alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ David Salzman                                                                                    |   |
| David                Salzman                                                                         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer of Richman American                  Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant |   |
| Date: March 12, 2008                                                                                 |   |
### SUBCHAPTER VII—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
§ 430.314 OPM review of agency systems. ( a ) Agencies must submit proposed SES performance management systems to OPM for approval. Agency systems must address the system standards and requirements specified in this subpart.
( b ) OPM will review agency systems for compliance with the requirements of law, OPM regulations, and OPM performance management policy, including the system standards specified at § 430.305.
( c ) If OPM finds that an agency system does not meet the requirements and intent of subchapter II of chapter 43 of title 5, United States Code, or of this subpart, OPM will identify the requirements that were not met and direct the agency to take corrective action, and the agency must comply.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 66336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 552 (Sub-No. 22)]


Railroad Revenue Adequacy--2017 Determination

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 21, 2018, the Board served a decision announcing 
the 2017 revenue adequacy determinations for the Nation's Class I 
railroads. Four carriers (BNSF Railway Company, Norfolk Southern 
Combined Railroad Subsidiaries, Soo Line Corporation, and Union Pacific 
Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate.

DATES: This decision is effective on December 21, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. 
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at (800) 877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board is required to make an annual 
determination of railroad revenue adequacy. A railroad is considered 
revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a) if it achieves a rate of 
return on net investment (ROI) equal to at least the current cost of 
capital for the railroad industry for 2017, determined to be 10.04% in 
Railroad Cost of Capital--2017, EP 558 (Sub-No. 21) (STB served Dec. 6, 
2018). This revenue adequacy standard was applied to each Class I 
railroad. Four carriers (BNSF Railway Company, Norfolk Southern 
Combined Railroad Subsidiaries, Soo Line Corporation, and Union Pacific 
Railroad Company) were found to be revenue adequate for 2017.
    The decision in this proceeding is posted on the Board's website at 
www.stb.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the 
Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at 
(202) 245-0238.

    Decided: December 17, 2018.

    By the Board, Board Members Begeman and Miller.
Tammy Lowery,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2018-27799 Filed 12-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1750

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase of $250 

per month in the rate of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) payable to a surviving spouse of a member of the Armed 

Forces who dies on active duty or as a result of a service-connected 

disability in any case in which there are dependent children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself, Mr. EVANS, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. 

MCINTYRE, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. FROST, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. STRICKLAND, and Mr. RYAN of Ohio) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an 

increase of $250 per month in the rate of monthly dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC) payable to 

a surviving spouse of a member of the Armed Forces 

who dies on active duty or as a result of a serviceconnected disability in any case in which there are dependent children.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1750 IH 

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN RATE OF MONTHLY DEPENDENCY 

2 AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION PAYABLE 

3 TO A SURVIVING SPOUSE WHEN THERE ARE 

4 DEPENDENT CHILDREN. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN DIC.—Section 1311(b) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘$250, plus’’ 

7 after ‘‘shall be increased by’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall take effect with respect to payments 

10 of dependency and indemnity compensation under section 

11 1311 of title 38, United States Code, for the first month 

12 beginning on or after the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act

Æ
§ 2.1 Competitive examinations and eligible registers; suitability and fitness for civil service employment. ( a ) OPM shall be responsible for: ( i ) Open competitive examinations for admission to the competitive service that will fairly test the relative capacity and fitness of the persons examined for the position to be filled.
( ii ) Standards with respect to citizenship, age, education, training and experience, physical and mental fitness, and for residence or other requirements that applicants must meet to be admitted to or rated in examinations.
( iii ) Standards of suitability based on character and conduct for appointment to a position in the competitive service, for appointment to a position in the excepted service where the incumbent can be noncompetitively converted to the competitive service, and for career appointment to a position in the Senior Executive Service.
( iv ) Minimum standards of fitness based on character and conduct for appointment in any other position in the excepted service of the executive branch, except for ( A ) positions in any element of the intelligence community as defined in the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, to the extent they are not otherwise subject to OPM appointing authorities, and
( B ) positions where OPM is statutorily precluded from prescribing such standards.”
( b ) In addition to the names of persons who qualify in competitive examinations, the names of persons who have lost eligibility on a career or career-conditional register because of service in the armed forces, and the names of persons who lost opportunity for certification or who have served under career or career-conditional appointment when OPM determines that they should be given certification, may also be entered at such places on appropriate registers and under such conditions as OPM may prescribe.
( c ) Whenever the Office of Personnel Management (1) is unable to certify a sufficient number of names to permit the appointing officer to consider three eligibles for appointment to a fourth-class postmaster position in accordance with the regular procedure, or (2) finds that a particular rate of compensation for fourth-class postmaster positions is too low to warrant regular competitive examinations for such positions, it may authorize appointment to any such position or positions in accordance with such procedure as may be prescribed by OPM. Persons appointed under this paragraph may acquire competitive status subject to satisfactory completion of a probationary period prescribed by OPM.
[28 FR 10023, Sept. 14, 1963, as amended by E.O. 13764, 82 FR 8115, Jan. 23, 2017]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         849,998
<SECURITIES>                                   132,874
<RECEIVABLES>                                  756,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (15,117)
<INVENTORY>                                    199,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,591,882
<PP&E>                                       1,245,433
<DEPRECIATION>                               (405,162)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,462,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,754,980
<BONDS>                                          2,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,232
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,548,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,462,515
<SALES>                                      7,009,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,009,852
<CGS>                                        5,399,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,399,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,087
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                636,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                   225,815
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            410,285
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   410,285
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24


</TABLE>
§ 337.202 Definitions. In this subpart: ( a ) A *direct-hire authority* permits hiring without regard to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 3309 through 3318; part 211 of this chapter; and subpart A of part 337 of this chapter.
( b ) A *severe shortage of candidates* for a particular position or group of positions means that an agency is having difficulty identifying candidates possessing the competencies or the knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform the job requirements despite extensive recruitment, extended announcement periods, and the use, as applicable, of hiring flexibilities such as recruitment or relocation incentives or special salary rates.
( c ) A *critical hiring need* for a particular position or group of positions means that an agency has a need to fill the position(s) to meet mission requirements brought about by circumstances such as, but not limited to, a national emergency, threat, potential threat, environmental disaster, or unanticipated or unusual event or mission requirement, or to conform to the requirements of law, a Presidential directive or Administration initiative.
#### § 317.504 [Reserved]
|  |  |   |  |
|--|--|--------|--|
|  |  |        |

| Brought to you by: |
|--------------------|

|  | E-mail to a friend    Send us feedback | **Archos AV420****Why you'll want it:**Sure, the Archos AV300 series, a well-fashioned portable MP3 and video player, had you commuting in style. But the AV420 does much more. It handles audio, video, and images--it includes an internal CompactFlash reader that can download images straight from your digital camera. Plus, they're calling it a portable TiVo, capable of integrating with your TV over IR to record multiple programs and play them back. Remote included.  **Read review**    **Check prices** |  |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |  |
|--|--|
**OFFICE OF**  **THE Al7ORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS** AUSTIN ~c.YNm --

I ’

. . . .

. . . .

. : .,. .**~Anydefendlmtteet~8e~sh6l1** bepeudtfed, butshellnotbeeompdll* ta testaylrAbisownbaalftherei&butitdull mtbeemwfor the j~intheirdaliberaS.ontoewau3ntonotdU8wstbe?aottamtthadeiaunt ruled to teo~.g Art&al8

wo of **the** ooda art

cddael Pmooume m,Vhis caurt is oonmitted t4 the rule that constitutional righta 3s~ be Indirectly imaaed aeeifectively

as if dlreotly

transgressaiL State of tel.Poachwe Sly, Supma., -/ civilliberty, should be applie$In a broad @I%% ta setsute

to the oltl.zen

bmnunity fxwn everykhd of self-accueation. A lftetal construction rouldaspthe it of Its emawp 0 0 No rot of Congress asn deprive

a cftita! of theptivllege

affanled

by the eon8fitutlon*

.. &a&8

.
§ 178.202 Definitions. ( a ) The term *deceased employees* as used in this part includes former civilian officers and employees who die subsequent to separation from the employing agency.
( b ) The *term money due* means the pay, salary, or allowances due on account of the services of the decedent for the Federal Government or the government of the District of Columbia. It includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) All per diem instead of subsistence, mileage, and amounts due in reimbursement of travel expenses, including incidental and miscellaneous expenses which are incurred in connection with the travel and for which reimbursement is due;
( 2 ) All allowances upon change of official station;
( 3 ) All quarters and cost-of-living allowances and overtime or premium pay;
( 4 ) Amounts due for payment of cash awards for employees' suggestions;
( 5 ) Amounts due as refund of salary deductions for United States Savings bonds;
( 6 ) Payment for all accumulated and current accrued annual or vacation leave equal to the pay the decedent would have received had he or she lived and remained in the service until the expiration of the period of such annual or vacation leave;
( 7 ) The amounts of all checks drawn in payment of such compensation which were not delivered by the Government to the officer or employee during his or her lifetime or of any unnegotiated checks returned to the Government because of the death of the officer or employee; and
( 8 ) Retroactive pay under 5 U.S.C. 5344(b)(2).
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-026 April 9, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF PROPOSES $60,000 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST DUKE ENERGY

FOR VIOLATION OF NRC REQUIREMENTS AT OCONEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $60,000 civil penalty against Duke

Energy Corporation for violation of NRC safety requirements at the Oconee Nuclear Station near

Seneca, South Carolina.

NRC inspectors found that the licensee revised an analysis of a hypothetical steam or feedwater

pipe break accident scenario in May 2001 without first obtaining NRC review and approval. The

revised analysis postponed the initiation time of required safety systems, which the NRC considers to

be a change to the Oconee Final Safety Analysis Report that requires prior NRC approval. 

NRC officials said the change may involve an increase in risk, and the NRC was not afforded

an adequate opportunity to perform its regulatory oversight function by reviewing the change.

The NRC said no problems occurred at Oconee as a result of the unauthorized changes and that

the company is in the process of implementing corrective actions.

The company has 30 days in which to either pay the civil penalty or to protest its imposition.

A copy of an NRC letter to Duke which outlines details of the civil penalty is available from

the NRC Office of Public Affairs in Atlanta and will be available through the NRC’s Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) on the NRC’s Web Site at

www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html . Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC Public

Document Room at 301-415-4737 or 1-800-397-4209.

###
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Karen L. Young, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Restaurant Company.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2006

                                                BY: /s/ Karen L. Young
                                                    ------------------
                                                Karen L. Young
                                                Acting Senior Financial Director
#### Maxwell M. Wallach, Appellant, v. Theresa R. Wallach, Respondent.

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate a final judgment of separation in favor of defendant, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 857.!
#### § 339.201 Disqualification by OPM.

OPM must review and decide upon an agency's request to pass over a candidate, who is a preference eligible, on medical grounds pursuant to § 339.306. OPM may deny an applicant employment by reason of physical or mental unfitness for the position for which he or she has applied. An OPM decision under this section or § 339.306 is separate and distinct from a determination of disability pursuant to statutory provisions for disability retirement under the Civil Service Retirement System and the Federal Employees' Retirement System.