alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Amendment to TI's Supplemental Pension Plan



  
 Exhibit 10(b)(v)

  
 FOURTH AMENDMENT 
  
 TO 
  
 TI SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 
  
 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation with its principal offices in Dallas, Texas, hereby adopts this Fourth Amendment to the TI
Supplemental Pension Plan (the “Plan”). This Fourth Amendment to the Plan shall be effective immediately. Except as hereby amended by this Fourth Amendment, the Plan, as previously amended, shall continue in full force and effect.

  
 The First sentence of section 5-2 is amended and restated in
its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “The Plan shall be
administered by an Administrator or Administrators appointed by the Compensation Committee or its delegate.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Texas Instruments Incorporated has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 21st day of November, 2003. 
  

			
	 	 	 Texas Instruments Incorporated

		
	 By:
	 	/s/    STEPHEN H. LEVEN        
	 	 	

	 	 	Stephen H. Leven
		
	 Its:
	 	Senior Vice President-Human Resources
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2
                    RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Lauren Farrell, Chief Financial Officer of Ambient Corporation, (the
"Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2004.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's 2004 fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


March 31, 2005

                /S/ LAUREN FARRELL
                LAUREN FARRELL
                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

        In connection with the Annual Report of Ambient Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the Year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, Chief
Executive Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



MARCH 30, 2004                          /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                                      ---------------------------
                                      JOHN J. JOYCE
                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                      (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO AMBIENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY AMBIENT CORPORATION AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
### §623. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(57), 65 Stat. 703

Section, act Aug. 11, 1888, ch. 860, §3, 25 Stat. 423, related to letting of contracts to lowest responsible bidder.
#### § 4101.106 Restrictions arising from the employment of relatives.

When the spouse of a covered employee, or other relative who is dependent on or resides with a covered employee, is employed in a position that the employee would be prohibited from occupying by § 4101.108(a), the employee shall file a report of family member employment with his or her immediate supervisor, the ethics liaison in his or her office, and the DAEO on a form prescribed by the DAEO. Notice shall be made as soon as possible after learning about employment already in existence or in advance of known prospective employment. The employee shall be disqualified from participation in any matter involving the employee's spouse or relative, or the employing entity, unless the DAEO authorizes the employee to participate in the matter using the standard in § 2635.502(d) of the Executive Branch-wide Standards.
SCWC-18-0000502

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

DWIGHT J. VICENTE, 

Petitioner/Claimant-Appellant-Appellant,

vs.

HILO MEDICAL INVESTORS, LTD., 

Respondent/Employer-Appellee-Appellee,

and

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY/AIG CLAIMS SERVICES,

Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee, and JOHN MULLEN & COMPANY,

INC., Respondent/Insurance Carrier-Appellee. 

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000502; CASE NO. AB 2015-259(H)(S); DCD NO. 1-87-00882)

ORDER DENYING “MOTION TO RECONSIDER”

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

On June 12, 2019, petitioner/claimant-appellant Dwight J.

Vicente filed a “Motion to Reconsider,” in which he asks this

court to reconsider the June 5, 2019 order rejecting his

application for writ of certiorari. A rejection of an

application for writ of certiorari, however, is not subject to

reconsideration. See HRAP Rule 40.1(h) (“Neither acceptance nor

rejection of an application for a writ of certiorari shall be

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000502

20-JUN-2019

09:06 AM
subject to a motion for reconsideration in the supreme court. 

