alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 149.5 Eligibility to file an Importer Security Filing, authorized agents. ( a ) *Eligibility.* To be qualified to file Importer Security Filing information electronically, a party must establish the communication protocol required by Customs and Border Protection for properly presenting the Importer Security Filing through the approved data interchange system. If the Importer Security Filing and entry or entry summary are provided via a single electronic transmission to CBP pursuant to § 149.6(b) of this part, the party making the transmission must be an importer acting on its own behalf or a licensed customs broker.
( b ) *Bond required.* The ISF Importer must possess a basic importation and entry bond containing all the necessary provisions of § 113.62 of this chapter, a basic custodial bond containing all the necessary provisions of § 113.63 of this chapter, an international carrier bond containing all the necessary provisions of § 113.64 of this chapter, a foreign trade zone operator bond containing all the necessary provisions of § 113.73 of this chapter, or an importer security filing bond as provided in Appendix D to part 113 of this chapter. If an ISF Importer does not have a required bond, the agent submitting the Importer Security Filing on behalf of the ISF Importer may post the agent's bond.
( c ) *Powers of attorney.* Authorized agents must retain powers of attorney in English until revoked. Revoked powers of attorney and letters of revocation must be retained for five years after the date of revocation. Authorized agents must make powers of attorney and letters of revocation available to representatives of Customs and Border Protection upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 356.27 Final decision. ( a ) *APO Sanctions Board.* Upon request of a party, the initial decision will be reviewed by the members of the APO Sanctions Board. The Board consists of the Under Secretary for International Trade, who shall serve as Chairperson, the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, and the General Counsel.
( b ) *Comments on initial decision.* Within 30 days after issuance of the initial decision, a party may submit written comments to the APO Sanctions Board on the initial decision, which the Board will consider when reviewing the initial decision. The parties have no right to an oral presentation, although the Board may allow oral argument in its discretion.
( c ) *Final decision by the APO Sanctions Board.* Within 60 days but not sooner than 30 days after issuance of an initial decision, the APO Sanctions Board may issue a final decision which adopts the initial decision in its entirety; differs in whole or in part from the initial decision, including the imposition of lesser included sanctions; or remands the matter to the administrative law judge or the Deputy Under Secretary for further consideration. The only sanctions that the Board can impose are those sanctions proposed in the charging letter or lesser included sanctions.
( d )
( d ) *Contents of final decision.* If the final decision of the APO Sanctions Board does not remand the matter and differs from the initial decision, it will state findings and conclusions which differ from the initial decision, if any, the basis for those findings and conclusions, and the sanctions which are to be imposed, to the extent they differ from the sanctions in the initial decision.
( e ) *Public notice of sanctions.* If the final decision is that there has been a violation of a protective order or a disclosure undertaking and that sanctions are to be imposed, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal Register and forwarded to the United States section of the Secretariat. Such publication will be no sooner than 30 days after issuance of a final decision or after a motion to reconsider has been denied, if such a motion was filed. If the final decision is made in a proceeding based upon a request to charge by an authorized agency of an FTA country, the decision will be forwarded to the Secretariat of the involved FTA country for transmittal to the authorized agency of the FTA country for publication in the official publication or other appropriate action. The Deputy Under Secretary will also provide such information to the ethics panel or other disciplinary body of the appropriate bar associations or other professional associations whenever the Deputy Under Secretary subjects a charged or affected party to a sanction under § 356.12(a)(2) and to any Federal agency likely to have an interest in the matter and will cooperate in any disciplinary actions by any association or agency.
[59 FR 229, Jan. 3, 1994, as amended at 86 FR 70051, Dec. 9, 2021]
### §12122. Efficiency in law enforcement and corrections

#### (a) In general

In the administration of each grant program funded by appropriations authorized by this Act or by an amendment made by this Act, the Attorney General shall encourage—

(1) innovative methods for the low-cost construction of facilities to be constructed, converted, or expanded and the low-cost operation of such facilities and the reduction of administrative costs and overhead expenses; and

(2) the use of surplus Federal property.

#### (b) Assessment of construction components and designs

The Attorney General may make an assessment of the cost efficiency and utility of using modular, prefabricated, precast, and pre-engineered construction components and designs for housing nonviolent criminals.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title II, §20407, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1826.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 103–322, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1796, known as the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1994 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13722 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
#### Elizabeth Ruggle, Respondent, v. Carol Cab Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     011666-005.                

*Agreement Name:*                     West Coast North America/Pacific Islands Vessel Sharing Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Hamburg Sud and Polynesia Line Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Conte Cicala; Clyde & Co. US LLP.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment deletes Polynesia Line and replaces it with The China Navigation Co. Pte. Ltd. The amendment also removes authority which authorizes the Parties to belong to a rate agreement in the Trade and deletes obsolete portions of the agreement. The parties have requested expedited review.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     1/3/2019.                

*Location: http://fmcinet/​Fmc.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​795.*

Dated: December 17, 2018.

Rachel Dickon,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-27613 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
| **Exhibit 32.2** |
|------------------|

| **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
    In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Media Group Corporation a Texas    corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months period ending June    30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    "Report"), Con Unerkov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the    best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
    (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the    financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to    China Media Group Corporation, and will be retained by China Media Group Corporation and    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
    /s/ Con Unerkov
--------------------------
Con    Unerkov
Chief    Financial Officer
August    17, 2010 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### SUBCHAPTER XXXII—CRIME FREE RURAL STATE GRANTS
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the quarterly Report of Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wais Asefi, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                            
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the
    Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|By:    | /s/
    Wais Asefi          | 
|------ | --------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Wais
    Asefi              | 
|Title: | Chief
    Executive Officer | 
|Date:  | June
    26, 2018           | 



This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1740 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 163
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1740

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 7, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             June 20, 2003

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1502 East Kiest Boulevard in Dallas, Texas, as the ``Dr. Caesar A.W. 
                   Clark, Sr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1502 
East Kiest Boulevard in Dallas, Texas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Dr. Caesar A.W. Clark, Sr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Caesar A.W. Clark, Sr. 
Post Office Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 163

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1740

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1502 East Kiest Boulevard in Dallas, Texas, as the ``Dr. Caesar A.W. 
                   Clark, Sr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 20, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
### subpart 2—data and research
#### §§ 2423.35-2423.39 [Reserved]
§ 210.59 Responses to the motion and the complaint. ( a ) Any party may file a response to a motion for temporary relief. Unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge, a response to a motion for temporary relief in an ordinary investigation must be filed not later than 10 days after service of the motion by the Commission. In a “more complicated” investigation, the response shall be due within 20 days after such service, unless otherwise ordered by the presiding administrative law judge.
( b ) The response must comply with the requirements of §§ 210.4 and 210.5 of this part, and shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) A statement that sets forth with particularity any objection to the motion for temporary relief;
( 2 ) A statement of specific facts concerning the factors the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit would consider in determining whether to affirm lower court decisions granting or denying preliminary injunctions;
( 3 ) A memorandum of points and authorities in support of the respondent's response to the motion;
( 4 ) Affidavits, where possible, executed by persons with knowledge of the facts specified in the response. Each response to the motion must address, to the extent possible, the complainant's assertions regarding whether a bond should be required and the appropriate amount of the bond. Responses to the motion for temporary relief also may contain counter-proposals concerning the amount of the bond or the manner in which the bond amount should be calculated.
( c ) Each response to the motion for temporary relief must also be accompanied by a response to the complaint and notice of investigation. Responses to the complaint and notice of investigation must comply with §§ 210.4 and 210.5 of this part, and any protective order issued by the administrative law judge under § 210.34 of this part.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 78 FR 23486, Apr. 19, 2013
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-013 February 2, 2006

NRC STAFF ISSUES GENERIC LETTER ON

ELECTRIC GRID RELIABILITY IMPACT ON PLANT RISK

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued a Generic Letter asking all U.S. nuclear

power plant operators for additional information on how they continue to ensure the reliability of

offsite electrical power sources and how they continue to comply with NRC regulations on maintaining

offsite power to safety-related systems.

The blackout of Aug. 14, 2003, caused nine U.S. nuclear power plants to shut down. Similar to

non-nuclear facilities, when the grid is lost or significantly degraded, the protective circuits of the

nuclear reactor and the turbine generator automatically shut down the plant to protect equipment.

Nuclear facilities are designed with backup power sources, typically emergency diesel generators, to

provide power to essential safety systems. During the blackout, diesel generators kept the nine plants in

a safe condition. 

The NRC’s review of the events surrounding the blackout raised several issues, including how

plants prearrange for backup power from local sources and how they monitor the grid in real time.

Plant operators have 60 days from the issuance of the Letter to submit written responses to questions in

several areas, including:

– Arrangements between the plants and grid system operators or reliability coordinators, to

monitor the grid’s ability to provide power to a plant’s safety systems;

– Arrangements for system operators to assist plants in considering grid conditions for

assessing risks related to performing grid-risk sensitive maintenance; and, 

– Procedures in place for identifying local power sources that could assist the plant when

normal offsite power is unavailable.

A draft letter was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 12, 2005, and

responses were incorporated into the final document. The NRC’s Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards reviewed the Generic Letter in November 2005. In January, the NRC staff also held a

public meeting with nuclear power plant licensees, grid operators, the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission and other interested stakeholders to discuss the letter.
The Generic Letter will be available electronically on the NRC’s web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/gen-comm/gen-letters/2006/index.html .

###
#### § 4.3 Prohibition against securing withdrawal from competition.

No person shall influence another person to withdraw from competition for any position in the competitive service for the purpose of either improving or injuring the prospects of any applicant for appointment.

[28 FR 10024, Sept. 14, 1963, as amended at 45 FR 4337, Jan. 22, 1980]
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of
China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, LI Weimin, General Manager of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |               |  |  |  |                       
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|Date: |  | June 29, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Li Weimin         
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Name: LI Weimin       
|      |  |               | 
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Title: General Manager

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §59e–1. Additional portion of Bayou Lafourche, Louisiana

Bayou Lafourche, in the State of Louisiana, between Canal Boulevard, city of Thibodaux, parish of Lafourche and the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge crossing the bayou, city of Thibodaux, parish of Lafourche, is hereby declared to be a nonnavigable waterway of the United States within the meaning of the General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 99–307, §5, May 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 447.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Bridge Act of 1946, referred to in text, is title V of act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, 60 Stat. 847, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§525 et seq.) of chapter 11 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 525 of this title and Tables.
### §426i–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–121, title I, §1014(c)(2), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1222

Section, Pub. L. 102–580, title II, §206, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4828; Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §227(c)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700, related to construction of shoreline protection projects by non-Federal interests.