alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1581

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 

gross income for certain compensation received by members of the Armed 

Forces serving in South Korea. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. KNOLLENBERG (for himself, Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Mr. EDWARDS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exclusion from gross income for certain compensation 

received by members of the Armed Forces serving in 

South Korea.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Forces 

5 Korea Quality of Life Act’’. 
2

•HR 1581 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN COMPENSATION RE2 CEIVED BY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES SERVING IN SOUTH KOREA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 112 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to certain combat zone com6 pensation of members of the Armed Forces) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(e) COMPENSATION FOR SERVICE IN SOUTH

9 KOREA.—Gross income does not include so much of the 

10 compensation as does not exceed the maximum enlisted 

11 amount received for active service as a member of the 

12 Armed Forces of the United States for any month if such 

13 member served in South Korea for substantially all of such 

14 month.’’. 

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—

16 (1) The heading for section 112 of such Code 

17 is amended to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘SEC. 112. CERTAIN COMPENSATION OF MEMBERS OF THE 

19 ARMED FORCES.’’. 

20 (2) The item relating to section 112 in the table 

21 of sections for part III of subchapter B of chapter 

22 1 of such Code is amended to read as follows:

‘‘Sec. 112. Certain compensation of members of the Armed 

Forces.’’.
3

•HR 1581 IH 

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2002.

Æ
472 P.2d 985

#### The STATE of Utah and Barbara J. Tuft ex rel. Jeri Dee TUFT, Neil Rodger Tuft and Jody Louise Tuft, minor childen of Barbara J. and Sherrill D. Tuft, Petitioners, v. Sherrill D. TUFT, Respondent.

No. 9102.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Aug. 10, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied.
§ 210.30 Requests for production of documents and things and entry upon land. ( a ) *Scope.* Any party may serve on any other party a request: ( 1 ) To produce and permit the party making the request, or someone acting on his behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained), or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things that are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served; or
( 2 ) To permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspecting and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of § 210.27(b).
( b ) *Procedure.* ( 1 ) The request may be served upon any party after the date of publication in the Federal Register of the notice of investigation. The request shall set forth the items to be inspected, either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable particularity. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.
( 2 ) The party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response within 10 days or the time specified by the administrative law judge. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which event the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of any item or category, the part shall be specified. The party submitting the request may move for an order under § 210.33(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to respond to the request or any part thereof, or any failure to permit inspection as requested. A party who produces documents for inspection shall produce them as they are kept in the usual course of business or shall organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the request.
( c ) *Persons not parties.* This section does not preclude issuance of an order against a person not a party to permit entry upon land.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 38323, July 7, 2008]
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201500413

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

WILLIAM G. MAC

Operations Specialist Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Paul C. LeBlanc, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS PINCKNEY

(DDG 91).

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Commander

Christopher P. Toscano, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Daniel R. Douglas, USMC.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Commander Catheryne E. Pully, JAGC, 

USN; Lieutenant Jetti L. Gibson, JAGC, USN.

_________________________

Decided 16 February 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, GLASER-ALLEN, and JONES, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but may be 

cited as persuasive authority under NMCCA Rule of Practice and 

Procedure 18.2.

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted the appellant, 

pursuant to his pleas, of one specification of wrongful use of marijuana and 

one specification of assault consummated by a battery in violation of Articles 

112a and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a and 928. 
United States v. Mac, No. 201500413

2

The military judge sentenced the appellant to eight months’ confinement, 

forfeiture of $1,144.00 pay per month for eight months, reduction to pay 

grade E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved 

the adjudged sentence.

The appellant avers, and the government concedes, that the adjudged and 

approved forfeitures of pay exceed the maximum allowed by law at this 

special court-martial. The military judge calculated the adjudged forfeiture 

amount by mistakenly including the $100 sea pay the appellant received at 

the time of trial. “The maximum authorized amount of a partial forfeiture 

shall be determined by using the basic pay . . . and, if no confinement is 

adjudged, any sea or hardship duty pay.” RULE FOR COURTS-MARTIAL 

1003(b)(2), MANUAL FOR COURTS-MARTIAL, UNITED STATES (2012 ed.) 

