alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JUN 4 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________ DAVID L. BUIST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. KATHY CARTWRIGHT; KEN BINGHAM; DUANE JOHNSON; JANET SORENSON; STEVEN YATES; DAVID OKIE; and TAMARA ROBINETTE,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-4007 (D. C. No. 98-CV-29-C) (D. Utah)

_______________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

______________________________ BeforeTACHA , McKAY , and MURPHY ,Circuit Judges.

_______________________________
After examining Plaintiff-Appellant’s brief and app ellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument wouldnot materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G).-2-

The case is therefore ordered submitted without ora l argument. Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff, a state prisoner, bro ught an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking damages for six alleged cl aims of constitutional violations. Read liberally, they are: 1. Denial of access to the courts by prevention of p hone calls and mail for forty-eight days. 2. Ninth Amendment claim incorporating the conduct d escribed in the access to courts claims. 3. Cruel and unusual punishment by requiring him to participate in a “confrontation group” and denial of phone access an d a tape recorder rather than hand-written lesson notes. 4. Denial of due process incorporating the behavior alleged in the claim for cruel and unusual punishment. 5. A Mirandaclaim in connection with his arrest. 6. A claim that he was denied an opportunity to file grievances apparently about the matters included in his other claims. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge who f iled a detailed Report and Recommendation stating that each claim should b e dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). T he district court reviewed the report, Plaintiff’s objections, and the complaint d e novo. It adopted the Report-3-

and Recommendation and dismissed the complaint. We have made the same review and conclude that the Report and Recommendat ion is correct. On appeal, Plaintiff also complains that the distri ct court should have permitted him to amend his complaint rather than di smiss it. We find no merit to this claim. For the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). The district court’s dismissal of the complaint and our dismissal of the appeal count as two strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Jennings v. Natrona County Detention Ctr. Med. Faci lity , F.3d , 1999 WL 248634, at *4 (10th Cir. 1999). DISMISSED. Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
§ 630.1117 Procedures for returning unused donated annual leave to emergency leave donors and leave banks. ( a ) When a disaster or emergency is terminated, any unused annual leave donated to the emergency leave transfer program must be returned by the employing agency to the emergency leave donors, and if annual leave was donated by any leave bank(s) it must be returned to the leave bank(s).
( b ) Each agency must determine the amount of annual leave to be restored to any leave bank and/or to each of the emergency leave donors who, on the date leave restoration is made, is employed in the Federal service. The amount of unused annual leave to be returned to each emergency leave donor and/or leave bank must be proportional to the amount of annual leave donated by the employee or the leave bank to the emergency leave transfer program for such disaster or emergency, and must be returned according to the procedures outlined in § 630.911(b). Any unused annual leave remaining after the distribution will be subject to forfeiture.
( c ) Annual leave donated to an emergency leave transfer program for a specific disaster or emergency may not be transferred to another emergency leave transfer program established for a different disaster or emergency.
( d ) At the election of the emergency leave donor, the employee may choose to have the agency restore unused donated annual leave by crediting the restored annual leave to the emergency leave donor's annual leave account in either the current leave year or the first pay period of the following leave year.
§ 353.106 Personnel actions during employee's absence. ( a ) An employee absent because of service in the uniformed services is to be carried on leave without pay unless the employee elects to use other leave or freely and knowingly provides written notice of intent not to return to a position of employment with the agency, in which case the employee can be separated. (Note: A separation under this provision affects only the employee's seniority while gone; it does not affect his or her restoration rights.)
( b ) An employee absent because of compensable injury may be carried on leave without pay or separated unless the employee elects to use sick or annual leave.
( c ) Agency promotion plans must provide a mechanism by which employees who are absent because of compensable injury or uniformed service can be considered for promotion. In addition, agencies have an obligation to consider employees absent on military duty for any incident or advantage of employment that they may have been entitled to had they not been absent. This is determined by: ( 1 ) Considering whether the “incident or advantage” is one generally granted to all employees in that workplace and whether it was denied solely because of absence for military service;
( 2 ) Considering whether the person absent on military duty was treated the same as if the person had remained at work; and
( 3 ) Considering whether it was reasonably certain that the benefit would have accrued to the employee but for the absence for military service.
[60 FR 45652, Sept. 1, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 31487, June 11, 1999]
DARLINGTON COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth all subsidiaries of the registrant,  the state or
other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each, and the names under
which such subsidiaries do business as of December 31, 2003. The common stock of
each of these  subsidiaries  is 100 percent  owned by its parent.  The financial
statements of all subsidiaries  are included in the  consolidated  statements of
Darlington County Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiary.

Darlington County Bank, wholly owned subsidiary of Darlington County Bancshares,
Inc., South Carolina
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Vincent J. Connolly, as Executor of Thomas A. Connolly, Deceased. Vincent J. Connolly, Individually and as Executor of Thomas A. Connolly, Deceased, et al., Appellants; The People of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, insofar as it adjudged that the testator by the third paragraph of his will made an absolute bequest of his entire estate to his wife and that upon her death, which occurred after the testator’s death, such estate passed to her next of kin. Decree, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No. opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ.
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency 

for the District of Columbia

 

Distribution of District of Columbia Inmates * 

housed in a BOP facility 

by State and Gender 

 

• On September 29, 2006, 

there were 6,681 inmates

being housed in a facility

managed by the Federal 

Bureau of Prisons (BOP) 

following adjudication 

in DC Superior Court. 

The states with the 

highest population of 

DC offenders were 

North Carolina (1,176) 

Pennsylvania (1,165), 

and West Virginia (855). 

• Ninety-five percent 

(6,377) were males. The 

leading three states 

housing male inmates 

were North Carolina 

(1,176), Pennsylvania 

(1,127) and West

Virginia (811). 

• Five percent (304) were 

females. The leading 

three states housing 

female inmates were 

Connecticut (129), West

Virginia (44) and 

Pennsylvania (38). 

NOTE: This fact sheet 

does not include 419 

inmates who were 

in-transit to or from a 

BOP facility. 

Office of Research 

and Evaluation 

Calvin C. Johnson, Ph.D. 

Director 

 

Prepared By: 

 Michelle Pelzer 

 Program Analyst 

FACT SHEET

* Adjudicated in DC Superior Court 

Note: States represented with gray hashes do not

have BOP facilities.

 OCTOBER 2006
.

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Mar 15, 2007 15:37

PAPER NUMBER:

ACTION OFFICE:

LTR-07-0179

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 03/15/2007

EDO

DEDMRS

DEDR

DEDIA

AO9,11(

AUTHOR:

AFFILIATION:

ADDRESSEE:

SUBJECT:

ACTION:

DISTRIBUTION:

LETTER DATE:

ACKNOWLEDGED

SPECIAL HANDLING:

GOV Chester Culver

IA-GOV

CHRM Dale Klein

Section 65 l(e) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005

Appropriate

RF

03/12/2007

No

Made publicly available in ADAMS via EDO/DCP

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
A

CHESTER J. CULVER OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR PATTY JUDGE

GOVERNOR LT. GOVERNOp

March 12, 2007

The Honorable Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., Chairman

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

Dear Dr. Klein:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with the provisions of Section 651(e) of the Energy

Policy Act of 2005, regarding the licensing of certain naturally occurring and accelerator

produced radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material in Sections 11e.(3)

and 1 le.(4) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

In 1986, the State of Iowa entered into an Agreement with the Commission under

Section 274b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Under that Agreement,

the State licenses byproduct material as defined in Section 11e.(1) of the Atomic Energy

Act. In addition, the State licenses the naturally occurring and accelerator produced

radioactive materials now defined as byproduct material.

Our program for licensing the new byproduct material is not separate and distinct from

the program for licensing 1 le.(1) byproduct material, and no changes have been made

to the licensing program that would impact the previous IMPEP finding of adequacy.

Further, we intend to continue to license the new byproduct material under this same

program.

Accordingly, I certify to the Commission that the State of Iowa has a program for

licensing byproduct material, as defined in paragraph (3) or (4) of Section 11e. of the

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, that is adequate to protect the public health

and safety, and that the State intends to continue to implement our regulatory

responsibility with respect to the byproduct material.

This certification is effective on the date of publication of the NRC's "Plan for the

Transition of Regulatory Authority Resulting from the Expanded Definition of Byproduct

Material."

Sincerely,

Chester J. Culver

Governor

cc: Mary Jones. BSEMS, PS, Interim Director, Iowa Department of Public Health

Janet Schlueter. Director, Division of Materials Safety and State Agreements

STATE CAPITOL DES MOINES, IOWA 50319 515.281,521 1 FAX 515.281.6611 WWWGOVERNOR.STATE,IA.US
#### § 531.245 Computing locality rates and special rates for GM employees.

Locality rates and special rates are computed for GM employees in the same manner as locality rates and special rates for other GS employees. The applicable locality payment or special rate supplement is added on top of the GM employee's GS rate.
#### § 610.408 Use of credit hours.

Members of the Senior Executive Service (SES) may not accumulate credit hours under an alternative work schedule. Any credit hours accumulated in the SES prior to December 1, 1993, must be used within 6 months of that date.

[58 FR 58262, Nov. 1, 1993]
#### W. N. Hallock Company, Inc., Appellant, v. George Kirst, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the attachment reinstated. Ho opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Sanitized Version

of 

K1 Structure
# L_2016211EN.01003701.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/37

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 97/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1280]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/249 of 10 February 2015 extending the validity of Decision 2006/502/EC requiring Member States to take measures to ensure that only lighters which are child-resistant are placed on the market and to prohibit the placing on the market of novelty lighters (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/249 of 10 February 2015 extending the validity of Decision 2006/502/EC requiring Member States to take measures to ensure that only lighters which are child-resistant are placed on the market and to prohibit the placing on the market of novelty lighters (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 3k (Commission Decision 2006/502/EC) of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32015 D 0249: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/249 of 10 February 2015 (OJ L 41, 17.2.2015, p. 41).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32015 D 0249: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/249 of 10 February 2015 (OJ L 41, 17.2.2015, p. 41).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/249 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 41, 17.2.2015, p. 41.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### § 6601.101 General.

In accordance with 5 CFR part 2635.105, the regulations of this part apply to employees of the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. In addition to the regulations in 5 CFR part 2635 and this part, employees of the NEH are subject to the executive branch employee responsibilities and conduct regulations at 5 CFR part 735, the executive branch financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634, and the executive branch financial interests regulations at 5 CFR part 2640.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2003D-0383]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Recommended Glossary and Educational Outreach to Support Use of Symbols on Labels and in Labeling of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Intended for Professional Use” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 5, 2004 (69 FR 47448), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0553.  The approval expires on October 31, 2007.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

      ( print page 64073)    
Dated: October 27, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-24447 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
# L_2017025EN.01003602.xml

| 31.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/36

---

Corrigendum to Decision No 1/2016 of the Joint Committee on Agriculture of 16 November 2016 on amending Annex 10 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on trade in agricultural products [2017/51]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 7 of 12 January 2017
  )

On page 21, signatories:

for:

‘Krisztina BENDE’,

read:

‘Josef RENGGLI’.

---
exv10w52



 






RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003




Exhibit 10.52




Weldon H. Latham

2099 Pennsylvania Ave.

Suite 100

Washington, DC 20006 USA


Dear Weldon:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Weldon H. Latham
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: June 12, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 10,000

Vesting Schedule: 100% after 1 Year


10,000 on 06/12/2004



By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Weldon H. Latham

	 	Date: ________________
	                     Weldon H. Latham
	 	 






Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
No. 07-034 

Contact: Victor Dricks 

Phone: 817-860-8128 

 

 September 10, 2007 

 E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

ELMO COLLINS NAMED ADMINISTRATOR OF 

NRC’S REGION IV OFFICE 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has named Elmo E. 

Collins, Jr., as the new Administrator of its Region IV office in 

Arlington, Texas. 

 As Regional Administrator, Collins will oversee a staff of 202 

employees. Region IV is responsible for regulating 14 commercial 

nuclear power plants in 22 western states as well as users of nuclear 

materials in seven states and overseeing agreements with 15 other 

states. 

 He succeeds Bruce S. Mallett, who has been named Deputy 

Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs in the Office of the Executive 

Director for Operations at NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

 Collins, a native Oklahoman, graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1976. He 

served six years as a nuclear-trained submarine officer with assignments on the USS Thomas A. 

Edison and the Naval Recruiting Command. He worked in the commercial nuclear industry from 

1983 to 1987 as a startup engineer for General Electric. 

 He joined the NRC’s Region I office in 1987 as a Resident Inspector at the Oyster Creek 

nuclear plant, where he later became Senior Resident Inspector. In 1991, he transferred to Region 

IV where he served in a number of progressively more responsible positions, including Senior 

Project Engineer; Inspection Team Leader; Senior Reactor Analyst; Branch Chief in the Division 

of Reactor Projects; and Branch Chief in the Division of Nuclear Materials Safety. 

 In 2000, Collins was selected for the Senior Executive Service and held positions of 

Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects and Director, Division of Nuclear Materials 

Safety. 

 He transferred to NRC headquarters, in 2004, where he served as Deputy Director, 

Licensing and Inspection Directorate, Division of High-Level Waste Repository Safety. In 2006, 

he was appointed Director, Division of Inspection and Regional Support, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation. 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400 

Arlington, TX 76011-4005 
 ### 

 NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE 

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
From: "Cassidy Mike" <MICHAEL.CASSIDY@kohler.com> 

To: Jeff Telander/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/15/2010 08:44 AM 

Subject: Replacement Pages for Spartanburg Report 

Attachments: img-Y150745-0001.pdf

Jeff, 

There was a slight miscalculation for one source in the Spartanburg, SC test report previously submitted 

to you on CD. Please use the attached pages to replace the pages with the miscalculations in the 

original report. Contact me if any questions. 

Also, the test report for the Brownwood TX facility is complete and I've mailed to you today the CD with 

the test report. ARI is still working to submit the data via the ERT. 

Michael J. Cassidy 

EHS Specialist 

Kohler Co. 

444 Highland Drive 

Mail Stop 009 

Kohler, WI 53044 

p. (920) 457-4441, x 77263 

f. (920) 459-1682 

mike.cassidy@kohler.com 

Save money. Save water. Support Habitat for Humanity. Visit 

www.SaveWaterAmerica.com