alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12144. Applications

To request a grant under this part the chief local elected official of an area shall—

(1) prepare and submit to the Attorney General an application in such form, at such time, and in accordance with such procedures, as the Attorney General shall establish; and

(2) provide an assurance that funds received under this part shall be used to supplement, not supplant, non-Federal funds that would otherwise be available for programs funded under this part.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §30304, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1845.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13774 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
1

Hakos, Matthew

From: Curt Wells <cwells@aluminum.org>

Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:47 PM

To: Hakos, Matthew

Cc: Green, David A.; Putney, David

Subject: RE: MACT Supporting Documents

Matt –  

Thanks.  I will try to figure out why I could not access it directly.

Curt.

From: Hakos, Matthew [mailto:mhakos@rti.org] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:37 PM 

To: Curt Wells 

Cc: Green, David A.; Putney, David 

Subject: RE: MACT Supporting Documents 

Curt,  

Here is a link to the Primary Aluminum Docket:

http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2011‐0797

Click the “View All” button next to the “Supporting Documents” heading.  From here, you can search for specific

supporting documents.  

Here is a link to the file mentioned in your email:

http://www.regulations.gov/index.jsp#!documentDetail;D=EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2011‐0797‐0349

Matt Hakos

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

(919) 541‐6608

(919) 541‐7155 (fax)

From: Curt Wells [mailto:cwells@aluminum.org]  

Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 2:47 PM

To: Putney, David

Subject: MACT Supporting Documents

David – 
2

I am looking in the PMACT docket on www.regulations.gov for the document titled “Revised Draft MACT 

Floor Analysis for the Primary Aluminum Production Source Category” and cannot locate it. Frankly other 

documents that I expected to be there to support this re-proposal are also missing. Perhaps I am looking in the 

wrong place? Can you give me any guidance here as to how to access these materials? 

Curt Wells 

Manager, Regulatory Affairs 

The Aluminum Association 

(703) 358-2976 (w) 

(804) 385-6351 (c) 

cwells@aluminum.org
#### § 10400.4 Access to information.

The Office of the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator makes available information pertaining to matters issued, adopted, or promulgated by IPEC, that are within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2). Such “reading room” information is located at *https://www.whitehouse.gov/ipec.* Included in that information are IPEC's proactive disclosures. Proactive disclosures are records that have been requested three or more times, or that have been released to a requester and that IPEC determines have become, or are likely to become, the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records.
#### In the Matter of Jacob Freidus et al., Appellants. Central Heating Equipment Corp., Respondent.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Eva Levine, Appellant, against Michael J. Murphy, as Acting Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2009 (the Report), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    THAD M. BROWNThad M. Brown Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


March 12, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1403 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1403

 To remove the exemption with respect to Pakistan from the prohibition 
on assistance to a country whose elected head of government was deposed 
                      by decree or military coup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2003

 Mr. Pallone introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remove the exemption with respect to Pakistan from the prohibition 
on assistance to a country whose elected head of government was deposed 
                      by decree or military coup.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF EXEMPTION FROM PROHIBITION ON MILITARY 
              ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
authorize the President to exercise waivers of foreign assistance 
restrictions with respect to Pakistan through September 30, 2003, and 
for other purposes'', approved October 27, 2001 (Public Law 107-57), is 
repealed.
    (b) Applicability.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to all funds expended on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, and to any funds obligated before the date of the enactment of 
this Act that have not been expended as of such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER XXIII—DNA IDENTIFICATION GRANTS
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of
the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 26, 2003                                 /s/ JOHN LONG
                                                    ------------------
                                                    John Long
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
### §4236. Authorization of appropriations

Of the amounts authorized under section 4218(a) of this title, the Secretary of Commerce shall use up to $1,000,000 to carry out this part.

(Pub. L. 116–224, title I, §126, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1083.)
§ 430.304 SES performance management systems. ( a ) To encourage excellence in senior executive performance, each agency must develop and administer one or more performance management systems for its senior executives in accordance with the system standards established in § 430.305.
( b ) Performance management systems must provide for— ( 1 ) Identifying executives covered by the system;
( 2 ) Monitoring progress in accomplishing critical elements and performance requirements and conducting progress reviews at least once during the appraisal period, including informing executives on how well they are performing;
( 3 ) Establishing an official performance appraisal period for which an annual summary rating must be prepared;
( 4 ) Establishing a minimum appraisal period of at least 90 days;
( 5 ) Ending the appraisal period at any time after the minimum appraisal period is completed, but only if the agency determines there is an adequate basis on which to appraise and rate the senior executive's performance and the shortened appraisal period promotes effectiveness; and
( 6 ) Establishing criteria and procedures to address performance of senior executives who are on detail, temporarily reassigned, or transferred as described at § 430.312(c)(1), and for other special circumstances established by the agency.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 7279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTHONY JACKSON, a/k/a Loc , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:22

