alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-037 October, 19, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC TO MEET WITH NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE INITIATIVES AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of

Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) on Oct. 24 to discuss performance initiatives at the

Cooper Nuclear Station. The plant is located near Brownville, Neb.

The meeting will be held at 4 p.m. at the Brownville Concert Hall, located at Atlantic

Avenue and Second Street. Topics to be discussed include problem identification and resolution,

equipment reliability, and human performance initiatives. Before the session is adjourned,

members of the NRC staff will be available for comments and questions from the public. 

Following performance problems, Cooper embarked on a self-improvement program in

early 2003. In January, NRC concluded that improvements had been made in plant performance,

but said it would continue to monitor the effectiveness of long-term improvement initiatives. 

This meeting is a part of NRC’s effort to monitor progress at Cooper Nuclear Station.

 

 ###
### §7110. Use of joint financing provisions for Federal-State assisted projects

Under regulations prescribed by the President, the head of an executive agency may make an agreement with a State to extend the benefits of this chapter to a project involving assistance from at least one executive agency and at least one State agency. The agreement may include arrangements to process requests or administer assistance on a joint basis.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1039.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7110 | 42:4259. | Dec. 5, 1974, Pub. L. 93–510, §10, 88 Stat. 1607. |

In this section, the words "as appropriate" are omitted as surplus. The words "to process requests or administer assistance" are substituted for "for the processing of requests for, or the administration of, assistance to such projects" to eliminate unnecessary words.
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)I, Jean Paul Roy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeoGlobal Resources Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recentfiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thesmall business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: May 11, 2006 /s/ Jean Paul Roy     Jean Paul Roy    President and Chief Executive Officer  
Page 37
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Notice of Resource Advisory Committee, Sundance, Wyoming, USDA Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Black Hills National Forests' Crook County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Monday, November 15, 2004 in Sundance, Wyoming for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on November 15, begins at 6:30 p.m., at the USFS Bearlodge Ranger District office, 121 South 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming. Agenda topics will include a review of previously presented project proposals, a presentation of any new project proposals and updates on previously funded projects. A public forum will begin at 8:30 p.m. (MT).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Kozel, Bearlodge District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer at (307) 283-1361.

Dated: October 26, 2004.

Steve Kozel,

District Ranger, Bearlodge Ranger District.

[FR Doc. 04-24509 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Argo-Tech Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ John S. GloverJohn S. GloverVice President and CFO
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-016 April 14, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF SCHEDULES PUBLIC MEETING FOR APRIL 20 TO DISCUSS 

LICENSE RENEWAL PROCESS FOR MONTICELLO NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold a public meeting on Wednesday,

April 20, in Monticello, Minn., to discuss how the agency will review the application from Nuclear

Management Company to renew the operating license for the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant. 

The public information session will describe the NRC’s license renewal process and how the

public can participate.

The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the Monticello Community Center, Mississippi Room, 505

Walnut Street, Monticello. 

Nuclear Management Company submitted its application for license renewal on March 24. The

current license for the Monticello plant expires on Sept. 8, 2010. If approved, the plant’s NRC license

would be extended for 20 years.

A copy of the licensee renewal application is available for review at the Monticello Public

Library, 200 W. Sixth St., Monticello. The application is also available on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/monticello.html

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-098 August 23, 2004

NRC ISSUES POLICY STATEMENT ON ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing a policy statement to provide its

consolidated views on how it will treat environmental justice matters in agency regulatory and

licensing actions.

In the policy statement the NRC recognizes that the impact of the agency’s regulatory or

licensing actions on certain populations may be different from those on the general population due to a

community’s distinct cultural characteristics. The policy statement reflects the view that the

disproportionately high and adverse impacts of a proposed action that fall heavily on a particular

community call for close scrutiny under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

 In February 1994, President Clinton issued to all Federal agencies Executive Order 12898,

“Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income

Populations,” which directed them to make achieving environmental justice part of their mission by

identifying and addressing disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects

of their programs, policies and activities on minority and low-income populations.

Although independent agencies, such as the NRC, were only requested to comply with this

Executive Order, the agency in a letter to President Clinton indicated that it would endeavor to carry

out the measures set forth in the Order as part of its efforts to comply with NEPA.

A draft policy statement on this subject was issued for public comment on November 5, 2003. 

No substantive changes were made as a result of the comments received. A copy of the final statement

will be published in the Federal Register shortly.

###
_____________________________________________________________________________________________ 2012 H Street, Suite 101 | Sacramento, CA 95811 | P.916.446.7883 | F.916.446.7089 | www.calasiancc.org May	12,	2015

The	Honorable	Anthony	R.	Foxx Secretary	of	Transportation US	Department	of	Transportation 1200	New	Jersey	Avenue	SE Washington,	DC	20590

Dear	Secretary	Foxx:

The California	Asian	Pacific	Chamber	of	Commerce	(CalAsian	Chamber)	represents	the	interests	of	nearly 600,000	Asian	Pacific	Islander	(API)	owned	businesses	in	the	State	of	California	with	a	combined	revenue of	over	$181	billion.		We	advocate	for	policies,	leg islation	and	programs	that	will	help	California’s	API

owned	businesses	community	reach	new	markets	and	provide	growth	opportunities.	As	an	organization, we	are	becoming	increasingly	concerned	about	the	impact	of	government	subsidies	and	other	unfair
benefi ts	that	have	been	provided	to	state

- owned	airlines	of	Qatar	and	the	United	Arab	Emirates	(UAE)
over	the	last	decade.

The	state

- owned	Gulf	airlines

– Qatar	Airways,	Etihad	Airways	and	Emirates	Airline

– have	collectively received	at	least	$42	billion	in	go vernment	subsidies	and	other	unfair	benefits	in	violation	of	U.S.	Open Skies	policy.	These	subsidies	are	contributing	to	excess	capacity,	which	draws	passengers	and	revenue from	U.S.	airlines.	If	these	subsidies	continue,	it	will	lead	to	service	cuts	and	u ltimately	American	job losses.	According	to	a	white	paper	released	by	the	Partnership	for	Open	&	Fair	Skies,	each	route	that	is lost	to	Qatar,	Etihad	or	Emirates	will	result	in	an	average	net	loss	of	over	800	good,	high

- paying	U.S. jobs.

The	CalAsian	Cham ber	urges	the	U.S.	government	to	open	consultations	with	Qatar	and	the	United	Arab Emirates	(UAE)	in	order	to	level	the	playing	field.	We	also	hope	that	the	U.S.	government	will immediately	freeze	the	introduction	of	new	passenger	service	by	the	gulf	carri ers	during	these
consultations.

Thank	you	for	your	consideration	of	this	matter.

Sincerely,

PAT	FONG	KUSHIDA
PRESIDENT	&	CEO
**Exhibit 12.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Janice Lee, certify that:1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F/A of hanarotelecomincorporated (the “Company”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 16, 2006        /s/ Janice Lee      Janice Lee  Chief Financial Officer
§ 2100.13 Specific exemptions. Subsection (k) of 5 U.S.C. 552a authorizes the AFRH to adopt rules designating eligible system of records as exempt from certain requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a. To be eligible for a specific exemption under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k), the pertinent records within a designated system must contain one or more of the following: ( a ) Investigative records compiled for law enforcement purposes. If this information has been used to deny someone a right however, the AFRH must release it unless doing so would reveal the identify of a confidential source ((k)(2) exemption).
( b ) Records used only for statistical, research, or other evaluation purposes, and which are not used to make decisions on the rights, benefits, or privileges of individuals, except as permitted by 13 U.S.C. 8 (Use of census data) ((k)(4) exemption).
( c ) Data compiled to determine suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal service, Federal contracts, or access to classified information. This information may be withheld only if disclosure would reveal the identity of a confidential source ((k)(5) exemption).
( d ) Test or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service, the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process ((k)(6) exemption).
#### William Wilson, Respondent, *v.*Justus Palmer, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

Judgment of affirmance on decision of General Term was perfected herein August 3, 1877, a copy thereof with notice of entry -was served August 7th. On application for retaxation of costs an order was granted August 30th striking out one item tif §1.25 ; it did not appear that the judgment was ever actually modified. An undertaking on appeal was filed and served August 30th, 1878; both the undertaking and notice described the judgment as entered. On motion to dismiss appeal, *held,*that as it was not perfected within one year from August 3, 1877, it was too late.

(Argued November 19, 1878;

decided November 26, 1878.)

Motion to dismiss appeal on the ground, among others, that the appeal was not taken and perfected in time.

The facts appear in the opinion.

*Theo. F. Jackson,*for motion.

The appeal from the judgment of the General Term was not perfected within the time required by law. (Code of Civil Procedure, § 1325; Code of Procedure, § 334; *Kelsey*v. *Campbell,*14 Abb., 368.)

*Justus Palmer,*opposed.

The appeal was perfected in time. (Old Code, § 331; New Code, § 1325; *Champion*v. *Plymouth Cong’l Soc.,*42 Barb., 441; *Sherman v. Wells,*14 How., 522.) It was not necessary that a copy of the undertaking should be served with the notice of appeal. *(Ryan*v. *Waull*, 63 N. Y., 57; Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 1326, 1327, 1334.) The appeal from the judgment brought up for review the right of plaintiff to costs. *(Hoe*v. *Sanborn,*3 Abb. [N. S.], 189; Code of Civil Procedure, §§ 1301, 1316.)

*Per Curiam.*

The only judgment entered in this action after the decision of the General Term was entered August 3, 1877, and notice thereof was given on the same day. That was a judgment of affirmance and for $96.99 costs. The *251notice of appeal and the undertaking describe that judgment, and no other. Ho other judgment was ever entered, and it does not appear that that judgment was ever canceled, or actually modified. It is true that the taxation of costs was corrected, by order of August 30, 1877, granted on motion for re-taxation by striking out the small sum of $1.25. The undertaking oil appeal was not filed or served until August 30, 1878. As the appeal was confessedly not perfected within one year from August third, it was too late. Ho other notice to limit the time of the appeal was needful. There is but one appeal, and that is from the judgment entered August third, and that must be dismissed, with costs.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Barnett Kadin, Appellant, v. J. Rich Steers, Inc., Respondent.

.Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.