Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 62407

Bacitracin zinc in 

grams per ton 

Combinations 

in grams per 

ton 

Indications for use Limitations Sponsor 

(i) 4 to 50 ................... .................... Chickens: for increased rate of weight gain 

and improved feed efficiency

Growing chickens 046573

048164

(ii) 4 to 50 .................. .................... Turkeys and pheasants: for increased rate 

of weight gain and improved feed efficiency

Growing turkeys and 

pheasants

046573

*******

* * * * *

§ 558.128 [Amended]

■ 11. Section 558.128 is amended in 

paragraph (b)(1) by removing ‘‘053389’’

and by adding in its place ‘‘048164’’; and 

in the tables in paragraphs (e)(1), (e)(2), 

(e)(3), (e)(4), and (e)(5) in the ‘‘Sponsor’’

column by removing ‘‘053389’’ wherever 

it appears and by adding in its place 

‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.140 [Amended]

■ 12. Section 558.140 is amended in 

paragraph (a) by removing ‘‘053389’’ and 

by adding in its place ‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.145 [Amended]

■ 13. Section 558.145 is amended in 

paragraph (a)(2) by removing ‘‘053389’’

and by adding in its place ‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.195 [Amended]

■ 14. Section 558.195 is amended in the 

table in paragraph (e)(2)(iii) in the 

‘‘Limitations’’ and ‘‘Sponsor’’ columns 

by removing ‘‘053389’’ and by adding in 

its place ‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.355 [Amended]

■ 15. Section 558.355 is amended in 

paragraph (f)(1)(xiv)(b) by removing 

‘‘053389’’ and by adding in its place 

‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.450 [Amended]

■ 16. Section 558.450 is amended in 

paragraph (a)(2) by removing ‘‘053389’’

and by adding in its place ‘‘048164’’; in 

the table in paragraphs (d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(v), 

(d)(1)(vii), and (d)(1)(viii) in the 

‘‘Sponsor’’ column by removing 

‘‘053389’’ wherever it appears and by 

adding in its place ‘‘048164’’; and in the 

table in paragraph (d)(1)(ix) in the 

‘‘Limitations’’ column by removing 

‘‘053389’’ wherever it appears and by 

adding in its place ‘‘048164’’.

■ 17. Section 558.550 is amended in 

paragraphs (d)(1)(xv)(c) and (d)(1)(xvi)(c) 

by removing ‘‘053389’’ and by adding in 

its place ‘‘048164’’; and by revising 

paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (b) to 

read as follows:

§ 558.550 Salinomycin.

(a) Specifications. Type A medicated 

articles containing 30 or 60 grams of 

salinomycin activity per pound (as 

salinomycin sodium biomass).

(b) Approvals. See sponsors in 

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter for use as in 

paragraph (d) of this section:

(1) No. 046573 for use as in paragraph 

(d) of this section.

(2) No. 057926 for use as in 

paragraphs (d)(1)(i), (d)(1)(iii) through 

(d)(1)(xvi), (d)(2)(i), and (d)(3)(i) of this 

section.

(3) No. 048164 for use as in 

paragraphs (d)(1)(xv) and (d)(1)(xvi) of 

this section.

* * * * *

§ 558.600 [Amended]

■ 18. Section 558.600 is amended in the 

table in paragraph (e)(1)(iii) in the 

‘‘Limitations’’ and ‘‘Sponsor’’ columns 

by removing ‘‘053389’’ and by adding in 

its place ‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.625 [Amended]

■ 19. Section 558.625 is amended in 

paragraph (b)(89) by removing ‘‘053389’’

and by adding in its place ‘‘048164’’.

§ 558.630 [Amended]

■ 20. Section 558.630 is amended in 

paragraph (b)(10) by removing ‘‘053389’’

and by adding in numerical sequence 

‘‘048164’’.

Dated: October 14, 2004.

Steven D. Vaughn,

Director, Office of New Animal Drug 

Evaluation, Center for Veterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 04–23854 Filed 10–25–04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

National Security Agency/Central 

Security Services 

32 CFR Part 322

[NSA Regulation 10–35] 

Privacy Act; Implementation

AGENCY: National Security Agency/

Central Security Services.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: The National Security 

Agency; Central Security Services 

(NSA/CSS) is adding an exemption rule 

for the system of records GNSA 20, 

entitled ‘NSA Police Operational Files’. 

The exemptions increase the value of 

the system of records for law 

enforcement purposes. 

The proposed rule was published on 

August 9, 2004, at 69 FR 48183. No 

comments were received; therefore, the 

National Security Agency/Central 

Security Services is adopting the rule as 

published below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 12, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Anne Hill at (301) 688–6527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Executive Order 12866

It has been determined that this 

Privacy Act rule for the Department of 

Defense does not constitute ‘significant 

regulatory action’. Analysis of the rule 

indicates that it does not have an annual 

effect on the economy of $100 million 

or more; does not create a serious 

inconsistency or otherwise interfere 

with an action taken or planned by 

another agency; does not materially alter 

the budgetary impact of entitlements, 

grants, user fees, or loan programs or the 

rights and obligations of recipients 

thereof; does not raise novel legal or 

policy issues arising out of legal 

mandates, the President’s priorities, or 

the principles set forth in Executive 

Order 12866 (1993). 

62408 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 206 / Tuesday, October 26, 2004 / Rules and Regulations 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

It has been determined that this 

Privacy Act rule for the Department of 

Defense does not have significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities because it is 

concerned only with the administration 

of Privacy Act systems of records within 

the Department of Defense. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

It has been determined that this 

Privacy Act rule for the Department of 

Defense imposes no information 

requirements beyond the Department of 

Defense and that the information 

collected within the Department of 

Defense is necessary and consistent 

with 5 U.S.C. 552a, known as the 

Privacy Act of 1974. 

Section 202, Public Law 104–4, 

‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’

It has been determined that this 

Privacy Act rulemaking for the 

Department of Defense does not involve 

a Federal mandate that may result in the 

expenditure by State, local and tribal 

governments, in the aggregate, or by the 

private sector, of $100 million or more 

and that such rulemaking will not 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments. 

Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’

It has been determined that this 

Privacy Act rule for the Department of 

Defense does not have federalism 

implications. The rule does not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the 

National Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

The National Security Agency/Central 

Security Services (NSA/CSS) is adding 

an exemption rule for the system of 

records GNSA 20, entitled ‘NSA Police 

Operational Files’. The proposed rule 

was published on august 9, 2004, at 69 

FR 48183. No comments were received; 

therefore, the National Security Agency/

Central Security Services is adopting the 

rule as published below.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 322

Privacy.

PART 32—[AMENDED]

■ 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR 

part 322 continues to read as follows:

Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 

U.S.C. 552a).

■ 2. Amend § 322.7, by adding a new 

paragraph (q) as follows:

§ 322.7 Exempt systems of records.

* * * * *

(q) GNSA 20. 

(1) System name: NSA Police 

Operational Files. 

(2) Exemption: (i) Investigatory 

material compiled for law enforcement 

purposes, other than material within the 

scope of subsection 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), 

may be exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

552a(k)(2). However, if an individual is 

denied any right, privilege, or benefit for 

which he would otherwise be entitled 

by Federal law or for which he would 

otherwise be eligible, as a result of the 

maintenance of the information, the 

individual will be provided access to 

the information exempt to the extent 

that disclosure would reveal the identity 

of a confidential source. Note: When 

claimed, this exemption allows limited 

protection of investigative reports 

maintained in a system of records used 

in personnel or administrative actions. 

(ii) Records maintained solely for 

statistical research or program 

evaluation purposes and which are not 

used to make decisions on the rights, 

benefits, or entitlement of an individual 

except for census records which may be 

disclosed under 13 U.S.C. 8, may be 

exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(4). 

(iii) Investigatory material compiled 

solely for the purpose of determining 

suitability, eligibility, or qualifications 

for federal civilian employment, 

military service, federal contracts, or 

access to classified information may be 

exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), 

but only to the extent that such material 

would reveal the identity of a 

confidential source. 

(iv) All portions of this system of 

records which fall within the scope of 

5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), (k)(4), and (k)(5) 

may be exempt from the provisions of 

5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), 

(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I) and (f).

(3) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), 

(k)(4), and (k)(5). 

(4) Reasons: (i) From subsection (c)(3) 

because the release of the disclosure 

accounting would place the subject of 

an investigation on notice that they are 

under investigation and provide them 

with significant information concerning 

the nature of the investigation, thus 

resulting in a serious impediment to law 

enforcement investigations. 

(ii) From subsections (d) and (f) 

because providing access to records of a 

civil or administrative investigation and 

the right to contest the contents of those 

records and force changes to be made to 

the information contained therein 

would seriously interfere with and 

thwart the orderly and unbiased 

conduct of the investigation and impede 

case preparation. Providing access rights 

normally afforded under the Privacy Act 

would provide the subject with valuable 

information that would allow 

interference with or compromise of 

witnesses or render witnesses reluctant 

to cooperate; lead to suppression, 

alteration, or destruction of evidence; 

enable individuals to conceal their 

wrongdoing or mislead the course of the 

investigation; and result in the secreting 

of or other disposition of assets that 

would make them difficult or 

impossible to reach in order to satisfy 

any Government claim growing out of 

the investigation or proceeding. 

(iii) From subsection (e)(1) because it 

is not always possible to detect the 

relevance or necessity of each piece of 

information in the early stages of an 

investigation. In some cases, it is only 

after the information is evaluated in 

light of other evidence that its relevance 

and necessity will be clear. 

(iv) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) 

because this system of records is 

compiled for investigative purposes and 

is exempt from the access provisions of 

subsections (d) and (f). 

(v) From subsection (e)(4)(I) because 

to the extent that this provision is 

construed to require more detailed 

disclosure than the broad, generic 

information currently published in the 

system notice, an exemption from this 

provision is necessary to protect the 

confidentiality of sources of information 

and to protect privacy and physical 

safety of witnesses and informants.

Dated: October 20, 2004. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04–23887 Filed 10–25–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD01–04–078] 

RIN 1625–AA00

Safety Zone; Wantagh Parkway 3 

Bridge Over the Sloop Channel, Town 

of Hempstead, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zone in 

the waters surrounding the Wantagh 

Parkway Number 3 Bridge across the 

Sloop Channel in the Town of 

Hempstead, New York. This zone is