alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1609

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, 

Missouri, as the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1609 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, 

4 and known as the Brookfield Main Office, shall be known 

5 and designated as the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post Office 

6 Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

11 to the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk. 
2

•HR 1609 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, 

4 and known as the Brookfield Main Office, shall be known 

5 and designated as the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post Office 

6 Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

11 to the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2003. 

Attest: Jeff Trandahl, 

Clerk.
§ 317.201 Regulatory requirements. This part contains the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management which implement the following provisions of law: ( a ) Section 413 of title IV of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978;
( b ) Subchapter VIII of chapter 33 of title 5, U.S.C. on appointment, reassignment, and transfer in the Senior Executive Service; and
( c ) Subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 5, U.S.C. on reinstatement to the Senior Executive Service.
[45 FR 8541, Feb. 8, 1980]
NRC NEWS              U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                     Office of Public Affairs, Region I                            475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.                                                 www.nrc.gov 

No. I-07-035                                                                                                                        June 15, 2007Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330                      E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC, ENTERGY TO DISCUSS LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTIONCONDUCTED AT JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The results of a Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection of the aging management programfor the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant will be discussed on Thursday, June 21, at a meetingbetween NRC officials and the facility’s management.  The inspection is part of an ongoing NRCreview of a license renewal application for the plant, which is located in Scriba, N.Y., and operated byEntergy Nuclear Northeast.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. at the plant’s Joint News Center, located at theOswego County Airport, on Route 176 in Fulton, N.Y.  Members of the public are invited to observeand will have an opportunity to pose questions to NRC officials before the meeting is adjourned.

In August 2006, Entergy applied to the NRC for a 20-year extension of the operating license forthe FitzPatrick plant.  NRC reviews of license renewal applications usually take 22 months if there isno hearing involved.  An important aspect of the review process is to ensure that a plant can managethe effects of aging on key safety systems, structures and components through an effective monitoringand maintenance program.

The current operating license for the FitzPatrick plant is due to expire on Oct. 17, 2014.

A copy of the plant’s license renewal application is available via the NRC’s web site at:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/fitzpatrick.html .  Additionalinformation about the license renewal process is available at:www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

                                                                                   ###
#### Village of East Rochester, Appellant, v. County of Monroe et al., Respondents.

Same decision and like cause of action as in companion case of *Village of Fairport*v. *County of Monroe {ante,*p. 999), decided herewith. Present — McCurn, P- J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
§ 575.406 Adjustment or termination of supervisory differential. ( a ) An agency may establish procedures that allow for adjusting or terminating a supervisory differential at any time the agency determines it is appropriate to do so.
( b ) A supervisory differential shall be terminated when the continuing pay of the supervisor (not including the supervisory differential) exceeds the continuing pay of the highest paid subordinate whose position is not under the General Schedule.
( c ) A supervisory differential shall be reduced or terminated, as appropriate, when the continuing pay of the supervisor (including the supervisory differential) exceeds the continuing pay of the highest paid subordinate whose position is not under the General Schedule by more than 3 percent.
( d ) The effective date of a reduction or termination of a supervisory differential under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section shall be not later than 30 calendar days after the date on which the event that necessitates the reduction or termination occurs.
( e ) Each determination to adjust a supervisory differential shall be made in writing under procedures established by each agency similar to those established under § 575.404 of this part.
( f ) The reduction or termination of a supervisory differential may not be appealed. However, the preceding sentence shall not be construed to extinguish or lessen any right or remedy under subchapter II of chapter 12 of title 5, United States Code, or under any of the laws referred to in 5 U.S.C. 2302(d).
[56 FR 20338, May 3, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 37394, Aug. 19, 1992]
§ 2636.307 Requirement for advance authorization to engage in teaching for compensation. ( a ) *Authorization requirement.* A covered noncareer employee may receive compensation for teaching only when specifically authorized in advance by the designated agency ethics official.
( b ) *Definition.* For purposes of this section “teaching” means any activity that involves oral presentation or personal interaction, the primary function of which is to instruct or otherwise impart knowledge or skill. It is not limited to teaching that occurs in a formal setting, such as a classroom, but extends to instruction on an individual basis or in an informal setting.
( c ) *Request for authorization.* An employee may request authorization to engage in compensated teaching activities by forwarding a written request to the designated agency ethics official. The request shall describe the employee's official duties, the subject matter of the teaching activity, the entity sponsoring the course, and the student, class or audience to be taught. In addition, it shall set forth the terms of the compensation arrangement and identify the source of the payment. The request shall be accompanied by any contract or employment agreement and any literature describing, publicizing or otherwise promoting the class, classes or course.
( d ) *Standard for authorization.* Compensated teaching may be approved by the designated agency ethics official only when: ( 1 ) The teaching will not interfere with the performance of the employee's official duties or give rise to an appearance that the teaching opportunity was extended to the employee principally because of his official position;
( 2 ) The employee's receipt of compensation does not violate any of the limitations and prohibitions on honoraria, compensation or outside earned income contained in this part; and
( 3 ) Neither the teaching activity nor the employee's receipt of compensation therefor will violate applicable standards of conduct or any statute or regulation related to conflicts of interests.
( e ) *Determination and authorization.* The determination by the designated agency ethics official to grant or deny authorization to engage in teaching for compensation shall be in writing and shall be final. The authority of the designated agency ethics official to authorize compensated teaching may not be delegated to any person other than the alternate designated agency ethics official described in § 2638.202(b).
***Exhibit******32***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Allied Resources, Inc.for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to        §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:         

