alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

 

)

KEIRON M. ELIAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 23-0986 (UNA)

)

SCOTT S. HARRIS, )

)

Defendant. )

___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s applications for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis (ECF Nos. 2, 11) and her pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court will grant the 

applications and, for the reasons discussed below, dismiss the complaint.

Plaintiff brings this action against the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court. Compl. 

(ECF No. 1) at 2 (page numbers designated by CM/ECF). She alleges she submitted a petition 

for writ of certiorari and appellate brief, which defendant rejected as untimely filed. See id. at 4-

5. Plaintiff does not demand monetary damages; she “seeks injunctive relief ordering defendant 

to file [her] opening Appellate Brief and evidence in support of claims in Appeal[.]” Id. at 3; see 

id. at 5.

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is the designated recipient of all documents submitted to

the Supreme Court and is authorized to reject any filing that does not comply with applicable 

rules and orders. See Sup. Ct. R. 1. This Court has no authority to determine what action, if any, 

must be taken by the Supreme Court and its administrative officers. See Nixon v. Barnes, 799 F. 

App’x 5 (D.C. Cir. 2020) (“Insofar as appellant sought declaratory relief against an employee of 

the Supreme Court Clerk’s office, the district court lacked authority to grant such relief.”); Miller 
2

v. Harris, 599 F. App’x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (“The district court correctly determined it lacked 

jurisdiction to review decisions of the United States Supreme Court, including those of its Clerk 

of Court.”); In re Marin, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam) (concluding that the 

Supreme Court “has inherent supervisory authority over its Clerk,” and “neither a district court 

nor a circuit court of appeals has jurisdiction to interfere with it by mandamus or otherwise”); 

Bishay v. Harris, No. 21-cv-1831, 2022 WL 612609, at *2 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2022) (concluding 

district court has no authority “to declare the clerks’ routine processing of a stay application to be 

fraudulent, criminal, and in violation of the Constitution” because granting such relief “would 

directly trench on the Supreme Court’s exclusive supervisory authority”), aff’d, No. 22-5060, 

2022 WL 3449223 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 11, 2022). 

An Order is issued separately.

DATE: July 17, 2023 TREVOR N. McFADDEN

United States District Judge
§ 300.706 Office of Personnel Management adjudication. ( a ) OPM will determine whether failure to register was knowing and willful when an individual has requested a decision and presented a written explanation, as described in § 300.705. The Associate Director for Career Entry or his or her designee will make the determination based on the written explanation provided by the individual. The burden of proof will be on the individual to show by a preponderance of the evidence that failure to register was neither knowing nor willful.
( b ) OPM may consult with the Selective Service System in making determinations.
( c ) The Associate Director for Career Entry or his or her designee will notify the individual and the agency in writing of the determination. The determination is final unless reconsidered at the discretion of the Associate Director. There is no further right to administrative review.
( d ) The Director of OPM may reopen and reconsider a determination.
( e ) The Director of OPM may, at his or her discretion, delegate to an executive agency the authority to make initial determinations. However, OPM may review any initial determination and make a final adjudication in any case. If a delegation is made under this paragraph, the notice in § 300.705(d)(1) will state that the individual may submit a written request that OPM review the agency's initial determination. The agency will forward to OPM copies of all documents relating to the individual's failure to register, including the individual's request for review and his explanation of his failure to register.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Tell-A-Tale Incorporated (the "Company")on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the        Company.
/s/Anthony N.DeMint                            

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

February6, 2004
#### In the Matter of Ruzicka’s, a Partnership, Respondent, against Greenhouse Flower Cooperative, Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### § 4101.109 Waivers.

The DAEO may grant a written waiver from any provision of this part based on a determination that the waiver is not inconsistent with part 2635 of this title or otherwise prohibited by law and that, under the particular circumstances, application of the provision is not necessary to avoid the appearance of misuse of position or loss of impartiality, or otherwise to ensure confidence in the impartiality and objectivity with which Agency programs are administered. A waiver under this paragraph may impose appropriate conditions, such as requiring execution of a written disqualification.
#### § 550.713 Records.

Agencies shall maintain records, by fiscal year, of the number of employees who receive severance pay and the total amount of severance pay paid. The Office of Personnel Management may require agencies to report such information to the Office.

[55 FR 6593, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 64 FR 69178, Dec. 10, 1999]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProcedure for utilizing the lift and thrust forces of ornithoptersThis procedure is distinguished by two beating wings which together describe, in space, a succession of interlaced triangles. On these wings, whose incidence varies automatically, identical forces are exerted: simultaneous lift and thrust when they make their descent, which is inclined toward the front of the craft, and lift alone when they make their ascent, which is inclined toward the rear of the craft and follows a slide horizontal movement. A mechanical device makes these movements possible. It includes: two wings with hollow profiles, connected by a framework located above a rigid frame and attached to it by bars with joints. These bars are moved with control rods which gear down the drive force. A mechanism with elastic bands or springs automatically varies the incidence of the wings.Document ID19860012063Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - OtherAuthorsBezard, C.*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1985Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-77682NAS 1.15:77682Accession Number86N21534Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4006Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012063.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2016

- 0463

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM155AD

MOM

- MOM

- 15

- 0303

- 01B

--- 5/13/15

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
### §142h. Biomedical Ethics Board; disbursement of funds, computation and disbursement of basic pay, and provision of financial management services and support by Library of Congress

Effective October 1, 1988, and to continue thereafter, the Disbursing Officer of the Library of Congress is authorized to—

(1) disburse funds appropriated for the Biomedical Ethics Board;

(2) compute and disburse the basic pay for all personnel of the Biomedical Ethics Board; and

(3) provide financial management services and support to the Biomedical Ethics Board,

in the same manner as provided with respect to the Office of Technology Assessment under section 142f of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–163, title I, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1054.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 100–458, title I, Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2168.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 169

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the sworn affidavit of 

a veteran who served in combat during the Korean War or an earlier 

conflict to be accepted as proof of service-connection of a disease or 

injury alleged to have been incurred or aggravated by such service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Mrs. MALONEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to allow the sworn 

affidavit of a veteran who served in combat during the 

Korean War or an earlier conflict to be accepted as 

proof of service-connection of a disease or injury alleged 

to have been incurred or aggravated by such service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 169 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF KOREAN CONFLICT AND 

2 EARLIER COMBAT VETERANS TO BE ACCEPT3 ED AS PROOF OF SERVICE-CONNECTION OF 

4 DISEASE OR INJURY ALLEGED TO HAVE 

5 BEEN INCURRED OR AGGRAVATED DURING 

6 COMBAT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1154(b) of title 38, 

8 United States Code, is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘after July 27, 1953,’’ after 

11 ‘‘in active service’’; 

12 (3) by designating the third sentence as para13 graph (3) and in that paragraph inserting ‘‘under 

14 paragraph (1) or (2)’’ after ‘‘in each case’’; and 

15 (4) by inserting after paragraph (1), as des16 ignated by paragraph (1) of this subsection, the fol17 lowing new paragraph: 

18 ‘‘(2) In the case of any veteran who engaged in com19 bat with the enemy in active service on or before July 27, 

20 1953, with a military, naval, or air organization of the 

21 United States during a period of war, campaign, or expe22 dition, if there is no clear and convincing evidence to the 

23 contrary the Secretary shall accept as sufficient proof of 

24 service-connection of any disease or injury alleged to have 

25 been incurred in or aggravated by such service the sworn 

26 affidavit of the veteran attesting to the service-connection 
3

•HR 169 IH 

1 of such disease or injury, notwithstanding the fact that 

2 there is no official record of such incurrence or aggrava3 tion in such service.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to affidavits sub6 mitted after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §451b. Waters included within subchapter

For the purposes of this subchapter—

(1) The term "harbor of New York" means the tidal waters of the harbor of New York, its adjacent and tributary waters, and those of Long Island Sound.

(2) The term "harbor of Hampton Roads" means the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia.

(3) The term "harbor of Baltimore" means the tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters, and so much of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Maryland.

(June 29, 1888, ch. 496, §7, as added Pub. L. 85–802, §1(8), Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 970.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on sixtieth day after Aug. 28, 1958, see section 2 of Pub. L. 85–802, set out as an Effective Date of 1958 Amendment note under section 441 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     I, Terra Underwood, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Technol Fuel
     Conditioners, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

     By: /s/ Terra Underwood                                  Date: May 23, 2006
         -------------------
         Terra Underwood, Treasurer
         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1653.15 Payment.

Payment pursuant to a qualifying legal process will be made in accordance with § 1653.5.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-02-0139-PLAN FOR RESOLVING POLICY ISSUES RELATED TO LICENSING NON-LIGHT WATER REACTOR DESIGNS"

Accession Number: ML021830399

Date Released: Wednesday, August 7, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML021790610 - SECY-02-0139 - Plan for Resolving Policy Issues Related to Licensing Non-Light Water Reactor Designs (22 page(s), 7/22/2002)
    - ML021750021 - SECY-02-0139-Attachment 8--G20020376/LTR-02-0431 - George Apostolakis Ltr re Policy Issues Related to Advanced Reactor Licensing. (3 page(s), 6/17/2002)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 531.202 Coverage.

This subpart covers employees who occupy positions classified and paid under the GS classification and pay system, as provided in 5 U.S.C. 5102 and 5331 or other applicable laws. Law enforcement officers (LEOs) receiving LEO special base rates are covered by the GS classification and pay system, but receive higher base rates of pay in lieu of GS rates at grades GS-3 through GS-10. This subpart also covers GS employees who receive special rates under 5 U.S.C. 5305 and 5 CFR part 530, subpart C.
Exhibit 15.1







|SUITE
    1850                |                         
|----------------------------- | ------------------------
|1066
    WEST HASTINGS STREET | A
    CHANANDCOMPANY LLP
|VANCOUVER,
    BC V6E 382     | CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS    



|T:
    604.683.3850 | 
|------------------- | 
|F:
    604.688.8479 | 



AUDITORS’ CONSENT



We
consent to the incorporation of our report dated September 27, 2013, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial
position as at May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, consolidated
statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of changes in equity for the years ended May 31, 2013 and May 31, 2012 on
the Company’s Annual Report Form 20-F dated September 30, 2013.



|“A
    Chan and Company LLP”    | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Chartered
    Accountants       | 
|Vancouver, British
    Columbia | 
|September 30,
    2013          |
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# NRC Observation Audit Report OAR-05-06, Observation of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Audit of Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC.

Accession Number: ML052940198

Date Released: Monday, November 7, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML052940151 - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Observation Audit Report OAR-05-06, Observation of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Audit of Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC, OCRWMP-OQA-05-11, Project Engineering and Records. (3 page(s), 10/28/2005)
    - ML052940190 - OAR attachment: NRC Observation Audit Report OAR-05-06, Observation of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Audit of Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC. (13 page(s), 10/28/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
AFS-12-298-E April 18, 2012

Exemption No. 10510 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0382

Mr. Steve Frank

Parent of Jordan Frank

11722 268 th Drive, N.E. Duvall, WA 98019

Dear Mr. Frank:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received March 28, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Jordan Frank for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Jordan to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Jordan.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security2

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Jordan Frank exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Jordan is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Jordan to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Jordan’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Jordan Frank may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Jordan’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
#### § 185.136 Post-hearing briefs.

The ALJ may require the parties to file post-hearing briefs. In any event, any party may file a post-hearing brief. The ALJ shall fix the time for filing such briefs, not to exceed 60 days from the date the parties receive the transcript of the hearing or, if applicable, the stipulated record. Such briefs may be accompanied by proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The ALJ may permit the parties to file reply briefs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan W.Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| February 9, 2005     |

 

----
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0110 - Summary of Activities Related to Generic Issues Program

Accession Number: ML071620042

Date Released: Friday, July 20, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML071620064 - SECY-07-0110 - Summary of Activities Related to Generic Issues Program (7 page(s), 7/6/2007)
    - ML071630042 - SECY-07-0110 - Enclosure: Generic Issue Management Control System Report (June 30, 2007) (25 page(s), 6/30/2007)
    - ML071760420 - SECY-07-0110 - Enclosure: Generic Issue Management Control System Report (June 30, 2007) (20 page(s), 6/25/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer