alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 2, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24435]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[CC Docket No. 97-90; CCB/CPD File No. 97-12; DA 04-2055]

Requests of US West Communications, Inc. for Interconnection Cost 
Adjustment Mechanisms; Petition for Declaratory Ruling and Contingent 
Petition for Preemption

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; termination of proceeding.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is a notification of final termination of the 
Requests of US West Communications, Inc. (US West) for Interconnection 
Cost Adjustment Mechanisms (ICAM); Petition for Declaratory Ruling and 
Contingent Petition for Preemption. US West (now Qwest) never pursued 
recovery of interconnection costs through ICAM surcharges, and the 
petition was dismissed without prejudice unless any interested party 
provided notice that a genuine dispute remained to be resolved. No such 
notices were received, and parties are notified that this proceeding 
has been terminated.

DATES: This proceeding has been terminated as of September 29, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Saulnier, Wireline Competition 
Bureau, Pricing Policy Division, (202) 418-1530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Public Notice in CC 
Docket No. 97-90, CCB/CPD File No. 97-12, released October 20, 2004. 
The complete text of the Public Notice is available for public 
inspection Monday through Thursday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday 
from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. in the Commission's Consumer and Governmental 
Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, Room CY-A257, 445 Twelfth 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text is available also 
on the Commission' Internet site at http://www.fcc.gov. On July 9, 
2004, the Wireline Competition Bureau's Pricing Policy Division issued 
an order stating the US West's Petition for Declaratory Ruling and 
Contingent Petition for Preemption would be dismissed without prejudice 
effective 30 days after publication of the order in the Federal 
Register, unless the Bureau received notice from any interested party 
that there was still a genuine dispute that remained to be resolved. A 
summary of the order was published in the Federal Register on August 
30, 2004. See 69 FR 52904, August 30, 2004. The Bureau received no 
notices within 30 days of that date. Therefore, the proceeding was 
terminated as of September 29, 2004.

Federal Communications Commission.
Jeffrey J. Carlisle,
Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-24435 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
#### § 2635.301 Overview.

This subpart contains standards that prohibit an employee from giving or contributing to a gift to an official superior, and official superiors are prohibited from knowingly accepting such a gift. Employees also are prohibited from soliciting a contribution from another employee for a gift to an official superior. In addition, employees are prohibited from accepting a gift from an employee who receives less pay. The prohibitions in this subpart apply unless the item is excluded from the definition of a *gift* (see § 2635.303(a)) or falls within one of the exceptions set forth in this subpart. Gifts from outside sources are subject to the limitations set forth in subpart B of this part.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
March 31, 2004, of Synagro Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Paul
Withrow, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company and that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                                 /s/ J. Paul Withrow
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 J. Paul Withrow
                                                 October 20, 2004
### §864. Combustible materials and rock dusting

#### (a) Accumulations; maintenance

Coal dust, including float coal dust deposited on rock-dusted surfaces, loose coal, and other combustible materials, shall be cleaned up and not be permitted to accumulate in active workings, or on electric equipment therein.

#### (b) Abatement of hazards in active working areas

Where underground mining operations in active workings create or raise excessive amounts of dust, water or water with a wetting agent added to it, or other no less effective methods approved by the Secretary or his authorized representative, shall be used to abate such dust. In working places, particularly in distances less than forty feet from the face, water, with or without a wetting agent, or other no less effective methods approved by the Secretary or his authorized representative, shall be applied to coal dust on the ribs, roof, and floor to reduce dispersibility and to minimize the explosion hazard.

#### (c) Rock dusting of all areas of underground mines; exceptions

All underground areas of a coal mine, except those areas in which the dust is too wet or too high in incombustible content to propagate an explosion, shall be rock dusted to within forty feet of all working faces, unless such areas are inaccessible or unsafe to enter or unless the Secretary or his authorized representative permits an exception upon his finding that such exception will not pose a hazard to the miners. All crosscuts that are less than forty feet from a working face shall also be rock dusted.

#### (d) Distribution of rock dust; places, quantities

Where rock dust is required to be applied, it shall be distributed upon the top, floor, and sides of all underground areas of a coal mine and maintained in such quantities that the incombustible content of the combined coal dust, rock dust, and other dust shall be not less than 65 per centum, but the incombustible content in the return aircourses shall be no less than 80 per centum. Where methane is present in any ventilating current, the per centum of incombustible content of such combined dusts shall be increased 1.0 and 0.4 per centum for each 0.1 per centum of methane where 65 and 80 per centum, respectively, of incombustibles are required.

#### (e) Limitation of applicability

Subsections (b) through (d) of this section shall not apply to underground anthracite mines.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title III, §304, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 774.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section operative 90 days after Dec. 30, 1969, except to the extent an earlier date is specifically provided for in Pub. L. 91–173, see section 509 of Pub. L. 91–173, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.
#### § 2411.12 Effect of failure to meet time limits.

Failure by the Solicitor or the IG either to deny or grant any request under this part within the time limits prescribed by the FOIA, as amended and these regulations shall be deemed to be an exhaustion of the administrative remedies available to the person making this request.

[88 FR 67061, Sept. 29, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-25-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1998
<CASH>                                             547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,612
<PP&E>                                          40,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,904
<BONDS>                                         75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,877
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,021)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §1372. Labor standards

The Administrator shall take such action as may be necessary to insure that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors on treatment works for which grants are made under this chapter shall be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing for the same type of work on similar construction in the immediate locality, as determined by the Secretary of Labor, in accordance with sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40. The Secretary of Labor shall have, with respect to the labor standards specified in this subsection,1 the authority and functions set forth in Reorganization Plan Numbered 14 of 1950 (15 F.R. 3176) and section 3145 of title 40.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title V, §513, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 894.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Reorganization Plan Numbered 14 of 1950, referred to in text, is Reorg. Plan No. 14 of 1950, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3176, 64 Stat. 1267, which is set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

In text, "sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40" substituted for "the Act of March 3, 1931, as amended, known as the Davis-Bacon Act (46 Stat. 1494; 40 U.S.C., sec. 276a through 276a–5)" and "section 3145 of title 40" substituted for "section 2 of the Act of June 13, 1934, as amended (48 Stat. 948; 40 U.S.C. 276c)" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Applicability of Labor Standards to Construction of Treatment Works

Pub. L. 112–74, div. E, title II, Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1020, provided in part that: "For fiscal year 2012 and each fiscal year thereafter, the requirements of section 513 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1372) shall apply to the construction of treatment works carried out in whole or in part with assistance made available by a State water pollution control revolving fund as authorized by title VI of that Act (33 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.), or with assistance made available under section 205(m) of that Act (33 U.S.C. 1285(m)), or both."

1 So in original. Probably should be "section,".
### SUBCHAPTER II—GRANTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TREATMENT WORKS
### §3047. Retired rank and pay held pursuant to other laws unaffected

Nothing in this subchapter shall prevent an officer from being placed on the retired list with the highest rank and with the highest retired pay to which the officer is entitled under any other provision of law.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §247, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 853q of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.
<PAGE>

                              UNITED RENTALS, INC.

    THOSE CORPORATIONS WHICH ARE INDENTED REPRESENT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE
CORPORATION UNDER WHICH THEY ARE INDENTED.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     State of
                        Name of Subsidiary                         Incorporation
                        ------------------                         -------------
<S>                                                                <C>
United Rentals Trust I............................................ Delaware
United Rentals (North America), Inc............................... Delaware
  Advance Barricades and Signing, Inc............................. Florida
  Coast Line Marking, Inc......................................... Florida
  Flasher Co. of Kansas, Inc...................................... Kansas
  Flasher Company of Oklahoma, Inc................................ Oklahoma
  Jadco Signing, Inc.............................................. Florida
  Lectric Lights Company.......................................... Texas
  Liddell Bros., Inc.............................................. Massachusetts
  Liddell Management Co., Inc..................................... Massachusetts
  Precision Pavement Marking, Inc................................. Minnesota
  State Barricading, Inc.......................................... Ohio
  State Sign, Inc................................................. Ohio
  Traffic Safety Services, Inc.................................... North Dakota
  Two Way Traffic, Inc............................................ Pennsylvania
  United Rentals Gulf, Inc........................................ Delaware
    United Equipment Rentals Gulf, L.P............................ Texas
  United Rentals Northwest, Inc................................... Oregon
    Provisto, S. de R.L. de C.V................................... Mexico
    U.S. Rentals, S. de R.L. de C.V............................... Mexico
  United Rentals Southeast, Inc................................... Delaware
    United Rentals Southeast, L.P................................. Georgia
  United Rentals of Canada, Inc................................... Ontario
  Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc................................. Minnesota
  Warning Safety Lights, Inc...................................... Florida
  Warning Safety Lights of Georgia, Inc........................... Florida
  WLI Industries, Inc............................................. Illinois
    Warning Lites of Indiana, Inc................................. Indiana
    Warning Lites of Iowa, Inc.................................... Iowa
    Safe-T-Flare Services, Inc.................................... Missouri
  Work Zone Safety, Inc........................................... Colorado
  Woudenberg Enterprises, Inc..................................... Arizona
  Wynne Systems, Inc.............................................. California
</TABLE>
§ 12.33 Importation of tea; entry; examination for customs purposes. ( a ) The importation of any merchandise as tea which is inferior in purity, quality, and fitness for consumption to the standards prescribed by the Act of March 2, 1897, as amended (21 U.S.C. 41 through 50), is prohibited. Customs officers and employees shall perform all duties required of them by the said act and regulations.
( b ) The importation of tea is subject also to the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the regulations thereunder. See §§ 12.1 to 12.5.
( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) The port director may order such an examination of packages containing tea as will satisfy him that no dutiable goods are packed therein. For this purpose the customary designation shall be made of packages for examination in public stores.
( e ) If the invoice has not been received, the importer may use an additional copy of the chop list and release permit required by the regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services as a pro forma invoice, marking “Pro forma invoice” across the face thereof.
[28 FR 14710, Dec. 31, 1963, as amended by T.D. 78-99, 43 FR 13060, Mar. 29, 1978; T.D. 82-145, 47 FR 35477, Aug. 16, 1982; T.D. 84-213, 49 FR 41167, Oct. 19, 1984; T.D. 89-1, 53 FR 51253, Dec. 21, 1988; T.D. 97-82, 62 FR 51770, Oct. 3, 1997]
#### LIEN, Respondent, v. THOMSON, Appellant.

