alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-050 April 27, 2004

NRC ISSUES REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY

CONCERNING ELECTRIC GRID RELIABILITY

As part of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s response to the blackout of Aug. 14, 2003, the

NRC has issued a regulatory issue summary to remind nuclear power plant licensees of how the

availability of offsite power can affect nuclear power plant operations and safety. In addition, the

agency plans to conduct focused inspections of all licensed plants to assess their compliance with these

requirements.

Some of the regulations discussed in the summary deal with assessing the impact that

maintenance activities could have on plant operations if offsite power becomes unavailable. The

summary suggests licensees evaluate grid reliability when contemplating upcoming maintenance. The

summary also suggests utilities should consider rescheduling, when possible, maintenance during

periods when offsite power is determined to be unavailable. The summary recommends reliable

communications between plants and their transmission system operators, in order to increase awareness

of overall grid conditions.

NRC staff intend to complete their inspections by the end of this spring. A temporary

instruction for these inspections, based on the regulations outlined in the summary, will be issued in

advance.

The regulatory issue summary is available electronically through the NRC’s Agencywide

Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html , by entering accession number ML040990550. 

Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC’s Public Document Room at 800/397-4209 or 

301/415-4737.

###
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2006 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


March 16, 2006
Cite as 2016 Ark. 191

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. D-16-301

STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE

DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME

COURT COMMITTEE ON

PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

PETITIONER

V.

TERESA LYNETTE BLOODMAN,

ATTORNEY AT LAW, ABN 2005055

RESPONDENT

Opinion Delivered April 28, 2016

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

SPECIAL JUDGE

SPECIAL JUDGE APPOINTED.

PER CURIAM

Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on

Professional Conduct, has filed a petition for disbarment against the respondent, Teresa

Lynette Bloodman.

Pursuant to section 13(A) of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court

Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law, a special judge shall be appointed to

preside over the disbarment proceedings in the instant case. After hearing all the evidence

relevant to the alleged misconduct, the judge shall make findings of fact, conclusions of law,

and recommendations of an appropriate sanction, and shall file them, along with a transcript

and the record of the proceedings, with the clerk of the supreme court. 

We hereby appoint the Honorable Kim Smith as a special judge to hear this matter and

to provide the court with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of an
Cite as 2016 Ark. 191

appropriate sanction. Upon receipt of the special judge’s findings, we will render a decision

in this matter. 

It is so ordered.

WOOD, J., not participating.

2
#### Laura Jenkins, Respondent, v. Theodore Sidney Jenkins, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ro opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### §426–3. Transfer of functions of Beach Erosion Board

All functions of the Beach Erosion Board pertaining to review of reports of investigations made concerning erosion of the shores of coastal and lake waters, and the protection of such shores, are hereby transferred to the Board established by section 541 of this title, referred to as the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors.

(Pub. L. 88–172, §3, Nov. 7, 1963, 77 Stat. 305.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and Reassignment of Duties and Responsibilities

For termination of Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 180 days after Oct. 31, 1992, and reassignment of duties and responsibilities by Secretary of Army, see section 223 of Pub. L. 102–580, set out as a note under section 541 of this title.

#### Abolition of Beach Erosion Board

Section 1 of Pub. L. 88–172 abolished Beach Erosion Board, and is set out as a note under section 426 of this title. For transfer of certain functions of Board to Coastal Engineering Research Center, see section 426–1 of this title.
#### § 179.101 General collection standards.

The general standards and procedures governing the collection, compromise, termination, and referral to the Department of Justice of claims for money and property that are prescribed in the regulations issued jointly by the General Accounting Office and the Department of Justice pursuant to the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966 (4 CFR part 101 *et seq.*), apply to the administrative claim collection activities of OPM.

[33 FR 12406, Sept. 4, 1968]
§ 300.102 Policy. This subpart is directed to implementation of the policy that competitive employment practices: ( a ) Be practical in character and as far as possible relate to matters that fairly test the relative capacity and fitness of candidates for the jobs to be filled;
( b ) Result in selection from among the best qualified candidates;
( c ) Be developed and used without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy and gender identity), national origin, age (as defined by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended), disability, genetic information (including family medical history), marital status, political affiliation, sexual orientation, labor organization affiliation or nonaffiliation, status as a parent, or any other non-merit-based factor, or retaliation for exercising rights with respect to the categories enumerated above, where retaliation rights are available.
( d ) Insure to the candidate opportunity for appeal or administrative review, as appropriate.
[40 FR 15379, Apr. 7, 1975, as amended at 79 FR 43922, July 29, 2014]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Craig J. PORTER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-30397.

