alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,010,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  509,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   264,000
<INVENTORY>                                    614,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,125,000
<PP&E>                                         983,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,167,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,402,000
<BONDS>                                      1,519,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,419,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,167,000
<SALES>                                      3,700,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,700,000
<CGS>                                        1,803,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,803,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             468,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,816,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,541,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                250,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,291,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 316.903 Qualifications.

Agencies must evaluate eligible post-secondary students using the government-wide OPM prescribed minimum qualification standard or an OPM-approved agency-specific qualification standard for the position being filled.
#### Charles S. Baylis, Respondent, *v.*John Prentice, Appellant.

(Argued October 3, 1878;

decided December 10, 1878.)

This was an action upon a lease to recover rent reserved. The defense was that the premises were surrendered before o the rent sued for accrued. The lease was for two years from April 1, 1875, contained a clause that the premises were not to be sub-let, unless to a satisfactory tenant, to be approved of by one of three persons named, one of whom was D. B. *605Baylis, plaintiff’s father, who also had authority to attend to repairs. Defendant, in December, 1875, called upon said D. B. Baylis and told him that he should not occupy the demised premises, and that he had an application to rent it, the name of the proposed sub-tenant was not stated. Baylis replied that plaintiff would be home in June, and that he (Baylis) wanted the house free. Defendant said he would pay the rent to January first. No steps were taken by defendant toward sub-letting. The action was to recover for rent accruing after that time. Baylis had no authority from plaintiff to make the statement. Held, tliat even if a surrender to D. B. Baylis had been proved it would not have availed defendant, as no authority to accept such surrender, or to release defendant was shown, and that a verdict was properly directed for plaintiff.

*Wm. P. Prentice*for appellant.

*Thomas S. Moore*for respondent.

Rapallo, J.,

reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent.

Judgment affirmed.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs Region IV 

 611 Ryan Plaza Drive - Suite 400

 Arlington, TX 76011-4005

No. IV-03-034 August 8, 2003

Contact: Victor Dricks E-Mail: opa4@nrc.gov

Phone: 817-860-8128

NRC ASSIGNS NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

TO SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials have assigned Jeffrey Cruz as the senior

resident inspector at the South Texas Project nuclear power plant, near Bay City, Texas. Cruz

joins resident inspector Gilbert Guerra at the site. 

Mr. Cruz joined the NRC in 1995 as a Radiation Specialist in the Region IV offices in

Arlington, Texas. He was promoted to Senior Health Physicist in 1999, also at Region IV. His

responsibilities included coordination of the inspection schedule and disposition of the inspection

for approximately 30 nuclear pharmacies. In July 2001, Mr. Cruz was assigned as the Resident

Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station in Kansas, where he served until July. 

Prior to joining the NRC, Mr. Cruz received a Master's degree in nuclear engineering

from the University of Missouri in 1994. While completing his graduate degree, he was

employed as a Senior Laboratory Technician at the Missouri University Research Reactor. He

earned a Bachelor's degree in general studies with emphasis in mathematics in 1991, also from

the University of Missouri.

 Mr. Cruz and his wife, Holly, have two children - a three-year-old girl, and a sevenmonth-old boy, and will reside in Lake Jackson, Texas. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors.

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections,

monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public. The NRC

resident inspectors at the South Texas Project site can be reached at (361) 972-8020.

###
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.714 Conversion based on service in a post-secondary student appointment under part 316, subpart I, of this chapter. ( a ) *Agency authority.* An agency may convert to a career or career-conditional appointment from a time-limited appointment pursuant to 5 CFR part 316, subpart I, without further competition.
( b ) *Eligibility.* To be eligible for conversion the post-secondary student must: ( 1 ) Have completed the course of study leading to the baccalaureate or graduate degree (or certificate as appropriate);
( 2 ) Have completed not less than 640 hours of current continuous employment in an appointment under § 316.902 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Meet the OPM qualification standards for the position to which the student will be converted; and
( 4 ) Meet the time-in-grade requirements in accordance with 5 CFR part 300, subpart F.
( c ) *Tenure on conversion.* An employee whose employment to career or career-conditional employment under this section becomes: ( 1 ) A career-conditional employee except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section; or
( 2 ) A career employee when he or she has completed the service requirement for career tenure or is excepted from it by § 315.201(c).
( d ) *Acquisition of competitive status.* A post-secondary student converted from time limited employment under this section acquires competitive status upon completion of probation.
[86 FR 46106, Aug. 18, 2021]
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-035 March 17, 2006

NRC COMPLETES MINNESOTA AGREEMENT 

TO REGULATE USE OF CERTAIN RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has completed an agreement with the state of Minnesota

to assume part of the agency’s regulatory authority over certain radioactive materials in the state.

Minnesota becomes the 34th state to sign such an agreement with the NRC. The agreement will become

effective March 31, 2006.

Under the agreement, the NRC will transfer to Minnesota the responsibility for licensing,

rulemaking, inspection and enforcement activities for: (1) radioactive materials produced as a result of

processes related to the production or utilization of special nuclear material (SNM); (2) uranium and

thorium source materials; and (3) SNM in quantities not sufficient to form a critical mass.

The NRC will transfer approximately 150 licenses, most for medical and industrial uses of

radioactive material, to Minnesota’s jurisdiction. The NRC will retain jurisdiction over a number of

activities identified in 10 CFR Part 150, including regulation of commercial nuclear power plants and

federal agencies using certain nuclear material in the state. In addition, NRC will retain authority for

the review, evaluation and approval of sealed sources and devices containing certain nuclear materials

manufactured in Minnesota and distributed throughout the country.

Before approving the agreement, NRC reviewed Minnesota’s radiation control program to

ensure it was adequate to protect public health and safety and was compatible with NRC’s program for

regulating the radioactive materials covered in the agreement. An announcement of the proposed

agreement was made in November, inviting comments from the public. No comments were received.

The agreement will be announced shortly in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreement, the

Governor of Minnesota’s request and supporting documents, as well as the NRC staff’s assessment

will be available through the NRC’s ADAMS online document library. Help in using ADAMS is

available by contacting the NRC Public Document Room staff at (301) 415-4737 or 1 (800) 397-4209,

or by e-mail at PDR@nrc.gov .

Thirty-three other states have previously signed such agreements with NRC. They are: 

Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky,

Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New
Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South

Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin. 

###
#### § 293.509 Use of existing Employee Medical Folders upon transfer or reemployment.

The requirements of § 293.306, regarding the use of existing OPFs, apply to the use of existing EMFs upon the employee's transfer to or reemployment in a new employing agency.
### §123. Persons locating lands subsequently withdrawn or classified; patents to

Any person who has, in good faith, located, selected, entered, or purchased, or any person who shall locate, select, enter, or purchase, after July 17, 1914, under the nonmineral land laws of the United States, any lands which are subsequently withdrawn, classified, or reported as being valuable for phosphate, nitrate, potash, oil, gas, or asphaltic minerals, may, upon application therefor, and making satisfactory proof of compliance with the laws under which such lands are claimed, receive a patent therefor, which patent shall contain a reservation to the United States of all deposits on account of which the lands were withdrawn, classified, or reported as being valuable, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the same.

(July 17, 1914, ch. 142, §3, 38 Stat. 510.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### North Platte Reclamation Project; Entry Prior to July 17, 1914; Mineral Rights

Patents for lands in North Platte Reclamation Project not to contain reservations of minerals in certain cases, see section 125 of this title.
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-011 March 23, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT NORTH ANNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Virginia Electric and Power

Company officials on March 29 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the

North Anna nuclear power plant, located near Mineral, Va. The period covered is the calendar year

2004.

The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. (EST) in the main auditorium of the North Anna Nuclear

Information Center, located at 1022 Haley Drive in Mineral. It is open to public observation. Before

the end of the meeting, the NRC staff will be available to answer questions from interested observers

related to the plant’s safety performance, as well as the NRC’s role in ensuring safe operation of the

facility.

Dr. William Travers, Administrator of the NRC’s Region II office in Atlanta, said “the NRC

staff rates the performance of each of the nation’s licensed, commercial nuclear power plants each

year.” He said the public meeting with the company “gives the NRC a chance to discuss the

assessment with company and local officials and interested residents living near the plant.” He said

NRC officials will answer any questions people may have related to the agency’s oversight of safety

and operations at North Anna.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office in Atlanta to plant officials addresses the plant’s

performance during 2004 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/na_2004q4.pdf .

The NRC uses color coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear

power plant performance. The colors start with “green” and increase to “white,” “yellow,” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

North Anna Units 1 and 2 operated safely during 2004, the NRC report said. The NRC report

said all inspection findings and performance indications for the plant in 2004 were classified as

“green” (of very low safety significance), and the agency will conduct only normal reactor oversight

safety inspections during the next evaluation period. 

Routine Inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

specialists from the Region II office in Atlanta and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. In

addition to baseline inspections in 2005, the NRC plans inspections of the plant’s pressurizer nozzles

and steam space pipe connections and of its Independent Spent Fuel (Dry Cask) Storage Installation.
 Current information for the North Anna plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/NA1/na1_chart.html

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/NA2/na2_chart.html

###
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 241 (Monday, December 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-51-2018]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 189--Kent/Ottawa/Muskegon Counties, 
Michigan; Authorization of Production Activity, Helix Steel (Twisted 
Steel Micro Rebar) Grand Rapids, Michigan

    On August 13, 2018, KOM Foreign Trade Zone Authority, grantee of 
FTZ 189, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to 
the FTZ Board on behalf of Helix Steel, within Site 11, in Grand 
Rapids, Michigan.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (83 FR 42109, August 20, 2018). On 
December 11, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.14.

