alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS 

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-140 November 4, 2004

NRC RESTORES VARIOUS DOCUMENTS 

REMOVED FROM WEB SITE FOR SECURITY REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has restored various documents that were temporarily

removed from its web site Oct. 25 for an additional security review. These documents are related to a

possible application for a high-level waste repository. The remainder of the restoration will proceed in

a phased manner, based on priorities and feasibility, with large portions of the information expected to

be restored in the next several weeks.

The Oct. 25 suspension of public access to documents on ADAMS, the NRC’s on-line

document library, took place when documents were identified on that library that could possibly aid

terrorists. The agency concluded that this finding warranted a temporary suspension of public access

while the agency conducted a review to determine if other documents were present containing

information such as drawings of site layouts. 

Most documents removed were located on ADAMS, which is accessible through the NRC web

site at www.nrc.gov . Many other documents on the web site have remained available, allowing the

public to participate in the majority of the Commission’s ongoing regulatory activities. For example,

access to the majority of rulemaking documents has continued to be available via the Ruleforum

website, which was not affected by the ADAMS shutdown.

“The Commission is committed to conducting its work in the open to protect public health,

safety, and security while maintaining appropriate accessibility to its activities,” said NRC Chairman

Nils J. Diaz. “However, we will withhold any information that could be useful, or could reasonably be

expected to be useful, to a terrorist.”

NRC yesterday restored references to the staff’s document collection in its electronic Licensing

Support Network (www.lsnnet.gov ) for a possible application for a high-level waste repository. 

(Documents from other potential parties to a Yucca Mountain hearing remained available through the

Licensing Support Network during the period while NRC links were removed.) High-level waste

documents on the electronic hearing docket (located at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ehd.html#2 )

have also been restored for public access.
-2-

The agency expects to restore the remaining documents, in the following priority order, over the

next few weeks: 

• Additional hearing-related documents (i.e., non-high-level waste) 

• Time-sensitive documents related to opportunities for hearing or needed for public

reviews and comments, including license amendment applications

• Other nuclear reactor documents, and other documents not related to specific facilities,

in ADAMS

Restoration of documents dealing with nuclear materials (i.e., non-reactor documents) is

expected to take longer. 

###
§ 1820.5 Responses to requests. ( a ) *General.* Ordinarily, OSC has twenty (20) business days from receipt to determine whether to grant or deny a FOIA request. ( 1 ) In unusual circumstances, OSC may extend the twenty (20) business-day deadline by written notice to the requestor setting forth the unusual circumstances justifying the extension. OSC shall notify the requestor if OSC cannot process the request in 20 days and provide the requestor an opportunity to modify the request so that OSC can process the request within the 20-day time limit. OSC and the requestor can also negotiate an alternative time frame for processing the request or modified request. OSC's FOIA Public Liaison is available to assist in the resolution of any disputes between the requestor and OSC. OSC must also advise the requestor of the requestor's right to seek dispute resolution services from the National Archives and Records Administration's (NARA) Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). OSC may consider a requestor's refusal to reasonably modify the request or to negotiate an alternative time frame as a factor in determining whether unusual and/or exceptional circumstances exist.
( 2 ) *Unusual circumstances* means— ( i ) The need to search for and collect the requested records from OSC field offices, NARA storage facilities, or other locations away from OSC's FOIA office;
( ii ) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records demanded in a single request; or
( iii ) The need for consultation and/or referral with another OSC unit where the information concerns two or more components of OSC or with a Federal entity that has an interest in the information requested.
( 3 ) *Exceptional circumstances* means— ( i ) OSC has a backlog of pending requests and is making reasonable progress in reducing the backlog; and
( ii ) OSC estimates a search yield of more than 5000 pages.
( b ) OSC will notify the requestor in writing of its determination to grant or deny in full or in part a FOIA request.
( c ) *Adverse determinations.* Adverse determinations, or denials of requests, consist of: A determination to withhold any requested record in whole or in part; that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; that a record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought by the requestor; that the request does not seek a record subject to the FOIA; a determination on any disputed fee matter; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment. A notification to a requestor of an adverse determination on a request shall include: ( 1 ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial of the request, including any FOIA exemption applied by OSC in denying the request; and
( 2 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 1820.6(a), with a description of the requirements of that subsection.
( d ) *Dispute resolution program.* OSC shall inform FOIA requestors at all stages of the FOIA process of the availability of dispute resolution services provided by the FOIA Public Liaison or by NARA's OGIS.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-016 April 7, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT 

HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT TO REVIEW SHUTDOWN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II office in Atlanta will conduct a special

inspection at the Hatch nuclear power plant, operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company near

Baxley, Ga., to assess the circumstances surrounding an unplanned reactor shutdown at Hatch Unit 2

on April 5.

The April 5th shutdown was initiated by a maintenance error during testing on the Unit 2 turbine

generator. During that shutdown, condenser vacuum significantly decreased in part due to the

operators having to manually control part of the operation because some automatic equipment had not

been repaired after the last refueling outage. 

The condenser in a nuclear power plant condenses and recovers the steam that passes through

the turbine. The steam turning the turbine at a boiling-water reactor plant such as Hatch is heated in

the reactor itself and returned to the reactor once it is condensed. All power plants, including coalfired plants, that use steam as the driving force for the turbine generator use a condenser. During a

nuclear plant shutdown, maintaining a vacuum in the condenser allows plant operators to use

additional sources of water and heat removal. Any loss of that capability may result in the necessity to

use backup plant systems for cooling.

The NRC inspectors will assess the sequence of events, the plant staff’s response, any

corrective actions and any possible generic safety implications. 

The two inspectors involved in the special inspection are the NRC Senior Resident Inspector at

the Hatch plant and a Senior Resident Inspector from another plant. The two inspectors are expected

to complete their on-site review the week of April 10th and the results of the inspection will be issued

within 45 days of its completion. 

###
### §923. Procedure before deputy commissioner or Board

(a) In making an investigation or inquiry or conducting a hearing the deputy commissioner or Board shall not be bound by common law or statutory rules of evidence or by technical or formal rules of procedure, except as provided by this chapter; but may make such investigation or inquiry or conduct such hearing in such manner as to best ascertain the rights of the parties. Declarations of a deceased employee concerning the injury in respect of which the investigation or inquiry is being made or the hearing conducted shall be received in evidence and shall, if corroborated by other evidence, be sufficient to establish the injury.

(b) Hearings before a deputy commissioner or Board shall be open to the public and shall be stenographically reported, and the deputy commissioners or Board, subject to the approval of the Secretary, are authorized to contract for the reporting of such hearings. The Secretary shall by regulation provide for the preparation of a record of the hearings and other proceedings before the deputy commissioners or Board.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 509, §23, 44 Stat. 1437; Pub. L. 92–576, §15(e), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1262; Pub. L. 98–426, §27(a)(2), Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1654.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–426 substituted "Secretary" for "commission". See Transfer of Functions note set out under section 902 of this title.

1972—Pub. L. 92–576 inserted references to the Board in subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–426 effective Sept. 28, 1984, see section 28(e)(1) of Pub. L. 98–426, set out as a note under section 901 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1972 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 92–576 effective 30 days after Oct. 27, 1972, see section 22 of Pub. L. 92–576, set out as a note under section 902 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.40

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         I, Li Dong, citizen of the People's Republic of China (the " PRC"), the
Identity Card number 310105197409142816, hereby irrevocably assigns Mr. Yang Lei
the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney:

         I hereby assigns Yang Lei to vote on my behalf at the shareholders'
meetings of Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. and exercise the full voting
rights as the shareholder of the company as have been given to me by law and
under the Articles of Association of the company, including but not limited to,
the right to sell or transfer any or all of the shares of Shanghai Weilan
Computer Co., Ltd. held by myself and designate and appoint the directors and
the general manager etc of Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. acting as my
authorized representative on the shareholders' meeting of the company.

         Such authorization is based upon the condition that Yang Lei is acting
as an employee of Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd and Shanghai Linktone
Consulting Co., Ltd agrees such authorization and designation. Once Yang Lei
loses his title or position in Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. or
Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. issues a written notice to dismiss or
replace the designated/authorized person, I will withdraw such authorization to
him immediately and designate/authorize other individual employed by Shanghai
Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd. to exercise the full voting rights on behalf of
myself at the shareholders' meetings of Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd.

         The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years unless the early
termination of Operation Agreement jointly executed by Shanghai Shanghai
Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd., Hu Ankai and
me by any reason, commencing from the execution date of this Power of Attorney.
This Power of Attorney is executed by Chinese and English, and in case of
confliction, the Chinese version is prevail.

                                                          Signature: /s/ Li Dong

                                                               27 November, 2003
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF
2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, YIN Mingde, General Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 28, 2014



By:

/S/    Yin
MingdeName:

Yin MingdeTitle:

General Manager


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0195  - Rulemaking Plan: Clarification of NRC Civil Penalty Authority Over Contractors and Subcontractors who Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities (RM #636)

Accession Number: ML042870105

Date Released: Monday, November 8, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML042740294 - SECY-04-0195 - Rulemaking Plan: Clarification of NRC Civil Penalty Authority Over Contractors and Subcontractors who Discriminate Against Employees for Engaging in Protected Activities (RM #636) (4 page(s), 10/21/2004)
    - ML042870110 - SECY-04-0195 Attachment - Proposed Rulemaking Plan (3 page(s), 10/21/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 3, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00848

- CR

Eusebio CASTILLO

, Jr.

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR5376A Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding



### ORDE R

This court has received notice that appellant died on April 1, 2019. Because this appeal was perfected before appellant’s death, and we have not yet issued a mandate, it is ORDERED that this appeal is PERMANENTLY ABATED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 7.1(a)(2); Vargas v. State

, 659 S.W.2d 422, 423 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983).

Additionally, appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw

. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of July, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
NRC

NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-072 December 8, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov 

Victoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

REVISED

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO DISCUSS DAVIS-BESSE 

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s staff will meet with FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating

Company officials on Wednesday, December 10, to discuss the utility’s plans for improvements to its

implementation of the corrective action program at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant. The plant,

which has been shut down since February 16 of last year, is located in Oak Harbor, Ohio. 

The meeting will be held at 9 a.m. CST (10 a.m. EST) at the NRC’s Region III office, 801

Warrenville Road, in Lisle, Illinois. Visitors should report first to the Second Floor reception area. 

The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and will have an opportunity to

make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

Interested individuals unable to attend may listen to the meeting via telephone. The toll-free

number will be announced when it is available and posted on the NRC web site. The meeting will also

be available for public viewing by video conference at the NRC Headquarters, Room T-2B5 One

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The meeting will be transcribed, and

the transcript will be posted on the NRC website in several weeks.

At the meeting FirstEnergy will describe planned improvements in the corrective action

program as a result of the NRC’s Corrective Action Team Inspection which reviewed the company’s

program to find and fix problems at the Davis-Besse plant. The preliminary results of the inspection

were discussed during the November 12 public meeting between the NRC Davis-Besse Oversight

Panel and FirstEnergy, and the report is in preparation.

The Oversight Panel requested the December 10 meeting as part of its ongoing review of the

findings of the inspection. During the November 12 meeting, FirstEnergy provided general

information addressing the inspection findings. The Panel is seeking additional details and

clarification of the company’s plans to improve the corrective action program. 
The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29 of last year, includes NRC management and staff

from its Region III office in Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland; and

the NRC Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.

# # #
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the interim quarterly report, pursuant to section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc., on
Form 10-QSB dated for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

July 30, 2007

By: /s/ Clive de Larrabeiti
   ----------------------------------
      Clive de Larrabeiti

President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit
32.1




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO)




YUHE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Yuhe International, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gao Zhentao, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
October 15,
2010




/s/
      Gao ZhentaoGao
      ZhentaoChief
      Executive Officer
**Certification**

I, William J. Doré, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and15d-15 (f)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b)      Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;

c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

May 10, 2006

 /S/WILLIAM J. DORE'                                  William J. Doré                       Chief Executive Officer