alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64072-64073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2003D-0383]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Recommended Glossary and Educational 
Outreach to Support Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In 
Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Recommended Glossary and 
Educational Outreach to Support Use of Symbols on Labels and in 
Labeling of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use'' 
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Robbins, Office of Management 
Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 5, 2004 
(69 FR 47448), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0553. 
The approval expires on October 31, 2007. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.


[[Page 64073]]


    Dated: October 27, 2004.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-24447 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-121 October 18, 2002

 

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by Entergy Operations to increase

the generating capacity of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station by 1.7 percent. 

The power uprate at the plant, located near Port Gibson, Mississippi, will increase the generating

capacity of Unit 1 from 1210 megawatts electric to 1232. The licensee intends to implement the power

uprate immediately.

The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

The NRC staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor

primarily through increased feedwater flow measurement accuracy.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
 <PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
 <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       APR-30-1999
 <PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-31-1998
 <CASH>                                                    1,597,000
 <SECURITIES>                                                      0
 <RECEIVABLES>                                             1,488,000
 <ALLOWANCES>                                                 60,000
 <INVENTORY>                                               1,778,000
 <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          5,187,000
 <PP&E>                                                      410,000
 <DEPRECIATION>                                               90,000
 <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            5,781,000
 <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,174,000
 <BONDS>                                                           0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
 <PREFERRED>                                                       0
 <COMMON>                                                    144,000
 <OTHER-SE>                                                4,463,000
 <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              5,781,000
 <SALES>                                                   3,081,000
 <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          3,081,000
 <CGS>                                                     1,236,000
 <TOTAL-COSTS>                                             2,113,000
 <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
 <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
 <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
 <INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (268,000)
 <INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
 <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (268,000)
 <DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
 <CHANGES>                                                         0
 <NET-INCOME>                                               (268,000)
 <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (0.03)
 <EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.03)
                                                                

</TABLE>
### Served: June 26 , 201 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 2 6th of June , 2013 Essential Air Service at PADUCAH, KENTUCKY HANCOCK/HOUGHTON, MICH IGAN MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN PELLSTON, MICHIGAN SAULT STE. MARIE, MICHIGAN WATERTOWN, NEW YORK EAU CLARIE, WISCONSIN Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq . DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0299 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0302 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0301 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2011 - 0133 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0303 DOCKET DOT - OST - 1997 - 2842 DOCKET DOT - OST - 2009 - 0306

NOTICE OF EXTENSION FOR PROPOSALS AT PADUCAH, KENTUCKY; HANCOCK/HOUGHTON, MUSKEGON, PELLSTON, AND SAULT STE. MARIE,

MICHIGAN; WATERTOWN, NEW YORK; AND EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN By Order 201 3

- 5

- 13 , May 21 , 2013, the Department requested proposals for Ess e ntial Air Service at the above captioned communities, with proposals due no later than June 26, 2013. On June 26, Ameican Airlines requested a two

- week extension to that deadline. We w ill grant the extension request. Proposals at the seven communities listed above are now due on July 10 , 201 3

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
§ 2638.107 Government ethics responsibilities of agency heads. The agency head is responsible for, and will exercise personal leadership in, establishing and maintaining an effective agency ethics program and fostering an ethical culture in the agency. The agency head is also responsible for: ( a ) Designating employees to serve as the DAEO and ADAEO and notifying the Director in writing within 30 days of such designation;
( b ) Providing the DAEO with sufficient resources, including staffing, to sustain an effective ethics program;
( c ) Requiring agency officials to provide the DAEO with the information, support, and cooperation necessary for the accomplishment of the DAEO's responsibilities;
( d ) When action is warranted, enforcing government ethics laws and regulations through appropriate referrals to the Inspector General or the Department of Justice, investigations, and disciplinary or corrective action;
( e ) Requiring that violations of government ethics laws and regulations, or interference with the functioning of the agency ethics program, be appropriately considered in evaluating the performance of senior executives;
( f ) Requiring the Chief Information Officer and other appropriate agency officials to support the DAEO in using technology, to the extent practicable, to carry out ethics program functions such as delivering interactive training and tracking ethics program activities;
( g ) Requiring appropriate agency officials to submit to the Office of Government Ethics, by May 31 each year, required reports of travel accepted by the agency under 31 U.S.C. 1353 during the period from October 1 through March 31;
( h ) Requiring appropriate agency officials to submit to the Office of Government Ethics, by November 30 each year, required reports of travel accepted by the agency under 31 U.S.C. 1353 during the period from April 1 through September 30; and
( i ) Prior to any Presidential election, supporting the agency's ethics program in preparing for a Presidential transition.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# DATES:

Written comments should be received on or before December 2, 2004, to be assured of consideration.

## Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

*OMB Number:*                     1545-1904.                

*Revenue Procedure Number:*                     Revenue Procedure 2004-56.                

*Type of Review:*                     Extension.                

*Title:*                     Model 457 Plan Provisions.                

*Description:*                     This revenue procedure contains model amendments to be used by section 457(b) plans (deferred compensation plans) of state or local government.                

*Respondents:*                     Not-for-profit institutions.                

*Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers:*                     10,260.                

*Estimated Burden Hours Respondent/Recordkeeper:*                     4 hours.                

*Frequency of response:*                     On occasion.                

*Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden:*                     41,040 hours.                

*Clearance Officer:*                     R. Joseph Durbala, (202) 622-3634, Internal Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224.                

*OMB Reviewer:*                     Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., (202) 395-7316, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.                

Lois K. Holland,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-24362 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# L_2015208EN.01003901.xml

| 5.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 208/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 208/39

---

DECISION No 44/2015 OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE AGREEMENT ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

of 15 July 2015

related to the listing of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility [2015/1354]

THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and the United States of America and in particular Article 7 and 14;

Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| 1. | The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Conformity Assessment Body in Attachment A is added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

| 2. | The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The specific scope of listing, in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures, of the Conformity Assessment Body indicated in Attachment A has been agreed by the Parties and will be maintained by them.

This Decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by representatives of the Joint Committee who are authorized to act on behalf of the Parties for purposes of amending the Agreement. This Decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.

On behalf of the United States of America

James SANFORD

Signed in Washington DC, on 7 July 2015

On behalf of the European Union

Fernando PERREAU DE PINNINCK

Signed in Brussels, on 15 July 2015

---

Attachment A

EC Conformity Assessment Body added to the list of Conformity Assessment Bodies under column ‘EC access to the US market’ in Section V of the Sectoral Annex on Electromagnetic Compatibility

| INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS France S.A.S. |
| --- |
| 425 Rue de Goa, Le Cargo Bat. B6 |
| Zone des 3 Moulins |
| Antibes, 06600 |
| FRANCE |

INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS France S.A.S.

425 Rue de Goa, Le Cargo Bat. B6

Zone des 3 Moulins

Antibes, 06600

FRANCE

---
### §3063. Rules and regulations when cooperating with military departments

#### (a) Joint regulations

The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Commerce shall jointly prescribe regulations—

(1) governing the duties to be performed by the Administration in time of war; and

(2) providing for the cooperation of the Administration with the military departments in time of peace in preparation for its duties in time of war.

#### (b) Approval

Regulations under subsection (a) shall not be effective unless approved by each of those Secretaries.

#### (c) Communications

Regulations under subsection (a) may provide procedures for making reports and communications between a military department and the Administration.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §253, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3091.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 858 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.206 How does OPM establish COLA areas? ( a ) OPM designates, within nonforeign areas, areas where agencies pay employees a COLA by virtue of living costs that are substantially higher than those in the Washington, DC, area. In establishing the boundaries of COLA areas, OPM considers— ( 1 ) The existence of a well-defined economic community,
( 2 ) The availability of consumer goods and services,
( 3 ) The concentration of Federal employees covered by this subpart, and
( 4 ) Unique circumstances related to a specific location.
( b ) If a department or agency wants OPM to consider establishing or revising the definition of a COLA area, the head of the department or agency or his or her designee must submit a request in writing to OPM.
§ 359.605 Notice requirements. ( a ) Each career appointee subject to removal under § 359.604(b) is entitled to a specific, written notice at least 45 calendar days before the effective date of the removal. The notice shall state, as a minimum— ( 1 ) The action to be taken and its prospective effective date;
( 2 ) The nature of the competition, including the appointee's competitive area, if less than the agency, and standing on the retention register;
( 3 ) The place where the appointee may inspect the regulations and records pertinent to the action;
( 4 ) Placement rights within the agency and through OPM, including how the employee can apply for OPM placement assistance; and
( 5 ) The appointee's appeal rights, including the time limit for appeal and the location of the Merit Systems Protection Board office to which an appeal should be sent.
( b ) A career appointee who has received a notice under paragraph (a) of this section is entitled to a second notice in writing at least 1 day before removal from the SES. The notice shall state, as a minimum— ( 1 ) The basis for the removal, *i.e.,* 5 U.S.C. 3595(b)(5) if the basis is expiration of the 45-day OPM placement period, or 5 U.S.C. 3595(b)(4) if the basis is declination of a reasonable offer of placement, in which case identify the position offered and the date on which it was declined;
( 2 ) The effective date of the removal;
( 3 ) Placement rights outside the SES and, when applicable, the appointee's eligibility for discontinued service retirement in lieu of placement; and
( 4 ) Reminder of the appointee's appeal rights.
[60 FR 6389, Feb. 2, 1995]
### §46. Tchula Lake, Mississippi

