alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §558. Proceeds from sale or transfer of property acquired

When any property which has been heretofore or may be hereafter purchased or acquired for the improvement of rivers and harbors is no longer needed, or is no longer serviceable and is transferred or sold, the proceeds thereof may be credited to the appropriation for the work for which it was acquired.

(June 13, 1902, ch. 1079, §5, 32 Stat. 373; Feb. 20, 1931, ch. 235, 46 Stat. 1191; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §4(4), 65 Stat. 709.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section originally began with the words "when any land or other" preceding "property". The words, "land or other", were deleted on the basis of act February 20, 1931, which provided, "that hereafter no real estate of the War Department shall be sold or disposed of without authority of Congress, and all existing Acts or parts thereof in conflict with this proviso, other than special Acts for the sale of stated tracts of land, are hereby repealed."

Section is from the first part of section 5 of act June 13, 1902, which was a provision of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act for 1902. The last part of such section 5 is set out as section 631 of this title.

#### Amendments

1951—Act Oct. 31, 1951, struck out provisions authorizing the Secretary of the Army to sell the unserviceable property referred to, and authorizing him to direct the transfer of any property employed in river and harbor works; struck out the provision that the property so transferred should be valued and credited to the project upon which it was theretofore used and charged to the project to which it was transferred; and inserted "and is transferred or sold, the proceeds thereof may be credited to the appropriation for the work for which it was acquired".
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

[RR83550000, 190R5065C6, RX.59389832.1009676]


Change in Discount Rate for Water Resources Planning

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of change in discount rate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is announcing the interest rate to 
be used by Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation of plans 
for water and related land resources is 2.875 percent for fiscal year 
2019.

DATES: This discount rate is to be used for the period October 1, 2018, 
through and including September 30, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. DeShawn Woods, Bureau of 
Reclamation, Reclamation Law Administration Division, P.O. Box 25007, 
Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone 303-445-2900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 and 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 require an annual 
determination of a discount rate for Federal water resources planning. 
The discount rate for Federal water resources planning for fiscal year 
2019 is 2.875 percent. Discounting is to be used to convert future 
monetary values to present values.
    This rate has been computed in accordance with Section 80(a), 
Public Law 93-251 (88 Stat. 34), and 18 CFR 704.39, which: (1) Specify 
that the rate will be based upon the average yield during the preceding 
fiscal year on interest-bearing marketable securities of the United 
States which, at the time the computation is made, have terms of 15 
years or more remaining to maturity (average yield is rounded to 
nearest one-eighth percent); and (2) provide that the rate will not be 
raised or lowered more than one-quarter of 1 percent for any year. The 
U.S. Department of the Treasury calculated the specified average to be 
2.9176 percent. This rate, rounded to the nearest one-eighth percent, 
is 2.875 percent, which is a change of less than the allowable one-
quarter of 1 percent. Therefore, the fiscal year 2019 rate is 2.875 
percent.
    The rate of 2.875 percent will be used by all Federal agencies in 
the formulation and evaluation of water and related land resources 
plans for the purpose of discounting future benefits and computing 
costs or otherwise converting benefits and costs to a common-time 
basis.

    Dated: December 11, 2018.
Karl Stock,
Acting Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018-27331 Filed 12-17-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4332-90-P
§ 2641.207 One-year restriction on any former private sector assignee under the Information Technology Exchange Program representing, aiding, counseling or assisting in representing in connection with any contract with former agency. ( a ) *Basic prohibition of 18 U.S.C. 207(l) .* For one year after the termination of his assignment from a private sector organization to an agency under the Information Technology Exchange Program, 5 U.S.C. chapter 37, no former assignee shall knowingly represent, or aid, counsel or assist in representing any other person in connection with any contract with that agency.
( b ) *Exceptions and waivers.* The prohibition of 18 U.S.C. 207(l) does not apply to a former employee who is: ( 1 ) Acting on behalf of the United States. *See* § 2641.301(a).
( 2 ) Acting as an elected State or local government official. *See* § 2641.301(b).
( 3 ) Testifying under oath. *See* § 2641.301(f).
( 4 ) Acting on behalf of an international organization pursuant to a waiver. *See* § 2641.301(h).
( 5 ) Acting as an employee of a Government-owned, contractor-operated entity pursuant to a waiver. *See* § 2641.301(i).
( c ) *Commencement and length of restriction.* 18 U.S.C. 207(l) is a one-year restriction. The one-year period is measured from the date when the individual's assignment under the Information Technology Exchange Program terminates.
( d ) *Represent, aid, counsel, or assist in representing.* [Reserved]
( e ) *In connection with any contract with the former agency.* [Reserved]
### §1291. Sewage collection systems

#### (a) Existing and new systems

No grant shall be made for a sewage collection system under this subchapter unless such grant (1) is for replacement or major rehabilitation of an existing collection system and is necessary to the total integrity and performance of the waste treatment works servicing such community, or (2) is for a new collection system in an existing community with sufficient existing or planned capacity adequately to treat such collected sewage and is consistent with section 1281 of this title.

#### (b) Use of population density as test

If the Administrator uses population density as a test for determining the eligibility of a collector sewer for assistance it shall be only for the purpose of evaluating alternatives and determining the needs for such system in relation to ground or surface water quality impact.

#### (c) Pollutant discharges from separate storm sewer systems

No grant shall be made under this subchapter from funds authorized for any fiscal year during the period beginning October 1, 1977, and ending September 30, 1990, for treatment works for control of pollutant discharges from separate storm sewer systems.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 843; amended Pub. L. 95–217, §36, Dec. 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 1581; Pub. L. 97–117, §2(b), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1623; Pub. L. 100–4, title II, §206(d), Feb. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 20.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1987—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–4 substituted "1990" for "1985".

1981—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–117 substituted "September 30, 1985" for "September 30, 1982".

1977—Pub. L. 95–217 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS      (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF **

**TITLE      18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

|                                               |   |   |                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |   |   |                                                                                        |
| Date:              February 14              , 2007 |   |   | /s/              Robert              Ellin                                                  |
|                                                    |   |   | Robert              Ellin, Chief Executive Officer                                          |
|                                               |   |   |                                                                                        |
|                                               |   |   |                                                                                        |
| Date: February 14, 2007                            |   |   | /s/ Jay Wolf                                                                                |
|                                                    |   |   | Jay                Wolf, Chief Operating Officer and Chief                Financial Officer |

----
#### § 1651.13 How to apply for a death benefit.

To apply for a TSP death benefit, a potential beneficiary must contact the ThriftLine for instructions on providing a certified copy of the participant's death certificate, along with any other information as required by the TSP.

[87 FR 31686, May 24, 2022]
### §1420. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated, for purposes of carrying out this subchapter, not to exceed $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1993 and not to exceed $14,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 92–532, title I, §111, Oct. 23, 1972, 86 Stat. 1060; Pub. L. 93–472, Oct. 26, 1974, 88 Stat. 1430; Pub. L. 94–62, §1, July 25, 1975, 89 Stat. 303; Pub. L. 94–326, §1, June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 725; Pub. L. 95–153, §1, Nov. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 1255; Pub. L. 96–572, §1, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3344; Pub. L. 97–16, June 23, 1981, 95 Stat. 100; Pub. L. 100–536, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2710; Pub. L. 102–580, title V, §509(a), Oct. 31, 1992, 106 Stat. 4870.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–580 substituted "for fiscal year 1993 and not to exceed $14,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, to remain available until expended" for "for each of fiscal years 1989, 1990, and 1991".

1988—Pub. L. 100–536 amended section generally, substituting provisions authorizing appropriations not to exceed $12,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1989, 1990, and 1991, for provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal years 1973 to 1982.

1981—Pub. L. 97–16 increased to $4,213,000 from $2,000,000 the authorization of appropriation for fiscal year 1982.

1980—Pub. L. 96–572 inserted provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal years 1980, 1981, and 1982.

1977—Pub. L. 95–153 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $4,800,000 for fiscal year 1978.

1976—Pub. L. 94–326 inserted provision authorizing appropriations not to exceed $4,800,000 for fiscal year 1977.

1975—Pub. L. 94–62 substituted "not to exceed $5,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 1974 and 1975" for "and not to exceed $5,500,000 for fiscal years 1974 and 1975", and inserted provisions authorizing appropriation of an amount not to exceed $5,300,000 for fiscal year 1976, and not to exceed $1,325,000 for the transition period (July 1 through Sept. 30, 1976).

