alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-082 July 7, 2004

NRC NAMES PRE-LICENSE APPLICATION PRESIDING OFFICER

TO RESOLVE DISPUTES ON SUBMITTAL OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN DOCUMENTS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued an order designating G. Paul Bollwerk III,

chief of the agency’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, as Pre-License Application Presiding

Officer for Yucca Mountain. The Commission order expressly authorizes Judge Bollwerk to delegate

that authority.

The Pre-License Application Presiding Officer will be responsible for resolving any disputes

concerning certification of the electronic availability of documents for a future hearing on the

Department of Energy’s expected application for a license for a high-level radioactive waste repository

at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

“The Commission is interested in assuring the prompt availability of information, so we quickly

established the Pre-License Application Presiding Officer to address and resolve disputes,” said NRC

Chairman Nils J. Diaz.

NRC regulations require all potential participants in the license application hearing process to

make their documents available to other potential participants and the public in electronic form through

the Licensing Support Network website, http://www.lsnnet.gov . The documents that must be made

available on this network consist of the information that a party, potential party or interested

government participant intends to rely on in the licensing proceeding for a high-level waste repository,

and certain other relevant information.

Requiring participants to make pertinent documents available through the Licensing Support

Network for use by the other participants eliminates the need for the traditional means of document

discovery and will allow potential parties to use some part of the pre-application period to review

documents and prepare contentions for filing in petitions to intervene in the hearing.

 NRC regulations require the Department of Energy (DOE) to make its material available no

later than six months before submitting its license application to the NRC. On June 30, DOE certified

to the NRC the public availability of its documents.

###
### §59v. Middle River, Maryland

#### (a) Description

That portion of the waterway in which is located Dark Head Creek in the community of Middle River, Baltimore County, Maryland, lying northwest of a line extending south 68 degrees 37 minutes 56 seconds west from a point (227.50 feet from the northeast corner of the existing bulkhead and pier line) whose coordinates in the Maryland State Coordinate System are north 544967.24 and east 962701.05 (latitude north 39 degrees 19 minutes 42 seconds and longitude west 76 degrees 25 minutes 29.5 seconds) and thence south 44 degrees 48 minutes 20 seconds west, 350.12 feet to a point (at the southwest corner of the existing bulkhead and pier line) whose coordinates in the Maryland State Coordinate System are north 544635.94 and east 962242.46 (latitude north 39 degrees 19 minutes 39 seconds and longitude west 76 degrees 25 minutes 35.4 seconds), is declared to be a nonnavigable water of the United States for purposes of the navigation servitude.

#### (b) Pierhead and bulkhead line of Dark Head Creek

The line described in subsection (a) shall be established as a combined pierhead and bulkhead line of Dark Head Creek.

#### (c) Previously authorized projects

Any project heretofore authorized by any Act of Congress, insofar as such project is within the boundaries of Dark Head Creek as described in subsection (a), is not authorized after November 17, 1986.

#### (d) Reservation of rights

The right to alter, amend, or repeal this section is hereby expressly reserved.

(Pub. L. 99–662, title XI, §1160, Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4257.)
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-06-023 April 17, 2006

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE AT McGUIRE NUCLEAR PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Duke Energy Corporation

officials on Tuesday, April 25, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance last year at the

McGuire nuclear power plant, located north of Charlotte, N.C.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 2:00 p.m. in the McGuire

Office Complex at the plant site. The NRC staff will present the results of the assessment and be

available to respond to questions or comments from the public before the close of the meeting. 

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the McGuire plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This

meeting is a chance for us to discuss that safety performance with the company, with local officials and

with people living near the plant.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/mcg_2005q4.pdf .

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear

plant performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

depending on the safety significance of the issues involved. 

The NRC said the McGuire plant operated safely during 2005 with all inspection findings being

“green,” or very low safety significance, and all performance indicators also indicating performance at

levels requiring no additional NRC oversight. 

As a result, the NRC plans to conduct only routine baseline inspections at the plant for the rest

of 2006. The NRC staff will also conduct several non-routine inspections, including the independent

spent fuel storage facility, reactor vessel head and head penetrations, containment sump blockage and

initial reactor operator licensing exams. 

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. 
Current information for the McGuire plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG1/mcg1_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/MCG2/mcg2_chart.html .

