alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §59x. Exemption from General Bridge Act of 1946

#### (a) Waters declared nonnavigable

The waters described in subsection (b) are declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States for purposes of the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.).

#### (b) Waters described

The waters referred to in subsection (a) are a drainage canal which—

(1) is an unnamed tributary of the creek known as Newton Creek, located at block 641 (formerly designated as block 860) in the city of Camden, New Jersey;

(2) originates at the north bank of Newton Creek approximately 1,200 feet east of the confluence of Newton Creek and the Delaware River; and

(3) terminates at drainage culverts on the west side of Interstate Highway 676.

(Pub. L. 100–448, §16, Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1845; Pub. L. 100–457, title III, §325, Sept. 30, 1988, 102 Stat. 2150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Bridge Act of 1946, referred to in subsec. (a), is title V of act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, 60 Stat. 847, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§525 et seq.) of chapter 11 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 525 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 100–448 and Pub. L. 100–457 enacted identical sections.
§ 2425.6 Grounds for review; potential dismissal or denial for failure to raise or support grounds. ( a ) The Authority will review an arbitrator's award to which an exception has been filed to determine whether the award is deficient— ( 1 ) Because it is contrary to any law, rule or regulation; or
( 2 ) On other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations.
( b ) If a party argues that an award is deficient on private-sector grounds under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, then the excepting party must explain how, under standards set forth in the decisional law of the Authority or Federal courts: ( 1 ) The arbitrator: ( i ) Exceeded his or her authority; or
( ii ) Was biased; or
( iii ) Denied the excepting party a fair hearing; or
( 2 ) The award: ( i ) Fails to draw its essence from the parties' collective bargaining agreement; or
( ii ) Is based on a nonfact; or
( iii ) Is incomplete, ambiguous, or contradictory as to make implementation of the award impossible; or
( iv ) Is contrary to public policy; or
( v ) Is deficient on the basis of a private-sector ground not listed in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (b)(2)(iv) of this section.
( c ) If a party argues that the award is deficient on a private-sector ground raised under paragraph (b)(2)(v) of this section, the party must provide sufficient citation to legal authority that establishes the grounds upon which the party filed its exceptions.
( d ) The Authority does not have jurisdiction over an award relating to: ( 1 ) An action based on unacceptable performance covered under 5 U.S.C. 4303;
( 2 ) A removal, suspension for more than fourteen (14) days, reduction in grade, reduction in pay, or furlough of thirty (30) days or less covered under 5 U.S.C. 7512; or
( 3 ) Matters similar to those covered under 5 U.S.C. 4303 and 5 U.S.C. 7512 which arise under other personnel systems.
( e ) An exception may be subject to dismissal or denial if: ( 1 ) The excepting party fails to raise and support a ground as required in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, or otherwise fails to demonstrate a legally recognized basis for setting aside the award; or
( 2 ) The exception concerns an award described in paragraph (d) of this section.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UNE 10, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 5 8 3 6 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 7

- 0 0 1 4 9

- C R

- C A P

- 3

- 1

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

E D W A R D L O P E Z ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f G e o r g i a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e C A R N E S , W I L S O N a n d K R A V I T C H , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

M a r y E r i c k s o n , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r E d w a r d L o p e z i n t h i s d i r e c t c r i m i n a l

a p p e a l , h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e a p p e l l a n t a n df

i l e d a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

.
1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e

r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s
G R A N T E D , a n d L o p e z ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
### §1418. Regulations

In carrying out the responsibilities and authority conferred by this subchapter, the Administrator, the Secretary, and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating are authorized to issue such regulations as they may deem appropriate.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title I, §108, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1059.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Oct. 23, 1972, see section 110(a) of Pub. L. 92–532, set out as a note under section 1411 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
### §544b. Employment of physicians to examine employees; fee or employment basis; validation of prior agreements

The Chief of Engineers may authorize the employment of physicians under agreement, to make such physical examinations of employees or prospective employees as he may consider essential, on a fee or regular employment basis, and all agreements entered into prior to March 2, 1945, for such purposes are validated, and the Comptroller General is authorized and directed to allow credit in the accounts of disbursing officers for reasonable payments made prior to March 2, 1945, for such services.

(Mar. 2, 1945, ch. 19, §5, 59 Stat. 24.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain functions insofar as they pertain to Air Force, and to extent that they were not previously transferred to Secretary of the Air Force and Department of the Air Force from Secretary of the Army and Department of the Army, see Secretary of Defense Transfer Order No. 40, July 22, 1949.
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-010 January 23, 2007

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC GRANTS ENTERGY’S REQUEST FOR EXTENDED DEADLINE 

FOR MEETING ORDER RELATED TO SIREN BACK-UP POWER

After careful review, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted Entergy's request

for an extension of the deadline for completing a project at the Indian Point Energy Center that was

required by NRC Order to meet specifications in the 2005 Energy Policy Act. Entergy now has until

April 15 to complete installation of back-up power for its alert and notification system, as originally

outlined in a January 2006 confirmatory Order. The original Order set a January 30, 2007, deadline for

compliance.

The NRC determined that Entergy provided good cause for the extension, including delays that

were unanticipated, and had made reasonable and appropriate attempts to resolve these issues within

the time initially provided in the Order. 

In its extension request, Entergy stated that “considerable progress” has been made toward

completing the work, but cited issues with a tower needed to support additional equipment, testing of

the system, training of emergency service workers and obtaining additional local permits for the new

siren locations as reasons for the extension request. Entergy had asked for an extension until April 15,

2007. Entergy noted in the extension request that they had discussed the request with surrounding

counties.

Indian Point’s existing alert and notification system is unaffected by the new system and

remains in place to notify the public, if necessary. 

"We carefully evaluated this request and believe that Entergy took reasonable steps to complete

installation of the system and has provided good cause for relaxation of the Order deadline," said Jim

Dyer, Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

The Energy Policy Act included a provision directing the NRC to require nuclear power plants

located within certain population densities to have back-up power for their emergency notification

systems, including sirens. Indian Point is the only nuclear plant that fell within the requirement. 
The Entergy extension request and the NRC approval letter are posted on this page: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/indian-point-issues.html . 

### 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
# L_2015230EN.01004301.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/43

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 236/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1460]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU of 11 March 2014 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network and alert thresholds for the second reference period 2015-19 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU of 11 March 2014 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network and alert thresholds for the second reference period 2015-19 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point shall be inserted after point 66xd (Commission Decision 2011/121/EU) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘66xe. | 32014 D 0132: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU of 11 March 2014 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network and alert thresholds for the second reference period 2015-19 (OJ L 71, 12.3.2014, p. 20).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘66xe.

32014 D 0132: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU of 11 March 2014 setting the Union-wide performance targets for the air traffic management network and alert thresholds for the second reference period 2015-19 (OJ L 71, 12.3.2014, p. 20).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision 2014/132/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee incorporating Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 71, 12.3.2014, p. 20.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 390/2013 of 3 May 2013 laying down a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions (OJ L 128, 9.5.2013, p. 1).

2

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,365

EX PARTE JOSE ZAMARRIPA ALVARADO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2008CRS589-D4 IN THE 406 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM WEBB COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of indecency with

a child and sentenced to eleven years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he

failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings

of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We
2

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in Cause No. 2008CRS589-D4 from the 406th Judicial District Court of

Webb County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of

appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Delivered: June 16, 2010

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathi
A. Anderson, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      9, 2009
            By: /s/ Katherine A.
    AndersonKatherine
      A. AndersonChief
      Accounting OfficerRepros
      Therapeutics Inc.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Repros and will be retained by Repros and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1915. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §604(d), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1577

Section, Pub. L. 100–220, title II, §2204, Dec. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 1466; Pub. L. 104–324, title VIII, §802(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3945, related to creation of a plastic pollution public education program.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-036 June 23, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC, VIRGINIA COMPANY TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF INSPECTION

 A Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection conducted in April that identified a series of

low-level violations for a Virginia company licensed to use portable nuclear gauges will be discussed

by NRC staff and representatives of the firm on Wednesday, June 29.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. at the NRC’s

Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. There will be an opportunity for members

of the public to ask questions of NRC staff before the session is adjourned.

 On April 4, 5 and 6, an NRC inspector traveled to several branch offices in Virginia

operated by CTI Consultants, Inc., based in Ruckersville, Va. In addition, the inspector visited several

field sites in Virginia where CTI had nuclear gauges in use. (Nuclear gauges contain radioactive

material and are used for such industrial purposes as measuring soil density.)

 Based on these inspections, the NRC has identified a number of Severity Level IV violations

on the part of CTI, including: a failure to perform an annual audit of its radiation safety program; a

failure to perform leak tests on some of its nuclear gauges; a failure to properly label and secure nuclear

gauges during transportation; and a failure to ensure all employees received the required training. 

Severity Level IV is the lowest of the four levels used to capture the significance of cited violations.

 The June 29 meeting was scheduled because of the number of violations and because several

violations were repeats of earlier infractions. The violations were described in a Notice of Violation

sent to the company on May 25.

 At the meeting, NRC staff and CTI representatives will discuss the results of the inspection

and corrective actions either already undertaken or planned by the company to preclude a recurrence of

violations. 

 ###
<PAGE>

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>


                                                                                                                      Exhibit 8.1

                                                       SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

Significant Subsidiary                            Jurisdiction of Incorporation               Business Name
<S>                                               <C>                                     <C>
TV Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                                       Mexico                       TV Azteca
Television Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                               Mexico                       Television Azteca
Grupo TV Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                                 Mexico                       Grupo TV Azteca
Azteca Digital, S.A. de C.V.                                  Mexico                       Azteca Digital
Red Azteca Internacional, S.A. de C.V.                        Mexico                       Red Azteca Internacional
Azteca International Corporation                              Delaware                     Azteca America
Unefon, S.A. de C.V.                                          Mexico                       Unefon

</CAPTION>
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1674 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1674

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the vaccine 
       excise tax shall apply to any vaccine against hepatitis A.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2003

Mr. Lewis of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the vaccine 
       excise tax shall apply to any vaccine against hepatitis A.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VACCINE TAX TO APPLY TO HEPATITIS A VACCINE.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 4132(a) (defining taxable 
vaccine) is amended by redesignating subparagraphs (I), (J), (K), and 
(L) as subparagraphs (J), (K), (L), and (M), respectively, and by 
inserting after subparagraph (H) the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(I) Any vaccine against hepatitis A.''
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) Sales.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
        to vaccine sales after the date of the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Deliveries.--For purposes of subparagraph (A), in the 
        case of sales on or before the date of the enactment of this 
        Act for which delivery is made after such date, the delivery 
        date shall be considered the sale date.
                                 <all>
```
### §2268. Marine technology review

#### (a) Dredging needs

The Secretary is authorized to conduct such studies as are necessary to provide a report to Congress on the dredging needs of the national ports and harbors of the United States. The report shall include existing and projected future project depths, types and sizes of ships in use, and world trade patterns, an assessment of the future national waterside infrastructure needs, and a comparison of drafts of United States and selected world ports.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated $2,500,000 to carry out this section for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1992. Such sums shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 102–580, title IV, §402, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4862.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 3 of Pub. L. 102–580, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.