alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.19  


EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

between David R. Beathard ("Executive") and

Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation ("Company"),

dated effective February 1, 2003  


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an "Executive Employment Agreement" bearing an original "Effective
Date" of February 1, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS, February 1, 2004, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the "Renewal Date" in that Executive Employment Agreement;
and 


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as
to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit February 1, 2006); and 



        WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce
Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and 


        WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and after the date of
this Extension Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the
experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and 


        WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and
approved by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Company. 


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, and in consideration of the sum
of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows: 


        1.     The
Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an "Effective Date" of February 1, 2003 and a "Renewal Date" which is deemed herein to be
February 1, 2004, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2005 and ending January 31, 2006, unless such employment period is
hereafter further extended for an additional period by both Executive and Company. 



        2.     All
provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company dated as of February 1, 2003, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full
force and effect 








without
change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2004. 



	 	 	POGO PRODUCING COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/S/ JOHN O. McCOY, JR.
 John O. McCoy, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	

ATTEST:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/S/ JOE ANN KINGDON
 Assistant Corporate Secretary	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

EMPLOYEE:
	

 	
 	

/S/ DAVID R. BEATHARD
 David R. Beathard

Senior Vice President—Engineering
Order entered September 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01072-CR

JAMES CRAWFORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 86th District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 30096-422

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s motion for rehearing and appellant’s motion requesting a 

copy of the trial record. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is OVERRULED. Appellant’s 

motion to request trial records is GRANTED IN PART.

We ORDER appellant’s counsel, J. Daniel Oliphant, to deliver, in paper format, copies 

of the portions of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record relevant to the issues raised on appeal 

which would include the following:

1. The amended indictment;

2. The trial court’s charge to the jury;
3. The jury’s verdicts;

4. The judgment; and

5. The reporter’s record of the entire trial except voir dire.

To reduce the amount of paper and cost involved, counsel may print this material on both sides 

of each sheet of paper and may print it in a format so that not more than two pages of the record 

appear on each side of the page. .

We ORDER Mr. Oliphant to file with this Court, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of 

this order, written verification that he has sent a paper copy of the record to appellant.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by electronic transmission, to J. 

Daniel Oliphant, and by first-class mail to James Crawford.

/David Evans/

DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
# • 06/21/93 RCRA REVISION CHECKUST 17H Double Liners
Note: Corrections were made to264.221 (c) and 264.301(c) bya May 9, 1990 (55 FR 19262; Revision Checklist 77) 

### notice. This correction notice was based ona decision reached iniheU.S. Court ofAppeals for the District of.Columbia on June 23, 1987 concerning a lawsuit filed against EPA. States which have notyet

. adopted the Revision Checklist 17H provisions are encouraged toadopt the Revision Checklist

# n corrections when adopting therequirements addressed by Revision Checklist 17 H.
.

FEDERAl REqUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS

. STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: MORE EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT BROADERIN SCOPE PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DJSPOSAL FACILITIES
SUBPART K- SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS apply toTSD facilities 264.22Ha) 650(2)(a) 

## x j 

# • two 

### ormore liners alternative design and operating practices jmonolills redesignate old 264.221(c), (d) and (e) as**264.221(~,** (g) and (h) 264.221(c) 264.22Hd) 264.2211e)
264.22Hfl-{h) 650(2}(D 650(k) 650{l)
650(m),(c),m 

## x 

# x x

x SUBPART N- LANDFillS
DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS introductory text 264;301(a) 665(2)(a) 

## x two ormore liners 264.30Hc) 665(2)(h) 

# x j alternative design and operating practices 264.30Hd) 665(2)(j) 

## x jmonofills 264.301 (e) 665(2)(k) 

## x redesignate old**264.301(c),{d),(e).{~** and (9)**as264.301(~, ~),(h).(j)**  and (j) 264.301 (f)-{j) . 665(2)(I)'!c)-lO 

# x landfills inAlabama 264.30Hk) noanalog PART 265 -INTERIM STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES 

# •

. -Page 1of296/21193 RCRA REVISION CHECKliST 17H: Double Uners (confd)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: MORE EQUIV- SIRINALENT GENT BROADERIN SCOPE
SUBPART K- SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

t two ormore liners notify Regional Administrator a1temative design and operating practices 265.221(a) 265.22Hb) 265.221(c) 400(3)(a) 400(3)(a) 400(3)(a) X X
X
t tmonofills allows installed liner to bepermitted liner 265.22Hd) 265.221(e) 400(3)(a) 400(3)(a) X X SUBPART 

### i.- WASTE PILES

. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. 265.254 requirements fornew units,' expansions, and replacements 265.254 400(3)(a) X 

# C

SUBPART N- LANDFillS
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS two ormore liners 265.30Ha) 400(3)(a) X notify the RA 265.30Hb) alternative design and toperating practices 265.301 (c) tmonofills 265.301 (d) t allows installed liner tobepermitted liner 265.30He) able only 

### to landfills inAlabama. States other than Alabama donothave toadopt this provision. 400(3)(a) 400(3)(a) 400(3)(a) 400(3)(a) X X X X

- Page 2 of2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,514,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,531,860
<PP&E>                                          68,563
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,567,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,896
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,062
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,964,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,567,761
<SALES>                                            416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   742
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (211,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (211,309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (211,309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1757

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the personal 

needs allowance applied to institutionalized individuals under the Medicaid Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the personal needs allowance applied to institutionalized 

individuals under the Medicaid Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MEDICAID PERSONAL NEEDS AL4 LOWANCE FOR INSTITUTIONALIZED INDIVID5 UALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(q)(2) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(q)(2)) is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘$30’’ and ‘‘$60’’ and inserting ‘‘$50’’ and ‘‘$100’’, 

9 respectively. 
2

•HR 1757 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to months beginning with Janu3 ary 2004.

Æ
### *The HONORABLE CHARLES R. WOLLE, Chief Judge, United

States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation. The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United States 1 

### District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 95-1647

___________ Donald Ray Lawrence, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * State of Iowa, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 15, 1995 Filed: March 5, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and WOLLE, District Judge. *

___________ PER CURIAM. Donald Ray Lawrence appeals from the District Court decision denying 1 his pet ition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) . We affirm. Lawrenc e was convicted of first degree murder in a bench trial and he was sentenced to l ife in prison. After exhausting his state remedies, he filed a § 2254 petition in the District Court. As

### -2-

grounds f or habeas relief, he claims that his trial counsel wa s ineffective; his waiv er of a jury trial was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary; and the recusal of the original trial judge at the prosecutor's request resulted in a violation of his constitutional rights to due proces s and a fair trial. The District Court denied Lawrence's petition, holding that hi s claims either were pr ocedurally defaulted or did not rise to the level of constitutional violations. We agree. As no error of law appears and an opinion from this Court would have no precedenti al value, we affirm on the basis of the District Court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE
CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN LAMSON        
|                        |  | John Lamson            
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Dat e: 

## TYIQOj , 

# Sept-crttbou II, ..lJJl) 

## a__t 1 0 

### 3u/hV) M ee tin g : /-{ 

## e (./; w 

### tl11__, 

# 3 CN - M t'R- 

## f3.u-l! VJ.el.d j 

## 6uy f1



## ~• ' r<f"'<-o)u_;Vl Rule(s) Discussed : **R.£~** Written Mate rials ? Y

### ~ Name Organization Phone N u mber 

# 73Yt1 We4v

**~511_0** 

### Crf11P . 

## 6 t 1 " 

## 3 

## tf ?

**~** 

## q'-( I Z- () 

# , 

# I I
§ 171.11 Petitions acted on by Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer. ( a ) *Remission or mitigation authority.* Upon receipt of a petition for relief submitted pursuant to the provisions of section 618 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1618), or section 5321(c) of title 31, United States Code (31 U.S.C. 5321(c)), the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is empowered to remit or mitigate on such terms and conditions as, under law and in view of the circumstances, he or she deems appropriate in accordance with appropriate delegations of authority.
( b ) *When violation did not occur.* Notwithstanding any other delegation of authority, the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is always empowered to cancel any claim when he or she definitely determines that the act or omission forming the basis of any claim of penalty or forfeiture did not occur.
( c ) *When violation is result of vessel in distress.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer may remit without payment any penalty which arises for violation of the coastwise laws if he or she is satisfied that the violation occurred as a direct result of an arrival of the transporting vessel in distress.
[T.D. 00-57, 65 FR 53576, Sept. 5, 2000, as amended by CBP Dec. 12-07, 77 FR 19534, Apr. 2, 2012]
| **Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
In connection    with the Quarterly Report of China Media Group Corporation a Texas corporation (the    "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months period ending June 30, 2012, as filed    with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),    Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of    his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Media Group Corporation, and will be retained by China Media Group Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
    /s/ Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali
--------------------------
Mohd Suhaimi    bin Rozali
Chief    Financial Officer
August 20,    2012 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-005 February 15, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DAVIS-BESSE OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET FEB. 22 IN OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Davis-Besse Oversight Panel will meet with FirstEnergy

Nuclear Operating Company officials on Wednesday, Feb. 22, in Oak Harbor, Ohio, to review recent

operating performance and NRC inspection activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant.

The plant resumed operation in March 2004 after a two-year shutdown to replace the reactor

vessel head and make other safety system and staff performance improvements. The NRC Oversight

Panel was formed in 2002 to coordinate the agency’s regulatory activities in response to the problems

at Davis-Besse; during the shutdown and startup process it held monthly public meetings with the

utility and continues to meet approximately bimonthly.

The meeting will be held at 2 p.m. at the Davis-Besse Administration Building, 5501 N. State

Route 2. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and will have an

opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned. 

The staff will also be available after the meeting for informal discussions with the public.

“We expect to hear from utility officials how they assess the results of the recent mid-cycle

outage,” said Steve Reynolds, Chairman of the NRC Oversight Panel. “In addition, we will discuss the

independent performance assessments being performed at the plant as well as findings of recent NRC

inspections.”

A transcript of the oversight panel meeting will be posted in several weeks on the NRC's web

site - http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html.

The NRC oversight panel includes NRC managers and staff from offices in Lisle, Illinois;

Rockville, Maryland; and the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site.

###
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ David Salzman
------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman American
Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant
November 13, 2003
### §288i. Representation conflict or inconsistency

#### (a) Notification

In the carrying out of the provisions of this chapter, the Counsel shall notify the Joint Leadership Group, and any party represented or person affected, of the existence and nature of any conflict or inconsistency between the representation of such party or person and the carrying out of any other provision of this chapter or compliance with professional standards and responsibilities.

#### (b) Solution; publication in Congressional Record; review

Upon receipt of such notification, the members of the Joint Leadership Group shall recommend the action to be taken to avoid or resolve the conflict or inconsistency. If such recommendation is made by a two-thirds vote, the Counsel shall take such steps as may be necessary to resolve the conflict or inconsistency as recommended. If not, the members of the Joint Leadership Group shall cause the notification of conflict or inconsistency and recommendation with respect to resolution thereof to be published in the Congressional Record of the Senate. If the Senate does not direct the Counsel within fifteen days from the date of publication in the Record to resolve the conflict in another manner, the Counsel shall take such action as may be necessary to resolve the conflict or inconsistency as recommended. Any instruction or determination made pursuant to this subsection shall not be reviewable in any court of law.

#### (c) Computation of period following publication

For purposes of the computation of the fifteen day period in subsection (b)—

(1) continuity of session is broken only by an adjournment of Congress sine die; and

(2) the days on which the Senate is not in session because of an adjournment of more than three days to a date certain are excluded.

#### (d) Reimbursement

The Senate may by resolution authorize the reimbursement of any Member, officer, or employee of the Senate who is not represented by the Counsel for fees and costs, including attorneys' fees, reasonably incurred in obtaining representation. Such reimbursement shall be from funds appropriated to the contingent fund of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 95–521, title VII, §710, Oct. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 1882.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title VII of Pub. L. 95–521, which enacted this chapter, section 5504 of this title, and section 1364 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and amended sections 3210, 3216, and 3219 of Title 39, Postal Service. For complete classification of title VII to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 3, 1979, see section 717 of Pub. L. 95–521, set out as a note under section 288 of this title.