alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 

 Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200

 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov 

Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov

 

No. 06-123 October 4, 2006

NRC TRITIUM TASK FORCE ISSUES REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, FINDS NO HEALTH IMPACT 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today issued the findings of a group of experts from

throughout the agency, as well as the State of Illinois, concerning inadvertent, unmonitored releases of

radioactive liquids, containing primarily tritium, from U.S. commercial nuclear power plants. The task

force found no impact on public health from these events.

“We looked at a wide range of releases that go back to 1996, and even included a substantial

release from the Hatch plant in 1986, and none of these events led to appreciable radiation doses to

people outside the plants,” said Stuart Richards, the NRC senior manager who led the task force.

“There are, however, areas of our regulations that could better cover these sorts of inadvertent spills

and leaks.”

For instance, many of the components and systems that have leaked are built to standards less

strict than those for systems needed for reactor safety. A number of the systems involved in the releases

also fall outside the NRC’s requirements for regular maintenance and inspections, increasing the

possibility that leaks might go undetected.

The task force produced 26 recommendations that apply to the NRC, nuclear power plant

operators or both. For instance, the task force recommended updating NRC regulations on monitoring

radioactive releases and the environment in and around a plant, to take into account state-of-the-art

technology and practices. The task force also recommended that nuclear power plant operators work

with local and state agencies to voluntarily report information on radioactive liquid releases that

otherwise fall below NRC reporting requirements. Each of the NRC’s program offices (e.g., Nuclear

Reactor Regulation) will consider the recommendations relevant to their mission.

The full report, as well as additional information on inadvertent releases, will be available on

the NRC Web site at this address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/grndwtr-contam-tritium.html .
The task force included staff from each of the NRC’s regional offices, as well as the Offices of

Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Regulatory Research,

Public Affairs, and Executive Director for Operations. The Illinois Emergency Management Agency

also provided a representative to the task force.

###

News releases are available through a free list serve subscription at the following Web address: 

http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/listserver.html . The NRC homepage at www.nrc.gov also offers a SUBSCRIBE link. 

E-mail notifications are sent to subscribers when news releases are posted to NRC's Web site.
### §§3421 to 3426. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. J, title CIII, §10306(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3974

Section 3421, Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12102, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1419, related to establishment of an undersea research program.

Section 3422, Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12103, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1419, related to powers of program Director.

Section 3423, Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12104, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1419, related to administrative structure.

Section 3424, Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12105, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1420, related to research, exploration, education, and technology programs.

Section 3425, Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12106, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1420, related to competitive selection of regional centers.

Section 3426, Pub. L. 111–11, title XII, §12107, Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1420, related to authorization of appropriations.
#### Etta L. Balsam, Respondent, v. Metered Oil, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

The case presented a pure question of fact and the determination of the jury was warranted by the evidence. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.
The Honorable Rick Perry 

Governor of Texas 

Austin, TX 78711 

. Dear Governor Perry: 

THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATlON 

WASHINGTON, O,C, 20590 

May02,2012 

'' 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application of Southwest Airlines for two beyondperimeter slot exemptions at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA). Southwest's 

application proposes to servt"~ Austin-Bergstrom International Airport, Texas, with one round trip 

per day from DCA. 

Under authority granted in the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012,. the 

U.S. Department ofTransportatiotl will be awarding to new entrant or limited incumbent 

carriers a total of eight slot exemptions at DCA. which would support four daily round trips. 

We received Southwest's application on March 12. Other timely applications were rece.ived 

from Air Canada, proposing one round trip to Vancouver, British Columbia; Alaska Airlines, one 

round trip to Portland, Oregon, and one round trip to San Diego; Frontier Airlines, one rom1d trip 

to Colorado Sp.rings and beyond to San Diego; JetBiue Airlines, one round trip to San Juan, 

Puerto Rico~ and one round trip to Austin, Texas; Sun Country Airlines1 one round trip to Las 

Ve;gas; and Virgin America, Inc., two round trips to San Francisco. 

As the matter is still penc;ling, I cannot comment on the merits of the points raised in your letter. 

However~ I can assure you that all applications the Department received will be given full and 

fair consideration and will be evaluated against the selection criteria specified in the statute. 

