alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation

Complete when issuing a supplemental NPRM, revision, or supersedure. [8] No Change from existing AD action Dock" No. 

## FAA-l-OIO- 

# GOLlo? :2001- A/vI

# -tJ/O-AP Directorate Identifier:

- AD Estimated Costs: Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft. engine, Action propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cas! Total Costs Number of TOlalCost replacement) (include cost (labor io- U.S. for

## u.s. Fleel

access, testing, (@S85/h parts) Registered and close-up)' our) Products



### S ().(X) 

### ~ 0.00 1$0·00 

## I



# , • 

# ,

.

# , •

• 

# ., '/ 

# . .

, 

# , I i I I

The known number of oroducls in comoliancc: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. 

### nee!: S 0 Costs covered under wurmntv (ifknown) 

### S Special considerations forEconomic Analysis (Use Ihi~·fieldto explain anything in the £Stimmed Co~-ts fablefhat was assumed or might/lotbe obvious. This field callalso be used 10explain warranty COSIS): 

### Executive Ordcr 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

### YES· 

## 0 NO

## fZ} ·Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies :l1ld 

### Proce.dures: Is the AD significant? •. 

# YEs'D ND 

## I3J "'Explanation:

### Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Willlhc AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer, ,~, YES 

# 0 NO 

# I2J Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska where aviation mightbe.the only mode oftrailspOrtation? • YES' 

# 0 NO 

# I2J
*Explanation:
|  | Login |Subscribe/Register |Manage Account |Shopping Cart |Help | Contact Us | Home      |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |  |
|--|--|
#### § 582.401 Aggregate disposable earnings.

In accordance with the Consumer Credit Protection Act, the *aggregate disposable earnings* under this part are the employee-obligor's pay less those amounts excluded in accordance with § 582.103.
#### John Kidd, as Executor, etc., of George W. Wait, Deceased, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., dissented.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-066 May 30, 2002

 NRC TO MEET WITH FIRSTENERGY NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. JUNE 4

 TO DISCUSS REPLACEMENT OF DAVIS-BESSE REACTOR VESSEL HEAD

 The staff of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet June 4 with representatives from

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company to discuss replacement of the reactor pressure vessel head at

the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.

 The meeting will be held from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the Commissioners’ Conference Room in

the agency’s One White Flint North Building, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The meeting

will be open to the public for observation and NRC officials will be available before the meeting

adjourns to answer any questions. The meeting contacts are Stephen Sands at (301) 415-3154 and

Douglas Pickett at (301) 415-1364. 

 Interested individuals may listen to the meeting via telephone by calling: (888) 390-5922 and

entering passcode 1234 at the prompt. One hundred and fifty phone lines will be available. 

 The plant, located at Oak Harbor, Ohio, shut down February 16 for refueling and maintenance.

Inspections revealed a cavity in the top of the reactor pressure vessel head that was likely caused by

corrosion from boric acid. The NRC sent an Augmented Inspection Team to the site to gather

information regarding the degradation to the reactor pressure vessel head and issued a bulletin

requesting prompt information from all of its pressurized water reactor licensees on vessel head

inspections. An exit meeting to discuss the team’s findings was held in Oak Harbor, Ohio, on April 5.

 To help keep the public informed of its activities, NRC has established a section on its web site

where information about reactor pressure vessel head degradation is posted and updated, including press

releases, correspondence with NRC licensees and other related documents. The web address is:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html

###
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04762

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04762\04762_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04762\04762_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04762\04762_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04762\04762_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04762\04762_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04762\Supporting Documentation\04762_Arial Map.pdf.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04762\Supporting Documentation\04762_Water Balance.pdf.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04762\Supporting Documentation\04762_Water Balance2.pdf.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04762\04762_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04762\04762_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of James E. Albright, Deceased, Edith E. Albright, Appellant; William W. Albright, as Executor of James E. Albright, Deceased, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, which granted the executor’s motion to direct appellant *717to execute certain quitclaim deeds, pursuant to a settlement agreement, and which denied appellant’s cross motion to set aside the settlement agreement without prejudice to the institution of proper proceedings. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to both parties, payable out of the estate, and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for a hearing and determination as to the validity and effect of the settlement agreement, including appellant’s right to have same vacated and set aside. The agreement was made to settle a proceeding brought to determine the validity of a notice of election under section 18 of the Decedent Estate Law, filed by appellant, claiming to be decedent’s widow. The Surrogate’s Court has plenary jurisdiction to make a full, equitable and complete disposition of all the issues presented in that proceeding, including the question of whether the settlement agreement was binding and effective. (Cf. *Matter of Frame,*128 Mise. 788, 234 App. Div. 748, and *Matter of Sand,*178 Mise. 179.) Any factual issues raised by the various affidavits may be determined after a hearing. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-014 June 6, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR NAMED AT SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Arlington, Texas, have selected John Dixon

as the new senior resident inspector at the South Texas Project nuclear plant.

