alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

rnm~"'li"!!'~~"~"~ IiiOlTTlN(] "'MOOl

ANE-J73

[4910-13-PJb=~_

INITIII.l-"'IG

M. Hollh"

DATE

[Docket No. FAA-20l0-0037j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-240-ADj Amendment I10 LtJ I . .

39-**; AD *,:1/ J 0 I 0 - Iq - 03

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing companr Model 737-700 (lOW) Series

Airplanes Equipped with Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Installed in Accordance with

.1

Configuration 3 ofSupplementaJ Type Certificate ST00936NY

I

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiTSS directive (AD) for certain Model

737-700 (lOW) series airplanes. This AD requil1{s deactivation or modification ofPA 1'8

Aircraft, LLC, auxiliary fuel tanks. This AD resJIts from fuel system reviews conducted

by the manufacturer. We are issuing this AD to Jrevent the potential of ignition sources

inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with flJnmable fuel vap~rs, could result in fuel

'ank explosions and consequent loss of the airr+e,

DATES: This AD is effective [INSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER DATE OF

I

PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER],

The Director of the Federal Register appJoved the incorporation by reference of

[a] certain publication[s] listed in the AD as of [LSERT DATE 35 DAYS AFTER

DATE OF PUBLICA nON IN THE FEDERAL IREGISTER],

ADDRESSES: For service information identifier in this AD, contact Decrane

Aerospace, PATS Aircraft Systems, 21652 Nant,coke Avenue. Georgetown. Delaware,

19947; telephone 302-253-6157; fax 302-855-01 3; e-mail:

LNlTI~I_'r.;")

DhTh DJ:"U

~ It "/'0

~al!I'INGS\'MnOI,

ANE-I7J

C.C~

ohg-II'-j, 0
Exhibit31.1I, Yaron Tal, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TopSpin Medical, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;     (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.          Date: November 8, 2007 /s/ Yaron Tal   Yaron Tal   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64318-64319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24670]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NM-920-1310-04; NMNM 96135]

Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease NMNM 96135

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 96135 for lands in San Juan 
County, New Mexico, was timely filed and was accompanied by all 
required rentals and royalties accruing from March 1, 2004, the date of 
termination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico 
State Office, (505) 438-7586.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued affecting the 
lands. The lessee has agreed to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 
administrative fee and has reimbursed the Bureau of Land Management for 
the

[[Page 64319]]

cost of this Federal Register notice. The Lessee has met all the 
requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in sections 
31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and 
the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate the lease 
effective March 1, 2004, subject to the original terms and conditions 
of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 04-24670 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
```
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-054 October 2, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC PUBLIC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR OCT. 6TH TO DISCUSS

INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR PLANT’S ALERT AND NOTIFICATION SYSTEM

Current performance issues involving the Indian Point nuclear power plant’s emergency

notification system will be the topic of an NRC public meeting scheduled for Friday, Oct. 6. The

meeting, which will be between NRC and Entergy management, will begin at 1 p.m. at Crystal Bay on

the Hudson – Charles Point Marina, 5 John Walsh Blvd. in Peekskill, N.Y. (Directions are available

at: http://www.crystal-bay.com/location.html .)

Following the meeting, which will be open to public observation, NRC staff will be available to

answer questions regarding the subject.

Entergy Nuclear Northeast operates Indian Point, located in Buchanan, N.Y. Like other U.S.

commercial nuclear power plants, Indian Point is required to have an alert and notification system

within the 10-mile emergency planning zone around the facility. The system is designed to alert the

public in the unlikely event that there is an event at the plant, so that they can listen to the emergency

broadcast stations in their area for information and instructions.

In recent years, Indian Point’s siren system has experienced a number of failures. More

recently, there have been three occasions when the system was unavailable due to hardware and/or

human performance problems. The purpose of the Oct. 6th meeting is to discuss the company’s

corrective actions to address the system’s ongoing performance issues; steps being taken by the

company to avoid similar problems with the new system it is installing; and the status of the

installation of that new system.

In response to an NRC order issued last January that implements requirements in the Energy

Policy Act of 2005, Entergy is replacing its current emergency notification system. Among other
 things, the order requires that the new system feature back-up power. Entergy is required to satisfy the

requirements of the order by Jan. 30, 2007.

### 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's web site.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1310-01; WYW130635]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas 
lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 
3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a 
petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW130635 for lands in 
Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was 
accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated 
under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. 
Lewis, Chief, Fluid Chief Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lessee has agreed to the amended lease 
terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction 
thereof, per year and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The lessee has 
paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the 
Department for the cost of this Federal Register notice. The lessee has 
met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in 
section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 
U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to 
reinstate lease WYW130635 effective November 1, 2003, under the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting 
the lands.

Pamela J. Lewis,
Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 04-24673 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-7138

DAVID EUGENE CRAWFORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby.

Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.

(CR-93-11, CA-97-3-4-V)

Submitted: August 18, 1998

Decided: September 3, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated in part, dismissed in part, and remanded by unpublished per

curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

David Eugene Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

David E. Crawford appeals from the district court's orders denying

his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998), and his motion for reconsideration. We deny Crawford's

motion for a certificate of appealability as to all claims other than

Crawford's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to file

an appeal, and dismiss those claims on the reasoning of the district

court that the evidence does not support Crawford's claims for relief.

United States v. Crawford, Nos. CR-93-11; CA-97-3-4-V (W.D.N.C.

July 2, 1997).

A defense attorney's failure to comply with his client's request to

file an appeal constitutes per se ineffective assistance of counsel. See

United States v. Peak, 992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir. 1993). Furthermore,

a district court may not credit an attorney's affidavit over a petitioner's verified papers without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See

Williams v. Griffin, 952 F.2d 820, 823 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly,

we grant Crawford's motion for a certificate of appealability as to the

limited claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's

alleged failure to file an appeal after being asked to do so, vacate in

part as to that claim, and remand that claim to the district court for

an evidentiary hearing. We deny Crawford's motion to amend his

informal brief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART, AND REMANDED 

 2
Exhibit 31.1

I,
Anthony DiSandro, Chief Executive Officer of PSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



6.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date:
April 5, 2004

| |  | /s/ANTHONY DISANDROAnthony DiSandro
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**WisconsinAdvisory Committee to****theU.S. Commission on Civil Rights**

| **Geraldine      McFadden, *Chairperson***Mequon
**P.      Emraida K. Kiram**Milwaukee
**Francis      J. Carleton III**      Green Bay
**John      C. Metcalf**Madison**Joseph      J. Eastman**Madison**Manuel      Jesse Torres**Milwaukee**Georgia      Pride-Euler**      Madison
**Sidney      A. Vineburg**Green Bay |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### **CHAPTER 407—DNA IDENTIFICATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES

Sec.
40701.
The Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program.
40702.
Collection and use of DNA identification information from certain Federal offenders.
40703.
Collection and use of DNA identification information from certain District of Columbia offenders.
40704.
Conditions of release generally.
40705.
Authorization of appropriations.
40706.
Privacy protection standards.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—TRAINING, TECHNOLOGY, RESEARCH, AND EXPANDED USE

40721.
Report to Congress on plans to modify CODIS system.
40722.
DNA training and education for law enforcement, correctional personnel, and court officers.
40723.
Sexual assault forensic exam program grants.
40724.
DNA research and development.
40725.
National Forensic Science Commission.
40726.
DNA identification of missing persons.
40727.
Kirk Bloodsworth Post-Conviction DNA Testing Grant Program.
40728.
Establishment of best practices for evidence retention.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—DNA ARRESTEE COLLECTION PROCESSES

40741.
Definitions.
40742.
Grants to States to implement DNA arrestee collection processes.
40743.
Expungement of profiles.
40744.
Offset of funds appropriated.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To iDLX HOLDINGS NV:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of iDLX HOLDINGS NV,
a company incorporated in the Netherlands, and its subsidiary (the "Group") as
of December 31, 2001 and the related consolidated statement of income, changes
in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based upon our audits, the consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Group as of December 31, 2001, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America.

/s/ Arthur Andersen & Associates
Chennai, India
January 25, 2002

             THIS IS A COPY OF A PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ANDERSEN REPORT.
                 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ANDERSEN.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited March 31, 1998 Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations for
the three months ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such statements as filed in the Company's Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended March 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,284,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  365,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    398,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,126,792
<PP&E>                                       1,617,753
<DEPRECIATION>                               (812,345)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,935,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          286,896
<BONDS>                                        160,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    804,435
<COMMON>                                    10,955,966
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,486,525)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,935,637
<SALES>                                        589,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               589,806
<CGS>                                          511,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  511,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               398,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (309,589)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (313,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (313,157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>