alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1640.6 Methods of providing information.

The TSP or its record keeper will furnish the information described in this part to participants by making it available on the TSP website. A participant can request paper copies of that information by calling the ThriftLine, submitting a request through the TSP website, or by writing to the TSP record keeper.

[87 FR 31680, May 24, 2022]
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 17, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 17, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22D0352. IN THE INTEREST OF F. C. A. et al., CHILDREN (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 202466 202467
Strafford,

Dec., 1897.

#### State *v.*Jacques.

One who keeps a restaurant open on the Lord’s day for the sale of food, to be eaten on the premises, may be convicted of keeping a shop open on Sunday for the reception of company.

Complaint, for keeping a shop open on Sunday for the reception of company. The defendant testified that he kept his place open on Sunday afternoon, and a few people were in there; that he sold sandwiches, pies, ice cream, and frankforts, which were eaten in the shop. There were probably a hundred people in the shop that day.

■ The defendant requested the court to charge the jury that all his sales were of the necessaries of life. The court declined to give the instructions, and, subject to exception, charged the jury that the buying the food and eating it on the premises was a violation of the law and would authorize the jury to find a verdict against the defendant. The jury returned a verdict of guilty.

*William F. Nason,*solicitor, for the state.

*William 8.*Pierce,[for the defendant.

Wallace, J.

‘-‘No person shall keep his shop, warehouse, cellar, restaurant, or workshop open for the reception of company, or shall sell or expose for sale any merchandise whatsoever on the Lord’s day; but this section shall not be construed to prevent the entertainment of boarders, nor the sale of milk, bread, and other necessaries of life, nor drugs and medicines.” P. S., *c. 271, s.*5. One of the offences created by this statute is the keeping open a shop, restaurant, or other similar place for the reception of company on Sunday. When the defendant kept open his shop on Sunday for the reception of the people who came there, and entertained them with food and ice cream which he sold them to be eaten on the premises, he committed the offence *221charged, unless what he did came within the exception in the statute allowing the sale of the necessaries of life. One effect of the exception is to restrict the statute so that it will not apply to “the sale of milk, bread, and other necessaries of life.” It does not, however, permit the keeping open on Sunday of shops, restaurants, and other places named, for the reception of company. The opening of a shop on Sunday, and the sale of food and ice cream to be eaten upon the premises, or furnishing similar entertainment, is a keeping open of the place for the reception of company within the meaning of the statute, to which the excepting clause does not apply. To give the exception any greater effect would be to emasculate the statute and prevent it from accomplishing the object intended, which is to prevent shops, restaurants, and other similar places from being open for the reception of company and the transaction of their regular business on Sunday. There was no error in refusing to charge the jury as requested, or in the instructions given, which, construed in view of the facts, were in effect that the selling of food to be eaten on the premises was a violation of law.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
§ 330.405 Agency placement assistance. An agency that separates a preference eligible from a restricted position by reduction in force under part 351 of this chapter because of a contracting out situation covered in § 330.404 must, consistent with § 330.603, advise the employee of the opportunity to participate in available career transition programs. The agency is also responsible for: ( a ) Applying OMB's policy directives on the preference eligible's right of first refusal for positions that are contracted out to the private sector; and
( b ) Cooperating with State units as designated or created under title I of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to retrain displaced preference eligibles for other continuing positions.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 3 30 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 1 16 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
§ 1850.160 Communications. ( a ) OSC shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) OSC shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by OSC. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, OSC shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with a disability.
( ii ) OSC need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where OSC communicates with parties by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf individuals or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with individuals with impaired hearing.
( b ) OSC shall ensure that interested individuals, including individuals with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) OSC shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, if any, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require OSC to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where OSC personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, OSC has the burden of proving that compliance with this section would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the Special Counsel or the Special Counsel's designee after considering all OSC resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, OSC shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
#### Whitman Clark et al., Respondents, *v.*The Village of Dunkirk et al., Appellants.

(Argued December 9, 1878;

decided December 17, 1878.)

*Francis S. Edwards*for appellants.

*Thomas P. Grosvenor*for respondents.

Agree to affirm without opinion.

All concur, except Folger, Andrews, and Earl, JJ., not voting.

Judgment affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alamo Group Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Richard J. Wehrle, Vice President, Corporate Controller and PrincipalAccounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, asadopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The Form 10-Q fully complies withthe requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
-  The information contained in the Form10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

| August 10, 2009 | /s/Richard  J. Wehrle                      |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|
|            | Richard  J. Wehrle                         |
|            | Vice President  & Corporate Controller |
|            | (Principal  Accounting Officer)            |
#### § 302.106 Vacancy announcements.

When an agency announces a vacancy in the excepted service, the announcement must contain a reasonable accommodation statement that complies with requirements in part 330, subpart A of this chapter.

[66 FR 63906, Dec. 11, 2001, as amended at 75 FR 67593, Nov. 3, 2010]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LONARSH WILLIAMS, DOC #300573, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D16-233 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; John K. Stargel, Judge. James Domineck, Jr., Lakeland, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, November 10, 2004, at the Sunnyslope Fire Station, Rural County Fire District #1, 206 Easy Street, Wenatchee, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 3 p.m. During this meeting we will share information on new developments relating to the Northwest Forest Plan, an update on Burned Area Recovery projects, report on fuels reduction and fuels accomplishments in 2004, discuss the Healthy Forest Restoration Act as it relates to the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forest, and discuss future needs for a Snoqualimie Pass Adaptive Management Area Subcommittee. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-9200.

Dated: October 19, 2004.

Paul Hart,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.

[FR Doc. 04-23812  Filed 10-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 1620.14 Payment to the TSP record keeper. ( a ) The employing authority of a cooperative extension service employee (described at § 1620.11(a)) is responsible for transmitting employer and employee contributions to the TSP record keeper.
( b ) The employing authority of a union employee or an Intergovernmental Personnel Act employee (described at § 1620.11(b) and (c), respectively) is responsible for transmitting employer and employee contributions to the employee's Federal agency of record. Employee contributions will be deducted from the employee's actual pay. The employee's agency of record is responsible for transmitting the employer and employee's contributions to the TSP record keeper in accordance with its procedures. The employee's election form (TSP-1) will be filed in the employee's official personnel folder or other similar file maintained by the employing authority.
[64 FR 31057, June 9, 1999, as amended at 87 FR 31679, May 24, 2022]
#### Josephine L. Bond, Respondent, v. Frederick H. Walker, as Executor, etc., of Alva S. Walker, Deceased, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No oninion. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
§ 148.85 Subsequent importations for the personal or family use of diplomatic, consular and other privileged personnel. The privilege of importing free of duty and without the filing of any entry articles for personal or family use, but not as an accommodation for others or for sale or other commercial use, shall be granted upon the request of the Department of State and upon appropriate instructions from the United States Customs Service in each instance, to the following: ( a ) Ambassadors, ministers, chargés d'affaires, secretaries, counselors and attachés of foreign embassies and legations accredited to the United States under subheading 9806.00.40, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) (19 U.S.C. 1202);
( b ) Other representatives, officers and employees of foreign governments, under subheading 9806.00.50, HTSUS; and
( c ) Other persons designated pursuant to statute or pursuant to treaties between the United States and the countries which they represent, under subheading 9806.00.55, HTSUS.
[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51266, Dec. 21, 1988]
#### § 212.22 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the adversary adjudication, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 212.25.
#### Rosario Presimone, Respondent, v. William Flanagan, Defendant, Impleaded with Rocco Scocco, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
exv10w60



 







RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003



Exhibit 10.60




Kevin M. Webb

8901 Iron Gate Court

Potomac, MD 20854 USA


Dear Kevin:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Kevin M. Webb
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: April 14, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 55,000

Vesting Schedule: 3-year Vesting



18,333 on 04/14/2004

18,333 on 04/14/2005

18,334 on 04/14/2006


By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Kevin M. Webb

	 	Date: ________________
	                     Kevin M. Webb
	 	 






Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
###### Editorial Note on Part 352

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

#### § 352.202 Request for Letter of Authority.

When an agency believes that an emergency situation is so critical as to justify offers of reemployment rights, it may request OPM to issue a Letter of Authority. In submitting the request the agency shall present its justification in terms of the standards provided in § 352.203.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-016 March 30, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO DISCUSS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Rochester Gas

and Electric (RG&E) Corp. on Tuesday, April 6, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual

assessment of safety performance at the R.E. Ginna nuclear power plant. RG&E operates the

plant, which is located in Ontario, N.Y.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at

1 p.m. at the Ontario Country Club, 2101 Country Club Lane in Ontario. Before the session is

adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the plant’s safety

performance, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In

addition, NRC staff will provide a brief overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process

works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office to plant officials addresses the performance

of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/ginn_2003q4.pdf .

 Overall, the Ginna plant operated safely and met all cornerstone objectives during the

period. (Cornerstones are measures of plant performance.) Therefore, at this time the NRC

plans to conduct only baseline inspections at the site through September 30, 2005.

 The safety significance of one inspection finding by the NRC remains under review. 

That finding concerns the fire resistance of the cable tunnel escape hatch. The NRC conducted a

site visit during the week of March 15 to gather additional information regarding the significance

of the issue. Based on that information, a decision will be made whether further inspections are

needed.
 During the first quarter of the assessment period, there was an inspection finding

concerning the failure of the off-site emergency siren feedback system. However, an NRC

supplemental inspection conducted in April 2003 concluded that a sufficiently broad evaluation

of the issue had been conducted by RG&E and that corrective actions were adequate to address

the underlying causes of the violation.

 With regard to security issues, the letter points out that the NRC has issued several

orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness

since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to

review the implementation of these requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators

in response to changing threat conditions. The NRC will continue security inspections during

2004.

 Current performance information for the Ginna plant is available on the NRC web site

at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/GINN/ginn_chart.html .

 #
§ 293.107 Special safeguards for automated records. ( a ) In addition to following the security requirements of § 293.106 of this part, managers of automated personnel records shall establish administrative, technical, physical, and security safeguards for data about individuals in automated records, including input and output documents, reports, punched cards, magnetic tapes, disks, and on-line computer storage. The safeguards must be in writing to comply with the standards on automated data processing physical security issued by the National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, and, as a minimum, must be sufficient to: ( 1 ) Prevent careless, accidental, or unintentional disclosure, modification, or destruction of identifiable personal data;
( 2 ) Minimize the risk that skilled technicians or knowledgeable persons could improperly obtain access to, modify, or destroy identifiable personnel data;
( 3 ) Prevent casual entry by unskilled persons who have no official reason for access to such data;
( 4 ) Minimize the risk of an unauthorized disclosure where use is made of identifiable personal data in testing of computer programs;
( 5 ) Control the flow of data into, through, and from agency computer operations;
( 6 ) Adequately protect identifiable data from environmental hazards and unneccessary exposure; and
( 7 ) Assure adequate internal audit procedures to comply with these procedures.
( b ) The disposal of identifiable personal data in automated files is to be accomplished in such a manner as to make the data unobtainable to unauthorized personnel. Unneeded personal data stored on reusable media such as magnetic tapes and disks must be erased prior to release of the media for reuse.