# Patent

## Title
Antisense modulation of kinesin-like 1 expression

## Abstract

Antisense compounds, compositions and methods are provided for modulating the expression of kinesin-like 1. The compositions comprise antisense compounds, particularly antisense oligonucleotides, targeted to nucleic acids encoding kinesin-like 1. Methods of using these compounds for modulation of kinesin-like 1 expression and for treatment of diseases associated with expression of kinesin-like 1 are provided.

## Background
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/156,603, filed on May 23, 2002, the contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides compositions and methods for modulating the expression of kinesin-like 1. In particular, this invention relates to compounds, particularly oligonucleotides, specifically hybridizable with nucleic acids encoding kinesin-like 1. Such compounds have been shown to modulate the expression of kinesin-like 1.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The intracellular transport of proteins, lipids, and mRNA to specific locations within the cell, as well as the proper alignment and separation of chromosomes in dividing cells, is essential to the functioning of the cell. The superfamily of proteins called kinesins (KIF), along with the myosins and dyneins, function as molecular engines to bind and transport vesicles and organelles along microtubules with energy supplied by ATP. KIFs have been identified in many species ranging from yeast to humans. The amino acid sequences which comprise the motor domain are highly conserved among eukaryotic phyla, while the region outside of the motor domain serves to bind to the cargo and varies in amino acid sequence among KIFs. The movement of a kinesin along a microtubule can occur in either the plus or minus direction, but any given kinesin can only travel in one direction, an action that is mediated by the polarity of the motor and the microtubule. The KIFs have been grouped into three major types depending on the position of the motor domain: the amino-terminal domain, the middle motor domain, and the carboxyl-terminal domain, referred to respectively as N-kinesin, M-kinesin, and C-kinesins. These are further classified into 14 classes based on a phylogenetic analysis of the 45 known human and mouse kinesin genes (Miki et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2001, 98, 7004–7011).
One such kinesin, kinesin-like 1, a member of the N-2 (also called bimC) family of kinesins and is involved in separating the chromosomes by directing their movement along microtubules in the bipolar spindle. During mitosis, the microtubule bipolar spindle functions to distribute the duplicated chromosomes equally to daughter cells. Kinesin-like 1 is first phosphorylated by the kinase p34cdc2 and is essential for centrosome separation and assembly of bipolar spindles at prophase (Blangy et al., Cell, 1995, 83, 1159–1169). In rodent neurons, kinesin-like 1 is expressed well past their terminal mitotic division, and has been implicated in regulating microtubule behaviors within the developing axons and dendrites (Ferhat et al., J. Neurosci., 1998, 18, 7822–7835). The gene encoding human kinesin-like 1 (also called KNSL1, Eg5, HsEg5, HKSP, KIF11, thyroid interacting protein 5, and TRIP5) was cloned in 1995 (Blangy et al., Cell, 1995, 83, 1159–1169).
Inhibition of kinesin-like 1 has been suggested as a target for arresting cellular proliferation in cancer because of the central role kinesin-like 1 holds in mitosis. Expression of kinesin-like 1 may also contribute to other disease states. A contribution of kinesin-like 1 to B-cell leukemia has been demonstrated in mice as a result of upregulated expression of kinesin-like 1 following a retroviral insertion mutation in the proximity of the kinesin-like 1 gene (Hansen and Justice, Oncogene, 1999, 18, 6531–6539). Autoantibodies to a set of proteins in the mitotic spindle assembly have been detected in human sera and these autoantibodies have been associated with autoimmune diseases including carpal tunnel syndrome, Raynaud's phenomenon, systemic sclerosis, Sjorgren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, polymyositis, and polyarteritis. One of these autoantigens is kinesin-like 1 and has been identified in systemic lupus erythematosus (Whitehead et al., Arthritis Rheum., 1996, 39, 1635–1642).
Currently, there are no known therapeutic agents which effectively inhibit the synthesis of kinesin-like 1. The use of antibodies to kinesin-like 1 has been reported several times in the art as a method to examine the participation of kinesin-like 1 during different stages of mitosis (Blangy et al., Cell, 1995, 83, 1–159–1169.; Kapoor et al., J. Cell Biol., 2000, 150, 975–988.; Whitehead and Rattner, J. Cell Sci., 1998, 111, 2551–2561). For instance, in the presence of antibodies specific to kinesin-like 1, microtubule arrays responsible for pre- and post-mitotic centrosome movement never form, confirming the recurring role of kinesin-like 1 in establishing the microtubule arrays that form during cell division. This role may also encompass the ability of kinesin-like 1 to influence the distribution of other protein components associated with cell division (Whitehead and Rattner, J. Cell Sci., 1998, 111, 2551–2561).
The small molecule monastrol has been used in vitro as a useful and specific tool to probe the involvement of kinesin-like 1 in the mitotic process (Kapoor et al., J. Cell Biol., 2000, 150, 975–988). Like the anti-kinesin-like 1 antibodies, the small molecule monastrol produces a monoastral phenotype, as opposed to the bipolar spindle, and subsequently arrests mitosis. The formation of the monastral spindle is reversible when monastrol is washed away, and the mechanism of monastrol action is presumed to be inhibition of kinesin-like 1 (Mayer et al., Science, 1999, 286, 971–974).
Another small molecule, all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) is able to arrest growth in a number of different cell types such as melanoma, lymphoma, neuroblastoma, embryonic stem, and carcinoma cells by modulating gene expression. Kinesin-like 1 is one of these target genes and the expression of kinesin-like 1 in pancreatic carcinoma cell lines is inhibited by ATRA at the posttranscriptional level. These anti-proliferative effects arising from ATRA inhibition of kinesin-like 1 was further confirmed by the use of an antisense expression vector directed against kinesin-like 1 (Kaiser et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1999, 274, 18925–18931).
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2002/0165240, published Nov. 7, 2002 (Kimball et al.), discloses methods for treating a condition via modulation of Eg5 protein-activity comprising administering a small molecule Eg5 inhibitor.
There remains a long felt need for additional agents capable of effectively inhibiting kinesin-like 1 function.
Antisense technology is emerging as an effective means for reducing the expression of specific gene products and may therefore prove to be uniquely useful in a number of therapeutic, diagnostic, and research applications for the modulation of kinesin-like 1 expression. A small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting the mRNA of the kinesin has been used to assay for the optimization of siRNA transfection, and was found to induce mitotic arrest. D. Weil et al., 2002, BioTechniques 33:1244–1248. U.S. Pat. No. 6,472,521, issued Oct. 29, 2002 (Uhlmann et al.), discloses and claims oligonucleotides for the inhibition of human Eg5 expression. PCT Publication WO 03/030832, published Apr. 17, 2003 (Reinhard et al.), discloses use of antisense oligonucleotides that target human kinesin genes for treating diseases involving aberrant cell proliferation. The kinesin gene may be human Eg5.
The present invention provides compositions and methods for modulating kinesin-like 1 expression.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to antisense compounds, especially nucleic acid and nucleic acid-like oligomers, which are targeted to a nucleic acid encoding kinesin-like 1, and which modulate the expression of kinesin-like 1. Pharmaceutical and other compositions comprising the compounds of the invention are also provided. Further provided are methods of screening for modulators of kinesin-like 1 and methods of modulating the expression of kinesin-like 1 in cells, tissues or animals comprising contacting said cells, tissues or animals with one or more of the compounds or compositions of the invention. Methods of treating an animal, particularly a human, suspected of having or being prone to a disease or condition associated with expression of kinesin-like 1 are also set forth herein. Such methods comprise administering a therapeutically or prophylactically effective amount of one or more of the compounds or compositions of the invention to the person in need of treatment.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A. Overview of the Invention
The present invention employs antisense compounds, preferably oligonucleotides and similar species for use in modulating the function or effect of nucleic acid molecules encoding kinesin-like 1. This is accomplished by providing oligonucleotides which specifically hybridize with one or more nucleic acid molecules encoding kinesin-like 1. As used herein, the terms “target nucleic acid” and “nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1” have been used for convenience to encompass DNA encoding kinesin-like 1, RNA (including pre-mRNA and mRNA or portions thereof) transcribed from such DNA, and also cDNA derived from such RNA. The hybridization of a compound of this invention with its target nucleic acid is generally referred to as “antisense”. Consequently, the preferred mechanism believed to be included in the practice of some preferred embodiments of the invention is referred to herein as “antisense inhibition.” Such antisense inhibition is typically based upon hydrogen bonding-based hybridization of oligonucleotide strands or segments such that at least one strand or segment is cleaved, degraded, or otherwise rendered inoperable. In this regard, it is presently preferred to target specific nucleic acid molecules and their functions for such antisense inhibition.
The functions of DNA to be interfered with can include replication and transcription. Replication and transcription, for example, can be from an endogenous cellular template, a vector, a plasmid construct or otherwise. The functions of RNA to be interfered with can include functions such as translocation of the RNA to a site of protein translation, translocation of the RNA to sites within the cell which are distant from the site of RNA synthesis, translation of protein from the RNA, splicing of the RNA to yield one or more RNA species, and catalytic activity or complex formation involving the RNA which may be engaged in or facilitated by the RNA. One preferred result of such interference with target nucleic acid function is modulation of the expression of kinesin-like 1. In the context of the present invention, “modulation” and “modulation of expression” mean either an increase (stimulation) or a decrease (inhibition) in the amount or levels of a nucleic acid molecule encoding the gene, e.g., DNA or RNA. Inhibition is often the preferred form of modulation of expression and mRNA is often a preferred target nucleic acid.
In the context of this invention, “hybridization” means the pairing of complementary strands of oligomeric compounds. In the present invention, the preferred mechanism of pairing involves hydrogen bonding, which may be Watson-Crick, Hoogsteen or reversed Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding, between complementary nucleoside or nucleotide bases (nucleobases) of the strands of oligomeric compounds. For example, adenine and thymine are complementary nucleobases which pair through the formation of hydrogen bonds. Hybridization can occur under varying circumstances.
An antisense compound is specifically hybridizable when binding of the compound to the target nucleic acid interferes with the normal function of the target nucleic acid to cause a loss of activity, and there is a sufficient degree of complementarity to avoid non-specific binding of the antisense compound to non-target nucleic acid sequences under conditions in which specific binding is desired, i.e., under physiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays or therapeutic treatment, and under conditions in which assays are performed in the case of in vitro assays.
In the present invention the phrase “stringent hybridization conditions” or “stringent conditions” refers to conditions under which a compound of the invention will hybridize to its target sequence, but to a minimal number of other sequences. Stringent conditions are sequence-dependent and will be different in different circumstances and in the context of this invention, “stringent conditions” under which oligomeric compounds hybridize to a target sequence are determined by the nature and composition of the oligomeric compounds and the assays in which they are being investigated.
“Complementary,” as used herein, refers to the capacity for precise pairing between two nucleobases of an oligomeric compound. For example, if a nucleobase at a certain position of an oligonucleotide (an oligomeric compound), is capable of hydrogen bonding with a nucleobase at a certain position of a target nucleic acid, said target nucleic acid being a DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotide molecule, then the position of hydrogen bonding between the oligonucleotide and the target nucleic acid is considered to be a complementary position. The oligonucleotide and the further DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotide molecule are complementary to each other when a sufficient number of complementary positions in each molecule are occupied by nucleobases which can hydrogen bond with each other. Thus, “specifically hybridizable” and “complementary” are terms which are used to indicate a sufficient degree of precise pairing or complementarity over a sufficient number of nucleobases such that stable and specific binding occurs between the oligonucleotide and a target nucleic acid.
It is understood in the art that the sequence of an antisense compound need not be 100% complementary to that of its target nucleic acid to be specifically hybridizable. Moreover, an oligonucleotide may hybridize over one or more segments such that intervening or adjacent segments are not involved in the hybridization event (e.g., a loop structure or hairpin structure). It is preferred that the antisense compounds of the present invention comprise at least 70%, or at least 75%, or at least 80%, or at least 85% sequence complementarity to a target region within the target nucleic acid, more preferably that they comprise at least 90% sequence complementarity and even more preferably comprise at least 95% or at least 99% sequence complementarity to the target region within the target nucleic acid sequence to which they are targeted. For example, an antisense compound in which 18 of 20 nucleobases of the antisense compound are complementary to a target region, and would therefore specifically hybridize, would represent 90 percent complementarity. In this example, the remaining noncomplementary nucleobases may be clustered or interspersed with complementary nucleobases and need not be contiguous to each other or to complementary nucleobases. As such, an antisense compound which is 18 nucleobases in length having 4 (four) noncomplementary nucleobases which are flanked by two regions of complete complementarity with the target nucleic acid would have 77.8% overall complementarity with the target nucleic acid and would thus fall within the scope of the present invention. Percent complementarity of an antisense compound with a region of a target nucleic acid can be determined routinely using BLAST programs (basic local alignment search tools) and PowerBLAST programs known in the art (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403–410; Zhang and Madden, Genome Res., 1997, 7, 649–656).
Percent homology, sequence identity or complementarity, can be determined by, for example, the Gap program (Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package, Version 8 for-Unix, Genetics Computer Group, University Research Park, Madison Wis.), using default settings, which uses the algorithm of Smith and Waterman (Adv. Appl. Math., 1981, 2, 482–489). In some preferred embodiments, homology, sequence identity or complementarity, between the oligomeric and target is between about 50% to about 60%. In some embodiments, homology, sequence identity or complementarity, is between about 60% to about 70%. In preferred embodiments, homology, sequence identity or complementarity, is between about 70% and about 80%. In more preferred embodiments, homology, sequence identity or complementarity, is between about 80% and about 90%. In some preferred embodiments, homology, sequence identity or complementarity, is about 90%, about 92%, about 94%, about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99% or about 100%.
B. Compounds of the Invention
According to the present invention, antisense compounds include antisense oligomeric compounds, antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes, external guide sequence (EGS) oligonucleotides, alternate splicers, primers, probes, and other oligomeric compounds which hybridize to at least a portion of the target nucleic acid. As such, these compounds may be introduced in the form of single-stranded, double-stranded, circular or hairpin oligomeric compounds and may contain structural elements such as internal or terminal bulges or loops. Once introduced to a system, the compounds of the invention may elicit the action of one or more enzymes or structural proteins to effect modification of the target nucleic acid.
One non-limiting example of such an enzyme is RNAse H, a cellular endonuclease which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. It is known in the art that single-stranded antisense compounds which are “DNA-like” elicit RNAse H. Activation of RNase H, therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatly enhancing the efficiency of oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression. Similar roles have been postulated for other ribonucleases such as those in the RNase III and ribonuclease L family of enzymes.
While the preferred form of antisense compound is a single-stranded antisense oligonucleotide, in many species the introduction of double-stranded structures, such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules, has been shown to induce potent and specific antisense-mediated reduction of the function of a gene orbits associated gene products. This phenomenon occurs in both plants and animals and is believed to have an evolutionary connection to viral defense and transposon silencing.
The first evidence that dsRNA could lead to gene silencing in animals came in 1995 from work in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans (Guo and Kempheus, Cell, 1995, 81, 611–620). Montgomery et al. have shown that the primary interference effects of dsRNA are posttranscriptional (Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502–15507). The posttranscriptional antisense mechanism defined in Caenorhabditis elegans resulting from exposure to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) has since been designated RNA interference (RNAi). This term has been generalized to mean antisense-mediated gene silencing involving the introduction of dsRNA leading to the sequence-specific reduction of endogenous targeted mRNA levels (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806–811). Recently, it has been shown that it is, in fact, the single-stranded RNA oligomers of antisense polarity of the dsRNAs which are the potent inducers of RNAi (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694–697).
The antisense compounds of the present invention also include modified compounds in which a different base is present at one or more of the nucleotide positions in the compound. For example, if the first nucleotide is an adenosine, modified compounds may be produced which contain thymidine, guanosine or cytidine at this position. This may be done at any of the positions of the antisense compound. These compounds are then tested using the methods described herein to determine their ability to inhibit expression of kinesin-like 1 mRNA.
In the context of this invention, the term “oligomeric compound” refers to a polymer or oligomer comprising a plurality of monomeric units. In the context of this invention, the term “oligonucleotide” refers to an oligomer or polymer of ribonucleic acid (RNA) or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or mimetics, chimeras, analogs and homologs thereof. This term includes oligonucleotides composed of naturally occurring nucleobases, sugars and covalent internucleoside (backbone) linkages as well as oligonucleotides having non-naturally occurring portions which function similarly. Such modified or substituted oligonucleotides are often preferred over native forms because of desirable properties such as, for example, enhanced cellular uptake, enhanced affinity for a target nucleic acid and increased stability in the presence of nucleases.
While oligonucleotides are a preferred form of the antisense compounds of this invention, the present invention comprehends other families of antisense compounds as well, including but not limited to oligonucleotide analogs and mimetics such as those described herein.
The antisense compounds in accordance with this invention preferably comprise from about 8 to about 80 nucleobases (i.e. from about 8 to about 80 linked nucleosides). One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention embodies compounds of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, or 80 nucleobases in length.
In one preferred embodiment, the antisense compounds of the invention are 12 to 50 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies compounds of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, or 50 nucleobases in length.
In another preferred embodiment, the antisense compounds of the invention are 15 to 30 nucleobases in length. One having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that this embodies compounds of 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, or 30 nucleobases in length.
Particularly preferred compounds are oligonucleotides from about 12 to about 50 nucleobases, even more preferably those comprising from about 15 to about 30 nucleobases.
Antisense compounds 8–80 nucleobases in length comprising a stretch of at least eight (8) consecutive nucleobases selected from within the illustrative antisense compounds are considered to be suitable antisense compounds as well.
Exemplary preferred antisense compounds include oligonucleotide sequences that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 5′-terminus of one of the illustrative preferred antisense compounds (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same oligonucleotide beginning immediately upstream of the 5′-terminus of the antisense compound which is specifically hybridizable to the target nucleic acid and continuing until the oligonucleotide contains about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). Similarly preferred antisense compounds are represented by oligonucleotide sequences that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 3′-terminus of one of the illustrative preferred antisense compounds (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same oligonucleotide beginning immediately downstream of the 3′-terminus of the antisense compound which is specifically hybridizable to the target nucleic acid and continuing until the oligonucleotide contains about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). It is also understood that preferred antisense compounds may be represented by oligonucleotide sequences that comprise at least 8 consecutive nucleobases from an internal portion of the sequence of an illustrative preferred antisense compound, and may extend in either or both directions until the oligonucleotide contains about 8 to about 80 nucleobases.
One having skill in the art armed with the preferred antisense compounds illustrated herein will be able, without undue experimentation, to identify further preferred antisense compounds.
C. Targets of the Invention
“Targeting” an antisense compound to a particular nucleic acid molecule, in the context of this invention, can be a multistep process. The process usually begins with the identification of a target nucleic acid whose function is to be modulated. This target nucleic acid may be, for example, a cellular gene (or mRNA transcribed from the gene) whose expression is associated with a particular disorder or disease state, or a nucleic acid molecule from an infectious agent. In the present invention, the target nucleic acid encodes kinesin-like 1.
The targeting process usually also includes determination of at least one target region, segment, or site within the target nucleic acid for the antisense interaction to occur such that the desired effect, e.g., modulation of expression, will result. Within the context of the present invention, the term “region” is defined as a portion of the target nucleic acid having at least one identifiable structure, function, or characteristic. Within regions of target nucleic acids are segments. “Segments” are defined as smaller or sub-portions of regions within a target nucleic acid. “Sites,” as used in the present invention, are defined as positions within a target nucleic acid.
Since, as is known in the art, the translation initiation codon is typically 5′-AUG (in transcribed mRNA molecules; 5′-ATG in the corresponding DNA molecule), the translation initiation codon is also referred to as the “AUG codon,” the “start codon” or the “AUG start codon”. A minority of genes have a translation initiation codon having the RNA sequence 5′-GUG, 5′-UUG or 5′-CUG, and 5′-AUA, 5′-ACG and 5′-CUG have been shown to function in vivo. Thus, the terms “translation initiation codon” and “start codon” can encompass many codon sequences, even though the initiator amino acid in each instance is typically methionine (in eukaryotes) or formylmethionine (in prokaryotes). It is also known in the art that eukaryotic and prokaryotic genes may have two or more alternative start codons, any one of which may be preferentially utilized for translation initiation in a particular cell type or tissue, or under a particular set of conditions. In the context of the invention, “start codon” and “translation initiation codon” refer to the codon or codons that are used in vivo to initiate translation of an mRNA transcribed from a gene encoding kinesin-like 1, regardless of the sequence(s) of such codons. It is also known in the art that a translation termination codon (or “stop codon”) of a gene may have one of three sequences, i.e., 5′-UAA, 5′-UAG and 5′-UGA (the corresponding DNA sequences are 5′-TAA, 5′-TAG and 5′-TGA, respectively).
The terms “start codon region” and “translation initiation codon region” refer to a portion of such an mRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguous nucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translation initiation codon. Similarly, the terms “stop codon region” and “translation termination codon region” refer to a portion of such an mRNA or gene that encompasses from about 25 to about 50 contiguous nucleotides in either direction (i.e., 5′ or 3′) from a translation termination codon. Consequently, the “start codon region” (or “translation initiation codon region”) and the “stop codon region” (or “translation termination codon region”) are all regions which may be targeted effectively with the antisense compounds of the present invention.
The open reading frame (ORF) or “coding region,” which is known in the art to refer to the region between the translation initiation codon and the translation termination codon, is also a region which may be targeted effectively. Within the context of the present invention, a preferred region is the intragenic region encompassing the translation initiation or termination codon of the open reading frame (ORF) of a gene.
Other target regions include the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an mRNA in the 5′ direction from the translation initiation codon, and thus including nucleotides between the 5′ cap site and the translation initiation codon of an mRNA (or corresponding nucleotides on the gene), and the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR), known in the art to refer to the portion of an mRNA in the 3′ direction from the translation termination codon, and thus including nucleotides between the translation termination codon and 3′ end of an mRNA (or corresponding nucleotides on the gene). The 5′ cap site of an mRNA comprises an N7-methylated guanosine residue joined to the 5′-most residue of the mRNA via a 5′—5′ triphosphate linkage. The 5′ cap region of an mRNA is considered to include the 5′ cap structure itself as well as the first 50 nucleotides adjacent to the cap site. It is also preferred to target the 5′ cap region.
Although some eukaryotic mRNA transcripts are directly translated, many contain one or more regions, known as “introns,” which are excised from a transcript before it is translated. The remaining (and therefore translated) regions are known as “exons” and are spliced together to form a continuous mRNA sequence. Targeting splice sites, i.e., intron-exon junctions or exon-intron junctions, may also be particularly useful in situations where aberrant splicing is implicated in disease, or where an overproduction of a particular splice product is implicated in disease. Aberrant fusion junctions due to rearrangements or deletions are also preferred target sites. mRNA transcripts produced via the process of splicing of two (or more) mRNAs from different gene sources are known as “fusion transcripts”. It is also known that introns can be effectively targeted using antisense compounds targeted to, for example, DNA or pre-mRNA.
It is also known in the art that alternative RNA transcripts can be produced from the same genomic region of DNA. These alternative transcripts are generally known as “variants”. More specifically, “pre-mRNA variants” are transcripts produced from the same genomic DNA that differ from other transcripts produced from the same genomic DNA in either their start or stop position and contain both intronic and exonic sequence.
Upon excision of one or more exon or intron regions, or portions thereof during splicing, pre-mRNA variants produce smaller “mRNA variants”. Consequently, mRNA variants are processed pre-mRNA variants and each unique pre-mRNA variant must always produce a unique mRNA variant as a result of splicing. These mRNA variants are also known as “alternative splice variants”. If no splicing of the pre-mRNA variant occurs then the pre-mRNA variant is identical to the mRNA variant.
