alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2421.9 Administrative Law Judge.

*Administrative Law Judge* means the Chief Administrative Law Judge or any Administrative Law Judge designated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge to conduct a hearing in cases under 5 U.S.C. 7116, and such other matters as may be assigned.
P.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

225) IV-E-99 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM Sheet 225 of 242 
* £--. \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Ussy ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

P.2 

W-E-99 

NAY 121993 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

- WN - 3 1993 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

THRU: 

TO: 

EPA/Industry Meeting on Onboard Refueling 

Vapor Recovery * 

Jim Bryson, Mechanical Engineer CJA*~ /PA 

Special Regulatory Projects Branph 

a*f4JPH 

Tad Wysor, Senior Project Manager 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

EPA Air Docket A-87-11 

^AW^ 

On April 27 1993, EPA staff and management met in Ann Arbor 

with representatives of American Automotive Manufacturers 

Association, Inc. and the Association of International Automobile 

Manufacturers, Inc. to discuss the status of the onboard refueling 

vapor recovery rulemaking. Attached is a list of attendees and 

their affiliations. 

At this meeting, views were exchanged between the industry 

representatives and EPA officials on the topics listed in the 

attached agenda. It is expected that all of these issues will be 

part of the upcoming hearing and reopened comment period on this 

rulemaking. 

Attachments 
P.3 

Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery 

Industry and EPA 

Discussion Outline 

Test Requirements 

NPRM 

Test procedures 

Standards 

Trucks 

California Models 

System Distinction 

Integrated 

Non-Integrated 

Non-Canister 

Impact of other Regulations 

Enhanced Evap 

Spitback 

OnBoard Diagnostics 

Exhaust Emissions (FTP) 
+ s 

P.4 

TA-D vns&a^, 

/MIKE 5 

&UI>O QVCLBKJ 

V v « Btook S 

<U/( 

G^ v*u* 

0»Jaoa*cl Me*£yvjk 4/2^/9 3 

^?As 

// 

e?/^ 

C5?A 

SPA 

1

 i 

£Cu*y} /*t 

cHHtsLea^ 

C-^rv.jil«.e 

6 H riuj^rT^'i-) 

p ^ £M//AV. <?&/&?> 

F&tt-Q 

Q/^ 

Gt/ W SctJi. 

FWJ 

/M-^/4 

75ec? 

AIM 

f-O/LX^ 

&iM. 

&VA 

£/># 

tei*)G68-4Z29 

^ 0 44^_ 

^V«?B2& 

6^-^oH 

/«-**53^ 

^s-ryoy 

5~76-2<yzzrj 

57t.-62lQ 

s*u- s*m 

^Sr- ST4f 

'^^/ ^ <?*7-l??f 

&^5-2/SzT 

' 68S~^'5C\ 

STfe-^99Z 

3ZZ.-SV70 

($,i> m -43W 

(3l3)3Z2-0O33 

c 7 o 3 j S2S -77* £ 

& 3 ;$-** . z-4 **-

3iS^^t/? - 2/0* 7 

jT/7- 377-^7/ 

M/Mr'nte
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

              CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF
         THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Jennifer L. Good, President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 13, 2006                       /s/ Jennifer L. Good
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Jennifer L. Good
                                           President and Chief Operating Officer
                                           (principal executive officer and
                                           principal financial officer)
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rodrigo Cruz Matta, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Rodrigo Cruz Matta By: Rodrigo Cruz Matta
Chief Executive Officer
Distribución y Servicio D&S S.A.
July 15, 2005 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
### §1479. Federal liability for unreasonable damages

#### (a) Payment of compensation

The United States shall be obliged to pay compensation to the extent of the damage caused by measures which exceed those reasonably necessary to achieve the end mentioned in section 1472 of this title.

#### (b) Jurisdiction

Actions against the United States seeking compensation for any excessive measures may be brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims, in any district court of the United States, and in those courts enumerated in section 460 of title 28. For purposes of this chapter, American Samoa shall be included within the judicial district of the District Court of the United States for the District of Hawaii, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands shall be included within the judicial districts of both the District Court of the United States for the District of Hawaii and the District Court of Guam.

#### (c) Burden of proof

With respect to intervention for a substance identified pursuant to section 1473(a) of this title, the United States has the burden of establishing that, under the circumstances present at the time of the intervention, the substance could reasonably pose a grave and imminent danger analogous to that posed by a substance enumerated in the protocol.

(Pub. L. 93–248, §10, Feb. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 95–302, §1(4), June 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 345; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §161(6), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

1978—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–302 added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

For effective date of amendment by Pub. L. 95–302, see section 2 of Pub. L. 95–302, set out as a note under section 1487 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
### §§361 to 368. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–89, §4(b), Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 599

Section 361, act June 20, 1874, ch. 344, §10, 18 Stat. 128; 1946 Reorg. Plan. No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, required filing of reports to Coast Guard on accidents involving United States vessels and provided penalty for failure to comply. See sections 6101, 6103 of Title 46, Shipping.

Section 362, act June 20, 1874, ch. 344, §11, 18 Stat. 128; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, required reporting of probable loss of vessels and provided penalty for failure to comply. See sections 6101, 6103 of Title 46.

Section 363, acts June 20, 1874, ch. 344, §12, 18 Stat. 128; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, related to transmission of reports by Coast Guard officials to Commandant of Coast Guard.

Section 364, acts June 20, 1874, ch. 344, §13, 18 Stat. 128; Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 389, §11, 29 Stat. 689; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, related to remission and recovery of penalties. See section 2107 of Title 46.

Section 365, act Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 153, §15, 38 Stat. 1184; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, related to reports by owners of barges in tow. See section 6101 of Title 46.

Section 366, act Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 153, §15, 38 Stat. 1184; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097, required Commandant of Coast Guard to transmit annually to Congress a summary of reports transmitted to him by Coast Guard officials as required under sections 361 to 365 of this title. See section 6307 of Title 46.

Section 367, act Sept. 4, 1890, ch. 875, §1, 26 Stat. 425, related to duty of master of a vessel in collision to give aid, and to give name of his vessel together with other information about his vessel. See sections 2303, 2304 of Title 46.

Section 368, act Sept. 4, 1890, ch. 875, §2, 26 Stat. 425, set out penalties for failure to give aid as required by section 367 of this title. See sections 2303, 2304 of Title 46.

Act Sept. 4, 1890, ch. 875, §3, 26 Stat. 425, which provided that sections 367 and 368 of this title were to take effect at a time to be fixed by President by proclamation (effective Dec. 15, 1890, by Presidential Proclamation of Nov. 18, 1890, 26 Stat. 1561), was repealed by Pub. L. 98–89, §4(b), 97 Stat. 599.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the quarterly Report of
Textmunication Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wais Asefi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                            
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
    of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



|By:    | /s/
    Wais Asefi      | 
|------ | ----------------------- | 
|Name:  | Wais Asefi              | 
|Title: | Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date:  | June 16, 2016           | 



This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**Order entered December 21, 2012**

**In The**

**Court of Appeals**

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

**No. 05-12-00825-CV**

**Carl Benson, Appellant**

**V.**

**JPMorgan Chase, Appellee**

**On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court**

**Dallas County, Texas**

**Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-11135-F**

**ORDER**

The Court has before it appellant’s December 18, 2012 motion to extend time to amend brief and request for court appointed attorney.  The Court **DENIES** the request for a court appointed attorney and **GRANTS** the motion to extend time.  The Court **ORDERS** appellant to file his amended brief within forty-five days of the date of this order.

/s/MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 78 FR 62418, Oct. 22, 2013.

Editorial Note on Part 351
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 351 appear at 89 FR 20832, Mar. 25, 2024.

§ 351.702 Applicability dates for countervailing duty regulations. ( a ) Notwithstanding § 351.701, the regulations in subpart E of this part apply to: ( 1 ) All CVD investigations initiated on the basis of petitions filed after December 28, 1998;
( 2 ) All CVD administrative reviews initiated on the basis of requests filed on or after the first day of January 1999; and
( 3 ) To all segments of CVD proceedings self-initiated by the Department after December 28, 1998.
( b ) Segments of CVD proceedings to which subpart E of this part does not apply will continue to be guided by the Department's previous methodology (in particular, as described in the 1989 Proposed Regulations), except to the extent that the previous methodology was invalidated by the URAA, in which case the Secretary will treat subpart E of this part as a restatement of the Department's interpretation of the requirements of the Act as amended by the URAA.
[63 FR 65417, Nov. 25, 1998]
### §624. Protection of existing valid claims

Nothing in this chapter contained shall be construed to limit or restrict the rights of the owner or owners of any valid mining claim located prior to the date of withdrawal or reservation: Provided, That nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit or restrict the rights of the owner or owners of any mining claim who are diligently working to make a discovery of valuable minerals at the time any future withdrawal or reservation for power development is made.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 797, §5, 69 Stat. 683.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements  for the nine month period  ended  January 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                            Jan-31-1997
<CASH>                                                    2,302,566
<SECURITIES>                                              1,021,867
<RECEIVABLES>                                               435,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                 270,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          4,039,151
<PP&E>                                                      103,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                               17,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            4,199,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       182,537
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       1
<COMMON>                                                  6,739,336
<OTHER-SE>                                               (2,722,534)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              4,199,340
<SALES>                                                     430,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            430,501
<CGS>                                                       150,421
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               280,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            806,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (526,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             205,447
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (320,863)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (.02)
        

</TABLE>
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA

No. 04-149 November 29, 2004

NRC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS 

TO MEET DEC. 2-4 IN ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards will hold a

public meeting Dec. 2-4, in Rockville, Md., to discuss, among other items, a preliminary document on

a method for estimating the possibility of loss-of-coolant accidents at nuclear power plants. The

committee will also discuss a proposed change to NRC regulations to use more risk insights into

emergency core cooling systems for nuclear power reactors.

The meeting will be held in Room T-2B3 of the agency’s Two White Flint North building, at

11545 Rockville Pike. Open portions are scheduled from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Thursday; 8:30 a.m.

to 6:00 p.m. on Friday; and 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, although some portions of the Saturday

morning session may be closed to the public for security reasons. A complete agenda is available on

the NRC’s Web site at: http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acrs/agenda/2004. 

Individuals with questions or those wanting to make public statements during the meeting

should contact Sam Duraiswamy at 301-415-7364.

###
#### § 158.28 Waiver of evidence.

The port director may waive the production of any of the evidence required by this subpart if the validity of the claim is otherwise established to his satisfaction.
### §1370. State authority

Except as expressly provided in this chapter, nothing in this chapter shall (1) preclude or deny the right of any State or political subdivision thereof or interstate agency to adopt or enforce (A) any standard or limitation respecting discharges of pollutants, or (B) any requirement respecting control or abatement of pollution; except that if an effluent limitation, or other limitation, effluent standard, prohibition, pretreatment standard, or standard of performance is in effect under this chapter, such State or political subdivision or interstate agency may not adopt or enforce any effluent limitation, or other limitation, effluent standard, prohibition, pretreatment standard, or standard of performance which is less stringent than the effluent limitation, or other limitation, effluent standard, prohibition, pretreatment standard, or standard of performance under this chapter; or (2) be construed as impairing or in any manner affecting any right or jurisdiction of the States with respect to the waters (including boundary waters) of such States.

(June 30, 1948, ch. 758, title V, §510, as added Pub. L. 92–500, §2, Oct. 18, 1972, 86 Stat. 893.)
#### § 210.22 [Reserved]
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03309**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03309\03309_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03309\03309_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 03309\03309_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03309\03309_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03309\03309_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03309\03309_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03309\03309_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03309\03309_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

03309\Certification Statement Plant ID 03309.pdf Plant certification statement x 03309\Supplemental Documents\03309 follow up questions.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up x 03309\Supplemental Documents\03309 follow up questions_response_2.10.2011.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

03309\Supplemental Documents\3309 aerial map.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03309\Supplemental Documents\3309 water balance diagram.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03309\Supplemental Documents\Part C, Section 2.1 Document 1.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03309\Supplemental Documents\Part C, Section 2.1, Document 2.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03309\Supplemental Documents\Part C, Section 2.1, Document 3.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03309\Supplemental Documents\Part C, Section 2.1, Document 4.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03309\Supplemental Documents\Part C, Section 2.1, Document 5.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03309\Supplemental Documents\Questionnaire follow up for Lawrence.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Carl W. Kotschau, Relator, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination annulled, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements, and relator reinstated. In the opinion of this court the evidence against the relator, considered in the light of testimony produced by him from disinterested witnesses, and which remained uncontradicted in the ease, failed to prove preponderantly a willful and conscious violation of duty by the relator. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.