alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
472 P.2d 387

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry SEGURA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 453.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

May 15, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 5, 1970.

Certiorari Denied July 2, 1970.

James T. Roach, Albuquerque, for appellant.

James A. Maloney, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, Frank N. Chavez, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

SPIESS, Chief Judge.

Defendant was convicted of a crime of robbery (§ 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953, Repl. Vol. 6). His appeal is presented upon a single point — that the trial court erred in refusing the following requested instruction :

> “Even though there is evidence of touching, jostling or falling of the victim as the property was taken, this evidence alone is insufficient to prove use or threatened use of force or violence.”

The record discloses that Mrs. Elizabeth Love, the victim, was walking home and carrying a shopping bag which contained her purse. As she proceeded she noticed a young man walking behind her. She testified: “ * * * I hesitated just a minute so he would get ahead of me and at that moment why he put his hands on my shopping bag and my purse; my purse was inside my shopping bag.”

At another point in the record she testified: “* * * Well, he grabbed the handles (of the shopping bag), I held on pretty tightly, and he — well, he went back across the street to the other side and I was holding on very tightly and then as I got off the sidewalk why he pulled it away, the shopping bag tore and he got my purse. * * * ” “I lost my balance when he pulled that shopping bag away and I fell. * * * ”

Section 40A-16-2, supra, defines robbery as consisting “of the theft of anything of value from the person of another or from the immediate control of another, by use or threatened use of force or violence.”

In State v. Sanchez, 78 N.M. 284, 430 P.2d 781 (Ct.App. 1967), we said:

> “ * * * robbery may be committed (1) by use of force or violence or (2) by threatened use of force or violence. As explained in 2 Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure, § 554:

> “ ‘It is essential that the defendant accomplish the taking of the property by means of force or violence or by intimidating or putting the victim in fear.’ ”

We further said:

> “Where force is charged, the issue is not how much force was used, but whether the force was sufficient to compel the victim to part with his property.”

Since the amount or degree of force is not the determinative factor, evi*674dence of jostling or causing the victim to fall as property is taken may constitute a showing sufficient to establish the use of force. Mrs. Love’s testimony makes it clear that her fall was an incident of the force employed in the taking of her purse.

The instruction requested by defendant was properly refused in that it is an incorrect statement of law and not warranted by the evidence. Further, the requested instruction might tend to mislead the jury and invade its province.

Authorities cited by appellant do not compel a different result.

The judgment is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

OMAN and WOOD, JJ., concur.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Hanmi Financial Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-177996, 333-164690, and 333-163206) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-115753, 333-122482, 333-149858, and 333-191855) on Form S-8 of Hanmi Financial Corporation of our report dated February 29, 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Hanmi Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 10-K of Hanmi Financial Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Los Angeles, California


February 29, 2016
NRC NEWS

 U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-07-019 June 12, 2007

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTORS

AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Nicholas Taylor as the senior resident

inspector and Michael Chambers as the new resident inspector at the Cooper Nuclear Station in

Brownville, Neb.

Taylor previously served as the resident inspector at the plant, which is operated by the

Nebraska Public Power District, and as a project engineer in the NRC’s Region IV office in

Arlington, Texas.

He holds a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from Iowa State

University, and a master’s degree in management from North Carolina State University.

Prior to joining the NRC in 2004, Taylor served 12 years as a commissioned officer in

the U.S. Navy aboard several nuclear submarines. 

Chambers served onboard a nuclear submarine in the U.S. Navy and holds a bachelor of

science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas. Prior to joining the

NRC in 2006, Chambers worked at the Turkey Point nuclear plant in Florida for eight years and

at the South Texas Project nuclear plant where he helped finish initial construction. 

The Cooper resident inspectors can be reached at (402) 825-3371.

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring

significant work activities and interacting with plant workers and the public.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html. The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 3201.106 Employment of family members outside the Corporation. ( a ) *Disqualification of employees.* An employee shall not participate in an examination, audit, investigation, application, contract, or other particular matter if the employer of the employee's spouse, child, parent, brother, sister, or a member of the employee's household is a party or represents a party to the matter, unless an agency designee authorizes the employee to participate using the standard in 5 CFR 2635.502(d).
( b ) *Reporting certain relationships.* A covered employee shall make a written report to an agency designee within 30 days of the employment of the employee's spouse, child, parent, brother, sister, or a member of the employee's household by: ( 1 ) An FDIC-insured depository institution or its affiliate;
( 2 ) A firm or business with which, to the employee's knowledge, the Corporation has a contractual or other business or financial relationship; or
( 3 ) A firm or business which, to the employee's knowledge, is seeking a business or contractual relationship with the Corporation.
§ 358.103 Importation of supplies. ( a ) Where the President, acting under section 318 of the Act, authorizes the Secretary to permit the importation of supplies for use in emergency relief work free of antidumping and countervailing duties, the Secretary shall consider requests for such importation under the following conditions: ( 1 ) Before importation, a written request shall be submitted to the Secretary by the person in charge of sending the subject merchandise from the foreign country or by the person for whose account it will be brought into the United States. Three copies of the request should be submitted to the Secretary of Commerce, Attention: Enforcement and Compliance, Central Records Unit, Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
( 2 ) The request shall state the Department antidumping and/or countervailing duty order case number, the producer of the merchandise, a detailed description of the merchandise, the current HTS number, the price in the United States, the quantity, the proposed date of entry, the proposed port of entry, the mode of transport, the person for whose account the merchandise will be brought into the United States, the destination, the use to be made of the merchandise at the designated destination, and any other information the person would like the Secretary to consider.
( b ) If the Secretary determines to permit duty-free importation of particular merchandise for use in emergency relief work, the Secretary will notify the person who submitted the request, instruct CBP to allow entry of the merchandise identified in the request submitted under paragraph (a) without regard to antidumping and countervailing duties, and post notification of the determination on the Department's website.
( c ) Any subject merchandise entered under paragraph (b) of this section must enter the United States normally within 60 days after the date on which the Secretary notifies the person who submitted the request or the merchandise will be subject to antidumping and/or countervailing duties, as applicable.
( d ) Any subject merchandise entered under paragraph (b) of this section which is used in the United States other than for a purpose contemplated for it by section 318(a) of the Act may be subject to seizure or other penalty, including under section 592 of the Act.
( e ) Any subject merchandise entered under paragraph (b) of this section is subject to the Department's reporting requirements in its conduct of an antidumping and/or countervailing duty administrative or new shipper review, as applicable.
( f ) Any subject merchandise entered under paragraph (b) of this section will be excluded from: ( 1 ) The calculation of assessment and cash deposit rates in an administrative or new shipper review under section 751(a) of the Act;
( 2 ) “Commercial quantities” under 19 CFR 351.222; and
( 3 ) The quantity allowed by, or revised price requirements established pursuant to, a suspension agreement under section 704 or section 734 of the Act, as applicable.
[71 FR 63234, Oct. 30, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 77354, Dec. 23, 2013]
#### § 337.301 Coverage and purpose.

This subpart implements the category rating and selection procedures at 5 U.S.C. 3319. This law authorizes agencies with delegated examining authority under 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) to develop a category rating method as an alternative process to assess applicants for jobs filled through competitive examining.
•

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the

e-ORI@dol.gov.

http://

www.regulations.gov

http://

www.dol.gov/ebsa,

•

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the

2009, p. 1–9. See www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/1975-

2006historicaltables.pdf.

be accessed at http://www.gao.gov/

new.items/d09642.pdf.

be accessed at www.gao.gov/new.items/

d088.pdf.

be accessed at http://www.gao.gov/

new.items/d03810.pdf.

be accessed at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/

publications/AC-1107a.html.

www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/

2008ACreport3.html.

•

Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the

be posted without change to http://

www.regulations.gov including any

docket through the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov or in person at t
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 07-049                                                                                                                  April 17, 2007

 NRC ISSUES FINAL RULES ON LIMITED WORK AUTHORIZATIONS,

WORKER FATIGUE/DRUG-TESTING PROVISIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved the issuance of amended regulationsregarding the issuance of limited work authorizations (LWA) for construction related to new nuclearpower plants. The Commission also approved the issuance of updated “fitness-for-duty” requirements,such as work hour limits and drug and alcohol testing, at nuclear power plants. The rules will becomeeffective following publication in the Federal Register later this year.

The new work authorization regulation defines “construction” that requires either an LWA, aPart 50 construction permit or a combined license. Under the final rule, no LWA, permit or license isrequired for activities such as site clearing, transmission line routing, excavation, road building anderecting construction-related support buildings or service facilities. An LWA, construction permit orlicense is required, however, for activities including pile-driving and foundation work for structures,systems or components with high importance to safe operation and security at a nuclear power plant.Activities beyond these, however, would require a full construction permit or combined license.

The new work authorization regulation allows applications for an authorization to be submittedin advance of a complete application for a construction permit or combined license. For a site where aconstruction permit was issued but no plant was built, the LWA application could reference an existingenvironmental impact statement for the site, taking into account the possible need for updatedinformation. A draft version of this rule was published for public comment in the Federal Register inOctober 2006.

