alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.522 Green light and green box subsidies. ( a ) *Certain agricultural subsidies.* The Secretary will treat as non-countervailable domestic support measures that are provided to certain agricultural products (*i.e.,* products listed in Annex 1 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture) and that the Secretary determines conform to the criteria of Annex 2 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. *See* section 771(5B)(F) of the Act. The Secretary will determine that a particular domestic support measure conforms fully to the provisions of Annex 2 if the Secretary finds that the measure: ( 1 ) Is provided through a publicly-funded government program (including government revenue foregone) not involving transfers from consumers;
( 2 ) Does not have the effect of providing a price support to producers; and
( 3 ) Meets the relevant policy-specific criteria and conditions set out in paragraphs 2 through 13 of Annex 2.
( b ) *Research subsidies.* In accordance with section 771(5B)(B)(iii)(II) of the Act, the Secretary will examine the total eligible costs to be incurred over the duration of a particular project to determine whether a subsidy for research activities exceeds 75 percent of the costs of industrial research, 50 percent of the costs of precompetitive development activity, or 62.5 percent of the costs for a project that includes both industrial research and precompetitive activity. If the Secretary determines that, at some point over the life of a particular project, these relevant thresholds will be exceeded, the Secretary will treat the entire amount of the subsidy as countervailable.
( c ) *Subsidies for adaptation of existing facilities to new environmental requirements.* If the Secretary determines that a subsidy is given to upgrade existing facilities to environmental standards in excess of minimum statutory or regulatory requirements, the subsidy will not qualify for non-countervailable treatment under section 771(5B)(D) of the Act and the Secretary will treat the entire amount of the subsidy as countervailable.
EXHIBIT 23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-126897) pertaining to the Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and Dr. AlanJoslyn Plan, in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 No. 333-98801 and No. 333-66741) pertainingto the Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-66747) pertaining to the Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-66739) pertaining to the Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co.Savings Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-66733) pertaining to the PenwestPharmaceuticals Co. 1998 Spinoff Option Plan, in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 No.333-108513, No. 333-121332, and No. 333-126904) of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co. and in the relatedProspectuses of our reports dated March 13, 2007, with respect to the financial statements andschedule of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co., Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co.’s management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Penwest Pharmaceuticals Co., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPStamford, Connecticut
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0117- Termination of Request for Hertiage Minerals, Inc. Site In Manchester Township, New Jersey

Accession Number: ML060800027

Date Released: Monday, June 26, 2006

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML060750104 - SECY-06-0117 - Termination of NRC License for the Heritage Minerals Inc. Site in Manchester Township, NJ (7 page(s), 5/18/2006)
    - ML060060003 - Final Dose Assessment for Unrestricted Future Use Scenarios of the Heritage Minerals, Inc. (HMI) Site. (15 page(s), 12/23/2005)
    - ML060790134 - SECY-06-0117-Enclosure 2 - Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Termination of USNRC Materials License No. SMB-1541, Issued to Heritage Minerals, Inc. in Manchester Township, NJ, and Release for Unrestricted Use (11 page(s), 5/11/2006)
    - ML060790136 - SECY-06-0117-Enclosure 3 - Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment for Heritage Minerals, Inc., Manchester Township, New Jersey (78 page(s), 5/18/2006)
    - ML060790141 - SECY-06-0117Enclosure 4 - Heritage Minerals, Inc. (HMI), License Termination and Exercise of Enforcement Discretion, control No. 136715 (2 page(s), 5/18/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-042 October 14, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC PROPOSES $3,000 FINE

AGAINST INTEGRATED PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $3,000 fine against Integrated

Production Services, Inc., of Broussard, La., for a willful violation of NRC radiation safety

requirements.

The company is licensed by the State of Louisiana to use well-logging devices with

sealed radioactive material to obtain information about underground rock formations and the

likely amounts of gas and oil present. However, in May 2001, the NRC notified the State of

Louisiana’s licensees that they were be subject to NRC regulatory requirements when operating

in offshore waters.

During an NRC inspection and investigation completed on August 9, 2004, the NRC staff

determined that the company had conducted well-logging activities in offshore waters in

September 2003, and transported radioactive byproduct material into offshore waters on other

occasions without first obtaining an NRC license. 

The NRC also determined that the violation was willful, as the company’s representative

had attended a May 10, 2001, NRC-sponsored meeting in Lafayette, La., where the requirements

were explained.

Although the company maintains that there was no intent to violate federal law, “the NRC

continues to believe that willfulness was associated with this violation,” the NRC’s Region IV

Administrator Bruce S. Mallett said in a letter to the company. “IPS sent a representative to the

(May 10, 2001) meeting and had the overall responsibility to assure that the messages conveyed

by NRC at this meeting were acted upon.” Mallett also noted that the violation occurred after

applying for, but before receiving, an NRC license to operate in offshore waters.
-2-

The company’s corrective actions include employment of a full-time radiation safety

officer, actions to assure that company managers are aware of meetings with regulatory agencies

and any required actions, monthly review of employee training plans, and meetings with

employees to emphasize the importance of compliance.

The company is required to provide a written response to the proposed violation within

30 days.

###
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0195 - Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 50, "Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor"

Accession Number: ML032461323

Date Released: Monday, November 24, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML032460681 - SECY-03-0195 - Final Rule, 10 CFR Part 50, "Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (3 page(s), 11/7/2003)
    - ML032460765 - SECY-03-0195Atch1 - Final Rule on Financial Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (37 page(s), 11/7/2003)
    - ML032460795 - SECY-03-0195Atch2 - Regulatory Analysis - Final Rule - Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (24 page(s), 11/7/2003)
    - ML032460815 - SECY-03-0195Atch3 - Environmental Assessment - Final Rule - Financial Information Requirements for Applications to Renew or Extend the Term of an Operating License for a Power Reactor (3 page(s), 11/7/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### § 179.306 Written agreement for repayment.

A debtor who admits liability but elects not to have the debt collected by administrative offset will be afforded an opportunity to negotiate a written agreement for the repayment of the debt. If the financial condition of the debtor does not support the ability to pay in one lump-sum, reasonable installments may be considered. No installment arrangement will be considered unless the debtor submits a financial statement, executed under penalty of perjury, reflecting the debtor's assets, liabilities, income, and expenses. The financial statement must be submitted within 10 business days of OPM's request for the statement. At OPM's option, a confess-judgment note or bond of indemnity with surety may be required for the installment agreement. Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, any reduction or compromise of a claim will be governed by 4 CFR part 103 and 31 U.S.C. 3711.
As a U.S. citizen and member of the U.S. airline community, I believe that safety, compliance with EU-US 

Open Skies agreements and compliance with “Fly America” provisions are of the utmost importance. It 

is on this basis that I respectfully request the Department of Transportation to conduct a thorough 

review of DOT-OST-2010-0231.

Purely with regards to safety, it is my opinion that the Department of Transportation should deny the 

application submitted by Gestair Cargo. It is not an application for a new service; this is an application 

for the replacement of an existing service across the Northern Atlantic by an operator that has never 

operated the type aircraft requested in the application. Gestair Cargo has not adequately demonstrated 

any level of experience in the busy track system of the North Atlantic and the application leaves the 

question unanswered as to whether the carrier is NATOPS certified.

With regards to the legal requirements, in accordance with the EU-US Open Skies agreement for wetleasing, the applicant must demonstrate that they hold the authority to wet-lease. They also must 

demonstrate that they have met the conditions prescribed in the laws and regulations of the European 

condition. I see no evidence in the application that the carrier meets these requirements.

Additionally, the “Fly America” act requires that transportation of government-financed passengers and 

property be moved on U.S. carriers. The description of cargo referenced in the application is vague 

enough to include “mail”. This alone demonstrates the need to verify the contents that Gestair Cargo 

would actually be carrying. If there is, in fact, any U.S. government product or mail, the application 

should be denied on the basis that there is no “matter of necessity” for a foreign carrier to haul that 

freight, as there is an abundance of U.S. lift from JFK to the EU.

Thank you for your consideration.

David Ross
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-003 January 11, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NEW NRC SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR ASSIGNED 

TO PEACH BOTTOM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Fred Bower has been assigned as the new Nuclear Regulatory Commission Senior Inspector at

the Peach Bottom nuclear power plant. He joins NRC Resident Inspector Dan Schroeder at the twounit site, in Delta, Pa. Bower replaces Craig Smith who has left the agency. 

Bower first joined the NRC in 1990 as a reactor engineer in the Region I office in King of

Prussia, Pa. Most recently, Bower worked as a senior reactor inspector in the Region I Division of

Reactor Safety. In addition to his work as a region-based inspector, he has also been assigned as a

resident inspector at the Salem nuclear plant in Lower Alloway’s Creek, N.J., and at the Calvert Cliffs

plant in Lusby, Md.

Prior to joining the NRC, Bower worked as in progressively more responsible positions

associated with the repair, modification and overhaul of naval ships and submarines at the Norfolk

Naval Shipyard in Portsmouth, Va. 

Bower is a graduate of Virginia Tech, where he earned a bachelor of science degree in

mechanical engineering. He also earned a master’s in engineering management from Old Dominion

University. 

“Fred Bower’s extensive experience and commitment to safety will help the NRC ensure that

Peach Bottom conducts operations with the highest safety standards to protect the public health and

safety,” said NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors. They serve as

the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting inspections, monitoring major work projects and

interacting with plant workers and the public. 

The Peach Bottom resident inspectors can be reached at 717/456-7614.

###
H. R. 1598

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities

Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in projects within

the San Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Irvine Basin Surface and Groundwater Improvement Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (Public Law 102–575, title XVI;

43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1635

the following:

‘‘SEC. 1636. IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.

‘‘(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary, in cooperation with the

Irvine Ranch Water District, California, is authorized to participate

in the design, planning, and construction of projects to naturally

treat impaired surface water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and provide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek

Watershed.

‘‘(b) COST SHARE.—The Federal share of the costs of the projects

authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total

cost.

‘‘(c) LIMITATION.—The Secretary shall not provide funds for

the operation or maintenance of a project authorized by this section.’’.

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections in section

2 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act
H. R. 1598—2

of 1992 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section

1635 the following:

‘‘1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement projects.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-064 April 7, 2005

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 29 ON ISSUES

ASSOCIATED WITH HEMYC FIRE PROTECTION MATERIAL

Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with interested stakeholders on April 29 in

Rockville, Md., to discuss the use of a fire-resistant material marketed under the name “Hemyc.”

The meeting will be held in the Auditorium of the NRC’s Two White Flint North building,

11545 Rockville Pike, from 8:30 a.m. until noon. The discussions will focus on the capability of

Hemyc with respect to nuclear power plant fire protection strategies, given that recent tests have raised

questions about Hemyc’s ability to fully protect electrical cabling as long as required by NRC

regulations.

The agency has contacted those plants using Hemyc to inform them about the test results so that

any appropriate compensatory actions can be taken. Since the material is used in areas with both fire

detection and suppression systems, the NRC remains assured that those plants’ overall fire protection

scheme will ensure safe shutdown of a reactor in case of fire. The NRC will issue letters to the affected

plants to ensure they take appropriate corrective actions.

Members of the public are invited to participate by discussing these issues with NRC staff

throughout the meeting. For more information on the meeting, contact Chandu Patel at 301-415-3025

(via email at cpp@nrc.gov ) or Daniel Frumkin at 301-415-2280 (via email at dxf1@nrc.gov). Parties

interested in participating in the meeting via toll-free teleconference should contact Patel or Frumkin.

###
§ 1651.8 Participant's estate. If the account is to be paid to the duly appointed executor or administrator of the participant's estate under § 1651.2(a)(5), the following rules apply: ( a ) *Appointment by court.* The executor or administrator must provide documentation of court appointment.
( b ) *Appointment by operation of law.* If state law provides procedures for handling small estates, the TSP record keeper will accept the person authorized to dispose of the assets of the deceased participant under those procedures as a duly appointed executor or administrator. Documentation which demonstrates that the person is properly authorized under state law must be submitted to the TSP record keeper.
[62 FR 32429, June 13, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 31686, May 24, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1668 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1668

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 4, 2003

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 North Fifth 
   Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ``Ed Edmondson United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 101 North Fifth Street in 
Muskogee, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the ``Ed Edmondson 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Edmondson 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 3, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 12.98 Importations permitted by statutory exceptions. The importation of switchblade knives is permitted by 15 U.S.C. 1244, when: ( a ) Imported pursuant to contract with a branch of the Armed Forces of the United States;
( b ) Imported by a branch of the Armed Forces of the United States or any member or employee thereof acting in the performance of his duty; or
( c ) A switchblade knife, other than a ballistic knife, having a blade not exceeding 3 inches in length is in the possession of and is being transported on the person of an individual who has only one arm.
[T.D. 71-243, 36 FR 18860, Sept. 23, 1971, as amended by T.D. 90-50, 55 FR 28192, July 10, 1990]
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-09-0198

SAT Date: 2/13/2009

Print Date: 3/7/2013

Related cases: Yes

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 U2

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation, dermal, drinking water

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,MM

LUNG

IMMUNO

ONCO

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-09-0198-99

FATE: 

Solid 

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 EC (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E)

BP > 400 EC (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
POTW removal (%) = U via U

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = U

Sorption to soils/sediments = U

PBT Potential: P3BU

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = U

 Health:

 Health Summary: Expect poor absorption via all routes (analog). Concern 

for irritation to eye, skin, and mucous membranes (including respiratory tract) based on analogs. 

Concern for lung overload for a poorly soluble particulate, and for lung effects, based on 

submitted test data. Possible concern for immunotoxicity and oncogenicity, based on analogs.

 Test Data: Submitted with 

Five-day rat inhalation study NOAEC 0.1 mg/m3, with increased protein concentrations, enzyme 

activity, cytokine and chemokine concentrations, and lymphocyte counts, observed to the end of 

the 28-day recovery period. In the lung, increased cytokine and chemokine concentrations, 

organ weights, and numbers of macrophages, and granulomatous inflammation.

Submitted with 

Pulmonary bioassay screening study in rats (intratracheal instillation): 15% mortality within 12 

hours at 1.5 mg/kg, suffocation at 5 mg/kg, with transient pulmonary inflammatory response 

after 24 hours, and presence of multifocal granulomas.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = ; MW>1,000,000; solid; log 

Kow >> 10 (P); S = negligible; pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and nominal concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs neutral organic compounds

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
1.72265625 Dn Diameter of Nozzle ( Ft. ) 2

13.78125 8* (Dn)2 1.36118889 Dd 2 Diameter of Sampling Duct (Ft) 2 10.12442145 3.903 Roof vent velocity (ft/sec) from Anemometer Data **39.51561693** Desired Velocity in the Duct (ft/sec) 4-30-13 Line 3