The Department's action on this matter is being administered through a public docket, which 

allows all interested parties the O:pportuni mment. Following our normal practice, I am 

placing a copy of your letter and this r n docket number DOT:.2(') 1 

I appreciate your interest in thi
### §763. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8510(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4757; Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(13), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165

Section, acts June 20, 1918, ch. 103, §6, 40 Stat. 608; Nov. 4, 1918, ch. 201, §1, 40 Stat. 1036; June 21, 1955, ch. 170, §1, 69 Stat. 166; Pub. L. 85–142, Aug. 14, 1957, 71 Stat. 365; Pub. L. 90–164, §1, Nov. 29, 1967, 81 Stat. 519; Pub. L. 92–455, §6(a), Oct. 2, 1972, 86 Stat. 761, related to retirement of officers and employees of the Lighthouse Service.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 763 consisted mostly of provisions from section 6 of act June 20, 1918, as amended, with one additional proviso from act Nov. 4, 1918, and was restated at former section 2532 of Title 14, Coast Guard. Section 6 of act June 20, 1918, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8510(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4757. The proviso from act Nov. 4, 1918, was repealed by Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(13), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4165.
### §395. Limit of sentence

It shall not be lawful for the court to sentence any person convicted in such trial to any greater punishment than imprisonment in jail for one year, or to a fine exceeding $500, or both, in its discretion, in those cases where the laws of the United States authorize such imprisonment and fine.

(R.S. §4304.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4304 derived from act June 11, 1864, ch. 121, §5, 13 Stat. 125.
#### § 302.104 Applicability of regulations to applicants and employees.

Each agency shall follow the provisions of this part relating to examination, rating, and selection for appointment of an applicant when a qualified preference eligible or person entitled to priority consideration applies for appointment to a position covered by this part. Each agency, in its discretion, may follow these provisions when no preference eligible or person entitled to priority consideration applies.
**Exhibit 12.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Janice Lee, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of hanarotelecom incorporated (the“Company”).
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.
5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 29, 2005
     /s/ Janice LeeJanice Lee
#### § 2411.14 Record retention and preservation.

The Solicitor and the IG shall preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until such time as disposition or destruction is authorized by title 44 of the United States Code or the National Archives and Records Administration's General Records Schedule 14. Records will not be disposed of while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.

[88 FR 67063, Sept. 29, 2023]
|  |
|--|

View cartJoin nowHelp

TechRepublic members choose these applications for the ultimate recovery CD

Use System Recovery Utility to restore Win 98 after a hard disk meltdown

Build a recovery floppy for your Linux system with tomsrtbt

Restore deleted files with Recover4all Professional

Isn't this sexual harassment and how do I deal with it?

Downloads

White Papers

Discussion Center

E-newsletters

Technical Q&A

How Do I...?

Books & CDs

Site Map

Itanium not meeting Intel's goals

Microsoft extends block to SP2 auto update

Five tech firms at a crossroads

Apple fixes 15 flaws in Mac OS X

Microsoft under your thumb

View more

Cost savings with VoIP system administration
### §201a. Repealed. June 3, 1948, ch. 379, §8, 62 Stat. 291

Section, act Mar. 9, 1928, ch. 159, §1, 45 Stat. 251, related to extension of coal prospecting permits.
Amendment No. 8 to 1996 Long-term Incentive and Capital Accumulations Plan



 Exhibit 10.34 
  
 BSB BANCORP, INC. 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 8 
 TO 

1996 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AND 
 CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN 
  
 The BSB Bancorp, Inc. 1996 Long-Term
Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as set forth below, effective February 23, 2004: 
  
 1. The first sentence of Section 8.03(c) of Article VIII is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 (c) Accelerated Vesting for Changes of Control. Notwithstanding the
general rule described in clause (a), all outstanding Options will become immediately vested and exercisable in the event there is an actual or threatened change in control of the Company. 
  
 2. The plan shall otherwise be unchanged by this Amendment Number 8.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/ A for the Year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Lauren Farrell, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



JULY 11, 2005              /S/ LAUREN FARRELL
                           -----------------------
                           LAUREN FARRELL
                           CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO AMBIENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY AMBIENT CORPORATION AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1635 Introduced in House (IH)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1635

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
 complete transition period for the reduction of Medicare beneficiary 
 copayment for hospital outpatient department services furnished under 
                         the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2003

Mr. Stark (for himself, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Kleczka, Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
 Texas, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Abercrombie, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Frost, and Mr. 
   Frank of Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
   the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a 
 complete transition period for the reduction of Medicare beneficiary 
 copayment for hospital outpatient department services furnished under 
                         the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Outpatient Copayment 
Reduction Act of 2003''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BUY-DOWN OF COPAYMENT ON HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT 
              SERVICES.

    Section 1833(t)(8)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395l(t)(8)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking subclause (V) and inserting 
the following:
                                    ``(V) For procedures performed in 
                                2006, 40 percent.
                                    ``(VI) For procedures performed in 
                                2007, 35 percent.
                                    ``(VII) For procedures performed in 
                                2008, 30 percent.
                                    ``(VIII) For procedures performed 
                                in 2009, 25 percent.
                                    ``(IX) For procedures performed in 
                                2010 and thereafter, 20 percent.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 315
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 315 appear at 70 FR 72067, Dec. 1, 2005.

§ 315.609 Appointment based on service in United States positions of the Panama Canal Commission. ( a ) *Agency authority.* An agency may appoint noncompetitively, for other than temporary or term employment, a United States citizen who has served under nontemporary appointment in a continuing career position of the Panama Canal Commission located in the United States.
( b ) *Service requirement.* An agency may appoint such an individual under this section only when, immediately prior to separation from a qualifying appointment with the Panama Canal Commission in the United States, the individual served continuously for at least 1 year under such qualifying appointment or under a combination of such appointment and nontemporary appointment in the Canal Zone Merit System or the Panama Canal Employment System.
( c ) *Time limits.* ( 1 ) There is no time limit on the appointment under this section of an employee who: ( i ) Is a preference eligible; or
( ii ) Has completed at least 3 years of service, which did not include any break in service longer than 30 days, under one or more nontemporary appointments in Panama Canal Commission positions located in the United States or in positions under the Canal Zone Merit System and/or the Panama Canal Employment System.
( 2 ) An agency may appoint under this section an employee who does not meet the conditions in (c)(1) of this section only if no more than 3 years have elapsed since the individual's separation from a qualifying appointment.
( d ) *Tenure on appointment.* ( 1 ) On appointment under paragraph (a) of this section, an individual whose qualifying service does not include any break in service of more than 30 days and totals at least 3 years becomes a career employee.
( 2 ) All other individuals appointed under this section become career-conditional employees.
( e ) *Acquisition of competitive status.* A person appointed under paragraph (a) of this section automatically acquires a competitive status: ( 1 ) On appointment, if he or she has satisfactorily completed a 1-year trial period, which did not include more than 22 workdays in nonpay status, during qualifying employment with the Panama Canal Commission.
( 2 ) On satisfactory completion of probation in accordance with § 315.801(a)(3) if he or she had not completed such a 1-year trial period.
[48 FR 29667, June 28, 1983]
Rev 0 (9/08)

Comments in Response to 

“Final rule; request for comments”

Docket: FAA-2011-1000 Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-048-AD

Comments have been received in response to: “Final rule; request for comments,”

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted.

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal.

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Empire Airlines

(Please check one)

 These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD.

 These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

FAA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.)

______Jeffrey Lee_____ December 9, 2011__

Name: Date:

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Tax Credit Trust, a Delaware
statutory business trust Series I (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Salzman, Chief Executive Officer of
Richman American Credit Corp., Manager of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/David SalzmanDavid
      SalzmanChief
      Executive Officer of Richman AmericanCredit
      Corp., Manager of the RegistrantFebruary
      10, 2010
NRC NEWS

 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

 2443 Warrenville Road

 Lisle IL 60532

 Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov E-mail: opa3@nrc.gov

No. III-05-029 May 23, 2005

CONTACT: Jan Strasma (630) 829-9663 

Viktoria Mitlyng (630) 829-9662 

NRC TO DISCUSS PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF AN IN-DEPTH 

INSPECTION AT PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff will meet with representatives of FirstEnergy

Nuclear Operating Company in Painesville, Ohio, on Thursday, May 26, to discuss the preliminary

results of an in-depth inspection conducted at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. The plant is located at

Perry, Ohio.

The meeting, which will be open to the public for observation, is scheduled to begin at 2 p.m. in

the Barberry Room at the Renaissance Quail Hollow Resort, 11080 Concord-Hambden Road, Painesville.

Before the meeting is adjourned, NRC staff will be available to answer questions from the public.

The three-part inspection was conducted by the NRC as a part of its heightened oversight of the

plant, which resulted from past problems with safety system equipment. The inspection focused on the

utility’s corrective action program ( how it finds, evaluates, and fixes problems), the plant’s operating

procedures, staff and management performance, engineering, emergency planning. The inspection also

reviewed the plant’s performance during its recent refueling outage. The team began the first part of

the inspection in January. 

“The Perry plant continues to operate safely,” said James Caldwell, NRC Regional

Administrator. “However, the NRC has increased its oversight of the Perry plant because of previous

equipment problems. This extensive inspection was conducted to provide the agency with important

insights into plant operations and the effectiveness of FirstEnergy’s performance improvement

initiatives.”

In August of last year, the NRC announced it was increasing scrutiny over the Perry plant as a

result of several equipment problems which occurred during the period October 2002 through May

2004. The NRC found that these problems were of “low to moderate safety significance” and, in two

of the instances, the utility had not taken adequate corrective action initially to resolve the problems.

The final inspection report will be publicly available in the NRC’s Agencywide Documents

Access and Management System, or ADAMS, at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Use

Docket Number 05000440 to locate the report. Help in using ADAMS is available from the NRC

Public Document Room at 1-800-397-4209.

###