alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

June 23, 2014



### Mr. John Maloney Director of Operations Florida West International Airways, Inc.

P.O. Box 025752 Miami, FL 33102-5752

Dear Mr. Maloney:

This is in response to your March 2, 2011 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0197) petitioning th e Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to initiate rulemaking to change the language in Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 121.689(a)(6). Specifically, the petition fo r rulemaking requested the FAA change “Minimum fuel supply (in gallons or pounds)” to “Minimum fuel supply.”

In accordance with 14 CFR 11.73, the FAA must use the following criteria when making

a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise;

2) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and

3) The resources we have availa ble to address these issues.

The FAA has a list for rulemaking projects that address many issues that are crucial to the safety of the aviation community and the tr aveling public. The F AA must prioritize its limited rulemaking resources so as to deliver the most value to the aviation system as a

whole. While the issues raised in your petition may have meri t, we have determined that the issue you raise is not an immediate safety concern.2 For the reasons above, we deny your petiti on for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR 11.73. Although the FAA has decided to deny the request, your comments and reasons for a rule change will be considered if the agency undertak es future rulemaking

in this area.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jodi L. Baker Deputy Assistant Manager, Ai r Transportation Division
### §702a–2. Abandonment of Boeuf Floodway

The Boeuf Floodway, authorized by the provisions adopted in section 702a of this title, shall be abandoned as soon as the Eudora Floodway, provided for in Flood Control Committee Document Numbered 1, Seventy-fourth Congress, first session, is in operative condition and the back protection levee recommended in said document, extending north from the head of the Eudora Floodway, shall have been constructed.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 548, §2, 49 Stat. 1509.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abandonment and Repeal of Projects

For abandonment of Boeuf Floodway and Eudora Floodway as well as Northward Extension and back protection levee extending from head of Eudora Floodway north to Arkansas River and repeal of provisions relating to prosecution of work, see section 702a–12 of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00086-CV

A. G. A. and W. F. A. M., Appellants

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY 

NO. 17-0150-CPS395, THE HONORABLE RYAN D. LARSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellants A.G.A. and W.F.A.M. filed their notices of appeal on

February 12, 2019, and February 14, 2019, respectively. The appellate record was complete

March 5, 2019, making appellants’ briefs due March 25, 2019. On March 20, 2019, and 

March 22, 2019, counsel for appellants filed motions for extension of time to file

appellants’ briefs.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motions and order counsel to file appellants’ briefs
2

no later than April 15, 2019. If the briefs are not filed by that date, counsel may be required to 

show cause why they should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on March 27, 2019.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Kelly and Smith
Exhibit  23.1

                           CONSENT OF BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Tag-It Pacific, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-84099) and on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-44592) of our report dated March 12, 2001 (except for Note 7
which is dated April 2, 2001), on our audits of the consolidated balance sheets
of Tag-It Pacific, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, which report is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                             /s/BDO Seidman, LLP



        Los Angeles, California

        March 12, 2001
# Appendix D to the 2015 Supporting Statement for Sub part W

Dated September 2015

Process and Combustion Costs per Segment

Years 1 through 3**Source Category Year 1** **through Year 3 No.** **Respondents (1,2)** **Total Responses** **Burden -** **Engineer (hrs)** **Burden -** **Managerial (hrs)** **Burden -** **Clerical (hrs)** **Burden -** **Legal (hrs)** **Total Burden (hrs)** **Total Labor Cost** **($) Capital** **Cost ($)** **O&M Cost ($)** **Total Cost ($)** Onshore Natural Gas PipelineTransmission, Process Emissions 183 183 4,941 - 458229 5,627 $463,577 $10,489 $0 $474,065Onshore Natural Gas PipelineTransmission, Combustion Emissions 0 0 - - - - - $0$0 $0 $0Onshore Natural Gas Gathering andBoosting, Process Emissions 200 200 8,097 300 500 250 9,147 $737,734 $11,400 $700,000 $1,449,134Onshore Natural Gas Gathering andBoosting, Combustion Emissions 0 0 - - - - - $0 $99,664 $340,000 $439,664Onshore Natural Gas Processing,Process Emissions 291 291 12,577 8,948 1,815 204 23,545 $1,799,230 $232,860 $124,257 $2,156,346Onshore NaturalGas Processing,Combustion Emissions 107 107 1,267 1,267 - 2,534 $236,577 $0 $0 $236,577Onshore Natural Gas TransmissionCompression, Process Emissions 1,152 1,152 66,6012,996 69,597 $5,162,921 $397,539 $1,161,170$6,721,630Onshore Natural GasTransmissionCompression, Combustion Emissions 349 349 4,132 4,132 - 8,264 $771,640 $0 $0 $771,640Underground Natural Gas Storage,Process Emissions 139 139 9,577 1,101 10,678 $815,124 $65,803 $115,189 $996,115Underground Natural Gas Storage,Combustion Emissions 85 85 1,006 1,006 - 2,013 $187,935 $0 $0 $187,935LNG Import and Export Equipment,Process Emissions 4 4 330 43 - 373 $29,496 $2,400$7,823 $39,718LNG Import and Export Equipment,Combustion Emissions 0 0 - - - - - $0 $0 $0 $0Onshore Petroleum and Natural GasProduction, Process Emissions 1,083 1,083 126,471 236 8,704 63 135,473 $10,747,628 $234,378 $0 $10,982,006Onshore Petroleum and Natural GasProduction, Combustion Emissions 1,083 1,083 12,23112,231 24,461 $2,394,515 $24,916 $85.000 $2,504,431Natural Gas Distribution, ProcessEmissions 159 159 17,862 1,247 19,109 $1,390,860$23,267 $254,082 $1,668,209Natural Gas Distribution, CombustionEmissions 0 0 - - - - - $0 $0 $0 $0LNG Storage, Process Emissions35351,9652352,200$172,700$14,883$27,434$215,016LNG Storage, Combustion Emissions3535414414-829$77,385$0$0$77,385Offshore Petroleum and Natural GasProduction, Process Emissions 72 72 1,467 - 387 1,854 $157,541 $0 $0 $157,541OffshorePetroleum and Natural GasProduction, Combustion Emissions 58 58 687 687 - 1,373 $128,238 $0 $0 $128,238**TOTAL 3,** **318 5,** **0 35** **2 69,** **625 9,** **48 4** **3 7,** **222 7** **46 31** **7, 076** **$25, 2** **73,098 $** **1 ,** **11 7,598** **$2,81 4,954** **$ 29, 2** **05,651**
Issue Date: 11/02/06 06-033 -1-

NRC INSPECTION MANUAL DIRS

Change Notice 06-033

DELETED: TRANSMITTED:

Number Date Number Date

1. IMC 0609 Att 1 11/22/05 IMC 0609 Att 1 11/02/06

2. IMC 0612 06/22/06 IMC 0612 11/02/06

3. IMC 0612 App B 09/30/05 IMC 0612 App B 11/02/06

4. IMC 1360 04/24/02 IMC 1360 11/02/06

TRAINING: None

REMARKS: IMC 0609 Att 1 (Significance and Enforcement Review Panel Process)

has been revised to add the security related cover letter. Also, added the

phrase “best available information” under section 2a.

IMC 0612 (Power Reactor Inspection Reports) has been revised to bring

the definition of performance deficiency in alignment with the basis for

performance deficiency as described in Reactor Oversight Process basis

document, IMC-0308, Attachment 3, "Significance Determination Process

Basis Document."

IMC 0612 App B (Issue Screening) has been revised to bring the definition

of performance deficiency in alignment with the basis for performance

deficiency as described in Reactor Oversight Process basis document,

IMC-0308, Attachment 3, "Significance Determination Process Basis

Document.".

IMC 1360 (Use of Physicians and Scientific Consultants in the Medical

Consultant Program ) has been revised to incorporate the procedural

changes for time and labor reporting of medical consultants and revised

terminology in the regulations.

DISTRIBUTION: Standard

END
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, ex cept under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estop pel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an o rder and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 2/27/96 TENTH CIRCUIT
JAMES PETER DARBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant, No. 95-1240 v. (D.C. No. 94-S-569) NADEEN JENSEN, in her official capacity and as an individual, and Unknown Unnamed Employees of the Internal Revenue Service, in their official capacities and as individuals; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, named as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in his or her official capacity and as an individual; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (D. Colo.)

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, thi s panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially as sist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered2

submitted without oral argument. We grant Mr. Darby’s Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Without Prepayment of Costs or Fees. The court also grants Mr. Darby’s Motion to Exceed Page Limitation in Reply Brief.
We AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district cou rt. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court PER CURIAM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

RECEIVED 

JUL 2 5 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

vs. 

Docket No. FAA-2013-1086 

FAA Case No. 2011S0190181 

PUERTO RICO POLICE DEPT., 

Respondent. Judge Sullivan 

MOTION TO DEEM ADMITTED 

The FAA's Complaint in this matter was filed on March 19, 2014. As of this date, 

Respondent has not filed an Answer. Accordingly, the FAA moves for the Complaint to be 

deemed admitted. The Respondent in this case was required to file an Answer (or other 

responsive pleading) within 30 days of the service ofthe Complaint. 14 C.F.R. § 13.209(a). Even 

adding 5 days because the service of the Complaint was only by mail, the Respondent's Answer 

was due by on or about April23, 2014. "A person's failure to file an answer without good cause 

shall be deemed an admission of the truth of each allegation contained in the complaint." 14 

C.F.R. § 13.209(f). As of this date, Respondent's Answer was due almost three months ago, but 

no Answer has been filed. Accordingly, the FAA moves that the allegations in the Complaint be 

deemed admitted, pursuant to § 13.209(f). 