1974—Pub. L. 93–472 substituted "fiscal years 1974 and 1975," for "fiscal year 1974,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 6 months after Oct. 23, 1972, see section 110(a) of Pub. L. 92–532, set out as a note under section 1411 of this title.
11-i CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE CO ST SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 11-111-1 CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SU BGROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 INTRODUCTION

The life-cycle cost (LCC) subgroup analysis ev aluates impacts on any identifiable groups or consumers who may be disproportionately affected by any nati onal energy conservation standard level. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will conduct this analysis as one of the analyses for the notice of proposed rulemaking. DOE will accomplish this, in part, by analyzing the LCC and payback periods (PBPs) for those co nsumers that fall into any identifiable groups. DOE plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices and variations in energy use that might affect the net present value of a standa rd to consumer subpopulations. To the extent possible, DOE will obtain estimates of each input parameter’s variability and will consider this variability in its calculation of consumer impact s. DOE plans to perform sensitivity analyses to consider how differences in energy us e will affect subgroups of consumers.

DOE will determine the impact on consumer subgroups using the LCC Spreadsheet Model, which allows for different data inputs. Th e standard LCC analysis (described in chapter 8) focuses on the households that use room air conditioners and clothes dryers. DOE can use the LCC Spreadsheet Model to analyze the LCC for any subgroup by sampling only that subgroup. (Chapter 8 explains in detail the inputs to the model used in determining LCC and PBPs.)

In the case of room air conditioners and clothes dryers, possible subgroups DOE may choose to consider are: (1) low-income households, and (2) senior citizens.

DOE does not apply a rebound effect in th e LCC subgroup analysis for the reasons discussed in chapter 8 (i.e., there is no net change in overall consumer benefit with or without the rebound effect).

DOE will be especially sensitiv e to increases in the purchas e price of the product due to new standards, to avoid negative impacts on identif iable population groups that may not be able to afford significant increases in product price. For such consumers that are sensitive to price increases, increases in first co sts of a product can preclude the pur chase of a new model of that product. As a result, some consumers may retain products past their us eful life. These older products are generally less efficien t to begin with, and their effici ency may deteriorate further if they are retained beyond their us eful life. Increases in first co st also can preclude the purchase and use of a product altogether, re sulting in a potentially large loss of utility to the consumer.
#### § 359.803 Competition.

Any furlough for more than 30 calendar days, or for more than 22 workdays if the furlough does not cover consecutive calendar days, shall be made under competitive procedures established by the agency. The procedures shall be made known to the SES members in the agency.

[48 FR 11925, Mar. 2, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 6389, Feb. 2, 1995]
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: Project No.: 0172.08.005.607 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 2011 Prelim Cat Rev 

### CBI?

Yes

No TELEPHONE CALL RECORD Incoming Outgoing Date: 08/01/11 Time: 3:06 am

pm

Company Name: ISG Sparrows, Inc. ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Russ Becker (public contact) Contact Phone Number: (410)388-6622

General Subject: 2009 DMR Chlorine Discharges



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On August 1, 2011 at 3:06pm I called Russ Becker and le ft a message explaining that I would like to confirm the facility’s 2009 DMR Ch lorine Discharges.

On August1, 2011 at 3:21pm Mr. Becker returned my ca ll. He explained that the facility has a chlorination system in their treatment process an d then also has a dechlorination process. Their NPDES permit limit for total residual chlorine for outfall 001 is 0.2 mg/L and they samp le once a day, at least 5 days per 7 day week. Every month they then report their daily maximum. All 2009 disc harges are below this permit limit. The flow is very large because this outfall is from a once through non- contact cooling system (loop) for power generation for their onsite power plant. The wastewater is chlorinated and then dechlorina ted and the samples are taken at the discharge point. Outfall 001 is a service water intake. They have never had a permitting issue with chlorine; their measurements have always been below their NPDES permit limit. Mr. Becker also stated that this is a continuous process and they are discha rging chlorine constantly , although some months their tests read zero discharge. I thanked him for his time and told him I’d call back with any further questions.
### §60g–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 60g–2 was editorially reclassified as section 5322 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 60g–2, based on House Resolution No. 416, Eighty-ninth Congress, June 16, 1965, as enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 89–545, §103, Aug. 27, 1966, 80 Stat. 369, which related to employment of student congressional interns by Members of the House of Representatives and the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, was repealed by section 2 of House Resolution No. 420, Ninety-third Congress, Sept. 18, 1973, as enacted into permanent law by Pub. L. 93–245, ch. VI, §600, Jan. 3, 1974, 87 Stat. 1079, which provided that: "H. Res. 416, Eighty-ninth Congress, adopted June 16, 1965, and enacted as permanent law by section 103 of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1967 (80 Stat. 369; Public Law 89–545; 2 U.S.C. 60g–2), shall not be effective in the Ninety-third Congress on and after the effective date specified in section 3 of this resolution; and, effective on the date of enactment of the provisions of this resolution as permanent law, such H. Res. 416, Eighty-ninth Congress, is repealed."
472 P.2d 382

#### Rosendo T. SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF VALENCIA, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 9077.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

June 24, 1970.

Ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 403, 81 N.M. 644, 471 P.2d 678, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
EPA ICR No. 1246.12; OMB Control No. 2070-0072

ATTACHMENT D

Hourly Labor Costs Used in Estimating Respondent Burden Costs
Worker Category Raw Hourly 

Wage Rate a

Loaded Hourly 

Wage Rate b

Construction sector worker $21.61

c

$33.28

Construction supervisor $30.07d$46.31

Clerical worker $16.13e$24.84

Brake and clutch repair mechanic $18.78f$28.92

Brake and clutch repair supervisor $30.07g$46.31

Industrial hygienist $38.35

h

$59.06

Source:

a) BLS, 2013, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2012 National Occupational Employment Statistics data.

March 23, 2013. Occupations are the same as those used in the previous ICR. The employment categories used 

are from the Standard Occupational Classification system (SOC).

b) EPA calculated the loaded hourly wage rate by inflating the raw hourly wage rate by 54 percent to account for 

benefits and overhead (EPA, 1992). This is the same percentage estimate for benefits and overhead as used in 

prior ICR supporting statements.

c) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Construction and Extraction Occupations (Major Group)” category, SOC 

47-0000, in BLS, 2013. 

d) This is the mean hourly wage for the “First-Line Supervisors/Managers of Construction Trades and Extraction 

Workers” category, SOC 49-1011, in BLS, 2013. 

e) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Secretaries, Except Legal, Medical and Executive” category, SOC 43-

6014, in BLS, 2013. 

f) This is the mean hourly wage for the “Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics” category, SOC 49-

3023, in BLS, 2013.

g) This is the mean hourly wage for the “First-Line Supervisors/Managers of Mechanics, Installers, and 

Repairers” category, SOC 49-1011, in BLS, 2013. 

h) Because there is no industrial hygienist category in BLS, 2013, the mean hourly wage for the “Health and 

Safety Engineers, Except Mining Safety Engineers and Inspectors” category SOC17-2111, in BLS, 2013 was 

used. This category was used based on the similarity of duties as described in the data. 
References for Attachment D

BLS 2013, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2012 National Occupational Employment and 

Wage data March 29, 2013. Accessed May 14 2013. Available at 

http://www.bls.gov/oes/

EPA, 1992, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. Office of Policy, Planning and 

Evaluation. Instructions for Preparing Information Collection Requests (ICRs). June 1.
§ 317.306 Conversion of employees under time limited appointments. ( a ) *Coverage.* This section covers employees serving under: ( 1 ) A limited executive assignment under subpart E of part 305 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations; or
( 2 ) A similar type of time limited appointment in an excepted service position.
( b ) *Senior Executive Service appointment.* An employee covered by this section shall be subject to one of the following actions. ( 1 ) If the position in which the employee is serving under a limited executive assignment or similar type of time limited appointment will terminate within three years from the date of the proposed conversion action, the agency may convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service limited term appointment.
( 2 ) If the position in which the employee is serving under a limited executive assignment or similar type of time limited appointment will not terminate within three years from the date of the proposed conversion action, the agency may convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service noncareer appointment and assign the employee to a “general” position.
( 3 ) If the employee under a limited executive assignment has reinstatement eligibility to a position in the competitive service, or, as determined by the Office of Personnel Management, had substantial career-oriented service under a career-type appointment as defined in § 317.304(a)(2), and if immediately prior to the limited executive assignment and without a break in service the employee served under a career appointment or career-type appointment in a position now being designated a Senior Executive Service position then the employee may request conversion to a career appointment. Such request must be made on or before the end of the notice period. ( i ) If the employee requests conversion to career, the agency will convert the employee to a Senior Executive Service career appointment. The employee may be assigned to a “general” or a “career reserved” position. The name of the individual and basis for approving the request must be published in the Federal Register.
( ii ) If the employee does not request conversion to career, the agency will convert the employee as provided for in paragraphs (b) (1) and (2) of this section.
( 4 ) In lieu of action under paragraph (b) (1), (2), or (3) of this section, the agency may separate the employee from the civil service.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132663 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132663 COA: 273204 Branch CC: 03-087899-FH DOUGLAS HARR Y GOODGER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 9, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk