alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §550. Report on water terminal and transfer facilities

The Chief of Engineers, United States Army, shall indicate in his annual reports the character of the terminal and transfer facilities existing on every harbor or waterway under maintenance or improvement by the United States, and state whether they are considered adequate for existing commerce. He shall also submit one or more special reports on this subject, as soon as possible after January 18, 1918, including, among other things, the following:

(a) A brief description of such water terminals, including location and the suitability of such terminals to the existing traffic conditions, and whether such terminals are publicly or privately owned, and the terms and conditions under which they may be subjected to public use.

(b) Whether such water terminals are connected by a belt or spur line of railroad with all the railroads serving the same territory or municipality, and whether such connecting railroad is owned by the public and the conditions upon which the same may be used, and also whether there is an interchange of traffic between the water carriers and the railroad or railroads as to such traffic which is carried partly by rail and partly by water to its destination, and also whether improved and adequate highways have been constructed connecting such water terminal with the other lines of highways.

(c) If no water terminals have been constructed by the municipality or other existing public agency there shall be included in his report an expression of opinion in general terms as to the necessity, number, and appropriate location of such a terminal or terminals.

(d) An investigation of the general subject of water terminals, with descriptions and general plans of terminals of appropriate types and construction for the harbors and waterways of the United States suitable for various commercial purposes and adapted to the varying conditions of tides, floods, and other physical characteristics.

(July 18, 1918, ch. 155, §7, 40 Stat. 911.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from act July 18, 1918, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1918".
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2018

a0927 

# Order

Clerk September 28, 2018

157196

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 157196

COA: 332900

St. Clair CC: 15

- 002302

- FC

ELIZABETH LONG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Hillsborough,

June, 1897.

#### Munroe *v.*St. Germain.

A failure to enter a writ in court dissolves an attachment made thereunder. An officer who has attached a stock of goods and paid the proceeds of a sale thereof to the attaching creditor cannot justify his action, after a dissolution of the attachment, upon the ground that the sale of the property in question by the debtor to the party claiming title thereto was fraudulent as to the attaching creditor for want of a sufficient change of possession.

Trover, for a stock of goods. Facts found by a referee. August 15, 1895, Cavanaugh & O’Leary sold and delivered the stock of goods to the plaintiff in settlement of their indebtedness to him. Four days later, the defendant, a deputy sheriff, attached the goods as their property upon a writ in favor of one of their creditors and subsequently sold them. The action was not entered in court, but the defendant, by the order of Cavanaugh & O’Leary, paid the proceeds of the sale to the attaching creditor. The defendant, attempting to justify under the attachment, alleged that the sale was fraudulent and void as against Cavanaugh & O’Leary’s creditors, because there was not sufficient change of possession. Judgment was ordered for the plaintiff' for the amount of the proceeds of the sale, subject to the defendant’s exception.

*George W. Prescott*and *Burnham, Brown Warren,*for the plaintiff.

*Isaac W. Smitli*and *Goodwin George,*for the defendant.

Pike, J.

Assuming that the sale to the plaintiff was fraudulent as to creditors of Cavanaugh & O’Leary, and that the goods were lawfully attached and sold upon the writ, the sheriff had no power over the proceeds of the sale except to hold them for application according to law. P. 8., *c.*220, *s.*42. The plaintiff’s title was good as against Cavanaugh & O’Leary, and good as against every one else except attaching creditors. *Jones*v. *Bryant,*13 N. H. 53; *Hill*v. *Bank,*45 N. H. 300, 309; *Stevens*v. *Morse,*47 N. H. 532, 535. The failure to return the writ to court dissolved the attachment, and the sheriff became bound to deliver the proceeds of the sale to the .plaintiff. P. S., *c.*220, *s.*36. Pie had no authority to- pay it to the attaching creditor except upon a levy. No execution has been or can now be had, and the defendant’s payment without judgment and levy was unauthorized and is no answer to the present suit.

*201Under similar circumstances, it has been held in Massachusetts that a sheriff cannot justify under his attachment unless he returns his writ to court. *Wilder*v. *Holden,*24 Pick. 8, 12; *Rass*v. *Butterfield,*6 Cush. 242; *Williams*v. *Babbitt,*14 Gray 141.

*Exception overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### §§721a to 724. Repealed. Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §20, 63 Stat. 561

Section 721a, acts Aug. 16, 1937, ch. 665, §2, 50 Stat. 667; July 11, 1941, ch. 290, §2, 55 Stat. 585, related to deposit of damage payments and disbursement. See section 546 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

Section 722, acts July 7, 1884, ch. 332, 23 Stat. 198; June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §6, 36 Stat. 538, related to necessity for contract for expenditure of appropriations.

Section 723, act Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 299, §1, 35 Stat. 973, related to proposals for repair of vessels and specifications.

Section 724, acts June 17, 1910, ch. 301, §8, 36 Stat. 538; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to contracts for materials and necessity for public letting.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective first day of third month after approval by President [Aug. 4, 1949], see section 19 of act Aug. 4, 1949, set out as an Effective Date note preceding chapter 1 of Title 14, Coast Guard.
#### § 2608.210 Procedure in the event of an adverse ruling.

