alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Declaration of Disaster #P065]

In accordance with notices received from the Department of Homeland Security—Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective October 13 and 22, 2004, the above numbered Public Assistance declaration is hereby amended to include Cattaraugus, Niagara, Orange, and Orleans Counties in the State of New York as a disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms and flooding occurring on August 29, 2004, and continuing through September 16, 2004.

                    All other information remains the same,                     *i.e.*, the deadline for filing applications for physical damage is November 30, 2004.                

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59008.)

Dated: October 26, 2004.

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-24370 Filed 11-1-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-KSB of the year ended December 31, 2004, we hereby
certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      1.    The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
            all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


OnScreen Technologies, Inc.


By: /s/                               March 31, 2005
  -------------------------------
  John "JT" Thatch, President/CEO

By: /s/                               March 31, 2005
  -------------------------------
  Mark R. Chandler, COO/CFO



                                       49
§ 2100.8 Review of request for amendment. ( a ) A written acknowledgement of the receipt of a request for amendment of a record will be provided to the requester within 10 working days, unless final action regarding approval or denial will constitute acknowledgment.
( b ) Where there is a determination to grant all or a portion of a request to amend a record, the record shall be promptly amended and the requesting individual notified. Individuals, agencies or components shown by disclosure accounting records to have received copies of the record, or to whom disclosure has been made, will be notified of the amendment by the system manager in which the file is located.
( c ) Where there is a determination to deny all or a portion of a request to amend a record, a designated official will promptly advise the requesting individual of the specifics of the refusal and the reasons; and inform the individual that he/she may request a review of the denial(s).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24692]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA has forwarded the new information collection request 
described in this notice to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
for review and comment. We published a Federal Register Notice on May 
3, 2004 (69 FR 24217) with a 60-day public comment period concerning 
this information collection. We are required to publish this notice in 
the Federal Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Please submit comments by December 6, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathleen Kendrick,202-366-2035, 
Office of Real Estate Services, Federal Highway Administration, 
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20590-0001. Office hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Uniform Act Focused Certification Program for Right-of-Way 
Professionals.
    Background: FHWA proposes to conduct research to examine and report 
on training and certification options for right-of-way and other real 
estate service providers. In addition, the FHWA proposes to assess the 
market need for the establishment of a new certification program.
    Respondents: 54 State or territory transportation agencies, 46 
selected cities, counties, and private sector respondents.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 110 hours.
    Frequency: One-time survey.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments to the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: DOT Desk Officer. You are asked 
to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including: (1) 
Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the FHWA's 
performance; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for the 
FHWA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected 
information; and (4) ways that the burden could be minimized, including 
the use of electronic technology, without reducing the quality of the 
collected information.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.

    Issued on: October 29, 2004.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis Division.
[FR Doc. 04-24692 Filed 11-4-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 141

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 141 appear by CBP Dec. No. 16-26, 81 FR 93019, Dec. 20, 2016.

#### § 141.14 Deceased or insolvent consignees and court-appointed administrators.

The executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased consignee, the receiver or other legal representative of an insolvent consignee, or the representative appointed in any action or proceeding at law to act for a consignee shall not be permitted to make entry unless he produces a duly endorsed bill of lading or air waybill, a carrier's certificate, or a duplicate bill of lading or air waybill, executed in accordance with subsections (h) or (i) of section 484, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1484), showing him to be the consignee for Customs purposes.

[T.D. 78-394, 43 FR 49787, Oct. 25, 1978]
**Exhibit 10.25**

 

**AMENDMENT 2002-1**

**TO THE**

**MOTHERSWORK, INC.**

**AMENDED ANDRESTATED STOCK OPTION PLAN**

 

The Board ofDirectors of Mothers Work, Inc. (the “Company”) has caused the Mothers Work,Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) to be amended asfollows, subject to the following condition, effective as of the 13th dayof  November, 2002:

 

1.             Amendment. Section 5 of thePlan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“Section5.  Stock Subject to the Plan.

 

Subject tothis Section 5 and to the provisions of Section 8 of the Plan, the maximumaggregate number of Shares which may be optioned and sold under the Plan is OneMillion Nine Hundred Seventy Five Thousand (1,975,000), which amount consistsof the 725,000 Shares available for grant under the Plan prior to its 1997amendment and restatement,   anadditional 500,000 Shares authorized for grant under the amended and restatedPlan effective December 9, 1997, an additional 250,000 Shares authorized forgrant under the amendment effective as of January 1, 2001, and an additional500,000 Shares authorized for grant under the amendment effective as ofNovember 13, 2002.  Options may beeither incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, as determined bythe Board.  If an Option expires orbecomes unexercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full, theShares subject to such Option shall, unless the Plan shall have beenterminated, return to the Plan and become available for future grant under thePlan.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, no individual shall receive, overthe term of the Plan, Options for more than an aggregate of  Six Hundred Thousand (600,000) Shares.”

