alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-042 March 3, 2005

NRC ISSUES ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR NATION’S NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued annual assessment letters to 102 of the nation’s

103 operating commercial nuclear power plants. The Davis-Besse nuclear facility in Ohio will not be

issued an annual assessment letter by the agency because it is currently under a special NRC oversight

program.

“These letters give interested members of the public an overview of how the plants have

performed,” said Bruce Boger, Director of the Division of Inspection Program Management in the

NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “The NRC will meet with the licensees of each plant to

publicly discuss their performance over the past year.”

A separate announcement will be issued for each plant meeting.

In addition to the annual assessment letters, plants also receive an NRC inspection plan. 

Updated information on plant performance is posted to the NRC web site every quarter. Most plants

also receive a mid-cycle assessment letter during the year; the next mid-cycle letters will be issued in

September.

The assessment letters sent to each licensee are available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html and through ADAMS, the Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System. Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC

Public Document Room by calling (301) 415-4737 or (800) 397-4209.

###
Exhibit 99.1

**Certification ofCEO****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Gateway,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the financial requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                |   |      |
|---------------------|--------|-----------|
| Dated: May 13, 2003 |   | By:  | /s/ THEODORE W. WAITT |
|                |   |      |  |
|                |   |      | **Theodore W. Waitt****Chairman & Chief Executive Officer** |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(May 12, 1948.)

#### Vincent-Wilday, Inc., Respondent, v. Raymond W. Strait, Appellant.

Order reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and motion denied, without costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: Defendant may appeal from the *1055order herein. *(Cullen*v. *Uptegrove,*101 App. Div. 147; *O’Reilly*v. *New York Central R. R. Co.,*240 App. Div. 1009.) The defendant was competent to testify as to his past and present condition and as to his ability to work without being caused pain. His testimony thereon was uncontradicted. The reasons assigned by the County Judge for granting the motion were not justified on the evidence. All concur. (The order grants plaintiff’s motion for a new trial unless defendant stipulates to reduce the verdict in favor of him on his counterclaim, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCum, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT**  **FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA**  No. DA 23

- 0047 TAMARA CHAMBERLAIN , Defendant and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee

. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Defendant and Appellant ’s Motion For Extension Of Time , and with good cause shown, Defendant and Appellant Tamera Chamberlain is hereby granted an extension of time until February 9, 2024, in which to prepare, file and serve Defendant and Appellant ’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 22 2023

12/22/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0047
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1596

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2318 Woodson Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Timothy Michael Gaffney Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1596 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2318 Woodson Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall 

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘Timothy Michael 

5 Gaffney Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Timothy Michael Gaffney Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 6, 2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-063 October 29, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC JUDGE GRANTS HEARING IN CASE OF BUCKS COUNTY IRRADIATOR

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission judge has granted certain Quakertown residents a

hearing to oppose an NRC license granted to CFC Logistics, Inc., for operation of a cobalt-60

irradiator in Milford Township (Bucks County), Pa. In a decision issued today, the judge has

ruled that the petitioners had legal standing to seek the hearing and that some of their areas of

concern are germane to the hearing process. 

CFC Logistics filed its application for an NRC license on February 25. The citizen

petitioners filed their request for a hearing on the validity of that application on June 23. Under

NRC rules, the request for a hearing did not itself prohibit granting of the license, which the

NRC Staff issued on August 27. Oral argument was held on the request for a hearing and a stay

request on September 10 in Allentown, Pa. The judge denied the request for a stay of the NRC

license on September 23, and cobalt-60 sources have since been loaded into the irradiator. 

This order does not assess whether the petitioners’ concerns have merit; only that the

areas of concern are sufficiently “germane” to warrant a hearing. A decision on whether those

concerns have merit will be made by the presiding officer as a result of the hearing, which

involves written evidentiary presentations by both sides. The presiding officer also has the

authority to call later for oral testimony. 

The Chairman of the NRC’s independent Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel

appointed Judge Michael C. Farrar as presiding officer in this case. His Special Assistant for

purposes of analyzing technical matters is Judge Charles N. Kelber, Ph.D. 

The company has 10 days to appeal this decision to the Commission. 

Copies of the decision may be obtained from the Region I Office of Public Affairs.

###
#### §§ 1636.152-1636.159 [Reserved]
§ 297.208 Judicial review. Upon receipt of notification that the denial of access has been upheld on administrative review, the requester has the right to judicial review of the decision for up to 2 years from the date on which the cause of action arose. Judicial review may be sought in the district court of the United States in the district in which— ( a ) The requester resides;
( b ) The requester has his or her principal place of business; or
( c ) The agency records are situated; or it may be sought in the district court of the District of Columbia.
### §579d. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title III, §360(e), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2733

Section, Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1301, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1686, related to deauthorization of inactive projects as of Public Law 114–322.
§ 550.1005 Agency responsibilities. ( a ) An agency may require an employee to submit his or her request to use religious compensatory time off with all the information specified in § 550.1004(b) in a manner that is administratively acceptable to the agency. To the maximum extent practicable, the agency must require that the request be in writing (including electronic communications). If the agency accepts an oral request, the agency must document all the information specified in § 550.1004(b) and must require the employee to submit a written document containing all the information as soon as practicable. An agency may require an employee to submit a request to use religious compensatory time off sufficiently in advance to accommodate necessary scheduling changes without interfering with the agency's ability to efficiently carry out its mission.
( b ) An agency must approve an employee's request to use religious compensatory time off unless the agency determines that approving the request would interfere with the agency's ability to efficiently carry out its mission. If the employee's request to use religious compensatory time off is denied, the agency must provide a written explanation as to the reason the request has been denied, regardless of whether the employee's request was written or oral.
( c ) The agency must provide the employee with an opportunity to earn religious compensatory time off before the deadline established in § 550.1006(c), although the specific timing of when an employee will be allowed to earn religious compensatory time off by performing overtime work is a matter of agency discretion based on the needs of the agency.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 4(d)

