alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONSI, Joseph F. Trungale, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Perkins & Marie Callender’s Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: March 26, 2008 BY: /s/ Joseph F. Trungale           Joseph F. Trungale    President and Chief Executive Officer  
91
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-040 July 13, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO MEET WITH ENTERGY ON JULY 19th TO DISCUSS 

PILGRIM LICENSE RENEWAL AUDIT FINDINGS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Entergy representatives on

Wednesday, July 19, to discuss the findings of a team audit associated with the license renewal

application for the Pilgrim nuclear power plant. Entergy submitted the application to the NRC in late

January. It seeks an additional 20 years of operation for the plant, which is located in Plymouth, Mass. 

The current operating license for the facility is set to expire on June 8, 2012.

The NRC performs audits early in the license renewal review process to evaluate

whether the application is consistent with established guidance and NRC staff positions. Additional

technical reviews, including inspections, of the application will take place over the next 12 months. 

The conclusions from the audits, technical reviews and inspections will be incorporated into a safety

evaluation report, which is expected to be issued next July. 

The meeting is scheduled to take place from 9 a.m. until noon at the Radisson Plymouth

Harbor Hotel, 180 Water St. in Plymouth. It will be open to public observation. Following the

business portion of the meeting, the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public. 

Under NRC regulations, the original operating license for a nuclear power plant has a

duration of up to 40 years. The license may be renewed for up to an additional 20 years if NRC

requirements are met. Information on the license renewal process is posted on the NRC’s web page at

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal.html. Information specific to Pilgrim’s

application is posted at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/pilgrim.html.

###
§ 339.305 Records and reports. ( a ) Agencies will receive and maintain all medical documentation and records of examinations obtained under this part in accordance with part 293, subpart E, of this chapter.
( b ) The report of an examination conducted under this subpart must be made available to the applicant or employee under the provisions of part 297 of this chapter.
( c ) Agencies must forward to the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP), Employment Standards Administration, Department of Labor, a copy of all medical documentation and reports of examinations of employees who are receiving or have applied for injury compensation benefits under 5 U.S.C. chapter 81, including continuation of pay. The agency must also report to OWCP the failure of such employees to report for examinations that the agency orders under this subpart. When the employee has applied for disability retirement, this information and any medical documentation or reports of examination must be forwarded to OPM.
### §474. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165

Section, act Mar. 6, 1896, ch. 49, §§1–3, 29 Stat. 54, 55; Apr. 26, 1906, ch. 1874, §§1, 2, 34 Stat. 136; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097; Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §§1, 20, 63 Stat. 496, 561; Pub. L. 89–670, §6(b)(1), Oct. 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 938, related to anchorage and general regulations for St. Marys River.
#### Marion F. de B. Rafailovich, Respondent, v. Michael A. Embiricos Shipping Corporation, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 *846costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
EXHIBIT 12.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, José Luis Palomo Alvarez, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Endesa, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Endesa, S.A. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Endesa,
S.A.'s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Endesa, S.A. and have:



5.     Endesa,
S.A.'s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Endesa, S.A.'s auditors
and the audit committee of Endesa, S.A.'s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 30, 2004

| |  | By: |  | /s/José Luis Palomo Alvarez
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
| |  |     |  | Name:                      
| |  |     |  | Title:                     

---



QuickLinks
### SUBCHAPTER V—PROSECUTION OF WORK GENERALLY
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24214]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & 
Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

Meeting Date and time: Friday, November 12, 2004, 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Bucks County Audubon Society, Honey Hollow Environmental 
Education Center, 6324 Upper York Road, New Hope, PA 18938.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to 
assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions 
in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and 
promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission 
reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18, 
1988, and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, 
Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 1 South Third 
Street, 8th Floor, Easton, PA 18042. (610) 923-3548.

