alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 12 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01571
- CV
JOANN SEMPLE AND CAR OL MATTHEWS, Appellant s V. FRED VINCENT, Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 11180



### O RDER
We GRANT appellants’ October 5, 2016 motion to extend time to filed their brief and
ORDER the brief received by the Court on September 30, 2016 filed as of the date of this order

. We STRIKE appellants’ previous briefs, filed June 2, 2016 and September 26, 2016. Appellee’s brief is due November 14, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
§ 551.424 Time spent adjusting grievances or performing representational functions. ( a ) Time spent by an employee adjusting his or her grievance (or any appealable action) with an agency during the time the employee is required to be on the agency's premises shall be considered hours of work.
( b ) “Official time” granted an employee by an agency to perform representational functions during those hours when the employee is otherwise in a duty status shall be considered hours of work. This includes time spent by an employee performing such functions during regular working hours (including regularly scheduled overtime hours), or during a period of irregular, unscheduled overtime work, provided an event arises incident to representational functions that must be dealt with during the irregular, unscheduled overtime period.
Request for Information Jackson and Sons Commercial Photographers (FAA-2015-

3665) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Jackson: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−3665). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your

petition.

z Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by December 22, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–2999.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 9:30 AM 

To: jrjackson3@gmail.com
### §10595. Reports

An entity that receives a grant under this subchapter during a fiscal year shall submit to the Attorney General, not later than a date specified by the Attorney General, a report that describes and evaluates the effectiveness of that program during such fiscal year that—

(1) is based on evidence-based data; and

(2) uses the methods and measurements described in the application of that entity for purposes of evaluating that program.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2925, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §113, Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797s–4 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Construction of 2008 Amendment

For construction of amendments by Pub. L. 110–199 and requirements for grants made under such amendments, see section 60504 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Joseph D. Bedle for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted. Present — Janks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 171

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the provision that 

limited the interest deduction on refinanced home mortgage indebtedness 

to the amount of the indebtedness being refinanced. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2003

Mr. REYNOLDS (for himself and Mrs. MYRICK) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the provision that limited the interest deduction on refinanced home mortgage indebtedness to the amount of 

the indebtedness being refinanced.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homeowner Refinance 

5 Fairness Act of 2003’’. 
2

•HR 171 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REFINANCING LIMITATION ON DEDUC2 TION FOR HOME MORTGAGE INTEREST. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The last sentence of section 

4 163(h)(3)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

5 amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘Such term also includes any indebtedness secured by 

7 such residence resulting from the refinancing of indebted8 ness meeting the requirements of the preceding sentence 

9 (or this sentence); but only to the extent the amount of 

10 the indebtedness resulting from such refinancing does not 

11 exceed the limitation under clause (ii).’’

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### §763–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8512(a)(12), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4759

Section, act July 9, 1956, ch. 524, 70 Stat. 510, provided for an additional increase of retired pay.
# C_2015204EN.01000101.xml

| 20.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the amendment of Annexes II, V, VII and VIII to the Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on sanitary measures applicable to trade in live animals and animal products

(2015/C 204/01)

The internal procedures necessary for the entry into force of the Arrangement on the amendments to Annexes II, V, VII and VIII to the Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on sanitary measures applicable to trade in live animals and animal products (1), signed in Brussels on 17 December 1996, have been completed. The European Union and New Zealand notified each other thereof by exchanges of letters of the European Union to New Zealand on 23 March 2015 and of New Zealand to the European Union on 31 March 2015. In accordance with Article 18(3) of the Agreement, this amending Arrangement entered into force on 1 April 2015.

1

---

(1)  Council Decision 97/132/EC of 17 December 1996 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on sanitary measures applicable to trade in live animals and animal products (OJ L 57, 26.2.1997, p. 4).

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 and S-8 (No. 333-87555 and No. 333-70478, respectively)
of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation of our report dated January 25, 2002,
except for the last paragraph of Note 5 as to which the date is February 28,
2002 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report
to Shareholders, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 15, 2002
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 16, 2019

NO. 03-18-00064-CV

Ashley Gail Matusek, Appellant

v.

James Charles Twine, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the modification order signed by the trial court on November 1, 2017. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
§ 251.201 Associations of management officials and/or supervisors. ( a ) As part of agency management, supervisors and managers should be included in the decision-making process and notified of executive-level decisions on a timely basis. Each agency must establish and maintain a system for intra-management communication and consultation with its supervisors and managers. Agencies must also establish consultative relationships with associations whose membership is primarily composed of Federal supervisory and/or managerial personnel, provided that such associations are not affiliated with any labor organization and that they have sufficient agency membership to assure a worthwhile dialogue with executive management. Consultative relationships with other non-labor organizations representing Federal employees are discretionary.
( b ) Consultations should have as their objectives the improvement of managerial effectiveness and the working conditions of supervisors and managers, as well as the identification and resolution of problems affecting agency operations and employees, including supervisors and managers.
( c ) The system of communication and consultation should be designed so that individual supervisors and managers are able to participate if they are not affiliated with an association of management officials and/or supervisors. At the same time, the voluntary joining together of supervisory and management personnel in groups of associations shall not be precluded or discouraged.
# L_2015230EN.01004101.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 234/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1458]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 245/2014 of 13 March 2014 amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 245/2014 of 13 March 2014 amending Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66ne (Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0245: Commission Regulation (EU) No 245/2014 of 13 March 2014 (OJ L 74, 14.3.2014, p. 33).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0245: Commission Regulation (EU) No 245/2014 of 13 March 2014 (OJ L 74, 14.3.2014, p. 33).’.

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 245/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 74, 14.3.2014, p. 33.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Martin Herskovitz v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Péek, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Van Yoorhis, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 584.]
§ 1303.30 Responsibility for responding to requests. ( a ) *Search cutoff date.* In determining which records are responsive to a request, OMB ordinarily will include only records in its possession as of the date that it begins its search. If any other date is used, OMB will inform the requester of that date.
( b ) *Transfer of records to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).* Permanent records of OMB which have been transferred to the control of NARA under the Federal Records Act are not in the control of OMB and are therefore not accessible by a FOIA request to OMB. Requests for such records should be directed to NARA.
( c ) *Consultation and referral.* When reviewing records, OMB will determine whether another agency of the Federal Government is better able to determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure under the FOIA. As to any such record, OMB will proceed in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) *Consultation.* When records contain information of interest to another agency, OMB typically will consult with that agency prior to making a release determination.
( 2 ) *Referral.* ( i ) When OMB believes that a different agency is best able to determine whether to disclose the record, OMB will refer the responsibility for responding to the request regarding that record to that agency, will notify the requester, and will inform them of the agency which will be processing the record, including that agency's FOIA contact information. Ordinarily, the agency that originated the record is best situated to make the disclosure determination. However, if OMB and the originating agency jointly agree that OMB is in the best position to respond regarding the record, then OMB may respond to the requester.
( ii ) When OMB believes that a different agency is best able to determine whether to disclose the record, but also believes that disclosure of the identity of the different agency could harm an interest protected by an applicable FOIA exemption, such as the exemptions that protect personal privacy or national security interests, OMB will coordinate with the originating agency to seek its views on the disclosability of the record and convey the release determination for the record that is the subject of the coordination to the requester. For example, if a non-law enforcement agency responding to a request for records on a living third party locates within its files records originating with a law enforcement agency, and if the existence of that law enforcement interest in the third party was not publicly known, then to disclose that law enforcement interest could cause an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of the third party. Similarly, if an agency locates within its files material originating with an Intelligence Community agency, and the involvement of that agency in the matter is classified and not publicly acknowledged, then to disclose or give attribution to the involvement of that Intelligence Community agency could cause national security harms.
[84 FR 22951, May 21, 2019, as amended at 89 FR 48825, June 10, 2024]
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. §
1350



I, Arthur Nguyen, the chief financial officer of
Tvia, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of
my knowledge,




(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K
for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and




(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By/s/ Arthur
Nguyen Arthur Nguyen




