alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

187 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Martin E. Welch, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    MARTIN E. WELCH III Martin E. Welch III Chief Financial Officer


February 26, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual performance plan**
 
2000 | 2001 | 2002
 
SuDoc:E 1.35:
Item Number:0419-T-14
CGP systemNumber:000527854
 
November 7, 2017
§ 1206.7 Transcripts, recordings, or minutes of open and closed meetings; public availability; retention. ( a ) *Closed meetings.* ( 1 ) For every meeting, or portion thereof, closed pursuant to this part the presiding officer shall prepare a statement setting forth the time and place of the meeting and the persons present, which statement shall be retained by the Board. For each such meeting, or portion thereof, the Board shall maintain a copy of the General Counsel's certification under § 1206.6(b) of this part, a statement from the presiding official specifying the time and place of the meeting and naming the persons present, a record (which may be part of the transcript) of all votes and all documents considered at the meeting, and a complete transcript or electronic recording of the proceedings, except that for meetings or portions of meetings closed pursuant to section (10) of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), the Board may maintain either a transcript, electronic recording, or a set of minutes. In lieu of a transcript or electronic recording, a set of minutes shall fully and accurately summarize any action taken, the reasons therefore and views thereon, documents considered and the members' vote on each roll call vote, if any.
( 2 ) The Board shall make promptly available to the public copies of transcripts, recordings, or minutes maintained as provided in accordance with this paragraph (a), except to the extent the items therein contain information which the Board determines may be withheld pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c). Copies of transcripts or minutes, or transcriptions of electronic recordings including the identification of speakers, shall to the extent determined to be publicly available, be furnished to any person, subject to the payment of duplication costs or the actual cost of transcription.
( 3 ) The Board shall maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete copy of the minutes, or a complete electronic recording of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, for a period of at least two (2) years after such meeting or until one (1) year after the conclusion of any Board proceeding with respect to which the meeting or portion was held whichever occurs later.
( b ) *Open meetings.* Transcripts or other records will be made of all open meetings of the Board. Those records will be made available upon request at a fee representing the Board's actual cost of making them available.
[76 FR 10755, Feb. 28, 2011]
Merrimack,

Dec., 1898.

#### Harvey *v.*Morse.

In an action of trover by one having a special property in the goods converted, the measure of damages is the value of his interest at the date of conversion.

Trover, for railway ties. The plaintiff made a contract with D. & E., whereby he was to cut the ties from timber standing upon their land, and pay them for the ties and for drawing to the railroad, all that he should receive for them over ten cents each. Under the contract the plaintiff employed and paid choppers whs cut the ties, which D. & E. drew out and piled on land of the railroad. While the plaintiff was negotiating a sale of the ties to the railroad, they were attached and sold, upon a writ against D. & E., by the defendant, a deputy sheriff.

Subject to the plaintiff’s exception, the court refused to instruct the jury that the measure of his damages was the value of the ties at the date of the conversion, and instructed them that the measure of his damages was the amount which he was entitled to retain upon a sale of the ties, or ten cents for each tie, with interest. The jury returned a verdict accordingly.

*Napoleon B. Hale*and *Albín, Martin Howe,*for the plaintiff

*Burnham,, Brown Warren,*for the defendant.

Pike, J.

The contract between D. & E. and the plaintiff did not constitute a sale of the ties. *Rowell*v. *Claggett, ante, p.*201. It was simply an agreement whereby the plaintiff' obtained a special property in them, for cutting them and negotiating their sale. The value of this special property was fixed by the agreement at ten cents a tie. In no event was the plaintiff' to receive more than this from the contract. The general property, retained by D. & E., was of an uncertain value, and depended upon the sale the plaintiff might be able to effect. The proceeds of the sale, less the value of the plaintiff’s interest, was the share which D. & E. had in the transaction.

When the attachment was made the plaintiff’s part of the contract was practically performed, although the sale was not complete. The general property in the ties remained in H. & E., and was subject to attachment for their debts. The plaintiff’s damages -were only the value of his special property, and this was what the jury were instructed to allow him.

