alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-029 February 14, 2005

 DR. WILLIAM J. HINZE AND DR. JAMES H. CLARKE

APPOINTED TO NRC’S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has appointed Drs. William J. Hinze and James H.

Clarke to its Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW). They will provide independent

technical advice on activities, programs and issues related to regulating, managing and disposing of

radioactive waste. Their appointments bring the committee to a full five-member complement.

Hinze is currently a professor emeritus at Purdue University. He has taught and done research

on solid-earth geophysics at Michigan State and Purdue Universities for more than 40 years. He has

been a graduate advisor to approximately 100 master’s and doctorate students, and his research has

been supported by a variety of governmental, industrial, and research organizations. He has had a major

role in developing and applying geophysical techniques, particularly geopotential methods, to the

exploration of the continental crust.

Additionally, Hinze served on the ACNW from 1989 to 1997 and has served as an advisor to

such federal departments and agencies as NASA, the U.S. Geological Survey and the Department of

Energy, as well as engineering, mining and petroleum organizations. He has also been senior editor of

the Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth and chairman of the board of journal editors of the

American Geophysical Union. 

Clarke is currently a professor of the Practice of Civil and Environmental Engineering and the

director of Graduate Studies for Environmental Engineering at Vanderbilt University. His expertise and

experience are in the environmental effects and transport of chemicals and radionuclides in the

environment, risk assessment, hazardous and radioactive waste management, and the investigation and

remediation of contaminated sites. 

His research has focused on the long-term management of legacy hazardous and radioactive

waste sites, and applying risk assessment to decision making at contaminated sites. He has provided

assistance and independent peer review to the Department of Energy and the NRC in the investigation

and remediation of subsurface contamination, risk-informed approaches to contaminated site

remediation, and the management of high-level, hazardous and mixed waste.
2

Other Members of the Committee are:

Michael T. Ryan, independent consultant and faculty member, Charleston, S.C.;

Allen G. Croff, consultant, former manager of Environmental Management Program Development,

Oak Ridge National Laboratory; and Ruth F. Weiner, consultant, Sandia National Laboratory,

Albuquerque, N.M.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-130 October 12, 2004

NRC APPROVES THIRD LICENSE AMENDMENT FOR NUCLEAR FUEL SERVICES’ 

BLENDED LOW-ENRICHED URANIUM PROJECT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved a license amendment to authorize Nuclear

Fuel Services, Inc., to possess and use Special Nuclear Material at two facilities on its Erwin,

Tennessee, complex. The amendment is the final of three associated with the Blended Low-Enriched

Uranium (BLEU) project.

This license amendment allows NFS to begin using the oxide conversion building and effluent

processing building for the BLEU project. 

Special Nuclear Material refers to plutonium, uranium-233, or uranium enriched in the isotopes

uranium-233 or uranium-235.

The NRC approved the first amendment, for a uranyl nitrite building, in July 2003. A second

amendment, for the blended, low-enriched uranium preparation facility, was approved in January. 

NFS also submitted changes to its security plan to address physical protection of the new

buildings, as well as changes to its nuclear materials control plan to support the amendment request. 

These changes were approved in the NRC’s safety evaluation report for the license amendment.

Notice of the approved license amendment was published today in the Federal Register. Nonproprietary portions of the safety evaluation report are available on the NRC’s ADAMS document

system, at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , using accession number

ML042660436. Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room

staff at 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov . The documents are also

available for inspection at the NRC’s Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md.

###
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Nancy J. Baker,certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cymer, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)        designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  May  6, 2004 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     | /s/ NANCY J. BAKER |   |
|                     | Nancy J. Baker |   |
|                     | Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                          |  |  |  |  |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50865

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONY MICHAEL UPTON; 

SANTA BARBARA CASTLE DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

a/k/a Castle Construction Corp.,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-94-CR-10-4,5

- - - - - - - - - -

August 7, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel was appointed by this court to assist Antony Michael

Upton in challenging the district court’s determination that any

appeal would be frivolous, thus denying Upton leave to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis (IFP). Court-appointed counsel has

moved to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of counsel’s

statement of issues, Upton’s response, and the record discloses
No. 96-50865

-2-

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, Upton’s motion for leave to

proceed IFP is DENIED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2.

Because no attorney has made an appearance on behalf of the

defendant corporation, the appeal is DISMISSED as to the

corporation for want of prosecution. See 5th Cir. R. 42.3.1; In

re K.M.A., Inc., 652 F.2d 398, 399 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981).

IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Hedwig A. Kennedy v. James B. Kennedy.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*pp. 759, 847.]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10(a).2    
  


 
 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    
  


In connection with the Annual Report of Nokia Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge: 


	1.
	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



	2.
	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 






	

Date: February 7, 2003	
 	

 	
 	

/s/  JORMA OLLILA      

	 	 	Name:	 	Jorma Ollila
	 	 	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	

Date: February 7, 2003	
 	

 	
 	

/s/  OLLI-PEKKA KALLASVUO      

	 	 	Name:	 	Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo
	 	 	Title:	 	Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(a).2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         I, Yang Lei, citizen of the People's Republic of China (the " PRC"),
the ID Code is 110108570422271, hereby irrevocably assigns Mark Franklin Begert
the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of Attorney:

         I hereby assigns Mark Franklin Begert to vote on my behalf at the
shareholders' meetings of Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. and exercise the
full voting rights as the shareholder of the company as have been given to me by
law and under the Articles of Association of the company, including but not
limited to, the right to sell or transfer any or all of the shares of Shanghai
Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. held by myself and designate and appoint the
directors and the general manager etc of Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd.
acting as my authorized representative on the shareholders' meeting of the
company.

         Such authorization is based upon the condition that Mark Franklin
Begert is acting as an employee of Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. and
Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. agrees such authorization and
designation. Once Mark Franklin Begert loses his title or position in Shanghai
Unilink Computer Co., Ltd. or Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. issues a
written notice to dismiss or replace the designated/authorized person, I will
withdraw such authorization to him immediately and designate/authorize other
individual employed by Shanghai Huitong Information Co., Ltd. to exercise the
full voting rights on behalf of myself at the shareholders' meetings of Shanghai
Unilink Computer Co., Ltd.

         The term of this Power of Attorney is 10 years unless the early
termination of Operation Agreement jointly executed by Shanghai Huitong
Information Co., Ltd., Shanghai Unilink Computer Co., Ltd., Du Minsheng,
Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. and me by any reason, commencing from the
execution date of this Power of Attorney. This Power of Attorney is executed by
Chinese and English, and in case of confliction, the Chinese version is prevail.

                                                 Signature: /s/ Raymond Lei Yang

                                                               27 November, 2003
§ 210.70 Forfeiture or return of complainant's temporary relief bond. ( a ) ( 1 ) If the Commission determines that one or more of the respondents whose merchandise was covered by the temporary relief order has not violated section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to the extent alleged in the motion for temporary relief and provided for in the temporary relief order, proceedings to determine whether the complainant's bond should be forfeited to one or more respondents in whole or part may be initiated upon the filing of a motion by a respondent within 30 days after filing of the aforesaid Commission determination on violation.
( 2 ) A complainant may file a motion for the return of its bond.
( b ) Any nonmoving party may file a response to a motion filed under paragraph (a) of this section within 15 days after filing of the motion, unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge.
( c ) A motion for forfeiture or return of a complainant's temporary relief bond in whole or part will be adjudicated by the administrative law judge in an initial determination with a 45-day effective date, which shall be subject to review under the provisions of §§ 210.42 through 210.45. In determining whether to grant the motion, the administrative law judge and the Commission will be guided by practice under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
[59 FR 67629, Dec. 30, 1994]
#### American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
|                            |  |
|----------------------------|--|
|                            |
| Advanced Search					  |
### §2504. Guidance

Not later than 3 months after November 18, 1988, the Secretary of Defense and the head of each affected agency, in consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall each issue guidance for public vessels under the jurisdiction of their agency regarding implementation of section 2503 of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title III, §3105, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4153.)
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-060 April 5, 2005

NRC ANNOUNCES AVAILABILITY OF

LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR PALISADES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced today that an application for a 20-year renewal

of the operating license for the Palisades nuclear power plant is available for public review.

The Palisades plant is located approximately five miles south of South Haven, Mich., and its

current operating license expires on March 24, 2011.

The licensee, Nuclear Management Company, submitted the renewal application March 31. It is

available on the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html .

The NRC staff is currently conducting an initial review of the application to determine whether

it contains enough information for the required formal review. If the application has sufficient

information, the NRC will formally “docket,” or file, the application and will announce an opportunity

to request a public hearing.

For further information, contact Michael Morgan, Division of Regulatory Improvement

Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop O11F1, Washington, D.C. 20555; Telephone (301) 415-2232.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov 

No. III-03-073 December 8, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Victoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH FIRSTENERGY TO DISCUSS DAVIS-BESSE RESTART

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet December 18 with representatives of

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company in Oak Harbor, Ohio, to discuss the possible startup of the

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant. The plant, located near Oak Harbor, has been shut down since

February of last year.

A second meeting will be held that day to present the preliminary findings of the NRC’s

inspection reviewing management and human performance at Davis-Besse, including the safety culture

of the plant staff.

The safety culture inspection meeting will be at 1:30 p.m. in the Davis-Besse Administration

Building, 5503 North State Route 2, Oak Harbor.

The restart meeting will begin at 6 p.m. in the Camp Perry Clubhouse, 1000 Lawrence Road,

Bldg. 600, on Highway 2 west of Port Clinton. A picture identification is required to enter Camp Perry;

the guards will provide visitors with directions to the meeting site. 

The public is invited to observe the business portion of each meeting and will have an

opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the meetings are adjourned.

The restart meeting schedule is contingent on the Davis-Besse plant beginning preparations for

startup which involve gradually building up heat and pressure in the reactor cooling system using the

reactor cooling pumps. If these activities are delayed, the restart meeting and the safety culture

meeting may be rescheduled. 

The NRC Restart Readiness Assessment Team Inspection, which began December 8, will

observe the plant operating staff as it makes the transition from Mode 5 (known as cold shutdown) to

Mode 4 and Mode 3, which reflects increasing temperatures in the reactor cooling system. The utility

may not start up the reactor (Mode 2) without NRC approval.

At the 6 p.m. restart meeting, FirstEnergy will present the basis for its request to the NRC for

authorization to restart the Davis-Besse plant. It will also discuss its assessment of the performance of

the operating staff during the initial heatup process.
-2-

There will be no decision on possible restart during the meeting. In evaluating FirstEnergy’s

request for restart, the NRC’s Davis-Besse Oversight Panel will review the information presented by

the company, along with the results of NRC inspections over the past 21 months.

The panel will submit its recommendation to James Caldwell, Regional Administrator for NRC

Region III. Mr. Caldwell will make a decision on the possible restart after conferring with other senior

NRC officials. The decision will be based on the agency’s assessment of the ability of FirstEnergy to

start up and operate the plant safely.

Extensive information on the NRC’s regulatory activities at Davis-Besse are available on the

agency’s web site: http://www.nrc.gov - select “Davis-Besse” from the key topics menu.

# # #
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF

THE ESTATE OF NELIDA TORRES,

DECEASED

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 24

- 00002

- C V

Appeal from

Probate Court Number Two

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2020CPR00379 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction . We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction . We

further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal and this decision to be certified below for

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 6 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024.

L ISA SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J

.
§ 2100.11 Penalties. ( a ) An individual may bring a civil action against the AFRH to correct or amend the record, or where there is a refusal to comply with an individual request or failure to maintain any record with accuracy, relevance, timeliness and completeness, so as to guarantee fairness, or failure to comply with any other provision of the Privacy Act. The court may order correction or amendment of records. The court may enjoin the AFRH from withholding the records and order the production of the record.
( b ) Where it is determined that the action was willful or intentional with respect to 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(C) or (D), the United States may be liable for the actual damages sustained.
( c ) Criminal penalties may be imposed against an officer or employee of the USSAH or USNH who discloses material, which he/she knows is prohibited from disclosure, or who willfully maintains a system of records without compliance with the notice requirements.
( d ) Criminal penalties may be imposed against any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning another individual from an agency under false pretenses.
( e ) All of these offenses are misdemeanors with a fine not to exceed $5,000.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose CONTRERAS-ALVARDO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-50014.

D.C. No. CR-00-01742-IEG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 29, 2002.

*695Before FERNANDEZ, WARDLAW and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Contreras-Alvarado appeals his conviction and sentence of time served and two years of supervised release, imposed after pleading guilty to importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Contreras-Alvarado contends the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment, in which he challenged the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. § 960 in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This contention is foreclosed by our recent decisions in *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2002) (upholding facial constitutionality of § 960) and *United States v. Varela-Rivera,*279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2002) (same, as to § 952). Moreover, the district court properly imposed a sentence based upon a drug type and quantity to which Contreras-Alvarado admitted in his guilty plea. *See Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d at 1110 (finding no error where district court determined drug quantity by preponderance of evidence and sentenced defendant below statutory maximum).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.