alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-017 January 30, 2007

   NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC TO DISCUSS REVISIONS, ADDITIONS TO PHYSICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public on Feb. 14, from 8 a.m. to  4 p.m. to discuss a proposed rule amending its security regulations related to the physical protection ofnuclear power reactors. The meeting will be held in the Commissioners’ Hearing Room, at NRCheadquarters, in the One White Flint North building, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.

The proposed rulemaking is one of a series to enhance requirements for access controls, eventreporting, security personnel training, coordination between safety and security activities, contingencyplanning and protection against radiological sabotage. The proposed rule would also add requirementsrelated to background checks for firearms users and authorization for enhanced weapons to fulfillcertain provisions in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. In addition, this proposed rulemaking includes alimited number of new security requirements for certain facilities that manufacture uranium fuel.

This proposed rulemaking incorporates requirements that had been previously imposed by theCommission through orders issued after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Additionally, theproposed requirements for safety/security interface address in part, a Petition for Rulemaking (PRM50-80), which requested regulations for governing proposed changes to facilities that could adverselyaffect the licensee’s ability to protect against radiological sabotage.

This proposed rule was published in the Federal Register last year inviting the public to submitcomments. The deadline for the comment period has been extended from Jan. 9, to Feb. 23.

The entire proposed rule can be found on the NRC’s eRulemaking Portal at:http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/library?source=*&library=secreq_lib&file=*&st=prule . 

 More information about security requirements for NRC licensees can be found on the NRC’sWeb site, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/safety-security.html .

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### Emma Krisa, as Administratrix of the Estate of Walter Krisa, Deceased, Respondent, v. John Spragg et al, Defendants, and Socony-Vaouum Oil Company, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant.

*1017Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Lewis, J., concur in reversal of judgment on ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, but dissent as to the dismissal of the complaint and vote to grant a new trial on the ground that the record presents a question of fact.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofMothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Edward M. Krell, Executive Vice President—ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/  EDWARD M. KRELL**                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward M. Krell                                    |
| *Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer* |
| May 17, 2004                                       |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 16 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND 
              JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2003 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 8, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2003.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-70203, 333-73053 and 333-45276) and in the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-82126) of King Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2006, except for the fifteenth paragraph
of Note 19 for which the date is March 2, 2006, relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedules, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Raleigh, NC
March 2, 2006
§ 2423.11 What happens if a Regional Director decides not to issue a complaint? ( a ) *Opportunity to withdraw a charge.* If the Regional Director determines that the charge has not been timely filed, that the charge fails to state an unfair labor practice, or for other appropriate reasons, the Regional Director may request the Charging Party to withdraw the charge.
( b ) *Dismissal letter.* If the Charging Party does not withdraw the charge within a reasonable period of time, the Regional Director will dismiss the charge and provide the parties with a written statement of the reasons for not issuing a complaint.
( c ) *Appeal of a dismissal letter.* The Charging Party may obtain review of the Regional Director's decision to dismiss a charge by filing an appeal with the General Counsel, either in writing or by email to *ogc.appeals@flra.gov ,* within 25 days after the Regional Director served the decision. A Charging Party must serve a copy of the appeal on the Regional Director. The General Counsel must serve notice on the Charged Party that the Charging Party has filed an appeal.
( d ) *Extension of time.* The Charging Party may file a request, either in writing or by email to *ogc.appeals@flra.gov ,* for an extension of time to file an appeal, which must be received by the General Counsel not later than five (5) days before the date the appeal is due. A Charging Party must serve a copy of the request for an extension of time on the Regional Director.
( e ) *Grounds for granting an appeal.* The General Counsel may grant an appeal when the appeal establishes at least one of the following grounds: ( 1 ) The Regional Director's decision did not consider material facts that would have resulted in issuance of a complaint;
( 2 ) The Regional Director's decision is based on a finding of a material fact that is clearly erroneous;
( 3 ) The Regional Director's decision is based on an incorrect statement or application of the applicable rule of law;
( 4 ) There is no Authority precedent on the legal issue in the case; or
( 5 ) The manner in which the Region conducted the investigation has resulted in prejudicial error.
( f ) *General Counsel action.* The General Counsel may deny the appeal of the Regional Director's dismissal of the charge, or may grant the appeal and remand the case to the Regional Director to take further action. The General Counsel's decision on the appeal states the grounds listed in paragraph (e) of this section for denying or granting the appeal, and is served on all the parties. Absent a timely motion for reconsideration, the General Counsel's decision is final.
( g ) *Reconsideration.* After the General Counsel issues a final decision, the Charging Party may move for reconsideration of the final decision if it can establish extraordinary circumstances in its moving papers. The motion must be filed within 10 days after the date on which the General Counsel's final decision is postmarked. A motion for reconsideration must state with particularity the extraordinary circumstances claimed and must be supported by appropriate citations. The decision of the General Counsel on a motion for reconsideration is final.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MIAMI DIVISION 

CASE NO. 20-cv-23278 GAYLES/GOODMAN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

APPROXIMATELY $9,105,221.62 IN FUNDS (PLUS

INTEREST) CURRENTLY HELD BY THE UNITED 

STATES MARSHALS SERVICE REPRESENTING 95% 

OF THE NET PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE 

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 500 WEST 

JEFFERSON STREET, LOUISVILLE, KY 40202

KNOWN AS PNC PLAZA,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

POST-HEARING ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

On May 2, 2024, the Undersigned held an in-person hearing on Claimants’ Motion 

to Dismiss with Prejudice. [ECF Nos. 221; 231]. At the hearing, the Undersigned ordered

as follows:

By July 1, 2024, the parties shall each file a proposed report and recommendations

on CM/ECF related to Claimants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 221]. These proposed 

reports and recommendations must be drafted in a way that if the Undersigned were so 

inclined, he could simply attach his signature on the final page and upload it. 

The filings must focus on the following: (1) the three grounds Claimants asserted 

Case 1:20-cv-23278-DPG Document 233 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2024 Page 1 of 2
2

in their PowerPoint presentation, with an emphasis on the first reason; (2) the distinction 

between the applicable standards for prevailing at trial as opposed to the standard 

necessary to state a claim as a matter of sufficiency of the pleadings; and (3) 

distinguishing (or mentioning) which cited cases found within the parties' filings predate 

the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 ("CAFRA") and which do not.

The memoranda shall not exceed thirty double-spaced pages with size-14 font,

excluding signature block and certificate of service. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, on May 2, 2024. 

Copies furnished to:

The Honorable Darrin P. Gayles

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23278-DPG Document 233 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2024 Page 2 of 2
### §730a. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8512(a)(4), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4759

Section, acts Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, §1, 18 Stat. 372; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §2(a), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1432; Pub. L. 89–670, §6(b)(1), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 938, related to sites for pierhead beacons.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was based on last paragraph under heading "FOR LIFE-SAVING AND LIFE-BOAT STATIONS" of act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, 18 Stat. 372, insofar as such paragraph provided for the right to use and occupy sites for pier-head beacons. Provisions of such paragraph relating to the right to use and occupy sites for Coast Guard Stations and houses of refuge were classified to section 96 of former Title 14, Coast Guard, and were repealed by act Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561, and restated as section 92(f) of Title 14, Coast Guard. Section 92(f) of Title 14 was subsequently renumbered section 501(f) of Title 14.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 29, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
      Corp., Manager of the RegistrantNovember
      9, 2009
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Myrtle Pope, Appellee, v. Fred Jensson, Appellant.

Gen. No. 5,837.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the County Court of Lee county; the Hon. Robert H. Scott, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Prosecution for bastardy by the People of the State of Illinois on the relation of Myrtle Pope against Fred Jensson. There was a verdict of a jury finding defendant guilty and judgment was entered on the verdict. From the judgment, defendant appeals.

Brooks & Brooks, for appellant.

Harry Edwards, for appellee.

*225Abstract of the Decision.

1. Bastards, § *22*
      ***
      *—when finding of guilty sustained by the evidence.*On prosecution for bastardy, a verdict of guilty *held*sustained by the evidence.

2. Appeal and error, § *1561*
      ***
      *—when refusal of requested instructions not error.*Refusal of appellant’s requested instructions which were substantially covered by others given for the appellant, *held*not error.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney

delivered the opinion of the court.
BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                        Certified Public Accountant


1582 TULITA DRIVE                           OFFICE (702) 361-8414
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89123                    FAX NO. (702) 896-0278


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Whom It May Concern:
                                                          January 2, 2001

     The  firm  of  Barry  L. Friedman, P.C., Certified  Public  Accountant
consents  to  the inclusion of their report of  January 2,  2001,  on  the
Financial Statements of Too Late Financial, Corp., as of December 31, 2000,
In any filings  that are  necessary  now  or  in the near future with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,

/s/ Barry L. Friedman

Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
EXHIBIT
10.9


 


Land
Lease

Between

Midwest Investors of Iowa Cooperative

And

Golden Oval Eggs


 


This agreement is made
this first day of October, 1999 by and between Midwest Investors of Iowa,
Cooperative, and Golden Oval Eggs, a cooperative association organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, with a mailing address of P.O. Box 615, 340
Dupont Ave. NE, Renville, MN  56284.


 


LEASE:  Golden Oval Eggs shall
lease from Midwest Investors of Iowa, Cooperative 240 acres of land located in
Winnebago County, Iowa.  The lease shall
be $6,500 per month, payable on the first day of each month.


 


TERM:  This lease shall be
effective from October 1, 1999 until October 1, 2014 at such time it may be
renewed if agreed to by both parties.


 


 


	
  MIDWEST INVESTORS OF IOWA,

  COOPERATIVE

  	
  GOLDEN OVAL EGGS

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Dennis Pap

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Dana Persson

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Its:

  	
  Vice President

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  President

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
  October 1, 1999

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  October 1, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UTU76457, UTU76458, UTU76459, UTU76460, UTU76462, UTU76703, UTU76704, 
UTU77110 and UTU77500]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Leases, Utah

September 24, 2004.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Title IV of the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 
Management Act (Pub. L. 97-451), a petition for reinstatement of oil 
and gas leases UTU76457, UTU76458, UTU76459, UTU76460, UTU76462, 
UTU76703, UTU76704, UTU77110 and UTU77500 for lands in Juab County, 
Utah, was timely filed and required rentals accruing from the date of 
termination, have been paid.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Catlin, Acting Chief, Branch of 
Fluid Minerals at (801) 539-4122.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for 
rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre and 16\2/3\ percent, 
respectively. The $500 administrative fee for the lease has been paid 
and the lessee has reimbursed the Bureau of Land Management for the 
cost of publishing this notice.
    Having met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as 
set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate 
lease UTU77110, effective April 1, 2003, leases UTU76457, UTU76458, 
UTU76459, UTU76460 and UTU76462, effective July 1, 2003, leases 
UTU76703, UTU76704, and UTU77500, effective October 1, 2003, subject to 
the original terms and conditions of the leases and the increased 
rental and royalty rates cited above.

Teresa Catlin,
Acting Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals.
[FR Doc. 04-24667 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
§ 330.710 Proof of eligibility. ( a ) The ICTAP eligible must submit a copy of one of the documents listed under paragraphs (1) or (3) through (6) of the definition of *displaced* in § 330.702, as applicable, to establish selection priority under § 330.709. To establish selection priority under the paragraph (2) of the definition of *displaced* in § 330.702, the ICTAP eligible must submit documentation of the separation or removal, as applicable, for example, the Notification of Personnel Action, SF 50.
( b ) The ICTAP eligible may also submit a copy of the RIF notice with an offer of another position accompanied by the signed declination of that offer. The RIF notice must state that declination of the offer will result in separation under RIF procedures.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neal Ludeke, Chief Financial Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



/s/ Neal Ludeke
------------------------------
Neal Ludeke
Chief Financial Officer of Richman
American Credit Corp., Manager
of the Company
November 13, 2002
§ 178.101 Scope of subpart. ( a ) *Claims covered.* This subpart prescribes general procedures applicable to claims against the United States that may be settled by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3702, 5 U.S.C. 5583 and 38 U.S.C. 5122. In general, these claims involve Federal employees' compensation and leave and claims for proceeds of canceled checks for veterans' benefits payable to deceased beneficiaries.
( b ) *Claims not covered.* This subpart does not apply to claims that are under the exclusive jurisdiction of administrative agencies pursuant to specific statutory authority or claims concerning matters that are subject to negotiated grievance procedures under collective bargaining agreements entered into pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7121(a). Also, these procedures do not apply to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Procedures for FLSA claims are set out in part 551 of this chapter.