alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2427.5 Standards governing issuance of general statements of policy or guidance. In deciding whether to issue a general statement of policy or guidance, the Authority shall consider: ( a ) Whether the question presented can more appropriately be resolved by other means;
( b ) Where other means are available, whether an Authority statement would prevent the proliferation of cases involving the same or similar question;
( c ) Whether the resolution of the question presented would have general applicability under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute;
( d ) Whether the question currently confronts parties in the context of a labor-management relationship;
( e ) Whether the question is presented jointly by the parties involved; and
( f ) Whether the issuance by the Authority of a general statement of policy or guidance on the question would promote constructive and cooperative labor-management relationships in the Federal service and would otherwise promote the purposes of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
#### § 185.142 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the authority head imposing penalties and/or assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0162 - Litigation Report - 2004 - 04

Accession Number: ML042470386

Date Released: Tuesday, September 21, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML042470375 - SECY-04-0162 - Litigation Report - 2004 - 04 (3 page(s), 9/7/2004)
    - ML042230329 - SECY-04-0162-Attachment 3-Motion to Vacate for Oral Argument, dated 7/22/04 (2 page(s), 7/22/2004)
    - ML042470405 - SECY-04-0162- Attachment 2 - Order Granting Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of the Case, dated 05/05/04 (1 page(s), 5/5/2004)
    - ML042510046 - SECY-04-0162-Attachment 4 - Petition for Review, No. 04-1293,  dated 8/31/04 (2 page(s), 8/31/2004)
    - ML042510070 - SECY-04-0162-Attachment 5-Petition for Review, No. 04-3577-AG, dated 6/25/04 (3 page(s), 6/25/2004)
    - ML042510080 - SECY-04-0162-Attachment 6-Petition for Review, No. 04-71432, dated 3/26/04 (4 page(s), 3/26/2004)
    - ML042510094 - SECY-04-0162-Attachment 7-Citizens Awareness Network's Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against The United State Nuclear Regulatory Commission for Release of a Document Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552 (4 page(s), 9/7/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### Part A—Police Corps
Order filed December 15, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00870-CV

____________

AGNES BROWNLOW, Appellant

V.

PATRICIA MARTINEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1000585

O R D E R

Appellant's brief was due November 21, 2011. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant submits her brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the 

brief was late, to the Clerk of this Court on or before January 17, 2012, the Court will 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-034 June 16, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC, N.J. COMPANY TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS INVOLVING GAUGE

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of a Mays Landing, N.J.-based

company on Thursday, June 23, to discuss three apparent violations of agency regulations involving the control,

security and transportation of a nuclear gauge.

 Known as a predecisional enforcement conference, the meeting is scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. at

the NRC Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road in King of Prussia, Pa. It will be open to the public for

observation and NRC staff will be available to answer questions before the session is adjourned.

 The apparent violations were identified as the result of an NRC special inspection conducted in

response to an April 25th incident. On that date, a nuclear gauge owned by Craig Testing Laboratories, Inc., fell

out of a truck driven by one of its employees and could not be located. The loss of the gauge, which contains

americium-241 and cesium-137 and is used for such purposes as measuring soil density, occurred in

Pocopson (Chester County), Pa. The employee had been performing work at a temporary job site in that town. 

Although the transport case holding the gauge had been chained to the truck, the chain had several feet of slack,

the case was not locked and the vehicle’s tailgate was not closed to a locked position.

 It was not until four days later that the gauge was recovered. A local citizen who found the device

read about the search for the gauge in an area newspaper, contacted the company and arranged for its return. 

Craig Testing reported to the NRC that the gauge was recovered in good condition, with no visible damage. 

Subsequent testing indicated there was no leakage and therefore no workers or members of the public were

exposed to any radiation due to the event.

 An NRC special inspection was conducted on April 27 at the company’s main office in Mays

Landing and at the temporary job site in Pocopson. Based on the results of the inspection, three apparent

violations were identified: a failure to control or maintain constant surveillance of licensed nuclear material that

is in an unrestricted area and is not in storage; a failure to ensure that a portable nuclear density gauge or its

outer container is locked; and a failure to comply with the applicable requirements of U.S. Department of

Transportation regulations when transporting a nuclear gauge.