D.C. No. CR-95-00261-ALH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 6, 2002.

Decided May 17, 2002.

Before TROTT, T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior District Judge for Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Porter asks us to remand this case to the district court with instructions to resentence him using only the new, sanitized presentence report. Porter bases this request on our earlier remand of this matter on appeal from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. We did so, however, only “for initial consideration of Porter’s request that the Goranson Report be stricken from the presentence report.”

This language must be read in light of the issues in his § 2255 petition and his request for relief. First, the issues raised were ineffective assistance of counsel issues, and the relief requested in connection with those issues was that Porter’s guilty pleas be vacated. That request was denied, as was his suggestion that the matter be remanded with “direction to permit withdrawal of the plea.” Moreover, Porter had already attacked his sentence on direct appeal and lost, and he did not raise the Goranson Report issue at that time. Most importantly, however, in his § 2255 brief to us Porter identified adverse collateral consequences flowing from the presentence report’s inclusion of the Goranson Report and its use by prison officials in connection with his “terms of confinement.” He asked us to “direct the district court to issue an order to the Bureau of Prisons (1) to purge the Goranson Report from its files and to destroy all *553copies of the report in its possession and (2) to expunge paragraph 117 from the original and all copies of the presentence report.”

We asked the district court to respond to this limited request involving collateral consequences. Porter’s sentence itself was no longer an issue, both (1) because it had been affirmed on direct appeal, and (2) because it was not reopened as a result of his § 2255 petition. The district court did exactly what we asked it to do: sanitize Porter’s presentence report to avoid adverse collateral consequences involving his terms of confinement. Under these circumstances, Porter’s sentence shall continue to stand.

Given the unusual circumstances involved in this case and the lack of merit of Porter’s claim, the mandate shall issue forthwith.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### § 2413.3 Definition of meeting.

For purposes of this part, *meeting* shall mean the deliberations of at least two (2) members of the Authority where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official agency business, but does not include deliberations to determine whether a meeting should be closed to public observation in accordance with the provisions of this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Notice of Resource Advisory Committee, Sundance, Wyoming, USDA, Forest Service.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Black Hills National Forests' Crook County Resource Advisory Committee will meet Tuesday, January 20th, in Sundance, Wyoming for a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The business meeting on January 20, begins at 6:30 p.m., at the U.S. Forest Service, Bearlodge Ranger District office, 121 South 21st Street, Sundance, Wyoming. Agenda topics will include: Updates on previously funded projects and a review of proposals still needing action. A public forum will begin at 8:30 p.m. (m.t.).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Kozel, Bearlodge District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, at (307) 283-1361.

Dated: December 17, 2003.

Scott Tangenberg,

Bearlodge District Ranger.

[FR Doc. 04-246 Filed 1-5-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARTIN MAHON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1073

[ May 23, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Dennis D. Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 014767CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austi n , Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A.

Folley, Assistant Attorney Ge neral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §1130. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–186, §5(a), Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1283

Section, Pub. L. 89–454, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 94–461, §2, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1968; amended Pub. L. 95–428, §§2(b), 3(4), Oct. 7, 1978, 92 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 100–220, title III, §3109, Dec. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 1473, authorized grants for graduate programs in marine affairs and resource management during fiscal years 1988 through 1990.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 153 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 153

        To restore the second amendment rights of all Americans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To restore the second amendment rights of all Americans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Second Amendment Protection Act of 
2003''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF FEDERAL HARASSMENT PERIOD.

    Public Law 103-159 is hereby replaced, and any provisions of law 
amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act 
had not been enacted.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUN BAN.

    Title XI of Public Law 103-322 is hereby repealed, and any 
provisions of law amended or repealed by such title are restored or 
revived as if such title had not been enacted.

SEC. 4. REPEAL OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTION.

    (a) Section 201 of title 11 of Public Law 90-618 is amended by 
striking ``which the Secretary finds is generally recognized as 
particularly suitable for sporting purposes,'' and ``which the owner 
intends to use solely for sporting purposes.''
    (b) Public Law 90-351, as amended, is amended as follows:
            (1) In section 902, strike ``which the Secretary finds is 
        generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting 
        purposes,'' ``which the owner intends to use solely for 
        sporting, recreational, or cultural purposes,'' ``a projectile 
        which the Secretary finds is primarily intended to be used for 
        sporting purposes,'' ``devoted to the collection, competitive 
        use, or other sporting use of firearms in the community,'' 
        ``determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be 
        particularly suitable for sporting purposes and,'' ``(A) 
        determined by the Secretary to be generally recognized as 
        particularly suitable for sporting purposes, or determined by 
        the Department of Defense to be a type of firearm normally 
        classified as a war souvenir, and (B),'' ``and is generally 
        recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to 
        sporting purposes,'' and ``provided that such handguns are 
        generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily 
        adaptable to sporting purposes,''.
            (2) Strike ``lawful sporting purposes'' and insert in lieu 
        thereof ``lawful purposes''.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The provisions of this Act shall take effect immediately upon 
enactment.
                                 <all>
```
### [§335. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–525, title IV, §414(b)(2)(A), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2519]

Section, added Pub. L. 98–94, title V, §504(b)(1), Sept. 24, 1983, 97 Stat. 632, related to status of certain members of the National Guard performing full-time duty.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—CENTER FOR AUDIT EXCELLENCE
### §§71 to 84. Repealed. Oct. 11, 1951, ch. 495, §5, 65 Stat. 407

Section 71, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 321, provided that rules concerning lights be complied with from sunset to sunrise.

Section 72, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 321, related to lights of steam vessel under way.

Section 73, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 321, related to lights of vessel towing another vessel or vessels.

Section 74, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 322, related to lights and day signals of vessel not under control and of telegraph cable vessel.

Section 75, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 322, related to lights of sailing vessel under way and of vessel in tow.

Section 76, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 322, related to lights of small vessel under way in bad weather.

Section 77, acts Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 322; May 28, 1894, ch. 83, 28 Stat. 82, related to substitute lights for small vessel and rowing boats.

Section 78, acts Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 323; Feb. 19, 1900, ch. 22, §1, 31 Stat. 30, related to lights of pilot vessel on and off duty, and steam pilot vessel.

Section 79, acts Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 323; May 28, 1894, ch. 83, 28 Stat. 82; Jan. 19, 1907, ch. 300, §1, 34 Stat. 850, related to lights and day signals of fishing vessels and boats.

Section 80, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 324, related to lights on overtaken vessel.

Section 81, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 324, related to lights on vessel at anchor or aground.

Section 82, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 325, authorized additional lights and signals when necessary.

Section 83, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 325, related to special lights for ships of war and recognition signals.

Section 84, act Aug. 19, 1890, ch. 802, §1, 26 Stat. 325, related to day signal of steam vessel under sail.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1954, see note set out under sections 61 to 63 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 771 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 771

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2021

   Mr. Brown (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Warren, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
 Sanders, Mr. Cardin, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Van Hollen) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs 
Employee Fairness Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OF 
              EMPLOYEES OF THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 7422 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7768

CHARLES CARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ODIE WASHINGTON, Director, DC Department of Corrections; HULON L. WILLIS, Contract

Monitor for DC Department of Corrections;

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RONALD ANGELONE,

Director for Department of Corrections, Virginia; RUFUS FLEMING; EDDIE PEARSON, Chief

Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections;

DAVID B. EVERETT, Assistant Warden, Virginia

Department of Corrections; JAMILLA F. BURNEY;

HOUSTON SHIFLETT, Segregation Unit Manager,

Virginia Department of Corrections; IVAN T.

GILMORE, Major, Virginia Department of Corrections; KENNETH TURNER, Lieutenant, Virginia

Department of Corrections; SERGEANT BULLOCK,

Virginia Department of Corrections; LARRY

WYCHE, Sergeant, Virginia Department of

Corrections; MARVIN TRISVAN, Sergeant, Virginia Department of Corrections; R. ARFT,

Sergeant, Virginia Department of Corrections;

M. BROWN, Sergeant, Virginia Department of

Corrections; W. SKINNER, Sergeant, Virginia

Department of Corrections; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAWES, Virginia Department of Corrections;

C. SCOTT, Correctional Officer, Virginia

Department of Corrections; ELLESWORTH C.

MURRAY, Institutional Investigator, Virginia

Department of Corrections; J. K. VAUGHAN, SR.,

Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Virginia Depart
2

ment of Corrections; ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Mayor

of District of Columbia; MARGARET MOORE,

Former Director, DC Department Of Corrections;

CALVIN EDWARDS; ADRIENNE POTEAT, Temporary

Acting Director, DC Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-00-631-2)

Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Card, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Charles Card appeals from a district court order dismissing

without prejudice his complaint alleging civil rights violations

under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). The court dismissed Card’s complaint because he failed to pay his filing fee as

directed or properly certify that he could not pay such a fee.

Because Card may proceed with this action in the district court by

amending his complaint to provide the information requested by the

court, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate

review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,

10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED