alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frederick Seifter, etc., Respondent, v. American Bonding Company of Baltimore, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
### §1957. Relationship to Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act

Nothing in this chapter supersedes, or limits the authority of the Secretary of the Interior under, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 109–449, §8, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3339.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 109–449, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3333, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1951 of this title and Tables.

The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 345, 67 Stat. 462, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§1331 et seq.) of chapter 29 of Title 43, Public Lands. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1301 of Title 43 and Tables.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-049 August 18, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC SPECIAL INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW SHUTDOWN OF SALEM 1 PLANT

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has sent a special inspection team to the Salem 1

nuclear power plant to review the facility’s response to a July 29th shutdown. 

 At 1:30 p.m. on July 29, a breaker malfunctioned in a switchyard at the site, causing an

automatic trip of the Salem 1 reactor and the partial loss of off-site power to the Salem 1 and 2

units. (Nuclear power plants transmit power to the electrical grid but also receive power back

from the grid for operational purposes.) The Salem 1 electrical system did not respond as

expected, in that equipment did not reconnect to another off-site power supply that was still

available. However, emergency diesel generators started as designed and provided the necessary

power to key systems. An Unusual Event – the lowest of four levels of emergency classification

– was declared by plant operators in response to the event.

 The purpose of the special inspection will be to monitor and assess PSEG Nuclear’s rootcause evaluation of the event and corrective actions, independently evaluate the risk significance

and determine possible generic implications.

 Once the inspection is completed, the special inspection team will document its findings

and conclusions in a report that will be issued within 45 days of an exit meeting with plant

managers.

 ###
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov                                 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-118 August 28, 2005

NRC MONITORING APPROACH OF HURRICANE KATRINA;WATERFORD SHUTS DOWN

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sunday dispatched additional personnel to threenuclear power plants in Louisiana and Mississippi in response to the expected landfall Monday ofHurricane Katrina.  

One plant near New Orleans - Waterford - informed the NRC it shut down to ensure that allsafety precautions are in place ahead of the storm.

The NRC is monitoring the hurricane from operations centers in Arlington, Texas, and itsRockville, Md., headquarters.

"We are staying on top of the situation because protecting public health and safety isparamount," said Nils Diaz, chairman of the independent regulatory agency.

At the Waterford plant the major concern beyond winds was the storm surge, last predicted toapproach the top of an 18-foot levee on the Mississippi River.  Nuclear plants are very robuststructures designed to withstand winds in excess of those in Katrina and associated storm surges.  BothWaterford and the other plants have watertight doors at key safety systems.

All three plants the NRC was monitoring are owned by Entergy Nuclear.  The Waterford plantis about 20 miles west of New Orleans.  The River Bend plant is about 25 miles north-northwest ofBaton Rouge, La., and Grand Gulf is located 25 miles south of Vicksburg, Miss.

Waterford initially declared an "unusual event" because of the approach of the hurricane, andwill raise its level of preparedness on the NRC's four-step scale to an "alert" as winds reach hurricanestrength and to a "site area emergency" should winds exceed 110 mph.  The alert levels are specified inadvance precautionary plans dictated by the NRC.  The "site area emergency" classification isassociated with plant personnel safety.

The NRC will have to approve the restart of Waterford and any other plant that shuts down. Additionally, the Federal Emergency Management Agency will have to determine that evacuationroutes in the area are passable.

###
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 46413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18988]

[[Page 46413]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOD-2012-OS-0065]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 4, 2012.
    Title, Associated Forms and OMB Number: Confirmation of Request for 
Reasonable Accommodation; OMB Control Number 0704-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 20.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 20.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 Minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5 Hours.
    Needs And Uses: This information collection is necessary to obtain 
and records requests for reasonable accommodation, with the intent to 
measure and ensure Agency compliance with the Rehabilitation Act of 
1973, Public Law 93-112; Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, Public 
Law 102-569; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336; Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments of 2008, Public Law 
110-325.
    Affected Public: Individuals of households.
    Frequency: On Occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: July 13, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-18988 Filed 8-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 18, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 18, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0153. DALE ADAMS v. ASHLEY CLAXTON. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 16EV005072
1

Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

1 SE Third Avenue, Suite 2300, Miami, FL 33131 • Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurst.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 20-23407-CIV-SINGHAL/MCALILEY

15 OZ FRESH & HEALTHY FOOD LLC,

Individually and on behalf of all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v. 

UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON

KNOWN AS SYNDICATES AML 2001,

WBC 5886, MMX 2010, AND SKD 1897,

Defendants. 

_____________________________________/

NOTICE OF APPEAL

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff in the above-named case, 15 OZ FRESH & 

HEALTHY FOOD LLC, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, hereby 

appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit the “Order Granting 

Dismissal with Prejudice” entered on February 22, 2021 [DE 23].

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Stephen F. Rosenthal

Stephen F. Rosenthal, Esq. 

Florida Bar. No. 131458 

Steven C. Marks 

Florida Bar No. 516414

PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. 

SunTrust International Center 

One S.E. 3rd Avenue, Ste. 2300 

Miami, FL 33131 

srosenthal@podhurst.com 

smarks@podhurst.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 1:20-cv-23407-AHS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2021 Page 1 of 2
2

Podhurst Orseck, P.A.

1 SE Third Avenue, Suite 2300, Miami, FL 33131 • Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurst.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been served via transmission of 

Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on March 22, 2021 as filed with the Clerk of the 

Court using CM/ECF.

By: /s/ Stephen F. Rosenthal

Stephen F. Rosenthal

Case 1:20-cv-23407-AHS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/22/2021 Page 2 of 2
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents SECY-05-0070 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment For Calendar Year 2004 Accession Number: ML050630297 Date Released: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 Package Contents The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools. ML050630512 - SECY-05-0070 - Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2004 (15 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050630452 - SECY-05-0070 - Performance Indicator  Program Evaluation (9 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050660116 - SECY-05-0070 - Inspection Program Evaluation (4 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050630532 - SECY-05-0070 - Significance Determination Process Evaluation (5 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050630490 - SECY-05-0070 - Attachment 4 - Assessment Program Evaluation (5 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050630316 - SECY-05-0070 - Attachment 5 - Status of Implementation Issues (5 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050630534 - SECY-05-0070-Attachment 6 - Stakeholder Survey Results (13 page(s), 4/27/2005)
            ML050630524 - SECY-05-0070-Attachment 7 - Regulatory Impact Summary (5 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050660046 - SECY-05-0070 - Attachment 8 - ROP Resources (5 page(s), 4/25/2005)
            ML050660091 - SECY-05-0070 - Attachment 9 - Resident Inspector Demographics and Staffing (13 page(s), 4/25/2005)


Privacy Policy Site Disclaimer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 225

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1629

[Report No. 108–392] 

To clarify that the Upper Missouri River Breaks National Monument does 

not include within its boundaries any privately owned property, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2003

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To clarify that the Upper Missouri River Breaks National 

Monument does not include within its boundaries any 

privately owned property, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1629 RH 

1 SECTION 1. PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY EXCLUDED 

2 FROM MONUMENT. 

3 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

4 ‘‘Upper Missouri River Breaks Boundary Clarification 

5 Act’’. 

6 (b) PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY EXCLUDED FROM

7 MONUMENT.—

8 (1) PROPERTY CLARIFICATION.—The Upper 

9 Missouri River Breaks National Monument, estab10 lished by Presidential proclamation 7398 on January 

11 17, 2001, shall not include within its boundaries any 

12 privately owned property. 

13 (2) MAP.—The Secretary shall keep a map of 

14 the Monument reflecting the boundary clarification 

15 in paragraph (1) on file and available for public in16 spection in the appropriate offices of the Director of 

17 the Bureau of Land Management, Department of 

18 the Interior. 

Union Calendar No. 225

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1629

[Report No. 108–392] 

A BILL

To clarify that the Upper Missouri River Breaks 

National Monument does not include within its boundaries any privately owned property, and for other purposes. 

NOVEMBER 21, 2003

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
#### § 206.22 Definition applicable to subpart C.

For the purposes of this subpart, the term *surge* means a significant increase in imports over the trend for a recent representative base period.
### §28. Crum River; old channel at mouth, Delaware Bay

After the channel of the Crum River where the same empties into the Delaware River has been changed, diverted, and straightened under the authority given to Alba B. Johnson and Samuel M. Vauclain and the Baldwin Locomotive Works by Act July 27, 1916, chapter 260, the said Crum River, as so straightened, shall be a public navigable stream, and the course and channel of the said river, as it existed July 27, 1916, from the right-of-way of the Philadelphia and Reading Railway Company to the low-water line in the Delaware River shall be abandoned and vacated when the above-mentioned new channel shall have been completed to a depth of four feet at mean low water, with a bottom width of sixty-two feet and width of one hundred feet at mean low-water level: Provided, That the Government shall have such right, title, and interest in and to the bed of said new channel as will assure the public the right to the perpetual use of said channel for all the purposes of navigation and commerce.

(July 27, 1916, ch. 260, §1, 39 Stat. 393.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act July 27, 1916, chapter 260, referred to in text, is act July 27, 1916, ch. 260, 39 Stat. 393, which is classified to sections 7, 25, 28, 38, 424, and 648 to 650 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section is from a provision of section 1 of act July 27, 1916, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1916".

The portion of that section authorizing the changing, diverting, and straightening of the channel of the river has been omitted as temporary and executed.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30028 Conference Calendar

__________________ BENJAMIN SEMIEN, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN OF OPELOUSAS, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-94-2014

- - - - - - - - - - March 21, 1995
Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benjamin Semien, Jr., a resident of St. Landry Parish, Louisiana, filed a complaint alleging that his civil rights had been violated because the First Federal Savings & Loan of Opelousas, Louisiana, took his money and refused to cancel his mortgage. The district court dismissed the suit as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) because the sole defendant, First Federal Savings & Loan of Opelousas, is not a state actor asNo. 95-30028 -2-
required under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Resident Council of Allen Parkway Village v. U.S. Dep't of Housing and Urban Dev. , 980 F.2d 1043, 1050 (5th Cir.) (to obtain relief under § 1983 a plaintiff must prove that he was deprived of a right under the Constitution or laws of the U.S. and that the person depriving him of that right acted under color of state law), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 75 (1993). The district court also cautioned Semien about filing frivolous lawsuits. On appeal, Semien has not presented anything to show that this suit has any basis in federal law. Semien has not asserted that the savings and loan is a state actor, nor has he asserted any basis for diversity jurisdiction. The amount in controversy is at most $40,000. Semien is a resident of Louisiana and First Federal Savings & Loan of Opelousas apparently has its principal place of business in Louisiana. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) and (c). Semien's claim has no basis in law or in fact, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing it as frivolous. See Denton v. Hernandez , 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1733-34 (1992). Semien's appeal is without arguable merit and thus, frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Semien is cautioned that if he persists in filing frivolous actions, the full panoply of sanctions, including contempt of court, will be brought to bear. APPEAL DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-030 May 6, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC DAVIS-BESSE OVERSIGHT PANEL TO MEET MAY 13 IN OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission Davis-Besse oversight panel will meet with FirstEnergy

Nuclear Operating Company officials on Thursday, May 13, in Port Clinton, Ohio, to review recent

operating performance and NRC inspection activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant.

The plant resumed operation in March after a two-year shutdown to replace the reactor vessel

head and make other safety system and staff performance improvements.

The meeting will be held at 3 p.m. in the Lower Level of the Ottawa County Courthouse, 315

Madison Street, Port Clinton. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the meeting and

will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meeting is

adjourned. The staff will also be available after the meeting for informal discussions with the public.

The utility will discuss operating experience over the past month, and the NRC staff will

review recent inspection findings, including the around-the-clock inspections which were performed

during the plant’s startup activities.

A transcript of the oversight panel meeting will be posted in several weeks on the NRC's web

site - http://www.nrc.gov. Select "Davis-Besse/Reactor Vessel Head Degradation" from the Key

Topics menu.

The NRC oversight panel includes NRC managers and staff from offices in Lisle, Illinois;

Rockville, Maryland; and the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site.

# # # # #
PRIVATE LAW 107–1—JULY 17, 2001

Private Law 107–1

107th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Rita Mirembe Revell (a.k.a. Margaret Rita Mirembe).

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RITA MIREMBE

REVELL (A.K.A. MARGARET RITA MIREMBE).

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

1101 et seq.), Rita Mirembe Revell (a.k.a. Margaret Rita Mirembe)

shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to

the United States for permanent residence as of the date of enactment of this Act, upon payment of the required visa fees not

later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

(b) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—Upon the

granting of permanent residence to Rita Mirembe Revell (a.k.a.

Margaret Rita Mirembe), the Secretary of State shall instruct the

proper officer to reduce by the appropriate number, during the

current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant

visas that are made available to natives of the country of the

alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number

of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country

of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such Act.

Approved July 17, 2001.

July 17, 2001

[S. 560]
### §232. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(a), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, as added Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 595, §2, 49 Stat. 669, related to orders to helmsmen.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 24, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.