alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1699 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1699

 To repeal sections 1173(b) and 1177(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal sections 1173(b) and 1177(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Patient Privacy Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEALS.

    (a) Social Security Act.--Sections 1173(b) and 1177(a)(1) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2(b) and 1320d-6(a)(1)) are 
repealed.
    (b) HIPPA.--Section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and 
Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note) is repealed.
    (c) Regulations.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act, any regulation issued under the authority of a provision repealed 
by this section shall have no force or effect.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON EXPENDITURE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds may be spent to develop or implement any database or 
other system of records containing personal medical information of any 
United States citizen, or to collect medical records for the purpose of 
storing them in a database or other system of records.
    (b) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to personal medical 
information collected for the sole purpose of administering any of the 
following:
            (1) Part A or part B of the Medicare program under title 
        XVIII of the Social Security Act.
            (2) The medicaid program under title XIX of the Social 
        Security Act.
            (3) The health care program for active military personnel 
        under title 10, United States Code.
            (4) The veterans health care program under chapter 17 of 
        title 38, United States Code.
            (5) The Civilian Health and Medical Program of the 
        Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS), as defined in section 1072(4) of 
        title 10, United States Code.
            (6) The Indian health service program under the Indian 
        Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
            (7) The Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan under chapter 
        89 of title 5, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Moliris Corp., D/B/A Advantage
   Packaging., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the
    quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
   Commission (the "Report"), Clyde Parks, Principal Executive and Principal
 Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of
 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to their knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.



/s/
--------------------------------------
Clyde Parks
Principal Executive Officer
June 4, 2004


/s/
--------------------------------------
Clyde Parks
Principal Financial Officer
June 4, 2004


[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be
retained by Moliris Corp, D/B/A Advantage Packaging and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Order entered March 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01369-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.K.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-12692

ORDER

By order dated February 12, 2019, we directed court reporter Elizabeth Neve Griffin to 

file either the reporter’s record of the October 29, 2018 trial or written verification she had filed 

in the trial court a contest to appellant’s declaration of inability to pay and a statement as to the 

status of the contest. To date, Ms. Griffin has not responded.

As it appears a contest was not filed, we ORDER Ms. Griffin to file the record without 

prepayment of costs no later than April 5, 2019.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Sandra 

Jackson, Presiding Judge of the 302nd Judicial District Court; Ms. Griffin; and, the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 99.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas S. Liston, certify that:
         1.     I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of eFundsCorporation:
         2.     Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisamended annual report;
         3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this amended annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annualreport;   Date: November 29, 2002 /s/ Thomas S. ListonBy: Thomas S. ListonIts: Interim Chief Financial Officer
#### Nathan Sloan, trading as Nathan Sloan & Company for use of First National Bank of Chicago, Defendant in Error, v. Queen Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 19,119.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edwin K. Walker, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 23, 1914.

*83Statement of the Case.

This case *held*to be controlled by the decision in *Sloan v. Boston Ins. Co., ante,*p. 81.

It was tried by stipulation upon the same record as in that case, except that the loss sued for was claimed under another one of the seventeen policies referred to in the opinion in that case. This case was submitted to the court for trial without a jury and was tried by the same judge who presided at the trial in the former case.

Charles B. Obermeyer, for plaintiff in error.

Frank M. Fairfield, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 16

AN ACT

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of

the United States for fiscal year 2003.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 16 EH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS

2 FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND JUDGES.

3 Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97–92, Jus4 tices and judges of the United States are authorized dur5 ing fiscal year 2003 to receive a salary adjustment in ac6 cordance with section 461 of title 28, United States Code.

Passed the House of Representatives January 8,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 16

AN ACT

To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and

judges of the United States for fiscal year 2003.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,152,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  508,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   243,000
<INVENTORY>                                    631,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,680,000
<PP&E>                                         971,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,877,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,054,000
<BONDS>                                      2,115,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     776,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,877,000
<SALES>                                      2,433,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,433,000
<CGS>                                        1,271,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,271,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             310,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,269,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,099,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                165,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,934,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 3101.103 Prohibition on purchase of certain assets. ( a ) *General prohibition.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no employee of the Department of the Treasury shall purchase, directly or indirectly, property: ( 1 ) Owned by the Government and under the control of the employee's bureau (or a bureau over which the employee exercises supervision); or
( 2 ) Sold under the direction or incident to the functions of the employee's bureau.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to the purchase of Government securities or items sold generally to the public at fixed prices, such as numismatic items produced by the United States Mint or foreign gifts deposited with the Department pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7342 that an employee may purchase pursuant to 41 CFR part 101-49.
( c ) *Waiver.* An employee may make a purchase otherwise prohibited by this section where a written waiver of the prohibition has been given to the employee by an agency designee with the advice and legal clearance of the DAEO, or the appropriate Office of Chief or Legal Counsel. Such a waiver may be granted only on a determination that the waiver is not otherwise prohibited by law and that, in the mind of a reasonable person with knowledge of the particular circumstances, the purchase of the asset will not raise a question as to whether the employee has used his or her official position or inside information to obtain an advantageous purchase or create an appearance of loss of impartiality in the performance of the employee's duties.
Note:
Employees of the OCC are subject to additional limitations on the purchase of assets that are set out in the OCC-specific rules contained in § 3101.108.
[60 FR 22251, May 5, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 7797, Feb. 12, 2015]
### §1910. Report of disbursements

#### (a) In general

Not later than 60 days after the last day of each semiannual period, the Chief of the Capitol Police shall submit to Congress, with respect to that period, a detailed, itemized report of the disbursements for the operations of the United States Capitol Police.

#### (b) Contents

The report required by subsection (a) shall include—

(1) the name of each person or entity who receives a payment from the Capitol Police and the amount thereof;

(2) a description of any service rendered to the Capitol Police, together with service dates;

(3) a statement of all amounts appropriated to, or received or expended by, the Capitol Police and any unexpended balances of such amounts for any open fiscal year; and

(4) such additional information as may be required by regulation of the Committee on House Administration of the House of Representatives or the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate.

#### (c) Printing

Each report under this section shall be printed as a House document.

#### (d) Effective date

This section shall apply with respect to the semiannual periods of October 1 through March 31 and April 1 through September 30 of each year, beginning with the semiannual period in which this section is enacted.

(Pub. L. 109–55, title I, §1005, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 575.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2006.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-028 February 22, 2006

NRC ISSUES LICENSE TO PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE

FOR SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE FACILITY IN UTAH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a license to Private Fuel Storage, LLC, to

construct and operate an independent spent nuclear fuel storage facility in Skull Valley, Utah.

PFS, a consortium of nuclear power utilities, intends to construct the site on the Reservation of

the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, about 50 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. The facility is

intended for temporary above-ground storage, in large cylindrical casks, of up to 44,000 tons of spent

nuclear fuel from U.S. commercial nuclear power plants.

Although the license, issued Feb. 21, is effective immediately, it does not authorize PFS to

begin immediate construction of the facility. Rather, it conditions construction authorization on the

company first arranging for adequate funding. In addition, PFS must obtain necessary approvals from

other agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the

Surface Transportation Board.

The license is effective for a period of 20 years.

The license incorporates some changes prompted by comments by PFS and the State of Utah on

a draft of the license that was provided to PFS and made public Feb. 13.

###
### SUBCHAPTER I—OIL POLLUTION LIABILITY AND COMPENSATION
#### § 470.205 Initiation of research programs.

OPM will announce opportunities for research contracts by issuing Requests for Proposals (RFP's) in accordance with Federal procurement regulations. Unsolicited proposals may be accepted; however the relevance of the proposed research to OPM research needs will determine the acceptability of the proposal.
# L_2015202EN.01003001.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/30

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 180/2014

of 25 September 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1248]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Decision 2000/180/EC (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, has become obsolete and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Decision 2000/180/EC (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, has become obsolete and consequently the reference thereto should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | For practical reasons, the acts listed under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’ in Chapter XV of Annex II shall be renumbered. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

For practical reasons, the acts listed under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’ in Chapter XV of Annex II shall be renumbered.

| (3) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:

| (1) | the text of point 12j (Commission Decision 2000/180/EC) is deleted; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

the text of point 12j (Commission Decision 2000/180/EC) is deleted;

| (2) | under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’ points 13 (deleted) to 26 (Commission Recommendation of 11 April 2006) are renumbered points 1 to 14. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

under the heading ‘ACTS OF WHICH THE CONTRACTING PARTIES SHALL TAKE NOTE’ points 13 (deleted) to 26 (Commission Recommendation of 11 April 2006) are renumbered points 1 to 14.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 57, 2.3.2000, p. 34.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 297.308 Judicial review. Upon receipt of notification that the denial to amend a record has been upheld on administrative review, the requester has the right to judicial review of the decision for up to 2 years from the date the cause of action arose. Judicial review may be sought in the district court of the United States in the district in which— ( a ) The requester resides;
( b ) The requester has his or her principal place of business; or
( c ) The agency records are situated; or it may be sought in the district court of the District of Columbia.
No. 3369

#### Mabel Albright, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 9, 1943.*

William S. Ellis, for claimant.

*55George F. Barrett, Attorney General; Egbert V. Ostrom, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Eckert, J.

On April 9, 1938, the claimant, Mabel Albright, an employee of the respondent at the Lincoln State School and Colony, slipped and fell upon a patch of ice on the grounds of the institution, sustaining a fracture of the left hip. She was hospitalized from the date of the accident until October 15,1938, and all medical services were furnished by the respondent.

Upon her discharge from the hospital, claimant returned to her home in Lincoln. She walked with crutches until January 15, 1939, and with a cane until the middle of May, 1939. She returned to work on June 1, 1939, at a salary of $90.75 per month, the same salary she received for the year immediately preceding the injury. Claimant received one month’s salary while she was incapacitated. She is a widow with no children under sixteen years of age at the time of the injury.

Claimant and respondent, at the time of the accident, were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State, and notice of the accident and claim for compensation were made within the time provided by the Act. The accident arose out of and in the course of the employment.

The record discloses that claimant suffered a fracture to her left hip about five years prior to the injury *56of April 9, 1938. The record also contains a statement of the comparative degrees of functions of the various component parts of each inferior extremity of claimant as determined by two physicians on August 4, 1941. It is not possible, however, for the court to determine from the record what disability, if any, claimant may have as a result of the injury of April 9, 1938, and what disability, if any, she may have as. a result of the earlier injury. Furthermore, claimant testified that since she has returned to work, her leg is improving, and that she is able to be on her feet as much as three-fourths of her working day. The record is insufficient to sustain an award for any permanent loss of use of claimant’s left leg.

Claimant, however, was totally disabled from April 9, 1938, to June 1, 1939. She is therefore entitled to receive the sum of $10.47 per week for a period of fifty-nine and five-sevenths weeks, or the sum of $625.21.

An award is therefore entered in favor of the claimant in the amount of $625.21, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.
#### § 2638.201 In general.

This subpart establishes certain procedures of the executive branch ethics program. The procedures set forth in this subpart are in addition to procedures established elsewhere in this chapter and in the program advisories and other issuances of the Office of Government Ethics.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


/s/ David Salzman
------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp.,
Manager of the Registrant
February 13, 2006
§ 451.107 OPM responsibilities. ( a ) OPM shall review and approve or disapprove each agency recommendation for an award that would grant more than $10,000 to an individual employee.
( b ) When a recommended award would grant more than $25,000 to an individual employee, OPM shall review the recommendation and submit it (if approved) to the President for final approval.
( c ) OPM shall review and approve or disapprove a request from the head of an Executive agency to extend the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 4505a to any category of employees within that agency that would not be covered otherwise.
( d ) OPM may evaluate the operation and application of an agency's award program(s).