2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-30-2008 

# V e at ch v . Al leghe n y C ounty P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 07-3005

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " V e at ch v . Al le ghe n y C ounty " (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1102. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/1102NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 07- 3005

___________ R E G IS G . V E A T C H , a P e n n sy lv a n ia R e sid e n t an d ; M A R I L Y N S. V E A T C H , hi s w i fe, A p p e llan ts v. A L L E G H E N Y C O U N T Y B U R E A U O F C O R R E C T IO N S ; S E RV I CE E M P L OYE E S I NT E RN AT I ONAL UNI ON

___________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e W e ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C i vi l N o. 07- cv- 00140) D istri ct Ju d g e: T h e H o n o rab le T erren ce F . M cV erry

___________ Subm i t t ed U nderT hi r d C i r cui tL A R 34. 1( a)

M ay23, 2008 B efore: S M ITH , H A R D IM A N , and N Y G A A R D , C i rcui tJudg es.

( Fi l ed M ay30, 2008)2 ___________ OPI NI ON O F THE COURT

___________ N Y G A A R D , C i r cui tJ udge. A ft erhi s empl oym entw as t erm i nat ed form i s conduct , A ppel l antR egi s V eat ch s ued the A l l eghenyC ount yB ur eau of C or r ect i ons forvi ol at i ons of the Labor M anage m entR el at i ons A ct. H e al s o s ued hi s uni on, t he Servi ce Em pl oy ees I nt ernat i onal U n ion , fo r an all eg ed b rea ch o f it s d u tyo f f air repre sen tat ion . T h e D istri ct C o u rt di s m i s s ed hi s compl ai nt , det erm i ni ng t hati tl acke d j ur i s di ct i on beca us e nei t herA l l egheny C o u n ty n o r t h e S E IU a re “ e m p lo y e rs ” w ith in th e m e a n in g o f th e L M R A . B efor e the D i s t r i ctC our t , and then aga i n on appea l , V eat ch ar gues t hathe w as not a n e m p lo y e e o f

A lleg h e n yC o u n ty , b u t ra th e r o f th e C o u n tyJa il O v e rsig h t B o a rd . B o th p a rties c o n c e d e th a t th e A lleg h e n yC o u n tyjail is o p e ra ted a n d m a in tain e d b yth e C o u n ty J ai l O ver s i ghtB oar d. I n C rilly v . So u th e a ste rn P e n n sy lva n ia T ra n sp o rta tio n A u th o rity , 529 F. 2d 1355 ( 3d C i r . 1976) , w e hel d t hata tr ans por t at i on author i t yw as notan “em ploy er” for purposes of the L M R A becau se i tw as a poli t i cal subd i vis i on . W e al so held that em ploy ees w orki ng for t he au t ho ri t ycou l d n ot be con si dered “em ploy ees” w ith in th e m e a n in g o f

th e L M R A . T h e B o a rd h e re , li k e th e tra n sp o rta tio n a u th o rityin C rilly , is a c re a tu re o f

sta tu te a n d , the re f

o re , a p o lit ica l su b d iv isio n o f th e g o v e rn m e n t – e x e mp t i n g i tf

r o m th e LM RA. W e wi l l a f f i r m.