alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0069 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2006

Accession Number: ML070730517

Date Released: Monday, April 23, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML070730514 - SECY-07-0069 - Reactor Oversight Process Self Assessment for Calendar Year 2006 (10 page(s), 4/6/2007)
    - ML070730519 - SECY-07-0069 Atch 1 - ROP Program Area Evaluations (13 page(s), 4/6/2007)
    - ML070730523 - SECY-07-0069 Atch 2 - Status of Implementation Issues (3 page(s), 4/6/2007)
    - ML070730527 - SECY-07-0069 Atch 3 - Stakeholder Survey Results (10 page(s), 4/6/2007)
    - ML070730532 - SECY-07-0069 Atch 4 - Regulatory Impact Summary (3 page(s), 4/6/2007)
    - ML070730537 - SECY-07-0069 Atch 5 - ROP Resources (3 page(s), 4/6/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 359.201 Regulatory requirements.

This part contains the regulations of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that implement subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 5, United States Code, on the Senior Executive Service (SES).
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-034 September 12, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING IN HOUSTON

 ON PROPOSED NATIONAL SOURCE TRACKING SYSTEM

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a public meeting Sept. 20 in Houston,

Texas, to discuss its proposed national tracking system for certain radioactive materials used for

academic, medical and industrial purposes.

As announced in the Federal Register on July 28, the NRC is considering amending its

regulations to require licensees to report information on the manufacture, transfer, receipt or

disposal of certain radioactive materials and sources of interest to the automated tracking system.

The sources are considered to be “sealed sources” because they are encased in a capsule designed

to prevent leakage or escape of the material. The NRC worked extensively with other agencies

and the international community to reach agreement on which radioactive sources should be

tracked. They include, but are not limited to, certain amounts of Cobalt-60, Strontium-90,

Cesium-137, Iridium-192 and Americium-241.

Licensees would have to report their initial inventory of these sources and annually verify

and reconcile the information in the system with the licensee’s actual inventory. In addition, the

proposed rule would require manufacturers to assign a unique serial number to each nationally

tracked source. The proposed rule is available on the NRC’s rulemaking website at 

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

 The meeting will be at the offices of the Texas Department of State Health Services, Elias

Ramirez State Office Building, 5425 Polk Street, Rooms 4B-4E, Houston, from 12:30 p.m. to

4:30 p.m. NRC held a meeting on the same topic in Rockville, Md. Aug. 29.

The agenda includes a 30-minute welcome, introduction and NRC staff presentation on

the rule requirements, with the remainder of the time available for public comments. The time

available per person may be limited to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to speak.
Those planning to attend are requested to notify Ikeda King, telephone 301-415-7278,

e-mail ijk@nrc.gov to pre-register. On-site registration at the meetings will also be available.

Written comments on the proposed rule are also invited and should be submitted by

Oct. 11. They may be mailed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudication Staff; sent by e-mail to

SECY@nrc.gov or submitted via the NRC’s rulemaking web site at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov .

###
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6525
MAURICE VERSHAWN HOWARD, a/k/a Moe, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICKY STOWE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-662-3) Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 26, 2000Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice VerShawn Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Maurice VerShawn Howard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Howard v. Stowe , No. CA-99-662-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 297.101 Purpose and scope.

This part sets forth the regulations of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (the Office) to govern the maintenance, protection, disclosure, and amendment of records within the systems of records as defned by the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), Public Law 93-579.
### SUBCHAPTER III—ENHANCED VICTIM ASSISTANCE TO ELDER ABUSE SURVIVORS
### §191b. Collection of unpaid and underpaid royalties and late payment interest owed by lessees

Beginning in fiscal year 1996 and thereafter, the Secretary shall take appropriate action to collect unpaid and underpaid royalties and late payment interest owed by Federal and Indian mineral lessees and other royalty payors on amounts received in settlement or other resolution of disputes under, and for partial or complete termination of, sales agreements for minerals from Federal and Indian leases.

(Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title I], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–167; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 103–332, title I, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2508.
### SUBCHAPTER II—STUDY, ESTABLISHMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INSURANCE PROGRAM
**EXHIBIT 31**

I, Ruairidh Campbell certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Allied Resources, Inc.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2007 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell 

Ruairidh Campbell 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**20**

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00360-CV

Style: George M. Bishop, et al. v. Chappell Hill Service Company, LLC

and High Meadows Land & Cattle, LLC

Date motion filed*: August 14, 2014

Type of motion: Motion to Dismiss

Party filing motion: Appellee

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional 

motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal, filed within appellees’ response, is 

ordered taken with the case. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to docket the 

appellees’ response and motion to dismiss, which has been filed only as a motion,

also as appellees’ brief.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: _July 30, 2015_
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-039 September 29, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERN

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a regulatory conference with officials

of Progress Energy on Friday, October 13, in Atlanta to discuss an apparent violation of NRC

requirements at the Harris nuclear power plant, located southwest of Raleigh.

NRC and Progress Energy officials will discuss the significance of a finding involving

inadequate maintenance on a water chiller which would be needed to cool certain emergency

components designed to add water to the reactor in the event of some accident scenarios. The

maintenance problem, discovered by plant employees, resulted in this system being inoperable for

longer than allowed under the plant’s Technical Specifications. The chiller has been returned to

service and the condition no longer exists. The finding was not an immediate safety concern because

another fully redundant system was available during that time to provide cooling if needed. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded system which classifies findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of

safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that this issue at Harris is “white,”

meaning it is of low to moderate safety significance.

The meeting is scheduled for 10:15 a.m. in the NRC’s Region II office, located on the 24th floor

of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street SW in Atlanta. The public is invited to observe and

will have one or more opportunities to talk with NRC officials after the business portion, but before the

meeting is adjourned. Persons wishing to participate in this meeting by toll-free audio teleconference

should contact the NRC’s Son Ninh at 404-562-4532 or SON@nrc.gov .

No decisions on final safety significance, any apparent violations or possible enforcement

action will be made at the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's web site.
FILED 

MAY 1 1 2016 

101 1947A 

rTha-W, 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

FELTON L. MATTHEWS, JR., No, 70256 

Appellant, 

vs. 

LAS VEGAS JUSTICE COURT, LAS 

VEGAS TOWNSHIP; LAS VEGAS 

JUSTICE COURT CLERK 

DEPARTMENT 7; WARDEN D. NEVEN; 

TRINITY PHARRIS; SGT. KIM; SGT. 

SHIELDS; CO COIN; CO CROPPER; CO 

JAMES WILSON; CO J. 

HOLLINGSWORTH; CO J. RIGNEY; 

SKY HOFFMAN; CO A. SAUNDERS: 

DIRECTOR JAMES G COX; THE 

STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS; THE STATE OF 

NEVADA; AND SKYE HOMAN, 

Respondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from an order granting a motion for 

summary judgment and dismissing appellant's petition for a writ of 

mandamus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joanna 

Kishner, Judge. 

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant 

to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears the 

district court has not yet entered a final written order, and the notice of 

appeal was prematurely filed. The district court held its hearing on April 

5, 2016, at which time it dismissed the case. To date no written order 

appears to have been entered. Thus, this appeal is premature and we lack 

jurisdiction over the appeal at this time. See NRAP 4(a)(6) (providing that 

"[a] premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 
s qAdr, 91 J 

Douglas 

jurisdiction" and that this court "may dismiss as premature a notice of 

appeal filed after the oral pronouncement of a decision or order but before 

entry of the written judgment or order"); Rust v. Clark Cnty. Sch. Dist., 

103 Nev. 686, 688-89, 747 P.2d 1380, 1381-82 (1987) (explaining that oral 

rulings are ineffective for appeal purposes and that a written order or 

judgment must be filed before a district court ruling can be appealed). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge 

Felton L. Matthews, Jr. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

MI I 907A 0/W
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2014 - 0333 Directorate ID : 2013 - SW - 025 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters (Previously Eurocopter France) Model EC225LP, AS332C, AS332L , AS332L 1, and AS332L2 Helicopters Number o f Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 19 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent loss of the hydraulic system in the main gearbox compartment and consequently , loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopte r $ 2,000 for the replacement Labor per Helicopter ( 1.5 work - hour x 

### $ 8 5 /work hour per inspection ) (2.5 work - hour x 

### $85/work hour for the replacement) $ 128 $213 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 128 per inspection $2,213 for the replac ement Total US Fleet Cost $2,432 per an inspection Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Rao Edupuganti
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10220 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

IGNACIO MOROLES, JR.

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 34

- 2

Before JONES, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ignacio Moroles, Jr.,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moroles h a s not filed a respon se. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 20, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10220 Document: 00514279703 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/20/2017No. 17

- 10220

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-10220 Document: 00514279703 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/20/2017
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.606 Noncompetitive appointment of certain present and former Foreign Service officers and employees. Subject to the conditions prescribed by OPM, an agency may appoint noncompetitively a present or former career officer or employee of the Foreign Service who was appointed under authority of the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as amended (22 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.*), or legislation that supplements or replaces that Act, if: ( a ) He qualifies under the requirements set forth in Executive Order 11219, and
( b ) OPM has concurred in his present or former agency's plan, and substantive changes thereto, for noncompetitive entry of civil service employees into the Foreign Service positions of that agency.
[33 FR 12418, Sept. 4, 1968, as amended at 66 FR 66710, Dec. 27, 2001]
# United States Court of Appeals F or the Se ven th C ir cu it Ch i cago ,I l l i nois 6 0604 J uly 8, 20 09
B efo re M IC H A E L S. K A N N E , Cir cu i tJudg e D IA N E P . W O O D , Cir cu i tJudg e D IA N E S. SY K E S, Cir cu i tJudg e
N o. 08- 1416 L E SL E Y C. STE PH E N S ,

P laint if f-A ppell ant, v. C H A R L E S E R IC K SO N , et a l.,

D efend a nts-A pp ellees
. A pp ealf ro m the U ni ted S tat es Dist ri ct Court f orthe N or ther n Dis tr i ct o f I l l i no i s, Ea st er n Di vi si o n. N o. 06 C 0176 W il li am J . H ibbler, J udg e . O R D E R The sl i p opi ni on i ssued i n the abov e- enti tl ed cause on J une 30, 20 09, i s a m ended on page 1 to r efl ect the deci ded date as J une 30, 20 09.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                             Office of Public Affairs, Region I

                                        475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.www.nrc.gov 

No. I-07-010   March 23, 2007Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330   Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

STOLEN NUCLEAR GAUGE FOUND IN PHILADELPHIA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been notified that a nuclear gauge reported stolenfrom a construction site in Philadelphia on Monday has been located at a facility in the city’s Nicetownsection.  The gauge was found yesterday morning at Nicetown Salvage Co. on Germantown Avenuenear Lycoming Street.  Radiation surveys conducted by the NRC and the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection did not detect contamination in the building.  At no time was public healthand safety in danger. 

The gauge, containing small amounts of radioactive material, is used for industrial purposessuch as measuring the density of soil at construction sites.  On Monday (March 19), UnderwoodEngineering, of Belmar, N.J., reported the gauge and its bright-yellow transportation case were stolenfrom a truck parked at a construction site at 3301 Tasker St., Philadelphia.    

Underwood Engineering is arranging to recover the gauge.  NRC inspectors will monitor theremoval of the gauge and will also confirm that all radioactive material has been removed.  In themeantime, the gauge is safely stored inside the salvage company building.  Access to the building isbeing controlled.   Five individuals who were in the building were taken to the hospital yesterday as aprecaution.  The hospital verified that they were not contaminated. 

The NRC will conduct a follow-up inspection at Underwood Engineering to determine whetherthe gauge owner had implemented all regulatory requirements to minimize the potential for theft and toassure that appropriate actions are taken to prevent recurrence. 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §1231a. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–282, title VI, §601(c)(6)(A), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4290

Section, Pub. L. 96–380, Oct. 6, 1980, 94 Stat. 1521; Pub. L. 97–322, title I, §118(d), Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1587; Pub. L. 98–557, §16(a), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2866; Pub. L. 101–225, title I, §105(b), Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1910; Pub. L. 104–324, title III, §304(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3917; Pub. L. 107–295, title III, §336, Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2105; Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, §418(g), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1049; Pub. L. 111–281, title VI, §621(e), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2976, established the Towing Safety Advisory Committee. See section 15108 of Title 46, Shipping.