# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 0016 V (not to be published)

LAUREN WOOD

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: November 20, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for P etitioner.

Wei Kit Tai , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY ’ S FEES AND COSTS 1

On January 3, 2019

, Lauren Wood filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered right shoulder injuries and brachial
neuritis caused in fact by the influenza vaccine she received on September Oct ober 3,

2016

. ( Petition at ¶¶ 2, 19

- 20 )

. On September 23, 2020

, a decision was issued awarding
compensation to P etitioner based on the parties’ stipulation

. (ECF No. 31 )

.

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 Petitioner has now filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs, dated November 3,

2020

, (ECF No. 36 ) , requesting a total award of $ 16,908.39 (representing $ 15,844.80 in
fees and $ 1,063.59 in costs). In accordance with General Order #9 , counsel for Petitioner
represents that Petitioner incurred no out

- of

- pocket expenses. ( Id . at 2). Respondent

reacted to the motion on November 17, 2020 indicating that he is satisfied that the
statutory requirements for an award of attorney’s fees and costs are met in this case and

defers to the Court’s discretion to determine the amount to be awarded. (ECF No. 37).

On November 1 8 , 2020, through email co rrespondence, counsel for Petitioner informed
the staff attorneys office that Petitioner did not intend to file a reply. See Informal Remark,

November 19, 2020.

I have reviewed the billing records submitted with P etitioner’s request. In my experience , the request appears reasonable, and I find no cause to reduce the requested

hours or rates.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorney ’ s fees and costs

. §
15(e). Accordingly, I hereby GRANT Petitioner’s Motion for attorney ’ s fees and costs. I

award a total of $ 16,908.39 (representing $ 15,844.80 in fees and $ 1,063.59 in costs) as
a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel

. In the absence of a timely

- filed motion for review (see Appendix B to the Rules of the
Court), the Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this dec ision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their right to seek review.