alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements  of  Tag-It  Pacific,   Inc.  on  Form  S-8  (File  Nos.  333-134619,
333-119712,  333-109854,  333-98577, 333-66356, 333-44592, 333-84099, 333-50267)
and Form S-3 (File Nos.  333-121095,  333-106494  and  333-111612) of our report
dated  April  9,  2006  relating  to our  audit  of the  consolidated  financial
statements,  and the financial  statement  schedule,  which appear in the Annual
Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Tag-It Pacific, Inc. for each of the two years ended December 31, 2006.


                                   /s/ Singer Lewak Greenbaum and Goldstein, LLP
                                   ---------------------------------------------

Los Angeles, California
April 11, 2007
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 33 5 . J OE NEI L GLENN, J R. v

. THE STATE.

In 2 0 1 3

, a ju ry co n v i ct ed J o e Nei l Gl en n , J r. of t wo co u n ts o f ch il d m o l es t at i o n.

T h i s Co u rt s ub s eq u en t l y affi rm ed h i s co n v ict i on s i n an u n pu b l i s h ed o p i ni o n

. S e e

Cas e No

. A1 6 A 0 10 9 (J u ly 1 3

, 2 0 16 ). In 2 0 2 1

, G l en n fi l ed a p r o s e ex t rao rd i n ary

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al

, wh i ch t h e t ri a l c o u r t d e n i ed o n J an uary 2 0, 2 0 2 2

, an d Gl en n

fi led th i s ap p eal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. As an in i t i al m at t er, OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (a) (7 ) req u i res a d is cret i o n ary ap p l i cat i o n

t o ap p eal fro m t h e d en i al o f an ex t r a o r d i nary m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al

. Gl en n act u al l y

fi led an ap p l i cat i o n f

o r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew i n t h i s Co u rt

, b u t i t was d i s m i s s ed

b ecau s e h i s ap p l i cat i o n was u n t i m el y . See Cas e No . A2 2 D0 3 2 5 (Ap r. 1 8 , 2 0 2 2 ).

Bu t ev en i f Gl en n was en t i t led t o a d i rect ap p eal fro m t h e d en i al o f h i s

ex t rao rd i n ary m ot i o n fo r n ew t ri al

, h i s d i r e ct ap p eal i s al s o u n t i m el y

. A n o t i ce o f

ap p eal m u st b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e en t ry o f an ap p eal ab l e ju d g m en t. OCGA

§ 5-6 -3 8 (a). T h e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p e a l i s a n ab s o l u t e May 11, 2022req u i rem en t t o co n fer ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o n t h i s Co urt

. Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4 Ga.

8 7 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 75 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Gl en n ’ s no t i ce o f ap p eal was fi l ed o n Feb ru ary

2 4 , 2 0 2 2 , 3 5 d ay s aft er en try o f t h e o rd er s o ug h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. Fo r t h es e reas o ns , w e l ack ju ri s d i ct io n ov er t h i s ap p eal

, w h i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/11/2022
### **CHAPTER 35—ARTIFICIAL REEFS**

Sec.
2101.
Congressional statement of findings and purpose.
2102.
Establishment of standards.
2103.
National artificial reef plan.
2104.
Permits for construction and management of artificial reefs.
2105.
Definitions.
2106.
Savings clauses.
!


 "# !


  !

 	


		


	  
	


	





   




	 


   

   




	 !

"




	

#$%&

"

	



	

'()%*

	


	

%+)'*



*















,#$( ) %'**

% '(*%-($.

/0121344

 
	








! 
!-)'%

 %&($.

' #


 





%%#$( 
(

%%#$( "#! 

%%#$(



$5 20 

$5 6 

$5 72 

$5 2 

$5
#### § 190.25 Destruction under CBP supervision.

A claimant may destroy merchandise and obtain drawback by complying with the procedures set forth in § 190.71 relating to destruction.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of CFO**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United StatesCode), the undersigned officer of Gateway, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Gateway”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Gateway fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gateway. 