###
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofMothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward M. Krell,Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| **/s/  EDWARD M. KRELL**                            | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Edward  M. Krell                                    |
| *Executive  Vice President-Chief Financial Officer* |
| February  9, 2006                                   |

 

----
§ 122.135 When airline has in-bond liquor storeroom. ( a ) *Restocking.* Liquor kits on board an aircraft landing at an airport where the airline involved has an authorized in-bond liquor storeroom may be removed and restocked in the storeroom.
( b ) *Inventory record.* Each authorized airline in-bond liquor storeroom shall keep an inventory record in a form that satisfies the port director. The inventory record shall account for the receipt and use of all aircraft liquor and tobacco stores on which duty and/or tax has not been paid.
( c ) *Airline employees.* Any airline which has an authorized in-bond liquor store room at an airport shall give the port director: ( 1 ) A list of names of all airline employees authorized to break Customs seals on liquor kits in the in-bond liquor storeroom; and
( 2 ) Signature samples of the authorized employees.
( d ) *Opening of aircraft liquor kits.* Aircraft liquor kits received in an authorized storeroom shall be opened only by authorized airline employees, or by Customs officers.
( e ) *Contents of liquor kits.* The employees who break the seals on aircraft liquor kits shall check the contents at once. The employees shall immediately report to the port director any: ( 1 ) Evidence of seal tampering;
( 2 ) Difference between the seal numbers on the liquor kits and those recorded on the stores list; and
( 3 ) Differences in quantity as shown on the stores list.
( f ) *Handling the liquor kits* — ( 1 ) *Partial bottles.* Partial bottles of liquor may be removed from incoming liquor kits and kept in the in-bond liquor storeroom to be destroyed or combined with other partial bottles. This may be done only under Customs supervision. The costs of Customs supervision shall be paid by the airline.
( 2 ) *Exportation.* The contents of incoming liquor kits may be commingled to restock outbound liquor kits. The commingling must take place in the airline in-bond liquor storeroom, using liquor bottles on which the seal has not been broken.
( 3 ) *Sealing.* All liquor kits shall be sealed as provided in § 122.132(a) before removal from the in-bond liquor storeroom. All seal numbers shall be listed on an outgoing stores list.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-44635, 333-47913, 333-61299, 333-64361, 333-65621 and 
333-67075) of our report dated February 20, 1998, with respect to the 
consolidated financial statements of IQ Software Corporation as of January 
31, 1998 and for each of the two years in the period then ended, included in 
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 1999.

                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 26, 1999
§ 1639.40 Applicability and scope. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart implement 31 U.S.C. 3720A which authorizes the Department of the Treasury to reduce a tax refund by the amount of a past-due legally enforceable debt owed to a Federal agency.
( b ) For purposes of this section, a past-due legally enforceable debt referable to the Department of the Treasury is a debt that is owed to the Board; and: ( 1 ) Is at least $25.00 dollars;
( 2 ) Except in the case of a judgment debt, has been delinquent for at least three months and will not have been delinquent more than 10 years at the time the offset is made;
( 3 ) Cannot be currently collected under the salary offset provisions of 5 U.S.C. 5514;
( 4 ) Is ineligible for administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) by reason of 31 U.S.C. 3716(c)(2) or cannot be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716(a) by the Board against amounts payable to the debtor by the Board;
( 5 ) With respect to which the Board has given the debtor at least 60 days to present evidence that all or part of the debt is not past due or legally enforceable, has considered evidence presented by the debtor, and has determined that an amount of the debt is past due and legally enforceable;
( 6 ) Which has been disclosed by the Board to a credit reporting agency as authorized by 31 U.S.C. 3711(e), unless the credit reporting agency would be prohibited from reporting information concerning the debt by reason of 15 U.S.C. 1681c;
( 7 ) With respect to which the Board has notified or has made a reasonable attempt to notify the debtor that: ( i ) The debt is past due, and
( ii ) Unless repaid within 60 days thereafter, the debt will be referred to the Department of the Treasury for offset against any overpayment of tax; and
( 8 ) All other requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720A and the Department of Treasury regulations relating to the eligibility of a debt for tax return offset have been satisfied.
§ 317.402 Career reserved positions. ( a ) The qualifications standard must be in writing and identify the breadth and depth of the professional/technical and executive/managerial knowledges, skills, and abilities, or other qualifications, required for successful performance in the position.
( b ) The standard must be specific enough to enable applicants to be rated and ranked according to their degree of qualifications when the position is being filled on a competitive basis.
( c ) Each qualifications criterion in the standard must be job related. The standard may not emphasize agency-related experience, however, to the extent that it precludes otherwise well-qualified candidates from outside the agency from appointment consideration.
( d ) The standard may not include— ( 1 ) A minimum length of experience requirement beyond that authorized for similar positions in the General Schedule;
( 2 ) A minimum education requirement beyond that authorized for similar positions in the General Schedule; or
( 3 ) Any criterion prohibited by law or regulation.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

h0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148466 & (47)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148466