South Texas Project operates the plant near Bay City, Texas. The NRC has two

inspectors assigned to the plant, which has two reactors. Dixon joins Resident Inspector Joe

Taylor. He replaces Jeff Cruz, who accepted a position at NRC Headquarters in Bethesda,

Maryland.

“John Dixon’s experience and commitment to safety will help the NRC ensure that South

Texas Project conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect the public health

and safety,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett.

Dixon joined the NRC in 2002 as a reactor engineer and project engineer in the Division

of Reactor Projects. He is currently a resident inspector at Arkansas Nuclear One, where he has

worked since 2003. He has a Bachelor’s degree and a Master’s degree in nuclear engineering

from Texas A&M University. Before joining the NRC, Dixon worked for Bettis Atomic Power

Laboratory where he achieved Submarine Engineer qualifications and taught Naval Nuclear

Propulsion in Charleston, S.C. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections and

monitoring significant work projects.

The South Texas Project resident inspectors can be reached at: 361-972-2507.

###
## •|ff»|J^f-'|f.ft|»»M'',,.flH(llll'/'[|'l'i»''l'IMl''

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

# 133M Xnh^hal fltf^ °°Bft 

## officialIuMIess STATE PENALTY* 

# PRIVATE USE g| 0.11. 

### RE: WR-82,467-01 STANLEY ORSON MOZEE 

# RETURN TO SENDER 

# £$> \P

-t+

# A 

# D^Tx^ NOTIN DALLAS COUNTY JAIL
7S1 v

3 PITNEY BOWES 

## 02 ir $ 00.40s 0002003152 FEB05 2015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 78 701
#### Adolf Mandel, Appellant, v. David Hopkins and William Hopkins, as Executors, etc., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 03-137 October 29, 2003

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

TO HOLD NOVEMBER MEETING IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting November 5-8 in Rockville, Md. The committee will discuss, among other items, the

Early Site Permit review standard and a framework for licensing advanced non-light water reactors.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. The meeting will begin at 10:30 a.m. on November 5, and at 8:30 a.m. the

succeeding days. The meeting will be open to the public, except for the following sessions, which will

be closed to discuss safeguards and security issues:

November 5, 12:30 p.m. - 7 p.m.;

November 6, 6 p.m. - 7 p.m. (to be closed if a security-related report is discussed), and;

November 7, 2:15 p.m. - 7 p.m. (to be closed if a security-related report is discussed).

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2003/ .

For additional information, please contact Dr. Sher Bahadur, at 301-415-7362.

###
### §3357. Financial and administrative controls relating to fraud and improper payments

(a) Definition.—In this section, the term "agency" has the meaning given the term in section 551 of title 5.

(b) Guidelines.—The guidelines required to be established under section 3(a) of the Fraud Reduction and Data Analytics Act of 2015, as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this section—

(1) shall continue to be in effect on and after the date of enactment of this section; and

(2) may be periodically modified by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Comptroller General of the United States, as the Director and Comptroller General may determine necessary.

(c) Requirements for Controls.—The guidelines described in subsection (b) shall include—

(1) conducting an evaluation of fraud risks and using a risk-based approach to design and implement financial and administrative control activities to mitigate identified fraud risks;

(2) collecting and analyzing data from reporting mechanisms on detected fraud to monitor fraud trends and using that data and information to continuously improve fraud prevention controls; and

(3) using the results of monitoring, evaluation, audits, and investigations to improve fraud prevention, detection, and response.

(d) Report.—For each of fiscal years 2019 and 2020, each agency shall submit to Congress, as part of the annual financial report of the agency, a report of the agency on—

(1) implementing—

(A) the financial and administrative controls described in subsection (b);

(B) the fraud risk principle in the Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government published by the Government Accountability Office (commonly known as the "Green Book"); and

(C) Office of Management and Budget Circular A–123, or any successor thereto, with respect to the leading practices for managing fraud risk;

(2) identifying risks and vulnerabilities to fraud, including with respect to payroll, beneficiary payments, grants, large contracts, and purchase and travel cards; and

(3) establishing strategies, procedures, and other steps to curb fraud.

(Added Pub. L. 116–117, §2(a), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 131.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 3(a) of the Fraud Reduction and Data Analytics Act of 2015, referred to in subsec. (b), is section 3(a) of Pub. L. 114–186, June 30, 2016, 130 Stat. 546, which was formerly set out in a note under section 3321 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 116–117, §3(a)(4), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 133.

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec. (b), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 116–117, which was approved Mar. 2, 2020.
### §11298. Authority of Inspectors General

#### (a) In general

An Inspector General appointed under section 403 or 415 of title 5 may authorize staff to assist the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children—

(1) by conducting reviews of inactive case files to develop recommendations for further investigations; and

(2) by engaging in similar activities.

#### (b) Limitations

#### (1) Priority

An Inspector General may not permit staff to engage in activities described in subsection (a) if such activities will interfere with the duties of the Inspector General under chapter 4 of title 5.

#### (2) Funding

No additional funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXVII, §3703, as added Pub. L. 110–344, §9, Oct. 7, 2008, 122 Stat. 3936; amended Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(59), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5780a of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

Section was enacted as part of the Crime Control Act of 1990, and not as part of the Missing Children's Assistance Act which comprises this subchapter, nor as part of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(59)(A), substituted "section 403 or 415 of title 5" for "section 3 or 8G of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 117–286, §4(b)(59)(B), substituted "chapter 4 of title 5." for "the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.)."
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0074 - "Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005"

Accession Number: ML060590188

Date Released: Monday, April 17, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML060590185 - SECY-06-0074 - "Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2005" (12 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590197 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 1 - Performance Indicator Program Evaluation (9 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590206 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 2 - Inspection Program Evaluation (6 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590212 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 3 - Significance Determination Process Evaluation (6 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590218 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 4 - Assessment Program Evaluation (4 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590221 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 5 - Status of Implementation Issues (5 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590226 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 6 - Reactor Oversight Process Communication and Training Activities (5 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590233 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 7 - Regulatory Impact Summary (4 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590236 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 8 - Reactor Oversight Process Resources (8 page(s), 3/31/2006)
    - ML060590243 - SECY-06-0074 - Attachment 9 - Resident Inspector Demographics and Site Staffing (5 page(s), 3/31/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 2414.2 Unauthorized communications. ( a ) No interested person outside this agency shall, in any agency proceeding subject to 5 U.S.C. 557(a), make or knowingly cause to be made any prohibited ex parte communication to any Authority member, Administrative Law Judge, or other Authority employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be involved in the decisional process of the proceeding.
( b ) No Authority member, Administrative Law Judge, or other Authority employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be involved in the decisional process of the proceeding relevant to the merits of the proceeding shall: ( 1 ) Request any prohibited ex parte communications; or
( 2 ) make or knowingly cause to be made any prohibited ex parte communications about the proceeding to any interested person outside this agency relevant to the merits of the proceeding.
#### § 731.401 Scope.

This subpart covers agency-initiated suitability actions against an *applicant* or *appointee.*
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                   ------------
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Mel Hooper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  issuer's  other  certifying   officer(s)  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e)  for the  issuer  and  have:  (a)  Designed  such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure  controls and
procedures  to be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to ensure  that  material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being  prepared;  (b)  Evaluated  the  effectives of the
issuer's  disclosure  controls and  procedures  and presented in this report our
conclusions about the  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's  internal  control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant  deficiencies
and material  weaknesses  in the design or  operation  of internal  control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees
who have a  significant  role in the issuer's  internal  control over  financial
reporting.

/s/ Mel Hooper
-------------------------
Mel Hooper
President
August __, 2003
### §10158. Interest-bearing trust funds

#### (a) Trust fund required

A State or unit of local government shall establish a trust fund in which to deposit amounts received under this part.

#### (b) Expenditures

#### (1) In general

Each amount received under this part (including interest on such amount) shall be expended before the date on which the grant period expires.

#### (2) Repayment

A State or unit of local government that fails to expend an entire amount (including interest on such amount) as required by paragraph (1) shall repay the unexpended portion to the Attorney General not later than 3 months after the date on which the grant period expires.

#### (3) Reduction of future amounts

If a State or unit of local government fails to comply with paragraphs (1) and (2), the Attorney General shall reduce amounts to be provided to that State or unit of local government accordingly.

#### (c) Repaid amounts

Amounts received as repayments under this section shall be subject to section 10108 of this title as if such amounts had not been granted and repaid. Such amounts shall be deposited in the Treasury in a dedicated fund for use by the Attorney General to carry out this part. Such funds are hereby made available to carry out this part.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §507, as added Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1111(a)(2)(C), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3757 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 507 of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6091(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4335, related to designation and purposes of a State office, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1111(a)(1), (d), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3094, 3102, applicable with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after Jan. 5, 2006, and each fiscal year thereafter.

Another prior section 507 of Pub. L. 90–351, title I, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 205; Pub. L. 93–83, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 211; Pub. L. 94–503, title I, §§119(b), 121, Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2417, 2418, related to officers, employees, and hearing examiners, prior to the general amendment of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 96–157.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after Jan. 5, 2006, and each fiscal year thereafter, see section 1111(d) of Pub. L. 109–162, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 10151 of this title.