alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-003                                                February 17, 2006CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416       E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SENDS AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW SECURITY AT FLORIDA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AND ISSUES CONFIRMATORY ACTION LETTER

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is sending an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) toreview security issues at the Turkey Point nuclear power plant, operated by Florida Power & LightCompany near Florida City, about 30 miles southeast of Miami.

An AIT is formed to review the circumstances surrounding more significant issues at NRC- licensed facilities.  The NRC team inspection includes specialists from the agency’s Region IIoffice in Atlanta and from its headquarters in Rockville, Md.  The team is expected to spend about oneweek at the site before returning to the regional office where the information they have gathered willbe analyzed and evaluated.

In addition to the AIT, the NRC is issuing a Confirmatory Action Letter to FP&L to confirmthat the company has taken or plans to take appropriate corrective actions and has initiated its owninvestigation of the issues.

“This inspection team will comprehensively assess the Turkey Point security issues to ensurethat the security program is being effectively implemented,” said NRC Region II AdministratorWilliam Travers.

Details of NRC inspections of security at the nation’s nuclear power plants are not publiclyavailable.  The NRC has determined that certain security information should not be made public if itcould reasonably be useful to an adversary.

###
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Paul Roy,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002* ,
      that,
      to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the*Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934*;
                and





2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                for the periods presented.

















/s/
      Jean
      Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean
      Paul
      Roy


President
      and Chief Executive Officer




May
      14,
      2007
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-033 September 9, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC AUTHORIZES RESTART OF WATERFORD NUCLEAR PLANT

Following a comprehensive assessment, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has

authorized the restart of the Waterford nuclear plant near Taft, La. Workers are performing

maintenance unrelated to the hurricane prior to initiating procedures leading to restart of the

reactor.

The plant shut down as a precautionary measure on Aug. 28 when a warning for

Hurricane Katrina was issued for St. Charles Parish, La., where the plant is located. The plant

was essentially undamaged by the storm, although it did lose offsite power and some

communications systems were affected.

NRC performed a readiness assessment to verify that the plant, its staff and onsite

emergency preparedness are ready to support restart. NRC worked with other Federal agencies in

their evaluation of the readiness of offsite emergency preparedness and response capabilities to

support operation of the plant. Conditions are sufficiently stable to ensure that the plant’s

emergency preparedness plans and procedures could be implemented should they be needed. 

“The NRC has performed a comprehensive review of the plant’s readiness for restart,”

NRC Chairman Nils Diaz said. “We are confident the plant can be operated safely.” Once

operational, Waterford will supply electricity to support recovery of the regional infrastructure. 

 

NRC and its licensees took aggressive and appropriate steps to prepare for Hurricane

Katrina. NRC coordinated extensively with other Federal, State and local emergency response

organizations before, during, and after the Katrina.

From its inception, NRC headquarters and regional operations centers carefully tracked

the status of Hurricane Katrina in the Atlantic Ocean and verified licensee preparedness and

confirmed communications capability amongst emergency response organizations. NRC

coordinated with its regional offices, other Federal agencies, including the Federal Emergency

Management Agency, and State and local organizations and maintained close communications
-2-

with its licensees throughout the passage of the storm. NRC also applied lessons learned from

previous hurricanes and updated its communication and coordination protocols for determining

offsite emergency preparedness for a natural disaster in advance of Hurricane Katrina. 

###
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Ambient Corporation on Form S-8 (No. 333-112569) of our report
dated March 25, 2003 relating to the financial statements which appear in
Ambient Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
31, 2003.




                        /S/ BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.

                        CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (ISRAEL)
                        A MEMBER OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU


Tel Aviv, Israel
March 30, 2004
§ 2423.27 Summary judgment motions. ( a ) *Motions.* Any party may move for a summary judgment in its favor on any of the issues pleaded. Unless otherwise approved by the Administrative Law Judge, such motion shall be made no later than 10 days prior to the hearing. The motion shall demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Such motions shall be supported by documents, affidavits, applicable precedent, or other appropriate materials.
( b ) *Responses.* Responses must be filed within 5 days after the date of service of the motion. Responses may not rest upon mere allegations or denials but must show, by documents, affidavits, applicable precedent, or other appropriate materials, that there is a genuine issue to be determined at the hearing.
( c ) *Decision.* If all issues are decided by summary judgment, no hearing will be held and the Administrative Law Judge shall prepare a decision in accordance with § 2423.34. If summary judgment is denied, or if partial summary judgment is granted, the Administrative Law Judge shall issue an opinion and order, subject to interlocutory appeal as provided in § 2423.31(c) of this subchapter, and the hearing shall proceed as necessary.
### §1427. Civil actions

#### (a) Equitable relief

Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any person may commence a civil action for equitable relief on that person's behalf in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia—

(1) against any person who is alleged to be in violation of any provision of this chapter or any condition of a license or permit issued under this subchapter; or

(2) against the Administrator when there is alleged a failure of the Administrator to perform any act or duty under this chapter which is not discretionary,

if the person bringing the action has a valid legal interest which is or may be adversely affected by such alleged violation or failure to perform. In suits brought under this subsection, the district court shall have jurisdiction, without regard to the amount in controversy or the citizenship of the parties, to enforce the provisions of this chapter, or any term, condition, or restriction of a license or permit issued under this subchapter, or to order the Administrator to perform such act or duty.

#### (b) Notice

No civil action may be commenced—

(1) under subsection (a)(1) of this section—

(A) prior to 60 days after the plaintiff has given notice of the alleged violation to the Administrator and to any alleged violator; or

(B) if the Administrator or the Attorney General has commenced and is diligently prosecuting a civil or criminal action with respect to the alleged violation in a court of the United States; except that in any such civil action, any person having a valid legal interest which is or may be adversely affected by the alleged violation may intervene; or

(2) under subsection (a)(2) of this section, prior to 60 days after the plaintiff has given notice of such action to the Administrator.

Notice under this subsection shall be given in such a manner as the Administrator shall prescribe by regulation.

#### (c) Costs and fees

The court, in issuing any final order in any action brought under subsection (a) of this section, may award costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney and expert witness fees, to any party whenever the court determines that such an award is appropriate.

#### (d) Relationship to other law

Nothing in this section shall restrict the rights which any person or class of persons may have under other law to seek enforcement or to seek any other relief. All vessel safety and environmental requirements of or under this chapter shall be in addition to other requirements of law.

(Pub. L. 96–283, title I, §117, June 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 573.)
§ 1600.13 Effect of transfer to FERS. ( a ) If an employee appointed to a position covered by CSRS elects to transfer to FERS, the employee may make a contribution election at any time.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) If the employee had elected to make TSP contributions while covered by CSRS, the election continues to be valid until the employee makes a new valid election.
( d ) Agency automatic (1%) contributions for all employees covered under this section and, if applicable, agency matching contributions attributable to employee contributions must begin the same pay period that the transfer to FERS becomes effective.
[70 FR 32207, June 1, 2005. Redesignated at 26422, May 4, 2012, as amended at 87 FR 31672, May 24, 2022]
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

I, Christopher H. Pickwoad, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 20-F of Novamerican Steel Inc.;

2.                 Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.                 The company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.                 The company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

| Date: February 22, 2006 |                          |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                         | /s/ *Christopher H. Pickwoad* |
|                         | Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

----
§ 1201.113 Finality of decision. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72962 , Sept. 9, 2024.
The initial decision of the judge will become the Board's final decision 35 days after issuance. Initial decisions are not precedential. ( a ) *Exceptions.* The initial decision will not become the Board's final decision if within the time limit for filing specified in 1201.114 of this part, any party files a petition for review or, if no petition for review is filed, files a request that the initial decision be vacated for the purpose of accepting a settlement agreement into the record.
( b ) *Petition for review denied.* If the Board denies all petitions for review, the initial decision will become final when the Board issues its last decision denying a petition for review.
( c ) *Petition for review granted or case reopened.* If the Board grants a petition for review or a cross petition for review, or reopens or dismisses a case, the decision of the Board is final if it disposes of the entire action.
( d ) *Extensions.* The Board may extend the time limit for filing a petition for good cause shown as specified in § 1201.114 of this part.
( e ) *Exhaustion.* Administrative remedies are exhausted when a decision becomes final in accordance with this section.
( f ) When the Board, by final decision or order, finds there is reason to believe a current Federal employee may have committed a prohibited personnel practice described at 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8) or 2302(b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D), the Board will refer the matter to the Special Counsel to investigate and take appropriate action under 5 U.S.C. 1215.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 62 FR 59992, Nov. 6, 1997; 77 FR 62368, Oct. 12, 2012; 78 FR 39545, July 2, 2013]
### §§301 to 303. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(a), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section 301, R.S. §4233; Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, 26 Stat. 320; Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 645; Feb. 19, 1895, ch. 102, §1, 28 Stat. 672; June 7, 1897, ch. 4, 30 Stat. 96; May 21, 1948, ch. 328, §4, 62 Stat. 250; Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 386, §2, 67 Stat. 497, made provision for the adoption of rules for navigation on the Red River of the North and rivers emptying into the Gulf of Mexico and tributaries.

Section 302, R.S. §4233; Feb. 19, 1895, ch. 102, §1, 28 Stat. 672; Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1457, §10, 33 Stat. 1032; May 21, 1948, ch. 328, §4, 62 Stat. 250, defined the terms "steam vessel", "under way", "visible", and "distinct blast".

Section 303, act Feb. 19, 1895, ch. 102, §3, 28 Stat. 672, set penalties for violation by vessels. See section 2072 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 24, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
June 24, 2015 

Mr. Julio Quintana Jr. 

8 Red Oak Court 

Baiting Hollow, NY 11933 

Dear Mr. Quintana: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 30, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0829), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
1st Amendment to Directors Incentive Plan



 



Exhibit 10.36


FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION

1996 DIRECTORS INCENTIVE PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of September 9, 2002)






     WHEREAS, Ameritrade Holding Corporation (the “Company”) maintains
Ameritrade Holding Corporation 1996 Directors Incentive Plan (As Amended and
Restated Effective as of September 9, 2002) (the “Plan”);





     WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13 of the Plan, the Board
of Directors of the Company has the authority to amend the Plan, subject to
certain restrictions; and





     WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable; and





     NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the Plan be, and its hereby is,
amended effective as of September 9, 2002, in the following particulars:





	     1.		 	By substituting the following for the last sentence of subsection 9.1
of the Plan:
	 
	“Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) the Board, in its sole discretion, may
determine that an Award Year of less than 12 months is appropriate, in which
case, the amount of the Retainer and any other amounts payable to a
Non-Employee Director for such Award Year to which any provision of the Plan
applies shall be calculated and shall be payable as determined by the Board in
its sole discretion, and (ii) in no event shall the Retainer for the Award Year
commencing on September 28, 2002 (the ‘2003 Award Year’) be payable prior to
October 11, 2002.”


	 
	     2.		 	By adding the following as the last sentence of subsection 9.2 of the
Plan:

	 
	“Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall any Eligible Cash Payments
for the 2003 Award Year be payable prior to October 11, 2002.”


	 
	     3.		 	By substituting the following for paragraph 9.4(b) of the Plan:

	 
	     “(b)		 	 the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock as of the date on
which such Eligible Cash Payments would otherwise have been payable
to the Non-Employee Director; provided, however, that in the case of
Eligible Cash Payments which were payable (i) for the 2003 Award
Year to individuals who were Non-Employee Directors as of the first
day of the 2003 Award Year and (ii) on or prior to October 11, 2002,
Fair Market Value under this paragraph (b) shall be determined as of
October 1, 2002.”
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-117 August 26, 2005

NRC ISSUES SUPPLEMENTAL SAFETY EVALUATION FOR

 CLINTON EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has updated its draft safety evaluation report (SER)

for an Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Clinton site, which is located about six miles east of Clinton, Ill.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The

Clinton application was filed Sept. 25, 2003, by Exelon Generation Company, LLC. If approved, the

permit would give Exelon up to 20 years to decide whether to build one or more nuclear plants on the

site and to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

The SER update summarizes the NRC staff's technical evaluation of the Clinton site’s

suitability in terms of seismology and geology. The original draft SER, issued in February, did not

include these areas because Exelon used a new method for determining the site’s largest earthquake the

plant could withstand and still shut down safely. The staff has completed reviewing the methodology

and will finish evaluating the site once Exelon submits additional information.

Along with completing the SER, the staff must complete an Environmental Impact Statement,

the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards must issue a report on the ESP application, and the

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel must conclude its hearing on the matter before the

Commission can reach a final decision on issuing the ESP. The NRC expects to finish this process by

early 2007.

Exelon will have 14 days to review the SER supplement for proprietary information. The

report will then be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room,

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. It will also be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/esp/clinton.html . In addition, the Vespasian Warner Public

Library in Clinton has agreed to make the supplement available for public inspection.

###
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS14840 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.