Dated: May 10, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Form 10-Q pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Gateway, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
### §4216. Report requirements; petition of Attorney General for equitable relief

#### (a) Report

The Foundation shall, as soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal year, transmit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources, the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report—

(1) describing the proceedings and activities of the Foundation during that fiscal year, including a full and complete statement of its receipts, expenditures, and investments; and

(2) including a detailed statement of the recipient, amount, and purpose of each grant made by the Foundation in the fiscal year.

#### (b) Relief with respect to certain Foundation acts or failure to act

If the Foundation—

(1) engages in, or threatens to engage in, any act, practice, or policy that is inconsistent with its purposes set forth in section 4211(b) of this title; or

(2) refuses, fails, or neglects to discharge its obligations under this subchapter, or threatens to do so,

the Attorney General may petition in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for such equitable relief as may be necessary or appropriate.

(Pub. L. 116–224, title I, §116, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1079.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), was in the original "this title", meaning title I of Pub. L. 116–224, Dec. 18, 2020, 134 Stat. 1074, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
#### Guissippe Craprizzio, Respondent, *v.*Central New England Railway Company, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the ISth day of January, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered on the same day denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

We think the finding of the jury that the defendant was negligent and that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence was against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., concurred in the reversal upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to justify the finding of the jury that the defendant was guilty of negligence. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Environmental Effects on Fatigue Crack Initiation in Piping and Pressure Vessel Steels (NUREG/CR-6717, ANL-00/27)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6717 (PDF - 1.31 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**October 2000**Date Published:**May 2001

**Prepared by:** O.K. Chopra, W.J. Shack

 Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Avenue Argonne, Illinois 60439

J. Muscara, NRC Task Manager

**Prepared for:**Division of Engineering Technology Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code W6610

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides rules for the construction of nuclear power plant components. Appendix I to Section III of the Code specifies fatigue design curves for structural materials. However, the effects of light water reactor (LWR) coolant environments are not explicitly addressed by the Code design curves. Test data illustrate potentially significant effects of LWR environments on the fatigue resistance of carbon and low-alloy steels and austenitic stainless steels. This report summarizes the work performed at Argonne National Laboratory on the fatigue of piping and pressure vessel steels in LWR coolant environments. The existing fatigue S-N data have been evaluated to establish the effects of various material and loading variables, such as steel type, strain range, strain rate, temperature, and dissolved-oxygen level in water, on the fatigue lives of these steels. Statistical models are presented for estimating the fatigue S-N curves for carbon and low-alloy steels and austenitic stainless steels as a function of material, loading, and environmental variables. The influence of reactor environments on the mechanism of fatigue crack initiation are discussed. Decreased fatigue lives of carbon and low-alloy steels and austenitic stainless steels in water are caused primarily by the effects of environment on the growth of short cracks. The results suggest that for carbon and low-alloy steels, the growth of these small cracks in high-purity oxygenated water occurs by a slip oxidation/dissolution process. A fracture mechanics approach has been used to evaluate the effects of environment on fatigue crack initiation in carbon and low-alloy steels. Environmentally assisted reduction in fatigue life of austenitic stainless steels is most likely caused by other mechanisms such as hydrogen-enhanced crack growth. Two methods for incorporating environmental effects into the ASME Code fatigue evaluations are discussed. Differences between the methods and their impact on the design fatigue curves are also discussed.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-150 December 1, 2004 

NRC LICENSES SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGE FACILITY

AT IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a license to the Foster Wheeler Environmental

Corp. to construct and operate an independent spent nuclear fuel storage installation at the Idaho

National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL).

The facility will receive, repackage and store spent fuel originally from the Shippingport

Atomic Power Station, a decommissioned light-water breeder reactor; the Peach Bottom Unit 1 reactor,

a decommissioned high-temperature gas-cooled reactor; and various training and research reactors built

by General Atomics (TRIGA reactors). Most of this fuel is currently stored at INEEL in above-ground

spent fuel pools or dry underground storage facilities. The new facility will store the spent fuel in

sealed stainless steel canisters placed inside steel tubes within a concrete storage vault.

The Foster Wheeler facility, to be called the Idaho Spent Fuel Facility, will be located adjacent

to existing Department of Energy spent fuel storage installations at INEEL, including the NRClicensed facility storing fuel debris from Three Mile Island Unit 2. It will include a transfer area for

repackaging the spent fuel into the new canisters.

“The issuance of this license culminates a detailed three-year review by NRC staff with our

determination that the applicant’s plans provide adequate protection for public health and safety,

security and the environment,” said E. William Brach, director of the NRC’s Spent Fuel Project Office.

“We will continue our focus on safety as we inspect the facility during its construction and operation.”

The NRC issued a notice of opportunity to request a hearing on this application in June 2002,

but no requests for a hearing were received. The agency received more than 90 written comments on a

draft environmental impact statement; these were addressed in the final environmental impact

statement, issued in January 2004.

The license is valid for 20 years and may be renewed if NRC staff determines that its continued

operation provides adequate protection for the public health and safety.

The Shippingport Atomic Power Station was the first commercial nuclear power plant in the

United States. Co-owned by the Atomic Energy Commission and Duquesne Light Company, it

operated from 1958 until 1974. Peach Bottom Unit 1 was an experimental 40-megawatt reactor that
2

provided performance data to the nuclear industry during its operation from 1967 to 1974. The General

Atomics TRIGA reactors are a widely used type of research reactor.

###
Reflector Lamp Show Tell

RLarn

• Original Blown Bulb - outlawed by EPACT except those for rough and vibration service,

colored lamps, etc.

® Universal application

BR Lamps

® Exempted by EPACT

BR = Bulged Reflector - secondar; reflector in necklreflector transition area

® Reduces light trapped in the neck of an R lamp

® More forward light. Less spill light. Greater efficacy

® Efficacy not dependent on neck length

Origin goes back to 1937 (Corning Glass)

® Long neck types produced first

® Shorter necks when fixtures had adjustable sockets

Universal application

References in appendix of ANSI C79.1 1980. Standard was reaffirmed in 1984 and

1989, and revised in 1994. New line drawings of several types including BR were

added to the main body of the standard.

o Some types can be manufactured to economically comply with EPACT efficacy

standards

E Lamps

® Exempted by EPACT

® ER = Ellipsoidal Reflector

® Filament located at one foci of elliptical reflector. Therefore, reflected light passes

through the second foci, 2 inches in front of the lamp, before it spreads out.

® Primary application in downlights with narrow apertures and open downlights to

reduce losses within the fixture

® Longer neck developed so 75W ER30 was a direct replacement for 150W R40.

Overall length the same. Also, longer neck accommodated the filament support

structure within the lamp.

First developed in late 1970s - too late for inclusion in C78.1 1980 - added in 1994

EE-RM-94-220-IF COMMENT 27C-3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONTAY RAYSHAW BREWER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 485 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
##### 



Fiscal Year EndedOctober 28,
    
    
    October 29,
    
    
    October 30,
    
    
    October 25,
    
    
    October 26,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002(Dollars in Thousands)Historical:Net income/(loss)


    
    $
    (16,836
    )


    
    $
    (6,199
    )
    
    $
    (461
    )
    
    $
    4,528
    
    
    $
    5,926Income tax provision/(benefit)
    
    
    (14,261
    )
    
    
    (7,768
    )
    
    
    (3,499
    )
    
    
    1,579
    
    
    
    569Net income/(loss) before tax
    
    $
    (31,097
    )
    
    $
    (13,967
    )
    
    $
    (3,960
    )
    
    $
    6,107
    
    
    $
    6,495Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    23,652
    
    
    $
    25,601
    
    
    $
    22,705
    
    
    $
    21,257
    
    
    $
    21,434Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    (7,445
    )
    
