alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015230EN.01002801.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/28

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 225/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) and Annex IV (Energy) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1449]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Directive 85/536/EEC of 5 December 1985 on crude-oil savings through the use of substitute fuel components in petrol (1) was repealed by Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC (2), which are both incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently Directive 85/536/EEC should be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Directive 85/536/EEC of 5 December 1985 on crude-oil savings through the use of substitute fuel components in petrol (1) was repealed by Directive 98/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC (2), which are both incorporated into the EEA Agreement, and consequently Directive 85/536/EEC should be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annexes II and IV to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 1 (Council Directive 85/536/EEC) of Chapter XXVI of Annex II to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 2

The text of point 6 (Council Directive 85/536/EEC) of Annex IV to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 334, 12.12.1985, p. 20.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
NRC NEWS                 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                     2443 Warrenville Road                                                             Lisle IL 60532                             Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov  E-mail:  opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-07-003                                         February 22, 2007CONTACT: Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662  

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $6,500 FINE FOR SECURITY VIOLATIONSAT MATERIALS TESTING FACILITY IN PENNSYLVANIA

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $6,500 fine against MISTRASHolding Group of Carol Stream, Ill., for failing to institute certain security measures at its ConamInspection and Engineering Services facility in Trainer, Penn.

The company holds an NRC license for the use of sealed radiation sources to performradiography, a non-destructive testing technique which uses radiation to produce x-ray-like images ofheavy metal objects.

In November 2005, the NRC issued an Order to MISTRAS and to similar firms, imposingcertain additional security requirements for the storage and protection of the radiation sources.  Aninspection by the NRC’s Region I office in King of Prussia, Penn., in June and July 2006 identified five violations of NRC security requirements associated with that Order including two that are subjectof the proposed fine.

“The $6,500 fine is being proposed because the company failed to take the necessary securityprecautions intended to properly safeguard the radioactive materials used in their inspection work,”said James Caldwell, Regional Administrator of the NRC’s Region III Office which oversees thelicensed work by MISTRAS at several facilities across the country.  “Those security violations werepromptly corrected,” he added, “and the Trainer facility now maintains adequate security for itsradioactive materials.”

MISTRAS has until March 23 to pay the fine or to protest it.  If the fine is protested andsubsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the company may request a hearing.

Because the violations involved security measures at the facility, the details of the requirementsand the violations are not being publicly disclosed.

# # # # #

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address:http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link.E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### § 353.109 Transfer of function to another agency.

If the function of an employee absent because of uniformed service or compensable injury is transferred to another agency, and if the employee would have been transferred with the function under part 351 of this chapter had he or she not been absent, the employee is entitled to be placed in a position in the gaining agency that is equivalent to the one he or she left. It shall also assume the obligation to restore the employee in accordance with law and this part.
#### § 250.201 Coverage and purpose.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1103(c), this subpart defines a set of systems, including standards and metrics, for assessing the management of human capital by Federal agencies. These regulations apply to agencies covered by 31 U.S.C. 901(b) of the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-576), as well as 5 U.S.C. 1401 and support the performance planning and reporting that is required by sections 1115(a)(3) and (f) and 1116(d)(5) of title 31, United States Code.

[83 FR 55931, Nov. 9, 2018]
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.303 [Reserved]
Bam Entertainment, Inc. Exhibit 10.1(b)



 


Exhibit 10.1(b)


Acclaim Entertainment Ltd.

Moreau House

112-120 Brompton Road

London SW3 1JJ



November 25th, 2003


BAM Entertainment Limited

Upper Borough Court

Borough Wells

Bath

BA1 1RG



Re Acclaim Entertainment Inc. -w- BAM Entertainment Limited



Gentlemen:


Further to our letter of intent dated July 17, 2003:


We acknowledge and accept delivery of the following products prior to October
31st, 2003



	 	 	 	Wallace & Gromit PS2 - PAL - French, Italian, German, Spanish

Wallace & Gromit PC - All languages

Wallace & Gromit XBox  - PAL - French, Italian, German, Spanish

Wallace & Gromit Gamecube - PAL - French, Italian, German, Spanish



We waive our right under Clause 6 (c) (iii) to terminate the aforementioned
Game Titles, and we waive our right under Clause 6 (c) (iv) to reduce the
minimum guarantees for the aforementioned games.



	 	 	 
	 	 	
Sincerely

Acclaim Entertainment Limited
	 	 	 
	 	By 	
 /s/ Simon Hosken
Connecticut Department of 

### ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Marcia 12, 2012 Mr. David Conroy EPA Region 1 Office of Ecosystem Protection 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston MA 02109-3912 Re: Clarification of Connecticut’s 2008 PMzs Attainment Demonstration Dear Mr. Conroy: By this correspondence, I request the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accept the enclosed text of section 22a-174-22 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (RCSA) as a supplement and clarification to the Fine Particulate Matter (PMzs) Attainment Demonstration submitted to EPA by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection ~ (Department) on 18 November 2008. The Department, while citing RCSA section 22a-174-22(e)(3) as a post-2002 control measure in Table 4-3 of the 2008 PMz5 Attainment Demonstration, did not include the regulatory text in the Control Measure Appendix (Appendix). The Appendix should have included all of the post-2002 control measures not previously submitted as revisions to Connecticut’s State Implementation Plan (SIP). Furthermore, all of the documentation necessary to satisfy the public participation requirements of 40 CFR 51 with respect to RCSA section 22a-174-22(e)(3) were already included within the Appendix because it included RCSA section 22a-!74-19a, which was adopted in the same public process as RCSA section 22a-174-22(e)(3). The only document not included in the Appendix is the regulatory text of RCSA section 22a-174-22(e)(3), which is enclosed herewith. I thank your staff for bringing this oversight to the Department’s attention, and t look forward to this submission assisting EPA with the review of Connecticut’s Regional Haze SIP. Sincerely,

Anne Gobin, Chief Bureau of Air Management Anne Arnold (via electronic mail to arnold.anne@e a~~o_Zv) Anne McWilliams (via electronic mail to mcwilliams.anne@e_l~Ln_~.~g~)

~ On July I, 2011, pursuant to Public Act 11-80, the Department of Environmental Protection became the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. 79 Elm Street ° Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Actlon/Equal Opportunity Employer
### §10151. Name of program

#### (a) In general

The grant program established under this part shall be known as the "Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program".

#### (b) References to former programs

(1) Any reference in a law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Programs, or to the Local Government Law Enforcement Block Grants program, shall be deemed to be a reference to the grant program referred to in subsection (a).

(2) Any reference in a law, regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to section 506 of this Act as such section was in effect on the date of the enactment of the Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2009,1 shall be deemed to be a reference to section 505(a) of this Act as amended by the Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2009.1

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §500, as added Pub. L. 100–690, title VI, §6091(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4329; amended Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1111(a)(2)(B), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3094.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is Pub. L. 90–351, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 197, known as the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. Former section 506 of the Act was classified to section 3756 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1111(a)(1), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3094. Section 505(a) of the Act is classified to section 10156(a) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1968 Act note set out under section 10101 of this title and Tables.

The Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 2006 through 2009, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), probably means the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109–162, Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 2960, which repealed former section 3756 of this title and enacted section 10156 of this title. See note above.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3750 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–162 substituted "Name of program" for "Name of programs" in section catchline and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The grant programs established under this subchapter shall be known as the 'Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Programs'."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, §1111(d), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3102, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [see Tables for classification] shall apply with respect to the first fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 5, 2006] and each fiscal year thereafter."

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 185.125 Protective order. ( a ) A party or a prospective witness or deponent may file a motion for a protective order with respect to discovery sought by an opposing party or with respect to the hearing, seeking to limit the availability or disclosure of evidence.
( b ) In issuing a protective order, the ALJ may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) That the discovery not be had;
( 2 ) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place;
( 3 ) That the discovery may be had only through a method of discovery other than that requested;
( 4 ) That certain matters not be the subject of inquiry, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters;
( 5 ) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the ALJ;
( 6 ) That the contents of discovery or evidence be sealed;
( 7 ) That a sealed deposition be opened only by order of the ALJ;
( 8 ) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, commercial information, or facts pertaining to any criminal investigation, proceeding, or other administrative investigation not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; or
( 9 ) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the ALJ.
#### § 3601.101 Purpose.

In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to employees of the Department of Defense (DoD) and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. DoD employees are required to comply with part 2635, this part, and implementing guidance and procedures.
### §3358. Interagency working group for Governmentwide payment integrity improvement

(a) Working Group.—

(1) Establishment.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this section, there is established an interagency working group on payment integrity—

(A) to improve—

(i) State-administered Federal programs to determine eligibility processes and data sharing practices;

(ii) the guidelines described in section 3357(b) and other best practices and techniques for detecting, preventing, and responding to improper payments, including improper payments that are the result of fraud; and

(iii) the sharing and development of data analytics techniques to help prevent and identify potential improper payments, including those that are the result of fraud; and

(B) to identify any additional activities that will improve payment integrity of Federal programs.

(2) Composition.—The interagency working group established under paragraph (1) shall be composed of—

(A) the Director of the Office of Management and Budget;

(B) 1 representative from each of the agencies described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 901(b) of this title; and

(C) any other representatives of other executive agencies determined appropriate by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, which may include the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Procurement Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, or the Chief Operating Officer of an executive agency.

(b) Consultation.—The working group established under subsection (a)(1) may consult with Offices of Inspectors General and Federal and non-Federal experts on fraud risk assessments, administrative controls over payment integrity, financial controls, and other relevant matters.

(c) Meetings.—The working group established under subsection (a)(1) shall hold not fewer than 4 meetings per year.

(d) Report.—Not later than 240 days after the date of enactment of this section, the working group established under subsection (a)(1) shall submit to Congress a report that includes—

(1) a plan containing tangible solutions to prevent and reduce improper payments; and

(2) a plan for State agencies to work with Federal agencies to regularly review lists of beneficiaries of State-managed Federal programs for duplicate enrollment between States, including how the Do Not Pay Business Center and the data analytics initiative of the Department of the Treasury could aid in the detection of duplicate enrollment.

(Added Pub. L. 116–117, §2(a), Mar. 2, 2020, 134 Stat. 132.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1) and (d), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 116–117, which was approved Mar. 2, 2020.
### §2331a. Initiating work on separable elements

With respect to a water resources development project that has received construction funds in the previous 6-year period, for purposes of initiating work on a separable element of the project—

(1) no new start or new investment decision shall be required; and

(2) the work shall be treated as ongoing work.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1146, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1659.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.
#### § 1201.157 Notice of right to judicial review.

Any final decision of the Board under 5 U.S.C. 7702 will notify the appellant of his or her right, within 30 days after receiving the Board's final decision, to petition the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to consider the Board's decision, or to file a civil action in an appropriate United States district court. If an appellant elects to waive the discrimination issue, an appeal may be filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as stated in § 1201.120 of this part.

[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 63 FR 41179, Aug. 3, 1998]
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Magic Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon  Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2005

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Gordon Scott Venters, President and Chief Executive Officer        (principal executive officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal        financial officer and principal accounting officer). |
#### Lancaster Sea Beach Improvement Company, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.

Motion granted in part. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Stapleton.
§ 2608.203 Filing requirements for demands or requests for documents or testimony. You must comply with the following requirements whenever you issue demands or requests to an OGE employee for official records and information or testimony: ( a ) Your request must be in writing and must be submitted to the General Counsel. If you serve a subpoena on OGE or an OGE employee before submitting a written request and receiving a final determination, OGE will oppose the subpoena on grounds that your request was not submitted in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) Your written request must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved;
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show relevance;
( 3 ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs the need to maintain any confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on OGE to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than an OGE employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, a general summary of the desired testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require with each OGE employee for time spent by the employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( c ) The Office of Government Ethics reserves the right to require additional information to complete your request where appropriate.
( d ) Your request should be submitted at least 45 days before the date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less than 45 days before records or testimony is required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request and the reasons for expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with your request.