(emphasis added). As the adjudged sentence here included confinement, the

military judge should not have included sea pay when calculating maximum 

forfeitures—two-thirds of basic pay, in whole dollars, at the appellant’s 

reduced rank, or $1,031.00 pay per month.

After taking corrective action, we conclude that the findings and sentence 

are correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to the 

substantial rights of the appellant remains. Arts. 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ. 

The findings and only so much of the sentence as provides for confinement 

for eight months, reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $1,031.00 pay per 

month for eight months, and a bad-conduct discharge are affirmed. 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Beckstead and Watts, LLP
Certified Public Accountant
                                                       3340 Wynn Road Suite C
                                                          Las Vegas, NV 89102
                                                                 702.257.1984
                                                             702.362.0540 fax





March 27, 2003


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Beckstead and Watts, LLP, consents to the inclusion of our report
of  March  27,  2003,  on  the Financial Statements  of  Too  Late  Financial
Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, in its Form  10K-
SB filing to be filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Signed,


/s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP


Beckstead and Watts, LLP
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1468

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the depreciation 

of natural gas pipelines, equipment, and infrastructure assets to be 

10-year property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2003

Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the depreciation of natural gas pipelines, equipment, and 

infrastructure assets to be 10-year property.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. RECOVERY PERIOD FOR NATURAL GAS DIS4 TRIBUTION, STORAGE AND TRANSMISSION 

5 INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS. 

6 (a) 10-YEAR RECOVERY PERIOD.—Subparagraph 

7 (D) of section 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 (relating to the classification of certain property) is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (i), by 
2

•HR 1468 IH 

1 striking the period at the end of clause (ii) and inserting 

2 ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

3 clause: 

4 ‘‘(iii) natural gas distribution, storage 

5 and transmission infrastructure assets.’’. 

6 (b) NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION, STORAGE, AND

7 TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS.—Subsection 

8 (i) of section 168 of such Code is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following new paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(15) NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION, STORAGE, 

11 AND TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS.—

12 The term ‘natural gas distribution, storage, and 

13 transmission infrastructure assets’ means the pipe, 

14 storage facilities, delivery facilities, equipment, and 

15 appurtenances used to deliver or store natural gas 

16 from the wellhead to the point of consumption.’’

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to property placed in service on 

19 or after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 351.205 Authority of OPM.

The Office of Personnel Management may establish further guidance and instructions for the planning, preparation, conduct, and review of reductions in force. OPM may examine an agency's preparations for reduction in force at any stage. When OPM finds that an agency's preparations are contrary to the express provisions or to the spirit and intent of these regulations or that they would result in violation of employee rights or equities, OPM may require appropriate corrective action.

[51 FR 319, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 66 FR 66710, Dec. 27, 2001]
### §853o. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §271(1), Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3094

Section, acts June 3, 1948, ch. 390, §16, 62 Stat. 299; Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 681, title V, §531(b)(41), 63 Stat. 840; Pub. L. 85–422, §11(c), May 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 132; Pub. L. 87–649, §9(b)(2), Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 495; Pub. L. 96–342, title VIII, §813(g), Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1110; Pub. L. 98–94, title IX, §§922(c), 923(e), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 642, 643; Pub. L. 99–348, title II, §206, July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 701, related to computation of retirement pay. See section 3045 of this title.
#### § 1830.7 Exemptions.

OSC exempts investigatory material from records subject to Privacy Act record requests or requests to amend records. This exemption aims to prevent interference with OSC's inquiries into matters under its jurisdiction, and to protect identities of confidential sources of information. OSC also reserves the right to assert exemptions for records received from another agency that could be properly claimed by that agency. OSC may exempt any information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a legal action or proceeding.
### §10533. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "armor vest" means—

(A) body armor, no less than Type I, which has been tested through the voluntary compliance testing program operated by the National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center of the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), and found to meet or exceed the requirements of NIJ Standard 0101.03, or any subsequent revision of such standard; or

(B) body armor that has been tested through the voluntary compliance testing program, and found to meet or exceed the requirements of NIJ Standard 0115.00, or any revision of such standard;

(2) the term "body armor" means any product sold or offered for sale as personal protective body covering intended to protect against gunfire, stabbing, or other physical harm;

(3) the term "State" means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands;

(4) the term "unit of local government" means a county, municipality, town, township, village, parish, borough, or other unit of general government below the State level;

(5) the term "Indian tribe" has the same meaning as in section 5304(e) of title 25; and

(6) the term "law enforcement officer" means any officer, agent, or employee of a State, unit of local government, or Indian tribe authorized by law or by a government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, or investigation of any violation of criminal law, or authorized by law to supervise sentenced criminal offenders.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2503, as added Pub. L. 105–181, §3(a)(3), June 16, 1998, 112 Stat. 514; amended Pub. L. 106–517, §3(d), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ll–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2000—Par. (1). Pub. L. 106–517 designated provisions after " 'armor vest' means" as subpar. (A) and added subpar. (B).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Interim Definition of Armor Vest

Pub. L. 106–517, §3(e), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2408, provided that: "For purposes of part Y of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 [34 U.S.C. 10531 et seq.], as amended by this Act, the meaning of the term 'armor vest' (as defined in section 2503 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 3796ll–2) [now 34 U.S.C. 10533]) shall, until the date on which a final NIJ Standard 0115.00 is first fully approved and implemented, also include body armor which has been found to meet or exceed the requirements for protection against stabbing established by the State in which the grantee is located."
June 2, 2006

Ms. Patricia A. Rivers

Chief, Environmental Community of Practice

Directorate of Military Programs

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

441 G Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20314-1000

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF NRC PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR 

NRC-USACE FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

(FUSRAP) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) 

Dear Ms. Rivers:

As called for by Article II - Interagency Communication of the subject MOU (66 FR 36606), this

letter is to inform you that Mr. Keith McConnell, Deputy Director, Division of Waste

Management and Environmental Protection, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will be the

NRC Principal Representative for the NRC-USACE FUSRAP MOU. Mr. McConnell can be

reached at (301) 415-7474. 

I remain NRC point of contact for the MOU, and can be reached at (301) 415-0023. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/

Amir Kouhestani

Project Manager

Decommissioning Directorate

Division of Waste Management

 and Environmental Protection

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

 and Safeguards

cc: Keith McConnell, NRC

 Francis Cameron, NRC

 John MacEvoy, USACE

 Tomiann McDaniel, USACE

 Kathleen Owens, Stepan Company

 Pat Duft, Mallinckrodt, Inc.

 John Conant, ABB Prospect

 Terry Chalker, BWXT

 
June 2, 2006

Ms. Patricia A. Rivers

Chief, Environmental Community of Practice

Directorate of Military Programs

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

441 G Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20314-1000

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF NRC PRINCIPAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR 

NRC-USACE FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

(FUSRAP) MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) 

Dear Ms. Rivers:

As called for by Article II - Interagency Communication of the subject MOU (66 FR 36606), this

letter is to inform you that Mr. Keith McConnell, Deputy Director, Division of Waste

Management and Environmental Protection, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, will be the

NRC Principal Representative for the NRC-USACE FUSRAP MOU. Mr. McConnell can be

reached at (301) 415-7474. 

I remain NRC point of contact for the MOU, and can be reached at (301) 415-0023. 

Sincerely, 

/RA/

Amir Kouhestani

Project Manager

Decommissioning Directorate

Division of Waste Management

 and Environmental Protection

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

 and Safeguards

cc: Keith McConnell, NRC

 Francis Cameron, NRC

 John MacEvoy, USACE

 Tomiann McDaniel, USACE

 Kathleen Owens, Stepan Company

 Pat Duft, Mallinckrodt, Inc.

