64858 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

corrosion), a digital photo of the shafts (if 

available), the location (zone) in which the 

corrosion is found, the serial number of the 

airplane, the name of the inspector, the 

service bulletin number, and the date of the 

inspection. Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has approved the information 

collection requirements contained in this AD 

and has assigned OMB Control Number 

2120–0056. 

(1) If the inspections are done after the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the inspection. 

(2) If the inspections were done before the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD. 

Actions Accomplished per Previous Issue of 

Service Bulletin 

(c) Actions accomplished before the 

effective date of this AD in accordance with 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–57–036, 

including Appendix A, dated April 30, 2002; 

Revision ‘‘A’’, including Appendix A, dated 

May 17, 2002; or Revision ‘‘B’’, including 

Appendix A, dated July 4, 2002; are 

considered acceptable for compliance with 

the corresponding actions specified in this 

AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(d) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the 

Manager, New York ACO, is authorized to 

approve alternative methods of compliance 

for this AD. 

Incorporation by Reference 

(e) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, 

the actions shall be done in accordance with 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R–57–036, 

Revision ‘‘C’’, including Appendix A, dated 

January 30, 2003. This incorporation by 

reference was approved by the Director of the 

Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 

obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, 

Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station 

Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, 

Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 

FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 

1600 Stewart Avenue, suite 410, Westbury, 

New York; or at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/

code_of_federal_regulations/

ibr_locations.html.

Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed 

in Canadian airworthiness directive CF–

2002–41, dated September 20, 2002.

Effective Date 

(f) This amendment becomes effective on 

December 14, 2004.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

20, 2004. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 04–24629 Filed 11–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2004–CE–11–AD; Amendment 

39–13856; AD 2004–22–28] 

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon 

Aircraft Company Model B100 

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) 

Model B100 airplanes. This AD requires 

you to drill holes in the hot lip tube ‘‘B’’

nuts, tighten the ‘‘B’’ nuts to specified 

torque ranges, and secure the ‘‘B’’ nuts 

with safety wire. This AD is the result 

of reports of loose ‘‘B’’ nuts on the 

engine inlet that may loosen and permit 

a leak in the engine inlet anti-ice 

system. We are issuing this AD to detect 

and correct loose ‘‘B’’ nuts on the engine 

inlet, which could result in failure of 

the engine inlet anti-ice system and 

consequent ice buildup. This failure and 

ice buildup could lead to an engine’s 

ingestion of ice with loss of engine 

power or loss of engine.

DATES: This AD becomes effective on 

December 27, 2004. 

As of December 27, 2004, the Director 

of the Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of certain 

publications listed in the regulation.

ADDRESSES: You may get the service 

information identified in this AD from 

Raytheon Aircraft Company, 9709 E. 

Central, Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085; 

telephone: (800) 429–5372 or (316) 676–

3140. 

You may view the AD docket at FAA, 

Central Region, Office of the Regional 

Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 

2004–CE–11–AD, 901 Locust, Room 

506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Office 

hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pretz, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita 

Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 

Airport Road, Wichita, Kansas 67209; 

telephone: (316) 946–4153; facsimile: 

(316) 946–4407.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion 

What events have caused this AD?

The FAA has received six reports of 

loose ‘‘B’’ nuts on the Raytheon Model 

B100 engine inlet anti-ice system found 

during routine maintenance. These 

loose ‘‘B’’ nuts may permit a leak in the 

engine inlet anti-ice system that would 

result in failure of the system with 

consequent ice buildup on the engine 

inlet. 

What is the potential impact if FAA 

took no action? Failure of the engine 

inlet anti-ice system and consequent ice 

buildup could lead to an engine’s 

ingestion of ice with loss of engine 

power or loss of engine. 

Has FAA taken any action to this 

point? We issued a proposal to amend 

part 39 of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include 

an AD that would apply to certain 

Raytheon Model B100 airplanes. This 

proposal was published in the Federal 

Register as a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) on May 26, 2004 

(69 FR 29910). The NPRM proposed to 

require you to drill holes in the hot lip 

tube ‘‘B’’ nuts, tighten the ‘‘B’’ nuts to 

specified torque ranges, and secure the 

‘‘B’’ nuts with safety wire. 

Comments 

Was the public invited to comment?

We provided the public the opportunity 

to participate in developing this AD. We 

received no comments on the proposal 

or on the determination of the cost to 

the public. 