*.'Exception overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §393. Amendments of complaint and adjournments

It shall be lawful for the court to allow the United States attorney to amend his statement of complaint at any stage of the proceedings, before verdict, if, in the opinion of the court, such amendment will work no injustice to the accused; and if it appears to the court that the accused is unprepared to meet the charge as amended, and that an adjournment of the cause will promote the ends of justice, such adjournment shall be made, until a further day, to be fixed by the court.

(R.S. §4302; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4302 derived from act June 11, 1864, ch. 121, §6, 13 Stat. 125.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorney" for "district attorney". See section 541 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Historical and Revision Notes set out thereunder.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-050 September 21, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC SEEKING PUBLIC COMMENT ON PROPOSED RELEASE OF LAND 

FROM GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public on Wednesday, September 28,

in Ontario, N.Y., to obtain comments on a proposal to release part of the R.E. Ginna nuclear power

plant for unrestricted use. 

The meeting will be held from 6 to 8 p.m. at the R.E. Ginna Training Center, 1517 Lake

Ontario Road in Ontario. 

Constellation Nuclear, which operates Ginna, sent the NRC a letter on May 20 requesting the

release of a part of the site for unrestricted use. (The document is available from the NRC’s electronic

database at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html. The accession number is

ML051530448.) Before approving the proposed partial site release, the NRC must determine that the

company has met the criteria for such a release. The 15-acre tract of land consists of two adjacent

parcels on the western edge of the site boundary. It’s entirely outside of the exclusion area. 

Documents related to this action, including the application and supporting documentation, are

accessible electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System’s Public

Electronic Reading Room at the NRC’s web site: www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Those

without access to ADAMS should contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) staff at 800/397-

4209. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee. 

To expedite the required visitor processing and to assure adequate accommodations,

prospective attendees are encouraged to contact Shannine DiMora at 315/524-6935 prior to the

meeting. 

###
### §§42c, 42d. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(12), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1726

Section 42c, Pub. L. 85–778, §1, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 934; H. Res. No. 532, Eighty-eighth Congress, Oct. 2, 1963, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 88–454, §103, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 550; H. Res. No. 1003, Ninetieth Congress, Dec. 14, 1967, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 90–392, title I, July 9, 1968, 82 Stat. 318, related to airmail and special delivery stamps for House Members and standing committees.

Section 42d, Pub. L. 85–778, §2, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 934; H. Res. No. 532, Eighty-eighth Congress, Oct. 2, 1963, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 88–454, §103, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 550; H. Res. No. 1003, Ninetieth Congress, Dec. 14, 1967, enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 90–392, title I, July 9, 1968, 82 Stat. 318, related to airmail and special delivery stamps for House Speaker, leaders, whips, and officers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Existing Entitlements

Pub. L. 85–778, §§3, 4, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 934, which provided that Members, committees, and officers of the House of Representatives retained their existing entitlements to airmail and special delivery postage stamps until June 30, 1959, and thereafter the airmail and special delivery stamps made available under former sections 42c and 42d of this title were to be in lieu of any made available under any other law, were repealed by Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §203(12), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1726.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-075 May 3, 2005

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM

EXTENDED OPERATION OF COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its final environmental impact statement on the

proposed renewal of the operating licenses for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The

report contains the NRC’s finding that there are no environmental impacts that would preclude license

renewal for an additional 20 years of operation.

The Cook plant is located in Berrien County, about 55 miles east of Chicago, Ill. The current

operating licenses expire on October 25, 2014, for Unit 1 and December 23, 2017, for Unit 2. Indiana

Michigan Power Co. Inc. (I&M), the licensee, submitted an application for renewal of both licenses on

Oct. 31, 2003. 

As part of its environmental review of the application, the NRC held public meetings near the

plant to discuss the scope of the review and the draft version of the environmental impact statement.

Comments were received from members of the public, local officials and representatives of state and

federal agencies.

The Donald C. Cook Final Environmental Impact Statement is available on the NRC’s Web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1437/supplement20/index.html . 

Copies are also available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room at One White Flint

North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.; the Bridgman Public Library, 4460 Lake Street,

Bridgman, Mich. and the Maud Preston Palenske Memorial Library, 500 Market Street, St. Joseph,

Mich.

###
§ 2634.1001 Overview. ( a ) *Scope.* 26 U.S.C. 1043 and the rules of this subpart allow an eligible person to defer paying capital gains tax on property sold to comply with conflict of interest requirements. To defer the gains, an eligible person must obtain a Certificate of Divestiture from the Director of the Office of Government Ethics before selling the property. This subpart describes the circumstances when an eligible person may obtain a Certificate of Divestiture and establishes the procedure that the Office of Government Ethics uses to issue Certificates of Divestiture.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of section 1043 and this subpart is to minimize the burden that would result from paying capital gains tax on the sale of assets to comply with conflict of interest requirements. Minimizing this burden aids in attracting and retaining highly qualified personnel in the executive branch and ensures the confidence of the public in the integrity of Government officials and decision-making processes.
NRC NEWS

 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-027 April 7, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: opa2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH PROGRESS ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT BRUNSWICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Progress Energy officials on

Monday, April 14, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Brunswick nuclear power plant near Southport, North Carolina.

The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. in the Brunswick Media Center, 8520 River Road SE in

Southport. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the

conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Progress Energy addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter indicates that, overall,

Brunswick operated safely and that plant performance was at a level requiring no additional NRC

inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is available from Region II Public

Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/bru_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will also

conduct inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders. 

Current performance indicators for the Brunswick plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRU1/bru1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BRU2/bru2_chart.html

###
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2010



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/S/    GREGORY E.
LICHTWARDT                                   
|Gregory E. Lichtwardt                                          
|Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
### §579b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 113–121, title VI, §6001, June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1345; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1301(g), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1690, consisted of subsecs. (a) to (f) relating to deauthorization of inactive projects authorized for construction before Nov. 8, 2007. Subsecs. (a) and (c) to (f) were repealed by Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1301(g), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1690. Subsec. (b) of section 6001 of Pub. L. 113–121 amended section 579a of this title.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Vanquish Worldwide, LLC ) ) ) Under Contract No. W91B4N-11-D-7018 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59175, 59250, 59268 59269,59270,59492

Charles R. Lucy, Esq.

Holland & Hart, LLP Colorado Springs, CO Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Nancy J. Lewis, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 6 February 2015

# 4~,,v.~-- MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59175, 59250, 59268, 59269, 59270, 59492, Appeals ofVanquish Worldwide, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
### §45. Swan Creek, Toledo, Ohio

Swan Creek, a stream lying within the limits of the city of Toledo, State of Ohio, is declared to be not a navigable waterway of the United States within the meaning of the laws enacted by Congress for the preservation and protection of such waterways, and the consent of Congress is given for the filling in of said creek by the local authorities.

(Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 142, §13, 38 Stat. 1055.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act Mar. 4, 1915, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1915".
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-136 October 4, 2005

NRC ESTABLISHES WEB PAGE FOR INFORMATION ON

SPENT FUEL POOL ISSUES AT INDIAN POINT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has established a page on the agency’s Web site to

consolidate information on the recently discovered leakage from the spent nuclear fuel pool at Indian

Point Unit 2 nuclear power plant. The leakage at the Buchanan, N.Y., facility is very small, is being

monitored and does not pose any health or safety concern for members of the public or plant workers.

The page includes updates on the NRC’s special inspection at the site, which among other

things will review the company’s evaluation of the pool structure, evaluate remedial actions on the part

of the company, and assess any potential environmental impact of the leakage. The inspection team

will issue a report documenting its findings within 45 days of the completion of the inspection. 

The page also provides general information concerning the Indian Point spent fuel pool leak,

and will be updated with additional information, such as public meeting details, correspondence and

press releases, as needed. The page’s address on the NRC web site is: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/indian-point-issues.html .

###
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Planet Polymer Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that base don their knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the period covered in the Report.

/s/ H. M. Busby
--------------------------------------------
H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer

/s/ H. M. Busby
--------------------------------------------
H. M. Busby, Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2003

                                        1
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-021-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)