alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1823 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1823

To prohibit United States assistance for the Palestinian Authority and 
   for programs, projects, and activities in the West Bank and Gaza.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2003

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit United States assistance for the Palestinian Authority and 
   for programs, projects, and activities in the West Bank and Gaza.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES ASSISTANCE FOR THE PALESTINIAN 
              AUTHORITY AND THE WEST BANK AND GAZA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, United States 
assistance may not be provided directly or indirectly to the 
Palestinian Authority (or to any successor or related entity) or for 
programs, projects, and activities in the West Bank or Gaza unless the 
President determines and certifies to the Committee on International 
Relations of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign 
Relations of the Senate that--
            (1) the leadership of the Palestinian Authority--
                    (A) has publicly renounced violence as a means of 
                political expression; and
                    (B) has taken all actions within its capacity to 
                bring an end to the violence which commenced in early 
                October 2000 in the West Bank and Gaza; and
            (2) the violence in the West Bank and Gaza has subsided.
                                 <all>
```
### §20987. Grants for online child safety programs

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall, subject to the availability of appropriations, make grants to States, units of local government, and nonprofit organizations for the purposes of establishing and maintaining programs with respect to improving and educating children and parents in the best ways for children to be safe when on the Internet.

#### (b) Definition of State

For purposes of this section, the term "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section such sums as are necessary for fiscal years 2007 through 2011.

(Pub. L. 109–248, title VI, §630, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 640.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 16987 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
SEP 2 5 1997

Dr. Carl J. Paperiello, Director

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Paperiello:

SUBJECT: Existing Aluminum Spent Nuclear Fuel Performance Database Documents For Your

Review and Comments (As Per Interagency Agreement DE-A109-96SR18579 and

Memorandum of Understanding)

Per Interagency Agreement DE-A109-96SR18579 and Memorandum of Understanding,

Savannah River Operations Office is submitting to you five copies of the Existing Aluminum

Spent Nuclear Fuel Performance Database Documents for your review and comments as

described in the presentation held on October 31, 1996.

These documents characterize the basic research on aluminum based spent nuclear fuel for a

period of 50 years and will be used as the basis for all future extrapolations for the behavior of

the fuel for longer periods of time.

Your review/comments and indication of "no objections" within 60 days will be greatly

appreciated.

Any contracting questions should be addressed to Beth O'Rear at (803) 725-1345. For all other

questions, please contact me or Jean M. Ridley, P.E. of my staff at (803) 557-3758.

Sincerely,

A. Lee Watkins

Assistant Manager for Material

RSFD:JMR:ddc and Facility Stabilization

UE-97-0094

11 Enclosures (See Page 2)
Dr. Paperiello

2 CEP 2? IV!

1 I Enclosures

1. Material Issues in Interim

Storage and Direct Disposal of

Clad Spent Nuclear Fuel

2. Creep Analysis for Materials

Test Reactor (MTR) Fuel

Assemblies in Dry Storage

3. Evaluation of Corrosion of

Aluminum-Based Reactor Fuel

Cladding Materials During Dry

Storage

4. Acceptance Criteria for Interim

Dry Storage Aluminum Alloy

Clad Spent Nuclear Fuels

5. Plan for Development of

Technologies for Direct Disposal

of Aluminum Spent Nuclear Fuel

6. Task Plan for Development of

Dilution Technologies for

Aluminum-Base Spent Nuclear

Fuel

7. Task Plan for Characterization of

DOE Aluminum Spent Nuclear

Fuel

8. Task Plan for Engineering Test

Protocol for Metallic Alloys

Waste Forms

9. Vapor Corrosion of Aluminum

Cladding Alloys and

Aluminum-Uranium Fuel

Materials in Storage Environments

10. Alternative Aluminum Spent

Nuclear Fuel Treatment

Technology Development Status

Report

11. Evaluation of Codisposal

Viability for Aluminum-Clad

DOE-Owned Spent Fuel: Phase

I, Intact Codisposal Canister
Dr. Paperiello

3 SEP 2 s 19?

cc w/encl:

M. J. Bell, OCRWM

C. Hansen (EM-67), HQ

bcc w/o end:

D. L. Campbell, DOE-SR

S. E. O'Rear, DOE-SR

Mark Barlow, WSRC

Richard Murphy, WSRC

M. D. Federline, NRC

K. Chacey, EM-67

W. D. Clark, DOE-SR

Rick Weller, NRC

N. King Stablein, NRC

RSFD Rdg File

MGR Rdg. File

AMMFS Rdg. File
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1818

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand workplace health 

incentives by equalizing the tax consequences of employee athletic facility 

use. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

workplace health incentives by equalizing the tax consequences of employee athletic facility use.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workforce Health Im5 provement Program Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYER-PROVIDED OFF-PREMISES HEALTH 

7 CLUB SERVICES. 

8 (a) TREATMENT AS FRINGE BENEFIT.—Subpara9 graph (A) of section 132(j)(4) of the Internal Revenue 
2

•HR 1818 IH 

1 Code of 1986 (relating to on-premises gyms and other ath2 letic facilities) is amended to read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall 

4 not include—

5 ‘‘(i) the value of any on-premises ath6 letic facility provided by an employer to his 

7 employees, and 

8 ‘‘(ii) fees or membership expenses 

9 paid by an employer to an athletic or fit10 ness facility described in subparagraph (C) 

11 on behalf of its employees.’’. 

12 (b) ATHLETIC FACILITIES DESCRIBED.—Paragraph 

13 (4) of section 132(j) of such Code is amended by adding 

14 at the end the following new subparagraph: 

15 ‘‘(C) CERTAIN ATHLETIC OR FITNESS FA16 CILITIES DESCRIBED.—For purposes of sub17 paragraph (A)(ii), an athletic or fitness facility 

18 described in this subparagraph is a facility—

19 ‘‘(i) providing instruction in a pro20 gram of physical exercise or offering facili21 ties for the preservation, maintenance, en22 couragement, or development of physical 

23 fitness, 

24 ‘‘(ii) which is not a private club owned 

25 and operated by its members, 
3

•HR 1818 IH 

1 ‘‘(iii) which does not offer golf, hunt2 ing, sailing, or riding facilities, 

3 ‘‘(iv) whose health or fitness facility is 

4 not incidental to its overall function and 

5 purpose, and 

6 ‘‘(v) which is fully compliant with the 

7 State of jurisdiction and Federal anti-dis8 criminations laws.’’. 

9 (c) EMPLOYER DEDUCTION FOR DUES TO CERTAIN

10 ATHLETIC FACILITIES.—

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 

12 274(a) of such Code (relating to denial of deduction 

13 for club dues) is amended by adding at the end the 

14 following new sentence: ‘‘The preceding sentence 

15 shall not apply to fees or dues paid to athletic or fit16 ness facilities (within the meaning of section 

17 132(j)(4)(C)).’’. 

18 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

19 274(e)(4) of such Code is amended by inserting be20 fore the period at the end of the last sentence the 

21 following: ‘‘(other than fees or dues paid to athletic 

22 or fitness facilities (within the meaning of section 

23 132(j)(4)(C)))’’. 
4

•HR 1818 IH 

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 1400.205 Savings provision.

No provision of the rule in this part may be applied to make an adverse inference in pending administrative proceedings. However, the redesignation of a position may require that the occupant of that position undergo a new adjudication. An administrative proceeding is deemed to be pending from the date of the agency or OPM notice described in § 1400.301(c)(1).
#### John O. Hewitt, Appellant, v. Noel Coward et al., Individually and as Copartners under the Name of Transatlantic Productions Company, et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [180 Misc. 1065.]
### §702d. Flowage rights; condemnation proceedings; benefits to property

The United States shall provide flowage rights for additional destructive flood waters that will pass by reason of diversions from the main channel of the Mississippi River: Provided, That in all cases where the execution of the flood control plan herein adopted results in benefits to property such benefits shall be taken into consideration by way of reducing the amount of compensation to be paid.

The Secretary of the Army may cause proceedings to be instituted for the acquirement by condemnation of any lands, easements, or rights of way which, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers, are needed in carrying out this project, the said proceedings to be instituted in the United States district court for the district in which the land, easement, or right of way is located. In all such proceedings the practice, pleadings, forms, and modes of proceedings shall conform as near as may be to the practice, pleadings, forms, and proceedings existing at the time in like causes in the courts of record of the State within which such district court is held, any rule of the court to the contrary notwithstanding. When the owner of any land, easement, or right of way shall fix a price for the same which, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army is reasonable, he may purchase the same at such price; and the Secretary of the Army is also authorized to accept donations of lands, easements, and rights of way required for this project. The provisions of sections 594 and 595 of this title are made applicable to the acquisition of lands, easements, or rights of way needed for works of flood control: Provided, That any land acquired under the provisions of this section shall be turned over without cost to the ownership of States or local interests.

(May 15, 1928, ch. 569, §4, 45 Stat. 536; Nov. 30, 1945, ch. 496, 59 Stat. 587; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1945—Act Nov. 30, 1945, substituted second sentence of second par. for a sentence which read "In all such proceedings the court, for the purpose of ascertaining the value of the property and assessing the compensation to be paid, shall appoint three commissioners, whose award, when confirmed by the court, shall be final."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
§ 330.205 Agency RPL applications. Agencies may develop their own application format which must, at a minimum: ( a ) Allow an RPL eligible to register for positions at the same representative rate and work schedule (full-time, part-time, seasonal, or intermittent) as the position from which the RPL eligible was, or will be, separated; and
( b ) Allow an RPL eligible to specify the conditions under which he or she will accept a position, including grades or pay levels, appointment type (permanent or time-limited), occupations (e.g., position classification series or career groups), and minimum number of hours of work per week, as applicable.
### **CHAPTER 215—ADVANCED NOTIFICATION OF TRAVELING SEX OFFENDERS**

Sec.
21501.
Findings.
21502.
Definitions.
21503.
Angel Watch Center.
21504.
Notification by the United States Marshals Service.
21505.
Implementation.
21506.
Reciprocal notifications.
21507.
Implementation plan.
21508.
Technical assistance.
21509.
Authorization of appropriations.
21510.
Rule of construction.
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

The Board of Directors and
Shareholders

Camtek Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-84476, 333-60704,
333-49982 and 333-113139) of Camtek Ltd. Of our report dated March 12, 2006, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Camtek Ltd. as of December 31, 2005 and
for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on
form 20-F of Camtek Ltd., filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.

|/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co. 
A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants | /s/ Goldstein Sabo Tevet
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tel Aviv, Israel June 30,
2008



---

---
EXHIBIT 4.14

NanoSignal Corp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 560
Las Vegas, NV 89109

                                                               February 17, 2004


Re:      S-8 Payment under terms of Written
         Contract - Director and President

Dear Dr. Perrin:

This shall  confirm our  agreement to issue to you S-8 shares under the terms of
your written employment  contract with the Company for all accrued  compensation
due you through this date for 2003 services..

The compensation due is equivalent to FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND (400,000) shares
of common stock to be issued to


                                Dr. Rupert Perrin

Please confirm your  acceptance of these terms below as indicated.  Your telefax
copy  should  be sent to us with  the  original  signed  copy  delivered  to our
corporate offices at your earliest convenience.


Very truly yours,

ANNALIE GALICIA

By: /s/ Annalie Galacia
    Annalie Galicia, Secretary-Treasurer

AG:jd


Accepted and Agreed to

DR. RUPERT PERRIN

By: /s/ Dr. Rupert Perrin                  Dated: February 17,  2004
    Dr. Rupert Perrin
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Paul F. Walsh, the Chief Executive Officer, of eFunds
Corporation (the Company), and Thomas S. Liston, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that, to
the best of their knowledge: (i) the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of the Company
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: March 15, 2004
    
    /s/ Paul F. WalshPaul F. WalshChief Executive Officer/s/ Thomas S. ListonThomas S. ListonChief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0014 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JACK WARREN MAXVILL, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 31, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 15 2021

12/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0014
§ 1830.10 Conditions of release. OSC shall not release any record that is contained in a system of records to any individual or to another agency, except as follows: ( a ) *Consent to release by the subject individual.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section authorizing releases of records without consent, no release of a record will be made without the consent of the subject individual. The consent shall be in writing and signed by the subject individual. The consent shall specify the individual, agency, or other entity to whom the record may be released, which record may be released and, where applicable, during which time frame the record may be released. The subject individual's identity and, where applicable, the identity of the individual to whom the record is to be released shall be verified as set forth in § 1830.3(c).
( b ) *Releases without the consent of the subject individual.* The releases listed in this paragraph may be made without the consent of the subject individual, including: ( 1 ) To employees and contractors of the Office of Special Counsel who have a need for the record to perform their duties.
( 2 ) As required by the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and part 1820 of this chapter.
( 3 ) To the entities listed in in the Privacy Act at 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(1) through (12).
### §664. General duties as to plans for protection of navigation

It shall be the duty of said commission to mature and adopt such plan or plans, from examinations and surveys made prior to March 1, 1893, and from such additional examinations and surveys as it may deem necessary, as will improve the navigability of all the rivers comprising said systems, deepen their channels, and protect their banks. Such plan or plans shall be matured with a view of making the same effective as against the encroachment of and damage from debris resulting from mining operations, natural erosion, or other causes, with a view of restoring, as near as practicable and the necessities of commerce and navigation demand, the navigability of said rivers to the condition existing in 1860, and permitting mining by the hydraulic process, as the term is understood in said State, to be carried on, provided the same can be accomplished, without injury to the navigability of said rivers or the lands adjacent thereto.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §4, 27 Stat. 507.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

California Debris Commission abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Army by Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1106, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4229, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Brown Lab Investments, LLC, Joel Katz and Andrea Katz v. Lane Moesser

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0837

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 35154

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Appellants, Brown Lab Investments, LLC, Joel Katz and Andrea Katz have filed a
“Motion of Non

- Resident Attorneys, Hal J. Wood and Richard Z. Wolf, For Admission
Pro Hac Vice.”

Pursuant to Rule XIX of the Rules Gover ning Admission to the Bar of Texas, if a

non

- resident attorney seeks to participate in proceedings in Texas, “the non

- resident attorney shall file with the applicable Texas court a written, sworn motion requesting permission to participate in a particular cause.” The motion filed by appellants was not sworn. Moreover, the motion lacks a certificate of service and a certificate of conference.

See T EX

. R. A

PP . P. 9.5, 10.1(a)(5).

Accordingly, we DENY appellant ’ s motion. Nevertheless, we will consider an y sworn motions for admission that comply with Rule XIX and the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 4 , 2018
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 29, 2011

Order 

September 29, 2011

142566(92)

142568

SC: 142566, 142568

COA: 297446, 297446

In re MAYS, Minors. Wayne CC Family Division:

_________________________________ 09-485821

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan for leave to participate in oral argument is granted to the extent 

that the Association may use five minutes of the time allocated to the Attorney General as 

counsel for the Department of Human Services.
Order filed October 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-13-00539-CR

____________

ROBERT NELSON LAUDERDALE, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1382005

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s exhibit 27.

The clerk of the 337th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this

court the original of State’s exhibit 27, on or before October 16, 2014. The Clerk 

of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to 

deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of 

inspection, to return the original of State’s exhibit 27, to the clerk of the 337th 

District Court.

PER CURIAM
#### § 1312.23 Access to classified information.

Classified information may be made available to a person only when the possessor of the information establishes that the person has a valid “need to know” and the access is essential to the accomplishment of official government duties. The proposed recipient is eligible to receive classified information only after he/she has been granted a security clearance by the EOP Security Officer. Cover sheets will be used to protect classified documents from inadvertent disclosure while in use. An SF-703 will be used for Top Secret material; an SF-704 for Secret material, and an SF-705 for Confidential material. The cover sheet should be removed prior to placing the document in the files.