alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-066 May 15, 2006

NRC TO HOLD PUBLIC MEETING ON EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FOR 

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ON MAY 19th IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold a follow-up public meeting May 19th, in

Rockville, Md., to discuss enhancements to the agency’s emergency preparedness guidance and

regulations for nuclear power plants in a post-9/11 threat environment. The May meeting builds on a

two-day meeting held on August 31st and September 1, 2005, during which senior management from

the Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response participated in roundtable discussions with local,

state and tribal representatives, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), advocacy groups and

nuclear industry staff. 

In an attempt to further understand the perspective of the non-governmental organizations, the

May meeting will seek additional comments on how the NRC can both enhance emergency

preparedness and ensure openness in the regulatory process.

Among the topics to be covered are security-based emergency action levels, security-based

drills and exercises, offsite protective actions and alternate ways to alert the public. 

The meeting will take place on Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. It will be held at the

Ramada Inn-Rockville at 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Md. A meeting notice and complete agenda

is available on the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm .

For additional information on the meeting, contact Lisa Gibney at 301-415-8376 or send an e-mail to

lag1@nrc.gov .

###
### §236a. Lands in naval petroleum reserves and naval oil-shale reserves; effect of other laws

Nothing in sections 185, 221,1 223, 223a,1 and 226 of this title and this section shall be construed as affecting any lands within the borders of the naval petroleum reserves and naval oil-shale reserves or agreements concerning operations thereunder or in relation to the same, but the Secretary of the Navy is hereby authorized, with the consent of the President, to enter into agreements such as those provided for under sections 184 and 226 of this title, which agreement shall not, unless expressed therein, operate to extend the terms of any lease affected thereby.

(Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 599, §3, 49 Stat. 679.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 221 of this title, referred to in text, was omitted from the Code.

Section 223a of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by act Aug. 8, 1946, ch. 916, §14, 60 Stat. 958.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 2100.10 Conditions of disclosure and accounting of certain disclosures. No record containing personally identifiable information within an AFRH system of records shall be disclosed by any means to any person or agency outside the AFRH, except by written request or prior written consent of the individual subject of the record, or as provided for in the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, unless when such disclosure is: ( a ) To those officers and employees of the agency which maintains the record and who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties;
( b ) Required under 5 U.S.C. 552;
( c ) For a routine use of the record compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;
( d ) To the Bureau of the Census for purposes of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to 13 U.S.C.;
( e ) To a recipient who has provided the AFRH with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred in a form that is not individually identifiable;
( f ) To the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the U.S. Government or for evaluation by the Archivist of the United States, or his/her designee, to determine whether the record has such value;
( g ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity if the activity is authorized by law, and if the head of the agency or instrumentality, has made a written request to the agency which maintains the record specifying the particular portion desired and the law enforcement activity for which the record is sought;
( h ) To a person pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual if upon such disclosure notification is transmitted to the last known address of such individual;
( i ) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;
( j ) To the Comptroller General, or any authorized representatives, in the course of the performance of the duties of the General Accounting Office;
( k ) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction; or
( l ) To a consumer reporting agency in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711(f).
§ 162.77 Prepenalty notice for violations of section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. ( a ) *When required.* If the Fines, Penalties, and Forfeitures Officer has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of section 592, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1592), has occurred, and determines that further proceedings are warranted, he shall issue to the person concerned a notice of his intent to issue a claim for a monetary penalty. The prepenalty notice shall be issued whether or not a seizure has been made.
( b ) *Contents* — ( 1 ) *Facts of violation.* The prepenalty notice shall: ( i ) Describe the merchandise,
( ii ) Set forth the details of the entry or introduction, the attempted entry or introduction, or the aiding or abetting of the entry, introduction, or attempt,
( iii ) Specify all laws and regulations allegedly violated,
( iv ) Disclose all material facts which establish the alleged violation,
( v ) State whether the alleged violation occured as the result of fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, and
( vi ) State the estimated loss of duties, if any, and, taking into account all circumstances, the amount of the proposed monetary penalty.
( 2 ) *Right to make presentations.* The prepenalty notice also shall inform the person of his right to make an oral and a written presentation within 30 days of the mailing of the notice (or such shorter period as may be prescribed under § 162.78) as to why a claim for a monetary penalty should not be issued or, if issued, why it should be in a lesser amount than proposed.
( c ) *Exceptions.* A prepenalty notice shall not be issued if: ( 1 ) The claim is for $1,000 or less, or
( 2 ) The violation occurred with respect to a noncommercial importation.
[T.D. 79-160, 44 FR 31958, June 4, 1979, as amended by T.D. 99-27, 64 FR 13676, Mar. 22, 1999]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 208 (Thursday, October 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62917-62918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24187]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction 
with each Board meeting was published in the Federal Register (Volume 
69, Number 194, Page 60196) on October 7, 2004. No requests were 
received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the 
record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing in conjunction with OPIC's 
November 10, 2004 Board of Directors meeting scheduled for 2 p.m. on 
November 4, 2004 has been cancelled.

CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Information on the hearing cancellation may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 
218-0136, or via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a494e455d446a455a4349044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e083848f978ea08f908983ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 62918]]


    Dated: October 26, 2004.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-24187 Filed 10-26-04; 10:55 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Carroll,

Dec., 1898.

#### *Perkins v.*Quint. Hobson (Perkins, *Plff. in Int.) v.*Same.

Jurisdiction of claims against an insolvent debtor, acquired by the probate court upon institution of insolvency proceedings, is not affected by a subsequent assignment to a non-resident; and a discharge of the debtor applies to all claims of which the court had jurisdiction at the time such proceedings were begun.

Assumpsit, in the first action upon a promissory note, payable to Quint and by him indorsed to Hobson, and in the second action for items of account originally due to Hobson. Pacts found by the court.

Quint filed a petition as an insolvent debtor in March, 1895, and Hobson had due notice of the proceedings. October 17 *429or 18, Hobson for a valuable consideration assigned and delivered tbe note and account to Perkins, who had no knowledge of the insolvency proceedings.' October 32, Quint filed a composition agreement and entitled himself to a discharge, which was granted November 15. Hobson and Quint reside in this state, and Perkins in the state of Maine.

*Josiah H. Hobbs,*for the plaintiff.

*Worcester, Gafney Snow,*for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

When the insolvency proceedings were instituted and Hobson was notified thereof, the probate court acquired jurisdiction of his claims against the defendant. Jurisdiction that has once attached is not defeated by subsequent events. *Clarke*v. *Mathewson,*12 Pet. 164, 171; *Tapley*v. *Martin,*116 Mass. 275.

The discharge applied to all claims of which the court had jurisdiction, and the actions cannot be maintained.

*Judgments for the defendant.*

Blodgett, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred.
3rd Amend / Kelly A. Gray



 Exhibit 10.48 
  
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this “Third Amendment”), dated January 9, 2003 and effective as of November 3, 2002 (the
“Effective Date”), is entered into by and between St. John Knits, Inc., a California corporation (“Company”), and Kelly A. Gray, an individual (“Executive”), and amends terms of that certain Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 14, 1998, as amended, between the Company and Executive (the “1998 Agreement”). In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows (all
capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the 1998 Agreement). 
  
 1. Section I.1 of
the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to delete the words “President” and replace it with “Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President and Creative Director”; provided, however, that elimination of the titles Co-President and/or
Creative Director shall not be deemed a material change in Executive’s title under Section IV.1(b)(ii). 
  
 2.
Section II.1 of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to reflect an increase in the Base Salary from $650,000 to $750,000, as of the Effective Date. 
  
 3. Section IV.1(b)(ii) of the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  
          “(ii) a substantial alteration in the nature, status or prestige of Executive’s responsibilities or a change in Executive’s title or
reporting level from that set forth in this Agreement; provided, however, that after at Change in Control (as defined hereinafter), a change in Executive’s title or reporting level shall not be deemed Good Reason so long as Executive maintains
substantially the same duties as Executive had prior to the Change in Control;” 
  
 4. Section IV.1(b)(vi) of
the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety. 
  
 5. Section IV.5(e) of the 1998 Agreement shall be amended to
delete the language “or 4.1(b)(vi)” and to change the reference to “1,300,000” to “1,500,000”. 
  
 6. Section IV.5(f) of the 1998 Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety. 
  
 7. Section V.1 shall
be amended to replace the notice information for David Krinsky, Esq. with the following: 
  
     “Mr. Jim Kelley 
     Vestar Capital Partners 
     1225 17th Street, Suite 1660 
     Denver, Colorado 80202” 
  

8. All other provisions contained in Article V of the 1998 Agreement are 







  
 incorporated into this Third Amendment by this reference. 
  
 9. All other terms and conditions of the 1998 Agreement, as amended, shall remain the same. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  
  
 
	 “Company”
  
 St. John Knits,
Inc.,
 a California corporation
 
	 
	 By:
 	 	 /s/    Roger Rupper        
 

	  	 	 Roger Ruppert
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 

 
  
 
	 “Executive”
 
	 
	 /s/    Kelly A.
Gray        
 

	 Kelly A. Gray
 

 
  
 Approved as to Content: 
  
 
	 
	 /s/    Jim Kelley        
 

	 Jim Kelley
 Chairman of the Board
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mary B. Knoblauch, Appellant, v. Warden of the Jail of the Fourth District Magistrates’ Court, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §567a. Flood and pollution control compacts between certain States

The consent of the Congress of the United States is given to the States of Maine, New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Tennessee, and Ohio, or any two or more of them, to negotiate and enter into agreements or compacts for conserving and regulating the flow, lessening flood damage, removing sources of pollution of the waters thereof, or making other public improvements on any rivers or streams whose drainage basins lie within any two or more of the said States.

