alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §26a. Additional portion of Calumet River, old channel, abandoned as navigable water

The portion of the old channel of the Calumet River in sections eighteen and nineteen, township thirty-seven north, range fifteen east, of the third principal meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, which lies outside of the new channel lines established by the United States and shown on the map referred to in section 26 of this title, and which lies outside of the exterior limits of the turning basin to be established on said Calumet River in said sections, is abandoned as navigable water of the United States from and after the time when the United States shall have secured title to the land necessary for the establishment of the turning basin at some point, to be approved by the Chief of Engineers, between One hundred and thirteenth Street and One hundred and seventeenth Street in the city of Chicago.

(Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 144, §1, 37 Stat. 816.)
§ 2430.7 When an application may be filed; referral to Administrative Law Judge; stay of proceeding. ( a ) An application may be filed after entry of the final order establishing that the applicant has prevailed in the proceeding, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding, but in no case later than thirty (30) days after the entry of the Authority's final order in the proceeding. The application for an award shall be filed with the Authority in Washington, DC, in an original and four copies, and served on all parties to the unfair labor practice proceeding. Service of the application shall be in the same manner as prescribed in §§ 2429.22 and 2429.27. Upon filing, the application shall be referred by the Authority to the Administrative Law Judge who heard the proceeding upon which the application is based, or, in the event the proceeding had not previously been heard by an Administrative Law Judge, it shall be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for designation of an Administrative Law Judge, to consider the application. When the Administrative Law Judge to whom the application has been referred is or becomes unavailable, the provisions of § 2423.20 shall be applicable.
( b ) Proceedings for the award of fees and other expenses, but not the time limit of this section for filing an application for an award, shall be stayed pending final disposition of the case, in the event any persons seeks Authority reconsideration or court review of the Authority decision that forms the basis for the application for fees and expenses.
§ 2638.105 Government ethics responsibilities of lead human resources officials. ( a ) The lead human resources official, as defined in § 2638.603, acting directly or through delegees, is responsible for: ( 1 ) Promptly notifying the DAEO of all appointments to positions that require incumbents to file public or confidential financial disclosure reports, with the notification occurring prior to appointment whenever practicable but in no case occurring more than 15 days after appointment; and
( 2 ) Promptly notifying the DAEO of terminations of employees in positions that require incumbents to file public financial disclosure reports, with the notification occurring prior to termination whenever practicable but in no case occurring more than 15 days after termination.
( b ) The lead human resources official may be assigned certain additional ethics responsibilities by the agency. ( 1 ) If an agency elects to assign such responsibilities to human resources officials, the lead human resources official is responsible for coordinating, to the extent necessary and practicable, with the DAEO to support the agency's ethics program;
( 2 ) If the lead human resources official is responsible for conducting ethics training pursuant to subpart C of this part, that official must follow the DAEO's directions regarding applicable requirements, procedures, and the qualifications of any presenters, consistent with the requirements of this chapter;
( 3 ) If the lead human resources official is responsible for issuing the required government ethics notices in written offers of employment, pursuant to § 2638.303, or providing supervisory ethics notices, pursuant to § 2638.306, that official must comply with any substantive and procedural requirements established by the DAEO, consistent with the requirements of this chapter; and
( 4 ) To the extent applicable, the lead human resources official is required to provide the DAEO with a written summary and confirmation regarding procedures for implementing certain requirements of subpart C of this part by January 15 each year, pursuant to § 2638.310.
( c ) Nothing in this section prevents an agency head from delegating the duties described in paragraph (b) of this section to another agency official. In the event that an agency head delegates the duties described in paragraph (b) of this section to an agency official other than the lead human resources official, the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section will apply to that official.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-043 November 10, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC CLOSELY MONITORING EFFORTS TO DETERMINE STATUS 

OF SPENT FUEL SEGMENTS UNACCOUNTED FOR AT HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials said today that the agency is closely monitoring

efforts by Southern Nuclear Operating Co. to determine the disposition of pieces of spent nuclear fuel

which cannot be accounted for in the spent fuel storage pools at the Hatch nuclear power plant near

Baxley, Ga.

Loren R. Plisco, deputy administrator of the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, said the company

has reported to the NRC that it has been unable to reconcile its inventory based on an initial review of

records of spent fuel storage locations and visual verifications of fuel within the plant’s spent fuel

pools. The company told the NRC it estimates that, collectively, the fuel rod pieces total

approximately 68 inches.

“The NRC in February ordered all commercial nuclear power plant licensees to inventory their

spent fuel pools,” Plisco said. The company initiated its examination of the contents in May. The

company completed its initial spent fuel assessment on Oct.28 and reported to the NRC today the

identification of possible fuel pins and other pieces for which there was no inventory or accounting. 

NRC officials said agency inspectors have been monitoring the company’s progress as fuel

pieces were found and collected from the spent fuel pools, beginning with the first indication of an

accounting problem last May. The NRC this week has been conducting an on-site inspection of the

plant’s material control and accounting program as a followup to the NRC Bulletin. 

Because of extensive radiological and security measures in place, NRC officials said it is highly

unlikely that the material is in an uncontrolled location or that it poses any risk to the public.

The NRC said its inspectors will closely follow an exhaustive investigation of what happened

to the missing pieces and of what caused the problem. The investigation may take several months.

###
# THEAITORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS GROVRR SRLIJXRS **Auwrme ’**  11. TEXAS A-- ammmuA&

Honorable

C. H. Cevness StateAuditor Austin, Terns Deer Mr..

Cevnessr opinionNo. O-5010 Rer Disposition

of funds in dormant bank eooountsbelonging to iwates of State penitentiaries. Your requestfor en opinion upon the above subject matter is es follows* "This is to respectfully request

your opiniones to what is to be do& in the following

situation

which has come to our attention during the ooursc of our' ourrent

audit ofthe eoeounts end recordsof the Texas Prison System: 'There his a cesh balanceof #3,265&4 in e Huntsville Hank in en accountentitled 'Rschset Fund*which rep resents

money that belongs to, or has ,belonged to, in;,,

'~~~Y~y_~,~,; metes who hers escapedor died or, in same dnstences, been diseherged(end presentwbcreabouts unlu~me~)

-- " all of whom have failed to get theirmoney. The eocount dates beck over e long period of years and has been gradually built up with deposits transferred

from another bank eocountin which.is kept the active accounts of the imuetes'

personalfunds. "Whet should

be donewith these funds?" h the fundsmentioned by you constitute

an account

which has been dormantfor such time as to authorize an escheat

proceeding,

the procedura is euthorieed and defined

by Article 3273 of the RevisedCivil Statutes

of Texas,whioh reads as follows: "When the distriot

or county

attorney shall bs informed, or have reasbn to believe,that any estate, reel or personal, is in the conditionspecified in the preceding article,

he shell file e s~rn petition which shell s et forth a description of the estate,the name of the person last lawfully seieedor possessed of same, the name of the tenantsor persons in actual possession, if any, and the names of the persons claiming the cstats, if any such erc known to claim or.whos claimmey be discovered by the axercise

of reasonable

diligence,

and the facts end circlrmstsncea in consequence

of which such estate is claimedto havs escheated and theHowrabls C. Ii. Caress, page 2 (o-6010)

'diligence

&xercisad

to liiscovcr

the claimauts

of same,pruyizg

that sac!; property,b escheated and for a writ of posssssion'cherefor in bek.alf

cf the State." We jlaud you hzreviith

copy of cur Opinion No. O-5644,sd!r;fcsed to HonoraI?le

Jesse Jsmcs,State Treasurer, dealing

withthe sma .;xestioas that you present. Verytruly yours ATKXNEY GEBEBbLOF TEXAS By /s/Ode Spear

Ocie Spew Assistant
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         64,640
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (48,215)
<INVENTORY>                                    879,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,604,081
<PP&E>                                         1,093,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (423,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,341,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,281,140
<BONDS>                                        45,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,060,000
<COMMON>                                       9,324,601
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,368,809)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,341,932
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,439
<CGS>                                          115,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,114,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             432,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,301,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,301,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,301,753)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
### §467d. National dam inventory

The Secretary of the Army shall maintain and update information on the inventory of dams in the United States. Such inventory of dams shall include any available information assessing each dam based on inspections completed by either a Federal agency or a State dam safety agency.

(Pub. L. 92–367, §6, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(8), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3687; amended Pub. L. 109–460, §1(b), Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3401.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 467d, Pub. L. 92–367, §5, Aug. 8, 1972, 86 Stat. 507, directed Secretary report to Congress on or before July 1, 1974, on activities under this subchapter, including in report an inventory of dams in the United States, a review of each inspection made, recommendations to State Governors and implementation of those recommendations, recommendations for comprehensive national program for inspection and safety regulation, and recommendations on responsibilities which should be assumed by Federal, State, and local governments and by public and private interests, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3685.

A prior section 6 of Pub. L. 92–367 was classified to section 467e of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303.

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–460 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may maintain and periodically publish updated information on the inventory of dams in the United States."
###### Editorial Note on Part 356

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

#### § 356.30 Sanctions for violations of a protective order for privileged information.

The provisions of this subpart shall apply to persons who are alleged to have violated a Protective Order for Privileged Information.
#### Leo Aarons, Appellant, v. Insurance Company of North America et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
§ 2635.701 Overview. This subpart contains provisions relating to the proper use of official time and authority, and of information and resources to which employees have access because of their Federal employment. This subpart sets forth standards relating to: ( a ) Use of public office for private gain;
( b ) Use of nonpublic information;
( c ) Use of Government property; and
( d ) Use of official time.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-036 August 4, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION IN SOUTH CAROLINA

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region II office in Atlanta have assigned

Daniel (Dan) Rich as the Senior Resident Inspector at the Oconee nuclear power plant in upstate South

Carolina.

Rich joined the NRC as a Reactor Engineer in the Division of Reactor Projects in Region III in

June 1996. In February 1997, he was assigned as the Resident Inspector at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant

in Spring City, Tenn. In December, 2001, he was assigned as the Senior Resident Inspector at Nuclear

Fuel Services in Erwin, Tenn.

Prior to joining the NRC, Rich was a U.S. Navy officer and served on the submarines USS

Houston, USS Salt Lake City, and USS Casimir Pulaski. 

Rich earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering at California

Polytechnic State University.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work projects and interfacing with plant workers and the public.

Rich joins Resident Inspectors Andy Hutto and Eric Riggs and Secretary Mary Jordan at the

Oconee Nuclear Station. The NRC staff at Oconee can be reached by calling 864-882-6927.

###
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00108

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C .P. AND B.P., CHILDR EN

From the 12th District Court Madison County, Texas Trial Court No. 18

- 15004

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

On April 26, 2019, Carrie M. McKerley filed a motion for withdrawal of counsel in
this Court. McKerley states that she was attorney of record in the trial proceedings, but
was discharged as attorney of record in the final order on March 7, 2019.
We abate this appeal to the trial court to hold a hearing within 21 days of the date

of this order to determin e: (1) whether Joshua Pursley desires to continue the appeal; and
(2) whether Joshua Pursley should be appointed new counsel on appeal. The
supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records, if any, are ordered to be filed within 30 d ays

of the date of this Orde r.In the Interest of C.P. and B.P. Page 2 PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal abated Order issued and filed May 1, 2019
§ 1216.207 Restrictions that apply to testimony. ( a ) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the testimony of MSPB employees including, for example: ( 1 ) Limiting the areas of testimony;
( 2 ) Requiring the requester and other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal;
( 3 ) Requiring that the transcript will be used or made available only in the particular legal proceeding for which testimony was requested. The General Counsel may also require a copy of the transcript of testimony at the requester's expense.
( b ) The MSPB may offer the employee's written declaration in lieu of testimony.
( c ) If authorized to testify pursuant to this part, an employee may testify as to facts within his or her personal knowledge, but, unless specifically authorized to do so by the General Counsel, the employee shall not; ( 1 ) Disclose confidential or privileged information; or
( 2 ) For a current MSPB employee, testify as an expert or opinion witness with regard to any matter arising out of the employee's official duties or the functions of the MSPB unless testimony is being given on behalf of the United States (see also 5 CFR 2635.805).
( d ) The scheduling of an employee's testimony, including the amount of time that the employee will be made available for testimony, will be subject to the MSPB's approval.
### §523. Relocation of bridges

If the owner of any bridge and the Secretary shall agree that in order to remove an obstruction to navigation, or for any other purpose, a relocation of such bridge or the construction of a new bridge upon a new location would be preferable to an alteration of the existing bridge, such relocation or new construction may be carried out at such new site and upon such terms as may be acceptable to the bridge owner and the Secretary, and the cost of such relocation or new construction, including also any expense of changes in and additions to rights-of-way, stations, tracks, spurs, sidings, switches, signals, and other railroad facilities and property, and relocation of shippers required for railroad connection with the bridge at the new site, shall be apportioned as between the bridge owner and the United States in the manner which is provided for in section 516 of this title in the case of an alteration and the share of the United States paid from the appropriation authorized in section 518 of this title: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the United States to pay any part of the expense of building any bridge across a navigable stream which the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall not find to be, in fact, a relocation of an existing bridge.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §13, 54 Stat. 502; July 16, 1952, ch. 889, §4, 66 Stat. 733; Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2440; Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §306(b)(4)(D), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 55.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–120 substituted "Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating" for "Secretary of Transportation".

1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Secretary of War". See Transfer of Functions note below.

1952—Act July 16, 1952, struck out "used for railroad traffic" after "owner of any bridge".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Section 6(g)(3) of Pub. L. 89–670 transferred functions, powers, and duties of Secretary of the Army [formerly War] and other officers and offices of Department of the Army [formerly War] relating to obstructive bridges under this subchapter to Secretary of Transportation. Pub. L. 97–449 amended this section to reflect transfer made by section 6(g)(3) of Pub. L. 89–670, and repealed section 6(g)(3).
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-097 July 24, 2006

NRC COMPLETES STAFF REVIEW OF

CLINTON EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final environmental impact statement

(EIS) on the proposed Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Clinton site, about six miles east of Clinton, Ill.

The report contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would prevent

issuing the ESP. Combined with the recent issuance of a final Safety Evaluation Report on the

application, this marks the end of the staff’s technical review on the Clinton ESP, although additional

steps must be completed before the NRC reaches a final decision on the matter.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The Clinton

application was filed Sept. 25, 2003, by Exelon Generation Company, LLC. If approved, the permit

would give Exelon up to 20 years to decide whether to build a new nuclear unit on the site and to file

an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

The NRC staff’s conclusion is based on its independent review of a report submitted by Exelon,

taking into account consultations with federal, state, tribal and local organizations, and consideration of

comments received during the public scoping process. The staff’s conclusions include a finding that

there are no obviously superior alternative sites, and that any adverse environmental impacts from

possible site preparation and preliminary construction activities at Clinton could be redressed.

The final EIS and related documents are available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. They are also available on the

NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1815/ . In addition,

the Vespasian Warner Public Library, located at 310 North Quincy Street in Clinton, will have a copy

of the EIS available for public inspection.

 With the technical review complete, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel must

conduct a mandatory hearing on the matter before the Commission can reach a final decision on issuing

the permit. The NRC expects to finish this process for the Clinton ESP by mid-2007.

###
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-05-0160 - Phase I Report and Recommendations on Congressional District Outreach Effort

Accession Number: ML052340249

Date Released: Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML052380486 - SECY-05-0160 - Phase I Report and Recommendations on Congressional District Outreach Effort w/ attach 2 & 3 (15 page(s), 9/1/2005)
    - ML050100073 - 01/10/2005 Memo to Multiple Addressees Re Congressional District Outreach (Enclosures:  Working Group Charter and Congressional District Office Contacts). (8 page(s), 1/10/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer