alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

#### § 315.403 Acquisition of competitive status.

A person who was serving probation when he was separated and who is reinstated under § 315.401 acquires a competitive status automatically on completion of probation.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4(e)  



	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY	 	P. O. BOX 2606	 	BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA    35202-2606
	





 
 

WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGE ENDORSEMENT
  for Terminal Illness or Nursing Home Confinement    
    


We
are amending the Contract to which this endorsement is attached by adding the following provisions: 



Waiver of Surrender Charge—We will waive any applicable surrender charge if, at any time after the first Contract Year: 



	(1)
	you
are first diagnosed as having a terminal illness by a physician that is not related to you or the Annuitant; or,



	(2)
	you
enter, for a period of at least ninety (90) days, a facility which is both:



	(a)
	licensed
by the state; and,



	(b)
	qualified
as a skilled nursing home facility under Medicare or Medicaid. 








The
term "terminal illness" means that you are diagnosed as having a non-correctable medical condition that, with a reasonable degree of medical certainty, will result in your death in
less than 12 months. A "physician" is a medical doctor licensed by a state=s Board of Medical Examiners, or similar authority in the United States, acting within the scope of his or her
license. You must submit written proof that is satisfactory to us of a terminal illness or nursing home confinement. We reserve the right to require an examination by a physician of our choice at our
expense. 


Once
the waiver of surrender charge has been granted no surrender charge will apply to the Contract in the future and no additional Purchase Payments will be accepted. 


If
any Owner is not an individual, the Waiver of Surrender Charge provisions will apply to the Annuitant. 




Signed
for the company and made a part of the contract as of the Effective date. 



	PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY	 	 
	

/s/  DEBORAH J. LONG      
 Secretary

	
 	

 











QuickLinks


WAIVER OF SURRENDER CHARGE ENDORSEMENT for Terminal Illness or Nursing Home Confinement
Exhibit 23





LOGO





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



To the Board of Directors

Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.

Cheraw, South Carolina



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Great Pee Dee
Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-79339) of our report dated July 16, 2004 on the consolidated financial statements of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of and for the years ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, which appears in the 2004 Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc.



LOGO

Asheville, North Carolina

September 28, 2004
#### The Bigelow Blue Stone Company *vs.*Magee and others.

. I. When a creditor comes into equity to reach the equitable interest of his debtor in land, he must show a judgment which would, in case the legal title to the property were in the debtor, be a legal lien thereonj and an execution returned unsatisfied.

2. It is not necessary, in such case, to show a levy of an execution on the land which he seeks to reach.

On creditors’ bill and general demurrer.

*Mr. T. D. Hodges,*for demurrants.

*Mr. W.*P. *Wilson,*for complainants.

The Chancellor.

The bill sets forth the recovery by the complainants of a judgment against Magee, for their debt, the issuing of an execution thereon, and the return thereof, *nulla bona aut tenementa.*The object of the suit is to reach real estate, the legal title whereto is and was, when the judgment was recovered, in another of the defendants, by whom, as the complainants allege, it was and is held in trust for Magee in fraud of his creditors.

The question presented under the demurrer is, whether it is necessary, in order to maintain the suit, to allege, and therefore to prove, a levy on the property under an execution on the judgment.

*393When a creditor conies into equity to reach the equitable interest of his debtor in land, he must show a judgment which would, in case the legal title to the property were in the debtor, be a legal lien thereon, and an execution returned unsatisfied.

This will show that his remedy at law is exhausted, and will entitle him to the aid of equity.

It is not necessary, in such case, to show a levy of an execution on the land which he seeks to reach. *Robert*v. *Hodges,*1 *C. E. Green*29*9; Dunham*v. *Cox,*2 *Stockt.*437; *Cuyler*v. *Moreland,*6 *Paige*273.

'The demurrer will be overruled, with costs.
|  |     **Product reviews**  **Shopping**  **Tech news**  **Downloads** |  |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|  |                                                                                                                       |  |
|  |  | b.gif width=1 height=9 /> |
|--|--|---------------------------|
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
 Barbeques Galore Limited
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No 333-46529) of Barbeques Galore Limited of our audit report dated
March 10, 1999 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Barbeques
Galore Limited and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and for the year ended
June 30, 1996, which report appears in the January 31, 1999 annual report on
Form 20-F of Barbeques Galore Limited.
 
/s/ Horwath Sydney Partnership
 
April 29, 1999
Sydney, Australia
§ 297.306 Appeal of a denial of a request to amend a record. ( a ) An individual who disagrees with an initial denial to amend a record may file a written appeal of that denial to the appropriate official. In submitting an appeal, the individual should provide a copy of the original request for amendment, a copy of the initial denial decision, and a statement of the specific reasons why the initial denial is believed to be in error. Any appeal should be submitted to the official designated in the initial decision letter. The appeal should include the words “PRIVACY ACT APPEAL” in capital letters on the envelope and at the top of the letter of appeal.
( b ) The reviewing official should complete the review and make a final determination in writing no later than 30 working days from the date on which the appeal is received. When circumstances warrant, this timeframe may be extended.
( c ) If the Office grants the appeal, it will take the necessary steps either to amend the record itself or to require the originating agency to amend the record. When appropriate and possible, prior recipients of the record should be notified of the Office's action.
( d ) The Office reserves the right to hold in abeyance any Privacy Act appeal concerning a record when an individual is involved in challenging an action involving that record in another administrative, judicial, or quasi-judicial forum. At the conclusion of such a challenge, the individual can resubmit the appeal.
( e ) If the Office denies the appeal, it will include in the decision letter notification of the appellant's right to judicial review.
#### § 2421.20 Election agreement.

*Election agreement* means an agreement under part 2422 of this subchapter signed by all the parties, and approved by the Regional Director, concerning the details and procedures of a representation election in an appropriate unit.

[60 FR 67291, Dec. 29, 1995]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Health Level Seven, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Health Level Seven, Inc. 
(``HL7'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Health Level 
Seven, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI. The nature and scope of HL7's standards 
development activities are: To provide a comprehensive framework and 
related standards for the exchange, integration, sharing, and retrieval 
of electronic health information that supports clinical practice and 
the management, delivery and evaluation of health services. 
Specifically, to create flexible, cost effective standards, guidelines, 
and methodologies to enable healthcare information system 
interoperability and sharing of electronic health records.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24568 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-019 March 28, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH FPL OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT TURKEY POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Florida Power & Light officials

on Wednesday, April 2, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Turkey Point nuclear power plant south of Miami, Florida.

The meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers Room of the Homestead

City Hall, 790 N. Homestead Blvd., in Homestead, Florida. The public is invited to observe the

meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any

questions.

A letter from the NRC to Florida Power & Light addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, Turkey

Point operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a

level requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is

available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/tp_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will also

conduct inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders, and a review

of the plant staff’s activities in response to an NRC Bulletin on reactor vessel heads and vessel head

penetrations.

 Current performance indicators for the two units at the Turkey Point plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/TP1/tp1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/TP2/tp2_chart.html

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1609 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1609

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, as the ``Admiral 
                  Donald Davis Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 
West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, and known as the Brookfield 
Main Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Admiral Donald 
Davis Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Admiral Donald Davis Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Suite101.com, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cara Williams, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Cara Williams
------------------------
Cara Williams
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002



                                       36
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 08, 2009

 
| /s/ Gregory E. Lichtwardt           |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory E. Lichtwardt               |
| Executive Vice President, Treasurer |
| and Chief Financial Officer         |

 

----
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-001 January 8, 2004

NRC ANNOUNCES THE AVAILABILITY OF LICENSE RENEWAL 

APPLICATION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing that copies of an application for a 20-year

renewal of the operating licenses for Units 1, 2 and 3 at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant are

available to interested parties. The Tennessee Valley Authority submitted the application on 

January 6. 

The Browns Ferry plant is located near Decatur, Alabama, and the current operating licenses for

Units 1, 2 and 3 expire on December 20, 2013, June 28, 2014, and July 2, 2016, respectively.

A copy of the application is available on the NRC web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/browns-ferry.html . The

application also is available through the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management

System (ADAMS). Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document

Room staff at 301-415-4737 or 800-397-4209, or by sending a message to pdr@nrc.gov via e-mail.

In addition, copies of the license renewal application are available at the Athens-Limestone

Public Library, at 405 South Street E, Athens, Alabama, 35611. 

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine whether

it contains enough information for the required formal review. If the application has sufficient

information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and will announce an opportunity

to request a hearing.

###
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allan J. Kent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

















/s/ Allan J. Kent


--------------------------


Allan J. Kent


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2010
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:02 PM 

To: rick.anderson@faypwc.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; ScottB@LVMetals.com; john.caskey@nema.org; 

jerry.corkran@cooperindustries.com; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; adelaski@standardsASAP.org; 

Teckman@nwcouncil.org; gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; rgreeson@federalpacific.com; 

bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; jhodge@howard.com; mhyland@appanet.org; dave.millure@metglas.com; 

snadel@aceee.org; richardparkerdc@gmail.com; wes.patterson@us.abb.com; 

Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; Raymond.Polinski@ATImetals.com; srosenstock@eei.org; rroy@nrdc.org; 

robert.saint@nreca.coop; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; mark.e.stoering@xcelenergy.com; 

BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; 

Jim.Creevy@nema.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org; pkumar@publicpower.org; 

jmauer@standardsASAP.org; paul.ryan@hitmet.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; kwinder@mleainc.com; 

cabolduc@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; Jim.Raba@ee.doe.gov; Michael Rivest; GJRosenquist@lbl.gov 

Subject: DOE MV Transformer rulemaking - Analysis is now online 

Members of medium voltage transformer negotiating committee: 

Just a quick note to welcome you again to the committee and let you know (in case any of you 

haven't heard already) that the updated engineering analysis and life-cycle cost and payback 

period analysis is posted on the DOE website at the following link: 

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/distribution_transformer

s.html

We will reserve substantive discussion of the analysis for our first meeting on Sept. 15. If 

anyone has clarifying questions to ask that would be helpful to table before the meeting -- or if 

anyone sees any gaps that the Navigant/LBL team might be able to fill between now and Sept 15 

-- please so indicate in a reply to the entire group and we will work on getting you a timely 

clarification -- all with the goal of making our first meeting as efficient and productive as 

possible. Again, no arguments pre-meeting please. Just clarifying questions and suggestions for 

refinement or supplementation of analysis. 

I've spoken with many of you already. If we haven't yet spoken, I will be reaching out to you 

shortly. I look forward to working with you. 

Best wishes, 

Richard Parker 

Facilitator
#### Henry Floyd GILCHRIST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1298.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 2002.

Decided May 22, 2002.

Henry Floyd Gilchrist, Appellant Pro Se. Robert F. Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Terry Hearn Bailey, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Henry Floyd Gilchrist appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order denying his motions for a protective order and for appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### §3856. Referrals for appropriate action by foreign country

Notwithstanding sections 3851, 3852, 3853, and 3855 of this title, if a violation of the Convention is committed by a vessel registered in or of the nationality of a country that is a party to the Convention, or by a vessel operated under the authority of a country that is a party to the Convention, the Secretary, acting in coordination with the Secretary of State, may refer the matter to the government of the country of the vessel's registry or nationality, or under whose authority the vessel is operating, for appropriate action, rather than taking the actions otherwise required or authorized by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1046, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3031.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle D (§§1041–1048) of title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3029, which enacted this subchapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of subtitle D to the Code, see Tables.