alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTExhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Clyde R. Parks, certify that:1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Moliris Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.September 2, 2005/s/ Clyde R. ParksClyde R. Parks Principal Executive Officer
30
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed February 18 , 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00838

- CV

RICHARD MCKINNEY , Appellant V. DEL

- JEN, INC., NORTH TEX AS JOB CORPS CENTER, MARIA T. MARTIN, AND LANA KITE , Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 04888



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Brown O pinion by Justice Brown Before the Court is appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellees contend the

appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not file a response to

appellees’ motion.

In a letter dated July 3, 2013, the Cou rt informed appellant that his brief was deficient

and instructed him to file an amended brief correcting the deficiencies within thirty days. The

Court cautioned appellant that failure to file an amended brief within the time requested may

result in dism issal of the appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not

filed an amended brief. Appellant did not file a response to the motion to dismiss.– 2

– Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.3(b).

130838F.P05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RICHARD MCKINNEY, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00838

- CV V.

DEL

- JEN, INC., NORTH TEXAS JOB CORPS CENTER, MARIA T. MARTIN, AND LANA KITE, Appellees On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 04888. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Justices Bridges and O’Neill, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that appellees, DEL

- JEN, INC., NORTH TEXAS JOB CORPS CENTER, MARIA T. MARTIN, AND LANA KITE, recover their costs of this appeal from appellant, RICHARD MCKINNEY.

Judgment entered this 18 th day of February, 2014.

/Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN JUSTICE
### §12262. Requirements

For the purpose of placing Federal participants in a family unity demonstration project under section 12261 of this title, the Attorney General shall consult with the Secretary of Health and Human Services regarding the development and operation of the project.

(Pub. L. 103–322, title III, §31922, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1896.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 13902 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Exhibit 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION

              Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                    Pursuant to Section 906 of the
          Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Invicta Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard David Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods presented in this Report.



Date:  August 20, 2007	By: /s/ Richard David Scott
			Richard David Scott
			Chief Financial Officer
# L_2016093EN.01002901.xml

| 7.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/29

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 17/2015

of 25 February 2015

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2016/505]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EU) No 605/2014 of 5 June 2014 amending, for the purposes of introducing hazard and precautionary statements in the Croatian language and its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EU) No 605/2014 of 5 June 2014 amending, for the purposes of introducing hazard and precautionary statements in the Croatian language and its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 12zze (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32014 R 0605: Commission Regulation (EU) No 605/2014 of 5 June 2014 (OJ L 167, 6.6.2014, p. 36).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32014 R 0605: Commission Regulation (EU) No 605/2014 of 5 June 2014 (OJ L 167, 6.6.2014, p. 36).’

Article 2

The text of Regulation (EU) No 605/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 February 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 February 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 167, 6.6.2014, p. 36.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-07-0209 - Status of the Decommissioning Program - 2007 Annual Report.

Accession Number: ML071930270

Date Released: Monday, December 17, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML072620120 - SECY-07-0209 - Status of the Decommissioning Program - 2007 Annual Report. (5 page(s), 11/30/2007)
    - ML072620106 - SECY-07-0209 - Enclosure 1: Operational Effectiveness Chart. (1 page(s), 11/30/2007)
    - ML072620090 - SECY-07-0209 - Enclosure 2: 2007 Annual Report - Decommissioning Program (36 page(s), 11/30/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6824
DAWN MAUREEN EGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICIA L. HAUFFMAN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-180-A) Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 21, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dawn Maureen Egan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dawn Maureen Egan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that her constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Egan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §579f. Budgetary evaluation metrics and transparency; public participation

#### (a) Omitted

#### (b) Budgetary evaluation metrics and transparency

Beginning in fiscal year 2020, in the formulation of the annual budget request for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Civil Works) pursuant to section 1105(a) of title 31, the President shall ensure that such budget request—

(1) aligns the assessment of the potential benefit-cost ratio for budgeting water resources development projects with that used by the Corps of Engineers during project plan formulation and evaluation pursuant to section 1962d–17 of title 42; and

(2) demonstrates the transparent criteria and metrics utilized by the President in the evaluation and selection of water resources development projects included in such budget request.

#### (c) Public participation

In the development of, or any proposed major substantive modification to, a proposed budget for water resources development projects, the Secretary, through each District shall, not less frequently than annually—

(1) provide to non-Federal interests and other interested stakeholders information on the proposed budget for projects or substantive modifications to project budgets within each District's jurisdiction;

(2) hold multiple public meetings to discuss the budget for projects within each District's jurisdiction; and

(3) provide to non-Federal interests the opportunity to collaborate with District personnel for projects within each District's jurisdiction—

(A) to support information sharing; and

(B) to the maximum extent practicable, to share in concept development and decisionmaking to achieve complementary or integrated solutions to problems.