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuerat the endof the period covered by this report and resultsof operations of the small business issuerfor the period covered by this                report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: August14, 2008         

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Thiscertification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuerfor the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of        1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 hasbeen provided to the small business issuerand will be retained by the small business issuerand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.         

24
§ 319.301 Qualifications standards. ( a ) *General.* Agency heads are responsible for establishing qualifications standards in accordance with the criteria in this section. ( 1 ) The standard must be in writing and identify the breadth and depth of the knowledges, skills, and abilities, or other qualifications, required for successful performance in the position.
( 2 ) Each criterion in the standard must be job related.
( 3 ) The standard may not include any criterion prohibited by law or regulation.
( b ) *Standards for senior-level positions.* ( 1 ) The standard must be specific enough to enable applicants to be rated and ranked according to their degree of qualifications when the position is being filled on a competitive basis.
( 2 ) The standard may not include a minimum length of experience or minimum education requirement beyond that authorized for similar positions in the General Schedule.
( c ) *Standards for scientific and professional positions.* ( 1 ) Unless the agency obtains the approval of OPM, the standard must provide that the candidate have at least 3 years of specialized experience in, or closely related to, the field in which the candidate will work. At least 1 year of this experience must have been in planning and executing difficult programs of national significance or planning and executing specialized programs that show outstanding attainments in the field of research or consultation.
( 2 ) Agencies may require that at least 1 year of the specialized experience must be at least equivalent to experience at GS-15.
( 3 ) Agencies may require applicants to furnish positive evidence that they have performed highly creative or outstanding research where similar abilities are required in the ST position.
§ 532.511 Environmental differentials. ( a ) *Entitlements to environmental differential pay.* ( 1 ) In accordance with section 5343(c)(4) of title 5, United States Code, an employee shall be paid an environmental differential when exposed to a working condition or hazard that falls within one of the categories approved by the Office of Personnel Management.
( 2 ) Each installation or activity must evaluate its situations against the guidelines issued by the Office of Personnel Management to determine whether the local situation is covered by one or more of the defined categories.
( b ) *Amount of environmental differential payable.* ( 1 ) An employee entitled to an environmental differential shall be paid an amount equal to the percentage rate authorized by the Office of Personnel Management for the category in which the working condition or hazard falls, multiplied by the rate for the second step of WG-10 for the appropriated fund employees and NA-10 for the nonappropriated fund employees on the current regular non-supervisory wage schedule for the wage area for which the differential is payable, counting one-half cent and over as a whole cent.
( 2 ) An employee entitled to an environmental differential on an actual exposure basis shall be paid a minimum of one hour's differential pay for the exposure. For exposure beyond one hour, the employee shall be paid in increments of one quarter hour for each 15 minutes or portion thereof in excess of 15 minutes. Entitlement begins with the first instance of exposure and ends one hour later, except that when exposure continues beyond the hour, it shall be considered ended at the end of the quarter hour in which exposure actually terminated.
( 3 ) An employee entitled to an environmental differential on the basis of hours in a pay status shall be paid for all hours in a pay status on the day on which he/she is exposed to the situation.
( 4 ) An employee may not be paid more than one environmental differential for a particular period of work.
( 5 ) The payment of environmental differential pay is computed on the basis of the highest environmental differential rate authorized during the period of entitlement.
( 6 ) The number of hours an employee is paid environmental differential shall not exceed the number of hours of duty performed by the employee on the day of exposure except as required by paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
( c ) *Basic pay.* Environmental differential pay is part of basic pay and shall be used to compute premium pay (pay for overtime, holiday, or Sunday work), the amount from which retirement deductions are made, and the amount on which group life insurance is based. It is not part of basic pay for purposes of lump-sum annual leave payments and severance pay nor is its loss an adverse action.
( d ) The schedule of environmental differentials is set out as appendix A to this subpart and is incorporated in and made a part of this section.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981, as amended at 49 FR 49841, Dec. 24, 1984; 55 FR 46180, Nov. 1, 1990]
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0115

Focus Ready Draft 1/6/2011

ENGINEER: Macek \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

CRSS :

Chemical Name:

S-H20: Reacts g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: %<500 <1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat:

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (12/28/2010):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs: 

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN: P1B1T1

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
p110115.eng.txt

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0115

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. // // 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
p110115.eng.txt

Conservative: kg/site-day over days/yr from 

site

or kg/yr

to: 

from:

basis:

Output 2: kg/site-day over days/yr from site

or kg/yr

to: 

from: 

basis: 

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

Exposure to at concentration

High End: over days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0115

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
p110115.eng.txt

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. // 

High End: kg/site-day over days/yr from 

sites

or kg/yr

to:

from:

basis:

Conservative: kg/site-day over days/yr from 

sites

or kg/yr

to: 

from

basis:

High End of Range: kg/site-day over days/yr

from sites

or kg/yr

Low End of Range: kg/site-day over days/yr from

 sites

or kg/yr

to: 

from:

RELEASE TOTAL

 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
p110115.eng.txt

Exposure to 

Low End of Range: mg/day over days/yr

High End of Range: mg/day over days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis:

NOTE: The respirator class is: I

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

Dermal:

Exposure to at concentration

High End: mg/day over days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
Exhibits
                                    --------


Exhibit 3.0
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

Filed on January 9, 2004
Dean Heller
Secretary of State
204 North Carson Street, Suite 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(775) 684-5708
Website: secretaryofstate.biz

              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
           (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390-After Issuance of Stock)

Name of corporation: The name of this corporation is ZKID NETWORK COMPANY.

The  articles of  incorporation  have been amended as follows  (provide  article
numbers, if available:

ARTICLE IV is hereby amended to read as follows:

         Authorized Stock

         4.1      Authorized Stock. The corporation will have authority to issue
Five Hundred Ten Million  (510,000,000) shares of stock in the aggregate.  These
shares will be divided into two classes and designated as follows:

         (a) Five Hundred  Million  (500,000,000)  shares of Common  Stock,  par
value: $0.0001 per share which is non-assessable.

         All other provisions of Article IV remain unchanged.

The vote by which the stockholders  holding shares in the corporation  entitling
them to  exercise  at least a majority  of the  voting  power,  or such  greater
proportion  of the  voting  power  as may be  required  in the case of a vote by
classes or series,  or as may be required by the  provisions  of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is 66.9%.


Effective date of filing (optional):

Officer Signature (required): /s/ Jon A. Darmstadter

If any proposed  amendment  would alter or change any preference or any relative
or other  right  given to any class or series of  outstanding  shares,  then the
amendment  must be approved by the vote,  in  addition to the  affirmative  vote
otherwise  required,  of the  holders of shares  representing  a majority of the
voting power of each class or series  affected by the  amendment  regardless  of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

SUBMIT IN DUPLICATE

This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees. See attached fee schedule.
Nevada Secretary of State AM 78.385 Amend 2003, Revised on: 11/03/03
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-013 May 24, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT COLUMBIA GENERATING STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Energy Northwest officials on June

1, to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Columbia Generating

Station during 2005.

The 6 p.m. meeting at Energy Northwest’s Business Services Center, 3000 George

Washington Way, Richland, Wash., is open to public observation. Before the session ends, NRC

staff will be available to answer questions on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the

agency’s role in ensuring safe plant operation.

“Each year, the NRC assesses the performance of all of the nation’s commercial nuclear

power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “The meeting gives us an

opportunity to discuss our findings with the company, local officials and members of the public.

We look forward to meeting with members of the community and answering any questions they

may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2005 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wnp_2005q4.pdf .

Overall, Columbia Generating Station operated safely during the period. The NRC uses

color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear power plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. In addition to the baseline (or

routine) level of inspections during 2006, the NRC will focus attention on weaknesses in

problem identification and resolution. 
Two supplemental inspections were conducted earlier this year and have verified that

corrective actions have been taken to address a number of safety system failures and unplanned

reactor shutdowns that occurred in the past.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant operations to be inspected during the next year by NRC specialists are emergency

preparedness and radiological safety.

Current performance information for Columbia Generating Station is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WASH2/wash2_chart.html .

###