alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nancy EBERT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, Defendant.

Slip Op. 06-45.

Court No. 05-00297.

United States Court of International Trade.

April 5, 2006.

*ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

POGUE, Judge.

On January 17, 2006, this court issued an Order to Show Cause why the cap*1321tioned case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The court established February 10, 2006 as the deadline for Plaintiff to establish such good cause for why this action should not be dismissed. Having received no showing of good cause by the Plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

*Name of Committee:*                         Safety and Occupational Health Study Section (SOHSS); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).                    

*Date:*                         February 20-21, 2019.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., EST.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

*Agenda:*                         The meeting will convene to address matters related to the conduct of Study Section business and for the study section to consider safety and occupational health-related grant applications.                    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Nina Turner, Ph.D., Scienitific Review Officer, NIOSH, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26506, (304) 285-5976;                         *nturner@cdc.gov*.                    

                        The Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Sherri Berger,

Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2018-27721 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
§ 185.126 Evidence. ( a ) The ALJ shall determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in this part, the ALJ shall not be bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, the ALJ may apply the Federal Rules of Evidence where appropriate, e.g. to exclude unreliable evidence.
( c ) The ALJ shall exclude irrelevant and immaterial evidence.
( d ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
( e ) Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if it is privileged under Federal law.
( f ) Evidence concerning offers of compromise or settlement shall be inadmissible to the extent provided in Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
( g ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to introduce rebuttal witnesses and evidence.
( h ) All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by all parties, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 185.125.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association (“KCMA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, Reston, VA. The nature and scope of KCMA's standards development activities are: The development of performance and construction standards for kitchen and vanity cabinets and performance standards for fabricated high pressure decorative laminate countertops.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24577  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 2635.106 Disciplinary and corrective action. ( a ) Except as provided in § 2635.107, a violation of this part or of supplemental agency regulations may be cause for appropriate corrective or disciplinary action to be taken under applicable Governmentwide regulations or agency procedures. Such action may be in addition to any action or penalty prescribed by law.
( b ) It is the responsibility of the employing agency to initiate appropriate disciplinary or corrective action in individual cases. However, corrective action may be ordered or disciplinary action recommended by the Director of the Office of Government Ethics under the procedures at part 2638 of this chapter.
( c ) A violation of this part or of supplemental agency regulations, as such, does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any person against the United States, its agencies, its officers or employees, or any other person. Thus, for example, an individual who alleges that an employee has failed to adhere to laws and regulations that provide equal opportunity regardless of race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), national origin, age, genetic information, or disability is required to follow applicable statutory and regulatory procedures, including those of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
# L_2015311EN.01005201.xml

| 26.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/52

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 297/2014

of 12 December 2014

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2015/2164]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2014 of 27 January 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 141/2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work, as regards statistics based on the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) by reason of the accession of Croatia to the European Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2014 of 27 January 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 141/2013 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1338/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics on public health and health and safety at work, as regards statistics based on the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) by reason of the accession of Croatia to the European Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 18z4 (Commission Regulation (EU) No 141/2013) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 R 0068: Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2014 of 27 January 2014 (OJ L 23, 28.1.2014, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 R 0068: Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2014 of 27 January 2014 (OJ L 23, 28.1.2014, p. 9).’

