alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2077]

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 78 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; Nashville, Tennessee

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for `` . . . 
the establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson 
County, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 78, submitted an application to 
the Board (FTZ Docket B-41-2018, docketed June 28, 2018) for authority 
to reorganize under the ASF with a service area of the Counties of 
Cannon, Cheatham, Davidson, Dickson, Macon, Maury, Montgomery, 
Robertson, Rutherford, Smith, Sumner, Trousdale, Williamson and Wilson, 
Tennessee in and adjacent to the Nashville Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, FTZ 78's existing Sites 6 and 7 would be 
categorized as magnet sites, and existing Sites 13, 14 and 15 would be 
categorized as usage-driven sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (83 FR 31368, July 5, 2018) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 78 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone, to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate 
authority for Site 7 if not activated within five years from the month 
of approval, and to an ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that 
would terminate authority for Sites 13, 14 and 15 if no foreign-status 
merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose within three 
years from the month of approval.

    Dated: December 13, 2018.
Christian B. Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-27427 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
#### In the Matter of John A. Cosgrove, Respondent. Mayer Rosenholz, Appellant.

Petitioner is not *“*the owner of the land ” within the meaning of section 275 of the Real Property Law. He is successor in interest merely of two of an unspecified number of legatees who, at best, are to share in personalty, namely, proceeds of the sale of realty in accordance with a mandatory direction contained in a will. *(Delafield*V. *Barlow,*107 N. Y. 535; *McDonald*v. *O’Hara,*144 N. Y. 566.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
§ 2604.401 Policy. ( a ) *Foreseeable harm standard.* A requested record will not be withheld from inspection or copying unless it comes within one of the classes of records exempted by 5 U.S.C. 552 and OGE reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption described in 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or is prohibited by law. Nothing in this paragraph requires disclosure of information that is otherwise prohibited from disclosure by law, or otherwise exempted from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
( b ) *Pledge of confidentiality.* Information obtained from any individual or organization, furnished in reliance on a provision for confidentiality authorized by applicable statute, Executive Order or regulation, will not be disclosed to the extent it can be withheld under one of the exemptions. However, this paragraph (b) does not itself authorize the giving of any pledge of confidentiality by any officer or employee of OGE.
( c ) *Exception for law enforcement information.* OGE may treat records compiled for law enforcement purposes as not subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act when: ( 1 ) The investigation or proceeding involves a possible violation of criminal law;
( 2 ) There is reason to believe that the subject of the investigation or proceeding is unaware of its pendency; and
( 3 ) The disclosure of the existence of the records could reasonably be expected to interfere with the enforcement proceedings.
( d ) *Partial application of exemptions.* Any reasonably segregable portion of a record will be provided to any person requesting the record after deletion of the portions which are exempt under this subpart.
[80 FR 57073, Sept. 22, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 94216, Dec. 23, 2016]
NRC NEWSUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-033                                                    July 6 , 2006CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416       E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO PRESENT RESULTS OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEWAT AREVA COMMERCIAL FUEL PLANT ON JULY 13 IN LYNCHBURG

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with AREVA NP, Inc., management inLynchburg, Va., at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, July 13, to discuss the results of a review of regulatorysafety performance at the company’s commercial nuclear fuel fabrication plant.

The meeting will be held on the first floor of the company’s corporate office at 3315 Old ForestRoad in Lynchburg and will be open to observation by interested members of the public and the newsmedia.  The meeting will be between AREVA and the NRC, and NRC officials will be available at theend of the business portion, before the meeting is adjourned, to answer questions from observers.

The NRC staff assessed performance at AREVA for a  period from May 2, 2004 until April 21,2006, in the areas of operational safety, radiological controls, facility support and  licensing.  

Dr. William D. Travers, Administrator of the NRC Region II office in Atlanta, said the plantoperated safely during the time of the NRC assessment.  He said “the NRC continually reviewsregulatory safety performance at AREVA and at all of the nation’s other licensed nuclear facilities.” He added that “this meeting is an opportunity for us to discuss safety performance with the companyand with interested  members of the  press and residents living near the plant.”

A copy of the NRC letter to the company regarding the review is publicly available on theinternet in the NRC’s Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS) atwww.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (ML061590518 for the meeting announcement and ML061460448 for the performance report.

###
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kathi A. Anderson,
Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
      10, 2010
              By: /s/ Katherine A.
    AndersonKatherine
      A. AndersonChief
      Accounting OfficerRepros
      Therapeutics Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Repros and will be retained by Repros and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 2421.2 Terms defined in 5 U.S.C. 7103(a); General Counsel; Assistant Secretary. ( a ) The terms *person, employee, agency, labor organization, dues, Authority, Panel, collective bargaining agreement, grievance, supervisor, management official, collective bargaining, confidential employee, conditions of employment, professional employee, exclusive representative, firefighter,* and *United States,* as used in this subchapter shall have the meanings set forth in 5 U.S.C. 7103(a). The terms *covered employee, employee, employing office,* and *agency,* when used in connection with the Presidential and Executive Office Accountability Act, 3 U.S.C. 401 *et seq.,* shall have the meaning set out in 3 U.S.C. 401(b), and 431(b) and (d)(2). Employees who are employed in the eight offices listed in 3 U.S.C. 431(d)(2) shall be excluded from coverage if the Authority determines that such exclusion is required because of a conflict of interest, an appearance of a conflict of interest, or the President's or Vice President's constitutional responsibilities, in addition to the exemptions currently set forth in 5 U.S.C. 7103(a).
( b ) The term *General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the Authority.
( c ) The term *Assistant Secretary* means the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor-Management Relations.
[45 FR 3497, Jan. 17, 1980, as amended at 63 FR 46158, Aug. 31, 1998]
#### Sigma Corporation, Respondent, v. City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur; Taylor, J., dissents, with the following memorandum: I dissent and vote to reverse the order and to dismiss the supplemental complaint upon the ground that each of the causes of action therein alleged is barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations. Upon this record, each of those causes vested in County Securities, Inc., on June 23, 1936. As matter of law each became vested in plaintiff on June 5, 1942, when County Securities, Inc., assigned those causes to plaintiff, which, in effect, commenced action thereon against defendant (Civ. Prac. ’Act, § 245-b), by service, pursuant to an order dated July 31, 1942, of the supplemental complaint containing those causes of action, each of which in legal effect seeks to recover on implied contract for money had and received. When a new and distinct liability is asserted by an amended pleading, as to which the Statute of Limitations has run before the service of the amended pleading, the statute is a good defense. *(Harriss*v. *Tams,*258 N. Y. 229; *McConnell*v. *Caribbean Petroleum Co.,*278 N. Y. 189; *Clark*v. *Title Guarantee & Trust Co.,*259 App. Div. 136, affd. 284 N. Y. 619.)
Exhibit 11
 AmSurg Corp.
Earnings Per Share
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
  Three Months Ended September 30,
    
    Nine Months Ended September 30,Per
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    PerEarnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share
    
    Earnings
    
    Shares
    
    Share(Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    Amount
    
    (Numerator)
    
    (Denominator)
    
    Amount2008:Net earnings from
continuing operations
per common share
(basic)
    
    $
    12,583
    
    
    
    31,719
    
    
    $
    0.40
    
    
    $
    36,650
    
    
    
    31,499
    
    
    $
    1.16Effect of dilutive securities
options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    584
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    519Net earnings from
continuing operations
per common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    12,583
    
    
    
    32,303
    
    
    $
    0.39
    
    
    $
    36,650
    
    
    
    32,018
    
    
    $
    1.14Net earnings per common
share (basic)
    
    $
    12,384
    
    
    
    31,719
    
    
    $
    0.39
    
    
    $
    35,334
    
    
    
    31,499
    
    
    $
    1.12Effect of dilutive securities
options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    584
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    519Net earnings per common
share (diluted)
    
    $
    12,384
    
    
    
    32,303
    
    
    $
    0.38
    
    
    $
    35,334
    
    
    
    32,018
    
    
    $
    1.102007:Net earnings from
continuing operations
per common share
(basic)
    
    $
    10,372
    
    
    
    30,778
    
    
    $
    0.34
    
    
    $
    30,399
    
    
    
    30,455
    
    
    $
    1.00Effect of dilutive securities
options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    467Net earnings from
continuing operations
per common share
(diluted)
    
    $
    10,372
    
    
    
    31,175
    
    
    $
    0.33
    
    
    $
    30,399
    
    
    
    30,922
    
    
    $
    0.98Net earnings per common
share (basic)
    
    $
    9,990
    
    
    
    30,778
    
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    31,459
    
    
    
    30,455
    
    
    $
    1.03Effect of dilutive securities
options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    467Net earnings per common
share (diluted)
    
    $
    9,990
    
    
    
    31,175
    
    
    $
    0.32
    
    
    $
    31,459
    
    
    
    30,922
    
    
    $
    1.02
### §1956. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Administrator

The term "Administrator" means the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

#### (2) Interagency Committee

The term "Interagency Committee" means the Interagency Marine Debris Coordinating Committee established under section 1954 of this title.

#### (3) Marine debris

The term "marine debris" means any persistent solid material that is manufactured or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment or the Great Lakes.

#### (4) MARPOL; Annex V; Convention

The terms "MARPOL", "Annex V", and "Convention" have the meaning given those terms under section 1901(a) of this title.

#### (5) Program

The term "Program" means the Marine Debris Program established under section 1952 of this title.

#### (6) Severe marine debris event

The term "severe marine debris event" means atypically large amounts of marine debris caused by a natural disaster, including a tsunami, flood, landslide, or hurricane, or other source.

#### (7) State

The term "State" means—

(A) any State of the United States that is impacted by marine debris within its seaward or Great Lakes boundaries;

(B) the District of Columbia;

(C) American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands; and

(D) any other territory or possession of the United States, or separate sovereign in free association with the United States, that is impacted by marine debris within its seaward boundaries.

(Pub. L. 109–449, §7, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3338; Pub. L. 112–213, title VI, §608, Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1578.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2012—Par. (2). Pub. L. 112–213, §608(1), substituted "section 1954 of this title" for "section 1914 of this title".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 112–213, §608(2), added par. (3) and struck out former par. (3). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The term 'United States exclusive economic zone' means the zone established by Presidential Proclamation Numbered 5030, dated March 10, 1983, including the ocean waters of the areas referred to as 'eastern special areas' in article 3(1) of the Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Maritime Boundary, signed June 1, 1990."

Par. (5). Pub. L. 112–213, §608(3)–(5), redesignated par. (7) as (5), struck out "Prevention and Removal" before "Program", and struck out former par. (5). Prior to amendment, text of par. (5) read as follows: "The term 'navigable waters' means waters of the United States, including the territorial sea."

Par. (6). Pub. L. 112–213, §608(6), added par. (6) and struck out former par. (6). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The term 'territorial sea' means the waters of the United States referred to in Presidential Proclamation No. 5928, dated December 27, 1988."

Pars. (7), (8). Pub. L. 112–213, §608(7), redesignated par. (8) as (7). Former par. (7) redesignated (5).
### §6116. Special delivery postage allowance for President of Senate

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized and directed to procure and furnish each fiscal year (commencing with the fiscal year ending September 30, 1982) to the President of the Senate, upon request by such person, United States special delivery postage stamps in such amount as may be necessary for the mailing of postal matters arising in connection with his official business.

(Pub. L. 97–51, §127(a)(1), Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 965.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 42a of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-037 March 20, 2006

NRC CREATES TASK FORCE TO EXAMINE TRITIUM ISSUE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said today it has assembled a group of experts from its

offices around the nation to examine the issue of inadvertent, unmonitored releases of radioactive

liquids containing tritium from U.S. commercial nuclear power plants.

Agency leaders directed creation of the group earlier this year following reports of unmonitored

releases of water containing tritium.

“The available information on these releases shows no hazard to the public,” said NRC

Executive Director for Operations Luis Reyes. “Nonetheless, we need to conduct an in-depth review to

see if the NRC needs to take additional action of a broad nature.”

At the same time the NRC decided to establish the tritium study group, they also decided to

create a page on the NRC Web site to provide the public the latest available information on tritium

issues. This information can be accessed at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html .

Eleven of the 12 task force members come from the agency’s Offices of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards and Nuclear Regulatory Research, as well as from

regional offices. The twelfth, a representative of state government, is being selected. The group will

report to Bill Kane, the Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs, and is

required to complete its review by Aug. 31. A written report summarizing the task force’s findings will

be issued late this year.

The task force is required to address several topics, including:

– A general assessment of the potential public health impact from these releases;

– How the issue was communicated to the public, state and local officials, other federal

agencies, Congress and other interested groups;

– A review of other inadvertent releases at nuclear power plants, including decommissioning

sites, from 1996 to the present;

– Industry actions in response to the releases, including the timing of remediation efforts; and,

– NRC oversight of inadvertent releases, both under the Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) and

the process in place prior to the ROP.
The task force can also consider issues not listed in its charter, and can identify issues for longer-term

review by NRC staff.

The task force’s charter is available on the NRC’s Web site by entering ML060690186 at this

address: http://adamswebsearch.nrc.gov/dologin.htm .

###
### §645. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–608, §1(13), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1969

Section, Pub. L. 85–701, §5, Aug. 21, 1958, 72 Stat. 701; Pub. L. 89–348, §2(5), Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1312, required Secretary of the Interior to report to Congress on operations of programs authorized pursuant to this chapter.
### §712. Disposition of proceeds of condemned stores issued to National Guard

The following shall be covered into the Treasury:

(1) The proceeds from sales of condemned stores issued to the National Guard of a State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands, and not charged against its allotment.

(2) The net proceeds from collections made from any person to reimburse the United States for the loss or destruction of, or damage to, property described in clause (1).

(3) Stoppage against members of the National Guard for the loss or destruction of, or damage to, property described in clause (1).

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 616; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(b)(3), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 712 | 32:45. | June 3, 1916, ch. 134, §88, 39 Stat. 205; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §3(5), 65 Stat. 708. |

The introductory clause is substituted for the words "shall be covered into the Treasury of the United States" and "as shall also". The words "United States" are substituted for the word "Government". The words "members of the National Guard" are substituted for the words "officers and enlisted men".

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Par. (1). Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands" for "State or Territory, Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia".

1988—Par. (1). Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".