alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Carroll,

Dec., 1898.

#### Davis *v.*Osgood.

The lien of a conditional vendor is not enforceable in this state, if invalid! by the law of the state where the sale was made.

Trover. Pacts found by the court. The plaintiff, at Ells-worth, Maine, sold and delivered to one Bicker, of Conway, in this county, three carriages, and in part payment therefor received from him time notes in which it was agreed that the carriages were to remain the plaintiff’s property until the notes and. interest thereon were paid. , The notes and the agreement were recorded in Conway, but were not recorded in Ellsworth. Subsequently, Bicker mortgaged the carriages to the defendant, who sold them under the mortgage. The notes have not been paid.

It is provided by the laws of Maine as follows : “ No agreement that personal property bargained and delivered to another, for which a note is given, shall remain the property of the payee until the note is paid, is valid unless it is made and signed as a part of the note . . . and unless it is recorded' like mortgages, of personal property.” Maine B. S., *c.*Ill, *s.*5. “No mortgage of personal property is valid against any other person than the parties thereto, unless possession of such property is delivered to and retained by the mortgagee, or the mortgage is recorded by the clerk of the city, town, or plantation organized for any purpose, in which the mortgagor resides. When all the *428mortgagors reside without the state, the mortgage shall be recorded in said city, town, or plantation where the property is when the mortgage is made.” *lb., c.*91, s. 1.

*James A. Fdgerly,*for the plaintiff.

*Frank Weeks,*for the defendant.

Pike, J.

The contract between the plaintiff and Ricker was a conditional sale of chattels in Maine, and its validity is to be tested by the laws of that state. *Cleveland Machine Works*v. *Lang,*67 N. H. 348, 363, and cases there cited. Since the con-ditional vendee resided in New Hampshire, the sale to be valid against “ any other person than the parties thereto ” required that the notes and agreement be recorded in Ellsworth, where the property was when the notes and agreement were executed. The neglect to have them so recorded was fatal to the plaintiff’s •claim. The provisions of our statute respecting the records of such sales (P. S., c. 140, *s.*23) apply only to sales that are made within the state. They have no extra-territorial force. *Cleveland Machine Works*v. *Lang, supra; Dorntee Casket Co.*v. *Gunnison, ante, p.*297.

*Judgment for the defendant.*

Blodgett, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET--DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         440,293
<SECURITIES>                                   116,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,503
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               625,714
<PP&E>                                         459,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,131,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,008
<BONDS>                                        808,799
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          478,788
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           547
<OTHER-SE>                                   (442,464)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,131,843
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,304
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (528,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (528,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (528,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (9.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.95)


</TABLE>
#### § 1620.44 Restoring forfeited agency automatic (1%) contributions.

If an employee's agency automatic (1%) contributions were forfeited because the employee was not vested when he or she separated to perform military service, the employee must notify the employing agency that a forfeiture occurred. The employing agency will follow the procedure described in § 1620.46(e) to have those funds restored.

[64 FR 31057, June 9, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 49526, July 30, 2002]
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 31
                    RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of Ambient Corporation, (the
"Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2005.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the
Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to me by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's 2005 fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting. February 24, 2006

                        /S/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                        JOHN J. JOYCE
                        PERSIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
                        FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
### §1107. Definitions

For the purposes of this subchapter, the term "marine science" shall be deemed to apply to oceanographic and scientific endeavors and disciplines, and engineering and technology in and with relation to the marine environment; and the term "marine environment" shall be deemed to include (a) the oceans, (b) the Continental Shelf of the United States, (c) the Great Lakes, (d) seabed and subsoil of the submarine areas adjacent to the coasts of the United States to the depth of two hundred meters, or beyond that limit, to where the depths of the superjacent waters admit of the exploitation of the natural resources of such areas, (e) the seabed and subsoil of similar submarine areas adjacent to the coasts of islands which comprise United States territory, and (f) the resources thereof.

