alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ROBERT MATAVA ELDER ABUSE PROSECUTION ACT OF 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case No. 20-23230-CIV-CANNON/OTAZO-REYES

ANGELA MILNER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

TERI GALARDI, 

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ASTRIDE E. GABBE, ESQ. TO 

WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS AMEERA BREWER, TIFFANY 

THOMPSON, AND RASHEEDAH MAYS

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon counsel Astrid E. Gabbe, Esq.’s (“Attorney 

Gabbe”) Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel of Record (“Motion to Withdraw”) [D.E. 185]. 

Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 

 The Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Attorney Gabbe is permitted to withdraw 

as counsel of record for Ameera Brewer (“Brewer”), Tiffany Thompson 

(“Thompson”), and Rasheedah Mays (“Mays”), effective immediately.

 Brewer, Thompson, and Mays shall have 30 days from the date of this order to have 

new counsel enter an appearance or they will be deemed to be proceeding pro se.

 Attorney Gabbe shall immediately provide a copy of this order to Brewer, 

Thompson, and Mays and file a certificate of service.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 26th day of May, 2022.

___________________________________

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:20-cv-23230-AMC Document 194 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2022 Page 1 of 2
2

cc: United States District Judge Aileen M. Cannon 

Counsel of Record

Case 1:20-cv-23230-AMC Document 194 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2022 Page 2 of 2
§ 185.123 Exchange of witness lists, statements and exhibits. ( a ) At least 15 days before the hearing or at such other time as may be ordered by the ALJ, the parties shall exchange witness lists, copies of prior statements of proposed witnesses, and copies of proposed hearing exhibits, including copies of any written statements that the party intends to offer in lieu of live testimony in accordance with § 185.133(b). At the time the above documents are exchanged, any party that intends to rely on the transcript or deposition testimony in lieu of live testimony at the hearing, if permitted by the ALJ, shall provide each party with a copy of the specific pages of the transcript it intends to introduce into evidence.
( b ) If a party objects, the ALJ may not admit into evidence the testimony of any witness whose name does not appear on the witness list or any exhibit not provided to the opposing party as provided above unless the ALJ finds good cause for the failure or that there is no prejudice to the objecting party.
( c ) Unless another party objects within the time set by the ALJ, documents exchanged in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed to be authentic for the purpose of admissibility at the hearing.
### §7302. Definitions

In this chapter—

(1) "block grant amounts" means amounts received for a program that—

(A) directly allocates amounts to States only, except for amounts allocated for use by the agency administering the program; and

(B) provides that the State may use any part of the amounts at its discretion to continue to support activities financed on August 12, 1981, under programs whose authorizations were discontinued by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Public Law 97–35, 95 Stat. 357) and that were financed on August 12, 1981, by allocations by the United States Government to local governments or other eligible entities, or both local governments and other eligible entities.

(2) "State" includes the District of Columbia and territories and possessions of the United States.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1040.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7302 | 31:1243(note). | Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, §1741(b), 95 Stat. 763. |

In clause (1)(A), the word "Federal" is omitted as surplus because of section 101 of the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, referred to in par. (1)(B), is Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 357. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2010 (the Report), I,
Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


February 26, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 1:20-cv-22540-CMA

DOUG LONGHINI,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUNSHINE GASOLINE DISTRIBUTORS, 

INC. and SOUTH MIAMI CONVENIENCE 

STORE, INC.,

Defendants.

______________________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, DOUG LONGHINI, and Defendants, SUNSHINE GASOLINE 

DISTRIBUTORS, INC. and SOUTH MIAMI CONVENIENCE STORE, INC., having entered 

into a Confidential Settlement Agreement that resolves all claims that were or could have been 

brought in this action, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party 

shall bear its respective fees and costs. 

 Respectfully submitted this 29th day of September 2020.

/s/ Anthony J. Perez 

ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Florida Bar No.: 535451

GARCIA-MENOCAL & PEREZ, P.L.

4937 S.W. 74th Court, Unit #3

Miami, Florida 33155

Telephone: (305) 553- 3464

Facsimile: (305)553-3031

Email: ajperezlaw@gmail.com 

Florida Bar No.: 535451

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Edward S. Polk

EDWARD S. POLK

Florida Bar No.: 239860

MARC A. RAPAPORT

Florida Bar No.: 1008359

COLE, SCOTT & KISSANE, P.A.

9150 S. Dadeland Boulevard, 14th Floor

Miami, Florida 33256

Telephone: (305) 350-5338

Primary Email: edward.polk@csklegal.com;

Marc.rapaport@cslklegal.com

Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:20-cv-22540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 29th, 2020 I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court and counsel of record using CM/ECF.

GARCIA-MENOCAL, & PEREZ, P.L.

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

4937 SW 74th Court, No. 3

Miami, FL 33155

Telephone: (305) 553-3464

Facsimile: (305) 553-3031

Primary E-Mail: ajperez@lawgmp.com

Secondary Email: aquezada@lawgmp.com

crodriguez@lawgmp.com

By: /s/ Anthony J. Perez __

 ANTHONY J. PEREZ

Case 1:20-cv-22540-CMA Document 22 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/29/2020 Page 2 of 2
### §4217. United States release from liability

The United States shall not be liable for any debts, defaults, acts, or omissions of the Foundation nor shall the full faith and credit of the United States extend to any obligation of the Foundation.

(Pub. L. 116–224, title I, §117, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1080.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SCOTT SCARLOTTA MEINZER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 18 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of June, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 295.201 General prohibition.

No employee may produce official records and information or provide any testimony relating to official information in response to a demand or request without the prior, written approval of the General Counsel.
EXHIBIT 10.15  


EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

between Jerry A. Cooper ("Executive") and

Pogo Producing Company, a Delaware corporation ("Company"),

dated effective February 1, 2003  


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company are parties to an "Executive Employment Agreement" bearing an original "Effective
Date" of February 1, 2003; and 


        WHEREAS, February 1, 2004, (even date herewith) is hereby deemed to be the "Renewal Date" in that Executive Employment Agreement;
and 


        WHEREAS, Executive and Company each wish to extend said Executive Employment Agreement for an additional one-year period so as
to terminate (unless further extended) two years thereafter, (to-wit February 1, 2006); and 



        WHEREAS, Company desires to retain the services of Executive for the benefit of Company and its shareholders, and desires to induce
Executive to remain in its employ for that extended time period; and 


        WHEREAS, Executive has agreed to continue to serve as an employee of Company for the period specified herein from and after the date of
this Extension Agreement; and 


        WHEREAS, Company and Executive desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to formally secure for Company the benefit of the
experience and abilities of Executive, and to set forth the agreements and understandings of Company and Executive; and 


        WHEREAS, Company has advised Executive that execution and performance of this Extension Agreement by Company has been duly authorized and
approved by all requisite corporate action on the part of the Company. 


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, and in consideration of the sum
of $10 paid by Company to Executive, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Executive, Executive and Company do hereby agree as follows: 


        1.     The
Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company bearing an "Effective Date" of February 1, 2003 and a "Renewal Date" which is deemed herein to be
February 1, 2004, is hereby extended for an additional one-year period commencing February 1, 2005 and ending January 31, 2006, unless such employment period is
hereafter further extended for an additional period by both Executive and Company. 



        2.     All
provisions of the Executive Employment Agreement between Executive and Company dated as of February 1, 2003, and as it is herein amended, are continued in full
force and effect 








without
change as if the Executive Employment Agreement had been initially effective as of February 1, 2004. 



	 	 	POGO PRODUCING COMPANY
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/S/ JOHN O. McCOY, JR.
 John O. McCoy, Jr.

Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	

ATTEST:	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/S/ JOE ANN KINGDON
 Assistant Corporate Secretary	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

 	
 	

EMPLOYEE:
	

 	
 	

/S/ JERRY A. COOPER
 Jerry A. Cooper

Executive Vice President and Regional Manager—Western U.S.
§ 4.32 Vessels in distress; landing of cargo. ( a ) When a vessel from a foreign port arrives in distress at a port other than that to which it is destined, a permit to land merchandise or baggage may be issued if such action is necessary. Merchandise and baggage so unladen shall be taken into Customs custody and, if it has not been transported in violation of the coastwise laws, may be entered and disposed of in the same manner as any other imported merchandise or may be reladen without entry to be carried to its destination on the vessel from which it was unladen, subject only to charges for storage and safekeeping.
( b ) A bond on Customs Form 301, containing the bond conditions set forth in § 113.64 of this chapter relating to international carriers shall be given in an amount to be determined by the port director to insure the proper disposition of the cargo, whether such cargo be dutiable or free.
[28 FR 14596, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41164, Oct. 19, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
                    RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of Ambient Corporation, (the
"Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/ A for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's 2004 fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting. July 11, 2005


