alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Annie Jopp et al., Appellees, v. R. H. Fairburn and Fortune Bros. Brewing Company, Appellants.

Gen. No. 5,858.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. Charles Whitney, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Annie Jopp and others against R. H. Fair-burn and Fortune Bros. Brewing Company under section 9 of the Dramshop Act, J. & A. ¶ 4609, to recover damages for injuries to plaintiffs ’ means of support by reason of the death of Barthomic Jopp, husband of Anna Jopp, alleged to have been caused by intoxicating liquors sold to him by Fairburn in a building owned by the- Brewing Company. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff against both defendants *281for thirteen hundred dollars, defendant Brewing Company alone appeals.

For decision in this case on a former appeal, see *Jopp v. Fairburn,*157 Ill. App. 609.

A. F. Beaubien, for appellant Fortune Bros. Brewing Company.

E. V. Orvis, for appellees; Cooke, Pope & Pope, of counsel.

Abstract of the Decision.

Intoxicating liqtjobs, § *230*****—when judgment for loss of means of support sustained by the evidence.*In an action by a widow and children against a saloon keeper, and a brewing company as owner of the building, to recover damages for loss of means of support under section 9 of the Dramshop Act, J. & A. ¶ 4609, on account of the sale of intoxicating liquors to the husband, *held*that a judgment against the defendants was sustained by evidence showing that the brewing company was owner of the building and had knowledge that intoxicating liquors were sold there.

Whitney, P. J., took no part in this decision.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stan Cipkowski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)[omitted]; and

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

/s/ Stan Cipkowski
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 12, 2004

                                       17
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle, IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-02-040 July 9, 2002

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630)829-9662

NRC ANNOUNCES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT BRAIDWOOD NUCLEAR POWER STATION

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have assigned Steven P. Ray as a

senior resident inspector at the Braidwood Nuclear Power Station in Braceville, Illinois.

Ray, who began his duties at the Braidwood plant in April, joined the NRC in 1988 as resident

inspector at the Clinton Nuclear Power Station in Clinton, Illinois. He was also senior resident

inspector at the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant in Monticello, Minnesota, and at the Prairie Island

Nuclear Power Plant in Welch, Minnesota. Ray was active in the development of the Revised Reactor

Oversight Program as one of the ten pilot plant senior resident inspectors.

Prior to joining the NRC, Ray ran a company surveying homes for radioactive radon gas. He

worked for Westinghouse for six years as an operating crew shift foreman at the Byron Nuclear Power

Station in Byron, Illinois, and as a senior reactor operator training instructor. 

Ray began his career in the nuclear industry in 1972 as an officer in the Naval Nuclear

Submarine Program. During nine years in the navy, he served in various positions on the USS Pargo

and the USS Plunger and taught at the Naval Nuclear Power School in Orlando, Florida.

Ray received a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics with a minor in Physics and a Secondary

Education Teaching Certificate from the University of Minnesota. He also earned a Westinghouse

Pressurized Water Reactor Senior Reactor Operator Instructor Certificate. Ray and his wife Linda live

in Morris, Illinois.

Ray joined resident inspector Nirodh Shah at the Braidwood plant. They can be reached at

(815)458-2852.

# # #
Exhibit 32

The following certification accompanies and is furnished in connection with Firstwave Technologies, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and is not considered as
filed as provided in SEC Release Nos 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                                                                                                     

|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2004 |  | /s/ Richard T. Brock   
|                       |  | Richard T. Brock       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |                        
|Dated: August 11, 2004 |  | /s/ Judith A. Vitale   
|                       |  | Judith A. Vitale       
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Firstwave Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Firstwave Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7296

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CURTIS SATTERWHITE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-92-146, CA-98-574-3) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 3, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Satterwhite, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Satterwhite , No. CR-92-146; CA98-574-3 (E.D. Va. May 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-008 March 28, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Tennessee Valley

Authority officials April 5 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

Sequoyah nuclear power plant, located near Soddy-Daisy, Tenn. The period covered is the calendar

year 2005.

The 2:00 p.m. meeting at the Sequoyah Training Center is open to public observation. Before

the meeting ends, NRC staff will be available to answer public questions on the plant’s safety

performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff assesses the performance of the Sequoyah plant and all of the

nation’s other commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. 

“This meeting gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and

with residents near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer

any questions people may have about our oversight.”

The report says the Sequoyah plant operated safely during 2005. The NRC uses color-coded

inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant performance. The colors start

with “green” and increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of

the issues involved. Both Sequoyah reactors received “green” inspection findings from the NRC

during 2005, which means that all were of low safety significance. As a result, Sequoyah will

receive the baseline, or normal, level of NRC inspections during 2006.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/seq_2005q4.pdf .

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

inspection specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville,

Md. In addition to the baseline inspections in 2006, the NRC plans inspections of Sequoyah’s

Independent Spent Fuel (Dry Cask) Storage Installation and inspections of Unit 2 containment

building sumps and the Unit 2 reactor pressure vessel heads and head penetration nozzles. These

inspections are part of the agency’s review of sump clogging and vessel head penetration cracking at

pressurized water reactors.
 Current performance information for Sequoyah Unit 1 is available on the NRC’s web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ1/seq1_chart.html and at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEQ2/seq2_chart.html for Sequoyah Unit 2 .

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 05-141 October 17, 2005

ASLB TO HOLD EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON PROPOSED N.M. ENRICHMENT

FACILITY, OCT. 24-27 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will conduct an

evidentiary hearing Oct. 24-27 at agency headquarters in Rockville, Md., concerning the application of

Louisiana Energy Services (LES) to construct and operate a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility

in Lea County, N.M.

The majority of the hearing will be closed to the public, because the testimony will include

information that is proprietary to LES’ proposed facility. The first session on Monday, Oct. 24, will

begin with a public session for opening statements by LES, the NRC staff, and the intervenors - the

Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) and Public Citizen. There will be a second public

session at the end of the hearing.

The Board will hear evidence regarding the technical contentions filed by NIRS and Public

Citizen challenging the LES application. These contentions pertain primarily to costs associated with

facility decommissioning and the disposal of depleted uranium tails created by the enrichment process. 

The hearing will be held in the ASLB hearing room at NRC headquarters, Two White Flint

North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. The public session on Oct. 24 will begin at 9:30 a.m. and

is expected to last for 1-2 hours. Updates on any subsequent public sessions will be available by calling

1-800-368-5642, ext. 5036. The hearing is being held in Maryland due to the necessity for closed

sessions to discuss proprietary information.

As part of the licensing process, NRC regulations require the Board to conduct an additional

evidentiary hearing to assess environmental and technical matters that were not raised by intervening

party challenges to the LES application. The Board currently expects to conduct this public hearing in

Lea County in March 2006, including one or more “limited appearance” sessions during which

members of the public will be able to present the Board with their views on the LES license

application.

###
#### §§ 2424.51-2424.59 [Reserved]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-066 April 12, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE TO MEET 

APRIL 18-19 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste will hold a

public meeting April 18-19, in Rockville, Md., where, among other items, members will discuss

rulemaking efforts regarding the National Source Tracking System and be briefed by members of the

Department of Energy on the status of design and transportation matters related to the proposed

geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev. 

The session on Monday will run from 10:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; the Tuesday session will run

from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. The sessions will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint

North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. For more information on the meeting, contact Sharon Steele,

at 301-415-6805. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2004/ . 

###
### §386. Commissioning private vessels for seizure of piratical vessels

The President is authorized to instruct the commanders of the public-armed vessels of the United States, and to authorize the commanders of any other armed vessels sailing under the authority of any letters of marque and reprisal granted by Congress, or the commanders of any other suitable vessels, to subdue, seize, take, and, if on the high seas, to send into any port of the United States, any vessel or boat built, purchased, fitted out, or held as mentioned in section 385 of this title.

(R.S. §4298.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4298 derived from act Aug. 5, 1861, ch. 48, §2, 12 Stat. 315.
### SUBCHAPTER II—APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION OF OFFICERS
#### § 2423.29 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

      ( print page 65676)    

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

This gives notice that under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972, that the Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee (MSHRAC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through November 30, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jeffrey H. Welsh, Designated Federal Officer, CDC/Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee (MSHRAC), CDC, HHS, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, Telephone 412-386-4040,                         *juw5@cdc.gov.*

                        The Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Sherri Berger,

Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2018-27720 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
- R

NRC NEWS

0a U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

www.nrc.gov

No. 1-04-015 March 25, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1(nrc.Rov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO HOLD MEETINGS ON VERMONT YANKEE NUCLEAR PLANT

PERFORMANCE AND POWER UPRATE REVIEW

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy

Nuclear on Wednesday, March 31, to discuss the results of the agency's annual assessment of

safety performance at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. Agency staff will also discuss,

in a subsequent separate meeting with the public, its review of a power uprate application for the

plant, which is operated by Entergy Nuclear and located in Vernon, Vt.

The annual assessment meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is

scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at the Vernon Elementary School, 381 Governor Hunt Road in

Vernon. NRC staff will discuss plant performance for the period from January 1 to December

31, 2003, as well as provide a brief overview of agency's Reactor Oversight Process. Before the

session is adjourned, the staff will be available to answer questions from the public on plant

performance issues.

Following the assessment meeting and a short break, the NRC will meet with the

public at approximately 8 p.m. to discuss the status of the agency's review of Entergy Nuclear's

request for a power uprate at Vermont Yankee. The NRC's review of that request is still in the

early stages. NRC staff will start this meeting with a brief presentation describing the agency's

review of power uprate applications. Afterwards, the staff will answer questions related to

NRC's power uprate review process.

With regard to the NRC's annual assessment of Vermont Yankee, the agency found

that overall, the plant operated safely and met all cornerstone objectives during the period.

(Cornerstones are measures of plant performance.) A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office

to plant officials addresses the performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the

basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the NRC web site at:

wxvw.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/vv 2003q4.pdf.

On the topic of security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories

to enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on
ISeptember 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of

these requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat

conditions. The NRC will continue security inspections in 2004.

Current performance information for Vermont Yankee is available on the NRC web

site at: www.nrc.gzov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESSfVY/vv chart.html .
#### Marie Robinson, Respondent, v. Bertha Robinson et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 821.]