EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA = NotApplicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee 

### X April 5,2011 Lake County APCD April 27,2011 C.G. Allen


# I (b) Evidenceof adoption

(c) StatelDistrict legal authorityto adopt 

### X (dl)Copy of actual rulelplan 

### X (d2) Rule changes indicatedby underlinelcross-out N/A (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

### X (f) Copy of public notice 

### X 

# I (g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice 

# I X 

# I

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A 'TECHNICALSUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified 

### X (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

### X (c) Rulelplan emissions impact 

### N/A (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A (e) Modeling supportas appropriate 

# I N/A 

# I (f) Reliance on cor~tinuous emission reductions N/A (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements 

# I N/A 

# I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS CEPA Region9 SIP COMPLETENESSCHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete N/A = NotApplicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer April 5,2011 MojaveDesertAQMD April 27,2011 

### C.G. Allen

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee (b) Evidence of adoption (c) StateIDistrict legal authority to adopt (dl) Copy of actual rulelplan 

# I (1) Copy of public notice 

# I x 

# I X X X X (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinelcross-out (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

### X X 

# I (h) Public comments & agency response 

# I x 

# I I I I

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice
TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2) I I I I I 

### X 

# I (a) Regulated pollutants identified 

# I I 

# I (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I NIA 

# I

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified (c) Rulelplan emissions impact 

### X NIA 

# I (f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions 

## 1x1 

# I I I

(e) Modeling support as appropriate NIA (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements ~



### X (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes: NI A OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA = Not Applicable To Rule 0 = Material Missing

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (~er A~~endix V. Section 2.1 Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer 

# I (a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee 

# I x April 5,2011 Placer County APCD April 27,2011 

### C.G. Allen



# I (dl)Copy of actual rulelplan 

# I X

(b) Evidenceof adoption (c) StateIDistrict legal authority to adopt 

### X X 

### ( (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

# I X

(d2) Rule charrges indicatedby underlinelcross-out (f) Copy of public notice (g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice 

### X 

# I (h) Public comments 

### & agency response 

# I x I

'TECHNICALSUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified (b) Affected sources 

### & attainment status identified (c) Rulelplan emissions impact (d) Attainment, PSD 

### & other required demonstration (e) Modelingsupport as appropriate (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions (g) Evidenceof limits 

### & other needed requirements (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy



### Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### C C C CEPA Region9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete N/A = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer April 5,2011 Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD April 27,2011 

### C.G.Allen

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section2.1) 

# I (dl)Copy of actual rulelplan

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee (b) Evidenceof adoption (c) StateIDistrict legal authorityto adopt 

# I (e) Proofthat action met procedural requirements 

# I X 

# I X X X X (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinelcross-out 

# I (f) Copy of public notice 

# I x 

# 1 x X X X
X


# I (h) Public comments& agency response 

# 1 x 

# 1 x X
(g) Certification that hearingfulfilled public notice 

### X
TECHNICAL SUPPORT (perAppendix V, Section 2.2)

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I N/A 

### X
(a) Regulated pollutants identified (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified (c) Rulelplanemissions impact 

### X X X
(f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions 

# I x (e) Modeling support as appropriate (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements 

# I X N/A I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes: N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### C C C CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete N/A = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section2.1) I I I I I April 5,2011 Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD April 27,2011 

### C.G. Allen

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee (b) Evidenceof adoption 

# I (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinelcross-out 

# I X 

# I X X (c) StatelDistrict legal authority to adopt (dl)Copyof actual rulelplan 

### X X 

# I (g) Certification that hearingfulfilled public notice 

# I X 

# I

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements (f) Copy of public notice 

### X X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified (h) Public comments & agency response 

# I (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

### X

(c) Rulelplan emissions impact (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I (e) Modeling supportas appropriate

(f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions 

# 1 (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements 

# I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA = Not ApplicableTo Rule 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1) I I I I I I April 5,2011 San JoaquinValley UnifiedAPCD April 28,2011 

### C.G.Allen



# I (c) StateIDistrict legal authority to adopt 

## lxlxlxlxl

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee (b) Evidenceof adoption 

# I (e) Proofthat action met procedural requirements 

# I X

# I X

# I X

# I X 

# I X X (dl) Copy of actual rulelplan (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinelcross-out 

### X X
X NI A (f) Copy of public notice (g) Certificationthat hearingfulfilled public notice (h) Public comments & agency response TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2) 

### X X
X X
X X X (a) Regulated pollutants identified (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

### X X
X X

(c) Rulelplanemissions impact (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I (g) Evidence

### of limits & other needed requirements 

# I X

# I X

# I X X X X
X X
(e) Modeling support as appropriate (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions 

# I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy 

# I NIA 

# I NIA 

# I NIA 

### X X X

X NIA 

### X X

NIA



### X

Notes: 

### X X NI A NIA

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### X NIA NIA



### X NIA 

### X

C C C CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix V, Section 2.1) I I I I I I April 5,2011 San JoaquinValley UnifiedAPCD April 28,2011 

### C.G. Allen

(a) Submittal letter from Governortdesignee (b) Evidenceof adoption 

### X X (c) StatetDistrict legalauthority to adopt (dl) Copy of actual ruletplan (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinetcross-out 

# I (g) Certificationthat hearingfulfilled public notice 

# I X 

# I X X X (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements (f) Copy of public notice 

### X X (h) Public comments & agency response 

# I (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

# I X 

# I I I X TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified
(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I N/A 

# I I I I 

### X (c) Ruletplan emissions impact 

# I (e) Modeling support as appropriate 

# I N/A 

# I I I X


# I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

(f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements 

### X X

Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix 

### V Key: C 

### = Complete I 

### = Incomplete NIA 

### = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 

### = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer April 5,2011 SantaBarbara County APCD April 28,2011 

### C.G. Allen

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS(per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letterfrom Governorldesignee

- - - - - -

(b) Evidenceof adoption (c) StateIDistrict legal authorityto adopt 

### X 

### X (dl) Copy of actual rulelplan (d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out I I 1 I 

### X

- (c) Rulelplanemissions impact NIA NIA 

### X I I I I 

### X X


### X X (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

### X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix 

### V, Section2.2)



### (d) Attainment, PSD& other required demonstration 

# I NIA 

# 1 NIA 

# I NIA 

# 1 I 1 I I 

### X X X

X 

# ---- X X X (f) Copy of public notice (g) Certificationthat hearing fulfilled public notice (h) Public comments & agency response

(e) Modelingsupport as appropriate 

# I NIA 

# I NIA 

# I NIA 

# I I I I I 

### X X X X X X X 

### X X X (a) Regulated pollutants identified



# 1 (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions 

# 1 NIA 

# 1 NIA 

# 1 X 

# 1 

# 1 X X



### X X X

(g) Evidence of limits& other needed requirements (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS NIA NIA



### C NIA NIA 

### X NIA 

### C CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete N/A = NotApplicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer April 5,2011 SouthCoastAQMD April 28,2011 C.G. Allen


# I (b) Evidenceof adoption 

## lxlxlxlxl ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS(perAppendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee (c) StateJDistrict legalauthority to adopt (dl) Copy of actual rule/plan 

# I (f) Copy of public notice 

## lxlxlxlxl X

(d2) Rule changes indicatedby underline/cross-out (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

### X X



# I (h) Publiccomments & agency response 

# 1 x 

# 1 x X
X X X X (g) Certification that hearingfulfilled public notice 

### X X X

X
TECHNICAL SUPPORT (perAppendix V, Section 2.2) 

# I (d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I NIA 

# I NIA 

### X

X
(a) Regulated pollutants identified (b) Affected sources & attainment status identified (c) Rule/plan emissions impact 

# I (f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions 

# 1 x 

# 1 x X X X (e) Modeling support as appropriate 

### X X X

I I NIA (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements NIA
(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes: 

### X

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### X NIA NIA



### C C C CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (perAppendix V, Section 2.1) I I I I I April 5,2011 South CoastAQMD April 28,2011 

### C.G. Allen

(a) Submittal letter from Governorldesignee
(dl) Copy of actual rulelplan 

### X (b) Evidenceof adoption (c) StatelDistrict legal authorityto adopt 

# I (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinelcross-out I I I I 

### X X 

# I (e) Proof that action met procedural requirements 

# I (h) Public comments & agency response

(f) Copy 

### of public notice (g) Certification that hearingfulfilled public notice
TECHNICAL SUPPORT (perAppendix V, Section 2.2) I 

### X X 

# I (a) Regulated pollutants identified 

# I (b) Affected sourcds & attainment status identified 

# I (c) RuWplanemissions impact

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I (e) Modeling support as appropriate 

# I (f) Relianceon continuous emission reductions

(g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements 

# I (i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy

Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### CEPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST To evaluate compliancewith 40 CFR 51, Appendix V Key: C = Complete I = Incomplete NIA = Not Applicable To Rule 

### 0 = Material Missing Submittal Date District Name Date Reviewed EPA Reviewer

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1) I I I I I April 5,2011 Yolo SolanoAQMD April 28,2011 ., 

### C.G. Allen

(a) Subrr~ittal letter from Governortdesignee (b) Evidenceof adoption 

### X X (c) StatetDistrictlegal authorityto adopt 

### X (dl)Copy of actual rulelplan (d2) Rule changes indicated by underlinetcross-out
(g) Certificationthat hearingfulfilled public notice 

# I X 

# I X N/A (e) Proofthat action met procedural requirements (f) Copy of public notice 

### X X (h) Public comments & agency response
(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified 

# I X 

# I X TECHNICAL SLIPPORT (perAppendix V, Section2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified
(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration 

# I N/A 

# I (c) Rulelplanemissions impact (e) Modeling support as appropriate 

### X
NI A 

# 1

I I I I

(i) Justification for deviationfrom EPA policy (f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions (g) Evidenceof limits & other needed requirements - 

### X X

Notes:

OVERALL COMPLETENESS 

### C