alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 30, 2021

No. 04-20-00228-CR

Jorge RODRIGUEZ, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CRB000030D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

On March 9, 2021, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to conduct an 

abandonment hearing pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

On March 19, 2021, the trial court conducted an abandonment hearing via Zoom and found that 

appellant still desires to prosecute this appeal and neither appellant nor counsel has abandoned 

the appeal. On March 29, 2021, appellant’s counsel filed the brief.

Accordingly, we ORDER the abatement lifted and reinstate this appeal on this court’s 

docket. We further ORDER the State to file its brief by April 28, 2021.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of March, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date: August 07, 2009

 
| /s/ Gregory E. Lichtwardt           |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory E. Lichtwardt               |   |
| Executive Vice President, Treasurer |   |
| and Chief Financial Officer         |   |

 

----
### I^ ^ ^1^3_^ * 

### !^ ' ,_; t E' s 

### ; w 'f i 11

:1tr>7ttst E>. 20 13

'Fhc 1 Ionarabli; C;inrt 1dcC'My :lclrrl i n i strtttor t ' .5. FIrlvlrC?nlllttltal l a rt)tCc'tli)tl A^,t~11Cy 

### 1200 PCntlSyIVttttia;AlVCnttC.'ti.li'. W,rsliing

, 

### tarr. 1)C.' 20460 I )eair Admini:;Urrrtcar McC'Grr'thy: Wt «curt ta jcAn c7rrr c.crlleatWrcs on thc 5errtttc C'rrt7trraittee orz Sr17,r1) I3tasirttrSS' iir askirr g tltc 1°:1 1 .A to re-GE°alutttc tlrc cr7st, (Mn smUll busirlcSsts at'tllc prcrlxrsecl reVisic>rt5 h) thG rrrlcicr g rotincl stcrrttgc: t.rnl: (U c ;T) rrgulaticros. latrhlishccl in the Fecleral Itcgistcr cm Nover7lher 18. 2011. \t'hile l;PA e5tirxiatccl ttre ,utnrrdi;red cost OCthc rcrlc. car7 srnall htrsitlessCs tc3 he S4t){) per leGrr, sm:rll buirres:; irieiu::trv ev.pert5 e5tin3atc the c:c7sts ttt S6.900 Iicr year. "I lrc lnr g r clispEtrity iri cost estim:rtr:s tivctrr{tms cr tluuougtt rctiln4 of ` flre cc>mpliance cost crnalysis. Wit11 95 paccrrt c}I`tht iniljactccl firnns bi;ing srrtcrl) bttsirrc;sses.. it is criticul tlrat tlte cost artt3lysis hroperlr` 1-c1TCct tlIc.^ liill cOst Ot'tl'te rulc. Irt t't'-cVtrlutztitl, " the ccast5 Ol' tlic rulc. we ask tlrat ynu rcrich cmt tci the smrrll knrsinc;sses inili4tcteci by t1w rule to boter rittcltrstanil ho\\ , tlae rttic wortJt) imhru:t tliern linancirrlly. \^'c look ('01'Warcl ta your prc)mlat rcho^ `Hhrtnk yc>u firr yorir ccrtrsicic=rmion.

Sinc^rcl^^. 

### .^
4 i lKay

4 ^iil R. ^^la^ ^rll ^-01^
cc; !)r% i\ irislow 1. ;argearrt. ('hiel'(.'r,crnscl. Cc5. Slrrcrll 13uNirress Wirrtirtisu'ation. 017icc tit 

### :1dvcrcacv Ile I-hncarErWe l,.rrrclr'iCu. 01air. l'.S. ScnEite C'011111ritiGe On S111all 13usirn:ss 1 hc 11onur,rl31e Jmncs 1:. lZisch. R.rrnhing h^lerrthm. tt.S. Senatc ('omn7itts:i orl Srnrall (3usincs4
FILED

June 19, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

 AT JACKSON

 JUNE 1997 SESSION

JESSIE LEE BISHOP, ) 

) C.C.A. No. 02C01-9609-CR-00301 

Appellant, )

) Shelby County

V. )

) Honorable Carolyn Wade Blackett, Judge

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conviction)

) 

Appellee. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

Jessie Lee Bishop, Pro Se Charles W. Burson

No. 90028-201 Attorney General & Reporter 

F.C.I. Memphis

P.O. Box 34550 Sarah M. Branch 

Memphis, TN 38184-0550 Counsel for the State

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243

William L. Gibbons 

District Attorney General

James J. Challen III

Assistant District Attorney General

Suite 301, 201 Poplar Avenue

Memphis, TN 38103

OPINION FILED: ___________________

AFFIRMED

PAUL G. SUMMERS,

Judge
-2-

O P I N I O N

The appellant, Jessie Lee Bishop, has been convicted of various offenses

between 1970 and 1988. In 1996 he filed a petition for post-conviction relief

attacking these convictions. The trial court dismissed the petition on the ground

that it was barred by the statute of limitations.

The appellant's most recent conviction became final in 1988. At that time

the law allowed three years to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Tenn.

Code Ann. § 40-30-102 (1990). The appellant's time period for filing his petition

expired in 1991. Therefore, his petition is time barred.

Accordingly, we find no error of law mandating reversal. The trial court's

dismissal of the petition is affirmed in accordance with Tenn. R. Ct. Crim. App.,

Rule 20. 

________________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge

CONCUR:

____________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, Judge

____________________________

JOE G. RILEY, Judge
### §108. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 108 was editorially reclassified as section 6571 of this title.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                    Washington, DC 20555-001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov                               Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 06-007                                                                                                          January 19, 2006

DIAZ NAMES JEANNE LOPATTO FEDERAL/INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Nils J. Diaz has appointed Jeanne Lopatto, aveteran of 22 years in federal government, to the newly created position of special assistant for Federaland International Programs.

Ms. Lopatto, whose most recent government service was as Director of Public Affairs for theU.S. Department of Energy, will report directly to Diaz.

“I’m pleased to have someone with Ms. Lopatto’s breadth of experience on my office staff. Her background will enable the NRC to have a more cohesive federal and international liaison effort,”Diaz said in announcing her appointment to his personal staff.

In her position at the Energy Department, Ms. Lopatto served as the spokesperson for thenSecretary Spencer Abraham, as well as other department officials, and managed DOE’s media andpublic relations programs.  She was a member of official delegations to a variety of internationalconferences on topics including oil and gas development, oil supply issues, nuclear power, climatechange, nuclear non-proliferation programs and technology development.  She organized a number ofmedia events at meetings of the International Atomic Energy Agency, international energy forums, theInternational Energy Agency, meetings of the G-8 energy ministers and U.S.-Russia CommercialEnergy Summits.

As Director of Public Affairs at DOE, she worked closely with other government agencies,including the Departments of State, Commerce and Homeland Security, the Environmental ProtectionAgency and the National Security Council.

Prior to that Ms. Lopatto had a long career on Capitol Hill, including her service as the presssecretary for the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee under Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah.  She alsoworked in media positions on Sen. Hatch’s personal staff as well as the Senate Labor and HumanResources Committee.

She holds a B.A. in American Studies from Dickinson College in Carlisle, Pa.

###
#### William Van Syckle, Appellant, *v.*Bertha Van Syckle, Respondent.

*Parent and child—right of father to custody.*

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special. Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 25th day of March, 1915, denying his motion for the custody of an infant child.

Per Curiam:

The father of a girl now five years of age obtained an absolute divorce, but the child was awarded to the mother, who, shortly upon remarriage, committed it to the maternal grandmother, to whom the court has now awarded it by amendment of the judgment. The father has some right to the custody of his child; the grandmother has none; the father is, like the grandmother, of good character; the father by reason of his income is better able to care for the child. There is no consideration related to the child’s welfare that requires that the grandmother be preferred. The order is reversed and the plaintiff’s motion granted, with a provision that the grandparents should not be denied reasonable opportunity to see the child. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order reversed'and plaintiff’s motion granted, with a provision that the grandparents should not be denied reasonable opportunity to see the child.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-030 March 02, 2004

NRC APPROVES POWER UPRATE FOR

KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a request by the Nuclear Management

Co. to increase the generating capacity of the Kewaunee nuclear power plant by six percent. The NRC

staff determined that the licensee could safely increase the power output of the reactor primarily

through minor component upgrades and evaluations demonstrating the plant can operate safely at the

increased power level within its existing design.

The power uprate at the plant, located near Green Bay, Wisconsin, increases the generating

capacity of the plant from approximately 557 to 590 megawatts electric. The licensee intends to

implement the uprate by the end of May.

The NRC previously published a notice about the power uprate application in the Federal

Register providing the public an opportunity to comment or request a hearing. No comments or

hearing requests were received by the NRC.

The NRC’s safety evaluation of the requested power uprate for the plant focused on several

areas, including nuclear steam supply systems, instrumentation and control systems, electrical systems,

accident evaluations, radiological consequences, operations, and other technical specification changes.

###
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29177]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 81

[EPA-R05-OAR-2009-0839; FRL-9489-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Indiana; Redesignation of the Indianapolis Area to Attainment of the 
1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of adverse comments, EPA is withdrawing the 
September 27, 2011 (76 FR 59512), direct final rule approving Indiana's 
request to redesignate the Indianapolis, Indiana nonattainment area 
(Hamilton, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, and Morgan Counties) to 
attainment for the 1997 annual National Ambient Air Quality Standard 
for fine particulate matter (PM2.5). In the direct final 
rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments were received by October 27, 
2011, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA has received 
adverse comments from three commenters and, therefore, is withdrawing 
the direct final rule. EPA will address the comments in a subsequent 
final action based upon the proposed action, also published on 
September 27, 2011 (76 FR 59599). EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 76 FR 59512 on September 27, 
2011, is withdrawn as of November 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental 
Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs 
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-1767, 
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.

40 CFR Part 81

    Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: November 2, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.776 published in the 
Federal Register on September 27, 2011 (76 FR 59512) on page 59526 is 
withdrawn as of November 14, 2011.

PART 81--[AMENDED]

    Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 81.315 published in the 
Federal Register on September 27, 2011 (76 FR 59512) on page 59526 is 
withdrawn as of November 14, 2011.

[FR Doc. 2011-29177 Filed 11-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0136 - Proposed Bulletin:  "Leakage From Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity"

Accession Number: ML032110411

Date Released: Friday, August 15, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML032110383 - SECY-03-0136 - Proposed Bulletin:  "Leakage From Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity" (3 page(s), 8/8/2003)
    - ML032110427 - SECY-03-0136Atch - NRC Bulletin 2003-0X:  Leakage From Reactor Pressure Vessel Lower Head Penetrations and Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity (10 page(s), 8/8/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### **CHAPTER 5—TRAINING**

Sec.
501.
Training generally.
502.
Required drills and field exercises.
503.
Participation in field exercises.
504.
National Guard schools and small arms competitions.
505.
Army and Air Force schools and field exercises.
506.
Assignment and detail of members of Regular Army or Regular Air Force for instruction of National Guard.
507.
Instruction in firing; supply of ammunition.
508.
Assistance for certain youth and charitable organizations.
509.
National Guard Youth Challenge Program of opportunities for civilian youth.
510.
Authorization for FireGuard Program.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title V, §515(b), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 249, added item 510.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–375, div. A, title V, §594(b)(2), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 1936, substituted "National Guard Youth Challenge" for "National Guard Challenge" in item 509.

**1997**—Pub. L. 105–85, div. A, title X, §1076(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 1914, added item 509.

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–337, div. A, title III, §385(b), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 2742, added item 508.
§ 165.14 Other Federal agency requests for investigations. ( a ) *Requests for investigations.* Any other Federal agency, including but not limited to the Department of Commerce or the United States International Trade Commission, may request an investigation under this part. CBP will initiate an investigation if the Federal agency has provided information that reasonably suggests that an importer has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion, unless the agency submits a request to withdraw to the designated email address specified by CBP or through any other method approved or designated by CBP.
( b ) *Contents of requests.* The following information must be included in the request for an investigation: ( 1 ) Name of importer against whom the allegation is brought;
( 2 ) Description of the covered merchandise;
( 3 ) Applicable AD/CVD orders;
( 4 ) Information that reasonably suggests that an importer has entered covered merchandise into the customs territory of the United States through evasion;
( 5 ) Identification of a point of contact at the agency; and
( 6 ) Notification of any knowledge of or reason to suspect that the covered merchandise poses any health or safety risk to U.S. consumers.
( c ) *Receipt of requests.* Requests for an investigation must be filed electronically via CBP's online e-Allegations system or through any other method approved or designated by CBP. The date of receipt is the date that CBP transmits notice of the assigned control number to the Federal agency that filed the request.
( d ) *Notice of release of information* — ( 1 ) *Public information.* CBP will treat the information required by paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section as public information.
( 2 ) *Business confidential treatment.* CBP will create a public summary of the information required by paragraphs (b)(4) and (6) of this section.
( e ) *Access to investigation.* The Federal agency is not a party to the investigation. Therefore, it will neither receive official notice of developments after CBP's receipt of the request for an investigation nor will it receive service of any documents filed by interested parties. Only the parties to the investigation will be entitled to notice and service, as well as the related rights to administrative review and judicial review.
[81 FR 56482, Aug. 22, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 19259, Mar. 18, 2024]
#### § 297.103 Designations of authority by system manager.

The responsible Office system manager having jurisdiction over a system of records may designate in writing an Office employee to evaluate and issue the Office's decision on Privacy Act matters relating to either internal, central, or Governmentwide systems of records.
#### PLAVEC et al., Appellants, v. WAGNER, Respondent.

(200 N. W. 823.)

(File No. 5699.

Opinion filed December 2, 1924.)

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Charles Mix County.

/. *L. Meighen,*of Yankton, for-Appellants.

*Geo. M. Caster,*of Lake Andes, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order of the circuit court .of Charles M;ix county. Notice of appeal was served and filed July 28, 1924. No other papers have been filed in said case.

• The appellants having failed to comply with rules 5, 6, 7, and 13 of this court relating to appeals, this appeal is deemed abandoned, and the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
### §306. Rules and regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to adopt rules and regulations governing the exercise of the discretion and authority conferred by this chapter, which rules and regulations shall constitute a part of any application or lease hereunder.

(May 21, 1930, ch. 307, §6, 46 Stat. 374.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, H. M. Busby, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Planet Polymer
Technologies, Inc.

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.       I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and we have:

         a)       designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report my conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on my evaluation; and

         c)       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.       I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a)       all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

         b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls.

Date: August 14, 2003

                                    /s/ H. M. Busby
                                    ___________________________
                                    H. M. Busby
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer