alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1227 to 1231. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–282, title IV, §402(e), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4264

Section 1227, Pub. L. 92–340, §8, formerly title I, §107, July 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 427; renumbered and amended Pub. L. 95–474, §2, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1476, related to investigatory powers of the Secretary. See section 70035 of Title 46, Shipping.

Section 1228, Pub. L. 92–340, §9, as added Pub. L. 95–474, §2, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1476; amended Pub. L. 101–380, title IV, §4106(c), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 514, related to conditions for entry to ports in the United States. See section 70021 of Title 46.

Section 1229, Pub. L. 92–340, §10, as added Pub. L. 95–474, §2, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1477; amended Pub. L. 98–557, §29(h), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2875, related to delegations of authority with respect to the Saint Lawrence Seaway. See section 70032 of Title 46.

Section 1230, Pub. L. 92–340, §11, as added Pub. L. 95–474, §2, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1477; amended Pub. L. 105–383, title III, §313, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3424, related to international agreements. See section 70005 of Title 46.

Section 1231, Pub. L. 92–340, §12, as added Pub. L. 95–474, §2, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1477, related to regulations necessary to implement this chapter. See section 70034 of Title 46.
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Inthe matter of National PowerCorporation ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2013-0620

Motion for Extension for Time 

# RECEIVED SEP 15 2015 

## HEARING DOCKET

The FAA requests a 30-day extension oftime to file its appeal briefin this matter. FAA counsel has sought the approval ofRespondent's counsel, Martin A. Blumenthal, for this extension oftime; however, 

### Mr. Blumenthal has been away from his office and has not responded to the FAA's effortto seekhis approval. The brief, which currentlyis due on September 17,2015, would nowbe due on October 19,2015 with the extension oftime. The extension is necessary so that the attorney assigned to prepare the appeal briefin the case will have sufficient time to review the record, researchthe issues, and prepare the brief. The windowto prepare the appeal briefwas cut short when the case
was transferred from our office in Chicago to headquarters for the appellate work.Based onthe foregoing and pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233( c)(2), the FAA requests that the FAA Decisionmaker grant this motion for an extension oftime to file the appeal brief. Peter 

### J. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement By:



# ~~ $'usan S. Caron Enforcement Division, AGC-300 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington D.C. 20591 email: susan.caron@faa.gov Telephone: (202) 267-7721 Fax: (202) 267-5106 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certifY thatthe foregoing Motion for Extension ofTime inFAA 2013- 0620 has been served by email (marty@blumenthallaw.com) and U.S. Certified Mail, return-receipt requested addressed to: MartinA. Blumenthal, Esq. I Northfield Plaza, Suite 300 Northfiled, IL 60093 and by hand-carriage to: Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, AGC-430 2
### §2281. Matters to be addressed in planning

#### (a) In general

Enhancing national economic development (including benefits to particular regions of the Nation not involving the transfer of economic activity to such regions from other regions), the quality of the total environment (including preservation and enhancement of the environment), the well-being of the people of the United States, the prevention of loss of life, and the preservation of cultural and historical values shall be addressed in the formulation and evaluation of water resources projects to be carried out by the Secretary, and the associated benefits and costs, both quantifiable and unquantifiable, and information regarding potential loss of human life that may be associated with flooding and coastal storm events, shall be displayed in the benefits and costs of such projects.

#### (b) Assessments

For all feasibility reports for water resources projects completed after December 31, 2007, the Secretary shall assess whether—

(1) the water resources project and each separable element is cost-effective; and

(2) the water resources project complies with Federal, State, and local laws (including regulations) and public policies.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title IX, §904, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4185; Pub. L. 101–640, title III, §315, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4641; Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §231, Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3704; Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2033(a), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1084.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–114 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1996—Pub. L. 104–303 inserted "and information regarding potential loss of human life that may be associated with flooding and coastal storm events," after "unquantifiable,".

1990—Pub. L. 101–640 inserted "(including preservation and enhancement of the environment)" after "environment".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rural Project Evaluation and Selection Criteria

Pub. L. 102–580, title II, §214, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4831, directed Comptroller General, not later than 18 months after Oct. 31, 1992, to report to Congress with specific legislative and other recommendations on improving the equitable distribution of water resources development projects in rural areas, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–316, title I, §117, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3835.
(November 29, 1943.)

#### Milton Meiselman, an Infant, by Fanny Meiselman, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
|  | **Find out what gear these CNET				student readers can't study without.**					 **See the student picks** |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 210.72 Confidentiality of information.

Confidential information (as defined in § 201.6(a) of this chapter) that is provided to the Commission pursuant to exclusion order, cease and desist order, or consent order will be received by the Commission in confidence. Requests for confidential treatment shall comply with § 201.6 of this chapter. The restrictions on disclosure and the procedures for handling such information (which are set out in §§ 210.5 and 210.39) shall apply and, in a proceeding under § 210.75 or § 210.76, the Commission or the presiding administrative law judge may, upon motion or sua sponte, issue or continue appropriate protective orders.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JAMES PATTERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 00-4727

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL JAMES PATTERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-99-43, CR-99-75)

Submitted: May 28, 2002 Decided: July 8, 2002
2

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

D. Rodney Kight, Jr., KIGHT LAW OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Thomas Richard Ascik, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Patterson was notified by counsel of his right to file a

supplemental brief raising issues he deemed significant and has

elected not to do so.

3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael James Patterson brings

a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during his plea and

sentencing on one count of unlawful possession of a firearm in

violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000) and one count of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine

base in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (West 1999 &

Supp. 2001). Patterson’s appellate counsel has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting

there are no meritorious issues for appeal but addressing whether

Patterson’s counsel conclusively provided ineffective assistance of

counsel at either Patterson’s plea hearings or sentencing hearing

and whether any other meritorious claims exist.* We have thoroughly

reviewed the record and find no evidence on the face of the record

that Patterson’s attorney provided ineffective assistance of

counsel at either his plea hearing or at sentencing.

We have examined the entire record in this case in accordance

with the requirements of Anders and find no meritorious issues for

appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in

writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United

States for further review. If the client requests that a petition
4

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be

frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a

copy thereof was served on the client. Finally, we dispense with

oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Annual Reports to Congress

Home

Each year, the Department of Defense (DoD) submits an annual report to Congress (ARC) on its Defense Environmental Programs (DEP). The Report describes the Department’s accomplishments during the past year in its restoration, conservation, compliance, and pollution prevention programs by addressing plans and funding needs for protecting human health, sustaining the resources DoD holds in the public trust, meeting its environmental requirements, and supporting the military mission.

The Report also details DoD’s efforts for reinforcing environmental programs to ensure the safe and effective use, protection, restoration, and preservation of the Department’s natural and cultural assets; and examines DoD’s environmental restoration activities at sites on its active and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) installations and former properties.

Prior to FY2004, DoD submitted separate reports for the Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and the Environmental Quality (EQ) Programs, which can be accessed from FY1995 through FY2003.

To obtain additional data queries, search installation-level data, and generate customized reports for the latest FY report, please visit: Search the ARC

## Search the ARC

Generate a Report

Installation Search

## Recent Reports

DEP ARC FY 2023

DEP ARC FY 2022

DEP ARC FY 2020

DEP ARC FY 2019

DEP ARC FY 2018

DEP ARC FY 2017

DEP ARC FY 2016

DEP ARC FY 2015

Previous Years

Last Page Update: February 6, 2024

DoD Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Network and Information Exchange (DENIX)

Contact Help Desk
                              -   
                              -   

                            - DENIX FAQs
                            - External Link Disclaimer
                            - Privacy/Security
                            - Accessibility/Section 508

This is an official United States Government System for authorized, unclassified use only.

Do not discuss, enter, transfer, process, or transmit classified/sensitive national security information of greater sensitivity than this system is authorized.
### §701u. International engineering or scientific conferences; attendance

The Secretary of the Army is authorized to allot from any appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for flood control or rivers and harbors, funds for payment of expenses of representatives of the Corps of Engineers engaged on flood control and river and harbor work to international engineering or scientific conferences to be held outside the United States: Provided, That not more than ten representatives of the Corps of Engineers shall attend any one conference.

(May 17, 1950, ch. 188, title II, §211, 64 Stat. 183; Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §222, Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3697.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–303 substituted "outside the United States" for "outside the continental limits of the United States" and struck out before period at end ": And provided further, That not more than $25,000 shall be allotted during any one fiscal year for this purpose".
### §4281. Strategy for improving post-consumer materials management and water management

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after December 18, 2020, the EPA Administrator shall, in consultation with stakeholders, develop a strategy to improve post-consumer materials management and infrastructure for the purpose of reducing plastic waste and other post-consumer materials in waterways and oceans.

#### (b) Release

On development of the strategy under subsection (a), the EPA Administrator shall—

(1) distribute the strategy to States; and

(2) make the strategy publicly available, including for use by—

(A) for-profit private entities involved in post-consumer materials management; and

(B) other nongovernmental entities.

(Pub. L. 116–224, title III, §301, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1092.)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.57

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

         This Termination Agreement (this "Agreement") is executed 27 November,
2003 between the following two parties.

PARTY A:          Shanghai Linktone Consulting Co., Ltd.
ADDRESS:          F6, Ganglu Square , No.18, Xizang Road, Shanghai

PARTY B:          Du Minsheng
ADDRESS:          Room 601, No. 10, Lane 288, Macao Road, Shanghai


         1. WHEREAS, Party A and Party B executed the loan agreement (the "the
Loan Agreement") in April 28th, 2003.

         2.WHEREAS, Party A and Party B intent to terminate the the Loan
Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, both parties agree as follows:

1.       Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Loan Agreement and the the
         Loan Agreement shall terminate automatically upon this Agreement coming
         into effect.

2.       Rights and obligations of Party A and Party B under the Loan Agreement
         shall terminate upon the termination of the Loan Agreement.

3.       This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of execution.

4.       This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of People's Republic of
         China.

5.       This Agreement is executed by Chinese and English in duplicate, and in
         case of confliction, the Chinese version shall prevail.

PARTY A: SHANGHAI LINKTONE CONSULTING CO., LTD.

Representative: /s/ Jun Wu

PARTY B: /s/ Du Minsheng

                                       1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 20

- 00072

- CV

A. R., Appellant

v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 18

- 003020 , THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIV INGSTON, JUDGE PRESI DING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM Appellant A. R. filed her notice of appeal on January 27, 2020 . The appellate record was complete March 4, 2020 , making appellant’s brief due March 24, 2020

. To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed. The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals from suits for termination of p arental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule requires greater compliance with briefing deadlines. Therefore, we order Robert Galvin to file appellant’s brief no later than April 10,
2020 . If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why he should
not be held in contempt of court.
It is ordered on March 26, 2020

.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker an d Triana
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),  each
of the undersigned officers of Tag-It Pacific, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"),  do hereby  certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

         (1)      the  10-K  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 30, 2004                        /S/ COLIN DYNE
                                             --------------------------
                                                Colin Dyne
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Date:  March 30, 2004                        /S/ RONDA FERGUSON
                                             --------------------------
                                                Ronda Ferguson
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### Elisha Whitney et al., Receivers, etc., Appellants, *v.*Charles Ensign et al., Respondents.

(Agued November 13, 1878;

decided December 10, 1878.)

*George J. Sicard*for appellants.

*Sherman S. Rogers*for respondents.

*608Agree to reverse order of General Term and affirm jndg. ment of Special Term, on opinion of Smith, J., at Special Term.

All concur, except Miller, J., not voting.

Order reversed and judgment affirmed.
#### § 2638.502 Violations of criminal provisions related to government ethics.

Consistent with section 402(f) of the Act, nothing in this subpart authorizes the Director or any agency official to make a finding as to whether a provision of title 18, United States Code, or any other criminal law of the United States outside of such title, has been or is being violated. If the Director has information regarding the violation of a criminal law by an individual employee, the Director will notify an Inspector General or the Department of Justice.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 16 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 2
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 2003

                     Received; read the first time

                            January 10, 2003

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR FEDERAL JUSTICES AND 
              JUDGES.

    Pursuant to section 140 of Public Law 97-92, Justices and judges of 
the United States are authorized during fiscal year 2003 to receive a 
salary adjustment in accordance with section 461 of title 28, United 
States Code.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 8, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                         Calendar No. 2

108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 16

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize salary adjustments for Justices and judges of the United 
                      States for fiscal year 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 10, 2003

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### Charles P. Kimmey, Appellant, v. Yorkville Independent Hygeia Ice Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §2605. Enforcement

#### (a) General authority

The Secretary of Transportation shall enforce this chapter under section 89 1 of title 14. The Secretary may authorize other officers or employees of the United States Government to enforce this chapter under that section.

#### (b) Periodic examinations

The Secretary shall conduct periodic examinations of vessels operating under this chapter transporting municipal or commercial waste to determine that each of these vessels has a permit issued under section 2602 of this title.

#### (c) Refusal of clearance

The Secretary of the Treasury may refuse the clearance required by section 60105 of title 46, to any vessel subject to this chapter which does not have a permit required under section 2602 of this title.

#### (d) Denial of entry and detention

If a vessel does not comply with this chapter, the Secretary of Transportation may—

(1) deny entry to any place in the United States; and

(2) detain at the place in the United States from which it is about to depart.

#### (e) Persistent violators

The Administrator shall conduct an investigation of the owner or operator of a vessel or facility if the owner has 5 or more separate violations during a 6-month period.

(Pub. L. 100–688, title IV, §4105, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4157.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 89 of title 14, referred to in subsec. (a), was redesignated section 522 of title 14 by Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §105(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4200, and reference to section 89 of title 14 deemed to refer to such redesignated section, see section 123(b)(1) of Pub. L. 115–282, set out as a References to Sections of Title 14 as Redesignated by Pub. L. 115–282 note preceding section 101 of Title 14, Coast Guard.

#### Codification

In subsec. (c), "section 60105 of title 46" substituted for "section 4197 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (46 App. U.S.C. 91)" on authority of Pub. L. 109–304, §18(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1709, which Act enacted section 60105 of Title 46, Shipping.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Graham Toomey, Appellant, against Union Bag & Paper Corporation et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*1047All concur.