alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-10.19



 




	 	 	 	 	 
	(Quintiles Transnational Corp. Logo)	 	Quintiles Transnational Corp,
Post Office Box 13979

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3979
919 998 2000 / Fax 919 998 9113	 	EXHIBIT 10.19
	 	 	
http://www.quintiles.com	 	 



November 13, 2003



Ron Wooten

c/o Quintiles Transnational Corp.

4709 Creekstone Drive

Riverbirch Building, Suite 300

Durham, NC 27703


Re: Amendment to Executive Employment
Agreement

 Dear Ron:


Reference is made to the amendment to your Executive Employment Agreement
dated as of November 12, 2003 (the “Amendment”). This will confirm our
agreement that in lieu of the calculation of the 36 monthly severance
payments in the manner specified in paragraph 4 of the Amendment, each such
monthly payment will instead equal your monthly rate of base salary in effect
at the time of your termination of employment, multiplied by 1.55.


All other terms of the Executive Employment Agreement, as amended by the
Amendment, are unaffected by this letter, including the conditions that must
be met to receive or retain severance benefits.


Please confirm that this conforms to your understanding of our agreement by
signing below.


Sincerely yours,






Michael Mortimer

Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources


Agreed to and Accepted by:



	 	 	 
		 	
     11/14/03
	
	 	


	Ron Wooten	 	
Date
Sanitized Air

Emission

Analysis
467 P.2d 998

#### Cruz M. SEDILLO, II, Petitioner, v. Honorable Joe ANGEL, District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 9052.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 5, 1970.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and TACK-ETT, WATSON, SISK and McKENNA, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000561

21-JUN-2017

08:30 AM
### §866. Repealed. Aug. 6, 1947, ch. 504, §10(1), 61 Stat. 788

Section, act Jan. 31, 1925, ch. 121, 43 Stat. 802, related to seismological investigations. See section 883a of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2004 (the Report), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    THAD M.
BROWNThad M. Brown Chief Financial Officer


March 8, 2004
### §535b. Presidential approval; recommendations of Federal officials

No bridge may be constructed, maintained, and operated as provided in section 535 of this title unless the President has given his approval thereto. In the course of determining whether to grant such approval, the President shall secure the advice and recommendations of (1) the United States section of the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, in the case of a bridge connecting the United States and Mexico, and (2) the heads of such departments and agencies of the Federal Government as he deems appropriate to determine the necessity for such bridge.

(Pub. L. 92–434, §4, Sept. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 731.)
#### § 534.303 Basic pay for executive level positions.

Rates of basic pay for executive level positions of temporary organizations may not exceed the rate for level III of the Executive Schedule.

[69 FR 70362, Dec. 6, 2004]
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia
ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A222 3. CHRISTOPHER A . EVANS v. GEO RGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION. ChristopherA. Eva

ns appeale d to thi s Court from the superior court’s order dismis sing his petition for writ of mandam us. The Supreme C ourt, however, has e xclusive appellate jurisdiction over all cases involving extraordinary rem edies , including mandam us. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5); Ladzinske v. Allen , 280 Ga. 264 (626 SE 2d 83) (2006). This cas e is thus TR ANSFE RRED to the Supre me C ourt for di sposition. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify t hat the abo ve is a t

rue extract f

rom the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signa ture and the seal of said co urt hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 09/08/2014 September 08, 2014
---

---

Exhibit 12.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification

Required by Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

I, Rafi Amit, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 20-F of Camtek Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting, and

5. The companys other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b.
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal controls over financial
reporting.

|                    |                                 
|------------------- | --------------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2005 |                                 
|                    | By:   Rafi Amit                 
|                    |                                 
|                    | Name: Rafi Amit                 
|                    | Title: Chief Executive
  Officer



---

---
#### Saul Rabinovitz, Respondent, v. Allan C. Williamson et al., as Administrators with the Will Annexed of Charles D. Strang, Deceased, Appellants. David Rosen, Landlord, Appellant, v. Saul Rabinovitz, Tenant, Respondent, and “John Doe”, Undertenant.

*842Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [192 Misc. 975.]
### **CHAPTER 7—LEASE OF MINERAL DEPOSITS WITHIN ACQUIRED LANDS**

Sec.
351.
Definitions.
352.
Deposits subject to lease; consent of department heads; lands excluded.
353.
Sale of lands unaffected; reservation of mineral rights; sale subject to prior lease; naval petroleum reserves unaffected.
354.
Lease of partial or future interests in deposits.
355.
Disposition of receipts.
356.
Furnishing description of lands and title documents; recordation of documents; authenticated copies.
357.
State or local government rights; taxation.
358.
Rights under prior leases; priority of pending applications; exchange of leases.
359.
Rules and regulations.
360.
Authority to manage certain mineral leases.
§ 470.311 Final project approval. ( a ) The Office of Personnel Management will consider all timely relevant oral and written views, arguments, and data before final approval or disapproval of a project plan. OPM may request that the agency modify the tentatively approved project plan before final approval because of comments and data received from the Congress, the public, labor organizations, and affected employees. OPM will not permit the agency to implement the project until all required consultation or negotiation has been completed, including the conclusion of impasse resolution and negotiability disputes.
( b ) The Office of Personnel Management shall provide a copy of the final version of the project plan to each House of the Congress at least 90 days in advance of the date the project is to take effect.
( c ) Agencies involved in the project shall communicate the content of the final project plan to: ( 1 ) Labor organizations and affected employees; and
( 2 ) Individuals and groups known to be interested in the project's activities.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65165-65166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 2, 2019.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:

[[Page 65166]]

    1. Francis Philip Kavanaugh, Dana Point, California; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Friendly Hills Bank, Whittier, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 13, 
2018.
Yao-Chin Chao,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-27394 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[107th Congress Public Law 27]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ027.107]

[[Page 115 STAT. 207]]

Public Law 107-27
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the mandatory 
separation age for Federal firefighters be made the same as the age that 
 applies with respect to Federal law enforcement officers. <<NOTE: Aug. 
                        20, 2001 -  [H.R. 93]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Federal 
Firefighters Retirement Age Fairness Act.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. <<NOTE: 5 USC 101 note.>> 

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Firefighters Retirement Age 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY SEPARATION AGE FOR FIREFIGHTERS.

    (a) Civil Service Retirement System.--
            (1) In general.--The second sentence of section 8335(b) of 
        title 5, United States Code, is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``law 
                enforcement officer''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``that 
                officer''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 8335(b) of title 5, 
        United States Code, is amended by striking the first sentence.

    (b) Federal Employees' Retirement System.--
            (1) In general.--The second sentence of section 8425(b) of 
        title 5, United States Code, is amended--
                    (A) by inserting ``, firefighter,'' after ``law 
                enforcement officer'' each place it appears; and
                    (B) by striking ``courier'' the second place it 
                appears and inserting ``courier, as the case may be,''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 8425(b) of title 5, 
        United States Code, is amended by striking the first sentence.

    Approved August 20, 2001.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 93:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 147 (2001):
            Jan. 30, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**January / February 1999**

**Bosentan and the**
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-049 April 26, 2004

NRC TO DISCUSS QUALITY OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN INFORMATION

WITH DOE MAY 5 IN LAS VEGAS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the Department of Energy May 5 in Las

Vegas to discuss an NRC team evaluation report concerning the quality of certain DOE technical

information that DOE is preparing to support its expected application for a license to build and operate

a high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. 

The meeting will be held in the Embassy Suites Conference Center, Chancellor Ballroom, 3600

Paradise Road, Las Vegas, beginning at 8:30 a.m. (PDT). Following introductory comments from

NRC staff and the meeting facilitator, the NRC evaluation team will present and discuss its report with

DOE. Afterwards, at about 11:00 a.m., the NRC will entertain comments and questions from members

of the public. 

A copy of the NRC team evaluation report, “U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff

Evaluation of U.S. Department of Energy Analysis Model Reports, Process Controls, and Corrective

Actions,” is available on the NRC web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/waste/hlw-disposal/reg-initiatives/resolve-key-tech-issues.html .

An April 13 press release announcing issuance of the report is available at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2004/04-041.html .

###
§ 630.1113 Using donated annual leave. ( a ) Any donated annual leave an emergency leave recipient receives from an emergency leave transfer program may be used only for purposes related to the disaster or emergency for which the emergency leave recipient was approved. Each agency is responsible for ensuring that annual leave donated under the emergency leave transfer program is used appropriately.
( b ) Annual leave transferred under this subpart may be— ( 1 ) Substituted retroactively for any period of leave without pay used because of the adverse effects of the disaster or emergency; or
( 2 ) Used to liquidate an indebtedness incurred by the emergency leave recipient for advanced annual or sick leave used because of the adverse effects of the disaster or emergency. The agency may advance annual or sick leave, as appropriate (even if the employee has available annual and sick leave), so that the emergency leave recipient is not forced to use his or her accrued leave before donated annual leave becomes available.
# L_2017008EN.01001401.xml

| 12.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/14

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 184/2015

of 10 July 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2017/24]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive 2014/108/EU of 12 December 2014 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive 2014/108/EU of 12 December 2014 amending Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the list of defence-related products (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 3q (Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XIX of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 L 0108: Commission Directive 2014/108/EU of 12 December 2014 (OJ L 359, 16.12.2014, p. 117).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 L 0108: Commission Directive 2014/108/EU of 12 December 2014 (OJ L 359, 16.12.2014, p. 117).’

