alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§251 to 262. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(b), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section 251, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 645; May 17, 1928, ch. 600, 45 Stat. 592, related to time for lights and exclusivity of prescribed lights, and defined "visible".

Section 252, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 645; May 17, 1928, ch. 600, 45 Stat. 592; Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 370, 45 Stat. 1405; May 9, 1932, ch. 175, §1, 47 Stat. 152; Mar. 18, 1948, ch. 138, §§1–3, 62 Stat. 82, related to lights of steam vessels under way.

Section 253, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 646, related to lights of steam vessels having a tow other than a raft.

Section 254, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 646, related to lights of steam vessels having a raft in tow.

Section 255, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 646, related to lights of sailing vessels under way and vessels in tow.

Section 256, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 646; May 17, 1928, ch. 601, §1, 45 Stat. 593; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, related to lights of small tugs, boats on River St. Lawrence, ferryboats, rafts and canal boats.

Section 257, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 646, related to lights of small vessels under way in bad weather.

Section 258, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 647; May 17, 1928, ch. 600, 45 Stat. 592; Apr. 22, 1940, ch. 128, §2, 54 Stat. 150; Jan. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 97–449, §2(d)(1), 96 Stat. 2440, related to lights of vessels at anchor.

Section 259, acts Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 647; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, related to lights of produce boats, canal boats, etc., navigating by hand or horsepower or by sail or by current, or at anchor.

Section 260, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 647, related to lights of open boats.

Section 261, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 647, related to use of torch by sailing vessels on approach of steamer.

Section 262, act Feb. 8, 1895, ch. 64, §1, 28 Stat. 647, related to suspension of lights by vessels of war or Coast Guard vessels.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Mar. 1, 1983, pursuant to 47 F.R. 15135, Apr. 8, 1982, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.47

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

         This Termination Agreement (this "Agreement") is signed in 27 November,
2003 between the following two parties.

PARTY A:          LINKTONE LTD.
ADDRESS:          Cayman Islands, British West Indies

PARTY B:          Hu Ankai
ADDRESS:          No.22, Lane 1416, Zhonghua Road, Shanghai

         1.WHEREAS, Party A and Party B signed the equity pledge agreement (the
"Equity Pledge Agreement") in January 16th, 2002.

         2.WHEREAS, Party A and Party B intent to terminate the Equity Pledge
Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, both parties agree as follows:

1.       Party A and Party B agree to terminate the Equity Pledge Agreement and
         the Equity Pledge Agreement shall terminate automatically upon this
         Agreement coming into effect.

2.       Rights and obligations of Party A and Party B under the Equity Pledge
         Agreement shall terminate upon the termination of the Equity Pledge
         Agreement.

3.       This Agreement shall be effective as of the date of execution.

4.       This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of People's Republic of
         China.

5.       This Agreement is executed in Chinese and English in duplicate, and in
         case of conflicts, the Chinese version shall prevail.

PARTY A: LINKTONE LTD.

Representative: /s/ Jun Wu

PARTY B: /s/ Hu Ankai

                                       1
### §7108. Limitation on authority under sections 7105–7107

Under regulations prescribed by the President, the head of an executive agency may act under sections 7105–7107 of this title for a project assisted under at least 2 assistance programs. The regulations shall ensure that the head of an executive agency acts under those sections only—

(1) when a problem cannot be adequately solved through other action under this chapter or other law;

(2) when necessary to promote expeditious processing of applications or effective and efficient administration of the project; and

(3) in a way consistent with protecting the interest of the United States Government and with the program purposes and requirements of law.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1039.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7108 | 42:4254. | Dec. 5, 1974, Pub. L. 93–510, §5, 88 Stat. 1605. |

In the section, the words "act under" are substituted for "use the authorities described in", and the words "when necessary" are substituted for "that they are applied only as necessary", to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "head of an executive agency acts under those sections only" are substituted for "the authorities are limited in use to" for clarity. The words "These authorities shall be exercised only", "Where appropriate to further the purposes of this chapter, and subject to the conditions prescribed in this section", "(relating to the establishment of uniform technical or administrative requirements, delegation of powers and responsibilities, and establishment of joint management funds)", "include criteria or procedures to", and "that they are applied", are omitted as unnecessary because of the restatement.
Exhibit 99.0

                                         Certification Required
                            by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Lan Chile S.A. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 30, 2003                       /s/ Enrique Cueto Plaza
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Enrique Cueto Plaza
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated: June 30, 2003                       /s/ Alejandro de Fuente Goic
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Lan Chile S.A. and will be retained by Lan Chile S.A. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1205.22 Action on request. ( a ) *Amendment granted.* If the Board grants the request for amendment, it will notify the requester and provide him or her with a copy of the amendment.
( b ) *Amendment denied.* If the Board denies the request for amendment in whole or in part, it will provide the requester with a written notice that includes the following information: ( 1 ) The basis for the denial; and
( 2 ) The procedures for appealing the denial.
# Search.com

new colors: ♦♦♦♦♦

DownloadsShoppingGamesMore

**what's new**advancedhelpresearch by topichide search history

top searchessettingsdownload toolbarhelp

CNET.comCNET Download.comCNET News.comCNET ReviewsCNET Shopper.comGameSpotMP3.commySimonSearch.comTechRepublicWebshotsZDNetInternational Sites

About CNET NetworksCopyrightPrivacy PolicyTerms of Use
**EXHIBIT 6****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Royal Group Technologies Limited (the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to itsannual report on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”),with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.     I, Lawrence Blanford, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated:August 28, 2006          /s/  LawrenceJ. Blanford    Lawrence J. Blanford    President and Chief Executive Officer   
 

 
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Royal Group Technologies Limited (the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 to itsannual report on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”),with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.     I, James G. Lawn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated:August 28, 2006          /s/  James G. Lawn    James G. Lawn    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OFINCORPORATION**

**OF**

**MOTHERS WORK, INC.**

 

(Pursuant to 8 Del.C. §242)

 

Mothers Work,Inc., (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and byvirtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (“DGCL”), doeshereby certify that:

 

**FIRST**:  The Board of Directors of the Corporation,at the meeting of the Board of Directors held on November 13, 2002, dulyadopted a resolution declaring advisable the amendment of the Amended andRestated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and submitting suchamendment to the stockholders of the Corporation for approval at the nextannual meeting of stockholders.  The resolutionsetting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

 

RESOLVED, that the Amended and RestatedCertificate of Incorporation of the Corporation be amended by deleting ARTICLEFOURTH thereof and substituting therefor the following:

 

FOURTH:              The total number of shares of allclasses of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is20,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “CommonStock”), and 2,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share (the“Preferred Stock”).

 

The Board of Directors of the Corporationshall have full and complete authority, by resolution from time to time, toestablish one or more series and to issue shares of Preferred Stock and to fix,determine and vary the voting rights, designations, preferences,qualifications, privileges, limitations, options, conversion rights and otherspecial rights of each series of Preferred Stock, including but not limited to,dividend rates and manner of payment, preferential amounts payable uponvoluntary or involuntary liquidation, voting rights, conversion rights,redemption prices, terms and conditions and sinking fund and stock purchaseprices.

** **

**SECOND**:  A majority of the outstanding stock entitledto vote thereon voted in favor of the amendment at the annual meeting ofstockholders.

 

**THIRD**:  The amendment was duly adopted in accordancewith the provisions of §242 of the DGCL.

 

----

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,Mothers Work, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed by Rebecca C.Matthias, its President, this 11th day of February, 2003.

 
|        |                 | **MOTHERS WORK, INC.** |
|-------------|----------------------|------------------------|
|        |                 |
|        |                 | By:                    | /s/ Rebecca  C. Matthias |   |
|        |                 |                   | Rebecca C.  Matthias |
|        |                 |                   | President |
| **Attest:** |                 |                   |   |
| By:         | /s/ Dan W.  Matthias |                   |   |   |   |
|        | Dan W.  Matthias     |                   |   |   |
|        | Secretary            |                   |   |   |
|             |                      |                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

2

----
June 30, 2011 

Mr. Chuck King 

Director of Maintenance 

Surdex Geospatial Systems Integration, LLC 

203 Airport Drive, Hangar 6 

Westminster, MD 21157 

Dear Mr. King: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 125.226(b)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t 

process your request and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your May 10, 2011, exemption request for Surdex Geospatial Systems 

Integration, LLC (Surdex), into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0534), but we are unable to 

process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the 

requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us the following: 

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without telling you further. 

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-3327 

Sincerely, 

/s/ James M. Crotty for 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division 

Enclosure
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-019 April 14, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC TO DISCUSS 2004 PERFORMANCE AT HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff is scheduled to meet with Progress Energy officials

April 21 to discuss the NRC’s annual assessment of safety performance at the Harris nuclear power

plant, located southwest of Raleigh. The period covered is the calendar year 2004.

The 1:00 p.m. meeting at the Holiday Inn Express in Apex is open to public observation. 

Before the meeting ends, NRC staff will be available to answer public questions on the plant’s safety

performance, as well as the agency’s role in ensuring safe operation of the facility.

“Each year the NRC staff rates the performance of the Harris plant and all of the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power plants,” NRC Region II Administrator William Travers said. “This meeting

gives us a chance to discuss our assessment with the company, with local officials and with residents

near the plant. Our aim is to make this information available to the public and answer any questions

people may have about our oversight.”

Overall, the Harris plant operated safely during 2004. The NRC uses color-coded inspection

findings and performance indicators to assess performance. The colors start with “green” and increase

to “white,” “yellow” or “red,” commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

For the final three quarters in 2004, the Harris plant had nothing classified beyond “green.”

However, during the first quarter of the period, a “white” performance indicator for unplanned

shutdowns was in effect from the previous period.. Based on an NRC inspection finding corrective

actions for that issue were adequate and performance since then, Harris will receive the baseline, or

normal, level of inspections during 2005. The NRC also continues to review a previously unresolved

item involving cable wrap fire barrier qualification tests and the way the material is installed.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2004q4.pdf .

Routine inspections are performed by NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and by

specialists from the Region II Office in Atlanta, and the agency’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. 

Current information for the Harris plant is available on the NRC web site at:

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html .

###
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1346 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1346

  To amend the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act to provide an 
additional function of the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy 
   relating to encouraging Federal procurement policies that enhance 
                           energy efficiency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2003

Mr. Turner of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act to provide an 
additional function of the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy 
   relating to encouraging Federal procurement policies that enhance 
                           energy efficiency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROCUREMENT POLICY ACT.

    Section 6 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 
U.S.C. 405) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (12);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (13) and 
        inserting ``and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(14) encouraging Federal procurement policies that 
        enhance the energy efficiency of the Federal Government and 
        decrease the Government's dependency on non-renewable energy 
        resources.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:22 AM

To: 'brp@starfleetaudio.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion: Bradley Pierce (FAA-2015-1463)



### July 29, 2015

Dear Mr. Pierce:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is mi ssing from your petition (Docket No.

FAA

− 2015

− 1463). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material listed belo w, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by August 12, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (**“the Company”**), herby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the**“Report”**) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: April 30, 2013 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of LATAM Airlines Group S.A. (the **“Company”**), herby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the **“Report”**) of the Companyfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Dated: April 30, 2013 

 

/s/ Alejandro de la Fuente Goic
Alejandro de la Fuente GoicCFO LATAM