Tchula Lake, in Holmes County, in the State of Mississippi, is declared to be a nonnavigable stream within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

The right of Congress to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(July 1, 1922, ch. 266, §§1, 2, 42 Stat. 816.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The two sentences comprising this section are, respectively, sections 1 and 2 of act July 1, 1922, entitled "An act declaring Tchula Lake, Holmes County, Mississippi, to be a nonnavigable stream".
§ 330.605 Agency responsibilities for deciding who is well-qualified. ( a ) An agency must define what constitutes a well-qualified candidate for its specific vacancies, consistent with this subpart, and uniformly apply that definition to all CTAP eligibles being considered for the vacancy.
( b ) An agency must conduct an independent second review and document the specific job-related reasons whenever a CTAP eligible is determined to be not well-qualified under the agency's definition. The agency must give the CTAP eligible the written results of this review as required by § 330.608(e).
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-07-014 May 10, 2007

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE

 AT WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT MAY 17

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet on May 17, with representatives of

Entergy Operations, Inc., to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at

the Waterford 3 nuclear plant near New Orleans, La.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. at the

Entergy Education Center, 4224 Highway 3127, Killona, La. The NRC staff will be available to

answer questions from the public on the safety performance of Waterford 3, as well as the NRC’s

role in ensuring safe plant operation before the end of the meeting.

 “The NRC continually reviews the performance of Waterford 3 and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett said. 

“This meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety

performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2006 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/wat_2006q4.pdf.

The NRC utilizes color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess

nuclear power plant performance. The colors start with "green" and then increase to "white,"

"yellow" or "red," commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

The NRC said Waterford 3 operated safely during 2006 and will receive baseline, or

routine inspections, during 2007.
Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant performance to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are activities associated with

engineering, fire protection, emergency preparedness, maintenance and radiological controls.

Current performance information for Waterford 3 is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/WAT3/wat3_chart.html.

 

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
(January 19, 1948.)

#### Dominick De Filippo, an Infant, by Michael De Filippo, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for injuries sustained when struck by one of defendant’s trolley cars, and by his father for expenses and loss of services. Judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on the verdict of a jury, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
§ 359.501 General. ( a ) *Coverage.* ( 1 ) This subpart covers— ( i ) A career appointee who has completed the probationary period in the SES; and
( ii ) A career appointee who is not required to serve a probationary period in the SES.
( 2 ) This subpart does not cover, however, a career appointee who is serving as a reemployed annuitant. See subpart I of this part for removal of a reemployed annuitant.
( b ) *Definitions* — ( 1 ) *Final rating* means the rating of record made by an appointing authority under the SES performance appraisal system in accordance with the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(3) and part 430, subpart C, of this chapter.
( 2 ) A *less than fully successful* final rating means a rating of unsatisfactory or minimally satisfactory.
( c ) *Optional removal from the SES.* The agency may remove a career appointee from the SES after the appointee has been given one final rating of unsatisfactory.
( d ) *Mandatory removal from the SES.* The agency must remove a career appointee from the SES after— ( 1 ) The appointee has been given two final ratings of unsatisfactory within 5 consecutive years; or
( 2 ) The appointee has been given two final ratings of less than fully successful within 3 consecutive years.