alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region III

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-076 December 15, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (639) 829-9662

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING DECEMBER 18 ON ENVIRONMENTAL 

SCOPING PROCESS FOR CLINTON EARLY SITE PERMIT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff will hold a public meeting on December 18

in Clinton, Illinois, to discuss the agency’s review of the Early Site Permit (ESP) application for

the Clinton site and the environmental issues the NRC should consider in reviewing the

application. 

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. at the Vespasian Warner Public Library, 310 N. Quincy

Street, Clinton. The meeting’s proceedings, including any follow-up answers the staff provides

later, will be transcribed and made available on the NRC website. NRC staff will be available

before the meeting for informal discussions with members of the public during an “open house”

session from 6 - 7 p.m. No formal comments on the environmental review will be accepted

during the open house.

The meeting will include an overview of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

environmental review process, the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Statement, the

NRC’s proposed review schedule and the opportunity for the public to submit comments and

suggestions on the environmental issues.

The ESP process allows an applicant to resolve site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, before possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant. Exelon’s

application was filed September 25. If approved, the ESP would give Exelon up to 20 years to

decide whether to build one or more nuclear plants on the site, and to file an application with the

NRC for approval to begin construction. There will also be a full technical review of the

application which will address site safety, environmental protection, and plans for coping with

emergencies, independent of the review of a specific nuclear plant design. Following that review 
- 2 -

and issuance of a safety evaluation and environmental impact statement, the Commission will

hold a hearing on the matter.

Those wishing to present their comments at the meeting may register on the day of the

meeting no later than 6:45 p.m. Individual comments could be limited by the time available,

depending on how many people wish to speak.

Information about new reactor licensing and the Clinton Early Site Permit can be found at

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactor-licensing.html.

###
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan
J. Kent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Allan
J. Kent


------------------








Allan J.
Kent


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


June 19,
2008
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 12
                                                                      ----------

                     ARGO-TECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<Table>
<Caption>
                                                              Fiscal Year Ended

                                    October 25,   October 31,   October 30,    October 28,     October 27,
                                        1997         1998          1999           2000             2001
                                    -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------     -----------
                                                            (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Historical:
     Income from operations          $26,650        $28,059        $33,846        $25,352        $38,159
     Other, net                         (404)          (268)          (516)          (402)           (51)
                                     -------        -------        -------        -------        -------
Earnings as Adjusted                 $27,054        $28,327        $34,362        $25,754        $38,210
                                     =======        =======        =======        =======        =======
     Fixed charges:
     Interest expense                $12,827        $21,030        $25,003        $25,644        $24,534
                                     =======        =======        =======        =======        =======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed               2.1x           1.3x           1.4x           1.0x           1.6x
Charges
</Table>
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1645

To establish a research, development, and demonstration program in genetics, 

protein science, and computational biology of microbes and plants to 

support the energy and environmental mission of the Department of 

Energy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2003

Mr. BOEHLERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Science 

A BILL

To establish a research, development, and demonstration program in genetics, protein science, and computational biology of microbes and plants to support the energy and 

environmental mission of the Department of Energy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GENOMES TO LIFE. 

4 (a) PROGRAM.—

5 (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary shall es6 tablish a research, development and demonstration 

7 program in genetics, protein science, and computa8 tional biology of microbes and plants to support the 
2

•HR 1645 IH 

1 energy and environmental mission of the Depart2 ment. 

3 (2) GRANTS.—The program shall support indi4 vidual investigators and multidisciplinary teams of 

5 investigators through competitive, merit-reviewed 

6 grants. 

7 (3) CONSULTATION.—In carrying out the pro8 gram, the Secretary shall consult with other Federal 

9 agencies that conduct genetic and protein research. 

10 (b) GOALS.—The program shall have the goal of de11 veloping technologies and methods based on the biological 

12 functions of microbes and plants that—

13 (1) can facilitate the production of fuels, includ14 ing hydrogen; 

15 (2) convert carbon dioxide to organic carbon; 

16 and 

17 (3) detoxify soils and water at Department fa18 cilities contaminated with heavy metals and radio19 logical materials. 

20 (c) PLAN.—

21 (1) DEVELOPMENT OF PLAN.—Within one year 

22 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec23 retary shall prepare and transmit to the Congress a 

24 research plan describing how the program author25 ized pursuant to this section will be undertaken to 
3

•HR 1645 IH 

1 accomplish the program goals established in section 

2 (b). 

3 (2) REVIEW OF PLAN.—The Secretary shall 

4 contract with the National Academy of Sciences to 

5 review the research plan developed under this sub6 section. The Secretary shall transmit the review to 

7 the Congress not later than 6 months after trans8 mittal of the research plan under paragraph (1), 

9 along with the Secretary’s response to the rec10 ommendations contained in the review. 

11 (d) FACILITIES.—In carrying out the program under 

12 this section, the Secretary may construct, acquire and op13 erate facilities necessary to carry out this section. 

14 (e) NO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH.—In carrying out 

15 this program, the Secretary shall not conduct biomedical 

16 research. 

17 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

18 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec19 retary of Energy such sums as may be necessary for each 

20 of the fiscal years 2004 through 2007 to carry out this 

21 Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 03, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 03, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0259. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. DALE ADAMS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16EV005072
§ 1312.26 Control of secret and confidential material. Classified material will be accounted for by the office having custody of the material. OMB Form 87, Classified Document Control, will be used to establish accountability controls on all Secret material received or produced within OMB offices. No accountability controls are prescribed for Confidential material, but offices desiring to control and account for such material should use the procedures applicable to Secret material. Information classified by another agency shall not be disclosed without that agency's authorization. ( a ) *Accountability Control Clerks.* Each division or office head will appoint one person as the Accountability Control Clerk (ACC). The ACC will be the focal point for the receipt, routing, accountability, dispatch, and declassification downgrading or destruction of all classified material in the possession of the office.
( b ) *OMB Form 87.* One copy of OMB Form 87 will be attached to the document, and one copy retained in the accountability control file for each active document within the area of responsibility of the ACC. Downgrading or destruction actions, or other actions removing the document from the responsibility of the ACC will be recorded on the OMB Form 87, and the form filed in an inactive file. Inactive control forms will be cut off annually, held for two additional years, then destroyed.
( c ) *Working papers and drafts.* Working papers and drafts of classified documents will be protected according to their security classification, but will not be subject to accountability control unless they are forwarded outside of OMB.
( d ) *Typewriter ribbons.* Typewriter ribbons, cassettes, and other devices used in the production of classified material will be removed from the machine after each use and protected as classified material not subject to controls. Destruction of such materials will be as prescribed in § 1312.29.
( e ) *Reproduction.* Classified material will be reproduced only as required unless prohibited by the originator for the conduct of business and reproduced copies are subject to the same controls as are the original documents. Top Secret material will be reproduced only with the written permission of the originating agency.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-1543

Robert M. Gates, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,

Appellant,

v.

RAYTHEON COMPANY,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in no. 54907,

Administrative Judge Jack Delman.

ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the Secretary of Defense's unopposed motion for leave to

file a corrected joint appendix,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 0 4 2009	

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk	FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

MAR 0 4 2009

JAN HUlibithY

CLERK

cc:	C. Coleman Bird, Esq.

Karen L. Manos, Esq.

s8
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Maxx Builders, LLC v. Edward L. Story, Individually and as the 

Representative of the Estate of Karen L. Story

Appellate case number: 01–15–00850–CV

Trial court case number: 15–CV–0393

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Counsel for appellant, Maxx Builders, LLC, has filed a motion to withdraw, complaining 

of a lack of cooperation and nonpayment of attorney’s fees. We grant the motion; however, we 

note that by granting this motion, Maxx Builders will be unrepresented by counsel in this appeal. 

Generally speaking, a corporation may only participate in an appeal if represented by counsel. 

See Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1997); 

Globe Leasing, Inc. v. Engine Supply & Machine Serv., 437 S.W.2d 43, 45-46 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] 1969, no writ). 

Accordingly, we order appellant, Maxx Builders, LLC, to retain new counsel and for new 

counsel to file an appearance in this Court within 30 days from the date of this order. If no 

appearance is filed, this appeal may be dismissed. See Digital Press, Inc. v. American City Bus. 

Journal, No. 01–01–00585–CV, 2001 WL 1587635, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 

13, 2001, no pet.) (dismissing appeal because no attorney filed a notice of appearance as 

ordered); MHL Homebuilder LLC v. Dabal/Graphic Resource, No. 14–05–00295–CV, 2005 WL 

1404475, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] June 16, 2005, no pet.)(dismissing appeal for 

failure to comply with order requiring proof of retention of attorney to represent corporation).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 23, 2016
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Maternity Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward M. Krell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL    
|Edward M. Krell        
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 7, 2010            



33
Amendment 1996 Stock Incentive Plan



 
EXHIBIT 10.12

 
AMENDMENT TO 
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC. 
1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 
This AMENDMENT TO KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC. 1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Amendment”), dated as of August 20, 2002, is made and adopted by Keystone Automotive
Industries, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings to them in the Plan (as defined below). 
 
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Keystone Automotive
Industries, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan); 
 
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan; and 
 
WHEREAS, this Amendment was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of the Company’s Common Stock voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, at which a quorum was present, on August 20, 2002. 
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 

	  	 1.	  	 Section 5(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

 
“At any time, the aggregate number of Common Shares issued and issuable pursuant to all Awards
(including all Incentive Stock Options) granted under this Plan shall not exceed 2,700,000 subject to adjustment as provided in Section 8 hereof.” 
 

	  	 2.	  	 This Amendment shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Plan. 

 

	  	 3.	  	 All other terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to
be executed by its duly authorized officer(s), effective as of August 20, 2002. 
 

	  KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

 a California corporation

	
	  By:
	   	        /s/    JAMES
LOCKWOOD        


	  Name:
	   	      James Lockwood


	  Title:
	   	      Secretary
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Keith E. Palmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of American
Bio Medica Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and


/s/ Keith E. Palmer
-------------------
Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President

Date:  February 24, 2006
Response to OMB Comments on CO NAAQS

Rosalina Rodriguez to: Kymn, Christine J. 08/04/2011 04:38 PM

Cc:

Lydia Wegman, Richard Wayland, Karen Martin, Lewis Weinstock, 

Deirdre Murphy, Nealson Watkins, Joseph Somers, David Orlin, 

James Hemby, Bill Lamason, Sherry Russell

Hi, Christine:

Attached is a file with our response to the 2 comments we received with respect to monitoring under the 

CO NAAQS, currently under OMB review (with court ordered deadline for signature of August 12). 

Specifically, the two comments we addressed are: (1) rationale for the 1 million population threshold, and 

(2) consideration of comments regarding safety concerns for near-road monitors.

Please let us know if you have further comments. Thank you.

Rosalina M. Rodriguez

Associate Division Director, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, USEPA

919-541-5298

 Response to OMB 8-4-11 V3.docx
§ 317.305 Conversion of excepted appointees. ( a ) *Coverage.* This section covers employees serving under an excepted appointment in a position: ( 1 ) In Schedule C of subpart C of part 213 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations;
( 2 ) Filled by noncareer executive assignment under subpart F of part 305 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations;
( 3 ) In the Executive Schedule under subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 5, United States Code, other than a career Executive Schedule position; or,
( 4 ) Filled under an authority equivalent to paragraph (a) (1), (2), or (3) of this section.
( b ) *Senior Executive Service appointment.* An employee covered by this section shall be subject to one of the following actions. ( 1 ) If the employee's position is designated a “general” position, the agency may convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service noncareer appointment. The employee may be assigned only to a “general” position.
( 2 ) If the employee's position is designated a “career reserved” position, the agency may convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service noncareer appointment and assign the employee to a “general” position. The employee cannot remain in a “career reserved” position.
( 3 ) If the employee subject to § 317.302(a) or § 317.302(d) has reinstatement eligibility to a position in the competitive service, or, as determined by the Office of Personnel Management, had substantial career-oriented service under a career-type appointment as defined in § 317.304(a)(2), the employee may request conversion to a career appointment. Such request must be made on or before the end of the notice period. ( i ) If the request is approved by the Office, the agency will convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service career appointment. The employee may be assigned to a “general” or a “career reserved” position. The name of the individual and basis for approving the request must be published in the Federal Register.
( ii ) If the employee's request for conversion to career is not approved by the Office, or if the employee elects not to make such a request, the agency will convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service noncareer appointment. The employee may be assigned only to a “general” position.
( 4 ) In lieu of action under paragraph (b) (1), (2), or (3) of this section, the agency may separate the employee from the civil service.