alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-084 May 25, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET JUNE 1-3 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting June 1-3 in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, the interim review of the

license renewal application for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, in Wisconsin, and the draft Safety

Evaluation Report related to the Grand Gulf Early Site Permit Application. It will also cover nuclear

plant fire protection matters and policy issues related to new plant licensing.

The meeting, to be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike, will run from 8:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Wednesday and Thursday, and from 8:30

a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on Friday. A complete agenda is available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2005/ . Individuals with questions or those

wanting to make public statements during the meeting should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-

7364.

###
|  |     **Product reviews**  **Shopping**  **Tech news**  **Downloads** |  |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|  |                                                                                                                       |  |
|  |  | b.gif width=1 height=9>b.gif width=1 height=9>TVsMusicCell phonesCamerasGamesHandheldsDesktopsNotebooksPeripheralsMore »Back to school guide	   	CNET At Work     	Find an ISPNetworking-  Wireless network buying guide
-  Wireless World
- Business networking guide
- New reviews
- Top networking products
-  Message boards
-  The Digital Home
-  The Ultimate Office
Get our RSS networking feed **What's this?****What it is****Real-life users****Product reviews****Video guide:**How Internet calling works**Click to play**- Networking standards
-  Ethernet
-  Telephone line
- 802.11a
- 802.11b
- 802.11g
- Network adapters
-  PCI card
- PC Card
- USB
- Wireless
- All network adapters
- Manufacturers
-  Apple
-  3Com
- D-Link
-  Intel
-  Linksys
- Netgear
- Proxim
-  All manufacturers
- Networking hardware
-  Hubs
- Routers
- Gateways
-  Print servers
-  Access points
-  Servers
- Internet services
-  Hotspot Zone
-  Web hosting
- Internet access
-  Bandwidth meter
-  Domain name search
-  Host power search
- Sponsor showcase
-  Weekly Specials at Dell Business!
**Amazing Dell Promotions, Technology and Complete Solutions.** |
|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS TO THE COMPANY’S REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM
S-8








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-112569) of Ambient Corporation of our
report dated March 30, 2010 relating to the financial statements which appears
in this Form 10-K.








/s/
Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C.





Rotenberg
Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C.


Certified
Public Accountants


Saddle
Brook NJ


March 30,
2010
#### § 214.201 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part:

*Agency, Senior Executive Service position, career appointee, limited term appointee, limited emergency appointee,* and *noncareer appointee* have the meanings set forth in section 3132(a) of title 5, United States Code.

*Equivalent position* as used in section 3132(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code, means a position under any pay system where the level of the duties and responsibilities of the position and the rate of pay are comparable to that of a position above GS-15 or at Executive Level IV or V.

*Senior Executive Service* has the meaning given that term by section 2101a of title 5, United States Code, and includes all positions which meet the definition in section 3132(a)(2) of title 5.

[45 FR 62414, Sept. 19, 1980, as amended at 56 FR 18661, Apr. 23, 1991]
#### § 1312.21 Purpose and authority.

This subpart sets forth procedures for the receipt, storage, accountability, and transmission of classified information at the Office of Management and Budget. It is issued under the authority of Executive Order 12958, (60 FR 19825, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., P.333), as implemented by Information Security Oversight Office Directive No 1 (32 CFR part 2001), and is applicable to all OMB employees.
### §§681 to 689. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 681, Pub. L. 87–347, §1, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 766, stated purpose of this chapter as establishment and maintenance of a program of stabilization payments (which terminated December 31, 1969) to small domestic producers of lead and zinc ores and concentrates in order to stabilize the mining of lead and zinc by such producers. See note for section 687 below.

Section 682, Pub. L. 87–347, §2, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 766; Pub. L. 89–238, §1(1), Oct. 5, 1965, 79 Stat. 925, provided for stabilization payments (which terminated December 31, 1969) and conditions and limitations of payments. See note for section 687 below.

Section 683, Pub. L. 87–347, §3, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 767; Pub. L. 89–238, §1(2), Oct. 5, 1965, 79 Stat. 925, provided for additional limitations on payments which terminated on December 31, 1969. See note for section 687 below.

Section 684, Pub. L. 87–347, §4, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 767, authorized Secretary to promulgate such regulations and require such reports as deemed necessary to carry out program of stabilization payments (which terminated December 31, 1969) under this chapter. See note for section 687 below.

Section 685, Pub. L. 87–347, §5, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 768, authorized Secretary to delegate functions relating to stabilization payments (which terminated December 31, 1969) under this chapter to Administrator of General Services. See note for section 687 below.

Section 686, Pub. L. 87–347, §6, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 768; Pub. L. 88–75, July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 92; Pub. L. 89–238, §1(3), Oct. 5, 1965, 79 Stat. 925, defined terms as used in this chapter relating to stabilization payments which terminated December 31, 1969. See note for section 687 below.

Section 687, Pub. L. 87–347, §7, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 768; Pub. L. 89–238, §1(4), Oct. 5, 1965, 79 Stat. 925, provided that no payment be made under this chapter after Dec. 31, 1969, but permitted authorized payment only if application therefor was filed not later than Mar. 31, 1970.

Section 688, Pub. L. 87–347, §8, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 768, required annual reports to Congress on operations relating to stabilization payments (which terminated December 31, 1969) under this chapter not later than first day of March each year. See note for section 687 above.

Section 689, Pub. L. 87–347, §9, Oct. 3, 1961, 75 Stat. 768; Pub. L. 89–238, §1(5), Oct. 5, 1965, 79 Stat. 925, related to penalties for procuring a stabilization payment (which terminated December 31, 1969) not entitled to under this chapter and civil and criminal liability for keeping a payment not entitled to under this chapter. See note for section 687 above.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64107-64108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Security Industry Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 20, 2004, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Security Industry 
Association (``SIA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: Security 
Industry Association, Alexandria, VA. The nature and scope of SIA's 
standards development

[[Page 64108]]

activities are: Standards for the manufacturers of electronic security 
equipment, including those activities related to the design, 
production, installation, monitoring, maintenance, and other treatments 
or aspects of electronic security equipment, including alarm and non-
alarm equipment, such as law enforcement response and telecommunication 
signaling utilizing the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24560 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ONIX SYSTEMS INC.'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                                  6,067
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          36,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,576
<INVENTORY>                                            28,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      110,236
<PP&E>                                                 20,553
<DEPRECIATION>                                          9,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        183,041
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  30,584
<BONDS>                                                 1,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  156
<OTHER-SE>                                            147,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          183,041
<SALES>                                               139,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      139,969
<CGS>                                                  91,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          91,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       10,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          943
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         3,894
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,575
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     2,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            2,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.16


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6276

MELVIN CHICHESTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

H. R. POWELL, Warden of the Deerfield Correctional Center; S. D. MAYES, Chief of Security,

Deerfield Correctional Center; CAPTAIN BRACEY,

Deerfield Correctional Center; CAPTAIN GIBBS,

Deerfield Correctional Center; LIEUTENANT

GRAVES, Deerfield Correctional Center; LIEUTENANT SPEIGHT, Deerfield Correctional Center;

SERGEANT NICKENS, Deerfield Correctional

Center; JOHN DOE, I, Correctional Officer,

Deerfield Correctional Center; JOHN DOE, II,

Correctional Officer, Deerfield Correctional

Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-95-1055-2)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Chichester, Appellant Pro Se.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Chichester filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1988), and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because

assessing a partial filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom,

650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982),

and E.D. Va. Loc. R. 28(C)(4), would exceed the statutory filing

fee, the district court assessed a partial filing fee in an amount

that was ten percent less than the statutory filing fee. Chichester

did not pay the assessed fee but instead filed this appeal. This

appeal is properly before us. Roberts v. United States Dist. Court,

339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950). Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §2342. Access to water resource data

#### (a) In general

Using available funds, the Secretary shall make publicly available, including on the Internet, all data in the custody of the Corps of Engineers on—

(1) the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of water resources development projects; and

(2) water quality and water management of projects owned, operated, or managed by the Corps of Engineers.

#### (b) Limitation

Nothing in this section may be construed to compel or authorize the disclosure of data or other information determined by the Secretary to be confidential information, privileged information, law enforcement information, national security information, infrastructure security information, personal information, or information the disclosure of which is otherwise prohibited by law.

#### (c) Timing

The Secretary shall ensure that data is made publicly available under subsection (a) as quickly as practicable after the data is generated by the Corps of Engineers.

#### (d) Partnerships

In carrying out this section, the Secretary may develop partnerships, including through cooperative agreements, with State, tribal, and local governments and other Federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2017, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1077; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1135, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1656.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–322 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to access to water resource data.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Data Transparency

Pub. L. 116–260, div. AA, title I, §158(b), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2662, provided that: "The Secretary [of the Army] shall prioritize making publicly available water resources data in the custody of the Corps of Engineers, as authorized by section 2017 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 2342)."

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
**Certification**

I, Timothy W. Miciotto, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controlover financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (f) and15d-15 (f)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b)      Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;

c)      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedurespresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

November 21, 2005

/s/ TIMOTHY W. MICIOTTO 

Timothy W. Miciotto                Chief Financial Officer
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle IL 60532

No. III-01-001 January 9, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of

John Adams as an agency Resident Inspector at the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station near Cordova,

Illinois.

Adams, who began his duties at the Quad Cities plant in August 2000, joined the NRC in

March of 1996. He last worked as a NRC Resident Inspector at Braidwood Nuclear Power Station in

Braidwood, Illinois. Prior to that, he worked as a reactor engineer in the agency’s regional office in

Lisle, Illinois.

Other positions Adams held prior to joining the NRC include: reactor manager for Iowa State

University’s research reactor program; assistant to the vice-president of generation for Corn Belt Power

in Humboldt, Iowa; shift supervisor at Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plant near Wilmington, Delaware;

reactor operator at the Duane Arnold Nuclear Power Plant in Palo, Iowa; and as an operator at the Fast

Flux Test Facility in Hanford, Washington. Adams also served in the U.S. Navy Nuclear Propulsion

Program, specifically on fast attack submarines.

Adams earned a bachelor’s degree in energy and power technology from the University of

Northern Iowa. He and his wife, Debra, live in Bettendorf, Iowa.

Adams joins Senior Resident Inspector Chris Miller at Quad Cities. They can be reached at the

plant at (309) 654-2227.

###
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6837

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. PETER PAUL, a/k/a Peter Paul Alexander, a/k/a Sluggie, a/k/a Peter P. Alexander, a/k/a Mark Eric Green, a/k/a Mark Harris, a/k/a Paul Eustance, a/k/a Derrick Anderson , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:95

- cr - 00104

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : October 22, 2020 Decided: October 27, 2020

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Peter Paul, Appellant Pro Se

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Peter Paul appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion seeking a sentence modification under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See U nited States v. Jackson , 952 F.3d 492, 502 (4th Cir. 2020) (“Even assuming ... that a district court in a First Step Act sentence reduction proceeding has equivalent duties to a court initially sentencing a defendant, ... [w]e are satisfied that the distri ct court considered the parties’ arguments and had a reasoned basis for exercising its own legal decisionmaking authority.” ( brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’ s order. United States v. Paul , No. 3 : 95

- cr - 00104

- REP

- 1 (E.D. Va. May 22, 2020 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED