alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §454. Consent of Congress to obstruction of waters by New York City

The consent of Congress is given to the city of New York, in the State of New York, to obstruct navigation of any river or other waterway which does not form a connecting link between other navigable waters of the United States, and lying wholly within the limits of said city, by closing all or any portion of the same or by building structures in or over the same when the said city shall be lawfully authorized to do so by the State of New York: Provided, however, That any such obstruction shall be unlawful unless the location and plans for the proposed work or works before the commencement thereof shall have been filed with and approved by the Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers; and when the plans for any such obstruction have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and by the Secretary of the Army it shall not be lawful to deviate from such plans either before or after the completion of such obstruction, unless the modification of such plans has previously been submitted to and received the approval of the Chief of Engineers and the Secretary of the Army: And provided further, That the city of New York shall be liable for any damage that may be inflicted upon private property by reason of any of the provisions of this section.

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved, and the United States shall incur no liability for the alteration, amendment, or repeal thereof to the city of New York, or to the owner or owners, or any other persons interested in any obstruction which shall have been constructed under its provisions.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 436, §§1, 2, 36 Stat. 866, 867; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act June 29, 1888, ch. 496, 25 Stat. 209, which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions, powers, and duties of Secretary of the Army and other offices and officers of Department of the Army under section 401 of this title to extent that they relate generally to location and clearances of bridges and causeways in navigable waters of United States transferred to and vested in Secretary of Transportation by Pub. L. 89–670, §6(g)(6)(A), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 941. Pub. L. 97–449 amended section 401 of this title to reflect transfer made by section 6(g)(6)(A) of Pub. L. 89–670, and repealed section 6(g)(6)(A).
EXHIBIT 13.2



SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V. for the period ended December 31, 2003,
Héctor Romero, Chief Financial Officer of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V.



Date: October 5, 2004



/s/ Héctor RomeroHéctor Romero Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and will be retained by Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §2270. Subsurface drain systems research and development

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary, acting through the Director of the Engineer Research and Development Center and, where appropriate, in consultation with other Federal agencies, shall carry out research and development activities relating to the use of subsurface drain systems as—

(1) a flood risk-reduction measure; or

(2) a coastal storm risk-reduction measure.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title II, §227, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2698.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of div. AA of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MothersWork, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dan W. Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| February 9, 2007          |

 

----
§ 2634.308 Filer's sources of compensation exceeding $5,000 in a year ( a ) *In general.* A public filer required to file a report as a New Entrant or a Nominee, pursuant to § 2634.201(b) or (c), must identify the filer's sources of compensation which exceed $5,000 in any one calendar year. This requirement includes compensation paid to another person, such as an employer, in exchange for the filer's services (e.g., payments to a law firm exceeding $5,000 in any one calendar year in exchange for the services of a partner or associate attorney). The filer must also briefly describe the nature of the duties performed or services rendered (e.g., “legal services”).
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) The name of a source of compensation may be excluded only if that information is specifically determined to be confidential as a result of a privileged relationship established by law and if the disclosure is specifically prohibited by law or regulation, by a rule of a professional licensing organization, or by a client agreement that at the time of engagement of the filer's services expressly provided that the client's name would not be disclosed publicly to any person. If the filer excludes the name of any source, the filer must indicate in the report that such information has been excluded, the number of sources excluded, and, if applicable, a citation to the statute, regulation, rule of professional conduct, or other authority pursuant to which disclosure of the information is specifically prohibited.
( 2 ) The report need not contain any information with respect to any person for whom services were provided by any firm or association of which the filer was a member, partner, or employee, unless the filer was directly involved in the provision of such services.
( 3 ) The President, the Vice President, and a candidate referred to in § 2634.201(d) are not required to report this information.
Example: A nominee who is a partner or employee of a law firm and who has worked on a matter involving a client from which the firm received over $5,000 in fees during a calendar year must report the name of the client only if the value of the services rendered by the nominee exceeded $5,000. The name of the client would not normally be considered confidential, unless the matter potentially involved an investigation or enforcement action involving the client by the government and the client's name has never been disclosed publicly in connection with the representation. As a result, the nominee must disclose the client's identity unless it is protected by statute, a court order, is under seal, or is considered confidential because: (1) The client is the subject of a non-public proceeding or investigation and the client has not been identified in a public filing, statement, appearance, or official report; (2) disclosure of the client's name is specifically prohibited by a rule of professional conduct that can be enforced by a professional licensing body; or (3) a privileged relationship was established by a written confidentiality agreement, entered into at the time that the filer's services were retained, that expressly prohibits disclosure of the client's identity.
§ 1653.16 Fees. The TSP record keeper will charge a participant a $600.00 legal process processing fee as follows: ( a ) Upon receipt of a complete legal process document (whether draft or final) and prior to reviewing order to determine whether it is a qualifying legal process, the fee will be deducted from his or her TSP account balance on a pro rata basis from the participant's traditional and Roth balances. The portion of the fee deducted from the traditional balance will be further pro rated between the tax-deferred balance and tax-exempt balance. The portion of the fee deducted from the Roth balance will be further pro rated between contributions in the Roth balance and earnings in the Roth balance. In addition, the entire fee will be distributed pro rata from all TSP core funds in which the participant's account is invested. All pro rated amounts will be based on the balances in each fund or source of contributions on the day the fee is deducted; and
( b ) The fee will be charged only once per legal process. However, it will not be refunded in the event that the court order is never determined to be a qualifying legal process.
[87 FR 31691, May 24, 2022]
#### Lee Card, appellant, v. Rosallie J. Mix et al., appellees.

