alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GAO-01-1093R Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc.

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

August 21, 2001

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr.

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

 Report for the Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc., for Fiscal Year 2000

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc., a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal

year ended February 29, 2000. The corporation’s purpose is to assist Vietnam-era

veterans and their families.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

! present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

! obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

! submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-1093R Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc.

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(194067)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C HR I S T OP HE R P AU L HA WK, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 07- 30067 D . C . N o . C R -0 1 -0 5 2 1 8 -0 0 1 -R JB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtJ . B ry a n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an d C A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C hr i s t ophe rP aul H a w k appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de c i s i on on r e m a nd pur s ua ntt o U

ni te d State s v . A m e l i ne , 40 9 F . 3d 10 73 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( en banc), that i tw oul d notha ve i m pos e d am a t e r i a l l ydi f f e r e nts e nt e nc e ha d i tknow n tha tthe S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s w e r e a dvi s ory . P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 3 8 6 U . S. 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 30067 2 73 8 (19 67 ), H aw k’ s c ou nsel has f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appel l antw i th the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent al bri ef and H aw k h as f i l e d as uppl e m e nt a l br i e f . N o a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. H a w k ’s r e q u e s t f

o rn e w c o u n s e l is d e n ie d . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cco rd i n g l y, co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-039 August 11, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

TO SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Alan J.

Blamey as the NRC senior resident inspector at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. He

joins NRC Resident Inspector Frederick Jaxheimer at the two-unit site, in Berwick, Pa. Blamey

replaces Sam Hansell who was reassigned as the senior resident inspector at the Limerick

Generating Station in Sanatoga, Pa.

"Alan Blamey’s experience coupled with his commitment to safety will help the NRC in

its mission to ensure that Susquehanna continues to meet the high standards we insist upon for

reactor operation in the United States," said Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

Blamey first joined the NRC in September 1997 as a reactor engineer in the Region I

Office. He was assigned as an NRC resident inspector at the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station

in July 1998. In June 2001, he was promoted to senior operations engineer in the Regional

Office.

Prior to joining the NRC, Blamey worked as a technical engineer and NRC-licensed

senior reactor operator at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, located near Moline, Ill. He held

various leadership positions in engineering and operations during his thirteen years with

Commonwealth Edison.

Blamey is a graduate of Pennsylvania State University, where he earned a bachelor’s

degree in nuclear engineering with a minor in mathematics.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve

as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The Susquehanna resident inspectors

can be reached at 570/542-2134.

###
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137356

DE ANNA R. ELLIS CHOPIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137356 COA: 285625 Berrien CC: 07-000124-CZ RIVERWOOD CENTER, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
#### § 319.201 Coverage.

This section applies to SL positions in an executive agency per 5 U.S.C. 5108 and ST positions in any agency per 5 U.S.C. 3104.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-51783) pertaining to the Denali Incorporated 1997 Incentive Stock
Option Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91947) pertaining
to the Denali Incorporated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated
September 29, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Denali Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended July 1, 2000.


                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
October 12, 2000
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT


I, T.M. “Roe” Patterson, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Basic Energy Services, Inc.; and


2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





/s/ T.M. “Roe” Patterson T.M. “Roe” Patterson  Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 6, 2017
### §1418. Diligence requirements

#### (a) In general

The exploration plan or recovery plan and the terms, conditions, and restrictions of each license and permit issued under this subchapter shall be designed to assure diligent development. Each licensee shall pursue diligently the activities described in the exploration plan of the licensee, and each permittee shall pursue diligently the activities described in the recovery plan of the permittee.

#### (b) Expenditures

Each license shall require such periodic reasonable expenditures for exploration by the licensee as the Administrator shall establish, taking into account the size of the area of the deep seabed to which the exploration plan associated with the license applies and the amount of funds which is estimated by the Administrator to be required for commercial recovery of hard mineral resources to begin within the time limit established by the Administrator. Such required expenditures shall not be established at a level which would discourage exploration by persons with less costly technology than is prevalently in use.

#### (c) Commercial recovery

Once commercial recovery is achieved, the Administrator shall, within reasonable limits and taking into consideration all relevant factors, require the permittee to maintain commercial recovery throughout the period of the permit; except that the Administrator shall for good cause shown, including force majeure, adverse economic conditions, or other circumstances beyond the control of the permittee, authorize the temporary suspension of commercial recovery activities. The duration of such a suspension shall not exceed one year at any one time, unless the Administrator determines that conditions justify an extension of the suspension.

(Pub. L. 96–283, title I, §108, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 567.)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00302-CV

In re Estate of Roosevelt Green, Sr., Deceased

On Appeal from the

County Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR18-0026

JUDGMENT

The Court’s judgment issued on December 2, 2021, is hereby withdrawn and the 

following is substituted therefor. 

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 3, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2009 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


March 12, 2009
#### § 1632.3 Conduct of agency business.

Members shall not jointly conduct or dispose of official Board business other than in accordance with this part.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1519

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reauthorize the State 

Criminal Alien Assistance Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2003

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. FARR, Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma, 

Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. FROST, Mr. 

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. DOOLEY of California, Mr. ISSA, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to 

reauthorize the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SCAAP REAUTHORIZED. 

4 Section 241(i) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)) is amended—

6 (1) by amending paragraph (4)(A) to read as 

7 follows: 
2

•HR 1519 IH 

1 ‘‘(4)(A) In carrying out paragraph (1), the Sec2 retary of Homeland Security shall give priority to—

3 ‘‘(i) Federal incarceration of undocu4 mented criminal aliens who have committed ag5 gravated felonies; and 

6 ‘‘(ii) compensating States, and political 

7 subdivisions of States—

8 ‘‘(I) located on a border of the United 

9 States with Canada or Mexico; or 

10 ‘‘(II) having one of the fifth largest 

11 populations of aliens who are not author12 ized to be present in the United States.’’; 

13 and 

14 (2) by amending paragraph (5) to read as fol15 lows: 

16 ‘‘(5) There are authorized to be appropriated 

17 $750,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2004 through 

18 2008 to carry out this subsection.’’.

Æ
§ 2100.12 Accounting of disclosure. ( a ) The AFRH or agency will maintain a record of disclosures in cases where records about the individual are disclosed from a system of records except— ( 1 ) When the disclosure is made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended; or
( 2 ) When the disclosure is made to those officers and employees of the AFRH who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties.
( b ) This accounting of the disclosures will be retained for a least 5 years or for the life of the record, whichever is longer, and will contain the following information: ( 1 ) A brief description of the record disclosed;
( 2 ) The date, nature, and purpose for the disclosure; and,
( 3 ) The name and address of the person, agency, or other entity to whom the disclosure is made.
( c ) Except for the accounting of disclosure made to agencies, individuals, or entities in law enforcement activities or disclosures made from the AFRH exempt systems of records, the accounting of disclosures will be made available to the data subject upon request in accordance with the access procedures of this part.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002
(the "Report"), I, Gerald A. Moore, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company.



                                         /s/ Gerald A. Moore
                                         --------------------------
                                         Gerald A. Moore
                                         Chairman of the Board and
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                         November 13, 2002
### §2734. Vessel traffic service system

The Secretary of Transportation shall within one year after August 18, 1990—

(1) acquire, install, and operate such additional equipment (which may consist of radar, closed circuit television, satellite tracking systems, or other shipboard dependent surveillance), train and locate such personnel, and issue such final regulations as are necessary to increase the range of the existing VTS system in the Port of Valdez, Alaska, sufficiently to track the locations and movements of tank vessels carrying oil from the Trans-Alaska Pipeline when such vessels are transiting Prince William Sound, Alaska, and to sound an audible alarm when such tankers depart from designated navigation routes; and

(2) submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report on the feasibility and desirability of instituting positive control of tank vessel movements in Prince William Sound by Coast Guard personnel using the Port of Valdez, Alaska, VTS system, as modified pursuant to paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 101–380, title V, §5004, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 553; Pub. L. 107–295, title IV, §408(b)(2), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2002—Par. (2). Pub. L. 107–295 substituted "Transportation and Infrastructure" for "Merchant Marine and Fisheries".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to therequirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J.Baker, Chief Financial Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”),hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which this certificationis attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

**In Witness Whereof**,the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 5th day of May, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ Nancy J. Baker                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

 Thiscertification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemedfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporatedby reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made beforeor after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

 

----
§ 2100.7 Request for correction or amendment. ( a ) Requests to correct or amend a file shall be addressed to the system manager in which the file is located. The request must reasonably describe the record to be amended, the items to be changed as specifically as possible, the type of amendment (e.g., deletion, correction, amendment), and the reason for the amendment. The request should also include the reasons why the requester believes the record is not accurate, relevant, timely, or complete. The burden of proof will be upon the individual to furnish sufficient facts to persuade the change of the record of the inaccuracy, irrelevancy, timeliness, or incompleteness of the record. Normally all documents submitted, to include court orders, shall be certified. Amendments under this part are limited to correcting factual matters and not matters of official judgement or opinions.
( b ) Requirements of identification as outlined in § 2100.4 apply to requests to correct or amend a file.
( c ) Incomplete requests shall not be honored, but the requester shall be contacted for the additional information needed to process the request.
( d ) The amendment process is not intended to permit the alteration of evidence presented in the course of judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings. Any amendments or changes to these records normally are made through the specific procedures established for the amendment of such records.
( e ) When records sought to be amended are actually covered by another issuance, the administrative procedures under that issuance must be exhausted before using the procedures under the Privacy Act.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Pugsley Chiropractic, PLLC, as Assignee of Marva Lewis, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Darya Klein, Esq.), for appellant.Jeffery Miller &amp; Associates (Stacia Ury, Esq.), for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Katherine A. Levine, J.), entered January 30, 2015. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Village Med. Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Stephane Philogene v Citiwide Auto Leasing Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-962 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: December 22, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Joseph T. Picciola, Doing Business as J. P. Construction Co., Defendant, and Excelsior Construction Corp., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.