alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1313a. Revised water quality standards

The review, revision, and adoption or promulgation of revised or new water quality standards pursuant to section 303(c) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1313(c)] shall be completed by the date three years after December 29, 1981. No grant shall be made under title II of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act [33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.] after such date until water quality standards are reviewed and revised pursuant to section 303(c), except where the State has in good faith submitted such revised water quality standards and the Administrator has not acted to approve or disapprove such submission within one hundred and twenty days of receipt.

(Pub. L. 97–117, §24, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1632.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1948, ch. 758, as amended generally by Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 816. Title II of the Act is classified generally to subchapter II (§1281 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1251 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Municipal Wastewater Treatment Construction Grant Amendments of 1981, and not as part of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act which comprises this chapter.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0203 - Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Briefing

Accession Number: ML033220531

Date Released: Wednesday, December 10, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML033220496 - SECY-03-0203 - EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) BRIEFING (29 page(s), 11/20/2003)
    - ML033220549 - SECY-03-0203- Attachment 2 - EEO Workforce Profile Data 1-14 (15 page(s), 10/20/2003)
    - ML033220557 - SECY-03-0203-Attachment 2 - EEO Workforce Profile Data 15-35 (20 page(s), 10/20/2003)
    - ML033220571 - SECY-03-0203 - Attachment 1 - August 21, 2003, SRM Response Attachment (Technical Employees by Office, Ethinicity and Gender) (1 page(s), 7/31/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 3101.101 General. ( a ) *Purpose.* In accordance with 5 CFR 2635.105, the regulations in this part apply to employees of the Department of the Treasury and supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch contained in 5 CFR part 2635. Employees are required to comply with 5 CFR part 2635, this part, and bureau guidance and procedures established pursuant to this section. Department employees are also subject to any additional rules of conduct that the Department or their employing bureaus are authorized to issue. *See* 31 CFR part 0, Department of the Treasury Employee Rules of Conduct.
( b ) *Bureau instructions.* With the concurrence of the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO), bureaus of the Department of the Treasury are authorized to issue instructions or manual issuances providing explanatory guidance and establishing procedures necessary to implement this part and part 2635 of this title. *See* 5 CFR 2635.105(c).
( c ) *Definition of “agency designee”.* As used in this part and in part 2635 of this title, the term “agency designee” refers to any employee who has been delegated authority by an instruction or manual issuance issued by a bureau under paragraph (b) of this section to make a determination, give an approval, or take other action required or permitted by this part or part 2635 of this title with respect to another employee. *See* 5 CFR 2635.102(b).
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-1506

_____________________________

HANNAH GASTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda McCallum, Judge.

January 10, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
TN: DT-95-14

To: NRC Management Directives Custodians

Subject: Elimination of Management Directive 10.157, “Personnel

Management Evaluation”

Purpose: Directive and Handbook 10.157 (formerly Manual Chapter

and Appendix 4102, as well as its associated Bulletin No.

4102-156) are being eliminated.

Note: Please remove material under Tab 10.157 and

discard. Do not remove Tab 10.157; it must remain in

place as a reserved number.

Guidance is contained in 5 CFR. Any further guidance could

be incorporated in the Office of Personnel internal operating

procedures, as appropriate or desired.

Office of Origin: Office of Personnel

Contact: David Woodend, 415-7102

Date Approved: July 12, 1995

Volume: 10 Personnel Management

Part: 7 General Personnel Management Provisions

Directive: 10.157 [RESERVED]

Availability: None

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

DIRECTIVE TRANSMITTAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION
#### § 2635.901 General.

In addition to the Standards of Ethical Conduct set forth in subparts A through H of this part, there are a number of statutes that establish standards to which an employee's conduct must conform. The list set forth in § 2635.902 references some of the more significant of those statutes. It is not comprehensive and includes only references to statutes of general applicability. While it includes references to several of the basic conflict of interest statutes whose standards are explained in more detail throughout this part, it does not include references to statutes of more limited applicability, such as statutes that apply only to officers and employees of the Department of Defense.
### §3907. Relationship to other laws

(a) A claim for an interest penalty not paid under this chapter may be filed under section 7103 of title 41.

(b)(1) An interest penalty under this chapter does not continue to accrue—

(A) after a claim for a penalty is filed under chapter 71 of title 41; or

(B) for more than one year.

(2) Paragraph (1) of this subsection does not prevent an interest penalty from accruing under section 7109(a)(1) and (b) of title 41 after a penalty stops accruing under this chapter. A penalty accruing under section 7109(a)(1) and (b) may accrue on an unpaid contract payment and on the unpaid penalty under this chapter.

(c) Except as provided in section 3904 of this title, this chapter does not require an interest penalty on a payment that is not made because of a dispute between the head of an agency and a business concern over the amount of payment or compliance with the contract. A claim related to the dispute, and interest payable for the period during which the dispute is being resolved, is subject to chapter 71 of title 41.

(Added Pub. L. 97–452, §1(18)(A), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2477, §3906; renumbered §3907, Pub. L. 100–496, §9(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 2460; amended Pub. L. 111–350, §5(h)(8), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3849.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3906(a) | 31 App.:1803(a)(1). | May 21, 1982, Pub. L. 97–177, §4, 96 Stat. 87. |
| 3906(b) | 31 App.:1803(a)(2), (3). | |
| 3906(c) | 31 App.:1803(b). | |

In the section, the words "be construed to" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (a), the words "not paid under this chapter" are substituted for "which a Federal agency has failed to pay in accordance with the requirements of section 2 or 3 of this chapter" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b)(2), the word "accruing" is added for clarity. The word "both" is omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c), the words "with respect to disputes concerning discounts", "by the required payment date", and "other allegations concerning" are omitted as surplus.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–350, §5(h)(8)(A), substituted "section 7103 of title 41" for "section 6 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 605)".

Subsec. (b)(1)(A). Pub. L. 111–350, §5(h)(8)(B), substituted "chapter 71 of title 41" for "the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)".

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 111–350, §5(h)(8)(C), substituted "section 7109(a)(1) and (b) of title 41" for "section 12 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 611)" and "section 7109(a)(1) and (b) may" for "section 12 may".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–350, §5(h)(8)(D), substituted "chapter 71 of title 41" for "the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)".

1988—Pub. L. 100–496 renumbered section 3906 of this title as this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-091 June 9, 2005

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY FOR HEARING ON APPLICATION

TO RENEW OPERATING LICENSE FOR PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has announced the opportunity to request a hearing on an

application to renew the operating license for the Palisades Nuclear Plant for an additional 20 years.

The Palisades plant is a pressurized water reactor, located 5 miles south of South Haven, Mich.

The Nuclear Management Co., LLC, submitted the renewal application March 22, as well as

supplemental information on May 5. The current operating license for Palisades expires on March 24,

2011.

The NRC staff has determined that the application, as supplemented, contains sufficient

information for the agency to formally "docket," or file, the application and begin its technical review.

Docketing the application does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds,

nor does it indicate whether the Commission will grant the application.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing will be published shortly in the Federal Register.

Petitions requesting a hearing may be filed anytime within 60 days of the notice. Petitions may be filed

by anyone whose interest may be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a

party in the proceeding.

A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of

the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Requests may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101

or e-mail to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov. A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of

General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov.

Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. The Palisades renewal application is

online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/palisades.html , and it is

available for public view at the South Haven Memorial Library, 314 Broadway, South Haven, Mich.

###
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Robert P.Akins, Chief Executive Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the“Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               TheRegistrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respectsthe results of operations of the Registrant for the periods covered by theReport and the Registrant’s financial condition as of the end of those periods.

 
| Date:  May 6, 2004 |   |   | /s/Robert  P. Akins                       |   |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   |   | Robert  P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cymer, Inc.and will be retained by Cymer, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Destination Maternity Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Judd P. Tirnauer, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ JUDD P. TIRNAUER                           
|Judd P. Tirnauer                               
|Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|May 10, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jean Paul Roy

------------------------





Jean Paul Roy

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 2, 2005
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Getty Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 12, 2004



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/S/  JONATHAN D. KLEIN                                  
|Jonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief
Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION I, Gregory S. Madar, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures; and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operations of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 10, 2005By:
    
    /s/ Gregory S. MadarGregory S. MadarSVP, Treasurer & Assistant Secretary(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-25-1997
<CASH>                                           9,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                       142
<INVENTORY>                                     38,354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,734
<PP&E>                                          78,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,087
<BONDS>                                        248,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,941)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,960
<SALES>                                        111,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,086
<CGS>                                           64,553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (388)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (52)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,841
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,529
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §549a. Review of navigation, flood control, and water supply projects

The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized to review the operation of projects the construction of which has been completed and which were constructed by the Corps of Engineers in the interest of navigation, flood control, water supply, and related purposes, when found advisable due 1 the significantly changed physical or economic conditions, and to report thereon to Congress with recommendations on the advisability of modifying the structures or their operation, and for improving the quality of the environment in the overall public interest.

(Pub. L. 91–611, title II, §216, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1830.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from Pub. L. 91–611, popularly known as the "Flood Control Act of 1970".

1 So in original. Probably should be "due to".