64274 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2004 / Notices 

to initiate the broadcast of a digital 

television signal. Public television 

stations rely largely on community 

financial support to operate. In many 

rural areas the cost of the transition to 

digital broadcasting may exceed 

community resources. Since rural 

communities depend on public 

television stations for services ranging 

from educational course content in their 

schools to local news, weather, and 

agricultural reports, any disruption of 

public television broadcasting would be 

detrimental. 

Initiating a digital broadcast requires 

the installation of a new antenna, 

transmitter or translator, and new digital 

program management facilities 

consisting of processing and storage 

systems. Public television stations use a 

combination of transmitters and 

translators to serve the rural public. If 

the public television station is to 

perform program origination functions, 

as most do, digital cameras, editing and 

mastering systems are required. A new 

studio-to-tower site communications 

link may be required to transport the 

digital broadcast signal to each 

transmitter and translator. The 

capability to broadcast some 

programming in a high definition 

television format is inherent in the 

digital television standard, and this can 

require additional facilities at the 

studio. These are the new components 

of the digital transition. 

In designing the national competition 

for the distribution of these grant funds, 

priority is given to public television 

stations serving the areas that would be 

most unable to fund the digital 

transition without a grant. The largest 

sources of funding for public television 

stations are public membership and 

business contributions. In rural areas, 

lower population density reduces the 

field of membership, and rural areas 

have fewer businesses per capita than 

urban and suburban areas. Therefore, 

rurality is a primary predictor of the 

need for grant funding for a public 

television station’s digital transition. In 

addition, some rural areas have per 

capita income levels that are lower than 

the national average, and public 

television stations covering these areas 

in particular are likely to have difficulty 

funding the digital transition. As a 

result, the consideration of the per 

capita income of a public television 

station’s coverage area is a secondary 

predictor of the need for grant funding. 

Finally, some public television stations 

may face special difficulty 

accomplishing the transition, and a 

third scoring factor for station hardship 

will account for conditions that make 

these public television stations less 

likely to accomplish the digital 

transition without a grant. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 21 hours per 

response. 

Respondents: Not-for-profit 

institutions; State, Local or Tribal 

Government. 

Estimated Number of Respondents:

50. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 1.12. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 1,168 hours. 

Copies of this information collection 

can be obtained from MaryPat Daskal, 

Program Development and Regulatory 

Analysis, at (202) 720–7853. FAX: (202) 

720–4120 

All responses to this notice will be 

summarized and included in the request 

for OMB approval. All comments will 

also become a matter of public record.

Dated: October 29, 2004. 

Curtis M. Anderson, 

Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.

[FR Doc. 04–24604 Filed 11–3–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–15–P

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD 

INVESTIGATION BOARD 

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, November 16, 

2004, at 7 p.m. local time.

PLACE: North West Georgia Trade and 

Convention Center, Lecture Hall 

Theater, 2211 Dug Gap Battle Road, 

Dalton, Georgia, (Telephone No. 1–800–

824–7469).

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The 

Chemical Safety and Hazard 

Investigation Board (CSB) is convening 

a community meeting in connection 

with its investigation of a toxic gas 

release that occurred on April 12, 2004, 

at the MFG Chemical Inc. facility 

located in Dalton, Georgia. 

At the meeting CSB staff will present 

their preliminary investigative findings 

to the Board, including a summary of 

the incident. There will also be a panel 

discussion consisting of five emergency 

response organizations. After the staff 

presentations the Board will allow time 

for public comment. 

All staff presentations are preliminary 

and are intended solely to allow the 

Board to consider in a public forum the 

issues and factors involved in the 

incident. Factual analyses, conclusions, 

or findings contained in the staff 

presentations should not be considered 

final. 

This meeting will be open to the 

public. Please notify CSB if a translator 

or interpreter is needed, at least five (5) 

business days prior to the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Daniel Horowitz, (202) 261–7600.

Dated: November 1, 2004. 

Christopher W. Warner, 

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 04–24701 Filed 11–2–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6350–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Docket 49–2004] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 15—Kansas City, 

MO, Application for Subzone, Pfizer, 

Inc. (Pharmaceutical Products) 

An application has been submitted to 

the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board 

(the Board), by the Greater Kansas City 

Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 

15, requesting special-purpose subzone 

status for the manufacturing facilities of 

Pfizer, Inc. (Pfizer), in the Lee’s Summit, 

Missouri, area, within the Kansas City 

Missouri Customs port of entry. The 

application was submitted pursuant to 

the provisions of the Foreign-Trade 

Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–

81u), and the regulations of the Board 

(15 CFR part 400). It was formally filed 

on October 29, 2004. 

Pfizer’s plant (104 acres) is located at 

One Pfizer Way, Lee’s Summit, Jackson 

County, Missouri. The facility 

(approximately 235 employees) is used 

for the manufacture, processing, 

warehousing and distribution of 

pharmaceuticals, as well as for research 

and development activities. Pfizer will 

use zone procedures at the Lee’s 

Summit plant to manufacture 

Revolution (TM), (HTSUS 

3004.90.9103), a topical parasiticide for 

dogs and cats. The activity related to the 

manufacture of Revolution (TM) 

involves the use of the foreign-sourced 

chemicals butylated hydroxytoluene 

(HTSUS 2907.19.8000), hydroxylamine 

(HTSUS 2928.00.5000), and selamectin 

(HTSUS 2932.29.5050), two of which 

are processed at Pfizer’s Groton, 

Connecticut facility, prior to shipment 

to the Lee’s Summit facility. A subzone 

application is currently pending with 

the FTZ Board for Pfizer’s Groton 

facility (Docket 45–2004). Foreignsourced chemicals will account for most 

of the material value of the finished 

product. 

Zone procedures used at Lee’s 

Summit would exempt Pfizer from 

Customs duty payments on foreign 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 213 / Thursday, November 4, 2004 / Notices 64275

input when used in production for 

export (some 33 percent of production). 

Pfizer expects that export sales will 

grow to account for 50 percent of 

production in the near future. On 

domestic sales, Pfizer would be able to 

choose the lower duty rate (duty free) 

that applies to the finished product, 

rather than the duty rate on the foreignsourced chemicals listed above, which 

are dutiable at rates from 3.7 to 6.5 

percent. The request indicates that the 

savings from utilizing FTZ procedures 

would help improve the plant’s 

international competitiveness. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff 

has been designated examiner to 

investigate the application and report to 

the Board. 

Public comment on the application is 

invited from interested parties. 

Submissions (original and 3 copies) 

shall be addressed to the Board’s 

Executive Secretary at one of the 

following addresses: 

1. Submissions via Express/Package 

Delivery Services: Foreign-Trade Zones 

Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

Franklin Court Building—Suite 4100W, 

1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20005; or, 

2. Submissions via the U.S. Postal 

Service: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, FCB—

Suite 4100W, 1401 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

The closing period for their receipt is 

January 3, 2005. Rebuttal comments in 

response to material submitted during 

the foregoing period may be submitted 

during the subsequent 15-day period (to 

January 18, 2005). 

A copy of the application and 

accompanying exhibits will be available 

during this time for public inspection at 

the address Number 1 listed above, and 

at the U.S. Department of Commerce 

Export Assistance Center, 2345 Grand 

Boulevard, Suite 650, Kansas City, MO 

64108.

Dated: October 29, 2004. 

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 04–24654 Filed 11–3–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–805] 

Certain Pasta From Turkey: Extension 

of Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 4, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Young at (202) 482–6397, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to issue (1) the 

preliminary results of a review within 

245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order or 

finding for which a review is requested, 

and (2) the final results within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. However, if it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within that time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 

365 days and the final results to a 

maximum of 180 days (or 300 days if 

the Department does not extend the 

time limit for the preliminary results) 

from the date of the publication of the 

preliminary results. See also 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

Background 

On August 22, 2003, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain pasta 

from Turkey, covering the period July 1, 

2002, to June 30, 2003. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 68 FR 50750. On 

March 17, 2004, the Department fully 

extended the preliminary results of the 

aforementioned review by 120 days. See 

Certain Pasta from Italy and Turkey: 

Extension of Preliminary Results of 

2002/2003 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, 69 FR12641. 

On August 6, 2004, the Department 

published the preliminary results of its 

review. See Certain Pasta From Turkey: 

Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 69 FR 47876. The final results 

of this review are currently due no later 

than December 6, 2004. 

Extension of Final Results of Reviews 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the final results of this 

review within the original time limit 

because the Department needs 

additional time to fully consider parties’

arguments regarding the proposed 

modifications to the wheat codes and 

rejection of untimely submissions. 

Therefore, we are extending the 

deadline for the final results of the 

above-referenced review until February 

2, 2005. 

This extension is in accordance with 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2).

Dated: October 29, 2004. 

Jeffrey A. May, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration.

[FR Doc. E4–3010 Filed 11–3–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–818] 

Certain Pasta From Italy: Extension of 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: November 4, 

2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Young at (202) 482–6397, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to issue (1) the 

preliminary results of a review within 

245 days after the last day of the 

anniversary month of an order or 

finding for which a review is requested, 

and (2) the final results within 120 days 

after the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. However, if it is 

not practicable to complete the review 

within that time period, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary results to a maximum of 

365 days and the final results to a 

maximum of 180 days (or 300 days if 

the Department does not extend the