alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §516. Apportionment of cost

At the time the Secretary shall authorize the bridge owner to proceed with the project, as provided in section 515 of this title, and after an opportunity to the bridge owner to be heard thereon, the Secretary shall determine and issue an order specifying the proportionate shares of the total cost of the project to be borne by the United States and by the bridge owner. Such apportionment shall be made on the following basis: The bridge owner shall bear such part of the cost as is attributable to the direct and special benefits which will accrue to the bridge owner as a result of the alteration, including the expectable savings in repair or maintenance costs; and that part of the cost attributable to the requirements of traffic by railroad or highway, or both, including any expenditure for increased carrying capacity of the bridge, and including such proportion of the actual capital cost of the old bridge or of such part of the old bridge as may be altered or changed or rebuilt, as the used service life of the whole or a part, as the case may be, bears to the total estimated service life of the whole or such part: Provided, That in the event the alteration or relocation of any bridge may be desirable for the reason that the bridge unreasonably obstructs navigation, but also for some other reason, the Secretary may require equitable contribution from any interested person, firm, association, corporation, municipality, county, or State desiring such alteration or relocation for such other reason, as a condition precedent to the making of an order for such alteration or relocation. The United States shall bear the balance of the cost, including that part attributable to the necessities of navigation: And provided further, That where the bridge owner proceeds with the alteration on a successive partial bid basis the Secretary is authorized to issue an order of apportionment of cost for the entire alteration based on the accepted bid for the first part of the alteration and an estimate of cost for the remainder of the work. The Secretary is authorized to revise the order of apportionment of cost, to the extent he deems reasonable and proper, to meet any changed conditions.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §6, 54 Stat. 499; July 16, 1952, ch. 889, §2, 66 Stat. 733; Pub. L. 85–640, §1(c), Aug. 14, 1958, 72 Stat. 595.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–640 permitted issuance of an order of apportionment of cost for entire alteration based on the accepted bid for first part of alteration and an estimate of cost for remainder of work where bridge owner proceeds with alteration on a successive partial bid basis.

1952—Act July 16, 1952, made railroads share equally with proprietors of highways in bearing cost of alterations necessary to remove obstacles to navigation.
### §2286. Acceptance of certain funds for mitigation

The Secretary is authorized to accept funds from any entity, public or private, in accordance with the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act [16 U.S.C. 839 et seq.] to be used to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife in connection with projects constructed or operated by the Secretary. The Secretary may accept and use funds for such purposes without regard to any limitation established under any other provision of law or rule of law.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1146, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4253.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–501, Dec. 5, 1980, 94 Stat. 2697, which is classified principally to chapter 12H (§839 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 839 of Title 16 and Tables.
472 P.2d 985

#### STATE ex rel. Donovan O. COTTON, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT COURT FOR BERNALILLO COUNTY, New Mexico, and the Honorable Paul F. Larrazolo, District Judge, and Salomon O. Vallejos, Clerk of the District Court, Respondents.

No. 9104.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Aug. 10, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T17:55:06-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.405 Calculation of normal value based on constructed value. ( a ) *Introduction.* In certain circumstances, the Secretary may determine normal value by constructing a value based on the cost of manufacture, selling general and administrative expenses, and profit. The Secretary may use constructed value as the basis for normal value where: neither the home market nor a third country market is viable; sales below the cost of production are disregarded; sales outside the ordinary course of trade, or sales the prices of which are otherwise unrepresentative, are disregarded; sales used to establish a fictitious market are disregarded; no contemporaneous sales of comparable merchandise are available; or in other circumstances where the Secretary determines that home market or third country prices are inappropriate. (*See* section 773(e) and section 773(f) of the Act.) This section clarifies the meaning of certain terms relating to constructed value.
( b ) *Profit and selling, general, and administrative expenses.* In determining the amount to be added to constructed value for profit and for selling, general, and administrative expenses, the following rules will apply: ( 1 ) Under section 773(e)(2)(A) of the Act, “foreign country” means the country in which the merchandise is produced or a third country selected by the Secretary under § 351.404(e), as appropriate.
( 2 ) Under section 773(e)(2)(B) of the Act, “foreign country” means the country in which the merchandise is produced.
STATE OF DELAWARE
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                          ---------------------------

     DELTA MILLS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue
of the General  Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware  (the  "Corporation"),
does hereby certify:

     1. The  Board of Directors  of the  Corporation  duly  adopted  resolutions
setting forth a proposed amendment to the Restated  Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation,  declaring such amendment to be advisable and submitted such
amendment to the Corporation's sole stockholder for consideration  thereof.  The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

          RESOLVED,  that  the  Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation of  the
     Corporation be amended by adding a new Article Nine as follows:

     NINTH: No director of the Corporation shall have personal  liability to the
     Corporation  or  its  stockholders  for  monetary  damages  for  breach  of
     fiduciary  duty as a  director,  provided  that  the  foregoing  shall  not
     eliminate  or limit the  liability  of a director (i) for any breach of the
     director's duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for
     acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct
     or a knowing  violation  of law;  (iii)  under  Section  174 of the General
     Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware;  (iv) for any  transaction  from
     which the director derived an improper personal benefit; or (v) for any act
     or  omission  occurring  prior  to the  date of the  effectiveness  of this
     Article.

     2. Thereafter,  a unanimous written consent setting forth the amendment was
signed by the  Corporation's  sole  stockholder  pursuant  to Section 228 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     3. The  amendment  was duly adopted in  accordance  with the  provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  said  corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed
this 27th day of June, 2005.


                                        DELTA MILLS, INC.



                                        By:  /s/ William H. Hardman, Jr.
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Name: William H. Hardman, Jr.
                                            Title:  Executive Vice President,
                                                    Secretary, Treasurer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1556-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio (FEMA-1556-DR), dated September 19, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 22, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 19, 2004: 

Lawrence County for Individual Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs; 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-24182 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan J. Kent,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002* ,
      that,
      to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the*Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934*;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                for the periods presented.

















/s/
      Allan
      J. Kent


------------------


Allan
      J.
      Kent


Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




May
      14,
      2007
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-041 July 30, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC PROPOSES $24,000 FINE AGAINST WESTINGHOUSE FOR ALLEGED

VIOLATIONS AT COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR FUEL PLANT IN COLUMBIA, S. C.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $24,000 civil penalty against

Westinghouse Electric Company for alleged violations of nuclear safety requirements at its

commercial nuclear fuel plant in Columbia, S.C.

NRC officials said the proposed civil penalty is based on a Severity Level II problem

comprised of eight alleged violations resulting from the company’s discovery of uranium ash deposits

in a plant incinerator off-gas system that exceeded allowable limits.

The NRC said there were no actual adverse consequences as a result of the problem. The

amount of ash would not have supported a nuclear reaction, or criticality, at the concentration and

shape in which it was found. However, the agency said the potential safety consequences were

"significant" because the company failed to establish, implement and maintain all criticality control

systems as required. 

The Westinghouse Columbia Nuclear Fuel Plant has no reactor but manufactures low-enriched

uranium fuel for use at commercial nuclear power plants. A “criticality” accident at this type of

facility would involve a sudden, localized “burst” of radiation in a production area inside the plant due

to having too much fissile material in one place in a container of the wrong shape. 

The NRC said the alleged violations were categorized collectively as a Severity Level II (the

agency’s second most serious) violation because, although no adverse consequences occurred, the

factors involved collectively resulted in a significant increase in the likelihood of a nuclear criticality

event.

NRC officials said the company has taken steps to preclude a recurrence of the problem and

that Westinghouse has 30 days from receipt of the notification of the proposed civil penalty to pay it or

to protest it, in whole or in part.

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Robert Hummel, et al.,*                     Case No. 00 C 5184, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on October 25, 2004. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against the Defendants pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for filling wetlands without a permit.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree requires the defendants to: (1) pay a civil penalty, (2) remove and re-route a 500′ sewer line that was illegally placed through a wetland, and (3) restore the impacted wetland. The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this notice. Please address comments to Kurt Lindland, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, 5th Floor, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604 and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Robert Hummel, et al.*                     Case No. 00 C 5184, including the USAO #1999V011338.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed on the World Wide Web at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​open.html.*

Kurt N. Lindland,

Assistant United States Attorney.

[FR Doc. 04-24592  Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### § 177.108 Referral to Department of Justice.

When Department of Justice approval or consultation is required, or the advice of the Department of Justice is otherwise to be requested, under § 177.107, the written referral or request will be transmitted to the Department of Justice by the General Counsel of OPM or his or her designee.
### §5353. Information collection and dissemination with respect to grant recipients

(a) Applicant and Grantee Information.—

(1) Application process.—The Secretary shall issue requests for proposal, as necessary, regarding, with respect to the grants awarded under section 5352, the application process, grant renewal, and suspension or withholding of renewal grants. Each application under this paragraph shall be in writing and shall be subject to review by the Secretary.

(2) Reporting.—The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable and in a manner consistent with applicable law, minimize reporting requirements by a grant recipient and expedite any application for a renewal grant made under this part.

(b) Activities of Secretary.—The Secretary may—

(1) evaluate the utility of specific initiatives relating to the purposes of the program;

(2) conduct an evaluation of the program; and

(3) disseminate information described in this subsection to—

(A) eligible State local law enforcement agencies or prosecutors; and

(B) the general public.

(Added Pub. L. 105–310, §2(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2948.)
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Comparison of Average Transport and Dispersion Among a Gaussian, a Two-Dimensional, and a Three-Dimensional Model (NUREG/CR-6853)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6853 (PDF - 4.39 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2004**Date Published:**October 2004

**Prepared by:** C.R. Molenkamp Atmospheric Science Division  Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory 7000 East Avenue Livermore, California 94550

N.E. Bixler, C.W. Morrow Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-0748 

J.V. Ramsdell, Jr. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352

J.A. Mitchell, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6785

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The simplifying atmospheric transport and dispersion assumption used by MACCS2, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's code for predicting off-site consequences, is tested by comparison to ADAPT/LODI, a state-of-the-art, three-dimensional advection-dispersion code. Also included in the comparison is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's code for rapid emergency response, RASCAL, and a newer related code with upgraded dispersion and deposition modules, RATCHET. Meteorological data for the test were provided by the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program Southern Great Plains site in central Oklahoma and Kansas, a site with a unique and comprehensive set of mesoscale meteorological data. Each model was run in its normal manner to produce the annual average integrated exposure and deposition for a series of rings at 16.1, 32.2, 80.5, and 160.9 km (10, 20, 50, and 100 miles) from a hypothetical release, and the integrated exposure and deposition for arc-sectors at the same set of distances and the 16 compass directions. Nearly all the annual average ring exposures and depositions and the great majority of the arc-sector values for MACCS2, RASCAL, and RATCHET were within a factor of two of the corresponding ADAPT/LODI values.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Thursday, March 25, 2021