alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
      statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of Richman
      American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.




/s/
                Neal LudekeNeal
                LudekeChief
                Financial Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
                Corp., Manager of the RegistrantMarch
                  12, 2008
### §549. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §104(c), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2238

Section, act Mar. 3, 1899, ch. 425, §7, 30 Stat. 1150, provided that Chief of Engineers, in submitting his annual reports to Congress on river and harbor improvements, report on deterioration in improvements, estimate cost of repairing or rebuilding such works, and recommend discontinuance of appropriations for any works deemed unworthy of further improvement.
### §608. Construction of fishways

Whenever river and harbor improvements shall be found to operate (whether by lock and dam or otherwise), as obstructions to the passage of fish, the Secretary of the Army may, in his discretion, direct and cause to be constructed practical and sufficient fishways, to be paid for out of the general appropriations for the streams on which such fishways may be constructed.

(Aug. 11, 1888, ch. 860, §11, 25 Stat. 425; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act Aug. 11, 1888, the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1888.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean
Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


May 11,
2009
```

[107th Congress Public Law 33]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ033.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 215]]

Public Law 107-33
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street in 
      New York, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Aug. 20, 2001 -  [H.R. 988]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 40 Centre Street in New 
York, New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Thurgood Marshall 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.

    Approved August 20, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 988:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-166 (Comm. on Transportation and Infastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Aug. 2, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.
```
### §535g. Federal navigable waters and commerce jurisdiction unaffected

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to affect, impair, or diminish any right, power, or jurisdiction of the United States over or in regard to any navigable water or any interstate or foreign commerce.

(Pub. L. 92–434, §10, Sept. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 733.)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-020 March 31, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH OFFICIALS FROM EXELON NUCLEAR

TO DISCUSS SAFETY PERFORMANCE AT BYRON

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with officials from the Exelon

Generation Company on Friday, April 4, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of the

Byron nuclear power plant, located in Byron, Illinois.

The meeting will be held at 7 p.m. at the Jarrett Prairie Center, located at the Byron Area

Prairie Preserve in Byron. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the conclusion of the meeting for questions and comments from the public.

A letter from the NRC to the Exelon Generation Company addresses plant safety performance

during the previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that,

overall, Byron operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance

was at a level requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter is

available from Region III Public Affairs Office and on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/listofasmrpt.html

In addition, the letter notes: "As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001,

the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve guard

force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of these requirements and

have monitored your actions in response to changing threat advisories. For calendar Year 2003, we plan

to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline inspection program, as well as

perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new requirements that may be ordered."

Current performance information for Byron is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html#section2

###
### §9104. Congressional action on budgets of wholly owned Government corporations

(a) Congress shall—

(1) consider budget programs for wholly owned Government corporations the President submits;

(2) make necessary appropriations authorized by law;

(3) make corporate financial resources available for operating and administrative expenses; and

(4) provide for repaying capital and the payment of dividends.

(b) This section does not—

(1) prevent a wholly owned Government corporation from carrying out or financing its activities as authorized under another law;

(2) affect section 26 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831y); or

(3) affect the authority of a wholly owned Government corporation to make a commitment without fiscal year limitation.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1043.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9104(a) | 31:849(1st sentence). | Dec. 6, 1945, ch. 557, §104, 59 Stat. 598; restated July 30, 1947, ch. 358, §307, 61 Stat. 584. |
| 9104(b) | 31:849(2d, last sentences). | |

In subsection (a), the words "budget programs for wholly owned Government corporations" are substituted for "Budget programs" for clarity and consistency. The words "legislation . . . be enacted", "as may be", "for expenditure", "corporate funds or other", "or limiting the use thereof", "as the Congress may determine", and "funds" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the word "existing" is omitted as surplus. In clause (1), the word "another" is added for clarity. In clause (3), the words "contracts or other" and "reference to" are omitted as surplus.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6636

WARREN L. HOLDERMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MARK HUGHES,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-93-592-6)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren L. Holderman, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Norwood League,

Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH

CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief in part on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994),

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that

a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Holderman v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-93-592-6

(M.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 7201.101 General.

