alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1761 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1761

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the seventh day of January, two thousand and three

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 9350 East Corporate Hill Drive in Wichita, Kansas, as the ``Garner E. 
                     Shriver Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 9350 
East Corporate Hill Drive in Wichita, Kansas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Garner E. Shriver Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Garner E. Shriver Post 
Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 210 (Monday, November 1, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 63385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24297]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 15, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. George Arthur Giovanis, Biddeford, Maine; to retain voting 
shares of Pepperell Bancshares Financial Group, Inc., Biddeford, Maine, 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Pepperell Bank and 
Trust, Biddeford, Maine.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Billy Grant Taylor and Raymond Davis King, Jr., both of 
Muskogee, Oklahoma, as co-trustees of the Richard Glen Armstrong, 
Margaret R. Armstrong, and Glen A. Armstrong Trusts; to acquire 
additional voting shares of Armstrong Bancshares, Inc., Muskogee, 
Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of 
Armstrong Bank, Muskogee, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 26, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-24297 Filed 10-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Vanquish Worldwide, LLC ) 

) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91B4N-11-D-7018 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 59175, 59250, 59268 

59269,59270,59492 

Charles R. Lucy, Esq. 

Holland & Hart, LLP 

Colorado Springs, CO 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Nancy J. Lewis, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 6 February 2015 

4~,,v.~-- MARK N. STEMPLER 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59175, 59250, 59268, 59269, 

59270, 59492, Appeals of Vanquish Worldwide, LLC, rendered in conformance with the 

Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 31.2I, Louis Ploth, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Repros Therapeutics Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated:  August 3, 2006 By:  /s/ Louis Ploth, Jr.    Louis Ploth, Jr.         Vice President Business Development andChief Financial OfficerRepros Therapeutics Inc.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: March 11, 2009



| |                                                                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                     
| | /s/ JOHN JOYCE                                                                                      
| | JOHN JOYCE                                                                                          
| | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-06-0193 - Annual Review of the Need for Rulemaking and/or Regulatory Guidance on Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Storage

Accession Number: ML052790609

Date Released: Thursday, September 19, 2002

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML022480322 - SRM-SECY-02-0127 - "Proposed Response to State of Ohio on Its Assured Isolation Storage Facility Draft Rules." (3 page(s), 9/5/2002)
    - ML040290568 - SRM-SECY-03-0223, "Rulemaking Plan: Assured Isolation Facilities." (1 page(s), 1/29/2004)
    - ML061730187 - SECY-06-0193 - Annual Review of the Need for Rulemaking and/or Regulatory Guidance on Low-Level Radioactive Waste Storage (6 page(s), 9/6/2006)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
§ 201.30 Commission review of requests for access to records, for correction or amendment to records, and for accounting of record disclosures. ( a ) The individual who disagrees with the refusal of the Privacy Act Officer or the Inspector General for access to a record, to amend a record, or to obtain an accounting of any record disclosure, may request a review of such refusal by the Commission within 60 days of receipt of the denial of his or her request. A request for review of such a refusal should be addressed to the Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, and shall clearly indicate both on the envelope and in the letter that it is a Privacy Act review request.
( b ) Not later than 30 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the date on which the Commission receives a request for review of the Privacy Act Officer's or the Inspector General's refusal to grant access to a record, to amend a record, or to provide an accounting of a record disclosure, the Commission shall complete such a review and make a final determination thereof unless, for good cause shown, the Commission extends the 30-day period.
( c ) After the individual's request has been reviewed by the Commission, if the Commission agrees with the Privacy Act Officer's or the Inspector General's refusal to grant access to a record, to amend a record, or to provide an accounting of a record disclosure, in accordance with the individual's request, the Commission shall: ( 1 ) Notify the individual in writing of the Commission's decision;
( 2 ) For requests to amend or correct records, advise the individual that he or she has the right to file a concise statement of disagreement with the Commission which sets forth his or her reasons for disagreement with the refusal of the Commission to grant the individual's request; and
( 3 ) Notify the individual of his or her legal right, if any, to judicial review of the Commission's final determination.
( d ) In any disclosure, containing information about which the individual has filed a statement of disagreement regarding an amendment of an individual's record, the Privacy Act Officer, or, for records maintained by the Inspector General, the Inspector General, shall clearly note any portion of the record which is disputed and shall provide copies of the statement and, if the Commission deems it appropriate, copies of a concise statement of the reasons of the Commission for not making the amendments requested, to persons or other agencies to whom the disputed record has been disclosed.
3208 E. Colonial DR. STE 108

Orlando, FL 32803

Aug 7, 2015

US Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) (Docket No. 

FAA−2015−2078).

The Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) to be used by Limitless 

Drones, LLC has been separately submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

Justin Rivera, President/Owner 

Limitless Drones, LLC.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6399-6400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01987]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8171]

Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on February 19 and 20, 
2013. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(5 U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(7)(E), 
it has been determined that the meeting will be closed to the public. 
The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate security policies 
and procedures and will

[[Page 6400]]

involve extensive discussion of trade secrets and proprietary 
commercial information that is privileged and confidential, and will 
discuss law enforcement investigative techniques and procedures. The 
agenda will include updated committee reports, a global threat 
overview, and other matters relating to private sector security 
policies and protective programs and the protection of U.S. business 
information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: January 15, 2013.
Gentry O. Smith,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, Acting, U.S. Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2013-01987 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
No: 23-024 March 14, 2023 

CONTACT: Scott Burnell, 301-415-8200 

NRC Seeks Comment on Proposed Revision to 

Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Renewing Reactor Licenses

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold four additional hybrid meetings around 

the country as the agency seeks comment on a proposed rule to update the agency’s license 

renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement. 

