alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                   ------------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the  accompanying  Report on Form  10-KSB of  Technol  Fuel
Conditioners,  Inc.  for the year  ended  December  31,  2002,  I,  Mel  Hooper,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such  Report on Form  10-KSB  for the year ended  December  31,  2002,  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained  in such Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002,  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Technol Fuel Conditioners, Inc.

Dated: September 30, 2003
/s/ Mel Hooper
---------------------------
By:  Mel Hooper, President



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing  certifications  are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 302.102 Method of filling positions and status of incumbent. ( a ) To the extent permitted by statute and this chapter, each appointment, position change, and removal in the excepted service shall be made in accordance with any regulations or practices that the head of the agency concerned finds necessary.
( b ) Except as authorized under paragraph (c) of this section, a person appointed to an excepted position does not acquire a competitive status by reason of the appointment. When an employee serving under a nontemporary appointment in the competitive service is selected for an excepted appointment, the agency must— ( 1 ) Inform the employee that, because the position is in the excepted service, it may not be filled by a competitive appointment, and that acceptance of the proposed appointment will take him/her out of the competitive service while he/she occupies the position; and
( 2 ) Obtain from the employee a written statement that he/she understands he/she is leaving the competitive service voluntarily to accept an appointment in the excepted service.
( c ) Upon a finding by OPM that in a particular situation the action will be in the interest of good administration, OPM may authorize an agency to make appointments to specified positions in the excepted service in the same manner as to positions in the competitive service. Persons given career-conditional or career appointments pursuant to a specific authorization by OPM under this paragraph may acquire a competitive status as provided in part 315 of this chapter.
[55 FR 9407, Mar. 14, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 58261, Nov. 1, 1993]
§ 330.103 Requirement to notify OPM. An agency must provide the vacancy announcement information to OPM promptly when: ( a ) Filling a vacancy for more than 120 days from outside the agency's current permanent competitive service workforce, as required by the Interagency Career Transition Assistance Plan, subpart G of this part, unless the action to be taken is listed in subpart G as an exception to that subpart;
( b ) Filling any vacancy under the agency's merit promotion procedures when the agency will accept applications from outside its permanent competitive service workforce; and
( c ) Filling a vacancy by open competitive examination, including direct hire procedures under part 337 of this chapter, or in the Senior Executive Service, as required by 5 U.S.C. 3327.
§ 550.1505 Order of precedence. If the authorized agency official determines the agency will furnish a flag, it must be issued to one beneficiary pursuant to the following order of precedence— ( a ) The widow or widower;
( b ) If none, to a child (including step, foster, or adopted child), according to age (*i.e.*, oldest to youngest);
( c ) If none, to a parent (including step, foster, or adoptive parent);
( d ) If none, to a sibling (including step, half, or adopted sibling), according to age; (*i.e.*, oldest to youngest);
If none, to any individual related by blood or close family affiliation.
### §59kk. Wateree River

For purposes of bridge administration, the portion of the Wateree River in the State of South Carolina, from a point 100 feet upstream of the railroad bridge located at approximately mile marker 10.0 to a point 100 feet downstream of such bridge, is declared to not be navigable waters of the United States for purposes of the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 108–293, title VI, §610, Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1058.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Bridge Act of 1946, referred to in text, is title V of act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, 60 Stat. 847, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§525 et seq.) of chapter 11 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 525 of this title and Tables.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-137 October 11, 2005

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION TO

RENEW OPERATING LICENSE FOR KANSAS STATE RESEARCH REACTOR

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on an

application to renew the operating license for the Kansas State University (KSU) Research Reactor for

an additional 20 years.

The KSU Research Reactor is a TRIGA Mark II reactor located on the Kansas State campus in

Manhattan, Kansas. The university submitted the renewal application Sept. 12, 2002, and

supplemented the application on Dec. 22, 2004, and July 6, 2005. The reactor’s license would have

expired Oct. 16, 2002, but since the renewal application was filed before that point, the NRC will

consider the license valid until the renewal application has been reviewed.

The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the

agency to formally "docket," or file, the application and begin its technical review. Docketing the

application does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds; nor does it

indicate whether the Commission will grant the application.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing was published in the Federal Register on Oct. 6,

and the deadline for requesting a hearing is Nov. 7. Petitions may be filed by anyone whose interest

may be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding.

A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of

the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Requests may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101

or e-mail to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov. A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of

General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov.

Information about the NRC’s oversight of research reactors can be found on the agency’s Web

site at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/non-power.html .

###
### SUBCHAPTER XXXI—OFFENDER REENTRY AND COMMUNITY SAFETY
§ 536.203 Additional eligibility requirements for grade retention. ( a ) An employee is eligible for grade retention under § 536.201(a)(1) only if the employee has served for at least 52 consecutive weeks in one or more positions under a covered pay system at one or more grades higher than the grade of the position in which the employee is being placed. Such service is deemed to include service performed by an employee of a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c)) who is moved to a position in the civil service employment system of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard, respectively, without a break in service of more than 3 days.
( b ) An employee is eligible for grade retention under § 536.201(a)(2) based on a reclassification of his or her position only if, immediately before the reduction in grade, that position was classified at the existing grade or a higher grade for a continuous period of at least 1 year.
( c ) An employee is eligible for grade retention under § 536.202 only if, immediately before being placed in the lower grade, the employee has served for at least 52 consecutive weeks in one or more positions under a covered pay system at one or more grades higher than that lower grade. Such service is deemed to include service performed by an employee of a nonappropriated fund instrumentality of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105(c)) who is moved to a position in the civil service employment system of the Department of Defense or the Coast Guard, respectively, without a break in service of more than 3 days.
( d ) Eligibility for grade retention under § 536.201 or § 536.202 ceases under the conditions specified in § 536.207.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-05-0138 - RISK-INFORMED AND PERFORMANCE-BASED ALTERNATIVES TO THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION

Accession Number: ML051950610

Date Released: Thursday, August 25, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML051950619 - SECY-05-0138 - RISK-INFORMED AND PERFORMANCE-BASED ALTERNATIVES TO THE SINGLE-FAILURE CRITERION (11 page(s), 8/4/2005)
    - ML051950625 - SECY-05-0138 - Attachment 2 - Technical Work to Support Evaluation of a Broader Change to the Single-Failure Criterion (70 page(s), 7/1/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
EXHIBIT 99.3
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Paul F. Walsh, certify that:
         1.     I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of eFundsCorporation:
         2.     Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisamended annual report;
         3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this amended annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annualreport;   Date: November 29, 2002 /s/ Paul F. WalshBy: Paul F. WalshIts: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0152 - Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 72 License and Certificate of Compliance Terms

Accession Number: ML053330513

Date Released: Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML061440506 - SECY-06-0152 - Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations Part 72 License and Certificate of Compliance Terms (9 page(s), 7/7/2006)
    - ML061510436 - SECY-06-0152Enclosure 1 - Status of 10 CFR Part 72 ISFSI Site-Specific Licenses (1 page(s), 7/7/2006)
    - ML061510444 - SECY-06-0152Enclosure 2 -  Status of 10 CFR Part 72 ISFSI General Licenses (1 page(s), 7/7/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §2341. Expedited actions for emergency flood damage reduction

The Secretary shall expedite any authorized planning, design, and construction of any project for flood damage reduction for an area that, within the preceding 5 years, has been subject to flooding that resulted in the loss of life and caused damage of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a declaration of a major disaster by the President under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2009, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1074.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143, which is classified principally to chapter 68 (§5121 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
G. BRAD BECKSTEAD
Certified Public Accountant
                                         330 E. Warm Springs
                                         Las Vegas, NV 89119
                                                702.257.1984
                                            702.362.0540 fax





March 27, 2002


To Whom It May Concern:

The  firm  of  G.  Brad  Beckstead,  CPA,  consents  to  the
inclusion  of my report of March 27, 2002, on the  Financial
Statements of Too Late Financial Corporation for the years ended
December 31,  2001  and 2000, in its Form 10K-SB filing to  be  filed
with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,




G. Brad Beckstead, CPA
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Gateway”), does hereby certify that:

 

a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Gateway. 

 

Dated: May 10, 2005
### §521. Employees

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall appoint and fix the pay of employees of the Office under regulations prescribed by the President.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 886.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 521 | 31:17(a)(related to employees). | June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §208(a)(related to employees), 42 Stat. 22; Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1939, eff. July 1, 1939, §1, 53 Stat. 1423; Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970, eff. July 1, 1970, §102(a), 84 Stat. 2085. |

The words "attorneys and other" are omitted as being included in "employees".
#### § 210.41 Termination of investigation.

Except as provided in § 210.21 (b)(2), (c), and (d), an order of termination issued by the Commission shall constitute a determination of the Commission under § 210.45(c). The Commission shall publish in the Federal Register notice of each Commission order that terminates an investigation in its entirety.

[60 FR 53120, Oct. 12, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Delightfully Frozen Corp. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ken Graham, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Delightfully Frozen Corp., and will be retained by Delightfully
Frozen Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Ken Graham
--------------------------
Ken Graham
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 11, 2004
#### § 293.507 Maintenance and content of the Employee Medical Folder.

The agency head must maintain all appropriate employee occupational medical records in the EMFS. When an EMF is established for an employee, as required in § 293.504, the agency's EMFS must be searched to obtain all records designated for retention in the EMF.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Chris Biedermann, Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Central European
Distribution Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual
report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
annual report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 15, 2005



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Chris Biedermann                                 
|    |  | Chris Biedermann                                     
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
#### § 532.509 Pay for Sunday work.

A wage employee whose regular work schedule includes a period of service of up to 8 hours which is not overtime work, a part of which is on Sunday, is entitled to additional pay under the provisions of section 5544 of title 5, United States Code.

[76 FR 52539, Aug. 23, 2011]
§ 362.409 Conversion to the competitive service. ( a ) A Fellow must complete the Program within the time limits prescribed in § 362.404 of this part, including any agency-approved extension. At the conclusion of that period, the Fellow may be converted, as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) An agency may convert, without a break in service, an ERB-certified PMF to a competitive service term or permanent appointment in any position for which they are qualified.
( c ) A PMF who is being converted to a permanent or term position at a different agency is subject to the following conditions: ( 1 ) The employing (or losing) agency must be unable to convert the PMF to a term or permanent position in the competitive service in the current organizational unit of the employing agency or another component within the same Department or agency. These reasons for conversion at another agency may include unforeseen budgetary constraints; reorganizations; abolishment of positions; or other appropriate reasons. Such a conversion to another agency may not be due to issues related to failure to obtain certification from the agency's Executive Resources Board, misconduct, poor performance, or suitability;
( 2 ) Conversion must occur on or before the end of the agency prescribed Program period, plus any agency-approved extension; and
( 3 ) The position at the new agency must have a full performance level that is equivalent to or less than the position to which the PMF would have been converted at the losing agency.
[77 FR 28215, May 11, 2012, as amended at 89 FR 25775, Apr. 12, 2024]