alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GATEWAY 2000,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         401,126
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (18,561)
<INVENTORY>                                    210,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,082,089
<PP&E>                                         402,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,416,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          622,570
<BONDS>                                         12,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           767
<OTHER-SE>                                     724,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,416,562
<SALES>                                      3,482,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,482,398
<CGS>                                        2,821,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,821,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                248,146
<INCOME-TAX>                                    85,610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            162,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   162,536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
### §1323. Distribution of fellowships

In awarding fellowships under the provisions of this subchapter, the Secretary of Energy shall endeavor to provide equitable distribution of such fellowships throughout the Nation, except that the Secretary of Energy shall give special attention to institutions of higher education, libraries, archives, or other research centers which have a demonstrated capacity to offer courses of study or research in the field of energy resources and conservation and conversion and related disciplines. In carrying out his responsibilities under this section, the Secretary of Energy shall take into consideration the projected need for highly trained engineers and scientists in the field of energy sources.

(Pub. L. 95–87, title IX, §903, Aug. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 530; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), title VII, §§703, 707, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 606, 607.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Administrator", meaning Administrator of Energy Research and Development Administration, pursuant to sections 301(a), 703, and 707 of Pub. L. 95–91, which are classified to sections 7151(a), 7293, 7297 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and which terminated Energy Research and Development Administration and transferred its functions and functions of Administrator thereof (with certain exceptions) to Secretary of Energy.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-121 September 1, 2005

NRC ISSUES MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENTS FOR ALL NUCLEAR PLANTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued mid-cycle assessment letters for 103 operating

nuclear power plants and posted them to its Web site. 

The letters show that U.S. commercial nuclear power plants continue to operate safely. Every

six months each plant receives either a mid-cycle review letter or an annual assessment letter along

with an NRC inspection plan. Updated information on plant performance is posted to the NRC Web

site every quarter. The next annual assessment letters will be issued in March 2006.

The assessment letters for each plant will be available on the NRC Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/listofasmrpt.html and through ADAMS, the

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System. Help in using ADAMS is available from

the NRC Public Document Room by calling (301) 415-4737 or (800) 397-4209.

###
###### Editorial Note on Part 315

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

#### § 315.503 Acquisition of competitive status.

An employee who was serving probation when he was appointed under § 315.501 acquires a competitive status automatically on completion of probation.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-034 March 14, 2006

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NUCLEAR WASTE

TO MEET IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND, MARCH 22-24

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will

meet March 22-24 in Rockville, Md., to continue to discuss, among other things, the U.S. Department

of Energy’s research on the performance of the proposed Yucca Mountain repository, including recent

developments related to modeling igneous activity. The committee will also review public comments

on nuclear facility decommissioning guidance.

The committee reports to and advises the Commission on all aspects of nuclear waste

management.

The session on Wednesday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. and the session on Thursday

will run from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The session on Friday will run from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The

meeting will be held in Room O-1G16 of the agency’s One White Flint North Building, at 11555

Rockville Pike.

A complete agenda will be available on the NRC’s Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acnw/agenda/2006/ . Individuals interesting in making

statements or those seeking more information should contact Michael Lee, at 301-415-6887. 

###
### §2135. Private studios and works of art

No room in the Capitol shall be used for private studios or works of art, without permission from the Joint Committee on the Library, given in writing; and it shall be the duty of the Architect of the Capitol to carry this provision into effect.

(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, 18 Stat. 376.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was classified to section 190 of former Title 40, prior to the enactment of Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, by Pub. L. 107–217, §1, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               30,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     69,922
<PP&E>                                              248,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                       51,478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      506,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,088,982
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              2,419
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,637,340)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        506,526
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,432,815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,432,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,432,815)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,432,815)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.61)
       



</TABLE>
§ 2423.1 Can a Regional Office help the parties resolve unfair labor practice disputes before a Regional Director decides whether to issue a complaint? ( a ) *Resolving unfair labor practice disputes before filing a charge.* The purposes and policies of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (Statute) can best be achieved by the collaborative efforts of all persons covered by that law. The General Counsel encourages all persons to meet and, in good faith, attempt to resolve unfair labor practice disputes before filing unfair labor practice charges. If requested, and the parties agree, a representative of the Regional Office, in appropriate circumstances, may participate in these meetings to assist the parties to identify the issues and their interests and to resolve the dispute. Parties' attempts to resolve unfair labor practice disputes before filing an unfair labor practice charge do not toll the time limitations for filing a charge set forth at 5 U.S.C. 7118(a)(4).
( b ) *Resolving unfair labor practice disputes after filing a charge.* The General Counsel encourages the informal resolution of unfair labor practice allegations after a charge is filed and before the Regional Director makes a merit determination. A representative of the appropriate Regional Office, as part of the investigation, may assist the parties in informally resolving their dispute.
Exhibit 13.1

Officer Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Lan Airlines S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                  
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Dated: June 25, 2009 |  | /s/ Enrique Cueto Plaza          
|                     |  | Name: Enrique Cueto Plaza        
|                     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer   
|                     | 
|Dated: June 25, 2009 |  | /s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic  
|                     |  | Name: Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
|                     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 365

EX PA R TE JO SE ZAM A R R I PA A LV A R A D O , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 0 0 8 CRS 5 8 9 - D4 I N T HE 4 0 6 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM W EBB CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 18 S.W. 2d

82 4, 82 6 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 67 ). Ap pli c ant w a s c on vic te d o f ind e c e nc y wi th a child and sente nced to eleve ny ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant conte nds, inte r a lia , that his counsel re ndere d ineffe ctive assistanc e bec ause he fa i l edt o t i m el y

fi l e an o t i ce o f ap p ea l
. W e re m an d ed th i s ap p l i ca t i o n t o th e tri al co urt fo r f i n d i n gs of fa ct and c onclusions of law. T h e tr ia l c o u rt ha s d e te r

mi n e d th a t t

r ia l c o un s e l f

a il e d to ti me ly f il e a n o ti c e o f a p p e a l. We2

find, there fore , that Applica n t is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time appe al of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 20 0 8 C R S 5 8 9 -D4 from the 406th J udicial District Court of Webb County . Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of
a pp e a l so that he may

the n, wi th t

he a id o f co un se l, obt a in a me anin g fu l app e a l. Al l ti me lim its sh a ll be ca lculated a s if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the d at e on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a wr itten notice of ap p ea l in the trial court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court iss ue s.

Deliver ed: J une 16, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
H. R. 1648

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain water distribution

systems of the Cachuma Project, California, to the Carpinteria Valley Water

District and the Montecito Water District.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carpinteria and Montecito Water

Distribution Systems Conveyance Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS OF THE

CACHUMA PROJECT, CALIFORNIA.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior—

(1) may convey to the Carpinteria Valley Water District,

located in Santa Barbara County, California, all right, title,

and interest of the United States in and to the Carpinteria

Distribution System of the Cachuma Project, California, consistent with the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement

entitled ‘‘Agreement Between the United States and the

Carpinteria Valley Water District to Transfer Title to the Federally Owned Distribution System to the Carpinteria Valley

Water District’’ (Agreement No. 00–XC–20–0364); and

(2) may convey to the Montecito Water District, located

in Santa Barbara County, California, all right, title, and

interest of the United States in and to the Montecito Water

Distribution System of the Cachuma Project, California, consistent with the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement

entitled ‘‘Agreement Between the United States and the

Montecito Water District to Transfer Title to the Federally

Owned Distribution System to the Montecito Water District’’

(Agreement No. 01–XC–20–0365).

(b) LIABILITY.—Effective upon the date of conveyance of a distribution system under this section, the United States shall not

be held liable by any court for damages of any kind arising out

of any act, omission, or occurrence relating to the distribution

system, except for damages caused by acts of negligence committed

by the United States or by its employees or agents prior to the

date of conveyance. Nothing in this section increases the liability

of the United States beyond that provided in chapter 171 of title

28, United States Code (popularly known as the Federal Tort Claims

Act) on the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) BENEFITS.—After conveyance of a water distribution system

to the Carpinteria Valley Water District or the Montecito Water

District under this section—
H. R. 1648—2

(1) such water distribution system shall not be considered

to be a part of a Federal reclamation project; and

(2) such water district shall not be eligible to receive any

benefits with respect to any facility comprising that distribution

system, except benefits that would be available to a similarly

situated person with respect to such a facility that is not

part of a Federal reclamation project.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-107 September 7, 2004

NRC RELEASES YORK, PA., SITE

FOR UNRESTRICTED USE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has granted the request of Molycorp, Inc., to terminate its

license to possess radioactive material at a former chemical manufacturing plant near York, Pa., and

released the site for unrestricted use.

The company used ores containing low levels of radioactive material as feedstock in the

chemical manufacturing process.

“Molycorp has completed site decommissioning and post-decommissioning groundwater

monitoring of the site as set out in its NRC-approved decommissioning plan, and the land is now safe

for other uses,” said Daniel M. Gillen, Deputy Director for the Decommissioning Directorate, NRC

Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection. “We have verified this assessment

through independent radiation surveys by the NRC and its contractor.”

 The property is located in Spring Garden Township just outside York city limits. It occupies

approximately 6 acres bounded by North Sherman Street to the east, Olive Street to the north, Hudson

Street to the west and the active Norfolk and Southern Railroad line to the south. In a January 1993

letter to the NRC, Molycorp announced that all operations using NRC-licensed material at the York

site had ceased.

All buildings on the site have been decontaminated and removed, and surface and subsurface

soils have been remediated. Based on these actions taken by the licensee, the staff’s review of the

licensee’s radiation surveys, and the results of the staff’s confirmatory surveys, the NRC concluded that

the licensee has completed the decommissioning activities in accordance with its approved

decommissioning plan, and the site is suitable for unrestricted release.

The NRC published a notice of the company’s proposed license termination in the Federal

Register on February 26, 2001, and offered an opportunity to request a hearing. No requests for a

hearing were received. 

Molycorp is still actively cleaning up another former chemical manufacturing facility, located

in Washington, Pa. 

###
#### Woodlark Construction Corp., Appellant, v. William E. Callahan, Respondent.

*858In our opinion the proof adduced sustains the conclusion reached by the Special Term that the contract, as drawn, expressed the intention of the parties, and sustains the construction of the contract as requiring that a commitment be obtained from the F. H. A. as a condition precedent, which was for the benefit of both parties. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
|  |     **Product reviews**    **Shopping**    **Tech news**    **Downloads** |  |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|  |                                                                                                                                                           |
|  |  |  |  All CNET    The Web |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|-----------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
#### § 2429.3 Transfer of record.

In any case under part 2425 of this subchapter, upon request by the Authority, the parties jointly shall transfer the record in the case, including a copy of the transcript, if any, exhibits, briefs and other documents filed with the arbitrator, to the Authority.
§ 2610.201 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall further state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business. The application shall also: ( 1 ) Show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of the Office in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified; or
( 2 ) Show that the demand by the Office in the proceeding was substantially in excess of, and was unreasonable when compared with, the decision in the proceeding.
( b ) The application shall also include, for purposes of § 2610.106 (a) or (b), a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $2,000,000 (for individuals) or $7,000,000 (for all other applicants, including their affiliates) or alternatively, for purposes of § 2610.106(b) only, a declaration that the applicant is a small entity as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601. However, an applicant may omit the statement concerning its net worth if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Office to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification made by the applicant or authorized officer or attorney of the applicant under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
( f ) These collections of information are not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) because they are expected to involve nine or fewer persons each year.
[57 FR 33268, July 28, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 34755, July 7, 1994; 63 FR 13116, Mar. 18, 1998]