alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 1732

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the Williamson

County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse Project, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the ‘‘Williamson

County Water Recycling Act of 2004’’.

(b) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Title XVI of Public Law 102–

575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by inserting after section

1635 the following new section:

‘‘SEC. 1636. WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, WATER RECYCLING AND

REUSE PROJECT.

‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in cooperation with the

Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, is authorized to participate

in the design, planning, and construction of permanent facilities

to reclaim and reuse water in Williamson County, Texas.

‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs of the project

described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total

cost.

‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide funds for

the operation and maintenance of the project described in subsection

(a).’’.
H. R. 1732—2

SEC. 2. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

The table of sections in section 2 of the Reclamation Projects

Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended by inserting

after the item relating to section 1635 the following:

‘‘Sec. 1636. Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse Project.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-138 October 31, 2006

NRC ANNOUNCES OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST A HEARING ON LICENSE RENEWAL

APPLICATION FOR SUSQUEHANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is announcing the opportunity to request a hearing on an

application to renew the operating license for the Susquehanna nuclear power plant, Units 1 and 2, for

an additional 20 years.

The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station is located seven miles northeast of Berwick, Pa. PPL

Susquehanna, LLC, submitted the renewal application Sept. 15. The current operating licenses for

Susquehanna expire July 17, 2022, for Unit 1 and March 23, 2024, for Unit 2.

The NRC staff has determined that the application contains sufficient information for the

agency to formally “docket,” or file, the application and begin its technical review. Docketing the

application does not preclude requesting additional information as the review proceeds; nor does it

indicate whether the Commission will grant the application.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing will be published soon in the Federal Register. 

The deadline for requesting a hearing is 60 days following publication. Petitions may be filed by

anyone whose interest may be affected by the license renewal and who wishes to participate as a party

in the proceeding. 

NRC staff will conduct a public meeting Nov. 15 in the vicinity of the plant to discuss the

license renewal process and the scope of the agency’s environmental review for the license renewal

application. More information about that meeting is contained in the Federal Register notice, and an

additional announcement will be made closer to the date.

A request for hearing and a petition for leave to intervene must be filed with the Secretary of

the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff. Requests may also be submitted by facsimile to (301) 415-1101

or e-mail to HEARINGDOCKET@nrc.gov . A copy should also be submitted to the NRC Office of

General Counsel, by facsimile to (301) 415-3725 or e-mail to OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov .

Information about the license renewal process can be found on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html . The Susquehanna renewal application

is online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/susquehanna.html . 
An NRC review schedule for the Susquehanna nuclear plant will also be posted on the NRC Web site

which will identify the deadline for requesting a hearing. 

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 16, 2017

No. 04-17-00351-CR

Delton Lenard GREEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR7767

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s final motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief was filed on November 13, 2017.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the
"Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Nancy J. Baker, Chief Financial Officer of
Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set her hand hereto as of the 5th day of August, 2008.

/s/NANCY J. BAKERNancy J. Baker,Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date
of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Hussey, Chief Financial Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/James HusseyJames
      HusseyChief
      Financial Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
      Corp., Manager of the RegistrantFebruary
      10, 2010
#### § 2634.906 Review of confidential filer status.

The head of each agency, or an officer designated by the head of the agency for that purpose, will review any complaint by an individual that the individual's position has been improperly determined by the agency to be one which requires the submission of a confidential financial disclosure report pursuant to this subpart. A decision by the agency head or designee regarding the complaint will be final.
### §59w. Norton Basin and Jamaica Bay, New York

The two portions of Norton Basin and Jamaica Bay, New York, that are particularly described in Committee Print 99–58 of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives are hereby declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States for purposes of the navigation servitude.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1168, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4259.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Public Works and Transportation of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of House of Representatives by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress.
#### §§ 2423.13-2423.19 [Reserved]
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Daniel Gonzalez Rodriguez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00778

- CR

Trial court case number: 1380317

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harri s County

On March 26, 2014, Appellant filed his Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief. The motion is GRANTED, in part . Appellant’s brief is due April 15, 2014

, and no fu rther extensions will be considered . If a brief is not file d by April 15, 2014

, this appeal will be abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing at which a determination will be made as to whether Daniel Gonzales Rodriguez wishes to pursue his appeal, and whether or not his appointed counsel, Kurt B. Wentz , has abandoned the appeal and should be allowed to withdraw for appointment of new counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

__

/s/

_Justice Harvey Brown

X Act ing individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 27, 2014
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form
10-KSB of Anscott Industries, Inc. for the Period Ended March 31, 2003, Jack
Belluscio, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Anscott Industries, Inc. hereby Certifies Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.   Such Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 of Form 10-KSB for the period ended
     March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form
     10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Anscott Industries, Inc.


                                 ANSCOTT INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                 By: /s/ Jack Belluscio
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Jack Belluscio
                                    Principal  Executive Officer and
                                    Principal  Financial  Officer


Dated: June 16, 2004
### §52. Park River, Connecticut

The Park River, a minor tributary of the Connecticut River, located in Hartford County, Connecticut, is declared to be a nonnavigable waterway within the meaning of the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

The right of Congress to alter, amend, or repeal this section is expressly reserved.

(May 24, 1937, ch. 246, §§1, 2, 50 Stat. 201.)
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, WU Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |               |  |  |  |                |  |                        
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | June 25, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ WU Yuxiang
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Name:          |  | WU Yuxiang             
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-157200, No. 333-138440, No. 333-101347,
No. 333-33026, and No. 333-79911) and Form S-8 (No. 333-156447, No. 333-101346, and No. 333-75738) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2011 related to our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

LOGO

Winchester, Virginia

March 31, 2011
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Planet Polymer Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, H. M. Busby, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 12, 2004



/s/  H. M. Busby
---------------------------
H. M. Busby
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer



                                       15
§ 2411.7 Format of disclosure. ( a ) After a determination has been made to grant a request in whole or in part, the Solicitor or the IG, as appropriate, will notify the requester in writing. The notice will describe the manner in which the record will be disclosed and will inform the requester of the availability of the Authority's FOIA Public Liaison to offer assistance. The Solicitor or the IG, as appropriate, will provide the record in the form or format requested if the record is readily reproducible in that form or format, provided the requester has agreed to pay and/or has paid any fees required by § 2411.13 of this part. The Solicitor or the IG, as appropriate, will determine on a case-by-case basis what constitutes a readily reproducible format. These offices will make a reasonable effort to maintain their records in commonly reproducible forms or formats.
( b ) Alternatively, the Solicitor or the IG, as appropriate, may make a copy of the releasable portions of the record available to the requester for inspection at a reasonable time and place. The procedure for such an inspection will not unreasonably disrupt the operations of the office.
[88 FR 67060, Sept. 29, 2023]
§ 3201.108 Related statutory and regulatory authorities. ( a ) 18 U.S.C. 213, which prohibits an examiner from accepting a loan or gratuity from an FDIC-insured depository institution examined by him or her or from any person connected with such institution.
( b ) 18 U.S.C. 1906, which prohibits disclosure of information from a bank examination report except as authorized by law.
( c ) 17 CFR 240.10b-5 which prohibits the use of manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.
( d ) 18 U.S.C. 1909, which prohibits examiners from providing any service for compensation for any bank or person connected therewith.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-157 December 9, 2004

NRC APPROVES EVALUATION METHOD FOR ANALYZING

REACTOR CONTAINMENT SUMP PERFORMANCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has approved an evaluation method for all operators

of pressurized-water reactors (PWR) to use in analyzing containment sumps, part of a safety-related

water recirculation system in nuclear power plants.

 Operating experience at boiling water reactors (the other type of commercial U.S. nuclear

power plant), as well as recent research, has indicated debris from certain pipe-break accidents inside a

containment building could potentially block PWR sumps beyond what the original design could

accommodate. NRC staff have concluded this issue is not an immediate safety concern, but the

potential for greater sump blockage warrants plant-specific analyses to determine what actions, if any,

are needed.

“Individual plants can now use this analysis method to definitively determine how their sumps

would perform under accident conditions,” said Suzanne Black, Director of the Division of Systems

Safety and Analysis in the NRC’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. “The plants will use the

results to identify any modifications needed to ensure their core-cooling systems operate properly.”

The NRC asked for the evaluations Sept. 14 through a Generic Letter, one of several methods

the NRC has for communicating with the nuclear industry. PWR operators now have until March 7,

2005, to:

-- Describe the method to be used in evaluating the long-term core-cooling systems, as well as 

 the anticipated completion date for the evaluation, and;

-- Describe how the interior of each PWR containment building will be examined during the 

evaluation, as well as the anticipated completion date for the examination, or justify why no 

such examination is needed;

By Sept. 1, 2005, PWR operators must:

-- Confirm that the Emergency Core Cooling System and Containment Spray System comply 

with NRC regulations, or will do so, including a description of the plant’s configuration once 

all modifications are finished, and;

-- Provide a schedule for all corrective actions to be taken, starting no later than April 1, 2006, 

and finishing by Dec. 31, 2007.
-2-

The evaluation methodology is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/pwr-sump-performance.html . The Web page

also outlines NRC staff activities on the PWR containment sump issue. Help in obtaining NRC

documents is available from the NRC’s Public Document Room at 800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737. 

###
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

THE JAZZ CLUB 2, LLC, and GEORGE 

BRIKHO,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

UNPUBLISHED

January 9, 2020

v No. 343872

Wayne Circuit Court

DETROIT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, LC No. 17-015208-AA

Defendant-Appellee.

Before: JANSEN, P.J., and BOONSTRA and LETICA, JJ.

JANSEN, P.J. (concurring). 

I wholly concur with the majority’s opinion in this matter. The trial court erroneously 

upheld the City of Detroit Board of Zoning Appeals’ (BZA’s) determination that plaintiffs, the 

Jazz Club 2, LLC (the Jazz Club) and George Brikho, are ineligible for a medical marijuana 

caregiver business license. 

I write separately only to stress that the trial court read into the definition of an outdoor 

recreation facility a term that does not belong: greenway. As the majority correctly stated, 

Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61-16-144 defines an “outdoor recreation facility” as: 

The use of land for the purpose of a golf course; skating rink (ice skating, roller 

skating, roller blading, skate boarding, and similar activities)[;] park[;] playfield[;] 

playground[;] parklot[;] parkway[;] playlot[;] swimming pool; and/or tennis court. 

Under Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61-3-355, drug-free zone is any area within a 1,000 radial feet

of an outdoor recreation facility, as defined by Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61-16-144, and as 

“identified in the City of Detroit 2017 Recreation Master Plan.” Detroit Zoning Ordinance § 61-

3-353(4). No where in the definition of an “outdoor recreation facility” found in Detroit Zoning 

Ordinance § 61-16-144 does the word “greenway” appear; likewise, a greenway is not identified 

in the City of Detroit’s 2017 Parks and Recreation Improvement Plan (the Master Plan) as a 

recreation facility. Thus, it logically follows that a greenway does not qualify as a drug-free 

zone, and this should end the inquiry. 
-2-

However, the trial court concluded that the BZA properly relied on the Master Plan to 

determine that Rouge Valley Parkway is a greenway, and part of an active park system. But 

what the trial court failed to appreciate is that the Master Plan actually designates “parks” and 

“greenways” as separate spaces, and moreover the Master Plan purposefully does not address 

“greenways, trails, and recreation centers maintained by other agencies, organizations, and 

business[es.]” Finally, the Master Plan, which identifies several, if not all, of the currentlyexisting parks in the City of Detroit, does not designate Rouge Valley Parkway as a park, an 

active park system, or a recreation facility. 

In my view, the foregoing, on its own, should have precluded the trial court from 

affirming the BZA’s determination that plaintiffs are ineligible to possess a medical marijuana 

caregiver business license, as they are not located in a drug-free zone. 

/s/ Kathleen Jansen