alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 330.210 Applying RPL placement priority. ( a ) RPL placement priority applies to: ( 1 ) Permanent and time-limited positions to be filled by competitive service appointment; and
( 2 ) The grade or pay level at which the agency fills the position. If a position is available at multiple grades or pay levels, placement priority applies at the grade or pay level at which the position is ultimately filled.
( b ) An agency must not effect a permanent or time-limited competitive service appointment of another individual if there is an RPL placement priority candidate registered for the vacancy, unless the action is listed as an exception in § 330.211.
( c ) An agency must document that there are no RPL placement priority candidates for the vacancy when requesting a competitive certificate of eligibles under part 332 of this chapter. Similarly, an agency must offer the vacancy to any RPL placement priority candidate(s) before effecting an appointment under a noncompetitive appointing authority, such as under part 315 of this chapter.
( d ) Once an agency has ensured there are no RPL placement priority candidates for a particular vacancy and documents in writing an employment offer that is accepted by another individual, the agency may fulfill that employment offer to that individual.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE
§ 2635.205 Limitations on use of exceptions. Notwithstanding any exception provided in this subpart, other than § 2635.204(j), an employee may not: ( a ) Accept a gift in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act;
( b ) Use, or permit the use of, the employee's Government position, or any authority associated with public office, to solicit or coerce the offering of a gift;
( c ) Accept gifts from the same or different sources on a basis so frequent that a reasonable person would be led to believe the employee is using the employee's public office for private gain; *Example 1 to paragraph (c):* A purchasing agent for a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center routinely deals with representatives of pharmaceutical manufacturers who provide information about new company products. Because of a crowded calendar, the purchasing agent has offered to meet with manufacturer representatives during lunch hours Tuesdays through Thursdays, and the representatives routinely arrive at the employee's office bringing a sandwich and a soft drink for the employee. Even though the market value of each of the lunches is less than $6 and the aggregate value from any one manufacturer does not exceed the $50 aggregate limitation in § 2635.204(a) on gifts of $20 or less, the practice of accepting even these modest gifts on a recurring basis is improper.
( d ) Accept a gift in violation of any statute; relevant statutes applicable to all employees include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) 18 U.S.C. 201(b), which prohibits public officials from, directly or indirectly, corruptly demanding, seeking, receiving, accepting, or agreeing to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act; being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or for being induced to do or omit to do any action in violation of their official duties. As used in 18 U.S.C. 201(b), the term “public official” is broadly construed and includes regular and special Government employees as well as all other Government officials; and
( 2 ) 18 U.S.C. 209, which prohibits employees, other than special Government employees, from receiving any salary or any contribution to or supplementation of salary from any source other than the United States as compensation for services as a Government employee. The statute contains several specific exceptions to this general prohibition, including an exception for contributions made from the treasury of a State, county, or municipality;
( e ) Accept a gift in violation of any Executive order; or
( f ) Accept any gift when acceptance of the gift is specifically prohibited by a supplemental agency regulation issued with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics, pursuant to § 2635.105.
#### § 1840.1 Service of subpoenas by mail.

In addition to all other methods of authorized service, an Office of Special Counsel subpoena may be served by mailing a copy to the person at his or her residence or place of business by certified or registered mail.

[54 FR 47345, Nov. 14, 1989]
§ 317.602 Conditions of a limited appointment. ( a ) Appointments authorized under this provision may be deemed provisional appointments for purposes of the regulations set out in parts 831, 842, 870, and 890 of this chapter if they meet the criteria set out in §§ 316.401 and 316.403 of this chapter.
( b ) A limited appointment is not renewable. If an agency initially made the appointment for less than the maximum period authorized by the Office of Personnel Management, however, the agency may extend the appointment to the maximum period without the approval of the Office. The Office must be notified of the extension.
( c ) A limited term or limited emergency appointee may not be appointed to, or continue to hold, a position under such an appointment if, within the preceding 48 months, the individual has served more than 36 months, in the aggregate, under any combination of limited term and limited emergency appointments.
[45 FR 62414, Sept. 19, 1980, as amended at 56 FR 10142, Mar. 11, 1991; 60 FR 6386, Feb. 2, 1995]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY OF 2002

In connection with the interim quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d)
of the securities exchange act of 1934 of Mayfair Mining & Minerals, Inc. on
Form 10QSB dated for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Registration Statement fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) pr 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Registration Statement fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

