alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 212.301 Competitive status defined.

In this chapter, competitive status means an individual's basic eligibility for noncompetitive assignment to a competitive position. Competitive status is acquired by completion of a probationary period under a career-conditional or career appointment, or under a career executive assignment in the former executive assignment system, following open competitive examination, or by statute, Executive order, or the Civil Service rules, without open competitive examination. An individual with competitive status may be, without open competitive examination, reinstated, transferred, promoted, reassigned, or demoted, subject to conditions prescribed by the Civil Service rules and regulations.

[33 FR 12408, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 57 FR 10123, Mar. 24, 1992]
#### § 143.25 Information on entry form, or its electronic equivalent.

Each Customs Form 368 or 368A (serially numbered) or, where used, Customs Form 7501, or its electronic equivalent, shall contain an adequate description of the merchandise and the item number of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202), under which the merchandise is classified.

[T.D. 76-213, 41 FR 31812, July 30, 1976, as amended by T.D. 87-75, 52 FR 26142, July 13, 1987; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51263, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 92-56, 57 FR 24944, June 12, 1992; CBP Dec. 15-14, 80 FR 61289, Oct. 13, 2015]
§ 337.205 Critical hiring needs. ( a ) OPM will determine when there is a critical hiring need for particular occupations, grades (or equivalent) and/or geographic locations. OPM may decide independently that such a need exists or may make this decision in response to a written request from an agency.
( b ) An agency when requesting direct-hire authority under this section, or OPM when deciding on its own, must: ( 1 ) Identify the position(s) that must be filled;
( 2 ) Describe the event or circumstance that has created the need to fill the position(s);
( 3 ) Specify the duration for which the critical need is expected to exist; and
( 4 ) Include supporting evidence that demonstrates why the use of other hiring authorities is impracticable or ineffective.
( c ) *Information Technology (IT) positions.* ( 1 ) The head of a covered agency, as defined in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, may determine whether a critical hiring need exists for any position in the information technology management series, general schedule (GS)-2210 or equivalent. In making such a determination, a covered agency must adhere to and use the supporting evidence criteria prescribed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. In addition, a covered agency must maintain a file of the supporting evidence for documentation and reporting purposes. Upon determination of such a finding, an agency head may approve a direct hire authority for covered positions within the agency.
( 2 ) *Covered agency.* A covered agency is an entity listed in 31 U.S.C. 901(b) (excluding the Department of Defense), or an independent regulatory agency defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5).
( 3 ) *Notification to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).* Once the head of a covered agency affirmatively determines the presence of a critical hiring need and the direct hire authority is approved by the agency head, he or she must notify OPM within 10 business days. Such notification must include a description of the supporting evidence relied upon in making the determination.
( 4 ) *Using this authority.* A covered agency must adhere to all provisions of subpart B of this part.
( 5 ) *Length of appointments.* A covered agency may use this authority to appoint individuals for a period of more than 1 year, but not more than 4 years, if the direct hire authority remains in effect. ( i ) A covered agency may extend an appointment under this authority for up to 4 additional years.
( ii ) No individual may serve more than 8 years on an appointment made under these provisions for information technology positions.
( iii ) No individual hired under these provisions may be transferred to positions that are not IT positions.
[69 FR 33275, June 15, 2004, as amended at 84 FR 12875, Apr. 3, 2019]
Hillsborough,

June, 1899.

#### State *(ex rel.*Borthwick & *a.) v.*Harrington *&*a*.*

.Petition, under P. S., *c.*205, *ss.*4, 5. This is the same case reported *ante, p.*496. After that decision, the plaintiffs moved at the trial term for an injunction against all the defendants, but introduced no evidence except the record. The motion was granted as to the tenant, and an order made dismissing the bill as to the landlords, to which the plaintiffs excepted.

*Martin £ Howe, Matthews $• Sawyer,*and *Sherman H. Burroughs,*for the plaintiffs.

*David A. laggart, Elijah M. lopliff, John P. Bartlett,*and *Drury Hurd,*for the defendants.

Wallace, J.

No question of law is presented by the case. It was a question for the trial term whether there was occasion for the injunction to issue or not.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Exhibit 31



Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)







Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company



I, Con Unerkov, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of China Media Group Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







Date: November 8, 2005





/s/ Con Unerkov

-----------------------

Con Unerkov

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-165 December 22, 2004

NRC EXTENDS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON PROPOSED 

URANIUM ENRICHMENT PLANT IN NEW MEXICO UNTIL JAN. 7

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended until Jan. 7 the public comment period for

the draft environmental impact statement for a proposed uranium enrichment plant to be built in Lea

County, N.M.

Public access to documents concerning the license application of Louisiana Energy Services for

the proposed plant was limited after the NRC shut down its online documents library for a security

review. 

The agency is placing on its Web site redacted versions of the draft environmental impact

statement, the environmental report submitted by LES as part of its application, and LES’s responses to

NRC staff requests for additional information related to the environmental report. These documents

will be available no later than Dec. 23 through this address: http://www.nrc.gov/materials/fuel-cyclefac/lesfacility.html . The redactions withhold potentially sensitive information relating to the security

of the proposed facility. 

Other publicly available documents may be available by request to the NRC’s Public Document

Room by calling (800) 397-4209 or (301) 415-4737, or through e-mail at PDR@nrc.gov . Requested

documents will be screened by the agency for sensitive information before they are released.

Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement should be postmarked by Jan. 7 and

sent to Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch, Mail Stop T6-D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. Comments may also be submitted by e-mail to

nrcrep@nrc.gov or by facsimile to (301) 415-5397, attention: Anna Bradford. Please note Docket

Number 70-3103 on all submissions.

###
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000586

31-JAN-2014

08:39 AM
### §1425. Relinquishment, surrender, and transfer of licenses and permits

#### (a) Relinquishment and surrender

Any licensee or permittee may at any time, without penalty—

(1) surrender to the Administrator a license or a permit issued to the licensee or permittee; or

(2) relinquish to the Administrator, in whole or in part, any right to conduct any exploration or commercial recovery activities authorized by the license or permit.

Any licensee or permittee who surrenders a license or permit, or relinquishes any such right, shall remain liable with respect to all violations and penalties incurred, and damage to persons or property caused, by the licensee or permittee as a result of activities engaged in by the licensee or permittee under such license or permit.

#### (b) Transfer

Any license or permit, upon written request of the licensee or permittee, may be transferred by the Administrator; except that no such transfer may occur unless the proposed transferee is a United States citizen and until the Administrator determines that (1) the proposed transfer is in the public interest, and (2) the proposed transferee and the exploration or commercial recovery activities the transferee proposes to conduct meet the requirements of this chapter and regulations issued under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–283, title I, §115, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 572.)
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-027 April 27, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING MAY 3

TO REVIEW HONEYWELL FUEL PLANT LEAK

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II office in Atlanta will hold a public meeting on

Wednesday, May 3 in Metropolis, Ill., by a special NRC inspection team at the Honeywell

International nuclear fuel processing plant to discuss circumstances surrounding an inadvertent leak of

UF6 (uranium hexafluoride) in a building at the plant on April 4. There was no release of material

outside the building. 

 NRC officials said the release was small, and radiological exposure to workers was minimal. 

One worker did sustain a slight reddening of skin on the arm due to chemical exposure to the UF6 gas. 

The Honeywell special inspection was led by Jay Henson from the NRC’s Region II office in

Atlanta, and the rest of the team included two additional Region II inspectors and one resident

inspector from the USEC fuel facility in nearby Paducah, Ky. 

The inspection team reviewed the event and its overall safety significance. The inspectors also

assessed the plant operators’ performance as well as any corrective actions that were being

implemented as a result of previous events at the facility. In addition, the team also looked at

Honeywell’s procedures, the company’s response to the events and any investigations or reviews by the

company. 

The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Metropolis Community Center, at 516 Superman

Square. The NRC team will announce the preliminary results of the inspection and a final publiclyavailable report will be issued within 30 days. 

 ###
### §907. Relationship to State duty

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as a limitation on the authority of any unit of the National Guard of a State, when such unit is not in Federal service, to perform functions authorized to be performed by the National Guard by the laws of the State concerned.

(Added Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §512(a)(1), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1879.)
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred
Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ James C. SmithJames C. Smith President (Principal Executive Officer) Date: March 15, 2010




Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 550.403 Advance payments; evacuation payments; special allowances. ( a ) An advance payment of pay, allowances, and differentials may be made to an employee who has received an order to evacuate, provided that, in the opinion of the agency head or designated official, payment in advance of the date on which an employee otherwise would be entitled to be paid is required to help the employee defray immediate expenses incidental to the evacuation.
( b ) Evacuation payments of pay, allowances, and differentials may be made to an employee during an evacuation and shall be paid on the employee's regular pay days when feasible.
( c ) Special allowances, including travel expenses and per diem, may be paid to evacuated employees to offset any direct added expenses that are incurred by the employee as a result of his or her evacuation or the evacuation of his or her dependents.
( d ) An advance payment or an evacuation payment may be paid to the employee, a dependent 16 years of age or over, or a designated representative. When payment is made to someone other than the employee, prior written authorization by the employee must have been provided to the authorizing agency official.
( e ) Any agency may make payments in an evacuation situation to an employee of another Federal agency (or his or her dependent(s) or personal representative) who has received an order to evacuate. When a payment is made under this subpart by an agency other than the employee's agency, the agency making the payment shall immediately report the amount and date of the payment to the employee's agency in order that prompt reimbursement may be made.
§ 550.1631 Other types of premium pay. ( a ) An agent may not receive premium pay for night, Sunday, or holiday work for hours of regularly scheduled overtime work within the agent's regular tour of duty.
( b ) An agent may receive premium pay for night, Sunday, or holiday work, as applicable, for hours not covered by paragraph (a) of this section, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5545(a) and (b) and section 5546 and corresponding regulations, except that section 5546(d) does not apply. (For an agent, pay for overtime work on a Sunday or holiday is determined under 5 U.S.C. 5542(g), not under section 5546(d).) The agent's rate of basic pay (without any overtime supplement) must be used in computing such premium payments.
( c ) An agent may not be paid standby duty premium pay under 5 U.S.C. 5545(c)(1) or administratively uncontrollable overtime pay under 5 U.S.C. 5545(c)(2).
§ 532.239 Review by the lead agency. ( a ) The lead agency shall review all material and wage survey data forwarded by the local wage survey committee to: ( 1 ) Assure that the survey was conducted within the prescribed procedures and specifications;
( 2 ) Consider matters included in the local wage survey committee report and recommendations;
( 3 ) Exclude unusable data;
( 4 ) Resolve questionable job matching and wage rate data; and
( 5 ) Verify all computations reported on wage data collection forms.
( b ) The lead agency shall determine whether the usable data collected in the wage survey are adequate for computing paylines, according to the following criteria: ( 1 ) The wage survey data collected in an appropriated fund wage survey are adequate if the unweighted job matches include at least one survey job in the WG-01 through 04 range, one survey job in the WG-05 through 08 range, and two survey jobs in the WG-09 and above range, each providing at least 20 samples; and at least six other survey jobs, each providing at least 10 samples.
( 2 ) The wage survey data collected in a nonappropriated fund wage survey are adequate if the unweighted job matches include at least two survey jobs in the NA-01 through 04 range providing 10 samples each, one survey job in the NA-01 through 04 range and three survey jobs in the NA-05 through 15 range providing five samples each; two other survey jobs, each providing at least five samples, and at least 100 unweighted samples for all survey jobs combined are used in the computation of the final payline.
( c ) ( 1 ) If the wage survey data do not meet the adequacy criteria in paragraph (b) of this section, the lead agency shall analyze the data, construct lines and wage schedules, submit them to the agency wage committee for its review and recommendations and issue wage schedules, in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, as if the adequacy criteria were met.
( 2 ) The lead agency may determine such a wage area to be adequate if the quantity of data obtained is large enough to construct paylines even though it was obtained for fewer than the prescribed number of jobs, or at different grade levels, or in different combinations than prescribed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( 3 ) The lead agency may not determine a nonappropriated fund wage area to be adequate if fewer than 100 usable unweighted job matches were used in the final payline computation.
( d ) If the lead agency determines a wage area to be inadequate under paragraph (c) of this section, it shall promptly refer the problem to OPM for resolution. OPM shall: ( 1 ) Authorize the lead agency to continue to survey the area if the lead agency believes the survey is likely to be adequate in the next full-scale survey;
( 2 ) Authorize the lead agency to expand the scope of the survey; or
( 3 ) Abolish the wage area and establish it as part of one or more other wage areas.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981, as amended at 55 FR 46140, Nov. 1, 1990. Redesignated at 55 FR 46141, Nov. 1, 1990]
|  | **Find the best gear for your student:****Sorority sister****Campus DJ****Student body president****Dean's lister****Teacher's assistant****The activist****The jock****The dude****See all student types** |  | **Three I can't study without**Which gadgets are must-haves for these CNET readers?**Top 50 universities**Which top colleges in the nation are tech savvy? |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### SUBCHAPTER II—COURT-APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Argo-Tech Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 25, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 22, 2004
    
    By: /s/


Michael S. Lipscomb
Michael S. Lipscomb
Chief Executive OfficerBy: /s/  Frances S. St. Clair
Frances S. St. Clair
Chief Financial Officer