alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data used to determine the

cost factors for the bottom ash MDS wet sluicing O&M costs is considered CBI or CBI deducible.
### §39. Ollala Slough, Oregon

All of that portion of Ollala Slough in Lincoln County, Oregon, above a point where a line that is one hundred and twenty rods south and running east and west and parallel with the section line between sections 8 and 17 in township 11 south, range 10 west of the Willamette meridian, crosses said stream, is declared to be a nonnavigable stream.

(Feb. 26, 1917, ch. 119, 39 Stat. 937.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:

 

1)              The Registrant’s quarterly report on Form10-Q (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2)              The information contained in the Reportfairly presents in all material respects the results of operations of theRegistrant for the periods covered by the Report and the Registrant’s financialcondition as of the end of those periods.

 
| Date: November 7, 2003 | /s/ Nancy J. Baker                      |   |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cymer,Inc. and will be retained by Cymer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**72 KA 12-02053** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PERCY L. SCOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered June 16, 2009. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered March 28, 2014, decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings (115 AD3d 1342). The proceedings were held and completed.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 125.25 [1]). We conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant youthful offender status ( see People v Johnson , 109 AD3d 1191, 1191-1192, lv denied 22 NY3d 997; People v Davis , 84 AD3d 1710, 1710, lv denied 17 NY3d 815), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender ( cf. People v Noel , 106 AD2d 854, 854-855). Further, although defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence because he entered the waiver before he was advised of the maximum sentence he could receive ( see People v Rizek [appeal No. 1], 64 AD3d 1180, 1180, lv denied 13 NY3d 862), we nevertheless reject that challenge.

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### subpart 2—education and training for judges and court personnel in federal courts
### §5154. State taxation

A State or a territory or possession of the United States may tax United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) as money on hand or on deposit in the same way and at the same rate that the State, territory, or possession taxes other forms of money. This section does not affect a law taxing national banks.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 992; Pub. L. 97–452, §1(22), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2477.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5154 | 31:425, 426. | Aug. 13, 1894, ch. 281, 28 Stat. 278. |

The words "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks)" are substituted for "Circulating notes of national banking associations and United States legal tender notes and other notes and certificates of the United States payable on demand and circulating or intended to circulate as currency and gold, silver, or other coin" in 31:425 to eliminate unnecessary words and for consistency with section 5103 of the revised title.

#### 1983 Act

This restates 31:5154 to clarify the intent of the section. See 26 Cong. Rec. 7152, 7170 (1894).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 97–452 substituted "other forms of money" for "United States coins and currency circulating within its jurisdiction".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1983 Amendment

Amendment effective Sept. 13, 1982, see section 2(i) of Pub. L. 97–452, set out as a note under section 3331 of this title.
| **Intel demos dual core, uncorks Napa**01:55PM**News in RSS**  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Byung-Moo Park, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of
     hanarotelecom incorporated (the "Company").

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
         by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
         covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control
         over financial reporting.

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
         control over financial reporting.



Date: August 10, 2006

  /s/ Byung-Moo Park
------------------------------------
Byung-Moo Park
Chief Executive Officer and Representative Director
#### § 353.210 Department of Labor assistance to applicants and employees.

USERRA requires the Department of Labor's Veterans' Employment and Training Service [VETS] to provide employment and reemployment assistance to any Federal employee or applicant who requests it. VETS staff will attempt to resolve employment disputes brought to investigate. If dispute resolution proves unsuccessful, VETS will, at the request of the employee, refer the matter to the Office of the Special Counsel for representation before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

