alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
OPM Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Floyd, Center for Human Capital 
Management Services, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-2309.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, 
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or 
more SES performance review boards. The board reviews and evaluates the 
initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, and considers recommendations to the appointing authority 
regarding the performance of the senior executive.

Office of Personnel Management.
Kay Coles James,
Director.
    The following have been designated as regular members of the 
Performance Review Board of the Office of Personnel Management:

Paul T. Conway, Chief of Staff--Chair.
Stephen C. Benowitz, Associate Director for Human Resources Products 
and Services.
Steven R. Cohen, Homeland Security Liaison Officer.
John C. Gartland, Director, Office of Congressional Relations.
Doris L. Hausser, Senior Policy Advisor to the Director and Chief Human 
Capital Officer.
Vicki A. Novak, Assistant Administrator for Human Resources and 
Education, National Aeronautics Space Administration.
Marta B. Perez, Associate Director for Human Capital Leadership and 
Merit System Accountability.
Patrick Pizzella, Assistant Secretary for Administration and 
Management/Chief Human Capital Officer, Department of Labor.
Mark A. Robbins, General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 04-24407 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-45-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24553]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (04-119)]


NASA Advisory Council, Space Science Advisory Committee; Meeting.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee (SScAC).

DATES: Monday, November 15, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Tuesday, 
November 16, 2004, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and Wednesday, November 17, 
2004, 8:30 a.m. to 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Newport Beach Marriott, 900 Newport Center Drive, Newport 
Beach, CA 92660.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marian R. Norris, Office of Space 
Science, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546, (202) 358-4452.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--Associate Administrator's Directorate Status Report and Discussion.
--Science Management Processes.
--Committee Reorganization Planning.
--Division Program Status Reports.
--Presentation of Subcommittee Reports.
--Earth Science Research Strategy.

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
to the meeting will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-24553 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-U
### §9307. Civil actions and judgments against surety corporations

(a)(1) A surety corporation providing a surety bond under section 9304 of this title may be sued in a court of the United States having jurisdiction of civil actions on surety bonds in—

(A) the judicial district in which the surety bond was provided; or

(B) the district in which the principal office of the corporation is located.

(2) Under sections 9304–9308 of this title, a surety bond is deemed to be provided in the district—

(A) in which the principal office of the surety corporation is located;

(B) to which the surety bond is returnable;

(C) in which the surety bond is filed; and

(D) in which the person required to provide a surety bond resided when the bond was provided.

(b) In a proceeding against a surety corporation providing a surety bond under section 9304 of this title, the corporation may not deny its power to provide a surety bond or to assume liability.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1049.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9307(a) | 6:10. | |
| 9307(b) | 6:12. | |

In subsection (a)(1), before clause (A), the words "corporation providing a surety bond" are substituted for "company doing business" for consistency. The words "in respect thereof" are omitted as surplus. The words "civil actions on surety bonds" are substituted for "actions or suits upon such recognizance, stipulation, bond, or undertaking" for consistency. In clause (A), the words "the surety bond was provided" are substituted for "such recognizance, stipulation, bond, or undertaking was made or guaranteed" for consistency.

In subsection (a)(2), before clause (A), the words "a surety bond is deemed to be provided" are substituted for "such recognizance, stipulation, bond, or undertaking shall be treated as made or guaranteed" for consistency. In clause (A), the words "principal office of the surety corporation" are substituted for "office" for clarity and consistency. In clause (D), the words "person required to provide a surety bond resided when the bond was provided" are substituted for "principal in such recognizance, stipulation, bond, or undertaking resided when it was made or guaranteed" for consistency.

Subsection (b) is substituted for 6:12 to eliminate unnecessary words and for consistency.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 172 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 172

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities 
 paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining 
                 supplemental security income benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. Quinn, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. 
  Smith of New Jersey, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Serrano, Mrs. 
 McCarthy of New York, Mr. Towns, Mrs. Maloney, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Engel, 
Mr. Nadler, Mr. Weiner, and Mr. Hinchey) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to provide that annuities 
 paid by States to blind veterans shall be disregarded in determining 
                 supplemental security income benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATE ANNUITIES FOR BLIND VETERANS TO BE DISREGARDED IN 
              DETERMINING SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS.

    (a) Income Disregard.--Section 1612(b) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1382a(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (21);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (22) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(23) any annuity paid by a State to the individual (or 
        such spouse) on the basis of the individual's being a veteran 
        (as defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code) and 
        blind, if a law of such State providing for such an annuity was 
        in effect on the date of the enactment of this paragraph.''.
    (b) Resource Disregard.--Section 1613(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1382b(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (12);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (13) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (13) the following:
            ``(14) for the month of receipt and every month thereafter, 
        any annuity paid by a State to the individual (or such spouse) 
        on the basis of the individual's being a veteran (as defined in 
        section 101 of title 38, United States Code) and blind, if a 
        law of such State providing for such an annuity was in effect 
        on the date of the enactment of this paragraph.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to benefits paid for months beginning after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-148 November 23, 2004

NRC REVISES REGULATIONS FOR STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND

COMPONENTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has amended its regulations that apply certain controls to

nuclear power plant structures, systems and components (SSCs), based on their safety significance. 

The change goes into effect Dec. 22, 2004.

NRC regulations require nuclear plants to have conservative safety margins, strict procedural

controls and multiple safety systems to protect public health and safety. Special regulatory controls --

rigorous design qualifications, record-keeping, maintenance and testing requirements -- are used to

ensure that SSCs necessary to safely shut down a nuclear reactor and prevent radioactivity from

traveling off-site will function effectively during and after an accident.

These requirements encompass a very broad scope of SSCs -- some of which are very important

to safety; others of which, experience and new analytical techniques indicate, provide only a minimal

contribution to safety, thereby possibly focusing NRC staff and licensee resources on issues of minor

safety significance.

The new regulation can be voluntarily adopted by plant operators as an alternate set of

requirements. The changes incorporate up-to-date analytic tools and risk insights to further enhance

plant safety by enabling nuclear power plant licensees to more precisely determine the safety

significance of SSCs. If licensees adopt the change, some SSCs of "low safety significance" would be

subject to less stringent requirements than currently exist, although they must remain capable of

performing their safety-related functions. Conversely, some SSCs of greater significance would be

subject to new requirements.

“This enables both nuclear power plant licensees and the NRC to more efficiently focus their

resources on issues of greater safety significance,” said David Matthews, Director of the Division of

Regulatory Improvement Programs in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

The NRC received about 200 public comments on the changes during the agency’s rulemaking

process. Each of the comments was reviewed in detail, and were incorporated as appropriate into the

revised regulations. The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards reviewed the changes in June

2004 and had no objections to their going into effect.
To ensure the new regulations are implemented properly, the NRC staff has developed, for trial

use, Regulatory Guide 1.201, “Guidelines for Categorizing Structures, Systems and Components in

Nuclear Power Plants According to Their Safety Significance.” The current draft of that guide is

available on the NRC’s Web site at this address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/secys/2004/secy2004-0109/attachment5.p

df .

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-04-029]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

November 5, 2004 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-1056 (Final) (Certain Aluminum Plate from South Africa)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before November 18, 2004.)

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 29, 2004.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-24585 Filed 10-29-04; 3:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
### Part B—Genius Prize for Save Our Seas Innovations
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 3 , 2015.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00997

- CR NO. 14

- 14

- 00999

- CR

GARY LEE MOUNT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 144919 5 & 1449196

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant appeals his convictions for aggravated sexual assault and aggravated kidnapping. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which s he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no argua ble grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.2

1978). A copy of counsel’s bri ef was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford

v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the record was provided to him. On November 3 , 201 5 , appellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief. We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s

re sponse, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim
raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Donovan. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1609 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1609

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2003

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, as the ``Admiral 
                  Donald Davis Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 
West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, and known as the Brookfield 
Main Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Admiral Donald 
Davis Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Admiral Donald Davis Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Allan J. Kent,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Allan
J. Kent


------------------





Allan J.
Kent


Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


June 24,
2008
Exhibit 8.1



|                                                   |  |                        |  |                          |  |                  |  |        
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------- |  | -------
|                                                   |  | Subsidiaries           |  |                          |  |                  |  |        
|Legal Name                                         |  | Place of Incorporation |  | Doing Business as        |  | Owenrship (%)(1)
|Transporte Aéreo S.A                               |  | Chile                  |  | LATAM Airlines Chile     |  |                  |  | 99.90% 
|LAN Peru S.A                                       |  | Peru                   |  | LATAM Airlines Peru      |  |                  |  | 70.00% 
|Aerolane, Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A |  | Ecuador                |  | LATAM Airlines Ecuador   |  | Voting           |  | 55.00% 
|                                                   |  |                        |  |                          |  | No Voting        |  | 100.00%
|LAN Argentina S.A                                  |  | Argentina              |  | LATAM Airlines Argentina |  |                  |  | 95.86% 
|Aerovías de Integración Regional, Aires S.A        |  | Colombia               |  | LATAM Airlines Colombia  |  |                  |  | 99.19% 
|TAM S.A                                            |  | Brazil                 |  | TAM (2)                  |  | Voting           |  | 48.99% 
|                                                   |  |                        |  |                          |  | No Voting        |  | 100.00%
|Lan Cargo S.A                                      |  | Chile                  |  | LATAM Airlines Cargo     |  |                  |  | 90.90% 



|(1) | Percentage of equity owned by LATAM Airlines Group S.A. directly or indirectly through subsidiaries or affiliates.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | TAM Linhas Aereas S.A. (TLA), a subsidiary of TAM, does business under the name LATAM Airlines Brazil.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Current Construction Reports

Provides monthly statistics on the number of new privately ownedhousing units completed and under construction for United States andregions.  The report includes both actual and seasonally adjustedestimates for units completed and under construction by number of housing units in structure.  Comparative data are shown forearlier years.  Quarterly statistics on characteristics of new housingappear in selected issues.
The publication is a joint report of the Bureau of the Census and theU.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Publications listed are in the Portable Document Format (PDF). In orderto view these files, you will needthe Adobe(R) Acrobat(R)Reader which is available for free from the Adobe web site. 
**YEAR****C22 -- Housing Completions**2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec

Additional information on ConstructionStatistics
Source:  *U.S. CensusBureau* Last Revised: *Monday, 10-Mar-97 08:36:26 EST*
 Census Bureau Links:   Home · Census 2000 · Subjects A to Z · FAQs · Search · Data Tools · Catalog · Quality · Privacy Policy · Policies · Contact Us
### §4214. Administrative services and support

#### (a) Provision of services

The Under Secretary may provide personnel, facilities, and other administrative services to the Foundation, including reimbursement of expenses, not to exceed the current Federal Government per diem rates, for a period of up to 5 years beginning on December 18, 2020.

#### (b) Reimbursement

The Under Secretary shall require reimbursement from the Foundation for any administrative service provided under subsection (a). The Under Secretary shall deposit any reimbursement received under this subsection into the Treasury to the credit of the appropriations then current and chargeable for the cost of providing such services.

(Pub. L. 116–224, title I, §114, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1079.)
§ 1215.3 Applicability. ( a ) These regulations are to be followed when: ( 1 ) The MSPB is owed a debt by an individual currently employed by another Federal agency;
( 2 ) The MSPB is owed a debt by an individual who is a current employee of the MSPB; or
( 3 ) The MSPB employs an individual who owes a debt to another Federal agency.