alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2314b. Advanced modeling technologies

#### (a) In general

To the greatest extent practicable, the Secretary shall encourage and incorporate advanced modeling technologies, including 3-dimensional digital modeling, that can expedite project delivery or improve the evaluation of water resources development projects that receive Federal funding by—

(1) accelerating and improving the environmental review process;

(2) increasing effective public participation;

(3) enhancing the detail and accuracy of project designs;

(4) increasing safety;

(5) accelerating construction and reducing construction costs; or

(6) otherwise achieving the purposes described in paragraphs (1) through (5).

#### (b) Activities

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary, to the greatest extent practicable, shall—

(1) compile information related to advanced modeling technologies, including industry best practices with respect to the use of the technologies;

(2) disseminate to non-Federal interests the information described in paragraph (1); and

(3) promote the use of advanced modeling technologies.

(Pub. L. 113–121, title I, §1034, June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1234.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 113–121, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,523,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (16,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    635,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,078,000
<PP&E>                                         531,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 389,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,654,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,661,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,221,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (12,496,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,654,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,000
<CGS>                                          61,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,992,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             244,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,121,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,121,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,121,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.34)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS -- REGION I

 475 Allendale Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406

No. I-03-026 April 4, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, (610) 337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil A. Sheehan, (610) 337-5331

NRC TO DISCUSS ANNUAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

OF JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

 Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Entergy Nuclear

Generation Company on Wednesday, April 9, to discuss the results of the agency’s annual assessment

of safety performance at the James A. FitzPatrick nuclear power plant. The facility is located in

Scriba, N.Y.

 The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m.

at the Emergency Operations Facility/Joint News Center for the plant, located at the Oswego County

Airport, 2262 N.Y. State Route 176 in Fulton, N.Y. Before the session is adjourned, NRC staff will be

available to answer questions from the public on the safety performance of the FitzPatrick plant, as

well as the role of the NRC in ensuring safe plant operation.

 The performance period to be discussed is January 1 to December 31, 2002. In addition, NRC

staff will provide an overview of how the agency’s Reactor Oversight Process works.

 A letter sent from the NRC Region I Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

facility during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/fitz_2002q4.pdf

 “Overall, FitzPatrick operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety, and fully

met all cornerstone objectives,” the letter states. Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct only baseline

inspections at the site through March 31, 2004.

 The letter also notes: “As you are aware, since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the

NRC has issued several Orders and threat advisories to enhance security capabilities and improve

guard force readiness. We have conducted inspections to review your implementation of these

requirements and have monitored your actions in response to changing threat conditions. For calendar

year 2003, we plan to continue these inspections, conduct portions of the security baseline inspection 
program, as well as perform additional inspections to evaluate your compliance with new requirements

that may be ordered. “

 Current performance information for FitzPatrick is available on the NRC web site at:

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/FITZ/fitz_chart.html

 ###
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Region III Office of Public Affairs

801 Warrenville Road, Lisle, IL 60532-4351

NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT: RIII-97-85 Sept. 19, 1997

CONTACT: Jan Strasma 630/829-9663

Angela Dauginas 630/829-9662

E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

NRC SPECIAL EVALUATION TEAM TO MEET SEPT. 24 WITH ILLINOIS POWER

TO BEGIN REVIEW AT CLINTON NUCLEAR POWER STATION

A Nuclear Regulatory Commission Special Evaluation Team will meet

Wednesday, September 24, with Illinois Power Company to begin its onsite

review of performance at the Clinton Nuclear Power Station, including the

utility's ongoing Integrated Safety Assessment being performed by industry

peers.

The meeting will be at 10 a.m. in the utility's Energy and Environmental

Center on Illinois Highway 54 east of Clinton. It is open to public

observation.

The meeting will discuss the objectives, scope, and schedule of the NRC

team's evaluation of the utility's Integrated Safety Assessment and the

independent review of Clinton plant performance by the team. The 10-member

team is headed by Kenneth E. Perkins, Jr., who is Director of the NRC's Field

Office in Walnut Creek, California.

The NRC team will observe the work of the utility assessment at the

Clinton site September 24-October 3. Its independent onsite follow-up is

scheduled for October 20-31.

The NRC team will discuss its findings in a meeting with the utility

which will be open to the public, tentatively scheduled for early December.

Written reports of both the utility and NRC reviews will be available to the

public.

Because of a declining performance trend at the Clinton plant, NRC

senior staff managers recommended to the Commission in June that either an NRC

diagnostic evaluation be performed at Clinton or that a similar examination be

done by the utility with NRC oversight. As a result of these concerns,

Illinois Power decided on the independent safety assessment process using a

team of industry peers and outside consultants.

#

(Note: The NRC's Special Evaluation Team was discussed in News Announcement

RIII-97-78, issued August 22.)
§ 214.401 Types of positions. There are two types of positions in the Senior Executive Service: ( a ) General positions, which may be filled by a career, noncareer, limited emergency, or limited term appointee.
( b ) Career reserved positions, which may be filled only by a career appointee.
#### § 295.206 Final determination.

The General Counsel makes the final determination on demands and requests to employees for production of official records and information or testimony. All final determinations are within the sole discretion of the General Counsel. The General Counsel will notify the requester and the court or other authority of the final determination, the reasons for the grant or denial of the demand or request, and any conditions that the General Counsel may impose on the release of records or information, or on the testimony of an OPM employee.
#### § 2641.106 Applicability of certain provisions to Vice President.

Subsections 207(d) (relating to restrictions on very senior personnel) and 207(f) (restrictions with regard to foreign entities) of title 18, United States Code, apply to a Vice President, to the same extent as they apply to employees and former employees covered by those provisions. *See* §§ 2641.205 and 2641.206. There are no other restrictions in 18 U.S.C. 207 applicable to a Vice President.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                                                                      BANK LEUMI

                                               February 12, 2004


Mr. Gary Granoff
Elk Associates Funding Corp.
747 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017

Dear Gary:

We are pleased to confirm that we hold available a line of credit for Elk
Associates Funding Corp. in the amount of $8,000,000.00 subject to various terms
and conditions as discussed with you.

Credit availability under this line is also subject to the receipt of and
continuing satisfaction with current financial and other information which
current information is to be furnished by you to the Bank as we may, from time
to time, require.

The line of credit expires on October 31, 2004.

As in the past, the line of credit may be withdrawn at the Bank's sole
discretion at any time.

If you have any questions, please call me.

                                                       Very truly yours,


                                                       By: /s/ Iris Schechter
                                                           ---------------------
                                                           Iris Schechter
                                                           Vice President

IS/r
### §1366. Appearance

The Administrator shall request the Attorney General to appear and represent the United States in any civil or criminal action instituted under this chapter to which the Administrator is a party. Unless the Attorney General notifies the Administrator within a reasonable time, that he will appear in a civil action, attorneys who are officers or employees of the Environmental Protection Agency shall appear and represent the United States in such action.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 889.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

MOUNTECH IP LLC,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC.,

 Defendant.

Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-23178-WPD

TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Mountech IP LLC 

(“Mountech IP”) states that it is a limited liability company. It does not have a parent corporation 

and no publicly held corporation owns ten percent (10%) or more of its stock.

Dated: July 31, 2020 Respectfully submitted,

SAND, SEBOLT & WERNOW CO., LPA

/s/ Howard L. Wernow

Howard L. Wernow B.C.S. 

Florida Bar No. 107560

Aegis Tower – Suite 1100

4940 Munson Street NW 

Canton, OH 44718 

Phone: 330-244-1174 

Fax: 330-244-1173 

Email: howard.wernow@sswip.com

Board Certified in Intellectual Property Law

By the Florida Bar

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

Case 1:20-cv-23178-WPD Document 5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/31/2020 Page 1 of 1
### §567b. Pollution of Potomac drainage basin; control by State compacts

The consent of Congress is given to the States of Maryland and West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Virginia and Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia to enter into the compact to create a Potomac Valley Conservancy District and to establish an Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Provided, That nothing contained in such compact shall be construed as impairing or in any manner affecting any right or jurisdiction of the United States in and over the region which forms the subject of this compact.

(July 11, 1940, ch. 579, 54 Stat. 748.)
Home > NRC Library > ADAMS Public Documents

# R. Dennis Brown Ltr re: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Observation Report No. OAR-05-03, "Observation of U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Quality Assurance Annual Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Quality Assurance Program Review at Bettis Atomic.

Accession Number: ML051540256

Date Released: Monday, June 27, 2005

Package Contents

The following links on this page are to Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) files. To obtain a free viewer for displaying this format, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.
    - ML051540348 - R. Dennis Brown Ltr re:  NRC Observation Report No. OAR-05-03, "Observation of DOE Office of  Quality Assurance Annual Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Quality Assurance Program Review at Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory on April 28, 2005. (5 page(s), 6/17/2005)
    - ML051540370 - R. Dennis Brown enclosure:  The NRC Observation Report No. OAR-05-03, "Observation of DOE, Office of Quality Assurance Annual Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program Quality Assurance Program Review at Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory on April 27-28, 2005". (5 page(s), 6/17/2005)

Privacy PolicySite Disclaimer
AMENDMENT TO 10-Q - TO ADD EXHIBIT 27

                        UNITED STATES
             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                   Washington, D.C.  20549
                              
                              
                              
                          FORM 10-Q
                              
     (Mark One)

[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934

      For the quarterly period ended  June 28, 1996 or
                              
 [   ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
             the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                              
      For the transition period from _______ to _______

                 Commission File Number:  0-21204


                 SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC.
   (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
                              
               Delaware                     63-1083246
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)


    Highway 41 North, P.O. Box 390, Addison, Alabama  35540
   (Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip Code)

                       (205) 747-8589
    (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
                              

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1)  has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2)  has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                     Yes  [X]   No  [  ]


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.


 15,101,706 shares of Common Stock, $.0001 par value, as of
                        July 23, 1996
                              
                              
                              
                              
                              
                              
                         SIGNATURES
                              

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.







                              SOUTHERN ENERGY HOMES, INC.



Date: August 5, 1996          By:
                                       Wendell L. Batchelor,
                                        President
                                        and Chief Executive
Officer




Date: August 5, 1996          By:
                                       Keith W. Brown, Chief
Financial Officer,
                                       Treasurer and
Secretary
#### Andrew MONAGHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jessica Monaghan; et al., Plaintiffs, v. A. TREBEX; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-16560.

D.C. No. CV-01-00938-WHA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 13, 2002 *.

Decided May 28, 2002.

Before FERNANDEZ, RYMER and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Monaghan’s request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Andrew Monaghan appeals pro se the dismissal of his “invidious discrimination” action against various television personalities and entertainment executives and the district court’s order designating him as a vexatious litigant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998). We review the entry of a vexatious litigant order for abuse of discretion. *De Long v. Hennessey,*912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.1990). We affirm.

Monaghan’s claim that he is the object of a nationwide conspiracy, wherein various television personalities terrorize him over the airwaves with verbal threats and menacing gestures, lacks an arguable basis in either law or fact, and is therefore frivolous. *See Martin v. Sias,*88 F.3d 774, 775 (9th Cir.1996). The district court properly dismissed without leave to amend, because amendment would be futile. *See Cato v. United States,*70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir.1995).

To maintain general access to the courts while safeguarding against abusively excessive litigation, a court must satisfy four prerequisites before entering a vexatious litigant order: “(1) a plaintiff must be given adequate notice to oppose a restrictive pre-filing order before it is entered; (2) a trial court must present an adequate record for review by listing the case filings that support its order; (3) the trial court must further make substantive findings as to the frivolousness or harassing nature of the plaintiffs filings; and (4) the order must be narrowly tailored to remedy only the plaintiffs particular abuses.” *O’Loughlin v. Doe,*920 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir.1990).

Monaghan was deemed a vexatious litigant after receiving notice and appearing at a show-cause hearing. The district court found Monaghan’s claims to be duplicative of equally fanciful allegations filed with the court in seven other cases involving many of the same defendants. The district court’s requirement that any future complaints by Monaghan must undergo pre-filing review is appropriately narrow. On this basis, the district court acted *652within its discretion in entering the vexatious litigant order. *See DeLong v. Hennessey,*912 F.2d 1144, 1147-49 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Glenoit
Asset Corporation's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of
operations for the year ending January 1, 2000, and such is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001051260
<NAME>                        Glenoit Asset Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                         25
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 49,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,940
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     40,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   49,804
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,184
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,946)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,575
<EPS-BASIC>                                    6.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  6.58


</TABLE>