alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §10229. Report to President and Congress

Not later than April 1 of each year, the Assistant Attorney General, the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, and the Director of the National Institute of Justice shall each submit a report to the President and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate, on their activities under this chapter during the fiscal year next preceding such date.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §810, formerly §816, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1209; renumbered §810 and amended Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609B(f), (i), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2093, 2095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3789e of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 810 of Pub. L. 90–351 was classified to section 3788 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to repeal by section 609B(e) of Pub. L. 98–473.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–473, §609B(i), substituted requirement of individual reports by certain officials of listed agencies to the President and the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate for former subsec. (a) through (e) provisions which included requirement of an annual report on or before March 31 of each year to the President and Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House, including description of scope of coverage; report covering receipt and compilation of evaluations, statistics, and performance reports, comprehensive statistics, analyses, and findings respecting attainment of described objectives; plan for collection, analysis, and evaluation of data for measurement of progress in prescribed and additional areas, definition of "comprehensive statistics" and "reasonably expected contribution"; attainment of reasonably expected contribution in prescribed and added areas; and data collection, including minimum duplication.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by section 609B(i) of Pub. L. 98–473 effective Oct. 12, 1984, see section 609AA(a) of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as an Effective Date note under section 10101 of this title.

#### Transfer of Functions

Effective Aug. 1, 2000, all functions of Director of Bureau of Justice Assistance, other than those enumerated in section 10142(3) to (6) of this title, transferred to Assistant Attorney General for Office of Justice Programs, see section 1000(a)(1) [title I, §108(b)] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 10141 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-018 April 20, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has initiated a special inspection at the Palisades Nuclear

Power Station where several plant workers received unintended radiation exposures early Wednesday

when a storage container holding irradiated equipment briefly rose to the surface of the water-filled

refueling area at the plant.

The plant, operated by Nuclear Management Co. at Covert, Mich., is shut down for refueling.

About six workers were manipulating a two-part storage container underwater in the refueling

area when an inner portion of the container, apparently buoyed by air inside, rose briefly to the surface. 

The workers were exposed to the radiation emitted from the highly radioactive equipment inside the

container. 

According to radiation detectors, worn by the workers, the maximum radiation exposure was

less than 50 millirems which is a small portion of the 5,000 millirem annual federal limit for radiation

workers. No adverse health effects would be expected from such radiation exposures, and no medical

treatment was necessary.

The NRC inspectors will review the circumstances surrounding the incident, including why air

remained trapped inside the container and what actions the workers were performing at the time of the

incident. The inspectors will also make an independent assessment of the radiation exposures received

by the workers.

The workers were preparing to open the shielded container under water when the incident

occurred. The container held neutron detectors which were previously installed in the reactor. The

neutron detectors in the reactor core are periodically replaced and stored prior to being sent offsite to a

radioactive waste disposal site.

The special inspection team will issue its report about 30 days after the completion of the

inspection. The report will be available from the Region III Office of Public Affairs or in the agency’s

online document library at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html .

###
#### Elizabeth Matousek et al., Respondents, v. Volkerts, Inc., Defendant, and Carrie Doering et al., as Executrices of Katherina Volkert, Deceased. Appellants.

In view of the long delay, in our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to grant the motion conditionally. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Reinstated; Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

January 15, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00415-CV

TEXAS CYPRESS CREEK HOSPITAL, L.P. 

D/B/A CYPRESS CREEK HOSPITAL, Appellant

V.

MYRA ANDERSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-49080

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is a restricted appeal from a default judgment signed October 28, 2011. 

On July 31, 2012, this court granted appellant’s motion to abate this appeal 

pending resolution of a related case styled Texas Cypress Creek Hospital, L.P. 

d/b/a Texas Cypress Creek Hospital v. Myra Anderson, et al., pending in the 125th 

District Court of Harris County, Texas under cause number 2012-26254. 
2

On January 4, 2013, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal

because the related case has been resolved, rendering this appeal moot. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1. We reinstate the appeal and grant the parties’ joint motion.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Boyce and Donovan.
#### Frank P. Hawkins et al., Appellees, v. Harry L. Taylor, Appellant.

Gen No. 5,872.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Appeal from the County Court of Lake county; the Hon Pebby L. Pebsohs, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Frank P. Hawkins and Bichard W. Hawkins, trading as Frank P. Hawkins and Company, against Harry L. Taylor to recover a commission for the sale of certain real estate belonging to defendant. The jury returned a verdict for'plaintiffs for one hundred and fifty dollars, and in addition a special finding that plaintiffs were the procuring and efficient cause of the sale. From a judgment entered on the verdict, defendant appeals.

Heydecker & Jorgenson and Samuel F. Knox, for appellant.

Henry E. Mason, for appellees.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number,

Mr Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

*356Abstract of the Decision.

1. Brokers, § *90*
      ***
      *—when evidence sufficient to sustain a recovery of commissions.*In an action for a commission for selling real estate belonging to defendant, a verdict for plaintiffs and a special finding that plaintiffs were the procuring cause of the sale, *held*sustained by the evidence, it appearing that defendant had listed the premises with plaintiffs to be sold at a certain price and that the defendant had consummated a sale with a purchaser whom the plaintiffs had negotiated with for the purchase of the property.

2. Brokers, § *48*
      ***
      *—when real estate agents entitled to a commission.*Where real estate agents were the procuring and efficient cause of a sale they are entitled to a commission though the owner completed the negotiations.

3. Appeal and error, § *1002*
      ***
      *—when sufficiency of evidence to support verdict not presented for review.*Where the abstract does not show that the bill of exceptions contains a motion for a new trial, it does not show that the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is presented by the record. The clerk’s record cannot supply the omission.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1701 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1701

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 167 East 124th Street in New York, New York, as the ``Tito Puente 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2003

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 167 East 124th Street in New York, New York, as the ``Tito Puente 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TITO PUENTE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 167 East 124th Street in New York, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Tito Puente Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Tito Puente 
Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 145 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 66
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 145

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2003

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             April 9, 2003

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
            New York, as the ``Ted Weiss Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, New York, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Ted Weiss Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ted Weiss Federal 
Building''.

                                                        Calendar No. 66

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 145

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 290 Broadway in New York, 
            New York, as the ``Ted Weiss Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 9, 2003

                       Reported without amendment
```
§ 297.602 Protecting Social Security numbers in mailed documents. ( a ) Social Security numbers must not be visible on the outside of any package OPM sends by mail or displayed on correspondence that is visible through the window of an envelope or package.
( b ) A document OPM sends by mail may only include a Social Security number if the Director of OPM determines, on the advice of the Senior Agency Official for Privacy, that the inclusion of a Social Security number on a document sent by mail is necessary and appropriate to meet legal and mission requirements.
( c ) The inclusion of a Social Security number on a document sent by mail is necessary when— ( 1 ) Required by law; or
( 2 ) Necessary to identify a specific person and no adequate substitute is available.
( d ) Social Security numbers must be partially redacted in documents sent by mail whenever feasible to mitigate any risks to privacy.
#### William Wendnagel et al., copartners as Wendnagel & Company, Appellees, v. George T. Houston et al., copartners as George T. Houston & Company, Appellants.

Gen. No. 19,382.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 21, 1914.

*40Statement of the Case.

Action by William Wendnagel and Eugene Wendnagel, copartners trading as Wendnagel & Company, against George T. Houston and Frank B. Houston, copartners trading as George T. Houston & Company, to recover damages for breach of contract in failing to deliver certain lumber which the defendant sold and agreed to deliver to plaintiffs. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for nine hundred dollars, defendants appeal.

Jesse Holdom and Frederick H. Wickett, for appellants; Jesse Holdom, of counsel.

Adams, Crews, Bobb & Westcott, for appellees.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Sales, § *373*
      ***
      *—when judgment for price sustained by the evidence.*In an action for breach of a contract to deliver lumber sold by defendant to plaintiff, a judgment in favor of plaintiff *held*sustained by the evidence.

2. Appeal and error, § *1514*
      ***
      *—when remarles of counsel not prejudicial error.*In an action for damages resulting from failure of defendant to deliver lumber under a contract, where the nondelivery of the lumber was conceded, remarks of counsel for the plaintiff in his closing argument to the jury as to the question why the lumber was not delivered, *held*not prejudicial error where objection to the remarks was sustained and the remarks were stricken out.

3. Appeal and error, § 1514*^iv7¡,e«. *statement by counsel as to what he proposed to show by witness not prejudicial.*In an action for damages for breach of a contract to deliver lumber sold to plaintiff, a statement by counsel for the plaintiff on asking a question of a witness that he proposed to show by the witness that a certain person connected with the defendants admitted the value of the lumber was more than the contract price, *held*not prejudicial error where objections were sustained to the questions and offer.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit No. 23.4



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-74501 on Form S-3 and Registration Statements
No. 33-91890, 33-18996, 33-18997, 33-65768 and 333-79093 on Form S-8 of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Worthington Armstrong Venture as of
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, partners equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the December 31, 2005
annual report on Form 10-K of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ KPMG LLP              
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|February 23, 2006
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0195 - Transition Plan for the Regulation of Certain Byproduct Materials Mandated by the Energy Policy Act of 2005

Accession Number: ML060180329

Date Released: Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML062080747 - SECY-06-0195 - TRANSITION PLAN FOR THE REGULATION OF CERTAIN  BYPRODUCT MATERIALS MANDATED BY THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF 2005 (10 page(s), 9/11/2006)
    - ML062090165 - SECY-06-0195 - Enclosure 1 - Energy Policy Act Text Applicable to the Transition Plan (1 page(s), 9/11/2006)
    - ML062080748 - SECY-06-0195 - Enclosure 2 - A Plan for the Transition of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct Material (18 page(s), 9/11/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-102 August 15, 2006

NRC ANNOUNCES NEW HEAD OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has appointed Cynthia A. Carpenter as Director of the

agency’s Office of Enforcement. She will succeed Michael Johnson, who is now the Assistant for

Operations in the Executive Director’s Office. The appointment is effective Sept. 3. In this position,

she will be responsible for managing the programs that develop and implement the policies and

programs that enforce NRC requirements. She will also oversee the agency's allegations management

program, NRC allegations review process and external safety culture policy.

Carpenter joined the NRC in 1987 as a reactor engineer in the agency’s Region I, in King of

Prussia, Pa. Since that time, she has held a number of progressively more responsible positions

including resident inspector at the formerly operating Yankee Rowe Nuclear Station and the Pilgrim

Nuclear Power Plant, both located in Massachusetts. She also worked as an operations engineer and

technical assistant. Since 1998, Carpenter has held a number of senior management positions in the

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation including program director for the Policy and Rulemaking

Program; chief of the Inspection Program Branch and deputy director of the Division of Inspection

Program Management. She became director of the Program Management, Policy Development and

Planning Staff in 2004.

Prior to joining the NRC, Carpenter worked for the Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory at the

Naval Reactors Facility in Idaho Falls, Idaho, and in the Nuclear Engineering departments at

Charleston and Puget Sound Naval Shipyards as a shift refueling engineer and nuclear engineer.

Carpenter received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh.

###
§ 3601.107 Waiver. ( a ) The DoD General Counsel may waive any provision of this part based upon a determination that the waiver is not inconsistent with 5 CFR part 2635 or otherwise prohibited by law, and that waiver of the provision will not undermine public confidence in the integrity of Government programs or operations. The waiver must be: ( 1 ) In writing;
( 2 ) Supported by a detailed statement of facts and findings; and
( 3 ) Narrow in scope and limited in duration.
( b ) The DoD General Counsel may withdraw the waiver, in writing, if it is determined to no longer be necessary.
( c ) The authority for granting and withdrawing a waiver cannot be delegated below the DoD Alternate DAEO.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 14, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00493

- CV

Industrial Product Formulators of America, Inc., Appellant

v.

Rockford Business Interiors, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on July 22, 2014

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error in the

district court’s order . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the district court’s order

. The appellant shall

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
#### Ebsary Fireproofing and Gypsum Block Company, Appellant, v. B. F. Sturtevant Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 575.503 Who may approve the payment of an extended assignment incentive?

An authorized agency official must review and approve the offer of an extended assignment incentive for an employee, including the amount of such incentive. The authorized agency official must be at a higher level than the official who made the initial decision to offer an extended assignment incentive, unless there is no official at a higher level in the agency.
Editorial Note on Subpart B of Part 591
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart B of part 591 appear at 70 FR 31313, May 31, 2005.

§ 591.231 Which areas are post differential areas? OPM has established the following post differential areas: ( a ) American Samoa as defined in § 591.205,
( b ) Territory of Guam,
( c ) Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
( d ) Johnston Atoll (including Sand Island),
( e ) Midway Atoll, and
( f ) Wake Atoll.
§ 550.181 Coverage. ( a ) Each employee meeting the definition of *criminal investigator* in § 550.103, and fulfilling the conditions and requirements of 5 U.S.C. 5545a and §§ 550.181 through 550.186, must receive availability pay to compensate the criminal investigator for unscheduled duty in excess of the 40-hour workweek based on the needs of the employing agency, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Any Office of Inspector General that employs fewer than five criminal investigators may elect not to cover such criminal investigators under the availability pay provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5545a.
[64 FR 4520, Jan. 29, 1999]
---

Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Oromin Explorations Ltd. (the Company) for the year ended February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:



1.  The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 28, 2009



(signed):     Ian Brown



Ian Brown

Chief Financial Officer







---