alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-145 October 31, 2005

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS NOVEMBER 7 AND 9 TO DISCUSS

PROPOSED CHANGES TO WORKER FATIGUE, DRUG-TESTING RULES

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with interested stakeholders on Nov. 7 in

Morris, Ill., and Nov. 9 in Charlotte, N.C., to discuss proposed improvements to the agency’s fitnessfor-duty requirements for workers who have unescorted access to a nuclear power plant’s protected

areas.

The Illinois meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn, 200 Gore Road, Morris, and the North

Carolina meeting will be held at the Hampton Inn and Suites, 9110 Southern Pines Blvd., Charlotte. 

Both meetings will have two sessions, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. and from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. 

The meetings will include separate discussions of the proposed changes to drug and alcoholtesting provisions and to proposed fatigue-management provisions. The public will have several

opportunities to ask questions throughout the meetings. The meeting agenda is available on the

agency’s web site at this address: 

http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/idmws/ViewDocByAccession.asp?AccessionNumber=ML052990048. 

For more information on the meeting, contact David Diec at 301-415-2834 or via email at

dtd@nrc.gov.

###
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No.  07-050                                                                                                                    April 18, 2007

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, MAY 3-5

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)will hold a public meeting May 3-5, in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, digitalinstrumentation and control systems matters. In addition, the committee will be briefed on rulemakingto make risk-informed changes to loss-of-coolant accident technical requirements, and the status ofNRC’s development of a long-term research plan.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants andrelated safety issues. 

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at11545 Rockville Pike. The sessions on Thursday and Friday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.;Saturday’s session will run from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.  A complete agenda is available on the NRC’sWeb site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2007 .

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting shouldcontact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. To pursue video conferencing services, contact TheronBrown, at 301-415-8066.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Benton, Elder and Overton Argued at Richmond, Virginia

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0271-97-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JUNE 24, 1997 CHAD EVERETT SPENCER

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Wilford Taylor, Jr., Judge Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellant. J. Ashton Wray, Jr., for appellee.

The Commonwealth appeals from a pretrial order in the Circuit Court of the City of Hampton in which the trial judge granted a motion to suppress the evidence. For the reasons stated, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. The parties are fully conversant with the record in the cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. In an appeal by the Commonwealth, "we view the evidence in the light most favorable to [the defendant], the prevailing party below, and we grant all reasonable inferences fairly deducible

from that evidence." Commonwealth v. Grimstead , 12 Va. App. 1066, 1067, 407 S.E.2d 47, 48 (1991). According to the

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2 - defendant’s version of the encounter, the police officer asked for the driver’s identification and registration and returned to his cruiser. Only after he had come back to the car after checking the driver’s identification did he ask to see the appellant’s identification. In certain cases, an officer during a traffic stop may make additional intrusions upon passengers’ personal liberties "pending completion of the stop." Maryland v. Wilson , 117 S. Ct. 882, 886 (1997). In this case, however, the traffic stop was completed. The officer had investigated the traffic violation, checked the driver’s identification and registration, and returned the driver’s documents. Until that point, "[a]s a practical matter, the passengers are already stopped by virtue of the stop of the vehicle." Id. After that point, the stop is completed and an independent reason is needed to continue detaining the passengers. The trial judge specifically found no valid reason and upon reviewing the record, we agree. Accordingly, the ruling below is affirmed.

Affirmed.
### §426a. Additional investigations concerning erosion of shores of coastal and lake waters; payment of costs; "shores" defined

In addition to participating in cooperative investigations and studies with agencies of the various States as authorized in section 426 of this title, it shall be the duty of the Chief of Engineers, through the Coastal Engineering Research Center, to make general investigations with a view to preventing erosion of the shores of the United States by waves and currents and determining the most suitable methods for the protection, restoration, and development of beaches; and to publish from time to time such useful data and information concerning the erosion and protection of beaches and shore lines as the Center may deem to be of value to the people of the United States. The cost of the general investigations authorized by sections 426a to 426d of this title shall be borne wholly by the United States. As used in said sections, the word "shores" includes the shore lines of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the Gulf of Mexico, the Great Lakes, Lake Champlain, and estuaries and bays directly connected therewith.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 334, §1, 59 Stat. 508; Pub. L. 88–172, §1, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 304.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Coastal Engineering Research Center has been substituted for Beach Erosion Board pursuant to Pub. L. 88–172, §1, providing in part for the abolition of the Beach Erosion Board, which is set out as a note under section 426 of this title. For transfer of investigatory functions of the Beach Erosion Board to the Coastal Engineering Research Center, see section 426–1 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Kitchen Cabinet 
Manufacturers Association (``KCMA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of 
the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of 
its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for 
the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Kitchen 
Cabinet Manufacturers Association, Reston, VA. The nature and scope of 
KCMA's standards development activities are: The development of 
performance and construction standards for kitchen and vanity cabinets 
and performance standards for fabricated high pressure decorative 
laminate countertops.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24577 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 06-149                                                                                                            December 8, 2006

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONFOR SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-yearrenewal of the operating license for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, is available forpublic review.

The Shearon Harris plant is a pressurized water reactor located approximately 20 milessouthwest of Raleigh, N.C. The current operating license expires Oct. 24, 2026. The applicant,Carolina Power and Light (a subsidiary of Progress Energy), submitted the renewal application Nov.16. The application is available on the NRC Web site at this address:http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html . 

The NRC staff is currently conducting its initial reviews of the application to determinewhether it contains enough information for the required formal reviews. If the application hassufficient information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file it and will announce an opportunity forthe public to request an adjudicatory hearing on the renewal request.

Additional information about the NRC’s review of reactor license renewal applications isavailable on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Hugh H. Eby, Appellant, and Eby Specialty Corporation, Respondent.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1027.]
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         SECTION 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifton
E. Lind, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

  /s/ Clifton E. Lind
---------------------------

Clifton E. Lind
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2015202EN.01003601.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/36

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 185/2014

of 25 September 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1253]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2014/18/EU of 29 January 2014 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2014/18/EU of 29 January 2014 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 3q (Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 L 0018: Commission Directive 2014/18/EU of 29 January 2014 (OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 20).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 L 0018: Commission Directive 2014/18/EU of 29 January 2014 (OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 20).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/18/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 40, 11.2.2014, p. 20.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.607 Noncompetitive appointment of present and former Peace Corps personnel. ( a ) An agency in the executive branch may appoint noncompetitively, for other than temporary appointment, an individual: ( 1 ) Who has completed no less than 36 months of continuous service without a break in service of 3 days or more under section 7(a) of the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 2506) which pertains to the appointment of Peace Corps staff (not volunteers);
( 2 ) Whom the Director of the Peace Corps certifies as having satisfactorily served under such an appointment; and
( 3 ) Who meets OPM qualification standards—including any written test requirements—for the position in question.
( 4 ) Who is not a Peace Corps volunteer as this paragraph does not apply to Peace Corps volunteers.
( b ) *Time limitations.* ( 1 ) An individual's eligibility under this section extends through September 30, 1982, or until 3 years after separation from qualifying service with the Peace Corps, whichever is later.
( 2 ) An agency may not extend this period.
( c ) *Conditions.* Any law, Executive order, or regulation which disqualifies an applicant for appointment in the competitive service also disqualifies an applicant for appointment under this section.
( d ) *Acquisition of competitive status.* A person appointed under paragraph (a) of this section acquires competitive status automatically upon completion of probation.
( e ) *Tenure on appointment.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, a person appointed under paragraph (a) of this section becomes a career-conditional employee.
( 2 ) A person appointed under paragraph (a) of this section becomes a career employee if excepted from the service requirement for career tenure by § 315.201(c).
[45 FR 43365, June 27, 1980, as amended at 46 FR 35079, July 7, 1981; 54 FR 37092, Sept. 7, 1989]
#### § 4001.107 Involvement in System institution board member elections.

No covered employee who is able to participate in a System institution board election because of System securities owned by virtue of retaining a pre-existing loan or extension of credit from a System institution in accordance with § 4001.104(b) shall take any part, directly or indirectly, in the nomination or election of a board member of a System institution, other than by exercising the right to vote. In addition, a covered employee shall not make any oral or written statement that may be reasonably construed as intending to influence any vote in such nominations or elections.
§ 297.104 Types of records. The Office manages three generic types of personnel records systems: ( a ) Internal systems of records are under the Office's physical control and are established and maintained by the Office solely on its own employees and, when appropriate, on others in contact with the Office regarding matters within its authority.
( b ) Centralized systems of personnel records are physically established and maintained by the Office with regard to most current and former Federal employees and some applicants for Federal employment.
( c ) Governmentwide systems of personnel records are maintained by the Office, and through Office delegations of authority, by Federal agencies with regard to their own employees or applicants for employment. Although they are Office records, they are in the physical custody of those agencies. Though in the physical custody of agencies, the Office retains authority under its record management authority and under the Privacy Act to decide appeals of initial agency determinations regarding access to and amendment of material in these systems.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY THOMAS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 319 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
§ 3801.106 Outside employment. ( a ) *Definition.* For purposes of this section, *outside employment* means any form of employment, business relationship or activity, involving the provision of personal services whether or not for compensation, other than in the discharge of official duties. It includes, but is not limited to, services as a lawyer, officer, director, trustee, employee, agent, consultant, contractor, or general partner. Speaking, writing and serving as a fact witness are excluded from this definition, so long as they are not combined with the provision of other services that do fall within this definition, such as the practice of law. Employees who wish to engage in compensated speaking and writing should review § 2635.807 of this title.
( b ) *Prohibited outside employment.* ( 1 ) No employee may engage in outside employment that involves: ( i ) The practice of law, unless it is uncompensated and in the nature of community service, or unless it is on behalf of himself, his parents, spouse, or children;
( ii ) Any criminal or habeas corpus matter, be it Federal, State, or local; or
( iii ) Litigation, investigations, grants or other matters in which the Department of Justice is or represents a party, witness, litigant, investigator or grant-maker.
( 2 ) Where application of the restrictions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section will cause undue personal or family hardship; unduly prohibit an employee from completing a professional obligation entered into prior to Government service; or unduly restrict the Department from securing necessary and uniquely specialized services, the restrictions may be waived in writing based upon a determination that the activities covered by the waiver are not expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation. Employees should refer to DOJ Order 1735.1 on obtaining waivers. The Order is available from the agency designee which, for purposes of this rule, shall be the Deputy Designated Agency Ethics Official for the component.
( c ) *Prior approval for outside employment.* ( 1 ) An employee must obtain written approval before engaging in outside employment, not otherwise prohibited by paragraph (b) of this section that involves: ( i ) The practice of law; or
( ii ) A subject matter, policy,or program that is in his component's area of responsibility.
( 2 ) Employees should refer to DOJ Order 1735.1 for procedures on obtaining prior approval. A waiver granted pursuant to paragraph (b)(2) of this section will be sufficient to satisfy this prior approval requirement.
( 3 ) Approval shall be granted only upon a determination that the outside employment is not expected to involve conduct that is prohibited by statute or Federal regulation.
[62 FR 23942, May 2, 1997; 62 FR 31865, June 11, 1997]
### §431. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 431 was editorially reclassified as section 30101 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-015 June 30, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

GRANT LARKIN NAMED SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR 

AT WATERFORD 3 NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Arlington, Texas, have selected Grant Larkin

as the new Senior Resident Inspector at the Waterford 3 nuclear plant.

Entergy Nuclear operates the plant near New Orleans, La. The NRC has two inspectors

assigned to the plant. He replaces Michael Hay, who has transferred to the NRC’s Region IV

office in Arlington, Texas, as a Senior Project Engineer. 

“Grant Larkin’s experience and commitment to safety will help the NRC ensure that

Waterford 3 conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect the public health and

safety,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett.

Following U.S. Army service in Germany as a translator/interpreter, Mr. Larkin graduated

from the University of Minnesota with bachelor's degrees in political science and geology in

1982. While working for the Department of the Navy, he completed a bachelor's degree in

mechanical engineering in 1986 and continued his civilian career as a nuclear engineer at naval

facilities in California, New York and Washington state.

 From 1983 to 2000, Mr. Larkin refueled naval reactor plants and worked with

mechanical and fluid system engineering groups engaged in repair work. In February 2000, Mr.

Larkin joined the NRC as a reactor engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects at the Region IV

office in Arlington, Texas. In 2001, he was named Resident Inspector at Waterford 3.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. 

They serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections and

monitoring significant work projects.
Mr. Larkin, his wife, Jenni, and three children live in Destrehan, Louisiana

The Waterford 3 resident inspectors can be reached at: 985-783-6253.

###