alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1326. Thermal discharges

#### (a) Effluent limitations that will assure protection and propagation of balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife

With respect to any point source otherwise subject to the provisions of section 1311 of this title or section 1316 of this title, whenever the owner or operator of any such source, after opportunity for public hearing, can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Administrator (or, if appropriate, the State) that any effluent limitation proposed for the control of the thermal component of any discharge from such source will require effluent limitations more stringent than necessary to assure the projection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife in and on the body of water into which the discharge is to be made, the Administrator (or, if appropriate, the State) may impose an effluent limitation under such sections for such plant, with respect to the thermal component of such discharge (taking into account the interaction of such thermal component with other pollutants), that will assure the protection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife in and on that body of water.

#### (b) Cooling water intake structures

Any standard established pursuant to section 1311 of this title or section 1316 of this title and applicable to a point source shall require that the location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact.

#### (c) Period of protection from more stringent effluent limitations following discharge point source modification commenced after October 18, 1972

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any point source of a discharge having a thermal component, the modification of which point source is commenced after October 18, 1972, and which, as modified, meets effluent limitations established under section 1311 of this title or, if more stringent, effluent limitations established under section 1313 of this title and which effluent limitations will assure protection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife in or on the water into which the discharge is made, shall not be subject to any more stringent effluent limitation with respect to the thermal component of its discharge during a ten year period beginning on the date of completion of such modification or during the period of depreciation or amortization of such facility for the purpose of section 167 or 169 (or both) of title 26, whichever period ends first.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title III, §316, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 876; amended Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.
### §136b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 17, 1947, ch. 262, 61 Stat. 372, related to maximum salary for any position in the Library. See section 162a of this title.
### §1350. Criminal penalty

An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government knowingly and willfully violating section 1341(a) or 1342 of this title shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 926.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1350 | 31:665(i)(1)(words after semicolon related to (a), (b)). | R.S. §3679(i)(1)(words after semicolon related to (a), (b)); Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §4(1st par.), 33 Stat. 1257; Feb. 27, 1906, ch. 510, §3, 34 Stat. 48; restated Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, §1211, 64 Stat. 768. |

The words "District of Columbia government" are added because of section 47–105 of the D.C. Code. The words "upon conviction" are omitted as surplus.
§ 230.401 Agency authority to take personnel actions in a national emergency disaster. ( a ) Upon an attack on the United States, agencies are authorized to carry out whatever personnel activities may be necessary to the effective functioning of their organizations during a period of disaster without regard to any regulation or instruction of OPM, except those which become effective upon or following an attack on the United States. This authority applies only to actions under OPM jurisdiction.
( b ) Actions taken under this section shall be consistent with affected regulations and instructions as far as possible under the circumstances and shall be discontinued as soon as conditions permit the reapplication of the affected regulations and instructions.
( c ) An employee may not acquire a competitive civil service status by virtue of any action taken under this section.
( d ) Actions taken, and authority to take actions, under this section may be adjusted or terminated in whole or in part by OPM.
( e ) Agencies shall maintain records of the actions taken under this section.
[35 FR 5173, Mar. 27, 1970]
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Alexander J. Bates et al., as Executors of Kahl C. Bates, Deceased, Appellants, to Settle the Account of Kahl C. Bates, as Executor and Trustee of Walter T. Chatterley, Deceased. Lafayette National Bank of Brooklyn in New York, as Substituted Trustee under the Will of Walter T. Chatterley, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §1377a. Green infrastructure promotion

#### (a) In general

The Administrator shall promote the use of green infrastructure in, and coordinate the integration of green infrastructure into, permitting and enforcement under this chapter, planning efforts, research, technical assistance, and funding guidance of the Environmental Protection Agency.

#### (b) Coordination of efforts

The Administrator shall ensure that the Office of Water coordinates efforts to increase the use of green infrastructure with—

(1) other Federal departments and agencies;

(2) State, tribal, and local governments; and

(3) the private sector.

#### (c) Regional green infrastructure promotion

The Administrator shall direct each regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency, as appropriate based on local factors, and consistent with the requirements of this chapter, to promote and integrate the use of green infrastructure within the region, including through—

(1) outreach and training regarding green infrastructure implementation for State, tribal, and local governments, tribal communities, and the private sector; and

(2) the incorporation of green infrastructure into permitting and other regulatory programs, codes, and ordinance development, including the requirements under consent decrees and settlement agreements in enforcement actions.

#### (d) Green infrastructure information-sharing

The Administrator shall promote green infrastructure information-sharing, including through an internet website, to share information with, and provide technical assistance to, State, tribal, and local governments, tribal communities, the private sector, and the public, regarding green infrastructure approaches for—

(1) reducing water pollution;

(2) protecting water resources;

(3) complying with regulatory requirements; and

(4) achieving other environmental, public health, and community goals.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title V, §519, as added Pub. L. 115–436, §5(b)(2), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5561.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 519 of act June 30, 1948, was renumbered section 520 and is set out as a note under section 1251 of this title.
§ 2606.205 Response to a request for review of an initial denial of access. ( a ) If the OGE Director or agency reviewing official determines that access to the records should be granted, the response will state how access will be provided if the records are not included with the response.
( b ) Any decision that either partially or fully affirms the initial decision to deny access shall inform the requester of the right to seek judicial review of the decision in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) of the Privacy Act.
#### Michael Power, Respondent, v. Elinora M. Wagner, Appellant. John R. Carpenter Company and George M. O’Connor, Respondents.

We think the proofs taken on the trial do not support the judgment. In view of the unusual situation presented by this case, we deem it in the interests of justice to grant a new trial. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
#### Katie Mehrer, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frank Mehrer, Deceased, Appellant, v. North Ninth Lumber Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 62—CONSOLIDATED FEDERAL FUNDS REPORT**

Sec.
6201.
Definitions.
6202.
Content, form, and data for report.
6203.
Printing and distribution of reports and machine-readable records.
6204.
Delegation.
6205.
Availability of information.
6206.
Data consistency and uniformity of data elements.
6207.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this chapter were contained in Pub. L. 97–326, Oct. 15, 1982, 96 Stat. 1607, as amended, which was set out as a note under section 6102 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–547, §2(d), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3060, eff. May 1, 1986.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. I-05-049 September 20, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC PERFORMING SPECIAL INSPECTION AT INDIAN POINT 2 NUCLEAR PLANT;

SMALL AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE FROM SPENT FUEL POOL AREA UNDER REVIEW

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has initiated a special inspection into leakage from the

spent fuel pool area at the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant. The leakage, which was discovered

recently at the Buchanan, N.Y., facility, is minimal and does not pose any immediate health or safety

concern for members of the public or plant workers.

An NRC health physics specialist, who arrived on site last week, and the NRC’s two Resident

Inspectors at Indian Point 2 have been closely following the actions of Entergy, which owns and

operates the plant. The special inspection, chartered by the NRC, will be conducted by the health

physics specialist and additional agency inspectors, as appropriate.

Spent fuel pools are deep, water-filled storage structures designed to hold the fuel assemblies

that have been used in the reactor. Containing hundreds of thousands of gallons of cooling water, these

pools have stainless-steel liners surrounded by steel-reinforced concrete walls measuring several feet in

thickness.

During recent excavation work being done in conjunction with the dry cask spent fuel storage

project, workers identified several hairline cracks on concrete walls for the Indian Point 2 pool. Slight

seepage has been collected. It is not yet clear whether the seepage is from a current or prior leak.

The leakage is estimated to be very small. For example, recent efforts by plant staff to collect

leakage have yielded less than a pint per day. Samples of soil in the vicinity of where the leakage was

found indicate that radioactive contamination is limited to an area in close proximity to the cracking.

The NRC team will, among other things, review the company’s evaluation of the pool structure,

evaluate remedial actions on the part of the company, and assess any potential environmental impact of

the leakage. The team will issue a report documenting its findings within 45 days of the completion of

the inspection.

###
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-017 January 28, 2005

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET FEB. 10-11 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting Feb. 10-11 in Rockville, Md., to discuss an 8 percent power uprate request for Entergy

Operation’s Waterford Nuclear Plant in Louisiana. The committee will also discuss, among other

items, the draft Safety Evaluation Report related to the proposed MOX (mixed oxide) Fuel Fabrication

Facility at the Savannah River Site.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. The meeting will run from 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. each day. A complete agenda

will be available on the NRC’s Web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2005/ .

Individuals with questions or those wanting to make public statements during the meeting

should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364.

###
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10579

Summary Calendar

__________________

DANIEL CURRAN,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ROBERT B.

REICH, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department

of Labor, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-1158-T

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Daniel Curran appeals from two orders of the district court. 

This court does not have jurisdiction over the district court's

order entered on June 28, 1995. See EEOC v. Kerrville Bus Co.

Inc., 925 F.2d 129, 131-33 (5th Cir. 1991). Curran challenges

the district court's order, entered on June 21, 1995, which

denied in part Curran's requests for injunctive relief. After a

careful review of the record and the appellate arguments, we 
No. 95-10579

-2-

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying the requests. See White v. Carlucci, 862 F.2d 1209, 1213

(5th Cir. 1989); Parks v. Dunlop, 517 F.2d 785, 787 (5th Cir.

1975).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 167 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 167

   To take certain steps toward recognition by the United States of 
                  Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2003

 Mr. Reynolds (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Israel, Mr. 
 Holden, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Weller, 
     Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Souder, Mr. Otter, Mr. Cantor, and Mr. Wamp) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To take certain steps toward recognition by the United States of 
                  Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES POLICY REGARDING JERUSALEM AS THE CAPITAL OF 
              ISRAEL.

    (a) Limitation on Operation of Consulate in Jerusalem.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the United States shall not 
operate a United States consulate or diplomatic facility in Jerusalem 
unless such consulate or diplomatic facility is under the supervision 
of the United States Ambassador to Israel.
    (b) Identification of Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel in 
Official Government Documents.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, any official document of the United States Government which lists 
countries and their capital cities shall identify Jerusalem as the 
capital of Israel.
    (c) Record of Place of Birth as Israel for Passport Purposes.--For 
purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or 
issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of 
Jerusalem, the Secretary of State shall, upon the request of the 
citizen or the citizen's legal guardian, record the place of birth as 
Israel.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Silberberg Fabric Corporation, Respondent, and Atlanta Woolen Mills Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 996.]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.56

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

         This Termination Agreement (this "Agreement") is signed in 27 November,
2003 between the following two parties.

PARTY A:          LINKTONE LTD.
ADDRESS:          Cayman Islands in British West Indies

PARTY B:          DU MINSHENG
ADDRESS:          Room 601, No. 10, Lane 288, Macao Road, Shanghai

         1. WHEREAS, Party A and Party B signed the equity pledge agreement (the
"Equity Pledge Agreement") in April 28th, 2003.

         2. WHEREAS, Party A and Party B intent to terminate the Equity Pledge
Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, both parties agree as follows:

1.       Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Equity Pledge Agreement and
         the Equity Pledge Agreement shall terminate automatically upon this
         Agreement coming into effect.

2.       Rights and obligations of Party A and Party B under the Equity Pledge
         Agreement shall terminate upon the termination of the Equity Pledge
         Agreement.

3.       This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of execution.

4.       This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of People's Republic of
         China.

5.       This Agreement is executed in Chinese and English in duplicate, and in
         case of conflicts, the Chinese version shall prevail.

PARTY A: LINKTONE LTD.

Representative: /s/ Jun Wu

PARTY B: /s/ Du Minsheng

                                       1
#### In the Matter of Arthur E. Brodie et al., Appellants, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, et al., Respondents. (Consolidated Proceedings.)

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse the determination of the Temporary State Housing Rent Administrator.
### **CHAPTER 32—INLAND WATERWAYS TRUST FUND**

Sec.
1801, 1802. Repealed.
1803.
Study with respect to inland waterway user taxes and charges.
1804.
Inland and intracoastal waterways of the United States.
### §36. Subdivisions of 10-acre tracts; maximum of placer locations; homestead claims of agricultural lands; sale of improvements

Legal subdivisions of forty acres may be subdivided into ten-acre tracts; and two or more persons, or associations of persons, having contiguous claims of any size, although such claims may be less than ten acres each, may make joint entry thereof; but no location of a placer claim, made after the 9th day of July 1870, shall exceed one hundred and sixty acres for any one person or association of persons, which location shall conform to the United States surveys; and nothing in this section contained shall defeat or impair any bona fide homestead claim upon agricultural lands, or authorize the sale of the improvements of any bona fide settler to any purchaser.

(R.S. §2330; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §4, 26 Stat. 1097.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2330 derived from act July 9, 1870, ch. 235, §12, 16 Stat. 217.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of Title 43, Public Lands.
#### In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings of Louis Rosenthal, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Rose Rachlin, Appellant.

Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to a judge of said court to fix the time and place for the judgment debtor to appear for examination under the orders of May first and May fourth. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 110–800 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 6599) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JULY 29, 2008.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. CASTOR, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1384] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1384, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6599), 

the Military Construction and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Act, 

2009, under an open rule with a preprinting requirement. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Appropriations. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution waives 

points of order against provisions of the bill for failure to comply 

with clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule provides that no amendment 

to the bill shall be in order except those printed in the portion of 

the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 

of rule XVIII by July 30 and except pro forma amendments for the 

purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only 

by the Member who caused it to be printed or a designee and shall 

be considered as read. The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. Finally, the resolution permits 

the Chair, during consideration of the bill in the House, to postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the 

Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

(except clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI) is prophylactic as the ComVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:10 Jul 30, 2008 Jkt 069006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR800.XXX HR800

jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
2 

mittee is not aware of any such points of order. The waiver of 

clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or 

legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) against provisions 

in the bill is included because the bill contains unauthorized appropriations and legislative provisions. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 580 

Date: July 29, 2008. 

Measure: H.R. 6599. 

Motion by: Mr. Dreier. 

Summary of motion: To provide an open rule. 

Results: Defeated 2–6. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Welch—Nay; 

Castor—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Dreier—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; 

Slaughter—Nay. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS