alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016211EN.01008801.xml

| 4.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 211/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 211/88

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE

No 127/2015

of 30 April 2015

amending Annex XXI (Statistics) to the EEA Agreement [2016/1310]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2014 of 26 November 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 408/2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics on pesticides, as regards transmission format (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2014 of 26 November 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 408/2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1185/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning statistics on pesticides, as regards transmission format (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 24da (Commission Regulation (EU) No 408/2011) of Annex XXI to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32014 R 1264: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2014 of 26 November 2014 (OJ L 341, 27.11.2014, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32014 R 1264: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2014 of 26 November 2014 (OJ L 341, 27.11.2014, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2014 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 May 2015, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 April 2015.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Gianluca GRIPPA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 27.11.2014, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 207.8 Questionnaires to have the force of subpoenas; subpoena enforcement. Any questionnaire issued by the Commission in connection with any investigation under title VII of the Act may be issued as a subpoena and subscribed by a Commissioner, after which it shall have the force and effect of a subpoena authorized by the Commission. Whenever any party or any other person fails to respond adequately to such a subpoena or whenever a party or any other person refuses or is unable to produce information requested in a timely manner and in the form required, or otherwise significantly impedes an investigation, the Commission may: ( a ) Use the facts otherwise available in making its determination;
( b ) Seek judicial enforcement of the subpoena pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1333;
( c ) Make inferences adverse to such person's position, if such person is an interested party that has failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to comply with a request for information; and
( d ) Take such other actions as necessary to obtain needed information.
[61 FR 37831, July 22, 1996]
#### § 2423.32 Burden of proof before the Administrative Law Judge.

The General Counsel shall present the evidence in support of the complaint and have the burden of proving the allegations of the complaint by a preponderance of the evidence. The Respondent shall have the burden of proving any affirmative defenses that it raises to the allegations in the complaint.
#### In the Matter of Betty Huberman, as Executrix of Edward Huberman, Deceased, Appellant, against John F. O’Connell et al., Constituting the State Liquor Authority, et al., Respondents.

Appeal dismissed (see *Matter of Huberman*V. *O’Connell, ante,*p. 762, decided herewith). Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Beldoek, JJ.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



|In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clixster Mobile Group Inc a Texas corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months period ending June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Clixster Mobile Group Inc, and will be retained by Clixster Mobile Group Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali
|---------------------------
|-------------------------- 
|Mohd Suhaimi bin Rozali    
|Chief Financial Officer    
|June 23, 2014
### §621. By what methods river and harbor work may be authorized to be prosecuted

Any public work on canals, rivers, and harbors adopted by Congress may be prosecuted by direct appropriations, by continuing contracts, or by both direct appropriations and continuing contracts.

(Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 427, §10, 42 Stat. 1043.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1922.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1056 TP 14-01400**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT HAIGLER, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

SUPERINTENDENT SHEAHAN, FIVE POINTS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT.

ROBERT HAIGLER, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F. Bender, A.J.], entered August 6, 2014) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Free v Coombe , 234 AD2d 996).

Entered: October 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# L_2016355EN.01000101.xml

| 24.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 355/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 355/1

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People's Republic of China pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union

The Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the People's Republic of China pursuant to Article XXIV:6 and Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions in the schedule of the Republic of Croatia in the course of its accession to the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 19 April 2016, will enter into force on 1 January 2017.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 291, 26.10.2016, p. 9.

1

---
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards

Document

Number: 

# 58 ) VI-B- 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:37

PM Sheet 58of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 Vl-B- 9 Thi s documen t

ha s been move dt o IV-E-2 7 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t officer . I t wa s incorrectl y categoriz e originally .
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1728 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1728

 To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure equal treatment for 
  members of reserve components who perform inactive-duty training in 
determining their entitlement for aviation incentive pay and hazardous 
                               duty pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2003

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure equal treatment for 
  members of reserve components who perform inactive-duty training in 
determining their entitlement for aviation incentive pay and hazardous 
                               duty pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EQUAL TREATMENT OF RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBERS PERFORMING 
              INACTIVE-DUTY TRAINING FOR RECEIPT OF AVIATION CAREER 
              INCENTIVE PAY AND HAZARDOUS DUTY PAY.

    (a) Hazardous Duty Incentive Pay.--Section 301 of title 37, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting after ``basic pay'' in 
        the first sentence the following: ``under section 204 of this 
        title or compensation under section 206 of this title''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (f).
    (b) Officer Aviation Career Incentive Pay.--Section 301a of such 
title is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting after ``basic pay'' 
        the following: ``under section 204 of this title or 
        compensation under section 206 of this title'';
            (2) by striking subsection (d); and
            (3) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (d).
    (c) Career Enlisted Flyers Incentive Pay.--Section 320 of such 
title is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``, or is entitled to 
        pay under section 206 of this title as described in subsection 
        (e) of this section'' and inserting ``or compensation under 
        section 206 of this title'';
            (2) by striking subsection (e); and
            (3) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), and (i) as 
        subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h), respectively.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2003, and apply to duty described in sections 301, 
301a, and 320 of such title performed on or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
### §10237. Limitation on civil justice matters

Authority of any entity established under this chapter shall extend to civil justice matters only to the extent that such civil justice matters bear directly and substantially upon criminal justice matters or are inextricably intertwined with criminal justice matters.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §818, formerly §825, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1214; renumbered §818, Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609B(f), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3789n of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 818 of Pub. L. 90–351 was renumbered section 812 and is classified to section 10231 of this title.
§ 297.301 General provisions. ( a ) Individuals may request, in writing, the amendment of their records maintained in an Office system of records by contacting the appropriate system manager. The Office or agency will require proof of identity from a requester. The Office or agency reserves the right to determine the adequacy of any such proof. The general identifying items the Office will require a requester to provide when a request is made to the Office are— ( 1 ) Full name, signature, and home address;
( 2 ) Social security number (for systems of records that include this identifier);
( 3 ) Current or last place and dates of Federal employment, when appropriate; and
( 4 ) Date and place of birth.
( b ) An individual may be represented by another party when requesting amendment of records.
( c ) A request for amendment should include the following: ( 1 ) The precise identification of the records to be amended;
( 2 ) The identification of the specific material to be deleted, added, or changed; and
( 3 ) A statement of the reasons for the request, including all available material substantiating the request.
( d ) Requests for amendment of records should include the words “PRIVACY ACT AMENDMENT REQUEST” in capital letters on both the envelope and at the top of the request letter.
( e ) A request for administrative review of an agency denial to amend a record in the Office's systems of records should be addressed to the Assistant Director for Workforce Information, Personnel Systems and Oversight Group, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415.
( f ) A request for administrative review of a denial to amend a record by an Office official should be addressed to the Information and Privacy Appeals Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20415.
( g ) The burden of proof demonstrating the appropriateness of the requested amendment rests with the requester; and, the requester must provide relevant and convincing evidence in support of the request.
§ 207.67 Posthearing briefs and statements. ( a ) *Briefs from parties.* Any party to a five-year review may file with the Secretary a posthearing brief concerning the information adduced at or after the hearing within a time specified in the scheduling notice or by the presiding official at the hearing. A posthearing brief shall be filed electronically, and nine (9) true paper copies shall be submitted on the same business day. No such posthearing brief shall exceed fifteen (15) pages of textual material, double spaced and single sided, when printed out on paper measuring 8.5 × 11 inches and single-sided. In addition, the presiding official may permit persons to file answers to questions or requests made by the Commission at the hearing within a specified time. The Secretary shall not accept for filing posthearing briefs or answers which do not comply with this section.
( b ) *Statements from nonparties.* Any person other than a party may submit a brief written statement of information pertinent to the review within the time specified for the filing of posthearing briefs.
[63 FR 30608, June 5, 1998, as amended at 76 FR 61944, Oct. 6, 2011; 79 FR 35926, June 25, 2014]
### §10691. Sex offender apprehension grants

#### (a) Authority to make sex offender apprehension grants

#### (1) In general

From amounts made available to carry out this subchapter, the Attorney General may make grants to States, units of local government, Indian tribal governments, other public and private entities, and multi-jurisdictional or regional consortia thereof for activities specified in paragraph (2).

#### (2) Covered activities

An activity referred to in paragraph (1) is any program, project, or other activity to assist a State in enforcing sex offender registration requirements.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2007 through 2009 to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §3011, as added Pub. L. 109–248, title VI, §623, July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 635.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 3797ee of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
§ 362.406 Movement between agencies. ( a ) At any time during his or her appointment in the Program, a Fellow may move to another agency covered by this part, as long as the agency meets all the requirements for participating in the PMF Program. To move from one agency to another during the Program, the Fellow must separate from the current agency. The new employing agency must appoint the Participant without a break in service.
( b ) The Fellow does not begin a new Program period upon appointment by the new employing agency. Because there is no break in service, time served under the previous Program appointment will apply towards the completion of the Program with the new employing agency.
( c ) An agency must notify OPM when appointing a Fellow currently appointed in another agency.
( d ) If the move occurs within the first 6 months of the Fellow's appointment, the original appointing agency may request reimbursement of one-quarter of the placement fee from the new appointing agency.
§ 595.103 What requirements must agencies establish for determining which physician positions are covered? ( a ) The head of each agency must determine categories of physician positions for which there is a significant recruitment and retention problem, and physicians' comparability allowances may be paid only to physicians serving in positions in such categories.
( b ) In determining categories of physician positions, the head of each agency must, as a minimum, establish as separate categories the following types of positions: ( 1 ) Positions primarily involving the practice of medicine or direct service to patients, involving the performance of diagnostic, preventive, or therapeutic services to patients in hospitals, clinics, public health programs, diagnostic centers, and similar settings, but not including positions described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section;
( 2 ) Positions primarily involving the conduct of medical research and experimental work, including the conduct of medical work pertaining to food, drugs, cosmetics, and devices (or the review or evaluation of such medical research and experimental work), or the identification of causes or sources of disease or disease outbreaks;
( 3 ) Positions primarily involving the evaluation of physical fitness, or the provision of initial treatment of on-the-job illness or injury, or the performance of preemployment examinations, preventive health screenings, or fitness-for-duty examinations; and
( 4 ) Positions not described by paragraph (b) (1), (2), or (3) of this section, including positions involving disability evaluation and rating, the performance of medicolegal autopsies, training activities, or the administration of medical and health programs, including the administration of patient care or medical research and experimental programs.
( c ) The agency head may establish as separate categories any additional subdivisions of these four categories of positions, based on any factors the agency head determines relevant. These may include such factors as the location, grade or level, and medical specialization of the positions, and the level of qualifications sought by the agency for physicians in the category.
[44 FR 40876, July 13, 1979, as amended at 69 FR 27817, May 17, 2004]
#### Max Zeitz, Appellant, v. Jacob J. Wechsler, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Glennon, J., dissents and votes to reverse and order a new trial upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence.
§ 6801.109 Prior approval for compensated outside employment. ( a ) *Approval requirement.* An employee shall obtain prior written approval from his or her Division director (or the Division director's designee) and the concurrence of the Board's Designated Agency Ethics Official before engaging in compensated outside employment.
( b ) *Standard for approval.* Approval will be granted unless a determination is made that the prospective outside employment is expected to involve conduct prohibited by statute or Federal regulation, including 5 CFR part 2635 and this part.
( c ) *Definition of employment.* For purposes of this section, the term compensated outside employment means any form of compensated non-Federal employment or business relationship involving the provision of personal services by the employee. It includes, but is not limited to, personal services as an officer, director, employee, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, general partner, trustee, teacher or speaker.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1441

REINA MARISOL RAMOS DE CHACON; V.K.C.R.; A.J.C.R.,

Petitioners,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: October 27, 2017 Decided: November 3, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdoul Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioners. Chad A. Readler, 

Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel, 

Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reina Marisol Ramos De Chacon and her two daughters, natives and citizens of El 

Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) 

dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of De Chacon’s application 

for asylum. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of De 

Chacon’s merits hearing before the immigration court and all supporting evidence. We 

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the 

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial 

evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 

(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED