alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-109 September 13, 2006

NRC BARS RESEARCH REACTOR OPERATOR FROM NRC-REGULATED WORK

DUE TO UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION TO REACTOR CONTROLS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued an order to a former senior reactor

operator at Reed College in Portland, Ore., prohibiting him from working in any NRC-regulated

activities for three years after the operator deliberately modified the school’s research reactor’s control

rod drive circuit without authorization.

The NRC’s Office of Investigations determined that on May 10, 2005, Nicholas A. Chaimov

deliberately removed a jumper on the control rod drive circuit of the Reed College Reactor. Without

the jumper, reactor operators would be unable to remove control rods to allow the reactor to start.

There was no threat to public health and safety, and the problem was discovered during a routine prestartup check. 

The NRC’s Order, which is effective immediately, requires Chaimov to cease any involvement

in NRC-licensed activities. His deliberate actions raise serious doubts as to whether he could be relied

upon to comply with NRC requirements. Consequently, the NRC staff determined an Order prohibiting

Chaimov’s involvement in NRC-licensed activities for a period of three years is appropriate.

Chaimov has 20 days to respond to the Order in writing, and he may request a hearing.

###
§ 185.135 The record. ( a ) The hearing shall be recorded and transcribed. Transcripts may be obtained following the hearing from the ALJ at a cost not to exceed the actual cost of duplication.
( b ) The transcript of testimony, exhibits and other evidence admitted at the hearing, and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for the decision by the ALJ and the authority head.
( c ) The record may be inspected and copied (upon payment of a reasonable fee) by anyone, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ pursuant to § 185.125.
### §718. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section, act Feb. 26, 1907, ch. 1638, §6, 34 Stat. 997, related to traveling expenses of Army and Navy officers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Waterworks, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 24, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mechelle Slaughter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Mechelle SlaughterMechelle SlaughterChief Financial OfficerOctober 29, 2004
 A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
National Waterworks, Inc. and will be retained by National Waterworks, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request. 22
§ 294.111 Custody of records; subpoenas. ( a ) The Chief, Plans and Policies Division, Administration Group, OPM, has official custody of OPM records. A subpoena or other judicial order for an official record from OPM should be served on the— Chief, Plans and Policies Division, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415
( b ) See 5 CFR part 297, subpart D—Disclosure of Records, of this title, for the steps other officials should take on receipt of a subpoena or other judicial order for an Office record.
[54 FR 25094, June 13, 1989, as amended at 57 FR 32150, July 21, 1992]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KELVIN LAVELLE RICHARDSON
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3193

[ June 11, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Glenn D. Kelley , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 2017CF002393AWB, 2017CF005012AMB and 2017CF010614AMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Logan Mohs, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §707. Sumner Dam and Lake Sumner; declaration of purpose; report to Congress; appropriation

The Sumner Dam and Lake Sumner on the Pecos River, New Mexico, is authorized and declared to be for the purposes of controlling floods, regulating the flow of the Pecos River, providing for storage and for delivery of stored waters, for the reclamation of lands, and other beneficial uses, and said dam and reservoir shall be used, first, for irrigation; second, for flood control and river regulation; and third, for other purposes. The Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army are directed to report to the Congress the amount of the total cost of said Sumner Dam and Lake Sumner which is properly allocable to flood control. The appropriation and transfer of such amount from the general fund of the Treasury to the reclamation fund, for credit by reduction of the maximum obligation of the Carlsbad Irrigation District to repay the total cost thereof, is authorized.

(Aug. 11, 1939, ch. 699, §7, 53 Stat. 1417; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 93–447, Oct. 17, 1974, 88 Stat. 1363.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1974—Pub. L. 93–447 substituted "Sumner Dam and Lake Sumner" for "Alamogordo Dam and Reservoir" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Alamogordo Dam and Reservoir Redesignated as Sumner Dam and Lake Sumner

Pub. L. 93–447, Oct. 17, 1974, 88 Stat. 1363, provided: "That the Alamogordo Dam and Reservoir, New Mexico, referred to in the Act of August 11, 1939 (53 Stat. 1414) [which enacted this section], are redesignated as Sumner Dam and Lake Sumner, respectively. Any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States in which such dam or reservoir is referred to shall be held to refer to such dam as Sumner Dam or such reservoir as Lake Sumner."
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-041 October 26, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SCHEDULES REGULATORY CONFERENCE

TO DISCUSS TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR PLANT CONCERN

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has scheduled a regulatory conference with officials

of Florida Power & Light Company on Nov. 8 in Atlanta to discuss the risk significance of inspection

findings at the company’s Turkey Point nuclear power plant, located near Homestead, Fla, about 30

miles south of Miami.

NRC and FP&L officials will discuss the significance of NRC inspection findings related to

unprotected post-fire safe shutdown cables and related compensatory, non-feasible local manual

operator action. The meeting was requested by FP&L. 

The NRC evaluates regulatory performance at commercial nuclear power plants with a colorcoded system which classifies findings as either green, white, yellow or red, in increasing order of

safety significance. The NRC’s preliminary evaluation determined that this issue at Turkey Point

appears to be a “white” finding, which would be considered to be of low to moderate safety

significance.

The meeting is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. in the NRC’s Region II office, located on the 24th floor

of the Atlanta Federal Center at 61 Forsyth Street SW in Atlanta. The public is invited to attend to

observe and will have one or more opportunities to communicate with the NRC after the business

portion, but before the meeting is adjourned.

No decisions on the final safety significance, apparent violations or possible enforcement action

will be made during the conference. Those decisions will be made by NRC officials at a later time.

### 

AUDIO TELECONFERENCE: Interested members of the public can participate in this meeting via

a toll-free audio teleconference. Please contact Mr. Charles Payne at (404) 562-4669 by Nov. 4

indicating your intent and to obtain a teleconferencing number.
§ 302.603 Appeals. ( a ) A competitive service employee whose position is placed into the excepted service or who is otherwise moved involuntarily to the excepted service, or an excepted service employee whose position is placed into a different schedule of the excepted service or who is otherwise involuntarily moved to a position in a different schedule of the excepted service, may directly appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section. The appeal rights conferred in this section are in addition to, and not in derogation of, any right the individual would otherwise have to appeal a subsequent personnel action undertaken without following appropriate procedures under chapter 75, subchapter II, or section 4303 of title 5, United States Code.
( b ) Where the agency, notwithstanding the requirements of section 302.602 of this part, asserts that the move of the original position or any subsequent position to which the individual is involuntarily moved thereafter will eliminate competitive status or any procedural and appeal rights that had previously accrued, the affected individual may appeal from that determination and request an order directing the agency: ( 1 ) To correct the notice to provide that any previously accrued status or procedural and appeal rights under those provisions continue to apply; and
( 2 ) To comply with the requirements of either chapter 75, subchapter II or section 4303, title 5, United States Code, in pursuing any action available under those provisions, except to the extent that any such order would be inconsistent with an applicable statute.
( c ) Where the agency fails to comply with § 302.602(c)(1) of this part and fails to provide the individual with the requisite notice, the affected individual may appeal the failure to provide the requisite notice and request an order directing the agency to comply with that provision.
( d ) An individual may appeal under this part on the basis that: ( 1 ) A facially voluntary move was coerced or otherwise involuntary; or
( 2 ) A facially voluntary move to a new position would require the individual to relinquish their competitive status or any civil service protections and the move was coerced or otherwise involuntary.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00095-CV

Celestino MACIAS,

Appellant

v.

Remedios BAUTISTA,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI07970

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2020

VACATED AND REMANDED

Appellant Celestino Macias and appellee Remedios Bautista filed a joint motion to dismiss 

the appeal by agreement. We grant the motion. In accordance with the motion, we set aside the 

trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court with 

instructions to vacate the trial court’s November 14, 2019 Default Final Decree of Divorce. See 

1 The Honorable Cathleen Stryker is the presiding judge of the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas. 

However, the Honorable Aaron Hass, sitting by assignment, signed the order that is the subject of this appeal.
04-20-00095-CV

- 2 -

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

2

 Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them. 

See id. R. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

2 The parties also request that this court dismiss this appeal; however, the appeal is disposed of by this court’s opinion 

and judgment vacating the trial court’s judgment and remanding the cause to the trial court. See Priority Towing, Inc. 

v. State, No. 04-16-00359-CV, 2017 WL 361755, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 25, 2017, no pet.) (per curiam) 

(mem. op.).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer of Cymer,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’sannual report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, to which thiscertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

**In Witness Whereof**,the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 3rd day of May, 2006.

 

 
| /s/Robert P. Akins                       |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, isnot deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of USA Technologies, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, George R. Jensen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ George R. Jensen, Jr.George R. Jensen, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 18, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00838-CV

RICHARD MCKINNEY, Appellant

V.

DEL-JEN, INC., NORTH TEXAS JOB CORPS CENTER,

MARIA T. MARTIN, AND LANA KITE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04888

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Brown

Before the Court is appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellees contend the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not file a response to 

appellees’ motion.

In a letter dated July 3, 2013, the Court informed appellant that his brief was deficient 

and instructed him to file an amended brief correcting the deficiencies within thirty days. The 

Court cautioned appellant that failure to file an amended brief within the time requested may 

result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not 

filed an amended brief. Appellant did not file a response to the motion to dismiss. 
–2–

Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b).

130838F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RICHARD MCKINNEY, Appellant

No. 05-13-00838-CV V.

DEL-JEN, INC., NORTH TEXAS JOB 

CORPS CENTER, MARIA T. MARTIN, 

AND LANA KITE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04888.

Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. 

Justices Bridges and O’Neill, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellees, DEL-JEN, INC., NORTH TEXAS JOB CORPS 

CENTER, MARIA T. MARTIN, AND LANA KITE, recover their costs of this appeal from 

appellant, RICHARD MCKINNEY.

Judgment entered this 18th day of February, 2014.

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ISMAEL ALDANA, a/k/a Luis Ismail Garcia,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, 

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00167-MR-1)

Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 26, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ismael Aldana, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ismael Aldana appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Aldana, No. 1:06-cr00167-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Kevin James Harrison

, * From the 2 2 0 th District Court

of Comanche County

Trial Court No. CR04249

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 072

- CR * October 1 8 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is i n all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          25,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,185,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          40,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,261,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,134,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           395
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,369
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,261,206
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,283
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,682)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,682)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.16)


</TABLE>