                                 BYLAW AMENDMENT

                            ADDITION TO ARTICLE VIII

Section 14. Prohibited Indemnification. Notwithstanding anything in this Article
VIII to the contrary, the Corporation shall not indemnify any person against any
expense, penalties, payments or judgments incurred as the result of an
administrative proceeding or civil action instituted by an appropriate federal
banking regulatory agency, which indemnification would result in a prohibited
indemnification payment as defined by applicable statute or regulation.



                                       16
### §§886, 887. Repealed. June 21, 1955, ch. 172, §5(1), (2), 69 Stat. 170

Section 886, R.S. §4687, related to employment of officers of Army and Navy in the work of surveying the coast of the United States.

Section 887, R.S. §4688; acts Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 837, §1, 26 Stat. 382; June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 929, provided for allowance for subsistence to officers of Army and Navy while employed on coast survey service.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Additional Repeal

Sections were also repealed by act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641. Section 49(a) of act Aug. 10, 1956, provided in part that laws effective after Mar. 31, 1955, inconsistent with that act, should be considered as superseding it to the extent of the inconsistency.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan W.Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   | ** ** |
|---------------------------|------------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| February 9, 2006          |

 

----
### §2608. Civil penalty procedures

#### (a) General procedures

After notice and an opportunity for a hearing, a person found by the Secretary of Transportation to have violated this chapter or a regulation prescribed under this chapter for which a civil penalty is provided, is liable to the United States Government for the civil penalty provided. The amount of the civil penalty shall be assessed by the Secretary by written notice. In determining the amount of the penalty, the Secretary shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the prohibited acts committed and, with respect to the violator, the degree of culpability, any history of prior offenses, ability to pay, and other matters that justice requires.

#### (b) Compromising penalties

The Secretary may compromise, modify, or remit, with or without consideration, a civil penalty under this chapter until the assessment is referred to the Attorney General.

#### (c) Referral to Attorney General

If a person fails to pay an assessment of a civil penalty after it has become final, the Secretary may refer the matter to the Attorney General for collection in an appropriate district court of the United States.

#### (d) Refund of penalty

The Secretary may refund or remit a civil penalty collected under this chapter if—

(1) application has been made for refund or remission of the penalty within one year from the date of payment; and

(2) the Secretary finds that the penalty was unlawfully, improperly, or excessively imposed.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title IV, §4108, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4158.)
§ 536.401 Placement and classification plans. ( a ) Agencies which employ individuals subject to this part are required to establish in writing placement and classification plans.
( b ) The placement and classification plans must commit the agency to: ( 1 ) Identify and correct classification errors; and
( 2 ) Correct position management problems; and
( 3 ) Carry out specific planned efforts to place employees subject to this part; and
( 4 ) Pursue placement efforts that do not adversely affect affirmative action goals.
[45 FR 85656, Dec. 30, 1980. Redesignated at 70 FR 31310, May 31, 2005.]
### §10612. Prohibition of participation by violent offenders

The Attorney General shall—

(1) issue regulations or guidelines to ensure that the programs authorized in this subchapter do not permit participation by violent offenders; and

(2) immediately suspend funding for any grant under this subchapter, pending compliance, if the Attorney General finds that violent offenders are participating in any program funded under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2952, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title II, §2301(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1795.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797u–1 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Regulations

Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §103(c), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 668, provided that: "Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act [Apr. 9, 2008], the Secretary [probably should be "the Attorney General"] shall revise any regulations or guidelines described in section 2952 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797u–1) [now 34 U.S.C. 10612] in accordance with the amendments made by subsection (a) [amending section 10613 of this title]. Such regulations shall specify that grant amounts under part EE of such Act [34 U.S.C. 10611 et seq.] shall be reduced for any drug court that does not adopt the definition of 'violent offender' under such part, as amended by subsection (a) of this section, within 3 years after such date of enactment."
***Exhibit******32***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A of Allied Resources, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my        knowledge and belief:         

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuerat the endof the period covered by this report and resultsof operations of the small business issuerfor the period covered by this                report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: August21, 2008                  

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Thiscertification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuerfor the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of        1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 hasbeen provided to the small business issuerand will be retained by the small business issuerand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.         

24
#### Michael F. Allen, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

No opinion. Present'— Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part. [179 Misc. 539.]
### §2501. Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1) The washing ashore of potentially infectious medical wastes from public vessels of the United States may pose serious and widespread risks to public health and to the welfare of coastal communities.

(2) Current Federal law provides inadequate protections against the disposal of such wastes from such vessels into ocean waters.

(3) Operators of such vessels must take immediate action to stop disposing of such wastes into ocean waters.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title III, §3102, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4152.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 100–688, title III, §3101, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4152, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle A (§§3101–3105) of title III of Pub. L. 100–688, enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'United States Public Vessel Medical Waste Anti-Dumping Act of 1988'."
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTExhibit 32CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Moliris Corp., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), Clyde R. Parks, Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer ofthe Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350), that to their knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ ClydeR. Parks Clyde R. Parks Principal Executive Officer September 1, 2005/s/ ClydeR. Parks Clyde R. Parks Principal Financial Officer September 1, 2005A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MolirisCorp. and will be retained by Moliris Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
30