August 23, 2005

By: /s/ Clive de Larrabeiti
| **Exhibit 32.1** |
|------------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

| In    connection with the Quarterly Report of China Media Group Corporation a Texas corporation    (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine months period ending September 30,    2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Cheng Pheng LOI, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to    the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906    of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Media Group Corporation, and will be retained by China Media Group Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
    /s/ Cheng Pheng LOI
--------------------------
Cheng    Pheng LOI
Chief    Executive Officer
November    21, 2011 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L UI S AR T UR O P AR R A C AMAC HO , a. k. a. L ui s C am ac ho P arra , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74249 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 660- 807 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , a n dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . L ui s A rtur o P a rr aC a m a c ho, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s or de rpr e t e rm i tt i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orc a nc e l l a t i on of r e m ova l . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74249 2 q u e s tio n s o f

law , Mercado -Zazueta v. H older , 58 0 F . 3d 11 02 , 11 04 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) , a n dw e g r a n t th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B I A de c i de d thi s c a s e w i thoutthe be ne f i tof ourde c i s i on i n Me r c adoZa z u e ta v. H

older , i n w hi ch w e hel d thatfor purpo se s of s at i sf yi ng the fi ve ye ar s o f law fu l p erm an en t res id en ce re q u ired u n d er8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 b (a )( 1 ), a p ar en t’ s s t a tus a s al a w f

ul pe rm a ne ntr e s i de nti s i m put e d t o the une m a nc i pa t e d m i nor c hi l dr e n r e s i di ng w i th tha tpa r e nt . 580 F . 3d a t1113. A c c or di ngl y , w e gr a ntthe p e titio n f o rr e v ie w a n dr e m a n dto th e B I A f o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s . See I N S v. V en tu ra , 5 3 7 U .S . 1 2 , 1 6 ( 2 0 0 2 ) ( p e rc u r ia m ) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W G R A N T E D ; R E M A N D E D .
[No. 6992.

Decided January 17, 1908.]

#### Thomas McCart, *Appellant,*v. Racine Woolen Mills, Blake & Company, *Respondent.**1*

Appeal — Record — Bill of Exceptions — Affidavits. Affidavits used upon a hearing to quash a service of summons must he brought up on appeal by hill of exceptions or statement of facts, or appeal from the order will be dismissed.

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Poindexter, J., entered December 22, 1906, quashing a service of summons.

Appeal dismissed.

*S. P. Domer,*for appellant.

*Henley*& *Kellam,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 93 Pac. 517.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order quashing the service of summons. The notice to quash was heard on affidavits which accompanied the motion, affidavits in answer thereto, and affidavits, in reply to the answering affidavits. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be granted. This court has repeatedly held that it cannot review a question of fact based upon affidavits unless the affidavits are brought before the court by the method provided by law for bringing evidence into this court. This was not done in this case. The appellant caused the affidavits to be certified by the clerk as part of the transcript, and procured a certificate of the judge certifying that the affidavits *315were “presented to the court, and examined, and passed upon by the court at the hearing of said motion,” but this does not comply with the statute. The statute requires that evidence be brought into this court by a bill of exceptions or a statement of facts. *Jacobsen v. Lunn,*16 Wash. 487, 48 Pac. 237; *State v. Anderson,*20 Wash. 193, *55*Pac. 39; *Chevalier*& *Co. v. Wilson,*30 Wash. 227, 70 Pac. 487; *Anderson v. McGregor,*36 Wash. 124, 78 Pac. 776; *Soder v. Adams Hardware Co.,*38 Wash. 607, 80 Pac. 775; *Taylor v. Modern Woodmen of America,*42 Wash. 304, 84 Pac. 867.

The appeal is dismissed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 159

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 159 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93023, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 159.8 Allowance for loss, injury, etc.

Allowance in duties for any merchandise which is lost, stolen, destroyed, injured, abandoned, or short-shipped will be made in accordance with the provisions of part 158 of this chapter.

[T.D. 73-175, 38 FR 17482, July 2, 1973, as amended by CBP Dec. 11-02, 76 FR 2576, Jan. 14, 2011]
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.703 Employees formerly reached on a register. ( a ) *Employee coverage.* An employee who was serving in a position when his or her name was within reach for career or career-conditional appointment on a register appropriate for that position may be converted to career or career-conditional employment when: ( 1 ) The employee's name was included on an appropriate certificate issued while the employee was serving in the position, or reconstruction of the appropriate register verifies that the employee would have been within reach;
( 2 ) The register was being used for career and career-conditional appointments when he or she was reached;
( 3 ) He or she has been continuously employed since being reached;
( 4 ) Conversion is initiated either before the expiration of the register or during a period of continuous service since the employee was reached; and
( 5 ) When the employee is a nonpreference eligible who was first reached after February 1, 1955, the Office, or the agency, in accordance with an agreement with the Office, determines that satisfactory reasons existed for passing over any preference eligible who preceded the employee on the register when he or she was reached and who is still within reach and available for appointment.
( b ) *Tenure on conversion.* An employee whose appointment is converted under paragraph (a) of this section becomes: ( 1 ) A career-conditional employee except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
( 2 ) A career employee when he or she has completed the service requirement for career tenure or is excepted from it by § 315.201(c).
( c ) *Acquisition of competitive status.* An employee whose employment is converted to career or career-conditional employment under this section acquires a competitive status automatically on completion of probation.
[44 FR 55132, Sept. 25, 1979]
# L_2014321EN.01000102.xml

| 7.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 321/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 321/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the European Union

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on facilitating the issue of short-stay visas to citizens of the Republic of Cape Verde and of the European Union will enter into force on 1 December 2014, the procedure provided for in Article 12(1) of the Agreement having been completed on 15 October 2014.