Conclusion 

What is FAA’s final determination on 

this issue? We have carefully reviewed 

the available data and determined that 

air safety and the public interest require 

adopting the AD as proposed except for 

minor editorial corrections. We have 

determined that these minor 

corrections: 

—Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM for 

correcting the unsafe condition; and 

—Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM. 

Changes to 14 CFR Part 39—Effect on 

the AD 

How does the revision to 14 CFR part 

39 affect this AD? On July 10, 2002, the 

FAA published a new version of 14 CFR 

part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), 

which governs the FAA’s AD system. 

This regulation now includes material 

that relates to altered products, special 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 64859

flight permits, and alternative methods 

of compliance. This material previously 

was included in each individual AD. 

Since this material is included in 14 

CFR part 39, we will not include it in 

future AD actions. 

Costs of Compliance 

How many airplanes does this AD 

impact? We estimate that this AD affects 

96 airplanes in the U.S. registry. 

What is the cost impact of this AD on 

owners/operators of the affected 

airplanes? We estimate the following 

costs to do the inspection and 

modification:

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

4 workhours × $65 per hour = $260 .......................................................... Not Applicable ................................. $260 $24,960

Regulatory Findings 

Will this AD impact various entities?

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

Will this AD involve a significant rule 

or regulatory action? For the reasons 

discussed above, I certify that this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a summary of the costs 

to comply with this AD and placed it in 

the AD Docket. You may get a copy of 

this summary by sending a request to us 

at the address listed under ADDRESSES.

Include ‘‘AD Docket No. 2004–CE–11–

AD’’ in your request.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the Federal Aviation Administration 

amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation 

Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

■ 2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding a 

new AD to read as follows:

2004–22–28 Raytheon Aircraft Company:

Amendment 39–13856; Docket No. 

2004–CE–11–AD. 

When Does This AD Become Effective? 

(a) This AD becomes effective on December 

27, 2004. 

What Other ADs Are Affected by This 

Action? 

(b) None. 

What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD? 

(c) This AD affects Model B100 airplanes, 

serial numbers BE–1 through BE–136, that 

are certificated in any category. 

What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in 

This AD? 

(d) This AD is the result of reports of loose 

‘‘B’’ nuts on the engine inlet that may loosen 

and permit a leak in the engine inlet anti-ice 

system. The actions specified in this AD are 

intended to detect and correct loose ‘‘B’’ nuts 

on the engine inlet, which could result in 

failure of the engine inlet anti-ice system and 

consequent ice buildup. This failure and ice 

buildup could lead to an engine’s ingestion 

of ice with loss of engine power or loss of 

engine. 

What Must I Do To Address This Problem? 

(e) To address this problem, you must do 

the following:

Actions Compliance Procedures 

(1) Drill a 0.035-inch hole in each of the hot 

tube ‘‘B’’ nuts (part number (P/N) AN818–6D 

and AN818–8D). 

Within the next 150 hours time-in-service 

(TIS) or 6 calendar months after December 

27, 2004 (the effective date of this AD), 

whichever occurs first. 

Follow Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service 

Bulletin No. SB 30–3143, dated September 

2001. The applicable airplane maintenance 

manual also addresses this issue. 

(2) Tighten the hot lip tube ‘‘B’’ nuts to a specified torque range: 

(i) Tighten hot lip tube ‘‘B’’ nuts P/N AN818–6D 

to a torque range of 75 to 125 inch-pounds. 

(ii) Tighten hot lip tube ‘‘B’’ nuts P/N AN818–8D 

to a torque range of 150 to 250 inch-pounds. 

Before further flight after the actions required 

by paragraph (e)(1) of the AD. 

Follow Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service 

Bulletin No. SB 30–3143, dated September 

2001. The applicable airplane maintenance 

manual also addresses this issue. 

(3) Secure the hot lip tube ‘‘B’’ nuts (P/N 

AN818–6D and AN818–8D) with safety wire. 

Before further flight after the actions required 

by paragraph (e)(2) of this AD. 

Follow Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service 

Bulletin No. SB 30–3143, dated September 

2001. The applicable airplane maintenance 

manual also addresses this issue. 

May I Request an Alternative Method of 

Compliance? 

(f) You may request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD by following the procedures in 14 

CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, 

send your request to your principal 

inspector. The principal inspector may add 

comments and will send your request to the 

Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), FAA. For information on any already 

approved alternative methods of compliance, 

contact Jeff Pretz, Aerospace Engineer, 

Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, 

Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946–

4153; facsimile: (316) 946–4407. 

Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by 

Reference? 

(g) You must do the actions required by 

this AD following the instructions in 

Raytheon Aircraft Mandatory Service 

Bulletin No. SB 30–3143, dated September 

2001. The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

64860 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

this service bulletin in accordance with 5 

U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may get 

a copy from Raytheon Aircraft Company, 

9709 E. Central, Wichita, Kansas 67201–

0085; telephone: (800) 429–5372 or (316) 

676–3140. You may review copies at FAA, 

Central Region, Office of the Regional 

Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, 

Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives 

and Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/

code_of_federal_regulations/

ibr_locations.html.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

October 27, 2004. 

David R. Showers, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 04–24630 Filed 11–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01–04–139] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations: 

Fort Point Channel, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation 

from regulations. 

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast 

Guard District, has issued a temporary 

deviation from the drawbridge operation 

regulations for the Northern Avenue 

Bridge, mile 0.1, across Fort Point 

Channel, at Boston, Massachusetts. This 

temporary deviation allows the bridge to 

remain in the closed position from 

December 1, 2004, through December 

31, 2004. This temporary deviation is 

necessary to facilitate mechanical 

repairs at the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

December 1, 2004, through December 

31, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast 

Guard District, at (617) 223–8364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Northern Avenue Bridge has a vertical 

clearance of 7 feet at mean high water 

and 17 feet at mean low water in the 

closed position. The existing regulations 

are listed at 33 CFR 117.599. 

The bridge owner, the City of Boston, 

requested a temporary deviation from 

the drawbridge operating regulations to 

facilitate necessary mechanical repairs, 

the replacement of the bridge operating 

gears, at the bridge. The bridge cannot 

open during the prosecution of these 

mechanical repairs. 

Under this temporary deviation the 

bridge may remain in the closed 

position from December 1, 2004, 

through December 31, 2004. 

This deviation from the operating 

regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 

117.35 and will be performed with all 

due speed in order to return the bridge 

to normal operation as soon as possible.

Dated: October 26, 2004. 

David P. Pekoske, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

First Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 04–24970 Filed 11–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01–04–132] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations: 

Newtown Creek, Dutch Kills, English 

Kills, and Their Tributaries, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation 

from regulations. 

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast 

Guard District, has issued a temporary 

deviation from the drawbridge operation 

regulations for the Metropolitan Avenue 

Bridge, mile 3.4, across English Kills at 

New York City, New York. Under this 

temporary deviation the bridge may 

remain closed from 6 a.m. to midnight 

on the following days: November 10 

through November 12; November 17 

through November 19; November 22 

through November 24; and December 1 

through December 3, 2004. The 

temporary deviation is necessary to 

facilitate bridge maintenance.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

November 10, 2004, through December 

3, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy 

Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast 

Guard District, at (212) 668–7195.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Metropolitan Avenue Bridge has a 

vertical clearance in the closed position 

of 10 feet at mean high water and 15 feet 

at mean low water. The existing 

drawbridge operation regulations are 

listed at 33 CFR 117.801(e). 

The owner of the bridge, New York 

City Department of Transportation 

(NYCDOT), requested a temporary 

deviation from the drawbridge operation 

regulations to facilitate rehabilitation 

repairs at the bridge. The bridge must 

remain in the closed position to perform 

these repairs. 

Under this temporary deviation the 

NYCDOT Metropolitan Avenue Bridge 

may remain in the closed position from 

6 a.m. through midnight on the 

following days: November 10 through 

November 12; November 17 through 

November 19; November 22 through 

November 24; and December 1 through 

December 3, 2004. 

This deviation from the operating 

regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 

117.35, and will be performed with all 

due speed in order to return the bridge 

to normal operation as soon as possible.

Dated: October 30, 2004. 

David P. Pekoske, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, 

First Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 04–24971 Filed 11–8–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[R03–OAR–2004–WV–0001; FRL–7836–5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; West 

Virginia; Determination of Attainment 

and Redesignation of the City of 

Weirton PM10 Nonattainment Area to 

Attainment and Approval of the 

Maintenance Plan; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects an 

omission in the preamble language of a 

direct final rule pertaining to a 

determination of attainment and 

redesignation of the City of Weirton 

PM10 Nonattainment Area to attainment 

and approval of the maintenance plan 

submitted by the State of West Virginia.

DATES: This document will be effective 

on December 27, 2004, unless EPA 

receives adverse written comment by 

November 26, 2004. If EPA receives 

such comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. Please 

see EPA’s direct final rule published on 

October 27, 2004 (69 FR 62591), for 

instructions for submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Linda Miller, (215) 814–2068, or by email at miller.linda@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Throughout this document wherever