Article 2

The text of Directive 2014/108/EU in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 July 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Atle LEIKVOLL

---

(1)  
  OJ L 359, 16.12.2014, p. 117.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Hillsborough,

June, 1899.

#### Dube, *Adm’x, v.*Gay.

Case, to recover for injuries resulting in the death of the plaintiff’s intestate, Joseph Dube, while employed by the defendant in laying a sewer. The defendant’s motion to direct a verdict for him was denied, subject to exception.

*Charles J. Hamblett, Charles W. Hoitt, Charles H. Bums,*and *John H. JRiedell,*for the plaintiff.

*Jeremiah J: Doyle, George B. French,*and *Isaac ~W. Smith,*for the defendant.

Parsons, J.,

The motion should have been granted. There was no evidence that the defendant’s knowledge of the danger *671from which, the injuries resulted was, or in the exercise of due care could have been, superior to that of the plaintiff’s intestate, who was injured. The case discloses no evidence upon which the jury could properly find for the plaintiff.

*Verdict set aside: judgment for the defendant.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 470.103 Definitions.

In this part:

*Demonstration Project* means a project conducted by the Office of Personnel Management, or under its supervision, to determine whether a specified change in personnel management policies or procedures would result in improved Federal personnel management (5 U.S.C. 4701). The project must require the waiver of a provision of law, rule, or regulation which is eligible for waiver under the demonstration authority contained in 5 U.S.C. 4703. A project which can be undertaken under an agency's own authority and does not require the waiver of a provision of law, rule, or regulation is not considered a “demonstration project” for purposes of this part.

*Research* means systematic, intensive study directed toward fuller scientific knowledge or understanding of the subject studied. Activities classified as research are structured experimental or descriptive investigations conducted according to sound methodological principles.

*Research Program* means a planned study of the manner in which public management policies and systems are operating or have operated, the effects of those policies and systems, the possibilities for change, and comparisons among policies and systems.
### §11174. Reports

Recipients of grants made under this part shall submit to the Administrator such reports as may be reasonably requested by the Administrator to describe progress achieved in carrying out the projects for which such grants are made.

(Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §264, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12212, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1891.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 5668 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 470.301 Program expectations. ( a ) Demonstration projects permit the Office of Personnel Management and Federal agencies to test alternative personnel management concepts in controlled situations to determine the likely effects and ramifications of proposed changes before putting them into general effect. OPM will assist agencies, within available resources, in developing projects which demonstrate new or improved personnel methods.
( b ) The demonstration project must be proposed in a research context. The project plan must include a research design which contains: ( 1 ) Measurable goals or objectives;
( 2 ) Acceptable expected results or outcomes;
( 3 ) A description of the procedures, methods and techniques to be demonstrated in achieving the desired goals or objectives;
( 4 ) An evaluation section describing the data collection and analysis procedures to be used to assess the success or failure of the project from a qualitative and quantitative standpoint; and
( 5 ) An itemization of all costs and benefits associated with the project, to the agency, the Government, and the community.
( c ) OPM may establish and maintain activities which publish, exchange and apply the results of demonstration projects.
( d ) OPM may seek legislation, or to the extent already authorized by law, make changes in regulation to implement permanently successful procedures, techniques, new management knowledge, and materials which improve personnel management programs or techniques.
§ 532.223 Establishments included in regular nonappropriated fund surveys. ( a ) All establishments having 20 or more employees in the prescribed industries within a survey area must be included in the survey universe. Establishments in NAICS codes 4571, 71391, and 71395 must be included in the survey universe if they have eight or more employees.
( b ) Establishment selection procedures are the same as those prescribed for appropriated fund surveys in paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 532.213 of this subpart.
[55 FR 46143, Nov. 1, 1990, as amended at 71 FR 35374, June 20, 2006; 89 FR 4540, Jan. 24, 2024]