 The purpose of the June 23rd meeting is to obtain information to enable the NRC to determine what,

if any, enforcement action is warranted. For instance, there will be an effort to come to a common

understanding of the facts and a discussion of root causes of the event and corrective actions undertaken by the

company.
-2-

 No decision will be made by the NRC staff at the session. Rather, NRC management will render a

decision sometime in the near future.

 ###
Presidential Documents

65279 

Federal Register 

Vol. 83, No. 244 

Thursday, December 20, 2018 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of November 29, 2018 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, and subject to fulfilling the requirements of section 

614(a)(3) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate 

to you the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether 

it is important to the security interests of the United States to use up 

to $1.3 million in International Military Education and Training (IMET) 

funds to furnish assistance to Thailand without regard to any other provision 

of law within the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, November 29, 2018 

[FR Doc. 2018–27694 

Filed 12–19–18; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with PRESIDENTIAL DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>
§ 316.701 Public or private enterprise taken over by Government. ( a ) When the Office, or an agency acting under an agreement with the Office, finds that the Federal Government has taken over a public or private enterprise, or an identifiable unit thereof, and that a position has thereby been brought into the competitive service, the agency may retain the incumbent of the position.
( b ) ( 1 ) When an agency retains an employee under paragraph (a) of this section in a position which it determines to be a continuing one, the agency gives the employee a status quo appointment and shall decide on a timely basis whether it will convert that individual's employment to career or career-conditional under § 315.701 of this chapter.
( 2 ) When an agency decides not to effect conversion under § 315.701 of this chapter, or the employee fails to qualify for conversion, the agency, in its discretion, may retain the employee as a status quo employee.
( c ) An agency may retain an employee under paragraph (a) of this section in a position that it determines is noncontinuing under a temporary appointment. That appointment may be made for a period not to exceed 1 year and will be subject to the time limits set out in § 316.402.
[44 FR 55133, Sept. 25, 1979, as amended at 60 FR 39101, Aug. 1, 1995; 63 FR 63784, Nov. 17, 1998]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Stan
      Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Stan CipkowskiStan
                CipkowskiChief
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Executive OfficerAugust
                14, 2008
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation 

Santa Monica, California 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-115392 and No. 333-143173 and No. 333-150210) and Form S-8 (No. 333-70478, No. 333-96563, No. 333-104227 and No. 333-129528) of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation of our reports dated March12, 2009, relating to the financial statements, the financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation for the year ended December 31,2008. 

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP 

Irvine, California

March 12, 2009
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00384

- CR

Raymond ZAPATA

, Appellant

v.

The State

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR6345

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED July 29, 2015.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
§ 2.2 Appointments. ( a ) OPM shall establish and administer a career-conditional appointment system for positions subject to competitive examinations which will permit adjustment of the career service to necessary fluctuations in Federal employment, and provide an equitable and orderly system for stabilizing the Federal work force. A competitive status shall be acquired by a career-conditional appointee upon satisfactory completion of a probationary period, but the appointee shall have career-conditional tenure for a period of service to be prescribed by regulation of OPM. When an employee has completed the required period of service his appointment shall be converted to a career appointment without time limitation: *Provided,* That his career-conditional appointment shall not be converted to a career appointment if the limitation on the number of permanent employees in the Federal civil service established under paragraph (b) of this section would be exceeded thereby. Persons selected from competitive civil service registers for other than temporary appointment shall be given career-conditional appointments: *Provided,* That career appointments shall be given to the following classes of eligibles: ( 1 ) Persons whose appointments are required by statute to be made on a permanent basis;
( 2 ) Employees serving under career appointments at the time of selection from such registers;
( 3 ) Former employees who have eligibility for career appointments upon reinstatement; and
( 4 ) To the extent permitted by law, persons appointed to positions in the field service of the U.S. Postal Service for which salary rates are fixed by the act of July 6, 1945, 59 Stat. 435, as heretofore or hereafter amended and supplemented.
( b ) Under the career-conditional appointment system there shall be a limit on the number of permanent employees in the Federal civil service which shall be the ceiling established by section 1310 of the Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1952 (65 Stat. 757), as amended. In the event section 1310, supra, is repealed, OPM is authorized to fix such limitation on the number of permanent employees in the Federal civil service as it finds necessary to meet the needs of the service.
( c ) OPM may determine the types, duration, and conditions of indefinite and temporary appointments, and may prescribe the method for replacing persons holding such appointments.
9059 NW 152nd LN

Miami, FL 33018

October 15, 2015

US Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Add Aircraft to Shot From Above LLC, 

Exemption. (Exemption # 12225 in Docket No. FAA-2015-1656) 

Dear Sir or Madam:

Shot From Above LLC (Exemption # 12225 in Docket No. FAA-2015-1656) 

was granted an exemption to conduct aerial data collection and closed set TV/

Movie filming using a DJI S1000+. 

 There is no request for additional relief from any further regulations. Shot 

From Above LLC, requests for an amendment to that exemption to add onto it’s 

fleet the DJI Inspire 1 and the Freefly Systems Alta. Granting this exemption 

would not affect safety but will benefit the public because instead of dangerous 

helicopters being used, safer and quieter unmanned aircraft can be used under 

the restrictions outlined in the previously granted exemption. Shot From Above 

LLC, agrees to operate under the same restrictions in the exemption. 

The Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (“FOPM”) for each aircraft can be 

found using the links below: 

DJI Inspire 1 User Manual 

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/

Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf

Shot from Above LLC Page 1 of 2
Freefly Systems Alta User Manual & Setup Guide 

http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/28175748/

ALTA_Manual_RevB.pdf

http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/24212006/FFASG.pdf

Shot From Above LLC, will operate only within the limitations in the previously 

granted exemption and the limitations listed within each aircraft’s FOPM. 

 Since the Freefly Systems Alta and the DJI Inspire 1 platform has been 

previously granted in other exemptions (Exemption No. 12362, etc.) and would 

not set any precedent, there is good cause to waive the publishing of this petition 

in the Federal Register. 

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact the 

undersigned at 786-970-8352 or at yovani@shotfromabove.net.

Sincerely yours,

Yovani Linares

President

Shot From Above, LLC

Shot from Above LLC Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, James R. Lattanzi, Chief Financial Officer of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Date:  March 11, 2004                        /s/ James R. Lattanzi
                                             --------------------------
                                             James R. Lattanzi
                                             Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          65,030
<SECURITIES>                                    14,571
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                       731
<INVENTORY>                                     57,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,376
<PP&E>                                          76,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,241
<BONDS>                                        172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,991
<SALES>                                         44,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,448
<CGS>                                           28,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                       640
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
# L_2015149EN.01002201.xml

| 16.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 149/22

---

DECISION No 1/2015 OF THE EU-EFTA JOINT COMMITTEE ON COMMON TRANSIT

of 11 May 2015

concerning an invitation to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to accede to the Convention on a common transit procedure [2015/921]

THE EU-EFTA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure (1) (‘the Convention’), and in particular Article 15(3)(e) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The promotion of trade with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia would be facilitated by a common transit procedure for goods transported between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the European Union, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of Turkey. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The promotion of trade with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia would be facilitated by a common transit procedure for goods transported between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the European Union, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Republic of Turkey.

| (2) | With a view to achieving such a procedure, it is appropriate to invite the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to accede to the Convention, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

With a view to achieving such a procedure, it is appropriate to invite the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to accede to the Convention,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In accordance with Article 15a of the Convention on a common transit procedure, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia shall be invited to accede to the Convention as from 1 July 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Ankara, 11 May 2015.

For the EU-EFTA Joint Committee

The President

Sezai UÇARMAK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 226, 13.8.1987, p. 2.

1

---
2011 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d

S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s

for the Thir d C ir c uit

9-29-2011



# U S A v . W al k e r

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 10-3623

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2011 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . W al k e r " (2011). 2011 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 453.

h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011/453

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

__________

No. 10

- 3623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

AHMED WALKER, a/k/a Amelios, a/k/a Ammo

,

Ahmed Walker,

Appellant.

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D. C. No. 1

- 00

- cr

- 00300

- 003)

District Judge: Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo

Submitted under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

on July 15, 2011

Opinion f iled September 9, 2011

Before: RENDELL

, SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the opinion filed on September 9, 2011

, is hereby

vacated and an amended opinion shall be filed simultaneously with this order. The

revised opinion does not alter the September 9, 2011 judgment or the panel’s

### decision to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing.

.

By the Court,

/s/ Jane R. Roth

Circuit Judge

Dated: 29 September 2011