45" 96°56'40" 96°56'35"

35°17'25"

35°17'30"

35°17'35"

No data

for Well 1

trace-element concentrations in 

histograms are in micrograms per liter

December 2005 samples

May 2006 samples

highest laboratory reporting level 

(LRL), shown only for data sets

with values below highest LRL

December 2005 number of SVOC

 detections

May 2006 number of SVOC detections

0 0 0.025 M .05 0.1 ile

0 8 40 0 160 Meters

Well 2

Well 5

Old Well Well 4

SW 3

Map compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Aerial image from Absentee Shawnee Tribe,

June 2004

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

boundary of oilfield-service site

Figure 12. Trace elements and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) in ground-water samples near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 

2005–2006.
Plant Chemical Analysis and Relation to Trace elements in Soils and Ground Water 23

Levels for manganese. Soil sample SS4–A exceeded the Residential Soil Screening Level for benzo(a)pyrene of 

0.015 mg/kg. Soil sample SS13–A exceeded the Residential 

Soil Screening Levels for benzo(a)anthracene 

(0.15 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (0.015 mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (0.15 mg/kg), dibenz(ah)anthracene 

(0.015 mg/kg), and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (0.15 mg/kg). Soil 

sample SS13–A exceeded the Industrial Indoor Soil Screening 

Levels for benzo(a)anthracene (7.8 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene 

(0.78 mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (7.8 mg/kg), and 

dibenz(ah)anthracene (0.78 mg/kg). Soil sample SS13–A 

exceeded the Industrial Outdoor Soil Screening Levels for 

benzo(a)anthracene (2.3 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene 

(0.23 mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (2.3 mg/kg), dibenz(ah)

anthracene (0.23 mg/kg), and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 

(2.3 mg/kg). 

Ground-Water Chemical Analysis

Ground-water levels were measured in the wells during 

December 2005, and January, March, and May 2006. The 

January median water level was 12.3 feet. The May median 

water level was 11 feet (table 3). The water levels increased 

in all the wells from January to May ranging from 0.3 foot 

to 2.5 feet. The ground-water level also was measured in the 

Old Well in December 2005 at the time the well was sampled. 

Daily ground-water levels were measured for 5 days following 

a 1.73-inch rainfall event on March 18 and 19 (Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 2006) to determine how quickly the wells 

responded to precipitation. The March data indicated that the 

water levels peaked 2 to 3 days after the rain event. The May 

sampling was completed 2 to 3 days after 2.36 inches of rain 

fell on April 28 and 29 (Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 

2006). Wells 1 and 3 did not produce enough water to sample 

during either sampling event. Because Well 3 was located in 

close proximity to the creek, a surface-water sample was collected in December 2005 for laboratory analysis and labeled 

SW 3. 

Old Well, Well 2, SW 3, and Well 5 December groundwater samples had the most trace-element detections

(fig. 12 and appendix 3). Most of these concentrations were 

near the laboratory reporting level. The Old Well contained 

a zinc concentration of 26 micrograms per liter (μg/L). The 

casing for the Old Well was made of steel and water in the 

well was not purged prior to sampling, and some of these trace 

elements could have leached from the casing into the well 

water. Water samples from the Old Well, Well 2, Well 4, and 

Well 5 also had the most trace-element detections in the May 

sampling. Most of these concentrations were near the laboratory reporting level, except the Old Well, which had a zinc 

concentration of 21.8 μg/L. 

December ground-water samples for the Old Well 

contained seven SVOC detections and Well 2 contained four 

SVOC detections. Most of these concentrations were near 

the laboratory reporting level, although SW 3 contained an 

estimated value of 37.8 μg/L for phenol. There were no other 

detections for phenol in either ground-water or soils that 

would indicate phenol was from the study area and most likely 

was from upstream. The presence of some constituents was 

verified, but not quantified. Only one compound (anthracene) 

was detected in May and that was in Well 4. The anthracene 

presence was verified, but not quantified. The increase in 

water levels in the wells during May might have caused some 

dilution of SVOCs in the May ground-water samples; although 

there was no obvious difference in ground-water trace-element 

detections between December and May. 

Dissolved trace-element concentrations from shallow 

(less than 100 feet) bedrock aquifer wells in Pottawatomie 

County were obtained from the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database. Eighty-three samples were 

retrieved from the NWIS database that were collected between 

1977 and 2006. The difference in laboratory reporting levels 

for the NWIS data and data from this study did not permit a 

comparison. 

The ground-water data were compared to the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency Region 6 Human Health 

Medium-Specific Screening Levels 2007 for Tap Water 

(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006) (table 2). The 

December sample from SW 3 exceeded the tap water screening level for manganese of 1,700 μg/L. All wells for both 

December and May exceeded the tap water screening level for 

arsenic of 

0.045 μg/L. The December sample from Well 2 exceeded the 

tap water screening level for bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate of 

4.8 μg/L.

Manganese and arsenic are naturally occurring elements 

in the local bedrock and soils. Mosier and others (1990) report 

the median concentration of manganese in subsurface rock of 

Permian age was 425 parts per million (ppm), or milligrams 

per kilogram and arsenic was 10 ppm. Outcrop samples from 

the Chase, Council Grove, and Admire Groups contained 

a median concentration for manganese of 200 ppm and for 

arsenic of 1.2 ppm (Mosier and others, 1991). B–horizon soil 

samples from Mosier and others (1991) contained a median 

concentration for manganese at 280 ppm and for arsenic of 

5.1 ppm. 

Plant Chemical Analysis and Relation 

to Trace elements in Soils and Ground 

Water

Trace-element concentrations for seven trace elements 

(cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc) 

were totaled to determine total trace element concentration per 

sample (raw data in appendix 4). Plant sample 7J contained 

a total trace element concentration of 190 ppm for the seven 

trace elements (fig. 13). Plant sample 25J contained a total 
24 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

01J

02J

03J

04J

05J

06J

07J

08J 09J 10J

11J

12J

13J 14J

15J

16J

17J

18J

20J 19J

21J

22J

23J

24J

25J

26J

27J

28J

29J

30J

31C

32C

33C

34C

35C

36C

37C

38C

39C

40C

41C

42C

43C

44C

45C

46C

0

96°56'45" 96°56'40" 96°56'35"

35°17'25"

35°17'30"

35°17'35"

Map compiled by U.S. Geological Survey

Aerial image from Absentee Shawnee Tribe, June 2004

USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Projection

North American Datum 1983

0 0 0.025 M .05 0.1 ile

0 8 40 0 160 Meters

EXPLANATION

Total trace-element concentration in parts per million

> 150

100 - 150

50 - 100

< 50

boundary of oilfield-service site

Figure 13. Total trace-element concentrations in plant samples near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006.
Summary 25

trace element concentration of 181 ppm for the seven trace elements. Sample 7J was located near the threading barn and 25J 

was located west of the vehicle maintenance garage. Summary 

statistics for trace-element concentrations in plant samples are 

presented in boxplots on figure 14.

Using plant tissue analyses as a surrogate for soil and 

ground-water contamination is a relatively new analytical 

application. Few data are reported in literature for comparing concentrations in this study to other studies. The previous 

studies that have been published do not sample Johnsongrass 

or Coralberry. Constituent concentrations in Johnsongrass and 

Coralberry were apparently taken up differently in each species (fig. 14). Any comparison of the analyses from this study 

area to similar constituents in other studies would have limited 

application. There also are no screening levels established for 

constituents in plant samples for comparison. 

Correlation coefficients using the Spearman rank sum 

test were calculated for seven trace-element concentrations 

(cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc) 

between (1) plants and shallow soils and (2) plants and deep 

soils for 10 locations where a soil sample was collected near a 

plant sample. Results of the Spearman rank test indicate that 

there was no correlation between the plant and soil sample 

concentrations based on the current sample size and study 

design. However, large zinc concentrations in soil (SS13) and 

in plant material (7J) were measured near the threading barn. 

Zinc concentration in the A horizon at SS13 (150,000 μg/kg) 

was one of the largest in soil samples (appendix 2), and zinc 

concentration in a Johnsongrass sample at 7J (184.5 ppm) was 

greater than in all other plant samples (appendix 4).

The lack of correlation between trace-element concentrations in plants and soils, and plants and ground water indicate 

that plant sampling was not useful as a preliminary tool to 

assess contamination at the study site. The lack of correlation 

could be due to several variables. The sampled plant species 

may not uptake the contaminated constituents as readily as 

other constituents or other species. 

Areas of Contamination

Results of the soil, ground-water, and plant data suggest that the areas of trace-element and SVOC contamination 

are located in the shallow (A–horizon) soils near the threading barn. These contaminants could potentially leach to the 

deeper unconsolidated material and shallow ground water 

over time, and may eventually reach the intermittent creek 

that cuts across the study area. Contaminants in the shallow 

soils will not likely transport to the deeper bedrock aquifer 

(COA) because of the tight mudstone present at the base of the 

unconsolidated material. SVOC contaminants in the Old Well 

may have been caused from previous use of the well or from 

surface contamination. The Old Well could act as a conduit 

for transmitting contaminants from the surface to the bedrock 

aquifer. The presence of phenol in the stream was most likely 

from a source upstream from the study area because there was 

no phenol present in the other ground-water and soil samples 

at the time of sampling. The elevated manganese and arsenic 

concentrations were attributed to the ambient conditions in 

the local soil and bedrock. There was no apparent difference 

in trace-element and SVOC concentrations in ground-water 

samples from December to May.

Summary

The state of Oklahoma has a well-known history of oil 

and gas production beginning in the late 1800s (Oklahoma 

Energy Resources Board, 2006). Oilfield-service sites were an 

integral part of the oil and gas industry and used for storage 

and maintenance of oilfield equipment. The Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma was working to reclaim an oilfieldservice site near Shawnee, Oklahoma and needed to determine 

the nature and extent of contamination to aid clean-up efforts. 

The oilfield service-site contained production storage tanks, 

production pipe, and warehouses and other buildings that were 

used to clean and cut production pipe. Wastes left behind on 

the oilfield-service site in Shawnee, Oklahoma consisted of 

pipes, cuttings from pipe threading, hydraulic fluid, oils, and 

solvents. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma, began 

a reconnaissance study of a site in Pottawatomie County in 

2005 by testing soil, shallow ground water, and plant material 

for the presence of trace elements and semivolatile organic 

compounds (SVOCs). Chemical analysis of plant material at 

the site was investigated as a preliminary tool to determine the 

extent of contamination at the site. 

Thirty soil samples were collected from 15 soil cores during October 2005 and analyzed for trace elements and semivolatile organic compounds. Five small-diameter, polyvinylchloride-cased wells were installed to collect ground-water 

samples. Water samples were collected from the wells during 

December 2005 and May 2006 for analysis of trace elements 

and semivolatile organic compounds. Thirty Johnsongrass 

samples and 16 Coralberry samples were collected during 

September 2005 and analyzed for 53 constituents, including 

trace elements. 

Soil samples SS15–A and SS13–A contained the highest total trace-element concentrations from the study area for 

cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc. 

Soil samples SS13–A and SS4–A contained the highest total 

SVOC concentrations from the study area.

Results from the Wilcoxon rank sum test indicate that the 

trace-element concentrations in soils from the study area are 

not elevated above background soil concentrations, although 

some are elevated above outcropping Central Oklahoma aquifer rock concentrations.

Soil samples SS1–C, SS6–C, and SS7–C exceeded the 

Residential Soil Screening Level for manganese of 

3,200 mg/kg. All other sample values for manganese were less 
26 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006

than the Industrial Indoor and Industrial Outdoor Soil Screening Levels for manganese. Soil sample SS4–A exceeded 

the Residential Soil Screening Level for benzo(a)pyrene of 

0.015 mg/kg. Soil sample SS13–A exceeded the Residential 

Soil Screening Levels for benzo(a)anthracene (0.15 mg/kg), 

benzo(a)pyrene (0.015 mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (0.15 

mg/kg), dibenz(ah)anthracene (0.015 mg/kg),

and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (0.15 mg/kg). Soil sample 

SS13–A exceeded the Industrial Indoor Soil Screening Levels 

for benzo(a)anthracene (7.8 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (0.78 

mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (7.8 mg/kg), and dibenz(ah)

anthracene (0.78 mg/kg). Soil sample SS13–A exceeded the 

Industrial Outdoor Soil Screening Levels for benzo(a)anthracene (2.3 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (0.23 mg/kg), benzo(b)

fluoranthene (2.3 mg/kg), dibenz(ah)anthracene (0.23 mg/kg), 

and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (2.3 mg/kg). 

Most of the trace-element and SVOC concentrations 

from the ground-water samples collected in December and 

May were near the laboratory reporting level. Although, the 

Old Well contained higher zinc concentrations in both the 

December and May samples. The casing for the Old Well 

was made of steel and water in the well was not purged prior 

to sampling, and some of these trace elements could have 

leached from the casing into the well water. SW 3 contained 

an estimated value of 37.8 μg/L for phenol. 

The December sample from SW 3 exceeded the tap water 

screening level for manganese of 1,700 μg/L. All wells for 

both December and May exceeded the tap water screening 

level for arsenic of 0.045 μg/L. The December sample from 

Well 2 exceeded the tap water screening level for bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate of 4.8 μg/L.

Plant samples 7J and 25J contained the highest total 

trace-element concentrations for cadmium, chromium, copper, 

lead, nickel, silver, and zinc. Results of the Spearman rank test 

indicate that there was no correlation between the plant and 

soil concentrations based on the current sample size and study 

design. Large zinc concentrations in soil and in plant material 

were measured near the threading barn. The lack of correlation between trace-element concentrations in plants and soils, 

and plants and ground water indicate that plant sampling was 

not useful as a preliminary tool to assess contamination at the 

study site. 

Results of the soil, ground-water, and plant data indicate 

that the areas of trace-element and SVOC contamination are 

located in the shallow (A–horizon) soils near the threading barn. These contaminants could potentially leach to the 

deeper unconsolidated material and shallow ground water 

over time, and may eventually reach the intermittent creek 

that cuts across the study area. Contaminants in the shallow 

soils will not likely transport to the deeper bedrock aquifer 

(COA) because of the tight mudstone present at the base of the 

unconsolidated material. SVOC contaminants in the Old Well 

may have been caused from previous use of the well or from 

surface contamination. The Old Well could act as a conduit 

for transmitting contaminants from the surface to the bedrock 

aquifer. The presence of phenol in the stream was most likely 

from a source upstream from the study area because there was 

no phenol present in the other ground-water and soil samples 

at the time of sampling. The elevated manganese and arsenic 

concentrations were attributed to the ambient conditions in 

the local soil and bedrock. There was no obvious difference in 

ground-water trace-element detections between December and 

May.

Selected References

Bingham, R.H., and Moore, R.L., 1975, Reconnaissance of the 

water resources of the Oklahoma City quadrangle, Central 

Oklahoma: Oklahoma Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas 

HA–4, 4 sheets, scale 1:250,000.

Childress, C.J.O., Foreman, W.T., Connor, B.F., and Maloney, T.J., 1999, New reporting procedures based on longterm method detection levels and some considerations for 

interpretations of water-quality data provided by the U.S. 

Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory: U.S. 

Geological Survey Open-File Report 99–193, 19 p.

Christenson, S.C., Morton, R.B., and Messander, B.A., 1992, 

Hydrogeologic maps of the Central Oklahoma aquifer, 

Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA–724, 3 sheets, scale 1:250,000.

Erdman, J.A., and Christenson, Scott, 2000, Elements in Cottonwood Trees as an Indicator of Ground Water Contaminated by Landfill Leachate: Ground Water Monitoring & 

Remediation, v. 20, no. 1, p.120–126.

Erdman, J.A., Vradenburg, L.A., and Smith, C.S., 2003, 

Willow-Leaf Analysis Determines Extent of Mine Contamination Plume on the Willow Creek Floodplain, Creede, 

Colorado: accessed January 26, 2005, at http://www.

willowcreede.org/waterquality/Willow%20Final.pdf

Helsel, D.R., 2005, Nondetects and data analysis: Statistics for 

censored environmental data: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,

250 p.

Helsel, D.R., and Hirsch, R.M., 2002, Statistical methods in 

water resources: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of 

Water-Resources Investigations, Book 4, Chapter A3. 

Howarth, R.J., and Govett, G.J.S., 1983, Handbook of Exploration Geochemistry: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, v. 2, p. 64.

Meinzer, O.E., 1923, Outline of ground-water hydrology with 

definitions: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 

494, 71 p.

Meinzer, O.E., 1927, Plants as indicators of ground water: 

U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 577, 95 p.
Selected References 27

Mosier, E.L., Briggs, P.H., Crock, J.G., Kennedy, K.R., McKown, D.M., Vaughn, R.B., and Welsch, E.P., 1990, Analyses 

of subsurface Permian rock samples from the Central Oklahoma aquifer: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 

90–456, 58 p.

Mosier, E.L., Bullock, J.H., Jr., Fey, D.L., Kennedy, K.R., 

McKown, D.M., Vaughn, R.B., and Welsch, E.P., 1991, 

Elemental composition of surficial materials from Central Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 

91–442A, 62 p.

Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 2002, Oklahoma Annual 

Climate Summary, 2004 Board of Regents of the University 

of Oklahoma: accessed March 20, 2006, at http://climate.

ocs.ou.edu/annual_summary.html

Oklahoma Climatological Survey, 2006, Mesonet Climatological Data Summary for Shawnee Station, Board of Regents 

of the University of Oklahoma: accessed January 16, 2007, 

at http://www.mesonet.ou.edu/public/summary.html

Oklahoma Energy Resources Board, 2006, Approximately 

750,000 oil wells have been drilled in Oklahoma: accessed 

March 20, 2006, at http://www.oerb.com/industry/history_3.

asp

Parkhurst, D.L, Christenson, S.C., and Breit, G.N., 1996, 

Ground-water quality assessment of the central Oklahoma 

Aquifer, Oklahoma; geochemical and geohydrologic 

investigations: U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 

2357–C, 101 p.

Rose, A.W., Hawkes, H.E., and Webb, J.S., 1979, Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration (2d ed.): San Diego, California, 

Academic Press Inc., chap. 17, 657 p.

Soil Conservation Service, 1977, Soil Survey of Pottawatomie 

County, Oklahoma, 118 p.

Smith, David B., Cannon, William F., Woodruff, Laurel G., 

Garrett, Robert G., Klassen, Rodney, Kilburn, James E., 

Horton, John D., King, Harley D., Goldhaber, Martin B., 

Morrison, Jean M., 2005, Major- and trace-element concentrations in soils from two continental-scale transects of the 

United States and Canada: U.S. Geological Survey OpenFile Report 2005–1253, 22 p.

Tortorelli, R.L., 2004, Estimated freshwater withdrawals in 

Oklahoma, 2000: U.S. Geological Survey: accessed January 

11, 2007, at http://ok.water.usgs.gov/wateruse/wateruse00.

html

U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1993, Soil Survey Manual, 

Handbook No. 18, p. 138.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2007, Natural Resources 

Conservation Service Plants Database: accessed January 11, 

2007, at http://plants.usda.gov/index.html

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1983, Methods for 

chemical analysis of water and wastes: Cincinnati, Ohio,

EPA–600/4–79–020, variable pagination.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986 (revised December 1996), Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods: Washington, D.C., U.S. Government 

Printing Office, EPA–SW–846, variable pagination. 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2006 (revised December, 22, 2006), Region 6 Human Health Medium-Specific 

Screening Levels 2007: accessed April 12, 2007, 

at http://www.epa.gov/Arkansas/6pd/rcra_c/pd-n/screen.htm

Prepared by Lawrence Publishing Service Center.

Edited by Lyn Osburn

Layout and design by Lyn Osburn.

For more information concerning the research 

described in this report, contact:

U.S. Geological Survey

202 NW 66th St., Bldg. 7

Oklahoma City, OK 73116

(405) 810-4400

http://ok.water.usgs.gov
28 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006
Appendixes 29

Appendixes
30 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006
Appendixes 31

Appendix 1. Quality control data

Quality-control samples were collected and analyzed to 

evaluate the degree of accuracy, precision, and bias of environmental samples. Quality control for the plant samples consisted of six replicate environmental samples. Quality control 

for the soil samples consisted of three replicate environmental samples. Quality control for the ground-water samples 

consisted of one equipment blank, one field blank, and two 

replicate environmental samples. 

Precision was calculated as the relative percent difference (RPD) between the initial environmental sample and the 

replicate environmental sample by equation 1:

RPD = | C1 – C2 | / ((C1 + C2)/2) * 100 (1)

where 

C1 = initial environmental sample value;

C2 = replicate environmental sample value

Bias, where evident, was calculated as the percent difference (PD) between the initial environmental sample and the 

replicate environmental sample by equation 2:

PD = [(C1 – C2 )/ C1)] * 100 (2)

where 

C1 = initial environmental sample value;

C2 = replicate environmental sample value

Three replicate soil samples were collected by filling a 

second jar from the same core zone as the initial soil sample 

(table 4). The RPD values for the soil samples were variable. 

There appeared to be some bias in the replicate sample results. 

The trace-element results for replicate SS6-CR showed that 

75 percent of detections were at least 20 percent greater in the 

replicate sample. The semivolatile organic compound results 

for replicate SS6-CR showed that all detections were at least 

20 percent greater in the replicate sample. This low bias may 

be caused by variations between the environmental sampling 

method and the replicate sampling method, or variations in the 

soil itself. The trace-element results for replicate SS12-B1R 

showed most detections were greater in the replicate and 30 

percent of detections were within 20 percent of the environmental sample. The semivolatile organic compound results for 

replicate SS12-B1R showed that all detections were at least 

20 percent different. The trace-element results for replicate 

SS14-BR showed that about 30 percent of detections were 

greater than 20 percent different. The semivolatile organic 

compound results for replicate SS14-BR showed that 50 

percent of detections matched concentrations in the environmental sample and the remaining 50 percent were within 20 

percent of the environmental sample, which suggests that 

the replicate was in good agreement with the environmental 

sample. 

Two replicate ground-water samples were collected in 

the exact same manner that the initial environmental sample 

was collected (table 5). The RPD values for the ground-water 

samples were less than or equal to 5 percent for most trace 

elements detected at concentrations greater than the reporting 

level. Only copper (14 percent) and zinc (9 percent) concentrations had relative percent differences greater than 5 percent. 

Replicate ground-water samples suggest that the sampling and 

analysis of trace elements and semivolatile organic compounds 

in this investigation were repeatable and free from large 

sources of error. 

Six replicate plant samples were collected by filling a 

second cloth sample bag with plant material from the same 

plant sample location as the initial plant sample (table 6). 

Roughly 40 to 50 percent of detected trace elements had 

RPDs greater than 20 percent. The poor agreement of replicate 

samples with environmental samples was probably due to a 

number of factors including the natural variability in concentrations in plant tissues and the difficulty of collecting true 

replicate plant samples, and may be because most trace-element detections were near the laboratory reporting level. 

The equipment blank was used to determine if the environmental ground-water samples were contaminated by the 

well screen and sampling equipment. The equipment blank 

was prepared in the laboratory prior to collecting environmental samples, by processing quality-assured high purity organic 

blank water through a prepacked well screen and sampling 

equipment in the same manner that the environmental samples 

were collected. Aluminum was found in high concentrations 

(35.9 μg/L) in the equipment blank. Zinc (0.774 μg/L) and 

copper (0.855 μg/L) were detected in concentrations comparable to those found in environmental samples. Molybdenum, 

manganese, nickel, and barium also were detected in the 

equipment blank, but in concentrations less than the minimum 

concentration detected in environmental samples. The equipment blank also had semivolatile organic compound detections 

near the laboratory reporting level, specifically di-n-butyl 

phthalate, isophorone, phenol, and naphthalene.

The field blank was used to determine if environmental 

ground-water samples were contaminated during the sampling 

process in the field. The field blank was prepared in the field 

by processing quality-assured high purity organic blank water 

through the sampling equipment in the same manner that the 

environmental samples were collected. Aluminum was found 

in high concentrations (54.8 μg/L) in the field blank. Aluminum concentrations of most environmental water samples 

were less than the reporting level. Chromium was detected 

in concentrations (0.2 μg/L) comparable to those found in 

environmental samples. Chromium, nickel, manganese, and 

barium also were detected in the field blank, but in concentrations less than the minimum concentration detected in environmental samples. 

The aluminum concentration in the field blank was 

greater than the aluminum concentration in the equipment 

blank, which indicate that the aluminum likely was leaching 

from the sand prepacked well screen during well development. 

According to analysis of blank and replicate water samples, 

prepack materials do not appear to be substantial sources of 

other trace elements and semivolatile organic compounds 

detected in sampled ground-water in this investigation. 
32 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006. [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; R, replicate sample; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contami- nation; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram] Medium Local identifier Date collected % Moisture (%) Specific conductance (μmhos/cm) pH (std units) Aluminum (mg/kg) Berylium (mg/kg) Antimony (μg/kg) Arsenic (μg/kg) soil SS6-C 10/21/2005 25.0 J99 8.0 8,100 1.2 <270 5,800 soil SS6-CR 10/21/2005 19.0 J90 8.2 8,300 0.89 <250 4,200 soil SS12-B1 10/26/2005 9.8 J54 8.0 56,000 3.4 <220 1,600 soil SS12-B1R 10/26/2005 9.6 J60 8.0 10,000 0.61 <220 2,100 soil SS14-B 10/26/2005 21.0 J82 7.5 29,000 1.2 <250 2,800 soil SS14-BR 10/26/2005 23.0 J54 7.4 26,000 0.82 <260 2,100 Medium Local identifier Barium (μg/kg) Beryllium (μg/kg) Cadmium (μg/kg) Chromium (μg/kg) Cobalt (μg/kg) Copper (μg/kg) Lead (μg/kg) Manganese (μg/kg) soil SS6-C 1,100,000 780 E57 18,000 13,000 10,000 11,000 6,400,000 soil SS6-CR 610,000 730 E40 16,000 10,000 7,800 8,400 3,700,000 soil SS12-B1 280,000 660 110 14,000 J5,500 8,500 8,400 J340,000 soil SS12-B1R 210,000 690 E94 14,000 J6,100 8,100 7,900 610,000 soil SS14-B 59,000 1,200 E43 26,000 J4,500 6,200 8,500 J100,000 soil SS14-BR 57,000 930 E43 24,000 J4200 10,000 9,300 92,000 Medium Local identifier Molybdenum (μg/kg) Nickel (μg/kg) Selenium (μg/kg) Silver (μg/kg) Thallium (μg/kg) Tin (μg/kg) Vanadium (μg/kg) Zinc (μg/kg) soil SS6-C 280 21,000 1,100 E32 E47 <3,300 62,000 51,000 soil SS6-CR E220 16,000 820 E34 E43 <3,100 49,000 36,000 soil SS12-B1 E88 10,000 550 E74 120 E82 23,000 28,000 soil SS12-B1R E100 10,000 E520 E69 120 <2,800 26,000 26,000 soil SS14-B E240 13,000 E580 E89 260 E34 41,000 31,000

soil SS14-BR E200 11,000 E620 E110 260 <3,300 35,000 31,000
Appendixes 33

Table 4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; R, replicate sample; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram]

Medium Local identifier Date collected 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol (μg/kg) 2,4,6-Tribromophenol surrogate (μg/kg) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (μg/kg) 2,4-Dichlorophenol (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C 10/21/2005 <440 4,200 <440 <440soil SS6-CR 10/21/2005 <410 2,800 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 10/26/2005 <370 2,200 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R 10/26/2005 <370 2,700 <370 <370soil SS14-B 10/26/2005 <420 3,200 <420 <420soil SS14-BR 10/26/2005 <430 3,200 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier 2,4-Dimethylphenol (μg/kg) 2,4-Dinitrophenol (μg/kg) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (μg/kg) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (μg/kg) 2-Chloro naphtha- lene (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 <2,100 <440 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <410 <2,000 <410 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 <370 <1,800 <370 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 <1,800 <370 <370 <370soil SS14-B <420 <2,000 <420 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <430 <2,100 <430 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier 2-Chlorophenol (μg/kg) 2-Fluorobiphenyl surrogate (μg/kg) 2-Fluorophenol (μg/kg) 2-Methylnaphthalene (μg/kg) 2-Methylphenol (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 2,800 4,300 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <410 2,100 3,400 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 <370 1,700 2,900 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 2,200 3,700 <370 <370soil SS14-B <420 2,300 4,300 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <430 2,400 4,200 <430 <430
34 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; R, replicate sample; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contami- nation; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram] Medium Local identifier Date collected 2-Nitroaniline

(μg/kg)

2-Nitrophenol

(μg/kg)

3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine

(μg/kg)

3-Nitroaniline

(μg/kg)

soil SS6-C 10/21/2005 <2,100 <440 <880 <2,100soil SS6-CR 10/21/2005 <2,000 <410 <820 <2,000soil SS12-B1 10/26/2005 <1,800 <370 <730 <1,800soil SS12-B1R 10/26/2005 <1,800 <370 <730 <1,800soil SS14-B 10/26/2005 <2,000 <420 <840 <2,000soil SS14-BR 10/26/2005 <2,100 <430 <860 <2,100

Medium Local identifier 4,6-Dinitro- 2-methylphenol 

(μg/kg)

4-Bromophenyl 

phenyl ether

(μg/kg)

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

(μg/kg)

4-Chloroaniline (μg/

kg)

4-Chlorophenyl 

phenyl ether 

(μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <2,100 <440 <440 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <2,000 <410 <410 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 <1,800 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <1,800 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS14-B <2,000 <420 <420 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <2,100 <430 <430 <430 <430soil SS14-B <2,000 <420 <420 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <2,100 <430 <430 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier 4-Methylphenol

(μg/kg)

4-Nitroaniline

(μg/kg)

4-Nitrophenol

(μg/kg)

Acenaphthene

(μg/kg)

Acenaphthylene

(μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 <2,100 <2,100 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <410 <2,000 <2,000 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 <370 <1,800 <1,800 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 <1,800 <1,800 <370 <370soil SS14-B <420 <2,000 <2,000 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <430 <2,100 <2,100 <430 <430
Appendixes 35

Table 4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; R, replicate sample; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram]

Medium Local identifier Date collected Acetophenone (μg/kg) Anthracene (μg/kg) Atrazine (μg/kg) Benzo(a)anthracene (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440soil SS6-CR 10/21/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS14-B 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420soil SS14-BR 10/26/2005 <430 <430 <430 <430

Medium Local identiifier Benzo(a)pyrene (μg/kg) Benzo(b)fluoranthene (μg/kg) Benzo(ghi)perylene (μg/kg) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (μg/kg) bis(2-Chloroethoxy) methane (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 <440 <440 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <410 <410 <410 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS14-B <420 <420 <420 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <430 <430 <430 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier bis(2-Chloro ethyl) ether (μg/kg) bis(2-Chloro isopropyl) ether (μg/kg) bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (μg/kg) Butyl benzyl phthalate (μg/kg) Caprolactam (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 <440 <440 <440 <2,100soil SS6-CR <410 <410 <410 <410 <2,000soil SS12-B1 <370 <370 E100 <370 <1,800soil SS12-B1R <370 <370 <370 <370 <1,800soil SS14-B <420 <420 <420 <420 <2,000soil SS14-BR <430 <430 <430 <430 <2,100
36 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; R, replicate sample; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram] Medium Local identifier Date collected Carbazole 

(μg/kg)

Chrysene 

(μg/kg)

Di-n-butyl phthalate 

(μg/kg)

Di-n-octyl phthalate 

(μg/kg)

soil SS6-C 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440soil SS6-CR 10/21/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS14-B 10/26/2005 <390 <420 <420 <420soil SS14-BR 10/26/2005 <430 <430 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier Dibenz (a,h)anthracene 

(μg/kg)

Dibenzofuran 

(μg/kg)

Diethyl phthalate 

(μg/kg)

Dimethyl phthalate 

(μg/kg)

Fluoranthene 

(μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 <440 <880 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <410 <410 <820 <410 <410soil SS12-B1 <370 <370 <730 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 <370 <730 <370 <370soil SS14-B <420 <420 <840 <420 <420soil SS14-BR <430 <430 <860 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier Fluorene 

(μg/kg)

Hexachlorobenzene 

(μg/kg)

Hexachloro 

butadiene 

(μg/kg)

Hexachloro 

cyclopentadiene 

(μg/kg)

Hexachloroethane 

(μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 <440 <440 <2,100 <440soil SS6-CR <410 <410 <410 <2,000 <410soil SS12-B1 <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <370soil SS14-B <420 <420 <420 <2,000 <420soil SS14-BR <430 <430 <430 <2,100 <430
Appendixes 37

Table 4. Quality-control soil samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; R, replicate sample; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram]

Medium Local identifier Date collected Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (μg/kg) N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine (μg/kg) N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (μg/kg) Naphthalene (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440soil SS6-CR 10/21/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410

soil SS12-B1 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370

soil SS12-B1R 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370soil SS14-B 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420

soil SS14-BR 10/26/2005 <430 <430 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier Nitrobenzene (μg/kg) Nitrobenzene-d5 surrogate (μg/kg) Penta chlorophenol (μg/kg) Phenanthrene (μg/kg) Phenol (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C <440 2,900 <2,100 <440 <440soil SS6-CR <410 2,200 <2,000 <410 <410

soil SS12-B1 <370 1,900 <1,800 <370 <370soil SS12-B1R <370 2,400 <1,800 <370 <370

soil SS14-B <420 2,700 <2,000 <420 <420

soil SS14-BR <430 2,700 <2,100 <430 <430

Medium Local identifier Phenol-d5 surrogate (μg/kg) Pyrene (μg/kg) Terphenyl-d14 surrogate (μg/kg)

soil SS6-C 4,400 <440 3,700

soil SS6-CR 3,400 <410 2,600soil SS12-B1 3,000 <370 2,100soil SS12-B1R 3,700 <370 2,700soil SS14-B 4,300 <420 2,900soil SS14-BR 4,200 <430 2,900
38 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006. [R, replicate sample; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Medium Local identifier Date collected Aluminum 

(μg/L)

Antimony 

(μg/L)

Arsenic

(μg/L)

Barium 

(μg/L)

Beryllium 

(μg/L)

Cadmium 

(μg/L)

Chromium 

(μg/L)

Cobalt 

(μg/L)

ground water well 2 12/28/2005 4 <0.20 0.28 274 E0.04 <0.04 E0.03 0.974

ground water Well 4 12/28/2005 <3 <0.40 0.26 120 E0.06 <0.08 0.47 0.290

ground water Well 2 R 12/28/2005 <2 <0.20 0.29 272 <0.06 <0.04 E0.03 1.02

ground water Well 4 R 12/28/2005 <3 <0.40 0.26 120 <0.12 <0.08 0.49 0.290

blank water Equipment 07/25/2005 36 <0.20 <2

M <0.06 <0.04 <0.8 E0.008

blank water Field 12/21/2005 55 <0.20 <0.12

M <0.06 <0.04 0.20 <0.040

Medium Local identifier Copper 

(μg/L)

Lead 

(μg/L)

Manganese 

(μg/L)

Molybdenum 

(μg/L)

Nickel 

(μg/L)

Selenium 

(μg/L)

Silver 

(μg/L)

Zinc

 (μg/L)

Uranium 

(natural) 

(μg/L)

ground water Well 2 0.8 <0.08 246 0.9 5.56 E0.05 <0.2 0.9 4.33

ground water Well 4 1.2 <0.16 29.9 E0.5 4.23 0.56 E0.3 <1.2 6.72

ground water Well 2 R 0.8 <0.08 258 0.9 5.54 E0.04 <0.2 0.9 4.29

ground water Well 4 R 1.0 <0.16 28.4 E0.5 4.05 0.57 E0.2 E0.6 6.88

blank water Equipment 0.9 <0.08 0.6 E0.2 E.05 <3 <0.2 0.8 0.04

blank water Field <0.4 <0.08 E0.1 <0.4 E.04 <0.08 <0.2 <0.6 <0.04
Appendixes 39

Table 5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[R, replicate sample; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Medium Local identifier Date collected 1,2-Diphenyl hydrazine (μg/L) 2,4,6-Tribromophe- nol surrogate (% recovery) 2,4,6-Trichlo- rophenol (μg/L) 2,4-Dichlorophenol (μg/L)

ground water well 2 12/28/2005 <2 104 <1 <2ground water Well 4 12/28/2005 <2 77.1 <1 <2ground water Well 2 R 12/28/2005 <2 61.7 <1 <2ground water Well 4 R 12/28/2005 <2 45.4 <1 <2blank water Equipment 07/25/2005 <2 89.9 <1 <2blank water Field 12/21/2005 <2 32.4 <1 <2

Medium Local identifier 2,4-Dimethylphe- nol (μg/L) 2,4-Dinitrop- henol (μg/L) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (μg/L) 2,6-Dinitrotol- uene (μg/L) 2-Chloro naphthalene (μg/L)

ground water well 2 <2 <3 <1 <2 <1ground water Well 4 <2 <3 <1 <2 <1ground water Well 2 R <2 <3 <1 <2 <1ground water Well 4 R <2 <3 <1 <2 <1blank water Equipment <2 <3 <1 <2 <1blank water Field <2 <3 <1 <2 <1

Medium Local identifier 2-Chlorophenol (μg/L) 2-Methyl-4,6- dinitrophenol (μg/L) 2-Nitrophenol (μg/L) 3,3’-Dichloro benzidine (μg/L) 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether (μg/L)

ground water well 2 <1 <2 <1 <0.9 <2ground water Well 4 <1 <2 <1 <0.9 <2ground water Well 2 R <1 <2 <1 <0.9 <2ground water Well 4 R <1 <2 <1 <0.9 <2blank water Equipment <1 <2 <1 <0.9 <2blank water Field <1 <2 <1 <0.9 <2
40 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [R, replicate sample; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Medium Local identifier Date collected 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 

(μg/L)

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 

(μg/L)

4-Nitrophenol 

(μg/L)

9H-Fluorene 

(μg/L)

ground water well 2 12/28/2005 <2 <1 <2 <1ground water Well 4 12/28/2005 <2 <1 <2 <1ground water Well 2 R 12/28/2005 <2 <1 <2 <1ground water Well 4 R 12/28/2005 <2 <1 <2 <1blank water Equipment 07/25/2005 <2 <1 <2 <1blank water Field 12/21/2005 <2 <1 <2 <1

Medium Local identifier Acenaphthene 

(μg/L)

Acenaphthylene 

(μg/L)

Anthracene 

(μg/L)

Benzidine 

(μg/L)

Benzo[a]anthracene 

(μg/L)

ground water well 2 <2 <2 <2 <1,000 <2ground water Well 4 <2 <2 <2 <1,000 <2ground water Well 2 R <2 <2 <2 <1000 <2ground water Well 4 R <2 <2 <2 <1000 <2blank water Equipment <2 <2 <2 ND <2blank water Field <2 <2 <2 <1000 <2

Medium Local identifier Benzo[a]pyrene 

(μg/L)

Benzo[b]fluoranthene 

(μg/L)

Benzo[ghi]perylene

(μg/L)

Benzo[k]fluoranthene

(μg/L)

Benzyl n-butyl phthalate 

(μg/L)

ground water well 2 <1 <2 <2 <1 <2ground water Well 4 <1 <2 <2 <1 <2ground water Well 2 R

M

M

M

M <2

ground water Well 4 R <1 <2 <2 <1 <2blank water Equipment <1 <2 <2 <1 <2blank water Field <1 <2 <2 <1 <2
Appendixes 41

Table 5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[R, replicate sample; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Medium Local identifier Date collected Bis(2-chloro ethoxy)methane (μg/L) Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether (μg/L) Bis(2-chloro isopropyl) ether (μg/L) Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (μg/L)

ground water well 2 12/28/2005 <1 <1 <1 E10ground water Well 4 12/28/2005 <1 <1 <1 <2ground water Well 2 R 12/28/2005 <1 <1 <1 E5ground water Well 4 R 12/28/2005 <1 <1 <1 <2blank water Equipment 07/25/2005 <1 <1 <1 <2blank water Field 12/21/2005 <1 <1 <1 <2

Medium Local identifier Chrysene (μg/L) Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (μg/L) Diethyl phthalate (μg/L) Dimethyl phthalate (μg/L) Di-n-butyl phthalate (μg/L)

ground water well 2 <1 <2 M M <2ground water Well 4 <1 <2 M M <2ground water Well 2 R M <2 M M <2ground water Well 4 R <1 <2 M <1 <2blank water Equipment <1 <2 <2 <1 E1blank water Field <1 <2 <2 <1 <2

Medium Local identifier Di-n-octyl phthalate (μg/L) Fluoranthene (μg/L) Hexachlorobenzene (μg/L) Hexachloro cyclopentadiene (μg/L) Indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene (μg/L)

ground water well 2 <2 <1 <1 <1 <2ground water Well 4 <2 <1 <1 <1 <2ground water Well 2 R <2 M <1 <1 Mground water Well 4 R <2 <1 <1 <1 <2blank water Equipment <2 <1 <1 <1 <2blank water Field <2 <1 <1 <1 <2
42 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [R, replicate sample; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, pres- ence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Medium Local identifier Date collected Isophorone (μg/L) Nitrobenzene (μg/L) N-Nitrosodimethylamine 

(μg/L)

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 

(μg/L)

ground water well 2 12/28/2005

M <1 <2 <2

ground water Well 4 12/28/2005

M <1 <2 <2

ground water Well 2 R 12/28/2005

M <1 <2 <2

ground water Well 4 R 12/28/2005 <2 <1 <2 <2blank water Equipment 07/25/2005

M <1 <2 <2

blank water Field 12/21/2005 <2 <1 <2 <2

Medium Local identifier N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 

(μg/L)

Pentachlorophenol 

(μg/L) Phenanthrene (μg/L) Phenol 

(μg/L)

Phenol-d5 surrogate 

(% recovery)

ground water well 2 <2 <2 <1 <3.5 67.7ground water Well 4 <2 <2 <1 <3.5 48.2ground water Well 2 R <2 <2 <1 <3.5 33.2ground water Well 4 R <2 <2 <1 <1.6 34.9blank water Equipment <2 <2 <1 E0.3 63.6blank water Field <2 <2 <1 <3.5 21.0

Medium Local identifier Pyrene 

(μg/L)

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 

(μg/L)

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 

(μg/L)

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 

(μg/L)

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 

(μg/L)

ground water well 2 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1ground water Well 4 <2 <1 <2 <1 <1ground water Well 2 R

M <1 <2 <1 <1

ground water Well 4 R <2 <1 <2 <1 <1blank water Equipment <2 <1 <2 <1 <1blank water Field <2 <1 <2 <1 <1
Appendixes 43

Table 5. Quality-control ground-water samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[R, replicate sample; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Medium Local identifier Date collected Hexachlorobutadiene (μg/L) Hexachloroethane (μg/L) Naphthalene (μg/L) 2-Fluorobiphenyl surrogate (% recovery)

ground water well 2 12/28/2005 <1 <2 <2 85ground water Well 4 12/28/2005 <1 <2 <2 76ground water Well 2 R 12/28/2005 <1 <2 <2 77ground water Well 4 R 12/28/2005 <1 <2 <2 38blank water Equipment 07/25/2005 <1 <2 M 99blank water Field 12/21/2005 <1 <2 <2 24

Medium Local identifier Nitrobenzene-d5 surrogate (% recovery) Terphenyl-d14 surrogate (% recovery)

ground water well 2 94 78ground water Well 4 89 72ground water Well 2 R 90 64ground water Well 4 R 47 35blank water Equipment 100 94blank water Field 32 29
44 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 6. Quality-control plant samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006. [all values reported as dry weight, R, replicate sample; J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Medium Local identifier Date collected Aluminum (%) Antimony (ppm) Arsenic (ppm) Barium (ppm) Beryllium (ppm) Bismuth (ppm) Boron (ppm) Cadmium (ppm) Calcium (%) Cerium (ppm) plant 3 J 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.08 0.2 25.5 <0.1 <0.02 11 0.33 0.33 0.03 plant 3 JR 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.1 <0.1 24.4 <0.1 <0.02 7 0.62 0.3 0.03 plant 19 J 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.17 0.3 56.7 <0.1 <0.02 5 0.42 0.83 0.03 plant 19 JR 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.18 0.1 48.9 <0.1 <0.02 4 0.31 0.66 0.01 plant 25 J 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.15 <0.1 52.6 <0.1 <0.02 6 0.13 0.75 0.03 plant 25 JR 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.07 0.1 66.9 <0.1 <0.02 5 0.14 0.9 0.02 plant 31 C 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.3 105.4 <0.1 <0.02 57 0.08 1.3 0.04 plant 31 CR 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.1 0.4 109.7 <0.1 <0.02 61 0.07 1.39 0.04 plant 42 C 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.2 123.2 <0.1 <0.02 86 0.12 1.32 0.07 plant 42 CR 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.12 0.1 120.5 <0.1 0.02 79 0.11 1.28 0.06 plant 44 C 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.1 132.1 <0.1 <0.02 85 0.11 1.75 0.08 plant 44 CR 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.16 0.5 143.6 <0.1 <0.02 93 0.15 1.93 0.09 Medium Local identifier Cesium (ppm) Chromium (ppm) Cobalt (ppm) Copper (ppm) Gallium (ppm) Germanium (ppm) Gold (ppb) Hafnium (ppm) Indium (ppm) Iron (%) plant 3 J 0.007 2.3 0.06 4.46 <0.1 0.11 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.009 plant 3 JR 0.006 2.1 0.02 4.75 <0.1 0.12 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.006 plant 19 J <0.005 2.1 0.05 3 <0.1 0.08 0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.006 plant 19 JR <0.005 2 0.04 3.7 <0.1 0.08 0.5 <0.001 <0.02 0.005 plant 25 J 0.006 2.3 0.04 4.63 <0.1 0.1 0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.013 plant 25 JR 0.006 2.2 0.03 4.33 <0.1 0.08 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.01 plant 31 C 0.012 2.3 0.02 7.32 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.008 plant 31 CR 0.009 2.4 0.02 6.75 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.006

plant 42 C 0.009 2.6 0.03 7.85 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.009plant 42 CR 0.011 2.3 0.02 6.63 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.007plant 44 C 0.01 2.2 0.03 7.82 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.009plant 44 CR 0.008 2.4 0.05 7.69 <0.1 0.03 0.3 <0.001 <0.02 0.009
Appendixes 45

Table 6. Quality-control plant samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, R, replicate sample; J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Medium Local identifier Date collected Lanthanum (ppm) Lead (ppm) Lithium (ppm) Magnesium (%) Manganese (ppm) Mercury (ppb) Molybdenum (ppm) Nickel (ppm) Niobium (ppm)

plant 3 J 09/20/2005 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.276 53 4 0.6 0.2 <0.01plant 3 JR 09/20/2005 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.313 58 4 0.75 0.2 0.01plant 19 J 09/21/2005 0.01 0.13 0.05 0.263 62 4 0.47 0.2 <0.01plant 19 JR 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.08 0.229 48 6 0.38 0.2 <0.01plant 25 J 09/21/2005 0.01 1.34 0.07 0.255 25 10 0.85 0.3 0.01plant 25 JR 09/21/2005 0.01 0.98 0.11 0.312 23 5 0.87 0.2 <0.01plant 31 C 09/22/2005 0.02 0.11 0.09 0.284 82 20 0.47 0.8 0.01plant 31 CR 09/22/2005 0.03 0.12 0.07 0.275 82 23 0.48 0.6 0.01plant 42 C 09/22/2005 0.05 0.18 0.08 0.287 88 21 0.86 0.7 <0.01plant 42 CR 09/22/2005 0.05 0.32 0.09 0.248 100 26 0.67 0.6 0.01plant 44 C 09/22/2005 0.08 0.14 0.15 0.469 266 44 0.31 1.7 0.01plant 44 CR 09/22/2005 0.09 0.13 0.11 0.456 254 34 0.35 1.3 0.01

Medium Local identifier Palladium (ppb) Phosphorus (%) Platinum (ppb) Potassium (%) Rhenium (ppb) Rubidium (ppm) Scandium (ppm) Selenium (ppm) Silver (ppb) Sodium (%)

plant 3 J <2 0.106 1 1.28 1 5.2 0.2 0.3 3 0.105plant 3 JR <2 0.096 <1 0.93 <1 3.7 0.2 0.3 3 0.074plant 19 J <2 0.201 <1 0.29 <1 1.1 0.2 0.2 4 0.024plant 19 JR <2 0.225 1 0.39 <1 1.1 0.2 0.3 3 0.026plant 25 J <2 0.176 1 0.38 1 1.6 0.1 <0.1 5 0.026plant 25 JR <2 0.154 1 0.2 <1 1.3 0.2 0.1 5 0.017plant 31 C <2 0.139 1 0.86 <1 3.4 0.2 0.3 2 0.037plant 31 CR <2 0.137 <1 0.79 <1 3 0.2 0.4 3 0.037plant 42 C <2 0.096 <1 0.99 <1 1.1 0.2 0.1 4 0.061plant 42 CR <2 0.09 <1 0.66 <1 0.8 0.1 0.2 6 0.052plant 44 C <2 0.11 <1 0.41 <1 1.4 0.2 0.2 17 0.052plant 44 CR <2 0.117 1 0.39 <1 1.1 0.2 0.1 6 0.049
46 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Table 6. Quality-control plant samples collected from oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [all values reported as dry weight, R, replicate sample; J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Medium Local identifier Date collected Strontium (ppm) Sulfur (%) Tantalum (ppm) Tellurium (ppm) Thallium (ppm) Thorium (ppm) Tin (ppm) Titanium (ppm) plant 3 J 09/20/2005 38.5 0.11 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 3 plant 3 JR 09/20/2005 35.2 0.1 0.009 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 3 plant 19 J 09/21/2005 91.1 0.16 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.02 5 plant 19 JR 09/21/2005 74.9 0.14 0.001 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 6 plant 25 J 09/21/2005 116.8 0.12 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 5 plant 25 JR 09/21/2005 141.9 0.1 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.08 4 plant 31 C 09/22/2005 155.3 0.12 0.006 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 4 plant 31 CR 09/22/2005 156.2 0.18 0.066 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.12 4 plant 42 C 09/22/2005 265.5 0.16 0.002 0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 3 plant 42 CR 09/22/2005 262.8 0.08 0.009 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.12 3 plant 44 C 09/22/2005 175.9 0.16 0.003 0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 3 plant 44 CR 09/22/2005 180 0.19 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 4 Medium Local identifier Tungsten (ppm) Uranium (ppm) Vanadium (ppm) Yttrium (ppm) Zinc (ppm) Zirconium (ppm) plant 3 J 0.1 <0.01 <2 0.01 72.1 0.01 plant 3 JR <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.011 79.7 0.01 plant 19 J <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.008 86.5 0.01 plant 19 JR 0.1 <0.01 <2 0.004 89 0.01 plant 25 J <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.008 173.2 0.01 plant 25 JR <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.008 130 0.02 plant 31 C 0.4 0.03 <2 0.016 35.4 0.02 plant 31 CR 0.5 0.05 <2 0.014 27.8 0.02 plant 42 C 0.5 0.03 <2 0.017 92.9 0.01

plant 42 CR 0.5 0.05 <2 0.018 77.7 0.03plant 44 C 0.6 0.05 <2 0.031 33.7 0.02plant 44 CR 0.7 0.06 <2 0.031 42.4 0.02
Appendixes 47

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected % Moisture (%) Specific conductance (μmhos/cm) pH (std units) Aluminum (mg/kg) Beryllium (mg/kg) Antimony (μg/kg) Arsenic (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 12.0 37 8.8 13,000 0.66 <230 1,500SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 19.0 J33 8.4 9,800 1.1 <250 7,100SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 8.7 J16 7.6 10,000 0.57 <220 1,600SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 13.0 J14 8.0 8,700 E0.51 <230 1,700SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 13.0 J26 8.3 13,000 0.6 E10 2,100SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 19.0 J570 6.8 14,000 0.71 <250 2,400SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 7.0 J2.9 6.6 11,000 0.58 E7.7 1,600SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 5.0 J8.2 8.4 3,100 E0.27 <210 670SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 9.8 J8.3 6.5 18,000 0.93 <220 2,900SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 8.9 J42 7.1 14,000 0.77 <220 1,400SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 6.7 J70 7.6 11,000 E0.51 E10 1,700SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 25.0 J99 8.0 8,100 1.2 <270 5,800SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 7.7 J11 8.0 13,000 0.65 <220 3,200SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 21.0 J88 8.7 9,000 1.5 <250 4,500SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 9.1 J9.2 8.2 9,300 E0.47 E11 2,300SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 8.2 J140 7.2 6,800 E0.4 <220 E470SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 13.0 J15 7.4 23,000 0.57 E17 E610SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 15.0 J16 7.2 11,000 0.78 <230 1,900SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 11.0 J390 8.4 18,000 0.68 <230 2,200SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 15.0 J550 7.1 12,000 0.79 <230 2,100SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 15.0 J23 7.8 25,000 1.1 <240 3,000SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 14.0 J78 9.4 16,000 0.76 <230 2,600SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 9.8 J54 8.0 56,000 3.4 <220 1,600SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 12.0 J21 9.2 3,200 E0.17 <230 1,500SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 10.0 J76 8.6 8,400 E0.37 280 15,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 15.0 J940 7.8 18,000 0.78 <230 2,800SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 21.0 J82 7.5 29,000 1.2 <250 2,800SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 12.0 J1,100 7.4 5,400 0.63 <230 2,400SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 16.0 J380 7.7 9,300 E0.45 E29 2,600SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 14.0 J1,000 7.5 13,000 E0.49 <230 E390
48 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Barium 

(μg/kg)

Beryllium 

(μg/kg)

Cadmium 

(μg/kg)

Chromium 

(μg/kg)

Cobalt 

(μg/kg)

Copper 

(μg/kg)

Lead 

(μg/kg)

Manganese 

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 260,000 600 E56 14,000 4,000 6,100 6,800 130,000SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 4,700,000 1,100 130 16,000 47,000 10,000 12,000 15,000,000SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 94,000 500 E47 12,000 4,800 5,600 8,600 230,000SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 99,000 530 E61 12,000 5,600 4,600 7,200 360,000SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 94,000 610 E46 13,000 5,900 6,300 10,000 150,000SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 160,000 750 E95 16,000 6,700 7,500 13,000 140,000SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 110,000 500 E45 11,000 4,000 4,900 7,800 210,000SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 110,000 300 E11 6,200 3,100 5,600 1,600 380,000SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 150,000 820 E25 18,000 4,100 6,700 9,400 200,000SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 190,000 590 E52 16,000 11,000 5,600 9,300 670,000SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 21,000 470 E35 11,000 2,300 4,500 8,900 42,000SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 1,100,000 780 E57 18,000 13,000 10,000 11,000 6,400,000SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 510,000 950 E81 15,000 16,000 7,800 23,000 2,000,000SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 1,200,000 850 E69 17,000 16,000 11,000 11,000 5,500,000SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 58,000 490 E45 13,000 11,000 5,800 15,000 130,000SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 140,000 440 E19 16,000 6,000 13,000 3,000 78,000SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 93,000 570 E30 18,000 J2,800 6,100 5,000 J53,000SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 150,000 650 E34 16,000 J5,500 5,500 6,000 J240,000SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 65,000 740 E34 17,000 J5,200 6,800 9,900 J230,000SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 84,000 720 E36 15,000 J4,900 6,200 6,500 J110,000SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 440,000 1,100 E59 24,000 J8,900 8,700 11,000 J450,000SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 130,000 880 E45 18,000 J6,200 7,300 7,800 J410,000SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 280,000 660 110 14,000 J5,500 8,500 8,400 J340,000SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 210,000 210 E21 4,900 J5,100 8,600 1,700 J520,000SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 260,000 370 830 72,000 J9,200 110,000 220,000 J1,400,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 460,000 890 E31 21,000 J3,800 9,000 8,000 J130,000SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 59,000 1,200 E43 26,000 J4,500 6,200 8,500 J100,000SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 110,000 650 E34 11,000 J13,000 57,000 1,800 J570,000SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 1,100,000 600 1,500 16,000 J4,900 16,000 100,000 J150,000SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 34,000 550 E25 17,000 J3,700 5,900 5,500 J76,000
Appendixes 49

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram;; ND, not determined]

Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Molybdenum (μg/kg) Nickel (μg/kg) Selenium (μg/kg) Silver (μg/kg) Thallium (μg/kg) Tin (μg/kg) Vanadium (μg/kg) Zinc (μg/kg)SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 E67 9,600 E270 E62 120 E30 22,000 26,000SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 2,700 23,000 E450 E41 E69 <3,100 78,000 150,000SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 E150 8,200 E300 E52 E97 E32 22,000 17,000SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 E140 9,500 E280 E50 E89 E26 21,000 16,000SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 E210 8,000 E510 E59 130 E49 24,000 20,000SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 E200 12,000 E490 E85 160 E79 30,000 25,000SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 220 7,600 E320 E45 E92 E29 20,000 17,000SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E120 5,700 E120 E19 E33 E21 17,000 9,200SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E200 11,000 E320 E53 120 <2,800 32,000 22,000SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E140 14,000 E220 E41 E99 E26 22,000 21,000SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 250 5,900 E330 E54 E100 E42 20,000 14,000SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 280 21,000 1,100 E32 E47 <3,300 62,000 51,000SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 610 19,000 E340 E69 180 <2,700 40,000 29,000SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 550 19,000 740 E37 E78 <3,100 59,000 52,000SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 770 8,100 580 E55 E100 E48 22,000 24,000SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 E39 13,000 E200 E33 E78 E25 34,000 17,000SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E120 9,000 E330 E75 150 E150 17,000 23,000SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E85 13,000 E290 E39 E81 <2,900 25,000 22,000SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E100 11,000 E400 E48 130 E31 28,000 23,000SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E120 13,000 E380 E50 E110 E26 34,000 19,000SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E130 18,000 E570 E83 190 <3,000 40,000 42,000SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E150 16,000 E380 E56 E100 <2,900 43,000 23,000SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 E88 10,000 550 E74 120 E82 23,000 28,000SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 260 6,400 E200 <110 E31 <2,800 29,000 15,000SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 20,000 73,000 E470 E100 190 E1700 16,000 150,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E130 12,000 E540 E65 130 E48 35,000 41,000SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E240 13,000 E580 E89 260 E34 41,000 31,000SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E130 19,000 E410 E25 E64 <2,800 35,000 19,000SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 760 11,000 E570 E63 130 E120 22,000 820,000SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 E39 9,200 E230 E62 E100 E27 14,000 20,000
50 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 

(μg/kg)

2,4,6-Tribromophenol 

surrogate (μg/kg)

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 

(μg/kg)

2,4-Dichlorophenol 

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 4,000 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 3,400 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 3,500 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 4,100 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 3,900 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 4,200 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 3,000 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 3,000 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 2,900 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 3,800 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 3,400 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 4,200 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 3,500 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 3,400 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 3,400 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 3,500 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 3,200 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 3,700 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 2,400 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 2,100 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 3,000 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 2,700 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 2,200 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 2,600 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 ND <3,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 2,500 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 3,200 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 2,700 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 ND <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 2,100 <380 <380
Appendixes 51

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local 

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude 

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected 2,4-Dimethylphenol (μg/kg) 2,4-Dinitrophenol (μg/kg) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene (μg/kg) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <2,000 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <2,000 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <2,100 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <1,700 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <2,000 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <1,700 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <1,900 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <18,000 <3,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <2,000 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <38,000 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <1,900 <380 <380
52 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram;; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected 2-Chloronaphthalene

(μg/kg)

2-Chlorophenol

(μg/kg)

2-Fluorobiphenyl

surrogate (μg/kg)

2-Fluorophenol

surrogate (μg/kg)

2-Methylnaphthalene

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 2,600 4,000 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 2,300 3,800 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 2,500 3,700 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 2,700 4,200 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 2,600 4,000 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 2,800 4,000 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 2,200 3,400 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 2,100 3,300 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 1,900 3,000 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 2,500 4,000 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 2,300 3,500 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 2,800 4,300 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 2,400 3,700 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 2,400 3,700 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 2,300 3,500 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 2,400 3,700 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 2,200 3,400 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 2,500 3,900 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 1,800 3,200 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 1,600 2,800 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 2,400 4,200 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 2,100 3,700 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 1,700 2,900 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 2,000 3,400 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <3,700 ND ND <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 1,800 3,300 <390

SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 2,300 4,300 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 2,000 3,600 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 ND ND <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 1,500 2,800 <380
Appendixes 53

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected 2-Methylphenol (μg/kg) 2-Nitroaniline (μg/kg) 2-Nitrophenol (μg/kg) 3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine (μg/kg) 3-Nitroaniline (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <750 <1,800SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <2,000 <410 <810 <2,000SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <720 <1,800SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <760 <1,800SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <760 <1,800SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <2,000 <410 <820 <2,000SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <710 <1,700SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <690 <1,700SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <730 <1,800SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <720 <1,800SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <710 <1,700SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <2,100 <440 <880 <2,100SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <1,700 <360 <710 <1,700SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <2,000 <420 <830 <2,000SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <730 <1,800SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <1,700 <360 <720 <1,700SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <760 <1,800SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <770 <1,900SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <740 <1,800SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <770 <1,900SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <780 <1,900SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <1,900 <380 <770 <1,900SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <730 <1,800SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <750 <1,800SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <18,000 <3,700 <7,400 <18,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <770 <1,900SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <2,000 <420 <840 <2,000SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <750 <1,800SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <38,000 <7,800 <16,000 <38,000SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <1,900 <380 <770 <1,900
54 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamina- tion; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol

(μg/kg)

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether

(μg/kg)

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <1,800 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <2,000 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <1,800 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <1,800 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <1,800 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <2,000 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <1,700 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <1,700 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <1,800 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <1,800 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <1,700 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <2,100 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <1,700 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <2,000 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <1,800 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <1,700 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <1,800 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <1,900 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <1,800 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <1,900 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <1,900 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <1,900 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <1,800 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <1,800 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <18,000 <3,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <1,900 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <2,000 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <1,800 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <38,000 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <1,900 <380 <380
Appendixes 55

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected 4-Chloroaniline (μg/kg) 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether (μg/kg) 4-Methylphenol (μg/kg) 4-Nitroaniline (μg/kg) 4-Nitrophenol (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <380 <1,800 <1,800SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <410 <2,000 <2,000SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <360 <1,800 <1,800SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <1,800 <1,800SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <1,800 <1,800SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <410 <2,000 <2,000SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <1,700 <1,700SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <1,700 <1,700SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <1,800SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <360 <1,800 <1,800SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <350 <1,700 <1,700SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <2,100 <2,100SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <360 <1,700 <1,700SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 <420 <2,000 <2,000SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <1,800 <1,800SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <1,700 <1,700SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <1,800 <1,800SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <1,900 <1,900SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <1,800SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <1,900 <1,900SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <1,900 <1,900SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <1,900 <1,900SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <1,800SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <1,800SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <3,700 <3,700 <18,000 <18,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <390 <1,900 <1,900SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <2,000 <2,000SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <1,800 <1,800SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <38,000 <38,000SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <380 <1,900 <1,900
56 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Acenaphthene

(μg/kg)

Acenaphthylene

(μg/kg)

Acetophenone

(μg/kg)

Anthracene

(μg/kg)

Atrazine

(μg/kg)

Benzo(a)anthracene

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350 E120SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E3,000 <3,700 <3,700 6,100 <3,700 11,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380
Appendixes 57

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined; K, concentration represents both benzo(b)fluoranthene and benzo(k)fluoranthene]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Benzo(a)pyrene (μg/kg) Benzo(b)fluoranthene (μg/kg) Benzo(ghi)perylene (μg/kg) Benzo(k)fluoranthene (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E100 E130 E70 E72SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 7,500 K13,000 <3,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380
58 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamina- tion; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane

(μg/kg)

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether

(μg/kg)

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <3,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <380
Appendixes 59

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (μg/kg) Butyl benzyl phthalate (μg/kg) Caprolactam (μg/kg) Carbazole (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <1,800 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <2,000 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <1,800 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <1,800 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <1,800 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <2,000 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <1,700 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <1,700 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E71 <370 <1,800 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <1,800 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <1,700 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <2,100 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <1,700 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 E74 <420 <2,000 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <1,800 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <1,700 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <1,800 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E230 <390 <1,900 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <1,800 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <1,900 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <1,900 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <1,900 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 E100 <370 <1,800 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <1,800 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <3,700 <18,000 E2,900SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <1,900 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <2,000 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <1,800 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <38,000 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <1,900 <380
60 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Chrysene

(μg/kg)

Di-n-butyl phthalate

(μg/kg)

Di-n-octyl phthalate

(μg/kg)

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

(μg/kg)

Dibenzofuran

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E130 <350 <350 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 9,900 <3,700 <3,700 E2,900 E1,600SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380 <380
Appendixes 61

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Diethyl phthalate (μg/kg) Dimethyl phthalate (μg/kg) Fluoranthene (μg/kg) Fluorene (μg/kg) Hexachlorobenzene (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <750 <380 <380 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <810 <410 <410 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <720 <360 <360 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <760 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <760 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <820 <410 <410 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <710 <350 E210 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <690 <350 <350 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <730 <370 <370 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <720 <360 <360 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <710 <350 <350 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <880 <440 <440 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <710 <360 <360 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <830 <420 <420 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <730 <360 <360 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <720 <360 <360 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <760 <380 <380 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <770 <390 <390 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <740 <370 <370 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <770 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <780 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <770 <380 <380 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <730 <370 <370 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <750 <370 <370 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <7,400 <3,700 28,000 E2,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <770 <390 <390 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <840 <420 <420 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <750 <370 <370 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <16,000 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <770 <380 <380 <380 <380
62 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Hexachlorobutadiene

(μg/kg)

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

(μg/kg)

Hexachloroethane

(μg/kg)