,r 

Respectfully submitted this~ day of July, 2014, 

Christopher R. Stevenson 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing FAA's Motion to Deem Admitted has been sent this 

date by the following methods: 

original and one copy via certified mail: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

one copy via certified mail and facsimile: 

Nazihra M. Abdulralunan Soler 

Office of Legal Affairs 

Puerto Rico Police Department 

P.O. Box 70166 

San Juan, PR 00936-8166 

fax: (787) 781-7993 

Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

fax: (202) 366-2131 

~~fb Office of the Regional Counsel 

oor y, 2m4 

Dated
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1357] 

                    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u)                           ( print page 64026)                        (the Act), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:                 

*Whereas,*                     Broward County, Florida, grantee of FTZ 25, has requested authority under 15 CFR § 400.32(b)(1) of the Board's regulations on behalf of S.B. Marketing Worldwide, Inc., to process (screen printing) foreign-origin shirts for export under zone procedures within FTZ 25 (filed 7-30-2004, FTZ Docket 31-2004);                 

*Whereas,*                     pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(b)(1), the Commerce Department's Assistant Secretary for Import Administration has the authority to act for the Board in making such decisions on new manufacturing/processing activity under certain circumstances, including situations where the proposed activity is for export only (15 CFR 400.32(b)(1)(ii)); and,                 

*Whereas,*                     the FTZ Staff has reviewed the proposal, taking into account the criteria of 15 CFR 400.31, and the Executive Secretary has recommended approval;                 

*Now, therefore,*                     the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, acting for the Board pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the recommendation and hereby approves the request subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including 15 CFR 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October, 2004. 

James J. Jochum, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Attest:

Dennis Puccinelli, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-24551 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of Ambient Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal  Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: April 29, 2008



| |                                                                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ JOHN JOYCE                                                                                      
| | JOHN JOYCE                                                                                          
| | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-097 August 18, 2004

NRC APPROVES REQUEST BY UTAH

TO AMEND ITS AGREEMENT WITH AGENCY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request from Utah to amend its

Agreement under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act to assume regulatory authority over certain

additional radioactive material within the state. Under its Agreement with the NRC, Utah currently

regulates the medical, academic and industrial uses of radioactive material in the state as well as

commercial disposal of low-level radioactive waste.

Under the amendment, the NRC will transfer to Utah the responsibility for licensing,

inspection, enforcement and rulemaking activities for uranium and thorium milling operations and mill

tailings and other wastes, known as 11e.(2) byproduct material. Four existing NRC licenses will be

transferred to Utah’s jurisdiction. Utah becomes the sixth state to assume authority over this type of

material, after Colorado, Illinois, Ohio, Texas and Washington.

The amendment also makes an administrative change to the Agreement to reflect the return to

the NRC in 1996 of the regulatory authority for evaluation of sealed sources and devices.

An announcement of the proposed amendment was published earlier this year for four

consecutive weeks in the Federal Register for public comment. Only one response was received, and

the NRC determined that the comments did not affect the agency’s conclusion that Utah’s program for

this additional material is adequate to protect public health, safety and environment, and is compatible

with the NRC’s program.

The amendment to the Utah Agreement became effective August 16 upon signing by the

governor and will be published soon in the Federal Register. The amendment and supporting

documents will be available on the NRC’s ADAMS document management system. Help in using

ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room at 301-415-4737, or 1-800-397-

4209, or by sending an e-mail message to pdr@nrc.gov . These documents are also available for public

inspection at the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.

###
**Exhibit 3.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION**

 

First Advantage Corporation, a corporation organized andexisting under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify as follows: 

 

FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the FirstAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposedamendment is as follows: 

 

RESOLVED, that theFirst Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be further amended by changing Article IV, Paragraph A thereof so that, as amended, said Paragraph A of Article IV shall be and read as follows: 

 

A. This corporation is authorized to issue three classes ofstock to be designated, respectively, “Class A Common Stock”, “Class B Common Stock”, and “Preferred Stock.” The total number of shares of all classes of stock that this corporation is authorized to issue is200,000,000 shares, consisting of (1) 125,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, each having a par value of one-tenth of one cent ($.001); (2) 75,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, each having a par value of one-tenth ofone cent ($.001); and (3) 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, each having a par value of one-tenth of one cent ($.001). Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock shallbe identical and shall entitle the holders thereof to the same rights and privileges. 

 

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a special meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware were voted in favor of the amendment. 

 

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisionsof Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be duly executed as the     day of                     , 2005. 

 

FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION

By
 
 

Name
 
 

Title
 
 

 

-2-
#### § 1201.141 Judicial review.

An administrative law judge subject to a final Board decision authorizing a proposed agency action under 5 U.S.C. 7521 may obtain judicial review of the decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. 5 U.S.C. 7703.
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—GRANTS FOR CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISING OF TESTIMONY OF CHILDREN WHO ARE VICTIMS OF ABUSE