alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Joseph S. Podolski, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Zonagen, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: May 1, 2006 By: /s/ Joseph S. Podolski         Joseph S. Podolski    President and    Chief Executive Officer    Zonagen, Inc.
#### § 353.303 Restoration rights of TAPER employees.

An employee serving in the competitive service under a temporary appointment pending establishment of a register (TAPER) under § 316.201 of this chapter (other than an employee serving in a position classified above GS-15), is entitled to be restored to the position he or she left or an equivalent one in the same commuting area.
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jean Paul Roy

------------------------





Jean Paul Roy

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 10, 2005
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-110 September 14, 2006

 NRC ISSUES NEW EDITION OF INFORMATION DIGEST

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its 2006-2007 edition of the Information

Digest containing up-to-date information about the agency, domestic and worldwide nuclear energy,

nuclear materials safety, and radioactive waste in an easy-to-use format. 

This edition, NUREG-1350, Volume 18, provides an expanded discussion about future U.S.

commercial nuclear power reactor licensing. It also features updated design, graphics, and illustrations

as well as visual cues for easier reference.

The Information Digest, published annually, provides a compilation of NRC-related and

nuclear-related data and is intended to serve as a quick reference to major facts about the agency and

the industry it regulates. It is available electronically at: http://www.nrc.gov in the lower right-hand

corner of the NRC’s homepage. It may also be purchased from the U.S. Government Printing Office

(Tel. 202-512-1800) or the National Technical Information Service (Tel. 1-800-553-6847).

 ###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63187-63188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24357]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 10 a.m. (Open Portion), 
10:15 a.m. (Closed Portion).

[[Page 63188]]


Place: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Meeting Open to the Public from 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. Closed 
portion will commence at 10:15 a.m. (approx.).

Matters To Be Considered:
    1. President's Report.
    2. Approval of September 9, 2004 Minutes (Open Portion).

FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.).
    1. Finance Project--Global.
    2. Insurance Project--Israel.
    3. Finance Project--Southeast Europe.
    4. Approval of September 9, 2004 Minutes (Closed Portion).
    5. Pending Major Projects.
    6. Reports.

Contact Person for Information: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

    Dated: October 27, 2004.
Connie M. Downs,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 04-24357 Filed 10-27-04; 2:20 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
### **CHAPTER 31—OCEAN POLLUTION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND MONITORING PLANNING**
§ 1215.30 Collection services. ( a ) The MSPB may contract for collection services to recover outstanding debts. The MSPB may refer delinquent debts to private collection agencies listed on the schedule compiled by the General Services Administration. In such contracts, the MSPB will retain the authority to resolve disputes, compromise claims, terminate or suspend collection, and refer the matter to the Department of Justice or the General Accounting Office.
( b ) The contractor shall be subject to the disclosure provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a(m)), and to applicable Federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to debt collection practices, including the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692. The contractor shall be strictly accountable for all amounts collected.
( c ) The contractor shall be required to provide to the MSPB any data contained in its files relating to the debt account upon agency request or upon returning an account to the MSPB for referral to the Department of Justice for litigation.
§ 531.242 Setting pay upon loss of GM status. ( a ) On loss of status as a GM employee under § 531.241 (except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section), an employee must receive his or her existing payable rate of basic pay, plus any of the following adjustments that may be applicable on the effective date of the loss of status, in the order specified: ( 1 ) The amount of any annual adjustment in GS rates under 5 U.S.C. 5303, and the amount of any adjustment in locality payments or special rate supplements, to which the employee otherwise would be entitled on that date;
( 2 ) The amount of any within-grade increase to which the employee otherwise would be entitled on that date under 5 U.S.C. 5335 and subpart D of this part;
( 3 ) The amount resulting from a promotion effective on that date (consistent with § 531.243(c));
( 4 ) In the case of an employee who loses GM status without a change of grade and whose GS rate falls between two steps of a GS grade, the amount of any increase needed to pay the employee the rate for the next higher step of that grade; and
( 5 ) In the case of an employee whose resulting GS rate is below the minimum rate of a GS grade, the amount of any increase needed to pay the employee the minimum rate for that grade.
( b ) For an employee who loses status as a GM employee as a result of a demotion, pay must be set as provided in § 531.215. A GM employee's off-step GS rate at the grade before demotion is not converted to a GS step rate before the demotion, but the employee must be placed on a GS step rate when pay is set in the lower grade.
#### In the Matter of the Application for Ancillary Letters Testamentary on the Last Will and Testament of George W. Horton, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, upon condition that appellant file her bond within fifteen days after the service of the order to toe entered herein, and notice of entry; otherwise, motion granted, with costs. Present — Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.
Exhibit 8.1
-----------

Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
Legal Name                                  Place of incorporation            Doing Business as                 Ownership %(1)
----------                                  ----------------------            -----------------                 --------------


<S>                                                 <C>                       <C>                               <C>
LanChile Cargo S.A.                                 Chile                     Lan Chile Cargo                   99.85%
     Aircraft International Leasing Limited         Bahamas                   AILL                              99.98%
     Trasnporte Aereo S.A.                          Chile                     LanExpress                        99.9%
     Seagull Leasing LLC                            Delaware, USA             Seagull                          100%
     Southflorida Air Cargo                         Florida, USA              Southflorida                     100%
     Bluebird Leasing LLC                           Delaware, USA             Bluebird                         100%
     Lanlogistics Corp.                             Delaware, USA             Lanlogistics                     100%
     Lan Cargo  Overseas Services Limited           Bahamas                   Lan Cargo Overseas               100%
Condor Leasing LLC                                  Delaware, USA             Condor                           100%
Lan Peru S.A.                                       Peru                      Lan Peru                          49%
Eagle Leasing LLC                                   Delaware, USA             Eagle                            100%
Inversiones Lan S.A.                                Chile                     Inverlan                          99.7%
Inmobiliaria Aeronautica S.A.                       Chile                     Inmobiliaria Aeronautica          99.01%

</TABLE>

----------------
(1)   Ownership percentage of direct owner of each significant subsidiary of
      Lanchile.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2003-16409; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-78]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Sidney, NE.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, February 19, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2524.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 20, 2003 (68 FR 65389). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on February 19, 2004. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on December 18, 2003.

Paul J. Sheridan,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.

[FR Doc. 04-242  Filed 1-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
No. 68903 

# F ILED MAR 30 2016
CIE K. LINEMAN

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JOSHUA SMITH, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE LISA M. BROWN, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and KENT F. PETERSEN; AND VANESSA LUCIDO, Real Parties in Interest.



### ORDER DISMISSING PETITION Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this writ petition is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Lisa M. Brown, District Judge, Family Court Division Hofland & Tomsheck Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Willick Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
(0)-1947 

# 110-ocict,s2_
EXHIBIT 23     CONSENT OF    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM     The Board of Directors    Hanmi Financial Corporation:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration    statements (Nos.    333-118733    and    333-117753)    on    Form S-3    and the registration statements (Nos.    333-122482    and    333-115753)    on    Form S-8    of Hanmi Financial Corporation of our reports dated    February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance    sheets of Hanmi Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of    December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated    statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity    and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years    in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of    December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the    December 31, 2007 annual report on    Form 10-K    of Hanmi Financial Corporation.     /s/ KPMG LLP     Los Angeles, California    February 29, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-40726

Summary Calendar

ASHLEY B. WOMACK, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

RUSTIN P. WRIGHT, 

 Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CV-567

Before WIENER, HAYNES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rustin Wright appeals the district court’s order remanding this case, 

originally a family law case, back to the state court for want of federal 

jurisdiction. For starters, we note that we lack jurisdiction to address any of 

the grounds Wright raises save and except his argument that 28 U.S.C. § 1443 

provides a ground for removal. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d); Dunn v. Miller, 695 F. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 26, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-40726 Document: 00515248754 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/26/2019
No. 19-40726

2

App’x 799, 800 (5th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we address only the § 1443 

arguments and dismiss the remainder for want of jurisdiction.

As to § 1443, we concur with the district court’s analysis that this case 

does not meet the standards of that statute, which is grounded in racial 

equality. See Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780 (1966); see also Dunn, 695 F. 

App’x at 800 (collecting cases). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s § 

1443 determination for essentially the same reasons stated by the district 

court.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

 Case: 19-40726 Document: 00515248754 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/26/2019
#### Moses Horowitz, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. John C. Eidt, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 300.701 Statutory requirement.

Section 3328 of title 5 of the United States Code provides that—

(a) An individual—

(1) Who was born after December 31, 1959, and is or was required to register under section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 453); and

(2) Who is not so registered or knowingly and willfully did not so register before the requirement terminated or became inapplicable to the individual, shall be ineligible for appointment to a position in an executive agency of the Federal Government.

(b) The Office of Personnel Management, in consultation with the Director of the Selective Service System, shall prescribe regulations to carry out this section. Such regulations shall include provisions prescribing procedures for the adjudication within the Office of determinations of whether a failure to register was knowing and willful. Such procedures shall require that such a determination may not be made if the individual concerned shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the failure to register was neither knowing nor willful.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1374** 

In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, JR., a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 2:99

- cr - 00362

- DCN

- 1 )

Submitted : May 1 8 , 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD , DIAZ , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Arthur F. Jones , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Arthur F. Jones, Jr. , petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to remand his criminal case to state court

. * We conclude that Jones is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and s hould be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)
. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin C orp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Jones is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

* Jones mailed a courtesy copy of the instant petition to the district court, which then proceeded to docket the petition in a new civil case. Jones v. United States , No. 6:16

- cv - 01059

- MBS (D.S.C., PACER No. 1). We understand Jones’ petition to be directe d to this c ourt.
#### § 1312.37 Fees.

There will normally be no fees charged for the mandatory review of classified material for declassification under this section.
#### The Knickerbocker Life Insurance Company, Appellant, *v.*George T. Patterson, Assignee, etc., et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 1, 1878;

decided November 12, 1878.)

The complaint in this action alleged, in substance, that plaintiff executed to McDonald, Dillout & Company, a corporation organized under the laws of this State, certain premises in the city of New York for the term of five years from May 1, 1874. That the lease was assigned by said corporation to defendant Patterson, who entered into possession February 20, 1875, and continued in possession until May 1, 1875. The action was to recover a quarter’s rent falling due by the terms of the lease on that day.

*590It appeared that on February 15, 1875, said corporation having became insolvent, an agreement was entered into, in which plaintiff and defendant and the other creditors of the company joined, advising an assignment by it for the benefit of creditors, and which provided that the rent then due and which should accrue on the lease up to May 1, 1875, should be deemed a valid claim against the company, and should be paid *pro rata*under the contemplated assignment. The creditors executing it agreed to accept the amount they should receive under the assignment “ in full satisfaction of their respective claims against the company.” An assignment was made as contemplated by the agreement February 21, 1875, and in pursuance of the request of the creditors, Patterson accepted the trust primarily as appointee and agent of the creditors. *Held,*that Patterson could not be charged personally as assignee of the lease, also that the fact that the assignment was set aside as void under the statute, did not impose such liability, as it would be in contravention of the agreement.

*F. C. Cantine*for appellant.

*J. Hampden Dougherty*for respondent.

Andrews, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent. Judgment affirmed.