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <2,000 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <2,000 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 E50SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <1,700 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <2,100 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <1,700 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <2,000 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <1,800 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <1,700 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <1,800 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <1,900 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <18,000 <3,700 E3,600SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <1,900 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <2,000 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <1,800 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <38,000 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <1,900 <380 <380
Appendixes 63

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine (μg/kg) N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (μg/kg) Naphthalene (μg/kg) Nitrobenzene (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 <410 <410 <410 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <350 <350 <350 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 <440 <440 <440 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 <360 <360 <360 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <3,700 <3,700 <3,700 <3,700SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <390 <390 <390 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <420 <420 <420 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 <370 <370 <370 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800 <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 <380 <380 <380 <380
64 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Nitrobenzene-d5 surrogate (μg/kg) Pentachlorophenol

(μg/kg)

Phenanthrene

(μg/kg)

Phenol(μg/kg)

Phenol-d5

surrogate (μg/kg)

Pyrene

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 2,700 <1,800 <380 <380 4,100 <380SS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 2,500 <2,000 <410 <410 3,800 <410SS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 2,500 <1,800 <360 <360 3,800 <360SS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 2,800 <1,800 <380 <380 4,200 <380SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 2,700 <1,800 <380 <380 4,100 <380SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 2,700 <2,000 <410 <410 4,200 <410SS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,300 <1,700 E140 <350 3,400 E220SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,200 <1,700 <350 <350 3,300 <350SS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,000 <1,800 <370 <370 3,000 <370SS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,600 <1,800 <360 <360 4,000 <360SS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 2,400 <1,700 <350 <350 3,500 <350SS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 2,900 <2,100 <440 <440 4,400 <440SS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 2,500 <1,700 <360 <360 3,800 <360SS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 2,500 <2,000 <420 <420 3,800 <420SS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 2,300 <1,800 <360 <360 3,500 <360SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 2,500 <1,700 <360 <360 3,800 <360SS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,300 <1,800 <380 <380 3,400 <380SS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,700 <1,900 <390 <390 3,900 <390SS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,000 <1,800 <370 <370 3,200 <370SS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 1,800 <1,900 <390 <390 2,800 <390SS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,700 <1,900 <390 <390 4,200 <390SS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,300 <1,900 <380 <380 3,700 <380SS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 1,900 <1,800 <370 <370 3,000 <370SS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 2,100 <1,800 <370 <370 3,300 <370SS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 ND <18,000 27,000 <3,700 ND 24,000SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 2,100 <1,900 <390 <390 3,400 <390SS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 2,700 <2,000 <420 <420 4,300 <420SS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 2,300 <1,800 <370 <370 3,600 <370SS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 ND <38,000 <7,800 <7,800 ND <7,800SS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 1,800 <1,900 <380 <380 2,800 <380
Appendixes 65

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Terphenyl-d14 surrogate (μg/kg) 9,10-Anthracenedione (μg/kg) Hexadecanoic acid (μg/kg) 1,4-Methanoazulene, decahydro (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 3,100 ND ND NDSS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 2,800 ND ND NDSS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 2,700 ND ND NDSS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 3,100 ND ND NDSS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 3,000 ND ND NDSS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 3,200 ND ND NDSS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,300 ND ND E1,000SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,300 ND ND NDSS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 2,500 ND ND NDSS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 3,100 ND ND NDSS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 2,700 ND ND NDSS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 3,700 ND ND NDSS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 3,000 ND ND NDSS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 3,000 ND ND NDSS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 2,800 ND ND NDSS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 2,900 ND ND NDSS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,600 ND ND NDSS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 3,200 ND E160 NDSS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,400 ND ND NDSS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,000 ND ND NDSS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,900 ND ND NDSS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 2,800 ND ND NDSS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 2,100 ND ND NDSS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 2,500 ND ND NDSS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 ND E4,400 ND NDSS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 2,200 ND ND NDSS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 2,900 ND ND NDSS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 2,500 ND ND NDSS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 ND ND ND NDSS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 2,000 ND ND ND
66 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamina- tion; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Unknown1

(μg/kg)

Unknown2

(μg/kg)

Unknown3

(μg/kg)

Unknown4

(μg/kg)

Unknown5

(μg/kg)

Unknown6

(μg/kg)

Unknown7

(μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 E430 E470 E260 E270 E11,000 ND NDSS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 E190 E8,700 ND ND ND ND NDSS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 E1,500 E240 E10,000 E170 ND ND NDSS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 E500 E200 E310 E2,600 E960 E330 E13,000SS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 E350 E980 E1,900 E3,700 E260 E11,000 E180SS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 E970 E240 E10,000 ND ND ND NDSS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E730 E160 E1,100 E250 E2000 E550 E160SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E340 E150 E7,100 ND ND ND NDSS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E180 E2200 E210 E8,700 ND ND NDSS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E150 E280 E11,000 ND ND ND NDSS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 E180 E250 E2,700 E240 E210 E8,800 NDSS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 E310 E13,000 E280 ND ND ND NDSS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 E1,300 E220 E270 E10,000 ND ND NDSS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 E640 E180 E190 E8,000 ND ND NDSS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 E680 E490 E500 E1,700 E510 E200 E7,900SS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 E190 E220 E9,000 ND ND ND NDSS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E340 E1,500 E330 E170 E7,500 ND NDSS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E190 E310 E12,000 ND ND ND NDSS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E410 E10,000 ND ND ND ND NDSS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E8,400 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E1,400 E180 E14,000 ND ND ND NDSS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 E13,000 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 E4,400 E11,000 E260 ND ND ND NDSS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 E160 E13,000 ND ND ND ND NDSS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E6,800 E1,600 E6,800 E1,500 E2,300 E3,400 E1,600SS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E11,000 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E14,000 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 E12,000 E300 ND ND ND ND NDSS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 E12,000 E3,700 E5,100 E7,300 ND ND NDSS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 E8,900 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Appendixes 67

Appendix 2. Soil data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[B, soil horizon B; C, soil horizon C; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; %, percent; std units, standard units; μmhos/cm, micromhos per centimeter; J, method blank contamination; E, estimated value; <, less than; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; μg/kg, micrograms per kilogram; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Unknown8 (μg/kg) Unknown9 (μg/kg) Unknown10 (μg/kg) Unknown11 (μg/kg) Unknown12 (μg/kg) Unknown13 (μg/kg)

SS1-B 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS1-C 35.293 -96.943 10/18/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS2-B1 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS2-B2 35.293 -96.943 10/19/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS3-A 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 E410 E610 E200 ND ND NDSS3-B 35.292 -96.943 10/19/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS4-A 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 E270 E410 E870 E150 E7,300 E170SS4-B 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS5-B1 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS5-B2 35.292 -96.944 10/20/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS6-A 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS6-C 35.291 -96.944 10/21/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS7-B 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS7-C 35.292 -96.944 10/21/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS8-B 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS8-C 35.292 -96.943 10/24/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS9-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS9-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS10-B 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS10-C 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS11-B1 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS11-B2 35.291 -96.943 10/25/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS12-B1 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS12-B2 35.291 -96.945 10/26/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS13-A 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS13-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS14-B 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS14-C 35.291 -96.943 10/26/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS15-A 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 ND ND ND ND ND NDSS15-B 35.292 -96.943 10/27/2005 ND ND ND ND ND ND
68 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006. [dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Time collected Field properties Specific conductance

(μS/cm)

pH

(std units)

Temperature

(oC)

Dissolved 

oxygen

(mg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 3,360 7.3 16.9 4.2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 2,260 7.5 14.9 1.1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 2,840 7.5 9.5 2.4Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 3,200 7.4 16.6 2.3Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 1,490 7.4 16.0 7.3Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 3,790 7.0 19.6 NDWell 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 3,470 6.6 16.9 2.0Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 3,060 7.3 18.5 7.8Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 1,640 7.0 16.6 5.4

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Aluminum

(μg/L)

Antimony

(μg/L)

Arsenic

(μg/L)

Barium

(μg/L)

Beryllium

(μg/L)

Cadmium

(μg/L)

Chromium

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <3 <0.40 0.13 132 <0.12 <0.08 E.02Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 4 <0.20 0.28 274 E0.04 <0.04 E.03SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 64 <0.40 3.1 972 E0.07 <0.08 0.18Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <3 <0.40 0.26 120 E0.06 <0.08 0.47Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 25 <0.20 0.34 271 <0.06 0.07 0.06Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <3 <0.40 <0.24 103 <0.12 <0.08 E.06Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <3 <0.40 0.30 524 <0.12 0.08 <0.08Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <3 <0.40 0.36 118 <0.12 <0.08 0.72Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 23 <0.20 0.29 314 <0.06 <0.04 0.05
Appendixes 69

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Cobalt

(μg/L)

Copper

(μg/L)

Lead

(μg/L)

Manganese

(μg/L)

Molybdenum

(μg/L)

Nickel

(μg/L)

Selenium

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 0.230 1.0 <0.16 212 E0.7 2.37 E0.07Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 0.974 0.8 <0.08 246 0.9 5.56 E0.05SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 6.99 1.1 0.31 4,420 1.3 5.34 0.16Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 0.290 1.2 <0.16 29.9 E0.5 4.23 .56Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 0.848 0.8 <0.08 155 1.2 6.16 E0.04Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 0.460 1.8 0.16 215 E0.6 7.56 <0.16Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 1.42 0.8 <0.16 303 E0.6 8.87 E0.08Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 0.360 0.9 0.17 11.8 <0.8 5.85 .72Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 0.685 0.5 E0.06 127 0.7 5.72 E0.04

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Silver

(μg/L)

Zinc

(μg/L)

Uranium (natural)

(μg/L)

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 E0.3 26.0 2.94 <2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <0.2 0.9 4.33 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <0.4 2.0 4.47 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 E0.3 <1.2 6.72 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <0.2 0.7 6.45 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.4 21.8 4.84 <0.30Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.4 1.3 5.35 <0.30Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.4 E1.0 7.26 <0.30Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.2 0.6 8.23 <0.30
70 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Time collected 2,4,6-Tribromophenol surrogate (% recovery) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

(μg/L)

2,4-Dichlorophenol

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 136 <1 <2

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 104 <1 <2

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 87.0 <1 <2

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 77.1 <1 <2

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 85.4 <1 <2

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 76.6 <0.31 <0.39

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 19.3 <0.31 <0.39

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 76.7 <0.31 <0.39

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 69.9 <0.31 <0.39

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

2,4-Dimethylphenol

(μg/L)

2,4-Dinitrophenol

(μg/L)

2,4-Dinitrotoluene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2.0 <3 <1Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2.0 <3 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2.0 <3 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2.0 <3 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2.0 <3 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.4 <0.80 <0.43Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.4 <0.80 <0.43Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.4 <0.80 <0.43Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.4 <0.80 <0.43
Appendixes 71

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

2,6-Dinitrotoluene

(μg/L)

2-Chloronaphthalene

(μg/L)

2-Chlorophenol

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 <1 <1Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <1 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <1 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <1 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <1 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.43 <0.38 <0.42Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.43 <0.38 <0.42Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.43 <0.38 <0.42Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.43 <0.38 <0.42

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol

(μg/L)

2-Nitrophenol

(μg/L)

3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 <1 <0.9Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <1 <0.9SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <1 <0.9Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <1 <0.9Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <1 <0.9Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.77 <0.30 <0.65Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.77 <0.30 <0.65Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.77 <0.30 <0.65Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.77 <0.30 <0.65
72 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micro- grams per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Time collected 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether

(μg/L)

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 <2

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.36 <0.55Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.36 <0.55Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.36 <0.55Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.36 <0.55

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether

(μg/L)

4-Nitrophenol

(μg/L)

9H-Fluorene

(μg/L)

Acenaphthene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <2

M

M

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <2 <1 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 <2 <1 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <2 <1 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <2 <1 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.34 <0.51 <0.33 <0.28Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.34 <0.51 <0.33 <0.28Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.34 <0.51 <0.33 <0.28Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.34 <0.51 <0.33 <0.28
Appendixes 73

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Acenaphthylene

(μg/L)

Anthracene

(μg/L)

Benzidine

(μg/L)

Benzo[a]anthracene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 <2 <1,000 <2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <2 <1,000 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <2 <1,000 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <2 <1,000 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <2 <1,000 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.30 <0.39 ND <0.26Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.30 <0.39 ND <0.26Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.30 M ND <0.26Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.30 <0.39 ND <0.26

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Benzo[a]pyrene

(μg/L)

Benzo[b]fluoranthene

(μg/L)

Benzo[ghi]perylene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <2 <2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <2 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 <2 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <2 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <2 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.33 <0.40 <0.64Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.33 <0.40 <0.64Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.33 <0.40 <0.64Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.33 <0.40 <0.64
74 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, esti- mated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Time collected Benzo[k]fluoranthene

(μg/L)

Benzyl n-butyl phthalate

(μg/L)

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <2 <1Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <2 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 <2 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <2 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <2 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.45 <1 <0.35Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.45 <1 <0.35Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.45 <1 <0.35Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.45 <1 <0.35

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether

(μg/L)

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <1Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.30 <0.38Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.30 <0.38Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.30 <0.38Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.30 <0.38
Appendixes 75

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

(μg/L)

Chrysene

(μg/L)

Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 <1 <2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 E10 <1 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <1 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <1 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <1 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <1 <0.33 <0.70Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <1 <0.33 <0.70Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <1 <0.33 <0.70Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <1 <0.33 <0.70

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Diethyl phthalate

(μg/L)

Dimethyl phthalate

(μg/L)

Di-n-butyl phthalate

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 M <2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 M M <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <1 <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 M M <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 M M <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.61 <0.59 <0.87Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.61 <0.59 <0.87Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.61 <0.59 <0.87Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.61 <0.59 <0.87
76 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Time collected Di-n-octyl phthalate

(μg/L)

Fluoranthene

(μg/L)

Hexachlorobenzene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <2 <1 <1

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <1 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <1 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <1 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <1 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <2 <0.30 <0.30Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <2 <0.30 <0.30Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <2 <0.30 <0.30Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <2 <0.30 <0.30

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene

(μg/L)

Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene

(μg/L)

Isophorone

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <2

M

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <2

M

SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 <2

M

Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <2

M

Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <2

M

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.52 <0.56 <0.60Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.52 <0.56 <0.60Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.52 <0.56 <0.60Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.52 <0.56 <0.60
Appendixes 77

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Nitrobenzene

(μg/L)

N-Nitrosodimethylamine

(μg/L)

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <2 <2Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <2 <2SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 ND <2Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <2 <2Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <2 <2Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.21 <0.33 <0.82Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.21 <0.33 <0.82Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.21 <0.33 <0.82Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.21 <0.33 <0.82

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine

(μg/L)

Pentachlorophenol

(μg/L)

Phenanthrene

(μg/L)

Phenol

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 M <2 <1 <1.6Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <2 <1 <3.5SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <2 <1 E37.8Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <2 <1 <3.5Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <2 <1 <3.5Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.81 <0.87 <0.32 <0.4Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.81 <0.87 <0.32 <0.4Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.81 <0.87 <0.32 <0.4Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.81 <0.87 <0.32 <0.4
78 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micro- grams per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Time collected Phenol-d5 surrogate (% recovery) Pyrene

(μg/L)

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 74.0 <2 <1Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 67.7 <2 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 64.4 <2 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 48.2 <2 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 48.2 <2 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 12.5 <0.35 <0.41Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 49.5 <0.35 <0.41Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 47.5 <0.35 <0.41Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 47.5 <0.35 <0.41

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

(μg/L)

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

(μg/L)

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

(μg/L)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500

M <1 <1

Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <2 <1 <1SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <2 <1 <1Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <2 <1 <1Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <2 <1 <1Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.49 <0.57 <0.53Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.49 <0.57 <0.53Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.49 <0.57 <0.53Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.49 <0.57 <0.53
Appendixes 79

Appendix 3. Ground-water data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; mg/L, milligrams per liter; std units, standard units; μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter; oC, degrees Celsius; μg/L, micrograms per liter; <, less than; E, estimated value; M, presence verified but not quantified; %, percent; ND, not determined]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Hexachlorobutadiene

(μg/L)

Hexachloroethane

(μg/L)

Naphthalene

(μg/L)

2-Fluorobiphenyl

surrogate (% recovery)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 <1 <2 M 110Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 <1 <2 <2 85SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 <1 <2 <2 54Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 <1 <2 <2 76Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 <1 <2 <2 76Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 <0.46 <0.66 <0.32 38Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 <0.46 <0.66 <0.32 73Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 <0.46 <0.66 <0.32 64Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 <0.46 <0.66 <0.32 64

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd)

Date 

collected

Time

 collected

Nitrobenzene-d5

surrogate (% recovery)

Terphenyl-d14

surrogate (% recovery)

Old Well 35.291 -96.943 12/05/2005 1500 120 100Well 2 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1130 94 78SW 3 35.292 -96.944 12/28/2005 1200 89 35Well 4 35.291 -96.944 12/28/2005 1100 89 72Well 5 35.293 -96.943 12/21/2005 1600 89 72Old Well 35.291 -96.943 05/01/2006 1600 40 29Well 2 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1000 74 63Well 4 35.291 -96.944 05/01/2006 1330 66 47Well 5 35.293 -96.943 05/01/2006 1200 66 47
80 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006. [all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Aluminum (%) Antimony (ppm) Arsenic (ppm) Barium (ppm) Beryllium (ppm) Bismuth (ppm) Boron (ppm) Cadmium (ppm) Calcium (%) Cerium (ppm) 1 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.15 0.4 37.6 <0.1 <0.02 5 0.04 0.44 0.01 2 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.5 0.2 45.9 <0.1 <0.02 5 0.11 0.54 0.02 3 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.08 0.2 25.5 <0.1 <0.02 11 0.33 0.33 0.03 4 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 <0.02 0.2 32.4 <0.1 <0.02 3 0.15 0.24 0.06 5 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.54 <0.1 30.1 <0.1 <0.02 1 0.06 0.21 0.01 6 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.3 100 <0.1 <0.02 3 0.16 0.5 0.03 7 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.09 0.2 63.9 <0.1 <0.02 7 0.46 0.84 0.02 8 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.56 0.1 20.8 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.1 0.25 0.02 9 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.2 26.4 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.06 0.23 0.02 10 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.2 0.1 30.7 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.29 0.32 0.01 11 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.18 <0.1 18.7 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.01 0.27 0.01 12 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.19 <0.1 75.3 <0.1 <0.02 4 0.37 0.53 0.14 13 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.2 0.1 26.8 <0.1 <0.02 8 0.5 0.68 0.09 14 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.1 0.3 81.5 <0.1 <0.02 4 0.07 0.98 0.03 15 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.06 0.2 53.2 <0.1 <0.02 6 0.08 0.66 0.02 16 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.05 0.2 53.7 <0.1 <0.02 5 0.3 0.72 0.04 17 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.06 0.1 63.5 <0.1 <0.02 4 0.12 0.6 0.02 18 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.1 0.3 68.6 <0.1 <0.02 9 0.23 0.88 0.04 19 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.17 0.3 56.7 <0.1 <0.02 5 0.42 0.83 0.03 20 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.07 0.1 88.2 <0.1 <0.02 4 0.02 0.59 0.04 21 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.07 0.1 63.3 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.06 0.54 0.08 22 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.07 0.2 21.1 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.01 0.24 0.01 23 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.1 38.5 <0.1 <0.02 10 0.06 0.63 0.06 24 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.08 0.3 30.6 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.11 0.4 0.02 25 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.15 <0.1 52.6 <0.1 <0.02 6 0.13 0.75 0.03

26 J 35.290 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.12 0.2 42.2 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.41 0.48 0.0127 J 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.07 0.2 20.7 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.02 0.18 0.0128 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.06 0.1 21.1 <0.1 <0.02 2 0.02 0.22 0.0129 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.12 0.2 29 <0.1 <0.02 1 0.02 0.29 0.0130 J 35.290 -96.946 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.12 <0.1 33.2 <0.1 <0.02 4 0.11 0.4 0.02
Appendixes 81

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Aluminum (%) Antimony (ppm) Arsenic (ppm) Barium (ppm) Beryllium (ppm) Bismuth (ppm) Boron (ppm) Cadmium (ppm) Calcium (%) Cerium (ppm)

31 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.3 105.4 <0.1 <0.02 57 0.08 1.3 0.0432 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.09 0.5 130.5 <0.1 <0.02 94 0.05 1.55 0.0833 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.09 0.5 79.3 <0.1 <0.02 65 0.06 1.32 0.0534 C 35.293 -96.943 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.09 0.2 148.7 <0.1 <0.02 100 0.41 1.71 0.0535 C 35.293 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.2 0.3 198.8 <0.1 <0.02 106 0.31 2.19 0.1136 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.13 0.4 118.8 <0.1 <0.02 100 0.14 1.89 0.0537 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.09 0.2 140.2 <0.1 <0.02 104 0.21 1.34 0.0738 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.3 191.9 <0.1 <0.02 88 0.37 1.56 0.1239 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.14 0.1 170.7 <0.1 <0.02 90 0.07 1.68 0.0940 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.12 0.3 125.6 <0.1 <0.02 102 0.2 2.02 0.1141 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.1 143.6 <0.1 <0.02 102 0.06 2 0.0842 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.2 123.2 <0.1 <0.02 86 0.12 1.32 0.0743 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.13 0.4 141.4 <0.1 <0.02 76 0.27 1.79 0.144 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.11 0.1 132.1 <0.1 <0.02 85 0.11 1.75 0.0845 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.1 0.3 170.4 <0.1 <0.02 121 0.04 1.78 0.0846 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.1 0.2 138 <0.1 <0.02 105 0.06 2.08 0.05
82 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Cesium (ppm) Chromium (ppm) Cobalt (ppm) Copper (ppm) Gallium (ppm) Germanium (ppm) Gold (ppb) Hafnium (ppm) Indium (ppm) Iron (%) 1 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.005 2.3 0.09 1.88 <0.1 0.06 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.005 2 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.005 2 0.04 2.72 <0.1 0.06 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.006 3 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.007 2.3 0.06 4.46 <0.1 0.11 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.009 4 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.006 2.2 0.03 2.97 <0.1 0.05 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.009 5 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.005 2.1 0.03 2.94 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.003 6 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.005 2.1 0.03 1.55 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.005 7 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.005 2.2 0.11 3.09 <0.1 0.18 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.006 8 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.006 2.1 0.03 3.38 <0.1 0.05 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.005 9 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.005 1.9 0.02 2.84 <0.1 0.03 0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.002 10 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.007 2.1 0.02 3.07 <0.1 0.11 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.004 11 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.005 2 0.06 2.26 <0.1 0.03 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.003 12 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.005 2 0.14 3.06 <0.1 0.04 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.005 13 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.01 2.2 0.08 3.56 <0.1 0.14 0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.018 14 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.005 2.2 0.07 2.51 <0.1 0.09 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.006 15 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.006 2.2 0.04 2.82 <0.1 0.06 <0.2 0.003 <0.02 0.005 16 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.005 2.2 0.06 3.01 <0.1 0.11 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.008 17 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.005 2.3 0.04 2.99 <0.1 0.07 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.006 18 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.007 2.3 0.11 4.23 <0.1 0.08 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.01 19 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.005 2.1 0.05 3 <0.1 0.08 0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.006 20 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.005 2.2 0.03 3.48 <0.1 0.07 0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.006 21 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.007 1.9 0.03 2.42 <0.1 0.06 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.005 22 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.005 2.2 0.01 2.4 <0.1 0.03 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.004 23 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.008 2.4 0.34 3.1 <0.1 0.07 0.3 0.001 <0.02 0.027 24 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.005 2.1 0.03 3.01 <0.1 0.07 0.8 0.001 <0.02 0.005 25 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.006 2.3 0.04 4.63 <0.1 0.1 0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.013

26 J 35.290 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.005 2.1 0.05 4 <0.1 0.05 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.00527 J 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.005 2 0.05 2.75 <0.1 0.02 0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.00328 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.005 2.2 0.04 3.6 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.00429 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.005 2.2 0.03 3.16 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.00330 J 35.290 -96.946 09/22/2005 <0.005 2.1 0.04 3.06 <0.1 0.05 0.3 0.001 <0.02 0.006
Appendixes 83

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Cesium (ppm) Chromium (ppm) Cobalt (ppm) Copper (ppm) Gallium (ppm) Germanium (ppm) Gold (ppb) Hafnium (ppm) Indium (ppm) Iron (%)

31 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.012 2.3 0.02 7.32 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.00832 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.009 2.6 0.04 7.34 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.00833 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.01 2.4 0.03 6.63 <0.1 0.02 1.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.00634 C 35.293 -96.943 09/22/2005 0.007 2.5 0.03 5.96 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.003 <0.02 0.00635 C 35.293 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.01 2.3 0.03 7.35 <0.1 0.03 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.00936 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.012 2.3 0.03 5.68 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.00837 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.007 2.2 0.02 6.67 <0.1 0.04 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.00638 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.009 2.2 0.02 4.31 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.00739 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.017 2.2 0.03 4.44 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 0.002 <0.02 0.00740 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.015 2.5 0.05 5.06 <0.1 0.04 0.4 0.004 <0.02 0.04741 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.01 2.2 0.05 5.78 <0.1 0.01 0.4 0.001 <0.02 0.01042 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.009 2.6 0.03 7.85 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.00943 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.008 2.3 0.05 6.59 <0.1 0.01 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.00644 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.01 2.2 0.03 7.82 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.001 <0.02 0.00945 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.009 2.3 0.03 6.16 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 0.003 <0.02 0.00946 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.008 2.4 0.03 6.72 <0.1 0.02 <0.2 <0.001 <0.02 0.010
84 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Lanthanum (ppm) Lead (ppm) Lithium (ppm) Magnesium (%) Manganese (ppm) Mercury (ppb) Molybdenum (ppm) Nickel (ppm) Niobium (ppm) 1 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.06 0.06 0.255 41 3 0.34 0.2 <0.01 2 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.13 0.06 0.213 59 3 0.57 0.3 <0.01 3 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.276 53 4 0.6 0.2 <0.01 4 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.196 18 7 0.26 0.1 0.01 5 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.106 30 6 0.45 0.4 <0.01 6 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.12 0.17 0.02 0.215 24 2 0.39 0.2 <0.01 7 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.01 0.52 0.11 0.193 56 7 0.67 0.2 <0.01 8 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.01 0.73 0.1 0.082 64 84 1.48 0.6 <0.01 9 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.01 0.09 0.03 0.076 22 149 1.18 0.3 <0.01 10 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.01 0.19 0.12 0.075 26 4 1.01 0.4 <0.01 11 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.07 0.03 0.071 38 1 1.09 0.3 0.01 12 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.15 1.36 0.1 0.245 52 3 0.89 0.2 0.01 13 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.09 1.79 0.07 0.226 44 9 0.68 0.3 <0.01 14 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.01 0.17 0.04 0.216 33 3 0.92 0.1 <0.01 15 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.01 0.37 0.07 0.257 32 4 0.89 0.3 0.01 16 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.01 0.3 0.06 0.218 48 6 0.82 0.3 0.01 17 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.01 0.13 0.06 0.187 22 6 1.2 0.2 0.01 18 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.03 0.23 0.06 0.271 124 5 0.39 0.2 <0.01 19 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.01 0.13 0.05 0.263 62 4 0.47 0.2 <0.01 20 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.03 0.25 0.03 0.251 50 5 0.35 0.2 0.01 21 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.08 0.16 0.03 0.261 120 2 0.19 0.2 0.01 22 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.01 0.08 0.09 0.063 18 3 1.19 0.2 <0.01 23 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.06 1.06 0.07 0.201 87 3 0.52 0.5 0.01 24 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.01 0.29 0.03 0.138 21 3 0.97 0.2 <0.01 25 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.01 1.34 0.07 0.255 25 10 0.85 0.3 0.01

26 J 35.290 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.225 33 4 0.74 0.2 <0.0127 J 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.01 0.07 0.05 0.101 98 3 0.33 0.2 0.0128 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.01 0.05 0.07 0.078 30 3 0.51 0.2 <0.0129 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.01 0.1 0.07 0.106 36 5 1.41 0.3 0.0130 J 35.290 -96.946 09/22/2005 0.01 0.07 0.08 0.306 25 3 0.73 0.2 <0.01
Appendixes 85

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Lanthanum (ppm) Lead (ppm) Lithium (ppm) Magnesium (%) Manganese (ppm) Mercury (ppb) Molybdenum (ppm) Nickel (ppm) Niobium (ppm)

31 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.02 0.11 0.09 0.284 82 20 0.47 0.8 0.0132 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.07 0.11 0.12 0.308 107 31 0.31 0.7 0.0133 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.03 0.13 0.09 0.241 80 27 0.86 0.3 0.0134 C 35.293 -96.943 09/22/2005 0.05 0.26 0.15 0.3 108 24 0.89 0.8 0.0135 C 35.293 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.09 0.28 0.1 0.349 71 36 0.32 0.8 0.0236 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.04 0.3 0.1 0.315 64 26 0.95 0.4 0.0137 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.08 0.14 0.09 0.365 287 24 0.38 2.1 <0.0138 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.19 0.24 0.09 0.426 318 24 0.37 2.3 <0.0139 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.23 0.29 0.09 0.377 191 25 1.1 1.1 0.0140 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.09 0.66 0.17 0.337 114 28 1.07 0.8 0.0341 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.08 0.26 0.1 0.317 84 28 0.51 0.9 0.0142 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.05 0.18 0.08 0.287 88 21 0.86 0.7 <0.0143 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.1 0.14 0.07 0.279 507 20 0.3 1.4 0.0144 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.08 0.14 0.15 0.469 266 44 0.31 1.7 0.0145 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.07 0.18 0.1 0.314 91 32 0.71 1 0.0146 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.04 0.15 0.12 0.269 73 40 0.58 0.6 0.01
86 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Palladium (ppb) Phosphorus (%) Platinum (ppb) Potassium (%) Rhenium (ppb) Rubidium (ppm) Scandium (ppm) Selenium (ppm) Silver (ppb) 1 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.117 <1 0.49 <1 2.4 0.3 0.4 <2 2 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.136 1 0.27 <1 1.2 0.2 0.4 2 3 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.106 1 1.28 1 5.2 0.2 0.3 3 4 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.103 1 0.85 <1 2.7 0.2 0.2 <2 5 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.034 1 0.75 <1 4 0.2 <0.1 2 6 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.03 <1 0.2 <1 0.9 0.2 0.1 5 7 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.076 <1 0.44 <1 1.3 0.3 0.4 2 8 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.083 1 0.86 <1 2.4 0.3 0.2 <2 9 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.074 1 0.68 <1 3 0.3 0.2 <2 10 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <2 0.144 <1 0.9 <1 5.7 0.3 0.1 2 11 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.108 <1 1.01 <1 2.4 0.2 0.2 <2 12 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.076 1 0.68 <1 1.3 0.3 0.3 8 13 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.068 <1 0.3 1 1.5 0.1 0.5 19 14 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.086 <1 0.49 <1 2.2 0.2 0.2 4 15 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.199 1 0.26 <1 0.8 0.2 0.4 4 16 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.098 1 0.39 1 1.3 0.2 0.3 4 17 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.169 <1 0.6 <1 2.1 0.1 0.3 <2 18 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <2 0.187 1 0.32 <1 1.4 0.2 0.8 4 19 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.201 <1 0.29 <1 1.1 0.2 0.2 4 20 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.163 1 0.36 <1 2.1 0.2 0.1 3 21 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.048 1 0.27 <1 3.2 0.3 0.2 2 22 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.094 <1 1.05 <1 1.4 0.2 0.2 2 23 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.059 <1 0.37 <1 0.4 0.1 0.7 4 24 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.108 <1 1.03 <1 5.4 0.2 0.1 3 25 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.176 1 0.38 1 1.6 0.1 <0.1 5

26 J 35.290 -96.944 09/21/2005 <2 0.14 1 0.45 <1 2.3 0.2 0.3 <227 J 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.069 1 1.36 <1 1.4 0.2 0.1 228 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <2 0.158 1 1.31 <1 1.1 0.1 0.3 <229 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <2 0.042 <1 0.82 <1 3.9 0.2 0.2 <230 J 35.290 -96.946 09/22/2005 <2 0.279 <1 0.46 1 0.7 0.2 0.4 2
Appendixes 87

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Palladium (ppb) Phosphorus (%) Platinum (ppb) Potassium (%) Rhenium (ppb) Rubidium (ppm) Scandium (ppm) Selenium (ppm) Silver (ppb)

31 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <2 0.139 1 0.86 <1 3.4 0.2 0.3 232 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <2 0.113 <1 0.36 <1 0.5 0.2 0.1 233 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <2 0.11 <1 0.52 <1 2.4 0.2 0.2 334 C 35.293 -96.943 09/22/2005 <2 0.13 <1 0.39 <1 1.4 0.2 0.2 235 C 35.293 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.13 <1 0.23 <1 0.3 0.2 0.2 536 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.116 <1 0.52 1 3 0.2 0.1 537 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.087 <1 0.51 <1 1.6 0.1 0.1 638 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.086 1 0.42 <1 2.3 0.2 0.1 839 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.078 1 0.3 <1 1.4 0.1 0.1 440 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.101 <1 0.41 1 3.4 0.1 0.2 441 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.098 <1 0.41 1 2 0.2 0.2 642 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.096 <1 0.99 <1 1.1 0.2 0.1 443 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.109 <1 0.93 <1 1.9 0.2 0.1 1044 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.11 <1 0.41 <1 1.4 0.2 0.2 1745 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.109 <1 0.56 1 3.2 0.3 0.1 846 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <2 0.13 <1 0.51 <1 1 0.2 0.2 6
88 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Sodium (%) Strontium (ppm) Sulfur (%) Tantalum (ppm) Tellurium (ppm) Thallium (ppm) Thorium (ppm) Tin (ppm) Titanium (ppm) 1 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.033 33.9 0.12 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 3 2 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.02 50.5 0.11 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 4 3 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.105 38.5 0.11 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 3 4 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.023 21.6 0.08 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.02 3 5 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.032 15.2 0.08 0.009 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.17 1 6 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.018 38.1 0.15 0.006 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 1 7 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.043 99.6 0.14 0.004 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.09 2 8 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.036 26.5 0.09 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 2 9 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.03 21.7 0.07 0.001 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 2 10 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.034 20.5 0.08 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.02 4 11 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.029 35.2 0.08 0.004 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 3 12 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.024 61.7 0.1 0.001 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.02 2 13 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.027 64.9 0.13 0.011 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.14 2 14 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.022 121 0.14 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 2 15 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.017 119.1 0.09 0.005 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 6 16 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.027 98.1 0.13 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.08 3 17 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.02 66.2 0.11 0.003 <0.02 0.06 <0.01 0.04 5 18 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.03 102.1 0.13 0.019 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.09 5 19 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.024 91.1 0.16 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.02 5 20 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.018 69.3 0.16 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 5 21 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.013 77.4 0.18 0.013 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.19 1 22 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.028 32 0.09 0.001 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 3 23 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.067 154.5 0.12 0.003 <0.02 0.03 <0.01 0.1 2 24 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.02 34.9 0.13 0.008 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.1 3 25 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.026 116.8 0.12 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 5

26 J 35.290 -96.944 09/21/2005 0.019 40 0.13 0.007 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 4

27 J 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.022 31.1 0.1 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 2

28 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.023 23 0.1 0.007 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 4

29 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.027 15.1 0.08 0.012 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.1 1

30 J 35.290 -96.946 09/22/2005 0.021 35.5 0.13 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 7
Appendixes 89

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Sodium (%) Strontium (ppm) Sulfur (%) Tantalum (ppm) Tellurium (ppm) Thallium (ppm) Thorium (ppm) Tin (ppm) Titanium (ppm)

31 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.037 155.3 0.12 0.006 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 432 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.052 243 0.18 0.005 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 333 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.049 130.7 0.18 0.004 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.08 334 C 35.293 -96.943 09/22/2005 0.043 182.5 0.15 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 435 C 35.293 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.06 269.5 0.2 0.005 0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.08 436 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.048 152.3 0.16 0.011 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.08 437 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.049 138.7 0.14 0.001 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.02 238 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.047 145.5 0.17 0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.09 239 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.044 167.4 0.09 0.007 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.09 340 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.047 226.6 0.14 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 341 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.042 250.1 0.13 0.012 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.31 342 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.061 265.5 0.16 0.002 0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 343 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.051 273 0.18 0.013 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.05 344 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.052 175.9 0.16 0.003 0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.07 345 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.045 185.4 0.16 0.003 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.03 346 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.049 294 0.13 0.002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 0.04 4
90 Reconnaissance of Soil, Ground Water, and Plant Contamination near Shawnee, Oklahoma, 2005–2006 Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued [all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than] Local identifier Latitude (dd.dddddd) Longitude (-dd.dddddd) Date collected Tungsten (ppm) Uranium (ppm) Vanadium (ppm) Yttrium (ppm) Zinc (ppm) Zirconium (ppm) 1 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.1 <0.01 <2 0.005 35.5 0.01 2 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.3 <0.01 <2 0.007 61.5 <0.01 3 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 0.1 <0.01 <2 0.01 72.1 0.01 4 J 35.290 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.015 61.5 0.02 5 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.005 119.7 0.01 6 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.049 64.2 0.02 7 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.004 184.5 0.01 8 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.005 73.8 0.01 9 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.006 32.5 <0.01 10 J 35.291 -96.943 09/20/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.003 126 0.01 11 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.002 33.7 0.01 12 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.052 137.5 0.01 13 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 0.1 <0.01 <2 0.026 139.8 0.03 14 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.009 68.8 0.01 15 J 35.292 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.009 93.9 0.02 16 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.01 98.7 0.01 17 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.008 111.5 0.01 18 J 35.293 -96.943 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.009 88 0.01 19 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.008 86.5 0.01 20 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.014 87.8 0.01 21 J 35.292 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.024 57.4 0.01 22 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.005 28.2 0.01 23 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.013 77.6 0.02 24 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.005 87.9 0.01 25 J 35.291 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.008 173.2 0.01

26 J 35.290 -96.944 09/21/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.004 97 <0.0127 J 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.004 41.8 0.0128 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.003 43.9 <0.0129 J 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 <0.1 <0.01 <2 0.005 57.1 <0.0130 J 35.290 -96.946 09/22/2005 0.1 <0.01 <2 0.007 51.5 0.01
Appendixes 91

Appendix 4. Plant data for the oilfield-service site near Shawnee, Oklahoma 2005-2006.—Continued[all values reported as dry weight, J, Johnson grass; C, Coralberry; dd.dddddd, decimal degrees; ppm, parts per million; ppb, parts per billion; %, percent; <, less than]

Local

identifier

Latitude

(dd.dddddd)

Longitude

(-dd.dddddd) Date collected Tungsten (ppm) Uranium (ppm) Vanadium (ppm) Yttrium (ppm) Zinc (ppm) Zirconium (ppm)

31 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.4 0.03 <2 0.016 35.4 0.0232 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.6 0.06 <2 0.023 39.3 0.0233 C 35.291 -96.945 09/22/2005 0.6 0.05 <2 0.017 36.6 0.0234 C 35.293 -96.943 09/22/2005 0.6 0.05 <2 0.016 46.1 0.0235 C 35.293 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.8 0.07 <2 0.032 80.6 0.0336 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.5 0.04 <2 0.015 58.6 0.0237 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.8 0.05 <2 0.026 51.9 0.0238 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.5 0.04 <2 0.045 62 0.0239 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.8 0.06 <2 0.07 43.5 0.0340 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.8 0.05 <2 0.037 49.5 0.0441 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.7 0.05 <2 0.024 62.2 0.0342 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.5 0.03 <2 0.017 92.9 0.0143 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.5 0.04 <2 0.033 34.9 0.0144 C 35.292 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.6 0.05 <2 0.031 33.7 0.0245 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.6 0.05 <2 0.02 44.2 0.0246 C 35.291 -96.944 09/22/2005 0.8 0.07 <2 0.017 52.8 0.01