No such compact or agreement shall be binding or obligatory upon any State a party thereto unless and until it has been approved by the legislatures of each of the States whose assent is contemplated by the terms of the compact or agreement and by the Congress.

(June 8, 1936, ch. 542, §§1, 2, 49 Stat. 1490.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Approval of Compact by Congress

Act July 11, 1940, ch. 581, 54 Stat. 752, provided in part that: "The consent and approval of Congress is hereby given to an interstate compact relating to the control and reduction of the pollution of the streams of the Ohio River drainage basin negotiated and entered into or to be entered into under authority of Public Resolution Numbered 104, Seventy-fourth Congress, approved June 8, 1936, [this section] and now ratified by the States of New York, Illinois, Kentucky, and Indiana, and by the State of Ohio (whose ratification is to go into effect at the time at which the States of New York, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia enter into said compact as parties and signatory States), also by the State of West Virginia (whose ratification is to go into effect at the time at which the States of New York, Ohio, Virginia, and Pennsylvania enter into said compact as parties and signatory States) * * *."

"Sec. 2. Without further submission of said compact, the consent of Congress is hereby given to the State of Virginia or any other State with waters in the Ohio River drainage basin, entering into said compact as a signatory State and party in addition to the States therein named or any of them.

"Sec. 3. The commissioners to represent the United States, as provided in article IV of said compact, shall be appointed by the President.

"Sec. 4. Nothing contained in this Act or in the compact herein approved shall be construed as impairing or affecting the sovereignty of the United States or any of its rights or jurisdiction in and over the area or waters which are the subject of such compact.

"Sec. 5. The right to alter, amend, or repeal the provisions of section 1 is hereby expressly reserved."
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark M. Wellesley-Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/  Mark M. Wellesly-Wood
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Mark M. Wellesley-Wood
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            December 31, 2002
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 11
 
              ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         UNAUDITED
                                  ------------------------
                                    PRO FORMA YEAR ENDED              ACTUAL YEAR ENDED
                                  ------------------------  -------------------------------------
                                   DECEMBER     DECEMBER     DECEMBER     DECEMBER     DECEMBER
(In thousands, except per share       31,          31,          31,          31,          31,
amounts)                             1998         1997         1998         1997         1996
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
 
<S>                               <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
 
Average number of common shares
 outstanding for basic and
 diluted computation (see
 Note)..........................      19,646       19,616       18,594        8,230        8,228
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Net income (loss) earnings......   $ (10,676)   $  (5,577)   $ (11,279)   $  (3,200)   $    (659)
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Basic earnings per share........   $    (.54)   $    (.28)   $    (.61)   $    (.39)   $    (.08)
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Diluted earnings per share......   $    (.54)   $    (.28)   $    (.61)   $    (.39)   $    (.08)
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
                                  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
</TABLE>
 
Note: The effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and the assumed
conversion of the note payable and preferred stock have not been included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the period after issuance because
to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
 
                                       48
### §1165a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section transferred to section 1293a of this title.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Dan W. Matthias, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/  DAN W. MATTHIAS**  |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Dan W. Matthias           |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| February 17, 2004    |

 

----
exv10w55



 








RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CERTIFICATE



June 12, 2003



Exhibit 10.55




Byron Marchant

One BET Plaza

Washington, DC 20018-1211 USA


Dear Byron:



Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
Amended & Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have been
granted a Restricted Stock Award (the “Award”) for the number of shares (each
an “Award Share”, and collectively, the “Award Shares”) of the Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) of TeleCommunication
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as outlined below. This Certificate constitutes
part of and is subject to the terms and provisions of the attached Restricted
Stock Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) which is incorporated herein by
reference.




Granted To: Byron Marchant
     
(the “Employee”)

Grant Date: June 12, 2003

Award Shares Granted: 10,000

Vesting Schedule: 100% after 1 Year


10,000 on 06/12/2004



By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Award granted on
the Grant Date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and the Plan. I understand that I will forfeit all
unvested Award Shares at the close of business on my last day of employment at
TCS. I further acknowledge receipt of the Plan Prospectus and the latest annual
report or other SEC filing, and agree to be bound by all of the terms and
conditions of the Award, as evidenced in the Agreement, and the Plan.




	 	 	 
	Signature: /s/ Byron Marchant

	 	Date: ________________
	                     Byron Marchant
	 	 






Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above, please
make the appropriate corrections on this form.
**Exhibit 31.4****CERTIFICATION**I, Benjamin L. Palleiko, in my capacity as principal financial officer of Penwest PharmaceuticalsCo., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (“this report”) of PenwestPharmaceuticals Co.; and2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.        Date: April 10, 2008 /s/ Benjamin L. Palleiko   Benjamin L. Palleiko   Senior Vice President, Corporate Development andChief Financial Officer