alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §668. "Hydraulic mining" and "mining by hydraulic process" defined

For the purposes of this chapter "hydraulic mining" and "mining by the hydraulic process" are declared to have the meaning and application given to said terms in the State of California.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §8, 27 Stat 508.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24599]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Employee Thrift Advisory Council; Open Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), a notice is hereby given of the 
following committee meeting:

    Name: Employee Thrift Advisory Council.
    Time: 10 a.m.
    Date: November 9, 2004.
    Place: 4th Floor, Conference Room, Federal Retirement Thrift 
Investment Board, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

    1. Approval of the minutes of the March 23, 2004, meeting.
    2. Report of the Executive Director on Thrift Savings Plan 
status.
    3. Parallel call center/dedicated main frame computer and data 
center.
    4. ``Life'' funds.
    5. Legislation.
    6. New business (spousal accounts).
    7. Frequency of meetings.
    For Further Information Contact: Elizabeth S. Woodruff, 
Committee Management Officer, on (202) 942-1660.

    Dated: October 29, 2004.
Elizabeth S. Woodruff,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 04-24599 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
#### § 1310.1 Policy guidelines.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Office of Management and Budget issues policy guidelines to Federal agencies to promote efficiency and uniformity in Government activities. These guidelines are normally in the form of circulars.
cc: Getiye Aschalew Dubale 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
      statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman
      American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.




/s/
                David SalzmanDavid
                SalzmanChief
                Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
                Corp., Manager of the RegistrantMarch
                28, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6652

JOHN EDWARD HAMMOND, Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, State of South Carolina Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-779-3-8BC) Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 7, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Edward Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eugene Bogan, OFFICEOF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The magistrate judge relied on our interpretation of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(d)(1) (West Supp. 2000), announced in Green v. French, 143 F.3d 865 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1090 (1999), to deny Hammond relief. The Supreme Court recently overruled that aspect of Green , however, in Williams v. Taylor , 120 S. Ct. 1495 (2000). We have reviewed Hammond’s appeal in light of Williams and conclude that the state habeas corpus court’s decision was not “‘contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.’” Williams , 120 S. Ct. at 1517 (quoting § 2254(d)(1)). 2 PER CURIAM: John E. Hammond seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * See Hammond v. South Carolina , No. CA-99-779-3-8BC (D.S.C. Apr. 14, 2000. We deny Hammond’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### George Butler, Appellant, v. Transit Development Company, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Can-, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
December 5, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ORLANDO SALINAS, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00378-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be 

certified below for observance.
### §526. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §135(e), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 174

Section, acts Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title V, §503, 60 Stat. 847; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), 96 Stat. 2440, provided that tolls charged for transit over any interstate bridge be just and reasonable and authorized Secretary of Transportation to prescribe reasonable rates of toll for such transit, which rates were to be legal rates demanded and received. See section 508 of this title.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No.  06-133 October 23, 2006

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS TO MEET NOVEMBER 1-3 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)will hold a public meeting Nov. 1-3 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the final reviewof the license renewal application for the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant, located near South Haven,Mich. The committee will also discuss proposed revisions to a regulatory guide related to fireprotection at nuclear power plants and a draft final rule related to emergency core cooling systems.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at11545 Rockville Pike. It will begin at 8:30 a.m. each day and end at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, 6:30 p.m.on Thursday, and 1 p.m. on Friday. A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at:http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2006/ . 

Anyone with questions or those wishing to make public statements during the meeting shouldcontact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364. To pursue videoconferencing services, contact TheronBrown, at 301-415-8066.

The ACRS advises the Commission on licensing and operation of nuclear power plants andrelated safety issues.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132663 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132663 

 COA: 273204 

Branch CC: 03-087899-FH 

DOUGLAS HARRY GOODGER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           71446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 71446
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  151899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      165462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    151899
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1831
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.004
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 2.2
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
 Amendment Company Argo-Tech Trustee Parent Acquisition Sub
 WHEREAS Original
Agreement Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 ARTICLE 1. Defined Terms
 ARTICLE 2. Amendments to Original Agreement and Disclosure Schedules
 Amendment to Section 1.1
 Restricted Subsidiary
 Amendment to Section 2.3
 Sections
7.1(c) (f) Sections 7.3(a) (t) Sections 7.1(c) (f) Sections 7.3(a) (t)




---



##### 



Amendments to Section 2.8
     Amendments to Section 2.12
  Section 6.7(c) Argo-Tracker
Proceeds
    - 2 -




---



##### 



Section 2.12(a) Section 2.8 Section 2.12(a) Sections 2.12(a)(iii)(A) and (B)
 Amendments to Section 6.1
  provided
  provided
 - 3 -




---



##### 



provided
   Amendment to Section 7.1
 Amendment to Section 8.5
  ARTICLE 3. Miscellaneous
 Governing Law
 Consent to Jurisdiction
 - 4 -




---



##### 



(x) (y) clause (x) Section 11.3 clause (x) (y)
 WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL SECTION 3.3
 Headings
 Counterparts
 Notices
 [Signatures appear on the following page.]
 - 5 -




---



##### 



,
 AT HOLDINGS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Michael S. LipscombName:
    Michael S. LipscombTitle:
    President and CEOARGO-TECH CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Michael S. LipscombName:
    Michael S. LipscombTitle:
    President and CEOGREATBANC TRUST COMPANY, IN ITS 
CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE ARGO-
TECH CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK 
OWNERSHIP PLANBy:
    /s/ Marilyn MarchettiName:
    Marilyn MarchettiTitle:
    Senior Vice PresidentV.G.A.T. INVESTORS, LLCBy:
    /s/ Steven SilverName:
    Steven SilverTitle:
    Vice PresidentVAUGHN MERGER SUB, INC.By:
    /s/ Steven SilverName:
    Steven SilverTitle:
    Vice President - 6 -
Exhibit 10.11




	


Exhibit 10.11





SUPPLEMENTAL GUARANTY 



September 29, 2003 



Bank One, NA, as
Administrative Agent  
for the Banks 



Ladies and Gentlemen: 



        Reference
is hereby made to (i) that certain Credit Agreement dated as of July 30, 2002, among
M.D.C. Holdings, Inc., the banks from time to time parties thereto (the
“Banks”), and Bank One, NA, as Administrative Agent (the “Administrative
Agent”) for the Banks (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from
time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) and (ii) that certain Guaranty, dated as
of July 30, 2002, executed and delivered by the Guarantors parties thereto in favor of the
Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Banks (as amended, restated, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”). Terms not defined herein
which are defined in the Credit Agreement shall have for the purposes hereof the
respective meanings provided therein. 



        In
accordance with Section 7.11 of the Credit Agreement and Paragraph 18 of the Guaranty, the
undersigned, RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF FLORIDA, LP, a limited partnership organized under
the laws of Colorado, hereby elects to be a “Guarantor” for all purposes of the
Credit Agreement and the Guaranty, respectively, effective from the date hereof. 



        Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby agrees to perform all the
obligations of a Guarantor under, and to be bound in all respects by the terms of, the
Guaranty, to the same extent and with the same force and effect as if the undersigned were
a direct signatory thereto. 



        This
Supplemental Guaranty shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the internal
laws of the State of Illinois (but otherwise without regard to the conflict of laws
provisions). 



        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Supplemental Guaranty has been duly executed by the undersigned as
of the 29th day of September, 2003. 










			RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES OF FLORIDA, LP


By:   Richmond American Homes of
            
California (Inland Empire), Inc.
          Its General Partner


          By: /s/ John J. Heaney
          
——————————————

          Name:  John J. Heaney
          Title:  Vice President
§ 131.650 Closeout procedures. ( a ) *General.* Closeout procedures are used to ensure that the WBC program funds and property acquired or developed under the WBC cooperative agreement are fully reconciled and transferred seamlessly between the recipient organization and other Federal programs. The responsibility of conducting closeout procedures is vested with the recipient organization whose cooperative agreement is being relinquished, terminated, non-renewed, or suspended.
( b ) *Responsibilities* — ( 1 ) *Recipient organizations.* When a WBC cooperative agreement is not being renewed or a WBC is terminated, regardless of cause, the recipient organization will address the following in its closeout process and perform the necessary inventories and reconciliations prior to submitting the final annual financial report. ( i ) An inventory of WBC property must be compiled, evaluated, and all property and the aggregate of usable supplies and materials accounted for in this inventory.
( ii ) Program income balances will be reconciled and unused WBC program income which is not used as match or cannot otherwise be used to offset legitimate expenditures of the WBC must be returned to the SBA.
( iii ) Client records, paper and electronic, will be compiled to facilitate an SBA program closeout review.
( iv ) Financial records will be compiled to facilitate a closeout of the SBA financial examination.
( 2 ) *SBA.* Upon receipt of the final annual financial report from a non-renewing or terminated recipient organization, the AA/OWBO will issue disposition instructions to the former recipient organization.
( c ) *Final disposition.* ( 1 ) The final financial status report from the recipient organization must include the information identified in the inventory process and identify any WBC program income collected for services provided.
( 2 ) The AA/OWBO will issue written disposition instructions to the recipient organization providing the following: ( i ) The name and address of the entity or agency to which property and program income must be transferred;
( ii ) The date by which the transfer must be completed;
( iii ) Actions to be taken regarding property and WBC program income;
( iv ) Actions to be taken regarding WBC program records such as client and training files; and
( v ) Authorization to incur costs for accomplishing the transfer. Such costs may, when authorized, be applied to residual WBC program income or Federal or matching funds.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-003 March 29, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT PALO VERDE NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Arizona Public Service Co. officials

on April 5, to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Palo Verde

Nuclear Generating Station during 2005.

The 6:30 p.m. meeting at Saddle Mountain Unified School District Administration

Building Board Room, 38201 W. Indian School Road, in Tonopah, Az., is open to public

observation. Before the session ends, NRC staff will be available to answer questions on the

plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe operation.

“Each year, the NRC assesses the performance of all of the nation’s commercial nuclear

power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “The meeting gives us an

opportunity to discuss our findings with the company, local officials and members of the public.

We look forward to meeting with members of the community and answering any questions they

may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2005 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/palo_2005q4.pdf .

Palo Verde has been under increased NRC scrutiny since 2004 when problems with

voiding in a portion of a suction line for the plant’s emergency core cooling system were

identified. “Improvements have been noted in identifying and resolving problems and in human

performance at the site, but not sufficient for the NRC to decrease our oversight in these areas,”

Mallett said. “We plan to discuss some of these during the meeting.”

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas, and the agency’s

headquarters in Rockville, Md. In addition to routine inspections, the NRC plans to perform a
follow-up supplemental inspection to determine that actions have been taken to correct problems

regarding air trapped in portions of the emergency core cooling system at all three units. 

Current information for Palo Verde is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/PALO1/palo1_chart.html .

###
§ 351.202 Coverage. ( a ) *Employees covered.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to each civilian employee in: ( 1 ) The executive branch of the Federal Government; and
( 2 ) Those parts of the Federal Government outside the executive branch which are subject by statute to competitive service requirements or are determined by the appropriate legislative or judicial administrative body to be covered hereunder. Coverage includes administrative law judges except as modified by part 930 of this chapter.
( b ) *Employees excluded.* This part does not apply to an employee: ( 1 ) In a position in the Senior Executive Service; or
( 2 ) Whose appointment is required by Congress to be confirmed by, or made with the advice and consent of, the United States Senate, except a postmaster.
( c ) *Actions excluded.* This part does not apply to: ( 1 ) The termination of a temporary or term promotion or the return of an employee to the position held before the temporary or term promotion or to one of equivalent grade and pay.
( 2 ) A change to lower grade based on the reclassification of an employee's position due to the application of new classification standards or the correction of a classification error.
( 3 ) A change to lower grade based on reclassification of an employee's position due to erosion of duties, except that this exclusion does not apply to such reclassification actions that will take effect after an agency has formally announced a reduction in force in the employee's competitive area and when the reduction in force will take effect within 180 days. This exception ends at the completion of the reduction in force.
( 4 ) The change of an employee from regular to substitute in the same pay level in the U.S. Postal Service field service.
( 5 ) The release from a competitive level of a National Guard technician under section 709 of title 32, United States Code.
( 6 ) Placement of an employee serving on an intermittent, part-time, on-call, or seasonal basis in a nonpay and nonduty status in accordance with conditions established at time of appointment.
( 7 ) A change in an employee's work schedule from other-than-full-time to full-time. (A change from full-time to other than full-time for a reason covered in § 351.201(A)(2) is covered by this part.)
[51 FR 319, Jan. 3, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 3062, Jan. 13, 1995]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2004 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


March 23, 2004