    Dated: December 11, 2018.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-27246 Filed 12-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Charles Cranford, Appellant, Respondent, v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, Appellant.

Motion granted, without costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ.
#### § 302.105 Special agency plans.

An agency having a position subject to this part may establish a system which will result in granting to eligible persons the preference or priority consideration referred to in sections 1302(c) or 8151 of title 5, United States Code, but which does not conform to all the procedural requirements set forth in this part. The agency establishing such a system must ensure that all eligible applicants entitled to veteran preference or priority consideration receive at least as much advantage in referral as they would receive under the procedures set forth in this part.
§ 300.502 Coverage. ( a ) These regulations apply to the competitive service and to Schedules A and B in the excepted service.
( b ) Agencies may not use temporary help services for the Senior Executive Service or for the work of managerial or supervisory positions.
[61 FR 19510, May 2, 1996]
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-04-026 May 4, 2004

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC UPGRADES INSPECTION TEAM LOOKING INTO WORKER EXPOSURES AT

PUERTO RICO IRRADIATOR FACILITY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has upgraded a Special Inspection Team sent to

Puerto Rico early last week to look into an event at an irradiator in Puerto Rico. The upgraded

team, called an Augmented Inspection Team (AIT), will continue its work at Baxter Healthcare

Corporation in Aibonito, Puerto Rico. The irradiator uses radioactive material (sources) to

sterilize a variety of medical devices. 

On April 21, the operators were lowering the source racks back into the pool when one

rack jammed, leaving the radioactive source exposed. Radiation levels outside the irradiator

room remained at normal levels. The NRC Special Inspection Team initially sent to follow up

on this event found that failures of the limit switches led company employees to bypass certain

interlocks in order to enter the irradiator. Two individuals entered the irradiator while the source

was exposed. Initial dose estimates and dosimetry analysis performed for the two individuals

who entered the irradiator while the source rack was exposed indicate that the individuals may

have received a dose of approximately 4.1 rem to the whole body. (The annual occupation dose

limit is 5 rem/year.) Additional efforts aimed at confirming the dose are ongoing. 

The team was upgraded to an Augmented Inspection Team because the event had the

potential to cause an exposure greater than 5 rem to an individual. This heightened level of

inspection includes naming a senior regional manager to lead the team, the addition of a

headquarters based radiation specialist and a greater focus on fact-finding and root cause

analysis. 

The objective of an AIT is to conduct a timely, thorough, and systematic inspection

related to significant operational events at NRC-licensed facilities. The NRC team at Baxter will

assess the health and safety significance of the event. Members will collect, analyze, and

document factual information and evidence sufficient to determine the cause, conditions, and
2

circumstances of the event. The team also will consider the adequacy of the company’s actions

during and in response to the event. 

A written report will be issued within 30 days of the end of the inspection.

###
§ 330.612 Proof of eligibility. ( a ) The CTAP eligible must submit a copy of one of the documents listed under the definition of *displaced* or *surplus* in § 330.602 to establish selection priority under § 330.611.
( b ) The CTAP eligible may also submit a copy of a RIF notice with an offer of another position, accompanied by the signed declination of the offer. The RIF notice must state that declination of the offer will result in separation under RIF procedures.
### §2339a. Cooperative agreements with Indian tribes

The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement with an Indian tribe (or a designated representative of an Indian tribe) to carry out authorized activities of the Corps of Engineers to protect fish, wildlife, water quality, and cultural resources.

(Pub. L. 113–121, title I, §1031(b), June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 113–121, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, YANG Deyu, General Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |               |  |  |  |               |  |                
|----- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------
|Date: |  | June 25, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ YANG Deyu
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Name:         |  | YANG Deyu      
|      |  |               |  |  |  | Title:        |  | General Manager

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### §1801. Congressional statement of purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter to remove the restraints on commerce caused by activities detrimental to migrant and seasonal agricultural workers; to require farm labor contractors to register under this chapter; and to assure necessary protections for migrant and seasonal agricultural workers, agricultural associations, and agricultural employers.

(Pub. L. 97–470, §2, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2584.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 97–470, title V, §524, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2600, provided in part that: "The provisions of this Act [enacting this chapter and repealing chapter 52 (§2041 et seq.) of Title 7, Agriculture] shall take effect ninety days from the date of enactment [Jan. 14, 1983]."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 97–470, §1, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2584, provided in part that this Act [enacting this chapter and repealing chapter 52 (§2041 et seq.) of Title 7, Agriculture] may be cited as the "Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act".
#### Richard J. Cronan, Appellant, v. Otto F. G. Schilling, Defendant. Swiss Bank Corporation, Third-Party Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ. [See 283 App. Div. 655.]