alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2906. Monitoring of estuary habitat restoration projects

#### (a) Under Secretary

In this section, the term "Under Secretary" means the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of the Department of Commerce.

#### (b) Database of restoration project information

The Under Secretary, in consultation with the Council, shall develop and maintain an appropriate database of information concerning estuary habitat restoration projects carried out under this chapter, including information on project techniques, project completion, monitoring data, and other relevant information.

#### (c) Monitoring data standards

The Under Secretary, in consultation with the Council, shall develop standard data formats for monitoring projects, along with requirements for types of data collected and frequency of monitoring.

#### (d) Coordination of data

The Under Secretary shall have general data compilation, coordination, and analysis responsibilities to carry out this chapter and in support of the strategy developed under this section, including compilation of information that pertains to estuary habitat restoration projects from other Federal, State, and local sources and that meets the quality control requirements and data standards established under this section.

#### (e) Use of existing programs

The Under Secretary shall use existing programs within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to create and maintain the database required under this section.

#### (f) Public availability

The Under Secretary shall make the information collected and maintained under this section available to the public.

(Pub. L. 106–457, title I, §107, Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 1964; Pub. L. 110–114, title V, §5017(e), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1198.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 110–114 substituted "have general data compilation, coordination, and analysis responsibilities to carry out this chapter and in support of the strategy developed under this section, including compilation of" for "compile".
Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries



|                                                    |  |                       |  |                               |  |               |          |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ------------- | -------- | -
|Legal Name                                          |  | Place ofIncorporation |  | Doing Business As             |  | Ownership 
%1 |         
|Lan Argentina S.A.                                  |  | Argentina             |  | Lan Argentina                 |  |               | 94,99    | %
|Aerolinhas Brasileras S.A.                          |  | Brazil                |  | ABSA                          |  |               | 73.3326  | %
|Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica S.A.                       |  | Chile                 |  | Inmobiliaria Aeronáutica      |  |               | 100,00   | %
|Inversiones Lan S.A.                                |  | Chile                 |  | Inverlan                      |  |               | 99.71    | %
|Lan Cargo S.A.                                      |  | Chile                 |  | Lan ChileCargo                |  |               | 99.8990  | %
|Lan Pax Group S.A.                                  |  | Chile                 |  | Lan Pax Group                 |  |               | 100      | %
|Transporte Aéreo S.A.                               |  | Chile                 |  | LanExpress                    |  |               | 99,.8990 | %
|Aerolane, Líneas Aéreas Nacionales del Ecuador S.A. |  | Ecuador               |  | Lan Ecuador                   |  |               | 71.95    | %
|Aerotransporte Mas de Carga S.A.                    |  | Mexico                |  | Mas Air                       |  |               | 69.1508  | %
|Lan Perú S.A.                                       |  | Peru                  |  | Lan Perú                      |  |               | 7069.98  | %
|Lantours División Servicios Terrestres SA           |  | Chile                 |  | Comercial MasterhouseLantours |  |               | 100      | %
|Línea Aérea Carguera de Colombia S.A.               |  | Colombia              |  | LANCO                         |  |               | 89.90    | %
|Aerovías de Integración Regional S.A.               |  | Colombia              |  | AiresLan Colombia             |  |               | 98.2221  | %



|1 | Percentage of equity owned by Lan Airlines S.A. directly or indirectly through subsidiaries or affiliates
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Ambient Corporation on Form S-8 (No. 333-112569) of our report dated February 3,
2006 with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
Ambient Corporation and its Subsidiaries as at and for the years ended December
31, 2005 and 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph related to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern) which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



/s/ Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C.
Saddle Brook NJ
February 24, 2006
<PAGE>


                                                                       EXHIBIT 3
                                                             Consent of KPMG LLP



                                [KPMG LETTERHEAD]




The Board of Directors
Royal Group Technologies Limited

We consent to inclusion in the Form 40-F of the Company of our report dated
November 18, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as
at September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years
ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002.



/s/ KPMG LLP
--------------------------------
Chartered Accountants
Toronto, Canada

February 16, 2004
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-031 April 10, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC WITHDRAWS CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST PA.-BASED MEDICAL FIRM;

TERMINATES COMPANY’S LICENSE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has withdrawn a civil penalty issued in February to

an Allentown-based company. The company, Medical Provider’s Capital Network, had been cited for

three violations of NRC requirements on February 11. At that time, the agency had proposed a $3,000

fine. 

Medical Providers Capital Network had an NRC license that allowed it to use certain nuclear

materials to perform diagnostic tests, such as heart and organ imaging, at facilities in Allentown and in

Lakewood, N.J. Based on its reviews, in February, the NRC staff cited the facility for the following

violations: a failure of its Radiation Safety Officer/Authorized User to perform monthly visits to the

Lakewood facility to review the use of radioactive materials between March 2000 and December 2001,

even though it was known this was required; the creation of false records indicating that the Radiation

Safety Officer/authorized user had visited the Lakewood facility on a monthly basis during that period

when that had not, in fact, occurred; and the receipt, possession and use of radioactive material without

the supervision of a Radiation Safety Officer/Authorized User between January 14 and March 4, 2002.

In its response to the February citation, the company stated it was planning to terminate its

license and requested the fine be mitigated. Medical Providers Capital Network subsequently

submitted a termination request to NRC. Since the NRC has terminated the company’s license, the

NRC also has agreed to withdraw the civil penalty. 

###
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 14, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Automotive Glass Replacement Safety Standards Council (“AGRSS”) has filed notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Automotive Glass Replacement Safety Standards Council, Glen Ellyn, IL. The nature and scope of AGRSS' standards development activities are: To develop, publish and maintain nationally recognized automotive glass replacement safety and related standards. At a minimum, these standards will address procedures, education and product performance for the purpose of enhancing public safety.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24564  Filed 11-02-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### § 319.106 Suitability inquiries regarding criminal history.

Agency inquiries regarding criminal history must be done in accordance with the requirements under chapter 92 of title 5, U.S. Code and part 920 of this chapter.

[88 FR 60329, Sept. 1, 2023]
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Repros Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph S.
Podolski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
      9, 2010
              By: /s/ Joseph S.
  PodolskiJoseph
      S. PodolskiChief
      Executive OfficerRepros
      Therapeutics Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Repros and will be retained by Repros and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 250.302 Survey requirements.

(a) Each executive agency must conduct an annual survey of its employees to assess topics outlined in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004, Public Law 108-136, sec. 1128, codified at 5 U.S.C. 7101.

(1) Each executive agency may include additional survey questions unique to the agency in addition to the employee survey questions prescribed by OPM under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(2) The 16 prescribed survey questions are listed in the following table:

| **(i) Leadership and Management practices that contribute to agency performance** |
| --- |
| | My work unit has the job-relevant skills necessary to accomplish organizational goals. |
| | Managers communicate the goals of the organization. |
| | I believe the results of this survey will be used to make my agency a better place to work. |
| **(ii) Employee Satisfaction with**— |
| (A) | Leadership Policies and Practices: |
| | How satisfied are you with your involvement in decisions that affect your work? |
| | How satisfied are you with the information you receive from management on what is going on in your organization? |
| | Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your organization? |
| (B) | Work Environment: |
| | The people I work with cooperate to get the job done. |
| | My workload is reasonable. |
| | Considering everything, how satisfied are you with your job? |
| | I can disclose a suspected violation of any law, rule or regulation without fear of reprisal. |
| (C) | Rewards and Recognition: |
| | In my work unit, differences in performance are recognized in a meaningful way. |
| | How satisfied are you with the recognition you receive for doing a good job? |
| (D) | Opportunities for professional development and growth: |
| | I am given a real opportunity to improve my skills in my organization. |
| | My talents are used well in the workplace. |
| (E) | Opportunity to contribute to achieving organizational mission: |
| | I know how my work relates to the agency's goals. |
| | I recommend my organization as a good place to work. |
#### § 212.28 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final Commission determinations on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
### §630. Limitation on expenditure for purchase of dredges

No money authorized to be expended for the acquirement of any dredge or dredges shall be so expended for the purchase of any dredge or dredges from private contractors, which at the time of the proposed purchase can be manufactured at any navy yard or other government-owned factory for a sum less than it can be purchased for from such private contractor.

(Sept. 22, 1922, ch. 427, §5, 42 Stat. 1042.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from part of section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act for 1922.

The omitted portion of that section authorized the construction of six seagoing hopper dredges and limited the cost of each to $750,000.
### §564. Repealed. July 3, 1943, ch. 189, §5, 57 Stat. 374

Section, acts June 25, 1910, ch. 382, §4, 36 Stat. 676; June 5, 1920, ch. 252, §9, 41 Stat. 1015, related to settlement of claims for injury to or loss of private property.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—STATE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUNDS
### §9501. Purpose

The purpose of this chapter is to protect the interests of the United States and of the participants and their beneficiaries in Government pension plans by requiring complete disclosure of the financial condition of those plans.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1050.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 9501 | 31:68. | Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, 64 Stat. 832, §120; added Nov. 4, 1978, Pub. L. 95–595, §1, 92 Stat. 2541. |

The words "United States" are substituted for "Nation" for clarity and consistency. The words "and certain other pension plans" are omitted as unnecessary.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 4.2


NANOSIGNAL CORP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 560
Las Vegas, NV 89109

                                                               February 17, 2004

RE:      S-8 PAYMENT UNDER TERMS OF WRITTEN
         CONTRACT - DIRECTOR AND PRESIDENT


Dear Mr. Quintana:

This shall  confirm our  agreement to issue to you S-8 shares under the terms of
your written  Invoice #2993 dated February 4, 2004 with the Company for one year
pre-paid printing,  brochures,  post cards, and design services through December
31, 2004.

The compensation due is equivalent to FOUR MILLION (4,000,000) shares of common
stock to be issued to

                                  K.C. Quintana

Please confirm your  acceptance of these terms below as indicated.  Your telefax
copy  should  be sent to us with  the  original  signed  copy  delivered  to our
corporate offices at your earliest convenience.


Very truly yours,

ANNALIE GALICIA

By: /s/ Annalie Galacia
    Annalie Galicia, Secretary-Treasurer

AG:jd


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO

K.C. Quintana

By: /s/ KC Quintana                        Dated: February 17, 2004
    K.C. Quintana
#### § 293.302 Establishment of Official Personnel Folder.

Each agency shall establish an Official Personnel Folder (OPF) for each employee occupying a position subject to this part, except as provided in § 293.306. Except as provided in the Guide to Personnel Recordkeeping, there will be only one OPF maintained for each employee regardless of service in various agencies.

[50 FR 3309, Jan. 24, 1985, as amended at 66 FR 66709, Dec. 27, 2001]
June 15, 2006 

MEMORANDUM TO: Luis A. Reyes 

Executive Director for Operations 

FROM: Stephen D. Dingbaum /RA/ 

Assistant Inspector General for Audits 

SUBJECT: STATUS OF RECOMMENDATIONS: AUDIT OF NRC 

BASELINE INSPECTION PROGRAM (OIG-05-A-06) 

REFERENCE: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR 

REGULATION, MEMORANDUM DATED MAY 24, 2006 

Attached is the Office of the Inspector General’s (OIG) analysis and status of 

recommendations as discussed in the agency’s response dated May 24, 2006. Based 

on this updated response, recommendations 3 and 4 are now closed. 

Recommendation 2 remains in a resolved status. Recommendation 2 will be closed 

when OIG receives information confirming that corrective action has been completed. 

Please provide an updated status of recommendation 2 by September 15, 2006. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 415-5915. 

Attachment: Status of Recommendations 

 cc: W. Dean, OEDO 

M. Malloy, OEDO 

P. Tressler, OEDO 
Audit Report 

Audit of NRC Baseline Inspection Program 

OIG-05-A-06 

Status of Open Recommendations 

Recommendation 2: Develop guidance on how to identify human performance trends and how 

that information should be integrated into the reactor oversight process 

(ROP). 

Agency’s Updated Response 

Of May 24, 2006: 

 

OIG Analysis: Based on the agency’s response and the additional discussion with NRR 

staff at a May 10, 2006 meeting, OIG agrees that progress continues to 

be made to bring this recommendation to closure. OIG will close this 

recommendation when the proposed actions are complete. 

Status: Resolved. 
Audit Report 

Audit of NRC Baseline Inspection Program 

OIG-05-A-06 

Status of Open Recommendations 

Recommendation 3: Develop and implement guidance for documenting, tracking, and trending 

informal inspection issues. 

Agency’s Updated Response 

Of May 24, 2006: 

 

 

OIG Analysis: At a meeting on May 10, 2006, NRR staff provided OIG with copies of 

revisions to IMC 2515, “Light-Water Reactor Inspection program – 

Operations Phase,” effective 11/28/05 and IMC 0102, “Oversight and 

Objectivity of Inspectors and Examiners at Reactor Facilities,” effective 

8/22/05. Upon OIG review, the agency’s completed revisions to these 

guidance documents satisfy the actions necessary to fulfill this 

recommendation. Therefore, recommendation 3 is now closed. 

Status: Closed. 
Audit Report 

Audit of NRC Baseline Inspection Program 

OIG-05-A-06 

Status of Open Recommendations 

Recommendation 4: Define “effectiveness” as it pertains to the ROP and establish 

performance measures and targets to demonstrate that the baseline 

inspection program meets that definition. 

Agency’s Updated Response 

Of May 24, 2006: 

 

OIG Analysis: At a meeting on May 10, 2006, NRR staff provided OIG with a copy of 

revised IMC 0307, “Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment 

Program,” effective 2/20/06. Upon OIG review, the agency’s completed 

revisions meet the intent of this recommendation. Therefore, 

recommendation 4 is now closed. 

Status: Closed.
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.402 Tenure on reinstatement. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a person who is reinstated becomes a career-conditional employee.
( b ) A person who is reinstated becomes a career employee when he has completed the service requirement for career tenure or is excepted from it by § 315.201(c).