Filed March 16, 1911.

No. 16,284.

Appeal: Questions oe Fact: Review. Where material and relevant deeds introduced in evidence by plaintiff in a suit to quiet title are omitted from bis bill of exceptions, the facts will not be considered cn appeal for tbe purpose of passing on bis assignments of error.

Appeal from the district court for Dawes county: William H. Westover, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Lee C^-rd, pro se.*

*A. W. Orites, contra.*

Rose, J.

This is a suit to quiet in plaintiff the title to two 80-acre tracts of land in Dawes county. The title to one tract was quieted in William M. Mix, defendant. The .undivided three-fourths interest in the other tract was quieted in plaintiff, and the undivided one-fourth in Rosallie J. Mix, defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

A determination of the questions presented by plaintiff in seeking a reversal would require an examination of the facts disclosed by the evidence. The bill of exceptions shows on its face that a number of important deeds introduced in evidence by plaintiff have been omitted there*742from. These missing documents were both material and relevant, and without an examination thereof it cannot be said they do not contain recitals justifying the findings of the trial court. They cannot be examined because they are not in the bill of exceptions. Since the evidence on which the trial court acted is not all here,' questions of fact cannot be examined for the purpose of passing on plaintiff’s assignments of error. *Nelson v. Jenkins,*42 Neb. *133; Alling v. Fisher,*55 Neb. 239; *Girard Trust Co. v. Paddock, ante,*p. 359.

Affirmed.

Letton, J., not sitting.
THE CI1Y OF AUGUSTA 

WILLIAM R. STOKES. MAYOR 

CITY COUNCIL 

JEFFREY M. BILODEAU CECIL E. MUNSON 

MICHAEL G. BYRON MARK S. O'BRIEN 

DALE McCORMICK PATRICK E. PARADIS 

DAREK M. GRANT DAVID M. ROLLINS 

Thursday, July 10,2014 

Michael F. Martin 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Martin: 

. . . 

WILLIAM R. BRIDGEO 

CITY MANAGER 

!,"· 

On behalf of the City of Augusta I am happy to support the recent Essential Air Service (EAS) 

proposal for the Augusta State Airport submitted by Cape Air. As you know, Cape Air began 

offering EAS at the Augusta State Airport in 2010. Since that time Cape Air has provided 

excellent customer service and delivered safe and reliable service to our community. 

.··-·--... 

The current proposal offered by Cape Air will continue to provide excellent air fares, a flexible 

schedule and destinations that will accommodate all travelers which the communities serviced by 

the Augusta State Airport have come to expect. Therefore, along with the airport manager and 

the Airport Board, the Augusta City Council and I strongly support that the USDOT award a four 

year contract for Essential Air Service by Cape Air at the Augusta State Airport. 

Please feel free to contact me at any if you have any questions or concerns regarding this 

matter. 

. . 

WRS/ljl 

Copy: Matt Nazar, Director of Development Services 

John Guimond, Airport Manager 

CITY CENTER· 16 CONY STREET· AUGUSTA. MAINE 04330-5298 TELEPHONE (207) 626-2300 · FAX (207) 620-8174
CUSIP
                               G2 COMPANIES, INC.


              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                                                               SEE REVERSE FOR
                                  COMMON STOCK               CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



                                    SPECIMAN


This
certifies
that







is the owner of


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF
                               G2 COMPANIES, INC.


(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation"),  transferable  on  the  books  of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney,  upon
surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the Certificate of Incorporation  and the Bylaws of the Corporation,  as amended
(copies of which are on file at the  office of the  Transfer  Agent),  to all of
which  the  holder  of this  Certificate  by  acceptance  hereof  assents.  This
Certificate  is not valid unless  countersigned  and  registered by the Transfer
Agent and  Registrar.  Witness  the  facsmile  seal of the  Corporation  and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


DATE:


                            [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]



                               Countersigned:
PRESIDENT                                    SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                             P.O. Box 701629
                                             Dallas, TX 75370
                                          By:


SECRETARY                                    ___________________________________
                                             TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
### §667. Annual reports

Said commission shall submit to the Chief of Engineers, for the information of the Secretary of the Army, on or before the 15th day of November of each year, a report of its labors and transactions, with plans for the construction, completion, and preservation of the public works outlined in this chapter, together with estimates of the cost thereof, stating what amounts can be profitably expended thereon each year. The Secretary of the Army shall thereupon submit same to Congress on or before the meeting thereof.

(Mar. 1, 1893, ch. 183, §7, 27 Stat. 508; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Transfer of Functions

California Debris Commission abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Army by Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1106, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4229, set out as a note under section 661 of this title.
### §743. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8512(a)(5), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4759

Section, acts June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §11, 36 Stat. 538; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158, related to lighthouse districts. Section 11 of act June 17, 1910, also enacted former section 717 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Prior provisions for the arrangement of the various lighthouse districts were made by R.S. §4670; act July 26, 1886, ch. 779, 24 Stat. 148, which were repealed by section 13 of act June 17, 1910.
### §1373. Public health agency coordination

The permitting agency under section 1342 of this title shall assist the applicant for a permit under such section in coordinating the requirements of this chapter with those of the appropriate public health agencies.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title V, §514, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 894.)
### §544a. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 650

Section, act June 20, 1938, ch. 535, §5, 52 Stat. 805, related to employment of retired civil service employees. See section 3323 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### § 1303.1 Purpose.

This part implements the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended, and prescribes the rules governing the public availability of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) records. The rules in this subpart should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-055 March 25, 2005

 

 NRC ISSUES ADVISORY TO NUCLEAR FACILITY OPERATORS 

 FOR PERSONNEL SECURITY CONTROLS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Friday it issued an Advisory March 23 to nuclear

facility operators emphasizing the need for a heightened level of awareness in ensuring the proper

identity of personnel even though they may be escorted while in the facility. In order to obtain

unescorted plant access, individuals are subject to an array of additional checks.

A recent incident of a foreign national using a false social security number and a false alien

registration card to obtain escorted access to work at a nuclear power plant identified the need for

additional checks on escorted personnel. Although the worker was escorted at all times while he was

at the nuclear power plant, the incident points to the need for heightened vigilance in checking the true

identity of such individuals.

The NRC urged licensees to check identities against a national security database. Licensees

were encouraged to report promptly the fraudulent use, or attempted use of false identification

information.

The NRC continues to work closely with other federal agencies to address this issue and will

advise its licensees of any further developments.

###
### §2503. Prohibition

After 6 months after November 18, 1988, no public vessel shall dispose of potentially infectious medical waste into ocean waters unless—

(1)(A) the health or safety of individuals on board the vessel is threatened; or

(B) during time of war or a declared national emergency;

(2) the waste is disposed of beyond 50 nautical miles from the nearest land; and

(3)(A) in the case of a public vessel which is not a submersible, the waste is sterilized, properly packaged, and sufficiently weighted to prevent the waste from coming ashore after disposal; and

(B) in the case of a public vessel which is a submersible, the waste is properly packaged and sufficiently weighted to prevent the waste from coming ashore after disposal.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title III, §3104, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4152.)
### §467b. Investigation reports to Governors

As soon as practicable after inspection of a dam, the Secretary shall notify the Governor of the State in which such dam is located the results of such investigation. In any case in which any hazardous conditions are found during an inspection, upon request by the owner, the Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may perform detailed engineering studies to determine the structural integrity of the dam, subject to reimbursement of such expense by the owner of such dam. The Secretary shall immediately notify the Governor of any hazardous conditions found during an inspection. The Secretary shall provide advice to the Governor, upon request, relating to timely remedial measures necessary to mitigate or obviate any hazardous conditions found during an inspection.

(Pub. L. 92–367, §4, formerly §3, Aug. 8, 1972, 86 Stat. 507; Pub. L. 99–662, title XII, §1204, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4263; renumbered §4 and amended Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(3), (6), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3685, 3687.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 4 of Pub. L. 92–367 was renumbered section 5 and is classified to section 467c of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–303 inserted section catchline.

1986—Pub. L. 99–662 inserted "In any case in which any hazardous conditions are found during an inspection, upon request by the owner, the Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, may perform detailed engineering studies to determine the structural integrity of the dam, subject to reimbursement of such expense by the owner of such dam."
§ 316.912 Termination. ( a ) Any appointment made under the authority in this subpart expires on the not-to-exceed date of that appointment unless the agency extends the appointment prior to expiration.
( b ) An agency must terminate any student without regard to any provision of 5 U.S.C. chapter 35 or 75, who: ( 1 ) Does not maintain eligibility in accordance with §§ 316.902 and 316.910; or
( 2 ) Is not converted in accordance with § 316.910.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0036 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences For Fiscal Year 2002

Accession Number: ML030370209

Date Released: Wednesday, April 23, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030370124 - SECY-03-0036 - Report to Congress on Abnormal Occurrences for Fiscal Year 2002 (2 page(s), 2/7/2003)
    - ML030370154 - SECY-03-0036-Attachment 1-Draft "Report  To Congress on Abnormal Occurrences, Fiscal Year 2002" (36 page(s), 2/6/2003)
    - ML030370174 - SECY-03-0036-Attachments 2 and 3- Draft Ltrs to Congress - FY02 (2 page(s), 2/6/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer