alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2292. Surveying and mapping

Any surveying or mapping services to be performed in connection with a water resources project which is or has been authorized to be undertaken by the Secretary shall be procured in accordance with title IX of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949.1

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §918, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4192.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1949, ch. 288, 63 Stat. 377. Title IX of the Act, which was classified generally to subchapter VI (§541 et seq.) of chapter 10 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, was repealed and reenacted by Pub. L. 107–217, §§1, 6(b), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062, 1304, as chapter 11 (§1101 et seq.) of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works. For disposition of sections of former Title 40 to revised Title 40, see Table preceding section 101 of Title 40. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Geomatic Data

Pub. L. 115–270, title I, §1118, Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3776, provided that:

"(a) In General.—The Secretary [of the Army] shall develop guidance for the acceptance and use of information obtained from a non-Federal interest through geomatic techniques, including remote sensing and land surveying, cartography, geographic information systems, global navigation satellite systems, photogrammetry, or other remote means, in carrying out any authority of the Secretary.

"(b) Considerations.—In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall ensure that use of information described in subsection (a) meets the data quality and operational requirements of the Secretary.

"(c) Savings Clause.—Nothing in this section—

"(1) requires the Secretary to accept information that the Secretary determines does not meet the guidance developed under this section; or

"(2) changes the current statutory or regulatory requirements of the Corps of Engineers."

1 See References in Text note below.
456 *P.2d 221*

#### Michael TICKNOR, Kathie Ticknor, Jeffrey Carlisle, Joan Carlisle and Eugenia Franco, Petitioners, v. Joe ANGEL, District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District, Respondent.

No. 8873.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 25, 1969.

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition and Exercise of Superintending Control be and the same is hereby denied.
### §701b–8a. Discontinuance of preliminary examination reports

For preliminary examinations and surveys authorized in previous river and harbor and flood control Acts, the Secretary of the Army is directed to cause investigations and reports for flood control and allied purposes, to be prepared under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers in the form of survey reports, and that preliminary examination reports shall no longer be required to be prepared.

(Pub. L. 85–500, title II, §208, July 3, 1958, 72 Stat. 319.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Previous river and harbor and flood-control Acts, referred to in text, means those acts prior to the River and Harbor Act of 1958 and the Flood Control Act of 1958, titles I and II of Pub. L. 85–500.
RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST II
                                Exhibit 32.1
                                ------------
                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Swanson, Chief Executive Officer of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust II.
(the "Registrant"),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 16, 2004

                                       Signature:

                                       /s/ Robert Swanson
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Robert Swanson
                                       Chief Executive Officer
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-008 January 24, 2006

NRC’S 18TH ANNUAL REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE

TO BE MARCH 7-9 IN ROCKVILLE, MD.

More than 1,000 people are expected to attend the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s

Regulatory Information Conference (RIC), March 7-9, at the Marriott Bethesda North, 5701 Marinelli

Road, Rockville, Md. Attendees will include representatives from more than 20 foreign countries.

Also expected are staff members from the U.S. Congress.

Speakers at the conference will include Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Nils Diaz

and Commissioners Edward McGaffigan, Jeffrey Merrifield, Gregory Jaczko and Peter Lyons. The

conference is free and open to the public. Those interested in attending can register at the NRC’s Web

site, http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/conference-symposia/ric/registration.html , and onsite

registration will also be available during the conference. The RIC is a joint presentation of the NRC’s

Offices of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and Nuclear Regulatory Research.

The conference brings together NRC staff, regulated utilities and other interested stakeholders

to meet and discuss nuclear safety topics and regulatory trends. Topics at this year’s RIC include

licensing new nuclear power plants, emergency preparedness lessons from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita,

and the proposed national high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain.

The conference agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/conference-symposia/ric/ . 

###
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00270

- CR

No. 10

- 21

- 00271

- CR

IN RE KEVIN MICHAEL COFFEY

Original Proceeding

From the 443rd District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No s

. 40456CR & 40458CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kevin Coffey filed two Petition s for Writ of Mandamus in this Court on October

18, 2021. Coffey seeks to have this Court order the trial court to produce documents

relating to his post

- conviction writ s of habeas corpus , and for th e Court to compel the

trial court to review his entire po st

- conviction writ s of habeas corpus and resubmit the m

to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Coffey further seeks to have the trial court reverse its

ruling on the motion to suppress evidence. This Court does not have jurisdiction overIn re Co ffey Page 2

post

- conviction writs of habeas corpus

. See T EX

. C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.07 . Accordingly,

Coffey’s petition s for writ of mandamus are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray

, *

Justice Johnson,

and Justice Smith

* (Chief Justice Gray concur s in the result, a separate opinion will not issue.)

Petition s dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 27 , 2021

Do not publish

[ OT 06]
### §2353a. Aging infrastructure

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Aging infrastructure

The term "aging infrastructure" means a water resources development project of the Corps of Engineers, or any other water resources, water storage, or irrigation project of another Federal agency, that is greater than 75 years old.

#### (2) Enhanced inspection

The term "enhanced inspection" means an inspection that uses current or innovative technology, including Light Detection and Ranging (commonly known as "LiDAR"), ground penetrating radar, subsurface imaging, or subsurface geophysical techniques, to detect whether the features of the aging infrastructure are structurally sound and can operate as intended, or are at risk of failure.

#### (b) Contracts for enhanced inspection

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may carry out enhanced inspections of aging infrastructure, pursuant to a contract with the owner or operator of the aging infrastructure.

#### (2) Certain circumstances

Subject to the availability of appropriations, or funds available pursuant to subsection (d), the Secretary shall enter into a contract described in paragraph (1), if—

(A) the owner or operator of the aging infrastructure requests that the Secretary carry out the enhanced inspections; and

(B) the inspection is at the full expense of such owner or operator.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not require a non-Federal entity associated with a project under the jurisdiction of another Federal agency to carry out corrective or remedial actions in response to an enhanced inspection carried out under this section.

#### (d) Funding

The Secretary is authorized to accept funds from an owner or operator of aging infrastructure, and may use such funds to carry out an enhanced inspection pursuant to a contract entered into with such owner or operator under this section.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title I, §138, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2651.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2020, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of div. AA of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0089 - Update of the Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan

Accession Number: ML060820624

Date Released: Tuesday, May 2, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML060820620 - SECY-06-0089 - Update of the Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan. (10 page(s), 4/18/2006)
    - ML060830027 - SECY-06-0089Enclosure 1 - Table of Accomplishments on RIRIP (5 page(s), 4/18/2006)
    - ML060830032 - SECY-06-0089Enclosure 2 - Risk-Informed Regulation Implementation Plan (124 page(s), 4/1/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of EXE Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Joseph L. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Kenneth R. Vines, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that :

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                      |  |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2003 |  | /s/ JOSEPH L. COWAN

Joseph L. Cowan
Chief Executive Officer  
|                      |  |                                                               
|Dated: April 29, 2003 |  | /s/ KENNETH R. VINES

Kenneth R. Vines
Chief Financial Officer

A signed orginal of this written stement required by Section 906 has ben
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securieties Exchaggne Commission or its staff upon request.;

21
### §569d. Safety award and promotional materials

#### (a) Promotion of safety program

#### (1) Procurement of promotional materials

The Secretary is authorized to procure materials that, in the judgment of the Secretary, are necessary to promote the Corps of Engineers safety program.

#### (2) Distribution of materials to employees

The items purchased pursuant to this subsection shall be distributed to employees of the Corps of Engineers to advance the goals of the safety program.

#### (b) Employee recognition

The Secretary is authorized to incur necessary expenses for the honorary recognition of the outstanding safety performance of employees of the Corps of Engineers. Such recognition may be in the form of certificates, plaques, cash, or other forms of awards.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated $350,000 for each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1992, for carrying out the purposes of this section.

(Pub. L. 102–580, title II, §210, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4830.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 3 of Pub. L. 102–580, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-095 August 12, 2004

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING AUGUST 17 ON PLANNED

APPLICATION FOR ADVANCED CANDU REACTOR DESIGN

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

(AECL) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) on August 17 in Rockville, Md., to

discuss the planned design certification application from AECL for its Advanced Candu Reactor 700.

The meeting will be held at the Ramada Inn, 1775 Rockville Pike, accessible from the

Twinbrook stop on the Red Line of Washington’s Metro subway, from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. The

discussions will include NRC presentations to AECL and the CNSC concerning how the design

certification review will proceed. The meeting agenda is available on the agency’s web site, and can be

viewed by entering accession number ML042180230 at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html .

After the business portion of the meeting, but before the meeting adjourns, members of the

public will be invited to discuss the review process with NRC staff. For more information on the

meeting, contact Amy Cubbage at 301-415-2875 or via email at aec@nrc.gov .

###
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 7, 2010 

d0107 

Order 

 

January 7, 2010 

140294 & (20) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140294 

 COA: 294667 

Wayne CC: 09-015867-AR 

MARY M. WATERSTONE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The 

Court of Appeals shall consider whether the Attorney General’s prosecution of the 

defendant is consistent with the requirements of Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct 

1.7, 1.9, and 1.10, and with Attorney General v Public Service Commission, 243 Mich 

App 487 (2000). We further DIRECT the Court of Appeals to issue an opinion within 56 

days of the date of this order. We leave it to the discretion of the Court of Appeals 

whether to order oral argument or further briefing. We further ORDER that district court 

proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. In all other respects, leave 

to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 We do not retain jurisdiction. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal. 

 CORRIGAN, J., states as follows: 

 

 I am not participating because I may be a witness in this case.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Zoel N. Lynch, Respondent, against Kathleen King et al., Appellants.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 823.]
#### Autocar Sales *&*Service Company, Inc., v. Leo Levine et al., Copartners under the Name of Levine Moving & Storage Company.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                         |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ Neal Ludeke                                                                                                              |   |
| Neal                  Ludeke                                                                                                 |   |
| Chief                      Financial Officer of Richman AmericanCredit                      Corp., Manager of the Registrant |   |
| March 12, 2008                                                                                                               |   |

----
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 05-150 November 4, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, NOV. 14-16

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will

meet Nov. 14-16 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the NRC’s plans for the

implementation of the Environmental Protection Agency’s dose standard for the proposed geologic

repository at Yucca Mountain after 10,000 years. There will also be discussion on low-level radioactive

waste.

The committee reports to and advises the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management.

The sessions on Monday and Tuesday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. The session on

Wednesday will run from 10 a.m. to noon. The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s

Two White Flint North Building, at 11545 Rockville Pike. 

Anyone wanting to use video teleconferencing to observe the meeting should contact Theron

Brown, at 301-415-8066 at least five days before the meeting to ensure availability.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2005/ . Individuals interesting in making

statements or those seeking more information should contact Sharon Steele, at 301-415-6805. 

###
August 6, 2009 

GENEVA PIPE 

Concrete products. concrete reliability 

The Honorable Lisa Jackson 

Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency 

Room 3000, Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Washington, D. C. 20460 

Re: Coal combustion products ; 

Dear Ms . Jackson : 

r 1 ; , p-_ 

3 AN 

It has come to my attention that numerous entities have approached EPA in an effort to re- categorize coal combustion by-products, specifically fly ash, from a by-product of beneficial use to that of a by-product to be considered hazardous waste. You should be aware that the beneficial use of this particular product has increased significantly in recent years. 

When used in the manufacturing of concrete products many benefits are derived from the use of this by-product. It improves the ultimate compressive and flexural strength of the products . It also makes our products less permeable . The mitigation of alkali aggregate reactivity increases the lifetime of the concrete product by making it less corrosive while increasing durability . This type of by-product use should be applauded by the EPA. 

Currently, there is pending action at the EPA that we believe will force these coal combustion products to be regulated under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), or a hybrid approach of regulation under Subtitle C for disposal purposes but not 

as a hazardous waste for beneficial use. This scenario would severely impact the concrete community. Some state regulations actually prohibit the beneficial use of hazardous waste . This would severely impact the cost structure in those particular states . Most state DOT's are encouraging the use of fly ash due to the product enhancement qualities. 

We feel that the use of fly ash should not be re-categorized. Its current status meets the spirit of the EPA by finding a need and use for a by-product material and recycling it . It not only improves 

our product, it enhances it, and in its hardened concrete state it is not a hazardous material. Re- categorizing this product will severely impact the cost of concrete across the country and is not sound governmental regulation . 

Phillip R. OaTe 

Corporate Marketing Director 

Geneva Pipe Company 

Orem, Utah 

1465 West 400 North, Orem. Utah $4057 www.genevapfpe.cam 

T:$01 .22S 2416 F .801 2P5,2457 Toll Free 888,225.241b 
H C o~ ~ 

W O tn 

VO O 

Od'N-qP 

o , op 

> O ~~ W 

0 

I, .a4~0 

rt ll l ~ ° 

l . o 

O J 

°~liNn o o 

aa 

e ch 

- 

LPI 

W 

a 

a 

W 

Z 

W 

a 

a 0 

0 a v .. v 

w 

x 

j , 

© ~ o 

,4 t- 4) 1 115 

J -- T 

w 4 

u 

~~ 3 

, . 

a°- ,° 

.~:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

d0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140648

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140648 COA: 295088 Wayne CC: 08-014673-FC; DWAYNE CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS , 08-014708-FC; 08-014710-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 5, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.