alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Financial  Statements  for the six month period  ending June 30, 1999
included in the Company's Form 10-Q filed  September 2, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000895921
<NAME>                   BE INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000


<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                                          1,318
<SECURITIES>                                    2,335
<RECEIVABLES>                                     242
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,154
<PP&E>                                          1,118
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (560)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,213
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          38,268
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            5
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,531)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,401
<SALES>                                           846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  846
<CGS>                                             324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (74)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (3.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.07)



</TABLE>
§ 2422.16 May parties enter into election agreements, and if they do not will the Regional Director direct an election? ( a ) *Election agreements.* Parties are encouraged to enter into election agreements.
( b ) *Regional Director directed election.* If the parties are unable to agree on procedural matters, specifically, the eligibility period, method of election, dates, hours, or locations of the election, the Regional Director will decide election procedures and issue a Direction of Election, without prejudice to the rights of a party to file objections to the procedural conduct of the election.
( c ) *Opportunity for a hearing.* Before directing an election, the Regional Director must provide affected parties an opportunity for a hearing on non-procedural matters, and then may: ( 1 ) Issue a Decision and Order; or
( 2 ) If there are no questions regarding unit appropriateness, issue a Direction of Election without a Decision and Order.
( d ) *Challenges or objections to a directed election.* A Direction of Election issued under this section will be issued without prejudice to the right of a party to file a challenge to the eligibility of any person participating in the election and/or objections to the election.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

            Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Talon International, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report
of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

         (1)      the  10-K  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (2)      the information  contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 14, 2008                      /S/ LONNIE D. SCHNELL
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Lonnie D. Schnell
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9988-20-Region 6]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of a final decision on a UIC no migration petition reissuance.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to the Land Disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has been granted to TMCC for a Class I hazardous waste injection well located at their Corpus Christi, Texas facility. The company has adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the EPA by the petition reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision allows the underground injection by TMCC of the specific restricted hazardous wastes identified in this exemption reissuance request, into Class I hazardous waste injection well WDW-70 until December 31, 2028, unless the EPA moves to terminate this exemption. Additional conditions included in this final decision may be reviewed by contacting the EPA Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public notice was issued August 28, 2018, and the public comment period closed on October 15, 2018, and no comments were received. This decision constitutes final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal.

# DATES:

This action is effective as of November 19, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent information relating thereto are on file at the following location:

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Division, Safe Drinking Water Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/UIC Section, EPA—Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

Dated: November 19, 2018.

Charles W. Maguire,

Director, Water Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-27483 Filed 12-18-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11.1

                         SIMIONE CENTRAL HOLDINGS, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                           ---------------------------
                                                               1996           1997
                                                           -----------     -----------
                                                                  (unaudited)
<S>                                                        <C>             <C>        
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:

Net income (loss) available to common stockholders         $  (394,801)    $   643,134
                                                           ===========     ===========


Weighted average shares outstanding                          6,568,363      11,954,306
Add additional shares issuable upon exercise of
      common stock options and warrants                           --         2,773,209
                                                           -----------     -----------

Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding                 6,568,363      14,727,515
                                                           ===========     ===========
Net income (loss) per share                                $     (0.06)    $      0.04
                                                           ===========     ===========
</TABLE>



Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented because fully diluted
earnings (loss) per share amounts do not differ significantly from primary
earnings per share.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6293

In Re: ALEXANDER CAMERON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Submitted: March 23, 2005 Decided: April 6, 2005 Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Cameron, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alexander Cameron petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order to compel Judge Donald M. Haddock of the Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, Virginia, to summon and allow Cameron to confront the person who conducted DNA testing on alleged evidence stemming from Cameron’s 1987 criminal conviction. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. See Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). The relief sought by Cameron is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-03-021 March 28, 2003

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

 

NRC TO MEET WITH TVA OFFICIALS TO DISCUSS SAFETY

PERFORMANCE AT BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority 

officials on Thursday, April 3, to discuss the results of NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance

at the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant near Athens, Alabama.

The meeting will be held at 3:00 p.m. (CST) at the Browns Ferry Training Center at the plant

site. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be available before the

conclusion of the meeting to answer any questions.

A letter from the NRC to TVA addresses plant safety performance during the previous year

and forms the basis for the meeting discussions. The letter states that, overall, Browns Ferry operated

in a manner that preserved public health and safety and that plant performance was at a level requiring

no additional NRC inspection beyond the normal baseline activities. The letter, which is available

from Region II Public Affairs and on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/bf_2002q4.pdf , says the NRC staff will also

conduct inspections of the plant’s implementation of NRC security advisories and Orders, inspections

of construction activities for the plant’s Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, and inspections of

the Unit 1 recovery project activities.

 Current performance indicators for the two operating units at the Browns Ferry plant are

available at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF2/bf2_chart.html and

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/BF3/bf3_chart.html

###
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Maternity Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Judd P. Tirnauer, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ JUDD P. TIRNAUER                           
|Judd P. Tirnauer                               
|Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
|August 9, 2010                                 



34
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 15, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132284 & (53) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132284 

 COA: 267976 

Sanilac CC: 05-006016-FC 

THOMAS JAMES EARLS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals 

is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the 

application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the 

parties shall address whether the defendant has standing to challenge evidence seized in 

violation of MCL 767A.1 et seq. and, if so, whether the violation of that statutory 

provision authorizes exclusion of the evidence, in light of People v Hawkins, 468 Mich 

488, 507 (2003), and People v Anstey, 476 Mich 436, 448 (2006). The parties may file 

supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid 

submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers. 

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

s1212 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 15, 2006 

Clerk
#### §§ 201.161-201.169 [Reserved]
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 7 

To make a technical amendment to the Violence Against Women Act of 

1994, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2022 

Ms. HIRONO introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 

read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To make a technical amendment to the Violence Against 

Women Act of 1994, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VAWA Technical 

5 Amendment Act of 2022’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS TO COMBAT VIOLENT CRIMES. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 2001(d) of title I of the 

8 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 

9 U.S.C. 10441(d)) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 7 CPS

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘or 

2 Native Hawaiian’’ after ‘‘Indian’’; 

3 (B) in subparagarph (B), by inserting ‘‘or 

4 Native Hawaiian’’ after ‘‘Indian’’; 

5 (C) in subparagraph (C)— 

6 (i) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian 

7 communities’’ after ‘‘tribal communities’’; 

8 and 

9 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian’’ 

10 after ‘‘Indian’’; and 

11 (D) in subparagraph (D)— 

12 (i) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian 

13 communities’’ after ‘‘Indian tribes’’; and 

14 (ii) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian’’ 

15 after ‘‘against Indian’’; 

16 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

17 (A) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by inserting 

18 ‘‘or Native Hawaiian communities’’ after ‘‘In19 dian tribes’’; and 

20 (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ‘‘or 

21 Native Hawaiian communities’’ after ‘‘Indian 

22 tribes’’; and 

23 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(6) NATIVE HAWAIIAN DEFINED.—In this sub25 section, the term ‘Native Hawaiian’ has the meaning 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 7 CPS

1 given that term in section 801 of the Native Amer2 ican Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act 

3 of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4221).’’. 

4 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

5 Section 40002(a)(42) of the Violence Against Women Act 

6 of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(42)) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (A)— 

8 (A) by inserting ‘‘, Native Hawaiian orga9 nizations, or the Native Hawaiian community’’ 

10 after ‘‘Indian service providers’’; 

11 (B) by inserting ‘‘, organizations, or com12 munities’’ after ‘‘member providers’’; and 

13 (C) by inserting ‘‘or Native Hawaiian’’ 

14 after ‘‘designed to assist Indian’’; and 

15 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

16 (A) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘, organiza17 tions, or communities’’ after ‘‘member service 

18 providers’’; and 

19 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘or Native 

20 Hawaiian communities’’ after ‘‘tribal commu21 nities’’. 

22 SEC. 3. 

23 This Act shall become effective one day after enact24 ment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### §512. Obstruction of navigation

No bridge shall at any time unreasonably obstruct the free navigation of any navigable waters of the United States.

(June 21, 1940, ch. 409, §2, 54 Stat. 498.)
### §2317b. Mitigation banks and in-lieu fee arrangements

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after December 16, 2016, the Secretary shall issue implementation guidance that provides for the consideration in water resources development feasibility studies of the entire amount of potential in-kind credits available at mitigation banks approved by the Secretary and in-lieu fee programs with an approved service area that includes the location of the projected impacts of the water resources development project.

#### (2) Requirements

All potential mitigation bank and in-lieu fee credits that meet the criteria under paragraph (1) shall be considered a reasonable alternative for planning purposes if—

(A) the applicable mitigation bank—

(i) has an approved mitigation banking instrument; and

(ii) has completed a functional analysis of the potential credits using the approved Corps of Engineers certified habitat assessment model specific to the region; and

(B) the Secretary determines that the use of such banks or in-lieu fee programs provide reasonable assurance that the statutory (and regulatory) mitigation requirements for a water resources development project are met, including monitoring or demonstrating mitigation success.

#### (3) Effect

Nothing in this subsection—

(A) modifies or alters any requirement for a water resources development project to comply with applicable laws or regulations, including section 2283 of this title; or

(B) shall be construed as to limit mitigation alternatives or require the use of mitigation banks or in-lieu fee programs.

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2036(c), Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1094; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1163, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–322 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to use of the mitigation bank for certain water resources projects that involved wetlands mitigation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2004, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), the National Multi Housing Council (“NMHC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: National Multi Housing Council, Washington, DC. The nature and scope of NMHC's standards development activities are: To develop and promulgate open and voluntary standards for the apartment industry, thereby assisting the members of the industry and their business partners with the electronic exchange of information and enhancing the efficient operation of their businesses.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 04-24576  Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M