alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: 

### Sent: To:



### Cc:


### Subject: Attachments:

Everyone:**~~)** ,._.,.,.,**~,;** q_: !] -21 Martin, Michael (OST) Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:55 PM Draylon Gant (dgant@greenvillems.org); Joshua Abramson Q.abramson@flytupelo.com); Tom Williams (twilliams@meridianairport.com); Tom Heanue; Barry Griffith (barryg@flytheshoals.com); John Dupree (mayor@hattiesburgms.com); John H. Cox III Qohncox@greenvillems.org); mayor@rtconnect.net Tim Sieber; Dave Hackett (dhackett@gosunair.com); Wade Steel (wade.steel@skywest.com);Mickey Bowman (mickeybowman@msn.com); Beale, Scott (sbeale@flyadi.com); cstork@airchoiceone.com; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); michael.mooney@sixelconsulting.com; 'lauren@seaportair.com' UPDATE: One more EAS proposal at Mississippi 5 and Muscle Shoals- Comments due July 9 Aerodynamics EAS bid -MEl, PIB, TUP- June 2014.pdf; Air Choice One EAS bid- MSL, GLH, TUP- June 2014.pdf; ExpressJet EAS bid MEl 

### & PlB- June 2014.pdf; SeaPort EAS proposal - TUP, MSL, GLH -June 2014.docx.pdf; SunAir EAS bid - MSL, GLH, PlB, TUPJune 2014.pdf

Myapologies- there was an oversight on my part. Disregard my earlier e-mail. Five aircarriers submitted proposalsfor EAS atthe Mississippi 5 and Muscle Shoals: Iwould like to update you on the Essential AirService (EAS) situation at Muscle Shoals, Alabama; Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg, Meridian, and Tupelo, Mississippi, as well as giveyou an opportunityto offerany comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant SecretaryforAviation and InternationalAffairs. We issued Order2014-4-24 (April22, 2014), requesting proposalsfrom airlines interested in providing EAS fora newterm. In response to our request, five aircarriers submitted proposals:
• Aerodynamics, Inc. submitted a proposal to serve Laurel/Hattiesburg, Meridian, and Tupelo. • Air Choice One submitted a proposal to serve Muscle Shoals, Greenville, and Tupelo. • ExpressJet submitted a proposal to serve Laurel/Hattiesburg and Meridian. • SeaPort Airlines submitted a proposal to serve Muscle Shoals, Greenville, and Tupelo. • SunAir submitted a proposal to serve Muscle Shoals, Greenville, Laurel/Hattiesburg, and Tupelo. I have attached each air carrier's proposal foryour review and I expectthem to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometimethis afternoon. I requestthatyou reviewthe proposals and submit any commentsyou may have as soon as possible, but no laterthan Wednesday, July 9. Please send yourcomments directlyto me via e-mail at michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. Ifyou have any questions, feel free to contact me. Regards,
Michael Martin United States Department ofTransportation Essential AirService (EAS) and Small CommunityAirService Development Program (SCASDP) 1
No. 07-125 October 2, 2007

NRC PROPOSES IMPROVEMENTS TO REACTOR VESSEL REQUIREMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing improvements to its rules regarding 

how pressurized water reactors (PWR) account for some effects of aging on their reactor vessels. 

The proposal would increase the realism of calculations used to examine a PWR=s 

susceptibility to a phenomenon known as pressurized thermal shock (PTS). PTS can occur under 

some scenarios that rapidly cool the reactor vessel while the vessel is pressurized. This would 

subject the steel to large thermal stresses, which could lead to cracking and even failure of the 

vessel. The other type of U.S. nuclear power plants, boiling water reactors, is not susceptible to 

PTS. 

The proposed rule would allow PWR operators to voluntarily adopt a more realistic 

technical approach for determining the probability of vessel failure during a PTS event. This 

revised approach was derived using data from research on three currently operating PWRs that 

indicate the overall risk of PTS-induced vessel failure after 60 years of reactor operation is much 

lower than previously estimated. The proposed rule would also require PWR operators to 

perform detailed analysis on the results of regular reactor vessel inspections. 

The proposed rule will be available on the NRC=s Web site by entering ML070570283 at 

this address: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm. Public comments on the proposed rule 

should be submitted within 75 days of the rule=s publication, expected shortly, in the Federal 

Register. Comments received after that point will be considered if it is practical to do so. The 

comments should be addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may 

also be faxed to the Secretary at 301-415-1101 or by e-mail to SECY@nrc.gov. Comments may 

also be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Please 

include the number RIN 3150-AI01 in the subject line of the comments. 

For more information on the rule, contact NRC staff members George Tartal (telephone 

301-415-0016, e-mail gmt1@nrc.gov) or Barry Elliot (telephone 301-415-2709, e-mail 

bje@nrc.gov). 

### 

 News releases are available through a free listserv subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 

E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Site: http://www.nrc.gov
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-043 July 27, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC PROPOSES $65,000 FINE FOR VIOLATION AT SEABROOK STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed to fine FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, $65,000

for a violation related to security requirements at Seabrook Station in Seabrook, N.H. The issues were

corrected immediately and the plant remains secure. 

In Spring 2005, the NRC dispatched a special inspection team to Seabrook after a routine

security inspection found issues at the site in May. This enforcement action stems from those

inspections and additional NRC follow-up. Immediately upon identification of the issues, FPL took

actions to address them. NRC inspectors have reviewed the company’s corrective actions and found

them to be in compliance with NRC security requirements.

The NRC has cited the company for the failure to maintain complete and accurate records of

test results and proposed a $65,000 fine. A second violation that occurred, in part due to inadequate

management oversight, has been characterized by the NRC’s Reactor Oversight Process as low-tomoderate security significance. There was no additional fine associated with this violation. 

NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins said, “The action was necessary to emphasize

the importance of oversight and corporate support of the installation and testing of equipment, as well

as maintaining complete and accurate records of such testing.”

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the civil penalty

or to protest it, in whole or in part.

The NRC routinely conducts inspections of security at the nation’s nuclear power plants. The

details of those inspections are not publicly available because certain security information could be

useful to an adversary.

###
#### In the Matter of Solomon Brenner, Appellant, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator of the Temporary State Housing Rent Commission, et al., Respondents.

Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 920.]
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO COMBAT CHILD EXPLOITATION
### Part B—Police Pattern or Practice
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1918

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend commissary and exchange 

store privileges to veterans with a service-connected disability rated at 

30 percent or more and to the dependents of such veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend commissary 

and exchange store privileges to veterans with a serviceconnected disability rated at 30 percent or more and 

to the dependents of such veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVI4 LEGES FOR DISABLED VETERANS. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF PRIVILEGES.—Chapter 54 of title 

6 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new section:
2

•HR 1918 IH 

1 ‘‘§ 1066. Use of commissary and exchange stores: dis2 abled veterans and dependents 

3 ‘‘(a) DISABLED VETERANS.—A veteran with a serv4 ice-connected disability rated at 30 percent or more shall 

5 be permitted to use commissary and exchange stores on 

6 the same basis as a member of the armed forces entitled 

7 to retired pay. 

8 ‘‘(b) DEPENDENTS.—A dependent of a veteran who 

9 is permitted under subsection (a) to use commissary and 

10 exchange stores shall be permitted to use such stores on 

11 the same basis as a dependent of a member of the armed 

12 forces entitled to retired pay. 

13 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘vet14 eran’ and ‘service-connected’ have the meanings given 

15 those terms in section 101 of title 38.’’.

16 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections 

17 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

18 at the end the following new item:

‘‘1066. Use of commissary and exchange stores: disabled veterans and dependents.’’.

Æ
#### § 532.105 Pay-fixing authority.

The head of each agency shall authorize application of the rates established by the lead agency or the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to prevailing rate employees within the appropriate wage area, in accordance with the provisions of this part.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-100 August 4, 2006

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF 

LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-year renewal

of the operating license for the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant is available for public review.

The FitzPatrick plant is located approximately eight miles northeast of Oswego, N.Y., and its

current operating license expires Oct. 17, 2014. The applicant, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,

submitted the renewal application Aug 1. The application is available on the NRC Web site at this

address: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html . 

The NRC staff is currently conducting its initial reviews of the application to determine

whether it contains enough information for the required formal reviews. If the application has sufficient

information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file it and will announce an opportunity for the public

to request an adjudicatory hearing on the renewal request.

Additional information about the NRC’s review of reactor license renewal applications is

available on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

###
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# Palisades, Submittal of 2006 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Waste Disposal Report.

Accession Number: ML071290349

Date Released: Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML071290351 - Palisades, Submittal of 2006 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release and Waste Disposal Report. (33 page(s), 4/26/2007)
    - ML071290353 - Palisades, Rev. 20 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. (170 page(s), 7/6/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### In the Matter of Clifford Johnston, Appellant, against Clifford J. Fletcher, as *Commissioner*of *Motor*Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — • Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant the petition.
§ 4001.102 Definitions. For purposes of this part: ( a ) *Covered employee* means: ( 1 ) All examiners who perform work for the Corporation; and
( 2 ) Any other employee specified by Corporation directive whose duties and responsibilities require application of these supplemental regulations to ensure public confidence that the Corporation's programs are conducted impartially and objectively. The Corporation Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) or his or her designee, in consultation with the Chief Operating Officer, will determine which employees are covered for the purpose of this part.
( b ) *Related entity* means: ( 1 ) Affiliates defined in section 8.5(e) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended (Act), 12 U.S.C. 2001 *et seq.,* 12 U.S.C. 2279aa-5;
( 2 ) Affiliates defined in section 8.11(e) of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 2279aa-11;
( 3 ) Service organizations authorized by section 4.25 of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 2211; and
( 4 ) Any other entity owned or controlled by one or more Farm Credit System (System) institution that is not chartered by the Farm Credit Administration (FCA).
( c ) *System institution* refers to: ( 1 ) All institutions chartered and regulated by the FCA as described in section 1.2 of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 2002;
( 2 ) The Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation, established pursuant to section 4.9 of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 2160; and
( 3 ) The Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, established pursuant to section 8.1 of the Act, 12 U.S.C. 2279aa-1.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2515

In Re: GABRIEL NEAL, a/k/a Doty, a/k/a Rodney, a/k/a 

Rondey,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(3:08-cr-00259-RJC-DCK-9; 3:12-cv-00253-MR)

Submitted: February 28, 2014 Decided: April 17, 2014

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gabriel Neal, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gabriel Neal petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court 

directing the district court to act. Our review of the district 

court’s docket reveals that the district court entered an order 

granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent on January 16, 

2014. Accordingly, because the district court has recently 

decided Neal’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We 

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
### §§467k to 467m. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3685

Section 467k, Pub. L. 92–367, §12, as added Pub. L. 99–662, title XII, §1201(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4262; amended Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 102–580, title II, §209(c), Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4830, related to development of improved dam inspection techniques.

Section 467l, Pub. L. 92–367, §13, as added Pub. L. 99–662, title XII, §1201(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4262; amended Pub. L. 102–580, title II, §209(d), Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4830, related to dam inventory updates.

Section 467m, Pub. L. 92–367, §14, as added Pub. L. 99–662, title XII, §1201(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4263, provided that inspection funds were not to be used for repair or construction of any dam.
Exhibit 31.2

TVIA, INC.

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Period Ended March 31, 2004

I, Arthur Nguyen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K
of Tvia, Inc.;




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4. The registrants other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:




a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: June 21, 2004


|By: |  | /s/ Arthur
Nguyen Arthur Nguyen Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1920

To require that contracts entered into by the Federal Government for reconstruction in Iraq include a condition that the contractor, when hiring 

employees to carry out the contract, provide a preference for the hiring 

of veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2003

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To require that contracts entered into by the Federal Government for reconstruction in Iraq include a condition 

that the contractor, when hiring employees to carry out 

the contract, provide a preference for the hiring of veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Let U.S. Veterans Re5 build Iraq Act’’. 
2

•HR 1920 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR VETERANS HIRING PREF2 ERENCE FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS PER3 FORMING CONTRACTS FOR RECONSTRUC4 TION IN IRAQ. 

5 (a) VETERANS PREFERENCE.—As a condition of any 

6 contract, or any subcontract at any tier under a contract, 

7 entered into by the Federal Government with a private 

8 sector contractor to perform reconstruction in Iraq, the 

9 Federal Government shall require the contractor (and any 

10 subcontractor at any tier hired by the contractor), when 

11 hiring employees who will perform work under the con12 tract (or subcontract), to extend to preference eligible vet13 erans a hiring preference equivalent to the preference ex14 tended to preference eligible veterans for civilian employee 

15 positions in the Federal Government. 

16 (b) PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE VETERAN DEFINED.—

17 In this section, the term ‘‘preference eligible veteran’’ has 

18 the meaning given the term ‘‘preference eligible’’ in section 

19 2108 of title 5.

Æ
### **CHAPTER 503—LAW ENFORCEMENT CONGRESSIONAL BADGE OF BRAVERY**

Sec.
50301.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT CONGRESSIONAL BADGE OF BRAVERY

50311.
Authorization of a Badge.
50312.
Nominations.
50313.
Federal Law Enforcement Congressional Badge of Bravery Board.
50314.
Presentation of Federal Law Enforcement Badges.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT CONGRESSIONAL BADGE OF BRAVERY

50321.
Authorization of a Badge.
50322.
Nominations.
50323.
State and Local Law Enforcement Congressional Badge of Bravery Board.
50324.
Presentation of State and Local Law Enforcement Badges.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—CONGRESSIONAL BADGE OF BRAVERY OFFICE

50331.
Congressional Badge of Bravery Office.
### §3803. Administration and enforcement

#### (a) In general

Unless otherwise specified in this chapter, with respect to a vessel, the Secretary shall administer and enforce the Convention and this chapter.

#### (b) Administrator

Except with respect to section 3841(b) and (c) of this title, the Administrator shall administer and enforce subchapter III.

#### (c) Regulations

The Administrator and the Secretary may each prescribe and enforce regulations as may be necessary to carry out their respective responsibilities under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1013, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3025.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this title", meaning title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3023, which enacted this chapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title X to the Code, see Tables.