[64 FR 31487, June 11, 1999]
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0617-0619 SAT Date: 7/2/2013 Print Date: 8/2/2013
Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl Keywords : Keywords: UNCERT-SENS-RESPIRATORY Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0617-19 FATE:
S = Reacts Hydrolysis half-life = hr-da VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt > moSorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl
Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. There is uncertain concern for respiratory sensitization for any lower molecular weight isocyanates. Low moderate concern.
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _
Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r -nonionic- N CO; p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *
SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic- N CO Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: Becky Jones
§ 2634.403 General description of trusts. ( a ) *Qualified blind trust.* ( 1 ) The qualified blind trust is the most universally adaptable qualified trust. An interested party may put most types of assets (such as cash, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or real estate) into a qualified blind trust.
( 2 ) In the case of a qualified blind trust, 18 U.S.C. 208 and other Federal conflict of interest statutes and regulations apply to the assets that an interested party transfers to the trust until such time as he or she is notified by the independent trustee that such asset has been disposed of or has a value of less than $1,000. Because the interested party knows what assets he or she placed in the trust and there is no requirement that these assets be diversified, the possibility still exists that the interested party could be influenced in the performance of official duties by those interests.
( b ) *Qualified diversified trust.* ( 1 ) An interested party may put only readily marketable securities into a qualified diversified trust. In addition, the portfolio must meet the diversification requirements of § 2634.406(b)(2).
( 2 ) In the case of a qualified diversified trust, the conflict of interest laws do not apply to the assets that an interested party transfers to the trust. Because the assets that an interested party puts into this trust must meet the diversification requirements set forth in this part, the diversification achieves “blindness” with regard to the initial assets.
( 3 ) *Special notice for Presidential appointees* — ( i ) *In general.* In any case in which the establishment of a qualified diversified trust is contemplated with respect to an individual whose nomination is being considered by a Senate committee, that individual must inform the committee of the intention to establish a qualified diversified trust at the time of filing a financial disclosure report with the committee.
( ii ) *Applicability.* Paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section is not applicable to members of the uniformed services or Foreign Service officers. The special notice requirement of this section will not preclude an individual from seeking the certification of a qualified blind trust or qualified diversified trust after the Senate has given its advice and consent to a nomination.
( c ) *Conflict of interest laws.* In the case of each type of trust, the conflict of interest laws do not apply to the assets that the independent trustee or any other designated fiduciary adds to the trust.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXIII—ADULT AND JUVENILE COLLABORATION PROGRAM GRANTS
#### Marx & Rawolle, Respondent, v. American Druggists Syndicate, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on authority of *Marx & Rawolle*v. *American Druggists Syndicate*(161 App. Div. 950). Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
#### § 353.204 Notice to employer.

To be entitled to restoration rights under this part, an employee (or an appropriate officer of the uniformed service in which service is to be performed) must give the employer advance written or verbal notice of the service except that no notice is required if it is precluded by military necessity or, under all relevant circumstances, the giving of notice is otherwise impossible or unreasonable.
§ 295.101 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This part sets forth policies and procedures you must follow when you submit a demand or request to an employee of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to produce official records and information, or provide testimony relating to official information, in connection with a legal proceeding. You must comply with these requirements when you request the release or disclosure of official records and information.
( b ) OPM intends these provisions to: ( 1 ) Promote economy and efficiency in its programs and operations;
( 2 ) Minimize the possibility of involving OPM in controversial issues not related to our functions;
( 3 ) Prevent the misuse of OPM employees as involuntary expert witnesses for private interests or as inappropriate expert witnesses as to the state of the law;
( 4 ) Maintain OPM's impartiality among private litigants where neither OPM nor any other Federal entity is a named party; and
( 5 ) Protect sensitive, confidential information and the deliberative processes of OPM.
( c ) In providing for these requirements, OPM does not waive the sovereign immunity of the United States.
( d ) This part provides guidance for the internal operations of OPM. It does not create any right or benefits, substantive or procedural, that a party may rely upon in any legal proceeding against the United States.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0109 - Final Rulemaking to Add New Section 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors."

Accession Number: ML041170141

Date Released: Thursday, July 8, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML041030062 - SECY-04-0109 - Attachment 1 - Final Rulemaking to Add New Section 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components." (9 page(s), 6/30/2004)
    - ML041330078 - (2) Final Rule - Section 50.69 "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Plants. (2 page(s), 5/17/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### The People of the State of New York v. Morris Iser. The People of the State of New York v. Agnes Smith. The People of the State of New York v. Charles A. Ohlson.

Motions granted unless appellants comply with terms stated in orders. Present—Ingraham, P..J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 294.301 Policy and interpretations. ( a ) Statements of Office policy and interpretations of the laws and regulations administered by the Office which the Office has adopted, whether or not published in the Federal Register, are available to the public.
( b ) Generally, memoranda, correspondence, opinions, data, staff studies, information received in confidence, and similar documentary material, when prepared for the purpose of internal communication within the Office or between the Office and other agencies, organizations, or persons, are not available to the public.
[50 FR 3310, Jan. 24, 1985, as amended at 66 FR 66710, Dec. 27, 2001]
#### § 2610.306 Settlement.

The applicant and agency counsel may agree on a proposed settlement of the award before final action on the application, either in connection with a settlement of the underlying proceeding, or after the underlying proceeding has been concluded, in accordance with the settlement procedure applicable to the underlying procedure. If an eligible prevailing party and agency counsel agree on a proposed settlement of an award before an application has been filed, the application shall be filed with the proposed settlement.
#### § 1202.1 Designating Chairman of Statutory Review Board.

At the written request of the Department of Transportation, the Chairman of the Board will designate a presiding official of the Board to serve as the Chairman of any Board of Review established by the Secretary of Transportation under 5 U.S.C. 3383(b) to review certain actions to remove air traffic controllers.

[54 FR 28658, July 6, 1989]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-3 No.'s 333-41419-99, 333-70151, 333-70255 and 333-
64463), the Registration Statement of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No. 333-
70345) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock Option Plan, and
1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, and the Registration Statement of United
Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No. 333-74091) pertaining to the options outstanding in
connection with the 1997 Performance Award Plan of U.S. Rentals assumed pursuant
to the merger with U.S. Rentals, of our report dated February 17, 1999, except
for Note 17, as to which the date is February 26, 1999 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of United Rentals, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.  

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of United Rentals (North America), Inc. (Form S-4 No. 333-74275) of our report
dated February 17, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
United Rentals (North America), Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



MetroPark, New Jersey
March 25, 1999
§ 332.312 Applicants in military or overseas service. Subject to the time limits and other conditions published by OPM in its operating manuals, the following persons are entitled to file applications for open competitive examinations after the closing date for receipt of applications when there is an existing register or a register about to be established: ( a ) A person who could not file an application during the filing period, or appear for an assembled examination, because of military service, or hospitalization continuing for 1 year or less following discharge from military service;
( b ) An employee of the Federal Government who, as a member of a reserve unit of the military service, could not file an application during the filing period, or appear for an assembled examination, because of active duty beyond 15 days with the military service even though the duty is designated for training purposes; and
( c ) A United States citizen who could not file an application during the filing period, or appear for an assembled examination, because of overseas service with a Federal agency or with an international organization in which the United States Government participates.
[33 FR 12426, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 66 FR 66710, Dec. 27, 2001]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0512

_________________ CHARLES J. HERINGER, III, as the Trustee of the CHARLES J. HERINGER, III, Trust, dated May 20, 1999, as Amended and Restated; SHAWN A. SCHAFFER and KRISTY M. SCHAFFER; MICHAEL A. D iFRONZO; TRACIE E. PABST; MOOSE 59, LLC; and MOOSE DROOL PROPERTIES, LLC,

Plaint iffs and Appellants, v. BARNEGAT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC; RZLDZL, LLC; and John and Jane Does 1 - 10;

Defendants and Appellee s. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Rienne McElyea , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 3 2021

03/03/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0512
#### § 300.601 Purpose.

The restrictions in this subpart are intended to prevent excessively rapid promotions in competitive service General Schedule positions and to protect competitive principles. They provide a budgetary control on promotion rates and help assure that appointments are made from appropriate registers. These restrictions are in addition to the eligibility requirements for promotion in part 335 of this chapter.
#### § 1209.13 Referral of findings to the Special Counsel.

When the Board determines in a proceeding under this part that there is reason to believe that a current Federal employee may have committed a prohibited personnel practice described at 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8) or (b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D), the Board will refer the matter to the Special Counsel to investigate and take appropriate action under 5 U.S.C. 1215.

[78 FR 39548, July 2, 2013]
Carroll,

Dec., 1897.

#### Conway Savings Bank *v.*Dow *& a.*

*John C. L. Wood,*for the plaintiffs.

*Worcester, Gafney £ Snow*and *John B. Nash,*for the defendants.

Chase, J.

The question reserved is decided in *Conway Savings Bank*v. *Dow, ante, p.*228.

*Case discharged.*

Clark, J;, did not sit: the others concurred.
#### " In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Evelyn C. Howard, Deceased. Francis Cutolo, as Executor Named in the Will, et al., Appellants; Amy F. D. Sturges, Respondent.—

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.