alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Keith E. Palmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Bio Medica
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) [omitted]; and

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.



/s/ Keith E. Palmer
-------------------
Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President


                                       18
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa. 19406

 www.nrc.gov

No. I-03-050 August 20, 2003

CONTACT: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC ASSIGNS NEW RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO SALEM NUCLEAR PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in the Region I office in King of Prussia have

selected George J. Malone as a resident inspector at Salem Station, in Hancocks Bridge, N.J. He

joins Senior Resident Inspector Daniel Orr at the two-unit nuclear power plant site. Malone

replaces Fred Bower who was reassigned as a region-based inspector. 

Malone joined the NRC in March 2002 as an operations engineer in the Region I Division

of Reactor Safety. Prior to joining the agency, he worked as an engineer at Bechtel-Bettis, Inc.,

in Charleston, S.C. He has a master’s and a bachelor’s degree in nuclear engineering from the

University of Illinois. 

Each U.S. commercial nuclear power plant has at least two NRC resident inspectors.

They serve as the agency's eyes and ears at the facility, conducting regular inspections,

monitoring significant work projects and interacting with plant workers and the public.

The Salem resident inspectors can be reached at 856/935-5151.

###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 <LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's financial statements included in its report on Form 10-Q for the
six months ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements included in such report.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000895648
<NAME> GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       5,267,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                 432,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,080,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,100,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          337,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,444,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,080,081
<SALES>                                        327,509
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   178
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,191
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,191
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
On August 13, 2013, staff from EPA met with the American Chemistry Council and some of their 

membership to discuss the proposed regulations implementing the Formaldehyde Standards for 

Composite Wood Products Act. ACC raised concerns related to harmonization with California’s 

formaldehyde standards for composite wood products, issues with the benefits assessment for the 

proposals, the number of laminators that will convert to no-added formaldehyde resins, and the 

perceived use of higher humidity/temperature testing to justify disparate treatment of products made 

with ultra-low emitting formaldehyde resins. ACC emphasized that the formaldehyde emissions 

standards set by the statute were meant to be performance based, allowing a wide range of resins and 

manufacturing technologies to address formaldehyde emissions.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-06-017 April 19, 2006

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS 2005 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

FOR DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of Exelon Generation

Co. on Wednesday, April 26, to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance for last year at

the Dresden Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located near Morris, Ill.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m. at the Grundy

County Administration Center, 1320 Union Street, in Morris. The NRC will respond to questions or

comments before the close of the meeting

“The NRC continually reviews the performance of the Dresden plant and the nation’s other

commercial nuclear power facilities,” NRC Region III Administrator James Caldwell said. “This

meeting will provide an opportunity for a discussion of our annual assessment of safety performance

with the company and with local officials and residents who live near the plant. Our goal is to explain

the NRC oversight process and make as much information as possible available to the public regarding

our regulation of these facilities.”

A letter sent from the NRC Region III Office to plant officials addresses the performance of the

plant during the period and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on the

NRC web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/dres_2005q4.pdf.

The NRC’s assessment concluded that the Dresden plant operated safely during the period. 

The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess nuclear plant

performance. The colors start with “green” and then increase to “white,” “yellow” or “red,”

commensurate with the safety significance of the issues involved. 

All of the inspection findings and performance indicators for Dresden during 2005 were

determined to be “green.” As a result of this performance, the NRC will conduct the normal, baseline

level of inspections during the upcoming year.

Routine inspections are performed by two NRC Resident Inspectors assigned to the plant and

by inspection specialists from the Region III Office in Lisle, Ill. Among the areas of plant operations

to be inspected this year by NRC specialists are access control to radiologically significant areas,

licensed operator qualification program, and radioactive material processing and transportation.
In addition, the NRC plans to conduct an inspection to review the activities related to the

planned steam dryer replacement on Unit 3. The same inspection is planned for Unit 2 in 2007. NRC

resident inspectors will also continue to monitor the plant’s corrective actions associated with the

onsite tritium leak that occurred in February.

Current performance information for Dresden is available on the NRC’s web site at: 

http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DRES2/dres2_chart.html

and http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/DRES3/dres3_chart.html.

###
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow loss injector for Space Shuttle main engine.  Center director's discretionary fundAn efficient propellant injection method to raise the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) thrust and payload is discussed. Relatively large diameter injector elements with low pressure loss are recommended for the main combustion chamber and the pre-burners. Smaller losses admit more propellant flow which then raises thrust. Payload is not only gained by specific impulse but also by thrust. The chamber pressure is stabilized by selecting the proper cavity size for the injector elements while reducing the injection pressure loss which normally is kept high for stability. The rather large injector element recesses provide acoustic damping which makes baffles and acoustic absorbers unnecessary. A tenfold reduction of flow induced stresses which are rather high in the present design is shown. Relaxed tolerances, fewer elements, and better maintenance are offered. The study was conducted under a center director discretionary fund assignment.Document ID19840011401Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsVonpragenau, G. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1984Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-82567NAS 1.15:82567Accession Number84N19469Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840011401.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
CNET Price comparisons Product reviewsTech newsDownloads

|  |
|--|
| Search Download.comIn WindowsIn DownloadsAll CNET    The Web |  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |
|--|
|  |                                                                                                                                           |  |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  | **>>TODAY ON DOWNLOAD.COM****•** Free MP3s from **Mark Farina****•****Spamfighter**: Fight the good fight for your in-box |  |
|  |
|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|--|--|--|
|  |  |
|--|--|
§ 1201.42 Disqualifying a judge. ( a ) If a judge considers himself or herself disqualified, he or she will withdraw from the case, state on the record the reasons for doing so, and another judge will be promptly assigned.
( b ) A party may file a motion asking the judge to withdraw on the basis of personal bias or other disqualification. This motion must be filed as soon as the party has reason to believe there is a basis for disqualification. The reasons for the request must be set out in an affidavit or sworn statement under 28 U.S.C. 1746. (See appendix IV.)
( c ) If the judge denies the motion, the party requesting withdrawal may request certification of the issue to the Board as an interlocutory appeal under § 1201.91 of this part. Failure to request certification is considered a waiver of the request for withdrawal.
[54 FR 53504, Dec. 29, 1989, as amended at 77 FR 62366, Oct. 12, 2012]
NRC NEWS

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION II

61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta GA 30303

Web Site: www.nrc.gov

No. II-05-031 July 7, 2005

CONTACT: Ken Clark (404)562-4416 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

Roger Hannah (404)562-4417

NRC STAFF TO MEET WITH TVA OFFICIALS IN ATLANTA 

TO DISCUSS BROWNS FERRY UNIT 1 RESTART

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials will meet with Tennessee Valley Authority officials

at 1:30 p.m. (EDT) on Wednesday, July 20 to discuss the status of TVA’s restart efforts for the Unit 1

reactor at the Browns Ferry nuclear plant in Alabama. 

The meeting, which is open to the public, will be held at the NRC’s Region II office, located on

the 24th floor of the Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta. NRC officials will

be available after the business portion of the meeting to answer questions from interested observers.

The agenda for the meeting will cover completed work activities, schedules for future

milestones, challenges and other activities important to NRC oversight and inspection of Unit 1.

All three units of the Browns Ferry plant were shut down in 1985 but retained NRC operating

licenses. Unit 2 was restarted in 1991 and Unit 3 was restarted in 1995. TVA has been doing

extensive work on Unit 1 and said it expects to have that unit ready to begin operating again by 2007.

###
### §§201 to 213. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–591, §8(a), Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3435

Section 201, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 100, related to ascertainment of risk of collision.

Section 202, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 100, related to sailing vessels approaching one another.

Section 203, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 100; Aug. 21, 1935, ch. 595, §2, 49 Stat. 669, related to steam vessels approaching, meeting, or passing one another.

Section 204, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101, related to steam vessels crossing.

Section 205, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101; Nov. 5, 1966, Pub. L. 89–764, §1, 80 Stat. 1313, related to steam and sailing vessels meeting.

Section 206, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101, provided that vessel having the right of way was to keep course.

Section 207, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101, related to situation when a vessel crosses ahead of a vessel having the right-of-way.

Section 208, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101, related to duty of steam vessels to slacken speed.

Section 209, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101, provided that an overtaking vessel keep out of the way and defined the term "overtaking vessel".

Section 210, acts June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 101; Nov. 5, 1966, Pub. L. 89–764, §2, 80 Stat. 1313, related to operation of steam vessels in a narrow channel.

Section 211, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 102, related to right of way of fishing vessels or boats.

Section 212, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 102, provided for departure from the rules in special circumstances.

Section 213, act June 7, 1897, ch. 4, §1, 30 Stat. 102, related to signal to be given that a vessel's engines are going at full speed astern.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 24, 1981, see section 7 of Pub. L. 96–591, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1604 of this title.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements  for the six month  period  ended  October 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                            OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                                      188,479
<SECURITIES>                                              1,411,866
<RECEIVABLES>                                                48,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                  51,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          1,699,601
<PP&E>                                                       78,073
<DEPRECIATION>                                               23,000
[OTHER-ASSETS]                                              114,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            1,892,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        27,827
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       1
<COMMON>                                                    125,651
<OTHER-SE>                                                4,415,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              1,892,339
<SALES>                                                      48,587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             48,587
<CGS>                                                        25,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               425,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            127,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (403,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (275,218)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (.02)
        

</TABLE>
### §2350. Corrosion prevention

#### (a) In general

To the greatest extent practicable, the Secretary shall encourage and incorporate corrosion prevention activities at water resources development projects.

#### (b) Activities

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary, to the greatest extent practicable, shall ensure that contractors performing work for water resources development projects—

(1) use best practices to carry out corrosion prevention activities in the field;

(2) use industry-recognized standards and corrosion mitigation and prevention methods when—

(A) determining protective coatings;

(B) selecting materials; and

(C) determining methods of cathodic protection, design, and engineering for corrosion prevention;

(3) use certified coating application specialists and cathodic protection technicians and engineers;

(4) use best practices in environmental protection to prevent environmental degradation and to ensure careful handling of all hazardous materials;

(5) demonstrate a history of employing industry-certified inspectors to ensure adherence to best practices and standards; and

(6) demonstrate a history of compliance with applicable requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

#### (c) Corrosion prevention activities defined

In this section, the term "corrosion prevention activities" means—

(1) the application and inspection of protective coatings for complex work involving steel and cementitious structures, including structures that will be exposed in immersion;

(2) the installation, testing, and inspection of cathodic protection systems; and

(3) any other activities related to corrosion prevention the Secretary determines appropriate.

#### (d) Report

In the first annual report submitted to Congress after December 16, 2016, in accordance with section 556 of this title, and section 2295(b) of this title, the Secretary shall report on the corrosion prevention activities encouraged under this section, including—

(1) a description of the actions the Secretary has taken to implement this section; and

(2) a description of the projects utilizing corrosion prevention activities, including which activities were undertaken.

(Pub. L. 113–121, title I, §1033, June 10, 2014, 128 Stat. 1233; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, §1142, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1658.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–322 added subsec. (d).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Secretary" Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 113–121, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.