alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-038 September 21, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO HOLD TWO PUBLIC MEETINGS SEPTEMBER 27 IN PIKETON, OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two public meetings at Piketon, Ohio, on

September 27 to discuss results of the agency’s most recent Licensee Performance Review of the

United States Enrichment Corporation’s Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant and to discuss the NRC

inspection plan for the upcoming American Centrifuge Lead Cascade Facility being built by USEC,

Inc., at the same site.

The meetings will begin at 7:00 p.m. (EST) at the Ohio State University South Centers

Auditorium, located at 1864 Shyville Road in Piketon. The NRC staff will discuss with USEC officials

the results of the agency’s review of safety performance at the plant for a period from August 8, 2004,

to July 1, 2006. The discussion will include licensee regulatory performance in the areas of Safety

Operations, Radiological Controls, Facility Support and Licensing. 

The meting will be open to observation by interested members of the public, and NRC officials

will be available to answer questions prior to its conclusion.

The NRC will conduct a second public meeting immediately following the licensee

performance review, at approximately 8:00 p.m. (EST) to discuss NRC regulation of the American

Centrifuge Lead Cascade facility, being built by USEC, Inc., at the Portsmouth plant site. The NRC

staff will discuss the agency’s inspection program for the facility and will be available to answer

questions from the public prior to the meeting’s conclusion.

The Lead Cascade project is a test and demonstration facility designed to provide information

on new American Centrifuge uranium enrichment technology.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve-listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's web site.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-046 September. 22, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DAVIS-BESSE OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET SEPT. 28 IN OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Davis-Besse Oversight Panel will meet with FirstEnergy

Nuclear Operating Company officials on Tuesday, Sept. 28, in Oak Harbor, Ohio, to review recent

operating performance and NRC inspection activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant.

The plant resumed operation in March after a two-year shutdown to replace the reactor vessel

head and make other safety system and staff performance improvements. The NRC Oversight Panel

was formed in 2002 to coordinate the agency’s regulatory activities in response to the problems at

Davis-Besse; during the shutdown and startup process it held monthly public meetings with the utility

and continues to meet approximately bimonthly.

The meeting will be held at 6 p.m. in the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, 11661 West

State Rt. 163, Oak Harbor. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and

will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is

adjourned. The staff will also be available after the meeting for informal discussions with the public.

“We expect to hear from utility officials how they assess their performance since the last

oversight panel meeting in July,” said John Grobe, Chairman of the NRC Oversight Panel. “In

addition, we will discuss the independent performance assessments being performed at the plant as

well as findings of recent NRC inspections.”

A transcript of the oversight panel meeting will be posted in several weeks on the NRC's web

site - http://www.nrc.gov. Select "Davis-Besse/Reactor Vessel Head Degradation" from the Key

Topics menu.

The NRC oversight panel includes NRC managers and staff from offices in Lisle, Illinois;

Rockville, Maryland; and the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site.

 # # #
§ 2608.401 Penalties. ( a ) An employee who discloses official records or information or gives testimony relating to official information, except as expressly authorized by OGE or as ordered by a Federal court after OGE has had the opportunity to be heard, may face the penalties provided in 18 U.S.C. 641 and other applicable laws. Additionally, former OGE employees are subject to the restrictions and penalties of 18 U.S.C. 207 and 216.
( b ) A current OGE employee who testifies or produces official records and information in violation of this part shall be subject to disciplinary action.
### §567b–1. Amended compact

The consent of Congress is hereby given to the States of Maryland and West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Virginia and Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia to adopt the aforementioned amendments and enter into the amended compact hereinbefore recited and every part and article thereof: Provided, That nothing contained in such amended compact shall be construed as impairing or in any manner affecting any right or jurisdiction of the United States in and over the region which forms the subject of this compact: And provided further, That the consent herein given does not extend to section (F)(2) of article II of the amended compact.

(Pub. L. 91–407, §1, Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 860.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The amended compact, referred to in text, is set out in 84 Stat. 856 to 860.
**Exhibit 10.1**

**Cymer, Inc.**

**Long-Term Incentive Program**

**Summary Description**

**Establishment:** The following is a summary of the terms of the Long-Term Incentive Program (“LTIP”) approved by the CompensationCommittee of Cymer’s Board of Directors. 

**Eligibility:**Generally, director-level employees and senior individualcontributor employees and above that are employed by Cymer or its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the LTIP, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determines in its discretion whichCymer employees shall be participants. 

**Equity Awards:**Equity awards under the LTIP are granted under and in accordance with theterms of Cymer’s Amended and Restated 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”) and may include any of the following instruments: performance-based restricted stock units, restricted stock units, stock options, or any otherequity awards permitted under the Incentive Plan. 

All equity awards granted under the LTIP are based on a target dollar amount which is setannually by position level. Participants at the same position level at the time of grant are eligible to receive similar-sized equity awards. The target dollar amount for each position level is converted into equity awards by dividing anaverage fair value of Cymer’s Common Stock over a determined number of trading days into the target dollar amount to determine the aggregate number of shares initially subject to the equity awards granted under the LTIP. The CompensationCommittee determines the amount awarded to each participant and has the authority to approve supplemental equity awards to selected participants under the LTIP. 

The number of shares subject to performance-based equity awards granted under the LTIP are subject to increase or decrease based on Cymer’s actualperformance against performance measures approved by the Compensation Committee. Cymer’s actual performance against performance measures for the applicable performance period is approved and certified in writing by the Compensation Committee.

The shares subject to equity awards granted under the LTIP, including the shares that become issuable upon achievement of performancemeasures, may be subject to time-based vesting that require a participant to remain employed by Cymer for a period of time to receive the shares. 

The Compensation Committee has the authority to alter any portion of a performance-based equity award under the LTIP; provided, however, that forperformance-based equity awards that are intended to comply with the requirements for the performance-based compensation exemption to the Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) deduction limits, the Compensation Committee only has the authorityto reduce, and not to increase, such awards. 

Participants will receive a prospectus describing the terms of the equity awards according tothe Incentive Plan. 

**Disclaimer:** Cymer reserves the right to modify the LTIP at any time. Cymer also retains the right to awardadditional incentive compensation outside the LTIP.
The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was

referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

___________

No. 95-1042

___________

Denver Lemons, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

A. L. Lockhart, Director, *

Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Correction, *

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: February 29, 1996

 Filed: March 4, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Denver Lemons appeals the district court's1

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Having carefully reviewed the

record and Lemons's brief, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears

and that an opinion would lack precedential value. 

 Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §3407. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Characterization

The terms "characterization", "characterize", and "characterizing" mean activities that provide comprehensive data and interpretations for a specific area of interest of the sea floor, sub-bottom, water column, or hydrologic features, such as water masses and currents, in direct support of specific research, environmental protection, resource management, policymaking, or applied mission objectives.

#### (2) Exploration

The term 1 "exploration", "explore", and "exploring" means 1 activities that provide—

(A) a multidisciplinary view of an unknown or poorly understood area of the sea floor, sub-bottom, or water column; and

(B) an initial assessment of the physical, chemical, geological, biological, archaeological, or other characteristics of such an area.

#### (3) Mapping

The terms "map" and "mapping" mean activities that provide comprehensive data and information needed to understand sea floor characteristics, including depth, topography, bottom type, sediment composition and distribution, underlying geologic structure, and benthic flora and fauna.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12007, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIII, §10305(h), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3974.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "terms" and "mean".
Exhibit
23.4





Consent
of Webb & Company, P. A., Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by references in the Registration Statement on Form
S-1 of Waytronx, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to the
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 (consolidated) and
2007 of Waytronx, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (consolidated) and 2007 and to the reference to our firm
under the heading “Experts” in the prospectus.





WEBB
& COMPANY, P.A.


Certified
Public Accountants





Boynton
Beach, Florida


March 27,
2009
#### § 362.111 Severability.

