alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 551.702 Time limits. ( a ) *Claims.* A claimant may at any time file a complaint under the child labor provisions of the Act or an FLSA claim challenging the correctness of his or her FLSA exemption status determination. A claimant may also file an FLSA claim concerning his or her entitlement to minimum wage or overtime pay for work performed under the Act; however, time limits apply to FLSA pay claims. All FLSA pay claims filed on or after June 30, 1994, are subject to a 2-year statute of limitations (3 years for willful violations).
( b ) *Statute of limitations.* An FLSA pay claim filed on or after June 30, 1994, is subject to the statute of limitations contained in the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, as amended (section 255a of title 29, United States Code), which imposes a 2-year statute of limitations, except in cases of a willful violation where the statute of limitations is 3 years. In deciding a claim, a determination must be made as to whether the cause or basis of the claim was the result of a willful violation on the part of the agency.
( c ) *Preserving the claim period.* A claimant or a claimant's designated representative may preserve the claim period by submitting a written claim either to the agency employing the claimant during the claim period or to OPM. The date the agency or OPM receives the claim is the date that determines the period of possible entitlement to back pay. The claimant is responsible for proving when the claim was received by the agency or OPM and for retaining documentation to establish when the claim was received by the agency or OPM, such as by filing the claim using certified, return receipt mail, or by requesting that the agency or OPM provide written acknowledgment of receipt of the claim. If a claim for back pay is established, the claimant will be entitled to pay for a period of up to 2 years (3 years for a willful violation) back from the date the claim was received.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herbert Lindell, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-045 April 9, 2003

NRC DEVELOPS MODEL APPLICATION FOR REACTOR STARTUP

MODIFICATIONS BASED ON USE OF RISK INSIGHTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has developed a model application for

reactor licensees to use when requesting modifications to power plant systems during plant

restart operations. The model application maintains plant safety while providing additional

operational flexibility during startup.

The application, developed through the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process, is

designed to help NRC staff process such requests more efficiently. This is the third of eight riskinformed initiatives the NRC has undertaken to ensure its activities do not present an undue

regulatory burden on licensees.

Current technical specifications (TS) require a nuclear power plant to ensure all relevant

TS systems are working before changing its operating mode -- bringing the reactor closer to full

power. If maintenance activity related to TS systems takes longer than planned, the mode change

could be delayed and hamper a utility’s orderly plant startup and return to power operation. 

The application describes a process for licensees to make allowances concerning a

Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO), with a specific required action and completion time,

that would otherwise prevent a mode change. The allowances would only apply as long as there

is a high likelihood the LCO would be safely resolved within the specified timeframe after the

mode change. Licensees are prevented from making allowances for LCOs involving several

safety-related systems and components, such as emergency diesel generators.

Previous versions of the model application are available on the NRC’s web page at this

address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/techspecs/changes-issued-for-adoption.html .

Physical copies of the documents may be viewed or copied (for a fee) at the NRC’s Public

Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. For more information on the

application, contact Robert Dennig at 301-415-1161.
###
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Projections of educationstatistics to ... Pocket projections**
 
1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999
2001 | 2002 | 2004 | 2005
 
SuDoc:ED 1.302:P 75/ | ED 1.120:
Item Number:0461-D-05 | 0460-A-10
CGP systemNumber:000568870
 
November 7, 2017
Exhibit 4(j)  


SCHEDULE  



	CONTRACT HOLDER
 {Bankers Trust Company, NA}
	
CLASS OF ELIGIBLE OWNERS
 {Accountholders of Broker-Dealers having distribution agreements with Protective Life}
	
JURISDICTION
 This Contract is governed by the laws of the State of {Iowa}
	
{MINIMUM GUARANTEED INTEREST RATE FOR THE GUARANTEED ACCOUNT: {1.00%}}
	
CONTRACT MAINTENANCE FEE {$30}

The contract maintenance fee is deducted prior to the Annuity Commencement Date on each Contract Anniversary, and on any day that the Contract is surrendered other than the Contract Anniversary. The contract maintenance fee will be deducted from the
Allocation Options in the same proportion as their values are to the Contract Value. The contract maintenance fee will be waived by the Company in the event the Contract Value or the aggregate Purchase Payments reduced by surrenders equals or exceeds
$50,000 on the date the contract maintenance fee is to be deducted.
	
MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE
 {0.50%} per annum.
	
ADMINISTRATION CHARGE
 {0.10%} per annum.
	
TRANSFER FEE
 {$25} per transfer in excess of 12 transfers per Certificate in any Contract Year.
	
SALES CHARGE PERCENTAGE APPLIED TO PURCHASE PAYMENTS
 





	

Contract Value or Aggregate Purchase Payments Attributable to a Certificate


	
 	

Sales Charge Percentage

	 	{Less than $50,000}	 	{5.50%}
	 	{At least $50,000 but less than $100,000 }	 	{4.50%}
	 	{At least $100,000 but less than $250,000}	 	{3.50%}
	 	{At least $250,000 but less than $500,000}	 	{2.50%}
	 	{At least $500,000 but less than $1,000,000}	 	{2.00%}
	 	{At least $1,000,000 but less than $2,500,000}	 	{1.00%}
	 	{$2,500,000 or greater}	 	{0.50%}




1





 
ALLOCATION OPTIONS AVAILABLE ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE  



	{Protective Life Guaranteed Account}	 	 
	 	{Fixed Account}

{DCA Fixed Account 1}

{DCA Fixed Account 2}

{DCA Fixed Account 3}	 	 
	
Sub-Accounts of the

Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account:	
 	

 
	

{Goldman Sachs}	
 	

{OppenheimerFunds}
	 	{CORE Small Cap Equity}

{International Equity}

{Mid Cap Value}

{Capital Growth}

{CORE U.S. Equity}

{Growth and Income}	 	        {Global Securities SS}

        {Aggressive Growth SS}

        {Capital Appreciation SS}

        {Main Street SS}

        {Strategic Bond SS}

        {High Income SS}

        {Money}
	
 {Lord Abbett}	
 	
{Van Kampen}
	 	{Growth Opportunities}

{Mid-Cap Value}

{Growth and Income}

{America's Value}

{Bond-Debenture}	 	        {Aggressive Growth II}

        {Emerging Growth II}

        {Enterprise II}

        {Comstock II}

        {Growth and Income II}

        {Government II}

        {UIF Equity and Income II}
	
 {MFS Investment Management}	
 	

 
	 	{New Discovery SS}

{Emerging Growth SS}

{Investors Growth Stock SS}

{Research SS}

{Utilities SS}

{Investors Trust SS}

{Total Return SS}	 	 




2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00453

- CV

GUILLERMO BENAVIDES GARZA INVESTMENT CO. , Manuel A. Benavides, and Norma Z. Benavides, Appellants

v.

Guillermo BENAVIDES

, Z. , Individually and Derivatively on behalf of GBG Ranch, LTD, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CVF

- 00194

- D1 The Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinio n of this date, the trial court’s order of July 2, 2013, granting a temporary injunction is REVERSED and the temporary injunction is DISSOLVED.

We ORDER that the appellants, Guillermo Benavides Garza Investment Co., Manuel A. Benavides, and Norma Z. Bena vides, recover the costs of this appeal from the appellee, Guillermo Benavides, Z., Individually and Derivatively on behalf of GBG Ranch, LTD.

SIGNED July 9, 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
§ 536.405 Availability of information. ( a ) The Office, upon a request which identifies the individual from whose file the information is sought, shall disclose the following information from an appeal file to a member of the public, except when the disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy: ( 1 ) Confirmation of the name of the individual from whose file the information is sought and the names of the other parties concerned;
( 2 ) The status of the appeal;
( 3 ) The results of the appeal (*i.e.,* proper title, pay plan, series, and grade);
( 4 ) The classification requested (*i.e.,* title, pay plan, series, and grade); and
( 5 ) With the consent of the parties concerned, other reasonably identified information from the file.
( b ) The Office will disclose to the parties concerned, the information contained in an appeal file in proceedings under this part, except when the disclosure would violate the proscription against the disclosure of medical information in § 297.205 of this chapter. For the purposes of this section, “the parties concerned” means the Government employee or former Government employee involved in the proceedings, his or her representative designated in writing, and the representative of the agency or the Office involved in the proceeding.
[50 FR 3313, Jan. 24, 1985, as amended at 54 FR 18879, May 3, 1989. Redesignated and amended at 70 FR 31310, May 31, 2005]
Editorial Note on Part 134
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 134 appear at 72 FR 50042, Aug. 30, 2007.

§ 134.214 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Availability.* At the request of a party, or upon his or her own initiative, a Judge may issue a subpoena requiring a witness to appear and testify, or to produce particular documents, at a specified time and place.
( b ) *Requests.* A request for the issuance of a subpoena must be written, served upon all parties, and filed. The request must clearly identify the witness and any documents to be subpoenaed, and must set forth the relevance of the testimony or documents sought.
( c ) *Service.* A subpoena may only be served by personal delivery. The individual making service shall prepare an affidavit stating the date, time, and place of the service. The party which obtained the subpoena must serve upon all other parties, and file with OHA, a copy of the subpoena and affidavit of service within 2 days after service is made.
( d ) *Motion to quash.* A motion to limit or quash a subpoena must be filed and served within 10 days after service of the subpoena, or by the return date of the subpoena, whichever date comes first. Any response to the motion must be filed and served within 10 days after service of the motion, unless a shorter time is specified by the Judge. No oral argument will be heard on the motion unless the Judge directs otherwise.
[61 FR 2683, Jan. 29, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 47249, July 18, 2002; 75 FR 47441, Aug. 6, 2010]
### Response to OMB Comments on CO NAAQS Rosalina Rodriguez to: Kymn, Christine J. 08/04/2011 04:38 PM
Cc: Lydia Wegman, Richard Wayland, Karen Martin, Lewis Weinstock, Deirdre Murphy, Nealson Watkins, Joseph Somers, David Orlin, James Hemby, Bill Lamason, Sherry Russell Hi, Christine: Attached is a file with our response to the 2 comments we received with respect to monitoring under the CO NAAQS, currently under OMB review (with court ordered deadline for signature of August 12). Specifically, the two comments we addressed are: (1) rationale for the 1 million population threshold, and (2) consideration of comments regarding safety concerns for near-road monitors. Please let us know if you have further comments. Thank you. Rosalina M. Rodriguez Associate Division Director, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, USEPA 919-541-5298

Response to OMB 8-4-11 V3.docx
Order filed December 15

, 2011

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 11

- 00 870

- CV

____________

AGNES BROWNLOW , Appellant

V.

PATRICIA MARTINEZ, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1000585



### O R D E R

Appellant ' s brief was due November 2 1, 2011 . No brief or motion for extension of

time has been filed.

Unless appellant submits her brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the

brief was late, to the Clerk of this Court on or before January 17

, 201 2 , the Court will

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
### §21303. Increased funding for formula grants authorized

The Attorney General shall increase the amount provided to a State under the covered formula grants in accordance with this chapter if the State has in place a law that allows the mother of any child that was conceived through rape to seek court-ordered termination of the parental rights of her rapist with regard to that child, which the court is authorized to grant upon clear and convincing evidence of rape.

(Pub. L. 114–22, title IV, §404, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 14043h–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1598 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1598

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
     participate in projects within the San Diego Creek Watershed, 
                  California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2003

   Mr. Cox introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
     participate in projects within the San Diego Creek Watershed, 
                  California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Irvine Basin Surface and Groundwater 
Improvement Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et. 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1635 the following:

``SEC. 1636. IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT 
              PROJECTS.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Irvine 
Ranch Water District, California, is authorized to participate in the 
design, planning, and construction of projects to naturally treat 
impaired surface water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and 
provide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek Watershed.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the projects 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation or maintenance of a project authorized by this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1635 the 
following:

``1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement 
                            projects.''.
                                 <all>
```
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gerald Lau and Sean Webster, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Biopack Environmental
      Solutions Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                   

Dated: August 5, 2010

| | /s/Gerald Lau                                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Gerald Lau, President and Chief Executive Officer          
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                              
| |                                                            
| |                                                            
| | /s/ Sean Webster                                           
| | Sean Webster                                               
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
      Treasurer     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   

---
§ 332.313 Preference eligibles separated from competitive positions. The following persons are entitled to have their names entered on an appropriate existing register in the order prescribed by § 332.401 if they were last employed under career or career-conditional appointments: ( a ) A preference eligible who is declared eligible therefor after appeal from furlough or discharge; and
( b ) A preference eligible who has been furloughed or separated without delinquency or misconduct and who applies within 90 days after furlough or separation.
#### § 353.101 Scope.

The rights and obligations of employees and agencies in connection with leaves of absence or restoration to duty following uniformed service under 38 U.S.C. 4301 et. seq., and restoration under 5 U.S.C. 8151 for employees who sustain compensable injuries, are subject to the provisions of this part. Subpart A covers those provisions that are common to both of the above groups of employees. Subpart B deals with provisions that apply just to uniformed service and subpart C covers provisions that pertain just to injured employees.
### §502. Reservation of minerals to the United States; rights of entry, disposition and removal

Any mining claim given force and effect as provided in section 501 of this title shall be subject to the reservation to the United States of all minerals which, upon August 12, 1953, are provided in the mineral leasing laws to be disposed of thereunder, and the right of the United States, its lessees, permittees, and licensees, to enter upon the land covered by such mining claim to prospect for, mine, treat, store, and remove such minerals, and to use so much of the surface and subsurface of such mining claim as may be necessary for such purposes, and to enter upon such land whenever reasonably necessary for the purpose of prospecting for, mining, treating, storing, and removing such minerals on and from other lands of the United States; and any patent issued for any such mining claim shall contain such reservation.

(Aug. 12, 1953, ch. 405, §2, 67 Stat. 539.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of "mineral leasing laws", see section 505 of this title.
# L_2016021EN.01000101.xml

| 28.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 21/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 21/1

---

Information on the date of entry into force of the Protocol to the Euro Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Tunisia on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Tunisia in Union programs

On 26 October 2015 and 11 January 2016 respectively, the European Union and the Government of the Republic of Tunisia notified each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for entry into force of the above protocol (1).

1

The protocol, signed in Brussels on 17 March 2015, will accordingly enter into force on 1 February 2016, in accordance with Article 10.2 thereof.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 96, 11.4.2015, p. 3.

1

---
|        |
|--------|
|   | *Data for:  2006-2007            Release Date: August 2006           Next Release: September 2008*
*Energy Education Resources: Kindergarten Through 12th               Grade* is published by the National Energy Information Center (NEIC),               a service of the Energy Information Administration (EIA), to provide               students, educators, and other information users a list of generally               available free or low-cost energy-related educational materials.

The entries are listed alphabetically by               organization title. Each entry includes the address, telephone number, and               description of the organization and the energy-related materials               available. Most of the entries also include Internet (Web) and electronic               mail (E-Mail) addresses. In the back of the book there is a subject index               cross-referenced by number to the alphabetical entries. 

Some of the organizations represented in this list take               policy positions on certain energy issues and express them even in               educational materials. Because EIA is the independent statistical and               analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), it does not               advocate any policy position of DOE or any other organization. EIA has               completed this list solely to aid educators and students in locating               materials.

This year’s edition was done by Curley Andrews.

To include a new entry, contact EIA at the following               address:

National Energy Information Center, EI-30 |