 

2.             Condition.  The amendment to the Plan set forth inparagraph 1 above will only be effective upon the requisite approval of theCompany’s stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to beheld on February 7, 2003.

 

The Plan, asamended by the foregoing change in paragraph 1 above, and subject to thestockholder approval described in paragraph 2 above, is hereby ratified andconfirmed in all respects.

 

----
### §546. Investigation of stream flow and watersheds; surveys in connection with dams

The surveys of navigable streams shall include such stream-flow measurements and other investigations of the watersheds as may be necessary for preparation of plans of improvement and a proper consideration of all uses of the stream affecting navigation, and whenever necessary similar investigations may be made in connection with all navigable streams under improvement. Whenever permission for the construction of dams in navigable streams is granted, or is under consideration by Congress, such surveys and investigations of the sections of the streams affected may be made as are necessary to secure conformity with rational plans for the improvement of the streams for navigation.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 382, §3, 36 Stat. 669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from section 3 of act June 25, 1910, popularly known as the "Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1910". Other provisions of such section were omitted, as superseded by section 545 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

General provisions regulating the construction of dams were made by the Dam Act of June 21, 1906, ch. 3508, 34 Stat. 386, as amended by act June 23, 1910, ch. 360, 36 Stat. 593, apparently omitted from the Code as superseded.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

WASHINGTON, DC 20543-0001

April 1,2015

Clerk

Court ofCriminal Appeals ofTexas ftpf en P.O. Box 12308 C0^T0f^DIM Capitol Station ^'"AlARp^^ Austin, TX 78711 APR Qq ^fljc

RE: Charles R. Ray v. Texas -

TXCoCRA WE-49,997-05 ^COsHQ@rk

No: 14-9113

Dear Clerk:

The above-entitled petition for a writ of certiorari was originally postmarked

December 8,2014 and received again on March 31,2015. The papers are returned for

the following reason(s):

The petition is out-of-time. The date ofthe lower court judgment or order denying a

timely petition for rehearing was August 20, 2014. Therefore, the petition was due on or

before November 18, 2014. Rules 13.1, 29.2 and 30.1. When the time to file a petition

for a writ of certiorari in a civil case (habeas action included) has expired, the Court no

longer has the power to review the petition.

The order dated September 16, 2014 does not appear to be the denial of a timely filed

petition for reconsideration/rehearing.

The petition in case #14-9113 has been removed from the docket.

Enclosures

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

By:

Andrew Downs

(202) 479-3038
§ 1630.18 Penalties. ( a ) Title 18, U.S.C. 1001, Crimes and Criminal Procedures, makes it a criminal offense, subject to a maximum fine of $10,000 or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, to knowingly and willfully make or cause to be made any false or fraudulent statements or representation in any matter within the jurisdiction of any agency of the United States. Section (i)(3) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(i)(3), makes it a misdemeanor, subject to a maximum fine of $5,000 to knowingly and willfully request or obtain any record concerning an individual under false pretenses. Sections (i) (1) and (2) of 5 U.S.C. 552a provide penalties for violations by agency employees of the Privacy Act or regulations established thereunder.
( b ) [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Barbeques Galore Limited (the
Registrant) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sam Ruben Linz, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, do hereby
certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|               | 
|April 20, 2005 |  | /s/    SAM RUBEN
LINZ  
|               |  | Sam Ruben Linz         
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Barbeques Galore Limited and will be retained by Barbeques Galore Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff, upon request.
#### Farlou Realty Corporation et al., Respondents, *v.*Woodsam Associates, Inc., Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

Whether proof that the primary and principal purposes of the lease involved herein were those which plaintiff pleads in its complaint, and whether such purposes were frustrated by governmental orders enacted as war measures should await trial. Proof of circumstances showing such primary and principal purposes will be competent, unless such proof contradicts written provisions of the lease. The question as to whether the proof would violate the paroi evidence rule may best be determined upon the trial of the action. Treating the matter as one of pleading, the complaint on its face is sufficient, and the particular matters sought to be stricken out appear relevant and proper.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and -disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order, on payment of said costs.

Present—Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., taking no part.

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of order on payment of said costs. [180 Misc. 629.]
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-04-025 June 22, 2004

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC

TO DISCUSS DIABLO CANYON ISSUES

Officials of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will meet with officials from

Pacific Gas & Electric Co., on July 2 in Arlington, Texas, to discuss problem identification and

resolution and human performance issues at the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant. PG&E operates

the nuclear power plant, located in San Luis Obispo, California.

The meeting, which is open to public observation, will be held at 8 a.m. at the office of

NRC Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400. The public is invited to observe the meeting

and NRC staff will be available for comments and questions from the public before the meeting

adjourns.

During its most recent safety assessment of Diablo Canyon, NRC identified the need for

improvement in PG&E’s problem identification and resolution program and in human

performance issues. These issues were discussed during the June 10 public meeting in San Luis

Obispo.

###
§ 2412.12 Agency review of refusal to inform, to provide access to, or to amend or correct records. ( a ) If your request for information regarding whether a system of records contains information about you or an individual for whom you are a parent or guardian, or your request for access to, or amendment or correction of, records of the Authority, the General Counsel, the IG, or the Panel, or an accounting of disclosure from such records, has been denied in whole or in part by an initial decision, you may, within thirty (30) working days after your receipt of notice of the initial decision, appeal that decision by filing a written request by mail to the Chairman of the Authority at the Authority's offices in Washington, DC, or by email to *privacy@flra.gov*.
( b ) The appeal must describe: ( 1 ) The request you initially made for information regarding, access to, or the amendment or correction of, records;
( 2 ) The initial decision of the FLRA's Solicitor or IG on the request; and
( 3 ) The reasons why that initial decision should be modified by the Chairman of the Authority.
( c ) Not later than thirty (30) working days after receipt of a request for review (unless such period is extended by the Chairman of the Authority or the Chairman's designee for good cause shown), the Chairman of the Authority or the Chairman's designee will notify you of their decision on your request. If the Chairman of the Authority or the Chairman's designee upholds the initial decision not to inform the individual of whether requested records exist, or not to provide access to requested records or accountings, or not to amend or correct the records as requested, then the Chairman of the Authority or the Chairman's designee will notify you of your right: ( 1 ) To judicial review of the Chairman of the Authority or the Chairman's designee's decision pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1); and
( 2 ) To file with the FLRA's Solicitor or IG, as appropriate, a concise written statement of disagreement with the determination. That written statement of disagreement will be made a part of the record and will accompany that record in any use or disclosure of the record.
### §2326f. Maintenance dredging data

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall establish, maintain, and make publicly available a database on maintenance dredging carried out by the Secretary, which shall include information on maintenance dredging carried out by Federal and non-Federal vessels.

#### (b) Scope

The Secretary shall include in the database maintained under subsection (a), for each maintenance dredging project and contract, estimated and actual data on—

(1) the volume of dredged material removed;

(2) the initial cost estimate of the Corps of Engineers;

(3) the total cost, including a separate line item for all Federal costs associated with the disposal of dredged material;

(4) the party and vessel carrying out the work; and

(5) the number of private contractor bids received and the bid amounts, including bids that did not win the final contract award.

(Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1133, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1654; Pub. L. 117–263, div. H, title LXXXI, §8207, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3756.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016, and also as part of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, also known as the WIIN Act, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 117–263 inserted ", including a separate line item for all Federal costs associated with the disposal of dredged material" before semicolon at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 1002 of Pub. L. 114–322, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 29, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of Richman
American Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
      Corp., Manager of the RegistrantJuly
      29, 2010
# Appendix 6 Detailed Risk Modeling ResultsSource CategoryFacility NEI IDFacility NameAddressCity StateEpichlorohydrin ElastomersProductionNEI11153ZEON CHEMICALS L P 1301 WEST 7TH STREETHATTIESBURG MSTable 1 - Facility Identification Information1 of 1CancerMIRCancerIncidenceNoncancerMax HITargetOrganCancerMIRNoncancerMax HITargetOrganNEI111531.24E-051.01E-04 1.34E-01 Respiratory 1.24E-05 5.00E-01 Respiratory 100%1 BOLD indicates a cancer risk great than 1 in a million or a noncancer risk greater than 12 Facility cancer risk represent MIR at census block locations using Draft 2005 NATAFacility NEI IDSource Category Chronic Risk1Table 2 – Maximum Predicted HEM-3 Chronic RisksFacility-Wide Chronic Risk1, 2SC % ofFacility-wideCancer Risk1 of 1

# REL AEGL1 AEGL2 ERPG1 ERPG2

NEI11153 Epichlorohydrin 1.64E-01 9.67E-03 2.34E-03 9.67E-03 2.34E-03

NEI11153 Ethylene oxide 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.89E-03 0.00E+00 2.89E-03

NEI11153 Toluene 1.34E-01 6.61E-03 1.10E-03 6.61E-03 2.61E-03

Note: BOLD indicates acute risks greater than 1 Facility NEI ID Pollutant Table 3 – Maximum Predicted Acute Risks (HEM-AERMOD)

1 

# Some maximum acute impacts may be at onsite locations. Maximum Hazard Quotient 1



# 1 of 1
### SUBCHAPTER XXIX—GRANTS FOR FAMILY-BASED SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT