alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Daniel S. Woolley, etc.

Motion for resettlement denied. We see no reason to interfere with the discretion of the surrogate in refusing to make the costs of this accounting payable out of the estate. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
  
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of American Bio Medica Corporation (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Stefan
        Parker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  /s/
                Stefan
                ParkerStefan Parker
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                Principal
                  Financial Officer and
                Executive
                  Vice President, Finance
                
                May
                  15, 2008
  17
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.1    
  


 
 

CONSULTING AGREEMENT    
  


        This Consulting Agreement dated January 6, 2003 ("Agreement") is by and between, ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION HOLDING CORPORATION d/b/a CHROME ENERGY
CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation ("Company") and THOMAS C. PRITCHARD, an individual ("Consultant"). 


W I T N E S S E T H: 


        WHEREAS,
Consultant desires to provide certain consulting services to the Company; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company and Consultant desire to set forth in writing the terms and conditions of their agreement; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants, agreements, and considerations herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 


        1.    Engagement.    Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the Company hereby affirms the engagement
of Consultant, as an independent contractor, to provide general legal services. 



        2.    Compensation.    For legal services performed by Consultant for the Company, the Company will issue to
Consultant 286,200 shares of common stock of the Company pursuant to a S-8 Registration Statement. 


        3.    Status Reports.    At the Company's written request, Consultant shall prepare and submit to the Company a
written status report describing the status of any sales of the Company Common Stock sold hereby. 



        4.    Term.    The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date herein and shall continue in full force and
effect for a period of six months. 


        5.    Miscellaneous.    



        (a)  Assignment. All of the terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. This Agreement shall not be assigned or transferred by either party, nor shall any interest
herein be assigned, transferred, pledged or hypothecated by either party without the prior written consent of the other party. 


        (b)  Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Texas. 


        (c)  Entire Agreement, Amendments and Waivers. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties hereto and
expressly supersedes all prior and contemporaneous understandings and commitments, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof. No variations, modifications, changes or
extensions of this Agreement or any other terms hereof shall be binding upon any party hereto unless set forth in a document duly executed by such party or an authorized agent or such party. 




        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above. 



	 	 	ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION HOLDING COPRORATION
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  CHUDE MBA      
 Chude Mba, President
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	 	 	THOMAS C. PRITCHARD
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  THOMAS C. PRITCHARD      
 Thomas C. Pritchard











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.1


CONSULTING AGREEMENT
§ 1653.33 Qualifying criminal restitution order. ( a ) The TSP record keeper will only honor the terms of a criminal restitution order that is qualifying under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A criminal restitution order must meet each of the following requirements to be considered qualifying: ( 1 ) The restitution must be ordered in the sentencing of the participant as required by 18 U.S.C. 3663A and 18 U.S.C. 3664.
( 2 ) The criminal restitution order must require the participant to pay a stated dollar amount as restitution.
( 3 ) The criminal restitution order must be accompanied by an enforcement letter that states the restitution is ordered under 18 U.S.C. 3663A. The enforcement letter must expressly refer to the “Thrift Savings Plan” or describe the TSP in such a way that it cannot be confused with other Federal Government retirement benefits or non-Federal retirement benefits.
( c ) The following orders will not be considered qualifying: ( 1 ) A criminal restitution order relating to a TSP account with a zero dollar account balance;
( 2 ) A criminal restitution order relating to a TSP account that contains only nonvested money, unless the money will become vested within 30 days of the date the TSP record keeper receives the order if the participant were to remain in Government service;
( 3 ) A criminal restitution order accompanied by an enforcement letter that requires the TSP to make a payment in the future;
( 4 ) A forfeiture order related to a monetary garnishment of funds;
( 5 ) A criminal restitution order accompanied by an enforcement letter that requires TSP to make a series of payments;
( 6 ) A criminal restitution order accompanied by an enforcement letter that designates the specific TSP core fund, source of contributions, or balance from which the payment or portions of the payment shall be made.
[79 FR 53604, Sept. 10, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 52605, Sept. 1, 2015; 87 FR 31691, May 24, 2022]
### §453. Regulations for navigation of Ambrose Channel; exclusion of tows and sailing vessels

The Secretary of the Army is authorized to make such rules and regulations for the navigation of Ambrose Channel as he may deem necessary or expedient to insure its safe use in all kinds of weather, night and day, for all vessels under control and running under their own power, and to this end he may, in his discretion, forbid its use to tows of every description and to sailing vessels.

(Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 144, §1, 37 Stat. 803; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act June 29, 1888, ch. 496, 25 Stat. 209, which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Welding Society, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Welding Society, 
Inc. (``AWS'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the 
name and principal place of business of the standards development 
organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Welding Society, Inc., Miami, FL. The nature and scope of AWS's 
standards development activities are: The development, maintenance, and 
publishing of standards in the areas of Metric Practices, Definitions & 
Symbols, Filler Metals & Allied Products, Computerization of Welding 
Information, Instrumentation for Welding, Methods of Inspection, 
Welding Qualification, Mechanical Testing of Welds, Resistance Welding, 
Thermal Spray, Brazing & Soldering, Oxyfuel Gas Welding & Cutting, Arc 
Welding & Cutting, Friction Welding, High Energy Beam Welding/Cutting, 
Structural Welding, Piping & Tubing, Welding Iron Castings, Machinery & 
Equipment, Railroad Welding, Robotics & Automatic Welding, Aircraft & 
Aerospace, Food Processing Equipment, Welding in Marine Construction, 
Automotive Welding, Welding of Sheet Metal, Joining Plastics & 
Composites, Joining of Metals & Alloys, Personnel & Facilities 
Qualification and Safety & Health.
    Additional Information may be obtained from Andrew Davis, Managing 
Director of the Technical Services Division of the American Welding 
Society, (800) 443-9353.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24559 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. 05-143 October 21, 2005

NRC ISSUES SAFETY EVALUATION FOR

 GRAND GULF EARLY SITE PERMIT APPLICATION

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has issued its final safety evaluation report (SER) for

an Early Site Permit (ESP) for the Grand Gulf site, about 25 miles south of Vicksburg, Miss.

The ESP process allows an applicant to address site-related issues, such as environmental

impacts, for possible future construction and operation of a nuclear power plant at the site. The Grand

Gulf application was filed Oct. 21, 2003, by System Energy Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of Entergy. If

approved, the permit would give the company up to 20 years to decide whether to build one or more

nuclear plants on the site and to file an application with the NRC for approval to begin construction.

Along with the SER, the staff must complete an Environmental Impact Statement, the Advisory

Committee on Reactor Safeguards must issue a report on the ESP application, and the Atomic Safety

and Licensing Board Panel must conclude its mandatory hearing on the matter before the Commission

can reach a final decision on issuing the permit. The NRC expects to finish this process late in 2006.

The 400-page SER contains the agency's review of the Grand Gulf ESP application. The NRC

staff reviewed information on:

– site seismology, geology, meteorology and hydrology;

– risks from potential accidents resulting from operation of a nuclear plant at the site;

– the site’s ability to support adequate physical security for a nuclear plant; and

– proposed major features of the emergency plan System Energy Resources would implement if

a reactor is eventually built at the site.

System Energy Resources will have 14 days to review the SER for proprietary information. 

The report will then be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. It will also be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-licensing/esp/grand-gulf.html . In addition, the Harriette Person

Memorial Public Library at 606 Main St. in Port Gibson, Miss., has agreed to make the SER available

for public inspection.

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1732 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1732

     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse 
                    Project, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2003

Mr. Carter (for himself and Mr. Edwards) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and 
     Facilities Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to 
participate in the Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse 
                    Project, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Short Title.--This section may be cited as the ``Williamson 
County Water Recycling Act of 2003''.
    (b) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Title XVI of Public Law 102-575; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1635 the following new 
section:

``SEC. 1636. WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, WATER RECYCLING AND REUSE 
              PROJECT.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Lower 
Colorado River Authority, Texas, is authorized to participate in the 
design, planning, and construction of permanent facilities to reclaim 
and reuse water in Williamson County, Texas.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the project 
described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation and maintenance of the project described in subsection 
(a).''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1635 the 
following:

``1636. Williamson County, Texas, Water Recycling and Reuse Project.''.
                                 <all>
```
From: Nowakowski, Matt

Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:06 AM

To: Hofmeister, Art

Subject: RE: TECO Polk Station GHG Application

Expires: Monday, September 16, 2013 12:00 AM

Art

The following is from the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s regs on the section 106 

process (36 CFR 800):

§ 800.3 Initiation of the section 106

process.

(a) Establish undertaking. The

agency official shall determine whether

the proposed Federal action is an

undertaking as defined in § 800.16(y)

and, if so, whether it is a type of activity

that has the potential to cause effects on

historic properties.

(1) No potential to cause effects. If

the undertaking is a type of activity that

does not have the potential to cause

effects on historic properties, assuming

such historic properties were present,

the agency official has no further

obligations under section 106 or this

part.

If you determine that there is no potential to cause effects because there are no historic 

properties on the site then you can move forward with no further requirements.

Matt

From: Hofmeister, Art 

Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:00 AM

To: Nowakowski, Matt

Subject: TECO Polk Station GHG Application

Here you go, Matt.

Thanks.

Art Hofmeister

Environment Engineer

Air Permits Section

EPA Region 4

(404) 562-9115
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-05-0029 - Use of the NRC Public Web Site for Dissemination of the NRC Enforcement Policy

Accession Number: ML050240417

Date Released: Tuesday, February 22, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML050240420 - SECY-05-0029 -  Use of the NRC Public Web Site for Dissemination of the NRC Enforcement Policy (4 page(s), 2/7/2005)
    - ML050250013 - SECY-05-0029Atch1 - FRN:  NUREG - 1600, NRC Enforcement Policy (4 page(s), 2/7/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
#### Henry E. Gropp v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, J J.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. 02-125 October 25, 2002

NRC ANNOUNCES EXTENSION OF OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON

LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES’ WHITE PAPERS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended the comment period on a series of “white

papers” presented to the NRC by Louisiana Energy Services (LES), which address licensing issues for a

gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility proposed to be located in Hartsville, Tennessee. The

comment period is extended to November 13 as a result of comments received at a recent public

information forum sponsored by Trousedale County, Tennessee. 

On October 2, NRC published an opportunity for public comment on six LES pre-application

policy issues, or “white papers:” 1) analysis of need for the facility; 2) environmental justice -

addressing disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of the proposed

facility on minority populations and low-income populations in the area; 3) financial qualifications; 4)

antitrust review; 5) foreign ownership; and 6) disposition of depleted uranium. A public meeting was

held on April 30 - prior to LES’ selection of the Hartsville site - to discuss these papers. Comments

were submitted by the Department of Energy (DOE) and the United States Enrichment Corporation

(USEC). 

The LES “white papers,” the NRC meeting summary, as well as the DOE and USEC comments

are available from the NRC Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). 

Help in using ADAMS is available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room staff by telephone at

301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov. Single copies of the documents are

also available for inspection and/or copying for a fee in the NRC Public Document Room, located at

11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

Interested persons are invited to submit comments by November 13, as announced in a Federal

Register notice today. Comments should be submitted to Michael Lesar, Chief, Rules and Directives

Branch, Division of Administration Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555. 
For further information, contact Timothy C. Johnson, Project Manager, Special Projects and 

Inspection Branch, Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety

and Safeguards (Mail Stop T-8A33), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555;

or by telephone at 301-415-7299; or by e-mail at TCJ@nrc.gov.

###
Exhibit 32.1/Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the amendment of the Quarterly Report of American
Bio Medica Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ending June 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2020 (the
“Report”), I, Melissa A. Waterhouse, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





/s/ Melissa A.
Waterhouse


Melissa
A. Waterhouse


Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Principal Financial
Officer


Principal
Accounting Officer





September 25,
2020
#### Sadie S. Schwartz, Respondent, v. Thomas E. Murray, as Receiver of Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Appellant.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
§ 2417.103 Definitions. The following definitions apply to this part: *Demand* means an order, subpoena, or other command of a court or other competent authority for the production, disclosure, or release of records, or for the appearance and testimony of an employee in a civil legal proceeding.
*Employee* means: ( 1 ) ( i ) Any current or former employee or member of the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel;
( ii ) Any other individual hired through contractual agreement by or on behalf of the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel, or who has performed or is performing services under such an agreement for the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel; and
( iii ) Any individual who served or is serving in any consulting or advisory capacity to the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel, whether formal or informal.
( 2 ) This definition does not include former FLRA employees who agree to testify about general matters, matters available to the public, or matters with which they had no specific involvement or responsibility during their employment with the FLRA.
*Legal proceeding* means any matter before a court of law, administrative board or tribunal, commission, administrative law judge, hearing officer, or other body that conducts a civil legal or administrative proceeding. Legal proceeding includes all phases of litigation.
*Records or official records and information* means all information in the custody and control of the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel, relating to information in the custody and control thereof, or acquired by an employee while in the performance of his or her official duties or because of his or her official status, while the individual was employed by or on behalf of the Authority, the General Counsel, or the Panel.
*Request* means any request, by whatever method, for the production of records and information or for testimony that has not been ordered by a court or other competent authority.
*Requester* means anyone who makes a request or demand under this part upon the FLRA.
*Testimony* means any written or oral statements, including depositions, answers to interrogatories, affidavits, declarations, interviews, and statements made by an individual in connection with a legal proceeding.
[81 FR 63362, Sept. 15, 2016]