(Pub. L. 89–454, title I, §8, June 17, 1966, 80 Stat. 208; Pub. L. 89–688, §2(b), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 1001.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–688 substituted "this title" for "this Act", which, for purposes of codification, has been changed to "this subchapter".
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection
with the annual report on Form 20-F of Yanzhou Coal Company Limited (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, WU Xiangqian, General Manager of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                             
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: April 26, 2016
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ WU Xiangqian            
|Name:                |  | WU Xiangqian                
|Title:               |  | Director and General Manager
```

[107th Congress Public Law 31]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ031.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 213]]

Public Law 107-31
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 504 West Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Edward 
 N. Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                        20, 2001 -  [H.R. 558]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 504 
West Hamilton Street in Allentown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Edward N. Cahn Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Approved August 20, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 558 (S. 757):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Feb. 28, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.
```
# L_2015311EN.01005501.xml

| 26.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/55

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 300/2014

of 12 December 2014

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2015/2167]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Council Regulation (EU) No 721/2014 of 16 June 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) as regards the extension of the Joint Undertaking until 2024 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to extend the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement to include Council Regulation (EU) No 721/2014 of 16 June 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR) as regards the extension of the Joint Undertaking until 2024 (1).

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for this extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in footnote 1 of paragraph 8b of Article 1 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0721: Council Regulation (EU) No 721/2014 of 16 June 2014 (OJ L 192, 1.7.2014, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0721: Council Regulation (EU) No 721/2014 of 16 June 2014 (OJ L 192, 1.7.2014, p. 1).’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2014.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 192, 1.7.2014, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the*Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, that:1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the *SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934*; and2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Allan J. Kent   Allan J. Kent  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2006  
Page 43
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased. Carl Rumolt, Appellant; Kate E. Munty, as Administratrix of the Estate of Leo R. Harkness, Deceased, Respondent.

Memorandum: We think the claimant failed to establish his claim against,the estate. We are unable to understand the decision of the Acting Surrogate allowing the claim in the amount of $1,080 as we find no evidence to support such a finding. However, as the administratrix has not appealed from the decree, this court can do nothing but affirm. All concur. (Appeal from a decree disallowing a claim against an estate for money due as share of partnership.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
### §10288. Due diligence in paying benefit claims

#### (a) In general

The Bureau, with all due diligence, shall expeditiously attempt to obtain the information and documentation necessary to adjudicate a benefit claim filed under this subchapter, including a claim for financial assistance under part B.

#### (b) Sufficient information unavailable

If a benefit claim filed under this subchapter, including a claim for financial assistance under part B, is unable to be adjudicated by the Bureau because of a lack of information or documentation from a third party, such as a public agency, and such information is not readily available to the claimant, the Bureau—

(1) may use available investigative tools, including subpoenas, to—

(A) adjudicate or to expedite the processing of the benefit claim, if the Bureau deems such use to be necessary to adjudicate or conducive to expediting the adjudication of such claim; and

(B) obtain information or documentation from third parties, including public agencies, if the Bureau deems such use to be necessary to adjudicate or conducive to expediting the adjudication of a claim; and

(2) may not abandon the benefit claim unless the Bureau has used investigative tools, including subpoenas, to obtain the information or documentation deemed necessary to adjudicate such claim by the Bureau under subparagraph (1)(B).

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1206, as added Pub. L. 115–36, §4, June 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 852; amended Pub. L. 117–61, §4, Nov. 18, 2021, 135 Stat. 1478.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796c–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 117–61 substituted "the Bureau—" and pars. (1) and (2) for "the Bureau may not abandon the benefit claim unless the Bureau has utilized the investigative tools available to the Bureau to obtain the necessary information or documentation, including subpoenas.".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–61 effective Nov. 18, 2021, and applicable to any matter pending, before the Bureau or otherwise, on Nov. 18, 2021, or filed (consistent with pre-existing effective dates) or accruing after that date, see section 8(a) and (b)(2) of Pub. L. 117–61, set out in a note under section 10281 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective June 2, 2017, and applicable to any benefit claim or application under this subchapter pending before the Bureau of Justice Assistance on such date or received by the Bureau on or after such date, see section 6 of Pub. L. 115–36, set out as an Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note under section 10282 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1625 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1625

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1114 Main Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, as the ``Robert P. Hammer Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1114 
Main Avenue in Clifton, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Robert P. Hammer Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert P. Hammer Post Office 
Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Keith E. Palmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)[omitted]; and

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

/s/ Keith E. Palmer
---------------------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President

Date: November 12, 2004

                                       18