alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### New York State Electric *&*Gas Corporation, Respondent, v. City of Plattsburgh et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Warren County Special Term, which granted to plaintiff an injunction *pendente lite,*and denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint herein. In the guise of a taxpayer plaintiff has brought an action to restrain the City of Plattsburgh and its- officials from prosecuting a condemnation proceeding to acquire a part of the electric utility system of the Eastern New York Power Corporation, on the grounds that the proposed acquisition is not necessary for the public use and the acts of the city and its officials relative thereto are *ultra vires.*In connection therewith plaintiff moved for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from taking any further steps in the condemnation proceeding until the determination of the action herein. Defendants made a cross motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter and the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Special Term held that it *809could not be summarily determined that the complaint did not state a cause of action, and pointed out that doubt exists as to whether the city’s delegated power of eminent domain is broad enough to permit condemnation of the property sought, especially in view of its location and other circumstances involved, such as the fact it is already devoted to a public use and the interests of other municipalities and corporate consumers may be involved. Defendants presented nothing either at Special Term or in this court to justify a conclusion that the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. Order affirmed, with $25 costs. Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon and Halpern, JJ., concur; Imrie, J., taking no part. [See *post,*p. 846.]
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000129 14-OCT-2015 09:07 AM
### SUBCHAPTER IV—IMPROPER PAYMENTS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,506
<SECURITIES>                                       426
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,700
<INVENTORY>                                     36,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,565
<PP&E>                                          26,414
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,931
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,169)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,056
<SALES>                                         37,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,909
<CGS>                                           28,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   430
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:52 a.m. on Tuesday, December 18, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate, and resolution activities.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director Kathleen L. Kraninger (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), and concurred in by Director Joseph M. Otting (Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Jelena McWilliams, that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), and (c)(9)(B).

Dated: December 18, 2018.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

 Robert E. Feldman,

 Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-27736 Filed 12-18-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE P
### §425. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 7, 1924, ch. 316, §9, 43 Stat. 606, directed Secretary of War to investigate depositing of polluting substances into navigable streams and report the results to Congress not later than two years from June 7, 1924. Subsequent to editorial omission of this section as obsolete, Pub. L. 89–753, title II, §211(a), Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1252–1254, amended act June 7, 1924, generally, after which such Act consisted only of sections 1 to 7, resulting in the statutory omission of section 9.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Frank F. Arnold, Deceased. Manufacturers Trust Company et al., Respondents; Ada G. Dolan, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with one bill of $10 costs to the respondents. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 670.]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-01-066 December 3, 2001

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330/e-mail: dps@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331/e-mail: nas@nrc.gov

3RD LIBRARY TO MAKE AVAILABLE PEACH BOTTOM LICENSE

 RENEWAL INFORMATION

 

 In an effort to broaden access to information on the license renewal process for the Peach Bottom

nuclear power plant, another public library in the vicinity of the facility will now make available related

documents. The Quarryville Library, in Lancaster County, Pa., recently agreed to a Nuclear Regulatory

Commission request to serve as a location where members of the public can view documents pertaining to

an environmental review required as part of the process.

 The NRCís request came after local citizens suggested the libraryís use at a recent public meeting at

which comments on the environmental review were sought.

 The Quarryville Library is located at 357 Buck Road in Quarryville. Its hours are 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.,

Monday through Thursday, and 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. It is closed on Sunday.

 Copies of the license renewal documents are also available at two other libraries:

! Harford County Public Library, Whiteford Branch, 2407 Whiteford Road, Whiteford, Md. 21160;

and

! Collinsville Community Library, 2632 Delta Road, Brogue, Pa. 17309.

 

 In addition, copies can be obtained from the NRC Public Document Room, located at One White

Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md., 1-800-397-4209.

 Exelon Corporation, which operates the Peach Bottom plant, submitted its license renewal

application for the York County, Pa., facility to the NRC in July 2001. The current schedule provides for

a final licensing decision in July 2003.

 #
### §3326. Waiver of requirements for warrants and advances

(a) When the Secretary of the Treasury and the Comptroller General decide that, with sufficient safeguards, existing procedures may be changed to simplify, improve, and economize the control and accounting of public money, they may prescribe joint regulations for waiving any part of the requirements in effect on September 12, 1950, that—

(1) warrants be issued and countersigned for the receipt, retention, and disbursement of public money and trust funds; and

(2) amounts be requisitioned and advanced to accountable officials.

(b) Regulations of the Secretary and the Comptroller General may provide for the payment of vouchers by authorized disbursing officials by checks drawn on the general fund of the Treasury. However, the regulations shall provide for appropriate action (including suspension or withdrawal of authority to make payments) against a delinquent disbursing official for any reason related to the official's accounts.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 951.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3326(a) | 31:66c(a). | Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, §115, 64 Stat. 837. |
| 3326(b) | 31:66c(b). | |

In subsection (a), before clause (1), the words "in effect on September 12, 1950" are substituted for "existing" for clarity. In clause (2), the words "under each separate appropriation head or otherwise" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (b), the word "official" is substituted for "officers" for consistency. The word "Treasury" is substituted for "Treasurer of the United States" because of the source provisions restated in section 321 of the revised title and Department of the Treasury Order 229 of January 14, 1974 (39 F.R. 2280). The words "in the rendition of their accounts or for other" and "under necessary circumstances" are omitted as surplus.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHAD W. LEONHART,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 346 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
### §547a. Inclusion of regional economic development benefits in economic analysis for purposes of computing economic justification of project

In the case of any authorized navigation project which has been partially constructed, or is to be constructed, which is located in one or more States, and which serves regional needs, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may include in any economic analysis which is under preparation on October 22, 1976, such regional economic development benefits as he determines to be appropriate for purposes of computing the economic justification of the project.

(Pub. L. 94–587, §140, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2930.)
### §426o–2. Great Lakes navigation and protection

#### (a) Great Lakes navigation

Using available funds, the Secretary shall expedite the operation and maintenance, including dredging, of the navigation features of the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels for the purpose of supporting commercial navigation to authorized project depths.

#### (b) Great Lakes pilot project

Using available funds, the Director of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, in coordination with the Secretary, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Commandant of the Coast Guard, and the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, shall carry out a pilot project, on an emergency basis, to control and prevent further spreading of viral hemorrhagic septicemia in the Great Lakes and Connecting Channels.

#### (c) Great Lakes and Connecting Channels defined

In this section, the term "Great Lakes and Connecting Channels" includes Lakes Superior, Huron, Michigan, Erie, and Ontario, all connecting waters between and among such lakes used for commercial navigation, any navigation features in such lakes or waters that are a Federal operation or maintenance responsibility, and areas of the Saint Lawrence River that are operated or maintained by the Federal Government for commercial navigation.

(Pub. L. 110–114, title V, §5014, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1195.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

|(a) | the Annual Report of the Fund on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                     
|   



|Date: March 15, 2006
|--------------------



| | /s/ Michelle A. GreenMichelle A. GreenChief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 530.201 Purpose.

This subpart establishes regulations for limiting an employee's aggregate annual compensation. An employee's aggregate compensation received in any given calendar year may not exceed the rate of pay for level I of the Executive Schedule or the rate payable to the Vice President at the end of the calendar year, whichever is applicable to the employee based on the certification status under 5 CFR part 430, subpart D, of the performance appraisal system covering that employee. These regulations must be applied in conjunction with 5 U.S.C. 5307.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 24

- 00116

- CR

IN RE CHRISTIAN ESQUIVEL

Original Proceeding

From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. 30,367

DISSENTING OPINION

I would request a response. While the allegations and request for relief are a bit
muddled, it is clear that Esquivel filed a motion in August of 2022 for which he has
received no ruling. Then, in an effort to get a ruling , he sought to dismiss that motion
without prejudice and file a new motion. And because he did not get a ruling on that

motion, he wrote to the trial court clerk. I think an appropriately broad reading of the
pro se pleadings make it clear that Esquivel has filed a motion and endeavored in an
appropriate manner to bring it to the trial court's attention but has received no ruling. He

asserts he is entitled to a rul ing. Esquivel is clearly not entitled to relief on the second

issue, and thus I could concur in the denial of that issue. I would , however, be inclinedIn re Esquivel Page 2 to request a response from the parties limited to the first issue because after three efforts

via letters to the clerk, he still does not have a ruling. We cannot compel what the ruling
is, but at some point, he is entitled to a ruling

. 1

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Dissenting Opinion delivered and filed May 9 , 20 24

1 See In re Rangel , 570 S.W.3d 968, 970

- 71 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2019, orig. proceeding) (Chief Justice Gray concurring) ("The State, as the real party in interest in this proceeding, and the Court, fault Rangel for not bringing forth any evidence that his motion for post

- convict ion DNA testing was actually brought to the attention of the trial court. Technically that is correct. But then ask yourself; how exactly is an inmate supposed to do that? It is not like he can take a copy to the trial court's office, courtroom, or home to "serve" the trial court with a copy of the motion. And no matter how many letters the inmate writes, in all likelihood those letters are going straight to a file in the clerk's office. Although those letters may possibly get as far as the court coordi nator, they do not necessarily make it to the trial court, even if addressed for delivery only to the trial court judge. But even then, how is the inmate supposed to get any evidence that the trial court was actually made aware of the motion? This Court requested a response from the parties. The trial court is a party, the respondent. We could infer from that procedure the trial court is now aware of the motion. Maybe Rangel can now use this proceeding and that inference to compel a ruling if one is

no t timely received after this Court's opinion and judgment issue.")

. In this instance , Esquivel has shown that he sought to bring his motion to the attention of the trial court by writing to the trial court clerk.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wayland R. Hicks, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    WAYLAND R. HICKS Wayland R. Hicks Chief Executive Officer


February 26, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2014089EN.01000501.xml

| 25.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 89/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 89/5

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Protocol Amending the Agreement on Government Procurement

The Protocol Amending the Agreement on Government Procurement (1) will enter into force on 6 April 2014.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 68, 7.3.2014, p. 2.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,000
<SECURITIES>                                   446,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,399,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,727,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,653,000
<PP&E>                                         499,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,302,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,357,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,753,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,302,000
<SALES>                                      2,127,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,127,000
<CGS>                                        1,082,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,151,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (85,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>