The amended fitness-for-duty regulations apply to all currently operating nuclear power plantsand any future plants the NRC approves. Many of the regulations will also cover workers atconstruction sites for new reactors. A draft version of this rule was published for public comment in theFederal Register in August 2005. 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.904 Eligibility. This subpart covers only eligible employees transferred or detailed to Commission positions with duty stations in the Republic of Panama. ( a ) *Employees eligible.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, an employee serving in a position in an agency under any of the following appointments may be granted rights under this subpart: ( 1 ) Career or career-conditional appointment in the competitive service;
( 2 ) An appointment without a specific time limit in the excepted service; or
( 3 ) A career appointment in the Senior Executive Service.
( b ) *Employee not eligible.* The following employees are not eligible under this subpart: ( 1 ) An employee who is serving a trial period or probationary period under an initial appointment;
( 2 ) An employee who has received a proposed notice of involuntary separation (e.g., separation based on reduction in force, adverse action, or performance);
( 3 ) An employee who is serving in a position excepted from the competitive service under Schedule C of part 213 of this chapter, or under Presedential appointment; or
( 4 ) An employee whose resignation has been accepted for reasons other than to accept employment with the Commission.
[50 FR 13963, Apr. 9, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 10125, Mar. 24, 1992]
#### § 1636.102 Application.

This part (§§ 1636.101-1636.170) applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****On the beat: community orientedpolicing services.**
 
1998: Summer | 1999: FallSummer| 2000: Spring
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.107:
Item Number:0717-A-08 | 717-A-08(online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
September 27, 2018
906 CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-K of The Movie Studio, Inc. F/K/A Destination Television, Inc. for the Year Ended October 31, 2009 I, Gordon Scott Venters, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Movie Studio, Inc. F/K/A Destination Television, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.   Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Movie Studio, Inc. F/K/A Destination Television, Inc.





Dated:  December 26, 2012





THE MOVIE STUDIO, INC. F/K/A DESTINATION TELEVISION, INC.






By: /s/ Gordon Scott Venters


Gordon Scott Venters


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
#### § 550.301 Definitions.

In this subpart:

*Agency* means an Executive agency as defined by section 105 of Title 5, United States Code.

*Allotment* means a recurring specified deduction for a legal purpose from pay authorized by an employee to be paid to an allottee.

*Allottee* means the person or institution to whom an allotment is made payable.

*Allotter* means the employee from whose pay an allotment is made.

*Association of management officials and/or supervisors* means an association composed of either management officials and/or supervisors with which the agency has established official relationships.

*Combined Federal Campaign* means an organization of voluntary health and welfare agencies authorized to solicit charitable contributions in a local area in accordance with arrangements prescribed by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management under Executive Order 10927.

*Continental United States* means the several States and the District of Columbia, but excluding Alaska and Hawaii.

*Dues* means the regular periodic amount specified by an allotter to be withheld from his or her pay which is required to maintain the allotter as a member in good standing in a labor organization or association of management officials and/or supervisors or other organization.

*Employee* means an employee of an agency who satisfies the definition of that term in 5 U.S.C. 2105.

*Foreign affairs agency* means the Department of State, the International Communications Agency, the Agency for International Development and its successor agency or agencies.

*Labor organization* means a labor organization as defined by section 7103(a)(4) of title 5, United States Code, unless specified otherwise.

[46 FR 2325, Jan. 9, 1981, as amended at 65 FR 44644, July 19, 2000; 71 FR 66828, Nov. 17, 2006]
### §891a. Fleet replacement and modernization program

The Secretary is authorized to implement, subject to the requirements of this subchapter, a 15-year program to replace and modernize the NOAA fleet.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title VI, §603, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4300.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title VI of Pub. L. 102–567, which enacted this subchapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHelicopter impulsive noise:  Theoretical and experimental statusThe theoretical and experimental status of helicopter impulsive noise is reviewed. The two major source mechanisms of helicopter impulsive noise are addressed: high-speed impulsive noise and blade-vortex interaction impulsive noise. A thorough physical explanation of both generating mechanism is presented together with model and full-scale measurements of the phenomena. Current theoretical prediction methods are compared with experimental findings of isolated rotor tests. The noise generating mechanism of high speed impulsive noise are fairly well understood - theory and experiment compare nicely over Mach number ranges typical of today's helicopters. For the case of blade-vortex interaction noise, understanding of noise generating mechanisms and theoretical comparison with experiment are less satisfactory. Several methods for improving theory-experiment are suggested.Document ID19840010982Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchmitz, F. H.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Yu, Y. H.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1983Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:84390USAAVRADCOM-TR-83-A-2A-9477NASA-TM-84390Accession Number84N19050Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010982.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §3844. Additional authority of the Administrator

The Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary, may establish, as necessary, terms and conditions regarding the removal and disposal of antifouling systems prohibited or restricted under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1034, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3023, which enacted this chapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title X to the Code, see Tables.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T00:53:25-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office