Any provision of this part held to be invalid or unenforceable as applied to any person or circumstance shall be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect to the provision permitted by law, including as applied to persons not similarly situated or to dissimilar circumstances, unless such holding is that the provision is invalid and unenforceable in all circumstances, in which event the provision shall be severable from the remainder of this part and shall not affect the remainder thereof.

[89 FR 25771, Apr. 12, 2024]
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection withthe annual report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China with limited liability (the “Company”), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, YANG Deyu, General Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2106. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–83, title I, §3(a)(3), Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1010

Section, based on S. Res. No. 95, Ninety-second Congress, Apr. 1, 1971, enacted into permanent law and amended by Pub. L. 100–696, title IX, §901(a), (c), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4610, 4611, related to additional authority of the Senate Commission on Art to acquire works of art, historical objects, documents, or exhibits.

Section was classified to section 188b–5 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
§ 2634.802 Requirements. ( a ) *Ethics agreement defined.* The term *ethics agreement* will include, for the purposes of this subpart, any oral or written promise by a reporting individual to undertake specific actions in order to alleviate an actual or apparent conflict of interest, such as: ( 1 ) Recusal;
( 2 ) Divestiture of a financial interest;
( 3 ) Resignation from a position with a non-Federal business or other entity;
( 4 ) Procurement of a waiver pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 208(b)(1) or (b)(3); or
( 5 ) Establishment of a qualified blind or diversified trust under the Act and subpart D of this part.
( b ) *Time limit.* The ethics agreement will specify that the individual must complete the action which he or she has agreed to undertake within a period not to exceed three months from the date of the agreement (or of Senate confirmation, if applicable). Exceptions to the three-month deadline can be made in cases of unusual hardship, as determined by the Office of Government Ethics, for those ethics agreements which are submitted to it (see § 2634.803), or by the designated agency ethics official for all other ethics agreements.
Example: An official of the ABC Aircraft Company is nominated to a Department of Defense position requiring the advice and consent of the Senate. As a condition of assuming the position, the individual has agreed to divest himself of his ABC Aircraft stock which he recently acquired while he was an officer with the company. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission prohibits officers of public corporations from deriving a profit from the sale of stock in the corporation in which they hold office within six months of acquiring the stock, and directs that any such profit must be returned to the issuing corporation or its stock holders. Since meeting the usual three-month time limit specified in this subpart for satisfying an ethics agreement might entail losing any profit that could be realized on the sale of this stock, the nominee requests that the limit be extended beyond the six-month period imposed by the Commission. Written approval must be obtained from the Office of Government Ethics to extend the three-month period.
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Jan 12, 2007 19:44

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

LTR-07-0023

EDO

Sonny Perdue

GA-GOV

Dale Klein

LOGGING DATE: 01/12/2007

C&J%:DEDMRS EDO

DEDR

DEDLA

SUBJECT: Licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials now

defineds as byproduct material

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

Appropriate

RF

01/05/2007

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

No

Made publicly available in ADAMS via EDO/DPC

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DDATE SIGNED:
STATE OF GEORGIA

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

ATLANTA 30334-0900

Sonny Perdue

GOVERNOR January 5, 2007

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Chairman Klein:

Trhe purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 65 1(e) of the Energy

Policy Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator produced

radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections 1 le(3) and 1 le(4) of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

In 1969, the State of Georgia entered into an Agreement with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (Commission) under Section 274b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Under that Agreement, the State of Georgia licenses byproduct material as defined in Section II e(l )

of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, Georgia licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator

produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from the

program for licensing 11 e(1) byproduct material; no changes have been made to the licensing

program that would impact the previous performance evaluation program finding of adequacy.

Further, we intend to continue to license the new byproduct material under this same program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the State of Georgia has a program for

licensing byproduct material, as defined in Section lIe of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, that is adequate to protect the public health and safety, and that the State intends to

continue to implement our regulatory responsibility with respect to the byproduct material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the

Transition of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct

Material."'.

Sincerely,

S-onnyPerdue

SP:epdtvj
§ 330.610 CTAP eligibility period. ( a ) CTAP eligibility begins on the date the employee meets the definition of *surplus* or *displaced* in § 330.602.
( b ) CTAP eligibility ends on the date the employee: ( 1 ) Separates from the agency either voluntarily or involuntarily;
( 2 ) Receives a notice rescinding, canceling, or modifying the notice which established CTAP eligibility so that the employee no longer meets the definition of *surplus* or *displaced;*
( 3 ) Is placed in another position within the agency at any grade or pay level, either permanent or time-limited, before the agency separates the employee; or
( 4 ) Is appointed to a career, career-conditional, or excepted appointment without time limit in any agency at any grade or pay level.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Sheamus Toal, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of New York & Company, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: September 10, 2009

/s/ SHEAMUS TOAL Sheamus Toal Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
§ 532.203 Structure of regular wage schedules. ( a ) Each nonsupervisory and leader regular wage schedule shall have 15 grades, which shall be designated as follows: ( 1 ) *WG* means an appropriated fund nonsupervisory grade;
( 2 ) *WL* means an appropriated fund leader grade;
( 3 ) *NA* means a nonappropriated fund nonsupervisory grade; and
( 4 ) *NL* means a nonappropriated fund leader grade.
( b ) Each supervisory regular wage schedule shall have 19 grades, which shall be designated as follows: ( 1 ) *WS* means an appropriated fund supervisory grade; and
( 2 ) *NS* means a nonappropriated fund supervisory grade.
( c ) The step 2 or payline rate for each grade of a leader regular wage schedule shall be equal to 110 percent of the rate for step 2 of the corresponding grade of the nonsupervisory regular wage schedule for the area.
( d ) The step 2 or payline rate for each grade of an appropriated fund supervisory regular wage schedule shall be: ( 1 ) For grades WS-1 through WS-10, equal to the rate for step 2 of the corresponding grade of the nonsupervisory regular wage schedule for the area, plus 30 percent of the rate for step 2 of WG-10;
( 2 ) For grades WS-11 through WS-18, the second rate of WS-10, plus 5, 11.5, 19.6, 29.2, 40.3, 52.9, 67.1, and 82.8 percent, respectively, of the difference between the step 2 rates of WS-10 and WS-19; and
( 3 ) For grade WS-19, the third rate in effect for General Schedule grade GS-14 at the time of the area wage schedule adjustment. The WS-19 rate shall include any cost of living allowance payable for the area under 5 U.S.C. 5941.
( e ) The step 2 or payline rate for each grade of a nonappropriated fund supervisory regular wage schedule shall be: ( 1 ) For grades NS-1 through NS-8, equal to the rate for step 2 of the corresponding grade of the nonsupervisory regular wage schedule for the area, plus 20 percent of the rate for step 2 of NA-8;
( 2 ) For grades NS-9 through NS-15, equal to 120 percent of the rate for step 2 of the corresponding grade of the nonsupervisory regular wage schedule for the area;
( 3 ) For grades NS-16 through NS-19, the rates will be 25, 30, 35 and 40 percent, respectively, above the step 2 rate of NA-15;
( f ) The number of within-grade steps and the differentials between steps for each nonsupervisory grade on a regular wage schedule shall be established in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 5343(e)(1). Each grade on a leader and supervisory regular wage schedule shall have 5 within-grade steps with step 2 set according to paragraphs (c), (d), or (e) of this section, as appropriate, and— ( 1 ) Step 1 set at 96 percent of the step 2 rate;
( 2 ) Step 3 set at 104 percent of the step 2 rate;
( 3 ) Step 4 set at 108 percent of the step 2 rate; and
( 4 ) Step 5 set at 112 percent of the step 2 rate.
[46 FR 21344, Apr. 10, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 13385, Mar. 30, 1983; 49 FR 28347, July 11, 1984; 55 FR 46140, Nov. 1, 1990]