alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 352
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 352 appear at 69 FR 2050, Jan. 13, 2004.

§ 352.505 Proposed termination. At least 45 days before termination of the appointment of an employee entitled to reinstatement, the agency terminating the employee shall notify the employee and his former agency in writing of the proposed termination. However, notification under this section is not required when: ( a ) The termination is at the employee's own request; or
( b ) The employee is reinstated without a break in service under an arrangement made between the agencies concerned.
#### Joseph E. Heller v. Jennie M. Bodensiek.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 330.501 Purpose.

The restrictions in this subpart are designed to prevent circumvention of the open competitive examination system defined in Civil Service Rule 1.3 (5 CFR 1.3). These restrictions limit an appointee's immediate movement to another position after appointment from a competitive certificate of eligibles.
#### §§ 1207.141-1207.149 [Reserved]
§ 190.175 Drawback claimant; maintenance of records. ( a ) *Drawback claimant.* A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) must be the exporter of the exported article, or the refiner, producer, or importer of either the qualified article or the exported article. Any of these persons may designate another person to file the drawback claim.
( b ) *Transfer of merchandise* — ( 1 ) *General.* A drawback claimant under 19 U.S.C. 1313(p) must maintain records (which may be records kept in the normal cause of business) to support the receipt of transferred merchandise and the party transferring the merchandise must maintain records to demonstrate the transfer.
( 2 ) *Article substituted for the qualified article.* ( i ) Subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section, the manufacturer, producer, or importer of a qualified article may transfer to the exporter an article of the same kind and quality as the qualified article in a quantity not greater than the quantity of the qualified article.
( ii ) Subject to paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section, any intermediate party in the chain of commerce leading to the exporter from the manufacturer, producer, or importer of a qualified article may also transfer to the exporter or to another intermediate party an article of the same kind and quality as the article purchased or exchanged from the prior transferor (whether the manufacturer, producer, importer, or another intermediate transferor) in a quantity not greater than the quantity of the article purchased or exchanged.
( iii ) Under either paragraph (b)(2)(i) or (b)(2)(ii) of this section, the article transferred, regardless of its origin (imported, manufactured, substituted, or any combination thereof), will be the qualified article eligible for drawback for purposes of section 1313(p).
( c ) *Maintenance of records.* The manufacturer, producer, importer, transferor, exporter and drawback claimant of the qualified article and the exported article must all maintain their appropriate records required by this part.
§ 302.601 Scope. ( a ) This subpart applies to any situation where an agency moves: ( 1 ) A position from the competitive service to the excepted service, or between excepted services, whether pursuant to statute, Executive Order, or an OPM issuance, to the extent that this subpart is not inconsistent with applicable statutory provisions; or
( 2 ) An employee who has accrued status and civil service protections under 5 U.S.C. chapter 75, subchapter II, involuntarily to any position that is not covered by that chapter or subchapter.
( b ) This subpart also applies in situations where a position previously governed by title 5, United States Code will be governed by another title of the United States Code going forward, unless the statute governing the exception provides otherwise.
Editorial Note on Part 354
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 354 appear at 63 FR 24403, May 4, 1998, and at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

§ 354.3 Sanctions. ( a ) A person determined under this part to have violated an administrative protective order may be subjected to any or all of the following sanctions: ( 1 ) Barring such person from appearing before the International Trade Administration to represent another for a designated time period from the date of publication in the Federal Register of a notice that a violation has been determined to exist;
( 2 ) Denying the person access to business proprietary information for a designated time period from the date of publication in the Federal Register of a notice that a violation has been determined to exist;
( 3 ) Other appropriate administrative sanctions, including striking from the record any information or argument submitted by, or on behalf of, the violating party or the party represented by the violating party; terminating any proceeding then in progress; or revoking any order then in effect;
( 4 ) Requiring the person to return material previously provided by the Secretary and all other materials containing the business proprietary information, such as briefs, notes, or charts based on any such information received under an administrative protective order; and
( 5 ) Issuing a private letter of reprimand.
( b ) ( 1 ) The firm of which a person determined to have violated an administrative protective order is a partner, associate or employee; any partner, associate, employer, or employee of such person; and any person represented by such person may be barred from appearing before the International Trade Administration for a designated time period from the date of publication in the Federal Register of notice that a violation has been determined to exist or may be subjected to the sanctions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, as appropriate.
( 2 ) Each person against whom sanctions are proposed under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is entitled to all the administrative rights set forth in this part separately and apart from rights provided to a person subject to sanctions under paragraph (a) of this section, including the right to a charging letter, right to representation, and right to a hearing, but subject to joinder or consolidation by a presiding official under § 354.12(b).
[53 FR 47920, Nov. 28, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 24404, May 4, 1998]
### §702a–7. Railroad and highway crossings over floodways

The United States shall construct, at its own cost, one railroad and one highway crossing over the Eudora Floodway and not to exceed three railway and two highway crossings over the Morganza Floodway, and not to exceed one railway crossing (together with suitable physical connections therewith) and one highway crossing over the floodway west of the Atchafalaya River provided for in the modified project: Provided, That equitable agreements can be made with the railroad and highway authorities concerned and that the appropriate railroad or highway agencies agree to accept and maintain and operate these crossings without cost to the United States: Provided further, That the railroads crossing the Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways agree in consideration for the crossings constructed to waive all claims against the Government for any damages that may occur by reason of overflows in the Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways: And provided further, That other railway and highway damages shall be adjusted as provided for in section 702a–10 of this title.

(June 15, 1936, ch. 548, §7, 49 Stat. 1510.)
§ 2604.201 Public reading room facility and Web site. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Location of public reading room facility.* OGE maintains a public reading room facility at its offices located at 1201 New York Avenue NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005-3917. Persons desiring to utilize the reading room facility should contact OGE, in writing or by telephone: 202-482-9300, TDD: 202-482-9293, or FAX: 202-482-9237, to arrange a time to inspect the materials available there.
( 2 ) *Web site.* The records listed in paragraph (b) of this section that were created on or after November 1, 1996, or which OGE is otherwise able to make electronically available, along with the OGE FOIA and Public Records Guide and OGE's annual FOIA reports, are also available via OGE's Web site (*www.oge.gov*). OGE will proactively identify additional records of interest to the public and will post such records on its Web site when practicable.
( b ) *Records available.* The OGE Web site contains OGE records which are required by 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) to be made available for public inspection in an electronic format, including: ( 1 ) Any final opinions, as well as orders, made in the adjudication of cases;
( 2 ) Any statements of policy and interpretation which have been adopted by OGE and are not published in the Federal Register;
( 3 ) Any administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect a member of the public, and which are not exempt from disclosure under section (b) of the FOIA;
( 4 ) Copies of records created by OGE that have been released to any person under subpart C of this part and that, because of the nature of their subject matter, OGE determines have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records or that have been requested three or more times; and
( 5 ) A general index of the records referred to under § 2604.201(b)(4).
( c ) OGE may delete from the copies of materials made available under this section any identifying details necessary to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Any such deletions will be explained in writing and the extent of such deletions will be indicated on the portion of the records that are made available or published, unless the indication would harm an interest protected by the FOIA exemption pursuant to which the deletions are made. If technically feasible, the extent of any such deletions will be indicated at the place in the records where they are made.
[80 FR 57073, Sept. 22, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 94216, Dec. 23, 2016]
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-06-29T16:19:19Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-06-29T16:19:23Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-06-29T16:19:23Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="104838">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-06-29T16:19:19Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>TEEAZTORNEYGENERAL 
OF TEXAS 
AUSTIN.TEXAS </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<p>\ 
. </p>
<p></p>
<div class="ocr">oF. < .
a A
:

coo, BMP RE age

Texnc “tute iarkse Board, i’age 2

to street ar house to house, in the aity or its suttur ba.”
Kochminn vw. Baanelteter, 63 He. ¥. ©. 503, 505, 49 Apvellate
Divial an 369, 3716

<t is our opinion thet the Legislature intendec the
approprittion for “treveling expenzes” te be ayallishle for
defraying thore items of expense ovessioned by the saking of
trips from ona lceslity to another.

