alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

89–012 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–120

AN EMERGENCY BUDGET REQUEST

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

HIS BUDGET REQUEST TO DESIGNATE THE ENTIRE AMOUNT PROVIDED IN THE 2001 EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT FOR RECOVERY FROM AND RESPONSE TO TERRORIST ATTACKS ON THE UNITED STATES AS AN EMERGENCY

REQUIREMENT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 251(b)(2)(A) OF THE BALANCED BUDGET AND EMERGENCY DEFICIT CONTROL ACT OF

1985

SEPTEMBER 19, 2001.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and

ordered to be printed

(1)

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, September 18, 2001.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: The House and Senate have just passed—

and I have signed into law—the 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States. This Act will allow the United States

to respond swiftly and surely to the evil and despicable acts of terror that were perpetrated against our fellow citizens. We will do so

in a way that will make Americans proud.

This important legislation provides $40 billion to provide assistance to the victims of the September 11th attacks and to deal with

the consequences of the attacks. The Act was crafted and enacted

with strong bipartisan cooperation, and I intend to continue our

work with such a bipartisan spirit in the coming days and months,

including consulting with the Congress on the allocation of the

funds as required by the Act.

Pursuant to the requirements in the Act, I hereby request and

designate the entire amount provided as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and

Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, as amended.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH.

Enclosure.

(3)

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT,

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET,

Washington, DC, September 14, 2001.

The PRESIDENT,

The White House.

The House and Senate have passed—and you have signed into

law—the 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United

States. The Act requires that you submit a budget request to Congress and designate the entire $40 billion as an emergency requirement as defined in the Balanced Budget and Emergency Control

Act of 1985, as amended.

I recommend that you request and designate this entire amount

as an emergency requirement in accordance with section

251(b)(2)(A) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control

Act of 1985, as amended.

Sincerely,

MITCHELL E. DANIELS, Jr.,

Director.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE
CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN LONG          
|                        |  | John Long              
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24


                            DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS OF
                              ARGO-TECH CORPORATION

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  The undersigned directors and officers of Argo-Tech
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, hereby constitute and appoint Paul R. Keen,
Frances S. St. Clair and Yoichi Fujiki, and each of them, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, as attorneys-in-fact or attorney-in-fact for
each of the undersigned, and in the name, place and stead of each of the
undersigned, to execute on behalf of each of the undersigned an Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1998 pursuant to Section 13 of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and to execute any and all amendments to
such report and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents
required to be filed in connection therewith, granting to each such attorney
full power to act with or without the others, and to have full power and
authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of each of the
undersigned, every act whatsoever necessary, advisable or appropriate to be done
in the premises, hereby ratifying and approving the act of said attorneys and
any of them and any such substitute.

                  This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the
person executing it.

                  EXECUTED as of January 28, 1999.



/s/ Michael S. Lipscomb                     /s/ Remi de Chastenet
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Michael S. Lipscomb, Chairman,             Remi de Chastenet, Director
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Frances S. St. Clair                    /s/ Thomas F. Dougherty
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Frances S. St. Clair, Vice President       Thomas F. Dougherty
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



/s/ Paul A. Sklad                           /s/ Yoichi Fujiki
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Paul A. Sklad, Controller                  Yoichi Fujiki, Vice President, 
(Principal Accounting Officer)             Treasurer and Director




/s/ Robert Y. Nagata                        /s/ Karl F. Storrie
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Robert Y. Nagata, Director                 Karl F. Storrie, Director
### SUBCHAPTER VI—VESSELS NOT UNDER WAY
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of her knowledge:

1.               The Registrant’sannual report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, to whichthis certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

**InWitness Whereof**, the undersigned has set her hand hereto asof the 7th day of November, 2006.
| /s/Nancy J. Baker                       |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

----
# L_2015202EN.01004301.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/43

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 191/2014

of 25 September 2014

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1259]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision 2014/276/EU of 2 May 2014 on amending Decision 2008/411/EC on the harmonisation of the 3 400-3 800 MHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision 2014/276/EU of 2 May 2014 on amending Decision 2008/411/EC on the harmonisation of the 3 400-3 800 MHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 5czd (Commission Decision 2008/411/EC) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 D 0276: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/276/EU of 2 May 2014 (OJ L 139, 14.5.2014, p. 18).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 D 0276: Commission Implementing Decision 2014/276/EU of 2 May 2014 (OJ L 139, 14.5.2014, p. 18).’

Article 2

The texts of Implementing Decision 2014/276/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 139, 14.5.2014, p. 18.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1793

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to protect employer rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. DEMINT (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. CARTER, Mr. BEREUTER, 

Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Ms. GRANGER, 

Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. PAUL, Mr. SOUDER, 

Mr. WICKER, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. MANZULLO) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to protect 

employer rights.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Employment 

5 Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that: 
2

•HR 1793 IH 

1 (1) An atmosphere of trust and civility in labor2 management relationships is essential to a produc3 tive workplace and a healthy economy. 

4 (2) The tactic of using professional union orga5 nizers and agents to infiltrate a targeted employer’s 

6 workplace, a practice commonly referred to as ‘‘salt7 ing’’ has evolved into an aggressive form of harass8 ment not contemplated when the National Labor Re9 lations Act was enacted and threatens the balance of 

10 rights which is fundamental to our system of collec11 tive bargaining. 

12 (3) Increasingly, union organizers are seeking 

13 employment with nonunion employers not because of 

14 a desire to work for such employers but primarily to 

15 organize the employees of such employers or to in16 flict economic harm specifically designed to put non17 union competitors out of business, or to do both. 

18 (4) While no employer may discriminate against 

19 employees based upon the views of employees con20 cerning collective bargaining, an employer should 

21 have the right to expect job applicants to be pri22 marily interested in utilizing the skills of the appli23 cants to further the goals of the business of the em24 ployer. 
3

•HR 1793 IH 

1 SEC. 3. PURPOSES. 

2 The purposes of this Act are—

3 (1) to preserve the balance of rights between 

4 employers, employees, and labor organizations which 

5 is fundamental to our system of collective bar6 gaining; 

7 (2) to preserve the rights of workers to orga8 nize, or otherwise engage in concerted activities pro9 tected under the National Labor Relations Act; and 

10 (3) to alleviate pressure on employers to hire 

11 individuals who seek or gain employment in order to 

12 disrupt the workplace of the employer or otherwise 

13 inflict economic harm designed to put the employer 

14 out of business. 

15 SEC. 4. PROTECTION OF EMPLOYER RIGHTS. 

16 Section 8(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

17 U.S.C. 158(a)) is amended by adding after and below 

18 paragraph (5) the following: 

19 ‘‘Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as requir20 ing an employer to employ any person who seeks or has 

21 sought employment with the employer in furtherance of 

22 other employment or agency status.’’.

Æ
§ 3601.106 Prior approval for outside employment and business activities. ( a ) A DoD employee, other than a special Government employee, who is required to file a financial disclosure report (OGE Forms 450 or 278e) shall obtain approval from the agency designee before engaging in a business activity or compensated outside employment with a prohibited source, unless general approval has been given in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. Approval shall be granted unless a determination is made that the business activity or compensated outside employment is expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or regulation. Approval of the DoD employee's business activity or compensated outside employment with a prohibited source will be annotated on the employee's annual financial disclosure report. Nothing in this part precludes a supervisor from providing the employee with written approval. For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Business activity.* Any business, contractual, or other financial relationship not involving the provision of personal services by the DoD employee. It does not include a routine commercial transaction or the purchase of an asset or interest, such as common stock, that is available to the general public.
( 2 ) *Employment.* Any form of non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the DoD employee. It includes, but is not limited to, personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, or trustee.
( 3 ) *Prohibited source. See* 5 CFR 2635.203(d) (modified by the separate DoD component agency designations in § 3601.102).
( b ) The DoD component DAEO or designee may, by a written notice, exempt categories of business activities or employment from the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section based on a determination that business activities or employment within those categories would generally be approved and are not likely to involve conduct prohibited by statute or regulation.
[88 FR 12543, Feb. 28, 2023, as amended at 88 FR 86029, Dec. 12, 2023]
### SUBCHAPTER II—TRAINING, TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH, AND EXPANDED USE
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1775 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1775

To amend title 36, United States Code, to designae the oak tree as the 
                  national tree of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2003

  Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Gross, and Mr. 
   Osborne) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 36, United States Code, to designate the oak tree as the 
                  national tree of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL TREE.

    (a) Designation.--Chapter 3 of title 36, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 305. National tree
    ``The tree genus Quercus, commonly known as the oak tree, is the 
national tree.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such title is amended--
            (1) in the table of contents for part A of subtitle I, by 
        striking ``, and March'' and inserting ``March, and Tree'';
            (2) in the chapter heading for chapter 3, by striking ``, 
        AND MARCH'' and inserting ``MARCH, AND TREE''; and
            (3) in the table of sections for chapter 3, by adding at 
        the end the following:

``305. National tree.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 10002.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement the provisions of the Sunshine Act.
( b ) Requests for all records other than those described in § 10002.9, shall be governed by the Council's Freedom of Information Act procedures at 5 CFR part 10001.
### §2304. Separability

If any provision of this Act, or the application of any provision of this Act to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, and the remainder of this Act, shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §949, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4201.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 99–662, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4082, known as the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2201 of this title and Tables.
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6511** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. FRANK LEON ROBINSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:98

- cr - 00523

- JFA

- 1 )

Submitted : July 11, 2012 Decided: July 18, 2012

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Frank Leon Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Barrett Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Frank Leon Robinson appeals the district c ourt ’ s order s denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and motion for reconsideration
. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we grant Robinson leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the denial of Robinson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district court
. United States v. Robinson , No. 1:98

- cr - 00523

- JFA

- 1 (D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012). Because the district court lacked the authority to consider Robinson’s motion to recons ider, see United States v. Goodwyn , 596 F.3d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court an d argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §475. Regulations for Pearl Harbor, Hawaii

For the proper control, protection, and defense of the naval station, harbor, and entrance channel at Pearl Harbor, Territory of Hawaii, the Secretary of the Navy is authorized, empowered, and directed to adopt and prescribe suitable rules and regulations governing the navigation, movement, and anchorage of vessels of whatsoever character in the waters of Pearl Harbor, island of Oahu, Hawaiian Islands, and in the entrance channel to said harbor, and to take all necessary measures for the proper enforcement of such rules and regulations.

(Aug. 22, 1912, ch. 335, 37 Stat. 341.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Naval Appropriation Act for 1913.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Hawaii as State

Admission of Hawaii into the Union was accomplished Aug. 21, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3309, Aug. 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6868, 73 Stat. c74, as required by sections 1 and 7(c) of Pub. L. 86–3, Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 4, set out as notes preceding section 491 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
§ 532.287 Special wage schedules for nonappropriated fund automotive mechanics. ( a ) The Department of Defense (DOD) will establish a flat rate pay system for nonappropriated fund (NAF) automotive mechanics. This flat rate pay system will take into account local prevailing rates, the mechanic's skill level, and the standard number of hours required to complete a particular job.
( b ) DOD will issue special wage schedules for NAF automotive mechanics who are covered by the flat rate pay system. These special schedules will provide rates of pay for nonsupervisory, leader, and supervisory employees. These special schedule positions will be identified by pay plan codes XW (nonsupervisory), XY (leader), and XZ (supervisory), grades 8-10, and will use the Federal Wage System occupational code 5823.
( c ) DOD will issue special wage schedules for NAF automotive mechanics based on annual special flat rate surveys of similar jobs conducted in each special schedule wage area. ( 1 ) The survey area for these special surveys will include the same counties as the regular NAF survey area.
( 2 ) The survey jobs used will be Automotive Worker and Automotive Mechanic.
( 3 ) The special surveys will include data on automotive mechanics that are paid under private industry flat rate pay plans as well as those paid by commission.
( 4 ) In addition to all standard North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes currently used on the regular surveys, the industries surveyed will include— 2022 NAICS Codes
2022 NAICS Industry titles 441110
New car dealers. 811111
General automotive repair. 811191
Automotive oil change and lubrication shops.
( 5 ) The surveys will cover establishments with a total employment of eight or more.
( 6 ) The special schedules for NAF automotive mechanics will be effective on the same dates as the regular wage schedules in the NAF FWS wage area.
( d ) New employees will be hired at step 1 of the position under the flat rate pay system. Current employees will be moved to these special wage schedules on a step-by-step basis. Pay retention will apply to any employee whose rate of basic pay would otherwise be reduced as a result of placement in these new special schedules.
[79 FR 22765, Apr. 24, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 4541, Jan. 24, 2024; 89 FR 8065, Feb. 6, 2024]