- cr - 00039

- BO

- 1; 7:23

- cv - 01233

- BO )

Submitted : April 18 , 2024 Decided: April 22, 2024

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER and THACKER , Circuit Judges

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Anthony Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7279 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/22/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 PER CURIAM: Anthony Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurist s could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing

. T he district court correctly concluded that Jackson’s claim that counsel was ineffective for advising him that he could plead guilty despite the appellate waiver in the plea was belied by the record as Jackson was advised of the waiver at the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing and agreed that he understood its terms. Therefore, Jackson failed to demonstrate that counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately USCA4 Appeal: 23-7279 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/22/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7279 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/22/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00203-CR

IN RE: CLYDE URA CAIN, SR.

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Clyde Ura Cain, Sr., proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asking 

this Court to direct the 228th Judicial District Court of Harris County1 to rule on his motion to 

compel the District Clerk of the 228th Judicial District Court to produce and make available to 

him the records from that court’s cause number 578,488. 

In his petition for writ of mandamus, Cain states his motion was placed in the mail on 

October 8, 2014. Cain alleges the trial court has neither acknowledged receipt of nor ruled on 

his motion. He, therefore, requests that this Court order the 228th Judicial District Court to rule 

on his motion. 

This Court has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or 

county court in the court of appeals district.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2004). 

The 228th Judicial District Court of Harris County is not within this Court’s district. We,

therefore, do not have mandamus jurisdiction over that court. Accordingly, we have no authority 

to consider Cain’s petition on its merits.

 1

Cain’s 1991 appeal from his conviction under trial court cause number 578,488 in the 228th Judicial District Court 

of Harris County was transferred from the First Court of Appeals to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant 

to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). That appeal has long since 

concluded. Cain does not currently have an appeal pending before this Court.
3

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: December 2, 2014

Date Decided: December 3, 2014

Do Not Publish
#### § 2472.10 Reports.

When a report is issued after a hearing conducted pursuant to § 2472.8 and 2472.9, it normally shall be in writing and shall be submitted to the Panel, with a copy to each party, within a period normally not to exceed 30 calendar days after the close of the hearing and receipt of briefs, if any.

[61 FR 41296, Aug. 8, 1996]
#### Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, Appellant, v. New Rochelle Trust Company, as Executor of Gertrude A. Alderdice, Deceased, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

*1022No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
§ 370.107 Details to small business concerns. ( a ) The head of each agency must take such actions as may be necessary to ensure that, of the details made to private sector organizations in each calendar year, at least 20 percent are to small business concerns, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3703(e)(1).
( b ) Agencies must round up to the nearest whole number when calculating the percentage of details to small business concerns needed to meet the requirements of this section. For example, if an agency detailed 11 individuals to private sector organizations during a given year, to meet the 20 percent requirement, that agency must have made at least 3 (rounded up from 2.2) of these details to small business concerns.
( c ) For purposes of this section, “year” refers to the 12-month period beginning on date of the enactment of the Act, December 17, 2002, and each succeeding 12-month period in which any assignments are made. Assignments “made” in a year are those commencing in such year, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3703(e)(2).
( d ) Agencies that do not meet the requirements of this section are subject to the reporting requirements in 5 U.S.C. 3703(e)(3).
( e ) An agency that makes fewer than five details to private sector organizations in any year is not subject to this section.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1      Section 906 Certification of CEO

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Armor Electric Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Merrill
Moses, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


By: /s/ Merrill Moses
    --------------------------------
Merrill Moses
President and CEO
February 15, 2005
#### Helen Weisfeld, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a fall on a sidewalk covered with ice and snow, defendant appeals by permission of this court from an order of the Appellate Term, Second Department, which affirms a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, First District, entered on a verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff. The accident occurred on December 25, 1948, barely five days after the termination of a snowstorm during which 16.7 inches of snow fell. Order and judgment reversed on the law and the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. In our opinion, plaintiff failed to establish any actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. (Cf. *Kirsch*v. *City of New York,*256 App. Div. 903, affd. 289 N. Y. 684, and *Leone*v. *City of New York,*263 App. Div. 888.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.2 - Mining Claim



Exhibit 10.2


	

PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
	

Ministry of Mines, Energy and Minerals

	

 
	

Division-Mineral Titles Branch




RECORD OF 2 POST CLAIM - MINERAL TENURE ACT


	

 
	

GREENWOOD
	

 
	

407537

	

 
	

Mining Division
	

 
	

Tenure No.

	

 
	

/s/ BD Henry
	

 
	

January 8, 2004

	

 
	

Gold Commissioner
	

 
	

Date of Record





APPLICATION TO RECORD A 2 POST CLAIM


I, Gerald Gallissant, Name of Locator, 783 MacCleave Ave, Penticton, British Columbia, V2A 3C4, (250) 492-2959, Client Number 109141, Agent for Sergei Stetsenko, 704 - 1155 Beach Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 1V2, (604) 605-0885, Client Number 136729, hereby apply for a record of a 2 post claim for the location as outlined on the attached copy of mineral titles reference map No. 82E 025, in the Greenwood Mining Division.


ACCESS


Describe how you gained access to the location; include references to roads, trails, topographic features, permanent landmarks and a description of the legal post location.


The IP is located 1300m west of the confluence of the Kelly and West Kettle Rivers. Access was gained by driving up Kelly River Road for approximately 5km.


GPS Co-ordinates taken of posts: Yes [ ] No [x] If yes, complete information chart on reverse.


TAG INFORMATION


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "INITIAL POST (No. 1)" to the post and impressed this information on the tag: 

 





TAG NO.  723608 M INITIAL POST (No. 1)


	

CLAIM NAME
	

COLBY 2

	

LOCATOR
	

Gerald Gallissant

	

AGENT FOR
	

Sergei Stetsenko

	

DATE COMMENCED
	

January 8, 2004

	

TIME COMMENCED
	

11:17 am

	

DIR. TO F.P.
	

270 degrees

	

METERS TO RIGHT
	

500 meters

	

METERS TO LEFT
	

0 meters





"Direction" means a bearing measured between 0 degrees and 360 degrees, where 0 degrees is the bearing of true north.


I have securely affixed the portion of the metal identification tag embossed "FINAL POST (No. 2)" to the final post (or the witness post) and impressed this information on the tag:


TAG NO.  723608 M FINAL POST (No. 2)


	

CLAIM NAME
	

COLBY 2

	

LOCATOR
	

Gerald Gallissant

	

AGENT FOR
	

Sergei Stetsenko

	

DIST. FROM I.P.
	

500 meters

	

DATE COMPLETED
	

January 8, 2004

	

TIME COMPLETED
	

12:21 pm




If witness post placed for final post: Bearing and distance from the witness post to the true position of the final post, exactly as written on the witness post:_______ degrees, _______ meters.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Mineral Tenure Act and Regulation pertaining to the location of 2 post claims and have attached a plan of the location on which the positions of the initial and final posts (and witness post if applicable) are indicated. The tag information supplied above is the identical information that I impressed upon the respective tags affixed to the applicable post when located this claim, and this information is true and correct. 


	

/s/ Gerald Gallissant
	

[FILE STAMP]

	

Signature of Locator
### §5511. Transfer of funds

#### (a) Transfer of unexpended appropriations for salaries and expenses

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon completion of the second fiscal year which begins after the end of the period during which amounts appropriated under any of the items under the heading "House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses" are available for obligation or expenditure, any such amounts which remain unobligated and unexpended shall be transferred to the heading "House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses, Allowances and Expenses" and shall be available until expended for purposes of House of Representatives Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery.

#### (b) Exception for Members' Representational Allowances

Subsection (a) does not apply to amounts appropriated under the heading "House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses, Members' Representational Allowances".

#### (c) Notification

The Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives shall notify the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives prior to the obligation or expenditure of any amounts transferred under subsection (a).

#### (d) Applicability

This section shall apply with respect to amounts appropriated for fiscal year 2018 or any succeeding fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 115–141, div. I, title I, §119, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 777.)
# L_2015170EN.01000101.xml

| 1.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis on the short-stay visa waiver

The Agreement between the European Community and the Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis on the short-stay visa waiver will enter into force on 1 August 2015, the procedure provided for in Article 8(1) of the Agreement having been completed on 3 June 2015.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Group Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Ronald A. Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date:   August 10, 2009 | /s/ Ronald A. Robinson                           |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Ronald A. Robinson                               |
|                              | President  & Chief Executive Officer

  |