alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-074            June 11, 2007

NRC MEETING JUNE 27 TO DISCUSS REVIEW PROCESS FOREXPECTED NEW REACTOR APPLICATION NEAR BAY CITY, TEXAS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will conduct a public meeting in Bay City, Texas, onWednesday, June 27, to discuss how the agency will review an expected Combined License applicationfor new reactors at the South Texas Project nuclear power plant, located southwest of Bay City. NRGEnergy, the prospective applicant, has told the NRC it intends to apply early this fall for a license tobuild and operate two Advanced Boiling Water Reactors at the South Texas Project site.

“NRG may be among the first companies in many years to apply for a license to build andoperate a nuclear power plant. The NRC is devoting significant resources to prepare for theseapplications, so we’ll be ready to review them when they’re submitted,” said William Borchardt,Director of the NRC’s Office of New Reactors. “We want to make sure the communities around theSouth Texas Project and other potential sites fully understand how we’ll go through this process andhow they can participate and stay informed.”

The meeting will be held at the Bay City Civic Center, 201 Seventh St., from 7 p.m. until 11p.m.  NRC staff presentations will describe the overall Combined License review process, whichincludes safety and environmental assessments, as well as how the public can participate in the process.The NRC will host an open house for two hours prior to the meeting so members of the public have theopportunity to talk informally with agency staff.

More information on the NRC’s new reactor licensing process is available on the agency’s Website here: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### Reader Mail, Inc., v. Sol Fishko, as President of Paper Workers *&*Distributing Trades Union, Local 447, of International Printing Pressmen and Assistants’ Union of North America, A. F. of L.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24710]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1570-DR]

Virginia; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-1570-DR), dated October 18, 2004, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective September 30, 2004.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-24710 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
```
### §10407. Utilization of private sector

Funds or a portion of funds allocated under this subchapter may be used by a State or unit of local government that receives a grant under this subchapter to contract with private, nonprofit entities, or community-based organizations to carry out the purposes specified under section 10401(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1806, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12102(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1866.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ee–6 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1806 of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title II, §20201(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1822, and classified to former section 3796ee–5 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, required each State and unit of local government to submit an annual evaluation of programs, prior to the general amendment of part R of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 107–273.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-84,245-02

EX PARTE MAURICE SAMUEL ARRINGTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 69198-B IN THE 426 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM BELL COUNTY

ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion.

CONCURRING OPINION

Ijoin this Court’s remand order because I agreewith its observation that applicant has alleged

facts that, “if true, might entitle him to relief.” Because applicant has pleaded a colorable

ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, Iwould orderthe habeas court on remand to appoint counsel

for him upon request if he is indigent, regardless of whether the trial court holds a hearing. See Ex

parte Pointer, 492 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 (Tex.Crim.App. 2016) (per curiam) (Alcala, J., concurring). 

At a minimum, however, in addition to the order’s current admonition that the appointment of

counsel is mandatory for an indigent applicant upon request if the habeas court holds a hearing, I

would include a further admonishment that an indigent applicant is “entitled” to the appointment of

counsel upon request “if the court concludes that the interests of justice require representation.” See

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ART. 1.051(d). 

Filed: January 11, 2017

Do Not Publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6777
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NATHANIEL HOOVER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-94-137, CA-95-337-3-MU) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nathaniel Hoover, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals district court's denial of his "motion to proceed wit hout extra time." We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. In light of this disposition, we also deny Appellant's motion for bail pending appeal.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 2423.23 Prehearing disclosure. Unless otherwise directed or approved by the Judge, the parties shall exchange, in accordance with the service requirements of § 2429.27(b) of this subchapter, the following items at least 14 days prior to the hearing: ( a ) *Witnesses.* Proposed witness lists, including a brief synopsis of the expected testimony of each witness;
( b ) *Documents.* Copies of documents, with an index, proposed to be offered into evidence; and
( c ) *Theories.* A brief statement of the theory of the case, including relief sought, and any and all defenses to the allegations in the complaint.
#### § 317.202 Suitability inquiries regarding criminal history.

Agency inquiries regarding criminal history must be done in accordance with the requirements under chapter 92 of title 5, U.S. Code and part 920 of this chapter.

[88 FR 60329, Sept. 1, 2023]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ARMANDO MARTINEZ,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00046-CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D04459)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Natalie Martinez’s request for an extension of time within which to 

file the Reporter’s Record until June 25, 2019. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS 

COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Natalie Martinez, Official Court Reporter for the 409th

District Court for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record and forward the same to 

this Court on or before June 25, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of May, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### § 630.1111 Limitation on the amount of donated annual leave received by an emergency leave recipient.

An emergency leave recipient may receive a maximum of 240 hours of donated annual leave at any one time from an emergency leave transfer program for each disaster or emergency. After taking into consideration the amount of donated annual leave available to all approved emergency leave recipients and the needs of individual emergency leave recipients, an employing agency may allow an employee to receive additional disbursements of donated annual leave based on the employee's continuing need. Each disbursement of transferred annual leave may not exceed 240 hours.
§ 430.310 Details and job changes. ( a ) When a senior executive is detailed or temporarily reassigned for 120 days or longer, the gaining organization must set performance goals and requirements for the detail or temporary assignment. The gaining organization must appraise the senior executive's performance in writing, including through the use of automated systems, and this appraisal must be considered when deriving the initial summary rating.
( b ) When a senior executive is reassigned or transferred to another agency after completing the minimum appraisal period, the supervisor must appraise the executive's performance in writing, including through the use of automated systems, before the executive leaves and provide this information to the executive.
( c ) The most recent annual summary rating and any subsequent appraisals must be transferred to the gaining agency or organization. The gaining supervisor must consider the rating and appraisals when deriving the initial summary rating at the end of the appraisal period.
### §493. Use of railroad bridges by other railroad companies

All railroad companies desiring the use of any railroad bridge built in accordance with the provisions of sections 491 to 494 and 495 to 498 of this title, shall be entitled to equal rights and privileges relative to the passage of railway trains or cars over the same and over the approaches thereto upon payment of a reasonable compensation for such use; and in case of any disagreement between the parties in regard to the terms of such use or the sums to be paid all matters at issue shall be determined by the Secretary of Transportation upon hearing the allegations and proofs submitted to him.

(Mar. 23, 1906, ch. 1130, §3, 34 Stat. 85; Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2440.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Secretary of War". See Transfer of Functions note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions, powers, and duties of Secretary of the Army [formerly War] and other offices and officers of Department of the Army [formerly War] under this section to extent that they relate generally to location and clearances of bridges and causeways in navigable waters of United States transferred to and vested in Secretary of Transportation by Pub. L. 89–670, §6(g)(6)(B), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 941. Pub. L. 97–449 amended this section to reflect transfer made by section 6(g)(6)(B) of Pub. L. 89–670, and repealed section 6(g)(6)(B).
### §745a. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8512(a)(6), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4759

Section, act May 13, 1938, ch. 215, §1, 52 Stat. 353; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §2(a), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1432; Pub. L. 89–670, §6(b)(1), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 938, related to traveling expenses of new appointees to isolated posts outside the United States.
#### Sutton Carpet Cleaners, Inc., v. Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey. Ruth C. Wright v. Hyman Levine et al. and Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey.

Motion for leave to appeal to the .Court pf Appeals or for peargument denied, with $10 costs. *1008Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 944.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          63,793
<SECURITIES>                                    62,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                       756
<INVENTORY>                                     48,473
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,078
<PP&E>                                          84,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 364,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,666
<BONDS>                                        172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                     105,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   364,857
<SALES>                                         39,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,092
<CGS>                                           28,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       758
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,298)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
#### Speedway Products, Inc., Respondent, v. Frank Calland, Individually and as President of Local 786 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, A. F. of L., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present —■ Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 822.]
### §10383. Renewal of grants

#### (a) In general

Except for grants made for hiring or rehiring additional career law enforcement officers, a grant under this subchapter may be renewed for up to 2 additional years after the first fiscal year during which a recipient receives its initial grant, if the Attorney General determines that the funds made available to the recipient were used in a manner required under an approved application and if the recipient can demonstrate significant progress in achieving the objectives of the initial application.

#### (b) Grants for hiring

Grants made for hiring or rehiring additional career law enforcement officers may be renewed for up to 5 years, subject to the requirements of subsection (a), but notwithstanding the limitation in that subsection concerning the number of years for which grants may be renewed.

#### (c) Multiyear grants

A grant for a period exceeding 1 year may be renewed as provided in this section, except that the total duration of such a grant including any renewals may not exceed 3 years, or 5 years if it is a grant made for hiring or rehiring additional career law enforcement officers.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1703, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title I, §10003(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1812.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796dd–2 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### § 410.303 Employee responsibilities.

Employees are responsible for self-development, for successfully completing and applying authorized training, and for fulfilling continued service agreements. In addition, they share with their agencies the responsibility to identify training needed to improve individual and organizational performance and identify methods to meet those needs, effectively and efficiently.
### §3034. Officer candidates

#### (a) Determination of number

The Secretary shall determine the number of appointments of officer candidates.

#### (b) Appointment

Appointment of officer candidates shall be made under regulations, which the Secretary shall prescribe, including regulations with respect to determining age limits, methods of selection of officer candidates, term of service as an officer candidate before graduation from the basic officer training program of the Administration, and all other matters affecting such appointment.

#### (c) Dismissal

The Secretary may dismiss from the basic officer training program of the Administration any officer candidate who, during the officer candidate's term as an officer candidate, the Secretary considers unsatisfactory in either academics or conduct, or not adapted for a career in the commissioned officer corps of the Administration. Officer candidates shall be subject to rules governing discipline prescribed by the Director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps.

#### (d) Agreement

#### (1) In general

Each officer candidate shall sign an agreement with the Secretary in accordance with section 3006(a)(2) of this title regarding the officer candidate's term of service in the commissioned officer corps of the Administration.

#### (2) Elements

An agreement signed by an officer candidate under paragraph (1) shall provide that the officer candidate agrees to the following:

(A) That the officer candidate will complete the course of instruction at the basic officer training program of the Administration.

(B) That upon graduation from such program, the officer candidate—

(i) will accept an appointment, if tendered, as an officer; and

(ii) will serve on active duty for at least four years immediately after such appointment.

#### (e) Regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. Such regulations shall include—

(1) standards for determining what constitutes a breach of an agreement signed under subsection (d)(1); and

(2) procedures for determining whether such a breach has occurred.

#### (f) Repayment

An officer candidate or former officer candidate who does not fulfill the terms of the obligation to serve as specified under subsection (d) shall be subject to the repayment provisions of section 3006(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §234, as added Pub. L. 116–259, title III, §305(a), Dec. 23, 2020, 134 Stat. 1172.)
#### § 1655.19 Effect of court order on loan.

Upon receipt of a document that purports to be a qualifying retirement benefits court order, qualifying legal process relating to a participant's legal obligation to provide child support or to make alimony payments, or a qualifying child abuse order, the participant's TSP account will be frozen. After the account is frozen, no loan will be allowed until the account is unfrozen. The Board's procedures for processing court orders and legal processes are explained in 5 CFR part 1653.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-035 July 1, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC IN NEW YORK

ON NINE MILE POINT LICENSE RENEWAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public information meeting on Thursday

evening, July 8th, to discuss the process the agency will follow in reviewing the application

submitted by Constellation Nuclear to renew the licenses for Nine Mile Point Units 1 and 2 in

Scriba, N.Y. 

Constellation Nuclear submitted a license renewal application for the two units on May

27. The current operating licenses for Units 1 and 2 expire on August 22, 2009, and October 31,

2026, respectively

The meeting will be held from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the Joint News Center, 10

Airport Road, in Fulton, N.Y. The NRC’s presentation will include information on how the

process works and how the public can participate. Members of the public are invited to ask

questions on the NRC’s license renewal review process. 

"It’s an opportunity for the public to learn about the license renewal process early on. We

look forward to helping the public better understand our review process," said Samson S. Lee,

NRC license renewal section chief. 

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant is issued

for 40 years. It may be renewed for up to an additional 20 years if NRC requirements are met. 

The license renewal process requires that both a technical review of safety issues and an

environmental review be performed for each application. The NRC staff is currently reviewing

Constellation’s application to determine whether it contains enough information to begin the

required formal review. If the application has sufficient information, the NRC will formally

docket, or file, the application and will announce an opportunity to request a hearing. 
A copy of the license renewal application for the Nine Mile Point units is available for

review at the Penfield Library (Selective Depository), Reference and Documents Department,

State University of New York, Oswego, N.Y., and on the NRC’s web site at

www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/nine-mile-pt.html 

#