alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 511.604 Filing an appeal. ( a ) *Employee.* An employee may appeal by writing to the Office directly, or by forwarding the appeal through the employing agency.
( b ) Referral of an employee appeal to the Office. An agency shall forward, within 60 calendar days of its receipt in the agency, and employee's appeal filed through the agency to the Office when: ( 1 ) The employee has directed the appeal to the Office and the agency's written decision is not favorable; or
( 2 ) The agency is not authorized to act on the employee's appeal; or
( 3 ) The agency has not decided the appeal within the established time period.
### Part E—National Community Economic Partnership
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  consolidated  balance sheet and consolidated  statement of operations
for the  fiscal  year  ending  January  3, 1998,  and such is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001051260
<NAME>                          GLENOIT ASSET CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                             76
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   76
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             652
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,130
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,610
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   12
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,817)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 9,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                    3,295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             6,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,120
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  6.120
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  6.120
        


</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Annual Report of the Fund on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                     
|   



|Date: June 27, 2007
|-------------------

/s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 2638.402 Informal action. If the Director has information indicating that an agency ethics program is not compliant with the requirements set forth in applicable government ethics laws and regulations, the Director is authorized to take any or all of the measures described in this section. The Director may: ( a ) Contact agency ethics officials informally to identify the relevant issues and resolve them expeditiously;
( b ) Issue a notice of deficiency to make the agency aware of its possible noncompliance with an applicable government ethics law or regulation;
( c ) Require the agency to respond in writing to the notice of deficiency;
( d ) Require the agency to provide such additional information or documentation as the Director determines to be necessary;
( e ) Issue an initial decision with findings as to the existence of a deficiency in the agency's ethics program;
( f ) Require the agency to correct or, at the Director's discretion, satisfactorily mitigate any deficiency in its ethics program;
( g ) Provide the agency with guidance on measures that would correct or satisfactorily mitigate any program deficiency;
( h ) Monitor the agency's efforts to correct or satisfactorily mitigate the deficiency and require the agency to submit progress reports; or
( i ) Take other actions authorized under the Act to resolve the matter informally.
§ 1315.6 Payment without evidence that supplies have been received (fast payment). ( a ) In limited situations, payment may be made without evidence that supplies have been received. Instead, a contractor certification that supplies have been shipped may be used as the basis for authorizing payment. Payment may be made within 15 days after the date of receipt of the invoice. This payment procedure may be employed only when all of the following conditions are present: ( 1 ) Individual orders do not exceed $25,000 (except where agency heads permits a higher amount on a case-by-case basis);
( 2 ) Deliveries of supplies are to occur where there is both a geographical separation and a lack of adequate communications facilities between Government receiving and disbursing activities that make it impracticable to make timely payments based on evidence of Federal acceptance;
( 3 ) Title to supplies will vest in the Government upon delivery to a post office or common carrier for mailing or shipment to destination or upon receipt by the Government if the shipment is by means other than the Postal Service or a common carrier; and
( 4 ) The contractor agrees to replace, repair, or correct supplies not received at destination, damaged in transit, or not conforming to purchase requirements.
( b ) Agencies shall promptly inspect and accept supplies acquired under these procedures and shall ensure that receiving reports and payment documents are matched and steps are taken to correct discrepancies.
( c ) Agencies shall ensure that specific internal controls are in place to assure that supplies paid for are received.
( d ) As authorized by the 1988 Amendment to the Prompt Payment Act (Section 11(b)(1)(C)), a contract clause at 48 CFR 52.213-1 is provided in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) at 48 CFR part 13, subpart 13.4 “Fast Payment Procedure,” for use when using this fast payment procedure.
No. 13,037.

#### Lesser *v.*Porter et al.

(30 P. [2d] 318)

Decided February 19, 1934.

Mr. Waldo Rifeenburg, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Gr. H. Bradeield, for defendants in error.

*In Department.*

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the court.

*349Conrod Lesser sued William Tecumseh Porter and Helen Porter for damages for inducing him by false representations to enter into a contract for the purchase of a farm. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court granted a nonsuit and dismissed the case.

There are two false representations alleged in the complaint; namely, that the farm contained 90 acres, and that it was worth $24,000. The trial court held that there was no evidence of the falsity of the representation as to acreage, and that the plaintiff’s evidence did not show that the representation as to value was a representation of a fact as distinguished from the expression of an opinion.

1. The transaction occurred in October, 1928. William T. Porter, who acted for himself and his wife, Helen A., signed and swore to the 1928 and 1929 tax schedules, in which the acreage of the property was given as 60 acres. That was sufficient to go to the jury on the question of the falsity of the representation that the farm contained 90 acres.

2. The parties were negotiating for the sale and purchase of the farm. Oonrod testified that Porter represented to him that the farm was worth $24,000; that he (Oonrod) believed the representation; and that had he not believed it he would not have entered into the contract. He introduced evidence of the falsity of the representation and of the damages suffered by him.

The law in this state is well settled. In *Lewis v. Wins-low, 77*Oolo. 95, 98, 234 Pac. 1070, we stated it in these words: *“* * **representations of value, or cost or quality, of property, if made with the purpose of having them accepted by the party to whom they are made, as of fact, and so relied upon, are to be treated as representations of fact.” And see *American National Bank v. Hammond,*25 Colo. 367, 55 Pac. 1090; *Groves v. Chase,*60 Colo. 155, 151 Pac. 913; *Highfill v. Ermence,*73 Colo. 478, 216 Pac. 533; *Muse v. Marx, 78*Colo. 90, 239 Pac. *350881; *People v. Martin,*78 Colo. 200, 240 Pac. 695; *Cahill v. Readon,*85 Colo. 9, 273 Pac. 653. The present case comes within the rule announced in those cases. In the circumstances, the question whether or not the representation was one of fact was a jury question. ■ It was reversible error to grant the nonsuit and dismiss the case.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

Me. Chief Justice Adams and Me. Justice Bouck concur.
# TITLE 33—NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS

Chap.
Sec.
1.
Navigable Waters Generally
1
2.
International Rules for Navigation at Sea [Repealed]
61
3.
Navigation Rules for Harbors, Rivers, and Inland Waters Generally
151
4.
Navigation Rules for Great Lakes and Their Connecting and Tributary Waters [Repealed]
241
5.
Navigation Rules for Red River of the North and Rivers Emptying Into Gulf of Mexico and Tributaries [Repealed]
301
5A.
Exemption of Navy or Coast Guard Vessels From Certain Navigation Rules [Repealed]
360
6.
General Duties of Ship Officers and Owners After Collision or Other Accident [Repealed]
361
7.
Regulations for the Suppression of Piracy
381
8.
Summary Trials for Certain Offenses Against Navigation Laws
391
9.
Protection of Navigable Waters and of Harbor and River Improvements Generally
400
10.
Anchorage Grounds and Harbor Regulations Generally
471
11.
Bridges Over Navigable Waters
491
12.
River and Harbor Improvements Generally
540
13.
Mississippi River Commission
641
14.
California Debris Commission
661
15.
Flood Control
701
16.
Lighthouses
711
17.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
851
18.
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation
901
19.
Saint Lawrence Seaway
981
20.
Pollution of the Sea by Oil [Repealed]
1001
21.
International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea [Repealed]
1051
22.
Sea Grant Colleges and Marine Science Development
1101
23.
Pollution Control of Navigable Waters [Omitted or Transferred]
1151
24.
Vessel Bridge-to-Bridge Communication
1201
25.
Ports and Waterways Safety Program [Repealed or Transferred]
1221
26.
Water Pollution Prevention and Control
1251
27.
Ocean Dumping
1401
28.
Pollution Casualties on the High Seas: United States Intervention
1471
29.
Deepwater Ports
1501
30.
International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea
1601
31.
Ocean Pollution Research and Development and Monitoring Planning [Repealed]
1701
32.
Inland Waterways Trust Fund
1801
33.
Prevention of Pollution From Ships
1901
33A.
Marine Debris Research, Prevention, and Reduction
1951
34.
Inland Navigational Rules
2001
35.
Artificial Reefs
2101
36.
Water Resources Development
2201
37.
Organotin Antifouling Paint Control [Repealed]
2401
38.
Dumping of Medical Waste by Public Vessels
2501
39.
Shore Protection from Municipal or Commercial Waste
2601
40.
Oil Pollution
2701
41.
National Coastal Monitoring
2801
42.
Estuary Restoration
2901
43.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps
3001
44.
Oceans and Human Health
3101
45.
Tsunami Warning and Education
3201
46.
National Levee Safety Program
3301
47.
Ocean Exploration
3401
48.
Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration
3501
49.
Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System
3601
50.
Federal Ocean Acidification Research and Monitoring
3701
51.
Clean Hulls
3801
52.
Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation
3901
53.
Harmful Algal Bloom and Hypoxia Research and Control
4001
54.
Commercial Engagement Through Ocean Technology
4101
55.
Save Our Seas 2.0
4201
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 30-35059-CivP; ASLBP No. 04-834-01-CivP]


U.S. Inspection Services; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 Fed. Reg. 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board is being established to preside over the following 
proceeding: U.S. Inspection Services, Dayton, Ohio, (Civil Monetary 
Penalty).
    This proceeding concerns a request for hearing submitted on 
September 24, 2004, by U.S. Inspection Services (USIS) in response to a 
September 1, 2004 notice (69 FR 54,816 (Sept. 10, 2004)), regarding a 
Notice Of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty associated 
with an inspection of USIS activities on September 12, 2003, that 
indicated USIS had not been conducting its activities in full 
compliance with NRC requirements.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:
    Ann M. Young, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Alex S. Karlin, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    Dr. Peter S. Lam, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
with the administrative judges in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of November 2004.
G. Paul Bollwerk, III,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 04-24705 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-008 February 16, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

TO OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

Ryan Treadway has been assigned as the new Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident 

Inspector at the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant. He joins NRC Senior Resident Inspector Marc

Ferdas at the plant, in Lacey Township, NJ. The plant is operated by Amergen. 

“Ryan Treadway brings with him the experience and commitment to safety that will help the

NRC ensure that Oyster Creek conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect public

health and safety," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins.

Treadway first joined the NRC in October 2004 as a reactor engineer in the Region I Division

of Reactor Projects. He later was assigned as an engineer in the Region’s Division of Reactor Safety. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Treadway served in the United States Navy for eight years. 

Treadway was graduated from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., with a bachelor’s

degree in nuclear engineering/engineering physics. He is currently pursuing a master’s in engineering

management at Drexel University in Philadelphia. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as

the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and

interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Oyster Creek resident inspectors can be reached at 609/693-0702.

#
#### § 550.502 Definitions.

In this subpart:

*Employee* means a person holding a position.

*Pay* means pay paid for services in a position but excludes fees paid on other than a time basis.

*Position* has the meaning given that term by section 5531 of title 5, United States Code.

*Week* means the period of 7 calendar days from Sunday through Saturday.

[33 FR 12458, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 60 FR 67287, Dec. 29, 1995]
#### § 534.201 General.

Under subchapter V of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code (U.S.C. 5351-5356), agencies may pay stipends and provide certain services to certain student-employees assigned or attached to hospitals, clinics, or medical or dental laboratories operated by agencies. Student-employees covered under the program are excluded from certain provisions of law relating to classification, General Schedule pay, premium pay, leave, and hours of duty. This subpart authorizes the coverage of certain positions under this program and establishes maximum stipends for student-employees in the program.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

PITAC's Subcommittee on Cyber Security will provide an update of its activities and present its draft findings and recommendations. PITAC will discuss the Subcommittee's presentation and provide guidance for use in the completion of PITAC's report on cyber security. Public input will be solicited during a public comment period. A small fraction of the meeting time may be allocated for other PITAC updates at the discretion of the co-chairs and the designated Federal officer.

# DATES:

Friday, November 19, 2004, 3-5:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Via teleconference, the Internet, or at the Grand Hyatt Hotel, 1000 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This meeting will be held primarily via a teleconference and the Internet (through the WebEx application). In addition, the public is invited to participate in this meeting in-person at the Grand Hyatt Hotel in Washington, DC. Detailed information about this meeting, including the agenda and details concerning registration for in-person or remote participation, will be posted at PITAC's Web site (                    *http://www.nitrd.gov/​pitac*) no later than November 3rd. Meeting information may also be obtained by calling 703-292-4873.                

Members of the public who wish to participate using the Internet (WebEx) must register by Tuesday, November 16th, 5 p.m. Eastern Time.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Contact Alan Inouye at the National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research and Development at 703-292-4873 or by e-mail at                         *inouye@nitrd.gov*.                    

Dated: October 28, 2004.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-24473 Filed 11-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
§ 532.215 Establishments included in regular appropriated fund surveys. ( a ) All establishments having a total employment of 50 or more employees in the prescribed industries within a survey area shall be included within the survey universe. On rare occasions and as an exception to the rule, OPM may authorize lower minimum size levels based on a recommendation of the lead agency for the wage area.
( b ) Establishments to be covered in surveys shall be selected under standard probability sample selection procedures. In areas with relatively few establishments, surveys shall cover all establishments within the prescribed industry and size groups.
( c ) A lead agency may not delete from a survey an establishment properly included in an establishment list drawn under statistical sampling procedures.
[55 FR 46142, Nov. 1, 1990]
#### Mamie Mills, Respondent, v. Maurice Beck, Appellant.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. This appeal was not dismissed; it was simply marked off the day calendar. Present—Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
Exhibit 32

| | The
following  certification accompanies and is furnished in connection with  Firstwave
Technologies,  Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter ended March 31,
2004 and is  not considered as filed as  provided in SEC Release Nos
33-8212,  34-47551 and IC-25967.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the  Company)
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the  Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: May 13, 2004 | /s/ Richard T. BrockRichard T. Brock
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: May 13, 2004 | /s/ Judith A. VitaleJudith A.
VitaleChief Financial Officer
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

A signed
original of this  written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Firstwave  Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Firstwave Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.