alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1531. Transfers of functions and activities

(a) The balance of an appropriation available and necessary to finance or discharge a function or activity transferred or assigned under law within an executive agency or from one executive agency to another may be transferred to and used—

(1) by the organizational unit or agency to which the function or activity was transferred or assigned; and

(2) for a purpose for which the appropriation was originally available.

(b) The head of the executive agency determines the amount that, with the approval of the President, is necessary to be transferred when the transfer or assignment of the function or activity is within the agency. The President determines the amount necessary to be transferred when the transfer or assignment of the function or activity is from one executive agency to another.

(c) A balance transferred under this section is—

(1) credited to an applicable existing or new appropriation account;

(2) merged with the amount in an account to which the balance is credited; and

(3) with the amount with which the balance is merged, accounted for as one amount.

(d) New appropriation accounts may be established to carry out subsection (c)(1) of this section.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 932.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1531(a), (b) | 31:581c(a)(1st sentence), (b)(1st sentence). | Sept. 12, 1950, ch. 946, §202, 64 Stat. 838. |
| 1531(c), (d) | 31:581c(a)(last sentence), (b)(last sentence). | |

In subsections (a) and (b), the defined term "executive agency" in section 102 of the revised title is substituted for "department or establishment" for consistency and clarity.

In subsection (a), the words "organizational unit or agency" are substituted for "agency", and the word "appropriation" is substituted for "said funds", for consistency and clarity.

Subsection (d) is substituted for "which are hereby authorized to be established" because of the restatement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Prohibition on Transfer of Funds to Other Departments and Agencies

Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title XVI, §1604, Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1598, provided that funds available for military functions of Department of Defense could not be made available to any other department or agency of Federal Government pursuant to a provision of law enacted after Nov. 29, 1989, unless, not less than 30 days before such funds were made available to such other department or agency, Secretary of Defense submitted to congressional defense committees a report describing effect on military preparedness of making such funds available to such department or agency, prior to repeal and restatement in section 2215 of Title 10, Armed Forces, by Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XI, §1106(a)(1), (b), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1750.
§ 2426.11 Requesting; granting; criteria. ( a ) An agency shall accord consultation rights on Government-wide rules or regulations to a labor organization that: ( 1 ) Requests consultation rights on Government-wide rules or regulations from an agency; and
( 2 ) Holds exclusive recognition for 3,500 or more employees.
( b ) An agency shall not grant consultation rights on Government-wide rules or regulations to any labor organization that does not meet the criteria prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section.
### §719. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(7), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165

Section, R.S. §4679, provided that no additional salary should be allowed to any civil, military, or naval officer on account of his being employed on the Light-House Board, or being in any manner attached to the light-house service.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 10/31/2011 10:09 AM 

Subject: FW: Materials for APPA's meeting Nov 3, 2011 & EGU MACT 

Hi all, 

Attached are materials we received from APPA on the Mercury MACT rule. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

 

From: Pugh, Theresa [mailto:TPugh@publicpower.org] 

Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 6:03 PM 

To: Mancini, Dominic J. 

Cc: Echols, Mabel E.; Nipper, Joe 

Subject: Materials for APPA's meeting Nov 3, 2011 & EGU MACT 

 

Good afternoon. We just wanted to make certain that you have our 

materials on the timing issues and suggested solution(s) for the EGU 

MACT. 

 

The first attachment is the complete APPA set of comments (with 

attachments) and the second is the excerpt that specifically addresses 

timing concerns. 

 

Mercury MACT Comments - American Public Power Association - FINAL - 8.2.11.pdf 

EGU MACT Comment Excerpt.docx
### §822. Representation of Secretary in civil litigation by Solicitor of Labor

Except as provided in section 518(a) of title 28, relating to litigation before the Supreme Court, the Solicitor of Labor may appear for and represent the Secretary in any civil litigation brought under this chapter but all such litigation shall be subject to the direction and control of the Attorney General.

