alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2.3 Apportionment.

Subject to such modifications as OPM finds to be necessary in the interest of good administration, appointments to positions in agencies' headquarters offices which are located within the metropolitan area of Washington, DC, shall be made so as to maintain the apportionment of appointments among the several States, Territories, and the District of Columbia upon the basis of population.
§ 2604.702 Charges. ( a ) *Duplication.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, copies of public financial disclosure reports requested pursuant to section 105 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, and § 2634.603 of this chapter will be provided upon payment of $0.15 per page furnished.
( b ) *Mailing.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the actual direct cost of mailing public financial disclosure reports will be charged for all forms requested. Where OGE elects to comply, as a matter of administrative discretion, with a request for special mailing services, the actual direct cost of such service will be charged.
( c ) *Minimum fees.* OGE will not assess fees for individual requests if the total charge would be $10.00 or less.
( d ) *Miscellaneous fee provisions.* The miscellaneous fee provisions set forth in § 2604.504 apply to requests for public financial disclosure reports pursuant to § 2634.603 of this chapter.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 21, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00243

- CV

THE LAW OFFICE OF DENNIS HUNSBERGER PLLC

, Appellant

v.

PHYSICIAN LIFE CARE PLANNING, LLC

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV04283

Honorable David J. Rodriguez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

S itting : R e beca C. Mar tinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodr iguez, Justice

The p anel has considered the Appellant ’ s Motion for Rehearing , a nd the motion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of September, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,991
<SECURITIES>                                    29,558
<RECEIVABLES>                                      271
<ALLOWANCES>                                        42
<INVENTORY>                                        199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,356
<PP&E>                                           1,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                     640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,569
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,736
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,461)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,898
<SALES>                                            423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   423
<CGS>                                              768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,092
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.59)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

###### Editorial Note on Part 351

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

#### § 351.512 Purchase of goods. [Reserved]
### §10182. Period of award

The Bureau may provide financial aid and assistance to programs or projects under this part for a period of not to exceed 4 years. Grants made pursuant to this part may be extended or renewed by the Bureau for an additional period of up to 2 years if—

(1) an evaluation of the program or project indicates that it has been effective in achieving the stated goals or offers the potential for improving the functioning of the criminal justice system; and

(2) the applicant that conducts such program or project agrees to provide at least one-half of the total cost of such program or project from any source of funds, including Federal grants, available to the eligible jurisdiction.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §518, formerly §514, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6091(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4336; renumbered §518 and amended Pub. L. 101–647, title XVIII, §1801(a)(5), (6), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4847.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3764 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 518 of Pub. L. 90–351, title I, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 208; Pub. L. 93–83, §2, Aug. 6, 1973, 87 Stat. 214; Pub. L. 94–503, title I, §122(b), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2418, prohibited certain constructions of provisions of title I of Pub. L. 90–351, prior to the general amendment of title I of Pub. L. 90–351 by Pub. L. 96–157.

#### Amendments

1990—Par. (2). Pub. L. 101–647, §1801(a)(5), substituted "applicant that conducts such program or project" for "public agency or private nonprofit organization within which the program or project has been conducted".
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

We, Rafi Amit, Chief Executive
Officer of Camtek Ltd., and Mira Rosenzweig, Chief Financial Officer of Camtek Ltd., each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report for Camtek Ltd. on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Camtek Ltd.

Date: April 7, 2009

| |  | By: /s/ Rafi Amit
 Rafi AmitChief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By: /s/ Mira Rosenzweig
 Mira RosenzweigChief Financial Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Camtek Ltd. and will be retained by
Camtek Ltd. and furnished to the United States Securities And Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.



---

---
| OPIC's Insurance Brokers ProgramsSmall Business Brokers ProgramContractors & Exporters Broker ProgramSmall Business Insurance Brokers ProgramDefinition of "*Small Business*"...- Any company with annual sales of less than $250 million including sales consolidated with the parent company;  OR
- Entities with no revenue, such as newly formed companies whose stockholders equity is less than $67 million
Commission:- 15 percent of the premium paid by the investor
- Paid per year for the life of the contract
- Total commission capped at $100,000 per small business prospect
- Payable upon receipt of first year’s premium |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 2422.21 What are the duties and powers of the Hearing Officer? ( a ) *Duties of the Hearing Officer.* The Hearing Officer receives evidence and inquires fully into the relevant and material facts concerning the matters that are the subject of the hearing. The Hearing Officer may make recommendations on the record to the Regional Director.
( b ) *Powers of the Hearing Officer.* After the Regional Director assigns a case to a Hearing Officer and before the close of the hearing, the Hearing Officer may take any action necessary to schedule, conduct, continue, control, and regulate the hearing, including ruling on motions when appropriate.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of New York & Company, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 1, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
December 11, 2008

/s/ RICHARD P. CRYSTAL Richard P. Crystal Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ SHEAMUS G. TOAL Sheamus G. Toal Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### § 2635.401 Overview.

Part 2640 of this chapter interprets and is the implementing regulation for 18 U.S.C. 208. This subpart summarizes the relevant statutory restrictions and some of the regulatory guidance found there. Specifically, this subpart contains two provisions relating to financial interests. One is a recusal requirement and the other is a prohibition on acquiring or continuing to hold specific financial interests. An employee may acquire or hold any financial interest not prohibited by § 2635.403. Notwithstanding that the acquisition or holding of a particular interest is proper, an employee is prohibited in accordance with § 2635.402 from participating in an official capacity in any particular matter in which, to the employee's knowledge, the employee or any person whose interests are imputed to the employee has a financial interest, if the particular matter will have a direct and predictable effect on that interest.
No. 13,471.

#### Grimes Company, Inc. *v.*Nelson.

(31 P. [2d] 488)

Decided March 12, 1934.

Rehearing denied April 2, 1934.

Mr. Max P. Zall, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Frank L. Shaw, Mr. M. T. Hancock, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Hilliard

delivered the opinion of the court.

*488Action for damages on alleged breach of contract. Defendant moved for change of place of trial, and on denial elected not to plead further, and to stand on its motion. Duly and timely the court entered defendant’s default, received proof of the contract, its breach and resultant damage, and gave judgment. Ruling on the motion is challenged.

It appears that defendant, a corporation having its place of business in Denver, engaging in writing to that end, sold, f. o. b. Center, to plaintiff, a merchant there, a quantity of potato bags at an agreed price per thousand, which it refused to deliver; that to meet the demands of his trade, plaintiff, at increased cost, was obliged to purchase bags elsewhere, to his damage. It further appears that service of summons was in Denver. The parties apparently agree that plaintiff is a resident of Center, Saguache county, where the venue was laid, and defendant of the City and County of Denver, whence the change was sought. Generally, as provided in section 29, Code 1921, unless service is made in the county of plaintiff’s residence, trial shall be had in the county of defendant’s residence; but regardless of residence and place of service, an exception is that “Actions upon contract may be tried in the county in which the contract was to be performed. ’ ’

Defendant contends the expression in the contract, “f. o. b., Center,” means that it should pay the freight, an element entering into the price of the goods, and is not otherwise important. The point is resolved contra in *Lamar Co. v. Bishop,*80 Colo. 369, 250 Pac. 689. See, also, *Street v. Werthan Bag and Burlap Co.,*198 Mo. App. 336, 200 S. W. 739, 742. “The place where a cause of action for a breach of contract arises is generally— almost universally — the place where the contract is to be performed. The reason why the place of the breach of contract is generally the place of its performance is that unless the place of performance is waived * * * it is only at such place that there is a breach or that it can *489be determined whether there is a breach.” 6 R. C. L., p. 1032, §389. See *Wester v. Casein Co.,*206 N. Y. 506, 100 N. E. 488; *Gould v. Mathes,*55 Colo. 384, 135 Pac. 780. We think it clear that defendant contracted to make delivery in Center, hence to perform there.

We are not impressed with the claim that the provision in the contract, *‘ ‘*Onr responsibility ceases on receipt of bill of lading from transportation company,” indicates delivery was to be in Denver. The provision is not pertinent. Defendant’s refusal to deliver, not manner or result of delivery, is the basis of plaintiff’s action.

Let the order be that the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Adams and Mr. Justice Campbell concur.
§ 201.2 Definitions. As used in this chapter— ( a ) *Commission* means the United States International Trade Commission;
( b ) *Inspector General* means the Inspector General of the Commission;
( c ) *Tariff Act* means the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1202-1677j, 1677m-n;
( d ) *Trade Expansion Act* means the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, 19 U.S.C. 1801-1991;
( e ) *Trade Act* means the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. 2101-2487;
( f ) *Trade Agreements Act* means the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, Public Law 96-39, 93 Stat. 144;
( g ) *Rule* means a section of the Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR chapter II);
( h ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Commission.
( i ) Except for adjudicative investigations under subchapter C of this chapter, *party* means any person who has filed a complaint or petition on the basis of which an investigation has been instituted, or any person whose entry of appearance has been accepted pursuant to § 201.11 (a) or (c). Mere participation in an investigation without an accepted entry of appearance does not confer party status.
( j ) *Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization.
[56 FR 11922, Mar. 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 37336, July 20, 1995; 68 FR 32973, June 3, 2003]
### **CHAPTER 54—COMMERCIAL ENGAGEMENT THROUGH OCEAN TECHNOLOGY**

Sec.
4101.
Definitions.
4102.
Coordination regarding assessment and acquisition by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of unmanned maritime systems.
4103.
Regular assessment of unmanned maritime systems to support National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration missions.
4104.
Acquisition of unmanned maritime systems.
4105.
Reports on unmanned maritime systems and usage for mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
4106.
Funding and additional authorities.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancesset forth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No.95-30794

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONARD GONZALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CR-266 R)

January 25, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonard Gonzales contends on appeal that the district court erred in determining his

sentence by (1) increasing his offense level based on a finding that he had a supervisory role

in the offense, and (2) by ordering that he pay the sumof $48,559 in restitution to his victim.

