alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-024 April 15, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION CO.

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF BYRON NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon

Generation Company on Wednesday, April 21, to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of

safety performance at the Byron Nuclear Power Station during 2003. The facility, which has two

reactor units, is located near Byron, Illinois.

The meeting will be held at 1 p.m. at the Jarrett Prairie Center in the Byron Forest Preserve, 

7993 North River Road, Byron. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will

be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public. In addition, the

NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

The NRC has concluded that the plant operated safely last year, and plant performance does not

require additional inspections beyond the normal inspection program. Routine inspections are

performed by the two resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from the

NRC’s Region III office in Lisle, Illinois. 

A March 4 letter from the NRC to Exelon officials addresses the performance of the plant

during 2003 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available online at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/byro_2003q4.pdf

With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories to

enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of these

requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat conditions. 

The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

Current performance indicators and inspection findings for each Byron unit are available on the

NRC web site at: 

(Byron 1) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BYRO1/byro1_chart.html and (Byron 2)

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BYRO2/byro2_chart.html

###
9059 NW 152nd LN Miami, FL 33018

October 15, 2015

US Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Add Aircraft to Shot From Above LLC, Exemption. (Exemption # 12225 in Docket No. FAA-2015-1656)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Shot From Above LLC (Exemption # 12225 in Docket No. FAA-2015-1656) was granted an exemption to conduct aerial data collection and closed set TV/ Movie filming using a DJI S1000+.

There is no request for additional relief from any further regulations. Shot From Above LLC, requests for an amendment to that exemption to add onto it’s fleet the DJI Inspire 1 and the Freefly Systems Alta. Granting this exemption would not affect safety but will benefit the public because instead of dangerous helicopters being used, safer and quieter unmanned aircraft can be used under the restrictions outlined in the previously granted exemption. Shot From Above LLC, agrees to operate under the same restrictions in the exemption.

The Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (“FOPM”) for each aircraft can be found using the links below:

DJI Inspire 1 User Manual

http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/
Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf

Shot from Above LLC Page of 1 2Freefly Systems Alta User Manual & Setup Guide

http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/28175748/
ALTA_Manual_RevB.pdf

http://d27w8s76bjlz9v.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/24212006/FFASG.pdf

Shot From Above LLC, will operate only within the limitations in the previously granted exemption and the limitations listed within each aircraft’s FOPM.

Since the Freefly Systems Alta and the DJI Inspire 1 platform has been previously granted in other exemptions (Exemption No. 12362, etc.) and would not set any precedent, there is good cause to waive the publishing of this petition in the Federal Register.

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact the undersigned at 786-970-8352 or at yovani@shotfromabove.net.

Sincerely yours,

Yovani Linares

President Shot From Above, LLC

Shot from Above LLC Page of 2 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


PRESS RELEASE

April 9, 1997

       Multimedia Games, Inc. ("MGAM") announced today that the Company has
signed a memorandum of understanding with the National Indian Gaming Commission
("NIGC") to implement certain changes to the Company's high-speed video game,
MegaMania(TM), in order to maintain the Commission's classification of the game
as bingo.  Classification as a bingo game allows MegaMania(TM) to be offered by
high-stakes Indian bingo halls in all 47 of those States where charity bingo is
allowed by State law as long as the game occurs on Indian trust land.

       The changes were developed in response to an analysis by the NIGC, the
Department of Justice, and the U.S. Attorney in the Northern District of
Oklahoma which began an investigation of this subject approximately one year
ago.  The Commission originally requested that these changes be made by April
11, 1997, but agreed in the memorandum to extend that time sufficiently to
assure a more orderly conversion and allow the present game to continue until
the new changes are completed.

       Gordon Graves, Chief Executive Officer of MGAM, said, "It is our intent
to comply with the Commission's request as rapidly as possible.  We believe the
changes will probably make the game even more attractive to the consumer than
the present version.  The lower tier prize patterns will change to a more
conventional format, but the overall percentage prize payment and the frequency
of win by all participants will remain the same.  We are on a fast track to
complete the changes and are pleased that the Government has granted us
reasonable time to comply.  Receipt of this letter closes a chapter of legal
uncertainty that has clouded our status for the past nine months or more.  We
are relieved to have that situation behind us."

       Multimedia Games, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary
MegaBingo(R), Inc., has exclusive contracts with over 50 Indian nations to
provide linked games that are integrated among multiple halls.  Multimedia
Games, Inc. is the nations leading provider of linked high-stakes bingo games,
electronic based interactive bingo games, and associated data processing
services and products to the Indian gaming industry.

Contact:             Gordon Graves or             Multimedia Games, Inc.
                     Fred Roll                    (800)-729-2464
<PAGE>

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of OMNI Energy Services Corp. of our report dated March 12, 2004,
with respect to the 2003 consolidated financial statements of OMNI Energy
Services Corp. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-110198 (Amended and Restated OMNI Energy Services
          Corp. Stock Incentive Plan)

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-49409 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Stock Incentive
          Plan and Stock Option Agreements with Certain Employees)

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-80973 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock Option
          Plan Stock Incentive Plan)

     o    Form S-8 No. 333-35816 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. 1999 Stock Option
          Plan)

     o    Form S-3 No. 333-69436 (OMNI Energy Services Corp. Registration
          Statement)


/s/ FITTS ROBERTS & CO., P.C.

Fitts Roberts & Co., P.C.

Houston, Texas
March 30, 2004
§ 300.605 Creditable service. ( a ) All service at the required or higher grade (or equivalent) in positions to which appointed in the Federal civilian service is creditable towards the time periods required by § 300.604 of this part, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section. Creditable service includes competitive and excepted service in positions under the General Schedule and other pay systems, including employment with a nonappropriated fund instrumentality. Service while on detail is credited at the grade of the employee's position of record, not the grade of the position to which detailed. Also creditable is service with the District of Columbia Government prior to January 1, 1980 (or prior to September 26, 1980, for those District employees who were converted to the District personnel system on January 1, 1980).
( b ) Service in positions not subject to the General Schedule (GS) is credited at the equivalent GS grade by comparing the candidate's rate of basic pay with the representative rate (as defined in § 351.203 of this chapter) of the GS position in effect when the non-GS service was performed. The equivalent GS grade is the GS grade with a representative rate that equals the candidate's rate of basic pay. When the candidate's rate of basic pay falls between the representative rates of two GS grades, the non-GS service is credited at the higher grade.
( c ) In applying the restrictions in § 300.604 of this part, prior service under temporary appointment at a level above that of a subsequent nontemporary competitive appointment is credited as if the service had been performed at the level of the nontemporary appointment. This provision applies until the employee has served in pay status for 52 weeks under nontemporary competitive appointment; thereafter, the service is credited at its actual grade level (or equivalent).
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-3 No.'s 333-41419-99, 333-70151, 333-70255,
333-64463 and 333-86197), the Registration Statement of United Rentals, Inc.
(Form S-8 No. 333-70345) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Stock
Option Plan, and 1998 Supplemental Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statements of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No.'s 333-74091 and 333-87903)
pertaining to the options outstanding in connection with the 1997 Performance
Award Plan of U.S. Rentals assumed pursuant to the merger with U.S. Rentals and
the Registration Statement of United Rentals, Inc. (Form S-8 No. 333-39770)
pertaining to the United Rentals, Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan and United
Rentals, Inc. Acquisition Plan, of our report dated February 23, 2001 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of United
Rentals, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                          /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


MetroPark, New Jersey
March 20, 2001
### §6508. Studies and reports

(a)(1) When requested by a committee of Congress having jurisdiction over a grant program, the Comptroller General shall study the program. The study shall include a review of—

(A) the extent to which—

(i) the program conflicts with or duplicates other grant programs; and

(ii) more effective, efficient, economical, and uniform administration of the program may be achieved by changing the requirements and procedures applicable to it; and

(B) budgetary, accounting, reporting, and administrative procedures of the program.

(2) The Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on a study made under this subsection and any recommendations. To the extent practicable, a report on an expiring program shall be submitted in the year before the year in which a program ends.

(b)(1) When requested by a committee of Congress having jurisdiction over a grant program, the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations shall study the intergovernmental relations aspects of the program, including—

(A) the impact of the program on the structural organization of States and local governments and on Federal-State-local fiscal relations; and

(B) the coordination of administration of the program by the United States Government and State and local governments.

(2) The Commission shall submit to the committee requesting the study and to Congress a report and any recommendations.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1010.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 6508(a) | 42:4242. | Oct. 16, 1968, Pub. L. 90–577, §§602, 603, 82 Stat. 1107. |
| 6508(b) | 42:4243. | |

In the section, the words "of Congress" are added for clarity. The words "grant program" are substituted for "grant-in-aid program" for consistency in the chapter.

In subsection (a)(1), before clause (A), the words "The study shall include a review of" are substituted for "to determine" for clarity. In clause (B), the words "among other relevant matters" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b)(1)(B), the words "administration of the program by the United States Government" are substituted for "Federal administration" for consistency in the revised title.

In subsection (b)(2), the words "requesting the study" are added for clarity.
### Part I—Gang Resistance Education and Training
### Part C—Civil Rights for Women
### §701p. Railroad bridge alterations at Federal expense

On and after July 24, 1946, for authorized flood protection projects which include alterations of railroad bridges the Chief of Engineers is authorized to include at Federal expense the necessary alterations of railroad bridges and approaches in connection therewith.

(July 24, 1946, ch. 596, §3, 60 Stat. 642.)
(Republish)

#### Murray L. Jacobs, Respondent, v. Michael Tuch Foundation, Inc., Appellant.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified so as to deny the motion to strike out the second defense and, as so modified, affirmed. We think the allegations of the second defense sufficient. Settle order on notice. Present — Cohn, J. P., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 933.]
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-033 July 1, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO MEET WITH PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC

TO DISCUSS DIABLO CANYON ISSUES

Officials of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. on July 27 to discuss problem identification and resolution and human

performance issues at the Diablo Canyon power plant. PG&E operates the plant, located in San

Luis Obispo, California.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will be held between 6 and 8 p.m. at

PG&E’s Community Center, 6588 Ontario Road, San Luis Obispo. The public is invited to

observe the meeting and the NRC staff will be available for comments and questions from the

public before the meeting adjourns. People interested in attending should contact Vincent

Gaddy at (800) 952-9677, or via e-mail at: vgg@nrc.gov .

During its most recent safety assessment of Diablo Canyon, NRC identified the need for

improvement in PG&E’s problem identification and resolution program and in human

performance. These areas were discussed during a June 10 public meeting with PG&E in San

Luis Obispo.

###
§ 2423.10 What actions may the Regional Director take with regard to your charge? ( a ) *Regional Director action.* The Regional Director, on behalf of the General Counsel, may take any of the following actions, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Approve a request to withdraw a charge;
( 2 ) Dismiss a charge;
( 3 ) Approve a written settlement agreement under § 2423.12;
( 4 ) Issue a complaint; or
( 5 ) Withdraw a complaint.
( b ) *Request for appropriate temporary relief.* Parties may request the General Counsel to seek appropriate temporary relief (including a restraining order) under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d). The General Counsel may initiate and prosecute injunctive proceedings under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d) only upon approval of the Authority. A determination by the General Counsel not to seek approval of the Authority to seek temporary relief is final and cannot be appealed to the Authority.
( c ) *General Counsel requests to the Authority.* When a complaint issues and the Authority approves the General Counsel's request to seek appropriate temporary relief (including a restraining order) under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d), the General Counsel may make application for appropriate temporary relief (including a restraining order) in the district court of the United States within which the unfair labor practice is alleged to have occurred or in which the party sought to be enjoined resides or transacts business. The General Counsel may seek temporary relief if it is just and proper and the record establishes probable cause that an unfair labor practice is being committed. Temporary relief will not be sought if it would interfere with the ability of the agency to carry out its essential functions.
( d ) *Actions subsequent to obtaining appropriate temporary relief.* The General Counsel must inform the district court that granted temporary relief under 5 U.S.C. 7123(d) whenever an Administrative Law Judge recommends dismissal of the complaint, in whole or in part.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Waterworks, Inc.
(the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mechelle Slaughter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

/s/ Mechelle Slaughter
-------------------------------
Mechelle Slaughter
Chief Financial Officer
August 7, 2003

A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to National
Waterworks, Inc. and will be retained by National Waterworks, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request.
#### § 301.303 Performance appraisal.

As soon as practicable, but beginning not later than January 1, 1984, overseas agencies are required to evaluate the performance of employees who serve under overseas local hire appointments as defined in § 315.608(b) of this chapter and who are eligible to meet the criteria established in § 315.608(a), of this chapter in accordance with the agency's performance appraisal plan established under chapter 43 of title 5, U.S. Code, unless the agency is exempt from the provisions of that chapter.
### §9310. Individual sureties

If another applicable Federal law or regulation permits the acceptance of a bond from a surety that is not subject to sections 9305 and 9306 and is based on a pledge of assets by the surety, the assets pledged by such surety shall—

(1) consist of eligible obligations described under section 9303(a); and

(2) be submitted to the official of the Government required to approve or accept the bond, who shall deposit the obligations as described under section 9303(b).

(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, §874(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 940.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 year after Nov. 25, 2015, see section 874(c) of Pub. L. 114–92, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 694b of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
### §51. Scajaquada Creek, New York

Scajaquada Creek, Erie County, New York, is declared to be nonnavigable east of a line one hundred and thirty feet west of the west line of Niagara Street, city of Buffalo, county of Erie, New York, within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(May 14, 1937, ch. 183, §§1, 2, 50 Stat. 165.)
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-021 April 11, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT SURRY NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Dominion officials on

Wednesday, April 19, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at the Surry

nuclear power plant, located near Surry in southeastern Virginia.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled for 11:00 a.m. in the Surry Government

Center, 45 School Street in Surry. The NRC staff will present the results of the assessment and be

available to respond to questions or comments from the public before the close of the meeting. 

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Surry plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting is a chance for us to discuss that safety performance with the company, with local officials and

with people living near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/sur_2005q4.pdf .

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

depending on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

The NRC said the Surry plant operated safely during 2005 with all inspection findings being

“green,” or of very low safety significance, and all performance indicators also indicating performance

at levels requiring no additional NRC oversight. 

As a result, the NRC plans to conduct only routine baseline inspections at the plant for the rest

of 2006. The NRC staff will also conduct several non-routine inspections, including the independent

spent fuel storage facility and the containment sump for Unit 2. 

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. 
Current information for the Surry plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUR1/sur1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SUR2/sur2_chart.html .

###