(Pub. L. 91–173, title I, §112, as added Pub. L. 95–164, title II, §201, Nov. 9, 1977, 91 Stat. 1313.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–173, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 742, known as the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 801 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 816(f) of this title prior to the amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 95–164.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days after Nov. 9, 1977, see section 307 of Pub. L. 95–164, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 801 of this title.
§ 1201.130 Rights; answer to complaint. ( a ) *Rights.* ( 1 ) A person on whose behalf the Special Counsel brings a corrective action has a right to request intervention in the proceeding in accordance with the regulations in § 1201.34 of this part. The Clerk of the Board shall notify each such person of this right.
( 2 ) When the Special Counsel files a complaint seeking corrective action, the judge to whom the complaint is assigned shall provide an opportunity for oral or written comments by the Special Counsel, the agency involved, and the Office of Personnel Management. 5 U.S.C. 1214(b)(3)(A).
( 3 ) The judge to whom the complaint is assigned shall provide a person alleged to have been the subject of any prohibited personnel practice alleged in the complaint the opportunity to make written comments, regardless of whether that person has requested and been granted intervenor status. 5 U.S.C. 1214(b)(3)(B).
( b ) *Filing and default.* An agency named as respondent in a Special Counsel corrective action complaint may file an answer with the judge to whom the complaint is assigned within 35 days of the date of service of the complaint. If the agency fails to answer, the failure may constitute waiver of the right to contest the allegations in the complaint. Unanswered allegations may be considered admitted and may form the basis of the judge's decision.
( c ) *Content.* An answer must contain a specific denial, admission, or explanation of each fact alleged in the complaint. If the respondent agency has no knowledge of a fact, it must say so. The respondent may include statements of fact and appropriate documentation to support each denial or defense. Allegations that are unanswered or admitted in the answer may be considered true.
### §763a–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(14), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165

Section, act June 6, 1940, ch. 257, §7, 54 Stat. 247, related to application of former sections 763 and 763a–1 of this title to persons of the Coast Guard.
§ 1655.13 Loan approval and issuance. ( a ) When the completed loan agreement is signed electronically or returned by the participant to the TSP record keeper, together with any documentation required to be submitted, the loan will be initially approved or denied by the TSP record keeper based upon the requirements of this part, including the following conditions: ( 1 ) The participant has signed the promise to repay the loan, has agreed to repay the loan through payroll deductions, and has certified that the information given is true and complete to the best of the participant's knowledge;
( 2 ) Processing of the loan would not be prohibited by § 1655.19 relating to court orders;
( 3 ) The spouse of a FERS or uniformed services participant has consented to the loan or, if the spouse's whereabouts are unknown or exceptional circumstances make it inappropriate to secure the spouse's consent, an exception to the spousal requirement described in § 1655.18 has been granted;
( 4 ) The spouse of a CSRS participant has been given notice or, if the spouse's whereabouts are unknown, an exception to the spousal requirement described in § 1655.18 has been granted;
( 5 ) When a paper agreement is required, the completed loan agreement, including all required supporting documentation, was received by the TSP record keeper before the expiration date specified on the loan agreement; and
( 6 ) The participant has met any other conditions that the Executive Director may require.
( b ) If approved, the loan will be issued unless: ( 1 ) The participant's employing agency has reported the participant's separation from Government service;
( 2 ) The TSP record keeper receives written notice that the participant has died;
( 3 ) The participant's account balance on the loan issue date does not contain sufficient employee contributions and associated earnings to make a loan of at least $1,000;
( 4 ) A hold on the account is processed before the loan is disbursed; or
( c ) If the loan is otherwise acceptable but the amount available to borrow is less than the requested amount (but is at least $1,000), the loan will be issued in the maximum amount available at the time of the disbursement. In such a case, the periodic payment amount will remain the same and the loan term may be shortened.
( d ) The loan issue date is considered to be the date the loan was made.
( e ) If a loan disbursement is returned as undeliverable, the TSP record keeper will attempt to locate the participant. If the participant does not respond within 90 days, the TSP record keeper will repay the loan with the returned loan proceeds.
[68 FR 35515, June 13, 2003, as amended at 87 FR 31693, May 24, 2022]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-039 September 26, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC PROPOSES $19,200 FINE AGAINST A SOUTH BEND, IND., HOSPITAL

FOR UNINTENDED RADIATION DOSES TO FIVE PATIENTS 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has proposed a $19,200 fine against St. Joseph

Regional Medical Center in South Bend, Ind., for unintended radiation doses to several patients

undergoing radiation therapy last year.

The patients received the radiation exposures to their legs during treatment for cervical cancer.

The unintended exposures occurred when a small sealed capsule containing a radiation source shifted

during treatment, resulting in the unintended radiation doses to the skin of each patient’s leg. The

capsule with a radiation source shifted because it was not the appropriate size for the treatment device.

The radiation doses resulted in injury to a small area of three patients’ skin requiring followup

treatment. Radiation doses received by two other patients did not cause visible injuries and did not

require special treatment. 

The NRC conducted two special inspections that reviewed the causes and the circumstances

around these incidents and the hospital’s response. The NRC also retained an independent medical

consultant to evaluate the radiation doses to the patients. 

NRC inspectors identified violations of NRC requirements that included the unintended

radiation doses; failure to develop proper procedures and to train hospital staff in the procedures and

requirements; failure to report the unintended radiation doses promptly after discovery; and failure to

ensure that radiation safety activities were performed in accordance with procedures and regulatory

requirements. 

“The NRC’s regulations are designed to protect public health and safety. We expect our license

holders to adhere to these regulations to avoid situations such as this one,” said James Caldwell, NRC

Regional Administrator. 

The hospital implemented immediate and extensive improvements to address the causes of the

treatment problem and to enhance their radiation therapy program.

“The unintended radiation doses to the five patients occurred under very specific circumstances

that have since been corrected,” said Caldwell. “Our inspectors have reviewed the hospital’s enhanced

radiation therapy program and found it to be in compliance with NRC requirements,” he added. 
The hospital has until Oct. 24 to either pay the fine or to protest it. If the fine is protested and

subsequently imposed by the NRC staff, the hospital may request a hearing.

The letter notifying St. Joseph Regional Medical Center of the proposed fine has been posted to

the NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/enforcement/current.html#materials .

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-019 February 2, 2005

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC CONFERENCE ON LICENSING PROCESS

FOR STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Spent Fuel Project Office will hold a public conference

Feb. 8 at the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md., to discuss the licensing process for spent fuel

storage facilities and the packaging and transportation of radioactive material.

The conference will be held from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in the Auditorium of Two White Flint

North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. The conference is open to the public and there is no

registration fee. However, those wishing to attend are urged to register in advance and to arrive early to

facilitate processing through security.

“This conference is part of the NRC’s efforts to inform and learn from our stakeholders and the

public in order to continue improving our licensing and certification programs,” said E. William Brach,

director of the Spent Fuel Project Office.

Conference sessions will cover NRC regulations in 10 CFR Part 71, on packaging and

transportation of radioactive material, and Part 72, licensing requirements for independent spent fuel

storage facilities (ISFSIs). Topics include lessons learned from previous licensing reviews, the “rules of

engagement” for review of transportation and storage applications, and ways to improve the licensing

process in the future.

Persons wishing to register for the conference may do so on the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/conference-symposia/sfpo/ . Additional information about the

conference is available at that Web address.

###
### §1909. MARPOL Protocol; proposed amendments

#### (a) Acceptance of certain amendments by the President

A proposed amendment to the MARPOL Protocol received by the United States from the Secretary-General of the International Maritime Organization pursuant to Article VI of the MARPOL Protocol, may be accepted on behalf of the United States by the President following the advice and consent of the Senate, except as provided for in subsection (b) of this section.

#### (b) Action on certain amendments by the Secretary of State

A proposed amendment to Annex I, II, V, or VI to the Convention, appendices to those Annexes, or Protocol I of the Convention received by the United States from the Secretary-General of the International Maritime Organization pursuant to Article VI of the MARPOL Protocol, may be the subject of appropriate action on behalf of the United States by the Secretary of State following consultation with the Secretary, or the Administrator as provided for in this chapter, who shall inform the Secretary of State as to what action he considers appropriate at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the period specified in Article VI of the MARPOL Protocol during which objection may be made to any amendment received.

#### (c) Declaration of nonacceptance by the Secretary of State

Following consultation with the Secretary, the Secretary of State may make a declaration that the United States does not accept an amendment proposed pursuant to Article VI of the MARPOL Protocol.

(Pub. L. 96–478, §10, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2302; Pub. L. 100–220, title II, §2106, Dec. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 1463; Pub. L. 110–280, §9, July 21, 2008, 122 Stat. 2615.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–280 substituted "Annex I, II, V, or VI" for "Annex I, II, or V" and inserted "or the Administrator as provided for in this chapter," after "Secretary,".

1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–220, §2106(1), substituted "International Maritime Organization" for "Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–220, §2106(2), substituted "Annex I, II, or V to the Convention, appendices to those Annexes, or Protocol I of the Convention" for "Annex I or II, appendices to the Annexes, or Protocol I of the MARPOL Protocol," and "International Maritime Organization" for "Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–220 effective Dec. 31, 1988, the date on which Annex V to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, entered into force for the United States, see section 2002(a) of Pub. L. 100–220, set out as a note under section 1901 of this title.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents SECY-06-0101 - Emergency Preparedness For Daycare Facilities Within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Update on Staff Actions and Request for Commission Approval for Related Staff Actions Accession Number: ML060760586 Date Released: Friday, May 19, 2006 Package Contents The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools. ML060760541 - SECY-06-0101 - Emergency Preparedness for Daycare Facilities Within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Update on Staff Actions and Request for Commission Approval for Related Staff Actions (6 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML060760629 - SECY-06-0101 Encl 1 -  Minutes of NRC Staff Meeting with the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and Summary of Follow-Up Activities (7 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML060760644 - SECY-06-0101Encl2 - NRC Staff Response to Petition Questions Regarding Daycare Preparedness in Pennsylvania and Recommendations for Improvement (14 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML060760650 - SECY-06-0101Encl3 - Proposed Amended Version of the Petition in the Federal Register on December 19, 2005 (25 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML060760655 - SECY-06-0101Encl4- Proposed Amended Version of the Petition Denial Published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2005 (Redline, Strike-in Version (28 page(s), 12/13/2005)
            ML060760661 - SECY-06-0101Encl5 - Basis For The Revised Petition Denial Language Related to State and Local Government Delegation of Emergency Planning Responsiblities (5 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML060760663 - SECY-06-0101Encl6 - Divider page (Part 1) (1 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML060460273 - PA Day Care Day Care Facilities Emergency Plan Guide. (53 page(s), 8/31/2003)
            ML060930234 - SECY-06-0101Encl7 - Proposed Letter to Petitioners (3 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML061240167 - SECY-06-0101Encl8 - divider page (Part 1) (1 page(s), 5/4/2006)
            ML061240468 - SECY-06-0101 - Enc. 8 -- DHS/FEMA Response to Daycare Commission Paper (2 page(s), 4/12/2006)


Privacy Policy Site Disclaimer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlame radiation and liner heat transfer in a tubular-can combustorHeat transfer within a combuster were examined. Total and spectral flame radiation in a tubular can combustor at a series of parametric operating conditions was measured. Radiation measurements were taken for a range of inlet air pressures from 0.34 to 2.0 MPa, inlet air temperatures from 533 to 700 K, with two different fuels, Jet-A and ERBS. Measurements of liner temperatures combined with the parametric radiation results allowed a calculation of the combustor liner heat loads. Flame emissivity was determined from the spectral measurements.Document ID19840005120Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsClaus, R. W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Neely, G. M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Humenik, F. M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1983Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:83538E-1909NASA-TM-83538Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace Sci. MeetingLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 9, 1984End Date: January 12, 1984Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number84N13188Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-42Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840005120.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §405. Establishment and modification of harbor lines on Potomac and Anacostia Rivers

The provisions of section 404 of this title are made applicable to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, and after July 25, 1912, harbor lines in the District of Columbia, or elsewhere on said rivers, shall be established or modified as therein provided.

(July 25, 1912, ch. 253, §1, 37 Stat. 206.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from part of section 1 of act July 25, 1912, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1912".