    $
    11,634
    
    
    $
    18,745
    
    
    $
    27,364
    
    
    $
    27,929Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)
    
    
    
    x
    
    
    
    x
    
    
    
    x
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    
    1.3
    x
 (1)
    
    For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings available to cover fixed charges, earnings consist of income before taxes plus fixed charges.
Fixed charges consist of interest on indebtedness including amortization of deferred financing fees and fixed loan guarantee fees. No ratio
is presented for the fiscal period ended October 28, 2006, October 29, 2005 or  October 20, 2004 as the earnings for those periods
were $31,097,000, $13,967,000 and $3,960,000, respectively, less than the fixed charges.
Order entered April 8, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00128-CV

IN RE RYAN GALLAGHER

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-16008

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 7, 2020 motion requesting a copy of the 

transcript. We GRANT the motion as follows. We DIRECT the Clerk of this 

Court to send appellant a CD-Rom of both the clerk’s record filed on February 11, 

2020 and the reporter’s record filed on March 10, 2020.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
### §1486. Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund

The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund shall be available to the Secretary for actions taken under sections 1474 and 1476 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §17, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 101–380, title II, §2001, Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 506.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–380 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The revolving fund established under section 1321(k) of this title shall be available to the Secretary for Federal actions and activities under section 1474 of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–380 applicable to incidents occurring after Aug. 18, 1990, see section 1020 of Pub. L. 101–380, set out as an Effective Date note under section 2701 of this title.
#### Ratoneyck Corporation, Respondent, v. Frank S. Somma, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Albany County Court affirming the judgment of eviction made by the Albany City Court. The tenant-appellant never accepted the proposal embodied in the letter of May 17, 1945. Furthermore the landlord-respondent was not a party to the proposal, nor was it a party to nor did it subsequently ratify any agreement to extend the terms of the lease or to make other space in the building available. The trial court correctly *839excluded the evidence relative to such an alleged agreement and properly granted the order of eviction as a matter of law. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Preview Travel, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-
43875) of our reports dated January 28, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Preview Travel, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
1997 and 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which
reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                   /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Francisco, California
March 30, 1998
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 801 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-04-027 April 27, 2004

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO MEET WITH EXELON GENERATION COMPANY 

TO DISCUSS PERFORMANCE OF DRESDEN NUCLEAR PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon

Generation Company on Thursday, April 29, to discuss the results of the agency’s assessment of safety

performance at the Dresden Nuclear Power Plant during 2003. The facility, which has two reactor

units, is located near Morris, Illinois.

The meeting will be held at 6:30 p.m. at the Grundy County Administration Building, 1320

Union Street, in Morris. The public is invited to observe the meeting, and NRC officials will be

available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer questions from the public. In addition, the

NRC staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

The NRC has concluded that the plant operated safely last year, and plant performance does not

require additional inspections beyond the normal inspection program. Routine inspections are

performed by the two NRC resident inspectors assigned to the plant and by inspection specialists from

the NRC’s Region III office in Lisle, Illinois. 

In its assessment, the NRC notes that two violations were issued against the company last year

for providing incomplete and inaccurate information to the Commission. One instance occurred in

2001 and the second in 2003. The NRC has completed inspections to review the company’s

corrective actions for these two violations and found the actions taken to be acceptable.

A March 4 letter from the NRC to Exelon officials addresses the performance of the plant

during 2003 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/dres_2003q4.pdf

With regard to security issues, the NRC has issued several orders and threat advisories to

enhance security capabilities and improve guard force readiness since the terrorist attacks on

September 11, 2001. The agency has also conducted inspections to review the implementation of these

requirements and has monitored the action of plant operators in response to changing threat conditions. 

The NRC will continue security inspections during 2004.

Current performance indicators and inspection findings for the Dresden plant are available on

the NRC web site at: 

(Unit 2) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DRES2/dres2_chart.html and 
-2-

(Unit3) http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DRES3/dres3_chart.html (Note: Unit 1 has

been shut down since 1978 and is in decommissioning status.)

###