alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 317.304 Conversion of career and career-type appointees. ( a ) *Coverage.* This section covers employees serving under: ( 1 ) A career or career-conditional appointment; or
( 2 ) A similar type of appointment (“career-type” appointment) in an excepted service position as determined by the Office. A career-type appointment is an appointment in the excepted service other than an appointment: ( i ) To a Schedule C position established under part 213 of this chapter;
( ii ) To a position authorized to be filled by noncareer executive assignment under part 305 of this chapter;
( iii ) To a position which meets the same criteria as a Schedule C position or a position authorized to be filled by non-career executive assignment; or
( iv ) To a position where the incumbent is traditionally changed upon a change in Presidential Administrations.
( b ) *Senior Executive Service appointment.* An employee covered by this section shall be converted to a Senior Executive Service career appointment. The employee may be assigned to either a “general” or a “career reserved” position.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 51092 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ISAAC DWAYNE CALDWELL, also known as Isaac Caldwell, also known as Issac Caldwell, also known as Issac Dwayne Caldwell, also known as Isaac Coldwell, also known as Ahmad Devon Haywood

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Cons. w/ No. 13

- 51094

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ISAAC CALDWELL,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:09

- CR

- 90

- 1 USDC No. 1:11

- CR

- 456

- 1 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-51092 Document: 00512751341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 13

- 51092 c/w No. 13

- 51094

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Isaac Dwayne

Caldwell has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United State s v. Flores , 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Caldwell h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal s present no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsi bilities herein, and the

APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

2 Case: 13-51092 Document: 00512751341 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
#### § 1651.11 Simultaneous death.

If a beneficiary dies at the same time as the participant, the beneficiary will be treated as if he or she predeceased the participant and the account will be paid in accordance with § 1651.10. The same time is considered to be the same hour and minute as indicated on a death certificate. If the participant and beneficiary are killed in the same event, death is presumed to be simultaneous, unless evidence is presented to the contrary.
### §59mm. Coalbank Slough deemed not navigable waters of the United States for certain purposes

The Coalbank Slough in Coos Bay, Oregon, is deemed to not be navigable waters of the United States for all purposes of subchapter J of Chapter I of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations.

(Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXIV [LXXXIV], §8436, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4736.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 26, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. IB Bancshares, Inc., McKinney, Texas, and VB Bancshares, Inc., 
New Castle, Delaware; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of 
First Celina Corporation, Celina, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
The First State Bank, Celina, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 27, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-24351 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 28, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                           3,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    128,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,248
<PP&E>                                         101,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,845
<BONDS>                                         45,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,396
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,706
<SALES>                                        305,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,726
<CGS>                                          216,213
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,982
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71




</TABLE>
§ 330.607 Applying CTAP selection priority. ( a ) An agency must not place any other candidate from within or outside the agency into a vacancy if there is an available CTAP selection priority candidate, unless the personnel action to be effected is an exception under § 330.609.
( b ) In accordance with the conditions of part 300, subpart E, of this chapter, an agency may not procure temporary help services under that subpart until a determination is made that no CTAP eligible is available.
( c ) CTAP selection priority applies to a vacancy that: ( 1 ) Is at a grade or pay level with a representative rate no higher than the representative rate of the grade or pay level of the CTAP eligible's permanent position of record;
( 2 ) Has no greater promotion potential than the CTAP eligible's permanent position of record;
( 3 ) Is in the same local commuting area as the CTAP eligible's permanent position of record;
( 4 ) Is filled during the CTAP eligible's eligibility period; and, if applicable,
( 5 ) Is filled under the same excepted appointing authority as the CTAP eligible's permanent position of record if the CTAP eligible is an excepted service employee and the agency CTAP provides selection priority in the excepted service.
( d ) An agency may take actions under § 335.102 of this chapter to place a permanent competitive service employee into a vacancy if there are no CTAP eligible employees in the local commuting area or if no CTAP eligibles apply for the vacancy.
( e ) An agency component may place a component employee within the local commuting area in the vacancy after the component applies CTAP selection priority to its employees.
( f ) If there are two or more CTAP selection priority candidates for a vacancy, the agency may place any of them. An agency may decide the specific order of selection among CTAP selection priority candidates. For example, an agency may: ( 1 ) Provide a displaced candidate higher priority than a surplus candidate; or
( 2 ) Provide an internal component candidate higher priority than another component's candidate.
( g ) After an agency makes the vacancy available to its CTAP eligibles and meets its obligation to any CTAP selection priority candidates, the agency may place into the vacancy any other permanent competitive service candidate from within its workforce, under appropriate staffing procedures.
( h ) An agency may provide CTAP selection priority to eligible employees from another commuting area after fulfilling its obligation to CTAP selection priority candidates in the local commuting area.
( i ) An agency may deny a CTAP eligible future selection priority if the eligible: ( 1 ) Declines an offer of a permanent appointment at any grade or pay level in the competitive or excepted service; or
( 2 ) Fails to respond within a reasonable period of time, as defined by the agency, to an offer of a permanent appointment at any grade or pay level in the competitive or excepted service.
( j ) Before appointing an individual from outside the agency's permanent competitive service workforce, the agency must follow the requirements of subparts B and G of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Envirotest
Systems Corp. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         143,417
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                       468
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,664
<PP&E>                                         192,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 476,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,046
<BONDS>                                        365,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   476,452
<SALES>                                         31,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,179
<CGS>                                           24,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,174)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,174)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,174)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
        

</TABLE>
§ 2422.1 What is your purpose for filing a petition? You, the petitioner, may file a petition for the following purposes: ( a ) *Elections or eligibility for dues allotment.* To request: ( 1 ) ( i ) An election to determine whether employees in an appropriate unit wish to be represented for the purpose of collective bargaining by an exclusive representative, and/or
( ii ) A determination of eligibility for dues allotment in an appropriate unit without an exclusive representative; or
( 2 ) An election to determine whether employees in a unit no longer wish to be represented for the purpose of collective bargaining by an exclusive representative.
( 3 ) Petitions under this subsection must be accompanied by an appropriate showing of interest.
( b ) *Clarification or amendment.* To clarify, and/or amend: ( 1 ) A recognition or certification then in effect; and/or
( 2 ) Any other matter relating to representation.
( c ) *Consolidation.* To consolidate two or more units, with or without an election, in an agency where a labor organization is the exclusive representative.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul
Roy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean
Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


November
16, 2009
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 8

- 00 382

- C R



### ____________________

ROBERT JASON LOGAN

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 75th District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. CR28367

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court sentenced Robert Jason Logan on February 10, 2012

. Logan

filed a notice of appeal on September 27 , 201 8 , more than thirty days after

sentencing. We notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not app arent from the

notice of appeal and further notified them that the appeal would be dismissed for

want of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing

the appeal. Logan filed a response in which he argues that he timely filed a notice of

appeal from th e trial court’s September 10, 2018 , ord er denying Logan’s motion to2 enter a judgment nunc pro tunc

. An order denying Logan’ s motion for judgment

nunc pro tunc is not independently appealable. See Everett v. State , 82 S.W.3d 735,

735 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, pet. dism’ d ). 1 We dismiss t he appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on October 30, 2018

Opinion Delivered October 31, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

1 A nunc pro t unc judgment is appealable. Blanton v. State , 369 S.W.3d 894,

904 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In this case, however, the trial court denied Logan’s

request and did not sign a judgment nunc pro tunc

.
#### § 351.901 Appeals.

An employee who has been furloughed for more than 30 days, separated, or demoted by a reduction in force action may appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board.

[52 FR 46051, Dec. 4, 1987]
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Reuben H. Cudliff to be made a Party Plaintiff.

Argued December *3,*1878;

decided December 10, 1878.)

*E. J. Spink*for appellant.

*Beach*& *Brown*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal without opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.
#### § 2425.5 Content and format of opposition.

If you choose to file an opposition, then you may file your opposition on an optional form that is available on the FLRA's Web site at *www.flra.gov*, or in any other format that is consistent with this section. You meet this requirement if you file your opposition electronically through use of the FLRA's eFiling system on that Web site. Your failure to use, or properly fill out, an Authority-provided form will not, by itself, provide a basis for dismissing your opposition. If you choose to file an opposition, and you dispute any assertions that have been made in the exceptions, then you should address those assertions—including any assertions that any evidence, factual assertions, arguments (including affirmative defenses), requested remedies, or challenges to an awarded remedy were raised before the arbitrator. If the excepting party has requested an expedited, abbreviated decision under § 2425.7 of this part, then you should state whether you support or oppose such a decision and provide supporting arguments. You must provide copies of any documents upon which you rely (which you may upload as attachments if you file your opposition electronically through use of the FLRA's eFiling system), unless the Authority can easily access those documents (as discussed in § 2425.4(b) of this part) or the excepting party provided them with its exceptions.

[77 FR 26435, May 4, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.513 Worker-related subsidies. ( a ) *Benefit.* In the case of a program that provides assistance to workers, a benefit exists to the extent that the assistance relieves a firm of an obligation that it normally would incur.
( b ) *Time of receipt of benefit.* In the case of assistance provided to workers, the Secretary normally will consider the benefit as having been received by the firm on the date on which the payment is made that relieves the firm of the relevant obligation.
( c ) *Allocation of benefit to a particular time period.* Normally, the Secretary will allocate (expense) the benefit from assistance provided to workers to the year in which the benefit is considered to have been received under paragraph (b) of this section.
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-018 April 5, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC TO DISCUSS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF SEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of FPL Energy

Seabrook, LLC, on Monday, April 12, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment of

safety performance at the Seabrook nuclear power plant. FPL operates the plant, which is located

in Seabrook, N.H.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at

3 p.m. at the Hampshire Inn, 20 Spur Road (Route 107) in Seabrook. Before the session is

adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public on the plant’s safety

performance, as well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2003. In

addition, NRC staff will provide a brief overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process

works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office to plant officials addresses the

performance of the plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. 

It is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/seab_2003q4.pdf .

 Overall, the Seabrook plant operated safely and met all cornerstone objectives during

the period. (Cornerstones are measures of plant performance.) However, based on a “white”

Performance Indicator for reactor coolant system leakage during the fourth quarter of 2003, the

plant will receive some additional oversight. The Performance Indicator was exceeded as a result

of a reactor coolant system flow instrument leak that took place on November 11, 2003. The

leak was halted early the next day when plant operators closed valves to isolate it. In response to

the change in the Performance Indicator, the NRC will conduct a supplemental inspection at the

plant in May to review corrective actions related to the problem. Other than that inspection, the

NRC will conduct baseline-level inspections at the plant.
 With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories

to enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of

these requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat

conditions. The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

 Current performance information for the Seabrook plant is available on the NRC web

site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/SEAB1/seab1_chart.html .

 # #