Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 54713 

funds transfer payments, and shall submit 

this designation to the Grant Officer or other 

Government official, as directed. 

(b) For payment through FEDLINE, the 

recipient shall provide the following 

information: 

(1) Name, address, and telegraphic 

abbreviation of the financial institution 

receiving payment. 

(2) The American Bankers Association 9- 

digit identifying number for wire transfers of 

the financing institution receiving payment if 

the institution has access to the Federal 

Reserve Communication System. 

(3) Payee’s account number at the financial 

institution where funds are to be transferred. 

(4) If the financial institution does not have 

access to the Federal Reserve 

Communications System, name, address, and 

telegraphic abbreviation of the correspondent 

financial institution through which the 

financial institution receiving payment 

obtains wire transfer activity. Provide the 

telegraphic abbreviation and American 

Bankers Association identifying number for 

the correspondent institution. 

(c) For payment through ACH, the 

recipient shall provide the following 

information: 

(1) Routing transit number of the financial 

institution receiving payment (same as 

American Bankers Association identifying 

number used for FEDLINE). 

(2) Number of account to which funds are 

to be deposited. 

(3) Type of depositor account (‘‘C’’ for 

checking, ‘‘S’’ for savings). 

(4) If the recipient is a new enrollee to the 

ACH system, a ‘‘Payment Information Form,’’ 

SF 3881, must be completed before payment 

can be processed. 

(d) In the event the recipient, during the 

performance of this award, elects to designate 

a different financial institution for the receipt 

of any payment made using electronic funds 

transfer procedures, notification of such 

change and the required information 

specified above must be received by the 

appropriate Government official 30 days 

prior to the date such change is to become 

effective. 

(e) The documents furnishing the 

information required in this term and 

condition must be dated and contain the 

signature, title, and telephone number of the 

recipient official authorized to provide it, as 

well as the recipient’s name and award 

number. 

(f) Failure to properly designate a financial 

institution or to provide appropriate payee 

bank account information may delay 

payments of amounts otherwise properly 

due. 

(g) The requirements set forth in this term 

and condition shall govern to the extent these 

requirements are inconsistent with the 

requirements in term and condition 

‘‘Financial Management’’. 

(End of Term and Condition) 

[FR Doc. 2015–21434 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Rural Housing Service 

7 CFR Part 3550 

RIN 0575–AC88 

Single Family Housing Direct Loan 

Program 

AGENCY: Rural Housing Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective 

date. 

SUMMARY: On April 29, 2015, the Rural 

Housing Service (RHS) published a final 

rule to create a certified loan application 

packaging process for the direct single 

family housing loan program. On June 5, 

2015, the final rule’s effective date was 

deferred to October 1, 2015. The final 

rule’s effective date is further delayed 

until October 1, 2016. 

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date 

of the final rule published April 29, 

2015 (80 FR 23673), effective July 28, 

2015, and delayed on June 5, 2015 (80 

FR 31971), is further delayed until 

October 1, 2016. RHS will publish in the 

Federal Register another document 

changing the effective date if and when 

appropriations mandates impacting 

Fiscal Year 2016 do not reference the 

packaging pilot program. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brooke Baumann, Branch Chief, Single 

Family Housing Direct Loan Division, 

USDA Rural Development, Stop 0783, 

1400 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20250–0783, 

Telephone: 202–690–4250. Email: 

brooke.baumann@wdc.usda.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

729 of the Consolidated and Further 

Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 

(Act) (Pub. L. 113–235) provides that the 

Agency will continue agreements with 

the current intermediaries in the pilot 

program and enter into additional 

agreements that increase the number of 

pilot intermediaries to at least 10. This 

appropriations mandate, which applies 

to the packaging pilot program in Fiscal 

Year 2015, prompted the Agency to 

defer the effective date of the final rule 

from July 28, 2015, to October 1, 2015, 

to allow the existing intermediaries 

under the pilot sufficient time to 

process loan application packages in 

their queue and to prepare for the 

implementation of the final rule. 

Since Section 729 will remain in 

effect during any continuing resolution 

passed to continue program operations 

in Fiscal Year 2016 and given that 

similar mandatory language regarding 

the packaging pilot program is currently 

found in the Fiscal Year 2016 

appropriations bills passed by the 

House and the Senate, the final rule to 

create a certified loan application 

packaging process will be deferred 

again. In an abundance of caution, the 

Agency takes this action to avoid the 

possibility of duplicative and 

inconsistent policies for this important 

certified loan application packaging 

process. 

In the interim, existing pilot 

intermediaries will be contacted directly 

concerning extensions of their 

agreements. In addition, applications 

received from potential intermediaries 

under the final rule, which were due by 

July 9, 2015, will now be considered for 

inclusion in any Fiscal Year 2016 

packaging pilot program. 

Dated: August 31, 2015. 

Tony Hernandez, 

Administrator, Rural Housing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22785 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 23 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–3678; Special 

Conditions No. 23–268–SC] 

Special Conditions: Korea Aerospace 

Industries, Ltd., Model K–100; Full 

Authority Digital Engine Control 

(FADEC) System 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the Korea Aerospace 

Industries, Ltd., Model K–100 airplane. 

This airplane will have a novel or 

unusual design feature(s) associated 

with the use of an electronic engine 

control system instead of a traditional 

mechanical control system. The 

applicable airworthiness regulations do 

not contain adequate or appropriate 

safety standards for this design feature. 

These special conditions contain the 

additional safety standards that the 

Administrator considers necessary to 

establish a level of safety equivalent to 

that established by the existing 

airworthiness standards. 

DATES: The effective date of these 

special conditions is September 11, 

2015. 

We must receive your comments by 

October 26, 2015. 


rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
54714 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified 

by docket number FAA–2015–3678 

using any of the following methods: 

b Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and follow 

the online instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

b Mail: Send comments to Docket 

Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 

20590–0001. 

b Hand Delivery of Courier: Take 

comments to Docket Operations in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

b Fax: Fax comments to Docket 

Operations at 202–493–2251. 

Privacy: The FAA will post all 

comments it receives, without change, 

to http://regulations.gov, including any 

personal information the commenter 

provides. Using the search function of 

the docket Web site, anyone can find 

and read the electronic form of all 

comments received into any FAA 

docket, including the name of the 

individual sending the comment (or 

signing the comment for an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement can be 

found in the Federal Register published 

on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478), 

as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov. 

Docket: Background documents or 

comments received may be read at 

http://www.regulations.gov at any time. 

Follow the online instructions for 

accessing the docket or go to the Docket 

Operations in Room W12–140 of the 

West Building Ground Floor at 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pretz, Federal Aviation Administration, 

Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, ACE–111, 901 

Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 

64106; telephone (816) 329–3239, 

facsimile (816) 329–4090. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

has determined, in accordance with 5 

U.S. Code §§ 553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3), 

that notice and opportunity for prior 

public comment hereon are unnecessary 

because the substance of this special 

condition has been subject to the public 

comment process in several prior 

instances with no substantive comments 

received. The FAA therefore finds that 

good cause exists for making these 

special conditions effective upon 

issuance. 

Special condition number Company/airplane model 

23–237–SC .. Spectrum Aeronautical Model 

S–40. 

23–246–SC .. Cirrus Design Corporation 

Model SF50. 

23–253–SC .. Diamond Aircraft industries 

Model DA–40NG. 

Comments Invited 

We invite interested people to take 

part in this rulemaking by sending 

written comments, data, or views. The 

most helpful comments reference a 

specific portion of the special 

conditions, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. We ask that you send 

us two copies of written comments. 

We will consider all comments we 

receive on or before the closing date for 

comments. We will consider comments 

filed late if it is possible to do so 

without incurring expense or delay. We 

may change these special conditions 

based on the comments we receive. 

Background 

On December 21, 2009, Korea 

Aerospace Industries, Ltd., applied for a 

type certificate for their new Model KC– 

100 airplane. The KC–100 is a normal 

category single engine four passenger 

composite low wing airplane with a 

maximum takeoff weight of 3600 

pounds. It has fixed tricycle landing 

gear and is designed for both Visual 

Flight Rules (VFR) and Instrument 

Flight Rules (IFR) operations. 

The KC–100 will use an electronic 

engine control system (FADEC) instead 

of a traditional mechanical control 

system. The engine control system will 

be certificated as part of the engine; 

however, the installation of an engine 

with an electronic control system 

requires evaluation due to critical 

environmental effects and possible 

effects on or by other airplane electronic 

systems, shared engine and airplane 

data and power sources. 

The regulatory requirements in 14 

CFR part 23 for evaluating the 

installation of complex systems, 

including electronic systems and critical 

environmental effects, are contained in 

§ 23.1309. When § 23.1309 was 

developed, the use of electronic control 

systems for engines was not envisioned. 

Therefore, § 23.1309 requirements were 

not applicable to systems certificated as 

part of the engine (reference 

§ 23.1309(f)(1)). Parts of the system that 

are not certificated with the engine 

could be evaluated using the criteria of 

§ 23.1309. However, the integral nature 

of these systems makes it unfeasible to 

evaluate the airplane portion of the 

system without including the engine 

portion of the system. In some cases, the 

airplane that the engine is used in will 

require a higher classification than the 

engine controls are certificated for; 

requiring the FADEC system to be 

analyzed at a higher classification. As of 

November 2005, FADEC special 

conditions mandated the classification 

for § 23.1309 analyses for loss of FADEC 

control as catastrophic for any airplane 

using a FADEC. This is not to imply an 

engine failure is classified as 

catastrophic, but that the digital engine 

control must provide an equivalent 

reliability to mechanical engine 

controls. 

Type Certification Basis 

Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, 

Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd., must 

show that the KC–100 meets the 

applicable provisions of part 23, as 

amended by amendment 23–1 through 

23–59, thereto. 

If the Administrator finds that the 

applicable airworthiness regulations 

(i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards 

for the KC–100 because of a novel or 

unusual design feature, special 

conditions are prescribed under the 

provisions of § 21.16. 

In addition to the applicable 

airworthiness regulations and special 

conditions, the KC–100 must comply 

with the fuel vent and exhaust emission 

requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the 

noise certification requirements of 14 

CFR part 36. The FAA must issue a 

finding of regulatory adequacy under 

§ 611 of Public Law 92–574, the Noise 

Control Act of 1972. 

The FAA issues special conditions, as 

defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and 

they become part of the type 

certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2). 

Special conditions are initially 

applicable to the model for which they 

are issued. Should the type certificate 

for that model be amended later to 

include any other model that 

incorporates the same novel or unusual 

design feature, the special conditions 

would also apply to the other model 

under the provisions of § 21.101(a)(1). 

Novel or Unusual Design Features 

The KC–100 will incorporate the 

following novel or unusual design 

features: an electronic engine control. 

Discussion 

The Model KC–100 makes use of an 

electronic engine control system instead 

of a traditional mechanical control 

system, which is considered a novel 

design for this type of airplane. The 

applicable airworthiness regulations do 


rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 176 / Friday, September 11, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 54715 

not contain adequate or appropriate 

safety standards for this design feature. 

Maintaining a structured assessment to 

determine potential installation issues 

mitigates the concern that the addition 

of a full authority engine controller does 

not produce a failure condition not 

previously considered. 

Applicability 

The special conditions are applicable 

to the KC–100. Should Korea Aerospace 

Industries, Ltd., apply at a later date for 

a change to the type certificate to 

include another model incorporating the 

same novel or unusual design feature, 

the special conditions would also apply 

to that model as well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on the KC– 

100. It is not a rule of general 

applicability and affects only the 

applicant who applied to the FAA for 

approval of these features on the 

airplane. 

The substance of these special 

conditions has been subjected to the 

notice and comment period in several 

prior instances and has been derived 

without substantive change from those 

previously issued. It is unlikely that 

prior public comment would result in a 

significant change from the substance 

contained herein. Therefore, notice and 

opportunity for prior public comment 

hereon are unnecessary and the FAA 

finds good cause, in accordance with 5 

U.S. Code §§ 553(b)(3)(B) and 553(d)(3), 

making these special conditions 

effective upon issuance. The FAA is 

requesting comments to allow interested 

persons to submit views that may not 

have been submitted in response to the 

prior opportunities for comment 

described above. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and 

symbols. 

Citation 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 

44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR 

11.38 and 11.19. 

The Special Conditions 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me by the 

Administrator, the following special 

conditions are issued as part of the type 

certification basis for Korea Aerospace 

Industries, Ltd., Model KC–100 

airplanes. 

1. Electronic Engine Control 

a. For electronic engine control 

system installations, it must be 

established that no single failure or 

malfunction or probable combinations 

of failures of Electronic Engine Control 

(EEC) system components will have an 

effect on the system, as installed in the 

airplane, that causes the Loss of Thrust 

Control (LOTC)/Loss of Power Control 

(LOPC) probability of the system to 

exceed those allowed in part 33 

certification. 

b. EEC system installations must be 

evaluated for environmental and 

atmospheric conditions, including 

lightning. The EEC system lightning and 

high intensity radiated frequency effects 

that result during an LOTC/LOPC 

should be considered catastrophic. 

c. The components of the installation 

must be constructed, arranged, and 

installed so as to ensure their continued 

safe operation between normal 

inspections or overhauls. 

d. Functions incorporated into any 

EEC that make it part of any equipment, 

system or installation having functions 

beyond that of basic engine control, and 

may also introduce system failures and 

malfunctions, are not exempt from 

§ 23.1309 and must be shown to meet 

part 23 levels of safety as derived from 

§ 23.1309. Part 33 certification data, if 

applicable, may be used to show 

compliance with any part 23 

requirements. If part 33 data is to be 

used to substantiate compliance with 

part 23 requirements, then the part 23 

applicant must be able to provide this 

data for their showing of compliance. 

Note: The term ‘‘probable’’ in the context 

of ‘‘probable combination of failures’’ does 

not have the same meaning as in AC 

23.13091D. The term ‘‘probable’’ in 

‘‘probable combination of failures’’ means 

‘‘foreseeable,’’ or not ‘‘extremely 

improbable,’’ as referenced in AC 23.1309– 

1D. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on August 

28, 2015. 

Earl Lawrence, 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22872 Filed 9–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

21 CFR Part 1308 

[Docket No. DEA–415F] 

Schedules of Controlled Substances: 

Removal of [123I]Ioflupane From 

Schedule II of the Controlled 

Substances Act 

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: With the issuance of this final 

rule, the Administrator of the Drug 

Enforcement Administration removes 

[123I]ioflupane from the schedules of the 

Controlled Substances Act. This action 

is pursuant to the Controlled Substances 

Act which requires that such actions be 

made on the record after an opportunity 

for a hearing through formal 

rulemaking. Prior to the effective date of 

this rule, [123I]ioflupane was, by 

definition, a schedule II controlled 

substance because it is derived from 

cocaine via ecgonine, both of which are 

schedule II controlled substances. This 

action removes the regulatory controls 

and administrative, civil, and criminal 

sanctions applicable to controlled 

substances, including those specific to 

schedule II controlled substances, on 

persons who handle (manufacture, 

distribute, reverse distribute, dispense, 

conduct research, import, export, or 

conduct chemical analysis) or propose 

to handle [123I]ioflupane. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 11, 

2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

R. Scherbenske, Office of Diversion 

Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 

Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 

22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Legal Authority 

The Drug Enforcement 

Administration (DEA) implements and 

enforces titles II and III of the 

Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention 

and Control Act of 1970, as amended. 21 

U.S.C. 801–971. Titles II and III are 

referred to as the ‘‘Controlled 

Substances Act’’ and the ‘‘Controlled 

Substances Import and Export Act,’’ 

respectively, and are collectively 

referred to as the ‘‘Controlled 

Substances Act’’ or the ‘‘CSA’’ for the 

purpose of this action. The DEA 

publishes the implementing regulations 

for these statutes in title 21 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter II. 


rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES