alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §426c. Report by Coastal Engineering Research Center

The Coastal Engineering Research Center, in making its report on any cooperative investigation and studies under the provisions of section 426 of this title, relating to shore protection work shall, in addition to any other matters upon which it may be required to report, state its opinion as to (a) the advisability of adopting the project; (b) what public interest, if any, is involved in the proposed improvement; and (c) what share of the expense, if any, should be borne by the United States.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 334, §3, 59 Stat. 508; Pub. L. 88–172, §1, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 304.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Coastal Engineering Research Center has been substituted for Beach Erosion Board pursuant to Pub. L. 88–172, §1, providing in part for the abolition of the Beach Erosion Board, which is set out as a note under section 426 of this title. For transfer of investigatory functions of the Beach Erosion Board to the Coastal Engineering Research Center see section 426–1 of this title.
§ 511.613 Appeals reconsideration by the Office. The Office may, at its discretion, reopen and reconsider a certificate issued under this subpart. ( a ) Requests which contain new and material information, or disagreements over the significance of information, will be remanded to the Director's designee for a decision.
( b ) The Office may reopen and reconsider a decision only when written argument or evidence is presented which establishes a reasonable doubt concerning the technical accuracy of the decision.
[71 FR 37489, June 30, 2006]
### §301. Authorization for lease of oil and gas deposits; by and to whom leased

Whenever the Secretary of the Interior shall deem it to be consistent with the public interest he is authorized to lease deposits of oil and gas in or under lands embraced in railroad or other rights of way acquired under any law of the United States, whether the same be a base fee or mere easement: Provided, That, except as hereinafter authorized, no lease shall be executed hereunder except to the municipality, corporation, firm, association, or individual by whom such right of way was acquired, or to the lawful successor, assignee, or transferee of such municipality, corporation, firm, association, or individual.

(May 21, 1930, ch. 307, §1, 46 Stat. 373.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-222-2018]

                    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by CODEZOL, C.D., grantee of FTZ 163, requesting subzone status for the facility of Puerto Rico Steel Products Corporation, located in Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as                           ( print page 65143)                        amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on December 14, 2018.                

The proposed subzone (14.57 acres) is located at 1011 Corral Falso Km. 1.2 in Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 163.

In accordance with the Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary.

Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is January 28, 2019. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to February 12, 2019.

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the “Reading Room” section of the Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Camille Evans at                     *Camille.Evans@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-2350.                

Dated: December 14, 2018.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-27462 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

SARBANES-OXLEY

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Dan W.Matthias, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mothers Work, Inc;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: August 14,2003

 
| /s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS        |
|----------------------------|
| Dan W. Matthias            |
| *Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

----
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                             Office of Public Affairs, Region I

                                        475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

No. I-05-048 September 15, 2005Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC OFFICIALS TO MEET WITH OFFICIALS FROM PA HOSPITALTO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION OF REQUIREMENTS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with representatives of Crozer-ChesterMedical Center on Sept. 20 to discuss an apparent violation of NRC requirements that was identifiedduring a routine NRC inspection at the Upland, Pa., facility in June of this year. 

The meeting, called a predecisional enforcement conference, is scheduled to begin at 10:00a.m., in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I Office, 475 Allendale Road, in King of Prussia. While the meeting will be open to the public for observation, portions could be closed to the public todiscuss sensitive security aspects of the apparent violation, if necessary. The NRC staff will beavailable to answer questions before the meeting is adjourned.  

While reviewing records during the inspection, NRC inspectors found that last November, thedoor to a high dose rate remote afterloader (HDR) was left open and the device was left unsecured andunattended.  (HDRs are medical devices that use radioactive sources -- in this case iridium-192 -- thatare placed near tumors to kill cancer cells.)  The amount of time the treatment room door was left openwas estimated to be less than 15 minutes.  

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement conference does not mean that the NRC hasdetermined a violation has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken.  Rather, the purpose is todiscuss the apparent violation, including its causes and safety significance; to provide the hospital withan opportunity to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC inspection report; and toenable the hospital to outline its proposed corrective action.  

No decision on the apparent violation will be made at this conference.  That decision will bemade by NRC officials at a later time, after considering the information developed during theinspection and the information provided by the hospital at the conference. 

###
§ 191.75 Exportation by the Government. ( a ) *Claim by U.S. Government.* When a department, branch, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government exports products with the intention of claiming drawback, it may establish the exportation in the manner provided in §§ 191.72 and 191.73 of this subpart (see § 191.4 of this part).
( b ) *Claim by supplier.* When a supplier of merchandise to the Government or any of the parties specified in § 191.82 of this part claims drawback, exportation shall be established under §§ 191.72 and 191.73 of this subpart.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-050 April 10, 2006

NRC, UKRAINE SIGN COOPERATION ARRANGEMENT ON NUCLEAR SAFETY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State Nuclear Regulatory Committee of Ukraine

(SNRCU) signed a bilateral arrangement Monday for the exchange of technical information and

cooperation in nuclear safety matters.

The arrangement was signed at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Md., by NRC Chairman 

Nils J. Diaz and Chairman Olena Mykolaichuk of the SNRCU.

“The NRC and the SNRCU have developed a constructive relationship over the 13 years we

have worked together under an assistance program,” Chairman Diaz said. “This arrangement reflects a

progression of our relationship with the Ukrainian regulator from one of assistance to mutual

cooperation. These cooperative arrangements are a key component of our efforts to promote the

exchange of information on nuclear safety issues throughout the world.”

Under the arrangement, the NRC and the SNRCU may exchange technical reports supporting

licensing actions, information on reactor safety research, and data on operating experience, including

incidents, accidents or shutdowns, as well as documents on emergency planning and response for

nuclear power reactors.

The NRC has provided technical assistance to the SNRCU since 1993 through the Agency for

International Development. The NRC maintains 38 other cooperation arrangements with 35 countries

and Taiwan. (The NRC has two arrangements each with Japan and South Africa, because they have

split ministerial-level regulatory responsibilities.) Similar arrangements are currently being negotiated

with Russia and Bulgaria, and are expected to be finalized later this year.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Nils J. Diaz and Ukraine State Nuclear Regulatory

Committee Chairman Olena Mykolaichuk exchange copies of the bilateral cooperation agreement they

signed April 10 at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD. (photo courtesy USNRC)

###
### §680. Examination of mines; reports

Said commission, or a committee therefrom, or officer of said corps assigned to duty under its orders, shall, whenever deemed necessary, visit said territory and all mines operating under the provisions of this chapter. A report of such examination shall be placed on file.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §20, 27 Stat. 510.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

California Debris Commission abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Army by Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1106, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4229, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-137 October 28, 2004

CORNELL UNIVERSITY TO PROVIDE NEUTRAL MEDIATORS FOR NRC’S

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has contracted with Cornell University’s Institute on

Conflict Resolution to act as the neutral administrator in the agency’s alternative dispute resolution

program (ADR) for addressing discrimination complaints and other allegations of wrongdoing.

The Institute will make its nationwide roster of expert mediators available to the NRC, its

licensees and their employees to facilitate quick and amicable resolution of workplace disputes. The

agency’s ADR program, announced in August, aims to promote a safety-conscious work environment

by providing a means for prompt and fair resolution of worker complaints and timely and effective

resolution of enforcement issues.

The NRC program aims to use ADR in two potential scenarios: (1) before initiation of an NRC

investigation (so-called “early ADR”), when those involved would be the employee and the licensee;

and (2) after completion of an investigation, when the parties would be the NRC and the licensee. The

aim is to reach settlement within 90 days of agreeing to mediation.

“Cornell University’s participation will enhance our program for responding to disputes by

reassuring both workers and licensees that their complaints or concerns will be considered by a truly

neutral person if they choose the early ADR approach,” said Frank Congel, director of the NRC’s

Office of Enforcement.

For early ADR, the mediators’ fees will be paid by the NRC. For ADR after an investigation

has been completed, the NRC and the licensee will share the mediator’s fee. The dollar amount of

NRC’s contract with Cornell therefore depends on how often Cornell’s services are used. While

Cornell’s list of mediators will be offered to parties in any dispute, the parties are not obligated to

choose a neutral party from that list.

More information about the NRC’s alternative dispute resolution program is available on the

agency’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement.html .

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2003-16502; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-86]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Waverly, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Waverly, IA.

EFFECTIVE DATES: 0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on December 2, 2003 
(68 FR 67360) and subsequently published a correction to the direct 
final rule in the Federal Register on December 10, 2003 (68 FR 68973). 
The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 21, 2004.
Paul J. Sheridan,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 04-2440 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
### §702n. Levee rights-of-way; payment or reimbursement for

The Secretary of the Army is authorized, out of any money available for carrying out the provisions of sections 702a, 702b to 702d, 702e to 702g, 702h, 702i, 702j, 702k, 702l, 702m, and 704 of this title, to purchase from, or to reimburse States or local levee districts for the cost of, any levee rights-of-way or easements for the building of levees in the Mississippi Valley for which the United States was or is under obligation to pay under the provisions of said sections regardless of whether said States or local levee districts have furnished such rights-of-way in the past and regardless of the conditions under which such levee rights-of-way were furnished, or may be furnished in the future: Provided, That after careful investigation the prices are found to be reasonable: And provided further, That payments or reimbursements for levee rights-of-way or easements conveying the privilege of building levees may be made as soon as they have been acquired in conformity with local custom or legal procedure in such matters and to the satisfaction of the Chief of Engineers.

(Apr. 23, 1934, ch. 159, 48 Stat. 607; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe design of sport and touring aircraftGeneral considerations concerning the design of a new aircraft are discussed, taking into account the objective to develop an aircraft can satisfy economically a certain spectrum of tasks. Requirements related to the design of sport and touring aircraft included in the past mainly a high cruising speed and short take-off and landing runs. Additional requirements for new aircraft are now low fuel consumption and optimal efficiency. A computer program for the computation of flight performance makes it possible to vary automatically a number of parameters, such as flight altitude, wing area, and wing span. The appropriate design characteristics are to a large extent determined by the selection of the flight altitude. Three different wing profiles are compared. Potential improvements with respect to the performance of the aircraft and its efficiency are related to the use of fiber composites, the employment of better propeller profiles, more efficient engines, and the utilization of suitable instrumentation for optimal flight conduction.Document ID19850010666Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsEppler, R.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Guenther, W.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1984Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:77783NASA-TM-77783DGLR-83-01Meeting InformationMeeting: Probl. and Develop. Trends in Gen. Aviation Symp.Location: FriedrichshafenCountry: GermanyStart Date: March 24, 1983End Date: March 25, 1983Accession Number85N18975Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4006Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850010666.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024