alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-057 April 19, 2006

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET MAY 4-5 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

will hold a public meeting May 4-5 in Rockville, Md., to conduct a final review of the license renewal

application for the Brunswick nuclear power plant, near Southport, N.C. Among other items, the

committee will also conduct final reviews of extended power uprate applications for the Ginna nuclear

power plant, near Rochester, N.Y., and the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant in western Pennsylvania.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and end at 7 p.m. on Thursday and 7:30 p.m.

on Friday. A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2006/ . Anyone with questions or those

wanting to make public statements during the meeting should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-

7364. To pursue videoconferencing services, contact Theron Brown, at 301-415-8066.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operating of nuclear power plants and

related safety issues.

###
BARRY L. FRIEDMAN, P.C.
                        Certified Public Accountant


1582 TULITA DRIVE                           OFFICE (702) 361-8414
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89123                    FAX NO. (702) 896-0278


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


To Whom It May Concern:
                                                          January 2, 2001

     The  firm  of  Barry  L. Friedman, P.C., Certified  Public  Accountant
consents  to  the inclusion of their report of  January 2,  2001,  on  the
Financial Statements of Take A Ride, Inc., as of December 31, 2000,
In any filings  that are  necessary  now  or  in the near future with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Very truly yours,

/s/ Barry L. Friedman

Barry L. Friedman
Certified Public Accountant
§ 1201.31 Representatives. ( a ) *Procedure.* A party to an appeal may be represented in any matter related to the appeal. Parties may designate a representative, revoke such a designation, and change such a designation in a signed submission, submitted as a pleading.
( b ) A party may choose any representative as long as that person is willing and available to serve. The other party or parties may challenge the designation, however, on the ground that it involves a conflict of interest or a conflict of position. Any party who challenges the designation must do so by filing a motion with the judge within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of designation or 15 days after a party becomes aware of the conflict. The judge will rule on the motion before considering the merits of the appeal. These procedures apply equally to each designation of representative, regardless of whether the representative was the first one designated by a party or a subsequently designated representative. If a representative is disqualified, the judge will give the party whose representative was disqualified a reasonable time to obtain another one.
( c ) The judge, on his or her own motion, may disqualify a party's representative on the grounds described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) As set forth in paragraphs (d) and (e) of § 1201.43 of this part, a judge may exclude a representative from all or any portion of the proceeding before him or her for contumacious conduct or conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 62 FR 62689, Nov. 25, 1997; 62 FR 66815, Dec. 22, 1997; 63 FR 35500, June 30, 1998; 65 FR 5409, Feb. 4, 2000; 68 FR 59862, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57630, Sept. 27, 2004; 77 FR 62365, Oct. 12, 2012]
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-002 March 20, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE

FOR BAYOU INSPECTION SERVICES, INC.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a fine of $6,000 against

Bayou Inspection Services, Inc., of Amelia, La., for violating NRC requirements.

In a letter to the company, Bruce S. Mallett, Administrator of the NRC’s Region IV office

in Arlington, Texas, said that as a result of an NRC inspection, the agency determined that the

company violated NRC requirements for the possession and use of radioactive materials.

The violations involved the company’s failure on two occasions to secure or maintain

constant surveillance of radioactive materials used in radiographic exposure devices in

unrestricted areas. 

Radiography is a non-destructive testing method which uses sealed radiation sources to

make x-ray like images of heavy metal objects like pumps, valves and pipes.

“NRC regulations require that users of radioactive materials maintain appropriate security

of them at all times in order to protect public health and safety,” said NRC Region IV

Administrator Bruce Mallett. 

NRC staff discussed the apparent violations, their significance, the root cause and the

company’s corrective actions during an enforcement conference with company officials on

October 25, 2005. The company has taken steps to prevent recurrence.

The NRC has classified one of the violations at Severity Level III, which carries a $6,000

civil penalty. The agency has a four-level severity scale in which Severity level I is the most

serious. The company has 30 days to either pay the fine or challenge it. The company can

request alternative dispute resolution in an attempt to resolve the issue.
The NRC’s letter, its enclosures, and the company’s response will be made available to

interested members of the public through the agency’s public electronic reading room at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in accessing these documents is available

from the NRC Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209.

###
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

NEW KENSINGTON

- ARNOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Petitioner

v.

NEW KENSINGTON

- ARNOLD

EDUCATION

- ASSOCIATION, PSEA/NEA,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 320 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6255** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. SAMUEL SOLOMON TAYLOR , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the South ern District of West Virginia , at Charleston
. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. ( 2:08

- cr - 00222

- 1; 2:09

- cv - 00826 )

Submitted : August 19, 2010 Decided: September 10 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un pub lished per curiam opinion
. Samuel Solomon Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Monica Lynn Dillon, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Samuel S olomon Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a cer tificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitution al right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Taylor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1822

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3751 West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Dosan Ahn 

Chang Ho Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2003

Ms. WATSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3751 West 6th Street in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Dosan Ahn Chang Ho Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DOSAN AHN CHANG HO POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3751 West 6th Street in Los An6 geles, California, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Dosan Ahn Chang Ho Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

•HR 1822 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Dosan Ahn Chang Ho 

3 Post Office.

Æ
Board Meeting Comments Log http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm/bccommlog.php?listname=sjv08

1 of 2 7/7/2008 3:34 PM 

### Send Us Your Board Item Comments 

### B ELOW IS THE 

### C OMMENT

### L OG FOR 

### SJV 2008 PM2.5 I MPLEMENTATION 

### P LAN 

### ( SJV 

### 08).

# Received From Subject Comment Period Date/Time Added to Database Additional Form Letters 1 Shipp, Evan, Comments on the SJVAPCD PM2.5 Plan Non-Reg 2008-05-14 21:57:22 2 Bautista, Nidia, Coalition for Clean Air Comments on SJV PM 2.5 Plan Non-Reg 2008-05-21 11:54:09 3 Bautista, Nidia, Coalition for Clean Air Additional Items on SJV PM 2.5 Plan Non-Reg 2008-05-21 11:58:05 Comments posted to sjv08 that were presented during the Board Hearing:

# Received From Subject Comment Period Date/Time Added to Database Additional Form Letters 1 Thompson, Kim , Central Valley Air Quality (CVAQ) SIP Committee Non-Reg 2008-05-27 14:45:56 2 Yuhnke, Robert E., SCAB Non-Reg 2008-05-27 14:55:14 3 Newell, Brent, United States Environmental Protection Agency Non-Reg 2008-05-27 15:05:53 4 Jackson, Sarah, Research Associate, Earth Justice Non-Reg 2008-05-27 15:10:33 5 Davis, Nicole, ISSRC Non-Reg 2008-05-27 15:12:48 6 Quan, Jim, Advanced Energy Non-Reg 2008-05-27 15:17:50 7 Rawling, Mary - Michal, Golden Valley Health Center Non-Reg 2008-05-27 15:26:00 8 Valeriano, Alvin, ISSRC & CVAQ Non-Reg 2008-05-27 15:31:27 9 McEdward, Jodi M., PM 2.5 Plan Commentary Non-Reg 2008-06-09 15:39:36 We expect that any written comments received during the Board Hearing will be posted within one week of the Board Hearing. Compilation of all printable comments for sjv08 If you have any questions or comments please contact COTB at (916) 322-5594. 

### Board Meeting Comment Logs Send Us Your Board Item Comments



### B OARD

### M EETING 

### C OMMENTS

### L OGBoard Meeting Comments Log http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm/bccommlog.php?listname=sjv08

2 of 2 7/7/2008 3:34 PM The Board is one of six boards, departments, and offices under the umbrella of the California Environmental Protection Agency.

Cal/EPA | ARB| CIWMB | DPR | DTSC | OEHHA | SWRCB
§ 2638.309 Agency-specific ethics education requirements. The DAEO may establish additional requirements for the agency's ethics education program, with or without a supplemental agency regulation under § 2635.105 of this chapter. ( a ) *Groups of employees.* The DAEO may establish specific government ethics training requirements for groups of agency employees.
( b ) *Employees performing ethics duties.* The DAEO has an obligation to ensure that employees performing assigned ethics duties have the necessary expertise with regard to government ethics laws and regulations. If the DAEO determines that employees engaged in any activities described in §§ 2638.104 and 2638.105 require training, the DAEO may establish specific training requirements for them either as a group or individually.
( c ) *Procedures.* The DAEO may establish specific procedures for training that the DAEO requires under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, including any certification procedures the DAEO deems necessary. Agency employees must comply with the requirements and procedures that the DAEO establishes under this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-113 August 19, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET SEPT. 8-10 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting Sept. 8-10 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the license renewal

application for the Millstone Power Station, Unit 2 and 3, in Connecticut. The committee will also be

briefed by NRC staff and Exelon Generation Company officials regarding an early site permit

application and draft Safety Evaluation Report for the possible construction of a nuclear power reactor

on the site of the existing Clinton nuclear power plant, about six miles east of Clinton, Ill.

The meeting, to be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike, will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day. The meeting will end at 7 p.m. on Thursday

and Friday, and at 3:30 p.m. on Saturday. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2005/ . Anyone with questions or those

wanting to make public statements during the meeting should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-

7364.

###
#### § 534.605 Conversion.

On the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after December 11, 2001, agencies must convert the rate of basic pay of an administrative appeals judge to the lowest rate of basic pay provided by § 534.603(a) of this subpart that equals or exceeds the rate of basic pay the administrative appeals judge received immediately before that date.
### §863. Repealed. June 21, 1955, ch. 172, §5(4), 69 Stat. 170

Section, acts Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 299, §1, 35 Stat. 974; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to leaves of absence of officers of the Coast and Geodetic Survey on duty in the Philippine Islands.
### §3401. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to establish the national ocean exploration program within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12001, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1417; Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIII, §10305(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3971.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 struck out "and the national undersea research program" after "national ocean exploration program".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12101, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1419, which provided that part II of subtitle A of title XII of Pub. L. 111–11, which enacted subchapter II of this chapter, could be cited as the "NOAA Undersea Research Program Act of 2009", was repealed by Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIII, §10306(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3974.
#### Madeline Graf, Respondent, v. Oscar L. Graf, Appellant.

No opinion. The parties should proceed to trial without any further delay. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-07-026 July 6, 2007

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2006 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT 

FOR SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet in San Clemente, Calif., on July 12, 

with representatives of Southern California Edison Co. to discuss the agency’s assessment of

safety performance for last year at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.

The meeting, which will be open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. at the

Country Plaza Inn, Conference Room, 35 Via Pico Plaza, San Clemente.

In addition to the performance assessment, the NRC staff will be available to answer

questions from the public on the safety performance of San Onofre, as well as the NRC’s role in

ensuring safe plant operation.

 “The NRC continually reviews the performance of San Onofre and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett said. This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety

performance with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2006 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/sano_2006q4.pdf.

The NRC utilizes color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess

nuclear power plant performance. The colors start with "green" and then increase to "white,"

"yellow" or "red," commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

The NRC said San Onofre operated safely during 2006 and will receive routine, or

baseline inspections during 2007.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas.
Current performance information for San Onofre Unit Two is available on the NRC web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SANO2/sano2_chart.html.

 Current performance information for San Onofre Unit 3 is available at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SANO3/sano3_chart.html.

###

NRC news releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE

link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
§ 293.108 Rules of conduct. ( a ) *Scope.* These rules of conduct apply to all Office and agency employees responsible for creation, development, maintenance, processing, use, dissemination, and safeguarding of personnel records. The Office and agencies shall require that such employees are familiar with these and appropriate supplemental agency internal regulations.
( b ) *Standards of conduct.* Office and agency employees whose official duties involve personnel records shall be sensitive to individual rights to personal privacy and shall not disclose information from any personnel record unless disclosure is part of their official duties or required by executive order, regulation, or statute (e.g., required by the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552).
( c ) *Improper uses of personnel information.* Any Office or agency employee who makes a disclosure of personnel records knowing that such disclosure is unauthorized, or otherwise knowingly violates these regulations, shall be subject to disciplinary action and may also be subject to criminal penalties where the records are subject to the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). Employees are prohibited from using personnel information not available to the public, gained through official duties, for commercial solicitation or sale, or for personal gain.
### §2733. Bligh Reef light

The Secretary of Transportation shall within one year after August 18, 1990, install and ensure operation of an automated navigation light on or adjacent to Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound, Alaska, of sufficient power and height to provide long-range warning of the location of Bligh Reef.

(Pub. L. 101–380, title V, §5003, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 553.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-05-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,249
<INVENTORY>                                    108,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               237,178
<PP&E>                                         499,179
<DEPRECIATION>                                 188,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 629,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   629,168
<SALES>                                        192,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,363
<CGS>                                          169,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   819
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,082
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,082
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
§ 534.202 Coverage. In addition to the student-employees specified in 5 U.S.C. 5351(2)(A), the following student-employees are covered under this program, provided they are assigned or attached principally for training purposes to a hospital, clinic, or medical or dental laboratory operated by an agency: ( 1 ) Any student-employee whom an agency finds is properly covered under this program, provided that the student-employee is a registered student at an accredited academic institution and that the assignment or attachment for training purposes to the hospital, clinic, or medical or dental laboratory is a part of a medical or dental training program accredited by an appropriate accrediting body;
( 2 ) Any student-employee whom an agency finds is properly covered under this program, provided that the student-employee, during the period of assignment or attachment to the hospital, clinic, or medical or dental laboratory, will receive experience or training that is required to obtain a certificate or license in a medical or dental field; or
( 3 ) Any student-employee not otherwise covered under this program whom the Office of Personnel Management approves for coverage as a student-employee under this program.
[44 FR 54693, Sept. 21, 1979, as amended at 64 FR 68931, Dec. 9, 1999]