alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016129EN.01005301.xml

| 19.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 129/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 129/53

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 69/2015

of 20 March 2015

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2016/752]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2014 of 26 June 2014 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods, as regards the list of characteristics to be collected in the farm structure survey 2016 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2014 of 26 June 2014 amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods, as regards the list of characteristics to be collected in the farm structure survey 2016 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 23 (Regulation (EC) No 1166/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 R 0715: Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2014 of 26 June 2014 (OJ L 190, 28.6.2014, p. 8).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 R 0715: Commission Regulation (EU) No 715/2014 of 26 June 2014 (OJ L 190, 28.6.2014, p. 8).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 715/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 21 March 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 190, 28.6.2014, p. 8.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1658 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1658

    To amend the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance Validation Act to 
   validate additional conveyances of certain lands in the State of 
  California that form part of the right-of-way granted by the United 
States to facilitate the construction of the transcontinental railway, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2003

  Mr. Pombo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance Validation Act to 
   validate additional conveyances of certain lands in the State of 
  California that form part of the right-of-way granted by the United 
States to facilitate the construction of the transcontinental railway, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance 
Validation Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. VALIDATION OF ADDITIONAL RAILROAD CONVEYANCES, SAN JOAQUIN 
              COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 4 of the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance Validation Act 
(Private Law 103-2; 108 Stat. 5061) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraphs:
            ``(9) The conveyance entered into between the Central 
        Pacific Railway Company and the Southern Pacific Transportation 
        Company and the Bank of America, as trustee of the last will 
        and testament of Aaron Herschel, recorded September 27, 1945, 
        in volume 942 at page 104 of the official records of the county 
        of San Joaquin.
            ``(10) The conveyance entered into between the Central 
        Pacific Railway Company and the Southern Pacific Transportation 
        Company and the Tri-Valley Packing Association, recorded 
        November 13, 1957, in volume 2016 at page 149 of the official 
        records of the county of San Joaquin.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 351.201 Use of regulations. ( a ) ( 1 ) Each agency is responsible for determining the categories within which positions are required, where they are to be located, and when they are to be filled, abolished, or vacated. This includes determining when there is a surplus of employees at a particular location in a particular line of work.
( 2 ) Each agency shall follow this part when it releases a competing employee from his or her competitive level by furlough for more than 30 days, separation, demotion, or reassignment requiring displacement, when the release is required because of lack of work; shortage of funds; insufficient personnel ceiling; reorganization; the exercise of reemployment rights or restoration rights; or reclassification of an employee's position die to erosion of duties when such action will take effect after an agency has formally announced a reduction in force in the employee's competitive area and when the reduction in force will take effect within 180 days.
( b ) This part does not require an agency to fill a vacant position. However, when an agency, at its discretion, chooses to fill a vacancy by an employee who has been reached for release from a competitive level for one of the reasons in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, this part shall be followed.
( c ) Each agency is responsible for assuring that the provisions in this part are uniformly and consistently applied in any one reduction in force.
( d ) An agency authorized to administer foreign national employee programs under section 408 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 3968) may include special plans for reduction in force in its foreign national employee programs. In these special plans an agency may give effect to the labor laws and practices of the locality of employment by supplementing the selection factors in subparts D and E of this part to the extent consistent with the public interest. Subpart I of this part does not apply to actions taken under the special plans authorized by this paragraph.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2068

SATURNIN ALBAN CYRILLE YADAMA-GBEBRY,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the

United States,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-216-256)

Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,

Ralph Andrew Price, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney,

Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Saturnin Alban Cyrille Yadama Gbebry, a native and

citizen of the Central African Republic (“CAR”), petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) order

affirming and adopting the immigration judge’s decision denying

asylum, withholding from removal and withholding under the

Convention Against Torture. Gbebry also challenges the Board’s

decision denying the motion to remand to consider an application

for adjustment of status. We deny the petition for review.

An applicant has the burden of demonstrating his

eligibility for asylum. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2005); Gonahasa v.

INS, 181 F.3d 538, 541 (4th Cir. 1999). Credibility findings,

relevant to the subjective component, are reviewed for substantial

evidence. A trier of fact who rejects an applicant’s testimony on

credibility grounds must offer specific, cogent reasons for doing

so. Figeroa v. INS, 886 F.2d 76, 78 (4th Cir. 1989). This court

accords broad, though not unlimited, deference to credibility

findings supported by substantial evidence. Camara v. Ashcroft,

378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004).

A determination regarding eligibility for asylum or

withholding of removal is conclusive if supported by substantial

evidence on the record considered as a whole. INS v. EliasZacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Administrative findings of

fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be
- 3 -

compelled to decide to the contrary. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)

(2000). This court will reverse the Board “only if ‘the evidence

presented by the petitioner was so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.’”

Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting

Huaman-Cornelio, 979 F.2d at 999 (internal quotation marks

omitted)). We find with respect to Gbebry’s applications for

relief, the evidence does not compel a different result. We

further find the Board properly denied the motion to remand. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1810 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1810

  To require door delivery of mail sent to persons residing in senior 
                              communities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2003

  Mr. Saxton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require door delivery of mail sent to persons residing in senior 
                              communities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOOR DELIVERY OF MAIL REQUIRED FOR INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN 
              SENIOR COMMUNITIES.

    (a) In General.--The United States Postal Service shall take such 
measures as may be necessary to ensure that all individuals residing in 
senior communities shall receive their mail through door delivery 
service.
    (b) Senior Community Defined.--As used in this section, the term 
``senior community'' means a housing facility or community which is 
intended and operated for occupancy by individuals 55 years of age or 
older, and at least 80 percent of the occupied units of which are 
occupied by at least one individual who is 55 years of age or older.
    (c) Exception.--Nothing in this section shall be considered to 
require door delivery service for persons residing in a structure that 
consists of or contains 4 or more dwelling units.
    (d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to mail 
delivered after the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §10402. Tribal grant program authorized

#### (a) In general

From the amount reserved under section 1810(b),1 the Attorney General shall make grants to Indian tribes for programs to strengthen tribal juvenile justice systems and to hold tribal youth accountable.

#### (b) Eligibility

Indian tribes, as defined by section 5130 of title 25, or a consortia of such tribes, shall submit to the Attorney General an application in such form and containing such information as the Attorney General may require. Only tribes that carry out tribal juvenile justice functions shall be eligible to receive a grant under this section.

#### (c) Awards

The Attorney General shall award grants under this section on a competitive basis.

#### (d) Guidelines

The Attorney General shall issue guidelines establishing application, use, and award criteria and processes consistent with the purposes and requirements of this Act.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1801A, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12102(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1861.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1810(b), referred to in subsec. (a), is section 1810(b) of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, as added by Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12102(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1868, which was classified to section 3796ee–10 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and was omitted from the Code as obsolete.

This Act, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 90–351, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 197, known as the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1968 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ee–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 334.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement title IV of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) of 1970 and title VI of the Civil Service Reform Act. These statutes authorize the temporary assignment of employees between the Federal Government and State, local, and Indian tribal governments, institutions of higher education and other eligible organizations.
§ 531.412 Effective date of a within-grade increase. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a within-grade increase shall be effective on the first day of the first pay period following completion of the required waiting period and in compliance with the conditions of eligibility. Interim within-grade increases shall become effective as provided in § 541.414(b).
( b ) When an acceptable level of competence is achieved at some time after a negative determination, the effective date is the first day of the first pay period after the acceptable determination has been made.
[46 FR 2319, Jan. 9, 1981, as amended at 46 FR 41020, Aug. 14, 1981; 59 FR 24029, May 10, 1994]
### §10112. Senior Policy Advisor on Culturally Specific Communities within the Office of Justice Programs

#### (a) Establishment; duties

There shall be a Senior Policy Advisor on Culturally Specific Communities within the Office of Justice Programs who shall, under the guidance and authority of the Assistant Attorney General of the Office of Justice Programs—

(1) advise on the administration of grants related to culturally specific (as defined in section 12291(a) of this title) services and contracts with culturally specific organizations;

(2) coordinate development of Federal policy, protocols, and guidelines on matters relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking (as those terms are defined in section 12291(a) of this title), in culturally specific communities;

(3) advise the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs concerning policies, legislation, implementation of laws, and other issues relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking in culturally specific communities;

(4) provide technical assistance, coordination, and support to other offices and bureaus in the Department of Justice to develop policy and to enforce Federal laws relating to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking in culturally specific communities;

(5) ensure that appropriate technical assistance, developed and provided by entities having expertise in culturally specific communities, is made available to grantees and potential grantees proposing to serve culturally specific communities; and

(6) ensure access to grants and technical assistance for culturally specific organizations and analyze the distribution of funding in order to identify barriers for culturally specific organizations.

#### (b) Qualifications

The Senior Policy Advisor on Culturally Specific Communities shall be an individual with—

(1) personal, lived, and work experience from a culturally specific community; and

(2) a demonstrated history of and expertise in addressing domestic violence or sexual assault in a nongovernmental agency.

#### (c) Initial appointment

Not later than 120 days after March 15, 2022, the Assistant Attorney General of the Office of Justice Programs shall appoint an individual as Senior Policy Advisor on Culturally Specific Communities.

(Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title XIII, §1313, Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Act of 2022, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, and not as part of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as a note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,152,631
<SECURITIES>                                   175,809
<RECEIVABLES>                                  540,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (16,457)
<INVENTORY>                                    258,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,640,069
<PP&E>                                       1,174,451
<DEPRECIATION>                               (379,992)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,052,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,699,340
<BONDS>                                          1,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,223
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,191,788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,052,808
<SALES>                                      2,398,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,398,950
<CGS>                                        1,880,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,880,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,957
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                    72,372
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            131,491
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (11,851)
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,640
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
#### § 5501.112 One-year disqualification of employees of the National Institutes of Health from certain matters involving an award donor.

An employee, other than a special Government employee, of the National Institutes of Health who has, within the last year, accepted an award permitted under 5 CFR 2635.204(d) or § 5501.111 shall not participate in any particular matter involving specific parties in which the donor is or represents a party unless authorized to do so under 5 CFR 2635.502(d).

[70 FR 5564, Feb. 3, 2005]
§ 532.707 Availability of information. ( a ) The Office, upon a request which identifies the individual from whose file the information is sought, shall disclose the following information from an appeal file to a member of the public, except when the disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy: ( 1 ) Confirmation of the name of the individual from whose file the information is sought and the names of the other parties concerned;
( 2 ) The status of the appeal;
( 3 ) The results of the appeal (*i.e.,* proper title, pay plan, series, and grade);
( 4 ) The classification requested (*i.e.,* title, pay plan, series, and grade); and
( 5 ) With the consent of the parties concerned, other reasonably identified information from the file.
( b ) The Office will disclose to the parties concerned the information contained in an appeal file in proceedings under this part. For the purposes of this section, *the parties concerned* means the Government employee or former Government employee involved in the proceedings, his or her representative designated in writing, and the representative of the agency or the Office involved in the proceeding.
[50 FR 3313, Jan. 24, 1985]
§ 1210.6 Electronic filing procedures; expedited filing procedures. ( a ) *Required use of MSPB e-filing system.* All parties must electronically file all pleadings and documents listed in 5 CFR 1201.14(b) by using the MSPB's e-filing system (e-Appeal Online). An attempt to file an appeal using any other method will result in rejection of the appeal and will not constitute compliance with the 7-day filing deadline under the Act, except in the limited circumstances described in § 1210.7(c).
( b ) *Expedited filing and service requirements.* All documents and pleadings not otherwise covered in paragraph (a) of this section must be filed in accordance with any expedited filing and service procedures ordered by the administrative judge.
( c ) The parties should frequently check the Repository on e-Appeal Online to ensure that they are aware of new pleadings, orders and submissions in a timely fashion. A party's failure to check for updates on e-Appeal Online may lead to a denial of a request to extend a deadline and/or the imposition of sanctions.