alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6087-6088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01838]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Science.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific 
Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). The Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Tuesday, March 5, 2013, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Wednesday, March 6, 2013, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: American Geophysical Union (AGU), 2000 Florida Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20009-1277.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melea Baker, Office of Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research; SC-21/Germantown Building; U. S. 
Department of Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue SW; Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone (301) 903-7486

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide 
advice and recommendations to the Department of Energy on scientific 
priorities within the field of advanced scientific computing research.
    Tentative Agenda Topics:
     View from Washington
     View from Germantown
     Report from DOE data-intensive science and Facilities 
prioritization subcommittees
     Computational Science Graduate Fellowship (CSGF) 
Longitudinal Study
     Update on Exascale including technical talks from ASCR 
researchers
     Facilities update
     ESnet-5
     Co-design

[[Page 6088]]

     Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and 
Experiment (INCITE)
     Public Comment (10-minute rule)
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. A webcast 
of this meeting will be available. Please check the Web site below for 
updates and information on how to view the meeting. If you would like 
to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Melea 
Baker by telephone at: (301) 903-7486 or email: 
Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least five business days prior to the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for viewing 
on the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Advanced Scientific 
Computing Web site at: www.sc.doe.gov/ascr.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on January 23, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-01838 Filed 1-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-50558

Summary Calendar

Billy Ray Jackson, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Bryan Daniel, in his individual capacity; Julian 

Alvarez, III, in his individual capacity; Aaron 

Demerson, in his individual capacity, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:21-CV-1107

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Billy Ray Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in forma 

pauperis contesting Texas’s withdrawal, under 15 U.S.C. § 9025(a)(1), from 

the supplemental unemployment benefits provided under the CARES Act. 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50558 Document: 00516487024 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2022
No. 22-50558

2

Given that the statute expressly allows such a withdrawal upon providing 

thirty days’ written notice (which Texas did), the district court dismissed the 

case under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Jackson’s appellate brief fails to 

demonstrate any error in this determination. We AFFIRM. Jackson’s 

motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

Case: 22-50558 Document: 00516487024 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2022
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. 19 Richards Street Corporation, Appellant.

*1030No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, J J.
§ 2635.107 Ethics advice. ( a ) As required by § 2638.104(a) and (d) of this chapter, each agency has a designated agency ethics official and an alternate designated agency ethics official; these are the employees who have the primary responsibility for directing the daily activities of an agency's ethics program. Acting directly or through other officials, the designated agency ethics official is responsible for providing ethics advice and counseling regarding the application of this part.
( b ) Employees who have questions about the application of this part or any supplemental agency regulations to particular situations should seek advice from an agency ethics official. Disciplinary action for violating this part or any supplemental agency regulations will not be taken against an employee who has engaged in conduct in good faith reliance upon the advice of an agency ethics official, provided that the employee, in seeking such advice, has made full disclosure of all relevant circumstances. When the employee's conduct violates a criminal statute, reliance on the advice of an agency ethics official cannot ensure that the employee will not be prosecuted under that statute. However, good faith reliance on the advice of an agency ethics official is a factor that may be taken into account by the Department of Justice in the selection of cases for prosecution. Disclosures made by an employee to an agency ethics official are not protected by an attorney-client privilege. Agency ethics officials are required by 28 U.S.C. 535 to report any information they receive relating to a violation of the criminal code, title 18 of the United States Code.
Honorable A. C. poster 

County Attorney 

Haakell, Texas 

Dear Mr. Foster: Opinion No. o-5331 

Re: Can the county judge of Haskell 

County also hold the office of Area 

Supervisor of the Aircraft Warning 

Service and the Office of County Defense Coordinator. 

We have given Oar0fUl consideration to the question submitted 

by You In Your letter of May 21, 1943, which reads as follows: 

?l?he county judge of this county aeked me to write 

you for your opinion as to whether or'~dt he can 

legally hold office of Area Supervisor'Lf the Aircraft 

Warning Service to which he has been appointed * * * 

and the office of County Defense Coordinator to which 

he has been appointed * * * while at the same time 

holding the office of county judge. The first twooffices named pay no salary." 

We have read with Interest the opinion you gave Judge Ivy 

the county judge of Haskell county, 

May 21, 1943. 

In your letter to him of 

We think you have correctly answered the 

inquiry that the county judge may hold the office of Area 

Supervisor' of the Aircraft Warning Service and the office of 

County Defense Coordinator at the same time he holds the 

office of County Judge of Haekell County. 

Aa we understand the facts relative theceto, the services 

to be performed by the "Area Supervisor of the Aircraft Warning 

Service" as well as the office of "County Defense Coordinator" 

do not aonstltute either of said positions an office of honor 

or trust such as Is prohibited by our Constitution. As we 

understand, membership in each of said organizations is entirely 

voluntary and for the purpose of rendering an unselfish and a 

purely patriotlo servloe during the duration of the war., 

Yenps very truly 

A'ITORNEYG~RALOFTEXAS 

s/ Geo. W. Barcua 

APPROVED JULY 3, 1943 

a/ Grover Sellers 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

AmC,RWRV ,-,RWRRAT. 

Aesletant 

E#P~DCOMMITTEE 

By BWB,ChaiAan
#### § 1900.100 Cross-references to employee ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations.

Officers and employees of the Appalachian Regional Commission Federal Staff are subject to the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch at 5 CFR part 2635 and the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634.

[60 FR 62702, Dec. 7, 1995; 61 FR 13051, Mar. 26, 1996]
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code), the undersigned officer of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (**“the Company”**), herby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the **“Report”**) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: April 1, 2015 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, UnitedStates Code), the undersigned officer of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (the **“Company”**), herby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the **“Report”**) of the Company fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2015 

 

/s/ Andrés Osorio Hermansen
Andrés Osorio HermansenCFO LATAM
#### § 2417.206 Final determination.

The Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel, as appropriate, makes the final determination on demands or requests to employees thereof for production of official records and information or testimony in civil litigation under this part. All final determinations are within the sole discretion of the Chairman of the FLRA, the General Counsel, or the Chairman of the Panel, as appropriate. The appropriate decision-maker will notify the requester and, when appropriate, the court or other competent authority of the final determination, the reasons for the grant or denial of the request, and any conditions that may be imposed on the release of records or information, or on the testimony of an employee. This final determination exhausts administrative remedies for discovery of the information.

[81 FR 63363, Sept. 15, 2016]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0 13 0 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - CE - 0 0 5 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
### §2234. Nonapplicability to Saint Lawrence Seaway

Sections 2231, 2232, and 2233 of this title do not apply to any harbor or inland harbor project for that portion of the Saint Lawrence Seaway administered by the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title II, §206, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4102; Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title V, §512(c)(5)(A), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2756.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation" for "Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation".
### §6652. Compensation of employees of Chaplain of Senate

The Chaplain of the Senate may appoint and fix the compensation of such employees as he deems appropriate, except that the amount which may be paid for any fiscal year as gross compensation for personnel in such Office for any fiscal year shall not exceed $147,000.

(Pub. L. 91–145, Dec. 12, 1969, 83 Stat. 340; Pub. L. 100–202, §101(i) [title I, §2(b)], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–290, 1329–294; Pub. L. 101–163, title I, §10, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 61d–1 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–163 substituted "such employees as he deems appropriate, except that the amount which may be paid for any fiscal year as gross compensation for personnel in such Office for any fiscal year shall not exceed $147,000" for "a secretary".

1987—Pub. L. 100–202 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The Chaplain may appoint and fix the compensation of a secretary at not to exceed $8,541 per annum."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Increases in Compensation

Increases in compensation for Senate officers and employees under authority of Federal Pay Comparability Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–655), see Salary Directives of President pro tempore of the Senate, set out as notes under section 4571 of this title.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Barrett J,O’Connor, certify that:

 

I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EFC Bancorp, Inc.;

 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

(b)              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s controls and procedures and presented inthis annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation.

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)               Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| March 19,  2004               |
|-------------------------------|
| /s/ Barrett  J. O’Connor |   |
| Barrett J.  O’Connor     |
| Chief  Executive Officer      |

 

----
§ 2606.201 Requests for access. ( a ) *Records in an OGE Governmentwide system of records.* An individual requesting access to records pertaining to him in an OGE Governmentwide system of records should submit a written request, which includes the words “Privacy Act Request” on both the envelope and at the top of the request letter, to the appropriate system manager as follows: ( 1 ) *Records filed directly with OGE by non-OGE employees:* The Deputy Director, Office of Agency Programs, Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917;
( 2 ) *Records filed with a Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO) or the head of a department or agency:* The DAEO at the department or agency concerned; or
( 3 ) *Records filed with the Federal Election Commission by candidates for President or Vice President:* The General Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463.
( b ) *Records in an OGE Internal System of Records.* An individual requesting access to records pertaining to him in an OGE internal system of records should submit a written request, which includes the words “Privacy Act Request” on both the envelope and at the top of the request letter, to the Deputy Director, Office of Administration and Information Management, Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917.
( c ) *Content of request.* ( 1 ) A request should contain a specific reference to the OGE system of records from which access to the records is sought. Notices of OGE systems of records subject to the Privacy Act are published in the Federal Register, and copies of the notices are available on OGE's Web site at *http://www.usoge.gov ,* or upon request from OGE's Office of General Counsel and Legal Policy. A biennial compilation of such notices also is made available online and published by the Office of Federal Register at the GPO Access Web site (*http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/PrivacyAct.shtml*) in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(f) of the Act.
( 2 ) If the written inquiry does not refer to a specific system of records, it should include other information that will assist in the identification of the records for which access is being requested. Such information may include, for example, the individual's full name (including her maiden name, if pertinent), dates of employment, social security number (if any records in the system include this identifier), current or last place and date of Federal employment. If the request for access follows a prior request to determine if an individual is the subject of a record, the same identifying information need not be included in the request for access if a reference is made to that prior correspondence, or a copy of the response to that request is attached.
( 3 ) The request should state whether the requester wants a copy of the record, or wants to examine the record in person.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-165 December 6, 2005

NRC REVISES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR

 NORTH ANNA EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is revising its schedule for issuing an Environmental

Impact Statement (EIS) for an Early Site Permit (ESP) at the North Anna site in Louisa County, Va.,

about 40 miles northwest of Richmond.

 The ESP applicant, Dominion Nuclear North Anna, LLC, informed the NRC on Nov. 22 that it

intends to supplement its application no later that Jan. 13, 2006, modifying the proposed cooling

method for a potential third reactor at the North Anna site. Because of this late change to the ESP

application, NRC staff will not issue a final EIS on Dec. 23 as initially scheduled. A new schedule for

completing review of the EIS and the overall North Anna ESP will be determined once Dominion

provides the revised application.

The ESP process allows an applicant to resolve certain safety and environmental issues related

to siting prior to submitting an application to build a new nuclear power plant. An ESP denotes a site’s

suitability for construction and operation of a nuclear plant.

Dominion filed the North Anna application on Sep. 25, 2003. If approved, the permit would

allow Dominion to reserve the site for up to 20 years. A future application for a construction permit or

combined license at the North Anna site could then reference the ESP.

“We’ve stopped work on the affected portions of the EIS, but we’ll continue working on the

rest of the statement until the remaining portions are completed,” said Dave Matthews, Director of the

Division of New Reactor Licensing in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “Substantially

changing an application this late in the process requires us to make adjustments in our available

resources.”

The staff must complete its final Safety Evaluation Report and the EIS, the NRC’s independent

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards must issue a report on the ESP application, and an NRC

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel must conclude a hearing on the application before the

Commission can reach a final conclusion on issuing the ESP.

###