It is also known in the art that variants can be produced through the use of alternative signals to start or stop transcription and that pre-mRNAs and mRNAs can possess more that one start codon or stop codon. Variants that originate from a pre-mRNA or mRNA that use alternative start codons are known as “alternative start variants” of that pre-mRNA or mRNA. Those transcripts that use an alternative stop codon are known as “alternative stop variants” of that pre-mRNA or mRNA. One specific type of alternative stop variant is the “polyA variant” in which the multiple transcripts produced result from the alternative selection of one of the “polyA stop signals” by the transcription machinery, thereby producing transcripts that terminate at unique polyA sites. Within the context of the invention, the types of variants described herein are also preferred target nucleic acids.
The locations on the target nucleic acid to which the preferred antisense compounds hybridize are hereinbelow referred to as “preferred target segments.” As used herein the term “preferred target segment” is defined as at least an 8-nucleobase portion of a target region to which an active antisense compound is targeted. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is presently believed that these target segments represent portions of the target nucleic acid which are accessible for hybridization.
While the specific sequences of certain preferred target segments are set forth herein, one of skill in the art will recognize that these serve to illustrate and describe particular embodiments within the scope of the present invention. Additional preferred target segments may be identified by one having ordinary skill.
Target segments 8–80 nucleobases in length comprising a stretch of at least eight (8) consecutive nucleobases selected from within the illustrative preferred target segments are considered to be suitable for targeting as well.
Target segments can include DNA or RNA sequences that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 5′-terminus of one of the illustrative preferred target segments (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same DNA or RNA beginning immediately upstream of the 5′-terminus of the target segment and continuing until the DNA or RNA contains about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). Similarly preferred target segments are represented by DNA or RNA sequences that comprise at least the 8 consecutive nucleobases from the 3′-terminus of one of the illustrative preferred target segments (the remaining nucleobases being a consecutive stretch of the same DNA or RNA beginning immediately downstream of the 3′-terminus of the target segment and continuing until the DNA or RNA contains about 8 to about 80 nucleobases). It is also understood that preferred antisense target segments may be represented by DNA or RNA sequences that comprise at least 8 consecutive nucleobases from an internal portion of the sequence of an illustrative preferred target segment, and may extend in either or both directions until the oligonuclebtide contains about 8 to about 80 nucleobases. One having skill in the art armed with the preferred target segments illustrated herein will be able, without undue experimentation, to identify further preferred target segments.
Once one or more target regions, segments or sites have been identified, antisense compounds are chosen which are sufficiently complementary to the target, i.e., hybridize sufficiently well and with sufficient specificity, to give the desired effect.
The oligomeric antisense compounds may also be targeted to regions of the target nucleobase sequence (e.g., such as those disclosed in Examples below) comprising nucleobases 1–80, 81–160, 161–240, 241–320, 321–400, 401–480, . . . , etc, or any combination thereof.
D. Screening and Target Validation
In a further embodiment, the “preferred target segments” identified herein may be employed in a screen for additional compounds that modulate the expression of kinesin-like 1. “Modulators” are those compounds that decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1 and which comprise at least an 8-nucleobase portion which is complementary to a preferred target segment. The screening method comprises the steps of contacting a preferred target segment of a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1 with one or more candidate modulators, and selecting for one or more candidate modulators which decrease or increase the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1. Once it is shown that the candidate modulator or modulators are capable of modulating (e.g. either decreasing or increasing) the expression of a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1, the modulator may then be employed in further investigative studies of the function of kinesin-like 1, or for use as a research, diagnostic, or therapeutic agent in accordance with the present invention.
The preferred target segments of the present invention may be also be combined with their respective complementary antisense compounds of the present invention to form stabilized double-stranded (duplexed) oligonucleotides.
Such double stranded oligonueleotide moieties have been shown in the art to modulate target expression and regulate translation as well as RNA processing via an antisense mechanism. Moreover, the double-stranded moieties may be subject to chemical modifications (Fire et al., Nature, 1998, 391, 806–811; Timmons and Fire, Nature 1998, 395, 854; Timmons et al., Gene, 2001, 263, 103–112; Tabara et al., Science, 1998, 282, 430–431; Montgomery et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998, 95, 15502–15507; Tusehl et al., Genes Dev., 1999, 13, 3191–3197; Elbashir et al., Nature, 2001, 411, 494–498; Elbashir et al., Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 188–200). For example, such double-stranded moieties have been shown to inhibit the target by the classical hybridization of antisense strand of the duplex to the target, thereby triggering enzymatic degradation of the target (Tijsterman et al., Science, 2002, 295, 694–697).
The antisense compounds of the present invention can also be applied in the areas of drug discovery and target validation. The present invention comprehends the use of the compounds and preferred target segments identified herein in drug discovery efforts to elucidate relationships that exist between kinesin-like 1 and a disease state, phenotype, or condition. These methods include detecting or modulating kinesin-like 1 comprising contacting a sample, tissue, cell, or organism with the compounds of the present invention, measuring the nucleic acid or protein level of kinesin-like 1 and/or a related phenotypic or chemical endpoint at some time after treatment, and optionally comparing the measured value to a non-treated sample or sample treated with a further compound of the invention. These methods can also be performed in parallel or in combination with other experiments to determine the function of unknown genes for the process of target validation or to determine the validity of a particular gene product as a target for treatment or prevention of a particular disease, condition, or phenotype.
E. Kits, Research Reagents, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics
The antisense compounds of the present invention can be utilized for diagnostics, therapeutics, prophylaxis and as research reagents and kits. Furthermore, antisense oligonucleotides, which are able to inhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity, are often used by those of ordinary skill to elucidate the function of particular genes or to distinguish between functions of various members of a biological pathway.
For use in kits and diagnostics, the compounds of the present invention, either alone or in combination with other compounds or therapeutics, can be used as tools in differential and/or combinatorial analyses to elucidate expression patterns of a portion or the entire complement of genes expressed within cells and tissues.
As one nonlimiting example, expression patterns within cells or tissues treated with one or more antisense compounds are compared to control cells or tissues not treated with antisense compounds and the patterns produced are analyzed for differential levels of gene expression as they pertain, for example, to disease association, signaling pathway, cellular localization, expression level, size, structure or function of the genes examined. These analyses can be performed on stimulated or unstimulated cells and in the presence or absence of other compounds which affect expression patterns.
Examples of methods of gene expression analysis known in the art include DNA arrays or microarrays (Brazma-and Vilo, FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 17–24; Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2–16), SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression)(Madden, et al., Drug Discov. Today, 2000, 5, 415–425), READS (restriction enzyme amplification of digested cDNAs) (Prashar and Weissman, Methods Enzymol., 1999, 303, 258–72), TOGA (total gene expression analysis) (Sutcliffe, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2000, 97, 1976–81), protein arrays and proteomics (Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2–16; Jungblut, et al., Electrophoresis, 1999, 20, 2100–10), expressed sequence tag (EST) sequencing (Celis, et al., FEBS Lett., 2000, 480, 2–16; Larsson, et al., J. Biotechnol., 2000, 80, 143–57), subtractive RNA fingerprinting (SuRF) (Fuchs, et al., Anal. Biochem., 2000, 286, 91–98; Larson, et al., Cytometry, 2000, 41, 203–208), subtractive cloning, differential display (DD) (Jurecic and Belmont, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2000, 3, 316–21), comparative genomic hybridization (Carulli, et al., J. Cell Biochem. Suppl., 1998, 31, 286–96), FISH (fluorescent in situ hybridization) techniques (Going and Gusterson, Eur. J. Cancer, 1999, 35, 1895–904) and mass spectrometry methods (To, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 2000, 3, 235–41).
The antisense compounds of the invention are useful for research and diagnostics, because these compounds hybridize to nucleic acids encoding kinesin-like 1. For example, oligonucleotides that are shown to hybridize with such efficiency and under such conditions as disclosed herein as to be effective kinesin-like 1 inhibitors will also be effective primers or probes under conditions favoring gene amplification or detection, respectively. These primers and probes are useful in methods requiring the specific detection of-nucleic acid molecules encoding kinesin-like 1 and in the amplification of said nucleic acid molecules for detection or for use in further studies of kinesin-like 1. Hybridization of the antisense oligonucleotides, particularly the primers and probes, of the invention with a nucleic acid encoding kinesin-like 1 can be detected by means known in the art. Such means may include conjugation of an enzyme to the oligonucleotide, radiolabelling of the oligonucleotide or any other suitable detection means. Kits using such detection means for detecting the level of kinesin-like 1 in a sample may also be prepared.
The specificity and sensitivity of antisense is also harnessed by those of skill in the art for therapeutic uses. Antisense compounds have been employed as therapeutic moieties in the treatment of disease states in animals, including humans. Antisense oligonucleotide drugs, including ribozymes, have been safely and effectively administered to humans and numerous clinical trials are presently underway. It is thus established that antisense compounds can be useful therapeutic modalities that can be configured to be useful in treatment regimes for the treatment of cells, tissues and animals, especially humans.
For therapeutics, an animal, preferably a human, suspected of having a disease or disorder which can be treated by modulating the expression of kinesin-like 1 is treated by administering antisense compounds in accordance with this invention. For example, in one non-limiting embodiment, the methods comprise the step of administering to the animal in need of treatment, a therapeutically effective amount of a kinesin-like 1 inhibitor. The kinesin-like 1 inhibitors of the present invention effectively inhibit the activity of the kinesin-like 1 protein or inhibit the expression of the kinesin-like 1 protein. In one embodiment, the activity or expression of kinesin-like 1 in an animal is inhibited by about 10%. Preferably, the activity or expression of kinesin-like 1 in an animal is inhibited by about 30%. More preferably, the activity or expression of kinesin-like 1 in an animal is inhibited by 50% or more. Thus, the oligomeric antisense compounds modulate expression of kinesin-like 1 mRNA by at least 10%, by at least 20%, by at least 25%, by at least 30%, by at least 40%, by at least 50%, by at least 60%, by at least 70%, by at least 75%, by at least 80%, by at least 85%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 98%, by at least 99%, or by 100%.
For example, the reduction of the expression of kinesin-like 1 may be measured in serum, adipose tissue, liver or any other body fluid, tissue or organ of the animal. Preferably, the cells contained within said fluids, tissues or organs being analyzed contain a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1 protein and/or the kinesin-like 1 protein itself.
The antisense compounds of the invention can be utilized in pharmaceutical compositions by adding an effective amount of a compound to a suitable pharmaceutically acceptable diluent or carrier. Use of the compounds and methods of the invention may also be useful prophylactically.
F. Modifications
As is known in the art, a nucleoside is a base-sugar combination. The base portion of the nucleoside is normally a heterocyclic base sometimes referred to as a “nucleobase” or simply a “base”. The two most common classes of such heterocyclic bases are the purines and the pyrimidines. Nucleotides are nucleosides that further include a phosphate group covalently linked to the sugar portion of the nucleoside. For those nucleosides that include a pentofuranosyl sugar, the phosphate group can be linked to either the 2′, 3′ or 5′ hydroxyl moiety of the sugar. In forming oligonucleotides, the phosphate groups covalently link adjacent nucleosides to one another to form a linear polymeric compound. In turn, the respective ends of this linear polymeric compound can be further joined to form a circular compound, however, linear compounds are generally preferred. In addition, linear compounds may have internal nucleobase complementarity and may therefore fold in a manner as to produce a fully or partially double-stranded compound. Within oligonucleotides, the phosphate groups are commonly referred to as forming the internucleoside backbone of the oligonucleotide. The normal linkage or backbone of RNA and DNA is a 3′ to 5′ phosphodiester linkage.
Modified Internucleoside Linkages (Backbones)
Specific examples of preferred antisense compounds useful in this invention include oligonucleotides containing modified backbones or non-natural internucleoside linkages. As defined in this specification, oligonucleotides having modified backbones include those that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that do not have a phosphorus atom in the backbone. For the purposes of this specification, and as sometimes referenced in the art, modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in their internucleoside backbone can also be considered to be oligonucleosides.
Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones containing a phosphorus atom therein include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriaminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates including 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates and chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selenophosphates and boranophosphates having normal 3′–5′ linkages, 2′–5′ linked analogs of these, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′ or 2′ to 2′ linkage. Preferred oligonucleotides having inverted polarity comprise a single 3′ to 3′ linkage at the 3′-most internucleotide linkage i.e. a single inverted nucleoside residue which may be abasic (the nucleobase is missing or has a hydroxyl group in place thereof). Various salts, mixed salts and free acid forms are also included.
Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above phosphorus-containing linkages include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808; 4,469,863; 4,476,301; 5,023,243; 5,177,196; 5,188,897; 5,264,423; 5,276,019; 5,278,302; 5,286,717; 5,321,131; 5,399,676; 5,405,939; 5,453,496; 5,455,233; 5,466,677; 5,476,925; 5,519,126; 5,536,821; 5,541,306; 5,550,111; 5,563,253; 5,571,799; 5,587,361; 5,194,599; 5,565,555; 5,527,899; 5,721,218; 5,672,697 and 5,625,050, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Preferred modified oligonucleotide backbones that do not include a phosphorus atom therein have backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These include those having morpholino linkages (formed in part from the sugar portion of a nucleoside); siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH2 component parts.
Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above oligonucleosides include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, certain of which are commonly owned with this application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Modified Sugar and Internucleoside Linkages-Mimetics
In other preferred antisense compounds, e.g., oligonucleotide mimetics, both the sugar and the internucleoside linkage (i.e. the backbone), of the nucleotide units are replaced with novel groups. The nucleobase units are maintained for hybridization with an appropriate target nucleic acid. One such compound, an oligonucleotide mimetic that has been shown to have excellent hybridization properties, is referred to as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In PNA compounds, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with an amide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone. The nucleobases are retained and are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of PNA compounds include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, each of which is herein incorporated by reference. Further teaching of PNA compounds can be found in Nielsen et al., Science, 1991, 254, 1497–1500.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are oligonucleotides with phosphorothioate backbones and oligonucleosides with heteroatom backbones, and in particular —CH2—NH—O—CH2—, —CH2—N(CH3)—O—CH2— [known as a methylene (methylimino) or MMI backbone], —CH2—O—N(CH3)—CH2—, —CH2—N(CH3)—N(CH3)—CH2— and —O—N(CH3)—CH2—CH2— [wherein the native phosphodiester backbone is represented as —O—P—O—CH2—] of the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,677, and the amide backbones of the above referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,602,240. Also preferred are oligonucleotides having morpholino backbone structures of the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506.
Modified Sugars
Modified antisense compounds may also contain one or more substituted sugar moieties. Preferred are antisense compounds, preferably antisense oligonucleotides, comprising one of the following at the 2′ position: OH; F; O—, S—, or N-alkyl; O—, S—, or N-alkenyl; O—, S— or N-alkynyl; or O-alkyl-O-alkyl, wherein the alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl may be substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C10 alkyl or C2 to C10 alkenyl and alkynyl. Particularly preferred are O[(CH2)nO]mCH3, O(CH2)nOCH3, O(CH2)nNH2, O(CH2)nCH3, O(CH2)nONH2, and O(CH2)nON[(CH2)nCH3]2, where n and m are from 1 to about 10. Other preferred oligonucleotides comprise one of the following at the 2′ position: C1 to C10 lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl, SH, SCH3, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, CF3, OCF3, SOCH3, SO2CH3, ONO2, NO2, N3, NH2, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino, substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, an intercalator, a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties. A preferred modification includes 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-O—CH2CH2OCH3, also known as 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) or 2′-MOE) (Martin et al., Helv. Chim. Acta, 1995, 78, 486–504) i.e., an alkoxyalkoxy group. A further preferred modification includes 2′-dimethylaminooxyethoxy, i.e., a O(CH12)2ON(CH3)2 group, also known as 2′-DMAOE, as described in examples hereinbelow, and 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (also known in the art as 2′-O-dimethyl-amino-ethoxy-ethyl or 2′-DMAEOE), i.e., 2′-O—CH2—O—CH2—N(CH3)2, also described in examples hereinbelow.
Other preferred modifications include 2′-methoxy (2′-O—CH3), 2′-aminopropoxy (2′-OCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2′-allyl (2′-CH2—CH═CH2), 2′-O-allyl (2′-O—CH2—CH═CH2) and 2′-fluoro (2′-F). The 2′-modification may be in the arabino (up) position or ribo (down) position. A preferred 2′-arabino modification is 2′-F. Similar modifications may also be made at other positions on the oligonucleotide, particularly the 3′ position of the sugar on the 3′ terminal nucleotide or in 2′–5′ linked oligonucleotides-and the 5′ position of 5′ terminal nucleotide. Antisense compounds may also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutyl moieties in place of the pentofuranosyl sugar. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such modified sugar structures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,981,957; 5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786; 5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909; 5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,658,873; 5,670,633; 5,792,747; and 5,700,920, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
A further preferred modification of the sugar includes Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 3′ or 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring, thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety. The linkage is preferably a methylene (—CH2—)n group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2. LNAs and preparation thereof are described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.
Natural and Modified Nucleobases
Antisense compounds may also include nucleobase (often referred to in the art as heterocyclic base or simply as “base”) modifications or substitutions. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” nucleobases include the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U). Modified nucleobases include other synthetic and natural nucleobases such as 5-methylcytosine (5-me-C), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl (—C≡C—CH3) uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases, 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine, 5-uracil (pseudouracil), 4-thiouracil, 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines, 5-halo particularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl and other 5-substituted uracils and cytosines, 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine, 2-amino-adenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine. Further modified nucleobases include tricyclic pyrimidines such as phenoxazine cytidine(1H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), phenothiazine cytidine (1H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzothiazin-2(3H)-one), G-clamps such as a substituted phenoxazine cytidine (e.g. 9-(2-aminoethoxy)-H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), carbazole cytidine (2H-pyrimido[4,5-b]indol-2-one), pyridoindole cytidine (H-pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2-one). Modified nucleobases may also include those in which the purine or pyrimidine base is replaced with other heterocycles, for example 7-deaza-adenine, 7-deazaguanosine, 2-aminopyridine and 2-pyridone. Further nucleobases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, those disclosed in The Concise Encyclopedia Of Polymer Science And Engineering, pages 858–859, Kroschwitz, J. I., ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1990, those disclosed by Englisch et al., Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 1991, 30, 613, and those disclosed by Sanghvi, Y. S., Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Applications, pages 289–302, Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., ed., CRC Press, 1993. Certain of these nucleobases are particularly useful for increasing the binding affinity of the compounds of the invention. These include 5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O-6 substituted purines, including 2-aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluracil and 5-propynylcytosine. 5-methylcytosine substitutions have been shown to increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6–1.2° C. and are presently preferred base substitutions, even more particularly when combined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications.
Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of certain of the above noted modified nucleobases as well as other modified nucleobases include, but are not limited to, the above noted U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, as well as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,845,205; 5,130,302; 5,134,066; 5,175,273; 5,367,066; 5,432,272; 5,457,187; 5,459,255; 5,484,908; 5,502,177; 5,525,711; 5,552,540; 5,587,469; 5,594,121, 5,596,091; 5,614,617; 5,645,985; 5,830,653; 5,763,588; 6,005,096; and 5,681,941, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,692, which is commonly owned with the instant application and also herein incorporated by reference.
Conjugates
Another modification of the antisense compounds of the invention involves chemically linking to the antisense compound one or more moieties or conjugates which enhance the activity, cellular distribution or cellular uptake of the oligonucleotide. These moieties or conjugates can include conjugate groups covalently bound to functional groups such as primary or secondary hydroxyl groups. Conjugate groups of the invention include intercalators, reporter molecules, polyamines, polyamides, polyethylene glycols, polyethers, groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties of oligomers, and groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties of oligomers. Typical conjugate groups include cholesterols, lipids, phospholipids, biotin, phenazine, folate, phenanthridine, anthraquinone, acridine, fluoresceins, rhodamines, coumarins, and dyes. Groups that enhance the pharmacodynamic properties, in the context of this invention, include groups that improve uptake, enhance resistance to degradation, and/or strengthen sequence-specific hybridization with the target nucleic acid. Groups that enhance the pharmacokinetic properties, in the context of this invention, include groups that improve uptake, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the compounds of the present invention. Representative conjugate groups are disclosed in International Patent Application PCT[US92/09196, filed Oct. 23, 1992, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, the entire disclosure of which are incorporated herein by reference. Conjugate moieties include but are not limited to lipid moieties such as a cholesterol moiety, cholic acid, a thioether, e.g., hexyl-S-tritylthiol, a thiocholesterol, an aliphatic chain, e.g., dodecandiol or undecyl residues, a phospholipid, e.g., di-hexadecyl-rac-glycerol or triethyl-ammonium 1,2-di-O-hexadecyl-rac-glycero-3-H-phosphonate, a polyamine or a polyethylene glycol chain, or adamantane acetic acid, a palmityl moiety, or an octadecylamine or hexylamino-carbonyl-oxycholesterol moiety. Antisense compounds of the invention may also be conjugated to active drug substances, for example, aspirin, warfarin, phenylbutazone, ibuprofen, suprofen, fenbufen, ketoprofen, (S)-(+)-pranoprofen, carprofen, dansylsarcosine, 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, flufenarnic acid, folinic acid, a benzothiadiazide, chlorothiazide, a diazepine, indomethicin, a barbiturate, a cephalosporin, a sulfa drug, an antidiabetic, an antibacterial or an antibiotic. Oligonucleotide-drug conjugates and their preparation are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/334,130 (filed Jun. 15, 1999) which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such oligonucleotide conjugates include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,828,979; 4,948,882; 5,218,105; 5,525,465; 5,541,313; 5,545,730; 5,552,538; 5,578,717, 5,580,731; 5,580,731; 5,591,584; 5,109,124; 5,118,802; 5,138,045; 5,414,077; 5,486,603; 5,512,439; 5,578,718; 5,608,046; 4,587,044; 4,605,735; 4,667,025; 4,762,779; 4,789,737; 4,824,941; 4,835,263; 4,876,335; 4,904,582; 4,958,013; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,082,830; 5,112,963; 5,214,136; 5,245,022; 5,254,469; 5,258,506; 5,262,536; 5,272,250; 5,292,873; 5,317,098; 5,371,241, 5,391,723; 5,416,203, 5,451,463; 5,510,475; 5,512,667; 5,514,785; 5,565,552; 5,567,810; 5,574,142; 5,585,481; 5,587,371; 5,595,726; 5,597,696; 5,599,923; 5,599,928 and 5,688,941, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference.
Chimeric Compounds
It is not necessary for all positions in a given compound to be uniformly modified, and in fact more than one of the aforementioned modifications may be incorporated in a single compound or even at a single nucleoside within an oligonucleotide.
The present invention also includes antisense compounds which are chimeric compounds. “Chimeric” antisense compounds or “chimeras,” in the context of this invention, are antisense compounds, particularly oligonucleotides, which contain two or more chemically distinct regions, each made up of at least one monomer unit, i.e., a nucleotide in the case of an oligonucleotide compound. Chimeric antisense oligonucleotides are thus a form of antisense compound. These oligonucleotides typically contain at least one region wherein the oligonucleotide is modified so as to confer upon the oligonucleotide increased resistance to nuclease degradation, increased cellular uptake, increased stability and/or increased binding affinity for the target nucleic acid. An additional region of the oligonucleotide may serve as a substrate for enzymes capable of cleaving RNA:DNA or RNA:RNA hybrids. By way of example, RNAse H is a cellular endonuclease which cleaves the RNA strand of an RNA:DNA duplex. Activation of RNase H, therefore, results in cleavage of the RNA target, thereby greatly enhancing the efficiency of oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition of gene expression. The cleavage of RNA:RNA hybrids can, in like fashion, be accomplished through the actions of endoribonucleases, such as RNAseL which cleaves both cellular and viral RNA. Cleavage of the RNA target can be routinely detected by gel electrophoresis and, if necessary, associated nucleic acid hybridization techniques known in the art.
Chimeric antisense compounds of the invention may be formed as composite structures of two or more oligonucleotides, modified oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides and/or oligonucleotide mimetics as described above. Such compounds have also been referred to in the art as hybrids or gapmers. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such hybrid structures include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,013,830; 5,149,797; 5,220,007; 5,256,775; 5,366,878; 5,403,711; 5,491,133; 5,565,350; 5,623,065; 5,652,355; 5,652,356; and 5,700,922, certain of which are commonly owned with the instant application, and each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
G. Formulations
The compounds of the invention may also be admixed, encapsulated, conjugated or otherwise associated with other molecules, molecule structures or mixtures of compounds, as for example, liposomes, receptor-targeted molecules, oral, rectal, topical or other formulations, for assisting in uptake, distribution and/or absorption. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of such uptake, distribution and/or absorption-assisting formulations include, but are not limited to, U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,921; 5,354,844; 5,416,016; 5,459,127; 5,521,291; 5,543,158; 5,547,932; 5,583,020; 5,591,721; 4,426,330; 4,534,899; 5,013,556; 5,108,921; 5,213,804; 5,227,170; 5,264,221; 5,356,633; 5,395,619; 5,416,016; 5,417,978; 5,462,854; 5,469,854; 5,512,295; 5,527,528; 5,534,259; 5,543,152; 5,556,948; 5,580,575; and 5,595,756, each of which is herein incorporated by reference.
The antisense compounds of the invention encompass any pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or salts of such esters, or any other compound which, upon administration to an animal, including a hum an, is capable of providing (directly or indirectly) the biologically active metabolite or residue thereof.
The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” refers to physiologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds of the invention: i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent compound and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto. For oligonucleotides, preferred examples of pharmaceutically acceptable salts and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
The present invention also includes pharmaceutical compositions and formulations which include the antisense compounds of the invention. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be administered in a number of ways depending upon whether local or systemic treatment is desired and upon the area to be treated. Administration may be topical (including ophthalmic and to mucous membranes including vaginal and rectal delivery), pulmonary, e.g., by inhalation or insufflation of powders or aerosols, including by nebulizer; intratracheal, intranasal, epidermal and transdermal), oral or parenteral. Parenteral administration includes intravenous, intraarterial, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection or infusion; or intracranial, e.g., intrathecal or intraventricular, administration. Oligonucleotides with at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modification are believed to be particularly useful for oral administration. Pharmaceutical compositions and formulations for topical administration may include transdermal patches, ointments, lotions, creams, gels, drops, suppositories, sprays, liquids and powders. Conventional pharmaceutical carriers, aqueous, powder or oily bases, thickeners and the like may be necessary or desirable. Coated condoms, gloves and the like may also be useful.
The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention, which may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form, may be prepared according to conventional techniques well known in the pharmaceutical industry. Such techniques include the step of bringing into association the active ingredients with the pharmaceutical carrier(s) or excipient(s). In general, the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association the active ingredients with liquid carriers or finely divided solid carriers or both, and then, if necessary, shaping the product.
The compositions of the present invention may be formulated into any of many possible dosage forms such as, but not limited to, tablets, capsules, gel capsules, liquid syrups, soft gels, suppositories, and enemas. The compositions of the present invention may also be formulated as suspensions in aqueous, non-aqueous or mixed media. Aqueous suspensions may further contain substances which increase the viscosity of the suspension including, for example, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, sorbitol and/or dextran. The suspension may also contain stabilizers.
Pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention include, but are not limited to, solutions, emulsions, foams and liposome-containing formulations. The pharmaceutical compositions and formulations of the present invention may comprise one or more penetration enhancers, carriers, excipients or other active or inactive ingredients.
Emulsions are typically heterogenous systems of one liquid dispersed in another in the form of droplets usually exceeding 0.1 μm in diameter. Emulsions may contain additional components in addition to the dispersed phases, and the active drug which may be present as a solution in either the aqueous phase, oily phase or itself as a separate phase. Microemulsions are included as an embodiment of the present invention. Emulsions and their uses are well known in the art and are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
Formulations of the present invention include liposomal formulations. As used in the present invention, the term “liposome” means a vesicle composed of amphiphilic lipids arranged in a spherical bilayer or bilayers. Liposomes are unilamellar or multilamellar vesicles which have a membrane formed from a lipophilic material and an aqueous interior that contains the composition to be delivered. Cationic liposomes are positively charged liposomes which are believed to interact with negatively charged DNA molecules to form a stable complex. Liposomes that are pH-sensitive or negatively-charged are believed to entrap DNA rather than complex with it. Both cationic and noncationic liposomes have been used to deliver DNA to cells.
Liposomes also include “sterically stabilized” liposomes, a term which, as used herein, refers to liposomes comprising one or more specialized lipids that, when incorporated into liposomes, result in enhanced circulation lifetimes relative to liposomes lacking such specialized lipids. Examples of sterically stabilized liposomes are those in which part of the vesicle-forming lipid portion of the liposome comprises one or more glycolipids or is derivatized with one or more hydrophilic polymers, such as a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety. Liposomes and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
The pharmaceutical formulations and compositions of the present invention may also include surfactants. The use of surfactants in drug products, formulations and in emulsions is well known in the art. Surfactants and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
In one embodiment, the present invention employs various penetration enhancers to effect the efficient delivery of nucleic acids, particularly oligonucleotides. In addition to aiding the diffusion of non-lipophilic drugs across cell membranes, penetration enhancers also enhance the permeability of lipophilic drugs. Penetration enhancers may be classified as belonging to one of five broad categories, i.e., surfactants, fatty acids, bile salts, chelating agents, and non-chelating non-surfactants. Penetration enhancers and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
One of skill in the art will recognize that formulations are routinely designed according to their intended use, i.e. route of administration.
Preferred formulations for topical administration include those in which the oligonucleotides of the invention are in admixture with a topical delivery agent such as lipids, liposomes, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, steroids, chelating agents and surfactants. Preferred lipids and liposomes include neutral (e.g. dioleoylphosphatidyl DOPE ethanolamine, dimyristoylphosphatidyl choline DMPC, distearolyphosphatidyl choline) negative (e.g. dimyristoylphosphatidyl glycerol DMPG) and cationic (e.g. dioleoyltetramethylaminopropyl DOTAP and dioleoylphosphatidyl ethanolamine DOTMA).
For topical or other administration, oligonucleotides of the invention may be encapsulated within liposomes or may form complexes thereto, in particular to cationic liposomes. Alternatively, oligonucleotides may be complexed to lipids, in particular to cationic lipids. Preferred fatty acids and esters, pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Topical formulations are described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/315,298 filed on May 20, 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Compositions and formulations for oral administration include powders or granules, microparticulates, nanoparticulates, suspensions or solutions in water or non-aqueous media, capsules, gel capsules, sachets, tablets or minitablets. Thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers, dispersing aids or binders may be desirable. Preferred oral formulations are those in which oligonucleotides of the invention are administered in conjunction with one or more penetration enhancers surfactants and chelators. Preferred surfactants include fatty acids and/or esters or salts thereof, bile acids and/or salts thereof. Preferred bile acids/salts and fatty acids and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Also preferred are combinations of penetration enhancers, for example, fatty acids/salts in combination with bile acids/salts. A particularly preferred combination is the sodium salt of lauric acid, capric acid and UDCA. Further penetration enhancers include polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether, polyoxyethylene-20-cetyl ether. Oligonucleotides of the invention may be delivered orally, in granular form including sprayed dried particles, or complexed to form micro or nanoparticles. Oligonucleotide complexing agents and their uses are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,287,860, which is incorporated herein in its entirety. Oral formulations for oligonucleotides and their preparation are described in detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/108,673 (filed Jul. 1, 1998), Ser. No. 09/315,298 (filed May 20, 1999) and Ser. No. 10/071,822, filed Feb. 8, 2002, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Compositions and formulations for parenteral, intrathecal or intraventricular administration may include sterile aqueous solutions which may also contain buffers, diluents and other suitable additives such as, but not limited to, penetration enhancers, carrier compounds and other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients.
Certain embodiments of the invention provide pharmaceutical compositions containing one or more oligomeric compounds and one or more other chemotherapeutic agents which function by a non-antisense mechanism. Examples of such chemotherapeutic agents include but are not limited to cancer chemotherapeutic drugs such as daunorubicin, daunomycin, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, esorubicin, bleomycin, mafosfamide, ifosfamide, cytosine arabinoside, bis-chloroethylnitrosurea, busulfan, mitomycin C, actinomycin D, mithramycin, prednisone, hydroxyprogesterone, testosterone, tamoxifen, dacarbazine, procarbazine, hexamethyl-melamine, pentamethylmelamine, mitoxantrone, amsacrine, chlorambucil, methylcyclohexylnitrosurea, nitrogen mustards, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, cytarabine, 5-azacytidine, hydroxyurea, deoxycoformycin, 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphoramide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FUdR), methotrexate (MTX), colchicine, taxol, vincristine, vinblastine, etoposide (VP-16), trimetrexate, irinotecan, topotecan, gemcitabine, teniposide, cisplatin and diethylstilbestrol (DES). When used with the compounds of the invention, such chemotherapeutic agents may be used individually (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide), sequentially (e.g., 5-FU and oligonucleotide for a period of time followed by MTX and oligonucleotide), or in combination with one or more other such chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 5-FU, MTX and oligonucleotide, or 5-FU, radiotherapy and oligonucleotide). Anti-inflammatory drugs, including but not limited to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids, and antiviral drugs, including but not limited to ribivirin, vidarabine, acyclovir and ganciclovir, may also be combined in compositions of the invention. Combinations of antisense compounds and other non-antisense drugs are also within the scope of this invention. Two or more combined compounds may be used together or sequentially.
In another related embodiment, compositions of the invention may contain one or more antisense compounds, particularly oligonucleotides, targeted to a first nucleic acid and one or more additional antisense compounds targeted to a second nucleic acid target. Alternatively, compositions of the invention may contain two or more antisense compounds targeted to different regions of the same nucleic acid target. Numerous examples of antisense compounds are known in the art. Two or more combined compounds may be used together or sequentially.
H. Dosing
The formulation of therapeutic compositions and their subsequent administration (dosing) is believed to be within the skill of those in the art. Dosing is dependent on severity and responsiveness of the disease state to be treated, with the course of treatment lasting from several days to several months, or until a cure is effected or a diminution of the disease state is achieved. Optimal dosing schedules can be calculated from measurements of drug accumulation in the body of the patient. Persons of ordinary skill can easily determine optimum dosages, dosing methodologies and repetition rates. Optimum dosages may vary depending on the relative potency of individual oligonucleotides, and can generally be estimated based on EC50s found to be effective in in vitro and in vivo animal models. In general, dosage is from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kg of body weight, and may be given once or more daily, weekly, monthly or yearly, or even once every 2 to 20 years. Persons of ordinary skill in the art can easily estimate repetition rates for dosing based on measured residence times and concentrations of the drug in bodily fluids or tissues. Following successful treatment, it may be desirable to have the patient undergo maintenance therapy to prevent the recurrence of the disease state, wherein the oligonucleotide is administered in maintenance doses, ranging from 0.01 ug to 100 g per kg of body weight, once or more daily, to once every 20 years.
While the present invention has been described with specificity in accordance with certain of its preferred embodiments, the following examples serve only to illustrate the invention and are not intended to limit the same. Each of the references, GenBank accession numbers, and the like recited in the present application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Synthesis of Nucleoside Phosphoramidites
The following compounds, including amidites and their intermediates were prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,220 and published PCT WO 02/36743; 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-thymidine intermediate for 5-methyl dC amidite, 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-deoxy-5-methylcytidine intermediate for 5-methyl-dC amidite, 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-deoxy-N-4-benzoyl-5-methylcytidine penultimate intermediate for 5-methyl dC amidite, [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-deoxy-N4-benzoyl-5-methylcytidin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (5-methyl dC amidite), 2′-Fluorodeoxyadenosine, 2′-Fluorodeoxyguanosine, 2′-Fluorouridine, 2′-Fluorodeoxycytidine, 2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl) modified amidites, 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methyluridine intermediate, 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methyluridine penultimate intermediate, [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methyluridin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE T amidite), 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-5-methylcytidine intermediate, 5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N4-benzoyl-5-methyl-cytidine penultimate intermediate, [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-(2-methoxyethyl)-N4-benzoyl-5-methylcytidin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE 5-Me-C amidite), [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N6-benzoyladenosin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE A amdite), [5′-O-(4,4′-Dimethoxytriphenylmethyl)-2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)-N4-isobutyrylguanosin-3′-O-yl]-2-cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite (MOE G amidite), 2′-O-(Aminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites and 2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl) nucleoside amidites, 2′-(Dimethylaminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites, 5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-O2-2′-anhydro-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-(2-hydroxyethyl)-5-methyluridine, 2′-O-([2-phthalimidoxy)ethyl]-5′-t-butyldiphenylsilyl-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-tert-butyldiphenylsilyl-2′-O-[(2-formadoximinooxy)ethyl]-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-tert-Butyldiphenylsiiyl-2′-O-[N,N dimethylaminooxyethyl]-5-methyluridine, 2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine, 5′-O-DMT-2′-O-(2-N,N-dimethylaminooxyethyl)-5-methyluridine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite], 2′-(Aminooxyethoxy) nucleoside amidites, N2-isobutyryl-6-O-diphenylcarbamoyl-2′-O-(2-ethylacetyl)-5′-O-(4,4′-dimethoxytrityl)guanosine-3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-N,N-diisopropylphosphoramidite], 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (2′-DMAEOE) nucleoside amidites, 2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)ethyl]-5-methyl uridine, 5′-O-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-[2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)-ethyl)]-5-methyl uridine and 5′-O-Dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-2(2-N,N-dimethylaminoethoxy)-ethyl)]-5-methyl uridine-3′-O-(cyanoethyl-N,N-diisopropyl)phosphoramidite.
Example 2
Oligonucleotide and Oligonucleoside Synthesis
The antisense compounds used in accordance with this invention may be conveniently and routinely made through the well-known technique of solid phase synthesis. Equipment for such synthesis is sold by several vendors including; for example, Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.). Any other means for such synthesis known in the art may additionally or alternatively be employed. It is well known to use similar techniques to prepare oligonucleotides such as the phosphorothioates and alkylated derivatives.
Oligonucleotides: Unsubstituted and substituted phosphodiester (P═O) oligonucleotides are synthesized on an automated DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems model 394) using standard phosphoramidite chemistry with oxidation by iodine.
Phosphorothioates (P═S) are synthesized similar to phosphodiester oligonucleotides with the following exceptions: thiation was effected by utilizing a 10% w/v solution of 3,H-1,2-benzodithiole-3-one 1,1-dioxide in acetonitrile for the oxidation of the phosphite linkages. The thiation reaction step time was increased to 180 sec and preceded by the normal capping step. After cleavage from the CPG column and deblocking in concentrated ammonium hydroxide at 55° C. (12–16 hr), the oligonucleotides were recovered by precipitating with >3 volumes of ethanol from a 1 M NH4OAc solution. Phosphinate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,508,270, herein incorporated by reference.
Alkyl phosphonate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,469,863, herein incorporated by referece.
3′-Deoxy-3′-methylene phosphonate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,610,289 or 5,625,050, herein incorporated by reference.
Phosphoramidite oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,256,775 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,878, herein incorporated by reference.
Alkylphosphonothioate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in published PCT applications PCT/US94/00902 and PCT/US93/06976 (published as WO 94/17093 and WO 94/02499, respectively), herein incorporated by reference.
3′-Deoxy-3′-amino phosphoramidate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,925, herein incorporated by reference.
Phosphotriester oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,023,243, herein incorporated by reference.
Borano phosphate oligonucleotides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,130,302 and 5,177,198, both herein incorporated by reference.
Oligonucleosides: Methylenemethylimino linked oligonucleosides, also identified as MMI linked oligonucleosides, methylenedimethylhydrazo linked oligonucleosides, also identified as MDH linked oligonucleosides, and methylenecarbonylamino linked oligonucleosides, also identified as amide-3 linked oligonucleosides, and methyleneaminocarbonyl linked oligonucleosides, also identified as amide-4 linked oligonucleosides, as well as mixed backbone compounds having, for instance, alternating MMI and P═O or P═S linkages are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,378,825, 5,386,023, 5,489,677, 5,602,240 and 5,610,289, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Formacetal and thioformacetal linked oligonucleosides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,264,562 and 5,264,564, herein incorporated by reference.
Ethylene oxide linked oligonucleosides are prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,223,618, herein incorporated by reference.
Example 3
RNA Synthesis
In general, RNA synthesis chemistry is based on the selective incorporation of various protecting groups at strategic intermediary reactions. Although one of ordinary skill in the art will understand the use of protecting groups in organic synthesis, a useful class of protecting groups includes silyl ethers. In particular bulky silyl ethers are used to protect the 5′-hydroxyl in combination with an acid-labile orthoester protecting group on the 2′-hydroxyl. This set of protecting groups is then used with standard solid-phase synthesis technology. It is important to lastly remove the acid labile orthoester protecting group after all other synthetic steps. Moreover, the early use of the silyl protecting groups during synthesis ensures facile removal when desired, without undesired deprotection of 2′ hydroxyl.
Following this procedure for the sequential protection of the 5′-hydroxyl in combination with protection of the 2′-hydroxyl by protecting groups that are differentially removed and are differentially chemically labile, RNA oligonucleotides were synthesized.
RNA oligonucleotides are synthesized in a stepwise fashion. Each nucleotide is added sequentially (3′- to 5′-direction) to a solid support-bound oligonucleotide. The first nucleoside at the 3′-end of the chain is covalently attached to a solid support. The nucleotide precursor, a ribonucleoside phosphoramidite, and activator are added, coupling the second base onto the 5′-end of the first nucleoside. The support is washed and any unreacted 5′-hydroxyl groups are capped with acetic anhydride to yield 5′-acetyl moieties. The linkage is then oxidized to the more stable and ultimately desired P(V) linkage. At the end of the nucleotide addition cycle; the 5′-silyl group is cleaved with fluoride. The cycle is repeated for each subsequent nucleotide.
Following synthesis, the methyl protecting groups on the phosphates are cleaved in 30 minutes utilizing 1 M disodium-2-carbamoyl-2-cyanoethylene-1,1-dithiolate trihydrate (S2Na2) in DMF. The deprotection solution is washed from the solid support-bound oligonucleotide using water. The support is then treated with 40% methylamine in water for 10 minutes at 55° C. This releases the RNA oligonucleotides into solution, deprotects the exocyclic amines, and modifies the 2′-groups. The oligonucleotides can be analyzed by anion exchange HPLC at this stage.
The 2′-orthoester groups are the last protecting groups to be removed. The ethylene glycol monoacetate orthoester protecting group developed by Dharmacon Research, Inc. (Lafayette, Colo.), is one example of a useful orthoester protecting group which, has the following important properties. It is stable to the conditions of nucleoside phosphoramidite synthesis and oligonucleotide synthesis. However, after oligonucleotide synthesis the oligonucleotide is treated with methylamine which not only cleaves the oligonucleotide from the solid support but also removes the acetyl groups from the orthoesters. The resulting 2-ethyl-hydroxyl substituents on the orthoester are less electron withdrawing than the acetylated precursor. As a result, the modified orthoester becomes more labile to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. Specifically, the rate of cleavage is approximately 10 times faster after the acetyl groups are removed. Therefore, this orthoester possesses sufficient stability in order to be compatible with oligonucleotide synthesis and yet, when subsequently modified, permits deprotection to be carried out under relatively mild aqueous conditions compatible with the final RNA oligonucleotide product.
Additionally, methods of RNA synthesis are well known in the art (Scaringe, S. A. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Colorado, 1996; Scaringe, S. A., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 11820–11821; Matteucci, M. D. and Caruthers, M. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 3185–3191; Beaucage, S. L. and Caruthers, M. H. Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 1859–1862; Dahl, B. J., et al., Acta Chem. Scand., 1990, 44, 639–641; Reddy, M. P., et al., Tetrahedrom Lett., 1994, 25, 4311–4314; Wincott, F. et al., Nucleic Acids Res., 1995, 23, 2677–2684; Griffin, B. E., et al., Tetrahedron, 1967, 23, 2301–2313; Griffin, B. E., et al., Tetrahedron, 1967, 23, 2315–2331).
RNA antisense compounds (RNA oligonucleotides) of the present invention can be synthesized by the methods herein or purchased from Dharmacon Research, Inc (Lafayette, Colo.). Once synthesized, complementary RNA antisense compounds can then be annealed by methods known in the art to form double stranded (duplexed) antisense compounds. For example, duplexes can be formed by combining 30 μl of each of the complementary strands of RNA oligonucleotides (50 uM RNA oligonucleotide solution) and 15 μl of 5× annealing buffer (100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, 2 mM magnesium acetate) followed by heating for 1 minute at 90° C., then 1 hour at 37° C. The resulting duplexed antisense compounds can be used in kits, assays, screens, or other methods to investigate the role of a target nucleic acid, or for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes.
Example 4
Synthesis of Chimeric Compounds
Chimeric oligonucleotides, oligonucleosides or mixed oligonucleotides/oligonucleosides of the invention can be of several different types. These include a first type wherein the “gap” segment of linked nucleosides is positioned between 5′ and 3′ “wing” segments of linked nucleosides and a second “open end” type wherein the “gap” segment is located at either the 3′ or the 5′ terminus of the oligomeric compound. Oligonucleotides of the first type are also known in the art as “gapmers” or gapped oligonucleotides. Oligonucleotides of the second type are also known in the art as “hemimers” or “wingmers”.
[2′-O-Me]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-Me] Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides
Chimeric oligonucleotides having 2′-O-alkyl phosphorothioate and 2′-deoxy phosphorothioate oligonucleotide segments are synthesized using an Applied Biosystems automated DNA synthesizer Model 394, as above. Oligonucleotides are synthesized using the automated synthesizer and 2′-deoxy-5′-dimethoxytrityl-3′-O-phosphoramidite for the DNA portion and 5′-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-methyl-3′-O-phosphoramidite for 5′ and 3′ wings. The standard synthesis cycle is modified by incorporating coupling steps with increased reaction times for the 5′-dimethoxytrityl-2′-O-methyl-3′-O-phosphoramidite. The fully protected oligonucleotide is cleaved from the support and deprotected in concentrated ammonia (NH4OH) for 12–16 hr at 55° C. The deprotected oligo is then recovered by an appropriate method (precipitation, column chromatography, volume reduced in vacuo and analyzed spetrophotometrically for yield and for purity by capillary electrophoresis and by mass spectrometry.
[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-(Methoxyethyl)] Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides
[2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl)]-[2′-deoxy]-[2′-O-(methoxyethyl)] chimeric phosphorothioate oligonucleotides were prepared as per the procedure above for the 2′-O-methyl chimeric oligonucleotide, with the substitution of 2′-O-(methoxyethyl) amidites for the 2′-O-methyl amidites.
[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl)Phosphodiester]-[2′-deoxy Phosphorothioate]-[2′-O-(2-Methoxyethyl) Phosphodiester] Chimeric Oligonucleotides
[2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl phosphodiester]-[2′-deoxy phosphorothioate]-[2′-O-(methoxyethyl) phosphodiester] chimeric oligonucteotides are prepared as per the above procedure for the 2′-O-methyl chimeric oligonucleotide with the substitution of 2′-O-(methoxyethyl) amidites for the 2′-O-methyl amidites, oxidation with iodine to generate the phosphodiester internucleotide linkages within the wing portions of the chimeric structures and sulfurization utilizing 3,H-1,2 benzodithiole-3-one 1,1 dioxide (Beaucage Reagent) to generate the phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages for the center gap.
Other chimeric oligonucleotides, chimeric oligonucleosides and mixed chimeric oligonucleotides/oligonucleosides are synthesized according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,623,065, herein incorporated by reference.
Example 5
Design and Screening of Duplexed Antisense Compounds Targeting Kinesin-like 1
In accordance with the present invention, a series of nucleic acid duplexes comprising the antisense compounds of the present invention and their complements can be designed to target kinesin-like 1. The nucleobase sequence of the antisense strand of the duplex comprises at least an 8-nucleobase portion of an oligonucleotide in Table 1. The ends of the strands may be modified by the addition of one or more natural or modified nucleobases to form an overhang. The sense strand of the dsRNA is then designed and synthesized as the complement of the antisense strand and may also contain modifications or additions to either terminus. For example, in one embodiment, both strands of the dsRNA duplex would be complementary over the central nucleobases, each having overhangs at one or both termini.
For example, a duplex comprising an antisense strand having the sequence CGAGAGGCGGACGGGACCG and having a two-nucleobase overhang of deoxythymidine(dT) would have the following structure:




In another embodiment, a duplex comprising an antisense strand having the same sequence CGAGAGGCGGACGGGACCG may be prepared with blunt ends (no single stranded overhang) as shown:




RNA strands of the duplex can be synthesized by methods disclosed herein or purchased from Dharmacon Research Inc., (Lafayette, Colo.). Once synthesized, the complementary strands are annealed. The single strands are aliquoted and diluted to a concentration of 50 uM. Once diluted, 30 uL of each strand is combined with 15 uL of a 5× solution of annealing buffer. The final concentration of said buffer is 100 mM potassium acetate, 30 mM HEPES-KOH pH 7.4, and 2 mM magnesium acetate. The final volume is 75 uL. This solution is incubated for 1 minute at 90° C. and then centrifuged for 15 seconds. The tube is allowed to sit for 1 hour at 37° C. at which time the dsRNA duplexes are used in experimentation. The final concentration of the dsRNA duplex is 20 uM. This solution can be stored frozen (−20° C.) and freeze-thawed up to 5 times.
Once prepared, the duplexed antisense compounds are evaluated for their ability to modulate kinesin-like 1 expression. When cells reach 80% confluency, they are treated with duplexed antisense compounds of the invention. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells are washed once with 200 μL OPTI-MEM-1 reduced-serum medium (Gibco BRL) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEM-1 containing 12 μg/mL LIPOFECTIN (Gibco BRL) and the desired duplex antisense compound at a final concentration of 200 nM. After 5 hours of treatment, the medium is replaced with fresh medium. Cells are harvested 16 hours after treatment, at Which time RNA is isolated and target reduction measured by RT-PCR.
Example 6
Oligonucleotide Isolation
After cleavage from the controlled pore glass solid support and deblocking in concentrated ammonium hydroxide at 55° C. for 12–16 hours, the oligonucleotides or oligonucleosides are recovered by precipitation out of 1 M NH4OAc with >3 volumes of ethanol. Synthesized oligonucleotides were analyzed by electrospray mass spectroscopy (molecular weight determination) and by capillary gel electrophoresis and judged to be at least 70% full length material. The relative amounts of phosphorothioate and phosphodiester linkages obtained in the synthesis was determined by the ratio of correct molecular weight relative to the −16 amu product (+/−32+/−48). For some studies oligonucleotides were purified by HPLC, as described by Chiang et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 18162–18171. Results obtained with HPLC-purified material were similar to those obtained with non-HPLC purified material.
Example 7
Oligonucleotide Synthesis—96 Well Plate Format
Oligonucleotides were synthesized via solid phase P(III) phosphoramidite chemistry on an automated synthesizer capable of assembling 96 sequences simultaneously in a 96-well format. Phosphodiester internucleotide linkages were afforded by oxidation with aqueous iodine. Phosphorothioate internucleotide linkages were generated by sulfurization utilizing 3,H-1,2 benzodithiole-3-one 1,1 dioxide (Beaucage Reagent) in anhydrous acetonitrile. Standard base-protected beta-cyanoethyl-diiso-propyl phosphoramidites were purchased from commercial vendors (e.g. PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., or Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.). Non-standard nucleosides are synthesized as per standard or patented methods. They are utilized as base protected beta-cyanoethyldiisopropyl phosphoramidites.
Oligonucleotides were cleaved from support and deprotected with concentrated NH4OH at elevated temperature (55–60° C.) for 12–16 hours and the released product then dried in vacuo. The dried product was then re-suspended in sterile water to afford a master plate from which all analytical and test plate samples are then diluted utilizing robotic pipettors.
Example 8
Oligonucleotide Analysis—96-Well Plate Format
The concentration of oligonucleotide in each well was assessed by dilution of samples and UV absorption spectroscopy. The full-length integrity of the individual products was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis (CE) in either the 96-well format (Beckman P/ACETM MDQ) or, for individually prepared samples, on a commercial CE apparatus (e.g., Beckman P/ACETM 5000, ABI 270). Base and backbone composition was confirmed by mass analysis of the compounds utilizing electrospray-mass spectroscopy. All assay test plates were diluted from the master plate using single and multi-channel robotic pipettors. Plates were judged to be acceptable if at least 85% of the compounds on the plate were at least 85% full length.
Example 9
Cell Culture and Oligonucleotide Treatment
The effect of antisense compounds on target nucleic acid expression can be tested in any of a variety of cell types provided that the target nucleic acid is present at measurable levels. This can be routinely determined using, for example, PCR or Northern blot analysis. The following cell types are provided for illustrative purposes, but other cell types can be routinely used, provided that the target is expressed in the cell type chosen. This can be readily determined by methods routine in the art, for example Northern blot analysis, ribonuclease protection assays, or RT-PCR.
T-24 Cells:
The human transitional cell bladder carcinoma cell line T-24 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). T-24 cells were routinely cultured in complete McCoy's 5A basal media (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.), penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 micrograms per mL (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for use in RT-PCR analysis.
For Northern blotting or other analysis, cells may be seeded onto 100 mm or other standard tissue culture plates and treated similarly, using appropriate volumes of medium and oligonucleotide.
A549 Cells:
The human lung carcinoma cell line A549 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). A549 cells were routinely cultured in DMEM basal media (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.), penicillin 100 units per mL, and streptomycin 100 micrograms per mL (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence.
NHDF Cells:
Human neonatal dermal fibroblast (NHDF) were obtained from the Clonetics Corporation (Walkersville, Md.). NHDFs were routinely maintained in Fibroblast Growth Medium (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville, Md.) supplemented as recommended by the supplier. Cells were maintained for up to 10 passages as recommended by the supplier.
HEK Cells:
Human embryonic keratinocytes (HEK) were obtained from the Clonetics Corporation (Walkersville, Md.). HEKs were routinely maintained in Keratinocyte Growth Medium (Clonetics Corporation, Walkersville, Md.) formulated as recommended by the supplier. Cells were routinely maintained for up to 10 passages as recommended by the supplier.
T47D Cells:
The T47D breast adenocarcinoma cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, Va.). Cells were cultured in Gibco DMEM High glucose media supplemented with 10% FBS.
For cell cycle assays, cells are plated in 24-well plates at 170,000 cells per well.
MCF7:
The human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). MCF-7 cells were routinely cultured in DMEM low glucose (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence. Cells were seeded into 96-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3872) at a density of 7000 cells/well for use in RT-PCR analysis.
For cell cycle assays, cells are plated in 24-well plates at 140,000 cells per well.
HMEC:
The human mammary epithelial cell line HMEC was obtained from BioWhittacker (Clonetics). HMEC cells were routinely cultured in Mammary Epithelial Growth Medium, BioWhittacker (Clonetics). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when'they reached 70% confluence. Cells were seeded into 24-well plates (Nunc-Nuncolon cat. #143982) at a density of 60,000 cells/well for use in subsequent analyses.
b.END Cells:
The mouse brain endothelial cell line b.END was obtained from Dr. Werner Risau at the Max Plank Institute (Bad Nauheim, Germany). b.END cells were routinely cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco/Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Cells were routinely passaged by trypsinization and dilution when they reached 90% confluence. Cells were seeded into 24-well plates (Falcon-Primaria #3047) at a density of 40,000 cells/well for use in RT-PCR analysis.
For Northern blotting or other analyses, cells may be seeded onto 100 mm or other standard tissue culture plates and treated similarly, using appropriate volumes of medium and oligonucleotide.
Treatment with Antisense Compounds:
When cells reached 70% confluency, they were treated with oligonucleotide. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells were washed once with 100 μL OPTI-MEMTM-1 reduced-serum medium (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEMTM-1 containing 3.75 μg/mL LIPOFECTINTM (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and the desired concentration of oligonucleotide. After 4–7 hours of treatment, the medium was replaced with fresh medium. Cells were harvested 16–24 hours after oligonucleotide treatment.
The concentration of oligonucleotide used varies from cell line to cell line. To determine the optimal oligonucleotide concentration for a particular cell line, the cells are treated with a positive control oligonucleotide at a range of concentrations. For human cells the positive control oligonucleotide is ISIS 13920, TCCGTCATCGCTCCTCAGGG, SEQ ID NO: 1, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl gapmer (2′-O-methoxyethyls shown in bold) with a phosphorothioate backbone which is targeted to human H-ras. For mouse or rat cells the positive control oligonucleotide is ISIS 15770, ATGCATTCTGCCCCCAAGGA, SEQ ID NO: 2, a 2′-O-methoxyethyl gapmer (2′-O-methoxyethyls shown in bold) with a phosphorothioate backbone which is targeted to both mouse and rat c-raf. The concentration of positive control oligonucleotide that results in 80% inhibition of c-Ha-ras (for ISIS 13920) or c-raf (for ISIS 15770) mRNA is then utilized as the screening concentration for new oligonucleotides in subsequent experiments for that cell line. If 80% inhibition is not achieved, the lowest concentration of positive control oligonucleotide that results in 60% inhibition of H-ras or c-raf mRNA is then utilized as the oligonucleotide screening concentration in subsequent experiments for that cell line. If 60% inhibition is not achieved, that particular cell line is deemed as unsuitable for oligonucleotide transfection experiments.
Example 10
Analysis of Oligonucleotide Inhibition of Kinesin-like 1 Expression
Antisense modulation of kinesin-like 1 expression can be assayed in a variety of ways known in the art. For example, kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels can be quantitated by, e.g., Northern blot analysis, competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Real-time quantitative PCR is presently preferred. RNA analysis can be performed on total cellular RNA or poly(A)+ mRNA. The preferred method of RNA analysis of the present invention is the use of total cellular RNA as described in other examples herein. Methods of RNA isolation are taught in, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 1, pp. 4.1.1–4.2.9 and 4.5.1–4.5.3, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993. Northern blot analysis is routine in the art and is taught in, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 1, pp. 4.2.1–4.2.9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996. Real-time quantitative (PCR) can be conveniently accomplished using the commercially available ABI PRISMTM 7700 Sequence Detection System, available from PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif. and used according to manufacturer's instructions.
Protein levels of kinesin-like 1 can be quantitated in a variety of ways well known in the art, such as immunoprecipitation, Western blot analysis (immunoblotting), ELISA or fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Antibodies directed to kinesin-like 1 can be identified and obtained from a variety of sources, such as the MSRS catalog of antibodies (Aerie Corporation, Birmingham, Mich.), or can be prepared via conventional antibody generation methods. Methods for preparation of polyclonal antisera are taught in, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 11.12.1–11.12.9, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997). Preparation of monoclonal antibodies is taught in, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 11.4.1–11.11.5, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997).
Immunoprecipitation methods are standard in the art and can be found at, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 10.16.1–10.16.11, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998). Western blot (immunoblot) analysis is standard in the art and can be found at, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 10.8.1–10.8.21, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are standard in the art and can be found at, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 2, pp. 11.2.1–11.2.22, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1991).
Example 11
Poly(A)+ mRNA Isolation
Poly(A)+ mRNA was isolated according to Miura et al., (Clin. Chem., 1996, 42, 1758–1764). Other methods for poly(A)+ mRNA isolation are taught in, for example, Ausubel, F. M. et al., (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Volume 1, pp. 4.5.1–4.5.3, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993). Briefly, for cells grown on 96-well plates, growth medium was removed from the cells and each well was washed with 200 μL cold PBS. 60 μL lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 20 mM vanadyl-ribonucleoside complex) was added to each well, the plate was gently agitated and then incubated at room temperature for five minutes. 55 μL of lysate was transferred to Oligo d(T) coated 96-well plates (AGCT Inc., Irvine Calif.). Plates were incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature, washed 3 times with 200 μL of wash buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.3 M NaCl). After the final wash, the plate was blotted on paper towels to remove excess wash buffer and then air-dried for 5 minutes. 60 μL of elution buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6), preheated to 70° C., was added to each well, the plate was incubated on a 90° C. hot plate for 5 minutes, and the eluate was then transferred to a fresh 96-well plate.
Cells grown on 100 mm or other standard plates may be treated similarly, using appropriate volumes of all solutions.
Example 12
Total RNA Isolation
Total RNA was isolated using an RNEASY 96TM kit and buffers purchased from Qiagen Inc. (Valencia, Calif.) following the manufacturer's recommended procedures. Briefly, for cells grown on 96-well plates, growth medium was removed from the cells and each well was washed with 200 μL cold PBS. 150 μL Buffer RLT was added to each well and the plate vigorously agitated for 20 seconds. 150 μL of 70% ethanol was then added to each well and the contents mixed by pipetting three times up and down. The samples were then transferred to the RNEASY 96TM well plate attached to a QIAVACTM manifold fitted with a waste collection tray and attached to a vacuum source. Vacuum was applied for 1 minute. 500 μL of Buffer RW1 was added to each well of the RNEASY 96TM plate and incubated for 15 minutes and the vacuum was again applied for 1 minute. An additional 500 μL of Buffer RW 1 was added to each well of the RNEASY 96TM plate and the vacuum was applied for 2 minutes. 1 mL of Buffer RPE was then added to each well of the RNEASY 96TM plate and the vacuum applied for a period of 90 seconds. The Buffer RPE wash was then repeated and the vacuum was applied for an additional 3 minutes. The plate was then removed from the QIAVACTM manifold and blotted dry on paper towels. The plate was then re-attached to the QIAVACTM manifold fitted with a collection tube rack containing 1.2 mL collection tubes. RNA was then eluted by pipetting 170 μL water into each well, incubating 1 minute, and then applying the vacuum for 3 minutes.
The repetitive pipetting and elution steps may be automated using a QIAGEN Bio-Robot 9604 (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia Calif.). Essentially, after lysing of the cells on the culture plate, the plate is transferred to the robot deck where the pipetting, DNase treatment and elution steps are carried out.
Example 13
Real-time Quantitative PCR Analysis of Kinesin-like 1 mRNA Levels
Quantitation of kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels was determined by real-time quantitative PCR using the ABI PRISMTM 7700 Sequence Detection System (PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) according to manufacturer's instructions. This is a closed-tube, non-gel-based, fluorescence detection system which allows high-throughput quantitation of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products in real-time. As opposed to standard PCR in which amplification products are quantitated after the PCR is completed, products in real-time quantitative PCR are quantitated as they accumulate. This is accomplished by including in the PCR reaction an oligonucleotide probe that anneals specifically between the forward and reverse PCR primers, and contains two fluorescent dyes. A reporter dye (e.g., FAM or JOE, obtained from either PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, Calif. or Integrated DNA Technologies Inc., Coralville, Iowa) is attached to the 5′ end of the probe and a quencher dye (e.g., TAMRA, obtained from either PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif., Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, Calif. or Integrated DNA Technologies Inc., Coralville, Iowa) is attached to the 3′ end of the probe. When the probe and dyes are intact, reporter dye emission is quenched by the proximity of the 3′ quencher dye. During amplification, annealing of the probe to the target sequence creates a substrate that can be cleaved by the 5′-exonuclease activity of Taq polymerase. During the extension phase of the PCR amplification cycle, cleavage of the probe by Taq polymerase releases the reporter dye from the remainder of the probe (and hence from the quencher moiety) and a sequence-specific fluorescent signal is generated. With each cycle, additional reporter dye molecules are cleaved from their respective probes, and the fluorescence intensity is monitored at regular intervals by laser optics built into the ABI PRISMTM 7700 Sequence Detection System. In each assay, a series of parallel reactions containing serial dilutions of mRNA from untreated control samples generates a standard curve that is used to quantitate the percent inhibition after antisense oligonucleotide treatment of test samples.
Prior to quantitative PCR analysis, primer-probe sets specific to the target gene being measured are evaluated for their ability to be “multiplexed” with a GAPDH amplification reaction. In multiplexing, both the target gene and the internal standard gene GAPDH are amplified concurrently in a single sample. In this analysis, mRNA isolated from untreated cells is serially diluted. Each dilution is amplified in the presence of primer-probe sets specific for GAPDH only, target gene only (“single-plexing”), or both (multiplexing). Following PCR amplification, standard curves of GAPDH and target mRNA signal as a function of dilution are generated from both the single-plexed and multiplexed samples. If both the slope and correlation coefficient of the GAPDH and target signals generated from the multiplexed samples fall within 10% of their corresponding values generated from the single-plexed samples, the primer-probe set specific for that target is deemed multiplexable. Other methods of PCR are also known in the art.
PCR reagents were obtained from Invitrogen Corporation, (Carlsbad, Calif.). RT-PCR reactions were carried out by adding 20 μL PCR cocktail (2.5×PCR buffer (—MgCl2), 6.6 mM MgCl2, 375 μM each of DATP, dCTP, dCTP and dGTP, 375 nM each of forward primer and reverse primer, 125 nM of probe, 4 Units RNAse inhibitor, 1.25 Units PLATINUM® Taq, 5 Units MuLV reverse transcriptase, and 2.5×ROX dye) to 96-well plates containing 30 μL total RNA solution. The RT reaction was carried out by incubation for 30 minutes at 48° C. Following a 10 minute incubation at 95° C. to activate the PLATINUM® Taq, 40 cycles of a two-step PCR protocol were carried out: 95° C. for 15 seconds (denaturation) followed by 60° C. for 1.5 minutes (annealing/extension).
Gene target quantities obtained by real time RT-PCR are normalized using either the expression level of GAPDH, a gene whose expression is constant, or by quantifying total RNA using RiboGreenTM (Molecular Probes, Inc. Eugene, Oreg.). GAPDH expression is quantified by real time RT-PCR, by being run simultaneously with the target, multiplexing, or separately. Total RNA is quantified using RiboGreenTM RNA quantification reagent from Molecular Probes. Methods of RNA quantification by RiboGreenTM are taught in Jones, L. J., et al, (Analytical Biochemistry, 1998, 265, 368–374).
In this assay, 170 μL of RiboGreenTM working reagent (RiboGreenTM reagent diluted 1:350 in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5) is pipetted into a 96-well plate containing 30 μL purified, cellular RNA. The plate is read in a CytoFluor 4000 (PE Applied Biosystems) with excitation at 480 nm and emission at 520 nm.
Probes and primers to human kinesin-like 1 were designed to hybridize to a human kinesin-like 1 sequence, using published sequence information (GenBank accession number NM—004523.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO:3). For human kinesin-like 1 the PCR primers were:

    forward primer: GTGGTGAGATGCAGACCAT=TAAT (SEQ ID NO: 4)
    reverse primer: CTTTTCGTACAGGATCACATTCTACTATTG (SEQ ID NO: 5) and the PCR probe was: FAM-TGGCAGAGCGGAAAGCTAGCGC-TAMRA
    ( ) where FAM is the fluorescent dye and TAMRA is the quencher dye. For human GAPDH the PCR primers were:
    forward primer: GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC(SEQ ID NO:7)
    reverse primer: GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC (SEQ ID NO:8) and the PCR probe was: 5′ JOE-CAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAGCC-TAMRA 3′ (SEQ ID NO: 9) where JOE is the fluorescent reporter dye and TAMRA is the quencher dye.


Example 14
Northern Blot Analysis of Kinesin-like 1 mRNA Levels
Eighteen hours after antisense treatment, cell monolayers were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed in 1 mL RNAZOLTM (TEL-TEST “B” Inc., Friendswood, Tex.). Total RNA was prepared following manufacturer's recommended protocols. Twenty micrograms of total RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis through 1.2% agarose gels containing 1.1% formaldehyde using a MOPS buffer system (AMRESCO, Inc. Solon, Ohio). RNA was transferred from the gel to HYBONDTM-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) by overnight capillary transfer using a Northern/Southern Transfer buffer system (TEL-TEST “B” Inc., Friendswood, Tex.). RNA transfer was confirmed by UV visualization. Membranes were fixed by UV cross-linking using a STRATALINKERTM UV Crosslinker 2400 (Stratagene, Inc, La Jolla, Calif.) and then probed using QUICKHYBTM hybridization solution (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) using manufacturer's recommendations for stringent conditions.
To detect human kinesin-like 1, a human kinesin-like 1 specific probe was prepared by PCR using the forward primer GTGGTGAGATGCAGACCATTTAAT (SEQ ID NO: 4) and the reverse primer CTTTTCGTACAGGATCACATTCTACTATTG (SEQ ID NO: 5). To normalize for variations in loading and transfer efficiency membranes were stripped and probed for human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) RNA (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.).
Hybridized membranes were visualized and quantitated using a PHOSPHORIMAGERTM and IMAGEQUANTTM Software V3.3 (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). Data was normalized to GAPDH levels in untreated controls.
Example 15
Antisense Inhibition of Human Kinesin-like 1 Expression by Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE Wings and a Deoxy Gap
In accordance with the present invention, a series of oligonucleotides were designed to target different regions of the human kinesin-like 1 RNA, using published sequences (GenBank accession number NM—004523.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 1. “Target site” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 1 are chimeric oligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides in length, composed of a central “gap” region consisting of ten 2′-deoxynucleotides, which is flanked on both sides (5′ and 3′ directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”. The wings are composed of 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-MOE) nucleotides. The internucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorathioate (P═S) throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines. The compounds were analyzed for their effect on human kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels by quantitative real-time PCR as described in other examples herein. Data are averages from two experiments in which T-24 cells were treated with the antisense oligonucleotides of the present invention. If present, “N.D.” indicates “no data”.







TABLE 1







Inhibition of human kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels by chimeric


phosphorothioate oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE wings and


a deoxy gap
















TARGET
TARGET

%
SEQ ID



ISIS #
REGION
SEQ ID NO
SITE
SEQUENCE
INHIB
NO

















183876
Coding
3
2284
tgttgactatatccttagat
44
11



 


183877
Coding
3
1838
tctgctgctaatgattgttc
79
12


 


183878
Coding
3
1771
ctggaatagatgtgagagat
78
13


 


183879
Coding
3
875
aaagtcaacagggattgatt
69
14


 


183880
Coding
3
2641
gatcaagaaaaatgttatgc
62
15


 


183881
Coding
3
1753
atccaagtgctactgtagta
86
16


 


183882
Coding
3
1027
tttcctcaagattgagagat
78
17


 


183883
Coding
3
2202
caaagcacagaatctctctg
68
18


 


183884
Coding
3
2172
cattaacttgcaaagttcct
58
19


 


183885
Coding
3
1545
atccagtttggaatggagac
43
20


 


183886
Coding
3
2881
ttagcatcattaacagctca
72
21


 


183887
Coding
3
1312
taaacaactctgtaacccta
41
22


 


183888
Coding
3
528
agaaacatcagatgatggat
82
23


 


183889
Coding
3
1898
agtgaacttagaagatcagt
66
24


 


183890
Coding
3
2849
ttcagctgatcaaggagatg
64
25


 


183891
Coding
3
840
ccgagctctcttatcaacag
81
26


 


183892
Coding
3
1581
agcttctgcattgtgttggt
76
27


 


183893
3′UTR
3
3597
attcaactgaatttacagta
56
28


 


183894
Coding
3
3144
cagaggtaatctgctctttg
66
29


 


183895
Coding
3
1341
acactggtcaagttcatttt
74
30


 


183896
Coding
3
1456
cagtactttccaaagctgat
40
31


 


183897
Coding
3
2119
cagttaggtttccacattgc
77
32


 


183898
3′UTR
3
3707
ctactttatatgaaaactag
30
33


 


183899
Coding
3
1053
atgagcatattccaatgtac
76
34


 


183900
Coding
3
536
agtctctcagaaacatcaga
67
35


 


183901
Coding
3
394
taccagccaagggatcctct
79
36


 


183902
Coding
3
489
ttcattatagatctccaaca
39
37


 


183903
Coding
3
1619
ttaaacagactattcaggtt
64
38


 


183904
Coding
3
2960
tcttcagtatactgccccag
72
39


 


183905
Coding
3
2301
actgtgaaaagtcattttgt
48
40


 


183906
Coding
3
1159
caagatctcgttttaaacgt
76
41


 


183907
Coding
3
308
tggccatacgcaaagatagt
34
42


 


183908
Coding
3
2260
gctgtatattttcctggaca
76
43


 


183909
Coding
3
1659
ttgctttgagctgccatcct
0
44


 


183910
Coding
3
2333
gagaagccatcagaatcagc
71
45


 


183911
Coding
3
1023
ctcaagattgagagatgcag
79
46


 


183912
Coding
3
2620
gtttctcatgagctgcctta
71
47









As shown in Table 1, SEQ ID NOs 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39, 41, 43, 45, 46 and 47 demonstrated at least 61% inhibition of human kinesin-like 1 expression in this assay and are therefore preferred. The target sites to which these preferred sequences are complementary are herein referred to as “preferred target regions” and are therefore preferred sites for targeting by compounds of the present invention.







TABLE 2







Sequence and position of preferred target


regions identified in kinesin-like 1


















REV









COMP



SITE
TARGET
TARGET

OF SEQ

SEQ


ID
SEQ ID NO
SITE
SEQUENCE
ID
ACTIVE IN
ID NO





99215
3
1838
gaacaatcattagcagcaga
12
H. sapiens
48



 


99216
3
1771
atctctcacatctattccag
13
H. sapiens
49


 


99217
3
 875
aatcaatccctgttgacttt
14
H. sapiens
50


 


99218
3
2641
gcataacatttttcttgatc
15
H. sapiens
51


 


99219
3
1753
tactacagtagcacttggat
16
H. sapiens
52


 


99220
3
1027
atctctcaatcttgaggaaa
17
H. sapiens
53


 


99221
3
2202
cagagagattctgtgctttg
18
H. sapiens
54


 


99224
3
2881
tgagctgttaatgatgctaa
21
H. sapiens
55


 


99226
3
528
atccatcatctgatgtttct
23
H. sapiens
56


 


99227
3
1898
actgatcttctaagttcact
24
H. sapiens
57


 


99228
3
2849
catctccttgatcagctgaa
25
H. sapiens
58


 


99229
3
 840
ctgttgataagagagctcgg
26
H. sapiens
59


 


99230
3
1581
accaacacaatgcagaagct
27
H. sapiens
60


 


99232
3
3144
caaagagcagattacctctg
29
H. sapiens
61


 


99233
3
1341
aaaatgaacttgaccagtgt
30
H sapiens
62


 


99235
3
2119
gcaatgtggaaacctaactg
32
H. sapiens
63


 


99237
3
1053
gtacattggaatatgctcat
34
H. sapiens
64


 


99238
3
 536
tctgatgtttctgagagact
35
H. sapiens
65


 


99239
3
 394
agaggatcccttggctggta
36
H. sapiens
66


 


99241
3
1619
aacctgaatagtctgtttaa
38
H. sapiens
67


 


99242
3
2960
ctggggcagtatactgaaga
39
H. sapiens
68


 


99244
3
1159
acgtttaaaacgagatcttg
41
H. sapiens
69


 


99246
3
2260
tgtccaggaaaatatacagc
43
H. sapiens
70


 


99248
3
2333
gctgattctgatggcttctc
45
H. sapiens
71


 


99249
3
1023
ctgcatctctcaatcttgag
46
H. sapiens
72


 


99250
3
2620
taaggcagctcatgagaaac
47
H. sapiens
73









As these “preferred target regions” have been found by experimentation to be open to, and accessible for, hybridization with the antisense compounds of the present invention, one of skill in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain, using no more than routine experimentation, further embodiments of the invention that encompass other compounds that specifically hybridize to these sites and consequently inhibit the expression of kinesin-like 1.
Example 16
Western Blot Analysis of Kinesin-like 1 Protein Levels
Western blot analysis (immunoblot analysis) is carried out using standard methods. Cells are harvested 16–20 h after oligonucleotide treatment, washed once with PBS, suspended in Laemmli buffer (100 ul/well), boiled for 5 minutes and loaded on a 16% SDS-PAGE gel. Gels are run for 1.5 hours at 150 V, and transferred to membrane for western blotting. Appropriate primary antibody directed to kinesin-like 1 is used, with a radiolabeled or fluorescently labeled secondary antibody directed against the primary antibody species. Bands are visualized using a PHOSPHORIMAGERTM (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale Calif.).
Example 17
Cell Cycle Assay and Flow Cytometry Analysis
The measurement of the DNA content of cells can provide a great deal of information about the cell cycle, and consequently the effect on the cell cycle of added stimuli (e.g. transfected genes or drug treatment). Therefore, in a further embodiment of the invention, antisense compounds were analyzed for their effects on the cell cycle (DNA content) by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis in MCF-7, T47D and HMEC cells. This analysis is based on the principle that the DNA content of a cell changes through the progression of the cell cycle and that this change can be quantitated by staining the DNA and measuring the amount of stain over a period of time. Flow cytometry (FACS) is a means of measuring certain physical and chemical characteristics, such as the DNA content, of cells or particles as they travel in suspension one by one past a sensing point.
When cells reached 70% confluency, they were treated with antisense oligonucleotide (ISIS 183881, SEQ ID NO: 16) or a control oligonucleotide, ISIS 29848, a 20-mer random oligonucleotide (NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN, wherein each N can be A, C, G or T; herein incorporated as SEQ ID NO: 74) as described in other examples herein. For cells grown in 96-well plates, wells were washed once with 100 μL OPTI-MEMTM-1 reduced-serum medium (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and then treated with 130 μL of OPTI-MEMTM-1 containing 3.75 μg/mL LIPOFECTINTTM (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) and the desired concentration of oligonucleotide. After 4–7 hours of treatment, the medium was replaced with fresh medium. Cells were harvested 16–24 hours after oligonucleotide treatment and the growth medium (including floating cells) were transferred to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) tubes. The remaining cells were detached from the plates with gentle tapping and were washed with 250 ul PBS/5 mM EDTA. Following the wash, 250 ul trypsin was added to the cells and incubated at room temperature for 5 minutes. These cells were then added to the FACS tubes. Tubes were spun in a tabletop centrifuge at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes and the supernatant was decanted.
Cells were then washed with 2 ml PBS/5 mM EDTA and the tubes were spun again at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes with the supernatant being decanted after centrifugation. Cells were then resuspended with 0.4 ml PBS/5 mM EDTA and briefly vortexed. Following resuspension and vortexing, 1.6 mls cold ethanol was added while the tube was again gently vortexed.
Cells were stored at −20° C. overnight. The following day, tubes were spun at 2000 rpm and the supernatant was decanted. Cells were then washed with 2 mls PBS/5 mM EDTA and resuspended with 0.15 ml PI mix (100 ug/ml propidium iodide, 1:200 RNAse cocktail; Ambion, Inc. (Austin, Tex.), Catalog Number # 2286). Samples were then run on a flow cytometer and the data were analyzed via the ModFitTM algorithm (AMPL Software Pty Ltd, Turramurra, Australia) to determine the distribution of cells in subG1, G1-, S- and G2/M-phases of mitosis. The percent of cells arrested in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle for each cell line is shown in Table 3. Data are compared to untreated controls (UTC) and the control antisense oligonucleotide, ISIS 29848. Data are an average of two assays.







TABLE 3a







Percent Arrest in G2/M phase of the cell cycle by ISIS 183881









Percent G2/M Arrest














Control;




Cell line
UTC
ISIS 29848
ISIS 183881
















MCF-7
7
8
23



T47D
15
20
45



HMEC
14
15
28










These data indicate that ISIS 183881 was able to arrest cancer cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle.

This experiment was repeated with the cancer cell lines; data are shown in Table 3b.








TABLE 3b







Percent Arrest in G2/M phase of the cell cycle by ISIS 183881









Percent G2/M Arrest














Control;




Cell line
UTC
ISIS 29848
ISIS 183881
















MCF-7
13
15
34



T47D
15
20
41










It was also demonstrated that this antisense compound had no effect on cell polyploidy. These data are shown in Table 4.








TABLE 4







Percent Polyploidy after treatment with ISIS 183881









Percent Polyploidy














Control;




Cell line
UTC
ISIS 29848
ISIS 183881
















MCF-7
12
13
14



T47D
19
23
20



HMEC
3
4
5










These data indicate that the antisense compound, ISIS 183881 did not induce the production of multiple nucleii, but in fact arrested cells in mitosis.

Treatment of T47D cells with ISIS 183891 also caused rounding of cells, which was not seen with a control oligonucleotide or in untreated controls.
Example 18
Dose Responsiveness and Time Course of the Arrest of T47D Cells in G2/M by Treatment with Antisense to Kinesin-like 1
T47D cells were cultured and treated with ISIS 183891 as described above, using oligonucleotide concentrations of 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 nM. At these doses, the percentage of cells in G2/M was approximately 23%, 40%, 47%, 50% and 54%, respectively.
In a time course using 150 nM ISIS 183891, the percentage of T47D cells in G2M was observed to increase from 20% at time 0 to 55% at 24 hours after treatment, 50% at 48 hours and 32% at 72 hours.
Example 19
G2/M Arrest by Antisense Knockdown of Kinesin-like 1 Compared to Knockdown of Other Genes in Breast Cancer Cell Lines or Normal Breast Cell Lines
Several breast cell lines were treated with an antisense inhibitor of kinesin-like 1 or with an antisense inhibitor of one of 19 other randomly selected cellular genes. In the MCF7 human breast cancer cell line, the percentage of cells in G2/M after treatment with antisense to kinesin-like 1 (ISIS 183881) was over triple the percentage of control-treated cells in G2M. In contrast, cells treated with antisense inhibitors of the other genes showed no increase or an increase of less than 1.3 fold.
In HMEC (normal human mammary epithelial) cells the percentage of cells in G2/M after treatment with antisense to kinesin-like 1 (ISIS 183881) was increased to approximately 1.5 fold the percentage of control-treated cells in G2M. In contrast, cells treated with antisense inhibitors of the other genes showed no increase or an increase of less than 1.3 fold.
In T47D human breast carcinoma cells, the percentage of cells in G2/M after treatment with antisense to kinesin-like 1 (ISIS 183881) was increased to approximately 2.1 fold the percentage of control-treated cells in G2M. In contrast, cells treated with antisense inhibitors of the other genes showed no increase or an increase of less than 1.2 fold.
Example 20
Expression of Kinesin-like 1 in Transformed vs. Primary Cultured Cells
Relative levels of kinesin-like 1 RNA were determined by RT-PCR in 14 transformed human cell lines and 5 primary (non-transformed) human cell cultures. Relative kinesin-like RNA levels in each cell type were normalized to levels in T47D cells. Results are shown in Table 5.







TABLE 5







Relative kinesin-like 1 RNA levels in cultured cells













Kinesin-like 1





RNA level (as




Transformed
% of levels in T47D


Cell name
Cell type
or primary
cells)





T47D
Breast
Transformed
100%



adenocarcinoma


T47Dp53
Breast
Transformed
38



adenocarcinoma


MCF7
Breast carcinoma
Transformed
100


A549
Lung carcinoma
Transformed
125


769-P
Kidney epithelial
Transformed
82



carcinoma


T24
Bladder carcinoma
Transformed
142


HepG2
Liver Carcinoma
Transformed
34


Hep3B
Hepatocellular
Transformed
70



carcinoma


HeLa
Cervical carcinoma
Transformed
83


SK-OV-3
Ovarian carcinoma
Transformed
37


DU145
Prostate carcinoma
Transformed
131


PC3
Prostate cancer
Transformed
52


U87-MG
Glioblastoma
Transformed
92


Jurkat
T-cell leukemia
Transformed
130


Huvec
Normal vascular
Primary
80



endothelium


HMEC
Normal mammary
Primary
20



epithelium


PreD
Normal pre-adipocyte
Primary
20


D3
Normal differentiated
Primary
1



adipocyte


Dendritic
Normal dendritic
Primary
undetectable









Example 21
Kinesin-like 1 Protein Expression in Cultured Cells
Levels of kinesin-like 1 protein were measured in cultured cells by western blotting and normalized to GAPDH. Results are shown in Table 6 relative to kinesin-like 1 levels in T47D cells.







TABLE 6







Kinesin-like 1 protein levels in cultured cells













Relative


Cell

Transformed
kinesin-like 1


name
Cell type
or primary
protein levels





T47D
Breast adenocarcinoma
Transformed
100%


T47Dp53
Breast adenocarcinoma
Transformed
141


MCF7
Breast carcinoma
Transformed
141


U266
Multiple myeloma
Transformed
97


769-P
Kidney epithelial carcinoma
Transformed
58


T24
Bladder carcinoma
Transformed
151


Hep3B
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Transformed
69


HeLa
Cervical carcinoma
Transformed
73


SK-OV-3
Ovarian carcinoma
Transformed
61


DU145
Prostate carcinoma
Transformed
51


PC3
Prostate cancer
Transformed
107


U87-MG
Glioblastoma
Transformed
116


Huvec
Normal vascular endothelium
Primary
54









Example 22
Antisense Inhibition of Kinesin-like 1 Expression Arrests Many Cell Types in G2/M
A panel of cell types were treated with ISIS 183891, an antisense inhibitor of kinesin-like 1, or with an unrelated control oligonucleotide, and the percentage of cells in G2/M was assayed, using methods described in previous examples. Results are shown in Table 7 as approximate percentage of cells in G2/M.







TABLE 7







Antisense inhibition of kinesin-like 1 causes G2/M arrest














% of cells






in G2/M
% of cells in



Cell

(control
G2/M (ISIS



name
Cell type
oligo)
183891)
















T47D
Breast
20
32




adenocarcinoma



T47Dp53
Breast
13
32




adenocarcinoma



MCF7
Breast carcinoma
14
25



MDA-
Breast carcinoma
14
47



MB231



A549
Lung carcinoma
15
90



T24
Bladder carcinoma
15
32



DU145
Prostate carcinoma
16
32



PC3
Prostate carcinoma
17
91



MiaPaca
Pancreatic
16
47




carcinoma



Panc1
Pancreatic
18
52




carcinoma



HeLa
Cervical carcinoma
20
60



SK-OV-3
Ovarian carcinoma
27
68



U87-MG
Glioblastoma
16
42



Hep3B
Hepatocellular
30
54




carcinoma



769-P
Kidney carcinoma
46
69



Huvec
Normal human
16
47




vascular




endothelium



HMEC
Normal mammary
31
51




epithelium










Example 23
Inhibition of Kinesin-like 1 mRNA Expression in MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells is Dose-dependent
MCF7 cells were cultured as described in previous examples and treated with ISIS 183881 at concentrations of 30 nM and 100 nM. At 30 nM ISIS 183881, kinesin-like 1 expression as measured by RT-PCR was reduced by almost 80% compared to untreated control. At 100 nM ISIS 183881, kinesin-like 1 expression was reduced by approximately 90% compared to untreated control. The IC50 was 20 nM. In contrast, kinesin-like 1 in cells treated with an unrelated control oligonucleotide was not reduced by more than 10% at either concentration of oligonucleotide.
Example 24
Effect of kinesin-like 1 Antisense Oligonucleotides on Kinesin-like 1 mRNA Levels and G2/M arrest in T47D Human Breast Carcinoma Cells
The kinesin-like 1 antisense oligonucleotides ISIS 183881 and ISIS 183891 were tested for dose-dependent effects on kinesin-like 1 expression and G2/M arrest in T47D human breast carcinoma cells. The negative control oligonucleotide used, ISIS 335395 (CCAGGCCTTCTATTCACAAG; SEQ ID NO: 75), is an 8-base mismatch of ISIS 183891.
Cells were treated with oligonucleotides for 24 hours at concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 nM. Dose-dependent reduction in kinesin-like 1 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR and results are shown in Table 8.







TABLE 8







Antisense inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression in T47D


breast carcinoma cells









Percent inhibition after



treatment with:












Oligonucleotide dose
ISIS
ISIS
ISIS



(nM) ↓
335395
183881
183891
















0
 0
0%
 0



0.5
34
14
12



1
30
30
21



5
30
20
41



10
28
24
46



25
14
42
53



50
13
43
61



100
20
40
75










Inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression was dose dependent.

The percentage of cells in G2/M was also determined for these treated cells. Data are shown in Table 9.








TABLE 9







Percentage of T47D breast carcinoma cells


cells in G2/M after inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression











Oligo
Percent of cells in G2/M after treatment with:
















dose
ISIS 335395

ISIS 183881

ISIS 183891
















(nM) ↓
24 hr
48 hr
24 hr
48 hr
24 hr
48 hr







 0
13
30
13
30
13
30



25
13
31
20
32
26
43



50
14
31
21
39
32
53



100 
16
30
28
48
34
54










Example 25
Inhibition of Kinesin-like 1 Protein Expression in T47D Cells
T47 cells were cultured as in previous examples. Cells were treated with ISIS 183891 at 200 nM for 48 hours. Kinesin-like 1 protein levels were quantitated by western blot analysis using mouse anti-human Eg5 (kinesin-like 1) antibody (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego Calif., catalog #611187) and normalized to G3PDH. Treatment with ISIS 183891 reduced kinesin-like 1 protein levels by 85%.
Example 26
Kinesin-like 1 Antisense Oligonucleotide Inhibits T47D Cell Proliferation
T47D cells were cultured as in previous examples. Cells were treated with the kinesin-like 1 antisense oligonucleotide ISIS. 183891 and an unrelated control oligonucleotide at 200 nM for 24, 48 or 72 hours. Results are shown in Table 10.







TABLE 10







Antisense to kinesin-like 1 (ISIS 183891) inhibits


T47D cell proliferation


(expressed in relative cell number)














Control




Time ↓
Untreated control
oligonucleotide
ISIS 183891
















24 hr
50
60
30



48 hr
85
100
28



72 hr
220
200
30










Example 27
Effect of Kinesin-like 1 Antisense Oligonucleotides on Kinesin-like 1 mRNA Levels and G2/M Arrest in MDA-MB231 Human Breast Carcinoma Cells
The kinesin-like 1 antisense oligonucleotides ISIS 183881 and ISIS 183891 were tested for dose-dependent effects on kinesin-like 1 expression and G2/M arrest in MDA-MB231 human breast carcinoma cells. The negative control oligonucleotide used, ISIS 335395 (CCAGGCCTTCTATTCACAAG; SEQ ID NO: 75), is an 8-base mismatch of ISIS 183891.
Cells were treated with oligonucleotides for 24 hours at concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50 arid 100 nM. Dose-dependent reduction in kinesin-like 1 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR and results are shown in Table 11.







TABLE 11







Antisense inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression


in MDA-MB231 breast carcinoma cells









Percent inhibition after



treatment with:












Oligonucleotide dose
ISIS
ISIS
ISIS



(nM) ↓
335395
183881
183891
















0
0
0
0



0.5
4
5
0



1
0
4
4



5
18
18
34



10
5
2
43



25
16
36
54



50
7
61
73



100
18
63
69










Inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression was dose dependent.

The percentage of cells in G2/M was also determined for these treated cells. Data are shown in Table 12.








TABLE 12







Percentage of MDA-MB231 breast carcinoma cells


cells in G2/M after inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression











Oligo
Percent of cells in G2/M after treatment with:
















dose
ISIS 335395

ISIS 183881

ISIS 183891
















(nM) ↓
24 hr
48 hr
24 hr
48 hr
24 hr
48 hr







 0
13
15
13
15
13
15



25
11
15
23
24
32
37



50
 9
14
35
30
34
46



100 
11
15
44
48
30
40










Example 28
Effect of kinesin-like 1 Antisense Oligonucleotides on Kinesin-like 1 mRNA Levels and G2/M Arrest in HeLa Human Cervical Carcinoma Cells
The kinesin-like 1 antisense oligonucleotides ISIS 183881 and ISIS 183891 were tested for dose-dependent effects on kinesin-like 1 expression and G2/M arrest in HeLa human cervical carcinoma cells. The negative control oligonucleotide used, ISIS 335395 (CCAGGCCCTATTCACAAG; SEQ ID NO: 75), is an 8-base mismatch of ISIS 183891.
Cells were treated with oligonucleotides for 24 hours at concentrations of 0, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 nM. Dose-dependent reduction in kinesin-like 1 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR and results are shown in Table 13.







TABLE 13







Antisense inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression


in HeLa cervical carcinoma cells









Percent inhibition after



treatment with:












Oligonucleotide dose
ISIS
ISIS
ISIS



(nM) ↓
335395
183881
183891
















0
0
0
0



0.5
0
3
12



1
0
0
0



5
0
1
30



10
5
2
33



25
17
46
61



50
5
65
84



100
0
56
84










Inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression was dose dependent.

The percentage of cells in G2/M was also determined for these treated cells. Data are shown in Table 14.








TABLE 14







Percentage of HeLa cervical carcinoma cells


cells in G2/M after inhibition of kinesin-like 1 expression












Approx. percentage of cells in G2/M




Oligo
after treatment with:
















dose
ISIS 335395

ISIS 183881

ISIS 183891
















(nM) ↓
24 hr
48 hr
24 hr
48 hr
24 hr
48 hr







 0
17
15
17
15
17
15



25
17
16
16
14
56
39



50
18
17
23
16
70
67



100 
16
17
48
33
68
68










Example 29
Kinesin-like 1 Expression in Tumor and Normal Tissues from Individual Patients
Kinesin-like 1 expression was compared between normal and tumor tissues from over 240 individuals using BD CLONTECHTM Cancer Profiling Array I (Palo Alto Calif.) according to manufacturer's instructions. This array contains matched pairs of cDNA (normal and tumor, each pair from a single patient) spotted side by side on a nylon membrane. A 32P-labeled probe (nucleotides 1902–3152 of SEQ ID NO: 77) for kinesin-like 1 was hybridized to the array according to manufacturer's instructions.
Results are shown in tabular form in Table 15.







TABLE 15







Human kinesin-like 1 expression in tumor vs normal tissues













Detected in Normal
Detected in Tumor




# Sample
Tissue
Tissue
>2 fold in Tumor














Tumor type
Pairs
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent

















Breast
53
25
47
41
77
26
49


Colon
38
27
71
34
89
10
26


Kidney
21
3
14
5
24
1
5


Lung
21
7
33
15
71
12
57


Ovary
16
6
38
15
94
9
56


Rectum
19
14
74
16
84
5
26


Stomach
28
15
54
22
79
11
39


Thyroid
6
4
67
4
67
1
17


Uterus
44
14
32
33
75
23
52









Thus it can be seen that kinesin-like 1 expression is increased twofold in approximately 25–60% of breast, colon, lung, ovary, rectum, stomach and uterus tumor samples, and also (to a lesser extent) in kidney and thyroid tumor samples.

Example 30
Antisense Inhibition of Human Kinesin-like 1 Expression by Additional Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE Wings and a Deoxy Gap
In accordance with the present invention, a series of oligonucleotides were designed to target different regions of the human kinesin-like 1 RNA, using published sequences (GenBank accession number NM—004523.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3; GenBank accession number NT—030059, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 76; GenBank accession number NM—004523.2, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 77; GenBank accession number BL050421.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 78; and GenBank accession number BX103943.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 79). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 16. “Target site” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 16 are chimeric oligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides in length, composed of a central “gap” region consisting often 2′-deoxynucleotides, which is flanked on both sides (5′ and 3′ directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”. The wings are composed of 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-MOE) nucleotides. The internucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines. The compounds were analyzed for their effect on human kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels by quantitative real-time PCR as described in other examples herein. Data are averages from two experiments in which T-24 cells were treated with the antisense oligonucleotides of the present invention. As noted, some of the compounds were designed to be fully complementary to more than one animal species (human, mouse, and/or rat).







TABLE 16







Inhibition of human kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels


by chimeric phosphorothioate oligonucleotides


having 2′-MOE wings and a deoxy gap

















Target



SEQ




Isis

SEQ ID
Target

%
ID


No
Region
NO
site
Sequence
inhib
NO
Species


















183881
Coding
3
1753
atccaagtgctactgtagta
89
16
Human



 


183883
Coding
3
2202
caaagcacagaatctctctg
81
18
Human,









Mouse


 


183891
Coding
3
840
ccgagctctcttatcaacag
86
26
Human


 


285688
Coding
3
212
gctccaaacaccatatcaaa
45
80
Human,









Mouse


 


285689
Coding
3
217
tagatgctccaaacaccata
38
81
Human,









Mouse


 


285694
Coding
3
936
tttagattctcgataaggaa
60
82
Human,









Mouse


 


285695
Coding
3
941
gttagtttagattctcgata
73
83
Human,









Mouse


 


285696
Coding
3
949
ggattctagttagtttagat
43
84
Human,









Mouse


 


285698
Coding
3
989
attatagatgttcttgtacg
73
85
Human,









Mouse


 


285699
Coding
3
995
gttgcaattatagatgttct
88
86
Human,









Mouse


 


285700
Coding
3
1032
cagagtttcctcaagattga
45
87
Human,









Mouse


 


285701
Coding
3
1037
gtactcagagtttcctcaag
75
88
Human,









Mouse


 


285702
Coding
3
1042
ccaatgtactcagagtttcc
58
89
Human,









Mouse


 


285703
Coding
3
1047
atattccaatgtactcagag
37
90
Human,









Mouse


 


285704
Coding
3
1052
tgagcatattccaatgtact
73
91
Human,









Mouse


 


285705
Coding
3
1122
ctccttaataagagcttttt
60
92
Human,









Mouse


 


285706
Coding
3
1127
gtatactccttaataagagc
58
93
Human,









Mouse


 


285708
Coding
3
1187
tacactccatttttctcacg
9
94
Human,









Mouse


 


285712
Coding
3
1346
gatttacactggtcaagttc
58
95
Human,









Mouse


 


285713
Coding
3
1351
ggtcagatttacactggtca
89
96
Human,









Mouse


 


285714
Coding
3
1356
ttgcaggtcagatttacact
77
97
Human,









Mouse


 


344870
Coding
3
67
tgcatctcaccaccacctgg
76
98
Human,









Mouse


 


344871
Intron 1
76
10298
gaagtaaaagcaggtagatg
19
99
Human


 


344872
Intron 1
76
12002
acctgagttcatttttccca
70
100
Human


 


344873
Intron 9
76
28627
ccgtatactcctacacaaga
71
101
Human


 


344874
Intron 16
76
46149
aaaatgcatccaacattctt
73
102
Human


 


344875
Intron 17
76
51266
gaaatccatcagtctagata
28
103
Human


 


344876
Intron20:E
76
57643
catccacatcctaaaagaag
41
104
Human



xon 21



junction


 


344877
Intron
76
61939
ggatacaactagggttagat
50
105
Human



6a:Exon



22a



junction


 


344878
5′ UTR
77
13
tgcgtggcctggaggaccga
51
106
Human


 


344879
5′ UTR
77
39
ggagtctccctggtactctc
22
107
Human


 


344880
Start codon
77
126
gccatgacggtccccgccaa
69
108
Human


 


344881
Coding
3
79
aattaaatggtctgcatctc
45
109
Human


 


344882
Coding
3
136
cttttcgtacaggatcacat
62
110
Human


 


344883
Coding
3
245
acacttcggtaaacatcaat
25
111
Human,









Mouse


 


344884
Coding
3
251
caaacaacacttcggtaaac
31
112
Human,









Mouse


 


344885
Coding
3
256
ttggacaaacaacacttcgg
68
113
Human,









Mouse


 


344886
Coding
3
281
tagcccataataacttcatc
35
114
Human,









Mouse


 


344887
Coding
3
286
aattatagcccataataact
9
115
Human,









Mouse


 


344888
Coding
3
329
aaagtttttccagtgccagt
78
116
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344889
Coding
3
334
ttgtaaaagtttttccagtg
50
117
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344890
Coding
3
346
tttcaccttccattgtaaaa
6
118
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344891
Coding
3
351
tgacctttcaccttccattg
46
119
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344892
Coding
3
356
ttaggtgacctttcaccttc
51
120
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344893
Coding
3
361
cttcattaggtgacctttca
39
121
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344894
Coding
3
405
acgtggaattataccagcca
93
122
Human,









Rat


 


344895
Coding
3
428
ttctcaaaaatttgatgaag
22
123
Human,









Mouse


 


344896
Coding
3
437
tcagtaagtttctcaaaaat
9
124
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344897
Coding
3
442
cattatcagtaagtttctca
38
125
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344898
Coding
3
662
gcagttgtcctttttgctgc
78
126
Human,









Mouse


 


344899
Coding
3
758
acaagctcttctccatcaat
45
127
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344900
Coding
3
763
ttttaacaagctcttctcca
76
128
Human,









Mouse, Rat


 


344901
Coding
3
805
tgttttcacttcctgcaaga
44
129
Human,









Rat


 


344902
Coding
3
1218
actcatgactctaaaatttt
59
130
Human


 


344903
Coding
3
1306
actctgtaaccctattcagc
70
131
Human


 


344904
Coding
3
1628
tccatattattaaacagact
36
132
Human,









Mouse


 


344905
Coding
3
1781
gacacattttctggaataga
69
133
Human,









Mouse


 


344906
Coding
3
1876
tgagtacattaatcaattcc
41
134
Human


 


344907
Coding
3
2130
cttcaggtcttcagttaggt
62
135
Human,









Mouse


 


344908
Coding
3
2135
attgtcttcaggtcttcagt
25
136
Human,









Mouse


 


344909
Stop codon
3
3173
caagtgaattaaaggttgat
25
137
Human


 


344910
3′ UTR
3
3598
aattcaactgaatttacagt
10
138
Human


 


344911
3′ UTR
3
3641
caaagtgaactatagggatg
30
139
Human


 


344912
3′ UTR
77
4125
taaaattctgactactgaaa
0
140
Human


 


344913
3′ UTR
77
4180
ttgttgacagtgattttaga
48
141
Human


 


344914
3′ UTR
77
4211
taaaggagggatacaactag
31
142
Human


 


344915
3′ UTR
77
4351
agtcagatgtctgggtggtc
61
143
Human


 


344916
3′ UTR
77
4367
gtggcacagagccattagtc
68
144
Human


 


344917
3′ UTR
77
4548
tcctaagggttaagatttga
47
145
Human


 


344918
3′ UTR
77
4599
tgaaacatctcaacttccag
22
146
Human


 


344919
3′ UTR
77
4651
gagcagaaaatttattcttt
45
147
Human


 


344920
3′ UTR
77
4670
tacacactaaactcatcgtg
56
148
Human


 


344921
3′ UTR
77
4865
catggatttactgagggcag
53
149
Human


 


344922
3′ UTR
77
4973
ttattaaccatggatttact
26
150
Human


 


344923
Coding;
78
286
ggtgtcgtaccaccacctgg
22
151
Human



Exon



1a:Exon 20



junction


 


344924
Intron 9
76
28230
aaagcctactaggttaatca
41
152
Human


 


344925
Intron 10
76
28736
tggaaattaactccatagcc
45
153
Human


 


344926
Coding;
79
542
agggatacaactagagtatg
14
154
Human



Exon



6:Exon 22a



junction









As shown in Table 16, SEQ ID NOs: 82, 83, 85, 86, 88, 89, 91, 92, 93, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, 101, 102, 108, 110, 113, 116, 122, 126, 128, 130, 131, 133, 135, 143, 144 and 148 gave at least 56% inhibition of kinesin-like 1 and are therefore preferred.

Example 31
Antisense Inhibition of Mouse Kinesin-like 1 Expression by Chimeric Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotides having 2′-MOE Wings and a Deoxy Gap
A series of oligonucleotides were designed to target different regions of the mouse kinesin-like 1 RNA, using published sequences (GenBank accession number AJ223293.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 155; and GenBank accession number BB658933.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 156). The oligonucleotides are shown in Table 17. “Target site” indicates the first (5′-most) nucleotide number on the particular target sequence to which the oligonucleotide binds. All compounds in Table 17 are chimeric oligonucleotides (“gapmers”) 20 nucleotides in length, composed of a central “gap” region consisting of ten 2′-deoxynucleotides, which is flanked on both sides (5′ and 3′ directions) by five-nucleotide “wings”. The wings are composed of 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-MOE) nucleotides. The internucleoside (backbone) linkages are phosphorothioate (P═S) throughout the oligonucleotide. All cytidine residues are 5-methylcytidines. The compounds were analyzed for their effect on mouse kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels by quantitative real-time PCR as described in other examples herein. Data are averages from two experiments in which b.END cells were treated with the antisense oligonucleotides of the present invention. As noted, some of the compounds were designed to be fully complementary to more than one animal species (human, mouse, and/or rat).







TABLE 17







Inhibition of mouse kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels


by chimeric phosphorothioate oligonucleotides


having 2′-MOE wings and a deoxy gap

















Target



SEQ




Isis

SEQ ID
Target

%
ID


No
Region
NO
site
Sequence
inhib
NO
Species


















285686
Coding
155
27
tccgtacactgacttctttc
66
157
Mouse



 


285687
Coding
155
32
tgcagtccgtacactgactt
75
158
Mouse


 


285688
Coding
155
88
gctccaaacaccatatcaaa
72
159
Human









Mouse


 


285689
Coding
155
93
tagatgctccaaacaccata
70
160
Human









Mouse


 


285690
Coding
155
677
attttcacttcctgcaagat
60
161
Mouse


 


285691
Coding
155
731
gttgatatttccagcttccc
75
162
Mouse


 


285692
Coding
155
744
tcaagagggattggttgata
58
163
Mouse


 


285693
Coding
155
760
ataactcttcccagagtcaa
68
164
Mouse


 


285694
Coding
155
809
tttagattctcgataaggaa
64
165
Human









Mouse


 


285695
Coding
155
814
gttagtttagattctcgata
72
166
Human









Mouse


 


285696
Coding
155
822
ggattctagttagtttagat
61
167
Human









Mouse


 


285697
Coding
155
834
gagaatcttgcaggattcta
67
168
Mouse


 


285698
Coding
155
862
attatagatgttcttgtacg
49
169
Human









Mouse


 


285699
Coding
155
868
gttgcaattatagatgttct
75
170
Human









Mouse


 


285700
Coding
155
905
cagagtttcctcaagattga
67
171
Human









Mouse


 


285701
Coding
155
910
gtactcagagtttcctcaag
78
172
Human









Mouse


 


285702
Coding
155
915
ccaatgtactcagagtttcc
76
173
Human









Mouse


 


285703
Coding
155
920
atattccaatgtactcagag
70
174
Human









Mouse


 


285704
Coding
155
925
tgagcatattccaatgtact
70
175
Human









Mouse


 


285705
Coding
155
995
ctccttaataagagcttttt
60
176
Human









Mouse


 


285706
Coding
155
1000
gtatactccttaataagagc
65
177
Human









Mouse


 


285707
Coding
155
1032
caagatctcgcttcaaacgc
76
178
Mouse


 


285708
Coding
155
1060
tacactccatttttctcacg
75
179
Human









Mouse


 


285709
Coding
155
1091
attcatggctctaaaacttt
49
180
Mouse


 


285710
Coding
155
1160
ctcctcctcaagaacagcga
74
181
Mouse


 


285711
Coding
155
1204
agttcgttcttactatccat
73
182
Mouse


 


285712
Coding
155
1219
gatttacactggtcaagttc
66
183
Human









Mouse


 


285713
Coding
155
1224
ggtcagatttacactggtca
77
184
Human









Mouse


 


285714
Coding
155
1229
ttgcaggtcagatttacact
78
185
Human









Mouse


 


285715
Coding
155
1264
tgtttctgagtggtttcaag
67
186
Mouse


 


285716
Coding
155
1321
tccaaggctgaagagacata
59
187
Mouse


 


285717
Coding
155
1330
tcggttctttccaaggctga
77
188
Mouse


 


285718
Coding
155
1356
tgctggccgtgtcatgcagt
75
189
Mouse


 


285719
Coding
155
1379
ttctttaaccgtgttaagca
74
190
Mouse


 


285720
Coding
155
1742
atcaatcaatccttgcagaa
71
191
Mouse


 


285721
Coding
155
1818
tatttatgttcaagatggaa
58
192
Mouse


 


285722
Coding
155
1950
aagaaactgtgttttctcgg
66
193
Mouse


 


285723
Coding
155
1972
agcttttgtgattcaaccaa
73
194
Mouse


 


285724
Coding
155
2085
catacttcttctccaaagca
56
195
Mouse


 


285725
Coding
155
2139
tagacctccgctctgtattt
61
196
Mouse


 


285726
Coding
155
2208
cttgtaataatccatcagat
60
197
Mouse


 


285727
Coding
155
2224
ttaaagtgtctgagttcttg
61
198
Mouse


 


285728
Coding
155
2288
caggttgctgttgagtgaac
53
199
Mouse


 


285729
Coding
155
2295
cagtctccaggttgctgttg
61
200
Mouse


 


285730
Coding
155
2374
aggcaggatgcccactgatc
74
201
Mouse


 


285731
Coding
155
2412
actccattaaattctcaagt
71
202
Mouse


 


285732
Coding
155
2484
caacacgtgcgctctgttct
50
203
Mouse


 


285733
Coding
155
2496
tgtgctggttcgcaacacgt
43
204
Mouse


 


285734
Coding
155
2599
aagcaattcagctttgttaa
67
205
Mouse


 


285735
Coding
155
2606
tttcagaaagcaattcagct
61
206
Mouse


 


285736
Coding
155
2643
gtgtcatacctgttgggata
55
207
Mouse


 


285737
Coding
155
2652
tcctctctggtgtcatacct
76
208
Mouse


 


285738
Coding
155
2683
ctcacaagtgttgttggata
76
209
Mouse


 


285739
Coding
155
2754
ctgagctgtttagcatcatt
67
210
Mouse


 


285740
Coding
155
2840
tgtctctggacttacaagtt
55
211
Mouse


 


285741
Coding
155
2852
gggtagttcagttgtctctg
31
212
Mouse


 


285742
Coding
155
2888
aaatggaagacctctgctgg
40
213
Mouse


 


285743
Coding
155
2895
gctggaaaaatggaagacct
56
214
Mouse


 


285744
Coding
155
3036
ctcagatcagctagaggttt
64
215
Mouse


 


285745
Coding
155
3041
taagcctcagatcagctaga
71
216
Mouse


 


285746
3′ UTR
155
3064
gttgtattttaaagatgaca
70
217
Mouse


 


285747
3′ UTR
155
3152
agactttcagttcaactaca
79
218
Mouse


 


285748
3′ UTR
155
3228
acacacacacatattcaatg
64
219
Mouse


 


285749
3′ UTR
155
3272
atacttacttgttacagaag
42
220
Mouse


 


285750
3′ UTR
155
3429
aaaagggagacaggagtcga
59
221
Mouse


 


285751
3′ UTR
155
3500
ttccaggtaaaaccctgcgt
58
222
Mouse


 


285752
3′ UTR
155
3702
agacttaaagaccttttaag
48
223
Mouse


 


285753
3′ UTR
155
3921
ctctctgcatacacttttag
62
224
Mouse


 


285754
3′ UTR
155
3979
ctgtgccaaaaccacatcac
65
225
Mouse


 


285755
3′ UTR
155
4016
tagtgagtccaaagccagcc
59
226
Mouse


 


285756
3′ UTR
155
4035
ggatgactgtcctgctgcat
73
227
Mouse


 


285757
3′ UTR
155
4058
gtctgtattcccaggccttg
73
228
Mouse


 


285758
3′ UTR
155
4175
agatcaggctggcctcgaaa
90
229
Mouse


 


285759
3′ UTR
155
4258
ctctttgttacaaagttcta
73
230
Mouse


 


285760
3′ UTR
155
4366
taatttttattaaaataacg
0
231
Mouse


 


285761
5′ UTR
156
223
tcctctttcttcttcaaaga
66
232
Mouse


 


285762
5′ UTR
156
255
atctcaccaccacctggatg
64
233
Human









Mouse


 


285763
5′ UTR
156
301
actgagtgggcattagcttt
66
234
Mouse









For mouse kinesin-like 1 the PCR primers were:

    primer: GCTTCAAGTTCGGAGATCACTAAGA (SEQ ID NO: 235)
    primer: CGGAAGTCATCTGAGCAACAAA (SEQ ID NO: 236) and the PCR probe was: FAM-AGAACAGAGCGCACGTGTTGCGA-TAMRA

(SEQ ID NO: 237) where FAM is the fluorescent dye and TAMRA is the quencher dye.



Example 32
Mouse-Kinesin-like 1 Antisense Compounds Reduce Kinesin-like 1 mRNA in B16 Melanoma Cells
Mouse B16 melanoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas Va.) were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were treated with ISIS 285714, 285717 and 285747 at 200 nM for 4 hours in Opti-MEM. Kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels were measured by RT-PCR after 24 hours. ISIS 285714, 285717 and 285747 reduced kinesin-like 1 RNA levels by 78%, 80% and 85%, respectively.
Example 33
Mouse Kinesin-like 1 Antisense Compounds Induce G2/M Arrest in B16 Melanoma Cells
Mouse B16 melanoma cells were treated with ISIS 285714, 285717 and 285747 and the percentage of cells in G2/M was measured as in previous examples. The percentage of cells in G2/M after treatment with Isis 285714, 285717 and 285747 was 22%, 18% and 19%, respectively after 48 hours and 34%, 43% and 31%, respectively, after 72 hours, whereas cells treated with unrelated control oligonucleotide had fewer cells in G2/M (20% of cells after 48 hr, 27% after 72 hr).
Example 34
Antisense Inhibitors of Kinesin-like 1 are Nontoxic in Mice
Male C57B16 mice (Jackson Labs) were dosed intraperitoneally with 200 ul of saline or 50 mg/kg of antisense oligonucleotide (ISIS 285714, ISIS 285717 or ISIS 285747) in 200 ul of saline, twice a week for a total of 5 injections. Twenty four hours after the last does, mice were sacrificed and serum and organs were harvested. Liver and spleen weights were not significantly increased in antisense-treated mice compared to saline treated mice. Serum AST and ALT (measures of liver toxicity) were also not significantly increased after antisense treatment.
Example 35
Kinesin-like 1 Expression in SV40 Transgenic (HCC) Mice
An HCC mouse model (Taconic, Germantown N.Y.) for hepatocellular carcinoma was used in which transgenic male mice express SV40 T-antigen (Tag) in their livers, which leads to spontaneous development of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carcinomas. Expression of kinesin-like 1 in livers of wild type mice and HCC mice was measured using array blot analysis. Kinesin-like 1 expression in wild type mouse livers as very low, but was shown to be upregulated up to approximately 15 fold in the HCC mice, and even more(up to about 25 fold) as tumors developed.
Example 36
The Effect of Antisense Inhibition of Kinesin-like 1 Expression in SV40 Transgenic (HCC) Mice
HCC mice were treated with ISIS 285714, 285717 or 285747 or with an unrelated control oligonucleotide. HCC and wild type mice were also treated with saline alone.
Kinesin-like 1 levels were virtually undetectable by RT-PCR in the wild type mice but easily detectable in the HCC mice as a result of the upregulation described in the previous example. Treatment of HCC mice with ISIS 285714, 285717 or 285747 decreased kinesin-like 1 mRNA levels by 72%, 62% and 90%, respectively. The-unrelated control oligonucleotide caused only a 10% reduction in kinesin-like 1 mRNA in HCC mice.
Example 37
Effect of Antisense Inhibitors of Kinesin-like 1 on U87-MG Human Glioblastoma Tumor Cell Xenografts in Mice
Nude mice were injected in the flank with approximately 106 U87-MG human glioblastoma cells. Mice were dosed with ISIS 183891, targeted to human kinesin-like 1, beginning the day after tumor inoculation and continuing every other day. Tumor volume was measured every few days beginning 10 days after inoculation. By day 22, tumor growth was detectably slower in the ISIS 183891-treated mice than in the control-treated mice and at the end of the study at day 30 after inoculation, tumor volume in ISIS 183891-treated mice was approximately 250 mm3, compared to saline-treated and unrelated control oligonucleotide-treated mice in which tumor volume was approximately 650 mm3.
Example 38
Effect of Antisense Inhibitors of Kinesin-like 1 on MDA-MB231 Human Breast Tumor Cell Xenografts in Mice
Nude mice were inoculated with MDA-MB231 human breast cancer cells and were dosed with ISIS 183891, targeted to human kinesin-like 1, as described in the previous example.
By day 30, tumor growth was detectably slower in the ISIS 183891-treated mice than in the control-treated mice and at the end of the study at day 41 after inoculation, tumor volume in ISIS 183891-treated mice was approximately 210 mm3, compared to saline-treated and unrelated control oligonucleotide-treated mice in which tumor volume was approximately 430 mm3 and 380 mm3, respectively.
Together, these examples demonstrate that expression of kinesin-like 1 is upregulated in many cancer cell types, and that antisense inhibitors of kinesin-like 1 are effective for downregulating kinesin-like 1 expression and for arresting growth of a variety of cancer and tumor cell types.
Example 39
Design and Screening of Duplexed Antisense RNA Compounds Targeting Kinesin-like 1
A series of nucleic acid duplexes comprising the antisense compounds of the present invention and their complements was designed to target kinesin-like 1 mRNA, using published sequence information (GenBank accession number NM—004523.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 3 and 4; GenBank accession number NT—030059, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 76; GenBank accession number NM—004523.2, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 77; GenBank accession number BL050421.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 78; and GenBank accession number BX103943.1, incorporated herein as SEQ ID NO: 79). Each duplex is 20 nucleotides in length with blunt ends (no overhangs). The sequence of each antisense strand is listed in Table 18. The sense strand of the dsRNA was designed and synthesized as the complement of the antisense strand. All compounds in Table 18, as well as their complementary sense strands, are oligoribonucleotides, 20 nucleotides in length with phosphodiester internucleoside linkages (backbones) throughout. These sequences are shown to contain thymine (T) but one of skill in the art will appreciate that thymine (T) is generally replaced by uracil (U) in RNA sequences.







TABLE 18







dsRNAs targeted to human kinesin-like 1














ISIS # of


Target


SEQ



antisense
Corresponds to

SEQ ID
Target

ID


strand
sequence of
Region
NO
site
Sequence
NO

















347226
183881
Coding
3
1753
atccaagtgctactgtagta
16



 


347231
183883
Coding
3
2202
caaagcacagaatctctctg
18


 


347206
183891
Coding
3
840
ccgagctctcttatcaacag
26


 


347185
285688
Coding
3
212
gctccaaacaccatatcaaa
80


 


347186
285689
Coding
3
217
tagatgctccaaacaccata
81


 


347207
285694
Coding
3
936
tttagattctcgataaggaa
82


 


347208
285695
Coding
3
941
gttagtttagattctcgata
83


 


347209
285696
Coding
3
949
ggattctagttagtttagat
84


 


347210
285698
Coding
3
989
attatagatgttcttgtacg
85


 


347211
285699
Coding
3
995
gttgcaattatagatgttct
86


 


347212
285700
Coding
3
1032
cagagtttcctcaagattga
87


 


347213
285701
Coding
3
1037
gtactcagagtttcctcaag
88


 


347214
285702
Coding
3
1042
ccaatgtactcagagtttcc
89


 


347215
285703
Coding
3
1047
atattccaatgtactcagag
90


 


347216
285704
Coding
3
1052
tgagcatattccaatgtact
91


 


347217
285705
Coding
3
1122
ctccttaataagagcttttt
92


 


347218
285706
Coding
3
1127
gtatactccttaataagagc
93


 


347219
285708
Coding
3
1187
tacactccatttttctcacg
94


 


347222
285712
Coding
3
1346
gatttacactggtcaagttc
95


 


347223
285713
Coding
3
1351
ggtcagatttacactggtca
96


 


347224
285714
Coding
3
1356
ttgcaggtcagatttacact
97


 


347172
344870
Coding
3
67
tgcatctcaccaccacctgg
98


 


347173
344871
Intron 1
76
10298
gaagtaaaagcaggtagatg
99


 


347174
344872
Intron 1
76
12002
acctgagttcatttttccca
100


 


347175
344873
Intron 9
76
28627
ccgtatactcctacacaaga
101


 


347176
344874
Intron 16
76
46149
aaaatgcatccaacattctt
102


 


347177
344875
Intron 17
76
51266
gaaatccatcagtctagata
103


 


347178
344876
Intron20:Exon
76
57643
catccacatcctaaaagaag
104




21 junction


 


347179
344877
Intron 6a:Exon
76
61939
ggatacaactagggttagat
105




22a junction



 


347180
344878
5′ UTR
77
13
tgcgtggcctggaggaccga
106


 


347181
344879
5′ UTR
77
39
ggagtctccctggtactctc
107


 


347182
344880
Start codon
77
126
gccatgacggtccccgccaa
108


 


347183
344881
Coding
3
79
aattaaatggtctgcatctc
109


 


347184
344882
Coding
3
136
cttttcgtacaggatcacat
110


 


347187
344883
Coding
3
245
acacttcggtaaacatcaat
111


 


347188
344884
Coding
3
251
caaacaacacttcggtaaac
112


 


347189
344885
Coding
3
256
ttggacaaacaacacttcgg
113


 


347190
344886
Coding
3
281
tagcccataataacttcatc
114


 


347191
344887
Coding
3
286
aattatagcccataataact
115


 


347192
344888
Coding
3
329
aaagtttttccagtgccagt
116


 


347193
344889
Coding
3
334
ttgtaaaagtttttccagtg
117


 


347194
344890
Coding
3
346
tttcaccttccattgtaaaa
118


 


347195
344891
Coding
3
351
tgacctttcaccttccattg
119


 


347196
344892
Coding
3
356
ttaggtgacctttcaccttc
120


 


347197
344893
Coding
3
361
cttcattaggtgacctttca
121


 


347198
344894
Coding
3
405
acgtggaattataccagcca
122


 


347199
344895
Coding
3
428
ttctcaaaaatttgatgaag
123


 


347200
344896
Coding
3
437
tcagtaagtttctcaaaaat
124


 


347201
344897
Coding
3
442
cattatcagtaagtttctca
125


 


347202
344898
Coding
3
662
gcagttgtcctttttgctgc
126


 


347203
344899
Coding
3
758
acaagctcttctccatcaat
127


 


347204
344900
Coding
3
763
ttttaacaagctcttctcca
128


 


347205
344901
Coding
3
805
tgttttcacttcctgcaaga
129


 


347220
344902
Coding
3
1218
actcatgactctaaaatttt
130


 


347221
344903
Coding
3
1306
actctgtaaccctattcagc
131


 


347225
344904
Coding
3
1628
tccatattattaaacagact
132


 


347227
344905
Coding
3
1781
gacacattttctggaataga
133


 


347228
344906
Coding
3
1876
tgagtacattaatcaattcc
134


 


347220
344907
Coding
3
2130
cttcaggtcttcagttaggt
135


 


347230
344908
Coding
3
2135
attgtcttcaggtcttcagt
136


 


347232
344909
Stop codon
3
3173
caagtgaattaaaggttgat
137


 


347233
344910
3′ UTR
3
3598
aattcaactgaatttacagt
138


 


347234
344911
3′ UTR
3
3641
caaagtgaactatagggatg
139


 


347235
344912
3′ UTR
77
4125
taaaattctgactactgaaa
140


 


347236
344913
3′ UTR
77
4180
ttgttgacagtgattttaga
141


 


347237
344914
3′ UTR
77
4211
taaaggagggatacaactag
142


 


347238
344915
3′ UTR
77
4351
agtcagatgtctgggtggtc
143


 


347239
344916
3′ UTR
77
4367
gtggcacagagccattagtc
144


 


347240
344917
3′ UTR
77
4548
tcctaagggttaagatttga
145


 


347241
344918
3′ UTR
77
4599
tgaaacatctcaacttccag
146


 


347242
344919
3′ UTR
77
4651
gagcagaaaatttattcttt
147


 


347243
344920
3′ UTR
77
4670
tacacactaaactcatcgtg
148


 


347244
344921
3′ UTR
77
4865
catggatttactgagggcag
149


 


347245
344922
3′ UTR
77
4973
ttattaaccatggatttact
150


 


347246
344923
Coding; Exon
78
286
ggtgtcgtaccaccacctgg
151




1a:Exon 20




junction


 


347247
344924
Intron 9
76
28230
aaagcctactaggttaatca
152


 


347248
344925
Intron 10
76
28736
tggaaattaactccatagcc
153


 


347249
344926
Coding; Exon
79
542
agggatacaactagagtatg
154




6:Exon 22a




junction









The compounds in Table 18 are tested for their effects on human kinesin-like 1 expression in A549 cells. A549 cells are treated with oligonucleotide mixed with LIPOFECTIN (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, Calif.) as described herein. Cells are treated with oligonucleotide for 4 hours and harvested an additional 16 hours later. Untreated cells serve as a control. Human kinesin-like 1 mRNA expression levels are quantitated by real-time PCR as described in other examples herein.

## Claims

1. An antisense compound 12 to 50 nucleobases in length targeted to a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1 (SEQ ID NO: 3), wherein said compound comprises at least an 8-nucleobase portion of SEQ ID NO: 122 and is at least 75% complementary to said nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1.

2. The antisense compound of claim 1 which is 15 to 30 nucleobases in length.

3. The antisense compound of claim 1 comprising an oligonucleotide.

4. The antisense compound of claim 3 comprising a DNA oligonucleotide.

5. The antisense compound of claim 3 comprising an RNA oligonucleotide.

6. The antisense compound of claim 3 comprising a chimeric oligonucleotide.

7. The antisense compound of claim 1 having at least one modified internucleoside linkage, sugar moiety, or nucleobase.

8. The antisense compound of claim 1 having at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar moiety.

9. The antisense compound of claim 1 having at least one phosphorothioate internucleoside linkage.

10. The antisense compound of claim 1 wherein at least one cytosine is a 5-methylcytosine.

11. A method of inhibiting the expression of kinesin-like 1 in a cell or tissue comprising contacting said cell or tissue with the antisense compound of claim 1 so that expression of kinesin-like 1 is inhibited.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the cell or tissue is a cancer cell or cancerous tissue.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the cancer cell or cancer tissue is derived from cancer of the breast, lung, colon, prostate, pancreas, ovary, cervix, brain, liver or kidney.

14. A kit or assay device comprising the antisense compound of claim 1.

15. A method of treating an animal having a disease or condition associated with kinesin-like 1 comprising administering to said animal a therapeutically effective amount of the antisense compound of claim 1 so that expression of kinesin-like 1 is inhibited.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the disease or condition is a hyperproliferative disorder.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the hyperproliferative disorder is cancer or a tumor.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein the cancer or tumor is cancer or a tumor of the breast, lung, colon, prostate, pancreas, ovary, cervix, brain, liver or kidney.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein the disease or condition is an autoimmune disease.

20. A method of modulating a cell cycle comprising contacting a cell with the compound of claim 1 .

21. The method of claim 20 wherein a percentage of cells in G2M phase is increased.

22. A method of reducing expression of kinesin-like 1 in a cell or tissue which overexpresses kinesin-like 1 comprising contacting said cell or tissue with the antisense compound of claim 1 so that expression of kinesin-like 1 is reduced.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein the cell or tissue is a cancer cell or cancerous tissue.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein the cancer cell or cancer tissue is derived from cancer of the breast, lung, colon, prostate, pancreas, ovary, cervix, brain, liver or kidney.

25. The antisense compound of claim 6 wherein said chimeric oligonucleotide is a gapmer.

26. The antisense compound of claim 25 comprising two regions of LNA nucleotides flanking a region of 2′-deoxynucleotides.

27. The antisense compound of claim 7 comprising at least one LNA moiety.

28. A method of decreasing cell proliferation comprising contacting a cell or tissue with the antisense compound of claim 1 so that expression of kinesin-like 1 mRNA is reduced.

29. The method of claim 28 wherein said cell or tissue is a cancer cell or tissue.

30. A method of increasing apoptosis in a cell or tissue, comprising contacting said cell or tissue with an antisense compound of claim 1 so that expression of kinesin-like 1 mRNA is reduced.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein said cell or tissue is a cancer cell or tissue.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein the cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma.

33. The method of claim 17, wherein the cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma.

34. The method of claim 23, wherein the cancerous tissue is hepatocellular carcinoma.

35. The antisense compound of claim 25, comprising two regions of 2′-MOE nucleotides flanking a region of 2′-deoxynucleotides.

36. The antisense compound of claim 35, wherein each region of 2′-MOE nucleotides consists of 5 nucleotides and the region of 2′-deoxynucleotides consists of 10 nucleotides.

37. An antisense compound 12 to 50 nucleobases in length targeted to a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1 (SEQ ID NO: 3), said compound having a nucleotide sequence consisting of SEQ ID NO: 122.

38. The antisense compound of claim 1 which is 100% complementary to the nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1.

39. An antisense oligonucleotide 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 or 25 nucleobases in length targeted to a nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1 (SEQ ID NO: 3), wherein said compound has at least 80% identity with SEQ ID NO: 122.

40. The antisense oligonucleotide of claim 39 which is 18, 19, 20, 21 or 22 nucleobases in length and has at least 90% identity with SEQ ID NO: 122.

41. The antisense oligonucleotide of claim 40 which is 19, 20 or 21 nucleobases in length and has at least 95% identity with SEQ ID NO: 122.

42. The antisense compound of claim 1 which is at least 80% complementary to the nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1.

43. The antisense compound of claim 1 which is at least 85% complementary to the nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1.

44. The antisense compound of claim 1 which is at least 90% complementary to the nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1.

45. The antisense compound of claim 1 which is at least 95% complementary to the nucleic acid molecule encoding kinesin-like 1.