alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                                     PLACE OF INCORPORATION
----                                                     ----------------------
<S>                                                      <C>
Hermes Europe Railtel B.V.                               Holland
Hermes Europe Railtel Holdings B.V.                      Holland
HER Network Services B.V.B.A                             Belgium
Hermes Europe Railtel (US) Inc.                          Delaware
Hermes Europe Railtel (Spain) S.L.                       Spain
Hermes Europe Railtel (Switzerland) GmbH                 Switzerland
Hermes Europe Railtel (Ireland) Ltd.                     Ireland
Hermes Europe Railtel (Network) Ltd.                     Ireland
Hermes Europe Railtel (Germany) GmbH                     Germany
Hermes Europe Railtel (France) Sarl                      France
Hermes Europe Railtel (Italy) s.r.l.                     Italy
Hermes Europe Railtel (Denmark) ApS                      Denmark
HER (Sweden) AB                                          Sweden
Hermes Europe Railtel (UK) Limited                       United Kingdom
Ebone A/S                                                Denmark
</TABLE>
### §§731, 732. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section 731, acts Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 299, §1, 35 Stat. 972; June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538, related to lease of sites for temporary lights. See section 501 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

Section 732, acts Aug. 28, 1916, ch. 414, §2, 39 Stat. 538; July 11, 1941, ch. 290, §1, 55 Stat. 584, related to exchange of right-of-way pertaining to Coast Guard. See section 501 of Title 14.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
ONE COMMERCE SQUARE, 40 SOUTH MAIN ST., MEMPHIS, TN 38103 

November 26, 2012 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Re: Docket No. FAA-2002-13930. 

Dear, Sir / Madam: 

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14CFR) § 11.61, Pinnacle 

Airlines, Inc., REXA-257A, petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 

7504 E to 7504 F, Docket FAA-2002-13930. 

This extension will allow Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. continuation of relief exemption from (14 

CFR) § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) by allowing substitution of a qualified and authorized check 

airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in 

command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during 

at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing. 

Approval of this Exemption for Pinnacle Airlines will benefit the public good by improving 

the reliability of air service for many communities Pinnacle Airlines serves. Extending this 

Exemption will not adversely affect safety, because it will not change the criteria for 

observing a qualifying Pilot in Command. The conditions provided in Exemption 7504E 

and subsequent revisions will continue to ensure the proper use of this authority. Extending 

this exemption, if granted, would have no adverse impact on the interests of the aircraft 

operators or on government agencies. 

Thank you for your consideration of our request. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 

901-800-0054 if you have any questions 

Respectfully submitted, 

David Wilson 

Director, Flight Operations
§ 2423.21 Motions procedure. ( a ) *General requirements.* All motions, except those made during a prehearing conference or hearing, shall be in writing. Motions for an extension of time, postponement of a hearing, or any other procedural ruling shall include a statement of the position of the other parties on the motion. All written motions and responses in subparts B, C, or D of this part shall satisfy the filing and service requirements of part 2429 of this subchapter.
( b ) *Motions made to the Administrative Law Judge.* Prehearing motions and motions made at the hearing shall be filed with the Administrative Law Judge. Unless otherwise specified in subparts B or C of this part, or otherwise directed or approved by the Administrative Law Judge: ( 1 ) Prehearing motions shall be filed at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and responses shall be filed within 5 days after the date of service of the motion;
( 2 ) Responses to motions made during the hearing shall be filed prior to the close of hearing;
( 3 ) Posthearing motions shall be filed within 10 days after the date the hearing closes, and responses shall be filed within 5 days after the date of service of the motion; and
( 4 ) Motions to correct the transcript shall be filed with the Administrative Law Judge within 10 days after receipt of the transcript, and responses shall be filed within 5 days after the date of service of the motion.
( c ) *Post-transmission motions.* After the case has been transmitted to the Authority, motions shall be filed with the Authority. Responses shall be filed within 5 days after the date of service of the motion.
( d ) *Interlocutory appeals.* Motions for an interlocutory appeal of any ruling and responses shall be filed in accordance with this section and § 2423.31(c).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1630 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                      October 10, 2004.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1630) entitled ``An Act to revise the boundary of the Petrified Forest 
National Park in the State of Arizona, and for other purposes.'', do 
pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            On page 2, line 9, strike ``June'' and insert ``July''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1630

