alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 531.504 Level of performance required for quality step increase. A quality step increase shall not be required but may be granted only to— ( a ) An employee who receives a rating of record at Level 5 (“Outstanding” or equivalent), as defined in part 430, subpart B, of this chapter; or
( b ) An employee who, when covered by a performance appraisal program that does not use a Level 5 summary— ( 1 ) Receives a rating of record at the highest summary level used by the program; and
( 2 ) Demonstrates sustained performance of high quality significantly above that expected at the “Fully Successful” level in the type of position concerned, as determined under performance-related criteria established by the agency.
[60 FR 43948, Aug. 23, 1995]
### §2315a. Transparency in accounting and administrative expenses

On the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall provide to the non-Federal interest a detailed accounting of the Federal expenses associated with a water resources project.

(Pub. L. 113–121, title I, §1012(a), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1218.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 113–121, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
§ 1312.28 Transmission of classified material. Prior to the transmission of classified material to offices outside OMB, such material will be enclosed in opaque inner and outer covers or envelopes. The inner cover will be sealed and marked with the classification, and the address of the sender and of the addressee. The receipt for the document, OMB Form 87, (not required for Confidential material) will be attached to or placed within the inner envelope to be signed by the recipient and returned to the sender. Receipts will identify the sender, the addressee, and the document, and will contain no classified information. The outer cover or envelope will be sealed and addressed with no identification of its contents. ( a ) *Transmittal of Top Secret material.* The transmittal of Top Secret material shall be by personnel specifically designated by the EOP Security Officer, or by Department of State diplomatic pouch, by a messenger-courier system specifically created for that purpose. Alternatively, it shall be taken to the White House Situation Room for transmission over secure communications circuits.
( b ) *Transmittal of Secret material.* The transmittal of Secret material shall be as follows: ( 1 ) Within and between the fifty States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico: Use one of the authorized means for Top Secret material, or transmit by U.S. Postal Service express or registered mail.
( 2 ) Other Areas. Use the same means authorized for Top Secret, or transmit by U.S. registered mail through Military Postal Service facilities.
( c ) *Transmittal of Confidential material.* As identified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, or transmit by U.S. Postal Service Certified, first class, or express mail service within and between the fifty States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
( d ) *Transmittal between OMB offices and within the EOP complex.* Classified material will normally be hand carried within and between offices in the Executive Office of the President complex by cleared OMB employees. Documents so carried must be protected by the appropriate cover sheet or outer envelope. Top Secret material will always be hand carried in this manner. Secret and Confidential material may be transmitted between offices in the EOP complex by preparing the material as indicated above (double envelope) and forwarding it by special messenger service provided by the messenger center. The messenger shall be advised that the material is classified. Receipts shall be obtained if Top Secret or Secret material is being transmitted outside of OMB. Classified material will never be transmitted in the Standard Messenger Envelope (SF Form 65), or by the Mail Stop system.
#### Grace E. Connolly, Appellant-Respondent, v. Rosalie Jones et al., as Sole Surviving Executrices and Trustees under the Will of Mary E. Jones, Deceased, et al., Respondents; T. Everett C. Tuthill, et al., Individually and as Members of Board of Supervisors of the County of Suffolk, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motions for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following questions are certified: (1) Was the order of the Special Term dated June 30, 1947, resettling an order dated May 15, 1947, and dismissing the complaint as against defendants Rosalie Jones, and Louise E. Jones, as sole surviving executrices and trustees under the last will and testament of Mary E. Jones, deceased, properly made? (2) Was the order of the Special Term dated May 15, 1947, granting a motion by defendant Town of Huntington to dismiss the complaint as against it, properly made? (3) Was the order.of the Special Term dated May 15, 1947, denying a motion by defendants-appellants T. Everett C. Tuthill, et al., individually and as members of the Board of Supervisors, and Milton L. Burns, as County Treasurer, to dismiss the complaint as against them, properly made? Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 904.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.902 Definitions.

In this subpart—

*Act* means the Panama Canal Act of 1979 (22 U.S.C. 3601 *et seq.*).

*Agency* means an Executive agency, the United States Postal Service, and the Smithsonian Institution.

*Commission* means the Panama Canal Commission as established by section 1101 of the Act.

*Competitive area* is defined in § 351.402 of part 351 of this chapter.

*Competitive level* is defined in § 351.403(a) of part 351 of this chapter.

*Detail* is the assignment of loan of an employee to the Commission without the employee's transfer. The employee remains an employee of the agency in which employed and continues to be the incumbent of the position from which detailed.

*Term of employment* means the period of employment specified in the written agreement between the Commission and the agency for the transfer of an employee or extension of transfer.

*Transfer* means the change in appointment of an employee from an agency to a new appointment with the Commission.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7509

DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-94-177-2)

Submitted: September 16, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation and granting the

Defendants' motion for summary judgment on his complaint filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), in which he alleged that the United

States Drug Enforcement Agency violated his due process rights by

failing to provide adequate notice of forfeiture. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Fleming v. United States, No. CA-94-177-2 (M.D.N.C. July 24,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,070,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,896
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,155,983
<PP&E>                                         220,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,167
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,292,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,511
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,155
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,140,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,292,860
<SALES>                                          1,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,120
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,017,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,771,189)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,771,189)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,771,189)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
#### § 5001.101 General.

In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to members and other employees of the Interstate Commerce Commission and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. In addition to the standards in 5 CFR part 2635 and this part, members and other employee are subject to the executive branch financial disclosure regulations contained in 5 CFR part 2635 and to additional regulations regarding their conduct contained in 49 CFR part 1019.
#### Jack Lantz, Respondent, v. Rae Lantz, Appellant.

Insofar as the court disposed of the application to vacate the interlocutory judgment and vacate defendant’s default with permission to answer, we think the disposition was proper. There are circumstances referred to in the present case however, which indicate that some further action might be considered with respect to the custody of the children. Order unanimously modified by referring the matter back to Special Term to determine whether such action is necessary and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Breitel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 837.]
§ 511.603 Right to appeal. ( a ) *Employee appeal.* An employee, or the employee's designated representative acting on behalf of an employee, may request an Office decision as to: ( 1 ) The appropriate occupational series or grade of the employee's official position.
( 2 ) The inclusion under or exclusion from chapter 51 of title 5, United States Code, of the official position by the employee's agency or the Office, except in the case of a position located in the Office of the Architect of the Capitol.
( b ) *Agency appeal.* The head of an agency, or an authorized representative, may appeal any classification certificate issued by the Office under sections 5103 or 5110 of title 5, U.S.C., with respect to any position in the agency.
#### Mary L. Clark, Respondent, v. James M. Clark, Appellant, and Hudson Iron Company, Respondent.

Appeal withdrawn on condition that within ten days after the entry of this order the appellant pay the costs and disbursements of said appeal as taxed to each of the respondents; in default thereof, the motion to withdraw the appeal is denied. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65182-65183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Efficacy Task Force, LLC

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 14, 2018, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Efficacy Task Force, LLC 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities 
of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the 
venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the 
Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: BASF Corporation, Florham Park, NJ; Bayer Animal 
Health, Shawnee, KS; Central Garden & Pet Company, Schaumburg, IL; 
Control Solutions, Inc., Pasadena, TX; FMC Corporation, Philadelphia, 
PA; McLaughlin Gormley King Company (MGK), Minneapolis, MN; SC Johnson 
& Son, Inc., Racine, WI; Sergeant's Pet Care Products, Inc., Omaha, NE; 
United Industries Corporation, Earth City, MO; and W.F. Young, Inc., 
East Longmeadow, MA. The general area of Efficacy Task Force, LLC's 
planned activity is to reach agreement with the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (``EPA'') on data required for the reregistration of 
Cyfluthrin; MGK264; Permethrin; Phenothrin; Piperonyl Butoxide (PBO); 
Pyrethrins (PY); PY/PBO/MGK264/(S)-Methoprene/Tetramethrin Blend; PY/
PBO/MGK264/(S)-Methoprene Blend; PY/PBO/MGK264/Tetramethrin Blend; PY/
PBO Blends; Pyripoxyfen; and Tetramethrin (the ``Products''); to 
develop and own written procedural methods for the development of such 
data; to engage in advocacy before EPA, State and local governments, as 
appropriate, in support of the registration, sale, distribution, and 
use of the Products; and to protect

[[Page 65183]]

the proprietary interest in the procedural methods and existing data 
including, but not limited to, seeking and collecting data compensation 
from non-members of the Efficacy Task Force, LLC who may seek to rely 
upon the data and procedural methods to support their registrations, to 
the extent permitted by FIFRA or the data compensation laws of non-U.S. 
jurisdictions.

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-27459 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
### §2282e. Post-authorization change reports

#### (a) In general

The completion of a post-authorization change report prepared by the Corps of Engineers for a water resources development project—

(1) may not be delayed as a result of consideration being given to changes in policy or priority with respect to project consideration; and

(2) shall be submitted, upon completion, to—

(A) the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives.

#### (b) Completion review

With respect to a post-authorization change report subject to review by the Secretary, the Secretary shall, not later than 120 days after the date of completion of such report—

(1) review the report; and

(2) provide to Congress any recommendations of the Secretary regarding modification of the applicable water resources development project.

#### (c) Prior reports

Not later than 120 days after December 16, 2016, with respect to any post-authorization change report that was completed prior to December 16, 2016, and is subject to a review by the Secretary that has yet to be completed, the Secretary shall complete review of, and provide recommendations to Congress with respect to, the report.

#### (d) Post-authorization change report inclusions

In this section, the term "post-authorization change report" includes—

(1) a general reevaluation report;

(2) a limited reevaluation report; and

(3) any other report that recommends the modification of an authorized water resources development project.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1132, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1653.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 114–322, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
#### § 410.503 Records.

An agency shall maintain, in such form and manner as the agency head considers appropriate, the following records in connection with each contribution, awards, or payment made and accepted under authority of this section: The recipient's name; the organization's name; the amount and nature of the contribution, award, or payment and the purpose for which it is to be used; and a copy of the written authorization required by § 410.502(a).
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

TSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended                         Six Months Ended
                                         Oct. 26, 1996        Oct. 28, 1995          Oct. 26, 1996       Oct. 28, 1995
                                         -------------        -------------          -------------       -------------
                                                   (Expressed in Thousands Except Per Share Data)
<S>                                      <C>                    <C>                     <C>                  <C>
PRIMARY
    Average shares outstanding                  15,423              15,297                   15,423              15,054
    Net effect of dilutive stock
       options and warrants                          0                 684                      608                 857
                                          ------------          ----------              -----------          ----------

       TOTAL                                    15,423              15,981                   16,031              15,911
                                          ============          ==========              ===========          ==========


Net Income                                $        (35)              3,734                    3,461               6,936
                                          ============          ==========              ===========          ==========

Net Income per share                      $        ---                 .23                      .22                 .44
                                          ============          ==========              ===========          ==========



FULLY DILUTED
    Average shares outstanding                  15,423              15,297                   15,423              15,054
    Net effect of dilutive stock
       options and warrants                          0                 765                      642                 988
                                          ------------          ----------              -----------          ----------

       TOTAL                                    15,423              16,062                   16,065              16,042
                                          ============          ==========              ===========          ==========


Net Income                                $        (35)              3,734                    3,461               6,936
                                          ============          ==========              ===========          ==========

Net Income per share                      $        ---                 .23                      .22                 .43
                                          ============          ==========              ===========          ==========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Jay S. Yoo, President and Chief Executive
Officer, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hanmi Financial Corporation; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |                                       |  | 
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: |  | April 30, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Jay S. Yoo                        |  | 
|      |  |                |  |  |  | Jay S. Yoo                            |  | 
|      |  |                |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer |  |
**Exhibit
      32**








The
      following certification accompanies and is furnished in connection with
      Firstwave Technologies, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended March 31, 2006 and is not considered as “filed” as provided in SEC Release
      No’s 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967.











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





The
      undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the
                “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the
                “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








Dated:
              May 12, 2006
            /s/
                Richard T. Brock


Richard
      T. Brock


Chief
      Executive Officer











Dated:
              May 12, 2006
            /s/
                David G. Kane


David
      G.
      Kane


Controller


(Principal
      Financial Officer)










A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Firstwave Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Firstwave Technologies,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.