alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1521 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1521

 To provide for additional lands to be included within the boundary of 
the Johnstown Flood National Memorial in the State of Pennsylvania, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2003

  Mr. Murtha introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for additional lands to be included within the boundary of 
the Johnstown Flood National Memorial in the State of Pennsylvania, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Johnstown Flood National Memorial 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF JOHNSTOWN FLOOD NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Memorial 
(``Memorial'') is modified to include the area as generally depicted on 
the map entitled ``Johnstown Flood National Memorial, Cambria County, 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania'', numbered N.E.R.O. 427/80,007 and dated 
June, 2001. The map shall be on file and available for inspection in 
the appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the 
Interior.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LANDS.

    The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') is authorized to 
acquire from willing sellers the land or interests in land as described 
in section 2 by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, 
or exchange.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF LANDS.

    Lands added to the Memorial by section 2 shall be administered by 
the Secretary as part of the Memorial in accordance with applicable 
laws and regulations.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    In addition to amounts otherwise made available for land 
acquisition, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may 
be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|  |     **Product reviews**  **Shopping**  **Tech news**  **Downloads** |  |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|  |                                                                                                                       |  |
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
|  |  | TVsMusicCell phonesCamerasGamesHandheldsDesktopsNotebooksPeripheralsMore »Back to school guide	   	CNET At Work     	Find an ISP |  |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |  | Digital cameras- New digital camera reviews
- Digital Camera Buying Guide
- Top digital cameras
- Camcorders
- Digital camera discussions
- The Digital Home
- The Ultimate Office
Get our RSS digital camera feed **What's this?****What it is****Real-life users****Product reviews****Video guide:**How Internet calling works**Click to play**- Digital camera resolutions
- Less than 2 megapixels
- 2 megapixels
- 3 megapixels
- 4 megapixels
- 5 megapixels
- 6 to 8 megapixels
- 8 megapixels and up
- Digital camera manufacturers
- Canon
- Casio
- Fujifilm
- Gateway
- HP
- Kodak
- Konica Minolta
- Nikon
- Olympus
- Panasonic
- Pentax
- Sony
- Vivitar
- All digital camera manufacturers
- Lowest price
- Less than $100
- $100-$250
- $250-$400
- $400-$600
- $600-$800
- $800-$1,000
- $1,000-$1,400
- More than $1,400
- Related digital camera products
- Flash memory
- WebCams
- Camera accessories
- Image-editing software
**Amazing Dell Promotions, Technology and Complete Solutions.** |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5TH CIR.R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In The United States Court Of Appeals

For The Fifth Circuit

No. 06-30772

Summary Calendar

ELLIOTT MUHAMMAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

No. 2:05-CV-812

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elliot Muhammad sued to enjoin the seizure by the United States of fundsin his bank

account. The United States filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and the district

court granted the motion on the groundsthat the Anti-Injunction Act prohibits a suit to enjoin

the collection of taxes. Muhammad appeals.

The Anti-Injunction Act generally providesthat “no suitfor the purpose of restraining
1

I.R.C. § 7421(a) (2000).

2Enochs v. Williams Packing & Nav. Co., 370 U.S. 1, 8 (1962).

3

547 U.S. 220 (2006).

2

the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court by any person,

whether or notsuch person isthe person against whom such tax was assessed.”1 Muhammad

first argues that the Anti-Injunction Act does not apply because hissuit was not to enjoin the

collection of taxes, but rather to enjoin the improper seizure of property. However, the

Government provided ample evidence of a valid assessment of taxes against Muhammad.

When, as is the case here, collecting officers have made a tax assessment and claim that the

assessment is valid, the Anti-Injunction Act prohibits suits for injunctions barring collection

the taxes.2 Muhammad has not shown that any statutory or judicial exception to the AntiInjunction Act applies.

Muhammad also argues he is entitled to sue because the Government violated his

constitutional rights. He specifically cites Jones v. Flowers3and similar cases for the

proposition that the Government’s failure to provide adequate notice violated his

constitutional right to due process. If Muhammad had claimed that Government took his

property without due process, and he had sued the Government for damages, Jones would

support his claim. But Muhammad sued to enjoin the Government from collecting taxes, and

the fact that he raises constitutional claims does not allow him to avoid the Anti-Injunction
4

See Linn v. Chivatero, 714 F.2d 1278, 1282 (5th Cir. 1983) (“Linn’s decision to cast his

lawsuit in constitutional terms does not mean that the Anti-Injunction Act is inapplicable.”).