You are therefore advised thet expenses occasioned
by the operation of « truck within a pertiouler tate park
for the care ani upkeep of that park sbould not be charged
to the tréveling expense appr tion, but to the nalatensnce
appropriation provided by Legislature for the particular
“tate perks fn gonnectién with which the expentiture is ine

Yours very traly Loe
ACTOREEY GENERAL OF. TEXAT
By /a/ RK. %. Paleoni1e |.

a } 13 19h0 + wetet
jaf Gevars Cc. lam | eT,
ATTORAEY GENERAL OF TETA APPROVED OPINION COMMIT STEE

BY BYE, Cheirran
</div>

</div>
</body></html>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofFirstwave Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: November 12, 2002 |   | /s/ Richard T. Brock    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Richard T. Brock        |   |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                     |   |                    |   |
|                     |   |                    |   |
| Dated: November 12, 2002 |   | /s/ Judith A. Vitale    |   |
|                     |   | Judith A. Vitale        |   |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
**Exhibit12.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Thilo Kusch,certify that:

1.               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 20-F of Magyar Telekom;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.               The Company’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a.) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b.) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of  the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The Company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

a.) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: February 22, 2007 |   |   |   |                    |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   |   |   |                    |
|                    |   |   |   |                    |
|                    |   | By:    |   | /s/ Thilo Kusch         |
|                    |   | Name:  |   | Thilo Kusch             |
|                    |   | Title: |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
### **CHAPTER 16—LIGHTHOUSES**

Sec.
711 to 734. Repealed or Transferred.
735.
Marking pierheads in certain lakes.
736 to 776. Repealed or Transferred.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00575-CV

IN THE ESTATE of Carlos AGUILAR, Deceased

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PB4-000048-L2

Honorable Victor Villarreal, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 23, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

On March 29, 2021, this court abated this appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court 

to effectuate the parties’ settlement agreement. On June 10, 2021, the parties filed a “Joint Motion 

to Dismiss Appeal.” We reinstate this cause on the docket of this court, grant the joint motion, and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
### §467h. Reports

Not later than 90 days after the end of each odd-numbered fiscal year, the Administrator shall submit a report to Congress that—

(1) describes the status of the Program;

(2) describes the progress achieved by Federal agencies during the 2 preceding fiscal years in implementing the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety;

(3) describes the progress achieved in dam safety by States participating in the Program; and

(4) includes any recommendations for legislative and other action that the Administrator considers necessary.

(Pub. L. 92–367, §12, formerly §10, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(8), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3692; renumbered §11 and amended Pub. L. 107–310, §§5(1), 6, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2453; renumbered §12 and amended Pub. L. 113–121, title III, §3001(a)(1), (d)(1), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1282, 1283.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 467h, Pub. L. 92–367, §9, as added Pub. L. 99–662, title XII, §1201(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4262, provided for creation of National Dam Safety Review Board, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §215(c)(2), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3685.

A prior section 12 of Pub. L. 92–367 was renumbered section 13, and is classified to section 467i of this title.

Another prior section 12 of Pub. L. 92–367 was classified to section 467k of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–121, §3001(a)(1), substituted "Administrator" for "Director" in two places.

2002—Pub. L. 107–310, §6, struck out subsec. designations and headings for subsecs. (a) and (b) and text of subsec. (a) which read as follows: "Not later than 180 days after October 12, 1996, the Director shall report to Congress on the availability of dam insurance and make recommendations concerning encouraging greater availability."
#### Bronislaus L. Ziomek, Respondent, v. Edward Sciera et al., Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (Appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present— MeCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Piper and Wheeler, JJ.
#### § 2638.301 In general.

Every agency must carry out a government ethics education program to teach employees how to identify government ethics issues and obtain assistance in complying with government ethics laws and regulations. An agency's failure to comply with any of the education or notice requirements set forth in this subpart does not exempt an employee from applicable government ethics requirements.
#### Benjamin W. Noxon, Appellant, *v.*John Peck et al., Executors, etc., Respondents.

(Argued November 20, 1878;

decided December 3, 1878.)

*John M. Carroll*for appellant.

*Robert H. McClellan*for respondents.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Fast Works Company for General Trading Ltd. ) ASBCA No. 63014

)

Under Contract No. W56KGZ

- 21

- P

- 6000 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. Mezgin Saeed Mohsin

CEO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Weston E. Borkenhagen, JA

CPT Timothy M. McLister, JA

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated : October 1 9 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63014

, Appeal of Fast Works

Company for General Trading Ltd. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 19, 2022 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2006
(the "Report"), I, Stan Cipkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company.




                                       /s/ Stan Cipkowski
                                       ------------------
                                       Chief Executive Officer

                                       February 24, 2006