alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 213 (Thursday, November 4, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.
    Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).
    Date: December 7, 2004.
    Location: St. Louis Airport Marriott, 10700 Peartree Lane, St. 
Louis, MO 63134, (1-314-423-9700).
    Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 am and the meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m.
    Agenda: The Board will hear briefings on the status of both the 
funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund. The Board will also begin consideration of its 
priorities for the next fiscal year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CEMP-POD, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20314-1000; Ph: 202-761-1934.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested persons may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-24638 Filed 11-3-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-06-020 September 19, 2006

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $9,600 FINE TO STERIGENICS INTERNATIONAL

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $9,600 fine against Sterigenics

International, Inc. of Oak Brook, Il., for violating NRC requirements for handling securitysensitive information.

NRC staff discussed the violations, their significance, the root cause, and the company’s

corrective actions during a meeting with Sterigenics officials on May 3. 

In a letter to the company, Bruce S. Mallett, Administrator of the NRC’s Region IV office

in Arlington, Texas, said that as a result of an NRC inspection and investigation, the agency

determined that the company violated three NRC requirements. The company operates 13

panoramic irradiators throughout the U.S., primarily to sterilize medical equipment. 

The violations occurred when a senior manager of the company faxed a document

containing security-sensitive information to the company’s security contractor over an

unprotected phone line; provided inaccurate information to an NRC investigator when

questioned about the incident; and failed to ensure that the security contractor would follow

company policies and procedures while handling the security-sensitive information.

“The NRC depends on its licensees to handle security-sensitive information with

appropriate care and to cooperate fully with its investigators when questions about activities

arise,” Mallett said. “The civil penalty underscores the seriousness with which we view these

violations.” 

The company has acknowledged that it violated NRC requirements. “We are pleased the

company has taken corrective action that appropriately address these issues, and is improving its
employee training procedures for handling security-sensitive information to prevent recurrence,”

Mallett said.

The NRC’s letter and the company’s response will be made available to interested

members of the public through the agency’s electronic reading room at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in accessing these documents is available

from the NRC Public Document Room at: 1-800-397-4209.

The company has 30 days from receipt of the Notice of Violation to either pay the civil

penalty or to protest it, in whole or in part. It can also request alternate dispute resolution within

10 days of receipt of the Notice of Violation.

###
<PAGE>

                                                            Exhibit 10.45

October 20, 2003



PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Garrett A. Sullivan
c/o Applied Digital Solutions, Inc.
400 Royal Palm Way, Suite 410
Palm Beach, FL  33480



Re:      Letter Agreement between Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. and
         ------------------------------------------------------------
         G. A. Sullivan
         --------------

Dear Garrett:

Reference is made to the letter agreement, dated April 1, 2003, between
Applied Digital Solutions, Inc. ("ADSX") and you (the "Letter Agreement").
Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meaning
given to them in the Letter Agreement. This will confirm that you and
Applied ADSX have agreed to the following amendment to the Letter Agreement.

     1.  The 7,500,000 Shares provided for in Paragraph 2 of the Letter
         Agreement shall be issued promptly following the date the
         registration statement referred to in such Paragraph 2 is declared
         effective, and not "within five months" as provided in the Letter
         Agreement. The parties acknowledge that a share certificate was
         issued to you and that you returned such certificate in order to
         implement the timing as provided in the preceding sentence. ADSX
         shall issue to you another share certificate in accordance with the
         first sentence of this paragraph.

     2.  Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the other terms of
         the Letter Agreement, including the representations contained
         therein, remain in effect as if stated herein.

If the foregoing correctly sets forth the understanding between us, please
sign this



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

Mr. Garrett A. Sullivan
October 20, 2003
Page 2


letter and fax it back to ADSX at 561-805-8002 attention Kay Langsford.

Very truly yours,

APPLIED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.



By: /s/ Scott Silverman
   --------------------------------------------------
Title:
      -----------------------------------------------



Read and Agreed to
this     day of October, 2003.
     ---


/s/ Garrett A. Sullivan
----------------------------------------------
Garrett A. Sullivan
#### § 337.201 Coverage and purpose.

OPM will permit an agency with delegated examining authority under 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) to use direct-hire authority under 5 U.S.C. 3304(a)(3) for a permanent or nonpermanent position or group of positions in the competitive service at GS-15 (or equivalent) and below, if OPM determines that there is either a severe shortage of candidates or a critical hiring need for such positions. It is not required that this direct-hire authority be exercised by a delegated examining unit. Requests for direct-hire authority must be submitted by the agency's Chief Human Capital Officer (or equivalent) at the agency headquarters level. OPM will determine the length of the direct-hire authority based on the justification.
### §701m. Insufficient Congressional authorization; preparations for and modification of project

In any case where the total authorization for a project heretofore or hereafter authorized by Congress is not sufficient to complete plans that may have been made the Chief of Engineers is authorized in his discretion to plan and make expenditures on preparations for the project, such as the purchase of lands, easements, and rights-of-way; readjustments of roads, railroads, and other utilities; removal of towns, cemeteries, and dwellings from reservoir sites; and the construction of foundations. The Chief of Engineers is also authorized in his discretion to modify the plan for any dam or other work heretofore or hereafter authorized so that such dam or work will be smaller than originally planned with a view to completing a useful improvement within an authorization: Provided, That the smaller structure shall be located on the chosen site so that it will be feasible at some future time to enlarge the work in order to permit the full utilization of the site for all purposes of conservation such as flood control, navigation, reclamation, the development of hydroelectric power, and the abatement of pollution.

(Aug. 18, 1941, ch. 377, §2, 55 Stat. 638.)
Order entered December 2 1, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01373

- CV

JSC LAKE HIGHLANDS O PERATIONS, LP D/B/A VILLAGES OF LAKE HIGHLANDS, METROSTAT DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC., RICHARD M. WILLIAMS, M.D. AND R ICHAR D M. WILLIAMS, M.D., P.L.L.C., Appellant s

V.

KAREN MILLER, INDIVI DUALLY AND AS REPRES ENTATIVE OF THE ESTA TE
OF BETTY RUTH HATHCO CK AND BETTY CROCKET T, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 15

- 00297

- C



### O RDER

W e GRANT appellants’ December 16, 2015 unopposed joint motion for extension of

time to file briefs and ORDER the briefs be filed no later than January 25, 2015.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
##### 



Fiscal Year EndedOctober 29,
    
    
    October 30,
    
    
    October 25,
    
    
    October 26,
    
    
    October 27,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001(Dollars in Thousands)Historical:Net income/(loss)
    
    $
    (11,286
    )
    
    $
    (461
    )
    
    $
    4,528
    
    
    $
    5,926
    
    
    $
    10,800Income tax provision/(benefit)
    
    
    (10,769
    )
    
    
    (3,499
    )
    
    
    1,579
    
    
    
    569
    
    
    
    2,876Net income/(loss) before tax
    
    $
    (22,055
    )
    
    $
    (3,960
    )
    
    $
    6,107
    
    
    $
    6,495
    
    
    $
    13,676Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    25,601
    
    
    $
    22,705
    
    
    $
    21,257
    
    
    $
    21,434
    
    
    $
    24,534Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    3,546
    
    
    $
    18,745
    
    
    $
    27,364
    
    
    $
    27,929
    
    
    $
    38,210Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    x
    
    
    
    x
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    1.6
    x
 (1)
    
    For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges, earnings consist of income before taxes plus fixed charges.
Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness including amortization of deferred financing fees and fixed loan guarantee fees. No ratio
is presented for the fiscal period ended October 29, 2005 or the fiscal period ended October 30, 2004 as the earnings for those periods
were $22,055,000 and $3,960,000, respectively, less than the fixed charges.
### **CHAPTER 15—APPROPRIATION ACCOUNTING**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
1501.
Documentary evidence requirement for Government obligations.
1502.
Balances available.
1503.
Comptroller General reports of amounts for which no accounting is made.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—APPORTIONMENT

1511.
Definition and application.
1512.
Apportionment and reserves.
1513.
Officials controlling apportionments.
1514.
Administrative division of apportionments.
1515.
Authorized apportionments necessitating deficiency or supplemental appropriations.
1516.
Exemptions.
1517.
Prohibited obligations and expenditures.
1518.
Adverse personnel actions.
1519.
Criminal penalty.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—TRANSFERS AND REIMBURSEMENTS

1531.
Transfers of functions and activities.
1532.
Withdrawal and credit.
1533.
Transfers of appropriations for salaries and expenses to carry out national defense responsibilities.
1534.
Adjustments between appropriations.
1535.
Agency agreements.
1536.
Crediting payments from purchases between executive agencies.
1537.
Services between the United States Government and the District of Columbia government.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—CLOSING ACCOUNTS

1551.
Definitions; applicability of subchapter.
1552.
Procedure for appropriation accounts available for definite periods.
1553.
Availability of appropriation accounts to pay obligations.
1554.
Audit, control, and reporting.
1555.
Closing of appropriation accounts available for indefinite periods.
1556.
Comptroller General: reports on appropriation accounts.
1557.
Authority for exemptions in appropriation laws.
1558.
Availability of funds following resolution of a formal protest or other challenge.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1996**—Pub. L. 104–106, div. E, title LV, §5502(c), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 699, substituted "of a formal protest or other challenge" for "of a protest" in item 1558.

**1992**—Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1054(e)(1), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2503, substituted "Definitions; applicability of subchapter" for "Definitions and application" in item 1551 and "Procedure for appropriation accounts available for definite periods" for "Audit, control, and reporting" in item 1552.

**1990**—Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIV, §1405(a)(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1679, substituted "Audit, control, and reporting" for "Procedure for appropriation accounts available for definite periods" in item 1552 and for "Review of appropriation accounts" in item 1554, "Closing of appropriation accounts available" for "Withdrawal of unobligated balances of appropriations" in item 1555, "General: reports" for "General reports" in item 1556, and "Authority for exemptions in appropriation laws" for "Authorization to exempt" in item 1557.

**1989**—Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title VIII, §813(b), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1494, added item 1558.
§ 210.71 Information gathering. ( a ) *Power to require information.* ( 1 ) Whenever the Commission issues an exclusion order, the Commission may require any person to report facts available to that person that will help the Commission assist the U.S. Customs Service in determining whether and to what extent there is compliance with the order. Similarly, whenever the Commission issues a cease and desist order or a consent order, it may require any person to report facts available to that person that will aid the Commission in determining whether and to what extent there is compliance with the order or whether and to what extent the conditions that led to the order are changed.
( 2 ) The Commission may also include provisions that exercise any other information-gathering power available to the Commission by law, regardless of whether the order at issue is an exclusion order, a cease and desist order, or a consent order. The Commission may at any time request the cooperation of any person or agency in supplying it with information that will aid the Commission or the U.S. Customs Service in making the determinations described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) *Form and detail of reports.* Reports under paragraph (a) of this section are to be in writing, under oath, and in such detail and in such form as the Commission prescribes.
( c ) *Power to enforce informational requirements.* Terms and conditions of exclusion orders, cease and desist orders, and consent orders for reporting and information gathering shall be enforceable by the Commission by a civil action under 19 U.S.C. 1333, or, at the Commission's discretion, in the same manner as any other provision of the exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order is enforced.
( d ) *Term of reporting requirement.* An exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order may provide for the frequency of reporting or information gathering and the date on which these activities are to terminate. If no date for termination is provided, reporting and information gathering shall terminate when the exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order or any amendment to it expires by its own terms or is terminated.
[59 FR 39039, Aug. 1, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 38327, July 7, 2008]
### §3341. Sale of Government warrants, checks, drafts, and obligations

(a) A disbursing official of the United States Government may sell a Government warrant, check, draft, or obligation not the property of the official at a premium, or dispose of the proceeds of the warrant, check, draft, or obligation, only if the official deposits the premium and the proceeds in the Treasury or with a depositary for the credit of the Government.

