alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §985. Bonds; issuance; maturity; redemption; interest; purchase of obligations by Secretary of the Treasury

(a) To finance its activities, the Corporation may issue revenue bonds payable from corporate revenue to the Secretary of the Treasury. The total face value of all bonds so issued shall not be greater than $140,000,000. Not more than fifty per centum of the bonds may be issued during any one year. Such obligations shall have maturities agreed upon by the Corporation and the Secretary of the Treasury, not in excess of fifty years. Such obligations may be redeemable at the option of the Corporation before maturity in such manner as may be stipulated in such obligations, but the obligations thus redeemed shall not be refinanced by the Corporation. The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to purchase any obligations of the Corporation to be issued hereunder and for such purpose the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to use as a public debt transaction the proceeds from the sale of any securities issued under chapter 31 of title 31, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under chapter 31 of title 31 are extended to include any purchases of the Corporation's obligations hereunder.

(b) Effective as of October 21, 1970, the obligations of the Corporation incurred under subsection (a) of this section shall bear no interest, and the obligation of the Corporation to pay the unpaid interest which has accrued on such obligations is terminated.

(May 13, 1954, ch. 201, §5, 68 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 85–108, §1(4), July 17, 1957, 71 Stat. 307; Pub. L. 91–469, §43(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1038.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "chapter 31 of title 31" substituted for "the Second Liberty Bond Act, as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Amendments

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–469, §43(a)(1), designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and struck out fourth, fifth, and eighth sentences which provided for deferral, with approval of Secretary of the Treasury, of interest payments on bonds but required interest payments so deferred to bear interest after June 30, 1960; prohibited charging of deferred interest against debt limitation of $140,000,000; and prescribed for each obligation a rate of interest determined by the Secretary, taking into consideration the current average rate on current marketable obligations of the United States of comparable maturities as of the last day of the month preceding the issuance of the obligation of the Corporation.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 91–469, §43(a)(2), added subsec. (b).

1957—Pub. L. 85–108 increased Corporation's borrowing authority from $105,000,000 to $140,000,000; omitted first year bond issue limitation, and raised limits of bond issues for any year from 40 to 50 per centum of total borrowing power; and authorized deferment of interest payments on borrowings, excluding such deferred interest charges from the debt limitation of $140,000,000.
§ 2638.208 Written guidance on the executive branch ethics program. This section describes several means by which the Office of Government Ethics provides agencies, employees, and the public with written guidance regarding its legal interpretations, program requirements, and educational offerings. Normally, written guidance is published on the official website of the Office of Government Ethics, *www.oge.gov .* ( a ) *Legal advisories.* The Office of Government Ethics issues legal advisories, which are memoranda regarding the interpretation of government ethics laws and regulations. They are intended primarily to provide education and notice to executive branch ethics officials; prospective, current, and former executive branch employees; and individuals who interact with the executive branch.
( b ) *Program advisories.* The Office of Government Ethics issues program advisories, which are memoranda regarding the requirements or procedures applicable to the executive branch ethics program and individual agency ethics programs. They are intended primarily to instruct agencies on uniform procedures for the executive branch ethics program.
( c ) *Informal advisory opinions.* Upon request or upon its own initiative, the Office of Government Ethics issues informal advisory opinions. Informal advisory opinions address subjects that in the opinion of the Director do not meet the criteria for issuance of formal advisory opinions. They are intended primarily to provide guidance to individuals and illustrate the application of government ethics laws and regulations to specific circumstances.
[86 FR 63308, Nov. 16, 2021]
§ 2610.108 Rulemaking on maximum rate for attorney and agent fees. ( a ) If warranted by an increase in the cost of living or by special circumstances (such as limited availability of attorneys or agents qualified to handle certain types of proceedings), the Office may adopt regulations providing that attorney or agent fees may be awarded at a rate higher than $125.00 per hour in some or all of the types of proceedings covered by this part. The Office will conduct any rulemaking proceedings for this purpose under the informal rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553.
( b ) Any person may file with the Office a petition for rulemaking to increase the maximum rate for attorney or agent fees as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(A)(ii). The petition should identify the rate the petitioner believes the Office should establish and the types of proceedings in which the rate should be used. It should also explain fully the reasons why the higher rate is warranted. The Office will respond to the petition within 60 days after it is filed, by initiating a rulemaking proceeding, denying the petition, or taking other appropriate action.
[57 FR 33268, July 28, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 13116, Mar. 18, 1998]
#### David Levy et al., Appellants, *v.*Solomon Loeb et al., Respondents.

(Argued November 26, 1878;

decided December 10, 1878.)

*Lewis Sanders*for appellants.

*Wheeler De F. Edwards*for respondents.

Agree to affirm without opinion.

All concur.

Order affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62123-62124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21614]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 70

[Regional Docket No. II-2016-01; FRL-9952-01-Region 2]

Petition To Reopen State Operating Permit; NY; Seneca Energy II, 
LLC

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 
70.8(d), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an Order, dated July 29, 2016, denying a petition filed by Finger Lakes 
Zero Waste Coalition, Inc., dated February 8, 2016, asking the EPA to 
``reopen'' the Title V operating permit, Permit No. 8-3244-00040/00002, 
issued by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 
(DEC) to Seneca Energy II, LLC (Seneca) relating to the Ontario County 
Landfill Gas-to-

[[Page 62124]]

Energy Facility in western New York. The process by which the EPA may 
initiate the reopening process for such a title V permit is explained 
at 40 CFR 70.7(g)(1).

DATES: Any such petition for review of this Order filed under the CAA 
must be received by November 7, 2016 pursuant to section 307 of the 
CAA.

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final Order, the petitions, and 
other supporting information during normal business hours at EPA Region 
2, 290 Broadway, New York, New York. If you wish to examine these 
documents, you should make an appointment at least 24 hours before the 
visiting day.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Riva, Chief, Permitting 
Section, Air Programs Branch, Clean Air and Sustainability Division, 
EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007, 
telephone (212) 637-4074, email address: riva.steven@epa.gov, or the 
above EPA Region 2 address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the context of a petition to reopen, the 
threshold determination is the Administrator's ``find[ing] that cause 
exists to terminate, modify, or revoke and reissue a permit'' pursuant 
to 40 CFR 70.7(f). If, and only if, the Administrator makes that 
finding, the EPA ``will notify'' the relevant entities to initiate the 
reopening process. In light of the discretionary threshold finding 
applicable to reopening for cause by the EPA, a petition to reopen a 
title V permit should present evidence (e.g., factual information, 
citation, analysis) explaining why there is cause to reopen the title V 
permit pursuant to 40 CFR 70.7(f). In this instance, the Petitioner has 
not presented sufficient evidence that the title V permit fails to 
comply with the CAA, or that it should be reopened for cause pursuant 
to 40 CFR 70.7(f).

    Dated: August 29, 2016.
Catherine McCabe,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2016-21614 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
§ 532.249 Minimum rates for hard-to-fill positions. ( a ) The lead agency for a wage area may establish the rate of the second, third, fourth, or fifth step of one or more grades of an occupation as the mandatory minimum rate or rates payable by any agency for the occupation at one or more locations within a wage area based on findings that: ( 1 ) The hiring rates prevailing for an occupation in private sector establishments in the wage area are higher than the rate of the first step of the grade or grades of the occupation; and
( 2 ) Federal installations and activities in the wage area are unable to recruit qualified employees at the rate of the first step of the grade or grades of the occupation.
( b ) Any authorizations made under paragraph (a) of this section shall be indicated on the regular wage schedule for the wage area.
( c ) Any authorizations made under paragraph (a) of this section shall be terminated with the issuance of a new regular wage schedule unless the conditions that warrant the authorizations continue and the new regular wage schedule continues that authorization.
( d ) The lead agency, prior to terminating any authorization made under paragraph (a) of this section, shall require the appropriate official or officials at all installations or activities to which the authorization applies to discuss the termination with the appropriate official or officials of exclusively recognized employee organizations representing employees in the affected occupation. The agency officials shall report the results of these discussions to the lead agency.
( e ) No employee shall have his/her pay reduced because of cancellation of an authorization made under paragraph (a) of this section.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981. Redesignated at 55 FR 46141, Nov. 1, 1990]
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)



I, Allan J. Kent, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeoGlobal Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small  business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 10, 2005

/s/ Allan J. Kent

-------------------

Allan J. Kent

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sanitized Air 

Emission

Analysis
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7123

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LUIS ARIAS-BUSTAMANTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:10-cr-00021-REP-3)

Submitted: October 14, 2015 Decided: November 6, 2015

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis Arias-Bustamante, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luis Arias-Bustamante seeks to appeal his 2010 criminal 

judgment imposed following his guilty plea to attempt to possess 

with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 

21 U.S.C. § 846 (2012). In criminal cases, the defendant must 

file the notice of appeal within 14 days after the entry of 

judgment. With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable 

neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension 

of up to 30 days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 

4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 

1985).

The district court entered judgment on August 25, 2010. 

Arias-Bustamante filed his notice of appeal on July 8, 2015, 

nearly five years after entry of the criminal judgment.1 Because

Arias-Bustamante failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to 

obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal 

as untimely.2 Arias-Bustamante’s motions for appointment of 

 1 This is the date that Arias-Bustamante certifies that he 

placed the notice of appeal in the prison mail system. A pro se 

prisoner’s notice of appeal is considered filed at the moment it 

is delivered to prison authorities for mailing to the court. 

Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988); Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). 

2 We note that the appeal period in a criminal case is not a 

jurisdictional provision, but, rather, a claim-processing rule. 

United States v. Urutyan, 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009). 

Because Arias-Bustamante’s appeal is inordinately late, and its 

consideration is not in the best interest of judicial economy, 

(Continued)
3

counsel and for consideration of his notice of appeal for good 

cause are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

 

we exercise our inherent power to dismiss it. United States v. 

Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th Cir. 2008).
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adherex Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned, Rostislav Raykov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Robert Andrade, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  May
13, 2010




By:
              /s/ Rostislav RaykovRostislav
      RaykovChief
      Executive Officer




Date:  May
13, 2010




By:
              /s/ Robert AndradeRobert
      AndradeChief
      Financial Officer
§ 5501.108 Exception to the prohibition against assisting in the prosecution of claims against, or acting as an agent or attorney before, the Government, applicable only to employees assigned to federally recognized Indian tribes or Alaska Native villages or regional or village corporations pursuant to the Intergovernmental Personnel Act. ( a ) *18 U.S.C. 205 .* Section 205 of title 18 of the United States Code prohibits an employee, whether or not for compensation, from acting as an agent or attorney for anyone in a claim against the United States, or from acting in such capacity on behalf of another before any department, agency, or other specified entity, in any particular matter in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest.
( b ) *Exception applicable only to employees assigned to federally recognized Indian tribes or Alaska Native villages or regional or village corporations pursuant to the Intergovernmental Personnel Act.* Notwithstanding the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 205, the Indian Self-Determination Act (25 U.S.C. 450i(f)) authorizes Federal employees detailed or assigned to Indian tribes or Alaska Native villages or regional or village corporations, pursuant to the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (5 U.S.C. 3372), to act as agents or attorneys for, or appear on behalf of, such tribes or Alaska Native villages or corporations in connection with any matter pending before any department, agency, court, or commission, in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. Such employees must advise, in writing, the head of the agency, with which they are dealing on behalf of an Indian tribe or Alaska Native village or corporation, of any personal and substantial involvement they may have had as an officer or employee of the United States in connection with the matter concerned.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2007 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/S/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


March 16, 2007
§ 162.44 Release on payment of appraised value. ( a ) *Value exceeding $100,000.* Any offer to pay the appraised domestic value of seized property in order to obtain the immediate release of the property which was seized under the Customs laws or laws administered by Customs and exceeding $100,000 in appraised domestic value, or which was seized under the navigation laws, shall be in writing, addressed to the Commissioner of Customs, and signed by the claimant or his attorney. It shall be submitted in duplicate to the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer having jurisdiction at the port where the property was seized. Proof of ownership shall be submitted with the application if the facts in the case make such action necessary.
( b ) *Value not over $100,000* — ( 1 ) *Authority to accept offer.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is authorized to accept a written offer pursuant to section 614, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1614), to pay the appraised domestic value of property seized under the Customs laws and to release such property if: ( i ) The appraised domestic value of the seized property does not exceed $100,000.
( ii ) The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer is satisfied that the claimant has, in fact, a substantial interest in the property; and
( iii ) Entry of the seized property into the commerce of the United States is not prohibited by law.
( 2 ) *Referral of offer.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall refer to the Commissioner of Customs any offer where it appears that the claimant does not have a substantial interest in the seized property or where it appears it would not be in the best interest of the United States to accept.
( c ) *Retention of property.* The Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer shall retain custody of the property pending payment of the amount of the offer when the application is approved.
[T.D. 72-211, 37 FR 16488, Aug. 15, 1972, as amended by T.D. 74-276, 39 FR 37633, Oct. 23, 1974; T.D. 85-195, 50 FR 50289, Dec. 10, 1985; T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999]