alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1606. Special rules for ships of war, vessels proceeding under convoy, and fishing vessels engaged in fishing as a fleet

(a) The Secretary of the Navy is authorized to promulgate special rules with respect to additional station or signal lights or whistle signals for ships of war or vessels proceeding under convoy, and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating is authorized to promulgate special rules with respect to additional station or signal lights for fishing vessels engaged in fishing as a fleet.

(b) The additional station or signal lights or whistle signals contained in the special rules authorized under subsection (a) of this section shall be, as far as possible, such that they cannot be mistaken for any light or signal authorized by the International Regulations. Notice of such special rules shall be published in the Federal Register and, after the effective date specified in such notice, they shall have effect as if they were a part of the International Regulations.

(Pub. L. 95–75, §7, July 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 310.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### Mary T. Palma, Respondent, v. The Town of North Hempstead, Appellant. Walter W. Hoffman, Respondent v. The Town of North Hempstead, Appellant.

Appeals from orders of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 15th day of March, 1915, denying motions for a change of the place of trial.

Per Curiam:

The orders appealed from are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the motions were prematurely made, without prejudice to a renewal of the motions upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. In each case order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a renewal of the motion upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses after issue joined.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.30

                           AMENDMENT No. 1 TO CHANGE
                             IN CONTROL AGREEMENT



AMENDMENT, dated as of October 19, 2000, to that certain Change in Control
Agreement, dated May 12, 2000, 2000 (the "Agreement") by and between Paul H.
Bristow (the "Executive") and eFunds Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company").

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as
hereinafter set forth to eliminate certain technical ambiguities therein.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

     I.   Amendment
          ---------

          Section I(C)(1) of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete the
          words:

            ", other than a Person or group of Persons who are, or would be if
            the securities of the Company were registered pursuant to Section 12
            of the Exchange Act, entitled to report their ownership of the
            Company's securities on a Schedule 13G in lieu of a Schedule 13D
            (but only during such time as such Person or group of Persons remain
            eligible to use such Schedule 13g),"


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of the date
first set forth above.


eFunds Corporation                Executive



By:/s/ John A. Blanchard III      By:/s/ Paul H. Bristow
   --------------------------        ---------------------
   John A. Blanchard III             Paul H. Bristow
Its: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1882 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1882

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 440 South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando, Florida, as the ``Arthur 
                     `Pappy' Kennedy Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2003

 Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 440 South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando, Florida, as the ``Arthur 
                     `Pappy' Kennedy Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 440 
South Orange Blossom Trail in Orlando, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Arthur `Pappy' Kennedy Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Arthur ``Pappy'' Kennedy Post 
Office.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00304-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law

Cooke County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR19-64649

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

DENISHA MARIE NORTH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Denisha Marie North pleaded guilty to misdemeanor possession of 

marijuana. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121(b)(1). The trial court 

deferred adjudication and placed her on community supervision for eighteen months. 

North attempted to appeal.

On December 10, 2019, North’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw indicating 

that “[i]t is Counsel’s opinion that Appellant does not wish to prosecute her appeal.” 

And on December 11, 2019, the trial court filed an amended certification which stated 

that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

We abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court with instructions 

to determine whether appellant desired to continue the appeal. On January 15, 2020, 

the trial court rendered an order stating that North “no longer wishes to pursue the 

appeal.”

On January 22, 2020, we notified North and her attorney of the trial court’s 

certification. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). In our letter, we informed North that if 

she did not respond by February 3, 2020, showing grounds for continuing the appeal, 

the appeal could be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. North did not respond 

to our letter. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismiss this 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006).

Per Curiam
3

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: February 27, 2020
### §701b–3. Examinations and surveys; availability of appropriations

Funds heretofore or hereafter appropriated for construction and maintenance of flood-control works by the Department of the Army shall be available for expenditure by the Department of the Army in making examinations and surveys for flood control heretofore or hereafter authorized, or in preparing reports in review thereof as authorized by law, in addition to funds heretofore authorized to be expended for such purposes by the Department of the Army.

(Aug. 11, 1939, ch. 699, §2, 53 Stat. 1414; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
#### § 332.102 Definitions.

In this part:

*Active military duty* has the meaning given that term in 5 CFR 211.102(f).

*Certificate* means a list of eligibles from which an appointing officer selects one or more applicants for appointment.

*Objection* means an agency's request to remove a candidate from consideration on a particular certificate.

*Pass over request* means an objection filed against a preference eligible that results in the selection of a non-preference eligible.

[74 FR 30461, June 26, 2009]
### §2326d. Alternative projects to maintenance dredging

The Secretary may enter into agreements to assume the operation and maintenance costs of an alternative project to maintenance dredging for a Federal navigation channel if the costs of the operation and maintenance of the alternative project, and any remaining costs necessary for maintaining the Federal navigation channel, are less than the costs of maintaining such channel without the alternative project.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1106, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1634.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 114–322, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.0

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
EFC Bancorp, Inc.


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-68743) of EFC Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated February 26,
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of EFC Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report
appears in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of EFC Bancorp, Inc.


                                                     /s/  KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1999
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-045 April 4, 2006

NRC USES RISK INSIGHTS TO REVISE MITIGATING SYSTEMS

CATEGORY IN REACTOR OVERSIGHT PROCESS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has updated its Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) with the

introduction of the Mitigating Systems Performance Index (MSPI), which tracks the availability and

reliability of systems used to reduce the severity of incidents at a nuclear power plant.

The agency created the ROP six years ago to improve its inspection and enforcement programs

for commercial nuclear power plants. At that time, the process included performance indicators for

safety system unavailability, but ongoing experience with the ROP revealed the need for further

enhancement. The MSPI addresses this need and takes into account plant-specific features.

“The MSPI constitutes a significant enhancement to the ROP’s performance indicators by more

fully incorporating understanding of how systems contribute to a plant’s overall safety picture,” said

Jim Dyer, Director of the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “This change will improve our

ability to track how well utilities are running their plants.”

The NRC has worked with stakeholders on refining the MSPI since a pilot program in 2002.

The development of the new indicator has included multiple public meetings and public comments, as

well as input from the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards and other nuclear regulators

interested in using similar methods. The NRC and stakeholders have established a risk assessment

methodology and have developed software and databases to provide the raw data necessary for

evaluating the index. The NRC will issue shortly a Regulatory Issue Summary on implementing the

MSPI.

###
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0217

Focus Ready Draft 2/7/2013

ENGINEER: Avcin \ AH / JAS

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]

SAT (concerns) (01/25/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 1-2 Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 4 ppb), XB

Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0217
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0217
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0217
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130217.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:56:17 AM]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00309-CV

Victor Fonseca and Rig Cleaners, 

LLC

v.

Peggy Sue Bishop, as Executrix of 

Estate of Charles T. Blish, In the 

Right of Rig Cleaners, LLC, and the 

Estate of Charles T. Blish, 

Individually

§

§

§

§

§

From Probate Court No. 2

of Tarrant County

(2013-PR01571-2-A)

October 16, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 10.21.1


                                  July 30, 2007


Talon International
(f/k/a Tag-It Pacific, Inc.)
21900 Burbank Blvd., Suite 270
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Attention: Lonnie D. Schnell, CFO

         Re:      AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LOAN AGREEMENT

Dear Sirs:

         Reference is made to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated
June 27, 2007 (the "LOAN  AGREEMENT") by and between Bluefin  Capital,  LLC (the
"LENDER")  and Talon  International,  Inc.  (f/k/a  Tag-It  Pacific,  Inc.) (the
"BORROWER").  All  capitalized  terms used herein  without  definition  have the
respective meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.

         This will confirm the  agreement of the Lender and the Borrower to make
the following correction to the Loan Agreement as follows:

         1.       CORRECTED COVENANT.  Section 6.17 the Loan Agreement is hereby
amended, effective as of June 29, 2007, so as to read in full as follows:

                           SECTION 6.17. COVERAGE TEST. Permit, as of the end of
                  the  quarter  of  any  Fiscal  Year,  principal  and  interest
                  payments by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the four (4)
                  consecutive  quarters then ended  (excluding  principal of the
                  Convertible  Debentures  and  principal  payments  made from a
                  matched source where such matched source makes the payment) to
                  exceed  EBITDA  for  such  four  (4)  fiscal  quarter  period;
                  provided,  however,  that the Lender shall not  accelerate the
                  Obligations by reason of any non-compliance  with this Section
                  6.17 unless and until non-compliance herewith occurs as of the
                  end of two (2) consecutive fiscal quarters.

         2.       ONGOING  FORCE  AND  EFFECT.  Except  as  expressly  set forth
herein,  all of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement  remain unchanged
and in full force and effect.  From and after June 29, 2007,  all  references to
the Loan Agreement in any other Loan Documents  shall mean and refer to the Loan
Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 1.

         3.       GOVERNING  LAW.  This  amendment  shall  be  governed  by  and
construed in accordance  with the laws of the State of New York,  without giving
effect to conflicts of laws principles.


<PAGE>


         Kindly  confirm your  agreement to the  foregoing by  countersigning  a
counterpart copy of this Amendment No. 1 in the space provided below.



                                     Very truly yours,


                                     BLUEFIN CAPITAL, LLC

                                     By:  /S/ LARRY E. LENIG, JR.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                              Larry E. Lenig, Jr., Vice Chairman

Acknowledge, Confirmed and Agreed To:

TALON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(f/k/a Tag-It Pacific, Inc.)


By:  /S/ LONNIE D. SCHNELL
    -----------------------------------------------
         Lonnie D. Schnell, Chief Financial Officer
# L_2015230EN.01004401.xml

| 3.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 230/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 230/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 237/2014

of 24 October 2014

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2015/1461]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 368/2014 of 10 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 368/2014 of 10 April 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 establishing the Community list of air carriers which are subject to an operating ban within the Community (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0368: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 368/2014 of 10 April 2014 (OJ L 108, 11.4.2014, p. 16).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0368: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 368/2014 of 10 April 2014 (OJ L 108, 11.4.2014, p. 16).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 368/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 November 2014, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 October 2014.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kurt JÄGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 108, 11.4.2014, p. 16.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
p. 1 

## 3333 6 5 

# 0/9

0 T 2oo7-053/ ACETO Aceto Corporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 Tel : (516) 627 6000 Fax : (516) 627 6093 www .aceto.com February 16, 2011 Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 

# ~uqimhui~u,nupui~unup ;uui

ATTN : TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Re: Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, Ethanedioic Acid, CAS#144-62-7, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087 Dear Sir or Madam

: Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing Ethanedioic Acid, CAS#144-62-7 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as noted above. As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information: 

### (a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. ofthe test substance on which the application is based. Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, Ethanedioic Acid, CAS#144-62-7. (b) We are requesting an exemption fromall testing requirements for Ethanedioic Acid, CAS#144- 62-7 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we will no longer be conducting business activities with this chemical . (c) Name, address, and telephone number ofapplicant . ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 (d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information. Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETO Corporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 

# ~~

.~C~+rY~,~C RECD MAR 1 ~

. 2011 I I FES 23 AM6

: 07



# CONTAINS NO CBIAs per 40 CFR 790.99, ACETOCorporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our

application for exemption: I (ACETOCorporation) understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, ACETOCorporation must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. 

### If you have any further questions please contact me. Sincerely, Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETO Corporation