(b) A disbursing official violating subsection (a) of this section shall be dismissed immediately.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 956.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3341(a) | 31:544(words before last semicolon). | R.S. §3652. |
| 3341(b) | 31:544(words after last semicolon). | |

In subsection (a), the words "disbursing official" are substituted for "officer" for clarity and consistency in the revised title. The words "either directly or indirectly" and "or dispose of to any person" are omitted as surplus. The words "Government warrant, check, draft, or obligation" are substituted for "Treasury note, draft, warrant, or other public security" for consistency in the revised title. The words "or sell . . . avails or . . . in his hands for disbursement" are omitted as surplus. The words "only if the official deposits the premium and the proceeds in the Treasury or with a depositary" are substituted for "without making return of such premium, and accounting therefor by charging the same in his account" for clarity and consistency in the chapter.

In subsection (b), the words "from office" are omitted as unnecessary.
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
William B. Plummer, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 1, 2011



/s/    WILLIAM B. PLUMMERWilliam B. PlummerChief Financial Officer
### §1414a. Special provisions regarding certain dumping sites

#### (a) New York Bight Apex

(1) For purposes of this subsection—

(A) The term "Apex" means the New York Bight Apex consisting of the ocean waters of the Atlantic Ocean westward of 73 degrees 30 minutes west longitude and northward of 40 degrees 10 minutes north latitude.

(B) The term "Apex site" means that site within the Apex at which the dumping of municipal sludge occurred before October 1, 1983.

(C) The term "eligible authority" means any sewerage authority or other unit of State or local government that on November 2, 1983, was authorized under court order to dump municipal sludge at the Apex site.

(2) No person may apply for a permit under this subchapter in relation to the dumping of, or the transportation for purposes of dumping, municipal sludge within the Apex unless that person is an eligible authority.

(3) The Administrator may not issue, or renew, any permit under this subchapter that authorizes the dumping of, or the transportation for purposes of dumping, municipal sludge within the Apex after the earlier of—

(A) December 15, 1987; or

(B) the day determined by the Administrator to be the first day on which municipal sludge generated by eligible authorities can reasonably be dumped at a site designated under section 1412 of this title other than a site within the Apex.

#### (b) Restriction on use of 106-mile site

The Administrator may not issue or renew any permit under this subchapter which authorizes any person, other than a person that is an eligible authority within the meaning of subsection (a)(1)(C), to dump, or to transport for the purposes of dumping, municipal sludge within the site designated under section 1412(c) of this title by the Administrator and known as the "106-Mile Ocean Waste Dump Site" (as described in 49 F.R. 19005).

(Pub. L. 92–532, title I, §104A, as added Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1172(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4259; Pub. L. 100–4, title V, §508(b), Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 79; Pub. L. 100–688, title I, §1002, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4139.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–688 repealed the second of two identical sections 104A of Pub. L. 92–532, both classified to this section and enacted by Pub. L. 99–662 and Pub. L. 100–4, thereby involving no change in text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### New York Bight Apex Not Suitable for Dumping

Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1172(a), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4259, provided that: "The Congress finds that the New York Bight Apex is no longer a suitable location for the ocean dumping of municipal sludge."

An identical provision was enacted by Pub. L. 100–4, title V, §508(a), Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 79.
#### Walter Michalowski, Appellant, v. Frederick J. Ey, as Office of Property Custodian, Nassau County Police Department, Respondent.

In an action to recover possession of an automobile, or, if possession cannot be given, for judgment for $1,000, its alleged value, together with $4,000, as damages for its detention, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See 283 App. Div. 725.]