alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• Aerial Centrifugal Impeller Generation I (ACI Gen I)

• 11 Apr 2012: A CI Gen I proof of concept achieved • 15 Mar , 2013: A CI patent application submitted • Grandfather protections ensured under first to invent patent rules • Mohyi Labs is on the cusp of delivering ACI Generation II (ACI Gen II) bladeless technology that is capable of accomplishing a wide cross- section of missions within aerospace and sub - aquatic environments • In sub - aquatic environments, cavitation is alleviated • **No “rotating razor blades”** means **safer** operations, de risking personal injury and collateral damage threat 

## Mohyi Labs UAS Bladeless Concept

1 10/26/2015 ACI Gen II ACI Gen I Early Prototype

## Fully Assembled

## Bottom View **Assembled**
§ 300.503 Conditions for using private sector temporaries. An agency may enter into a contract or other procurement arrangement with a temporary help service firm for the brief or intermittent use of the skills of private sector temporaries, when required, and may call for those services, subject to these conditions: ( a ) One of the following short-term situations exists— ( 1 ) An employee is absent for a temporary period because of a personal need including emergency, accident, illness, parental or family responsibilities, or mandatory jury service, but not including vacations or other circumstances which are not shown to be compelling in the judgment of the agency, or
( 2 ) An agency must carry out work for a temporary period which cannot be delayed in the judgment of the agency because of a critical need.
( b ) The need cannot be met with current employees or through the direct appointment of temporary employees within the time available by the date, and for the duration of time, help is needed. At minimum, this should include an agency determination that there are no qualified candidates on the applicant supply file and on the reemployment priority list (both of which must provide preference for veterans), and no qualified disabled veterans with a compensable service-connected disability of 30 percent or more under 5 U.S.C. 3112, who are immediately available for temporary appointment of the duration required, and that employees cannot be reassigned or detailed without causing undue delay in their regular work. In instances where a need is foreseeable, as when approval of employee absence is requested well in advance, an agency may have sufficient time to follow the temporary appointment recruiting requirements, including veterans' preference found in 5 CFR part 316 to determine whether qualified candidates are available by the date needed and for the length of service required.
( c ) These services shall not be used: ( 1 ) In lieu of the regular recruitment and hiring procedures under the civil service laws for permanent appointment in the competitive civil service, or
( 2 ) To displace a Federal employee.
( 3 ) To circumvent controls on employment levels.
( 4 ) In lieu of appointing a surplus or displaced Federal employee as required by 5 CFR part 330, subpart F (Agency Career Transition Assistance Plan for Displaced Employees) and subpart G (Interagency Career Transition Assistance Plan for Displaced Employees.)
[54 FR 3766, Jan. 25, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 19510, May 2, 1996; 66 FR 66710, Dec. 27, 2001]
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, WU Yuxiang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 19, 2007 |  | /s/ WU Yuxiang
|                        |  | Name:          |  | WU Yuxiang             
|                        |  | Title:         |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-009 March 14, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH DOMINION ENERGY OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Dominion Energy officials on

Thursday, March 20, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

North Anna nuclear power plant near Mineral, Virginia.

The meeting will be held at 2:00 p.m. in the main auditorium of the North Anna Nuclear

Information Center at the plant site. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials

will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to Dominion Energy addresses plant safety performance during the

previous year and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, North

Anna operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a

level requiring no additional NRC inspection beyond normal baseline activities. The letter, which is

available from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/na_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will

conduct three non-baseline activities. One will be special inspection activities associated with North

Anna reactor vessel head replacements, one will be a review of the plant’s implementation of Interim

Compensatory Measures required by an NRC Security Order, dated February 25, 2002, and the third

will be routine inspections of activities associated with North Anna’s Independent Spent Fuel (Dry

Cask) Storage Installation.

 Current performance indicators for the two units at the North Anna plant are available at 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/NA1/na1_chart.html and 

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/NA2/na2_chart.html

###
**Exhibit 12.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Janice Lee, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of hanarotelecom incorporated (the“Company”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: June 29, 2006          /s/ Janice Lee Janice Lee
### Part J—Services, Education, Protection and Justice for Young Victims of Violence
#### § 293.406 Disclosure of records.

