alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-043 November 10, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC BEGINS SPECIAL INSPECTION OF ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS

IN SHUTDOWN AT D. C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has begun a special inspection of electrical problems at

the D. C. Cook Nuclear Power Station associated with the automatic shutdown of the plant’s Unit 2 on

Tuesday, Nov. 8. The two-reactor facility, located at Bridgman, Mich., is operated by American

Electric Power Co.

The Unit 2 reactor shut down automatically when the main generator failed. The main

generator is conventional power plant equipment which produces electricity for distribution to the

utility’s customers. The Unit 1 reactor was not affected and continued to operate at full power.

Following the Unit 2 shutdown, two separate circuit breakers failed to operate properly to

provide power to certain safety systems, and the utility is continuing to investigate those failures. The

plant has parallel safety systems, and all safety functions were available to the plant.

“The safety of the plant was not jeopardized,” said James Caldwell, NRC regional

administrator. “We’ve sent the special inspection team to better understand the circumstances

surrounding the electrical equipment failures and what corrective actions are needed.”

The three-person NRC team will monitor the utility’s investigation of the failures and the

resulting repairs. A report of the team’s inspection findings will be issued within 30 days of the close

of the inspection and will be available online in the NRC’s document library at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html.

###
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24505]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

National Communications System


Telecommunications Service Priority System Oversight Committee

AGENCY: National Communications System (NCS).

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The November 9, 2004 meeting of the Telecommunications Service 
Priority (TSP) System Oversight Committee has been cancelled and will 
be rescheduled at a later date to be determined.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Flint, Office of Priority 
Telecommunications, (703) 607-4932. Media or press must contact Mr. 
Steve Barrett at (703) 607-6211.

Peter M. Fonash,
Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-24505 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
  Barbeques Galore Limited:

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-46529, 333-52530 and 333-52532) on Form S-8 of Barbeques Galore
Limited of our report dated March 15, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Barbeques Galore Limited and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2002 and
2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations and other
comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years
ended January 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, which report appears in the January 31,
2002 Annual Report on Form 20-F of Barbeques Galore Limited and to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in the Form
20-F.

                                                        /s/  KPMG
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                          KPMG

May 1, 2002
Sydney, Australia
### §1731. Application of subchapter

This subchapter shall apply only with respect to oil and gas leases on Federal lands or Indian lands. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to apply to any lease on the Outer Continental Shelf.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title II, §201, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2457.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64585-64586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for Outer 
Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 197 in the Eastern Gulf 
of Mexico (GOM)

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

[[Page 64586]]


ACTION: Notice of availability of the proposed Notice of Sale for 
proposed Sale 197.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The MMS announces the availability of the proposed Notice of 
Sale for proposed Sale 197 in the Eastern GOM OCS. This notice is 
published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c) as a matter of information to 
the public. With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the 
Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, 
provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed 
notice. The proposed notice sets forth the proposed terms and 
conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty rates, and 
rentals.

DATES: Comments on the size, timing, or location of proposed Sale 197 
are due from the affected States within 60 days following their receipt 
of the proposed notice. The final Notice of Sale will be published in 
the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. 
Bid opening is currently scheduled for March 16, 2005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed Notice of Sale for Sale 197 and 
a ``Proposed Sale Notice Package'' containing information essential to 
potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, 
Gulf of Mexico Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park 
Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-
2519.

    Dated: November 1, 2004.
R.M. ``Johnnie'' Burton,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 04-24764 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1725

To change the deadline for income tax returns for calendar year taxpayers 

from the 15th of April to the first Monday in November. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland (for himself, Mr. GOODE, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, 

Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. TOOMEY, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. FLAKE, 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. GARRETT of New 

Jersey, Mr. PETRI, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. 

HEFLEY, Mr. KINGSTON, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

CHOCOLA, and Mr. HAYES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To change the deadline for income tax returns for calendar 

year taxpayers from the 15th of April to the first Monday in November.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1725 IH 

1 SECTION 1. DEADLINE FOR FILING INCOME TAX RETURNS 

2 FOR CALENDAR YEAR TAXPAYERS CHANGED 

3 FROM APRIL 15TH TO FIRST MONDAY OF NO4 VEMBER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6072 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to time for filing income tax 

7 returns) is amended in subsection (a) by striking ‘‘15th 

8 day of April’’ and inserting ‘‘first Monday in November’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2003.

Æ
### §426h. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2038(b), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1100

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, §5, as added Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §227(e)(1), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700; amended Pub. L. 106–53, title V, §581, Aug. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 375; Pub. L. 109–234, title II, §2305, June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 456; Pub. L. 110–161, div. C, title I, §113, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1944, related to national shoreline erosion control development and demonstration program.

A prior section 426h, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 960, §5, formerly §4, 60 Stat. 1057; July 28, 1956, ch. 768, 70 Stat. 703; renumbered §5, Oct. 12, 1996, Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §227(d)(1), 110 Stat. 3700, defined the word "shores" as used in sections 426e to 426h of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–303, title II, §227(e)(1), Oct. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 3700.
§ 1201.137 Covered actions; filing complaint; serving documents on parties. ( a ) *Covered actions.* The jurisdiction of the Board under 5 U.S.C. 7521 and this subpart with respect to actions against administrative law judges is limited to proposals by an agency to take any of the following actions against an administrative law judge: ( 1 ) Removal;
( 2 ) Suspension;
( 3 ) Reduction in grade;
( 4 ) Reduction in pay; and
( 5 ) Furlough of 30 days or less.
( b ) *Place of filing.* To initiate an action against an administrative law judge under this subpart, an agency must file a complaint with the Clerk of the Board.
( c ) *Initial filing and service.* The agency must file a copy of the complaint, together with numbered and tabbed exhibits or attachments, if any, and a certificate of service listing each party or the party's representative. The certificate of service must show the last known address, telephone number, and facsimile number of each party or representative. The agency must serve a copy of the complaint on each party and the party's representative, as shown on the certificate of service.
( d ) *Subsequent filings and service.* Each party must serve on every other party or the party's representative one copy of each of its pleadings, as defined by § 1201.4(b). A certificate of service describing how and when service was made must accompany each pleading. Each party is responsible for notifying the Board and the other parties in writing of any change in name, address, telephone number, or facsimile number of the party or the party's representative.
[62 FR 48451, Sept. 16, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 59863, Oct. 20, 2003; 69 FR 57630, Sept. 27, 2004; 73 FR 10130, Feb. 26, 2008; 77 FR 62370, Oct. 12, 2012]
#### City of Dixon, Appellant, v. Jacob Mayer, Appellee.

Gen. No. 5,896.

(Not to be reported in full.)

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lee county; the Hon. Richard S. Fabband, Judge, presiding.

Heard in this court at the October term. 1913.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 15, 1914.

Statement of the Case.

Action by City of Dixon against Jacob Mayer to enforce an ordinance of the City of Dixon prohibiting the keeping and maintaining of a house of ill fame therein. Proceedings were instituted in the justice court, where defendant was tried before a jury, found guilty and fined. On appeal from the justice to the Circuit Court a verdict of not guilty was returned and judgment entered thereon. To reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court, plaintiff appeals.

Mark C. Keller, for appellant.

Brooks & Brooks, for appellee.

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Disorderly house, § *2*
      ***
      *—when evidence of general reputation incompetent.*On trial of a person for keeping a house of ill fame, testimony of a witness as to the general reputation of defendant’s house for chastity and morals in that community is incompetent.

2. Evidence, § *459*
      ***
      *—what inadmissible to prove testimony of a deceased witness on former trial.*On appeal from a justice of the peace to the Circuit Court, the transcript of the evidence of a witness who testified before the justice and who afterwards died, *held*improperly admitted.

3. Evidence, § *459*
      ***
      *—foundation for introduction in evidence of what a witness swore to on former trial.*Proof merely that a certain officer who tried to find a witness on subprena failed to find him *248is insufficient to lay a foundation for the introduction in evidence at the trial on appeal to the Circuit Court of what he swore to before the justice.

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

*247Mr. Presiding Justice Whitney

delivered the opinion of the court.

*2484. Municipal corporations, § *85*
      ***
      *—power to establish rules of evidence.*An ordinance declaring that general reputation shall be sufficient to convict a person of keeping a house of ill fame is void. A city cannot establish rules of evidence.

5. Appeal and error, § 1561*—where *refusal of requested instruction harmless.*Refusal of a requested instruction embodied in an instruction given *held*not error.
#### § 19.33 General order; transportation in bond.

The provisions of §§ 19.29 through 19.32 shall be applicable to those parts of any premises in which imported wheat is stored in a general-order status, or stored pending exportation under an entry for exportation or for transportation and exportation.
#### § 2412.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations that the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), including the Authority component (Authority), the General Counsel of the FLRA (General Counsel), the Inspector General (IG), and the Federal Service Impasses Panel (Panel), follow under the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a. These regulations should be read together with the Privacy Act, which provides additional information about records maintained on individuals. The regulations apply to all records maintained by the Authority, the General Counsel, the IG, and the Panel that are contained in a system of records, as defined at § 2412.2(d), and that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier. They describe the procedures by which individuals may request access to records about themselves, request amendment or correction of those records, and request an accounting of disclosures of those records. In addition, the regulations limit the access of other persons to those records. The Authority, the General Counsel, the IG, and the Panel also process all Privacy Act requests for access to records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, giving requesters the benefit of both statutes. These regulations do not relate to those personnel records of Federal Government employees, which are under the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) jurisdiction, to the extent such records are subject to OPM regulations.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan W.Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| **/s/ DAN W. MATTHIAS**   | ** ** | ** ** |
|---------------------------|------------|------------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| August 8, 2008       |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,692,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  702,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   386,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,038,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,708,000
<PP&E>                                         812,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,743,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,461,000
<BONDS>                                        239,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,842,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,743,000
<SALES>                                      3,842,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,842,000
<CGS>                                        2,055,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,055,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (113,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,878,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,608,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,608,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Court Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-2502

___________ Charles A. Aldrich, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Laura L. Nelson; Department of * Human Services; Office of Child * [UNPUBLISHED] Support and Collections, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 4, 2003 Filed: December 10, 2003

___________ Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles A. Aldrich appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil action arising out of Aldrich’s child-support obligations, and the court’s imposition of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 sanctions.-2- Upon de novo review, we affirm the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for the reasons that the district court explained, see Lemonds v. St. Louis County , 222 F.3d 488, 492-93 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1183 (2001), and we find no abuse of discretion in the imposition of Rule 11 sanctions given the frivolousness of this lawsuit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        **

**PURSUANT        TO SECITON 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS        (A0 AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF **

**TITLE        18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

|                                         |                                                 |                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                            |                                            |
| Date:                 November 13, 2005 | By:                                        | /s/                 Robert                Ellin |
|                                         | Robert                Ellin, Chief Executive Officer |

|                                           |                                                                                            |                                |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                       |                           |
| Date:                   November 13, 2005 | By:                                                                                   | /s/                   Jay Wolf |
|                                           | Jay                  Wolf, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial                  Officer |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Telik, Inc. (the Company), and Cynthia M. Butitta, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended; and
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set
their hands hereto as of the 9th day of March, 2005.



|                                                                  |  |                                                                       
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL M. WICK                                            |  | /s/    CYNTHIA M.
BUTITTA                                             
|Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | Cynthia M. Butitta Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Telik, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.