alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees from the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, NIOSH, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority:42 U.S.C. 7384q(b). 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                        (14)(C).                    

                    On October 18, 2018, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                    (14)(C), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:                

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors or subcontractors who worked in any area at the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, during the period from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 1996, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.

This designation became effective on October 18, 2018. Therefore, beginning on November 17, 2018, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the SEC.

Frank J. Hearl,

Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2018-27135 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.40

                       AMENDMENT TO PROCESSOR AGREEMENT

This Amendment to that certain Processor Agreement dated May 1, 2000 between
Deluxe Financial Services, Inc. ("Deluxe") and eFunds Corporation ("eFunds")
(the "Processor Agreement") is made effective as of the May 1, 2000.

WHEREAS, Deluxe and eFunds have entered into the Processor Agreement in order to
provide for eFunds to obtain certain services from Deluxe; and

WHEREAS, eFunds and Deluxe wish to clarify and amend certain provisions of the
Processor Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Processor Agreement as follows:

1.  The following sentence shall be added at the end of the provisions labeled
    "Pricing" in Exhibit 1 to the Processor Agreement entitled "Statement of
    Work":

       "eFunds shall commence payment to Deluxe for the Services described in
       this Statement of Work on and as of July 1, 2000."

2.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the Processor Agreement shall remain in
    full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of its
effective date.


Deluxe Financial Service, Inc.                  eFunds Corporation

By: /s/ Ronald E. Eilers                 By: /s/ Paul H. Bristow
    ------------------------                 ------------------------

Title: President                         Title: EVP & CEO
       ---------------------                    ---------------------
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1451

To prohibit high school and college sports gambling in all States including 

States where such gambling was permitted prior to 1991. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2003

Mr. OSBORNE (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. KIND, Mr. WAMP, 

Mr. SHAYS, Mr. WOLF, Mr. GOODE, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. BARTLETT

of Maryland, Mr. WICKER, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. GORDON, Mr. LINDER, Mr. 

WALSH, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

BLUMENAUER, Mr. ETHERIDGE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. EHLERS, and Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To prohibit high school and college sports gambling in all 

States including States where such gambling was permitted prior to 1991.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Athlete Pro5 tection Act’’. 
2

•HR 1451 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

2 Section 3704 of title 28, United States Code, is 

3 amended—

4 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Section’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (c), sec6 tion’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(c)(1) Section 3702 shall apply to a lottery, sweep9 stakes or other betting, gambling, or wagering scheme 

10 based, directly or indirectly, on—

11 ‘‘(A)(i) one or more competitive games in 

12 which high school or college athletes participate; 

13 or 

14 ‘‘(ii) one or more performances of 

15 high school or college athletes in competi16 tive games; or 

17 ‘‘(B) one or more competitive games at the 

18 Summer or Winter Olympics. 

19 ‘‘(2) In this section—

20 ‘‘(A) the term ‘high school’ has the meaning 

21 given the term ‘secondary school’ in section 14102 

22 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

23 1965; and 

24 ‘‘(B) the term ‘college’ has the meaning given 

25 the term ‘institution of higher education’ in section 

26 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965.’’. 
3

•HR 1451 IH 

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendments made by section 2 shall take effect 

3 on the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment 

4 of this Act.

Æ
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000586 31-JAN-2014 08:39 AM
### §736. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section, R.S. §4676; acts June 10, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538; Aug. 16, 1937, ch. 665, §1, 50 Stat. 666, related to placement of markers over sunken craft and other obstructions. See section 545 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
#### In the Matter of Alice Stabler et al., as Substituted Trustees under the Will of Louise Connors, Deceased, Appellants-Respondents. Knox Studios, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants; Max Tompkins et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

*Per Curiam.*

By adopting the amounts paid for wages and real estate taxes during the year preceding the application, in its computation of reasonable rents, the court allowed inadequate amounts for those purposes. While past experience in the maintenance and operation of business property is to be given great weight, it is nevertheless only a guide as to the probable cost in the future. Where it appears that the cost of allowable items of expense has increased or decreased, such evidence is to be considered and given effect.

*800In this ease it is clearly shown that pay roll expenses increased over what had been paid during the preceding year by $4,654.81, and real estate taxes by $876.81. These increases are sufficiently established by the evidence so as to warrant their allowance in full. We do not consider the $500 appraisal fee to be a proper item to be taken into account in the determination of a reasonable rental and should be eliminated. The net result obtained after making the foregoing adjustments is an increase of $5,031.62 in the total reasonable rentals fixed by the court, of which $1,968.62 is chargeable to the space occupied by the tenants who are parties to this proceeding. The latter amount is to be apportioned, and added to the rentals fixed by the court for the space of the respective tenants, in the same proportion as the rentals fixed by the court for their respective space bears to the total rental found by the court for all of their space.

The order appealed from should, therefore, he modified accordingly and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the petitioners.

Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with opinion and, as so modified affirmed, with costs to the petitioner. Settle order on notice. [See *post,*p. 922.]
#### Ellen Mannion, as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Mannion, Deceased, Respondent, v. General Baking Company, Appellant.

Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Taylor, J., dissent and vote to affirm, with the following memorandum: The admission on cross-examination of the excluded proof claimed to bear upon the credibility of plaintiff’s witnesses Bigazzi might well have been illegally prejudicial to plaintiff. Discretion vested in the trial court to exclude it. That such discretion *1029was properly exercised appears when we consider the statement of defendant’s counsel at folios 97 to 99 of the record, which statement is, in effect, an offer of proof, and indicates clearly the prejudice to plaintiff which would have resulted from the admission of the proof by the learned Trial Justice.
§ 210.78 Notice of enforcement action to Government agencies. ( a ) *Consultation.* The Commission may consult with or seek information from any Government agency when taking any action under this subpart.
( b ) *Notification of Treasury.* The Commission shall notify the Secretary of the Treasury of any action under this subpart that results in a permanent or temporary exclusion of articles from entry, or the revocation of an order to such effect, or the issuance of an order compelling seizure and forfeiture of imported articles.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-004 April 25, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with TXU Energy officials on May 1, to

discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Comanche Peak nuclear plant

during 2005.

The 6 p.m. meeting at the Somervell County Expo Center, 202 Bo Gibbs Blvd., Glen

Rose, Texas, is open to public observation. Before the session ends, NRC staff will be available

to answer questions on the plant’s safety performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring

safe plant operation.

“Each year, the NRC assesses the performance of all of the nation’s commercial nuclear

power plants,” said Region IV Administrator Bruce S. Mallett. “The meeting gives us an

opportunity to discuss our findings with the company, local officials and members of the public.

We look forward to meeting with members of the community and answering any questions they

may have about our oversight.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during 2005 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on

the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/cp_2005q4.pdf .

Overall, Comanche Peak operated safely during the period. The NRC uses color-coded

inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear power plant performance. The

colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the

safety significance of the issues involved. Because all of the inspection findings and performance

indicators for the plant during the last quarter of 2005 were determined to be “green,” Comanche

Peak will receive a baseline (or routine) level of inspections during the upcoming assessment
period. In addition, the NRC staff will perform steam generator and reactor vessel head

replacement inspections.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from the Region IV Office in Arlington, Texas. Among the areas of

plant operations to be inspected during the next year by NRC specialists are emergency

preparedness and radiological safety.

Current performance information for Comanche Peak Unit 1 is available on the NRC web

site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP1/cp1_chart.html .

Current performance information for Comanche Peak Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CP2/cp2_chart.html .

###
#### § 2470.1 Purpose.

The regulations contained in this subchapter are intended to implement the provisions of section 7119 of title 5 and, where applicable, section 431 of title 3 of the United States Code. They prescribe procedures and methods which the Federal Service Impasses Panel may utilize in the resolution of negotiation impasses when voluntary arrangements, including the services of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service or any other third-party meditation, fail to resolve the disputes. It is the policy of the Panel to encourage labor and management to resolve disputes on terms that are mutually agreeable at any stage of the Panel's procedures.

[63 FR 46159, Aug. 31, 1998]
§ 2471.10 Duties of each party following receipt of recommendations. ( a ) Within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of a report containing recommendations of the Panel or its designated representative, each party shall, after conferring with the other, either: ( 1 ) Accept the recommendations and so notify the Executive Director; or
( 2 ) Reach a settlement of all unresolved issues and submit a written settlement statement to the Executive Director; or
( 3 ) Submit a written statement to the Executive Director setting forth the reasons for not accepting the recommendations and for not reaching a settlement of all unresolved issues.
( b ) A reasonable extension of time may be authorized by the Executive Director for good cause shown when requested in writing by either party prior to the expiration of the time limits.
[45 FR 3520, Jan. 17, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 19694, May 2, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1596 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1596

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   2318 Woodson Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Timothy Michael 
                     Gaffney Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2318 
Woodson Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Timothy Michael Gaffney Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Timothy Michael Gaffney Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 330.611 Establishing CTAP selection priority. ( a ) CTAP selection priority for a specific agency vacancy begins when: ( 1 ) The CTAP eligible submits all required application materials, including proof of eligibility, within agency-established timeframes; and,
( 2 ) The agency determines the eligible is well-qualified for the vacancy.
( b ) An agency may allow CTAP eligible employees to become CTAP selection priority candidates for positions in other local commuting areas only if there are no CTAP selection priority candidates within the local commuting area of the vacancy.
( c ) An agency may deny future CTAP selection priority for agency positions if the CTAP eligible declines an offer of permanent appointment at any grade level (whether it is a competitive or excepted appointment).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7036

LATRON DUPREE BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00196-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latron Dupree Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Latron Dupree Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 2634.1008 Public access to a Certificate of Divestiture.

A Certificate of Divestiture issued pursuant to the provisions of this subpart is available to the public in accordance with the rules of § 2634.603.
### §629. Contract for hire of dredging plant

Whenever it shall become, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army, necessary or desirable to hire a dredging plant or plants for the performance of any of the public work carried on under his direction the said Secretary may, in his discretion, agree for the same, either in the manner customary on March 2, 1907, or on the basis of an equitable reimbursement for deterioration of plant when in use by the Government, and a reasonable percentage of the total cost of the work.

(Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2509, §5, 34 Stat. 1119; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1907.

The part of the original text omitted here repealed act Apr. 28, 1904, ch. 1761, §4, 33 Stat. 452.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
### §3406. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to carry out this subchapter $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2028 1

(Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12006, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1419; Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIII, §10305(g), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3974.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 substituted "this subchapter $60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2023 through 2028" for "this subchapter—" and struck out pars. (1) to (7) which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2009 through 2015.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.903 Effecting a detail or transfer. ( a ) *Authority to approve.* The head of an agency may enter into written agreements with the Commission for the detail or voluntary transfer, for set periods of time, of agency employees to the Commission in accordance with section 3643 of title 22, United States Code, and this subpart. Refusal by the head of the agency to agree to a detail or transfer, or extension of detail or transfer, is not reviewable by the Office of Personnel Management or appealable.
( b ) *Employee notice.* The agency will furnish the employee with a copy of the written agreement which must contain a statement of the time limits for exercising reemployment rights and the conditions of reemployment.