The rejection of an application for certiorari shall be final.”). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the “Motion to Reconsider” is

denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 20, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE
CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN LAMSON        
|                        |  |  |  | John Lamson            
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
### §37. Nodaway River, Missouri

Nodaway River, in the counties of Andrew, Holt, and Nodaway, in the State of Missouri, is declared to be not a navigable water of the United States within the meaning of the laws enacted by Congress for the preservation and protection of such waters.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(Feb. 15, 1910, ch. 32, §§1, 2, 36 Stat. 194.)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 10, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 10, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0825. ROSANN MARTIN v. WALMART STORES, INC. et al.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
§ 353.110 OPM placement assistance. ( a ) *Employee returning from uniformed service.* ( 1 ) OPM will offer placement in the executive branch to the following categories of employees upon notification by the agency and application by the employee: (Such notification should be sent to the Associate Director for Employment, OPM, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415.) ( i ) Executive branch employees (other than an employee of an intelligence agency) when *OPM determines* that: ( A ) their agencies no longer exist and the functions have not been transferred, or;
( B ) it is otherwise impossible or unreasonable for their former agencies to place them;
( ii ) Legislative and judicial branch employees when *their employers* determine that it is impossible or unreasonable to reemploy them;
( iii ) National Guard technicians when the Adjutant General of a State determines that it is impossible or unreasonable to reemploy a technician otherwise eligible for restoration under 38 U.S.C. 4304 and 4312 (pertaining to character and length of service), and the technician is a noncareer military member who was separated invountarily from the Guard for reasons beyond his or her control; and
( iv ) Employees of the intelligence agencies (defined in 5 U.S.C. 2302(a)(2)(C)(ii)) when *their agencies* determine that it is impossible or unreasonable to reemploy them.
( 2 ) OPM will determine if a vacant position equivalent (in terms of pay, grade, and status) to the one the individual left exists, for which the individual is qualified, in the commuting area in which he or she was employed immediately before entering the uniformed services. If such a vacancy exists, OPM will order the agency to place the individual. If no such position is available, the individual may elect to be placed in a lesser position in the commuting area, or OPM will attempt to place the individual in an equivalent position in another geographic location determined by OPM. If the individual declines an offer of equivalent employment, he or she has no further restoration rights.
( b ) Employee returning from compensable injury. OPM will provide placement assistance to an employee with restoration rights in the executive, legislative, or judicial branches who cannot be placed in his or her former agency and who either has competitive status or is eligible to acquire it under 5 U.S.C. 3304(C). If the employee's agency is abolished and its functions are not transferred, or it is not possible for the employee to be restored in his or her former agency, the employee is eligible for placement assistance under the Interagency Career Transition Assistance Plan (ICTAP) under part 330, subpart G, of this chapter. This paragraph does not apply to an employee serving under a temporary appointment pending establishment of a register (TAPER).
[60 FR 45652, Sept. 1, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 31487, June 11, 1999; 66 FR 29897, June 4, 2001]
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-07-033                                             May 24, 2007CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416      E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NOTE TO EDITORS

NRC CHAIRMAN TO SPEAK IN MIAMI FRIDAY MORNING ON AGENCYPREPARATIONS TO RECEIVE NEW REACTOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS

EDITORS/NEWS EDITORS:

       Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Dale Klein will address the Nuclear Energy Assemblyon Friday in Miami at the Fairmont Turnberry Isle Resort, located at 19999 W. Country Club Dr. inAventura on the challenges the agency faces as it prepares to receive applications for new reactorlicenses.

Klein will speak from 8:30 a.m. until 9:15 a.m. and will be available to talk to news mediarepresentatives at 10:00 a.m.  A text of his remarks will be available.

NRC Commissioners Jeffrey Merrifield and Peter Lyons will also attend the meeting.

News media representatives in Miami and South Florida who may wish to interview ChairmanKlein and/or Commissioners Merrifield or Lyons should contact NRC Director of Public Affairs EliotBrenner at (240) 888-2923.

###
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARICELA VALENCIA ALVAREZ; et 

al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

 Respondent.

No. 22-973

Agency Nos.

A206-267-096

A209-168-990

A206-267-097

A206-267-098

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 17, 2024**

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Maricela Valencia Alvarez and her children, natives and citizens of Mexico, 

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing 

their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-973

asylum, and Valencia Alvarez’s applications for withholding of removal and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction 

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual 

findings. Conde Quevedo v. Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We 

review de novo questions of law. Id. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that petitioners

failed to establish they were or would be persecuted on account of a proposed 

particular social group related to family. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 

483 (1992) (an applicant “must provide some evidence of [motive], direct or 

circumstantial”); see also Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) 

(an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft 

or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). 

Because petitioners do not challenge the agency’s determination regarding a 

proposed particular social group related to small business owners, we do not 

address it. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013). 

Thus, petitioners’ asylum claim fails.

Because Valencia Alvarez failed to establish any nexus at all, she also failed 

to satisfy the standard for withholding of removal. See Barajas-Romero v. Lynch, 

846 F.3d 351, 359-60 (9th Cir. 2017). 
3 22-973

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection 

because Valencia Alvarez failed to show it is more likely than not she will be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to

Mexico. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no 

likelihood of torture).

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### §476. Restrictions on tanker traffic in Puget Sound and adjacent waters

(a) The Congress finds that—

(1) the navigable waters of Puget Sound in the State of Washington, and the natural resources therein, are a fragile and important national asset;

(2) Puget Sound and the shore area immediately adjacent thereto is threatened by increased domestic and international traffic of tankers carrying crude oil in bulk which increases the possibility of vessel collisions and oil spills; and

(3) it is necessary to restrict such tanker traffic in Puget Sound in order to protect the navigable waters thereof, the natural resources therein, and the shore area immediately adjacent thereto, from environmental harm.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and after October 18, 1977, no officer, employee, or other official of the Federal Government shall, or shall have authority to, issue, renew, grant, or otherwise approve any permit, license, or other authority for constructing, renovating, modifying, or otherwise altering a terminal, dock, or other facility in, on, or immediately adjacent to, or affecting the navigable waters of Puget Sound, or any other navigable waters in the State of Washington east of Port Angeles, which will or may result in any increase in the volume of crude oil capable of being handled at any such facility (measured as of October 18, 1977), other than oil to be refined for consumption in the State of Washington.

(Pub. L. 95–136, §5, Oct. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1168.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

###### Disaster Declaration #15742 and #15743; Florida Disaster Number FL-00140

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4399-DR), dated 10/11/2018.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Michael.                    

*Incident Period:*                         10/07/2018 through 10/19/2018.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 12/07/2018.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/17/2018.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/11/2019.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of FLORIDA, dated 10/11/2018, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 12/17/2018.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2018-27371 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
§ 1639.26 Special review. ( a ) An employee subject to salary offset or a voluntary repayment agreement in connection with a debt owed to the Board may, at any time, request that the Board conduct a special review of the amount of the salary offset or voluntary payment, based on materially changed circumstances, such as catastrophic illness, divorce, death, or disability.
( b ) To assist the Board in determining whether an offset would prevent the employee from meeting essential subsistence expenses (costs incurred for food, housing, clothing, transportation, and medical care), the employee will submit a detailed statement and supporting documents for the employee, his or her spouse, and dependents, indicating: ( 1 ) Income from all sources;
( 2 ) Assets;
( 3 ) Liabilities;
( 4 ) Number of dependents;
( 5 ) Expenses for food, housing, clothing, and transportation;
( 6 ) Medical expenses; and
( 7 ) Exceptional expenses, if any.
( c ) If the employee requests a special review under this section, the employee must file an alternative proposed salary offset or payment schedule and a statement, with supporting documents, showing why the current salary offset or payments result in an extreme financial hardship to the employee.
( d ) The Executive Director will evaluate the statement and supporting documents, and determine whether the original offset or repayment schedule imposes an extreme financial hardship on the employee. The Executive Director will notify the employee in writing of his determination, including, if appropriate, a revised offset or payment schedule.
( e ) If the special review results in a revised offset or repayment schedule, the Board will provide a new certification to the paying agency.
### §861a. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section, act May 18, 1920, ch. 190, §12, 41 Stat. 604, related to transportation for families of officers and enlisted men on permanent change of station.