June 21, 2004


---
§ 530.322 Setting pay when a special rate schedule is newly established or increased. ( a ) *General rule.* When an employee holds a position that becomes covered by a newly established special rate schedule (including a schedule for which coverage is expanded) or increased special rate schedule (including an increased special rate range within a schedule), the agency must set the employee's special rate at the step (or relative position in range for a GM employee) of the grade on the new special rate schedule that corresponds to the employee's existing numerical step (or relative position in range for a GM employee) as in effect immediately before the new special rate schedule takes effect, except as otherwise provided in this section. The corresponding special rate is determined by adding the applicable special rate supplement on top of the employee's GS rate, subject to the limitation that no special rate may exceed the rate for level IV of the Executive Schedule. For an employee receiving an LEO special base rate, add the applicable special rate supplement to the GS rate for the employee's grade and step, except as otherwise provided under § 530.304(d).
( b ) *Employee entitled to a higher rate of basic pay.* As provided in § 530.303(d), if an employee meeting the coverage conditions for a newly established or increased special rate schedule is entitled to a higher rate of basic pay under other legal authority, the employee must be paid at that higher rate.
( c ) *Employee receiving a retained rate.* When an employee is receiving a retained rate immediately before the employee's position is covered by a newly established or increased special rate schedule, the agency must determine the employee's rate of pay consistent with the requirements in 5 CFR part 536, subpart C (or 5 CFR 359.705 for a former member of the Senior Executive Service receiving a retained rate under that section).
[70 FR 31287, May 31, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 66151, Nov. 7, 2008]
§ 591.103 Governmentwide maximum uniform allowance rate. Unless a higher initial maximum uniform allowance rate is payable under § 591.104 to an employee who is required by statute, regulation, or an agency's written administrative procedures to wear a uniform, the head of each agency concerned, out of funds available, shall— ( a ) Pay an allowance for a uniform not to exceed $800 a year; or
( b ) Furnish a uniform at a cost not to exceed $800 a year.
( c ) Any agency which provides a uniform allowance under paragraph (a) of this section must establish policies to administer the uniform allowance program, including uniform standards acceptable to the agency.
[59 FR 43705, Aug. 25, 1994, as amended at 72 FR 20702, Apr. 26, 2007]
AN AMENDED FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT WAS NOT REQUIRED FOR NOTICE 

#2004-123
### **CHAPTER 7—REGULATIONS FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF PIRACY**

Sec.
381.
Use of public vessels to suppress piracy.
382.
Seizure of piratical vessels generally.
383.
Resistance of pirates by merchant vessels.
384.
Condemnation of piratical vessels.
385.
Seizure and condemnation of vessels fitted out for piracy.
386.
Commissioning private vessels for seizure of piratical vessels.
387.
Duties of officers of customs and marshals as to seizure.
### §594. When immediate possession of land may be taken

Whenever the Secretary of the Army, in pursuance of authority conferred on him by law, causes proceedings to be instituted in the name of the United States for the acquirement by condemnation of any lands, easements, or rights of way needed for a work of river and harbor improvements duly authorized by Congress, the United States, upon the filing of the petition in any such proceedings, shall have the right to take immediate possession of said lands, easements, or rights-of-way, to the extent of the interest to be acquired, and proceed with such public works thereon as have been authorized by Congress: Provided, That certain and adequate provision shall have been made for the payment of just compensation to the party or parties entitled thereto, either by previous appropriation by the United States or by the deposit of moneys or other form of security in such amount and form as shall be approved by the court in which such proceedings shall be instituted. The respondent or respondents may move at any time in the court to increase or change the amounts or securities, and the court shall make such order as shall be just in the premises and as shall adequately protect the respondents. In every case the proceedings in condemnation shall be diligently prosecuted on the part of the United States in order that such compensation may be promptly ascertained and paid.

(July 18, 1918, ch. 155, §5, 40 Stat. 911; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act July 18, 1918, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1918".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
### §2315b. Transparency and accountability in cost sharing for water resources development projects

#### (a) Definition of balance sheet

In this section, the term "balance sheet" means a document that describes—

(1) the funds provided by each Federal and non-Federal interest for a water resources development project; and

(2) the status of those funds.

#### (b) Establishment of balance sheet

Each district of the Corps of Engineers shall, using the authority of the Secretary under section 2315 of this title—

(1) maintain a balance sheet for each water resources development project carried out by the Secretary for which a non-Federal cost share is required; and

(2) on request of a non-Federal interest that provided funds for the project, provide to the non-Federal interest a copy of the balance sheet.

#### (c) Under-budget projects

In the case of a water resources development project carried out by the Secretary that is completed at a cost less than the estimated cost, the Secretary shall transfer any excess non-Federal funds to the non-Federal interest in accordance with the cost-share requirement applicable to the project.

(Pub. L. 115–270, title I, §1120, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3777.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, and also as part of the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 102 of Pub. L. 115–270, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.