alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 64056]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-24545]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission an application for license as a 
Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder--Ocean 
Transportation Intermediary pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984 as amended (46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 515).
    Persons knowing of any reason why the following applicants should 
not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Transportation Intermediaries, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, 
DC 20573.
    Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary Applicants:

Starlink Consolidation Service, Inc., 3780 W. Century Blvd., Inglewood, 
CA 90303. Officer: Michael Kuan, CEO/Secretary/CFO, Qualifying 
Individual).
First Choice International Travel and Cargo, 2357 S. Azusa Avenue, West 
Covina, CA 91792, Napoleon C. Mutuc, Sole Proprietor.
Global Alliance Logistics (NYC) Inc., One Cross Island Plaza, 133-33 
Brooklyn Ave., Suite <greek-i>209, Rosedale, NY 11422. Officers: Yuen 
W. Yeung, Secretary/Treasurer, (Qualifying Individual), Jacky Ip, 
President.
Convenient Freight System, Inc., 690 Knox Street, Suite 220, Torrance, 
CA 90502. Officers: Byoung Ho Son, Vice President, (Qualifying 
Individual), Bum Kyo Suh, President/CFO.
J.F. International Logistics, Inc., 5910 Pine Hill Road, Unit 
<greek-i>6, Port Richey, FL 34668. Officers: Joseph Ferrugia, 
President, (Qualifying Individual), Lori Ann Ferrugia, Secretary.
Sunway Express, Inc., 7902 Lemonwood Circle, La Palma, CA 90623. 
Officers: Qiling Wu, CEO, (Qualifying Individua), Yi Lu, Director.
Mateo Shipping, Corp., 1441 Ogden Avenue, Bronx, NY 10452. Officers: 
Julio Mateo, President, (Qualifying Individual), Julian Nunez, Vice 
President.

    Non-Vessel-Operating Common Carrier and Ocean Freight Forwarder 
Transportation Intermediary Applicants:

Star Freight Solutions, Inc., 21 Vermillion, Irving, CA 92603. Officer: 
Haiying Chen, CEO, (Qualifying Individual).
MLR Exports Inc. dba MLR Export Consolidations Inc., 11713 SW 91 
Terrace, Miami, FL 33186. Officers: Michelle Pedroso, Director, 
(Qualifying Individual), Rossy Rodriguez, Director.

    Dated: October 29, 2004.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-24545 Filed 11-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### §§ 1850.111-1850.119 [Reserved]
§ 2635.605 Waiver or authorization permitting participation while seeking employment. ( a ) *Waiver.* When, as defined in § 2635.603(b)(1)(i), an employee is engaged in employment negotiations for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 208(a), the employee may not participate personally and substantially in a particular matter that, to the employee's knowledge, has a direct and predictable effect on the financial interests of a prospective employer. The employee may participate in such matters only when the employee has received a written waiver issued under the authority of 18 U.S.C. 208(b)(1) or (3). These waivers are described in § 2635.402(d) and part 2640, subpart C, of this chapter. For certain employees, a regulatory exemption under the authority of 18 U.S.C. 208(b)(2) may also apply (see part 2640, subpart B, of this chapter, including § 2640.203(g) and (i)). *Example 1 to paragraph (a):* An employee of the Department of Agriculture is negotiating for employment within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. 208(a) and § 2635.603(b)(1)(i) with an orange grower. In the absence of a written waiver issued under 18 U.S.C. 208(b)(1), the employee may not take official action on a complaint filed by a competitor alleging that the grower has shipped oranges in violation of applicable quotas.
( b ) *Authorization by agency designee.* When an employee is seeking employment within the meaning of § 2635.603(b)(1)(ii) or (iii) and is not negotiating for employment, a reasonable person would be likely to question the employee's impartiality if the employee were to participate personally and substantially in a particular matter that, to the employee's knowledge, has a direct and predictable effect on the financial interests of any such prospective employer. The employee may participate in such matters only when the agency designee has authorized in writing the employee's participation in accordance with the standards set forth in § 2635.502(d). *Example 1 to paragraph (b):* Within the past month, an employee of the Department of Education mailed a resume to a university. The employee is thus seeking employment with the university within the meaning of § 2635.603(b)(1)(ii). In the absence of specific authorization by the agency designee in accordance with § 2635.502(d), the employee may not participate personally and substantially in an assignment to review a grant application submitted by the university.
§ 295.203 Filing requirements for demands or requests for documents or testimony. You must comply with the following requirements whenever you issue demands or requests to an OPM employee for official records and information or testimony. ( a ) Your request must be in writing and must be submitted to the General Counsel. If you serve a subpoena on OPM or an OPM employee before submitting a written request and receiving a final determination, OPM will oppose the subpoena on grounds that your request was not submitted in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) You written request must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved.
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document necessary to show relevance;
( 3 ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs the need to maintain any confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on OPM to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than an OPM employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, a general summary of the desired testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require with each OPM employee for time spent by the employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( c ) The Office of Personnel Management reserves the right to require additional information to complete your request where appropriate.
( d ) Your request should be submitted at least 45 days before the date that records or testimony is required. Requests submitted in less than 45 days before records or testimony is required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request and the reasons for expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the General Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with your request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            50,536
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           50,536
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             50,536
<EQUITIES>                                      20,220
<MORTGAGE>                                         624
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 113,752
<CASH>                                          31,578
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,286
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         106,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 926,383
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 94,566
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              2,011
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          683,773
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         4,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,087
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   926,383
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,955
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,282
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 166
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     323
<BENEFITS>                                       2,747
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,600
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,036)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,919)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Stre&t 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency 