COA: 309876

Kent CC: 11

- 009886

- FH

MARCUS DWANE MANNING, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 14, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to

remand is DENIED.
#### Solomon Stern v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

Motion granted and plaintiff stayed from proceeding with examination pending determination of appeal from order, with leave to plaintiff to move to vacate the stay if the appeal be not prosecuted with diligence. Order to be settled on notice. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 2634.606 Updated disclosure of advice-and-consent nominees. ( a ) *General rule.* Each individual described in § 2634.201(c) who is nominated by the President for appointment to a position that requires advice and consent of the Senate must submit a letter updating the information in the report previously filed under § 2634.201(c) through the period ending no more than five days prior to the commencement of the first hearing of a Senate Committee considering the nomination to all Senate Committees considering the nomination. The letter must update the information required with respect to receipt of: ( 1 ) Outside earned income; and
( 2 ) Honoraria, as defined in § 2634.105(i).
( b ) *Timing.* The nominee's letter must be submitted to the Senate committees considering the nomination by the agency at or before the commencement of the first committee hearing to consider the nomination. The agency must also transmit copies of the nominee's letter to the designated agency ethics official referred to in § 2634.605(c)(1) and to the Office of Government Ethics.
( c ) *Additional certification.* In each case to which this section applies, the Director of the Office of Government Ethics will, at the request of the committee considering the nomination, submit to the committee an opinion letter of the nature described in § 2634.605(c)(3) concerning the updated disclosure. If the committee requests such a letter, the expedited procedure provided by § 2634.605(c) will govern review of the updated disclosure, which will be deemed a report filed for purposes of that paragraph.
§ 316.703 Effect on tenure of position change of status quo employees. ( a ) A status quo employee who is promoted, demoted, or reassigned becomes: ( 1 ) An indefinite employee when the position change occurs while he is not serving overseas; or
( 2 ) An overseas limited employee when the position change occurs while he is serving overseas.
( b ) An employee referred to in paragraph (a) of this section who is changed back to his status quo position becomes a status quo employee.
### §103. Branches and organizations

The Army National Guard of each State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands includes such members of the staff corps corresponding to the staff corps of the Army as the Secretary of the Army may authorize.

(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 597; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XII, §1234(b)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2059; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, §1057(b)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3441.)

| Revised section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 103 | 32:9. | July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (proviso of 13th par. under "National Guard"), 40 Stat. 875. |

The word "members" is substituted for the words "officers and enlisted men". The word "Regular" is omitted, since the organization is now prescribed for the Army, and the Regular Army is only a personnel category.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–163 substituted "State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands" for "State and Territory, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia".

1988—Pub. L. 100–456 struck out "the Canal Zone," after "Puerto Rico,".
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 1, 2007 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ ANAND NALLATHAMBI  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          68,705
<SECURITIES>                                    29,351
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                       740
<INVENTORY>                                     56,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,080
<PP&E>                                          66,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,171
<BONDS>                                        172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,779
<SALES>                                         49,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,679
<CGS>                                           30,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,158
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,703
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
#### Emmitt JONES *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 03-491

147 S.W.3d 690

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered February 19, 2004

*William M. Howard, Jr.,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Emmitt Jones, by his attorney, William M. Howard, Jr., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Howard admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the *219motion. *See Terry v.*State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265*Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. *In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases,*265 Ark. 964.
#### Samuel Schwartz, Respondent, v. J. Willett Fox and Others, Appellants.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
§ 2472.9 Conduct of hearing and prehearing conference. ( a ) A designated representative of the Panel, when so appointed to conduct a hearing, shall have the authority on behalf of the Panel to: ( 1 ) Administer oaths, take the testimony or deposition of any person under oath, receive other evidence, and issue subpoenas;
( 2 ) Conduct the hearing in open or in closed session at the discretion of the designated representative for good cause shown;
( 3 ) Rule on motions and requests for appearance of witnesses and the production of records;
( 4 ) Designate the date on which posthearing briefs, if any, shall be submitted; and
( 5 ) Determine all procedural matters concerning the hearing, including the length of sessions, conduct of persons in attendance, recesses, continuances, and adjournments; and take any other action which, in the judgment of the designated representative, will promote the purpose and objectives of the hearing.
( b ) A prehearing conference may be conducted by the designated representative of the Panel to: ( 1 ) Inform the parties of the purpose of the hearing and the procedures under which it will take place;
( 2 ) Explore the possibilities of obtaining stipulations of fact;
( 3 ) Clarify the positions of the parties with respect to the issues to be heard; and
( 4 ) Discuss any other relevant matters which will assist the parties in the resolution of the dispute.
[48 FR 19695, May 2, 1983. Redesignated at 61 FR 41295, Aug. 8, 1996]