Our review of the record discloses neither reversible error nor abuse of discretion.

The sentence appealed is AFFIRMED.
#### § 2421.10 Chief Administrative Law Judge.

*Chief Administrative Law Judge* means the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Authority.
### §2296. Acquisition of recreation lands

(a) In the case of any water resources project which is authorized to be constructed by the Secretary before, on, or after November 17, 1986, construction of which has not commenced before November 17, 1986, and which involves the acquisition of lands or interests in lands for recreation purposes, such lands or interests shall be acquired along with the acquisition of lands and interests in lands for other project purposes.

(b) The Secretary is authorized to acquire real property by condemnation, purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, as a part of any water resources development project for use for public park and recreation purposes, including but not limited to, real property not contiguous to the principal part of the project.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §926, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4195.)
----

Exhibit 10.5

LA JOLLA COVE INVESTORS, INC.     2250 UNION STREET, SUITE 301     SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94123

                                                                                   TELEPHONE:  (415) 409-8703                                   FACSIMILE:    (415) 409-8704

E-MAIL: LJCI@PACBELL.NET     LA JOLLA                       www.ljcinvestors.com         SAN FRANCISCO

September ___, 2002

Mr. Scott Venters     Magic Media Networks, Inc.     530 N. Federal Highway     Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Dear Scott,

This letter shall serve as an addendum to the following documents: 7 3⁄4% Convertible Debenture, Registration Rights Agreement, Securities Purchase Agreement and the Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. Capitalized terms shall have the meaning set forth in the respective documents. The following changes and additions are hereby made and agreed upon:     1.         Holder agrees that, beginning in the next full calendar month after the Registration Statement is declared effective, Holder will convert 10% of the face value of the Debenture, and exercise 10% of the Warrants, per calendar month into Common Shares of the Company, provided that: a) the Common Shares are available, registered and freely tradeable, and b) the price of the Common Shares closes at a price above three cents ($0.03) for at least 10 of the 20 trading days prior to the conversion and exercise.

Sincerely,

Travis W. Huff

Portfolio Manager

Agreed to:

Itronics, Inc.

By: _______________________

Title: ______________________
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-158 December 15, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, NIAGARA MOHAWK TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATIONS

AT NINE MILE POINT PLANTS INVOLVING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation officials on Friday, December

19, to discuss apparent violations of agency requirements at the

utility’s Nine Mile Point 1 and 2 nuclear power plants. The

plants are located in Oswego, N.Y.

The apparent violations relate to shortcomings in the

plants’ radioactive waste programs and errors in the

transportation of radioactive waste.

Scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room

at the NRC Region 1 office in King of Prussia, Pa., the

predecisional enforcement conference will be open to the public

for observation.

Specifically, the issues to be discussed include: the

shipment of two core shroud samples that caused radiation levels

in the transportation vehicle’s occupied space to exceed federal

limits; the incorrect shipment of a liner of low-level

radioactive waste; two shipments, in 1995 and 1997, of

radioactive material to a facility not licensed to receive the

material; insufficient controls in the radioactive waste process

control program; a failure to conduct audits of vendors supplying

radioactive waste services and equipment; and a failure to

identify and correct radioactive waste program deficiencies.

The decision to hold a predecisional enforcement

conference does not mean that the NRC has determined a violation

has occurred or that enforcement action will be taken. Rather,

the purpose is to discuss apparent violations, their causes and

safety significance; to provide the licensee with an opportunity

to point out any errors that may have been made in the NRC

inspection report; and to enable the licensee to outline its

proposed corrective action.

No decision on the apparent violations will be made at
2

this conference. That decision will be made by NRC officials at

a later time.

#
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Camtek Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-84476, 333-60704,
333-49982 and 333-113139) of Camtek Ltd. Of our report dated March 12, 2006, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Camtek Ltd. as of December 31, 2005 and
for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on
form 20-F of Camtek Ltd., filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.

|                                          |                                    
|----------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.               | /s/ Goldstein Sabo Tevet           
|A member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
|Certified Public Accountants             

Tel Aviv, IsraelJune 28, 2007



---

---
§ 210.101 Applicability of various parts of regulations. ( a ) *General.* In most parts, the applicability of the part is stated specifically in the part or is otherwise apparent from the substance of the part.
( b ) *Parts 315 through 339.* Parts 315 through 339 of this chapter apply to all positions in the competitive service and to all incumbents of those positions; and, except as specified by or in an individual part, these parts do not apply to positions in the excepted service or to incumbents of those positions.
[33 FR 12407, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 44 FR 45587, Aug. 3, 1979]