alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the
undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and President and Chief Financial Officer of New York & Company, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended May 3, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
June 10, 2008

/s/RICHARD P. CRYSTALRichard P. Crystal Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer/s/RONALD W. RISTAURonald W. Ristau President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dave Rose, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a' judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting him of violating section 421 of the Penal Law (misleading advertising). Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 430.210 OPM responsibilities. ( a ) OPM shall review and approve an agency's performance appraisal system(s).
( b ) OPM may evaluate the operation and application of an agency's performance appraisal system(s) and program(s).
( c ) If OPM determines that an appraisal system or program does not meet the requirements of applicable law, regulation, or OPM policy, it shall direct the agency to implement an appropriate system or program or to take other corrective action.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 07-027 February 23, 2007

STATEMENT OF NRC CHAIRMAN DALE KLEIN

TUCSON, ARIZONA FEBRUARY 23, 2007

Good afternoon. I have a short statement and then I’ll be glad to take your questions.

As you know, I have just finished a tour of the Palo Verde nuclear plant. While I was there I

spoke with the NRC employees who work there day in and day out keeping an eye on plant operations

as part of our job to protect people and the environment.

I had a good tour of the plant. And I had some very frank discussions with the management of

Palo Verde.

The message I took to them is simple: the number one priority is to maintain the safety of the

fleet of existing reactors.

At the NRC we set very high standards for safety, and the Palo Verde plant is meeting them. 

However, if we see the large margins of safety that we require in jeopardy, we have to act firmly – and

we have. 

There are significant performance problems at Palo Verde that must be addressed. To put it

bluntly: the status quo at Palo Verde is not acceptable.

To summarize what our inspectors have found, there has been a tendency at Palo Verde to

address symptoms rather than get to the heart of why a problem arose. This must change.

Over the past two years, management has attempted to change course at Palo Verde. They have

a get well plan, but they have not been completely successful at implementing it. That plan has to be

re-examined by the company and we will have to give our approval to it as they go forward.

Randy Edington, the new senior vice president at Palo Verde, told me this morning he intends

to turn around this decline. I told him we are going to be watching closely. He has a good reputation

for setting things straight, and I believe he will give this the hard work, dedication and commitment it

requires. It will not be an overnight job.
The NRC will continue to closely monitor operations at Palo Verde to ensure performance improves.

Thank you, and I’ll be glad to take a few questions.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6258
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH NATHANIEL BROWN, JR., a/k/a Joe Jr., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-93-151) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion to compel the prosecutor in his criminal case to produce certain documents. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown , No. CR-93-151 (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 370.108 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Agencies using this part must prepare and submit to OPM semiannual reports in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3706 which must include: ( 1 ) The total number of individuals detailed to, and the total number of individuals detailed from, the agency during the report period;
( 2 ) A brief description of each detail reported under paragraph (a)(1) of this section including: ( i ) The name of the detailed individual, and the private sector organization and the agency (including the specific bureau or other agency component) to or from which such individual was detailed;
( ii ) The respective positions to and from which the individual was detailed, including the duties and responsibilities and the pay grade or level associated with each; and
( iii ) The duration and objectives of the individual's detail; and
( 3 ) Such other information as OPM considers appropriate.
( b ) Reports are due to OPM no later than April 7 and October 7 of each year for the immediately preceding 6-month periods ending March 31 and September 30, respectively.
( c ) Agencies that do not meet the requirements of § 370.107 must prepare and submit annual reports to Congress in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 3703(e)(3), as appropriate.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 12
                                                                      ----------

                     ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                           Fiscal Year Ended

                           October 28,      October 26,       October 25,      October 31,   October 30,
                               1995            1996              1997             1998          1999
                           -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                       <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>            <C>
Historical:
  Income from operations    $ 15,059         $ 19,278          $ 26,650         $ 28,059      $ 33,846
  Other, net                    (588)            (112)             (404)            (268)         (516)
                            --------         --------          --------         --------      --------
Earnings as Adjusted        $ 15,647         $ 19,390          $ 27,054         $ 28,327      $ 34,362
                            ========         ========          ========         ========      ========
  Fixed charges:
  Interest expense          $ 11,924         $ 10,138          $ 12,827         $ 21,030      $ 25,003
                            ========         ========          ========         ========      ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed      1.3x             1.9x              2.1x             1.3x          1.4x
Charges

</TABLE>
§ 532.243 Consultation with the agency wage committee. ( a ) The lead agency shall submit to the agency wage committee: ( 1 ) The data collected in the wage survey;
( 2 ) The report and recommendations of the local wage survey committee concerning the use of data;
( 3 ) The lead agency's analysis of the data; and
( 4 ) The lines computed from the data.
( b ) After considering the information available to it, the agency wage committee shall report to the lead agency its recommendation for a proposed wage schedule derived from the data.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981. Redesignated at 55 FR 46141, Nov. 1, 1990]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1764 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1764

   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for appropriate 
    overtime pay for National Weather Service employees who perform 
            essential services during severe weather events.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2003

   Mr. Wolf introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for appropriate 
    overtime pay for National Weather Service employees who perform 
            essential services during severe weather events.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OVERTIME RATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 5542(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), for an 
        employee of the National Weather Service who occupies a 
        nonmanagerial position in GS-14 or under and, as determined by 
        the Secretary of Commerce--
                    ``(A) the duties of which are critical to the 
                immediate daily operation of the forecast and warning 
                responsibilities of the National Weather Service and 
                directly affect public and aviation safety;
                    ``(B) in which overtime work is usually unscheduled 
                due to the vicissitudes of severe weather; and
                    ``(C) in which overtime work is therefore unusually 
                taxing;
        the overtime hourly rate of pay is an amount equal to one and 
        one-half times the hourly rate of basic pay of the employee, 
        and all that amount is premium pay.''.
    (b) Exemption From Limitation.--Section 5547(d) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by striking the period and inserting ``, or to 
any employee of the National Weather Service who occupies a position 
described in section 5542(a)(6).''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to service 
performed on or after the first day of the first applicable pay period 
beginning after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-030 May 5, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS OCONEE NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERN

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a regulatory conference with officials

of Duke Energy on Wednesday, May 17, in Atlanta to discuss the risk significance of an inspection

finding at the company’s Oconee nuclear power plant, located near Seneca in northwestern S.C.

NRC and Duke officials will discuss the significance of an NRC inspection finding related to

apparent untimely corrective actions in resolving deficiencies related to the east penetration room

blowout panels for all three Oconee units. The meeting was requested by Duke. 

The blowout panels are designed to “blow out” if there is a pipe break in that area and prevent

water from flooding the auxiliary building and affecting safety-related equipment. Modifications to the

panels resulted in a lack of assurance that the panels would perform as designed. In 2004, Duke

indicated that additional modifications were necessary to prevent auxiliary building flooding. The

NRC staff determined that adequate corrective actions have not been taken promptly to resolve the

blowout panel concerns. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded system which classifies findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of

safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that this issue at Oconee is “greater

than green,” meaning it has more than very low safety significance.

The meeting is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. in the NRC’s Region II office, located on the 24th floor

of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street SW in Atlanta. The public is invited to attend to

observe and will have one or more opportunities to talk with NRC officials after the business portion,

but before the meeting is adjourned.

No decisions on final safety significance, any apparent violations or possible enforcement

action will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

###
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 29, 2016

p0321

Order 

Clerk

March 29, 2016

152147

STANLEY G. DENHOF,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152147

COA: 326929

Kent CC: 13-007919-CZ

CHARLES B. COVELLO,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2015 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2015311EN.01001901.xml

| 26.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 268/2014

of 12 December 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2015/2135]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2014 of 14 August 2014 amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2014 of 14 August 2014 amending Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zc (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0895: Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2014 of 14 August 2014 (OJ L 244, 19.8.2014, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0895: Commission Regulation (EU) No 895/2014 of 14 August 2014 (OJ L 244, 19.8.2014, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 895/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 13 December 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 244, 19.8.2014, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
### §10405. Guidelines

#### (a) In general

The Attorney General shall issue guidelines establishing procedures under which a State or specifically 1 qualified unit of local government that receives funds under section 10404 of this title is required to provide notice to the Attorney General regarding the proposed use of funds made available under this subchapter.

#### (b) Advisory board

#### (1) In general

The guidelines referred to in subsection (a) shall include a requirement that such eligible State or unit of local government establish and convene an advisory board to recommend a coordinated enforcement plan for the use of such funds.

#### (2) Membership

The board shall include representation from, if appropriate—

(A) the State or local police department;

(B) the local sheriff's department;

(C) the State or local prosecutor's office;

(D) the State or local juvenile court;

(E) the State or local probation office;

(F) the State or local educational agency;

(G) a State or local social service agency;

(H) a nonprofit, nongovernmental victim advocacy organization; and

(I) a nonprofit, religious, or community group.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1804, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12102(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1865.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3796ee–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1804 of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, as added Pub. L. 103–322, title II, §20201(a)(3), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1820, and classified to former section 3796ee–3 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, related to applications by local governments, prior to the general amendment of part R of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 107–273.

1 So in original. Probably should be "specially".
### §1111. Improving economy and efficiency

To improve economy and efficiency in the United States Government, the President shall—

(1) make a study of each agency to decide, and may send Congress recommendations, on changes that should be made in—

(A) the organization, activities, and business methods of agencies;

(B) agency appropriations;

(C) the assignment of particular activities to particular services; and

(D) regrouping of services; and

(2) evaluate and develop improved plans for the organization, coordination, and management of the executive branch of the Government.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 913.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1111 | 31:18. | June 10, 1921, ch. 18, §209, 42 Stat. 22; Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1939, eff. July 1, 1939, §1, 53 Stat. 1423; Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970, eff. July 1, 1970, §102(a), 84 Stat. 2085. |
| | 31:18a. | Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, §104, 64 Stat. 834; Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970, eff. July 1, 1970, §102(a), 84 Stat. 2085. |

In the section, before clause (1), the words "To improve economy and efficiency in the United States Government" are substituted for "(with a view of securing greater economy and efficiency in the conduct of the public service)" in 31:18 and "with a view to efficient and economical service" in 31:18a to eliminate unnecessary words. The word "President" is substituted for "Office of Management and Budget, when directed by the President" in 31:18 and "President, through the Director of the Office of Management and Budget" in 31:18a because sections 101 and 102(a) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970 (eff. July 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 2085) designated the Bureau of the Budget as the Office of Management and Budget and transferred all functions of the Bureau to the President. In clause (1), the words "existing" and "detailed" are omitted as surplus.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Regulatory Reductions

For provisions requiring executive departments and agencies to undertake to eliminate not less than 50 percent of its civilian internal management regulations not required by law, see Ex. Ord. No. 12861, Sept. 11, 1993, 58 F.R. 48255, set out as a note under section 601 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §53. Benton Harbor Canal, Michigan

The Benton Harbor Canal at and above the west line of Ninth Street, in the city of Benton Harbor and State of Michigan, is declared to be not a navigable water of the United States within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(June 2, 1937, ch. 288, §§1, 3, 50 Stat. 243.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This section, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act June 2, 1937, ch. 288, 50 Stat. 243, sections 1 and 3 of which are classified to this section. Section 2 of the Act, which relates to abandonment of a portion of the Benton Harbor Canal project, is not classified to the Code.