 John Conant, ABB Prospect

 Terry Chalker, BWXT

DISTRIBUTION: PDR DWMEP r/f NMSS r/f MMiller, RI

ML061530008

OFC DWMEP: PM DWMEP: LA DWMEP:SC DWMEP:DD

NAME AKouhestani CWalls ASnyder DGillen

DATE 5/31/06 06/02/06 06/02/06 06/02/06 

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Exhibit 4.31


 


ABBOTT
LABORATORIES


 


OFFICERS’
CERTIFICATE


 


and


 


COMPANY
ORDER


 


February 5, 2004


 


With respect to the
issuance by Abbott Laboratories (the “Company”) of $500,000,000 in aggregate
principal amount of 3.5% Notes due 2009 (the “Notes”), Jose M. de Lasa and
Terrence C. Kearney, officers of the Company, certify pursuant to Sections 3.1
and 3.3 of the Indenture, dated as of February 9, 2001 (the “Indenture”),
between the Company and J. P. Morgan Trust Company, N.A., successor in interest
to Bank One Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee (the “Trustee”), as follows:


 


1.                                       We
have read Sections 2.1, 3.1 and 3.3 of the Indenture and the definitions
therein relating hereto, reviewed the resolutions of the Board of Directors of
the Company adopted on September 12, 2003 (attached as Exhibit B to the
Secretary’s Certificate of even date herewith), the Actions of the Authorized
Officers of February 2, 2004 (attached as Exhibit C to the Secretary’s
Certificate of even date herewith), conferred with executive officers of the
Company and, in our opinion, made such other examinations and investigations as
are necessary to enable us to express an informed opinion as to whether
Sections 2.1, 3.1 and 3.3 of the Indenture have been complied with.


 


2.                                       Based
on the above-described examinations and investigations, in our opinion, all
conditions precedent relating to the authentication and delivery of the Notes,
including those conditions under Sections 2.1, 3.1 and 3.3 of the Indenture,
have been complied with.


 


3.                                       The
terms of the Notes are set forth in the Actions of the Authorized Officers,
dated February 2, 2004 (attached as Exhibit C to the Secretary’s
Certificate of even date herewith).


 


4.                                       In
accordance with the provisions of Section 3.3 of the Indenture, the
Trustee is hereby authorized and requested to authenticate the Notes and to
deliver such Notes to or at the direction of Banc of America Securities LLC, as
representative of the several underwriters.


 


Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have
the respective meanings assigned thereto in the Indenture.


 

















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Officers’
Certificate as of the date first above written.


 


	
   

  	
  ABBOTT LABORATORIES

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Jose M. de Lasa

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Jose M. de Lasa

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Senior Vice President and

  General Counsel

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Terrence C. Kearney

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Terrence C. Kearney

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Vice President and Treasurer
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2014-10037]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Parts 1005, 1006 and 1007

[Doc. No. AMS-DA-07-0059; AO-388-A22, AO-356-A43 and AO-366-A51; DA-07-
03]

Milk in the Appalachian, Florida, and Southeast Marketing Areas; 
Order Amending the Orders

Correction

    In rule document 2014-10037, appearing on pages 24999 through 25002 
in the issue of Friday, May 2, 2014, make the following correction:
    On page 24999, in the third column, in the DATES section, ``May 5, 
2013'' should read ``May 5, 2014''.

[FR Doc. C1-2014-10037 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Louis Ploth, Jr.,
Vice President Business Development and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
      17, 2009
              By: /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis
      Ploth, Jr.Chief
      Financial OfficerRepros
      Therapeutics Inc.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Repros and will be retained by Repros and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130108(40) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ANTONIO L. THOMAS and ANTONIO Stephen J. Markman, L. THOMAS ASSOCIATED, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 130108 COA: 266779 Wayne CC: 02-220633-CZ LA-VAN HAWKINS and URBAN CITY FOODS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees,

and

MELVIN BUTCH HOLLOWELL, Receiver-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of March 31, 2006 is considered, and it is DE NIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk