alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 300.604 Restrictions. The following time-in-grade restrictions must be met unless advancement is permitted by § 300.603(b) of this part: ( a ) *Advancement to positions at GS-12 and above.* Candidates for advancement to a position at GS-12 and above must have completed a minimum of 52 weeks in positions no more than one grade lower (or equivalent) than the position to be filled.
( b ) *Advancement to positions at GS-6 through GS-11.* Candidates for advancement to a position at GS-6 through GS-11 must have completed a minimum of 52 weeks in positions: ( 1 ) No more than two grades lower (or equivalent) when the position to be filled is in a line of work properly classified at 2-grade intervals; or
( 2 ) No more than one grade lower (or equivalent) when the position to be filled is in a line of work properly classified at 1-grade intervals; or
( 3 ) No more than one or two grades lower (or equivalent), as determined by the agency, when the position to be filled is in a line of work properly classified at 1-grade intervals but has a mixed interval promotion pattern.
( c ) *Advancement to positions up to GS-5.* Candidates may be advanced without time restriction to positions up to GS-5 if the position to be filled is no more than two grades above the lowest grade the employee held within the preceding 52 weeks under his or her latest nontemporary competitive appointment.
From: <Rick.Boddicker@state.sd.us> 

To: Gail Fallon/R8/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: <Brian.Gustafson@state.sd.us> 

Date: 03/26/2012 06:49 AM 

Subject: Big Stone Information for EPA 

 

Gail, 

 

The two attached PDF files discuss when the Over Fire Air System was installed at Big Stone and 

the reasons why Big Stone was installing those systems. Let us know if you have any other 

questions. 

 

Rick 

Big Stone Overfire AirA.pdf 

 Big Stone Overfire AirB.pdf
### §1517. Prohibited obligations and expenditures

(a) An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not make or authorize an expenditure or obligation exceeding—

(1) an apportionment; or

(2) the amount permitted by regulations prescribed under section 1514(a) of this title.

(b) If an officer or employee of an executive agency or of the District of Columbia government violates subsection (a) of this section, the head of the executive agency or the Mayor of the District of Columbia, as the case may be, shall report immediately to the President and Congress all relevant facts and a statement of actions taken. A copy of each report shall also be transmitted to the Comptroller General on the same date the report is transmitted to the President and Congress.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 932; Pub. L. 108–447, div. G, title I, §1401(b), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3192.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1517(a) | 31:665(h). | R.S. §3679(h), (i)(2)(related to (h)); Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §4(1st par.), 33 Stat. 1257; Feb. 27, 1906, ch. 510, §3, 34 Stat. 48; restated Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1211, 64 Stat. 768. |
| 1517(b) | 31:665(i)(2)(related to (h)). | |

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 9 of the Act of June 26, 1912 (ch. 182, 37 Stat. 184). In clause (1), the word "apportionment" is substituted for "apportionment or reapportionment" because of section 1512(a)(last sentence) of the revised title.

In subsection (b), the word "Mayor" is used because of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1967 (eff. Aug. 11, 1967, 81 Stat. 948) and sections 421, 422, and 771 of the District of Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act (Pub. L. 93–198, 87 Stat. 789, 818). The word "President" is substituted for "President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget" because sections 101 and 102(a) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (eff. July 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 2085) designated the Bureau of the Budget as the Office of Management and Budget and transferred all functions of the Bureau to the President.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 108–447 inserted at end "A copy of each report shall also be transmitted to the Comptroller General on the same date the report is transmitted to the President and Congress."
#### § 2421.6 Regional Director.

*Regional Director* means the Director of a region of the Authority with geographical boundaries as fixed by the Authority.
# L_2015230EN.01003101.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/31

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 228/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1452]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Directive 2014/37/EU of 27 February 2014 amending Council Directive 91/671/EEC relating to the compulsory use of safety belts and child restraint systems in vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Directive 2014/37/EU of 27 February 2014 amending Council Directive 91/671/EEC relating to the compulsory use of safety belts and child restraint systems in vehicles (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 17a (Council Directive 91/671/EEC) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 L 0037: Commission Implementing Directive 2014/37/EU of 27 February 2014 (OJ L 59, 28.2.2014, p. 32).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 L 0037: Commission Implementing Directive 2014/37/EU of 27 February 2014 (OJ L 59, 28.2.2014, p. 32).’.

Article 2

The text of Implementing Directive 2014/37/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 59, 28.2.2014, p. 32.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 511.607 Nonappealable issues. ( a ) The following issues are not appealable to the Office under this subpart. Such issues may be reviewed under administrative or negotiated grievance procedures if applicable: ( 1 ) The accuracy of the official position description including the inclusion or exclusion of a major duty in the official position description. When the accuracy of the official position description is questioned by the employee, the employee will be directed to review this matter with his or her supervisor. If management and the employee cannot resolve their differences informally, the accuracy of the position description should be reviewed in accordance with administrative or negotiated grievance procedures. If the accuracy of the position description cannot be resolved in this manner, the Office will decide the appeal on the basis of the actual duties and responsibilities assigned by management and performed by the employee;
( 2 ) An assignment or detail out of the scope of normally performed duties as outlined in the official position description;
( 3 ) The accuracy, consistency or use of agency supplemental classification guides; or,
( 4 ) The title of the position unless a specific title is authorized in a published Office classification standard or guide, or the title reflects a qualification requirement or authorized area of specialization.
( b ) The following issues are neither appealable nor reviewable: ( 1 ) The class, grade, or pay system of a position to which the employee is not officially assigned by an official personnel action;
( 2 ) An agency's proposed classification decision;
( 3 ) The class, grade, or pay system of a position to which the employee is detailed or promoted on a time-limited basis, except that employees serving under time-limited promotion for 2 years or more may appeal the classification of their positions to the Office under these procedures.
( 4 ) The classification of the employee's position based on position-to-position comparisons and not standards;
( 5 ) The accuracy of grade level criteria contained in an Office classification guide or standard; or
( 6 ) A classification decision that has been issued by the Office under this subpart when there has been no change in the governing classification standard(s) or the major duties of the position.
[46 FR 9913, Jan. 30, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 59348, Nov. 9, 1993]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

### **Certification of ChiefExecutive Officer**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc.,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the threemonths ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 9, 2005 | /s/ Mark M.  Sieczkarek  |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                         | Mark M. Sieczkarek       |
|                         | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds


IMT Insurance Company (Mutual)

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570; 2004 Revision, published July 1, 2004, at 69 FR 40224.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-1033.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued to the following Company under 
31 U.S.C. 9304 to 9308. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate 
their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 2004 Revision, on 
page 40243 to reflect this addition: Company Name: IMT Insurance 
Company (Mutual). Business Address: P.O. Box 1336, Des Moines, Iowa 
50305-1336. Phone: (515) 327-2755. Underwriting Limitation b/: 
$6,630,000. Surety Licenses c/: IL, IN, IA, MO, NE, SD, WI. 
Incorporated In: Iowa.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR Part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570. A hard copy may be purchased from the 
Government Printing Office (GPO) Subscription Service, Washington, DC, 
Telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use the 
following stock number: 769-004-04926-1.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F07, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: October 29, 2004.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 04-24855 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
§ 731.204 Debarment by OPM. ( a ) When OPM finds a person unsuitable for any reason listed in § 731.202, OPM, in its discretion, may, for a period of not more than 3 years from the date of the unfavorable suitability determination, deny that person examination for, and appointment to, covered positions.
( b ) OPM may impose an additional period of debarment following the expiration of a period of OPM or agency debarment, but only after the person again becomes an applicant, appointee, or employee subject to OPM's suitability jurisdiction, and his or her suitability is determined in accordance with the procedures of this part. An additional debarment period may be based in whole or in part on the same conduct on which the previous suitability action was based, when warranted, or new conduct.
( c ) OPM, in its sole discretion, determines the duration of any period of debarment imposed under this section.
### §12146. Definitions

In this part—

"chief local elected official" means an official designated under regulations issued by the Attorney General. The criteria used by the Attorney General in promulgating such regulations shall ensure administrative efficiency and accountability in the expenditure of funds and execution of funded projects under this part.

"chronic high intensity crime area" means an area meeting criteria adopted by the Attorney General by regulation that, at a minimum, define areas with—

(A) consistently high rates of violent crime as reported in the Federal Bureau of Investigation's "Uniform Crime Reports", and

(B) chronically high rates of poverty as determined by the Bureau of the Census.

"State" means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §30306, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1846.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13776 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### Harriett Kruse et al., Appellants, v. Rochester Transit Corporation, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to the respondent to abide the event. All concur. (Appeal from an order setting aside the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiffs and granting a new trial in a bus line negligence action.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-011 March 18, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. TO DISCUSS 

 PERFORMANCE OF ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy

Operations, Inc. on Tuesday, March 30, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment

of safety performance at Arkansas Nuclear One. The facility, which includes two operating

reactors, is located near Russellville, AR.

The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Holiday Inn, 2407 North Arkansas Avenue,

Russellville. The public is invited to observe the meeting and NRC officials will be available

before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public on the safety

performance of the plant, as well as the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In addition,

NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

A letter from the NRC to Entergy addresses the performance of the plant during this

period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/ano_2003q4.pdf.

Overall, Arkansas Nuclear One operated safely and fully met all cornerstone objectives

(cornerstones are measures of plant performance). However, the NRC staff believes

improvements can be made by Entergy to address deficiencies in their problem identification and

resolution programs. The NRC staff plans to monitor the licensee’s efforts in this area through its

baseline inspection program.

Current performance indicators for Unit 1 are available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO1/ano1_chart.html.

Information for Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/ANO2/ano2_chart.html.

###
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.56 N 76.20 WMeters AGL
### §40917. Implementation plan

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after March 23, 2018, the Attorney General, in coordination with the States and Indian tribal governments, shall establish, for each State or Indian tribal government, a plan to ensure maximum coordination and automation of the reporting or making available of appropriate records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System established under section 40901 of this title and the verification of the accuracy of those records during a 4-year period specified in the plan. The records shall be limited to those of an individual described in subsection (g) or (n) of section 922 of title 18 1

#### (b) Benchmark requirements

Each plan established under this section shall include annual benchmarks to enable the Attorney General to assess the implementation of the plan, including—

(1) qualitative goals and quantitative measures; and

(2) a needs assessment, including estimated compliance costs.

#### (c) Compliance determination

Not later than the end of each fiscal year beginning after the date of the establishment of an implementation plan under this section, the Attorney General shall determine whether each State or Indian tribal government has achieved substantial compliance with the benchmarks included in the plan.

#### (d) Accountability

The Attorney General—

(1) shall disclose and publish, including on the website of the Department of Justice—

(A) the name of each State or Indian tribal government that received a determination of failure to achieve substantial compliance with an implementation plan under subsection (c) for the preceding fiscal year; and

(B) a description of the reasons for which the Attorney General has determined that the State or Indian tribal government is not in substantial compliance with the implementation plan, including, to the greatest extent possible, a description of the types and amounts of records that have not been submitted; and

(2) if a State or Indian tribal government described in paragraph (1) subsequently receives a determination of substantial compliance, shall—

(A) immediately correct the applicable record; and

(B) not later than 3 days after the determination, remove the record from the website of the Department of Justice and any other location where the record was published.

#### (e) Incentives

For each of fiscal years 2018 through 2022, the Attorney General shall give affirmative preference to all Bureau of Justice Assistance discretionary grant applications of a State or Indian tribal government that received a determination of substantial compliance under subsection (c) for the fiscal year in which the grant was solicited.

(Pub. L. 110–180, title I, §107, as added Pub. L. 115–141, div. S, title VI, §605(a), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1137.)

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
### §473. Technology Assessment Board

#### (a) Membership

The Board shall consist of thirteen members as follows:

(1) six Members of the Senate, appointed by the President pro tempore of the Senate, three from the majority party and three from the minority party;

(2) six Members of the House of Representatives appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, three from the majority party and three from the minority party; and

(3) the Director, who shall not be a voting member.

#### (b) Execution of functions during vacancies; filling of vacancies

Vacancies in the membership of the Board shall not affect the power of the remaining members to execute the functions of the Board and shall be filled in the same manner as in the case of the original appointment.

#### (c) Chairman and vice chairman; selection procedure

The Board shall select a chairman and a vice chairman from among its members at the beginning of each Congress. The vice chairman shall act in the place and stead of the chairman in the absence of the chairman. The chairmanship and the vice chairmanship shall alternate between the Senate and the House of Representatives with each Congress. The chairman during each even-numbered Congress shall be selected by the Members of the House of Representatives on the Board from among their number. The vice chairman during each Congress shall be chosen in the same manner from that House of Congress other than the House of Congress of which the chairman is a Member.

#### (d) Meetings; powers of Board

The Board is authorized to sit and act at such places and times during the sessions, recesses, and adjourned periods of Congress, and upon a vote of a majority of its members, to require by subpena or otherwise the attendance of such witnesses and the production of such books, papers, and documents, to administer such oaths and affirmations, to take such testimony, to procure such printing and binding, and to make such expenditures, as it deems advisable. The Board may make such rules respecting its organization and procedures as it deems necessary, except that no recommendation shall be reported from the Board unless a majority of the Board assent. Subpenas may be issued over the signature of the chairman of the Board or of any voting member designated by him or by the Board, and may be served by such person or persons as may be designated by such chairman or member. The chairman of the Board or any voting member thereof may administer oaths or affirmations to witnesses.

(Pub. L. 92–484, §4, Oct. 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 798.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB forthe period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Branagan President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

-  The Report	fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the	Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe	information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material	respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 

 

/s/ Paul Branagan                           

Paul Branagan

Chief Executive Officer

April 15, 2005