alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 353.211 Appeal rights. An individual who believes an agency has not complied with the provisions of law and this part relating to the employment or reemployment of the person by the agency may— ( a ) File a complaint with the Department of Labor, as noted in § 353.210, or
( b ) Appeal directly to MSPB if the individual chooses not to file a complaint with the Department of Labor, or is informed by either Labor or the Office of the Special Counsel that they will not pursue to the case. However, National Guard technicians do not have the right to appeal to MSPB a denial of reemployment rights by the Adjutant General. Technicians may file complaints with the appropriate district court in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 4323 (USERRA).
[60 FR 45652, Sept. 1, 1995, as amended at 64 FR 31487, June 11, 1999]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-158 November 18, 2005

 

NRC ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE ON POWER UPRATES 

TO MEET NOV. 29-30 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

A subcommittee of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor

Safeguards will hold a public meeting Nov. 29-30 in Rockville, Md., to review the application Entergy

filed to increase power output by approximately 20 percent at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power

plant. The subcommittee will hear from Entergy Nuclear representatives, NRC staff members and

interested members of the public.

The subcommittee will then formulate proposed positions or actions for deliberation by the full

committee. The Committee is an advisory board to the five-member Commission and independent

from the NRC staff.

Entergy submitted a request in September 2003 to increase, or "uprate," the maximum

authorized power level at the Vermont Yankee facility from 1,593 megawatts thermal to 1,912

megawatts thermal. This would represent an increase of approximately 100 megawatts electric.

The meeting, portions of which may be closed to discuss proprietary information, will begin at

8:30 a.m. both days and will run until the conclusion of business. The meeting will be held in Room T2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. A teleconference line

will be available. Members of the public needing more information or interested in offering oral or

written statements should contact Ralph Caruso, at 301-415-8065. Electronic recordings of this

meeting will be permitted. Signs will not be permitted in the meeting room.

###
§ 1315.20 Application of Section 1010 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001. Section 1010 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-398, 114 Stat. 1654), as amended by section 1007 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (Public Law 107-107, 115 Stat. 1012), requires an agency to pay an interest penalty whenever the agency makes an interim payment under a cost-reimbursement contract for services more than 30 days after the date the agency receives a proper invoice for payment from the contractor. This part implements Section 1010, as amended, and is applicable in the following manner: ( a ) This part shall apply to all interim payment requests that are due on or after December 15, 2000 under cost-reimbursement service contracts awarded before, on, or after December 15, 2000.
( b ) No interest penalty shall accrue under this part for any delay in payment that occurred prior to December 15, 2000.
( c ) Agencies are authorized to issue modifications to contracts, as necessary, to conform them to the provisions in this part implementing Section 1010, as amended.
[67 FR 79516, Dec. 30, 2002]
Return
      to Main Document




**Exhibit
      32.1**




Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
        connection with the Annual Report of Mexoro Minerals Limited (the "Company)
        on
        Form 10-KSB, for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the
        United States Securities and Exchange Commission, on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
        hereby certifies, pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        that
        to his knowledge:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Date: May
                30, 2006
              /s/Robert
                KnightRobert KnightChief
                Executive Officer
### §5152. Value of United States money holdings in international institutions

The Secretary of the Treasury shall maintain the value in terms of gold of the holdings of United States money of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, the International Development Association, and the Asian Development Bank to the extent provided in the articles of agreement of those institutions. Amounts necessary to maintain the value may be appropriated. Amounts appropriated under this section remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 992.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5152 | 31:449a. | Mar. 31, 1972, Pub. L. 92–268, §3, 86 Stat. 117. |

The word "money" is substituted for "dollars" for consistency in the revised title. The words "the International Monetary Fund" are omitted as obsolete because of section 9 of the Act of October 19, 1976 (Pub. L. 94–564, 90 Stat. 2661).
§ 2417.203 Filing requirements for litigants seeking documents or testimony. A requester must comply with the following requirements when filing a request or demand for official records and information or testimony under part 2417. Requesters should file a request before a demand. ( a ) The request or demand must be in writing and must be submitted to the FLRA's Office of the Solicitor.
( b ) The written request or demand must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved;
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show relevance;
( 3 ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs any need to maintain the confidentiality of the information and the burden on the FLRA to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than an employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is sought, the intended use of the testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require for each employee to prepare for testimony, to travel to the legal proceeding, and to attend the legal proceeding.
( c ) The Office of the Solicitor reserves the right to require additional information to complete the request, where appropriate.
( d ) Requesters should submit their request or demand at least 30 days before the date that records or testimony are required. Requests or demands submitted fewer than 30 days before records or testimony are required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request or demand and the reasons that would justify expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the FLRA to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with the request or demand.
( f ) The request or demand should state that the requester will provide a copy of the employee's statement at the expense of the requester and that the requester will permit the FLRA to have a representative present during the employee's testimony.
[74 FR 11640, Mar. 19, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 63362, Sept. 15, 2016]
#### § 330.214 Appeal rights.

An RPL registrant who believes the agency violated his or her reemployment rights under this subpart by employing another person who otherwise could not have been appointed properly may appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board under the Board's regulations in part 1200 of this chapter.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0137 - Request by Rhode Island to Relinquish Authority for Sealed Source and Device Evaluation and Approval

Accession Number: ML061590056

Date Released: Thursday, July 6, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML061580527 - SECY-06-0137 - Request by Rhode Island to Relinquish Authority for Sealed Source and Device Evaluation and Approval (8 page(s), 6/9/2006)
    - ML061590238 - 05/16/2006 Ltr from Governor Donald L. Carcieri Re Rhode Island's Request to Relinquish Sealed Source Device Authority and Approval. (1 page(s), 5/16/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-110 August 16, 2005

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM

EXTENDED OPERATION OF POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statement on the

proposed renewal of the operating licenses for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The report

contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would preclude license

renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The Point Beach plant is located on the western shore of Lake Michigan in Two Rivers, Wis.,

approximately 30 miles southeast of Green Bay. The current operating licenses expire on Oct. 5, 2010,

for Unit 1 and March 8, 2013, for Unit 2. Nuclear Management Company LLC, which operates the

plant for Wisconsin Electric Power Co., submitted an application for renewal of the licenses on

Feb. 25, 2004.

As part of its environmental review of the applications, the NRC held public meetings near the

plant to discuss the scope of the review and the draft version of the environmental impact statement.

Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and representatives of state and

federal agencies.

The Point Beach Final Environmental Impact Statement is available on the NRC’s Web site at

this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement23/index.html . Copies

are also available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room at One White Flint North, 11555

Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md, and the Lester Public Library, 1001 Adams Street, Two Rivers, Wis.

###
#### § 2610.304 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 2610.307.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent ,

v.

TIMOTHY WARREN STROBLE , Petitioner

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0 78 6 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR20 12

- 008428

- 001 DT The Honorable Ro sa Mroz , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Gerald R. Grant Counsel for Respondent
Timothy Warren Stroble, Tucson Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Judge Kenton D. Jones delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 4-4-2019S TATE v. STROBLE Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Timothy Warren Stroble seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conv iction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Ru le of Criminal Procedure 3 2.1. Thi s is petitioner’s first petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
#### §§ 2416.104-2416.109 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1368 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1368

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7554 Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, as the ``Norman D. 
                    Shumway Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1368

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 7554 Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, as the ``Norman D. 
                    Shumway Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7554 
Pacific Avenue in Stockton, California, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Norman D. Shumway Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Norman D. Shumway Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)  All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: March 23, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,057,447
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,138,082
<PP&E>                                          87,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,196,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,062,069
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,010,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,196,535
<SALES>                                            842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,155
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  524,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (488,237)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (488,237)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (488,237)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# 01/10/2007 - Ltr. T Neider re:  Transmittal Letter Certificate of Compliance No.1030 for the NUHOMS HD System.

Accession Number: ML070160058

Date Released: Thursday, January 11, 2007

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML070160064 - 01/10/2007 Ltr T. Neider re:  Certificate of Compliance No. 1030 for the NUHOMS HD System. (2 page(s), 1/10/2007)
    - ML070160072 - 01/10/2007 Certificate of Compliance No.1030 for NUHOMS HD System. (4 page(s), 1/10/2007)
    - ML070160083 - NUHOMS HD Horizontal Modular Storage, Technical Specifications,Certificate of Compliance No. 1030. (49 page(s), 1/10/2007)
    - ML070160089 - 01/10/2007 re: Safety Evaluation Report for Certificate of Compliance No. 1030 for NUHOMS HD System. (76 page(s), 1/10/2007)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer