T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C L AR E NC E E UG E NE HO WAR D, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. J . NU NL E Y, C . O. ; W. J . S UL L I VA N, W a r de n, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 17493 D. C . No . 1 : 0 6 - c v - 0 0 1 9 1 - NV W ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia N e i l V . W a ke , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dM cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C l a r e nc e E uge ne H ow a r d, aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng v i o l a t i o n s o f

h i s c o n s t i tu t i o n a l r i g h t s . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED JAN 09 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 17493 2 § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . W y at t v . T e rhune , 31 5 F . 3d 11 08 , 11 17 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 3 ) ( e x h au s tio n o f

a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s ) ; C lem ent v. G om ez , 298 F . 3d 898, 9 0 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) ( q u a lif ie dim m u n ity ) . W e a f

f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm entt o d ef endantN un l ey on H ow a r d’ s E i ghth A m e ndm e ntc l a i m r e gar di ng the us e of pe ppe rs pr ayon the basi s of qual i fi ed i m m un i ty, because i ti s uncon t es t ed thatH ow ar d d i sobeye d an order t o st op po un di ng on hi s c el l do or af t erhe al so re ce i ved a w arni ng thatfa i l ure to c o m p lyw o u ldr e s u lt in th e u s e o f p e p p e rs p r ay . Se e P e ars on v . Cal lahan , 555 U .S . 2 2 3 , 2 3 2 (2 0 0 9 ) ( “Q u alifiedim m u n ity is ap p li cab le u n less th e o ff icial’ s cond uctvi ol at ed a c l earl y e st abl i shed const i tut i on alri gh t . ”) ; se e al so W hi t leyv. A lb ers , 475 U . S . 312, 320 ( 1986) ( no c ons t i tut i ona l vi ol a t i on i f f or c e i s appl i e d i n a

“ ‘ go od fa i th eff

ortt o m ai nt ai n o r r es t ore di sc i pl i ne’ ” ( ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyc o n c lu d e dth a t H o w ar df a ile dto e x h au s t h is a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s on hi s c l a i m r e gar di ng the c ondi t i ons of hi s c onf i ne m e nt in a“m a n a g e m e n t s ta tu s ” c e ll. See B oo th v. Chu rner , 5 3 2 U .S . 7 3 1 , 7 4 1 n . 6 ( 2001) ( i nm a t e m us te xhaus ta dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e di e s “ i rr e s pe c t i ve of the f orm s of r e lie f s o u g h t an do f

f e r e dth r o u g h a d m in is tr a tiv e a v e n u e s ” ) . H ow ar d’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.