alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stan Cipkowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

/s/ Stan Cipkowski
Chief Executive Officer

Date:  December 1, 2006
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                    Washington, DC 20555-001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov                               Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 05-154 (revised) November 10, 2005

 NRC CONSIDERS CLARIFICATIONS TO REQUIREMENTSFOR  NEW REACTOR LICENSING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering revisions to clarify its regulationsconcerning the licensing and approval processes for nuclear power plants.

The changes would address requirements that apply to licensing processes such as Early SitePermits (ESP), Design Certifications and Combined Licenses. Experience gained in the NRC’s reviewof ESP and Design Certification applications, as well as substantial public comments, led to theproposed rule changes.

“This rule change would clarify the relationship between Part 50 of our regulations and theprocesses available today in Part 52, ” said David Matthews, Director of the Division of New ReactorLicensing in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “These changes would make the NRC’slicensing process more effective and efficient for future applicants.”

 The proposed rule is described in a staff paper to the Commissioners, available on the NRCWeb site at this address: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/2005/.  Theproposed rule would supersede a 2003 proposal that the agency would withdraw. If approved, the newproposed rule would be published in the Federal Register for public comment. For more informationcontact NRC staff members Jerry Wilson or Nanette Gilles by phone at 301-415-3145 and 301-415-1180 respectively, or via e-mail at jnw@nrc.gov and nvg@nrc.gov respectively.

###
#### § 293.310 Response to requests for information.

The Office, or an agency in physical possession of an OPF in response to a third party Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request may disclose information as provided in this subpart. A current employee's request for access to his/her own OPF (also included are employee performance file system folders and files) that cites the FOIA, as with all stated Privacy Act requests made by current employees, shall be processed in accordance with agency Privacy Act procedures consistent with Office regulations in part 297 of this chapter. All requests for their OPFs from former employees, and FOIA requests for former employee OPFs, shall be referred to the Office's regional or area office nearest to the location of the requester.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-009 March 31, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 NRC TO MEET WITH ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO.

 TO DISCUSS PALO VERDE PERFORMANCE ISSUES

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Arizona Public Service Co. officials

on April 5 to discuss performance trends at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. APS operates the

plant, located about 55 miles west of Phoenix, Ariz.

The meeting will be from 1:00 to 5:00 p.m. in the NRC’s Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. 

The public is invited to observe the meeting and will have one or more opportunities to communicate

with the NRC after the business portion, but before the meeting is adjourned. Persons interested in

participating in the conference via telephone can do so by calling (800) 952-9677 and asking to be

transferred to the meeting.

In its annual assessment of plant performance, the NRC staff identified deficiencies in human

performance and problem identification and resolution at the plant.

###
### §402. Construction of bridges, etc., over Illinois and Mississippi Canal

The provisions of section 401 of this title are made applicable alike to the completed and uncompleted portions of the Illinois and Mississippi Canal. Whenever the Secretary of the Army shall approve plans for a bridge to be built across said canal he may, in his discretion, and subject to such terms and conditions as in his judgment are equitable, expedient, and just to the public, grant to the person or corporation building and owning such bridge a right of way across the lands of the United States on either side of and adjacent to the said canal; also the privilege of occupying so much of said lands as may be necessary for the piers, abutments, and other portions of the bridge structure and approaches.

(June 13, 1902, ch. 1079, §10, 32 Stat. 374; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from part of act June 13, 1902, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1902".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions, powers, and duties of Secretary of the Army and other offices and officers of Department of the Army under section 401 of this title to extent that they relate generally to location and clearances of bridges and causeways in navigable waters of United States transferred to and vested in Secretary of Transportation by Pub. L. 89–670, §6(g)(6)(A), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 941. Pub. L. 97–449 amended section 401 of this title to reflect transfer made by section 6(g)(6)(A) of Pub. L. 89–670, and repealed section 6(g)(6)(A).
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-006 February 10, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

TO HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in King of Prussia, Pa., have selected Ted Wingfield

as the new resident inspector at the Hope Creek nuclear power plant in Hancocks Bridge, N.J. He joins

NRC Senior Resident Inspector George Malone at the site.

Wingfield first joined the NRC as a Reactor Engineer in the Region I Division of Reactor

Safety in August 2003. Most recently he was a project engineer in the regional office. 

“Ted Wingfield has the experience and commitment to safety that will help the NRC ensure

that Hope Creek conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect public health and

safety," said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins.

Prior to joining the NRC, Wingfield worked at Exelon Nuclear’s Peach Bottom Atomic Power

Station in several positions including cycle manager, senior reactor operator and operations

coordinator. He also worked as a sales engineer at BOC Gases in Lyle, Ill. He served in the United

States Navy for five years.

Wingfield earned a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the United States Naval Academy at

Annapolis, Md., and a master’s in business administration from the University of Delaware. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They

serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Hope Creek resident inspectors can be reached at 856/935-5373.

#
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[MT-060-01-1020-PG]


Notice of Public Meeting; Central Montana Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central Montana Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 24 & 25, 2004, at the Grand 
Union Hotel in Fort Benton, Montana. The February 24 meeting will begin 
at 1 p.m. with a 30-minute public comment period. The meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at approximately 7:30 p.m. The February 25 meeting 
will begin at 8 a.m. with a 60-minute public comment period. This 
meeting will also adjourn at approximately 7:30 p.m.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 15-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior on a variety of management issues associated with 
public land management in Montana. At this meeting the council will 
discuss:
    An overview of the alternative formulation for the Upper Missouri 
River Breaks National Monument Resource Management Plan;
    Recommendations for a working preferred alternative for this 
management plan;
    Field manager update;
    And, additional updates on the Fort Benton Interpretive Center, 
proposed grazing regulations, the Blackleaf Environmental Impact 
Statement and the Lewis and Clark Bicentennial.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time 
allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the timer for individual 
oral comments may be limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Mari, Lewistown Field Manager, 
Lewistown Field Office, Airport Road, Lewistown, Montana 59457, (406) 
538-7461.

    Dated: January 30, 2004.
David L. Mari,
Lewistown Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 04-2398 Filed 2-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
#### § 2601.105 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Agency* means the U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

*Authorized agency official* means the Director of OGE or the Director's delegee.

*Director* means the Director of OGE.

*Employee* means an employee of OGE.

*Gift* means any gift, donation, bequest or devise of money, use of facilities, personal property, or services and may include travel reimbursements or payments for attendance at or participation in meetings or events.

*Money* means currency, checks, money orders or other forms of negotiable instruments.

*Personal property* means all property, tangible or intangible, not defined as real property, and includes stocks and bonds.

*Prohibited source* means any source described in 5 CFR 2635.203(d).

*Services* means all forms of voluntary and uncompensated personal services.

*Use of facilities* means use of space, equipment and all other facilities.

[68 FR 60594, Oct. 22, 2003, as amended at 80 FR 57072, Sept. 22, 2015]
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2343

___________ Judith Walther, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Everest & Jennings, Inc.; Everest & * Jennings International, Ltd., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendants - Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 11, 1997 Filed: January 12, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Aft er losing $55,000,000 in 1993, Everett & Jennings, Inc. (EJI), merged with Medic al Composite Technologies (MCT). Though EJI was the surviving company , MC T’s owner became the chief executive officer of the merged businesses. I n Febru ary 1984, EJI terminated Judith Walther as its Vice-President of Internationa l Sales and Marketing, the stated reason being that the company in retrenching woul d concentrate i ts efforts on domestic sales. Walther commenced this action against EJI and a subsidiary, alleging age and sex discrimination.The HONORABLE DONALD J. STOHR, United States District Judge for the 1 Eastern District of Missouri. -2- The d istrict court granted summary judgment in favor of EJI, concluding that 1 undisputed facts demonstrate (1) Walther was terminated as part of a reduction-in-force resulting from l egitimate economic concerns; (2) she produced no evidence satisfying the additional

showing of unlawful discrimination that is required to establish a prima fac ie case of discrimination in reduction-in-force cases, see Nitschke v. McDonnel l Douglas Cor p. , 68 F.3d 249, 251 (8th Cir. 1995); and (3) even if she established a prima facie case, Walther presented no probative evidence that EJI’s legitimate nondiscrim inatory reason for discharge was a pretext for intentional age or se x discrimination. Walther appeals. After careful de novo review of the record and the district court’s analysis, we conclude that the court’s conclusions are well supported by the summary judgment record. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §1445. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for the first fiscal year after October 23, 1972, and for the next two fiscal years thereafter such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter, but the sums appropriated for any such fiscal year may not exceed $6,000,000. There are authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $1,500,000 for the transition period (July 1 through September 30, 1976), not to exceed $5,600,000 for fiscal year 1977, and not to exceed $6,500,000 for fiscal year 1978, not to exceed $11,396,000 for fiscal year 1981, not to exceed $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1982, not to exceed $10,635,000 for fiscal year 1986, not to exceed $11,114,000 for fiscal year 1987, not to exceed $13,500,000 for fiscal year 1989, and not to exceed $14,500,000 for fiscal year 1990.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title II, §205, formerly §204, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1061; Pub. L. 94–62, §3, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 303; Pub. L. 94–326, §3, June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 725; Pub. L. 95–153, §2, Nov. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 1255; Pub. L. 96–381, §2, Oct. 6, 1980, 94 Stat. 1523; renumbered §205 and amended Pub. L. 99–272, title VI, §6064, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 132; Pub. L. 100–627, title I, §103, Nov. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 3213.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 205 of Pub. L. 92–532, which was classified to this section, was renumbered section 204 and is classified to section 1444 of this title.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–627 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $13,500,000 for fiscal year 1989 and not to exceed $14,500,000 for fiscal year 1990.

1986—Pub. L. 99–272 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $10,635,000 for fiscal year 1986 and not to exceed $11,114,000 for fiscal year 1987.

1980—Pub. L. 96–381 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $11,396,000 for fiscal year 1981 and not to exceed $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1982.

1977—Pub. L. 95–153 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $6,500,000 for fiscal year 1978.

1976—Pub. L. 94–326 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $5,600,000 for fiscal year 1977.

1975—Pub. L. 94–62 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $1,500,000 for the transition period (July 1, through Sept. 30, 1976).
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04762**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04762\04762_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04762\04762_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04762\04762_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04762\04762_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04762\04762_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 04762\Supporting Documentation\04762_Arial Map.pdf.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04762\Supporting Documentation\04762_Water Balance.pdf.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04762\Supporting Documentation\04762_Water Balance2.pdf.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04762\04762_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04762\04762_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONI, Michael B. Wheeler, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December31, 2006 of Tufco Technologies, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 14, 2007                    /s/ Michael B. Wheeler   Michael B. Wheeler   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1639.13 Antialienation of funds in Thrift Savings Plan participant accounts.

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8437, net assets available for Thrift Savings Plan benefits will not be used to satisfy a debt owed by a participant to an agency under the regulations of this part or under the debt collection regulations of any agency.