alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Dex Media East LLC as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 14, 2006
    
    November 14, 2006
  36
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Rafi Amit, Chief Executive
Officer of Camtek Ltd., and Mira Rosenzweig, Chief Financial Officer of Camtek Ltd., each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report for Camtek Ltd. on Form 20-F/A
for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in the annual report on Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Camtek Ltd.

Date: November 9, 2009

| |  | By:  /s/ Rafi Amit
 Rafi AmitChief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Mira Rosenzweig
Mira Rosenzweig Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Camtek Ltd. and will be retained by
Camtek Ltd. and furnished to the United States Securities And Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



---

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134948 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ALBERTA WASHINGTON, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Justices Estate of Barbara Richardson,

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134948 

 COA: 266487 

Washtenaw CC: 04-000909-NH 

GLACIER HILLS NURSING 

CENTER, d/b/a GLACIER 

HILLS, INC.,

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

KRISTEN TYSZKOWSKI, M.D. and 

LONA MODY, M.D.,

 Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., not participating, due to a familial relationship with counsel of 

record. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
§ 5501.107 Teaching, speaking and writing by special Government employees in the Public Health Service. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to special Government employees in the Public Health Service who otherwise are prohibited from accepting compensation for teaching, speaking or writing that is related to their official duties, within the meaning of 5 CFR 2635.807(a)(2)(i)(C), because the invitation or the offer of compensation for the activity was extended at a time when the special Government employee was assigned to perform official duties that may substantially affect the interests of the inviter or offeror.
( b ) *Permissible compensation.* A special Government employee may accept compensation for teaching, speaking or writing in circumstances described in paragraph (a) of this section only where the special Government employee recuses from the official assignment that may substantially affect the interests of the person who extended the invitation to engage in the activity or the offer of compensation.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 20-2921

_____________

LIFE CELEBRATION, INC.,

Appellant

v.

XEROX CORPORATION

 

______________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(District Court No. 2:18-CV-02941)

District Judge: Hon. Gene E.K. Pratter

Argued May 20, 2021

Before: McKee, Restrepo, Fuentes, Circuit Judges.

(Opinion filed: June 11, 2021)

Joseph R. Podraza, Jr. [ARGUED]

William H. Trask

Lamb McErlane

One South Broad Street, Suite 1500

Philadelphia, PA 19107

Counsel for Appellant

Benjamin D. Hartwell

Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy

1835 Market Street, Suite 650

Philadelphia, PA 19103
2

Tony R. Sears [ARGUED]

Ward Greenberg Heller & Reidy

1800 Bausch & Lomb Place

Legacy Tower

Rochester, NY 14604

Counsel for Appellee

_______________________

OPINION*

_______________________

McKee, Circuit Judge.

Life Celebration appeals the dismissal of its claim that Xerox breached its duty as 

a landlord by failing to inspect and maintain the HVAC system and other environmental 

controls in the space Life Celebration subleased from Xerox. The district court held that

Life Celebration did not present evidence that Xerox owed the prerequisite duty and 

granted summary judgment. We agree and will affirm.

In a thorough and well-reasoned Memorandum Opinion, the district court

explained why it granted summary judgment.1 The court carefully considered and 

rejected Life Celebration’s argument that Xerox owed the asserted duty. Life Celebration 

failed to provide evidence from the Managed Service Agreement between it and Xerox or

present arguments based on relevant principles of property law that this duty indeed 

existed. We can add little to elaborate on the district court’s analysis and discussion. 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.

1 Life Celebration, Inc. v. Xerox Corp., No. 18-2941, 2020 WL 5096945 (E.D Pa Aug. 

28, 2020).
3

Accordingly, we will affirm the district court substantially for the reasons set forth in its 

August 28, 2020 Memorandum and Order.
§ 550.706 Criteria for meeting the requirement for involuntary separation. ( a ) An employee who resigns because he or she expects to be involuntarily separated is considered to have been involuntarily separated if the employee resigns after receiving— ( 1 ) Specific written notice that he or she will be involuntarily separated by a particular action effective on a particular date; or
( 2 ) A general written notice of reduction in force or transfer of functions which— ( i ) Is issued by a properly authorized agency official;
( ii ) Announces that the agency has decided to abolish, or transfer to another commuting area, all positions in the competitive area (as defined in § 351.402 of this chapter) by a particular date (no more than 1 year after the date of the notice); and
( iii ) States that, for all employees in that competitive area, a resignation following receipt of the notice constitutes an involuntary separation for severance pay purposes.
( b ) Except for resignations under the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this section, all resignations are voluntary separations and do not carry entitlement to severance pay.
( c ) A resignation is not considered an involuntary separation if the specific or general written notice is canceled before the separation (based on that resignation) takes effect.
[55 FR 6593, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 64 FR 69177, Dec. 10, 1999]
#### Adelia Bovee, Appellant, *v.*Melvin N. King, Respondent.

(Argued November 27, 1878;

decided December 10, 1878.)

Reported below, 11 Hun, 250.

*Thomas Corlett*for appellant.

*S. M. Bangs*for respondent.

Agree to affirm without opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-004 January 28, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

 TO GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has assigned Andrew Barrett as resident

inspector at the Grand Gulf nuclear plant near Port Gibson, Miss. 

“Andrew Barrett’s inspection skills, questioning attitude and commitment to safety will

help the NRC ensure that Grand Gulf conducts operations with the highest safety standards to

protect public health and safety,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett.

Barrett joins Tim Hoeg and Geoff Miller, the current resident inspectors at the plant. He

will fill a vacancy that will occur when Hoeg transfers to the Saint Lucie nuclear plant in Florida

in February, and Miller replaces him as the senior NRC inspector at Grand Gulf.

In August 2003, Barrett joined the NRC at the Region IV office in Arlington, Tx., as a

reactor engineer, and was named a project engineer several months later. Prior to joining the

NRC, Barrett graduated from Texas A&M University with a Bachelor of Science degree in

nuclear engineering in 1997. He then worked as a nuclear engineer at River Bend Station in St.

Francisville, La. He subsequently worked for ILD Services, a nuclear contracting company based

in Baton Rouge, La., as a field engineer.

 Barrett and his wife will reside in Port Gibson, Miss.

Each of the country’s commercial nuclear plants has resident inspectors who serve as the

agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The resident inspectors at Grand Gulf

can be reached at (601) 437-4620.
###
#### Boyce *vs.*Boyce.

Permanent alimony, for wife alone, fixed at SI000 a year, that being a sum which would provide for her a support and maintenance equal to what she would have had a right to expect if living with her husband.

Appplication to fix amount of permanent alimony.

*Mr. W. B. Williams,*for complainant.

*Mr. R. Gilchrist,*for defendant.

The Chancellor.

By the final decree in this cause, made on the 13th of March, 1873, it was decreed that the complainant' is entitled to have a suitable support and maintenance paid and provided by the defendant, her husband, for her, commencing on the 27th day of June, 1864, and that the defendant give reasonable security for such maintenance. By the decree, a reference to a master was ordered, to ascertain and report the amount of the defendant’s estate, and his income from that and all other sources. The report has been filed, and the matter now *434comes before me, on the equity reserved, to fix the amount of the alimony. It appears from the report that the value of the defendant's whole estate is $66,396 ; that the value of his real estate is $34,.000, and the value of his personal estate is $32,396; that his average annual income from both, and from all other sources, for the ten years preceding May 1st, 1875, was $5818.10, and that his income from that date to the date of the report, October 1st, 1875, showed an income for the year ending May 1st, 1876, of $6474.36. By an order of this court, made on the 10th of September, 1866, the defendant was ordered to pay alimony, *pendente lite,*at the rate of $12 a week, and by another order, made May 22d, 1871, the temporary alimony was increased to $15 a week. The. question now is as to the amount to be awarded for permanent alimony. Under the circumstances of the case, taking into consideration the situation and station in life of the parties, and the amount of the defendant's property and income, I am of opinion that the sum of $1000 a year will be a proper provision for the support and maintenance of the complainant. This sum will provide for her a support and maintenance equal, in all respects, to that which, taking into consideration the amount of his income, she had a right to expect at-.the hands of her husband had she continued to live with him. Her counsel will be allowed an additional and final counsel fee of $300 for services in this court and the Court of Appeals; and to the master, for whose services in the reference the statutory fees are by no means a fair compensation, an additional allowance of $35 will be made.
§ 362.205 Reduction in force (RIF) and termination. ( a ) *Reduction in force.* Interns and Interns NTE are covered by part 351 of this chapter for purposes of RIF. ( 1 ) *Tenure Groups.* ( i ) An Intern serving under an appointment for an initial period expected to last more than 1 year is in excepted service Tenure Group II.
( ii ) An Intern NTE who has not completed 1 year of service, is in excepted service Tenure Group 0.
( iii ) An Intern NTE serving under a temporary appointment not to exceed 1 year, who has completed 1 year of current, continuous service, is in excepted service Tenure Group III.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Termination* — ( 1 ) *Intern.* As a condition of employment an Intern appointment expires 180 calendar days after completion of the designated academic course of study or career and technical education program, unless the Participant is selected for noncompetitive conversion under § 362.204.
( 2 ) *Intern NTE.* As a condition of employment an Intern NTE appointment expires upon expiration of the temporary internship appointment, unless the Participant is selected for noncompetitive conversion under § 362.204.
[89 FR 25773, Apr. 12, 2024]
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1822 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3751 West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Dosan Ahn Chang Ho Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 1822 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 3751 West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California, 

4 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dosan Ahn Chang 

5 Ho Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Dosan Ahn Chang Ho Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 20, 2004. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
----

**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | The                Quarterly                Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for                the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                  August                  11, 2005 | /s/                  Richard T. BrockRichard                  T.                  BrockChief                  Executive Officer                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                             |
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                             |
|                                                     |                                                                                                                                             |
| Dated:                  August                  11, 2005 | /s/                  Judith                  A. VitaleJudith                  A.                  VitaleChief                  Financial Officer |
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-090 August 2, 2004

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING AUGUST 17 ON ISSUES

ASSOCIATED WITH LARGE LOSS-OF-COOLANT ACCIDENTS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with interested stakeholders on August 17 in

Rockville, Md., to discuss issues relating to the possible use of risk information in setting requirements

for addressing large-break loss-of-coolant accidents at nuclear power plants.

The meeting will be held in the Auditorium at Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike,

from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. The discussions will assist NRC staff in formulating a regulatory analysis for

a possible rulemaking. Documents describing the basis for the rulemaking will be available on the

Internet at this address: http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/ .

Members of the public are invited to participate by discussing these issues with NRC staff at

designated points during the meeting. For more information on the meeting, contact George

Mencinsky at 301-415-3093 or via email at gjm@nrc.gov .

###
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Keith E. Palmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

/s/ Keith E. Palmer
Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President

Date:  December 1, 2006
#### § 250.103 Consequences of improper agency actions.

If OPM finds that an agency has taken an action contrary to a law, rule, regulation, or standard that OPM administers, OPM may require the agency to take corrective action. OPM may suspend or revoke a delegation agreement established under § 250.102 at any time if it determines that the agency is not adhering to the provisions of the agreement. OPM may suspend or withdraw any authority granted under this chapter to an agency, including any authority granted by delegation agreement, when OPM finds that the agency has not complied with qualification standards OPM has issued, instructions OPM has published, or the regulations in this chapter. OPM also may suspend or withdraw these authorities when it determines that doing so is in the interest of the civil service for any other reason.
§ 550.1633 Treatment of overtime supplement as basic pay. Regularly scheduled overtime pay within an agent's regular tour of duty is treated as part of basic pay or basic salary only for the following purposes: ( a ) 5 U.S.C. 5524a and 5 CFR part 550, subpart B, pertaining to advances in pay;
( b ) 5 U.S.C. 5595(c) and 5 CFR part 550, subpart G, pertaining to severance pay;
( c ) 5 U.S.C. 8114(e), pertaining to workers' compensation;
( d ) 5 U.S.C. 8331(3) and 5 U.S.C. 8401(4) and related provisions that rely on the definition in those paragraphs, pertaining to retirement benefits;
( e ) Subchapter III of chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, pertaining to the Thrift Savings Plan;
( f ) 5 U.S.C. 8704(c), pertaining to life insurance; and
( g ) For any other purposes explicitly provided for by law or as the Office of
Personnel Management may prescribe by other regulation.