---
---

Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Oromin Explorations Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 28, 2009



(signed):    Chet Idziszek



Chet Idziszek

President and Chief Executive Officer





---
§ 4601.105 Additional rules for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employees. The following rules apply to employees of FEMA, except Special Government Employees, and are in addition to §§ 4601.101 through 4601.103 and 4601.107 and 4601.108 of this part: ( a ) *Prohibited outside employment (intermittent employees).* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no intermittent FEMA employees hired under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 5149, which includes all Disaster Assistance Employees or Stafford Act Employees and Cadre of On-Call Response Employees, shall be employed by a current FEMA contractor while a FEMA employee, whether or not they are on activated status.
( b ) *Prohibited outside employment (non-intermittent employees).* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no non-intermittent FEMA employee shall be employed by a current FEMA contractor.
( c ) *Waivers.* The FEMA Chief Deputy Ethics Official or his or her agency designee may grant a written waiver of any prohibition in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section with the DAEO's concurrence. To grant the waiver, the FEMA Chief Deputy Ethics Official or his or her agency designee must determine that the waiver is consistent with 5 CFR part 2635 and not otherwise prohibited by law; that the prohibition is not necessary to avoid the appearance of misuse of position or loss of impartiality; and that the waiver will not undermine the public's confidence in the employee's impartiality and objectivity in administering FEMA programs. A waiver under this paragraph may impose appropriate conditions, such as requiring execution of a written disqualification statement.
#### William R. Campbell et al, Appellants, v. Nassau County et al., Respondents.

In an action to declare void certain resolutions and an ordinance made and passed by defendants, and to enjoin further steps thereunder, order granting defendants’ motion, under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment on the pleadings, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Appeal *786from order denying plaintiffs’ cross motion for examination of defendants before trial dismissed, without costs. Judgment on the pleadings was properly granted to defendants because section 1229 of the Nassau County Government Law (L. 1945, ch. 897) provides that the determination made by the ordinance ([sic] “order”) may be reviewed- by a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, commenced within thirty days from the date of the adoption of the ordinance, and that the determination made by such ordinance shall be “final and conclusive” unless application is made for such review within such period of thirty days. The complaint alleges that the ordinance was adopted October 1, 1945. The complaint was verified June 18, 1947. This action in equity cannot be maintained, not only because the County Government Law provides that the method of review is by a proceeding under article 78, but because the determination made by the ordinance has become “final and conclusive”. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Sneed, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs, with the following memorandum: If section 1229 of the Nassau County Government Law (L. 1945, ch. 897, § 5) is properly read by substituting the word “ ordinance ” for the word “ order ” then this action in equity cannot be maintained. However, I am further of the opinion that it has been correctly held that the complaint and the annexed exhibits fail to state facts sufficient to apprise defendants of the respects in which it is claimed that the “ plan, estimate and report ” is incomplete or false or how such matters were concealed. It is claimed that the plan, estimate and report was incomplete in that it may not include the cost of the real estate to be acquired for the sewage disposal district and that it is false in that the estimates of costs made in 1945 were based upon 1940 prices. There are no facts alleged upon which to base these claims. The case of *Staten Island Edison Corp.*v. *Maltbie*(296 N. Y. 374) is inapplicable.
§ 2635.1005 Administration. ( a ) *Trustee's duties and powers.* A trustee of a legal expense fund is responsible for: ( 1 ) Operating the legal expense fund trust consistent with this part and applicable state law;
( 2 ) Operating as a fiduciary for the employee beneficiary in relation to the legal expense fund property and the legal expense fund purpose;
( 3 ) Providing information to the employee beneficiary as necessary to comply with the Ethics in Government Act, 5 U.S.C. 13104(a)(2), part 2634 of this chapter, and this part; and
( 4 ) Notifying donors and payees whose contributions and distributions, respectively, are reportable that their names will be disclosed on the OGE website.
( b ) *Limitation on role of the employee beneficiary.* An employee beneficiary may not exercise control over the legal expense fund property.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 158 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 158

            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To make the repeal of the estate tax permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTATE TAX REPEAL MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
Reconciliation Act of 2001 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``shall not apply--'' and 
        all that follows and inserting ``(other than title V) shall not 
        apply to taxable, plan, or limitation years beginning after 
        December 31, 2010.'', and
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``, estates, gifts, and 
        transfers''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in section 901 of the Economic Growth and 
Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.
                                 <all>
```