    Dated: October 22, 2004.
C. Allen Sachse,
Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-24214 Filed 10-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Conceptus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thethree months ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: August 7, 2008

 
| /s/ Mark M. Sieczkarek  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Mark M. Sieczkarek      |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
### §653. Extension of jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission

The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission (established by the Act of June 29, 1879 1 (33 U.S.C. 641)) is extended to include—

(1) Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana; and

(2) the area bounded by the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee, the Mississippi River Levee, and Bayou Lafourche and extending from Morganza, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico, insofar as such area is affected by the flood waters of the Mississippi River.

(Pub. L. 102–580, title III, §301, Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4838.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 29, 1879 (33 U.S.C. 641), referred to in text, probably means the act of June 28, 1879, ch. 43, 21 Stat. 37, which enacted sections 641 to 644, 646, and 647 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1722. Injunction and specific enforcement authority

#### (a) Civil action by Attorney General

In addition to any other remedy under this chapter or any mineral leasing law, the Attorney General of the United States or his designee may bring a civil action in a district court of the United States, which shall have jurisdiction over such actions—

(1) to restrain any violation of this chapter; or

(2) to compel the taking of any action required by or under this chapter or any mineral leasing law of the United States.

#### (b) Venue

A civil action described in subsection (a) may be brought only in the United States district court for the judicial district wherein the act, omission, or transaction constituting a violation under this chapter or any other mineral leasing law occurred, or wherein the defendant is found or transacts business.

(Pub. L. 97–451, title I, §112, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2456.)
#### § 1.2 Extent of the competitive service.

The competitive service shall include: (a) All civilian positions in the executive branch of the Government unless specifically excepted therefrom by or pursuant to statute or by the Office of Personnel Management (hereafter referred to in this subchapter as OPM) under § 6.1 of this subchapter; and (b) all positions in the legislative and judicial branches of the Federal Government and in the Government of the District of Columbia which are specifically made subject to the civil service laws by statute. OPM is authorized and directed to determine finally whether a position is in the competitive service.
#### § 148.41 Articles carried through the United States.

An arriving nonresident who is in transit to a place outside U.S. Customs territory may take with him through U.S. Customs territory for carriage to such place articles not exceeding $200 in aggregate value (including not more than 4 liters of alcoholic beverages) without the payment of duty or internal revenue taxes as provided in subheading 9804.00.40, Chapter 98, U.S. Note 3, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (19 U.S.C. 1202).

[T.D. 73-27, 38 FR 2449, Jan. 26, 1973, as amended by T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49788, Oct. 25, 1978; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51264, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 97-82, 62 FR 51771, Oct. 3, 1997]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Suite 101.com, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Mitchell G. Blumberg,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Mitchell G. Blumberg
------------------------
Mitchell G. Blumberg
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2002


                                       35
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman
American Credit Corp., manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to (S) 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

/s/ David Salzman
---------------------------------------------
David Salzman
Chief Executive Officer of Richman American
Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant
August 15, 2005



                                       19
#### § 2423.33 Posthearing briefs.

Except when bench decisions are issued pursuant to § 2423.31(d), posthearing briefs may be filed with the Administrative Law Judge within a time period set by the Judge, not to exceed 30 days from the close of the hearing, unless otherwise directed by the judge, and shall satisfy the filing and service requirements of part 2429 of this subchapter. Reply briefs shall not be filed absent permission of the Judge. Motions to extend the filing deadline or for permission to file a reply brief shall be filed in accordance with § 2423.21.
### §3004. Strength and distribution in grade

#### (a) Grades

The commissioned grades in the commissioned officer corps of the Administration are the following, in relative rank with officers of the Navy:

(1) Vice admiral.

(2) Rear admiral.

(3) Rear admiral (lower half).

(4) Captain.

(5) Commander.

(6) Lieutenant commander.

(7) Lieutenant.

(8) Lieutenant (junior grade).

(9) Ensign.

#### (b) Grade distribution

The Secretary shall prescribe, with respect to the distribution on the lineal list in grade, the percentages applicable to the grades set forth in subsection (a).

#### (c) Annual computation of number in grade

#### (1) In general

Not less frequently than once each year, the Secretary shall make a computation to determine the number of officers on the lineal list authorized to be serving in each grade.

#### (2) Method of computation

The number in each grade shall be computed by applying the applicable percentage to the total number of such officers serving on active duty on the date the computation is made.

#### (3) Fractions

If a final fraction occurs in computing the authorized number of officers in a grade, the nearest whole number shall be taken. If the fraction is one-half, the next higher whole number shall be taken.

#### (d) Temporary increase in numbers

The total number of officers authorized by law to be on the lineal list during a fiscal year may be temporarily exceeded if the average number on that list during that fiscal year does not exceed the authorized number.

#### (e) Positions of importance and responsibility

Officers serving in positions designated under section 3028(a) of this title and officers recalled from retired status shall not be counted when computing authorized strengths under subsection (c) and shall not count against those strengths.

#### (f) Preservation of grade and pay

No officer may be reduced in grade or pay or separated from the commissioned officer corps of the Administration as the result of a computation made to determine the authorized number of officers in the various grades.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §214, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3083; Pub. L. 116–259, title I, §101, Dec. 23, 2020, 134 Stat. 1154.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 853a of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–259 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section established strength and distribution of officers in grades.
#### § 2638.205 Collection of confidential financial disclosure reports.

This section establishes the procedure that the executive branch will use to collect confidential financial disclosure reports from employees of the executive branch. To the extent not inconsistent with part 2634 of this chapter or with the approved forms, instructions, and other guidance of the Office of Government Ethics, the DAEO of each agency will determine the means by which the agency will collect confidential financial disclosure reports, including a determination as to whether the agency will collect such reports in either paper or electronic format. Nothing in this paragraph limits the authority of the agency to provide reasonable accommodations under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112), as amended, or other applicable legal authority.
### §77. Alabama coal lands; agricultural entry

Unreserved public lands containing coal deposits in the State of Alabama which on April 23, 1912, were being withheld from homestead entry under the provisions of section 171 of this title, may be entered under the homestead laws of the United States subject to the provisions, terms, conditions, and limitations prescribed in sections 83 to 85 of this title.

(Apr. 23, 1912, ch. 87, 37 Stat. 90.)
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Public Affairs, Region I

475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19401

Fax: 610/337-5241

Internet: dps@nrc.gov or nas@nrc.gov

I-97-151 November 28, 1997

Contact: Diane Screnci (610/337-5330) FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Neil A. Sheehan (610/337-5331)

NRC, PSE&G TO DISCUSS LESSONS LEARNED FROM SALEM UNIT 2 RESTART

Lessons learned during the restart of the Salem nuclear

power plant’s Unit 2 will be the subject of a meeting on

Thursday, December 4, between Nuclear Regulatory Commission

staff and officials of Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G)

Company, the facility’s operator.

The meeting will begin at 1:30 p.m. in the Access

Processing Facility at the plant, located in Hancocks Bridge,

N.J. It will be open to the public for observation.

Salem Unit 2 resumed power production this fall following

a more than two-year shutdown. During the outage, PSE&G

addressed multiple programmatic problems, repaired degraded

equipment and improved corrective action processes. The NRC

and PSE&G will review not only the work involved in Unit 2's

restart but also how the lessons learned during that effort can

be applied to the restart of Unit 1, which has been out of

service since May 16, 1995.

After the reactors were shut down, the NRC issued a

Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL), on June 9, 1995, detailing

changes the utility needed to make to improve the plant and

requiring that the reactor remain off-line until those

commitments were met. The CAL was modified last August to

allow the restart of Unit 2. The December 4 meeting will

satisfy the last remaining item in that letter pertaining to

Unit 2.

The CAL remains in place for Unit 1, pending the

resolution of its restart issues. .

#