alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2


                        ENDURANCE SPECIALTY HOLDINGS LTD.
                        PAR VALUE OF SHARES US$1.00 EACH




     THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT               OF                            IS THE
REGISTERED HOLDER OF               FULLY PAID CLASS A SHARES OF PAR VALUE OF
US$1.00 EACH IN THE ABOVE-NAMED COMPANY, SUBJECT TO THE MEMORANDUM OF
ASSOCIATION AND BYE-LAWS THEREOF.


     GIVEN UNDER THE COMMON SEAL OF THE COMPANY THIS DAY OF         , 200 .





                                                     .................  DIRECTOR



                                                     ................. SECRETARY


<PAGE>
"THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED
UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE "ACT"), OR ANY
UNITED STATES STATE OR FOREIGN SECURITIES LAW. SUCH SECURITIES MAY NOT BE
TRANSFERRED, RESOLD OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF UNLESS SUCH TRANSFER, RESALE OR
DISPOSITION IS MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE UNITED STATES
STATE OR FOREIGN SECURITIES LAWS. IN ADDITION, THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY
THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER AND OTHER TERMS
AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE BYE-LAWS OF ENDURANCE SPECIALTY HOLDINGS LTD.
("ENDURANCE") AND THE SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT DATED AS OF JULY 22, 2002, AS THEY
MAY BE AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, WHICH ARE AVAILABLE FOR EXAMINATION BY
HOLDERS OF THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AT THE REGISTERED
OFFICE OF ENDURANCE."
**Exhibit 10(j)**

**AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE**

**TO THE UNITED RENTALS, INC.**

**ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN,**

**AS AMENDED AND RESTATED,**

**EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 16, 2008**

WHEREAS, United Rentals, Inc. (the “Company”) has established the United Rentals, Inc. Annual Incentive Compensation Plan, asamended and restated, effective December 16, 2008 (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Companyhas the authority under Section 9.2 of the Plan to amend the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan toclarify certain payment terms for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and to correct certain provisions in accordance with IRS Notice 2010-6. 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment set forth in the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective on and afterJanuary 1, 2005: 

1. The second sentence of Section 7.2 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

“Any election to defer shall be made prior to the end of the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which thePerformance Period begins; provided that, to the extent permitted under Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-2(a)(7), for the year in which an executive of the Company first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan, such election to defer must bemade by a Participant not later than 30 days following the date he or she is selected by the Committee to participate in the Plan.” 

2. Section 8.3 of the Plan is hereby amended to add the following phrase to the end thereof: 

“or, if earlier, the date of the Participant’s death.” 

3. ThePlan is hereby amended by adding a new Section 10.11 to read as follows: 

“If for any reason, such as imprecision indrafting, any provision of the Plan does not accurately reflect its intended establishment of an exemption from (or compliance with) Code Section 409A, as demonstrated by consistent interpretations or other evidence of intent, such provisionshall be considered ambiguous as to its exemption from (or compliance with) Code Section 409A and shall be interpreted by the Committee in a manner consistent with such intent. To the extent that the right to any payment under the Plan providesfor deferred 

compensation within the meaning of Code Section 409A that is not exempt from Code Section 409A as a short-term deferral (or otherwise), a termination of employment shall not be deemedto have occurred for purposes of any provision of the Plan providing for any payment upon or following a termination of employment unless such termination is also a “separation from service” within the meaning of Code Section 409Aand, for purposes of any such provision, references to a “termination,” “termination of employment,” or like terms shall mean “separation from service.” Each payment made under the Plan shall be designated as a“separate payment” within the meaning of Code Section 409A.” 

4. Except as hereinabove amended andmodified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Maternity
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Judd P. Tirnauer, Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/    JUDD P. TIRNAUER                                         
|Judd P. Tirnauer Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer

May 8, 2009
## NUMBER 13

- 2 1

- 00 228

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ DAVID GREG GONZALES , A ppellant ,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 1 9 7 th District Court of Willacy County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justice s Benavides, Longoria , and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Upon review of the documents before the Court, it appears there is no final
appealable order. On July 27 , 2021
, the clerk of the court notified appellant of this defect
and provided t en days to correct. Appellant has neither corrected the defect nor
responded to the court’s notice

.2

Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.
State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State
, 915 S.W.2d
160, 161 (Tex. App.

– Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include:
(1) certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State
, 942 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to
reduce bond, T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 31.1 ; McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals

from the denial of h abeas corpus relief, Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

-

- Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161.

Our review of the documents before the Court shows that appellant’s case is still
pending in the trial court and it does not reveal any appealable orders entered by the trial
court within thirty days before the filing of appellant's notice of appeal. Moreover,

the notice of appeal cannot be construed as premature because it was filed before the

trial court has made a finding of guilt or has received a jury verdict. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 27.1(b).
The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal, is of the
opinion that there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the

matters herein. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed o n the 16th day of Septe m be r , 202 1

.
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     The undersigned, who is the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer of Community First Bancorporation, hereby certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge,  the accompanying Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

March 30, 2007

                             s/Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
### §§461 to 464. Repealed. Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 854, §1636, 31 Stat. 1434

Section 461, act May 19, 1896, ch. 208, §1, 29 Stat. 126, prohibited deposit of ballast, dirt, ashes or oyster shells into Potomac River except for purpose of making a wharf and then only after approval.

Section 462, act May 19, 1896, ch. 208, §2, 29 Stat. 127, prohibited deposit of dead fish, dead animals, fruits, vegetables, ice, snow, filth or trash of any kind into Potomac River.

Section 463, act May 19, 1896, ch. 208, §3, 29 Stat. 127, related to penalties.

Section 464, act May 19, 1896, ch. 208, §4, 29 Stat. 127, provided that none of these provisions be construed to interfere with any work or improvements in harbor or river area.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-05-006 February 11, 2005

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has promoted Greg Warnick to senior resident

inspector at the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, located near Wintersburg, Ariz.

“Greg Warnick’s training and experience will aid the NRC in its oversight of the licensee

as part of our effort to ensure that the Palo Verde nuclear plant operates in a manner that

continues to protect public health and safety,” said NRC Region IV Administrator Bruce S.

Mallett.

Warnick, who has been a resident inspector at Palo Verde since 2000, will work with 

Pablo Benvenuto and Jim Melfi, both resident inspectors at the plant.

Warnick first joined the NRC in 1997 as a project engineer in the NRC’s Region II office

in Atlanta, Ga. In 1998, he was assigned as resident inspector at the St. Lucie nuclear plant in St.

Lucie, Fla., and transferred to Region IV in 2000.

Prior to joining the NRC, Warnick was employed as a nuclear plant engineer at 

Lockheed Martin - Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Inc. He graduated from Brigham Young

University with a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering in 1993.

Each of the country’s commercial nuclear plants has resident inspectors who serve as the

agency’s eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections, monitoring significant work

projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The resident inspectors at Palo Verde

can be reached at (623) 386-3638.

###
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-04-0084 - Status of the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program

Accession Number: ML041330474

Date Released: Tuesday, June 1, 2004

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML041330430 - SECY-04-0084 - Status of the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Program (10 page(s), 5/17/2004)
    - ML033520567 - SRM-M031209B - Briefing on the Equal Employment Opportunity Program. (2 page(s), 12/18/2003)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### In the Matter of the Application of Anthony McQuade, Respondent, for a Writ of Mandamus against James M. Morrow and Others, the Examining Board of Plumbers of the City of New York, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—STEERING AND SAILING RULES
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending December 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.



/s/ David Salzman
-------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman American
Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant
February 13, 2004
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-064 May 10, 2006

NRC FINDS NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 

FROM PROPOSED CENTRIFUGE ENRICHMENT PLANT IN OHIO

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final environmental impact statement

on a proposed gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in Piketon, Ohio, concluding there would be

small to moderate impacts on traffic, air pollution and the local economy, but that anticipated benefits

of the facility would outweigh any adverse effects.

USEC Inc. submitted its application to construct and operate the American Centrifuge Plant in

August 2004. The plant would be located on land leased from the U.S. Department of Energy at DOE’s

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant site in Piketon.

The environmental impact statement categorizes potential impacts of the plant in three ways:

“Small” impacts are not detectable or are so minor that they would neither destabilize nor noticeably

alter the environment; “Moderate” impacts are sufficient to noticeably alter but not destabilize a

resource; while “Large” impacts are clearly noticeable and sufficient to destabilize a resource.

The environmental study describes small-to-moderate socioeconomic impacts of the proposed

plant. Specifically, an estimated 3,362 full-time jobs would be created in the area from 2006 to 2010 as

a result of plant construction. During operation from 2010 to 2040, about 1,500 jobs would be created

in the Piketon area. The study also notes moderate socioeconomic impacts to Paducah, Ky., where

USEC is expected to terminate operations at its gaseous diffusion enrichment plant once the Piketon

centrifuge plant begins production.

The study also notes small-to-moderate impacts on traffic along the two main roads in the

Piketon area, especially during construction of the centrifuge plant. Air quality may also be affected by

dust and other particulate matter kicked up in an area that already sees similar impacts from agriculture.

The study also examines impacts on geology, water resources, cultural resources, noise and public

occupational health and safety, among others. The staff determined that the environmental impacts of

the proposed facility in all areas other than those specifically discussed above would be small.

The NRC published a draft environmental impact statement in September, and held a public

meeting in Piketon to receive public comments. The final report addresses the nearly 300 individual

comments the NRC staff identified from letters, facsimile transmittals and e-mails received from

approximately 15 individuals, and from oral comments given by 17 individuals.
The final environmental impact statement is available for public viewing on the NRC’s Web

site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1834/ .

###
### §59aa. Nonnavigability of Wisconsin River

The portion of the Wisconsin River above the hydroelectric dam at Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin, is hereby declared to be a nonnavigable waterway of the United States for purposes of title 46, including but not limited to the provisions of such title relating to vessel inspection and vessel licensure, and the other maritime laws of the United States.

(Pub. L. 101–595, title III, §318, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2988.)
#### Television Credit Corporation, Appellant, v. International Television Corporation, Respondent. (Actions Nos. 1 and 2.)

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00407-CV

CASTINE MCILHARGEY AND JODY MCINTYRE, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF A+PRO RECOVERY AND TOWING, LLC

v.

ERIK M. HAGER, JASON RIOS, EDUARDO PENA, JOANNA PENA,

AND SOUTH PADRE TOWING AND RECOVERY, LLC

On Appeal from the

107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCL-03294-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellees.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 18, 2021
EXHIBIT 7

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 83-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2021 Page 1 of 2
http://cubancigarsculturelifestyle.blogspot.com/2013/01/, 

Case 1:20-cv-23287-DPG Document 83-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/23/2021 Page 2 of 2
### §282e. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, and for each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter and to increase the efficiency of the Office and the quality of the services which it provides.

(Pub. L. 91–510, title V, §526, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1203.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Notice of Closed Meeting

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

    Name of Committee: Safety and Occupational Health Study Section 
(SOHSS); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH).
    Date: February 20-21, 2019.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., EST.
    Place: Embassy Suites, 1900 Diagonal Road, Alexandria, VA 22314.
    Agenda: The meeting will convene to address matters related to 
the conduct of Study Section business and for the study section to 
consider safety and occupational health-related grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Nina Turner, Ph.D., Scienitific 
Review Officer, NIOSH, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26506, 
(304) 285-5976; [email protected].

    The Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal 
Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other 
committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

Sherri Berger,
Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2018-27721 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT,

Appellant,

v.

 PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS, 

Appellee.

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEE’S BRIEF

Appellee, the Public Utility Commission of Texas, files this unopposed

motion to extend the time for filing appellee’s brief for fourteen days to

October 12, 2015. 

1. The Appellee’s brief is due on September 28, 2015.

2. Appellee requests a fourteen-day extension to October 12, 2015. 

3. The press of other business prevents counsel for Appellee from

preparing a brief that will be helpful to the Court by the current deadline. 

Counsel attended and presented at UT’s Advanced Texas Administrative

Law Seminar August 31 and September 1, she has a long-planned and paidfor vacation from September 9–15, 2015, and has oral argument in this

Court in Entergy Texas, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission, No. 03-14-

00735-CV on September 23, 2015. Thus, she will not be able to

NO. 03-15-00386-CV

ACCEPTED

03-15-00386-CV

6790344

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/3/2015 4:01:39 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/3/2015 4:01:39 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
2

substantially work on this brief until after the September 23, 2015 oral

argument.

4. This is the first request Appellee has made for an extension of

time to file appellee’s brief. 

5. Counsel for Harris County Hospital District has been contacted

and does not oppose this motion for extension of time to file appellees’

brief.

Respectfully submitted,

KEN PAXTON

Attorney General of Texas

CHARLES E. ROY

First Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. DAVIS

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation

JON NIERMANN

Division Chief

Environmental Protection Division

/s/ Elizabeth R. B. Sterling 

Elizabeth R. B. Sterling

Assistant Attorney General 

Texas State Bar No. 19171100
3

Environmental Protection Division

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548, MC-066

Austin, Texas 78711-2548

512.463.2012

512.457-4616 FAX

Elizabeth.Sterling@texasattorneygeneral.gov 

COUNSEL FOR PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF

TEXAS

Certificate of Conference

I have contacted counsel for Harris County Hospital District, the only

other party in this case. Appellant District does not oppose the motion. 

/s/ Elizabeth R. B. Sterling

Elizabeth R. B. Sterling
4

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this the 3rd day of September 2015, a true and

correct copy of the foregoing document was served on the following counsel

electronically, through an electronic filing service, with a copy by email:

Bruce S. Powers

Harris County Assistant County Attorney

1019 Congress, 15th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 274-5144 (telephone)

(713) 755-8924 (facsimile)

bruce.powers@cao.hctx.net

ATTORNEYS FOR HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT

/s/ Elizabeth R. B. Sterling 

Elizabeth R. B. Sterling