alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w49



 







RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003




Exhibit 10.49




Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.

474 Old Orchard Circle

Millersville, MD 21108 USA


Dear Thomas:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: June 12, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 50,000

Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting



16,666 on 06/12/2004

16,667 on 06/12/2005

16,667 on 06/12/2006


By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
	 	Date: ________________
	                     Thomas M. Brandt, Jr.
	 	 







Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
### §576b. Lease authority

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may lease space available in buildings for which funding for construction or purchase was provided from the revolving fund established by the 1st section of the Civil Functions Appropriations Act, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 576; 67 Stat. 199), under such terms and conditions as are acceptable to the Secretary. The proceeds from such leases shall be credited to the revolving fund for the purposes set forth in such Act.

(Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §213, Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Civil Functions Appropriations Act, 1954, referred to in text, is act July 27, 1953, ch. 245, 67 Stat. 197. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
§ 370.109 Agency plans. Before detailing agency employees or receiving private sector employees under this part, an agency must establish an Information Technology Exchange Program Plan. The plan must include, but is not limited to, the following elements: ( a ) Designation of the agency officials with authority to review and approve details;
( b ) Estimated number of candidates needed, both private sector and Federal employees, to address IT workforce needs within the agency;
( c ) Criteria for the selection of agency employees for a detail under this part. At a minimum, each agency must: ( 1 ) Announce the detail, including eligibility requirements, to all eligible employees;
( 2 ) Provide for employee nomination by their organization or self-nomination, to include endorsement by their respective supervisor;
( 3 ) Forward nominations to designated agency reviewing and approving official for final selection.
( 4 ) Consider: ( i ) The extent to which the employee's current competencies and skills are being utilized in the agency;
( ii ) The employee's capability to improve, enhance, or learn skills and acquire competencies needed in the agency; and
( iii ) The benefits to the agency which would result from selecting the employee for detail.
( d ) Return rights and continuing service requirements for Federal employees returning from a detail; and
( e ) Documentation and recordkeeping requirements sufficient to allow reconstruction of each action taken under this part to meet agency reporting requirements under § 370.108(a) and (b).
#### William Lynch, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Central Brewing Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Dan W. Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| August 9, 2005       |

 

----
### §561a. Contributions from local interests; reduction to meet lowered cost

When the authorization of a project of river and harbor improvement requires that local interests shall contribute a specific sum of money toward its cost, the Secretary of the Army, upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, may reduce the sum to be contributed to an amount which shall be in the same ratio to the amount of the required contribution as the actual cost of the work to which said contribution is applicable bears to its original estimated cost as set forth in the project document.

(Mar. 3, 1933, ch. 216, 47 Stat. 1545; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

A prior provision that the reduction authorized by this section was not to apply to contributions made prior to Mar. 3, 1933, was omitted as obsolete.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
### §1268a. Great Lakes restoration activities report

(a) For purposes of this section the following definitions apply:

(1) The terms "Great Lakes" and "Great Lakes State" have the same meanings as such terms have in section 1962d–22 of title 42.

(2) The term "Great Lakes restoration activities" means any Federal or State activity primarily or entirely within the Great Lakes watershed that seeks to improve the overall health of the Great Lakes ecosystem.

(b) Hereafter, not later than 45 days after submission of the budget of the President to Congress, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in coordination with the Governor of each Great Lakes State and the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force, shall submit to the appropriate authorizing and appropriating committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives a financial report, certified by the Secretary of each agency that has budget authority for Great Lakes restoration activities, containing—

(1) an interagency budget crosscut report that—

(A) displays the budget proposed, including any planned interagency or intra-agency transfer, for each of the Federal agencies that carries out Great Lakes restoration activities in the upcoming fiscal year, separately reporting the amount of funding to be provided under existing laws pertaining to the Great Lakes ecosystem; and

(B) identifies all expenditures in each of the 5 prior fiscal years by the Federal Government and State governments for Great Lakes restoration activities;

(2) a detailed accounting of all funds received and obligated by all Federal agencies and, to the extent available, State agencies using Federal funds, for Great Lakes restoration activities during the current and previous fiscal years;

(3) a budget for the proposed projects (including a description of the project, authorization level, and project status) to be carried out in the upcoming fiscal year with the Federal portion of funds for activities; and

(4) a listing of all projects to be undertaken in the upcoming fiscal year with the Federal portion of funds for activities.

(Pub. L. 113–76, div. E, title VII, §738, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 238.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, 2014, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, and not as part of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 332.404 Order of selection from certificates. An appointing officer, with sole regard to merit and fitness, shall select an eligible for: ( a ) The first vacancy from the highest three eligibles on the certificate who are available for appointment; and
( b ) The second and each succeding vacancy from the highest three eligibles on the certificate who are unselected and available for appointment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BROCK
INTERNATIONAL'S FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                     5,175
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,231<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,826
<PP&E>                                           2,048<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,991
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,503
<SALES>                                          2,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,998
<CGS>                                              354
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (988)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
<FN>
<F1>A/R AND PPE ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1038 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NE-31-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Conduct record 

search 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 5,000 $425,000.00

Disassemble/reasse

mble reduction 

gearbox

10.0 $ 850.00 $ 850.00 10 $8,500.00

Replace sun and 

planetary gears

16.0 $1,360.0

0

$14,500 $15,860.00 40 $634,400.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,067,900

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
            AND COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                        -----------------------------------------------------
                            1995       1996      1997       1998      1999
                         ---------  ---------  ---------  --------   -------
<S>                      <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Interest expense......     $3,039     $ 2,771   $ 5,900   $14,062    $14,888

Estimated interest
  portion of rent
  expense.............        335         381       468       694        913
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------

Fixed charges.........     $3,374     $ 3,152   $ 6,368   $14,756    $15,801
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------

Income (loss) before
  income taxes........     $5,966     $ 8,499   $(5,761)      190    $(5,453)

Fixed charges.........      3,374       3,152     6,368    14,756     15,801

Less: interest
 charges capitalized..        (30)        (19)      (29)      (13)        (2)
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------

Earnings .............     $9,310     $11,632   $   578   $14,933    $10,346
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------
Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges(A)....        2.8x        3.7x       --       1.0x        --
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------
                           ------     -------   -------   -------    -------
</TABLE>

------------------------

(A) Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $5,455 in
    fiscal year 1999. (1997 = $5,790)
### §716. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section, acts June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §9, 36 Stat. 538; July 27, 1939, ch. 388, §1, 53 Stat. 1130, related to employment of temporary draftsmen. See section 902 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
§ 319.401 Senior-level positions. ( a ) *General.* SL positions may be in either the competitive or excepted service. This section only applies to appointments in the competitive service from a civil service register. Reassignments, promotions, transfers, and reinstatements to SL positions in the competitive service shall be made in accordance with applicable statutory and regulatory provisions. Employment of SL employees in the excepted service is covered by 5 CFR, part 302. ( 1 ) Agency heads are delegated authority to recruit and examine applicants for SL positions in the competitive service, establish competitor inventories, and issue certificates of eligibility in conformance with the requirements of this section, other applicable regulations, and statute.
( 2 ) Agencies shall take such action as OPM may require to correct an action taken under delegated authority.
( 3 ) Delegated authority may be terminated or suspended at any time by OPM for reasons such as, but not limited to: ( i ) Evidence of unequal treatment of candidates; or
( ii ) Identifiable merit system abuses.
( b ) *Recruitment.* ( 1 ) A recruiting plan, with appropriate emphasis on affirmative recruitment, must be developed and followed.
( 2 ) Vacancy announcements must remain open for a minimum of 14 calendar days. The closing date may not be a nonworkday.
( 3 ) State Job Service offices must be notified of the vacancy in accordance with 5 CFR 330.102. Publication in OPM's listing of Senior Executive Service and other executive vacancies, which is provided the offices, will satisfy this requirement.
( c ) *Evaluation and selection.* Examination and selection procedures, and rights of applicants, are subject to the same provisions in statute and regulation that govern civil service examinations and appointments in general.
( d ) *Records.* ( 1 ) Agencies must maintain records sufficient to allow reconstruction of the merit staffing process.
( 2 ) Records must be kept for 2 years after an appointment, or, if no appointment is made, for 2 years after the closing date of the vacancy announcement.
#### Elizabeth Seversky, Respondent, v. Helene Anderson, Appellant.

Ho opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-82718 and 333-54438) and on Form S-3 (No.333-87894) of Entravision Communications Corporation of our report dated March 13, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financialstatement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K**.**

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 13, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.908 Agency obligation. ( a ) *Time limits.* An employee is to be reemployed by the reemploying agency as promptly as possible, but not later than 30 calendar days after receipt of the reemployment application or on termination of the term of employment with the Commission, whichever is later.
( b ) *Conditions.* An employee will be reemployed or returned from detail without loss of pay, seniority, or other rights or benefits to which the employee would have been entitled had he or she not been transferred or detailed. An employee in the Senior Executive Service will be reemployed or returned at not less than the rate at which paid immediately before the transfer or detail. An employee who is reemployed is not eligible for grade or pay retention under part 536 of this chapter based on a grade or rate of pay attained while employed by the Commission.
( c ) *Position to which entitled.* ( 1 ) If the function with which the employee's former position was identified has been transferred, the employee's right is to a position in the gaining agency or activity.
( 2 ) An employee whose right is to a position in the Senior Executive Service may be reemployed in or returned to any Senior Executive Service position in the former agency for which qualified.
( 3 ) All other employees are entitled to be reemployed in or returned to a position at the same grade or level and in the same competitive area as the position last held in the former agency. If the reemployment would cause the separation or demotion of another employee, the applicant should be considered an employee for the purpose of applying the reduction-in-force regulations to determine to what, if any, position the employee is entitled. If the employee is not placed at the former grade or level, the agency must extend consideration beyond the competitive area. Responsibility for reemployment is agencywide.
( 4 ) Reemployment may be at a higher grade than that to which the employee is entitled if all appropriate standards and requirements are satisfied and if this will not cause the displacement of another employee.
( 5 ) The reemployment obligation may be satisfied by placement in any position within the agency that is acceptable to the employee.
( d ) *Agency refusal to reemploy.* An agency may refuse to reemploy under this section only when the employee was separated from the Commission for serious cause showing unsuitability for reemployment.