In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to all employees of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), including members of the Commission and the General Counsel, and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Too Late Financial Corporation (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, AnthonyN. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or			15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all			material respects, the financial condition and results of operations			of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Anthony N. DeMint |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | January 29, 2007 |
|--------|------------------|
§ 531.405 Waiting periods for within-grade increase. ( a ) *Length of waiting period.* ( 1 ) For an employee with a scheduled tour of duty, the waiting periods for advancement to the next higher step in all General Schedule grades (or the next higher rate within the grade, as defined in § 531.403) are: ( i ) Rate of basic pay less than the rate of basic pay at step 4-52 calendar weeks of creditable service;
( ii ) Rate of basic pay equal to or greater than the rate of basic pay at step 4 and less than the rate of basic pay at step 7-104 calendar weeks of creditable service; and
( iii ) Rate of basic pay equal to or greater than the rate of basic pay at step 7-156 calendar weeks of creditable service.
( 2 ) For an employee without a scheduled tour of duty, the waiting periods for advancement to the next higher step of all General Schedule grades (or the next higher rate within the grade, as defined in § 531.403) are: ( i ) Rate of basic pay less than the rate of basic pay at step 4-260 days of creditable service in a pay status over a period of not less than 52 calendar weeks;
( ii ) Rate of basic pay equal to or greater than the rate of basic pay at step 4 and less than the rate of basic pay at step 7-520 days of creditable service in a pay status over a period of not less than 104 calendar weeks; and
( iii ) Rate of basic pay equal to or greater than the rate of basic pay at step 7-780 days of creditable service in a pay status over a period of not less than 156 calendar weeks.
( b ) *Commencement of a waiting period.* A waiting period begins; ( 1 ) On the first appointment as an employee of the Federal Government, regardless of tenure;
( 2 ) On receiving an equivalent increase; or
( 3 ) After a period of nonpay status or a break in service (alone or in combination) in excess of 52 calendar weeks, unless the nonpay status or break in service is creditable service under § 531.406 of this subpart.
( c ) A waiting period is not interrupted by non-workdays intervening between an employee's last scheduled workday in one position and his or her first scheduled workday in a new position.
[46 FR 2319, Jan. 9, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 65536, Dec. 15, 1993; 59 FR 40794, Aug. 10, 1994]
§ 213.3 Determination of small business eligibility. ( a ) *Application for technical assistance from small businesses.* An applicant for technical assistance under 19 U.S.C. 1339(b) must certify that it qualifies as a small business under the appropriate size standard(s) and that it is an independently owned and operated company. An application for technical assistance is available from the Office and on the Commission's Web site. The application must be signed under oath by an officer or principal of the applicant. The completed application should be submitted to the Office at the address set forth in § 213.2(a).
( b ) *Application for technical assistance from joint applicants, trade associations and unions.* If several businesses jointly or simultaneously from the same industry apply for technical assistance, each business must meet the appropriate SBA size standard(s) and so certify. If a trade association applies for technical assistance, an officer of the trade association must certify that eighty (80) percent of the trade association's members are companies that meet the appropriate size standard(s) and provide a listing of members of the association. If a union applies for technical assistance, an officer of the union must certify that the union has less than ten thousand (10,000) members within the industry for which trade relief is being sought. Applications for trade associations or for unions to request technical assistance are available from the Office. Applications must be signed under oath by an officer of the association or union and completed applications should be submitted to the Office as set forth in § 213.2(a).
( c ) *Determination of eligibility and notification of determination.* The Office shall determine whether the applicant is eligible for technical assistance and notify the applicant of the determination within ten (10) days of receipt of a properly completed application. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1339(c)(1), the Office's determination of eligibility is not reviewable by any other agency or by any court.
( d ) *Notification to administering agencies.* When an applicant seeks technical assistance on matters involving the trade laws, and the Office determines that the applicant is eligible for technical assistance, the Office shall: ( 1 ) Promptly notify the appropriate administering agency or agencies of the Office's determination that the applicant is eligible to receive technical assistance; and
( 2 ) Consult with the administering agency or agencies as to the provision of technical assistance to that applicant.
[54 FR 33883, Aug. 17, 1989, as amended at 80 FR 39380, July 9, 2015
# L_2015230EN.01004801.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/48

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 240/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1464]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2011/753/EU of 18 November 2011 establishing rules and calculation methods for verifying compliance with the targets set in Article 11(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2011/753/EU of 18 November 2011 establishing rules and calculation methods for verifying compliance with the targets set in Article 11(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 32ffc (Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2013) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘32ffd. | 32011 D 0753: Commission Decision 2011/753/EU of 18 November 2011 establishing rules and calculation methods for verifying compliance with the targets set in Article 11(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 310, 25.11.2011, p. 11).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘32ffd.

32011 D 0753: Commission Decision 2011/753/EU of 18 November 2011 establishing rules and calculation methods for verifying compliance with the targets set in Article 11(2) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 310, 25.11.2011, p. 11).’

Article 2

The text of Decision 2011/753/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 310, 25.11.2011, p. 11.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 1651.3 Designation of beneficiary. ( a ) *Designation requirements.* A participant may designate one or more beneficiaries for his or her TSP account. A valid TSP designation of beneficiary remains in effect until it is properly changed as described in § 1651.4.
( b ) *Eligible beneficiaries.* Any individual, firm, corporation, or legal entity, including the U.S. Government, may be designated as a beneficiary. A participant can name up to 20 total (primary and contingent) beneficiaries to share the death benefit. A beneficiary may be designated without the knowledge or consent of that beneficiary or the knowledge or consent of the participant's spouse.
( c ) *Validity requirements.* To be valid and accepted by the TSP record keeper, a TSP designation of beneficiary must: ( 1 ) Be received by the TSP record keeper on or before the date of the participant's death;
( 2 ) Identify the participant in such a manner so that the TSP record keeper can locate his or her TSP account;
( 3 ) Be signed and properly dated by the participant and signed and properly dated by one witness: ( i ) The participant must either sign the designation of beneficiary in the presence of the witness or acknowledge his or her signature on the designation of beneficiary to the witness;
( ii ) A witness must be age 21 or older; and
( iii ) A witness designated as a beneficiary will not be entitled to receive a death benefit payment; if a witness is the only named beneficiary, the designation of the beneficiary is invalid. If more than one beneficiary is named, the share of the witness beneficiary will be allocated among the remaining beneficiaries pro rata;
( 4 ) Designate primary beneficiary shares which when summed equal 100%;
( 5 ) Contain no substantive alterations (e.g., struck-through shares or scratched-out names of beneficiaries);
( 6 ) Designate each primary and each contingent beneficiary in such a manner so that the TSP record keeper can identify the individual or entity;
( 7 ) Not attempt to designate beneficiaries for the participant's traditional balance and the participant's Roth balance separately; and
( 8 ) Be received by the TSP record keeper not more than 365 calendar days after the date of the participant's most recent signature.
( d ) *Will.* A participant cannot use a will to designate a TSP beneficiary.
[87 FR 31685, May 24, 2022]
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs

Washington, DC 20555

Phone 301-415-8200 Fax 301-415-2234

Internet:opa@nrc.gov

No. 98-111 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Thursday, July 2, 1998)

NOTE TO EDITORS: ERROR IN ANNOUNCEMENT 98-108

An NRC press release, No. 98-108, entitled “NRC Increases

Insurance Assessment for Nuclear Power Plants Based on

Inflation,” dated July 1, was issued in error.

The Commission has not yet acted to increase the maximum

amount nuclear utilities would be assessed per licensed reactor

in case of a severe accident with public liability claims

exceeding $200 million.

Once the Commission acts on the increase--mandated by law to

reflect changes in the Department of Labor Consumer Price Index--

a new announcement will be issued. The original announcement has

been removed from the NRC’s Internet web page.

###