3

Act’s prohibition of such a suit.4 Of course, the Anti-Injunction Act does not prohibit

Muhammad from suing the Government if the Government has taken his property in

violation of the Constitution. It merely prohibits suits like Muhammad’s, where the plaintiff

seeks to enjoin the collection of taxes.

We AFFIRM.
1 * Order 2014

- 12

- 17



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP O RTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Depart m ent of Transportation

on the 20 th Day of January 201 5

Application of

VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIRWAYS, LTD.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE Docket DOT

- OST

- 2013

- 0068

KONINKLIJKE LUCHTVAART MAATSCHAPPIJ N.V.

ALITALIA

- COMPAGNIA AEREA ITALIANA S.P.A

under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for approval of

and antitrust immunity for alliance agreements

Joint Application of

Alitalia

- Linee Aeree Italiane

- S.p.A.,

C zech A irlines

Delta Air Lines, Inc., Docket DOT

- OST

- 2007

- 28644

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines,

Northwest Airlines, Inc, and

Société Air France

f

or Approval of and Antitrust Immunity for Alliance

Agreements under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 413092 Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD. Docket DOT

- OST

- 2002

- 11842

SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE

ALITALIA

- LINEE AEREE ITALIANE

- S.p.A.

CZECH AIRLINES

under 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for approval of

and antitr u st immunity for alliance agreements

Joint Application of

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

SOCIÉTÉ AIR FRANCE

ALITALIA

- LINEE AEREE ITALIANE

- S.p.A. Docket DOT

- OST

- 2001

- 10429

CZECH AIRLINES

u nder 49 U.S.C. §§ 41308 and 41309 for approval of

and antitr u st immunity for alliance agreements

ERRATUM

*In Order 2014

- 12

- 17, on page 3, ordering paragraph 1 is amended to read :

1. We a m end Order 2013

- 9

- 1 4 by striking the phrase “Alitalia Compagnia Aerea

Italiana S. P .A.” from ordering paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, and ins e rti n g in its

pla c e “Alitalia

– Società Aerea Italiana S.p.A.”

.3 By:

SUSAN L

. KURLAND

A ssista n t Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available at http://www.regul a tions.gov
#### § 250.209 Consequences of improper agency actions.

If OPM finds that an agency has taken an action contrary to a law, rule, regulation, or standard that OPM administers, OPM may require the agency to take corrective action. OPM may suspend or revoke a delegation agreement established under 5 U.S.C. 1104(a)(2) at any time if it determines that the agency is not adhering to the provisions of the agreement. OPM may suspend or withdraw any authority granted under this chapter to an agency, including any authority granted by delegation agreement, when OPM finds that the agency has not complied with qualification standards OPM has issued, instructions OPM has published, or the regulations in this chapter of the regulation. OPM also may suspend or withdraw these authorities when it determines that doing so is in the interest of the civil service for any other reason.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T May 15, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 8

- 1 5 3 6 9 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 2

- 0 0 4 4 9

- C R

- T

- 1 7 M S S

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

P H I L L I P W A I N W R I G H T ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( M a y 1 5 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B I R C H , H U L L a n d K R A V I T C H , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :
J a m e s W

. S m i t h , I I I , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r P h i l l i p W a i n w r i g h t i n t h i s a p p e a lf

r o m t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e n i a l o f a m o t i o n t o r e d u c e W a i n w r i g h t ’ s s e n t e n c e u n d e r
1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , h a s m o v e d t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e

a p p e l l a n t a n d f

i l e d a b r i e f p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

.
1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e

r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o i s s u e s o f a r g u a b l e m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s
G R A N T E D , a n d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e n i a l o f r e l i e f u n d e r § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) i s
A F F I R M E D

.

2
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-027 May 19, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR FERMI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Detroit Edison Co.

Wednesday, May 25, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at the Fermi

Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Newport, Mich.

The meeting, which will be open to public observation, is scheduled to begin at

6 p.m. at the Monroe County Board Of Commissioners’ Chambers of the County Courthouse, 125 E.

Second Street, in Monroe, Mich.

Before the meeting is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the

public on the safety performance of the Fermi plant, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe

plant operation.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Fermi plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Fermi plant operated safely during the period. The

NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

During 2004, Fermi had one “white” performance indicator that had to do with the

unavailability of emergency AC power. The NRC also identified several findings related to human

performance.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill., and the agency’s headquarters in

Rockville, Md. Among the areas of plant operations to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are

radioactive waste and transportation, fire protection, problem identification and resolution, radiological

access control, and safety system design and performance.
A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/ferm_2004q4.pdf.

Current performance information for Fermi is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FERM2/ferm2_chart.html.

###
§ 1653.32 Qualifying Federal tax levy. ( a ) The TSP record keeper will only honor the terms of a tax levy that is qualifying under paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A tax levy must meet each of the following requirements to be considered qualifying: ( 1 ) The Internal Revenue Service issued the levy.
( 2 ) The levy includes a signature certifying that it attaches to a retirement plan.
( 3 ) The levy requires the TSP to pay a stated dollar amount from a TSP participant's account.
( 4 ) The levy is dated no earlier than thirty (30) days before receipt.
( 5 ) The levy is issued in the name of the participant only.
( 6 ) The levy expressly refers to the “Thrift Savings Plan” or describes the TSP in such a way that it cannot be confused with other Federal Government retirement benefits or non-Federal retirement benefits.
( c ) The following levies will not be considered qualifying: ( 1 ) A levy relating to a TSP account with a zero dollar account balance;
( 2 ) A levy relating to a TSP account that contains only nonvested money, unless the money will become vested within 30 days of the date the TSP receives the order if the participant were to remain in Government service;
( 3 ) A levy requiring the TSP to make a payment at a specified date in the future;
( 4 ) A levy that does not contain a signature certifying that it applies to retirement plans;
( 5 ) A levy requiring a series of payments;
( 6 ) A levy that designates the specific TSP core fund, source of contributions, or balance from which the payment or portions of the payment shall be made.
[79 FR 53604, Sept. 10, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 31691, May 24, 2022]
§ 2610.104 Proceedings covered. ( a ) This part applies to adversary administrative adjudications conducted by the Office of Government Ethics. When all other conditions in the Act and in these rules are met, the types of proceedings to which this part applies are adversary administrative adjudications conducted by the Office under: ( 1 ) The Debt Collection Act of 1982, 5 U.S.C. 5514;
( 2 ) The Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 605, 607;
( 3 ) The Ethics in Government Act of 1978, section 402(f)(2), 5 U.S.C. app., and subpart E of part 2638 of this chapter.
( b ) The Office's failure to identify a type of proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filing of an application by a party who believes the proceeding is covered by the Act; whether the proceeding is covered will then be an issue for resolution in the proceedings on the application.
( c ) If a proceeding includes both matters covered by the Act and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered matters.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy. 

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), I hereby certify that the renewal, for a period of four months, of the charter of the American Statistical Association Committee on Energy Statistics is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of Energy by law. This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat of the General Services Administration, pursuant to section 102-3.60, title 41, Code of Federal Regulations. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Rachel M. Samuel at (202) 586-3279. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice on a continuing basis to the Administrator of the Energy Information Administration (EIA), including: 

1. Periodic review of and advice on Energy Information Administration data collections and analysis programs; 

2. Advice on technical and methodological issues in planning, operation, and the review of Energy Information Administration statistical programs and their relative priorities; and 

3. Advice on matters concerning improved energy modeling and forecasting tools, particularly regarding their functioning, relevancy, and results. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on: October 27, 2004. 

Carol Matthews, 

Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 04-24356 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Aviation Security: Additional Actions Needed to Meet Domestic and
International Challenges (Chapter Report, 01/27/94, GAO/RCED-94-38).

In the aftermath of the 1988 terrorist bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has taken many steps to strengthen
security at U.S. airports; however, many questions about domestic and
international aviation security remain unanswered.  This report examines
in detail FAA's efforts to (1) assess, in conjunction with the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, the security of domestic airports; (2)
determine whether a similar level of protection exists for U.S. citizens
traveling on foreign airlines; and (3) improve security for mail and
cargo.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  RCED-94-38
     TITLE:  Aviation Security: Additional Actions Needed to Meet 
             Domestic and International Challenges
      DATE:  01/27/94
   SUBJECT:  Airline industry
             Safety standards
             Transportation safety
             Airports
             Facility security
             Inspection
             Terrorism
             International relations
             Regulatory agencies
IDENTIFIER:  FAA Civil Aviation Security Information System
             USPS Parcel Mail Security Program
             FAA Research, Engineering, and Development Program
             FAA Security Inspection and Information System
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```