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
### §556. Printing reports generally

The Secretary of the Army shall cause the manuscript of the annual report of the Chief of Engineers and subordinate engineers, relating to the improvement of rivers and harbors, and the report of the Mississippi River Commission to be placed in the hands of the Director of the Government Publishing Office on or before the 15th day of October in each year, and the Director of the Government Publishing Office shall cause said reports to be printed with an accurate and comprehensive index thereof, on or before the first Monday in December in each year, for the use of Congress.

All reports on examinations and surveys which may be prepared during the recess of Congress shall, in the discretion of the Secretary of the Army, be printed by the Director of the Government Publishing Office as documents of the following session of Congress.

(Aug. 11, 1888, ch. 860, §8, 25 Stat. 424; June 13, 1902, ch. 1079, §1, 32 Stat. 367; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 144, §3, 37 Stat. 826; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(d), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The first paragraph of this section is from act Aug. 11, 1888, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act".

The Mississippi River Commission was created by act June 28, 1879, set out as sections 641, 642, 644, 646, and 647 of this title.

The words "and Missouri" which appeared in the original text after "Mississippi" were superseded by the abolition of the Missouri River Commission by act June 13, 1902, ch. 1079, §1, 32 Stat. 367.

The second paragraph of this section is from the last paragraph of section 3 of act Mar. 4, 1913, which superseded a similar provision of act July 25, 1912, ch. 253, 37 Stat. 231. Other parts of said section 3 are set out in section 545 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Director of the Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Public Printer" in text on authority of section 1301(d) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### Compilation and Printing of Laws

Act June 5, 1920, ch. 252, §6, 41 Stat. 1014, as amended by act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 467, §4, 43 Stat. 1190, provided for compilation and printing of laws relating to improvement of rivers and harbors, passed between Mar. 4, 1913, until and including laws of second session of Sixty-eighth Congress.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0226 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-20-22) Submitted by the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District

Accession Number: ML030980839

Date Released: Monday, January 31, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML043220026 - SECY-04-0226 - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-20-22) Submitted by the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (9 page(s), 11/30/2004)
    - ML042940521 - SECY-04-0226Atch 1 - S. Chilk, W. Schatz Ltr. re: Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District Petition Dated August 2, 1993 (Attachment 1) (2 page(s), 8/2/1993)
    - ML043220047 - SECY-04-0226 Atch 2 - Federal Register Notice - Denial of Petition for Rulemaking - (PRM-20-22) Submitted by Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (17 page(s), 11/30/2004)
    - ML043220052 - SECY-04-0226Atch 3 - W. Schatz, A. Vietti-Cook Ltr. to the Petitioner re: Denial of Petition for Rulemaking (PRM-20/22) Submitted by the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (4 page(s), 11/10/2004)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §891e–1. Shipyards located outside of the United States

On and after December 26, 2007, none of the funds made available in this Act or any other Act may be used for the construction, repair (other than emergency repair), overhaul, conversion, or modernization of vessels for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in shipyards located outside of the United States.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. B, title V, §506, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1925.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is div. B of Pub. L. 110–161, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1884, known as the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, and not as part of the NOAA Fleet Modernization Act which comprises this subchapter.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—RURAL CRIME
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63569-63570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Notice of Rate for Use in Federal Debt Collection and Discount 
and Rebate Evaluation

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of rate for use in Federal debt collection and discount 
and rebate evaluation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 11 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as 
amended

[[Page 63570]]

(31 U.S.C. 3717), the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for 
computing and publishing the percentage rate to be used in assessing 
interest charges for outstanding debts owed to the Government. 
Treasury's Cash Management Requirements (1 TFM 6-8000) prescribe use of 
this rate by agencies as a comparison point in evaluating the cost-
effectiveness of a cash discount. In addition, 5 CFR 1315.8 of the 
Prompt Payment rule on ``Rebates'' requires that this rate be used in 
determining when agencies should pay purchase card invoices when the 
card issuer offers a rebate. Notice is hereby given that the applicable 
rate is 1.00 percent for calendar year 2005.

DATES: The rate will be in effect for the period beginning on January 
1, 2005, and ending on December 31, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries should be directed to the 
Agency Enterprise Solutions Division, Financial Management Service, 
Department of the Treasury, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20227 
(telephone: (202) 874-6650).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rate reflects the current value of funds 
to the Treasury for use in connection with Federal Cash Management 
systems and is based on investment rates set for purposes of Pub. L. 
95-147, 91 Stat. 1227. Computed each year by averaging Treasury Tax and 
Loan (TT&L) investment rates for the 12-month period ending every 
September 30, rounded to the nearest whole percentage, for 
applicability effective each January 1, the rate is subject to 
quarterly revisions if the annual average, on a moving basis, changes 
by 2 percentage points. The rate in effect for the calendar year 2005 
reflects the average investment rates for the 12-month period that 
ended September 30, 2004.

    Dated: October 28, 2004.
Gary Grippo,
Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance.
[FR Doc. 04-24495 Filed 10-29-04; 11:40 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
#### Lori A. MOSBY *v.*OFFICE of PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT (of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct)

04-241

156 S.W.3d 253

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered March 25, 2004

*Lori A Mosby, pro se.*

No response.

Per Curiam.

On October 27, 2003, the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, Panel B, reprimanded Lori A. Mosby for unprofessional conduct, assessed a fine of $2,500, ordered her to pay costs of $50, and ordered her to attend two additional “ethics” hours of continuing legal education, in addition to the one ethics hour required during each reporting period for attorneys in Arkansas. The findings and order of the committee were filed with the supreme court clerk on January 31, 2003.

Section 12(C) of the Procedures Regulating Professional Conduct (2003) provides that notice and perfection of an appeal shall be in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure — • Civil and Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court governing appeals in civil matters. If no appeal is perfected within the time allowed and in the manner provided, the action of the panel shall be final and binding on all parties. *Id.*

Ms. Mosby filed a timely notice of appeal under Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 4(a) on November 26, 2003, making the deadline for filing the record ninety days later, on February 24, 2004. Ms. *501Mosby tendered the record to the supreme court clerk on February 27, 2004. Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a record must be tendered within ninety days of the date of the notice of appeal, unless a motion to extend the time has been granted. *See Mitchell v. Mountain View,*304 Ark. 585, 803 S.W.2d 556 (1991). No such motion was requested.

Now before us is appellant’s motion for rule on the clerk, seeking to lodge the record belatedly. In support of her motion, Ms. Mosby asserts that the late tender of the record was the fault of the court reporter in failing to provide the transcript in time for her to file it timely. It is the duty of counsel, not the judge, the clerk, or court reporter to perfect an appeal. *Davis v. Williamson,*353 Ark. 225, 114 S.W.3d 216 (2003).

It was clearly the duty of Ms. Mosby to tender the record to this court in a timely manner, but she failed to do so. Accordingly, the motion for rule on clerk must be denied. The action of Panel B of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct is final.
9/22/13 Details: Refrigerators and Wine Chillers | EnergyEfficiencyRatings | Office of EnergyEfficiency

oee.nrcan.gc.ca/pml-lmp/index.cfm?action=app.formHandler&operation=details-details&ref=4428555&appliance=REFRIGERATORS&nr=1 1/1

Model

Brand

Annual Energy Consumption

(kWh/year)

ENERGY STAR

Type

Defrost Mechanism

Freezer Location

Total Volume (litres)

Total Volume (ft3)

Size Category on EnerGuide

Label

Through the Door Ice Service

Refrigerator Volume (litres)

Refrigerator Volume (ft3)

Freezer Volume (litres)

Freezer Volume (ft3)

Discontinued Date

3036BVWC

U-Line

445

N

Compact refrigerator

Automatic

No freezer

201.616

7.12

3

No

201.616

7.12

0

0

Download Model(s)

Energy Efficiency Ratings: Details

Refrigerators and Wine Chillers (Select a New Product)

Remember that the lower the annual energy consumption rating, the lower your

electricity bills.

ENERGY STAR technical specifications.

Return to results

Date Modified: 2011-12-14

Natural Resources Canada
#### Peter Weiss, Appellant, v. Frederick L. Lavanburg, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
§ 2422.22 What are objections and exceptions concerning the conduct of the hearing? ( a ) *Objections.* Objections are oral or written complaints concerning the conduct of a hearing.
( b ) *Exceptions to rulings.* There are automatic exceptions to all adverse rulings.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-003 January 20, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STATEMENT ON JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DAVIS-BESSE ACTION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) appreciates the attention that the U.S. Attorney’s

office has devoted to this issue which culminated today with the actions announced by the Justice

Department. Central to this matter was a failure by the licensee to ensure that information provided to

the NRC was complete so it can effectively regulate nuclear power plant safety.

The NRC took tough, aggressive action against FirstEnergy, levying the largest fine in NRC

history ($5.45 million) for violations associated with the damage to the reactor vessel head at DavisBesse and for deliberately providing inaccurate and incomplete information to the NRC on reactor

conditions. Action also has been initiated against five individuals. 

The Davis-Besse actions by the NRC, and DOJ and its Environmental Crimes Section, send a

strong message to the industry, emphasizing that appropriate safety margins must be maintained and

that the NRC will not tolerate the failure of licensees and individuals to provide it with accurate and

complete information.

The failure to comply with NRC regulations and provide accurate information led to a two-year

shutdown of the Davis-Besse plant for extensive repairs, major management changes, and

improvements to the safety culture of the plant staff. Only after extensive inspections and oversight

did the agency permit the plant to restart in March 2004. Since that time, the plant has operated safely

and successfully.

The NRC also instituted a “lessons learned” task force following the event to evaluate the

agency’s regulatory processes on reactor vessel head integrity and recommend improvements for both

the NRC and industry. All of the nearly 50 task force recommendations have been implemented.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-056 October 17, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC, FIRSTENERGY TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION

AT BEAVER VALLEY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of FirstEnergy Nuclear

Operating Co. on Tuesday, Oct. 24, to discuss an apparent violation identified during an emergency

preparedness exercise conducted earlier this year at the Beaver Valley nuclear power plant. The

apparent violation involves ineffective corrective actions for an exercise weakness identified in 2004

regarding the performance of the plant’s dose assessment team.

The regulatory conference is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. at the NRC’s Region I Office, 475

Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. (Directions to the office are available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/who-we-are/locations/region1.html .) Members of the public can attend the

meeting and will have an opportunity to ask questions of the NRC staff prior to adjournment.

FirstEnergy operates the two-reactor plant, which is located in Shippingport (Beaver County),

Pa. NRC inspectors determined that during an emergency preparedness exercise at Beaver Valley on

June 27, the company team assigned the task of calculating the amount of radioactivity that would be

released during the hypothetical accident scenario did not develop the best dose projection estimate

achievable at the time. This finding was similar to an NRC-identified weakness exhibited by company

personnel during a May 2004 emergency exercise at the facility.

“The finding appears to have low to moderate safety significance because not adequately

correcting the [plant’s] process for dose projection may adversely impact the timeliness and adequacy

of Protective Action Recommendations made in the event of a radiological release” from the plant, the

NRC inspection report on the exercise stated.

The inspection report is available in the NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and

Management System (ADAMS), under accession number ML062620341. ADAMS is accessible via

the agency’s web site at: www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available by

contacting the NRC’s Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at

PDR@NRC.GOV .
At the regulatory conference, FirstEnergy will be able to present additional information

regarding the apparent violation and discuss any corrective actions.

No decision will be made during the meeting. Rather, the NRC will consider the information

presented and render a decision sometime following the conference.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.