alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.308 Effecting employment by transfer. ( a ) *Authority to approve transfers.* On written request by an international organization for the services of an employee, the agency may authorize the transfer of the employee to the organization for any period not to exceed 5 years, except that when the Secretary of State determines it to be in the national interest, a period of employment by transfer may be extended, subject to the approval of the head of the agency, for up to an additional 3 years. A transfer or series of transfers or combination of details and transfers shall not exceed 8 years in the aggregate. Refusal by the head of the agency to authorize the transfer or the extension of the transfer is not reviewable by or appealable to OPM.
( b ) *Letter of consent.* When an agency consents to the transfer of an employee, the agency shall give its consent in writing to the international organization and shall furnish the employee with a copy of the consent.
( c ) *Effective date.* The agency and the international organization shall establish the effective date of transfer by mutual agreement.
( d ) *Recording requirement.* The agency must furnish the employee with a leave statement, showing his or her annual and sick leave balances at the time of transfer. In addition, the notification of personnel action effecting the employee's separation for transfer must include: ( 1 ) Identification of the international organization to which the employee is transferring,
( 2 ) A clear statement of the period during which the employee has reemployment rights in the agency under section 3582 of title 5, United States Code, and this subpart, and
( 3 ) The legal and regulatory conditions for reemployment.
[35 FR 16525, Oct. 23, 1970, as amended at 73 FR 64860, Oct. 31, 2008]
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1616

To authorize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther King, 

Junior, National Historic Site for lands owned by the City of Atlanta, 

Georgia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To authorize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin 

Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site for lands 

owned by the City of Atlanta, Georgia, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Martin Luther King, 

5 Junior, National Historic Site Land Exchange Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 
2

•HR 1616 IH 

1 (1) Public Law 96–438 established the Martin 

2 Luther King, Junior, National Historic Site, and al3 lows acquisition, by donation only, of lands owned by 

4 the State. 

5 (2) The National Park Service owns a vacant 

6 lot that has no historic significance. The City of At7 lanta has expressed interest in acquiring this prop8 erty to encourage commercial development along 

9 Edgewood Avenue. 

10 (3) The National Historic Site Visitor Center 

11 and Museum is land-locked and has no emergency 

12 ingress or egress, making it virtually impossible for 

13 firefighting equipment to reach. 

14 (4) The acquisition of city-owned property 

15 would enable the National Park Service to establish 

16 easy street access to the National Historic Site Vis17 itor Center and Museum, and would benefit the City 

18 by exchanging a piece of property that the City 

19 could develop. 

20 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to author21 ize the exchange of certain lands within the Martin Luther 

22 King, Junior, National Historic Site for lands owned by 

23 the City of Atlanta, Georgia. 
3

•HR 1616 IH 

1 SEC. 3. LAND EXCHANGE. 

2 Section 2(b)(1) of the Act of October 10, 1980 (Pub3 lic Law 96–428; 94 Stat. 1839; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) is 

4 amended by striking the period and inserting ‘‘or ex5 change.’’.

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.402 Coverage.

This subpart applies to all officers, as defined in § 352.403(b), of any branch of the Federal Government.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-027 February 17, 2006

NRC ISSUES FINAL SAFETY EVALUATION FOR

 CLINTON EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has updated its safety evaluation report (SER) for an

Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Clinton site, which is located about six miles east of Clinton, Ill.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The

Clinton application was filed Sept. 25, 2003, by Exelon Generation Company, LLC. If approved, the

permit would give Exelon up to 20 years to decide whether to build one or more nuclear plants on the

site and to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

The SER summarizes the NRC staff's technical evaluation of the Clinton site’s suitability in

terms of seismology, geology, and other environmental and safety factors. Along with completing the

SER, the staff must complete an Environmental Impact Statement, the Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards must issue a report on the ESP application, and the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

must conclude its hearing on the matter before the Commission can reach a final decision on issuing

the ESP. The NRC expects to finish this process by early 2007.

Exelon will have 14 days to review the SER for proprietary information. The report will then

be available electronically to the public in the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike,

Rockville, Md. It will also be available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/newlicensing/esp/clinton.html . In addition, the Vespasian Warner Public Library in Clinton has agreed to

make the SER available for public inspection.

###
****Important Information about your Email.com account** **Your e-mail account powered by Mail.com is getting a new look! Starting immediately, you will login to your account at the following URL:
www.mail.com
Please be sure to bookmark this new page - this is the only page where you can access your e-mail account in the future. Your e-mail address and password have remained the same and all  your saved mail and folders will be available.
*Be sure you enter your full e-mail address and password to login to www.mail.com*

You should find the new look to be very similar to the site you are used to, with just a few changes. Most importantly, you should find the new site to be faster and more reliable. You will also have some new features like Mail.com E-Mail Alert which allows you to automatically be notified when you have new e-mail without being logged in.
Click to login now and check out the new look!
If you have any problems, please contact Customer Support at [email protected]****
#### Jules Chopak, Respondent, v. William H. Walker, Appellant.

Present — Holán, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 669.]
FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATION

			             EXHIBIT 31

			           CERTIFICATIONS


I, Steven B. Chotin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fund America Investors
Corporation II;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified any material weaknesses
in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 12, 2005				/s/ Steven B. Chotin
      ---------------				--------------------
							Steven B. Chotin
							Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the use of our report dated February 17, 2003 in respect of the
consolidated financial statements of iDLX Holdings BV and Subsidiary as of and
for year ended December 31, 2002 (not presented separately herein) in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of eFunds Corporation and its incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-51568, 333-51564,
333-51536 and 333-44830) of eFunds Corporation.

/s/ S.R. Batliboi & Associates

Chennai, India
March 28, 2003
IIB 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1505

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 1, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2127 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North 

Carolina, as the ‘‘Jim Richardson Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1505 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 2127 Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, North 

4 Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jim Rich5 ardson Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Jim Richardson Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 31, 

2003. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
### §524. Applicability of administrative procedure provisions

In the administration of this Act, hearings and other procedures shall be exempted from the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, except as to the requirements of section 552 of title 5.

(July 16, 1952, ch. 889, §3, 66 Stat. 733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act July 16, 1952, ch. 889, 66 Stat. 732, which enacted this section and amended sections 511, 516, and 523 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act June 21, 1940, ch. 409, 54 Stat. 497, which comprises this subchapter.

"Subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5" and "section 552 of title 5" substituted in text for "the Administrative Procedure Act (60 Stat. 237)" and "section 3 thereof", respectively, on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Timothy T. Page, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Lion Capital Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date: May 11, 2004 | By: /s/ Timothy T. Page                                               
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   | Timothy T. Page, Chief Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00716

- CR

LEANDREW SMITH , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1376700

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated sexual assault, and the trial

court assessed punishment, enhanced by one prior conviction, at confinement for
55 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without me rit. The brief meets the requirements of2

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807
, 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of thi s date, more than
60 days ha ve passed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in
the record. We are no t to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for
review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the tri al court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2( b).
### **CHAPTER 5A—EXEMPTION OF NAVY OR COAST GUARD VESSELS FROM CERTAIN NAVIGATION RULES**
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN LAMSON        
|                      |  |  |  | John Lamson            
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,
whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
§ 531.414 Interim within-grade increase. ( a ) An interim within-grade increase shall be granted to an employee who has: ( 1 ) Appealed a negative within-grade increase determination to the Merit Systems Protection Board under 5 U.S.C 5335(c); and
( 2 ) Been granted a favorable within-grade increase determination under the interim relief provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7701(b)(2).
( b ) An interim within-grade increase granted under paragraph (a) of this section shall become effective on the date of the appellate decision ordering interim relief under 5 U.S.C. 7701(b)(2)(A).
( c ) If the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board upholds the negative within-grade increase determination, an interim within-grade increase granted under this section shall be terminated on the date of the Board's final decision.
( d ) If the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board overturns the negative within-grade increase determination, an interim within-grade increase granted under this section shall be made permanent and shall be granted retroactively to the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after completion of the applicable waiting period.
( e ) An employee may not appeal the termination of an interim within-grade increase under paragraph (c) of this section.
[57 FR 3712, Jan. 31, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 24030, May 10, 1994; 59 FR 65703, Dec. 21, 1994]
|  |  | CNET tech sites:Price comparisons|Product reviews|Tech news|Downloads|Site map |  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
|  |  |
|  |  |  | TelevisionsMusicDigital CamerasCamcordersHandheldsDesktopsNotebooksComponentsPeripheralsMore »  CNET : Shopper : ****Most popular products**** |  |
|--|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
#### In re: Pamela M. ERWIN, Debtor, Pamela M. Erwin, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Federal Metals Credit Union, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 01-35120.

D.C. No. CV-00-06314-AA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2002.

Decided May 20, 2002.

*556Before TROTT and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Pamela M. Erwin appeals the district court’s dismissal of her appeal and affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s decision. We affirm. Assuming, for the purpose of this decision, that the wages in question were indeed the property of the estate, as Erwin argues, and not of the Credit Union, we nonetheless conclude that the property did not revert to Erwin and that she therefore lacks standing.

The estate did not formally abandon the property pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 554(a), and Erwin never forced abandonment under 11 U.S.C. § 554(b). The property was not scheduled and thus did not revert to the debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 554(c).1 Finally, the property was not administered. Accordingly, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 554(d), it remained property of the estate,2 and Erwin lacks any interest in it sufficient to confer standing.3

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the decision of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. We do not imply that the property should have been scheduled; we merely note that it was not. *Cf. Cusano v. Klein,*264 F.3d 936, 947 (9th Cir.2001) (noting that, as a general rule, "a debtor has no duty to schedule a cause of action that did not accrue prior to bankruptcy”).

2

. *See Sierra Switchboard Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.,*789 F.2d 705, 709 (9th Cir.1986).

3

. *Moneymaker v. CoBen (In re Eisen),*31 F.3d 1447, 1451 n. 2 (9th Cir.1994) (stating the rule that the bankruptcy trustee, as the representative of the bankruptcy estate, is "the only party with standing” to prosecute causes of action belonging to the estate) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).