Bldg No.2695, Window Rock Blvd 

Window Rock AZ 86515 

ATIN: ADMIN OFFICE 

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Navajo Nation EPA for public 

inspection 

To Whom It May Concern: 

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency 

retain the enclosed package at the library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. The 

package consists of documents related to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's 

final decision on the Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration amendment permit 

for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation 

near the city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. 

We would greatly appreciate your assistance for making these documents available to the general 

public. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9air:permits@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

:?� 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Environmental Engineer 

Permits Office, Air Division
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                       AMENDMENT TO 1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN


         On October 16, 2002, the Stockholders of the Company approved the
following amendment to the 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "1997 Plan"):

         Section 5(b) of the 1997 Plan is hereby amended by increasing the
maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued in excess of those made
available under the Corporation's 1994 Stock Option Plan to 2,000,000 shares,
and by increasing the aggregate number of shares that may be covered by options
awarded to any Optionee to 50,000 shares per calendar year. Section 5(b) shall
read as follows effective upon approval by the Corporation's stockholders:

                  "(b) MAXIMUM SHARES. The aggregate number of shares that may
         be issued under Options pursuant to the Plan shall not exceed 2,000,000
         shares plus (i) shares, if any, reserved for issuance under the 1994
         Plan in excess of the number of shares as to which options have been
         granted thereunder, and (ii) any shares as to which options may have
         terminated due to expiration, cancellation, forfeiture, or otherwise
         without the issuance of such shares under the 1994 Plan. The aggregate
         number of shares with respect to which Options may be granted pursuant
         to the Plan to any Optionee shall not exceed 50,000 shares per calendar
         year. The limitations established in Section 5 of the Plan shall be
         subject to adjustment as provided in Section 9 of the Plan."

         Terms used in the Amendment and not defined herein are used herein as
they are defined in the 1997 Plan. References in the 1997 Plan to "this 1997
Plan" (and indirect references such as "hereof" and "herein") are amended to
refer to the 1997 Plan as amended by this Amendment.
I^ ^ ^1^3_^* !^	

' ,_; t E' s ;	w 'f i 11 

:1tr>7ttst E>. 20 13 

'Fhc 1 Ionarabli; C;inrt 1dcC'My 

:lclrrl i n i strtttor 

t ' .5. FIrlvlrC?nlllttltal la rt)tCc'tli)tl A^,t~11Cy 

1200 PCntlSyIVttttia;AlVCnttC.'ti.li'. 

W,rsliing, tarr. 1)C.' 20460 

I )eair Admini:;Urrrtcar McC'Grr'thy: 

Wt «curt ta jcAn c7rrr c.crlleatWrcs on thc 5errtttc C'rrt7trraittee orz Sr17,r1) I3tasirttrSS' iir 

askirr g tltc 1°:1 1 .A to re-GE°alutttc tlrc cr7st, (Mn smUll busirlcSsts at'tllc prcrlxrsecl reVisic>rt5 h) 

thG rrrlcicr g rotincl stcrrttgc: t.rnl: (U c;T) rrgulaticros. latrhlishccl in the Fecleral Itcgistcr cm 

Nover7lher 18. 2011. 

\t'hile l;PA e5tirxiatccl ttre ,utnrrdi;red cost OCthc rcrlc. car7 srnall htrsitlessCs tc3 he 

S4t){) per leGrr, sm:rll buirres:; irieiu::trv ev.pert5 e5tin3atc the c:c7sts ttt S6.900 Iicr year. "I lrc 

lnr gr clispEtrity iri cost estim:rtr:s tivctrr{tms cr tluuougtt rctiln4 of ` flre cc>mpliance cost 

crnalysis. Wit11 95 paccrrt c}I`tht iniljactccl firnns bi;ing srrtcrl) bttsirrc;sses.. it is criticul tlrat 

tlte cost artt3lysis hroperlr` 1-c1TCct tlIc.^ liill cOst Ot'tl'te rulc. Irt t't'-cVtrlutztitl," the ccast5 Ol' tlic 

rulc. we ask tlrat ynu rcrich cmt tci the smrrll knrsinc;sses inili4tcteci by t1w rule to boter 

rittcltrstanil ho\\, tlae rttic wortJt) imhru:t tliern linancirrlly. 

\^'c look ('01'Warcl ta your prc)mlat rcho^ `Hhrtnk yc>u firr yorir ccrtrsicic=rmion. 

 Sinc^rcl^^. 

.^

44 ^iil i

lKay R. ^^la^ ^rll ^-01^ 

cc; !)r% i\ irislow 1.;argearrt. ('hiel'(.'r,crnscl. Cc5. Slrrcrll 13uNirress Wirrtirtisu'ation. 017icc tit 

:1dvcrcacv 

Ile I-hncarErWe l,.rrrclr'iCu. 01air. l'.S. ScnEite C'011111ritiGe On S111all 13usirn:ss 

1 hc 11onur,rl31e Jmncs 1:. lZisch. R.rrnhing h^lerrthm. tt.S. Senatc ('omn7itts:i orl Srnrall 

(3usincs4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-4401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH CHRISTOPHER JACOBS, a/k/a TC,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:14-cr-00177-F-1)

Submitted: January 26, 2016 Decided: February 5, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, 

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, Jennifer 

P. May-Parker, Yvonne V. Watford-McKinney, Assistant United 

States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Christopher Jacobs pled guilty to possession with 

the intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine, in violation of 

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2012). The district court, discussing 

the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) factors, imposed a withinGuidelines term of imprisonment of 168 months and an upward 

variant term of supervised release of 10 years. On appeal, 

Jacobs contends that his 10-year term of supervised release is 

substantively unreasonable.

Because Jacobs did not object to the imposed term of 

supervised release in the district court, we review only for 

plain error. Webb, 738 F.3d at 640-41. Under the plain error 

standard, Jacobs must show (1) an error; (2) that is plain; 

(3) that affects substantial rights; and (4) that seriously 

affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial 

proceedings. Id. “An error is plain when it is obvious or 

clear under current law.” United States v. Chong Lam, 677 F.3d 

190, 201 (4th Cir. 2012).

A district court, “in determining . . . the length of the 

term and the conditions of supervised release, shall consider 

the factors set forth in section 3553(a)(1), (a)(2)(B), 

(a)(2)(C), (a)(2)(D), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6), and (a)(7).” 18 

U.S.C. § 3583(c) (2012). Having reviewed the record, we do not 
3

find it obvious or clear that the district court’s imposition of 

a 10-year term of supervised release was substantively 

unreasonable given Jacobs’ extensive criminal record and his 

repeated violations of terms of probation and supervised 

release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(B) (2012) (identifying

“adequate deterrence to criminal conduct” as factor for 

determining proper sentence); cf. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines 

Manual § 4A1.3 cmt. background (2014) (identifying greater risk 

of recidivism where defendant’s criminal record contains pattern 

of offenses and repeated lenient sentences). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned herebycertifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC(the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

 

(a)                     the AnnualReport of the Fund on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)                    theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for suchperiod.

 

 

Date: February 29,2008

 

 
|   | /s/ Andrew C. Frenette                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Andrew C. Frenette   Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fundand will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the
Annual Report of Yanzhou Coal Mining Company Limited, a joint stock limited company incorporated in the Peoples Republic of China with limited liability (the Company), on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, YANG Deyu, General Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that to the best of my knowledge:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |               |  |                
|------------------- |  | ------------- |  | ---------------
|Date: June 29, 2007 |  | /s/ YANG Deyu
|                    |  | Name:         |  | YANG Deyu      
|                    |  | Title:        |  | General Manager

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 212.10 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the adversary adjudication for which an award is sought. The application shall show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of the Commission investigative attorney that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall also state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
( b ) The application shall also include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $1 million (if an individual) or $5 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates). However, an applicant may omit this statement if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualifies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Commission to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
### §32. Findings by jury; costs

If, in any action brought pursuant to section 30 of this title, title to the ground in controversy shall not be established by either party, the jury shall so find, and judgment shall be entered according to the verdict. In such case costs shall not be allowed to either party, and the claimant shall not proceed in the land office or be entitled to a patent for the ground in controversy until he shall have perfected his title.

(Mar. 3, 1881, ch. 140, 21 Stat. 505.)