(181 N. W. 916.)

(File No. 4785.

Opinion filed March 21, 1921.)

Appeal, Error — Brief, Failure to State Material Evidence, Abbreiviated, Unspecifying- Brief, Assignments, Non-Reference of to-Brief — Non-Consideration of Appeal.

- Adhere appellant’s brief does not purport to contain a statement of all material evidence received on trial, Supreme Court-is without power to consider or pass upon sufficiency of evidence to support verdict or judgment; and, appellant’s, brief' containing less than a dozen printed lines, and without allusion to or discussion of any assignment of error except that relating to insufficiency of evidence, the assignments themselves con*41taining no reference to page of brief at which record of alleged error is .printed, judgment below is affirmed.

'Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall 'County. Hon. Raymond L. Diudman, Acting Judge.

Action by Martin Rien, against A. W. Thomson.' From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

C. *R. Jorgenson,*for Appellant.

*Hozvard Babcock,*for Respondent.

SMITH, J.

Defendant appeals, fromi a judgment and an order overruling his mbtion for a new- trial and assigns as- error: First insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment; second, errors in rulings admitting and rejecting evidence.

It does not appear fromi appellant’s 'brief that it contains “a statement of all the material evidence received upon the trial.” This court, therefore, is without power to consider or pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict or judgment. McWaid v. Darnell, 41 S. D. 69, 168 N. W. 759. The argument in appellant’s brief contains less than a dozen printed lines and contains no allusion to, or discussion of, any assignments of error except that relating to insufficiency of the evidence. Assignments not discussed are deemed abandoned. State v. Gray, 27 S. D. 461, 131 N. W. 800; Bridenbaugh v. McElrath, 35 S. D. 307, 152 N. W. 113; Egan v. Dotson, 36 S. D. 549, 155 N. W. 783, Ann. Cas. 1917A, 296. Appellant’s assignments contain no reference whatever to the page of the brief at which the record of the alleged error is printed, and, in fact, the evidence printed in the brief is wholly narrative in form and does- not purport to-set out in connection with the evidence, the questions, answers, or rulings, -which are made the subject-matter of the assignments of error. For the reasons stated in McWaid v. Darnell, supra, the questions sought to be raised by assignments as to error in-rulings on evidence cannot be considered.

No error appearing from the record as it comes before us. the order and judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.
#### § 2635.803 Prior approval for outside employment and activities.

When required by agency supplemental regulation, employees must obtain prior approval before engaging in outside employment or activities. When it is determined to be necessary or desirable for the purpose of administering its ethics program, an agency may, by supplemental regulation, require employees or any category of employees to obtain prior approval before engaging in specific types of outside activities, including outside employment. Whether or not prior approval is required by agency supplemental regulations, employees have a continuing responsibility to ensure that their outside activities do not conflict with their official duties.
§ 210.61 Discovery and compulsory process. The presiding administrative law judge shall set all discovery deadlines. The administrative law judge's authority to compel discovery includes discovery relating to the following issues: ( a ) Any matter relevant to the motion for temporary relief and the responses thereto, including the issues of bonding by the complainant; and
( b ) The issues the Commission considers pursuant to sections 337 (e)(1), (f)(1), and (j)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930, viz., ( 1 ) The appropriate form of relief (notwithstanding the form requested in the motion for temporary relief),
( 2 ) Whether the public interest precludes that form of relief, and
( 3 ) The amount of the bond to be posted by the respondents to secure importations or sales of the subject imported merchandise while the temporary relief order is in effect. The administrative law judge may, but is not required to, make findings on the issues specified in sections 337 (e)(1), (f)(1), or (j)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Evidence and information obtained through discovery on those issues will be used by the parties and considered by the Commission in the context of the parties' written submissions on remedy, the public interest, and bonding by respondents, which are filed with the Commission pursuant to § 210.67(b).
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65371-65372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

[[Page 65372]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: December 20, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
December 14, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 80 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2019-50, CP2019-54.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-27497 Filed 12-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P