alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2422.30 When does a Regional Director investigate a petition, issue notices of hearings, take actions, and issue Decisions and Orders? ( a ) *Regional Director investigation.* The Regional Director will investigate the petition and any other matter as the Regional Director deems necessary.
( b ) *Regional Director notice of hearing.* The Regional Director will issue a notice of hearing to inquire into any matter about which a material issue of fact exists, and any time there is reasonable cause to believe a question exists regarding unit appropriateness.
( c ) *Regional Director action.* After investigation or hearing, the Regional Director can direct an election, or approve an election agreement, or issue a Decision and Order.
( d ) *Appeal of Regional Director Decision and Order.* A party may file with the Authority an application for review of a Regional Director Decision and Order.
( e ) *Contents of the Record.* When there has not been a hearing all material submitted to and considered by the Regional Director during the investigation becomes a part of the record. When a hearing has been held, the transcript and all material entered into evidence, including any posthearing briefs, become a part of the record.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region IV

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-017 April 7, 2003 

CONTACT: Victor Dricks E-mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

 

 NRC TO MEET WITH PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO. TO DISCUSS

 PERFORMANCE OF DIABLO CANYON 

 

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Pacific Gas & Electric

Co. on Monday, April 14, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of safety

performance at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. The facility, which includes two operating

reactors, is located near San Luis Obispo, Calif., and is operated by PG&E. 

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 6:30

p.m. at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 333 Madonna Road, San Luis Obispo, CA.

Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant

operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC

staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region IV Office to representatives of PG&E addresses the

performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is

available on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/diab_2002q4.pdf

"Overall, Diablo Canyon operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully

met all cornerstone objectives," the letter says, noting that NRC staff plans to conduct only baseline

inspections during 2003.

In addition, the letter notes: "As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks on September 11,

2001, the NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and

improve guard force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of

these requirements and have monitored your actions in response to changing threat conditions. For

calendar year 2003, we plan to continue these inspections and conduct portions of the security baseline
inspection program, as well as perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new

requirements that may be ordered."

Current performance information for Diablo Canyon Unit 1 is available on the NRC web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DIAB1/diab1_chart.html

Current performance information for Unit 2 is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DIAB2/diab2_chart.html

###
§ 337.102 Evaluating qualifications for employees who are in a retained grade. ( a ) Employees who are in a retained grade must have the experience they gain subsequent to the downgrading action that placed them in a retained grade considered in the following manner. For placements during the period the employee is in a retained grade, agencies must consider the experience subsequent to the downgrading action to be either: ( 1 ) At the level of the retained grade and in the series of the position which he or she occupied at the time of the downgrading; or
( 2 ) At the grade and in the series of the position to which the employee is downgraded.
( b ) Agencies must determine which experience to consider on the basis of which will most likely result in placement. For placements or promotions after the retained grade period, the experience is considered only at the grade level and in the series of the position to which the employee was downgraded.
[45 FR 18365, Mar. 21, 1980]
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Argo-Tech Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended October 26, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

Date: January 24, 2003

                                           By: /s/ Michael S. Lipscomb
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   Michael S. Lipscomb
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                           By: /s/ Frances S. St. Clair
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   Frances S. St. Clair
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
### §294. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(b), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, as added Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 595, §3, 49 Stat. 669, related to orders to helmsmen.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Mar. 1, 1983, pursuant to 47 F.R. 15135, Apr. 8, 1982, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
### §541f. Disbursement of moneys

All moneys received under the provisions of this chapter shall be paid into the Treasury of the United States and distributed in the same manner as provided in section 191 of this title and sections 437, 438, and 439 1 of title 48.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 795, §7, 69 Stat. 681.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 437, 438, and 439 of title 48, referred to in text, were repealed by Pub. L. 86–252, §1, Sept. 9, 1959, 73 Stat. 490.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 2472.7 Investigation of request; Panel assistance. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request for consideration of an impasse filed in accordance with these rules, the Panel or its designee shall promptly conduct an investigation, consulting when necessary with the parties. After due consideration, the Panel shall determine the procedures by which the impasse shall be resolved and shall notify the parties of its determination.
( b ) The procedures utilized by the Panel shall afford the parties an opportunity to present their positions, including supporting evidence and arguments orally and/or in writing. They include, but are not limited to: informal conferences with a Panel designee; factfinding (by a Panel designee or a private factfinder); written submissions; show cause orders; and oral presentations to the Panel.
[48 FR 19695, May 2, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 41295, 41296, Aug. 8, 1996]
§ 293.311 Availability of information. ( a ) The following information from both the OPF and employee performance file system folders, their automated equivalent records, and from other personnel record files that constitute an agency record within the meaning of the FOIA and which are under the control of the Office, about most present and former Federal employees, is available to the public: ( 1 ) Name;
( 2 ) Present and past position titles and occupational series;
( 3 ) Present and past grades;
( 4 ) Present and past annual salary rates (including performance awards or bonuses, incentive awards, merit pay amount, Meritorious or Distinguished Executive Ranks, and allowances and differentials);
( 5 ) Present and past duty stations (includes room numbers, shop designations, or other identifying information regarding buildings or places of employment); and
( 6 ) Position descriptions, identification of job elements, and those performance standards (but not actual performance appraisals) that the release of which would not interfere with law enforcement programs or severely inhibit agency effectiveness. Performance elements and standards (or work expectations) may be withheld when they are so interwined with performance appraisals that their disclosure would reveal an individual's performance appraisal.
( b ) The Office or agency will generally not disclose information where the data sought is a list of names, present or past position titles, grades, salaries, performance standards, and/or duty stations of Federal employees which, as determined by the official responsible for custody of the information: ( 1 ) Is selected in such a way that would reveal more about the employee on whom information is sought than the six enumerated items, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; or
( 2 ) Would otherwise be protected from mandatory disclosure under an exemption of the FOIA.
( c ) In addition to the information described in paragraph (a) of this section, a Government official may provide other information from these records (or automated equivalents) of an employee, to others outside of the agency, under a summons, warrant, subpoena, or other legal process; as provided by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(4) through (b)(11)), under those Privacy Act routine uses promulgated by the Office, and as required by the FOIA.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEWIS P. WILLIAMS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3710

[ February 15, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97

- 15927CF10A

.

Lewis P. Williams, Clermont, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Form
10-K) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the Company), I, Joe A. Shearin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-K.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  |  |  |                     |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Joe A. Shearin      |  |  |  | Date: March 5, 2010
|    |  | Joe A. Shearin          |  |  |  |                     |  | 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  |                     |  |
DESCRIPTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REGISTRANT AND JOSEPH FRISCIA



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 DESCRIPTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REGISTRANT AND JOSEPH FRISCIA 
 ENTERED INTO IN JANUARY 2004 
  
 Joseph J. Friscia resigned as Executive Vice President of Sales and Service in January 2004. At the time of his resignation, Mr. Friscia entered into an oral agreement
with Pegasystems pursuant to which he agreed to provide sales consulting services to the company through March 31, 2004 in exchange for variable compensation capped at $100,000. The actual amount of Mr. Friscia’s compensation under the
agreement is based on Pegasystems’ revenue in the first quarter of 2004.
NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                       Office of Public Affairs              Telephone: 301/415-8200

                              Washington, D.C. 20555-0001       E-mail: opa@nrc.gov  Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 06-142                                                                                                                 November 8, 2006

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION HONORS EDWARD MCGAFFIGAN FOR LEADERSHIP AND LONGEST TENURE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission honored Commissioner Edward McGaffigan today at itsRockville, Md., headquarters in a ceremony recognizing his exemplary public service, leadership andtenure as the longest serving Commissioner in the agency’s history. McGaffigan was first appointed tohis position on August 28, 1996, and has been reappointed for an unprecedented two additional five-year terms.

Chairman Dale Klein presented the Distinguished Service Award before a crowd of NRCcolleagues, staff and invited guests. Commisioners Merrifield, Lyons and Jaczko also madepresentations, and several Congressional leaders sent their congratulations.

Among other accolades, Klein cited McGaffigan for working “tirelessly” to protect theindependence of the NRC, help establish an effective license renewal process, inaugurate the improvedReactor Oversight Process and increase security at nuclear facilities. 

Prior to his first appointment to the agency, McGaffigan served as a legislative assistant, thenlegislative director, and finally senior policy advisor to Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM).  He hadpreviously served as a member of the Foreign Service and as a senior policy analyst and then assistantdirector in the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Earlier in his career,McGaffigan worked on Japanese science and technology at the RAND Corporation, and on strategicarms control issues at the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. His complete biography is found at: http://www.nrc.gov/who-we-are/organization/commission/mcgaffigan.html . 

“Commissioner McGaffigan’s leadership and contributions to protecting public health, safetyand the environment are recognized throughout government,” Klein said. “His contributions to themission of the NRC reflects the highest ideals of public service.”

# # # 

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html .  The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Forty Wall Street Building, Inc., et al., Appellants, against Joseph Lilly et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. (Premises 40 Wall Street, New York City. Section 1, Block 43, Lot 2. Taxes for 1940-1941 and 1941-1942.)

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glen-non, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
### §888. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §§264, 4690; acts Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §§4, 10, 32 Stat. 826, 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 929, relating to an annual statement on coast surveys by the Coast and Geodetic Survey [now the National Ocean Survey], was partially repealed by acts May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(104), 45 Stat. 994; Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 770, §1(5), 60 Stat. 866; and Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1076, §1(13), 68 Stat. 967.
### §49e. Annual labor or improvements on Alaskan mining claims; affidavits; burden of proof; forfeitures; location anew of claims; perjury

During each year and until patent has been issued therefor, at least $100 worth of labor shall be performed or improvements made on, or for the benefit or development of, in accordance with existing law, each mining claim in Alaska heretofore or hereafter located. And the locator or owner of such claim or some other person having knowledge of the facts may also make and file with the said recorder of the district in which the claims shall be situated an affidavit showing the performance of labor or making of improvements to the amount of $100 as aforesaid and specifying the character and extent of such work. Such affidavits shall set forth the following: First, the name or number of the mining claims and where situated; second, the number of days' work done and the character and value of the improvements placed thereon; third, the date of the performance of such labor and of making improvements; fourth, at whose instance the work was done or the improvements made; fifth, the actual amount paid for work and improvement, and by whom paid when the same was not done by the owner. Such affidavit shall be prima facie evidence of the performance of such work or making of such improvements, but if such affidavits be not filed within the time fixed by this section the burden of proof shall be upon the claimant to establish the performance of such annual work and improvements. And upon failure of the locator or owner of any such claim to comply with the provisions of this section, as to performance of work and improvements, such claim shall become forfeited and open to location by others as if no location of the same had ever been made. The affidavits required may be made before any officer authorized to administer oaths, and the provisions of sections 1621 and 1622 of title 18, are extended to such affidavits. Said affidavits shall be filed not later than ninety days after the close of the year in which such work is performed.

(Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2559, §1, 34 Stat. 1243.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Sections 1621 and 1622 of title 18" substituted in text for "sections fifty-three hundred and ninety-two and fifty-three hundred ninety-three of the Revised Statutes", which had been classified to section 231 and 232 of former Title 18, Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure, on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 683, the first section of which enacted Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section was formerly classified to section 384 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
§ 207.110 Subpoenas. ( a ) *Application for issuance of a subpoena.* Except as provided in § 207.109(c) of this subpart, an application for issuance of a subpoena requiring a person to appear and depose or testify at the taking of a deposition or at a hearing shall be made to the administrative law judge. The application shall be made in writing, and shall specify the material to be produced as precisely as possible, showing the relevancy of the material and the reasonableness of the scope of the subpoena. The application shall be ruled upon by the administrative law judge.
( b ) *Enforcement of a subpoena.* A motion for enforcement of a subpoena shall be made to the administrative law judge. Upon consideration of the motion and any response thereto, the administrative law judge shall recommend to the Commission in favor of or against enforcement. The administrative law judge's recommendation shall provide the basis therefor, and shall address each of the criteria necessary for enforcement of an administrative subpoena. After consideration of the administrative law judge's recommendation, the Commission shall determine whether initiation of enforcement proceedings is appropriate.
( c ) *Application for subpoena grounded upon the Freedom of Information Act.* No application for a subpoena for production of documents grounded upon the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) shall be entertained by the administrative law judge or the Commission.
§ 2638.403 Formal action. If the Director determines that informal action, pursuant to § 2638.402, has not produced an acceptable resolution, the Director may issue an order directing the agency to take specific corrective action. ( a ) Before issuing such an order, the Director will: ( 1 ) Advise the agency in writing of the deficiency in its ethics program;
( 2 ) Describe the action that the Director is considering taking;
( 3 ) Provide the agency with 30 days to respond in writing; and
( 4 ) Consider any timely written response submitted by the agency.
( b ) If the Director is satisfied with the agency's response, no order will be issued.
( c ) If the Director decides to issue an order, the order will describe the corrective action to be taken.
( d ) If the agency does not comply with the order within a reasonable time, the Director will: ( 1 ) Notify the head of the agency of intent to furnish a report of noncompliance to the President and the Congress;
( 2 ) Provide the agency 14 calendar days within which to furnish written comments for submission with the report of noncompliance; and
( 3 ) Report the agency's noncompliance to the President and to the Congress.