The meetings will be accessible via Microsoft Teams. Those interested in attending 

online should register ahead of time by clicking on the webinar link in the meeting notices 

below. The meetings will be from 6-8 p.m. local time at each location, and the staff will host a 

30-minute open house prior to each meeting. 

The meetings will be: March 28 at the Marriott Chicago Naperville, 1801 N. Naperville 

Blvd. in Naperville, Illinois; March 30 at the Marriott Dallas/Fort Worth Westlake, 1301 Solana 

Blvd., Building 3, in Westlake, Texas; April 4 at the Alloy King of Prussia, 301 West DeKalb 

Pike in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania; and April 6 at the Courtyard by Marriott Atlanta Decatur 

Downtown/Emory, 130 Clairemont Ave. in Decatur, Georgia. 

The proposed rule is in response to a 2022 Commission order that concluded the license 

renewal GEIS did not analyze the environmental impacts of a subsequent license renewal term 

(from 60 to 80 years of operation). The proposed rule amends the relevant rule language to 

account for initial license renewal and one term of subsequent license renewal, redefines the 

number and scope of the environmental issues that must be addressed during the review of each 

application for license renewal, and updates related guidance to fully address subsequent 

renewal.

The GEIS covers environmental topics relevant to all nuclear power plant operators

seeking renewed licenses. The document accounts for new or revised environmental impacts, 

changes in regulations or guidance, and applies what the agency has learned during previous 

license renewals. 

The public meetings are one method for submitting comments before the May 2 deadline. 

Staff will consider the comments before finalizing the rule and GEIS for Commission 

consideration. Comments can also be submitted via regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2018-

0296, via email to Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov, or via mail to Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemaking and Adjudications 

Staff.
### §6. Free passage to harbor of Michigan City, Indiana

The passage of vessels to and from the harbor of Michigan City, in Indiana, shall be free and not subject to toll or charge.

(R.S. §5247.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5247 derived from acts June 23, 1866, ch. 138, §1, 14 Stat. 73; Mar. 2, 1867, ch. 144, §2, 14 Stat. 421.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-05-061 November 9, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS AT SALEM, HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

TO BE DISCUSSED AT NRC MEETING SCHEDULED FOR NOV. 17

Actions taken by PSEG Nuclear, LLC, to improve the safety conscious work environment at the

Salem and Hope Creek nuclear power plants will be the primary subject of a Nuclear Regulatory

Commission public meeting on Thursday, Nov. 17. In addition, NRC staff and plant managers will

discuss PSEG efforts to improve performance in the area of problem identification and resolution at the

facilities, which are located in Hancocks Bridge (Salem County), N.J.

The meeting is scheduled to begin at 7 p.m. at the Bridgeport Holiday Inn, at One Pureland

Drive in Swedesboro, N.J. The hotel is located off Exit 10 of Interstate 295. Members of the public

will be able to observe the NRC-PSEG discussions. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be

available to answer questions from the public regarding the topics.

Safety conscious work environment refers to maintaining an environment in which workers feel

free to raise safety concerns. In the NRC mid-cycle assessment of the Salem and Hope Creek units

issued earlier this year, the agency stated that a cross-cutting issue in the area of safety conscious work

environment would remain open until PSEG has concluded that substantial, sustainable progress has

been made. Further, the NRC will need to complete a review confirming PSEG’s assessment results. 

(A cross-cutting issue is one that affects several different areas of performance.) 

The mid-cycle assessment also determined that a cross-cutting issue in the area of problem

identification and resolution for the plants would remain open. This was based on additional

inspection findings and documented shortcomings in this area in 2004.

Under a Deviation Memo approved in late July, the NRC is continuing to devote additional

resources to reviewing performance at the plants.

“The upcoming meeting will provide a good opportunity for us to discuss whether the

company’s efforts are yielding the kind of meaningful and lasting results that are needed,” NRC Region

I Administrator Samuel J. Collins said. “Until that occurs, we intend to maintain additional oversight

at the Salem and Hope Creek plants involving, among other things, enhanced baseline inspections,

regular reviews of the company’s plans and periodic management meetings like the one scheduled for

November 17th.”
More information about the NRC’s oversight of the plants is available on the agency’s web site

at: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plant-specific-items/hope-creek-salem-issues.html .

###
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

FRANKLIN FINANCE CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                              FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                                                   DECEMBER 31,
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  2001              2000               1999
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>                     <C>                  <C>


Net income                                                        $ 3,092,256       $ 2,847,455         $ 2,467,247
Fixed charges:
Income before fixed charges                                         3,092,256         2,847,455           2,467,247
Fixed charges, as above
Preferred stock dividend requirements                               1,800,900         1,800,900           1,800,900
Fixed charges and preferred stock dividends                         1,800,900         1,800,900           1,800,900
Ratio of income to fixed charges
    and prefered stock dividend requirements                             1.72              1.58                1.37


</TABLE>



                                       36