alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Waterworks, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 26, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mechelle Slaughter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to our knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Mechelle Slaughter
Mechelle SlaughterChief Financial OfficerMay 5, 2004
 A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
National Waterworks, Inc. and will be retained by National Waterworks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request. 21
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-005 February 20, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION AT LASALLE NUCLEAR PLANT FOLLOWING

CONTROL ROD PROBLEM DURING AUTOMATIC REACTOR SHUTDOWN

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct a special inspection at the LaSalle Nuclear

Power Station at Seneca, Illinois, following a problem with control rod instrumentation during an

automatic shutdown of the Unit 1 reactor. The LaSalle plant near Seneca, Ill, is operated by Exelon

Generation Co. and has two 1,197-megawatt reactors.

The utility declared a Site Area Emergency at the plant early Monday when reactor

instrumentation showed that three control rods failed to insert fully into the reactor core during an

automatic reactor shutdown. The plant was at 6 percent power when the automatic shutdown occurred.

Subsequently, the reactor instrumentation showed the plant was fully shut down. The plant

staff verified that all control rods were fully inserted except for one for which the position indication

remained indeterminate. The reactor has 185 control rods which control power and insert into the

reactor core to shut down the reactor.

All plant safety systems functioned normally with the exception of the control rod position

indications, and there was no release of radioactivity associated with the event. The reactor remained

in a stable condition.

After verifying plant conditions, the utility terminated the Site Area Emergency Classification

at 4:27 a.m. CST. A Site Area Emergency is the second highest of the four emergency categories in

the NRC’s emergency response system. The emergency was declared because of the uncertainty

caused by the instrumentation problems for the three control rods.

The NRC’s two resident inspectors responded to the plant and the agency staffed its emergency

response facilities in its Region III office in Lisle, Ill., and its Headquarters in Rockville, Md., to

monitor the situation at the LaSalle plant.

At the time of the incident, the plant was shutting down for a refueling outage. Preliminary

information showed that the automatic reactor shutdown was caused by a malfunction of the plant’s

turbine control system.
The NRC inspectors will review the circumstances surrounding the shutdown, including the

control rod indication problems. A written report of the special inspection will be issued about 30 days

following the completion of the inspection. It will be available on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/listofrpts_body.html#lasa 

# # # # #
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Max W. Federbush, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ.; Peck, P. J., and Callahan, J., dissent and vote to affirm.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-98-61 December 30, 1998

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Greenman 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON PROPOSAL TO TERMINATE

LICENSE OF SHELWELL SERVICES, INC., HEBRON, OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public

meeting on January 13 on the request by Shelwell Services, Inc.,

to terminate its NRC license. The Shelwell facility is located

at 645 East Main Street, Hebron, Ohio.

The meeting will start at 7 p.m. at the Holiday Inn,

733 Hebron Road, in Heath, Ohio.

The NRC staff will discuss the license termination process,

present an update on its reviews and inspections of the company,

receive comments from members of the public, and respond to

questions.

Shelwell is licensed by the NRC to use radioactive material

in well-logging and tracer studies of oil and gas wells. In

January of this year, the company asked the NRC to terminate its

license, as it will no longer be using radioactive material in

its business.

NRC inspectors in November conducted radiological surveys at

Shelwell along with an NRC contractor, Oak Ridge Institute for

Science and Education. The special inspection was observed by a

representative from the Ohio Department of Health. Results from

the inspection will be discussed at the meeting.

A small volume of contaminated soil and nine sealed

radiation sources stored at the facility will need to be removed

prior to NRC terminating the company’s license. After removal of

the waste and sources, NRC inspectors will survey the storage

building to ensure that the site is suitable for unrestricted

use.

In 1983, Shelwell accidentally drilled into a cesium-137

sealed source which caused the spread of radioactive

contamination. The company substantially decontaminated the site

following the event and recently completed additional cleanup

activities.
NRC is currently preparing an environmental assessment of

Shelwell’s license termination request and the final findings

will be published in a Federal Register notice prior to a

decision by the NRC staff.

There is an opportunity for a public hearing regarding the

company’s license termination plans. A request for a hearing up

to January 14 may be filed with the NRC Office of the Secretary

by mail or telegram addressed to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001. Attention:

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

####
Exhibit 32.2

**Certification of CFO****Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofGateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

|        |        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | a)     | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | b)     | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                    |

|                                   |        |                                                            |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                                       |
| Dated:  August 13, 2003 | By:    | /s/ RODERICK M. SHERWOOD III                               |
|                              |   |                                                            |
|                              |   | **Roderick M. Sherwood III**                               |
|                              |   | **Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer** |

         A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §631. Transfer of property between projects

The Secretary of the Army may direct a temporary transfer of any property employed in the improvement of rivers and harbors whenever, in his judgment, such transfer would secure efficient or economical results, and such adjustment in the way of charges and credits shall be made between the projects affected as may be equitable.

(June 13, 1902, ch. 1079, §5, 32 Stat. 373; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from part of section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1902.

The omitted part of that section is set out as section 558 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-022 May 17, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR RIVER BEND NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy

Operations, Inc. on May 19 to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the River Bend nuclear plant. The facility is located in St. Francisville, La.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at Grace Episcopal Church, Jackson Hall,

11621 Ferdinand Street, St. Francisville. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be

available to answer questions from the public on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the

agency’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff evaluates the performance of each of the nation’s commercial

nuclear plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallet. “This meeting gives us a chance

to discuss our assessment with the company, local officials and residents near the plant. We

want to make this information available to the public and answer any questions people may have

about the plant.”

Overall, River Bend operated safely during 2004 and will receive baseline inspections

during 2005. Baseline inspections are performed by the NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to

the plant and by inspection specialists from the Region IV office and the agency’s headquarters

in Rockville, Md. 

However, because the number of unplanned shutdowns at the plant exceeded a

performance threshold, NRC plans to conduct a supplemental inspection during 2005 in order to

verify that the company has identified the root cause of the problem and taken actions to prevent

recurrence.
A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office in Arlington, Texas, to plant officials will

serve as the basis for the meeting. It is available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/rbs_2004q4.pdf .

Current information for River Bend is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/RBS1/rbs1_chart.html .

###
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Federal, State, and Local GovernmentsState Government Tax Collections                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|  Main 				   			        Site Map 				   			        Contact Us                                                                                                                                                                       |
| The State Government Tax Collections (STC) report provides a summary of taxes collected by state for up to 25 tax categories.  These tables and data files present the details on tax collections by type of tax imposed and collected by state governments.		    |
|  Available Data                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | types and number of files vary somewhat depending upon reference year  |
| Years Available Select a Year 200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995199419931992                                                                                                                                                                             |
#### In the Matter of Tessim Zorach et al., Respondents, against Andrew G. Clauson, Jr., et al., Constituting the Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondents, and Francis T. Spaulding, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Appellant.

Stay vacated and time to answer extended until ten days after service of a copy of the order hereon. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See *post,*pp. 835, 846.]
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.705 Return to Federal employment. ( a ) *Conditions.* Reemployment rights may be exercised only under the following conditions. The individual must apply in writing to the former employing agency for reemployment not later than 30 calendar days after: ( 1 ) Receipt of notice of involuntary separation from tribal employment. For this purpose, involuntary separation means any separation against the will and without consent of the individual.
( 2 ) Reversion of the function to Federal operation, whether reversion is through tribal or Federal action; or
( 3 ) Separation with the joint consent of the tribal organization and the Federal agency for reasons of personal hardship or other special circumstances.
( b ) *Termination.* A former employee's entitlement to reemployment terminates for: ( 1 ) Failure to apply for reemployment within the time limit stated in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Resignation from tribal service without the joint consent, described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, of the tribal organization and the Federal employer; or
( 3 ) Failure to accept, within 10 calendar days of receipt thereof, an offer of reemployment made under § 352.706 which is determined by the employing agency or by the Merit Systems Protection Board on appeal to be a proper offer of reemployment.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CRAIG SENTELL BARTEE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1193

[ July 3, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Dan L. Vaughn

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312011CF000377A

.

Craig Sentell Bartee, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Merrimack,

Dec., 1897.

#### State *v.*Cox.

On the trial of an indictment for a second offence of illegally keeping malt liquor for sale, a former conviction may be proved by the original complaint and the minutes of the clerk of court thereon, showing that the defendant pleaded guilty and was fined.

Indictment, for a second offence of illegally keeping malt liquor for sale. Verdict for the state. The alleged former conviction was before a police court; and the only record of it was the original complaint with minutes indorsed upon it by the clerk of court, showing that the defendant pleaded guilty and was fined. The complaint and minutes were received in evidence, subject to the defendant’s exception.

*George M. Fletcher,*solicitor, for the state.

*Daniel B. Donovan, Almon F. Burbank,*and *Albin, Martin Howe,*for the defendant.

Pike, J.

The original complaint and the minutes indorsed upon it contained explicit evidence of all facts required for extending the j udgment. They were the only evidence of the j udgment in existence at the time of trial. The court had authority to allow a formal record to be made from them before receiving the evidence. *Willard*v. *Harvey,*24 N. H. 344; *Ballou*v. *Smith,*
      *24729 N. H. 530. The extended record would prove the same facts with the same force that the complaint and minutes proved. The defendant would receive no benefit by the change in the form of proof.

It is held in Massachusetts under similar circumstances that the complaint and clerk’s minutes are competent evidence of the judgment. *Pruden*v. *Alden,*23 Pick. 184, 187; *Commonwealth*v. *Hatfield,*107 Mass. 227, 231; *Good*v. *French,*115 Mass. 201, 204. Similar evidence was received, apparently without objection, in *Caouette*v. *Young,*67 N. H. 159.

*Exception overruled.*

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §2264. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title III, §360(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2732

Section, Pub. L. 99–662, title VII, §710, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4160; Pub. L. 106–109, §8(b), Nov. 24, 1999, 113 Stat. 1495, related to deauthorization of studies.
Exhibit32.2

|   | 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|

| 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 30, 2009 | By:      /s/ Fred T.      Grant, Jr. |   |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|

|   | Fred      T. Grant, Jr.                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
§ 1201.122 Filing complaint; serving documents on parties. ( a ) *Place of filing.* A Special Counsel complaint seeking disciplinary action under 5 U.S.C. 1215(a)(1) (including a complaint alleging a violation of the Hatch Political Activities Act) must be filed with the Clerk of the Board.
( b ) *Initial filing and service.* The Special Counsel must file a copy of the complaint, together with numbered and tabbed exhibits or attachments, if any, and a certificate of service listing each party or the party's representative. The certificate of service must show the last known address, telephone number, and facsimile number of each party or representative. The Special Counsel must serve a copy of the complaint on each party and the party's representative, as shown on the certificate of service.
( c ) *Subsequent filings and service.* Each party must serve on every other party or the party's representative one copy of each of its pleadings, as defined by § 1201.4(b). A certificate of service describing how and when service was made must accompany each pleading. Each party is responsible for notifying the Board and the other parties in writing of any change in name, address, telephone number, or facsimile number of the party or the party's representative.
[62 FR 48451, Sept. 16, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 59863, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57630, Sept. 27, 2004; 77 FR 62370, Oct. 12, 2012]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-034 May 24, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION OF PUMP FAILURE AT PERRY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection to review the

circumstances surrounding a failure of a pump which provides cooling water to various safety systems

at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The plant, located in Perry, Ohio, is operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear

Operating Company.

The pump in the emergency service water system failed during testing on Friday, May 21. 

Plant personnel shut the plant down on Saturday to investigate the cause of the pump failure and to

make necessary repairs.

The pump is one of three in the emergency service water system. At the time of the failure, the

other pumps were available to provide cooling to plant equipment if needed. 

A similar failure of this pump occurred during testing on September 1 of last year. That

problem was attributed to improper reassembly of the pump following maintenance in 1997.

The NRC had started a broad team inspection on May 17 to review that September 1 pump

failure along with two other equipment problems which have occurred at Perry over the past 18

months. These equipment problems were determined to be of low to moderate safety significance --

“white” inspection findings in the NRC classification of problems which ranges from “green,” for

findings of minor safety significance, through “white,” “yellow,” and “red,” indicating increasing

safety significance.

The May 17 inspection team has concluded the first week of its inspection and plans to return

June 7 for a second week of inspection.

The special inspection looking at the May 21 failure is separate from the broader team

inspection, although both involve the NRC’s resident inspector at Perry.

The reports of both the special inspection and the broader equipment inspection will be publicly

available about a month following the completion of the inspections. They may be obtained from the

Region III Office of Public Affairs or from the NRC’s online document library:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html - use docket number 05000440 to locate Perry
-2-

documents. Assistance in using the online document library is available by calling the NRC Public

Document Room at 800-397-4209.

###