alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toresa Lou, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|May 22, 2006           
|                       
|/s/    TORESA LOU      
|Toresa Lou,            
|Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GLOBAL EPOINT, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Pan, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|May 22, 2006                        
|                                    
|/s/    JOHN PAN                     
|John Pan,                           
|Chief Financial Officer and Chairman

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Stan
Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Stan CipkowskiStan
      CipkowskiChief
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
#### Grover *vs.*Wyckoff’s Executor and another.

The executor of A sued B and C jointly, upon a joint and several ¡promissory note, held by his testator at the time of his death, and recovered judgment. Subsequently B filed his bill in this court, alleging that he neither signed the note nor authorized any one to do so for him, and that he did not know of its existence until after A’s death. It further alleged that C fraudulently signed complainant’s name to the note, and that the executor sued the complainant and 0 jointly, so that the complainant, by reason of the executor’s suing in a representative capacity, could neither testify himself, nor avail himself of C’s testimony, to prove the fraud. It prayed an injunction against the executor and the sheriff, to restrain a sale. The executor pleaded the trial and judgment in bar, and answered the bill. *Held,*that the fact that the complainant was unable 'to avail himself, on the trial at law, of his own testimony or of that of 0, was no ground for relief.

*76Bill for relief. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs.

*Mr. J. F. Hageman,*for complainant.

*Mr. R. M. J. Smith,*for defendants.

The Chancellor.

The bill is filed for relief against a judgment at law. The complainant and William C. Forman were sued together, in an action of *assumpsit*in the Supreme Court, by the defendant, Abram B. Wyckoff, as executor of Cornelius Wyckoff, deceased, on a joint and several promissory note, purporting to have been made by them, and judgment for $844.39 was recovered therein against them, on the 5th of November, 1873. The note was held by Cornelius Wyckoff. at the time of his death. It was given to him at or about the time of its date, April 25th, 1867. The bill alleges that the complainant neither signed it nor authorized any one to do so for him, and that he did not know of its existence until after the'death of Cornelius Wyckoff. It further alleges that the defendant Wyckoff caused the complainant and Forman (who, it states, fraudulently signed the complainant’s, name to the note,) to be sued together, so that the complainant, seeing that the defendant Wyckoff sued in a representative capacity, could neither .testify himself, nor avail himself of the testimony of Forman, to prove the fraud. It prays an injunction. The defendant Wyckoff (the other defendant is the sheriff of Middlesex), pleaded the trial, verdict and judgment in bar, and answered the bill.

There is no evidence whatever, of any fraud on the part of' the executor, in obtaining the judgment. The fact that the-complainant was unable to avail himself, on the trial at law, of his own testimony, or of that of Forman, is no ground for relief. The law made both of them incompetent to testify, under the circumstances.

The bill will be dismissed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-920-1310-01; WYW130117] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease. 

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease WYW130117 for lands in Johnson County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Fluid Chief Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $166 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW130117 effective September 1, 2003, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis,

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. 04-24665 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
### §2347b. Purpose and need

#### (a) Purpose and need statements

#### (1) In general

Not later than 90 days after the date of receipt of a complete application for a water storage project, the District Engineer shall develop and provide to the applicant a purpose and need statement that describes—

(A) whether the District Engineer concurs with the assessment of the purpose of and need for the water storage project proposed by the applicant; and

(B) in any case in which the District Engineer does not concur as described in subparagraph (A), an assessment by the District Engineer of the purpose of and need for the project.

#### (2) Effect on environmental impact statements

No environmental impact statement or environmental assessment required under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall substantially commence with respect to a water storage project until the date on which the District Engineer provides to the applicant a purpose and need statement as required under paragraph (1).

#### (b) Appeals request

A non-Federal interest may use the administrative appeals process described in part 331 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations (or any succeeding regulation), in relation to a decision of the Secretary related to an application for a water storage project.

(Pub. L. 115–270, title I, §1126, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018, and also as part of the America's Water Infrastructure Act of 2018, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 102 of Pub. L. 115–270, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
#### § 2610.305 Comments by other parties.

Any party to a proceeding other than the applicant and agency counsel may file comments on an application within 30 days after it is served, or on an answer within 15 days after it is served. A commenting party may not participate further in proceedings on the application unless the adjudicative officer determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit full exploration of matters raised in the comments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          18,980
<SECURITIES>                                    11,129
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                       807
<INVENTORY>                                     36,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,098
<PP&E>                                          33,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 185,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,196
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   185,782
<SALES>                                         50,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,132
<CGS>                                           31,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,430
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), 3-A Sanitary Standards, Inc. (“3-A SSI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: 3-A Sanitary Standards, Inc., McLean, VA. The nature and scope of 3-A SSI's standards development activities are: The development, maintenance and publishing of standards for the sanitary design, fabrication, installation and operation of equipment and machinery in the following areas: Vessels; fillers; valves and fittings; pumps and mixers; heat exchangers; conveyors and feeders; instruments; concentrating equipment; farm/raw milk; cheese and butter equipment; process and cleaning systems; plant support systems; materials and materials testing; and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.

Additional information may be obtained from Timothy R. Rugh, CAE, Executive Director of 3-A Sanitary Standards, Inc., at (703) 790-0295.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24567  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Charles Agnew, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edward Graham et al., Defendants in Error.

Gen. No. 5,887.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Joe A. Davis, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Appeal dismissed.

Opinion filed November 13, 1913.

Statement of the Case.

Information in the nature of a quo warranto filed by the People of the State of Illinois on the relation *218of Charles Agnew against Edward Graham, F. E. Blakeslee and P. J. Cruise charging that defendants were unlawfully holding and executing the positions of mayor and alderman of the city of Earlville, and the positions of president, secretary and member of the board of local improvements of said city, and prayed that they be required to answer by what warrant they and each of them claimed to hold and execute said offices. Respondents filed a plea setting up their title to said offices. A general and special demurrer was interposed to said plea, and the demurrer was overruled and the People elected to abide by its demurrer. The court entered a rule on the People to reply instanter, defaulted the People for want of a reply, found the respondents not guilty, and entered a judgment that the defendant recover from the People, on the relation of Charles Agnew, their costs, with execution therefor.

From the order, plaintiff prosecutes an appeal.

L. B. Olmstead, Butters & Armstrong and George S. Wiley, for plaintiff in error.

John Faissler, for defendants in error.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Appeal and eerob, § *284*
      ***
      *—form of final judgment.*A final judgment after a demurrer to a plea had been overruled and the plaintiff had elected to abide by the demurrer should be “that the plaintiff take nothing by its suit and that the defendants go hence without day,” followed by a judgment for costs.

2. Appeal and error, § *278*
      ***
      *—when judgment entered on overruling a demurrer not a final judgment.*Where plaintiff’s demurrer to a plea has been overruled and the plaintiff has elected to abide by its demurrer, it is improper for the court to enter a rule upon plaintiff to reply and to default plaintiff and enter a finding on his failure to reply; and on appeal from the order such matters *219appearing in the record are surplusage and the appeal will be dismissed for want of a final judgment.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

*218Per Curiam.

*2193. Quo warranto, § *58*
      ***
      *—when execution should not he awarded against People for costs.*On information filed by the People on the relation of a person, a judgment for costs should not award an execution therefor against the People, although it may be awarded against the relator.
### §417. Expenses of investigations by Department of the Army

Expenses incurred by the Engineer Department of the Department of the Army in all investigations, inspections, hearings, reports, service of notice, or other action incidental to examination of plans or sites of bridges or other structures built or proposed to be built in or over navigable waters, or to examinations into alleged violations of laws for the protection and preservation of navigable waters, or to the establishment or marking of harbor lines, shall be payable from any funds which may be available for the improvement, maintenance, operation, or care of the waterways or harbors affected, or if such funds are not available in sums judged by the Chief of Engineers to be adequate, then from any funds available for examinations, surveys, and contingencies of rivers and harbors.

(Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1482, §6, 33 Stat. 1148; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions, powers, and duties of Secretary of the Army and other offices and officers of Department of the Army under section 401 of this title to extent that they relate generally to location and clearances of bridges and causeways in navigable waters of United States transferred to and vested in Secretary of Transportation by Pub. L. 89–670, §6(g)(6)(A), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 941, which created Department of Transportation. Pub. L. 97–449 amended section 401 of this title to reflect transfer made by section 6(g)(6)(A) of Pub. L. 89–670, and repealed section 6(g)(6)(A).
### §569a. Temporary employment of experts or consultants; compensation

The Chief of Engineers is authorized to procure the temporary or intermittent services of experts or consultants or organizations thereof in connection with civil functions of the Corps of Engineers without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5: Provided, That individuals so engaged may be paid at rates not to exceed the daily equivalent of the rate for GS–18 for each day of their services.

(July 3, 1930, ch. 847, §6, 46 Stat. 948; May 17, 1950, ch. 188, title I, §105, 64 Stat. 168; Pub. L. 91–611, title I, §104, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1819.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5" substituted in text for "the Classification Act as amended" on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–611 substituted provision that compensation "may be paid at rates not to exceed the daily equivalent of the rate for GS–18 for each day of their services" for "shall not be paid in excess of $100 per day for their services".

1950—Act May 17, 1950, amended section generally, providing for employment of experts and consultants and omitting provisions relating to stenographic assistance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.