alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-118 September 22, 2004

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING SEPT. 30 TO DISCUSS

CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2005 EMPHASIS AREAS

Staff from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

will meet with interested stakeholders on Sept. 30 in Rockville, Md., to discuss how NRR plans to

schedule some of its workload in fiscal year 2005.

The meeting will be held in the Randolph Congressional Room of the Ramada Inn, 1775

Rockville Pike, from 8:30 a.m. until 11:30 a.m. The discussions will help inform stakeholders as to

how resource allocation, scheduling and unanticipated safety efforts can affect three major program

areas: 1) rulemaking and policy development, 2) advanced reactors, and 3) license renewal.

Given the level of stakeholder interactions in these areas, a change in stakeholder schedules or

any unanticipated complexity often affects all three areas. Public comments will assist NRR staff in

considering stakeholder assumptions and priorities as they affect any future workload adjustment.

Members of the public are invited to participate by discussing these issues with NRC staff at

designated points during the meeting. The meeting agenda is available electronically through the

NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , by entering accession number ML042510453 .

For more information on the meeting, contact Timothy Reed at 301-415-1462 or via email at

tjr@nrc.gov .

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This Schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
     September 30, 1996 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
     to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996    JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                          10,456         10,456
<SECURITIES>                    0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                   17,887         17,887
<ALLOWANCES>                    332            332
<INVENTORY>                     0              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                31,842         31,842
<PP&E>                          20,989         20,989
<DEPRECIATION>                  6,135          6,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  188,610        188,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           19,290         19,290
<BONDS>                         0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0              0
<PREFERRED>                     0              0
<COMMON>                        191            191
<OTHER-SE>                      73,664         73,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    188,610        188,610
<SALES>                         0              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                24,300         50,219
<CGS>                           0              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   7,803          16,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,286          5,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                150            150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,922          4,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 4,808          6,946
<INCOME-TAX>                    791            1,376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             4,017          5,570
<DISCONTINUED>                  0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0              0
<CHANGES>                       0              0
<NET-INCOME>                    4,017          5,570
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.21           0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.21           0.31
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.46





                            PROVO INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                       ONE BLUE HILL PLAZA, P.O. BOX 1548
                           PEARL RIVER, NEW YORK 10965



Clive Dakin
Scarborough Ltd.
c/o Euroba Management Limited
73 Front Street, 4th Floor
Hamilton HM 12 Bermuda
                                                               January 23, 2004

         RE:      AMENDMENT OF WARRANTS

Dear Mr. Dakin:

         Reference is made to that certain Subscription Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated November 25, 2003, among Provo International, Inc. f/k/a
Frontline Communications Corporation (the "Company") and the Scarborough Ltd
("Scarborough"), pursuant to which the Company issued to Scarborough in a
private placement (the "Placement"): (i) 1,666,666 shares of the Company's
common stock, $.01 par value ("Common Stock"), (ii) one (1) three-year warrant
(the "A Warrant") to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an
exercise price equal to $.01 per share, and (iii) one (1) forty-five (45) day
warrant (subject to extension as provided therein) (the "B Warrant") to purchase
1,666,666 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price equal to
$.30 per share plus, upon exercise of the B Warrant, one (1) three-year warrant
(the "B2 Warrant") to purchase 1,250,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at
an exercise price equal to $.01 per share (collectively, the A, B and B2
Warrants, the "Warrants").

         The original A and B2 Warrants shall be replaced with amended A and B2
Warrants to revise language regarding adjustment for a stock split and to issue
the B2 Warrant as of the date hereof, in the forms attached as Exhibits A and
B2. The B Warrant has been amended to extend the exercise date to February 15,
2004, and to clarify that upon exercise of all or any portion of the B Warrant,
the B2 Warrant must be issued, in the form attached as Exhibit B. In addition,
in accordance with section 4.2 of the Agreement, we acknowledge that the thirty
(30) calendar day automatic registration period for the B2 Warrants begins with
the date hereof.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        PROVO INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Stephen J. Cole-Hatchard
                                        Name: Stephen J. Cole-Hatchard
                                        Title: CEO

Agreed and accepted:

SCARBOROUGH LTD.

By: /s/ Clive Dakin
Name: Clive Dakin
Title:
### §3545. Civil action to recover money

The Attorney General shall bring a civil action to recover an amount due to the United States Government on settlement of the account of a person accountable for public money when the person neglects or refuses to pay the amount to the Treasury. Any commission of that person and interest of 6 percent a year from the time the money is received by the person until repaid to the Treasury shall be added to the amount due on the account. The commission is forfeited when judgment is obtained.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 969.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3545 | 31:505. | R.S. §3624. |

The functions of the First Comptroller of the Treasury, referred to in Revised Statutes section 3624, were as a matter of law vested in the Solicitor of the Treasury by Revised Statutes sections 377 and 379 (based on the Act of May 28, 1830, ch. 153, 45 Stat. 414). This function is now vested in the Attorney General. See 28:507 as enacted in 1948 and revision notes thereto and existing 28:519, 547, and 509. The words "bring a civil action" are substituted for "institute suit" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code. The word "amount" is substituted for "sum or balance" to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "reported to be" are omitted as surplus. The word "settlement" is substituted for "adjustment" for consistency. The words "by the person" are added for clarity. The words "stated to be", "in every instance where suit is commenced and . . . thereon", and "it shall be" are omitted as surplus.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-8064

No. IV-02-038 August 12, 2002

CONTACT: Roger Hannah E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC INSPECTION TEAM TO DISCUSS RESULTS OF RECENT

INSPECTION AT COOPER NUCLEAR STATION AUGUST 22

A team of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspectors, who recently completed a threeweek, supplemental inspection of the Cooper Nuclear Station, will discuss the results of that inspection

at a public meeting in Peru, Nebraska, on Thursday, August 22. The Cooper Station is located near

Brownville, Nebraska, and is operated by Nebraska Public Power District. 

The meeting will begin at 7:00 p.m. (CDT) in the Theater at Peru State College, 600 Hoyt

Street, in Peru. After discussing the inspection results, NRC inspectors will be available before the end

of the meeting to answer any questions. 

A supplemental inspection is one that is added to the NRC’s normal, or baseline, inspection

program in response to declining regulatory performance. The supplemental inspection at the Cooper

plant is the most extensive called for under NRC’s inspection program. The inspection was performed

by a 13-member team led by Kriss Kennedy, chief of the branch that oversees Cooper in the NRC

Region IV office in Arlington, Texas. 

Declining performance at Cooper led to the inspection, but the NRC believes the plant

continues to be operated safely. A final report for the Cooper inspection is expected to be issued by

the end of August.

###
#### Tee Ka Chay, Respondent, v. Lamport Company, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

The corporate defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment directing them to account to plaintiff for the disposition, proceeds and fair and reasonable market value of certain merchandise. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present— Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
### §577a. Small-boat navigation projects; charter fishing craft

The Chief of Engineers, for the purpose of determining Federal and non-Federal cost sharing, relating to proposed construction of small-boat navigation projects, shall consider charter fishing craft as commercial vessels.

(Pub. L. 91–611, title I, §119, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1822.)
### §734. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section, R.S. §4678, related to coloring and numbering buoys.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
II 

Calendar No. 334

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1610

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2003

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, 

Missouri, as the ‘‘Walt Disney Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WALT DISNEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

5 States Postal Service located at 120 East Ritchie Avenue 

6 in Marceline, Missouri, and known as the Marceline Main 

7 Office, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Walt Disney 

8 Post Office Building’’. 
2

•HR 1610 RS 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Walt Disney Post Of5 fice Building. 

Calendar No. 334

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1610

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States 

Postal Service located at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, as the ‘‘Walt Disney Post Office Building’’. 

OCTOBER 27, 2003

Reported without amendment
### §535f. Applicability of provisions

This subchapter shall apply to all international bridges constructed under the authority of this subchapter. Section 535a of this title and section 129(a)(3) of title 23, shall apply to all international bridges the construction of which has been heretofore approved by Congress, notwithstanding any conflicting provision in any Act authorizing the construction of such a bridge or in any agreement entered into by the Federal Government and a State.

(Pub. L. 92–434, §9, Sept. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 733.)
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan W.Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   | ** ** |
|---------------------------|------------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| February 8, 2008          |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 30, 2002 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20054 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM ERNESTO PEREZ-BOLLANO, also known as William Bollano-Perez, also known as William Perez, also known as William Ernesto Perez, also known as William Ernesto Bolan Perez, also known as William Perez-Bollanos, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-113-1

- - - - - - - - - - Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Willam Ernesto Perez-Bollano (Perez) appeals his conviction after a bench trial of illegal re-entry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). He raises three issues on appeal: (1) that the district court erred by delegating authority to the United States Probation Office to determine his ability to pay the costs of theNo. 02-20054 -2- court-ordered drug and alcohol treatment program; (2) that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional because it does not require a prior aggravated felony offense to be proven to the factfinder beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) that the evidence of his prior deportation should have been suppressed because the removal procedures violated due process. Perez concedes that the latter two arguments are foreclosed by this court’s precedent but raises these issues in order to preserve possible Supreme Court review. Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000) , did not overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998)
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). Accordingly, Perez’s argument that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional lacks merit.
In United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte , 186 F.3d 651, 656- 59 (5th Cir. 1999), this court held that the administrative removal procedures in 8 U.S.C. § 1228 do not violate due process and that in order to collaterally attack a prior deportation proceeding in a prosecution under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 a defendant is required to establish that there is a reasonable likelihood that he would not have been deported but for the alleged errors in the deportation proceeding. Perez has conceded that he cannot meet this standard. Therefore, this issue is foreclosed.No. 02-20054 -3-
In United States v. Warden , 291 F.3d 363 (5th Cir. 2002), we recently rejected an appellant’s assertion that allowing a probation officer to determine the appellant’s ability to pay the costs of court-ordered treatment programs was an impermissible delegation of authority. Thus, Perez’s first argument also is foreclosed by circuit precedent. Id. at 366.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
  ****Date: February
      11, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David
SalzmanDavid SalzmanChief Executive Officer of Richman
      AmericanCredit Corp., Manager of the
Registrant
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
6F506A2249E4F68B709A37EF3AE895F1 *faq_boll_weevil_07.pdf
Exhibit 23.0 Consent of the Companys Independent Auditors     
   Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants  The Board of Directors EFC Bancorp, Inc.:  We
consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-68743) of EFC Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 2002,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of sEFC Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of EFC Bancorp,
Inc.  /s/ KPMG LLPChicago, IllinoisMarch 21, 2002
### **CHAPTER 34—INLAND NAVIGATIONAL RULES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—RULES

2001 to 2038. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

2071.
Inland navigation rules.
2072.
Violations of Inland Navigational Rules.
2073.
Repealed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 23, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 23, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0126. ANTHONY ALLEN OLIVER v. CRYSTAL FIELD.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SU19DR493
### §426–1. Coastal Engineering Research Center; establishment; powers and functions

There shall be established under the Chief of Engineers, United States Army, a Coastal Engineering Research Center which, except as hereinafter provided in section 426–3 of this title, shall be vested with all the functions of the Beach Erosion Board, including the authority to make general investigations as provided in section 426a of this title, and such additional functions as the Chief of Engineers may assign.

(Pub. L. 88–172, §1, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 304.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of section 1 of Pub. L. 88–172. The remainder of said section 1, abolishing the Beach Erosion Board, is classified as a note under section 426 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Beach Erosion Board

Section 1 of Pub. L. 88–172 abolished Beach Erosion Board, and is set out as a note under section 426 of this title. For the transfer of certain functions of said Board to Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, see section 426–3 of this title. For termination of Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 180 days after Oct. 31, 1992, and reassignment of duties and responsibilities by Secretary of Army, see section 223 of Pub. L. 102–580, set out as a note under section 541 of this title.
§ 1205.31 Submitting appeal. ( a ) A partial or complete denial, by the Clerk of the Board, by the Regional Director, or by the Chief Administrative Judge, of a request for amendment may be appealed to the Chairman, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20419-0001 within 10 workdays from the date of the denial.
( b ) Any appeal must be in writing, must be clearly and conspicuously identified as a Privacy Act appeal on both the envelope and letter, and must include: ( 1 ) A copy of the original request for amendment of the record;
( 2 ) A copy of the denial; and
( 3 ) A statement of the reasons why the original denial should be overruled.
[64 FR 51043, Sept. 21, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 48886, Aug. 10, 2000]
### §186. Reservation of easements or rights-of-way for working purposes; reservation of right to dispose of surface of lands; determination before offering of lease; easement periods

Any permit, lease, occupation, or use permitted under this chapter shall reserve to the Secretary of the Interior the right to permit upon such terms as he may determine to be just, for joint or several use, such easements or rights-of-way, including easements in tunnels upon, through, or in the lands leased, occupied, or used as may be necessary or appropriate to the working of the same, or of other lands containing the deposits described in this chapter, and the treatment and shipment of the products thereof by or under authority of the Government, its lessees, or permittees, and for other public purposes. The Secretary of the Interior, in his discretion, in making any lease under this chapter, may reserve to the United States the right to lease, sell, or otherwise dispose of the surface of the lands embraced within such lease under existing law or laws hereafter enacted, insofar as said surface is not necessary for use of the lessee in extracting and removing the deposits therein. If such reservation is made it shall be so determined before the offering of such lease. The said Secretary, during the life of the lease, is authorized to issue such permits for easements herein provided to be reserved.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §29, 41 Stat. 449.)