alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3904. Expedited review of certain appeals

(a) In General.—An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States from any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order of a court upon the constitutionality of any provision of chapter 5 of title 3.

(b) Jurisdiction.—The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over the appeal referred to in subsection (a), advance the appeal on the docket, and expedite the appeal to the greatest extent possible.

(Added Pub. L. 104–331, §3(c), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4070.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, see section 3(d) of Pub. L. 104–331, set out as a note under section 1296 of this title.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-06-052 September 12, 2006

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC PROPOSES $3,250 CIVIL PENALTY FOR WEST VIRGINIA FIRM

OVER TEMPORARY LOSS OF NUCLEAR GAUGE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is proposing a $3,250 fine for a firm based in

Morgantown, W.Va., for two violations of agency regulations involving maintaining proper control of

a nuclear gauge. The gauge in question belongs to Triad Engineering, Inc. It contains small amounts

of NRC-licensed radioactive material and is used for such industrial purposes as measuring the density

of soil at construction sites.

NRC inspectors identified the violations during a special inspection on May 8 and June 14 at

Triad Engineering’s offices in Winchester and Purcellville, Va. The inspection was performed in

response to an event on March 14. On that day, a Triad Engineering employee was transporting a

portable nuclear density gauge in an open-bed pickup truck from the company’s Purcellville office to a

temporary job site. The gauge was stored in a locked transport container. The container had not been

secured to the truck and the vehicle’s tailgate was not closed.

As the truck turned onto a public roadway from the facility’s driveway, the container fell off the

vehicle onto the roadway. The Triad employee did not realize this had occurred until two members of

the public working nearby alerted him. The citizens also notified local police, who in turn contacted

the local fire marshal. After recovering the nuclear gauge and returning it to the field office, company

personnel performed checks and determined that the container and the gauge were not damaged. The

event did not result in radioactive exposures to any members of the public.

Triad Engineering discussed the violations with NRC staff during a predecisional enforcement

conference on Aug. 9.

Based on information gathered during the inspection and provided by the company during the

Aug. 9th meeting, the NRC has identified two violations of agency requirements. They are: A failure by

the authorized gauge user to properly secure the gauge to the bed of the truck and close the tailgate; and

a failure to control and maintain constant surveillance of a gauge containing NRC-licensed radioactive

material that was in an unrestricted area and not in storage.
“Although the (radioactive) source in this case remained in the shielded position at all times,

these violations could have caused unnecessary radiation exposure to members of the public,” NRC

Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins wrote in a letter to the company explaining the enforcement

action.

The company is required to provide the NRC with a written reply within 30 days.

###
### §68–7. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 68–7 was editorially reclassified as section 6574 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mothers Work, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Edward M. Krell, Chief Operating Officer & Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/ EDWARD M. KRELL**                                      | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Edward M. Krell                                              |
| *Chief Operating Officer & Chief Financial Officer* |
| May 8, 2008                                             |

 

----
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES



------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Name                                              Jurisdiction of Organization
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Tag-It Pacific Limited........................... Hong Kong
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Talon International, Inc......................... Delaware
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Tag-It, Inc...................................... California
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Tag-It Pacific (HK) Ltd.......................... British Virgin Islands
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Tagit de Mexico, S.A. de C.V..................... Mexico
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

A.G.S. Stationary, Inc........................... California
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Pacific Trim & Belt, Inc. ....................... California
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Talon Zipper (Shenzhen) Company Ltd. ............ China
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

Talon International Pvt. Ltd. ................... India
------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

No. III-03-002 January 7, 2003

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC OVERSIGHT PANEL TO HOLD TWO MEETINGS ON DAVIS-BESSE REACTOR

VESSEL HEAD DAMAGE IN PORT CLINTON, OH

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will hold two meetings on Tuesday, January 14, to

review the status and adequacy of recent activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station as a result

of the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head. The plant, which has been shut down since

February 16, is operated by FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company.

Both meetings will be at the Camp Perry Clubhouse, 1000 Lawrence Road, Bldg. 600, in Port

Clinton. A picture identification is required to enter Camp Perry; the guards will provide visitors with

directions to the meeting site.

The first meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EST), when the NRC oversight panel, set up to

coordinate the agency’s activities associated with the corrosion damage to the reactor vessel head, will

meet with utility officials. The meeting will focus on the status of repairs at the plant, results of recent

NRC inspections and upcoming activities. The public is invited to observe the business portion of the

meeting and will have an opportunity to make comments and ask questions of the NRC staff before the

meeting is adjourned.

The second meeting will begin at 7 p.m. (EST) to update the public on NRC’s activities related

to the reactor vessel head degradation and will provide a summary of the earlier meeting. The public

will be invited to ask questions and make comments. 

Transcripts of both meetings will be posted on the NRC’s web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/vessel-head-degradation.html.

The NRC oversight panel, created on April 29, includes NRC management and staff from its

Region III office in Lisle, Illinois; the NRC Headquarters office in Rockville, Maryland; and the NRC

Resident Inspector Office at the Davis-Besse site.

Documents on the Davis-Besse corrosion issue, including further details on NRC's oversight

panel activities, are posted on the NRC's web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/opsexperience/vessel-head-degradation.html.

###
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Paul B. Bowman, Chief
Financial Officer of Cymer, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Registrant), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 5th day of November, 2009.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ PAUL B.
BOWMAN     
|Paul B. Bowman,        
|Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cymer, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which it relates), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-011 March 31, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SENDS AUGMENTED INSPECTION TEAM TO REVIEW 

EQUIPMENT DAMAGE AT FLORIDA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is sending an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT) to

review equipment damage at Unit 3 of the Turkey Point nuclear power plant. The damage was

reported by Florida Power & Light Company, which operates the plant near Florida City, about 30

miles southeast of Miami. The AIT inspection will include an evaluation of the cause of the equipment

damage, including the possibility that it was damaged intentionally. 

An AIT is formed to review the circumstances surrounding more significant issues at 

NRC-licensed facilities. The NRC inspection team includes specialists from the agency’s Region II

office in Atlanta. The team is expected to spend about one week at the site before returning to the

regional office where the information they have gathered will be analyzed and evaluated.

“Our inspection team will review the company’s own investigation as well as independently

assess the extent of the equipment issues and the company’s response,” said NRC Region II

Administrator William Travers. 

Travers said that because Unit 3 was shut down and the plant’s procedures led to the discovery

of the damage early in the process of starting up, the actual safety significance was low. 

###
§ 295.205 Processing demands or requests. ( a ) After service of a demand or request to testify, the General Counsel will review the demand or request and, in accordance with the provisions of this subpart, determine whether, or under what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to official information and/or produce official records and information.
( b ) OPM will process requests in the order in which they are received. Absent exigent or unusual circumstances, OPM will respond within 45 days from the date that we receive it. The time for response will depend upon the scope of the request.
( c ) The General Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure described by this subpart where a waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of OPM or the United States or for other good cause.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-021 May 5, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Co. on Thursday, May 11, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance for last year at the

Clinton Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Clinton, Ill.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the Vespasian

Warner Public Library, 310 N. Quincy St., in Clinton. The NRC will respond to questions or

comments from the public before the close of the meeting.

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Clinton plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting’s discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/clin_2005q4.pdf .

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Clinton plant operated safely during the period. The

NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Clinton during 2005 were

determined to be “green.” As a result of this performance, the NRC will conduct the normal, baseline

level of inspections during the upcoming year.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill. Among the areas of plant operations

to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are access control to radiologically significant areas,

radioactive material processing and transportation, radiological instrumentation, and maintenance

effectiveness.
Current performance information for Clinton is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/CLIN/clin_chart.html .

###
### §189. Rules and regulations; boundary lines; State rights unaffected; taxation

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to prescribe necessary and proper rules and regulations and to do any and all things necessary to carry out and accomplish the purposes of this chapter, also to fix and determine the boundary lines of any structure, or oil or gas field, for the purposes of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed or held to affect the rights of the States or other local authority to exercise any rights which they may have, including the right to levy and collect taxes upon improvements, output of mines, or other rights, property, or assets of any lessee of the United States.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §32, 41 Stat. 450.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of the Interior to promulgate regulations under this chapter relating to fostering of competition for Federal leases, implementation of alternative bidding systems authorized for award of Federal leases, establishment of diligence requirements for operations conducted on Federal leases, setting of rates for production of Federal leases, and specifying of procedures, terms, and conditions for acquisition and disposition of Federal royalty interests taken in kind, transferred to Secretary of Energy by section 7152(b) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. Section 7152(b) of Title 42 was repealed by Pub. L. 97–100, title II, §201, Dec. 23, 1981, 95 Stat. 1407, and functions of Secretary of Energy returned to Secretary of the Interior. See House Report No. 97–315, pp. 25, 26, Nov. 5, 1981.

#### Outer Continental Shelf; Rules and Regulations With Respect to Leases

Rules and regulations with respect to mineral leases on submerged lands of outer Continental Shelf to be prescribed by Secretary of the Interior, see section 1334 of Title 43, Public Lands.
Moffett B. Roller

mroller@rollerbauer.com Law Offices



## R OLLER 

## & B

AUER, PLLC Washington Dulles International Airport 45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200 Dulles, VA 20166 Phone: 202-331-3300 • Fax: 202-331-3322 Lee A. Bauer lbauer@rollerbauer.com January 9, 2013 Docket Management Facility U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140 Washington, DC 20590
Re: Supplement to Petition of Aerolineas Ejecutivas, S.A. de C.V. (Certificate No. ER2F804F) for an Exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 129.5(b) (requirement to conduct operations in accordance with the flight data recorder Standards of Annex 6 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation); Docket FAA-2012-1256

Dear Sir/Madam: Aerolineas Ejecutivas, S.A. de C.V. (ALE), hereby supplements its Petition for an Exemption from from 14 C.F.R. § 129.5(b) filed in the above docket on November 23,2012, with an English translation of the complete DGAC Policy Memorandum CP AV06/06 R1, dated December 20, 2006, entitled “Flight Data Recorder Specifications.” A Spanish copy of the Policy Memorandum, with an English translation of relevant excerpts, was attached to ALE’s initial Petition.
The complete English translation provides additional support for ALE’s Petition. The “Background” and “Description” sections on pages 2 and 3 and Section 2.8.1.3 on page 11 of the Memorandum state that the DGAC has modified its enforcement policy regarding flight data recorder (FDR) requirements for aircraft that weigh more than 5,700 kg (12,540 pounds) but have nine or fewer seats. The Memorandum explains that the DGAC is not enforcing the FDR requirement for such aircraft due to the fact that supplemental type certificates are generally not available for the installation of FDRs on such aircraft.
For these reasons and the reasons set forth in its initial Petition, ALE hereby respectfully requests an exemption from Part 129.5(b) to the extent Annex 6 to the International Civil Aviation Convention may require ALE to install flight data recorders in its aircraft configured for nine or fewer passenger seats. Respectfully submitted, Roller & Bauer, PLLC Attorneys for Aerolineas Ejecutivas, S.A. de C.V.

By: ____________________________

Moffett B. Roller
Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10QSB FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,122
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,934
<OTHER-SE>                                    (42,717)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,122
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,046
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 210.64 Interlocutory appeals.

There will be no interlocutory appeals to the Commission under § 210.24 on any matter connected with a motion for temporary relief that is decided by an administrative law judge prior to the issuance of the initial determination on the motion for temporary relief.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Union Bankshares, Ltd. (the
"Company" ) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
R. Harrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/S/CHARLES R. HARRISON
------------------------------------------
Charles R. Harrison
Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2002