alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 201: Aeronautical Operational Control 
(AOC) Message Hazard Mitigation (AMHM)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 201 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 201: Aeronautical Operational Control 
(AOC) Message Hazard Mitigation (AMHM).

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 17-19, 2003, beginning at 9 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at American Airlines Flight 
Academy, 4601 Highway 360, FAA Road, Fort Worth, Texas 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; 
fax (202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. (2) Mr. Harold 
Hohlen, (817) 967-9500, e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df97beadb0b3bbf197b0b7b3bab19fbebef1bcb0b2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="642c05160b08004a2c0b0c08010a2405054a070b09">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purusant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 201 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    February 17:

<bullet<ls-thn-eq> Opening Session (Welcome, Introductory and 
Administrative Remarks, Review Agenda, Background).
<bullet<ls-thn-eq> Review of phonecon discussions and conclusions.
<bullet<ls-thn-eq> Drafting group work on other sections of the 
document:
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Subgroup A Section 2
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Subgroup B Section 3
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Subgroup C Section 4
<bullet<ls-thn-eq> Closing Session (Other Business, Date and Place of 
Next Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn).

    Note: This agenda will be followed as appropriate over the course 
of 3 days.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 9, 2004.
Robert Zoldos,
FAA System Engineer, RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 04-2449 Filed 2-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No.: 05-024 February 8, 2005

NRC CONSIDERS CHANGES TO REGULATIONS

ON SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering putting into its regulations a variety of

security-information-handling actions directed by the Commission since Sept. 11, 2001.

The information involved, known as “Safeguards Information,” is a special category of

sensitive unclassified information authorized to be protected under the Atomic Energy Act. In many

ways it is handled like classified information. Individuals provided access to Safeguards Information

must have a valid “need to know” such information and, for certain categories of information, must

undergo a criminal history check, including fingerprinting.

The unauthorized release of this information could result in harm to public health and safety

and the nation’s common defense and security. Release could also effect damage to the country’s

critical infrastructure, including nuclear power plants and other facilities and materials licensed and

regulated by the NRC.

Information designated as Safeguards Information must be protected from unauthorized

disclosure and must be physically controlled and protected. Physical protection requirements include

secure storage, document marking, limited reproduction, protected transmission and controls for

information processing on electronic systems.

As provided in the Atomic Energy Act, inadequate protection of Safeguards Information,

including inadvertent release and unauthorized disclosure, may result in civil and/or criminal penalties;

willful violation is a felony subject to fines or imprisonment. 

Some types of NRC licensees, such as nuclear power reactors, are already required by NRC

regulations to have a Safeguards Information protection program. NRC issued orders after September

11 that expanded the types of information to be protected by such licensees. Other orders were issued

to licensees not previously explicitly subject to Safeguards Information protection requirements in the

regulations, such as certain licensees authorized to manufacture or initially transfer items containing

radioactive material.

Although new Safeguards Information requirements could continue to be imposed by issuance

of orders, it has been Commission policy to codify requirements in the regulations and not rely

indefinitely on orders to impose needed generic requirements.
2

Further details on the proposed changes to the regulations are described in a Federal Register

notice to be published shortly. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to the

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-0001, Attention:

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be submitted electronically by e-mail to

SECY@nrc.gov ; or via the NRC’s rulemaking website at http: //ruleforum.llnl.gov . The comments

should be submitted within 45 days after the publication of the Federal Register notice.

###
§ 295.102 Applicability. This part applies to demands and requests to employees of OPM in legal proceedings in which OPM is not a named party, for factual or expert testimony relating to official information or for production of official records or information. However, it does not apply to: ( a ) Demands upon or requests for a current OPM employee to testify as to facts or events that are unrelated to his or her official duties or that are unrelated to the functions of OPM;
( b ) Demands upon or requests for a former OPM employee to testify as to matters in which the former employee was not directly or materially involved while at OPM;
( c ) Requests for the release of records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(a); and
( d ) Congressional or Government Accountability Office (GAO) demands and requests for testimony or records.
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1545

To prohibit Federal officials from paying any Federal funds to any individual 

or entity that performs partial-birth abortions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2003

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To prohibit Federal officials from paying any Federal funds 

to any individual or entity that performs partial-birth 

abortions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partial-Birth Abortion 

5 Funding Ban Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST PAYMENT OF FEDERAL 

7 FUNDS TO INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES THAT 

8 PERFORM PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTIONS. 

9 (a) PROHIBITION.—Consistent with the just com10 pensation clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitu-
2

•HR 1545 IH 

1 tion, no Federal official may pay any Federal funds to 

2 any individual or entity that performs partial-birth abor3 tions. 

4 (b) DEFINITION.—The term ‘‘partial-birth abortion’’ 

5 means an abortion in which—

6 (1) the person performing the abortion delib7 erately and intentionally vaginally delivers a living 

8 fetus until, in the case of a head-first presentation, 

9 the entire fetal head is outside the body of the moth10 er, or, in the case of breech presentation, any part 

11 of the fetal trunk past the navel is outside the body 

12 of the mother for the purpose of performing an overt 

13 act that the person knows will kill the partially deliv14 ered living fetus; and 

15 (2) performs the overt act, other than comple16 tion of delivery, that kills the partially delivered liv17 ing fetus.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS, SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                      7,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,357
<PP&E>                                          34,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,347
<BONDS>                                          6,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,417
<SALES>                                         36,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,207
<CGS>                                           25,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,371
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    32
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,749)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (68)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,681)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

Arlington, Texas 76011-8064

RIV: 99-35 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT: Breck Henderson October 13, 1999

OFFICE: 817-860-8128

PAGER: 888-876-2331

Cellular: 817-917-1227

E-Mail: bwh@nrc.gov

NRC TO MEET WITH PUBLIC IN CALIFORNIA TO DISCUSS

GE VALLECITOS NUCLEAR CENTER

Interested citizens and media invited to attend

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with the public on Wednesday, October 20, from 7:00 to

9:00 p.m. to present information on the GE Vallecitos Nuclear Center and answer questions from local officials

and the general public.

The meeting will be at the Shrine Events Center, 170 Lindbergh Avenue, Livermore, California. All interested

citizens are invited to attend.

GE Vallecitos is located near Pleasanton, California. The meeting was requested by public officials

representing Alameda County and the City of Pleasanton to discuss federally-licensed activities at GE

Vallecitos, shipments of irradiated nuclear fuel received at the facility, and the work done with the fuel after it

arrives.

The GE Vallecitos site has been engaged in research, development, testing, and post irradiation examination of

reactor fuel since the 1950's. The GE Vallecitos site includes a Radioactive Materials Laboratory where the

post-irradiation examinations are done. The site also has three permanently shutdown reactor facilities which

were part of the early technology development programs for commercial nuclear power. A small, 100 kilowatt

research reactor is still in operation at the site. GE Vallecitos also fabricates radioactive sources used in

medicine and industry under a license issued by the State of California.
The meeting will include a short presentation by representatives of GE Vallecitos on site history and current

operations. This will be followed by presentations by NRC representatives on the licensing and inspection

programs covering the various activities authorized by the NRC licenses issued to GE Vallecitos.

The meeting is not a hearing and is not being held as a formal proceeding related to the regulation of the GE

Vallecitos facility. However, members of the public will have an opportunity to ask questions.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 03-019 February 11, 2003

NRC ORDERS MODIFICATIONS TO PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR

VESSEL HEAD INSPECTIONS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an immediately effective Order to licensees

operating pressurized water reactors (PWRs), establishing a minimum set of reactor pressure vessel

(RPV) head inspection requirements. The Order is part of the Commission’s ongoing efforts to ensure

public health and safety following the discovery of degradation in the RPV head at the Davis-Besse

reactor in Oak Harbor, Ohio.

The Order requires that licensees conduct bare metal visual examinations of the entire vessel

head surface and non-visual examinations of each RPV head penetration. These enhanced inspection

requirements maintain the graded approach described in a bulletin that the NRC issued on August 9 of

last year (Bulletin 2002-02, “Reactor Pressure Vessel Head and Vessel Head Penetration Nozzle

Inspection Programs”), in that licensees must increase the frequency of inspections as the head’s

susceptibility to degradation increases. 

The Order is considered an interim measure until enhanced inspection requirements acceptable

to the NRC are incorporated into the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure

Vessel Code and related NRC regulations.

A copy of the entire Order will be posted on the NRC web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation/news.html

under News and Correspondence.

###
§ 2638.306 Notice to new supervisors. The agency must provide each employee upon initial appointment to a supervisory position with the written information required under this section. ( a ) *Coverage.* This requirement applies to each civilian employee who is required to receive training pursuant to 5 CFR 412.202(b).
( b ) *Deadline.* The agency must provide the written materials required by this section within 1 year of the employee's initial appointment to the supervisory position.
( c ) *Written materials.* The written materials must include contact information for the agency's ethics office and the text of § 2638.103. In addition, a copy of, a hyperlink to, or the address of a Web site containing the Principles of Ethical Conduct must be included, as well as such other information as the DAEO deems necessary for new supervisors.
( d ) *Tracking.* Each agency must establish written procedures, which the DAEO must review each year, for supervisory ethics notices. In the case of an agency with 1,000 or more employees, the DAEO must review any submissions under § 2638.310 each year to confirm that the agency has implemented an appropriate process for meeting the requirements of this section.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2002 (the
"Report"), I, Gerald A. Moore, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company.



                                                     /s/ Gerald A. Moore
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Gerald A. Moore
                                                     Chairman of the Board and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                     August 7, 2002
#### § 146.36 Examination of merchandise.

Except for direct delivery procedures provided for in § 146.39, all merchandise covered by a Customs Form 214 may be retained for Customs examination at the place of unlading, the zone, or another location, as designated by the port director. The port director may authorize release of the merchandise without examination, as provided in § 151.2 of this chapter. If a physical examination is conducted, the Customs officer shall note the results of the examination on the examination invoices.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-03-0022 - Proposed Export of Depleted Uranium to Japan (XSOU08790).

Accession Number: ML030650707

Date Released: Thursday, March 6, 2003

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML030420272 - SECY-03-0022 - Proposed Export of Depleted Uranium to Japan (XSOU8790). (5 page(s), 2/14/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
### §§191, 192. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(a), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section 191, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 99; Aug. 5, 1963, Pub. L. 88–84, §2, 77 Stat. 116, made general provision for sound signals for fog, etc.

Section 192, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 99, related to speed of vessels in fog, etc.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 24, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Multimedia Games, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of
the undersigned, Patrick J. Ramsey, Interim President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Adam D. Chibib, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, based upon each of their
respective knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m);
      and




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      May 7, 2010
            /s/
      Patrick J. RamseyPatrick
      J. RamseyInterim
      President and Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Adam D. ChibibAdam
      D. ChibibChief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Multimedia Games, Inc., and will
be retained by Multimedia Games, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-120 October 10, 2002

NRC SIGNS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WITH EPA ON CLEANUP OF RADIOACTIVELY CONTAMINATED SITES

On October 9 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission signed an agreement with the Environmental

Protection Agency on the radiological decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites.

The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by NRC and EPA provides that EPA will

defer exercise of authority under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Liability Act (Superfund) for the majority of facilities decommissioned under NRC authority. The

MOU includes provisions for NRC and EPA consultation for certain sites when, at the time of license

termination, (1) groundwater contamination exceeds EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC contemplates

restricted release of the site; and/or (3) residual radioactive soil concentrations exceed levels defined in

the MOU. 

The MOU responds to a 1999 report from the House Committee on Appropriations that stated:

“In the interest of ensuring that sites do not face dual regulation, the Committee strongly encourages

both agencies to enter into an MOU which clarifies the circumstances for EPA’s involvement at NRC

sites when requested by the NRC.” The MOU also is responsive to a Government Accounting Office

report issued in 2000. 

The MOU does not fully meet the intent of the Appropriations Committee because the threat of

dual regulation remains for certain licensees. Thus, although the MOU reduces dual jurisdiction, the

NRC will continue efforts to seek legislation that would eliminate the possibility of dual regulation of

all NRC decommissioning licensees.

The MOU does not impose any new requirements on NRC licensees and will reduce the

involvement of EPA with NRC licensees who are decommissioning. Most sites are expected to meet

the NRC criteria for unrestricted use, and NRC believes that only a few sites will have groundwater or

soil contamination in excess of the levels specified in the MOU which trigger consultation with EPA. 

If there are other hazardous materials on the site, EPA may be involved in cleanup. 

###