If the court or other competent authority fails to stay the demand or request, the employee upon whom the demand or request is made, unless otherwise advised by the General Counsel, will appear at the stated time and place, produce a copy of this part, state that the employee has been advised by counsel not to provide the requested testimony or produce documents, and respectfully decline to comply with the demand or request, citing *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951). A written response may be offered to a request, or to a demand, if permitted by the court or other competent authority.
### §2802. Definitions

For the purposes of this chapter, the term—

(1) "Administrator" means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency;

(2) "coastal ecosystem" means a system of interacting biological, chemical, and physical components throughout the water column, water surface, and benthic environment of coastal waters;

(3) "coastal water quality" means the physical, chemical and biological parameters that relate to the health and integrity of coastal ecosystems;

(4) "coastal water quality monitoring" means a continuing program of measurement, analysis, and synthesis to identify and quantify coastal water quality conditions and trends to provide a technical basis for decisionmaking;

(5) "coastal waters" means waters of the Great Lakes, including their connecting waters and those portions of rivers, streams, and other bodies of water having unimpaired connection with the open sea up to the head of tidal influence, including wetlands, intertidal areas, bays, harbors, and lagoons, including waters of the territorial sea of the United States and the contiguous zone"; 1 and

(6) "Under Secretary" means Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 102–567, title V, §501, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4294.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone of United States

For extension of territorial sea and contiguous zone of United States, see Proc. No. 5928 and Proc. No. 7219, respectively, set out as notes under section 1331 of Title 43, Public Lands.

1 So in original. The closing quotation marks preceding the semicolon probably should not appear.
EXHIBIT 32.2









CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred
Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(c) | the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(d) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Douglas O. HartDouglas O. Hart Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) Date: March 15, 2010




Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §492. Bridge as post route; limitation as to charges against Government; telegraph and telephone lines

Any bridge built in accordance with the provisions of sections 491 to 494 and 495 to 498 of this title, shall be a lawful structure and shall be recognized and known as a post route, upon which no higher charge shall be made for the transmission over the same of the mails, the troops, and the munitions of war of the United States than the rate per mile paid for the transportation over any railroad, street railway, or public highway leading to said bridge; and the United States shall have the right to construct, maintain, and repair, without any charge therefor, telegraph and telephone lines across and upon said bridge and its approaches; and equal privileges in the use of said bridge and its approaches shall be granted to all telegraph and telephone companies.

(Mar. 23, 1906, ch. 1130, §2, 34 Stat. 85.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0307 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. ROBERT MICHAEL ZERMENO,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 6, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2024

03/26/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0307
#### § 2421.16 Showing of interest.

*Showing of interest* means evidence of membership in a labor organization; employees' signed and dated authorization cards or petitions authorizing a labor organization to represent them for purposes of exclusive recognition; allotment of dues forms executed by an employee and the labor organization's authorized official; current dues records; an existing or recently expired agreement; current exclusive recognition or certification; employees' signed and dated petitions or cards indicating that they no longer desire to be represented for the purposes of exclusive recognition by the currently recognized or certified labor organization; employees' signed and dated petitions or cards indicating a desire that an election be held on a proposed consolidation of units; or other evidence approved by the Authority.
Home > Topics > Mercury

Laws and Regulations
Brochures, Fact Sheets and Reports

Dental Amalgam
Mercury in Fish

NEG/ECP Mercury Documents

Other Links

RI Auto Mercury Collection Law

(as of July 2006) 

## Mercury
Laws and Regulations

New Mercury Regulations (8/1/07) Response to Comments re: New Mercury Regulations (July 2007) RI Mercury Reduction and Education Act (i ncludes all amendments through July 2007) Mercury Reduction Regulations (May 2004) Mercury Reduction Regulations (December 2005) Response to Comments re: Draft Mercury Regulations (April 2004) Response to Comments re: Draft Mercury Regulations (December 2005) 

## Fluorescent Bulb Information

Flourescent Bulb Brochure Mercury Containing Lamp Recyclers Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs (CFLs) and Mercury Information on Proper Di sposal of Compact Fluorescen t Light Bulbs FAQs (CFLs) Mercury in Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) What If I Break a Compact Fluorescent Lamp 

## Brochures, Fact Sheets and Reports Northeast Regional Mercury TM DL Study (approved 12/20/07)) Mercury in Common Household Products Fact Sheet
Productos de Consumo Acredita dos en Contener Mercurio y Sus Alternativas (en Español) Universal Waste Rule Requirements Fact Sheet Used Oil, Mercury Containi ng Lamp Recycling Vendors, Rechargeable Battery and Thermostat Recyclers Automotive Mercury Switch Re moval and Replacement/Labeling RI Mercury Commission Sub

- Group on Mercury in Auto Parts

- Final Report (March 2005) RI Mercury Commission Final Report (April 2005) An Investigation of Altern atives to Mercury Contai ning Products (January 2003) Mercury Spills, Disposal and Clean

- up 

## Mercury in Dental Amalgam DEM Dental Amalgam Mercury Recycling Certification Form Dental Amalgam Containing Mercur y Waste Recycling Annual Report Form New RI Dental Amalgam Separator Requirement
NBC ’ s Best Management Practices for Dentists 

### Page 1 of 2 Rhode Island DEM/Mercury topics index page

7/7/2008 htt p ://www.dem.ri. g ov/to p ics/mercur y .htmFor General Information 222-6800 • After Hours Emergencies 222-3070 • Disclaimer rev. 5/29/087 American Dental Associati on Best Management Practices New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission Web Site on Dental Mercury
Maine Dental Brochure Zero Mercury Campaign 2005 Dental Mercury Report Card 

## Mercury in Fish Final Fish Ingestion Report (March 2006) RI DOH Mercury in Fish Advisory EPA Fish Consumption Advisories
Assessment of Consumer Awareness About Mercury in Fish Rhode Island

- 2005 

## NEG/ECP Mercury Documents 1997 Mercury Resolution 1998 Mercury Action Plan 2003 Report to the NEG/ECP on the Mercury Project 

## Other Mercury Links NEWMOA Mercury Program Interstate Mercury Education & Reduction Clearinghouse Mercury in Schools US EPA's Mercury Information Index Page State of Maine Mercury Information Index Page State of Vermont Mercury Information Index Page 

### Page 2 of 2 Rhode Island DEM/Mercury topics index page

7/7/2008 htt p ://www.dem.ri. g ov/to p ics/mercur y .htm
§ 1201.72 Explanation and scope of discovery. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 72961 , Sept. 9, 2024.
( a ) *Explanation.* Discovery is the process, apart from the hearing, by which a party may obtain relevant information, including the identification of potential witnesses, from another person or a party, that the other person or party has not otherwise provided. Relevant information includes information that appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This information is obtained to assist the parties in preparing and presenting their cases. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may be used as a general guide for discovery practices in proceedings before the Board. Those rules, however, are instructive rather than controlling.
( b ) *Scope.* Discovery covers any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to the issues involved in the appeal, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of documents or other tangible things, and the identity and location of persons with knowledge of relevant facts. Discovery requests that are directed to nonparties and nonparty Federal agencies and employees are limited to information that appears directly material to the issues involved in the appeal.
( c ) *Methods.* Parties may use one or more of the methods provided under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These methods include written interrogatories to parties, depositions, requests for production of documents or things for inspection or copying, and requests for admission.
( d ) *Limitations.* The judge may limit the frequency or extent of use of the discovery methods permitted by these regulations. Such limitations may be imposed if the judge finds that: ( 1 ) The discovery sought is cumulative or duplicative, or is obtainable from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive;
( 2 ) The party seeking discovery has had sufficient opportunity by discovery in the action to obtain the information sought; or
( 3 ) The burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit.
[68 FR 54651, Sept. 18, 2003, as amended at 73 FR 18150, Apr. 3, 2008; 73 FR 21415, Apr. 21, 2008]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLaboratory degradation of Kapton in a low energy oxygen ion beamAn atomic oxygen ion beam, accelerated from a tunable microwave resonant cavity, was used at Lewis Research Center to bombard samples of the widely used polyimide Kapton. The Kapton experienced degradation and mass loss at high rates, which may be comparable to those found in Space Shuttle operations if the activation energy supplied by the beam enabled surface reactions with the ambient oxygen. The simulation reproduced the directionality (ram-wake dependence) of the degradation, the change in optical properties of the degraded materials, and the structure seen in scanning electron micrographs of samples returned on the Shuttle Trails with a substituted argon ion beam produced no rapid degradation. Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDAX) showed significant surface composition changes in all bombarded samples. Mass loss rates and surface composition changes are discussed in terms of the possible oxidation chemistry of the interaction. Finally, the question of how the harmful degradation of materials in low Earth orbit can be minimized is addressed.Document ID19840010242Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsFerguson, D. C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-83530E-1841NAS 1.15:83530Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Shuttle Environment and Operations MeetingLocation: Washington, DCCountry: United StatesStart Date: October 31, 1983End Date: November 2, 1983Accession Number84N18310Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-55-72Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010242.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



th
 Signature
    
    Title/s/ Michael S. LipscombMichael S. Lipscomb
    
    Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director/s/ John S. GloverJohn S. Glover
    
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer/s/ Paul A. SkladPaul A. Sklad
    
    Controller/s/ John DaileaderJohn Daileader
    
    Director/s/ Reginald L. Jones, IIIReginald L. Jones, III
    
    Director/s/ Jeffrey W. LongJeffrey W. Long
    
    Director/s/ Kathleen MoranKathleen Moran
    
    Director/s/ Daniel S. O'ConnellDaniel S. O'Connell
    
    Director/s/ John R. WoodardJohn R. Woodard
    
    Director
M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 1 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 2 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 3 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 4 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 5 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 6 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 7 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 8 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 9 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 10 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 11 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 12 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 13 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 14 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 15 of 16M13003 Pollution Prevention

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED Page 16 of 16