alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1631

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude from creditable 

wages and self-employment income wages earned for services by aliens 

illegally performed in the United States and self-employment income 

derived from a trade or business illegally conducted in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Ms. GINNY

BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. GOODE, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. 

NORWOOD, and Mr. TANCREDO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to exclude 

from creditable wages and self-employment income wages 

earned for services by aliens illegally performed in the 

United States and self-employment income derived from 

a trade or business illegally conducted in the United 

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Social Security for 

5 Illegal Immigrants Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 1631 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF UNAUTHORIZED EMPLOYMENT 

2 FROM EMPLOYMENT UPON WHICH CRED3 ITABLE WAGES MAY BE BASED. 

4 Section 210(a)(19) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 410(a)(19)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(19) Service’’ and inserting the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(19)(A) Service performed by an alien while 

9 employed in the United States for any period during 

10 which the alien is not authorized to be so employed. 

11 ‘‘(B) Service’’. 

12 SEC. 3. EXCLUSION OF UNAUTHORIZED FUNCTIONS AND 

13 SERVICES FROM TRADE OR BUSINESS FROM 

14 WHICH CREDITABLE SELF-EMPLOYMENT IN15 COME MAY BE DERIVED. 

16 Section 211(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 411(c)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (6) the 

18 following new paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(7) The performance of a function or service 

20 in the United States by an alien during any period 

21 for which the alien is not authorized to perform such 

22 function or service in the United States.’’. 

23 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

24 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

25 respect to wages earned, and self-employment income de26 rived, before, on, or after the date of the enactment of 
3

•HR 1631 IH 

1 this Act. Notwithstanding section 215(f)(1) of the Social 

2 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(f)(1)), as soon as practicable 

3 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Commis4 sioner of Social Security shall recompute all primary in5 surance amounts to the extent necessary to carry out such 

6 amendments. Such amendments shall affect benefits only 

7 for months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
exv10w61



 








RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003



Exhibit 10.61




Kevin M. Webb

8901 Iron Gate Court

Potomac, MD 20854 USA


Dear Kevin:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Kevin M. Webb
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: June 12, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 35,000

Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting



11,666 on 06/12/2004

11,667 on 06/12/2005

11,667 on 06/12/2006


By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Kevin M. Webb

	 	Date: ________________
	                     Kevin M. Webb
	 	 






Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
#### § 330.102 Methods of filling vacancies.

An agency may fill a vacancy in the competitive service by any method authorized in this chapter, including competitive appointment from a list of eligibles, noncompetitive appointment under special authority, reinstatement, transfer, reassignment, change to lower grade, or promotion. The agency must exercise its discretion in each personnel action solely on the basis of merit and fitness, without regard to political or religious affiliation, marital status, or race, and veterans' preference entitlements.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Richard P. Crystal, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New York & Company, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: December 8, 2009

/s/ RICHARD P. CRYSTAL Richard P. Crystal Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior United States District Judge **

for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation. 

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FERNANDO ALVAREZ-APODACA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10103

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00715-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Gordon J. Quist, District Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted September 10, 2012*** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Fernando Alvarez-Apodaca appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 

63-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

FILED

SEP 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-10103

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarez-Apodaca’s counsel

has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarez-Apodaca the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/  Neal Ludeke
------------------------------
by: Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
American Credit Corp., Manager
of the Company
February 13, 2003
#### In the Matter of Bard & Margolies, Inc., Appellant, against Fred Leinweber, Respondent, and Charles Edwards, Judgment Debtor.

Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 317.502 Qualifications Review Board certification. ( a ) A Qualification Review Board (QRB) convened by OPM must certify the executive/managerial qualifications of a candidate before initial career appointment may be made to an SES position. More than one-half of the members of a QRB must be SES career appointees.
( b ) Agency requests for certification of a candidate by a QRB must contain such information as prescribed by OPM, including evidence that merit staffing procedures were followed and that the appointing authority has certified the candidate's qualifications for the position.
( c ) Qualifications Review Board certification of executive qualifications must be based on demonstrated executive experience; successful completion of an OPM-approved candidate development program; or possession of special or unique qualities that indicate a likelihood of executive success. Any existing time limit on a previously approved certification is removed.
( d ) OPM may determine the disposition of agency QRB requests where the QRB has not yet acted if the agency head leaves office or announces an intention to leave office, if the President has nominated a new agency head, or if there is a Presidential transition.
( e ) An action to convert a “noncareer-type” employee to a career SES appointment in the employee's current position or a successor to that position will not be forwarded to a QRB. A “noncareer-type” employee includes a noncareer SES appointee, a Schedule C appointee, or equivalent.
( f ) A new QRB certification is required for an individual to be reappointed as an SES career appointee following separation of the individual from an SES career appointment if: ( 1 ) The individual was removed during the SES probationary period for performance or disciplinary reasons; or
( 2 ) The individual completed an SES probationary period, or did not have to serve one, and was removed for a reason that made the individual ineligible for reinstatement to the SES under subpart G of this part.
[54 FR 9758, Mar. 8, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 170, Jan. 3, 1991; 60 FR 6385, Feb. 2, 1995; 61 FR 46533, Sept. 4, 1996; 65 FR 33740, May 25, 2000]
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



|In connection
    with the Quarterly Report of Clixster Mobile Group Inc a Texas corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
    nine months period ending September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
    "Report"), Noor Azlan Khamis, I, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) | The Report
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
    Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed
    original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Clixster Mobile Group Inc, and will be retained
    by Clixster Mobile Group Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|/s/
    Noor Azlan Khamis 
|--------------------------
|--------------------------
|Noor Azlan Khamis         
|Chief Executive Officer   
|June 23, 2014
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY OF 2002

In connection with the interim quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d)
of the securities exchange act of 1934 of Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc. on
Form 10QSB dated for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Registration Statement fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) pr 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Registration Statement fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


February 21, 2006

By: /s/ Clive de Larrabeiti
    -----------------------
§ 177.106 Authority to adjust, determine, compromise, and settle. ( a ) The General Counsel of OPM, or his or her designee, is delegated authority to consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, compromise, and settle claims under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2672, and this part. The General Counsel, in his or her discretion, has the authority to further delegate the responsibility for adjudicating, considering, adjusting, compromising, and settling any claim submitted under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2672, and this part, that is based on the alleged negligence or wrongful act or omission of an OPM employee, with the exception of claims involving personal injury. All claims involving personal injury will be adjudicated, considered, adjusted, compromised and settled by the Office of the General Counsel.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB of the year ended December 31, 2005, we hereby
certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

    1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
        materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.


OnScreen Technologies, Inc.

By:   /s/                                         February 23, 2006
    -----------------------------------
      Charles R. Baker, President/CEO

By:   /s/                                         February 23, 2006
    -------------------------------------
      Mark R. Chandler, CFO



                                       47
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1711

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that functions relating 

to the air traffic control system are carried out directly by the United 

States Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. DEFAZIO, and Mr. QUINN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that functions relating to the air traffic control system are carried 

out directly by the United States Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Traffic Control 

5 System Integrity Act of 2003’’.
2

•HR 1711 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON DELEGATION OF DUTIES AND POW2 ERS RELATED TO AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL 

3 SYSTEM. 

4 Section 44502(a)(3) of title 49, United States Code, 

5 is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(3) The Secretary’’ and insert7 ing the following: 

8 ‘‘(3) DELEGATION OF POWERS AND DUTIES.—

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) LIMITATIONS.—The Secretary shall 

12 not authorize the conversion of any of the fol13 lowing facilities or functions of the air traffic 

14 control system, as defined in section 40102, to 

15 a private entity or a public entity other than 

16 the United States Government: 

17 ‘‘(i) A facility controlled by the Fed18 eral Aviation Administration. 

19 ‘‘(ii) Operations performed, on the 

20 date of enactment of this subparagraph, by 

21 Federal employees at a facility controlled 

22 by the Federal Aviation Administration. 

23 ‘‘(iii) Maintenance, engineering, or 

24 oversight functions performed, on or after 

25 the date of enactment of this subpara-
3

•HR 1711 IH 

1 graph, at a facility controlled by the Fed2 eral Aviation Administration. 

3 ‘‘(C) APPLICABILITY OF LIMITATIONS.—

4 ‘‘(i) CONTRACT TOWER PROGRAM.—

5 Subparagraphs (B)(i) and (B)(ii) shall not 

6 apply to a Federal Aviation Administration 

7 airport traffic control tower operated under 

8 the contract tower program on the date of 

9 enactment of this subparagraph. 

10 ‘‘(ii) EXISTING MAINTENANCE AND

11 ENGINEERING AGREEMENTS.—Subpara12 graph (B)(iii) shall not apply to the re13 newal or replacement of a maintenance or 

14 engineering agreement in effect on the 

15 date of enactment of this subparagraph.’’.

Æ
### §10721. Establishment of grant program

#### (a) Authorization

The Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance is authorized to enter into a cooperative agreement with or make a grant to an eligible entity for the purpose of improving the identification, investigation, and prosecution of white collar crime (including each category of such crimes set forth in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (b)) by providing comprehensive, direct, and practical training and technical assistance to law enforcement officers, investigators, auditors and prosecutors in States and units of local government.

#### (b) White collar crime defined

For purposes of this subchapter, the term "white collar crime" includes—

(1) high-tech crime, including cyber and electronic crime and related threats;

(2) economic crime, including financial fraud and mortgage fraud; and

(3) Internet-based crime against children and child pornography.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3031, as added Pub. L. 115–76, §3(a), Nov. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 1247.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of part MM of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, which is classified to this subchapter, as the "National White Collar Crime Control Act of 2017", see section 3030 of Pub. L. 90–351, set out as a Short Title of 1968 Act note under section 10101 of this title.
§ 550.1616 Corrective actions. ( a ) Except at provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an error made in connection with the assignment of an agent's regular tour of duty (including any associated overtime supplement) must be corrected as soon as possible.
( b ) A retroactive correction of a tour assignment (*i.e.,* actual assigned work schedule as opposed to an error in the payroll system) may not be made in the following circumstances, unless CBP determines there exists, in connection with an agent's assigned tour, evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, fault, or lack of good faith on the part of the affected agent: ( 1 ) Correction of an error in applying the consistency requirement described in §§ 550.1611(f)(5) and 550.1615; and
( 2 ) Correction of an error that caused an employee to have a Level 1 regular tour of duty based solely on misapplication of the applicable percentage limitation described in §§ 550.1611(f)(4) and 550.1614.