alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3061. Cooperation with and transfer to military departments

#### (a) Transfers of resources and officers during national emergency

#### (1) Transfers authorized

The President may, whenever in the judgment of the President a sufficient national emergency exists, transfer to the service and jurisdiction of a military department such vessels, equipment, stations, and officers of the Administration as the President considers to be in the best interest of the country.

#### (2) Responsibility for funding of transferred resources and officers

After any such transfer all expenses connected therewith shall be defrayed out of the appropriations for the department to which the transfer is made.

#### (3) Return of transferred resources and officers

Such transferred vessels, equipment, stations, and officers shall be returned to the Administration when the national emergency ceases, in the opinion of the President.

#### (4) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed as transferring the Administration or any of its functions from the Department of Commerce except in time of national emergency and to the extent provided in this section.

#### (b) Limitation on transfer of officers

This section does not authorize the transfer of an officer of the Administration to a military department if the accession or retention of that officer in that military department is otherwise not authorized by law.

#### (c) Status of transferred officers

An officer of the Administration transferred under this section, shall, while under the jurisdiction of a military department, have proper military status and shall be subject to the laws, regulations, and orders for the government of the Army, Navy, or Air Force, as the case may be, insofar as the same may be applicable to persons whose retention permanently in the military service of the United States is not contemplated by law.

(Pub. L. 107–372, title II, §251, Dec. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 3090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 855 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–372.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under this section delegated to Secretary of Commerce by section 1(k) of Ex. Ord. No. 11023, May 28, 1962, 27 F.R. 5131, as amended, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

83 FR 64630, 17 December 2018.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Wednesday, December 19, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

The following item will not be considered during the Open Meeting on Wednesday, July 18, 2018:
      - Whether to issue a Request for Comment on nature and content of quarterly reports and earnings releases issued by reporting companies.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: December 18, 2018.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-27753 Filed 12-18-18; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-088 June 30, 2006

NRC EXTENDS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING A

NATIONAL SOURCE TRACKING SYSTEM FOR CERTAIN SEALED SOURCES

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has extended the public comment period on the change in

the basis for the proposed rule implementing a National Source Tracking System (NSTS), which would

enhance controls for certain sealed radioactive materials used in industry, academia and medicine. The

change in basis is from the NRC’s authority to promote the common defense and security to the NRC’s

authority to protect public health and safety. Comments will be accepted until July 28, 2006.

Interested parties may submit comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Comments may also be

e-mailed to: SECY@nrc.gov, or sent through the NRC's rulemaking Web page at

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov . Comments may also be hand delivered to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,

Md., 20852, between 7:30 am and 4:15 pm on federal workdays. Faxed comments made be sent to:

Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at (301) 415-1101. Please include the number RIN

3150-AH48 in the subject line of all comments. 

Comments on rulemakings are made available to the public in their entirety on the NRC

rulemaking Web site. Personal information will not be removed.

The Federal Register notices and other documents related to this rulemaking can be seen at:

http://ruleforum.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/library?source=*&library=tracking_lib&file=*&st=prule .

###
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1728

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure equal treatment for members of reserve components who perform inactive-duty training in determining their entitlement for aviation incentive pay and hazardous duty 

pay. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2003

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure equal 

treatment for members of reserve components who perform inactive-duty training in determining their entitlement for aviation incentive pay and hazardous duty pay.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1728 IH 

1 SECTION 1. EQUAL TREATMENT OF RESERVE COMPONENT 

2 MEMBERS PERFORMING INACTIVE-DUTY 

3 TRAINING FOR RECEIPT OF AVIATION CA4 REER INCENTIVE PAY AND HAZARDOUS DUTY 

5 PAY. 

6 (a) HAZARDOUS DUTY INCENTIVE PAY.—Section 

7 301 of title 37, United States Code, is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a) by inserting after ‘‘basic 

9 pay’’ in the first sentence the following: ‘‘under sec10 tion 204 of this title or compensation under section 

11 206 of this title’’; and 

12 (2) by striking subsection (f). 

13 (b) OFFICER AVIATION CAREER INCENTIVE PAY.—

14 Section 301a of such title is amended—

15 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by inserting after 

16 ‘‘basic pay’’ the following: ‘‘under section 204 of this 

17 title or compensation under section 206 of this 

18 title’’; 

19 (2) by striking subsection (d); and 

20 (3) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub21 section (d). 

22 (c) CAREER ENLISTED FLYERS INCENTIVE PAY.—

23 Section 320 of such title is amended—

24 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘, or is en25 titled to pay under section 206 of this title as de26 scribed in subsection (e) of this section’’ and insert-
3

•HR 1728 IH 

1 ing ‘‘or compensation under section 206 of this 

2 title’’; 

3 (2) by striking subsection (e); and 

4 (3) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h), 

5 and (i) as subsections (e), (f), (g), and (h), respec6 tively. 

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall take effect on October 1, 2003, and apply 

9 to duty described in sections 301, 301a, and 320 of such 

10 title performed on or after that date.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,610-02

EX PARTE KENNETH WAYNE BELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C34388-CR IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW

FROM NAVARRO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to forty-three years’ imprisonment. 

In a single ground, Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. We

remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial

court has determined that trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. We agree. Trial counsel,

“retained or appointed, has the duty, obligation and responsibility to consult with and fully to advise

his client concerning meaning and effect of the judgment rendered by the court, his right to appeal
2

from that judgment, the necessity of giving notice of appeal and taking other steps to pursue an

appeal, as well as expressing his professional judgment as to possible grounds for appeal and their

merit, and delineating advantages and disadvantages of appeal.” Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 374

(Tex. Crim. App. 1988); see also Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 702-03 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). 

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in cause number C34388 from the CountyCourt at Law of Navarro County. 

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of

this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent

and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to

represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been

imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant

desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the

trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: March 12, 2014

Do not publish
#### § 2418.15 How will the FLRA refer FLRA debts to private collection agencies?

The FLRA will transfer delinquent FLRA debts to the Financial Management Service to obtain debt-collection services provided by private collection agencies. See § 2418.9.
#### § 182.54 Verification of claim for drawback, waiver or reduction of duties.

The allowance of a claim for drawback, waiver or reduction of duties submitted under this subpart is subject to such verification, including verification with the Canadian or Mexican customs administration, of any documentation obtained in Canada or Mexico and submitted in connection with the claim, as CBP may deem necessary.

[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35590, July 6, 2021]
### §401. Establishment of research laboratory; duties

The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the United States Bureau of Mines, is authorized and directed to establish, equip, and maintain a research laboratory in the lignite-consuming region of North Dakota to conduct researches and investigations on the mining, preparation, and utilization of lignite coal and to develop new scientific, chemical, and technical uses and new and extended markets and outlets for lignite coal and its products. Such laboratory shall be planned as a center for information and assistance in matters pertaining to conserving lignite coal resources for national defense and security; to the more efficient mining, preparation, and utilization of lignite coal; and pertaining to safety, health, and sanitation in mining operations and other matters relating to problems of the lignite industry.

(Mar. 25, 1948, ch. 146, §1, 62 Stat. 85.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Transfer of Functions

For provisions relating to closure and transfer of functions of the United States Bureau of Mines, see note set out under section 1 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Appropriations

Act Mar. 25, 1948, ch. 146, §5, 62 Stat. 85, provided that: "In order to carry out the purposes of this Act [enacting this chapter] there is hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of (a) $750,000 for the erection and equipment of a building or buildings, including plumbing, lighting, heating, general service, and experimental equipment and apparatus, the necessary roads, walks, and ground improvement, and land for the site of the building if no land is donated; and (b) $250,000 annually for the maintenance and operation of the experimental station, including personal services, supplies, equipment, and expenses of travel and subsistence."
|   | 1. | I      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Multimedia      Games, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                                           |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      September 28, 2009  | By:    | /s/ Anthony      Sanfilippo                     |   |
|                                |   | Anthony      Sanfilippo                                        |   |
|                                |   | President      and                                             |   |
|                                |   | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

----
Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

FILED 

JUN 2 7 2016 

CLE RI 

TLA1 it7'4 9) 

E K. LINDEMAN 

SLIPIREME.001 

Hardesty 

,J. 

, J. 

Pickering 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

CODY LEAVITT, No. 70509 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dying a 

postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial 

District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge. 

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. 

Specifically, the district court entered its order denying appellant's 

petition on March 30, 2016. The district court served notice of entry of 

that order on appellant on April 4, 2016. Appellant did not file the notice 

of appeal, however, until May 18, 2016, nine days after the expiration of 

the thirty-day appeal period prescribed by NRS 34.575. "[A]n untimely 

notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State, 

110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude 

that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' 

'In light of this order, we deny as moot the pro se motions filed on 

June 14, 2016. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

- 2a15-1 01 1947A e 
cc: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge 

Cody Leavitt 

Attorney GenerallCarson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e 2
### §535. Congressional consent to construction, maintenance, and operation of international bridges; conditions of consent

The consent of Congress is hereby granted to the construction, maintenance, and operation of any bridge and approaches thereto, which will connect the United States with any foreign country (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as an "international bridge") and to the collection of tolls for its use, so far as the United States has jurisdiction. Such consent shall be subject to (1) the approval of the proper authorities in the foreign country concerned; (2) the provisions of sections 491 to 494 and 495 to 498 of this title, except section 496 of this title, whether or not such bridge is to be built across or over any of the navigable waters of the United States; and (3) of the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 92–434, §2, Sept. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 731.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 92–434, §1, Sept. 26, 1972, 86 Stat. 731, provided: "That this Act [enacting this subchapter and amending section 129 of Title 23, Highways] may be cited as the 'International Bridge Act of 1972'."
§ 302.302 Examination of applicants. ( a ) *Eligibility.* An evaluation of the qualifications of applicants for positions covered by this part may be conducted at any time before an appointment is made. The evaluation may involve only determination of eligibility or ineligibility or may include qualitative rating of candidates. If the evaluation involves only basic eligibility numerical scores will not be assigned and eligible candidates will be referred in accordance with the procedures described in paragraph (b)(5) of § 302.304. If qualitative ranking is desired, numerical scores may be assigned in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. Each agency shall make a part of the records the reasons for its decision to use ranked or unranked referral and, for ranked actions, the quality ranking factors used. This information shall be made available to an applicant on his/her request.
( b ) *Rating.* Numerical scores will be assigned on a scale of 100. Each applicant who meets the qualification requirements for the position established under § 302.202 will be assigned a rating of 70 or more and will be eligible for appointment. Candidates scoring 70 or more will receive additional points for veteran preference as provided in § 302.201. Numerical ratings are not required when all qualified applicants will be offered immediate appointment. When there is an excessive number of applicants, numerical ratings are required only for a sufficient number of the highest qualified applicants to meet the anticipated needs of the agency within a reasonable period of time. The agency must, however, adopt procedures to insure the consideration of preference eligibles in the order in which they would have been considered if all applicants had been assigned numerical ratings. An agency shall furnish a notice of the rating assigned to an applicant on his/her request.
( c ) *Nonpreference applicants for certain positions.* An agency may not consider or rate an application for the position of elevator operator, messenger, guard, or custodian submitted by a nonpreference eligible as long as at least three qualified preference eligibles are available for the position.
( d ) *Evaluating experience.* When experience is a factor in determining eligibility, an agency shall credit a preference eligible ( 1 ) with time spent in the military service of the United States if the position for which he/she is applying is similar to the position which he/she held immediately before his/her entrance into the military service; and
( 2 ) with all valuable experience, including experience gained in religious, civic, welfare, service, and organizational activities, regardless of whether pay was received therefor.
NRC NEWS U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov 

No. I-03-037 May 27, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

 Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331 

NRC TO DISCUSS APPARENT VIOLATION WITH WASHINGTON, D.C., HOSPITAL

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of a Washington, D.C.,

medical facility on Wednesday, June 4, to discuss an apparent violation of agency regulations

involving the use of nuclear materials. Specifically, an NRC inspector identified a failure at Howard

University Hospital to perform adequate radiological surveys in areas where nuclear medicine

materials are used.

 The predecisional enforcement conference, which will be open to the public for observation,

is scheduled to begin at 10:30 a.m. in the Public Meeting Room at the NRC Region I Office in King

of Prussia, Pa. NRC officials will be available before the conclusion of the meeting to answer

questions.

 On March 18-19 and April 10, an NRC inspector conducted a safety inspection at the

hospital, located on Georgia Avenue, N.W. In the course of that review, the inspector performed a

confirmatory radiological survey in areas where licensed nuclear medicine materials are used. This

survey was performed after hospital employees had already completed their own end-of-day survey.

The NRC inspector discovered eight areas of contamination, which created the potential for

radiological exposure to patients, workers and others above regulatory limits. The inspector also

determined there were deficiencies in the way the hospital’s surveys were conducted. Subsequent

surveys by the hospital’s radiation safety staff also found areas of contamination.

 At the predecisional enforcement conference, hospital officials will have an opportunity to

provide their perspectives on the inspection finding and to explain why they may or may not agree

with it. The NRC, for its part, will not make any decisions regarding the apparent violation at the

conference. Rather, those decisions will be made at a later date by senior agency managers.

###