                  /S/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                  JOHN J. JOYCE
                  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P. Akins, Chief
Executive Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Registrant), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 5th day of November, 2009.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ ROBERT P. AKINS    
|Robert P. Akins,       
|Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
§ 351.606 Mandatory exceptions. ( a ) *Armed Forces restoration rights.* When an agency applies § 351.601 or § 351.605, it shall give retention priorities over other employees in the same subgroup to each group I or II employee entitled under 38 U.S.C. 2021 or 2024 to retention for, as applicable, 6 months or 1 year after restoration, as provided in part 353 of this chapter.
( b ) *Use of annual leave to reach initial eligibility for retirement or continuance of health benefits.* ( 1 ) An agency shall make a temporary exception under this section to retain an employee who is being involuntarily separated under this part, and who elects to use annual leave to remain on the agency's rolls after the effective date the employee would otherwise have been separated by reduction in force, in order to establish initial eligibility for immediate retirement under 5 U.S.C. 8336, 8412, or 8414, and/or to establish initial eligibility under 5 U.S.C. 8905 to continue health benefits coverage into retirement.
( 2 ) An agency shall make a temporary exception under this section to retain an employee who is being involuntarily separated under authority of part 752 of this chapter because of the employee's decision to decline relocation (including transfer of function), and who elects to use annual leave to remain on the agency's rolls after the effective date the employee would otherwise have been separated by adverse action, in order to establish initial eligibility for immediate retirement under 5 U.S.C. 8336, 8412, or 8414, and/or to establish initial eligibility under 5 U.S.C. 8905 to continue health benefits coverage into retirement.
( 3 ) An employee retained under paragraph (b) by this section must be covered by chapter 63 of title 5, United States Code.
( 4 ) An agency may not retain an employee under paragraph (b) of this section past the date that the employee first becomes eligible for immediate retirement, or for continuation of health benefits into retirement, except that an employee may be retained long enough to satisfy both retirement and health benefits requirements.
( 5 ) Except as permitted by 5 CFR 351.608(d), an agency may not approve an employee's use of any other type of leave after the employee has been retained under a temporary exception authorized by paragraph (b) of this section.
( 6 ) Annual leave for purposes of paragraph (b) of this section is described in § 630.212 of this chapter.
( c ) *Documentation.* Each agency shall record on the retention register, for inspection by each employee, the reasons for any deviation from the order of release required by § 351.601 or § 351.605.
[62 FR 10682, Mar. 10, 1997]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernest Melvin, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Milton Melvin, Appellant.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, convicting them of robbery in the second degree and from the sentence imposed. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered. It was error to admit the testimony of the witness Detective Pilón respecting the complaining witness’ identification of appellants prior to the trial. *(People*V. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471.) Under the proof and in the circumstances disclosed by the record, it was error to read to the jury the entire affidavit made in the Magistrate’s Court and the entire transcript of the testimony of the complaining witness before the Grand Jury, and the error was not adequately corrected by the Trial Judge’s instructions. No separate appeal lies from the sentence which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE S TATE OF NEW YORK



## Ap p e lla te Div isio n , Fo urth J ud i c i a l De p a rtm e n t

255 CA 15-00588 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MAUREEN BOSCO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OF CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT OF AWET G., A PATIENT AT CENTRAL NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, CONSECUTIVE NO. 595912, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

EMMETT J. CREAHAN, DIRECTOR, MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, UTICA (MICHAEL H. MCCORMICK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATHLEEN M. TREASURE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered March 17, 2015. The order granted the petition seeking authorization to administer medication to respondent over his objection.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order granting the petition seeking authorization to administer medication to respondent over his objection. Respondent contends that the order authorizing medication over objection was improperly granted pursuant to 14 NYCRR 527.8 inasmuch as he had been voluntarily taking his medications prior to the hearing. We agree that Supreme Court erred in granting the order inasmuch as the record establishes that respondent withdrew his objection to the treatment approximately two months before the petition was filed ( see 14 NYCRR 527.8 [c] [6]; s ee also 14 NYCRR 527.8 [c] [5] [ii] [b] [3]; see generally Matter of Jay S. [Barber] , 118 AD3d 803, 805).

F rances E. Cafarell

Entered: March 25, 2016 C lerk of the Court
### §701c–2. Acquisition and sale of land

The provisions of sections 593 to 595 of this title relating to river and harbor improvements are made applicable to works of flood control heretofore or hereafter authorized.

(Aug. 18, 1941, ch. 377, §6, 55 Stat. 650; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §3(6), 65 Stat. 708.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, struck out "558a and" in the reference to other sections.