alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 339.202 Medical standards. OPM may establish and/or approve medical standards for a Governmentwide occupation (*i.e.,* an occupation common to more than one agency) or approve revisions to its established medical standards. An individual agency may establish medical standards for positions that predominate in that agency (*i.e.,* where the agency has 50 percent or more of the positions in a particular occupation). Such standards must be justified on the basis that the duties of the positions are arduous or hazardous, or require a certain level of health status for successful performance when the nature of the positions involves a high degree of responsibility toward the public or sensitive national security concerns. The rationale for establishing the standard must be documented and supported by a study(ies) or evaluation(s) establishing the medical standard is job-related to the occupation(s). Medical standards established by agencies must be approved by OPM prior to implementation. Standards established by OPM or an agency must be: ( a ) Established by written directive and uniformly applied, and
( b ) Directly related to the actual performance and requirements necessary for the performance of the duties of the position.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Disaster Declaration #15742 and #15743; Florida Disaster Number FL-
00140


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4399-DR), dated 10/11/
2018.
    Incident: Hurricane Michael.
    Incident Period: 10/07/2018 through 10/19/2018.

DATES: Issued on 12/07/2018.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/17/2018.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/11/2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of FLORIDA, dated 10/11/2018, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 12/17/2018.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2018-27371 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1558-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 2004, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 28, 2004.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 20, 2004: Logan County for Individual Assistance (already designated for public assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-24706 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-167 December 22, 2005

NRC RENEWS POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT

OPERATING LICENSES FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 YEARS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has renewed the operating licenses of the Point Beach

Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, for an additional 20 years. 

The Point Beach plant is located in Two Rivers, Wis. The licensee, Nuclear Management Co.

LLC, submitted its license renewal application Feb. 25, 2004. With the renewal, the license for Unit 1

is extended to Oct. 5, 2030, and the license for Unit 2 is extended to March 8, 2033.

The NRC’s environmental review for this license renewal is described in a site-specific

supplement to the NRC’s “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear

Power Plants” (NUREG-1437, Supplement 23), issued in August. The review concluded there were no

environmental impacts that would preclude renewal of the licenses for environmental reasons. Public

meetings to discuss the environmental review were held near the plant on June 15, 2004, and March 3,

2005.

After carefully reviewing the plant’s safety systems and specifications, the staff concluded that

there were no safety concerns that would preclude license renewal, because the licensee had

demonstrated the capability to manage the effects of plant aging. The “Safety Evaluation Report

Related to the License Renewal of the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2” (NUREG-1839) was

published in December. In addition, NRC conducted inspections of the plants to verify information

submitted by the licensee. The reports relating to the Point Beach renewal are available on the NRC

Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/point-beach.html.

On Nov. 18, the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards – an independent body of

technical experts which advises the Commission – issued its recommendation that the operating

licenses for Point Beach be renewed. That recommendation is contained in “Report on the Safety

Aspects of the License Renewal Application for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.” This

document is available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/letters/2005/.
-2-

The Point Beach renewals bring the total number of renewals to 39 reactor units. A complete

listing of renewal applications can be found on the NRC Web site at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html.

###
### SUBCHAPTER IX—MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT PREVENTION
Amendment No. 3


 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
  
 Amendment No. 3 (this “Amendment”), dated and effective
as of November 13, 2002, between Salomon Brothers Realty Corp. (the “Lender”), NC Capital Corporation (the “Borrower”) and New Century Mortgage Corporation (the “Servicer”), of the Master Loan and Security Agreement,
dated April 1, 2000, among the Borrower, the Lender and the Servicer. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement. 
  
 1.    Amendment. 
  
 In
consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
  
 The definition of Maturity Date shall be amended as follows: 
  
 “Maturity Date” shall mean December 31, 2002, or such earlier date on which this Loan Agreement shall terminate in accordance with the provisions hereof or by operation of law. 
  
 2.    Counterparts. 
  
 This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which counterparts shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute but one and the same
instrument. 
  
 3.    Governing Law. 
  
 This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York and the obligations, rights and remedies of the parties hereunder shall be determined
in accordance with such laws. 
  
 4.    Severability of Provisions. 
  
 If any one or more of the covenants, agreements, provisions or terms of this Amendment for any reason whatsoever shall be held invalid,
then such covenants, agreements, provisions or terms shall be deemed severable from the remaining covenants, agreements, provisions or terms of this Amendment and shall in no way affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions of this
Amendment. 
  
 5.    Successors and Assigns. 
  
 The provisions of this Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 






  
 6.    Articles and Section Headings. 
  
 The article and section headings herein are for convenience of reference only, and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof.







  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Lender the Borrower and the Servicer have caused their
names to be signed hereto by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, this 13th day of
November, 2002. 
  
 
	 SALOMON BROTHERS REALTY CORP. 
 as Lender
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    MATTHEW R. BOLLO
 

	  	 	 Name:
 Title:  Authorized
Agent
 

 
  
  
 
	 NC CAPITAL CORPORATION
 as Borrower
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    KEVIN CLOYD
 

	  	 	 Name:
 Title:  President
 

 
  
  
 
	 NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION 
 as Servicer
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    KEVIN CLOYD
 

	  	 	 Name:
 Title: Senior Vice
President
### §426g–1. State and regional plans

The Secretary may—

(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation of a comprehensive State or regional plan for the conservation of coastal resources located within the boundaries of the State;

(2) encourage State participation in the implementation of the plan; and

(3) submit to Congress reports and recommendations with respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out the plan.

(Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, §4, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §227(d)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4 of act Aug. 13, 1946, was renumbered section 5 of that act, and was classified to section 426h of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303.
### §10465. Definitions and grant conditions

In this subchapter the definitions and grant conditions in section 12291 of this title shall apply.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2106, formerly §2105, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40231(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1933; amended Pub. L. 106–386, div. B, title I, §1109(a)(2), Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1503; Pub. L. 109–162, §3(c)(2), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2972; renumbered §2106, Pub. L. 117–103, div. W, title XV, §1506(1), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796hh–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2106 of Pub. L. 90–351 was classified to section 3796hh–5 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–271, §2(f)(2), Aug. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 752.

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–162 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of pars. (1) to (3) defining for purposes of this subchapter "domestic violence", "protection order", and "dating violence".

2000—Par. (3). Pub. L. 106–386 added par. (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 117–103 not effective until Oct. 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after Mar. 15, 2022, see section 4(a) of div. W of Pub. L. 117–103, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6851 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
#### Michael Bittins, Appellee, v. Calumet & South Chicago Railway Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 19,353.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Henry V. Freeman, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the March term, 1913.

Reversed.

Opinion filed May 4, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Michael Bittins against Calumet *&*South Chicago Railway Company to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while attempting to board one of defendant’s cars. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Warner H. Robinson and William C. McHenry, for appellant; Leonard A. Busby, of counsel.

R. J. Finn, for appellee.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols, XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

*139Abstract of the Decision.

Carriers, § *476*
      ***
      *—when recovery for injuries sustained while aP tempting to hoard a street car not sustained hy the evidence.*In an action against a street railway company for injuries alleged to have resulted from the negligence of the defendant in starting a car when plaintiff attempted to hoard it, a judgment for plaintiff *held*not sustained hy the evidence, it appearing that the plaintiff’s evidence was conflicting and unsatisfactory and a number of witnesses for the defendant testified that the car was in motion when plaintiff attempted to board the same.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1771

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit knowingly misinforming the relative of a member of the Armed Forces of the United 

States that such member is deceased, injured, or missing due to an 

event associated with their military service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Mr. MCCOTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prohibit knowingly misinforming the relative of a member of the 

Armed Forces of the United States that such member 

is deceased, injured, or missing due to an event associated with their military service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION. 

4 Section 223(a)(1) of the Communications Act of 

5 1934 (47 U.S.C. 223(a)(1)) is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

7 (D); and 
2

•HR 1771 IH 

1 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol2 lowing new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(F) makes a telephone call or initiates a 

4 communication with a telecommunications de5 vice with the intended purpose of knowingly 

6 misinforming the relative of a member of the 

7 Armed Forces of the United States (including 

8 a member of the National Guard on active serv9 ice) that such member is deceased, injured, or 

10 missing due to an event associated with their 

11 military service; or’’.

Æ
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0219 - Final Rulemaking to Revise 10 CFR 73.1, Design Basis Threat (DBT) Requirements

Accession Number: ML062130289

Date Released: Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML062130442 - SECY-06-0219 - Final Rulemaking to Revise 10 CFR 73.1, Design Basis Threat (DBT) Requirements (7 page(s), 10/30/2006)
    - ML062130301 - SECY-06-0219 - Enclosure 1 - Final Rule on Design Basis Threat (70 page(s), 10/30/2006)
    - ML062130546 - SECY-06-0219 - Enclosure 2 - Regulatory Analysis of Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 73.1- Design Basis Threat (11 page(s), 9/1/2006)
    - ML062130553 - SECY-06-0219 - Enclosure 3 - Environmental Assessment Supporting Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 73.1- Design Basis Threat (10 page(s), 9/1/2006)
    - ML062130575 - SECY-06-0219 - Enclosure 4 - Summary of Public Comments on Proposed Design Basis Threat (DBT) 10 CFR 73.1 (32 page(s), 10/30/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### Part K—Strengthening America's Families by Preventing Violence Against Women and Children
§ 410.201 Responsibilities of the head of an agency. Agency employee development plans and programs should be designed to build or support an agency workforce capable of achieving agency mission and performance goals and facilitating continuous improvement of employee and organizational performance. In developing strategies to train employees, heads of agencies or their designee(s), under section 4103 of title 5, United States Code, and Executive Order 11348, are required to: ( a ) Establish, budget for, operate, maintain, and evaluate plans and programs for training agency employees by, in, and through Government or non-Government facilities, as appropriate;
( b ) Establish policies governing employee training, including a statement of the alignment of employee training and development with agency strategic plans, the assignment of responsibility to ensure the training goals are achieved, and the delegation of training approval authority to the lowest appropriate level;
( c ) Establish priorities for training employees and allocate resources according to those priorities; and
( d ) Develop and maintain plans and programs that: ( 1 ) Identify mission-critical occupations and competencies;
( 2 ) Identify workforce competency gaps;
( 3 ) Include strategies for closing competency gaps; and
( 4 ) Assess periodically, but not less often than annually, the overall agency talent management program to identify training needs within the agency as required by section 303 of Executive Order 11348.
[74 FR 65387, Dec. 10, 2009]
§ 531.222 Rates of basic pay that may be used as the highest previous rate. ( a ) ( 1 ) Subject to the conditions in this section and § 531.223, the highest previous rate used in applying § 531.221 is— ( i ) The highest rate of basic pay previously received by an individual while employed in a civilian position in any part of the Federal Government (including service with the government of the District of Columbia for employees first employed by that government before October 1, 1987), without regard to whether the position was in the GS pay system; or
( ii ) The highest rate of basic pay in effect when a GS employee held his or her highest GS grade and highest step within that grade.
( 2 ) The highest previous rate must be a rate of basic pay received by an employee while serving on a regular tour of duty— ( i ) Under an appointment not limited to 90 days or less; or
( ii ) For a continuous period of not less than 90 days under one or more appointments without a break in service.
( b ) For periods of service as a GS employee, the highest previous rate may not be a special rate, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section. If the highest previous rate is a locality rate, the underlying GS rate or an LEO special base rate associated with that locality rate must be used as the highest previous rate in applying § 531.221(b).
( c ) An agency may use a GS employee's special rate established under 5 U.S.C. 5305 and 5 CFR part 530, subpart C, or 38 U.S.C. 7455 as the highest previous rate when all of the following conditions apply: ( 1 ) The employee is reassigned to another position in the same agency at the same grade level;
( 2 ) The special rate is the employee's rate of basic pay immediately before the reassignment; and
( 3 ) An authorized agency official finds that the need for the services of the employee, and the employee's contribution to the program of the agency, will be greater in the position to which reassigned. An agency must make such determinations on a case-by-case basis. In each case, the agency must document the determination to use the special rate as an employee's highest previous rate in writing.
( d ) When an agency is barred from using a special rate established under 5 U.S.C. 5305 and 5 CFR part 530, subpart C, or 38 U.S.C. 7455 as an employee's highest previous rate under § 531.223(g), the agency must consider a special rate employee's underlying GS rate (or LEO special base rate, if applicable) in determining the employee's highest previous rate for the purpose of applying paragraph (b) of this section.
[70 FR 31291, May 31, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 74995, Dec. 19, 2005]