(Pub. L. 115–270, title I, §1154, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3791.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 1154 of Pub. L. 115–270. Subsec. (a) of section 1154 of Pub. L. 115–270 amended section 579a of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 102 of Pub. L. 115–270, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Order entered February 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00927-CR

No. 05-12-00928-CR

STEVEN ROCHA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-55213-P, F10-58318-P

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Lisabeth Kellett’s January 29, 2013 motion for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record.

We ORDER Ms. Kellett to file the reporter’s record within TEN DAYS from the date of 

this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1919 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1919

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize transportation on 
   military aircraft on a space-available basis for veterans with a 
         service-connected disability rated 50 percent or more.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2003

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize transportation on 
   military aircraft on a space-available basis for veterans with a 
         service-connected disability rated 50 percent or more.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE 
              BASIS FOR VETERANS WITH A SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY 
              RATED 50 PERCENT OR MORE.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 157 of title 10, United States Code, 
is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 2647 Space-available travel on Department of Defense aircraft: 
              veterans with service-connected disabilities rated 50 
              percent or more
    ``The Secretary of Defense shall provide transportation on 
Department of Defense aircraft on a space-available bases for veterans 
with service-connected disabilities rated by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs as 50 percent or more disabling, and for the dependents of such 
veterans, on the same basis as such transportation is provided to 
members of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer pay and 
their dependents.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``2647. Space-available travel on Department of Defense aircraft: 
                            veterans with service-connected 
                            disabilities rated 50 percent or more .''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 2647 of title 10, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall take effect at the end of the 90-day 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1312.4 Classified designations. ( a ) Except as provided by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 2011) or the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, (50 U.S.C. 401) Executive Order 12958 provides the only basis for classifying information. Information which meets the test for classification may be classified in one of the following three designations: ( 1 ) *Top Secret.* This classification shall be applied only to information the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.
( 2 ) *Secret.* This classification shall be applied only to information the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.
( 3 ) *Confidential.* This classification shall be applied only to information the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.
( b ) If there is significant doubt about the need to classify information, it shall not be classified. If there is significant doubt about the appropriate level of classification, it shall be classified at the lower level.
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.504 Basic entitlement.

Subject to the conditions specified in this subpart, an employee who is appointed to a position under authority of section 233(d) or section 625(b) of the Act is entitled, on termination of that appointment for any reason other than his or her own misconduct or delinquency, to be reinstated in his or her former position or in one of like seniority, status, and pay in the same agency. When the employee's right is to a position in the SES, reinstatement may be to any position in the SES for which the employee is qualified. The employee shall be returned at not less than the SES rate of basic pay as determined under 5 CFR part 534, subpart D at which the employee was being paid immediately before his or her transfer. If the functions with which the employee's former position was identified have been transferred to another agency, the employee's right to reinstatement is in the gaining agency.

[51 FR 25188, July 11, 1986]
----

**Exhibit        32**

**CERTIFICATION          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|  | (1) | The                    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc.                    (the                    “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”)                    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                    of the                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of                    the                    Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                                                                                    |                                         |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Dated: May                    14, 2007 |                                                                                                                                    | /s/ Richard                    T. Brock |
|                                        | Richard                      T. BrockChief                      Executive Officer and Principal                      Accounting Officer |
§ 630.910 Termination of medical emergency. ( a ) The medical emergency affecting a leave recipient shall terminate— ( 1 ) When the leave recipient's Federal service is terminated;
( 2 ) At the end of the biweekly pay period in which the leave recipient's employing agency receives written notice from the leave recipient or from a personal representative of the leave recipient that the leave recipient is no longer affected by a medical emergency;
( 3 ) At the end of the biweekly pay period in which the leave recipient's employing agency determines, after written notice from the agency and an opportunity for the leave recipient (or, if appropriate, a personal representative of the leave recipient) to answer orally or in writing, that the leave recipient is no longer affected by a medical emergency; or
( 4 ) At the end of the biweekly pay period in which the leave recipient's employing agency receives notice that the Office of Personnel Management has approved an application for disability retirement for the leave recipient under the Civil Service Retirement System or the Federal Employees' Retirement System.
( b ) The leave recipient's employing agency shall continuously monitor the status of the medical emergency affecting the leave recipient to ensure that the leave recipient continues to be affected by a medical emergency.
( c ) When the medical emergency affecting a leave recipient terminates, no further requests for transfer of annual leave to the leave recipient may be granted, and any unused transferred annual leave remaining to the credit of the leave recipient shall be restored to the leave donors under § 630.911.
( d ) An agency may deem a medical emergency to continue for the purpose of providing a leave recipient an adequate period of time within which to receive donations of annual leave.