alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §442. Liability of officers of towing vessel

Any and every master and engineer, or person or persons acting in such capacity, respectively, on board of any boat or vessel, who shall knowingly engage in towing any scow, boat, or vessel loaded with any such prohibited matter to any point or place of deposit, or discharge in the waters of any harbor subject to this subchapter, or to any point or place elsewhere than within the limits defined and permitted by the supervisor of the harbor, shall be deemed guilty of a violation of section 441 of this title, and shall, upon conviction, be punishable as provided for offenses in violation of section 441 of this title, and shall also have his license revoked or suspended for a term to be fixed by the judge before whom tried and convicted.

(June 29, 1888, ch. 496, §2, 25 Stat. 209; Pub. L. 85–802, §1(2), Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 970.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1958—Pub. L. 85–802 substituted "any harbor subject to this subchapter" for "the harbor of New York, or in its adjacent or tributary waters, or in those of Long Island Sound", and struck out "hereinafter mentioned" after "supervisor of the harbor".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–802 effective on sixtieth day after Aug. 28, 1958, see section 2 of Pub. L. 85–802, set out as a note under section 441 of this title.
### §1521. Negotiations with Canada and Mexico; report to Congress

The President of the United States is authorized and requested to enter into negotiations with the Governments of Canada and Mexico to determine:

(1) the need for intergovernmental understandings, agreements, or treaties to protect the interests of the people of Canada, Mexico, and the United States and of any party or parties involved with the construction or operation of deepwater ports; and

(2) the desirability of undertaking joint studies and investigations designed to insure protection of the environment and to eliminate any legal and regulatory uncertainty, to assure that the interests of the people of Canada, Mexico, and the United States are adequately met.

The President shall report to the Congress the actions taken, the progress achieved, the areas of disagreement, and the matters about which more information is needed, together with his recommendations for further action.

(Pub. L. 93–627, §22, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2147.)
### §1518. Adverse personnel actions

An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government violating section 1517(a) of this title shall be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension from duty without pay or removal from office.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 932.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1518 | 31:665(i)(1)(words before semicolon related to (h)). | R.S. §3679(i)(1)(words before semicolon related to (h)); Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §4(1st par.), 33 Stat. 1257; Feb. 27, 1906, ch. 510, §3, 34 Stat. 48; restated Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1211, 64 Stat. 768. |

The words "In addition to any penalty or liability under other law" are omitted as surplus. The words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 9 of the Act of June 26, 1912 (ch. 182, 37 Stat. 184).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7601

FLOYD WEAKS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOEL THREATT; TONY CLINE; MICHAEL YORK; D. SOUTHERN; HARRY POLKTON, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-721-4) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 4, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Floyd Weaks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Neil Clark Dalton, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Floyd Weaks, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Weaks v. Threatt , No. CA-96-721-4 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §2353. Structural health monitoring

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall design and develop a structural health monitoring program to assess and improve the condition of infrastructure constructed and maintained by the Corps of Engineers, including research, design, and development of systems and frameworks for—

(1) response to flood and earthquake events;

(2) predisaster mitigation measures;

(3) lengthening the useful life of the infrastructure; and

(4) identifying risks due to sea level rise.

#### (b) Consultation and considerations

In developing the program under subsection (a), the Secretary shall—

(1) consult with academic and other experts; and

(2) consider models for maintenance and repair information, the development of degradation models for real-time measurements and environmental inputs, and research on qualitative inspection data as surrogate sensors.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1151, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1661.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 114–322, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
§ 1302.3 Responsibility for responding to requests. ( a ) *Acknowledgment of requests.* OMB will acknowledge your request for access in writing and provide an individualized tracking number. Upon request, OMB will make information available to you about the status of your request using the assigned tracking number.
( b ) *Timing of responses to a Privacy Act request for access.* OMB will respond to Privacy Act requests for access to records according to the order in which OMB receives the requests. Consistent with OMB's FOIA procedures at 5 CFR 1303.40(b), OMB may designate multiple processing tracks that distinguish between simple and more complex Privacy Act requests for access, based on the estimated amount of work or time needed to process the request.
( c ) *Additional information.* If, after receiving a request, OMB determines that your request does not reasonably describe the records sought, OMB will inform you what additional information is needed and why the request is otherwise insufficient. If a request does not reasonably describe the records sought, OMB's response to the request may be delayed.
( d ) *Grant of request for access.* Once OMB makes a determination to grant a request for access, OMB will provide you a written response, which may include the following: ( 1 ) A statement as to whether OMB will grant access by providing a copy of the record through electronic means or the mail; and
( 2 ) The amount of fees charged, if any (see § 1302.7). (Fees are applicable only to requests for duplicates.)
( e ) *Adverse determination of request for access.* OMB will notify you of an adverse determination denying a request for access in writing. Adverse determinations, or denials of requests, consist of: A determination to withhold any requested record in whole or in part; a determination that a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that what has been requested is not a record subject to the Privacy Act; a determination on any disputed fee matter; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment. OMB's notification letter to you will include: ( 1 ) The decision of OMB whether to grant in whole, or deny any part of the request;
( 2 ) The reasons for the determination for any portion of the request that is denied; and
( 3 ) A description of the procedure by which the OMB decision to deny your request may be appealed, including the name and address of the official with whom you may lodge such an appeal.
No. 89-1139.

#### Local 827, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers *v.*Trad et al.

Super. Ct. N. J., App. Div. Certiorari denied.
§ 1201.21 Notice of appeal rights. When an agency issues a decision notice to an employee on a matter that is appealable to the Board, the agency must provide the employee with the following: ( a ) Notice of the time limits for appealing to the Board, the requirements of § 1201.22(c), and the address of the appropriate Board office for filing the appeal;
( b ) A copy, or access to a copy, of the Board's regulations;
( c ) A copy, or access to a copy, of the MSPB appeal form available at the Board's Web site (*http://www.mspb.gov*), and
( d ) Notice of any right the employee has to file a grievance or seek corrective action under subchapters II and III of 5 U.S.C. chapter 12, including: ( 1 ) Whether the election of any applicable grievance procedure will result in waiver of the employee's right to file an appeal with the Board;
( 2 ) Whether both an appeal to the Board and a grievance may be filed on the same matter and, if so, the circumstances under which proceeding with one will preclude proceeding with the other, and specific notice that filing a grievance will not extend the time limit for filing an appeal with the Board;
( 3 ) Whether there is any right to request Board review of a final decision on a grievance in accordance with § 1201.155 of this part; and
( 4 ) The effect of any election under 5 U.S.C. 7121(g), including the effect that seeking corrective action under subchapters II and III of 5 U.S.C. chapter 12 will have on the employee's appeal rights before the Board.
( e ) Notice of any right the employee has to file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or to grieve allegations of unlawful discrimination, consistent with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7121(d) and 29 CFR 1614.301 and 1614.302.
( f ) The name or title and contact information for the agency official to whom the Board should send the Acknowledgment Order and copy of the appeal in the event the employee files an appeal with the Board. Contact information should include the official's mailing address, email address, telephone and fax numbers.
[74 FR 9343, Mar. 4, 2009, as amended at 77 FR 62364, Oct. 12, 2012; 78 FR 21518, Apr. 11, 2013]
### §72b–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 753, title I, §134(b), 60 Stat. 832, related to reports of committees and subcommittees of the Senate and House of Representatives on employed personnel. See section 72c of this title and the Standing Rules of the Senate. Section 2(a) of Senate Resolution No. 274, Ninety-sixth Congress, Nov. 14, 1979, provided in part that this section, insofar as it relates to the Senate, is repealed.
### §1485. Rules and regulations

The Secretary may issue reasonable rules and regulations which he considers appropriate and necessary for the effective implementation of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §16, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 10.)
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: 

 Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 1 

 Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev CBI? 

 Yes 

 No 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Incoming 

 Outgoing 

Date: 08/01/11 Time: 3:06 am 

 pm 

Company Name: ISG Sparrows, Inc. ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick 

Contact Name: Russ Becker (public contact) Contact Phone Number: (410)388-6622 

General Subject: 2009 DMR Chlorine Discharges 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On August 1, 2011 at 3:06pm I called Russ Becker and left a message explaining that I would like to confirm 

the facility’s 2009 DMR Chlorine Discharges. 

On August1, 2011 at 3:21pm Mr. Becker returned my call. He explained that the facility has a chlorination 

system in their treatment process and then also has a dechlorination process. Their NPDES permit limit for total 

residual chlorine for outfall 001 is 0.2 mg/L and they sample once a day, at least 5 days per 7 day week. Every 

month they then report their daily maximum. All 2009 discharges are below this permit limit. The flow is very 

large because this outfall is from a once through non-contact cooling system (loop) for power generation for 

their onsite power plant. The wastewater is chlorinated and then dechlorinated and the samples are taken at the 

discharge point. Outfall 001 is a service water intake. They have never had a permitting issue with chlorine; 

their measurements have always been below their NPDES permit limit. Mr. Becker also stated that this is a 

continuous process and they are discharging chlorine constantly, although some months their tests read zero 

discharge. I thanked him for his time and told him I’d call back with any further questions.
### §560. Contributions from private parties; return of excess

The Secretary of the Army is authorized to receive from private parties such funds as may be contributed by them to be expended in connection with funds appropriated by the United States for any authorized work of public improvement of rivers and harbors whenever such work and expenditure may be considered by the Chief of Engineers as advantageous to the interests of navigation: Provided, That when contributions heretofore or hereafter made by local interests for river and harbor improvements, in accordance with specific requirements or under general authority of Congress, are in excess of the actual cost of the work contemplated and properly chargeable to such contributions, such excess contributions may, with the approval of the Secretary of the Army, be returned to the proper representatives of the contributing interests, unless the provision of law under which the contribution is made requires that the entire contribution be retained by the United States.

(Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 142, §4, 38 Stat. 1053; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act Mar. 4, 1915, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1915".

#### Prior Provisions

Section superseded act Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 144, §8, 37 Stat. 827, which read as follows: "The Secretary of War is hereby authorized to receive from private parties such funds as may be contributed by them to be expended in connection with funds appropriated by the United States for any authorized work of public improvement of rivers and harbors, whenever such work and expenditure may be considered by the Chief of Engineers as advantageous to the interests of navigation."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-03-060 September 5, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DAVIS-BESSE OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET SEPT. 10 IN OAK HARBOR, OH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Davis-Besse oversight panel will hold two meetings on

Wednesday, September 10, in Oak Harbor, Ohio, to review the status of recent activities at the DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station. 

The plant, operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company near Oak Harbor, has been

shut down since February 16 of last year due to the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head. 

The meetings will be held in the Oak Harbor High School Auditorium, at 11661 West State

Route 163, in Oak Harbor.

The first meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EDT), when the NRC oversight panel, set up to monitor

the activities associated with the plant’s recovery from problems which led to the reactor vessel head

corrosion, will meet with utility officials. The meeting will focus on the status of repairs at the plant,

results of recent NRC inspections and upcoming activities. The public is invited to observe the

business portion of the meeting and will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of

the NRC staff before the meeting is adjourned.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (EDT) for the oversight panel to update the public on

NRC’s activities related to the reactor vessel degradation and to provide a summary of the earlier

meeting. The public will be invited to ask questions and make comments.

The transcripts of both oversight panel meetings will be posted in several weeks on the NRC’’s

web site - http://www.nrc.gov. Select "Davis-Besse" from the Key Topics menu. 

The NRC oversight panel includes NRC management and staff from its Region III office in

Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland; and the NRC Resident Inspector

Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site.

# # # # #
p. ~

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL TICKET

Date Printed: Sep 19, 2006 15:47

PAPER NUMIBER: 

ACTION OFFICE: 

AUTHOR: 

AFFILIATION: 

ADDRESSEE: 

SUBJECT: 

ACTION: 

DISTRIBUTION: 

LETTER DATE: 

ACKNOWLEDGED 

SPECIAL HANDLING:

LTR-06-0462 

EDO

LOGGING DATE: 09/19/2006 

-T '. S C~A L STP

GOV Tim Pawlenty 

MN-GOV 

CHRM Dale Klein 

Concerns the regulation by Minnesota of certain radioactive materials

DE.DMR 

DEDIA

Appropriate 

RF 

09/07/2_006 

No 

Immediate release to the public via SECY/EDO/DPC.

NOTES:

FILE LOCATION: ADAMS

DATE DUE: DATE SIGNED:
LSTATE OF MINNESOTA 

Office of Governor Tim Pawlenty 

130 State Capitol . 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Saint Paul, MN 55155 

September 7, 2006 

Mr. Dale E. Klein, Chairman 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Washington, DC 20555 

Dear Chairman Klein: 

I am responding to your August 18, 2006 letter concerning the regulation by Minnesota of 

certain radioactive materials. 

As provided by Minnesota Statutes, §144.1202, the Minnesota Department of Health has 

established regulatory authority and oversight responsibility for radioactive materials, which in 

addition to the former definition of byproduct material includes radium and certain other 

radioactive materials such as those made radioactive in particle accelerators. As such, the 

Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) has no impact on Minnesota's program. 

I certify that (a) The State of Minnesota has a program for licensing the new byproduct 

materials that is adequate to protect the public health and safety, as determined by the 

Commission; and (b) The State of Minnesota intends to continue to implement the regulatory 

responsibility with respect to the new byproduct materials. The Agreement Between The United 

States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the State of Minnesota For Discontinuance Of Certain 

Commission Regulatory Authority and Responsibility Within The State should be considered to 

include the new byproduct materials without a formal amendment to the Agreement as 

provided for by § 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. 

If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact John Linc Stine, Director of 

Environmental Health at the Minnesota Department of Health, P.O. Box 64975, St. Paul, MN 

55164-0975, phone number 651-201-4675, or e-mail john.stine@health.state.mn.us. 

Sincerely, 

Tim Pawlenty 

Governor 

cc: Janet Schlueter, Director Office of State and Tribal Programs 

Voice: (651) 296-3391 or (800) 657-3717 Fax: (651) 296-2089 TDD: (651) 296-0075 or (800) 657-3598 

Web site: http: //www.govemor.state.mn.us An Equal Opportunity Employer 

Printed on recycled paper containing 15% post consumer material
STATE OF MINNESOTA 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155

'-n~ ,4raIwv B~w S. 

02 1A $ 00.390 

0004626843 SEP11 2006 

MAiLEDFROM ZIPCO1 55155

Mr. Dale E. Klein, Chairman 

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20555
### §441i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 441i was editorially reclassified as section 30125 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### § 330.403 Positions brought into the competitive service.

An agency may convert the appointment of a nonpreference eligible whose restricted position was brought into the competitive service under part 316 of this chapter, and who meets the requirements for conversion under part 315 of this chapter, to career or career conditional appointment.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with
the annual report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, WU Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to the best of my
knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ WU YuxiangWU Yuxiang Chief Financial Officer June 29, 2006


*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3851. Criminal enforcement

Any person who knowingly violates paragraph (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 3841(a) of this title or section 3841(b) of this title shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1041, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3029.)
#### § 1215.10 Statute of limitations.

If a debt has been outstanding for more than 10 years after the agency's right to collect the debt first accrued, the agency may not collect by salary offset unless facts material to the Government's right to collect were not known and could not reasonably have been known by the official or officials who were charged with the responsibility for discovery and collection of such debts.