Disclosure as used here means the furnishing of the record to someone other than the individual to whom the record pertains, his/her designated representative, or to an agency official who needs the information in the performance of official duties. Disclosure of information from this file system shall be made only as permitted by the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(b)) and, with regard to the routine use provisions of that section, only under a routine use published by the Office for the system of records covering these records. However, to the extent that this system contains the data identified as being available to the public in § 293.311, for most Federal employees and under the same restrictions listed in that section, that information shall also be made available to the public from this system.
Exhibit 23.1
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
The Board of Directors
eFunds Corporation:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements filedon Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-51568, 333-51564, 333-51536, and 333-44830) ofeFunds Corporation of our report dated March 2, 2004, relating to theconsolidated balance sheet of eFunds Corporation and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for the year thenended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-Kof eFunds Corporation.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-030 February 23, 2006

NRC PROPOSES CLARIFICATIONS TO NEW REACTOR LICENSING PROCESS,

PLANS MARCH 14 PUBLIC MEETING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing revisions to its regulations dealing with the

licensing and approval of new nuclear power plants, and will hold a workshop March 14 in Rockville,

Md., to discuss the proposal.

The requirements are outlined in a proposed rule to clarify the interrelationships of NRC reactor

licensing regulations. This includes how the NRC’s regulations covering existing nuclear reactors

apply to licensing processes under Part 52 of the Code of Federal Regulations, such as Early Site

Permits (ESP), Standard Design Certifications and Combined Licenses. Since the agency adopted 

Part 52 in 1989, reviews of its provisions have revealed a need for clarification on the application of

Part 50's general provisions to Part 52. The proposed rule would supersede revisions proposed in July

2003, and would incorporate lessons learned during review of the first three ESP applications.

The workshop will be held March 14 in the auditorium of Two White Flint North, 11545

Rockville Pike, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting will provide additional information on the basis for

the proposed changes and give interested parties an opportunity to ask questions about the proposed

rule. 

For more information on the proposed rule, contact NRC staff members Nanette Gilles

(telephone 301-415-1180, e-mail nvg@nrc.gov ) or Jerry Wilson (telephone 301-415-3145, e-mail

jnw@nrc.gov ). To pre-register or submit written questions for the workshop, contact Ms. Gilles. To

help ensure complete and accurate responses, written questions should be submitted by March 10.

Comments on the changes will be accepted for 75 days following publication of the proposed

rule in the Federal Register, expected shortly. Comments should include the identification number

RIN 3150 AG-24 in the header or subject line. Comments may be mailed to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. 

They may be e-mailed to: SECY@nrc.gov , and may be submitted via the NRC’s rulemaking Web site

at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov , or through the Federal Rulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov . 

Comments may also be faxed to the Secretary at 301-415-1101, or hand-delivered to 11555 Rockville

Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on federal workdays.

###
#### Isadore Schoenfeld, Respondent, *v.*Modern Silver Linen Supply Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

First Department,

November 13, 1951.

*50
      *Myron P. Gordon*of counsel *(Arthur A. Lift*with him on the brief; *Jacoh Landau,*attorney), for appellants.

*Louis Spivach*of counsel (S. *0. Menihoff*with him on the brief; *Menihoff S Spivach,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

When a document which prime facie defeats the plaintiff’s cause of action, is produced on a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint, it is incumbent upon plaintiff to show by affidavit or other proof such facts sufficient to entitle him to a trial of the action (Bules-Civ. Prac., rule 113).

In support of their motion, defendants submitted a general release executed by plaintiff at the time of his discharge which runs to defendants, their affiliated corporations and principal stockholders. Plaintiff has failed to impugn the validity of this release; or to raise a question of fact as to its validity or purpose. The bare statement that the release was a “ mere formality ” is clearly insufficient.

Moreover, plaintiff’s complaint is that defendants breached an alleged oral agreement of employment made on February 7, 1947. The documentary- proof presented by defendant to assail that claim consists of a written contract by the parties made on July 24, 1947. This instrument is wholly inconsistent with the oral agreement. In the circumstances, - the prior oral contract must be deemed to have "been superseded by the writing *(Johnson*v. *Cheney Bros.,*277 App. Div. 656, [Van Voorhis, J.]).

The order should be reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion for summary judgment should be granted, and judgment, directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs to defendants.

*51.""¡"Dope, J. P.,Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JL, concur. .."!

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants and the motion granted, and judgment is directed to be entered dismissing the complaint herein, with costs.
§ 330.708 ICTAP eligibility period. ( a ) ICTAP eligibility begins on the date the employee or former employee meets the definition of *displaced* in § 330.702.
( b ) ICTAP eligibility ends 1 year from the date of: ( 1 ) Separation by RIF under part 351 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Removal by the agency under part 752 of this chapter for declining a directed geographic relocation outside the local commuting area (e.g., a directed reassignment or a change in duty station);
( 3 ) Agency certification that it cannot place the employee under part 353 of this chapter; or
( 4 ) OPM notification that an employee's disability annuity has been, or will be, terminated.
( c ) ICTAP eligibility ends 2 years after RIF separation if eligible under subpart D of this part.
( d ) ICTAP eligibility also ends on the date the eligible: ( 1 ) Receives a notice rescinding, canceling, or modifying the notice which established ICTAP eligibility so that the employee no longer meets the definition of *displaced* in § 330.702;
( 2 ) Separates from the agency for any reason before the RIF or removal effective date; or
( 3 ) Is appointed to a career, career-conditional, or excepted appointment without time limit in any agency at any grade or pay level.
( e ) OPM may extend the eligibility period when an ICTAP eligible does not receive a full 1 year (or 2 years under subpart D of this part) of eligibility, for example, because of administrative or procedural error.
( f ) ICTAP eligibility for a former Military Reserve Technician or National Guard Technician described in § 330.702 ends when the Technician no longer receives the special disability retirement annuity under 5 U.S.C. 8337(h) or 8456.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1506

_____________________________
H ANNAH G ASTON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Du val County

. Linda McCallum , Judge

. January 10, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### § 145.35 United States products returned.

Products of the United States returned after having been exported, which have not been advanced in value or improved in condition while abroad, may be passed free of duty without issuing an entry and without the declarations provided for in § 10.1(a) of this chapter, provided the shipment is valued at not over $2,500 and the port director is satisfied that the merchandise is free of duty under subheading 9801.00.10, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).

[T.D. 73-135, 38 FR 13369, May 21, 1973, as amended by T.D. 85-123, 50 FR 29955, July 23, 1985; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51263, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 89-82, 54 FR 36026, Aug. 31, 1989; T.D. 94-47, 59 FR 25570, May 17, 1994; T.D. 98-28, 63 FR 16417, Apr. 3, 1998; CBP Dec. 12-19, 77 FR 72721, Dec. 6, 2012]
#### § 1315.8 Rebates.

Agencies shall determine governmentwide commercial purchase card payment dates based on an analysis of the total costs and total benefits to the Federal government as a whole, unless specified in a contract. When calculating costs and benefits, agencies are expected to include the cost to the government of paying early. This cost is the interest the government would have earned, at the Current Value of Funds rate, for each day that payment was not made. Agencies may factor in benefits gained from paying early due to, for example, streamlining the payment process or other efficiencies. A rebate formula is provided in § 1315.17 and at the Prompt Payment website at *www.fms.treas.gov/prompt/index.html.*
```

[House Document 110-135]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

110th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 110-135

 
     CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THEPRESIDENTOFTHEUNITEDSTATES

                              transmitting

 CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT OF 22 ACCELEROMETERS FOR INCORPORATION 
INTO RAILWAY GEOMETRY MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND ONE 20-INCH FLUID ENERGY 
 MILL FOR PRODUCTION OF NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO 
THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY, NOR WILL IT MEASURABLY IMPROVE 
 THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF 
             CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512

    July 23, 2008.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with the provisions of section 1512 of the 
Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I hereby certify that the 
export of 22 accelerometers for incorporation into railway 
geometry measurement systems and one 20-inch fluid energy mill 
for production of nutritional supplements is not detrimental to 
the United States space launch industry, and that the material 
and equipment, including any indirect technical benefit that 
could be derived from such exports, will not measurably improve 
the missile or space launch capabilities of the People's 
Republic of China.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, July 22, 2008.

                                  

```
#### § 2604.104 Preservation of records.

OGE will preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this part, as well as copies of all responsive records, until disposition or destruction is authorized by title 44 of the United States Code or the National Archives and Records Administration's General Records Schedule. Records will not be disposed of while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit.