alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 293.505 Establishment and protection of Employee Medical Folder. ( a ) As required by these rules, agencies must establish an EMF when the employee leaves the employing agency and occupational medical records for that employee exist; agencies may also establish an EMF (if none presently exists) for active employees if the agency chooses. An agency must request the transfer of an existing EMF (and maintain that EMF as received) at the same time it requests the transfer of an employee's OPF using the procedures contained in § 293.306.
( b ) Neither the original occupational medical record nor duplicates are to be retained in the OPF. Prior to the establishment of an EMF for a separating employee, when such records are created, they must be maintained physically apart from the OPF, although they may be kept in the same office.
( c ) Records in an EMF, whether or not located in an office other than where the OPF is maintained, must be properly safeguarded using procedures ensuring equal or greater levels of protection as those in § 293.106. Disclosures must be made only to those authorized to receive them, as described in § 293.504(b), and employees must be able to ascertain from agency implementing instructions the location of all of their medical records. An EMF must be under the control of a specifically designated medical, health, safety, or personnel officer as prescribed in the agency's implementing internal procedures.
#### §§ 2423.43-2423.49 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a
listing of the subsidiaries of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation*:



|                                           |  |                             
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Subsidiary                                 |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|                                           | 
|Belvedere Trust Mortgage Corporation       |  | Maryland                    
|                                           | 
|BT Management Holding Corporation          |  | Delaware                    
|                                           | 
|BT Management Company, L.L.C.              |  | Delaware                    
|                                           | 
|Belvedere Trust Finance Corporation        |  | Delaware                    
|                                           | 
|BT Residential Funding Corporation         |  | Delaware                    
|                                           | 
|Belvedere Trust Secured Assets Corporation |  | Delaware                    
|                                           | 
|BellaVista Finance Corporation             |  | Delaware                    
|                                           | 
|BellaVista Funding Corporation             |  | Delaware                    



|* | The assets of each of the foregoing subsidiaries have been assigned to a third party for the benefit of creditors.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### §1142. Establishment of program

The Secretary of Commerce, acting through the National Sea Grant Office, shall establish a program to provide training, education, outreach, and technical assistance initiatives for young fishermen, to be known as the 'Young Fishermen's Development Grant Program' (referred to in this section 1 as the 'Program').

(Pub. L. 116–289, §3, Jan. 5, 2021, 134 Stat. 4886.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Young Fishermen's Development Act, and not as part of titles I and II of Pub. L. 89–454 which comprise this chapter.

1 So in original. Probably should refer to this subchapter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7285

CHRISTOPHER ROSS LEFEVER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District 

Judge. (7:14-cv-00600-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 20, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Ross LeFever, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph W. H. Mott, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Ross LeFever, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. LeFever v. United States, No. 7:14-cv00600-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. June 19, 2015). We deny LeFever’s 

motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William T. Bromage, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation.     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures; andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operations ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 28, 2006   By: /s/ William T. Bromage     William T. Bromage
§ 1620.43 Agency payments to TSP record keeper; agency ultimately responsible. ( a ) *Agency making payments to TSP record keeper.* The current employing agency is responsible for making payments to the TSP record keeper for all contributions, regardless of whether some of that expense is ultimately chargeable to a prior employing agency.
( b ) *Agency ultimately chargeable with expense.* The agency that reemployed the participant is ordinarily the agency ultimately chargeable with the expense of agency contributions and the breakage attributable to them. However, if an employee changed agencies during the period between the date of reemployment and October 13, 1994, the employing agency as of October 13, 1994, is the agency ultimately chargeable with the expense.
( c ) *Reimbursement by agency ultimately chargeable with expense.* If the agency that made the payments to the TSP record keeper for agency contributions is not the agency ultimately chargeable for that expense, the agency that made the payments to the TSP record keeper may, but is not required to, obtain reimbursement from the agency ultimately chargeable with the expense.
[70 FR 32213, June 1, 2005; as amended at 87 FR 31679, May 24, 2022]
### §7304. Availability of records

To evaluate and review the use of block grant amounts, consolidated assistance, and other grant programs established or provided for in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Public Law 97–35, 95 Stat. 357), records related to the amounts, assistance, or programs that are in the possession, custody, or control of a State, a political subdivision of a State, or a grantee of a State or political subdivision of a State shall be made available to the Comptroller General.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1040.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7304 | 31:1243(note). | Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, §1744, 95 Stat. 764. |

The words "records . . . shall be made available to" are substituted for "shall have access to any books, accounts, records, correspondence, or other documents" for consistency in the revised title and with other titles of the United States Code.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 357. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7826

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BRANDON FOSTER, a/k/a Beezie , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News

. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00112

- RGD

- FBS

- 4 )

Submitted : April 10, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020

Before AGEE, WYNN, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Brandon Foster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Brandon Foster appeals the district court’s order s denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194, and denying reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order s . See United States v. Foster , No. 4:07

- cr - 00112

- RGD

- FBS

- 4 (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2019; Sept. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §§1801, 1802. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–662, title XIV, §1405(b), Nov. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 4271

Section 1801, Pub. L. 95–502, title II, §203, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1697, established Inland Waterways Trust Fund. See section 9506 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Section 1802, Pub. L. 95–502, title II, §204, Oct. 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 1698, made Inland Waterways Trust Fund available for expenditures for navigation construction and rehabilitation projects on inland waterways. See section 9506 of Title 26.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1987, see section 1405(d)(1) of Pub. L. 99–662, set out as an Effective Date note under section 9506 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
### §3009. Use of recruiting materials for public relations

The Secretary may use for public relations purposes of the Department of Commerce any advertising materials developed for use for recruitment and retention of personnel for the commissioned officer corps of the Administration. Any such use shall be under such conditions and subject to such restrictions as the Secretary shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §219, as added Pub. L. 116–259, title I, §106(a), Dec. 23, 2020, 134 Stat. 1159.)
Exhibits 13.1.  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Christopher Mattheisen,
certify that the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 21, 2009By:
  /s/ Christopher
  MattheisenName:
  Christopher MattheisenTitle:
  Chairman and Chief
  Executive Officer
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

Washington, DC 20555-001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 00-184 December 18, 2000

DATE CHANGES FOR NRC’S 13TH ANNUAL

REGULATORY INFORMATION CONFERENCE

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s 13th annual Regulatory Information Conference will

begin on March 13 -- not March 12 -- as previously announced -- and end the morning of March 15.

The conference, to be held at the Capital Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C., will begin at 1:00

p.m. on March 13, and end about noon March 15.

For additional information or questions, contact Sharon Bell at (301) 415-1217 or via e-mail:

sab1@nrc.gov

###
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of GeoGlobal Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jean Paul Roy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

















/s/ Jean Paul Roy


------------------------


Jean Paul Roy


President and Chief Executive Officer


May 14, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1







CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)



I, Jean Paul Roy, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GeoGlobal Resources Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small  business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 10, 2005

/s/ Jean Paul Roy

------------------------

Jean Paul Roy

President and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENRIQUE PUENTES-IBARRA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70437

Agency No. A024-341-618

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 15, 2013** 

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Enrique Puentes-Ibarra, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of an order of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”)

reinstating his prior order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

OCT 25 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We lack jurisdiction to review DHS’s reinstatement order because PuentesIbarra filed his Petition for Review beyond the statutory 30-day filing deadline. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30

days after the date of the final order of removal.”); see also Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d

1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[T]he ‘[t]ime for filing a review petition begins to run

when the [agency] complies with the terms of federal regulations [governing

service of the agency’s decision].’” (citation omitted)). Puentes-Ibarra’s opening

brief does not contain any assertion of nonreceipt of the reinstatement order. See

Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[W]e generally will not

take up arguments not raised in an alien’s opening brief before this court.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 12-70437
#### § 2606.101 Purpose.

This part sets forth the regulations of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) implementing the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a). It governs access, maintenance, disclosure, and amendment of records contained in OGE's executive branch Governmentwide and internal systems of records, and establishes rules of conduct for OGE employees who have responsibilities under the Act.
### §2202. Designation and naming within the Capitol Visitor Center

#### (a) In general

Except as provided under subsection (b), no part of the Capitol Visitor Center may be designated or named without the approval of—

(1) not less than 3⁄4 of all members on the Capitol Preservation Commission who are members of the Democratic party; and

(2) not less than 3⁄4 of all members on the Capitol Preservation Commission who are members of the Republican party.

#### (b) Exception

Subsection (a) shall not apply to any room or space under the jurisdiction of the Senate or the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 110–437, title I, §102, Oct. 20, 2008, 122 Stat. 4986.)
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# SECY-05-0089 - Annual Report on Activities Associated with Evaluating Scientific Information and Radiation Protection Recommendations

Accession Number: ML051220485

Date Released: Thursday, June 2, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML050970417 - SECY-05-0089 - Annual Report on Activities Associated with Evaluating Scientific Information and Radiation Protection Recommendations (10 page(s), 5/16/2005)
    - ML050970451 - SECY-05-0089-Attachment - Activities Associated with Evaluating Scientific Info and Radiation Protection Recommendations (10 page(s), 5/16/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1572 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1572

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox 
 Street in Pensacola, Florida, as the ``Winston E. Arnow United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 100 North Palafox Street in 
Pensacola, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Winston E. 
Arnow United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Winston E. 
Arnow United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```