alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C, j,~

Nc.V REG(~

NRC International

Activities

Janice Dunn Lee, Director

International Programs

July 27, 2006
OVERVIEW

° NRC'S International Leadership

* FY 2006 Program

Accomplishments

" FY 2007 Anticipated Policy

Issues

* FY 2007 Challenges

" Summary

2
NRC's International

Leadership

* Unified Approach to

International Nuclear Programs

* Overarching Goal: Collaboration

• Requirements to Meet Goal

3
Roles of NRC Offices

• Commission Sets Policy

" Jointly Implemented by OIP and

EDO

" Program Office Technical

Expertise

" Improved Organizational

Effectiveness

4
Major Accomplishments

in Fiscal Year 2006

° Implementing the FY 2005

Priorities Categories

-- Export/Import Licensing

-- Legal Obligations

-- Bilateral Activities

-- Multilateral Activities

-- Research Cooperation

5
Export/Import Licensing

* Implementing the Code of

Conduct on Sources

- Licensing, Rulemakings

- National Source Tracking

- Outreach to Stakeholders

* Other Licensing Actions,

6
Treaties, Conventions

and Legal Obligations

* Physical Protection of Nuclear

Material

" International Safeguards

" Spent Fuel-Waste Joint

Convention

* Notification and Assistance

7
Bilateral Activities

* Ukraine Arrangement

• Security Assessment Rollout

* Ongoing Technical Exchanges

* Funding for New Assistance

8
Multilateral Activities

* International Atomic- Energy

Agency

* Nuclear Energy Agency

" European Commission

" International Commission on

Radiological Protection

" Senior Regulators Conference

9
Research Cooperation

" Bilateral/Multilateral

Agreements

* Prioritization

" Streamlined Process

10
FY 2007 Anticipated

Policy Issues

* 3-5 Short Turn-Around Licensing

Actions

* Negotiating/implementing Two

Major Section 123 Agreements

* Significant Challenges in

Bilateral Rollout of Security

Assessments

11
FY 2007 Anticipated

Policy Issues, Cont.

" Program Control at Both the

IAEA and NEA

* Preparing NRC for MDAPRelated Requests from Foreign

Counterparts

" Limited Resources for RES

Cooperation

12
FY2007 Challenges

* Export-import Licensing

* Legal Obligations

* Bilateral Activities

• Multilateral Activities

13
Management and

Resource Challenges

* Developmental Opportunities for

Staff

* Foreign Assignee Program

14
Sum'mary

• Prioritizing -within Current

Program and Level Budget

* Globalization of Nuclear Energy

* Leading and Learning

15
Abbreviations & Acronyms

NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission

EDO' Executive Director for Operations

FY Fiscal Year

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency

NEA Nuclear Energy Agency

MDAP Multinational Design Approval Program

OIP Office of International Programs

RES Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

16
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the Annual  Report of the Fund on Form  10-K/A for the year ended  December
     31, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  June 30, 2004


                              /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                              -----------------------
                              Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                              Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF**

**ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION**

 

Except as indicatedbelow, the following entities are direct/indirect 100% owned subsidiaries of the registrant: 

 

Entravision-Texas Limited Partnership, a Texas limited partnership 

Entravision-Texas G.P., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 

Entravision-Texas L.P., Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Entravision Communications Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

Entravision Holdings, LLC, a California limited liability company 

Entravision, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

Entravision 27, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

Entravision-El Paso, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company 

Entravision San Diego, Inc., a California corporation 

Arizona Radio, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Aspen FM, Inc., a Colorado corporation 

Diamond Radio, Inc., a California corporation 

The Community Broadcasting Company of SanDiego, Incorporated, a California corporation 

Latin Communications Group Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Los Cerezos Television Company, a Delaware corporation 

Z-Spanish Media Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Vista Television, Inc., a California corporation 

Channel Fifty Seven, Inc., a California corporation 

Lotus/Entravision Reps LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (50% owned) 

Televisora Alco, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexico entity (“Alco”) (40% minority, limited voting interest (neutral investment)owned) 

Tele Nacional, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexico entity (99.9% owned by Alco) 

TVNorte, S.A. de C.V., a Mexico entity (98% owned by Alco) 

Comercializadora Frontera Norte, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexico entity (99.88% owned) 

26 de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexico entity 

KNVO de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexico entity
#### § 2610.311 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit a copy of the Office's final decision granting the award, accompanied by a certification that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts, to the Associate Director for Administration, Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917. The Office will pay the amount awarded to the applicant within 60 days, unless judicial review of the award or of the underlying decision of the adversary adjudication has been sought by the applicant, the Office, or any other party to the proceedings.
### §503 to 507. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §135(d), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 174

Section 503, act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 597, §1, 49 Stat. 670, provided that, on and after Aug. 21, 1935, tolls over any bridge over any of the navigable waters of the United States, if such bridge is used for travel or transportation in interstate or foreign commerce, be just and reasonable and specified bridges to which sections 503 to 507 of this title not apply.

Section 504, acts Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 597, §2, 49 Stat. 671; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), 96 Stat. 2440, authorized Secretary of Transportation to determine reasonableness of any toll charged for passage or transit over any bridge to which sections 503 to 507 of this title applied and to prescribe an order establishing a reasonable toll, which order was to take effect thirty days after issuance.

Section 505, acts Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 597, §3, 49 Stat. 671; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §127, 63 Stat. 107; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), 96 Stat. 2440, provided for judicial review of orders of the Secretary of Transportation prescribing reasonable tolls.

Section 506, acts Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 597, §4, 49 Stat. 671; Oct. 15, 1970, Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §235, 84 Stat. 930; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), 96 Stat. 2440, authorized Secretary of Transportation to hold hearings in determining reasonableness of tolls, to require attendance of witnesses, and to punish witnesses for failure to attend such hearings.

Section 507, act Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 597, §5, 49 Stat. 672, related to punishment for failure to obey an order prescribing toll.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-045                                                                                                                    April 10, 2007

NRC STAFF APPROVES BIG ROCK POINT ISFSI LICENSE TRANSFER

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved the transfer of the operating license forthe Big Rock Point Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) from Consumers Energy toEntergy Nuclear Palisades and site operator Entergy Nuclear Operations. As provided by NRCregulations, the staff's approval of the license transfer became effective on April 6.

On Oct. 31, 2006, the companies submitted an application to the NRC requesting approval ofthe license transfer. Major issues considered by the NRC included financial qualifications as well astransfer and maintenance of accumulated decommissioning funds. Several groups petitioned the NRCfor leave to intervene in this proceeding, and the Commission is considering the petition.

A copy of the NRC's approval order and accompanying safety evaluation report will be placedin the NRC's Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room O-1 F23,Rockville, MD 20852 (telephone 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737). The safety evaluation will also beavailable on the NRC’s Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), byentering ML070920385 at this address: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm .   Help in usingADAMS is available by calling the Public Document Room.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### § 330.711 OPM's role in ICTAP.

OPM has oversight of ICTAP and may conduct reviews of agency compliance and require corrective action at any time.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24585]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-04-029]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission

TIME AND DATE: November 5, 2004 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1056 (Final) (Certain Aluminum Plate from South 
Africa)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before November 18, 2004.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 29, 2004.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-24585 Filed 10-29-04; 3:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
#### § 550.1002 Coverage.

This subpart applies to each employee (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 2105) in or under an Executive agency (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105) who has a scheduled tour of duty. The definition of “employee” in section 5541(2) does not apply to this subpart.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6723

ERIC KEYS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-535) Submitted: October 21, 2005 Decided: November 8, 2005 Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Keys, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* This case was decided by the magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Eric Keys seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely. * 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the magistrate judge’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the magistrate judge are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Keys has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



Exhibit 4(h)  



	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY	 	P. O. BOX 2606	 	BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA    35202-2606
	





 
 

ASSET BASED FEE ENDORSEMENT
  FOR
  VARIABLE ANNUITY DEATH BENEFIT RIDERS    
    


        We are adding the following provisions to the Variable Annuity Death Benefit Rider attached to your Contract: 


        Benefit Cost—The cost for the death benefit is equal, on an annualized basis, to {0.15%} of the average Contract Value on the
Valuation Days described in the next paragraph. 


        Monthly Fee—Once each month while the Variable Annuity Death Benefit Rider is in force, we will calculate the fee for the
death benefit and deduct that amount from the Contract Value. The monthly fee is calculated as of the end of the Valuation Period that includes the same day of the month as the Effective Date, or the
last Valuation Period of the month if that date does not occur during the month for which the fee is being calculated. The fee is deducted from the Contract Value as of the next Valuation Period. 


        Calculating the Monthly Fee—We calculate the monthly fee using the formula below: 


Monthly Fee = [1 - (1 - {0.15%}) 1/12] × CV, where 



CV = is the Contract Value as of the calculation date. 




        Deducting the Monthly Fee—We will deduct the monthly fee as of the Valuation Period immediately following the Valuation Period
for which it was calculated. The monthly fee will be deducted pro rata from the Allocation Options in the same proportion that the value of the Allocation Option bears to the total Contract Value.
Deduction of the monthly fee is a partial surrender for the purpose of calculating the death benefit. However, we will not assess a surrender charge on these deductions and the deductions will not
reduce any penalty free surrender amount available under the Contract. 


        Signed
for the company and made a part of the contract as of the Effective date. 


PROTECTIVE
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 



	

/s/ DEBORAH J. LONG
 Deborah J. Long
 Secretary	
 	

 




1









QuickLinks


ASSET BASED FEE ENDORSEMENT FOR VARIABLE ANNUITY DEATH BENEFIT RIDERS
|  | **2000 Countermeasure Issues**The following reports are in        the ADOBE Acrobat PDF file format and require you to download the Acrobat Reader 3.0 from **ADOBE**and install        it on your computer to view the files. Download:          1200kJanuary          2000 - Leadership Saves Soldiers- Suicide Prevention
- FY99 Ground Safety              Performance
- Radioactive              Material...Common, but DEADLY!.
- Know Your Simulators!
- You Make the Call
- Fort Leonard Wood Civilian              Submits Best
Download:          1000kFebruary          2000 - Dead in Their Tracks- Bradley Has New Rollover              Procedures
- Abrams Fires
- Wrong Way Down!
- Safety is a Leader              Responsibility
- Scout Training Area...BEFORE              It�s Too Late
Posters- ROLLOVER!              (160k PDF)
- Situational              Awareness Leads To A Safer Training              Environment  (811k              PDF)

         Download: 788kMarch          2000 - When Intense Summer Training Heats Up... So          Do Accidents!- Stopping Accidents In              Reserve Components 
- Deployment Safety 
- STOP, Look, and Listen!
- Who�s In Charge?.
- Tire Cage Injury
- Mechanic Run Over

** **Download:          1200kApril 2000 -          Water Safety... A Risk-Management Approach- Water Safety
- Tips For Safe Boating
- Battling Summer�s Heat
- "In All Things,              Moderation"
- Fort Drum Safety Office              Submits Best Answer
- Motorcycle Safety
- Accident - Free Way           |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §1483. Foreign government ships; immunity

No measures may be taken under authority of this chapter against any warship or other ship owned or operated by a country and used, for the time being, only on Government noncommercial service.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §14, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 10.)
§ 532.405 Use of highest previous rate. ( a ) ( 1 ) Subject to the provisions of § 532.407 of this subpart and part 536 of this chapter, when an employee is reemployed, reassigned, transferred, promoted, or changed to a lower grade, the agency may fix the pay at any rate of the new grade which does not exceed the employee's highest previous rate.
( 2 ) However, if the employee's highest previous rate falls between two step-rates of the new grade, the agency may fix the pay at the higher of the two.
( b ) ( 1 ) When an employee's type of appointment is changed in the same job, an agency may continue to pay the existing scheduled rate or may pay any higher rate of the grade which does not exceed the employee's highest previous rate.
( 2 ) However, if the highest previous rate falls between two step rates of the grade, the agency may pay the higher rate.
( c ) ( 1 ) The highest previous rate, if earned in a wage job, is the current rate of the grade and step-rate of the former job on the same type of wage schedule in the wage area in which the employee is being employed, or the actual earned rate, whichever is higher.
( 2 ) If earned on a General Schedule or another pay system other than the Federal Wage System, it is the current rate for the same grade and rate of that schedule.
( d ) The highest previous rate may be based upon a rate of pay received during a temporary promotion, so long as the temporary promotion is for a period of not less than 1 year. This limitation does not apply upon permanent placement in a position at the same or higher grade.
( e ) Before setting pay under this section, an agency must establish a policy regarding use of employees' highest previous rates. The policy must include the following elements: ( 1 ) Designation of officials with the authority to approve and set pay under this section;
( 2 ) Any situations in which the agency must use an employee's highest previous rate;
( 3 ) Any situations in which the agency may exercise its discretion in using an employee's highest previous rate;
( 4 ) Consideration of the step at which pay has been set for other employees performing similar work in the organization (based on the position's occupational series, grade level, types of duties, or other job-relevant factors) and any other factors the designated official(s) may or must consider in determining the step at which to set the employee's pay between the employee's entitlement under any other applicable pay-setting rule and the employee's highest previous rate; and
( 5 ) Documentation and recordkeeping requirements sufficient to allow reconstruction of the action.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 62701, Dec. 7, 1995; 89 FR 5755, Jan. 30, 2024]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Multi Housing Council

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the National Multi Housing 
Council (``NMHC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: National 
Multi Housing Council, Washington, DC. The nature and scope of NMHC's 
standards development activities are: To develop and promulgate open 
and voluntary standards for the apartment industry, thereby assisting 
the members of the industry and their business partners with the 
electronic exchange of information and enhancing the efficient 
operation of their businesses.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24576 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M