alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1668 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1668

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 North Fifth 
   Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ``Ed Edmondson United States 
                             Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1668

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 North Fifth 
   Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ``Ed Edmondson United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 101 North Fifth Street in 
Muskogee, Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the ``Ed Edmondson 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Edmondson 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 3, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
----

**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | The                Quarterly                Report on Form 10-Q of Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for                the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                November 11, 2005 | /s/                Richard T. BrockRichard                T.                BrockChief                Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                    |
|                                    |                                                                                                                    |
|                                    |                                                                                                                    |
| Dated:                November 11, 2005 | /s/                David                G. Kane                                                                         |
|                                    | David                G.                KaneController(Principal                Financial Officer)                       |
§ 1215.24 Claims involving criminal activity or misconduct. ( a ) A debtor whose indebtedness involves criminal activity such as fraud, embezzlement, theft, or misuse of government funds or property is subject to punishment by fine or imprisonment as well as to a civil claim by the United States for compensation for the misappropriated funds. The MSPB will refer these cases to the appropriate law enforcement agency for prosecution.
( b ) Debts involving fraud, false claims, or misrepresentation shall not be compromised, terminated, suspended, or otherwise disposed of under this rule. Only the Department of Justice is authorized to compromise, terminate, suspend, or otherwise dispose of such debts.
#### § 185.145 Deposit in Treasury of the United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in section 3806(g) of title 31, United States Code.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.11

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT, made this 4th day of December, 2003, by and between SCS
Transportation, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("SCST"), and Herbert A. Trucksess,
III (the "Executive").

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, SCST and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement on
November 20, 2002 pursuant to which the Executive agreed to serve as President
and Chief Executive Officer of SCST (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, the parties retained the right to amend the Agreement pursuant
to Section 24 thereof; and

         WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to clarify the
calculation of the Executive's Supplemental Retirement Benefit:

         NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of November 20, 2002, the Agreement is
amended as follows:

         1. Section 4(d) is amended to read as follows:

(d)      Supplemental Retirement Benefit. SCST shall provide the Executive with
a Supplemental Retirement Benefit following his termination of employment. The
Supplemental Retirement Benefit shall be paid in monthly installments for life
commencing on the first day of the month coincident with or next following the
later of (a) the Executive's termination of employment or (b) the Executive's
attainment of age 65. The amount of the monthly Supplemental Retirement Benefit
shall equal (i) minus (ii) minus (iii) below, where:

(i) is One twelfth of the excess of [Total Credited Service multiplied by Final
Average Earnings multiplied by 1-3/7% (.0142857)] over [Primary Social Security
multiplied by Total Credited Service multiplied by 1-3/7%(.0142857)];

(ii) is the sum of (a) the monthly normal retirement benefit payable from the
qualified Yellow Freight Office, Clerical, Sales and Supervisory Personnel
Pension Plan, and (b) the monthly Supplemental Retirement Benefit payable under
the Executive's Employment Agreement with Yellow Corporation; and

(iii) is the monthly benefit payable at age 65 that is the Actuarial Equivalent
of the portion of SCST's non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan attributable
to SCST contributions at date of termination.

<PAGE>

2. The Phrase "SCS" is deleted from Section 4(g)(1) and replaced with "SCST".

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the 4th
day of December 2003.

EXECUTIVE                                 SCS TRANSPORTATION, INC.

/s/ Herbert A. Trucksess III              By: /s/ James J. Bellinghausen
---------------------------------             ----------------------------------
Herbert A. Trucksess, III
                                                  ATTEST

                                          By: /s/ G. Drown
                                              ----------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64025-64026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1357]


Approval of Export Processing Authority Within Foreign-Trade Zone 
25; Broward County, FL; S.B. Marketing Worldwide, Inc. (Apparel 
Printing)

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u)

[[Page 64026]]

(the Act), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 
following Order:
    Whereas, Broward County, Florida, grantee of FTZ 25, has requested 
authority under 15 CFR Sec.  400.32(b)(1) of the Board's regulations on 
behalf of S.B. Marketing Worldwide, Inc., to process (screen printing) 
foreign-origin shirts for export under zone procedures within FTZ 25 
(filed 7-30-2004, FTZ Docket 31-2004);
    Whereas, pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(b)(1), the Commerce Department's 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration has the authority to act 
for the Board in making such decisions on new manufacturing/processing 
activity under certain circumstances, including situations where the 
proposed activity is for export only (15 CFR 400.32(b)(1)(ii)); and,
    Whereas, the FTZ Staff has reviewed the proposal, taking into 
account the criteria of 15 CFR 400.31, and the Executive Secretary has 
recommended approval;
    Now, therefore, the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
acting for the Board pursuant to 15 CFR 400.32(b)(1), concurs in the 
recommendation and hereby approves the request subject to the Act and 
the Board's regulations, including 15 CFR 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October, 2004.
James J. Jochum,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-24551 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
### §3857. Remedies not affected

#### (a) In general

Nothing in this chapter limits, denies, amends, modifies, or repeals any other remedy available to the United States.

#### (b) Relationship to State and local law

Nothing in this chapter limits, denies, amends, modifies, or repeals any rights under existing law, of any State, territory, or possession of the United States, or any political subdivision thereof, to regulate any antifouling system. Compliance with the requirements of a State, territory, or possession of the United States, or political subdivision thereof related to antifouling paint or any other antifouling system does not relieve any person of the obligation to comply with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 111–281, title X, §1047, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3031.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title X of Pub. L. 111–281, Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3023, which enacted this chapter and repealed chapter 37 (§2401 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of title X to the Code, see Tables.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Latrice Williams v. Dana Lee

Appellate case number: 01-10-00296-CV

Trial court case number: 0827802

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

The findings of the trial court complying with this Court’s abatement orders have been 

received by the Clerk of this Court. Therefore, we order the appeal REINSTATED.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to mail a hard copy of the supplemental clerk’s records 

received on September 24, 2012 and February 5, 2012 to the appellant. 

Appellant’s Motion for Sanctions and to Compel, filed during the period of abatement, is 

DENIED. The court reporter has filed all the records specified by this Court in its July 30, 2012 

order. As indicated in that order, the filing of these records completed the reporter’s record in 

this appeal. Further, based on the findings of the trial court, the clerk’s record is now complete 

in this appeal. 

Therefore, appellant is hereby ORDERED to file her brief 30 days from the date of this 

order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief will be due 30 days from the date 

appellant’s brief is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b). No extensions will be granted based on 

any further claims regarding deficiencies in the record.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 12, 2013
### §1506. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–324, title V, §506, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3927

Section, Pub. L. 93–627, §7, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2135; Pub. L. 98–419, §2(g), (h), Sept. 25, 1984, 98 Stat. 1607, provided for antitrust review by Attorney General and Federal Trade Commission prior to issuance of license for ownership, construction, and operation of deepwater port.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Annual Report”) for the purposes of complying withRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Rafael MirandaRobredo, the Chief Executive Officer and José Luis Palomo Álvarez, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Endesa, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:

1.                the Annual Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Endesa, S.A.
| Date: May 17, 2006 |   |
|--------------------|--------|
|                    | By:    | /S/  RAFAEL MIRANDA ROBREDO |
|               |   | Name: | Rafael Miranda Robredo |
|               |   | Title: | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|               |   | /s/ JOSÉ LUIS PALOMO ÁLVAREZ |
|               |   | Name: | José Luis Palomo Álvarez |
|               |   | Title: | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### § 1305.2 Production prohibited unless approved.

No employee or former employee of OMB shall, in response to a demand of a court or other authority, produce any material contained in the files of OMB, disclose any information relating to materials contained in the files of OMB, or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as part of the performance of the person's official duties, or because of the person's official status, without the prior approval of the General Counsel.
#### Harbison-Walker Refractories Company, Appellant, v. One Hundred and Ninetieth Street Realty Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-002 February 14, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO CONTINUE HEIGHTENED INSPECTIONS AT HONEYWELL

ALTHOUGH PLANT OPERATED SAFELY DURING PAST YEAR

Public Meeting To Be Held February 22 in Metropolis

 The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a report saying the Honeywell Specialty

Chemicals plant at Metropolis, Ill., operated safely during the past year, but the agency will continue

heightened inspections at the facility until further corrective actions and long-term performance

improvements are achieved.

 NRC officials will discuss the results of the agency’s Licensee Performance Review at a public

meeting Feb. 22 in Metropolis at 8:30 a.m. (local time) at the Metropolis Community Center, located at

516 Superman Square. Interested members of the public are invited to attend for purposes of

observation, and members of the NRC staff will be available to answer questions after the business

portion of the meeting but before the meeting is adjourned.

 The NRC reviewed performance at the Honeywell facility for a period from November 21, 2004

until December 9, 2005. The agency said in the Jan. 27 report that Honeywell “ensured that licensed

activities were conducted safely during the review period” but that further improvement is needed in

adherence to procedures related to conduct of operations, corrective action program management and

management of procedures. 

 A copy of the letter to the company with its enclosures will be available from the NRC Public

Document Room in Washington, D.C. at 1-800-397-4209 or electronically from the NRC web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . The accession number is ML060270156.

###
| | Exhibit 32.1
| | ------------

Certification
of Chief Executive Officerof Prime Medical Services, Inc.

|This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Prime Medical Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Issuer).
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Brad A. Hummel, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated:  May 5, 2004

| | /s/ Brad A. Hummel

Brad A. Hummel
President and Chief Executive Officer
Prime Medical Services, Inc.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Deborah ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-16707.

D.C. No. CV-00-02590-MEJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, THOMAS, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Deborah Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying her Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion and affirm because Anderson failed to show any ground for relief. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir.1993).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-019 April 1, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY 

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF CLINTON NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon

Generation Company on Thursday, April 8, to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of safety

performance at the Clinton Nuclear Power Plant during 2003. The facility is located near Clinton,

Illinois.

The meeting will be held at 1 p.m. at the Vespasian Warner Public Library, 310 N. Quincy

Street, in Clinton. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available

before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public. In addition, the NRC staff

will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

The NRC concluded that the plant operated safely last year. All NRC inspection findings

during the year were of very low safety significance. This inspection record and the plant’s

performance indicators (statistical data measuring safety performance) led the agency to conclude that

the Clinton plant does not require NRC oversight beyond the normal routine inspection program.

Routine inspections are performed by the two NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant

and by inspection specialists from Region III office in Lisle, Illinois. 

A March 4 letter from the NRC to Exelon officials addresses the performance of the plant

during 2003 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/clin_2003q4.pdf

With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories to

enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of these

requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat conditions. 

The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

Current performance indicators and inspection findings for Clinton are available on the NRC

web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CLIN/clin_chart.html

# # #
EXHIBIT 10(a)






WEINICK
  SANDERS
    LEVENTHAL & CO., LLP
                                                                   1375 BROADWAY
                                                                  NEW YORK, N.Y.
                                                                      10018-7010
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS                        212-869-3333
                                                                FAX 212-764-3060
                                                                   WWW.WSLCO.COM








                 CONSENT OF WEINICK SANDERS LEVENTHAL & CO., LLP
                   (INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS)








We  consent  to the use in  Amendment  No. 5 to the  Registration  Statement  of
SearchHelp,  Inc. on Form SB-2, SEC File 333-97687,  under the Securities Act of
1933 of our report dated March 15, 2002 (except for Note 14 as to which the date
is  November  9,  2002)  and to the  reference  to our firm  under  the  heading
"Experts" in the Prospectus.







                                /s/ WEINICK SANDERS LEVENTHAL & CO., LLP




New York, New York
January 21, 2003