alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Annie Wallace, Respondent, against Paul L. Ross et al., Constituting the Temporary City Housing Rent Commission, Appellants.

■ Order annulling determination of the temporary city housing rent commission, which denied respondent’s application for a certificate of eviction, and directing the issuance of such a certificate, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition dismissed, without costs. The Legislature, by the enactment of chapter 699 of the Laws of 1948, effectively validated New York City Local Law No. 12 of 1948. That local law amended Local Law No. 66 of 1947 (validated by L. 1948, eh. 4), which applied by its terms even to pending dispossess proceedings in which final orders had already been obtained. *(Matter of Molnar*v. *Cwtin,*273 App. Div. 322.) The 1948 Local Law amended the provisions of the 1947 Local Law so as to require a landlord to show that *“*because of compelling necessity ” he sought in good faith to recover possession of the apartment for his own immediate and personal use. The additional powers granted to the commission under the validated 1948 Local Law may be sustained for reasons advanced in the *Molnar*case (supra). The commission’s exercise of those powers in passing upon an application made before the enactment of the Local Law was proper. (See *Matter of Davis*v. *Board of Ed/Ur*
      *1022
      *cation of City of N. Y.,*288 N. Y. 330; *Matter of Jacobson*v. *Board of Education of City of N. Y.,*265 App. Div. 837.) Upon the present record, it does not appear that the commission had abused its discretion and acted arbitrarily. Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., concurs in the result.
§ 2422.34 What are the parties' rights and obligations when a representation proceeding is pending? ( a ) *Existing recognitions, agreements, and obligations under the Statute.* When a representation proceeding is pending, parties must maintain existing recognitions, follow the terms and conditions of existing collective bargaining agreements, and fulfill all other representational and bargaining responsibilities under the Statute.
( b ) *Unit status of individual employees.* A party may take action based on its position regarding the bargaining unit status of individual employees, under 3 U.S.C. 431(d)(2), 5 U.S.C. 7103(a)(2), and 7112(b) and
( c ) . But its actions may be challenged, reviewed, and remedied where appropriate.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermal analysis research applicable to space station technology needsThermal analysis, optimization, and software research and development at the NASA Langley Research Center which is applicable to analytical design calculations for space station structures are summarized. Topics discussed include integrated thermal-structural software, improved thermal radiation analysis, solution techniques for transient temperatures, unified thermal-structural finite elements, thermal structural sensitivity analysis and optimization, and concept and performance analysis for heat pipes.Document ID19840007358Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsAdelman, H. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1983Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:84658NASA-TM-84658Meeting InformationMeeting: Space State Technol. WorkshopLocation: Williamsburg, VACountry: United StatesStart Date: March 28, 1983End Date: March 31, 1983Accession Number84N15426Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840007358.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KENNY DENARD BLACKMON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4667

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed May 11, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Chet A. Tharpe,

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 15.1



LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-142665) of LAN Airlines S.A. of our report dated
February 14, 2012 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.



LOGO

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

Santiago, Chile

April 2, 2012





PricewaterhouseCoopers, Av. Andrés Bello 2711  Pisos 2, 3, 4y5, Las Condes  Santiago, Chile

RUT: 81.513.400-1  Teléfono: (56) (2) 940 0000  www.pwc.cl
## SUBTITLE II—THE BUDGET PROCESS

Chap.
Sec.
11.
The Budget and Fiscal, Budget, and Program Information
1101
13.
Appropriations
1301
15.
Appropriation Accounting
1501
### §1968. Citation release

#### (a) In general

The Chief of the Capitol Police, with the approval of the Capitol Police Board, may designate a member of the Capitol Police to have responsibility for citation release.

#### (b) Authority

(1) In the same manner as provided for with respect to an official of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia under section 23–1110(a) of the District of Columbia Code, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia shall have the authority to appoint the member of the Capitol Police designated under subsection (a) of this section to take bail or collateral from persons charged with offenses triable in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Pursuant to that authority—

(A) the citation power described in subsection (b) of section 23–1110 of the District of Columbia Code shall be exercised by such member of the Capitol Police in the same manner as by an official of the Metropolitan Police Department; and

(B) paragraph (4) of subsection (b) of section 23–1110 of the District of Columbia Code, relating to failure to appear, shall apply with respect to citations under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.

(2) The United States District Court for the District of Columbia shall have the power to authorize the member of the Capitol Police referred to in subsection (a) of this section to take bond from persons arrested upon writs and process from that court in criminal cases in the same manner as provided for with respect to an official of the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia under the third sentence of section 23–1110(a) of the District of Columbia Code.

(Pub. L. 104–186, title I, §108, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1723.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 212a–5 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 

**- 7251** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff

- Appellee
,

v.

TRAVIS LEQUINN SARVIS ,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

**No. 10** 

**- 7389** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,

Plaintiff

- A ppellee
,

v.

TRAVIS LEQUINN SARVIS ,

Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr

- 01241

- TLW

- 1 )

Submitted : December 16, 2010 D ecided: December 29, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Travis Lequinn Sarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Travis Leq uinn Sarvis appeals the district court ’ s

order s reducing his sentence pursuant to the Government’s Fed.

R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion and denying Sarvis’ motion for a

further reduction . We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
|  |     **Product reviews**  **Shopping**  **Tech news**  **Downloads** |  |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|  |                                                                                                                       |  |
|  |  | b.gif width=1 height=9> |
|--|--|-------------------------|
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1668

To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 North Fifth Street 

in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2003

Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 

North Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ed 

Edmondson United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 101 North 

5 Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, shall be known and 

6 designated as the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States Court7 house’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 
2

•HR 1668 IH 

1 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States 

3 Courthouse’’.

Æ
##### 



1.
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 19, 2007
    /s/ ANTONIO  B. MONAntonio B. MonChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.7
                         CONSULTATION AGREEMENT ADDENDUM

Addendum  to  the Consultation Agreement of the 9th day of September, 2002, made
between  CHANGZHOU  BROADWAY  BUSINESS  DEVELOPMENT  CO. LTD and GLOBAL PROJECTS
CONSULTATIONS  INC  .

Both  parties  mutually  agree  to  the  following  amendment:

Broadway  will pay Global on a retainer basis the agreed sum of US$250,000; such
an  amount  to  be paid to Global or its designate, no later than July 31, 2003.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF  the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of
the  day,  month  and  year  written  below.

Dated:  the  25th  day  of  February,  2003.

CHANGZHOU  BROADWAY  BUSINESS  DEVELOPMENT  CO.  LTD
/s/ Jiaping Jiang
-----------------
Jiaping Jiang

Global Projects Consultations Inc.
/s/ Nico Huang
--------------
Nico Huang
EXHIBIT (10)(iii)(29)

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                             CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.
              DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
                                TRUST AGREEMENT

      WHEREAS, CH Energy Group, Inc. ("Energy Group") maintains the CH Energy
Group, Inc. Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan Trust Agreement
(the "Trust"); and

      WHEREAS, Energy Group desires to amend the Trust to reflect certain
contributions that will be made on behalf of eligible directors.

      NOW, THEREFORE, Energy Group hereby amends the Trust as set forth below,
effective as of September 26, 2003.

      1.    The first sentence of Section 3.1(b) of the Trust is amended in its
            entirety to read as follows:

            "The Company shall contribute to the Trust an amount equal to the
            amount deferred by each Participant for the Plan Year, Company
            Discretionary Contribution Amounts for the Plan Year and
            contributions credited to each Participant's Director Stock Account
            for the Plan Year."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.


                                    CH ENERGY GROUP, INC.


                                    --------------------------------------


                                    FIRST AMERICAN TRUST COMPANY


                                    --------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q OF
FIRSTWAVE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,600<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,475
<PP&E>                                           1,044<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,000
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,994
<SALES>                                          1,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,162
<CGS>                                              396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,461
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (30)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.24)
<FN>
<F1>A/R AND PPE ASSET VALUES REPRESENT NET AMOUNTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The ACRS Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment will hold a meeting on November 16, 2004, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland.

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Tuesday, November 16, 2004—12 p.m. until 3 p.m.*

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the development of guidance on the treatment of uncertainties. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and other interested persons regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Michael R. Snodderly (telephone: 301-415-6927) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted during the meeting.

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Officials between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (e.t.). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

      ( print page 63564)    
Dated: October 27, 2004.

John H. Flack,

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.

[FR Doc. 04-24381 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### In the Matter of L. David Weiss, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

December 18, 1951.

*Frank E. Gordon*for petitioner.

*L. David Weiss,*respondent in person.

Per *Curiam.*

Respondent, in answer to the petition filed herein, admitted that he neglected the interests of his clients and falsely, represented to them the status of their case. The report of an Official Referee, finding that the charge of misconduct has been sustained, contains the following: *“*However, the respondent’s cooperation at the hearing, his candor in admitting the truth of the charges in both his answer and testimony, and his sincere regret for his conduct are commendable. ’ ’

In view of these circumstances, the court is of opinion that a suspension for a period of three months is sufficient punishment.

The respondent should be suspended for three months.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Respondent suspended for a period of three months.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-027 May 7, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC PROPOSES $7,500 FINE AGAINST NEW JERSEY FIRM

FOR FAILING TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF NUCLEAR GAUGE

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $7,500 civil penalty against

a Wayne, N.J., company for a failure to maintain control over a gauge that uses a radioactive

source to measure the thickness of material. The device emits radiation, which both penetrates

and is reflected by the material to be measured. Detectors then assess the amount of radiation

that passes through or is reflected to determine the thickness.

 On January 3, a representative of the Onyx Greentree Landfill in Kersey, Pa.,

informed the NRC that a radioactive source, containing 150 millicuries of americium-241, had

been found in a shipment of waste from Totowa, N.J. Based on information provided by a

consultant to the landfill, the NRC traced the radioactive material to a nuclear gauge that the

Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation, based in Wayne, N.J., had obtained in the past. 

On January 14, the NRC conducted an inspection at the company’s facility. Subsequently, the

company sent the agency a letter on February 5 in which it described the events that led to the

loss of the device and corrective actions it had taken to prevent a recurrence. Saint-Gobain

reported that the gauge had been mistakenly discarded in the normal trash after being

disassembled.

 Based on the information developed during the inspection as well as the company’s

response, the NRC has proposed a $7,500 fine against the firm for failing to maintain control of

the gauge. “Although the gauge’s source was in the shielded condition at the time it was

discovered at the landfill, this violation is of concern to the NRC because (1) the failure to

control the gauge resulted in the loss of radioactive material in the public domain; and (2) such

sources can result in substantial unintended radiation dose to an individual if the source is

removed from the shielded position,” NRC Region I Administration Hubert J. Miller wrote in a

letter to the company regarding the enforcement action.

 Saint-Gobain has informed the NRC that it has implemented several corrective actions

in response to the event. These include recovery of the source from the landfill; shipping the

source back to the manufacturer for proper disposal; inventorying all radioactive sources located
-2-

at its facility; and providing training for all employees involved with work in the areas of the

radioactive devices.

 The company has 30 days from receipt of the letter to either pay the civil penalty or

protest its imposition.

 ###