alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGION III

801 Warrenville Road

Lisle, IL 60532

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. III-01-021 June 5, 2001

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630)829-9663/e-mail: rjs2@nrc.gov

Pam Alloway-Mueller (630)829-9662/e-mail: pla@nrc.gov

NRC NAMES NEW SENIOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR

AT BYRON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials in Lisle, Illinois, have announced the assignment of

Richard Skokowski as the agency’s senior resident inspector at the Byron Nuclear Power Plant in

Byron, Illinois.

Skokowski joined the NRC full-time in June 1993 as a reactor engineer in the agency’s Region

I office in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. In August 1995 he became a resident inspector at the Nine

Mile Point Nuclear Power Plant in Scriba, New York, and in June 1999 he became a resident inspector

at the James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant, also in Scriba. Prior to joining the NRC, he served

seven years in the U.S. Navy as an electrical operator.

Skokowski earned a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Temple University in

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Skokowski, his wife Stephanie, and two sons will live in Sycamore,

Illinois.

Skokowski, who began his duties at Byron on June 4, joins NRC Resident Inspector Brian

Kemker at the plant. They can be reached at the plant by calling (815) 234-5451.

###
### [§§318 to 321. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title VI, §604(f)(2)(A), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3878]

Section 318, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 605; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §33(c)(1), 72 Stat. 1567; Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–649, §8(a), 76 Stat. 495, related to compensation for members of National Guard for disablement during training.

Section 319, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 605, related to compensation for members of National Guard for disablement during training when not covered by section 318 of this title.

Section 320, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 606, related to hospitalization ordered by Secretary of Army or Air Force for members of National Guard.

Section 321, acts Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 606; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–861, §2(10), 72 Stat. 1544; Sept. 7, 1962, Pub. L. 87–649, §8(b), 76 Stat. 495, related to death gratuities for members of National Guard.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to persons who, after Nov. 14, 1986, incur or aggravate an injury, illness, or disease or die, see section 604(g) of Pub. L. 99–661, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 1074a of Title 10, Armed Forces.
Exhibit
      32.1




SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION (CEO) 1350




FIRST
      GROWTH INVESTORS, INC.




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of First Growth Investors, Inc., the
“Company”, on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof , the “Report”, I, Gao
      Zhentao, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and President of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 31, 2008




/s/
                Gao ZhentaoGao
                ZhentaoChief
                Executive Officer, director
May 10, 2000



Global Industries, Ltd.
8000 Global Drive
Carlyss, Louisiana 70665

Dear Sirs:

At your request, we have read the description included in
your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, of
the facts relating to changes in the methods used for
depreciating the Company's major barges and vessels from the
straight-line and units-of-production methods to a modified
units-of-production method. We believe, on the basis of the
facts so set forth and other information furnished to us by
appropriate officials of the Company, that the accounting
changes described in your Form 10-Q are to an alternative
accounting principle that is preferable under the
circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of
Global Industries, Ltd. and its consolidated subsidiaries as
of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31,
1999.  Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not
express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-
mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information furnished to
us by officials of the Company, or on the financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows of Global
Industries, Ltd. and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any
date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 1999.

Yours truly,

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1668

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

at 101 North Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United StatesCourthouse’’.

108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1668

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 101

North Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Ed

Edmondson United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1668 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 101 North

3 Fifth Street in Muskogee, Oklahoma, shall be known and

4 designated as the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States Court5 house’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Ed Edmondson United States

11 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 3,

2003.

Attest:

Clerk.
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 05-015 January 26, 2005

 NRC COMMISSIONER LYONS TAKES OATH OF OFFICE

 JANUARY 25

Peter B. Lyons was sworn in as a commissioner of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

yesterday at 1:00 p.m. by Chairman Nils J. Diaz in a brief ceremony at the NRC in Rockville, Md. 

The addition brings the NRC to its full complement of five commissioners for the first time

since March 2003. The other members of the Commission are Edward McGaffigan Jr., Jeffrey S.

Merrifield, and Gregory B. Jaczko who was sworn in last Friday (see Jan. 21 press release, No. 05-

0013).

Because Lyons was appointed by the President during a congressional recess, his term will

expire at the end of the Senate's next session in late 2006. 

Lyons, 61, served eight years as science advisor to Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and to the

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. During that time, he focused on issues of nuclear

technologies, national science policy, national and international nuclear policy, non-proliferation,

energy research and development, and hydrogen technology.

Prior to assignment in Washington, Lyons worked as a management official at the Los Alamos

National Laboratory for over 25 years supporting energy and environmental programs, industrial

interactions, nuclear test diagnostics, and strategic defense initiative programs.

Biographies of Commissioners Lyons and Jaczko will be available soon on NRC’s web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/who-we-are/organization/commfuncdesc.html .

 ###
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fred Pellicone, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction and order affirmed. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of burglary, third degree. The order denies a motion for a new trial:) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 26, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62446-62447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-23891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the

[[Page 62447]]

companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than November 9, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Cindy C. West, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Tri-State 1st Banc, Inc., East Liverpool, Ohio; to acquire MDH 
Investment Management, Inc., East Liverpool, Ohio, and thereby engage 
in permissible investment advisory activities, pusuant to section 
225.28(b)(6)(i) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 20, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-23891 Filed 10-25-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

March 16, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

JUAN CARLOS OCASIO

, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) Civil Action No. 13

- cv

- 921 (TSC)

)

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

, )

)

Defendant. )

)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Defendant moved for summary judgment in this case on October 14, 2015. ( See ECF No.

45). The court subsequently ordered Plaintiff to file his opposition or other response to

Defendant’s motion on or before November 13, 2015, warning that failure to timely make such a

filing carried with it the risk that the motion could be granted as conceded and the case dismissed

pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) . ( See ECF No. 46 )

.

To date, Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant’s motion

.

The court will therefore grant Defendant’s mot ion as conceded and dismiss this case.

A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

The Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this order using a typewritten envelope to:

JUAN CARLOS OCASIO

2245 Baker Avenue

Apartment 5D

Bronx, NY 10467

Date: November 24, 2015



## Tanya S. Chutkan

TANYA S. CHUTKANUnited States District Judge
#### § 251.301 Associations of management officials and/or supervisors.

Dues withholding for associations of management officials and/or supervisors is covered in 5 CFR 550.331.
#### § 1501.15 Transmission of Determination to the Secretary of State.

The Board shall transmit its determination in each case to the Secretary of State for transmission to the Secretary General of the United Nations, or the executive head of any other public international organization concerned. In each case in which the Board determines that, on all the evidence, there is a reasonable doubt as to the loyalty of the person involved to the Government of the United States, it shall also transmit a statement of the reasons for the Board's determination in as much detail as the Board deems that security considerations permit.
### §7303. Reports and public hearings on proposed uses of amounts

(a)(1) The chief executive officer of each State shall prepare for each fiscal year a report on the proposed use during the fiscal year of block grant amounts received by the State. The report shall include—

(A) a statement of goals and objectives;

(B) information on the types of activities to be supported, geographic areas to be served, and categories or characteristics of individuals to be served; and

(C) the criteria for, and way of, distributing the amounts, including details on the way amounts will be distributed on the basis of need to carry out the purposes of the block grant amounts.

(2) Beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 1983, each report shall describe how the State met the goals, objectives, and needs in using the amounts described in the report for the prior fiscal year.

(b) A State may not receive block grant amounts for a fiscal year until the State conducts a public hearing, after adequate public notice, on the proposed use and distribution of the amounts set out in the report prepared under subsection (a) of this section for the fiscal year.

(c) Each report prepared under subsection (a) of this section and changes to the report shall be made public in the State on a timely basis and in a way that encourages comments from interested local government and persons.

(Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1040.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 7303 | 31:1243(note). | Aug. 13, 1981, Pub. L. 97–35, §1742, 95 Stat. 763. |

In subsection (a)(1), before clause (A), the words "for each fiscal year" and "during the fiscal year" are substituted for "for the previous fiscal year" for clarity.

In subsection (b), the words "by the State" are omitted as surplus.

In subsection (c), the words "by a State" are omitted as surplus.
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.611 Appointment of certain veterans who have competed under agency merit promotion announcements. ( a ) *Agency authority.* An agency may appoint a preference eligible or a veteran who has substantially completed at least 3 years of continuous active military service provided ( 1 ) The veteran was selected from among the best qualified following competition under a merit promotion announcement open to candidates outside the agency's workforce; and
( 2 ) The veteran's most recent separation from the military was under honorable conditions.
( b ) *Definitions.* “Agency” in this context means an executive agency as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105. The agency determines in individual cases whether a candidate was released “shortly before” completing the required 3 years and should therefore be eligible for appointment.
[65 FR 14432, Mar. 17, 2000]
#### § 182.76 Repeated false or unsupported preference claims.

Where the verification reveals a pattern of conduct by the importer, exporter, or producer of false or unsupported representations relevant to a claim that a good imported into the United States qualifies for preferential tariff treatment under the USMCA, CBP may withhold preferential tariff treatment under the USMCA for entries of identical goods covered by subsequent statements, declarations, or certifications by that importer, exporter, or producer until CBP determines that representations of that person are in conformity with this part and with General Note 11, HTSUS.

[CBP Dec. 21-10, 86 FR 35592, July 6, 2021]
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1



                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plant Polymer Technologies
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on their knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ Richard C. Bernier
--------------------------------------------
Richard C. Bernier, Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Richard C. Bernier
--------------------------------------------
Richard C. Bernier, Chief Financial Officer



August 13, 2002
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs, Region I

 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.

www.nrc.gov

 

No. I-05-055 October 31, 2005

Contact: Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 Email: opa1@nrc.gov

Neil Sheehan, 610/337-5331

NRC ANNOUNCES ENHANCED OVERSIGHT OF INDIAN POINT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will conduct additional inspections at Indian Point Energy

Center in Buchanan, N.Y. Through enhanced specialized inspections the NRC will oversee Entergy's

efforts to address leakage from the Unit 2 spent fuel pool and reliability issues with the site's alert and

notification system (sirens). 

The two-unit site is operated by Entergy Nuclear. 

In late September, the NRC began a special inspection at Indian Point into apparent leakage

from the spent fuel pool area at the Indian Point 2 nuclear power plant. The leakage is minimal and

does not pose any immediate health or safety concern for members of the public or plant workers. 

Earlier this month, tritium was detected in six of nine on-site locations. No tritium has been detected

off-site. The Special Inspection is expected to continue for several additional weeks as the NRC is

monitoring and evaluating Entergy’s ongoing characterization and mitigation activities. 

The NRC also has been overseeing Entergy's actions to address recent siren issues and improve

overall system reliability. The Indian Point siren system has experienced performance problems in the

recent past including: primary and back-up actuation system problems, siren monitoring system

failures, and some actual siren failures. Additionally, Entergy has indicated that it plans to replace the

entire siren system in response to the new requirement for backup power that was included in the

Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Under the NRC's reactor oversight program, a plant's performance determines the level of

inspection conducted at the site. To provide additional oversight, the agency can decide to deviate

from the process and conduct further inspections, etc., when warranted by the given situation. Any

such plans are proposed in a memo from the Regional Administrator for approval by the Executive

Director for Operations. The memo, called a "deviation memo,” was approved earlier today and

provides a formal vehicle to document the NRC’s additional inspection plans to assess Entergy's

tritium characterization and remediation efforts, as well as the company's efforts to improve the

reliability of the siren system in the communities surrounding Indian Point. 

NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins, said, "In the case of Indian Point, the staff
considers it prudent to apply additional inspection focus to specific areas, even though licensee

performance in these areas has not crossed any specific thresholds mandating additional regulatory

oversight."

The deviation memo will be posted on the NRC web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/plantspecific-items/indian-point-issues.html. 

###
##### 



1.
    
    We have reviewed this quarterly report on 10-QSB of Planet Technologies, Inc.2.
    
    Based on our knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;3.
    
    Based on our knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly represent in all material respects the financial condition, and
results of operations of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;4.
    
    We:
 a.
    
    are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls;b.
    
    have designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to
the issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;c.
    
    have evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers internal controls as of a date
within ninety (90) days prior to the report; andd.
    
    have presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of our internal
controls based on our evaluation as of that date.
 5.
    
    We have disclosed to the issuers auditors and audit committee of the board of directors (or
persons fulfilling the equivalent function);
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the issuers auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuers internal controls; and
 6
    
    We have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 Date: November 13, 2006/s/ Scott L. GlennScott L. GlennChief Executive Officer/s/ Francesca DiNotaFrancesca DiNotaChief Financial Officer
§ 214.204 Interchange agreements. ( a ) In accordance with 5 CFR 6.7, OPM and any agency with an executive personnel system essentially equivalent to the Senior Executive Service (SES) may, pursuant to legislative and regulatory authorities, enter into an agreement providing for the movement of persons between the SES and the other system. The agreement shall define the status and tenure that the persons affected shall acquire upon the movement.
( b ) Persons eligible for movement must be serving in permanent, continuing positions with career or career-type appointments. They must meet the qualifications requirements of any position to which moved.
( c ) An interchange agreement may be discontinued by either party under such conditions as provided in the agreement.
[60 FR 6385, Feb. 2, 1995]