alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2330d. Public recreational amenities in ecosystem restoration projects

At the request of a non-Federal interest, the Secretary is authorized to study the incorporation of public recreational amenities, including facilities for hiking, biking, walking, and waterborne recreation, into a project for ecosystem restoration, including a project carried out under section 2330 of this title, if the incorporation of such amenities would be consistent with the ecosystem restoration purposes of the project.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. H, title LXXXI, §8105, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3699.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2022, and also as part of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 8002 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Presidential Documents

62793

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 207

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2005–01 of October 7, 2004

Determination Pursuant to Section 2(c)(1) of the Migration 

and Refugee Assistance Act of 1962, as Amended 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee Assistance Act 

of 1962, as amended, 22 U.S.C. 2601(c)(1), I hereby determine that it is 

important to the national interest that up to $8 million be made available 

from the U.S. Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund to meet 

unexpected urgent refugee and migration needs related to the Burundi refugee 

repatriation and reintegration. These funds may be used, as appropriate, 

to provide contributions to international, governmental, and nongovernmental 

organizations, and, as necessary, for administrative expenses of the Bureau 

of Population, Refugees, and Migration. 

You are authorized and directed to inform the appropriate committees of 

the Congress of this determination and the obligation of funds under this 

authority, and to arrange for the publication of this memorandum in the 

[FR Doc. 04–24130

Filed 10–26–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 

Federal Register

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 7, 2004. 

.

W
454 P.2d 973

#### Carlos ORTIZ and Diana Ortiz, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Joe ANGEL, District Judge of the Fourth Judicial District Court of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 8862.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 10, 1969.

NOBLE, Chief Justice and MOISE, COMPTON, TACKETT, and WATSON, Justices, concurring;

Ordered that petition for writ of prohibition be and the same is hereby denied-
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-111 September 13, 2004

REVISED: NRC MODIFIES AVAILABILITY OF

SECURITY INFORMATION FOR ALL NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that certain security information formerly

included in the Reactor Oversight Process will no longer be publicly available, and will no longer be

updated on the agency’s Web site.

“The Commission has a responsibility for public health and safety, and that responsibility is

evaluated in considering which information should be made public,” said NRC Chairman Nils Diaz. 

“We deliberated for many months on finding the balance between the NRC’s commitment to openness

and the concern that sensitive information might be misused by those who wish us harm.”

The NRC will continue to inspect and assess physical security of nuclear facilities, but the

results will no longer be made publicly available upon issuance. If the Commission receives a

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for security-related information, including associated

enforcement information, the Commission will carefully review the records under the FOIA legal

standards and would expect to apply appropriate FOIA exemptions to withhold any information the

release of which could harm public health and safety or the common defense and security or could

assist in the circumvention of law. The NRC will continue to provide pertinent information to state

officials, local law enforcement agencies and other federal agencies. 

For more information on the changes, contact Steven Stein at 301-415-0221 or Ronald Frahm at

301-415-2986.

###
Order 2013

- 6

- 7 Served: June 10, 2013



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 10 th of June, 2013

Essential Air Service at

KAMUELA

, HAWAII

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET OST

- 1997

- 2833

Order Extending Service Obligation

S ummary By this Order, the Department extends the Essential Air Serv i ce (EAS) ob l igation of Pacific Wings, LLC.

, at Kamuela

, Hawaii , for an additional 30 days, though August 11

, 201 3

.

Background

On March 14, 2013

, Pacific Wings filed a 90

- day notice of intent to suspend its subsidy

free EAS at Kamuela

, Hawaii . Order 201 3

- 4

- 17

, April 25, 2013 , prohibited Pacific Wings from suspending service through July 12 , 201 3, consisting of twelve nonstop round trips per week to Kahului (OGG), with 9

- seat Cessna Caravan aircraft , and requested proposals for replacement service

. We have received proposals from Pacific Wings, Mokule le Airlines, and Makani Kai, and have requested community comments. However, we will not have completed the carrier

- selection process by July 12, 2013, the

end of the current 30

- day hold in. Therefore, i n accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 41734 (c)

, we must ext end Pacific Wings ’s service obligation for an additional 30 days, thru August 11, 2013, or until replacement service actually begins, whichever occurs first.

This Order is issued under authority assigned in 14 CFR Part 385.12(k)(5)

.

Accordingly,

1. We require Pacific Wings, LLC. , to maintain the level of Essential A ir S ervice it was required to provide by Order 2013

- 4

- 17 , the same level it was providing when it filed notice

, thru August 11, 2013;

2. Th i s docket will remain open until further O rder of the Depart m ent; and3. We will serve a copy of this O rder on the State of Hawaii , and the civic officials of

Kamuela

, Hawaii , and on Pacific Wings, LLC.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this O rder under the Department’s Regulations, 14 CFR Part 385.3 1(a) must file such petitions within seven ( 7 ) days after the date of service of this O rder.

This Order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
#### § 2428.1 Scope.

This part sets forth procedures under which the Authority, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7105(a)(2)(I), will enforce decisions and orders of the Assistant Secretary in standards of conduct matters arising under 5 U.S.C. 7120.
### §513. Notice, hearings, and findings

Whenever any bridge shall, in the opinion of the Secretary, at any time unreasonably obstruct such navigation, it shall be the duty of the Secretary, after notice to interested parties, to hold a hearing at which the bridge owner, those interested in water navigation thereunder or therethrough, those interested in either railroad or highway traffic thereover, and any other party or parties in interest shall have full opportunity to offer evidence and be heard as to whether any alteration of such bridge is needed, and if so what alterations are needed, having due regard to the necessity of free and unobstructed water navigation and to the necessities of the rail or highway traffic. If, upon such hearing, the Secretary determines that any alterations of such bridge are necessary in order to render navigation through or under it reasonably free, easy, and unobstructed, having due regard also for the necessities of rail or highway traffic thereover, he shall so find and shall issue and cause to be served upon interested parties an order requiring such alterations of such bridge as he finds to be reasonably necessary for the purposes of navigation.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §3, 54 Stat. 498.)
#### § 2636.302 Relationship to other laws and regulations.

The limitations and restrictions contained in this section are in addition to any limitations and restrictions imposed upon an employee by applicable standards of conduct or by reason of any statute or regulation relating to conflicts of interest. Even though conduct or the receipt of compensation is not prohibited by this subpart, an employee should accept compensation or engage in the activity for which compensation is offered only after determining that it is otherwise permissible. In particular, a covered noncareer employee should accept compensation only after determining that its receipt does not violate section 102 of Executive Order 12674, as amended, which prohibits a covered noncareer employee who is also a Presidential appointee to a full-time noncareer position from receiving *any* outside earned income for outside employment or for any other activity performed during that Presidential appointment.

[56 FR 1723, Jan. 17, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 43069, Aug. 12, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1577 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 1577

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2003

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the visitor center in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument 
    in Arizona as the ``Kris Eggle Visitor Center'', and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that in August 2002, Kris Eggle, a 28-
year-old park ranger in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, was 
murdered in the line of duty along the border between the United States 
and Mexico.
    (b) Dedication.--Congress dedicates the visitor center in Organ 
Pipe Cactus National Monument to Kris Eggle and to promoting awareness 
of the risks taken each day by all public land management law 
enforcement officers.
    (c) Redesignation.--The visitor center in Organ Pipe Cactus 
National Monument in Arizona is hereby designated as the ``Kris Eggle 
Visitor Center''.
    (d) Reference.--Any reference to the visitor center in Organ Pipe 
Cactus National Monument in Arizona, in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the ``Kris Eggle Visitor Center''.
    (e) Signage.--The Secretary of the Interior shall post interpretive 
signs at the visitor center and at the trailhead of the Baker Mine-
Milton Mine Loop that--
            (1) describe the important role of public law enforcement 
        officers in protecting park visitors;
            (2) refer to the tragic loss of Kris Eggle in underscoring 
        the importance of these officers;
            (3) refer to the dedication of the trail and the visitor 
        center by Congress; and
            (4) include a copy of this Act and an image of Kris Eggle.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                            By Martha C. Morrison,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de
C.V. for the period ended December 31, 2002, I, Ricardo B. Salinas Pliego, Chief
Executive Officer of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.      this Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2.      the information contained in this Form 20-F for the period ended
December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V.

Date: June 30, 2003              /s/ Richardo B. Salinas Pliego
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 Ricardo B. Salinas Pliego
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Azteca Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and will be retained by Azteca
Holdings, S.A. de C.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1658 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                    September 15, 2004.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
1658) entitled ``An Act to amend the Railroad Right-of-Way Conveyance 
Validation Act to validate additional conveyances of certain lands in 
the State of California that form part of the right-of-way granted by 
the United States to facilitate the construction of the 
transcontinental railway, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the 
following

                               AMENDMENT:

    Page 2, line 12, strike out [104] and insert: 401

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1658

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
### §315. Continuing in office

When the term of office of an officer of the Department of the Treasury ends, the officer may continue to serve until a successor is appointed and qualified.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 880, §309; renumbered §310, Pub. L. 101–73, title III, §307(a)(1), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 352; renumbered §311, Pub. L. 107–56, title III, §361(a)(1), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 329; renumbered §312, Pub. L. 108–177, title I, §105(a)(1)(A), Dec. 13, 2003, 117 Stat. 2603; renumbered §315, Pub. L. 111–203, title V, §502(a)(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1580.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 309 | 31:1016. | Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 187 (1st par. under heading "Treasury Department"), 28 Stat. 844. |

In the section, the words "When the term of office . . . ends" are substituted for "whose terms of office have expired or shall expire" for consistency and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "may continue to serve" are substituted for "The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to pay", "and who have been performing or shall perform the duties of their respective offices after the date of such expiration", and "the salary, compensation, fees, or emoluments authorized or provided by law in each case for the respective incumbents of the offices" because of 25 Op. Atty. Gen. 636 (1906) and for consistency with other titles of the United States Code. The words "until a successor is appointed and qualified" are substituted for "before the appointment and qualification of their successors" and 31:1016 (last sentence) for consistency with other titles of the Code.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 renumbered section 312 of this title as this section.

2003—Pub. L. 108–177 renumbered section 311 of this title as this section.

2001—Pub. L. 107–56 renumbered section 310 of this title as this section.

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 renumbered section 309 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
### §1308b. Transfer of computer hardware, software and other technical equipment

In fiscal year 2015 and each fiscal year thereafter, with funds available for the Technical Innovation and Professional Services program in this or any other Act with respect to any fiscal year, the Secretary may transfer title for computer hardware, software and other technical equipment to State and tribal regulatory and reclamation programs.

(Pub. L. 113–235, div. F, title I, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is div. F of Pub. L. 113–235, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2396, known as the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the appropriation act cited as the credit to this section, and not as part of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriations act:

Pub. L. 113–76, div. G, title I, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 299.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFERY EDEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 368 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFERY EDEN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 369 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the “Registrant”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.               The Registrant’s quarterly report on Form10-Q (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents in all material respects the results of operations of theRegistrant for the periods covered by the Report and the Registrant’s financialcondition as of the end of those periods.

 
| Date: November 7, 2003 |   | /s/ Robert  P. Akins                     |   |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Robert P. Akins, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toCymer, Inc. and will be retained by Cymer, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
!"#

$

	 %

&




%

& 

&


%%



%


%'


'



&


(



%





 '% 
%


 	
 	
      

  	
  
 

  	
  
 

&)*$(*   
 	 

 + ,-   ./-0 -  +1 234 56! ,-6077 2+ 8+9 9--:  : ;--+* 0 6+ 57 <7-6* 
20 +0+7 <7-6* =) 1!* >79 <-<<7* +>-;7;-- ,-60* 56! 80>0--/ >0- *  :  ++#0 8+> . 5>3*
+-9#0: ;< /-0 >0->0 :+>-7 -/ ,- 1+ : +1* +,-<0>9 :+0,+-
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Advanced Reactor Licensing: Experience with Digital I&C Technology in Evolutionary Plants (NUREG/CR-6842,ORNL/TM-2004/74)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6842 (PDF - 5.31 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:** March 2004**Date Published:**April 2004

**Prepared by:** R.T. Wood, S.A. Arndt Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

J.R. Easter Preferred Licensing Services P.O. Box 14431 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15239-0431

K. Korsah, J.S. Neal, E.L. Quinn Longenecker & Associates P.O. Box 3094 Del Mar, California 92014-6904

G.W. Remley (Consultant) 205 Harrow Drive Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238-2530 

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Primary Contractor) Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6010 Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC

Steven A. Arndt, NRC Project Manager

**Prepared for:** Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code Y6478

Availability Notice

## Abstract

This report presents the findings from a study of experience with digital instrumentation and controls (I&C) technology in evolutionary nuclear power plants. In particular, this study evaluated regulatory approaches employed by the international nuclear power community for licensing advanced I&C systems and identified lessons learned. The report (1) gives an overview of the modern I&C technologies employed at numerous evolutionary nuclear power plants, (2) identifies performance experience derived from those applications, (3) discusses regulatory processes employed and issues that have arisen, (4) captures lessons learned from performance and regulatory experience, (5) suggests anticipated issues that may arise from international near-term deployment of reactor concepts, and (6) offers conclusions and recommendations for potential activities to support advanced reactor licensing in the United States.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
### NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS:

Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Water Heaters, Direct

Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters

November 23, 2009

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliance and Commercia l Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.,

and

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDREW GINES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 57 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6 th day of October , 2022, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.