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EU) No 68/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 13 December 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 23, 28.1.2014, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 330.705 Applying ICTAP selection priority. ( a ) An agency must not appoint any candidate from outside its permanent competitive service workforce if there is an ICTAP selection priority candidate available for the vacancy, unless the personnel action to be effected is an exception under § 330.707.
( b ) ICTAP selection priority applies to a vacancy that: ( 1 ) Is at a grade or pay level with a representative rate no higher than the representative rate of the grade or pay level of the ICTAP eligible's current or last permanent position of record;
( 2 ) Has no greater promotion potential than the ICTAP eligible's current or last permanent position of record;
( 3 ) Is in the same local commuting area as the ICTAP eligible's current or last permanent position of record; and
( 4 ) Is filled during the ICTAP eligible's eligibility period.
( c ) An agency may appoint any ICTAP selection priority candidate for a vacancy.
( d ) ( 1 ) After an agency announces the vacancy and meets its obligation to any ICTAP selection priority candidates, the agency may appoint any other candidate from outside its current permanent competitive service workforce, under appropriate staffing procedures.
( 2 ) An agency may make additional selections or reissue selection certificates in accordance with its merit promotion program without readvertising for ICTAP eligibles only if the additional selections are made from the applicant pool established by the original vacancy announcement, including readvertisements for the same vacancy, under which ICTAP eligibles had an opportunity to apply.
( e ) An agency may deny an ICTAP eligible future selection priority for vacancies in that agency if the ICTAP eligible: ( 1 ) Declines an offer of a permanent appointment at any grade or pay level in the competitive or excepted service; or
( 2 ) Fails to respond within a reasonable period of time, as defined by the agency, to an offer or official inquiry of availability for a permanent appointment at any grade or pay level in the competitive or excepted service.
( f ) An agency may deny an ICTAP eligible future selection priority for a position previously obtained through ICTAP if the eligible was terminated or removed from that position under part 432 or 752 of this chapter.
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, v. 1165 Fifth Avenue Corporation et al., Defendants, and William C. Prentiss et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
#### § 610.301 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide uniform and equitable standards under which regular employees paid at daily, hourly, or piecework rates may be relieved from duty with pay by administrative order.
§ 4601.104 Additional rules for U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employees. The following rules apply to employees of CBP, except Special Government Employees, and are in addition to §§ 4601.101 through 4601.103 and §§ 4601.107 and 4601.108 of this part: ( a ) *Prohibitions on outside employment and activities.* ( 1 ) No CBP employee shall be employed by or engage in activities in support of or on behalf of a customs broker; international carrier; bonded warehouse; foreign trade zone as defined in 15 CFR 400.2; cartman; law firm engaged in the practice of customs, immigration, or agriculture law; entity engaged in the enforcement of customs, immigration, or agriculture law; importation or exportation department of a business; or business or other entity which engages in services related to agriculture matters where such agriculture matters relate to CBP's mission.
( 2 ) No CBP employee shall, in any private capacity, engage in employment or a business activity related to the importation or exportation of merchandise or agricultural products requiring inspection (other than a personal, routine consumer transaction unrelated to the operation of a business), or the entry of persons into or departure of persons from the United States.
( 3 ) No CBP employee shall engage in outside employment or activities for a non-profit or other organization that involve assisting persons with matters related to the entry of persons or merchandise into or the departure of persons or merchandise from the United States, or matters related to obtaining temporary or permanent residency, citizenship, adjustment of status, or other immigration-related benefits.
( b ) *Restrictions arising from employment of the spouse, relatives, members of the employee's household, or financial dependents.* ( 1 ) A CBP employee shall notify in writing his or her agency designee when any of the following circumstances exist: ( i ) The spouse of the CBP employee is employed in a position that the CBP employee would be prohibited from occupying by paragraph (a) of this section;
( ii ) A relative (as defined in 5 CFR 2634.105(o)), who is financially dependent on or who is a member of the household of the CBP employee, is employed in a position that the CBP employee would be prohibited from occupying by paragraph (a) of this section; or
( iii ) Any person, other than the spouse or relative of the CBP employee, who is financially dependent on or who is a member of the household of the CBP employee, is employed in a position that the CBP employee would be prohibited from occupying by paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) The CBP employee shall be disqualified from participating in an official capacity in any particular matter involving the individuals identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, or the employer thereof, unless the agency designee, with the advice and clearance of the CBP Chief Deputy Ethics Official, authorizes the CBP employee to participate in the matter using the standard in 5 CFR 2635.502(d), or the waiver provisions in 18 U.S.C. 208(b)(1), as appropriate.
§ 532.407 Promotion. ( a ) An employee who is promoted is entitled to be paid at the lowest scheduled rate of the grade to which promoted which exceeds the employee's existing scheduled rate of pay by at least four percent of the representative rate of the grade from which promoted.
( b ) If there is no rate in the grade to which an employee is promoted which meets the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section the employee shall be entitled to the higher of: ( 1 ) the existing scheduled rate of pay in accordance with part 536 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) the maximum scheduled rate of the grade to which promoted.
( c ) If the promotion is to a position in a different wage area, the agency shall determine the employee's pay entitlement as if there were two pay actions—a promotion and a reassignment—and shall process them in the order which gives the employee the maximum benefit.
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2015

No. 04-15-00227-CR

Arturo Rosales AKA Artemio Rosales-AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR1786

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for access to the appellate record is granted. We order the clerk of 

this court to send appellant, pro se, a copy of the record. We further order appellant’s pro se 

brief is due November 16, 2015. Appellant is advised that no extensions of time to file the pro 

se brief will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
August 6, 2009 

# GENEVAPIPE Concrete products. concrete reliability

The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency Room 3000, Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W . Washington, D

. C . 20460 Re: Coal combustion products; Dear Ms. Jackson: r 1 ; , p-_ 

## 3 AN

It has come to my attention that numerous entities have approached EPA in an effort to re- categorize coal combustion by-products, specifically fly ash, froma by-product of beneficial use to that of a by-product to be considered hazardous waste. You should be aware that the beneficial use of this particular product has increased significantly in recent years. When used in the manufacturing of concrete products many benefits are derived fromthe use of this by-product. It improves the ultimate compressive and flexural strength of the products. It also makes our products less permeable. The mitigation of alkali aggregate reactivity increases the lifetime of the concrete product by making it less corrosivewhile increasing durability. This type of by-product use should be applauded by the EPA . Currently, there is pending action at the EPAthat we believe will force these coal combustion products to be regulated under Subtitle Cof the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), or a hybrid approach of regulation under Subtitle Cfor disposal purposes but not as a hazardous waste for beneficial use. This scenario would severely impact the concrete community. Some state regulations actually prohibit the beneficial useof hazardous waste. This would severely impact the cost structure in those particular states. Most state DOT's are encouraging the use offly ash due to the product enhancement qualities. We feel that the use of fly ashshould not be re-categorized. Its current status meets the spirit of the EPAby finding a need and usefor a by-product material and recycling it. It not only improves our product, it enhances it, and in its hardened concrete state it is not a hazardous material . Re- categorizing this product will severely impact the cost of concrete across the country and is not sound governmental regulation. Phillip R

. OaTe Corporate Marketing Director Geneva Pipe Company Orem, Utah

1465 West 400 North, Orem . Utah $4057 www .genevapfpe.cam T:$01 .22S 2416 F .801 2P5,2457 Toll Free 888,225.241bH C o~ ~ W O

tn VO

O Od'N-qP o , op > O

~~ W 0 I, .a4~0 

## rtlll ~ °

. l o

O J 

### °~liNn o o aa



### e ch

-



# LPI W 

# a a W Z W a 

# a 0 0 a v .. v 

# w x j , © ~ o 

# ,4 t- 4) 1

# 115 J -- T 

# w 4 u

3 ~~ , . a°- ,° .~ :
### §1327. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title III, §317, as added Oct. 18, 1972, Pub. L. 92–500, §2, 86 Stat. 877, authorized Administrator to investigate and study feasibility of alternate methods of financing cost of preventing, controlling, and abating pollution as directed by Water Quality Improvement Act of 1970 and to report to Congress, not later than two years after Oct. 18, 1972, the results of investigation and study accompanied by recommendations for financing these programs for fiscal years beginning after 1976.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 05-138 October 12, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL USES OF ISOTOPES 

TO MEET OCT. 25-26

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Medical Uses of Isotopes will

hold a public meeting Oct. 25-26 in Rockville, Md., where, among other items, members will review

the medical events definition commission paper and hear the status of Specialty Board applications for

NRC recognition.

The public portion of the meeting will be from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday and from 8 a.m.

to 5 p.m. on Wednesday. The meeting will be held at the NRC’s Two White Flint Building, Room

T2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike. Questions from the public will be permitted at the discretion of the

committee chairman. The full agenda can be found at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/acmui/agenda . 

Any member of the public wishing to submit a written statement or needing special assistance

must contact Mohammad Saba, at 301-415-7608 or mss@nrc.gov . A transcript and written comments

will be available on the NRC’s Web site, at www.nrc.gov and through the NRC Public Document

Room on or about Jan. 26, 2006.

The ACMUI advises the NRC on policy and technical issues related to the regulation of

medical uses of certain radioactive materials.

###