alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-130 September 14, 2005

NRC ISSUES DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON PROPOSED

ENRICHMENT PLANT IN OHIO, ANNOUNCES PUBLIC MEETING

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued its draft environmental impact statement on a

proposed gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant in Piketon, Ohio, concluding there would be small

to moderate impacts on traffic, air pollution and the local economy.

NRC staff will hold a public meeting Sept. 29 at the Vern Riffe Career Technology Center, 175

Beaver Creek Rd., in Piketon, to discuss the findings and receive written and oral public comments.

The meeting will run from 7 p.m. to 9:45 p.m., and a transcription will subsequently be posted on the

NRC Web site. NRC staff members will be available for informal discussion an hour before the

meeting.

USEC Inc. submitted its application to construct and operate the American Centrifuge Plant in

August 2004. The plant would be located on land leased from the U.S. Department of Energy at DOE’s

Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant site in Piketon.

The draft environmental impact statement categorizes potential impacts of the plant in three

ways: “Small” impacts are not detectable or are so minor that they would neither destabilize nor

noticeably alter the environment. “Moderate” impacts are sufficient to noticeably alter but not

destabilize a resource, while “large” impacts are clearly noticeable and sufficient to destabilize a

resource.

The draft study describes small-to-moderate socioeconomic impacts of the proposed plant.

Specifically, an estimated 3,362 full-time jobs would be created in the area from 2006 to 2010 as a

result of plant construction. During operation from 2010 to 2040, about 1,500 jobs would be created in

the Piketon area. The study also notes moderate socioeconomic impacts to Paducah, Ky., where USEC

is expected to terminate operations at its gaseous diffusion enrichment plant once the Piketon

centrifuge plant begins production.

The draft study also notes small-to-moderate impacts on traffic along the two main roads in the

Piketon area, especially during construction of the centrifuge plant. Air quality may also be affected by

dust and other particulate matter kicked up in an area that already sees similar impacts from agriculture.

Impacts on geology, water resources, noise and public occupational health and safety, among others, 

are also discussed.
The draft environmental impact statement is available for public viewing and comment on the

NRC’s Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1834/ . Public

comments will be accepted through Oct. 24. Comments may be submitted to the Chief, Rules Review

and Directives Branch, Mail Stop T6-D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

20555-0001; or by e-mail at NRCREP@nrc.gov, or by fax to (301) 415-5397, attention Matthew

Blevins. Comments should note Docket No. 70-7004.

###
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

ANTHONY ROBERT SAFIAN §

Petitioner, §

VS. § NO. PD-0324-16

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

Respondent. §

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING OF BRIEF ON

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

This motion is brought by ANTHONY ROBERT SAFIAN, Petitioner, who

pursuant to rules 38.6 and 68.2( c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

requests that this Court grant an extension of time for filing of Petitioner’s Brief on

Petition for Discretionary Review and in support would show the following:

I.

Petitioner’s brief is due on September 23, 2016. The time for extension

requested is thirty (30) days.

II.

Because of an unusually heavy caseload consisting of both jury trials as well

as other appellate obligations, counsel for Appellant has been unable to complete

said brief; as a result of trial preparation and actual trial, counsel for Appellant has

been unable to devote a sufficient amount of time to the preparation of said brief.

As a result of the aforementioned activities counsel for Appellant, reasonably

believes that the brief will be filed with this Court within thirty (30) days of the

September 23, 2016, date.

III.

No previous “Motion to Extend Time for Filing Petitioner’s Brief on Petitioner

for Discretionary Review” has been granted.

Motion to Extend Time for Filing of Petitioner’s Brief

on Petition for Discretionary Review Page 1 of 3

PD-0323&0324&0325-16

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 9/23/2016 5:33:34 PM

Accepted 9/26/2016 9:10:13 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
IV.

The Appellant is incarcerated.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant,ANTHONY ROBERT

SAFIAN, prays this Court will grant an extension of thirty (30) days for Appellant

to file said brief.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Daniel Collins

Daniel Collins

TBN: 24071079

Daniel Collins Law

3663 Airport Freeway

Fort Worth, Texas 76111

Phone: (682) 444-1004

Fax: (817) 886-2215

E-mail: Daniel@DanielCollinslaw.com

Attorney for Petitioner

Anthony Robert Safian

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I do hereby certify that a conference was held on September 23, 2016,

with the Tarrant County District Attorney’s office, and that office stated that

it is not opposed to the granting of the relief requested in this motion.

/s/ Daniel Collins

Daniel Collins

Motion to Extend Time for Filing of Petitioner’s Brief

on Petition for Discretionary Review Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument

has been furnished to counsel for the Appellees listed below pursuant to Rule

9.5(b)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure through the electronic

filing manager, as opposing counsel’s email address is on file with the

electronic filing manager, on this 23rd day of September , 2015.

/s/ Daniel Collins

Daniel Collins

Debra Windsor

Tarrant Co. District Atty’s Office

401 West Belknap

Fort Worth, Texas 76196

Motion to Extend Time for Filing of Petitioner’s Brief

on Petition for Discretionary Review Page 3 of 3
### §§221 to 222i. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections expired by their own terms. They provided as follows:

Section 221, acts Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, §13, 41 Stat. 441; Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 599, §1, 49 Stat. 674, provided for prospecting permits, their terms and conditions, extension, location of lands, marking land, notice of application for permits, permits in Alaska, exchanging permits for leases, and limited extensions to Dec. 31, 1938.

Section 222, act Jan. 11, 1922, ch. 28, 42 Stat. 356, authorized Secretary of the Interior to extend time for drilling not to exceed three years.

Section 222a, act Apr. 5, 1926, ch. 107, §1, 44 Stat. 236, authorized a further extension of two years for drilling.

Section 222b, act Apr. 5, 1926, ch. 107, §2, 44 Stat. 236, provided for extension of expired permits for a period of two years from Apr. 5, 1926.

Section 222c, act Mar. 9, 1928, ch. 168, §1, 45 Stat. 252, authorized a two year extension for permits.

Section 222d, act Mar. 9, 1928, ch. 168, §2, 45 Stat. 252, authorized a two year extension of permits already expired.

Section 222e, act Jan. 23, 1930, ch. 25, §1, 46 Stat. 58, provided that permits issued or extended for three years might be further for three years.

Section 222f, act Jan. 23, 1930, ch. 25, §2, 46 Stat. 59, provided for an extension of permits already expired for a period of three years from Jan. 23, 1930.

Section 222g, act June 30, 1932, ch. 319, §1, 47 Stat. 445, provided for a further extension of three years.

Section 222h, act June 30, 1932, ch. 319, §2, 47 Stat. 446, authorized an extension, for permits already expired, of three years from June 30, 1932.

Section 222i, acts Aug. 26, 1937, ch. 828, 50 Stat. 842; Aug. 11, 1939, ch. 716, 53 Stat. 1418, provided for final extension of prospecting permits, outstanding on Dec. 31, 1937, to Dec. 31, 1939.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Compromise of Claims for Accrued Rental

Act July 29, 1942, ch. 534, §2, 56 Stat. 726, authorized Secretary of the Interior to make a compromise settlement of any claim for accrued rental under a lease issued pursuant to the provisions of section 221 of this title, in any case in which he determined that it would be financially beneficial to the United States to make such a compromise settlement or in any case in which he determined that collection of the full amount of such accrued rental from the lessee was inadvisable because of the lessee's financial resources being limited.
### §2330a. Monitoring ecosystem restoration

#### (a) In general

In conducting a feasibility study for a project (or a component of a project) for ecosystem restoration, the Secretary shall ensure that the recommended project includes, as an integral part of the project, a plan for monitoring the success of the ecosystem restoration.

#### (b) Monitoring plan

The monitoring plan shall—

(1) include a description of the monitoring activities to be carried out, the criteria for ecosystem restoration success, and the estimated cost and duration of the monitoring; and

(2) specify that the monitoring shall continue until such time as the Secretary determines that the criteria for ecosystem restoration success will be met.

#### (c) Cost share

For a period of 10 years from completion of construction of a project (or a component of a project) for ecosystem restoration, the Secretary shall consider the cost of carrying out the monitoring as a project cost. If the monitoring plan under subsection (b) requires monitoring beyond the 10-year period, the cost of monitoring shall be a non-Federal responsibility.

#### (d) Inclusions

A monitoring plan under subsection (b) shall include a description of—

(1) the types and number of restoration activities to be conducted;

(2) the physical action to be undertaken to achieve the restoration objectives of the project;

(3) the functions and values that will result from the restoration plan; and

(4) a contingency plan for taking corrective actions in cases in which monitoring demonstrates that restoration measures are not achieving ecological success in accordance with criteria described in the monitoring plan.

#### (e) Conclusion of operation and maintenance responsibility

The responsibility of a non-Federal interest for operation and maintenance of the nonstructural and nonmechanical elements of a project, or a component of a project, for ecosystem restoration shall cease 10 years after the date on which the Secretary makes a determination of success under subsection (b)(2).

#### (f) Federal obligations

The Secretary is not responsible for the operation or maintenance of any components of a project with respect to which a non-Federal interest is released from obligations under subsection (e).

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, §2039, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1100; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1161, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1668.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2016—Subsecs. (d) to (f). Pub. L. 114–322 added subsecs. (d) to (f).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1610 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1610

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, as the ``Walt Disney 
                        Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1610

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 120 East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, as the ``Walt Disney 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 120 
East Ritchie Avenue in Marceline, Missouri, and known as the Marceline 
Main Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Walt Disney Post 
Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Walt Disney Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jean Paul Roy,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean
Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean Paul
Roy


President
and Chief Executive Officer


August
11, 2008
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-04-046 August 13, 2004

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC SAYS FLORIDA NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

PREPARED FOR HURRICANE CHARLEY

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Atlanta said Friday morning that Florida’s three

commercial nuclear power plants have made preparations for response to Hurricane Charley. 

Charles A. Casto, acting Regional Administrator of the agency’s Region II office in Atlanta,

said the NRC has activated its Atlanta Incident Response Center to monitor and assist Florida’s nuclear

power plants at Crystal River, St. Lucie, and Turkey Point. He said additional NRC personnel have

already been dispatched where needed to the plants and to Florida’s Emergency Response Center in

Tallahassee. 

Casto said Friday morning that the agency’s primary focus is on the Crystal River nuclear

power plant, located about 90 miles north of Tampa on the Gulf coast. He said the plant has declared a

Notice of Unusual Event, the lowest of NRC’s emergency declarations, and is prepared to shut down if

necessary. The Unusual Event declaration is routine in the event of a hurricane, and the plant’s

procedures require that it be shut down should hurricane winds reach Category III, which is 111 miles

per hour or higher. The plant has emergency diesel generators available if needed and has additional

diesel generators, normally used in routine operations, and emergency battery power available should

the need arise. 

The Crystal River nuclear power plant is elevated some 20 feet above sea level, he said, above

any predicted storm surge. It is part of a power generating complex near the town of Crystal River

which contains four coal-fired plants in addition to the nuclear unit.

Casto said the NRC regional office in Atlanta will maintain close contact with the agency’s

Washington, D. C. headquarters, Florida state officials and the plant sites until the hurricane threat has

passed.

###
### §548. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 467, §7, 43 Stat. 1191, required a report on projects adopted prior to March 3, 1925.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 15416 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15

- cv
- 04477

- MHC

ALEXANDER HARVIN,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.,
Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________ ( August 25, 2017 )
Before TJOFLAT , MARTIN and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CU RIAM:

Case: 16-15416 Date Filed: 08/25/2017 Page: 1 of 32 On May 29, 2003, Alexander Harvin bought a residence in Conyers, Georgia, with the proceeds of a mortg age loan he obtained from SouthTrust Mortgage Corporation. On October 11, 2013, JP Morgan Chase Bank NA (“Chase”) became the assignee of the mortgage. On July 3 , 2014, Harvin sued Nationwide Title Clearing, Chase , and others in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia , claiming that the assignment to Chase was invalid and seeking damages on the theory that Chase “violated the [Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692(e)] by attempting to foreclose on his home without holding a valid security interest in it.” Harvin v. Nationwide Title Clearing , 632 Fed. App’x 599 (11th Cir. 2016). The District Court dismissed his lawsuit, and Harvin appealed. While the appeal was pending, 1 Harvin returned to the Distr ict Court on December 29, 2015, and filed this action, seeking to enforce the rescission of the
2003 mortgage loan he had allegedly perfected pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1635(a) , and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder , when Chase failed to respond to the notice of rescission he delivered to Chase on February 2,
2015.

1 We affirmed the District Court’ s dismissal of Harvin’s case on January 28, 2016. Harvin v. Nationwide Title Clearing, 632 Fed. App ’x 599 (11th Cir. 2016).

Case: 16-15416 Date Filed: 08/25/2017 Page: 2 of 33 Chase responded by moving t he District Court to dismiss Harvin’s complaint

. 2 The Court referred the motion to a Magistrate Judge, and she
recommended its dismissal. The District Court followed her recommendation and
entered judgment for Chase. Harvin appeals , contending that the Court erred in considering documents attached to his complaint (which were referenced in the complaint’s allegations) , and abused its discretion in staying discovery pending the
resolution of Chase’s motion to dismiss and in denying his motion for recusal, which was based in part o n the Court’s dismissal of his complaint in Harv in v. Nationwide Title Clearing. Harvin’s contentions are patently meritless . The District Court’s judgment is accordingly
AFFIRMED.

2 We refer to Harvin’s amended complaint

.

Case: 16-15416 Date Filed: 08/25/2017 Page: 3 of 3
§ 2610.101 Definitions. ( a ) *Act* means the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504, as amended.
( b ) *Adjudicative officer* means the official, without regard to whether the official is designated as a hearing examiner, administrative law judge, administrative judge, or otherwise, who presided at the adversary adjudication.
( c ) *Adversary adjudication* means: ( 1 ) An adjudication under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the United States is represented by counsel or otherwise, but not including an adjudication for the purpose of establishing or fixing a rate or for the purpose of granting or renewing a license; and
( 2 ) An appeal of a decision of a contracting officer made pursuant to section 6 of the Contracts Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 605) as provided in section 8 of that statute (41 U.S.C. 607).
( d ) *Agency counsel* means: ( 1 ) When the position of the Office is being represented, the attorney or attorneys designated by the Office's General Counsel to represent the Office in a proceeding covered by this part; and
( 2 ) When the position of another agency of the United States is being represented, the representative or representatives as designated by that agency.
( e ) *Office* means the United States Office of Government Ethics, or the organizational unit within the Office responsible for conducting an adversary adjudication subject to this part.
( f ) *Proceeding* means an adversary adjudication as defined above.
( g ) *Director* means the Director of the United States Office of Government Ethics.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2019-1)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the first quarter 2019 Rail Cost 
Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The first quarter 2019 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.058. 
The first quarter 2019 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.448. The first quarter 2019 
RCAF-5 is 0.419.

DATES: Applicability Date: January 1, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800) 877-
8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our website at www.stb.gov. 
Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the Office of 
Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-
0238. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at 
(800) 877-8339.
    This action is categorically excluded from environmental review 
under 49 CFR 1105.6(c).

    By the Board, Board Members Begeman and Miller.

    Decided: December 17, 2018.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2018-27750 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P