alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 06-0544
IN RE PETITION OF SONJA L.POSPISIL FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA V 

### AUG 0 4 2020

Gr ..:e.r1VN/00(.1

Coun Sonja L. Pospisil has petitioned this Court for reinstatementtadtiVestatus in the State Bar ofMontana. Pospisil was placed on inactive status in January 2020 for failing to comply with the Rules for Continuing Legal Education for the reporting year ending March 31,2019. Attached to the Petition is a letter from the State Bar stating that Pospisil has now completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year. The Petition states that Pospisil is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or omissions sanctionable under the Rules ofProfessional Conductwhile on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Sonja L.Pospisil for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. Upon payment ofany remaining dues,fees,and the state lidense tax to the State Bar ofMontana,Pospisil shall be reinstated. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this 

### -7 day ofAugust, 2020. 

# L

Asvg_05% 08/04/2020

Case Number: PR 06-05442
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Elder and Overton 

Argued at Richmond, Virginia 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 0271-97-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 JUNE 24, 1997 

CHAD EVERETT SPENCER 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON 

Wilford Taylor, Jr., Judge 

 Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney 

General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney 

General, on brief), for appellant. 

 J. Ashton Wray, Jr., for appellee. 

 The Commonwealth appeals from a pretrial order in the 

Circuit Court of the City of Hampton in which the trial judge 

granted a motion to suppress the evidence. For the reasons 

stated, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record in the 

cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no 

precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. 

 In an appeal by the Commonwealth, "we view the evidence in 

the light most favorable to [the defendant], the prevailing party 

below, and we grant all reasonable inferences fairly deducible 

from that evidence." Commonwealth v. Grimstead, 12 Va. App. 

1066, 1067, 407 S.E.2d 47, 48 (1991). According to the 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

defendant’s version of the encounter, the police officer asked 

for the driver’s identification and registration and returned to 

his cruiser. Only after he had come back to the car after 

checking the driver’s identification did he ask to see the 

appellant’s identification. 

 In certain cases, an officer during a traffic stop may make 

additional intrusions upon passengers’ personal liberties 

"pending completion of the stop." Maryland v. Wilson, 117 S. Ct. 

882, 886 (1997). In this case, however, the traffic stop was 

completed. The officer had investigated the traffic violation, 

checked the driver’s identification and registration, and 

returned the driver’s documents. Until that point, "[a]s a 

practical matter, the passengers are already stopped by virtue of 

the stop of the vehicle." Id. After that point, the stop is 

completed and an independent reason is needed to continue 

detaining the passengers. The trial judge specifically found no 

valid reason and upon reviewing the record, we agree. 

 Accordingly, the ruling below is affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
Exhibit 15.1

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts



|                                  |  |                      |  |                         |  |                 |   |  |                     
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | --------------- | - |  | --------------------
|Valuation an Qualifying Accounts  |  | Opening balanceThUS$ |  | Charged toExpensesThUS$ |  | DeductionsThUS$ |   |  | Closing balanceThUS$
|Deferred tax valuations allowance |  |                      |  |                         |  |                 |   |  |                     
|December 31, 2007                 |  | 15,302               |  | 4,482                   |  |                |   |  | 19,784              
|December 31, 2006                 |  | 10,988               |  | 4,314                   |  |                |   |  | 15,302              
|December 31, 2005                 |  | 10,803               |  | 185                     |  |                |   |  | 10,988              
|Allowance for bad debts           |  |                      |  |                         |  |                 |   |  |                     
|December 31, 2007                 |  | 28,364               |  | 7,244                   |  | (13,662         | ) |  | 21,946              
|December 31, 2006                 |  | 25,800               |  | 6,424                   |  | (3,860          | ) |  | 28,364              
|December 31, 2005                 |  | 25,250               |  | 5,763                   |  | (5,213          | ) |  | 25,800
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES:  Date of required notice: December 17, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 11, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 493 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2019-44, 
CP2019-47.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-27190 Filed 12-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
§ 293.106 Safeguarding information about individuals. ( a ) To ensure the security and confidentiality of personnel records, in whatever form, each agency shall establish administrative, technical, and physical controls to protect information in personnel records from unauthorized access, use, modification, destruction, or disclosure. As a minimum, these controls shall require that all persons whose official duties require access to and use of personnel records be responsible and accountable for safeguarding those records and for ensuring that the records are secured whenever they are not in use or under the direct control of authorized persons. Generally, personnel records should be held, processed, or stored only where facilities and conditions are adequate to prevent unauthorized access.
( b ) Personnel records must be stored in metal filing cabinets which are locked when the records are not in use, or in a secured room. Alternative storage facilities may be employed provided they furnish an equivalent or greater degree of security than these methods. Except for access by the data subject, only employees whose official duties require access shall be allowed to handle and use personnel records, in whatever form or media the records might appear. To the extent feasible, entry into personnel record storage areas shall be similarly limited. Documentation of the removal of records from storage areas must be kept so that adequate control procedures can be established to assure that removed records are returned on a timely basis.
( c ) Disposal and destruction of personnel records shall be in accordance with the General Record Schedule issued by the General Services Administration for the records or, alternatively, with Office or agency records control schedules approved by the National Archives and Records Service of the General Services Administration.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, WU Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 26, 2008 |  | /s/ WU Yuxiang
|                    |  | Name:          |  | WU Yuxiang             
|                    |  | Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### §§ 2416.141-2416.148 [Reserved]
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 20

- 00034

- CR

ALLEN LATOI STORY , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011

- 2499

- C1

S E C O N D A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

On February 26, 2020, this Court issued an abatement orde r , abat ing this cause to
the trial court for the parties to create a record that is capab le of being reviewed. The trial
court was ordered to hold a hearing to receive certain evidence within 35 days of the date

of t he abatement order. The trial court clerk was ordered to include in the clerk’s record , due May 5, 2020, any additional documen ts designated by the parties for the appellateStory v. State Page 2

record and any additional orders or findings of the trial court. The court reporter was
ordered to file a reporter’s record of the hearing with the additional evidence, if any, by
May 5, 2020.

The trial court reques t s an extension of the deadlines in th e February 26, 2020

abatement order until 30 days after the expiration of Governor Greg Abbott’s recent
emergency declaration. We reinstate this appeal to rule on the trial court’s request . We
grant the request

. Accordingly, we again abate this cause to the trial court for the parties to create a
record that is capable of being reviewed , pursuant to th is Court’s February 26, 2020

abatement order . However, the deadlines in the February 26, 2020 abatemen t order are

extended as follows

.
The trial court is ORDERED to hold the hearing b y June 1 5 , 2020 . The trial court

clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing any additional
documents designated by the parties for the appellate record and any additional orders
or findings of the trial court by Ju ly 15 , 2020 . The court reporter is ORDERED to file a
reporter’s record of the hearing with the additional evidence, if any, by Ju ly 15 , 2020.
The appellant’s brief will then be due 30 days after this Court has received both
the clerk’s record and reporter’s record and has reinstated this appeal.

PER CURIAMStory v. State Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justic e Neill Appeal abated Order issued and filed April 17, 2020 RWR
#### § 250.102 Delegated authorities.

OPM may delegate its authority, including authority for competitive examinations, to agencies, under 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2), through a delegation agreement. The delegation agreement developed with the agency must specify the conditions for applying the delegated authorities. The agreement must also set minimum standards of performance and describe the system of oversight by which the agency and OPM will monitor the use of each delegated authority.
EXHIBIT 4.13

NanoSignal Corp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 560
Las Vegas, NV 89109

                                                               February 17, 2004

Re:      S-8 Payment under terms of Written
         Contract - Director and President

Dear Dr. Lawrence Madoff:

This shall  confirm our  agreement to issue to you S-8 shares under the terms of
your written employment  contract with the Company for all services rendered and
which are due for the months January 2004 through March 2004 in your capacity as
President and Director.

The compensation due is equivalent to FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND (400,000) shares
of common stock to be issued to

                               Dr. Lawrence Madoff

Please confirm your  acceptance of these terms below as indicated.  Your telefax
copy  should  be sent to us with  the  original  signed  copy  delivered  to our
corporate offices at your earliest convenience.


Very truly yours,

ANNALIE GALICIA

By: /s/ Annalie Galacia
    Annalie Galicia, Secretary-Treasurer

AG:jd


Accepted and Agreed to

Dr. LAWRENCE MADOFF

By: /s/ Dr. Lawrence Madoff                Dated: February 17, 2004
    Dr. Lawrence Madoff
§ 122.33 Place of first landing. ( a ) The first landing of an aircraft entering the United States from a foreign area will be: ( 1 ) At a designated international airport (see § 122.13), provided that permission to land has not been denied pursuant to § 122.12(c);
( 2 ) At a landing rights airport if permission to land has been granted (see § 122.14); or
( 3 ) At a designated user fee airport if permission to land has been granted (see § 122.15).
( b ) Permission to land at a landing rights airport or user fee airport is not required for an emergency or forced landing (see § 122.35).
[T.D. 92-90, 57 FR 43397, Sept. 21, 1992, as amended by CBP Dec. 03-32, 68 FR 68170, Dec. 5, 2003]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-003 January 19, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC, CONSTELLATION TO DISCUSS LICENSE RENEWAL INSPECTION

CONDUCTED AT NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 The results of a Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection of the aging management

program for Units 1 and 2 of the Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant will be discussed on Thursday,

Jan. 26, at a meeting between NRC officials and the facility’s management. The Aging Management

Program Team Inspection is part of an ongoing NRC review of a license renewal application for the

plant, which is located in Scriba, N.Y., and operated by Constellation Generation Group.

 The meeting is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. at the Town of Scriba Assembly Hall, 42

Creamery Road in Oswego, N.Y. Members of the public are invited to observe and will have an

opportunity to pose questions to NRC officials after the business portion but before the meeting is

adjourned.

 In May 2004, Constellation applied to the NRC for a 20-year extension of the operating

licenses for the Nine Mile Point units. NRC reviews of license renewal applications usually take about

22 months if there is no hearing involved and about 30 months if there is a hearing. However, in the

case of Nine Mile Point, the NRC staff announced in March 2005 that Constellation had requested a

90-day grace period to allow the company to address issues involving information provided in the

plant’s application. Those issues were resolved and the company submitted an amended license

renewal application, with the NRC staff review resuming in July 2005.

 One important aspect of the NRC license renewal process is to ensure that a plant manages

the effects of aging equipment through an effective monitoring and maintenance program. Such a

program is necessary to permit safe operation for an additional 20 years beyond its initial license period

of 40 years.

 The current operating license for Nine Mile Point 1 is due to expire on Aug. 22, 2009, while

the current operating license for Nine Mile Point 2 is scheduled to terminate on Oct. 31, 2026.

 A copy of the Nine Mile Point license renewal application is available via the NRC’s web

site at: www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/nine-mile-pt.html . Additional 
information about the license renewal process is available at: 

www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html .

 #
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24706]



[[Page 64581]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1558-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1558-DR), dated September 20, 
2004, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 28, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of West Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 20, 2004: Logan County for Individual 
Assistance (already designated for public assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, 
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, 
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-24706 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §6651. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–94, div. E, title II, §212(a)(3)(G), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2776

Section, Pub. L. 100–202, §101(i) [title I, §2(a)], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–290, 1329–294, related to compensation of Chaplain of Senate.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on the later of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2020, or the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after Dec. 20, 2019, see section 212(c) of Pub. L. 116–94, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 282b of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSupersonic STOVL ejector aircraft from a propulsion point of viewA baseline supersonic STOVL ejector aircraft, its propulsion and typical operating modes is described, and important propulsion parameters are identified. Then a number of propulsion system changes are evaluated for improvement of the lift-off performance aft deflection of the ejector jet and heating of the ejector primary air either by burning or using the hot engine core flow. The possibility for cooling the footprint is illustrated for mixing or interchanging the fan and core flows, and in use of a core flow ejector. The application of a new engine concept the turbine bypass engine plus a turbocompressor to supply the ejector primary air, and thrust during takeoff combat are presented.Document ID19840016513Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLuidens, R. W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Plencner, R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Haller, W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Glassman, A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83641E-2084NAS 1.15:83641Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion Conf.Location: Cincinnati, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 11, 1984End Date: June 13, 1984Sponsors:AIAA,SAE,ASMEAccession Number84N24581Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-40-82Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840016513.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-0306-182  -017   -CV

IN RE 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.InN rReE AdDvVeEnNtTiIsStT HeEaAlLtThH SyYsStTeEmMsS/SuUnNbBeElLtT, InNcC. 

RELATOR  	RELATOR

dD/bB/aA HuUgGuUlLeEyY MeEmMoOrRiIaAlL MeEdDiIcCaAlL CeEnNtTeErR	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	CORcorrCORRECTED MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered rrRrelator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for remergecyncy stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay are is denied.

	Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let eEexecution issue.

								____________________________

PER CURIAM								ANNNE GARDENER 

							JUSTICE

PANEL AA: GarARDNER, J. ;  0000CAYCE, C.J.; AGARDNER, J. and DUAAUPHINOT, JJ.::	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

cCayACYCYCE, CL..J., would grant relatemergrelator’s motion for emergency stay and request a responsetoor’s motion not participating.

DELIVERED: January 21, 2003 May 25, 2006